ML111930586

Initial Exam Retake 2011-301 Final Administrative Documents

ML111930586
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	06/02/2011
From:	NRC/RGN-II
To:	Laughlin G Florida Power & Light Co
References
ES-201
Download: ML111930586 (4)

Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 10/25/2010 Initials Item Task Description a b* 4 1 a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401,. MA*

W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

T d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

E N

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s transients. p444 I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M mix of applicants inaccordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at L least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examnations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at Least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

L f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RD or SRO).

4 ri ted N e/S ature gate,

a. Author Greg Laughlin! Z(llfU

b. Facility Reviewer (*) J?hn Eaton / 1/

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) , 2-- i

d. NRC Supervisor L4LCLA t.

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

1ThL t-ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of L as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an, enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowege, 1 did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) oø(41(f. From the date that I entered intO this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those apphcants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

2. Mi4A7. !5LLL 3.&fl.Lei-.ti1 &ir.rcr O-.

4 kqJ I 4iTi *:.

. ..: Jf/f , -

1 SSv /

7. 4 - w6

8. 4.Jic C_o 4u[i L-(\. Vi.ii

. c i-A ,-

V

10. C)Al S 4 r\IWr . 3--l frc5 13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-J Facility: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 03/04/20 11 Exam Level: SRO (I) Operating Test Number: 201 1-301 Administrative Topic Type Code Describe Activity to be performed (See Note) (See Note)

A. l.a Determineticense Status (Active/Inactive) V.

CR N Conduct of Operations 2.1.ISRO4.2 Maintain Operations Key Log. V A.l.b CR,N Conduct of Operations V 2.1.29 S.RO 4.0 V

V V Review Boric Acid Pmp Discharge Valve Clearance A V

. CRD Equipment Control V V

V 2.2 13 SRO 3.8

., Determine the Airborne Activity Dose Rate V A.

CRM V V

Radiation Control 2.3.4 SRO 3.1 V

V C1assify Event and Determine PARS V V

A.4 Emergency V

V

- *V CR N V Procedures/Plan 2.441 SRO 4.6 V V V

V V

NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.

Types and Codes (C) Control Room (5) Simulator (CR) Classroom (D)irect from bank (3 for ROs, 4 for SROs)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (1)

(P)reious 2 Exams (1 Randomly selected)

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 10/25/2010 Operating Test Number:201 0-301 Initials

1. General Criteria

. a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with g.)J ,

sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). 14 i4 rI

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination. -

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D. l.a.) -

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. -

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent V

/ I f applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria -- --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

• initial conditions

• initiating cues

• references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-20l -2.

3. Simulator Criteria -- --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ,J/

ES-30l-4 and a copy is attached.

))4 Printed Name / Sig ture Date

a. Author Greg Laughlin! 3 13 1

b. Facility Reviewer(*) John Eaton! .//7 /1 c.

d.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

NRC Supervisor JJ&j-ç G. -

itir-1 NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.