ML20024H215

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:32, 12 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 91-003-00:on 910429,charging Sys Check Valve 1-370 Discovered W/Leakage in Excess of Limits Due to Worn Disc Arm Bushing Steps.Worn Disc Arm Bushing Steps Cladded W/ E308 Weld Matl & Hand Filed to Design contour.W/910521 Ltr
ML20024H215
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/21/1991
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
CON-NRC-91-048, CON-NRC-91-48 LER-91-003, LER-91-3, VPNPD-91-165, NUDOCS 9105300234
Download: ML20024H215 (5)


Text

= __ . . - - - - . - _,_m__= . . - = . _ . _ . - . . . _ - _ _ . . . _ _ . . - . - - . . . _ . _..

  • I I.

~

~

Wisconsin l

Electnc 1 POWER COMPANY 231 w M,engan>o Em 20e t,wcaee w 53201 (410 221-2345 i VPNPD-91 165 10 CFR 50.73 NRC 0 4 8 May 21,-1991 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Document Control Desk Mail Station F1-137 Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

DOCKETS 50-266 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 91-003-00 CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVE LEAKAGE IN EXCESS OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LIMITS EOINT BEACH JUCLEAP PLANT, UNIT 1 Enclosed is Licensee Event Report 91-003-00 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. This report is provided in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (i) , "Any operation or condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications."

This report details the failure of a containment isolation valve to pass local leak rate tests at a level required by Technical Specifications.

If further information is required, please contact us.

Very truly yours, gi s' .Iff C..W. Fay Vice President Nuclear Power Enclosure Copies to NRC Regional Administrator, Region III NRC Resid'nt Inspector g y,3 9105300234 910521 Illi PDR ADOCK 05000266

.4 wan!bn ofIlhynsn Energ, Dmuu!wn

u . , a A . u, m . ,0. , w . .. ,0~

E.C sv ,0.p A,.,,,,, _ s , m , ,,

i shnli 4 M 9 I t *,'sV A t k i .JNOt N #f B HI LP0N 5 f TO COMeif nH 1H S uCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) S.s'8v"fs','s.'.C/M.

e ni w 13 v a ' " ' a'd,'.s1,"L.s c- i m t. s .m .

.i,',','c bl OM A 90h v (( YY'LuON W A$HAN3? D% DC Nt% AND1D 1Mi F At t H e'A s. e f DL C T EON 6 6*0.et ( 1 r .1

  • L 4 14. i 06 t ict De ve%aOl vlNT AN? peDOt 1 W AEn%f 0N DC 20s,,('l f GCitiTT h AME til ~iKX.S t f 4JWBt h 42 4 P AUI IJ POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT 015101010121616 1 l0Fl 014 fif t h i4' CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVE LEAKAGE IN EXCESS OF TECH SPEC I,I M I TS 9 vthi DAf t Ili Li m h vMat a t.1 atPOmf Da f t ifi OTHE A E AC#L8118 8 thVO4 W S D '8-MO%1H Car t i a.t vta6 S lg Q' ,* * [' voNin Det stae 'ain f' A*wts den t t huvst a 1 0 16 1010 1 0 1 1 I O!4 2l9 9 1 9(1 0l 0} 3 0l 0 0l 5 2l1 9l1 0 1 6 1 0poici ; l 5 -s t.o., in n ews n o v iva a %, t o t al n.au .i ut ~ n o. io c a i o. . m .. -. . .. <.. ~ , o n Moot'o N n .. -, n..., .c n,, , a n .. , n ni.i

,oot= n ..uom .o u . n i , io n,.us m., n n ..,

ov(, - - -

no. i ;O n a .nm.,i so n .ua, ie u. o r m.o mt= .. g.,..-,

n m .nua X sa n.a u n ~ > . . .... . . a ,

.o.,. . . .s4 : - ,.Cr .-

, a. ..,s no a uni,, so n .uau .o n . ua . . ...- .

a = ,. 4 m.i so n nz o o ic n . y .. . ,

LICt h81i C0%f AO' f Om twg g l e 113, b*t St .t.%%t %<We t h C. W. Fay, Vice President, Nuclear Power **Lacm 41114 2l2111-12181111 COM*t t Tt ONE 6 <%t 50# t a M CDw*oht %1 f At54* t Ot &CR'e tD th f ool ot roe t i t s.

caw $8 $vlity ODY ONENT ( . p g, f{ C e cit 5* 5'i v COvPONt%1 , ,, { I X BDt i l i SVV0 t 1 ! 85 Y i i i ! l i i

! I I ! 1 I !  !  ! l ! I I i Sve*L E WE NT AL alPont t uficilD ne v?N' ' Oev itaa i=

5..Pt: tac

. isas v ti ! r .: raea .r. f of f ?f f 5 5 # W $3,0% Cd 'f N9 g l as 1. .cv . . .. w ..x .. ..,,...,,e..,.....,..,,.. - n.

ABSTRACT:

On April 29, 1991, during Appendix J, Type C containment leak l rate testing, charging system check valve 1-370 was disecvered with leakage in excess of limits cited in Technical Specifications 15.4.4.II.B and 15.4.4.III.B. In this case, the required test pressure could not be achieved; therefore, a leak for design basis conditions could not be quantified.

The valve was repaired, tested and restored to operation. This

, report is filed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (1) , "Any operation l or condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications."

l I

wacte<= M4,tes

, ,g o.u na v i =vetcan aiw.aica, coue,mos

,,,,, ~~y a mats xv

- LlCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)  !?,'3^'N;f,;3'M"J'Jen,'*,,!f"2,' .*#.'.O

("'"'"'"***"**"' '"'"""'"

TEXT CONTINUATION

'EI'2/d' 7/v'w'd "c '?. U.'.YcM. "li EA e"".'JE E U;'un313 "l n"e,',':? '&M?%C""

. .m . , , s... n , ca . . , ~ vo. . # n , s uo.. ,,, ,.

i.= "M;# Wig POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT 015101010l21616 911 -

Ol0l3 -

010 0 12 0' 0 14 now ~ ...,a. ~ ucw w.mn EVENT DESCRIPTION:

On April 6, 1991, Unit 1 was shut down for annual refueling and maintenance outage No. 18. On April 29, 1991, excessive leakage was discovered through the charging system regenerative heat exchanger supply check valve (1-370). The leakage past valve 1-370 appeared to exceed the leak rata limit of 0.6 La, the -

maximum Icakage allowed by Technical Specification 15.4.4.II.B and 15.4.4.III.B.

Valve 1-370 was tested according to Operations Refueling Test 34.

As the piping under test reached 20 psig, the leakage was quantified at 227,000 sccm. It is conservatively assumed that l the leakage would have been greater had the required test pressure of 65 psig been achieved.

Leakage from all remaining valves tested within Technical Specification limits. Excluding valve 1-370, the total "as-found" leakage for Type "B" and "C" local leak rate testing amounted to 6924 sccm or 3% of the Technical Specification allowance.

COMPONENT A@ SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS:

Valve 1-370 is a 3-inch, 1500 pound class, Gr 316 stainless

(

steel, swing check valve. It is a Model B10-4114C-11NB, Drawing 78409 and was manufactured by Velan Engineering Companies. It is located inside of containment in the charging supply line to the regenerative heat exchanger. It has been in service since commercial operation began in December 1970.

, Piping on the supply and discharge sides of the check valve is l stainless steel cnd has a design rating of 2500 psig at 130'F.

Additional isolation capability for this piping is provided by either remotely operated valves 1-1298 and 1-296 inside of containment, or manually operated valves 1-384B and 1-323B outside of containment. Operator action would be required to shut each of these valves if they were needed to establish l

containment isolation.

l

~

_cm ,em a.s,x _

v. ~ m ... m .,u ,co -

g,c,3 m. .os so us .n LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) lsll:^o'.'UJM "'h"lM',,'S!f 02 ,*#.'J'!

5 e TEXT CONTINUATION M "# 45,';'/o'! O W 3',tl y'.7'/l # Ui' "!! U !

0, v s.a . s an oci .

W ';,=2,".w.s?,n*.,"2.R?'n#2 30~ o u'a?

m 2  ;

,acistiv h.wt m DOC A L , hvMh 4 M J !

gg a gvuglR 66r '.G4 4

i * = "ette C3,3 POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT 0l5l0l0l0l2l6l6 9l1 -

0l0l3 -

0 10 0 l3 0' 014 now-u.~. ,a..m mecw.m a CAUSES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

Engineering and Maintenance personnel conducted a detailed root cause analysis. The results of the analysis indicated the disc arm bushing steps had worn during the course of normal operation.

The wear allowed binding at the ninge connection which prevented disc arm movement and caused the disc to remain open. There was no notable wear on the hanger bracket bushing steps.

Corrective action consisted of cladding the worn disc arm bushing steps with E308 weld material and hand filing the steps to their design contour, a repair method that was reviewed and approved by the valve manufacturer's engineering department. The weld integrity was verified by liquid penetrant examination. The valve was reassembled and tested. Post maintenance leakage was found to be 32 standard cubic centimeters per minute. The check valve was restored to operation May 3, 1991.

In addition, preventive maintenance inspections for this valve and the corresponding valve in Unit 2 are planned at 5 year intervals to detect and correct any future degradation.

9_FJERIC IMPLICATIONS:

There have been no generic implications identified at this time.

Point Beach Unit 2 has an identical component and applic tion.

Operations testing of this component will be conducted d.. ring the

! refueling outage scheduled to commence September 27, 1991.

REPORTABILITY:

The licensee event report is filed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (i) , "Any operation or condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications."

The Energy. Industry Identification System component Iunction l identifier and system names of each valve and system referred to in this LER are:

Valve No.: 1-370 System: BD Component: ISV NRC Fore 26A IMP'

I gy.v , . . m . . . . . m . , e . , - ,-

,, ,,,,, ,,,,, ,,,, ,, j

,, ...u.wn 1 LlCENSEE EVENT REPORT {LER) ' 5.'j%',',',V,;7'N',%"' $;si'o'C;,!f",'.V ,*c'".'",l' j

' * ' f."f!

TEXT CONTINUATlON SU*,'i i' n'A'/&"nMU'.t!"J**,jN"i W

o, o.i'?A'4?".,ri'53.v,%*,'!;;n, s.a e w na , ..  ;.?M%*#

.n oc m.a0?R

. ACttif _v h.W4 til DOCEt,IvuMSLA Q' L4 R hpM94 R (S' P. 04 13 i.a "etg." Tf;.',3 POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT 0F 0 l5 l0 l3 l0 l2 l6 l6 9 11 0l 0l 3 -

0l0 0 l4 0 l4 t on m m . - . . $ c <- a. .o n, SAFETY ASSESSMENT:

Operation of Unit 1 during the last fuel cycle posed no significant safety hazard to the general public or to the employees of the Point Beach Nuclear Plant. Alternate means of remotely isolating the piping system inside containment was available to operators. The capability of local, manual isolation outside containment also exists.

SIMILAR OCCURRENCFJ:

Investigations of plant maintenance, the Nuclear Plant Reliability Database (NPRDS) and past LERs have revealed that valve 1-370 had three previous failures. The most recent occurred in April 1989 and contributed to the total as-found leakage cited in LER 266-89-002. One other involving leakage past valve 1-370 is described in LER 266-83-009. The remaining Unit 1 failure involved a violation of plant leakage administrative limits and is the subject of an NPRDS report filed in September 1978.

Similar occurrences in Unit 2 included a single routine corrective maintenance action in response to leakage in excess of plant administrative limits. This event is also the subject of an NPRDS report filed in November 1990.

_