Nonproprietary Version of App a to Util 810910 Ltr, Summary of Onsite Exams of Farley Optimized Fuel Demonstration Assemblies After One Cycle of Irradiation.ML20041G485 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Farley |
---|
Issue date: |
09/10/1981 |
---|
From: |
ALABAMA POWER CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML19268A893 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 8203220364 |
Download: ML20041G485 (5) |
|
|
---|
Category:GENERAL EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217P0761999-10-0606 October 1999 Non-proprietary, Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs ML20206C9461999-04-30030 April 1999 1:Final Cycle 16 Freespan ODSCC Operational Assessment ML20154H0121998-09-30030 September 1998 Submittal-Only Screening Review of Farley Nuclear Plant IPEEE (Seismic Portion) ML20151V8341998-09-30030 September 1998 Non-proprietary Rev 2 to NSA-SSO-96-525, Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Safety Analysis IR Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change ML20236Y1121998-07-31031 July 1998 Voltage-Based Repair Criteria 90-Day Rept ML20216J6851998-03-16016 March 1998 Revised Pages 58 & 59 to Fnp,Units 1 & 2,Power Uprate Project BOP Licensing Rept ML20197B6391997-12-18018 December 1997 Rev 1 of Jfnp - Unit 1 Pressure Temperature Limits Rept ML20197B6471997-12-18018 December 1997 Rev 1 to Jfnp - Unit 2 Pressure Temperature Limits Rept ML20199G1871997-11-19019 November 1997 Non-proprietary NSD-SAE-ESI-97-647 to SNC Response to NRC RAI on Beloca ML20217Q4211997-08-31031 August 1997 Alternate Repair Criteria 90 Day Rept ML20149K1031997-07-23023 July 1997 Rev 0 to Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 1, P/T Limits Rept ML20149K1051997-07-23023 July 1997 Rev 0 to Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, P/T Limits Rept ML20148R7621997-05-31031 May 1997 Spent Fuel Rack Criticality Analysis Using Soluble Boron Credit ML20141D9721997-05-13013 May 1997 Jm Farley Unit 1 Alternate Plugging Criteria Return to Power Rept ML20135C9811997-02-14014 February 1997 Power Uprate Project BOP Licensing Rept ML20198E8431996-12-31031 December 1996 Non-proprietary Rev 1 to NSA-SSO-96-525, Jm Farley Nuclear Safety Analysis IR Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change ML20137N3991996-12-31031 December 1996 10CFR50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model 1996 Annual Rept HL-6136, L* Criterion for Farley Unit 2 - Non-Proprietary1996-07-25025 July 1996 L* Criterion for Farley Unit 2 - Non-Proprietary L-96-158, Rev 2 to Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 Licensing Rept for TS Changes Associated W/Revised Core Limits,Revised Trip Setpoints & Inclusion of RAOC Control Strategy1996-05-31031 May 1996 Rev 2 to Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 Licensing Rept for TS Changes Associated W/Revised Core Limits,Revised Trip Setpoints & Inclusion of RAOC Control Strategy ML20108D4901996-04-19019 April 1996 Nonproprietary Version of Development of L* Criteria for Farley Unit 2 ML20097C3351996-01-31031 January 1996 Interim Plugging Criteria 90 Day Rept ML20086S4161995-07-31031 July 1995 Interim Plugging Criteria 90 Day Rept. Unit 2 ML20084J6621995-05-18018 May 1995 USI A-46 Summary Rept,Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 1 ML20024J3441994-10-0505 October 1994 1 Cycle 12 IPC Assessment & Projected EOC-13 Slb Leakage. ML20071K9411994-07-31031 July 1994 Pressurizer Safety Line Piping & Support Evaluation Under Safety Valve Discharge Loading Jm Farley Units 1 & 2 ML20059H5211994-01-14014 January 1994 2 Cycle 9 IPC Assessment & Projected EOC-10 Slb Leakage ML20141M3571992-05-31031 May 1992 Pressurizer Safety Line Piping & Support Evaluation Under Safety Valve Discharge Loading,Jm Farley Unit 1 & Unit 2 ML20079M9151991-11-11011 November 1991 Industry Survey in Support of License Renewal Rulemaking Response Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Alabama Power Co ML20217C4191991-03-31031 March 1991 Criticality Analysis of Farley Units 1 & 2 Fresh & Spent Fuel Racks ML20070L8451991-03-14014 March 1991 Joseph M Farley Nuclear Plant Simulator Certification Rept 1991 ML20062F9671990-11-30030 November 1990 Evaluation of Indication in J Farley Unit 2 Steam Generator C Upper Shell to Transition Cone Girth Weld ML20214S2331987-02-28028 February 1987 Demonstration of Conformance of Jm Farley Units 1 & 2 to App K & 10CFR50.46 for Large Break Loca ML20207G5651986-12-29029 December 1986 Crdr Summary Rept, in Response to NUREG-0737,Suppl 1 ML20210K4501986-09-30030 September 1986 Joseph M Farley Units 1 & 2 Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valve Differential Pressures for Auxiliary Feedwater Sys ML20210K4171986-08-31031 August 1986 Joseph M Farley Units 1 & 2 Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valve Differential Pressures for HPCI Sys ML20209D0391986-06-30030 June 1986 Demonstration of Conformance of Jm Farley Units to App K & 10CFR50.46 for Large Break Locas ML20133B2871985-09-16016 September 1985 Containment 5-yr Tendon Surveillance Rept, Vols 1 (Rept) & 2 (Data) ML20137M0331985-08-19019 August 1985 Inryco Post-Tensioning Div Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Anchor Head Investigation Operating Metallurgical Div Investigation 20617 ML20101S6761985-01-31031 January 1985 Design Process of Farley Status Tree Monitoring Sys Displays ML20101S6841985-01-31031 January 1985 Safety Analysis Background for Farley Units 1 & 2,Critical Safety Function Status Tree Monitoring Sys ML20092P3231984-06-29029 June 1984 Reg Guide 1.97, 'Instrumentation for Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants to Assess Plant & Environs Conditions During & Following Accident,' Compliance Rept ML20092G8961984-04-30030 April 1984 Fracture & NDE Evaluations for Closure Flange Regions of Comanche Peak Units 1 & 2 ML20087P8591984-03-30030 March 1984 Reg Guide 1.97 Compliance Rept, Instrumentation for Light Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants to Assess Plant & Environ Conditions During & After Accident, Vols 1-4 ML20087P7821984-03-21021 March 1984 Summary Rept,Nuclear Criticality Reanalysis for 4.3 W/O Fuel in New Fuel Storage Rack ML20080T2851984-01-25025 January 1984 Table of Pressurizer Design Data. Related Info Encl ML20087P9931983-12-31031 December 1983 Control Room Design Review Task Analysis Guideline ML20087P9911983-11-30030 November 1983 Control Room Design Review Survey Development Guideline ML20087P9871983-09-30030 September 1983 Human Engineering Principles for Control Room Design Review ML20087P9841983-07-31031 July 1983 Control Room Design Review Implementation Guideline ML20064G7521982-12-31031 December 1982 Boron Concentration Reduction in Boron Injection Tank, Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2. Proposed Tech Specs Encl 1999-04-30
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217P0761999-10-0606 October 1999 Non-proprietary, Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs ML20217G0361999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20212E7451999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Hcgs,Unit 1.With Summary of Changes,Tests & Experiments Implemented During Aug 1999.With ML20216E4941999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Jmfnp.With ML20210T2161999-08-0606 August 1999 Draft SE Supporting Proposed Conversion of Current TS to ITS for Plant ML20211B2011999-08-0404 August 1999 Informs Commission About Results of NRC Staff Review of Kaowool Fire Barriers at Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 & Staff Plans to Address Technical Issues with Kaowool & FP-60 Barriers ML20210R6031999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20196J3791999-06-30030 June 1999 Safety Evaluation of TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at Westinghouse 3-Loop Pwrs. Rept Acceptable ML20209G0661999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With L-99-267, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With L-99-023, Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Jfnp Units 1 & 2. with1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Jfnp Units 1 & 2. with ML20206G7471999-05-0404 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Corrective Actions Taken by SNC to Ensure That Valves Perform Intended Safety Functions & Concluding That SNC Adequately Addressed Requested Actions in GL 95-07 L-99-020, Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20206C9461999-04-30030 April 1999 1:Final Cycle 16 Freespan ODSCC Operational Assessment L-99-161, Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205N0961999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20204D7271999-03-15015 March 1999 ISI Refueling 15,Interval 2,Period 3,Outage 3 for Jm Farley Nuclear Generating Plant,Unit 1 ML20207M6421999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20203A2651999-01-31031 January 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Jan 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20199D8611999-01-12012 January 1999 SER Accepting Relief Request for Inservice Insp Program for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20199E6591998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20206C8081998-12-31031 December 1998 Alabama Power 1998 Annual Rept ML20198K4091998-12-18018 December 1998 COLR for Jm Farley,Unit 1 Cycle 16 ML20198B2561998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20195E2281998-11-16016 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Request for Second 10-year ISI Program Relief Request 56 for Plant,Unit 1 ML20195C9681998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20155E0271998-10-29029 October 1998 SER Approving & Denying in Part Inservice Testing Program Relief Requests for Plant.Relief Requests Q1P16-RR-V-3 & Q2P16-RR-V Denied Since Requests Do Not Meet Size Requirement of GL 89-04 ML20154B6121998-10-0101 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting Second 10-year ISI Requests for Relief RR-13 & RR-49 Through RR-55 for Jm Farley NPP Unit 1 ML20151V8341998-09-30030 September 1998 Non-proprietary Rev 2 to NSA-SSO-96-525, Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Safety Analysis IR Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change ML20154H6001998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20154H0121998-09-30030 September 1998 Submittal-Only Screening Review of Farley Nuclear Plant IPEEE (Seismic Portion) ML20197C8991998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20237C5471998-08-20020 August 1998 Suppl to SE Re Amends 137 & 129 to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8, Respectively.Se Being Supplemented to Incorporate Clarifications/Changes & Revise Commitment for Insp of SG U-bends in Rows 1 & 2 for Unit 2 Only ML20236Y1121998-07-31031 July 1998 Voltage-Based Repair Criteria 90-Day Rept ML20237B1891998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20237A2181998-07-24024 July 1998 Jm Farley Unit 2 ISI Rept Interval 2,Period 3 Outage 1, Refueling Outage 12 ML20236U6141998-07-23023 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Use of Alternative Alloy 690 Welds (Inco 52 & 152) as Substitute for Other Weld Metal ML20236R8671998-07-0909 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Southern Nuclear Operating Co USI A-46 Implementation Program Has Met Purpose & Intent of Criteria in GIP-2 & Staff SSER-2 on GIP-2 for Resolution of USI A-46 ML20236M5981998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20154H0461998-06-30030 June 1998 Technical Evaluation Rept on Review of Farley Nuclear Plant IPEEE Submittal on High Winds,Flood & Other External Events (Hfo) ML20248M3121998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20247F3631998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20217D2591998-04-21021 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Proposed Alternative Re Augmented Exam of Reactor Vessel Shell Welds for Plant ML20247E8851998-03-31031 March 1998 FNP Unit 2 Cycle 13 Colr ML20217H3191998-03-31031 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to Plant Matl Surveillance Programs ML20216D5941998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1998 for Joseph M Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20217D4081998-03-24024 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to Maintain Calibration Info Required by ANSI N45.2.4-1972 ML20216H6731998-03-17017 March 1998 SER Accepting Quality Assurance Program Description Change for Joseph M Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20216J6851998-03-16016 March 1998 Revised Pages 58 & 59 to Fnp,Units 1 & 2,Power Uprate Project BOP Licensing Rept ML20216D9811998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
ENCLOSURE 2 [ Non-proprietary version of APCo September 10, 1981 letter . Appsndix A]
APPEliDIX A SultMARY OF Orl-SITE EXAriIfATI0 tis OF FARLEY OPTIllIZED FUEL DE110flSTRATI0fi ASSEliBLIES AFTER OrlE CYCLE OF IRPADIATION IllTRODUCTIO!!
Farley Unit 1 completed its second cycle of operation in t'ovember 1980.
The core loading for this cycle included two 17x17 optimized fuel demonstration assemblies (OFDAs) located in core positions A8 and R8.
During the refueling shutdown, the two 0FDAs were non-destructively examined to determine their overall integrity and to generally assess the one cycle performance of the optimized fuel. This report presents the key results of the examinations.
VISUAL EXAMINATI0il 0F ASSEMBLIES Detailed visual examinations at the J. M. Farley plant revealed that the two optimized fuel demonstration assemblies (OFDAs) were in excellent condition after one cycle of irradiation, with no significant anomalies noted. All fuel rods, grids, and nozzles were intact and structurally sound. The visible surfaces of the rods and grids were predominately lustrous, suggesting little or no crud deposition during the cycle.
With specific regard to the grids, the visual inspections showed that they were mechanically sound, with no evidence of grid tearing, severe abrasion, missing pieces of straps, or hangup with adjacent grids. There were no i reported incidents of assembly hangup or overloads during removal of the OFDAs from the core. Furthermore, no buckling, indentation, weld deterioration or adverse effects from adjacent standard grids were seen.
flany of the Zircaloy grids showed patterns of varying luster outlining the shape of adjacent narrower Inconel grids. On the lower edges of several Zircaloy grids vehich faced the core baffle, superficial dark areas were seen. fone of these conditions is judged to be detrimental to the overall performance of the grids. The Zircaloy grids also showed no evidence of unusual corrosion or local hydriding in particular the visible portions 8203220364 820315 PDR ADOCK 05000348 P PDR
of laser welds and heat affected zones. These observations are consistent with those made on the Salem optimized fuel demonstration assemblies.
Thus performance of the grids from the standpoint of corrosion is expected and is acceptable.
The maximum observed channel closure (fuel rod bow) in the Farley 0FDAs was
[ ] percent, approximately the same as for the Salem demo assemblies. +(b,c)
Frequency distributions of the overall channel closure data revealed a standard deviation of [ ] percent and a worst span 95th percentile closure +(b,c) of [ ] percent, which are slightly lower than those in the Salem 0FAs. +(b,c)
The Farley channel closures are within the data base of all standard 17x17 fuel at comparable burnups and well below the licensing limit, as shown in Figure 1.
The fuel rod-to-nozzle axial clearance data showed that, as in the Salem 1 0FDAs, none of the fuel rods were close to the bottom nozzle, with '
clearances of at least [ ] inch. Clearances at the top end of the rods +(b,c) j were significantly greater than at the bottom and exhibited little change from as-built clearances. The sum of the axial clearances at the bottom and top ends were compared with pre-irradiation values and showed net -
decreases (indicative of fuel rod growth) cf [ ] inch, with +(b,c) the greater changes in the higher burnup rods, as expected. These changes ,
are consistent with previous observations at other plants on standard 17x17 fuel, where higher burnup (fast fluence) rods exhibit greater axial I
. growth.
Grid width data are still being evaluated. Preliminary assessment indicates that the grid growth is within acceptable limits.
BREAKAWAY AND WITHCRAWAL FORCE MEASUREMENTS Breakaway and withdrawal force measurements for 20 removable rods from ,
Farley indicate [ ] than in +(b,c) j standard 17x17 designs. Overall relaxation of all eight grids, based on breakaway-forces averaged for the 20 rods, was [ ] percent. For standard +(b,c) l Inconel grids, overall relaxation at this burnup.has been measured at
- i< . .
i
[ ] percent. From withdrawal force data remaining spring forces in +(b,c) the Zircaloy grids are estimated to be in the range of [ ] lb. +(b c) per grid. The data show that relaxation of the Zircaloy grids was less than predicted and some positive contact was maintained on the fuel rods, contrary to expectation. The results indicate more margin in grid spring design than anticipated.
VISUAL EXAf11HATIO!1 0F REMOVABLE FUEL RODS Detailed video examination of 20 individual removable fuel rods, 10 from i each of the Farley demonstration assemblies, revealed that the rods were in good condition and showed no evidence of any fretting wear in areas of grid dimple or spring contact. The grid contact areas were generally distinguishable by a burnished, light-colored appearance, with no depth.
In addition, the conta'ct areas at the Zircaloy grids appeared to be essentially the same as at Inconel grids, except for slightly more pronounced markings in the case of the Inconel grids.
i Absence of fretting wear was confirmed by eddy current scanning of four of the removable rods from Assembly ZD-3. The eddy current scans showed no signals at the grid spring dimple contact points.
l PROFILONETRY OF REMOVABLE RODS Profilometer data of three removable rods from assembly ZD-3 revealed an average creepdown of [ ] mils, with a maximum of [ ] mils,overthe +(b,c) high power region of the rods. Ovality was typically less than [ ] mil +(b,c)
'but locally as high as [ ] mils. fio periodic ridging of the type +(b,c) associated with pellet interfaces at higher burnup was observed. Detailed computer code analysis has not yet been performed. However, preliminary assessment indicates that the fuel clad creepdown is consistent with .
design expectations.
j CONCLUSIONS l The post-irradiation examinations have verified the excellent performance l of the 0FDAs in their first irradiation cycle. Specifically, the overall integrity of the 0FA fuel was maintained, no evidence of fuel rod fretting wear was detected in grid contact locations, Zircaloy grid l
4 spring relaxation was less than expected, fuel rod bow is well within the licensing basis, and no unusual dimensional changes in fuel rods were noted. liore detailed evaluation is in progress.
") . -
c, b
(
+
5
)
_ c, b
(
0
- t- 8 3 .
e r
u s
l o
C l
) e c, n 2 n b
(
a -
h
+ C
- ) e
_ U T
l i
H t n -
- _ /
D e U c M r i0 e .
2 P -
3 0 h .
1 t X 5
( 9 p n u a n p -
r S -
5 l u
i I 1 t s
r o
W 1
e r
g u
- 0 1 i F
" _ i 5 2
';0 8 6 4 0 0
O 0 0 1 0 E'A 3, o . e' c ~ dj i<
- il "1.' ; e h i.'. i "
_