ML12342A102

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:38, 18 March 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
MPR-3801, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Revision 1, Part 13 of 13
ML12342A102
Person / Time
Site: Limerick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/06/2012
From: Schlaseman C S
Exelon Generation Co, MPR Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RS-12-171 MPR-3801, Rev 1
Download: ML12342A102 (170)
v • d • e


Text

Sheet i of 2 Status: tV) N U Seismic. Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. --Equip. Class1 2 (08) Fans & Air Handlers Equipment Description Control Room Intake Damper Location:

Bldg. C ,I Floor El. 304L Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist, may be used to document the results of the Seismic Waikdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorayme

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO N]Y'4 N[ UE-1 N/Afl YD NEI UF- N/AO Y, NnI UE- N/A[1 YEI NEI UE N/AX YXNEI UL-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn

  • R5-19-171 C-457 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 'T Hi3- -" o-i0W Equip. Class12 (08) Fans & Air Handlers Equipment Description Control Room Intake Damper Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?, Nl s$-0 4ycOrq45 YM NEI U- N/A0l 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN Ni U and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

el l Ju& a rnlaway ov( 40 vell r.uppe~c-A

[I N/ACI&re 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[NEI UEl N/AE YX NEI Ui Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX Ni Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) aIA Q-me 91A Evaluated by: Date: (Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn -RR-19-171 C-458 Equipment ID: HD-78-027A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Cnrrs.nnndpnrp Nn* RS-19-171 C-459 Equipment ID: HD-78-027A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPqnnndPnr NAn* RR-19-171 C-460 Equipment ID: HD-78-027A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrP.innndinrp Nn

  • R5-19-171 C-461 Equipment ID: HD-78-027A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrPqnnndPnrP Nn
  • RR-17-171 C-462 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HD-081-041A Equip. Class12 (08) Fans & Air Handlers Equipment Description Spray Pond Intake Fan Damper Location:

Bldg. Spray Pond Floor El. 268 Room, Area Room 1005 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorafe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEJ N YKNO UD N/A[l UED N/AN UD N/AED YEI NEI UE N/AJ iNI U-1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (hnrePqnnndpsnr'.p No -RR-19-171 C-463 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. HD-081-04 IA Equip. Classl2 (08) Fans & Air Handlers Equipment Description Spray Pond Intake Fan Damper Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not lil ly to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?4ONO Ur- N/AD"N9-N UD N/AD 4yN D UD N/AD),4ND U'Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y¥ ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated Date:< C-4 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrA.nnndPnr.P Nn

  • RS-17-171 C-464 Equipment ID: HD-081-041A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 C-465 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrr.nnndPnr.P Nn *RP-19-171 Shegt I of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

Equip. Classl2 (05) F1 '3 (A~r/I4 Volhw Equipment Description Ar -6 M(-gf ISoIa 4 Ve Vo010 Location:

Bldg.+! r Floor El. Ro Manufacturer, ETtc(optional but recommended) om, Area _Q11 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorarre

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-] NX>of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?.VoI e -.s 1: -6V oe -~Oev~ A vdcur mavn~d 4.o v olt I c~A ~ ~ y uppo?* -,s &ac k-+4ro 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y'F NEI U- N/AF" Y. NE] UE] N/AE-YN NEI UI- N/A[]YE] NEI UE" N/Abd YX NEI U[-]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 CnrrP.annndPnr.P, Nn " Rq-19-171 C-466 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 1W-O 0i~ Equip. Class 1 2 (05) F-uJcl (A~r/l~y VOI^i~Equipment Description

.(k 1 Afe A*, r Ae M T-o-eI,.n Voht(Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?.IVo CAM1600 etu)PKM4 Or bloCA VWoll4 ;V7 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yg NEI UD] N/AU Y)Q NEI UE- N/AU YN NEI U-' N/AU 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?,Clc~ 1 rc, mwi,, 46 ac9-ce~r -it Jv~4yt Surj 0CCeAAI'P

ý,,ice oll a- W1ii PQ6 pef x~NEI UE]{ lei 4c c~r~Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y( NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: q / I /, e /3 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrPqnnndPnrn.p Nn* RM-1'-171 C-467 Equipment ID: HV-078-021B Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP~nnndPnr'P Nn

  • RR-1?-171 C-468 Equipment ID: HV-078-021B Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrp.,nnnrlpnr-Nn
  • RR-19-171 C-469 Equipment ID: HV-078-021B i l Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP~nnndi(nr.o Nn -RR-12-171 C-470 Equipment ID: HV-078-021B Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrfpnnndPnrp.

Nn* R.-17-171 C-471 Equipment ID: HV-078-021B Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 f.nrrp-qnnndpnrj-Nn " RR-19-171 C-472 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-12-032A Equip. Class2 (06) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description Spray Nozzles A Inlet Location:

Bldg. Spray Pond Floor El. 256 Room: Area Room 1010 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YIND U" N/A]YAND UD N/AD A[ND UE- N/AD YO ND UD N/A-, Y4"ML1 UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1" RR-19-171 C-473 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. HV-12-032A Equip. Class1 2 (06) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description Spray Nozzles A Inlet Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nea by equipment or structures?

590 U'- N/AEJ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y 4-N[E UOI N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y'N UUI N/ACJUD NA'IN u Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could V!qD UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: ( C-4 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 ,nrrpQnnnrlpnr.p Nn R5R-19-171 C-474 Equipment ID: HV-12-032A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrmrqnnnPdnr.P Nn- RR-19-171 C-475 Sheet I of 2 Status:(M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PSH-12-004A Equip. Classl2 (17) Temperature Sensors/Local Instruments (Not on Racks)Equipment Description RHR Service Water Pump OA506 Loop A Location:

Bldg. vray Pond Floor El. 268 Room, Area Room 1000 (at.g Sid i (4. 4pi is)Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO AI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y2NEI U["] N/A[]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y NEI Ut] N/At]oxidation?rlI(o 4Oa e 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y* -,NEI Ut] N/At]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Yt] NEI Ut] N/IA (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y4A 1t Ut]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >"~merick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rbrrimnnndPnr.P Nn -RR-19-171 C-476 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. PSH-12-004A Equip. Class1 2 (17) Temperature Sensors/Local Instruments (Not on Racks)Equipment Description RHR Service Water Pump OA506 Loop A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? D UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y., [D UDI N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y;4ND UD N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y 4UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could [ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: /I 'c< C-4 >)Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrm-nnnrfnr.p Nn RR-19-171 C-477 Equipment ID: PSH-12-004A I Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 fl.nrrP.-nnnrfI~nr'.P Nn -.R~-19-171 C-478 Equipment ID: PSH-12-004A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrr#-qnnndPnr.P Nn -RR-t2-171 C-479 D Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs)Below are the names and signatures of the personnel who performed the area walk-bys.Thomas King Craig Swanner Mojtaba Oghbaei James Wiggin/y. yh The order of the Area Walk-By Checklists (AWC) for Unit 2 is shown in Table D-1 below and the order of the AWCs for Unit 0 (common) is shown in Table D-2.Note: Photos for the AWCs are included in the base component SWC in Appendix C.Table D-1. Unit 2 Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs)AWC- Base U2-xx Building Elevation Location Component ID 1 Diesel Generator Building 217 Room 315A 2AG501 2 Diesel Generator Building 217 Room 316A TISH-20-221A 3 Diesel Generator Building 217 Room 315A 2AV512 4 Diesel Generator Building 217 Room 315A 2AT564 5 Diesel Generator Building 217 Room 316B 2BT528 6 Diesel Generator Building 217 Room 315D 2DC563 7 Diesel Generator Building 217 Room 315D 2D1T558 8 Diesel Generator Building 217 Room 315D 2DT564 9 Control Structure 217 Room 360 2DD103 10 Control Structure 217 Room 361 2CD101 11 Control Structure 239 Room 426 2BD105 12 Control Structure 239 Room 427 2A2D101 13 Control Structure 239 Room 430 20Y104 14 Control Structure 254 Room 453 2AD160 15 Control Structure 289 Room 540 20C201 16 Control Structure 289 Room 542 20C609 17 Control Structure 332 Room 625 20X283 18 Control Structure 332 Room 625 20Y206 19 Control Structure 269 Room 533 20C647 I_ (MCR)Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 D-1 Table D-1. Unit 2 Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs)AWC- Base U2-xx Building Elevation Location Component ID 20 Control Structure 269 Room 533 20C602 (MCR)21 Reactor Enclosure 217 Room 370E 2BS252 22 Reactor Enclosure 217 Room 370W FT-51-2N001 23 Reactor Enclosure 283 Room 580W 20B213 24 Reactor Enclosure 295 Room 593 HV-52-2F037 25 Reactor Enclosure 217 Room 370E 20C019 26 Reactor Enclosure 253 Room 475 20C026 27 Reactor Enclosure 253 Room 475E LT-42-215B 28 Reactor Enclosure 253 Room 475W LT-42-215A 29 Reactor Enclosure 201 Room 280 HV-51-2F014A 30 Reactor Enclosure 191 Room 173 2AV210 31 Reactor Enclosure 190 Room 185 2CV211 32 Reactor Enclosure 177 Room 185 2CP206 33 Reactor Enclosure 177 Room 174 2BE205 34 Reactor Enclosure 183 Room 174 2HV210 35 Reactor Enclosure 177 Room 180 2BV209 36 Reactor Enclosure 177 Room 181 2FV211 37 Reactor Enclosure 313 Room 638W 20B201 38 Reactor Enclosure 283 Room 580W 20B204 39 Reactor Enclosure 177 Room 189 20C018 40 Reactor Enclosure 201 Room 279 20C021 41 Reactor Enclosure 177 Room 179 HV-49-2F029 42 Reactor Enclosure 238 Room 319 HV-55-2F003 43 Reactor Enclosure 177 Room 173 2AP202 44 Control Structure 239 Room 429 2AD106 45 Reactor Enclosure 201 Room 284 2AC208 46 Reactor Enclosure 201 Room 202 PSL-12-202A 47 Reactor Enclosure 177 Room 376 HV-57-231 48 Diesel Oil Storage Tank 206 Yard 2AP514 Underground Structure 49 Reactor Enclosure 177 Room 188 HV-52-2FO01A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 D-2 P'WC'-LJ2.-

i Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(D N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. F D Ct Floor El. 211-. Room, Area'3..3 <-iA4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?)ONEI UO N/AF 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant X NEI UEJ N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?UI] N/AD/'9 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial "lV NEl U" N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting7

)? OV&--, ' .,q 4 ,-( / -J 6: , "Ur V 4./ [t~-bolif Lb- G~ra "{A 4. J 6j fJt -Pie$ -t4, qe-Cwo/ (f- I e Re'. 3 Pt"1 If the room in which the SNVEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.SC-5 >__:_ ..... =__ o,.,^. ,i.; -,D -3 LineriCK G~eneraing Satio ~LLUI LL MPR-3801, Revision 1 (rnrrP~nnnd1Pnr'iPNn-P.-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. ý-b) 7' Floor El. , '7. Room, Area 1 3 3 J.'-¢A 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic 2E J UL- N/A[]interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? ., 64';Fý6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic W fl UD N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?A cj0eA... ov'Lý' CS V YV a- Wjc j So 0 0no rkf 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y1flI] UD N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4 DNE U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: &A vvJ Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 CrnrrP~qnnndPnr.p Nn

  • RR 171 D-4 A\WC-U7 2_2-Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. G-1 -? Floor El. 2 Room, Area13 Z Iz", 0 II Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items..The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y 0D U" N/AD ,4 I Ly " II 1' V 0 V ULLA .tJI V VIO1LIL Wa JULL'L ILWAI Iy opening cabinets)?

V tol I N'2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y/.[I UED N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YJND UD N/AD]raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y),KN-] UD N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and f ,do I d 13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.4 C-5>Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-5 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrmnnndPnr.np Nn

  • R-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 0J) St Floor El. .2, t Room, Area'3 3 1 A 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YI. N[I UFI N/AE!interaction h could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YJZLNE UDI N/Al] ...t.interactinns that conld --R1 a fi re' in th_ srn9 0 MO A 1 ~ k4~4A~ §~t;~U;~4 ~*614 Atv -e_IVO 4,"".,i q~- "0 "'4wI (P~ 64 Y iý 4 -7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, aged temporary installations Ce.g scaffolding, lead shielding)? l 4: ftr (1 Av -1 VNE-! UIJ N/AED 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU;R adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: 41742 z 2 c.j Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801 ,Revision 1 r.nrrqnnnrPnrP.

Nn ' RR-19-171 D-6 pAwc -LJ 1 `3 Sheet I of 2 Status:O()

N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. .,L4 FloorEL. ..."2J Room, Area'3 A t?_A V I/1. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YO Nil UDl N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y4 NEI U[I N/ADl degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceilin) tiles and lighting)?

A4nf 1'5- L -" Vou a V Gr/& J, 1 NE U13 N/AE!YkNEI UD N/AEI 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >" Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-7 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPnnn(1nr.P Nn

  • R.S-19-171 Awc-U 2-3 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 61)6 Floor El. 2'-0 i Room, Area1 3 j3t!ý (--izA! Level)5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could ause floodipg or spray in the area Y*Nfl UEI N/AO-I , I 7~l, 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a firgip the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

VR e PC- Dwa. A -Z2, sku-t, ,XN[:] uE] N/AEI kev. 6-+.MO)4ýN I UEI N/AOI 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý NQ UQ" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: /Oy Z/C/ :ýý P -< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Cnrrm'nnnd~nrP.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-8 MtC -U?-L Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (V N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 6' P Floor El. c k"1- Room, Area 1 3.3 6 A C'2 AT-54 4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the drea appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

X4ftJ uT N/A[]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y/J.N[EI UE] N/AE]degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismicconditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with 'other equipment in the area (e.q., ceiling tles and NENO UO N/AD)A NEI U[3 N/AE Ile 13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the, order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPqnnndPnr.P.

Nan RR-19-171 D-9 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. &bC-! Floor El. S.. L Room, Area'3  ? S: A (2.1ATqgq i.-'i)5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y(N U[] N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? ,, _,4IA b W'0,.'*Mo I( q / Z!,,;/,I.

.2. -..P " " 4 , .-7 .._ --6. Does it appear that the area is free of pot ially adverse seismic YdNDU" N/ADI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YKNE] U0 N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y~fND UD 4'Additional pages may be added as necessary) cerlu Date: Y If< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrm'nnnrIPnrc.

Nn -RR-19-171 D-I0 AvC~V-0 ýýSheet 1 of 2 Status: (9 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. ...O& .FloorEl. .-tLI Room, Area"-_3 JL&..., Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YfN[] UE] N/Al]potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YMEL.NEI U[J N/AFL degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?N l UD3 N/Al]4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial .I NO interactions with oin the area (e.g., ceilingtiles and lighting)?

5" " " " U0I N/Al 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be basedon judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item."< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-11 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (nrrPqnnndrnrn.

Mn R.-1M- 71 MR~-- U Z -'Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 6QO& Floor El. 2 17 Room, Area13.Y NE UL N/AED 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic int ractions that coul cause flooding or in the area?.(J -vLtCC(d b hd-0t 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?II 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

CA. N/A P L- q.El UED N/AD XND UO N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ,IEND UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) il~ yi~/Evaluated by: Date: Fly _Z, Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 CnrrmnnnrdIPnr.p Nn -RA-19-171 D-12 AV'J C 2.-Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 1061i FloorEl. i 1ff Room, Area 1 3 Le" J) C63 h Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YANEI UEI N/AU 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant ,N[] U[] N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YINE UD- N/AD 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y;NDI interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? ,(/) /z ' " < r~evre. i 1ý&r.UrD N/AD 13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-1 3 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrmrrnnndPnr"P Nn" RR-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 657 ,, Floor El. -.'-7. Room, Area 1 3.? /5Tb ( 2- c 5.6 3 Lewfl)5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic int actions that ;ould ause flooding or spray inthe area? jc ,no'1/2-5/);6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactio 7 that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YOND1 UD N/AD Y301 UD N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?AJUNEIUEJ Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: t/f//--Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPnnndfn.n Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-14 AýNc -7 Sheet 1 of 2 Status-\ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.'ýM

,' "Floor El. ..L.( .. Room, Area" CA?w ýor Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YLDN U[-] N/All 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yf.N[J Ull N/Al]degraded conditions?

" 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YDNE UD N/AO 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial X--N[] UEJ N/AE]interactions with other equip ent r /thelarea (e.g., ceiling tiles and )l-lighting)?

pý 4A/is 't ~ ~ K1 Ib .r q~r61 4 2,00,2,/003 4 1"U. 11" If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrmnnnrdPnt.

I.ln

  • P5-19-171 D-15

'Nwtý._ L -I Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. .9-- Room, Area 1 3 3 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?WJý UO N/AEJ S7-fqeef 1 MO 01/715P,h/ J( ef4ee--I ce'l-e-jr 4 I-e-ct';'ewl.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?AO ,, Yk~NEI UEn N/AEu 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and terporary instaations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

el*7obes I' VOA "Pt j 4 A{,5 (/IT.&.. ._SNE U- N/A[O)q 6 '4r/4 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that Yp-; UJ[-l : l1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  • ~11 , Evaluated by: D ate : ; 7i ....V-7 f12 (V Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1..nrrP.nnndPnr.&

Nn -RR-19-171 D-16 Avvc--U-Z

-9 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@(f)

N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)(ý2f6& LMct Location:

Bldg. E Floor El. O. t 2: Room, Area'3 ,"'i5 19)'Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of N[] U[..N/A[]potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO "NEI UEI N/AEI degraded conditions?

.-.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic. conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

tinhe area (e.5., 2 eilin tiles 1 an 9: ND UEJ N/AED.YAND UD N/AD I'5- .13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the. area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Sc-5 >.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-17 MPR-3801, Revision 1 I rnrrmqnnnd1nr.P Nn " RR-19-i71 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Flo;7. e4oFFlor El.2UhRoom, Area 1 3 315D (zDr-6-ý kze)5. Does it appear that tte'area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a'rg in thmgea?MOO [n# ,I P& 1k44. -ri-I +YfD Ut- N/ADUD N/AEJ 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y 0I-1 U- N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment, in the area?.0i Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1.nrrPqnnndrPnr.P Nn

  • RR-12-171 D-18 Av/c-u2I-q Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(c N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.Floor El. 2 V- Room, Area'3 22'v,3$6/Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comnAnts.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of _. NE" UE N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y4 N[] Uf N/AD degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?I ND UD] N/AO 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y] Ni UD N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and JSw vk W'-6'A6 iW6PS'V41t' No Hl 4 fv (%'ro e /d6h*ý I49 opeit" .S- tcok- "i.3se. tJce5.-1 %,, "IR o1397696'.

'o4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrm.nnndPnr,.

Mn PRA-19-171 D-19 AirVc -Li 2 -C Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.

Floor El. -24 Room, Area 1 3-*I '5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in Phe area?No lc~v 5 YA NEI UO N/AO YP NO Ut N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic NEI Ut N/At]interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

1~vuC 6 (V51- Xeejp "r&kj et,0 (4 bel p~qf5 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NOl Ut adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrmrnnndrInr.

Nn "- RR-19-171 D-20 AWvC-utL-%o Sheet I of 2 Status:0 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. C°" Floor El. -Z Room, Area1 3 3 L.,.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZND ULI N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant X4VJ UD N/AD degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y ND UD N/AD]4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y, i interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? I~ ,3 ,toi Ve/l $t/e "/ b-e- 5 .0D UD N/AD 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrAinnndrPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-21 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. C& V Floor El. l-2 Room, Area 1 3.'t5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions thai could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Y$,ND UD] N/AD# q UEJ N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic NE UI' N/Al]interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and tempor installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

.4a4 CC,-If .Or vt-t, " "o 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N'-NEI UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated Date: 00,Y Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrP~nnnnrInnr'.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-22 AWC -it Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&YON U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. , ° Floor El. 3 Room, Area13.!:& 1ý ---Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y.-'-I UD] N/AJ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appeal to be free of significant Y.<N[] UEI N/Al]degradedponditions?

r e 1 P Z60105 VC d;~~~fO1 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y.NE] U.] N/A[]YAEIN UD N/AD 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?At4[

I Y , i ra, f3 Ifthe room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g.,on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 >r Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-23 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrmnnnrIPnrc Nn

  • R5-19-171 AwC-U2--)I Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. C_-___o_ Floor El. 213"l Room, Area 1 3 1 ZC-A-' : -_1. I M e 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seisrnic ' 'NI]U[" interactions that could c~ase flooding or spray in the area? ..<-' "<A I q( -C, &j 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction shat could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Wa c CAy O. r, b'/ r V'4-UD N/AfN/Af f .*.A 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NI] UI" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessp f 4&)..A ZI Evaluated by: Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn

  • RR,19-171 D-24 kw(ý -U 2ý -1%AWC for 239' Elevation 426 and 427 DC Battery Rooms Issue: Per EPRI 1019199, "Experience-Based Seismic Verification Guidelines for Piping and Tubing: Volume I-Seismic Verification Procedure, and Volume II -Performance of Piping and Tubing in Strong-Motion Earthquakes," Section 3.2.6, Victaulic couplings used in piping systems should be evaluated to determine if they will "partially or fully separate" during a seismic event. During walkdowns in the Limerick Unit 2 DC Battery Rooms 426 and 427, it was Identified that fire protection lines installed per ECR 99-00484 Include Victaulic couplings.

If these couplings leaked during a seismic event, spray might impact the operability of the safety-related Division 1 and Division 2 batteries.

Disposition:

The 3-inch fire protection line routed through Rooms 426 and 427 is directly over the safety related Division 1 and Division 2 batteries.

A conservative estimate of the piping rotation due to seismic loading at the Victaulic coupling will be determined and compared with the manufacturer's maximum permissible rotation to determine if the coupling will leak/spray during a seismic event.The fire protection line penetrates the rooms' reinforced masonry block walls via core bores. The grouted-in core bore penetrations provide lateral support during a seismic event. The line also includes two rod hangers (H07 and H07A) in each room which provide support in the vertical direction.

The Victaulic couplings are just inside of the core bores on each side of the room (less than 1 ft per Dwg.M-049-276).

The piping is considered to be rigid at the grouted core bores. Since the couplings are so close to the rigid wall connections and they act similar to hinged connections, the piping in each room can be considered to be simply supported between the two Victaulic couplings.

The maximum rotation at the Victaulic coupling is estimated below. The worst case loading will be lateral because the vertical direction has additional supports (H07 and H07A). The lateral seismic loading of 1.7g is taken from the support evaluation in ECR 99-00484, and Is increased by 20% to account for two pipe fittings and a small pipe jog. The maximum expected rotation due to seismic loading is estimated to be about 0.50. Per Victaulic Catalog 06.04, a 3-inch Series 77 coupling can accommodate up to 1.00. Therefore, the Victaulic couplings in the fire protection lines above the batteries in Rooms 426 and 427 are acceptable in this application.

Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-25 MPR-3801, Revision 1 f.nrrmnnnr1-nr.P Nn -RR-19-171 Modulus of elasticity of carbon steel Horizontal seismic acceleration per ECR 99-00486 Support Calculation (includes a 20% conservatism to 1.7 value to account for two pipe elbow fittings and jog for flexibility)

E := 29.106.psi a 1.2.(1.7)a= 204 o := a-(Z58 + 3.2).-b--ft w = 21.99 -I OD 3..in ID = 3.086 in L:= 17.fl+ 8Bin 64 I= 3.0172f4 Weight per unit foot including water Crane 410 Crane 410 Crane 410 Room. width per Divg. M-049-276.2-L 24-E-1 9 -0.476deg Beam rotation at support for a simple-simple beam uniformly loaded in the lateral direction (see Roark)Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rtrrPqnnndnnrA.

Nn -RR-17-171 D-26 PW (_ -U'L -I I Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. -Floor El. 2 Room, Area' 3 4 C-1 J i Vr_Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

UDfE TC N/A[]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YA.NE] U-1 N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y9 [ND UD N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YANO UD] N/A[interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g ceiling tiles and lighting)?

n~V~ qt-(t /4 1, ~ ~ 4(13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWVEL item.< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2*MPR-3801, Revision 1'.nrrPqnnndPn(,F Nn "1<-19-171 D-27 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. GA, I Floor El. 2XL. .Room, Area" 3 '42" 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y1 NO UI N/AD]interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? 3 " 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction*.

at coud cause a fire in the area?UDE N/AD]7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

.1414e-i -04i,- &P M rp kt, "( e.Af(O" AO'f,-IE U- N/AD3.'-7 A 8. Have you looked for and found no. other seismic conditions that could Yt DE U-1:-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: %,A A ýgDgto" Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPnnndPnrc.

Nn ' RR-19-171 D-28 AvWC-~U7 -.L AWC for 239' Elevation 426 and 427 DC Battery Rooms Issue: Per EPRI 1019199, "Experience-Based Seismic Verification Guidelines for Piping and Tubing: Volume I-Seismic Verification Procedure, and Volume II -Performance of Piping and Tubing in Strong-Motion Earthquakes," Section 3.2.6, Victaulic couplings used In piping systems should be evaluated to determine if they will "partially or fully separate" during a seismic event. During walkdowns in the Umerick Unit 2 DC Battery Rooms 426 and 427, It was identified that fire protection lines Installed per ECR 99-00484 Include Victaulic couplings.

If these couplings leaked during a seismic event, spray might impact the operability of the safety-related Division 1 and Division 2 batteries.

Disposition:

The 3-inch fire protection line routed through Rooms 426 and 427 is directly over the safety related Division 1 and Division 2 batteries.

A conservative estimate of the piping rotation due to seismic loading at the Victaulic coupling will be determined and compared with the manufacturer's maximum permissible rotation to determine if the coupling will leak/spray during a seismic event.The fire protection line penetrates the rooms' reinforced masonry block walls via core bores. The grouted-in core bore penetrations provide lateral support during a seismic event. The line also includes two rod hangers (H07 and H07A) in each room which provide support in the vertical direction.

The Victaulic couplings are just inside of the core bores on each side of the room (less than 1 ft per Dwg.M-049-276).

The piping is considered to be rigid at the grouted core bores. Since the couplings are so close to the rigid wall connections and they act similar to hinged connections, the piping in each room can be considered to be simply supported between the two Victaulic couplings.

The maximum rotation at the Victaulic coupling is estimated below. The worst case loading will be lateral because the vertical direction has additional supports (H07 and H07A). The lateral seismic loading of 1.7g is taken from the support evaluation in ECR 99-00484, and is increased by 20% to account for two pipe fittings and a small pipe Jog. The maximum expected rotation due to seismic loading is estimated to be about 0.5°. Per Victaulic Catalog 06.04, a 3-inch Series 77 coupling can accommodate up to 1.00. Therefore, the Victaulic couplings In the fire protection lines above the batteries in Rooms 426 and 427 are acceptable in this application.

Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-29 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrp.nnndPnrp.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 a := 1.2(1.7)a, 2.04.', odulus of elasticity of curbon steel Horizontal seismic acceleration per ECR 99-00486 Support Calculation (includes a 20% conservatism to 1.7 value to account for two pipe elbow fittings and jog for flexibility) ft bft OD = 3"4nr I 3.Md.In L17.ft + B-in 64 1= -. 0.172 f.4 Weight per unit foot including water Crane 410 Crane 410 Crane 4 10 Room width per Dwg. M-049-276 24-E-1 9 -a4weg.Beam rotation at support for a simple-simple beam uniformly loaded in the lateral direction (see Roark)D-30 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 f.nrrP.nnndPnCnp Nn P"R-19-171 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:( QN U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. ('6 -tw_ Floor El. ,239 Room, Area 1" 1430 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments..9J 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y4NEI UE- N/A[!2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y.N5I U-I N/A[]degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?SNEI UL] N/A[]4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y NEI UI] N/Al]interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

.-., 4".O o " ( Z4 h .L\~)'v, IsJ~ I-Pe4t~~1e' S~ artfe by tcc yvt4ýs .~e 4/e 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-31 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrmnnnrPnrP KIn

  • RA-19-171 A4C -U2z-1.3 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. C.S~ l Floor El. .23 9 Room, Area 1 3 j0.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause fl, oing or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactons that could ea te a tjid inhe ae?u1d ea e 1 he area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary.

installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Cc.& , -tcY- , JO Cc.4A c 4 YXi-VI UD N/A["]YjNE1 Ufl N/Afl YgPN-] UD N/AlD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YUlNEr uI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: Z Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 f.nrrP-nnndiPnriP Nn

  • R.-19-171 D-32 AWC-U 2-1~4 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&(9 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. I Floor El. ,2.- q Room, Area 1 3.4,A (. fu(e-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YXNEJ UE1 N/AD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of sigrificant Y4 ND UD N/AD degraded conditions?

A41tvir c '0 i CCf%6C 0 0*3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y;ND UD N/AD 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other .equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

I I' ( g t k A d Vft Yr ND UD N/AD"If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >" Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-33 MPR-3801, Revision 1 f.nrrs~nnndPnr.-

Nn

  • R.-19-171

&WC -U 7-N She 21f4 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. _ Floor El. ZL.. Room, Area1 3 t/5"3 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse'seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?I"ml b., .Y.@(INE] Ur- N/AD'5 IeeL4' '9-YCN- UE- N/AD YNO UO N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismi'c conditions t hat could jY , N EI UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:..----o `7 .Date:.D 4t&4 /q'Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r(nrrP.nnndPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-34 Av4c-L)?--

(5-Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. u.;tl -.

El. 2_,9Y Room, Area13 r'qo Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YKNE UD N/A[-2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant

% NEI UD N/AQ degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?NO UD N/AD 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

0Fvj~A4AJ J~qj,( A (1 0, V'Vf 61,1 a-'Y erolbe SD 1 e Y NQ UD N/AD , 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.A C-5 )Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn" RR-19-171 D-35 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg._A ..4,Floor El. 2 Room, Area'3 ,- 3 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y<N[I UQ N/AC interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y9 NEI UQ N/AC interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y NO UQ N/AC interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

r '-h. f ' 0c- e1.V. '4't j, J ('CesI/y 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YoNO Ul adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? rI Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: 4~i~< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn 'RR-19-171 D-36 AvNX -UZ -1 Sheet I of 2 Status:d, N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. e._Lf ,nlf, loor El. 2. 81 Room, Area'3 5/ ?--Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YEJ U- N/Al]potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y4 NE U[] N/AL]degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

L ~j ý1 ilccý4, Jjg 1" vLIlhe'4b4ý Y,4ND U1 N/ADL YK NO UD N/AL]13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-37 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrPqnnnHPnr.P.

Nn

  • R.-19-171 AMWC-UZ- I Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. , Floor El. ;2 gI Room, Area" 3 2-5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spra in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YAND UO N/AQ N~~D ulN/AUI 2-NEI UE N/AU 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could UJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by/'t dSt~Kc Date: FNI/ _-)Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrri,.nnndrnr.P Kn

  • RR-1 9-171 D-38 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:9 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. -4"3 2 Room, Area'3 1 " Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other commons.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Yf!ýNED UEJ N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant )e N[- UI- N/Al]degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

NEI UO N/Al]YJ6 NEI Ul] N/A[]1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >" Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-39 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrP.nnnHPdnr.pN ln' RR-12-171 AWC UZ-OI -t Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)(ý_OY 93)Location:

Bldg. C z.,',, Floor El. -3" 3- Room, Area 1 3 '5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y4-NlI- UI--1 N/AEI interactions that could cause f!podjng or spra in the ea?'LVi'#-($ ( 9 j ovi I-_)6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire' the area?i~o itu~r Y260 UO N/AEJ 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic [] UI N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., lead shielding)?

Yq. .dey 1 C /V di 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditaions that could YryN) U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: __ _-" Date: /Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrr-pnnnrlPnr.p Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-40 AWC -uz,-(%Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. 33,9- Room, Area1 3 2.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments./0 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YgNQ UD N/AO 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y ND UE] N/AD degraded conditions?

'3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y N UEJ N/ADI raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y NEI UI[] N/Al"]interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

1 3 If the room in which the SWELitem is located is very large (e.g., Trbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-41 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (lnrrPnnndPnr.P.

Nn

  • RR-19-171.

Avjc-Uz- I I Sheet 2of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 6' I Floor El. Room Area 1 3 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI U[J N/Al]interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?('G &'f;--)s Ltl J-,_.cwd 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?YVINEI UH] N/AE!7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YPKNE1 UI N/AD]8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?YM NEIU[]Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.Date: 6 Z L z Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrP.nnndPnr.

Nn

  • P5-19-171 D-42 Pvq C -U-L -Ick Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. FloorEl. , ... Room, Area'3 1 / E.t1-iKiv

/fq Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Yb1"O UE1 N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant

[I" I UD- N/ADl degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?NED UCI N/A[l 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial X UI- N/A[rI interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

C ,J le, -" A 4j 4 5 Cv,..4b. ,,AL 4;,.,, 1 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-43 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPqnnndrnrA.

Mn ' RR-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. " I Floor El. 2(.IL Room, Area" 3 4a.4".:h ,rn,. Lea -I 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Q U- N/AC interactions that could cause /oodyg or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y NEI Ur N/AC interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y 1-NQI UC N/AC interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YCLNO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages way be added as necessary) rs Evaluated by: Date: 44 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision I Nn *S-I P 2-171 D-44 A4 L -Ut- 4, Sheet I of 2 Status:O N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. __-______

Floor El. 26 Room, Area 1 3 !5-3j cf ti4 ei! Z Z7.--A St Ar C ' MCP,)Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YANEI U-] N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y NI U N/A degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit J N-] UQ N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YKNI" UP N/AU interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

C,) ' '.,,.-j , h-e't ,"6 $rk * '5f J1ie)/ by 4 14/e_d~~hs 4 tr ;6 f 14l4d wO A V 1~& U~I"r'44% Sxr ,,"ey,,,,.

Al b.*l.'a If the room in which the SVVEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area shuld be based on~udgment, e.g., on the ordgr of about 35 fet fro the SWEL item. t ' .il ..¢,"', K~f Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 0-45 MPR-3801, Revision 1 fn -Ai-a U171

(..tJ L)- 2-0~ Sh'eet 2of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. Room, Area" 1 33 5 ('A C_)5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yg N[- U-I N/A[3 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic X N'- UE- N/AO interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No )4UO/A 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic )q Ni3 UCI N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YfN4[ U[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date:< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPnnnnr1.nr.

Nn

  • R5R-1 -171 D-46 AWC -U7_ _7_(Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 6)N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. RfleW -Floor El. 2A.. Room, Area'3 rr Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YX ND UI N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YX ND U" N/AO degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?eveCa ..obkc 4 n"15 ýJ? 0()v7-01 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
  • YWN[D] UD N/AD YjX NE UD N/AD neat"$545 11 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< c-5 >.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-47 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrP.nnndrinriP Nn -RS-19-171 AWC S 2t Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Rthetl,, Floor El. _.VX7 Room, Area 1 3 O 9 '. 4JjA';M 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

d__Y NEI UO N/AEJ Y' NEI UE N/AO YM NEI UO N/AEI 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y16 NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MA/Evaluated b, Date: __ _ _ _ _1%4;0 10-L Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP~nnn~nr.P.

Nn ' RR-19-171 D-48 AvJc,- L)2_- 2.-7 Sheet I of 2 Status:(Y)

N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. kf " ..R Floor El. Room, AreaP E" FlorEl 1.'40W Instructions for Completing Checklist This, checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Ad ND UI- N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YX NiD U![- N/AO degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

..Yr NEI UEJ N/A[-]ly YX NO UD N/AD I % ' t cacl not4~ rv le c.4 c f 3 If theroom in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine HAl), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.> -)Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (..nrrpqnnndiPnr.Pi Nn ' RR-19-171 D-49 WJC -U E Sheet 2of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 64_,, .Floor El. -Room, Area13 3>W)iW 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic NE UD N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?PPI 05 pa- 06 Y' Va ve a;l M-5uro?ý.4v rA~f nAvr or r~ r 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YD NE UD N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y]f NEI U[J N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

ý a X 4 W/ Wk l-1 0CW 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NE Ull adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by: GOMM-Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrmnnndpnr.P.

Kin

  • RA-19-171 D-50 Av'4c -L22 -Sheet I of 2N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.. Floor El. -:00"S Room, Area 1 3 .5OW (riior) 'Q Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YD'N[J UI] N/Al]potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

... aq 1 0 1 k Ov.c jc. l o>.O/ty well d,1.a,(J 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YX NE] ULI N/AL]degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?.Fluomr.e*T 4 4c-w5 k 4 YXNEJ UO N/AE Yg N[ UD N/AE]" If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g, Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< c-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-51 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn RR-19-171 Av\vC -U 0 -- -Sheet 2of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. ReaVS Floor El. 3.S3 Room, Area1 3 '-Oj,3)F,1cLIeo t¢, J. .! .5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8.Haeyo looked for andfounc c s aIto YM NE UD N/A[J Y4K NE UO N/AE NE UD N/AEl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YD(NE] UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.o,7 n V~~4 Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrP~nnndrnr.P Nn

  • I.R-1 9-171 D-52

.Iv C-0-?,-1.Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&( N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. -3ý9L Room, Arean SI3 F,-~AMMV¢Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgme.nts and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to-be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YX NEI U- N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y( ND3 UDI N/Al]degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?(oWe 4-ray5, j lkooe 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

NEI UDi N/ADI Y NEI UI] N/AD 13 If the room ini which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based'onjudgmernt,e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.4 C-5 >'Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-53 MPR-3801, Revision 1 ('nrrn'nnnrIPnrt-j N , R5R-19-171 ALA Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. ReaC101" Floor El. X9 .Room, Area' 5ea 3-.0 In. fI .M 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?m YA ND UO N/A[D YhyNEI Ufl N/AEI 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO( NO U[J N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

ote, 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/IA Evaluate dby: y :m Date: 4,/_0L r I*z CL Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPnnnrPnr.

Nn N R.R-19-171 D-54 pmc -1)2- 2-2;Sheet 1 of 2 Status: () N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 0 a, Floor El. 217 Room, Area 1 3*340V E "o,71 I2ot Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN ND UD N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y)X ND U[] N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YX NI] UI] N/AO raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?,Ov"' r 4ro ZA4IC 4 nýu o~oqyc4k1 hole bi i'h 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YW'ND U"] N/AD1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

eer L- Co~l"-Ar AK.'.?Y-1, xv 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWVEL item.< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 0-55 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (lnrr.-nnnr1Pnre.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. b Floor El. "LR- Room, Area 1 3 3M Z'", .5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YK ND UEI N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

., YM ND UD N/ADND UD N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yf ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated b'Y: Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-56 PAYqc -UZ Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (Y) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. PeOA!6 Floor El. Room, Area13 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record: the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[') NX U' N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets? " , .oo- " k8 t M-I .2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YA NO degraded conditions?

UD N/AD 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YX NID UD N/AD Yt ND ULI N/AD 13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< c-5 >" Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-57 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (Thnrrmnnndrnr.

NIn

  • R.R-19-171 AvVC -/-z Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. R&*A,, Floor El. _7525 Room, Area 1 3__ _ _ _ _ _ _5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YJX NEI U[ N/A]interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area2 .,,' ,-.oT~tvIir~ 4 OA' jkv "y' 7ic t srr.,-v " 4Vn "~ srY/food 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?YXND UD N/Al]7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YU. N/IA interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead A,-t'"

shielding)?

", ' " -'cxJ 4 3"'V5Ck W'4h NE -Lr' ,( ev.?~ y, ' e@ 4 Fvc 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y' NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) oLerIJ skvkJ.n mw, pe TfR *#oI&.,Sý43 Evaluated hv" I-J Date: 46on< C-6 )Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrpqnnndPnrP Nn

  • R_-19-171 D-58 f\V4C -U 7- 37 Sheet I of 2 Status:( N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. fle '4*6 Floor El. X,6_ Room, Area" 3 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?NIl UQ' N/A[2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Ybir NI] UQ" N/Afl degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic-conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in th area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

AIM YbKNE UEJ N/AEI YO NEI utn N/Al!13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 )Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPqnronrnP.

Nn RR-19-171 D-59 AWC -U-- L2-Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 947tk Floor El. AS) Room, Area" 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?YX NEI UEI N/AD YL NEI UO N/AlQ YX NO U[-] N/At" Y34 NEI uE]Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated b3*4Y9t:f~n Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPnnndPnr.-

Nn

  • Rq-12-171 D-60 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 6) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. .Floor El. 2,S -Room, Area 1 3 4+75 W Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of ~l UD N/AFO potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant
  • NO Ui N/Al]degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YP'ND U[] N/A[]4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y*N( N] Ul N/AO interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
  • Fluorewti 4-4-n a4ra~iaqJ 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn -RR-19-171 D-61 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg Flo-or El. ?.5' 3 Room, Area 1 SW 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YbtN[I] UEJ N/ADI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?9uAp4o n ( 10MYM s SACAy/4sIcoA

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

p 0 1 e lip' er ff~tvi W~lee lCC4'c Yf'NEI UD N/AD Y' NIl UED N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND UD adversely affect the safety fimctions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NI/A Evaluated by: f 'Date:/Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPnnnd nPNn

  • RP-19-171 D-62 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. t Floor El. itO .Room, Area 1 3_ _ ;_00 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y)( NO UEC N/A[2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YX NEI U- N/AE degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?,INa A4lýi"K? rawwivzys 1 Y'q NEI Ui N/A[:]4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YX NEI UD N/AD'interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

'3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.(< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1.CnrmQnnndinrtP Mn

  • PR-19-171 D-63 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. L. Room, Area1' i0 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

./To 4pV~fv'h Or YX( NEI UED N/Afl SNEI UEI N/AE X NEI U0 N/AE 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YdNED UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by*1 Date:< C-6 >Limerick Generating.Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPqnnndi~nri.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-64 AVJC,- 02 -30 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:( N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. 191. Room, Area"'iiLn Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YX NO UI N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YX NE! UDI N/AL]degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cabl trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YIdNEI UD N/AD]Yj ND U[] N/AL]13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.4 C-5 >" Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-65 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (TnrrPnnnHI~nr.

Nn -R.-19-171 AWC- U02 -30 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. CQZ6ý FloorEl. IT_ _ Room, Area' 1 3 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

I YXNE1 UO N/AC YW NE U[ N/AC YV NE UD N/AC 4 " Pi CNVO ,Ahý 4*mporaq tr p4061f KI eA f 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yg NO UO Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NIA Evaluated by 6'Date:Y,/V Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPnnndP.nr.P Nn

  • RR-1-171 D-66 AWC- JC-- 2ý \Sheet 1 of 2 Status:! N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. R 6 Floor El. -) Q1 Room, Area 1 3 En'r].'Cl.,e Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

NO UD N/Al 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YX NEI UD N/Al]degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y)ý NE UE] N/Al]YJk NE UD] N/A[]13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 )Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-67 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrnqnnndpnr'.P Nn

  • Rq-19-171 Nwc z- UZ1s Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. ktdr" Floor El. IQ.t. Room, Area13 J .5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?YI<ND UD N/AD YXEND UD N/AD YR NE UEJ N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: I Date: 472I< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrP-nnndPniP Nn -RR-19-171 D-68 AWC -U 0 -L Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. RFloor El. P7 Room, Area 23 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?UD N/A[]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y( NEI U[] N/AE degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YIN NEI UO N/AE]Y)iýNE UD1 N/A[: 13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SVEL item.< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-69 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrpqnnndPnr.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 A\4 C --U2I.3 2_Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. t" Room, Area 1 3 1 gs 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding

?r 4:r Y}x NI UD N/AD Y*X NO UD N/AD Yg NEI UD N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 'j NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated b'Date: J Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 CrnrrP.nnndPn'-p Nn ' RR-19-171 D-70 pýv< -U 2- -3 3, Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(f N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. I:4* Room, Area1 3 14" Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YX N] UD N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y~f NEI UD N/A]degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YX NO UE] N/ADUEJ N/AD1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-71 MPR-3801, Revision 1.nrrPqnnndPnr.P.

Nn* RR-19-171 Avc -L) Z-33 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. R f"I Floor El. _137 Room, Area13 144-5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shieldinag)?

cw ;ioorW 4v 4c4u (NO Ul- N/AO Y NO] UO N/Al YX NO UO N/AO I ý4 6eJ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yar NEI Ua?adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) aAfI Evaluated by: Date: Q/.-!'01 a OhAI~c,,L-Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrmnnndrnrc Nn RMR-19-171 D-72 Aw(--Uz..-

34 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. .Floor El. -'to Room, Area'3 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YK'NE] UE' N/AlO 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YV NE U[] N/A[degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?*No av~eA otc 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YX N[: UD N/AD YW NO UQ' N/AO 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-73 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn RR-1-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. I3 Room, Area 1 3.17 If I-.,(t.jnI .J 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?YV NEi UDI N/AL!Y&NEI UDJ N/AEI 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y) NE U'- N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

.1V4I 1', n (I-MWOrk Oi'vd J" 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YV ND UED adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NIA Evaluated by: 9auOm IVM%Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn

  • R-19.171 D-74 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: OY N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. _______ Floor El. 143 Room. Area13"l, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings;Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YJ NEI Ul- N/AO potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y%-z NEI Ull N/ALl degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?xg NOI UCl N/AC 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic:spatial V)ý NOI UI" N/ACl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should bejbased on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item..Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrqnnndP~nr'p Nn RR-19-171 D-75 Av4CU -3 She 2- of 25 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. , ,u/' Floor El. JtZ Room, Area 1 3 woo 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yq ND U[I N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?UF5AR qA-t4 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?YV NO UE- N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

r )-.Lo~ r 93.rjrIY f prj s un YX ND UD N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yk NO UI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated b-Date.ý< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 l'nrrmnnnrIP'nrP.

Nn

  • R5-19-171 D-76 AW~C-01-1ý Sheet I of 2 Status:/0 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. ji'-7 Room, Area'3.revlast i III Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YX ND UD N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YtI ND U[1 N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y)'NEJ UD N/AD YV NOl UD N/AD" 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-77 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPnnndrnrP Nn -RR-19-171 AvNC -U2-36 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. F' FloorrEl.

A1L Room, Area13 jIL 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A t-ro 4-o co 55,(4 Yý(ND UD N/AL!YX ND UEI N/AD YIý ND UDl N/AD-.0 Co ?J'4 4 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJf ND UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated I by: Date:< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn

  • PS-19-171 D-78 A\NC -u7-- 37-1 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:d N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. ______ Floor El. "313. Room, Area", L3 W Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y$KND UD N/Al]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y,1 NEI UI- N/Al degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

' rNI] Ul] N/Al]YX NE U-1 N/Al 13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrmnnnd~nri.P Nn

  • R.-19-171 D-79 AWy'C Shet 2of Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. fti " .r Floor El. 3 i.3 Room, Area 1 3 G W 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YX NEI U-I N/A[I interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Per a, rr. f,-y o ovi ey 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?YP~ NEI UD N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?-NVO 4MteO(*f/

GC- P 4 ICtO~ Oetwý 4'u,.i Yý NEi U- N/AD i1o 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y; NEI UI"I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A0 Evaluated by:&Date: I Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r~nrrP~nnndI~nr.P.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-80 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (@N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. RC -, ' Floor El. g Room, Area'3 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

X NE1 UD N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yý NEI UI N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequateand fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

NX ND UD N/AD Y4. ND UD N/AD 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of.about 35 feet from the SWEL item.*C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-81 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP.nndPnr.n Nn -RR-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. .fol'W( -Floor El. DOB Room, Area" 3 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YX Nil UDI N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

.L08j"~~ PM4~ ec YpND ULI N/AD XNEI UD1 N/ADI 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI ND UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments ,(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al/AA Evaluated b]Date: _______I -- 6/7402/Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPannnriPnrP.

Nn ' RS-1 9-171 D-82 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N V Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. r Floor El. 1- Room, Area 1 3 1!ijCj Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y)K NEI UO N/AO 2.Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y %- NEI UD N/AO degraded conditions? -A$ ý ~ J 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y;'NO UD N/AD Y(NO UD N/AD 13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area, should be based on judgment,.

e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >" Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-83 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP.nnndPnr'p Nn ' RR-19-171 AVVc-- 2~- -3 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. ITY Room, Area"aTh 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?14 YXNO UD N/A[]Yik NEI UE N/Afl I 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YX interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

k " wk~r l7k 4nlJ U- N/AEl 4044 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK N[] Uf-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al/A Evaluated b Evlute-b Dte Date: J;./'Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1..nrrP'nnn1P.nr,-.

Nn *RR-19-171 D-84 AW c, -U 2--140 Sheet I of 2 Status: 6) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. If Floor El. Room, Area13 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic, conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

'AMND UE N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant

'( NO Ui N/Al degraded conditions?

r~s ;) arra apfwr -6 6P 5viscr e ~ra45 imJ cajr dem'~eA ý ~I('V 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y]& ND UD N/ADJ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?l.1 0 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YXfND UD1 N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

-.1 3 If the room in which the SWEL itemn'is located is very large (e.g., Turbine: Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item..< C-5: >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-85 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPýnnndPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 AWC- JZ _qO Sheet 2of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. F Floor El. .2 Room, Area 1 3

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seis: interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seis: interactions that could cause a fire in the area?mic NE UD] N/AI-mic YXND UE] N/AD mic YX NI] UD N/Al]of portable d 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seisz interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lea shielding)?
8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'NEI UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al//A Evaluated b, Date: q3 /~ G?O/ -A< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrp'qnnnrhInrc.P ln

  • R5-19-171 D-86 Sheet I of 2 Status:(Y)

N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. R&9kk" Floor El. !-- Room, Area1.Eetzlmiiar 119 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YM ND UD N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y'( ND UD N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside accejle limits)?iecwy PAch etyvci 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YV NDI UD N/AD YJKND UD N/AD 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Sc-5 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-87 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrP~tnnnr1Pnr.P Nn

  • RS-19-171 AWC- UZ -1 S Sheet 2 of£2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. [:7-7 Room, a'3__!_5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y; NE] UEI N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? (b O.)5-AR (Rev.Is) ~uve qA-6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YX NEI UE N/AE Y NEI UD N/AO 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJ[ NEI UQI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

(6nf Evaluated by Date: qzk I Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrmnnndrnrP Nn

  • Rq-19-171 D-88 AO JC-U 2. -L Sheet 1 of 2 Status:( N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg, VQ Li Floor El. .233. Room, Area' 13WL.4Yj,/AV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y)( NEI UE-' N/AO potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant V NEI UE- N/AI" degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Fe~w "e, 9¶J 6 A4% Ov*g NE UD N/AO 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YX NEI UOI N/AEl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

1 3 It' the room in which the SVVEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This, selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-89 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrP-nnndiJnr.

Nn -RS-19-171 V4 C. -0 2- -q L'7- Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. "V Floor El. ;BS Room, Area 13. SU 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

w?,M. go emiary or " c v YXNE] UD N/A[Y*NO UD N/Afl YX NEI UQ N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

KI/A Evaluated by: Date: /Q II< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrmnnndPnr.n Nn

  • RR-19-171 D-90 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.Floor El. 141 Room, Area'3 I3 l5ndosuft-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YKNO UE N/AE 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant E NE UE] N/AO degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?ý Few ueA3 ovm4vaý4, Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y4 NE U-I N/AEl Yk N[ UQ N/AD'3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.-K C-5 >" Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-91 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn ' RR-19-171 A VX JC ?-1 -'LI3 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Ri& f...... Floor El. j1.-7 Room, Area13 [i'4 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?NO U0 N/AD Y(NE UE N/AE Y, NEI UI N/AE 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)Q ND UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by: Date: '1/7/w ['0/7"-nz Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrpnnndPnr-P Nn -RP.-1 9-171 D-92 AW(I -LU2.- 4 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (ON U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Floor El. 2,.. Room, Area1'3_ _ _ _ _Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YX NEI U[- N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

%,Miele tcvnfý01ý aoqg 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YX NE"I Ut] N/Al]degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic'conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e~g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N[] UL N/AE" YXN[] Ufl N/AE]13 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgmeht, e.g., on the Order of-about 35 feet from theSWEL item.'(C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-93 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPqnnndpnrp Nn

  • RA 171 FkV 2jc .-- Lf Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Ploor El. _239 Room, Area 13 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y interactions that could cause a fire. in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

,, orr" 'w) *,, ' 0O-oer-! r r4"ffUf N/AD NONE UE N/AE g1 NE U- N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by:.Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn

  • R-1 9-171 D-94 AWC-uz- '4 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:()

N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 6-O& Floor El. 0L Room, Area 1 3 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y4 NI] U]I N/AE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YP'NI"] UEJ N/AO]degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling files and lighting)?

0 fLoo(a,3a.;V

~ c ir JNI] U-] N/AI]YX NI] U] N/AI'1 If the roomin which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.4 C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-95 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP.%nnndPnr.P NAn RR-1 -171 AW c, -u2-L-'45 Sheet 2of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. ft " Floor El. W)I Room, Area" 3 2 Lf 5.~~~E Doe It appa tat thre isfcfptnill des esi 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?V1 O('5 dry 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? , , YO ND UD3 N/AD YK NLI ULI N/AD Y;K NEI UD N/AD--No 4 vm Fn1OcY or' OO I 6 to 'Prnem 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI UI"[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/4A Date: 1 zI2LA Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPqnnnd1Pnr.P Nn

  • R-19-171 D-96 At/( -Li 2. Lftd Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (m) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. ;. -Floor'El.

'_)_01 Room,.Area, 3 E~0,r Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?)X NI]3 Ut] N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YJ ND UD N/Al]degraded conditions?

.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YxND U N/ADl-6 b ~ m or ro er101y~Ovor4raj 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YM' NE UI" N/AD.interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hill), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Cnrmrnnndrnrc.P.Nn

' R,-19-171 D-97 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.

  • Floor El. ) Room, Area 1 3 2OA 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shieldng?j;1 QCL 'Jy I0VPc Y4 ND UD N/AD YX[ND U[-D N/AD xY( NDI UD N/ADI 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?YK NEIUO Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NI/A I, Evaluated by:.Date: CA Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 C.nrrAmnnnIPnrP.p Nn

  • RS-19-171 D-98 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ( N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. &Q*0 Floor El. I, .Room, AreaU' 3 i.6 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YX NEI UC N/AC 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YX NEI UEJ N/A[C degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y)NC UC N/AC YXNC UC N/AC'3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-99 MPR-3801, Revision 1.nrrm~nnndPnr.P Nn

  • RR-12-171 Awc__7-U24-1Ll Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. RetMC Floor El. )-4 Room, Area.' 34 EVVIO-s-wr

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shieldin )?Y9NO UD N/ADUD N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y>( ND UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ersb64ial FMEfcoirr#6r czroccrtv W,/ cGv9'*Date: D-100 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP-nnnfIPnr.P Nn " RR-19-171 AWC -u ýL -Li 9'Sheet 1 of 2 Status:) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YK NO UD N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y NI"] UD" N/ADl degraded conditions?

-4j -j 60 ,nr 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YgNO UD- N/AD Y) NE UD3 N/AD]V 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.< C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1.nrrm~nnnrIPnr.P Nn

  • RS-19-171 D-101 AW C _Q 7 -HY Sheet 2of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.p e FloorEl., XL RooMArea 1 3 5. Does it a]pear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

N /f *Ck"M 6fprlý e vyr I YX NEI U[J N/AD Y)'ND U- N/AD Y&ýNE UD N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YXKND UD adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by: Date: <C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrriqnnndrInrý.

Kin

  • RR-1?-171 D-102 A~wCr-V27-4~9 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. R6a L. Floor El. 1j31 Room, Area 1 3 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y)( NO U[E- N/Al]potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant
  • /( NEI U' N/A"]degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?-No oW rt, ucXI 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YeNE] Ul- N/AEJ YX NEI U- N/Al]1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.SC-5 >, Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-103 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrmnnnd1nr.P Nan R-S-19-171 AVIC-U-- 4 9 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Rerc"6r Floor El. 17"4 Room, 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

+&r-w or P04I"1Irr I Y)NE UD N/AD YX ND U-l N/AflUED N/AEl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YXNED UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments -(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated[by: A Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r2nrr.nnndPnrP Nn ' RR-12-171 D-104 Table D-2. Unit 0 Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs)AWC-UO-xx Building Equip Elev Location Base Component ID 1 Control Structure 304 Room 619E 00B132 2 Spray Pond Building 268 Room 1000 0AP506 3 Control Structure 304 Room 619 HV-078-021 B 4 Spray Pond Building 256 Room 1010 HV-12-032A 5 Spray Pond Building 268 Room 1005 0BV543 6 Control Structure 304 Room 619 HD-078-027A 7 Spray Pond Building 268 Room 1005 HD-081-041A 8 Control Structure 200 Room 258 0AK1 12 9 Spray Pond Building 268 Room 1000 PSH-12-004A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 D-105 AWC-0o- I Sheet 1 of 2 Status:Q N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.4&4,.Idi~loorEl.

J3oD Room, Area 1 3 619 F Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record-the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y&NE1 UQ N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily f opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic'conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Qq V A 1 '5 : e 0"'/hAý 1)~u att K~ LY+ Iv// D UE N/Af CNEI UCO N/AEl Y4 NO UE0 N/AEl J3 If the room in which the SVVEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-106 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrPsnnndsnrs Nn M RS-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. tg,, oor El. 3 ) t' Room, Area" 6 I? 1, 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic NE'I U[1 N/AEl irai t d cause f1poding r spray in the area; , T h'P Wwt, /9Co' + b, oa-t 004C1 rgo t" u~fi.t 2-6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?ANDI UD- N/AD3 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.. scaffolding, lead shielding)? A¢. Ld " r(.. 4 4 1 y 5WýY 4 ' hP4 fec~'6dvV4 O~f Av £q4v~ftt$1t ( IQ-' 4Qre.Y;19NE UD1 N/ADI 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NI" UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

T 1e- Ve 'Evaluated by: Date:&..< C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrP'_nnndPnr.Pi Nn

  • R,-19-171 D-107 AWC-UO-2-Sheet I of 2 Status:(O N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. -ffALYf ,.`Floor El. 'S Room, Area13 J-e,1-gCL " " Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided pt the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y;potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

1>,, , -, 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial , interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

f t PAW (400&UDZ N/AD NEI UEJ N/AD aNE'I U['I N/AD AND U[- N/AD'W1-1 UI- N/A[]33 If the room in which the"SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-108 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn

  • RR-19-171 (mc, ý U0 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg( Floor El. ' S" Room, Area'3 /&.j5U'(d; ..5. Does it appear thai'the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the a a?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yfi NEI U[ N/AQI YIN[O UEJ N/AO 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

4 j .S& &,$_)65! 0 UQ N/AQ:~4 e,#tC/x.*e 44qd~e~,~eo64e~e~tvpkrI tt~8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could )' 1-1 UnI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?CommentsAdditional pes may be added as necess g 6 1 .e. .,t .box-- Ji M.41carcty "t- ,-,'lý( 4-, cove., PLOqok o-W,,.- c ,oov' r..,o-, /.-C~'I-~ ,,oti 444 t -~ t 0,ty 5V 1411J % MO 0 ~ pO4te,,T~

V 5SIVI 'd A 4 Evaluated by.Date: -A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 f.nrrPqnnndPnr'.P Nn

  • R:-19-171 D-109

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. trT61 FloorEl. -I Room, Area13 619 Nv -ANo-.Floo El (nef. V-Q*S-OL1L Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN ND UD N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yg ND UD N/AD degraded conditions?

Mp4elor 6Or'(Q on 1oc0, dJtz- SU~PP0 4 5 ch" J occ6T66e 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports -is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?fNO ovm~eq} e01Pw'lPA

aOM~4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YE4 ND UD N/AD YX ND UD N/AD 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.,<C-5 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-110 MPR-3801, Revision 1 f.nrrpqnnndPnr.p Mn ' RR-19-171 AM/C --iO-3 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. 6pnfv Floor El. 3"04 .Room, Area"3 ý9 (neur wy-01-094I8)

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YX NEI U[E N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Y< NO UO N/AD YPND UD N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

-Afo p 4 Or f~ZO2/ ~ %t 03"ec 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments,(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by I Date: Iv r/Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 ,nrrPgnnnrdPnr'P.

Nn ' R,-19-171 D-111 AWC -uO- A Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 0 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Loctin: ld. o rFlor 1.7 Sb Room, Area'1 3 M /4 ?Instructions for Comp'eting Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YMNEI UED N/AO1 0 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

/qa V&oe- OV.,r YJ34qO] UV1 N/AO as 45 4lea 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

IV#,~~,, NE U[ N/AE 4 No UO N/AD , 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-112 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPnnndH.nr.o Nn

  • RR-19-171 Awvc -Uo -4 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)MO~ ¶1/7 Location:

Bldg. PIVII Floor El. .2IS Room, Area'1 3 /01 5. Does it appear thA( the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactio~ns t od cause a fire in the area?VOA id,,44,1 rt 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

40-O UO N/AO YA*O U' N/ADUE- N/AO" 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI UO1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated Date: 46J~LA~< C-.6>Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1..

Nn RR-19-171 D-113 Sheet I of 2 Status: ()N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. oFloor El. ArRom, A a 3_Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yx--r UD N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y% NE UD N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a ,isual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse.seismic. conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lih in ?-J O ... ..ND UD N/AD ,?Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-114 MPR-3801, Revision 1 f.lnrrPqnnndPnrPA Nn RA-19-171 AWL '.JLO -Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.

  • of*7 Pu 1 ioor El. g o Room, Area".1005 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YOND UO N/AO YANO-INDUQ N/AD ALND UD N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: g'ie7 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPqnnnrIPdnn-.

Nn

  • RR-12-171 D-115 r4WC_-UQU Sheet I of 2 Status: ( N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. C VI Floor El. Room, Area" 6/'3.(rleor 14 0 -v M7-v v ..... /Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YK NE UD N/Al 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YM NEI UD N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YJ4 ND UD N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y. NO UD N/AD.interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

P 'uc -aft64 he1i kol>P 4 Trith open "' -ok Jrew~C3 crfWe 6~ 04 ia v, 04c-,w %A -ormw sc 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.<C-5 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-116 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP.nnndPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171

-AWC-UO-6 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Loction: Bldg. .Floor El. "'O3 -Room, Area3li Lq (r4 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

i Nf 0 foAq\e or "OmryV r 1.40-7s-G-17-6)

  • j NO UD N/AD YK ND U- N/AD Yb NO UO N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y1 ND U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

A*/A Evaluated by: .W , Date: A C-6 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 ('nrr.nnndPnr..

Nn ' RS-19-171 D-117 AWJC- UO -T Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. F Olyloorl Room, Area'3_ __ _ _ _ _ _Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1Dosanchorage of equipment in the area appear to be -free of Y&JN'i UI"3 N/A[: potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y, N[" U- N/AUl degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceijing tiles and lighting)? e .. -~l e,ý " n Y)4NEI U[J N/AU Y3eLNE UEU N/AUl P I 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.4 c-5,>Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-118 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrmnnnr1-nrP Nn ' R.R-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC).1 -I"U-Location:

Bldg. -' ., i Floor El. 2Z Room, Area'3 " 5. Does it appear that the area is free ofpotentiall atverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or sp [ltVIre area?d V 657 YZNE UD N/AD 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adver interactions that could cause a fire in the area?IV0f (r A IU414,/i rse seismic Y UD N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YXNI"I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? " -;:% 4o 6L 1 A i .-'"-"-%, L.o'l c'-fS 0" N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y16NEI UEI Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrP'qnnndPne.p Nn" RR-19-171 D-119 AWC, UO- I Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ( N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. C6. Floor El. a.t() Room, Area1'3 Instfructions for Compfleting Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

¢ b, r f..,, 4 f ,ai"!ND U" N/Al 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantl NEI-degraded conditions?

UI- N/ADl 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting-appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?NO NO UQ- N/AU 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yo, NDI OU'l N/AD1 interactions with other equipment in the area(e.g., ceiling tiles and c *4'. I br- -- I.aA0 1 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected areashould be.based onjudgment,.e.g., on the order of about.35 feet from the SWEVL item:<C-5 )Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn ' RR-19-171 D-120 Awc -V0 -16 Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.Iwl 1. -Floor El. 2,W Room, Area13 05ý9 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic %' ,NO UD N/AO interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?H5 ci r P14 V0 6. Does it appear that the area ee of potentially adverse seismic uN /intera~ctiq s that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic 0 Nr U- N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y)ZNDUD Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: T17L/Lk7-V -Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn

  • R.R-19-171 D-121 Page: 1 Document Name: untitled------------------------------

MECHANICALCOMPONENT -PAGE 1 COMMAND INPUT => MISCELLANEOUS DISPLAY MODE LAST UPDATE : 04/02/09 UNIT-SYSTEM

LO 1 026 CMP FEG : LG 1 026 RRM _ RECORD NUMBER: 0000000000 CMP TYPE : K MISC CLEAR PT: _ OPS: RECORD STATUS: F REV : CMP NUMBER : 10-S405 SPEC TXT RES POSITION : CMP DESCRIPT : RECOMBINER ROOMS & H2 ANALYZERCOMPARTMENTS EXHAUST RADIATION MONITORING RACK HYDROGEN & OXYGEN RECOMB RAD MONITOR X MANUFACTURER
G080 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY MODEL NUMBER : 368X256G002 CAT MFG TYPE : VB BOM NUMBER : 001 LG_ COMP ADDRESS : _ MFG STYLE : SERIAL NUMBER: 7901-2C AREA/ELEV/RM:

008 200 258 TECHNICAL REFERENCES QA CLASS: kI TECH SPEC: TYPE "C" TO VIEW CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED FEGS MESSAGE: FINAL -RECORD IS IN THE AS-BUILT CONDITION; NO CHANGES PENDING Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Date: 8/@W (12Rd'din4t:

1:23:31 PM f..nrrpqnnndp.nr.p Nn -Rq-19-171 D-122 A~c -UO-q Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (g) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. Se CY potd Floor El. .- A< Room, Area 1 3 g"o g g,, p 0+.-f, , ", Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist'may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used torecord the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I. Does anchorage of equipment, in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y[P'ND UEI N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y&'ND UD N/All degraded conditions?

cL v.R k,6 .eo.i- , ,B otS -rrp ca U c , v4 A °"- o " 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y[MIND UO N/AD Y2/NE3 UD N/AD..13 If the room in Which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based.on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.C0-5.>Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 D-123 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (, nrrmnnndPnrP.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 WC -UO -I Sheet 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg.,3f"'Y Fo,< Floor El. Z,(, Room, Area1 3 (oo 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?/Y[E2ND UD N/AD e2' £f 6y ,'-tds I 4~ Jetj-.',c-1;9 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YER'ND UD N/AD Yg 4 NDE UD N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yfff NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 4~- Dae: 12 Date:1/2, Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 f.nrrPnnndnP.nr Nn -RR-19-171 D-124 E Plan for Walkdown of Inaccessible Equipment and Assessment of Electrical Cabinet Internal Inspections E.1. PLAN FOR WALKDOWN OF INACCESSIBLE EQUIPMENT As shown in the SWEL for Limerick Unit 2 in Appendix B, Table B-3 items have been deferred until the next refueling outage (RFO). Table E-1 summarizes the reasons each item is inaccessible during normal plant operation, and notes the planned Seismic Walkdown date. Limerick Station Work Order (WO) # C0244988 has been written to schedule the Seismic Walkdowns (and Area Walk-Bys) for these items.All items in Table E-1 will be walked down during the next RFO in the second quarter of 2013.Table E-1. Summary of Inaccessible Equipment Component ID Description Reason for Component IDescInaccessibility HV-41-2F022A Inboard Main Steam Isolation Valve Located in drywell Located in main HV-41-2F028A Outboard Main Steam Isolation Valve steam tunnel/MSIV room HV- 41-2F0741 FDVVTR Inboard Isolation Valve Located in drywell 2F074A HV-51-2F041A 2A LPCI HDR Testable Check and Located in drywell Bypass PCIV 2C LPCI HDR Testable Check and HV-51-2F041C BasPCVLocated in drywell Bypass PCIV ________PSV Main Steam Line Safety/Relief Valve on 2FO1E MS'A1Located in drywell 2F013E MSLA 'A'______2AV212 DW Chiller Fan Located in drywell TE-41-201D Suppression Pool Temperature Division I Located in drywell 20E21 0 HPCI Turbine Barometric Condenser Requires removal of insulation 2ET003 E Main Steam Relief Valve (MSRV) Located in drywell 2ET003 __Accumulator Tank 2ST003 MSRV Accumulator Tank Located in drywell Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 E-1 E.2. ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRICAL CABINET INTERNAL INSPECTIONS All electrical cabinets on the SWEL require assessment of the need for inspections to address the potential for "other adverse seismic conditions" internal to the cabinet. This assessment is required due to an NRC clarification of their expectations for seismic walkdowns, which was received after the online seismic walkdowns were completed.

Tables E-2 (for Unit 2) and E-3 (for Unit 0) list all electrical items that require assessment.

Accessibility of equipment, basis for accessibility determination, completion date of internal inspections, tracking number (if internal inspection has not yet been performed) and inspection results are provided in these tables.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 E-2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 Table E-2. Assessment of Unit 2 Electrical Cabinet Internal Inspections Tracking Status I Accessible If Not Accessible, Why? Milestone Completion Number Inspection n(YN) (IR Number) Results D214-R-C Reactor Area (01) Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A 2023 Safeguard 480 V MCC 20B515 Diesel Gen Area 480V MCC (01) Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A D214 Reactor Area (02) Low Voltage Switchgear and Breaker Panels N* Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A 208201 Safeguard Load Center 208204 Reactor Area 480V (02) Low Voltage Switchgear and Breaker Panels N' Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A Safeguard Load Center 20A118 D24 4160 SWGR (03) Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchgear N' Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A Division IV 4KV SWGR 20X109 Room 120 VAC Instrument (04) Transformers N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A Panel XFMR A Main Control Room 20X283 Structure HVAC 120 VAC (04) Transformers N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A Distribution Panel Transformer 20Y104 DIV. IV S.F.G.D. 120 VAC (14) Distribution Panels and Automatic Transfer Switches N Tools required for disassembly N/A NIA N/A Instrument Panel A Reactor Enclosure HVAC N/A N/A N/A 20Y206 120 VAC Distribution Panel (14) Distribution Panels and Automatic Transfer Switches N Tools required for disassembly 2BD105 125/250V DC Fuse Box (14) Distribution Panels and Automatic Transfer Switches N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A 2AD160 A RPS & UPS Distribution (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Y NIA December 2014 1436078 Scheduled 1 Panel Static Inverter 28D160 B RPS & UPS Distribution (1December 2013 1436081 Scheduled Panel Static Inverter 6) Battery Chargers and Inverters Y N/A 2DD103 Battery Charger (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Y N/A Li2R12, April 2013 1436085 Scheduled 20C201 Remote Shutdown Vertical (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A 818/2012 N/A SAT Board 20C602 Reactor Recirc Panel '20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A 8/8/2012 N/A SAT 20C603 Reactor Control Panel (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A 8/8/2012 N/A SAT 20C609 RPS Channel "A" Vertical (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A a(812012 N/A SAT Board 20C626 ADS Control Room Panels (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A 8/8/2012 N/A SAT 20C647 Panel HPCI Vertical Board (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A 18/12012 N/A SAT 20TB-053 Rack / Panel (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels N Tools required for disassembly N/A WA N/A 2AC208 Unit Coolers Control Panel (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A 8/8/2012 N/A SAT 2AD106 125 /250V DC Transducer (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A Panel 2AJ860 ESS DIV I (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A Main Steam Relief Valve 2BS921 Position Transmitter Pro- (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A Amp ftIck GerM Ov'ta Stdon UOn 2 Mpe-30m. e.n Ia Corrnd-ftnc NoS5-12-Ml E-3 Table E-2. Assessment of Unit 2 Electrical Cabinet Internal Inspections Accessible Tracking Status I Component ID Descd(ption EPRI Equipment Class Aesl If Not Accessible, Why? Milestone Completion Number Inspection (IR Number) Results 2DC563 Diesel Enclosure HVAC (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A 8/9/2012 N/A SAT Control Panel 2DC661 Panel D-Safeguard System (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A 8/8/2012 N/A SAT Vertical Board 2DG502 EDG Excitation System (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels Y N/A 8/9/2012 N/A SAT Cabinet Item was opened (with tools) by maintenance so that internal anchorage could be confirmed, and no anomalies or other adverse seismic conditions were observed.Table E-3. Assessment of Unit 0 Electrical Cabinet Internal Inspections Component ID Description EPRI Equipment Class Accessible (YN) If Not Accessible, Why? Milestone Tracking Number Status I C o m p o n e nt IiC o m p le tio n (IR N u m be r) In s p e c tio n Results 008132 Control Enclosure Safeguard 440V MCC (01) Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted N Tools required for disassembly NIA N/A N/A Contactors 00B519 Spray Pond 440V AC Power MCC (01) Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A___B5__ Spray__Pond_4_0VACPowerMCC Contactors 01X566 DIV I Spray Pond Pump Structure 120V AC (04) Transformers N Tools required for disassembly N/A N/A N/A Instrument Panel XFMR OAC564 ontrol Panel Spray Pond Pump Structure 8/3/2012 NA SAT Ctroply Panel (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels V N/A OCC687 ESW Division III Control Panel (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels V N/A 8/3/2012 N/A SAT L~lxodk G.Waing Sate, UnM 2 MPR-38tr.

Re~lO"'conn~~.No.:

RS-12-171 E-4 F Peer Review Report This appendix includes the Peer Review Team's report, including the signed Peer Review Checklist for SWEL from Appendix F of the EPRI Seismic Walkdown Guidance (Reference 1).Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-1 Peer Review Report for Near Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown of Limerick Unit 2 Peer Reviewers:

Patrick Butler (Team Leader)Craig Swanner Caroline Schlaseman Patrick Butler, P.E.Peer Review Team Leader Signature Date 10/12/2012 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-2 Contents F. 1 Introduction

....................................................................................................

4 F .1 .1 O v e rv ie w ....................................................................................................................

4 F.1.2 Peer Reviewers

....................................................................................................

4 F.1.3 SW EL Development

................................................................................................

5 F. 1.4 Seismic W alkdown ..................................................................................................

5 F.2 Peer Review -Selection of SSCs ....................................................................

6 F .2 .1 P u rp o s e ......................................................................................................................

6 F.2.2 Peer Review Activity -Selection of SSCs ...........................................................

6 F.2.3 Peer Review Findings -Selection of SSCs .........................................................

7 F.2.4 Resolution of Peer Review Comments -Selection of SSCs ................................

7 F.2.5 Conclusion of Peer Review -Selection of SSCs ...................................................

8 F.3 Review of Sample Checklist

& Area Walk-Bys ..............................................

9 F.4 Review of Licensing Basis Evaluations

.......................................................

14 F.5 References

.......................................................................................................

15 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-3 F.1 Introduction F.1.1 OVERVIEW This report documents the independent peer review for the Near Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdowns performed by MPR Associates, Inc.for Unit 2 of Limerick Station. The peer review addresses the following activities: " Review of the selection of the structures, systems, and components, (SSCs)that are included in the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL),* Review of a sample of the checklists prepared for the Seismic Walkdowns

&Walk-Bys,* Review of any licensing basis evaluations," Review of the decisions for entering the potentially adverse conditions in to the plant's Corrective Action Program (CAP), and* Review of the final submittal report.F.1.2 PEER REVIEWERS The Peer Reviewers are Patrick Butler, Caroline Schlaseman and Craig Swanner. Mr.Butler is the Peer Review Team Leader, per the EPRI Seismic Walkdown Guidance (Reference 1). As Peer Review Team Leader, he was responsible for the entire peer review process, including completion of the final peer review documentation in this report. The Peer Reviewers' qualifications are briefly summarized as follows:* Mr. Butler is a degreed mechanical engineer and has over twenty-five years of nuclear power experience.

Mr. Butler and has been trained as a Seismic Capability Engineer (EPRI SQUG training) and is the primary author of EPRI SQUG Guidelines for the use of the SQUG Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for new and replacement components and equipment.

  • Ms. Schlaseman is a degreed civil/structural engineer and has over 30 years of nuclear power experience.

Ms. Schlaseman and has been trained as a Seismic Capability Engineer and EPRI Seismic Walkdown Engineer (SWE), has performed USI A-46 (SQUG) seismic walkdowns for two stations, and is a principal investigator in (EPRI) document 1025286, "Seismic Walkdown Guidance:

For Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic," which is the guidance document for performing the walkdowns documented in this report.* Mr. Swanner is a degreed aerospace engineer with 20 years of nuclear plant experience.

Mr. Swanner has been trained as a Seismic Capability Engineer and EPRI Seismic Walkdown Engineer (SWE).Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 F-4 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 Mr. Butler, Ms. Schlaseman and Mr. Swanner are registered professional engineers.

F.1.3 SWEL DEVELOPMENT The SWEL development was performed by Mr. Tom King. The initial peer review of the SWEL development was performed by Mr. Butler and Mr. Swanner, and was conducted between July 18, 2012 and August 8, 2012. There were two observations noted on the SWEL Peer Review Checklist but no findings were cited. The completed SWEL Peer Review Checklist is found in Attachment 1 to this Appendix.

The discussion for the SWEL development peer review is provided in Section F.2. Note that due to equipment accessibility including ALARA and electrical safety concerns, changes to the SWEL were made as the walkdowns were conducted.

The Peer Review Team did review changes made during the walkdown and has reviewed the final SWEL included in Appendix C of the Walkdown Report. As noted in the SWEL Peer Review Checklist, there were no items from IPEEE equipment class 11, Motor-Generators.

This was because there are no safety-related Seismic Category I motor generators at Limerick Unit 2. Also, the SWEL only includes 3 items of new or replacement equipment.

The low number of new equipment on the SWEL is because Limerick Unit 2 has not made significant changes to Seismic Category I equipment.

F.1.4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN The peer review of the seismic walkdowns was performed by Mr. Butler and Ms.Schlaseman on-site and during follow-up reviews. The review included approximately 25% of the total SWC or AWC applicable to the equipment including checklists, photos, and drawings where applicable.

Interviews were conducted with both teams of SWEs to assess conduct of the walkdowns and adherence to the EPRI Seismic Walkdown Guidance (Reference 1). The discussion of the review of the sample of Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs) and Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs) is provided in Section F.3.The assessment of condition reports (IRs) with respect to current licensing basis is provided in Section F.4. These assessments and their outcomes were also discussed with the SWE inspection team in order to completely understand the issues.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 F-5 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F.2 Peer Review -Selection of SSCs F.2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to describe the process to perform the peer review of the selected structures, systems, and components, (SSCs) that were included in the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL).F.2.2 PEER REVIEW ACTIVITY -SELECTION OF SSCs The guidance in Section 3 of the EPRI Seismic Walkdown Guidance (Reference

1) was used as the basis for this review.This peer review of SWEL 1 was based on reviews of preliminary documents provided by the SWEL preparer, Mr. Tom King. Additionally, the Peer Reviewers interviewed Mr. King. Reference 1 Appendix F: "Checklist for Peer Review of SSC Selection," was used by the Peer Reviewers to guide their review.For SWEL 1 development, the following actions were completed in the peer review process:* Verification that the SSCs selected represented a diverse sample of the equipment required to perform the following five safety functions:

o Reactor Reactivity Control o Reactor Coolant Pressure Control o Reactor Coolant Inventory Control o Decay Heat Removal o Containment Function This peer review determined that the SSCs selected for the seismic walkdowns represent a diverse sample of equipment required to perform the five safety functions.

  • Verification that the SSCs selected include an appropriate representation of items having the following sample selection attributes:

o Various types of systems o Major new and replacement equipment o Various types of equipment o Various environments o Equipment enhanced based on the findings of the IPEEE o Risk insight consideration This peer review determined that the SSCs selected for the seismic walkdowns include an appropriate sample of items that represent each attribute/consideration identified Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-6 above. The justification for this conclusion is: a) Based on a review of the UFSAR and SWEL 1 list, it was determined that an appropriate variety of equipment and systems are represented (e.g., EDG, HPCI, RCIC, Core Spray, RHR, CRD Scram Hydraulic, Emergency Service Water, and Batteries);

b) The "New and Replacement" equipment are indicated as such; c) A variety of location environments are included (e.g., Diesel Rooms, Reactor Building, Drywell, and Diesel Oil Storage Tank Underground Structure);

d) The SWEL identifies that there are no IPEEE Enhancement related equipment; and e) Risk Significant equipment items are clearly identified on the SWEL. Additional details for these conclusions are presented in Attachment 1: Peer Review Checklist for SWEL.There are no SWEL 2 items for Limerick Unit 2. To confirm the appropriateness of this conclusion, the following actions were completed in the peer review process: Verification that spent fuel pool (SFP) related Seismic Category I SSCs were considered and appropriate justification was documented for why these items were not added to the SWEL 2.This peer review determined that the few spent fuel pool related items that are Seismic Category I were given appropriate consideration and justification for exclusion from SWEL 2.Verification that the potential for rapid drain down of the SFP, including potential for siphoning, was considered in accordance with the Reference 1 guidance, and appropriate justification was documented for no items being added to SWEL 2.This peer review determined that appropriate consideration and justification were provided for there being no items identified that could result in rapid drain down. There is no equipment that could result in rapid draindown and Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleanup piping includes holes drilled 1 foot 6 inches below the normal fuel pool level specifically intended to prevent siphoning (See Section 4.3 of the Walkdown Report as well as Attachment 1 to this Appendix).

F.2.3 PEER REVIEW FINDINGS -SELECTION OF SSCs This peer review found that the process for selecting SSCs that were added to the SWEL was consistent with the process outlined in Section 3 of Reference 1.The Peer Review Checklist is provided as Attachment 1 to this Appendix with additional observations documented as appropriate.

One of the observations was that no equipment located in the primary containment was represented on the final SWEL. A subsequent decision was made based on industry input and benchmarking to include components within the Primary Containment.

Another observation was that in cases where ventilation fans were included in the SWEL, any associated dampers should also be included because operation of the dampers is critical to operation of the fans.This peer review resulted in no additional findings.F.2.4 RESOLUTION OF PEER REVIEW COMMENTS -SELECTION OF SSCS All comments requiring resolution were incorporated prior to completion of this peer review.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 F-7 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F.

2.5 CONCLUSION

OF PEER REVIEW -SELECTION OF SSCs This peer review concludes that the process for selecting SSCs to be included on the seismic walkdown equipment list appropriately followed the process outlined in Reference 1, Section 3: Selection of SSCs. It is further concluded that the SWEL sufficiently represents a broad population of plant Seismic Category I equipment and systems to meet the objectives of the NRC 50.54(f) Letter.-VxAt;C.,& -BRA L Peer Reviewer: Date 10/10/2012 Peer Reviewer: Date 10/10/2012 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-8 F.3 Review of Sample Checklist

& Area Walk-Bys The on-site and follow-up peer reviews of the seismic walkdowns were performed by Mr. Patrick Butler and Ms. Caroline Schlaseman.

The Peer Review Team reviewed Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWC) and Area Walk-by Checklists (AWC) and interviewed the walkdown team members regarding details in checklists.

For Unit 2, there were two walkdown teams, which each consisted of two Seismic Walkdown Engineers (SWEs). The first team consisted of Mr. Craig Swanner and Mr. Mojtaba Oghbaei.The second team consisted of Mr. James Wiggin and Mr. Tom King.Table F.3-1 lists the Limerick Unit 2 SWC and AWC sampling which represents approximately 25% of the SWC or AWC applicable to this equipment for Unit 2.Table F.3-1. Table of SWC and AWC Samples from Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID (Applicable AWC Description Equipment Class Location Observations Number)FT-51-2N001 RHR HTX A & Temperature Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-22) Pump A Sensor/Local Room 370W, El. SWC or AWC Discharge Flow Instrument 217' applicable to this (IPEEE Class equipment or its# 17) conclusions were identified.

20B213 D214-R-C Motor Control Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-23) Reactor Area Centers/Low

& Room 580W, El. SWC or AWC Safeguard 480V Medium Voltage 283' applicable to this Motor Control Switchgear equipment or its Center (IPEEE Class conclusions were# 01) identified.

20C001 Division I Core Instruments on Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-22) Spray System Racks Room 370W, El. SWC or AWC Instrument Rack (IPEEE Class 217' applicable to this# 16) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

LT-42-215A Reactor Level Instruments on Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-28) Racks Room 475W, El. SWC or AWC (IPEEE Class 253' applicable to this# 16) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-9 Table F.3-1. Table of SWC and AWC Samples from Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID (Applicable AWC Description Equipment Class Location Observations Number)SV-47-2F009 CRD SCRAM Solenoid Operated Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-26) Discharge Valves Room 475, El. 253' SWC or AWC Isolation Pilot (IPEEE Class applicable to this Solenoid Valve # 07) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

20B201 D214 Reactor Motor Control Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-37) Area Safeguard Centers/Low

& Room 638W, El. SWC or AWC Load Center Medium Voltage 313 applicable to this Switchgear equipment or its (IPEEE Class conclusions were# 01) identified.

20B204 Reactor Area Motor Control Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-38) 480V Safeguard Centers/Low

& Room 580W, El. SWC or AWC Load Center Medium Voltage 283' applicable to this Switchgear equipment or its (IPEEE Class conclusions were# 01) identified.

20C026 RPV Level & Instruments on Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-26) Pressure Racks Room 475, El. 253' SWC or AWC Instrument Rack (IPEEE Class applicable to this# 16) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

2BS252 B PCIG/ADS Vertical Tanks or Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-21) Nitrogen Bottles Heat Exchangers Room 370E, El. SWC or AWC (IPEEE Class 217' applicable to this# 19) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

PDT-51-206B LPCI Line Temperature Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-27) Differential Sensors/Local Room 475E, El. SWC or AWC Pressure Instruments 253' applicable to this (IPEEE Class equipment or its# 17) conclusions were identified.

PT-42-203B Reactor Coolant Temperature Reactor Enclosure, No issues with the (AWC U2-27) Pressure Sensors/Local Room 475E, El. SWC or AWC Instruments 253' applicable to this (IPEEE Class equipment or its# 17) conclusions were identified.

Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-10 Table F.3-1. Table of SWC and AWC Samples from Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID (Applicable AWC Description Equipment Class Location Observations Number)20TB-053 Rack / Panel Control Panels & Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-1) (Terminal Box) Cabinets Building, Room SWC or AWC (IPEEE Class 315A, El. 217' applicable to this# 18) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

2BT528 Diesel Vertical Tanks & Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-5) Generator Day Heat Exchangers Building, Room SWC or AWC Tank (IPEEE Class 316B, El. 217' applicable to this# 19) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

2A1T558 Diesel Vertical Tanks & Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-1) Generator Heat Exchangers Building, Room SWC or AWC Starting Air (IPEEE Class 315A, El. 217' applicable to this Reservoir

  1. 19) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

2AG501 D21 Diesel Engine Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-1) Generator Generators Building, Room SWC or AWC (IPEEE Class 315A, El. 217' applicable to this# 15) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

2A1 K513 Diesel Air Compressors Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-1) Generator (IPEEE Class Building, Room SWC or AWC Starting Air # 10) 315A, El. 217' applicable to this Compressor equipment or its conclusions were identified.

2AV512 DIESEL Fans & Air Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-3) GENERATOR/

Handlers Building, Room SWC or AWC Room (IPEEE Class 315A, El. 217' applicable to this Ventilation Fan # 08) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

TD-081-202A Vent Air Exhaust Fans & Air Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-4) Fan Damper Handlers Building, Room SWC or AWC (IPEEE Class 315A, El. 217' applicable to this# 08) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-11 Table F.3-1. Table of SWC and AWC Samples from Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID (Applicable AWC Description Equipment Class Location Observations Number)HV-1 1-233A ESW EDG JW Motor Operated Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-1) Cooling Isolation Valves Building, Room SWC or AWC Valve (IPEEE Class 315A, El. 217' applicable to this# 06) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

LSHL-20-222A Diesel Temperature Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-2) Generator Day Sensors/Local Building, Room SWC or AWC Tank Hi / Low Instruments 316A, El. 217' applicable to this Level (IPEEE Class equipment or its# 17) conclusions were identified.

2AT564 Diesel Horizontal Tanks Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-4) Generator

& Heat Building, Room SWC or AWC Jacket Water Exchangers 315A, El. 217' applicable to this Expansion (IPEEE Class equipment or its Tanks # 20) conclusions were identified.

2DC563 Diesel Control Panels & Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-6) Enclosure Cabinets Building, Room SWC or AWC HVAC Control (IPEEE Class 315D, El. 217' applicable to this Panel # 18) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

2DG502 EDG Excitation Control Panels & Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-7) System Cabinet Cabinets Building, Room SWC or AWC (IPEEE Class 315D, El. 217' applicable to this# 18) equipment or its conclusions were identified.

2AS575 Diesel Horizontal Tanks Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-1) Generator

& Heat Building, Room SWC or AWC Exhaust Exchangers 315A, El. 217' applicable to this Silencer (IPEEE Class equipment or its# 20) conclusions were identified.

Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-1 2 Table F.3-1. Table of SWC and AWC Samples from Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID (Applicable AWC Description Equipment Class Location Observations Number)PDSH-20-222A D/G Oil XFER Temperature Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-1) Suction Sensors/Local Building, Room SWC or AWC Instruments 315A, El. 217' applicable to this (IPEEE Class equipment or its# 17) conclusions were identified.

TISH-20-221A Diesel Oil Day Temperature Diesel Generator No issues with the (AWC U2-2) Tank 2AT528 Sensors/Local Building, Room SWC or AWC High Temp Stop Instruments 316A, El. 217' applicable to this XFER Pump (IPEEE Class equipment or its# 17) conclusions were identified.

Peer Reviewer: Date 10/10/2012 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-13 F.4 Review of Licensing Basis Evaluations There were no instances identified during the walkdowns where evaluated components could not readily be shown to meet the plant seismic licensing basis. Accordingly, no licensing basis evaluations to determine if equipment complied with current seismic licensing basis requirements were required.

However, there were some anomalies or conditions adverse to quality that were identified during the walkdowns.

Tables 5-2 and 5-3 in the main body of the report provide a list of the anomalies encountered during the Unit 2 seismic walkdown inspections and how they were addressed.

The Peer Review Team had no issues or concerns associated with any of the conditions identified, operability determinations performed, or proposed actions to resolve the issues.-V24e4-BRAL Peer Reviewer: Date 10/12/2012 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-14 F/=5 References

1. EPRI Technical Report 1025286, Seismic Walkdown Guidance for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, dated June 2012.Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-1 5 Attachment 1: Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Peer Review Checklist for SWEL -Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Instructions for Completing Checklist This peer review checklist may be used to document the review of the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) in accordance with Section 6: Peer Review. The space below each question in this checklist should be used to describe any findings identified during the peer review process and how the SWEL may have changed to address those findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Were the five safety functions adequately represented in the SWEL I selection?

YZ NEI All five safety functions were included in the SWEL Selection.

2. Does SWEL 1 include an appropriate representation of items having the following sample selection attributes:
a. Various types of systems? YE NEI A wide variety of systems were represented including, Emergency Diesel Generators and Auxiliaries, Residual Heat Removal, Reactor Core Isolation Cooling, Core Spray, High Pressure Coolant Injection, Control Drive Hydraulic, Low Pressure Coolant Injection, 125 VDC, 120 VAC, 480 VAC, Main Steam, and Automatic Depressurization.
b. Major new and replacement equipment?

Y2 NEI The SWEL identifies new equipment that has been added to the plant and is within the scope of the walkdowns including 2BE205 (2B RHR Heat Exchanger), and 2AP514 (Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer Pump). Limerick Unit 2 has not made significant modifications to Seismic Category I equipment.

Accordingly, there is not a large number of new and replacement components.

c. Various types of equipment?

YZ NEI All of the IPEEE equipment classes are represented with the exception of Class#11, Motor Generators.

There are no Seismic Category I motor generators at Limerick Unit 2.d. Various environments?

YO NEI Equipment in various environments including the Diesel Generator Building, Reactor Building, Control Structure and Drywell are included.

Note that walkdowns of equipment in the Drywell have been deferred until a refuel outage when the drywell can be accessed.e. Equipment enhanced based on the findings of the IPEEE (or equivalent)

YIl NEI program?There was no equipment that was enhanced based on findings of the IPEEE (see Walkdown Report Sections 4.2 and 7 and Walkdown Report References 13 and 14).Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 F-16 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL -Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 f Were risk insights considered in the development of SWEL 1? YI NEI The plant Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) was reviewed and used to guide selection of the components on SWEL 1. Specifically, the relative risk significance of candidate components including the Risk Achievement Worth (RAW) and Fussell-Vesely importance for a Loss of Off-Site Power (LOOP) scenario from the intemal plant PRA were used (See Section 4.2 of the report).3. For SWEL 2: a. Were spent fuel pool related items considered, and if applicable included in YI NEI SWEL 2?Both parts of SWEL 2, assessment of Seismic Category I spent fuel pool (SFP)related equipment and equipment that could potentially result in rapid drain-down of the SFP were considered.

See documentation of SFP item review in Section 4.3 of the Report.b. Was an appropriate justification documented for spent fuel pool related items YS NEI not included in SWEL 2?As noted in Section 4.3 of the report, the SFP-related Seismic Category I equipment includes the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) cross-tie, the Emergency Service Water (ESW) make-up supply line and the Spent Fuel Pool Skimmer Tank. The RHR and ESW components are spool pieces and manual valves that are in-line components with minimal extension of their operators (e.g., handwheels).

These components are determined to be seismically adequate based on explicit analysis in accordance with ASME Codes rules for piping. Additionally, due to their inherent seismic ruggedness and performance in strong-motion earthquakes, manual valves are not included in the EPRI Guidance Document (Reference

1) classes of equipment requiring walkdowns.

The SFP Skimmer Tanks are in a high radiation area and are not accessible during normal operation or during a refueling outage.Section 4.3 also includes appropriate justification that there are no items of equipment that could cause rapid drain-down due to lack of penetrations within about 10 feet above the top of the fuel racks, and there are adequate anti-syphon features included in piping that terminate within a few feet of the tops of the fuel racks.4. Provide any other comments related to the peer review of the SWELs.The Peer Review team had some comments regarding the safety functions for some of the components included in the SWEL. In addition, the SWEL included a number of ventilation fans, but not the dampers that must open to allow the fans to deliver their required air flow. The Peer Review team identified that the dampers must be evaluated in addition to the fans to assure that fan design basis function is maintained during a seismic event. Input has been provided to the preparer of the SWEL and corrections have been made.5. Have all peer review comments been adequately addressed in the final SWEL?YZ NE Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-17 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL -Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Patrick Butler, P. E.Peer Reviewer#1:-Vx"-BWV4L Date: 10/12/2012 Craig Swanner, P.E.Peer Reviewer#2: Date: 10/12/2012 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-171 F-18 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 180-Day Response to 50.54(f) Letter NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic November 19, 2012 Page 7 Enclosure 3

SUMMARY

OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS The following table identifies commitments made in this document. (Any other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions. They are described to the NRC for the NRC's information and are not regulatory commitments.)

COMMITTED 1 COMMITMENT TYPE COMMITMENT DATE OR ONE-TIME ACTION PROGRAMMATIC I 'OUTAGE (Yes/No) (Yes/No)1. Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) will Li1R15 Yes No complete the walkdown of the ten (10) LGS Spring 2014 Unit 1 items deferred due to inaccessibility.

2. EGC will complete the supplemental Li1 R1 5 Yes No inspections of the three (3) LGS Unit 1 Spring 2014 electrical items identified in Tables E-2 and E-3.3. EGC will complete the walkdown of the Li2R12 Yes No eleven (11) LGS Unit 2 items deferred due to Spring 2013 inaccessibility.
4. EGC will complete the supplemental December 31, Yes No inspections of the three (3) LGS Unit 2 2014 electrical items identified in Tables E-2 and E-3.
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12342A102&oldid=1363099"