ML20054M233

Comments on Summary of Conditions Imposed by ASLB in Initial Decision on San Onofre 2 & 3, Dtd 820514,in Response to NRC 820615 Request Re Offsite Emergency Preparedness Conditions

ML20054M233
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	07/01/1982
From:	Krimm R Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
TAC-48586, TAC-48587, NUDOCS 8207120134
Download: ML20054M233 (2)

Text

.

4 a *D% , Federal Emergency Management Agency m ,

} [ Washington, D.C. 20472 O O l

l JUL 1 jgE MEMORANDUM FOR: Brian Grimes Director Division of Emergency Preparedness U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission FROM: ., cna r. Arimm Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards

SUBJECT:

Initial Decision (ASLB) on San Onofre 2 and 3 datd May 14, 1982 This responds to the telephone request from Sheldon Schwartz, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to Marshall Sanders, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) on June 15, 1982. He requested our comments on offsite emergency preparedness conditions related to the San Onofre (California) Nuclear Generating station offsite population safety and health. The conditions, stated below, with our comments are those listed in the " Summary of Conditions Imposed by the Atomic Safety Licensing Board in the Initial Decision on San Onofre 2 and 3, dated May 14, 1982," part A.l.and 2. a through h.

Condition: The NRC staff shall certify to the ASLB that the siren i (A.l.) system has been shown to perform in accordance with its technical specifications.

1

- Utility tests of sirens and the rated system including l new or replaced equipment has demonstrated conformance l with the technical specifications.

Condition: The FEHA concerns expressed in the November Update (A.23) Evaluation about lesson plans and schedules have been satsified.

Training plans and activities are well developed and show a coordinated, cooperative effort among the various jurisdictions. These activities should continue to provide a level of training that will furnish an adequate emergency response.

4 0:

04R Condition: Initial training of adequate numbers of onsite and of fsite N (A.2b) personnel in each category listed in Section II.O.4 of NUREG-0654 has been completed, except for radiological mg monitoring teams and radiological analysis personnel g (paragraph 4.C of Section II.O.4).

-u Training of offsite personnel continues on a regular p< schedule with training for radiological monitoring i 0 0: and analysis personnel integrated as appropriate.

N, Numbers of training individuals have increased.

P' Condition: The samo (or an improved) communicat nons syst em t hat (A.2c) was installed at the original interim Emergency Operations facility (EOF) has been Installed at the relocated interim EOF.

An equivalent communications system has been installed in the relocated Interim EOF, Condition: The same (or an improved) set of operating procedures (A.2d) that were adopted for the original Interim Emergency Operations f acility have been adopted for the relocated interim EOF,

- A modified, current and improved set of operating procedures have been adopted for the relocated interim EOF.

Condition: Emergency equipment, suitable for its emergency

( A.2e) purpose, has been purchased and delivered to the of fsite response organization.

- Previously ordered emergency equipment and materials have been de'Ivered to various, appropriate organiza-tions.

Condition: A drill has been conducted to verify the adequacy of (A.2f) the physical design, communications equipment, and operating procedures of the relocated interim EOF.

- This was done on April 15, 1982 and was found to be generally satisfactory.

Condition: FEMA has reviewed and confirmed that the EOF, Of fsite (A.29) Dose Assessment Center (ODAC), and Liason SOPS are adequate.

- These concerns were reviewed and evaluated before and during the April 15, 1982 exercise and found to be adequate.

Condition: Consistency has been achieved in the prewritten (A.2h) instructions for the public in the licensee and j local jurisdiction plans.

- Standardization of operating procedures including l public instructions and materials has been incorporated in all revised plans.

1 i

l l