ML20237H331
| ML20237H331 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 08/27/1987 |
| From: | Casto C, Munro J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237H323 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-OL-87-02, 50-400-OL-87-2, NUDOCS 8709030210 | |
| Download: ML20237H331 (3) | |
Text
I h
l l
ENCLOSURE 1 l
EXAMINATION REPORT 400/0L-87-02 Facility Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 l
Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Facility Docket No.:
50-400 Opercting tests were administered at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant nearNewHill,Northyarolina.
<f/N/b Chief Examiner:
i,A
/,c
/f Cha'rtss/A. Casto '
Date Signed b"t' h
i hl 9/2.7/h )
Approved by:
John F. Murro, Section CMef
' Date Signed Summary:
Examinations on August 4-5, 1987.
I i
Operating tests were administered to three candidates; three of whom passed, i
For the licensed personnel; two of two passed integrated plant operation examinations.
For the re-take; one of one passed the complete operating examination.
l l
l l
l I
l l
8709030210 870827 PDR ADDCK 05000400 V
REPORT DETAILS I
1.
Facility Employees Contacted:
- W. Geise, Project Specialist
- W. Powell, Director, HTU
- J. Hudson, Project Specialist
- D. Batton, Acting, Operations Manager
- Attended Exit Meeting
)
2.
Examiners:
- C, Casto J. Arildsen D. Shepard B. Dean G. Maxwell, SRI S. Burris (Resident Inspector)
- Chief Examiner 3.
Exit Meeting At the conclusion of the site visit the examiners met with representatives of the plant staff to discuss the results of the examination.
l There were no generic weaknesses noted during the oral examination.
One l
generic weakness was noted during the administration of the simulator l
examinations.
The area of below normal performance was communications.
Items associated with the simulator performance were:
l 1.
The examiners took note of a significant effort by the facility to l
match the simulator furniture with that of the control room.
i l
2.
The examiners noted the unavailability of a UPS channel malfunction l
and throttling capabilities for the main feed pump discharge valves.
3.
Modeling problems existed with both ' 4 RWST level and VCT boron j
concentration.
4.
Sof tware problems existed in the turbine runback circuit, service water valves SW-1055/1208 and vital bus channel trouble alarm.
5.
The unavailability of a stop watch for surveillance testing.
The deficiencies were discussed with the plant staff representatives.
N 2
The cooperation given to the examiners and the effort to ensure an atmosphere in the control room conducive to oral examinations was also noted and appreciated.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the examiners.
l l
1 1
J I
l 4
_- _ - - - - - - - _ _ _ - _ - - -