ML18130A411
| ML18130A411 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1986 |
| From: | VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18130A413 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 NUDOCS 8604070133 | |
| Download: ML18130A411 (864) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.* CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW FINAL
SUMMARY
REPORT
~- .
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Surry Power Station Volume 1
*l
.--- -~-* 8664-070133 86033-1-**.
PDR ADOCK 05000280 I r p PDR '
TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES V
-I LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS vi
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 1.1 CRDR Program Structure 1 1.2 Review and Assessment 2 1.3 Review Procedur.es 4 1.4 Documentation and Document Control 7 1.5 Management and Staffing 12 1.6 Assessment and Disposition of HEDs 12
- 1. 7 Implementation 14
- 2.0 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW 2.1 2.2 Operator Questionnaires and Interviews Documentation Review 15 15 21 3.0 CONTROL ROOM SURVEY 23 3.1 Workspace Survey 25 3.2 Anthropometric Survey 37 3.3 Illumination Survey 48 3.4 Ambient Noise Survey 54 3.5 Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Survey 64 3.6 Emergency Equipment.survey 67 3.7 Maintainability Survey 72 3.8 Communications Survey 77 3.9 Annunciator Survey 91 3.10 Controls Survey 108 3.11 Displays Survey 130 3.12 Labels and Location Aids Survey 149 3.13 Conventions Survey 165 3.14 Computer System Survey 171 ii
- TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued}
4.0 SYSTEM FUNCTIONS REVIEW AND TASK ANALYSIS 203 AND VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION 4.1 System Functions Review and Task Analysis 203 4.2 Verification of Component_ Availability and Suitability 207 4.3 Validation of Control Room Functions 216 5.0 . ASSESSMENT OF HEDs 232 5.1 Introduction to Assessment 232 5.2 The Assessment Process 233 5.3 HED Category/Priority 237 APPENDIX A - OPERATOR QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORMS A-1 APPENDIX B - SFRTA EXAMPLE: DETERMINATION OF ACTION AND B-1 INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX C - SCENARIOS FOR VALIDATION WALK-THROUGHS C-1 APPENDIX D - HED REPORTS D-1
- iii
I
- Tables LIST OF TABLES Page 2-1 NUMBER OF INTERVIEW PHEDs 17 2-2
SUMMARY
OF DOCUMENTATION REVIEW 22 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS AND.HEDs GENERATED 27 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 39 3-3 ILLUMINATION SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 52 3-4A NOISE SURVEY RECORD (Unit 1) 57 3-4B NOISE SURVEY RECORD (Unit 2) 60 3-4c AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 63 3-5 HVAC SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 66 3-6 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs 69 GENERATED 3-7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED_- 74 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 79 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED - 94 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 111 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 133 3-12 LABELS SURVEY .FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 152 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 167 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 174 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE. CAP ABILITIES 210 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS 220 5-1 POTENTIAL FOR ERROR ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 236 5-2 CONSEQUENCE OF ERROR ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 238
- iv
I - LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1-1 THE TASK FLOW/RELATIONSHIPS OF THE CR REVIEW 3 1-2 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PROCESS 9 1-3 HED REPORT PAGE 1 AND PAGE 2 10 1-4 VIRGINIA POWER CRDR PROJECT TEAM 13 3-3A UNIT 1 - ILLUMINATION MEASUREMENTS 50 3-3B UNIT 2 - ILLUMINATION MEASUREMENTS 51 3-4A UNIT 1 - NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS 56 3-4B UNIT 2 - NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS 59 4-1 SAMPLE AIRD FORM 205 4-2 SAMPLE AIRS FORM 206 4-3A INSTRUCTIONS FOR VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM 217 FUNCTIONS 4-3B VALIDATION OF CR FUNCTIONS DATA FORM 218 -
- 5-1 HED PRIORITY RECORD 233
- V
- LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS _AND ACRONYMS The following abbreviations and acronyms are used in this report:
Acronym Definition AIRDS Action-Information Requirements Details AIRS .Action-Information Requirements Summary ALB Annunciator Light Box APDMS Axial Power Distribution Monitoring System ATWS Anticipated Transient Without Scram BIT Boron Injection Tank CPT Complete (No further action needs to be taken) CR. Control Room CRDR Control Room Design Review CRT Cathode Ray Tube eves Chemical Volume Control System EOP Emergency Operating Procedure EP Emergency Procedure ERC Emergency Response Capability ERG Emergency Response Guidelines FRP Function Restoration Procedure GPM Gallons Per Minute
- HED Human Engineering Discrepancy HEDAT Human Engineering Discrepancy Assessment Team HF Human Factors HP Health/Physics
- HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
- vi
Acronym Definition I&C Instrumentation and Control IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers LER Licensee Event Report LOCA Loss-of-Coolant Accident MPS Malfunction Primary System NOD Nuclear Operations Department NRC Nucle*ar Regulatory Commission NSSS Nuclear Steam Supply System NUREG Nuclear Regulatory Guide para Paragraph PHED Preliminary Human Engineering Discrepancy P&ID Piping & Instrumentation Diagram
- PS RCP RCS Primary System Reactor Coolant Pump Reactor Coolant System RVLIS Reactor Vessel Liquid Inventory System Rx Reactor RWST Refueling Water Storage Tank SFRTA Systems Functions Review and Task Analysis SGTR Steam Generator Tube Rupture SI Safety Injection SPDS Safety Parameters Display System SRO Senior Reactor Operator
- vii
Acronym
- Definition VHF Very High Frequency V&V Verification of Task Performance Capability and Validation of CR Functions WOG-ERG Westinghouse Owners' Group Emergency Response Guidelines
./
viii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared in response to NUREG-0737 item 1.D.1 and details the means by which the Review and Assessment Phase of a Control Room Design Review (CRDR) was conducted for the Surry Power Station, owned and operated by the Virginia Electric and Power Company. Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 share a common control room. The review and assessment process was conducted using NUREG-0700, NUREG-0801, and NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 as guidance. 1.1 CRDR Program Structure The CRDR is being conducted in three phases as follows: 1.1.1 Phase I - Project Planning The initial phase in this review involved preparation of a Control Room Design Review (CRDR) Program Plan Which was submitted to the NRC .on March 1, 1984. The Pr_ogram Plan was based on guidance contained in NUREGs-0700, 0801, and 07*37
- Supplement 1 (paragraph 5.2.a). The Program Plan addressed the following topics:
1. 2. 3. Review plan Management and staffing Documentation and document control
- 4. Review procedures
- 5. Assessment
- 6. Reporting
- 7. Implementation.
The organ"ization arid scheduling reflected in the Program Plan were selected to coincide with other Virginia Electric and Power Company Emergency Response Capabilities (ERC) initiatives (e.g., RGl. 97, EOP upgrade, SPDS implementation, etc.). Unless otherwise indicated, the review process as described in this summary report follows the approach presented in the Program Plan. 1.1.2 Phase II-* Review and Assessment The second phase of the CRDR involved collection, reduction and analysis of data
- pertaining to the adequacy of the CR design from a human factors perspective, and 1
assessment of any human engineering discrepancies (HEDs) identified during this process *
- The assessment procedure included:
1. 2. A determination of the error potential, consequence of error and safety importance of each HED. Identification of potential HED resolutions.
- 3. Assurance that no additional* HEDs are introduced as a result of these resolutions.
The present report represents the conclusion of Phase II for Surry Power Station. The report describes the methods, results and implications of the Surry CRDR. 1.1.3 Phase m - Implementation The final phase in the CRDR will be to implement the corrective actions for safety-significant HEDs. Following implementation, the HEDs will be re-reviewed to ensure that the corrective actions were . complete and adequate and that no new HEDs have been introduced. If, for some reason, a safety-significant HED cannot be fully corrected, the cause and consequence of this condition will be documented. 1.2 Review and Assessment
- Figure 1-i shows, in general, the task flow for the review and assessment phase of the Control Room Design Review. A brief discussion of the activities conducted in the review follows this figure. The Control Room Design Review was conducted using the NUREG-0700 guidelines. Planning, staffing, technical approach, and prioritization were conducted in accordance with the guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700.
The present Control Room Design Review report closely fallows the outline recommended in Section 5.2 of NUREG-07-00. Specifically, this final report discusses:
- The Control Room Design Review phases
- The technical activities review of operating experience assembly of control room documentation conduct of control room surveys system/function/task analysis verification of task performance capability validation of control room functions
- Method of assessment of discrepancies
- Method of identification and selection of enhancement and design solutions
- 2
VERIFY REVIEW SYSTEM TASK
. OPERATING FUNCTIONS AND TASK PERFOR-EXPERIENCE MANCE ANALYSIS CAPABILITY DEVELOP FINAL REPORT ANALYZE AND DEVELOP ASSESS SELECT PROGRAM DISCRE- POTENTIAL PLAN PANCIES CORRECTIVE ACTION DEVELOP CORRECTIVE ASSEMBLE VALIDATE ACTION CONDUCT CONTROL CONTROL SCHEDULE CONTROL ROOM ROOM ROOM DOCUMEN- SURVEYS FUNCTIONS TATION FIGURE 1-1 THE TASK FLOW/RELATIONSHIPS OF THE CR REVIEW
- o A review of the results of human engineering discrepancy assessment
- The selected enhancement and design solutions will be organized into the following groups:
operating experience review findings (documentation, etc.) survey findings (annunciator, communications, etc.) task. analysis findings (panel/workspace) and verification of human factors engineering suitability and validation of functions findings (control room traffic, workload distribution, and man/machine functional allocations)
- o Improvements to be made enhancements/justification/extent of correction
- design alternative/justification/extent of correction
.o Scope and scheduling of additional human engineering activities.
1.3 Review Procedures This section presents, in general terms, the review procedures employed. Detailed descriptions of the procedures employed and results of each activity a_re presented in Sections 2.0 - 4.0. Data collection, analysis and documentation were subdivided into five subtasks as follows: o Review of Operating Experience
- o o
o o Assembly of Control Room Documentation Control Room Surveys System Functions Review and Task Analysis (SFR TA) Verification of Task Performance Capability and Validation of Con:-* trol Room Functions. 1.3.1 Review of Operating Experience This task was composed of two subtasks: 1) conduct of operator questionnaires and interviews, and 2) review of plant operational experience through Licensee Event Reports, Deviation Reports, and Engineering Work Requests. This review task was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of NUREG-0700. 1.3.2 Assembly of Control Room Documentation In this task, a control room data base was established to support subsequent evaluation. A library was established with control room related documentation (technical specifications, drawings, etc.), control room components were photo-documented, and a half-scale photo mosaic mockup was constructed. The library and photo-documentation
- were located to support the effort. In addition to the library and photographic 4
documentation, a control room inventory of components was developed, id*entifying *for each component its location, system relationships, functions, and characteristics. Included in the inventory was all the information necessary to verify the availability of instruments required to meet the operator information and action needs identified in the SFR TA (see Sections 1.3.:i and 1.3.5). 1.3.3 Control Room Surveys Much of the detailed assessment of the control room was conducted through checklist surveys. Surveys required the collection of data using preconstructed checklists and interview forms, and the taking of direct measurements of control room parameters such as noise levels, light levels, etc. The survey criteria ar~ presented in the appropriate* survey sections. (3.1 - 3.14}. For
. ~ .
each survey, in Sections 3.1 - 3.1.4 a summary of Human Engineering Discrepancies is included. The surveys conducted were:
- Workspace - checklist evaluation of various control room character-istics, such as layout and arrangement
- of CR furnishirigs, CR accessibility, etc.
- Anthropometrics - analysis of reach and visual access to control room components given physical configuration of boards, panels, layout, etc. The dat.a were subsequently compared to checklist item requirements.
- Illumination - measurements were taken under various conditions (e.g., normal and emergency lighting) and compared to individual NUREG-0700 items. .
- Noise - direct measurements of noise levels were taken and com-pared to individual checklists items.
- Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HV AC) - evaluation by direct measurement of HV AC parameters and comparison to NUREG-0700 criteria.
- Emergency Equipment - data were collected by walk-throughs, use of emergency garments, and checklist application.
- Maintainability - checklist and questionnaire data. concerning operator-maintained components (trend recorders, bulbs, etc.).
- Communications - checklist evaluation of communications systems.
- Annunciators - checklist evaluation of annunciator systems; direct measurement of annunciator fonts, signal intensities, etc.
- Controls - checklist evaluation of controls.
- Displays - checklist evaluation of displays.
- Labels and location aids~ checklist evaluation of labels and location aids .
5
- o Design Conventions - evaluations by survey for the conventions listed below. The data were subsequently compared to NUREG-0700 guidelines.
coding methods (color, shape, patteri::i, etc.) standardization of abbreviations and acronyms
,.. consistency of control use consistency of display movement or indication o Computers - checklist evaluation of computer systems.
/
1.3.4 System Functions Review and Task Analysis (SFRTA) System functions and tasks were identifi~d and evaluated in this task. A four-step procedure was employed: o Identification of systems and subsystems by review of plant documen-tation and NSSS. operating guidelines, and discussions with plant operations staff o Identification of event sequences to undergo Task Analysis. These were identified using: NUREGs-0737, -0660, and -0700 Westinghouse Owners' Group Emergency Response Guidelines, Revision 1 (WOG-EllGs, Rev. 1)
- o Identification of system/subsystem functions through document review and operator comment o
- Identification and analysis of control room operational tasks.
Task Analysis data served as an input to the verification of task performance capability and validation of control room functions (~ee paragraph 1.3.5). The result/product of this task was the specification of operator action and information requirements for all tasks performed (which provide emergency response capabilities) under emergency conditions. 1.3.5 Verification of Task Performance Capability and Validation of CR Functions (V&::V) This evaluation task involved .three subtasks: 1) verification of instrument/control availability, 2) verification of human engineering suitability, and 3) validation of CR functions. The first, verification of availability, was conducted using the Task Analysis and control room inventory. In general, tasks associated with control room functions were examined in terms of appropriate instrumentation in the control room (i.e., task equipment demands vs. actual equipment present in the control room).
- When specified information or control requirements were not met, HED reports were prepared, including a description of the problem and an estimate of the potential effect on operator perform-
- ance.
6
Estimations of nonprocedurally-bound operations (e.g., boration, etc.) were gene-
- rated via operator responses during the V&V process. Also task sequences required in selected event sequences were estimated as to frequency of occurrence in the event sequences. Comparing both frequency* and requirements data to the inventory, identifica-
. tion was made of: 1) the *absence (in the control room) of task-required information or control, 2) the estimated frequency with which the information or control is required, and
- 3) the conditions (events, procedures, etc.) under which the information or control is
*required.
The second subtask, verification of human engineering suitability, involved using identified functional groups, and checklists to evaluate human engineering suitability in terms of sequence of component" use, control/display proximity, and so forth. NUREG-0700 guidelines served as the principal source document for evaluation criteria. The final subtask, validation of CR functions, involved analysis of workload and distribution of workload for operators performing specific task and event sequences. Also, overall control room traffic was analyzed. Where potential problems in operator movement or workload were identified, walk-throughs were conducted at the Surry simulator.
- 1.4 Documentation and Document Control
- Three types of documentation were addressed: 1) reference . documentation,
- 2) process and Human Engineering Discrepancy documentation, and 3) Control Room Design Review output findings and reports.
1.4.1 Reference Documentation A program library was established with reference documents to support the detailed Control Room Design Rev~ew tasks. It contains:
- Licensee Event Reports
- Deviation Reports
- Engineering Work Requests
- Technical specifications and system descriptions
- Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams
- Floor plans
- Instrument lists
- Panel drawings and photographs
- Software descriptions 7
NSSS operating guidelines (Rev. 1 WOG-ERGs) Upgraded emergency operating procedures (draft Rev. 1) Samples of computer printouts Various Nuclear Regulatory Commission and industry documents bearing on control room design (i.e., NUREGs-0700 and -0660, IEEE specifications and standards, human factors engineering texts, etc.). As required, this documentation was referenced to support specific tasks within the control room evaluations. 1.4.2 Process Documentation Data collection and reduction methods were documented for reporting purposes. The general flow of information management is presented in Figure 1-2. Task plans served as the basic process documentation. All data collected during the review were maintained in individual task folders in the central project files at Essex. The completed task plans will be turned over to the Virginia Electric and Power Company. 1.4.3 Guideline Human Engineering Discrepancy Documentation Data files for each Human Engineering Discrepancy were generated. For each task requiring a report, file space was reserved for that report. The following information was recorded for each Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED):
- NUREG-0700 guideline number
- Human engineering discrepancy problem description
- Human engineering discrepancy-assessment
- Human Engineering Discrepancy locations (components which are discrepant from the NUREG-0700 guidelines)
- Action to be taken on the Human Engineering Discrepancy.
Figure 1-3 presents the Human Engineering Discrepancy form used to document and report findings. All HEDs were entered into and are maintained within an electronic data base management system. The electronic data base management system will be used for tracking purposes to ensure satisfactory completion of Phase III, Implementation of Corrective Actions
- 8
- DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 1 COLLECT DATA DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 2 COLLECT DATA DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE N COLLECT DATA IDENTIFY HEDs IDENTIFY HEDs * * * * * * *
- IDENTIFY HEDs DOCUMENT DOCUMENT * * * * * * *
- l>OCUMENT FILE FILE * * * * * * *
- FILE ASSESS AND PRIORITIZE HEDs UPDATE FILES IDENTIFY RESOLUTION UPDATE FILES DEVELOP SCHEDULES/
RESOLUTIONS REPORT FIGURE 1*2 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PROCESS
- 9
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY (HED) REPORT
- PLANT/UNIT ORIGINATOR: HED NO.: - - - - - - -
VALIDATED BY: - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATE: - - - - - - - -
&) HED TITLE: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
b) ITEMS INVOLVED: c) PROBLEM DESCRIPTION AND 0700 PARA. NUMBER: d) DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: e) SPECIFIC HUMAN ERROR(s): FIGURE 1-3 HED REPORT PAGE 1 10
HED REPORT (CONTINUED) HED NO: _ _ _ __ PLANT/UNIT f) SUGGESTED BACKFIT: g) REVIEW AND DISPOSITION: FIGURE 1*3 (CONTINUED) HED REPORT PAGE 2
- 11
1.5 Management and Staff~ Project management and staffing were fully described in the CRDR program plan. As described in the program plan, the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR team was established to include representatives from a1i disciplines necessary to ensure optimum performance of the review team. As such, engineering, operations, human factors, and other needed disciplines were included on the team. The CRDR team was composed of up to 27 members, lOponstituting the dedicated core team. The core group was supplemented on an as-required basis by the remaining individuals. The structure of the CRDR team is shown in Figure 1-4. The structure of the team has not changed since the program plan was written. However, in mid-1985 the composition of the team did change somewhat. Most notably, Mr. J. S. Fisher and Mr. R. F. Anderson are now, respectively, the Site Operations Coordinators for Surry and North Anna Power Stations. The are also responsible for EOP generation at their respective stations. Both Mr. Fisher and Mr. Anderson hold SRO licenses and collectively represent over 30 years of nuclear operations experience. In addition, Mr. T.. J. Voss replaced Mr. David Eike as the Lead Human Factors Specialist for North Anna Power Station. Previously Mr. Voss had been involved in the data collection activities for the project,_ and he has more than 5 years of experience in the application of human factors engineering to the nuclear power industry* An in-progress audit of the Surry CRDR was held in November 1984. Concerning project staffing, the NRC audit team recommended that Virginia Electric and Power Company personnel be more directly involved in the conduct qf the control room survey. As such, a sizable portion of the CR survey activities were conducted not only with the . half-scale photo-mosaic, but also in the Surry control room with the Surry Site Operations Coordinator in attendance. During on-site activities, which involved all of the 14 CR survey areas (see Section 1.3.3), on-shift operations personnel were frequently involved in
- explaining the manner in which systems and components function as well as responding to other issues and questions concerning checklist items.
1.6 Assessment and Disposition of HEDs The final activity in the review process was the assessment and recommended disposition of human engineering discrepancies. This activity was conducted in two parts. First, each HED was assessed for its potential to induce operator errors, by considering the potential impact on human performance. Second, the effect of the error, especially in terms of plant safety, was estimated by determining which systems and/or plant functions
- would be affected. Once this assessment was completed, the recommended HED 12
PROJECT ENGINEER T.L. GERMON I
- LEAD DISCIPLINE ENGINEER H.W. BURRUSS
'NOD CORPORATE PROJECT COORDINATOR I
1--------------..L---------------------T----- HF PROJECT MANAGER T.A. HARDING H.P. VAN COTT I I
- SITE
- SITE 'NORTH ANNA
- SURRY OPERATIONS OPERATORS LEAD HUMAN LEAD HUMAN COORDINATOR COORDINATOR FACTORS FACTORS NORTH ANNA SURRY SPECIALIST SPECIALIST R.F.ANDERSON J.S. FISHER T.J. VOSS W.T. TALLEY I
I I I I I I I NORTH ANNA SURRY TRAINING "l&C TRAINING HUMAN DDC HUMAN OPERATIONS ENGINEERING A&E OPERATIONS FACTORS FACTORS G.E. PEDERSON L.E. GARDNER SPECIALISTS H.E. ENGEL SPECIALISTS B.F. HILL D.L. PILSITZ D.L. PILSITZ N.S. KFOURY N.S. KFOURY
!D!coRE TEAM MEMBERS
- MEMBER OF HEDAT FIGURE 1*4 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER CRDR PROJECT TEAM
disposition was determined. Disposition included enhancements, design changes, and/or more detailed studies to determine specific design solutions. A detailed description of the HED assessment process is presented in Section 5.0 of this report.
- 1. 7 Implementation Phase III of the CRDR will implement the corrective actions for HEDs. Virginia Electric and Power Company will give a schedule for the implementation of corrective actions in a separate document .
14
2.0 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW The operating experience review consisted of two tasks: . 1) conduct of operator questionnaires and interviews, and 2) review of documents related to plant operating experience. The methodology and results of these tasks are described in the following sections. 2.1 Operator Questionnaires and Interviews Questionnaires and interviews were conducted in accordance with NUREG-0700 as part of the Control Room Design Review (CRDR) performed at Surry Power Station. The objective was to solicit from control room operating personnel comments and observations concerning selected aspects of the design and operation of the Surry control room. The methodology and results of the questionnaires and interviews are described in the fallowing sections. 2.Ll Methodology Operator questionnaires and interviews are conducted as part of the operating
. experience review for a CRDR to identify and record any human engineering discrep-.
ancies (HEDs) that have been encountered during the operation of the plant. NUREG-
. 0700 recommends that a range of operations personnel be interviewed, including opera-tions managers, shift supervisors, shift technical advisors, senior reactor operators, reactor operators, and auxiliary operators.
The approach recommended ~y NUREG-0700 follows the general format of the critical incident technique in which the respondent is asked to describe specific incidents that demonstrate positive or negative aspects of the design and/or operation of the control room. This approach allows the interviewer to focus on critical success, failure and near-miss situations encountered in actual plant operation. These situations are then analyzed, from a human engineering perspective, to determine any causal or contributing factors related to the design and/or operation of the control room. In the present study, the operator questionnaires and interviews were part of an integrated CRDR process that employs four separate data collection techniques: observa-tion,* measurement, document review and operator questionnaires/interviews. Prior to initiation of the CRDR, each guideline in Chapter 6 of NUREG-0700 was systematically 15
reviewed to determine the most appropriate data collection technique(s).. Those guide-lines selected for inclusion in the operator questionnaire and interview forms
- were translated into the appropriate format and entered into the forms.
Questionnaires were . administered to the operations personnel at Surry Power Station. In addition, 53 interviews were conducted on an individual basis to preclude consensual bias and to maximize the interaction between. interviewer and respondent. Fourteen areas of concern were included in the questionnaire and interview forms. These included the fallowing: (1) Controls (8) Ambient illumination (2) Displays (9) Communications (3) Verification of task perform- (10) Emergency equipment ance (11) Workspace (4) Labels and location aids (12) Computer system (5) Annunciators (13) Anthropometrics (6) Ambient noise (14) HVAC. (7) Maintainability *
- Example questionnaire and interview forms are contained in Appendix A.
2.1.2 Questionnaire and Interview Results 2.1.2.1 Operator Demography - Twenty-five reactor operators, 13 shift supervisors and 15 others were interviewed at the Surry Power Station. The mean number of years of commercial operating experience at Surry is 3.8. Approximately .40% of the operators have also had experience in the U.S. Navy nuclear program. 2.1.2.2 Analysis of .Data and Findings - The operator responses for individual items* were tabulated on summary sheets. Similar operator responses to related items were combined, allowing potential problems to be considered in a more integrated fashion. However, even singular operator responses were treated as potential problems, so that no s.erious problem would be omitted from consideration. Potential problem areas identified by operators were documented as Preliminary Human Engineering Discrepancies (PHEDs) on HED forms (Fi&"ure 1-3). The PHEDs later underwent the formal HED review process as described in Section 5.0. The results of the questionnaires and interviews conducted at Surry revealed 116 PHEDs~ Numbers for the individual HEDs*are given by task plan in the tables contained in 16
- Section 3.0. In the tables th.ese HEDs have an "I" (for interview) in the data collection
- method column. Individual HED descriptions are contained in Appendix D, "HED Reports." The number of HEDs and the major problems by task plan area are given below.
(Table 2-1). TABLE 2...;.1 NUMBER OF INTERVIEW PHEDs TASK PLAN AREA # PHEDs # QUESTIONS
- 1. Controls 13 13
- 2. Displays 18 13
- 3. Verification of Task Performance 12 27
- 4. Labels and Location Aids 6 9 5~ Annunciators 11 8
- 6. Ambient Noise 3 5
- 7. Maintainability 3 8
- 8. Ambient Illumination 2 4
- 11 9*
10. 12. Communications Emergency Equipment Workspace Computer System 5 6 16 13 7 8 10 12
- 13. Anthropometrics 5 6
- 14. Heating Ventilation and AC 2 4
- 15. Conventions 1 _o 116 134 Concerning major problems in the above areas, operators reported that:
Controls
- a. Some controls which must be operated simultaneously are too close together.
- b. Some controls activating a critical function do not have a moveable cover or guard.
- c. Unused controls are still present on the board.
- d*
e. Controls are duplicated unnecessarily on the control board. There is no feedback provided indicating that pushbutton controls have been activated. 17
Displays
- a. System status is inferred by indicator lights. being off rather than ilium inated.
- b. Permissive status light indications are inconsistent across systems in the control room.
- c. Control status light indication meaning is inconsistent.
- d. Scale ranges on some meters are too wide.
- e. *scale ranges on some fueters are too narrow for maximum displayed values.
- f. Pointer visibility is poor on scales.
- g. Some recorders which operators are required to use are not located in the primary operating area.
- h. All visual displays and indications necessary to meet task requirements are not present in the control room.
i *. Many recorder windows are dirty, paint sprayed, or scratched. Verification of Task Performance
- a. All instrumentation and equipment needed to meet task requirements and bring the plant to a safe shutdown in normal, abnormal, and emergency conditions is not present in the control room .
- b.
c. d. e. Status of some shared equipment is not displayed in both units. Unnecessary information is displayed in the control room. Some indicators are not labeled to reflect demand or actual status. Displays are difficult to use because they display normal random variations in equipment performance.
- f. Some displays which must be compared have incompatible scales.
Labels and Location Aids
- a. Labelling for some components is incorrect, incomplete, or missing.
- b. Annunciator tile legends are wordy and ambiguous.
- c. Controls associated with out-of-service equipment are not tagged out in the control room.
Annunciators
- a. There is a lack of prioritization of incoming alarms in the control room.
- b. . illuminated annunciator tiles indicate normal conditions.
- c. There is no audible alarm cleared signal for annunciator systems *
- 18
- Ambient Noise a.
b. The ambient noise level is too high in the control room. Construction and maintenance activities are not well regulated during the day shift. Maintainability
- a. The supply of expendable and spare parts is inadequate in the control room.
- b. Tools for replacing expendables are unavailable in the control room.
Ambient illumination
- a. Significant glare has been reported in the control room.
- b. Control room operations need to be evaluated under emergency operat-ing conditions.
Communications
- a. The conventional powered and sound-powered telephone systems are inadequate.
- b. The fixed base VHF and Gaitronics Systems are inadequate.
- Emergency Equipment
- a. The emergency equipment is not properly inventoried or restocked.
- b. Operators have had no practice in donning or using protective equipment while performing control room duties.
- c. Communications problems have been reported while wearing protective equipment.
Workspace
- a. Full view of the panels is not possible when sitting at desks.
- b. The control room is too crowded during shift change, start-up, and transients.
- c. Storage for plant operating procedures is inadequate.
- d. Personal storage facilities are inadequate.
- e. The carpeting lacks padding; this causes fatigue.
Computer System
- a. Computer responses to operator's inputs are too slow.
- b. Changes to the computer system have not been documented *
- c. Data point indices are inadequate for operator use.
19
- d*
e. f. g. Printer speed is too slow, and buffer storage is inadequate. Printer paper take-up spools are missing from the control room. Operator computer interface is inadequate. Alarm messages on printouts are not readily distinguishable from other messages. Anthropometrics
- a. Controls are too high and too low on panels.
- b. . Controls are inconveniently located relative to their associated displays.
- c. Displays are located too low and too high on panels.
Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
- a. There are cold spots in the control room.
- b. Control room temperature is too cold in winter.
Conventions
- a. ALB tile legends are inconsistent with other labelling in the control room ..
20
2.2 Documentation Review This section summarizes the results of the documentation review performed to identify documented conditions in the Surry Control Room that may cause human performance problems. This review consisted of two elements as follows:
- 1. Review the Surry Power Station Licensee Event Reports (LERs) with potential HED implications
- 2. Review of Shutdown and Trip Reports, Station Deviation Reports and Engineering Work Requests with potential HED implications.
The methodology and results of these reviews are described briefly in the following paragraphs. 2.2.1 Methodology The list of Surry Power Station Licensee Event Reports (LERs) was reviewed, and those which involved potential HED implications were selected for further review. These reports were then evaluated to determine the events leading to the problem and the nature of the problem, and to identify potential HEDs associated with the problem. Similarly, lists of Surry Shutdown and Trip Reports, Station Deviation Documents and Engineering Work Requests were reviewed, and those with potential HED implications were selected for further review. These documents were also evaluated to determine the events leading to the problems and the nature of the problems, and to identify potential HEDs associated with the problem. Any human engineering discrepancies identified during the review were documented on HED report forms for later ~onsideration by the HED Assessment Team. 2.2.2 Results Table 2-2 provides a summary of the documentation review results. Each Surry Power Station document (LER, etc.) with potential HED implications is listed along with the associated Preliminary HED. In all, the documentation review yielded 13 PHEDs. The PHEDs were later subjected to the formal review process described in Section 5.0. Individual HED report descriptions are contained in Appendix D* 21
TABLE 2-2
SUMMARY
OF DOCUMENTATION REVIEW DOCUMENT POTENTIAL HED HED NUMBER LER-78-002/031-0 Exceeded interval on APDMS 22A0-5003 transient surveillance LER-78-030/031-0 Last step of APDMS transient 22A0-5004 surveillance not performed LER-78-036/032-0 Compensatory surveillance on 22A0-5005 RCP "C" stator and bearing temp. not performed hourly LER-081-001/03L-O Valve inadvertently closed 22A0-1703 blocking boric acid flow path LER-082-031/03L-O "B" Safety Injection Accumulator 22A0-1704 was overfilled LER-081-014/03L-O Alarm setpoint was miscalculated 22A0-2919 and set too high by H.P. technician LER-081-057 /031-0 Circuit breakers for BIT Inlet and 22A0-3035 LER-S1-048/03L-O Outlet opened in error LER-81-039/031-0 Operator opened "A" accumulator
- 22A0"'"3034 drain valve rather than fill .valve LER-78-013/1031-0 Reactor brought critical below 22A0-5002 insertion limits during startup LER-82-044/031-0 RWST temperature allowed to go 22A0-5006
- above tech spec. limits LER.:.81-076/03L-O Diesel Fire Pump Fuel Oil Tank 21A0-5009 below minimum allowable level LER-81-053/031-0 Containment Isolation Valve left 21A0-1701 open locally LER-81-038/031-0 Circuit breakers for valves 21A0-1702 LER-81-047 /03L-O . erroneously open locally
- 22
3.0 CONTROL ROOM SURVEY The methodology used to conduct the CR surveys at Surry Power Station incorpo-rated a mix of traditional procedures and methods tailored to the specific requirements of the plant. The four basic. methods employed within each survey were measurements, observations, questionnaires/interviews, and documentation reviews. Within each of these methods, specific procedures were used to ensure a comprehensive data collection, data reduction, and analysis process. The procedures were organized into a set of standardized task plans. The *survey process was structured into a number of separate tasks, each task involving a specific set of related control room design features. For example, environ-mental factors were organized into lighting, noise, HV AC, and workspace ~urveys. This structural approach, coupled with the standardized task plans, allowed for maximum flexibility during data collection, data reduction, and analysis, and resulted in a standard, well-organized self-documenting process. All task plans followed the general format of:
- 1) 2)
3) 4) Introduction (including the objectives} Review Team Selection and Responsibilities Criteria (from NUREG-0700, Section 6.0) Procedures
- 5) Equipment and Facility Requirements
- 6) Inputs and Data Forms
- 7) Outputs and Results
- 8) Figures and Tables
- 9) Procedure Exceptions
- 10) Appendices (as required).
In addition to this general format, the control room survey task plans incorporated a standardized set of appendices that ensured a consistent well-documented process for data collection, analyses, assessment, implementation and audits. The appendix structure employed was: Appendix A (Criteria) - This is a compendium of all 0700, Section 6.0 criteria in 0700 paragraph number order that is relevant to that task plan. It was used to summarize the final results . 23
- Appendix B (Data Forms) -
following: Bl Measurements Data This appendix is further divided into the Bl.1 Linear Measurements (scalar, force, torque, dimensional, air volume, temperature, humidity) Bl.2 Sound Measurements (noise audi_tory signals, communi-cations systems auditory response characteristics) Bl.3 Light Measur.ements (illumination levels, luminance characteristics, contrast ratios) Bl.4 through Bl.n Others (as required) B2 Questionnaires and Interviews B2.1 Operations B2.2 Engineering B2.3 Instrumentation and Calibration B2.4 Management and Administration B2.5 through B2.n Others (as required) B3 Observation Checklists B4 Documentation Review Checklists BS Analysis Aids for Bl - Measurements B5.1 Analysis Aids for Bl.1
- B5.2 . Analysis Aids for Bl.2 B5.3 Analysis Aids for Bl.3 B5.4 through B5.n Analysis Aids for Bl.4 through Bl.n (as required)
B6 Analysis Aids for B2 - Questionnaires/Interviews B7 Analysis Aids for B3...: Observation Checklists BB Analysis Aids for B4 - Documentation Review Checklists B9 Additional forms, as required. Prior to conducting the surveys, Appendices B2 {Questionnaires and Interviews) from the various task plans were assembled and used to conduct operator interviews (see Section 2.1 of this report). The results of the interviews were used to direct the focus of the survey effort. An overview of the methods and findings of the CR surveys are presented in the following sections. Appendix C: Criteria Matrix Appendix D: Task Plan Critique
.24
3.1 Workspace Survey
- This section documents the results of the workspace survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan.
3.1.1 Objectives The objectives of the workspace survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which the workspace layout in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify and document any features of the workspace design that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.1.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the workspace design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evalua,ted include:
- Furniture and equipment layout
- Document organization and storage
- Supervisor access
** Nonessential personnel access
- Procedure availability at consoles
- Desk dimensions
- Chair design
- Unit integration and interference
- Personal storage
- Ambience and comfort.
3~1.3 Criteria. The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.1.3a through g; 6.l.14a through e; 6.1.1.6a and b; _6.1.1. 7; 6.1.2.6; 6.1.2. 7a through d; 6.1.2.Sa through g; 6.1.3.la and b; 6.1.5.6a and b; and 6.1.5. 7a through c. The detailed definitions for each criterion .are presented in Table 3-1 *
- 25
3.1.4 Method 3.1.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data collected during the operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problems with CR workspace.
- b. Data were collected through direct observation of the control room workspace, using the checklist contained in the workspace task plan. As necessary, operators on shift at the time of the survey were queried concerning the suitability of the control room workspace.
3.1.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:
- a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the items involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 para-graph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel. * *
- c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the workspace task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
- 3.1.5 Findings The findings of the workspace survey are presented in Table 3-1 "Workspace Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 56 criteria were applied to the workspace design in the Surry control room. Of these, 2 (496) were not applicable, 31 (5596) were in compliance, and 23 (4196) were not in compliance. A total of 27 HEDs were generated which document all of the 23 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs were related to the viewing of controls and displays from the operator's desk, the facilitation of communications and access to equipment by furniture and equipment layout, the storage of reference documents and procedures, the location of and communication with the shift supervisor's office, and the provision for and communication with restroom and eating facilities near the control room.
Table 3-1 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section 5.0 for an explanation of* assessment category). Note that the category "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED *
- 26
TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS~ HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 10
- GUIDELINE 6.1.1.3 FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
;0~/. ~ 7
~
~
~
~
~
~
II
~
~
~ ~
I ~
~
~
~
~
~
q;:
-~
~
I
- a. VIEWING - Desks and *consoles placed I NO 20A00101 CPT permit operators at those desks and 20A02101 Il-5 consoles full view of all control and 20001402 CPT display panels (including annunciator panels) in the primary operating area (see Exhibit 6.1-2).
- b. COMMUNICATIONS - Desk and con- I NO 20001403, CPT sole placement should facilitate voice communications from operators seated at those work stations to any point in the primary operating area.
C, OPERATOR ACCESS (1) Operator should be able to get to 0 NO 20001404 CPT
- any work station without having 20A00114 Il-6 to overcome obstacles such as 22001401 CPT tripping hazards, poorly positioned filing cabinets or storage racks, maintenance equipment, etc .
( 2) Operators should be able to posi- I NO 20000102 CPT tion themselves conveniently for *20B23001 CPT performing task actions at any 20000201 CPT work station. 20001404 CPT
- d. CIRCULATION PATTERNS (1) The control room arrangement I NO 23B01001 Il-6 should facilitate efficient unob-structed movement and communi-cation.
(2) The control room arrangement I YES should minimize interference between the members of the operational crew .
- 27
TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 10
- 6.1.1.3 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE . I cf
~
~~;
!:I .I
,;;;
~
~ ~I
~
/// ii Qi
~
I
- e. OPERATOR MANEUVERING SPACE - Between the back (operator's position) of desk/consoles and any surface or fixed object behind the operator, adequate space should be allowed for the operator to get into and
- out of a chair freely or to turn in the chair to view the equipment behind.
(1) A minimum separation of 36 M NO 22A00112 CPT inches from the back of any desk to any opposing surface is sug-gested as the minimum (see Exhibit 6.1-3). A greater separa-tion is preferable. (2) Lateral space for a seated M YES opera tor should be no less than 30 inches (see Exhibit 6.1-3). Greater latitude is preferable.
- f. EQUIPMENT:--TO-OPPOSING-SURF ACE DISTANCE - Enough space should be allowed so that personnel can perform all required tasks. The space should accommodate kneeling and bending, simultaneous work by more than one operator, and simultaneous perform-ance of operational and maintenance tasks as may be required. Recom-mended minimum separations are illus-trated in Exhibit 6.1-4.
(1) A minimum separation of 50 M NO 22A00113 CPT inches is recommended between a single row of equipment/panel and a wall or other opposing surface. (2) A minimum separation of 50 M YES inches is also recommended between two rows of facing
. equipment if both rows are worked by a single operator .
- 28
TABLE 3-l WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 10
- 6.1.1.3f. (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "
~
i!
~'iI~
!Ii
$ ~
I~
~s I . &
<.;
;;
~
~
I (3) A minimum separation of 8 feet is M YES recommended between opposing rows of equipment where more than one person must work simul-taneously on operational or main-tenance tasks and kneeling, bend-ing, or use of test equipment may be necessary.
- g. OPENINGS .....:... Panels should be laid out 0 NO 20A01003 CPT and maintained, and equipment enclos-ures designed, so .that there are no unguarded openings through which unwanted objects can be introduced.
6.1.1.4 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION AND STORAGE
- a. ACCESSIBILITY (1) All procedures and other docu- 0 NO 22A04001 III-9 ments that may be needed for 22A05003 CPT ready reference should be kept in 22A05004 CPT the control room. 22A05005 1-2 (2) Reference documents should be 0 NO 22A05003 CPT stored where they are easy to 22A05004 CPT locate and extract for use. They 22A05005 1-2 should not be locked up, stored in places too low or too high for large and small personnel to access easily, in cramped spaces, or where poor illu:n ina tion exists.
- b. LOCATION AIDS (1) Clearly visible title labels should 0 YES be provided to identify specific documents.
(2) Labels should distinguish docu- 0 YES
. men ts as much as possible .
29
TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS&. HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 10
- ~ l~lj. ,fa1/ I 11 .§ I .~ I *
---------.....:.GU:.:ID:.:E:;,;Lllll:.:E_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _+~*+--f--..,..,;.._..;;"'"'-,f-~.,.---if----..,..-----f 6.1.l.4b. (Cont'd)
/
(3) Putting many volumes in one 0 YES location creates a search problem, especially ff titles are similar. One means'of reducing search time would be to put operational documentation in one location and other documentation in a secondary location.
- c. CONVENIENCE OF USE (1) Documents should not be fixed in 0 YES racks; it should be possible to remove documents for use ..
(2) Documents should be bound so 0 YES that they can be opened fully and will remain open at the desired place w.ithout holding.
- d. PROTECTION - Documents should be 0 YES protected fro:n wear so that they do not become dog~ared, dirty, loose, torn, and difficult to read.
- e. DEDICATED SETS OF YES PROCEDURES - Sets of procedures should be separately stored for each unit in a multi\lnit control room.
6.1.1.6 SUPERVISOR ACCESS
- a. ACCESS - The shift supervisor's office 0 NO 20001404 CPT should be located so as to permit prompt physical access to the control room under all conditions, including control room isolation*. The preferred location is within the control room isolation boundary, with placement to permit good visual and voice contact.
with -the primary operational area .
- 30
TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 10
- 6.1.1.6 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
~
~
~
~I. /1/
~
C.
;::
!I:
~
~
I 4'
~
!I, i6 4l'
~
I
- b. COMMUNICATIONS -When the shift N/A N/A supervisor's office is not within the control room boundary, dedicated com-munications links between the primary opera ting area and the shift supervisor's office should be provided. (See Guide-line 6.2.1. 7) 6.1.1. 7 NON~ENTIAL PERSONNEL D NO 20000401 CPT ACCF.SS Provision should be made to limit the access and movement of nonessential but authorized personnel to prescribed areas within the con-trol room.
6.1.2.6 USE OF PROCEDURES AND OTHER D NO 20000103 III-9 REFERENCE MATERIALS AT CONSOLES 20000104 III-9 Provision should be made so that the proced 20000116 CPT ures manuals and other reference materials can be consulted easily while *task sequences are performed at the consoles. Exhibit 6.1-15 shows the poor practice of laying manuals down on the benchboard when no convenient place has been provided for them. Exhibit 6.1-16 shows a good solution adopted by several plants: a rolling bookcase is pro-vided for storing and using procedures manuals. 6.1.2.7 DESK DIMENSIONS
- a. WORKING SPACE - Desks should 0 YES provide enough clear working space for all materials required for task perform-ance.
- b. CHAIR POSITIONS - The desk should 0 YES allow for different chair positions as required, with adequate knee space.
';
31
TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 10 6.1.2. 7 (Cont'd) C, GUIDELINE OPERATOR COMFORT- The Iii/! 0
~
i l $/ /// , NO
,ff ~
$~
20000105
- CPT
~ ~
~
I relationships of working surface height and area, knee room, and chair height should allow operators to work com-rortably. Exhibit 6.1-17 illustrates an uncomfortable situation created by desk height and chair design.
- d. DIMENSIONS - The following desk dimensions are recommended and shown in Exhibit 6.1-18:
(1) For seated work only, 26 to 31 M YES inches above the floor (29 inches is a standard height). (2) For sit-stand desks, 36 to 38 NIA NIA inches above the floor. (3) Work surface area depth: 16 M YES inches minimum. (4) Work surface area width: 24 M YES inches* minimum if tasks involve reading and writing only; 30 inches minimum if other kinds of tasks are required. (5) Knee room height: A distance of M YES approximately 25 inches fro:TI the
- floor to the under-surface of the desk top should provide adequate clearance for 5th to 95th per-.
centile male and female adults at
- sit-down-only stations.
- (6) Knee room depth: 18 inches mini- M YES IT!Um, (7) Knee room width: 20 inches mini- M YES mum (greater width prefei:red).
- 32
TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 10
- ,.:__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.....:.G::.:.U'D=E~Ll*::E:.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
6.1.2.8 CHAIRS 1!,~~ I~,~ j/ ~'* /
.....::"'-1-/.......:,:.....,.I:.__~"'.:......:~:._.,./:,_.:ac.~r----Cf----1
- a. MOBILITY - Chairs should pivot so 0 YES that operators can readily adjust posi-tion. Mobile bases {casters) are recom-mended for chairs at sit-only stations.
- b. BACKRESTS - Chairs should support M YES at least the lower back curvature {lum-bosacral region). The recommended angle between the back and the seat is about 1000 for office tasks {such as keyboard tasks). A greater angle is preferred for reading and resting.
- c. ARMRESTS - Where personnel may o* YES remain seated for relatively long periods, chairs with armrests are pre-ferred .. Adjustable or retractable arm-rests may be necessary to allow the elbows to rest in a natural position and for compatibility with a particular desk/console *
- d. CUSHIONING - Seat and backrest should be cushioned with at least 1 inch of compressible material, enough so that some resilience remains when the chair is occupied.
M YES
- e. SEAT AREA - The thighs and the M YES backs of the knees should not be com 0 pressed so as to cause fatigue and cir-culation problems. The seat should be at least 17 inches wide. Seat depth should be 15-17 inches (see Exhibit 6.1-19).
- f. SEAT ADJUSTABILITY - For chairs at M YES sit-<lown stations, seat height should generally be adjustable from 15 to 18 inches (Exhibit 6.1-19). For chairs at sit-stand stations, seat height should be adjustable from 26 to 32 inches {Exhibit 6.1-20) .
33
TABLE 3-1. WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 10
- 6.1.2.8 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "
~
I! ~~/
~
I CJ
~
;!
~
.~~
I
~
la 7
~
~
~
*~
~
~
~
~
I
- g. FOOTRESTS .,- An adjustable footrest 0 YES or heel catch should be provided to support the feet at a level no more than 18 inches below the seat surface. If a footrest is part of the chair, a circular
- design is recommended, diameter 18
- inches. The footrest might be provided on the console base.
6.1.3.1 UNIT INTEGRATION AND INTER-FERENCE a .. EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT - 0 YES Equipment should be arranged with movement and communication patterns in mind, so that unit operations do not interfere with each other.
- b. SENIOR OPERATOR STATION - I NO 20001402 CPT Senior operators who supervise and assist operations of more than one unit need. to be stationed so that they can comm un ica te effectively with operators in each unit and have an unobstructed visual path to the control boards of each unit.
6.1.5.6 PERSONAL STORAGE
- a. . STORAGE LOCATIONS - .There should 0
- NO 20000106 CPT be a suitable, out-of-the-way but secure place in which control room personnel may keep their coats and other personal belongings.
- b. STORAGE SUITABILITY - If lockers I NO 20000106 CPT are provided, they should be large enough to h~ld the items that can reasonably be expected to go into them; 6.1.5.7 AMBIENCE AND COMFORT An effort should be made to create a 0 YES pleasant and comfortable work setting in view of the long hours and confining aspects of the control room operator's job .
34
TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS ac HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 10
- 6.1.5. 7 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
~
i!~a/~ I
~
~
o
~~
I
~
~ ~
;:r
~
;;
7 ~
~
fl. 7
- a. DECOR - Features to be considered include: '
(1) Color coordination. 0 YES (2) Use of color and lighting to 0 NO 20000001 Ill-8 create a cheerful atmosphere (without introducing glare and brightness to a degree that causes eye fatigue of an overly intense atmosphere). (3) Visual relief from arrays of 0 YES instrumentation. (4) Comfortable seating. 0 YES (5) Carpeting to lessen the fatigue of 0 NO 20000107 III-9 standing and walking. b* RESTROOM AND EATING FACILITIES
- (1)
(2) A restroom and kitchen or eating area should be provided within (pre fer ably) or near the control room isolation boundary. Since formal breaks are not 0 0 NO NO 20000108 20000108 CPT CPT scheduled in most control rooms, it is important that personnel have access to these facilities without delay. It is preferable that they be used only by control room personnel. (3) Provision should be made for 0 NO 20000108 CPT communication if facilities are 20000211 CPT out of voice contact, so that an operator taking a break can be contacted as necessary by person-nel in the control room. (See
-Guideline 6.2.1. 7.)
35
TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 10 of 10
- ~~~~I' * ! ~I$ ~1/ ~ iiI
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __:,GU:.;,ID::E:::,LIN::.:E~----------1-__;:~'-l--;__./--~.;__;~-./-_;;c."""'""'1~--*- - q ; : - - - - - { 6.1.5. 7 (Cont'd)
/
- c. REST AREA/LOUNGE - Consideration 0 NO 20000108 CPT should be given to providing a rest area (possibly in conjunction with \he eating area) conducive to relaxation' and revitalization, especially where shifts
. are long .
- 36
3.2 Anthropometric Survey
- This section documents the results of the anthropometric survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan.
3.2.1 Objectives The objectives of the anthropometric survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which all stand-up and sit-stand work stations in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify and document any features of the work stations that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.2.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the work station design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The anthropometric topics evaluated include:
- Stand-up console dimensions
- Sit-stand console dimensions
- Vertical panels
- Operator-display relationships.
- 3. 2.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.2.2a through g; 6.1.2.3a through h; 6.1.2.4a through c; 6.1.2.Sa and b; and 6. 7.2.3a through f.
The-detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-2. 3.2.4 Method 3.2.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data collected during operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problem areas in the anthropometric characteristics of the control room.
- b. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the anthropometric task plan.
- 37
- c.
d. Reach and visual envelopes recommended in NUREG-0700 were dem.ar-
-cated on the control boards, and visual observations were made of the relative locations of controls and displays. Controls and displays falling outside the recommended envelopes were noted and their engineering numbers recorded.
Where it was necessary to consider the operational characteristics of the component (e.g., Guideline 6.1.2.5.a(l)}, Surry operating procedures were reviewed and/or operations personnel were consulted. 3.2.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to th~ fallowing procedure:
- a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the displays or controls involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel. * *
- c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the anthropometric task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria .
- 3.2.5- Findings The findings of the anthropometric survey are presented in Table 3-2 "Anthro-pometry Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 45 criteria were applied to the displays in the Surry control room. Of these, 14 (31 %) were not applicable, 22 (49%) were in compliance, and 9 (20%) were not in compliance. A total of 19 HEDs were generated which document all of the 9 criteria that were not met. In general; those HEDs address controls and displays that are located too high or too low on the vertical panels, controls that are not located more than 3 inches away from the edge of the console, and controls that are located more than 25 inches from the front of the console .
. Table 3-2 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section 5,0 for an explanation of assessment category). Note that "CPT" means complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED
- 38
TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FIND.INGS ~ HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 9
- GUIDELINE 6.1.2.2 STAND-UP CONSOLE DIMENSIONS
~
t:
~
~~7
~
I C,l
~
!I:
~
~I
~ 4'
~
!!I>
~/ ~
C,l G 41~
~
'Ii'
~
~
I
- a. CONSOLE HEIGHT TO.SEE OVER - M NO 22A02083 1-2 Benchboard When it is necessary for a standing 22A02084 11-6 height is operator to see over the top,,,,console 22A02085 11-6 49", but height (with or without annunciator 22A02086 11-5 vision to panels) should not exceed 58 inches. 22A02087 1-2 lower vertical 22A02088 11-5 panel is blocked.
- b. CONTROL HEIGHT - (Exhibits 6.1-5 and 6.1-6)
(1) The highest control on a stand-up M YES console should be within the highest reach of the 5th percen-tile female without stretching or using a stool, ladder, etc. * (2) The lowest controls on a stand-up M YES console should be within the lowest reach of the 95th percen-tile male without bending or stooping .
- c. BENCHBOARD SLOPE - The bench-board slope, in conjunction with its depth, should result in all controls being within the reach radius of the 5th per-centile female,. as illustrated in Exhibit 6.1-6.
M NO 2ZA03036 CPT d! CONTROL DISTANCE FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE CONSOLE (1) Controls should be set back a M NO 22A03037 II-5 minimum of 3 inches from the front edge to protect against accidental activation. (2) No control should be more than 25 M NO 22A03036 CPT inches from the front edge of the console. This accommodates the - maximum reach of the 5th per-
. centile female adult as illustrated in Exhibit 6.1-6.
- 39
TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 o! 9
- ~
~
~
~ ~ ' ' /
ti' fat/.
~
~
~
~~
!!I +-_::CJ---,F---_..;~----;
L~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.....:,GU:::ID:::E~Llll:,:E_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-l-_;:,lf-l-_;:.._,{--°".;......;:4i'_* 6.1.2.2 (Cont'd) I
- e. DISPLAY POSITIONING - (Exhibit 6.1-7) .
(1) DISPLAY HEIGHT AND ORIEN-TATION (a) All displays, including annun- M YES cia.tor tiles, should be mounted so that they are within the upper limit of the visual field (750 above the horizontal line of sight) of the 5th percentile female. (b) In addition, all displays and M YES annunciators should be mounted so that the angle from the line of sight to the face plane is 450 or greater. The 5th percentile female determines the upper limit. The 95th percentile male determines the lower limit. (2) HORIZONTAL DISPLACE- M YES MENT - The oblique angle from the line of sight to a display located to either side of the working position from which the display must be read should be at least 45°. This includes annun-ciator tiles, which should be read-able from the acknowledge button. (See Exhibit 6.1-8.)
- f. LATERAL SPREAD OF CONTROLS M YES
-AND DISPLAYS - The operator should be able to perform task sequences at a given work station with minimum repositioning. The amount of operator movement required depends on the arrangement of controls and displays, not simply on the lateral dimensions of the segments of the control board. The maximum lateral spread of controls and displays at a single-operator work station should not exceed 72 inches .
40
TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED I 1,; Page 3 of 9
~11
- 6.1.2.2 (Cont'd)
IUIDELINE /'/l/,1/1 1
- g. FOOT ROOM - Enough foot room is D YES Plant speci-needed to allow the operator to fications get close to the board without indicate a 5" leaning. A clearance of 4 inches horizontal vertically and 4 inches clearance.
horizontally is recommended. 6.1.2.3 SIT-DOWN CONSOLE DIMENSIONS
- a. CONSOLE HEIGHT TO SEE OVER (1) If the seated operator must see 0 NO 20001402 CPT over the console, the console height should be no more than approximately 27 inches above the seat.to accommodate the 5th percentile adult female. Assum-ing seat height adjusted to 18 inches, maximum console height should therefore be 45 inches above the floor .
- (2) See-over console heights above 45 inches may be acceptable, for example, where the seated opera tor need only monitor (not read) status lights and annun-ciators beyond the console, if they are at a suitable distance 0 YES and height.
- b. CONTROL HEIGHT - All controls on a N/A N/A sit-down console should be within the reach radius of the 5th percentile fem ale. Measurements should be made using seated shoulder height wit!, the shoulder in line with the leading edge of the benchboard. This is illustrated in Exhibit 6.1-9.
- c. BENCHBOARD SLOPE - The bench- M YES board slope, in conjunction with its depth, should be such that all controls are within the functional reach radius of the 5th percentile female (as illu-strated in Exhibit 6.1-9) and all displays and markings can be read .
41
TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS Ix HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 9
- 6.1.2.3 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
~
~;'j &I"' .I
~
I
~
~
~
Ill , I
~.
~
- d. CONTROL DISTANCE FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE. CONSOLE I
I (1) . Controls should be set back a M YES minimum of 3 inches.from the front edge to protect against accidental activation. (2) Other controls may be mounted as M YES far. back as 25 inches from the console edge. This distance accommodates the extended func-tional reach of the 5th percentile as defined.
- e. DISPLAY POSITIONING (1) All displays, including annunciator M YES
. tiles, should be mounted so that
- they are within the upper limit of the visual field - 750 above the horizontal line of sight - of the 5th percentile female (see Exhibit 6.1-10).
(2) In addition, all displays should be M YES mounted so that the angle from the line of sight to the display face plane is 450 or greater (see Exhibit 6.1-10). The 5th percen-tile female determines the upper limit. (Practically, there is no lower limit for a plausible *sit-down console design.)
- f. LATERAL SPREAD OF CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS - (Exhibit 6.1-11)
(1) For control and monitoring D YES
*actions that must occur in sequ*ence, all necessary controls
. and displays should be within the maximum extended reach and the viewing range of the seated operator from a, single reference point.
42
TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED Page 5 of 9
- 6.1.2.3f (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE
~~~;
~
If
~~
I c;;
~i!I'
~ I
,\' ~
I<,
//7 ,I
~
~
~
7 (2) For the situation described in D YES item 1, above, and sustained or precise control action, the opera tor should be able to reach the controls without having to_ bend/stretch significantly.
- g. LEG AND FOOT ROOM - Sufficient M YES leg and foot room should be provided to enable seated operators to avoid awk-ward and uncomfortable positions.
Exhibit 6.1-12 shows the dimensions involved and gives minimums and ranges necessary to accommodate the 5th to 95th percentiles (as defined in Exhibit 6.1-5).
- h. WRITING SPACE ON CONSOLES -
Writing space may be needed by operators working at consoles.
- (1) An area at least 16 inches deep and 24 inches wide is recom-mended where these dimensions in the total configuration would fit operator reach capabilities. Less space may be adequate consider-ing the frequency and duration of NIA NIA writing requirements at control room consoles.
(2) If writing space is provided on the NIA *NIA console itself, it should not inter- ' fere with viewing and manipu-lation of controls and displays. (3) If writing is necessary but space NIA NIA on the console is not available, other arrangements such as a nearby desk or table should be provided . 43
TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 9
- GUIDELINE
~.1.2.4 SIT-STAND WORK STATIONS
/JYJ /
~
ft:
~
I
~
,;s
~
~
~ ~
I
~
la I ~ c1
~
~
~
4li'
~
~
I
- a. CONTROL AND DISPLAY POSI- NIA NIA TIONING - The height and lateral "
limits for controls and displays should conform to the guidelines given for stand-up consoles (Guideline 6.1.2.2).
- b. CHAIR HEIGHT - The operator should NIA NIA be provided with a high chair so that the seated eye height is approximately the same as standing eye height.
C, KNEE ROOM - Knee room and com- NIA NIA fortable foot support should be pro-vided:
. 6.1.2.5 VERTICAL PANELS
- a. CONTROL HEIGHT (1) Controls should be placed in an M NO 20A03'oo2. III-9 area between 34 inches and 70 20A03003 III-8 inches above the floor . 22A03038 III-8 22A03054 III-8 22A030.64 CPT (2) Controls requiring precise or D NO See (1) frequent operation and emergency above ,
controls should be placed in an area between 34 inches and 53 inches above the floor.
- b. DISPLAY HEIGHT (1) Displays should be placed in an M NO 20A02001 CPT area between 41 inches and 70 20A02002 CPT inches above the floor. 20A02036 11-6 (2) Displays that must be read fre- D NO 20A02090 CPT quently or precisely should be 20A02416 CPT placed in an area between 50 . 22A02083 1-2 inches and 65 inches above the 22A02084 11-6
. floor. 22A02085 11-6 22A02086 11-5 22A02087 1-2 22A02088 11-5
- 44
TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS&. HEDs GENERATED Page 7 or S
- &UIDELINE
----------------**-----l-~(---l------if---+--------1 6.7.2 CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) DIS-PLAYS 1/ll;lt/
/'/ / / , I II I 6.7.2.3 .OPERATOR-DISPLAY RELATION-SHIPS '
I
- a. VIEWING DISTANCE - Viewing dis- M YES tance should be greater than 18 inches.
- b. VIEWING ANGLE - The minimum M YES NOTE: Angles angle between the operator's actual for op. standing line-of-sight (LOS) as measured from directly in front the operator's normal work station, and of benchboard are the plane of the display screen should greater than 450.
be 45o or greater in either the \\hen operator horizontal or vertical direction. See stands between Exhibits 6.7-8 and 6.7-10. benchboard and vertical panel, s/he has room to move back to make angle acceptable. c* SCREEN LOCATION, SEA TED OPERATORS (1) CRT displays which require fre- N/A N/A Operators would quent or continuous monitoring, not be seated or which may display important when viewing the (e.g., alarm) information, should Surry CRT be located within the following displays. limits as measured from the nor-mal operator work station (see Exhibit 6. 7-9): (a) Horizontal limits - Not more N/A N/A than 35° to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b} Vertical limits - Not more N/A N/A than 20° above and 400 below the operator's horizontal LOS. (2) CRT displays which do not require N/A N/A frequent or continuous monitor-ing, and which will not display important (e.g., alarm} infor-mation, should be located within the following limits .
- 45
TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED _Page 8 of 9
§ YJ&!
r,,
~
~
I~ ~ ~
~
I ~ I
~ ~ ~
~ I s;
~ ~
1/111
~ ~
Cl' GUIDELINE 6.7.2.3c (Cont'd) (a) Horizontal limits - Not more than 950 to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits - Not more N/A N/A than 700 above and 900 below the operator's horizontal LOS.
- d. SCREEN LOCATION, STANDING OPERATORS (1) CRT displays which require fre-quent or continuous monitoring, or which may display important (e.g., alarm) information, should be located within the following limits as measured from the nor-mal operator work station:
(a) Horizontal limits - Not more N/A N/A than 35° to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits - Not more M YES than 350 above and 250 below D the operator's horizontal LOS. (2) CRT displays which do not require frequent or continuous monitor-ing, and which will not display important (e.g., alarm) infor-mation, should be located within fhe following limits (as measured from normal operator work stations which permit full operator head and eye rotation): (a) Horizontal limits - Not more M YES than 950 to the left or right of D the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits - Not more M YES than 850 above and 900 below D the operator's horizontal LOS . 46
TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED .Page 9 of 9 1 __________ /J0 "!. la "'/ G:.:U:;:ID;,:;EL::.;:IN;.:.E_....;__ _ _ _ _ _ _-l-_
~
4
~
_c.
,l!1 I'¥
~I-#
~ ~ ....
~b
~_~...;..§_f-___.;.t!f--jF----'-----,
6.'l .2.3d (Cont'd)
- e. MOUNTING IN CONSOLES - When
- NIA NIA Not mounted in CRTs are perm~nently mounted in con- console.
- soles, the console configuration, ,
dimensions, and type of use (suclvas seated, sit-stand, or standing) affects the CRT/operator interface. Consoles in which CRTs are installed should con-form to the guidelines of Section 6.1.2.
- f. VISIBILITY OF DATA - All.data and 0 YES messages on the CR'l' screen should be within the unobstructed view of .an operator at the normal work station.
- 47
3.3 illumination Survey This section documents the results of the illumination survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Surry CRDR Program Plan. 3.3.1 Objectives The objectives of the illuminat.ion survey were to: J
- a. Assess the degree to which the illumination levels under normal and emergency lighting in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify and document any characteristics of control room illumination that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- 3.3.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the illumination characteristics in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The illumination topics evaluated include:
- Illumination levels Unirormity of illumination levels Shadowing Glare Reflectance
- Color.
3.3.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 .paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.5.3a through h, and 6.1.5.4c. The detailed definitions for each criteria are presented in Table 3-3.
- 3.3.4 Methods 3.3.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data collected during operator interviews were reviewed to identify CR areas having potential illumination problems.
- b. Direct measurements of CR illumination were made. using a Tektronix digital photometer (Model J16} with illuminance probe (Model J6511}.
All equipment had been recently calibrated by Leasametric, Inc
- 48
- c. An illumination reading was taken at each control panel in the 'primary operating area as well as at the computer consoles (see Figures 3-3A and 3-3B}. Measurements were taken under normal lighting conditions.
Extant illumination levels were recorded on data sheets depicting the location at which the measurement was taken. All deviations from NUREG-0700 guidelines were noted and recorded. 3.3.4.2 Analysis - Data we.re analyzed according to the following procedure:*
- a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports.
- Recorded information included the lighting source or affected components, a description of the problem including .
the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or . more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
- c. Upon compledon of all analyses, the criteria of the illumination task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
3.3.4 Findings
- The findings of the illumination survey are presented in Table 3-3, "Illumination Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 11 criteria were applied to the displays in the Surry control room. Of those criteria, 6 (55%) were in compliance, and 5 (45%) were not in compliance. A total of* 4 HEDs were generated which document all of the 5 criteria that were not met. *In general, those HEDs address insufficient illumination levels in some areas, lack of uniformity in illumination levels, shadowing, and glare in the control room.
- Table 3-3 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section. 5.0 for an explanation of assessment category). Note that "CPT"
- means co~plete and indicates that no further action needs to be .taken on an HED
- 49
lI l@I
-:1 c..n 0
/;';\ BENCH BOARD '56' v::.I SECTION 1*2 ~
33 35 D FRONT VERTICAL CONTROL BOARD D SECTION 1-2 FIGURE 3*3A UNIT 1 ILLUMINATION MEASUREMENTS CIRCLED READINGS ARE GIVEN IN FOOTCANDLES
I .1 I I I IIII lei I I BENCH BOARD SECTION 2-1 @ D e D FRONT VERICAL CONTROL BOARD SECTION 2*1 FIGURE 3-3B UNIT 2 ILLUMINATION MEASUREMENTS CIRCLED READINGS ARE GIVEN IN FOOTCANDLES
TABLE 3-3 ILLUMINATION SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 o! 2
- GUIDELINE 1///$1/1/ I I
6.1.5.3 ILLUMINATION.
- a. LEVELS - (from Exhibit 6.1-22) M .NO 20000008 Ill-8 Numbers are the min-recommended-max in ftC.
(1) Panels, primary 20-30-50 (2) Aux panels 20-30-50 (3) Scale indicators 20-30-50 (4) Seated operations 50-75-100 (5) Reading, handwriting 50-75-100 (6) Reading, print 20-30-50 (7) Writing 50-75-100 (8) Maintenance 20-30-50 (9) Emergency operations - as above for area/task .
- b.
c. UNIFORMITY - The level of illumination should not vary greatly over a given work station. SUPPLEMENTAL IJGHT - Supplemental lighting should be 0 0 YES YES provided for personnel performing specialized visual tasks in areas where fixed illumination is not adequate.
- d. TASK AREA LUMINANCE RATIOS - I NO* 20000014 Ill-8 To determine task lighting requirements, it is necessary to consider the levels of lighting which surround a task. Great disparities between task and background lighting can lead to adaptation problems. To ensure effective visual performance, the task area luminance ratios in Exhibit 6.1-23 should not be exceeded.
- 52
TABLE 3-3 ILLUMINATION SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 2
- GUIDELINE ~"
~
i'j~/
~ s:~
~~
I
~'"
1/ ~ it It Co I
~
,~
I 6.1.5.3 (Cont'd)
- e. SHADOWING - To reduce operator I NO 20000014 111-8 fatigue and eyestrain, shadows should be avoided.
(1) Ambient illumination should be 0 YES provided via indirect or diffuse lighting. (2) Labels, instructions, and other 0 YES written information should not be in shadowed positions.
- f. GLARE - Glare should not interfere I NO 20000014 III-8 with the readability of displays, labels, 0 20000009 II-6 or indicators.
- g. REFLECTANCE - The amount of 0 YES reflected light is affected by illuminated surface colors. Reflectance should conform to the recommendations shown in Exhibit 6.1-24. (See also Exhibit 6.1-25.)
- h. COLOR - Surface colors should be I NO 20000003 III-8 recognizable under both normal and emergency lighting conditions.
6.1.5.4 EMERGENCY LIGHTING
- c. LIGHTING LEVELS - The control M YES room emergency illumination system should be designed to provide a minimum illumination level of 10 footcandles at all work stations in the primary operating area.
I 53
,. 3.4 Ambient Noise Survey This section documents the results of the ambient noise survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Surry CRDR Program Plan. 3.4.1 Objectives The objectives of the ambient .noise survey were to: A .
- a. Assess the degree to which the ambient noise in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify* and document any features of the ambient noise in the control room that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.4.2 Scope The scope of the survey extends to the assessment of the ambient noise in the mairi control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:
- Auditory environment
- Background noise
- Noise distractions.
3.4.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.5.Sa through e. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-4C. 3.4.4 Method 3.4.4.1 Procedure Preparation and Conduct - The procedure employed in the conduct of this task was as*follows:
- a. The results of the operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problems with ambient noise levels in the CR.
- b. Data were collected using methods and procedures consisting of observa-tions, measurements, questionnaires and interviews
- 54
- c. All measurements were made using a Gen Rad Model 1982 noise meter
. and probe calibrated prior to data collections. Noise was measured in dB on the A-scale for weighted averages and the following octaves (in Hz):
- 31.5
- 63
- 125
- 250
- 500
- 1000
- 2000
- 4000
- 8000
- 16000 Figures 3-4A and 3-4B indicate the control room locations where noise measurements were taken. The reactor was at power, and approximately 10 people (including the data collectors) were in the control room. The survey was taken during the day shift.
3.4.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the fallowing procedure:
- a.
b. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the noise source involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED from. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
- c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the ambient noise task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
3.4.5 Findings Tables 3-4A and 3-4B present the ambient noise data measured and documented
- during data collection.
The findings of the ambient noise survey are presented in Table 3-4C "Ambient Noise Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 5 criteria were applied to the ambient noise in the Surry control room. Of those criteria, 1 .(20%) was in compliance, and 4 (80%) were not in compliance. A total of 5 HEDs were generated which document
- all of the 4 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address background noise levels and noise distractions.
55
D 0 0
© 0
[ (0 I I I FIGURE 3-4A UNIT 1 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
TABLE 3-4A NOISE SURVEY RECORD PLANT/UNIT: SURRY /UNIT -1 SHEET NO. _ _ l _ _ qF _ _ 2_ _ MEASUREMENTS MADE BY:-~D.:...-=S~E~IB,:.:;E;.:.:.R. :. T_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.....;__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SOUND LEVEL METER M0DEL: __ G_EN_R_AD_1_98_2_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SERIAL N0.: _ __..._5......__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CALIBRATION DATE: ___ 3._/4..../.... 8..... 5 _ _ _ __ MICROPHONE TYPE:_....R,;:.A;.;.;.N:;.,;DO~M.:. . ;.;IN~C;.;.1.:;,;DE:;.;.N.;.; ;C.; :.E_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ sERIAL N O . : - - - - - - - - - - - - ACCESSORIES; _ _ _ _ P_RE_-_AM_P-',_WI_N_D_SC_R_E_EN_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SLOW RESPONSE MODE. db RANGE 30-80 SOUND LEVEL (db) DATE TIME NOISE CONDITION/ MEASUREMENT SIGNAL SOURCE LOCATION -~
.D "Cl OCTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCY (Hz) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 K,()Oll IMPACT/
IMPULSE REMARKS 3/4/85 1930 BACKGROUND 1 65 67 67 66 62 62 58 54 50 49 54 MAX OF 71 dbA 3/4/8~ 1940 BACKGROUND 2 68 71 72 66 64 65 60 63 56 45 56 MAX OF 76 dbA 3/4/85 1945 BACKGROUND 3 66 68 64 67 62 64 55 54 50 49 54 MAX OF 76 dbA 3/4/85 1950 BACKGROUND 4 67 70 66 65 62 63 69 60 48 44 54 MAX OF 76 dbA TALKING NEARBY 3/4/85 1955 BACKGROUND 5 65 67 70 64 64 61 56 56 57 47 59 MAX OF 81 dbA 3/4/8~ 2000 BACKGROUND 6 67 66 72 67 63 64 59 54 49 45 47 3/4/8~ 2005 BACKGROUND 7 65 72 66 65 62 59 58 52 53 60 70 MAX OF 87 dbA
TABLE 3-4A NOISE SURVEY RECORD PLANT/UNIT: SURRY /UNIT-1 SHEET N0. _ _2 _ _ OF _ _ 2_ _ . MEASUREMENTS MADE BY:.,.._D_._S_E_IB_E_R_T_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SOUND LEVEL METER MODEL: _ _ GE_N_RA_D_l9_8_2_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SERIAL N0.: __0_5_5_9_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __... CALIBRATION DATE: _ _ _3_/4 _ /_8_5_ _ __ MICROPHONE TYPE: _ _.8....8....N.... PQ....M.._...IN....C...,I.... PE....N..,.C.-E_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SERIAL N O . : - - - - - - - - - - - - ACCESSORIES: _ _ _.;..P;..;.;RE_-.;..;A;..;.;MP~.;..;.;WI-N;.;;.D.;;..SC-R.;.;;E.;;..EN;..;__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SLOW RESPONSE MODE db RANGE 30-80 SOUND LEVEL (db) DATE NOISE CONDITION/ MEASUREMENT OCTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCY (Hz) TIME REMARKS SIGNAL SOURCE LOCATION ~
.D IMPACT/
"O 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 9'000 IMPULSE 3/4/8~ 2010 BACKGROUND 8 68 72 70 65 61 63 64 57 58 43 40 MAX OF 80 dbA
D D
@ 0
~ © J
© 0
0 I I I I I I ] *I I FIGURE 3-48 UNIT 2 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
TABLE 3-48 NOISE SURVEY RECORD PLANTIUNIT: SURRY /UNIT-2 SHEET NO. _ _l _ _ OF__;...._ 2_ _ MEASUREMENTS MADE BY: _ _;;..D.;. . .;;.S.;;;..;EI;..;;B~E.:. :.RT.;. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SOUND LEVEL METER MODEL: ____ G_EN_R__ AD_1_98_2_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SERIAL N0.: _ ___;0~5~5.;..9_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CALIBRATION DATE: _ __,3/.....4..._/_85_ _ _ __ MICROPHONE TYPE: _____ RA__N __D__OM____I_N_CI__D-E_NC_E_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SERIAL N O . : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACCESSORIES: _ _ _ _ _P-R-E-_A-M-P_W_I_N.;;...DS-C_R_EE_N_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SLOW RESPONSE MODE db RANGE 30-80 SOUND LEVEL (db) NOISE CONDITION# MEASUREMENT OCTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCY (Hz) DATE TIME REMARKS SIGNAL SOURCE LOCATION ~
.a IMPACT/
- 0) "O 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 l&,000 IMPULSE 0
3/4/8 1 1720 BACKGROUND 1 89 75 69 68 66 63 60 61 58 62 72 DOOR CLOSING 3/4/8 1 1730 BACKGROUND 2 69 75 69 65 68 70 69 66 55 60 70 MAX OF 81 dbA 3/4/8 1 1735 BACKGROUND 3 73 71 66 64 65 64 62 54 54 62 71 3/4/8! 1740 BACKGROUND 4 71 73 63 67 62 60 61 57 53 60 71 3/4/8~ 1750 BACKGROUND 5 69 71 65 62 62 63 62 56 50 49 54 MAX OF 70 dbA 3/4/8! 1800 BACKGROUND 6 68 72 67 62 62 59 57 55 49 45 54 MAX OF 83 dbA 3/4/8 1 1805 BACKGROUND 7 69 70 64 63 60 67 59 53 57 51 54 MAX OF 85 dbA
TABLE 3-4B NOISE SURVEY RECORD PLANTIUNIT: _ _s_UR_R_v_1u_N_I_T_-2_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SHEET N0. __2_ _ 0F 2 MEASUREMENTS MADE BY: _ _.. ;;D;..;. _S=E;;.::I.::;.B;;;.;ER.:. . :T_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SOUND LEVEL METER MODEL: __G.; ;. ;E; .;.N;. . ;.; RA..;.; D~l9;. ;8;.; ;2_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SERIAL N0.: _ _0......5__ 5__ 9 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CALIBRATION DATE: _ _3_./__4.._/8__5_ _ _ __ MICROPHONE TYPE: ----=RA.:.:.N=D.:.:.:9M..:-.:.I.:.:.NC=I:..::D.,_EN:.:.:C;;..::E,__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ $ERIAL N O . : - - - - - - - - - - - - ACCESSORIES: _ _ _ _ _ _P_R_E-_A_M_P_W_I_ND_S_C_R_EE_N_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SLOW RESPONSE MODE db RANGE 30-80 SOUND LEVEL (db) NOISE CONDITION/ MEASUREMENT DATE TIME SIGNAL SOURCE LOCATION . cl
. .0
'O OCTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCY (Hz) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 11,00lll IMPACTI IMPULSE REMARKS 13/4/85 1815 BACKGROUND 8 73 75 67 62 77 77 61 54 51 50 56 MAX OF 81 dbA 3/4/85 1905 BACKGROUND 9 63 74 69 63 62 61 57 55 54 50 54 MAX OF 81 dbA
~/4/85 1910 BACKGROUND 10 64 67 65 63 60 58 62 57 57 48 54 3/4/85 1915 BACKGROUND 11 68 73 70 64 63 59 56 61 48 47 54
Table 3-4C also includes that category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section 5.0 for an explanation of assessment category). Note that the category "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED .
- 62
TABLE 3-4C AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 1
- GUIDELINE 6.1.5.5 AUDITORY ENVIRONMENT - The acoustic design of the control room should
~~bl ///
~
~
~
qI
;:
$ ~I
~
~
q:
~
I ensur'e that verbal communic.ations between operators are not impaired; auditory signals are readily detected; and audito*ry distrac-tion, irritation, and fatigue of operators are minimized.
- a. BACKGROUND NOISE - Background M NO 20000010 II-5 noise should not impair verbal com I 20000012 II-5 munication between any two points in the primary operating area. Verbal communications between these points should be intelligible using normal or slightly raised _voice levels.
- b. LIMIT. - Background noise levels* M NO 20000011 CPT*
should not exceed 65 dB(A).
- c. FURTHER REDUCTIONS - Further* I NO 20000004 II-5 reductions in background noise may be required where communications between the primary operating* area and
- d.
other control room lo.cations are neces-sary and voice tl:'ansmission systems are not provided. NOISE DISTRACTIONS - Noise dis-
- tractions generated either inside or outside the control room should be I
I NO 20000004 20000005 II-5 CPT minimized.
- e. REVERBERATION TIME AND SOUND M YES ABSORPTION - The acoustical treat-ment of the control room should limit reverberation time to one second or less .
63
3.5 Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Survey This section documents the results of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HV AC) survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.5.1 Objectives The objectives of the HVAC survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which the HV AC in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify and document any features of the HVAC that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.5.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the HV AC in the main control room at the Surry Power Station using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:
- 3.5.3 Criteria Temperature and humidity Ventilation.
The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.5.la and b and 6.L5.2a and b. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-5. 3.5.4 Method
- 3. 5. 4.1 Data Collection
- a. All required data forms, plant documentation, engineering drawings, equipment, and materials were made available prior to conduct of this task. Permission was obtained for all required access to the control room.
- b. Data were collected using methods and procedures consisting of obser-vations, measurements, and document reviews
- 64
- c. Plant documentation was reviewed to verify the items listed in the Document Review Checklist in HV AC task plan. The required plant documents include:
Historical data HV AC system specifications
- Plant temperature and humidity.
3.5.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:
- a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the system involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
- c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the HV AC task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
3.5.5 Findings The findings of the HV AC survey are presented in Table 3-5 "HVAC Survey Findings
- and HEDs Generated." Overall, four criteria were applied to the HVAC systems in the Surry control room. Of those criteria, one (25%) was in compliance, and three (75%) were not in compliance. A total of four HEDs were generated which document all of the three criteria which were not met. In general, those HEDs address control room temperature variability, maintenance of comfortable temperatures, and draft control in the primary opera ting area.
Table 3-5 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that ."CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED . 65
TABLE 3-5 HY AC SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 1
- 6.1.5.1 GUIDELINE TEMPERA TORE AND HUMIDITY
~
i! V// ///
~
~
<:i
~~
I
~
~
c1
~
ii 4l'
~
~
I
- a. COMFORT ZONE - The climate con- M NO 20000006 III-9 trol system should be capable of 20000013 IIl-9 maintaining temperature and~humidity within the shaded area com(ort zone shown in Figure 8-1.
- b. TEMPERATURE DIFFERENTIAL - I NO 20000002 III-9 Air temperature at floor level and at head level should not differ by more than lOOF.
6.1.5.2 VENTILATION
- a. AIR QUANTITY - The ventilation I YES system should be capable of introducing outdoor air into the control room at a rate of at at least 15 cubic feet per minute (cfm) per occupant.
- b. AIR VELOCITY - Air velocities in the I NO 20000002 IIl-9 primary operating area should not 20000007 III-9 exceed 45 feet per minute (fpm) measured at operator head level and should not produce a noticeable draught.
- 66
3.6 Emergency Equipment Survey
- This section documents the results of the emergency equipment survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan.
3.6.1 Objectives The objectives of the emergency equipment survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which the emergency equipment in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0'100. *
- b. Identify and document any features of the emergency equipment that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.6.2 Scope The scope of the effort extended to the assessment of the emergency equipment in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:
- Operators' protective equipment
- Fire, radiation, and rescue equipment
- Emergency equipment storage
- Emergency lighting
- Emergency communications
- Operator compatibility with emergency gear.
3.6.3 *Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.4.la through i, 6.1.4.2a through e, 6.1.4.3a and b, 6.1.5.4a and b, 6.2.1.Sa through c(3), 6.4.1.ld. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-6 *
- 67
3.6.4 Method 3.6.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data were collected using operator interviews and the checklists con-tained in the emergency equipment task plan.
- b. The emergency equipment evaluated was limited to equipment stored in immediate proximity to the primary operating area, specifically: pro-tective clothing, breathing apparatus and air packs.
- c. CR operators experienced in the use of the emergency equipment were observed donning and doffing the equipment. The operators were instructed to describe any problems encountered while using the equip-ment. Comments were noted and recorded.
3.6.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:
. a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the equip-ment involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
c* Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the emergency equip-ment task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria. 3.6.5 Findings The findings of the emergency equipment survey are presented in Table 3-6, "Emergency Equipment Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 25 criteria were applied to the emergency equipment in the Surry control room. Of these, 2 (8%) were not applicable, 11 (44%) were in compliance, and 12 (48%) were not in compliance. Eleven HEDs were generated which document the 12 criteria that were not met. In general, the HEDs address the compatibility of the emergency equipment with operator sizes, the availability, accessibility, and orderly storage of the equipment, and adequate emergency communications capabilities. Table 3-6 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPTII stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED *
- 68
TABLE 3-6 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 3
- GUIDELINE 6.1.4.1 OPERATOR PROTECTIVE EQUIP-MENT
~
~
j'j&/ I
~
§
~
~~
I
~
~ ~
c1
~
~
I ~
<t'
~
~
I
- a. TYPES OF EQUIPMENT - .Protective 0 YES No requirement equipment should include protective for protective clothing and breathing apparatus. clothing - per station SOP.
- b. ANTHROPOMETRY - Protective I NO 20000503 UI-9 clothing and breathing equipment 20000501 111-9 should be compatible with operator 20000202 11-7 body sizes and tasks to provide ade-quate tactile sensitivity and ability to see, reach, move, communicate, and hear.
- c. PERIODIC CHECKS - Operator pro- D YES tective equipment should be periodi-cally checked to determine if it is in good condition.
- d. QUANTITY - . There should be pro- I !NO 20000501
- III-9 tective equipment available in sufficient quantities and sizes for the required number of operators:
- e. MARKING ~ Protective clothing sizes N/A IN/A should be clearly identifiable.
- f. EXPENDABLES - There should be an 0 !YES adequate supply of personal protection equipment expendables, such as filters.
- g. ACCESSIBILITY - All protective I ~o 20000504 CPT equipment should be easily and readily accessible.
- h. .'.!'RAINING - Operators should be well I ~o 20000502 CPT practiced in donning protective equip-ment.
- i. PROCEDURES - Instructions for don- NIA 'NIA Handled in ning, doffing, and controlling personal training protective equipment should be provided .
- 69
TABLE 3-6 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 2 or 3
~~7 ~/
- . IIUIDELINE 6.1.4.2 FIRE, RADIATION, AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT*
I
"' I ,I I I
~
- a. PERIODIC CHECKS - All equipni'ent I YES C should be periodically checked to deter-mine if it is in good condition.
- b. ACCF.S.,IBILITY - All equipment I NO 20000504 CPT should be easily and readily accessible.
- c. TRAINING - Operators should be D YES trained in the use of all emergency equipment.
- d. PROCEDURES - There should be a D YES written, administratively approved procedure for each type of emergency or combination of emergencies.
- e. AUTOMATIC WARNING SYSTEM - 0 YES There should be an automatic fire warning system for control room fires.
6.1.4.3 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT STOR-AGE
- a. PROPER STORAGE - Provision should I NO 20000501 III-9 be made for the orderly storage, in the control room, of emergency equipment that is needed by control room person-neL
- b. ACCESS - The storage location(s) may 0 NO 20000501 III-9 be away from the primary operating area but should be accessible, clearly marked, and known to all personnel.
6.1.5.4 EMERGENCY LIGHTING
- a. AUTOMATIC ACTION - A control 0 YES room emergency lighting system should be automatically activated and immedi-a tely available upon failure or the nor-mal control room lighting system. This system should be independent or any other plant lighting system that is available in the control room .
70
TABLE 3-6 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SURVEY FINDINGS~ HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 3
- GUIDELINE 6.1.5.4 EMERGENCY LIGHTING (cont'd)
~
i!~&7 I. I~
~
~
~,
~
~
~
t!
~
I;
~
Ct'
~
~
I
- b. OPERABILITY - Failure of the normal 0 YES control room lighting system should not degrade operability of the emergency lighting system.
6.2.1.8 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
- a. BACKUP EQUIPMENT - Provisions I NO 20000203 II-7 should be made to assure complete 20000204 II-7 internal and external communications 20000205 II-7 capabilities during emergencies 20000206 II-7 20000207 II-7 20000212 Il-7
- b. EQUIPMENT USABILITY - Communi- I NO 20000202 II-7 cations equipment should be usable by personnel wearing protective gear with-out impediment to their tasks.
C, VOICE COMMUNICATIONS WITH MASKS
- (1)
(2) Emergency face masks should be equipped with diaphragms that are specially designed to transmit speech. The diaphragms should be able to separate voice from exhaust valve I I NO NO 20000202 20000202 II-7 II-7 action. (3) If not equipped with diaphragms, I NO 20000202 Il-7 masks should be equipped with electronic speech systems which pick up the voice with an internal microphone and transmit it to a loudspeaker attached outside the mask. 6.4.1.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES
- d. COMPATIBILITY WITH EMERGENCY GEAR - If used while wearing protec-tive equipment (e.g., oxygen masks, protective gloves), controls should be:
(1) Easy to identify. I YES (2) Easy to activate. I YES
- 71
- 3. 7 Maintainability Survey
- This section documents the results of the maintainability survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan.
- 3. 7.1 Objectives I
The objectives of the maintairiability survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which components with
- integral lighting are operator-maintainable as defined in NUREG-0700.
- b. Assess the degree to which display failures are recognizable by the operator as defined in NUREG-0700.
- c. Assess to what degree spare parts, operating expendables and special tools are available and adequate. for use by the operator during operator maintenance activities as defined in NUREG-0700.
- b. To identify and document any features in the control room operator maintainability design that do. not conform to the criteria defined in NUREG-700.
3.7.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of control room design features defined as maintenance performed by the operators in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The maintain-ability topics evaluated include:
- Spare parts
- Opera ting expendables
- Tools
- General requirements for voice communications systems
- Lamp replacement of annunciator panels
- Provisions for lamp failure on legend and nonlegend indicator lights
- Characteristics and problems of indicator lights
- General characteristics of graphic recorders.
The Maintainability Survey did not address the general control room or plant design for maintainability*
- 72
- 3. 7 .3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.1.5a through f, 6.2.1.lb, 6.3.31c(l) through (3), 6.4.3.3c(l) through (4),
6.5.3.la(l) through (3) and c(2), 6.5.4.le and f. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-7. 3.7.4 Method
- 3. 7.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data were collected using operator interviews and the checklist con-tained in the maintainability task plan.
- b. Since operating experience was required to ass~ss compliance with the
- various maintainability guidelines, the necessary data were collected through interviews of CR operators.
- c. All discrepancies were noted and recorded.
- 3. 7.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:
- a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the equip-ment involved (e.g., bulbs, chart paper, inking pens, etc.), a description
- b.
of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
- c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the maintainability task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
- 3. 7.5 Findings The findings of the maintainability survey are presented in Table 3-7, "Maintain-ability Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 20 criteria were applied in .the maintainability survey in the Surry control room. . Of those criteria, 7 (35%) were in compliance, and 13 (65%) were not in compliance. A total of 6 HEDs were generated which document all of the 13 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address
- the lack of expendables or spare parts in the control room, storage, inventory, lamp test, and lamp replacement.
Table 3-7 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" means complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED. 73
TABLE 3-7 MAINTAINABIIJTY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 or 3
- GUIDELINE 6.1.1.5 SPARE PARTS, OPERATING EXPENDABLES, AND TOOLS
~~jtj~/
J! {I
~
g
~ ~
{I ~ ~ c!
~
7 #
.,it
~
7
- a. SUPPLY - There shouid be an ade- I NO 20000109 III-9 quate supply of expendables and spare 20A00115 CPT parts: fuses, bulbs, ink and inking pens, recorder charts, printer paper, etc
- b. ~CCESSIBIIJTY - Expendables and I NO 20000109 III-9 spare parts should be readily accessible.
- c. TOOLS - All necessary or special I NO 20000016 III-9 replacement tools needed to install 20000110 IIl-9 expendables and spare parts should be available.
- d. . STORAGE SP ACE - There should be I NO 20000015 III-9 adequate storage space for expendables and spare parts.
- e. CODING - When different types, I NO 20000015 III-9 sizes, or styles of expendables and spare parts are required, they should be clearly and distinctively marked to avoid misapplication.
- f. INVENTORY - Records should be kept I NO 20000109 III-9 as to the status of expendables and spare parts.
6.2.1.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR VOICE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
- b. PERIODIC MAINTENANCE TESTS - I NO 20A00213 Il-7 These should be performed on all com-munication systems to ensure that the system is normally operative and effective under changes in ambient noise levels that may have occurred since the last check.
- 74
TABLE 3-7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 3
- GUIDELINE 6.3.3.1 VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS
;!
II
~
~/. ///
~
I
;::;
~
-\'
I 4l
~
ii
~
~
I
- c. LAMP REPLACEMENT (1) If a lamp replacement requires I YES Procedurally legend tile removal, there should controlled be a way to ensure that the tile is replaced in the correct location.
(2) Lamp replacement should not I NO 20000110 Ill-9 subject the opera tor to a shock hazard. (3) Operator aids should be provided I NO 20000110 lll-9 if needed for lamp replacement. 6.4.3.3 LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS
- c. PROVISION FOR LAMP FAIL URE .
(1) A lamp test or dual lamp/dual 0 NO 20A01216 II-6 filament capability should be provided .
- (2)
(3)
- Lamps within the pushbutton should be replaceable from the front of the panel.
Legend pushbuttons should not short out during lamp replace-I I YES YES ment or be susceptible to inad-vertent activation during the process of lamp removal or replacement. (4) Legend covers should be keyed to l YES Procedurally prevent the possibility of inter- controlled changing the covers. 6.5.3.1 CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS
- a. PRECAUTIONS TO ASSURE .*
AVAILABILITY (1) Dual-bulb or dual-filament light I YES assemblies should be used . 75
TABLE 3-7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 3
- GUIDELINE 6.5.3.1 CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS (Cont'd)
~
I! ~~!* ~
#~
~
~ ,~
~ ~
~
/J~
7 ~ ct'
~ *~
I
- a. PRECAUTIONS TO ASSURE AVAILABILITY (Cont'd) I I
(2) Bulb-test capability should be 0 NO 20A01216 II-6 provided. (3) Design should encourage immedi- I YES ate replacement of burned-out bulbs by providing for rapid and convenien~ bulb replacement with power on and without hazard to personnel or equipment.
- c. PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID MISINTER-PRETATION (2) Provisions (design or procedural) I YES Procedurally should be made to prevent inter- controlled changing indicator lenses.
- 6.5.4.1 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS
- e. ' AVAILABILITY OF EXPENDABLES ~
Paper, ink, and other operator-maintained expendables should be provided and accessible in the control I NO 20000015 III-9
. room.
- f. EASE OF ROUTINE REPLENISH- I NO 20000015 III-9 MENT - Recorder design should permit quick and easy replenishment of paper and ink.
76
3.8 Communications Survey
- This section docu~ents the results of the communications survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Surry CRDR Program Plan.
3.8.1 Objectives The objectives of the communications survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which the communication* systems in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify and document any features of the communication systems that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.8.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the communications survey design* in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:
*
- Requirements for voice communications
- Conventional-powered telephone systems
- Walkie-talkie transceivers
- Announcing systems
- Intercom system
- Emergency communications
- Auditory signals
- Signal meanings
- Auditory coding techniques
- Signal intensity
- Reliability of auditory alarms.
3.8.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.3.lb; 6.2.1.lc(l) and (2); 6.2.1.2a through e; 6.1.1.3a through e; 6.2.1.4a through e; 6.2.1.Sa through c; 6.2.l.6a through f; 6.2.1. 7a and b; 6.2.1.8a through c; 6.2.2.la through c; 6.2.2.2a through c; 6.2.2.3a through e; 6.2.24a and b; 6.2.2.4a and b; 6.2.2.Sa and b; 6.2.2.6a through c; 6.2.2. 7a through c. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-8 . 77
3.8.4 Method
- 3.8.4.1 Data Collection a.
- b.
The results of the operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problem areas in the design and/or operation of the various Surry communications systems. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the communi-cations task plan. Data were collected primarily through direct observa-tion of the performance characteristics (e.g., intelligibility) of the various communications,.' As necessary, system documents (e.g., techni-cal specifications for public address system) were reviewed to augment or corroborate observations. 3.8.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the fallowing procedure:
- a. All deviations from the criteria* were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the system involved (e.g., Gai-Tronics system, telephone system, meters, chart recorders, etc.), a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED farm. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
c* Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the communications task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
- 3.8.5 Findings The findings of the communications survey are presented in Table 3-8, "Communications Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 87 criteria were applied to the communications systems in the Surry control room. Of these, 14 (16%) were not applicable, 57 (66%) were in compliance and 16 (18%) were not in compliance. A total of 12 HEDs were generated which document all the 16 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address communications problems, telephone cords in traffic paths, and annunciator alarms which are not directional.
Table 3-8 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" means complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED *
- 78
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS &. HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 12
- GUIDELINE 6.1.3.1 UNIT INTEGRATION AND INTER-
~
I! J1j *
;:::~
~
~ ~
.~///
~
~
;:r
~
~
~
~
~
I FERENCE
- b. SENIOR OPERATOR STATION - 0 NO 20001402 CPT Senior operators who supervise and assist operations of more than one unit need to be stationed so that they can communicate effectively with opera-tors in each unit and have an unob-structed visual path to the control boards of each unit.
6.2.1.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR VOICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
- c. EMERGENCY MESSAGES (1) OUTGOING - Priority I NO 20000204 II-7 procedures should be established 20000205 II-7 for the transmission of emergency 20000206 II-7 messages from the control room 20000207 II-7 by any of the communication 20000212 II-7 systems.
(2) INCOMING - Procedures should I NO 20000204 II-7 be established for handling corn- 20000205 II-7 munications during an emergency 20000206 II-7 and these procedures must be 20000207 II-7 known by all operators. 20000212 II-7 6.2.1.2 CONVENTIONAL-POWERED TELE-PHONE SYSTEMS
- a. FREQUENCY RESPONSE - The I NO 20000204 II-7 Standard powered telephone system must provide commercial
-good frequency response in that portion equipment; but of the auditory spectrum most essential line is noisy.
for intelligibility. Standard telephone bandpass is acceptable (200-3300 Hz).
- b. HANDSETS - Design should incor-poi'at:e the following features:
(1) Size and shape should be compati- 0 [YES ble with operator's hand size and mouth-ear distance (standard telephone dimensions acceptable) . 79
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 12
- 6.2.1.2 b.(Cont'd)
GUIDELINE Ii~ ~I. la I
§
;.;
~
q I
~
~
$~
I
~
I;
!5 15! 6
~
I (2) Should maintain firm ear contact 0 YES by receiver while transmitter is positioned to receive voice waves directly from mouth. (3) Cords should be of nonkink or 0 YES self-retracting type. (4) Cords should be of sufficient 0 YES length to permit reasonable operator mobility. (5) Cords should be positioned so as 0 YES to avoid entangling critical con-trols or endangering passing traf-fie. (6) Vertically mounted handset 0 YES cradles should be designed and located to prevent the handset from being knocked out of the
- (7) cradle by passing traffic .
Where multiple telephone instru-ments are located close together (e.g., on a single desk) they should be coded to indicate circuit or function. 0 YES (8) If a press-to-talk button is used, 0 YES the button should be convenient to both left and right hand opera-tion.
- c. SWITCiilNG MECHANISM -
(1) Switching should be designed 0 YES and/or programmed to minimize delay in making desired connec-tioI')s under both normal and emergency conditions. (2) Switching should be programmed NO N/A to give the control room auto-ma tic priority of access to the *, switching system.
- d. TELEPHONE RINGING - Loudness of 0 YES ringing should be adjustable at the indi-vidual telephone instrument.
80
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 3 or 12 I i//I $/ ~*
~
~ ~ '" 8 #
&UIDELIIIE I ~
~
6.2.1.2 (Cont'd)
- e. ANNOUNCING USE - When transmit- 0 YES
- ters, within the powered telephone system, are used as the microphone input to the announcing system, the transmitter should be compatible with the rest of the announcing system.
6.2.1.3 SOUND-POWERED TELEPHONE SYSTEMS
- a. SOUND QUALITY - Within engineer-ing constraints imposed by sound-powering, the system should provide:
(1) Good frequency response in the 0 YES band from 200 to 3300 Hz (stan-dard telephone quality). (2) In-phase feedback to the user. 0 YES
- b. HEADSETS - Headsets should reflect the following design requirements:
- (1) Earphone cushioning to provide comfort for extended periods of wear. Earphones should cover the outer ear but without causing uncomfortable pressure.
I NO 20000205 Il-7 (2) Supporting structure for earpieces 0 YES should not impose discomforts of weight, concentrated pressures, or metal contact with the skin. (3) The earpiece should be held 0 YES firmly in place, yet be easy to remove. (4) Ideally, headsets should provide I NO 20000205 11-7 hands-free operation. This may have to be compromised, how-ever, to accommodate a push-to-talk switch in anticipation of possible use in areas of high ambient noise .
- 81
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&. HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 12
- 6.2.1.3b {Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "
~
I~~;
~
~ ~
~ ~
~,
~-7
~
{I
~
~
~
7 {5) Biaural headsets should be avail- N/J. NIA Battery able for use by control room per- powered sonnel when they are required to radios leave the control room for plant areas with high ambient noise levels and communicate with the control room from these areas using sound-powered communi-cation equipment. (6) A well-marked and accessible NIA NIA place should be provided for head-set stowage.
- c. RINGING-(1) Need for ringing must be deter- NIA NIA mined for the individual plant depending on the sound-powered phone procedures.
(2) If ringing is not installed, then the 0 YES user should be provided capability for directly switching the sound-powered transmitter to the paging system so that a desired party can be called to the line.
- d. JACK PROVISIONS -
(1) Plug-in jacks for the sound- 0 YES powered system should be pro-* vided within the control room. (2) Jacks should be located close to 0 YES the work stations to prevent need for unduly long cords. (3) Jacks should not accommodate 0 YES plugs of the conventionally powered phone system, in order to avoid wrong instrument-system connections.
- e. SWITCillNG-(1) The requirements for switching NIA NIA must be assessed for the individual plant depending on procedures for use of sound-powered phones
- 82
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 12
~>~
~
I § I& I ~
,,~
I
- I~
~
§
~ ~
~
&UIOELINE # ~ ~ "
6.2.1.3 e. (Cont'd) (2) Patch panels, when used, should N/A NIA be conspicuously marked and located in reasonably accessible places. These requirements are particularly critical in back-panel areas. (3) A complete set of cords should be N/A N/A provided at each panel if cord-type patching is used. 6.2.1.4 WALKIE-TALKIE TRANSCEIVERS
- a. SOUND QUALITY - Within the engi-neering constraints imposed by radio frequency spectrum availability and by design for easy portability, walkie-talkies should realize the same quality desired throughout all of the com muni-cations systems, namely:
(1) Good frequency response, prefer- 0 YES ably to telephone standards of 200 to 3300 Hz. (2) Sufficient dynamic range and gain 0 YES to handle instantaneous pressures found in speech and develop necessary signal level at the headphone or loudspeaker.
- b. AREA COVERAGE -
(1) Modulation and a radio frequency I NO 20000206 II-7 should be chosen, as FCC regu-lations permit, to provide broad-area walkie-talkie communication to the control room. One consid-era tion for frequency selection should be radio-wave penetration of metal or reinforced concrete barriers, which at certain fre-quencies would tend to attenuate or bounce the signaL
- 83
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 12
- 6.2.l.4b (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "~0&/
~
I
;:s#
~
~
I /1/
~
~
<Iii'
~
{I I (2) Use of walkie-talkies should be 0 YES prohibited in areas close to low_. level analog or digital $1quipment unless EMI noise susceptibility tests have been conducted that demonstrate that equipment is not affected by the frequency bands used.
- c. PACKAGING-(1) To the ex:tent permitted by design 0 YES for effective electrical/RF func-tion, walkie-talkies should be small, light, and easy to carry.
(2) Their use should leave one hand, 0 YES
.and preferably both; available most of the time for other tasks.
(3) The microphone should be inte- 0 YES
- d.
grated into the transceiver pack-age. PARTY IDENTIFICATION - When there are more than two parties on a channel operating at separate locations, procedures must provide for unambig-0 YES uous identification of the speaker.
- e. BATTERY REPLENISHMENT-(1) A supply of fresh replacement 0 YES batteries should be stowed in an.
accessible, well-marked space. (2) The stock should be kept large 0 YES enough to support long periods of continuous operation in case of eme,rgency .
- 84
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 12
- &UIDELINE 6.2.1.S FIXED-BASE UHF TRANSCEIVERS I ;j&/
~
~
I
~
~
$~
I ~I~ I; I , I
~
- a. . SIGNAL QUALITY - Unlike walkie- I NO 20000212 ll-7 talkies, fixed-base UHF transceivers are not constrained by being designed for portability. Therefore, they should readily achieve good voice intelligi-bility, provided by adequate frequency response at least within telephone standards of 200 to 3300 Hz. They should exhibit sufficient dynamic range to handle instantaneous pressures found in speech and develop sufficient gain to develop the necessary signal level at the loudspeaker.
- b. GAIN - Gain should be adjustable, but 0 YES the gain control should be limited so D that even at its lowest setting an aud-ible signal is still presented.
- c. PROCEDURES - Procedures should be 0 YES established (and conspicuously posted) D
- for use of the system .
6.2.1.6 ANNOUNCING SYSTEMS
- a. INTELLIGIBILITY AND COVERAGE -
(1) Intelligibility requires the inte- 0 YES gration of carefully selected com-ponents (microphones, amplifiers, and loudspeakers) into an overall system providing good frequency response in the audio band which is critical for intelligibility. At a minimum, telephone quality is
' required (200 to 3300 Hz); higher intelligibility is achieved by a band of 200 to 6100 Hz.
(2) Coverage depends on loudspeaker I NO 20000207 11-7 location. Adequate coverage requires that speakers should be placed so that they are available in all necessary areas and that there are no "dead spots" within any area. 85
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 12
- 6.2.1.6 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
, I I ///
!tV/! CJ
~
~
-ll'41
~
I
~
c.,* it 41'
~
I
- b. MICROPHONE CHARACTERISTICS -
(1) Frequency response should be 0 YES compatible with that of the rest of the system. (2) If the powered telephone system 0 YES is used tc, provide microphone input to the announcing system, the telephone system should con-* tain transmitters of quality com-patible with that of the announc-ing system. (3) Microphones should have high 0 YES sensitivity to speech signals. . (4) Dynamic range should permit 50 0 YES dB variations in signal input. (5) Microphone input should be pro- 0 YES vided within the control room.
- c. LOUDSPEAKER LOCATION (1) Speakers should be provided in the 0 YES control room and other areas where control room personnel operations might be (e.g., rest-rooms, eating areas, locker rooms, etc.).
(2) Speakers should be placed to yield 0 NO 22A00209 II-5 an intelligible level of signal throughout the area.
- d. SPEECH CLARITY - Since proper 0 YES speech over an announcing system dif-fers from normal conversation, operators should be familiarized with the proper way to speak on the announcing system.
- e. LOUDSPEAKER VOLUME -
(1) Speaker volume should be 0 NO 22A00210 11-5 adjusted to ensure that speaker communications will not prevent detection of auditory alarms . 86
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&. HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 12
- 6.2.1.6e (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
~ ~-; ~/ , I
§&
I I
$ ~
I 111
.~
~
!lj
~
(2) Audio gain controls (if provided) 0 NO 22A00210 II-5 should be limited to preclude reducing volume below an audible level.
- f. PRIORITY - Control room inputs to 0 NO 22A00208 CPT the plant announcing system should have priority over any other input. The control room input should be capable of interrupting an announcement in pro-gress, or of bypassing queued announce-ments.
6.2.1. 7 POINT-TO-POINT INTERCOM SYS-TEMS
- a. INTELLIGIBILITY - At a minimum, M YES the intercom system should provide transmission of the voice spectrum to telephone standards (200 to*3300 Hz) .
- b. GAIN ADJUSTMENT - Gain should be adjustable at each intercom unit, but adjustability should be limited to pre-elude reducing volume below an audible level.
0 YES 6.2.1.8 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
- a. BACKUP EQUIPMENT - Provisions I NO 20000203 11-7 should be made to assure complete 20000204 11-7 internal and external communications 20000205 11-7 capabilities during emergencies. 20000206 II-7 ioooo207 11-7 20000212 II-7
- b. EQUIPMENT USABILITY - Communi- NIA NIA cations equipment should be usable by personnel wearing protective gear with-out impediment to their tasks.
- c. VOICE COMMU.NICATIONS WITH MASKS **,
(1) Emergency face masks should be NIA NIA equipped with diaphragms that are specially designed to transmit speech .
- 87
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 10 of 12
- ""'"" 1/l/~1 /// / /
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __.;.;..;.;;;;;,;;.;;,._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _+-...;.,~-+--..;._-f----jf------~ 6.2.1.Bc (Cont'd) (2) The diaphragms should be able to N/A N/A separate voice from exhaust valve action. (3) If not equipped with diaphragms, N/A N/A masks should be equipped with electronic speech systems which pick up the voice with an internal microphone and transmit it to a loudspeaker attached outside the mask. 6.2.2~1 USE OF AUDITORY SIGNALS
- a. DEDICATED USE - Systems used to 0 YES Annunciator transmit nonverbal auditory signals alarm system
- should be used only for that purpose.
- b. LOCALIZATION - Auditory signals 0 YES should provide localization cues that direct operators to those control room
. work stations where operator attention is required.
- c. SELECTION -
(1) Auditory signals should be 0 YES selected to avoid confusion with ambient control room noises. (2) Auditory signals should be 0 YES selected to avoid interference with other auditory sources, including verbal communication. 6.2.2.2 SIGNAL MEANING
- a. The meaning of each auditory signal 0 NO 22A02906 II-5 should be clear and unambiguous.
- b. Similar auditory signals must not be N/A N/A contradictory in meaning with one another ..
- c. Auditory signals intended to alert the 0 YES operator to a malfunction or failure must be different from routine signals such as bells, buzzers, and normal operating noises.
88
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 11 of 12
- GUIDELINE 6.2.2.3 AUDITORY CODING TECHNIQUES
- a. DISTINCTIVE CODING - Coding 0 YES methods should be distinct and unam-biguous, and should not conflict with other auditory signals.
- b. PULSE CODING - Auditory signals ~/A NIA may be pulse coded by repetition rate, but the number of codes should be limited (2 or 3). Repetition rates should be sufficiently separated to ensure operator discrimination.
- c. FREQUENCY CHANGE CODING -: If IN/A N/A modulation of the frequency (Hz) of a signal denotes information, center fre-quencies should be between 500 and 1000 Hz.
.d. DISCRETE-FREQUENCY CODING - M YES Discrete-frequency codes may be used for audible signal coding. Frequencies should be broad band (!10 O Hz) and widely spaced within the 200-5000 Hz range. No more than 5 separate fre-quencies should be used.
- e. CODING BY INTENSITY - Coding by 0 YES intensity is not recommended.
6.2.2.4 PROPAGATION OF SIGNALS
- a. DIRECTION OF SOUND - Sound 0 YES sources (speakers, buzzers, etc.) should direct sound toward the center of the primary operating area.
- b. AUDIBILITY - Auditory alert and 0 YES warning signals should be audible in all parts of tne control r:oom.
6.2.2.5 FREQUENCY
- a. RANGE - Auditory signal frequencies M YES should be between 200 and 500 Hz. The D optimum frequency range is between 500 and 3000 Hz .
- 89
TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 12 or 12
- 6.2.2.5 (Cont'd IIUIDELINE
- b. BANDWIDTH - Wide-band auditory 0 YES signals of approximately 200 Hz should D be used. '
,I I j
6.2.2.6 SIGNAL INTENSITY
- a. GENERAL - In general, a system M YES capability to develop a signal-to-noise D ratio of 20 dB in at least one octave band between 200. an 5000 Hz should be adequate for all control rooms and environments. This signal-to-noise ratio capability should apply throughout the primary operating area. However, a 20 dB differential may not be neces-sary for all signals and all environ-ments. A normal value of 10 dB(A) above average ambient noise is generally adequate (See Guideline 6.3.2.1.)
- b.
c. COMFORT - Auditory signal intensity should not cause discomfort or "ringing in the ears. MAXIMUM INTENSITY - Auditory signal intensities should not exceed 90 dB(A), except for evacuation signals, 0 M YES NO 22A02905 Il-6 which may be up to 115 dB(A). 6.2.2.7 RELIABILITY
- a. FAILURE OF ALARM CIRCUITRY - 0 YES Failure of auditory signal circuitry should not adversely affect plant equip-ment.
- b. FALSE ALARMS - Auditory alarm 0 YES systems should be designed so that false alarms are avoided.
- c. SYSTEM TEST - Auditory signal sys- 0 YES tem test capabilities should be pro-vided .
- 90
- 3.9 Annunciator Survey This section documents the results of the annunciator survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of* NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan.
3.9.1 Objectives The objectives of the annunciator survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which the annunciator system in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. . Identify and document any features of the annunciator system that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.9.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the annunciator system design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:
- General system design
- Alarm parameter selection
- First-out annunciators
- Prioritization
- Cleared alarms
- Signal detection
- Auditory coding
- Visual annunciator panels
- Visual alarm recognition and identification
- Arrangement of alarm tiles
- Tile legends
- Tile readability
- Annunciator controls
- Annunciator response procedures *.
3.9.3 Criteria The criteria applied in thi~ survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.3.1.1; 6.3.1.2a through d(2); 6.3.1.3a through d; 6.3.1.4a and b; 6.3.1.5a 91
through b(3); 6.3.2.la through f; 6.3.3.la through b(2); 6.3.2.2a and b; 6.3.3.la through c(3); 6.3.3.2a through f(2); 6.3.3.3a through f; 6.3.3.4a through d; 6.3.3.5a through d(6); 6.3.4.la through d(2); 6.3.4.2a through c; 6.3.4.3a and b; 6.5.1.6a through c(2) and e(l) through 3(3); and 6.6.6.2a, b, and _c. 3.9.4 Method 3.9.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data collected during the operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problems in the design or operation of the annunciator system.
- b. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the annunciator task plan.*
- c. Data were collected primarily through measurement and direct obser-vation of the annunciator system in the CR. As necessary, system documentation (e.g., P&IDs, electrical drawings, annunciator response procedures) were reviewed to augment and corroborate observations and _
interviews. 3.9.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:
- a.
- All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the compo-nents or system involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradi~tory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
- c. Upon completion of. all analyses, the criteria of the annunciator task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
3.9.5 Findings The findings of the annunciator survey are presented in Table 3-9, "Annunciator Survey Findings and HEDs Generatect.*i Overall, 98 criteria were applied to the annunciator system in the Surry control room. Of these, 14 (14%) were not applicable, 52 (53%) were in compliance and 32 (3396) were not in compliance. A total of 41 HEDs were generated which document all the 32 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address set points, multi-input annunciators, general alarms, reflash capabiHty, prioritiza-tion, auditory signals, signal detection, visual alarm contract detectability, labeling, out-of-service and blank alarms, silence controls and permanence of demarcation lines. 92
Table 3-9 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment
- meetings. Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED .
- 93
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs-GENERATED Page 1 of 14
- GUIDELINE 6.3.1.1 GENERAL SYSTEM DESIGN
~
~&!
~~ I~
CJ
§
~
~~
I~ ~" ~
;,
~
I ~
,~
I Annunciator warning systems are the primary I NO 20A02920 CPT control room interface to immediately alert the operator to out-of-tolerance changes in plant condition. Annunciator warning sys-terns consist of three major subsystems: (a) an auditory alert subsystem, (b) a visual alarm subsystem, and (c) an operator response subsystem (see Exhibit 6.3-1). Together, these three subsystems should be designed to provide a preferred operational sequence for annunciator warnings as indicated in Exhibit 6.3.2 6.3.1.2 ALARM PARAMETER SELEC"l10N
- a. SET POINTS - The limits or set points for initiating the annunciator warning system should be established to meet the following goals:
(1) Alarms should not occur so fre- I NO 20A02904 I-5 quently as to be considered a nuisance by the operators. (2) However, set points should be I NO 20A02907 II-7 established to give operators 20A02908 II-7 adequate time to respond to the* 20A02909 Il-7 warning condition before a serious 20A02910 II-7 problem develops. 20A02911 CPT 22A01704 1-2 22A02919 CPT
- b. GENERAL ALARMS -
(1) Alarms that require the control I NO 20A02912 Ill-9 room operator to direct an auxil- 20A02913 11-6 iary operator to a given plant 20A02914 11-6 location for specific information 20A02916 11-7 should be avoided. (2) If general alarms must be used I NO 20A02912 III-9
- they should only be used for con- 20A02913 11-6 ditions that allow adequate time 20A02914 11-6 for auxiliary operator action and 20A02916 Il-7 subsequent control room operator action .
- 94
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 14
- 6.3.1.2 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE Ii~&/~ JI
~
h (1
~
§
~ ,
~~
~
~ ~
'1
~
~
7 ~
~
I
- c. MULTICHANNEL OR SHARED ALARMS-(1) Annunciators with inputs from D YES more than one plant parameter set point should be avoided.
Multi-input alarms that sum-marize single-input annunciators elsewhere in the control room are an exception. (2) Where multi-input annunciators 0 NO 22A02123 Il-5 must be used, an alarm printout capability should be provided. The specifics of the alarm should be printed on an alarm typer with sufficient speed and buffer stor-age to capture all alarm data. (3) A reflash capability should be 0 NO 20002121 Il-5 provided to allow subsequent alarms to activate the auditory alert mechanism and reflash the visual tile even though the first alarm may not have been cleared.
- d. MULTI-UNIT ALARMS ~
(1) Alarms for any shared plant sys- N/A N/A terns should be duplicated in all control rooms. (2) When an item of shared equip- 'N/ A N/A ment is being operated from. one control room a status display or signal should be provided in all. other control rooms which could potentially control this equip-* ment. 6.3.1.3 FIRST OUT ANNUNCIATORS
- a. REACTOR SYSTEM -
(1) A separate first out panel should 0 YES Demarcated; shows be provided for the reactor sys- as red tern .
- 95
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 3 o! 14 V//
"~ ,-- ,,~ ~~;
- 6.3.1.3a (Cont'd)
SUIDELINE
~ ~ ~
I ~ I 41:' (2) The first out panel should consist I YES of separate annunciator tiles for. each of the automatic reactor trip functions. I (3) In the event of a reactor trip, the I YES tile associated with the event should illuminate, and no other.
- b. TURBINE-GENERATOR SYSTEM - A 0 YES separate first out panel, similar in function to the reactor system panel, is recommended.
- c. POSmON - First out panels should be 0 YES located directly above the main control work station for the system.
- d. APPLICATION ,- First out annuncia- 0 YES tors should conform to the general auditory, visual, and opera tor response*
guidelines of this section . 6.3.1.4 PRIORITIZATION A. LEVELS OF PRIORITY - (1) Prioritization should be accom- I NO 20A02901 III-8 plished using a relatively small 20A02125 11-5 (2-4) number of priority levels. (2) Prioritization should be based on I NO 20A02125 11-5 a continuum of importance, 20A02901 III-8 severity, or need for operator action in one or more dimensions, e.g., likelihood of reactor trip, release of radiation. Exhibit 6.3-3 provides an example of prioritization based on three levels of prioritization.
- 96
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 14
- 6.3.1.4 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE #
~~&! I. I
§
~
~
~ ,
~ ~
~
J
~
G
~
ii
~
~
I
- b. PRIORITY CODING -
(1) Some method for coding the vis- 0 YES ual signals for the various priority I levels should be employed. Acceptable methods for priority coding include color, position, shape, oi: symbolic coding. (2) Auditory signal coding for priority NIA NIA level is also appropriate. See Guideline 6.2.2.3 for recom-mended coding techniques. 6.3.1.5 CLEARED ALARMS
- a. AUDITORY SIGNAL - Cleared alarms I NO 20A02903 II-5 should have a dedicated, distinctive 23A09217 II-5 audibie signal which should be of finite duration.
- b. VISUAL SIGNAL - The individual tile 0 YES should have one of the following:
(1) A special flash rate (twice or one-half the .normal flash rate is preferred, to allow discrimina-tion), or (2) Reduced brightness, or (3) A special color, consistent with the overall control room color coding scheme, produced by a differently colored bulb behind the tile. 6.3.2.1 SIGNAL DETECTION
- a. INTENSITY - The signal should be such that operators can reliably discern the sjgnal above the ambient control M YES room noise. A nominal value of 10 dB(A) above average ambient noise is generally adequate.
- 97
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 14
- 6.3.2.1 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE !iY./7 ~ 7 ,
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
¥~
I
~
~
/!
~
~ ~
~
I
- b. CONTROL - Signal intensity, if NIA N/A adjustable, should be controlled by D administrative procedure.
C, LIMITS - The signal should capture the I NO 20A02902 11-5 operator's attention but should not cause irritation or a startled reaction.
- d. DETECTION - Each auditory signal 0 YES should be adjusted to result in approxi- I mately equal detection levels at normal operator work stations in the primary operating area.
- e. RESET - The annunciator auditory 0 YES alert mechanism should automatically reset when it has been silenced.
- f. IDENTIFICATION - The operator 0 YES should be able to identify the work I station or the system where the audi-tory alert signal originated. Separate auditory signals at each work station within the primary operating area are recommended.
6.3.2.2 AUDITORY CODING 8; LOCALIZATION (1) Auditory coding techniques should I YES be used when the operator work station associated with the alarm is not in the primary operating area. (2) Coded signals from a single audio source should not be used to ~IA NIA identify individual work stations within the primary operating area;
- b. PRIORITIZATION - Coding may be I NO 20A02901 ~11-8 used to indicate alarm priority. (See Guideline 6.3.1.4.)
- 98
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 14
- GUIDELINE 6.3.3.1 VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANE~
I
~
y;~J
~
s~ 11
~
$ ~"
*~ ~I ~
~
~
I ~ Cl:'
,~
I
- a. LOCATION - Visual alarm panels 0 NO 20002103 CPT should be located above the related controls and displays which ar.e required for corrective or diagnostic liction in response to the alarm. (See Exhibit 6.3-4.)
- b. LABELING-(1) Each panel should be identified by 0 YES a label ab_ove the panel.
(2) Panel identification label height M YES should be consistent with a sub-tended visual angle of a least 15 minutes when* viewed from a cen-tral position within the primary operating area. 6.3.3.2 VISUAL ALARM RECOG AND
!DENT
- a.
b. FLASHING - The specific tile(s) on an annunciator panel should use flashing illumination to indicate an alarm cori-dition. FLASH RATE - Flash rates should be from three to five flashes per second 0 M YES YES with approximately equal on and off times.
- c. FLASHER FAIL URE - In case of 0 YES flasher failure of an alarmed tile, the tile light should illuminate and burn steadily.
- d. CONTRAST DETECTABILITY - There 0 NO 20002122 II-5 should be high enough contrast between alarming and steady-on tiles, and between illuminated and nonilluminated tiles~ so that operators in a normally illuminated control room have no pro-blem discriminating alarming, steady-on, and steady-off visual tiles.
- 99
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 'I of 14
/J~*; I $/ ~I I 7
- 6.3.3.2 (Cont'd)
IIUIDHINE ~ I I ~ I ~
~
;
- e. "DARK" ANNUNCIATOR PANEIS - A I NO 20A02102 ll-5 "dark" annunciator panel concept should be used This means that under normal operating conditions no annunciators would be illuminated; all of the visual tiles of the annunciator panels would be "dark."
- r. EXTENDED DURATION ILLUMINA- I NO 20A02104 CPT TION - If an annunciator tile must be "ON" for an extended period,during normal operations (e.g., during equip-ment repair or replacement), it should be:
(1) Distinctively coded for positive 0 NO 20002120 ll-5 recognition during this period, and (2) Controlled by administrative D YES procedures. I 6.3.3.3 ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES
- a. MATRIX ORGANIZATION - Visual 0 YES alarms should be organized as a matrix of visual alarm tiles within each annun-ciator panel
- b. FUNCTIONAL GROUPING - Visual D YES alarm tiles should be grouped by func-tion or system within each annunciator panel For example area radiation alarms should be grouped on one panel, not spread throughout the control room.
- c. LABELING OR AXF.S -
(1) The vertical and horizontal axes 0 NO 22A02107 m-s of annunciator panels should be
- labeled with alphanumerics for ready coordinate designation of a particular visual tile .
- 100
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 14
- 6.3.3.3c (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "y;~;
~
~
#~
§
~
~ ~
,~ ~~ ~
~
~
I I JI
~
I (2) Coordinate designation is 0 YES preferred on the left and top sides of the annunciator panel, (3) Letter height for coordinate 0 NO 22A02108 III-8 designation should be consistent with a subtended visual angle of at least 15 minutes as viewed from a central position within the primary operating area.
- d. PA'ITERN RECOGNITION -
(1) The number of alarm tiles and the 0 NO 22A02110 Il-5 matrix density should be kept low (a maximum of 50 tiles per matrix is suggested). (2) Tiles within an annunciator panel D YES matrix should be grouped by sub-system, function, or other logical organization .
- e. OUT-OF-SERVICE ALARMS - Cues I NO 20A02124 CPT for prompt recognition of an out-of-service annunciator should be designed into the system.
- f. BLANK TILES - Blank or unused 0 NO 22A02109 CPT annunciator tiles should not be illumi-nated (except during annunciator testing) 6.3.3.4 VISUAL TILE LEGENDS
- a. UNAMBIGUOUS - Annunciator visual I NO 20A02106 Il-5 tile legends should be specific and unambiguous. Wording should be in concise, short messages.
- b. SINGULARITY - Alarms which refer I YES the operator to another, more detailed annunciator panel located outside the primary operating area should be mini-mized .
101
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 14
- 6.3.3.4 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "
~
I! yj &/
~
I
;::
~
~~
I
~
~ ~
(!
~
~
I #
'f
~
g,. I
- c. SPECIFICITY - Tile legends should 0 NO 22A02111 Il-5 address specific conditions; for exam-ple, do not use one alarm for HIGH-LOW, TEMPERATURE-PRESSURE.
6.3.3.5 VISUAL ffLE READABILITY
- a. DISTANCE - The operator should be able to read all the annunciator tiles from the position at the work station where the annunciator acknowledge control is located.
(1) Letter height should subtend a 0 NO 22A02112 II-5 minimum visual angle of 15 min-utes, or .004 x viewing distance. The preferred visual angle is 20 minutes, or .006 x viewing dis-tance. (2) Letter height should be identical M YES for all tiles, based on the maxi:.. mum viewing distance. Separate calculations should be made for stand-up and sit-down work sta-tions.
- b. TYPE STYLE - The size and style of
. lettering should. meet the following:
(1) Type styles should be simple. 0 YES (2) Type styles should be consistent 0 YES on all visual tiles. (3) Only upper -case type should be 0 YES used on visual tiles.
- c. LEGEND CONTRAST - Legends should provide high contrast with the tile background.
(1) Legends should be engraved. 0 NO 22A02126 CPT (2) Legends should be dark lettering 0 YES on a light background ..
- 102
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 10 of 14
- 6.3.3.5 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "
~
~
~~!
~
~,
~ ...
~
~ ~
CJ
~
~
I ~ E
~
I
- d. LETTER DIMENSIONS AND SP AC-ING -
(1) Stroke-width-to-character-height M YES ratio should be between 1:6 and 1:8. (2) Letter width-to-height ratio M YES should be between 1:1 and 3:5. (3) Numeral width-to-height ratio 0 NO 22A02114 11-5 should be 3:5. (4) Minimum space between charac- M YES ters should be one stroke width. (5) Minimum space between words* M YES should be the width of one char-acter. (6) Minimum space between lines 0 NO 22A02115 II-5 should be one...:half the character
- (1) height.
6.3.4.1 CONTROIS (See Exhibit 6~3-5.)
- a. SILENCE -
Each set of operator response 0 NO 22A02116 Il-5 controls should include a silence I 20B03005 Il-5 control. (2) It should be possible to silence an I NO 20B03005 Il-5 auditory alert signal from any set of annunciator response controls in the primary operating area.
- b. "ACKNOWLEDGE (1) A control should be provided to 0 YES terminate the flashing of a visual
. tile and have it continue at steady illumination until the alarm is cleared.
- 103
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 11 of 14
- 6.3.4.1 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE I ~&/ !17
~
I
;:;#
$~
I
~
.~
l! I (2) Acknowledgement should be pos- I YES sible only at the work station where the alarm originated. C, RESET (1) If an automatic cleared alarm 0 YES feature is not provided, a control should be provided to reset the system after an alarm has cleared. (2) The reset control should silence I YES any audible signal indicating clearance and should extinguish tile illumination. (3) The reset control should be effec- I YES tive only at the work station for the annunciator panel where the alarm initiated .
- d. TEST (1) A control to test the auditory signal and flashing illumination of all tiles in a panel should be pro-vided.
I YES (2) Periodic testing of annunciators* I YES should be required and controlled by administrative procedure. 6.3.4.2 CONTROL SET DESIGN
- a. POSITIONING OF REPETITIVE 0 YES GROU~ -'- Repetitive groups of annunciator controls should have the same arrangement and relative location at different work stations. This is to facilitate i'blind" reaching.
- b. CONTROL CODING - Annunciator 0 YES response controls should be coded for easy recognition using techniques such as:
104
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 12 of 14
- ""'"" 1/l/~1 Ill I /
_.,;_______,:::::::::::::...______~~-+-....;_+-_.:,_...;....-f-~+-------; 6.3.4.2b. (Cont'd) (1) Color coding; 0 YES (2) color shading the group 1 of annun- N/A N/A 1 ciator controls; (3) demarcating the group of annun- 0 YES ciator controls; or (4) shape coding, particularly the 0 NO 22A02117 CPT silence control. (See Exhibit 6.3-5, Ex!imple 2.) -
- c. NONDEFEATABLE CONTROLS - 0 YES Annunciator control designs should not.
allow the operator to defeat the con-trol. For example, some pushbuttons used for annunciator silencing and acknowledgement can be held down by inserting a coin in the ring around the pushbutton. This undesirable design feature should be eliminated .
- 6.3.4.3 ANNUCIATOR R~PONSE PROCEDURES
- a. AN AILABILITY - Annunciator response procedures should be available in the control room.
0 YES
- b. INDEXING - Annunciator response 0 YES procedures should be indexed by panel identification and annunciator tile coordinates.
6;5.1.6 COLOR -CODING
- a. REDUNDANCY - In all applications of N/A N/A Color coding is color. coding, color should provide covered in Section redundant information. That is, the 3.13, Conventions.
pertinent information should be avail- See 6.5.1.6 in Tabl b able from*some other cue in addition to 3-13. color.. 105
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 13 of 14
- 6.5.1.6 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "
~
~
it, j'~/1 g; II I
,;s
~I
~ ..
~
8>
~ ~
C,j
~
IS!~ I .~
~
~
I
- b. NUMBER OF COLORS -
(1) The number of colors used for NIA NIA coding should be kept to the mini-mum needed for providing suffi-cient information. (2) The number of colors used for NIA NIA coding should not exceed 11.
- c. MEANING OF COLORS -
(1) The meaning attached to a partic- NIA NIA *, ular color should be narrowly defined. (2) Red, green, and amber (yellow) NIA NIA should be reserved for the fol-lowing uses: Red: unsafe, danger, immediate operator action required, or an indication that a critical para-meter is out of tolerance. Green: safe, no operator action required, or an indication that a parameter is within tolerance. Amber (yellow): hazard {poten-tially unsafe), caution, attention required, or an indication that a marginal value or parameter exists.
- e. PRINCIPLES OF COLOR SELECTION (1) The primary principle which NIA NIA should be applied in selecting colors for coding purposes which do not have the immediate safety implications of red, green, and amber is to ensure that each color
- is recognized as different from any other. Exhibit 6.5-7 lists 22 colors of maximum contrast.
Each successive color has been selected so that it will contrast maximally with the color just preceding it and satisfactorily with earlier colors in the list. The first 9 colors have been
- 106
TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 14 of 14
- 6.5.l.6d(l) (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE I selected so as to yield satisfac-tory contrast for red-green defi-cient as well as color-normal observers. The remaining 13 colors are useful only for color-normal observers. (2) Colors selected for coding should N/A N/A contrast well with the background on which they appear. (3) Ambient lighting in the area in N/A N/A which color coding is used will influence the apparent color of the coded element (especially for surface colors). Each color selected for coding should be evaluated under all illumination conditions under which it is used. 6.6.6.2 DEMARCATION
- a. USE -
used to: (1) (2) Lines of demarcation can be Enclose functionally related dis-plays. Enclose functionally related con-0 YES 0 YES trols (3) Group related controls and dis- 0 YES plays.
- b. CONTRAST - Lines of demarcation 0 YES should be visually distinctive from the panel background. - i
- c. PERMANENCE - Lines of demarca- 0 NO 22A02127 III-8
.tion should be permanently attached .
- 107
3.10 Controls Survey This section documents the results of the controls survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.10.1 Objectives / The objectives of the controls survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which all controls in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify and document any features of the controls that do not conform to the criter.ia in NUREG-0700.
3.10.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the control design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The control topics evaluated include: General principles of control design Prevention of accidental activation Direction of movement Coding of controls
- Pushbutton design
- Round pushbuttons
- Legend pushbuttons
- Rotary selector controls
- J-handle controls
- Continuous adjustment rotary controls
- Thumbwheels
- Slide switches
- Toggle switches
- Separation of controls.
Several NUREG-0700 guidelines appropriate to controls were addressed as part of task analysis and task verification and validation activities. These have, therefore, been incorporated lnto the verification and validation evaluation reports
- 108
3.10.3 Criteria
- The criteria appli~d in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.4.1.la(l) through c(2) and e(l) through e(3); 6.4.1.2a through g; 6.4.2.1; 6.4.2.2c(l} through c(4), e and f(l) through f(3); 6.4.3.lb and c; 6.4.3.2a(l) through d; 6.4.3.3.b(l), (2), (4), (5) and d(l) through e(5); 6.4.4.la; 6.4.4.2a(l) through b; 6.4.43a
- througn g(3); 6.4.4.4a through e(5); 6.4.4.5a through f; 6.4.5.la through d(2)(e); 6.4.5.2a through b(2); 6.4.5.3a through c(6); 6.4.5a(l) through e(4); 6.5.L6a through c(2) and d(3) through e(3); and 6.8.3.la through c.
The detailed definitions for ea.ch criterion are presented in Table 3-10.
- 3.10.4 Method 3.10.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data collected during operator interviews were reviewed to identify potential problems in the design, location, or operation of CR controls.
- b. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the Controls Task Plan. The majority of the data were collected through interviews with CR operators and direct observation of controls. in the CR. As necessary, measurements were made of the physical characteristics (e.g., size, separation, displacement of the controls) *
- 3.10.4.2 Analysis -
a. Data were analyzed according to the fallowing procedure: All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the control or controls involved (e.g., rotary controls, pushbuttons, J-handle con-trols, etc.), a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution. b~ The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant p~ant personnel.
- c. - Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the controls task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
3.10.5 Findings The findings of the controls survey are presented in Table 3-10, "Controls Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 149 criteria were applied to the controls in the Surry control room. Of these, 34 (23%) were not applicable, 80 (54%) were in compliance, _ and 35 (24%) were not in compliance. A total of 57 HEDs were generated which document
- 109
all of the 35 criteria that were not met. In general, those REDs address accidental
- activation of controls, inconsistent direction of movement, moveable covers, coding of controls, and pushbutton resistance.
Table 3-10 also includes the category assigned to each RED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an RED. {
- 110
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 19
- GUIDELINE 6.4.1.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES
/J~! .Ill
~
I!
~
~
I
~
itJI
~ 41' 4!
~
q,
~
- a. ADEQUACY-(1) It should provide a sufficient 0 NO 23003046 Il-6 range of control. 23003047 1-4 23003052 Il-7 23A03068 Il-5 23A03214 1-5 23¥03202 IIl-9 (2) It should be easily adjusted with I NO 20A03013 1-1 the required level of precision. 23A03210 11-6 23A03211 Il-7 23A03212 Il-7
- b. ECONOMY -
(1) There should be a good reason to I NO 20A03009 Il-7 require a control for the function 20A03044 III-9 concerned. 20A03045 III-9 20A03053 11-7 22A01213 Ill-9 23A06801 II-6 (2) Duplication of controls should not I NO 20A03010 III-9 occur, except for a specific reason. (3) The precision and range of a con- 0 YES trol should not greatly exceed the need. ( 4) Selected controls should be 0 YES economic of space. c: HUMAN SUITABILITY - (1) Each control should be recogniz- 0 NO 23A03213 Il-6 . able in terms of its function. (2) Each control should be of the type I NO 20A03011 11-6 normally ,anticipated for the 20A03032 III-9
- operation concerned. This means 20A03033 11-5 conforming to operator expectati-ans, matching to other controls for the same function, and ' .,
generally conforming to conven-tional practice . 111
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 o! 19
- IUIDELINE !ti//
I I $~ 1/// ~ ~
'ii' I
~
I 6.4.1.le. (Cont'd)
- e. DURABIIJTY -
(1) Broken, chipped, or crumbled 0 NO 22A06301 I-5 control surfaces should not ordi-narily occur. (2) Control knobs or handles should I NO 20A03012 CPT not rotate, slip, or move loosely on their shafts. (3) No internal wear or breakage I NO 20A03012 CPT should occur which alters the "feel" or other sensory feedback of a controL Controls should not develop internal looseness, binding, or backlash. 6.4.1.2 PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATION
- a. PROPER LOCATION - Controls 0 NO 22A03035 CPT should be located and oriented so that the opera tor is not likely to strike or move them accidentally in any sequence of control movements.
- b. FIXED PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES -
(1) Controls may be recessed, 0 YES shielded, or otherwise surrounded by physical barriers. (See Exhibit 6.4-1) (2) The control should be entirely 0 YES contained within the envelope described by the recess or barrier.
- c. MOVABLE COVERS OR GUARDS -
(1) Controls may be covered or I NO 20B03006 III-7 guarded with movable (e.g., hinged) barriers. (See Exhibit 6.4-2) (2) Safety or lock wires should not be 0 IYES used .
- 112
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 3 or 19
- 6.4.1.2 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
~~&!
~ ~
I.
~
~
~ I
~*
~
~ ~
t1
~
II I ~ Cl'
~
I (3) When the guard is in the open I NO 20B03006 III-7 position, it should-not interfere with the operation of the guarded control or other adjacent con-trols.
- d. INTERLOCKING CONTROLS - Con-trols may be provided with interlocks so that:
(1) Extra movement is required (e.g., I NO 20A03008 III-9 a side movement out of a detent 20A03043 III-9 position or a pull-to-engage clutch). (2) Prior operation of a related or I NO 20A03008 IIl-9 locking control is required. 20A03043 III-9
- e. RESISTANCE TO MOVEMENT-Con- I ~o 20A03060 CPT trols should be provided with resistance '*
.* (e.g., friction or spring-loading), so that distinct or sustained effort is required for activation.
- f. SEQUENTIAL ACTIVATION - When a I ~o 20B03401 III-9 strict sequential activation is neces-sary, controls should be provided with
. locks to prevent the controls from passing through a position. Further movement should require a new control
-action.
- g. CHOICE OF ACTION - Rotary action I ~o 20A03_007 11-5 controls should be used in situations 20A03039 1-4 where linear or pushbutton c~mtrols 20A03051 II-6 would be subject to inadvertent activa- 20A03069 II-6
- tion, and fixed protective structures 20A03070 CPT are impractical or inappropriate. 20A03071 III-9 20A03072 II-7 20A03073 II-6 6.4.2.1 DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT To minimize operator error, control movements should conform to the following -,
population stereotypes (for U.S. population only):
- a. ON, START, RUN, OR OPEN - Up, 0 NO 20A03049 Il-7 right, forward, clockwise, or pull. 22A03601 Il-6 23A03102 11-6 113
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 19
- 6.4.2.1 {Cont'd)
GUIDELINE Ill/!
~
~
!!5 I
I
,;:;
, Ill ,,
~
~
~
I b .. OFF, STOP, CLOSE - Down, left, 0 YES backward, counterclockwise, or push. I
- c. RIGHT {AS A FUNCTION). "4' Clockwise . NIA NIA or right.-
- d. LEFT (AS A FUNCTION) -Counter- NIA NIA clockwise or left.
- e. RAISE - Up. 0 YES
- f. LOWER - Do.wn. 0 YES
- g. INCREASE - Forward, up, right, or 0 YES cl_ockwise.
- h. DECREASE - Backward, down, left, or 0 YES counterclockwise.
6.4.2.2 CODING OF CONTROLS C, SIZE CODING (1) No more than three different I NO 20A03011 II-6 sizes of controls should be used 20A03032 III-9 for discrimination by absolute 20A03033 II-5 size. (2) Controls used for performing the 0 YES same function on different items of equipment should be the same size. (3) When knob d1ameter is used as a I NO 20A03011 II-6 coding parameter, differences 20A03032 III-9 between diameters should be at 20A03033 II-5 least o.~ inch. (4) When knob thickness is a coding NIA NIA parameter, differences between thicknesses should be at least 0.4
. inch.
- d. SHAPE CODING - When possible, controls should be differentiated by shape. In particular, controls which may be manipulated in a "blir:id" fashion should be shape coded. For example, where an operator must simultaneously observe a display and move a control 114
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 19
- 6.4.2.2 (Cont'd) 1 8 5
---------_;;G.;,;Ul;.:DE;,;;ll;.:.;NE;___ _..;.__ _ _ _ _.,._. .;#:.. ~~~-,;. l_+/.--°".;..IJ__;./_-+~-~;;..#_+/-*
___,_,_~__--1/ which is outside his field of view, the controls should be shape-coded and separated by distance. Control shapes should be: (1) Visually identifiable. 0 YES (2) ractually identifiable. 0 YES
- e. ROTATING KNOB SHAPE OPTIONS - 0 YES Rotating knob controls for different types of control actions should be dis-tinguishable by sight and touch and not easily confused with each *other.
Exhibits 6.4-4 through 6.4-6 give examples of 15 suitable knob designs developed for three major classes of knobs, each class intended for a dif-ferent purpose: multiple rotation, frac-tional rotation, and detent positioning.
- f. COLOR CODING (1) Color coding should follow the 0 YES recommendations of Guideline 6.5.1.6.
(3) The color of the control should 0 YES contrast with the panel bac~- ground. (See Guideline 6.1.5.6.e) 6.4.3.1 PUSHBUTTON DP.SIGN PRINCIPLES
- b. INDICATION OF ACTIVATION - To ensure that the operator knows that a I NO 20A03402 II-6 pushbutton has been pressed far enough 20A03405 11-5 for activation, a positive indication 20A03406 II-5 should be provided in the form of a snap 20A03407 II-5 feel, an audible click, or an integral 20A03408 1-2 light.
- c. PUSHBUTTON SURF ACE - For best 0 YES operation, the surface of a pushbutton should offer slip resistance, or be con-cave .
115
TABLE 3-10 CONTRO~ SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 19
- § !iii~!/ ~~,;
I ~~ CJf § l *! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.....:,G::,UID::E::,LIN:,:E~---------1-_.:""'-+-:..,_+--..,..;._..;;""_+-.....;;~f----""----; 6.4.3.2 ROUND PUSHBUTTONS (See Exhibit 6.4-7)
- a. Diameter (D), for fingertip operation (inches)
(1) Unguarded and nonrecessed push- M YES buttons Minimum 0.385 (2) Guarded or recessed pushbuttons M .!YES Minimum 0. 75
- b. Diameter (D), for thumb or heel of hand M YES operation (inches)
Minimum 0. 75
- c. Displacement (A), for thumb or finger M !YES operation (inches)
Minimum 0.125
- d. Resistance (R), for fingertip operation M INO 22A03409 III-9 (ounces)
Minimum 10 Maximum 40 6.4.3.3 LEGEND PUSHBUTI'ONS
- a. DISCRIMIN ABILITY - Legend N/A NIA Covered in pushbuttons should be readily Section 3.11, distinguishable from legend lights. This Displays. See may be achieved by distinctive shape, 6.5.3.3c in Table labeling, location, or other techniques. 3-11.
(See also Guideline 6.5.3.3)
- b. LEGEND (1) The legend should be readable 0 NO 22A03404 III-9 under ambient light conditions, with or without internal illumina-tion.
(2) The illuminated condition should 0 NO 22A03410 1-5
. be clearly recognizable under the highest predicted ambient light condition and should be at least 10% brighter than the surrounding panel.
(3) Legend lettering and contrast should conform to recommenda-tions for legend lights (Guideline 6.5.3.3) . 0 YES 116
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 19
- 6.4.3.3b. (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE Ill/! ~-7 ., 7
~
~
;Ji; #
'1
~
~
Jf~ I~
~
~
~
~
(4) The legend message should be 0 YES specific, unambiguous, and con-
- cise.
(5) The legend message should con- 0 NO 22A03403 Ill-9 tain no more than three lines of lettering.
- d. BARRIERS (1) Barriers should be used when 0 NO 22A03411 CPT legend pushbuttons are contigu-ous.
(2) Barriers should have rounded 0 YES edges.
- e. LEGEND PUSHBUTTON DIMENSIONS - For maximum effec-tiveness of legend pushbutton controls, the following dimensions should be used (see Exhibit 6.4.8):
(1) Size (S) (inches) M YES Minimum 0. 75 Maximum 1.5 (2) Displacement (A) (inches) M YES Minimum O (touch plate). Minimum 0.125 (all others) Maximum 0.250 (3) Barrier width (Bw) (inches) '.VI YES Minimum 0.125 (4) Barrier depth (Ba) (inches) M YES Minimum 0.183 Maximum 0.250 (5) Resistance (ounces) M YES Minimum 10 (except touch plate)
. Maximum 40 117
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 19 I 0~1I , / ~~; , I
, :t!! ~ ~ ~
~
IUIDELINE I 6.4.4.1 ROTARY CONTROL DESIGN PRIN-CIPLF.S
- a. DIRECTION OF ACTIVATION -Rotary 0 YES control settings should increase in value with a clockwise rotation.
6.4.4.2 .J-HANDLES
- a. HIGH-TORQUE DESIGNS - J-handles should conform to dimensions as follows (see Exhioit 6.4-9):
(1) Length (L) (inches) M YES Minimum 3. 75 Optimum 4.0 (2) Clearance (C) (inches) M YES Minimum LO Optimum 2.0
- b. LOW-TORQUE DESIGNS - For certain I NO 20A03201 Ill-9 purposes, smaller scale J-handles may be used. In such cases the handle pro-
- portion usually has a flattened or flared tip for finger placement, and the clear-ance between handle and panel surface can be less.
6.4.4.3 KEY-OPERATED CONTROLS
- a. USE - Key-operated controls should be 0 NO 22A03207 II-7 used when system requirements dictate 0 22A03208 II-6 that the function being controlled M 23A03048 II-7 should be secured against activation by unauthorized personnel If key-operated controls cannot be justified in terms of security, they are probably not necessary and should not be used. Key-operated switches should not be used solely as a means of shape coding.
- b. TEETH: SINGLE ROW - Keys with a 0 YES single row of teeth should be inserted into the lock with the teeth pointing up or forward .
- 118
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 19
- CUIDELIIIIE
/JV/!
~. I $/ ~~;
I ~ ~ I _,I 6.4.4.3 (Cont'd)
- c. TEETH: DOUBLE ROW - If keys have N/A N/A teeth on both edges, they should fit the lock with either side up or forward.
\
- d. ON-OFF ORIENTATION - Locks 0 NO 22A03040 CPT should be oriented so that the switch is OFF (or SAFE) when the key is in the .
vertical position.
- e. KEY REMOVAL - Operators should 0 YES not normally be able to remove the key from the lock unless the switch is turned to the OFF or SAFE position.
f'. LABELING - Control positions should M YES be labeled.
- g. KEY-OPERATED CONTROL DIMENSIONS - The following dimen-sions should be used for key-operated controls (see Exhibit 6.4-10) .
- (1)
(2) Displacement (A) (degrees) Minimum soo Maximum 900 Height (H) (inches) Minimum 0.5 Maximum 3.0 M M YES YES (3) Resistance (inch/pounds) N/A N/A Minimum 1.0 Maximum 6.0 6.4.4.4 CONTINUOUS ADJUSTMENT 0 NO 22A03050 II-7 ROTARY CONTROLS - To ensure precise control along a continuous variable, con-
- tinuous adjustment rotary controls are appro-priate.
- a. KNOBS - Knobs for continuous adjust- 0 YES *
- I ment controls should be round in shape, with knurled or serrated edges.
119
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 10 or 19
- 6.4.4.4 {Cont'd) .
GUIDELINE I
- b. POSITION INDICATION - When an 0 YES indication of position is desirable, the pointer configurations shown jn Exhibit 6.4-11 may be used. Where more accuracy is required, a line should be engraved {and filled with contrasting pigment) both on top and down the side of the pointer, as shown on the knob at the bottom of the exhibit.
- c. DIMENSIONS (1) Fingertip grasp knobs should con-form to the following dimensions:
(a) Height (inches) M YES Minimum 0.5
- viaximum 1.0 (b) Diameter (inches) M YES Minimum 0.375 Maximum 4.0 (2) Thumb and forefinger encircled M YES knobs should conform to the following dimensions:
Diameter (inches)
- vlinimum 1.0 Maximum 3.0
- d. TORQUE - Knob torque should be M YES within the range of 4.5 to 6.0 inch/ounces.
- e. CONTINUOUS ADJUSTMENT ROTARY CONTROLS WITH KNOB SKIRTS - If knob skirts are used, such controls should conform to approximately the
- following dimensions. See Exhibit 6.4-12.
(1) . Skirt diameter (Ds): 2.0 inches. M YES (2) Skirt height (Hs): 0.25 inch. M YES 120
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 11 of 19
- 6.4.4.4e. (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE I (3) Finger stop diameter (Dp): 1.25 M YES inches. (4) Finger stop height (Hp) plus M YES rotary knob height (HK): total
- 0. 75 inch.
(5) Knob diameter (DK): 0.'/5 inch. M YES 6.4.4.5 ROTARY SELECTOR CONTROLS
- a. SELECTION - Rotary selector con- 0 YES trols should be used when three or more -
detented positions are required, and may be used for two-detented position operation.
- b. POSITIONING (1) To ensure proper positioning of a I !YES discrete rotary control, detents
- should be provided at each control position .
(2) It should not be possible to posi- I !YES tion a control between detented positions. (3) A maximum of 24 positions should I !YES be used on a rotary selector con-trol. (4) To minimize the possibility of 0 YES placing a rotary selector control in an unused position, stops should be provided at the limits of the control range.
- c. READABILITY - To maximize read- 0 !YES ability, rotary controls should have a moving pointer and fixed position settings.
- 121
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 12 of 19
- 6.4.4.5 (Cont'd) d.
GUIDELINE POSITION INDICATION
~
~
i::
~
~
~b ii g;:f 4i:)
~ ~
I~ /// ~
~
~
ii
't'
~
{I (1) Position indication should be pro- 0 INO 20A03204 III-8 vided. Desirable alternatives are: (a) lllumina ted indicator lights, 0 YES (b) A line engraved both on the 0 !YES top of the knob and down the side, or (c) A pointer shape. 0 !YES (2) It should not be possible to con- 0 INO 22A03203 III-9 fuse the position of the knob in reference to position markers on the panel. To minimize the prob-lem of parallax, pointers on knobs should be mounted close to the . settings to which they point.
- e. DIMENSIONS - Recommended dimen-sions for rotary selector switches are as follows (see Exhibit 6.4-13):
(1) Length (L) (inches) M ~ES Minimum 1.0 (2) Width (W) (inches) M IYES Maximum 1.0 (3) Diameter (D) (inches) M !YES Minimum 1.0 (4) Depth (H) (inches) :v'I YES Minimum 0.625 (5) Resistance (inch/pounds) M !YES Minimum 1.0 Maximum 6.0
- 122
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 13 of 19
- 6.4.4.5 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE 1'/7 I
- f. MOMENTARY CONTACT ROTARY 0 NO 20A03205 CPT SELECTOR CONTROLS - Knobs for spring-loaded momentary contact rotary selector controls should be large enough to be easily held against the spring torque, without fatigue, for as long as necessary to accomplish the control action.
6.4.5.1 THUMBWHEELS
- a. VISIBILITY - To minimize error, N/A N/A thumbwheel readouts should be visible from the thumbwheel operating posi-tion.
- b. CODING - If the thumbwheel is used N/A N/A as an input device, the OFF, zero, or normal position should be coded to facilitate visual recognition of status.
- c. CONTINUOUS ADJUSTMENT THUMB-WHEELS - The dimensions of thumb-wheel controls which permit continuous adjustment (riot stepped or detented) should be as follows:
(1) At least 1 inch of the wheel M YES
. should be exposed to permit easy manipulation.
(2) Resistance should be between 3 M YES and 6 ounces. (3) If the thumbwheel has an OFF 0 YES position, a detent should be pro-vided for feedback at that point. ' 123
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 14 of 19
- - - ~......._ _ _ _ __:G:::_Ul:!'.:DE::;:Ll::,:NE;__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
6.4.5.1 (Cont'd) s~0/ I 11~!/ 11/#.I ..f , I f-_;,..~-;:_f--"'~.:.""'-f---.;,__t-"""."'"------,
/,
- d. DISCRETE SETTING {STEPPED)
THUMBWHEELS (1) Thumbwheel controls which have I YES discrete settings should be, detented between positions. The control should*snap into each position, and resist intermediate or uncertain settings. (2) Discrete thumbwheel controls should conform to the following specifications. (See Exhibit 6.4-14) (a) Diameter (D) (inches) M ~ES Minimum 1.5 Maximum 2.5 (b) Trough distance (L) (inches) M !YES Minimum 0.45 Maximum 0. 75 (c) Width, (W) (inches) M !YES Minimum 0.1 (d) Depth (H) (inches) M !YES Minimum 0.125 Maximum 0.5 (e) Resistance (ounces) M IYES Minimum 6 Maximum 20 6.4.5.2 SLIDE SWITCHES
- a. SURF ACE - The surface of slide NIA ~IA switches should be serrated or knurled.
- b. DIMENSIONS - Slide switches should conform to approximately the following dimensions. See Exhibit 6.4-15.
(1) Thickness (T): 0.25 inch . NIA ~IA
- 124
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 15_of 19
- 6.4.5.2b (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE 7 (2) Length (L): 1.0 inch. NIAN/A 6.4.5.3 TOGGLE SWITCHES
- a. POSITIONING - To minimize the pos- I YES sibility of inadvertent activation or setting between control positions, tog-gle switches should have an elastic resistance that increases as the control is moved and drops as the switch snaps into position.
- b. FEEDBACK - Toggle switches should I YES emit an audible click, or provide some other source of feedback on activation.
- c. DIMENSIONS - To ensure the most effective* use, toggle switches should conform to the following dimensions.
See Exhibit 6.4-16.
- (1)
(2) Arm length (L), for use by one finger (inches) Minimum 0.5 Maximum 2.0 Tip diameter (D) (inches) Minimum 0.125 M M YES YES Maximum 1.0 (3) Resistance (small switch) (ounces) M YES Minimum. 10 Maximum 16. (4) Resistance (large switch) (ounces) M YES Minimum 10 Maximum 40 * (5) Displacement (A), two position M YES (degrees) Minimum 30
- Maximum 120 125
.P TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 16 of 19
- 6.4.5.3c * (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "
~
y:// ~*/
~ ~
II G
~II
~~
I
/1 ~
I (6) Displacement (A), three position M YES
* (degrees between settings)
Minimum 18 i Maximum 60 ./,' J Optimum 25 6.4.5.4 ROCKER SWITCHES
- a. ORIENTATION - Rocker switches N/A N/A should ordinarily be oriented vertically.
(1) Activation of the upper part NIA NIA should control the ON or INCREASE function'. (~) Horizontal orientation should be NIA NIA used only when the location of the controlled. function or equipment requires it.
- b. INDICATION OF ACTIVATION
- (1)
(2) Activation should be indicated by a snap feel, an audible click, or an integral light. In the ON position, the top of the switch should be flush with the panel surface. N/A NIA NIA NIA
- c. RESISTANCE (1) Control resistance should grad- NIA NIA ually increase, then drop to zero when the control snaps into posi-tion.
(2) This resistance should preclude N/A NIA the switch being placed between positions.
- d. INADVERTENT ACTIVATION - If it NIA NIA controls a critical function, the switch should be protected by channel guards or other means to prevent inadvertent activation .
- 126
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 17 of 19
- 6.4.5.4 (Cont'd) e.
GUIDELINE ROCKER SWITCH DIMENSIONS - (see
~
I~ &ii If
. //7 , I
~
~ ~
I~ ~
*'1
§
~
- Exhibit 6.4-17):
(1) Width (W) (inches) N/A N/A Minimum 0. 75 Maximum 1.5 (2) Resistance (ounces) N/A N/A Minimum 10 Maximum 40 (3) Displacement, two-position N/A N/A switches (A) (degrees) Minimum 30 Maximum 120 (4) Displacement, three-position N/A N/A switches (A) (degrees) Minimum 18 Maximum 60 Optimum 25 6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING a .. REDUNDANCY - In all applications of N/A N/A color coding, color should provide redundant information. That is, the pertinent information should be avail-able from some other cue in addition to color.
- b. NUMBER OF COLORS (1) The number of colors used for NIA N/A coding should be kept to the mini-mum needed for providing suf-ficient information.
-c2> The number of colors used for NIA N/A coding should not exceed 11.
- 127
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 18 of 19.
- 6.5.1.6 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE #
~
i! ~~!
~
~
I
~
~
*~I ~
~
~
~
'1
~
~
I ..,~~
~
I
- c. MEANING OF COLORS (1) The meaning attached to a partic- NIA NIA ular color should be narrowly defined.
(2) Red, green, and amber (yellow) NIA NIA should be reserved for the following uses: Red: unsafe, danger, immediate NIA NIA operator action required, or an indication that a critical para-meter is out of tolerance. Green: safe, no operator action NIA NIA required, or an indication that a parameter is within tolerance. Amber (yellow): hazard (poten- NIA NIA tially unsafe), caution, attention required, or an indication that a marginal value or parameter exists.
- e. PRINCIPLES OF COLOR SELECTION (1) The primary principle which NIA NIA should be applied in selecting colors for coding purposes which do not have the immediate safety implications of red, green, and amber is to ensure that each color is recognized as different from any other. Exhibit 6.5-7 lists 22 colors of maximum contrast.
Each successive color has been selected so that it will contrast
.maximally with the color just preceding it and satisfactorily with earlier colors in the list.
. The first 9 colors have been selected so as to yield satisfac-tory contrast for red-green-deficient as well as color-normal
- 128
TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 19 of 19
- GUIDELINE
...--------_.;;.------------+-~f---+-------+----f I
~
s:i ~ g; If It~
$ I ii1t- - ~ ~~... ! ,
!f I ;._..-------;
I 6.5.1.&e(l) (Cont'd) observers. The remaining 13 colors are useful only for color-normal observers. (2) Colors selected for coding should N/A N/A contrast well with the background on which they appear. (3) Ambient lighting in the area in N/A N/A which color coding is used will influence the apparent color of the coded element (especially for surface colors). Each color selected for coding should.be evaluated under all illumination conditions under which it is used. 6.8.3.1 SEPARATION OF CONTROLS Recommended minimum control sepa-ration distances are shown in Exhibits 6.8-2 and 6.8-3. In most cases, control room oper-ations will require greater separation. The function requirements that should be con-sidered are:
- a. ACCESS - Control access should not I YES be impeded by any position of an adja-cent control.
- b. INADVERTENT ACTUATION -Control I NO 20A03059 1-2 actuation should not result in advertent actuation of an adjacent control.
- c. SIMULTANEOUS ACTUATION - I NO 20003016 II-6 Simultaneously actuation of adjacent controls (where required) should be possible .
- 129
3.11 Displays Survey This section documents the results of the displays survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.11.1 Objectives The objectives of the displays survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which all displays in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify and document any features of the displays that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.11.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the display design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The display topics evaluated include:
- Display failure
- Usability of displayed values
- Readability
- Printing on the display face
- Scale markings
- Coding
- Display movement
- Scale pointers
- Zone markings
- Light indicators (legend and simple)
- Legend design
- Trend recorders
- CRT displays were evaluated as part of the computer survey. Several NUREG-0700 guidelines appropriate to displays are addressed as part of task analysis and task verification and validation activities. These guidelines have been incorporated into the verification and validation evaluation reports
- 130
3.11.3 Criteria
- The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.5.Llf; 6.5.1.2d(l) through e; 6.5.1.3a through c(l) and d(l) through d(6);
6.s.1:4a(l) through f; 6.5.1.5a through c and e and f; 6.5.1.6a through c(2) and d(3) through* e(3); 6.5.2.la through c; s*.s.2.2a(l) through c; 6.5.2.3a through c; 6.5.2.4a through c(3); 6.5.2.5c; 6.5.3.la(l) through c(l) and d; 6.5.3.2a(l), a(3), and b; 6.5.3.3a(l) through b(7); 6.5.4.la through d and g through k; 6.5.4.2a(l) through b(4); 6.5.5.la(l) through c(2); 6.5.5.2a(l} through c; and 6.5.3.3c. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-11. 3.11.4 Method 3.11.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data collected during the operator interviews were reviewed to identify potential problems with the design, location, or information content of the CR displays.
- b. Data were collected using the checklists from the displays task plan.
Data were collected primarily through operator interviews and direct observation of displays in the CR. As necessary, measurements were made of the physical characteristics (e.g., characterize, height-to-width
- c.
ratios, etc.) of CR displays. Where guidelines refer to consistency with operating procedures (e.g., 6.5.1.4.e), existing procedures were reviewed. Data were recorded on the appropriate forms. 3.11.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:
- a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the instru-ment or instruments involved (e.g., legend lights, meters, chart recorders, etc.), a description of the problem including the N.UREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
- c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the displays task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
3.11.5 Findings The findings of the displays survey are presented in Table 3-11, "Displays Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." A tota~ of 109 criteria were applied to the displays in the 131
Surry control room. Of these, 9 (8%) were not applicable, 53 (49%) were in compliance, and 47 (43%) were not in compliance. A total of 108 HEDs were generated which document all of the 47 criteria which were not met. In general, those HEDs address display labeling, usability, readability, adequacy of information presentation and methods of inf~rmation presentation. Table 3-11 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED *
- 132
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 1 OF 16
- GUIDELINE 6.5.1.1 INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED "y;~; h 7
~
~
I
§
~- -~
~- I
~ ~ ~
~
,t; r1 it
~
~
I f, DISPLAY FAIL URE - When panel I NO 20A02203 CPT instruments, such as meters, fail or 22A02030 CPT become inoperative, the failure should 22A02056 CPT be apparent to the operator (e.g., 22A02057 CPT through off-scale indication). 22A02058 11-6 6.5.1.2 USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUm;
- d. SCALE RANGE - Scales should be selected to:
(1) Span the expected range of opera- I NO 20002006 CPT tional parameters, or 20A02201 1-3 20A02209 Il-5 20A02210 1-2 20A02211 IIl-7 20A02212 1-2 20A02213 IIl-9 20A02214 Il-6 20A02215 1-2 20A02216 II-5
- 20A02217 20A02218 20A02219 20A02232 20A02236 20A02241 22A02078 II-5 II-5 11-5 CPT 11-6 Il-6 IIl-7 22A02079 Il-7 (2) . Employ appropriate scale ranging I NO 20A02201 1-3
*techniques, or 20A02209 Il-5 20A02210 1-2 20A02211 Ill-7 20A02212 1-2 20A02213 IIl-9 20A02214 11-6 20A02215 1-2 20A02216 Il-5 20A02217 11-5 20A02218 Il-5 20A02219 Il-5
- 133
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDS GENERATED PAGE 2 OF 16
- 6.5.1.2 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE II~&!
~
~
Eo I $/ lai' I
~
~
~
tt;
~
~
~
I (3) Be supported by auxiliary wide- I NO 20A02202 11-6 range instruments. 20A02204 11-6 20A02205 1-1 20A02206 Il-6 20A02207 Il-7 20A02208 11-6 22A02034 CPT 22A02080 II-7 22A02081 CPT 22A02082 1-2
- e. SCALE SIZE - Scale ranges may be 0 YES expanded (or contracted) by multiplying or dividing indicated scale values by powers of ten. All such scales should be clearly marked as to whether the indicated values should be multiplied or divided, and the factor involved (e.g.,
10, 100, 1000). 6.5.1.3 READABILITY
- a. CHARACTER HEIGHT - Character height should subtend a minimum visual angle of 15 minutes, or 0.004 x viewing distance. The preferred visual angle is 20 minutes, or 0.006 x viewing distances.
0 NO 20A01136 II-5
- b. TYPE STYLE - Exhibits 6.5-1 and 6.5-2 present two recommended sets of characters, character size and style should meet the 'following:
(1) Type styles should be simple. 0 YES (2) Type styles should be consistent. 0 NO 22A02022 CPT (3) Only upper-case letters should be 0 YES used.
- c. CONTRAST - Highest contrast is provided by black and white.
(1) Visual displays should normally 0 NO. 22A02220 11-6 contain black markings on a white background . 134
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINOINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 3 OF 16
- 6.5.1.3 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE
/
"~-;
~
§
;::#
~
-~,
~~
~
~" ~
~
~
I ~
'Ii'
~
I (2) The use of color should be consis- 0 NO 22A02220 II-6 - tent with the recommendations of Guideline 6.5.1.6. Color' combina-tions should be selected to pro-vide good contrast. d, CHARACTER DIMENSIONS AND SPACING - (1) Stroke-width-to-character-height M YES ratios shot,tld be between 1:6 and 1:8. (2) Letter width-to-height ratios M YES should be between 1:1 and 3:5. (3) Numeral width-to-height ratios M YES should be 3:5. (4) Minimum space between char- M YES acters should be one stroke width *
- (5)
(6) Minimum space between words should be the width of one character. Minimum space between lines should be on-half the character height. M M YES YES 6.5.1.4 PRINTING ON THE DISPLAY FACE
- a. PROVISION OF NEEDED MESSAGE -
If any information is required to use the display, it must be provided close enough to the scale so that the scale and the message are clearly associated. The message may be communicated: (1) By printing on the display face. 0 YES (2) . By an appropriate label adjacent 0 NO 22A02234 II-7 to the display.
- b. AVOIDANCE OF EXTRANEOUS 0 NO 22A02223 CPT ITEMS - Categories of information not *-.
needed in using the display should be avoided (e.g., patent notices, manu-facturer's trademark or address) *
- 135
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 4 OF 16
- 6.5.1.4 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "
,f~-;
*~ ~
I'
/j
~
~~
I
~
~# I c1 ft
, I
~
~
C, BREVITY - To avoid distraction and 0 YES interference with the needed essential markings, messages should be written as briefly as clarity permits.
- d. ABBREVIATIONS - Only standard and 0 YES commonly accepted abbreviations should be used.
- e. CONSISTENCY WITH 0 YES PROCEDURES -The printed message should use the same terms as the procedures in display identification, parameter identification, and units displayed.
f, INDICATION OF TRANSFORMATIONS 0 YES NEEDED - Where necessary to multi-ply or divid~ the displayed readings by powers of 10 to determine quantitative value, the operation required and result
- derived must be clearly indicated
- 6.5.1.5 SCALE MARKINGS
- a. USE OF GRADUATIONS - Scales for quantitative reading should be provided with graduations consistent with the progression of their numerals.
(1) No more than 9 graduations 0 NO 22A02222 II-6 should separate numerals. (2) Major and minor graduations 0 NO 22A02023 II-6 should be used if there are up to four graduations between numerals. (3) Major, intermediate, and minor 0 NO 22A02024 . II-6 graduation should be used if there 22A02025 II-6 are five or more graduations
. between numerals .
136
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & BEDS GENERATED PAGE 5 OF 16
/JV/'/
I I GI ///
~ I I ~
~ I ,I IIUIDELlliE 6.5.1.5 (Cont'd)
- b. GRADUATION HEIGHT - Graduation M YES
\
heights as a function of viewing distance should be:
- c. VALUES INDICATED BY UNIT 0 NO 20A02228 Il-7 GRADUATIONS - Successive values 23002014 Il-7 indicated by unit graduations should be 23002043 11-5 one of those shpwn below or those 23002244 CPT values multiplied by some power of 10.
- e. LINEAR VS LOGARITHMIC SCALES - 0 YES Logarithmic scales should be avoided unless needed to display a large range of values.
- f. MULTISCALE INDICATORS -Multi- I NO 20A02003 Il-5 Table values scale indicators (i.e., single pointer, 20A02015 Il-5 needed for multiple scales) should be avoided 20A02016 11-5 6.5.1.5b and c.
unless they can be justified as of opera- 20A02017 11-7 tional benefit, and precautions are taken to avoid operator *confusion. 6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING
- a. REDUNDANCY - In all applications of 0 YES color coding, color should provide redundant information., That is, the pertinent information should be avail-able from some other cue in addition to color.
- b. NUMBER OF COLORS -
(1) The number of colors used for 0 YES coding should be kept to the mini-mum needed for providing suf-ficient information. (2) The number of colors used for 0 YES coding should not exceed 11.
- 137
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDS GENERATED PAGE 6 OF 16
- 6.5.1.6 (Cont'd)
GU_IDELINE "
~V/1 Ill
~
~
I I
;s it1I
,(' 41
~
.~
~
I C, MEANING OF COLORS (1) The meaning attached to, a par- 0 YES ticular color should be r<arrowly defined. (2) Red, green, and amber (yellow) N/A N/A should be reserved for the fol-lowing uses: Red: unsafe, danger, im*mediate N/A NIA operator a*ction required, or an indication that a critical param-eter is out of tolerance. Green: safe, no operator action NIA NIA required, or an indication that a parameter is within tolerance. Amber (yellow): hazard NIA NIA (potentially unsafe), caution, attention required, or an indica-tion that a marginal value of parameter exists.
- e. PRINCIPLES OF COLOR SELECTION (1) The primary principle which NIA NIA should be applied in selecting colors for coding purposes which do not have the immediate safety implications of red, green, and amber is to ensure that each color is recognized as different from any other. Exhibit 6.5-7 lists 22 colors of maximum contrast.
Each successive color has been selected so that it will contrast maximally with the color just preceding it and satisfactorily with earlier colors in the list.
. The first 9 colors have been selected so as to yield satis-factory contrast for red-green-deficient as well as color-normal observers. The remaining 13 colors are useful only for color-normal observers .
138
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GE~ERA,-ED PAGE 7 OF 16
~&/ 15 $/ ~/ ,,
I # * ~ I IUIDELINE I I 6.5.1.6e. (Cont'd) (2) Colors selected tor coding should N/A N/A contrast well with the background on which they appear. (3) Ambient lighting in the area in N/A N/A which color coding is used will influence the apparent color of the coded element(especially for surface colors). Each color selected for coding should be evaluated under all illumination conditions under which it is used. 6.5.2.1 DIRECTIONALITY OF MOVEMENT AND NUMBERING WITH FIXED-SCALE AND MOVING-POINTER METERS a .. CIRCULAR SCALES - Scale values 0 NO 22A02224 CPT should increase with clockwise move-ment of the pointer as in Exhibit 6.5-8.
- b. VERTICAL STRAIGHT SCALES -Scale 0 NO 22A02225 CPT
- c.
values should increase with upward movement of the pointer as in Exhibit 6.5-9. HORIZONTAL STRAIGHT SCALES - Scale values should increase with pointer movement to the right as in 0 YES Exhibit 6.5-10. 6.5.2.2 POINTERS
- a. POINTER TIP FORM -
(1) Pointer tips should be simple. 0 YES Examples of preferred and non-preferred types are given in Exhibit 6.5-11. (2) Pointer tips should be selected to 0 NO 22A02026 CPT minimize concealment of scale 22A02226 Il-7 graduation marks or numerals. (See Exhibit 6.58.)
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & BEDS GENERATED PAGE 8 OF 16 I ~&! ~/ I
~ § ~ ~
~ ~ $ ~ ~
fiUIDELIIIE I $/ ! ,f
~
6.5.2.2 (Cont'd)
- b. POINTER POSITIONING RELATIVE TO SCALE-(1) Pointer tip should extend to 0 NO 20A02038 CPT within about 1/16 inch of (but not overlap) the smallest graduation marks on the scale. (See Exhibits 6.5-8, -9,-10.)
(2) Pointers should be mounted to 0 YES avoid parallax errors.
- c. POINTER VISIBILITY - Pointer/ I NO 20A02004 Il-7 background contrast and pointer size 0 22A02227 CPT should be adequate to permit rapid recognition of pointer position.
6.5.2.3 ZONE MARKING (Exhibit 6.5-12)
- a. Zone markings should be conspicuous 0 NO 23A02242 11-7 and distinctively different for different zones .
- b.
c. Zone marking should not interfere with reading of quantitative markings. If color is used for coding, color should be related to meaning as given in Guideline 6.5.1. 6.c. 0 0 NO NO 20A02229 11-7 20A02229 Il-7 r: 6.5.2.4 ORIENTATION OF MARKINGS ON FIXED-SCALE METERS
- a. NUMERAL ORIENTATION -Individual 0 NO 22A02089 CPT numerals on any type of fixed scale 22A02047 11-6 should be vertical (see Exhibit 6.5-13).
This holds true for circular as well as linear scales.
- b. ZERO-POINT ORIENTATION -
(1) Where pointer movement is more NIA NIA than 3600, the zero point should be located at the 12 o'clock position. (2) Where positive and negative 0 YES values are displayed around a zero or null position, the zero or null point should be located at the 12 o'clock position . 140
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 9 OF 16
- 6.5.2.4 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
~
~
%~/ ~7
~
~
I
.:5
~ I
~~
-~
~
I!
~
~
~
qi:
~
~
I
- c. END-POINT INDICATION ON PAR'l1AL-REVOLUTION SCALES -
I (1) Where the scale covers 1less than a 0 YES full rotation of the pointer, scale end-points should be indicated by a break in scale (see Exhibit 6.5-13). (2) The break should be at least one 0 YES numbered_ interval iri length. (3) The break should be oriented at 0 YES the 6 o'clock position. 6.5.2.5 MOVING-SCALE METERS Moving-scale fixed-pointer meters are infre- 0 YES NOTE: CETC quently seen in nuclear power plant control moving scale is rooms. They should be avoided in favor of necessary due to the more effective fixed-scale moving- numerous values pointer types . on scale. 6.5.3.1 CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS .
- b. PRECAUTIONS TO ASSURE I NO 20A02301 11-7 UNAMBIGUOUS SENSING BY OPERATORS - Lights should not appear to be glowing when in fact they are off, or vice versa. To that end, ambient light sources should be selected, located, or controlled to avoid reflections or refractions. (See Guideline 6.1.5.3.)
- c. PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID MISINTERPRETATION -
(1) System/equipment status should I NO 20A02302 1-2 be inferred by illuminated indica- 20A02303 Il-5
- tors, and never by the absence of 20A02304 CPT illumination. 20A02307 11-5 20A02315 III-9 20B12305 Il-6 20B22306 II-6 141
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 10 OF 16
- 6.5.3.1 (Cont'd}
GUIDELINE "
~ ~&! ~I
~
I
~
§
~
~ I 41'
~
.~
CJ
~
~
~
~*
I
- d. USE AS ALERTING INI;>ICATORS - 0 YES Alerting the operator to unfavorable status should be a function of the annunciator system and not assigned to light indicators.
6.5.3.2 DESIGN AND USE OF NONLEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS
- a. IDENTIFICATION OF MEANING -
(1) Where meaning is not apparent, 0 NO 22A01138 CPT labeling must be provided close to 22A01151 II-5 the light indicator showing the 22A02310 CPT message intended by its glowing. 22A02311 n-s 22A02312 III-9 22A02313 II-5 22A02314 II-5 22B01142 III-9 (3) The color of the light should be
- b.
clearly identifiable . LIGHT INTENSITY - The illuminated indicator should be at least 1096 greater in light intensity than the surrounding panel (as measured by a spot photom-eter). 0 NO 20A02301 II-7 6.5.3.3 DESIGN AND USE OF LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS C
- a. VISIBILITY FACTORS -
(1} Light intensity of the illuminated 0 NO 20.t\02309 1-5 indicators should be at least 1096 greater than the surrounding panel (as measured by a spot photometer). (2) Legends should be legible under 0 YES ambient illumination with indica-tor lights off. (3) Legend lettering should contrast 0 YES well with background under both ambient and transilluminated lighting .
- 142
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 11 OF 16
- 6.5.3.3 (Cont'd}
GUIDELINE ~
~
~
j'j'i
~
~
~ I
~ ~
~
~7 ~
~
I; 11
~
I
- b. LEGEND DESIGN
{1} General legend design should be 0 YES consistent throughout the control
- room.
(2) Lettering should be simple, and 0 NO 22A02022 CPT should follow Guideline 6.5.1.3 for style and size. (3) Symbolic legends should be clear 0 YES and unambiguous as to their meaning. (4) Text should be short, concise, and 0 YES unambiguous. (5) Legend messages should contain 0 NO 22A02308 Il-6 no more than three lines of text. (6) Nomenclature and abbreviations 0 NO 22A01121 Il-6 should be standard, and consistent with usage throughout the control room and in the procedures. ( 7) Legends should be worded to tell 0 YES the status indicated by glowing of the light.
- c. DISTINGUISHABILITY FROM LEGEND 0 NO 22A01218 CPT PUSHBUTTONS - Illuminated legend.
indicators should be readily distinguishable from legend pushbuttons by form, size, or other factors.
- d. COLOR CODING - The color of the legend background under transillumina-tion should conform to the general NIA N/A Covered in color code established for the control Section 3.13, room. (See Guideline 6.5.1.6) Conventions. See 6.5.16c in Table 3-13 .
- 143
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & BEDS GENERATED PAGE 12 OF 16
- 1///,1/1/ ~
&UIDELINE 6.5.4.1 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS
- a. QUALITY OF EXPENDABLE I NO 20A02403 II-6 MATERIALS - Pens, inks, and paper 23A02415 II-6 should be of a quality to provide clear, 20A02404 II-6 distinct, and reliable marking. For example, ink should not clog pens or smudge on the paper.
b, SCALE COMPATIBILITY - Scales 0 NO 22A02409 I-2 printed on* the recording paper should be the same as the scales shown on the recorder.
- c. SCALE DESIGN - Recorder scales 0 NO 22A02222 II-6 should be numbered and marked 0 22A02023 II-6.
according to the general principles of 0 22A02024 Il-6 scale graduation (Guideline 6.5.1.5), 0 22A02025 11-6 with number style and dimensions 0 20Aoioa9 Il-6 according to Guidelines 6.5.1.3 and . 0 22A02221 CPT 6.5.1.4.
- d. PAPER TAKEUP AND CUTOFF - A 0 YES takeup spool should be provided to receive completed recordings. On most instruments this is provided as an
*inherent part of the design. Also, means should be provided for tearing off completed records for storage.
- g. ' USE - As a general rule, recorders I !NO 20A02005 11-6 should be used to record trend informa- 20A02035 11-6 tion and material which may be needed .I 20A02043 1;_5 for later reference. I 20A02044 1-4 I 20A02045 1-1 I 20A02046 1-2 I 20A02049 1-3 I 20A02050 11-6 I 20A02051 11-6
- h. PLACEMENT OF RECORDERS - As I NO 20A02401 Ill-8 devices which must be verified and I 20A02414 1-2 attended by the operator, graphic recorders should in principle be located within the primary operating _area rather than on back panels.
144
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & BEDS GENERATED PAGE 13 OF 16 11!, 1/ll IIUIDELINE I I I _,,I 6.5.4.1 (Cont'd) i; PAPER-SPEED ADJUSTABILITY -Not 0 NO 23002406 1-2 only should high paper speed option be provided to run out records for detach-ment, but a selection of lower speeds should be available to permit adjust-ment of the time scale so that rate-of-change information can be indicated.
- j. ANNOTATION - It should be con- 0 YES venient to .annotate recordings with date and time markings, with paper speed if varied from normal, with parameter identification, or with any other relevant information. -
- k. VISIBILITY - Recorder design should I NO 20A02402 Il-6 ensure that all data will be visible through the window of the recorder and not require* open-door operation to expose it.
6.5.4.2 SPECIFIC RECORDER TYPES .
- a. CONTINUOUS RECORDERS -
(1) LABELING - Labels should identify the parameters recorded. With multiple-pen recorders, parameters should be listed in the 0 YES order of the associated scales on the recorder. (2) INK COLORS - Each pen should *o NO 20A02410 Ii-6 use a different colored ink to permit channel identification from line color. Colors selected should be distinctively different and should afford good contrast with the paper.
- b. DISCRETE RECORDERS -
(1) CHANNEL OVERLOAD - The recorder should not be loaded 0 YES beyond its designed channel capacity because this adds com-plexity to the analysis and pro-longs sampling cycle time .
- 145
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 14 OF 16
- 6.5.4.2b (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE I Jjf.
~
~
~
l
~
g: Ii
$/ J:/
. ~
/!Iii *
~
le;
~
~
ct"
~
I (2) CHANNEL IDENTIFICATION ON 0 YES INSTRUMENT - . Discrete recorders should be equipped to display an easily viewed manner the channel being plotted. Viewing from odd and incon- ' venient angles should not be imposed. (3) CHANNEL IDENTIFICATION ON 0 ~o 20A02411 11-6 RECORDING - Number-printing mechanism should be designed and maintained to provide clear, sharp, and small numbering to avoid crowding of data and conse-quent analysis problems. (4) CHANNEL SELECTION I N°O 20A02405 III-8 CAP ABILITY - Provision should I 20A02408 III-9 be made. to select any single channel for immediate display without awaiting completion of a sampling cycle. 6.5.5.1 DRUM-TYPE COCNTERS
- a. NUMERICAL PRESENTATION FACTORS -
\
(1) ORIENTATION - Multidigit 0 ~ES numbers formed by several counter drums should be read horizontally from left to right (see Exhibit 6.5'-14). (2) WIDTH-HEIGHT RATIO - To M "ES compensate for the distortion imposed by the curved surface of the drum, counter numerals should reflect a width-height ratio* of 1:1, not 3:5 as recom-
.mended for numerals and other displays .
146
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS&: BEDS GENERATED PAGE 15 OF 16
- 6.5.5.la (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE rf I!
~/. hi
~
I
~
§ l:i
!j~
I
!f!
J
~
~
#;
~
~
~
I (3) GROUPING OF NUMERALS - If 0 NO 22A02501 I-5 more than* four digits are required, they should be,grouped and the groupings sepal'ated as appropriate by commas, by a decimal point, or by additional space (see Exhibit 6.5-15). (4) CONTRAST - The color of the 0 NO 22A02502 CPT numerals and of the background should be chosen to yield high contrast. **s1ack numerals on white drum surface is recommended. (5) DRUM FINISH - The surface of 0 YES the drums and surrounding areas should have a .matte finish to minimize glare.
- b. MOUNTING -
- (1) Drum-type counters are clearly readable only within a viewing angle that is more restrictive.
than for most displays. Accordingly, they should be
- mounted perpendicular to the 0 NO 20A02503 1-5 opera tor's line of sight.
(2) Counters should be mounted as 0 NO 20A02503 I-5 close as possible to the panel surface to minimize shadows and maximize viewing angle. (3) The window should be sized to 0 YES allow no more than one digit per drum to appear in the window at any one time. C, DR UM MOVEMENT - (1) Numbers should change by snap 0 YES action rather than through con-tinuous movement. (2) The counter drums should move upward with increasing values . 0 YES 147
TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 16 OF 16
- GUIDELINE 6.5.5.2 ELECTRONIC COUNTERS
" 1// *1i7 ,
~ I ~
~ ~
I ~
/:1
~
I
- a. NUMERICAL PRF.SENTATION FACTORS -
I (1) ORIENTATION - Multidigit 0 YES counters should be oriented to read horizontally from left to right. (2) CHARACTER STYLE - Simple 0 YES character fonts should be used. Styles using variable stroke widths, slanted characters, etc., should be avoided. (3) NUMERAL HEIGHT - Numerals M YES should be of such a height as to subtend a visual angle of 15 minutes from the farthest antici-pated viewing distance. (4) WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT RATIO - M YES Width-to-height ratio of numerals should be approximately 3:5. (5) SP ACING - Horizontal spacing M YES between numerals should be between one-quarter and one-half the numeral width.
- b. RATE OF CHANGE - Numerals should 0 YES not follow each other faster than two per second when the opera tor is expected to read the numerals consecutively.
- c. CONTRAST - Character-to-background M YES
- contrast ratio should be between 15:1 minimum and 20:1 preferred .
148
- 3.12 Labels and Location Aids Survey This section documents the results of the labels and location aids survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan.
3.12.1 Objectives The o~jectives of the labels and location aids survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which all labels and location aids in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify and document any features of the labels and location aids that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.12.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the labels and location aids in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include: Labeling of .annunciator panels. Color* coding of labels Need for labeling Hierarchical labeling
- Placement of labels
- Mounting of labels
- Spatial orientation of labels
- Label visibility
- Label content
- Word selection
- Consistency
- Symbols
- Control position labeling
- Label readability
- Temporary labels
- Demarcation
- Mimics .
149
3.12.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.3.3.3c(3); 6.5.1.6a through e; 6.6.1.1, 6.6.1.2a and b; 6.6.2.la through f; 6.6.2.2a and b; 6.6.2.3a and b; 6.6.2.4a through d; 6.6.3.la through e; 6.6.3.5; 6.6.3.6, 6.6.3. 7a and b; 6.6.3.Sa through c; 6.6.5.la through h; 6.6.5.2a and b; 6.6.6.2a _through c; 6.6.6.3; 6.6.6.4a and b; and 6.8.3.2d. 3.12.4 Method 3.12.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data were collected using the checklists from the labels and location aids task plan. Data were collected primarily through interviews with operators and direct observation of the CR labeling. As necessary, measurements were made of the physical characteristics (e.g., character size and separation, height-to-width ratios, etc.) of the CR labels. For those guidelines related to consistency with operating procedures (e.g.,
6.6.3.3.c), operating procedures were reviewed.
- b. Data were recorded on the appropriate data collection forms.
3.12.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:
- a*
b. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the labels involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
- c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the labels task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
3.12.5 Findings The findings of the labels and location aids survey are presented in Table 3-12, "Labels Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 111 criteria were applied to the labels and location aids in the Surry control room. Of these, 3 (3%) were not applicable, 46 (41 %) were in compliance, and 62 (56%) were not in compliance. A total of 49 HEDs were generated which document all of the 62 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address label content, temporary labels, lack of a hierarchical labeling scheme, spatial orientation, word selection, symbol meaning, position labeling, color usage, nonstandard abbreviations, readability of labels, and lack of demarcation . 150
Table 3-12 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED
- 151
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 13
- &UIDHINE 6.3.3.3 ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL I
ALARM TILES
- c. LABELING OF AXES (1) The vertical and horizontal axes M YES of annunciator panels should be labeled with alphanumerics for ready coordinate designation of a particular visual tile.
(2) Coordinate designation is prefer- 0 YES red on the left and top sides of the annunciator panel. (3) Letter height for coordinate M YES designation should be consistent with a subtended visual angle of at least 15 minutes as viewed from a central position within the primary operating area.
- 6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING
- a. REDUNDANCY - In all applications of color coding, color should provide redundant information. That is, the pertinent information should be available from some other cue in I IYES addition to color.
- b. NUMBER OF COLORS (1) The number of colors used for I IYES coding should be kept to the mini-mum needed for providing sufficient information.
(2) The number of colors used for 0 IYES coding should not exceed 11.
- c. MEANING OF COLORS (1) The meaning attached to a I IYES particular color should be narrowly defined .
152
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 13
- 6.5.1.6c. (CON'rD)
(2) Red, green, amber (yellow) should I NO 22A01301 1-3 be reserved for the following 22A01306 11-7 uses: 22A01307 11-7 22A01308 1-1 Red: unsafe, danger, immed-
- iate opera tor action required, or an indication that a critical parameter is out of tolerance.
Green: safe, no operator action required, or an indi-cation that a parameter is within tolerance. Amber (yellow): hazard (potentially unsafe), caution, attention required, or an indi-cation that a marginal value or parameter exists.
- d. CONSISTENCY OF MEANING (3) The meaning of a particular color I !YES should remain the same both within and among the various
,systems to which it is applied.
- e. PRINCIPLES OF COLOR SELECTION (1) The primary principle which 0 !YES should be applied in selecting colors for coding purposes which do not have the immediate safety implications of red, green, and amber is to ensure that each color is recognized as different from any other. Exhibit 6.5-7 lists. 22 colors of maximum contrast.
Each successive color has been selected so that it will contrast maximally with the color just
. preceding it and satisfactorily with earlier colors in the list.
The first 9 colors have been selected so as to yield satisfactory contrast for red-green-deficient as well as color-normal observers. The remaining 13 colors are useful only for color-normal observers . 153
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 13
- 11-~--'--_1.,./.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __.:G:.:,;UID:.:E:.:LIN:.:E~---------+__;~;..
. 6.5.l.6e. (CONT'D)
__4i'_~___;,;.."~/a-...;s_8_~,.../ ____,_,_~__-1/ (2) Colors selected for coding should 0 YES contrast well with the background on which they appear. 1
.f (3) Ambient lighting in the area in 0 YES which color coding is used will influence the apparent color of*
the coded element (especially for surface colors). Each color selected for coding should be evaluated _under all illumination conditions *under which it is used. 6.6.1.1 NEED FOR LABELING Controls, displays, and other equipment items I NO 20 AOll 01 11-6 that must be located, identified, or manipu- 0 22A01145 11-6 lated should be appropriately and clearly 0 22A01146 11-6 labeled to permit rapid and accurate human 0 22A01149 11-6 performance.
- 6.6.1.2 HIERARCHICAL SCHEME To reduce confusion, operator search time, and redundancy, a hierarchical labeling should be used. (See Exhibit 6.6-1.)
- a. RANKING 0 YES (1) Major labels should be used to 0 NO 22A01108 11-6 identify major systems or opera tor work stations.
(2) Subordinate labels should be used 0 NO 22A01109 11-6 to identify subsystems or func-tional groups. (3) Component labels should be used 0 NO 22A01110 11-6 to identify each discrete panel or co.nsole element. (4) . Labels should not repeat informa- 0 NO 22A011li 11-6 tion contained in higher-level labels . 154
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 13
~/. i!I
~I I I I
~ ~ ~ I' IUIDEllNE I I $~# #
Ii 6.6.1.2 (CONT'D)
- b. LETTER GRADATION$ - Labels should be graduated in letter size such that:
(1) System/work station labels are 0 NO 22AOI112 Il-6 about 2596 larger than (2) Subsystem/functional group labels 0 NO 22A01112 Il-6 which are about 2596 larger than (3) Component labels which are about 0 NO 22A01112 Il-6 2596 larger than _ (4) Control position identifiers. 0 NO 22A01112 ll-6 6.6.2.1 ,PLACEMENT
- a. NORMAL PLACEMENT - Labels 0 NO . 22A01114 II-6 should be placed above the panel ele-ment(s) they describe. _
- b. PANEL LABELING"- The placement 0 NO 22A01114 Il-6 of labels on control panels should con-form to the guidance shown in Exhibit
- -c.
6.6-1. VISIBILITY ENHANCEMENT .....;. Labels of elements located above eye level should be positioned to ensure label visibility. 0 NO 22AOI114 Il-6
- d. PROXIMITY - Labels should be placed 0 YES close to the panel element. See_ Exhibit 6.6-2.
- e. LABELS ON CONTROLS - Labels I YES should not appear on the control itself when an adjustment or manipulation is required that causes the operator's hand to *obscure the label for an extended time period.
- f. ADJACENT LABELS - Adjacent labels
_should be separated by sufficient space 0 YES so that they are not read as one continuous labeL See Exhibits 6.6-3 and 6~6-4. 6.6.2.2 MOUNTING
- a. INTEGRITY- Label should be mounted 0 YES in such a way as to preclude accidental removaL 155
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 13
- 6.6.2.2 (CONT'D)
GUIDELINE /JV/I §~
~
e
~
~
~
~ ~
I
~*
~ ~
;r
~
G I ~ 4!
~.
7
- b. SURF ACE - Labels should be mounted 0 YES on a fiat surface.
I 6.6.2.3 SPA'ffAL OB.IENTA'l10N /
- a. HORIZONTAL ORIENTATION (1) Labels should be oriented horizon- 0 NO 22A01117 CPT tally so that they may be read quickly and easily from left to right.
(2) Although not normally recom- 0 YES mended, vertical orientation may be used only where space is limited.
- b. CURVED PATTERNS - Curved pat- 0 NO 22A01118 CPT terns of labeling should be avoided *. See Exhibit 6.6-5.
- 6.6.2.4 VISIBILITY
- a. OTHER INFORMATION SOURCES -
Labels should not cover any other infor-
. matiori source. They should not detract from or obscure figures or scales which must be read by. the opera tor.
0 YES
- b. CONCEALMENT -"- Labels should not 0 YES be covered or obscured by other units in the equipment assembly.
- c. CONTROLS - Labels should be visible I YES to the operator during control actu.a-tion.
- d. CLEANING - Administrative proce- 0 NO 22A01140 III-8 dures should be in place for the periodic cleaning of labels.
6.6.3.1 KINDS OF INFORMATION
- a. PRIMARY FUNCTION - Labels should I NO 20A01101 II-6 describe the function of equipment items.
- b. SECONDARY FUNCTION --If needed NIA NIA for clarity, engineering characteristics or nomenclature may also be described
- 156
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERA TED Page 6 of 13
- 6.6.3.2 WORD SELECTION GUIDELINE " y;~;
~
~
~
I
,;::
~
~~
I
~
~# ;:/
~
~
I .,
~
~
I
- a. INTENDED ACTION --:'Ille words 0 NO 23003067 CPT employed in the label should express exactly what action is intended.
- b. CLARITY - Instructions should be I NO 20A01101 II-6 clear.
- c. DIRECT - Instructions should be I NO 20A01101 II-6 direct.
- d. MEANING - Words should be used that I NO 20A01102 CPT have a commonly accepted meaning for all intended users.
- e. TECHNICAL TERMS - Unusual tech- I NO 20A01102 CPT nical terms should be avoided.
- f. SPELLING - Words should be correctly 0 NO 22A01120 II-6 spelled.
6.6.3.3 CONSISTENCY
- b. INTERNAL CONSISTENCY - Labels 0 NO 22A01121 Il-6 should be consistent within and across pieces of equipment in their use of.
words, acronyms, abbreviations, and part/system numbers. See Exhibit 6.6-6.
- c. CONSISTENCY WITH PROCEDURES D YES
- There should be no mismatch between nomenclature used in pro-cedures and that printed on the labels.
6.6.3.4 SYMBOLS
- a. MEANING. - Abstract symbols should I NO 20A01102 CPT be used only if they have a commonly accepted meaning for all intended users (e.g., %).
- b. DISTINGUISHABILITY _: Symbols NIA N/A should be unique and distinguishable from each other.
- c. STANDARD - A commonly accepted 0 NO *22A01122 II-6 standard configuration should be used.
- d. CONSISTENCY - Symbols should be consistently used within and across panels. 0 NO 22A0112~ 11-6 157
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 13
- 6.6.3.4 (CONT'D)
GUIDELINE 7
- e. ROMAN NUMERALS - Use of Roman I NO 20A01123 Il-6 numerals should be avoided.
6.6.3.5 BREVITY Brevity should not be stressed if the results I NO 20A01102 11-6 will be unfamiliar to operating personnel. 0 20A01143 11-6 Words on labels should be concise and still convey the in tended meaning. See Exhibit 6.6-7. 6.6.3.6 SIMILARITY Words and abbreviations of similar appear- 0 -~ES ance should be avoided where an error in interpretation could result. When labels containing similar words, abbrf:lviations, or acronyms are located in close proximity to each other, different words should be selected or means of coding should be used to reduce the probability of selecting the wrong
- control or reading .the wrong display. See Exhibit 6.6-8.
6.6.3.7 FUNCTIONAL GROUPS
- a. FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP -
..Labels should be used _to identify func-0 !YES tionally grouped controls or displays.
- b. LOCATION - Labels should be located 0 NO 22 AOll 24 II-6 above the functional groups they ident-ify.
6.6.3.8 CONTROL POSITION LABELING
- a. POSITION - All discrete functional o NO 22A01126 II-6 control positions should be identified.
- b. DIRECTION - Direction of motion* 0 NO 22A01149 II-6 (increase, *decrease) should be identified for continuous motion rotary controls.
- c. VISIBILITY - Control position infor- O NO 22A01144 II-5 mation should be visible to the operator during operation of the control
- 158
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 13
, I
- IIUIDELINE 6.6 ..3.9 ACCESS OPENING, DANGER, WARNING, AND SAFETY INSTRUCTION It~~/
~
I
~
,1 I
/// I I #
~
LABELING
- a. ACC~ OPENING LABELS - Each N/A N/A access opening used by control room operators should be labeled to identify the function of items accessible through it.
- b. DANGER, WARNING, AND SAFETY 0 NO 22001139 Il-5 INSTRUCTION LABELS - All danger, warning, and safety instruction labels should be in accordance with appropri-ate safety standards.
6.6.4.1 READABILITY
- a. CHARACTER HEIGHT *
(1) Character height should subtend a M YES visual angle of 15 minutes as a minimum, or 0.004 x viewing distance. A visual angle of 20 minutes, or 0.006 x viewing dis-tance, is preferred. (2) Letter height should be identical 0 NO 22A01129 II-6 for all labels within the same hierarchical level, based on the maximum viewing distance.
- b. CONTRAST (1) To ensure adequate contrast and 0 NO 22A01130 II-6 prevent loss of readability because of dirt, dark characters should be provided on a light background.
(2) If color print is used for coding 0 YES purposes, it should conform to the established color coding scheme for the control room. (See Guide-line 6.5.1.6.) Colors should be chosen for maximum contrast against the label background. Exhibit 6.6-9 rates various color combinations in terms of relative legibility . 159
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 13
- GUIDELINE 6.6.4.2 STYLE (Exhibits 6.5~1 and 6.5-2)
/iy,// h I
~
~
~
q I
~
§
~
~ ~
I
~
~
~
I' # Jr I
- a. CHARACTER SELECTION (1) Labels should be prepar,ed in capi- 0 YES tal letters.
(2) The design of letters and numer- 0 YES als should be simple and without flourishes or serifs.
- b. CHARACTER WIDTH (1) Letter width-to-height ratio 0 NO 22A01132 II-6 should be between 1:1 and 3:5.
(2) Numeral width-to-height ratio 0 NO 22A01132 II-6 should be 3:5 except for the numeral "4" which should be one stroke width wider and the : numeral "1" which should be one stroke in width.
- c. STROKE WIDTH - Stroke width-to- 0 NO 22A01133 II-6 character height ratio should be between 1:6 and 1:8.
- d. SPACING (1) The minimum space between 1\1 YES characters should be one stroke width.
(2) The minimum space between M YES words should be one character width. (3) The minimum space between lines M NO 22A02308 II-6 should be one-half of the char-acter hefght. 6.6.5.1 USE OF TEMPORARY LABELS
- a. NECESSITY - Temporary labels should 0 NO 22A01137 II-6 be used only when necessary.
- b. HUMAN FACTORS PRACTICES - 0 NO 22A01137 II-6 Temporary labels should confor*m to good human engineering principles .
160
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 10 or 13
- 6.6.5.1 (CONT'D)
GUIDELINE .t ~~7
~
~
I (,j
~
~
~
~~
I
~
~7 J
~
~
II
~
Cli' l! If I C, VISIBILITY - Tempor11ry labels should 0 YES not obscure prior permanent labels unless the old label is to be replaced.
- d. IDENTIFICATION - Tag-out labels I NO 20A01201 II-5 should clearly identify out-of-service 20A03014 II-5 c*omponents and equipment. 0 22A01135 III-8
- e. MOUNTING - Tag-outs should be 0 YES securely affixed.
f, OBSCURATION - Tag-outs should not obscure the label associated with the nonoperable device.
- g. ACTIVATION - Tag-outs should be I YES designed to physically prevent actu-ation of a control.
- h. ADJACENT DEVICES - Tag-outs 0 YES should not obscure any adjacent devices or their associated labels.
6.6.5.2 CONTROL OF TEMPORARY LABELS
- a. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES - 0 !No 22A01147 11-5 The use of temporary labels should be administratively controlled.
- b. REVIEW PROCEDURES - A review procedure should be in place that will result in a determination of:
(1) when temporary labels are D NO 22A01150 11-5 needed; (2) how they will be used; D !No 22A01150 11-5 (3) their content (given human engi- D tNo 22A01150 11-5 neer"ing requirements); (4) their installation; D INO 22A01150 11-5 (5) the impact of their use on other D INo 22A01150 II-5 system equipment (e.g., annun-ciators, mimics); 161
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 11 of 13 .
- 6.6.5.2b. (CONT'D)
GUIDELINE jj~~;
~
"I!
~
I
~
~
$ /
~
~I ~
~
I ~ 41,
~
~
I (6) documentation requirements; D NO 22A01150 II-5 (7) retraining requirementffe; D NO 22A01150 II-5 (8) their periodic review; and D NO 22A01150 Il-5 (9) their removal. D NO 22A01150 II-5 6.6.6.2 DEMARCA'llON (See Exhibit 6.8-1)
- a. USE - Lines of demarcation can be used to:
(1) Enclose functi,onally related dis- 0 NO 20A01305 II-5 plays. ' 23A01006 II-6 (2) Enclose functionally related con- 0 NO 20A01305 II-5 trols. (3) Group related controls and dis- 0 NO 20A01305 11-5 plays .
- b.
c. CONTRAST - Lines of demarcation should be visually distinctive from the panel background. PERMANENCE - Lines of demarca-tion should be .permane11tly attached. 0 I YES YES 6.6.6.3 COLOR Color should be dedicated to specific func- I NO 20A02304 CPT tions or conditions throughout the control I 20B12305 11-6 room in order for the code to elicit the I . 20B22306 11-6 expected operator response. The color cod-* 0 22A01141 11-5 ing scheme should be used consistently throughout the control room. Refer to Guideline 6.5.1.6 for specific recommenda-tions on the use of color.
- 162
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 12 of 13
- 6.6.6.4 USE OF MIMICS GUIDELINE
~
~
~~ &
I
,f:
~
~ I 41
~//7 fif f
~
* ~
q: l! 7
- a. COLOR (1) Flow paths should be color coded. 0 NO 22A02602 CPT Colors should be selected in con-formance with Guidelines 6.5.1.6.
(2) The mimic colors should be dis- 0 YES criminably different from each other. (3) There should be adequate contrast 0 YES between the mimic colors and the panel. (4) Mimic lines depicting flow of the 0 YES same contents (e.g., steam, water, electricity) should be color coded the same throughout the control room. (5) No more than 4 mimic lines of the 0 YES same color should run in parallel if the operator must quickly identify any one of the lines.
- b. MIMIC LINES (1) Differential line widths may be 0 YES used to code flow paths (e.g.,
- significance, volume, level).
(2) Overlapping of mimic lines should* 0 YES be avoided. (3) Flow directions should be clearly 0 NO 22A02603 III-9 indicated by distinctive arrow-heads. (4) All mimic origin points should be 0 YES labeled or begin at labeled com-ponents. (5) All mimic destination or terminal 0 NO 22A02604 CPT points should be labeled or end 8:t labeled components. (6) Component representations on mimic lines shquld be identified . 0 YES 163
TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 13 of 13
- _ _..;.__ __:_.==::::.._
6.6.6.4 (CON'rD) 11(~~~ I
/' / J I I I
I; 11/ ~l GUIDELINE _ _ _ _ _-1-.;::.+--=--1-_:_....::_+-~~-_,;.,_,---;
$ q, I
- c. SYMBOLS
( 1) Graphic symbols should be readily 0 YES understood and commonly used. (2) Symbols should be used consis- 0 YES tently.
- 6.8.3.2 STRINGS OR CLUSTERS OF SIMILAR COMPONENTS
- d. LARGE MATRICES (1) Large matrices of similar com- 0 NO 22A02605 CPT ponents should have the coordi-nate axes labeled for identifica-tion of any single component within the grid.* The left and top sides of the matrix should be used for labeling (see Exhibit 6.8-6) .
- (2) Large matrices should be sub-divided by appropriate demar-cation .
0 INO 22A02605 CPT 164
3.13 Conventions Survey* This section documents the results of the conventions survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.13.1 Objectives The objectives of the conventions survey were to:
- a. Identify the NUREG-0700 defined conventions that are applied in the Surry control room.
- b. Determine if the applications of the identified conventions are con-sistent across the applicable design features.
- c. Document any inconsistent or missing conventions in the control room.
3.13.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of color, shape, and arrangement coding" across design features in the main control room at Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:
- Coding of controls
- Color coding of controls and displays
- Label content consistency
- Enhancement of emergency controls Abbreviations and acronyms used within the control room were addressed in the labeling survey.
3.13.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.3.3.4d; 6.4.2.2a, b, f(l) and f(2); 6.5.1.6b(2), c(2), and d(l) through d(3); 6.5.3.2a(2); 6.6.3.3a; 6.6.6.4c(l) and c(2); 6.8.1.3c and d The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-13. 3.13.4 Method 3.13.4.1 Data Collection
- a. All required data forms, plant documentation, engineering drawings,
- equipment, and materials were made available prior to conduct of this 165
- b.
c. task. Permission was obtained for all requited access to the control room. Data were collected using methods and procedures consisting of obser-vations and document reviews. Administrative procedures were reviewed to verify the items listed in the Document Review Checklist in the conventions task plan. 3.13.4.2 Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the following procedure: I
/
- a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the compo-nents involved (e.g., controls, meters, labels, etc.), a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
- c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the conventions task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
- 3.13.5 Findings The findings of the conventions survey are presented in Table 3-13, "Conventions Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 20 criteria were applied to the conventions in the Surry control room. Of these, 4 (20%) were not applicable, 6 (30%)
were in compliance, and 10 (50%) were not in compliance. A total of 7 HEDs were generated which document all of the 10 criteria which were not met. In general, those HEDs addressed color coding, including meaning and consistency; administrative control over the use of abbreviations; and a lack of enhancement techniques used on emergency controls. Table 3-13 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" means complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED
- 166
TABI..E 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&. HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 4
- GUIDELINE 6.3.3.4 VISUAL TILE LEGENDS
~
~
§
~&/ la I h
J! II
~
~
~ ~
I II
~
~
I;
~
i6 q;:
~
I
- d. ABBREVIATIONS - Abbreviations and 0 NO 22A01303 II-5 in acronyms should be consistent with 20A02105 CPT those used elsewhere in the control room.
6.4.4.1 ROTARY CONTROL DESIGN PRINCIPLES
- b. ROTARY CONTROL SHAPE 0 YES . .
CODING - If rotary controls used for widely different functions are placed on the same panel, shape coding should be employed.
- c. CODING SPECIFICATIONS - Shape-coded rotary controls should be:
(1) Visually identifiable 0 YES (2) Tactually identifiable. 0 YES 6.4.2.2 CODING OF CONTROLS (Exhibit 6.4-3} a.* CONSISTENCY - The coding system 0 YES should be uniform throughout the con-trol room.
- b. LOCATION CODING - Controls should NIA NIA Covered in be located so as to be easily related to Section 4. 4, functions and functional groupings. Validation. s*ee Controls with similar functions should 6.8.2.3 in Table be in the same location from panel to 4-2.
panel. (See Guideline 6.8.2.3.)
- f. - COLOR CODING (1) Color coding should follow the 0 NO 22A01301 I-3 recommendations of Guideline 22A01306 II-7 study. 6.5.1.6. 22A01307 II-7 22A01308 1-1 (2) When color coding is used to NIA NIA relate a control to its corre-spending display, the same color should be used for both the con-trol and the display.
167
TABLE 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 4
- 6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING IUIDELINE I
~
V//$/ ///
~
I
!It'
;::
!to If I
~
~
~
- b. NUMBER OF COLORS (2) The number of colors used for 0 YES coding should not exceed 11.
- c. MEANING OF COLORS (2) Red, green, and amber (yellow) 0 NO 22A01301 1-3 should be reserved for the 22A01306 11-7 following uses: 22A01307 11-7 22A01308 1-1 Red: unsafe, danger, immediate operator action required, or an study. indication that a critical parameter is out of tolerance.
Green: safe, no operator required, or an indication that a study. parameter is within tolerance .
- Amber (yellow): hazard (potentially unsafe), caution, study. attention required, or an indication that a marginal value or parameter exists.
~- CONSISTENCY OF MEANING (1) The meaning assigned to particu- I NO 20A02304 CPT lar colors should be consistent 0 20B12305 11-6 across all applications within the 20B22306 11-6 control room. 22A01301 1-3 22A01306 11-7 22A01307 11-7 22A01308 1-1 2.3A01004 111-9 (2) The meaning of a particular color 0 NO 20A02304 CPT should remain the same whether 20B12305 Il-6 applied to panel surfaces or pro- 20B22306 Il-6 jected in signal lights or on CRTs. 22A01301 1-3 22A01306 Il-7 22AOI307 11-7 22A01308 I-1 23A01004 III-9 168
TABLE 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 4
- 6.5.1.6 (CONT'D)
GUIDELINE ~
~
i!
~'i I C.
~
,Ii
~
~~
I
~
~ ~
{1
/ ii
~
I (3) The meaning of a particular color I NO 20Ao2304 CPT should remain the same both 0 20B12305 II-6 within and among the various 20B22306 II-6 systems to which it is applied. 22A01301 I-3 22A01306 II-7 22A01307 II-7 22A01308 1-1 23Ao1004 III-9 6.5.3.2 DESIGN AND USE OF NONLEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS
- a. IDENTIFICATION OF MEANING (2) The color of the light indicator when transilluminated should 0 NO 22A01301 I-3 study. conform to the general code established for the control room. (See Guideline 6.5.1.6.)
6.6.3.3 LABEL CONTENT CONSISTENCY
- a. *ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL - A list 0 NO 22A01302 I-4 of standard names, acronyms, abbrevia-tions, and part/system numbers should be in place and administratively controlled.
6.6.6.4 USE OF MIMICS
- c. SYMBOLS (1) Graphic symbols should be readily NIA NIA understood and commonly used.
(2) Symbols should be used NIA NIA consistently. 6.8.1.3. ENHANCING RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION
- c. COl.iOR SHADING - Color shading 0 YES may be used to enhance recognition of controls, displays, or functional groups.
When color shading is used, colors should provide adequate contrast, and should be consistent with other color coding in the control room . 169
TABLE 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 4
- 6.8.1.3 (CONT'D)
GUIDELINE
/JYJ~!
§
~
E-,
~
~
#o:i ~
~ ~
~
, Ii; ~ ~
~
-7 119:-
~
~
I
- d. EMERGENCY CONTROLS - Distinc- 0 NO 22A01304 II-5 tive enhancement techniques should be study. used for emergency C?ntrols .
6.8.2.2 LOGICAL ARRANGEMENT AND LAYOUT
- a. ORDER AND LABELING - Compo- 0 NO 20A03209 II-6 nents should be arranged left-to-right 22A01309 CPT and/or top-to-bottom, and identified in 22A01310 II-7 alphabetic or n1;1meric sequence .
170
- 3.14 Computer System Survey This section documents the results of the computer system conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with tl;le requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan.
3.14.1 Objectives - The objectives of the computer system survey were to:
- a. Assess the degree to which the computer system in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
- b. Identify and document any features of the computer system that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.
3.14.2 Scope r The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the computer system in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include: Software security Operator/computer dialogue Prompting and structuring Keyboards
- Computer function controls
- Other control devices
- Computer response time
- Access aids
* *CRT display characteristics
- Symbol and character size
- Operator-display relationships
- Data presentation for mat
- Screen layout and structuring
- Messages
- Graphic coding and highlighting
- Multiple-page considerations
- Printer characteristics Alarm messages Graph and table requirements.
171
- 3.14.3 Criteria are:
The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, paragraphs 6.5.1.6d(2), 6.7.1.la through d, 6.7.1.2a through d, 6.7.L3a through e,
- 6. 7.1.4a~ through i, 6. 7.1.5a through d, 6. 7.1.6a through d, 6. 7.1. 7a and b, 6. 7.1.8a and b, 6.7.2.la through h, 6.7.2.2a through g, 6.7.2.3a through f, 6.7.2.4a through g, 6.7.2.Sa through n, 6.7.2.6a through 1, 6.7.2.7a through m, 6.7.2.Sa through e, 6.7.3.la through f,
- 6. 7.3.2a through f, 6. 7.3.3a through d.
The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-14. 3.14.4 Method 3.14.4.1 Data Collection
- a. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the Computer System Task Plan. Data were collected primarily through direct observation of the computer system in the CR and examination of hard-copy printouts of display pages. As necessary, personnel from the Surry computer group were consulted to augment or clarify observations.
Measurements of physical characteristics of the computer system (e.g., key displacement, character size and separation, etc.) were made. System documentation, including operating procedures and hardware specifications, were reviewed, as required .
- b. All pertinent observations were recorded on the appropriate data forms.
3.14.4.2. Analysis - Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:
- a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the items involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.
- b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.
- c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the computer system task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
3.14.5 Findings The findings of the computer system survey are presented in Table 3:...14, "Computer Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 226 criteria were applied to the computer system in the Surry control room. Of these, 87 (39%) were not applicable, 102 (45%) were
- in compliance, and 37 (16%) were not in compliance. A total of 30 HEDs were generated 172
- which document all of the 37 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address uses of language characteristics, error correction, data entry, computer response Ume, computer procedures, CRT display characteristics, highlighting, printer speed, operation, and alarm messages.
Table 3-14 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED
- 173
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 29
- 6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING GUIDELINE
~
~
~0~ ;:#
!I:
II G
~ ii*
~ ~ ///~
~
§
., ~
~
I
- d. CONSISTENCY OF ME_ANING (2) The meaning of a particular color NIA NIA No color used.
should remain the same whether. applied to panel surfaces or pro-jected in signal lights or on CRTs. 6.7.1.1 SOFTWARE SECURITY
- a. AUTHORIZATION - The system 0 YES should include positive protection pro-visions to ensure that only properly authorized personnel can make changes (by entry, deletion, or alteration).
- b. SECURE STORAGE - At least one 0 YES copy of the current operating software should be stored in a secure remote location.
NIA_ NIA
- c. EDITING - When characters, words, or phrases are to be inserted, such items
_should first be collected and displayed on a_ buffer area of the screen, and then collectively inserted by one operator command.
- d. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - Before any 0 NO 20A00314 II-7 opera tor requests are processed that would result in permanent changes to*
existing data, the computer system should require operator acknowledge-ment. 6.7.1.2 OPERATOR/COMPUTER DIALOGUE
- a. LANGUAGE CHARACTERISTICS (1) Dialogue should be based on the 0 YES ope~ator's point of view, not the programmer's.
(2) Dialogue should be logical. I NO 20000310 11-7 0 2PA00315 II-7 (3) Dialogue should be used in a con- 0 YES sistent manner . 174
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 29
- 6. 7.l.2a (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE
~
t5
~&!
~
ii ii
~
~
4f
~
/1/ #
~
~
I (4) Dialogue should reflect the 0 YES vocabulary and syntax of the expected user population. (5) Input words (e.g., keywords) 0 YES should approximate real words. (6) Dialogue should require an 0 YES explicit command in order to terminate an interaction.
- b. ENTRY LENGTH - Individual input 0 YES words which must be typed should not exceed 7 characters.
C, ABBREVIATIONS (1) Abbreviations should be used 0 !YES whenever possible to minimize operator input requirements .
- (2) If the operator is using a synonym or abbreviation for a system corn-rnand name, the computer system should use the same synonym or
. abbreviation when referring to that command in messages, prompts, etc., to the operator.
0 ~ES (3) The use of abbreviations or con- 0 1ES tractions for output text should be avoided.
- d. ERROR AVOIDANCE - Operator 0 ~o 20A00318 11-7 inputs, responses, or actions which could significantly degrade computer system or plant performance should not be dependent on a single keystroke.
6.7.1.3 PROMWI'ING AND STRUCTURING
- a. OPERATOR REQUESTS - The com- 0 N'O 20A00315 II-7 puter system should contain prompting and structuring features by which an operator can request additional infer-mation .
175
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 29
- 6. 7.1.3a (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE
\
~
t:
~
~$! ~*/
~
- r i"
~
~ ~I Ji
~~
~
~
Cl'
~
~
I
- b. CORRECTION OF DATA - The com- 0 YES puter system should contain prompting and structuring features by which an opera tor can request correct.ed infor-mation when an error is detected.
- c. MODE/FILE DISPLAY - The computer 0 YES system should display the mode desig-nation and the file(s) being processed.
- d. SPECIFIC ERROR CORRECTION - 0 NO 20A00315
- II-7 The computer system should permit correction of individual errors without requiring re-entry of correctly entered data. I
- e. ENTRY FILE - The computer system NIA NIA No sequential should contain a sequential file of oper- file.
ator entries, available upon operator request. 6.7.1.4 DATA ENTRY - KEYBOARDS
- a. ALPHANUMERIC KEYBOARD NIA NIA Keyboard is ARRANGEMENT- Keyboards that simple.
combine alphabetic and numeric func-tions on a single keyboard should con-form to the standard "QWERTY" arrangement. See Exhibit 6. 7.-1.
- b. NUMERIC KEYBOARD ARRANGE- 0 YES MENT - The configuration of a key-board used to enter solely numeric data should be a 3x3+1 matrix, either "tele-phone" style or "calculator" style. see Exhibit 6. 7-2.
- c. USE OF MULTIPLE KEYBOARDS - If 0 YES there is more than one computer sys-tern keyboard in a control room, the alphanum~ric and/or numeric-only key configuration should be the same in all cases. ..
- d. KEY MEASUREMENTS - To maximize 0 YES* Keys have the effectiveness of keyboards, key barriers.
dimensions and separation should be as illustrated (see Exhibit 6. 7-3) .
- 176
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 29
- ""'"" 1///$1 /// / /
_ _ _ _ _ _ __.:.;;.:.::::;~---------f........;;+-+-;........;--1F-...;....t------; 6.7.1.4 (Cont'd)
- e. KEY DISPLACEMENT AND 0 !YES RESISTANCE - To provide positive key movement feedback to the opera-tor, and to reduce inadvertent activa-tion of keys, (1) Key displacement should be as shown in Exhibit 6. 7-4.
(2) Key resistance should be as shown in Exhibit 6. 7-4.
- f. POSITIVE INDICATION - To provide I NO 20000309 II-7 positive key actuation feedback to the operator, a definite indication should be provided (e.g., snap, feel, audible click,
- release of resistance).
- g. KEYBOARD SLOPE - Keyboards o NO 20A00316 Il'-7 should have a slope between 150 and 250 from the horizontal (see Exhibit
- 6. 7-5),
- h. VISUAL FEEDBACK - Data being o NO 20A00317 II-7 entered via keyboards should be dis-played as it is keyed.
- i. RELEVANT* KEYS - The presence of 0 tiES nonrelevant keys, such as those that might be used by programmer person-nel, adds to keyboard complexity and induces operator errors. Control room keyboards should contain only those keys which are used by operators.
6.7.1.5 COMPUTER FUNCTION CONTROLS
- a. CONTROL DESIGN - When dedicated o ns controls are used for selection of com-puter or di.splay functions or modes, the design of the controls should conform to the appropriate guidelines specified in Section 6.4, Controls .
177
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 29
- GUIDELINE
~
~
I ~~~;.$ I g;
!!to~'/
If __________.....;;;:;,;,;;,,:,;~---....:..----+-~F--+--.;....+-----f-------;
- 6. 7.1.5 (Cont'd)
I C,j
,~
~
/
- b. LABELING AND NOMENCLATURE - 0 !YES Terms, nomenclature, and abbreviations used on function controls should be the same as or consistent with the terms, nomenclature, and abbreviations of the computer function which is selected or displayed.
- c. MASTER CONTROL - When CR Ts are N/A ~/A subject to operation by centrally located master controls, a positive indication should be provided:
(1) At the master-control location to
- N/A ~/A identify those displays under local or master control.
(2) At the individual CRT to indicate ~IA 'iJ./A whether the display is under master or local control.
- d* FUNCTION CONTROLS (1)
(2) When dedicated controls are used to initiate/activate functions, the keys should be grouped together. Function controls should be easily 0 0 [{ES t.rES distinguished from other types of keys on the computer console. (3) Each function control should be 0 fES clearly labeled to indicate its function to the operator. (4) If multiple computer consoles 0 "ES exist in the control room, the design and layout of the function controls should be consistent for all consoles . 178
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&. HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 29
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _GUIDELINE 6.7.L5d (Cont'd)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _....,.._....,.._ _'f'-_ _ _ -+---+--------"'(I (5) When function keys are included 0 YES with an alphanumeric keyboard, the function keys shou~d be physi-cally separate. (Avoid multiple-mode keyboards which utilize the same keys for both alphanumerics and functions by using "shift" keys or mode selection control&.) 6.7.1.6
- OTHER CONTROL DEVICES
- a. LOCATION - *The control devices 0 YES should be operable from the location where the operator is most likely to need to interact with the computer
.(e.g., keyboard, computer console, dis-play screen).
- b. SPEED - The control device should NIAN/A provide rapid positioning of cursors or selection of choices .
- c. ACCURACY - Device or method N/A N/A accuracy should be commensurate with the functions to be served.
- d. DISPLACEMENT - Control design 0 YES should allow the operator freedom of movem*ent to perform other duties.
6.7.1.7 COMPUTER RESPONSE TIME TO OPERATOR QUERIES
- a. MAXIMIZE RESPONSE TIMES - The I NO 20000301 I-7 computer system should provide the
_correct response to each type of query within the recommended response times listed in Exhibit 6. 7-6.
- b. RESPONSE DELAY MESSAGES -When I NO 20000301 I-7 response* time for any query exceeds 3 seconds, a delay message should be presented to maintain the operator's attention and to confirm normal com-puter operation. (See also Guideline 6.7.2.6.)
179
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 29
- 6. 7.1.8 ACCESS AIDS GUIDELINE h~~; ~-;
~
~
I C,i
~
g;
~ I
~ 41 gt~
~
CJ If
~
'1
~
~
~
7
/3., COMPUTER SYSTEM PROCEDURES (1) A compute set of comP,rlter sys- I NO 20000302 11-7 tern operating procedures and contingency procedures should be available in the control room.
(2) Procedures should be prepared D YES from the point of view of the control room operator. (3) Prooedures should be in hardcopy D YES form as a minimum. (4) Operating procedures should describe:
* (a) The overall computer system. D YES (b) The computer system compo- D YES nents with which the operator
- can interface .
(c) The specific procedures neces-sary to accomplish all of the opera tor-computer interface functions. D YES (5) Contingency procedures should describe: (a) Indications available to the D YES operator which identify failure or malfunctioning of the com-puter system. (b) Necessary actions to be per- I NO 20000302 II-7 formed by the operator if the computer fails or malfunc-tions. 180
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED* Page 8 of 29
- 6. 7.1.8 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
~
If
~&!
~
#~
~
~
~ ~
, ~
~.".~
~
I; I I q:
~
,I 7
- b. DAT A POINT INDICES (1) The specific codes, or addresses, I NO 20000304* II-7 by which data displays can be called up by an operator should be cross-indexed by:
(a) Alphanumeric or numeric code (b) Program name (c) System/subsystem identifica-tion (d) Functional group identifica-tion. (2) Cross-indices should be available I INO 20000304 II-7 in the control room in hardcopy form as a minimum .
- 6.7.2.1 CRT DISPLAY CHARACTERISTICS
- a. READABILITY - Alphanumeric and graphic characters should be easily readable by the operator under all con-trol room lighting conditions.
I INO 20000303 CPT
- b. REFLECTED GLARE - CRT screens 0 IYES should be installed to minimize or eliminate reflected glare at normal operator viewing angles.
- c. SCREEN LUMINANCE
- (1) Ambient illumination should con- 0 IYES tribute no more than 2596 to screen luminance through diffuse reflection and phosphor excita-tion, (2)
- When ambient illumination in the NIA NIA vicinity of the CRT is in the medium to high range (see Guide-line 6.1.5.3), the CRT should use dark characters and symbols on a
- light background .
181
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 29
- V/'/ ~I I
,, I; ~
~ ~ I ~ ti
&UIDELIIIIE I I $I ~
~
6.7.2.lc (Cont'd) (3) When the CRT uses dark charac- NIA NIA ters on a light background, the screen background luminance should be 23 foot-Lamberts (ft-L) minimum and 46 ft-L preferred (4) When the CRT uses light charac- 0 YES ters on a dark background, the character luminance should be 23 ft-L minimum and 46 ft-L prefer-red.
- d. LUMINANCE CONTRAST (1) Contract between light charac- 0 YES ters and a dark screen background should be 15:1 minimum and 20:1 preferred.
(2) Contrast between dark characters NIA NIA and a light screen background should be 1:15 minimum and 1:20 preferred.
- e. GEOMETRIC DISTORTION - The 0 YES cumulative effects of all geometric distortion should not displace any point within the viewable area of the screen from its correct position by more than 596 of picture height.
- f. RESOLUTION - Discrimination of fine detail is a function of the number of scan lines or addressable points ("reso-lution elements") per unit length.
(1) CRTs for displaying simple alpha- 0 YES numeric text should have a mini-mum of 20 resolution elements per inch. (2) CRTs for displaying complex NIA NIA symbols and graphic detail should have a minimum of 100 resolution elements per inch . 182
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 10 of 29
- 6. 7.2.lf (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE *
~
YJ~! I~ ~
~
f:
~
~
I 4' I ~
~
~
~
~
4li'
~
~
I (3) Complex symbols which must be NIA NIA distinguished from other complex shapes should have e. minimum of 10 resolution elements for the longest dimension of the symbol. (4) Alpha.numeric che.re.cters should M YES have e. minimum of 1 O resolution elements per che.re.cter height.
- g. . REGENERATION RATE - The regen- NIA NIA era tion re. te for a particular CRT dis-play should be above the critical fre-quency at fusion so that the occurrence of disturbing fli~ker is not perceptible.
- h. CRT DISPLAY CONTROLS (1) Parameters such as luminance 0 YES (brightness), contrast, and color should be adjustable by the con-trol room operator.
(2) Adjustment controls should con- 0 YES form to the appropriate guidelines in Section 6.4, Controls, and Section 6.9, Control-Display Inte-gration. 6.7~2.2 SYMBOLS AND CHARACTERS
- a. SYMBOL SIZE - When a displayed NIA NIA symbol of complex shape is to be dis-tinguished from another symbol shape that is also complex, the visual angle of the symbol should subtend not less than 20 minutes of arc at the required viewing distance.
- b. ALPHANUMERIC CHARACTER SIZE
( 1)
- The height of alphanumeric char- M YES acters should have a visual angle of not less than 12 minutes of arc at the required viewing distance .
183
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEi>s GENERATED Page 11 of 29
- ---.. . . ------------------+---+-----+
- 6. 7.2.2b {Cont'd)
GUIDELINE I ~
~ I/
9: II $/~~1/ If
~
7 (2) Alphanumeric characters should O YES be uppercase letters. ,
/
- c. CHARACTER WIDTH~O-HEIGHT M YES RATIO - The width-to-height ratio for alphanumerics should be between 3:5 and 1:1 ..
- d. STROKE-WIDTH~O-CHARACTER-HEIGHT M YES RATIO :-- Stroke-width-to-character-height ratio should be*between 1:5 and 1:10.
- e. GRAPIDCS - A graphic line will NIA NIA appear continuous if the separation between addressable points, or resolu-tion elements, is less than one minute of arc. To provide the illusion of conti-nuity, graphic lines should contain a minimum of 50 resolution elements per inch .
- f. CHARACTER AND SYMBOL SEP ARA-TION (1) Horizontal separation between
*. characters or symbols should be between 10% and 65% of char-acter or symbol height.
M !YES (2) Separation should be not less than NIA IN/A 25% of character or symbol height when any of the following degraded conditions exists: (a) When character or symbol NIA NIA width is less than 85% of height; (b) When character or symbol N/A N/A lµminance is less than 12 ft-L;
* (c) When luminance contrast is NIA NIA less than 88%;
(d) When CRT screen location is NIA ~IA* greater than 350 to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead line of sight; 184
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 12 of 29
- 6. 7.2.2f(2) (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE l (e) When the visu.al angle sub- NO. N/A tended by symbol height is less than 15 minutes of arc; (f) When the visual angle sub- NO. N/A tended by character height is less than 12 minutes of arc.
- g. CHARACTER STYLE (FONT)
(1) Simple character fonts should be 0 YES used, with no serifs, variable stroke widths, slanting, etc. (2) When dot-matrix characters are 0 YES used, 7x9 dot-matrix should be used in preference to 5x7 dot-matrix. (3) Character styles such as Lincoln/ 0 YES Mitre or Leroy should be used . 6.7.2.3 OPERATOR-DISPLAY RELATION-SHIPS
- a. VIEWING DISTANCE - Viewing dis- M YES tance should be greater than 18 inches.
- b. VIEWING ANGLE - The minimum M YES angle between the operator's actual line-of-sight (LOS) as measured from the operator's normal work station, and the plane of the display screen should be 450 or greater in either the hori-zontal or vertical direction. See Exhibits 6. 7-8 and 6. 7-1 O.
- c. SCREEN LOCATION, SEATED OPERATORS (1) CRT displays which require fre- NIA NIA
. quent or continuous monitoring, or which may display important (e.g., alarm) information, should be located within the following limits as measured from the nor mal operator work station (see Exhibit 6. 7-9):
185
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 13 of 29
- GUIDELINE
---------------------+-+--~----+--+--------"'I
- 6. 7.2.3c (Cont'd) llll/$1 III I I (a) Horizontal limits - Not more NIA NIA than 350 to the left or right of the opera tor's straight-ahead LOS. "
(b) Vertical limits - Not more NIA NIA than 200 above and 400 below the operator's horizontal LOS. (2) CRT displays which do not require NIA NIA frequent or continuous moni-toring, and which will not display important (e.g., alarm) informa-tion, should be located within the following limits (as measured from normal operator work sta-tions which permit full operator head and eye rotation). See Exhibit 6. 7-1 O):
~IA (a) Horizontal limits - Not more NIA than 95° to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS.
(b) Vertical limits - Not more NIA ~IA than 700 above and 900 below the operator's horizontal LOS.
- d. SCREEN LOCATION, STANDING OPERATORS (1) CRT displays which require fre-quent or continuous monitoring, or which may display important (e.g., alarm) information, should be located within the following limits as measured from the nor-mal operator work station:
(a) Horizontal limits - Not more M !YES than 350 to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits - Not more M rEs than 350 above and 250 below the operator's horizontal LOS . 186
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS c5c HEDs GENERATED Page 14 of 29
- 1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _o_u,_oe_u_Ne_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-4--/J__;;../,_i'J_~_,--_ 6.7.2.3d (Cont'd)
+!.__°"_~.. . ;./_G-+~-..;.f_~-j~f-;____ --f/
l_l_"__ (2) CRT displays which do not require M YES frequent or continuous moni-toring, and, which will not display important (e.g., alarm) informa-tion, should be. located within the following limits (as measured from normal operator work sta-tions which permit full operator head and eye rotation): (a) Horizontal limits - Not more M YES than 950 to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits - Not more M YES than aso above and 900 below the operator's horizontal LOS.
- e. MOUNTING IN CONSOLES - When 0 YES CR Ts are permanently mounted in con-soles, the console configuration, dimen-sions, and type of use (such as seated,*
sit-stand, or standing) affects the CRT/operator interface. Consoles in which CR Ts are installed should con-
- form to the guidelines of Section 6.1.2.
- f. VISIBILITY OF DATA - All data and 0 YES messages on the CRT screen should be within the unobstructed view of an operator at the normal work station.
6.7.2.4 DATA PRESENTATION FORMAT
- a. USABILITY OF DATA (1) Data should be presented to the 0 YES operator in a readily usable for-mat.
(2)
- There should be no requirement 0 YES for transposing, computing, inter-polating, or mentally translating displayed data into other units or numerical bases .
187
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 15 of 29
- 6. 'l .2.4 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE
/)~&~
~
~
~
I.:: ~
~ #
I 4t Ill ~
'l'
~
I
- b. ILLUSTRATIONS - Illustrations should NIA NIA be used whenever possible to supple-ment or explain text.
- c. CHARACTER GROUPING (1) When 5 or more digits and/or non- 0 YES text alphanumerics are displayed, and no natural (i.e., population stereotyped} organization exists, characters should be grouped in blocks of 3 to 4 characters each. \
(2) Groups should be separated by a 0 YES minimum of 1 blank character space.
- d. MAINTENANCE OF ORDERING - 0 Y.cS Elements in a data field should be dis-played in logical order (e.g., chrono-logical} .
- e. PRESENTATION OF IDENTICAL DATA (1} The manner of presentation of identical data should be based on the uses to which the data will be put by the operator.
0 YES (2) Within the limits of (1) above, 0 YES identical data'in different presen-tations should be displayed in a consistent, standardized manner.
- f. MENU DESIGNATORS (1} Numbers should be used as desig- NIA NIA nators when listing selectable items.
(2) Numerical designators should NIA NIA
- start with the number 11 111 (not zero} .
- 188
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 16 or 29
- 6. 7..2.4f (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE " j'~//~~
~~ 11~
§
~ I~
la I
~
;:
"I; I
~
~
(3) If the use of num.bers as designa- NIA NIA tors would create confusion because of other numbers which make up the item to be desig-nated, alphabetic characters should be used. (4) When used, alphabetic designators NIA NIA should start with the letter "A."
- g. LISTS (1) ~ists should be vertically aligned 0 YES and left-justified.
(2) Indentation should be used for NIA NIA subclassifications.
- h. TABLES AND GRAPHS - Quantitative 0 YES da.ta which must be scanned and com-pared should be presented in either tabular or graphic form .
- i. HYPHENATION - The use of hyphena- 0 YES tion should. be minimized.
- j. ALIGNMENT (1) When presented in tabular form, 0 YES alphanumeric data should .be left-justified.
(2) When presented in tabular form, 0 NO 20A00319 11-7 numeric data should be right-justified with decimal points aligned.
- k. PERIODS - Periods should be placed NIA NIA after item selection designators and at the end o{ a sentence .
189
l TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 'l of 29
- 6. 7.2.4 {Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
~
~
~~!
~
I CJ
~
!11
~
~~
I
~
!& I #
(!
#;
~
~
qa
~
1
- 1. STANDARDIZED FIELDS - The fol-lowing standardized fields should be used: !
/
' (1)
- Telephone Number: {914)555-1212 NI.A NIA (2) Time: HH:MM:SS, HH:MM, 0 YES MM:SS:(.S)
(3) Date: MM:DD:YY. 0 YES
- m. DATA GROUP LABELING (1)
- Each individual data group or 0 YES message should have a descriptive title.
I (2) Labels should reflect some unique 0 YES characteristic of the content of
, the data group or message:
- n.
o. LABEL PLACEMENT - Labels should be located in a consistent manner either above or to the left of the data group or message they describe. LABEL ORIENTATION - be oriented horizontally. Labels sho.uld 0 0 YES YES
- p. LABEL IIlGHLIGHTING (1) Labels should be highlighted or 0 NO 20A00320 II-7 otherwise accentuated to facili-tate operator scanning and recog-nition.
(2) The technique used to highlight 0 NO 20A00320 II-7 labels should be easily distin-guished from that used to high-ligh~ emergency or critical mes-sages.
'q, OPTION LABELS - When presenting a NIA NIA list of operator options, the label should reflect the question or choices being *,
posed to the operator.* 190
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 18 of 29
- GUIDELINE 6.7.2.5 SCREEN LAYOUT AND
~
~ Y.// . ///
~
~
iiI ~
~
I~ I
~
I STRUCTURING
- a. ORGANIZATION OF DATA (1) Displayed data should be organ- o. YES ized in a logical, consistent man-ner.
(2) Displayec.1 data should reflect 0 YES some obvious and inherent quality of the data groups (e.g., hier-archical, sequential, or mimic relationships).
- b. LOCATION OF DATA GROUPS- 0 YES Physical location of specific data groups (e.g., alarms, menus) on *the screen should be consistent.
- c. DEMARCATION OF DATA 0 YES SUBGROUPS - Organization and sepa-ration of information subgroups should be made apparent to the operator through the use of blank spaces, lines, or some other form of visible demarca-tion.
- d. USE FREQUENCY RANKING - Lists NIA NIA.
of options should be organized according to the probability of selec-tion for each item, with high proba-bility items presented first.
- e. ALPHANUMERIC RANKING - Non- NIA NIA option lists of equal-probability options should be presented in alphabetical or numerical order.
- f. SEPARATION OF PARAGRAPHS - NIA NIA Paragraphs in continuous text should be separated. by at least one blank line.
- g. SELECTION DESIGNATORS -Selec- NIA NIA tion designators 1n menus should be separated from text descriptors by at least one blank space. *,
191
l TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 19 or 29
- 6. 7.2.5 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
~
I! i// ///
,?
If 'JI,
~~
~ - ~$
;:,
I
~
~
I- -
- h. PAGE DESIGNATION - When data are NIA NIA contained on multiple pages, each page should display both page nurpber and total number of pages.
- i. CONTINUOUS NUMBERING - Items NIA NIA contained in a numbered list and described on 11 continue 11 pages should be numbered relative to the first number on the first page of the list.
- j. PLACEMENT OF INSTRUCTIONS - NIA NIA When directions to the operator accom-pany a list of options, such directions should precede presentation of the list.
- k. URGENT MESSAGES (1) Urgent messages requiring imme- 0 NO 20A00320 II-7 diate operator response should be I 20000311 II-7 highlighted to attract the opera-tor's attention.
(2) Urgent messages should always be I NO 20000311 II-7 displayed in the same location.
- 1. USE OF CURSOR - In systems in NIA NIA which selection is made by use of a cursor, formats should be organized to minimize positioning movements of tl'le cursor.
- m. SCREEN -LOADING - The amount of 0 YES information-bearing activated screen area should not exceed 25% of the total screen area. This does not include demarcation lines used to separate groups of data.
192
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 20 of 29
- GUIDELINE t!
~
y:// .I
§~
I
;:::#
._,~
~
~
~
~;
/1 8
Ci'
,~
7
- 6. 7.2.5 (Cont'd)
- n. TREND PLOT SCALES - CRT dis- Nil NIA played trend plot scales should be con-sistent with the intended functional use of the data. (For example, the moni-toring of neutron flux at reactor trip may have a variable scale of 096 to 196 of the design value and a time scale resolution of seconds. However, post-trip monitoring may have a variable scale of 096 to 1096 with a time scale resolution of minutes. Finally, opera-tional log data of neutron flux may have a time scale resolution of hours.)
6.7.2.6 MESSAGES
- a. MESSAGES, GENERAL (1) Messages should be concise. NIA NIA (2) Messages should provide the oper- NIA NIA ator with the information neces-:-
sary to complete a specific action or decision sequence.
- b. MESSAGE CONTENT - Information NIA NIA contained in messages should be neces-sary, complete, and readily usable.
- c. USE OF PROMPTS - Prompts should NI) NIA be displayed whenever the operator may need directions or guidance to initiate or complete an action or sequence of actions.
- d. _ CONTENT OF PROMPTS - Prompts NIA NIA should contain clear and specific cues and instructions which are relevant to the action to be taken.
- e. PROMPT INFORMATION NIA NIA SEQUENCE - Directions should be placed in the sequence to be used by the operator.
193
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&. HEDs GENERATED Page 21 of 29
- 6. 7.2.6 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE
~
~
~
,f:
Y./ E, I( II
- $
~
~
I 41 G Ill ~
~
~
~
7
- f. USE OF ERROR MESSAGES -When- 0 YES ever an operator error or invalid input is detected, an error message should be displayed.
- g. ERROR CORRECTION GUIDANCE - 0 YES Error messages should contain instruc-tions to the operator regarding l'equired corrective action.
- h. ERROR CORRECTION EASE - Capa- 0 YES bility should be provided for operator correction of individual errors without affecting adjacent valid entries.
- i. SYSTEM STATUS FEEDBACK 0 !YES MESSAGES - Feedback messages should be provided to the operator to indicate changes in the status of system functioning.
- j. SELECTION FEEDBACK - When a displayed message or datum is selected as an option or input to the system, the subject item should be highlighted, or otherwise positively identified, to indi-cate acknowledgement by the system.
NIA IN/A
- k. DELAY FEEDBACK - When system 0 INO 20A00321 Il-:7 functioning requires the operator to stand by, such as when the computer is searching for requested data, periodic feedback should be provided to the operator to indicate normal system operation and. the reason for the delay.
- 1. ACTMTY COMPLETION 0 ~o 20A00321 II-7 FEEDBACK - When a process or sequence is completed by the system, positive in.dication should be presented to the opera tor concerning the outcome of th~ process and requirements for subsequent operator actions .
194
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&. HEDs GENERATED Page 22 of 29
- GUIDELINE 6.7.2.7 GRAPHIC CODING AND HIGH-LIGHTING
- a. USE OF HIGHLIGHTING -Highlighting 0 NO 20A00320 II-7 should be used to attract the operator's attention to any displayed data item or message which is important to decision-making or action requirements.
- b. CONSISTENT APPROACH (1) Highlighting methods which have NIA NIA information value beyond their attention-getting quality should have the same meaning in all applications.
(2) Highlighting methods associated NIA NIA with emergency conditions should not also be used in association with normal conditions.
. NIA NIA
- c. CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT - When contrast enhancement (i.e., increased illumination intensity level) is used for highlighting, not more than two (prefer-able) or three (maximum) brightness levels should be used in a single presen-tation.
- d. FLICKER OR BLINKING - Blinking of NIA NIA a symbol or message (e.g., ON-OFF or alternating high-low brightness) for purposes of highlighting should be reserved for emergency conditions or similar situations requiring immediate operator action.
- e. BLINK RATES (1) When blinking is used for high- NIA NiA lighting, a maximum of 2 blink rates should be used.
(2) When a single blank rate is used, NIA NIA the rate should approximate 2 to 3 11 blinks 11 per second with a mini- *, mum of 50 msec 11 on 11 time betwe-en blinks . 195
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 23 of 29
- GUIDELINE
-----------------------+--t---+------f---t--------;
- 6. 7.2. 7e (Cont'd)
I (3) When 2 blink rates are used, the NIA NIA fast blink should approximate 4 per second and the slo~ blink should approximate 1 per second. (4) When 2 blink rates are used, the NIA NIA "on-off" ratio should approximate 5096. (5) When 2 blink rates are used, the NIA NIA higher rate should apply to the most critical information.
- f. INVERSE VIDEO - Image reversal NIA NIA (e.g., dark characters on a light back-ground) should be used primarily for highlighting in dense data fields, such as a word or phrase in a paragraph of text, or a set of characters in a table of data .
- g. USE OF GRAPIDC CODING - Graphic coding methods (e.g., symbols, boxes, underlines, colors) should be used to present standard qualitative infor-mation to the operator or to draw the operator's attention to a particular portion of the display.
NIAN/A
- h. GRAPIDC CODE CONSISTENCY - NIA NIA Grapl')ic codes, used separately or in combination, should have the same meaning in all applications.
- i. GEOMETRIC SHAPE CODING - When NIA NIA geometric shape (symbol) coding is used, the basic symbols should vary .
widely in shape.
- j. NUMBER OF SYMBOLS (1)
- The number of basic symbols used NIA NIA for coding should be kept small.
(2) The upper limit under. optimum NIA NIA display conditions should be 20 . 196
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 24 o! 29
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _s_u,_oE_u_Ne_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- 6. 7.2. 7j (Cont'd)
,...ll__l,_0_~_1...__l-+~; ____~_l_~__--f/
__~_~_/_G--+~--$_1'_~,..; (3) The upper limit under adverse NIA NIA display conditions should be 6. (4) When needed, other highlighting NIA NIA and graphic techniques (color, filled versus unfilled, and other "modifiers") should be used to display different states or quali-ties of a basic symbol.
- k. USE OF COLOR - (Exhibit 6. 7-11)
(1) Colors used on the CRT to convey NIA NIA information should be consistent in use and meaning with all other color codes in the control room. (2) Once colors are assigned a spe- NIA NIA cific use or meaning, no other color should be used for the same purpose .
- 1. COLOR MEANINGS - When color is used, the meaning of the colors should, where applicable, equate with the com-monly understood meaning of those colors. The following specific meanings for selected colors should apply when these colors are used in CRT displays:
(1) Red - Unsafe condition, danger, NIA NIA immediate operator action required, or critical parameter value out of tolerance. _(2) Green - Safe condition, no oper- NIA NIA ator action required, or para-meter value is within tolerance. (3) YellpwlAmber - Hazard, poten- NIA NIA tially unsafe, caution, attention
- required; marginal parameter value exists .
197
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 25 of 29
- 6. 7.2. 7 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE tf
.. v.// ///
~
i::, I I
,;,
~ 4I
~
G it lP I
- m. RED-GREEN COMBINATIONS (1) Whenever possible, rec;1' and green NO NIA colors should not be used in com-bination.
(2) Use of red symbols/characters on NO NIA a green background should espe-cially be avoided. 6.7.2.8 MULTIPLE-PAGE CONSIDERA-TIONS
- a. OPERATOR MEMORY .
(1) Page design and content planning NIA NIA should minimize requirements for operator memory. (2) All data relevant to a specific NIA NIA operator entry should be displayed on a single page.
- b. AUDIT TRAIL - When pages are NIA NIA organized in a hierarchical fashion, containing a number of different paths through the series, a visual audit trail of the choices should be available upon operator request.
- c. LOCATION REFERENCES (1) When the operator is required to NIA NIA scroll or pan on a large logical frame, location references should be provided in the viewable por-tion of the frame. (For example, when scrolling a list, any part of which is visible at any one time, the present and maximum loca-tion should be shown.)
(2) Sectional coordinates should be NIA NIA used when large schematics must be panned or magnified . 198
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 26 of 29
- 6. 7.2.8 (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE ~
§
~
~~; i5 II I
** G
~I
-t' 4i' Is I G l!
G I
~
{I I
- d. OPERATOR CONTROL - The opera- NIA NIA tor should have some capability for controlling the amount, format, and complexity of information (e.g., core dumps, program outputs, error mes-sages) being displayed by the system.
- e. LOCATION CONSISTENCY- If the NIA NIA message is a variable option list, com-mon elements should maintain their physical relationship to other recurring elements.
6.7.3.1 PRINTER CHARACTERISTICS
- a. PRINTER APPLICATIONS (1) Printers should be part of the 0 YES process computer system and be located in the primary operating area .
(2) Control room printers should 0 YES provide the capability to record alarm data, trend data, and plant status data.
- b. DISPLAY COPIES (1) The system should, if possible, be 0 YES designed to provide hardcopy of any page appearing on the CRT at the request of the operator.
(2) If the copy will be printed remote 0 YES to the operator, a print confirma- _tion or denial message should be displayed. (3) Pri~ter operation should not alter 0 YES screen content.
- c. FORM OF PRINTED INFORMATION - 0 YES Printed information should be presented in a directly usable form with minimal **,
requirements for decoding, transposing, and interpolating . 199
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 27 of 29
- 6. 7.3.1 {Cont'd)
GUIDELINE
~
"1/I la" I
~
I
~
,l'
,;:, I
~~
,7!
~
,t;
~
~
~
I
- d. PRINTER SPEED - Pr.inters used for I ~o 20000305 11-7 recording trend data, computer alarms, 0 20A00322 11-7 and critical status information should have a high-speed printing capability of at least 300 lines a minute to permit printer output to keep up with com-puter output.
- e. PRINTER OPERATION - Paper, rib-bons, and ink (if used) should be con-sistent with the following:
(1) Hard-finish matte paper should be I ~o 20000308 III-9 used to avoid smudged copy and glare. (2) There should be a positive indica- 0 rtES tion of the remaining supply of recording materials. (3) Instructions for reloading paper, I N'O 20000306 II-7 ribbon, ink, etc., should appear on 0 20A00323 II-7 an instruction plate attached to the printer. (4) When the printer is down during I N'O 20000305 II-7 reloading, data and information which would normally be printed must not be lost. (5) A takeup device for printed mate- I rn 20000307 II-7 rials should be provided which 0 20A00324 II-7 requires little or no opera tor attention and which has a capac-ity at lease equal to the feed supply .
- f. . PRINT COPY ACCESSIBILITY - The following features should be provid~d to enhance operator accessibility of printed material:
(1) Provisions should be made so that 0 ~o 20A00325 II-7 the operator can always read the most recently printed line. ,. 200
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 28 of 29
- 6.7.3.lf (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE
/;~&!
~~
*" I iiI
$ I
;if
~I I ~
I , I
~
(2) Printed material should have an 0 NO 20A00326 II-7 adequate contrast ratio to ensure. easy operator reading. (3) It should be possible to annotate 0 YES the print copy while it is still in the machine. (4) The recorded matter should not 0 NO 20A00325 n-7 be obscured, masked, or otherwise hidden in a manner which pre-vents direct reading of. the mate-rial. 6.7.3.2 ALARM MESSAGES
- a. ALARM RECORDS (1) A printer should be provided for 0 YES recording alarm. messages .
- b.
(2) All annunciator alarms should be recorded. ALARM SEQUENCE - Alarm mes-sages should be recorded in the
,sequence of their occurrence.
0 0 YES YES C, OPERATOR-REQUESTED 0 NO 20A00327 II-7 PRINTOUT - Provisions should be included to provide, upon operator request, printouts by alarm group (e.g., system, subsystem, component).
- d. ALARM IDENTIFICATION - Alarm I NO 20000312 II-6
- messages spould be readily distinguish- 0 20A00328 II-7 able from other messages.
- e. ALARM DISCRIMINATION - Alarm .. 0 YES messages.should provide rapid identifi-cation of the nature of the alarm.
- f. CONSISTENT TERMINOLOGY -
Wording in alarm messages should: (1) Clearly relate to the specific I NO 20000313 ll-7 annunciator tile that is illumi-nated . 201
TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS c5c HEDs GENERATED Page 29 of 29
- 6. 'l .3.2f (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE "
&: 0~! la I
~
!::j
~
;s#
g; II ~I
-lt"4l 4!
9l
~
CJ ti 4!~
~
~
~
I (2) Contain at least that information I NO 20000313 II-'l (i.e., wording) presented in the illuminated annunciatof tile. (3) Provide additional specific data. 0 YES
.6.'l.3.3 GRAPH AND TABLE REQUIRE-MENTS
- a. SHAPE OF FUNCTION - If the gen- 0 YES eral shape of the function is important in making decisions, a graph should be used.
- b. INTERPOLATION - If interpolation is N/A NIA necessary, line graphs are preferable to bar graphs and tables.
- c. GRIDS (1) Graphs should be constructed so 0 YES that numbered grids are bolder than unnumbered grids.
(2) If 10-grid intervals are used, the 0 YES fifth intermediate grid should be less bold than the numbered grid, but bolder than the unnumbered grids.
- d. TABLES (1) Tables should be simple, concise, 0 YES and readable.
(2) When table columns are long, 0 NO 20A00329 II-7 numbers should be separated into groups by providing a space between groups of five. (3) When columns are not separated 0 NO 20A00330 II-7
- by vertical lines, the columns should be separated by at least 2 character widths .
202
- 4.0 SYSTEM FUNCTIONS REVIEW AND TASK ANALYSIS AND VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION 4.1 System Functions Review and Task Analysis The objectiyes of the system functions review and task analysis were:
- a. To develop a plant-specific task analysis data base from generic task analytic background information and generic emergency response guide-lines.
- b. To identify operator action and information requirements from the plant-specific task analysis for those tasks performed under emergency conditions which provide emergency response capabilities.
- c. Prepare for task verification and validation which would assess the suitability of the control room design in supporting task performance.
4.1.2 Approach To accomplish the above objectives, Revision 1 of the Westinghouse Owners' Group Emergency Response Guidelines (WOG-ERGs) and the four-volume set of background documents were used. In accordance with the NRC-WOG meeting of 29 March 1984, the WOG-ERGs, Revision 1, are considered a validated data base which defines the generic plant systems and functions (including the primary action/information requirements) and allocates the functions between the human and the machine. The system function review and task analysis was performed in two major steps. First, generic data were developed based on the ERGs and background documents (Rev 1). Second, the data was made plant-specific by reviewing the ERGs with operations personnel to determine the action and information requirements for operators to perform each step. Plant setpoint documents, Emergency Response Tracking documents and step
- sequence -tracking documents developed by Virginia Electric and Power Company's Nuclear Operations Department (NOD) to track each ERG step to its associated procedure step were also used to develop the plant-specific action and information requirements.
During verification, the actual Surry Power Station instruments and controls that were used to perform these functions were identified. If the control and/or instrument did not conform to the requirements of the task analysis, a Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) Report was prepared
- 203
- 4.1.2.1 Procedure The task analysis procedure developed by Essex Corporation extracted generic operator action and information requirements from the Westinghouse Owners' Group Emergency Response Guidelines and Background documents, converted the requirements to a plant-specific level and documented the results for use in the verification process.
The following paragraphs briefly describe the procedural details. 4.1.2.2 Action-Information Requirements Details (AIRD} AIRD forms (see Figure 4-1) were prepared by Essex Corporation for each step, caution sta,tement, and note in Revision 1 of the Emergency Response Guidelines (ERGs) and all the Function Restoration Guidelines. Essex staff identified all behavioral elements for each task and listed each element in the AIRD Behavior Element Table. A behavioral element is defined by the various behavioral and physical properties of an action requirement or an information requirement. Review of the AIRD forms was conducted by Surry Power Station operations personnel to modify instrument and control requirements as necessary. Plant-specific setpoints were added, and the generic task analysis was made plant-specific .
- 4.1.2.3 Action-Information Requirements Summary (AIRS}
All behavioral elements of a given type, independent of the ERG, ERG step or task
- in which they appear w.ere collected on the AIRS forms (see Figure 4-2). Then, based on the information entered onto the AIRS form, the action or information requirements for the given behavioral element were entered in the summary of requirements block on each AIRS form. This for med the basis for an instrument and control specification~
In-service inspection valve response times were also listed in the requirements summary block for valves which are safety related by function. This was done to identify infrequently operated safety-related valves that have an actual stroke time significantly different from operator expectations. Identifying these valves will alert the operator of unusual response times and therefore avoid the potential for confusion* 204
- - ~ ~---------------- -- - * - - - - - - - - - ~ - - -
ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAIL (AIRD) Sheet _ _ _ ot - - - - PLANT: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___..;._ _ __ UNIT: _ _ _ __ ORIGINATOR: _ _ _ _ __ DATE: - - - - - - - - ERG NO: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ REVIEWER: _ _ _ _ __ DATE: - - - - - - - - STEP NO: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ STEP O B J E C T I V E : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REMARKS: BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS
/ l,j J Component/
Equipment No. I I I ~ I ~fl .7 Parameter
- Direction j
~
;! ll
- ,f
~
~
C ~J:t Ii! 4./ ,.._!J . Command FIGURE 4-1 SAMPLE AIRD FORM
ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
SUMMARY
(AIRS) Sheet _ _ of - - - P L A N T : - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNIT: _ __ DATE: _ _ _ _ _ __ ORIGINATOR:------ DATE: _ _ _ _ _ __ SORT BLOCK ----------------.
SUMMARY
OF REQUIREMENTS BLOCK REVIEWER: - - - - - - - VERIFICATION
SUMMARY
BLOCK REOS TYPE: Act _ _ _ _ Info _ __ VALUE/RANGE:-------- SYSTEM: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ DEVICE UNITS: - - - - - - - - - - - PASS FAIL COMPONENT: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ PRECISION: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ I.D. No PANEL PARAMETER: RESPONSE TIME: INDIVIDUAL DETAILS I ti* ii 1 /. .~ I** *~ l***w l11/
~-kl/ Verb Direction Range Rate Comments FIGURE 4*2 SAMPLE AIRS FORM
- 4.2 Verification of Component Availability and Suitability The objectives of this effort were to identify availability (presence) and suitability of required instrumentation and controls in the control room to support performance of system functions.
The basic criteria were: (1) the control and display designs should match the task needs and operator capabilities, (2) frequently required or important instrumentation or controls should be located in the control room, and (3) infrequently used or unimportant controls and instrumeritation should be excluded from the primary panel locations in the control room. During the weeks of April 1 and April 22, 1985, verification of equipment availability was performed by one human factors specialist, one Surry Operations Coordinator with SRO license, and an ex-SRO with four years of experience in human factors. This analysis was accomplished by comparing the action and information requirements on the AIRS forms to the control room inventory as shown on a half-scale, color photomosaic of the Surry Power Station control room. During the verification exercises, the following component availability and suit-ability questions were asked of the operators: Is all the information you require present in the control to perform the task(s)? Are all needed controls provided to perform the task(s)? Do the controls and displays provide the appropriate range of information/ control?
- Are the controls and displays adequate in terms of precision and response time?
All findings discrepant from NUREG-0700 guidelines were documented in the form of HED reports. 4.2.1 Verify Human Engineering Suitability The objective of this effort was to identify man-machine interface problems that may affect task performance, but that may not be evident in component surveys. There are five major design issues: (1) component suitability, i.e., whether each required component provides the appropriate range, precision, scale units, and response time; (2) the grouping of components with respect to function, sequence, importance, and frequency-of-use criteria; (3) control and display integration to ensure that associated 207
i controls and displays are not dispersed and that their designs are compatible; (4) compo-nent discrimination through enhancements such as demarcation and coding techniques; and (5) panel l_ayouts for consistency of conventions across all panels/units. Verification of human engineering suitabiHty was performed (1) during the verifica-tion of component availability and suitability effort using* the photomosaic at the Essex facility, and (2) during walk-through/talk-throughs of event sequences at the Surry simulator by Surry Power Station op'erators and Essex human factors specialists during the week of September 24, 1984. The activities involved in verification of component suitability efforts using the photomosaic w~re described in Section 4.2. The objectives of the walk-through/talk-throughs were twofold: first, to verify the completeness of the task analysis and, second, to review the human engineering suitability of the control room design. During the walk-through, all tasks analyzed were observed and reviewed in terms of human engineering suitability. Over the course of one week, one shift supervisor, two control room operators, one shift technical advisor, two human factors specialists and one simulator instructor walked and talked through each of the operator-allocated and
-analyzed tasks at the Surry simulator. At_ the end of each task or group of related tasks,
- the participating operators were asked the following questions pertinent to task perform-ance:
o o Does the CR design adequately support task performance? Does equipment layout adequately support task performance? o Does equipment design adequately support task performance? o Do you know of any errors which have occurred during performance of this (these) tasks? In cases where* suitability issues were identified, the issues were discussed and subsequently documented in the form of HEDs. 4.2.2 Verification of Task Performance Capabilities Criteria The criteria applied to this process, ~dentified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.1.la and b, 6.1.3.ld and e, 6.3.4.3a and b, 6.5.1.la through f, 6.5.1.2a through f, 6.5.1.5d through f, 6.9.12c, 6.9.3.2a through d. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 4-2
- 208
- 4.2.3 Task Analysis/Verification Findings The findings of the Task Analysis/Verification effort are presented in Table 4-2 "Verification of Task Performance Capabilities." Overall, 34 criteria were applied to the verification process. Of these, 2 {6%) were not applicable, 5 (15%) were in compliance, and 27 (79%) were not in compliance. A total of 154 HEDs were generated which document all of the 27 criteria that were not met. Table 4-2 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section 5.0 for an explanation of assessment category). Note that the category "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED .
209
TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILmES Page 1 of 6
- 6.1.1.l ACCESSIBILITY OF INSTRUMENTATION/EQUIPMENT
&UIDELINE I 0'/$~' ///
i 1
~ ..
I
,I #
~
I
- a. PRESENT IN THE CONTROL ROOM - 0 NO 22A05001 1-1 Control room instrumentation and equip- 20A02035 II-6 ment should include all controls and displays 20A02050 II-6 needed for (1) detection of abnormal condi- 20A02051 II-6 tions, and (2) bringing the plant to a safe 20A03061 IIl-8 shutdown condition. 20A03062 III-7 22A01703 CPT
' 20A03063 III-9 21A01702 CPT 22A02053 CPT 21A01701 CPT 22A03065 CPT 22A02054 CPT 22A03066 CPT 22A05002 1-2 21A05009 CPT 20A02005 II-6 23001105 II-6 20A02043 I-5 20A02044 1-4 20A02045 1-1 20A02046 1-2 20A02049 1-3
- b. ARRANGED TO FACILITATE 0 NO 20001203 IIl-8 COVERAGE - Opera tors should not have 22A00403 CPT leeway to leave the primary operating area (see Exhibit 6.1-1) to attend control room instrumentation on back panels during oper-ational sequences in which continuous moni-toring or the timing of control actions may be criticaL 6.1.3.1 UNIT INTEGRATION AND INTERFER-ENCE 0 NO 20A04203 III-9
- d. SHARING OF PROCEDURES - Each unit 23000402. IIl-8 should have its own set of procedures and other reference documents as required to make sure that references are easily availa-ble to personnel in each unit, and to avoid conflicting needs for the same reference.
- e. SHARING OF EQUIPMENT -
(1) Control of plant equipment from one 0 NO 22A01009 CPT control room should not affect the 20A01007 CPT ability of operators of other control 22A01000 CPT rooms to maintain control of their 22A01008 CPT respective units . 210
TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILmES Page 2 of 6
- 6.1.3.le (Cont'd)
GUIDELINE 1///,1/1/ ~
~
~
I (2) The status of plant equipment under 0 NO 20A01007 CPT the control of one control room should be displayed in all cQntrol rooms caps.- ble of controlling that equipment. (3) If control of plant equipment from one NIA N/A Dual Unit CR control room renders that equipment unavailable to other control rooms, availability status indications should be displayed in all control rooms. (4) A single, ce.ntrally located control 0 YES panel/console may be used for dual-unit control rooms within the same isolation boundary when this design does not conflict with the panel layout and control-display integration guide-lines of Sections 6.8 and 6.9 (5) Administrative procedures should be in 0 NO 20A01007 CPT place which assign responsibility for 22A04002 Il-6 allocation of use of controls of shared plant equipment to single control room. 6.3.4.3 ANNUNCIATOR RESPONSE PROCE-DURES
- a. AVAILABILITY - Annunciator response 0 YES procedures should be available in the control room.
- b. INDEXING - Annunciator response proce- 0 YES dures should be indexed by panel identifica-tion and annunciator tile coordinates.
6.5.1.1 INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED
- a. TASK ANALYSIS - Analysis of operator 0 YES Conducted as part tasks in relation to system engineering and of CRDR system functional objectives is recom-mended as the surest means of establishing opera tor information requirements .
211
TABLE4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES Page 3 of 6 lll/,1/ll ,. IIU1DEL1f11E
- b. COMPLETENF.SS OF INFORMATION - 0 NO 22A02027 II-6 Visual displays provided in the control room 23001208 1-5 should give operators all the information 23003018 1-5 about system status and parameter values 20A02035 II-6 that is needed to meet task requirements in 20A02050 Il-6 normal, abnormal, and emergency situa- 20A02051 Il-6 tions. 20A02052 11-6 23A02413 1-2 20A02005 11-6 20002237 III-8 '
23001105 Il-6 20A02043 1-5 20A02044 1-4 20A02045 1-1 20A02046 1-2 20A02049 I-3 20002238 IIl-8 20002239 III-8 20002240 IIl-8
- c. UNNEC~ARY INFORMATION - Effi- 0 NO 20001103 IIl-9 cient performance requires not only display 20A01148 II-6 of all needed information but also avoiding 23003018 1-5 the display of extraneous information in the 23A02055 CPT
- d.
prime operating area. REDUNDANCY - Redundancy in the pre-sentation of information items should be limited to cases where needed for backup or to avoid excessive operator movement. 0 NO 22A01213 III-9 20001103 Ill-9 22A02028 CPT
- e. DEMAND INFORMATION VERSUS STATUS 0 NO 20A02035 Il-6 INFORMATION - Demand information 20A02050 Il-6 shows that equipment has been commanded 20A02051 Il-6 (by control settings or otherwise) to a par- 20A02005 Il-6 ticular state or leveL It shows only what is 20A02043 I-5 demanded - not what is actually being 20A02044 1-4 realized. Status information shows the 20A02045 1-1 state or level actually in effect. 20A02046 1-2 20A02049 1-3 (1) To prevent operator confusion, it is 0 NO 20001104 11-5 essential that displays be identified as 20001106 11-6 to whether they reflect demand or 20001107 1-2 actual status. 22A02029 Il-5 (2) Visual display of actual 0 NO 22A03041 11-5 system/equipment status should be 22A03101 Il-6 displayed for all important*
parameters. 20A03061 IIl-8 20A03062 Ill-7 20A03063 IIl-9 212
TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIF..S Page 4 of 6 I ~~/ la I I I
- 6.5.1.1 (Cont'd)
IIUIDELIIIE
~
I I
$/ I
~
I
~
- f. DISPLAY FAIL URE - 'When panel instru- 0 NO 22A02030 CPT ments, such as meters, fail or become 22A02056 CPT inoperative, the failure should be apparent 22A02057 CPT to the operator (e.g., through off-scale indi- 22A02058 II-:6 cation). 20A02203 CPT 6.5.1.2 USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALOES
- a. SCALE SELECTION - Scale units should be 0 NO 21A02412 1-2 consistent with the degree of precision and 22A02076 CPT accuracy needed by the operator. 22A02032 II-7 20A02037 CPT 20002018 Il-5
. 20002019 22A02060 Ill-9 Il-6 22A02074 Il-5 22A02075 Il-2 22A02070 1-2 22A02071 CPT 22A02068 CPT
- 22A02069 CPT 22A02066 (::PT 22A02067 Ill-7 22A02072 Il-5 22A02073 Il-6 22A02062 Ill-9.
22A02063 CPT 22A02064 1-2 22A02065 1-5 22A02031 Ill-8 22A02061 CPT 20A02231 III-8 20A02235 Ill-8 22A02059 1-3 20A02230 Il-5 20002006 CPT 20002007 III-9 20002008 CPT
- b. ELIMINATION OF OPERATOR 0 NO 22A02077 CPT CONVERSION - All displays should indi-cate values in a form immediately usable by the operator without requiring mental con-version.
- c. PERCENTAGE INDICATION - Percentage 0 NO 20002007 Il-7 indication may be used when the parameter 20002000 11-7 is meaningfully reflected by percentage. 20002018 Il-5 20002019 III-9 22A02033 CPT 213
TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES Page s*of 6 y;~; ; ~I I
- -~ is ~
&UIDELINE I $I I ~
6.5.1.2 (Cont'd)
- d. SCALE RANGE - Scales should be selected 0 NO 20A02233 Il-6 to:
I (1) Span the expected range ot 0 NO 20AD2232 CPT operational parameters, or 20A02236 Il-6 22A02079 Il-7 20A02241 Il-6 20002006 CPT 22A02078 lli-7 (2) Employ appropriate scale ranging techniques, or (3) Be supported by auxiliary wide-range 0 NO 22AD2034 CPT instruments. 22A02081 CPT 22A02080 Il-7 22A02082 1-2
- e. SCALE SIZE - Scale ranges may be 0 NO 20002010 Il-6 expanded (or contracted) by multiplying or 20002021 Il-7 dividing indicated scale values by powers of ten. All such scales should be clearly marked as to whether the indicated values should be multiplied or divided, and the factor involved (e.g., 10, 100, 1000).
- f. SENSITIVITY - Display dynamic sensitivity 0 NO 20002009 1-5 should be selected to minimize the display 20002020 IlI-9 of normal random variations in equipment 22AD0111 CPT performance. 22A05006 I-6 6.5.1.5 SCALE MARKING
- d. SCALE COMPATIBILITY - When two or 0 NO 20002011 Il-6 more displays of the same parameter (e.g., 20002237 IlI-8 pressure, temperature) must be compared, 20002038 III-8 scales should be compatible in numerical 20002039 IlI-8 progression and scale organization. (See 20002040 Ill-8 Exhibit 6. 5-6).
- e. LINEAR VS LOGARITHMIC SCALES - 0 NO 20002012 Il-6 Logarithmic scales should be avoided unless needed to display a range of values.
- f. MULTISCALE INDICATORS - Multiscale 0 YES indicators (i.e., single pointer, multiple scales) should be avoided unless they can be justified as of operational benefit, and pre-cautions are taken to avoid operator con-fusion .
214
TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES Page 6 of 6
- IIUIDELINE 6.9.1.2 MULTIPLE CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS I V/!$/ i/1 I
§
;, ~
I
~
~
*c. (4) Displays should read off-scale, not N/ I\ N/A zero, when not selected, especially if zero is a possible parameter displayed (see Exhibit 6.9-2).
6.9.3.2 CONTROL-DISPLAY RATIO
- a. CONTROLS - Controls should provide a 0 NO 20A03030 D-7 capability to affect the parameter con- 20003015 1-5 trolled easily, with the required level of 20A03055 lll-9 precision. They should be effective in 20A03056 Il-5 sufficient time, under expected dynamic. 20A03057 D-7 conditions, and within the limits of manual dexterity, coordination, and reaction time.
- b. DISPLAYS - Displays should provide a 0 NO 20003015 1-5 capability to distinguish significant levels-of the system parameter controlled. I
- c. EXCESS PRECISION - Both displays and 0 NO 20A03055 DI-9 controls should have a precision which does 20A03056 D-5 not greatly exceed that required. 20A03057 D-7 20A03030 D-7
- d. FE_EDBACK - Feedback from the display 0 NO 20A03042 1-2
- should be apparent for any deliberate movementofacontroL 215
- 4.3 Validation of Control Room Functions Whereas the control room surveys evaluated control room equipment largely on a component basis, the objective of the validation process was to examirie the organization of the components and the extent to which they function as an integrated whole to support control room operations.
The .method employed for the validation process was a real-time simulation of selected scenarios at the Surry simulator that challenged all of the critical safety functions. A step-by-step walk-through took place immediately after each real-time simulation. The scenarios are described in Appendix C. This method facilitated observation of any conditions or features of the control room which hamper or impede the successful performance of a task. The validation walk-throughs were manned by Surry Power Station operating
- personnel. They included a shift supervisor, two control room operators, a shift technical advisor and a simulator instructor. Before the walk-throughs were conducted, a briefing was given which included an explanation of the purpose of the walk-throughs and examples of potential human factors problems.
The observer team consisted of two human factors specialists. During the validation
- process, a walk-through validation form was used, _with HF observers concentrating on appropriateness of control room layout, component location, and workload (see Figures 4-3A, 4-3B). In addition, questions were asked concerning workload, excessive task complexity, and time constraints in task performance.. In all cases where issues were identified, the issue was discussed in detail and subsequently documented in the form of HEDs.
( 4.3.1 Validation of Control Room Functions Criteria The criteria applied to this validation, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.1.2a and b, 6.1.3.la through c, 6.1.3.2a and b, 6.4.2.2f(2), 6.4.3.la, 6.8.1.la through c, 6.8.1.2, 6.8.1.3a and b, 6.8.2.la through c, 6.8.2.2b, 6.8.2.3a and b, 6.8.2.4a and b, 6.8.3.2a through c, 6.8.3.3, 6.9.1.la through c, 6.9.1.2a through c, 6.9.2.la and b, 6.9.2.2a through e, 6.9.2.3a and b, 6.9.3.la through c. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 4-3
- 216
- 1.
VALIDATION OF CR FUNCTIONS Familiarize operators with objective and method - emphasize that this is an evaluation of the control room: CR layout, control panel layout and operator workload. We are not evaluating the EOPs.
- 2. Select the appropriate procedure from the attached list, and instruct the operators to conduct the procedure exactly as they would during an actual event, particularly with regard to allocation of function/responsibility.
- 3. Confer with the simulator instructor to set up the simulator to challenge the appropriate safety functions.
- 4. Fill out the upper portion of the data sheet: Event-name of transient being simulated (e.g., SGTR, ATWS following loss of off-site power); Malfunction No-number of simulated event; Functions-safety functions being challenged (e.g., RCS inventory, containment integrity); ERG #-number of EOP used (e.g., E-2, ECA-O.O).
- 5. Observe operators walking through event in real time. Record any problems with CR layout, Panel layout, Workload on the data sheet. NOTE: Do not be constrained by these categories, record any HF problem you observe.
- 6. When the real time walk-through is completed, have the operators walk-through the event again, one step at a time. Observe each operator decision-action sequence, ensuring that the necessary controls and displays are available, appropriately designed and appropriately located. Record any discrepancies.
- 7. Query the operators concerning the following CR characteristics:
- a. Location of controls/displays.
- b. Design of controls/displays.
- c. Completeness of information/control capability.
- d. Workload.
- e. Communications.
- f. CR layout.
- g. Any other comments concerning the event.
Recor~ all operator comments on the data sheet.
- 8. Repeat steps 2 through 8 for the next event.
FIGURE 4-3A INSTRUCTIONS FOR VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS 217
VEPCO VALIDATION Page_of_ _ PLANT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ EVENT_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ MALFUNCTION NO(S) - - - - - - - - - - - FUNCTION(S) ERG#_ _ __ OBSERVATIONS CR LAYOUT HED# COMPONENT LOCATION HED# WORK LOAD HED# COMMENTS:
- FIGURE 4-3B VALIDATION OF CR FUNCTIONS DATA FORM 218
- 4.3.2 Validation of Control Room Functions Findings The findings of the validation of control room functions process are presented in Table 4-3 "Validation of Control Room Functions." Overall, 73 criteria were applied to validation of control room function process. Of these, 11 (15%) were not applicable, 35 (48%) were in compliance, and 27 (37%) were not in compliance. A total of 92 HEDs were generated which document all of the 27 criteria that were not met. Table 4-3 also includes the category assigned to each HED during the assessment meetings (see Section 5.0 for an explanation of assessment category). Note that the category "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED
- 219
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 1 of 12
- liUIDELINE 6.1.1.2 CONSISTENCY OF MANNING _WITH EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
- a. COVERAGE - Control room manning and 0, NO 23000402 III-8 task assignments should ensure complete 20004201 CPT and timely coverage of controls, -.displays, and other equipment required during all modes of operation.
- b. UTllJZATION OF ADDmONAL 0 YES PERSONNEL - Additional on-site or off-site personnel may augment the normal crew complement under certain conditions (e.g., refueling). If *so, activities and task assignments should be planned to ensure proper coordination. (Note: special training for this situation may be required.)
6.1.3.1 UNIT INTEGRATION AND INTERFER-ENCE
- a. EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT - Equip- 0 YES ment should be arranged with movement and communication patterns in mind, so that unit operations do not interfere with each other.
- b. SENIOR OPERATOR STATION - Senior 0 NO 20001402 CPT operators who supervise and assist opera-tions of more than one unit need to be sta-tioned so that they can communicate effectively with operators in each unit and have an unobstructed visual path to the control boards of each unit.
- c. SHARING OF PERSONNEL - \\"here opera- 0 NO 20A04203 Ill-9 tors may assist those of another unit, poten-tial task loading should be evaluated to assure that each unit can be covered ade-quately in all situations.
6.1.3.2 UNIT MIRROR IMAGING If a mirror image design has been used: N/A N/A
- a. DEDICATED CREWS - Operational crews should be committed to one or the other unit. They should not be allowed to alter- N/A NIA nate between the two mirrored units. This includes operators manning a single center desk station .
220
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 2 of 12 I 0&/ $/ ~/
- 6.1.3.1 (Cont'd)
IIUIDELINE I l ' I E
~
~
I
- b. ACCENTUATE DIFFERENCES - The N/A N/A distinction between the mirrored units should be heightened as much as possible so that there will be no confusion e)Sout where one unit ends and the other begins. This can be done by using a different color scheme for the elements of each unit, including carpeting, desks, and other work station equipment, as well as the board surface areas.
6.4.2.2 CODING OF CONTROLS f(2) When color coding is used to relate a control 0 YES Background to its corresponding display, the same color shading by system should be used for both the control and the display. 6.4.3.1 PUSHBUTION DESIGN PRINCIPLES
- a. POSITION - Pushbuttons in a row or matrix 0 YES Background should be positioned in a logical order, or in shading by system an order related to the procedural sequence.
6.8.1.1 ASSIGNING PANEL CONTENTS Controls and displays should be placed within the control room at locations which promote efficient procedures, safe operation, and maximum opera-tor awareness of the current system condition. There are three general methods for achieving this condition. They are: (a) grouping by task sequence, (b) grouping by system function, and (c) grouping by importance and frequency of use.
- a. GROUPING BY TASK SEQUENCE - Con- 0 NO 23001206 11-7 tro),s and displays should be assigned to work 23001223 11-5 stations so as to minimize operator move- 23001224 Ill-7 ment. To the extent practical, this assign- 23001225 11-5 ment should consider both normal and emer-gency procedures. It should be practical to perform all frequently occurring routine tasks with a minimum of human movement from panel to panel 221
i TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 3 of 12 i' GI ~II I ,, I
- 6.8.1.1 (Cont'd)
. &UIDELINE
,I ~~! ~
- b. GROUPING BY SYSTEM FUNCTION - 0 NO 20A02119 11-6 Within the c*onstraints of grouping by task 20A02048 11-5 sequence, controls and displays should be 20001205 11-7 assigned to panels in functional groups 20001220 11-5 related to system structure. This grouping 20001221 III-7 should promote easy understanding of the 20001222 11-5 relationship between controls and system, 23001206 III-9 and should assist graphic or pictorial display 23001223 11-6 or system relationships. 23001224 Il-6 23001225 III-9
- c. GROUPING BY IMPORTANCE AND NIA N/A FREQUENCY OF USE - Within the constraints of grouping by task sequence and by system function, controls and displays should be assigned to panels depending on
- their importance and frequency of use.
Controls or displays which are neither important to plant safety not frequently used should be installed in secondary panel locations. I 6.8.1.2 EFFECTNE PANEL LAYOUT The location of controls and displays within a 0 YES single panel should make the effective use of the viewing and manual manipulative areas. The allocation of panel positions should first ensure the integrity of arrangement or grouping by system function and task sequence. Within those . constraints, consideration should be given to the following factors: (a) the frequency with which controls and displays are used; (b) the significance of controls and displays in terms of their possible use during an emergency; (c) the importance of controls and displays to overall system performance; and ( d) special requirements in using a control device or display instruments, such as the need for accuracy, speed, application of force, or a particular type of movement. 6.8.1.3 ENHANCING RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION
- a. SPACING - Spacing consists of physically 0 YES separating groups of components on a panel with enough space between groups so that the boundaries of each group are obvious.
Spacing between groups should be at least the width of a typical control or display in .. the group (see Exhibit 6.8-1). 222
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL.ROOM _FUNCTIONS Page 4 or 12
- 6.8.1.3 (Cont'd)
&UIDELINE /1/IIG1!1! ~
R
- b. DEMARCATION - Demarcation consists or 0 YES Also use color circumscribing functional or selected groups shading.
of controls and displays with a contrasting line. The application of demarcation tech-. niques should conform to Guideline 6.6.6.2 (See also Exhibit 6.8-1).) 6.8.2.1 SEQUENCE, FREQUENCY OF USE, AND FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
- a. SEQUENCE - Con"trols and displays which 0 NO 23A01005 1-5 are used together during a normal task sequence should be grouped together.
(1) Displays which are observed in a 0 NO 20A03004 1-2 specified sequence, as during hot-leg 20J13020 ll-7 temperature check for all reactor 20V13021 lll-9 coolant loops, should be grouped 20V13022 1-2 together. It is desirable that they be 20A03023 1-3
- positioned so that they are normally 20A03025 11-7 used in a left-to-right, top-to-bottom, 20A03024 1-5 or other natural sequence. 20A03026 ll-7 20V22407 ll-6 20V23027 CPT 20V23028 CPT 20B23029 11-5 20A03031 11-6 20A03058 CPT (2) Controls which are operated in 0 NO 20A01215 11-6 sequence, as in energizing a system or 23003019 II-6 aligning fl series of valves for a particular function, should be grouped together. It is desirable that they be ,
positioned so that they are normally used in a left-to-right, top-to-bottom, or other natural sequence. (3) When there is a set of related controls 0 YES and displays, the layout of displays should be symmetrical with the controls they represent. 223
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 5 of 12 I Y// I $/ /// , / ; I ~ G $ IIUIOELINE ! 4:' 6.8.2.la. (Cont'd)
- b. FREQUENCY OF USE - Frequently .used 0 NO 20A03004 1-2 controls and displays should be arranged to 20J13020 Il-7 reduce search time and minimize the 20V13021 Ill-9 potential for error during use. 20V13022 1-2 20A03023 1-3 20A03025 Ill-8 20A03024 1-5 22F23026 11-7 20V22407 Il-6 20V23027 CPT 20V23028 CPT 20823029 11-5 20A03031 Il-6 20A03058 CPT (1) They should be near the center of the preferred visual and manual areas.
(2) They should be positioned so as to be easily identified.
- c. FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS - 0 NO 20A03004 1-2
- Functionally related controls and displays should be grouped together when they are:
20J13020 20V13021 20V13022 20A03023 20A03025 20A03024 22F23026 Il-7 Ill-9 1-2 1-3 Ill-8 1-5 Il-7 20V22407 Il-6 20V23027 CPT
.. 20V23028 CPT 20823029 Il-5 20A03031 Il-6 20A03058 CPT (1) Used together to perform tasks related to a specific function (e.g.,
operation of the residual heat removal system). (2) Identical in purpose (e.g., reactor coolant pumps). 6.8.2.2 LOGICAL ARRANGEMENT AND 0 NO 20A03209 11-6 LAYOUT
- b. OTHER EXPECTATIONS - Where other operator expectations can be identified, components should be arranged to match these expectations. 0 NO 22A03034 I-2 224
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 6 ort2 I 0~! ~/ f, If . ~
~ ~ $ ~ G llUIDELINE I $/ I _,I 6.8.2.3 LAYOUT CONSISTENCY The location and arrangement of recurring functional groups and of individual components of those groups should be similar from panel to panel or within a panel.
- a. REPEATED FUNCTIONS - The layout of 0 NO 20003017 1-2 identical control or display sets should be consistent at all locations.
- b. MIRROR-IMAGING - Layouts of repeated 0 NO 22A03215 II-7 functions should not be mirror-imaged.
6.8.2.4 STANDARDIZATION When a precedent has been established in the arrangement and location of controls and displays, that standard practice should be followed unless other crucial considerations necessitate a change.
- a. PANEL TO PANEL STANDARDIZATION - 0 NO 20A02103 II-5 Standardization should be maintained where 20A01311 II-6
- similar functions or panels are located at 20A01312 II-7 several work stations or units are located at 20A01313 II-6 several work stations or units and must be 20A01314 Ill-9 used by the same personnel. 20A01315 ll-7 20A01316 11-6
- b. SIMULATOR-TO-CONTROL ROOM 0 NO 23A01002 Il-6 STANDARDIZATION - Standardization should be maintained where simulators or procedure trainers are used that simulate the actual operational equipment.
6.8.3.2 STRINGS OR CLUSTERS OF SIMILAR COMPONENTS On occasion it may be necessary to have a large group of similar components arranged together in strings, matrices, or other clusters. Those human factors principles presented in Section 6.8.2, Layout Arrangement Factors, should not be compromised where large clusters of components are concerned. However, considerations such as search time, discriminability of components, and avoidance of selection errors will often make a string or matrix the preferred arrangement. The following criteria should apply:
- a. ORIENTATION - Horizontal rows of 0 NO 20A02040 CPT displays should be used rather than vertical columns (see Exhibit 6.8-4) 225
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 7 or 12 6.8.3.2 (Cont1d) liUIDELIIIIE 1/l/~1!1/ 4
~
~
- b. STRING LENGTH - Strings of small 0 NO 20A02041 CPT displays should not exceed about 20 inches on the control board. I
./
- c. NUMBER OF COMPONENTS 0 NO 20A02041 CPT (1) No more than 5 similar components should be laid out in an unbroken row or column.
(2) If more than 5 similar components must be laid out together, the string or cluster should be broken up by tech-niques such as physical spacing or demarcation (see Exhibit 6.8-5). 6.8.3.3 MIRROR IMAGING Mirror-imaging is an arrangement in which two 0 NO 20A02042 Il-7 functional groups are laid out symmetrically so that one is a complete, or almost complete, reversal of the other. Mirror-imaging should not be used, and any recurring functional groups should be replicated. 6.9.1.1 SINGLE CONTROL AND DISPLAY PAIRS Controls and displays which are normally used together should be located in close proximity to each other, but positioned and separated sufficiently so that the display is not obstructed during operation.
- a. PROXIMITY - A visual display that will be 0 YES monitored during control manipulation should be located sufficiently close that an operator can read it clearly and without parallax from a normal opera ting posture.
- b. OBSCURATION - Controls and displays 0 YES should be located so that displays are not obscured during control operation (see Exhibit 6.9-1) .
226
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 8 of 12.
~~11 ,~ ;:,; I
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __:G::;Ul::,:DE:::Ll:;:,;NE:___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
6.9.1.1 (Cont'd)
;.I~ -~ I$
-f---*;...+---+--~___;;...._+--""-1:...----"'"----1
- c. ASSOCIATION - Related controls and 0 YES Color shading displays should be easily identified as being associated. This association can be established (or enhanced) by (1) location, (2) labeling, (3) coding, (4) demarcation, and (5) consistency with operator expectations.
The following relationships should be immediately apparent to the operator: (1) Association of displays with controls. (2) The direction -0f movement of control and display. (3) The rate and limits of movement of the control and display. 6.9.1.2 MULTIPLE CONTROLS OR DISPLAYS The control and monitoring of nuclear power plant systems will occasionally require either multiple controls or multiple displays. Control display relationships in multiple arrays should be apparent to the operator and consistent with human expectations.
- a. MULTIPLE CONTROLS, SINGLE DISPLAY -
(1) Controls should be mounted below the NIA NIA display. (2) Controls should be centered on the NIA NIA display. (3) Controls should be grouped in a line or NIA NIA matrix. (4) If not feasible to mount controls NIA NIA directly below the display, controls should be mounted to the right of the display. (5) Where there is a normal order of use, NIA 'NIA controls should be arranged for use in left-to-right, top-to-bottom, or other natural sequence . 227
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 9 of 12 G
- 6.9.1.2 (Cont'd)
(6) IIUIDELINE Where the above techniques cannot 0 YES I Color shading apply, or where tor other reasons the relationships are not readily apparent, layout enhancement techniques should be employed - spacing, demarcation, color shading, insert panels, panel relief, and the use of mimics*. See Guideline 6.8.t.3.
- b. SINGLE CONTROL, MULTIPLE DJSPLAYS-(1) Displays should be located above the 0 YES control (2) The control should be placed as near 0 YES as possible to the display, and prefer-ably underneath the center of the display array.
(3) Displays should be arranged 0 YES horizontally or in a matrix .
- (4) . If it is not feasible to mount displays (5) above the control, they should be mounted.to the left of the control Where there is a normal order of use, displays should read from left-to-right, top-to-bottom, or in other 0
0 YES* YES natural sequence. (6) Where the above techniques cannot 0 YES apply, or where for other reasons the\! control-display relationship is not clearly apparent, layout enhancement techniques should be employed. See Guideline 6.8.1.3. (7) Displays should not be obscured during 0 YES control manipulation.
- c. DISPLAY SELECTORS - Where displays are selected for viewing using a rotary selector switch, the following should apply:
(1) The control should move clockwise 0 YES from OFF (if appropriate) through set-tings 1, 2, 3... n. 228
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 10 of 12
- IUIDELINE /
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __;;.,;..;;.;;.~~-------+--+---+-----t---r-------; I
~
'!. I ~I I
f.
~
;b I 6.9.2.1 (Cont'd)
(2) The control room position sequence 0 NO 22A01219 ll-7 should conform to the display - sequence. (3) Control position indications should 0 YES correspond with display labels. . 6.9.2.1 LOCATION AND ARRANGEMENT OF CONTR01rDISPLA Y GROUPS
- a. FUNCTIONAL INTEGRITY - Multiple 0 YES controls or displays related to the same function (e.g., power, status, test) should be grouped together.
- b. SEQUENCE OF USE - Sequence of use should be as follows:
(1) Left to right. (2) Top to bottom .
- (3) The above combined (normal reading order).
6.9.2.2 SINGLE PANEL ARRANGEMENTS Appropriate arrangements for control-display relationship, in order of preference, are 0 YES (a) display above each control, (b) displays and controls in matched rows, and (c) multi-row displays with a single row of controls. Practice should be consistent, so that operator expectations are not confused.
- a. DISPLAY ABOVE EACH CONTROL - The preferred configuration is as shown by Exhibit 6.9-3, with the display above each control. If this configuration is used the following should apply:
(1) Each display should be located directly 0 YES above its associated control (2) The display /control pairs should be 0 YES arranged in rows
- 229
TABLE4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 11 o! 12 1///,1/1/
- 6.9.2.2 (Cont'd)
IIUIDEi.lNE b.* CONTROIS AND DISPLAYS IN ROWS - As an alternative, displays may be arrayed in rows as the upper portion of a panel, matched to controls arrayed in similar rows below, as shown in Exhibit 6.9-4. (1) Each control should occur the same 0 NO 23001207 Il-5 relative position as the display to 23A03210 Il-6 which it is associated. 23A03211 Il-7 23A03212 11-7 (2) Controls and displays should have 0 YES corresponding labels.
- c. MULTI-ROW DISPLAYS WITH SINGLE- N/A N/A ROW CONTROIS - A less desired arrangement is that of Exhibit 6.9-5, in which two or more rows of displays are arrayed above a single row of controls.
(1) Displays should be ordered left to right and top to bottom (in normal reading order), and matched to controls ordered left to right. (2) Controls and displays should have 0 YES corresponding labels.
- d. CONSISTENT PRACTICE -. Arrangements 0 NO 23001207 Il-5 of functionally similar controls and displays should conform to the same convention throughout the control room.
- e. CONTROL/DISPLAY PACKAGES - When N/A N/A controls and related displays are assembled using modular packaged units, the design of the packages will limit the location and arrangement which can be achieved. In this case, modules should be selected and arranged to achieve maximum conformity with the principles described above.
6.9.2.3 CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS IN SEPARATE PLANF.S
- a. SEP ARA TE CONTROIS AND DISPLAYS - 0 YES Where displays are on separated panels, they should preferably be on the adjacent upper panel from their associated controls. See Exhibit 6.9-6 .
- 230
TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 12 of 12
~!
- 6.9.2.3 (Cont'd)
IIUIDELiNE I lr//1~
$~#
~ I I _,~
~
- b. FACING PANELS - In no case should 0 YES related controls and displays be located on separate panels that face each other.
6.9.3.1 GENERAL MOVEMENT RELATIONSHIPS
- a. ROTARY CONTROLS - Rotary controls 0 NO 23A03218 Il-6 should turn clockwise to cause an increase in parameter value. The associated display movements should be as follows:
(1) Linear scales, up or to the right. 0 YES (2) Digital displays, increasing in value. 0 YES (3) Strings of indicator lights, bottom-to- 0 YES top or left-to-right. (4) Circular meter pointers, clockwise. 0 NO 23A03218 Il-6
- b. LINEAR CONTRO~ - Linear controls should move up or to the right to cause an increase in parameter value. The associated display relationships should be:
(1) Linear scales, up or to the right. 0 YES (2) Digital scales, increasing in value. 0 YES (3) Strings of indicator lights, bottom-to- 0 YES top, or left-to-right.
- c. DISPLAY RESPONSE TIME LAG - 0 NO 22A03216 ll-6 22A03217 1-5 (1) There should be no time lag between system condition change and display indication.
(2) When there is a time lag between 0 NO 22A03206 1-1 control actuation and ultimate system 22A03216 ll-6 state, there should be an immediate 22A03217 1-5 feedback indication of the process and direction of parameter change . 231
- 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF HEDs NUREG-0700 defines a Human Engineering Discrepancy, or HED, as "a departure from some benchmark of system design suitability for the roles and capabilities of the human operator." Section 6 of NUREG-0700 contains these design benchmarks or guidelines. While it can be expe9ted that the CRDR process will produce reports of Human Engineering Discrepancies, it does not follow that all discrepancies will neces-sarily degrade operator performance to the point that plant operation would be affected.
The objective of the assessment process was for the HED Assessment Team (HEDAT) to evaluate the relative significance of the HEDs produced during the review phase. During assessment, those HEDs that are unlikely to degrade performance were separated from those that may degrade performance. 5.1 Introduction to Assessment The first step in the assessment process was to determine if a* Preliminary HED represented any departure from guidelines. If so, the assessment team considered
- potential for inducing error, consequences of induced error, and safety importance of the HED. Then, during the disposition process, the assessment team selected the means by which the HED will be corrected, or it provided a justification for any discrepancy not fully corrected.
All HEDs, including Preliminary HEDs, were reviewed by a committee consisting of, as a minimum, one senior human factors specialist, one nuclear systems engineer, one l&C engineer, two operations specialists (one from Surry Power Station, one from North Anna Power Station) and one operations specialist with experienc~ in the human factors aspects of plant operations. The assessment methodology described below differs frorri that described in the Program Plan. The decision process itself, in terms of the issues addressed (i.e., potential for error, consequences of error, and safety importance), is the same. However, the methodology does represent an improvement in approach. While the methodology used was still more qualitative than quantitative, it was less subjective than the approach described in the Program Plan. In the approach used, three simple yes/no responses, followed by two ratings on numerical* scales,* were required. To further reduce the subjectivity of the process, criteria lists were provided for the numerical ratings . 232
- 5.2 The Assessment Process The assessment process entailed the following activit.ies (see Figure 5-1, HED Priority Record):
- Determine if each Preliminary HED is, in fact, an HED.
- If so, determine if the error has been documented (No/Yes).
- If documented, determine if unsafe condition or tech. spec. violation resulted (No/Yes).
- If not documented, assess potential for error on a six-point scale.
- Assess if HED is of high safety importance (No/Yes).
- Assess the consequences of error occurrence on a six-point scale.
- Based on the above, assign an HED category/priority (from 1-1 to III-9).
The HED Priority Record (Figure 5-1) contains a section for assessment and a logic
- diagram. The diagram shows how the assessment data were integrated to assign categories and priorities to HEDs.
5.2.1 Determine if a PHED is an HED
- As defined above, an HED is a departure from the human factors guidance contained in NUREG-0700 or from other appropriate benchmarks of human factors design. As a first step in the assessment process, a: determination was made as* to whether or not a Preliminary HED did, in fact, represent such a departure. If, in the considered judgment of the assessment team, a Preliminary* HED was determined to represent an _actual deviation, the remaining steps in the assessment process were carried out. If not, the reason for ending consideration of the PHED was recorded, and the PHED was retained in the data files. Reasons that nondiscrepant items were occasionally documented as PHEDs include:
- Misinterpretation of interview/questionnaire items by operators
- Plant issues that are out of the scope of the CRDR (if appropriate, these were referred to other Virginia Electric and Power Company entities)
- Misinterpretation of operator responses by interviewers
- Incomplete.or ambiguous interview/questionnaire responses
- Misunderstanding by HF reviewers of the ways components or systems function
- Issues that have been corrected during the period between data collection and assessment.
-233
HED PRIORITY RECORD HED #
- 1. DOCUMENTED ERROR?
- 2. DOCUMENTED UNSAFE CONDITION OR TECH.
SPEC. VIOLATION?. NO NO YES YES
- 3. HIGH SAFETY IMPORTANCE NO YES
- 4. ERROR POTENTIAL? 1 2 3 4 5 _6_
LOW HIGH
- 5. CONSEQUENCE OF ERROR: 1 2 3 4 5 _6_
LOW HIGH HED YES NO CATEGORY I YES DOCUMENTED UNSAFE CONDITON OR TECH SPEC VIOLATION CATEGORY II CATEGORY Ill NO NO 0
- FIGURE 5-1 HED PRIORITY RECORD 234
Before ending consideration of the PHED, efforts were made to ensure that the assessment team understood the issue involved. For example, this might have entailed checking an ambiguous interview response. If any disagreement between assessment team members could not be resolved at this step or on any of the following steps, the disagreement was noted on the HED record. 5.2.2 Determine if Documented Error Given that no control system can be designed to be operationally error-free, one purpose of the assessment process was to estimate Human Engineering Discrepancy impact on hypothetical (unknown) baseline error rates of control room components; i.e., will additional errors be induced by discrepancies from the guidelines? Estimates of Human Engip.eering Discrepancy
- impact on error occurrence were determined quali-tatively. If the HED had previously resulted in a documented error, the potential for error was considered to be absolute. For an HED to be considered as having resulted in a documented error, the error had to be recorded on an LER, Shutdown and Trip Report, Station Deviation Report, Engineering Work Request, or on other plant documents such as operations log sheets. If a document error had occurred, then. "Documented Error?" was
- circled "YES" on the HED Priority Record
- 5.2.3 Determine if Unsafe Conditions or Tech. Spec. Violation If the HED had resulted in a documented error as described above, a determination was made as to whether or not the error involved an unsafe condition or a violation of technical specifications. The document review and the expertise of the operations and enginering members of the assessment team were relied upon for this determination. If the error had resulted in an unsafe condition, or if a violation of technical specifications had occurred, the appropriate YES" was circled on the HED Priority Record.
5.2.4 Assess Potential for Error If no documented error related to the HED had occurred, then as shown on the HED Priority Record, an assessment of error potential was generated on a six-point scale based on the interact.ion of the discrepancy with the criteria given in Table 5-1, "Potential for Error Assessment Criteria." A rating of 11 111 indicates that a low probability of induced errors is expected as a result of the Human Engineering Discrepancy, and 11 611 indicates a high probability of additional errors being induced
- 235
- TABLE 5-1 CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF ERROR POTENTIAL The following criteria were considered in assigning the Error Potential. rating:
- 1. The nature of discrepancy, including the following factors:
(a) The impact of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to perceive and discriminate input information. Considerations include: Whether required information is provided. The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to locate, read, and interpret displays of interest. The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to see and hear. * (b) The impact of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to process information. Considerations include: The likelihood of exceeding the operator's information processing capability. The likelihood of causing confusion or distraction. Operator fatigue or discomfort which may be caused by the discrepancy. Additional processing steps or processing errors which
- may be introduced by the discrepancy.
(c) The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to perform required actions. Considerations include: Whether required controls are provided. The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to locate the control. The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to use the control.
- 2. Conditions of stress which may exist when associated tasks are performed.
- 3. The past occurrence of errors as a result of the discrepancy.
- 4. The degree and prevalence of the deviation.
- 5. The familiarity of the components and systems involved.
- 6. The frequency with which the associated components and systems are used.
- J 236
- 5~2.5 Assess Safety Importance For all HEDs a determination was made as to whether or not the HED was of high safety importance. This was based upon the collective judgment of the HEDAT members as to whether or not the affected component or components were part of a safety-related*
system. Important considerations included in this determination
- were whether the component was qualified as REG 1.97 equipment, if the component was classified as lE, or if the component is necessary for r~covery from an accident.
- If the HED was determined to be of high safety importance, the appropriate "YES" was circled on the HED Priority Record.
5.2.6 Assess Consequences of Error Occurrence The effect of the hypothesized error on plant operations was assessed on a six-point scale as shown on the HED Priority Record. The criteria for assessment of error consequence are shown in Table 5-2. 5.3 HED Category/Priority The logic diagram on the HED Priority Record shows how assessment determinations
- were integrated to assign a category and priority for each HED
- Category (I, II, or III) was assigned by determining if the HED involved a documented error or .by rating the potential for error. That is, Category I Human Engineering Discrepancies are those which have been noted from documented operational errors or problems reported by operators. All Category I Human Engineering Discrepancies are
. deemed to increase error potential, but consequences must still be assigned to determine ultimate significance. Category II Human Engineering Discrepancies are those discrepan-cies noted during CR surveys, task analysis, and/or operator interviews, which have been determined to be of valid concern and may warrant corrective action, but for which. no documented cases of operator error were found during the Review of Operating Experience, but which have an error potential greater than "3. 11 Category III Human Engineering Discrepancies are those discrepancies noted by CR surveys and/or operator performance interviews which have been determined to have little impact on operator performance, and for which no documented cases of operator error were found during the Review of Operating Experience
- 237
- TABLE 5-2 CONSEQUENCE OF ERROR ASSESSMENT CRITERIA The following criteria will be considered in assigning the Consequence of Error rating:
- 1. The risk of injury to the ,,public.
- 2. The risk of injury to plant personnel.
- 3. The potential effort of the error upon operating margins to safety limits.
- 4. The importance of the components and systems involved.
- 5. The availability of alternate systems and components.
- 6. The ability of automatic protective features to compensate for the error.
- 7. The ability of the operator to detect the error.
- 8. The ability of the operator to recover from the error.
- 9.
10 . The potential for the error causing additional errors. The risk of equipment damage. 238
Once an HED had been categorized, its priority (1 - 9) was assigned by determining, as described above: o If the HED had resulted in an unsafe condition or tech. spec. violation o If the HED was of high safety importance o The seriousness of the consequences of error occurrence. As shown on the HED Priority Record, priority varied from a value of 1 (most serious) to 9 (least serious). A category and a priority was assigned for each HED. The assessment status of an HED, therefore, varied from I-1 (most likely to degrade plant safety and operations) to III-9 (unrelated to plant safety and least likely to affect plant operations) .
- 239
APPENDIX A OPERATOR QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORMS A-1
A-1 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR VEPCQ CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW
221
- VEPCO CRDR QUESTIONNAIRE Instructions
- 1. The following are questions concerning the operations within the control room.
Most of the questions will require a YES or NO answer, with some additional information.
- 2. When you have comments or suggestions, use the space provided below each question. If you need additional room, use the backs of the sheets.
- 3. If you do not understand a question, please contact any of the following people at Essex Corporation at (703) 548-4500:
- o Cliff Baker o Danna Beith
- o o
o David Eike Tom Talley Harold Van Cott.
- 4. Please answer all of the questions as completely as possible citing as many examples as you wish.
- 5. If any question does not apply to your control room, please mark it as N/ A.
- 6. All of your answers and your biographical information will be kept in the strictest confidence and will be used only to aid in the performance of the detailed control room design review. No one at VEPCO will see your answers.
- 7. When you finish the questionnaire, please put it in the envelope provided and mail it to Essex Corporation .
221
- BIOGRAPHICAL DAT A:
Name: VEPCO CRDR QUESTIONNAIRE Age:------ Sex: Height: Weight:------ Current Position/Title:
- 1. Do you have a current reactor operator's license? YES NO
- 2. Amount of licensed experience at th.is plant: - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 3. Total amount licensed experience:
- 4. Related experience and amount (example: operator-trainee, Hodge NPP Unit 1, 1 yr.):
- 5. Education:
- a. Highest level attained:
- b. Specialized Schools or courses (list):
- 6. Military experience:
221 QUESTIONNAIRE
- 1. Have you experienced any problems performing a task or job due to inadequate staffing? YES NO If yes, please explain.
/
- 2. Have you experienced any problems performing a task or job due to a requirement to perform several tasks concurrently or simultaneously? YES NO If yes, please expiain.
- 3. Have you experienced any problems performing a function due to the lack of controls available to you at the control board? YES NO
- If yes, please explaiil:.
- 4. Are there any pr_actices or procedures relating to plant maintenance that interfere with control room operations? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 5. Are there any areas in the operator training that you feel are not adequately covered? YES NO If yes, please explain .
221
- 6. Is there anything related to your operator training that your would like to see changed? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 7. Are there any tasks that you are required to perform that are not adequately covered in the procedures? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 8.
- Have you ever experienced any problems accessing/retrieving procedures/reference materials? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 9. Are there any areas in the control room that are*uncomfortable because of temperature or humidity? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 10. Have you ever experienced any difficulties communicating between any two points in the control room? YES NO If yes, please explain .
221
- 11. Have you ever experienced any difficulties performing a function due to communication problems?
If yes, please explain. YES NO
- 12. Are any auditory signals too loud that they interfere with speech? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 13. Are there areas in the control room where illumination is not sufficient or is too bright? YES NO If yes, please explain .
- 14. Have you experienced any problems assessing the status/availability of equipment shared between units? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 15. Have you experienced any problems with the rotation of or sharing of control room personnel between Units 1 and 2? YES NO If yes, please explain .
221
- 16 . Have you experienced any problems in viewing control and display panels (including annunciator panels) from desks and consoles placed
.in the primary operating area?
If yes, please explain. YES NO
- 17. Have you experienced any problems reading any displays located on the control panels? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 18. Have you experienced any problems operating any controls located on the control panels? YES NO If yes, please explain .
- 19, Have you ever accidentally activated a control, or do you know of any controls that have been accidentally activated? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 20. Did you ever make an error in performing a function because of problems with the existing design of controls and displays? YES NO If yes, please explain .
221
- 21. Are any controls, displays, or other equipment items inappropriately
.labeled or not clearly labeled to describe the primary function?
If yes, please explain. YES NO
- 22. Do any labels contain wording or abbreviations that are not commonly used/accepted by the operators? YES NO If yes, please give examples.
- 23. Are there any annunciator alarms that occur so frequently that you consider them a nuisance? YES NO If yes, please give examples .
- 24. Have you ever experienced any problems with the computer system? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 25. Have you ever experienced problems with reading characters or identifying graphic symbols on the control room CRTs? YES NO If yes, please explain .
221 26 . Are there any other areas in the control room design or layout that you have had problems with? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 27. Is there anything you would like to see changed in the control room? YES NO If yes, please explain .
i A-2 INTERVIEW FOR VEPCO CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW
221 VEPCO
- BIOGRAPHICAL DAT A:
APPENDIX B2
*oPERATOR INTERVIEWS Name: Age:
Sex: Height: Weight: - - - - - - Current Position/Title:
- 1. Do you have a current reactor operator's license? YES NO
- 2.
- Amount of licensed experience at this plant:
- 3. Total amount licensed experience:
- 4. Related experience and amount (example: operator-trainee, Hodge NPP Unit 1, 1 yr.):
- 5. Education:
- a. Highest level attained:
- b. Specialized Schools or courses (list):
- 6. Military experience:
- B2-2
221 TP-9.8 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE 1 May 1983 APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE
- 1. Are all the instrumentation and equipment necessary for you to detect abnormal plant conditions present in the control room? YES NO If no, please explain.
- 2.
- Are all the instrumentation and equipment necessary for you to bring the plant to a safe shutdown condition present in the control room? YES NO If no, please explain.
- 3. Are there any operational sequences in which you are required to leave the primary operating area to attend to instrumentation on other panels when continuous monitoring or control actions may be critical?
- YES NO
- If yes, please explain.
- 4. Are you aware of any cases in which control of shared plant equip-ment from one control room will interfere with the operators' ability to control the shared equipment from the other control room? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 5. Is the status of all shared plant equipment, including availability status, displayed in both control rooms? YES NO If no, please explain *
- B2-3
221 TP-9.8 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE 1 May 1983 APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE
- 6. Are there administrative procedures available that assign responsi-bility for allocation of use of controls for shared equipment in a single control room? YES NO If yes, what is the procedure name and number?
- 7. * (I & C) Were operator tasks analyzed to determine operator infor-mation requirements prior to selection of control room display? YES NO If yes, is a copy of the task analysis available?
- 8. Do the visual displays in the control room provide all the information that you need to meet task requirements for normal, abnormal, and
- emergency operations?
If no, please explain. YES NO
- 9. Are there any visual displays in the control room that are unncessary or should be replaced by more important displays? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 10. Are there any redundant displays that are not needed for backup or to avoid excessive operator movement? YES NO If yes, please explain .
- B2-4
221 TP-9.8 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE l May 1983
- 11.
APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE Are all displays that present equipment status clearly labelled to indicate whether the display is of actual or demand status? YES NO If no, please explain.
- 12. Are there any displays that indicate demand status that you believe should indicate actual status? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 13. ~s there always a positive indication that an instrument, such as a meter, has failed or become inoperative? YES NO If no, please explain .
- 14. Are there any displays that have scales that do not provide the pre-cision or accuracy you require when using them? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 15. Are there any displays that require you to perform some form of conversion in order for you to effectively use the information (e.g.,
converting percent level to gallons in a storage tank)? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 16. Are there any displays that indicate percentage instead of level or flow as some other value that would be more useful to you? YES NO If yes, please explain .
- B2-5
221 TP-9.8 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE 1 May 1983 APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE
- 17. Are all display scales adequate in terms of the range they span, or are they at least supported by auxiliary wide-range instruments? YES NO If no, please explain.
- 18. Are there any displays that are difficult to use because they display normal random variations in equipment performance? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 19. Are there any displays for which information is required to use the display (e.g., multiply display value by 100) but the information is not located on or adjacent to the display? YES NO
- If yes, please explain.
- 20. When you have to compare two or more displays of the same parameter (e.g., pressure, level) are the scales always compatible in terms of numerical progression and scale design? YES NO If no, please explain.
- 21. Are there any unnecessary logarithmic scales in the control room? YES NO If yes, please explain .
- B2-6
221 TP-9.8 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX 82 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE
- 22. Are there any unnecessary multiscale indicators (i.e, single pointer, multiple* scales) in the control room? YES NO If yes, please explain. j
- 23. For selectable displays (e.g., multiple channel displays), nonselected displays read off-scale, not zero. YES NO If no, please explain.
- 24. Do all controls provide the precision necessary for you to easily and effectively control the affected parameter? YES NO
- 25.
If no, please explain. Do displays of controlled parameters allow you to distinguish signifi-cant levels (changes) in the parameter being controlled. YES NO If no, please explain. 26~ Are there any controls or displays that are either overly precise or not precise enough for the tasks you have to perform? YES NO If yes, please explain.
- 27. Is adequate feedback concerning control movement available through control room displays. YES NO
- If no, please explain .
82-7
221 TP-1.1 WORKSPACE 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Have you experienced any problems in viewing control and display panels (including annunciator panels) from desks and consoles placed in the primary operating area? YES NO 2.(3) Are you able to perform task actions in a convenient position at any work station? YES NO 3.(6) Is the access and movement of nonessential but authorized personnel limited to prescribed areas within the control room? YES NO 4.(7) Are provisions made for easy access to procedure manuals and other reference mat~rials while task sequences are peformed at consoles? YES NO
, 5.(10) Are you able to work comfortably at desks, with proper surface height and area, and adequate knee room and chair height? YES NO
- B2-8
221 TP-1.1 WORKSPACE 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(12) Are there suitable, out-of-the-way but secure places for storage of the personal belongings of control room personnel, with adequate space? YES NO 7 .(13) Do you consider the control room environment generally comfortable in terms of color and lighting? YES NO 8.(16) Does the carpeting or other floor covering in the control room lessen the fatigue of standing and walking? YES NO 9.(17) Do control room personnel have unlimited access to a restroom and kitchen that are dedicated to their use? YES NO 10.(18) Do these facilities have communication links to the control room, if they are out of voice contact range? YES NO
- B2-9
221 TP-1.2 ANTHOPOMETRICS 1 May 1983 APPENDIX 82 OPERATOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Have you ever had any problems operating a control because it was too high? YES NO If yes, please explain: 2.(2) Have you ever had any problems operating a control because it was too low? YES NO If yes, please explain:
- 3.(3) Are there any controls that are located in such a way that it makes operating the control awkward (i.e., resting hand on panel, leaning on rail, etc.)? YES NO If yes, please explain:
4.(4) Are there any controls that are inconveniently located? YES NO If yes, please give examples:
- 82-10
221 TP-1.2 ANTHOPOMETRICS 1 May 1983 APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 5.(5) Have you ever had any problems reading a display because it was too low? YES NO If yes, please give examples: 6.(6) Have you ever had any problems reading a display because it was too high? YES NO If yes, please give examples:
- B2-ll
221 TP-1.3 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) is all emergency equipment that is needed by control room personnel in the .control .room area? YES NO 2.(5) Are all operators well practiced in donning protective equipment? YES NO 3.(8) Is there protective clothing available that is compatible with your size? YES NO 4.(9) Is there breathing equipment available that is compatible with your size? YES NO 5.(12) Do you have any. problem performing your *general control room duties while wearing protective equipment? YES NO
- B2-12
221 TP-1.3 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(13) Do you have any problems communicating with others while wearing protective equipment, specifically breathing equipment? YES NO
/
7 .(18) Is all fire, radiation, and rescue equipment easily and readily accessible? YES NO 8.(25) Are provisions available to assure complete internal and external communications capabilities during emergencies? YES NO
- B2-13
221 TP-1.4 HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Are there any specific areas within the control room boundary that are not comfortable because of air flow or ventilation? YES NO 2.(2) Would you pref er room temperature to be warmer or cooler during winter and summer months? YES NO 3.(4) Are there noticeable fluctuations in control room climate conditions? YES NO 4.(5) Would you pref er a more constant room temperature? YES NO
- B2-14
221 TP-1.5 ILLUMINATION l May 1983
- 1.(3)
APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE Are there areas in the primary operating area where illumination is not sufficient for the task performed? YES NO 2.(4) Do shadows ever interfere with reading labels, instructions, and other written information? YES NO 3.(5) Does glare ever interfere with the readability of displays, labels, or YES NO indicators? 4.(6) Are colors used on panel surfaces, controls, and displays recognizable under both normal and emergency lighting conditions? YES NO
- B2-15
221 TP-1.6 AMBIENT NOISE l May 1983 APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Have you noticed any difficulty with verbal communications between any two points in the control room? YES NO 2.(2) Have you noticed any particular noise distractions originating inside the control room? YES NO 3.(3) Have you noticed any particular noise distractions originating outside the control room? YES NO 4.(4) Are there any particular time periods when noise levels are either too high or too low? YES NO 5.(5) Do you feel that general background noise is too high? YES NO
- B2-16
221 TP-1.7 MAINTAINABILITY 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX 82 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Do you have an adequate supply of expendable items such as ink, pens, printer paper, etc.? If NO, please list the expendables and the amounts you feel you need. YES NO ..
2.(2) Do you have an adequate supply of spare parts such as fuses, bulbs, etc.? If NO, please list the spare parts and amounts you feel you need
- YES NO
- 3.(3) Do you have all necessary and special replacement tools that are needed to install expendables and spare parts available in the control room? If NO, please list the tools you need. YES NO 4.(7) Is there ample storage space available in the control room for expendables, spare parts, and tools? YES NO 5.(8) When different types, sizes, or styles of expendables are required, are they clearly visible? YES NO
- 82-17
221 TP-1.7 MAINTAINABILITY 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERATOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(9) When different types, sizes, or styles of spare parts are required, are they clearly marked? YES NO 7 .(13) If bulbs are replaced in annunciator panels that require legend tiles to be removed, are the tiles marked to ensure that they will be replaced in the correct position? YES NO 8.(21) Can you replace indicator light bulbs easily, with the power on, and without danger to yourself or the equipment? YES NO
- B2-18
221 TP-2.1 CQMMLNICATIONS 15 Aug 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(3) Are there any conditions under which the conventional-powered tele-phone system is difficult to use because of noise or some other factor? YES NO
./
If yes, please explain: 2.(4) Are there any conditions under which the sound-powered telephone system is difficult to use because of noise or other factors? YES NO If yes, please explain:
- 3.(5) Are there any conditions under which the walkie-talkie system is difficult to use because of noise or other factors? YES NO If yes, please explain:
4.(6) Are there any conditions under which the fixed-base UHF system is difficult to use because of noise or other factors? YES NO If yes, please explain:
- B2-19
221 TP-2.1 COMM~ICATIONS 15 Aug 1983
- APPENDIX 82 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 5.(7)
- Have you ever had any problems transmitting or receiving messages over the PA system? YES NO If yes, please explain:
6.(8) Does the PA system ever interfere with reception of incoming alarms? YES NO If yes, please explain:
- 7 .(9) Are emergency backup communications equipment adequate for all
- anticipated operating modes? YES NO If no, please explain:
- 82-20
221 TP-3.1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM 1 May 1983
- 1.(17)
APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE Do any of the alarm horns startle or irritate you? YES NO 2.(28) Are all tiles dark on annunciator panels when no alarm is indicated? YES NO 3.(29) Can you easily tell if a tile is normally on for an extended duration during normal operating conditions? YES NO
- 4.(30) Are you immediately aware if an annunciator tile is out of service? YES NO 5.(32) Do you know of any alarms that occur so frequently that you consider them a nuisance? YES NO
- B2-21
221 TP-3.1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(33) Do you know of any alarms that do not give you ample time to respond to a warning condition? YES NO 7 .(34) When responding to an alarm tile, can you readily locate the controls and displays required for corrective or diagnostic action? YES NO 8.(38) If alarms are used that require information outside the control room, do they allow you ample time to respond? . YES NO
- B2-22
221 TP-4.1 CONTROLS 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Do you know of any controls that activate a critical function that do not have a movable cover or guard? YES NO 2.(3) Do you know of any areas on the board where controls are subject to accidental activation? YES NO 3.(5) Have you ever had difficulty activating a control because an adjacent control was in the way? YES NO 4.(6) Do you know of any controls that interlock unnecessarily? YES NO 5.(8) When a strict sequential activation is necessary, do you know of any controls which are not provided with some type of interlock? YES NO
- B2-23
221 TP-4.1 CONTROLS 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(10) Can you recall any controls that you are never required to use? YES NO 7 .(11) Are there any controls that are duplicated unnecessarily? YES NO 8.(13) Are there any controls that you would expect to be of a certain type or size, and they are not? YES NO
- 9.(24) Can you recall any knobs or handles of control switches that slip or are loose on their sha'fts? YES NO 10.(25) Are there any controls that move so easily that you can't tell when you've activated them? YES NO
- B2-24
221
- TP-4.1 CONTROLS
- 1 May 1983.
- 11.(30)
APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE Do you know of any small J-handles/pistol grips handles that should be larger because of the torque required to operate them? YES NO 12.(34) Are there any controls that are difficult to adjust to the precise level you need? YES NO 13.(35) Do you get immediate feedback that a pushbutton has been activat.ed? YES NO
- B2-25
221 TP-5.1 DISPLAYS 1 May 1983 APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(2) Is system/equipment status inferred by any indicator light being off instead of illuminated?
- YE? NO 2.(13) Do you know of any scale ranges which are too wide for the maximum displayed values (i.e., meter never indicates over half scale)? YES. NO 3.(14) Do you know of any scales where maximum values are too large for the scale (i.e., pointer reaches maximum, then stops) and supporting
- wide-range instruments are not provided? YES NO 4.(15) Do all meters fail off-scale? YES NO 5.(17) Do you know of any multiscale displays (i.e., single pointer, multiple
- scales) that should be single scale displays? YES NO
- B2-26
221 TP-5.1 DISPLAYS 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(18) Are any of the multiscale displays confusing to read? YES NO 7.(19) Are any displays difficult to read because of poor contrast between the pointer and the background? YES NO 8.(21) Are all recorders that you are required to use located within your primary work area? YES NO 9.(22) Do you know of any recorders that are used for a purpose other than to record trend information and material for later reference? YES NO 10.(25) Can you easily read all the data through the window of the recorder without opening it? YES NO
-** B2-27
221 TP-5.1 DISPLAYS 1 May 19~3
- 11.(26)
APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE Do you know of any graphic recorders in which the ink clogs the pens or smudges the paper? YES NO 12.(29) Do you know of any strip chart or impact recorders in which the pens or the printing heads are frequently driven to their maximum, then tend to mechanically or electrically hang up? YES NO 13.(30) Where multiple channel inputs are control- or switch-selectable for
- display on a strip chart recorder, do you know of any case where after input selection, there is an appreciable delay before the parameter is actually displayed? YES NO
- B2-28
221 TP-6.l LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS l May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPE.RA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(7) Are controls, displays, and other equipment items appropriately and clearly labeled to enable rapid and accurate location, identification, and manipulation (if applicable)? YES NO 2.(8) Are labels pertinent to control actuation visible during actuation? YES .NO 3.(10) Do labels describe the primary function of equipment items? YES NO 4.(11) Do the words employed in the label express exactly what action is intended, if action is necessary? YES NO 5.(12) Are instructions on labels clear and direct? YES NO
- B2-29
221 TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERATOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(13) Do words have a commonly accepted meaning for all users? YES NO 7 .(14) Are there any unusual technical terms used in labels? YES NO 8.(15) Are there any symbols (e.g., abstract symbols like %) which have uncommon meanings? YES NO
- 9.(18) Does the method used for "tagging-out" a control prevent actuation of the control? YES NO
- BZ-30
221 TP-7.1 COMPUTER SYSTEM 1 May 1983 APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Have you ever experienced any problems with the computer system such as accessing a file or locating information? YES NO If yes, please explain: / 2.(2) Have you ever experienced any problems with the computer system printers? YES NO If yes, please explain:
- 3.(3) Have you ever experienced problems with the computer system CRTs?
If yes, please explain: YES NO 4.(4) Have you ever experienced any problems with the computer system keyboards? YES NO If yes, please explain:
- B2-31
221 TP-7.1 COMPUTER SYSTEM 1 May 1983 APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 5.(6) Is the computer dialogue logical? YES NO If not, please explain: 6.(7) Is the computer dialogue vocabulary and syntax common to the operators who use the system? YES NO If not, please give examples:
- 7 .(8) Is the data presented on the CRT screen in a readily usable format?
If not, please explain: YES NO 8.(9) Are urgent messages requiring an immediate response highlighted to attract the operator's attention? YES NO If not, please give examples:
- B2-32
221 TP-7.1 COMPUTER SYSTEM 1 May 1983
- APPENDIX B2 OPERATOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 9.(11) Do general messages displayed on a CRT provide the information necessary to complete a specific action or decision sequence? YES NO If not, please explain:
10.(12) Are alarm messages readily distinguishable from other messages? YES NO If not, please give examples:
- 11.(13) Does the wording of alarm messages clearly relate to the specific annunciator tile that is illuminated?
If not, please explain: YES NO 12.(16) Are graphs and tables displayed on CRTs easy to read or interpret? YES NO If not, please give examples:
- B2-33
APPENDIX B SFRTA EXAMPLE: DETERMINATION OF ACTION AND INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS B-1
B-1 ACTION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS {AIRD) EXAMPLE
PLANT: _ _ S_u._'R_K~l/_ _ _ _ UNIT:_.._\_44---"~----"--- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: ~ \,.J \'-So 1'.) Sheet~\_ _ of
- I~
DATE:.~-'--f\j--'---'l~=----i/f-=8'-=5"~~~ 7 ( E? - 3. oo) ERG NAME: feu1-ED STEAM <!:,f.NQ.tP.]J)~ \~O\.A\10 N NO.: E - g. STEP NAME: e,e,\,fT]pf\l- AI u.A~ Dt-) s~ *' *
- NO.: I-CA1.AUQh! .:L TASK NAME: ...fl\AU.\:JIIIN s;w,. <>EtJ A,\/A\LA(',LE NO.:-----
TASK OBJECTIVE: ~ ~ . A \ , I D cCX)illOc.1)~.-*_ _ _ REMARKS: NATURE OF TASK: Contlnuoue _ _....\C..._ __ Discrete _ _ _ _ __ BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS 1 I
...,.s Verb Sp~~
Subsystem
/ ca._m /
Para-~,
/ *Direction
*~ / * * - / . DNtm Range Rate I I hhth/
l I C
~
i1
- t
~
~.
it! I it b c,,
~
I I
~
- Comment,
~i,,...\a..uv.. o.\ ~s\.
£1,l
;g* ,:c,,
rs,~
"~
".)
I l't\on ilov Re.;:,/ StM (£tJ s SiM &.EN~ ){°o<- '\ -<<-~.!> ~,ioi~\e.. 0 -1000 so i-1/'\ 'I (Jy,J. ~ C::ifw o.'JIM ~
\C'o<,M LtJ~ L D-100 -'% l. 0 tJIA N/t\
'I a_:, ~ l,.._ii~ S1,l\\c.
~ ~C..4'-\ ~.,j- I ftJMD\j._\ ~a.
RC.~ <..oo\ciovm. t(o'"- \..e." 4! L
*"l(o~ ~'N?,.5, ...
PLANT: --~S'""""'u~R'---'---'-'R-j,_____ _ _ UNIT: ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) I ~ J,, REVIEWER: CE W1LScH-.l Sheet DATE:__1/_,_Is-;::.,/'-'-~-'----s-( I= p - 3, DO) P,,oud-~'< d\ d-,rec\.- -,,:_ ERG NAME: i:AULftl) !.TJ;AM (;,.tJl:.ktfTOi!, l~OL.ATiy,J NO.: J; - ~ INITIATING CUES: ~ U,N~10-Jo.<-"->.o""J U,/o'l'...c ... +<c,\\f.\. l,L\ o_c STEP NAME: ~AwnoN-W:t CAllLJlD ,!',(;,J*"* NO.: 1-Q.\J\.IJQN.;)., -:rv- b8'l ~J* 1' \., k!Li ~ "~ *-~*.**')' .,\ TASK NAME: _MP.JM...ilil~l.:..t',l__ \.::Du\Tli':iN_ __ ___ NO.: _ _ _ __ TERMINATING CUES:~~u..v,11...1. ~ (!_',Je,,\,~ * <..ci.v V\\'\..... TASK OBJECTIVE: :m 1::tJ<",111<£ lWLAJYb ;5lY\t, oE:.N:,, flli.-JYl!\IN .l;;.,QV\~\L_ REMARKS: NATURE OF TASK: Continuous .-=c./ _ __ Discrete _ _ _ _ __ BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS
! 1 Verb System/
Subsy1tem
/ CompDMnl / Pa,am-
~..~ /**N*I Direction Range
/ UnllU Rate
!1/1k1b1hl Comment*
k~H ;g '3 I\"'-\ to..u. \~J ~ 6H I ~av,.i-hw ,::.c..sl mA '81~ st""' ~e.V\. ~I I'\ TSol<<-it!d ,..{/ \'\ t-!IY\ t-ll~ NI~ N/f\ N o< ~,e <.o<\cta.n-\
'r>~o..\<_ 6\.-o lAIA
~V'I\CUJ'V\ ; so\a\..cd d~ !.U\J~e\\J.tl\\-
tt'--o"~"I..\ o.c\iOv\~ u.V't\e ~~ ~\- ,s
-\.IL. O'I\ \ \.\ 91.A. bcN
~\JO..\ \a..'blQ.. for Rt~ (oo\~own, I
PLANT: _ _S...:,,c..:v::c_,_R"'"' "' --"--','1 1 - - - - - UNIT:
. J _\,.__~--'--"'-d-...~-
ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: CE. W \L ~o.J Sheet _-3 _ of
- DATE:._ _1+--/-'-'/S"'-'/L...>?
I I
-5:..___ __
(e P-3-oo)' Proc,J.HA"_J ~ c_,\. ~ - * \.v-0 \\ l ERG NAME: b\Al\!~ &eoll'O ~e¥ckv \UJ\-.!i0\ NO~: E - ~ INITIATING CUES:~ 691 ~.....CoHIQ~I "5 OJ.V"l(..0-... -!- :c1 STEP NAME:c\\u!.ll, 1111111'\ .sm.m1. uu, 1:,,ourno1o-1 4 f>'IPA~ I/A'-"~~**** NO.: 1, (1 ) '!£$f"M~_~\~ ~ TASK NAME: tt.i.::U.~ILMMtJ 6fft\1Y1,.lt,1E. lwi.Ann,*-d_6'tf~'l~'-~El> NO.: ~ TERMINATING CUES: o,a,"' ~~o-\,,...._ i"ol~= ~ lo'-\fc:a'-S. TASK OBJECTIVE::tt:1 1::s.oWID:..:me 'r,l!.EM, Ml> :ms SDY\ (,:,ib~~ f : : r u l r o _ ~ \)o.\'IU of o . ~ ~ 'Srtl\ (:,c;l\ls cic.S.a! REMARKS: t\os\"3 <>f>p\i"s ~ va.\\['('s ~ ~ NATURE OF TASK: Continuous Discrete - - - " " ' - - - - l\~~o. SIM C::>EN~- BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb Systeml Component Parameter Value/ Unll1I Comment, Subsy1tem Range Rate
\ o~~e.K\J(. l'l\.'i. Oo~c\ cJo~e_ ~r\ IJ/1\ .5"~ r.J '\ :l..
~I\
s~\,..-.c.. th. ;'"' °"' " t\ lwla\i~
~o..\11es (cf
~d<<\~
bEl'\s) v-lo\S*l )01~.e, c. j_ t.\~ Mdl" P~,-~ov- ~~d c.Jo!'e... 1-l}"A. N/A tJ/A 5sec. tl 3 ~ ~"'~\~ do~ f)~\iW'&..
\Jr'\ltS
\tb\a,~~
\J~\~e5 (,f A{t(..~~,S~
~N~)
11~1-\S* l \Ol!\ 1t 1c. 3 Ob.eKV"C N',i'f\ Q~~hCM t\~~~ cJ o.s.e.. \Jr i >.. N/l"t "1/A- s ,~~\,c..,\ 'k,i~
~\i.-J.. N 4 ~
\~\~~CM
\J,\~t'~ (.f 0..~c\e~ ST1\,\
(.~ws) I\ Ob'::.!W ll"C. Ma.," \i11a. {)Ds; \.; G'rs l\\)w 6~ (\'\po.~ \h\11e5 dose- "1.IA ~/A \lf~ ,o~ N I: s ( cf. '"c.W. stl.'-
'=,E.th
- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD)
PLANT: _ _C:=-----'u"'-~'->...!...:lR~:j~---- UNIT: _ _._\_4'-,;i_--'---
- REVIEWER: c;.E ll) \L5-bN DATE:
Sheet_ _ if- _*
\ I \lo I B 5" of /~
ERG NAME: ~.i.-.;;:..i......._ _.i,;.,,i,;=~=~'-"---=------=-=-.:_:_:;::..;..:: INITIATING CUES: ~1:.. Ge,,,. 't\.,s5 decw,.s*,.~ l.)..V\eoor<oil,,l,~. 01-STEP NAME: ..l..!l.!:.l<D....llldll.l.ll._..u.i;.QJ(!!.Jc.l!!t.,.~""'-'-'U!Jl,"-"-~="-=..u.s..~ s{-.., (oe,, f..-~~5 Co.., r'/,t,5 der a HLt rt~ea TASK NAME: _c_r_;_ C. " e,,'{11\M so\ ,o"1., TERMINATING CUES: lt\<M"' stea\M. 1sol1.>.tio... l- ':jf."-S.S vo.\ve.s TASK OBJECTIVE: Isal ...:k, J:\...c.. 'br!c:e. K of ,.,.ffut,d 51"1 Ge>>~) do...-J
- REMARKS:
NATURE OF TASK: Conthiuou8 _ _ _ _ __ Discrete ____,,v=------- BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS 1
.s
-.I Verb / Sploml Subsy1tem
/ Campononl / Po,omelo, h**~ /.*Wfi I Udl~ I ZhA~h/
Direction Range R1t1 l
.g
~
(I C
- t f;,
i1" ,.
,l
~! I :::
b 0-I:
~
.* Comment, J1Z1
'q' if
~
0-5 ~~ 'tv\5 ~f'I ~~~c. Po~;"°"' O.o~ uo~e. t-l/A. WA t-111'\ Jo c;ce N to 5" ~~\~ c..\o~
~,\IO-~ \lo..\.1e~ ' v-.\<< CS.
(J ~ c.\tA s~) b o~~uc. M-5 'N,.~n s~,,~ ?c5~~~ Ua~~ do~e.. 'N/A. N'f\ ll/A 10 'ia. N E, ~ \""'f\iu\ ~t-vi~
~w~~~
lo\ ~c1'>A~6)
;
I
PLANT: ------~-'-u~R.~8..--1{--------- UNIT:-~'-~-~~- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: c..£ ~,L ~o ~ Sheet DATE:.~..,_,1/~/-~+-/-KS-~~~~ 5"
- of \ /p
__) (Er- 3.oo~ -P,oucl..-oJI o,.,,,~.,...._ ERG NAME: E,,u.LTfl> ,:mt.ro ~"'ER~::IO'So ,w1...11.noN NO.: e- c!).. INITIATING CUES:~.ratl~ .).a.<.>.10..0; "'.I VoN\CAY.\-v:,\la~l .1 STEP NAME: C\\H)C, '" llN:1 . ::.h ,~ tUIT £(>,v\\.r'"I:!3) NO.: & ( ~ . Q:C.,ST!'#,~1 ~\c.~~~(>~d. TASK NAME: c \ \ ~ ~ . e . l ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - NO.: _ _ _ __ TERMINATING CUES: .:S1'lv' ¥"N.s. ~ c.k.ta. TASK OBJECTIVE: ::ig DEThl?.Mili6" 11?: AN'l sma 6EN \~ NOT EP,.UL-ret:) REMARKS:* NATURE OF TASK: Continuous _ _ _ _ __ Discrete--"'---- fl*, 6o \o lo.CA- Q. \ .J ~ .1.. BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb Systeml Component Parameter Value/ ' Unltal Comment* Subsyatem Range Rete
~e.';::./~ o&ls
- Sf'l\.\ 6~i'J~
(,u; \eo.~\ ~) Ptt.:::.cu'fe..
,~~,,
S\-u.'ok!/ 0- IOOO f SI~ 50 ll/f).. WA V E'. ~ ~~ ,l ~ Qlt-1,f":tJ Ii.I .1.-\o,'a ~ ~
~
i,('\CJUI~~* ~t(\f
~oc+..-~4e..-
'i\..-...._"\nt D'f" °':t'"c..
""1°v.<<\'\d. \,"e,.
"j O - \ODO 9 !> I <r \\ ~ ~ ~t..) r--.......,...,..
&'rt. A-eUIU.~\ ~
~ C.OV\ \'r o\\Q.1.-., h'I )
~ e::1...*
r~e..SS1A.f'~ ~~lo.._,
~ ....tu.. .,.*ho""" '?o;.,+-
PLANT: _ _c~-)~u~fs~Y-'--+------ UNIT: _\L.._1---"--"?,.:,,.___ ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: U v:-'l I L~C> ~ Sheet _h _ _ of
~,._ b' DATE:_-=1+/.i-:f<..~(f-=B::....:,S'------
JIp (£?-3-oo) - Pro.:ci~o.s> ~ ~<-'1 ~ ERG NAME: £ev.<-n;:t;> .'.;m:Am ¥r:Ult tflJ>C.. \;,oLA:D o rJ NO.: E -&_ INITIATING CUES:-V...V\(..DV'-\-.,o\\-ed m.\l:,l;tJ ~ .:l..ii~o.-.a. STEP NAME: \tll:.r,JT \(:'/ fAU.\. rep ~,,)(~,) NO.: -3 (,3} IU l.i.'l'i'-<-f~ ~ l d. ~1)1.\ bf:N TASK NAME: -~'M::C¥- 61NI, btN PP.e.~ NO.: _ _ _ __ TERMINATING CUES:~o.1-ia-... ~*-~Mo.cl... TASK OBJECTIVE: ::ro I::e;fEllM1tJ'E. IE I\N'f .s!]\/', ~!c::rJ 1s; PAULisJ) REMARKS:'61*.<,o -t. ~!.\.-. - ~ ~~ NATURE OF TASK: Continuous ______ Discrete _V:::::~--- PJ\a,AA.t.AAJ. ~ cl~* I~ ( ~ ~~ ~) BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb Systemt Component Parameter Valuet Unll1t Comments Subsystem Range Rate 50 }'J/F\ "'" * 'f £ l. d,. ~&t i\ ~ SO.,.~
~I.A.~ I.O
&i.<!.Nla~ i ,,
\Ml'\ (..CY\ \v-o l\O..t;) \ '-I .
?~s dcic..-e.* :.,.._'1' oe~tA... o ,e ...~....
~~<+-
. (Cl.. c1c. ,{ ~'\ ~nu.
0 - \oO ?~1~ 2.o 14/A. N/A Y el. I: i.. <..-...f" \el...,
~rel
'rc-~!I' .J.. I oo p~
PLANT: ------:=S;:_v.;::._,__B,i..:.Rj-=--4----- UNIT: _.,_\'-~l.:::L--- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: <!E \ ;>ij~ Sheet_ . 7
* .of
'o...o'.L -., \ /.,\) \
DATE:_.....:l+/ t,..<-4/-"S"-"S-'-----
......,.1 I Ip
( E ?- 3.00) ERG NO.: f:-~ STEP NO.: 3 C3) TASK NO.: _ _ __ TASK Q{ ,.kc.k Qf'!X' ':IC,\\l'eru REMARKS: t , u*--~' - u, ...... u.h NATURE OF TASK: Conthiuou$ _ _ _ _ __ Discrete-------"---- E 1.*. C:,io .\o '1tU,I<-
.~111'3.lN'"taA,v,...~--=--...-
s, 1e-u&." ( s~ s-) BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Vert, System/ Component Parameter Veluel Unite/ Comment, Subsy1t1m R1ng1 R1t1 st.f.... ~o.,..,.\~A O -/000 ?!II~ ffO N/f\ tJ/1\ N Ei a oraxekv ~~
~ '",~a.hi\~
'o~ol_
- De~re~~
of' sG"' hdow 5/f'f f.,,,,f Of fi'a..:,
- 5,.f,.,f.. s r~a 0-1000 r~*<r" s-o N/l't ~" rJ E. 3 ~ -SROA~
~ ~
'"'~~"'
~ Q\?~~- f\~ ~ P,~,~ a-zoo
~d p{~
~he.~
~ i
'J\~~D
_.__ _ _ ___.__ _ _...___ __,__ _ _..__..___J.__. __ *--* . ...
PLANT: _ _......::S,::___:::cu_,_R~~.c.....---- UNIT: _ _.___\~-~~- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: ~~ l&)\ L. So t-J Sheet_8......__ot/'2 DATE:.~-'-ll/__._/i-'-+/-=8_f"_ __ (EP-.3*a0 ERG NAME: £A\.J..LJD) Sre::Aoo 9f.N t.&&w,, bm. "'QC~ NO.: f; - .;;... STEP NAME: \M\..bIF fe,..u.~ '§.~!~) NO.: 1 ~ '4) TASK NAME: ,~OLb:Jia kAIALJ');"X) SrM <x-Ns. NO.:----- TASK OBJECTIVE: :10 ml\')(1V\'\,:1E s:..oou:::.o'"N d'.PM!,,L,=N .,.,Ni) fY\11:11001'\£ P,<;.,$, WQLDmu'-IJ AN\) MPl:t:> 3 f;N';A.b'i P , H l i : A : ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - REMARKS: NATURE OF TASK: Continuous______ Discrete - - - ' I L . - - - - BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb System/ Component Parameter Unite/ Comment* Subsyatem Rate I C..\o~ f'W F~w._k ().:b \ * .\-i"""' u"'~J C!Ao !IC.. N/A ,. ,~ ~" 2S'~ !'I d\ 1 ho\'~\.i °"'
\Jo.\"u (.~c."~
~ O'o~-,e... ~vJ ~,uA...,.-,....~ R,&*l\.i""' \,~~ cJo6.e.- N/~ tJ ""1- ..3
,~,a.~a-... \~\, v\ \J01 :~
- Wjt\ ll/f\ '2)
\Jo.\,,c5 (rc'1 s) 1 3 l\o~ f: w i:w ho\ ~OS~~c,v.. (iOCJ~ dose.. N/r.. H/ft N/A *5" "3 4 3
\Jo\<<s '5e..c.. ~c.b
~aAue s.
~ (ro~ ~w f-~ \!O\
\la.\\IC::, ?o::. *," !J\1\- l\()',.,<< J. do!.e.. ~/14. ~p., !-ll\'\ 4 S' se.c.
w f s ~ \ ; ~ \ ~;"' l 0 C\o~ Fw ~ \so\ \bsi\;~ 5 ofW'~ cl.wp-..~
\lo.,\IJ'e. s Clci~J UOS'(.. N/1\ N/1'\ ~/l't ~r\ ~ G, p.A-HS.O"t-.~ ~ h\oc.L dP...._ -Jo.\l.lES \oc.a\~'1 .
(. Ob~~
~"" ~o !>t,. N 'A ~A ,.J "
~J)\ N 1- \ 'i '-\ \.\JV/ I ~-,. ,~,1
- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD)
** Sheet
-*-J__ of J.__(o_ _
PLANT:*_ _ ....,,S""---=u_._S.:....iBL...l.j--+----- UNIT: ____.l._1--'---'--~-*__ REVIEWER: _C=---=w~,....::~=D~>-J ___ DATE:_ ___,_1+1-.,_\1.,~l-=B'-S"-._ __ (E ?- 3.00) ERG NAME: ~a.ult~6 st('A\/1\ Ge\'ll"r,~t-01.- I:,o\,.T,ovi.. NO.: E - .:)._ INITIATING CUES: st~ 6'eV\. '7t"eS5 decteh~*~ UY\Co,,fT"oll~t-1., STEP NAME: :r:: ~ohte.. :fo. . . \ tt>d SG(,:;) NO.: .l\ l4) <!.oV'l*l-;,,, .. t'J. or 'i>t'" GL..,_ en..,,'\'\ef,.'J de f'"'!,Su..-11r.J -' TASK NAME: Iso\1>-\<- Fa. ... \t.. d. 5G~) NO.:----- TERMINATING CUES: °'Fll.w.lted SG(S) 1sa(a.teJ. TASK OBJECTIVE: M.a..x1n1n.e. C.Oo!dowvi. V!'f1'.b*,L*f.1 * ,.. .. J tv\n,1\'W\.-ze. Res ~!down 'b.vtd M..r.t55 c,f 1:nfY'~"r ~elose.-. REMARKS: NATURE OF TASK: Continuous DiscYete v' BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb Systeml Component Perameter Value/ Unltal Comment* Subsystem Range Rale
- J- c.\o5e.. ~',::IN f,.f'N Pos,\.; °"' (\o.se~ e,lo:!>e.. \414' \1(1\ tllA J.5 !loec..
N 8 if
\so\a\i°"'
\J~\"~
q ,~\iu\.\J~,-~ " Ob;e,, \Te. /\~"" ~~""
\~\"'-~""
~\~QY\ t\o~d c..,\05,.~ NIA ~ tJIA ~s~
N \3
\Jo..\~
q C.\t)~ {)os.,'T'\ON o~J do.s~ N\w..~ dou... I
/\fiW
,'"~"',~""O'I\ ,.qA
~" NII\ Z*
5<<. rJ 10 II
\1~'1'ts
"'~'"'-
\() ~ \ J : . . Mw ~"'1 C.\ou~ cJo~e.. Q,~\'T\O t-l N 13 \\ \~\,u\- ~v,~
\so\~°"" "" 1-llA \lll\ .:2.S"sct..
\Jc,..\'I(.
,, C~o.u. Af'.W t\{.."'1 P°'5,~ 1IV\ (l~tl CL!o.se.. "11 Vil ~II\ ' ttll\ !"II\ tJ \;J.. o~~~~ IWL/t.T\orJ ~(Mv,:.& \o d0\.1-
\J/a.L\IE' Cl' ~oi .n\"e~ \ol.c)\~.
,i. 0Pf:ier\JC. f\f-'N \~L ~t>J.IJ E '-'~c.. N. v\ ' tJ \'., \ ~~..:,\ ~VI~~ \-o c,, 1I
ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet /0
*of I le PLANT:_._ ____,,,~""->U=-.,.,R,~_._,R..____;'-f-/-
)
___ UNIT: _L{.~ REVIEWER: C.~ l,J.)IC..SOA..) * - DATE: 1/J,'4,/85"_____
. (f p-3.00)
ERG NAME: (AViL:IU> Sl%Aro e;,.Q.Jµ:t~TP'?, 1:,0'-Auo,.J NO.: E- & . INITIATING CUES: so\-"" 6e11 f.-cess J. . c.,ol.S1~j. 1-l.,.~,,t,.1 10 b_S STEP NAME: l:,c, ArE'"~ M.H-.;n;D ~~ NO.: -4 (4) Ct,.,f;,,.,,.J m- SfM6e... <:..o-v1~+,1_y def,~!>!,u,,.l'J.. TASK NAME:....+/-s~\"'l-i: 0..\.(.lt*-tc[ sefc~ NO.: TERMINATING CUES: rl..~1-hJ 5GC$) Isol.._t~ TASK OBJECTIVE: M.z:t..'J<.\IM\l,..~ (;oQ\dow"'- Vip"-b, l1fv ~\'ld M1"'1ro 12.~ 5<c..5 Coo1cl~nJY1cL Mi:..~s of (ner,:_:f relel:!-.se. REMARKS: NATURE OF TASK: Contlnuou~ Discrete _..&L_ __ BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb System/ Component Parameter Value/ Unll1/ Comment, Subsystem Range Rat* 113 C.LD5 MS /HS Sil:MJI. Sl.).~P L~ Pen:, 1Tl o ~ CLOSE[) c__\.:,~e,_ N/1\ ~/A )'Ill\ 1',se<:- N 14- 15"
'\JIU-Vt=~ t0
~f:,\Nlc
\)e.,vel'l l\~w Purnt>
i IL\ oe,s~'1' M~/HS .sro\ I'(\ ~Wt.'J p~ ,-nor,) (.LOS 61:)
<lo!.~
VN,.\Je;. "Tb t-111\ ~I~ tl11' zs-s~ t-1. ,q 15 \""f\; ~ \ \J VI J, TUR.~1~£ 0R\'1'6'N
~IN Pv..Mf
\0 C)...OSE;
\v\5 /HS ~Tef\m Poi rnorJ l.Laset:> u*s~c.
C..,k>!.e,.. 1'{1~ ~J~ )',!J~ JG, 17 Man\Ao\\'\ (\~
~P~L.'i
'(,tr\.\le.'. '10 "'
TU..,P..~\ Nt: DR\1/'E"'N I\Pw ~fi\P
PLANT:*_ _ _,5"""---u"-'-B-'-'R~,f'------ UNIT: _ _,_I~:(=-/},_,___ ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: C. \.JJ\L~O ,j Sheet DATE:_1 l~j_8_5'_ __
/ / *of ---'-/~'2.,___
J (E~-2,oo) . ERG NAME: f ~u. l ted Sieo. W\. ~ e.,-1 e{"" t-~ I"sol11toV1.NO.: ~-~ INITIATING CUES: $"t"" ~e,,_ ?n:.~s dec.-e.:r, s*,,,6 u" co.-t..-011.1, '1 STEP NAME: _J:: Solz..fi. f4-u \fpJ SG C;,) NO.: - ~ -_ __S::_':U_(,'.o .. t,,.,~,,J. O'f ~t- 0e" Ccw1.plct~~ aep,-e.s , ...m"d.
- TASK NAME: __;; 1 "'.>o \1ite. 'E'ei 1.1,[fed. S~C;,) NO.: . TERMINATING CUES: fl:'<. .... l t-eJ SG"c;) :r:s_.,1,,_t.-d TASK OBJECTIVE: N\q.x1M1]!'.e. c..ool cb.uY! L,uft\.b1 \. t,, 2> l'.'cl N\.,..,, Wl\7.e-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____,.__R""'c.'-"<;,,__~..cl_d ow,..,~ p.V-Q. ~~S5 "6f__ E.\M_~_r_d~~c.- REMARKS: NATURE OF TASK: Continuous______ D i s c r e t e ~ BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb Systeml Component Parameter Value/ Unllal Comments Subsystem Range f11te J,, 0&5tJ].,_\l{; sm~ .sw,n-, pos1no..-l CJ...o.sE'l> uo.!,e.. Njl'\ },,!\~ 1..5" N 19 \""i\i u\ ~v,- ; ~ M:s/Hs
\JA\.Yi; ~ ,-0 ""' Sa.
l'\}J(61 N 6 DR.\"EN i'I~ 'l'l ~\},.('(\ ~
'. I I
C)....05~ l"\5/V\5 ~M
'&U.PPL'I PDQnO~ CJ OSEJ> Llo.s~ "11-A )-(JA. NIA. r</'A. N 18 Dpuok .~l"'-'\JLo 1/AL\Ja "'O ~~~ ~ ; ,u:Rt?.1we:: \oc.b\\l.\ cl~ IN I' DA.\\l'EN j .,..FvJ Pu.m P 'a\~ \,o..\\le.S
- i l,'3 o~Q:P.\JE MS/HS Pm 1T'IDJ ~et) Llo .!:IQ.
I ~.:,u.r?~'I 1'!/v\ VM.}Je; tl>
*\UY'lf:>I ~
tJIY\ 1'1114. ~IV\ tJ I'\
'--f ~\ \Jt'.N:~
~g_\ \Jb--.J
!' ' ~F-vJ ~~p
- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD)
- Sheet _
_j_.L_ of / ~ PLANT:*- ---=Sc_*_,_J~-'-'-R._,+I_ _ _ __ UNIT: _.,_I--"-.:f...::..J._ _ REVIEWER: CJ:. ~ IL~() 10 _ DATE: 1/ 1'ej 8 S" 7 (E: p- 3. oO) ERG NAME: _:f....L....C..l:l"'-'1_,__h'-"J=---:=-..,...==-'-~-"---' NO.: e: - c::qyc.o,,+,:,,weJINITIATING CUES:
~
Q:.. StM Gev1 r,.s~ dH,c."'"'"'~ Uh(',,,,f,..,1[,,b~ STEP NAME: _""".,-c-:...eS~o~\a~t~c,___i...==..!...l"'--""c.._::'-==""-'------- NO.: or s't.... Ge ... CoM'i'l<!"t*ly de\>re!.SL&.rl"Z<'ci, T ASK NAME: ~=o\~,,~te.'==-~~=,___~~~---~- NO.: . TERMINATING CUES: F1:1..L(.lfed :::,G(:.) T.solzite.J - T ASK OBJECTIVE: _r::!.~~'~'~'---~'l!!.!!~L....!,=-i~~-.Ul-,.....Q-=_.i:.=~~-- B, c. s Cco\dou.M, REMARKS: NATURE OF TASK: Continuous BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb System/ Component Parameter Statel Value/ Unltal Comment, Subsystem Direction Range Rate Ill O~ve.. k~/5f1t1 ~ti .Pol<\J s. fo51no1'-l CLC>St~ % ~~ l(/'A lO e.Lo=::.(: f.2.0..5 j SfM Gen.. fbR\]:::. fbsrno~ l~ 0 b/o t{/(\ ~A. S"s zl ~1/e 'C.C-5 / Sim ~rt ttlR\ls ~\\"lu~ ~ 0 % Nlf\ ~,~ 5 ~&(. "1 ~ID ;;).d.
\--f\,c.\- '!(.H ;~
z-i. ~5 ~~/st..-,Gu. f>li.<..ic; Pos,-no N D~ 0 o/o t</1\ \ll~ 5 sec. t-l ,;i.3 M~~\\ ~ c.\o~ z3 Qll.£.a_\.I I; f..-0;. /sf,., G}r1 . ~-k fbu\T\()~ c.i..c.sEl) 0 lo ttll\ t,1JI\ 5 ~ ~lo ~L-\ l~\, ...;-\- ~Q,*n~ 1~ ~ fJ..C.S/sf,:,1 G'ttt Pi>R~s Pu_, ,-no f\J 0 ro ){IA ijj(\ Nit\ N ',AS ~o..tN ~.)(,. \J'1..,
,u.Jf~ ~ <.\o~
o-{ 'o\ ex}_ IP\ 'ffiS .)S o~<.\/e- Gl'VI l<.C5,../5fm l-0~'.I 5 fh. me,._) beD C
% \!\I\ \111\.
oc.a\\l N/'A ts) J. J. ~ \~\,t.i\ ~~v;h_l
PLANT:*_---'S-.,._"""1.A..._..R..,_(3.~j1---- UNIT: I ~ )-.. ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: C£" WILSO.J DATE:__jJ_L~~---- Sheet _ _13 ____ of /(.a_ CE p- .3.00) ERG NO.: E'-;;;;i.. INITIATING CUES: 5t~ G'e.11. ?,-ess dec.~1:11..~1~!1. u. ... c.,~+,..11,b:J STEP NO.: A ( -4) o,- Stm Ge"- c.c,....,fl._t-el_y de?r,:.55,.r*>-'~. N0.: _ _~ - - TERMINATING CUES: Fll.u.lt..-d SG' C5) :r solz.-t"eJ 1'\ IV\, IMI-Z.E!- . REMARKS: BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS 1
.s Verb System/
Subsystem Component I . . . . . i**W I** ~* l *z~t Atl/ Direction Range
/
UnHM Rale l co0 c1 JJ
~
fl u
~.
ill I tr
'tJ I I
~
~
Comment*
!t~l.l
~
- if ,I 0-
'.kl 0 b serve. '? c.s/st.,,Gr,., 'B \OUJJo .., , _ ?os,"t",o"'- Jose A. Uo.se- NIA tlJr\ N}A '2.0 f'I E do- '7 Sec.
'\/olves
,) 7 c...\() 5 -e.. ?,cs/ ~n,, c; . . . 3/o,m:iow>1.
\/tr Ives
<) 05 ,f;on., NDYd. do_j~ NI t\ NI~ lll I\
2.0 5<<- N ;)..l, :i.s ,~ C..\o ~e, Vc.S($+,~Ge"'
- ~\~w~ow..t\.
'-f 1t l"e .s
<? ns, t.o"'
\
c.ll""d. ~05,C.,..
"-\ 11\ ~ll\ !IJII'\ rJ/,1. N E d{)S4?, /..uc"~
PLANT: _ _>>_;;._u...:...:RL-'-'Rj4------ _ UNIT:___._*I_,_4_d-.......,___ ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: C,e \Q \LS O tsJ DATE: Sheet I I 't
- I l1p { 8 5' of I (o
( E f- 3. oo) p, w i:li..J,M-~ J..vv J.:, v<. ERG - SOA&eJa..=Lu ~ " ' UN1u-.,\....ol\o!ol't NAME: re.uL.,:ED \
~TFAM 4\h;1££.e.:ID~!>Ol.,I\D O I'.! NO.: E'-~ INITIATING CUES:M 611~:t.6tJ ~1.-l,O., ,1..o_;',~.Q.J,.L'U,,.C'd STEP NAME: C.1\£:Cll. <!~* LEVEL- tw/U,.A"IF:(s. :::n-rt-1'1 <.') NO.: .,S (5) * *-*-. - T o TASK NAME: Jr,J\1tJIBIN A-l)J,;-Gl\ll\IE c:,:r: L..EYe;i..... NO.: TERMINATING CUES: <!.ST I~\ -,~d o.~~._,.a,_\.q_- ,
~ *........ l'i ~ l'r\ fl.It a.d..A~o.>1..
TASK OBJECTIVE: -,:0 rft511B. &~EG\l,f,TI;. ~uc..nou PRC:>S.u.&.e . --nr ~O\..UJ:..) u
----------------....,,...-------+-*------ REMARKS:
NATURE OF TASK: Continuous _ ___.Z"----- Discrete ________ BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS V*tb Systeml Component Value/ Unll1I Comment, Subsy1t*m Range Rat* \ W\t:M,hw C.N C.~T f\\'.)ovc. ~10 o/o 10 Ne.A. t-J/A rJ IE d-.
- .)_ t\J.~ fl\ f..\N T~~e.,Nt. - sv.c..nor..) ore~ N(f\ ~/Pr; IIJI~ ,~
sec.. rJ 3 ~ Sw;\-&- ~ o..\\~1\.:~,o:h. >,0.,J bR\\/t'f\l 11.i:1N wll>W\ ~~\ (!. Pu..rn.P I U~\Nt,
~\\Je:t-l A:~V'J PIA.IMP
PLANT: -~~ ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) _s. .u.......B~'=1'-+--*___ UNIT: _\.,__t-->--=-~--=------
- Sheet - ~ ' - of
- 5'. l VJ BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Velb System/ Component Parameter Value/ Units/ Comments Subsystem Range Aste
,._ () CA I .s ,,. ..,/ /(..,
b:J d,2.,,,~ t;.y .
.~11\
Opvo.\w ~ f1.u;' i ~* c.. . o.clhv;~ : , ~
~ow, a-\\ s.M.
~.
- 2. ~k ~~ t-1..S
~\00-~";~ \,.es;,.
M~/"...- ~---b
~,............
'So lu.~is~il
~WN:l'":-1 VW.i.ati~)
~
Se-\-~"'-.+
'KIi\
U.c1/~c.
~It\ *..t1" !"1/1\
" IMMPo\o.k~
~
~ toY s ,
,aA,o1i<l\.\
1'£\lctke
*"-\aw\ ste ......... \,,,e..
t.-(!. L.ot1M.,t-'--\
-t'l)JI.FW ?""'f eleho~
se 'o\o<tJ.lo...,,,,_ f~~OV\ ~~
~ I\-< , Je,-\-c..-
3, ~-bit- A.~ I
'E ><.h.. ... ~t" s.ec.o-,J1.1~ ~~\OkL\\\11\'I tJ\or/ 'r,..,-
"1IA
\!fr\ Nii\ Ei"
~~
E.1 . ,~ ;rul,~~ ~
\.le, Ice-(Se~
fO.i\,o..\.iCM "i E.
'°'°' ~~\ J ?)O ~
t -~ '~c)IM ~e,(o1~ I //
~ ~.\-v_~ I~~-~ I.
PLANT: _ _S_u=.....!...>R'"'--'~>...:,,_/_ _ _ _ _ UNIT: _,_J~-~-- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) REVIEWER: CE. lJJ \L !:;;: 0 J Sheet _ _____.,\ID"- of \ le DATE:_-+//..L.::Jlo==-1-/.=f?=.::, _ _ __ r, (EP-3-oo) ERG NAME: (AuLTE1) %::e&m t:\u.lt.Rf\TDR \$(.;Ll\1l0N NO.: c-~ STEP NAME:c,o IP E-1, 1--0S'a: Of Bl;AC.TOO.. Ol'l,' * * ' - -
- NO.: 3- C1)
TASK NAME: 60 JD E -1.. NO.: _ _ _ __ TASK OBJECTIVE:-::ro Di':U'.t opel{()J"O:C -h, e J A . ~ owufCio:\. ewAoCl;.,r...a NATURE OF TASK: Continuous _ _ _ _ __ Discrete-~--- BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb Sy1leml Component Perameter Comment* Subsy1tem tJ Ei
B-2 ACTION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
SUMMARY
(AIRS) EXAMPLES
PLANT: _ _
- s_-\.A_"_,.._,'f'-~---s_______ uN,r: 1 ,a.
- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
SUMMARY
(AIRS) 0R1a1NATOR: ~- E[o1fz. Sheet_+~---- DATE:
- 31.,.,,/1?0
~ e,7iJ{2-
.....~---------.
REVIEWER: DA'f'.E: W/fS SORT BLOCK ..-~--
SUMMARY
OF REQUIREMENTS BLOCK VERIFICATION
SUMMARY
BLOCK REOS TYPE: Acl V lnl1111110- - VALUEIRANGE:_.'il'-11-w..wii.....,.,....,...~ e.. UNITS..* _ _ _ _.....,...._ _ __ DEVICE PASS FAIL SYSTEM : AF vi COMPONENT: AF w S,:w i s.oljpgp v~lve<i PARAMETER: Po~:l= °"' PRECISION: -----1,,16,,\,1----- AESPONSE TIME:---~---....- - REMARKS: INDIVIDUAL DETAILS V* ...... C1w1111 II N/lt 5 . c.105'? N/R Al/"9 ,.J clo~. N/lt IV/II N/lt 5 N E(A-0.0 13 1'/lt 5 : close closeA 111/,i ..vi~ N E-2. )' /A 7 1.,c ~c.JJe c/asec/ N/11 Al//1 N ES-o,/ C, rJ}'I ;i_ c~'us-f orn
#,,-c,7'//e N/11-
/fl/A-A//A N//1 N
N
/A 5 ?J;u.s-f tS-O./
5-0-I (, t'=S-0,/
' ,J/A 9 c/ose c::.*/cse I;;;. N/A 17 47efe,1s f-
"7'-j/'C, /I/<"'.
111/1' ,v/lf N
*s_~_s____
- ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
SUMMARY
(AIRS)
- Shee't ..1&J.t:.o;.;;8..__ _ __
PLANT: _ _ UNIT: \ 9'J..* ORIGINATOR: REVIEWER: z_ '}e_* 1
- i). Jj \ s I fz.
DATE; DATE: --~"'-+-~+
=h,/r 8_-S-1,;;_ _____
SORT BLOCK
SUMMARY
OF REQUIREMENTS BLOCK VERIFICATION
SUMMARY
BLOCK REOS TYPE: Act lnlo V:: VALUEIRANGE:_.;:;o...-_9,,___5_ _ __ DEVICE FAIL Bf S
~Yo~------ PASS 0
SYSTEM : UNITS* (q !COMPONENT: Pf;-z..~ 0 PANEL PRECISION: ----'/~ PARAMETER:::~
, _:- \""'q,:":~...[::::::::::
.... RESPONSE TIME: ft (A REMARKS:
INDIVIDUAL DETAILS lo Veda
........ Valuel UnHII Colnnlenl*
au~ r- --. c-3 :J9 ti/A ,7 "onilOr B e ~ (1s) a...J5o o/o y L3C2.J' cyo ~' ad'1e.rse. C::on -\-ci, "n ,e, d E-3 ..:)(\ NIA. 3 Hon:-bC'" t':>£~ 5o ~nJ(;s O/o y [roo] z " I \ ** E:?. :J<"-\ NIA. L\ t-.\ ()(\ I \.or I .P.. bol/e_ 75 % y (oO o;Q I\
'\ H r--~ 35 0 A~(us+ c\bo"e. 0/o N/A, ! 80 "I 95 0/u
,~
\ I I\ \\
I ES-I.\ I ! Ob~cve d~ tS 0/c:.,
~ ._./o ..
E~..:20\ (:~o) Ff<.-L3 ~
"'~
~IA 4 OCose<1e
- Nor11for e,o.al ~ ~~ t!:>/o 'N"' 1\
1r\ bane\ L{O - roo 01o 'I
-I ,3 7 q
wrA 5 Obse,cve 8\o(..l\('.. \5 o/o 'I 30 % ror ad'-'erse. C01k,<Hrent
~/,\ \ Ob~rv~ cibcve 80 0/a N C,o I\ I\
\ I f'.k.- J3 l'o 1'11~ a E'5-JJ Co N/11. \
Owuve. bdo:..v 15 . c,/o l'J ,:,U . \ ' .. II Mo(\;.\or b.Gt.low 15 e>/o y 3() " \ I (I 0-3.3 6 tJ1~ ;;;._
.s-.s.s fo "1/A ?,
Ho(\,* ~or f-10.,lh>r beh-u,ze I 5~a ... d 50 % y 3U
\ ' u 11, y
1-:ie~:e'"' 5o anJ(1s °"/u y <ou \\ I\
-3.~ 6 Nil\ 1--,\o,*,,\-c,r Ab<> v-<. ,s 01~ ,, ,,
I< ()
- s....
PLANT: ___ J¢..lS:~c..yr..:P~S _______ UNIT: ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
SUMMARY
(AIRS) t t 6. ORIGINATOR: 1--\. n-al"'lchc:z.' S,iee-r 7L REVIEWER: ?,
- p. I fi \ tk SORT ILOCIC
SUMMARY
OF REQUIREMENTS BLOCK VERIFICATION
SUMMARY
BLOCK REOS nPE: Acl 1111* v' YALU8RANGE~:--C?~*.2.,...._________ SYSTEM : _..Q __ c.________ u*Nns* §."ti
- DEVICE PASS FA'L COMPONENT: Bfrf Seal \ '=-6t'¢ 49 ,RECISION: 15, ii\ e) PM. 1.D. No PANEL PARAMETER: f Ip w ; RESPONSE TIM ...E:._.C'..,(A....._ _ __ F,:2..-'2. -1..si./ S A.CS/ Qc;P ')(.
t:R-1-251f1'3,. Qr<1'i<c.P )l IIEMARKS: INDIVIDUAL DETAILS C,
- I
...., c, ......
t=b\*l.1 ~s t(/11\ o.~ ~pM y }(o Sectl(- o"'- \'{~111A ~ee.o.,.cL.u- - \-,~~"" 1 ~ ECA-1.\ ;;.o t-(/ft belo~ o.'2.. sc.o-l<<l , \o .... t not -&4,. ~~ reC#rder- it ~--1 f.
~~ y*
l:CA-3.3 35 ti/ft ~ ~L bc2,.lo'4.I o."2 '3Ptv\ y ES-'32 IQ. ij/1\ 1 ~"2 I 6:2.(ow o. "2. s~'V,. y E3-3,3 tJ.. tt/~ :i ~~<Ve \es;;.U,aA o.2 ~p~ y fS-3.I 10 . .,I\ 2. IY'lon~~r be.\ow 0.2 ES-(.:1., ~q N{A '2- OhseN~ b£foc..v
'2)P*'h '/
D,2. sr~n 'j
APPENDIX C SCENARIOS FOR VALIDATION WALK-THROUGHS
- C-1
- SCENARIOS FOR VALIDATION WALK-THROUGHS This appendix describes scenarios employed in the EOP walk-throughs for the validation of control room functions. Each scenario describes the assumptions aboutplant conditions and the procedures that were involved in the scenario.
- Scenario 1 Scenario:
Auto voltage regulator failure on main generator caused by over excitation causing generator trip followed by reactor trip *. Simulator Malfunction No.: MEL 190 Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-1.01 Reactor Trip Recovery Safety Functions Challenged: Heat sink, subcritically, RCS inventory Scenario 2 Scenario: Tube rupture in one steam generator. eves charging flow off scale high. Simulator Malfunction No.: MPS 810 Procedure Used in Scenario: EP-4.00 Steam Generator Tube Rupture Safety Functions Challenged: RCS inventory, heat sink Scenario 3 Scenario: Reactor coolant system leak into containment, 350 gpm (LOCA). Simulator Malfunction No.: PS 3030 Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-2.0ff Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant EP-2.01 SI Termination EP-2.02 Post LOCA Cooldown and Depressurization EP-2.03 Transfer to Cold Leg Recirculation EP-2.04 Transfer to Hot Leg Recirculation
- Safety Functions Challenged: Containment integrity, core cooling, RCS inventory, RCS Scenario 4 Scenario:
pressure Inadequate core cooling caused by total loss of all feedwater with ATWS. Simulator Malfunction No.: Custom Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-LOO Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-2.00 Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant ECA-1.00 Loss of all AC Power FRP-H.1 Response to Loss of Secondary Heat Sink FRP-C.1 Response to Inadequate Core .Cooling FRP-S.1 Response to _Nuclear Power Generator/ATWS Safety Functions Challenged: Heat sink, core cooling Scenario 5 Scenario: Tube rupture in one steam generator.
- Simulator Malfunction No.: MPS 810 Procedures Used _in Scenario:
EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-4.00 Steam Generator Tube' Rupture EP-4.01 Post-SGTR Cooldown using Backfill EP-4.02 Post-SGTR Cooldown using Blowdown EP-4.03 Post-SGTR Cooldown using Steam Dump Safety Functions Challenged: RCS inve*ntory, heat sink Scenario 6 Scenario Natural circulation cooldown. Simulator Malfunction No.: Custom Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.02A Natural Circulation Cooldown Safety Function Challenged: Core cooling
- Scenario 7 Scenario:
Large break LOCA (double ended sheer). Containment spray locked out. Simulator Malfunction No.: Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-2.00 Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant FRP-Z.1 Response to High Containment Pressure Safety Functions Challenged: RCS inventory, core cooling, containment integrity, RCS pressure Scenario 8 Scenario: ATWS followed by loss of off-site power. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection FRP-S.1 Response to Nuclear Power Generation/ATWS
- Safety Functions Challenged: Subcritically, RCS integrity Scenario 9 Scenario:
Steam generators A and B tubes failed simultaneously with 100 gpm and 50 gpm leak, respectively. Steam generator C tubes failed five minutes later with 100 gpm leak. Simulator Malfunction No.: MPS 810 Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-4.00 Steam Generator Tube Rupture Safety Functions Challenged: RCS inventory, heat sink Scenario 10 Scenario Natural circulation cooldown with void in head, no RVLIS. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through
Procedure Used in Scenario: EP-1.02C Natural Circulation Cooldown with Void in Rx Vessel (without RVLIS) Safety Function Challenged: Core cooling Scenario 11 Scenario: Natural circulation cooldown with RVLIS. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: EP-1.02B Natural Circulation Cooldown. with Void in Rx Vessel (with RVLIS) Safety Function Challenged: Core cooling Scenario 12 Scenario: Faulted steam generator isolation. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: EP-3.00 Faulted Steam *aenerator Isolation Safety Function Challenged: Secondary integrity Scenario 13 Scenario: Degraded core cooling. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: FRP-C.2 Response to Degraded Core Cooling Safety Functions Challenged: Core cooling Scenario 14 Scenario: Steam generator overpressure. Steam generator pressure greater than 1135 psig. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: FRP-H.2 Response to Steam Generator Overpressure
Safety Function Challenged: Secondary integrity Scenario 15 Scenario: Loss of core shutdown. Intermediate range flux greater than 1 E-10 amps. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walle-through Procedure Used in Scenario: 1 FRP-S.2 Response to Loss of Core Shutdown Safety Function Challenged: Subcriticality Scenario 16 Scenario: Steam generator narrow range level greater than 75%. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: FRP-H.3 Response to Steam Generator High Level Safety Function Challenged: Heat sink
,.~
- ct1:0NTROL -ROOM DESIGN REVIEW FINAL
SUMMARY
REPORT* VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Surry Power Station
* . Volume 2
APPENDIX D HEDREPORTS
- D-1
ttMlN ENSirEERINS DISCRB>At£Y REPORT 13/17/86
- TITLE SURRY 28111111 CCJfTRCl. ROll AMBIENT LI6HTIN6 TOO VARIABLE lMIT I CODEC RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSMENT STATUS
_ III-8 LAST REVIEW DATE 13/15/86
.,_. ERROR:
JIELAY/ERROR IN RESPCJ6ES, POSSIBLE EOOIPIENT IIRFIICTION Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: BRIGHT Ll6HTIN6 C'.AUSES GLARE, DURING BULB REPl.ACEMENT DIRT AND DEBRIS Fiu.s ON* C£WTROL BOA RDS, SOME AREAS DARK 8710 PARAGRAPH NU!IIB£R: 6.1.5. 7.A.2 SUS6ESTED BACl{FIT: PERFORM LI6HTIN6 STUDY, REVISE LI6HTIN6 TO MEET ttlREG-0710
*** DISPOSITION:
PERFORM LIGHTING STUDY TO ID .9.Jt..B/REFLECTOR OR<<S, OTIER c:tAEES TO LI6HT FIXT _ URES. REFER TO DS-11 l ~ > . -*~-:::~ DATA CXUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE ttJIBER: TP- 1. 1 WORKSPACE SURVEY RE~S: PI-12 LOCATION COMPOrENT NAfilE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CR !MID LTN6 ff NlT IN INV FILE 1 DIFFUS Pfi.S ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 Fil.SE CEIUE ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
HUAAN £N61NEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/27/86 SURRY ~IT0 CODEC ASSESSrENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY SiA,JS DATE
. ~ ~TROL AWi HAS COLD AREAS ENS III-9 07/ll/B:
~ ERROR: (
DELAY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPOOSE /* fff PRCJBLEIII DESCRIPTION: CONTROL ROOil ~ COLD AREAS, FLI.CTUATIN6 TEll'ERATURE 1700 PARAGRAPH NlJll!BER: 6.1. 5. l, B 6. 1. 5. 2. B SUS6ESiED BACKFIT: INSTALL ADJUSTABLE BAFFLES OVER AIR DUCTING, AD,IINISTRATIVELY CONTRDL_THERMOSTAT SETTINGS fff DISPOSITION: INVESTIGATE INSTALLATION OF BAFFLES TO REDUCE DRAFTS. DATA CCUECTICN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUNBER: TP-1. 4 HVAC SURVEY RBIARKS: PI-28 I IDIS INVOI.VED: lllRK NJIBER
- LOCATION CCJIIIPOrENT NA.IIE SYST£JI! SUBSYSTEl'I VENTILATION ff r<<JT IN INV FILE*
i
ti.A EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPA1£Y REPORT 13/17/86
- l£D NO 20000003 IJlERATIOE NOT VERIFIED TITLE SURRY ~IT I CODEC UNDER EJIERSENCY LIBHTll'E RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSMENT STATUS III-8 LAST REVIEW DATE 13/15/86
~ ERROR:
ERROR OR DELAY IN !PERATOR RE~S
**4 PRCJBl.811 DESCRIPTION:
CO.OR DIFFERENTIATIOO LWSURE IN EJIIER LI6HTIN6 CONDITIONS, CR OPERATI~ DIFFICULT IN EJIIER LISHT1"1i 8780 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.1.5.3.H SU66£STED .BACKFIT: VERiFYIDOCt.JIENT CR OPERATOR RESPONSES LWDER EJIIERSOCY LI9fTIN6 CONDITIONS
**4 DISPOSITION:
REFER TO DS-10 120000009).
- -tt'* . DATA CO..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUMBER:
TP- l, 5 ILLUIHNATION SURVEY RalARKS: PI-31. EVALUATE OPERATIONS UNDER EJIIER L1SHTIN6 CONDITIONS ITEAS INVOLVED: LOCATION COl!PO"eiT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII 01ER LISHTN6 H t<<JT IN INV FILE t
HlJIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/27/86
- ~
HED NO AMBIENT NOISE TOO HISH IN CR. TITLE SURRY UN IT9 CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESS~NT STATUS II -S LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 ENG
~ ERROR:
JIIAY CAUSE CIJlilltJNICATION ERRORS/INABILITY TO DETECT AUDITORY SIGNALS. CAUSES CPERATOR FATJ6l£/STRESS. fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION: AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL TOO HI6H IN CR. INiIBITS COlftJNICATION. OPERATORS COll>L.AIN,OF HEADACHE s. 17'10 PARAGRAPH M.IPIBER: 6.1.5.5.C 6.1.5.5.D SUGGESTED BACl<FIT: LJIIIIT ACCESS TO CR ON DAY SHIFT. DISTRIBUTE LOWER POWERED SP'E:RS STRATESICALLY. ADJUST A LAR!II IORNS fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO DS-1?. (20000011)
- t**,*
DATA ro..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.MBER: TP-1.6 AIIIBIENT NOISE SURVEY RalARKS: PI-33 IIDIS INVOLYED: JIIARK NJIIBER LOCATION ~NT NAfllE SYSTEJI! SUBSYSTEfll
~~~~-----
AIIIB t()ISE ff NOT IN INV FILE t
HlM EN6INEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02./27/86 SURRY .UNIT8 CODE ASSE~T LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~ ~TRLCTION ACTIVITIES NOT REGLlATED IN CR TO ~TRIX. NOISE ~T 81/07/85 IUA4 ERROR:
ERROR OR ~y IN DETECTING URIIIS ~ AUDIBLE SISNAI..S m PROBL9I DESCRIPTION: LOOD t()ISE ACTIVITES ICONSTRLCTION/~INT~> IN CR DURING DAY SHIFT. IPERATORS aN<<JT H EAR ~ 1780 PARAGRAPH tUIBER: 6.1.5.5.D SUOO£STED BACl<FIT: SDEDUlE HI6H-NJISE MINT~ ACTIVITIES FOR LOW OPERATIONS PERIODS fff DISPOSITION: f() ACTION. ADPIIN CONTROL IN PU~E TO DISTRIBUTE HI6H-N0ISE ACTIVITIES ACROSS SHI FTS. INVESTIGATE t<<JISE SOURCES* DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJJIIBER: TP-1.6 AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-34. ADflIN PR<X:: SS HAS CONTROL OVER ACTIVITIES. ITBIS INVCl.VED: NARK NJIBER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAfllE SYSTEfll - SUBSYST91 IDNSTRLCTICIN ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 flAINT8"a ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
~ EN61NEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02./27/86 SURRY llHT0 COD£ C ASSESSf!IENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20000006 ~TR(l. RCO! IDl>ERATURE AND KJIIIDITY. ENS III-9 05/17/85
~ ERROR:
~YANCE/DISCOIFORT. REDUC£D coraNTRATION. IEl(JRY l..i>AIRPIE NT.
fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION: DRY BtlB TEJIIPERATURE IS t<<JT 11AINTAH£D WITHIN THE SHADEDAREA !DFORT ZONE OF EXHIBIT. 0708 PARASRAPH NlJIBER: 6.1.5.1,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: DETEA,IINE DESIRABLE TEl'IPERATURE, AND ENSURE TEIIPERATURE _REJIAINS CONST~T. fff DISPOSITION: RERER TO PI-28 (20000002). DATA Cll..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl!IBER: TP-1.4 HYAC SURVEY IEIARl<S: _ DS-1
!Tats I NVCl. VED:
IIARI< NJIIIBER LOCATION COllflCJ£NT ~ SYSTElll SUBSYSTEIII
~ CR AIR H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
~ EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY R£Pi.in, 02./27/86.
SURRY UNIT0 CODEC ASSESS111£NT LAST REVIEW HED t(I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2N00007 f()TlCEABI..E VENTILATION DRAUGHT. III-9 85/17/85 HllAI ERROR: IP£RATOR ANNlYArCE/DI9rof=ORT. REDOCES/IMPAIRS CPERATOR COIC ENTRATION.
. tH PAOBl..01 DESCRIPTION:
THE VENTILATION OUTLET PROOOC£5 Ar(JTICEABLE DRll.lSHT IN THE AREA *raR THE. RAD JO AND NIS MELS. 1780 PARAGRAPH ttllmtR: 6.1.5.2.B SU66ESTED ~IT: PROVIDE FOR A KIRE DIFFUSED/INDIRECT AIR SUPPLY. tH DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-28 <21000002>. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE l'<<JIIIBER: TP-1.4 HVAC SURVEY RalARKS: DS-2 ITEJIIS ItMlL\JED:
~RI< NJIIIBER LOCATION C0MP0r£NT NAIIIE SYSTE!t! SUBSYSTEM CR VENTIL* ff f()T IN INV FILE t
~ EN6INEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02./27/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT@ CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSlllENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE
~ ABt()M. COHROL flOOII ILLIJIINATI~ LEVELS ENG III-8 05/08/85 It.A ERROR:
I READINS/WRITI~ ERRORS. I Hf PROBt.EJ! DESCRIPTI~: BBS ISECT 1-1, H!l l.EVELS EXCEED. SECTS 1-1, 1-2, 2-1, 2-2 Le.ER. CO!PUTER CON.SOLE AREA E XCEEDS. 1780 PARAGRAPH NU!raER: 6.1.5, 3.A SU66ESTED BAD<FlT: INCREASE LEVELS t£AR FI RE PROT, AVT Del PNLS, FRONT VERT CB, DECREASE LEVELS OF BBS. Hf DISPOSITION: PERFORP! LI6tffIN6 STIIDY TO IDENTIFY BULB CAA\!SES, REFLECTOR c~s OR OTHER CHA N6ES TO LIGHT FIXTURES. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIBER: TP-1.5 ILLI.JIHNATION SURVEY
~Rl<S:
DS-9 IT01S INVll.VED:
~RI< N.MBER LOCATION COIIIPOrENT NAPIE svsru SUBSYSTEJII ABf()R CR LVL. ff t(JT IN INV FILE t CR NORIA.. LT ff t(JT IN INV FILE 1
ltJIIIAN ENSINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 13/17/86 TITLE* SURRY LWIT I CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSMENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 13/17/86 HMlN ERROR: AEADIN6 ERRRORS. EYESTRAIN/FATISUE. lff PAOBl.01 DESCRIPTION: LISTED ITOO ~ !LARE: PROBL91S DURIFE tOrEMERGENCY CNOR!IIIL) AMBIENT Ll6HTIN6. 17e0 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.1.5.3.F SL66EST;D BACKFIT: USE LOWER INTENSITY BULBS W/ Lill DISCOIIFORT aARE RAiINGS. PROVIDE DIFFUSED/INDIRECT LIGHT ING. VISORS/SHIELDS*
. Ht DISPOSITION:
PERFORJII STUDY TO IMPROVE L1SHTIN6 AND IMPLENENT STUDY RECOflllENDATIOIE. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION iwD CODE NlMBER: TP- 1. 5 ILLIJIINATION SURVEY AEIIIARKS: DS-10 ITEIE INVOLVED: LOCATION CCM>ONENT NAME: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM C lflR-6 TURB ff NOT IN INV FILE t C MTR-RAD~ H r<<:JT IN INV FILE t C&v.t-BBS ff r()T IN INV FILE t C&YIH6 NO l ff NOT IN INV FILE t C&VPl-£6 NO 2 HNOT IN INV FILE t CIR lflRS-BBS ff NOT IN INV FILE t CIR *ITRS-NIS ff NOT IN INV FILE t CIRC ll!TRS H r<<:JT IN INV FILE t
~TERS-BBS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t CQIJER5-ro,p ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 HlRZ lflR-BBS ff NOT IN INV FILE t LEGD PBS-BBS ff NOT IN INV _FILE 1 L6ND LTS-BBS ff NOT IN INV FILE t SS CR PROCED ff NOT IN INV FILE t STEEL ON BBS ff NOT IN INV FILE t
- TR-RAD MON ff NOT IN INV FILE t
~ BEINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/17/86
!llRRY ~IT e HED NO: 20080809 IT01S INVll.. VED:
. ~RK tU!BfR LOCATION aw>oNENT NA1E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM VMTR-INT ST H NlT IN INV FILE
- VIHOR REC ff t<<:IT IN INV FILE f VM-91 6N 3-2 ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1
'JIii-VENT PNL ff t<<:IT IN INV FILE 1 WHISTE D1SP ff P<<JT IN INV FILE f
-~-
L*. TITLE HI.NIN EN6INEERIIE DISCREPlKY REPORT SURRY ~IT0 CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28NN18 ~TRCL RCDI M:KGRWND r<<JISE IKlfURS VERBAL C091UNir.ATION. ENG II -5 07/11/85 ttM ERROR: IIIIPAIRED VOICE COMJNICATIONS. DELAYED IP RESPCNlE. IP FATIG l£/iN(IY~. REDOCED cn<<:ENTRATION.
.fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION:
AT SOI£ SPEA<ER-t.ISTENER DISTAfCES. ~)JSE LYI.S Hiai Et46H TO IMPAIR COft.lNIC AT t<<IRJII/SL16 HTLY RAISED VOICE LVLS 8780 PARAGRAPH MJIIIBER: 6.1.5.5.A SUOOESTED IW<FIT: REDlCE IKKSRO.JND r<<JISE LEVELS AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE VERBAL COMUNICATI~ IS t<<JT IMPAIRED fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO DS-12 (281000811) SIN:E IT IS l()RE SPECIFIC* DATA CCl.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE t<<.Jl!!BER:
. TP-i.6 AfilBIENT NOISE SURVEY REJIIARKSt DS-11 IIDIS INVCl.VED:
IIARK NMBER LOCATION COll>()PENT NAl'IE SVSTEJII SUBSVSTE!II IIAIN CR ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t
~-
~ ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/17/86 9.JRRY um e CODE A ASSEss,.ENT LAST REVIEW HED t() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20000011 ABt()RAAI.. CD4TROL RID BACKGRCUID NOISE LEVELS.
~
ENG II -5 83/17/86 ltM ERROR: IIIPAIRED COlfl.JNICATI~. OP DISC()!IFQRT /FATISUE. HJ PROBLEI! DESCRIPTION: f(JISE LVL EXCEED 6SDB(A) IN NY AREAS OF CR. COffRIB1.JTIN6 SOURCES: PRINTERS, RCRDRS, VENT IL, ~~. PtOES, ETC 1780 PA~Rl¥>H ftJIIIBER: 6.1.s.s.B SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: Isa.ATE/R£IX.ICE f()ISES AS tt:CESSARY: USE SCKMl ABSORBING MATERIALS, SOONDPROOF ENCLOSURES 0 N EQUIP., LIMER PA VOL, ETC. fft DISPOSITION: IMP!.91£NT SU66ESTED BAO<FITS ~ ATTACHED PAGE.
- - DATA CTUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE !OBER:
TP- 1,6 ~!ENT NOISE SURVEY R91ARKS: DS-12 IIDIS INVCLVED: LOCATION mPONENT NAIIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM
~IN CR ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
tlJIIIAH EtEINEERINS DISCREPAICY REPORT 82.127/8,6
- HED NO 2'00e812 BACK6ROOND NOISE IN CR TOO HIGH.
TITLE
- SURRY ~1T0 CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 87/11/85 KJIAN ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN IJ> RESP!)EE, H* PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: r()lSE TOO HISH DUE TO t<<:IIM. OPERATION CF VENT SYS, 6AITIOUCS SYS 1U1, SIM>. LVL FLW CTRI.R RELAY OflTTER. 1710 PARAGRAPH NJIBER: 6,1,5.5.A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: INVESTIGATE WAYS TO PIUFFLE VENT SYS. PROVIDE MINTEt-8C£0N 6AITRONICS. ADJUST RELAYS TO RE Ill.CE "CHATTER"
*** DISPOSITION:
REFER TO DS-1?. (28000011). DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION i:wD CODE UBER: TP-1. 6 AIIIBIENT NOISE SURVEY RalARKS: PI-36 ITEMS INVOI..VED: MRI< MJIIIBER LOCATION CCJ,llOrENT NA.tlE SYSTEl'I SUBSYST91 FLD CNT RI.AV ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t 5"P LYL RLAY ff NOT IN INV FILE t VENT SYS f f r<<JT IN INV FILE t
\INT SYS DIIPR HNOT IN INV FILE t
~ EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAACV REPORT e2/27/86 SURRY ~IT0 CODE C ASSESS/JIENT UlST REVIEW I
TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~13 CR IDIPERATURE IS TOO CW> IN WINTER AND FLLCTUATES DURING SHIFTS. III-9 U/11/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. ; lff PROBL9! DESCRIPTIOO: CR TOO COLD IN WINTER. OPS IEAR JACKETS liiILE l<<JRKIN6, PERS ADJUST Tl£RMOSTAT CAUSINS FLOC MTIOO DURlrE SHIFTS. 1780 PARAGRAPH tOIBER: 6.1.5,1.A SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: ADfHNISTRATIVELY C()(TRCl. SETTINS OF TEJIIPERATURE. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-28 (20000002) *
- DATA ro.t.ECTIOO DESCRIPTl(); AND CODE NIJIIBER:
TP-1,4 HVAC SURVEY R91ARKS: PI-29 IIDIS INW.. VED: MRK ftMBER LOCS!TI(); cnro£NT ~ SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEl'I CR TEfJI H f(]T IN ItN FIL£ t
ID.AN OOINEERINS DISCREPAtCY REPORT 13/17/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY ~IT I CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 20000014 ANBIENT LISHTitE VARIES SI6NIFICANTLY IN CR, l'<<JTICABLE St.ARE. III-8 83/17/86
~ ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.
"* P ~ DESCRIPTION:
AREAS CJ= CR OVERLY BRIGHT, AREAS t()T ILLUll!INATED ENO.JSH.APPEARS TO BE A SISNIFI~ PROBLE Iii WITH 61..ARE. 1780 PARAGRAPH M.JMBER: 6.1. 5. 3. D 6.1.5. 3.E 6.- 1. 5. 3.F 9JSSESTED BAD<FIT: PERFORPI LI6HTIN6 STUDY TO DETERMINE SPECIFIC CORRECTION ACTIONS. CORRECT AS REUUIR£D. DISPOSITION:
"* REFER TO DS-10 (20000009).
DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP- 1. 5 ILLI.JIIIINATION SURVEY REIIIARKS: PI-30. ITE"6 INVOLVED: l'IARK NI.Jfl'.BER LOCATION ~ T NAPIE SYSTEM SUBSYSIDI CR.Afi!B LI6HT ff NH IN INV FILE t
It.A aEHEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/27/86 SURRY ~m, CODE C ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN81S A.IR.E SPACE LNWAIL IN CR FOR STORAGE IF EXPENDABLES/SPARE PTS/TOO r<<JD III-9 88/U/85 IUAI ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJ) RESPONSE.
"* PRCB..91 DESCRIPTI[)j:
ItWlfGUATE STORAGE SPACE FOR EXPNDIUS/SPARE PTS/TOOLS. EXPNDILS/SPARE PTS NJT CLEARLY YIS llti/lllARKED, <RBIARKSJ 87Nl PARAGmi OBER: 6, 1, 1, 5. D 6.1, 1. 5. E 6. S. 4.1. E 6. S. 4.1. F SU66ESTED ~IT: PROV AIIRE ~ FOR STORAGE. LABEL DRAWERS/BINS/CONTAH£RS. PROVIDE REF INDEX LIST FOR RE PlACEIENT INSTRlJIII/EGIP
"* DISPOSITI[)I:
REFER TO PI-38 (20008109} *
- DATA ClUECTJ[)j DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIBER:
TP-1.7 NAINTAirfU!ILITY SURVEY IIEMRl<S: PJ-40 ITOO INYCl.VED: IIIARK NJIIB£R LOCATION COlllOJ£NT NlE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII STORAGE SPCE H rt:IT IN INY FILE 1
~ ErEINEERHE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02./27/86
- HED I'(} TITLE SURRY t.NIT9 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE ZN90192 t<<) HIGH STcn..s OR CflIRS AVAILABLE IN ~TRO.. ROOII CCJ!PLT 91/97/85 11M ERROR:
DELAY ~/OR ERROR IN CPE:RATOR RESP!HlES Hf PROBLEJII DESCRIPTI!l;: DURING STARTUP, STINIIN3 FOR SEVERAL HOURS AT ONE BOARD CSllSES EXTRaE ~RATOR FATIGUE 9700 PARAGRAPH r<<NER: 6.1.1. 3. c. 2 SU36ESTED BA()(FIT: SUPPLY CONTROL ROOII WITH HIGH STOOLS/CtiHRS. Hf DISPOSITION: CORRECTED, t£!,1 CHAIRS PURC!mD AND IN P\..OC£
- DATA CO-LECTI!l; DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJll!BER:
TP-1, l li0RKSPAC£ SURVEY REMARKS: PI-3
- IT91S INVCl. VED:
~RK IOIBER LOCATION COfPl'.IPENT NA,!£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII STOOLS ff NH IN INV FILE f
~ OOINEERHE DISCREPAtCY REPORT ~/27/86 SURRY ~m, CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCleIBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN183 STORAGE FOR PROCEDURES I~TE III-9 16/0&/85 11M ER~R:
DELAY OR ERl[)R IN PERFORMirE PROCEDURES Hf PROBL9! DESCRIPTION: FILE ~/B00<St£LVES INA0£UTE FOR PROCEDURE STORAGE 17N PARAGRMi NtJIIIIER: 6.1.2. 6 SU66ESTED IW)(FIT: INCREASE AVAILABLE AREA, ~ ADD FILES/BO!J<St£1..VES AS REQUIRED Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-35 C20A0-4203l. U PROCS REil IIIIIO ~TIONS SHW...D BE STORED IN .CR. 0Tt£RS IN TUELY fAtER. CR!IIRKSJ DATA co.J.ECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE NJll!BER: TP-1. 1 .<<JRKSPACE SURVEY REMRl<S: PI-7, EP,AP,FRP,ECA,FCA,ARP STORED IN CR. OTHERS IN ANNEX, IT91S INVrA.'JED: MRI< NJIIBER LOCATION CCJllOr£NT tillE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM ST~ ~IT ff NJT IN INV FILE t
/.
ltM EN6INEERitE DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY lime CODE C e2/27/86
. ASSESSP1£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 2.NN114 r<<I IIKJVEAa.E CART FOR USE AT CCWTRCl. IOlRD III-9 81/38/86
~ ERROR:
DELAY OR ERROR IN Cll£RATOR RESPIMIES ff§ PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: [l)ERATORS ~ NJ ll£RE TO P'Lll PROCEDURES lf£N PEIIFORMIN6 TESTIN3/TASK SEll£taS AT COO RCl. IOlRD 1710 PARAGRAPH tOIBe:R: 6.1.2.6 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE MJVEAaE CARTS FOR SOi ~IT ff§ DISPOSITION: REFER TO Pllffl PROCESS IDRJTER lP6RADE TD PROVIDE ADEQUATE l()RKSPACE PER PI-91
** (28188381 l
- DATA CW.ECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE N.IPIBER:
TP-1. 1 l()RKSPACE SURVEY AEMRKS: PI-8 IIDIS INVCl.lJED: NARK rulBER LOCATION COMPOf£NT ~ . SUBSYSTEfll CART ff NlT IN INV FILE t
.-iJ~T 02./27/86 SURRY ~IT0 CODE ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW t£D I() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2N801i5 DESKS/ccrGX.ES lJ<<:CIIFORTABLE, ~IRS BRO<EN llJ!PI..T 01/07/85 It.NW ERROR:
IIAY ~ DELAY OR ERROR IN RESPOOES Ill.(' TO STRESS OR FATIS lE fff PRO!UJII DESCRIPTI~: DESKS/CllSl.£5 ARE TOO LOW FOR Cl)IIFORTAIU SEATING, ~IRS BRCl<EN AND I() LDr<<R ADJUSTABLE FOR 1£I6HT. 8788 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: fi, 1,2. 7.C SU66ESTED ~IT: IIIIPROV£ LES/FOOT CLEARANCES AT DESKS~ CONSOLES, REPLACE/REPAIR BRO<EN FURNITURE fff DISPOSITION: f£W ADJUSTAIU ~IRS SH(llJ) iu.EVIATE PROB W/ RO DESK. NEW Cl'IPTR CONSOLE WIU. B E CCIEIDERED IN P-258 lJISRADE* DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTI(l.l ~ CODE PUIBER: TP-1, 1 liORKSPACE SURVEY REMRKS: PI-10 ITEMS INVCl.VED: IIARK l'OIBER LOCATION CO!flOtENT ~ svsru SUBSYST01 ADJUST CHAIR ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1 R0 1 S COOL£ ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1 II0 1S DESK ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1
tf..R E"6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT t2./27/S6 SURRY ll4IT8 CODE ASSEss.ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN186 INADE~TE PER&m.. STORAGE FACILITIES FOR CR PERSCN£L CQIIIPI..T 17/11/85 lt.R ERROR: LACK OF STDRASE FACILITIES ADDS TO a.UTTER IN CR, IIAY C$llSE ERRORS OR !RAYS IN CJ'ERATOR RESPCJEES fff PROW DESCRIPTION: I() SUITAIU, SECURE STORAGE FOR PERSOrA. BEL1NiIN6S OF CR PERS(JfEL 1710 PARAGRAPH NllmER: . 6.1.5.6.A 6.1.5.6.B Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: DETERMHE SIZE/TYPE OF LOCKERS REOOIRED ~ PROVIDE DISPOSITION: DELETE-DPS IGl KlVE STRORAS£ LOCKERS IN CR ~NEX AREA. SHOULD lilVE ADDED SPACE A FTER IUMIN BUl6 lPGRADE* DATA ctUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE FOBER: TP-1, 1 liiORKSPACE SURVEY REIIARKS: PI-11 IIDIS INVO..VED: IIARK ltMBER LOCATI~ lnmENT NAP'.£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII COOT ROO<S ff f()T IN INV FILE 1
~T l<<l<S ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 LOCKERS ff f()T IN INV FILE 1
~ EtEINEERING DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT 83/17/86
- - l£D NO TITLE SURRY I.J4IT 28000187 FLOOR COVERING DOES NOT IUEVIATE FATISLE CF STANDING e CODE C RESPONSIBILITY NOD ASSESSPIENT STATUS III-9 LAST REVIEW DATE 13/17/86
~ ERROR:
IIAY CAUSE DELAY/ERRORS IN RESPONSE DUE TO FATISUE CF STANDIN 6 FOR LONS PERIODS OF TIME. fff PROBLEfll DESCRIPTION: CR CARPETING TOO THIN/t(J PADDING DlJSING FATIGUE. CARPET 61..LE PERJIIAtENT, CAtffJT CLEAN/MAIN TAIN. 8700 PARAGRAPH ttJNBER: 6.1.S. 7.A.5 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IHSTALL PADDING, NEW CARP£TIN6, ENSURE EASY CLEANP/IIAINTENAtCE. _PROVIDE HIGH STCO..S/D4lIR s. fff DISPOSITI~: NEW CARPET WITH PADDING WILL BE INSTALLED*
- DATA co..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP- 1, 1 WORKSPACE SURVEY RalARKS: PI-13 IIDIS INVOL.VED: LOCATION llJIIJIONENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CARPET H t(JT IN INV FILE t
It.A OOINEERIN8 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02./27/S6 SURRY ltme CODE ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW l£D N) TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN188 lMRESTRICTED ACCESS TO RESTRCXM6/KITD£N NlT AVAILABLE TO IJlERATOR co.PL.T 11/17/85 ti.A ERROR:
. ERROR/DELAY IN RESPCJEE\ IEERAL Cl)RISICIN, AND REDOCED ATIE NTIC~ TO JOB DUTIES, POSSIBLE J(m DISSATISFACTI~
fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: CR O?S 00 NJT ~ lN..llilITED ACCESS TO FACILITIES, 1mCt£N INADEOOOTE, CARD DOOR TO RESTR!II
, t£ED 4TH [I) ON BKSHT 1780 PARAGRAPH tUIBER:
6.1.5.7.B 6.1.5.7.C SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:
!()YE CARD DOOR PAST FACILITIES, IJlGRADE KITCHEN, PROVIDEADEQUATE RELIEF CPERATORS ON BACK SHIFT tH DISPOSITIQtil:
IIESTR,11 W/ PRESENT '""HE Mir()R lN!DNENIENCE. r() COO<IM3 ALLCMED IN ICR, f:WY OT t£R WAY I~ISTENT W/ 8 HR DAY DATA co..l£CTION DESCRIPTION fWD CODE N.JMBER: TP-1. 1* ICRl<SPACE SURVEY 119W,\RKS: PI-1~ ITEJIIS UMl.',{I): fARI< NMBER LOCATIQtil C(Jl)(Jf£NT NA!£ SYST91 SUBSYSTEM KIT0£N ff ffJT IN UN FILE t RESTRCKM ff r<<JT IN Irtv FILE t
~ ENS1NEER1tt3 DISCREPAtCY REPORT t2./27/S6 SURRY UNITS CODE C ASSESSIJIENT LAST REVIEW HED f(l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tNIB189 INADEDUATE SUPPLY CF EXPENDAll.ES/SPARE PARTS IN CR. NOD 111-9 11/07/85 tl.R ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR REWEE ~ ~ T O EOO IPIENT DI£ TD CF USE CF WIDS PAPER/SlJlPI..IES. fff PROSLflll DESCRIPTION:
!UlPI..Y CF EXPENDABLES/SPARE PARTS NH IIJNITOAED/STOO<ED. STORERW! CI.OSED DURING BAD< SHIF TS.
1780 PARAGRAPH N.MBER:
- 6. I, 1,5,A 6.1.1.5.B 6.1. I.S.F SU66ESTED BOCl<FIT:
~INISTRATIVE Cl){TROL OVER STCJREROOIII SIJIPLIES. ASSISN RESPONSIBILITY OF INVENTORY TO 198 ER CF STAFF.
fff DISPOSITION: STUDY FEASABIUTY CF *IRE STORAGE, Il'IPROVE ADfilIN CONTROL
- DATA CCLLECTION DESCRIPTION lr4D CODE UBER:
TP-1.7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY . REMRl<S: PI-38. REVIEW AFTER lP6RAD£ (S£E ILSO PI-4e 20800015) IIDIS INVO..VED: flARK N.MB£R LOCATION CQIIJ)()ENT tM: SYSTEII SUBSYSTa, CHART PAPER ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t IN< PADS ff NOT IN INV FILE t Hf< PENS ff f(IT IN INV FILE t LIGHT BU.BS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t r()TE ~ ff NJT IN INV FILE t PRINTER PfilR ff f(IT IN INV FILE t RCDR REPAIRS H f(IT IN INV FILE t SPCL TOO.S ff l'()T IN INV FILE t
~ ENGINEERING DISCREPAICY REPORT 82/27/86
- HED t(J TITLE SURRY lJHT0 CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2NN118 TID.S FOR IIEPUICIN6 EXPENDABLES/SPARE PARTS t(JT AVAIL.ABLE IN CR. III-9 88/87/85 K.NW ERIIJR:
IIAY ~ PERSIIA. INJURY TO CJ>ERATORS AND DAliA,£ TO EQUIPIE NT DlE TO IPERATOR RESPONSE ERRORS. tff PROBLal DESCRIPTll*: IIECESSARY REPAIR TO!X.S IHIVAILAIU IN CR, OPERATORS USE IA<ESHIFT TOOLS. SfJETIIES UT WA IT FOR SKJ~ TO FIX 1710 PARASRM-i fOIBER: 6.1.1.5.C 6.3.3.l.C,2 6.3.3.l.C.3 SU66£STED BACKFIT: PROVIDE ILL NECESSARY TOOLS IN ~TITIES r£CESSARY FOR OPERATION/REPAIR. tff DISPOSITION: PROVIDE TOO..S AND IMPLEMENT ADfilI
N. PROCEDURE
TO IIRINTAININVENTORY
- DATA cw.ECTIDN DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-1.7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY REMARKS: PI-39. AE-EWLUATE lflER UP6RADE ITEJIIS INYCLUED: IIARK IUIBER L~TION COflJOr£NT PAE SYSTEJII SUBSYSIDI Jlll.B EXTRTRS ff f()T IN INV FILE* CARD PlllERS H t(JT IN INV FILE* LENS WROCHS ff t(JT IN INV FILE
- SCREWDIVERS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE*
K.A ENSINEERirE DISCREPAICY REPORT 62./27/86
- l£D I'll TITLE SURRY ~IT0 CO~
RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSPIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2'lee0116 l<<l 1¥:CESS TO BEIEIR. REFEREra ~TERill. IN llHT 2. C(Nlt_T 87/15/85 ti.A ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. / fff PROfLEII DESCRIPTI~:
&aERAL REFEREr<<::£ IIIATERill. IS NlT AVAILABU:.TO lMIT 2 IP£RATIIE PERSOfEL (STORED IN IJ4IT l Ol.Yl.
1788 PARAGRAPH NJIIER: 6.1,2.6
!l.166ESTED ~FIT:
ADD SETS c.= ~ REF ~/DOCIIIENTS COlill'ION TO BOTH UNITS, STORE IN U-2 OR RELOCATE STORA 6E SO f()TH ~ ACCESS fff DISPOSITION: llfLETE-ffATERill.S l'IJT APPROPRIATE FOR STORAGE IN CR - IO..lD INCREASE REQUIRDIENTS OF IOrESSENTill. PERSCNEL DATA ClllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE. UBER: TP-1, 1 .<<lRKSPACE SURVEY REIIIARKS: PI-9 ITEJIIS lfMl. VEih IIIAIIK N.NER LOCATION cc>>POr£NT ~ SYSTEJll SUBSYSTE/11 STORAGE H t()T IN INV FILE t
tLMlN EN6INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT I: 9JRRY 1.1me roIE ASSE:-SliE!*ff LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESP(MiIBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN281 NOT ENOUGH TELEPt0£ INSTRLIENT/JID<S FOR USE IN CR. C(MPLT 97/11/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY IN 6IVIrE/RECEIVIN6 EQUIP STATUS I~O. Hf PROa.01 DESCRIPTION: NOT Eta.J6H TELEPt<<M: JNSTIIIJENTS/J~ AT MAIM .<<IRK STATI!Ni IN CR. uee PARAGRAPH NJIBER: 6.1.1.3.C.2 SOOGESTED BACKFIT: DETERINE t<<J. OF INSTRUM r£EDED BY CR PERSOffL, & l()ST ADVANTAGEOUS POSITIONING CF ADDITIO l'fL JID<S: INSTu. . tH DISPOSITION: DELETE- EMERSOCY RESPONSE I.PGRADE PER rtlREIH696 NlW PROVIDE ADEQUATE a¥1ABILIT
- IES.
DATA CQ.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIBER: TP-1.1 l<<lRl<SPACE SURVEY *
~Rl<S:
PI-5 IIDIS INYO..YED: IIIARt< NJ&:R LOCATION CCMlOfENT NA,£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII J~ H f()T IN INV FIL£* TELEPtOES H t<<JT IN INV FIL£
- IOIAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPAfCY REPORT V/2127/86
- l£D r<<J TITLE SURRY lime CODE B W82 CJIERATORS QN(JT COIUICATE lffILE WEARING BREATHil'E APPARATUS RE~IBILITY ASSESSf!ENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE tl/07/85 IUAI ERROR:
DELAY OR ERROR IN CJIERATOR REsmEES
**- PROaBI DESCRIPTI~:
DIFFIW.T TO COPIIJNICATE/USE Pt0£/6AITRONICS SYSTDI lffILE IEARIN6 BREATHIN3 ~Tl.IS 8788 PARAGRAPH MMBER: 6.1.4.1.s 6.2.1.a.s 6.2.1.a.c SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: PROVIDE RESPIRATORS 'T FACILITATE COINJNICATIONS
**- DISPOSITI~:
PROVIDE flASK AlilPLIFIERS
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIBER:
TP-1.3 aER6£NCY EOOIPIENT RENlft(S: PI-26 ITEJIIS INVCk.VED : MRI< l'Ul8£R LOCATI~ COll>OfENT , - SYSTEfl SUBSYSTE/11 RESPIRATORS H NJT IN INV FILE t ~*
~ ElfiINEERIN6 D1SCR£PAt£Y REPORT t2.127/86 SURRY ~ITI CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -7
- 11/17/85 KM ERROR:
DELAY OR ERIER IN CPERATOR IESP(N;ES lff PROa..91 DESCRIPTION: 6AITRONICS/RADIOS POORLY IIAINTA1'£D, PtO£ SYS FAlLTY, INS!,FFICIENT ~S/~/UNIT s 1710 PARASRMi romER:
- 6. 2, 1, 8. A
!IJ66ESTED BfO<FIT:
PROVIDE IIAINTENIN:E CF EGUIP, ItiCREASE r(), OF ~ERS/ DMELS/1.WITS, PROVIDE 18IDSETS I. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-42 (eeeN2e5) AND PI-43 (2e800206), DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE NlJIBER: TP-1.3 aERSaa EGUIP!IENT REIIARKS: Pl-27 ITEJIIS IfMl.VED: IIARK MJIIIBER LOC.QTION IDl>OfENT ~ SYSIDI SUBSVSIDI 6AITRONICS ff r()T IN INV FILE f ROI TELE SYS ff r()T IN INV FILE t IJfV RADIOS ff f<<lT IN INV FILE t
tlA EN;JNEERIN; DISCREPA'CY REPORT 02./27/86
- TITLE 209N2e4 CO'MNTIIIA. POERED TEI.EPtOE SYSTEJII INADEUTE.
SURRY t.rme CODE B RE~IBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE 81/17/85 11.R ERROR: IIIAY ~ DELAY/ERRORS IN CPERATOR RESP!J.'SES Dll: TO INABILIT YTO CIU/RECEI'.{ CIUS. Ht Pfllll.9I DESCRIPTION:
~R(XH) NlISE/WEAI< SI6'RS ~ IfQJlllt,6 CALLS. l)W'T au WT/SET INSIDE ~s DURING 1£ INY RAI~
1710 PARAGRAPH fUIIBER:
- 6. 2. 1. 1. C. l 6. 2.1.1. C. 2 6. 2.1. 2 6. 2.1. 8. A S006ESTED BACl(FI T:
P£RFORII EOOIP. IIIJDIFICATIC*S. IJ)SRADE PLANT/OUTSIDE PUWT SYSTEJII. P£RFORPI PERIODIC IIIAINTEN i:N:E D£0(S. lff DISPOSITION: SS COOlLE WILL RELIEVE SOE PROBLEIIIS. 8696 COMJNICATIOO LPSRADE PR06f!AIII WILL CORRECT 0Tt£RS* DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND COD£ NJIIIBR: TP-2. 1 ~ICATI~ SURVEY TP-1.3 EIERSENCY ~IP1ENT REJIIARKS: PI-41. (SEE PI-5 (280002011, PI-43 (291082061). ITEJIIS INYfl..'JED: IIIARI< JUIIQ;R L.OCATI~ ~ fAi:: SYSTEJII SUBSYSIDI AOtJI PtOES ff NJT IN INV FILE 1
ttMlN ENSiteRitE DISCREPIN:Y REPORT f/2./27/86 SURRY I.NIT@ CODE B ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESP()CSIBILITY STATUS DATE W85 SCl.NO-POERED TELEPIO£ SYSTEM ItAlEOUATE. NOD II -7 81/87/85 11M ERROR: MY~ DELAY/ERROR IN 1))£RATOR RESPClEE DUE TO INABILITY TO GIVE/RECEIVE Irf=~TION ON PIJM STATUS. fff PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: J$0<5 ftlT LABa£D. !PS. l.tEURE lf£RE/IG TO US£. APIPI..IFICATION POOR. 1£ADSETS 1.NDFDRTABL E. 1710 PARAGRAPH fOIBER:
- 6. 2. 1.1. C. 1 6. 2. 1.1. C. 2 6. 2.1. 3 6. 2. 1, 8. A SOOGESTED BACKF IT:
PERFORM l<<lDIFICATIONS/UPGRADES TO SYSTEJI. PERFOR11 PERIODICS MINT~ CHEO<S/REPAIRS TO SYSTEM. fff DISPOSITION: POSSIBLY REPL~ 50.ND-PCJERED SYS W/ RADIO SYS. 6AI-T~ICS AIIIPLIFICATIOH ON S P SYS POSSIBLE <IU IA>S). DATA CCIU.ECTION DESCRIPTION IN> CODE ro!BER:
- TP-2. 1 IXMJNICATIOO SURVEY TP-1, 3 EIER6£r£Y EOOIPIENT
~Rl<S:
PI-42. RE~UATE WTER FIX. (SEE PI-S (2e000201)), IT9IS INY!l.llED: MRI< IUIBER LOCATION COl10fENT ~ SYSTEIII SUBSYSIDI ff ftJT IN INV FILE t
__ ) llllR4 SURRY EN:iINEERINi DISCIIEPAfCY REPORT
~ITI aJDE B 92./27/86 ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPl:N,IBILITY STATUS DATE 2IN8286 1W SYSTEJI INADEIUITE. II -7 11/87/85 HM ERROR: ,
MY.al.lSE DELAY/ERRORS lN Cl>ERATOR RESP(H;E FIDI INABILITY T 0 GIVE/RECEIVE UFDR*ITICW ON PUINT STATUS. 1H PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: DIST~COCRETE/Hl6H fClISE AREAS MKE A.KIES-TAU<IES INEFFECTIJL, POOR IIUNTam:E. INS lFFICIENT t0.STERS. 1781!1 PARAGmt MJIIIBER:
- 6. 2. 1, 1, C.1 6. 2.1, 1, C. 2 6. 2.1. 4 6. 2.1. 8. A S006ESTED BACl<F IT:
PERFORM l<<)J)lFICATIONS/IJl6RADES TO COIIIMICATIONS SYSIDIS. PERFORM PERIODIC .iAINTENAra CHE D(S/REPAIRS. fH DISPOSITION: -~* 1¥>PENDIX R lPSRADE SHa.l..D aJRRECT PROBt.91. RE~TE AFTER LPGRADE. DATA CCU£CTICW DESCRIPTICW ~ CODE IUIBER: TP-2.1 COMJNlCATI!Ni SURVEY TP-1,3 EJIERGENCY ElllIPIENT AEMRKS: PI-43. <SEE PI-44 (28000212), PI-5 (~l)). I TEJ11S I NV()_\JED: MAK IUIBER LOCATION COflOtENT rM: SYSTEJI SUBSYSTEM BASE STATION ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t
~ I.MITS ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t
* ~ ENSil'EERIPE DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT tc./27/86 SURRY LWITI COIE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 281N287 6AITROOICS SYSIDI IPR>EGUATE. II -7 11/87/85 tUIAt>il:
BUZZIN6/STATIC/SGUBl.IN6 ON LINES. CtM.EL CROSSOVER. INSLfFICIENT C>RfaS. SPEAKERS/~ SETS f£ED REPAIR. 1710 PARAGRAPH r<<JIIIBER:
- 6. 2. 1, 1, C.1 6. 2. 1. 1. C. 2 6. 2.1, 6 6. 2.1. 8. A SlSiESTED BACl<FIT:
PERFORM JIODIFICATIONS/1Jl6RAD£S TO SYSTEM. PERFDRP! PERIODIC 111AINTENANC£/REPAIRS. (* ( DISPOSITION: I~ROVE ROUTH£ IIIAINT, DETERPIINE CORRECTIVE ACTION TO I.Jl6RAD RELIABILITY, IF NJ T POSSIBLE mEIDER ~INS SYS DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE N.JUIER: TP-2, 1 COIIJNICATI~ SURVEY TP-1,J aERSENCY EllJIPIENT AalARl(S: PI-45. RE-EWI. fFT CHIES (SEE PI-5(~1>,PI-41(~) ITEJIIS INVCl.m>:
*lAK ltMBER LOCATION COflPOfENT NAME SYST91 SUBSYST91 GAI-TRONICS ff r<<:JT IN INV FIL£ i
~ OOINEERitE DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 621211e6 *
- >£D NO TITLE SURRY lJHTI CODE 2811188211 NO CXIIUHCATIOO Litt< BETWEEN RESTR(XJI/KIT0£N AREA AND CR.
RE~IBILITY ASSEss.ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 17/15/85 ltR ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJ> flESP(N;E. fff P110a.91 DESCRIPTION: J() tMl SETS AVAIL FOR OPS TO CO*JNICATE FIOI RESTRIVKITDi TO CR. 6AIT~IC SPt<R USlJUY OJT-<J=-oRDER IN RR/KIT 1718 PARAGRAPH MMSER: 6.1.s. 7.B.3 Sl83ESTED 8'0<FIT: INSTIU IM>SETS IN RESTRIVKITCH. ENSURE 6AITRONICS SPKRMAINTAINED/IN SERVICE, IS MMALY ADJUSTED TO ~ T Hf DISPOSITION: 6AIT~ICS AYAIL.ABL£ IN ~X *
- DATA co..L.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE IUIBER:
TP-1,l l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY RBIA~S: PI-15 ITEIE INYCl.VED: NARK rtJIBER LOCATION IDl>otENT t9IE SYSTal SUBSYSTEJII SAI-T~ICS HNOT IN INV FILE 1
EtfiINEERitE DJSCREPAtCY REPORT ltJAj 12/27/86 SURRY ~JTI CODE B ASSESSNENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN212 FIXED-BASE lW SYSTal IS J~TE. II -7 87/15/85 ttM ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJ) RESP£HlE.
._. PROa..E,I DESCRIPTION:
SYS DESIGN POOR (OW' T SPEM/LISTEN AT SAflE TIME. ) SYS PERFORM-a BAD (IEA</~S), P OOR IIAINTENAf<<:E ON SYS 1710 PA~RM-1 "-"IBER: 6.2, 1, 1,C.1 6.2.1, 1,C,2 6,2,1,5 6.2.1.8,A SUGGESTED BACKFIT: fllDIFY/EttRCE EGUIP TO LP6RADE CR/~T COPKJNICATICIHS TO OCCEPTABLE/EFFECTIVE LEVEL. PER FOIi! PERIODIC IIAINT.
'** DISPOSITION:
SYSTEJII IS SIIIR.EX - ADEQUATE FOR PURPOSE, REFER TO PI-43 (20N0286l *
- DATA tn.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tulBER:
TP-2, 1 COMUNICATIONS SURVEY
. TP-1, J EIIER6ENCY EGUIPPIENT RaARKS:
PI-44 I TEJIIS INVCl.\JED: IIARK rtJIIIER LOCATION COlflOr£NT ~ SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEM lff SYSIDI H f(JT IN INV FILE t
~ EtEH£ERI1E DISCREPAfCY REPORT ~/27/86
- 281NJ81 c:c>>RJTER RESP(JEE SUM. IIIAINIDRa TITLE SURRY
~
~ITI CODE B SYSIDI POOR.
RESPCJ4SIBILITY EN6 ASSESSIENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE 15/28/85 ttM ERROR: IIWIYS IIIAY AEIIIJ:E Tl£ PROBABILITY IF OP. ~ T ~ , AND, TH EREFORE, USE IF TtE CQIII\JTER SYSTEM. ff-I PAOBl.EM DESCRIPTION: IIESPCN;E TO IN>UT SI.CM. RECEIVE I() REsm.sE DELAY IIESSA6ES, ASSUl£S INPUT WAS l()T ACCEPTED
- LOT IF DOWN TIIIIE.
1718 PARASRMi NJIBER:
- 6. 7.1. 7.A 6. 7.1. 7.B
!l&STED ~IT:
PERIODIC IIIAINT~ D£0<S. PROVIDE RESPONSE DELAY IIIESSAGE: TO CONFIR,I t()RMI.. CQIIRJTER OPE RATI~.
- ff-I DISPOSITIClil:
lP6RADE PROCESS COfll.JTER, IJCLUDE APPROPRIATE DES16N &LOCATION OF DIPTR ~ OP IERKSTATI~ AS ACOOSIDERATION. DATA al.LECTIClil DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJIBER: TP-7.1 C()l)UTER SYSIDI REVIEW llEMRl<S: Pl--98 ITEJIIS l l'ft'Cl.VED: IIIARK ltJll£R LOCATION COf>Of£NT NAIi£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEl'I H t()T IN INV FILE t
~ Er.SINEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT 92./27/86
- l£D r<<) TITLE SURRY ~ne CODE B RESPOCSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28eee382 CCNIUTER SYST81 PROCEOORES ARE l()T lPDATED. II -7 15/28/85
.._. ERROR:
MY CAUSE DEIJIY /ERROR IN ())£~TOR RESPCN,£. fH PROSl.91 DESCRIPTI~: OR<<S TO n£ COIIRJT£R SYSIDI l()T D00.1£NTED. CXlERATirE PROCEDURES .r<<JT lJlGRADED. NJ USEAB LE INDEX PROVIDED. 1710 PARAS~ IOIBER: 6.7.1.8.A,1 6.7.1.*&.B SU66£STED 8":KFIT: INITIATE ADMIN. ~TID. OYER ll>6RADIFE IF COi'. SYS. PROC. FOR EASY CP£RATOR ,c:ESS TO FIL ES/ ltFORMTI~.
'** DISPOSITI~:
ASSIGN REPCJSIBILITY FOR MINTAINIFE/LPGRADIN6 COIIIPUTER PROCEDURES*
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE IUIBER:
TP-7.1 COIIJJUTER SYSTEJll REVIEW
~S:
PI-91 ITBIS INYCl.VED: MRI< IUIBER LOCATI~ COlflOf£NT tflllE SYSIDI. SUBSYSTa. DIPTR PROCED ff NJT IN INV FILE t
ttMN OOINEERIPE DISCREPAtt:Y 1:>-..1- '2./27/86 9.JRRY ume CODE ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW t£D NO TITLE RESPO.{:iLi.LlTY STATUS DATE 2NN383 READABILITY IF CRT DISPLAYS t(JT ADEIUlTE. CDIIL.T 87/15/85 tUIAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CJ> RESP!MlE, / Hf PROa..91 DESCRIPTI~: J()T ENX.6H CONTRAST B£TWEEN ~ R I C ~TERS DISPLAYED AND SCREEN ITSELF. 1798 PARA6Ri¥>H OBER: 6.7.2.1.A SOOGESTED BOO<FIT: ADJUST LIJIINAICE m<TRAST PER 1780 6UID£L.INES.
*** DISPOSITION:
DELETE - CONTRAST IS ADJUSTABLE TO ADEII.IATE RATIO. J()T ~ROBL.Elil IHEDATl *
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER:
TP-7,1 COMPUTER SYSTEM REVIEW R91ARKS: PI-92 IIDIS INYCLVED:
~RK N.JliER LOCATI~ C(Jll()ENT till£ SYSIDI SUBSYST91 CRT DISPLAY H t(JT IN INV FILE t
- l£D r<<J TITLE ll.R EhSINEERihS DISC~Y REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE B RESOOIBILITY
'2./27/~
ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28eN3l4 DATA POINT INDICES ARE I~IUHE FOR Cl>ERATOR USE. II -7 95/28/85 IUA4 ER~R: DELAY /ERROR IN CP RESP(HIE. REDOCES IJ> ~T~ If' !DIP UTER SYSIDI, t1-t PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: SPECIFIC CODES/ADDRESSES BY lfiICH DATA DISPS CAN 11£ CALLED IJ) ON CRT BY CPS IUERIC I l()T CROSS-REFERB<<:ED, 1788 PA~RM-1 NJIBER:
- 6. 7.1,8,B.1 6. 7, 1,8.B.2 9.166ESTED BAO<FIT:
PROVIDE CROSS-REFERaCE INDEX BY SYSIDI/SIJBSYSTEJII AND/ORFLWCTIOfA. SROlP NAIi£ TO SUPPlElEN T MJIIERIC CODE Irt>EX
... DISPOSITION:
PROVIDE INDEX REFEREtC£D BY SYSIDI/PARAIETER rfl!E. DURINS P-258 lJl6RADE, ADD MEN U INDEX TO SCFTWARE. DATA c:ru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE ftMBER: TP-7,1 CO/IIPUTER SYSIDI REVIEW IIEMRKS: PI-93. HI ERROR PROB FIDI DELAY IN LOCATihS CORRECT ADD f(), ITEMS INYCl.W>: MRK IOIBER LOCATION !nl>OPENT NAIi£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSIDI DATA PT IND ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t
~ EMiHEERl~ Dl&:IIEPIKY REPORT 12./27/86 9.IRRY llHTI aJDE B ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28881385 PRINTER SPEED TOO SLOW AND BLFFER STORAGE INADEOOATE. EN6 II -7 15/28/85 IUIAN ERflOR:
ERIOII IN IJl AESP(MiE. MAY ~ LOSS If TRENDltE INFO. Hf PROBt.£1f DESCR IPTI~: PRINTERS ARE TOO SLOW TD KEEP LJl WITH roflUTER OOTPUT. BlfFER STORAGE IS INADEIUlTE. IN='OR MATION IS LOST. 1710 PARAS~ N.11'.BER:
- 6. 7. 3.1. D 6. 7. 3.1.E.4 SUBGESTED ~IT:
IIEP!XE/fllDIFY PRHTR SPD TO MIN 300 LIPES/IIIIN. Ir<<:REASE BUFFER STD~ TO STORE/TRANSFER A LL IN=O FRQIII COllllJTER. fff DISPOSITION: IPSRADE ~T IDllUTER SYSTEM Ul'Q.UDIN6 PRINTER>. POTENTIAL TO LOS£ ALARIII IN='OR NATI~ DATA al.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JIIIB£R: TP-7.l COl'PUTER SYSIDI REVIEW REMRl<S1 PI-94 IIDIS INVO..VED: . NARK MJIIIBER LOCATION COfllOfENT PM: SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEJII CQIIIP PRINTER H t()T IN INV -FILE
- ttM 00INEERIN6 DISCREPA.tCY REPORT 92/27/86
- TITLE SURRY 11me CODE 8 28818306 INSTIUTl~ PUITES FOR REL!WlIN6 PRINTER ~R, RI~, Itt< NISSIN RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE (U/30/86 IUIAN ERROR:
RAY ~ LOSS IF TRENDING Irf='O .DUE TO PRINTER IXllfHI~ IIESIL T IN DELAYS/ERRORS IN IP RESPOEE. fff PROBLEN DESCRIPTION: PRINTERS AR£ t<<JT PROVIDED WITH INSTRI.CTION PLATES, lfiICHINSTRI.CT !PS ON KIi TO ll£UR) PAPE R, RI BBC1E, IN<. 1788 PARAS~ tOIBER:
- 6. 7.l. l.E.3 Q.186ESTED BOO<F IT:
PROVIDE INSTROCTlON PLATES ON A.L. PRINTER CASINGS. l+f DISPOSITION: NEW C()IRJTER ~ JEW PRINTERS WITH 6REATER STD~ CAPACITY AR£ TO BE INSTIUED PER PHIi (2M8301),
.DATA COl.1.ECTION DESCRIPTION iwD CODE NJIBER:
TP-7.1 CCN>UTER SYSIDI REVIEW
~lll<Sr PI-95*
IIDIS INYCi.i.tD: flARK JiJMBER LOCATI~ COJOENT rM: svsm, SUBSYSTEM INSTR PL.ATE H MJT IN IPN FILE*
llMH EtEINEERirE DISCREPAtCY REPORT 02./27/86 SURRY OOIT0 CllDE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20180387 PRINTER ~R TAKE-lP SPOOLS ARE flISSil'E. ENG II -7 81/30/86 tt.R ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJ) RESPCHE. (LOSS CF TRENDil'E I~O> lff PRC1!t91 DESCRIPTI~: COf>UTER PRINTERS ARE f(JT PROVIDED WITH TAKE-lP SPOO.S FOR PRINTER PAPER. 9788 PARASRAPH IUIBER:
- 6. 7. 3.1. E. S SLGSESTED MCl<FIT:
PROVIDE PAPER TAKE-lP SPOO..S FOR AU PRINTERS IN CR WITtil ~ITV AT L.£AST EllA. TO THE F EED SlPPLY. fff DISPOSITI~: IP6RADE PROCESS COflUTER UIO.UDil'E PRINTER STAND AND TAKE-IJl). (LOOI< AT lillD DON E AT ~. ) REFER TO PI-9a (28008381) *
.)
DATA al.LECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JIIIEIER: TP-7.1 O)lf)IJTER SYSIDI REVIEW
~Rl<S:
Pl-96 ITENS INVCL 'JED:
~AK IUIBER LOCATION IDflOt£NT ~ SYSTEfl !IJBSYSTEJII TAKE-lP SPLS H f()T IN INV FILE t
tlA EN3INEERifE DISC~Y REPORT 02./27/86
- l£D f() TITLE SURRY PRINT ro>Y f<<IT IUESSill.E TO CPERATORS.
UNITI CXIDE C
~IBILITY ASSESSfENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2IN03l8 ENS III-9 11/38/86
~ ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPOilSE,
*ff PROa.al DESCRIPTIOO:
CPS ~T READ l()ST RECENTLY PRINTED LIIE IF PRINTCIJTS,KIVE PAEVICXJSL.Y COIRAHED ~T PR INTER IS TOO !l.CM. 1710 PARASRMi NJIBER:
- 6. 7.3,l,F,l
!l.166ESTED IW){FIT:
ENSURE PRNTR fllAN.ALY ADJUSTED, EllJIP lllDIFIED SO LAST PRINTED LlrE IF ()l)TR CAN BE READ B y CPS. Hf DISPOSITIOO: lllDIFY ~ TO PROVIDE LirEFD ~ FCUOWI~ CARRIA6 RET, LOW PROB Cf ER ROR F D ~ Llr£FEED CAPABILTY, REFER TO WIPUTER UPGRADE PER PI-91 12010130 1), DATA cru.ECTIOO DESCRIPTIOO AND CODE ftJIBER: TP-7,1 CDPJTER SYSTal REVIEW PI-97 IIDIS INY!l. VED:
~RK MJlll8£R LOCATI~ COl>OrENT NA1E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM COfl) PRINTER H r()T IN INV FILE f
11M EN7INE£RIN3 DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT 82/27/86
- TITLE SURRY ~ITI CODE B RESP0'4SIBILITY ENS ASSESSIENT STATUS II -7 lAiT REVIEW DATE 85/28/85 tlR ERROR:
IIELAY /ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. IIIAY REDlCE i,£RATOR IUEPTAr<<:E 0 F IDl>UTER SYSTEM. fff PROB1.91 DESCRIPTIC*: IPS "'T PROVIDED WITH APOSITIVE INDICATION T~T KEYS ONJJIPUTER KEYDmDS ~ BEEN ACM TED. 1718 PARAGRAPH JUIBER:
- 6. 7, 1,4, F QJ66ESTED BACKF IT:
ENSURE KEYS GIVE POSITIVE INDICATION BY SNAP/FEEL/~ISU: Cl.ID< OR RELEASE OF RESISTAfCE T
..iT KEYS ARE ACT~TED, fff DISPOSITI~:
IJl6RADE PROCESS COJlUTER SYTEJII - INCLUDil'E KEYBOARDS - PROVIDE CRT FOR INIUT ECH 0, FREllENT ERRORS. DATA al.l.ECTION DESCRIPTIC* AND CODE N.MBER: TP-7,1 COIIIPUTER SYSIDI REVIEW AEIIIARKS: PI-98 ITBIS INYO. VED: IIARK NJIIER LOCATION COIIJOfENT NAIi:: . SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM KE~RDS H NJT IN INV FILE t
tlR DEINEERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT t2.127/86
- t£D NO TITLE 28N8311 CJlERATOR/CCNJUTER INTERF~ IS I~TE.
SURRY l.WITI lllDE 8 RESP(JEIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE 85/28/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN [I) RESP06E. *IY REDOCE CP ~TIM:£ Ir= a>>IP UTER SYSTEI\. tH PAOrL91 DESCRIPTI~: IPS IIEPORT DIFFICl.tTY INTERF~IrE W/ Ol>TR (DO r()T IN)EASTAND CM>TR DIil.Dill). 8788 PARAGRAPH MIIBER:
- 6. 7, 1,2.A Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE INTELLIGIBLE so:1WARE PROOmw. FOR CIIPTR SYSTEJII lt!ICH IUOWS OPS TO ID:£SS DPTR US INS COIO YCICAllll..ARY. tff DISPOSITiir.: IP6RADE: PROCESS CCJIPUTER SYSTEJII - IMPROVE CCJIPUTER Dll(.00!£ TO BE IICRE COIRnIBL E WITH CJlERATOR EXPECTATIONS.
- DATA l:tUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIBER:
TP-7.1 CQIIPJTER SYSTEI! REVIEW REMRKSr PI-99 I IDIS INYll.'¥EDI *
~Ill< ltJER LOCATI~ CCJllOfENT fM: svsru S1JBSYST91 CPI~ Dii:l. H r<<JT IN INV FILE t
~ OOHEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/27/86
- t£D NO TITLE SURRY ~ITIJ CODE B RESPB¥.l1BILITY ASSESSfENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28080311 URSENT IESSA6ES ON CRT ARE fill HIQI.I9fTED. ENS II -7 85/28/85 IUIAN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPQICSE. (Ill£ TO IIIISSIN6 llJT-<F-TOLERAfCE CDa>ITICIE. l lff PROBl.al DESCRIPTION: URGENT IESSA6ES CCM:ERHIN6 llJT-oF-TOLERAfa COi>ITIONS r<<JT HIGl.I6HTED ON CRT SCREEN TO A TIMCT ll>S ATTENTION. 1718 PAAASRMi N.NlER: 6.7.2.5.K.1 6.7.2.5.K.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE ADEQUATE HIEH.I8HTIN6 C'JlPABILITIES FOR DISPLAY~ URGENT IESSA6ES ON Tl£ CRT SCREE N. lff DISPOSITION: IP6RADE PUlNT COIPUTER TO HIEH.ISHT CRITIOl. JIESSA6ES*
- DATA CfUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIBER:
TP-7.1 COMPUTER SYSTEII REVIEW REMRl<S: PI-118 ITEMS INYCl.'~D: MRK MJIIIBER LOCATION aNlOr£HT NM: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM H f()T IN INV FILE t
~ ; EN6INEERirE DISCREPAPCY REPORT te./27/66 SURRY ~ITI [llllE B ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESP!l6IBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN312 IURfll IESSA6ES ON PRINT-WTS NJT DISTifOJIQAU FQ 0Tt£R IESSA6 ENS II -6 15/28/85 IUIAN ERROR:
.DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPf>>.5£ <CPS IIIAY IUSS INFO ON llJT-oF-Tll.E Mt(:E COO>ITif>>.S. >
fH PIila.EM DESCRIPTION: IUIRf! IESSAGES 1)4 PRINT-WTS f(JT READILY DISTirG.JISHAIU FRCJI OTIER IESSASES. 171i ~ UBER:
- 6. 7.J.2.D S006ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE ADEIUITE HIEH.I6HTIN6 CAPABILITIES ON CMPTR PRINT-OJTS SO T~T CPS CAN DISTINGUISH BETIEEN IESSAGES. fff DISPO$ITI1l'4: lP6RADE CQlflUTER SYSIDI TO PROVIDE PRIORITIZATION AND ~ T Of" IXJTPUT. POT
- ENTill. TO IIISS fLARIIIS, SEE Pl-98 C2'0N381 >*
DATA CClLECTIOH DESCRIPTif>>. AND CODE M.MBER: TP-7.1 COflUTER SYST91 REVIEW IIEJIU!KS: . PI-181 IT91S llfAL\,{I): WK fOIIER LOCATION COllOfENT tM: SVSIDI SUBSYSTEM ff f(JT IN INV FILE t
ttM ENSINEERIIE DISC~Y REPORT 82/27/&6 SURRY tMITI CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPCJcSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28198313 ~ IESS&S DO JIJT a.EARLY REI.ATE TO Aff<<JCIATOR TILES. II -7 85/28/85 ltJ9I ERRORr DELAY /ERROR IN CJ> RESP!HiE. lff PROll9t D£SCRIPTI[1f: . IIJRDIM:l (F IU~ IESSASES CII CIJll.'UTER PRINT-ooTS DO NlT ~YS RELATE TO A SPfCIFIC IUIJII NITED fN<<Jf;IATOR TILE 17N PARA6R1¥1H NIIBER:
- 6. 7.3.2,F. l 6. 7.3.2.F.2
!USESTED IW:KFIT:
om;E S(FTWARE TO PROVIDE 6IJRDI1E (F Ufflll IESSA6ES THAT CLEARLY RELATE TO 61lRDifE USED 0 N ANUCIATOR ll.ARIIS. Hf DISPOSITICJ4: ST~RDIZE IESSAGES TO BE EASILY CORRELATED TO IMUCIATORS. LOW CONSEIIJOCE DU E TO CPRTING C00>ITIIJ6 tNERWAY DATA COJ.ECTION DESCRIPTIC* ~ CODE NJIBER: TP-7.1 WIPUTER SYSTBI REVIEW IIEJARKS: PI-112 ITEMS INYO..IJED:
~RK fUIER I.OCATICJI Q)ll)(Jt£NT '91£ SYSTEJll SUBSYSTEJII ff NJT IN INV FILE t
tlA Er43INEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT ~/27/86
- 1£1) f() TITLE SURRY. ~IT@ CODE 21188411 TOO MANY P8JU IN CR DURIN6 SHIFT CHS, START-ti>, &TRANSIENTS RESPCWSIBILITY ASSESSIIIENT STATUS aJIPI..T LAST REVIEW DATE 117/11/85 tulAN ERROR:
corFUSICW IN! f()ISE MY CllJSE DELAY/ERROR IN AESPCMiE fff PRREII DESCRIPTIIJ'c: llJTl(IRIZED aJT IOESSENTI~ PERSOf£1. IN CR DURIJE SHIFTCHS, START-ti> &T~IENTS CAUSIN6 DISTRATHN 1718 PA~ fOIBER: 6.1. l. 7
!IJB6£STED ~IT:
INITIATE CONTR(l. OVER ~/IIJV9ENT OF PERSIHEL DURINS ~ ACTIVITY PERIODS,
...,, DISPOSITIIJ'c:
ADflIN PROC IN PUn, CDISIDEA STID6ER ENFOACEIENT, ~SCl.OOI< AT ~INS SI6N/LI6
- HT IN INDICATE -ENTRY RESTRICTED, DATA au.ECTII* DESCRIPTil>>I TP-1, 1 WRKSPAC£ SURVEY
~ CODE NJIBER:
IIEMRKS: PI-6 ITBIS UMl.ml: IWII< fOIIER LOCATil>>I aJllOfENT NAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM H NIT IN INV FIL£ t
ltJAI ENGINEERIIE DISCREPAPCY REPORT 12./27/86
- t£D f()
2Ml5il BEA60CY EOOIMNT f()T IN\9TORIED OR IESTOCKED TITLE SURRY I.WIT& COD£ C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS III-9 LAST REVIEW DATE 11/31/86
~ ERROR:
DELAYS IN AESPCN>IIE TO CPERATIIYR REOOIR9ENTS IN d Tt£ EVEN T IF A CR LtHttA!lTAll.E IDCDITl(JC Hf PftO!l£M 11£SCRIPTIC*: PROTECTIVE Cl.OTHIIE/01ER6 EOOIP NlT AYAil.All.E IN SIZES OR REQJIAED QTYS r££DED, aERSOCY tircJRAl:I: WK ltlWtWIMlt: 17r.!I JJRIH:,'JHIH fl.llUI b, 1, .\, 1, B 6.1, .\, 1. D b.1, .\, .S. R b. 1, .\, .S. B bU:H:l) 11:.D IIU(I- 1 I : PRWJKE. lff:.IIJ!~ 1:WIIJ, INI11All:. AIJIIIIN ~IHl.Uj INtH lNYl:NIUMY JNJ IUllUUl:i Hf U1~l Ill,.: 1:.llll:.Hb1:JCY EUU!Pfl:.NI ll:I ._,IM'IDED IN CR~ IS IrM.NTUHlcV IIJNILY 1.11:.K AUfUN l'tt\Ull Utct, UHTA COLLt~llllN lJt!x;RIPTION AND CODE ~MBe:R: TP-1, 3 EIIER6ENCY EGUI Pl'tENT AEIWIKS: PI-22 ITEMS IN'JCl.VED: NAPJ< NU~R LOCATION ~:1fT ~:i!E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM AIR PACKS ff J<<IT IN INV FILE t au KJRNS ff t<<>T IN INV FILE 1 awEfRLS ff Nll IN lNV FILE t FACE MASKS ff NOT IN INV FILE t
&JIVES ff f()T IN INV FILE t
DISCREPANCY REPORT 11M EN3Ir£EAIJE SURRY lime CODE ASSESSNFNT Ulil Nt.Vltw TITLE RESPONSIBI Ll TY ~lAIUS DAit.
-------~----- ---------
2-e~ IPEAATORS L~ PRACTICE IN DONNING CF PROTECTIVE EQUIPIENT a>>IPI.T 11/17/85 HlM ERROR: DELAY IN RESPONDING TO OP£AATlONA. . REGUIR£~~TS DURING OCR U NINHABITAB~t SITUATlCl\ fff PROl!;..=Y. D~::.CRIP": WN: OPERATORS UNSURE OF ABILITY TO PROPE1LY DON PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 07U PARAGRAPH fUIBER: 6.1.4.1.H Sl.iBGESTED BACKFIT:
- NC:..UDE PAACiICE. lN DON!\lNG PROTECTIVE EQUIPEl£NT IIURININJRM.. TRAINING EXERCISES ff-f DISPOSITION:
OPERATORS ARE RES?ONSIBLE FOR IIIAINTAININS THEIR LEva OFCOMPENTENCV IN THIS AREA
- DATA co~~ECTION DEscqr~:10~ ft\D CODE M.111:BE~:
TP-;.3 E.~ERGENCY EQLlIP~E~; IIDIS IHVO..VE;): MAK to1B£R LOCO..,..ION co.,~JC.~\*.- \ri:r..; svsm, SIJBSY!:iltll TRAINING H hOT IN INV FILE 1
tfJl'IAN ENGINEERING DISC~Y REPORT E/27/86
- H!:.U N'u lllU:
blOOO' llf1 18 aJDE C RESPCIEIB1L1 IY IN!;
~I tilHIUl:i 111~
Util ICl:.YltW IIAlt 11/11/B:> IUIIN E~ROR: DELAYS OR ERRORS IN CPc.ffRIUK ICl:.l:il-ffl:it
*f.4 PROBl..81! Llt!;il;Kl~IION:
OPS HAVE DffFlCLllY WUIOUfti 1N JIHUI tWll', l'Nlll WJIHlftil~iBLOVES INHIBIT IIIYEJIENT/S ISHT 9780 PA~RAPH NJl!B£R: 6.1,4, 1,B SUSG£STED BACXFIT: CHEO</VERIFY ~ y CF EOOIPIENT ANTHR(J)()JETRY AND DOCIJENT I-If DISPOSITION: l<<lD TO REFER TO TRAINING TO INSURE ADEOUATE INSTRLCTIIJt. DATA CCUECTill4 DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIIBER: TP-1,J 9£RSENCY EQUIPIIIENT REJIIARKS: Pl-24 I TOO INY!l.I/ED: RARK NUJIBER LOCATI~ COltPO,,ENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYST91 PROT EQUIP H r()T IN INV FIL£ 1
tl.R ENHNEERitE DISC~ REPORT 12.127/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY IMIT8 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSl'IENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE
~ BIERGaCY EQUIPIENT IS MJT EASILY/READILY ~SSIBLE. C(Jl)LT 17/15/85
~ ERROR:
CPS COllD INCUR PERSOfA. INJURY DUE TO EXPOSURE TO ~ZARIXXJS ENVIRCNEN'Tll. C(Jt)ITI~ IN EVENT OF AN ~RGaCY. Hf PROBl..9! DESCRIPTION: EQUIP l'()T EASILY/R£ADILY 1a£SSIBL£ TO CR OPERATitE PERS(H£L ~ flAtUl. WAY TO !PEN CARDE D OOOR IF DOOR FAILS. 8780 PARAGRAPH tOIBER: 6.1.4.1.6 6.1.4.2.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: EOOIP CR CARDED DOOR WITH MNUA:.. OVERRIDE CAPABILITY. Ht DISPOSITION: DOOR EQUIPPED WITH !'!AN.JAL OPERATED "PANIC BAR"
- DATA COLL.ECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-l.3 EJllERSS~CY EOOIPPIENT RE~RKS: Pl-25 ITEl'IS INVOLVED: Jl!ARI< NU'1BER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAME SYSTEJII SUBSYST91 FIRE £11UIP H N:JT IN INV FIL£ 1 OP PROT £OU! H t<<lT IN INV FILE t RAD EOOIP H MlT IN INV FILE t RESCUE EOOIP ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
KM OOINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY.REPORT 82/27/86*
- HED NO TITLE SURRY 21881183 I.NECESSARY INFORAATION IS DISPLAYED IN CR.
~Il1 CODEC RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS III-9 LAST REVIEW DATE 82/25/85
~ ERROR:
INCREASES PROBABILITY IF CP ERROR HI PROBIDI DESCRIPTION: LNECESSARY INFO IS DISPLAYED IN CR TAKIN6 lP Wl.lJUILE ~ ON Prf-5 IWD ADDING TO VISlR.. CLUTIER IF CR, 1790 PARAGRAPH r<<JMBER: 6.S.1.1.C 6.S.1.1.D SUGGESTED BACKFIT: DETERl'IINE r£CESSITY FOR DISPLAY OF INFO LISTED IN CR Rt4DR9IOYE Ufff:CESSARY DISPLAYS. HI DISPOSITION: REJIIOYE ALL LISTED. COORDil'f!TE WITH PI-68-1 (29A03844l, PI-68-3 (2IA83l4Sl, PI-68
-2 (20A03009l, PI-68-4 ( ~ l
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE N.JP!BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION RE'1ARl<S: PI-107 ITBIS INVOLVED: MRI< NUIIIBER LOCATION COll>Ot£NT ~ SYSTEIII !ilBSYSTEJII
~TAP C/D H NJT IN INV FILE t SW RECCJIIIB H2 ff NOT IN INV FILE t LOAD FREQ PN ff f()T IN INV FILE t LW EVAP CID ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ROD POS IND ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 STIii CHLR C/D ff f(JT IN INV FILE 1
tt.R EPEINEERINB DISCREPANCY REPORT 82/27/86 I
- HED NO 28901114 TITLE INDICATION t(JT LABELLED TO REFLECT 9.JRRY DEMm
~m, CODE A OR ~TlR.. STATUS.
RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 82/25/85 tUIAN ERROR:
.D£LAY/ERROR IN CP RE~.
Hi PROEl.~ DESCRIPTION: OPS REPORT THAT THEY B£C0E ~ AS TO ~1£R EQUIPREFLECTS DEJIRW OR ~TIA. STATUS. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER:
- 6. 5. 1, 1. £. l St.OOESTED BACKFIT:
LABEL ALL INDICATION LISTED TO REFLECT HTHER OF WIAND OR ~TIA.. STATUS. fff DISPOSITION: PL.NT CONI/N. IS il.L CONTR'..LRS AR£ DEMAND-~IZ£ IN TRS
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE !'UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REAARl<S: Pl-i88. I ~ INVOLVED:
"IRK rtJPIBER LOCATION C011PONENT NAlilE SYSTEPI SUBSYSIDI BLOWDOWN ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 DECAY HT REL ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 1£VS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t PRZR SPR W ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 RCS SYSTEJII ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SG FW FLOW ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 STfll DIJPIP ff r<<JT IN IrN FILE f
tUIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 13/17/86 SURRY TITLE -
~IT 0 CODE B 20001106 INDICATill4 NOT LABELLED TO REFLECT DBRID OR ACTIR STATUS.
RESPQNSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 13/17/86 tfM ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.
/
Hf PROB1..91 DESCRIPTI!l4: OPS REPORT THAT THEY BECM COff=USED AS TO HTHER EQUIP REFLECTS DEAD OR ACTUAi.. STATUS. 0700 PARASRAPH NUMBER: f..5.1.1.E.1 Sl.66EST~ BACKFIT: LABEL ALL INDICATION LISTED TO REFLECT WHETHER OF DEMND OR ACru:ll. STATUS. Hf DISPOSITION: LABEL TO INDICATE D8tAND STATUS OF RECORDER*
- DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTill4 iwD CODE UBER:
TP- 9.2 V£RIFICATION ~ w:t.IDATION REAARl<S: PI-108. IT91 INVll.VED: RCS PRZR PRESSURE~TER RECORDER, I~ INVClVED: LOCATION COfiPONENT ~ SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEM 11:S PRZR PR ff NOT IN INV FILE t
~ EN;ItEERirE DISCREPArCY REPORT ic./27/86 SURRY ~ITI CODE A ASSESSIENT UlST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~11"7 INDICATICN NOT LABELLED TO REFLECT DEIAID OR ~TUAI. STATUS. EN6 I -1 ic./25/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN o:> RESPONSE. fff PROBL01 DESCRIPTION: CPS REPORT THAT THEY BECOIE COf=USED AS TO lliETl£R EOOIPIEHT REFLECTS DEJRa> OR ACTLA. STA TUS. 87il0 PARAGRAPH l'O!BER: 6.S.1.1.E.1 SUGGESTED BACKFIT: LABEL ALL INDICATION LISTED TO REFLECT Wl£Tf£R OF DE*lND OR ACTI.A STATUS, JH DISPOSITION: ADD RD/SRN LTS CN BB FOR BKR STATUS (ACTIA.l UNDER RPI
- DATA ro..LECTICN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REAARKS: PI-108 ITEMS INVOLVED:
~RK NUPIBER LOCATICN COIIIPrnENT NAP!£ SYST01 5UBSYST01 RX TRP l OUT ff NOT IN INV FILE*
~ EtEINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 12/27/86 SURRY lime CODE C ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED f() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE -
2111881283 INSTRlJENTATION f()T LOCATED IN PRii.ARY IPERATIN6 AREA. ENS IIHI 12/25/85 tl.R ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJI ~ fff PRO~ DESCRIPTION: CPS REI} TO LEAVE PRIJIIARY OPER AREA TO ATTEND INSTU l>>I OTl£R PAfELS lfiILE ct)4TINDJSLY I(] NITORIMJ ~TRCl.S. 1780 PA~RAPH NJIIIBER:
£.1.1.1.B SUf6ESTED BACKF IT:
INVEST16ATE FEASIBILITY CF INSTALLI~ REDUNDANT INDICATION IN PRIMARY IJIER AREA FOR TI<<)S£ FI RE DETEC PAfEL. Hf DISPOSITION: ADD DISP &~RPI ACl</RESET TO tEW PLA'.IT C(Jl)UTER IN PCR, 'l.SO SEE PI-91 (28M381
)
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE N.IMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND 1/ALIDATION REIIIARKS:
- PI-11114 LO E_RR: ANNS IN !'CR, AVAIL 3RD LIC1<< IN CR TO RESP IIDIS INVOLVED:
1!A RK NlJIIIBER LOCATION COlflOt£NT NAfilE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRE DET PNL H r()T IN IJN FILE 1
- HED NJ TITLE
~
SURRY OOINEERI"6 DISC~Y REPORT UNIT& CODEC RESPONSIBILITY 12./27/86 ASS£SSIIIENT STATUS PASE 59 LAST REVIEW DATE
--- ----~--------------- - - - -
2800128'5 ctMROLS AND ASSOCIATED DISPLAYS ARE f()T LOCATED~ SA,£ PAIEL, III-9 11/11/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN CJ> RESPOOSE. fff PROBIDI DESCRIPTION: RCP FL~ IIITRS LOCATED ()I SECT 2 IF VB & RCP FLCII CTRLS LOCATED CW SECT l IF BB. 0700 PARAGRAPH NLMBER: 6.8.1.1.B Sl.GSESTED BACKFIT: EVALUATE NECESSITY FOR SROUPINS CONTROLS AND 1£TERS ON TH£ SAIIIE PAr£L, AND RELOCATE IF REQ UIRED. fff DISPOSITION: F(J ACTION - RCP FLCII PIETERS ARE CLOSE FOR c.,e:RATQRS TTO SE£ IF THERE IS F Erd6H LOW DURING START UP. I() ACTION. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI(}4 AND VALIDATION R£lllARKS:
- Pl-119
!TOO INVOLVED:
IJIARK MfflBER LOCATION COPIPONENT ~ SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfl! RCP Ai'l~ERS ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 RCP CTR ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RCP FLOW IND ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
IUIAN 00If£ERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT Vlc./2.7186 SURRY ~IT& CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPC>>6IBILITY STATUS DATE 2812.20 ~ROLS AND ASSOCIATED DISPLAYS ARE t<<JT LOCATED !>>4 SAfE M"EL. n -6 11/11/85 tlM ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJ> RE~. Hf PROBl.01 DESCRIPTION: RCP TEJIIP£RATUR£ HOT AND co...D INDICATORS LOCATED ON VERTICAL BOARDS, IDf'TROLS ARE LOCATED 0 N ~RDS. 17il0 PARAGRAPH NJIIBER: 6.8.1.1.B SUSGESTED BACKFIT: EVll.UATE NECESSITY FOR 6RruPIN6 CONTROLS AND IETERS ON THE SAME PM!., AND RELOCATED IF RE QUIRED. . Ht DISPOSITION: RCS WR TEMP CTH &TCl WILL BE AVAILABLE ON SPDS CONPUTER*
- DATA ClllECTION DESCRIPTION ~D CODE N.JIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ YALIDATION 19ARKS: PI-119 ITEMS INVOLVED: fllARK NUl'IBER LOCATION CD!PCJENT ~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM
---- -*--- ------- NJT IN INV FILE RCP TC CNTRL ff t RCP TC IND ff MIT IN INV FILE 1 RCP TH CNTRL ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 'RCP TH IND ff MIT IN INV FILE 1
*~INEERIN6 DISC~V REPORT 82./27/86 111ITI COD£ B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE IIESP(JeIBILITY STATUS DATE . 28901221 CD4TR0LS AND ASSOCIATED DISP'LAYS ARE t<<lT LOCATED~~~. EN6 II -6 11/11/85 H1J1AN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPCN;E.
... PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:
PRZR LVL IND AND PRZR PRESS RCRDRARE LOCATED ON YBS ANDTHEIR ASSOCIATED ~TIIWi AR£ u:r.A TED ON BBS. 1710 PARAGRAPH t(J!llER: 6.8.1.1.B SUSGESTED BACKFIT: EV~~TE rECESSITY FOR 6RO.J>Ir<<3 CONTROLS AND IIETERS ON THE SAfE ~ , ~ RELOCATE IF ffEg UIRED. HI DISPOSITION: ADD RCS WR PRESS TO BB-1 RCS SYS 1-3080 PSIG. FOR PRZR LYL SEE PI-19-8 128Y22487
),
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIB£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REIIIARl<S: Pl-119 ITEMS INVO..VED: IIARK MJIIIBER LOCATION CCJIII.OIJraT NAI£ SYSTEM SUBSYST91 PRZR LVL. CTR ff MJT IN INV FILE 1 PRZR LYL IND ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 PRZR PR CTRL ff l'()T IN INV FILE t PRZR PR RCRD H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
ltM ENiINEERitE DISCREPArCY REPORT 12.127/86
- HED t< RE~. /
fff PROB.91 DESCRIPTION: PRI WTR SUP PPS LOCATED ON DIFFERENT~ T~ ASSOCAITED ~Rel. 8700 PARAGRAPH NI.MBER: 6.8.1.1.B Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT:
!()VE PI.N)S TO BO~ RECOVERY PANEL Ht DISPOSITION:
pt.i,;p SWITCHES TO BE l<<lVED TO 00~ RECOVERY ?ML. SEE PI-19-4 (28.113128) *
- DATA CCUECTION DESCR.IPTION AND CODE PDBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VJ:LIDATION
, R91ARKS:
PI-119
. ITEJIIS INVOL \JED:
MRK NU"8ER LOCATION COflPONENT tAIE: SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM 1-PG-P-lA H NlT IN INV FILE t 1-P6-P-1B H t(JT IN INV FILE t
It.WW EtfiINEERihS DISCREPANCY REPORT 12./27/86 SURRY ~IT8 CODE A.9SESSflENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28001482 VIEWING PArELS FRCJII SRO/SlJlERVISOR STAT!()., mR.T 17/11/85 ttJIIIAN ERROR: CA~T SEE FR!Jf SEATED POSIT!()., IP IIAY IIISS INFO FIDI ~FEC TED PAtELS. fft PRO!UJI DESCRIPTION: TELE STA BLOCl<IN6 SS VIEW Cf' LOWER PNLS ~IT 1 GEN PNI.S, ~IT 2 RX VEssa PRZR PNL, LHSI P PS RECIRC 1S(l. W. 1 ETC 1780 PARAGRAPH !UBER: 6,1,1,3,A 6,1,2.3.A 6.1.3.1.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE TELEPtDE STATION AND CQIIIPUTER IIONITORS TO OBTAIN LNlBSTRUCTED VIEW Of ~ . Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-5HIFT SUPERVISOR IS r<<JT REQUIRED TO OITOR THE PArEL.S FRI)! ASEATED POSI TION. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE ri.JIIIBER: TP-1. 1 li<<JRKSPACE SURVEY TP-2,1 COIIDIJNICATI~ SURVEY TP-9.2 VER1FICATI()4 AND VALIDATI~ REIIARl<S: C-1 ITEJIIS INVOLVED: MRI< IOBER LOCATION COIIPONENT NAIIIE . SYSTEJII SUBSYST£111 SS CONSOLE H NJT IN INV FILE 1
11M a6Ir£ERI"3 DISCREPAll:Y REPORT V/2./27/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY 1.rme CODE RE~IBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 281413 COl!l.WICATIIWS BE1lEEN STA AND.SHIFT SIJlERVISOR. 17/11/85
..._ ERAOR:
COMtdCATicrE WITH !IIIFT SUPERVISOR WILL .Be: DIFFICtLT BECA USE CF UO< CF YISI.A. inm~:T. Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTil>>I: STA KINITORS ARE ll.OCl<IN6 THE STA'S YIStA. TO Tl£ SHIFT su>ERYISOR. 9700 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6, 1, 1,3.B SUGSESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE STA IOITORS IF POSSI!l.E. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-STA IS MlT REllJIRED TO CJlRATE THE LWIT, aw li#LKOYER TO SHIFT SUPERVISOR IF 1£CESSARY, DATA CD.J.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ UBER: TP-1, 1 l<<lRJ<SPACE SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND WUDATION REJ!IARKS: C-2 IIDIS INVn..YED:
~RK l'O!BER LOCATION COIPONENT , - SYSTEII SUBSYSTEII STA STATIONS H NlT IN INV FIL.£ t
IUIW EIEINEERIN6 Dl&:REPA,CY REPORT fl2127/86 Tllli QJRRY time 20881414 SS ID:ESS TO FROOT LIIER PAIE1.S "40 FROOT lJIPER ~S. CODE RESPONSIBILITY IOE ASSESSIENT STATUS CORT LAST REVIEW DATE 17/15/85 tlM ERROR: DIFFICLLT FORSS TO RESPINl TO PROBL.EMS AT FRONT PArEL.S. DIF FICULT FOR OPS TO l()'y'E AROOND comn. AREA. Ht PRO!l.91 DE&:RIPTION:
~LY ACCESS TO STA IS THRU REAR !AWAY F~ F~T PHLS>. CABINET DRAIERS Ii. 00TH ENDS BLOCt<
ia:ESS. 1710 PARAGRAPH NJl'IBER: 6,1,1.3.C,l 6,1,1,3,C.2 6.1.1.6.A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CABil'ETS 1H DISPOSITION: DEL.HE-SHIFT SUPERVISOR DIRECTS RESPONSE RATt£R. T~ DIRECTLY PERFORIIIIN6 ACTI!lE
- DATA COLLECTION DE&:RIPTION AND CODE ftJIIIBER:
TP-1, 1 l<<lRl<SPACE SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION. AND VALIDATION AEJIIARKS: C-3 . IIDIS INVtl. VED: MRK NUJIBER LOCATION COIPC!f£NT ~ SVSTE/4 SUBSYSTEM SS STATION ff NJT IN INV FILE t
IUIAN OOINEERil'E DI&:~Y REPORT 82./27/8,f,
- TITLE SURRY ~IT@ CODE 282896 SCALE R$N3ES AREA INADEIDITE FOR *IINTAINIIE EQUIPNEMT PRIJlERLY, RESPIJSIBILITY ASSESSIENT.
STATUS C(N)LT LAST REVIEW DATE 87/15/85 tlMAN ERROR:
~Y/ERROR IN (P ~ .
fff PROBLal DESCRIPTI~: OPS REQUIRE NR EXPANSI~ ~ SOPE SOUS OR SlfflJRTil'E WRINSTRUENTATION C>>. OTl£R SOUS TD MAINTAIN EQUIP PRCPER 8710 PARAGRAPH fOIBER:
- 6. 5. 1, 2, A 6. 5. l, 2, D, 1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
EVIL rECESSITY FOR EXPANDING NR DR ADDINS SUPPORTING WR FDR ITEPIS LISTED AND PRDVIDE/l(ll)IF YSOUS AS REOOIIIED, 1-1-1 DISPOSITION: CONSOLIDATED WITH PI-71 (28Ae2281/2209/221@/2211/2212/2213/2214/2215/2216/2217/2 218/2219/2228) 1 (SEE REPIARKSl DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIBE:R: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REAARKS: PI-109, DISP:S£E PI-72 (28A02202/22i4/2285/2296/22i7/2288), ITEIE IN\JOlVED: MARK NUIIIBER LOCATION COlf!OpENT NAP!£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM
~s H N'.JT IN INV FILE t
KJIAN OOINEERitE D I ~ REPORT 82/27/86 SURRY ~ne CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2ee828e7 DISPLAYED IA.LIES REllJIRED CJ>ERATOR CDNERSI~. 1G) II -7 82/25/85 IDIAN ERROR: CP ERROR. HI PROBLEJII DESCRIPTICII: CPS ARE REllJIRED TO COWERT VAUES DISPLAYED~ saus TO AMlRE USABI.£ FORM IN ORDER TO u SE IN='O~TION. 8780 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6.5.1.2.B 6.5.1.2,C SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: CH/¥116£ SCIUS TO A .ORE USABI.£ FOllllt. lff DISPOSITION:
- ADD RNS IIARKS ~ DISPLAY 511£ FOR TECH SPEC AND ~ARJII POINTS, AND IMPROVE OIAI .
- TY CF CURVE BOO<S.
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE '°'8£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION AEMRKS: PI-119-1, ITEMS INVOLVED:
#IRK NUIIBER LOCATICII COPIPOr£NT ~ SYSIDI SJBSYSTDI BAST LEva ff NOT IN INV FILE
- CAT LEVEL ff NOT IN INV FILE I CC HEAD TAN< H NOT IN INV FILE
- CST LEVEL ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ECST LEVEL ff NOT IN INV FILE
- EIER CST LVL ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PDIT LEVEL ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PRT LEVEL ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RWST LEVEL ff NOT IN INV FILE
- I ACCl.11'1 LVL ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
- VCT LEVEL ff NOT IN INV FILE
- It.A OOINEERINS DISCREPA;,;. . . ... " . fl2./27/86 282088 TITLE SURRY ~IT0 CODE B DISPLAYED VALLES REGUIRED IJ>ERATDR WNERSION.
R!:aPONSIBILITY r<<lD ASSESSIENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE fl2./25/85 tOIAN ERROR: CP ERROR. / Hf PROBt.£111 DESCRIPTION: CPS ARE REOOIRED TO CONVERT VAL.lES.DISPI.AYED ON SCALES TO Al()RE USABLE FOl!JI IN ORDER TO U SE Il'FO~TION. 1711 PARAGRAPH NL>>IBER: 6,5,1.2.B 6.5.1.2,C SU66£STED BAD<FIT:
~ SCALES TO A l'ORE USABL£ FORA.
Ht DISPOSITION: ENSURE SCALE IIIRKINSS AR£ IN EPIII &THAT PROPER SCU CHART PAPER IS USED *
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Re!ARKS: PI-ll&-2 ITEPIS INVOi..VED: MRK NUl'IBER LOCATION COPIPOf£NT PAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LIQ WSTE FLW H MJT IN INV FILE 1
II.A OOINEERir<<, DISC~Y REPORT .82/27/86 SURRY 1.rme CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESP0'6IBILITY STATUS DATE 20002m DISPLAYS 90I RANDCJil EQUIPMENT VARIATI~. EN6 I -5 82/25/85 llJMAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN (J) RESPONS£. fff PROBL91 DESCRIPTI~: DISPLAYS ARE DIFFICULT TO US£ BECAUSE THEY DISPUlY f()RFIAI.. ~ YARIATIOO IN EGUIMNT P ERFO~. 17e0 PARAGRAPH MJIIBER: 6.S.1.2.F SUSGESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE FILTERS TO REDLCE EQUIMNT f()IS£. ENSURE THAT~ EOOIMNT IS IN PROPtR ADJUST!£ NT. li!t DISPOSITION: ADD NR STEAIII FLfll IETER*
- DATA ro..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION l9AR1<S: Pl-111-2 IIDIS INVO!..VED:
~RI< POIBER LOCATION CO!P01£NT JAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTBI STEAPI FLOW H f()T IN INV FILE 1
~ EN6INEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT 13/17/86
- l£D NO 28002010 ItEORIIIATION REQUIRED TO USE TITLE SURRY ~IT t CODE B saus NOT PRESENT.
RESPCNiIBILITY TRG ASSESSMENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 13/17/86 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR RE~ tff. PROBLEJil DESCRIPTION: ll.l.TIPLIERS/DIVIDERS REQUIRED TO USE Wl.l.ES ON ~SARE NJT LOCATED ON OR ADJ~T TO SC IUS. 8700 PARAGRAPH IOIBER: 6.5.1.2,E SU66ESTED BACt<F IT: LABLE ~S WITH INFORMATION T~T IS NECESSARY TO USE Tl£ Wl.LES DISPLAYED. tff DISPOSITION: IIIPLE~T JPM FOR (PERATORS (),j SETTING !F 1-AJAN CONTROLLERS. CTEN TURN POTS> *
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
T~ 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATICl4 RBIARKS: PI-112 ITEMS INVl:l.VED: LOCATION COIIIPONENT HANE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM
!§AN CNTRL.S H NJT IN INV FILE*
EN3INEERlrE DISCREPAtCY REPORT-ltJlflH ~/27/86 SURRY Ltme CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW t£D NO _TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28082911 DISPUIYS THAT MUST B£ COlf>ARED ~ Il'O)l)ATIBI.E saus. TR6 II -£ 11/38/86 It.A ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN (J) RESP()ISE,
*" PROBl.9! DESCRIPTICti:
ll£N COJIIPARlr<<l DISPLAYS~ ll£ SAIIE PARMTER, ~ DESIGNS AND MJERICSL PROSRESSICN, AR E INCOIC)ATIBI..E. 1780 PARAGRAPH t(JIIBER: 6.5.1.5.D SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: REPLACE SCALES. Ht DISPOSITION: TRAIN OPERATORS IN CORRELATI~ ~ RECORDER CXJTPUT TO INDICATOR OOTPUT*
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ ~IDATION REJIIARKS: Pl-113, WI CONSEQ CF ERROR Dt£ TO AYAIL ~ ~ T l~O. ITEMS INVCLVED: lllARK fUBER LOCATION Cl)IR)fENT ff:IIIIE SYSTEM SJBSYSTEJII PRZR PR REC H NJT IN INV FILE 1
~ ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT . 83/17/86
- 282912 L06ARITif1IC TITLE SURRY ~IT 8 CODE B saus ARE 1.NECESSARY/DIFFIClA.T TO READ.
RESPONSIBILITY TRG ASSES&ENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 83/17/86
~ ERROR:
ERROR IN CP ~ fff PROBLEPI DESCRIPTION: L06ARITff1IC SCALES ARE DIFFia.tT TO READ TO ANY LEVEL IFim.JRACY. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1.5.E Sl.66ESTa) BOO<FIT: . REPl.AC£ LOOARITHMIC SCALES WITH ELECTID4IC DI6ITAL DISPLAYS AND COHVERT RECORDERS IF FEASI ru. Hf DISPOSITI~:
~IZE TRAININ6 ON LOG SCALE READINS*
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTIIJ4 AND CODE NlJIIIBER:
TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP- 5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REPIARKS: PI-114. L06ARITHMIOC SCALES REG DUE TO "'TURE IF PARAIETER ITE~ INVOLVED: ll!ARK NUMBER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAIii£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM H r()T IN INV.FILE f
~ ENHNEERHE DISC~Y REPORT '2./27/86
- HED NO 200e2913 WO ll.RMS TITLE SURRY ltme CODE P<<lT LOCATED AOOVE ASSOCIATED C(J{TR(l..5/DISP\.AVS.
RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS CCJl)LT L,AqT REVIEW DATE 17/15/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESm&:, H* PROBl..a. DESCRIPTI[)j: AtHJrCIATOR ALAR!IIS ASSOCIATED WITH SEM::RATOR AND DIESEL CONTRCLS ARE t(JT ON LOCATED [)I Tl£
~ PAIEl..
178e PARAGRAPH M.IMBER: 6.3.3.l.A 6.3.J.3.B SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: f()VE ANM.N:IATOR ILARlilS TO Tl£~ MELS AS ASSOCIAT~TRCI..S AND DISPLAYS. DISPOSITION: DELETE - OPS ~'T Dlis<<lSE PROB/TAKE CORRECTIVE ~TIMROPI CR. lllST CALL L~ IP FOR THIS. THEREFORE, (RIIIRKSJ DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE N.MBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION TP-3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REJIIARl<S: PI-116. DISP: IOLlD rtJT t£LP TO 14WE Al.RPI ABOVE SEN PN.. IIDIS INVll.lJED: flARI< NI.JJIBER LOCATI~ CO!POr£NT NAIii£ SVSIDI SUBSVSTa. SEN CTRLS H rtJT IN INV FILE f
~ OOINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 92./27/86
- HED NJ TITLE SURRY ~ne CODE A RESPCJEIBILITY A$ES9£NT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28982818 DISPUIYED Wl.lES REQUIRE IJ>ERATOR ~RSION. EN6 II -5 11/11/85 11.M ERROR:
CP ERROR. ./ Ht PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: CPS ARE REQUIRED TO CONVERT YAl..lES DISPLAYED ON SCILES TO A.l(IRE USABLE FORM JN ORDER TO U SE Jt.fom.ATI(l(. 1710 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6.S.1.2.B 6.5.1.2.c SU66ESTED BACKF IT:
~ SCALES TO Al(IRE USABLE FORJII.
fH DISPOSITION: INSTALL METER FOR TOT~ AFW Fl.Ill (0-1500 6PM) AND PER PI-19-tS (28Ae3804) ADD IE TER FOR. TOT~ BYPASS FW FLOW (0-2888 SPlill
- DATA COL.1.ECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE rtJIIIBER: .
TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~Rl<S:
PI-118-4. ITEJIIS INVO...VED: MRI< NJJIBER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NA1E SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII AFW FLOW ff f()T IN INY FIL.£ t TOTAL FW FLW ff NJT IN INV FILE 1
.. ~ EN>INEERI~ DISC~ REPORT tl./27/86
- HED NO TITLE
?:HRY 20082919 DISPLqYED Vil.LIES REQUIRE CJIERATOR cnNERSION.
ltHT8 CODE C RESPOeIBILITY ASSESSfENT STATUS III-9 LAST REVIEW DATE 82/25/85 llM ERROR: (P ERROR. f*f PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: CPS AR£ REQUIRED TO COWERT VALLES DISPLqYED ON SCIU:S TO A !(IRE USABLE FORM IN ORDER TO U SE Irt=ORMATION. 1701 PARAGRAPH M.JMBER: 6.5.1.2.B 6.5.1.2.C . SU66£STED BACKF IT:
~ sm.£5 TO A !'ORE USABLE FORPI. ... DISPOSITION:
CHANGE S(A£ TO READ IN PSIA - ll(JVE 1£TER ~ fEXT TO OHER A EVAP 1£TERS. SEE PI-19-4 (20.113020)
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJMBE:R:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION
~RKS:
PI-lle-3. ITEJII INVOLVED: BORON EVAP A IID!S INVCl.VED:
~RK NUPIBER LOCATION CIJIPOt£NT NAME SYSTEJII 9.JBSYSTEJII PI-BR-109A '"873 IETER a:JRON RECOVERY SYSTEJII
KM ENJINEERI~ DISCREMC REPORT 82./27/86 9.JRRY ltme CODE C ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED N'.l TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 282820 DISPUIYS StOI RANDO! EQUIPMENT UARIATI~. 111-9 11/38/86 II.A ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP AESP0.'8£. ffl PROBLEJi1 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS ARE DIFFICll.T TO USE BmUlE THEY DISPLAY N'.llMll. RAHlXM VARIATION IN EOOIPl£NT PE RFONCE. 171e PA~RAPH l'iJIIIBER: 6.5,1.2,F Sl.166ESTED BSO<FIT: PROVIDE: FILTERS TO REDlCE EOOIP1£NT NJISE. ENSURE MT IU EOOIPfiENT IS IN PfHPER ADJUSTIII ENT. ffl D'lSPOSITI~: OCP ~ BEEN INPLEMENTED TO CORRECT LP,! t()!SE PROBL01*
- DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE 0££R:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION REJIIARKS: PI-111-7 ITEMS INVCLVED:
!ARK tOIBER LOCATION COJ1lOt£NT ttlE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LOSE PTS D H N'.JT IN INV FILE 1
~ OOINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT
- HED P() TITLE SURRY
~ 1 ItEORMATI~ REQUIRED TO USE sau5 J()T PRESENT.
1.1ma CODE B RESPIJeIBILITY ENS ASSESSIENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE 12/25/85 ttM ERROR: IIEUlY/ERIIOR IN CJ) RESPCNlE. Hf PR08L9I DESCRIPTI~: PDT LEVEL INDICATOR sm.ES 00 J()1 MTCH. uae PARAGRAPH OBER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. E S006ESTED BACKFIT:
LABa SCAl-£S WITH INFORMTI~ THAT IS r£CESSARY TO US£ THE WUES DISPLAYED, DISPOSITION: CCINDOCT I&C STUDY TO DETER1i1Ir£ RE!lJIRED SC~. COORDINATE WITH PI-19-4 (28Jl312
- 8) *
- DATA al.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE "'"8£R:
'TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND Vfi.IDATI~
REMRKS: PI-113, LOW CONSEOOEtCE Cf ERROR DU£ TO ~TO PUfllPS & ILARMS. IIDCS INVO...VED: MRK IUIBER LOCATION C()IP()NENT NAIE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM LI-BR-la@ r<<069 IETER BOIOI RECOVERY SYSTEIII LI-BR-115 NAAe68 IETER ~ RECOVERY SYSTEII
~ EttiIN£ERI"6 DISCREPArCY REPORT VJ2./27/Pi, SURRY . trma CODE A ASSES9£NT LAST REVIEW H£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 281i2121 NO DISTil'CTIYE CODINS FOR EXTENDED DURATION ILLIJUN DURINS NOR!II IP ENS II -5 17/11/85
.._ ERROR:
~ y/ERROR IN IP RESP{)4SE.
Hf
- PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION:
~ TILES 00 NOT KWE DISTil'CITIYE CODING FOR r<<l~ IP. IP r.Arf(IT DIST1t6JISH NlRIIA... FR
[)I BIERGENCY COO> ITIIJ4 1710 PA~RAPH NJIIIBER: 6.3.3.2.F.1 SUGGESTED BACl<FIT: ESTABLISH ADMIN CONTROLLED WAY IF CODirE OR fllARKINS OF TILES 6fiIDi ARE TO BE ILLIJIINATED F OR EXTENDED DURATJ()t. Ht DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-85 !2eA02106) AND PI-2 (28A821Bll INOCIATOR STUDY*
- DATA CO...LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NlJIBER:
TP-3.1 Atf{INICIATOR SYSTENS REVIEW REJl!ARKS: C-11 ITEMS INY!l.YED: fllARK NmBER ~TION COlflOr£NT fM: SYSTEM SUBSYST91 ANO SYST91 H NlT IN INY FILE t
l i
~ OOINEERiriJ DISC:~Y REPORT t2.127/86
- HED NO 29802121 r<<l IIEFLASH CAPABILITY ~
TITLE SURRY ~IT8 CODE A A'ft.lfCIATOR SYSTEJII RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASS£S9ENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 87/11/85 It.A ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE. Hf PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: cnPtlt£NTS WITH ~RED ~!ATOR TILES CAIHlT REFLASH LIT TILE li.TIL PAEVIClJS ItCJIIIIriJ A LAJ!IIIS HAS BEEN CLEARED 1780 PA~RAPH NJIBER: 6.3.1.2,C.3 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: INSTALL REFLASH CAPABILTIES OR INDIVIWl. TILES TO EACH C()IIM:)(JNENT R..READY ON flJLTI-IN>UT A rto(;IATOR TILES. Ht DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-85 (28Ae2186l ~ PI-2 (2:8A0211Ul ANNJNCIATOR STUDY*
- DATA CD..LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-3.l ArftJNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW RBIARKS: C-18 IIDIS INVCl.VED: MRK fOBER LOCATION COll>OrENT ~ SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEfll
~ SYSTEM ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
II.A EN6INEERI"6 DISC~Y REPORT 82/27/86
- TITLE SURRY ~IT@ CODE A RESPC>>,SIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 282122 ~ TILE DOES t<<:JT BURN STEADILY ..a TI£RE IS FLASHER FAILURE. EN6 II -5 17/11/85 tUIAN ERROR:
IP ()M()T RE~ TO ll.AR,I SITUITION. 1 Hf PRO~ DESCRIPTION: . 1M TILE LT DOE~T ILLUPIINATE & aJRN STEADILY lliEN FLASl£R FAILURE. CAUSil'E INABILITY TO D ETERPIINE TILE BURN OUT 1780 PARAGRAPH UIBER: 6.3.3.2.D SU66ESTED BAD<F IT: INST/ti~ WITH CAPABILITY TO ILLIJIIIINATE ~ aJRN STEADILY lffN TILE IN t£ED OF REPAIR Ht DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-85 (~106) ~ PI-2 (28A82llll ArftMIATOR STUDY *
- DATA COJ.ECTICN DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE OBER:
TP-3.l ANl<<JIICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REl¥lRKS: C-19 ITEMS INVCl.VED:
~RK IOBER LOCATION COIIIPOf£NT NAIIIE: SYSTEM SUBSYST01 IMtJN SYST01 H NlT IN IPN FILE 1
tt.R 06IN£ERIIE DI&'CREPAM'.:Y REPORT '2/27/86
- HED t<<l 20002237 Il<<:ORRECT YERTICll. IETER SCALE TITLE SURRY ~Inl CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS IIHI LAST REVIEW DATE 17/11/85 IUIAN ERROR:
~LAYED/UO< OF OPERATOR RE~ UCORECT OPERATOR RESP!:N1 E.
1H PROBI.DI DE&'CRIPTICIN: VERTICAL. IETERS ~ Ir<<:ORRECT SOUS, (u.! ~ VB SECT 1-2 IWD SIIUATOR,) (v.1$ ~ VB SECT 31 171!0 PARAS~ l'UIIIBER:
- 6. 5. l. l. B 6. 5. 1. 5. D SU93ESTED .BACKF IT:
ENSURE CORRECT lfTR SDUS INSTIU£D, StO..tD BE SAIIIE AS SC$LES ~ VflS LABEL£D t<<lT LES tfiSI LitE FLOW LOCP A & C. 1H DISPOSITil),r: SUBP1IT NlINT~ RE!l.lEST TO CORRECT saus AS PER .BACKFIT *
- DATA CO..LECTI~ DE&'CRIPTll),r AND CODE NJl££R:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RENlRl<S: DS-31-1 ITEMS INVCl.VED: lflRK N>>IBER LOCATION co,Jl()f,£Nl PIK SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FI-1--968 ff r(JT IN INV FILE 1
06IPIEERI"3 DISCREPArCY REPORT f/2./27/86 t<<.W,Vj SURRY ~ITI CODEC ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW l£D f(J . TITLE RESP{N;IBILITY STATUS DATE 21002238 It<<:ORRECT 1/ERTIDl. IETER sal.E. III-8 87/11/85 11M ERROR: ll£1JlYED/~ CF [l)ERATOR RESP0NS£. HOJRRECT [l)ERATQR RESPON SE. lff PROIUJII DESCRIPTION: 1/ERTI~ 1£TERS ~ IN:ORRECT SCSUS. (UiSI PP FUlW: FI-2-945 I FI-2-946) 87N PARASRl¥>H NIJIIBER: 6.5.1.1.B 6.5.1,5.D Sl.66ESTED BAC!{FIT: ENSURE VIIIS FOR 1.14IT 2 LHSI PP FL~ IFl-2-945 AND PI-2-946) ~TCl£S llillT 1 LHSI PP FLOW JIIET ER SOUS. lff DISPOSITIOH: SUBl'IIT ~INT~ REll.lEST TO CORRECT SCIUS ~ PER .BACKFIT *
- DATA CO..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIUER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RBIARKS: DS-31-2 ITOO INVO..VED: MRK NUMBER LOCATION fDllOtENT ~ SYSTal SUBSYSTal Fl-2-945 ~ METER !WETY INJECTION SYSTal PRESSURIZER FI-2-946 ~ METER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD
~ EM;INE£RirE DlSCREPIM:Y REPORT 12./27/1*,
SURRY ~IT0 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED t¥J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 290e2239 UCORRECT YERTICR. EER sal.E. NlD III-8 87/11/85
~ ERROR:
DELAYED/ HCORRECT /UO< Cf' CPERATOR RESPO\'SE. fff PROBLBI DESCRIPTION: YERTICR. IETERS ~ INCORRECT sal.ES. (PRZR PRESS CONT IUERS CH I). 1700 PARAGRAPH MJIBER: 6.5.1.1.B 6.5.1.5.D Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE CORRECT IIITR saus INSTIUED. fff DISPOSITION: PRZR PRESS CONT PI-1-444 CHI CU-1> AND PI-2-444 (LJ-2) SH{ll] IIIATCH*
- DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2. VERIFICATION AND WLIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REPIAR!<S: . DS-31-3 IIDIS INYO..YED: MRI< rtmBER LOCATION Co,fl()f£NT ~ SYSTEM 9.JBSYSTEM PI-1-4'+'t H r<<JT IN INV FILE t PI-2-444 PAA318 IETER Rm:TOR COOI.JINT (PRIMRY l.OOl, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER
tiM ENJIIEERIN3 DISCRmN:Y REPORT te./27/86 SURRY UNITi CODEC ASSESS1ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESP(JrEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28812241 It<<:ORRECT VERTICR.. IETER 5aU. NlD III-8 17/11/85 IUIAN ERROR: IB.AY/ERAOR/Lro< IF CPERATOR REWEE.
*'" PIIOILal DESCRIPTION:
VERTICR.. METERS ~ IN:ORRECT saus. Slll HDR PRESS IHRS Pl-( >-468/466/464A DO NJT IIATDi 1718 PARAGRAPH N.JMBER: 6.5.1,1,B 6.5,1.5,D SU66ESTED BAD<F IT: ENSURE CORRECT flTR SCIUS IHSTIUED. ff* DISPOSITION: ENSURE CORRECT MTR SCIUS INSTIUED: DAE£ TO 01 289,408,608, 88'!11 UW, 121ll IN lN
- IT 1 AND ~IT 2*
DATA cru.ECTic>>I DESCRIPTION AND CODE rtJ1118£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION 114D ~IDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY Ra!Afl(S: DS-31-4. ITEJIIS Il'Ml.YED:
!!ARI< rul!EA LOCATic>>I COIPMNT ~ SYSTEJII SUBSYST91 PI-1-464A ff NJT IN INV FILE t Pl-1-466 ff l<<>T IN INV FILE 1 PI-1-468 ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 PI-2-464A ff l'(JT IN INV FILE 1 PI-2-466 ff NJT IN I~ FILE t PI-2-468 ff r<<JT IN :,,:; F-ILE 1
~ ENSINEERINS DISCREPAJCY REPORT 82/27/86 SURRY UNIT8 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCl6IBILITY STATUS DATE 21183815 COOID.S DO NJT PROVIDE LEVEL IF PRECISION REQUIRED. EN6 I -5 85/82/85 tl.JllN ERIIJA:
DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPCNSE. Hf PROa.91 leCAIPTION: IPS CArHJT REGl.l.ATE/ADJUST COHTA(LS FOR EOOIPIENT TO THE LEI/EL IF PRECISION REllJIRED. 0798 PARAGRAPH UBER:
- 6. 9. 3. 2.. A 6. 9. 3. 2, B SUEESTED 8":KFIT:
EWLUATE CIRCUITS AND IIODIFY AS REQUIRED. Hf DISPOSITION: EWA~ BEEN ISSLED TO CORRECT*
- DATA c:w.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE IUIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: Pl-115-5 ITEMS Il'Ml.VED: JIIAAK rumER LOCATION COflONENT 1M SYSIDI
.OOA ~ CTR H NJT IN INV FILE 1
- l£D It) TITLE ttM 9'INEERIN6 DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY I.NIT@ CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 82./27/fk, ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 21183116 CTRI.S ~T IIJST BE OPERATED snu.TirEWSLYLOCATED TOO FAR APART. ENG II -6 05/03/85 tU9I ERROR: /
DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESP()EE. fff PROll.8! DESCRIPTI~: CPS REPORT MT THEY LOSE TROCK ~ SETIIN6S/READiftiS lliILE WALKirE BETWEEN POINTS. 07N PARAGRAPH ~R:
- 6. 8. 3.1, C Sl.¥36ESTED BACKFIT:
~ NEC£SS1TY FOR LOCATINS CTRLS CLOSER &RELOCATE IF r£C£SSARY. ADD ~ T CTR!. FORE I1l£R FIKTI~
DISPOSITION: REDSI6N AUX VENT PANEL - C01f:i0l..IDATE ILL COMlN EQUIP~ Sil'G.E BOARD &PROVIDE
,muc.
DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTION~ CODE NIJIBER: TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ ~ ~IDATION TP-4. l CONTROLS SURVEY ffBIIA!f(S: PI-117. !SEE PI-19 122F23826>. IIDIS INYCl.YED:
~RI< fUIBER LOCATION COIOENT t9IE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM DE~ BUl6 H r<<JT IN INY FILE t
tlJAf ENSINEERING DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/27/Bf:, SURRY UNITI CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tel3817 C(MR(L SWITCH umm IS ItCONSISTENT ENS I -2 17/15/85 ttJllN ERROR: ERROR IN CJ> RESPCN,E. fff PROILEJII DESCRIPTI~: IDlJIUATOR WSW LAYClJT IS INCllEISTENT WITHIN PAM:I.. 6ACXJ>Ifli. 1798 ~ OBER: 6.8.2.3.A S006ESTED BACKFIT: REWIRE ~ RELABEL ~VE SWITCHES.
+-1-1 DISPOSITION:
REFER TO PI-19 (201/13022>. REARRAM3E AND RELAB£L
- DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION RBiARKS: PI-118 ITalS INIJ(l.lJED:
~RK OBER LOCATI~ COIR>>ENT NAIE SYSTEJII SUBSVSTEJII ~ TEST H M'.lT IN INV FILE t
tlM EhGINEERIIE DISCREPArCY REPORT VJ2./27/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28884211 TRANSFER IF I~ORMTIIII DURIIE SHIFT Dw.sE t<<:IT ADE~TE. CCMPLT 17/15/85 ttR ERROR: D£LAY/ERROR IN IP RE~. Ht PROa.91 DESCRIPTIIII: EQUIP STATUS LOO IS t<<:IT ll.WAYS ~RATE AND CPS SOll£TIIES ,uss I/ERR. REPORTS. STATUS LOO IS IN ADEQUATE. 8780 PA~RAPH romER: 6:1.1.2.A SU66£STED BAD<F IT: 6EIERATE ADIIIN PROC !XJTLINI"6 RE~IBILITY/IIETHOD Of TRANSFERRI"6 EOOIP STATUS INFO FRI)! SHIFT TO SHIFT. fl-f DISPOSITIIJI: EXISTING ADfllIN PROCEDURE IS ~TE - ffN FOLL.OWED PRCPERLY* DATA Clll.ECTIIII DESCRIPTIIII AND CODE UBER: TH.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
~RKS:
PI-88 ITEMS INVCl.VED:
~Rt< tUIBER LOCATIIJI Cl)fl{lliOT FM SYSIDI SUBSYST01 STATtS LOO H NIT IN INV FILE f I
ltJAj Eh6INEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY RfPCJRT 02/27/86 SURRY Ltml . co~ A$ESSll£NT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RE5m4S1BILITY STATUS DATE 28AN111 Flll VIEW IF PAr£1.S NOT POSSIBLE FRO! DESl<S AND CCNnES CCNll.T 17/11/85
~ ERROR:
FAIL TO RE~ TO DISPLAYS 1H PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: l))ERATORS AND SHIFT StJ1£RVISORS 00 NJT ~ All VIEW IFClWTRCl.S AND DISP\.AYS FIOI THE DES KS AND CO'm.ES 178e PARAGRAPH rtJIIIEA: 6.1.1.3.A SU66STED BACKF IT: DETERMINE REQUIRED VIEWING AA£AS OF BOARD AND RE-ro5ITION DESKS AND CONSOLES ACCORDINGLY fH DISPOSITION: SS:DaETE SS NJT REOOIRED TO OITOR FROII SEATED POSTN <SEE C-112Nl1482l,
~
!P/()l)TR: T~ CARE .IF IN !RMl<l DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.Jf!BER:
TP-1. 1 l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY AEM~S1 PI-1 DISP: P-258 lJl6RADE. !SEE PI -91 !21818311>
- ITEMS Il'NCX.'-El:
NARK fUIBEA LOCATION C(Jll(J£NT rM svsm SUBSYSTEM ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t
~ EMiINEERINS DISCREPAN'.:Y REPORT 'il2/27/86 SURRY ~ITI CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t< ~ B£TWEEN BBS IN BETWEEN B8S IWD VBS - MJORTRIP ~ZARO.
07N PARAGRAPH ~R: 6.1.1.J.C.1 StmSTED IIACKFIT: REJIOVE RIM> AN> INSTIU CABLES B8£ATH THE FLOOR. 1H DISPOSITION: INVESTIGATE FEASIBILITY IF AELOCATINS CAU:*
- DATA CCl.LECTIOO DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE IOIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND W:...IDATIDN TP-1.1 l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY REMARKS: E-22 IIDIS INVCl.'.£D:
~RK tUIIER LOCATIC* a>>mENT NAIi£ SYST9' SUBSYST9' CR ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
- TITLE ttM OOINEERHE DISCREJ>At£Y REPORT SURRY UNITi CODE RESPONSIBILITY 82/27/86 ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28AN115 INADEMTE StJlPLY CF EXPENDA9-ES AND UO CF CODING. ct>>llt..T 17/15/85 tUIAN ERROR:
INABILITY TO PIAINTAIN CR EQUIPMENT. fff PROaal DESCRIPTION: E X ~ SUPPLY IS INADE~TE AND l(lT CLEARLY LABELED/CODED, VN PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER: 6.1.1.5.A SOOGESTED BOCXFIT: PROVIDE ADE~TE SUPPLY IF EXPENDABLES WITH ~ROPRIATE L.AB8.IN6/C0DIN6. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE - SEE PI-38 (28080189)
- DATA C(UECTICJ't DESCRIPTICJ't AND CODE NJIBER:
TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATICIH TP-1.7 PIAINTAIIWU!ILITY SURVEY REMA Rl<S: E-48 ITEMS INVCl.\e: IIARK l'UIBER LOCATION a>>IPClENT rAE SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll IU.BS ff l<<JT IN INV FILE* PAPER ff r<<lT IN INV FILE* PRHTR RIBD ff r()T IN INV FILE*
82./27/86 SURRY LWI11 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28AN213 LAD( CF PERIODIC MAINTENAM:E TESTS - CCJIUHCATIIH, ENG II -7 11/31/86 11M ERROR: , CCJIIOICATICJI ERRORS - LOST OR GARSLEI)" ~ fff PROILal DESCRIPTION: IP REPORTS T~T COM.IHCATICWS SYSTEMS ARE f()T RE6ll.ARLY TESTED TO ENSURE IIA.ITY. 8781 PARAGIRIH to!BER: 6.2.1.1.B SOOGESTED BACKFIT: ESTABLISH PROC£DURES FOR PERIODIC COMJNICATION SYSTEfllS TESTS. fff DISPOSITION: PREVENTIVE MAINTErfM:E TESTINS SIO.LD BE PERFORIED. REFER Tll>I-45 (20881287> *
- DATA Cll.LECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIIBER:
TP-1.7 MAINTAI'4UIILITY SURVEY REMARKS: E-42 ITENS Il'Ml.VED: MARK fiJIIB£R LOCATION COIPOM:NT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII COMJNIC SYS H f()T IN INV FILE 1
- HED I'll TITLE It.A EN6INERIN6 DISCAEPAtCY R£PORT SURRY UNIT& CODE B .
RESPOOSIBILITY 02/27/Sh ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST. REVIEW
- DATE 28AN314 UICI( IF aJllUTER ACKtOl.ED6E FOR CPERATOR DATA ENTRY. EN6 II -7 to/17/85 tUDf ERROR:
CPERATOR CAN INADVERTENTLY OR INCORRECTLY CHIN£ COIRJTER AL ARM SETPOINT. fH PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: cmPUTER 00£S' t(IT ~ OR REQUEST VERIFICATION HN OPERATOR ENTERS DD&: (E. 6., C HAN6E IN SETPOINT.l 1780 PARAGRAPH r<<>>!BER1 6.7.1.1,D SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IODIFY SOFTWARE TO RE!XJEST VERIFICATION FR(JII ~RATOR.
.... DISPOSITION:
IJ)GRAilE PROCESS aJIIPUTER. SEE PI-91 ( ~ l l DATA CO-LECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-7.1 COIIIPUTER SYSIDI REVIEW REJIIARKS: E-2. ITENS INV(L~: MAK POIBER LOCATIOH CQIIRlfENT NAfE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII ff NJT IN IIW FILE *
- t£D I() TITLE IOIAH EftJINEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY tMIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY W27/86 ASSESSfiEHT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A09315 ILLOOICA Cl>ERATOR-<lJlllJTER DHl.lXil.E, ENS II -7 ~/17/85 IUIAN ERROR:
DELAYS IN ENTERIN6/RETREIVlN6 DATA. ft-I PROILER DESCRIPTION: COflP DI~OOl£ l()T EFFICIENT:~ IS BY ADDRESS, t()T PA~R/C()!l)()£NT; I() PIDPTINS; I() ED ITHE CAPABILITY. 17N PARAGRAPH rtJIIIBER: 6.7,1.2.A 6.7.1,3,A 6.7.1.3.B 6.7,1.3,D S006ESTED ~IT: IIODIFY SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE flORE EFFICIENT DI~CB.JE. tt-1 DISPOSITION:
!JlSRADE PROCESS COIIPlJTER. SEE PI-;98 (2Ml0381)
- DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: .
TP-7.1 CQIIIPUTER SYSTEM REVIEW
~~S:
E-3. ITENS INW..l,{I):
~AK ru!BER LOCATI~ COllOfENT ~ SYSIDI 9.JBSYSTEJII ff l()T IN INV FILE* /
llNlN Etf:llNEEAlrti DISCREPAtCY REPORT W27/S6 SURRY lJHTB CODE 8 ASSESSIENT ~T REVIEW TITLE RESmEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28AN316 Ill>RIJIER KEYOIRD SI..CPE. ENS II -7 V/6/07/85
..... ERROR:
DATA ENTRY ERRORS. fff PROBt.91 DESCRIPTICJI:
~RD DOES NJT CCM=ORIII TO SOOGESTED SLIP£ !15 DSREE -25 DEGREES FRI)! t()RIZONT~. >
0701 PARAGRAPH l'UIBER:
- 6. 7.1.~.6 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE KEYBOORD WITH RECOPflENDED SLCPE. fff DISPOSITION: lPSRADE PROCESS WflUTER. S£E Pl-90 ( ~ l l *
- DATA CCllECTIOO DESCRIPTIOO AND CODE NUIBER:
TP-7.1 CQIIIPUTER SYSTE/11 REVIEW
~S:
E-5 IIDIS INVCl.l,{l): IA!a< NJIIIBER l.OCATIOO IDIP()OT , - SYSTEJI SUBSYSTEM ff t<<JT IN IW FILE t
- TITLE lt..R EN6INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ifi./27/86 ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 29AN317 NO YIStR. FEEDEKI< lffN ENTERil'E DATA. ENG II -7 V/6/97/85 llWlN ERROR:
DELAY IN REC06NIZil'E DATA ENTRY ERROR. fff PROaal DESCRIPTION: CCJP IXESN'T DISPLAY DATA AS THEY ARE KEYED IN - t<<DS TH91 IN BUFFER, Tl£N DISPLAYS THal lffN ENTRY IS COIC>LETE 1798 PARAGRAPH rtJIIIBER: 6.7.1,4,H SU66ESTED BACKF IT: JIIJDIFY SOFTWARE TO DISPLAY DATA AS Tl£Y AR£ ENTERED. DISPOSITI~: fff IJJ6RADE PROCESS C(JIPUTER, SEE PI-98 (29N9Jll), DATA co.J.ECTICW DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE l'UIBER: TP-7.1 COIIIPUTER SYSTE/11 REVIEW REIW1<S: E-fl. ITEMS INVCL'.e>:
!ARK fUIBER LOCATION CO!P()ENT NAflE SYST91 SUBSYSTEM BC RESET/LO ff l'(JT IN INV FILE 1 PROCESS CDI> ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
- ~
SURRY EN6IN£ERirE DISCREPIKY REPORT UNITla CODE B 82/27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPC>>eIBILITY STATUS DATE
~ 1 8 LACK IF ERROR PAOTECTIIJI. ENG II -7 V/6/U/85 tUIAN ERROR: /
LOSS IF Itf=ORMTI~ IF COOITER LOCKS UPS. 1.HWAILABILITY CF C()l)IJTER. Hf PAOBLEJII DESCRIPTIIJI: IP REll.ESTS CAN OVERUm CIMl & CAUSE L00<-1.P fllAl<IN6 BOOTSTR$¥l rECESSARY. <DURirE OBSERV, IP lHUl.E TO OVERRIDE> 1708 PARASRM-1 NJIIIBER:
- 6. 7.1.2.D SU66ESTED BACKF IT:
EXPAND COit> CAPABILITY TO HANDLE EXPECTED APPLICATIONS (E. S., SRoo:> REVIEW!. PROVIDE OP 0V ERRIDE CAPABILITY. DISPCISITI~: fff I.PSRADE PROCESS COPIPUTER. SEE PI-91 (2e088381}
- DATA cru.ECTIIJI DESCRIPTIIJI AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-7.1 a>>IPUTER SYSTBII REVIEW REJIIARKS: E-7 I TEfllS I NW. '.JED: JIARK NJfllBEfl L.OCATillf cnl>ONENT ~ SYSTBII SIJBSYSTEfl CNlff PflP CTS ff r(IT IN INV FILE 1 PCS VENT ISO ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 PROCESS ClJIP ff t<<lT IN IW FILE 1
- TITLE tlJIAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPArCV REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RESP(J4SI8ILITY 02./27/~
ASSES&IENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 29AN319 LACK (f' DECIIR. POINT LirElP: EN6 II -1 . V/6/87/65 tUAil ERROR: READIN6 ERRORS. lff PAOBL£M DESCRIPTI~: IUERIC IXJTPUT IS r()T ll.ISNED BV DECIIR. POINT, 8781 PARAGRAPH MJIBER: 6.7.2.4.J Sl.66ESTED BACl(fIT: lilCIDIFY SOFTWARE TO I\.ISN DECI~ POINTS. lff DISPOSITION: lPSRADE PROCESS CQIIPUTER. SEE Pl-90 (2'1000301), DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTICN AND CODE NI.JIBER: TP-7,1 COOJTER SYSTEM REVIEW
~S:
E-8. ITEJIIS INYCl.VED: NARK rtJIIIB£R LOCATI~ COIP()ENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CONTRCLS ff f()T IN lffJ FILE
- FIRE PROT .PN ff t<<JT IN IffJ FILE*
PROCESS COi) ff r()T IN INY FILE*
- TITLE ltJfAj SURRY OOINEEAIN6 DISCIIEPAN'.:Y REPORT UNITI CODE B RESPONSIBILITY
'i!2./27/~
ASSESSl'IENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE W321 NJ HI6tU6HTIN6. ENS II -7 16/97/85 tlA ERROR: DELAY IN AECOONJZIN6 Ufflll CONDITION ON CAT. fff PROll.91 DESCRIPTION: CQIIIP DOES ~T HI6tl.I6HT/OCCENMTE LABELS, CAITI~ JIIESSAGES. (~DID URfl INTENSITY INADE IUITE.) 8788 PARAGRAPH rt/lllBEA: 6.7.2.4.P 6.7.2.5.K 6.7.2.7.A SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: MlDIFY SOFTWARE TO HIGHLIGHT IIIESSA6ES: FLASHING, INVERSE-VIDEO. fff DISPOSITION: UPSRADE PROCESS co,ipurEA. SEE PI-98 (28010381> DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUNBER: TP-7.1 IDIPUTER SYSTEJII REVIEW REMARKS: E-9 ITEJIIS ItMl.'JED: IARK NJIIIBER LOCATION IDIPONENT NAIIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII H ~T IN INV FILE t
- TITLE ttJA4 OOINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNITe CODE B RESPONSIBILITY V/2./27/86 ASSESS1£NT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A80321 LACK OF NECESSARY FEEDBACK. 11 -7 '1!6/U/85 IOIAH ERROR:
DELAYS IN RETRIEVING DATA. tff PROBlB! DESCRIPTION: COIIIPUTER DOES NOT DISPLAY FEEDBACK FOR: DELAYS IN PROCESSING REQUEST/ACTIVITY; COIIPLETICIN CF REQUEST/ACTIVITY. 071:18 PARAGRAPH l'UIBER: 6.7.2,6.K 6.7.2.6.L SU66ESTED BACl<F IT:
,ODIFY SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE THELY FEEDBACK.
DISPOSITION: tff IJ)SRADE PROCESS COPIPUTER. SEE PHIi l ~ l l , DATA ClllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIIBER: TP-7, l COO.HER SYST£111 REVIEW REl'Jl~S: E-10 ITEIIIS INY!l.VED: IAAK tt.lPIBER LOCATION COl'tPONENT NA.IE SYST£111 SUBSYST£111 H NOT 1N INV FILE 1
- HED t() TITLE tlR ENSINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY IIHT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 02./27/86 ASSESSPENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 20AN322 PRINTER SPEED. II -7 io/07/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY IN ~SSING REOOESTED INFCIIM!TI!Jf. fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: PROCESS Cl)IPIJTER PRINTER DOES "1T PRINT AT R£CCWIEND8) SP£ED Cf 3M LINES PER PIINUTE. 0780 PARAGRAPH UBER:
- 6. 7.3. l.D Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT:
UPGRADE PRINTER TO PROVIDE SUS6ESTED PRINT SP£ED, fff DISPOSITION: UPSRADE PROCESS CQIIIPl.JTER. SEE PI-90 (20N8301 >* DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTicr4 AND CODE ~BER: TP-7.1 COMPUTER SYSTail REVIEW REMARKS: E-12 IIDIS INVOLVED: NARK tu!BER LOCATlcr4 COIIPONENT , - SYSTail SUBSYSTail PROCESS COJIIP H MlT IN INV FILE I /
- TITLE HUMAN OOINE£RI1'6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 02/27/86 ASSESS/IIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 29A8l323 LACK OF PRINTER PROCEDURES. ENG II -7 81/30/86 IU!AN ERROR:
DELAY OR ERRORS IN l'IAINTAINll\6 COIIP\JTER PRINTER. tH PROBWI DESCRIPTION: r<<J PROC£DURES FOR IIIAINTAINING COIIIPUTER PRINTER (E,6., RIBBON CHAl'6E1 PAPER CHA&, ETC.> 8788 PARASRAPH NlJIIBER:
- 6. 7.3.1.E.3 SU36ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVID£ PROCEDURES. Hf DISPOSITION: 1Jl6RAD£ PROCESS COll'.PIJTER, SEE PI-90 (20000301), DATA CCUECTI~ ll£SCRIPTI~ AND CODE NURSER: TP-7, 1 COMPUTER SYSTE:"4 REVIEW R91ARKS: E-13 IIDIS INYll.YED:
~RI< MJIBER LOCATION COIRJNENT ~PE svsm1 SUBSYSTEPI PROCESS COi> ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f
- HED N'.I TITLE 1-UMN SURRY
£NSIN££RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 02./27/86 ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2'Ae8324 rtl T~ LP DEVICE FOR PRINTER PAPER. ENS II -7 06/07/85 HJIAN ERROR:
llAflA6E OR LOSS OF COlfll.JTER RECORDS. /
"* PROIA.al DESCRIPTION:
- N'.I TAKE UP DEVICE FOR PRINTER PAPER - PAPER FALLS~ BEHIND PRINTER.
87e& PARABRAPH NIJIIIBER:
- 6. 7.3.1.E.5 Sl66ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE TAKE UP DEVICE. Hf DISPOSITION: UPGRADE PROCESS CQIIIPUTER. SEE PI-90 (~l)
- DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-7.1 COMPUTER SYSTEJII REVIEW REJIIARKS: E-14. ITEJIIS IN'v(l.VED : IAIIK l'UIBER LOCATION CD,1PONENT NAPIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII PROCESS COlfl H N'.IT IN INV FILE*
- HED NO TITLE HUPIAN ENSINEERING DISCR'"'i;PANCY REPORT
. S'JRRY UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 02127/86 ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 20ANJ25 OBSCURED PRINTER OUTPUT ENS II -7 06/07/85 IUflN ERROR:
IIISREAD DISPLAY OUTPUT. H-1 PROael DESCRIPTION: PRINT HEAD ON PRINTER STll>S AT LAST CHARACTER PRINTED - OBSCURES VIEW OF OUTPUT. 0700 PARAGRAPH NIJIIIBER:
- 6. 7.3.1.F.1 6. 7.3.1.F.4 SL&STED BACKFIT:
IIKlDIFY SOFTWARE TO ISSUE LINE FEEDE COP'J'l'IAND TO PRINTER AT END OF LINE. lff DISPOSITION: I.PGRADE PROCESS CQffl)UTER. SEE Pl-~ <200003011
- DATA ctUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE TUBER:
TP-7.1 ro.PIJTER SYST~ REVIEW Ra!ARKS: E-15. IIDIS INVOC.VED:
~AK NJllllER LOCATION COfl'ONENT NAfilE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM COIi) PRINTER H ~T IN INV FILE t
- HUPIAN OOIN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT ~/27/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ASSESS~ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~ LIO( IF ~TRAST IF PRINTER OUTPUT. ENS II -7 06/07/85
~ ERROR:
READIN6 ERRORS. Hf PROIUM DESCRIPTION: 11.JTPUT ~RD TO READ FROPI LACK IF CONTRAST - PROB COflllOlWDED BY SUIRE ON Ii.ASS COVER, RIBBO N l<<JRN, r<<) REPLACEJIENT 87N PAIIASRAPH tUBER: 6.7.3.1.F.2 SU66£STED BACKF IT: INSTIU r<<l~R£ GLASS ON ENCLOSURE. ENSURE ADEOOATE SUPPLY OF RIBBONS AVAILABLE. CHANGE RI~ RE6ULARI..Y. Hf DISPOSITil)I: IP6RAOE PROCESS COPIPUTER, SEE PI-90 (20000301), DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-7,1 CQll!PUTER SYSTEM REVIEW REAARKS: E-16. IIDIS INYll.VED: IIIARK NJMBER LOCATION COJllONENT NAfllE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM PRINT 11.JTPUT H r<<lT IN INV FILE f
- HED I() TITLE HU~ EN61NEER1N6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 02/27/86 ASS~T STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE
~ 7 LOCK CF SELECTIVE C(M)UTER llJTPUT FOR ALARM IE~S. ENG 11 -7 06/07/85 tlA ERROR:
DELAY IN SYNTHESIZHE /URI! IESSA6ES. H4 PROBt.91 DESCRIPTION: OP CANhOT REQUEST SPECIAL PRINTOOT OF ALAR!IIS BY SROI.P (SYSTE/111 COfi!PON£NT, ETC.I. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUl'IBE R:
- 6. 7.3.2.C SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
l'ODIFY SOFTWARE TO ALLOW AL.ARP! SR0UPIN6. ff4 DISPOSITION:
- UP6RADE PROCESS COPIPUTER. SEE Pl -90 OOTA CCllECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-7.l ro.?UTER SYSTEl'I REVIEW (20000301 l, REJIIA~S: E-17, ITBIS INW.VED: IIWIRK tOIIIER LOCATION cmiPONENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H l'fJT IN INV FILE *
- HeD r<<:l TITLE
~
SURRY
£N6IN££RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY
~/27/86 ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 20Al8328 r<<:l ll.A~ IDENTIFICATI~ ~ PRINTOUT. ENS II -7 06/07/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY IN LOCATIIE IURf! ll!ESSA6ES. ffl PROll.EM DESCRIPTION: ll.ARN 1Essi:w£5 ARE 91BEDDED IN a>>IPUTER PRINTOOT, r<<:l READILY DISTINGUISHABLE FRQIII r<<:lN-ALAR 111 IESSA6ES. 171118 PARAGRAPH MJIIIBER:
- 6. 7.3.2..D SUSSESTED BACKFIT:
PROV ll!ETHOD TO DISTINGUISH IURl'I "5SGS. $U66EST ALRMS BEPRINTED IN RED OR WORD ALARPI WRITI EN IN CAPS BEFORE IESS fff DISPOSITION: lP6RADE PROCESS COPIPUTER. SEE PI-9e (~ll, DATA COLLECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE ruBER: TP-7.l COMPUTER SYST8'1 REVIEW Ra!ARKS: E-18. ITOO INVa.VED:
~RK NJIBER LOCATION ClM>ONENT tM: SYSTE!tl SUBSYSTBI PROCESS COi) H r<<:lT IN INV FILE* I
- HED t<<l TITLE ttMN SURRY EN6INEER1t<6 DISCREPANCY REPORT UNITI CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 02./27/86 ASSESS111ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE
~ t<<l 6RW>INi [F DISPLAY OJTPUT. . ENG II -7 06/07/85 tUIAN ERROR:
ERRORS IN READitt:i DISPLAY *. H4 PROBLEM DESCRIPTI~: STANDARD DISP PA6E IS TABI.£ [F PARAIETERS/WUES/SETPOINTS - OUTPUT t<<lT 6ROOPED/SEPARATED TO FACILITATE READING. 8788 PARAGRAPH OBER:
£>. 7,J,J,D,2 SUGGESTED BACKF IT:
.ODIFY SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE SPACE BETWEEN EACH 6Rrul OF FIVE Llr£S.
H4 DISPOSITI~: lP6RADE PROCESS COMPUTER. SEE PI-98 <20000301), DATA ClllECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUfllBER: TP-7,l CIIIPUTER SYSTEM REVIEW REMARKS: E-19 ITEJIIS INYa..VED: MIi< fUIBER LOCATION COIRJNENT NAfllE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM COfRJTER CRT ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t
- HED t<<l TITLE HU~ EN6INEER1N6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 alllE B RESPONSIBILITY tc./27/86 ASSESSJIIENT STATUS LAST DATE REVIEW 28AN338 INAIIEUTE SEPARATION BETWEEN Cll.lJINS ON CRT, ENS II -7 '116/0_7/85 ttMAN ERROR:
I READIN3 ERRORS. 1H PROa.£111 DESCRIPTION: COUJfE ~ INADEllJATE SEPARATION (1 ~RACTER WIDTH>, 97N PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.7.3.3.D.3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
,-;)DIFY SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE JIIINIIUI OF Tli<<l (2) ClflRACTER WIDTHS OF SEPARATION BETWEEN COLI.Jr4 NS.
1H DISPOSITION: lPSRADE PROCESS CQlllUTER, SEE Pl-90 (2000030]), DATA Cll.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND alllE OBER: TP-7,1 Cl)IPUTER SYST~ REVIEW R91ARKS: E-21. IIDIS INVClVElh l!AIIK tUIBER LOCATION IDIJOrENT rAE SYSTEfil SUBSYSTEJII COfllUTER CRT H NJT IN INV FILE t
- TITLE
~
SURRY
~INEERIIE DISCREPArCY REPORT UNIT0 CODE RESPCJeIBILITY 02/27/86 ASSESS/IIENT STATUS
- .AST REVIEW DATE CQIIIPI..T 04/26/85 11M ERROR:
FOREIGN OBJECTS ENTERINS THE !PENIIES COll.D CAUSc EQUIPIENT FAILURE/~TI~. Hf Plllll£lll DESCRIPTION: PAl£I.. ~ SEVERAL OPENlrei <HOLES> WHERE ~ T S liWEBEEN REJICVED, 07N PARAGRAPH NtMBER: 6.1.1. 3. 6 StmSTED BAO<FIT: PROCEDURE SHCllD BE ESTABLISHED TO ENSURE CONTROL PANEL OPENINGS/HOLES ARE GUARDED/COVERED fH DISPOSITION: D£l£TE: EQUIP BEING IIODIFIED, HOLES WILL BE COVERED WHENfl!ODS COfllPLETE. H!LES ALR EADY COVERED SIN:E PHOTOS TAKEN. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-1.1 lllRl<SPACE SURVEY REIIARKS: DS-3 ITEMS Il'Ml.VED: l!ARK NJIIIBER LOCATic>>I CQllllOt£NT NAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII EJIIER GEN 1 ff r(JT IN IN\/ FILE f IJlENINGS U-1 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t RAD lllN PNL ff r(JT IN INV FILE t
- TITLE ttJMN SURRY EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT UNIT0 CODE RESPONSIBILITY 02/27/86 ASSESS1£NT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A81117 StWIED EQUIP USASE, DISPLAYS, PIIXEIURES NOT ADEQUATE. ~T U/15/85 tlM ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IND> RESP!MiE. Hf P ~ DESCRIPTION: CTRL IF SHARED EQUIP INTERFERES BET Lt.lITS. SHARED EQUIP STATUS r<<JT DISPLAYED IN 00TH. (SEE
. RalARKSl 878B PARAGRAPH ruBER:
6.1.J.1.E. l 6.1.J.1.E.2 6.1.3, l.E.5 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IIID/l.lJGRDE EQUIP SO CTRLS CAN 8£ ~INT FR EA, PROVIDE STATUS INDIC FOR EA FOR ALL SHARED. lJl6RDE AJ)IIIIN PROC. fH DISPOSITION:
- DELETE - SPS IS ADl.ffl.--LINIT CR - GUIDELINE IS FOR SEPARATE CONTROL DATA ClllECTION 1lESCRIPTI[)4 AND CODE Nl.Jll!BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION ROOfllS
- REJIIAll(S:
PI-115, PROB DESC: ADJIIIN PROC !LLOCATING USE IF CTRLS INADEG ITEMS INYILVED: MtlK ftMBER LOCATION COflPOf£NT rM SYST91 SUBSYSTEM ADIIIN PROC H 1'JT IN INV FILE 1
- HED NO TITLE IUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPWCY REPORT SURRY UNITi CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 02/27/86 ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A81191 COf>OENTS ON~ NOT i¥>PRCl>RIAT8..Y/Ct.EARLY LABELED. ENS II -f, iS/28/85 IUAI ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPCJEE fff PROIUM DESCRIPTION: LABELING FOR COlllONENTS IS IN:ORRECT / Ir<<:l)f)l.£TE/IUSSIN6 UN PARAGRAPH OBER:
- 6. 6. 1. 1 6. 6. 3. 1. A 6. 6. 3. 2. B 6. 6. 3. 2. C SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
PERFORIII LABELING SURVEY TO DETERMIN£ LABELING NEEDS/CONCERNS OF OPS, RELABa BOARDS TO 01e e GUIDELINES fff DISPOSITION: PERFORIII STUDY AS RECOIIENDED ABOVE. (METER FACES, CB, ANNIJN TILES) CHECK HIERARC HY, LETIER SIZE, FACE, SPACING. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NUIIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY 11£MRKS: PI-82. fU CR COflPONENTS. ITEMS IfMI.IJED: N\AI< N.MBER LOCATION COlflOr£NT NAIE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEfll lHl-133 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t lJl-191 ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff'W FUJI U-1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t N ACK PB H r<<JT IN INV FILE I llJTO ~TV ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t BREMER ff l<<JT IN INV FILE t CXlfRlENTS ff l<<JT IN IrN FILE t
- CT"~ P TV ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t cnrr in TV HNOT IN IrN FILE t cm IVS H r<<JT IN INV FILE t
_cnrr S1J1> LV ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
- HED NO: 2Ml1101 lf.Jfl!AN SURRY EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT UNITB
'if2./27/86 ITEJIIS INVll.lJED:
IIAAK tullER LOCATION COfl)(MNT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 91£R CST LED ff NOT IN UN FILE f EXtAJST FANS ff NOT IN INV FILE* FAIL POSTN ff NOT IN INV FILE f FCY-ES-185 ff NOT IN INV FILE f FCV-ES-116 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* FCV-ES-107A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FCY-ES-1878 ff NOT IN INV FILE* FCV-ES-lasA ff l'(JT IN INV FILE
- FCV-ES-1888 ff NOT IN INV FILE f FI-1-948 ff NOT IN INV FILE*
FI-1-943 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FI-1685 BY F ff NOT IN INV FILE f FLASH EVAP P ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 GOV W 4 ff MJT IN INV FILE*
!§ANS (SOME) ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 UM HNOT IN INV FILE*
LUBE OIL ff NOT IN INV FILE
- l(IRE CW ORIG ff NOT IN INV FILE*
NJY-1869A ff NOT IN INV FILE f IOJ-18698 ff NOT IN INV FILE* PDTI PPS ff MJT IN INV FILE f PI-1-444 ff l'<<JT IN INV FILE f PI-1-445 ff riOT IN INV FILE f PI-1-455 ff NOT IN INV FILE f PI-1-456 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PI-1-457 ff l'<<JT IN INV FILE f PI-1-958 ff NOT IN INV FILE f PORV CST LED ff NOT IN INV FILE f P06ER SUPPlY ff MJT IN INV FILE f SUPPLY FANS ff l'<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TOT FI-1-941 ff NOT IN INV FILE f TURB SPD SEN ff NOT IN INV FILE f TV STATUS ff NOT IN INV FILE f ll-2 w Ul.S ff NOT IN INV FILE* YIT BUS PWR ff NOT IN INV FILE* I
- HED NO TITLE tiJMAN SURRY ENiINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT UNIT@ CODE RESPONSIBILITY 02/27/86 ASSESSl4ENT.
STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28Aell02 WllC>>ENT LABELING USES~ TERMS, ABBREVIATICNS, sma.s. w.PLT @7/11/85
~ ERROR:
IIBJlY/ERROR IN CP RESP(N;E, Hf PROa.EJII DESCRIPTION: r£W COIII' LABEL.HE USING TEClfHCR. TERMS/ABBREV IMF~ILIAR TO CPS. UN PARAGRAPH NlJll!BER:
~~~~D ~~~~E ~~~~A ~~15 SLG:iESTED BACKFIT:
RELAIU COf!PS ON BB ~ VB USINi ADPIIN PROC FOR USE OF ABBREVS/ACRONYl!iS, DISPOSITI~: DELETE - REFER TO PI-82 (20A811@1) FOR SEHERIC LABEL.INS STUDY, DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE M.JIIIBER: TP-6,1 LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY Ra!ARKS: PI-83 ITENS INVCl.VED:
!ARI< fUIIIER LOCATI~ CCNflC>>ENT NM:: SYSIDI SUBSYST91 "1111.00IC PN. H r<<JT IN INV FILE t VENT PML HNOT IN INV FILE t
- TITLE HUMN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CO~ A RESPIMIBILITY
'lic./27/86 ASSESS1'1£NT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2Wl136 I~TE ~RACTER SIZE. EN6 II "6/U/85 IU!AH ERROR: I R£ADIN6 ERRORS.
1H PROBLEM DESCRIPTI~:
~ R SIZE FOR DISPI.AY VALL£S IS INADE~TE 1,125*) FOR EXPECTED VIEWil'E DISTAtCE !APP ROX. 81 l.
87N PARASRAPH M.JNBER: 6.5.1.3.A SU66£STED BACKF1T: INCREASE CHARACTER SIZE TO ,4* - .6" fff DISPOSITI~: Ell/IP BEitE REl(JVED, REPLACED BY INTEGRATED CORE COOLINSSYSTEJII. CRDR WILL
~ I r,lUT TO ICC SYSTEM DESIBN.
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE Nl.fflBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRl<S: E-29 ITEMS Itf.Al.VED:
*IRK tull!ER L.OCATI~ CDIPONENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTE/11 CORE COO. "4 ff NJT IN INV FILE 1
- HED NO TITLE tlJNAN EN6lN£ERIN6 DISCRE?ArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT8 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY i2./27/86 ASSESS~T STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A81143 COIPCIENT LABELS ARE NOT SPECIFIC. ENS II -6 (57/11/85 IUAN ERROR:
DELAYED DECISION. fH PAOIUJII DESCRIPTION: Tl£ 00 CCJlll)(MNT LABELS "TRANSFER SWITCH" ARE NOT SPECIFIC. 8718 PARAGRAPH NIJIBER: 6.6. 3. 5 SU36ESTED BACl<FIT: l()DIFY ~ T LABELING OR US£ DEJIIARCATION/COLOR C0DIN6. fff DISPOSITION:
- REFER TO Pl-82 (20A81181l LABELINS STUDY*.
DATA ctUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJIIIBER: TP-6.1 *LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY DS-28. ( J ~ ROTARY SELECT SWITCHES> ITENS INUO..\/Elh IIAIIK MJIIIER LOCATII:* COfllOM:NT NAIE SYSTBI SUBSYSTBI l()T SHTDhW H r<<lT IN INY FILE 1
- TITLE 1tM EN6IN£ERIN; DISCREPArCV REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 02./27/86 ASSESSPIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28Atll48 I.NECESSARY IhfORMATI<J4 ~ LABELS. EN6 II -6 07/11/85 ltJllN ERROR:
NI!UAD n£ !PERATOR AS TO Tl£ FUrCTION (f" Tt£ BLOCK SWITCH. tH PROaEN DESCRIPTION: PRZR LYL SI NJ l.OtEER \qID AND SHW.D BE R0Kl'v'ED FR<>>! THE LABEL. 171N PARAGRAPH l'Uti!ER:
- 6. 5.1.1. C Sl&ESTED IIACl<FIT:
DilN6E LABELS TO READ: "LO PRZR PRESS SI ACT TRAIN AtlOCK", "LO PRZR PRESS SI ACT TRAIN B BLOCK" DISPOSITI~: lff REFER TO LABEL STUDY PI-82 (2iA01111l. DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ ,:WO CODE l'Uti!ER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: VC-391. "LO PRZR PRESS & LYL SI ~T TRAIN A !Bl BLOCK" I IDIS INYll.l.{I): MARK NJlll9ER LOCATI~ ~ NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM SEE REMARKS FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAfl SYSTEl'I ISIX.AT! ON VALVES
~ EhSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/17/86 SURRY ~IT 0 ClJDE C ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPC*SIBILITY STATUS DATE *
~1201 OJT-oF-SERVICE EQUIPIENT r<<IT DE-ENERGIZED, r<<IT T~ IXJT IN CR II -7 83/17/86
.._ ERROR:
ENER6IZIN6 EQUIMNT T~T IS TIO.Bil TO BE DE-ENERGIZED ffl PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: DIA. PWR SUPPLY EQUIP, WHEN ClJT-oF-SERVICE, FRElllNTLY DOES r<<IT ~ BOTH SUPPLIES DE-EHER SIZED OR TA66ED OUT 8700 PARAGRAPH fOIBER: 6.6.5,l.D SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: IMPROV£ PROCEDURES FOR PUlCIN6 EQUIPMENT OOT-Of'-SERVICE, JtQ.UDIN6 TAS-ClJT PROC£DURES ffl DISPOSITION: PERSONNEL SAFETY ~IDERATION. REVIEW EXISTING ADI'! PROCAND LIPSRADE AS NECESSARY
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fUIBER:
TP- 6.1 LABELS AND LOCATI~ AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-86 ITEl'IS INVO...\JED: LOCATION COMPONENT NAIi£ SYSTEM SUBSYST91 TA66IN6-0JT H r<<IT IN INV FILE t
- TITLE llA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT8 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY 02/27/86 ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 29A81215 I~TE como.. AND DISPUIY 6RllPIN6. ENS II -6 eJo/17/85 HJIAN ERROR:
DELAY IN !PERATIN6 CQNTR(l..S. fff PROll.EJI DESCRIPTION: SllE IIENTIL CTRLS ON COMIN PNL, OTl£RS ~ END ~IT VERTPN.S - PARTICULAR PROB W/ cnrr Pl.JR 6E FL !URS ON I.WIT l 1781 PARAGRAPH N.lflBER:* 6.8.2,l,A.2 SU66£STED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CONTAil'flENT PURSE FL!M PETERS AND CONTROLS TO CO/lllllON PANEL, fff DISPOSITION:
- REFER TO PI-117-3, REDESISN OOX. VENTILATION PAt£L DATA CD..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION E-4 ITBIS INYll.\(lh MIIK NJISER LOCATION COlllOt£NT PM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM YENTIL CTRLS H NJT IN HN FILE 1 /
\
IUIAH ENGINEERING DISCRmWCY REPORT 83/17/86 SURRY l.WIT 8 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A01216 NO LAMP TEST ENG II -6 93/17/.86
~ ERROR:
INABILITY TO ASSESS SYSTEMS STATUS. MISINTERPRETATION CF SYS TBI STATUS. fff PROIUJII DESCRIPTION: t<<J LAMP TEST FOR LEGEND LJSHTS/SWITCHES OR INDICATOR LIGHTS. 1700 PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER:
- 6. 4. 3. 3. c. 1
- 6. 5.3. l, A. 2 SUSGESTED BACl<FIT:
INSTALL UVilP TEST CAPABILITY - SEE r()RTH ~ FOR INSTRI.CTICWS. Hf DISPOSITION:
- INVESTIGATE FOR LAA? TEST FUNCTION ~y SAFETY SYSTEMS WITH LEGEND LIGHTS THAT HA VE SINSLE BULBS IN> THAT ARE NOT NOM.LY LIT, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE l'UIBER:
TP- 1, 7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY REJIIARKS: E-39. AU. INTERMU.Y-LISHTED COfl>ONENTS !EXCEPT IHU4S) ITE"9 INVOLVED: LOCATION COPl)()NENT NAfl£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM SEE REMARKS FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAM SYSTEfll ISCUITION YR..VES
- TITLE HUl'iAN SURRY ENSINEERINS DISCRmWCY REPORT UNIT0 CODE A RESPONSIBILITY 02/27/86 ASSESB,ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2Wll1385 U¥:K CF IDARCATION LINES II -5 11/11/85 KM ERIE!h ,
~YED/IN:ORRECT OPERATOR REPCWSE.
Ht PROll.EJI DESCRIPTII*: IIBIARCATICJI LINES t<<:IT USED CJI HJT ~ PANEL. 9711 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.6. 6. 2. A St&ESTED BACKFIT: DalARC t()T SHOWN PNL aill!INATil',1; NEED FOR O~/PtJRPLE TAPE/ARR!Mi US£D TO ASSOCIATE CTR!.. SWTD£S W/ PROC CTRLS fff DISPOSITION: IEAIOTE I ADD COLOR PATOfES AS ON l!'ICB. TAPE IS TO BE RE~ l REPLACED W/ ORA N6E I PURPLE CQ..OR DOTS ON LABEL. COORDIANTE WITH 1.2-4-6 122A02'~l. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIII.BER: TP-6. 1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-16 ITEJIIS ItMl..VED: IIARK UBER LOCATION l:()lf)()f8T NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII IIBIARC LitES H t<<:IT IN INV FILE t
- l£D t<<l TITLE ltJA EN6It£.ERIN6 DISCREPAtCY SURRY UNIT9 CODE B .
REPORT RESPONSIBILITY
~/27/Sh ASSESSJIIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2A1311 INCIJR.ETE ST~RDIZATION Al(JN6 PAfELS IF ~ITS 1 AND 2. ENG II -6 16/97/88 IUIAN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IJ> RESP(WSE. IM:REASED RELIAta ON IEfllRY. IN CREASED TRAININ6 TIJIIE. 1t1 PRO!l.£JI DESCRIPTION: ARRANEENT, LOCATION &11£SIBN IF AMO TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, l.ABEI.S NJT ST~IZED FORS UIILAR PN.S CF EA ~IT 1788 PARAGRAPH NJIIBER: 6.8.2.4.A SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: USIN6 THE LIST PROVIDE STANDARDIZATION FOR SIIULAR FUM:TIONS AS APPROPRIATE. fH DISPOSITION:
~ DIFFEREFCES IN LABEi.INS BET ~ITS WILL BE HANDLED BYLABELINS STUDY PI-82 <20 Alllll>, ANY DIFF BET CREMRKSI DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.JflBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION IIEJIIARl(S: DS-29 DISP:!MITS DUE TO SYS DIFF tiWE BEEN DELETED. ITEMS INYCx.UED: 111111< NllllER LOCATION COIIOfENT AE SYSTEM . SUBSYSTEJII SEE ORIS l£D ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t
- HED Ill TITLE IOJIN SURRY EN6Ir£ERIN6 DISCREAA'CY REPORT UNIT0 CODE B RESPOEIBILITY 02/27/86 ASSESSIENT STATUS I.AST REVIEW DATE 2A1312 ll<<nl>LETE STANDARDIZATI~ AIOE PAr£LS CF UNITS 1 AND 2. II -7 '116/07/85 ttllAN ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN CP REsm.sE. Ir<<:REASED RELIArCE ON JIEORY, IN CIIEASED TRAININ3 TIii:. Hf PAOIUJII IIESCRIPTI~: A R ~ , LOCATI~ & D£SI~ OF ANO TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS t()T ST!NJARDIZED FOR S IMILAR Pfl.S OF EA I.NIT 1718 PARAGRAPH fOIBER1 6,8.2.4.A 9J86ESTEil BACKFIT: USIPE THE LIST PROVIDE STINJARDIZATION FOR SHULAR FUNCTIONS AS ~PROPRIATE. fff DISPOSITI~i REARRAN6E UNIT 1 !£TEA TO MATCH THOSE IN ~IT 2. DATA ctUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION RalM<S: DS-29-67 (1> ITBIS INVll.YED: IA~ tOl!ER LOCATI~ COIIRJENT rWE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII FI-1-122A ff t()T IN INY FILE t PI-1-121 ff lllT IN IPN FILE t
tllMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/20/86 SURRY UNIT 0 CODE B ASSESSfllENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A1313 INCOMPLETE STANDARDIZATI~ AMONG PANELS OF UNIT 1 AND 2, EN6 II -6 03/17/86 HI.IP'iAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OP RESPONSE, INCREASED RELIANCE ON MEl'ORY. IN CREASED TRAINING TIIE. Hf PROBWI DESCRIPTION: ARRANGEIIIENT, LOCATION &DESIGN OF ANNUN TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS NOT STANDARDIZED FORS IIIIILAR PNLS IF EA UNIT 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER:
- 6. 8,2,'+,A SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:
USING THE LIST PROVIDE STANDARDIZATION FOR SI"ILAR FUNCTIONS AS APPROPRIATE. DISPOSITION: REARRANGE STATUS LTS IN UNIT 2 TO IIIATCtl THOS IN UNIT 1, (ENSURE WORDING MATCHES Al.SO). REFER TO PI-69 120A02303l
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUIBER:
TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: DS-29-F9
!TOO INVOLVED:
fllARI< NUMBER LOCATION COMPONENT NAl'IE SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEM STATUS LTS ff NOT IN INV FILE *
- t£D t<<) TITLE ti.IA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY ~IT0 CODE C RESPONSIBILITY 02./27/86 ASSESS/IIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 29Ai1314 Ir<<:CNlLETE ST!ldlARDIZATICW "8E PAIELS IF ~ITS 1 AND 2, EN6 111-9 tfJ/17/85 ltR ERROR:
~Y/ERAOR IN CP R£SPCWSE. Ir<<:REASED RELIAfCE ON flDJRY. IN CREASED TRAINING TIIIE.
fff PROa.91 .DESCRIPTION: ARRANE£NT, LOCATION I DESIGN IF IMO TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS t()T ST~IZED FOR 5 Ifill.AR PNI..S CF EA um 1718 P A ~ ~ : 6.8.2,4.A SUSGESTED BACl<FIT: USIN6 THE LIST PROVIDE ST!NlARDIZATION FOR SIIIILAR FLJrCTIONS AS APPROPRIATE. lff DISPOSITION:
- REARRANSE 6 THlllB ROTARIES ON UNIT 1 TO MTCH DATA ctl.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE l'UIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION nm CJ4 lNIT 2. IEWl<S1
~J9 ITEMS IfMl.VED:
IIARK tUllER LOCATI~ C(lll()£NT rAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM
/
ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff NlT IN INV FILE 1 H t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE I ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<rr IN INV FILE 1
- 1£1) It) TITLE IUIAN ENiINEERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RE~IBILITY 02./27/86 ASSESSIIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A81J15 Ir<<:Oll>LETE ST~RDIZATI~ AfOE ~S CF I.WITS 1 AND 2, II -7 11/30/86 IUW4 ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IJl RESP(NlE. Ir<<:REASED RELHKE ~ flEl()RY, IN CREASED TRAINING TIIE. fH PROll9I DESCRIPTI~: ARRAtliEIENT, LOCATI~ & DESISN IF ANO TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS NlT ST~IZED FOR S IIIILAR PN.S CF EA Ltm 8781 PARA6RAPH ttff!BER: 6.8.2.4.A SU86ESTED BACl<FIT: USIN6 THE LIST PROVIDE ST~IZATION FOR SUIILAR FUtCTIONS AS APPROPRIATE. fff DISP0SITI~1
- DWfE ~ R.ARfl LIGHTS TO RED ISEE PASE 15 FOR LISTJ ON I.MIT 2 TURBirE SUPERVIS ORY PAIEL,
~TA co..LECTil)f DESCRIPTil)f AND CODE fUIBER:
TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ REIWIKS1 DS-29-Jll 11 ITEIIS ItMl.Wh MIi< fUIER LOCATil>>f C(Jll)(J£NT ~ SYSIDI SUBSYSIDI 1¥.ARN LIGHTS H l'CIT IN INV FILE f
ttJMN ENSIN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY ~ IT @ CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A1316 INCOfllPLETE ST/rIDARDIZATI~ ~NG Pf:WELS OF UNITS 1 AND 2, ENS II -6 03/17/86 HlM ERROR:- DELAY/ERROR IN OP RESPONSE. IfCREASED RaIANCE ON IEPIORY. IN CREASED TRAINING TIME, fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: ARRANSEl'IENT, LOCATION l DESIGN OF ANNUN TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS NOT STANDARDIZED FORS Il'1LAR PNLS OF EA ~Ii 87110 PARAGRAPH tO'.BER: 6.8.2.;,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: USING THE LIST PROVIDE ST~RDIZATION FOR SIMILAR FUNCTIONS AS APPROPRIATE. ffl DISPOSITION: CHANGE RC'~ LISHT ON UNIT 2 TO YELLOW LISHT FOR "E).ERG SEN 12 TRIP AUX RESET BUTT
- ~*. CHANGE LABELING ALSO. COORDINATE WITH PI-62 120003033)
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M.J!'.BER:
TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REfllRKS: DS-29-Hl (2) I IDIS INVOL. VED: MRI< NIJIIIBER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAfi!E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEI': HNOT IN INV FILE t
- l£D N) TITLE
~
SURRY EltiINEERlrE DISCIIEPM:V REPORT
~IT8 aJDE RESPOEIBILITY 02/27/86 ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 21A02111 DISPU\YS TOO UM ~ Mt£1.S. . l'OE aM>L.T 91/97/85 KNlN ERROR:
IBOirE ERRORS LEADirE TO ERRORS IN CCMRCl. ~TIYATION tH PlUl.91 DESCRIPTION:
~ OBSCURE DISPLAYS PtXED LOW ON VERTI~ ~S, CJ>£RATORS llJST L£AN OCROSS 00A RDS FOR READINGS 8718 ~ NJIIIBER:
6,1,2.5.B SU66ESTED BACKF IT:
!()YE Dl~VS TO HI9£R POSITION FOR EASY R£ADirE OR REPOSITION DESK/CONSOi.£ HIGHER FOR Ill NITORING.
1H DISP0SITION1 REFER TO 1£Dt1,2-4 122A83039>
- DATA CCllECTI!l4 DESCRIPTI!l4 1M) CODE OBER1 TP-1,2 ANTH~RICS SURVEY R91All{S:
PI-28, YIEWIN6 DATA FR(JI YERIF. ITBIS IrMl.VEIi: MIi< N.NIER LOCATION COl!POfENT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CR-ss-ell H NJT IN INY FILE f CR-SS-281 H NJT IN INV FILE 1 ELEC INTSRTR H NJT IN INY FILE 1 FC'HN-287 H t<<JT IN INV FILE I FCV-fW-25l1A H NJT IN INV FILE f FCY-fW-c5IB H NJT IN INY FILE 1 SW IDIP RCRD H t<<JT IN lffJ FILE 1
- l£D NO TITLE
~
SURRY ENJIN£ERlN6 DlSC~Y REPORT t.tme CODE RESP04SIBILITY rl/27/86 ASSESSPENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2IAl2ll2 DISPUYS LOCATED TOO HIGH 114 PAfELS 91/97/85 tUIAN ERIDI 1 JEL.AY OR ERROR IN O>ERATOR RESP!lEES 1H PROa.91 I1ESCRIPTION1 IIJST USE STCXl. TO READ DISPLAYS LOCATED TOO HIGH 114 PANELS TO AVOID PA~X AND Ii.AR£ 1788 PARAGRAPH IUIBER: 6.1.2. 5. B Sl&ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE DISPt.AYS TO LOWER LOCATION fH DISPOSITI~: REFER TO 1. 2-4 (22A03039>
- DATA cw.ECTIIJ4 DESCRIPTI~ AND COD£ N.JIBER1 TP-1.2 ANTHROPOETAICS SURVEY 1E'Aft(S1 PI-21. VIEWIN6 DATA FIOI VERIF.
IT91S INV(L',tDs MARK NJIIER LOCATION CClflPOrENT JM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII a.JS 1 H NJT IH INV FILE t BUS 2 ff MlT IN INV FILE* a.JS 3 ff NJT IN INV FILE t BUS 4 ff NOT IN INV FILE t EL£C BUS \/LT ff NJT IN INV FILE t FI-2-474 LM417 IETER MAIN STEAM SYSID FI-2-475 LAB417 PETER IIIAIN STEAi'I SYSIDI FI-2-476 H l'<<JT IN INV FILE t
- FI-2-4n LI-2-921 LI-2-922 ff NJT IN
~ 1 IETER NABJel IETER INV FILE t SAFETY INJECT!~ SYSIDI SAFETY INJECT!~ SYSTEM lm.JIIIULATORS ACCUltJLATORS
- t£D J<<l 1 28A82N2 ltJIIIAN SURRY ENSINEERI,E DISCREPiKY REPORT UNITI VJ2127/&6 IT01S INYCLVED:
~tOl£R LOCATICJI COffflENT tAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM Ll-2-924 r<<Jel METER SAFETY INJECTI~ SYSTEM ACWU.ATORS LI-2-926 ~ METER ~ INJECTI!14 SYSTEM ACrutl.ATORS LI-2-928 NAB3l2 IETER SAFETY INJECTICJI SYSTEM ~TORS LI-2-938 NAC382 IIETER SAFETY INJECTICl4 SYSTEM ACOJU.ATORS LI-cs-291 NAA388 METER COOAINIENT SPRAY SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD PWR SlP INST ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t AR-RN!H32 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t RR-RIE-133 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t TI-2-133 LM317 METER REACTOR CCXl.ANT (PRIMRY LOOP, PWRl SYS REACTOR COOLANT~
TI-2-411B LAC413 IETER REACTOR COOLANT <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-2-412A LAB414 PIETER REACTOR CCXl.ANT IPRIMRY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-4128 LM414 METER REACTOR coo.ANT (PRIIIIARY UXP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-421B NAC413 METER REACTOR coo.JlNT IPRIMRY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-422A NAB414 METER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-4228 NM414 METER REACTOR COil.ANT (PRIMRY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-2-431B C¥1C413 IETER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD
- TI-2-432A TI-2-43211 TI-fC-283 YI-VNS-2NA YI-YMS-2818 YI-IJNS-2NC
~14 lllETER
()lA414 METER l.AB.315 NAA319 Nm319 NAC319 METER IETER IETER JETER REACTOR coo..ANT IPRIMRY REACTOR coo.ANT (PRI~RY FUEL PIT COO.ING SYSTEJ!! fllAIN S~ SYSTEM IIIAIN STEAM SYSTEM IIIAIN S~ SYSTEJII LOOl, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD PRESSURIZER PRESSURIZER PRESSURIZER YI-YNS-281A NAA329 IETER MIN STEAM SYSTEM PRESSURIZER YI-\INS-211 B ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t YI-YNS-291C tt t()T IN INV FILE t
- t£D NO TITLE It.A OOINEERINS DISCREPIKY REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE A RESPONSIBILITY
'iJc./27/86 ASSESSIENT STATUS
~T REVIEW DATE 2tA828l3 IU.TISCA.E INDICATORS t(JT IJIERATI[NUY BBEFICI~ TO CPERATORS. EN6 II -S 81/12/86 IUIAH ERROR:
NAY~ D£LAY/ERROR IN IPERATOR RESP!N,E FIOI INABILITY TO VERIFY OR IOITOR PAl9£TERS. fff PROll.91 DESCRIPTICII: UTISCIU INDICATORS AR£ l<<JT B8EFICI~ TO IPERATORS. SCUS ARE ~INS. OPS. PREFER 0 NE-TIHJE RELATIOEHIP 1788 PARAGRAPH tulBER: 6.S.l.S.F 9J66ESTED BACKFIT: POSSIBLY SPLITIN6 llJT IIJLTiroti INDICATOR TO CONTAIN M NEEDLE PER SC~ DISPOSITI~:
- CODE SCIU TO INDICATE PEN/SOU RELATIONSHIP, COORDitflTE WITH JP-16 (22A82409l
- DATA cw.ECTICII DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER:
TP-5. l DISPtAYS SURVEY
~S:
PI-74-1. ITEMS IfMLIJED: NARI< N.111ER LOCATICII CDIO£NT rAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TI RECORDERS ff NJT IN INV FILE t /
- TITLE IUAI EN6INEERirE DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE B RESPCIEIBILITY W27/86 ASSESS,ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2IAl2ll4 POINTER VISIBILITY IS POOR~ sal.ES. ENS III-7 11/11/85 11M ERROR1 MY DUE IPERATOR READifE ERRORS DUE TO POOR CONTRAST AND T t£ tEIQffS IF SCME IETERS.
1H PROllBI DE!K:RIPTI!lt: CAtNJT READ POSITI!lt INDICATI!lt t,i !DUS, POOR CONTRAST 8ETWE£N axK POINTERS/IUO< sal. E aJflQJRATIIJ6. 1718 PAIIASRAPH !UBER: 6.5.2.2.C QJ66ESTED BACl<FIT: IIEPIA'.:E BUO< POINTERS ~ INDICATORS WITH RED POINTERS. DISPOSITION: IIEPUWENT IETERS WILL BE SPECIFIED TO KlYE RED POINTERS. EXISTINS a.R::K POINTE RS ARE DI!K:ERNAll.E. DATA cw.ECTI!lt DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE ~R1 TP-5. l DISPt.AYS SURVEY
*AEMAl<S1 PI-75. ITEMS INYCLYED: U YERTICI¥- IETERS I~>
ITEJIIS INIJ[l.~1 fM< MJNSER LOCATI~ CDIIOtENT tM: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM H NJT IN INV FIL£*
- l£D NO TITLE Hl.lfl94 SURRY EN6INEERI~ DISCREPIKY REPORT lMITt CODE B RESP!JEIBILITY t2/28/86 ASSEss.-ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A82N5 REOOIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS ARE IUSSIMJ FD CR. ENG II -6 11/11/85 tfMW ERROR: ,
MAY~ DELAYS/ERRORS INIJ>ERATOR R£SPIME IX£ TO I.HlVAILA BILITY CF REOOIRED INSTRtJENTATICN. fff PROBlal DESCRIPTION: IU. YISlR. DISPLAYS AND INDICATION NECESSARY TO l£ET TASK REllJIREBTS ARE NOT PRESENT IN Tl£ CR. 1780 PARAGRAPH rutBER:
- 6. 1.1.1. A 6. 5. 1. 1. B 6. 5. 1.1. E 6. 5. 4.1. 6 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE CR WITH THE VISIA. DISPLAY AND INDICATIONS LISTED. DISPOSITI0N1 PROVIDE CR WITH DISPLAYS LISTED ON BACK CF THIS FOHN* DATA co..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-n-1. <SEE C-20 (22AIJ2e6ll. ITEMS INY(l.VED: IARK NJl!ER LOCATI~ C()l)l)£NT IA£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM
.ec tt> TK LIil. ff NOT IN INV FILE f .ec PRESS IND ff tfJT IN INV FILE*
CORE COO.I~ ff NOT IN INV FILE f EXC LETDN FL ff NOT IN INV FILE* INCORE T/C ff NOT IN INV FILE f i.N STN EFLNT ff tflT IN INV FILE* Pel. BLD-D IF ff NOT IN INV FILE* RCS BOR aK ff tflT IN INV FILE*
- IIEJIJTE STAND ff NOT IN INV FILE
- S6 BlWDN RM ff NOT IN INV FILE*
TB OIL BERT ff NOT IN INV FILE*
It.A EN6INEERitE DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT VJc./28/86 SURRY LNITI COif A ASSEss,ENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPCNSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21Alt2115 Ill.TI~ INDICATORS NOT CJIERATICMLY BENEFICI!l. TO CJIERATORS. TRG II -5 81/30/86 ti.A ERRCHI: DELAY /ERROR IN CJ) RESPOEE*
.._ PROaEM DESCRIPTICIC:
IU.TISCU: RECORDERS ARE NOT BEIEFICI~ TO CPERATORS. sal.£5 ARE cnFUSitE. CPS PREFER H
-TD-<JE: RELATI~IP.
1710 PARAGRAPH ttER:
- 6. 5.1. 5.F SU66ESTED BIO<FIT:
POSSIILY SPlIITitf:l 00T lt.11..TISCU: RECORDERS TO CONTAIN H NEEili PER SCIU.
... DISPOSITION:
TRAIN OP£RATORS TO US£ TREND RECORDERS FOR TRENDitf:l !RY AND USE INDICATORS FOR
- DATA READIN6 RBl. TIIE WM.LES.
cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION i:wD CODE NJIIIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRKS: PI-74-2. ITEMS INYCl.\tn:
~ NJIBER LOCATION COfP(J£NT N¥E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM HNOT IN INV FILE t
11.R EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAN:V REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY ~ITI CO[( A ASSESSMENT ~T REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A12116 111.TISCfU INDICATORS t<<JT CJlERATICJA.l.Y BENEFICIIL TO CJ>S. TRS II -5 11/38/86 tullN ERmR1 DELAY/ERROR IN fP RESPONSE. Ht Pm.Ell DESCRIPTIC>>o IU.Tlsal.E IEaJRDERS ARE l<<JT BEHEFICHl. TO IPERATORS. SCll.E S ARE COFUSIN6. CJ>S PREFER ~ E-TIHI£ REUITICNHIPS 17N PARA6RMi N.MBER: 6.5.1.5.F SU6l£STED BACKFIT: POSSlll.Y SPUTTirE llJT IU.TISCILE REaJRDERS TO CONTAIN ONE NE&E PER SCILE. Ht DISPOSITION: sau/PEN RELATIONSHIPS AR£ CURRENTLY CODED. INITIATE JOB PERFON<<:E f£ASURE TO READ IU.TISOU RECORDERS. DATA allECTICW DESCRJPTI~ ~ CODE N.IIIBER:
*TP-5. 1 DISPt..AYS SURVEY RBIARKS:
Pl-74-5, 7,8. ITEMS INV!l.lJED ARE ILL ~ REaJRDERS. ITEMS IfMl.lJED1 fM< tUIIER . LOCATICW aJl>MNT tM SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM B ~R RCADR ff t<<JT IN INV FIL£* LIIIJID WASTE ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ I PROCESS VENT ff t<<JT IN INV FIL£* RWST ff t<<lT IN UN FILE 1
HUIAI EtEINEERIN6 DISCREPKY R£PORT e2/28/86 SURRY LMITII CODE B
~ss,or LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCJelBILITV STATUS DATE 21A12117 Ill.TI~ INDICATORS NOT IJ>ERATIIHUY BBEFICHl. TO CIIERATORS, II -7 11/38/86 ltM ERRORz DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESPCNlE.
Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~:
.U.TISC"-E INDICATORS ARE NOT BENEFICUl. TO CPERATORS. SCIUS ARE COFUSIN6. CPS PREFER ~
E-TO-<lE RELATI!HliIP 1780 PARA6RAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.5.1,5.F SU6GESTED BACKF IT: POSSIBLY SPLITTING ClIT llll.TISC$U INDICATOR TO CONTAIN CN: NEEDLE PER SC$U, DISPOSITI!t4: CODE LE6END PLATE TO SHIJ4 CHllf£L/sati RELATIONSHIP, REFER TO LABELING STUDY PE
- R PI-82 t2eA&l191),
DATA CO..UCTIC* 11£SCRIPTI~ AND CODE tUIBER: TP-5. l DISPLAYS SURVEY AEJIAIIKS1 Pl-74-11. ITEMS ll'Ml.VED: NAIi< IOIIER LOCATII* COIIJO£NT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TUIIB VIS REC ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t
/
tUAI ENSINEERIN; DISCREPIW:Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY Ltml co~ B . ASSSSIEHT LAST REVIEW l£D t<<l TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAl2835 REIIJIRED DISPl.AYS AND INDICATI!Je IUSSINJ FR!JI CR. II -6 17/11/85 KM ERROR: 11£LAY/ERROR IN a> RESPOE£. ffl PRmL0I DESCRIPTIClh ll.l. Yist.K DISPLAYS AND INDICATI~ tECESSARY TO IEET TASK REIIJIR0EHTS ARE t<<lT PRESENT IN TI£ CR. 1710 PARAS~ rtJIIIBER: 6.1.1, 1, A 6. 5. 1, 1, B 6. 5.1.1, E 6. 5. 4. 1. 6 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE CR WITH Tl-£ YISIA. DISPlAY AND INDICATIONS LISTED, ffl DISPOSITI~: . FOR FLOW CONTRCllERS LISTED ADD DI6ITAL INDICATION (RED AND GREEN LIGHTS) *
- DATA CCllECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND~ UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATIOH TP-5.1 DISPl.AYS SURVEY
~RKS:
PI-n-2. ITEJIIS INYn.VED:
~ tollER LOCATION OOllOfENT PM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FCV-2122 RAA914 PROCESS CONTRW.ER D£l11Ial. AND YCLIJ£ IXWTRa.. SYSTEM CHARGIN; FCY-2161 DAB125 PROCESS CONTRW.ER D£lll1CA. AND VCl.lJE CCJ4TRO.. SYSTEM ~
FCY-2615 BAAU 7 PROCESS CONTRW.ER RESIDlR. !£AT REPIMl. SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FCY-QHN QMl57 PROCESS CONTRCl.LER 6AS WASTE RADIOOCTIIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FC'HW-111 QA8857 PROCESS CONTRW.ER 6AS WASTE RADIOOCTIIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD i<<:V-21~ DAA116 PROCESS CONTRW.ER RESIDlR. IEAT REJIKMl. SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD ICY-2186 DAA124 PROCESS CONTRCllER C1£Mlal. AND YWJIE CONTR!l. SYSTEM !ECTOR cm.JWT PIJl>S i<<:V-2756 DAA115 PROCESS CONTRCU.ER RESIDlR. !£AT~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD 1£V-LW-184A OAA851 PROCESS CONTRCU.ER SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD
~1148 GBAl51 PROCESS ~TRW.ER SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD PCV-2145 ff NJT IN INY FILE*
It.A ENSINEERIN3 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY LWIT8 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPIMIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAl2t36 DISPtAY ~ TOO HISH. II -6 06/af./85 tlM ~R: READING ERRORS. I fff PROllDI DEOCRIPTIC>>h DISPLAY IOl(TED TOO HI9i FOR lm.JRATE READINi (79 1 IFF DECIO.
"7N PARAGRAPH OBER:
6.1.2.5.B Sl&ESTED ~IT: CPERATIOtA./ENSINEERIN6 STUDY TO DETERMINE FEASIBILITY CF RELOCATINi DISPUIY. fff DISP0SITIC*1 DME TO MTRS W/ L.AR6ER £1:IUS. IIIPROVE sa¥-E RA'6E TO OCCOODATE FULL FLCM. TI LT FORWARD TO Ilil>ROVE RBi>ING. DATA cru.ECTICII DESCRIPTICII IWD CODE N.11&:R: TP-9. 2 ~RIFICATI~ i:r.D Wl.IDATI~ IEIARKSI
£-23. !PERATOR COIIENT DURING SURVEY.
ITENS INYCl.VEJh
~ ftllllER LOCATICII CCJll()ENT JAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FI-YS-116 ~ILATICII SYSTEJII FI-YS-119 VENTILATI~ SYSTB!
llJA EN6INEERIN3 DI!l:REPIKY REPORT 82./28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE ASSEss.ENT ~T REVIEW TITLE RESPIJEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2837 I~/CIN=USINi DISPLAY WI.I.ES. COIIIPLT 16/17/85 II.NIH ERROR: READIN3/aJNERSI~ ERRORS. lff PfQl.91 IeCRIPTI~:
~TOR REPORTED T~T DISPLAYED VALLES REIIJIRE IDT~ CDNERSI~ TO PERFOIII IJIERATI~
1718 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.5.1.2..B SU66ESTED BfDFIT: PERFOIII IJIERATI~ STUDY TO DETEIIIINE APPROPRIATE DISPUlY WI.LES - l()DIFY la0RDIN6I.Y. lff DISPOSITICN: REFER CNDSR COVERED PI-72 (21A82202l. DELETE~RaR. FILTERS W/IN NOii! CONVENTI
~ ~ NOT ADVISABLE NES XFR DATA CXllECTI~ DE!l:RIPTI~ AND CODE tUIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATICN AND "'"-IDATI~ AEMRKSI
£-2-4. OPERATOR COMNT DURING SURVEY.
ITBIS IrMl.VEDa - flARK ftJfllER LOCATI~ C()ll()£NT NAME SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM PIC-YS-117A ff NOT IN INV FILE t PIC-YS-1178 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PHN-UUA ff NOT IN INY FILE t PR-OHl1B ff NOT IN INV FILE t
ltJIW EN6INEE11Itfi DISC~Y REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY UNITI COIE ASSESSIENT ~T REVIEW . TITLE RESPCIEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IAl2l38 OBSCURED DISPLAY POINTER. C(N)L.T 96/17/85 11.R ERROR: READIIE ERlllR. Hf PROa.£111 DESCRIPTI~: POINTER Cf DISPLAY IS OBSCURED BY BEZa. UN PARASIW'H IUIBER:
- 6. 5. 2. 2. B Sl.8£STED BACKFIT:
CUT~ BEZEL TO REVBl. ENTIRE SCll.E ~ POINTER. lff DISPOSITI~: DELETE-DESPITE A Ml. ~ T IF PARIUAX, INDICATORS ARE EASILY READ. ~ ~TI~
- REQUIRED.
DATA CCUECTIOH DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE IUIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY Ra!A~: E-25, UTEJII INYCl.VED IS CONTR(ll.ER FOR FI-YS-117Bl ITEJIIS HMl.YEDt
,ARK lt.N!ER LOCATI~ mRJENT ~ SYSIDI SUBSYSIDI FI-YS-117B ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
ltJIAN ENSINEERIN6 DISl:REPAN:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITI COIi: B ASS£55,ENT LAST REVIEW HED Ml TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82l39 WORN DISPLAY SOU:S - TREND RECORDERS II -6 ~/87/85 11M ERROR: DISPLAY READING ERIIJRS.
"* PR(IUN DESCRIPTI~r TREND RECORDERS~ l<<JRN OR DAIAiED SCSUS.
17N~OBER:
- 6. 5. 4.1. C SUB6ESTED IW:KFIT:
I ~ MRS TO REPUU l<<JRN SCll..ES.
"* DISPOSITI~:
AS PER MCl<FIT RECOMIENDATIONS~
- DATA CCLLECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS QJRVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ ANO VAI..IDATJ(Jj RBIARKS1 E-:2£, DATA cru..ECTI~ FRCII OBSERVATI~. JIDIS JNVQ.VED: NARK tUIIER ux:ATI~ COMPC>>ENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FR-2-2548 SAA315 RECORDER ~TOR COOJlHT (PRI~Y LCXP, PWR> SYS PR-OHl1A ff Pill IN INV FILE t PR-OH81B ff NJT IN INV FILE f TR-1-419A ff l<<JT IN INV FILE t TR-2-614 SAA314 RECORDER RESIDtR. 1£AT RalMl. SYSIDI TR-MS-181B ff NJT IN INV FILE t TR-MS-111D ff f<<JT IN INV FILE t
11.JA ENGINEERIN6 DI~Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITI CO~ ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW t£D II) TITLE RESPC1EIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IAl2l4I VERTICR. aLIJINS (F DISPLAYS CDR.T @6/07/85 11.M ERAOR: DELAY IN SC!Mlfli INDICATORS fff PIUILEJII IIESCRIPTl~I w cm ISO INDICS ARE OR6ANIZ£D IN VERTICll. COJJINS RAHTER nR4 lflRIZ~T~ ROIS. 1711 PARAGRAPH rtJIIIER: 6.8.3.2..A Sl&ESTED BACl<FIT: t<<J BACKFIT RECOMIENDED: POTENT!~ FOR NESATIYE TRANSFER OF TRAININ6 IS TOO GREAT~ fff DISP0SITI~1 DELETE~ WITH SU66ESTED BACl<FIT*
- DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION RENARKSI E-43. cm ISO W INDICS TY-BD-280A THAU TY-IA-201B SYSTEM SUBSYSTEN FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAi.. SYSTEM Iso.ATION Wl.VES
/
tlR EN6UEERIN6 DISC~ REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY IMIT0 CODE ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW l£D t<<). TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82Ml EXCESSIVE rutBER CF SINIUIR DISPUIYS IN LMRO<EN STAINS. C(NJ\.T to/17/85 IUA4 ERlllR1 CP ERROR (CPERATICII CF WRH a>>RJENT Ill£ TO SIMILARITY>, fff PROSl.91 DESCRIPTICII: t<<l DEMRCATICII OR SEPARATic>>4 FOR STRIN6S Cf' DISPLAYS 6REATER Tl-Al 28 1 IN LENiTH, UN PARASRMi r<<JIBER1 6.8.3.2.B 6.8.3.2.C SU66ESTED BAO<F IT: DEMRCATE STRINGS fff DISPOSITICII: DEL£TE-STRIN6 JEl'.\RCATED BY CNm ISO.. Pt& WHICH IS 1¥l?ROP FOR FI.JfC USASE:, FUR TIER IEWE IOU BE CTN=USIN6. DATA allECTICII D£m:RIPTIC11 AND CODE tUIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATICII AND Wl.IDATI()I REJIUIKS: E-44. cm ISO w, IND TV-BD-281A THRU TV-IA, P384 THRU V307 ITENS INVa.YED: NA~ ldllER LOCATICII Cl)l)(N:NT fAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM* Fl!A211 Dlm:RETE IIJTARY ~IN STEAIII SYSIDI Isa.ATic>>4 Wl.VES
tU9I EN6INEERIN3 DI~Y REPORT e2/28/86 SURRY ~ITI COD£ B ASSESSIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE ~ I BILI TY STATUS DATE
~ 1'1RROR IMASED DISPLAYS ENG II -7 V/6/97/85 tUIAN ERROR:
FAIWRE TO LOCATE CORRECT DISPLAY. .; fff PD.Bl DESCRIPTI~: DISPLAY ARE MIRROR IJIIA6£D. < ~ FILTER ()I C(>>llllil VENT~ PIC/FI-VS-117A/Bl 9711 PARA6RAPH NlJIBER: 6.8. 3. J Slll6ESTED eio<FIT: PROVIDE CODING TO EtffKE DISPLAY RECOOHITI()I. REVERSINSDISPl.AY LOCATIONS NJT RECIJIENDED. fff DISPOSITI~: PROVIDE UIIELS TO EfffN:E DISPLAY RECOOHITI()I-REFER TO LABEIN6 STll>Y PI-82 (28A0 lllll DATA Cll.LECTI()I DE9:RIPTI()I AND CODE tUIBER: TI>-9.2 VERIFICATI()I AND \qJDATI()I SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FI-YS-117A ff t(IT IN INY FILE t FI-YS-1178 ff t<<lT IN INY FILE t
It.A EN6If£ERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY lftIT@ CODE B ASSES9£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A12M3 REQUIRED DISPlAYS AND INDICATI~ ARE MISSIN6 FIOI CR. EN6 I -5 85/28/85 tUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESP(N;E. HI PD.EN DESCRIPTI0N1
'l.l YISIA. DISPlAYS IWD INDICATION r£CESSARY TO IEE'T TASK REIIJIRBENTS AR£ l<<JT PRESENT IN CR.
17N PARAGRM-1 rul8£R: 6,1,1,1.A 6.5.1,1.B 6.5.1.1.£ 6.5.4.1.6 SOOGESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE CR WITH TI£ VISI.R. DISPLAY /INDICATION LISTED. HI DISPOSITI~: INST/:U INDICATOR LIGHTS !ACTlR..l &FLIII INDICATI~
- DATA ro.LECTION DESCRIPTill4 AND CODE rDIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE*!RKS: PI-n-S7. t() HI SAFffi IfllPORT DUE TO WW BACKUP AVAILABILITY ITEMS INYll.\el: - IIARK r<<.JMBER LOCATION COIPOf£NT rM: SYST91 SUBSYSTEM FEED RES BYP H t()T IN INV FIL£ t
ttn1AN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT 0 CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVlEW DATE 20A02Wt REQUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATI~ ARE fllISSINS FRCJ!ll CR. EN6 I -5 03/17/86
~ ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN OP RESPONSE. Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: VISUAL DISPLAY /INDICATION NECESSARY TO MEET TASK REOOIREl£NTS rm PRES£NT Ik CR. 07"9 PARAGRAPH NUl'.BER: 6.1.1. l,A 6.5.1.1,B 6._S.1.1. E 6.5.4.1,G SUSSESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE CR WITH VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION LISTED*
- DISPOSITION:
LOW CONSEQ'JENCE OF ERROR DUE TO SECONDARY INDICATIONS ~PARAMETER STATUS. INSTAL L INDIC LTS FOR ACTUAL W STATUS DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N'J~R: TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND_ VALIDATION TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REfilARl<S: PI-77-58 ITOO INVOLVED: MARK N.MBER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII DECAY 1£AT H rm IN INV FI_LE f tCV-fllS-204 CAB213 PROCESS CONTROLLER MAIN STEA/II SYSTBI
~ ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 03117/BS SURRY ~ IT 0 CODE A ASSESS1ti£NT ~T REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~S REGUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS ARE MISSING FROM CR. I -1 03/17/Bc IOIAN ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN IJ) RESPONSE. tff PROBL9! DESCRIPTION: VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION NECESSARY TO MEET TASK RElhJIREl!IENTS NOT PRESENT IN CR. 0790 PARAGRAl1H NUMBER: 6.1.1.1.A 6.S.1.1.B 6;5.1.1.E 6.S.4.1.G SU66ESTED BACl<FlT: PROVIDE CR WITH VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION LISTED *
- tff DISPOSITION:
DOCUll!ENTED INVOLVING RCS DE-PRESS DUE TO LACK OF INDIC OF W STATUS. PROVIDE POS DIGITAL W POSIT INDIC, RED/BREEN LIGHTS. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUP'.BER: TP- 9. 2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION TP- S.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-n-59. <SEE PI-20 (22A03206)). IIDIS INVOLVED: LOCATION COJIIPONENT NA,!£ SYSTEI'! SUBSYSTEfl: PCV-2455A DAA121 PROCESS CONTROLLER REACTOR COOLANT <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRJ SYS PCV-24SSB DAA122 PROCESS CONTROLLER REACTOR COOLANT (PRil'IARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRZR SPRAY V H t<<JT IN INV FILE
- ttJMN EN6INEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86
- ~
l£D NO TITLE
. SURRY ~IT 0 CODE ~
REQUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS ARE 1IIISS1t<<i FRQIII CR. RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESS~..Ni STATUS I -3 LAS~ REVIEW DP.TE 03/17/86 ti.MN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN O' RESPCHiE. fff PRO~ DESCRIPTION: VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION t£CESSARY TO MEET TASI{ REOUIREJIIENTS NOT PRESENT IN CR. 8700 PAROORAPH UBER: 6.1,1,1,A 6.5.1,1,B 6~5.1, l,E 6.5.4.1.6 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE CR WITH VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION LISTED, .fff DISPOSITION: PROVIDE INDIC lllTSIDE CHIT, IDEALl.Y IN CR O!ULTIPLEX TO P-250). DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N!JllBER: TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP- 5~1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-77-68 IID!S INVOLVED: LOCATION COJIIPONENT NAPIE SYSTE~ SUBSYSTEJII PRI SYS W H NOT IN INV FILE t
EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 tlJll'.AN SURRY UNIT 0 CODE B ASSESS!'IENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A02048 POOR DISPLAY LOCATION ENS II -6 03/17/86 KJIAN ERROR: DELAY IN LOCATING DISPLAY:- EFFECT IS MINIMIZED DUE TO PROPE R COLOR !HIDING. Hf PROBt.91 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS ARE NOT LOCATED WITH OTl£R RCS COIIPONENTS. 07"9 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.8.1.1.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: r<<:JNE REOOIRED. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-29 (20A01136). ICC UPSRADE TO ADDRESS,
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP- 9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REfilARl<S: VI-42-2 I TEl4S INVO..VED: LOCATION COf!IPONENT NAr.E SYSTEfl! SUBSYSTEM CORE COOL~ ff NOT IN INV FILE t
lfJ,.:\N ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPDRr 03/17/86 SURRY UNIT 0 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
- - -----------~--------- -----
20A02049 REWIRED DISPUlYS AND INDICATI~ ARE IUSSIM3 Fio. CR. NONE I -5 03/17/86 11.R ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN (Jl RESPONSE.
./
fff PROBI..EII DESCRIPTIO'.:
~ YIS!Ji.. DISPLAYS~ INDICATION NECESSARY TO MEET TASK REGUIREIENTS ARE NOT PRESENT IN 1
CR. 1700 PARAGRAPH NU.mER: 6.1, l,l,A 6.5.1.1.B 6,5. l. l,E 6.5.4.1.6 SU66ESTED ruo<FIT: PROVIDE CR WITH THE VISUAL DISPLAY AND INDICATIONS LISTED.
- fff DISPOSITION:
EXISTING INDICATION IS CORRECT. IF LEAK OFF FLOW 60£S BEYOND EXISTING RANGE, RCP AND PLANT IS SHUTDOWN. THE LOSS OF 1 OR ALL RCPS OOES NOT PREVENT SAFE SHUTDOWN
- r<<J ~TION REQUIRED.
OOTA ro..LECTION DESCRIPTION ~D CODE NUl'.BER: TP- 9.2 Y£RIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RElilRKS: PI-77-65 ITOO INVOLVED: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEI'! RCP SE~ LKO H NJT IN INV FILE f
~ ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 13/17/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY ~IT 0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSES~ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW
~TE 2A28S0 REQUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIIM IIIISSING FRQIII CR. ENS II -6 13/17/86 tUIAN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN OP RE~. lff PROB!.91 DESCRIPTION:
~L VISUAL DISPLAYS AND INDICATION NECESSARY TO IEET TASK REGUIREll!ENTS ARE MJT PRESENT IN n£ CR.
1780 PARASRAPH NIMBER: 6.1.1.1.A 6.5.1, 1,B 6.-S, l, l,E 6.5.4.1,6 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE CR WITH THE VISUAL DISPLAY AND INDICATIONS LISTED*
- fff DISPOSITION:
FOR FUii CONTOLLERS LISTED ADD DIGITAL INDICATION. (RED/6R:EN LIGHTS). DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE ~BER: TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP- S.l DISPLAYS SURVEY REIIIARl<S: PI-77-3
!TOO INVOLVED:
11'.!RK fO!BER LOCATION CQIIIPOHENT NA!IIE SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll ICV-1184 RAA.326 PROCESS CONTROLLER CHE/IIICAL AND VOLl.JIIIE CONTROL SYSTEM ICV-11"5 ff NOT IN INV FILE t 1£\1-1110 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PCV-245SB DAA122 PROCESS CONTROLLER REACTOR COOLANT (PRI~RY LOOP, PWRJ SYS TCV-CC-203 DAA128 PROCESS CONTROLLER COMPONENT COOLING SYSTE~
H.M~ ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY 1.Jm 0 CODE C ASSESS1'1ENT LAST REVIEw H£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS . DATE 20A82051 REllUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS AISSING FRO!! THE CR. II -7 03/17/86 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJl RESPONSE. fff . PROBlEJII DESCRIPTION: ALL VISUAL DISPLAYS AND INDICATION NECESSARY TO lilEET TASK REQUIR91ENTS ARE NOT PRESENT IN HE CR. 8700 PARAGRAPH fOIBER: 6.1.1.1.A 6.5.1.1,B 6,5.1.1.E
- 6. 5. 4.1. 6 SUSSESTED BOCKFIT:
PROVIDE CR WITH THE VISIJli. DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS LISTED*
- fff DISPOSITION:
FOR FLl)l CONTROLLERS LISTED ADD DI6ITAL IF FLOW INDICATION IS PRESENT, ANALOG IF r()T, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl'IBER: TP- 9. 2 VERIFICAi!(r,i AND VALIDATION TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-n-4 ITEfllS I NVOI..VED : LOCATION COP'PONENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTE!!: FCV-FW-255A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FCV-FW-255B ff NOT IN INV FILE t Fcv-FW-255C ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 tCV-2137 DAA125 PROCESS CONTROLLER CHE!*llCA:... AND VOUJIE CONTROL SYSTEl'I LETDOWN
HJIIIAN ENSINEERING DISC~Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY OOITI CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAi2l52 AEllJIRED DISPLAYS MISSING FRIii CR. ENG II -6 17/15/85 IUIAN ERROR: DEi.AV/ERROR IN CP RESPCNiE. fff PROBLEJI DESCRIPTI~:
. YISIA. DISPS tECESSARY TO IEET IU TASK REllJIREEITS FOINlfflll, AIMJRIII, al£R6 CPERATICNi t()T PROVIDED IN CR.
1780 PARAGRAPH NI.MBER: 6.5.1, 1,B SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: PROVIDE TI£ YISIA. DI!RAYS r£ED£D BY CR OPERATORS LISTED ON THE ATIACt£D SHEET. fff DISPOSITI~: REFER TO PI-77-1 !21BA02205) *
- DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE N.MBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YAI.IDATION TP-1.7 IIIAINTAINABILITV SURVEY REMARKS: PH06 ITEMS INYClYED: MRK MJIBER LOCATION CCJIIIPONENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM DI!RAYS H N'.IT IN INY FILE t
tOAI EN3INEERIN3 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY ~ITi CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NI TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Ai2t9i DI5PLAYS TOO LIii ~ PAhE..S. CDR.T VJ,/i7/85
.._ ERROR:
READIN3 ERRORS LEADING TO ERRORS IN CONTRri. ACTIVATIOH. Hf PROBl.9I DESCRIPTI~:
~ OBSCURE DISPLAYS PIXED LOW~ VERTial. ~ , !PERATORS KJST WW ACROSS~
RDS FOR READINGS. 17Nl PARA61ti¥>H f(JIIIBER: 6.1.2.5.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: l()VE DISPLAYS TO HI6t£R POSIT!~ FOR EASY READirE OR REPOSITIOO DESK/cnEO..E HIHR FOR I() NITORING. 1H DISPOSITION: DELETE-DISPLAYS ARE AOOVE 41
- AND ARE t(JT FREOOENTLY USED*
- DATA CCllECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NI.JIBER:
TP-1.2 ANTH~RICS SURVEY REJIIARKS: Pl-28-5/7 ITEJIIS INVll.VED:
~RK tOIBER LOCATION COIPCN:NT fM: SYSTEJII SUBSYSTBI CTNT PR PROT ff f(]T IN INV FILE t PRZ LVL ~RD H NIT IN INV FILE 1.
~ OOlNEERING DISCREPiM:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNITI CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSES9!ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 21A112111 ArftKIATOR TILE OORAVING TOO 9Rl EN6 II -5 '7/11/85 tlNIN ERROR1 D£LAY AND/OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPONSE TO ~IATORS fff PROllEJI DESCRIPTI~:
Df\lW:TERS ON TILES ARE TOO SM.l. TO BE READ FR(JII CP' S DESK AND CCMl(LES
- 07N PARAGRAPH l'OIBER:
6, l, l, 3. A 6. 3. 3. 5. A. 1 S006ESTED BACKFIT: IraEASE ~TERS TO REOOIRED SIZE PER NJREH710 fff DISPOSITI~: PERF DET ANN STUDY, IN:L SIZE OF OORAYING, PROPER TITLEARRA&, ETC. SEE PI-84 (21A82115) 1 C-9 (22Ai2906), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JNBER: TP-1, 1 ..:JRKSPACE SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS: PI-Z.. INTE6RATE WITH ALL OTl£R ANN..NCIATOR 1£DS, ITEMS INVCl.YED:
*IRK roBER LOCATION CDIPOIENT 1M SYST8' SUBSYSTEM lWD TILES H f()T IN INV FILE t
KA EN;INEERING DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- HED Ill TITLE SURRY ~ITI CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28Al2112 A,NKIATOR TILE ILLIMINATIIWS INDICATES IIIN. CCN>ITIONS. ENG II -5 11/17/85 11.R ERROR:
INCREASES PROBABILITY OF OPERATOR lilISSINS IJIIPORTANT SYS. /EllJ 1 IP. STATUS I~O. FRCJI DISCRIMINABILJ'TY ERRORS. lff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: TILES ARE ILWUNATED UNDER t()RIA. ~ITIONS INSTEAD OF CM.Y IN llJT:..0:-T~ CONDITIO NS. 8780 PARAGRAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.3.3.2.E SUGGESTED BAO<F IT: EV~TE C~ING TO "DARK PANEL" CON:EPT FOR Arft.lNCIATOR SYSTEM. lff DISPOSITION: rnu.ATE LISTED~ FOR ENGINEERirE/LIEIC ~ S*
- DATA 00.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-3.1 Aff<<JNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW REAA~S: PI-47. RE-BWJATE AFTER UP6RADES. IIDIS INYCl\B: NARK NIJIBER . LOCATION IDIPCIIENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CB DELTA WIX. ff t<<JT IN INY FILE 1 CC HDR FL LO ff IIIT IN INV FILE 1 DISC VAC PRI ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 HI \US ATP ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 UO CCIND LO ff t()T IN INV FILE* NIS SOORCE ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 NJ ROT T-SCN ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 RHR L~ FL~ ff IIIT IN INV FILE* SB¥.. C-P OFF ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
- SR HI-F l:l.KD ff r<<JT IN INV FILE*
lt.M EN3INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT e2/28/86
- TITLE SURRY 1.NIT0 COD A 28A82113 ~IATOR PUl:ElENT l<<IT CCHiISTENT IIETIEEN lWITS.
RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSIOT STATUS JI -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 17/11/85 tUAf ERROR:
.DELAY IN R£COONIZIN6 ANt.N:lATOR.
"* PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~:
~IATOR TILE ~/rmr<<:LATURE MJT COOISTENT BETW£N LWITS.
87"8 PARAGRAPH NlJIIBER: 6.8. 2* .\. A SOOGESTED BACKFIT: STIMARDIZE PUlCBENT AND NCl1ENCLATURE FOR ~IATOR SYSTEJII.
"* DISPOSITI~:
REFER TO PI-85 (28Ae2186l AND PI-2 (28A02181l ANU<<:IATOR STUDY *
- DATA CTl..LECTIOO DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE l'Ol!ER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~I~Tl~ TP-3.1 Att<<.NICIATOR SYSIDIS REVIEW
~Rl<S:
E-11. IIDIS INVll.',£I>:
~Rf< NUMBER L.OCATIOO CCIIIPOf£NT NAIi£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII ff f()T IN INV FILE t
~ EN6INEERIN6 DI~~ REPORT 12/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNITI! CO~
RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28Al21M ANN TILES NOT CODED FOR 1DENTIFYIN3 EXTENDED DURATICN ILLIJIINATICN CDRT 17/11/85 llR ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN (J) RESPONSE. fH PROIUJII DESCRIPTICN: TILES NOT CODED FOR IDIN3 lf£N TILE fll.lST B£ IWJIINATED FOR l>>4 EXTENDED DURATION DURIN6 NO RM. lJ>ERATICN. 17li!I PARAS~ NUIU3£R1 6.3.3.2.F SU66ESTED BOO<FIT: DETEfilllitE IF CODIN6 WILL EtffKE RECOONITICN OF ~ SYS/EOOIP, IF SO, PROVIDE. ENSURE ADIi PROC TO LOG *CN* TILE fff DISPOSITICN: DELETE - ANttKIATOR RESPONSE LOG PROVIDES ADMIN CONTROL
- DATA cw.ECTICN DESCRIPTICN AND CODE IUIBER:
TP-3,1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEfllS REVIEW REJIIA~S: PI-48 ITEJIIS INYCl.VED: MRI< l'UIBER LOCATION COflPCl1ENT NAI£ SYSTEM SUBSYST91 INN SYSTEM ff NOT IN INV FILE*
IOAI EIEINEERitf3 DISCREPANCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY Ltma COIi: ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCIEIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A82105 IU TILE LEGENDS Itm6ISTIWT WITH Oll£R LABELING IN CR, CDRT 05/28/85 If.MAN ERROR: MY CAUSE DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR RESP!HlE. PRO!ll.EN DESCRIPTI~: 1M. TILE LEGEND ABBREVIATIOHS/ACROO'NS DIFFER FROII ~IN6/ABBR£VIATICINS FOR ASSOCIATED CIMRO..S/DISPUIYS. 1780 PARAGRAPH ttJ..aER: 6.3.3.4,D SUGGESTED .BAO<FIT: R£I.ABa IMUCIATOR TILE L£6£NDS USING A[)ll!I
N. PROCEDURE
SFOR USE OF l¥>PROV£D ABBREVIATIONS/ ACFOMS.
'** DISPOSITION:
DEFER PENDING LABEi.INS SURVEY iwD DEVELll>IENT OF STiN>ARDIZED LABELING LIST*
- DATA Ctll.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE PUIBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS iwD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-3.1 AIWJNICIATOR SYSTB!S RB'IEW REMRKS: PI.-84 ITEMS INVCl.VED: MRK MJIIIBER LOCATION CONJOtNT r9E SYST£111 SIJBSYSTBI ANt1M SYST£111 H t()T IN INV FIL£ t
OOirEERING DISCREPAPCY REPORT HJIAN 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2116 -,<<:IATOR TILE LEGENDS INI6LOJS/TOO l<<lRDY. EN6 II -5 05/28/85 ttR ERROR1 MY a.JSE DELAY/ERRORS IN CPERATOR RESPONSE. 1H PROBl.91 IIESCRIPTICli: ANUCIATOR TILE LESENDS ARE AIIIBlSI.OOS ~ TOO l<<lRDY. e7ela PARAGRAPH NlMBER:
- 6. 3. 3. 4. A S006ESTED BACKFIT:
PERFOR!II ANN. STUDY TO DETERMINE CORRECT l<<JRDihS FOR RAPID/~RATE IDPR9£NSION If' TILE Pl ESSA6ES. RELABEL TILES Hf DISPOSITION: DEFER. aill.lJlTED AS l<<:IRST-cASE SCENARIO. t£ED TO LOOK ATEA TILE OO!ER DETAILED A
,... STANDARDIZATIOO/lJlGRADE PROO*
DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIIIBER: TP-3,1 ~ICIATOR SYSTBIS REVIEW TP-£, 1 UUl8.S AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
~RKS:
PI-85, SEE PI-2(21A82101l,PI-84(21A82185>,C-9(22Al2986), ITBIS INV<l."9: MRI< fUIBER UlCATION C()l)(>>£NT rAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM AMO SYSTEM H r<<lT IN INV FILE f
tlJNAN 96INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 12/28/86
- l£D t<<) TITLE SURRY IMITII CODE A RESP(IEIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A82119 LACK CF GRCU>It<<; BY SYSTEM FIKTI~ EN6 II -5 f/6/17/85
- tUIW ERROR:
DELAY IN RELATIN6 ~IATOR TO SYSTEM. Hf
- PROll.EJI DESCRIPTICli:
SUBJECT TILES ARE f(l1' RELATED TO OTl£R TILES IN OOX. 07118 PARAGIWIH NlJIBER:
- 6. 8.1.1. B SOOGESTED BACKFIT:
RELOCATE TILES TO f:R>RCPRIATE SRW>S. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-2 FOR COOIDERATI~ DURIN6 IMIKIATOR STUDYC28Al2101l
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-9. 2 VERIFlCATI~ AND Wl.IDATIOH RBIARl<S: E-38 I TENS INYO..\JED: MARK IUIBER LOCATI~ CIJl>OfENT rM SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM N OOX A ff t<<)T IN INV FILE 1 6-1 Cl.WIT 2l ff tm IN INV FILE 1 6-5 (UNIT 1> ff t<<)T IN INV FILE 1 H-1 (I.WIT 2> ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 H-5 (UNIT 1> ff r4JT IN INY FILE I
llMil EtEINEERINi DISCREPA.'<<:V REPORT 02/28/86 SURRV ~ IT0 CODE ASSESSfENT ~T REVIEW HED r<<I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A82124 Arft.N:IATOR TILE FAILURE IS r<<IT IIIEDIATaY APPARENT TO CPS. COlll.T 17/11/85 11M ERROR: DWlY/ERROR IN CP RESP(H;E. / Hf PROa..EN DESCRIPTI~: PIDl>T RECOONITI~ IF OJT-oF-SERVICE TILES t()T .DESI6fED INTO AHN SVS. CPS AWARE CN..V IF IIIR STICKERS AFFIXED, 0780 PAIIA6RAPH ttlfl!BER: 6.3.3.3.E SU66£STED BACKFIT: DETERl'IINE FEATURE TO aff:WCE REC06NITI~ IF FAILED TILES& IlilPLEIENT, ENSURE FU8£R/AUD AL
~/~ CARD COMP FAILS fH DISPOSITION:
ADl!IN PROC REDUIRES TEST OF ANH SVS ONCE PER SHIFT - fllAINTENllCE TASS ARE~ ED F!llOWIIE ID IF FAILED* DATA COL.l.£CTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE rt.lf!BER:
~3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSIDIS REVIEW REfllAllt<S:
PI-49
!TOO INVO..VED:
fllARK NIJIBER LOCATI~ Ct)l)(>>OT NAflE SVSTEIII SUBSYSTEIII ANH SYSTEIII H r<<JT IN I,t,J FILE t
tU¥lH ENiitEERI"6 DISC~Y REPORT 12/28/86
- HED t<<l TITLE SURRY LNIT0 CODE A RESPOEIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2'Al2125 t<<l AUDITORY SI6NAI. PRIORITY CODIFE OF INUCIATOR ll.ARMS. ENS II -5 97/11/85 tlR ERROR:
DELAY IN CP RE~ Hf PROa91 DESCRIPTION: t() AUD SI!Hl. PRIORITY CODING USED FOR It<<DIIN6 ll.ARMS. OPS r.Arf()T DIFFERENTIATE lllRE Il'PO RTANT FIOI LESS. 1780 PARAGRAPH NOOlER: 6,3, l,4,A, 1 6.3.1.4.A.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE AUDITORY SISNll. PRIORITY CODIFE CAPABILITIES FOR ANN SYS ll.AR"6 IN ACCORDANC£ W/ 6
, 2, 2. 3A-E OF 07N.
Hf DISPOSITI~: REFER TO ANMH:IATOR STUDY PER Pl-2 12'At2101> ~ Pl-85128A82116) *
- DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER:
TP-3,1 ANNlJIICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW
~RKS:
. PI-52 ITOO UMl.VED: -
MRK ftJIIIBER LOCATION co,,s>()tENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ANN SYST91 H t<<JT IN INV FILE*
ttR ENiINEERifE DISCREPAPCV REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY LWIT8 CODE AB ASSESSf£HT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESP()eIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Aa2211 S<aE Rlr&S Il'A>PID>RIATE, IEEI) NARROI RAN6ES EXPANDED ENS I -3 12/15/85 ltJIAI ERROR:
~V OR ERROR IN CJIERATOR RESPCHlES lff PRO!lEJI DESCRIPTION:
SOU RAN3ES ARE TOO WIDE FOR l!AXIU DISPLAYED VIUES, NEED ~RR!M RA& TO MAINTAIN EOOI PtENT PDlERLV 1780 PA~RM-1 NtNER: 6.5.1.2,D.1 6,5,1,2,D,2 SUOOESTED BACl<F lT: ew:k..~TE FOR APPRl))RlATENESS OF SC:ll.E RAf&:S, REPLACE WITH WIDE RAH6E SC:ll.ES lff DISPOSITICli: CIJM:RT*TO Llr£AA SOU &-488 SC:Flil - JIIAJOR INCREIENTS OF 58, P!Ir(JR INCR90TS OF s. DATA cru..ECTION DESCRIPTION~ COD£ riJf!BER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-71-5. ITEJIIS INVCl.l,{J): MARK NUMBER LOCATION COIPOtENT l'M: SVSIDI SUBSYSIDI FI-6W-1N PABe55 METER ~ ~TE RADIIKTIVE SYSIDI
lt.M ENUNEERIN6 DISC~ REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ASS£SS,ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A022l2 SQl.E IMiES TOO NARD, WIDE RIN3E INDICATiflf l<<:rT PROVIDED. II ~ 11/11/85 ltJR4 ERROR: PIAY ~ DELAY /ERRORS IN CPERATOR RE~ DUE TO INABILITY TO VERIFY/OITOR SYSTEJI/EGUIPIENT STATUS. Hf PAOflDI DESCRIPTiflf: SC$US RAN3ES TOO ~RROW FOR PIAXIIU DISPLAYED WUES. SlPP0RTIN6 WIDE ~ INSTRUIENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 8780 PARASRAPH IU!BER: 6.5.1.2.D.3 SU66ESTED BAD<F IT: PROVIDE: WIDE-RANJE INSTR1.JENTATION TO SUPPORT IETER INDICATil>>t. fff DISPOSITION: OR&: sati TO READ 28"-30" ~
- DATA ro..LECTiflf DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-5. 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY R91A~S: PI-72-2. ITEJIIS INYCl.IS: PIARI< IUIBER L.OCATIIJI C(N)()t,ENT rM: SYS1D SUBSYSTEM CHDNSER VAC ff r(JT IN IHV FILE f
tlMlN EhSINEERitE DISCREPAJCY REPORT B2/28/86 SURRY LNITIJ CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE AE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28All22l3 IETERS DO NIT FAIL IFF-sal.E. C(N)LT 88/87/85 tt.MH ERROR: MY~ IPERATOR RESPCNlE ERRORS DUE TO INABILITY TO DETER NII'£ Pt.ANT STATUS. fff PIIDSLEJII DESCRIPTic>>I: SOIE METERS FAIL IN CENTER OF ~ IN ZERO POSITION. TRS LOOSE POER, P8f FAILS. 07N PARAGRAPti NIJIUIER: 6.5.1.1.F SOOGESTED BACl<FIT: ADJUST/REl>Ln .iETERS THAT DO t()T FAIL IN lf'F-sn.E. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO P.9.2-15 (22A82857)
- DATA cru..ECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE OBER:
T~5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RBIARKS: PI-73 ITEMS UMl.VED: MRK NJIIIBER LOCATION COIIPOrENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IIETERS H t()T IN INV FILE* I
tUIAN EtEINEERIN6 DI~Y REPORT 92/28/86 SURRY IMITI CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED l'<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2284 SOI.£ RANES TOO NARRIJI, WIDE !REE INDICATION NOT PROVIDED. EN6 II~ 12/14/85 lUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJ> RESPCNE. Hf PROII.EJI DESCRIPTION: SCll.ES RANES :roo ~RROW FOR fllAXIU DISPLAYED VAl.l£S. 51.PPORTINS WIDE~ INSTRlJENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 8710 PARAGRAPH tO'.BER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. D. 3
!lJGGESTED BACl<FIT:
PROVIDE WIDE-Mt& INSTRIJIEHTATION TO SUPPORT IETER INDICATION. 1+1 DISPOSITION: EtE STUDY TO DETEJIIIrE D.E REllJIRaENT. COORDI~TE WITH PI-19-4 (2t.J13828) *
- DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIIBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATIOf RBARKS: PI-72-3. ITEM INV!l.VED: BO~ REC. PDT-PRESSURE ITEMS INVCl.VED: IIIARK NMB£R LOCATION IDIPOrENT NAIi£ SYSTal SUBSYSTEJII B RCVRY PDT H ~T IN INV FILE t
tUIAH EtEir£ERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y R£PORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITI CODE A ASS£SS1ENT LAST. REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RESPOOIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAl22t5 saLE RANES TOO NARD, WIDE RIM£ INDICATICW r<<lT PROVIDED. EN6 I -1 11/38/86 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RE~
/
fff PROllLBI DESCRIPTI~:
saus RAt<>c REIIIARKS:
PI-72-4. lTEJII INVCl.VED: INCOR£ T ~
ITEJIIS INYll.'JED:
~RK fUIBER LOCATION COl>ONENT NAPE SYSTBI SUBSYSTEJII INCORE TIC H r<<lT IN INY FIL£ t
It.A OOINEERHE DISCREPArCY REPORT "2/28/86 SURRY LWIT8 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCJEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A2286 SCALE !REES TOO NARRCJI, WIDE RiwsE INDICATI~ P<<IT PROVIDED. 12/19/85 tU!AN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RE~. fH PRCIILEJII DESCRIPTION: SCll.ES RAH6£S TOO NARROW FOR PIAXIIUI DISPLAYED VALL£S. SlPPORTitE WIDE RA& INSTIMENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 87"8 PA~RAPH NJl'IBER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. D. 3 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:
PROVIDE WIDE-RAJ&: INSTRUl£NTATION TO SUPPORT IETER INDICATION. fH DISPOSITION: HI-LO. PIETERS KWE RECENTLY BEEN ADDED SO Tt'AT RAN;ES ARE APPROPRIATE FOR 111Arn1u Pl FLCM mEY r<<l LONSER PES OOT. l DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M.MBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION REPIARKS: PI-72-8. ITEPI INVil..VED: CNTIIWT PURSE - VENT FLOW ITEMS IN'4VED: -
~RK rtllilBER LOCATION ~ T NAi1IE SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEPI CTPIT PURSE H NJT IN INV FILE t
ltNlN ENHN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 82/28/86
- HED t() TITLE SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RESP06IBIL1TY ASSESMNT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A82287 SCALE RAN6ES TOO ~R(M, WIDE RANGE INDICATION t()T PROVIDED. EN6 II -7 12/14/85 tUIAN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. fH Pm.EM DESCRIPTION: D.E 11Af&S TOO ~RROW FOR flAXIIUI DISPLAYED VAUES. SlPPORTINS WIDE RA.'ETE INSTRlJ!ENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 1710 PARAS~ N.JMBER:
- 6. 5.1,2.D. 3 SUGGESTED BACKF IT:
PR0VID£ WIDE-~ INSTRUl!ENTATION TO SUPPORT METER INDICATION.
*'* DISP0SITill4:
ORE DISPtAY TO BE 18' - 35'
- DATA CO-LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.MBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATICft REJIRRKS: PI-72-9. ITEMS INVCl.VEih MRK tUIBER LOCATION COIIOfENT ~ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM LT-CW-191 ff r<<JT IN INY FILE t LT-cw-291 ff t(IT IN INV FILE t
tUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPIN:Y REPORT 1!2/28/86 SURRY ~ITi CODE B ASSESSflENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAl22l8 SOU RfHiES TOO NARROW, WIDE RAN6E INDICATim. t<<lT PROVIDED. EN6 II -6 1!2/14/85 tUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPC>>ISE. fH PRDlllBI DESCRIPTitw: SC$¥_ES RAfE£S TOO NARROW FOR flAXIIUI DISPUIYED VIU£S. StJlPORTirE WIDE IR&: INSTRll!ENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 1710 PARAGRAPH NUIIBER:
- 6. 5.1.2. D. 3 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT:
PROVIDE: WIDE-IR&: lNSTRlJIENTATim. TO SUPPORT IIETER INDICATION. fH DISPOSITitw: ADD WR 0-381 GP"- SEE Pl-71-11 (28Al22141
- DATA cw.ECTitw DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE NUMBER:
. TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATltw AND IJALIDATIOC
~RKS:.
PI-72-18. ITENS INY(l.VED: IIAAK MJ&R LOCATION llNlOr£NT NAfilE SYSTEM SUBSYST01 ff NlT IN INY FIL£ t
tlJIAN ENSINt'..ERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 13/17/IIE>
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT 0 CODEC RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIJIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2IA02209 SCALE RiNiES INAPPROPRIATE, NEED NARROW RAl'EES EXPANDED. II -7 13/17/86
~ ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IJl RESPONSE. H+ PROBID DESCRIPTION: SCALE RANGES ARE TOO WIDE FOR MAXIO DISPLAYED YAL.1£S, NEED NARROW RANGE TO ~INTAIN EQUI PIENT PROPER!.. Y*
.1780 PARAGRAPH NJMBER:
6.5.1,2,D.1 6, 5, l, 2, D, 2 SU36ESTED BACKFIT: EVALUATE FOR APPROPRIATENESS OF SCALES RANGES, REPLACE WITH WIDE RANGE SCALES. ff+ DISPOSITION: PRZR PRESS RAtEE IS t<<JW ADEQUATE, SINCE THE RCP TRIP CRITERION IN THE NEW EOPS I S BASED lJmi SUBC00LIN6 MRSINPROVIDED TO THE ICC PIONITOR, RATHER THAN PRZR PRE SS OF 1600 PSIS. NO OCTION RElllIRED. DATA ctllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIBER: TP- 5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP- 9. 2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ RalARl<S: PI-71-7, ENGINEERING PROVIDE EXPANDED SCAt..E. ITEIE INVOLVED: Ill RK NIJIIIBER LOCATION CIJlll)()NENT NA,£ SYSTEJI! SUBSYSTEM PRZR PRESS H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
tlMf ENHNEERIN6 DlSCREPAf<<:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- TITl.£ SURRY ~IT8 CODE B RESPCJEIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2'Al2211 salE IR&S Itf!PPRCPRIATE, t£ED ~RR()I RANSES EXPANDED. EN6 I -2 02/15/85 It.A ERROR1 DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPC>>EE.
1H PROa.91 DESCRIPTill4: SC1E RA&S ARE TOO WIDE FOR PIAXIO DISPl.AYED 'AlES, NEED NARROW RAt& TO PIAINTAIN EOOI PfENT PRCPERLV, 1710 PARAGRAPH rulBER: 6.5,1.2.D,1 6.5.1,2.D.2 SUSSESTED BACKF l T: EYALl.ilTE FOR APPROPRIATEtESS OF SCALE RAIEES, ~ WITH WIDE RANElE SCALES, fff DISPOSITION: NEEDS EXPANDfD SCALE. PUT ON RWST RECORDER. DATA CCLLECTIC* DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER: TP-5. 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 YERIFICATIC* AND ~IDATIO. REMRl<S: PI-71-4. EN6INEERIIE PROVIDE EXPAHDED SCALE. ITEIIS INVll.VED: MAIi< NJIBER LOCATIC* C()IP()ENT NflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CAT LEVEL H r(JT IN INV FIL.£ t
- 1tM OOINEERING DISCREPIM:Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT& CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPC>>cSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2R2211 SOU !REES INAPPR(J)RIATE, l'£ED l'i\RRCM R1MiE EXPANDED, ENS III-7 12/15/85 K.IAI ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESPONSE. 1 Hf PRCIUN DESCRIPTICW: SOU RAr&:S AR£ TOO WIDE FOR IIAXlPUI DISPLAYED~ rEED ~RR{M RAN6c TO ~INTAIN EQUI Pf£NT PRIPERL Y, 171J8 PARAGRAPH NJl!BER: 6.5.1.2.D,1 6,5,1,2,D.2. SU66ESTED BOO<FIT: Ml.UTE FOR APPR0PRIATEt£SS Cf' SOU RA&S. REPUU WITH WIDE RAtfiE sm..ES. Hf DISPOSITICW: ES TO DETERMI1'£ IIIIN-IIAX SI FUJW & DilMiE DlSPlAY ACCORDIN6LY, 00 TO PROVIDE EXP lr-O)ED sau. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTICW AND CODE M.Jl!ER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION REJIIARKS: PI-71-2. ITEMS INYCLVED: II.ARK fUIBER LOCATION IDfflEHT NAME SYSIDI Sl1BSYST9I FT-1-932 ff NJT IN INY FILE t FT-1-9JJ ff NJT IN INV FILE
- FT-l-':161 ff NJT IN INV FILE t FT-1-961 H NlT IN INY FILE*
FT-1-962 ff f()T IN INV FILE t FT-1-963 ff N'.IT IN INY FILE* FT-2-932 ff f()T IN INV FILE* FT-2-9JJ ff f()T IN INV FIL£ t FT-2-968 ff f()T IN INV FIL£ t FT-2-961 ff N'.IT IN INV FILE t FT-2-962 ff f()T IN INV FILE t
IUIAN 96INEERIN6 DI!l:REPAt<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY LNIT8 t£D Ml: 2A2211 ITEJIIS INVll.YED: MAK fUIBER LOCATic>>I CQ!lllOf,ENT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FT-2-963 ff r<<IT IN INY FILE*
~ EhSINEERifE DISCREAAICY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY 1.rme CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESP!MHBILITY STATUS DATE 29A82212 SOU RANES INi¥JPR(1)RIATE, NEED NAARCM RANES EXPiNlED. I -2 V/2./15/85 ti.JAi ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESP06E. lt-f PROll.EN DESCRIPTION:
!m..E RA.EES ARE TOO WIDE FOR IIIAXIIUI DISPLAYED WUES, t££D NARRCM RAfEE TO .w:IINTAIN EOUI PfENT PRCPEll.Y, 1718 PARAGRAPH tUtBER:
6.5.1,2.D,1 6.5.1,2,D,2 SIJ66ESTED ~IT:
~TE FOR APPR£PRIATEt£SS I F ~ RAN3ES, REPLACE WITH NARRCM RA& D..ES. .... DISPOSITION:
R£FER TO HR-6 (22A95886l,
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTICl4 AND CODE UBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATI~ RENARl<S: PI-71-li. ITEJIIS INY!l.\El: IIIARK NIJIIBER L.OCATICl4 <nmENT NAfE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEN ff IClT IN INV FILE 1
II.A ENSINEERitE DISCREPIKY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY 1.NITi CODEC ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE!iPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2BAl2213 ~ RAN6E INAPPRCPRIATE, t£ED NARRCM RAN6ES EXPflilED. III-9 82/15/85
~ ERROii:
DElAY/ERROR IN (I) RESPC>>EE. fff PAOll8I DESCRIPTIIJI:
&AE RAt&:S ARE TOO WIDE FOR JIIAXIO DISPLAYED~ PEED ~RROW RAJ& TO ~INTAIN EDUI Pll£HT PIU>ERL yI 8780 PARAGRAPH N.JfmER:
6.5.I.2.D.l 6.5.1.2.D.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: Ml.~TE FOR APPRCPRIATENESS OF ~ RA&S, REPLAC£ WITH WIDE RAJ&: saus. fff DISPOSITIIJI: r() ACTIIJI REl!JIRED. SOLES ARE APPROPRIATE FOR PARAIETERS DISPLAYED*
- DATA C(UECTIIJI DESCRIPTIIJI AND CODE tulBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 YERIFICATIIJI AND Vll.IDATI(Jj
~RKS:
PI.-71-8. IT9IS INVCl.l.{I): JIIAIIK NlJIBER LOCATIIJI C()R)£NT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII CC HDR FLOW ff f()T IN INV FIL.£ t
ltJIAN ENiINEERIJE DISCIIEPA'<<:Y REPORT W28/86 SURRY 1.1me CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPlEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2214 sal.E IR&S INAPPDRIATE, t£ED ~ RAN6ES EXPANDED. EN6 II~ 12/15/85 ti.NW ERROii: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPINlE. lff PROa.91 1eCRIPTI~1 sal.E MrEE TOO WIDE FOR NAXIU DISPLAYED YAUES, fEED NARRCM RAr&: TO IIAJNTAIN EOOIPfENT PfO!Ell.Y. 17N PARASRMi NJIBER: 6.5.1.2.D.1 6.5.1.2.D.2. SU66£STED BAO<FIT: Ml.~TE FOR APPDRIATE1SS OF !m.E RA&S, REPLftCE WITH WIDE RAN6ES SCIUS. lff DISPOSITI~: ADO LlJEAR 19-300 SPIO FOR CHAS & LD*
- DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-5.1 DISPUIYS SU1!V£Y TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ AND YALIDATIIJI REIIARKS: Pl-71-11. IT91S INVa.*,gh IIARK tOIBER LOCATillf C(Nl()ENT NAIE SYSTEJII CHil6Iff3 FWl H t<<>T IN INY FILE I I
tlJlfAH ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORi B3/17i86 SURRY ~IT 0 CODE B ASSESSIIIENT LAST *REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A82215 SCALE RANGE INAPPR(J)RIATE, tEED NARR(lj ~ EXPANDED. ENS I -2 03/17/86. 1tM ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJ) RESPONSE. H4 PROBI..Efl DESCRIPTION: S!AE RANGE TOO WIDE FOR ~XIIUI DISPLAYED VAU£S, NEED NARROW RAN6E TO ~INTAIN EOOIPPIENT PRCJJERLY; 1780 PARAGRAPH NJPIBER: 6.5.1.2.0.1 6.5.1.2,D.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: EVALUATE FOR APPROPRIATENESS OF SCALE RANSES, REPLACE WITH WIDE RANGE SCALES. . DISPOSITION:
- ~RI< SCALE WITH TECH. SPEC. AND ALA8" Lli'!ITS.
DATA ro.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl4BER: TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP- 9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION
~Rl<S:
PI-71-12. ITEJIIS INW..VED: LOCATION COffl)()NENT NA,!£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEl'l IIAST H t<<JT IN INV FILE f
~ EtfiINEERirE DISCREPAICY REPORT 12/28/86
- HED 00 2A2216 5al.E RAtEE I!AlPRCPRIATE, PEED TITLE SURRY 1.Jml CODE A NARR(M ~ EXM'IDEO.
RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSfllEHT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 82/15/85. KR ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJl ~ . i
*" PROBWI DESCRIPTI~:
SCU RAMlE TOO WIDE FOR fllAXIU DISPLAYED VAL1£S, r£ED NARRtM ~ TO ~INTAIN EOOIPfENT PRCPERLY. 1780 PARASRM-i rol&R: 6.5.1.2.0.1 6.5.1.2.0.2. SU66£STED BAD<FIT: EVIUJ'.lTE FOR APPRCPRIATENESS Cf' 5aU RAtt3E, REPLln WITH WIDE ~ scaE.
*" DISPOSITI~:
RESCU MTR 8-581 6PPl - WEAR IF<<:RE1£NTS - 11 SPl'I *
- DATA ro..t.ECTIC.. DESCRIPTIC.. AND CODE UBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATI()j REfl!ARl<S: PI-71-14. IIDIS INVOLVED:
~RI< NUPIBER LOCATION CCJIIIPOENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IFW FLlll H ~T IN INV FILE *
~ EN;ItEERitli DISC~ REPORT 82/28/86
- 28Al2217 sea£~ INAPPRCPRIATE, IEED NARROil TITLE SURRY ~ITI CODE A
~ EXMIDEI>,
RE~IBILITY ENS ASSESSIENT STATUS II -S LAST REVIEW DATE 12/15/85 tlJllN ERROR: DWIY/ERAOR IN IP RESP!J$E.
/
fff PROa.EJII DESCRIPTI~: sm..£ RAtliES ARE TOO WIDE FOR MXIIUI DISPLAYED ~.l£S, r£ED ~RRCM RANS£ TO MINTAIN EllJI PfENT PRIPERLY 8780 PARAGRAPH tf.JIBER: 6.S.1,2,D.1 6.S.1.2,D.2 SU66£STED BAD<FIT: EVAL~TE FOR APPROPRIATEtESS Cf SC&L£ RAtEES, REPUn: WITH WIDE~ saus. 11:1 DISPOSITION: PROVIDE BAND FOR laEPTABLE IPERATitli AAr&: *
- DATA CD..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE fUIBER:
TP-S.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-S.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IIIATI(>>j
~Rl<S:
PI-71-17. IIDIS INVO..VED: MRI< ttJIIIBER LOCATI~ C(lfl(MNT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM SI OCClM PR ** f(IT IN INV FIL.£ f
ltll'!AN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY ~IT @ CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVlEw l£D I'() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A2218 SCALE~ INAPPROPRIATE, NEED NARRCAii ~ EXPANDED. ENS II -7 03/17/86 tlWlN ERROR:
.DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESPONSE.
lff PROEl.81 .DESCRIPTION: SCALE RANGES ARE TOO WIDE FOR ~XIU DISPLAYED IJALI.ES, r£ED ~RROW RANGE TO ~INTAIN EQUI MNT PR(J)ERL. Y. 1780 PARAGRAPH N.lf!BER: 6.5.1,2.D.1 6.5.1,2,D,2 Sl66ESTED M:KFIT: EVALUATE FOR APPROPRIATENESS OF SCALE RANGES, REPLACE WITH WIDE RANGE SCALES. DISPOSITION:
- RESC~E l!ID RAtEE PRESS l'ITR (0-30 PSIAl DATA CO!..LECTICN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUP:~R:
TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATICJ1 RE~RKS: Pl-71-18. ITEMS INVQ.VED: LOCATION COPPONENT NAPlE SYST£ll! SUBSYST£ll! CNTIIINT WR PR HNOT IN INV FILE t
IUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISC~ REPORT 12/28/86
- 29A82219 SCALE RANGE TITLE SURRY ~ITI lllDE A INAPPRO>RIATE, tEED PIIRROI RAN6E EXPINlEO.
RESPC*SIBILITY IO£ A$ESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 12/19/85 ti.A ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. fff PROBID DESCRIPTION: saLE RA.tEES ARE TOO WIDE FOR MXIO DISPLAYED wu.ES, IEED ~RROW IIAf&: TO ,IIINTAIN EOOI PtENT PRIJlERI.. Y. 1710 PARASRM-1 IUIBER: 6,5,1.2.D.1 6.5.1.2.D.2 SU66ESTED BIO<FIT: EVIUi\TE FOR APPRCPRIATENESS OF SCALE RA.tEES, REPLAC£ WITH WIDE RArEE saus. fff DISPOSITION: HI-LOW ,ETERS ~ RECENTLY BEEN ADDED A.IJE WITH ATHIRD CPERATOR TO KJNITOR TH EJI. RANGES ARE to. APPRCPRIATE*
- DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION IN> CODE NJIBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION IN> VALIDATION REMRKS: PI-71-16, ITEJIS INVOL\JED: MRK NUPIBER LOCATION COIJOrENT fflfllE SVSTEJI SUBSVSTEJI CTIIT PRS VNT , ff NOT IN INV FILE t
~ ENiINEERINS DISCREPArf:{ REPORT 12/28/86 TITLE SURRY Lt4ITI aJDE B RESP(IE18ILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28Al2228 Ifll>RIJ)ER ~ ML TIPLIER/~IT 6RADUATICl6. 11/31/86 tUIAN ERROR:
INTERPWITION ERRORS. READINS ERRORS. Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: l.t4IT SRADUATIONS, AS A FOCTION CF SCILE ll.ll.TIPLIERS, AR£ Iflll>ROPER, E.G., W, 611, 168, 2 41, 228 171el PARAGRAPH ru!BER: 6.5,1,5.C
!ll66£STED .8ACKF IT:
RE-DESIGN ~ TO CONFORIII TO 6UID£L.IrE - aIIIIINATE MJi.TIPLIERS, IF POSSIBLE. Hf DISPOSITION: IIIETERS ARE USED FOR SYSTEJII DISTRIBUTION FACTORS, f()T FOR ~T OPERATIONS~ TH EREFDRE ~ fil IIIIPACT ON Pl.ANT SAFETY. t() ACTI~
- DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE MJIBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY
~RKS:
E-30. ITEMS INVOLVED: SWITCHYARD STATUS ~ IIITRS. IIDIS INVCl. VED:
~RK NUMBER LOCATION CCJl)(lfENT JAE: SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM SEE ~RKS FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAfl _SYSTEfll ISCLATION \'fl.YES
11M EN6It£ERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 12/28/86
- t£D N)
.21Ai2229 ZM IIIARKIN6S, TITLE SURRY UNIT& CODE B RESPONSIBILITY NlD ASSESSIENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE 11/38/86 tU!AN ERROR:
IIIIS-READ DISUYED VALUE. INTERPO.ATION ERRORS. Hf PROll.9I DESCRIPTION: ZONE MARKIFE OBSCURE UNIT ~TION MARKS~ ARE MJT CIHilSTENT WITH PUWT IDNENTION F OR CO.OR USASE. 8780 PA~ ftJIIIBER:
- 6. 5. 2, J, B 6*. 5.2. J,C SU66ESTED BAO<FIT:
INCREASE CONTRAST OF UNIT ~TIOHS. STANDARDIZE COUJRCODHE. Hf DISPOSITION: USE TfRB>ARENT ~RTP9< TAPE TO li'ARK r<<lf!IIR.. ~ ~ SETPTS. rllD TO PREPARE 6 UIDELltES TO APPI.Y MRKIN6S, REFER TO PI-lli-1 12Mc!N7),
- DATA CO-LECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE fdBER:
TP-5.1 DISUYS SURVEY REll'ARKS: E-27. IIIDIS INV: STIii SEN BD FLOW I OTl£R KTRS AS ~ROPR.) ITEMS INVCl.VED: IIIARK NlJIIIBER LOCATION COIRlfENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FI-BD-llJA ff MJT IN INV FILE f FI-BD-11!JB ff NJT IN INV FILE t FI-BD-10-\A ff f()T IN INV FILE t FI-BD-184B ff NlT IN INV FILE t
ti.WW EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAPCf REPORT 12/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY 21A82230 DISPLAY OOTPUT DCES NOT ~CM ACCURATE READING IJHT@ CODE A RESPCJEIBILITY ASSES9£NT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 17/11/85
~ ERROR:
DISPLAY INTERPRETATION ERROR. lff PROBt.£111 DESCRIPTION: ERSS <REMARKS> REO READIN6 CF 25 (30) 6PPI FD FLW TO S6S.EXISTIN6 SCIU lllT ~Y. INTER VALS TOO LS. 87il0 PARAGRAPH rtMBER: 6.5.l.2,A SUSSESTED BACl<F IT: PROVID£ SCll.£ TO ~LOW CPERATOR TO READ 25 (30) 6PM FEEDFL.OW. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-71-14 128Al2216l. RESaLE INDICATOR*
- DATA ro..LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE fUIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND \Hl.IDATION
~S:
VI-6. ERGS: ECA-2.1, FR-H. 5, FR-P.1, FR-P. 2 ITEMS INVll.VED:
~RK tt.JMBER LOCATION CDR>>ENT ~ svsru SUBSYSTEM FI-FW-2:NA ff NJT IN INV FILE*
FI-FW-289B ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* FI-FW-208C ff NJT IN INV FILE*
tURi ENSINEERirE DISCREPAICY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY LMIT0 CODEC ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2231 IlflDE~TE PRECISI~ III-8 17/11/85
.._ ERROR:
INTERPtlATICl4 ERRORS / Hf PRCUU,I DESCRIPTION: PROCEDURES REQUIRE CPERATOR TO DETERIIIINE IIWST LEVEL TO 0.5% - PRECISION~ DISPLAY IS l.~ 8780 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: fi. 5.1. 2. A SU66ESTED BACKF IT: INCR£ASE DISPLAY PRECISION. CONSERVATIVELY ROIN) PROCEDURAL STATBENT TO IEAREST 1%.
*+* DISPOSITION:
RECmlEND Cl1'SERVATivaY ROLNDIN6 PROCEDURAL STATEMENT TO IEAREST 1%*
- DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIIIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJJ.ARKS: VI-12 ITEMS INVO._IJED: .
~RK fOIBER LOCATION cnPOr£NT NAIi£ SYSTEfil SUBSYSTEfil Ll-CS-2@0A PM388 EER CONTAitfEHT SPRAY SYSTEJII LI-cs-218B PAB388 IETER CONTAIIIENT SPRAY SYSTBI LI-CS-2M: PM389 METER ~TAIPIENT SPRAY SYSTEM LI-CS-218D PAB389 IETER CONTAINIENT SPRAY SYST91
It.A OOINEERIIE DISCREPArCY REPORT 12/28/86
- HED NO 21A82232 RS HXS SW su>PLY FLCM TITLE SURRY ltHT0 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS all>LT LAST REVIEW DATE 17/11/85 11M ERROR:
DISP1.AY INTERPRETATION ERROR. H-1 PROBL91 IESCRIPTION: EXISTIIE SCALE DOS P<<>T ALLOW FOR ~RATE READill6 ~ 6e88 SPIii AS STATED IN ERS FR-I.1. 8700 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5.1.2.D.1 S006ESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE SC!U TO~ CPERATOR TO READ 6N0 6Plt. HI DISPOSITION: DELETE-PROC FRP-2,l REQ 6N0 SPIii SW TO EA AVAIL RS HX. lffRS FI-sw-286A-D AVAIL 0 N SAfllE PNL, APPRCP sa¥-Eil CRMRIO
- DATA COLL.£CTIOH DESCRIPTION ~ CODE NJIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATION TP-5.l DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: VI-21. DISP: AT 0-aee0 SPIii. ITEJIIS INVCl~: - MRI< tOIBER LOCATION CDIPClENT ~ SYSTEM S1JBSYST9I FI-185A H NlT IN INV FILE 1 Fl-1"5B ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FI-285A DBB310 EER SERVICE WATER SYSTEM FI-28SB CWIB311 IETER SERVICE WATER SYSTEJI!
~ ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY ltl IT ii CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2eA02233 Irw>EGUATE SCALE RANGE. ENS II -6 03/17/86 KM ERROR:
INABILITY TO ASSESS PARA.IIETER STATUS. fff PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: PROCEDURES REOOIRE OPERATOR TO VERIFY TENPERATURE LP TO 1280 DES F - SCiti RAN;£ IS TO 700 DEG F. 8780 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1.2. D SUSSESTED .BACKFIT: REPLACE IETER WITH SCALE THAT CAN ACCOMODATE OPERATOR INFORl'IATION REOOIREl!IENTS;
+H DISPOSITION:
REFER TO E-29 (20A01136J. ICC UPSRADE TO ADDRESS *
- DATA CTUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIIBER:
TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: Vl-70. ITE!r. INVOLVED IS ON INCORE PANEL - NO ~RK NO. ITEMS INVOLVED: LOCATION COl'IPONENT NAAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEfll
!UC 1£TER ff NOT IN INV FILE+
i..- ENilNEERIN6 DISCIIEPArCY REPORT 12/28/86
- HED t<<J 21A82235 INADEQIJITE DISPLAY PRECISION TITLE SURRY ~ne CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfENT STATUS IIl-8 LAST REVIEW DATE 87/11/85 KJIAN ERROR:
INTERPCLATION ERROR. fff PROBL.£JII DESCRIPTION: PROCEDl.lRE 11E1lJIR£S CPERATOR TO VERIFY 14.2 PSIA - DISPLAY PRECISION IS TO rEAREST .5 PSIA. 17N PARAGRAPH l'UIBER: 6.S.1.2.A Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: INCREASE DISPLAY PRECISION. CONSERVATIVELY~ Pf!OCEDURAL. REQUIREf!ENT TO PEAREST .5 PSIA fff DISPOSITION: NJ ~TI!~. Cl> RED TO VERIFY PRESS LESS THAN 14, 2 PSIA, ~ D4/D5 PNL B IL.LIIIINS AT 14,2 PSIA, PA~ AVAIL ON PC* DATA CDU.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE IOIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~RKS:
VI-72. ITEJIIS INVO..VED ARE CONTAINll!ENT PRESSURE (4 DfN£1.Sl ITEMS INVCl.m>: MRK NJIIIBER LOCATION. COlflOJENT 191£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJI! PI-u.-2NA SAC311 METER LEAl<A6E OITORIN6 SYSTEJII PI-ut-281B SAAJ12 EER LEAKA6E 0ITORIN6 SYSTEM. PI-LJ1-2M: SAB312 IIIETER L.EAKA6E f(INITORINS SYSTEJII PI-ut-28ID SAC312 EER ~ OITORIN6 SYSTBI
. . . OOINEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 82/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY 29Ae2236 DISPLAY llJTPUT OOES t<<IT 'llCM ACOJRATE READIN6.
~IT0 CODE B RE!imEIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS II~
LAST REVIEW DATE 87/11/85 ti.MN ERROR: DI!Jll.AY INTERPRETATION ERROR, fff PROBI.BI DESCRIPTION: READirt3S CF 71 4" & 71 9" ARE IIEOOESTED. sau Ir£R91ENTS ARE IN 1.14ITS CF 2.4 Ir<<:t£S. 0790 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.5.1,2,D.1 Sl.6SESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE sau TOR.LCM CPERATOR TO READ r£CESSARY LEVELS fff DISPOSITION: RESOU 1£TER TO 2" IfCREIENTS ~ PUT IIIARKirt3S ON SCAL£T0 DEl(JTE 71 4" AND 71 9" *
- DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: VI-73. (lnlPClt£NTS ARE RECIRC SPRAY St.JJll ITOO INVOLVED: 11'.lRK NIJIIIBER LOCATION CDIPOPENT tAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LI-RS-251A *~ IETER CCWTAINIEHT RECIRCWITINS SPRAY SYSTEJII LI-RS-251B ff NJT IN INV FILE t
tUIAN OOINEERIIE DISC~ REPORT 12/28/86
- HED NO 28A82241 TITLE SURRY UNill CODE B DI~Y IJ.JTPUT DOES NOT ll.LCM ACCURATE READINS.
RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfENT STATUS II -£ LAST REVIEW DATE 17/11/85 tUIAN ERROR: DISP~Y INTERPRETATION ERROR.
/
tH PIICHUJII DESCRIPTION: IETERS It£R8ENT IN 4-1/2, 5-1/2., 6-1/2 - ~RD TO READ. 0790 PARAGRAPH ttl!BER:
- 6. 5. l, 2. D. 1 SOOGESTED BAO<FIT:
PROVIDE SCALE TO ~ OP TO READ NECESSARY. fff DISPOSITION: DilMJE SC!U TO 0 TO 25" WITH 5" MJOR IICRalENTS ~ 1"flIN'.lRS*
- DATA C(l.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ ~IDATION TP-5.1 DISPUlYS SURVEY REIIIARKS: Vl-73-2 ITEJIIS INVCLVED: IARK NJMBER LOCATION COIP()ENT fAilE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTBI LI-DA-211A ~12 PETER DRAINS (AERATED> SYSTEM LI-DA-2108 OAB312 IETER DRAINS CAERATEDl SYSTEM
~ ErEINEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT 12/28/86
- HED NO 21A82381 LlMINKE POOR FRt)I
- TITLE SURRY ~IT@ CODE B*
SCRATCHED AND DAAA6ED LIBHT LENSES RESP()EIBILITY ASSESSl'IENT STATUS II -7
~T REVIEW DATE li/17/85 *.
ti.MAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN D'ERATOR RE~
/
Hf PROBI.BI DESCRIPTI~: LENSES SCRATCl£D/DAIAE>, CArf(JT TELL IF LIGHTS ARE C.. OR £FF. DW<<JT BE CLEANED/REPAIRED. 9700 PARAGRAPH Ul£R: 6.5.3.1,B SOOGESTED BIO<FIT: REPLJ¥;E LENSES, Ct£D< FOR UJIIPACE DISCRHIIIW!ILlTY (AMBIENT LI6HTil't3 ~y BE TOO BRIGHT)
.... DISPOSITION:
REPlJn'. IU SCRATDtED/DAM6£D LIGHT LENS
- DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RBIARKS: PI-32 ITEJIIS ItMllYED: MRK to!BER LOCATION COflPONENT NAPIE SYSTEM SUBSYST01 IND LIGHTS H tflT IN INV FILE 1
~ ENSINEERitE DISC~Y REPORT 12/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY ~IT8 CODE B 28A02302 SYS/EQUIP STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEil'E CFF RESP!lSIBILITV ENG ASSESSIENT STATUS I -2 LAST REVIEW DATE 18/87/85 t<<.M ERROR:
ERRORS IN CP£RATOR RESPONSE FR()! EROEOOS ~PTIONS IF PL ANT STATUS DUE TO BURNED OUT BLU3S lff , PROBWI DESCRIPTION: SYSTEJ!l/EQUIPIIIENT STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEINS OFF INSTEAD OF ILWIINATED, 0700 PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER:
- 6. S. 3.1. C SUS6ESTED BAC!{FIT:
EVALUATE eot.SEQUENCES OF 1'1ISJUD6E!ENT DUE TO THIS PROB'...91 AND IF POTENTIA:... HAZARD, REVERSE lff DISPOSITION: r£EDS RINSBACK FOR AUTO UNBLOCK. REFER TO ANNUN STUDY PI-85 C20A02106l *
- DATA COLLECTI~ DESCRIPTION TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY AND CODE NU!raER:
RalARKS: PI-68-3. ITEf!IS INVOLVED: SI BLOCK ITEMS INV!k.VED: - MRI< N.JfUlER LOCATION COfRlNENT ~ SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll HDR/LINE DP H NJT IN INV FIL£
- HI STIii FLOW ff l()T IN INV FILE -t LO PRZR PRES ff NOT IN INV FILE
- LO STIii PRESS ff l()T IN INV FILE 1 LO TAVE ff l()T IN INV FILE 1
It.MN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCV REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY UN IT e COD A ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A02303 PERIHSSIVE STATUS LISHT INDICATI~ ARE INCCJEISTENT. ENS II -5 03/17/86 HMIN ERROR: MV CAUSE~ TO SYSTEIII ~ DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPO NSE. 1H PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: SOI£ STATUS LIGHTS INDICATE DESIRED STATUS liiEN LIGHTS ARE IUIJIINATED, OTHERS WHEN THEY A RE OFF. 1700 PARAGRAPH NUfi!BER: E..5.3. l.C SUS6ESTED BACKFIT: DETER,tINE l'IOST ADVANTAGEOUS CONDITIONS FOR CR PERSONNEL FOR VERIFICATION OF STATUS AND USE
~ISTENTLY THRLOUT.
DISPOSITION: STUDV/RE-DESIGN TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY, IN TERPIS OF ILLUM/LOCS OF LTS ARE CORRECT
- , I.E., PE~ IN PE~ <REAARKS). COORDINATE WITH DS-29-F9 (20A01313)
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJPIBER:
TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY
~RKS:
PI-69. DISP: COL~ BYPASS IN BVPASS COLIJIIN ITEMS INVO...VED: LOCATION COAPONENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM PERIIIISSIVES H NOT IN INV FILE t
-tif.lMN Eh61NEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 COD£ ASSESSl9T LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2eA823l4 CClffR(L STATUS LISHT ~INS IS Ir<<:ONSISTENT COMPLT 07/11/85 ti.A ERROR:
DELAY OR ERROR IN DETERMINING EQUIPIENT STATUS Hf PROa.EM DESCRIPTION: CWIR/POSTN OF STATUS LTS INCOOISTENT W/ OTHER W CTRLS6RN/Ya=DIVERT/1i1Atf.JAL, R£D/6RN=NOR
"' DIV/NOfllil=L.EFT/RT.
8718 PARAS~ NJ~R:
- 6. 5. 3. 1, C 6. 6. 6. 3 6. S. 1, 6. D, 1 6. 5. 1. 6. D. 3 SUSGESTED IR:KFIT:
REVISE TO BE CONSISTENT fff DISPOSITION: SOC STATES NO PROB LEAVE AS IS, OPS FAl'IILlAR W/ WS, USED TO WAY EA li<<JRKS. NO CO NVENTION FOR NOR!lt-DIVERT IR!IIRKSI MTA cou.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NU!JIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS ~D LOl:ATION AIDS SURVE:Y TP-8,1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RB!ARKS: PI-71H. POS. TO ESTABLISH ONE 1'116HT CAUSE PROBS (N£6 XFER), ITEJilS INVCl.VED: IIIARK NJIIIBER LOCATION COIJIOrENT FM SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEPI 1£\1-1244 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t LV-l15A ff NOT IN INV FILE t TCV-11~3 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f
~ EN6INEERltE DlSC~Y REPORT . 03/17/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY lJHT 0 CODE A 20A02~7 SYS/EQUIP STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEitE IFF, RESPONSIBILITY t<<JD ASSESSMENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 03/17/86 HUMAN ERROR:
ERRORS IN IPERATOR RESPONSE FRI)! ERRONEOUS ASSIJIPTIOHS CF P UWT STATUS DUE TO BURNED 00T nBS tff PROBL.91 DESC~IPTION: SYSTEIII/EOOIPll!ENT STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEitE OFF INSTEAD OF IU~lrflTED. 0700 PARAGRAPH MJIIIBER: 6.5.J, 1.C SOOSESTED BOCKFIT: EVll.UATE CONSEQUENCES OF IIIISJUD6EIENT DUE TO THIS PROBLEM AND IF POTENTIAL 14lZARD, REVERSE
*** DISPOSITION:
ADD TO PERIODIC TEST 26.1 FOR DAILY TESTING, NOTE: FAULT IN RADIATION SAPIPL.ER FILTER IS INDICATED BY LIGHT EEINS ON. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.IMBER: TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-68-2. ITEMS INVCl..VED: FILTER FAll.T RAD SAl'!PLER IIDIS INVOI.. VED: NARK NUMBER LOCATION COJll)()N£NT NAJI£ SYSTEI'! SUBSYSTEM FLTR FAULT H NJT IN INV FILE 1
/
HUMAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY LWIT0 CODE B ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A82319 INADEQIJATE cnfTRAST - LEGEND LIGHTS. ENS I -5 16/07/85 ttM ERROR: FAILURE TO RECOONIZE EllJIPIIIENT STATUS Hf PROa.B1 DESCRIPTION1 IU LEGEND LISHTS l>>I TURBINE CONTROL PAA£L ~ INADEGUATE CONTRAST lfiEN LIT - OP REPORT - CDFIRIE) BY OBSERV. 1781 PARAGRAPH tUIBER: 6.5.3.3.A.1 QJ66ESTED BACl<FIT: INCREASE INTENSITY CF INTERta ILLUMINATION. Hf DISPOSITION: IJJ6RADE SYS TO lr<<:REASE R£LIAB1LITY ~ ENSURE PROPER ILLUIHNATION. REFER TO VD-5 (2311-1288),
~TA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.OO!ER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REIIIARl<S: E-31 IIDIS IIWCl.'.tlh
!!ARK NJIIIBER LOCATI~ CQllllOIENT NA,£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TUR CNTR PN. ff t(JT IN INV FILE*
HU~ ~INEERIMJ DISCREPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REYIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82315 4YS/EOOIP STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEIMJ !FF. ENS III-9 02/14/86 tl.R ERROR: ERRORS IN CP RE~ FD ERRIMClJS ASSI.JIIIPTIONS OF i:tANT ST ATUS DlE TO aJRNED CXJT BULBS. fff PROllEM DESCRIPTICl4: SYSTOOEOOIMNT STATUS ff INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEIMJ OFF INSTEAD OF ILLUflINATED, UN PARAGRMi Nl.lltilER: 6.5.3.1.C St&ESTED ~IT: EWUJATE CONScOOEtaS iJf f!IISJUD69!£NT DUE TO THIS PROBLEM AND IF POTENTIAL HAZARD, REVERSE fff DISPOSITICl4: PERIODIC TESTIMJ AND BULB ~INS IS PERFORMED AS REQUIRED. REFER TO PI-69 (20A 023a3),
.DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD NUPIBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURYEY - RaJARKS: PI-68-1 ITBIS I rMl.'S: - JIIARK NLIIBER LOCATION COlflONENT NAIE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM PERMS ST LTS ff r<<lT IN INV FILE
- TAVE DELTA T ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 /
ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT
~ 02/28/86 SURRY 1.,me CODE C ASSESSf!ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2481 RECORDERS f<<lT LOCATED IN PRIMRY IJlERATING AREA. III-8 82/lit/85 IUllN ERROR:
JIIAY CAUSE DELAYS IN (J)ERATOR RESPONSE FRI)! INABILITY TO VERI FY TRENDS. fH PROl!lEN DESCRIPTION: RECORDERS REQUIRED FOR USE BY OPERATORS t<<JT LOCATED IN THE PRI~RY OPERATING AREA. 8788 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5. 4.1. H St66ESTED BACKFIT: DETERIIIIt£ SUITABLE RELOCATION IF RECORD£RS AND RELOCATE. PROVIDE REDUNDANT INSTIMIENTATION IN OPERATil'E AREA. fH DISPOSITION: Ill ~Tit)l-{P ~ TIME TO 60 TO !{TR
- DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-5.l DISPLAYS SURVEY REMAll<S: PI-76-1. ITEMS INYll.VED: HEAT-LIP &COCl.. ~ D'JlRT RECORD£R ITENS INYCl.~lh JIIARK NIIBER LOCATICJI COfilPOtENT ~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM IXKl..M ACRD ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f tEAT I.JI RCRD ff l'<<lT IN INV FILE f
ttJPIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED r<<I TITLE SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSti!ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 29A82482 RECORDER WINDCMS IIJST BE IJlENED TD READ DATA. EN6NOD II -6 (U/30/86 tUIAN ERROR:
IIAY CAUSE DELAY/ERROR IN IJIERATOR RESPaEE DUE TO ~TIO N FOi DIWIGE/DIRT IN CPENED WINDCMS Cf' RECORDERS. II* PROll.EJII-DESCRIPTION:
!P£RATORS 111.JST OPEN RECORDERS TO READ DATA BE~ LABELS OBSCURE WINIXJilS. WINDOWS DIRTY/D
~/SCRATD£D/61.ARE 8718 PARAG~ IUIB£R:
6.5.4,1.K SU66ESTED -BACKFI T: REPUa: ill l(JRN/DAn:IGED/DIRTY/SCAATCHED WINDOWS. REt.ABa. USE NON-61.ARE SLASS. PERIODIC fll AINTENAt<<:E DECKS. II* DISPOSITION: REPUU 9-ASS, !llVE LE6£NDS,
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTIOO AND CODE r<<JIBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI.-78 ITEMS INYII..VED: IIARK fUIIIER LOCATION COflSlONENT r9E SYSTEN SUBSYSTEM FEED Fllll ff "1T IN INV FILE- f NR-45 CNIS) ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 P6 BA ~ ff "1T IN INV FILE f RAD D6 ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 S6 WR'S ff "3T IN INV FILE f STBII FLCl4 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TE!ll£RATURE ff r<<IT IN INV FILE f
ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT
~ 03/17/86 SURRY ~IT e CODE B ASSESS.llfENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29Ae2W RECORDER PENS Cl.CE, INK 9IUD6ES PAPER. NOD II -6 03/17/86 HJIAN ERROR:
..UI.KTIONIN6 EGUIPMENT lllY REDOCE RELIABILITY OF TREND DAT A, !!CREASES PROBABILITY CF CJIERATOR RE~ ERRORS fff PROBl...9! DESCRIPTION:
CONTINUOUS FLIII PENS PICK UP LINT FRO'I PAPER AND CLOO. Wl£N REFILLING PENS, IN< SKJDSES TR END PAPER, 8710 PARAGRAPH NJ~R: 6.5.4,1,A SU66EST8> BACKFIT: REPLACE RECS. W/ THERl'l, /HEAT SENSITIVE RECS., PENS W/ REFILLABLE CARTRID6£ FaT TIPS, PAPE R W/ HIGHER OUAI...ITY. fff DISPOSITION: REPLOCE PENS WITH FELT TIP CARTRIDGES, AS REQUIRED*
- DATA CCUECTION ~SCRIPTIO'i AND CODE NU!IIBER:
TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REAARKS: PI-79 ITOO INVOLVED: LOCATION COfi!PONENT NAl'IE SVSTEl'I SUBSYSTEM Lil DISCH FLO ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t IESAWATT ff NOT IN INV FILE t 11:S COLD WRT ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t RCS lllT WR T ff NOT IN IrN FILE t
tlMW ENSINEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2'A82414 RECORDER PERFORM<<:E INADE~TE. NOD II -6 01/30/86 ttR ERROR: IIIAY r.AUSE LOSS Cf HISTORICR. TREND DATA DUE TO IIR.FI.JICTIONIN 6 EQUIPfENT, lff PROSL91 DESCRIPTI~: PENS ~ UP/STIU AT*~ ENDS. PENS CL~ WITH PAPER LINT. PAPER SLIPS ON FEED ROLL. NEE DlE CATDES. 87N PARASRAPH N.JIIBER: 6,5,4. l.A
!ll66ESTED BACKFIT:
CORRECT PEN/PAPER/tEEDLE PROBLEJIIS. ESTABLISH AND IIIIPLEIENT PERIODIC AAlNTENAtCE CHEO<S. lff DISPOSITION: IIIRS WILL BE WRITTEN AS REQUIRED. PERIODIC IIIAINTENIKE HAS BEEN ll'IPLEIENTED *
- DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEV IDARKS: PI-88 IIDS INYCl.VED: IIIA~ tolBER LOCATION CClflPOPENT ~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM P250 TRS ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 RAD IOI SYS ff NlT IN INV FILE f
~rap ff NlT IN INV FILE f RCP VIB ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 WSST ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f
ttlfllAN '3IN£ERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A82~ lll>ACT RECORDER RESPC>>tSE THE TOO LllE. ENS III-8 02/14/85 KMAN ERROR: , DELAYED RESP!HIE TH£ IIAY ADVERSE!.. Y ~FECT 1))8, DEC IS I ~ INS Cl¥)ABILITIES Hi DETERJIIININ6 CORRECTIVE OCTIONS. 1H PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: SWITCH SELECTABLE, PIIUL TIP!.£ CHlMEl. RECORDERS ~ ll£l.AY BETWEEN TlJliE INPUTS SELECTED AND PARAMETERS DISPLAYED. 8788 PARAS~ IUIBER: 6.5.4.2.B. ; Ql66ESTED BACKF IT: INVESTI~TE IIIIPROVIM3 CIRCUIT RESPONSE THIES AND ADJUST /l()DIFY AS REQUIRED. 1H DISPOSIT'ON: IIJDJFY OR REPI.Ja:
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE MJIBER:
rP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY r191ARKS: PI-81 ITEMS INVll.VED: NARI< NJ&R LOCATI~ COfllOtOT ~ SYSTE/lf SUBSYSTEJII ff r()T IN Iflv FILE t
~ EMJINEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODEC ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2418 Ill>OCT RECORDER RESPONSE TUE TOO LIIE. EN6 III-9 02/14/85
...,_ ERROR:
DELAYED RESPIH!E THIE ll!AY ADVERSELY ~FECT CPS. DECISIIJHA< IN6 Cll>ABILITIES IN DETERIIIININ6 CORRECTIVE ACTICN,. Hf PROllal DESCRIPTION: SWITCH SELECTABLE. IIIUI.TIPlE DffMEL RECORDERS HAVE DELAY Be:TIEEN TH£ Ifj)UTS SELECTED IWD PARAIETERS DISPLAYED. 1788 PARAGRAPH ~R: 6.5.4.2.B.4 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: INVESTIGATE IIIIPROVIN6 CIRCUIT RE~ WIES AND ADJUST/MODIFY AS REQUIRED. Hf DISPOSITION:
!ML£ ll<<R P-258 UPSRADE PROORAJII. SEE PI -98 (20000301 >*
- DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NIJIIIBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY IEIAll(S: PI-&1 ITEMS IfMl.VED: - . MIIK tUIBER LOCATION C()fll()f£NT rM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM P258 TRS ff "1T IN INV FILE *
/
HUMAN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW t£D f(J TITLE RESPONS lB ILI TY STATUS DATE 21A12411 I~~TE C!MiTRAST - IN< CO.ORS NOD II -6 "6/07/85 tUllN ERROR: MISREAD TRENDS. fff PRO!l.91 DESCRIPTIO.: GREEN PEN ON TR-1-433 - INADE(ljlTE CONTRAST BU£ PEN ON TR-1-409B - INADEOOATE COO!W;T S7N PA~ N.Jfl8£R: 6.5.4,2.A.2 SUGGESTED BACKF 1T: USE DARKER Ift< Hf DISPOSITION:
~IN CTRI..S TO ENSURE HI6H ll#LITY PAPER ~ INK USED WITH PAPER l!IAINTENANCE. RE FER TO PI-79 !2Wle2403> !R9IRKS1 DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUPIBER:
TP-5, l DISPLAYS SURVEY
~RKS:
E-32. DISP: 20A02403 RECCllflENDS FELT TIP TYPE INKING. IT91S INVCl.1,9: MRK tUIBER LOCATION im>l'.JNENT tM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TR-1-4898 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE
- TR-1-433 H r<<JT IN INV FILE*
Ill~ Etf3INEERI"1i DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO 21Ai2411 llillE~TE cmTAST - IMPACT RECORDER TITLE SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RE~IBILITY ASSESSPENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE
~/07/85 ti.A ERlllR:
READING ERRORS. fff PAOILEJII DESCRIPTION: PRINTER I§ INADe:IXJATE CONTRAST - CPEAATOR COMNT, COtflRIED THRll&iT OBSERVATION. 07N PARAGRAPH UBER:
- 6. 5. 4. 2. .B. 3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
DETEffll!IfE SOURCE IF PROB - INCREASE Ili!PACT FORCE ~/OR REPUll/REPLENISH INK SUPPLY ~/0 R USE DARKER Ht<. fff DISPOSITION: SUBIT MR TO FDIX RCROR Pe:R BACl<FIT, ENSURE ADl'IIN CONTROLOVER RCRDRS. HIBH 001l.IT Y ll'f( ~ ~R TO BE USED* DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NUPIBER: TP-5,l DISPLAYS SURVEY RalARKS: E-33. moo: RCP TE.!I> RCRDRS) ITENS INIJCl.lJED 1
~RK rtJIIIBER LOCATION~ NllE . SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TR-1-448 H tfJT IN INV FILE*
TR-2-448 RM.315 RECORDER ~TOR COCl.ANT <PRH!ARY LOOP, PWR) SYS ~TOR COOLANT PtM>S
HlMAN ENGINEERING DISCREAA'CY REPORT 02/28/86
- l£D NO TITLE SURRY UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESS/JIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2A2414 RECORDERS NOT LOCATED IN PRIMARY CPERATIN6 AREA. ENG I -2 07/11/85 K.- ERROR:
DELAY iN (J) RESPOOSE. tff PROILEIII DESCRIPTION: TREND RECORDER IS !GILE, ON ACART. 1718 PARASRAPH rtl"8ER: 6.5.4.1,H SU66ESTED BACKFIT: DETERIIIINE SUITABLE RELOCATION Cf RECORDERS AND RELOCATE. PROVIDE REDlNlANT INSTRUIIENTATION IN CJlERATING AREA. tff DISPOSITION: PEAMArENT INSTALLATION ON BErOi SOARD N£AR FW STATION*
- DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE !UBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY
~S:
PI-76-2 ITENS INUCl.VED: MRI< ttJIIBER LOCATION COll>OPENT NAIE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM S6 LVL NR TR ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
llWW ENSINEERlrE DISC11£PANCY REPORT 12/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNITI CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A8241S DISPLAY LOCATED TOO HIGH ON PHL.* CDIPL.T ~/17/85
..__ ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IJ> RESPONSE. fff PROllEN DESCRIPTION: DISPLAY LOCATED TOO HIGH ON PAPEL, .UST USE STCD. TO READ TO AVOID PAIR.LAX AND 6LAR£.. 1799 PARAGRAPH NIMBER: 6.1.2.5.B SOOGESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATED DISPLAY TO LOWER LOCATION. Hf DISPOSITION: DEL£TE-fRON INTERVIEW RESPONSE, IJ> REFERRED TO INDICATORS W/ l'IIRRORED SCIUS. TH ESE ARE BEi.CM 71", NOT FREQ USED DATA CDU.fCTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-1.2 ~THROPOETRICS SURVEY R81ARKS: PI-21-6 ITBIS IrMl.lJED:
!ARK NJNBER LOCATION COf!POt£NT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII PWR Rt..6 EFFL H MJT IN INV FILE I
a.6INEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT 1tJ1A1 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82583 IfAIEUTE VIEWIN6 ANGLE - ro..NTERS EN6 I -5 16/07/85 tUAt ERROR: READING ERIERS j 1H PAOa.EM DESCRIPTION: ClllfTERS ARE ttJT IOMED PEAPENDICLlAR TO CPERATOR LOS - ll.SO EXC£SSIYELY RECESSED FROM PA
,a SURF~.
8781 PARAGRAPH ttJIIBER: 6.5.5.1.B. l 6.5.5.1.B~*, SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE DISPLAYS TO LPPER BEfOiBOARD OR CAN'T DISPLAY UPWARD APPROX 38 DEGREES. 1H DISPOSITI~: PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DI6ITI-\. READOUT FOR CONTROL ROD BAtf< POSITION INDICATORS*
- DATA cw.ECTia. DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NIJIIIBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY 19ARKS: E-34. (CIJIT ROD BAN< DEii POSTN INDICATORS BATCH INTEGRATORS> ITBIS INVCL',fD: MAK IUIIER ux:ATIOH COlflOf£NT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff ttJT IN INV FIL£ t
ttR EN6INEERIN3 DISCREPA,CY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT8 CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A82981 Il<<llllrE IURJIIS r<<JT PRIORITIZED IN CR. ENS III-8 U/11/85 ltJIIIAN ERROR:
ERROR/DELAY IN !PERATOR RE~S tff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: r<<l ~DITORY PRIORITIZATION IF INXJ1IN3 IURfl SIWUi IN CR. (PS. ATIEND IU SISNLS AS EQU ll. I~T. 8710 PARAGRMi ttJMBER: 6.3.1,4,A.l 6.3.1.4,A.2 6.3.2.2,B SU66ESTED BACKF IT: ESTABLISH LEVELS IF PRIORITIZATI!R PROVIDE AUDITORY Sl!Nl. DIFFERENTIATION FOR ~ICATO R~ fH DISPOSITION: I(] PRIORITIZATION RECOll£ND£D. REFER TO N.w STUDY PER Pl-2 (20Ae2101l AND Pl-8 5 (28Ala21 fiJ6 J, DATA COU£CTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE rumER1 TP-3,1 ~ICIATOR SVSIDIS REVIEW TP-1,6 ~IENT NOISE SURVEY PI-35. I TEJIS I NVll.lJED: -
.IIARK fUIBER LOCATION CQllllllf£NT fM: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM H r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t i
tlfflAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/20/86 SURRY ~IT 0 CODE A ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A02902 PANEL AUDITORY ALARM SIGNALS TOO LOUD/HIGH PITCHED. ENS II 07/11/85 HUmN ERROR: MY CAUSE ERRORS IN OPERATOR'S RESPONSES DUE TO IRRITATION F
~ PANEL ALARJ!!S, Hf PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:
AUDITORY ALARfl SIGNALS ARE TOO HIGH PITCHED AND TOO LOUD. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.3.2. l,C SUS6ESTED BACKFIT: ADJUST PNL ALARMS TO l0DB<A> ABOVE AMBIENT NOISE LVL AFTER HED 2000-0004 RE!lJ!lil4ENDATIONS A RE EVALUATED/RESOLVED fff DISPOSITION: FIX AS PER SU6GESTED BACKFIT *
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N1.114BER:
TP- 3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW RE~RKS: PI-'46 ITE~ INVOLVED: LOCATION CQIIIPONENT ~ SVSTEIII SUBSYSTEM AUX*YENT PNL ff NOT IN INV FILE f FIRE PROT PN HNOT IN INV FILE* P250 CfllPTR ff NOT IN INV FILE t RADO SYS ff NOT IN INV FILE t SMO<E DET PN ff NOT IN INV FILE f
.tUIAN EtEINEERINi DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- t£D t<<l TITLE SURRY UNITI CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIIIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28Al2983 t<<l U>Illl.E UIIH:LEARED SIIMl. FOR AN<<.KIATOR SYSTB!. 'ENG II -5 11/17/85 11M ERROR:
DELAYS IN IJIERATOR*AE!iPO',SES Hf PROIUN DESCRIPTION: Tf£AE IS t<<l ~DIBLE CLEARED IUIRM SISfR ON ANN.JC SYS <t<<l YISI.R. IURfl - LIGHTS GOES OU T lfEN a.EARED. I 8711 PAAASRAPH IUIBER: 6.3.1.5,A
!IJ66ESTED BACKF IT:
~TE FEASIBILITY CF l!IIPWENTINS AUDITORY CLEARED ALARM FUfCTION TO PRESENT SYSTEM.
Hf DISPOSITION: INYESTISATE FEASABILITY IF INSTALLIN6 CLEARED ~Afflll SIS
- DATA cw.ECTIDN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJll!BER:
TP-3,1 ANIIJIICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW REMARKS1 PI.--51. JUSTIFY IF t<<lT INSTAU.ED, ITENS INYCL~: MRK ftl&R LOCATION COfllOf£NT l'9E SYSTEM SUBSYSTBI _,. CNTLS ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t
KJNAN ENSINEERI!'.G DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY ~ IT 0 ClJDE A ASSES~NT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A02904 TOO ~y ltlI~ ALARlilS IN CR, r<<J LOCK-OO'T CAPABILITY PROVIDED ENG II -5 03/17/86 l(Jll'.IN ERROR: DELAYS/ERRORS IN OPERATORS RE~S DUE TO INABILITY TO DIS CRIPIATE BETWEEN I~RT~ CF ALARJI! CONDITIONS fff PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: SOfE ALAR,115 SO FREllJENT THEY ARE CONSIDEffC'..D t<<JISAPCE, NO LOCIHlJT FUNCTION FOR OUT-OF-SERV ICE SYSTEl'IS/EQUIP 1780 PARAGRAPH M.JPIBE:R: 6,l,1,2,A,1 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: Mi...~TE/READJUST SETPOINTS FOR UR"5 LISTED, PROVIDE LOCIHXJT FOCTION FOR OUT-DF-SERVIC E SYS/EllJIP fff DISPOSITION: PERFORPI EN6INEERIN6 STUDIES TO~ SETPOINTS, ETC *
- DATA CfA.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CllDE NIJIIIBER:
TP- 3. 1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW REPIARKS: PI-51 I IDIS INVOL YED: LOCATION ClJPPONENT NAAE sYsm1 SUBSYSTEM URPIS ff NOT IN INY FILE t
~TI-fLDG AL HNOT IN INY FILE t llA FLO DEY ff NOT IN INY FILE t ll.NDR FLOW ff NOT IN INV FILE t HI-LY SCR NR ff NOT IN INV FILE t HT TRCG TRBL. ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 UO COND LL ff NOT IN INY FILE t LOOSE PARTS ff NOT IN INV FILE t LP DT DEY ff NOT IN INY FILE t P250 Ufllll ff NOT IN INV FILE t POLSH BD TRB ff NOT IN INY FILE t RCP SEAL-Ul ff NOT IN INV FILE t STl'I FLO IE/lfT ff NOT IN INY FILE t T-AVE,REF DY ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
- T/B SUl'IP ff NOT IN INY FILE t TURB SUlt.P PM tt NOT IN INV FILE t
lf.J~ ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86
- l£D NO: 29A02904 ITEMS INYll.VED:
SURRY ~IT 0 IIARK ru.BfR LOCATION COPIPONENT NAJIIE SYSTEll! SUBSYSTEM WTR FLO DEV ff f()T IN INV FILE t
H.JIAN EN3INEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY ~ITI CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al29l7 IN!lffICIENT RESPCWSE TUE FDR NKIATDR ~ . II -7 15/28/85 tUIAN ERROR: MY CAUSE COSTLY SYSTOOEOOIMNT REPAlRS AND/OR EXPOSE PERS IH£l. TD SAFETY ~ZARDS. I 1H PRO!lSI MSCRIPTIDN: ANft.N:IATDR ~RIIIS DO "1T IUo. fl)ERATORS ErG.QiT TIIE TD RESPCN> TO A~RNirE CONDITION. 1718 PARA6RAPH NlJlf£R:
- 6. 3.1. 2. A. 2 S006ESTED BAD<FIT:
~TE flAAIII AND ADJUST SETPOINTS ~ URIIS THAT DO "1T 1EET*6UID£Lit£S.
1H DISPOSITIC*:
~TE flAAIII SETPOINTS FOR ADEll<<Y OF RESPIN!E TIIE AND ADJUST SETPOINTS ACC DRDIH6LY*
~TA c:ru.ECTIIJI DESC:RIPTIIJIAND CODE NJflf£R:
TP-3.1 Art<<.WICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REJIIAAKS: PI-53 ITENS INY0.VED1 MIIK fUlf£R LOCATIIJI CQlll)(J£NT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM AWST LO LVL .H "1T IN INV FILE f
tlM EN6INEER1N6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED I() - TITLE SURRY 2IAa29l8 INSlfFICIENT RESPIJEE TIIE FOR NJCIATOR Ull6.
~ITI CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE EN6 15/28/85 llMAN ERROR:
fllAY CAUSE COSTLY SYSTEM/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS AND/OR EXPOSE PERS INEL TO SfHTY tf!ZARDS. fff PROIIL.EN DESCRIPTION: IMUCIATOR URflS DO NJT ~OW IPERATORS Eta.&t TIIE TO~ TO A IIRRNIN6 CONDITICli. 87N ~RAPH OBER:
- 6. 3.1. 2. A. 2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
£i.q~TE UlRM AND ADJUST SETPOINTS ON IURMS THAT DO r<<JT IEET GUIOO.IrES.
fff DISPOSITION:
~TE ADDIN6 ABt<<JIIR. LEVEL NKIATOR, WR LEVEL !KAT,
- DATA cw.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE IUBER:
TP-3. 1 f.lffOlCIATOR SYST91S REVIEW RBIAll(S1 Pl-53 ITENS INYILYED: _ fllAIIK IUBER LOCATION COll>Or£NT , - SYSIDI SUBSYSIDI CAT TAN<- ff NlT IN INV FILE I I
~ EtEINEERIIE DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT@ lllllE B A$ESS1ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A829l9 INSlfFICIENT RESPC>>ISE TIIE FOR IMJCIATOR URMS. II -7 85/28/85 11.R ERROR1 NAY CAUSE COSTLY SYSTEJII/EQUIPIENT REPAIRS IWD/OR EXPOSE PERS CN£L. TO SAFETY ~ZARDS.
fff PROJl.91 ~SCRIPTIClt: NUCIATOR IUlfM3 DO MJT ~ OPERATORS oo.&i TIME TORESPOa> TO A WARNIIE COHDITIClt. 8718 PARA6RAPtl IUUER:
- 6. 3. 1. 2. A. 2 SU66ESTED ~IT:
ewl.~TE EACH ALAR1i! ~ ADJUST SETPOINTS ON ~ARJl!S. T~T DO N OT fllEET 6UIDELH£S.
'*' DISPOSITION:
~TE 1LARM SETPOINTS FOR AD£000CY IF RE!lm& ~ ADJUST ~RDitELY*
- DATA ro.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-3.1 lltfOICIATOR SYSTEIE REVIEW PI-53 ITENS INYCLVED 1 NARK NJlilER LOCATION (Dl)()ENT tfllllE SYSTEM SUBSYSTE!II SI~ H/L L H NH IN INV FILE t
HI..R EN6IN£ERI"6 DISCREPArCY REPORT ~/28/86
- HED 1(1 TITLE SURRY 28A82911 INSlFFICIENT RESPOEE THE FOR INU<<:IATOR ilJIR,15.
UNIT0 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY EN6 ASSESSMENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE 11/11/85 IUIAN ERROR: IIAY CAUSE COSTLY SYSIDVEOOIMNT REPAIRS IWD/OR EXPOSE PERS IHEl.. TO SAFETY ~ZARDS, 1H PROBt.91 DESCRIPTIOH: l*.JCIATOR ~ DO r(JT AU.OI CPERATORS Eta.SH WE TOR£SP(M TO AWARNI"6 COOITICW. 978e PARAGRAPH Nl/lllBER: 6*.l, 1, 2, A. 2 / SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:
~UATE ll.ARM SETPOINTS ON ll.ARJIIS THAT DO ~T IEET 6UIDELINES.
1H DISPOSITION:
~TE ILARM SETPiJINTS FOR ADEr.UOCV OF RESPONSE AND ADJUST ACCORDINSLY. COORDI NATE WITH PI-71-12 i2eA82215),
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRlPTI()II AND CODE NUIIIBER:
TP-3,l IWf.JNlCIATOR SYSTalS REVIEW REJIARKS: PI:-53 ITBIS IrMl.',tD:
~i.< l'UllER LOCATION COtlPClt£NT t9E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM BAST HI L\11. ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
~IIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DJSCREPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY LWIT0 CODE RE~IBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2.IA82911 IN9.FFICIENT REsm&: TIIE FOR INUCIATOR ~ . CQIIIPt.T 05/28/85
. II.JAi ERROii:
MY~ COSTLY SYSTEM/EOOIPfENT REPAIRS AND/OR EXPOSE PERS
<HEl. TO SAFETY HAZARDS.
Ht PROll.EM IEK:RIPTIOlf: IMI.N:IATOR ~ DO tt'.IT ~ CPERATORS EtOJiH THE TOR£Sm4> TO A WARNIN3 CONDITION. 8711 PARA6IWlti IUIBER: 6.3.1.2.A.2 SU66ESTED BOCKFIT:
~TE EAai ~ AHD ADJUST SETPOINTS ON~ THAT DO MJT fllE£T SUIDaINES* .._ DISPOSITICJt:
SYSTEM DESIGN COOTRAINT - CAN'T DO ANYTHI~
- DATA auECTI!l4 DESCRii>TICJt AND CODE UBER:
TP-3. 1 ANOICIATOR SYSTOO REVIEW REJIAll(S: PI-53. I TEJIIS INIJCL\{Jh MRK fUIIIER LOCATIOlf CIJll()ENT rM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 6PT t£AT HI ff tt'.IT IN IIN FILE* FLD FRC6 ALA ff NJT IN I!N FILE 1 FW HTR IUIRtl ff NlT IN INV FILE* IP HTR DRN P ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 0' EXCITATIOlf ff tt1T IN I!N FILE 1
~ EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPIM:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITB CODE C ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW t£D Ml TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 21A12912 IN9.FFICIENT RESP TIIE FOR ~ REQUIRINS llJTSIDE Ir.FCIRMATICW III-9 98/97/85 ltR ERROR:
ll£LAYS JIIAY CAUSE COSTLY EGUIPflENT ~SAFETY ~RD ID PE RSOf£L. 1H PIUUII D£SCRIPTI0N: NUCIATOR ~ REGUIRIN6 INFO FR()! ClJTSIDE CR 00 NJTIUOW Sl.fFICIENT OPERATOR RESPOtif TUE. 87* PARA6RAPH r<<JIIIB£R: 6.3.1,2,B.l 6.3,1,2.B.2 9.166ESTED SACl<f IT:
~TE SETPOINTS FOR ALARIIIS AND ADJUST ACCORDINSL.Y. *** DISPOSITION:
NJ ~TICW - THERE ARE OPERATORS IN CONDENSATE PO..ISH1"13 .BUILDINS TO RESPOND TO A LARM. DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJIIIBER: TP-3. 1 ArftMICIATOR SYSTOO REVIEW
~Rt<S:
PI-54. ~ER CPS REVIEW RE-EVALUATE AT HEDAT LEVEL IIDIS INYO.YED:
~AK OBER L.OCATil>>I COfllOt£NT , - SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII BET~ PCl. ff r<<JT IN lrN FILE 1 I' F,.;INS ILR ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ~IN CTIL SD ff l<<lT IN IrN FILE 1
ltM EN6IfEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED l'(J TITLE SURRY UNITi CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28Al2913 INSlFFICIENT RESPCl4SE TIIE FOR~ REIIJIRINS CIJTSIDE IhfOR,IATIO ENS II -6 18/97/85 ltJAI ERROR 1 DELAYS JIIAY r.AUSE COSTLY EQUIPIENT JlAIIA3E/SAFETY ~ZARD TO PE RS(NEL. /
Hf PROILal DESCRIPTION: ANN.M:IATOR URNS RE1lJIRIN6 INFO FR()! CIJTSIDE CR DO N1nU.()l SUFFICIENT OPERATOR RESP(JEE TIIE. 17N PARASIW>H NJNBER: 6.3.1,2,B, l 6.3.1,2,B,'2 SU66ESTED BACKF IT:
£\q~TE SETPOINTS FOR URNS~ ADJUST ACCORDINGLY, fff DISPQSITI~:
N:ED WIDER RAN6E INDICATION !>>I DISPLAY, REFER TO PI-72-2(20A02202) *
- DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION IN> CODE IUIBER:
TP-3. 1 IMO,IICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW R01AA<S: PI-54-2
!TENS IN\,U.VED1 MARK r<<JNSER LOCATION COll)(KHT NAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM TURB LO VAC ff r<<JT IN IIN FILE t
EN6INEERIN3 DISC11£PAi'£Y REPORT tUIAN 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT8 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST R£YI£W t£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2914 INSlFFICIEHT RESPCHlE TII£ FOR URIIIS REIIJIRINS OOTSIDE Irt=OIWITIO ENS II -6 08/07/85 11M ERROR: DELAYS IIAY ~ COSTLY £QUIPIENT ~5'¥=ETY ~ZARD TOP£ RSCN'El. 1H P1Ul.91 .DEOCRIPTII*: IMUCIATOR ~ REOUIRINi INFO F~ OOTSIDE CR DO rtmuow SUFFICIENT OPERATOR RE~ TIIE. 1718 PA~RAPH NJIIBER: 6.3.1.2.B. l 6.3.1.2.B,2
!IJ66ESTED BACl<FlT:
Ml.~TE SETPOINTS FOR IURMS AND ADJUST ACCORDIN6LY. Hf DISPOSITI~: rEED 1¥>DITI!Nl. RAD flllH INDICATION IN CR*
- DATA a:uECTICW DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP-3.1 Aflt.NICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REYI£W REJl'.IRKS: Pl-54 ITOO INVCLYED: MRI< IUIIER LOCATI~ COIRl.tENT tfW: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM HI RN6 EFFW HNOT IN IJN FIL£ t
ti.IA £N6Ir£ERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT& CODE B A$ESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Ael16 INSlFFICIENT RESPCJ4SE TIME FOR IUIRlilS REllJIRIN6 OOTSIDE It.FORIIATIO ENG II -7 08/07/85 tulAN ERROR: DELAYS MY CAUSE COSTLY EOOIPIENT DAPRiE/SAFETY ~ZARD TO PE RSCMEL. 1H PROll.EN DESCRIPTl~: INUCIATOR ~ RE!lJIRIN6 If\fO F~ OOTSIDE CR DO l()TIUOW SUFFICIENT OPERATOR RESPC& TINE, 178& PARA6Rl¥lti rtJ!mER:
- 6. 3. 1, 2. B. l 6. 3. l, 2, B. 2 SIJ66ESTED BAO<F IT:
INSTIU AUX STEAIII LOW PRESS ~ . 141 DISPOSITION: INSTIU AUX STEAIII LO PRESS IUR,11,
- DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NI.MEER:
TP-3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEMS RfVIEW RENARKS: PI-54-4 ITENS INVCl.VED: Ml< NMIIER LOCATic>>I IDflONENT tAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII IIJX STN LP H NlT IN INV FILE t
Jt.lll9l EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IA8292I RIVER BACK PM. URfl ()N(JT BE SEEN FRCJI PRIMARY lllRK AREA, COO..T 07/15/85 tUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN CP RESPCNlE. i fH PROa.91 DESCRIPTICJh RIVER ~ PN1. URfil CJW(JT BE SEfN FRIJ! PRIMARY liORK AREA. OP MUST IA.I( TO & LOO< DIRECTL YAT~ PN. TO SEE. 8718 PARAGRAPH IUIB£R: 6.3.1.1 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: INSTIU AREDI.N>ANT ALAR,! IN PRIMARY l<<JRK AREA TO AVOID EXCESSIVE OP l(}VEJIIENT.
'** DISPOSITic>>f:
3RD LICENS£ AVAiuaE TO 0£0( ALARIII*
- DATA cw.ECTION DESCRIPTic>>f AND CODE OBER:
TP-1, 1 l<<IRKSM'.:E SURVEY REMARKS: PI-16 ITEJIS INVCLYED: MARK MJNBER LOCATION COlllONENT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RIV BCK ll.RM H f()T IN INV FIL£ 1
- ltJIIAN EN6It££RIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86
- 29A83882 mmn.s LOCATED TOO HIQl ~ ~s TITLE SURRY UNIT0 CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSl',ENT STATUS III-9 LAST REVIEW DATE 91/97/85 KM ERROR:
NAY CAUSE DELAYS/ERRORS IN CPERATOR RESPIM!E fft PAClll.9I DESCRIPTION: CONTRB.S LOCATED too HISH IA<INS ADJUSTIOTS DIFFICLU ESPECIIUY DURirE EXTEHDED CPERATIO NS. 1718 PARAGIWIH NJIIBER: 6.1.2.5.A QJ66£STED BACl<F IT: MlYE CONTROLS THAT REQUIRED PRECISE ADJUSTIENTS LOWER, PROVIDE PORTABLE STEPS FOROTl£RS fft DISPOSITION: PROVIDE STEPSTOO.S. SEE 1.2-3 (22A83e38) *
- DATA all.ECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-1.2 ANTHRCJPOIIIETRICS SURVEY R91A1f<S: PI-17 ITBIS UMl.VED: - NA~ N.116l£R LOCATI~ COfllONENT rfllllE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII 2-YS-f-lA NAA846 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEJII 2-VS-f-18 NAA145 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATI~ SYSTEM 2-YS-f-lC NAB845 DISCRETE ROTARY IJENTILATII:* SYSTEJII IOHC-81A NA8147 DISCRETE ROTARY COJIOf£NT an.Ir.a SYSTEJII 1£Y-CC-281 B H NJT IN IrN FIL£ t ICV-CC-282A ff NlT IN INV FILE 1 1£Y-CC-2828 ff NJT IN IrN FIL£ t NIS Pft. f f NJT IN INV FILE 1 RI-RMS-151 ff r<<>T IN IrN FILE t RI-RMS-152 ff r<<>T IN INV FILE I RI-fllll!H53 ff NJT IN INV FILE t
ti.A Et.1iINEERirE DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITi!I
- l£D NO: 28A83tMa2 ITEJIIS INVCLYED:
IRRK NJIBER LOCATION CIJlllmENT NAIE SYSIDI SUBSYSIDI RI-RNS-154 ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 RI-RM!H55 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RI-Rfll!H56 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RI-IIIS-157 ff NOT IN INV FILE* RI -RMS-158 HNOT IN INV FIL£ f RI-RMS-261 ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 RI-RNS-262 HNOT IN INV FILE f RI-RMS-263 ff NOT IN INV FILE* RI -RJIIS-264 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-SN-214 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RI-511-215 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RI-sw-216 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-sw-217 ff NOT IN INV FILE*
HIJA ENSINEERINj DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT9 CODEC 28A838l3 a..TRll.S LOCATED TOO LOW ON PAr£1.S AND ARE IU<WARD TD CPERATE REspCJNSIBILITY ENS ASSESSIENT STATUS III-8 UlST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 ti.MAN ERROR1
~y CAUSE DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATDR IIESP{N!ES lff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:
C(l{TR(LS ARE DIFFIClLT/IW<WARD TD CPERATE BECIUiE THEY ARE LOCATED TOO LOW DH PAfELS 07N PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.1,2.5.A Sl.66ESTED ~IT: DETERMINE CNTLS IIEQUIRIN6 PRECISE SETTit<<35 DR PROLOfEED IPERATIDNS ~ RELOCATE HIHR DH PAf£LS Hf DISPOSITIDH: REFER TD 1.2-3 (22AIJ938),
- DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-1.2 ANTHROPOETRICS SURVEY REMM<S: PI-18 ITENS INIJCLYED: MRK fUIIER LOCATIDH COflla£NT ~ SYSTEl4 SUBSYSTEM 1-YS-114A WABM6 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEJII l-YS-1148 ~ DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEM 1-YS-f-41 XMl46 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEM 1-YS-f-42 XABl45 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEJI 2-DH>-1A AAB216 IIIETER ctN>ENSATE SYSTEM 2-cN-P-lB AAC216 IETER CONDENSATE SYSTEJI 2-cH-P-1C AAA217 1£TER CONDENSATE SYSTEM 2-YS-114A WAA847 DISCRETE ROTARY YENTI LATI ON SYSTEJII 2-YS-184B IMM8 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEM 2-YS-f-41 XMl47 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SVSTEJI 2-YS-f-42 XMMa DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEJII
llJflAH EN6INEERJN6 DISCREPIKY REPORT 02/28/86
- 1£D.N01 2tA83803 IT91S INWl.YED1 SURRY UNITI NAI< UBER I.OCATI<* ~ NAIIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSIDI
~o ff r<<JT IN INY FILE t ~T0/"'1N STA ff NOT IN INV FILE t FCY-2478 EAA212 PROCESS C:O.TIIUER FE£NITER SYSTEM STEAfl aaERATORS FCY-2.SS EAB212 PROCESS ~TIIUER FEEDWATER SYSTEM STEAfl SEIERATORS FCY-2498 EM213 PROCESS CONTRW.ER FEEDIIITER SYSTEN STEM GEhERATORS FCV-.:!55A FAA212 PROCESS CONTIIUER FEEDWATER SYSIDI STEAfl SEIERATORS FCY-2558 FAB212 PROCESS CONTRW.ER FEEMTER SYSTEM STEM SENERATORS FLV-255C FAA213 PROCESS ~TRW.ER FEEDWATER SYSTEM STEAfil GEtERATORS fllV-fS-22 ff NOT IN INV FILE*
l(JY-ES-'38 ff NOT IN INV FILE t fllY-ES--67 ff NOT IN INV FILE
- NOV-ES-85 HNOT IN INV FILE t fllY-ES-95 ff NOT IN INV FILE t NRY-r4S-291A ff NOT IN INV FILE t NRY-f6-211B ff r<<lT IN INV FILE
- NRV-NS-?.tlC ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
!IJV-YS-111 YAA847 RELAY VENTILATION SYSTEfil SOY-VS-lllA YAAl45 RELAY VENTIL.ATI~ SYSTEM
~ EN6INEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86
- TITLE SURRY I.J. IT 0 CODE ~
RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A83N4 STEA,! GENERATOR FLOW CONTROLS It<<nNENIENTLY LOCATED EN6 I -3 03/17/86 tl.R ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN O'ERATOR RESPCJ4SES Hf PRO~ DESCRIPTION:
~TROLS LOCATED TOO CLOSE TOGETHER, ARE TOO CLOSE TO CONTROL ROD CONTROLS DUR!~ START-I.IP 0700 PARAGRAPH OBER:
- 6. 8. 2.1. A
- 6. 8. 2.1.B 6.8.2, 1.C Sl.6SESTED BACKFIT:
RELOCATE AS REQUIRED .Hf DISPOSITION: PROVIDE AUTO-BYPASS SYSTEl'I AND BYPASS FLOW INDICATION. ALSO PROVIDE TOTAL BYPASS FLOW INDICATION. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M.Jll!BER: TP- 9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ TP- 1,2 ANTHR!POMETRICS SURVEY REP.ARKS: PI-19-5. ITEMS INVOLVED: LOCATION COJIPONENT ~ SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll 1/FM-478A HNOT IN INV FILE t 1/Flll-478B ff NOT IN INV FILE t 1/FPl-488A HNOT IN INV FILE t 1/Flll-488B ff NOT IN INV FILE t 1/Ffl-498A ff NOT IN INV FILE t 1/Flll-4988 HNOT IN INV FILE t FCV-2478 EAA212 PROCESS CONTROLLER FEEDWATER SYSTE~ STEAfil ~..NERATORS FCV-2488 EAB212 PROCESS CONTROLLER FEEDWATER SVSTE~ ST~ SENERATORS FCV-2498 EAA213 PROCESS CONTROLLER FEEDWATER SYSTEfll STEAM SENERATORS
HUl'IAN ENSINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY UNIT 0 CODE A ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TIT~ RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A03e07 CCMROLS MY BE ACCIDENTALLY ACTIVATED BECAUSE CF POSIT!~~ CB. ENS II -5 03/17/86 tt.R ERROR:
' ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATIO. I fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION:
CX>NTROLS ARE LOCATED WHERE POSSIBLE ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATION ~y OCCUR. 0700 PA~RAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.4.1. 2. 6 SU6SESTED BAD{FlT: INSTIU 6UARDS ~ LISTED SWITCHES
*** DISPOSITION:
INSTALL A BJARDRAIL ON EDS£ OF BENCHBOARD*
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP- 4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-56-1 I TEIIIS INVIJLYED : LOCATION co,,p()NENT ~ SVSTEII! SUBSYSTEII! 1l:B-15D1 ff NlT IN INV FILE t ACB-15El ff NOT IN INV FILE t 1l:B-15Fl ff t()T IN INV FILE t RX~ CTRL ff NOT IN INV FILE t
HJIAH EN6IN£ERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITi CODEC ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IAl38l8 COO'IU.S INTERLOCI< UtECESSARILY, III-9 17/11/85 lUIAN ERROR: lllY CAUSE lHEC£SSARY DELAYS IN IJ>£RATOR RESPIHiE. Hf PR011.91 DESCRIPTICN'41 COO'RQ.S ~ lH£C£SSARY INTERLOCKING IECtf!NISNS. 1711 PARAGRAPH fU1BER1
- 6. 4, 1, 2. D, 1 6. 4.1. 2. D. 2 Sl&ESTED r<<KFIT:
DETERf!ItE rECESSITY FOR INTERLOCKIPE ll£l)ffiISP1S, REKIVE WHERE APPROPRIATE. Hf DISPOSITICN'4: eA.~TE WITH EN6INEERIN6 STUDY IWD REKIVE IF APPROPRIATE*
- DATA Cll.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-4, 1 CONTROLS SURVEY IEWl<S: PI-58. SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM BA-C-1A LMl68 DISCRETE ROTARY BOO RECCJYERY SYSTEM BR-C-1B UAAl69 DISCRETE ROTARY BO~ RECOVERY SYSTEJII BR-P-7A TBAl68 DISCRETE IITARY BOD RECOVERY SYSTEN BR-P-7B ff NJT IN INV FIL£ 1
tlJMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAl<<:Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNITI CODE B ASSEss,ENl' LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al38l9 OB9l.ETE comas NIT ABIOVED FRfJI comn. BOORDS. EN6 II -7 12/19/85 KJAil ERROR:
.DELAY/ERROR IN CONTRCL OCTI~
HI PIU!t.BI DESCRIPTIClh OBSlliTE CONTROLS REMAIN ~ CONTROL BOARDS. 87N PAROORM'i NlMBER:
- 6. 4.1. 1. B.1 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:
R9IJVE lHJS£D CONTROLS HI DISPOSITION: INVESTIGATE RELOCATING, RELOCATE IF APPROPRIATE.
- DATA CCllfCTI~ DESCRIPTI!l'4 TP-4. 1 CONTROLS SURVEY
~ CODE l'UIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATI!l'4 AND VALIDATI~
~RKSI PI""8-2.
ITEJIIS INYCl.lJED:
. ~AK rtJIBER LOCATI~ cc>>IP(IENT l9IE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM 1-YP-P-JA ff t(JT IN IrN FILE 1 1-YP-P-JB ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 2-IJP-P-JA DBA11l DISCRETE ROTARY ~ PRIIIIItfi (WATER SIDE> SYSTEJII 2-IIP-P-38 DBA113 DISCRETE ROTARY VACl.lM PRIMING IWATER SIDE> SVSTEJll FCY-ES-185 f f t(JT IN IrN FILE 1 FCV-£5-196 H r<<JT IN IrN FILE 1 FCY-£S-ll7A H t(JT IN IrN FILE 1 FCV-£S-117B H l'IJT IN INV FILE 1 H t(JT IN INV FILE f FCY-ES-285 FCV-£5-216 H t(JT IN INV FILE 1 FCY-ES-217A H t(JT IN INV FILE 1
ltJtilAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCR£PA1CY REPORT 02/28/86
- ITEMS IfMl..VED:
fAIIK NMBER L.OCATI~ CIJR>>IENT fAIE SURRY ~ITI SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM Fcv-ES-207B H r<<JT IN INV FILE*
tUIAN OOINEERIN6 DISC11EPA,f£Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT8 CODE B ASS£SSIENT LAST REVIEW HED l'<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A13111 CNTIIL CCN=ISURATIIJE DO NOT IIATCH Dll£R CNTRI.S FOR SAME FIKTI~ ENS II -6 81/U/85 IUAI ERROR: IELAYS/ERRORS IN !PERATOR RESPOEES Ht PROl!lEM DESCRIPTION: coons DO P(JT MATCH OTl£R coons FOR SAi£ FIJCTI~. UN PARASRAPH UBER: 6.4.1, 1.C.2 6.4.2.2.C, 1 6.4.2.2.C.3 S006ESTED ~IT: - REARRAf&: CONTRCX.S TO !PERATOR EXPECTATIONS _.. DISPOSITI~: RELOCATE~ AE SWIT0£S Tl£ SAi£.
- DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE PUIBER:
TP-4. 1 COfTRll.S 9.JRVEY REJIIM<S: RE-E~IJITE !¥=TEA D'96E CP/0 PI-62l IIDIS INYCl.\/ED: IM< OBER LOCATIOO t:DIO£NT rtlflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM STM DRY~ ff P(JT IN INV FILE t
/
1t.M Eff3INEERIP6 DISCREPAPCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW t£D r<<l TITLE RESro'ISIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A13112 mmn KtllBS/tAlllES ARE r<<lT DURAllt.E/SLIP LOOSELY CW SHAFTS. CORT ll/U/85 ltM ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN m>e:RATOR RESP(NiES fff PROll.EN DESCRIPTI~: CNTRL. Kr<<lBS/19dll.ES NJT DURAllE UNDER NJRIR/Ef£RSOCY SITUATI~. SCREWS LOOSEN/KNJTS SL IP LOOSELY ~ SHAFTS. 17lil PARASRM1 fUIBER: 6.4.1.1,E.2 6,4,1.1,E.3 QJ66ESTED BACXFIT: PERFOia. PERIODIC IIIAINTENK£ DECKS. REPLll KNOBS/lf!NDLES PARTICULARLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO IEA RW/ IOI£ DURAIU CIES
'*" DISPOSITI~:
WRITE IIRS TO CORRECT PROBLal. RE-EVAL~TE AFTER ,iRS AR£ PROCESSED*
- DATA au.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE !'UBER:
TP-4. 1 CONTRO.S SURVEY R9Wl(S: PI-63 ITENS IN\IU.YED1 MAIi< IOIIER LOCATI~ CQlllOtENT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 4161 E SW ff NJT IN INV FILE t 4168 I SW ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 FW BYP SWS ff l(JT IN INV FILE t SAi ON. SEL ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t J-KIH sws ff l'()T IN INV FILE t . OFF 1118 Y ff NJT IN INV FILE I Plll-To-ux:K ff NJT IN INV FILE t RAD 1G SYS ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t r<<lT IN INV FILE 1119 DECADE ff t
ltJMN EN6INEERitf3 DISCREPAFCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY 'UNIT@ CO~ A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW t£D 1(1 TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al3813 C(l(TRll.S DIFFIQLT TO ADJUST TO PRECISE LEVEL REQUIRED OOTRN I -1 88/07/85 tl.NlN ERROR: DELAYS OR ERRORS IN IPERATOR RESPCNiES . Hf PROll.BI DESCRIPTION: a>>ITRCl.S AR£ DIFFICtl.T TO ADJUST TO 1l£ PRECISE LEVEL REWIRED. 1718 PARAGRAPH OBER: .
- 6. 4. 1. 1. A. 2 Sl&lESTED MD<FIT:
PERIODIC IIIAINTEtflta CHECl<S. ~ ANY CNTRLS. T~T ARE It#PROPRIATE FOR FIKTION OR AR E BRO<EN. lff DISP0SITION1 INYESTISATE FOR fWY IIIAINTE PROBS, ~IZE ~ CTR!. DURIM3 TRAININ6, REFERS 6 LVL CTRl. TO PI-19-5 < ~ I DATA eot.LECTION DESCRIPTION~ CO~ NJIIIBER: TH, 1 C(l(TACl.9 SURVEY REIIIARKS1 PI -66. L~ FREQ 0:- USE ON IU llJT S6 L£VEL CNTRI.. SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII CHS FLW CTIIL ff f(JT IN INV FILE t Ell8 IJCl.T ADJ ff f(JT IN INV FILE t at: TURB CTR ff f(JT IN INV FILE t FW FL II/A ST ff f(JT IN INV FILE t flf FW RES W ff f(JT IN INV FILE t PZR SPRA VVS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t 11:P SBl. INJ ff f(JT IN INV FILE t SEil. WTR INJ ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t f(JT IN INV FILE S6 BYP CTR!. ff t S6 FL~ CTRL ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t S6 LVl CTRL ff f(JT IN INV FILE t
IOR4 £N8INEERIN6 DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNITI CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A83814 ruT-0:-sERVICE EQUIPIENT ~TRll.S f<<lT TA66EIHIJ'T IN CR II -5 85/28/85 IUIAN ERROR:
~y CAUSE DELAY/ERROR IN Cl>ERATOR RESPl)ISE.
Hf PROll.9I DESCRIPTION: CNTl'-5. FOR OJT-a=-SERYICE EQUIP. f<<lT TA66ED IN CR. fCl YISIA. AIDS/REMINDERS T~T EQUIPIEN T IS ruT-<IF-sERYICE. 1711 PARAGRAPH tUIEER: 6.6.5, 1.D SU66ESTED ~IT: PROVIDE TA&-0.JT LABELS FOR ruT-0:-SERVICE COIIJONENTS. Hf DISPOSITION: PE~ SIHTY CONSIDERATIONS. REVIEW ADNIN PROC., IJl6RADE IF tECESSARY*
- DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJIIAll(S: PI-87 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM TA6 IIJT LBt.E H f<<lT IN IIN FIL£*
llll!AN EM;It£ERIN6 DISCRE?At<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- l£D NO TITLE SURRY I.NIT@ CODE AB RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS
~T REVIEW DATE 28AIJ823 EtC AESET/1.0CKClJT C0'4TRO. l~IENTLY LOCATED ENG I -3 11/02/85 IUAI ERIIOR 1 t=..J.AY OR ERROR IN ~RATOR REsmEES Ht PRO't.91 DESCRIPTI~:
a£ RESET/LOO<OOT CONTRB.. LOCATED BEHIND YEATI~ BOARDS a* ee PARASRMi l'UIBER: 1
- 6. 8. 2. 1. A 6. 8. 2. 1. B 6. 8. 2. 1. C SUHSTED BACKFIT:
RELOCATE CONTRB.. NEAR EHC PAfEL ON BEtCHBOARD Ht DISPOSITlc>>i: INVESTISATE ~ 0: RESET FOCTION OR RELOCATE TO OR t£AR EHC PANEL ON BB*
- DATA ca.t.ECTia. DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIQ:R:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION TP-1.2 ~ R I C S SURVEY
- £MRKS1 PI-19-15/16 ITEIIS IIMLIJED:
IIARI< .tlllER LOCATION COllCJENT fflllE SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEM ff t()T IN INV FILE f ff t()T IN INV FILE t
IUIAN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPflCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY ~m, CODE B ASScSSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28A13124 DIil ~ Ptl> &PROCESS VENT ISO. VLY ams It<<:CIMNIENTLY LOCATED II -7 11/11/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY.OR ERROR IN l))ERATOR RESPOEES HI PIQLEJII DESCRIPTIC..: PROCESS YEHT ISO & CNlff YAC Pflll) ISO Yl.Y PIIIP ccrmn.s ARE ~ BOCHBOARD ~ TRIP Yl.Y COHTAO LS ~ YERTICll. ~RD 8718 PARAGRAPH NJll!ER: s.e.2.1.A 6. a.2.1. e s.e. 2.1.c QJ66ESTED ~IT: RELOCATE AS REQUIRED Hf DISPOSITI~: t<<l A:TI~ - WS CORRECTLY LOCATED W/ 6ASEOOS RELEASE CTll.S. PUMP CONTRfi.S BRWPE DW/ COO PRESSURE ~TRll.S, TRIP VALVES LOCATED WITH GASEOUS RELEASE ~TRCN..S* DATA cw.£CTI~ DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE tOIBR: TP-9, 2 VERIFICATI~ AND IJALIDATIOO TP-1,2 ANTHR(J)()IIETRICS SURVEY R0M<S: PI-19-13/14 SYSIDI SI.IBSYSTEJII FCY-&W-111 QA8057 PROCESS CONTRCllER SAS WASTE AADI!W:TIYE SYSIDI FCY-eW-161 SMl58 DISCRETE AOTARV SAS WASTE RADIIR:TIYE SYSTEJII FC\' 6W 261 SAAl59 DISCRETE ROTARY SAS ~TE AADI!W:TIYE SYSTEJII
tUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREAA'CY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT& CODE C A$ESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al3l25 FIRE PROTECTILW PANEL ~TRCl.S lr<<nfJENIENTLY LOCATED III-8 12/19/85 IUWW ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN CPERATOR IIESPIJEES tH PRIB.9I DESCRIPTI0.1 FIRE PROTECTION PAl£L COOR(LS POORLY ARRANGED 8711~MNER: 6.8.2.1.A 6.8.2.1.B 6.8.2.1,C Sl&STED ~IT: REARRANGE tH DISPOSITION: PLANT PROCESS COJIIJTER Will PROVIDE IIIIIIC CF FIRE PROTECTION AREAS. REFER TO PI-
- 184-7 (28111283) * .
DATA au.ECTia. DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIIIBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATla. AND WUDATILW TP-1.2 ~RICS SURVEY REJAl(S: PI-19-12 ITEMS INIJ(l.'JED:
~I< IOIBER LOCATION COJIIPOt£NT tM SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FIRE PROT H NJT IN INIJ FILE 1 l
tUIAN EN6INEER1IE DISCREPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT8 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASS£SSIIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2A3838 INADEMTE ~TR<l. CAPABILITY. 81/38/86 KMAN ERROR:
FAILURE TO CORRECTLY CONTROL COMPOt£NT/PARAPIETER. fff ~ DESCRIPTION: CONTROLLERS ARE DIFFICIA.T TO CPERATE DUE TO ~RELIABLE ('Tcu:HY"> REWEE. 0700 PARAGRAPH OBER:
- 6. 9. 3. 2. A SOOGESTED BAC!<FIT:
ENSirEERINS STUDY TO DETERIIIINE CAUSE: OF PROEI.EJII - CORRECT, AS APPRCPRIATE. DISPOSITION: THIS VALVE IS DESI6NED FOR PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ADJUSTMENT. SBL FU:.. IS ADJUST ED BY INDIVIDUAL NEEDLE VILVES, NOT BY HCV-1186
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NI.JflBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION R91ARKS: E-36. IOP COMIENT DURING SURVEY.> (ADD, 0700 SUIDE - 6932C> ITEJ!IS INVCl. VED:
~RK M.JMBER LOCATION COPIPON£NT l't'.llE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 1£V-1186 H t()T IN INV FILE f
HUIIW EN:iINEERINS DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT@ CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2'A83131 OWIGINS ~ l<<lVS AND VLV CCfflROLS NOT co-LOCATED ENG II~ 91/07/85 11M ERROR:
DEUlY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESP(JEES , j Hf PROBLa. DESCRIPTION: CHARGING PUPIP *IIIOV CONTROLS LOCATED ON VERTICAL PArEL AND SI.JCT/DISCH VI..V CONTR1l.S ARE~ B l'CHBOORD 8700 PARAGRAPH ltlll!B£R:
- 6.8.2.1.A 6.8.2.1,B 6.8.2.1.C SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
CO-LOCATE 1-1-1 DISPOSITION: REARRANGE RECIRC TO BB VLV CNTLS*
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE tf.NlER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1,2 ANTHROPOETRICS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-19-6 ITEMS INVCl. VED: JIIARK t(JMBER LOCATION COPIPOfENT NAIi£ SYSTa. SUBSYSTa. CH6 pp St.CT ff t{JT IN INV FILE f JIIOV-2267A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 fm'-22678 ff r()T IN INV FILE f i'IOV-2269A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 fOV-22699 ff t{JT IN INV FILE 1 JIIOV-2270A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 IOV-2278B ff t{JT IN INV FILE f Jl!OV-2275A H r()T IN INV FILE I fOV-22758 ff r()T IN INV FILE 1
- MOV-2275C
,OV-2286A ff H
NOT NOT IN IN INV INV FILE FILE 1
.f
~ ENSIPHRI~ DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 HED t<<h 20A83031 ITEMS INVOLV£rJ:
IIIARK tf.J!IIBER LOCATION al!PONENT .1'9£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII "1V-2286B ff t<<JT IN INV FIL£ t IIIOV-2286C ff t<<:IT IN IN\I FIL£ 1 lllV-2287A ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t lm-2287f. H t()T IN INV FIL£ 1
,ov-22a7i: H r<<JT IN INY FIL£ t
lf..R ENSINEERihS DlSCREPArCY REPORT Ql2/28/86 SURRY ~IT8 CODEC ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A83832 L/0 ti> SEil. OIL B/U & DC EIER OIL PIil CNTLS ~ S ClJHJFR-OJ-NEN ENG III-9 81/87/85 11M ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPCNlES fff PROaal DESCRIPTION: LIO Ill SEil. OIL B/U AND OC EIER OIL Pl'Jl AND 68£RATOR AIR SIDE OIL 8ACK1J) PUfllP (ESP> CONTR Cl.SNOT ARRANGED TO (J)ERATOR EXPECTATIONS UN PARASRAPH M.JtmER: 6,4,l,l,C.2 6.4.2,2.C.l 6.4.2,2.C.3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RE-'ARRAr<< TO OPERATOR EXPECTATI~
~ DISPOSITION:
PERFORM STUDY TO DETERMINE FEASIBILITY OF TH.Jf!BSWITCHES*
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NU!UlER:
TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY R84ARKS: JUSTIFY IF NOT CORRECTED (P/0 PI-62) IIDIS INV{l.'vE>: ll!ARK NUMBER LOCATION ~ T ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM OC EN OIL PM ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f ESP ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 1:.0 Ii> SEll. 0 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1
lllfilAN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY ~IT 0 CODE A ASSESSPIENi LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A3e33 EIIERSENCY DIESEL ~S 1 AND 3 ARRAtEED DIFFERENTLY FROM 1 AND 2, ENS II -5 83/17/86
~ ERROR:
DELAY OR ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSES fff PRO&.EIII DESCRIPTION: 91ER6ENCYDIESEL PANELS 1 AND 3 ARRArGD DIFFERENTLY 1!700 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER:
- 6. 4. l, l, c. 2 6.4.2,2.C.l
£,, 4. 2, 2. c. 3 Sl.66ESTED 8'0(FIT:
RE-ARRANGE TO A CONSISTli'-lT PATIERN ACROSS PANELS .fff DISPOSITION: RE-ARRAM3E ON CR PAN£LS AND LOCAL PANELS ALSO. COORDINATE WITH DS-29-HlC2) (20A0 1316). DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIBER: TP- 4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-62 IT91S INVOLVED: MRK NLJll!BER LOCATION COIIIPONENT '"'E SYSTEJ!I SUBSVST£111 ED6 IJHA ff r<<JT .IN INV FILE t EDS PN1.. 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE t ED6 PNL 3 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
lt..R EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITi CODE B ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW HED NO \TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al3l39 mmo.s IIAY BE OCCIDENTIUV~TIVATED BECAUSE CF POSITI<l4 (14 CB, I -4 11/11/85 IUIAN ERRORz OCCIDENTl4.. ~TIVATI!lt. fff PROll.EJI DESCRIPTION: Cl)fTRO.S AR£ LOCATED lfiERE POSSI.BU &a:IDENTl4.. 14:TIVATI<14 IIAY OCCUR. 07i8 PARAGRAPH NJ!IER: 6.4.1,2.6 SU66ESTED BACl(FIT: INSTl4..L 6UARDS <14 LISTED SWITD£S. fff DISPOSITION: 61.JARD WITH CLEAR FLIP-UP SWITCH CCMRS *
- DATA CCl.l.ECTION DE~IPTI<l4 AND CODE NJ!IER:
TP-4, 1 CONTRll.S SURVEY REMA~S: PI-56-2 IIDIS INYOLVED: IIIARK rtJIIIBER LOCATION COf!POf£NT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM
,OV-cw-ZNA ff ~TIN INV FILE t IIIOV-cw-2888 ff NOT IN INV FILE t /
f()V-cw-219; ff ~TIN IrN FILE t
.ll!ClV-tW-289D HNOT IN INV FILE t l()V-cw-286A ff ~TIN INV FILE t .111Y-CW-2168 ff NOT IN INV FILE t . l()HW-296C ff NOT IN INY FILE t l<<IV-Ot-286D ff NOT IN INV FILE t
It.A. EN6I1£ERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT& CODE B ASSES9£NT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 I -2 96/97/85 11M ERROR: , FAILURE TO CORRECTLY COHTRB. IDIPARTIENT/PAJMTER. lff PROl!l.BI DESCRIPTION: DISPLAY~~ FOR coon PIANIP!l.ATION IS NJT IflEDIATE OR ~RENT. uee PARAGRAPH UBER:
- 6. 9. 3.2.D SOOSESTED BACKFIT:
EN6Ir£ERJrE STUDY TO DETERMINE SOURCE OF PRDBWI - CORRECT AS APPRCPRIATE. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO Pl-19 (20A03804) I-2 ENS. PROVIDE ~TO BYPASS SYSTat.
- DATA ctl.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OfER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION REMARKS: E-37. (HED WRITTEN ON OPERATOR COfllllENT DURING SURVEY.) ITE"5 INVCI.~: 1¥'.!RK ttJIIIIER LOCATION CQIIIPOENT rM SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII A/FCV-1478 ff NJT IN INV FILE f B/FCV-1488 HNOT IN INV FIL£ f C/FCV-1498 f f NJT IN INY FIL£ f FEED REG WS HNOT IN INV FIL£*
1t,g 9EINEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITB CODE C ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 20Al3843 ~TR .11.S INTERLOCK LNCESSARILY. III-9 87/11/85 11.M ;RROR:
;. IY CAUSE IHECESSARY ll£UlYS IN IJIERAT.IlR RESPG4SE.
fff PRf'a.91 DESCRIPTICl4: CCWTRO.S 14WE LN£CESSARY INTERLOCl<IrE ~IS"5. 0700 PARAGRl¥>H NlJIBER:
- 6. 4. 1. 2. D. 1 6. 4. 1. 2. D. 2 SU36ESTED BOCKF IT:
DETERMitE NECESSITY FOR INTERLOCKIMJ IE~ISIIIS. RBIIVE WHERE APPROPRIATE. fff D: 3POSITION: E~TE WITH 9EINEERIM3 STUDY IWD AElllVE IF APPROPRIATE.
- DATA CCll.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-4, 1 CONTROLS SURVEY R84ARKS: PI-58-3 IIDS INWI.VED: MRK NUIIBER LOCATION CCMPCJ8T rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RCS L[j(p SVS H 1'4lT IN INV FILE 1
EN6INE£RIIE DISC~Y REPORT 11.JMN 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT!! CODE C ASSESSIENT UlST REVIEW HED f() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2AJi44 OBSI.ETE ~RCl.S NOT RBIOYED FRO! W4TRCl. BOARDS. EN6 III-9 86/1!6/85 tUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CONTRCl. OCTIIJi.
... PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:
OBSQ.£TE CONTRO.S REJl'.lIN ~ COHTROL BOORDS, 071!0 PARAGRAPH NtJUIER: 6.4.1, 1.B, 1 SWGESTED BACKFIT: REflOVE UMJSED CONTROLS.
... DISPOSITION:
RELOCATE BACK BEHIND MAIN BOARDS*
- DATA CCLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER:
TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATI!l1.AND VALIDATII)( REMARKS: PI-69 ITEIIIS INW.i.e>: - IIIRK MJIIIBER LOCATION COIIPQIENT NAI£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM NIC-45A ff f()T IN INV FILE t NIC-4SB ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 NIS REC ASZ ff t()T IN INV FILE t
IOIAN Eh9INEEIUN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY UNITI CODEC ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 00 III-9 11/11/85 11.M ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CONTRO.. ~TION ffl PROFlBI DESCRIPTION: OBSO..ETE CONTROLS ~IN ON CONTRll. BOARDS. 1790 PARA6RAPH NUIBER: 6.4.1.1. B. l st.66ESTED BACKFIT: REPOVE UNUSED CONTROLS ffl DISPOSITION: PI-107 (20881113)
- RBOVE, COORDINATE WITH DATA C(LLECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-4. 1 CCWT!nS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATICW REJIIARl<S: PI-68-3 IIDIS INVn.."9: MRI< NUMBER LOCATION fDIIPIJENT rM: SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 5 KV RX IGlE ff r(JT IN INV FILE 1
~RTAP CTR ff t<<lT IN IN\I FILE t CHL WTR CIRC ff r(JT IN IN\I FIL£ 1 DI. WTR ~ ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 CN CLEAN SYS ff NJT IN INV FIL£ 1 CN ST TK L\,\. . ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 LIQ WST SYS ff r(JT IN INV FILE t LW EVAP SYS ff t<<:IT IN INV FILE t KlDE FRQ CTR ff r(JT IN INV FILE t NIS 8CH SW ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t PT LENS CRDPI H r(JT IN INV FILE t
ltJIIIAN BEINEERIIE DISCREPAP<<:Y REPORT Vfc./28/86 SURRY UNITI HED NJ: 2A38'+5 ITE!IIS INYCl.YED: MAK M.IMBER LOCATION CCMPOENT , - SYSTEJ!I SUBSYSTEfll RX BAN< ll1llE H MJT IN INV FIL£ 1 STM OU CID HNOT IN INV FILE*
ltJIIIAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/17/86
- - - ________________ TITLE SURRY UN IT 0 CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 20A03049 CCtlTRQ. IIOValENT DOES NOT CONFORM TO PCPULATION STEREOTYPES. ENS II -7 03/17/86
~ ERROR:
ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE. fff PRCIBl.9! DESCRIPTION:
~. START, RUN, OR OPEN IS NOT UP, RI&iT, FORWARD, CLOCKWISE OR PULL.
8700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.4.2. l SL66ESTED BACKFIT: RE-ORIENT CONTROL TO CONFOR,i TO POPI.UlTION STER£0TYPE. DISPOSITION: TACTICALLY DR.6E CONTROLLERS AND LABEL TO SHOW WHICH IS D8'.AND INCREASE (I.E., 100% DE*IND OPEN). NOTE: COORDINATE CHANGES TO CONTROLLERS
~ BORON RECOVERY PANEL WITH PI-19-4 (2e.J13020l.
DATA CO..U:CTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP- 4. l ~TROLS SURVEY
, REAARKS:
c-12 I ~ INVCX..VED: LOCATION COPlPONENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FC-1113A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FCV-1122 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FCV-2122 RAA914 PROCESS CONTROLLER CHEMICAL AND VOLUME CONTROL SYSTEM CHARGING FCV-BR-1e2A RAA071 PROCESS CONTRCUER BORON RECOVERY SYSTEI'! SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FCV-BR-1828 RAA075 PROCESS CONTROLLER BORON RECOVERY SYSTEl'l SUBSYSTEJ!l FIRST RECORD FCV-i:iW-100 QAA057 PROCESS CONTRCUER SAS WASTE RADIOOCTIVE SYSTEA SUBSYSTEN FIRST RECORD FCV-LW-185 aAA0S4 PROCESS CONTROLLER LIQUID WASTE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD IOJ-1186 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ICV-1758 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 LC-BR-107A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 LC-BR-UJ7B ff NOT IN INV FILE t PC-BR-109A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PC-BR-109B ff rm IN INV FILE f c-1145 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 V-LW-111 QAA052 PROCESS CONTROLLER LIQUID WASTE SYSTEM TC-BR-128 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
llJJIAN EN61NE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/17/86 SURRY ~IT 8 HED f(h 21A03e49 ITOO INVO..VED: LOCATION CQIIIPONENT NAfi!E svsm, SUBSYSTEfll TCV-BR-l 11A RAA072 PROCESS CONTROLLER BO~ RECOVERY SYSTEIII TCV-BR-lllB ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
HUfllAN ENiINEERltE DISCREPAfCY REPORT e2/28/86
- HED r<<l TITLE SURRY UNITI CODE B 28AIJ851 C(){TRCLS MAY BE ACCIDENTIUY ~TIVATED BECll.lSE IF POSITIIJ4 ON CB RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE ENS II -6 11/11/85 IUAI ERROR:
ACCIDENTll. ACTIVATI~ / Hf PROIUJII DESCRIPTIIII:
- COHTlnS ARE LOCATED HRE POSSIB'-E iuIDENTll. i:tTIVATION MAY OCCUR.
0718 ~RAPH UBER: 6.4.1.2.6 Sl..66ESTED BACKFIT: INST'l.L GUARDS ON LISTED SWITCt£S. Hf DISPOSITION: SUARD WITH CLEAR PLASTIC FLIP-UP COVERS*
- DATA C(llECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUUER:
TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-56-3 IIDIS INVll.VED: MRI< tUIBER LOCATIIII CQlll)l)£NT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TV-f!S-101A H NJT IN INV FIL£ t TV-flS-lllB ff r<<lT IN INV FILE f TV-flS-101C H NJT IN INV FIL£ t TV-flS-281A DAA211 DISCRETE ROTARY IIIAIN STEAM SYSTEJII TV-fl!S-Z01 B .DAB219 DISCRETE ROTARY IIIAIN STEAi! SYSTEM TV-fllS-281C DAA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAM SYST81
- HED t<<I TITLE IUIAN EN6INERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY IJNITI CODE B RESPl:N,IBILITY 02/28/86 ASSESSf£NT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE ENG II -7 97/11/85 IIIIAN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CONTRD- ~Tillt. fff PROB.EN DESCRIPTION: OBSCl.ETE CONTROLS REfllAIN ~ CONTROL fKJARDS. 87118 PARAGRAPH NIJIBER: 6.4.1.1. B~ 1 S006ESTED BACKFIT: REJIKlVE UNUSED CONTR(l.S. ffl DISPOSITION: REJIOVE l.NJSED CONTROL FROlll EHC PA.EL. CiAffiE TURBINE TRIP PBS TO OT-2 TYPE. DATA co.LECTIOO DESCRIPTIOO AND CODE IUBER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-9.2 IJERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ REfllARKS: PI-6i-4. ITEMS INYCl.\JED: MAK IUIBER LOCATION llJIPCJENT MANE . SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM OIPTR DVRIDE ff NJT IN INV FILE t COi llJTO SIU ff t<<IT IN INV FIL£ t LD FREQ I>>IND ff NJT IN INV FILE t IP MO SOC ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ t
IUIAH ENSINEERHE DISCREP1¥£Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT@ CODEC ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW HED r<<> TITLE RESP(JE!IBILITV STATUS DATE. 28A83855 INAIEQIJlTE ~TRll. CAPABILITY. III-9 16/17/85 K.R ERROR: FAIWRE TO CORRECTLY COHTRCL [Dll()ENT/ ~ R .
"" PRO!l.EM DESCRIPTION:
COHTRru.fRS ARE DIFFia.l.T TO CPEAATE DUE TO ~RELIABLE C1 Tru:HY 1 ) RESPClEE. UN PA~RAPH NlMBER: 6.9.3.2.A SW6ESTED BACKFIT: EN6Ir£ERIM3 STUDY TO DETERIIIINE CAUSE IF PROBLEM - CORRECT, AS 1¥>PR(J)AIATE.
-1H DISPOSITION:
CONTRCl. ~ A VERY L.111 FREIJJEtO IF USE. r<<l ~TI~ NEEDED. <LCO> FILL HDR FLCII)
- DATA CCllECTICIN DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.l&R1 TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION RBWIRKS:
E-36. (IJl COIIENT DURirE StJRYEY, > (ADD. UN GUIDE - 6932C) IIDIS INVCl.W>: IIARK tu!BEA LOCATION COIIPOENT NAIi£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FCY-1161 ff NlT IN INV FILE t
H..1MN ENSINEERINS DISCRmWCY REPORT 83/17/86 SURRY. I.NIT 8 CODE C ASSESSP!ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A03056 INADEOO'.ITE coma ~ILITY. II -7
~ ERROR:
FAILURE TO CORRECTLY CONTROL CQll'.>ONENT /PARAflETER, fff PRCIBlEJII DESCRIPTION: CCWTROLLERS ARE DIFFICIA.T TO IPERATE DUE TO LNRELIABLE (*TIX£HY*> REsmeE. 9700 PARAGRAPH l'UIBER: 6.9.3.2,A SU66ESTED m<FIT: EHSINEERIIE STUDY TO DETERJIIINE CAUSE OF PROBWI - CORRECT, AS APPROPRIATE. fff . DISPOSITION: PROVIDE t£V TO REIIIOTELY CONTROL BYPASS VALVE FRQ!n CONTROL ROOJII. CCHS FL(}j CONTRO
- L)
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE r<<JMBER: TP- 9. 2 YERIFICATI0'-4 AND VALIDATlllJ RE~RKS: E-36-3 (OP C()ll.llENT DURIIE SURVEY.) (ADD, 11710 GUIDE - 6932Cl ITOO INVOI..YED: MRK IO!BcR LOCATION COP!PONENT AE SYSTEl'l SUBSYSTEII! 1-Df-385 ff t(JT IN INV FILE t 2-0h305 ff NOT IN INV FIL£ 1 FCV-1122 ff t(JT IN INV FILE t
ttJMAN EN6INEEAIN6 DISC:~Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT9 COIE 8 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A3857 INAIIE~TE ~TRCl. ~ILITY. II -7 81/38/86 tUIAN ERROR: FAIWRE TO CORRECTLY COHTRCl. COllClM:NT/PARAIETER. Hf PROaal DESCRIPTION: COHTRO..t..ERS ARE DIFFICl.1.T TO CPERATE DUE TO ~RELIAa.£ ("Tcu:HY"> RESP(M£. ( 11700 PARP.SRAPH NJIBER:
- 6. 9. ?. 2.. A SOOGES",'ED BOCKFIT:
eSIIE£RIN6 STUDY TO DETERIIIINE CAUSE IF PROa.81 - CORRECT, AS APPROPRIATE. Hf DIS~ITION: Ir<<:REASE PERIODIC AND PREVENTIVE MINTEtfKE. (Bl(IIIKMN VALVE CONTROLS> AS APPi.I
- CAflE*
DATA COUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIIB£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND \qIDATION REMRKS: E:-36. (I)) COfiallENT DUAIN6 SURVEY.> (ADD. 87N GUIDE - 6932C) ITBIS ItMl.VED: NARK IUIBEA LOCATION IDIPONENT tM sysru SUBSYSTa! HIC-.31>-leeA ff NOT IN INV FILE t HIC*BD-lNB ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 / HIC-BIHM: HNOT IN INV FILE 1 PCV-BD-100A f f NOT IN INV FILE 1 - PCV-BD-lE HNOT IN INY FILE 1 PCV-BD-lNC f f NOT IN INV FILE 1
ltJIIIAN ENGINEERING DISC~Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNITII CODE lESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IAl3858 STEAM lllN> camn.s Ir<<:OMNIENTL yLOCATED. CDRT 91/97/85 KJIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RE~ Hf PROIUN IIESCRIPTICW: STEAfl JIUtl) CONTROLS TOO FAR ~y FIDI IIIAIN liORK AREA. 9708 PARA61WlH ruBER: 6.8.2.1,A . 6.8.2.1,B 6.8.2.1,C S006ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE TO BErOIBOORD. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-ccx.ocATED WITH t£EDED DISP'LAYS. "1T A PROBL91. t()ACTION r£EDED,
- DATA cw.ECTICW DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJIBER:
TP-9~2 VERIFICATI!lf AND Wl.IDATION TP-1,2 ANTHRCJllJETRICS SURVEY
~RKS:
PI-19-21 IT91S INVCl.VED: NARK rt.lMBER LOCATION CQIIP()ENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM STN Ill.DP CTR H "1T IN IW FILE t
tO!AN EM3IHEERI"6 DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITi CO.DE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al38S9 CTRLS-~T flJST BE OPERATED SI!U.TArEWSLY LOCATED TOO CLOSE TOOET EN6 I -2 U/11/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESP!N£. 1 Hf PROlUJI DESCRIPTI~: CTRSL LOCATED TOO CLOSE T06ETl£R AHO CPS GET IN EACH OTl£RS ~Y. 0781 ~RAPH N!MBER: 6.8.3.1.B rul6ESTED BACKFIT: INVESTIGATE FEASIBILITY Of RELOCATING CONTROLS TO ~ CPS lllRE FREEDIJI OF IIJVEIENT WHILE
~TROU.IN6 PARAIETER Hf DISPOSITI~:
REFER TO PI-19 ( ~ l RESOWTIOH IS TO~ IPERATI~ A M-fllAN TASK.
- DATA co..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-4. 1 ~TR!l.S SURVEY R91ARKS: PI-57. IIDIS INVll.YEO:
~IIK NJMBER LOCATION CO!flONEHT NAflE SYSIDI SUBSYST01 FW RES W H "1T IN INV FILE t
EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAFCY REPORT ttJ1IAN 02/2B/86 SURRY UNIT!! CODE ASS£S9ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al3868 RESISTIKE IS TOO LOW ON cnmns. COfllt..T 17/11/85 KM ERROR:
~Y/ERROR IN IP RESPONSE.
Hf PROll.91 IESCRIPTION: RESISTArCE IS TOO LOW ON CONTROL iOOBS AND CPS CAJNJT TELL lf£N THEY~ OCTIVATED THal. 1710 ~RAPH NUMBER:
- 6. 4.1. 2. E SlmSTED BACKFIT:
PERIODIC 11.AINT CHEDPROPRIATE DESISN.
... DISPOSITION:
DELETE - rtJT VIEWED AS PROBI..EPIATIC BY !£DAT*
- DATA CO...LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY REIi.ARKS: PI-64 ITEJIIS INVCLVED: - II.ARK rt.OOIER LOCATION COMPOENT l'M SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM
~ PCS ff rtJT IN lffJ FILE t YS-58A ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t YS-588 ff rtJT IN HN FILE t
tlR Eh6INEERIN6 DISCREPAtt'.:Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNITB CODE C ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A83961 INSTRUIENTATION AND EOOIPIENT IUSSit<<3 IN CR. NOD III-8 12/14/86 ilM ERROR:
~Y/ERROR IN IP RESP!NiE, fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~: ,
~ INSTRU!/EOOIP r£ED£D TO DTECT ABN'.JRJfl. ~T ~ITille/BRitE PLANT TO SAFE~
MIT PRESENT IN CR. 1780 PA~~ N>>IB£R: 6.1,1,1,A 6.S.1,1,E,2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: DETEf!111Ir£ IF INSTRUPI/EOOIP rECESSARY FOR ABM'.lf!lllll. CONDITIONS/PLANT~ AND INST~ IN CR IF REOOIRED, fff DISPOSITION: n£RE ARE CROSS TIES TO OPPOSITE lt,IITS ~X FEEDWATER SYSTEM. E())S WILL BE ANf(JTA TED TO ENSURE IPERATORS ARE AWARE OF CROSS TIES, DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JlfflER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJl'.lRKS: PI-103-35 IIDIS IrMl.i.e: IIIARK tUIBER LOCATION COflPONENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM . STM DRY AFII> H NJT IN INV FILE*
ltJIA4 ENGINEERil'ti DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY 28A83l62 INSTRlJENTATI~ AND EQUIMNT NISSIN6 IN CR.
UNIT& CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSIENT STATUS III-7 LAST REVIEW DATE 98/87/85 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN !Jl RESPONSE. Hf
- PRIJIUIII DESCRIPTION:
IU. lNSTRlJI/EQUIP fEEDED TO DETECT ABNOR!IA.. PLANT CONDITIIJe/BRlt>il r<<IT IN CR.
8790 PA~ r<<.JMBER:
6.1.1.1.A 6.5.1.1.E.2 SU66ESTED BACl<F IT:
DETERMINE IF INSTRUM/EQUIP NECESSARY FOR ABf<<l~ CONDITIONS/PLANT SHUTDOWN Pl4D INSTIU. IN CR IF REllJIRED.
... DISPOSITION:
ADD CONTIIL
- DATA COU£CTIDN DESCRIPTION~ CODE N!JIIIB£R:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION R91ARKS: PI-183-38. IT91 INV: CROSS corte:T CTRL FOR CHIT & IA SYS. ITEMS INVCl;l.e>:
~RK NJMBER LOCATION (Dll()£NT , - SYSTEN SUBSYSTEN SEE R91ARKS FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAfl SYSTEJII ISWITION VR..VES
HlJIAN El'EINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 12/28/86
- HED t<<l TITLE SURRY 28A83e63 INSTRIJENTATI~ AND EOOIPIENT JIIISSINS IN CR*
UNlTI COD£ C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSNENT STATUS III-9 LAST REVIEW DATE 18/17/85
.._ ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESPIHiE. tff PROa9I DESCRIPTION:
~ INSTRUM/EOOIP NEEDED TO DETECT ABMlRIA. PLANT CIN>ITIIMi/BRINS PLANT TO SAFE SHUTDOWN t<<lT PRESENT IN CR.
8780 PARAGRAPH rtJIIBER: 6.1.1.1.A 6.S.1.1.E.2 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: DETERll!l~ IF INSTRUIVEOOIP rEC£SSARY FOR ABr<<JRMll. CONDITI!Mi/lUNT SHUTDOWN AND INSTIU IN CR IF REQUIRED, 1H DISPOSITI~: ADD COCTRCl.
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ NJIIIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ REMARKS: PI-113-37, ITEMS INVOI..VED: NARK NJNB£R L.DCATI~ COIPOf£NT ~ SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEPI FW RECIR WS H f()T IN INV Fllf
- ltJIAH EhfiINEERIN6 DISCREPKY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT9 CODE B RESPONSIBILiTY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 29AIJl69 COOIKLS ~y BE iuIDENTALLY ll:TIVATED BE~ IF POSITI~ ~ CB. II -6 99/19/85 ttNlN ERROR:
ll:CIDENTAL OCTIYATI~. fff PROBlBI DESCRIPTICli: COORCLS AR£ LOCATED lffRE POSSIBLE ll:CIDENTAL OCTIYATION MY OCCUR. 0709 ~RAPH NUMBER:
- 6. 4.1. 2. 6 SOOGESTED BACKFIT:
INSTALL GUARDS ON LISTED SWITD£S. fff DISPOSITION: . 1iJYE INUCIATOR PUSHBUTTIM TO IOTTOM. CF BEM:HBOAADS SO THEY WON' T BE CONFUSED WITH REACTOR TRIP PUSHarTTIJ4S* DATA COLLECTIOil DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE NIJIIIBER: TP-4. 1 CCWTROL.S SURVEY REMRl<S: PI-56-4 ITEJIIS INYCL\9:
*IRK tOIBER LOCATIOil CDmENT NA1E SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM RX TRIP ff NJT IN IlfJ FILE*
/
lUAH EM:iINEERIN6 DISC1!£PA'C( REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITi CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28A83170 COORCl.S PIAY BE ACCIDENT~Y ACTIVATED BECAUSE CF POSITION ON CB, C()l)LT 19/19/85 ttM ERROR: ACCIDENT~ ACTIVATION. / H+ PROaal DESCRIPTICli: CONTRO-S ARE LOCATED lfiERE POSSIBLE ACCIDENT~ ACTIVATION PIAY OCCUR, 07N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.4.1,2.6 SLEGESTED BACKFIT: INST~ Sl.JARDS ON LISTED SW1TCt£S H+ DISPOSITION: DELETE - El Tl£R ~ LOCl<S OR NO PROBWI,
- DATA Cll..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-4,l CONTRfl.S SURVEY ffEIIIA~S: PI-56-5 ITOO INYCl.VED: PIARK tt.lMBER LOCATION Cl)Jl(J£NT 'NAfE SYSTEJII SUBSYSWI CTl!T IV ff NlT IN IPN FILE
- oc pp ff tm IN INV FILE*
TV-BD-2811A ff t()T IN IPN FILE
- TV-BD-2NB ff t<<JT IN INV FILE*
TV-BD-211C ff t()T IN INV FILE
- TV-BD-2ND ff t<<JT IN INV FILE
- TV-BD-2NE ff t<<lT IN INV FILE
- TV-BD-2Nf ff NOT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-205A ff f(]T IN INV FILE t TV-CC-28511 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-205C ff t()T IN INV FILE t
HJIAI EN6INEERIN6 DISC1EPAf£Y REPORT ez/28/86
- l£D NJ: 28Ae3871 ITEJIIS INYCI.YED:
SURRY UNITI JIARK l'UllER LOCATION COlfl()£NT , - SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEJII TV-CC-297 ff NOT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-219A ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 TV-CC-289B ff l'(]T IN INV FILE t TV-CC-219A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-CC-218B ff l'(]T IN INV FILE t TV-CC-218C ff NOT IN INV FILE* TV-CV-2214 ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t TV-CV-25eA HNOT IN INV FILE t TV-CV-250B ff l'(]T IN INV FILE t TV-CV-2SOC ff NOT IN INV FILE t TV-CV-258D ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t TV-DA-2Ml ff NOT IN INV FILE t TV-DA-200!1 ff NlT IN INV FILE t TV-IA-211A ff NOT IN INV FILE t TV-IA-201B ff l'(JT IN INV FILE 1 TV-Lll-299A H I\OT IN INV FILE 1 TV-ut-2008 ff l'(]T IN INV FI!.£ t TV-lJl-288C ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-ut-208D ff l'(]T IN INV FILE 1 TV-Ul-28E ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-ut-20ef ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t TV-fllS-209 HNOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-fllS-211 ff l'(]T IN INV FILE 1 TV-RC-2Sl9A ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t TV-RM-2NA ff l'(]T IN INV FI!.£ 1 TV-RM-2NB ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 TV-RP!-201C ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SI-298 ff I\OT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SI-201A ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-SI-211B ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-5S-2NA ff r()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-SS-2988 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TV-5S-201A ff r()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-SS-211B ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SS-212A ff r()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-5S-2t2B ff I\OT IN INV FILE 1 TV~ ff l'(]T IN INV FILE f
- TV-SS-2838 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t TV-5S-284A ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SS-2MB ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 TV-YS-289A ff l'(]T IN INV FILE 1 TV-VS-2898 H.P(IT IN INV FILE 1
ltJA ENSINEERitE DISCREPAICY REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY UNITIJ CODE ASSESSIENT ~T REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29AIJJ871 camn.s MAY BE ACCIDENT1¥.l.Y ACTIVATED BECAUSE CF POSITI~ ~ CB. III-9 11/11/85 tU!AN ERROR: IUIDENT!l. ACTIVATil)I, Hf PROa.EN IESCRIPTil)I: COO'RCN..S AR£ L~TED lfiERE POSSIBLE ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATil)I PIAY OCCUR. 1798 PARAGRAPH NIJIIIBER: 6.4.1,2.6 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: INSTIU GUARDS 1)1 LISTED SWITDES, Hf DISPOSITION: OCCID£NT1l. ACTIVATION OR STIP WOULD ~VE NO SAFETY CONS£11JeaS AND LITTLE OPERA
- TICJA.. INJACT, CSEE WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION PAGE WITH ORISil'R HED.>
DATA cou.ECTION D£SCRIPTl1)1 AND CODE M.JIIIBER: TP-\, 1 ~RCl.S SURVEY REPIARKS: PI-56-6 IT0IS INIJCl.VED:
. MARK rtllilBER LOCATil)I C(Jlll.ll(Jf8T l'flME SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII BEAR OIL PP ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 TURB TURN SR ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1
IUIAN ENSINEERINS DI&:AEPArCV REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNITI CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED tll TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2iA93872 mmn.s ~v BE ACCIDENT~Y ACTIVATED BECAUSE CF POSITION ON CB. EN6 II -7 11/11/85 KM ERROR: ACCIDENT~ ACTIVATI~ fH PROa.EII DESCRIPTION: CONTRO.S ARE LOCATED lfi£RE POSSIBLE ACCIIIEHTll. ACTIVATION ~V OCCUR. 97N PAN3RAPH NUMBER: 6.4.1,2.6 SI.GSESTED BACKFIT: INSTALL GUARDS CW LISTED SWIT0£S. fH DISPOSITION: l'OVE lP .ON PAr£L.
- DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-4.1 ~TRO.S SURVEY RBIARKS: PI.-56-7 ITEJIIS INWLVED 1 IIARK NUIIBER LOCATION COllflONENT NAIE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEII 1-BC-P-lB H NlT IN INV FILE* 2-BC-P-lB AAB113 METER BEARING COOI.IN6 0-RADIIR:TIVE SYST91
IUIAN EN;INEERIN6 DISCREPAPCY REPORT
) ~/28/86 SURRY UNITI CODE ASSESSIENT
- LAST REVIEW HED Ml TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al3873 IIMRll.S IIAV BE ACCIDENTIUV ~TIYATED BE~ CF POSITION ON CB. ENS II -6 11/11/85 tlR ERROR:
ACCIDENTR.. ~TIYATION. fff PROIUN DESCRIPTION: CONTROLS ARE LOCATED WHERE POSSIBLE ACCIDENTR.. ~TIYATION IIAY OCCUR.
~'711 PARAGRAPH OBER:
- 6. ~.1. 2. 6 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT:
INSTALL WARDS ON LISTED SWITC1£S. fff DISPOSITION: CHAN6E TO A DIFFERENT TYPE CF fflNDLE TO PREVENT ACCIDENTR.. ACTIVATION. .
- DATA cw.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-4. 1 CONTRCU SURVEY REIIARKS: PI-fxi-8 ITEJ11S INYll.YEO 1 IIAIIK MJIIIBER LOCATION CDIPOJENT NAflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM INSD RS PPS H hOT IN INV FILE
- EhSINEERIIE DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT lt.JIAf 82/28/86 SURRY UNITI CODEC ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28AIJ281 CNTRL. SWITC>IES TOO SfR.L FOR TORQI.£ REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE Tt£111. TAG III-9 12/15/85 ttM ERROR:
DELAYS OR ERRORS IN CPERATOR RESPCftSES Hi PROll9I DESCRIPTION: CONTRCl. SWITD£S ARE TOO 14\RD TD GET OUT OF Pill-TD-LOCK POSITION AHD NUST FORCE TH0I OUT CF POSITION. 8710 PARAGRAPH NJIIIER: 6.4.4.2.B SU66£STED BACKFIT: ADJUST J-lfNlt.£ CONTROL SiifITCHES FDR EASE OF REPOSITIONING UIIEETIN6 1710 TORQI£ 6UIDELH£S
>. REPLACE IF NECESS.
1H DISPOSITION: TRAININS PROB., !PS t()T CPERATINS CONTRW, PROJERLY*
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-4. 1 crwmns SURVEY REIWl<S: PI-65. NEED INDIYl!MJl. PRIORITIZATIONS FOR TRG FIX. IIDIS UMl.YED:
~Ill< NJIIIER LOCATION CCJ,IIP(]t£NT tM: SYST01 SUBSYST01 1> NEED LIST H t()T IN IrN FILE t
- 2) CF~ PU HNOT IN IrN FILE 1 /
J> LL-TO-LCX: H f()T IN INV FILE t
- 4) K CNTLS HNOT IN IrN FILE t J-19illES H t()T IN IrN FILE t
l<<.JMN EN3INEERIN6 DISC:REPAM:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITi CODEC ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<:J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Ai32l4 AFEW ROTARY SELECTOR ~TRa..S l4lVE r<<:J POINTER INDICATION. III-8 il/38/86 tUIAN ERROR:
~Ihfi CONTROL IN WRW3 POSITION OR !!lfSINTERPRETATl()I CF P RESENT ~TRn. POSITION.
- Hf PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION:
POINTER INDir.ATIONS ARE HIDDEN BY ORAP&:/PURPLE TAPE. 0700 PARASRAPH OBER: 6, 4. 4. S. D. 1 SOOGESTED BACKFIT: RE'10VE TAPE AS r£CESSARY TO EXPOSE SWITCH KNOB POINTERS. fff DISPOSITION: . FIX AS PER lro<FIT. ~ COLOR CODE LABELS WITH AN OAA'<6E OR PURPLE DOT. COORDIN
- ATE WITH LABELlrE STUDY PI-82 (28Alllil),
DATA m.LECTION DESC:RIPTIIJ4 AND CODE NUfUIER:
'TP-\,1 CONTROLS SURVEY REMRl<S:
DS-21, !DISCRETE THlJIIB ROTARY CONTROLS ()I t<<JT SHTDWN PNLS. l ITEMS INW.~: flARI< MJIIIB£R LOCATI()I lnflONENT rflfllE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 2-Dt-P-2C F~ DISCRETE ROTARY Delle&¥.. lNl YOJJIE CONTR!l. SYSIDI BORATION 2-cH-P-21) FAB29J* DISCRETE ROTARY Cl£JIIICR.. AND W.IJE comn. SYSIDI BORATION IIOY-FW-251B DAA216 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM lSCl.ATION YALVES Jl()V-FW-251D DAB21S DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSIDI ISOLATION VALVES IIOY-FW-251F DAA21S DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM Iso..ATION YALVES
fUIAN ENSitEERit.6 DISC~Y REPORT 12/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT@ CODE RESPCleIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28A032t5 IODTARV com~T ROT SEL CTRLS lfJT LS EtOJ6H TO Ill.I) EASILY llJllt..T 87/11/85 tt.lMN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CJl RESPlJISE. Hf PROa.al ~SCRIPTION: CONTRCl. IOOBS ARE r<<JT LARGE OO&i TO t()U) EASILY AND wrnwT FATIGUE. 07M PARAGRAPH NU!BER:
- 6. 4. 4, 5, F Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT:
~ KNOBS WITH LARGER, EASIER TO IIIAtfl6E KNOBS.
fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-AS SFTY FEATUR£, AFW CTRL IIIOVS DESISNED TO R91AI"1PN 45 SECS ON AUTO. IN RARE CASES, OPS ~ TO I~> DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: l'P-\,1 ~TRaS SURVEY REJl'.lRKS: C-16, DISP:OVERRIDE FEATURE, r<<JT DESIRABLE TO OVERRIDE EASY ITEMS INV(l.lJEih - lllRK IUIBER LOCATION COIPC>>ENT PAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IIJY-FW-151A ff r<<JT IN IPN FILE 1 lllV-FW-151B ff r<<JT IN UN FILE 1 IOY-FW-151C ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 IIIOY-FW-151D ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 IOY-FW-151E ff r<<JT IN IPN FILE 1 l<<l\l-AH51F H r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 IIJY-fll-251A CM216 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISCLATION Wl.VES
,r(JV-FW-251B DAA216 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEJII ISOLATICW IJALVES IIJY-FW-251C CAB215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISCUTION Wl.VES
- l<<l\l-FW-251D IOY-FW-251E DAB215 CM215 DISCRETE ROTARY DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER FEEDWATER SYSTEM SYSTEM ISOLATICW VALVES ISOLATION WLVES
~ EN6INEERIN6 DISCRmKY REPORT 12/28/86
- SURRY UNITI l£D NO: 28Al32e5 ITEJIIS INVILVED:
~AK ltJIIBER LOCATI~ CDIPOfENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII DAA215 DISCRETE ROTARY F~TER SYSTEM Iso..ATI~ Wl.VES
HI.MAN EN6It£ERI,., DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT 92/28/86 SURRY ~IT& CODE B ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAa32t9 awl'AifflENT RECIRC FANS LOOICR. ARRANIEENT AND LAYOOT, ENG II -6 87/11/85
>IR ERROR:
lP£RATION OF WRONS CQll)(J£NT, fff PROa.91 ~IPTI!t4:
~T RECIRC FANS ARIAEED LFT TD RT: 1B, 1C1 1A. COfQENTS Sltl.lD BE ARRANGED RT TD LFT.
IN~ OR NJIER SEQ 0710 PARASRAPH rt1"8ER: 6.8.2,2,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: ARRANz COfflONENTS FR(>>! L£FT TD RISHT IN ~ I C OR roERIC SE1!.£f£E. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO.PI-117-3 (28883816),
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP.:9,2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY REMRKS: VC-356. (co,ipQf£NTS AR£ ON ~IT VENTILATION PAIEL..> ITEMS INVCl.VED: MRK tu!BER LOCATION WIPflENT tfVE SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEIII 1-VS-f-1A ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f 1-W-f-18 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE* 1-VS-f-lC ff r<<JT IN INV FILE* - 2-VS-f-lA NAAl46 DISCRETE ROTARY VEMTILATI~ SYSTEII 2-VS-f-lB rt¥184S DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEIII 2-VS-f-lC NAB84S DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEII
tOIAH ErfiINEERING DISCREPAl<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED l<<l 20A83482 P()
TITLE SURRY FEEDBACK THAT PUSHllITTON ~TRll.S ~ UNIT0 CODE B BEEN OCTIVATED, RESPCWeIBILITY ENG ASSESSPENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 11/11/85 tU9I ERROR: IIIY CAUSE DELAYS/ERRORS IN CPERATOR RE~ lff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: IPERATORS ~ r<<J FEEDBACK THAT PUSHBUTTON CONTROLS~ BEEN OCTIVATED. 0708 PARA61"'H NlJq!ER:
- 6. 4. 3.1. B SOOSESTED BACKFIT:
ADJUST TO SHtlil RESISTIW:E lffN D£PRESSIN6 PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC IIIAINTENAfCE ON ALL CONTl!ll.S lff DISPOSITIONz DELETE - ADDITION IF RED/BREEN LISHTS PROVIDES r£EDD FEEDBACK 1S£E PI-77-4 (28A 02151), DATA COLl.£CTlll4 DESCRIPTION ANO CODE NIJIIIBER: TP-4, l alflRCl.S SURVEY REll!RKS: PI-67-1. ITEfll INV: INTRLK FOR R/S TO START S6 FW PP & FW BYP IIDIS IN\l(l.lJED: IIRRK rtJIIIBER LOCATION co,JlONENT , - SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FW BYP ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 S6 TO FW PP H MJT IN INV FILE 1
tt.WlN EIEINEERHE DISCREPAf(;Y REPORT W2BIB6
. SURRY lJNITi CODE A ASSESSflENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A3485 fll ~ ~T PUSHalTTCJ4 CCJ4TRO..S .14WE BEEN ACTIVATED. EN6 II -5 15/28/85 1tMAN ERROR:
IIAY CAUSE DELAYS/ERRORS IN CP RE!lm4SE. Hf PROB..91 DESCRIPTION: IP£RATORS ~ NO FEEDBACK THAT PUSHllJTTCJ4 CONTROLS HAVE BEEN ACTIVATED, 1700 PARAGRAPH NlJIBER: 6.4.3, 1.B SU36ESTED BACKFIT: ADJUST TO SHOW RESISTAra lf£N DEPRESSING PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC IIAINTENAra ON ALL CONTROLS Hf DISPOSITION: ADD 2 METERS, WR/NR, WR TO COVER IIAXIIIJIII PIPE ~ITV. SEE PI-71-11 (21Ai2214) *
- DATA ctLLECTICJ4 DESCRIPTICJ4 AND CODE tUIER:
TP-4.1 CONTROC.S SURV£Y AEJIIARKS: PI-67 ITEMS INVO.VED: IIARK MJIIIBER LOCATION CQllllJ()f£NT rM SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII DiS LlfE FLO ff NJT IN IPN FILE.t FT-1122 ff NOT IN INV FILE t / FT-2122 ff f(JT IN IPN FILE t
ltR EN3INEERIN6 DISCREPA1£Y REPORT 82/28/86
- 2eAa34l6 NO FEEDBAD< THAT PUSHBUTION TITLE SURRY UNIT8 CO~ A comns lflVE BEEN ~TIVATED.
RESPCIEIBILITY EN6 ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 11/11/85 t1.R ERROR: IE.AV/ERROR IN CJ) RE~ I fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION:
!PS lflVE r<<lT FEEDBACK THAT PUSHBUTTON COHTROLS ~ BW<<TIVATED.
0700 PARAS~ NlJ!llER:
- 6. 4. 3. 1. B Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT:
ADJUST TO 81,Qj RESISTAta WHEN DEPRESSIN6 PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC IIIAINTENArCE ~ !ti CONTRll.S tlf DISPOSITION: PEIIIIIISSIVE TO RESET ~ BEEN CHANiED TO 1 ,.IN FRIii 5 ,.IN. PROVIDE M.. ~IAT ION, 1 FOR TRAIN A AND 1 FOR TRAIN B. DATA COLLECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ ~ COD fUIBER: TP-4. 1 CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-67 ITEMS INV(l.'a:
~RK tUIBER LOCATION C()ll')()faT rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII SI RESET HNOT IN INV FILE f
KM EN61NEERl"6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/17/86
- SURRY TITLE .
IJIIT i CODE A RESPONSIBILITY
~NT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28Ae3487 r<<:I FEEDBAO< THAT PUSHBUTTON C(MR!l..S ~ BEEN ACTIVATED. II -5 03/17/86
~ ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN (J) RESPOOSE.
"* PR08l.EJil DESCRIPTION:
CPERATORS HWE NO FEEDBACK THAT PUSHBUTION CONTROLS HWE BEEN ACTIVATED. 87N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.4.3.1.B Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: ADJUST TO SHOW RESISTANCE WHEN DEPRESSING PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC IIAINTENAta ~ AU CONTROLS fff DISPOSITION: EXISTING INSTRUl8TATION CIIIASNAHELICJ PROVIDES NECESSARY FEEDBACK. CONTROL IN OU ESTION IS A no POSITION SWITCH THAT CI.ICl<S INTO POSITION. NO ACTION IS REOUIRED DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.DIBER: TP- 4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY
~Rt<S:
PI-67 ITEMS INVOLVED: IIARK NU!IIBER LOCATION COPPONENT NAIii£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 91R AIR~ H r<<:IT IN INV FILE f
II.A 06INEERIN6 DISCREPAN::Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT& CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESP!N>IBILITY STATUS DATE 28A934l8 t<<) FEEDl¥D< THAT PUSHBUTION cnmn.s KlYE BEEN ACTIVATED. EN6 I -2 15/28/85 ltMAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJI RESPCWSE. lff PROa.EM DESCRIPTION:
- IPERATORS l4IVE NJ FEEDBIO< THAT PIJSHllJTTCW CONTROLS ~ BEEN ~TIVATED.
97N PARASRAPH NI.MBER:
- 6. 4. 3.1, B SOOSESTED BACKFIT:
ADJUST TO SHQrl RESISTAra lffN DEPRESSIN6 PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC II.AINTENANC£ ON ALL CONTRCl..S Hf DISPOSITil)I: ADD BYPASS FLOW INDICATION, COORDI~TE WITH Pl-67-1 (2A3402l,
- DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-4, l CONTROLS SURVEY REIi.ARKS: PI-67-5 ITEJIIS INVCl.YED:
~IIK IUIBER LOCATION COflONENT NAi'IE SYSTEII S1JBSYST9I FW BYP FLIM H NJT IN IfN FILE 1
ttR ENHNEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITa CODEC ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A8428J UICK IF PROCEWRES. t<<JD III-9 16/U/85 tUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN ACCESSINS IJOClJENTS. fff PROl!l.EJII DESCRIPTION: EA I.MIT DOESN'T~ Co,Jlt.JTER SET !F PROCEDURES AVAIL TIPEASCNEL-SOflE OPERATINS PR0C/D£C KLISTS STORED IN INEX 1780 PA~RAPH ttll!BER: 6.1.3, 1,D SU66£STED BACKFIT: PROVIDE PROCEDURES ~D CHECKLISTS IN CR. Hf DISPOSITION: PROCS REQ IMED ~T SHCllD BE STORED IN CR. OTl£RS ARE AVAIL IN A TH!ELY ll!Arff:R. EP,AP,FRP,ECA,FCA,ARP IN CR. OTHER PROCS NOT REG HIED ~TION STORED IN Atf£X
- PERIODIC CHECKLIST StWJl BE PERf'OAIED TO ENSURE PROCS APPfDJ JIIAINTAINED.
DATA CD..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE !UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIAIMS: E~35. PI-7 <20080103> TO BE ~ IN SHULAR Jl!Aff£R. IIDIS INVll..i.el:
~AK tUIBER LOCATION CCJIIIJ()NENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IPS/D£CKLST H t()T IN INV FILE t
11.JA EN6Ir£ERirt3 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 02128/86
- HED NO
- TITLE SURRY UNITI CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfiENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 21883885 l'fl SILEJ<<:E Fll<<:TI~ ~ ANN.ICIATOR RESPCNSE CWTRCl.S ENS II -5 86/86/85 tUAI ERROR:
PIAY C'.AUSE DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR RESP!lEE DUE TO HIGH LEVEL S IF l'flISE. fff PROlllEN DESCRIPTl~: ANN. CNTRLS. lfW£ t'1 S£PARATE Sil.Ba CAPABILITY, ~IN, LIGHT TO FLASH lfiIL.E l(IRN IS SI LENT, 1780 PARAGRAPH t(JIIIB£R:
- 6. 3. 4, 1, A. 1 6, 3. 4, 1, A, 2 9.J66ESTED BACKF IT:
- PROVIDE SIL.Er<<:E CAPABILITY FOR ANNKIATOR REsmEE CONTROLS.
fff DISPOSITI~: PROVIDE SIL.Er<<:E CAPABILITY AND CONSIDER SELECTED RINJ8'0< FEATURE. SEE PI-85 121 A82186)
- DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUMa:R:
- TP-3,1 ~ICIATOR SYSIDIS REVIEW TP-1,6 Af!BIENT NOISE SURVEY REJIIARKS:
PI-37 ITEJIIS IN\JOLYED: PIARK fUIBER LOCATI~ CQIIIPOtENT , - SYSTBI SUBSYSTEM
- RESP CNT H r<<JT IN INV FILE t
ltlA4 EhSINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO 28Bl3el6 CRITICll. Fl.KTIONS ~TR(LS DO NOT TITLE SURRY
~
UNITI CODE B COYER/Bt.WlRD. RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 11/12/86 III-7 ti.A ERROR: fllAY CAUSE ~IDENTAL ACTIVATI~ OF SW1TD£S/C0STLY SYSTEM/EQ UIPIENT REPAIRS. 1+1 PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: CONTROL SWITD£S ACTIVATING CRITICAL FIJCTIC*S DO r(JT ~ *lYABLE COYER/Bt.WlRD TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATION. 8710 PARAS~ l't.JPIBER: 6.4.l.2.C.1 6.4.1.2.C.2 6.4.1.2.C.3 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: EYALlllTE FOR CRITICALITY OF FI.ICTION AND INSTAU. .oYABLE COYERS/SUARDS WHERE APPLICABLE. 1+1 DISPOSITION: REPLACE TURBINE CONTROL PUSHBUTIONS ~ 61.JARD BY RECESSING *
- DATA Ct:llECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-4. l CONTRQ.S SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-55 IIDIS INVOI.YED: fllARK ttJIIIBER UJCATI~ COIPONENT rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RX TRIP PBS ff NlT IN INV FILE t SI BLKS ff NOT IN INV FILE t / SI PBS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t TURB TRIP PB ff NOT IN INV FILE t
~ EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY 28Be3818 IDTID. IS DlJllICATED I.NECESSARILY~ CB.
UNI11 CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ENS
~T STATUS III-9 LAST REVIEW DATE 11/87/85 11.R ERROR:
lHECESSARY ~RDWARE ADDS TO YISIA. CL.UTTER IN CR. ItCREASES PROBABILITY [F OPERATOR ERROR. / fff PROILEJII DESCRIPTill4: IPERATORS REPORT Tl4lT DUPLICATION Cf' THE CONTROL IS 1.WNEC£SARY IN CR. 8791 PARAGRAPH ~R: 6.4.1, l,B,2 SL66ESTED BACKFIT: REJIJYE DUPLICATE CONTR!l. FROII CB. f,f,4 DISPOSITION: ENGINEERING STUDY TO D£TER1i!It£ l'£Eil FOR IIUPI...ICATION. R90VE IF NOT 1'£EDED,
- DATA C(ll£CTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-4. 1 CONTROLS SURVEY
~tl<S:
Pl-61 ITEJIIS INVO..VED: fllARK tUIBER LOCATION CCN>IJrENT ~ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM CC HD TK YNT ff f<<JT IN IPN FILE t
ltMlH EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAt£Y REPORT 82/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT! CODEC RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 29813481 r<<I INTERLOCKING CAPABILITY FOR PB FOR PUTTING S6 IN IET LAVI.P, III-9 11/30/86 ti.JI.AN ERlftlf!:
MY C'.AUSE DELAYS/ERRORS IN OPERATOR RESPCNSE. fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: POSSIBILITY If' TRIPPING CLOSED THE MIN FE£D RES VALVES AND IIJVS WHILE DEPRESSIN6/IO.DIIE RESET PB. 8780 PARAGRAPH tOBER: 6.4.1.2.F SU66ESTED BAD<FI T: ADD MINTAINED POSITION OVERRIDE COHTROL FOR THIS FIJCTION. ENSURE AUT~TIC DISABLE llURIN 6 IU NECESSARY TI IES. lff DISPOS.ITION: SAFETY FIKTION OPERATES PER DESIGN. IT 9W.D N)T BE DEFEATED*
- DATA co..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE N.IIBER:
TP-4, l CONTRCl.S SU11V£Y REMARKS: PI-59 ITEJIIS INVOLVED: - MRK M.IMBER LOCATI~ ~ T tM: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII S6 BYP PB ff NlT IN INY FILE*
ttJMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 13/17/86
- l£D NO 28912385 TITLE SURRY PRZR tffR CTR!. STATUS LT INDIC !EWING INCOOISTENT
~IT e CODE B W/ OTHER CTRLS.
RESPONSIBILITY ENG ASSESSMENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 83/17/86 llM ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. tff PROBI.DI DESCRIPTION: IN Pll.L-TO-LOCK POSTN, STATUS LTS REMAIN LIT TO INDICATEBRKR FEEDING HTR CTR!.. CIRCS IN CLO SEDOR CPEN. 8780 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.5.3.1.C 6.6.6.3 6*. 5.1, 6. D, 1
- 6. 5. 1, 6. D, 3 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:
CPEN BRl<ER WHEN CTR!.. IS PULL-TD-LOCK. EXTINGUISH RED &GRN STAT LTS IN P-T-L, INSTiti 3RD LT FOR BRl<R CLOSED* DISPOSITION:
- tff RECEIVE CONTROL SWITCH SO TlflT RED LISHT IS NOT DEFEATED IN Pl.ll-TD-LOCK POS!TIO N. ~ SWITOi HANDLE TO PROVIDE TACTILE DIFFERENCE.
DATA C<UECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJl!BER: TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP- 8.1 CDIVENTIONS SURVEY TP- 9. 2 VERIFICATION AND IJALIDATION REIIIARl<S: PI-7e-2. <SEE PI-7e-1 (28A02304), PI-7e-3 12eB22306)), ITENS INVCl.VED: LOCATION CD,IPONENT NAME SYSTEfl SUBSYSTEl'I PRZR HTRS ff NOT IN INV FILE*
ttR EN6INE£RIN6 DISC~ REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT8 CODE 8 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28822316 AFW PP CTRL STATUS LT INDIC IEANIN6 IrccrEISTENT W/ OTHER CTRI.S. ENS II -6 87/11/85 tUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN (P RESPONSE. fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION: 1t1EN IN PULL-TD-LOCK POSITION STATUS LTS R91AIN LIT TO INDICATE EOUIP IS *IN SERVICE" <I. E
* , NOT Tl&El oon.
8708 PARAGRAPH rtJNBER:
- 6. 5. 3. 1. C 6. 6. 6. 3 6. 5. 1. 6. D. 1 6. 5. 1. 6. D. 3 S006ESTED BACKFIT:
tm< LP STAT LTS TO EXTIN6U1SH IN PULL-TD-LOCK POSTN. fff DISPOSITION: CORRECT PER BACl<flT*
- DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTICl4 AND CODE ~R:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-8. 1 ~TICIE SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RBIARKSz PI:-7&-3. (SEE A.SO PI-7&-1 128A82304l, PI-78-2 120812305). ITEMS ItMl.VED: MRK rtJMBER LOCATION COflONENT rtllE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII AFW PP H N>T IN INV FILE t
ENHNEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT ttJIAI i2/28/86 SURRY UNITQI CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED ti! TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28823111 ti! AtfUCIATOR RESPCNSE CCMR!l.S AT S()IE IIIAIN WAK STATill6 C1JlllLT 07/11/85 tUIAN ERROR:
~ y IN RESP!MlE TO ANIU£IAT0RS fff PROEl.£111 DESCRIPTION:
tll ~IATOR RESPCNSE CONTROLS AT RISHT END Cf BEfCH BOARD AND AT COf!PIJTOR CONSOLE 0700 PA~RAPH MJIIIBER: 6.1.1.3.C.2 Sl.66ESTED ~IT: INSTiu CONTROLS AT RISI-ff £ND Cf BENCHBOARD AND CIJIIPUTE~. Hf DISPOSITI~: DEl.£TE - ~ ADDITIOtA. STATI~ IS r(}T NEEDED, IT IS IIJREDESIRABLE TO KWE OPS TA KE POSITIVE OCTION
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-1.1 WRKSPACE SURVEY R91AR1<S: PI-4
. IIDIS Il'Ml.VED:
MRI< ttJIIIBER LOCATI~ (Dll)(]f£NT NAf!E SYST01 S1JBSYST0I NI RESP CTR H NJT IN INV FILE
- llR ENJIN£ERH6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNI11 CODE A 28823829 RESERVE STAT!~ SERVICE ~TRll. SWS IICCJNENIENTLY LOCATED.
RESPONSIBILITY ENG ASSESSIENT STATUS II -S LAST REVIEW DATE 01/17/85 tt.NlN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. Hf PROa.EM DESCRIPTI~: RESERVE STA S£RV CTRL SWS ~ BEfOIBOARD SHOJLD ~ WARD RAILIM3. 8708 PA~RAPH ~R:
- 6. 8. 2. 1. A 6. 8. 2. 1, B 6. 8. 2. 1. C SLE6ESTED BACl<FIT:
INSTALL 6UARD RAILING. Hf DISPOSITION: INSTALL GUARD RAILING. REFER TO PI-56 !2'A83807)
- DATA CCliECTILW DE5CRIPT1(l4 AND CODE MMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1.2 ~THROPOIIIETAICS SURVEY
~RKS:
PI-19-20
- ITEJ11S INVCl.VED 1
~RK NI.Jf!BER LOCATION fDIIJ()fOT PM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RES STA SERY H NJT IN INV FILE t
/
ttJlflH ENiINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT - 02/28/86 SURRY UNITla CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED 00 TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS - DATE 29.113821 80m. RECOVERY P~L ~RCl.S Itm.VENIENTLY LOCATED - EN6 II -7 lal/la7/85 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN (J)ERATOR R£SPCMlES / tH PROILEJII IESCRIPTION: CONTROLS "3T ARIIANE> BY SYS, SUBSYS, FUICTION, OR 0Tt£ RLOSll:ll. RATIOfRE UN PARAGRAPH NIJIBER: 6.8.2, 1.A 6.8.2.1,B 6.8.2. l,C SOOSESTED 8'0<FIT: ISRRANSE TO LOGICAL PAITERNS/SRClJPS fff DISPOSITION:
?£RFOR,1 ARRAN6£111ENT STUDIES. COORDINATE WITH VD-19 123A01005l, PI-72-3 ( ~
>, PI-113 ( ~ l l , PI-llla-3 (291182019), PI-119-4 (20001222),
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE !OBER: TP-9.2 1/ERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1.2 ANTHROPOIETRICSSURVEY REJIIARl<S: PI-19-4. RESPONSIBILITY: ENG/OPS/ESSEX IIDIS INVOL~lh
~RK NJIIBER LOCATION COl'IPONENT NAfllE SYSTEM SUBSYST01 B RCVRY PNI.. H ~TIN INV FILE t
r!J~ £NSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- l£D NO TITLE SURRY UNIT0 CODEC RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2aY13121 BA RECIRCULATI~ ~TRtl.S Il'CCNVENIOOLY LOCATED NONE III-9 11/11/85 tUIAN ERROR:
DELAY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR AESPQl&S fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: BA RECIRC CONTROLS Ct.I VERTiaL PAr£L, SHlllD BE ON BEtOiBOARD 871ie PARAGRAPH NIJl!&:R: 6.8.2.1,A 6.8.2.1.B 6.8.2.1.C Sl.66ESTED BACl{FIT: RELOCATE CONTROLS TO BENCHBOARD fff DISPOSITION: DELETE - ROOT CAUSE IS SYSTEJII PROBLEfll, RE. PUMP OPERATI~, PUJ!P l'IAINTENAf£E IS B ElrE PERFORIED, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NU"8£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATION TP-1,2 ANTHROPOETRICS SURV£Y REMARKS: Pl-19-1 ITEJIIS INVClVED: - MAK NUMBER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAIii£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM t£V-11M RAA326 PROCESS CONTROLLER CHEMICAL AND VOLI.JIE CONTROL SVSTEJll
HUPIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED .NO TITLE SURRY UNIT0 COD£ B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28Vi3822 IUlJIJLATOR TEST LINE lSCl. VILVE CONTROLS INCONVENIENTLY LOCATED ENG I -2 01/07/85 IUAN ERROR:
IIE1.AY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPONSES fff PROIUJII DESCRIPTION:
~TOR TEST LINE ISOLATION VAi.VE CONTROLS LOCATED ON VERTICAL PANEL HAVE UNi."ONVENTlON IL AR~
87N PARAGRAPH l'UBER: 6,8,2,1.A 6,8,2,1,B 6.8.2.l.C QJ66ESTED BACl<FIT: REARRINiE COOROLS
'** DISPOSITI~:
IIEARIREE VALVE CONTROLS
- DATA cn.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJll!BER:
TP-9, 2 VERIFICATION ~ VALIDATION TP-1,2 ~THR(J)QIIETRICS SURVEY IIEJIIAff(S: PI-19-19 ITalS lNYCI.\JED: NARK NJIIIBER LOCATION cmrioNENT NAfllE SYSTE."I SUBSYSTEJII ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 H r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
- HED NJ TITL.£ HI.A SURRY EttlINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT UNIT0 CO~ B RESPONSIBILITY 03/03/86 ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 28\122487 NIS AND PRZR RECORDERS Itm'NENIENTLY LOCATED II -6 11/11/85 tt.fMN ERROR:
. DELAY OR ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSES ._. PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION:
PRZR AND NIS RECORDERS Ir<<:CJMNIEHTLY LOCATED (ON VERTICll. PAr£LS> DURING STARTUP 0700 PARAGRAPH NlJIBER: 6.8.2.1.A 6.8.2.1,B 6.8.2.1.C SOOSESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE
... DISPOSITION:
I'() ACTIC~. EXISTING RECORDER LOCATIONS ARE ADEQUATE* DATA cn.L.£CTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE l'l.ffllER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1,2 ANTHROPOMETRICS SURVEY REJIARl(.S: PI-19-7/8. IIDIS INVCl.llED:
~RK N.OOIER LOCATION COf!PONENT NAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM LR-2-459 RECORDER REACTOR ctKlANT !PRI~RY LID>, PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER NR-2-41 RECORDER NI.Cl.EAR INSTRIJIENTATION SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD N/H-42 RECORDER NI.CL.EAR INSTRlJENTATION SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD NR-2-43 RECORDER NLCLEAR INSTRUENTATI~ SYSTEM StlBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD NR-2-45 RECORDER MJCLEAR INSTRlJIENTATION SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD NR-2-46 RECORDER NLCLEAR INSTRtJtENTATION SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJ!I FIRST RECORD NR-2-47 RECORDER NOCLEAR INSTRUIIIENTATION SYSTEJll SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD
HUMN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED t() TITLE SURRY UNIT@ CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESS1E~T STATUS UlST REVIEW DATE
~-7 FEED FLOW/STEM FLOW Cl4MEL SELECTOR SWS INCONVENIENTLY LOCATED. lDIPLT 81!@7/85 ttJ1AN ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN (I) R£SPONSE, fff PAOa9I DESCRIPTION: FD FLCII/STM FLOW OON£L SELECTOR SWS ON BACK PNL BELOI RCRDRS. SHOULD BE RELOCATED WITH R E6 W CTRLS ON l!IAIN CB 17"8 PARA61ti¥>H "'"8£R: 6,8,2,l.A 6.8.2,1,B 6.8.2.l.C SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: RELOCATE CONTROLS TO BENCHBOARD, lff DISPOSITION: DELETE-2 PERS (I), SROUPirE TOSETHER WOULD CAUSE INTERF EREN:E. SELECTOR SWS LO CATED W/ ASSOCIATED DISPLAYS* DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-1,2 ANTHROPOETRICS SURVEY RBIARKS: PI-19-10 IT91S INV(LVED: NARK NJIBER LOCATION C011PONENT NAf£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FEED FLIJ,l SW H t()T IN INV FILE 1 Slll FLIJ,l SW H NJT IN INV FILE f
lilJ!AN EN6INEERirE D1SCREPA1£Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT0 CODE 21V23828 CIRC WTR PP/BERG SERV WTR PP CTRI.S Ir<<:ONVENIENTLY LOCATED, RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIE.~T STATUS CD,IPLT LAST REVIEW DATE 01/07/85 KJIAN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN OP REPS(l£.
- Hf PROllBI DESCRIPTI~:
CIRC WTRJ PP/EJIIERS SERV WTR PP CTRLS ON BACK PAt£LS. SHruLD BE ON .BEtOiBOARD, UN PARA6RJ¥>H UBER: 6.8.2..-1.A 6,8.2.1,B 6.8.2.l,C Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CONTROLS TO BENCHBOARD, Hf DISPOSITI~: DELETE-BFP/SFW
- DATA COLL.ECTION DESCRIPTION~ CO.DE NUl'IB£R:
TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ ~ VALIDATION TP-1.2 ANTHfUIOIIIETRlCS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-19-11 ITBIS ltMl.VED:
~AK tUIBER LOCATION COfilPONENT NAIIIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEfll CIRC WTR PP ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t
/
HilllAN EN61NE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT 02/28/86
- HED t<<J TITLE SURRY UNITl CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 21A81791 ~TAINENT ISCLATION VALVE, 1-Sl-73LEFT CPEN. NONE COffl)l.T 07/11/85 ttJIAN ERROR:
ERROR IN CP RESPOEE.
/
fft PIIOILEM DESCRIPTION: VALVE INADVERTENTLY LEFT OPEN DURitE PERFOR~ OF PT-18.5, FLUSHI~ IF SENSITIZED STAIN.. ESS STEEL PIPING, 9798 PARA6RAPH tUIBER: 6.1.1.1.A SU66ESTED .IIACl<F IT : ENSURE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS IN PLACE. ENSURE IND£P£NDENT VERIFICATION BY PROC£Dt.JRE. fft DISPOSITION: DELETE-r<<lT ACRDR ISSUE. CONTROL IS LOCAL. INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION IS REOOIRED B
Y. PROCEDURE
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION IWD CODE NUll1BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATIO. AND VALIDATION
~RKS:
HR-lJ. WRITTEN FRIJIII LER-81-053/031..-0 ITEJIIS IrMl.lJED: fARK rtJMBER LOCATION llJIIIPON£NT 'NAIE SYST£111 SUBSYSTEJII 1-SI-73 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t
l I I HUfllAN Et,6INEERING*DISCREPANCV REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT1 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfllENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 21A81712 CIRCUIT BREAKERS FllJND !PEN. COlllPI.T 07/11/85 IUAN ERROR:
ACCIDENT~ ACTIVATI~ ~y Cl.JASE DELAY /ERROR IN !JI RESPONSE. HI PROll.EN DESCRIPTION: _IC>Y-1S68A OPEN. REDUND£NT FLO PATH FOR LHSI PP "B" FOONDErERSIZED. IC>Y-SW-282B OPEN, WOULD r<<>T ~TO CLOSE IF REG 8788 PARAGRAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.1.1.1.A SU66£STED BACKFIT: INVESTIGATE THE FEASIBILITY IF PUTilrE GUARDS AROl.ND THECIRCUIT BREAKER TO AVOID ACCIDENTA L ACTIVATION.
'** DISPOSITI~:
DELETE-ffJT A CRDR ISSUE. BRm<ERS ARE LQCl:l., .r<<JT IN JICR*
- DATA Cll.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION .AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REIWIKS: HR-14. WRITIEN FRQIII LER-81-838/831.--0, LER-Sl-047/03l--0. IIDIS INYCl.lJED: - MRK N.JIIIBER LOCATI~ COIIIPOHENT , - SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll ff NJT IN INV FILE f ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
HUMN £N6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED I'() TITLE SURRY UNITl CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 21Al2412 DISPLAY OOTPUT REQUIRES COOVERSI~. NOD I -2 KJR,j ERROR:
DISPLAY INTERPRETATION. ERROR. lff PROa.EN DESCRIPTI~: PROCEDURE <ES-9.21 REQUIRES !PERATOR TO DETERMINE CCXl.OOffi RATE - DISPLAYED VALL£ IS ABSOL UTE r<<JT RATE ** 17N PA~ ttJIIBER: 6.5.1.2.B SU66ESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE DISPLAY OF ~TIR. COOUJOWN RATE - E. 6. COJIPUTED VALUE. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO VD-7 (238024861. DISPLAYS l4lVE BEEN ADDED TO THE P.250 COPIPUTER SYSTEM*
- DATA ClllECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUABER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RBIARKS: VI-41 ITEJIIS INW.YED:
~RK tUlllER LOCATI!l4 COflPOtENT ~ SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll TR-2-413 PAB412 RECORDER REACTOR coo.ANT <PRI~RY LOOP, PWRJ SYS TR-2-423 PAAA 14 RECORDER REACTOR ~ T <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS
~ ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- 21Ae5119 DIESEL FIRE PIJfl) FlE.
TITLE OIL T~. SURRY UNIT1 [l)DE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfilENT STATUS COP!LPT LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85
~ ERROR:
ADflINISTRATIVE OVERSIGHT. fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: 1/0LIJIE OF FUEL IN FUEL OIL TAN< FOR DIESEL DRIVEN FIRE PUflP DR(J)PEJ) BEL!M l'IINIIUI. 8708 PA~RAPH NUP!BER: 6.1.1.1.A SOOGESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE ADJIINISTRATIVE CONTROLS IN Pl.AC£. fff DISPJSITION: DELETE-NOT ACRDR ISSLE. TANK IS FILLED LQCj:k.LY,
- DATA ClllECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlmBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~S:
H~-12, WRITTEN FROPI LER-81-076/03L--0 ITBIS INYCl.i.tD 1 NARI< tUIBER UICATI~ CQIIIPOf£NT , - SYSTEl4 SUBSYSTEl'I DIES FIRE PP ff t()T IN ItN FILE
- ttJIIIAN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 22981139 DAN6ER/WARNirE/SAFETY INSTRl£TI~ LABELS r<<JT APPROPRIATE.
RESPONSIBILITY NOD ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE "7 /11/85 IUIRN ERROR: INAPPIO>RIATE IPERATOR RESPCrEE. UO< Cf' OPERATOR REPONSE. Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: DANSER, 11¥1RNirE, AND SAFETY INSTRUCTION LABELS ARE r<<JT DESistED IN ACCORDArCE W/ APPROPRIA. TE SAFETY STANDARDS. 17te PARAGRAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.6.3.9.B SJ66ESTED BACKFIT: RE~ DESC~T DAN3ER/11¥1RNIN6/SAFETY LABELS W/ LABELS THAT ARE DESI6t£D IN ACCORDANCE W/ APPRCPRIATE STANDS, fl,f DISPOSITI~: REFER TO C-23 (22A01147> *
- DATA C(UECTI~ DESCRIPTI~
TH, I LABELS ~
~ CODE UBER:
LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-8 ITEMS Ih\lCl.VED:
!ARK NJIIIBER LOCATION COOJr£NT NAfllE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM DANSER LABEL ff tfJT IN INV FILE f SAFETY LABEL ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t IIIRNINS LABS ff r(JT IN INV FILE f
ttJ~ EN61NE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSP1£NT LAST REVIEW HED f() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22991481 OBSTROCTED ~TRll.. ~ ll:CESS. c:oi-.PLT v,6/07/85 tlJMN ERROR: PEl!S(JR INJURY. DELAYED OCCESS TO/FROI! CR. M,1A6E TO EOOIPfl ENT BRtUlHT THROL&I DOORWAY. Hf PR(JllD DESCRIPTION: L.6£ 00!.TS W/ WIPE MJTS tt'.JRIZONTALLY PROTRUDE FR()! CR ~CESS DOORS <DOORS Be:T CR &LOUt<<> AIOJT 3 FT A9JVE FLOOR 8780 PARAGRAPH N.lfl!BER: 6.1.1.3.C.1 QJSSESTED BACKF IT: StERTEN/REJIOVE/COVER .BOLTS AND WI,E MJTS. Hf DISPOSITION: DEl.£TE. IIIR TO Be: WR ITIEN AS PART Of' USUAL CR AA INT PROS. NOT DOOR OPS MJRmLLYUS E, f()T ~IDERED IN CRDR SCOPE DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUflBER: TP-1.1 l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY RalARKS: DS-7 ITEMS INYCLW>: MAK tU1B£R LOCATION CQIIPCJtENT ~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSi£JII CR ~ DOORS ff f()T IN IN\/ FILE t
1tJMN EteINEERirE DISCREPAt£Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSfl!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22AN111 STATIC ELECTRICITY CAUSES ERRATIC RBIDINGS CF IETERS. CQll!Pl.T 87/11/85 ti.A ERROR: ERROR IN o>ERATOR REsm.sE. j HI PROB.Bl DESCRIPTICN'4: STATIC ELEC r.AUSirE lfiRS TO STIDVACT ERRATIC/SO llJT ~ CALIBRATION. 0718 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5.1.2..F SOOGESTED BACKFIT: INITIATE STUDY TO IDNT1FY CAUSE OF STATIC ELECTRICITY AND BEST MEANS OF ELIMINATING IT. HI DISPOSITION: DELETE-cAAPETING TO LOW STATIC. I.WSTAT IS PERIODICALLY USED TO REDUC£ STATIC ELE CTRICITY* DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE NUMBER:
- TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND ',qIIJATION REJIIARKS:
P.9.2-17 *. 871110 6UIDLINE 6512F CLOSEST TO PROBLEM D£5CRIP. ITBIS INYCLl,E): NAIi< fUIBER LOCATION C(]MP(J£NT NAIE . SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IETERS HNOT IN INV FILE t
tt>>1AN EN61NE£R1N6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02./28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22AN112 lll.Y 31* BETWEEN F~ IF SS STATl()l AND LCIIER PANEL. COPIPI..T 07/11/85 tlR ERROR: ACCIDENT~ ACTIIJATI()l IF CONTRO.S FR!Ji! BODY CONTACT OR CONTA CT WITH DESl</CHAIR. 1H PROJl.EN DESCRIPTION: NINHUI SEPARATif>I CF 36' FRIJI BACK OF fWY DESI< TO ANY IPPOSIN6 SURFACE IS VIOI.ATED. 0700 PARASRAPH NIJIIBER: 6.1. 1. 3. E. 1 Slll6ESTED BACKFIT: MlVE SS STA TO LOCATION IN PRll'!ARY OPERATING AREA LARS£ ENOL6H TO PROVIDE SPACE REQUIRED B Y 6UIDEL1t£S. fff DISPOSITil>I: DELETE-6UIDEL1t£ REFERS TO AREA BET REAR IF DESK &CPPOSINS SURFACE, HEil ER~O USLY REFERS TO F~T (REJIIARKSl DATA C:Oll.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIBER: TP-1. l WORKSPACE SURVEY REMRKS: C-4. DISP: IF DESI< AND PAIEL. ITBIS !NUil.VEDz - MRK !UBER LOCATION c:o,moT ~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEfll SS STATION ff t<<lT IN INV FILE*
1tJ111AN EN6IrEERI,.; DISCREPANCY R£PORT 02/28/86
- HED t<<I TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE 22AN113 IfAIE~TE SPACE BETWEEN EQUIP/Pft.S AND OTHER CPPQSI,.; SURf~S.
RESPONSIBILITY ASSESS/ENT STATUS
- CONPLT LAST REVIEW DATE 17/11/85 HlllAN ERROR:
INAD£00ATE SM:E FOR PERSONEL TO PERFORM IU REQUIRED TASKS WITIIJUT POSSIBLE ACCIDENT!l. ACTIVATION CF ctNTRCl.S. 1H PAOSL91 DESCRIPTION: VIClATION IF MINIU SEPARATION IF 50' BETWEEN SI'6..E ROW Cf' EQIJIP/PN. AND IRL OR OTl£R 0 PPOSIN6 SURF~S. 1718 PARAGRAPH NJfllBER: 6.1.1.3.F.l QJSSESTED BACKFIT: INSTIU QJARDS OVER CONTROLS TO PREVENT INADVERTENT ACTIJlTION.
-.. DlSPOSITIDN:
DELETE-MJT*IN ACCORDAta W/ SUIDELINES, BUT POSSIBILITY OF ACCID ACTIV LOW. OH F LOOD CTRL PN.. Tl£RE ARE <RIIIRKSl DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUfl!BER: TP-1.1 .<<lRl<SPACE SURVEY REJIIARKS1 C-5. DISP: SOIE TOSSLE SWS, BUT THESE HAVE: f() SFTY CONSEQOCS ITEJIIS INYCLVED1 IARK NJNIIER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAIE SYSTEM . SUBSYSTEJII ANTHROPIJIETR H t()T IN INV FILE*
..._. EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED l'<<:I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ale2e8 l<<l PRIORITY CTRL PROVIDED. PA SYS~ BE_OVERRIDDEN W/OOT CR MIU>
- rOE COMPLT 07/11/85 IUIAN ERROR:
IJ>ERATORS cru.D IUSS EJiltRSEtCY ~ S . Ht PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: SP£MER IN CR CAN BE CONTRW.ED OOTSIDE IF CR WITIOJT OPERATI!Mi PERSOrf£L. KroLED6E. 0710 PARA6RAPtl NI.MBER:
- 6. 2.1, 6. F Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT:
INSTIU CONTROL FOR ANfOJN SYS IN CR. ALSO SOI£ TYPE OF INDICATION SHOWIN3 STATUS OF SYSTE
"(I.E., ~ OR OFFJ.
fH DISPOSITICW: D£L£TE-CTR1..S IN ARE EIIIER SW6EAR ROOfl WHICH IS CONTROLLEDACCESS AREA. SYS ONLY S HUTllOll4 FOR REPAIRS/SERVICE (m.R DATA CCIU.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.003ER: TP-2.1 CCIM.NICATIONS SURVEY RBIARl<S:
- c. .a. DISP: CPS OON' T NEED CTRLS IN CR OR STATUS INDIC.
ITENS INVCl.',{I): MRK N.JflBER LOCATICW ~ NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEII
~ SYS H l<<JT IN INV FILE t
HUMN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY. UNIT2 CODE A 22AN2t9 ~R IS r<<JT POSITICIED IN CR SO THAT IT IS AUDIBLE IN ALL ARBIS RESPONSIBILITY EN6 ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE U/11/85 IUAN ERROR:
~Y/ERROR IN (J) RESP(N;E.
1H PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: SPEMER LOCATED ATM END OF CR IS DIFFICll.T TO 1£AT ATOTtER END OF CR. 1711 PARAGRAPtl OBER:
- 6. 2. 1. 6. c. 2 SU66ESTED MCKFIT:
lllYE LIJUDSPm<ER TO PORE CENTRAL LOCATION. ADD SECOND LOODSPEAl(ER TO OTl£R END OF CR. fH DISPOSITION1 REFER TO DS-12 (28811811) *
- DATA CCU£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIIBER:
TP-2.1 l:IJIIIUICATIONS SURVEY IEWl(S: C-7. ITBIS INV(l."9: IIARK NJIGIER LOCATION CQIIIPIJENT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1
tlJ*IH ENHNEERIN6 DISCREPAOCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY 221*211 ~ R VCl.lJE art<<JT BE CONTRW..ED IN CR.
UNIT2 CODE A RE~IBILITY ENS ASS£88.1ENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 IIR ERROR: INABILITY TO ADJUST IJOLIJ!E SO ~T ALAmlS CAN BE !£ARD OVER L~R~ fH PROlll.91 DESCRIPTI~: Ml Vll.lJIE CONTROL PROVIDD IN CONTROL ROOM. UN PARAGRAPH ~BER: 6.2.1.6.E.1 6.2.1.6.E.2 Sl.66ESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE CR WITH LOUDSPEAKER \JOLLIE CONTROL. 11-1 DISPOSITION: REFER TO DS-12 (20N0111l,
- DATA cru..ECTIC.. DESCRIPTI!li ~ CODE OBER:
TP-2.1 COMJNICATIONS SURVEY REMRKS: C-6 IIDIS INVCL\JED:
~IIK MJMBER LOCATION COMPONENT tM SYSTE/4 SUBSYSTEM H r<<lT IN INV FILE 1
/
ttJA El'4lINEERIN:i DISCREPAt,CY REPORT '112./28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A1Mt3 INSTRtJI/CTRLS THAT REQUIRE CPS TO LEAVE PRIMARY OPERATIN:i AREA COMPLT 07/11/85 tUIAN ERROR:
DELAY IN (I) RESP(N;E. FAILURE TO DETECT* ABr<<lRIR CONDITIONS. j Hf PROll.9I DESCRIPTic>>4: LISTED INSTRUIVCTRLS REQ CPS TO LEAVE PRIM OP AREA. FIRE Ptt. LOCS CONSIDERED GREATEST IN:O NVENIEt<<:E. 8718 PARASRAPH N>>IBER: 6.1.1.1.B SU66£STED BACKFIT: Al>m.RTELY ST~F THE COHTROI. ROOM SO THE OPERATOR DOES NOT~ TO LEAVE THE PRIIIIARY (PERA TINS AREA. fH DISPOSITION: DELETE-ST~F C0NSIDER£D PART OF CRDR & BEEN FOUND AD£00ATE. BACKBD & LOCAL OPS 0 NIU SHIFTS. OP !'£ED NOT LEAYE. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE NUIU3ER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ Wl.IDATION REIIARKS: P.9.2-4. IIIOST ITEJIIS ON Pl-104 (29e01203) OR Pl-19 (20At3004) ITEJIIS INVO.\JED: NARK NJIBER LOCATION CQIIIPIJENT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM EHC LOW LYL ff NlT IN INV FILE f ElERS DIESEL H r<<lT IN INV FILE I FIRE DET SYS ff NlT IN INV FILE f NI ADJ INSTR H l<<lT IN INV FILE I SWTCHYD Ptf.. H r<<)T IN INV FILE I TURB SlJlERYS H l<<lT IN INV FILE 1 VENT PN. H NlT IN INV FILE f IEAntER Ptf.. ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
HUfl!AN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE 22All888 SHARED EllJIPIENT THAT HAS BEEN APROSWI SURRY UNIT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIIIENT STATUS a>>IPLT LAST REVIEW DATE U/11/85 HJIAN ERROR:
DELAY IN OBTAINING INFO. DELAY /ERROR IN OP RESPIN;E IN ABr<<lR IA. CC*DITI~ 1H PROILEM .11£SCRIPTION:
!HIRED EOOIPfENT ~ CAUSED SOI£ PAOfl.00 WITH ON OR BOTH ~ITS.
8708 PARAGRMi UBER: 6.1. 3. 1. E. 1 Sl&ESTED BACl(f IT: INVESTIGATE LISTED EQUIP AND PROVIDE SEPARATE EGUIP OR CTRLS AS NEEDED. 1t4 DISPOSITION: DELETE-EXISTING OP PROC FOR SHARED SYS GOVERN PROPER OP OF SYSTE/IIS. IF FOLLOWED, NO PROaBI WITH SYS. (R91ARKSl
- DATA COU£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.Jl!BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION REJflllKS: P.9.2-5. SEE P.9.2-7 < ~ l ITEJIIS INVCL\B: . MAK IOIBER LOCATION COflONENT PM SYSIDI SUBSYSTE/11 13 BER ll6 ff NlT IN INV FILE t BA XFER ff t()T IN INV FILE t
.IIIRON 11:RYY ff r.lJT IN INV FILE t C(ll)NT D..N6 ff f<<JT IN INV FILE t SAS WST SYS ff r.lJT IN INV FILE t RSRV STA SER ff NOT IN INV FILE*
VENT PN.. ff r.lJT IN INV FIL£
- HlJIIIANEreINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE 22Alll89 STATUS CF HIE> ElllIPtENT IS NOT DISPLAYED~ BOTH ~TRll. BOARDS RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS CQIIPt..T LAST REVIEW DATE
'6/17/85 ltJIAN ERROR:
MISINTERPffETATI~ Cf' EQUIPfENT STATUS. DELAY IN ASSESSI"3 PL ANT STATUS. ffl PRml.91 DESCRIPTI~: HRED EQUIP STATl.6 NOT DISPLAYED. BOP LIST D0ESN' T SHtMP IN BOTH ~ITS. CONTirt.OJS PlMT STATUS NOT IIIIINTAINED 17'11 PARAGRAPH r<<.JfmER: 6.1.3.1.E SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE STATUS Cf' SHARED EQUIPIENT ON BOTH CONTROL BOARDS. ffl DISPOSITION: DELETE- BACKBOARD IP IS PROVIDED TO JIIJNITOR SHARED EQUIPION BACKBOARDS> AND INFO RIii IP CF BOTH UNITS Cf' STATUS. DATA COL.l.£CTION D£SCRIPTI0N ~ CODE NUt&:R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION REMARKS: P.9.2-6 ITEMS INVCL\£Ih IIIIRK NJIIIBER LOCSlTI~ COPIPONENT rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM llJX FD PP ff NOT IN INV FILE f CIRC WATER ff NOT IN IIW FILE t CTMT HI RN6 ff NOT IN INV FILE f SfllKE DIS PN ff NOT IN IIW FILE t
tUIAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- t£D NO TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS
~T REVIEW DATE 22Allll8 MJDR L.AiE.S ARE NOT iuAYS USED HAE NECESSARY. II -6 08/87/85 lt.M ERROR:
IFCREASED SEARCH TlflE. ERROR IN CP RESP(ME. lff PROa.91 DESCRIPTI!l1:
!II£ IIAJOR SYSTE91 AND IP£RATOR WRKSTATIOO ARE f(]T IDENTIFIED BY fllAJOR LABELS, 8718 PARAGRAPH NlMBER:
- 6. 6. 1. 2. A. 1 SI.BESTED BACl<FIT:
ADD fllAJOR 1.ABB.S HR£ NECESSARY. ftf DISPOSITI!l1: REFER TO LABELIM; STUDY PHl2 (20Ae110ll *
- DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE ,._.A:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SUIMY ITEJIS IJM1.VED1
~RK tUIIER LOCATION COIIOENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEPI . LABELS H "3T IN INV FILE 1
ltJMAH ENGINEERING DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 02./28/86 SURRY LNIT2 CODE B ASS£SSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE . RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE . 22A81119 SlBJRDINATE LABELS ARE NOT It.WAYS USED HRE NECESSARY. EN6 II -6 BB/97/85 tUIAH ERROR: Ir<<:REASE SEAD TIME, ERROR. IN IJ) RESPCNiE. INHBITED LEARN I N6. 1H PROa.£111 DESCRIPTION:
!DE SUBSYSTEMS AND AKTic>>A. GRW>S ARE NOT IDENTIFIED BY SUBORDINATE LAB£LS.
0711 PAIIAGRAPH rtMBER:
- 6. 6.1. 2. A. 2 St&ESTED BACKFIT:
ADD SUBORDINATE LABELS WHERE NECESSARY. 1H DISPOSITI~: REFER TO LABELINS STUDY PI-82 12W1111),
- DATA COJ.ECTI()4 DESCRIPTI()4 AND CODE l'UIBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY IDAAKS: DS-33 ITEJIIS INYCl.VED :
~AK NNER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAIi£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII LABELS* H NJT IN INV FILE 1
tf.JIIAH EN6INEERirE DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW HED Nil TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al1111 A FEW C(Nl{JENTS lilVE Nil C(Jl!ll(J£NT LABEL. - II -6 e8/l7/85 ltJIAN ERROR:, THIE DELAYS. ERROR IN CllERATOR RESP!NiE.
'tff PROa.91 DE!l:RIPTIDN:
Tl£RE ARE AFEW COJIQ£NTS Tt'AT !-'AVE NI) COIIIPOr£NT LABEL 1718 PARAGRAPH OfER:
- 6. 6. 1. 2. A. 3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
ADD LABELS, tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABELirE STUDY PI-82 (28All181l *
- DATA COl.l.ECTIDN DESCRIPTION AND TP-6.1 LABELS ~ LOCATION CODE NUl&:R:
AIDS SURVEY
- RBIARKS1 DS-34 ITBIS INV(l.YED:
MRK IUIB£R LOCATION COIIIONENT PM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H NJT IN INV FILE f
/
lt1"AN EN6IN£ERitE DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86
- 22Qall ll I.ABELS REPEAT INFORMATicrt.
TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESS11£NT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 08/07/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESPONSE.
/
Hf PROfliN DESCRIPTIIJ4: SOME LABELS REPEAT Itf=O!MlTlON 6IVEN BY H16t£R-LEYEL LABELS. 1788 PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER:
- 6. 6. 1. 2. A. 4 S006ESTED BACl<FIT:
OIFY LABELLI"1 AS r£CESSARY, Hf DISPOSITICW: REFER TO LJma.IN6 STUDY PI-82 (20Ael10ll
- DATA CCllECTI!:.4 DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
~Rl<S:
Df,-35 ITEJIIS UMl JED:
!!Ala<~'~ LOCATI~ CQ!IIPO£NT ~ SYSTEIJ! SUBSYSTEM LABELS H r<<JT IN INV FILE t
IOAN ENiINEERirE DISCREPAf£Y REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22Allll2 SOE LABELS ARE NOT SIZED ACCORDirE TO TIEIR HIERARCHI~ LEVEL.
RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 88/17/85 IUIAH ERROR: 11£LAY IN LOCATIN6 C0IIIP()£NTS. 1H PROBlBI DESCRIPTI~: SOfE LABELS ARE NJT PR(J)ERLY SIZED/GRADUATED ~IN; TO Tf£IR HIERARCHI~ LEVEL. 1788 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.6.1.2.. B SI.E6ESTED 8ACKF IT: ENSURE LABEL LETTER SIZES ARE 6R~TED ACCORDir.G TO THEIR HIERARCHICAL LEVEL. 1H DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABELitE STUDY PI-82 <2A1101>,
- DATA ctLLECTI~ DESCRIPTini. iwD CODE NOO!ER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
~Rl(S:
DS-36 ITEMS IfMl.VED: _ NARK ~ LOCATION IDPOtOT tAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 1.ABEl.S. H t()T IN INY FILE t
ltJIIIAN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPA1£Y REPORT 02/28/86
. SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSIIIENT UlST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Alll14 SCIE umELS ARE NOT POS1Tl1)£1) TO PROVIDE ~TE LABEL USABILITY EN6 98/97/85 tUIAN ERROR, DElAY /ERROR IN READIN6/<P RESP(NE.
Hf PRCIILEJII Da:RIPTI~: SOI£ ~ T S ~ LABELS THAT ARE t<<JT POSITIMD TO PROVIDE ADEOOATE VISIBILITY OR BEST ASSOCIATIVE YJl.lE. 87N PA~ NJMBER: 6.6.2.1.A 6.6.2.1.B 6.6.2.l.C SU66ESTED JIACKFIT: REPOSITION/RELOCATE/RESIZE LABELS THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO SEE. LABS SHOULD BE PLACED FOR SRE ATEST VISIBILITY.
~ DISPOSITI~:
REFER TO LABELING STUDY PHl2 (20Ail10U
- DATA C(ll£CTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NlJIIIBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS ~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
~S:
DS-37 ITEMS IfML\IED 1 Ml< NJIIIBER LOCATII* COf!P(HNT NW£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t
tlJMN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86
- 22Al1117 SOE LABELS ARE r<<lT TITLE SURRY t(IRIZOOfUY ORIENTED.
~IT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSPENT STATUS CQIIIPLT LAST REVIEW DATE ea/97/85 IIMAN ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESPONSE. lff PROll.EN DESCRIPTI~: S(J£ LABELS ARE NOT lflRIZONTfUY ORIENTED. THEY INCLUD£ ABOOT 7tf. OF TI£ CONTRIJ.. POSITI~ UIIE.S. 87N PARAGRAPH rtl&R: 6.6.2.3.A.1 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: ENSURE fU LABELS ARE l()RIZONTIUY ORIENTED WHERE SPACE PERl!IITS. lff DISPOSITION: DELETE-LABEI.S ARE READABLE FOR CONTROL POSITIONS. r<<J ~TION NEEDED*
- DATA c:ru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI!l4 AND CODE OBER:
TP-6. 1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REIIARKS: DS-38 I1DS IfMl.VED: MIi< rullER LDCATI~ COIIIPC>>ENT NM:: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IIITARIES HNOT IN INV FILE f
lUIAH ENSINEERlNS DISCflEPA.t£Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED I()
22Aill18 CURVED LABELS SOETIIES USED. TITLE SURRY ~IT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS CORT LAST REVIEW DATE 08/U/85 IUIAN ERIOI: READirE ERROR CAUSirE DELAY/ERROR IN I)) RESPIIEE. Ht PROa9I DESCRIPTION: ABOOT 7t'/. IF Tl£ LISTED ITEPIS ~ CURVED LABELS. 071)8 PARAGRAPH DIER: 6.6.2.3.B SU66ESTED BAO(FIT: REPt.OCE CURVED LABELS. Ht DISPOSITION: - DELETE-OJRVED LABELI~ IS READABLE. I'() 1¥::TICN NEEDED*
- DATA ro.J.ECTICN DESCRIPTICN AND CODE OBER:
T~.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-39 IIDIS INVCl.lJED:
~RK NJIBER LOCATICN CDllONENT NAIE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM CI~ KTRS. ff t()T IN INV FILE t J~ ROTARS ff l'()T IN INV FILE t
ltJMAN EH6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- t£D t<<)
22Al1121 A FEW UIBELS ARE MISSPELLED. TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE 8 RESPONSIBILITY EN6 ASSESSIENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 08/97/85 IUIAN ERROR1 DELAY/ERROR IN IJI RESPCIEE. INHIBITED 1.£ARNIN6, DIFFICll.TY I N REFERRIN6 TO COl>Of'ENTS. 1H PRO!l.91 IIESCRIPTI()I: , FEW LABELS ~ MISPEI..LED l<<JRDS/ABBREVIATIOHS. 9788 PARAGRAPH NUABER: 6.6. 3.2. F SU66ESTED BACKFIT: CORRECT SPELLIN6 ERRORS. 1H DISPOSITION: REFER Tr LAPEL!~ STUDY PI-82 (28A0rn11> *
- DATA CCUECTICW DESCRIPTICN AND CODE ro!BER:
TP-6. 1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
- RE~RKS:
DS-~ ITEMS Ilf..il.VED: IIAIIK UJ:IER LOCATII* CQlll)(J£NT ~ SYSTE/11 SUBSYSTEM H t<<>T IN INV FILE t
tU!AN EN6INEERirE DISCREPAP<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- SURRY TITLE.
UNIT2 CODE B
~1121 Ull!ELS NJT CONSISTENT IN USE CF WRDS, ACRIIMIS, ABBREVIATIIN3.
REsmGIBILITY ASSESSIIIENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 97/15/85 IIIIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN (W) REsm&:. INilBITED LEARNING. j '
*'* PROllBI DESCRIPTII*:
LABELS ARE NJT CONSISTENT WITHIN AND ACIESS PIECES CF EQUIPIENT IN TI£IR USE CF hORDS/ACRO NYNS/ABBREVIATI~ 8711 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6.6.3.3.B
!UiSESTED BACKF IT:
CORRECT LABELING TO ENSURE COOISTOCY. DISPOSITII*:
*'* REFER TO LAIIELirE STUDY PI-82 (2All01) *
- DATA cru.ECTI!i. DESCRIPTION AND CODE tDBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATlON AIDS SURVEY
~ll<S:
DS-41 ITEJIIS INW..IJED1 IIAIIK tUIIER LOCATI~ COIIPIJ£NT NAfE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LABELS H NJT IN UN FILE f
IUIAN EN6INEERirf3 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 COIE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSPENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A81122 SYISl.S ARE l()T USED meISTENTLY. ENS II -6 08/(117/85 11.M ERROR:
ERROR IN CP RESP(HE. IffiIBITED LEARNlfti, fff PROaEJil DESCRIPTION: SOfE SYIIIBO..S .DO l()T ~ STlWIIARD C0ff'l6URATIONS AND smE ARE l()T CONSISTENTLY USED WITHIN
~ IMIE PANELS.
171e PARAGRAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.6.3,4,C 6.6.3.4.D SU66ESTED BACKFIT: CORRECT INCONSISTOCIES. 1+t DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABELirf3 STUDY PI-82 C2A1101),
- DATA ro..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-6.1 LAB8.S AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJW'.IRKS: DS-42 IIDIS UMLIJED: - MAK fUIBER LOCATION COIRJfENT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H l()T IN IW FILE t
~ ENSINEERING DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RE~IBILITV ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE
~1123 SCI£ LABELS USE ~ tUEIR.S, II -6 08/07/85 tUIAN ERROR:
READING ERRORS. Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: APPROX 5j CF LAB8.S US£ RO~ N.>>ERALS. 87N PARASRAPH OBER: 6.6.3.4.E SlESESTED BACKFIT:
~ ~ MJIIERALS WITH NI.JffllERS/LETTERS, Hf DISPOSITION:
REFER TD UUIELING STUDY PI-82 (20A0110ll TO ENSURE ALL ROMAN tUIERAL USAGE IS WI THIN INDUSTRY.COMNTION* DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIIIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-43 IIDIS INY0..IJED1 MIIK rtlfmER LOCATION COl'.PONENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H MJT IN IPN FILE
- HU~ ENGINEERING DISCREPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 a:me: B ASSES5.'!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A81124 Ulll£LS ARE NOT LOCATED A9:M Fl.N:TI!IA. GROOPS Tt£V IDENTIFY. II -6
- 18/U/85 IUIAN ERROR:
11£LAY IN LOCATihS cm1)()£NTS. IUSASSOCIATINi C0JllClr£NTS WITH WID6 LABEL tH PRQIUIII DESCRIPTI~: MNY SUBSYS/FIK SRW> LABELS ARE NOT~ ABOVE THE C()fl)(MNT SRO.PS THEY IDENTIFY. 0700 PARASRAPH NlJIBER: 6.6.3. 7.B SllJGESTED IW){FIT: PLACE UUE.S ABOVE SRO.PS. t-11 DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABEL!Ni STUDY PI-82 (20Ae110ll
- DATA CCllECTI~ DESCRIPTION ~ CODE l'UIBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS IWD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY RalARKS: DS-.44 ITEMS INW..VED: NARK ttJIIIBER LOCATION COIIIONENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LABELS ff NOT IN INV FIL.£ 1
HUflAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPAt£Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO . TITLE 221101126 CNTll. POSITICl4S NOT IDENTIFIED StJRRY
~
UNIT2 OJDE B SOE DISCRETE FIKTICNl. CONTRCl. RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSIENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 98/87/85 IUIAN ERROR: ItelRRECT CPERATI~ CF COfTRCL Ht PROll.9! DESCRIPTI~: CONTRCl. POSITIONS ARE t(Jf IDENTIFIED~ SOI£ DISCR£TE FU<<:TIIJA. CONTROLS. 07N PARAGRAPH IOll£R: 6.6.3.8.A SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: PROVIDE 1U CONTROLS WITH ~ROPRIATE POSITION IDENTIFICATION LABELS.
'*' DISPOSITION:
REFER TO LABELHE STUDY PI-82 (29A01l01)
- DATA CD..LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJll£R:
TP-6.1 LABa.S 1WD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMA~S: 6-1 SYSTE/ll StJBSYSTE/ll DISC ROTARS H r<<JT IN INV FILE t
t<<.JflAN ENSINEERIMJ DISCREPAtCY REPORT 192/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 alDE B RSSESSlllENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22All129 I.ETTER t£19ffS t<<JT SAIE FOR ill LABELS WITHIN SAIE HIERARCHICll. LI/ ENG II -6 08/07/85 ti.A ERROR: DELAY IN CP RESm4SE. HfHBITED LEARNIMJ. fH PROIUJII DESCRIPTION: L£TTER t£1SHTS I/ARY FOR LABEI.S CF Tt£ SAIE HIERARCHICAL LEVEL 071N PARA6JW)H NIJIBER:
- 6. 6. 4. 1, A. 2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
RELABEL TO ENSURE CONSISTENT LEITTR HEISHTS FOR ALL LABELS WITHIN THE SAIE HIERARCHI~ LE va.
'** DISP0SITIIJ1:
IIEFER TO LABEL INS STUDY PI-82 (2'JA01101 l *
- DATA C(UECTI~ DESCRIPTI!J1 AND rone l't.lABER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURI/EV REJIIARKS1 DS-45 ITEMS INYll.lJED: fARK IUIBER LOCATIIJ4 COfillOt£NT t'1IE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTE!II LABELS ff NJT IN IfN FILE f
ttJl!AN ENGINEERING DISCREPAJCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY lJHT2 CO~ B ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22All138 SOI£ LABELS tfWE LIGHT CHARACTERS ON A DARK BAO<SRCUUl. ENS II -6 08/U/85 tlM ERROR: READING ERRORS ..0 lifiITE ~RACTERS BE.COE COVERED BY DIRT/ SRI,£ AND LOSE C()ffRAST WITH BLAD< ~R<DD. fff PROBUll DESCRIPTION: SOI£ LABELS <1¥>PROX 15j) ~ LISHT CHA~TERS ()j A DARKBACKSROUND. 0700 PA~RAP!i OBER:
- 6. 6. 4. 1. B, 1 Sl.66ESTED BAD<FIT:
USE DARK CHA~TERS ON A LI6HT BACl<SROUND SUCH AS BLACK LETTERS ON lf!ITE. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABEL.INS STUDY PI-82 (20A01101) IOEVER, ESCUTOiEON PLATES WILL NOT BE etmE), MTA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUBER: TP-6,1 LABELS AND LOCATI~ AIDS SURVEY REJIIARKS: DS-46 ITEJIIS INVCl.VED1 IIARK tUIBER LOCATION C()IIJl()rNT PM SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII LABELS H r()T IN INV FIL£ I
~ EN6INEERHE DISCREPAACY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE 8 ASSESSlENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Alt1132 It<<:ORRECT ~ R WIDTHS USED FOR SOME LABELS. 00 11 -6 BS/17/85 IUIAN ERlllfl:
NISREADINS LA8ELS. Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~: SOIE LABELS~ CHARACTER WIDTHS THAT DO NJT eot.FDRl!I TD QJIOO..INE RECOIIENDATIOO. 87N PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.6.4.2.B, 1 6.6.4.2.B.2 SIJHSTED BOCKFIT: RELABEL AS t£CESSARY TO ENSURE lti L.ABaS HAVE CORRECT CHA~TER WIDTHS. Hf DISP0SITI~1 REFER TO LABELirE STUDY PI~82 <20A91101),
- DATA co..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUl'<<IER:
TP-6,1 LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
~S:
DS-47. LTR WIDTH TO 16ff RATIO SHOULD BE BET 1:1 & 3:5. ITEMS INVCI.\tl>: -
~IIK MJMBER LOCATI~ !nRIENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTE!JI H NJT IN INV FILE
- ttJA ENSIIEERINS DISCREPAN'.:Y REPORT 02/2B/86
- TITLE SURRY
~1133 SCIE LABELS HAVE IMPRCPER ~RACTER STRIJ<E-ijlDTHS.
1.WIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ENG ASSESSMENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 08/97/85 ltJIIIAN ERROR: IUSREADIN6 LABELS. 1H PAmUJII DESCRIPTIIJC: STID<E WIDTlt-T!rCHARACTER t£16HT RATIOS AR£ NJT BEn£EN 1:6 ~ 1:8. 07N PARAGRAPH PUIBER: 6.6.4.2.C SOOGESTED BACl<FIT: ENSURE LABEL CHARACTERS~ STROKE WIDTHS SUCH THAT THEIR STROKE WIDTH-TD-HEISHT RATIOS A RE BETIEEN 1:6 AND l :8 1H DISPOSITIIJC: REFER TO LABEL.INS STUDY PHl2 (2M01101) *
- DATA CCUECTILN DESCRIPTICJ4 AND CO~ NUMBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ITENS INVil.YED 1 IIARK ttER LOCATION CQlll)(Jt£NT NAIE SYSTE/11 51.JBSYSTEJII LABELS H f()T IN IIN FILE
- tlJIIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY U'4IT2 CODEC RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfllENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 221111135 TAIHlJT LABELS 00 t<<JT CLEA!l.Y IDENTIFY eollOENTS/EOOIPIENT. NOD III-8 08/97/85 ltJAI ERROR:
IDENTIFYING WROE EOOIP9ENT/C(N)()£NT AS BEINi OJT-IF-sERVIC E. Hf PRml.91 I£SCRIPTIC1H: TA6-WT UUIELS 00 t<<JT CL£ARLY/OCCURATELY IDOOIFY !IJT-(f'-SERVICE CllfllJ()£NTS/EOOIMNT. 0700 ~RAPH NIJIBER: 6.6.5.1.D Sl.8£STED BACKFIT: ENSURE LABELS CLEARLY/ACCURATELY ID£NT1FY !XJT-0:-SERVICEEOOIP/COl'IPCJENTS. SEE PI-86 (28All 201 II PI-87 (28A838I4I Hf DISPOSITION: RECOIIEND IIIIPWIENTIN6 COIIP\fTER SENERATEr, TA6-0UT SYSTEJII
- DATA Cll.LECTICIH DESCRIPTION AND CODE l'OIBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ITEJIIS INVCl.VED: fARK !OBER LOCATION COfllOte.T till£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TAS-OOT LBLS H NJT IN IrfJ FILE ~
tiJfllAH EHSINEERIN6 D1SCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY 22A81137 TBIIORARY LABELS 00 t<<IT eot=Ofllll TO SOOD It=
UNIT2 CODE B PRlfCIPLES. RESPl:WSIBILITY ENS ASSESS.'ENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 11.R ERROR: It<<:ORRECT/DEUlYED RESPC>>IS£. Hf PROIIL9I IIESCRIPTI~:
!DE TEMPORARY LABELS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ SlJ0-1 AS Tf<<lSE LISTED
- i7N ~RAPH UBER:
- 6. 6. 5. 1. A 6. 6. 5. 1. B S006ESTED BACKFIT:
REPLAC£ THOSE TEJIIP LABELS W/ PERPIANENT LABELS &DEVISE srnE IETHOD TO ENSURE TEJIIP LABELS A RE LESIBLE ll£N USED. 1H DISP0SITICl4: REFER TO PI-82 (28Ai11i1> LABELIIE STUDY*
- DATA ro..LECTICN DESCRIPTIOO AND CODE lfflBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-4. IIDIS IfMLIJED:
~RK tUl8ER LOCATI~ COlflO£NT MAfE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII )(EV IP ROTAR ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t LEGEND PBS ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t PROC CTll.S H r<<JT IN INV FILE
- tlJA EN6INEERil'E DISCREPAPCY REPORT 02/28/86
- l£D t() TITLE SURRY UNIT2 OlllE 22A81138 IEANIN6S CF A FEW N!)HESEND INDICATORS LIQlTS ARE t()T APPARENT, RESl)()elBILITY ASSESSPENT STATUS CCJR.T LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 It.JAi ERROR:
. MISINTERPRETATI~ CF IESSA6E.* IN:ORRECT RESP!MlE.
tH PROllEM DESCRIPTION:
~Il'E CF LIGHTS ARE r<<lT IIIIIEDIATELY l4>PARENT AND r<<l LABELS ARE USED TO IDENTIFY THEIR IE ANIN6 "9 LIT, 1718 PARAGRMi ro!BER:
6.5.3.2,A, l
!IJ66ESTED BACKF IT:
ADD lAIIELS TO IDENTIFY ~If& INTENDED BY LIGHTS lli£N LIT, tH DISPOSITION: DEl.£TE-SYSIDI PAS BEEN REIDIIEN>ED FOR ~ PER PI-117 (2\1111101113),
- DATA cru.ECTICl4 DESCR1PTICl4 AND OlDE NIJIBER:
TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-31-1 ITBIS INVCLVED: fAIIK rt.llBER LOCATI~ !Dll!HNT rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM WST DISP PN. ff r<<lT IN INV FILE f
/
ltR OOINEERil'E DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- HED r<<l 22A81148 TITLE LABELS l()T PERIODICALY CLEAfED, SURRY UNIT2 CODE C RE~IBILlTY ASSESSl£NT STATUS III-8 LAST REVIEW DATE 12/14/86 tUAI ERROR:
READINi ERRORS, DELAY IN IP RESPONSE.
/
ffl PRClll.EJII DESCRIPTJON: ADIIIINISTRATlYE PROCEDURES~ NlT BEEN ESTABLIStE> TO ENSURE PERIODIC CLEANING IF LABELS, 07N PARAGRAPH OBER:
- 6. 6. 2. 4. D SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
ESTABLISH ADIIIINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR PERIODIC CLEAN!~ LABELS. ffl DISPOSITION: ADMIN PROCEDURE 29 WILL ADDRESS THIS*
- DATA cw.ECTioi. DESCRIPTioi. ~ CODE OBER:
TP-6. l lJlBELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-3,l ~ICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW
~I DS-14 ITENS IIMl.1,tlh MAia< rtJN9ER LOCATION COfJQENT rA£ SYSTEM SUBSYST01 Ill CR LBLS ff NlT IN UN FILE I
ltJMH EhSIN£ERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 22M1141 MEMIN8S CF IDP LABEL ca.ORS Ir<<DEIST W/ ca.OR IEANINSS asatER RESPONSIBILITY r<<ID ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 tlJAI ERROR: .
NISINTERPRETATI~ CF LABEL flEANirf:i. tH PROILEN DESCRIPTION: SIJ£ RED AND YELL!M TBIPORARY LABELS lfWE ~Irf:iS THAT AR£ r<<JT CDEISTENT WITH 6UIDELir£S 6516C2 8718 PARA6RAPH tUIBER: 6.6.6.3 SJ66ESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE RED ~D YELLIJil COLORED LABELS FOLLOW 1£ANIN6S GIVEN IN SUIDELINE. tH DISPOSITION: REFER TO C-23 (22A01147l WHICH WILL GOVERN TE14PORARY LABEL DESIGN Ir<<:L.UDirf:i COLO R. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl.fflBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJIARKS: DS-17 ITEJIIS IrMl'.tlh
~RK ltJIBER
- LOCATI~ COllCl£NT M'.llE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H NJT IN INV FILE 1
tUIAH ENBifEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- HED f()
221181144 INSlFFICIENT W.TRCl. POSITION TITLE SURRY LABEL
~IT2 CODE A VISIBILITY.
RESPONSIBILITY NOD ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 11/38/86 ttJlllN ERROR:
~INS CONTROL IN WR(N; POSITION. DELAYED CPERATOR RESPIHlE 1H PROll9I D£SCRIPTIC1f1 llUE TO Cl*TRCl. LOCATION~ GUARD DESIGN, Tf£ COHTRCl. POSITION L.ABLES ARE NJT VISIIIL£ FRIii rt1RIR. CJ) POSITIIA 8718 PARAGRMi NJMBER:
6.6.3.8.C SU66£STED BACt<F IT: 1¥>PLY SWITOi POSITION LABELIN6 ClJTSIDE ~ ABOVE GUARDS. 1H DISPOSITION: VENT PNL: RELOCATE LABEL OOTSIDE IF COVER, REFER TO LABELING STUDY PER PI-82 (21 Alllil)
- DATA COL1.£CTION 11£SCRIPTION AND CODE NUIBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
~RKS:
DS-22 IT9IS lNYll.i.£1) I
~II< PUIBER LOCATION COlllaNT NAME SYSTat SUBSYSTat IIIV-2358 EAA282 DISCRETE ROTARY CONTAINENT WOJ!II SYSIDI BORATION VB2-I1I-c5 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t VBI-IV-29 ff NJT IN INV FILE t
HUMN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 02./28/86
- 22Alll~ IUE6Ill.E l.AllELLIN6, TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSIENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 KR ERROR:
READirti ERRORS. ~y IN IP RESP(NE. lff PROa..91 11ESCRIPTI1*1 SCJE IF Tl£ LISTED ITEPIS ARE DIFFICULT TD READ BE~ THEY ARE WRN OR ~ .ll£EN PARTI~ Y PAINTED OVER. t71i) PARAGRAPH rtJJIBER: 6.6.1, l
!IJ66£STED BACKFIT:
~/REPAIR LABELS AS r£CESSARY. ESTABLISH ADIIIIN PROCTO ENSURE LABELS REJIAIN EASILY IDE NTIFIABLE/AEADAll.E, lff DISPOSITI~:
REFER TO PI-82 (28A811t1),
- DATA cw.ECTICl4 11ESCRIPTICl4 TP-6. 1 LABELS ~
~ CODE UBER:
~TI~ AIDS SURVEY 119M(S:
DS-2J SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII WI> LABELS H N'.IT IN INV FILE t POSIT LABELS H N'.IT IN INV FILE I
HIJMH OOIIEERINS DISCREPAN'.:Y REPORT 02./28/86
- 22Ai1146 lrt:ORRECT l.ABEU.INi TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CO~ B RESPOEIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 KJIAN ERROlh DRfE1. W.:USION c:AUSIN6 DELAY/ERROR IN Ill RESPCNE.
H+ PflB.EN DESCRIPTION: COO'AlltlENT SIJI) LEVEL INDir.ATORS IOTH LABELLED LI-RS-251A. Cit£ IS Il'il!RRECT, SHCl.lD BE LI
-RS-2518 0718 PARAGRAPH rtlf!BER:
6.6.1.1 SlmSTED BAC1<F IT: RELABEL B D8fEL AS LI-RS-2518 H+ DISPOSITICJI: REFER TO LABELIN6 STUDY. PI-82 (28Aell01l *
- DATA cw..ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION
~AKS:
Vl-t ITENS ltMl.~Ih MAK !UBER LOCATICJI aJIIR>>ENT NAfE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEl!I Ll-RS-251A COO'AltfENT RECIRCt.lATIN6 SPRAY SYSTEM
tlllAN EN6Ir£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 82/28/86
- 22All147 USE CF TEJlllORARY LABELS IS TITLE SURRY LWIT2 CODE A NOT ADNINISTRATIYELY CCfflRW.ED, RESPONSIBILITY NOD ASSESSfENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 81/38/86 IUIAN ERIIOlh POOR DESCRIPTIVE IIJRDINS AND USE CF POOR ADt£5IYE COW) CAUS E ERROR IN INTERPRETATICW AND DElAY IN RESPOEE, Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~:
LACK CF PROCEDURES ENCOJRA6E POOR P~TICE IN LABEL.LINS (I, E,, ~y SORT OF TAPE AND J(JTATI *
~ cm..D SlFFICE>.
1718 PARAGRAPH NJIIIBER: 6.6.5,2,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: WRITE ADflINISTIIATIYE PROCEDURES CON:ERNIN6 IDPORARY LABELLIN6, Hf DISPOSITICl4: USE AND PUK:El£NT CF TEMPORARY LABELIN6 IS COVER£D BY ASTANDING ORDER, ENSURE E rt=ORCSENT CF STANDIN6 ~R* DATA COI.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE fOIBER: TP-6,l LABELS AND LOCATICW AIDS SURVEY
~RKS:
C-23 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM AllflIN PROC ff NlT IN INV FILE t
/
tUAI ENGINEERING DISCREPArCY REPORT 82/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY IJ'1T2 CO~ B RESPl)EIBILITY A$ESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22Ai1149 I~TELY LABELLED PROCESS ~TRCll.ERS ENS II -6 87/11/85 IUIAN ERROR:
IIISINTERPRETATI!>>i CF ~VE POSITION. PLOCING VALVE IN W~ 6 POSITI!h ,; Ht PROll£N DESCRIPTION: ILL PROCESS CONTRW.£RS DO t()T ~ POSITION INDICATION LABELS SU(}t AS *o* AND *c*. uae~OBER: 6.6.1.1 6.6.3.8.B S006ESTED ~IT: REaJliEND PlXING PERIIR£NT POSITION LABELS 000 PROCESSCONTROI.LERS. tff DISPOSITICW: REFER TO PI-82 (28AIU8U. Sl.66EST ADDING CLOSE-oPEN LABELIIE (SEE F-1 ON HED RE PORT>
- DATA COU£CTION DESCRIPTI!>>i AND CODE FOIIER:
TP-6,1 LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
~S:
DS-24 ITEJIIS INY(l\01
~RK UIIER LOCATic>>I COMPIKNT r9E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff NJT IN INV FILE 1
ltJfllN EN6INEERUE DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- l£D NCI 22All 158 Ml TBIIORARY LABEL REVIEW.
TITLE SURRY ~IT2 CO~ A RESPOEIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE
- 17/11/85 tUIAN ERlllR:
IIELAYED/Ir<<:ORIIECT DECISIIJE. IP., IU6HT ACCIDENTIUY ASSOCIAT EA LAIIEl. WITH Acn.TR<l./DISPLAY lffN 1£ !HlUlN1 T. ttt PROJl£N DESCRIPTIIII: Ill REVIEW PROC FOR IDP LABELS. .iA6f£TIC LBLS SETIMl!S LEFT LYIN6 ARCN.Nl OH CBS. 87N PARA6RMi NJIBER: 6.6.5.2.B Sl&ESTED BACKFIT: ESTAB ADIIIN PROC FOR REVIEWIN6 TEJIP LBLS. ESTAB POLICY TO ENSURE OPS R9KJIIE UNNECESS MAStE TIC L1l.S/TA6S FRCM CBS ttt DISPOSITIOH:
~ REFER TO C-23 (22Al1147) *
- DATA auECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS IWD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM BB SEC 2-1 ff NJT IN INV FILE t
~N ENBINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/17/86 SURRY UNIT 2 CODE A ASSESS!'IENT LAST REVIEW l£D I() TITLE RESPC>>6IBILITY STATUS DATE 22Aell51 MEANINGS IF A FEW IOH.E6END INDICATOR LIGtlTS ARE r<<JT APPARENT. II -5 83/17/86 KKlN ERROR:
,iISINTERPRETATION IF fESSOOE. Ir<<:ORRECT RESPONSE.
_.. PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION:
~ING IF LISHTS ARE r<<JT IMEDIATaY APPARENT AND NO LABELS ARE US£D TO IDENTIFY THEIR NE ANIN6 HN LIT.
1780 PARAGRAPH fUIBER: 6.5.3.2.A, l Sl.&STED BACl<FIT: li>D LABELS TO IDENTIFY ~IN6S INTENDED BY LISHTS WHEN LIT. _.. DISPOSITION: INSTALL CORRECT LENSES AS REUUIRED*
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP- 5. 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRl<S: DS-Je-2 I IDIS INVOL\/ED: LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAP!E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII 2-FW-P-JA AAB215 fETER FEEDWATER SYSTEM 2-Fw-P-38 MA216 IIIETER FEEDWATER SYSTEJII AJX &lJTilWN PNL ff t<<:JT IN INV FILE 1 PRZ Ill HTR A ff t<<:JT IN INV FILE 1 PRZ Ill HTR E ff t<<:JT IN INV FILE 1
H..lMAH ENGINEERING DISCREPAta' REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE C ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai1213 LHECESSARY CONTROLS/DISPLAYS ON CONTID. PAtELS, ENS III-9 "6/07/85 ti.MN ERROR: DELAY IN READING DISPLAYS, LOCATING CONTROLS. saECTION OR W
!DE CONTID.*. READING ~ WRONG DISPUlY, fH PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION:
CONTR(l.S/DISPLAYS LISTED ABOVE ARE UNNECESSARY OR AA£ NJT USED AND Sl-0.lD .B£ REl<<lVED 0A RE LOCATED. 8780 PARAGRAPH rtlfllBER: 6.S.1.1,C 6.4.1,1,B.l SUGGESTED BACKF IT: EOVE OR RELOCATE ~L I..NrECESSARY CONTROLS/DISPLAYS IN Tl£ CR. DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-60 (2@A03345) AND FOR CHART RCRDR FOR SYSTEJIFREIIJOCY SEE PI-187 (28 001103)
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4. l CONTROLS SURVEY REl'oARKS: P*.9.2-10 ITEMS INVOI..VED:
~AK tUIBER LOCATION CIJIPOtelT NAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII Al'IERTAP SYS ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 AUTO SYtOi ff f(IT IN INV FILE 1 BA TIN< ff NlT IN INV FILE 1 CK.. WTR SWS ff f(IT IN INV FILE*
CHLO CC PP H NlT IN IPN FILE t CONTS/DISPLS ff f(IT IN INV FILE f CST LYL CTRL ff NlT IN IPN FILE t DISC WI: PAii! ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f EXT sn, DRN ff NlT IN IPN FILE t
- FLASH EVAPS 6N FIELD 6RD ff ff r<<JT NlT IN IN INV IPN FILE 1 FILE 1
~ EH6Ir£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 HED NO: 22All213 ITEJIIS INVCl.VED:
MRK rtJMBER LOCATION C(]tlJ(JENT NAIE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM te .REC(IIIBS ff NOT IN INV FILE* LOAD FREQ CT HNOT IN INV FILE* LW r.AT REDIB ff NOT IN INV FILE* NIS PWR 11115111 ff NOT IN INV FILE* PMP Ai\lP MTRS ff NOT IN INV FILE
- PT l.NlTH ROD ff NOT IN INV FILE*
ROD CTRL LTS ff NH IN INV FILE
- S6 CHEJIIISTRY ff NOT IN INV FILE*
SYS FREQ RCR ff NOT IN INV FILE* TURB AUTO ST ff NOT IN INV FILE* TURB SUPERVR ff NOT IN INV FILE* WASTE EVAPS ff NOT IN INV FILE*
ENSINEERIN6 D1SCREPAt£Y REPORT 12/28/86 HIJfllAN SURRY UNIT2,. CODE ASSESSMENT l.AST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al1218 INSI.FFICIENT DISTIN6UI~ILITY BETIEEN LEGEND LTS ~ LEGEND PBS. Ctl!Pl.T 87/11/85 11M ERROR: J INCREAS£D TRAINING TUE. ERROR/DELAY IN IP RESPOEE. Hf PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: ILLUNINATED LESEND INDICATOR LI6HTS ARE t()T EASILY DISTINGUISHED FROil LESEND PUSHBUTTONS. 8780 PARAGRAPH NU!BER: 6.5.3.3.C SL66ESTED BACKFIT: A.OPLY SOfl.E FORM OF CODINS TO t£LP D1STIN6UISH PUSHBUTTONS FROM INDICATOR LISHTS. DISPOSITION: DELETE-DSP IELL-TRAINED/EXPERIENCED ON TURBINE PNLS. AREl<HOUD6ABlE AS TO WHICH ARE PBS* DATA COLl.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REfllARKS: DS~ ITEMS INVCl.VED: MRK NJIIIBER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM a£ TURB CTR ff r<<JT IN !NY FILE f SUPERY PANEL H MJT IN INY FILE 1 I
ttJMN OOINEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSES9£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al1213 I~TE ~TRCl.-DISPLAY INTEGRATI~ ENG II -7 17/11/85 1t.R ERROR: It<<:ORRECT RE~ j Hf PROJl.91 DSCRIPTI0N: CONTRn.. POSITION SE11.1£fa DOES MJT C01'FOl!III TO DISPLAY SEIHN:E <TlllMB ROTARIES W/ roH.E6E ND INDICATORS! 87N PARAGRAPH ttll!BER: 6.9.1.2.c.2 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: RELAB8../REWIRE SWITCES IN ORDER TO eoti=08" TO PROPER CONTROL-DISPLAY INTEGRATION.
... DISPOSITION:
REFER TO VD-15-2 (23Ai32lll *
- DATA Ctl.1.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION ANO CODE OBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RBIARKS:
.DS-15 IIDIS INVCl.VED:
flARK NUMBER UJCATI~ CQ!lllONENT NA,£ SYSTQ SUBSYSTEM THOOl ROTARS H "1T IN INV FIL£*
~ ENSINEERING DISC~Y REPORT 12/28/86
- HED t() TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A81381 INClHiIST IEANIN;/APPLICATIOO CF CO...OR CODIIE WITHIN/AIOE SYSTEMS ENS II -7 92/14/86 tUIAN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESP!HiE. Hf PROBLal DESCRIPTIIJ4: RED/AMBER NJT RESERVED FOR SPEC!~ ~IC. IEANIN6 CF COLORS kOT SAi£ WITHlN/AIOE SYSTEMS il780 PARAGRAPH N>>IBER: 6.5.1.6.C.2 6.4.2.2.F.1 6.5.1.6,D.3 6.5.1.6,D, 1 51.mSTED ~IT: REPLACE INCONSISTENTLY COLOR CODED LISI-ITS WITH LIGHTS WHICH CONFORM TO APPROVED CODING CON VENT ION. DISPOSITION: REFER TO L.ABa.IIE STUDY PER PI-82 (20A0111)1) TO ENSURE POSITION DESCRIPTIONS AND LISHT IEANINGS ARE CORRECTLY LABELED* DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fUIBER: TP-8, l CON'vENTIONS SURVEY TP-3,1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEfilS REVIEW TP-4, 1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-5.l DISPLAYS. SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATI!l'4 AIDS SURVEY TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION ~ VALIDATION REMARKS: 8.1-1. DIS?: L.AB8.1Pti ~SO TO BE IIJDIFIED. IIDIS INV!l.~D: -
~RK ruBER LOCATION CIJl){)ENT NAflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM t£Y-2244 F/¥!127 DISCRETE ROTARY C1£1111Cll. AND Y!l.LJ£ CONTRCl. SYSTEM HCV-2389 FAA126 DISCRETE ROTARY Q£IIIIC1l. AND \JOLLIE CONTRCl. SYSTEM LCV-2115A DAA126 PROCESS ~AW.ER 0£JIIICA AND VOUJE CONTRCl. SYSTEM TCV-2143 EM127 DISCRETE ROTARY DEIICAL AND IJOLIJE cnrnn SYSTEM
HUPIAN EN6INEERI1E DISCRE.PAtCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE 8 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t(] TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE W.1382 LIST IF ABBREVIATIIJE/ACRONYIIIS/TEf!IIIS NOT AIIMIN ~TRCllED, NOD I -4 V/6/87/85 tOAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OP RESP[M;E. H-1 PRO!l.EM DESCRIPTI~: ABBREVATIIHi c>>I JDIRD INCOOSISTENT W/ LIST IF ABBREV/OCRON/TERIIIS, I.E. OFTEN 2 ABBREV EXIS T FOR 1 WRD, 87il0 PARAGRAPH ru.BfR: 6,6, 3.3. A SU66ESTED 8ACKF IT: REWRITE LIST OF ABBREV/OCRON TO INCLUDE lU ABBREVIATIONJSED fN LABELS, AArU£IATORS, LESE NOS. l+f DISPOSITION: CORRECT AS PER BACKFIT*
- DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NI.MIER:
TP-8, l - CONVENTIONS SURVEY REJIIARKS: 8.1-2 ITEJIIS INVCl.VED:
~RK NlJIIIBER LOCATlc>>I C(M)(JfENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LIST H t(]T IN INV FILE t
ttJA EN6Il'£ERIN3 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CODE A ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 22A81383 NtN:IATOR ABBREVIATIONS INCONSISTOCY. EN6 II -5 16/17/85 IUIAN ERROR:
~Y/ERROR IN (II RESP<N,E.
fff PROaEJII DESCRIPTI~: IWUCIATOR ABBREVIATIONS ARE f()T COt6ISTENT WITH nm USED ELS8f£RE IN CR. 0701 PAROORAPH OBER:
- 6. 3. 3. 4. D S006ESTED ~IT:
EVAUJATE FEASIBILITY IF REENSRAVINJ ANN.Hi TO IIIAINTAIN CONSISTENCY WITH REST CF CR. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO ANfU£IATOR STUDY PER PI-85 (20A02106) *
- DATA Cll..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY RBIARKS: 8.-1-3 ITEMS INVOCVED: MAK l'UIBER LOCATION COIIPONENT NAIE SYSTBI SUBSYSTEM
~ ABBREV ff NlT IN !ff.I FILE 1
DISCRE11At£Y REPORT tC.R EtEINEERitiS .82/28/96 SURRY UNIT2 COM: A
~T LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A81~ DISTitCTIVE ~ T TE~Ill.ES ARE t<<JT USED FOR BIERS ~TRll.S ENS II -5 81/38/86 IUIAN ERROR:
DELAY IN LOCATil'E CORRECT Cl)fTRll. IN EJ11£RSOCY SITUATION. HI P ~ DESCRIPTION: Ir<<:OOISTENT COLOR SHADirt3/StM CODirt3 USED IN SAFETY RELATED SYSTOO. UN PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER: 6.8.1,3.D SIJ36ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE EACH EMERS CTR!.. W/ DISTIICTIVE EMRCEIENT SUCH AS RED LABELL.lrt3, CONTRB.. OR 6UARD HI DISPOSITION: LABELING WILL BE CONSIDERED IN !CB RELABELING STUDY, PER PI-82 (28A81101),
- DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIIBER:
TP-8. l CONVENTIONS SURVEY RENARKS: 8.1-4 IIDIS INW.VED: NARK M.JIIIB£R LOCATION COf!POrENT rM: SYSTEJII SUBSYSTBI TECHNIOOES ff t<<JT IN INV FILE*
EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT HUfllN 92/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B A$ESS1ENT LAST REVIEW HED l<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22AfU386 Ir<<:ONSISTENT IEANINS/~ICATION CF ctl.OR CODIN6 WITHIN/MJNG SYS ENS II -7 11/31/86 It.A ERROR: llELAY/ERROR IN IP RE~ Hf PROll.91 DESCRIPTION: RED/AIGIER r(JT RESERVED FOR SPECill. APPi.IC. IEANING CF aLORS NJT SAIE WITHIN/~ SYSTEMS 87N PARA6fH¥ltl ttiMBER:
- 6. S. 1. 6. C. 2 6. 4. 2. 2. F. 1 6, S. 1, 6. D. 3 6. S. 1, 6, D, 1 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT:
REPLACE: INCOOISTENTLY COLOR CODED LIGHTS WITH LISHTS WHICH CorEORPI TO APPROVED CODING CON VENTI!lE. fff DISPOSITION: LI6HTS WILL BE LAB£L£D AS TO THEIR l£ANIN6S. REFER TO LABEL STUDY PER PI-82 (29A 01101), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIB£R: TP-8,1 cnNENTIONS SURVEY TP-3,1 ANttJNICIATOR SYSTEl'IS REVIEW TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY TP-S,l .DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6,1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~~S:
- 8. 1-1.
ITEMS INYO..VED: NARK rtJMBER LOCATI~ COIPOfENT t<AE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM EHC TURB VLT H NJT IN INV FILE*
/
tUIW EN6It£ERIN6 DISC~ REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNJT2 CODE B 22A81317 INC(N;IST ll£ANIN6/APPLICATI1l4 CF CO..OR CODIN, WITHIN/AIDE SYS1BIS RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE 96/87/85 11M ERROR:
DEUIY/ERROR IN OP RESPCMiE.
/
Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTII*: RED/AMBER NOT RESERVED FOR S;)ECill. APPL.IC. IEANING OF COLORS NOT SAPE WITHIN/AIDE SYSTEMS 87N PARAGRAPH MJJIBER: 6.5.1.6.C.2 6,4,2.2.F.f 6.5.1,6.D.3 6,5,1.6,D.1 Sl&iESTED BACKFIT: REPIXE INCONSISTENTLY C!JLOR CODED LISHTS WITH LOI6HTS liiICH CON=ORM TO APPROVED CODIN6 CO NYENTI~
'** DISPOSITI~:
Et4ER6 DIESEL SEN t2 Po-lER fl!ONITDR LT TO BE DfMiED FRIJII RED TO WHITE*
- DATA C!l.LECTION DESCRIPT:114 AND CODE NUIBER:
TP-8.1 TP-3,1 TP-4.1 CONVENTIONS :.URVEY
~ICIATOR SYSTBIS REVIEW CONTROLS SIJ':VEY TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SUlVEY TP-6,1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIF.CATifJ4 AND VALIDATI~
~Rl<S:
8.1-1 ITEJIIS INVOlVED: MRK rtJIIIBER LOCA Tlll4 COIIPONENT NAfE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM EDG PWR !ION ff NOT IN IrN FILE 1
tUIAN EN6INEERIMi DISCREPAPCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al1388 O.SIST IIIBININ6/APPLICATION IF ca.OR CODING WITHIN/AIOti SYSTEMS ENS I -1 11/11/85
~ ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IJ) RESPaEE. fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: RED/All!BER f()T RESERVED FOR SPECI/l. ~IC, IEANIMi OF COLORS f()T SAi£ WITHIN/~ SYSTEMS 8708 PARAGRAPH rtJMBER: 6,5,1,6,C.2 6.4.2.2.F.1 6.5.1,6,D,3 6.5.1.6.D, 1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
~ JNCOOISTENTLY COLOR COD8l LIGHTS WITH LIGHTS WHICH CONFORfl TO APPROVED CODIMi CON VENTIIJ4S.
Hf DISPOSITION: R80VE t£AT TRACING LIGHTS FRQIII CONTROL ROOt COORDI~TE WITH Pl-187 (281183),
- DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJMBER:
TP-8, 1 CIJMNTIONS SURVEY TP-3.1 Arfi.lNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW TP-1+.1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6. 1 LABELS ~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION RE.IIARKS: 8.1-1 ITEP!S INYO..VED: *
~RI< NOO!£R LOCATION ~ T NAfE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII FLOOD CNTRL ff NJT IN INV FILE f t£AT TRACINS ff NJT IN INV FILE 1
ttM OOINEERINS DISCREPAfO' R£PORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW HED I'll TITLE RESPONSIBILITY. STATUS DATE 22Al1389 ILLCEICR. AR~TS IF aMROLS AND DISPLAYS. t()NE . 87/11/85 IUIAN ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATI~ IF VALVE POSITION. It<<:REASED SEARCH TJIIIE, IraEASED REI.IKE I:.. l80RY. fff PROBLEM IIESCRIPTI~: REHTR CTRL SYS LES IND LTS fVVtl/2/3/4) <BB SECT 2-2> HAYE CLOSB> ABOVE OPEN IND (NOT CONS ISTENT W/ CCJNENTIONSI 0790 PARAGRAPH ttJIIIBER: 6.8.2.2.A SU66ESTED BACKF IT: REWIRE AND RE-EM3RAVE ALL FOUR LEsa.D INDICATOR LIGHTS SO TtflT OPEN INDICATOR IS ABOVE CLO SED INDICATOR. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE~TIOJSH POSITlCWS ARE INCORRECT, TH£ CLOSB> Ll6HTS ARE GREEN, OPEN ARE R
- ED*
DATA COU.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl.JIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY REJIIARl<S: DS-27-1 ITEMS INVCl..VED: IIARI< OBER LOCATION O)l)()NENT fM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RHTR CTRL SY ff t(JT IN IW FILE f
KM ENSINEEIUrE DISCAEPfM:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CO~ B 22A8131i ILLOOI!A ARRANSEMENTS C>>= Cll4TRCX.S AND DISPLAYS.
RESPONSIBILITY ENS
~T STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW
.DATE 87/11/85 tUIAN ERROR:
,usINTERPRETATION C>>= VAL.VE POSITION. IN:REASED SEARCH THIE.
INCREASED RELIIKE ON IEIORY, fH PROIUJII DESCRIPTION: SOtE NJT IN IU>lfU!ETIC ORDER, OTl£RS ~ 1 A1 LOCATED TO Tl£ RI6HT OF 8. 0708 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.8.2.2.A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: SWITCH LOCS SO A IS LEFT AND B IS PUDDLE AND C IS R1SHT. t-lf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-19 !22!=23826) !VENT PANEL> AND PI-117-3 !29803816),
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJ111BER1 TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-8.1 CCNVENTIONS SURVEY /
REMARKS: DS-27-2 I TENS INVCl.VED:
~RI< ttJIIIBER LOCATION CD,llONENT rM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 1-YS-E-4A QAA847 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEM 1-YS-E-48 GAA845 LI6HT VENTILATic>>I SYSTEM ~-YS-fl183A XA48 LISHT VENTILATION SYST01 l-YS-fl1038 XBAe46 LISHT VENTILATic>>I SYSTEJII l-YS-fl183C XABM6 LIGHT VENTILATION SYSTEM 1-YS-flliJD XABl47 LISHT VENTILATION SYSTEJII 1-VS-P-lA RAA047 LI91T VENTILATION SYSTEM
- l-YS-P-18 RAAi45 LIGHT VENTILATION SYSTEJII 1-YS-P-2A RBA047 L1SHT VENTILATION SYSTEM l-YS-P-28 RBA045 LIGHT VENTILATION SYSTEJII, 2-YS-F-lA NAA846 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEM
KM EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- t£D r<<J: 22Al 1311 ITEJ!IS INVO..VED:
MRK NUflBER LOCATION CQIIIQENT r9IE SURRY UNIT2 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM 2-YS-F-1B NAA045 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATitw SYSTEM 2-YS-F-lC NAB845 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATICW SYSTBI. 111JV1-P6-117A ff "1T IN INV FILE
- IIIV1-P6-1a7B ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t
ttJIIIAH ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPAra' REPORT 82/28/86
- 22A81783 'A JE INADYERTENTLY CLOSED.
TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS CDR.T LAST REVIEW DATE 17/11/85 MM ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. <If!IPRCPER VALVE Lil'ELIP>. Hf PROa.EN DESCRIPTION: 2-cH-226 WAS INADVERTENTLY CLOSED MKIN6 M OF 00 BORIC ~ID FL~ PATHS TO THE CORE Ira> ERABL.E. 8788 PARAGRAPH NU!l!BER: 6.1.1.1.A SU66ESTED BACKF IT: ENSURE Al)tlfIN CTRLS IN PUCE. Ell'HASIZf THE IfllPCIRTANCE OFF1ll0WIN6 PROCEDURES TO PERSONNEL. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-NOT IN CRDR SCCJ>E, PERHAPS LABaIN6 RECOfllllENDATIONS FOR !CR WILL BE CONSI DERED FOR IIIIPl.9IENTATIOH Lem.LY
- ~TA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATI~
~ CODE NUJIBER:
~RKS:
. HR-IS. WRITTEN FRCJIII :...ER-81-001/eJl..--0 IT£111S INVll.lJED 1
~RK NUflBER LOCATION COl!PONENT rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H r(JT IN INV FILE 1
- Ht.A EN6IN£ERI~ DISCREPA,JCY REPORT 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED Ml TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A817M OVERFILL CF "B" SAFETY INJECTI()I ACCUUATOR. I -2 87/11/85 H.A ERROR:
ERROR IN OP RESPCIEE. / I fff PROBL.£111 DESCRIPTI()I: CR IP£RATOR INADVERTENTLY FILLED THE "B" ACClJOJlTOR 1. 7'/. ABOVE MXIIUI. 0700 PARAGRAPH Nli'BER: 6.3.1.2.A.2 St.66ESTED BACKFIT:
~UATE ALAR,! FUtCTION.
fff DISPOSITION: ZONE MRKINSS TO BE ADD8> TO MTRS LI- 0-920/922/924/926/928/938 TO AID OP IN DET ERl!IININ6 ACrul LVLS. IREJIIARKSl DATA COl..1.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJMBER: TP-3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSTE,!S REVIEW RtMRKS: HR-5, WRITTEN F~ LER-82-031/0.-fl. SEE E-7 (21A02229l. IIDIS INVOLVED: MRI< tOIBER LOCATION IDPOfENT NA,£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM H f(JT IN INV FILE*
tlJIIIAH EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED t<<l TITLE 22A82822 ~TER STYLE USED~ DISPLAYS t<<lT CIJEISTENT.
SURRY LtHT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfENT STATUS CIJIA.T UIST REYIEW DATE 17/15/85 KM ERROR: DELAY IN CP REsmEE. fff PROa.91 DESCAIPTI~:
~ STYLE N'.IT COOISTENT - LllER CASE LETIERINS.
1711 PARAGRAPH NUMBER:
- 6. 5. 1. 3. B. 2 6. 5. 3. 3. B, 2 SOOGESTED BACKF IT:
CORRECT Cl4!RACTER STYLE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER DISPLAYS.
... DISPOSITION:
DEL£TE - DISPS EASILY REAl>-LETIERIN6 LARGE & Cl.EAR. l'<<l PROBWI W/ LESIBILITY, LO WCASE APPRCP FOR ~IT ABBREVS. DATA cru.£CTION De:SCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJMBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: JP-3. (AU. METERS IN RAD MON CABS IIENTIClfED,) IT91S INYCl',{I): . JIIARK NUMBER LOCATI~ COMPOr.ENT ff>>£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RAD IIJN 1-2 ff f(IT IN INV FILE t RAD O 2-1 ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t llAD O 2-2 ff l(JT IN INYFILE t RADO C(Jf4 ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t RI RMS 127 8 ff NlT IN INV FILE t RI RJIIS 128 P ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t RI RMS 22.7 0 ff NlT -IN INY FILE t RI RfllS 228 P ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t
lt.JIIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCRE~Y REPORT 93/17 /86
- HED N'.I TITLE SURRY ~ IT 2 alllE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSES5'1ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A02823 IIAJOR i:wD ll!INOR 6RADOOTIONS NOD II -6 85/82/85 KM ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IJ> RESPCHlE. Hf PROB1.B1 DESCRIPTION: PruOR iwD l!Ir()R GRADUATIOO SHCll.D BE USED IF IJ> TO FOUR GRADUATIONS BETWEEN N.JIERALS ON S al.E. 17S0 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6.5.1.5.A.2
- 6. 5. 4.1. C SUG6ESTED BACl<FIT:
alRRECT OR ADD THE ll!AJOR AND l!Ir()R 6RADUATIONS WHERE NECESSARY. DISPOSITiON: ADD ~ INTERMEDIATE GRADUATION (HEAVIER LIN£) FOR EACH VALUE OF 10
- DATA CfUECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP- 5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY
~Rl<S:
JP-8. ITEIIS INVCk..VED: LOCATION COPIPONENT ~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEPI PI-lllt-i?elA LAA310 IETER LEAl<ASE l!0NITORIN6 SYSTEM Pl-l,-_281B LAB311 IETER 1.EAKA6E l()NITORINS SYSTEII
H!Jf!AN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/26/86 SURRY UNIT 2 CODEC ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A02024 MJ, INTERl'I; "IN BRADS SHOULD BE USED IF ll!ORE TH,:W 5 BRADS BET NOS NOD II -7 03/26/86 HUMAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OP.RESPONSE.
*** PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:
MJ, INTERM, l'IINOR BRADUATIONS NOT USED WHEN THERE ARE FIVE BRADUATIONS BETWEEN NUMERALS. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUl!IBER: 6.5.1,5,A.3 6.5.4.1,C SU66ESTED BACKFIT: ADD NINOR, INTERFIEDIATE OR f!IAJOR BRADUATIONS WHERE NECESSARY. DISPOSITION:
*** REDESIGN AND REPLACE SCALES OF LISTED PUMP A,IMETERS TO IMPROOVE READABILITY.
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl!IBER: TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REPIARKS: JP-9 ITEl'IS INVOLVED: fllARK NUPIBER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAl'IE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 2-BC-P-lA AAAl 13 METER BEARING COOI..INS NON-RADIOACTIVE SYSTEM 2-cti-P-lC FAA125 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEMICAi. AND VOLUIE CONTROL SYSTEM ~RGINS 2-FW-P-3A AAB215 . METER FEEDWATER SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD
~ EM3INEERIN6 DISCREPiKY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A82825 l,qUES INDICATED BY ~IT 6RADLVnI!l4S. II -6 e5/12/85 1-tM ERROR:
D£LAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. H4 PROBLEN DESCRIPTI~: VALLES INDICATED BY ~IT GRADUATIONS DO t(JT PROORESS BY 1,2,s,10 OR nm VIUES IU..TIPLIE D BY !DE PIJER OF 10.. 07110 PARASRAPH NUflBER: 6.5.1.5.A.3 6.5.4.l,C SUSGESTED BACl<F IT: CORRECT VALUES OF UNIT GRADUATIONS TO PROORESS TO 1,2,5,10 OR THOSE VALLES MULTIPLIED BYS CME ~R OF 10.
~ DISP0SITic>>4:
REDESIGN AND REPLACE SCALES TO IPIPROVE READABILITY*
- DATA ctUECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY Rf/4A~S: JP-10 ITEMS !NW.UED: MRK ~UIBER LOCATION COOINENT NAIE SYSTEI, SUBSYSTEM FI-205A OBB310 IIIETER SERVICE WATER SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-28SB 008311 METER SERVICE WATER SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD Fl-CC-204A NM315 METER CIJIIIP()£HT COO.INS SYSTEM REACTOR COOt..ANT PlJlll)S FI-CC-21.\B ~15 METER CO!PC>>ENT COO.IN, SYSTEM REACTOR coo.ANT PIJIPS FI-CC-2MC PAA315 METER COMPOt£NT COO.INS SYSTEM REACTOR coo...ANT PUMPS FI-CC-289 OOA423 METER CCJUlOt£NT COO.IN, SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-CC-216 NAA425 PIETER COl'Cl£NT COO.ING SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-FW-298A ff l()T IN :NV FILE 1 Fi-FIH!00B ff t(JT IN :NV FILE 1
- FI-FW-2N: ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FI-VS-118 H f()T IN .lfJ FILE 1
!lJflAH EN6INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A82t26 POINTER TIPS !Hll.D BE SIJlllLE, COO..T 17/1S/85 ttM ERROR:
ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.
/
fff PROBI..EII DESCRIPTION: POINTER TIPS StO..lD BE SELECTED TO MIN1'1IZE COfC8UIENT CF SCU: 6RADUATION MARKS OR NJIIER ll.S. 1780 PARA6RMi ttlfl!BR: 6~5.2.2.A.2 SU6GESTED BACKFIT: REP!...AC£ WITH Sill>LE POINTER TRIPS COM=ORPHNG WITH 0700 6UIDLINES. fff DISPOSITION: DEL£TE-5DUS EASILY READ, EGUIP BEEN REIIOYED FRI>>! CB. NR-246/247 POINTERS COYE R UBERS, IREMARKS> DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE tOIBER: TP-5.1 DISPI..AYS SURVEY fel:IRKS: JP-13. DISP: BUT RCRDRS ARE US8) FOR HISTORI~ DATA CK.Y. IIDIS INYll.VED: MARK IUBE:R LOCATION CO!POIENT '9IE SYSTEM SUBSYST01 CR-5520i ff f()T IN INV FIL.£ t CR-BS211 ff NlT IN INV FIL.£ t / NR-246 ff NlT IN INV FIL.£ t NR-247 ff hOT IN INV FIL.£
- RAD JION CQIIIN ff f()T IN INV FIL.£ * .
RR-150 OM732 RECORDER RADIATION IOHTORitE SYSTEM RR-2ee OM712 RECORDER RADIATION MJNITORINS SYSTEM RR-251 OAA762 RECORDER SERVICE WATER SYSIDI TS Ul2 LOAD f f f()T IN INV FILE*
- TR BR 129 TR-2448 ff ff hOT IN INV FILE*
NOT IN INV FILE t
HlM EN6INEERit.6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 82/28/86
- HED t<<:l: 22A82926 ITEMS INVCl.VED:
SURRY ~IT2 IIARK ru.BER LOCATil:i. COIP.lENT ~ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM WST DISP PN1. H t()T IN INY FILE*
tlM ENiINEERING DISCREPAhCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED t(} TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSJIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 2.2A02827 INDICATICN NEEDED IN ~Rll. RCDI. II -6 V/6/07/85 IUAI ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPtWSE. Hf PROll.EM IIESCRIPTICN: INDICATIONS LISTED ARE r££DED IN CONTRB.. RCDI. 0700 PARASRMi UBER: 6.5.1.1.B Sl66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE INDICATIONS NEEDED BY CPS TO THE ct){TRCl. .BOARD, Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-n <20A02005> COVERED IN PREVIOOS HED*
- DATA Cll.LECTICN DESCRIPTICN AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VE:RIFICATIOH AND Wl.IDATION REJIIARKS: P.9.2-9 IIDIS INIJCl.VED 1
!!ARK tUIBER LOCATION C!lMP(}f£NT NAME SYSTEJII SUBSYSIDI BR COO.. HD ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 CMPT APR.OOS ff OOT IN INV FILE 1 CRTS ff OOT IN INV FILE 1 EXC LTu. FLO ff t()T IN INV FILE f FD RES BY FL ff OOT IN INV FILE 1 FF LCM PWR ff OOT IN INV FILE t IMDRE TIC ff l'()T IN INV FILE 1 INDICATICN ff t()T IN INV FILE t lf4 LUB OIL T ff t()T IN INV FILE t
- *NR Sn! EFFLU ff t()T IN INV FILE t S6 LV RCR ff l'()T IN INV FI LE t
~ EN6INEERIN6 DIS::REMt<<:Y REPORT 12/28/86
- ITE,5 INYCLYED:
MRI< NJIIIBER LOCATI~ C()IP()ENT NAfE SURRY UNIT2 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM RX VSL LVL ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t STM FLCM ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t
HlJMN EN6INEERIN6 D1SCR£PAICV REPORT 02/28/86
- HED r<<) TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIEHT STATUS CORT LAST REVIEW DATE
~ 8 RElllJOWT Atft.lCIATORS ~ RECORDERS. Vlfl/U/85 tt.llAN ERAOR:
DE~Y/ERROR IN CP RESPCMiE.
- Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:
TOO MANY REDUNDANT ANtK:IATORS, CONDl.£TIVITY RECORDERS l(JT NEED£D. 0700 PARASRM-i l'UIBER: G.5.1, 1,D SU36ESTED BACKFIT: REJIOVE ~ T IMUCIATORS ~ RECO!iDERS Tl4lT ARE NOTf£EO£D. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE~IATOR STUDY TO BE DOE: <Pl-85, 2eA02106) CONDUCTIVITY RECORDERS ARE NEEDED* DATA cru..ECTION DESCRIPTION~ CDDE ll!MBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VAL:DATION
~Rl<S:
P. 9. 2-11 IIDIS INVll. VED:
~RK l'OIBER LOCATION~- NAIi£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 2 CONDUC RCD ff "1T lH INV FILE t At'IUCIATORS ff r<<JT 'N INV FILE*
IUIAH ENSINEERINi DISCREPIM:Y R£PORT 02/28/86
- HED NJ TITLE SURRY LWIT2 CODE*A 22A82929 DISPLAYS NJT LABELLED TO INDIC ffTHER ACTIR. ORDBRal STATUS, RESPCH,IBILITY N)I)
ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE t6/87/85 IUIAN ERROR: IIIISIHTERPRETATI~ OF DI!PLAYED INFORfllATIOH, fff PROlll9I DESCRIPTION: . U DISPLAYS r<<JT LABaL£D TO CLEARLY* INDICATE lf£THER Tl£ DISPLAYS IS OF ACTIA. OR DEMAND STATUS. 8710 PARAGRAPH NUIIIBER: 6.5. l. l.E. l SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: LABEL DISPLAYS INDICATI~ ltlETtER THE DISPLAY IS~ ACTIA. OR~ STATUS, fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-108 (2008111il4, 111116, 1187> i II DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE !UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.lDATION RE!flRKSs P. 9. 2-12 ITENS INVCLIJED: MRi< NJIBER LOCATION COIPONENT rAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM u l£VS .ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t DISPLAYS ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t RX TRIP 1DUT ff NJT IN INV FIL£ t
tUAI 8EINEERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CODE ASSESSfENT LAST REVI84 TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~ r<<l POSITIVE INDICATil)I ~T INSTRIJIENTS f4IVE FAILED, COR..T 07/11/85 11.JAt ERROR:
IIISINTERPRETATil)I Of DISPLAYED INFO. Hf PROllBI DESCRIPTI~: r<<JT ~WAYS POS INDIC Tl'AT IHSTRUM ~ FAILED/.BECOE INOPERATIVE. IU PITAS 00 r<<JT FAIL OfF SCIU; SOME FAIL AS IS 87~ PARAGRAPH ~R: 6.S.1.1.F SU66STED BIO<F IT: PROVIDE A POSITIVE INDICATION Tf41T AN INSTRUIOT HAS FAILED OR .BEOOE IrffiRATIVE. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-DPS TRAIN£D TO RECOONIZE FAILURE, fl!TRS RE.IXJHDANT.NOT LIKELY BOTH WILL FAI L. ON.. CHECKS EA SHIFT !RBIRKSl DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JIU!ER: TP-9,2 \JERIFICATll)I ~ IJALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: P.9.2-15-1. DISP: CHECKS ARE EA WEEK DURING SHUTDOWN IIDIS INVCl.VED: IIIARK NI.Jf!BER LOCATICJI CO!POrENT ~ SYSTB! SUBSYSTEM Nl-l-3SB H t()T IN INV FILE f Nl-l-368 H r<<lT IN INV FILE t / NI-2-3SB FAB287 IETER NW.EAR IHSTRUl£NTATION SVSTB! NI-2-36B FAC2e7 IETER t<<lEAR INSTRIJIENTATil)I SVSTEJII
HUMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCIIEPAf(;Y REPORT
- 02/28/86. :_*, .
SURRY LtHT2 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82831 DISPLAYS P<<JT PRECISE OR ACCURATE EtO.Qi, ENS I -2 V!61e11as HJIAi ERROR: ERROR IN Cl>ERATOR RESPONSE*
._.. PRtlLEM DESCRIPTION:
DISPLAYS LISTED DO NJT PROI/IDE Tl£ PRECISION OR OCCURACY REQUIRED WHEN USINi THEM. e1ee PARASRAPH NlJIIIEER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. A St&iESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE SREATER PRECISION OR OCCURACY FOR Dis:tAYS.
._.. DISPOSITION:
REFER TO HR-6 (22A05Nf>l. REPLACE SCIU
- DATA CO.J.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE l't.lMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATICIH REJIIARKS: i P.9.2-16-1 ,1 I ITEMS INVCk.VED: - MRK fUIBER LOCATION CQllllOr,ENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSVSTEJII TI-c5:-281A WITAirfENT SPRAY SYSTEM TI-cs-2888 al4TAittENT SPRAY SYSTBI
IUIAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASS£SSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82132 DISPLAYS THAT REQUIRE SO£ FORM OF mNERSION. t<<JD II -7 17/11/85 tlM ERIIOR: ERIIOR IN INTERPRETING. DELAY /ERROR IN RESP(NE. fff PROllBI DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED REQUIRE SOIE FORM OF WNERSION IN ORDER TD EFFECTIVELY US£ INFOR!IIATION. 0711 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5.1,2,B SLG6ESTED 8":KFIT: ClilN6E SCIUS OR PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS FDR DISPLAYS REllJIRIN6 CONVERSIONS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-110 (~7, ET.AL.)
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP-9, 2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATICIN REMARKS: P. 9.2-18-1 ITBIS INYCl.VED: IIIARK NUMBER LOCATION COfRJM:NT tM: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM MST ff "1T IN INV FILE t BORON RCVRY ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t COUJRIETRIC ff t()T IN INV FILE t ECST ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t FEED .FLCII ff t()T IN INV FILE I RWST ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 SI~ LVL ff t()T IN INV FILE t STII FLIJ,l ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 WIND DATA f f f(JT IN !NY FILE 1
tlM OOINEERIN6 DISCREAA'CY REPORT 02/28/86
- :ITLE SURRY ~IT2 CODE 22Al2tJ3 DISPLAYS ~T IO..lD BE lf a=t.l IN smE. OTHER Vil.LIE, RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMEHT STATUS COMPLT LAST REVIEW DATE 06/97/85 ttM ERROR:
IUSINTERPREi ATI~ IF JISPLAYED INFO, l'IISREADIN6 Cf' DISPUlYS. Hf PROBl8I DEstRiPTI~: DISPLAYS LISTED 1,()1.l.!) BE IIORE USEFUL IF INDICATED IN SOIE OTl£R VALUE.
@700 PARA6'~ MMBER:
6.5.1. '!.C Sl.6GESTEJ BACKFIT: Df¥.'<<x SCIU TO PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS,
.._ DISPOSITI~:
DaETE-fLOW IN Cfll IS ,ORE DES1RABU*
- C+lTA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATIOO R9IAR1<S: P.9.2-19-1 IIDIS INVO..VED:
~RK NUMBER LOCATI!Ji COfllO£NT NAflE SYSTEII SUBSYSTEII CTlfi VAC PP H NH IN INV FILE
- ttJA E.N6INEERIN6 DISCREPAM'.:Y REPORT 02/28/86
. SURRY ~IT2 CODE ASSESSfENT I.AST REVIEW TITLE RESPtWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82834 DISPS r<<>T ~TE IN RANGE, r<<>T Sl.JIPORTED BY AUX INSTRlJENTATI~. roRT '116/07/85 tUIAN ERROR:
IIISINTERPRETATICIN Of' DISPLAYED IN='O, IIISREADIN6 CF DISPlAY. lff PROll.9I DESCRIPTION:* DISPLAYS f()T ADEOOATE IN TERMS Cf' RAN6E OR ARE f(IT SUPPORTED BY AUXILIARY lNSTRIJIIIENTATll>>t. 0708 PARAGRM-i NIJIBER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. D, 3 S006ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCUS/INSTRI.JENTATlClt. fff DISPOSITION: DEL£TE,-RAN6E ADEOOATE. 5aU 1-480, CN.Y USE MTR TO VERIFY THAT PRESSURES IS SRE ATER THAN 2N SO RCPS CAN IRMRKl MTA CCUECTICIN DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.>>IBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATICIN AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DI~'r'S SURVEY REMARKS: P.9.2-20-1, DlSP: BE STARTED I TEJIIS INYO..'JED: IIARK NUIIIBER LOCATION Cl)Jl()fENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RCP s&. H f()T IN INV FILE t
llJIIIAH ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/17/86 SURRY ~IT 2 CODE B ASSESSfl!ENT LAST REVIEW HED I'{) TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A02847 POOR DISPlAY DESIGN ENS II -£ 83/17/86 IU'.AN ERROR: READIIE ERRORS.
~ PROBWI DESCRIPTION:
CORE COOLING OITOR ~ VERTICALLY ORIENTED NJJERALS. 1700 PARAGRAPH MJMBER: 6.5.2.4 SOOGESTED BOCKFIT: RE-ORIENT P<<..HERALS (SPACE-coNSTRAINEDl. RE-ORIENT DISPLAYS TO VERTICAL..
... DISPOSITION:
REFER TO E-29 (20A01136) ICC UPSRAD£ .
- DATA CCl.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.MBER:
TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: YI-42-1 I IDIS INYCk.YEO: LOCATION ~NT NAME SYSTEl!I SUBSYSTEl'I CORE COOL ~ H NJT IN INV FILE
- Hlll9I £N:iINEERIN6 DISCREPIKY REPORT- 82/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2t53 DISPLAYS NEEDED IN TI£ CCWTRtl ROOi!. W!PLT 07/15/85..
ttJMAN ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATION er= DISPLAYED INFO. FmwRE TO DETECT ABtllR IR ClNITI CJ4S. " fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED NEEDED IN CR. 0710 PARAGRAPH rtJJqlER: 6.1.1, l.A SUGGESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE DISPLAYS rEEDED BY !PS.. Ht DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-77 (20A02N5), NOTE: RSWT CAT TAN< NR INDIC NOT PREVIOUSLY LISTED ON PI-77, ADDED FR()! PRESENT 1£D* DATA co...LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUftBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION R£JIIARKS: P.9.2-1. IT91S INV!l.. YED: IIARK IOBER LOCATION COfilPOfENT NAME SYSTEII SUBSYSTEM OC PR IITR ff NOT IN INV FILE t
- BEAR COO. HD ff r,JT IN INV FILE t CORE CCXL 11N ff NOT IN INV FILE t CTIIT H2 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 DIFF PRESS ff f()T IN INV FILE t PRZR PR NR ff NOT IN INV FILE t PRZR SPRA W ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS BQRl)j HNOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE I RVLIS RWST CAT TK ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SEa:wDRY SYS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
tllfllAN 8EINEERIN6 DISCR£PANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 ITEJIIS INVCl.YED: JIIARK NlJIIIBER LOCATION COfl>OfENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM SEQ CF EVENT ff f()T IN INV FILE t SHDN DRN VSL ff NOT IN INV FILE t STII FLO STIP ff l<<JT IN INV FILE t STRlP FD FLO ff MJT IN INV FILE t TURB OIL BEA ff MJT IN INV FILE t
ltA OOINEERHE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSlENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2l54 DISPLAYS r£EDED IN CR TO BRING PUWT TO SAFE SHU~. COll>LT 87/15/85 tUIAN ERROR: flISINTERPRETATION CF DISPLAYED INFORl'IATION, FAILURE TO DHEC T ABt<<llM. CONDITIIJ,IS. *
~ P ~ DESCRIPTICW1
!PS REPORTED THE DISPLAYS LISTED ARE NEEDED IN CR TO BRIMi ~T TO SAFE SltJTl)(liW, 0708 PARAGRAPH NlJIBER:
6.1.1. l, A SISiESTED 9'1CKFIT: PROVIDE DISPUlYS r£EDtD BY CPS.
*** DISPOSITION:
ScE PI -77 (28A02805) *
- DATA. ro.LECTION DESCRIPTICN Ir<<> CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ ~IDATION REl',ARKS: P.9.2-3 ITB1S INVCX.YEO: PIARI< NU~R UDHION COIP()ENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FW FLO NR ff tfJT IN INV FILE t
~ FW RES BY H t(IT IN INV FILE I STND PIPE LV ff f(JT IN INV FILE 1
IIMlH EM;INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT. 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW . TITLE RESPOHSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2856 NO POSITIVE INDICATION THAT INSTRlllENTS ~ FAILED, C(Jl)LT 16/87/85 11.R ERROR: flISINTERPRETATION OF. DISPLAYED INFO. tff PROl!l9I DESCRIPTION: NJT ~vs POS INDIC T~T INSTfUI ~ FAILED/.11£COfE It6'ERATIVE. ALL !HRS DO NJT FAIL OFF SCALE;, 50fE FAIL AS IS 871!0 PARAGRAPH rtJ!L!BER: 6.5.1. l.F SU66ESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE A POSITIVE INDICATION THAT~ INSTRlJENT ~ FAILED OR 11£CO!E I~TIVE. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-NIT EXPECTED TO II£ SAIE, DIFFIOCS KEPT W/IN ACCEPTABLE RN6 BY ADfilIN CTRLS
/PERIODIC 0£[:I( BY INSTRlll TECHS DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M.JIIIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-5. 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: P*. 9*. 2-15-2&5 ITEMS INVCl.VED: NARK rtlf!BER LOCATION IDflOfENT NAIi£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM TI-1-411B ff NOT IN INV FILE* TI-l-412A ff NOT IN INV FILE* TI-l-421B ff NJT IN INV FILE
- TI-i-422A ff t<<JT IN INV FILE*
TI-1-431B ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* TI-1-4328 ff NOT IN INV FILE* TI-2-411B LAC413 IIIETER REACTOR COCl.ANT <PRIMARY UXP, PWR> SYS TI-2-4128 LAA414 METER REACTOR COOJINT (PRIMARY Loo:>, PWRl SYS TI-2-421B r<<413 METER REACTOR coo.ANT (PRiflARY LOOP, PWRl SYS
- TI-2-422A TI-2-431B NAB414 OAC413 METER IIIETER REACTOR REACTOR CID.ANT CCIIUWT
!PRIMARY (PRIMARY Loo:>, PWRl SYS UXP, PWRl SYS
11M BEINEERil'f3 DISCREPKY REPORT 02/28/86
- t£D NO: ~
ITEMS INVCLVED: SURRY UNIT2 MRI< NJIIIBER LOCATION CCJIIIP!MNT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJI TI-2-432B DAA41~ IETER REACTOR coo.ANT !PRH!ARY LOOP, PWRl SYS
- I
~ ENGINEERil'<<3 DISCREPANCY REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22At2857 t<<l POSITIVE INDICATI~ THAT INSTRlMENTS ~ FAILED. C(N)LT 16/17/85 ttJl9I ERROR:
l!ISINTERPRETATI~ OF DISPLAYED INFO. fff PROIILEN DESCRIPTION: r<<lT ~YS POS INDIC THAT INSTRUM HAS FAILED/BECOIE Ir<<JPERATIVE. ~ JIITRS DO NlT FAIL OFF SCR.E; DE FAIL AS IS . 8780 PAAA6RAPH NJIIIB£R: 6.5. l, 1.F SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE A POSITIVE INDICATION THAT AN INSTRIJENT HAS FAILED OR BECOIE IMPERATIVE. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE~ LOSS OF POWER ,ETERS ARE DESI6NED TO FAIL OFF SCALE*
- DATA m.LECTIDN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.MBER:
TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND Vfl.IDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRKS: P.9.2-15-3 IIDIS INYCl.lJED:
~RK rtl!IIER LOCATI~ Cll!POfENT NAIi: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM LOSS CF PWR H MJT IN INV FILE*
. IOIAN ENSINEERINS DISCRE~Y REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY ~IT 2 CODE B ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED t(J TITLE . RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 22A020S8 f<<l POSITIVE INDICATION THAT INSTRlJIENTS HAVE FAILED. ENG II -6 03/17/86 ltMN ERROR:
MISINTERPRETATION CF DISPLAYED INFO. / Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: r<<lT ~WAYS POS INDIC THAT INSTRlJIII HAS FAILED/BECO!E INlPERATIVE. U. NTRS DO t(JT FAIL CFF SCALE, SOIE FAIL AS IS 1780 PARAGRAPH fOIBER: 6.S.1.1.F SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE APOSITIVE INDICATION THAT AN INSTRUPIENT HAS FAILED FOR BECOf!IE INOPERATIVE. fff DISPOSITION: INST~ ~ RIStff VERTICAL BOARD INDICATORS FOR STEAJII GENERATOR WIDE RANGE LEVEL
~ ~NSER wmJll. ALL OTHER HAVE INDICATOR BACKUP OR ARE NOT OF SAFETY SISNF ICANCE. SEE P- 77 C21A02005l.
DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER: TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRKS: P.9.2-15-4 ITEMS INVCl!.VED: LOCATION COf!PONENT NAE SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEl'I LR-2-477 RM41S RECORDER flAIN STEA,! SYSTEM PR-OH81A RM428 RECORDER CDDENSATE SYST91 PR-OH91B H t(JT IN INV FILE f
IUIAN EtEINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED t(J TITLE
~ 9 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACO.JAATE OOBi, SURRY UNIT2 CODE AB RESPllEIBILITY ENG ASSESSfENT STATUS I -3 LAST REVIEW DATE Vtf,/U/85 It.A ERROR:
ERROR IN IP RESPOEE, 1H PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAY LISTED DOES rt:IT PROVIDE THE PRECISI~ OR ~RACY REllJIRED WHEN USING IT, 0700 PARAGRMi l'UIBER: 6.5.1.2.A SU36ESTED MCKFIT: PROVIDE 6REATER PRECISION OR ACO.JRACY FOR DISPLAY. 1H DISPOSITION: R£FER TO Pl-71-5 .!29A02201f PIODIFY INDICATOR *
- DATA ro..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ .IN) CODE OBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ ~IDATION ROORKS: P.9.2-16-2 ITEMS IM.VED: _
~RK NUPIBER LOCATI~ ~ T ~ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FI-SHN PABe55 IETER SAS WASTE RADIOACTIVE SYSIDI
~ OOINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO SURRY TITLE
- 22All2l68 DISPLAYS t()T PRECISE OR ACCURATE OOSi, UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfiENT STATUS.
u -6 LAST REVIEW DATE rU/38/86 lUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CJ> RESPCrEE. fff PROIUM DESCRIPTI~: DISPLAYS LISTED DO ttJT PROVIDE Tl£ PRECISION OR ~RACY REOOIRED WHEN USINS TH9L 07111 PARAGRM-1 NLMER: 6.5.1.2.A S006ESTED ~IT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS, fff DISPCISITI~: REFER TO Vl-73 (29A02236>
- DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION IWD Vll.IDATlON TP-5,1 DISPU\YS SURVEY R91ARKS: P.9.2-16-3 IT91S INVO.IO:
~RK NI.OOlER LOCATION COIP(JENT "llE SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEJII LI-DA-218A ~12 IETER DRAINS (AERATED) SYSTEJII LI-llA-2198 DAB312 IETER DRAINS <AERATED) SYSTEM
HUim ENSINEERIIE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO 22Al2861 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE a<<Jl.Qi.
RE5r00IBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS CO!IR.T LAST REVIEW DATE f!6/U/85 tUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN !JI RESPONSE. fH PROa9I DESCRIPTION: DISP!.AYS LISTED llO t()T PROVIDE Tl£ PRECISI~ OR ACCURACYREIIJIRED WHEN USIN6 THEM. 8708 PARAGRAPH NlJIBER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. A SUGGESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE: GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. fH DISPOSITI~: DELETE-lit£ TO NATURE OF PA~ERS, SOUS l'IIJST BE EXPRESS£D AS LOS, REFERS TO A LL RAD. IOITOR SCALES. DATA COLLECTION D£SCRIPTI0N AND CODE rtJIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATICl4 AND ~IDATION* RE~RKS: P.9.2-16-4 ITEMS INVll.VED: 11\RK NUfllBER LOCATION CCJIIIPOrENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RAD IIJHITORS ff r<<lT IN INV FILE*
ttWlN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UN IT2 CODE C ASSEss.ENT LAST REYIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82862 DISPLAYS r<<lT PRECISE DR OCCURATE ENW3H. III-9 V/6/07/85 tUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN IP RESPONSE. Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED DO t()T PROVIDE Tf£ PRECISICJ,4 OR f:CCU~Y REQUIRED WHEN USirE Ttel. 07j0 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.5.1, 2, A Sl66ESTED OOCKFIT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR OCCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-71-8 128A02213l. r<<l ACTION REQUIRED*
- DATA co..t.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE roBER:
TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
!BARKS:
P.9.2-16-5 I IDIS INVO..VED:
~RK TUBER LOCATION Cl)IP()tENT MIi£ SYSTEJil SUBSYSTEM Fl-CC-leeA H r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 FI-CC-lNB H r<<lT IN Ih\l FILE 1 fI-CC-2MI H t()T IN INV FILE I FI-CC-2188 H NIT IN Ih\l FILE 1
~ OOINEERIH6 DISCREPANCY R£PDRT 02/28/86
- t£D NO .- 'TITLE
' 22Ai2i6J DISPUIYS NOT PRECISE OR ACO.JRATE SURRY ENClQf I.IHT2 CODE RESPCWSIBILITY ASS£5S,ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 16/17/85 liM ERROR:
ERROR IN IJI RESPONSE. 1H PROltiJII DESCRIPTION: DI~YS LISTED .DO N)T PROVIDE Tl£ PRECISION OR ~IMCYREOOIRED WHEN USING THal. 070e PARAGRAPH ~BER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. A SU66ESTED BACKF IT:
PROVIDE 6REATER PRECISION OR ACCURJ:K:Y FOR DISPLAYS fH DISPOSITION: DaETED-RECORDER AND SPDS ~ PROBLEM*
- DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VI\..IDATION REf!IARKS: P.9.2-16-6 ITEJIIS INV!l. VED: IIAIIK Nl>>IBER LOCATION CO!PONENT rM: SYSTEM SUBSYST91 LI-CS-101!A ff f()T IN IrfJ FILE* LI-CS-10eB
- ff NOT IN INV FILE f LI-CS-lE ff NOT IN INV FILE
- LI-CS-leeD ff NOT IN IrfJ FILE 1 LI-CS-20M . PAA.388 l'IETER COO'AHfENT SPRAY SYSTEM LI-CS-2MI PAB388 IETER CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM LI-CS-2N: PAA309 l'IETER CONTAIMENT SPRAY SYSTEM LI-CS-296D PAB389 IETER CONTAJNIENT SPRAY SYSTEM LR-CS-llil'A ff NH IN INV FILE
- LR-CS-1008 ff NOT IN IrfJ FILE t LR-CS-100!: HNOT IN INV FILE*
liJA EM3INEERIN6 DISCREPAr£Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO: 22A82t63 IT91S INYO..YED:
SURRY UNIT2 JIIARK IOIBER LOCATION COfiAJNENT NAPIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LR-CS-109D ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 LR-CS-288A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 LR-CS-2NB ff NOT IN INV FILE I / LR-CS-2NC ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 LR-CS-2'1D ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
lt.JIIIAH BEINEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE. RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82964 DISPI.AVS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE a<<lJSH. ENS I -2 to/17/85 11M ERROR: ERROR IN c.> RESPONSE. fff PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED DO NOT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR ACCURACYREOOIRED ~ USING TH91. 8718 PARAGRAPH NOOIER: 6.5.1.2.A SOOGESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS.
*** DISP0SITI!l4:
REFER TO PI-71-12 (20Ai2215)
- DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIBER:
TP-9, 2 . VERIFICATION AND VR.IDATION R91ARKS: P.9.2-16-7 ITEJIIS INY!l.lJED: - l'AIIK MJIIIBER LOCATION CQIIIJlOfENT NM: SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEJII LI-Hl2 GAB326 EER D£111IrA. AND Vll.UE CONTRll. SYSTEfll LI-103 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t LI-116 ff NOT IN INY FILE t LI-161 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t LI-163 QAA326 l'ETER 0£111IrA. Ar4l Vll.UIE CONTRll. SYSTE/11 LI-165 QAC326 METER CtDICll. AND VCLUIE m.TRCl. SYSTEJII
~ OOINEERING DISCIEPAf<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED t<<J TITLE SURRY 22Al2l65 DISPLAYS t<<JT PRECISION OR ACCURATE Et<<llSi, UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY
~T STATUS I -5 LAST REVIEW
. DATE 16/07/85 ttM ERROR:
ERROR IN (J) RESPONSE, 1H PROlliJII DEOCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED DO NlT PROVIDE Tt£ PRECISI~ OR !m.l~YREIIJIRED lf!£N USING THEM. 07118 PARAGRAPH NIJll!BER: 6.S.1.2.A SOOSESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE SREATER PRECISI~ OR ACO.JIW:Y FOR DISPLAYS. 1H DISPOSITION:
.REFER TO PI-111-2 !~)
- DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND Vll.IDATION
~RKS:
P.9.2-16-8 ITENS INVll.VED: IIARK rumER LOCATION COfilPONENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FI-1-474 ff t41T IN INV FILE t FI-i-475 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t FI-1-484 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t Fl-1-485 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t FI-1-494 ff NlT IN INV FILE t Fl-1-495 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t FI-2-474 LAAAl 7 l£TER IIAIN STEAfl SYSTEM FI-2-475 LAB417 IETER IIIAIN STEAM SYSTEM FI-2-484 NAA417 IIETER IIAIN STEAfl SYSTEM FI-2-485 NAB417 IIETER IIIAIN STEAM SYSTEM FI-2-494 OAA417 IIIETER .IIAIN STEA,! SYSTEM
fl.A ENlINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED r<<J: 22Ae2865 ITEPIS INVCl.VED:
SURRY UNIT2 SUBSYSTEM MAK NUIIBER LOCATION CIWIOHENT NAME SYSTEM FI.:Z-495 lm417 IIETER MIN STEA,! SYSTEJII
DISCR£PA1t::Y REPORT 02/28/86 HIJ!AN EN61NERHE SURRY ~IT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t(I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai2t66 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE OOBI. COMPLT 16/97/85 It.A ERROR: ERROR IN OP RESPONSE. Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED DO t(IT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR A:CURACYREllJIRED lf£N USING TH9I. 9798 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER:
- 6. 5, 1, 2. A SU36ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-AAINTENIKE TO CORRECT*
- DATA CCl.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl.J!IIBER:
TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION P.9.2-16-9&12 IIDIS INYO-VED: 11Af1K.NUIIIE£R LOCATION COfl)()f£NT NAflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FCV-2478 EAA21~ PROCESS CONTROLLER FEEDWATER SYSTEM STEAM GENERATORS FCV-2488 EAB212 PROCESS ~TRa..LER FEEDWATER SYSTEJII STEAM GENERATORS FCV-2498 EAA213 PROCESS CONTRO..LER FEEDWATER SYSTEM STEA,! GENERATORS MI-UHN H t(IT IN lfN FILE 1 MI-ut-211 RAB312 METER LEAKAGE IOITORING SYSTEM
HUIIIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESS:'IENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A92167 DISPLAYS r<<JT PRECISE OR ACCURATE EtOJ6H ENG III-7 06/07/85 tLWlN ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE tff PROIUM DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED DO MJT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR AOO.JRACYREllJIRED WHEN USING TH91. 0700 PARAGRAPH ~BER: 6.5.1.2.A SI.EGESTED BACl{F!T: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-71-2 (20A0221ll
- DATA CD..LECTION DESCRIPTI()I AND COD£ NUP!BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REl'IARl<S I P. 9. 2"".16-10 IIDIS INYCLVED: MIi< fUIBER LOCATION COMPONENT NAIE SYSTEN SUBSYSTEM Fl-0-932 ff r()T IN INV FILE f
.FI-0'.'"933 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 fl-0-969 ff MJT IN INV FILE f FI-0-961 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FI-0-962 ff MJT IN INV FILE t FI-0-963 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE 22Ae2t68 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE Er<<lBi SURRY UNIT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSrENT STATUS COMPLT LAST REVIEW DATE NONE 06/07/SS tUAI ERROR:
ERROR IN l:PRATOR RESPONSE. fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: DISPtAYS LISTED DO t()T PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR ACCURACYREGUIRED lfi£N USIN6 TH91.. 0700 PARAGRAPH NI.Jll!BER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. A S006ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE 6REATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS fff DISPOSITION: DEL£TE-PARAPIETERS ARE ON SPDS*
- . DATA C(llECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NLlf!BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: P. 9. 2-16-11 ITalS ItM:l.VED: NARK t<<.Jfe:R LOCATI~ CQlll)(JNENT ~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJ!I LI-0-922 ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-0-924 ff NOT IN INV FILE t / LI-0-926 ff NOT IN INV FILE t Ll-0-928 ff l'()T IN INV FILE t LI-0-938 ff NOT IN INV FILE t
HilllAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESS,ENT LAST REVIEW HED t(J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A92869 DlSPUIYS NOT PRECISE OR ~RATE ErOJ6H NONE COfl1PI..T 06/97/85 IUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE. fff PAOa.91 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAY LISTED DOES NOT PROVIDE THE PRECISI~ DR ~CURACY REGUIRED WHEN USING no. 971N PARAGRAPH NIJIBER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. A SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION DR ACCURACY FDR DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-IF 2 PUIIIPS RUi.!Itfi FL()I WOULD BE a,*. NO~ FLOW I.E. 4,B IS NEAR I'll
- DDLE IF SOU.
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RE!flRKS:. P.9.2-16-13 ITENS INYCl.~: - NARK IUIBER LOCATION COPPOt£NT NAME SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEl'I FI-0-65 H r<<lT IN INV FILE t
, ,. HUIIIAN EtEINEERI~ DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSll!ENT
- LAST REVIEW HED r<<J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ae217i DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE B0..8i ENS I -2 0(;,/07/85 IUIAN ERROR:
ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPONSE. fff PROFUM DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED DO r<<JT PROVIDE it£ PRECISION OR ACCURACYREllJIR£D WHEN USING THEPI. UN PARAGRAPH Nll'1BER:
- 6. 5.1.2, A SOOGESTED BACl<F IT: .
PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITI~: REFER TO PI-71-4 (20A022l@l
- DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTICl4 AND CODE NUfl!BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS: P.9.2-16-16 ITEIIS Ih'W..VED: IIARK tOIIER LOCATION COll>ONENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LI-CS-181 H .r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 LI-CS-291 NAA388 METER ~TAIM'ENT SPRAY SYSTB!
HUIIIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSP1£NT LAST REVIEW HED t() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STAiUS DATE 22A82871 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE BO.J6H COfllPLT 06/07/85 HlJIIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE. fff PROBI.BI DESCRIPTION: DISP\..AYS LISTED DO ~T PROVIDE TH£ PRECISION OR ACCURACY REllJIR£D WHEN USING THEM. uee PARAGRAPH NUJIIBER: 6.5.1.2.A SIJ36ESTED BACl<F IT: PROVIDE SREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITI~: DELETE~RROW RAMx HISf-! AND Lrni EXIST *
- DATA COLLECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUPIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS: P.9.2-16-17 ITEMS IfMl.VED: IIA~ NJIIIBER LOCATION co,ip()NENT NAME SYSTE."I SUBSYSTE/11 PI-2-402 NAA41'J 1£TER REACTOR COClANT !PRil'!ARY LOOP, PWR) SYS PI-2-482-1 PM319 IETER REACTOR COll.ANT !PRI~RY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER
lllllAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE 22Al2e72 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE OO&i SURRY UNIT2 CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ENG ASSESSl'!ENT STATUS II -S LAST REVIEW DATE lf,/07/85 ltJIAI ERROR:
ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE. fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:
*DISPtAYS LISTED DO MJT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR OCCURACY REil.JI RED WHEN USirE THEPI.
UN PARAGRAPH NIJIIIBER:
- 6. 5, 1, 2, A 5Ui6ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE BREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS,
- fff DISPOSITION:
REFER TO PI-71-7 120A02209),
- DATA CCllECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NLJIIIBER:
TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: P,9,2-16-18 ITEJIIS INVCl.VED: MRI< NJIIIBER LOCATION COIIPOf£NT NAPE. SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll PI-2-~ PAA318 PIETER REACTOR COCl.ANT IPRil'IARY LOOP, PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER PI-2-445 PAB318 METER REACTOR CIXIUINT <PRI!IIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER P.I-2-455 OM318 METER REACTOR COCl.ANT <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER PI-2-456 cm318 IETER REACTOR C(XIMT <PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER PI-2-457 IRU19 PIETER REACTOR COCl.ANT IPRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER
/
tlWlN £N6INEERIN6 DISCREPA.~Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE A ASSESSfl!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
- 22A92874 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE ENOU6H 00 II -5 ~/U/85
~ERROR:.
ERROR IN IJ> RESPONSE, 1H PROa.EJII DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED DO NOT PROVIDE THE PRECISI~ OR ~RACYREOOIRED IIHEN USING THO!. 07N PARAGRAPH NUMBER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. A SlJi6ESTED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION FOR DISPLAYS* 1H DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-71-16 129A02219l
- DATA CCl.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUJl!BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REAARKS: P.9.2-16-20 ITEMS lNV(LVED: MRK rtJIIIBER LOCATION C()llll()t£NT NAflE SYSTEJ!I SUBSYSTE/11 FI-VS-118 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
HLWlN OOINEERING DISC~CY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE 22Ai2873 DISP1..AY6S NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE OOBi SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESS!'!ENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 06/~7/85 tt.- ERROR:
ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.
/
fff PROaEM DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED DO t(JT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR ACCU~YREOOIRED WHEN USING THEPI. 97N PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1.2.A 51.SiESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE 6REATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-23 ( ~ l ,
- DATA C0-1..ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl!P.BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~RKS:
P.9.2-16-19 IIDIS ItMl.lJEDs IIAIIK ttJflll£R LOCATION COflPONENT.l'fl!E SYSTE!II SUBSYSTEM FI-YS-116 MM01!17 IIETER VENTILATION SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-YS-2873 H t(JT IN INV FILE t /
HUll!AN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED t() TITLE SURRY OOIT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSP£NT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A82876 DISPLAYS THAT REQUIRE SOfE FD"' CF CO'M:RSION, COMPLT V/6/07/85 KM ERROR:
ERROR IN INTERPRETIN6. DEL.AV/ERROR IN RESPONSE, ffto PROlUJII DESCRIPTION: DISPLAY LISTED REQUIRES SOI£ F08" CF CONVERSION IN ORDERTO EFFECTIVELY USE INFORl'IATION. 07N PARASRUlti OBER:
- 6. 5.1, 2. B SU66ESTED. BACl(FIT:
OfN£ SCIUS OR PROVIDE SECOO!ARV INDICATING FOR DISPlAVS REQUIRlrf:i CONVERSIONS.
'** DISPOSITION:
DELETE-NOT THIE CRITI~. NOT SAFETY* RELATED, NOT A PROBl..91*
- DATA CO-LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJlflRKS: P.9.2-18-6 ITEJIIS INY(LVED: l'IARK NJIIIER LOCATION CCJllllOt£NT NAIIE SVSTEJII SUBSVST91 SWTCHVD DISP H r<<lT IN INV FILE *
- 1 HU~ ENSINEERHE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSMfNT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS . DATE 22A82975 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACOJRATE ErO.&i. CQIIIPLT 06/07/85 l'UIAN ERROR:
ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED DO NJT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR ACCURACYREQUIR£D lfiEN USING TH91. 0709 PARA6Rl¥lH Nllti!ER: 6.5.1.2.A SU36ESTED BOCl<FIT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO P.9.2-15-4 (22A02858) *
- DATA CCUECTIOO DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NI.JfllBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION REMRKS: P.9.2-16-21 IIDIS INYCLIJED: MRK NUPIBER LOCATION CQIIIPOtENT tM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEfll PR-cN-201A RM420 RECORDER CONDENSATE SYSTEM PR-CN-2918 ff NOT IN INV FILE t
HUIIIAN ENSINE£RirE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 COD£ ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~ 7 7 DISPLAYS ~T REQUIRE SOME FORfl Cf CllNERSI~ COl4PLT 06/17/85
!(R ERROR:
ERROR IN INTERPRETirE. DELAY /ERROR IN CJl RESP0'4SE. fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED REQUIRE SOI£ FOAA Cf CONV£RSI0N IN ORDERTO EFFECTIVELY USE INFDRMTION. 07N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.5.1,2.B SUi6ESTED BAC:KJ=IT:
*DA\13E SCIUS OR PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS FOR DISPLAYS REDUIRI~ CONVERSIONS.
DISPOSITION: AIR FLIM RATE-sEE P.9.2-16-2 !22A02059l, CC HDR FLOW-SEEP.9.2-16-5 (22A02062J, C ST LEVEL-SEE PHH! !2M2007>
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.JIEER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATION REJIIARKS: P.9.2-18-7/8/12 ITE..S IfMLYED:
. MRK ~R LOCATION COIIPOt£NT ~ SYSTErlf suesYsm, AIR FLO RATE ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t CC HDR FLIM ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t CST LEVEL ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t
HU~ ErtiINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE 2.2Ae2878 DISPLAYS OOT IOJLD BE USEFUL IN SOE SURRY ~IT2 CODE B on£R Vil.LE.
RESPONSIBILITY ENS ASSESSIENT STATUS Ill-7 LAST REVIEW DATE Vi:,/07/85 It.NIN ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATI~ OF DISPUlYED INFO, 11ISR£ADitE If' DISPLAYS. Hf P ~ DESCRIPTION: DISPLAY LISTED lllLU) .BE PORE USEFUL IN INDir.ATED IN S0f1EOTl£R VALL.£. 17'11i PARASRAPH Nll!BER:
- 6. 5. 1. 2. D. 1 SIJ36ESTED BACKFIT:
D4W3E SCUS TO PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-72-2 ( ~ ) *
- DATA co..LECTI~ nESCRIPTIOO AND CODE ruir£R:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPI..AYS SURVEY R£11ARKS: P.9.2-19-2 ITEMS INYCl.'ve: MAK NJIIIBER LOCATION C011POt£NT ~ SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEM CDSR BACK PR ff NlT IN INV FILE t
Ht.A EN:iINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A82879 DISPLAYS ~T WllJI..D BE USEFLl IN SOlilE OTHER ~UE. NOD II -7 86/17/85 KM ERROR1 IUSINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED INFO; IUSREADING IF DISPLAYS.
Hf PROa.EN DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LISTED l<<lULD BE .ORE USEFUL IF INDICATED IN SOI£ OTl£R VALLE. e1ee PARAGIW>H rtJ111I£R:
- 6. 5. 1. 2. D, 1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
OflfEE SCIU TO PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-110 (28002007) ET. ll. *
- DATA CXLLECTill4 DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE*IRKS1 P.9.2-19-3/4/5/6/7/8/9/18/12/13/14/15 ITEMS ItMl.VED: IIARK !OBER LOCATION CQlllONENT ~ SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEM BAST LYL ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f CAT LVL ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t CST LEVEL
- ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f BIER CST LYL H r<<lT IN INY FILE t PDTT LYL ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t PRI DRNS XFR ff t<<JT IN INY FILE t PRZR REL TK ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f PRZR SPRAY ff r(lT IN !NY FILE t RCS FLOW H t<<JT IN !NY FILE t
- RECIRC SPRAY SI ACClJI LVL H
ff r(lT l'()T IN IN INV FILE* INV FILE t
HilllAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPA1£Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 ITOO INIJCl.YED:
~RK NJIIISER LOCATION CCJflPOtENT NAIIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM VCT ff r<<lT IN INV FIi.£ *
/
I
HU~ EN6INEERIN3 DISCREPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UN IT2 CODE B ASSESSPIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY
- STATUS DATE 22A82l88 DISPS t<<lT ADEOOATE IN RANGE, t(IT SlPPORTED BY ll!X INSTRUfENTATl(),I, NOD II -7 to/87/85 lt.R ERROR:
1'1SINTERPRETATl()il OF DISPLAYED INFO, PIISREADINS Cf" DISPLAY,
- Hf PROBL.al DESCRIPTil)'t:
DISPLAYS t<<lT ADEQUATE IN TERIIIS OF RAt&: OR ARE t<<lT SUPPORTED BY ~XILIARY INSTIMIENTATION, 0700 PARAGRAPH l'O!BER:
- 6. 5. 1, 2. D. 3 SI.ESESTED BAO<FIT:
PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCIUS/ INSTRUIENTATION, Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-lli ( ~ 7 ) ET. ~* DATA cru.ECTIIJ4 DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARl<S: P,9,2-2&-2/3/4/5/8 ITENS INVCl.VED: -
~RK MJ"8£R LOCATION COPIPONENT rM SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEM fW FLm. ff t<<lT IN INY FILE t PDT PR B RCV ff NOT IN INV FILE t PDT PR BRT ff t(IT IN INY FILE t RWST LYI. ff t<<lT IN INV FILE I SI ACClJI ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t STIii FLm. H r<<lT IN INV FILE 1
ltJIIIAN,ENSINEERING DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UN IT2 CODE ASSESSll!ENT LAST REVIEW
. TITLE _ RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai2881 DISPS NlT ADEQUATE IN RANGE, NlT SlJIPORTED BY AUX INSTRUENTATI~ EN6 I -9 01/Ja/86 KM ERROR:
IIISINTERPRETATION IF DISPlAYED INFO. ,11SREADIN6 CF DISPLAY. fH PROllBI DESCRIPTION:
- DISPLAYS NlT ADEIDlTE IN TERfllS IF RANGE OR ARE NlT SUPPORTED BY AUXILIARY INSTRIJIENTATION, 07N PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER:
- 6. 5. 1, 2. D, 3 S006ESTED BACl<FIT:
PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCALES/INSTRU,ENTATION. fH DISPOSITION: ICC INSTIMIENTATION IS BEIN6 UPSRADED. REFER TO E-29 (20A01136l *
- DATA CCl.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5. l DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRKS: P.9.2-28-7 ITEMS INVO.W>: IIARK tUIIIER LOCATI~ COIIIPONENT rM: SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEJ!I IP<<:ORE T/C H NJT IN INV FILE 1 I
HlMN Et.SINEERir.6 DISCREPAHCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED r<<l TITLE SURRY LtHT2 CODE 8 RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSNENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22Al2882 DISPS r<<lT ADEQUATE IN RANGE, r<<lT SUPPORTED BY AUX INSTRUENTATIC*. I -2 ~/17/85 tlJAI ER_ROR:
IIISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED INFO, 1i1ISREADIN6 ~ DISPLAY. Hf PROIILBI DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS l(JT ADEQUATE IN TE8'1S OF RANGE OR AR£ l(JT SUPPORTED BY AUXILIARY INSTRUl£NTATION. uee PARAGRAPH NIJIIIBER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. D. 3 SUGGESTED BACl(FIT:
PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCALES/INSTRUJIENTATION. Hf DISPOSITION:
. REFER TO PI-76-2 (20A02414l
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RalARl<S: P.9.2-2H ITEMS INYll.'-9: IIARK rt.lllBER LOCATION COl'llOr£NT ~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM NR S6 LVL ff "'1T IN INV FILE*
HUfllAN EN6IN£ERIN3 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UN IT2 CODE B ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED MJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A92883 DISPLAYS ON. VBS TOO HI8H TO BE VIEWED FRCII.MJM. VIEWINS AREA NOD I -2 08/07/85 tl.JA ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS. H+ PROEl91 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS ABOVE 78" CA,NJT BE VIEWED BY 5TH PERCENTILE FEIR.£ FRCJII NON. VIEWING AREA. (FR 00 CF BBi 07N PARAGRAPH t<<JIIIBER: 6.1.2.2 6.1.2.5.B SUGGESTED BACKF IT: DETERfllirE DISPLAYS THAT ~FECT PLANT SAFETY &RELOCATE TO LOWER LOCATION ON VB TO ENSURE E
. ASE CF VIEWING. *** DISPOSITION:
PROVIDE ASTEP STCXL r<<JTE:. NR ~ BEEN REaJIIIIENDED PER PI-71-4 (20A02210l *
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTICN AND CODE NlJIIIBER:
TP-1.2 ~HROPOIETRICS SURVEY
~~S:
- 1. 2-4-1. SEE WRITIEN HED FOR IT01S WITHWT MRI< rtJIIIBERS.
IIDIS Ih'YCLVED1
!ARI< rtJMBER LOCATION COPllQl,ENT rM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LI-CS-281 NAA388 METER CONTAINMENT SPRA~ SYSTEIII
HUMAN ENSIN£ERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai2t84 DISPUlYS ~ VBS TOO HIGH TO BE VIEWED FRIJI NON. VIEWitE AREA. NOD II -£ 18/U/85 It.A ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS. fff PROILBI DESCRIPTI~: DISPlAYS ABOV£ 70" CArNIT BE VIEWED BY 5TH PERC£NTILE F8!1U FR()! NORMAL VIEWitE AREA. !FR ONT CF BB. l 87ie PARAGRAPH tUBER: 6.1.2.2 6.1.2.5.B SU66£STED BACKFIT: DETERMirE DISPLAYS THAT AFFECT PLANT SAFETY AND R£LOCATETO LOWER LOCATION ON VB TO ENSURE EASE CF VIEWING. 1*4 DISPOSITION: PROVIDE A STEP STOOL FOR ITEJIIS LISTED*
- DATA C(llECTI~ DESCRIPTIC14 AND CODE NU!BER:
TP-1.2 ANTHRCJPOIIETRICS SURVEY R91Aft<S: 1.2-4-2. SEE WRITIEN f£D FOR ADDITION!l. ITEPIS W/OUT ~RI< r()S IIDIS INVCl~:
~Ill< NJIBER LOCATION CQlll)()fNT NA,£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 2-CC-P-lC LAA425 IETER COf!P()£NT CCll.ItE SYSTEIJI 2-CC-P-tD l.AB425 IETER CM'ONENT COO..ItE SYSTEJI 2-CO-P-lB ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 2-FC-P-lA LM315 LIGHT Fl.EL PIT COO..ItE SYSTEM 2-FC-P-lB LM316 LI6HT FUEL PIT ccn.ItE SYSTEIJI 2A2-341 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 BYP STATUS LTS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 CC OOTLET FLCII . ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 CDDSR B TUBE ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
- CDSR BTUBE a..NR IUECTOR A H t()T ff t<<JT IN IN INV INV FILE FILE 1
f
HUMAN ENSINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 IE>Ml: ~ ITEMS INYCLVED:
.w:IRK IOlER LOCATION CCJIIIPONENT NAfE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTE/JI DETECTOR C ff NOT IN INV FILE t DETECTOR E ff NOT IN INV FILE t I
DETECTOR POSTN ff NJT IN INV FILE t FI-2-138A NAA317 PIETER REACTOR COOLANT !PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR) SYS REACTOR COil.ANT PlJIIPS FI-2-414 LAC411 METER REACTOR coo.ANT CPRIPIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD Fl-2-415 LAA412 PIETER REACTOR COllANT CPRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-2-416 ~12 1£TER. REACTOR COCl.ANT CPRI.w:IRY.L(X)P1 PWRl SYS SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-2-424 NAC411 IIIETER l'IAIN STEAM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJ!I FIRST RECORD FI-2-425 NAA412 PIETER REACTOR C!XlLANT !PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD Fl-2-426 ~12 l'IETER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-2-474 I.AA417 IETER MAIN Slmll SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD fl-2-475 ~17 IIETER .w:IIN STEAPI SYSTEl!I SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-2-476 ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-2-4n ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-2-484 NM417 l!ETER NUN STEAM SYSTEM Fl-2-485 NAB417 l'IETER l'IAIN STEAfl SYSTE/11 FI-2-486 ff NOT IN INV FILE t
- FI-2-487 FI-2-932 FI-2-933 FI-2-948 FI-2-968 FI-BD-283A ff NOT IN INV FIL£ t NAA387 IIIETER NAA386 METER NAB3e7 METER NAB386 IETER I.AA411 1£TER SAFETY INJECTIOH SYSIDI
~ETY INJECTION SYSTEM .
SAFETY INJECTIOH SYSTEIII SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM BLOWDCMN (STEAIII 6ENERATOR/80ILER> SYSTE!II CHARSINl CHARSitE CHARGHE CHARSINi SUBSYST91 FIRST RECORD FI-BD-213B NM411 PiETER BLOWDOWN !STEAfl 6ENERATOR/B0ILERl SYSTEl'l SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-BD-2MA LAB411 METER BLOWOOiW CSTEAIII SENERATOR/BOILER> SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-BD-2:MB NAB41l PIETER BL!IIDIJIN (STEAfl GEr£RATOR/B0IL.ERl SYSTEJJI SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-CC-2MA NAA315 METER CM'IJNENT COO.IN; SYSTEM REACTOR COCJUffl PUNPS FI-CC-285A NAB315 IETER COMPONENT COOI.Irfi SYSTEJII . REACTOR COOLANT PtllPS FI-CC-286A l'flC315 IETER WIPOtENT COOLING SYSTEJII -REACTOR COOLANT ~ FI-CC-297A NAA316 PIETER COflPCt£NT COO..ItE SYSTE/11 REACTOR COOLANT PUfllPS FI-CC-218
- LAB314 PIETER ~ COO.ING SYSTEM REACTOR CID.ANT PlJIPS FI-CC-211A NAA314 IETER CIJIPOENT COO.IN3 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-CC-214 NAA423 METER COIIIP!l£NT COO.ING SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-CC-216 NAA425 PIETER CDl9ENT COO.ING SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-CC-217 NAB425 IIETER COIPOtENT COO.ING SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-YS-116 111M017 IETER VENTILATIOH SYSIDI f SUBSYST91 FIRST RECORD FI-YS-117A ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t FI-YS-1178 ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-YS-119 ~ METER VENTILATION SYSTEJI 1£AT XDIE TOTL H NJT IN INV FILE t Itm Svr<<:H VLT ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t LI-2-471 L.AB328 fllETER REACTOR COClANT (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PwRl SYS PRESSURIZER LI-2-474 I.AA416 IIIETER IIIAIN Slmll SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD Ll-2-475 LAB416 l!ETER IIIAIN STEAfl SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD LI-2..:476 LAC476 PIETER IIIAIN STEAi'! SYSTEM SUBSYSTE/11 FIRST RECORD LI-2-484 NAAA16 IETER fl!AIN STEAi! SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD Ll-2-485 NAB416 METER IIIAIN Slmll SYST01 SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD
l<<M ENSltEERINS DISCREAAt<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 l£D NO: 22Al2l84 ITEMS INYCLVED: IIAIII( NJIIIBER .LOCATION CIJIIIJONENT PAE .SYSTEM. SUBSYSTEM U-2-486 t<<416 METER IIIAIN STEA,! SYSTEJII SUBSYST01 FIRST RECORD LI-2-928 NAA381 METER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM ACCIJU.ATORS U-2-922 ~1 METER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM ACWI.UITORS LI-2-924 NAC311 IETER SAFETY INJECTION SYSIDI ACCUIUATORS LI-2-926 ~ IIIETER ~ETY INJECTION SYSIDI ACCUltJLATORS LI-2-928 NAB382 IE'TER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM ACCUIU.ATORS LI-2-938 r<<392* METER ~ y INJECTION SYSIDI OCCUfll.LATORS LI-CC-288 LA8423 IE'TER COfllP!lENT COO.INS SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD U-CS-285 ff r<<JT IN IN\J FILE f l:I-NS-281 NAB498 l'IETER NEUTRCW SHIELD TANK AND COOLING SYSTEIII LI-RS-251A NAA3t9 METER CONTAINfllENT RECIRCUUITINS SPRAY SYSIDI LI-RS-2518 ff NOT IN INV FILE* f()D-VS-58A NMee4 LIGHT VENTILATION SYSTEJII l(JD-VS-588 NAAN8 LIGHT VENTILATION SYSTEM PCY-2455C TAA317 W(TR(l_ REACTOR coo..ANT <PRIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS RELIEF VALVES PCV-2456 TAA316 CONTROL REACTOR C{X)LANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS .RELIEF VALVES PERM STATUS LTS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 PI-2-156A NAB317 IIIETER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS REACTOR CTi!LANT PUMPS PH'.-482 r.M418 METER REACTOR coo.ANT <PRIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEf!I FIRST RECORD PI-2-483 NAB411 PIETER REACTOR CO!l.ANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD PI-2-446 ff t<<lT IN INV FILE* PI-2-447 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 PI-2-4::r4A ff NOT IN INV FILE* PI-2-466 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE* PI-2-468 ff t<<lT. IN INV FILE
- PI-2-*H2 LM328 fETER REACTOR COOLANT <PRIMARY LW>, PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER PI-2***H4 I.M415 METER MAIN STEAfl SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEl'I FIRST RECORD PI-2-475 LAB415 IE'TER JIIAIN STEAfll SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD PI-2-476 LAC415 IE'TER MAIN STEAi'! SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD PI-2-484 NAA415 METER MAIN STEAfll SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD PI-2-485 NAB415 IETER IIIAIN STEAM SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD PI-2-486 -,<<415 IETER IIIAIN STEAfll SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD PI-2-934 NAA385 IETER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-CV-211A LAA311 METER CONTAINMENT VACl1JI SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-cv-211A2 ~11 IETER CONTAUIENT VACWI SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-tV-2118 LAA312 IETER DJITAINENT VAClUI SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-CV-21182 ~12 METER CCMAil'tENT VACI.Al! SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-IA-211 LAA314 fETER IM;TRlJIENT AIR SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI.:..IA-211 LAA313 IE'TER INSTRUMENT AIR SYSIDI PRESSURIZER PI-ut-211A LAA311 IETER LEAt<A6E IONITORINS SYSIDI PRESSURIZER PI-lJl-2818 LAB318 METER ~ IOHTORING SYSIDI PRESSURIZER PI-sA-201 LAB313 IETER SERVICE AIR SYSTEPI
- PRESSURIZER ff r<<JT IN INV FILE*
RI-RIIIS-151 RI-Rf'S-152 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 RI-RNS-153 . ff NOT IN INV FILE* RI-RNS-154 ff NJT IN HN FILE 1 RI-RIIIS-155 ff NOT IN INV FILE*
ltJMAN ENSINEERil'E DISCREPAPCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 . t£ll Nh 22A82l84 ITEJIIS INYCI..VED: IIAIIK tol!ER LOCATIQIII COfRJENT NAflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII RHIN!H56 ff NOT IN INV FILE
- RI -f!IIIS-261 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RI-RNS-262 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RI-RIIIS-263 ff NOT IN INV FIL£ t RI-91-114 ff NOT IN INV FILE
- RI-SW-115 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RI~14 ff NOT IN INV FILE
- Rl-91-215 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RUN SYr<<:H YOLTS ff NOT IN INV FILE t S0Y-2551A ff NOT IN INV FILE t SJY-2551B H t<<JT IN INV FILE t
- S0Y-2551C HNOT IN INV FILE t SPARE H NOT IN INV FILE
- SOCH LIGITS HNOT IN INV FILE t SYr<<:HROSW>E H t<<JT IN INV FILE
- TI-2-133 LM317 '1ETER REACTOR COOUINT (PRIMRY LOOP, PWR> SYS REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS TI-2-481 NAA488 IETER REACTOR COOLANT !PRIMARY LOOP, PWR) SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD
- TI-2-.\11A TI-2-411B TI-2-412A Tl-2-4128 TI-2-.\12C TI-2-412D I.AA413 IETER L.AC413 l'ETER l.AB414 METER
- L.AA414 IIIIETER L.AC414 .iETER LAB413 IETER REACTOR CO!LANT REACTOR COOLANT REACTOR COO-ANT REACTOR COOLANT REACTOR ccn.ANT REACTOR coo.ANT IPRIMRY LOOP, (PRIMARY LOOP, (PRIMARY L(J(J),
(PRIMARY LOOP, (PRIMARY LIXP, (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> PWR> PWRl PWRl PWR) PWRl SYS SYS SYS SYS SYS SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST SUBSYSTEJII FIRST SUBSYSTEJII FIRST SUBSYSTEM FIRST SUBSYSTEJII FIRST SUBSYSIDI FIRST RECORD RECORD RECORD RECORD RECORD RECORD TI-2-421A ~13 fllETER REACTOR COil.ANT (PRIMARY LOCP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD Tl-2,.~18 1'<<413 IETER REACTOR CCXlA'ff <PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-2-422A NA8414 JIIETER REACTOR COQJlNT (PRIMARY L(l(I), PWR> SYS SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORQ TI-2-4228 NAA414 IETER REACTOR CCXl.JlNT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-422C r<<414 l'ETER REACTOR ~ T (PRIMARY L.(1(1), PWRl SYS SUBSYSTE/11 FIRST RECORD TI-2-4220 NA8413 IETER REACTOR CCXlJrff (PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD ll-2-471 Ul:328 IIIETER REACTOR C!XlJINT (PRIIIIARY LIXP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER TI-CC-283 HNOT IN INV FILE t TI-CC-285A r<<316 IIIETER COMPIJENT COOi.INS SYSTEM REACTOR CCXlJlNT PIJl>S TI-CC-287A tW3316 METER COPJfENT COOUNS SYSTEM REACTOR COOLANT Pl.MPS TI-CC-219A NAB313 f!ETER CQlll)(JENT CCXUNS SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-CC-214 NAA424 METER (Dl)(l£NT COOLING SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-CC-222 LAA424 METER CQIIIP()£NT CCXLIN6 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-CS-283 Nm388 IETER C04TAiffENT SPRAY SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-fC-213 LA8315 METER FLE. PIT CCXLINS SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-NS-211 NAA4l9 IETER NEUTRQIII SHIB.D TAN< AND COOLING SYSTEM SUBSYSIDI FIRST RECORD TI-RS-251A NAA311 IIIETER IDTAINIIIENT RECIRCl.l.ATIN6 SPRAY SYSTEJll SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TREND RECORDERS ff NOT IN INV FILE t TRIP STATUS LTS HNOT IN INV FILE t U2 LOAD lllW RCRD ff NOT IN INV FILE t VITAL BUS BUS 1 H t<<JT IN INV FILE
- VITAL BUS BUS 2 ff NOT IN INV FILE t VITAL BUS llJS 3 H NOT IN INV FILE
- VITAL llJS BUS 4 ff NOT IN INV FILE t
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPIKY REPORT 02./28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22Al2885 DISPLAYS~ VBS TOOL~ TO BE VIEWED F~ rt1M. VIEWIN6 AREA.
RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIEHT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 08/07/85 IUIAN ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS. fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LrnER THAN 41" CArHJT BE VIEWED BY 5TH PERCENTILE FEflR.E FROM r<<lRl!IAI.. VIEWING AREA
* (FRONT OF BB. l t7* PAAA6RAPH MJIIIBER:
6.1.2,2 6.1.2.5.B SUGGESTED BACKF IT: DETEAll!ItE DISPLAYS THAT ~FECT ~T SAFETY &RELOCATE TO HIGHER LOCATION ON VB TO ENSURE EASE OF VIEW Ir<<3. 1*1 DISPOSITION: DISPS LrnER T141N 41" ARE SilllLE INDIC LTS/t<<JN-CRITICAL ll!TRS/RCDRS/INTEGRATORS. D 0 NOT AFFECT SIHTY. NO ACTI!lt DATA cou.ECTION DESCRIPTION iwD CODE NUIIBER: TP-1,2 ~THROPOETRICS SURVEY REIIIRKS:
- 1. 2-4-3. SEE WRITIEN HED FOR ITOO WITHOUT !IIARK USERS.
ITENS INW..VED: MRK rotBER LOCATION CO!f)OfENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 82fi~118 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t 2-116-P-lA TAA325 DISCRETE ROTARY DRAINS HVDROOENATED SYSTEM 2-116-P-lB TAB325 DISCRETE ROTARY DRAINS HYDROOENATED SYSTEM CN DRN PPS f f r<<JT IN INV FILE t CA-SS-281 ff NJT IN INV FILE t CS-SS-281 ff NOT IN INV FILE t DETECTOR B f f r<<JT IN INV FILE t DETECTOR D ff NOT IN INV FILE t DETECTOR E ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t EX""-'STER A ff NOT IN INV FILE t EXIRISTER B H r<<JT IN INV FILE t
HlJ*lN EN6INEERHE DISCREPANCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 l£D r<<l: 22Al2885 ITEJIIS INYCLVED1
~AK NN!ER LOCATION COfllOIENT rA1E SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEPI FCV-CC-212A TBAA89* DISCRETE IIJTARY CClll)()ENT COOLIN, SYSTEJII FCV-CC-2128 T8B489 DISCRETE ROTARY CDIPONENT cm..ItE SYST91 FC'HN-217 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t FCY-FW-258A ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t FtY-fW-2518 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t FX-611-181 lMl57 cn.NTER SAS WASTE RADI~TIVE SYST91 FX-Ql-114A IM¥E COONTER BAS WASTE RADIOOCTI\JE SYSTEl'I FX-91-1148 lM56 CCUfl'ER SAS WASTE RADIOOCTIVE SYSTEJII FX-llHMA UAA051 COONTER FX-lW-1148 UAA852 co..NTER HIC-BD-2NA TAAA89 PROCESS CONTROLL£R BLOWIIOWN ISTEAIII GEtERATOR/BOII.ERl SYST84 HIC-BD-2888 TA8489 PROCESS CCWTRO..LER BLOWDOWN (STEAi'II GENERATOR/BOILER> SYSTai HIC-BD-2NC TM418 PROCESS CONTROLL£R SLOWDOWN <STEAJII GENERATOR/BOILER) SYSTEPI fllV-2286A ff t()T IN INV FILE t lllY-2286B ff t()T IN INV FILE t MOV-2286C ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t NJY-2287A ff t()T IN INV FILE t MOV-22878 ff NOT IN INV FILE t NJY-2287C ff t()T IN INV FILE t lll'J-2381 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t lllY-NS-211A TM411 DISCRETE ROTARY NEUTRON SHiaD TANK AND COOL!~ SYSTEl'I fllV-NS-2888 TA8411 DISCRETE ROTARY NEUTRCN SHIELD TANI< AND COOLIN, SYST91 NR-2-46 TAA483 RECORDER Nl.D..EAR INSTRUPIENTATION SYSTEl'I NR-2-47 TAA485 RECORDER NUCLEAR INSTRUIIENTATI~ SYST01 PD1-YS-1N XAB848 IETER V£NTILATI0H SYSTEM PDI-VS-288 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t PDI-VS-281 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t RR-RNS-128P H r<<JT IN INV FILE t RR-RIIIS-228P ff t()T IN INV FILE t SOV-IA-283 TAA313 PUSHBUTT~ INSTRUIIIENT AIR SYST01 SDY-NS-281 TBA418 DISCRETE ROTARY hEUTRON SHIELD TAN< AND COO..IrE SYSIDI SPEEDO-MX ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 TR-BR-128 WAA871 RECORDER BORCN RECOVERY SYSTEJII lV-CC-2159 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 TV-CC-285A ff rtJT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-285C ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 TV-CC-287 ff r<<lT IN INY FILE t .lV-CC-2119 ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-211C ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-212A ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-WS-289 ff t()T IN INV FILE t
.I TV-w-218 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t
tUIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED Nil SURRY TITLE .
l.NIT2 CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSl'tENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22Al2t86 DI~YS ~ VBS TOO LCM/HI6H TO BE VIEWED FROI NJIIR..VIEWIN6 AREA EN6 II -5 11/11/85 tUIAN ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS. Hf PIDLBI DESCRIPTI~a DISPLAYS LOWER TH~ 41" &ABOVE 71" CAtNIT BE VIEWED BY 5TH jTILE FERE FROM N6 AREA. (F~T If' BBi t<<l- VEIWI 1788 PARAGRAPH ru&:R: 6.1.2.2 6.1.2.5.B 9J66ESTED BACl<F IT: DETE8'1Ir£ DISPLAYS THAT AFFECT ~T SAFETY & RELOCATE TO HIGHER/LOWER LOCATION ~ VB TO E NSURE EASE IF VIEWING. Ht DISPOSITION: DIESEL GEtERATOR DISPLAYS-RELOCATE ~ REARRANSE. INCLUDE Tl<<JSE ~ LOCAL DS PANE L. COORDI"'lTE WITH PI-62 12A3833l
- DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NI.Jfl!BER:
TP-1.2 ANTHRIJlOETRICS SURVEY REMRKS:
- 1. 2-4--4. SEE WRITTEN t£D FOR IT91S WITI-OOT ~Rl
S ff "1T IN INV FILE t OORS ~ VCl.TS ff t<<JT IN INY FILE t 118 DISPLAYS ff l()T IN INY FILE 1 um. 118 Pft.
- H t<<JT IN INY FILE t
llJMH ENGINEERirE DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY 22Alt2887 DISPLAYS ON VBS TOO HIGH TO BE VIEWED FRIJI UNIT2 CODE B NJR,R. VIEWI~ AREA.
RESPONSIBILITY EN6 ASSESSMENT STATUS I -2 LAST REVIEW DATE 11/11/85 tUIAN ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS.
/
fff PROIIL9I DESCRIPTICJ4: DISPLAYS HIGHER T191 78" CAfHJT BE VIEWED BY 5TH jTIL.E FEIA.E FRIJI t(JAIQ. YEIWI'43 AREA. (F
~T CF BB>. .
'788 PARAGRAPH M.JIUlER:
&.1.2.2 &.1.2.s.e QJ66EST£D BACl<F IT: .
IIETEf!IIIIrE DISPLAYS THAT AFFECT ~T SAfETY & RELOCATE TO LOWER LOCATION ON VB TO ENSURE E . ASE CF VIEWING.
..... DISPOSITION:
fllVE TA£ND RECORDERS LOWER~~~ SPLIT PARA!ETERS SO THERE ARE 4 SirELE P AAAIETER RECORDERS* DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tOBER: TP-1,2 IWTHIUQETRICS SURVEY AEJIIARKS: 1.2-4-5 ITENS INY(L\Eh lllARK NJIIIBER LOCATION a>>f)()tENT IAIE SVSTEPI SUBSVSTEPI RA-Rlil!H32 H t<<lT IN INV FILE t RR-f!IIIS-133 H hOT IN INV FILE t /
l{Jl!AN EN6INEERI~ DISCREPAl<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 22#l82t88 DISPLAYS~ YBS TOO LOW/HIQI TO VE VIEWED FRCII NORMAL VIEWING AREA RESPONSIBILITY EN6 ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 08/97/85 It.A ERROR:
Irf!BILITY TO READ DI~YS. Hf PROil.9' DESCRIPTI~: DISPLAYS LOWER THAN 41 1 &ABOVE 70 1 CAfHJT BE VIEW8> BY 5TH jTJLE FEJIR.E FRCII NORMAL VIEWI N6 AREA. IF~ IF AUX ~>. 1710 PARAGRAPH rtJfft:R: 6.1.2,2 6.1.2.5.B SU68ESTED BACl<FIT: DETEfilllit£ DI~YS THAT ~FECT PUWT SAFETY &RELOCATE TO HISHER/LOWER LOCATION ON VB TOE NSURE EASE IF VIEWING.
.._ DISPOSITION:
REARRAHSE - ilJX. ~ PAfEL , USE PM. TO RIGHT OF PRESENT PNL. PUT PRI~RY C TRTLS/INSTRtMS ~ LEFT PN-, SECIMlARY ~ RIQIT, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE rtJPIBER: TP-1,2 ANTHRalOETRICS SURVEY R91ARKS1 1.2~-6 ITEMS INIJCl.'S: MRK tt.NER LOCATION CCJIIIPOfENT tM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LI-4678 ff rfJT IN INV FILE f LI-4nB L.AA915 METER ~TER SYSTEM STEA,! 6Et£RATORS LI~97B L.AA916 IETER FEEDWATER SYSTEM Srmi! GErERATORS PI-444A L.AA913 METER REOCTOR coo.ANT (PRHIARY L(D), PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER PI-464B H r<<lT IN INV FILE*
~ EN6IN£ERitf3 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY LWIT2 CODE ASSESSJIIENT UlST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE COlll.T 07/15/85 IDIAN ERROR:
DELAY IN CP RESPCJeE. fff PROa.EM DESCRIPTION: NIJIEIRS ON SCALE ARE NOT VERTICL 8718 PARAGRAPH NJMBER:
- 6. S.2. ~.A
!ll66ESTED BAO<F IT:
CORRECT THE: DISPLAY FACE SO NUfllBERS ARE VERTICAL. DISPOSITION: DELETE-SCALES ARE CURVED (ARCSJ AND NUMBERS SLIGHTLY OfF VERTICAL. HOWEVER, NUMB ERS ARE EASILY READ. NJ ACTION, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUIBER: TP-S.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RalARl<S: JP-6 ITBIS Il'Ml.\e>:
!!ARK NJIIIBER LOCATICW COlflCl£NT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTE.111 N41B H l'(JT IN INV FILE t N42B ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t N438 ff NJT IN INV FILE t PI-cv2911A)2 ff NJT IN INV FILE t PI-cY2811A> 3 ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t PI-cY28l(B)2 HNOT IN INV FILE t PI-cY281A ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t PI-cv2118 H NJT IN INV FILE t l'(JT IN INV FILE RI-CC185 H t RI-CC116 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RI-l.W108 ff NJT IN INV FILE t
tl.MH EN6INE£RI,.; DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- SURRY .UNIT2 l£D NO: 22Al2889 IT01S INYll.YED:
~RI< NJIBEA LOCATION COfRINENT NAIIIE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII RI-RfilS259 ff l'()T IN INV FILE -t RI-sA114 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-55213 ff l'()T IN INV FILE -t RI-SVlll ff l'()T IN INV FILE t AH3W187 ff l'()T IN INV FILE -t RI-SW128 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 AI-SW228 ff l'()T IN INV FILE -t RI-VS183 H l'()T IN INV FILE 1
ftJlllAN E.'EINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODEC ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW HED l'<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2117 l'OHIERMANENT U COORDINATE DESIGNATORS ENG III-8 06/06/85 HlMAN ERROR: POSSIBILITY Cf Tal>ORARY LABELS FALLING !FF CAUSHE DELAY IN CP RESPCNiE. 1H PROIUJII ~SCRIPTI~1 COORDilf!TE DESIGNATORS lJ.I ~!ATOR PAIEI..S ARE r<<lT PERfiRENTLY ENGRAVED. 1788 PARASRAPH MJll:£R: S.3.3.3.C Sl66ESTED r<<KFIT:
~ 'fBl.lORARY DESIGNATORS WITH PERMtaT COORDitflTE D£SI6tflTORS.
14* DISPOSITION: AS PER ABOVE SU66ESTION. SEE PI-85 (20A02106) *
- DATA cn..LECTil:W DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIIBER:
TP-3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW REJl!Alf<S: 3.1-4 ITEMS INVCl.YED i MIIK l'OIBER LOCATION CONlOt£NT NAIIIE SYSTEJII SUBSYST91 COORD DESISS H t()T IN INV FILE t
ltJIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAf.(Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODEC ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82188 IU COORDitflTE DESIGNATORS FOR~ ENS III-8 06/06/85 It.A ERROR: DELAY IN READIN6 DESISNATORS. fff PROll.EM DESCRIPTION: IU COORDINATE LABEL ~RACTERS ARE IIJCH LARSER THAN T~~TERS IN TILE LEEiENDS 9700 PARASRAPH NJIBER: 6.3.3.J~C.3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: REPLACE IDIPORARY DESIGNATORS WITH PERfi!ANENT ENGRAVED DESIGNATORS THAT IEET 0700 GUIDELINE s.
'*'* DISPOSITION:
REFER TO 3.1-4 (22A82107l
- DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTION~~ !UBER:
TP-3. 1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW IE"IRKS: 3.1-5 ITENS INVCl.VED s IIIARK NJIIBER LOCATION COfl>Cl£NT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEfll IU COOR DES ff t(JT IN INV FILE t
ttJ*W ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED t(I TITLE SURRY UNIT2 alDE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22M2119 ILLlMINATED ll.Alt( ANUCIATOR TILES. C()RT 06/06/85 ltJRf ERROR:
IE.AV/ERROR IN IJ> RE~. COflIMJUY ILLLJIIINATED IURII Tl LES CAN LESSEN ~RTIN6 POTENT!~ AND 1DISTRACT CPS.
fH PROIUM D£SCRIPTI0N:
l*.tCIATOR IESSASES ARE TWO PER TILE, Bl.IN< ANNKIATORTILES ARE ILLlJIINATED.
1788 PARAGRAPtl l'OIBER:
6.3.J.3.F S008ESTED BACKFI_T:
anUNATE ILLI.JIIIINATED TILES <TILES WITli(lJT IESSA6ES).
fH DISPOSITIO'f:
DELETE-SURVEY~ PERFORIED WITH ANNUf£IATORS IN *TEST* BI..AtfT IN INV FILE f ALB B ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 I IU C ff rf>T JN INV FILE f ALB D ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f IU E ff r<<lT IN INV FILE f ALB F ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 IU 6 ff NJT IN INV FILE f ALB H ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 IU K ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1
ttJA EMiINEERIN6 DISCREPKY REPORT 02/28/86
- 221112111 IUIBER CF TILES PER ALB EXCEED 51.
SURRY TITLE *
~IT2 CODE A RE~IBILITV ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 96/96/85 11.M ERROR:
DELAY IN (J) RESPOOSE. <DELAY IN LOCAT1N6/IDNTIFYIN6 /UR,!). Hf PR01UN DESCRIPTION:
~ 1U CONTAINS l<<lRE THAN 51 TILES. ALBS A, B, C, D, 6, H, J&K ~ 64 TILES (8X8> ; ALBS E&F H
!WE 81 TILES 18Xll>.
8789 PARAGRAPH MJillER:
- 6. 3. 3. 3. D. 1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT:
FUfCTIINUY GRO.P ~ DEMARCATE !US. Hf DISPCISITI~: REFER TO ANtN:IATOR STUDY PI-85 121A02196l
- DATA m..LECTil>>C DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE rDBER:
TP-3.1 Aff(JNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REMARKS: 3.1-9 ITBIS IN'Jll.VED1 _ NAIi< UBER LOCATION COflPONENT , - SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII IUA ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1. IUB ff l'<<JT IN INV FIL£ t IU C ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ALB D ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ I IU E ff l(IT IN INV FILE t ALB F ff NOT IN INV FILE t IU 6 ff l(IT IN INV FILE 1 IU H ff l'<<JT IN INV FILE 1 IU J H MlT IN INV FILE t IU K ff l'<<lT IN INV FILE I
ltMN EN6Il'£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED Ml 22Al21 l 1 M. MEANING TILE LEGEHDS.
TITLE SURRY ~IT2 CODE A RESPCtEIBILITY ASSESSIIIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 96/87/85 EN6 tlJIAH ERIKJR: DELAY IN IP REP(NlE. HI PROBI.BI DESCRIPTION: DIA.-fEANING, r<<lN-SPECIFIC TILE NESSSA6ES. 878" PARAGRAPH MJIBER: 6,3,3.4.C SU36ESTED BACl<FIT: COIIUTER GENERATED IURM.TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC to,IPONENT,
... DISPOSITION:
REFER TO ANN STUDY PER PI-85 (20A02106). HI-l.O ANN TIILES ~T CHAt<<D Site£ IP W
!lLD NEXT LOO< AT IND TO VERIFY, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NUIIIBER:
TP-3,l ArfOICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW TP-8. 1 COOENTIOHS SURVEY REJIIARKS: 3.1-1, LISTED ITEJIIS SIO..LD BE SPLIT,. OTl£RS lllAY BE Dili¥.., ITEJIIS ItMl.VEih MARK rullER LOCATION C()flffl£NT rM SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM A ~4 ff NJT IN INV FILE I A ~5 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 A A-6 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 AB-1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 A B-5 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 AB~ ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 BB-1 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 B B-2 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 B D-7
- ff MIT IN INV FILE 1 B E-1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 B E-7 H NlT IN INV FILE t
tUMN Et.6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT V/2/28/86
- l£D NO: 22A821 ll ITEJIIS INYa..YED:
SURRY UNIT2 MAK NJMBER LOCATION COlflOf£NT NUE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII D~1 H NJT IN INV FILf
- D~J HNOT IN INV FILf I DB-1 H NJT IN INV FILf
- DB-J HNOT IN INV FILE t DC-1 HNOT -IN INV FILf f DC-J H NOT IN INV FILE t DD-1 H NJT IN INV FILf
- DD-J H t<<lT IN INV FILf I DE-1 H NJT IN INV FILf t DE-5 HNOT IN INV FILf I DF-19 H NJT IN INV FILE t DF-2 ff NJT IN INV FILf t D6-1 H NJT IN INV FILf
- 6 84 ff NJT IN INV FILE*
6 B-7 H NJT IN INV FILf t 6C4 ff NJT IN INV FILE t 6 D-4 ff NJT IN INV FILE* H~J ff NJT IN INV FILE f
- HB-J f f t<<JT IN INV FILE*
HC-J H NlT IN INV FILf
- HD-6 H t<<JT IN INV Fllf t HF-2 HNOT IN INV FILf
- HF-5 ff NJT IN INV FILf f HF-f, ff t<<JT IN INV FILE*
H F-7 H NJT IN INV FILE* J 1H ff t<<JT IN INV FILf
- J E-4 H NJT IN INV FILE t K~J ff NOT IN INV FILE f KE-8 f f NJT IN INV FILE t
EH6INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT t<<JA 02/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CODE A AS&SSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPOOIBILITY STATUS DATE
~U2 INADEQIJITE LETTER t£I6HT ON ~IATORS. ENS II -5 16/16/85 KMAN ERROR:
DELAY IN CPERATOR RESP!HlE. fH PROllBI DESCRIPTI~: . L£TTER HT IF .20*: ANN~ STA DISTIK.£ EXCEEDS se* IIIRXVIEWIN6 DISTIKE FOR .20* HI6H LET TERINi>. 8788 PARA6Rf¥1H ttl&R: 6.3.3.5.A.1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RE-81,RAVE TILES TO IEET 0788 6UIDa.INES. fH DISPOSITION:
. REFER TO ANNUICIATOR STUDY Pl-85 l20A02116>
- DATA m.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-3.l Arft.lNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW RalARKS:
- 3. l-12
!TENS ltMl.'JED:
MRK IOSER LOCATION COfllONENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H t()T IN INV FILE t
IUAN EN6INEERIN6 DISC:REPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILIJY STATUS DATE 22Al2114 UAIEQtJITE WIDTH-T1-t£I6HT RATIO ON AltUCIATDR ~TERS, ENG II -5 06/06/85 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN a> RESPONSE. fff PROILEJII IESCRIPTICIN: roER. WIDTH-To-t£I6HT RATIO IS LESS T~ 3:5.; IT IS 2:5 AND CHAIW:TERS APPEAR UM3 AND IAfRCM. 8788 PARAGRAPH ft.lllBER: 6,3,3.5.D.3 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: REPUa W/ TILES THAT~ CORRECT B780 GUIDELINES RECQIJIIENDED NUMER. WIDTH-TO-t£I6HT RAT IO (F 3:5. Hf DISPOSITION:
- REFER TO ANUCIATOR STLl>Y PER PI-85 (2BA02106l *
- DATA CB.LECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NUMBER:
TP-3.1 IMDICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW 3.1-J ITENS IJMLYED: NARK USER LOCATION COflOfOT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IU. N LETT ff NJT IN INV FIL.£ t
ltJtAil EN6IfEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 aJDE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED Nl TITLE RESPtWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2115 LETTER SPACINS-INADEDTE SPACING ~ ft<<.KIATOR TILE L11'£S. EN6 II -5 86/86/85
. It.A ERROR:
DELAY IN o> RESPONSE.
/
1H PROBLEJil DESCRIPTION:
~ BEnEEN LitES ON NKIATOR TILES (.88 IS LESS THAN CW£ 1R.F THE ~TER HEIGHT 1
)
(l/2 If' .29"=.lt"). 9718 PARAS~ tOBER: 6.3.3.5.D.6 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IE-BERAYE IM<<.KIATOR TILES TO ,£ET 1710 6UIDELINES. 1H DISPOSITION: REFER TO IMJCIATOR STUDY PI-85 (20A821"6l
- DATA cru..ECTION DESCRIPTI~ ~ aJDE UBER:
TP-3. 1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEPIS REVIEW REMARKS: J.1-6 ITEJIIS IN\ICl.VED: IIARK fUISER LOCATION ~ T tAE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM ANN TILES ff t()T IN INV FILE t
/
t<<JIIAN EN:iINEERlrE DlSCREPAN:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY ll4IT2 CODE A ASS£SSIIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESP!HiIBIUTY STATUS DATE 22Al2116 SIL.Ba a>>mo.s FOR ANU<<:IATORS. EN6 II -5 96/16/85 HJAI ERROA1 11£LAY IN SILOCINS AVAIUiU INLN:IATOR Ii.ARN. Hf PROIUJII IIESCRIPTI~: TI£ N CTILS Clil BBS llEUJI li.B J-AND C, RESPECTIVELY, DO NJT ~ ANN SIL.aa COO'RO.S. 97N PARA6RAPH tUll£R: 6.3.4.1.A.1 SlSiESTED BOCKFIT: PROVIDE ANN.JrCIATOR SIL.aa PUSlilUTTON FOR USC &J, Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-37 (28883885> DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTIB, ~ CODE NIIIIER: TP-3.1 ANM.WICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW R0IAll(S: 3.1-8 ITEMS IrMl.VED: AK JOIIER LOCATION COfRlQT NAIE SYST91 S1JBSYST9I N CTILS H NJT IN INV FILE t
~ - EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE RESPCiEIBILITV ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22Al2117 ANIUCIATOR mmn LABEI.IN6/CODIN6. CIJlll.T 96/96/85 tl.R ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESPOilSE. fff PROllBI DESCRIPTlm.: al..OR/S>f.lPE ITVPE IF CTRL> FOR ~ CTRLS SIMILAR TO CTRLS FOR: SI ACMTION, CIS ACMTIIJ,I I REACTOR TRIP, (RMRI() 17N PAAAGR1¥1H NJMBER:
- 6. 3. 4.2. B. 4
£1.166ESTED BACKFIT:
PROYIDE LABEi. OR COLOR CODE PUSHBUTTON TO ENSURE EASY ID£NTIFICATI0N OF ANM.JtCIATOR COHTRO LS. fH DISPOSITIIJ,I: DELETE- CONTln.S IN (1£STIIJ,I ARE APPROPRIATELY SRCX.PED, SAFETY SYS CONTROLS OOAR DED ~ KWE al..OR CODED LABELS. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTIIJ,I ~ CODE tUIBER: TP-3.1 AMOICIATOR SVSTENS REVIEW REIWll<S: 3.1-7. PROB DESC ICOO'>: SI RESET, CIS RESET, RX TRIP RESET ITENS IN'Al.\/ED: NARK !UBER LOCATim. COIIP(lENT rM SYSTEM* SUBSYSTEJII ANN CTIU ff NlT IN INY FILE t
ttJlllAH El'EINEERIN6 DISCREPAl<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED I'<<)
22Al212J I'<<)
. SURRY TITLE PRINTOOT FOR Ill.TI-INPUT Alft.lCIATOR.
~IT2 CODE A RESPONSIBILITY EN6 ASScSSIENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 11M ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN ex> REsm&:, 1H Pm.Bl DESCRIPTICJI: fll.TI-INIUT ANN.N:IATOR DOES r<<!T ~ ~ PRINTOOT. I~ILITY TO D£TE1!MINE lffIDi ~ H AS BEEN ~TIVATED, 87N PARASRAPH MER: 6.3.1.2.C.2 QJ66£STED BACl<F IT: INSTIU PRINTOUT CAPABILITIES FOR IU.TI-IN>UT Atf<<JNCIATORS. 1H DISPOSITICJI: REFER TO PI-85 (28A92116) AND PI-2 (20Al2101> ANN.t<<:IATOR STUDY *
- DATA cw.ECTICJI DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE OBER:
TP-3.1 ~ICIATDR. SYSTBIS R£\1IEW REl'ARKS: C-17 ITENS INYCLle: NARK IOIIER LOCATICJI l:OfllOENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM UTI-IN ANN H NJT IN INY FILE t
lI I It.A EN6IrEERIN6 DISCREPAICf R£PORT 02/28/86
- TITLE 22A82126 TEJClORARY ANfUCIATOR TILE IESSA6ES.
SURRY ~IT2 CODE REsmEIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS CCNU LAST REVIEW DATE
'116/07/85
~ ERROR:
INABILITY TO DETERIIIINE IF IMOCIATOR TILE IS LIT. Y/ERROR IN CP RESPCWSE. 11-f PRCIILEM D£SCRIPTICW: TWO INUCIATOR TILES USE DY~ TIV'E TO DISPLAY IESSASES 0790 PA~RAPH NUIBER: 6.3.3.5.C.1 Sl.GGESTED BOCKFIT: ItCREASE LETIER t£ISHT TO ~ORM TO 0700 6UIDELH£ RECOPUENDED t£ISHT FOR CRS VIEWirE DIS TAl'<<:E. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-APHJCIATORS ~ BEEN l()VEI) P£R DC 83-85. IESSA6ES ARE rtlW OORAVED ON P ANEL VNTX-R. DATA cou..ECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NJMBER: TP-3.1 Arft.lNICIATOA SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REIIARKS: 3.1-11 I TEJIIS INVCi~: lflRK f'OIBER LOCATIOH COfl)()£NT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEPI
~ TILE IES H r(JT IN INV FILE 1
tUMN Et4i1t£.ERIN6 DISCREPAOCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED r<<l TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODEC RESPONSIBILITY ASSES9ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A82127 DE*IRCATI~ LINES ~ ALBS. NOD III-8 96/96/85 KR ERROR:
D£LAY /ERROR IN OP RESPO&. Ht- PROBt.8' DESCRIPTI~: DYNATAPE IS L£D FOR DE~RCATION LINES ON ~ E $WO F. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.6.6.2.C SUSSESTED BACl<FIT: INSTALL PERPIANENT .DelARCATION LINES. US£ HISHLY DURABLE TAPE SUCH AS 'l!TO PINSTRIPIN6.
*** DISPOSITION:
AS PER ABOVE .BAO<f IT*
- DATA CD...LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER:
TP-3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATI~ AIDS SURVEY IDIARKS: 3.1-2 ITEMS INVll.VED:
~RK tOIBER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAfilE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IU E ff rtJT IN INV FILE*
ALB F ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
IUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 13/17/86 SURRY llcIT 2 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai2229 POOR ~TRAST ~ DISPLAYS. ENG II -6 83/17/86 fiMN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN [P RE~.
./
Hf: PR0Bt£III DESCRIPTI~:
~RAST ON VERTICAL SCALES IS POOR.
8710 PARAGRAPH tu!BER: 6.5.1.3.C.1 6.5.1,3. C.2 SUSGESTED BACl<FIT:
~ COLOR CONTRAST OF TH£ SC/US.
Hf: DISPOSITION:
~~Pt.ATES TO WHITE CSEE LI-cN-100 AND Ll-cN-101)
- DATA 00...LECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE UBER:
TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY
~RKS:
JP-1 I TEIIIS Il'MlLVED: LOCATION COMPONENT NAP!!: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM YI-1Jf11S-290A NAA319 fETER MAIN STEAM SYSTE~ PRESSURIZER YI-IJIIIS-280B NAB319 PETER MAIN STEAi'! SYSTEl'I PRESSURIZER YI-YIIIS-201C '"319 11£TER MAIN STEAM SYSTE" PRESSURIZER
- I
~ EN3INEERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY LWIT2 CODE ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW HED t() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 221182221 MESSA6ES PRINTED ON DISPLAY F~S SH00LD BE BRIEF. COR.T 87/1S/85
~ ERROR:
DWlY IN READING DISPLAY. fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: Itf=ORJIIATION ON VERTICAL SCIU DISPLAY FACES ARE REDl.N>ANT WITH INFORIIIATION ON .NAfE PLATES. 0710 PARAGRAPH Nt&R:
- 6. 5. 4.1. C SIJ36ESTED BAO<FIT:
aIIIII~TE REDUNDANCY FR[lll VERTIC&l. SCALES DISPLAY FACES. DISPOSITION: DELETE - THESE SHWLD BE CONSIDERED APART OF LABELING STUDY !SEE PI-82 129Aell0
- 1).)
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIIBER: TP-S.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE*\RKS: JP-S ITEJIIS INYCl.VED: -
!ARK tUIBER LOCATION COIIPClf,ENT NAfE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM VERT~ H t()T IN INV FILE f
HUMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED NIJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~ IIIRE mlN NINE GRADUATI~ SEPARATE NIIEIR.S 00 nE SCIU. II -6 85/82/85 ttJIW ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESP06E. fH PROBlBI DESCRIPTIOO: IIIORE THAN NINE S~TIONS SEPARATE N>>IERALS ON SCALES. 07e0 PARAGRAPH NlllBER: 6.5.1.5.A.1. 6.5.4.1,C SUGSESTED BACKFIT: REPLACE WITH SCIU SHClHNG ~ S AT EVERY 10TH INCREJENT. fH DISPOSITION: REPLACE SCIUS WITH ONES SH()jIN6 UEIRS EVERY 11TH INCREll£NT*
- DATA 00..LECTIOO DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NlMBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: JP-7 IIDIS INV0-"9: PIARK NUMBER LOCATION COIIIONENT NAIi£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 2-cN+lA M8216 IETER COODENSATE SYSTEM 2-cN+lB 1¥1:216 IETER CCNlENSATE SYSTEM 2-cN+lC AAA217 IETER CONDEhSATE SYSTEM 2-FW-P-JA AAB215 IETER FEEDWATER SYSTEM 2-FW-P-3B AAA216 IETER FEEDWATER SYSTEJII 2-FW-PHU ff NJT IN INV FILE t 2-FW-PI-A2 ff NJT *IN INV FILE
- 2-FW-Pl-82 ff NOT IN INV FILE t 2-RC-P-lA AAA118 EER REACTOR COCIMT (PRl~Y UXP, PWR> SYS 2-RC-P-18 AA8118 IETER REACTOR ro.:uwT (PRIMARY LCXP, PWR> SYS 2-RC-P-lC AAA119 PIETER REACTOR COil.ANT !PRIPIARY UXP, PWR> SYS
HlJ!AN EN6IrEERIN6 DISCREPIWCY REPORT 82/28/86
- ITEPIS INYCl.VED:
MRK NJIIIIIER LOCATION COfllONENT NAME SURRY UNIT2 SYSTEM S1JBSYST0I 2-RS-P-lA AAC107 IETER CIMAINENT RECIRCll.ATitE SPRAY SYSTEM 2-RS-P-1B AAA118 METER CIMAINIENT RECIRCUI.ATIN6 SPRAY SYSTBI 2-RS-P-2A 1¥ml08 IETER CONTAINENT AECIRCll.ATitE SPRAY SYSTEM 2-RS-P-28 AAC108 IETER CllflAINENT RECIRCUI.ATIN6 SPRAY SYSTBI OC-P-lA ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-2-158 PAB324 METER ()£JIIICll. AND VOLIJE comn SYSTEM LETIDiW FI-2122-A ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-2168 HNOT IN INV FILE t FW-PI-2446 ff NOi IN INV FILE t FW-PI-2447 H NOT IN INV FILE f LR-CS-200 OAA388 RECORDER CONTAINENT SPRAY SYST01 LR-CS-212 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-201A #'IAA915 PIETER NAIN ST£AIII SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-2'1B *IB915 IOER IIIAIN STEAM SYST01 PRESSURIZER PI-201C 11&¥l916 l'IETER NAIN STEAM SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-2145 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-2168 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-24e2-1 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-2472 HNOT IN INV FILE t PI-444A LAA913 IETER REOCTOR COlUWT (PRIMRY LOCJl, PWR> SYS. PRESSURIZER PI-L0-200 RAA424 IIETER LUBE OIL ITREATIENT/STORA6E ONLY> SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD RCP-TR-2448 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-Fl24254 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RCS-fI-2414 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2415 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RCS-FI-2416 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2424 HNOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2425 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2426 HNOT IN INV FILE f
. RCS-FI -2434 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2435. ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2436 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t RCS-PI-24e2 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-TI-2411B ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-TI-2412A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RCS-TI-24128 ff NOT IN IPN FILE t RCS-TI-2412C ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 5-FW-PI-Bl ff NOT IN INV FILE t TI-2-453 RAA320 IETER REOCTOR COCLANT (PRIMRY LOOP, PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER TI-2-454 RAB329 METER REOCTOR coo.ANT (PRIMRY LIXJ>, PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER TI-2450 ff NlT IN IPN FILE t
llM EN6IN£ERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY Lt4 IT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82223 EXCESS Itf=ORMATION IS PAINTED~ DISPlAY FACE. COR.T U/15/85 tUIAH ERROR: DELAY IN READitE DISPLAY.
- fff PROIUM DESCRIPTION:
*M.f'~TURERS T~RK IS PRINTER ON Tf£ DISPLAY F~
IB700 PARAGRAPH OBER:
- 6. 5.1, 4, B Sl.66ESTED BACKFI T:
ELHHrf\TE Tl£ TRADE1'ARK ON THE FACE CF THE DISPLAY, 1-14 DISPOSITION: DEL£TE - TRADEMARKS DISPLAY FACES DO t{)T INTERFERE WITH READABILITY* ON DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY R91ARl<S: JP-4. ITOO INY: l'AJORITY OF METERS, t()T INCLUDif<<l RECORDERS IIDIS JNY(l.VED:
!!ARK NJMBER LOCATION C()M)()£NT NW: SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII IETERS H t()T IN INY FILE f
ttM ENGINEERIN6 DISCREPArCV REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSl'IENT
- LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al222~ CIRCl.l.AR SOl.E VALUES !~REASE WITH CLOCKWISE *lY9IENT OF POINTER. ID-lT 11/31/86 IOIAN ERROR:
DELAY IN CP RESPONSE. 1H PROfUN DESCRIPTION: CIRCll.AR SC~ VAll.lES DO t(JT Ir£REAS£ W/ CLOCKWISE lllVEIENT. 5aUS IS LOCATED ARCXMD AlE RO OR rtll POINT 1711 PARAGRAPH tUIBER: 6.5.2.l,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IDENTIFY AND LABEL VALUES OF D.E AROI.JID THE ZERO OR tt.lL POINT, 1H DISPOSITION: DELETE - THESE IETERS ARE WITHIN ELECTRIC POWER CONVENTION. t(JR,R. DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: JP-11 ITEMS INW.VED: IIARK NJMBER LOCATION CIMICltNT ~ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM GEN IESAYARS ff t(JT IN INV FILE f RES Bil. VOLT ff NOT IN INV FILE*
It.A EN6INEERIIE DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CODE ASSSSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE REsmEIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82225 VERT~ YALUES SHOOLl) Il'CREASE W/ lJlWARD IIJVBIIENT CF POINTER. COR..T 07/15/85 IUAil ERROR: CAN RESLlT IN ADELAY IN READirE THE SClti, I fff PROFUM DESCRIPTION: VERTICll. SCALE VALLES DO r<<JT Il'CREASE WITH UPWARD IIJV8ENT CF POINTER. 0700 PA~RAPH NUMBER: 6, 5. 2.1. B S006ESTED BACKFIT: REPIJV:E WITH SCALE THAT It£REASES WITH UPWARD IIOYalENT CF POINTER, fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-flETERS ARE WITHIN t()Rl'A. ELECTRIC POIER CONVENTIDH.
- DATA CO...LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RENARKS: JP-12. 13 1£TERS) ITEMS INVO..VED: MRI< rtfflBER LOCATION COfllOhENT rfW: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII H r<<JT IN IrN FILE f
.t
OOINEERIN6 DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT tlMf '2.lcB/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2226 POINTER TIPS CCNEl. 6~TICIN NARKS OR NIJEIR.S, II -7 85/82/85 IUIAN ERROR: InAY/ERROR IN CP RESPCNE. fff PROBLEII DESCRIPTION: POINTER TIPS COtaAL D.E 6RAIJUATION JIIARKS OR NJIIERALS. e7ee PA~RAPH NUMBER:
- 6. s. 2, 2. A. 2 S006ESTED BACKFIT:
l)¥lN6E POINTER TIPS TO PIINIJIIIZE cor<<::EAUENT OF SCIU 6~TION IIIARKS OR tUIERALS. . Hf DISPOSITION: RND INDICS: i COrcEALE BUT OBVIOUS FROPI IP POSITION. IRP INDICS: POINTER '41RRCM AS POSS W/0 IIIIPAIRIN6 READAFlTY DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE NlJIIIB£R: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: JP-14
!TOO INYO.VED: -
JIIARK ~R LOCATION CCJIIP()IENT f4II£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM IRP INDICS ff NJT IN INY FILE t ROOND IND ICS H NJT IN INY FILE I
lt.R.EN:!INEERIIE DISCREPAtCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~ 7 POINTER/BOCKGROOND a:NTRAST, POINTER SIZE ItfUBIT RAPDI REC06NITIO tO£ CDRT to/87/85 KJNAH ERROR:
~Y/ERROR IN CP RESPCHiE.
Hf PRDa.al IIESCRIPTI~: POINTER/BACKSR(XN) CONTRAST AND POINTER SIZE DIES NJT PERMIT RAPID RECtJ;NITI~ CF POINTER POSITION. 1780 PARAS~ rtJIIIBER: 6,5.2.2,C SUS6ESTED MCKFIT:
~ POINTER SIZE OR POINTER/JW:KSRCNHl CONTRAST TO ~OW FOR RAPID REC06NITI~ CF POINT ER POSITION.
Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-POINTER SIZE IS ADE~TE FOR READABILITY. WIDER POINTER .<<)11.D BLOCI< ~ MRKIN3S. NO ACTION. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE MJIIIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REIIIRKS: JP-15 ITEJIIS INYCl.VED: MRK fUIBER LOCATION COIIJOPENT NAf£ SYST8' SUBSYST8' CRD SI24i B ff r<<)T IN INV FILE 1 DETECTOR A ff NOT IN INV FILE* DETECTOR B ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 DETECTOR C 11 NOT IN INV FILE I DETECTOR D ff r<<)T IN INV FILE I DETECTOR E ff t<<JT IN INV FILE
- 1121-tfi-281 IETER HYDROOEN SAS SYST8' N31 SRCE RN6 ff NOT IN INV FILE*
N32 SRCE RNS ff r<<)T IN HN FIL£ 1
. N35 INT RN6 ff r<<)T IN INV FILE *
- N36 INT RN6 HNOT IN INV FILE 1
ttJMN ENSINEERil'ti DISCREPANCY R£PORT f/2./28/86
- HED NO: 22A82227 IT91S INYO..VED:
- NARK rtJf!BER LOCATlc>>I CC!llfflENT NM::
SURRY UNIT2 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM N37 CONPRTR ff tCIT IN INY FILE 1 N41A AVG PWR ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 N41B LWR DET ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 N41B ll>R llET ff NOT IN INV FILE f N42A AY6 PWR ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 N42B LWR DET ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 N42B UPR DET ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 N43A AVG PWR ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 N43B LWR DET ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f N43B UPR DET .ff P<<lT IN INV FILE f N44A AVG PWR ff rfJT IN .INV FILE 1 N448 LWR DET H NOT IN INV FILE 1 M44B UPR DET ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PDI-YS-108 XAB048 METER VENTILATI~ SYSTEfll PDI-YS-101 ff r<<JT IN .INV FILE 1 PDI-YS-218 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PDI-VS-201 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 POINTERS ff P<<lT IN INV FILE 1 RI-CC-105 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-CC-186 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-Oi-118 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 RI-Ot-119 ff P<<lT IN INV FILE f RI-at-218 ff P<<lT IN INV FILE 1 RI-at-219 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-i3W-101 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 RI-91-102 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RI-LW-108 ff NOT IN INY FILE 1 RHIS-128 P ff NOT IN INY FILE 1 RI-fllS-227 0 HNOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-Rf! SERIES ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-8'16-127 I ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-8'16-228 P ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-RIIIS-259 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-8'16-268 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI -8'16-261 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-8'16-262 . ff P<<lT IN INV FILE 1 RI-RJIIS-263 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 *' RI-Rf!IS-264 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-SA SERIES ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-SS-213 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-SS-215 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-SV-111 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-SV-211 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 RI-SW-107 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 RI*128 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-SW-201 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RI-SW-214 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
llM EtEINEERINi DISCREPAICY REPORT ~/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 HED NO: 22A82227 ITEMS INVCI.VED: IIARK rtlMBER LOCATI~ ClJIIRJ£NT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RI-SW-215 ff NOT IN INV FIL£ t RI-sw-216 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RI-SW-217 ff NOT IN INV FIL£ t RI-VS-114 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
H1.1MN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT 02./28/86 SURRY Lt,iIT2 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NOD II -7 17/11/85 KJ1AN ERROR: DISPLAY READirE ERROR. 1H PROBl9I DESCRIPTI~: NJ saL£ ON TR - PAPER IS '3Cll.ES, BUT NOT TR ITSELF. 1798 PARAGRAPH UBER:
- 6. 5.1. 4. A SU36ESTED BACl<FIT:
INSTIU SCIU ON TR. lff DISPOSITION:
~ OR REMRK SC~ £ AS IPPROPRIATE*
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIP~ IO't AND CODE NJ,JIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFI:ATI0'1 AND VALIDATION TP-5. l DISPLr,YS Sl' ~ REMARKS: VI-71. 1-EM INVOLVED ON RCP S8l. I.EAl<OFF FL.Bi - LO RN6 ITEJIS INYCl.VED: NARK ru&'.R L .cATION CIWClNENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FR-2-25.\B SM315 RECORDER ~TOR COOJWT (PRIMARY LOCP~ PWR> SYS
HUIAN ENGINEERIM3 DISCREPIKY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al23l8 LEGEND l£SSA6E CCMAINS JIORE TWW THREE LINES CF TEXT. r<<lD II -6 81/31/86 KJ1AN ERROR: DELAY IN (J) RESPONSE. / 1H PROJll.91 DESCRIPTION: LE6END l'IESSAGE CONTAINS !()RE T~ THREE L1r£S IJ:' TEXT. 8788 PARllGRAPH NI.MBER:
- 6. S. 3. 3. B. 5 6. 6. 4, 2. D. 3 su;GESTED BACKFIT:
USE ABBREVIATIONS TO REDUCE Tl£ UBER CF LINES [f. TEXT. fff DISPOSITION: REVIEW AND REWRITE IESSAGES - AEOO TILES AS REQUIRED FORCLARITY. LOOI< AT~ TIL
- ES. REFER TO PI-69 (28A82383>
- DATA cou.ECTION D£SCRIPTI0N AND CODE: NllflBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REfl.ARKS: JP-2. ITEJIIS INY(LYED 1
~RK N.Jf!BER LOCATION C(M)l)ENT NAf£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM BYP STAT LTS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t PERM STAT LT ff NOT IN INV FILE t TRIP STAT LT ff NJT IN INV FILE t
tUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CO~
RESPONSIBILITY ASScSSIIIENT STATUS LAST R£VIEW DATE
~311 AFEW l'OHESEND INDICATOR Llfi!TS DO lfJT ~ APPARENT IEANIN6S. WIPI..T 87/11/85 tUIAN ERROR:
IIISINTERPRETATION OF LIGHT JIIEANING. INCREASED REL.IKE ON ME IIJRY. fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~: LISTED INDICATOR LIGHTS ARE r()T. LABELED TO EXPLAIN IEANil'E OF LIGHTS lf£N LIT. 87N PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5.3.2.A.1 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: l(JDIFY LABELS TO EXPLAIN fllEANIN6 OF INDICATOR. LISHTS lffN LIT. fff DISPOSITI~: DELETE-THESE ARE "POWER AVAILABLE' LIGHTS AND ARE WITHir<<:l)IVENTION. I\O ~TION NE EDED* DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-25-1 ITBIS INVB.',B: - MRK OBER . LOCATION l:Oi'IPllENT NA,£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 2H1-214 SAA125 LIGHT CHEMICAL AND YCl.lJE CONTROL SYSTEM L.ETllCMN 2J1-163 6AB125 LISHT 0£JIIICAL AND IJCl.lDE ~TRll. SYSTEII LETDCI.N 2J1-2-124 IR:125 LIGHT D£111ICAL N YOUJIE CONTRll. SYSTEII L.ETDll,iW H2A-6W-11M EAA181 LifilT SAS WASTE RADIM:TI~ SYSIDI SUBSYSIDI FIRST RECORD VB21138 AAAlll LlSHT HYDR06EN CONTAINfllENT SYSTEM
- SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD VB 2 111 28 AAA183 Llfi!T HYDROOEN ~AINENT SYSIDI SUBSYSIDI FIRST RECORD VB31138 ff r()T IN INV FILE f VB-1-111-28 6BB101 LIGHT HYDROSEN CONTAitfENT SYSTEM VB-2-1-29 SAB111 LIGHT HYDROSEN CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
- IJB-2-IIJ-30 6BA183 LIGHT HYDR06EN C!l.TAINIIIENT SYSTEM
ltJMAN EN6INEERIN6 D19:REPAN::Y REPORT 82/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE A RESPOOSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22Al2311 A FEW fOH.ESEND INDICATOR LISHTS DO t<<lT ~VE ~RENT IJ!EANitES. ENS II -5 il/38/86 It.A ERROR:
IIIISINTERPRETATI()I OF LISHT IEANHE. lfCREASED RELIArCE ()I ,IE IIIRV. fH PROBL91 IIE9:RIPTI()I:
~R ~ lfiITE N'.IN-L£6END INDICATOR LIBHT PAIRS LISTED ARE NOT LABELED TO EXPUUNINS IEAN INS CF LIGHTS WHEN UT 071!10 PARAGRAPH NU~R:
6.5.3.2.A.l SU66£STED BACKFIT: IIIODlFY LABELS TO EXPLAIN ~HE OF INDICATOR LISHTS lifiEN LIT. fH DISPOSITION: LABEL EACH LISHT TO IDENTIFY INDIVIDUAL STATUS. REFER TO PI-82 120A01101l,
- DATA CO..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI()I AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJl!ARl<S: DS-25-2 ITEMS INVCl.VED: MRK NJMBER LOCATI()I CIJlllllOtENT NAPE SYSTal SUBSYSTEM AIIIBER STATUS ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 WHITE STATUS HNOT IN INV FILE t
ENiINEERING DISCREPArCY REPORT
~ 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODEC ASSES91ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2312 AFEW tOH.E6END INDICATOR LIGHTS DO r<<IT ~ APPARENT IIEANINSS. NOD III-9 97/11/85 KJilAN ERROR:
NISINTERPRETATION OF LIGHT IEANIN6. INCREASBI RELIIW;E 1),1 ~ fl>RY, 14* PROBLEM 1l£SCRIPTI~: LISTED INDICATOR LIGHTS AR£ NOT uunED TO EXPLAIN IEANIN6 OF LIGHTS WHEN LIT. 1708 PARAGRAPH NUIBER:
- 6. 5. 3. 2. A. 1 SUGGESTED BACl<FIT:
IIIODIFY L.ABaS TO EXPLAIN IEANIN6 OF INDICATOR LISHTS WHEN LIT. 14* DISPOSITION: LABEL SPAR£ LIGHTS: "SPAR£"
- DATA COLLECTICW DESCRIPTICW AND CODE Nl1'1EER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE!fflRKS: DS-25-3 ITE1'S INY!l.VED: NARK NlJIIIBER LOCATION CIJlilPOf£NT FAE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII YB SEC 2-2 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1
/
lfJl¥lN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREP!M:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22Ai2313 i, FEW IOH.EGEND INDICATOR LIQiTS DO l<<:IT ~ i¥>PARENT IIEWINSS. II -5 il/38/86 IAJIAf .ERROR:
IIISINTERPRETATION OF LI6HT ~INS. INCREASED RELIKE ~ IE flKIRY Ht PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: LISTED INDir.ATOR Ll6HTS AR£ rt'.IT LABELED TO EXPLAIN ~IN6 QF LlSHTS WHEN LIT. 07N PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.5.3.2.A. l Sl66ESTED BACl<FIT: l(JDIFY LABELS TO EXPLAIN IEANIN6 OF INDICATOR LISHTS lfiEN LIT. Hf )ISPOSITION: LABEL AND DE1¥1RCATE LISHTS WITH PUSHBUTTON. REFER TO LABEL STUDY PER PI-82 (i?:iAe lHU), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUIIBER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY AE1¥1RKS: ns-;:'5-4 ITENS ItMl.VEr :
!!ARK rt!MBER LOCATION COlflOHENT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM S0V-VS-li1A YMMS RELAY VENTILATION SYSTEIII SOV-VS-181B TMeab PUSHBUTT~ VENTILATI~ SYSTBI SOV-vs-281P TAA087 PUSHBUTTON VENTILATION SYSTEM SOV-VS-281J TM088 PUSHBUTT~ VENTILATI~ SYSTEM
- TITLE HI.MAN SURRY EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT UNIT2 CODE A RESP!M,IBILITY 03/03/86 ASSESS!tlENT STATUS LAST R£VIEW DATE 22Al231~ AFEW NON-LEGEND INDICATOR LIGHTS DO r<<JT ~ APPARENT MEANINGS. ENS JI -5 01/30/86 HUA ERROR:
IUSINTERPRETATI~ Of LIGHT MEANING. INCREASED RELIAtCE ON ME MORY. Hf PROBi..01 DE&:RIPTI~: LISTED INDICATOR LIGHTS ARE NOT LABELED TO EXPLAIN MEANIFE ~ LIGHTS Wl£N LIT. 0700 PARAGRAPH NI.JIIIBER: 6.5.3.2.A.1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: l'l(JlDIFY LABELS TO EXPLAIN MEANING Of INDICATOR LISHTS WHEN LIT. DISPOSITION: ENSURE SY,C LIGHTS ON DIESEL ~s ARE LABELED "SYNC"
- DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE N\JIIBER:
TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJl!ARKS: DS-25-5 ITEJIIS INVO...VED:
- IIAIIK N.JMBER LOCATI~ COIPCMNT NAIi£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM J CONT PN.. ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
ltJMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAHCY R£PORT 02/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2419 sal.ES PRINTED~ RECORDIN6 PAPER ARE l'()T SAt'E AS sci:u:s ON RCRDR. ENG I -2 Vki/97/85 HMlN ERROR: DELAY IN IJ> RESPCJEE.
/
Hf PROIUN DES:AIPTil)h SC$l.ES PAINTED ON RECORDitE PAPER t()T SAfE AS saus ON RCRDR. t() SC$US OR INDICATORS ON RCRDRS. (R91ARKSl 0780 PARASRAPH lt.ll'IBER: 6.5.4.1.B SUOOESTED BACl<FIT: ADD saus TO RECORDERS THAT CORRESPOND TO THE SCIUS PRINTED ON RECORDING PAPER. fff DISPOSITION: REPLACE TEXAS INSTRUMENT RCRDRS W/ RCRDRS THAT CAH BE READ ON REAL WE BASIS, S 0 OPS ~' T WAIT FOR READirES. DATA COLl.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJlmER: TP-5.l DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIV:lRKS: JP-16. PROB DESC: READINGS DELAYED 15 1mtJTES. IIDIS INVO.VED:
~AK NIJIBER LOCATl~ ~ ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII TISRAPH 1N ff t()T IN INV FILE i
HI.JIIIAN ENSINEERIN3 DISCREPANCY REPORT 93/17/86 SURRY !MIT 2 CODE C ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED f(J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Aa2581 DRU! CWNTER HAS IIORE T~ FOOR DIGITS AND IS f(JT 6RO.JPED. I -5 . 93/17/86 11M ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OP RESP!l'&. fff PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: DU COLMER ~ IIORE T~ FOUR DIGITS AND IS f(JT GRllJPED OR SEPARATED BY ACOIIIA, DECIMAL POINTOR ADDIT. SPACE 8780 PARAGRAPH NJIIIBER: 6.5.5.1.A.3 SUS6£STED BACt<F IT: 6RCXJP AND SEPARATE Tl£ DI6ITS Of Tl£ DNI COUNTER BY COll'tAS, DECIIIIAL POINTS OR ADDITI~ S PACES. fff DISPOSITION: DECIIIIA:.. POINTS ~ BEEN ADD'=.Jl TO BA BLENDER. OTHERS ARE WHOLE UNITS COUNTERS OR
- ARE r<<JT CRITICAL OR TIIIIE DEPENDENT. Ml l(;TION REQUIRED*
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND COD£ NUMBER: TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE*IRKS: JP-17 ITEfilS IN\JOL.VED: LOCATION CIJ,IPONENT NAME SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEl'I NIS (N34) H f(JT IN INV FILE t
l t<<.R ENHNEERIN6 DISCR8>AHCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW HED f¥J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82582 FOR HIGH CONTRAST, BLACI< rt>>ERALS ON IIUTE DRlM SURFACE IS RECCNE COllll..T 16/17/85 IUIAN ERIKJR: DELAY IN CJ> RESPIJEE. tH PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: lfiITE l'I.JEIR.S rM BLACK DRUM SURFOCE. 8780 PARAS~ tt>>IBER:
- 6. 5. 5.1.A.4 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT:
CH!NJE DRIJ9S COLNTERS TO BUO< NUIERfU ~ lfHTE BAO<SROUND SURFACE. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-coNTRAST IS SOOD, COLtHERS EASILY READ. 14...SO ~TED ON VERT PNLS & COVER ED W/ 9-ASS. !RE!IIARKS> DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE N..OOER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY R91ARKS: JP-18. DISP: LOSS Cf" COOTRAST DUE TO SOILING NOT APROll.EM. ITEMS INVa.W>:
~RK l'tJIIIJIER LOCATirM cc>>fl0f£NT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSIDI NIS (N34) H r<<lT IN INV FILE*
~ OOINEERIN6 DISCl!EPIM:Y REPORT 02/28/86
. SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW HED t() TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~ !LACK ,muc LINES ~VE INCONSISTENT IEANINGS. CIIIPLT 18/17/85 lUIAH ERROR:
INHIBITED LEARNING. ERROR IN IP RESPONSE. lff PROllEJI DESCRIPTION: BUD IHMIC LHES REPRESENT JIIJRE T~ ~ TYPE CF FLOW, 0700 PARAGRAPH NUl!BER:
- 6. 6. 6. 4. A. 1 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT:
REPlOCE BLACK l!IMIC LINES. USE TWO DIFFERENT LIi\£ cruJRS DISPOSITION: DEI.ETE-PN..S ARE WIDELY SEPARATED, OPS FAIIIILHH WITH l'IIl!IC l!EANirti. NO ACTI~ NEE OED* DATA a:uECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJMBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATI~ AIDS SURVEY
~RKS:
DS:-59 IT01S INVCI.IJED: IIARK 'tJIIIBER LOCATICJ4 COflPONENT NAfllE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H N'.IT IN I~V FILE
- ti.A ENBINEERIN6 DISCIIEPAtCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODEC ASSESSNENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al268J. ARROl£ADS t<<lT USED TO INDICATE ,mnc FLCM DIRECTIIJE. NOD III-9 81/38/86 IUIAN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPINiE. ll!ISINTERPRETATION Cf' ,muc. Ht PROll.81 DESCRIPTI~:
,mucs DO t{)T USE (DlSTit<<:TIVE) ARROlffADS TO INDICATE FLCM DIRECTI~
8788 PARAGRAPH Nl.lf!BER:
- 6. 6. 6. 4, B. 3 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:
ADD DlSTir<<:T ARIDffADS lfiERE r£CESSARY, Ht DISPOSITION: ADD ARROWHEADS AS RECCMIENDED, REFER TO PI-82 <2A1181l,
- DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIIBER:
TH.1 LABELS IWD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJIIARKS: DS-51 ITENS INVOLVED: MRK NJMBER LOCATION CCJmENT NAf£ SYST01 SUBSYSTEJII IIIIIICS H N'.IT IN INY FIL.£ t
ltJIAI ENiINEERitE DISCREPA'<<:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- HED t<<:I TITLE SURRY ~IT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSES9ENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22A82684 SOME MIMIC DESTINATICIH/TEIMitil. POINTS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED, ta/97/85 I
V, llJNAN ERROR:
~Y/ERROR IN CJ) REsm.sE.
fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTICIH: TI£RE ARE SIJE "IMIC DESTINATICIH/TERIIIItA. POINTS THAT ARE r<<JT LABELEl> OR DO t<<JT END AT LAB El.ED IDIPOENTS. 0710 PARAGRAPH ttJMBER: 6.6.6.4,B.S SU6GESTED BACKFIT: LABEL POINTS/TERIIIINATE POINTS AT LABELL£D co,JlOrENTS. fff DISPOSITION: IJEL£TE-(J)S ARE IELL AWARE THAT TERIIIINAL POINTS ARE CONTAINIENT ATMOSPHERE, N'.I AC TICIH NEEDED, DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION f'.WD CODE rf.Jll!BER: THl,l LABELS AND LOCATICIH AIDS SURVEY REfllARKS: DS-S2 ITEJIIS INVCl.VED:
~RK N!JflB£R LOCATION COlfll'.>>ENT NAflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM NIMICS H NH IN INV FILE
- tOIAN ENSINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22Al2685 LS IIIATRICES OF SHULAR COflPS DO NOT ~ LABELED COORDINATE AXES. COO.T 98/87/85 HJIAN ERROR:
DELAY IN LOCATIN6/REFEREtCIN6 A DISPLAY.
/
lff PR08L91 DESCRIPTION: LISTED DISPLAY fllATRICES DO ~T HAVE LABELED COORDINATE AXES FDR AID IN LOCATING A SIMil D ISR..AY. ~ IOARCATICl4 UN PARAGRAPH MJIIBER: 6.8.3.2.D.1 6.8.3.2.D;2 SUGGESTED BACKFIT: APPLY LABELED COORDINATE AXES TD /ti LARGE ~ T MATRICES lfiERE NECESSARY. lff DISPOSITION: DELETE-STATUS LISHTS lflVE BEEN LABELED SIICE IIIOSAIC PI-OTDS WERE TAKEN*
- DATA CtUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER:
TP-6.1 LABELS ~D LOCATION AIDS SURVEY R9IAR1<S: DS-53 ITEJIIS INW..YED: fllARK tt.lMBER LOCATION a:JfllPCWEHT NAIi£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEIII fllATRICES H ~T IN INV FILE
- tUIAH ENiINEERING DISCREPAAtY REPORT 83/20/86
- TITLE SURRY 22Al2905 llJDITDRY SIStA. EXCEEDS INTENSITY CF 91 DBIAl.
114IT 2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY NOD ASSESS!'IENT STATUS II -6 LAST REVIEW DATE 17/11/85 tUIAN ERROR: CAN CAUSE IRRITATION TD CP£RATI!J4S PERSDtfEL.
-.. PRDBL.al DESCRIPTION:
HI RN6 GASEOUS EFFLUENT RAD JO SIIHIL. INTENSITY IEASURED AT 94 DBIAl. 8700 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.2.2.6.C S006ESTED ~IT: ADJUST ALRJII TO UN'-IST~Y URT/SET DPS ATTENTION. 10DBCAl ABOVE AVG AMBIENT GaERALLY I AD£0ijlTE. BK6RND IRIV<l
- 1 I-ff DISPOSITION:
REFER TD PI-45 C28A02902l *
- DATA C(l.LECTICIN DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP- 2.1 COMJNICATIONS SURVEY REMRKS: C-10. BKFIT: ~BIENT SHrut.D NJT EXCEED 65DB!Al. IIDIS INVCl.VED: LOCATION CIJIIIPCWENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYST91 HI RN6 6S 11W I* NJT IN INV FILE f
II.A OOINEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86
- HED <<l Wle ~ ~
TITLE FOR UNITS srutl Ii.IKE. SURRY UNIT2 CODE A RESPaeIBILITY ENG ASSESSIENT STATUS II -5 . LAST REVIEW DATE 87/11/85 IUAI ERf<<JR: COIFUSION OVER lliICH SYSTEJII/CO!flO£NT Ii.ARM IS SOI.NDIN6 FOR. tH PROlll.EN DESCRIPTION:
~IATOR ll.ARf!S FOR UNITS; AUX VENT ALARflS AND HI RNS6AS£CNJS EFFLUENT RAD O 80.N> IU KE.
fJ7te PARAGRAPH IOIBER: 6,2,2,2,A SU66ESTED .BAO<FIT:
~ TONE If' Ii.ARM ENABLING EASY DIFFERENTIATION OF SOUNDS.
tH DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-85 (28Ai2106l DEi UL.ED Ar<<.t(;IATOR STUDY*
- DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION AN', CODE NUIIIBER:
TP-2.1 COMJNICATIONS SU* .Jt.Y REPIARKS: C-9 IIDIS IN\/Cl.VED: MARK NUMBER LOCATION CTJIIPCM IT NAPE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII
~ Ii.ARMS ff t(JT IN INV FILE*
AUX VNT Ii.RM ff tlr IN INV FILE 1 HI RN6 GAS£ ff r<<: IN INV FILE
- HUflll'.W EtEINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASS£SSMEN'T LAST REVIEW HED I'() TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2919 IIIPR(J)ER SETPOINT FOR iK.Afflll, IDPt.T 17/11/85 ttM ERROR:
ERROR IN (J) RESPONSE. Hf PRCIIU)I DESCRIPTICl4: URI!! SETPOINT FOR RIKC-1116 1710 PA~RAPH NJMBE:R:
- 6. 3, 1, 2, A. 2 SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: ., .
ENSURE ADIIIINISTRATIVE CONTROLS IN Pl.ACE AND PROC£DURES ARE FOL.LOWED Hf DISPOSITION: DEL.ETE-t()T CRDR RELATED, HEATH PHYSICS RESPONSIBILITY,
- DATA CCllECTI(W DESCRIPTICJ4 AND CODE UBER:
TP-3,1 ANNIJIICIATOR SYSTEJ!IS REVIEW REMARKS: HR-16. WRITTEN FRI)! L.ER-81-t14/i.'31--9. ITEMS INYCl.W>: NARK NI.MBER LOCATll:W COIPOrENT , - SYSTEJII SUBSYSTOI H r()T IN INV FILE f I
IUIAN EtEINEERINS D1SCR£PA.t£Y R£PORT W28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSfEHT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE Wl03e34 Ilil>RCPER ~TRCl. LOCATION I -2 V!f,/U/85 liA ERROR: INADVERTANT CPERATION. H+ PROBt.91 DESCRIPTION: OP OPERATED DRAIN INSTEAD OF FILL W - DRAIN W ON TOP R!M OF OORLS, FILL ()j BOTTOM. VIOL ATED OP EXPECTATI~ 17N PARAGRAPH tt.Jfl!BER: 6.8.2.2.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: CRITICAL FIKTION - RECOMEND DREIFE TO KEY-DP£R SWTCHOO t()T RECOll£ND CHA."EIFE CONTROL LOCATI~ ff+ DISPOSITION: REARRANGE SWS SO FILL ABOVE DRN WS. !WILL l!ATCH OP EXPECTATIONS, OPS WILL OOICK
- LY AM>T. l IfllPROVE umELINS.
DATA ct:UECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REl!ARKS: E-47. l£D WRITTEN FROI! LER REVIEW 81-03910.JL-l/9-3-81 IT9IS INYO.\JED: l!AIIK fOIBEA LOCATillil ctJIPOl£NT tfllE: SYSTBI SUBSYSTEM t£Y-1851A ff l'()T IN INV FILE t I-C\'-1851B ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t 1£V-1851C H l<<lT IN INV FILE t 1£V-1852A ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t 1£1/-18528 H l'()T IN INV FILE t t£1/-1852C ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t
ltM ENlINEERirE DISCREPAJ<<:Y REPORT 82/28/86
- HED t<<l TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22Al3l35 a>>lTRn. REQUIRES 61.JARDUE a>>IPLT if:,/17/85 IUIAN ERROR:
INADVERTANT ACTIVATION. 1+1 PROIUJII DESCRIPTIOO: COO'RO... WAS INADYERTANTLY ACTIVATED (SEE LERS 81-e57H~3t.--fl 19-22-81) .AND 81-0481831.--fl 17-2 7-81)) 8710 PARASRAPH NJfllBER: 6.4.1,2,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: INSTALL ~TRa ~RD I I fff DISPOSITION: DELETE- B ~ CONTROL WAS OPEtt:D LOCALLY. NOT WITHIN SCOPE IF CRDR. ERROR t<<lT lilADE BY CJlERATIONS PERSCHEL, DATA cou.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M>>IBER: TP-4.1 CONTRO..S SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND vil.IDATION REJIIARKS: E-46. liRITIEH FRI)! LER 81-048/031..--fl AND 81-t7/831..--fl IIDIS INYll.UED: MRK tOIBER L.OCATI~ COIPOENT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ll)V-2867B H f()T IN ItN FILE * . MJY-2867D H r<<lT IN INV FILE t
ttJIIW ENSINEERHE DlSCREPAl<<:Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY IJHT2 CODE A5SESSIEHT LAST REVlEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 221113836 CCWTRCk.S ON BErCHl300RDS OOTSIIE Tl£ REACH rnms. 86/16/85 K.R ERROR: lNABILITY TO RBOi NECESSARY COfTRtLS WITH EXCESSlVE EFFORT. j lff PRO!l.91 JESCRIPTION:
~TIKl.S LOCATED ClJTSID£ Tl£ EXTENDED FUfCTIOfA. RElOi IF THE 5TH )TILE FEIRE AND 95TH )T ILE IR.E.
9710 PARAGRAPH tOIBER: 6.1.2.2.0.2 6.1.2.2.c
- SU66ESTED BAO<FIT:
DETERMINE WHICH CONTRO..S AFFECT PUWT SAFETY AND RELOCATE TO ENSURE EASY ACCESS. lff DISPOSITION: DELETE: t() PRWNi£D £PERATI(J,j lS REOOIRED OOTSIDE OF Fut<<::Tlm<<. REACH OF FIFTH PERCENTILE FEJIIAI..E FOR ~TRCk.S LISTED, DATA CCUECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE rtlfl!BER: TP-1.2 ANTHROPOMETRICS SURVEY REJIIARKS: 1, 2-2. SEE WRlTTEN t£D FOR ITEMS W/OUT IIIARI< ftJIIIBERS. ITEMS INYa.\a>:
~RK fUIBER LOCATlON COIIPOtENT fM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 2-cN-P-lA AAB216 IETER COO>ENSATE SYSTEM 2-c:N-P-1B M'.:216 METER CCNlENSATE SYSTEM 2-cN-P-lC AM217 IETER CIMENSATE SYSTEM 2-CS-HA ~195 DISCRETE ROTARY aJfTAll'fENT SPRAY SYSTEM 2-CS-P-28 ~1e6 DlSCRETE ROTARY CCJffAINENT SPRAY SYSTEJII 2-CS-P-3 CAB1e5 DISCRETE ROTARY CllfTAiltENT SPRAY SYSTEM 2-FW-P-lAl AM212 ll!ETER FEEDWATER SYSTEM STEAfl SENERATORS 2-FW-P-1A2 AAB212 METER FEEDWATER SYSIDI STEAfl GENERATORS 2-RS-P-2A AAB108 PETER CONTAINENT RECIRCULATIN6 SPRAY SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD
- 2-RS-P-28 2-VP-P-JA AACI08 IETER DBA111 DISCRETE ROTARY
~TAift£NT RECIRCUI..ATI1'<<3 SPRAY SYSTEM VACWI PRIIIII"1i (WATER SID£> SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD
Et.6INEERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 02/28/86
~
SURRY LINIT2 tEl NO: 22A83136 IT01S INVCI.YED: MAK NJIIIBER LOCATif.ft C(N)(JEHT NA1E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 2"."YP-P-38 DBA1i3 DISCRETE ROTARY WKllJfl PRifllitfJ (WATER SIDE> SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD ACB-2512 CM.22 DISCRETE ROTARY SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD
~B-25B2 CW2.23 DISCRETE ROTARY SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD ACB-25C2 cr~4 DISCRETE ROTARY SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD N L£FT BD ~ ff NClT IN INV FILE t ANN LFT BD RSET ff NClT IN INV FILE 1 ANH RT BD ~ ff NClT IN INV FILE t ANN RT BD RESET ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 N RT BD TEST ff NOT IN INV FILE I AUT-STRT O P'i ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 C. L. S. ACT~T'4 f f NClT IN INV FILE t CLS RESET TR A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 Cl.S RESET TP B ff NClT IN INV FILE I CRT DISP CT'rll.. ff NClT IN INV FILE 1 CS-25-al2 DAA222 DISCRETE ROTARY CS-25-25B2 DAA223 DISCRETE ROTARY CS-25-25( *~ IlM224 DISCRETE ROTARY CS-25-62'42 DAB224 DISCRETE ROTARY
- CS-25-v:T557 DAA225 DISCRETE ROTARY DELTAT DEFEAT ff NClT IN INV FILE 1 FCV-2lee. RAA914 PROCESS CONTROU.ER CHEMI~ AND VCUJIE CONTROi. SYSTEM CHARGING FCV-2o85 BAA117 PROCESS COOR<LLER RESIDUAL tEAT REl<<ML SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FCV-~-28i!A BAA215 DISCRETE ROTARY AUXILIARY STEAM SYSTEfll ISCLATION VALVES FCV P-3-2188 BAB215 DISCRETE ROTARY AUXILIARY ST£AIII SYSTEM ISOUITION VALVES FC\ *SV-28i!A BAA216 CIRCUIT BREAKER fl!AIN STEAM SYSTEM IS(LATION VALVES FC\-SV-288B BAB216 DISCRETE ROTARY l'IAIN STEAi!! SYSTEM ISOLATION VAi.YES FI IE E,!F.,RSEl<<:Y f f r<<JT IN INV FILE t 6El'H1SDil HNOT IN INV FILE 1 SEN-tJ;DP H r<<JT IN INV FILE t HCV-2,42 DAA116 PROCESS ~TR<LLER RESIDUAL HEAT R9IOVll. SYST01 1£V-,:2NA CBA127 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct9Ir.AL AND VCl.lllE CONTRCl. SYSTEM ISCl.ATION Wt.VES tCV-!2818 .ceA128 DISCRETE ROTARY DEMir.AL AND VIX.UIE ~TRCl. SYSTEM ISClATION VALVES HCY*2280C CBA129 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct9Ir.AL AND VIX.LJIE CONTRGL. SYSTEM IS(LATION VI\.VES l(:V-2201 CBA123 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEJl!Ir.AL AND '.U..UIE COORCl. SYSTEM ISClATION VALVES 1£\1~1 CBA126 DISCRETE ROTARY 0£fl!lr.AL AN> VO.LJIE CONTRO.. SYSTEM ISCLATION VI\.VES ocv-23*1 CM123 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct£llllr.AL AND VILUIE COORCl. SYSTEM 1soum~ VALVES 1£V-221l CAA124 DISCRETE ROTARY D£111Ir.AL AND Vll.lJIE COO-RO.. SYSTEM ISCLATION VALVES 1£V-2' 44 CM125 DISCRETE ROTARY D£1lll~ AND VOLUIE COORCl. SYSTEM ISCl.ATI~ VALYES HCY-f:556A H NClT IN INV FILE t ICY- ~'55&8 CAA126 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct9Ir.AL AND VCUJIE CONTRll. SYSTEM ISCLATION VI\.VES HCV* 2556C CAA127 DISCREiE ROTARY CH01Ir.AL AND VIX.UIE ~TRCl. SYSTEM InATION VALVES IC\-~7A CBA124 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct£ll!ICAI.. AND VCl.lJE CONTRO.. SYSTEM ISOJ!TION Wt.VES HCV-2557B CBA125 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEMICAL AND VOUJIE. ~TRCl. SYSTEM ISClATION VALVES
- 1£Y-2".57C CBB125 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEMICAL AND VCl.lJIE CONTRCl. SYSTEM ISCLATION VI\.VES HCV-2/58 DAA115 PROCESS aJffRCl.LER RESIIXR. HEAT R9IOVIL SYSTBI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD
. 1£Y-'i5-2M CAB213 PROCESS CONTROLLER IIV!IN STEAM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD HI S'OI FLO TR A HNOT IN INV FILE 1
ti.MN EHSINEERINS DISCREPAi'CY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 l£D r() I 22A8J836 ITEMS INV!l.YED:
!!ARK IUEER LOCATION C()IP(JENT , - SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII HI STM FLO TR B ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ t HIC-CV-218 DAA114 PROCESS CIJHRCUER ~TAINENT VACUlJII SYSTBI INT Rti6 TRP TRA ff t()T IN INV FIL£ t INT RfE TRP TRB ff NOT IN INV FIL£*
U:V-2461A CAA128 DISCRETE ROTARY Cle!ICR.. ~ VOllJE: CONTIHl. SYSTEJII ISCLATIOH WI.YES LCV-2468B CAA129 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEMI~ ~ VClUIE ~TIHl. SYSTEM ISll.ATI~. VALVES LO PRZR PR TR A ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ t LO TAVG TR A f f NOT IN INV FILE* LO TAV6 TR B ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t LVL SI ACT TR A HNOT IN INV FILE* 111(-\.P IIKlD£ CTRL ff NOT IN INV FIL£+ IIOJ 2842 ff NOT IN INV FIL£*
,OV 2867 A ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ t IIIOV 2867 B ff NOT IN INV FILE*
111V 2B67 C ff NOT IN INV FIL£ f l<<lV 2867 D ff NOT IN INV FILE* lllV 2B69 A ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£*
- l<<lV 2869 B ff NOT IN'INV FILE*
ll'.IV-2585 DAA118 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR COil.ANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS ISOLATION VALVES l<<lV-2586 DAB118 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR coa.ANT !PRIMARY LCXJP, PWRl SYS ISOLATI ~ VALVES
,OV-2587 DAA119 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR coo.ANT CPRil!ARY LOOP, PWRl SYS ISOLATION WI.YES flEY-2598 CAA118 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR COOUfH <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR) SYS ISOLATI ~ VALVES IIJY--2592 SAB118 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR COCLANT (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS ISOLATION VALVES fl!OV-2594 CAA119 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR COOLANT (PRil'IARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYST91 FIRST RECORD ,OV-CS-201A ff NOT IN INV FILE t MOV-CS-2t1B DAA1"9 DISCRETE ROTARY ~TAifflENT SPRAY SYSTEII fOV-CS-201C ff MJT IN INV FILE t l<<lV-CS-2010 DAA110 DISCRETE ROTARY ~TAINIENT SPRAY SYSTBI ,OV-CS-202-B CAA107 DISCRETE ROTARY CONTAINIENT SPRAY SYSTEM l<<lV-cs-202A ff hOT IN INV FILE*
KIV-FW-258A CM:!14 DISCRETE ROTARY FE.EDWATER SYSTEJII ISll.ATIOH WI.YES l<<lV-FW-2508 CAB214 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISOLATI~ YALYES IIJV-FW-2:51A CAA216 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISOLATIIJI WI.YES fOV-FW-251 B DM216 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEIII ISOLATI ~ VALVES fOV-FW-2:SlC CAB215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISOLATIOH Wl.VES KlV-FW-251D DAB215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTE/4 ISll.ATI~ VALUES lllV-FW-2:51E CAA215 DISCRETE ROTARY FE.EDWATER SYSTEM ISWITIIJI WI.YES KlV-FW-251F DAA215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEJII ISll.ATI~ VALVES lllV-fW-254A DAA212 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISOLATI~ Wl.VES l<<)V-FW-254B DAB212 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEJII ISOLATI ~ VALYES l()V-fw-2:54C DAA213 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEJII ISOLATIIJI WI.YES IIIOV-RS-256A ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff MJT IN INV FILE t fOV-RS-2:SGB
"'1V-SW-284A DAA111 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTBI fOV-SW-204B DAB111 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM l!IOV-SW-264C DAA112 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTBI *,ov-sw-2040 BM113 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM
,. HED NO: 22A83836
~
SURRY EtEINEERIN3 DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT UNIT2 02/28/86 ITEJIIS IfMl.YED: IIARK ttJIIIBER UJCATICJI COIPONEHT NAf!E SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM IIIV-~26 r.AA111 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEJII IIJIJ-~2158 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 IIIV-SW-28SC CM112 DISCRETE ROTARY , SERVICE WATER SYSIDI IIJIJ-5W-285[) CM113 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEII lllY-sw-ce6A DBB111 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM
~~2968 DBA112 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEJII OCB-{;282 CAB224 DISCRETE ROTARY OCB-62TS57 CAA225 *ll!ETER PCV-2455A DAA121 PROCESS COHTROlLER REACTOR coo.ANT (PRIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS PCV-24SSB DAA122 PROCESS ~TROLLER REACTOR axLANT (PRIMARY LCKJ), PWR> SYS PCV-CV-201B ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PCV-SV-20IA ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PRZR NSTR PRESS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 PRZR SEL SWITCH ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 PW RN6 TRIP TRA ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PW RN3 TRIP TRB ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RBl:TOR TRIP ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RMT REFUEL ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
- RTM SYS TR A AV-NS-201A RV-f!S-211B AV-fl!S-201C RX TRIP, RESET SI ACT~TION ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 CM211 PROCESS CONTROlLER fllAIN.STEAfl SYSTEJll CAA212 PROCESS ~TROLLER ~IN STE~ SYSTEM CAB212 PROCESS CONTRCUER fllAIN STEAfl SYSTEM ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ATIIOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVES ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVES ATIIJSPHERIC RELIEF VALVES SI RESET TR A ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SI RESET, TR B ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-2NA1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 S0Y-RC-200A2 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-200Bl ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-20082 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 S0V-RC-201Al . ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 S0V-RC-201A2 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-201Bl ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-20182 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE*
SR TRIP TRA ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SR TRIP TRB f f NOT IN INV FILE* I TAVE DEFEAT ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TESTANI LFT BD f f NOT IN INV FILE* TR ARESET ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TR B LO PRZR PR f f NOT IN INV FILE 1 TR B LYL SI ACT ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TR B RESET f f r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TURB-DC ECP ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-DA203B DBA102 DISCRETE ROTARY DRAINS (AERATED> SYSTEM TV-6W-211A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-GW-211B f f NOT IN INV FILE* TV-GW-212A ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1
~ EttiINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- SURRY UNIT2 l£D I'(): 22A83836 ITEMS INYll.YED:
,w:i~ N.MBER LOCATI~ COf!PClfENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 1V-GW-212B ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 1V-fllS-2elA DAA210 DISCRETE ROTARY flW:\IN STEAi'! SYSTEM 1V-fllS-2elB DAB210 DISCRETE ROTARY l!!AIN STEAIII SYSTEJII 1V-fllS-2elC DAA211 DISCRETE ROTARY l'.AIN STEAM SYSTEM
OOINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT HlM e2/2S/86
.SURRY l.tHT2 CODE A ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A13137 CCMROLS WITHIN 3 ItOIES Cf FRONT EDGE Cf CCMnE, ENS II -5 87/11/85
~ ERROR:
la:IDENTll. ~TIYATI!li OF CONTROLS. lff PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: COO'Rll.S ARE WITHIN 3" Of FR!liT EDGE IF CONSOlf. 07~ PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.1. 2. 2. D.1 SLESESTED BACKFIT: ATTACH. 61.JARDRAIL AROOND BB, INSTIU GUARDS OR PROVIDE INTERLOCKS. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-56 (20Ai3007l. INSTALL A GUARD RAIL*
- DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-1.2 ANTHRCPMTRICS SURVEY REJIIARKS: 1.2-1 ITEJIIS INVCl.YED :
~RK NUflBER LOCATION roilPClfENT t9IE SYSTEfil SUBSYSTEJII 2-SH>-leA 14IB125 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM ~RSIN6 2-SW-P-198 lflA126 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM CHARGINS IOY-cP-20@ ~11 DISCRETE ROTARY 51.JBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD l<<M.CV-2115B ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t KIVL.CV-21 lSD ff NOT IN INV FILE t l!KlYLCV-211 SE ff NOT IN Il'lv FILE 1 S0Y-SI-282A2 ff NOT IN Il'lv FILE t SOY-SI-28282 HNOT IN INV FILE*
EN6IN£ERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT Ht.WIN 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE C ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A93838 C(J(TRCJ.S ON VERT BOARD OOTSIDE ~.INIU AND IIIAXIMUM VIEWitE HEI6HTS EN6 III-8 V/6/97/85 ttMH ERROf<: DELAY IN CPERATOR RESPONSE.
"* PROIIL9I ~SCRIPTI~:
CTRLS ARE LOER THAN l'IIN RECOVENDED t£I6HT !34") 0700 r.iARAG~ NIJl!BER: 6, 1, 2. 5. A SW .iESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE COOTROLS TO BE WITHIN RECOfflllENDED RAIG OF 34" AND 70" ABOVE FLOOR.
- JISPOSITION:
NRV-f11S-211A1B/C, PICJS r()N RETURN WS - RELOCATE lP ON BOARD. COORDINATE WITH PI-6 H!~l* DATA COLI.£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M..11&:R: TP-1.2 ANTHRIJOETRICS SURVEY R91ARKS: 1,2-3 I IDIS Il'Ml.i.e: JIIARK IOIBER LOCATION COPIPOrENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII NRV-""5-201A ff MJT IN INV FILE* NRV-f11S-2l1B ff NOT IN INV FILE* NRV-fllS-201C ff NOT IN INV FILE*
tlWW EN61NE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT 02/28/86
- HED 22A83M8 t(J TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE KEY SWITCH VERTICSl. POSITION OOES NOT INDICATE CFF OR SAFE.
RESPONSIBILITY ASSE:SSIENT STATUS COO.T LAST REVIEW DATE 16/16/85 HJA( ERROR: INCORRECT SWITCH ORIENTATION OR VALi£ JIIA\' RESll.T. fff PRO!L9I DESCRIPTION: KEY-a>ERATED LOCKS ARE NOT ORIENTED SO T~T THE SWITCH IS !FF OR SAFE lffN THE KEY IS IN T~ VERTICSl. POSITID't. 17i0 PAROORAPH N..JPIBER:
- 6. 4. 4. 3 SUGGESTED BACl<F IT:
RE-ORIENT SWITCHES SO THAT OFF OR SAfE IS VERTICAL, PROVIDE LABEL TO INDICATE CORRECT KEY SWITCH POSITION, 144 DISPOSITION: ll.L ITEMS W/ POSTNS r()T Cl.EARL\' IIIAR1<£D ADDRESSED IN VD15!23A03211l. ITEMS LISTED
-DELETE-POSTNS CLEARLY l'IARKED*
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE NUMBER:
- TP-4. 1 ~TROLS SURVEY REIIIARl<S:
- 4. l-1, 0700 8DL£ SH!llD READ:6. 4. 4. 3D !BOTH SWS ON EHC TURB>
IIDIS INVCl.~: IIIARI< ttJIIIBER LOCATION COOJENT , - SYSTEM SUBS\'ST01 IIIAINT TEST ff r()T IN INV FILE t OVSPO PROT ff t<<lT IN INV FILE*
tiJIAN OOINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE A ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
.22AIJ841 r<<l INDICATI~ CF ACTI.Jl'.l. Vil.VE POSITIIJE. II -5 @6/07/85 tUIAN ERROR:
"ISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAY INFO, EQUIPl'IENT STATUS.
Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTION:
~TUAL VALVE POSITIONS ARE r()T INDICATED. ~TlA. INDICATIONS IO.LD PREVENT ALOT CF TRIPS.
0700 PARAGRAPH NI.Ml£R: 6.5.1.1.E.2 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE INDICATION IF ACTUAL ~VE STATUS. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-108 (20801184, 1106, 101871
- DATA ro.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJl!ARKS: P.9.2-:-13 ' ITEMS INYll.VED: MRK NUMBER LOCATION CCJflONEkT NAf£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FL EVAP PR H r<<JT IN INV FILE t FW BYP WS HNOT IN ItN FILE t fW FD SYS H r()T IN ItN FILE t PRZR SPRA W HNOT IN ItN FILE t S6 BYP WS HNOT IN INV FILE t
DISCREPANCY HlJWW EIEINE£RIN6 REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al385i AR!Oi!S ~ PUSHBUTI!lE ~ BEEN RUBBED OFF. NOD II -7 07/11/85 tUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. 1H PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: ARRM ~ SOIE PUSHBUTIONS ~ .B£EN RUBBED CH lfiICH REDlCES CERTAINTY OF SEL£CTIN6 CORRE CT SWITCH DIRECTION, 0780 PARAS~ NU"8ER: 6.4.4.4 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: REPLAC£ PBS WITH ONES THAT HAVE ARROWS CLEARLY DEFINED OR REPAINT ARROWS ON CURRENT BUTION s. fH DISPOSITION: REPLll BUTIONS ON IU SUDi COIIIPONtNTS AS REllUIRED. ACCOO..ISH IN CONJI.Jt£TION W/ MODIFICATIONS IN C-12 ( ~ 9 DATA COL.LECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE IUIBER: TP-4.1 ~ROLS SURVEY
~RKS:
C-15, 10700 6UIDEL1t-£ StfilD READ: 644-4Bl ITEMS INVOL.VED:
~RK ruBER LOCATION COIIIPOt£NT NAI£ SYSTE/11 SUBSYSTEJII FCV 111AN CTRL ff NlT IN INV FILE
- It.DIAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT ec!/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODEC ASSESSIENT ~T REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22AIJa54 ~TR!ll ~ VERT BOARD WTSIDE IIIINIU AND JIIAXIIIUI VIEWING 1£I9ffS NOD III-8 ~/17/85 H.JlllN ERROR:
DELAY IN IP RESPONSE. fff PROBt.al DESCRIPTI~: CTILS ARE HIIHR Tt91 JIIAX RECCMNDED 1£16HT OF 78* <FIOI FLOOR). a1ae PARAGRAPH NI.JIIIBER: 6.1.2.5.A SU36ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CONTROLS TO BE WITHIN RECOflll'IENDED RArEE OF 34" AND 70 1 ABOVE FLOOR. fff DISPOSITION: STEP LADDER HAS BEEN PROVIDED*
- DATA ClllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP-1.2 ANTHRCJPOIIIETRICS SURVEY REJ!IARKS: 1.2-3 ITEMS INVCLVED: JIIARK 101B£R UJCATI~ mlPIHNT NAfE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII PRZR SFTY W ff r<<JT IN INV FILE
- TR A ff t<<lT IN INV FILE
- tt.ww EtfiINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESS,1£NT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY . STATUS DATE 22A83864 aMID.S ~ VERT DIRD ll.JTSIDE IUNIIUI AND IIAXIO VIEWitE HEIGHTS CQllllt.T 87/15/85 11.R Ef:AOR:
DEl AY IN !P RESPONSE. 1+1 PRDBl:.:fll DESCRIPTI~: f,TRL.S ARE LllER THAN ,iIN RECDIENDED t£I6HT (34 8
).
87'.t PARA61ti¥lti NIJ!BER: 6.1.2.5.A Ft.166ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CONTROLS TD BE WITHIN RECflllllENDED RA& OF 34" AND 78" ABOVE FLOOR. fff DISPOSITION: CTRLS ARE FOLH) TO BE WITHIN RECOMENDD RAf\EE/BEitE RElllVED F~ CR/NOT FREOOEN
- TLY USE. t<<l ACTION.
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIBER: TP-1.2 ANTHRIJICJIETRICS SURVEY REJIIARKS:
- 1. 2-313)
I1DS INVCl.i.tD: flARK NUfllBER t.OCATIIJ4 IDIPONENT NA,£ SYST01 SUBSYSTEM fCY-CC-213A LM489 DISCRETE ROTARY t£UTl!Ot SHIELD TAN< AND COO.INS SYSTEl4 FCV-CC-2138 UABm DISCRETE ROTAR, NEUTROO SHIELD TANK AND COO.INS SYSTBI FCV-ES-215 f f r()T IN INV :=ILE
- FCV-ES-2t7A ff NOT IN INY FILE*
FCV-£S-208A HNOT IN IN' FILE*
~-2267~ ff NOT IN I~J FILE*
ll!CIY-2267-B .H r()T IN I N FILE *
~-2269~ H NOT IN l N FILE t l(JV-2269-B HNOT IN .NY FILE*
.
- t'IOV-2278~ f f NOT IN NV FILE t
- . l'IOV-2270-B H NOT Ir-.t >N FILE t
HU~ El\6IN££RING D1SCR£PAt£Y REPOflT ~/28/86 SURRY UN!T2 HED NO: 22A93864 IT01S INYCl.VED: IIIARK N.IMBER LOCATION COP1PONENT NAI£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM l()V-2275-A ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 IIIOV-2275-B ff NOT IN IN\/ FILE 1 i KIV-2275-C ff NOT IN INV FILE* lllV-ES-2'0 ff t(IT IN IN\/ FILE 1 IIJHS-22 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 l()V-ES-58 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 l()IJ-£9-67 ff t<<JT IN IN\/ FILE 1 JIIOV-ES-85 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 l()V-ES-95 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SV-202 ff NOT IN. INV FILE 1 TV-SV-203 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A03e65 ~TROLS NEEDED IN Tl£ CR. NONE COO.T 07/15/85
~ ERROR:
IIISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED INFO. FAIWRE TO DETECT ABMJR M. ~ITI~. Kl PROa..91 DESCRIPTION: CONTROLS LISTED NEEDED IN CR. 8700 PARAGRAPH NUfllBER: f>, l, 1, 1,A SUGGESTED .BACKF IT: PROVIDE CONTROLS NEEDED BY OPS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER PI-77 (20A02005l. NOTE: CTRL SW FOR FW RECIRC WS IS REFERRED TO PH03 12
~3061)
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUfllBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~RKS:
P.9.2-1 ITEJIIS INYll.YED: -
!ARK MJMBER LOCATION CCJMPOtefl ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CR 0l£R VENT ff NOT IN IN\J FILE 1 FW RECIRC W ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 l!l)Y SHI TR V ff NOT IN INV FILE t
HUriAN E~INEERil\6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT 02/28/86
- HED t<<:I TITLE SURRY ~IT2 CODE RESPONSIBH.ITY ASS£SS!'E.~T STATUS LAST R£YlEW DATE 22Ai3866 ~TROLS NEEDED IN CR TO BRING PUlNT TO su:E SHUTDClilN. NONE COMPLT 07/15/85 11M ERROR:
IIIISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED INFORIIIATION. FAILURE TO DETEC T ABNl!M.. CONDITIOO. fff PROaal DESCRIPTION: CPS REPORTED CONTROLS LISTED ARE NEEDED IN CR TO BRUE MT TO ASAFE SHUTDO.w CONDITION. 071N PARAGRAPH NUIIIBER: 6.1, 1, 1.A SU36ESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE CONTROLS r£EDED BY OPS. fff DISPOSITION: SEE PI-77 (20A02005>. MJTE: REFER TO PI-103 (2~1202) FOR CROSS CONN::CT FOR CTM T & IA SYSTEIIS* DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIIBER: TP-9,2 IJERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS: P.9.2-3 ITOO INV0..i.£Ih
!'.ARK tUIBER LOCATION COPIPOt£NT ~ SYSTE/11 SUBSYSTEl4 CRS ~ Clll ff r<<JT IN INV FILE -t M STM Lit£ ff NOT IN INV FILE t STM !Sil. ff NlT IN INV FILE -t TURB DRV ~ ff NOT IN INV FILE t
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPCRT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSl'!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai3191 It<<:OOISTENT OPEN AND .CLOSE POSITI~ LABELS ON PROCESS CONTROLLERS ENS II -6 07/11/85 IUIAH ERROR: NISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAY 1'*0, EOOIPIIENT STATUS, fff PROILal DESCRIPTION: TENP LABLS INDIC OPEN/CLOSE AT 0/1~ BASED ON lilW INSTRFAILS. OPEN/CLOSE "13T CONSISTENT A T 011*, cort=USING. 1790 PARAGRAPH tuBER: 6.5.1,1,E,2
!Ui6ESTED BACl<F IT:
PROVIDE PERMANENT LABas THAT ADEQUATELY DESCRIBE THAT THE VALUES ARE BASED ON INSTRUl'IENT FAILURES. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABEL!Ni STUDY PER Pl-82 (20A01101l *
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ NUMBER:
TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE!flRKS: P..9,2-H ITEJIIS ItMl.lJED:
~AK IUEER LOCATION CClflPOt£NT NAIii£ SYST£l'II SUBSYSTEM PROCE:SS CONT ff t()T IN INV FILE t I
HIJ'1AN EN6INERI1f3 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNI T2 CODE C ASS£SSPENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A03283 KNOB POINTER NOT CLOSE TO CORRESPOOJING SCf-A.ES, PARIUAX POSSIBLE, NOD III-9 06/07/85 ttJ!IIAN ERROR: ERROR IN OPERATOR R£SP0NS£.
"* PROll.91 DESCRIPTION:
KNOB POINTER t<<JT l(JlMED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PANELSCALES TO WHICH THEY POINT. PARRAL LAX MAY OCCUR. 0700 PARAGRAPH MJJIIBER: 6.4.4.5.D.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: USE A POINTER ON THE C,NTROL WHICH IS CLOSE TO THE SCAL£TO WHICH IT POINTS.
"* DISPOSITION:
POS WHICH f il USES SW !DIRECTLY IN FRONT), NO PROB W/ PARALLAX. OPS FAPIILIAR W/ S W, REPORT (] PRO!ll91. NO ACTION* DATA C0LL£CiI0N lltSCRIPTION ~ CODE M.JP!BER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY R91AR'.S: 1 .1-2* IT96 INV0-1.iED: MARK tUIR .R LOCATION COMPOt,ENT NAIE SYSTE/11 SUBSYSTEM 1/TJll-408 FAB289 DISCRETE ROTARY EL£CT~YDRAULICS CONTROLS SYSTEM
HOOlN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED Ml TITLE SURRY UNIT2 COD£ A RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSAENT STATUS
- .AST REVIEW DATE 22A832t6 LACK IF FEEDBAO< INDICATil'E PROCESS/DIRECTION OF PARiVETERCHANGE. ENG I -1 07 /1.1/85 tUIAN ERROR:
D£1.AY/ERROR IN IP RESPOEE. fff PROIUJI DESCRIPTION: TIIE LAS BET CTRL. ACTIVATION & l1.TI~TE SYS STATE & I'() IIIIAED FEEDBACK INDICATINS PROCESS & t DIRECT IF PARAIII DNx 8788 PARAGRAPH NU"8ER:
- 6. 9.3.1. c. 2*
SU66ESTED BACKFIT: EN6INEERIN6 EVALUATION TO IMPL£111ENT SO,i£ IMi.EDIATE FEEDBACK TO OPERATOR.
*** DISPOSITION:
REFER TO PI-77-59 (20A02045l *
- DATA IXUECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ NINER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RalARKS: c-20-1 ITBIS INYll.VED: fARK rtlflBER LOCATION COlflONENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSIDI PCY-2455A IIAA121 PROCESS CONTROLLER REACTOR COil.ANT (PRil'IARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PCY-24558 IIAA122 PROCESS CONTRCl.1.ER REACTOR COOU~H (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS
HUl".AN EN6INEERI/'c6 DISCREPANCY REPORT ~/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSP!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSiBILITY STATUS DATE 22A032e7 KEYS W/ SltaE FIOW Of TEETH DO NOT POINT UP OR FORWARD. NONE II -7 01/3"/86 11M ERROR: DELAY IN IJ> RESPONSE. I fff PR1lBt.£111 DESCRIPTION:
~L SiraE ROW KEYS ~KEY OPERATED CTRLSJ DO f()T POINT UPOR FORWARD. KEY IS INSERTED WITH T EETH POINTING 00,jN, 0700 PARAGRAPH tt!MBER:
Ei.4.4.3 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: RE-ORIENT t<EY-DPERATED CONTROLS TO ACCEPT KEYS WITH SIN6LE ROW Of' TEETH POINTING UP OR FOR WARD. fff DISPOSITION: KEY IJ>ERATED SWITCHES ARE NOT THIE CRITICAL AND CANNOT BE: INSERTED INCORRECTLY. NO OCTI~ REQUIRED, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.JIIIBER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY
~RKS:
C-21. (0700 6UID8.INE SHLllD READ: 6443B) ITENS INVCL VED:
~RK NlJIIIBER LOCATION COfllPONENT NAIIIE SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEJ!I SNli. ROW KEY HNOT IN INV FIL.£*
HUP!AN EN6IN£ERI1'6 DISCR£PANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED f(} TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~ cnmn. POSITIO'e ON KEY-<JPERATED CCNTRG..S ARE f(}T LABELLED. NOD II -6 07/11/85 tlWlN ERROR:
DELAY /ERROR IN OP£RATOR RESP(NjE. t+t PROIUJII DESCRIPTI~: CONTRCX.. POSITIONS AR£ DIFFICll.T TO DETERMINE lffN KEY ISREMOVED. 0700 PARAGRAPH ~BER: 6.4.4.3 SLGGESTED BACKFIT: PtRJI.AfaTLY LABEL crnlPONENT ABOVE POSITIONS RAtiTER THAN BEL~. tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO VD-15-1 (23A83210) *
- DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY
~ CODE NUMBER:
Ra!ARKS: C-22. (0700 SUI DELINE SHO.LD READ: 6. 4. 4. 3F > IIDIS INVCl.lJED: - fllARK N.JfllER LOCATION COMPOtENT NAIIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM t<EY CP CTRI..S ff f(}T IN INV FILE +
iUIAN ENSINEERIM3 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A8321S 1'1RROR IMA6ED Cllll9ENTS. ENG II -7 07ill/85
~ ERROR:
SELECTINi WRCN3 CONTROL. INCREASED SEARCH THIE. Hf PROl:ll.BI DESCRIPTION: Tl-£ LISTED CONTROLS ARE IIIRROR IPIASED WITHIN EACH LISTED SRCU>. 17e0 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.8.2.3.B Sl66ESTED BACKFIT: SWTICH LOCS OF 1-YS-f'-42/41 OR LOCS (f' 2-VS-f'-41/42. SWITCH LOCS OF 1-YS-f'-104B/A OR LOCS OF 2-YS-184A/B, fff DISPOSITI()t: REFER TO PI-19 (22f23@26) !VENT PNL) AND PI-117-3 (20003e16J,
- DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTill'i AND CODE NlJIIIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATION TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-28 IIDIS INYCl.lJED:
~RK N.Jfll£R LOCATION COIPOHENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII 1-YS-llMA WAB046 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEIII 1-YS-1148 WAAe46 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATI~ SYSTEM 1-YS-f'-41 XMM& DISCRETE ROTARY*. VENTILATION SYSTEf!I l-YS-f'-42 XABl45 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATIO'i SYSTEM 2-VS-114A WAA047 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEf!I 2-VS-114B. WMl48 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATI~ SYSTEM 2-YS-f'-41 XAAi47 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEJII 2-VS-f'-42 XAAl48 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATI~ SYSTEJII
liJ~ ENSINEERI"6 DISCREPANCY REilORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSJIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A83216 LACI( OF FEEDBACK INDICAT".l-3 PROCESS/DIRECTION OF PARA.IIETER ClilNGE. ENG II -6 07/11/85 tU!AN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN OP RES:-JQNSE. Hi PRO!l.9! DESCRIPTION: WE LAS BET CTR!. i:t:TIYATION & LL TIIIIATE SYS STATE I Ml !MED FEEDBACK INDICATING PROCESS & DIRECT OF PA~ D.HGE 071le PARAS~ NUJIBER: 6.9.3.1.C SU66ESTED BACKi 1T: EHSINEERINt; EVALUATION TO IJIIPLEl'IENT SOPIE IflfflEDIATE FEEDBACK TO OPERATOR. Hi DISPOSITION: REFER T'J PI-77-!1-S6l (20A02005l
- DATA COUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl.JIIIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMhRl{S: C-..20-2 IT91S IN' /Cl.VED: IIARK N!.f !1£R
- LOCATION COfllPONENT ~ SYSTEM SIJBSYSTEPI ff NlT IN INV FILE t
/
*HlJPIAN EN6INEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A03217 LID< CF FEEDBACK INDICATIN6 PROCESS/DIRECTION OF PARAMETER CHANGE, ENG I -5 07/11/85 ttJIIIAN ERROR:
DELAY/ERROR IN OP RESPONSE. Ht PROll.Efil DESCRIPTION: TIIE LAS BET CTRL OCTIVATIDN & ll.TI~TE SYS STATE & r() !IVIED FEEDBACK INDICATING PROCESS & DIRECT CF PARAI!! ~ 8718 PARAGRAPH NUIIIBER: 6.9.3,1.C SU66ESTED BACKf'IT:
- EN6INEERIN6 EViK..UATION TO ll'IPLEJIIENT srnE Il'IIEDIATE FEEDBACK TO OPERATOR, Ht DISPOSITION:
REFER TO PI-n-57 (20A02043l,
- DATA Cll.J.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIBER:
TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION R91ARKS: C-20-3 ITEJIIS INIJ[l.VEDi IARK NJIIIBER LOCATIOH CCJllilOt£NT , - SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII t£V-155A ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 HCV-1558 ff t{IT IN INV FILE 1 t£V-l55C ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1
~ ENGINEERINB DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE C ASSESSP1£NT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A83483 IESSA6ES ~ PUSHllJTTON CONTAIN IIORE T~ 3 LINERS OF LETTERING. ENG IIl-9 01/30/86 It.A ERROR:
DEUIY IN OP RESP<IEE. fff PR011t.91 llSCRIPTION: IE~ ON LEGEND PUSHBUTIONS CONTAIN l()RE THAN 3 LINES If' LETTERINB. 0709 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER:
- 6. 4. 3. 3. s. 5 Sl.66ESTED BAO{FlT:
THREE LINES OF LETIERIN6 OR LESS SHOULD BE USED TO IDENTIFY .BUTTON. fff DISPOSITION: CRT CTRL PB IN LABELIN6 STUDY (20A0110ll. UPPER EHC TURB PNL BEIN6 REMOVED (29A0
- 3845). ABBREV: "OVSP PROT CNTRL 1 DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUJIIBER:
TP-4,1 CONTROLS SURVEY REMRKS: 4.1-4. REDUCE ALL IESSA6£S TO 3 LIIES OR LESS. IIDIS INIJClYED: MRK fUIBER LOCATION COlflllfENT rf:lNE SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEJII H ~T IN INV FILE 1
H.JA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE C ASSESSIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ae3404 LESEND PUSHBUTTONS NOT READABLE UNDER ANY ILLlJIIIINATION COO>ITIONS. ENG III-9 V/6/07/85 It.A ERROR: ERROR IN (PERATOR RESPONSE. / tff PROBt..91 DESCRIPTION: LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS t()T READABl£ lM!E:R ~IENT LIGHT CONDITIONS, WITH OR WITHWT INTERfA. I LLUIIINATION. 8780 PARAGRAPH IUIBER:
- 6. 4. 3. 3. B, 1 SU66ESTED BACl<F IT:
INCREASE THE READABILITY OF LESEND PBS UNDER ALL ILLUPIINATION CONDITIONS, tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-60-4 120Ae3045l EHC PANEL UPPER SECTION TO BE RE~ *
- DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY REMARKS: 4.1-5 IIDIS INVO.. VED: IIARI< fOIBER LOCATION CCJlllONENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTE/JI LESEND PBS ff tt'.IT IN INV FILE t
ttJP!AN EMJINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODEC ASSESSJIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al3489 HIQi RESISTAta PUSHBUTTONS ENS III-9 07/11/85 tUIAN ERROR:
~WE.Y REsro&: - OP IIII6HT NOT FlJLLY DEPRESS PUSHBUTTONS.
1H PROllEN IESCRIPTI~: PBS~ CR SIIUATOR PIEASURED RESISTAra OF 6.5 LBS EXCEEDitE 48 WfCE flAX RESISTAra RECOR MENDED FOR OPERATION. 1780 PARASRAPH tUBER: 6.4.3.2,D SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: RECOIIIIEND REPLACIN3 PUSHBUTTONS IF PROBLEM EXISTS FOR TURBINE TRIP PUSHBUTTONS ON UNIT-2. fff DISPOSITION: SEE PI-60-3 (28Ai3045) TURBINE TRIP PUSHBUTTONS BEIN3 R£PLACED AS PART OF EHC TU
- RBirE coon Pll£L CHANGE OOT*
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUIBE:R: TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY REflARKS: DS-13 IIDIS INYCl.lJED: - flARK rtJflSER LOCATI~ CQIIIIONENT NAfE SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEM TURBINE TRIP H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
t(JPIAN ENiINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSPIENT LAST REVIEW HED ND TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE
~418 LIT COND CF LEGEND PBS NOT RECOONIZAa..E UNDER HIGHEST Al'IBIENT LISH I -S 07/11/85
~ ERROR:
~ y/ERROR IN a> RESPONSE.
tff PR08LEIII DESCRIPTION: ILWIINATED CONDITION OF LESENED PUSHllJTTONS IS t<<JT RECOONIZABLE LINDER HIGHEST PREDICTABLE ANBIENT LIGHTING COM> 07N PARAGRAPH rtJPIBER: 6.~.3.3.B.2 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: REPLACE PRESENT BULBS IN PBS WITH ONES OF HISHER WATTAGE tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO VD-5 (23801208) AND E-31 <20A02389l,
- DATA Sl:l.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NU!'IBER:
TP-4.1 CONTR1l.S SURVEY rE!ARKS: C-13. IT1£SE PBS ARE LOCATED ON THE TURBINE: MODE) ITEJIIS INVCl."91 MRK rfJMBER
- LOCATION CCJIIIPOt£NT NAIii£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM LES:::'.ND PBS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE
- ti.Jw:w EN6INEERIN6 DISCRPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A83411 BARRIERS OF LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS ARE RECESSED. COIIPL.T 07/11/85 HJIAH ERROR:
IJIERATOR ERROR fff PROJLEIII DESCRIPTION: BARRIERS BET CONTISWJS LES PBS ARE RECESSED INSTEAD OF RAISED PER 6UIDELir£ RECOPIMENDATIO N. 17N PARASRAPH tt.Jf!BER: 6.4.3.3.D.1 SUGGESTED BACl<FIT: INSTIU RAISED BARRIERS BEnEEN CONTI6UOIJS PUSHBUTTONS. DISPOSITION: DELETE-THERE ARE BARRIERS BEnlEEN BUTTONS WHICH PREVENT TWO BUTTONS FROfll BEINS P
- USHED ACCIDENTALLY.
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY
~ CODE Nl.JflBER:
~RKS:
C-'14. (Tl£SE LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS ARE LOCATED ON TURBINE l!IODEl ITEMS INVCl.VED: IIARK tUIBER LOCATION CClfllOtDT NAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LEGEND PBS ff t()T IN INV FILE t
/
~,J~ S~INEERit!3 D!SCRE?At<<:Y REPORT 02!2B!B6 SURRY UNIT2 CODE 8 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~ l al4TROC. DOES NOT INCREASE WHEN TURNED CLOCKWISE OR RISHT. ENS II -6 tk,/07/85 ltJIIIAN ERROR:
ERROR IN (J) RESPONSE. fH PIIIJlLElll Il£SCRIPTI0N: CONTRll.S 00 NOT ~ORM TO REOOIREl'!ENT TO INCREASE WHEN TURNfD CLOO<WISE OR TO THE RI6HT. 07N PARASRAPH l'IMBER:
- 6. 4. 2.1 SOOGESTED BACKFIT:
REPLACE CONTROL W/ SWITCH THAT INCREASES WHEN TURNED CLOO<WISE *. DISPOSITICW: SW POS &LABELI!E SO RAISE TO RISHT, LOWER TO LEFT. ALSO INC1..UD£ l'!AIN GEN YO 1111> LT RES CTRL SWS W/ BER SEN SIIS. DATA COLLECTION Il£SCRIPTI0N ~ CODE Nl>>IBER: TP-4, 1 C0'4TR0LS SURVEY REfllARKS: 4.1-3. 87N 6UIDLIN£ SHW-D READ: 64216 ITEJIIS ll'Ml.~: JIIARK tulBER LOCATION COfillOt£NT ~ SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEM 01R GEN NO 2 H NOT IN INV FILE + llf4 SEN Vll.T HNOT IN INV FILE 1 SPEED CNTII. H fi'.JT IN INV FILE + VO..T CNTII. ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
HIJ!l!AN ENSINF'l='Rlri6 !lISCREPA1£Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CODEC
- ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A148111 PROCEDURES AND REFERBa MATERIALS t<<lT ACCESSill.E FOR I.JUT 2 OP. NOD III-9 96/07/85
*ti.A ERROR:
DELAY lN ~1RIN6 INFORIIIATION. fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: PROC &REF IATERlAL ARE LOCATED OOTS1DE TI£ OPS BOlHlARYFDR UNIT 2. OP~ TO SET S0P£0NE a.SE TO SET REF. 8718 PARASRM-i ttJIIIBER: 6,1,1,lt,A.l SU66ESTED BACl<F IT:
,ORE PROCEDURES ~ REFEREfCE IATERIALS SO THEY ARE WITHIN THE OPERATORS BOUNDARY, fff DISPOSITION:
REFER TO E-35 (2M842'03l. PI-7 (20000103) ALSO REFERRED TD E-35*
- DATA CCLLECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1, 1 l()RKSPACE SURVEY
~RKS:
. P, 9.2-8 ITEJIIS INYll.',{I):
IARK tullER LOCATION~~ SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEM PROCEDURES ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 REFIKE fAt. ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1
- !-4'rw~ Et-.!S!NC-ERINS D!SCREAANCY REPORT '1?/*:)0/DC.
.....,~..,, uw SURRY ltlIT2 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai4e82 ~ EllJIPIENT NOT ADE~mv COVERED IN PROCEDURES. NOD II -6 01/30/86 ltM ERROR: I IIISINTERPRETATIOtt IF EQUIPf!ENT STATUS. Ir£0RRECT OPERATION 0 F ~ EllJIPIENT, 1H PROaEPI DESCRIPTION:
l(JRE DETAILED PROCEDURES FOR f£EDED 9-tARED SYS/PNLS, PROCEDURES DO MlT ADEOOATELY COVER SH ARED EIIJIPMENT. 17N PARAGRAPH N.lfl!BER: 6,1,3,1.E.5 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE PROCEDURES FOR THE CPERATION OF SHARED EQUIPIIIENT. 1H DISPOSITION: REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR SHARED EOOIPIENT TO ENSURE THEIR AD£QOO:Y, DATA CCU£CTIC* DESCRIPTIC* AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~RKS:
P.9.2-7 ITEMS INVCLVED: MAK rtJIIIBER LOCATION COlflOfENT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CIRC WTR Pr<<. ff f()T IN INV FILE t FIRE PROTCTN ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 6AS TURB Pf<<.. ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t VENT PN.. ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
~ EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY I.rm 2 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW tED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A05901' ABILITY TO SAIIPLE VENTILATI~ STREAMS NEEDED. I -5 03/17/86 ti.MN ERROR:.
fff PROBI..EII! DESCRIPTION: NECESSARY ABILITY TO SAMPLE VARIOUS VENTILATION STREAl'IS Ct(JT IN CR) WAS BUT IS t<<JT NOW AVA ILABI..E. 1780 PARAGRAPH NJMBtR: 6.1.1.1.A SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: PROVIDE ABILITY TO SAMPLE VENTILATION ST~. DISPOSITION: ABEITER SYSTE/11 ~ BEEN INSTALLED IM-IICH WILL ST()) ALL STACK FANS IF HIGH RADIAT
- Ill1 IS DETECTED. t<<J ACTION REQUIRED*
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP- 9. 2 VERIFICATI!l1 AND VALIDATI~
~RKS:
P.9.2-2 ITEIIIS INVCA.. VED: LOCATION COMPONENT NA/11£ svsm1 SUBSYSTEf!I VENT STREAIE ff rt'.lT IN INV FILE t
~ EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSNENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 22Al5l92 REOCTOR BRCl.Qff. CRITICll. BEL!J4 INSERTIOO LIIIIITS. TRS I -2 97/11/85 tlM ERROR:
ERROR IN CJ> RESPONSE.
'** PR08t.EJII DESCRIPTION:
DURIIE NJRM SETUP FOLLOWitE DJTA6E FOR STIii SEN INSPECTION, RX BR!X.GHT CRITICAL. BELIJI MIN I NSERTI~ LIIIIIT FOR *o*
"7N PARAGRAPH l'tJIIIBER:
6,1,1,1,A 6.3.1.2,A,2 SU66£STED BACKFIT: IfllPWIENT ADflIN CTRLS TO ENSURE RX t<<JT BROUGHT CRITI~ BELOW INSERT L.fllTS. Cfl!PTR MONITORIN 6 SYSIDI COOLD BE USED
'** DISPOSITION:
REIDIEND SHLLATOR TRNG: OOUBLINS THEORY, l/fll PLOTTING CLOSENESS TO CRITICALITY VS ROD INSERTIOO LIIIIITS CRNRKSl DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-3,1 1¥f<<J!ICIATOR SYSTEfllS REVIEW R01ARKS: HR-1, WRITTEN FROl'I LER-78-013103L--0. DISP:& RELATED l'IALFUNCS ITBIS INVOLVED: flARK tOIBER LOCATION aNlONENT , - svsm, SUBSYSTEfll AC-R-1 ff NJT IN INV FILE*
HUWIN EN6IN£ERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY LNIT2 CODE ASSESSIIIENT . LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al5ll3 EXCEEDED INTEIMl. CW TRANSIENT FG SURVEILUN:E, COIIIPLT 07/11/85 II.NIN ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE, fff PROIUJII DESCRIPTION: EXCEED INTRVI.. ON TRANS FQ SURV AXIll. PMR DISTRIB fllON SYSTRANS SURV 00 LAST (T +480 IHNSl. I NTERV EXCEEDED lHR 48" 1718 PARAGRAPH tfJ"8ER: 6,1,l,4.A,1 6,1,l,4.A.2 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:
.i IIIIPL.EPENT A COll)UTERIZED ll!ONITORING SYSTEJII FOR SURVEJL.L.Af,CE REGUIREJIIENTS.
fff DISPOSITI~: DELETE-THIS WAS AN ENSINEERirE NOT OP£RATI0NS RESPONS&.TY. THIS SURV NO LONGER R EOOIRED, NO LCltER A.T.S. ITEN. MTA COL.l..ECTION DESCRIPTION IWD CODE Nl.JIIIBER: TP-1, 1 WORKSPACE SURVEY
~RKS:
~-2. WRITIEN FRQIII LER-78-022/03l-0 ITEMS INVCl.W>:
IIIARK tOIBER LOCATION CC!flPOf£NT NA,£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEl'I TRNSIENT FQ ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
HUMAN EN6INEERil<6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSPIENT LAST. REVIEW
.HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A85l84 EXCEEDED INTERVAL~ TRANSIENT FO SURVEIWKE CORT IB7/11/85 tUIAN ERROR:
ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. Hf PAOa.£111 DESCRIPTION: EXCEED INTRVL. ~ TRANS FQ SURV BECAUSE LAST STEP OF AXIll. PWR DISTRIB MEAS T~ SEQ WAS N OT PERFORIED. i71N PARASRM-1 NUJIBER: 6.1.t.4.A.1 6.1.1.4.A.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: REINSTUT PERSONNEL. I1'1PL£ll1ENT COIIIPI.JTERIZED SYSTEfll FOR SURVEILLArCE TRAD<IN6. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-THIS SURVEILL.Ara IS r<<JT LONGER REQUIRED, r<<l LONGER A T. S. ITE/11,
- DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NI.JIIIBER:
TP-1. 1 l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY REMM<S: HR-3. WRITTEN FRCJIII LER-78-eJe/031..-t IT91S INVO..VED:
!ARK ~R LOCATION cmRlNENT ~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTE.111 T~ SEIDC H r<<JT IN INV FILE t
HlJll'.W ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSl!ENT LAST REVIEW* TITLE R£~IB1LITY STATUS DATE 22A95N5 MISSED SURVEILLANCE - RCP *c* FIRE PROTECTION I -2 07/11/85
.._ ERROR:
ERROR IN IP RESPONSE. 1H PROIUN DESCRIPTI~: QJRY ~ RCP *c* STATOR &BEARINi TEJll)S t()T DOtE HOORLY AS REQ. SURV REQ BECAUSE FIRE PROT t£AT DET NOT CPERAJl.E. 87118 PARASRAPH rtJIIIBER: 6,1,1,4,A.l *6.1.1.4.A.2 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: INVESTIGATE THE FEASIBILITY IF IMPWIENTINS ACO,ipufERIZED SYSTEl'I FOR SURVEILLArCE TRACKIN G. fH DISPOSITION: PUWT PROCESS CC!fRJTER BEIN; UPSRADED TO PROVIDE ItCREASED RELIABILITY. (ALSO SE
- E PI-99 C ~ l l . l DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION IWil CODE NUMBER:
TP-1, l liORJ<SPACE SURVEY REMRKS: HR-4. WRITIEN FROPI LER-78-036/031..-0 ITEJIS ItfJ(l.\01 "IRK fUIBER LOCATI~ CIJllOt£NT NAfE SYSTEIII SUBSYSTE/11 ID> C STATOR ff t()T IN INV FIL£ f
/
~ ~INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED f() TITLE 22A6l86 RWST TEJIIPERATURE GREATER THAN 45 DES F.
SURRY UNIT2 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY EN6 ASSESSM£NT STATUS I -2 LAST REVIEW DATE 12/19/85
~ ERROR:
EllJIMNT FAIWRE
/
fff PROa.£111 DESCRIPTION: RWST IDIP INDICS R£AD 44 DES F & 46 DES F ON DN.S I I II RESPECTivaY. CALIBRATION PERFOR IED: Oft. I INDIC LOW. 1788 PARA6Rf¥lti rOIBER:
- 6. 5.1. 2. F
!ll66ESTED BACKFIT:
INSTIU 3RD CHN.. TO PROVIDE COfflRMIN6 INDIC. REINSTRUCT OPS TO TAKE CORRECTIVE OCTION BEF ORE LIIIIITS ARE READ£D, fff DISPOSITION: PROVIDE ~RROW RANGE CONTROL, INDICATION AND ANNKIATION. (35 DES F TO 55 DES F
)
DATA COIJ.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tOIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~RKS:
HR~. WRITIEN FROM L.£R-82-044/i3L-@.~ IIDIS IHVll.~: fllARK NJIIIER LOCATION COfll'.lOt£NT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII TI-CS-1Ml H NOT IN INV FILE
- TI-CS-1NB HNOT IN INV FILE I TI-CS-2Ml RAA308 IETER CONTAINP£NT SPRAY SYSTEJII TI-cs-2'NB RAB388 METER COHAINIENT SPRAY SYSTEJI
ENSINEERit<<l DISCREPANCY REPORT tt.lMN 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPOOIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A86311 BRCl<EN cnmn. SURFOCES. NOD I -5 11/38/86 IUllN ERIKIR: IF BRO<EN CONTRCl.S/COlflOt£NTS 60 llfflTICED/~REPAIRED, Tl£Y MAY l()T BE AYAILIAEU IN THE CF EIERSEfCY. tH PROa.91 DESCRIPTI()I: IT01 ~ IJAIIIA6ED '<SIIIASHED> APPARENTLY BY SOJIETHIN6 STRIKING IT. UN PARAGIRlH NlJ!BER:
- 6. 4. 1. 1. E. 1 SUGGESTED ~IT:
INST~ QJARDS ARCllND ANY CTRLS/COf!PS CLOSE TO FLOOR TO PROTECT AGAINST ACCIDE.'iT~ DAP!A6E. tH DISPOSITION: PR0YID£ ~ THAT 00 N:JT PRESENT ASAFETY PROBLEM OR RECESS OR RELOCATE ESPECI
~y ~ TURBINE SI.PERVISORY ~L*
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ M.JIIBER: TP-4. 1 CClfTROLS SURVEY
~Rl<S:
DS-5 ITBIS INYCl.YED: - MAI< tUIBEA LOCATION COflPOrENT tM: SYSTE/JI SUBSYSTEfll FUSE llll.DER ff N:JT IN INY FILE t
HUJAf ENiINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY LWIT2 CODE C RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REYIEW DATE 22Bill42 ~RENT roH.ESEND INDICATOR LIGHT IEANIN6. t<<lI) III-9 07/11/85 ttJIIAN ERROR:
ItttIBITED LEARNING. fff PROa.91 IIE&:RIPTION: LABEL t()T PROVID£D TO INDICATE ~IrE Cf LISHT HN LIT uera ~ N\JIIBER: 6.5.3.2.A. l
~STED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE LABEL CLOSE TO INDICATOR LIGHT TO SHOW IEANINS OF LIGHT WHEN LIT.
'** DISPOSITION:
Tl£SE ARE POWER AVAILABLE INDICATORS. REPLACE LENS COYERS WITH WHITE ONES.
- DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-6. 1 LABELS IWD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-5. l DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: DS-18. RED t()N-LESEND IND LTS ON BORATION INTEGRATORS BB 2-1 IT91S ItMl.VEih IIIARK NJIBER LOCATION CO!PCIJENT ,f'.IIIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RED !OH.ES H t4JT IN INV FILE*
llJMN ENHNEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- t£D t<<) TITLE SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22F23126 YENTIUITION PAIEl. CONTROLS FDR UNIT 2 Ir<<:OOENIENTLY LOCATED RESPONSIBILITY EN6 ASSESSMENT STATUS II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE e11u1as
~ ERROR:
DELAY DR ERROR IN tl>ERATDR RESPCNlES tff PROa.81 DESCRIPTION: I.NIT 2 VENT PN. C()ITROI..S LOCATED IN UNIT 1 e1ee PARASRIPH OBER: 6.8.2.1,A 6.8.2.1.B 6.8.2.1,C SIJ36ESTED BACl<FIT: RELOCATE 1+1 DISPOSITION: PERFDRIII RELOCATION STUDY. SEE DS-21~2 - 8 !22A01306>, DS-28 !22A03215>, PI-117-3 128983816),
.DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE ~R:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1,2 ANTHRCJPOIIIETRICS SURVEY REJIIARl(S: PI-19-9 ITEJIIS INVCl.VED: fllARK NJMIIER LOCATION CClfJIDP£NT l'f.llE SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEPI H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1
ttM OOINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT3 CODEC ASSESSIIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE . 238N482 STlff'IN6 t<<>D III-8 02/14/86 tUIAN ERROR: LACK OF TIIIEl.Y RESPCNiE TO EVENTS RE!lJIRI"1:i IIVIEDIATE COAREC TIVE ~Tl~. EXCESSIVE l<<:IRl<l..00>, lff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: CURRENTLY: 3 RO'S & 1 SRO. DURIN6 SOIE EVENTS POTENTIAL TASK LOADIPE PROSS MY ARISE, (E.6
- I LOSS OF ~ POER) 87N PARflSRAPH rtJIIIBER:
6.1.3,1.D 6.1,1,2,A
!IJ66ESTED BACKFIT:
INVESTIGATE tECESSITY FOR ADDI"1:i ~ ADDITI!JfA. RO TO EACH SHIFT AND IF RE!lJIRED - IIIIPLEJIEN T, lff DISPOSITION: ADfllIN CTRL. RECOIEND THAT 4TH CPERATOR, PER APPENDIX "R", BE AVAILABLE TO CR WI THIN A StllRT PERIOD OF TI~* DATA cou..ECTION DESCRIPTION jWI) CODE MER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION
~RKS:
YD-6, (DURIM:i WA!.KTKRU, 5 OPS OBSERVED RESPONDING TO EVENT.> ITOO IrMl.'tllh MRK NJIIIBER LOCATI~ CQll)Qr£NT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RB¥;TOR CPS HNOT IN INV FILE f
DISCREPANCY REPORT t<<.JIIIAN EN6INEERirE 02/28/86 SURRY LNIT3 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23801115 ums CF MEASURE NODOO II -6 88/87/85 IUIAN ERROR: IUSINTERPRETATI~ OF DISPLAYED OOTPUT. Hf PIICB..EN DESCRIPTION: Tl£RE IS NO L.ABa OR onER INDICATION CF DISPLAYED PARAMETERS OR ~ITS BEirE DISP'LAYED. 87N ~RAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1.1.B 6.5.1.4.A 6.6.1.1 St.66ESTED BACKFIT: ADD APPROPRIATE UNITS OF l!IEASURE <E. 6., SPf!). Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-1 (23A01802) *
- DATA CD..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION ~ VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS ~D LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: VD-11 ITBIS INYCLVED: IIARK tUIBER . LOCATI<lt COfl.POfENT NAI£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEPI BIERS CST 13 H NOT IN IPN FILE
- FI-1-945 HNOT IN INV FILE* /
FI-1-*946 HNOT IN INV FILE f FI-VS-118 ff NOT IN INV FILE* LI-DA-UIA HNOT IN INV FILE f LI-DA-111AN HNOT IN INV FILE* LI-DA-1188 HNOT IN INV FILE f NIH-41 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 NR-1-42 ff NOT IN INV FILE*
- NR-1-43 klH-44 HNOT H r<<lT IN IN INV FILE.*
INV FILE f
tlJMN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT3 HED t(): 23891105 IT01S INYCl..VED: MRK tUGIER LOCATION ClJIIIPOr£HT , - SYSTEfil SUBSYSTEfil PHIS-119 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 RSHXASW ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RS HX B SW ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 RS HX C SW ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 RSHXDSW ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 RWST LVL CH3 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t RWST LYL CH4 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1
HUMM E~lNEERirE DISC:REPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86
- 23881286 RELATED ~TRCl./DISPLAY 6ROO>IN6 TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESS1ENT STATUS JI -7 LAST REVIEW DATE 02/14/86 ttllAN ERROR:
IDl>ORAl ERRORS - DELAY IN SEARCH ~ REsmtiE THE, lff PAOa.EN DESCRIPTION: CNTALS/DISPS SHClJLD BE ASSIGNED TO PM..S IN Fl.N:TION 6RIXPS RE~TED TO SYSTEM STRLCTURE, (W
/IN &*BET. 6RllJ>Sl 8788 PARAGRMi UBER:
6,8,1,1,A 6.8,1,1,B QJ66£STED BACl<FIT: INVESTIGATE FEASIBILITY !F CCl.OCATING FUtCTlONALLY RELATED GROUPS OF CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS l*f DISPOSITION: COHTRCl. REARRAtEEIENTS ARE f()T CRITICAL FOR SAFE OPERATION OR~ (NOT HISH SAFETY IMPORTIN:El. NJ ACTION REQUIRED*
~TA COL.L£CTION DESCRIPTION IWD CODE tUIB£R:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMRKS: VD-3-1. ITEMS IrML~: . IIARK tOBEA LOCATION COIIPClENT tfl,IE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII IISA SUPP BYP ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 lilSR SlJIP IY ff f()T IN INV FILE 1
.IUIIW EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CODE A RESPl}ffiIBILITV ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 23881287 ARRANGEIENT CF RELATED ~TJn.S/DISPLAYS ENS II -5 "5/91/85 ttM ERROR:
SUBSTITUTION ERROR: READIFE THE WRIN3 DISPLAY; OCTUATIN6THE WR£N3 ~ROL. fH PRIJIUIII DESCRIPTION:
~ R D CONTRB.S AR£ r<<lT AR~ IN Tl£ SAi£ ORDER AS ASSOCIATED VERTICAL BOARD DISPLA YS. EACH ~TROL 9WLD OCOJIY Tl£ SME RELATIVE POSITION AS ITS RELATED DISPLAY, 87N PARA6RM1 ~fl!BER:
6.9.2,2.D 6.9.2.2.B.1* 9.J66ESTED BACKFIT: REVERSE ORDER OF CTRLS ON BB, ADDRESS IN TRAININ6 TO ENSURE CORRECT RE-LEARNING. fH DISP0SITION1 DISPLAYS ON VERT!~ BOARDS ARE Be:Irti IIEIIOYED ~D OCTUAL VALVE POSITION INDICATI ON IS BEIFE ADDED ON BENCHIOlRD ABOVE CONTROLS PER OCPS 85-07 AND 85-eB* DATA cou.ECTION D£SCRIPTI0N AND COD£ NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REII\RKS: YD-4, (DISPLAYS TO BE fllOVED: YI-VJIIS-lilA, YI-VIIIS-181Bl ITEJIS IfMl.VED:
!!ARK rt.lllBER LOCATION coimENT tM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM PCV-1455C ff r<<lT IN INV FIL£*
PCY-1456 ff r<<lT IN INV FIL£* YI-YM5-181A ff r<<lT IN INV FIL£* YI-VMS-111B H t(JT IN INV FIL£*
HJIIIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfiENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 23a81298 VERIFICATI~ CF EOOIPIENT STATUS ENG I -5 11/11/85 HJIAN ERROR:
BASINS DECISION ON ERROEOUS INFO. FAILURE TO OBTAIN OR APPL YALL ~ T DECISI~ Ir.FO. lff PROIUPI DESCRIPTION: TURB TRIP INDICS; STCP WS &REHTR STATUS INDICATORS l()T RELIABLE TO VERIFY W POS, AUX CP S itJST BE SENT TO PUffl e1ee PARASRAPH N.Jf!BER: 6.S.1.1.B SU66£STED BACKF IT: INVESTIGATE REASON FOR INDICATOR UNRELIABILITY ~D CORRECT. fff DISPOSITI~: EN6IrEERIN6 TO CONSULT WITH MAfUACTURER (F LIStiT SOCKETS TO SOLVE PROBl..91. COOR DINATE WITH OC LJlSRADE E-31 (20A02309)
- DATA COU£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION
~RKS:
VD-5 IIDIS IPMLIIED: MARK ~R LOCATION cc>>IPOHENT tM: SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEJII
~HF. INDICAT H f(JT IN INV FILE t TURB STCP W ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
HUMAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/26/86 SURRY ~IT 3 CODE A ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23001223 RELATED CONTROL/DISPLAY GROUPING ENG II -5 83/26/86 tUIAN ERROR: TEti!PORAL ERRORS - DELAY IN SEARCH AND RESPONSE TIME. Hf PROBLBI DESCRIPTION: CTRLS/DISPS SHllJI.D BE ASSIGNED TO PNLS IN FUNCTION GROUPS RELATED TO SYSTBI STROCTURE (II/I N & BET GROUPS). 8780 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER: 6.8.1.1.A
- 6. 8.1.1. B SUSSESTED BACKFIT:
INVESTIGATE FEASIBILITY OF COLOCATINS FUNCTIONru.Y RELATED GROUPS OF CONTROLS IVm~DISPLAYS DISPOSITION: Hf SEE DIAGRAM FOR RECOl'fflENDED REARRANGBENT. NOTE:SINCE cnrr TOT PR, CTPIT TOT PRS, AND LI-DA-100 ARE NOT FUNCTIONALLY RELATED, THEY DO NOT NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FUNCTIONAL GROUPINS. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REf!!ARKS: VD-3-2&3 ITE~ INVOLVED: l'IARK NUl'!BER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LI-DA-100A ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-DA-110B ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-RS-150A ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-RS-150B ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-RS-151A ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-RS-151B ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-Lll!-100B ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-IJH00C ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-Lll!-100D ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-IJl-11 lA ff NOT IN INV FILE t
ltlA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86
- 23N1224 RELATED ~TR(L/DISPLAY SRCU>INS TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY NOD ASSESSIENT STATUS III-7 LAST REVIEW DATE
'81/38/86 tlJIAH ERROR:
IDPORAL ERRORS - DELAY IN SEARCH AND RESPOHSE TIME. fff PROll.EM DESCRIPTION: CNTRI..S/DISPS SHtllD Be: ASSI6tED TO PM..S IN Fl.CNTION SROOPS RELATED TO SYSTEJII STRUCTURE, (W
/IN AND BET SRW>S).
8718 PARAS~ tUIBER:
- 6.8.l, l,A 6.8.1,1.B SU66ESTED BACKF IT:
INVESTISATE FEASIBILITY If' CCl..OCATIN6 FOCTIONLLY RELATED GROUPS OF CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS Hf DISPOSITIIJI: PUT RVLIS !l4 VB tEAR CORE COO.INS JIONITORS AND KEYPAD ON Be:N:HBOARD NEAR CRT DIS PLAY CCMR(LS. REFER TO ICC UPGRADE PER E-29 121A01136l
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUPIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATIIJI
~RKS:
VD-3...\ ITENS IrMl.i.£D: NARK NJIBER LOCATION CQ!ll0r£NT NAlE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII COR a.NG !IOI _ ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t IM.IS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 !
OOlNEERlrE DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86 l{J!IIAN SURRY UNIT3 CODE A AS&SSIIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE. 23101225 RELATED ~TROL/DISPI...AY 6RGPIN6 ENS II -5 81/30/86 ltM ERROR: TEJIIPOIR. ERRORS - DELAY IN SEARCH AND RESPONSE THE*
./
fff PROa.BI DESCRIPTION: CNTRLS/DlSPS 5HO.lD BE ASSISNED TO Prt.S IN F!JCTION SRW>S R£LATED TO SYSTEf!I STRUCTURE, !W
/IN & BEWT 6ROOPS),
8786 PARAGRAPH ruBER: 6.8.1,l.A 6.8.1,1,B
!lJ66ESTED BACl<FIT:
IHVESTISATE FEASIBILITY CF al.OCATirE FOCTIOtRLY RELATED GROUPS OF CONTROLS ~D DISPLAYS fff DlSPOSITI~: IIEARAANSE SI CTRLS !ACru:ITION & R£SETl AND CLS <ACTUATION & R£SET> AND DO. _ADD DISCHARSE VIL VE AND PlJl>S. DATA COUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RBIARl<S: VD-3-5 I TENS INY<l.\Eh flARK romER LOCATION CO!fll)ENT NllE SYSTE/11 SUBSYSTEf!I CLS CTfl.S H NOT IN INV FILE f SI CTRLS HNOT IN INV FILE t
tlM EN6INEERIM3 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 02/28/86
- TITLE SURRY ~IT3 CO~ B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 23812814 ~IT VALLE PROORESSIIX-4 II -7 05/01/85 KM ERROR:
READIN6 ERRORS. fff PROll£lll DESCRIPTION: THIJIIM£EL L()'.U) RATE j PER l!IttlTE ()I TURBirE PAr£L ~ 6=* .31. & 8=.6j SO SE1l1.J8a IS 1%, ~
, 31. 4% 51
- 31.
- 61 171118 PARA6RAPH NUIEIER:
6.5.1.5.C SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE SCALES WHICH INCREASE BY ~ITS IF 5 6PM. DISPOSITION: RECCN9END REPLACIM3 THUPIBWHEEL W/ ONE PRCJlERLY LABELED FOR ASCENDIN6 ttlll!ER PROSR ESS (.3, .6, 11 2, 3, 4, 5%1 DATA COLLECTIIX-4 DESCRIPTION AND CODE tOIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATIIX-4 AND VALIDATI()I TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY
~li<S:
VD-8-3 ITalS IrMl.lJElh MRK NEER l.OCATl()I COflPO£NT NA,£ SYST91 SUBSYSTel ff MJT IN INV FILE t
llJIIIAN ENGINEERING DISC~V REPORT 03/03/86 SURRV IJHT3 CODE A ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23882243 ~IT Vjl.l£ PROSRESSI~. ENS II -5 18/17/85
~ ERROR:
READING ERROR lff PROBWI DESCRIPTION: SF°*W FLO IND PROORESSES IN I.WITS CF 7 6PM. SUCCESSIVE Vjl_l£S INDICATED BY UNIT GRADS St<<J LLD PROORESS BY UNITS OF 1,2,5, 18 OR "1.TIPLE ll£REOF. 0780 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER: 6.5.1,5.C
- SU66£STED BACKFIT:
PROVIDE SCIUS WHICH INCREASE BY UNITS OF 5 6PM.
*** DISPOSITION:
REFER TO PI-71-14 (20A02216l,
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~RKS:
VD-8-1. ITEfllS INVCl.VED: IIARI< tUIBER LOCATION C(Jl)(lENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM Fl-Fw-290A ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 FI-FW-280B ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 FI-FW-280C ff r(JT IN INV FILE 1
HUIAN ~N6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86
- TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CO~ ,
RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 238822~ I.WIT Vil.LE PROORESSI~. rot>LT 08/07/85 It.A ERROR:. READIN6 ERROR. Hf PROll.91 DESCRIPTIIJ4: S6 FLO IND PR00R£SSES IN !.NITS OF 7 GPIII. SUCCESSIVE Vll.l£S INDICATED BY UNIT GRADS SHClJLD PROORESS BY ISEE RNRIO 0700 PARAGRAPH NI.JfllBE:R: 6.5.1.5.C SUBGESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE.SCALES WHICH INCREASE BY UNITS OF 5 GPJI, Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE- 17 IS EASILY READ ON IETER. SEE PI-71 *
- DATA ClllECTION De:SCRIPTI~ AND CODE NIJIIIBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Vll.IDATION REMARKS: VD-8-2, PROB D£SC: UNITS OF 1,2,5, 10 OR MULTIPLES THEREOF. ITEMS INYO..VED: JIIARI( UBER LOCATION C()ll)()QT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJ!I Ll-1-494 ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t Ll-1-495 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 LI-1-496 ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t
HUIIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY .~IT 3 CODE B ASSESSPIENT LAST REVIEW HEO r<<J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23882486 ~R SPEED ADJUSTABILITY t<<ID I -2 13/17/86 IUIAN ERROR:
BASirE ADECISION ON INADEOOATE INFORIIIATICW.
Hf PROBt.01 DESCRIPTI~:
PRESENT SPEED OF 1 IN/HR IS CONSIDERED INADEOOATE TO TRACK RATE-CF-otANSE lNFO A:CORDIN6 T 0 CPS. CSEE 1191ARKSJ 8710 PARAGRAPH tu!BER:
6.5.4.1, I SJ68ESTED BACl<F IT:
PROVIDE WIDER RAN6E'SC1US WITH FASTER PAPER SPEED, SlfilILAR TO THE NEUTRON FLUX RECORD£ R.
fff DISPOSITION:
ENSURE COOLilOWN RATE ON ERF Cc>>IPUTER AS BACKUP TO PROCESS co,ip(JTER, HEATUP/COOLD
- ~ RATE CURVES VIA GRAPHICS DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUi.BER:
. TP- 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATI~
TP- 5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE#IRKS: VO- 7. IF PLANT CCJIIIP DWN, OPS DEPEND ON RCRDS TO TRACK COOLDN IIDIS ItMl.VED: LOCATION COfllPONENT NAJE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TR-1-413 ff NlT IN INV FILE t TR-1-423 ff NOT IN INV FILE t TR-1-433 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t
~ ENSI~ERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT al/83/86
- HED NO 23803818 FAlLTY/IKWIR LOGIC TITLE SURRY ~IT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY EN6 ASSESSIENT STATUS I -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 05/IU/85 ttM ERROR:
REPORTIN6 SISNll. 000 IN WRCN:i DIRECTION. LATE RESPONSE TO S TAllJS D'SNlE, FORll.lATIN6 ERRIIEOUS RI.LES/PRir<<:IPLES
"* PR01l91 DESCRIPTION:
L06IC IS SUSPECT, W/ BOTH SAN &RED LTS ILLI.JIIIINATINS SIIU.TANEOUSLY. TO VERIFY FLOW l))S RE FER TO INDICATOR~ VB 171!10 PARASRAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1, 1,B 6.5. l. l.C SU6GESTED ~IT: IHCI< REASON FOR SIIIJLT INDICATOR ILLU!JII~TION, IF FAULTY CORRECT, IF CORRECT ADDRESS INT RAINIIE OR REDESISN.
"* DISPOSITI()I:
RECOIEND INSTAUIN6 POSITION INDICS ON CN CIRC WTR OUTLET VVS IN PERCENT, FLOW OR DEfllAND AS APPROPRIATE. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI()I AND CODE NU!tilER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATIOO ~ VALIDATION
~RKS:
VD-9 IIDIS INW.VED: IIARK ru!BER LCJCATI()j C(Jl)O£NT NAME SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII CN CIRC WTR H NJT IN INV FILE t
/
I I I
~ ENGINEERING DISCREPAtCY REPORT 03/83/06
- TITLE SURRY IJHT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSPcNT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 23&03tl9 FlJCTICNUY SRO.PED CONTRCl.S 00 II -6
~ ERROR:
Ir£REASED SEARCH THE/DELAY IN RESPONSE THIE. I H+ PROBWI DESCRIPTION: TD AFW PP r<<JT SRWPED W/ 0Tf£R AFW PPS. FUf(:TIIJtRLY RELATED CTRLS SHCllD BE TOOETHER WHEN IDENTICSl. IN PURPOSE 07N PARA6RAPH NUMBER: 6.8.2, l,A,2 St.66ESTED BACl<FIT: EVALUATE NECESSITY FOR LOCATING CTRLS IN CLOSER PROXIPIITY TO EAOi 0Tf£R AND RELOCATE IF NE. CESSARY. H+ DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI -62 (28A03011> AND PI-117 (2000-3016)
- DATA CCl.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
~S:
VD-10. IT91S INV(l.UED: IIARK tUIBER LOCATION t:O,l)()f£NT l'M: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff t()T IN INV FIL£*
IIJIIIAN EN6INEERiffi DISCREPIKY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY lJj IT 3 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCWSIBILiiY STATUS DATE 23883846 IIIISSil'E C0"4TR0LS. r<<JD II -6 03/17/86 ttJIIIAN ERROR: DELAY IN RE~ THIE, Hf PROll.91 DESCRIPTION: PORVS ,UST BE ~ISOLATED LIXALY. 8790 PA~RAPH NJIIIBER:
- 6. 4, 1, 1, A SOOGESTED 8'0<FIT:
ADD ,IJVS (OR AT LEAST LI"IT SWITCHES} TO STEAPI SUPPLY VALVES. Hf DISPOSITI~: Ifi>ROVE IPERABILITY THROUGH REPAIR OF PIS PORVS AND PROVIDE STATUS OF AVAILABILIT Y ON TURNOVER StEETS. DATA COLl.£CTION DESCRIPTION ~D CODE MJll!BER: TP- 9. 2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ TP- 4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY REAARKS: VD-13 I IDIS INVCL VED: MRK QBER LOCATION C0'4JONENT NA,£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM PORVS ff ltJT IN INV FILE
- HUIAH EN6IrEERIN6 DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT3 al~ B ASSESSfllENT LAST REVIEW HEil NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23803847 M1SSIN6 CONTRCl.S EN6 I -4 07/11/85 tUIAN ERROR:
DELAY IN CP RESPONSE. fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: BYPASS VALVES FOR IIIAIN STEAfl LINE TRIP VALVES A~ LIDUY OPERATED IN !WE~RDS BUILDING (APPROX 158 DES F), 8710 PARAGRAPH NI.JMBER: 6.4.1, l,A SIJHSTED BACKFIT: ADD l<<lVS IN CR FOR BYPASS Wl.VES. fff DISPOSITION: PROVIDE ~TE THROTTLE CAPABILITY <TRIP CLOSE) IN CR FOR BYPASS VALVES. IN VICI NITY IF PIS TRIP Wl.VES. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4. 1 ~TROLS SURVEY REJ!IARKS: VD-13-3 ITEflS INVCLVED: IIARK NJIIIBER LOCATION CQIRJENT NAME SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII HIS-116 ff N'.IT IN INV FILE_ t l-flS-155 ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t 1-IIIS-84 ff N'.IT IN INV FILE t 2-flS-116 H l<<:IT IN INV FILE 1 2-flS-155 _ff N'.IT IN INV FILE t 2-flS-184 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
HUMAN E116INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 03/03/86
- HED f()
231&3852 MISSING ~TRCILS TITLE SURRY ~IT3 CODE B REBP'lIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS
- II -7 LAST REVIEW DATE 87/11/85 EN6 tUIAN ERROR:
DELAY IN CP RESPOEE. fff PROIUII DESCRIPTic>>I: II() ~ ~RIii SILENCE PB IN CR. r(JT Et<<&t OC1<., RESET, TEST PBS IN CR. 87N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.4.1.1. A SUB6ESTED BACKFIT: ADD Ufflll SILENCE PB AND ,ORE ~' RESET AND TEST PBS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-56-4
- DATA al.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE N.JU£R:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-4.1 ~TRCl.S SURVEY REMARKS: VD-13-4 IT91S INV<LVED: IIARK l'UIBER LOCATION ~NT NAflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTE,i ACIOOII.ED6E ff f()T IN INV FILE t RESET H f()T IN INV FILE t SIL.Eta ff f()T IN INV FILE t TEST ff f()T IN INV FILE t
HI.A 8'6INEERHE DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 03/03/86
- t£D NO 23803867 INTENDED ACTI~
TITLE SURRY ~IT3 COI£ RESPONSIBILITY ASSEss.ENT STATIIS a>>JILT UlST REVIEW DATE U/31/85 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN OP RESPONSE, f'OIM.JLATIN6 ERRCM:ll.lS RULES~ 6UIDN6 PRIICIPLES. fff PROaEM DESCRIPTION: OCUATION Cf' BIT BYP IV TO COLD LEG RESULTS IN OREE IN HOT LES f'LOW. RELATil)EHIP IS COHF USINS, NOT APPARENT. 0780 PARASRAPH NUMBER: 6.6.3,2,A SU6GESTED BACl<FIT: ADD !()RDS TO LABEL ~/OR APPLICABLE PROCEDURES EXPLAINING SYSTEM EFFECTS OF CONTROL ACTUA TION. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-POSSIBLY SIIIUTOR PROB. IN CR If' f'LOW PATH CH~, ~ CHANG£ IN HOT LE 6 FL~ WOOLl) BE ~TICIPATED* DATA cw.ECTIOH DESCRIPTI~ ~ CODE fUIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI0'4 ~ VAI.IDATI0'4 TP-6,l LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY RBIARKS:. VD-12 ITEMS IN\lll..VED: IIIAfll< fUIBER
- LOCATION COflla£NT t#.E SYSTEM SUBSYST91 ff r<<JT IN INV f'ILE t
HI.A ENGINEERING DISCREPAtCY REPORT 03/03/86
- HED t<<:J 23813168 IUSSIN6 C()(TR(U TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CODE A RE!3PCNSIBILITY ENS ASSESSfllENT STATUS II -5 LAST REVIEW DATE 07/11/85 ttJMAN ERROR:
DELAY IN CJ) RE~ tt-t PROBLEJII DESCRIPTI~: STI! StJlPLY WS flll.JST BE ISOLATED LOCALLY. TURB DRVN AFW PP STI! SUPP WS r£ED EIT1£R MOVS 0 R LIMIT SWS ADDED 0780 PARAGRAPH f(Jl!BER: 6.4.1.1.A SU6GESTED BACKFIT: ADD l'IOVS OR Lil!IT SWITCH TO TD AFW PU!'IP STEAM SUPPLY VVS t-ff DISPOSITION: SEE PI-103-35 (20003061> *
- DATA COLLECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY REMARKS: VD-13-1 ITOO INW.VED: l'.ARK tOIBER LOCATION CQIIIPMNT r.:l~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM sn, SUPP w ff t()T IN INV FILE* TD AFWP ff NOT IN INV FILE* /
HtM ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSMENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 23A01"82 SiltJLATOR/CR STANDARDIZATION. ENG II -6 il/38/86 ttJMN ERROR:
NEGATIVE TRANSFER OF TRAINING. (
/
fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: SiltJLATOR DOES 1'JT ACCt/RATaY REFLECT CR DESISN - CI-M,ED TO CR ARE l'(]T IMMEDIATELY illADE T
- 0 SIIIJLATOR.
0700 PARAGRAPH NUl4BE:R: 6.8.2.4.B SUGGESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE Sll'ti.JLATOR FIDELITY - ADJIIIN CONTROL fff DISPOSITION: UPGRADE Sill!ULATOR TO REFLECT CURRENT CONTROL.ROOM CXWTROL BOARDS; ALSO. FUTURE C ONTROL AND DISPLAY !'IODIFICATIONS SHO.JLD BE MADE IN SilllULATOR BEFORE THEY ARE INS TALLED IN THE CR. DATA COL-ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl'IBER:
- TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RE!'IARKS:
E-1. ITEMS 1NVCl.VED: IIIARK '. Jfl!BER LOCATION COMPONENT NAIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM SH!!LATOR/CR ff NOT IN INV FILE*
EN6lNEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT HU*IH 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT3 CODE C ASScSSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A01004 PAf£L CODINB ClWSISTENCY NOD III-9 05/28/85 HUMAN ERROR: Il'£REASED SEARCH TIIE. H4 PROBL.91 DESCRIPTI~: IMPll.SE ~ R PRESS f(JRIZ PITR IS LOCATED IN TAN SECT !f' BB, ASSOC TURB STAGE PRESS IND 0 NVERT PN.. IS IN BRAY. 1700 PARASRAPH tUBER: 6.5.1.6,D.1 6.5.1,6,D.3 SU66£STED BACKFIT: CONSULT CR COLOR CODINB CONVENTION PLAN AND CHANBE PANB.COLOR AS APPROPRIATE. H4 DISPOSITION: AS SlJ66ESTED IN BACKFIT, PAINT AREA AROUND 1ST STAGE PRESSURE INDICATORS TAN*
- DATA auECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUf!BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND V~IDATION TP-3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY REMARKS: VD-17 ITEJIIS INW. VED: _ NARK ro!BE:R LOCATION COP!PONENT NAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII PANEL COLOR HNOT IN INV FILE*
HUMN ENHNEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT3 CODE B ASSESSl!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A01NS EOOIPIENT ARRANGEMENT ENS I -5 05/28/85
~ ERROR:
DISPLAY SUBSTITUTION ERRORS. H£REASED SEARCH WE. tff PROBlEJII DESCRIPTION: Sil'IILARY RELATED EQUIP NOT BROUPED TD6ETt£R AND ARRANIEENT OF IDENTICll. INSTRlJIII BETWEEN D IFFERENT TRAINS DIFFER 07N PARABRAPH NUMBER: 6.8.2.l SUGGESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE SIMILAR INSTRUII! ARE BROUPED TOGETHER AND DIFFERENT TRAINS OF IDENTICAL EQUIP ARE AR RANBED IN SAME ORDER.
- fH DISPOSITION:
PERFORM EVll. OF B RCVRY PNI... PIODIFY "B" TRAIN TO AGREE WITH "A" TRAIN, PANEL IS NOT LAID OUT LOGICALLY. SEE PI-l9-t4 (2a113020l
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlfflBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS: VD-19, ITEMS INVCl.VED: f!ARI< MJPIBER LOCATION ~NT NAME SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEM BOR RCVY PN1.. HNOT IN INV FILE*
ENiINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT
~ 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT3 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED l'(I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A01& DEJIIARCATIIJ4 ENS II -6 05/28/85 tlJMAN ERROR:
DISPLAYS SUBSTITUTION ERROR-READiffl THE WRONS DISPLAY, INCRE ASED SEARCH TIIE. fff PROBL91 DESCRIPTI!l4: THE LISTED DISPLAYS ARE l()T SROI.PED T06£THER, M<INS RAPID DISCRl!IIINATION OF SYSTEfll ASSOC! ATI~ DIFFICll.T, 0700 PARA6RAPH NUMBER: 6.6.6.2.A SUSGe:STED BACKFIT: ENCLOSE FUNCTIONll..LY RELATED.DISPLAYS WITH DEMARCATION LINES BETWEEN FI-1-496 &FI-1-961 H4 DISPOSITION:
. HIERARCHICAL LABELING WILL BE Il'IPROVED, REFER TO LABELING SURVEY, PI-82 (20A0110 1)
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlmBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIARKS: VQ-25 ITEMS INV1l.VED: JIARK NIJIIIBf:R LOCATION COl!PONENT NAIE SYSTEJI SUBSYSTEM FI-1-943 ff NOT IN INV FILE* Fl-1-945 ff NOT IN INV FILE* F.I-1-946 ff NOT IN INV FILE* FI-1-961 ff l()T IN INV FILE* FI-1-962 ff l()T IN INV FILE
- Fl-1-963 ff NOT IN INV FILE*
HUMN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREMlCY REPORT 03/03/86
- HED t() TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CODE RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSNENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 23Ae2855 OBSG..ETE DISPLAYS CQ!liPI..T 07/15/85 t<<.WlN ERROR:
VISI.A. CLUTTER. fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: OPS REPORT THAT THE PLANT VENT SAflPLE ,i.()NlTOR IS NO LONGER USED. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUfl!BER: 6.5.1.1.C SOOSESTED BACKFIT: RaOVE DISPLAY FR!JI CR. fff DISPOSITION: RETAIN - DISPLAY fl!AY BE USED IN FUTURE *
- DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJMlER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Vj:t_IDATION REAARKS: VD-20 ITEJIIS INVCl. VED: IIIARK r-lJl'!BER LOCATION COMPOr£NT NAI£ SYST91 SUBSVST£ll1 PLNT VNT SAJII ff NOT IN INV FILE*
HlM EtEINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 03/03/86
- HED t<<J TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSfENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE
. NOD II -7 07/15/85 tUIAN ERROR:
LISTED INDICATORS HPVE NO OPERATING U,IITS OR OPERATINS RANS E lilt£ !'ARK IN65. lff PROBt.91 DESCRIPTION: THE ABOVE INDICATCRS HAVE NO OPERATING LIIHTS OR OPERATINS RAN6E ZOfE JIIARl<INGS. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER:
- 6. 5. 2. 3 SUS6ESTED BP.SKFIT:
ADD HIGrl AND LOW LlfllIT BANDINS TO INDICATORS. lff DISPOSm~N: REFER TO PI-110 (20002007),
- DATA f JLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NIJIIBER:
TJ..9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
*. P-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY ID!ARKS:
VD-26 ITEMS INVCl.VED:
~RI< NUMBER LOCATION C()IPOf£NT , - SYSTBI SUBSYSTEM ACCUM ALVL HNOT IN INV FILE t ACCIJII B LVL ff NOT IN ItfJ FILE* /
ACCUI! C LVL H f(JT IN INV FILE*
HUA EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 63/13/86
- HED NO 23Al2413 RATE OF CHANGE PERFQRIIRU AID TITLE SURRY ~IT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY NOD ASSESSIENT STATUS I -2 LAST REVIEW OOTE 87/15/85
~ ERROR:
ERRORS IN DECIS1~IN6. READit'1 ERRORS. , I Hf PROIUM DESCRIPTION: OPS ADDED SLOPED LH£ TO COVER 6LASS ON TRS TO FACILITATE lll0NITORIN6, IF BACKFIT UIPORT, A DD PERll!Ar£NT LINE. 1700 PARAGRAPH NUfllBER: 6.5.1,1,B 6.6.6.2.C SUSGESTED BACKFIT: P£RMANENTLY AFFIX LINE TO RECORDER USirE RULER AND PROTRACTOR. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-RATHER THAN PUTTIN6 CURVE ON TRS, SEE RECOfillENDATIONS FOR PUTTIN6 CURVE I NERF CIJIPUTER. (VD-7 (230e2486l DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE rumER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
- TP-3,l ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW TP-6,1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ROORl<S:
VD-24
!TOO INVCl.VED:
JIIARI< tUIBER LOCATION COMPOr£NT tM SYSTEJII SUBSYSTait TR-1-413 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE~ TR-1-423 HNOT IN lrN FILE i TR-I-433 H r<<JT IN INV FILE*
.HUA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86
- HED NO TITLE SURRY UNIT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASSESSIENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 23A02415 POOR C:O.TAAST ~ PEN RECORDER BETWEEN INK AND PAPER. NOD II -6 U/15/85
.._ ERROR:
ERROR IN IJl AESP()EE. Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTI~: 6RE£N JIIAAKERS DRYIN6 WT, PRODlCING PALE 6AEEN LINE/l'WlAKIAiICH IS NOT LE6IBL£ FAQIII ACROSS T 1£ BErOiBOARI). 0780 PARAGRAPH NlllmER: 6.5.4,1,A SUSGESTED BACKF IT: INSTALL 14AAKERS INTO RCRDRS THAT DO NOT DRY WT AS FAST,AND ARE BETIER IN CONTRAST TO Tl£ WHITE PAPER. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-79-6 12"2403) *
- DATA cou.ECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUl'lBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATIOH AND VALIDATION TP-5.l DISPLAYS SURVEY R91AAKS: VD-28 ITEJIIS INVCl.VED: - f!ARK rtlMBER LOCATION COflPCIP£NT NAl'IE SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEM HOT LES WR T H r<<JT IN INV FILE 1
ENGINEERING DISCREPAPCY REPORT HIMW 03/03/86 SURRY ~IT3 . CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED I'() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23Ai2917 Attt.t<<:IATOR LACKS RIN6BAD< NOD II -5 15/28/85 tOIAN ERROR: FAILURE TO RESPOND TO DESRADED SYSTEfll CONDITION.
*** PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:
~IATOR REQUIRES IIANJAL RESET. IF OP FORGETS TO RESET RETURN TO~ STATE IO'T INIT IATE 9UDITORY WARNING.
1700 PARAGRAPH NUl'IBER: 6.3.1.S SUSGESTED BACl<F IT: l()D L06IC, IN ANY STATE OF Ai.RIii SEG, HORN SOlNDS IF PROCESS STATE COOS FROf! r()RJII TO ABr<<JR Ill, (SEE REAARKSl fff DISPOSITION: IIIU. ENSURE THAT ANN.lfCIATOR RESPONSE PROCEDURE INSTRUCTS OP TO RESET THE ANNlJNC IATOR WTER CLEARING. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tt.JIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEl'IS REVIEW R91ARKS: VD-21. PROVIDE SPEC FLASH RATE FOR CLEARED ALARJIIS NOT RESET. ITEJIIS INVCl.VED: AARI< NIJIIIBER LOCATION CCJIIIPOtENT NAJIIE* SYSTEM SUBSYSTEfll PRZR SFTY W H N:JT IN INV FILE*
If.A ENSINEERIMi DISCREPANCY REPORT "03/83/86 SURRY UNIT3 CODE B ASSESSfi!ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A83848 HIGH RESISTIKE KEY OPERATED ~TROLS NOD II -7 07/11/85 tU!AN ERROR: DELAYED OPERATOR RESPONSE. fff PROBLEJII DESCRIPTI~: CTRLS ON SIMULATOR DIFFIW.T TO TURN. ~ UP AND R£ACHES RESISTIKE ABOVE IIIAX RECOIIIEHDE D 6 It0£S/PIUID. 8700 PARAGRAPH l'OIBER: 6.4.4.3 SUGGESTED BACl{FlT: DETERPIINE IF PROBWI EXISTS FOR SHULAR CTR1..S ~ UNIT 1. IF IT EXISTS THEN JIIODIFY/REPUlCE C ONTRCl.S/RECUT KEYS.
'** DISPOSITION:
REFER TO C-21 122A0.'32i7l
- DATA CCX..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIBER:
TP-4. l CONTROLS SURVEY REfllARKS: DS.-19, 0700 61.JIDELINE NO. StOULD READ: 644363 IIDIS INVCk. VED:
~RK l'OIBER LOCATION C(Jf)(lf£NT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 3*sI ACOI SW HNOT IN INV FILE 1 ASS BD TV ff t{)T IN INY FILE 1 B S6 BD TV HNOT IN INV FIi.£ I C SS BD TV ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PCV-2455C TAA317 CONTROL ~TOR CO(LANT IPRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR) SYS RELIEF Wl.VES PCV-2456 TAA316 CCWTRCL ~TOR COOLANT (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS . RELIEF Wl.VES SW 43-15J3 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1
ENSINEERINJ DISCREPANCY REPORT HIJA 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT3 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A03192 AMBIGLOOS ~TRCUER OPERATING CHARAl;TERISTICS. ENS . II -6 01/30/86 It.A ERROR: WRCN3 DIRECTION Of CONTROL ACTIVATION. l!ISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED OUTPUT. Hf PROBL91 D£SCRIPTION: SELECTI~ OF PIIN FLO OFTEN RESULTS IN DISPLAY OUTPUT OF 1* FUU. OPEN/FULL CLOSE. 07"8 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER:
- 6. 4. 2. 1 6. 6. 3. 8. B SUGGESTED BACKFIT:
REVISE OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF APPLICABLE CNTRLRS WHEREBY 0::F!J.L CLOSE, 100:=FULL OP EN. LABEL APPROPRIATELY Hf DISPOSITION: A_L INVERSEACTINS CTRLRS ARE iO BE LABELED AS SUCH. ALLR£VERSE ACTING CTRLRS WI LL BE IDENTIFIED BY NOD. REFER TO C-12 (20A03049) *
~rA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJPI.BER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-6.l LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJIIARKS: VD-14, CAUTION: rESATIVE TRANSFER AAJOR COICERN IN R£SOI.VIN6 lTf 4S INVCl.VED:
~ -II< N.J"8ER LOCATION ~ T NAPIE SYSTEPI S1JBSYST0I HASAN PCS ff NOT IN INV FILE f PRZR l'ISTR PR ff NOT IN INV FILE*
RHR HX BYP ff NOT IN INV FILE* sn, HDR PRES ff NOT IN INV FILE*
HlJIAN ENGIHEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86
- HED t() TITLE SURRY LWIT3 CODE B RESPONSIBILITY ASS£ssnENT STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE .
- 23Al3211 POSITION INDICATI~ II -6 il/31/86 IDAN ERROR:
EXCESSIVE/INADEQUATE COHIN.JAta Of CONTROL ACTION. f'1SINTER PRETATION IF CONTR(L POSITION. fH PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: KEY SWITCH POSITION DOES tt'.IT fl!ATCH REFERENC£ POSITION AS DEPICTED BY POSITION LABELS ON TH E CONTROL PANEL 0700 PARAGRAPH NUl'IBER: . 6.4,1,l,A.2 6.4.4.5.D.2 6.9.2.2.B,l SU66ESTED BACKF IT: REORIENT KEV OP SWITCHES SO POSITION OF KEV HOLE AATCHES POSITION LABELS ON CONTROL BlllRD. fff DISPOSITION: ESTABLISH CONVENTION - L.ABa AND AARK ~ TOP. PROVIDE POSITIVE INDICATION OF POS ITION. SEE DIAGR~ IN HED REPORT. REFER TD LABELINS STUDY PER PI-Be (20A9110ll
- DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE UBER:
TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4.l CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS: VD-15-l, ADDITIONAL 0700 6UID£L1N£: 6443F ITEJIIS !NW.VED:
!!ARK fUIBER LOCATION CIJi'IIPClf8T , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM PCV-1455C ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1 PCV-1456 ff NOT IN INV FiLE 1 /
HlJlllAH ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT3. CODE 8
~SSPiENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A03211 POSITION INDICATION. ENG II -7 i:l/28/85
~ ERROR:
EXCESSIVE/INADEQUATE CONTIMJAN:E IF CONTROL ACTION. PIISINTER 1 PRETATION IF ~TRCl. POSITION. fff PRCIBLEJII DESCRIPTION: THIJIIB SW &IND LTS POSITIONS DO NOT MTCH REFERENCE POSITION D£PICTED ON POS LABELS ON CB. 4 FIKTION HAS 5 POS. 8700 PARAGRAPH NU"8£R: 6.4.1.l.A.2 6.4.4.5.D.2 6.9.2.2,B.l SU6G£STED BACl<FIT: REARRANGE IND LTS: SL.CM LEFT OF FAST & FAST LEFT OF OFF RELABEL CTRL SW POS SO THUPIBSW POI NTS DIRECTLY AT SW POS . fff DISPOSITION: l(JDIFY POSTNS, ALIGN ARROW W/ POSTN LABELING, REWIRE SW, RELABEL LTS, REIOVE 5TH POSTN. SEE DIAGRAfl IN HED REPORT DATA COl..1.ECTION DESCRIPTION ~ CODE MfflBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY RENARKS: VD-15. ADDITIOtR. 0700 BLINE: 6443F ITEMS IN'v'Cl.VED: 11'.ARK IUIBER LOCATION COIIIPOfENT rM SYST~ SUBSYSTEM ff NOT IN INV FiLE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t . FM283 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEflllal. AND VOLLIIE ~Rll. SYSTEII BORATION FAB283 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEJIIICAL AND VOLIJIE CONTRil. svsm BORATION
HIJAAN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT 03/03/86 SURRY ~IT3 CODE B ASSESSMENT ~T REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23Ai3212 POSITION INDICATION EN6 II -7 15/28/85
'**EXCESSIVE/I~TE ERROR:
CONTINI.IAM:E rF ~TRCM.. ACTION. PIISINTERP RETATION rF ~TRO.. POSITION. ffl PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: TIDIB SWITCH POSITI~ DO NOT f!ATCH REFERErcE POSITION AS DEPICTED BY POSTION LABELS ON TH E cnmn. PANEL, 8780 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER: 6.4.1,1,A,2 6.4.4.5.D.2 6.9.2,2,B,l SUSGE:STED .BACKF IT: RELABEL CONTROL SWITCH POSITIOhS SO THUMB SWITCH POINTS DIRECTLY AT SWITCH POSITION, lff DISPOSITION: ALIGN ARROW WITH POSITION LAB8.IN6, REWIRE SWITCH, RELABEL LISHT AND ADD 3RD LIS
- HT. SEE DIAS~ ON HED REPORT*
DATA COLLECTION D£SCRIPTI0N AND CODE rtlPIBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION . TP-4,1 CONTRfl.S SURVEY REJIIARKS: VD-15. ADDITIONAL 0780 61.JIDELINE: 6443F IT91S INVO*.'JED: *
~Rt< OBcR LOCATION Cl)l!IJOENT , - SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 1-CS-P-2A ff NOT IN INV FILE t l-CS-P-2B ff NOT IN INV FILE*
2-cs-P-2A CM105 DISCRETE ROTARY CONTAitfENT SPRAY SYSTEM 2-CS-P-28 CAA106 DISCRETE ROTARY CONTAil'fENT SPRAY SYSTEM
HUMAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT3 CODE B ASSESSAENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23Al3213 THROTTLE VS. IOENTARY WiTACT SWITDI. NOD II -6 . 81/30/86 tUIAN ERROR: INADE~TE JIIAGNITUDE ~ CONTRll. ACTION. Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: THERE IS N'.I WAY OF DISTIN6UISH1ft3 IIOPENTARY ~TACT <I.E., SBLINS> VAl.V£S FRO" THROTTLE V
~VES.
i780 PA~RAPH tOIB£R: 6.4.l,l,C,l 6.6.3.8.A 6.6.1,1 SU66ESTED .BACKFIT: ADD SYIIBOLS AND/OR LABEL TO SWITCHES TO HELP DIFFERENTIATE THROTTLE SWITCHES FROM IIIOIEHTAR YCONTACT TYPES. fff DISPOSITION: ADD ALABEL WITH ASYIIBOL FOR IIIOIIENTARY (E.B., .) OR THROTTLE (E,S., +). PUT LAB
- EL BETWEEN INDICATOR LISHTS. REFER TO L.ABELil'E STUDY PER PI-82 120A01101),
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE ruBfR: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND V~IDATION T~'+.1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
~RKS:
VD-16 IIDIS INV!l.VED:
~RK NUPIB£R LOCATION CCJIPOrENT NA,£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTE/JI IIOV-1864A ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 Jil)IJ-18648 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 IIOV-1869A ff r<<JT IN* INV FILE 1 ,Kl\J-18698 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 *,ov-1898A ff r<<JT JN INV FILE t l'IOV-189&8 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 IIOV-CW-10eA ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t !tlOY-CW-lHB 11 t<<JT IN INV FILE t ,iQV-CW-10<<: HNOT IN INV FILE t l'IOV-CW-l 00D 11 NOT IN INV FILE t IIIOV-FW-151A ff NOT IN INV FILE t
HlM EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/S6 SURRY UNIT3 HED NO: 23A03213 ITEPIS INVCl.VED:
~RK rtJIIIBR LOCATION C()!ill)()ENT NAfE SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEll IIIOV-f'W-151B ff MJT IN INV FILE t !Cv-flH51C H t()T IN INV FILE*
IIIOV-f'w-151D HNOT IN INV FILE t IIIOV-fW-151E ff t()T IN INV FILE t IIIOV-flH51F ff MJT IN INV FILE t IOH1S-li3B HNOT IN INV FILE t IIIOV-i1S-li4B ff t()T IN INV FILE t
~ ENiIN£ERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT3 CODE B ASSESSAENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS ~TE 23A03214 CCNTR(l. POSITIONS NOT USED. I -5 11/11/85 ltM ERROR:
INADVERTANT CONTR(l. ACTIVATION. EXCESSIVE ~TlrtJAN:E OFCONT Rll. ACTION.
'** PROBL£111_DESCRIPTI0N:
THE AUTO PODE ON THESE SW1TCf£S IS ACTIVE, IOEVER PROCEDURES CAUTION OPS t()T TO PUlCE SWI TDi IN AUTO. 0710 PARASRA.OH NU"8ER: 6.4.1.1.A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: DISABLE AUTO LOGIC. I*+ DISPOSITION: INVESTIGATE lfiETHER AUTO Ft.H:TION IS EVER TO BE USED, IF MJT POSITION SHOJU> BE
- DISABLED. ALSO, ~ FROII MAN-OFF-AUTO TO OFF-PIAN-AUTO IF AUTO IS TO BE USED.
DATA CClLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATIO-. TP-4,1 CONTROLS SURVEY RB!ARKS: VD-22 ITEMS IrMl..YED:
!ARI< NlJIIIBER LOCATION COf!POM:NT , - svsm, SUBSYSTEM CS-25-6182 H l'()T IN INV FILE f CS-25-6IT248 ff NOT IN INV FILE*
- TITLE HlMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY SURRY LNIT3 CODE B REPORT RESPONSIBILITY ASSE~T STATUS LAST REVIEW DATE 23Ae3218 SErEIR. l()IJEJIIENT RELATIONSHIPS/ROTARY ~TROI..S NOD II -6 U/15/85 ttJIIIAN ERROR:
IIAY ~ RESPCHiE INCl)!PATIBLE WITH CPERATORS EXPECTATIONS, TIEREFORE, ERROR. fff PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION: lfiEN OP TURfE 00B COUNTERCLOCt<WISc, IIITR NEEDLE TRAVELS LEFT TO RT - NOT REPRESEHTATIVE OF OTHER~ KNOBS. 17110 PARAGRAPH NUl!IB£R: 6.9.3, 1,A SU6GEST£D BACKf IT: AN#l.YZE REllJIR£JIIENTS FOR Ct4MiIN6 THES£ CONTROLS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL SHULAR HASAN D I~ ~TROI..S/DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO VD-14 (23A031e2) DATA a:l.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATIOk R91ARKS: VD-27 ITEJIIS ItMl.YED: IIARK 1'4.JMBER LOCATION ~ T ~ SYSTEII SUBSYSTEA STII HDR PRSS HNOT IN INV FILE t
/
llWAA E~INERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/21/86
- TITLE 23A06811 SAFETY INJECTION RESET TIIE na.AY SURRY lftIT J amE B RESPONSIBILITY NONE ASSESSMENT STATUS CPT-LAST REVIEW DATE 03/17/86 tlJIII.AN ERROR:
DELAY IN RESPIHIE TIIIIE MAY RESUI.T IN RCS OOING SOLID lff PROBLal DESCRIPTION: OPS REPORT 5 MitllTE TIME Jl£1.AY REQUIRED FOR RESETTING SI IS Ml LONGER NEEDED sna THE BIT HAS BEEN DISABL£D. 1700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.4.1.1.e.1 SUS6ESTED BACKFIT: EITHER REIIOYE OR SHORTEN 5 MIN.ITE DELAY. lff DISPOSITION: TIME DELAY HAS BEEN CHll&D. TO 1 MIM.ITE *
- DATA al.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION iwD CODE NUl'IBER:
TP- 9. 2 VERIFICATION AND WUDATION TP- 4.1 COOTROLS SURVEY REPARKS: VD-23 ITENS INVOLVED: LOCATION COflPONENT NAflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII SI RESET TD ff r<<JT IN INV FILE *!
r
~ ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY ~IT 3 CODE B ASSES$11ENT LAST REVIEW l£D NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 238'111Nl IJERTial. PAtEL ACCESS AND CIRCllATION PATTERNS. EN6 II -6 03/17/86
~ ERROR:
FAILURE TO f()NITOR. NISINTERPRETIN6 STATUS, FATIGUE, t+t PROBLBI DESCRIPTION: l()RIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN BENCHBOARD AND VERTICAL BOARDS EXTREJIIE Ol=TEN MKING TASKS A TI<<l PERSON CPERATIIJo 1 TO CONTROL, OTl£R TO. OITOR. 8780 PARAGRAPH NJNBER: 6,1,1,3,D SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: SEPARATE BEtO!BOARD INTO TWO CONSOL.ES WITH PASSA6E BETWEEN TO FACILITATE EFFICIENT AND UNO BSTRUCTED fllOValENT,
., fff DISPOSITION:
INFOR!IIATION ,OST CFTEN USED AND ROST IMPORTANT FOR OPERATORS l4lS BEEN RECCJIIIIIIENDE DFOR INSTAU.ATION CW BErO!BOARD. SPLITIIN6 BENCHBOARD l'(JT POSSIBLE, REFER TO Pl
-119, (28081205, 20001220, 20001221, 20001222)
DATA CCk..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIBER: TP- 9. 2 VERIFICATION ~ VALIDATION
.TP- 1, l WRKSPACE SURVEY REJIIARKS:
W-1 ITEPIS INVCl.\/ED: SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEM tt NJT IN INV FILE f
~ ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT !B3/03/86 SURRY llt!IT3 CODE C ASSESSF.'El<l'T I.AfT llt-VIEH HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS rune 23V032a2 ccr.TROL ADEQUACY ENS III-9 Ht.M,i ERROR:
DELAY IN RE~ THE fff PROBWI DESCRIPTI~: LISTED TURB DRAIN VALVES MUST BE fj:WI) OCTUATED. t0Tt£R 4 VALVES AREA MOi'fflTIC) OP itJST ~ LI< TO DIRD TO PIANIRL Y ACTUATE. 1780 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.4.1.1.A 6.4.1.1.C SU6SESTED BACl{FIT: IF NOT TECtfdCALL Y PROHIBITED, PROVIDE AUTOMATIC LOGIC.
*** DISPOSITION:
~
/' IF NOT TECHNICALLY PROiIBITED, PROVIDE AUTO CP£RATIN6 LDSIC ON TURBINE TRIP.
DATA auECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJMBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4,1 ~TROLS SURVEY
~RKS:
VD-2 ITOO INVOLVED:
.w:\RK M.>>!BER LOCATION coitm£NT ~'£ SYSID1 SUBSYST8'1 IIICIV-SD-102A H r<<JT IN INV FILE i IIIOV-SD-102B ff NOT IN INV FILE 11
,-~
/. ,.~}}