IR 05000440/1982004

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:38, 21 November 2023 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-440/82-04 & 50-441/82-04 on 820301-0430.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Observation of Concrete Placements & Assembly of Emergency Diesel Generator
ML20054F553
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/1982
From: Gildner M, Konklin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20054F549 List:
References
50-440-82-04, 50-440-82-4, 50-441-82-04, 50-441-82-4, NUDOCS 8206170095
Download: ML20054F553 (4)


Text

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Reports No. 50-440/82-04(DPRP); 50-441/82-04(DPRP)

Docket Nos.. 50-440; 50-441 Licenses No. CPPR-148; CPPR-149 Licensee: Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P.O. Box 5000 Cleveland, OH 44101 Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Perry Site, Perry, OH Inspection Conducted: March 1 through April 30, 1982 s

Inspector: .Gildnek f/8I/f2 Approved By: J b

fhonklin, Chief f/8f/g2,

' '

eactor Projects Section 2A Inspection Summary Irspection on March 1 through April 30, 1982 (Reports No. 50-440/82-04(DPRP);

50-441/82-04(DPRP@)

Areas Inspected: Routine inspection by the Resident Inspector of safety related construction activities including plant tours; observation of con-cete placements; observation of assembly of an emergency diesel generator; witnessing tests for proposed correction of biological shield wall voiding; inspection of corrective actions taken by a contractor QA department re-sulting from internal audit; and participation in SALP meeting with License This inspection involved a total'of 135 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector including 18 inspector-hours onsite during off-shift Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

I l

l I

l l

l

!

!

B206170095 820601 gDRADOCK 05000440 PDR

.

. -

DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted- Licensee Personnel D. R. Davidson, Systems Engineering.and Construction Vice President

  • M. R. Edelman, Nuclear Engineering Department Manager R. L. Farrell, Nuclear Quality Assurance Manager J. J. Waldron, Perry Plant Department Manager J. A. Kline, Construction General Supervising Engineer E. Riley, Construction Quality General Supervising Engineer G. R. Leidich, CQS QE Supervisor Kaiser Engineering, Inc. (KEI)

M. R. Kritzer, Lead Civil Quality Engineer Contractor Personnel T. J. Woodman, Project Manager (L. K. Comstock)

P. R. Merlin, QA/QC Manager (L. K. Comstock)

T. Hesmond, QA/QC Manager (National Engineering)

The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor personnel during this inspection perio * Denotes those attending one or more of the exit meeting . Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item (440/82-05-01; 441/82-05-01): Fire sup-pression system in certain safety related areas not in compliance with State Code. Gilbert fire suppression engineers have met with the local fire inspector and are making required system modifications to comply with State Codes for those structures clearly under the jurisdiction of the 1979 Revision to the Ohio Basic Building Cod These system modifications will be complete prior to occupancy of the areas. These system modifications do not degrade compliance with 10 CFR 50. Appendix R design requirements for the Fire Suppression Syste . Licensee Action on Other Items ,

(0 pen) 10 CFR 50.55(e) Reports; Subjects: " Incomplete Fill Detected in Reactor Building #2 Bioshield Wall" and " Biological Shield Walls Heavy Density Concrete, Units 1 and 2". The Resident Inspector wit-nessed placement testing material being evaluated for repair of referenced deficiencies in the heavy density concrete of the bioshield walls of Units 1 and 2. The material, Master Builder's LL-927 High

.

.

Density Grout, was placed in a mockup of the bioshield wall to check for workability into blind voids without subsequent revoiding. Test blocks were made with different durations of vibrating to check for grout separation. Test cores were obtained from various place-monts and checked for density. The lowest obtained density from the

, upper portion of the longest vibrated test placement was in excess of the required density by fifteen (15) percent. The proposed material appears acceptable, however, the 10 CFR 50.55(e) report remains open pending actual bioshield repair and actual placement sample test ]

4. Plant Tours During normal working hours and during off-shifts, the inspector made several walkdowns of the plant to observe general housekeeping and work progres No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie . Observation of Containment Concrete Placements The inspector observed two placements of part of the upper refueling pools in Reactor Building Number 2 by National Engineering and Con-tracting Company, including placement RB2-WO3-689 on 3/12/82 and placement RB2-WO8-689 on 4/16/82. The inspector verified that the required pre placement inspections were made and documented. The inspector observed inprocess inspection made by the contractor and project CQS inspectors observed concrete sampling, and reviewed test results for interim cure strengt !

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

l 6. Observation of Final Assembly of Diesel Generator The inspector observed the assembly of a Unit 2 Emergency Diesel

Generator. The assembly was cone by L. K. Comstock using procedure 4.3.28, " Installation of the Rotor and Stator for Emergency Generators".

'

. The installation was being monitored by a General Electric Company technical representativ Installation problems, caused by congestion in the assembly area, required changes in the approved installation procedure. The written changes were field approved by those personnel who approved the original procedure, and by the GE technical repre-

, sentative prior to implementation. All of the field generated pro-cedural changes were incorporated into a subsequent revision to the i procedure for use in assembly of the Unit 1 Emergency Diesel Generator.

,

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

i 7. Review of Contractor Corrective Actions

. The inspector reviewed changes in the QA program of L. K. Comstock i

resulting from a recent internal audit performed by a Comstock i

!

l

!

!

'

- . ~ _ _ - _ _ , _ . - _ . . _ _ . _ . - - . _ - - __ _ - _ . _ . _ .

. . . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ .

'

1 e

! .

Corporate QA team. The changes center around better documentation control by limiting access to documentation flies, a check list of-required documents for each. equipment file, as review of documentation for completeness and accuracy before filing, and procedures which.

.

more clearly define documentation. requirement No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie ,

8. SALP Meeting with Licensee Management The inspector and NRC Region III management met with Cleveland Electric Illuminating Perry Project Management on April 2, 1982,

to present and discuss the results of the SALP II evaluation of I the Perry facility. Details of that evaluation are contained in a separate repor . Exit Meeting i The resident Inspector met with the licensee representatives denoted in Paragraph 1 on March 19 and April 30, 1982, to discuss the scope and results of the inspection.

i i,

i

,

J

!

!

i i

i I

'

.

L

_ ,- . . - _ _ .