ML20211J579

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:57, 6 May 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Exam Rept 50-400/OL-86-03 on 860923-26.Exam results:11 of 15 Candidates Passed Simulator Exams & 1 Candidate Passed Simulator Reexam
ML20211J579
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/27/1986
From: Casto C, Munro J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20211J543 List:
References
50-400-OL-86-03, NUDOCS 8611110181
Download: ML20211J579 (3)


Text

-

'b s

ENCLOSURE 1-EXAMINATION REPORT 400/0L-86-03 Facility Licensee: Carolina Power and Light Company P. O.-Box 1551-Raleigh,.NC 27602 Facility Name: Shearon Harris Facility Docket No.: 50-400 Simulator examinations were administered at Shearon Harris near New Hill, North -

Carolina.

Chief Examiner: d ,- .

C arles A. Casto

[ owc /o '27- M Date Signed Approved by: ,, a /27 /f4 Joh F. , ting Section Chief Date Signed Summary:

Examinations.on September 23-26, 1986 Simulator examinations were administered to 15 candidates; 11 of whom passed.

- A simulator reexamination was administered to one candidate, who passed.

K$5bbO$ao PDR J

d W

REPORT DETAILS

1. Facility Employees Contacted:
  • B. Furr. Vice President, Operations Training and Technical Services
  • J. Will'.s, Plant General Manager
  • C. Olexik, Jr., Director, Nuclear and Simulator Training .
  • W. Geise, Project Specialist
  • J. Collins, Operations Manager
  • F. Tollison, Manager, Nuclear Training Section
  • W. Powell, Director, Training HTU
  • Attended Exit Meeting
2. Examiners:
  • C. Casto D. Nelson C. Shiraki D. Silk
  • Chief Examiner
3. Exit Meeting At' the conclusion of the site visit the examiners met with representatives of the plant staff to discuss the results of the examination. Those individuals who clearly passed the simulator examination were identified.

There were 3 generic weaknesses noted during the simulator examination. The areas of below normal performance were: 1) verification of automatic actions; 2) understanding of instrument response; and 3) use of procedures.

The -licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by.the examiners.

J

_.,-A e

4W DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK I

l l

l i

(

f

- - - - -