ML19275G953

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Exam Administrative Items (ADAMS-2D)
ML19275G953
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/02/2019
From:
NRC/RGN-II
To:
References
Download: ML19275G953 (19)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Turkey Point Date of Examination: 07/22/2019 Developed by: Written: Facility NRC // Operating: Facility NRC Chief Target Task Description (Reference) Examiners Date*

Initials

1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a-b). For NRC-prepared exams, 11/24 arrangements are made for the facility to submit reference materials (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3).

12/24 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.f).

3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c). As applicable, the facility 12/24 contact submits to the NRC any prescreened K/As for elimination from the written examination outline, with a description of the facilitys prescreening process (ES-401, D.1.b).

12/24 4. Reference material due for NRC-prepared exams (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3).

12/24 5. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.e).

6. NRC-developed written examination outline (ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2 and ES-401-3 or 1/8 ES-401N-3) sent to facility contact (must be on the exam security agreement) (C.1.e-f; C.2.h; C.3.d-e).
7. Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, 2/22 ES-301-2, ES-301-5, and ES-D-1, as applicable (C.1.e-f; C.3.d-e).
8. Operating test outline(s) reviewed by the NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; 3/8 C.3.d-e).
9. Proposed examinations (written, JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable) and outlines (Forms ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2, and ES-401-3 or ES-401N-3);

05/08 supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-401-6, ES-401N-6, and any Form ES-201-2 and ES-201-3 updates); and reference materials due (C.1.e-h; C.3.d).

10. Examinations prepared by the NRC are approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded for 05/08 facility licensee review (C.1.i; C.2.h; C.3.f-g).

05/23 11. Preliminary waiver/excusal requests due (C.1.m; C.2.c; ES-202).

05/13 12. Written exam and operating test reviews completed (C.3.f).

13. Examination review results discussed between the NRC and facility licensee (C.1.i; C.1.k-l; 6/17 C.2.h; C.3.g). The NRC and the facility licensee conduct exam preparatory week.
14. Preliminary license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398) due 6/22 (C.1.m; C.2.i; ES-202).
15. Final license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398), due and 7/8 Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.m; C.2.k; ES-202).

7/15 16. Written examinations and operating tests approved by the NRC supervisor (C.2.j-k; C.3.h).

7/15 17. Request facility licensee management feedback on the examination (C.2.l).

18. Final applications reviewed; one or two (if more than 10) applications audited to confirm 7/15 qualifications/eligibility; and examination approval and waiver/excusal letters sent (C.2.k; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.3.j; ES-204).

7/15 19. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k).

7/15 20. Approved scenarios and job performance measures distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i).

  • Target dates are based on facility-prepared examinations and the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. These dates are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

L-19-1 NRC EXAM SECURE INFORMATION ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Turkey Point (PTN) Date of Examination: 7/22/19 Operating Test No.:

2019-302 APPLICANTS SRO-I RO BOP Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 3 4 5 1 3 4 5 1 3 4 5 Interpret/Diagnose Events 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 and Conditions Comply with and 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,2,4 1,2,3 3,4,5 1,5,6 2,3,4, 1,2,5 1,2,3 1,3,4 5,6 4,5,6 6 7,8 5,6 6 6 7,8 Boards (2)

Communicate 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 and Interact Demonstrate 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply with and 1,3,4 1,3,4 2,3 2,5,6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Use TS (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES 303 1 and ES 303 3 describe the competency rating factors.)

ES-301-6 pg 1 of 1

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Turkey Point Date of Exam: 7/22/19 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 /4/5 Operating Test No.:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, PGC but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. PGC
3. Each event description consists of the following: PGC
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable)
4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. PGC
5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete PGC evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. N/A NA Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. PGC
8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance PGC deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. PGC
10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the PGC form along with the simulator scenarios).
11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable PGC rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified PGC on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when PGC PGC possible.
14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1/1/1/1/1 PGC
2. Abnormal events (2-4) 4/6/4/5/5 PGC
3. Major transients (1-2) 1/1/1/1/1 PGC
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/2/2/2/2 PGC
5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (> 1 per scenario 0/1/1/0/0 PGC set)
6. Preidentified critical tasks (> 2) 2/2/2/2/2 PGC
  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; chief examiner concurrence is required.

L-19-1 NRC EXAM SECURE INFORMATION ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Turkey Point (PTN) Date of Exam: 7/22/19 Operating Test No.: 2019-302 A E Scenarios P V 3 5 1 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION I

C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P M(*)

T P E R I U RX 1 1 1 NOR 2 1 1 RO-1 I/C 1,2 5,6 3,4 6 4 MAJ 5 7 5 3 2 TS 0 0 RX 1 1 1 NOR 2 1 1 RO-2 I/C 1,2 5,6 3,4 6 4 MAJ 5 7 5 3 2 TS 0 0 RX 3* 1 1 NOR 2 1 1 RO-3 1,2 3,4 4,5 6 4 I/C MAJ 5 5 6 3 2 TS 0 0 RX 2 1 1 NOR 1 1 1 RO-4 I/C 3,4 1,4 1,2,3 7 4 MAJ 7 5 6 3 2 TS 0 0 RX 2 1 1 NOR 1 1 1 SROI-1 I/C 1,2 3,4 1,4 8 4 3,4 MAJ 5 7 5 3 2 TS 1,3,4 3 2 RX 1 2 2 1 NOR 1* 1 1 SROI-2 I/C 2,3 1,2 1,3,4 10 4 4 3,4 MAJ 5 7 5 3 2 TS 2,5,6 1,3,4 6 2 ES-301-5 pg 1 of 2

L-19-1 NRC EXAM SECURE INFORMATION ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 A E Scenarios P V 3 5 1 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION I

C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P M(*)

T P E R I U RX 2 1 1 NOR 1 1 1 SROI-3 I/C 1,2 3,4 1,4 8 4 3,4 MAJ 5 7 5 3 2 TS 1,3,4 3 2 RX 1 2 2 1 NOR 1* 1 1 SROI-4 I/C 2,3 1,2 1,3,4 10 4 4 3,4 MAJ 5 7 5 3 2 TS 2,5,6 1,3,4 6 2 RX 1 2 2 1 NOR 1* 1 1 SROI-5 I/C 2,3,4 5,6 1,3,4 8 4 MAJ 5 7 5 3 2 TS 1,3,4 1,3,4 6 2 RX 1 1 1 NOR 1* 1 1 SROI-6 I/C 2,3 1,2 1,2,3 12 4 4 3,4 4,5 MAJ 5 7 6 3 2 TS 2,5,6 2,3 5 2 RX 1 NOR 1 SROI-7 I/C 4 MAJ 2 TS 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301-5 pg 2 of 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19275G953&oldid=1975569"