ML20210E811

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:30, 4 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies That Encl Memorandum & Order,CLI-85-14,issued on 850801,authorizing Issuance of Full Power Ol.Deferral of Licensing Based on Allegations Found Unwarranted.W/O Encl
ML20210E811
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/06/1985
From: Cunningham G
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17083B484 List:
References
FOIA-86-197 ALAB-782, ALAB-811, CLI-85-14, NUDOCS 8609250097
Download: ML20210E811 (1)


Text

..

~

1

~

{

2. ML -

AUG 6 1985 7

Note to: Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation From: Guy H. Cunningham, III Executive Legal Director

[

SUBJECT:

DIABLO CANYON UNIT 2 - COMMISSION DECISION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF FULL POWER LICENSE On August 1, 1985, the Commission issued a Memorandum and Order, CLI-85-14, copy attached, authorizing the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation to issue a full power operating license for Diablo Canyon Unit 2. In addition, the Commission denied Joint Intervenors' Petition for Review of ALAB-811, the Appeal Board's recent decision favorably resolving Unit 2 design verification issues, and their Application for a Stay. As a separate matter, the Commission declined to take review of ALAB-782, the Appeal Board's dismissal of Joint Intervenors' motion to reopen the record on seismic issues.

In CLI-85-14, the Commission also found no reason to defer licensing based on allegations, stating that the staff's review and screening had found that there would be no significant effect on public health and safety. The Commission also noted the staff's satisfactory resolution of design verification issues in SSER 29, the results of its review cf piping and support issues in SSER 30, and the staff's review and satisfactory resolution of a number of items that were pertinent to the low power licensing decision for Unit 2 in SSER 31. Finally, the Commission commented on the very favorable operating experience of Unit 2 under its current low power license.

Commission Asselstine dissented frcm the Order. The bases for his dissent are his continuing concerns regarding cerisideratien of the effects of earthquakes in emergency planning and his view that further investigation / evaluation of issues raised by Isa Yin should have been performed.

\

Guy H. Cunningham, III Executive Legal Director i

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ enclosure:

W. J. Dircks J. Martin, Reg. V J. Taylor l 8609250097 860905 PDR FOIA '

l HOLMES86-197 PDR