ML20148B335

Forwards NEDE-24048, Evaluation of Acoustic Pressure Loads on BWR/6 Internal Components as Addl Info for 251 NSSS & 238 NSSS Gessar Ser.Waiver of Review Fee Requested

ML20148B335
Person / Time
Site:	05000447, 05000531, 05000550
Issue date:	09/29/1978
From:	Quirk J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:	Parr O Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7810310187
Download: ML20148B335 (2)

Text

-

..c.

NUCLEAR ENERGY

. GENER ALh ELECTRIC PROJECTS DIVISION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,175 CURTNER AVE., SAN JOSE, CAUFORNIA 95125 MC 682, (408) 925-2606 MFN 375-78 JFQ 86-78 Sept' ember 29, 1978 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory. Commission

, Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Mr. Olan D. Parr, Chief Light Water Reactors Branch No. 3 Gentlemen:

DOCKET NOS.: STN 50-447, STN-50-550 AND STN-50-531

SUBJECT:

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT NED0-24048,

" EVALUATION OF AC0USTIC PRESSURE LOADS ON BWR/6 INTERNAL COMPONENTS" Fifty copies of the subject report are being submitted as part of the additional technical information required by Item 25, Table 1-3 of the 251 NSSS and 238 NSSS.GESSAR Safety Evaluation Reports. This ir. form 0 tion is being submitted in response to a specific NRC request as part of the GESSAR dockets, ard as such, General Electric considers this report exempt from any fee charges.

Please advise us if you do not agree with this position and return the copies of the subject report. Should you decide to return the report, the information will then be submitted either on OL reviews in support of utility applications, or as part of the Final Design Approval (FDA) stage for GESSAR. This approach is in consort with the. position stated in the GESSAR SERs which state that the review of this matter will be completed at the final-design stage of review.

We would prefer that the review be started now, but we do intend to avoid additional fees. 1This emphasizes how the interpretation of the fee schedule can change the manner in which we have conducted business in the past and can work to the detriment of the principles of stan-dardization. We feel that review of the information now would be for 27103\C V7 wn. h = = :~n'.

. 97to3I o \ R V

. .- - - .. _ . - . . . , . . . - . , ~ . - - , , , . - - .

\ G E N E R AL (@ E LECTRIC U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 the convenience of the staff since more time would be available and sincb review on a generic basis would eliminate duplication on several dockets and would result in savings of time, manpower and paperwork.

We hope that for our mutual benefit and for the benefit of standardization, you can see your way clear to waive fees for this report and for similar reports in the future.

Very truly yours, s[ . tQdi, k,(('l J~ Manager R Standardization Shfety and Licensing Operation JFQ:mm/1335-36 cc: L. S. Gifford (Bethesda Office)

W. F. Kane (NRC) l l

I l

I l

l l

I l