ML13004A254

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:17, 6 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 58 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 122 of 467
ML13004A254
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Miktus P
Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Southern Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2267 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML13004A254 (65)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of X*'

Status: Yl*NE- UO Checklist (SWC)

Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID No. Q2EI6HOO3B ýEquip. Class' 10 Equipment l)escription RHR*PU1Pl BOOM COOLER'2B ,

Location: Bldg..AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 2129 Manufacturer.Model, Etc. (optional but recommentded).

Instructions tor Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document thteresults of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment oh the SWEL. The spice below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgmients and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist-for docutnenting other comments.

Anchorage 1, Is the anehomtge configuraiibn verification required (ie., iý the itetii one VIJ Ne-l of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hard(vare?

YZNE, Uri NIALIJ 31 Is the anchorage free of corrosiotn that is more than mild surface YV Nn U-J N/AEl oxidation?

4. Is the ainchotage free of visible cracks it the concrete near, the anchors?

YF1 NO2 UD NAKQ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note; This question only, applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configurattion verification is required.)

6, RBased on the above~rimhorage evaluations, is the anchdriage free of Y /N0 U*C potentially advere, seistic conditions?

IEnter the ajiir class nane from, Appendix W Classes of Equtpifent, Page 58 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 rF2-Q9 Sheet 2 Ofe 05 Status: Y21I/N-] uEi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16HQ038 Equip. Class, 10

  • Equipment Description RHRPUMPFROOM COOLER2B Interaction Effects
7. Are soft taTgels free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yýý[] UCI N/AD 8; Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo[*] U{] NIAD and masonry. block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

damageI

9. Do attacbed lines have adequate flexibility to avoid $N0, I,* N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free 40, NE U[C]

of potentially Adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions jil Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YtNil] U[C]

adversely affect the safety:functions of the equipiment' Comments (Additional pages-may be added as ne-essary)

Evaluated"by: 4/4AL - Date: . 2-- ,

" O" ' //4 1712:3 1211 z I/

Page 59 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 60 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 61 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 62 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of/ tilsI4ov Status: YZ NIZ UI-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16HOQ4A Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CCW PUMPROOM COOLER TRAIN A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2185 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

COOLER IS MOUNTED TO CEILING AND IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO VERIFY WELDS TO EMBEDDED STEEL IN CEILING

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NI U0 N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED ND UF] N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI U[-D N/AD1
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[- ND U0 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

U212563 REV 0 (9-26-03) - UNABLE TO VERIFY

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN ND1 UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 63 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1 0*0 Sheet. 2 of i It/10/fua-Status: YZ N- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16HOO4A Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Description CCW PUMPROOM COOLER T RAIN A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U- N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NO U-1 N/A-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UFD N/A[D
10. Based on the,above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U-ofpotentiallyadverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[D] US adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AREA WALK-BY FOR ROOM 2185 IS IN FOLDER F2-79 (Q2P17HOO1B)

Evaluated by: TERRY A MULLENIX I Date: Ii l3/~I2..

MCLAY i Ter, oA)

I Page 64 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 65 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 66 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 67 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 tr%'

Page 68 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet id f 3 Status: ti*<N LU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

'Equipment ID No. Q2E16H05BI Equip, Class' 10 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMPROOM COOLER 2B iLocatibn: Bldg AUXILIARY Flbor El. 100 Room, Area 2 - ?&'Z Manufactuirer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipmeit on the SWE.L. The space beloweach of the foliowing questions may he used to record the results otfjudgments:and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other coumednts, I- Is the anehorage configuration verification required (iýe, is the item one YD N*/

of the'50%:of SWEL items requtiing such verificationt)?

2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3, Is the anchorage free of corrosion ,that is more than mild surface YO'ND UD NIAD]

oxidation?

  • []UD N/AD
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant docqumentation? YO ND ULD NIAE!K (Note: Thi 's question only applies if the item is one ofthe 50% for which ats anchorage configuration verification is reqiuired.)

6ý Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NDU potentially adverse:seismic conditios?

1E3mr fficequipmunt class name frota Appendix B;:Classas'oflquipmiits Page 69 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet2 Of3 Status: YfnL U01 Seismic Walkdown. Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. W2E16HO058. Eqdip. Class, 10.

Equipment Description AUXFEEWA TER PUMPROOM COOLER 28 .. .. _ ,:.

nteraction Effects N A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEN UI- N/A 8.. Are overhead equipmentt, distribution systems, ceiiing tiles andiighting, ':VI N/A,0'I and masonry block ý,a ij.i t likely to d011apse 6hto the.equipment?
9. Do at*ched lines have'adetuate flexibility to avoiddamage? NO U-1 NIA
10. Based on the above tismin interaction evaluations,.is equipment free Y[-N4 UE]

of potenltially adverse. seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse,Conditious It. Have you looked for and tbundno other seismic conditions that cmiold Y2-N UF]

adversely affect the safty:%functions of the equipment?

Conmmenits (Addihional pages may be added'as necessary)

Evaluated by: SziLJA

,d/

A L..te

/zf ae:~ 9 1 Page 70 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 i NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 71 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of'q-Status: Y9j'NI-j UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16H0O7 Eqwip Equipment Description MCC 2A ROOM COOLEF Location: Bjdg. AUXILIARY Floor EL 139 Room, Area. 2 Manufacturer, Model, Efc. (optiotial but recorm~iended) instructions for Completing Checklist Th s checklist may be used to document the results of the Seisimic Walkdown of an item of quipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following quiestions may be used to record the results ofjudginents and findings, Additional space is provided at the.eddbfthis checklist.fdr documenting other conunents.

Ancho*afe 1, 1s the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N' of the 50% of SWEI items requifring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED UD N/AD Y gfND UI] N!AD2
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?'
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracksin ihe concretenear the anchors? Y2 ND UD N/AD
5. Isthe anchorage configuration consistent withplant documentation? YO ND UD N`/As/

(Note: This question~only applies if the iten is one ofthe50% for which an anchorage configuration veiificationis required.)

6, Based onthe above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yl*/ ND1 UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter~the equipmem class name from AppendiX B: Classes o'Eqaipnent, Page 72 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofl4 status: Y,' N(r- UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16H07 .. Equip, Class, 10 Equipment.Description MCC 2A ROOM COOLER..

Interacion Effects

7. Are soft targets firee from impact by nearby equipment or structures? T YI40UEn N/AE 81-Are overhead equippment disfibuiion, systems,. ceiling 6ies and lightijg, Y[/\iEj- U0J N/Afl and masonry block walls nor likely to cb]lapi9 onto the equipmeni?
9. Do attached*lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yf9fNC- UE) NIA%
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,:is equipment free YYl'NLE U0]

ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions i1 . Have:you looked for and found-no otbher seismic c9onditions that could YE], UD adoersgIy aff.cttlie safety functions f the equipmeiit?

Coamrtn*ts (Additional pages may be added as necessary) fi" "

Evaluated by: A1 Date:..

,MKII (

Page 73 of 467

T ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION61.0 Page 74 of 467

A is ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 75 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

,,4 ,

Sheet 1of,"11 Status: YN NEI uE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Eqoipimentl ID No, Q2E161-1008 Equip. Classk 10 Equipment Description 121'MCC 2BRoom ACU Location: Bldg. &LAg.._ Floio El, 121' Room, Ariea ......

Manufacturei'r, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructioels for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document thexresults of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions. may be used to record the results uf judgments and, findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for doClrcenting other colfiments, Anehorne 1:. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e:, is the item one Y .NEI of the 50/%of SWEL items.requiring such, verification)?

Anchorage configuration was based on SEWS for 02E16H008-Band QEI 16H.007-A dated 07-03-93 and 07-01-93 respectively.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NO, U- N/AI Welded to embedded steel
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NO UC N/AC oxidation?

Very minpr surface.corrosionand cracked paintobserved. No.

degradationof.weld observed. Conditionhas no adverse seismic impact..

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NC UC N/AC
5. Is the anchorage:configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NC UC N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is'one of tihe 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. 'Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS0 NEI UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the eclaipmesnr ctass name from Appeudix B: Ctasses of Equipment, Page 76 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofx9 Status- YZ NTU UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquiptnentiDNo. Q2E16HOO8 Eq.uip; Class' 10.

Equipiient Descriptioh 121'MCC:2B Rom ACL,.

Interdction Effects

.7. Are soft targets fiee froom inmpactby ne.arhy equipment or structures? YZ NC UC N/ACl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 'N17 UCl N/AC and masonry block walls not likely tocollapse onto theequipment?

Componentis~ad/acentto a block wall. The wall was seishrically qualifiedas part of the response to NR C 1; E. Bulfetin 80 11, as documented in Report No FTG-C-002, Ro, and on drawing 0-206004, R16.

9. Do attached lines.haVe adequateP:flexibility to avoid damage? YN NC UCn N/AC1 10! Based oh the above teismic inter'actiodn evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI CUl of~pdt{enitll) adverse, seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. tLHave.you looked for and found no othee lsci-nic conditions that could YN No U0 adversely affect:the safety functions of the equipmen ..

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)'

Evaluated by: P. Miktus9z4 Date: 08-23-12 SYU(In 03-23-:12:.

Page 77 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 78 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 79 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 10 Status: YI;-f 1\Z] [in Seismic Walkdown. Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21FT0943 Equip. Class t 18 Equipment Description HIGH HEADQ SAFETY INJECTtON.tFLOW -RANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor EL..00 Room, Area _ .U.

Manufacturer,,Model, Etc. (optional but recotmnended)

Instructions for-Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist~for documenting other comments.

Anchjorage I, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items fequiritng such verification)?

2, Is the anchoragefree of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yd( ND U1 N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YdNE3 UrD N/AD oxidation?

(JIM~ 1~

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks.in the concrete near the anchors? Yd ND UD N/A-0
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent.with plant domumentation? YDI ND UD1TNA (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

tJL 0M6 ARý Qe'o 5 rNae A'j ,4rgyijoQA&E veopleAri r5 P.or

&. Based on thie above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YtdNDC UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment cla.s namie froin Appendix B- Classes of Equipment, Page 80 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 f Status. N4 UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21FT0943 Equip. Clas' 18 Equipment Description HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by neaby equipmeat or structures? Yg /NJE Uo NIAC1 8, Are overhead equipment., distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lightin, Y N*E* UC N/A0 and iriasoiry b6lck walls not likely to collause onto the equipment?

9 at aoK 1-5 A'h-e 0aqU rE WCeebir eo d - g U 7T,

'E-,NVAW U N LNOPD (E4KE?T0 FtqN-et)V2, ACF DsQ4 D~-206502, 9: Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? 4 NE U5] N/A[3

10. Based on the aboves*eisific interactibn evaluations is equipment free YjNE] U[3 of potential1yadverse seismicinteiaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1.j,. Ha;,ve you looked for ar'd found no othlerseismic conditions that could Y4 Nin U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cow ments,(Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date __ _ _

Page 81 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSIOR Page 82 of 467

3 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 83 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet t of Status: Y15 N[* UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21LCVOI15B Equtip; CIass' 8 EquipmentiDescription RWSTTO CHARGING PUMP SUCTION VALVE LAocation: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 RootnmArea 2 Z_- _

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item.of equipment on the SWtIL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjbidgments and findings. Additional spaceis provided at the end of this checklist fordoculnentibg other conmients.

1. is the anchorage configuration verification requith (i.e., isthe i'em one YE NEI3, of the 50% of.SWEL items requiring such verification)?

ln*iine' cokr-y*.,rml- ho. ai-lckof-&ý4,*

2. Is-the anchorage free of beatbroken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UEJ NIAp
3. Is the anchrnige&free of corrosion that. is morethan mild surface YE NEJ UO N/Aal oxidation?

,4. is the anchorage free of visible cracks in,the concrete near the anchors? YE NO Un N/Ap

5. Isthe anichorage configuration consistent with plat,.d6cuientatiod? YE NE UE N/A[A (Note: This question only applies ifthe iterm is one of the 50% for which an anchorage cotnfigiration venfication is requited.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI160E lE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment, clas's siaine from Appendix. R- Clastnt of Equipmnent.

Page 84 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 status: Y* NW u*Z Checklist (SWC)

Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID N6. _2E21LCVOI16B , Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RWST TO CHARGING PUMP SUCTON VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YI[ NEI Ut] N/AL]

rT - _4=" . "it'h*I6cfr LIU ii-F 4 s j=*,,eeeeIv,, "Px~e

8. Are overhead equipment, disltributionsystems. ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI t UO NIAL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipenfut?
9. Do attache dines hiavc adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

t Nt Ut] N/Al

10. Based on the above seismic interactionrevaluations, is equipnment free Yb6 NL] Ut]

ofpotentially ader-se seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked -for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI Ut3 adversely affe6t the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

IEvaluated by: '4~. Date: &/11L l

\JuV ~ /

t_.016 MIU Page 85 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 86 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 il/vj Page 87 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YVN-' Ul Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. Q2E21LT112 Equip. Class*,i a8 Equipment Description VCT LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121: Room, Area 22 IQ Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but iýeeommended) ....

Instructions for Completing Checklist This chbeklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the .followingquestions maybe used'to record the results ofJudgnents and findings. Additiohal space is proi'ided at the end of tfiisecheckist for documentffigother comnents.

Anorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e:, is the item one YO b of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verfi catiort)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent ,broken, missing or loose hardware? IXVKD1 U0 N/AD
3. Ithe anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YbIN2urn N/ADI oxidation?
4. is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? yoND UD] N/AD 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent witb plant documentation? YD NOl UD] N/A/

(Note:This question only applies if the itiem is onel of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on theabove anchorage evaluations, is ie anchorage .free of y¥ ý.D. UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class nmune fiom Appendix B: Ciasses of Equipment.

Page 88 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: Shtt Y*N T. of 3 UDq Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmeint ID No. Q_2E2it-T1.12 EquipL T Cas 18 Equiprencn Desri~ption VCT LEfVEL TRANSMiTTER... "

.nteraction Effects

7. Are soft targets free~from impact by niea -by equipment or structures? yz 4 1EJ uo NIAD
8. Are overhead equipment,,disttibution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y&ND UD1 N/AD and mnasdnry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Doattaclied isnes 1taveadequate flexibilityto avoid.d4nsage?: Y4"ND1 UE N/A[D,
0. Bsd the aipovelsniic interaction evaluatioiis, is equipmernt free YI- N!D3. U0D of potentially aderse seismic interaction effeets?

Other Adverse Conditions

.11. Have you looked for and found no. other seisni.c conditions that. could I1El] UD adverseI, affect the safety fuinctions Of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 11 Evaluated by:, Date: _________

wL '

Page 89 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 90 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I ofaiq Status: I"jNO UD]

Seimic Walkdowrt Checklist (SWC) ~E~IV Equipment ID)No, Q2E.!MOV8100 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment DescriPtion RCP SEAL WATER RETURN ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area __._ _ _ _ _

Manufacturer, Miodel,. Etc. (optional but recommended) instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of:judgments and findings. Additionalspace is provided at the end of Ihischecklist lbr documenting other comments..

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YNo of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage, free of bentý broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NEI UD NI/AP 31 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UDf N/A[2/

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NETU[ N/AU/
5. Is the anrchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE_ NO~ UE N/A (Note: This questiotonly applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the aboe anchorage cvalUatilopsis the.anchborage free of YI*NO TUE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

4-GQq 2Cr Entfer the equprment cwass namt-ne*n Appendtix B: Cla.se, f Equipment.

Page 91 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet .2 0f;k Status: Y&'NE LiiiE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment f) No, Q2E21MOVSIO0 Equip. Classi 8 . ..... . _ . .

Equipment Description RCP SEAL WA TER RETURN ISOLA TiON Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? 4 YlW 4[] UE] N/AL]

8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems. ceiling ,iles and lghtitng, YW//N] LCi N'/AFI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse ontothe equipment?

9. Do attached linesdhave adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO/"NE3 U0, N/AL]
10. Based on the above seismic :interaction evaluations, is equipment free LONi'D of potentially adverse'sdismic interaction.effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11l. 1-ave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions thatcould Yf NO UL]

adversely affect the safe-ty functions o the equipment?

Com menits (Aditinonal pages may be added as necessary) rhs&v~VS

~ osu~ (~c  :(Do'S Eyaluated by: VI}QON.gc

ý Date: .....

.I

('ý-/ /ý.3 'ýý)

Page 92 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 93 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 94 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Shleeý' i o X~lt (~O~0Xins

t. c~sc~ x.~Žs~c~.Status: Shee Nsofg Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) -V& E&

Equipmen't ID No. Q2E21? 0V80ý8 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description C7A.R ING PU P TO RCS ISOLATiON __

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor E1 121 Room, Area Manufacthir'r, Model. Etc, (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be usedto document the results of the.Seismic Walkdown of an item of equiphient on the SVWEL,.The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and firidings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Ancorag

1. Isthe anchorage configration Verification required(i.e., is the item one YE NN' of the 50% of.SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[3 NE] UE] N/A[3"
3. Isthe anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEJ 'Ul NiAk" oXidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE] N/Ag"
5. Is the anchorage [otfigurationconsistent with plant documentation? YE] NE U[] NiWA*

(Note: This questi only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchiorage configuiration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage flee of Y*/.Np V.UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the: coui ments name from Appendjtx 15C'btsses of Equinrnentn Page 95 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 a-Y NofM. E s:t Status:Y-]:N .U ]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equip**ent lD No. Q0E21MOVMI08 Equi Chlass' 8 Equipment Desl)ý d io CHARG!NG PUMP TO RCS ISOL4A,1N .

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YgfNI] U.1 N/AC.
8. Ate overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles andtighling, and masom'y block Walls not likely to collapse ofto the equipnient?

9, Do attached linesihave adequate flexibility to avoid danMsge? Y¥[N] U0 N/AO 1O0 Basedon le abO seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y ,NtIUI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions j 1...ave you looked for andfound no-other seismic conditions that could Yd qNC. UVi adversely affect the sfety functions of the nquipment?

Comments (Additienal pages moy be.added as necmssary)

Evaluated byv_______D____ate:_______

(J C/t5I Page 96 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION O1.0 Page 97 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of /A Status: YfA NO uM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8109C Equip, Class, 8 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPPOO2C MINIFLOW VALVE _

Loc*tion: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor 102 Roo, Area Mafiufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but reconmmended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an ein :of equipment onthe SWqEL. The space below each.ofthefollowing questions may be used-torecord the .resultsofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the endof this checklist fordocumenting bther comments.

Anchiorage.

1, hs the anchorage configuration verification required (ice., is the item one YE] NI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inii~

co~r ~ ho ctx)(ho.ýCje'

2. Is theanchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE UE] N/Aý4 3, Is the.anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI Ut1 NWA oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visiblecracks in the concretenear tle anchors? YE] NE UO] .N/lA
5. Is the anchorage configuration ,onsistent with plant documentation? YE] NE]0 U1 N/A4 (Note: This question:only applies if the itemn is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6, Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yo NE] UO potentiallyadverse scismic conditions?

IEnter thieequipment classr ame from Appendix 3: Classes of Equipment.

Page 98 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 I

Sheet 2 Of 4 Status: Yf:ý NO U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E2IMOV810.9C2 Equip. Class, 8:

Equipnient-Description CHARGING PUMP P002C MINIFLOW VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are sofl targets free from impact.by nearby equipment or structures? Yf NEI 11] NiA[l 8- Are overhead eqtiipffient, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI] U0 N/AC" and masory block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines.have adequate flexibility to avoid darnage? YPNO UEJ N/A[l
10. Based on the ab es ei,-4ic interactionevaluations.,is equipment free Yo NOj U0C ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have.you looked foramid found no other seismic conditions.that could YU NO UE adversely affbect the.safbty functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) cx.,I,,.,~A t~

byv U.t,  :.

1/2~htAArnfYYl is U O(2LA WUXZ~~ NA (7t1?2LI%\/ Date:

-C 1~.

Page 99 of 467

T ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION fl 77T, Ql Page 100 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 101 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet j0fa Status: Y12f NOl UDE 11011" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID'No. Q2E21AMOV8130A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description :CHG PUMPSUCTIONHDRISOLATION . . . .

Location, Bldg,. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 RoomArea,___

Manufactuer, Model, Etc. (optional bhit recommenided) __ .... _ _--_ _

Inst ructions for Completing Checklist:

This checklist may be used to document.the results of the Seismic WValkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may ba used to repcord the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space Is provided at the end of this checklisi for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification reqtired (i.e.,is the item one YEI Nd of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.I s the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YD NO'UL3C N/A[9/

3. Is the anchorage free.of conosion that is more than mild surface YO ND1 UO N"Ad oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the'anchors? YD ND] UE] N,/Atn
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD NEI UD NhAid (Note: This questiononly applies if the item is one of thc.50% for which an anchoragc configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEJ'NM UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipmencltass name from Appendix B:,C1asSea of Equipment, Page 102 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 She.et 2 Ofof Status:., YV1 NE] -V .ý Seismic Walkdown' Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No..Q2E21MOVS730A Equip. Class , __.. _ _

Equipment Description. CHG PUMP SUCTION HDR ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are solt targeis ftee f!-om impact by nearby equipment or struefures? Y2(N0 UO N/AF-
8. Are overhead equipmenijdistribution systems, ceiling riles and lighthig; Y[9'..ND UED N/AD3 and masonry bloc*k walls not likely to collapse ontd tihe eq1ipment?

BLoa .. 04 rHE W. 14 .1 &P me4 AWit 9ý Do'altached lines have ade~quate flexibility to avoid damage? Yld INE:1 VD N/AE1

10. Based on the"above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipaierit free 4NDEIT of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions.

I:1 Have you looked, for and found no other seismic conditions thai could. YJ NEI UED adversely affect the safety funetidos of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as neCestsary)

Date:,

Page 103 of 467

SATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 104 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3:3 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 105 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

status: StYeettu J' 4u

ýNin UF1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID.No. Q2E2IMOV8133A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment: Description CHG PUMP DISCHARGE HDR 13OM TION

.Location: Bldg-. AUXILIARY Floor El. 1!2 _. . Room, Area Z11.E

.Manufacturei, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended).

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist'may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk down of an item of equipment on. the SWEL. The:space b.elow each of the following qiuestions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for, documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Nd of the 5,0 % of'SWELitems zequirrig..suci Vcrification)?
2. Is:the anchorage free of bentj broken, missing or loose hardwyare? YE] NE ] N/-A 3, Is the anchoragefreeofcorrosion that is more than:mfildlsurface YE] NEI liE] N/A2!

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete. near the anchors? YE] NE] UE]N
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with'plant documentation? YE] NE] unE N/AER/

(Note*, This question iinly applies if the item is one of the.50% for which ai anchorage configuration verification is required2)

6. Based on the aboye anchorange evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y4~ NE] UýE o6tential!, adt'ers.e..seismic 'codditions?

'Enter the equipmentt class nametifioni Appeildix B: Ciasese ofEquipinent.

Page 106 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet a-afi,.JD~

Status: YE NEI UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment iD No. Q2E21MOV8133A Equip, Cdiss* 8 Equipent .Description CHG PUMP DISCHARGE HDR iSOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearty equipment or structures? Yg"NC UC N/AM

& Are overhead equipment; dis,4ibuio:nn systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE-"No U[2 N!AO and masonry block walls not'likey tib colapse onto the equipment?

15 LJCK. WUAL QVAL1UjA.TeI.D1TaC o

.9 -Do attached lines have ade~quate flexibility to'av'oldazmageý? YL~mNC UQ N/AC]

10. Basedon the above:seimic interaction evahsations, is eqpipnI entffee YQNU, t/

of potentially adverse seismnic interamtidn 'ffects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11:. Have you looked for and~found no other seismnic conditions that could YT*NC U-adversely affect the.shafety. functions of the equipmeit?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as nemssary)

Palm Da~te:

6.YVAL)

Page 107 of 467

p ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 9 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 108 of 467

0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 109 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of[ 1[]

Status. YP NDJ Un Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmcnt lD No. Q2E21M0V8885 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description HHSI TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLA VTON Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2.t-A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on'the SWEL. The space bellow each of the following queitions may be used to record the results'ofjudgments and findings. Additional spaceis provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraoe I Is the anchorage configuration verification required (iLe., is the item one. YE Nb of the,50% of SWELL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE UE1 N/AM
3. Is the:anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEVNE' UE N/Ajd oxidation?
4. Is the antchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE N/Ad S. is the ainchorage configuration consistent with plant~documentertfion? YE NO UE N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is requii-ed.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is theanchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y No Uglat,

'Enter the equipnment olss name from Appeuidix B: Clases of EquipM61L Page 110 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 Of3 Status: Yo Nn LUi Seismic'Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q V8885 Pnu~n (1,~s1 R Equipment Destfiption.HLHS/ TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YID;NE UM N/AE

>t e--rdtel t

'15 GVý~2ez~w E qfv- is,

~ f~5.~**~~ f 1

j .: 1*C klt>V tC, Cý l~b0 atO(:V51'U jý MT 81 Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YXZNO V-LJN/A[J and masonry block walls not likely to collapse-onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YP NEI liE N-/AO
10. Based on the above: seismic interaction evaluatiorns, is equipment free Y4NEI Li of potentially adverse seismic isiteraction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

.11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YICNR UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipmnent?

Comnmentsf_(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:_

.Date-.

Page 111 of 467

A 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 112 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 113 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of ;r Status: YS'NEI Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02E21P02B . Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description CHARGING/HHSI PUMPP002B SWING PUMP Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area I2- 1.

Manufacturer, Model,.Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown ofan item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorsi~

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y06 NO of the 50%/ of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI' NO U" N/AQ
3. Is the anchorage free ofcorrosion that is more than mild surface Yf/NO U0 N/AQ' oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage frie of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ 1 NO UED N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YR/N' U" N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

vlýý W P 4 v Q 1EZ( 9,9 07A

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YdA NOI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 114 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4ý Status; Yg NE] uf Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo QL2E21P02B Equip. Class55 Equipment Description CHARGtNG.,'HHSt PUMPP002B.SqNG PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? yul'Ftý vD N/ADl 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YG/NO Uo N/AO and masotuy block walls not likely to collapse onto the equilpment?
9. Do attached lines haie adequate:fexibility to avoid damage? YUNO: UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmen free Y7 NDUD of potentially adverse sismic inieration effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and foud no other seis=mi conditions that could Y[ffND UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

C600~i '00)T 6eI- f1,itrrATý l V A) q 16F"P , 4 Evaluated by: :1 1 .I . IW ' 'Date:

Page 115 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 116 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

(,J Page 117 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

,Aq Page 118 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: YV Nn CuF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IONo. 02F16LT0501 Equip. Class, 18 Equ.pmn

.. Descriptin RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location. Bldg.: YAR6 r, "L ....

oanBg orlEl. 155 Room, Area RWST Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (option:l but recomieended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used todocumeni the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWl.,, The space: below eadh of ihe following questi fnmtiisbe,: ised to vecOrd the resulss of judgments and findings: Additional space is provided.atthe end of this checklist for ddcittntnfningother comnmients.

Anchorae.

1, Is the anchorage confgurzison verification reuired (i~e,usthe item one YD N,'

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring stwh verification ?. .

2.. Isthe anchorage free of bent, broken, missing oriloose.hard are? Y8 NC*- .U N/AD]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface N U0 N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage ftce of visible cracks in the concretenear the anchors? Y[*-NIE :U[C N/AD1

( 5 Is the anchoragecýofigriuri wdnsistert with plant ddoumen tation?

(Note: This qsteSriOn otihyapplies it.se item-iis one of rihe: 5017for whi ch an anchorage configuraionverification is required.)

YD NDJ U5D N/A,"j "

6. B3ased on the above anchorage e'ialuations, isthe anchorage:firee of YkNPD 1C0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

[Eater trh equiphreanr eties namie fruns Appendis 03:Cla~sses of Eqeipor'ns.

Page 119 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet z ofw Status: N N1 U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SW.C)

Equippment ID No, Q2FI6LT0501 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER..

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? hX10Ut0 NIAQ) 8, Are overhead, equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles:and lighting, NO*UEJ N/AEJ and masonry block walls not likelylto collapse onto the equtipoient?

9, Doattached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? 5JNO UEJ N/AE 4~~~~~~~. ~r -L oO~~~ ma /~ s~i~-~c&

"10 ¢I " Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YkTNr UE3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction eifects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Hlave you looked for and foun"d.; nib iher, sismicconditionsi that could NM UM adversely affect the safetyfunctions of the equipment?

Conntnents (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/jA o,0-Evaluated by: j>tz D a t6.ý&---3-0 1-2-0 Z-,>-

ý'/'o/;-,0/ Z.

Page 120 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 121 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 122 of 467

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13004A254&oldid=2458693"