ML20215A534

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:10, 3 May 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Errata & Addenda Sheet 15,replacing Pages v/vi,3-2,4-3 & 4-16,to LOCA Analysis Rept for Dresden Units 2 & 3 & Quad Cities 1 & 2 Nuclear Power Station
ML20215A534
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Quad Cities, 05000000
Issue date: 05/21/1986
From:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20215A501 List:
References
79NED273, NEDO-24146A-ERR, NEDO-24146A-ERR-15, NUDOCS 8610060112
Download: ML20215A534 (8)


Text

.-

%1WL*

CUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPER ATIONS o CENER AL ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN JOSE CALIFORNIA 95125 l'

l GEN ER AL $ ELECTRIC APPLICABLE TO: ,

" ** "" 'NEDO-24146A ERRATA And ADDENDA

,, 79Nzn273 LOCA Analysis Report for SHEET TIT u

  • I Dresden Units 2, 3 and Quad May 1986 l oan Cities 1.2 Nuclear Power Stations NOTE: Corroet s// copses of the applicable l April 1979 ISSUE DATE gyg,gjof, ,, gjfg,,,

l INSTRUCTIONS

' GCORRECTIONS AND ADDITeoNS) l P RAG A L Nel t

1. Page v/vi Replace with new page v/vi l
2. Page 3-2 Replace with new page 3-2
3. Page 4-3 Replace with new page 4-3
4. Page 4-16 Replace with new page 4-16 i

l t

(Change brackets in right-hand margin indicate ,

areas where report has been revised.)

l l

l 8610060112 860918 PDR ADOCK 05000265 .

P PDR l

PAGE l Of l

r-NED0-24146A LIST OF WARTRS Table Title Pg i

1 Significant Input Parameters to the Loss-of-Coolant Accident 3-1

2 Summary of Break Spectrum Results 4-5 3 LOCA Analysis Figure Summary - Non-Lead Plant 4-6 4A MAPLEGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (7D212 - No Gad.) 4-7 4B MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (7D212L) 4-7 l 4C MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (7D230) 4-8 4D MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (EEIC - Pu) '4-8 4E MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (8D250) 4-9 4F MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (8D262) 4-9 l

4G MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (8DRB265L) 4-10 4H MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (Barrier LTA) 4--10 4I MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DRB282) 4-11

{

I 4J MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DRB265H/BP8DRB265H) 4-11 4K MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DRB239) 4-12 4L MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DGB284)* 4-12 4M MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DGB263L)* 4-13 4N MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DGB263H)* 4-13 40 MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DGB298)* 4-14

4P
MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DRB265L)

.'and (FSDG2265L)* 4-14

, 4Q MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (EP8DRB283H) 4-15 I. 4R MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (BP8DRB282) 4-15 4S MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (BP8DRB299) 4-16 4T MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (BP8DRB299L) 4-16]

i

  • Barrier fuel for the Barrier Fuel Demonstration Program l

l 1

! v/vi

f~

NEDO-24146A i 3. INPUT TO ANALYSIS A list of the significant plant input parameters to the LOCA analysis is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 SIGNIFICANT INPUT PARAMETERS TO THE LOSS-OF-COOLANT ACCIDENT ANALYSIS Plant Paraceters Core Thermal Power 2578 MWt, which corresponds to 102% of rated power Vessel Steam Output 9.96 x 106 lba/h, which corresponds to 102% of rated power Vessel Steam Dome Pressure 1020 psia Recirculation Line Break Area 4.18 ft (DBA) for Large Breaks - Suction .

Number of Drilled Bundles 156 Fuel Parameters:

Peak Technical Initial Specification Design Minimum Linear Heat Axial Critical Fuel Bundle Generation Kate Peaking Power Fuel Type Geometry (kW/ft) ,

Factor Ratio

  • A. 7D2,12 - No Gad . 7x7 17.5 1.57 1.2 17.5 1.2 B. 7D212L 7x7 1.57 C. 7D230 7x7 17.5 1.57 1.2 D. EEIC - Pu 7x7 17.5 1.57 1.2 E. 8D250 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 F. 8D262 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 C. 8DRB265L 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 B. Barrier LTA 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2

~ ' ~

1. P8DRB282 " ~~~~ 8x8 13.4 ~ 1.57 1.2 J. P8DRB265H/BP8DRB265H 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2

~

K. PSDRB239 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 To account for the 2% uncertainty in bundle power required by Appendix K, the SCAT calculation is performed with an MCPR of 1.18 (i.e.,1.2 divided by 1.02) for a bundle with an initial MCPR of 1.20, 3-1

NEDO-24146A Table 1 (Continued)

Fuel Parameters: (Continued)

Peak Technical Initial Specification Design Minimus Linear Heat Axial Critical Fuel Bundle Generation Rate Peaking Power Fuel Type Geometry kW/ft) Factor Ratio L. P8DGB284** 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 M. P8DGB263L** 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 N. P8DGB263Ha* 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2"

0. P8DGB298** 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 P. P8DRB265L/ 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 P8DGB265L**

Q. BP8DRB283H 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2

1. BP8DRB282 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 S. BP8DRB299 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 T. BP8DRB299L 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2
    • Barrigt fuel for the Barrier Fuel Demonstration Program 3-2

NED0-24146A 4.5 RESULTS OF THE CHASTE ANALYSIS This code is used, with suitable inputs from the other codes, to calculate the fuel cladding heatup rate, peak cladding temperature, peak local cladding oxidation, and core-wide metal-water reaction for large breaks. The detailed fuel model in CHASTE considers transient gap conductance, clad swelling and rupture, and metal-water reaction. The empirical core spray heat transfer and channel wetting correlations are built into CHASTE, which solves the transient heat transfer equations for the entire LOCA transient at a single axial plane in a single fuel assembly. Iterative applications of CHASTE determine the maximum permissible planar power where required to satisfy the requirement's of 10CFR50.46 acceptance criteria.

The CHASTE resulta presented are:

e Peak Cladding Temperature versus time o Peak Cladding Temperature versus Break Ares e Peak Cladding Temperature and Peak Local oxidation versus Planar

! Average Exposure for the most limiting break size.

I l

e

  • Maximum Averrage Planar Heat Generation Rate (MPLHGR) versus Planar Average Exposure for the most limiting break size A summary of the analytical results is given in Table 2. Table 3 lists the figures provided for this analysis. The MPLBGR values for each fuel type for D2,3/QC1,2 are presented in Tables 4A through 4T.

4.6 METHODS In the following sections, it will be useful to refer to the methods used to analyze DBA, large breaks, and small breaks. For jet-pump reactors, these are

.. defined as follows:

a. DBA Methods. LAMB / SCAT / SAFE /DBA-REFLOOD/ CHASTE. Break size: DBA.

4-3

T NEDO-24146

b. Large Break Methods (LBM). LAMB / SCAT / SAFE /non-DBA REFLOOD/ CHASTE.

Break sizes: 1.0 ft f_ A < DBA.

b. Small Break Methods (SBM). SAFE /non-DBA REFLOOD. Beat transfer coefficients: nucleate boiling prior to core uncovery, 25 Btu /hr-ft *F after recovery, core spray when appropriate. Peak cladding temperature and peak local oxidation are calculated in 2

non-DBA-REFLOOD. Break sizes: A < 1.0 ft , _

O l

e l

i l

4-4 s

- - - . . . , , _ , - - - , . , . , _ _ , . , , , , - - . , - - . - - . . -.,,,-.---n,-nn-,ny,.=- - , , . , , , , . _ , . , - - , . - - , . . , ---- - --- _ ,.,-n, , -~--n -

I l

NEDO-24146A e

Table 4Q MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE PLANT: Quad Cities 1,2 FUEL TYPE: BP8DRB283H Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation (mwd /t) (kW/ft) (*F) Fraction 200 11.2 2128 0.028 1,000 11.2 2121 0.028 5,000 11.7 2157 0.030 10,000 12.0 2192 0.033 15,000 12.0 2199 0.033

'20,000 11.9 2195 0.033 25,000 11.4 2132 0.027 30,000 10.8 2051 0.038 35.000 10.3 1956 0.031 40,000 9.6 1841 0.009 45,000 9.0 1764 0.007 NOTE: Credit taken for the effects of pre-pressurization of the fuel rods.

Table 4R MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE PLANT: Quad Cities 1,2 FUEL TYPE: BP8DRB282 Average Planar .

Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation CMWd/t) (kW/ f t) (*F) Fraction 200 11.2 2131 0.029 1,000 11.2 2128 0.028 5,000 11.8 2178 0.032 10,000 12.0 2188 0.032 15,000 12.1 2199 0.033 20,000 11.9 2192 0.033 25,000 11.4 2129 0.027 i 30,000 10.8 2047 0.038 l 35,000 10.3 1957 0.031 40,000 9.6 1840 0.009 45,000 8.9 1761 0.007 I

NOTE: Credit taken for the effects of pre-pressurization of the. fuel rods. .

I 4-15 a.__-,..-_--___-__...--_ - - . . . . . . . - _ - - - - . _ - . - - _-- ---

f

. NEDO-24146A Table 4S MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PIANAR EXPOSURE PIANT: Quad Cities 1&2 PUEL . TYPE: BP8DRB299 Average Planar Exposure M&PLHGR PCT 0xidation (MWD /st) (kW/ft) (*F) Fraction 200 10.90 2089 0.025 1,000 11.00 2090 0.025 5,000 11.50 2126 0.027 10,000 12.10 2199 0.033 15,000 12.10 2198 0.033 20,000 11.90 2197 0.033 25,000 11.50 2157 0.030 30,000 11.00 2072 0.049 35,000 10.30 1977 0.035 40,000 9.70 1879 0.021 45,000 9.00 1777 0.007 NOTE: Credit taken for the effects of pre-pressurization of the fuel rods.

Table 4T MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PIANAR EXPOSURE l

PIANT: Quad Cities 1&2 FUEL TYPE: BP8DRB299L Average Planar .

Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation

(MWD /st) (kW/ft) (*F) Fraction l

200 11.00 2094 0.025 l

i 1,000 11.00 2099 0.026 5,000 11.60 2145 0.029

10,000 12.20 2200 0.033 l 15,000 12.10 2198 0.033

! 20,000 12.00 2197 0.033 25,000 11.50 2139 0.027 30,000 10.90 2067 0.048 35,000 10.30 1973 0.034 40,000 9.70 1876 0.020 45,000 9.00 1776 0.007 i

NOTE: Credit taken for the effects of pre-pressurization of the fuel rods.

~

1 i 4-16

_ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _