ML20134N819
| ML20134N819 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry, North Anna, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1984 |
| From: | ABB IMPELL CORP. (FORMERLY IMPELL CORP.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134N792 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8509050370 | |
| Download: ML20134N819 (43) | |
Text
-
m o
\\
l
\\
==
...w..
4.
e
.8
- =
..6 4
-e ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS ASSESSMENT CONCERNING COATING CONTROLS AT NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS mm
...s.
1..
... ~
s.
6..
e
.e -
'L,..
..L.d
..a.
...J.-......
.a :........
.J
...s......
....L..
m f
1 8.
.i t
. a....
9
~
~ ~ *
-4.
L
. 4 i J...
g *.
.......k....
. -. -... =..
f IMPELL4 4
coru o atios e
e e
t J
i I
si EXHlBlT 26 Page - /--- Ot 25~~. Pages O
8,5,0905 pg
I ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS ASSESSMENT (X)NCERNING COATING CONTROLS AT NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS Volume I Report I
l.
Presented To:
Virginia Electric and Power Company i
I Prepared by:
Impe11 Corporation 333 Research Court Technology Park / Atlanta Narcross, Georgia 30092,*
]
^
August,1984 EXHl817 26 ~
Page 3,.,ot 28 Pages
7 1
t TABLE OF CONTENTS y
i g
J 1.0 Introduction 1 -1 2.0 Executive Sumary 2-1 3.0 Assessment Technique 3-1 4.0 Scenario Leading to the North 4-1.
Anna Difficulties i
- 5. 0 Observations 5-1 6.0 Recomendations 6-1 Appendices (Separate Volume):
A Documentation of North Anna Ductwork Painting B Existing North Anna Administrative Controls C Revised North Anna. Paint Controls D Surry Protective' Coating Program Review E Corrective Measures Taken By YEPCO 9 i 9
c
\\
l 1
EXHIBI-16 i
0 ot1 Pages p g, l
A 4
-wA A
.i p
J.
-4,&
__Aw m.a m J a-o
-J
-a g
'o
1.0 INTRODUCTION
- a
~ ~ ~.
1
- ]
i i -
t 1
1 4
0 l
4 8
i em e
4 9
]
9
. 9P l ~. *.
t, *? '.'
see
,*g, I
4 3
)
1
- s.
+
4.
m 9
i 3
,/
4 P
r 9
m 1
4.
k e
99 s
I e
i e
9 J
4 a
a
- a 9
i eq l
1
+
q 1
N e
D 9
EXHIBig. 26.
i Page.. - -. d Poses
- ~ ~ ~
..~
4
.c
,-.y..
_-_e_
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
In July 1984, Virginia Electric and Power Company was i
informed of a potential safety concern regarding paint that had been applied to the North Anna Unit 1 ring ventilation duct inside containment. Subsequent analysis by VEPCO in response to this ccncern indicated that the unqualified paint used had been applied to the galvanized ductwork in Unit 1 and that another unqualified coating had been applied improperly to the Unit 2 ductwork.
1.2 VEPCO Response Once knowledgeable of the unqualified coating application at North Anna 1, a three tiered assessment was initiated to detennine:
- 1) The extent of coating errors in existence at Surry and North Anna.
- 2) The insnediate actions to resolve safety concerns.
- 3) The long-term actions necessary to preclude recurrence.
The assessment of issue (1) included both sites and was completed by VEPC0 Jtaffs on August 12 at Surry and shall be completed at North Anna by about August 31.
To date no other definite examples of unqualified coating applications at Surry or North Anna have been identified.
Immediate action was developed to enclose the ventilation ducting at North Anna with 1/8 inch wire mesh. This activity was being pursued by ESC at North Anna and was scheduled for completion by August 25, 1984 for Unit 1, with Unit 2 completion during the present outage.
i a
Station management, QA management, and North Anna EAC had conducted evaluations of the events which had resulted in the application of unqualified paint at North Anna. Both Surry and North Anna had identified action plans (see Appendices D and E) to address issue (3).
VEPC0 management determined that an independent evaluation by an outside consultant was necessary to l
assure an objective assessment of the programs which may have been responsible for this occurrence.
Thi s report documents that independent evaluation.
1 -1 D(Hl817, M %
i PnSt A-.& W Pa**
m A
m
___e__--#__J m.
.ew
_m.-
J i
+
2.0 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
epm m m eem.
h M
1 e
l 1
1 9
!J 8
e J*
ei s
f, e
s
.e ;
. ~
2 e
ll
- ' N 's ig*
99 1
i
,e-6 0
4
\\
j
.ea f
]
l me
=
d g
4 a
b.
4, M'
s s
F e
R d'
' em i
I l
6
.i i
O
- m a
t 4
e d
e j
i I
- fd I
l t
D
- 8 EXHIBl 26 onen ewe.
_a.t eum t'
I I
~
(
l 2.0 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
s 2.1 North Anna The sequence of events which resulted in the application of unqualified coatings to the North Anna ventilati6n ductwork (see Section 3.0 and Appendix A) in 1983 indicate extensive personnel abuse of achinistrative controls.
~~
l J
The controls and procedures in existence at the time
~
the coatings were applied appear to be adequate both technically and administrative 1y to produce proper applications.
Inadequate supervision and QC verification of what appeared to be a mundane task are the root factors in this occurrence.
Corrective measures to preclude recurrence must, therefore, a
include a combination of increased procedural stringencies and increased personnel attention and knowledge.
Measures to enhance personnel use of procedures have been initiated since the January and June,1983 timeframe when the North Anna 1 and 2 containment ducts were painted (respectively).
However, the more complicated control systems and heavy use of
~
contractors by EAC at North Anna dilute the onsite
_t enhancement effort for this group.
The reliance upon QC/QA to conduct management supervision of work being perfomed reduces their effectiveness as an objective verification agent.
It is questionable whether QC was even knowledgeable of the North Anna painting effort, when it occurred.
Conversely, line-management supervision may have been 1
lacking because of the assumption of QC coverage.
.j 2.2 Surry There is no indication that unqualified paint has been applied to any surfaces inside either Surry unit containment.
Stringent controls maintained by the onsite contractor have alleviated YEPC0 staf f from the necessity for any station control program until recent cleanup efforts prompted Station Maintenance Services to paint portions of the Auxiliary Building.
Station Controls have been developed since June, 1984, and appropriate qualification requirements and procedures have been initiated, but are not yet complete.
2-1 N
EXHitilT7 of M Pages pge
I
,l 2.0 EXECUTIVE SIM4ARY 1
I
?
2.3 Overview Although coating application *nrograms are different between surry ano-N5rth Anna, their respective-l control systems appear to be adequate on paper.
Implementation of the revised programs needs to include appropriate degrees of training to workers, I
supervisors, and QA/QC personnel to assure correct utilization. Based on past experience specific management attention may be necessary to assure il adequate implementation.
Associated programs including Consumables Controls, 1
Akinistrative Procedure Implementation, and Evaluation of Safety-Related Activities, also require further review by VEPC0 to preclude similar errors in other areas of maintenance and modification work.
1
]
!]
!1
- 1 0
J
- J 2-2 EXHlBf,26 fI _atf page, p
Page o
I P.00T CAUSES I.
Directly Involved in North Anna Coating App 1tcation Errors: 1983 Personnel failure to use existing procedures and painting gl specifications;
,y Lack of an effective evaluation of safety-related activity on a Fk non safety-related component; Lack of supervisory direction and control; Lack of Quality Control verification of control; Incorrect / inadequate documentation of work; h
Insufficient definition of work requested.
I II. Program Difficulties That May Be Associated at North Anna l
Lack of controls for work conducted using a Blanket Work Order; Consumable qualification data difficult to find by users; Contractor supervision in EAC not knowledgeable of control programs at the nuclear site; Responsibilities in review and approval processes not clear and misinterpreted; Administratise burden on Shift Supervisors dilutes their technical evaluation capabilities.
9
(
J f
FIGURE 2-1
(
EXHIBIT,16.,
Page 1, ofE pages
. m :. m,. >.:y..:.,. ~;.r.} @ \\ ' :.., <.'s..:'.;. c.:.. [ :..,...
, a.-
~.
.2
3.0 ASSESSMENT
TECHNIQUE.
m
....,T.
t
-:a P A 1.s
,. g.4 7 f,
g v. 2 -
e
- \\..
%,.,._.g
.i '. '.. 3_
-u
...w
.g..
..,"g./
,2*-
'.Q...
'. -*' g;' r w,,.y
. n e, -
-.7
- s. - -
3 y,..,-.7,.
c- -n, o;
... -; g.
4
,, -. ~
~
s.
., s..
s
.-o-
.w
,.a.
.f.
s-
.4,,.
.-)...,.
..; c
......s
.g
.s.
s,,
a,.-
-r a
4 s:. <
~
.s.,
......p
..a
.....g**.
.ge,..,.
.s e
6,,
4
.<e.
6 a.
..s..s s.
- ,...,.q.
.g.
g
,, q
.,.., K....j. g.,. t. e,. t..
..y.,,t.,
t
,y 4.
- ,.-e
.s
.....3s.
....r..
s.
e
+.%...N... v.;
- 3..
..c
. e.
3
.c..-
4...
e,..x,.
s r. 3.,..,.,, s.. a.,.,. 3., ;
a g,,4...
aq... -
-.,. %,.r. $.,.
e
, s,...a,s.. y== 3,.
c 5,
4.
-.s. ;6,q 4 *,7. y W '. *.- 4** s p.. gs,.=ga
!? c
- A.
4'. r. *4
-*,.,....- N...f-
..,; T.r. ?-
ss
.s A
- s p.
n f,c,,g.i,.:v. y. ;p,- s.*g.-c,,, 4 e '.
p g,.
'%.t.> q..- c a,.,.c 3, *y...
..-*=.*e,
' f.* ;
g_,., i.,== s., s..
,f-,,-
gieg
.,,.,.y..A.,.g +, y.
p.
P g
e4 *
(? 'q.*=ty'.da
- 05.-
s,b y.,..*
s
.e, geh'.
5eb" 9
- - ; & -* h). ~. 's* r @b '#
'g. ;W.,{... ff. [$.4 *,p.
O-
+
4.'*.; *
- l ; N'.*s/ee'N..*. *, -A 44,
's
...v.
-- T.b ? - ' ' '
3 M4' p
.'n1...,. '.G.n,} *p(,.'y:.~ '.-r a W.q'
- u,<.,1*;,<f' ;.4 r.: w
- e-m.
..c,.,;
v
.t ; :I.:._q ;,- w,. -s y:.;J.
.@f.c*i;i ' r t e.-
n..,1; - m.,.
...g y * +. 4-v, p
g 'i *:. s %.,.A,.
a.
., f.
- p~..
s os.
, i; - f 3 --
,. [4 e
?
,,.5
,5 f.
3
..s 3.. _., a...., ;.,;.
, =
,gs,
-> s.. }
~
It. g. * *(,'m' *** w t
"**'. ~...... ~a. y l
- s
... _,.,..w.,
,~J.
/.,,
. g -. *.."P...
.,d 4,
- S. d, 4 a.*[='.*- *
- 65.
..,. ~.7., a y
'.?
. c
.J L..f-.
4 -. g., g 3 ;
t, g
J., g.., f,.; e-(, Y.T**N ';*....g} ) s y.tz..d s (J
- "4
.:,,; p *.
+,.j.2_ %,
g-
. w. 3...-
- .4
- 3. p,. 9.,; %,p 4.,3,*,,
4,, Q, 3 e
.e r..,
.,9,
.e.,,,.
.'i
. g -g
,. f
- 7. s..,. -, s, s.
8 3
'9
- -. p, )
L,
+
4
.r
.r.
- e..
r.
...e.,..,..... f..,
..g...
....s.-. - -
g,. -
a-
,..r.,..-
.s*
.s..
-.y.
.t e..
4.,
..s.
i:
aq -
.~~2*
. Q,
.. *.k.. ;..
.?-
. e f
% ;......e.* 3.
6.
- y*
- - '*..l-
- ...':' {.
. r r,.. ', -
',a e
r..
,.,.s..,
e
.g s.
u...
+.
- ~
,g g.
,y
...y. -
9
\\
I
(
i i
3.0 ASSESSMENT
TECHNIQUE ol i
Mr. E. H. Webster of Impell Corporation conducted the assessment of the VEPCO control programs involved in coating applications at the North Anna and Surry Power Stations. The scope of the assessment is defined in Figure 3-1 and was conducted August 13-24, i
l 1984.
During the period August 14-15, the consultant I
interviewed North Anna management personnel at the l
Plant site. Copies of the documentation which describe the ductwrk painting operations in 1983 were obtained (see Appendix A). From this and g
discussions with Station, QA, and ESC management, the scenario of events in 1983 was developed and the affected programs and procedures identified and obtained (see Appendix B).
The consultant analyzed this data to detemine practical application, adequacy of controls, and, t
finally, root causes associated with the improper coating application. Since North Anna Station management had already drafted revised coating controls (see Appendix C), these were also obtained and assessed.
]
On August 16, the consultant visited Surry Power Station, where copies of their applicable control i
programs were obtained (see Appendix D). The ir in-house evaluation was reviewed and appeared to be a thorough analysis of the existing program.
, q 1 '
Differences between the North Anna and Surry control systems were discussed with both Station management l
organizations and detemined to be minor.
During the week of August 20, the consultant
- l completed his analysis of the programs associated I
with coating controls and developed the reconnendations in Section 6.0 of this report.
These recomendations were discussed with Station j
management representatives on August 22 and 23 and finalized in report form on August 24, 1984.
I i
I EXHIBIT. 26 3 -1 Page of pages
l IN-CONTAINMENT PAINTING CONTP.0LS ASSESSMENT IMPELL, INC.
Scope:
1.
Activities to be conducted in the assessment of in-containment painting administrative controls include:
l Evaluation of station (North Anna & Surry) reviews and corrective actions taken or planned.
Identification of additional reviews and corrective actions that may be needed.
Documentation of the reviews, findings, corrective actions, and assessment in package form, ensuring both Surry 8 North l
Anna control programs are addressed.
2.
Activities to be conducted based on the result of Item 1 above include:
Identification of other potential problem areas within maintenance, operations, projects, etc. that should be I
reviewed.
I APPROVED:
I I
1 t
I I
f ll i
FIGURE 3-1
{
Page 1 of 2 EXHlBIT,76 %
l Page A of 2 s
- p.,
l l
l Action:
Task Date k.
Item Resp.
Completed 1.
Collect copies of documents and EW 8/15 instructions / controls affected l
2.
Evaluate failure mechanisms EW 8/15 j
which allowed incorrect paint use 1
3.
Document findings and portry EW 8/16 root causes 4.
I Assess root causes as to impact on EW 8/16 other " skill of the craf t" areas 5.
Develop corrective measures to be MLB & HLM input / 8/22 l
implemented to preclude recurrence t.HW 6.
Document the project work, results EW 8/16 and actions to be taken 1
1
]
I) i
]
J 1
l l
l J
FIGURE 3-1 Page 2 of 2 l
EXHIBIT 26 %
Page 4 of If Pages t
l 4.0 SCENARIO LEADING TO THE NORTH ANNA DIFFICULTIES In June,1982, Maintenance Requests (MRs) were originated to paint the ductwork in the basement of Unit 1 and, separately, Unit 2 containments, to arrest rusting and stains on the ductwork which had resulted from small boric acid leaks in the primary systems. Each of these requests were approved for conduct by Site Construction utilizing a Blanket Work Order in place between Station Maintenance and PIP-N.
4.1 Unit 1 In December,1982, the station turned over the Unit 1 painting authorization to PIP-N.
On December 23, the effort was initiated and the Construction Supervisor identified the paint systems and surface preparation specifications to be utilized for this work utilizing QCI 11.1 foms. There is no evidence that QC was infomed of the work nor any documentation to verify the preparation or paint system actually used. The primer selected, Mobil Chromax Red 13-R-50 was not qualified per Painting Specification NAS-1016, and purchase records for the site indicate this paint was never purchased.
Further, the SP-10 surface finish called for was not physically obtainable with a grinder (as called for).
The work was documented through February 1,1983 and closed as completed on February 14, 1983 by PIP-N.
4.2 Unit 2 In March,1983, the station turned over the Unit 2 painting authorization to PIP-N.
The work was accepted by PIP-N in April,1983 and work comenced on April 19, 1983.
The paint system selected for this effort was Keeler Long 6548 white primer and white topcoat. The surface preparation was specified as SP-10 using a vacuum blast.
Although Keeler Long is qualified for containment use, the acceptability for application on a c
galvanized finish was based on a phone call to the vendor and was never substantiated. The surface 1
j preparation is not credible in that VEPC0 does not own a vacuum blast system, would not sandblast in containment and could not attain an SP-10 finish on
,l f
the thin duct sheet metal.
N Documentation indicates that the job progressed y[
through May 1,1983 and was closed on the MR on July 21,1983.
EXHIBIT 16
[
Page
- M of ]I Pages r
1.
c ta r
j
.s i
5.0 -OBSERVATIONS 1
3
.u e
g i,....., s x - y j
%' 2.' ;.j.,. ".-s y a e.4 *. '... _
. w._ _,:...- _.
..p.~....S n :.
c
.f..
4
____,,.,.......-,_r.v==.
t c
e,
,s..,....
[
...... a.
s l
j
.......+,..
.n p
.m.
., i.. ;.. a._q... s.,.,... ; -
g :.
s,- :..,.
- as'. <;..,.~..
c.
- g. :n.,.... ~..,, -
- n... e,1...'., i..
.: 7
. ~..,.
.s.,...,.,
w%.e
... g....
a.
.s
_?. :y % ;g
. y
- s.c. ',,.. ? i.\\
- y
,p. ?..
isp.42w$, $;.. ;.
.'v i : : n. ~.... ~~ '. ;p...;:.'z'5. L; y?.. ' : !.". f'. :
s b.
,.:n....
V 3 p;W.h,,f
,.M o..',.E'Y.'v.1 C a 2[. $.i ~',2,,ll '4.*D. /
j..h ;.. :'.,..
(
...L.
- M.d 5,l. M_%l.15..
.s... r.. s.:t.~ ? ! O i';n :. #'! "*..
..l ~~
- d
*, #.h.
' P.,;. J", i. ;
,L -
s
.. s.4.
e
p v
. 5; *sJr,;g.
JC lO P'.e 3 9 -:,.2 *, 'yQ'f.l..*l(. f. ;.'.,N, w,. '4 8 -2 4
} Q 'Q ('7.
.s j
..s 7.. ' ' %
..m. ..
%v. :s.*y v.. '
-c
~~h*Gr* o, ;'3;,I ~.,<:?,V
?,-@,,' ;j. } le.h,.,
- b$. ;.
. ai.2.~^,. % d.,9../,Y,...i'h.,
- u.'.....
s
.e
<*c-s
.s.
- . y 2.f
- * 4*S. s. ?;.
.M.g E.k.
i
.l ;
.L( '
er skin'j.Y l $,g'.. L,;,7 '.. b... -
W. ;f..:v ..
4 k.1,*....,S&s. ;p. -
94>%. f.,,'t, n.M.,. Vt 4,7 '.A
+-
.v
. ~...,..
.......n.
.y a.,..
.-..t.
..a.*'*,.,..,.
...m..,. v.,..
........,s...:.."., y is;......1..,,.... c.
s v. a. 3..
s 3
.. s, a =cz..,. y..c.~w
.v
,t.
w.
n_.
.....v~
..s..,.
_ 4
- l
.. x,....,
.m.s...
i p ;.s.
l
.e c.
.w.,. a..
%......~ ?
-. 4.. -
,.e ;s {.< --.......
a..c
- e.. x...............
s I
..,-1.
I
~
l If u
l c
w EXHIBIT.U i
Page d f of I Pages s
l
._m_
l
)
5.0 OBSERVATIONS C
4 i
i The consultant's review of existing control programs at North Anna and Surry Power Stations resulted in 1
observations which depict specific facts or errors portrayed in the documentation and from interviews.
's The observations were condensed and grouped according J
to direct or indirect involvement in the 1983 ductwork painting errors at North Anna. A third group of observations were developed regarding Surry
]
controls to compare and verify adequate program control s.
]
These findings form the basis of the Root Cause detennination, the results of which are presented in Figure 2-1.
]
5.1 North Anna Ductwork Painting: Direct Involvement abservations 1)
The utilization of a Maintenance Request (MR) in
}
each case for this work was an error since this work constituted a modification. As a result:
J No evaluation was perfortned in accordance with 10CFR50.59.
No in-depth engineering evaluation of qualified surface preparation and coating
~
system was conducted.
~
2)
The MRs both denoted the work as not safety-related since the components involved (ventilation ducting) are classified as nonsafety-related.
As a result:
~
QC/QA was not notified of the work prior to ordering accomplishment.
QC signatures for document completion were gained apparently after the work was complete.
~
No documentation directing the use of QCI i
11.1 nor NAS 1016 was made.
3)
Paint and surface preparation specifications were not fully in accordance with NAS 1016.
5-1 EXHIBIT. t 6 %
Page 1o11 Pages
~
tJ
l 5.0 OBSERVATIONS I
I In the Unit 1 case, the Paiftting Specification (NAS 1016) was clearly not l
utilized.
In the Unit 2 case, it appears the Spec.
was consulted, but that the application I
qualification was not fully substantiated.
4)
Surface preparation specifications could not, I
have been met based on engineering evaluation of tools available, duct wall thickness and time required.
I 5)
The paint primer specified for Unit 1 was not utilized.
Purchase records show that this paint (Chromax) was never purcht. sed or batched for tif t 1 and 2.
Records indicate a Cheesman/Debevoise Deveka No. 505 was on hand and batched in the December,1982 timeframe. This paint I
is also an alkalyd base but equivalency to Mobil Otromax 13R-50 is not established.
6)
The construction supervisor responsible for identifying preparation specifications and coating specifications is no longer employed by 1
- YEPCD,
~
]
7)
Documentation for the work does not specify that 3
the surface was galvanized, nor does it specify the surface area intended to be covered.
c 8)
Records indicate that only 17 gallons of Deveka No. 505 were batched in the affected timeframe which is not sufficient to have primed the j
entire surface. 111 gallons of topcoat were batched.
4 ia EXHIBIT,. Ib,,,es 5-2
,,, g i g g,,,
L
5.0 OBSERVATIONS O
5.2 North Anna Ductwork Painting: Indirect Involvement Observations:
1)
The Consumables Control Program implemented in 1983 has created a data base which is difficult to access by worters.
An extremely large number of consumables have been qualified by EWR subsequent to the program implementation. 1.istings of these consumables and their appropriate qualification have never been incorporated into the prsgram aministration.
Consumable Controls to assure shelf life, service life, and in the case of coatings, operating (pot) life, were frequently mentioned as missing from the existing program.
2)
Plant modifications as defined in Administrative Procedure 3.7 may be instituted by Design Change l
Package (DCP) of Engineering Wort Request (EWR).
Both DCP and ENR programs appear to afford sufficient controls to assure proper reviews of the modification.
Maintenance Requests are not an authorized i
mechanism to affect modifications, but there appear to be no controls to screen out requests (MR or WO) which result in modifications.
3)
Review signatures are required for all documentation involved in design, modification, and maintenance controls.
Most personnel contacted expressed the belief that a QC signature indicated in-depth technical, akinistrative and safety verification of the document and its associated work / operation.
n EXHIBIT. I k 5-3 i
Page.fl of I I Pages e--
+
,-wt--
-w
-e- - - - - --
,y,,
y,--r--%m.v.
l 5.0 OBSERVATIONS I
QA/QC expressed a contrasting view that many of their document signoffs only verify l
that the documentation has been completed properly.
Shift Supervisor approval is required on 1
all documents affecting the plant. Due to the volume of documents involved, the value of this approval is anticipated to be 1
limited to safety evaluation at best, although many personnel believed that this included technical approval also.
4)
Programatic controls utilizing procedures to implement each program have been instituted to meet regulatory requirements and properly
]
operate, maintain and modify the plant and associated systems.
)
Apparently because of the sequence of development of construction-related procedures, some confusion was expressed
,]
regarding which procedures Construction is required to use. (PMP, SOP, ADM)
Since Construction supervision below Superintendent level is primarily filled by contractors and little or no training is given these people outside of (AIT, weakness in procedural compliance is to be expected unless VEPCO direct supervision is maintained.
Complacency and/or lack of knowledge of controls established by Administrative i-Procedures was expressed as a concern by several managers.
5) 10CFR50.50 reviews are instituted in the controls for DCPs, EWRs, end temporary changes.
I EXHIBIT 26-5-4 l]
Page 4 of I Pages
5.0 OBSERVATIONS O
Controls in the above named programs appear to be adequate.
Maintenance Requests, when annotated nonsafety-related, non-Tech. Spec., do not I
Maintenance which impacts safety-related get screened for 10CFR50.59 review.
equipment could, therefore, proceed without review.
5.3 Surry Power Station 1)
Painting conducted in containment at Surry prior to 1984 appears to have been conducted by the l
onsite contractor, Daniel, using Procedure WP 114.
>]
2)
The Maintenance Services Group at Surry has J
conducted aesthetic painting outside ccntainment and is now controlled by Administrative Procedure ADM 102.
3)
Station evaluation of existing controls has already identified weaknesses and enumerated corrective actions to revise ADM 102, QCI 10.10 and develop MSP procedures to increase the amount of painting Maintenance Services can perfonn.
4)
A review of the sampling by Station management of previous design changes, including
- ,;j installation of ductwork in containment, reveals no unqualified coating utilization.
This review also included a review of the paint applied by Maintenance Services on the liner basement, inside containment.
5)
Paint is stored in two locations. The warehouse supporting Construction Stores " CAT I" paint, another station warehopse stores paint which is i
not vendor certified.
d 1
l 5-5 EXHIBIT. !6 %
Page If._of M pages
s,
- w.c a w. -
.,: ~,
' 6.0 RECOP9tENDATIONS. ~
f i ' '.;. J..' i..
f * <. s
<. - e
'.f J r* A ' **.,
, Ig ?.' ', ' .u ** --
--a.a
=.
a.-
.v ey
~'
a f.. e,e.N. < > <.,t.' e, *,.*f* - - - -, -
. 7 pr,. - -
- ;-W-,
v **7 '* **
- g.,
,A sg.,
... -.. - t. p..,. a. t -.
-,s s
v s
p Z.,,. c.
- 4..,
s p
4
. -, -a
'r
...,a
. s,
,4
. 4
- u. -..
s.
5
. y.m, %., v..
.,A, v,.. v
. 4.s.
s* +
r
- ?
~-.. :
..m v;.
L'..
~L.
- r..1...;..
- ..... g. ~ ;t s,..
'. '.. ;=. =. {:~. ?.r.
z.
r'.~.
4-w.
'. *t
?
t-b.f
- s
- i..a.,..
..s.
a.
.s...v.
.. f. %.
.,,. g, * < )d m.
w.e c,:,..
,e-
'e
~~.>G.", %f ['.. l ' '? I%'-:ff :3 '}.i.
e.,--
..t s.
L.
2.-
~.
-. s.. a..,W* ' ' > ' '..
s-y2
. - ~
,~.
. ?'. R
.h. * -
,51,:Q X. 7, T
- i..
. < 7 :.b. -.*."N.;.?.~.:
.. w* *. ~....-
P-
-N C-
>4.
. u&,,4.p. w=.9 g =y n...:O..*%.
m.
N we. a.
e-
=
. a.e*.,.*
a
.'i -
p.
'.Y
<lt ' 'Y' Y. RA*
\\.' aN 4 ! *4f,w.. t,.,. l - ;$. n'*'h..' '. N -- :...u,.*.Y.$..?s0*.& f '
.~. h,{
.x;
,1:!,..
L
~
- r-
. ;~.- -
.s
- s
~
a n v.
.. w.
y ;,y.n.:.~.
';'*g;:4.,..
,.3'. ~ s..
- 4., j *.- y T. t, p,',
.y
- p....
v.
~.x-
...,, g :. ;...>
..., - +-
t.
c.
~
~~
.w., v r
'*h !.5h:
} e.:s..'
?
2 t. %..~. m'
,' 4
...s. M Q s. 9. c,,,.
- .v.,.1
. wey. :.' : 4.... o... s !.. T w., *. ~.M:f. > T,; +..*.,1
- v. n
^
4
.: y -.p... g.. -~~
o.
9v.*.
- '
- 7: -
a S
.. :.g e
-. %a,,. -
-.i.(..ps*...
- z..k.. ',3.<,. r,y.
s,:.
g;.
.. e.-
. :,.p s.
-. x.
..w.
.?-
.~
s.s.s
.4 3-
- p r,
,2,-
.g
.. 3,
,. ?.
~
- v.. x: - 4 s.79. -
..g
.. p.
~. -
.;.~...
i.
,. :.r r -.:
<2 p.....,..
.\\.
... 2... '..z o+.
. <.;.,r.. s..O. c...,...
~-.
.L..
- .?
s 6d>.. e t: 2. _*..p p=V_
.a
~.,.....
.a.*.
- t
.~-
- 1 f.c.w -;,..
'l t
..s.
s EXHIBIT. t 6 Page b1 n ges a
6.0 RECOPMENDATIONS Based on the observations and root causes identified by the consultant, the following general recomendations were developed to provide Virginia Electric and Power Company with the long-tem corrective measures to preclude future coating 1
corrective actions comf tments.
application errors.
Items identified by an asterisk
(*) have alreatty been addressed by station originated 6.1 Both Stations 1)* Implement controls for the selection of surface preparation and coating applications which reference existing Painting Specifications.
there coating of in-containment surfaces or safety-related equipment is involved, secondary evaluation and verification controls involving Quality Control personnel should be specified and documented.
2)* Conduct training for maintenance and applicable construction personnel including supervisors on the coating difficulties that occurred at North Anna, the hazards of coating misapplication, and the controls established to assure correct applications.
l-3)
Establish system interaction and design basis knowledge at the ESC supervisory and SEO personnel level to develop increased engineering sensitivity.
4)
Provide continuing training on station adninistrative controls with emphasis on specific review and approval responsibilities involved in existing programs.
- 5) Clarify line-management and QA/QC roles and S
responsibilities to assure objective verification processes exist.
- 6) The mechanisms authorized to request coating i
applications should be controlled as potential i
c modifications and should specify surfaces to be j
coated:
(
q d
6-1 EXHIBIT. 26 ~.
Page D oL I I. Pages
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 1
Area to be coated, identifying boundaries Existing surface material to be coated Reason for coating (e.g.:
rust, abrasion, appearance)
- 7) Upgrade existing consumables controls:
to provide a comprehensive listing of qualified materials and qualified applications; to control consumables once issued to the field to assure traceability.
8)
Review and revise existing EAC instri.ctions to provide a single integrated set of controls for each site-specific organization.
9)
Review the Shift Supervisor akinistrative workload and adjust as necessary to assure responsibilities can be met.
6.2 North Anna Power station 1)* Detemine and control the involvement of Station Maintenance Department in coating application.
2)
Establish and enforce controls of the Blanket Work Order between Maintenance and Construction to assure coating controls and documentation.
3)
Establish and maintain a minimum knowledge level l
by Construction Supervisors of nuclear plant control and ahinistrative systems.
6.3 Surry Power Station 1)* Complete the. administrative controls and procedures to be used by Maintenance Services to apply coatings, and implement a qualification program for those personnel involved in surface preparation and coating applications.
2)* Implement controls to specify the types of coating application for which Maintenance Services and the onsite contractor are qualified and authorized to conduct.
6-2 EXHIBITM Page U of Pages
t 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 1
.1 3)* Verify that paint specifications which originate from the original Surry Paint Specification for in-containment applications include DBE evaluation.
A t
d 4
c.
4 EXHIBIT 24%
6-3
)
Page I Y ot 1 Pages
s..
.e.,
}..
s
?
s
...... -y.....t...,,-.r.
6.
.+ 5 7
2 s.
t s
.i.
.4.
.i
- r.
1
.6
.t.
g g...... _
J..
va-py.y,
.s..
..r.- : -
a, 6
.. d ' J.'
- L.
.......y s
y, ). -. ;,.p,4..-, 7,,..
- 4;...,,,.,. :8 7
-.6.
g
- . p.-
2
..!.,.4;.,a, g 4 '.
- g,
.t.
_. - :.:,..... t, g. ---.;.., -
.,..e e
g 9;!. -
..yu. - t6. -
, ]' *.
.s..
.t
-g,
,,Y,
..3
.... -. L m.,.a....m*. *,..
.f *,,,
.,P, g-
...a....,,.
e..
w w..".. Ff..w, 6'
,. g
.. v. t. q.
g r.
+vse
... w,
. n... w. =. ~..
g k
.t D r; ggt. r.. Nv.+s. /' I.T.,R,'.ir.$. '. r,N.w. qty $.t:w n.s u 1....
.i
.re.. m: J-r -.~' ry;.c.7.'W.5. 2 0..:'5.,. i..
- ".."..' W
. i.e.d..... w.-!A
.. o s
+,
& L_.':..>y; &.:i.M W D,/ b M ?.._ m.-s. M...
2... O,. f. %... i:'i~-..
.P.
!ff '.e
.. J... 'a. P..t W.;.w. :.,e.~.:.
's,,.!e. :.*.5.. %_, C... =.f&m..N.;-h.A t L..c.,..,, c.. :.
r
- f.,..p : 7 ~,i., p? Q'::,*:.,- -. t, L
- y -,. _
Corpersse Offseei..-::::
.e
- n-
. :),
.O:
,., 3:
. s,~p 220 Montgomery street a m.
3.- >N :..,. e. v..p... ;. y y.
. r.
.R.n. :r..e u.;..?,4..a..; '.f..: :$,.y -.... r.
-.L L..
.i
~
San Fran.ci.s.co, CA 94104. :...*.. :,...
p.
s.
.r i
Domestic Offlees 7
't
~
350 Lennon Lane T
Walnut Creek, CA 94506...e --...
.....+4 U. W, ' > p.
c... 3,... c r- - =.
<':e.*
g.,..,
.r
- -- r. m.
y,;.,3,,i:j{.,J.'..
- o p,, r..
2333 Wauk'ogan Road',, o e%
.~.
2 2;,.45.;..MJeum.IL_0001M,,;.j,jg,r
/
..., { '.
., Q $,gj Q ;g" 1;[d d']d i 1,y g.*;
. h - A s W /,' ',
.j'
,3
, ;,,,,7.
rt; y gsg,ggi.is go.p w w 4. g,. 29.. a,lpe:.3.m,,,
.,s go...5, g.re.- = r,
" p.. -
.,.r s,..
- '. v.......MoMIle, N.Y.11747. '-f,i.
@. ; s.. m m
... e. -, ;. S. f... - Q.... a
,a r. '. ;c.' M...
- c.4.~.
333 Research Coistt'.W'-@n. g n-,.,...
v.. ; d.1.i...;,.
.. :a 4~
s.,
- l. -QL s.
3
,} a 4, - Technology Park /Atlantaf.gefq y. ;ph h,:l- :L'.*.,M h,,,,,k:'.'M. r.,- O A.-.
.w n
u
..L..
m
.m; e
. g,;g,gg,l.Q, h, p, 3 s..s; -
,, *!lV r
- f.,.- :
Norcrossi GA 30002. - 4. r -
. V - n-... Q C.
- h e. i 4 P. t -l. t. -
~.
i i>,, i...~
. t ' ".
Insernational Officoe. :... i...'.,.
- cc
..%
- L. 3..T, /.. 7,:. :
./. >-.
c.
, t.., s,, t -i..t
..A 3..
5
....2_.,
' ' - ;r. y -- - - r -,..,..., >.-. g ;
- e.
x r..... i g-.
Genesis Centre, Garrett Field
't'
'.*f
.d t
Birchwood,Warrington.
?:
e,.
s WA3 78H
?
'i-.2 0? ' t J.d !.'.f " - P & f
~ -
United Kingdom 6
- 10. Rue du Colisee
~
5-75008 Paris i
r France Rheinstrasse 19 r
~
'..L..
. - ~-
6200 Wiesbaden
.~ s.r, ta r
r -
r-West Germany t
I d
a Affiliate Company Progest S.p.A. (Fiat TTG)"
f -
t
- g @ y L Pages 7
Via Cuneo 21 10152 Torino, staty Pag
POW 3b-18
%..oroisono MEMORANDUM To A. D. Fraley, Jr.
North Anna FROM C. C. Ludden October 15,1984 HISTORY OF RING DUCT C0ATINGS UNIT I AND 11 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION As requested, we have assembled doumentation to support the coating sequences for the ring ducts on North Anna Units I and II.
The Protective Coating Surface Preparation Records (PCSPR) for the two units are shown in Attachments 1 and 2.
Although these records are complete, questions have been raised regarding the actual primer used in Unit 1 and the type of surface preparation actually performed.
SURFACE PREPARATION Each PCSPR indicates that an SP-10 surface was to be obtained in pre-paration for primer coating.
Unit I records indicate that a grinder was used; Unit 2 records indicate that the surface was vacuum blasted.
Although SP-10 is a specification for sandblasting; it is common industry practice to quote an SP standard when using other types of surface prepara-tion.
The SP-10 notation would indicate prepararion of the surface by the specified means to a cleanliness equivalent to that obtained by an SP-10 bladt.
Thus, there is no conflict on the Unit 1 PCSPR's regarding that point.
The vacuum blasting indicated on the Unit 2 records could not have been accomplished as North Anna does not have vacuum. blasting equipment and does not allow blasting of any type in containment."
Discussions with Vepco construction and painting shop personnel indicate that the following surface preparation technique was used for both Units 1 and 2.
Hand held grinders were used to prepare areas of boric acid corrosion and the remaining surface was hand sanded to a cleanliness equivalent to SP-10, as described above.
UNIT 1 PRIMER IDENTIFICATION Although the Unit 1 PCSPR's indicate that Mobil Chromox Primer Red 13-R-50 was used, there is substantial evidence to show that Dereka Prin.er Red No. 505 was actually used.
First.
indicated that Mobil Chromox Primer has,a review of station purchasing records not been purchased by the station (Attachment 3).
Second, discussions with Vepco construction and painting shop personnel indicate that Dereka No. 505 was used, Finally, a review of painting shop batch records (Attachment 4) indicates that Dereka No. 505 was batched and used during the period the ring duct was costcJ.
Both the Mobil Chromox and the Dereka No. 505 coatings are alkyd based primers.
Infrared spectroscopy performed on coating scmples taken from the Unit I duct show that the primer was alkyd based, consistent with the Mobil or Dereka primer (Attachement 5).
EXHIBIT 27-Page
/
of 1 Pages
4 Pega 7 Octcb::r L 15,1984; HISTORY OF RING DUCT COATINGS I
i d4 George C. Ludden GCL/smb Attachments cc: J.R. Locklar FB-6 H.J. Fortune, Jr. EB-9 R.B. Green EB-7 R.M. Berryman EB-3
.~
f 9
37 pfge 1-N8"
MTTE NHC A/T 3 MEMORANDUM Mr. A. D. Fraley, Jr.
North Anna Purchasing To FROM K. V. Cummings October 15, 1984 PURCHASE OF MOBIL 13-R-50 Purchasing was asked to determine if in fact we had purchased any Mobil 13-R-50 in the year 1982. We conducted a review of all orders placed with Mobil or Mobil distributors for the time frame in question.
No such purchase was found on either the Construction or Operations side.
To verify our findings, Mobil Chemical Company was also contacted and asked to research their records since all purchasing at that time was not done on site. Their records did not indicate that Mobil 13-R-50 was provided to Vepco's North Anna site.
Investigations did reveal that Mobil has supplied on two occasions Mobil 13-R-53.
However both shipments totaled only fifteen (15) gallons.
. The purchase orders involved were NA3-4667 dated September 28,1982, for ten (10) gallons and purchase order number NA3-2516 dated February 22, 1982, for five (5) gallons.
'. V-
~
s K. V. Cummings Supervisor Purchasing t
(
C EXHIBIT
~*
Page g. 28m g
i-I b
S s
4, a
w C'
i k
4 i
- e Y
g
-Q H%
$z~
N a
Q l R EC TlO N New Wood -
d, contents thoroughly
""k4 a ercc t
re and
(
wtpie using. Surface t.out be thor-Nt. t#
s 4,t'r,t
"."" 4'":i l P/
se pa nt, t
in we al e
6 id r g Kn t and sa y we I
'?
should oe sealed with r o.a4
'2 '
queJac.
,I c#
,k hr t ces or hen e te i materia sh id ts I a te ature of 70* f befo5e ing apphe i All defects in the ffAace shg.utd be -
L AUTION! COMBUSTIBLEI Keep a y from beat and open flom iS prolonged contact with sk a t:e r per y prir e or spot pe d
Lefore this product is apphed laid breathing of vapor or spro Do not take in (noll Close container of ter each usej
(
Ise only with odequate ve e
g Kt OUT Of REACH OF CHILORtN}
New concerte plaster, ett - gouk, be sea:ed with Latex Pri.
- Ma6er.
THE DEBEV0lSE NY BROD YN, N.Y.11232 4
,g
..' ou p-.. co, sb, z
.u
g..
...., y /. A is g e, pt-?.
M ar '4; 1 -- * -
.2 i
a
- e.
'" $. ~.[Q' 3y g
.)
~
- 3
.y..fg,)
?n..
h,,".. W;. f.
E
- ._f wi y
' e.edi n --
,\\
Y*., F. '- W 22T'E"d' h RJOSTRATE
,__ ARAthuh tems 1
.J '.
~
i y
/
sus er. N - 4 V
STEEL NM:YWYY$M. /FA tM Y8 N'M
~'@ ' M M'NS l 'M N XK heQ\\eER. Y Jk)~2 L%0fM kWY
'6 =% N '?&A
- s
.- w-rd _+
j CONCRETE
> F ti-4 c. M : #.
A. w c.
/ 3 7,'
n -s s
ANCHOR PATTERN:
DFACE $ SE OBTAINED _ 9/M s_
')
' ~
- P'N *
%CtJ :
r l
H f Q AG M.
&f&i
'iW.% Y:t * :-
' M '.4 O Y '.0 SWW hhqlEO. l h.1$
N%h $.M hl.TJ,RS.NQ7.YES DO
'NO
. GROUT FINISH:
M
[,*
, SANDPAPER TEXTURE:M
'THEY CHECKED REh.utMLM FOR'CiEANLINESS7 l Y.ES d,,:%.;.gw" ;
.t
.,q, v
.,c
- , - e, rA e<
7.m e. *
. '$0L. t.OWING D.%SEb?.
".w. mi -.qjt.
4w...
MLE19E AGENT 9:*-
FINAL CLEANING:. Q:
m# a MM/ HANDLING @DS:
' ; TYPE,
hDUSTED ' b VA M p.). y.1 N,, - ],' '-.[
e.n c
... a.-:
n
. f' -
7, f
A GEN, PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FINISH FINISH (X)AT TOUCH UP OTHER
- OC INSPECTOR
'/' f% f hL
- PAINTING SUPERVISOR
/ /k. w t
n.% a 0 Y
,,. m'.
W +*.
,s.
1
..1 s..
a f
bYh..
- $ bhO
.l 0 - f, ik QPr@ $ $}M t W t - D v.E W 3 d W W 7 @ Q
+
bh k kh IJ -2 * -
- /W~~. W ?/. F@ 1
.f1
.Tf.' V f
! h".s*'h
'Y Q M % ~W '., Q
' h GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT 1ST FINISH FINISH CDAT TOUCH 41P ' in@t
- dl kTE:D3 '
J -JJ"i T
/,J -)) - /Q 4 'a_. i$f.%-p # i
1 iAMBIENT TEMP. '-
ff
- a -
d'
. C '@ M+j c
- y_a
- '? '
s
~
AURFACE TEMP.
1'
-fo
- '?
-2C U1' E MlW'I O'3h % -
! DEW PONtT-
- If '.
~
/
- A*;'?
"';. P
'U' I;C.EL. NUMIDITY:
/ ) C/g
/
NM-J-
MTE:',
7 2. L T - 8 3, A-u J
'E
{PfLM THICKNESS 7
N/A O : O.: ;JJ 4~.
't f Ts I FF Ts J1]
p's WFTs D
>CEADINGS:
DFTs s
DFTs WFTs tWTs
's t
%BTAINED:
$16 $}UL(
N/A MIN.'40AX.
' 30tN. MAX.
MIN. 'bd MIN. MAX. -
N' ECIFIED:
IJ4 k.Ci
~ N/A bilN. WAX.
MIN. bMA)(
MIN. MAX.
MIN. MAX.
OEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT.
1ST FfMLSH Pue19400AT.cYOUCN(P-DTHER 3'lf 2
%~.
- i. T.ff'. r 3
s,.
~
Ep. DATE EXP.DATE 4XP. DATE HEXP.'DATE. TXP. DATE' EXP. DATE @
c.r v.;"
r.
~
f
- W' -
U fPAINT:
~ i ~d i -
_ iM [ ' Ih'; M^ ~ <- ~f.
Q' '.? 9
?
J.
m,
._s
~ SATCH NUMBERS
>n. m 3L 41 ACT:
EXP.DATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE EXP. D ATE EXP.DATE EXP. D ATE u.
- 3 APG*
APG*
APG*
APG*
APG*
APG*
REDUCER USED F
'~t COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COATING APPLIED
/
/:f.'*
R e
R Os OR
_O S YES YES YES YES TRIAL MIST YES
-OS S
S COATING EQUIP.
_O S
_O S YES DEMONSTRATION NO NO NO NO NO NO
-me
=-
APPLICATORS jYES YES YES YES YES YES OUAllFIED NO NO i NO NO NO NO PAINT CONTR ACT SUPV.
EXHlBlIJ o m CONSTR. SUPV.
Q __ / ad '[ g g
O. C. INSP.
j
- AMOUNT PER GALLON
@/@@U$M
$/SPWAV
- R / R O 0 0 - -- --- -- - --
. _;-fy.g ' :
- 4g. :
y %.c..
s-~
M mms.~.
,.c
- M'*M6i;9dfM "t&i%TO@ M 9
_, yr y. m;: 4.W ~'.s c VV, %Mp."
Mg Bgutpq 45 ',g$ER.
/y MRAM y' i
[9EA90N FOR PREPARATION ~g 7W r%,4 c. 'J 6
g Ag;,:j #ININI J.'
1.
M.fA'4,'1A24 T" - suit.D UP R PRitN000
" ~
1 a
T WE: ;*'. '
' M.W.
} $ f-$ '.'T^
C:l34~ V N*;
r. W:.
MASONRY i ] r..I
. 1 CONCRETE cMT NUMBER:
60A/
"r e
- '/9 J.-.
SHIFT:
i-ANCHOR PATTERN:
LSUXFACE TO BE OSTAINED.
7'70 s
?]
~
f.
f.
SAT, UNS. SAT. UNS. SAT. UNS.lSAT. UNS, SAT. UNS. SAT. UNS. OSTAINED: /* O f.
'SU7. FACE PREPARATION tv h
64 4 ' j..s r.
,)
d w
-. [a?
- i'*" '
'SPECIFIED: / O
- f.3 ~
(METHOO OF ' SURFACE PREP:
- /*, J n ? ?- '
, WERE t'ATER. AAD Olt FILTERS USEDE YESh' C.;..
4-GROUT FINISH:
Yd WER.E THEY. CHECKED flEGU,L.ARLY FOR Ct EA.NLINESS?. n ~
.,ES...n..,NO' ' b.,
SANDPAPER TEXTURE:#5' /
Y T dM,.'
y n.
g'WEEE THE' FOLt.DWING USED7 - Vf,R; a w
.;.w FORM RELEdiE AGENTS?
TYPE TMNA'L CLEANING:
.,p
- t p-;; < : -
- < ;4,
g g
2
,5 DUSTED V
t a
GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER PAINTING SUP'ETIVISOR
/../4_ @#'
)
QC INSPECTOR 1.'*,**,"*"^"*l,'"""_*';h. V'*;$U. 2 / 4
.fA //v 7.d(>-; (.Je9 Acie 7 f.':m, r
-, v
.,~ r-
!?}b/?
"&.~, *.h :;., O C.
{~
/?/- l W -
~:
p,
.-u y,-
c ;
- = -
^^
- p, y
Y W _ W f-(.Lj.l.O Ol' t $Wl-(//-$. 21., 3 bl.jpg. bh 'N] $ ,3 GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCH UP ' dTHER' t MATE:. /. T. ff [ AMBIENT ' TEMP ' (7 & *,' I i I.JURFACE TEMP. (, f
- f DE!1 POINT:
2/ 7 " { REL HUMIDITY: 3 M-- - ~ ! DATE: /. 6. I' 2., [ FILM THICKNESS C- 0 N/A DO R 0 0 0 C:EADINGS: DFTs WFTs MTs 'WFTs M s WFTs - s WFTs DFTs WFTs i OBTAINED: )lM. M .N/A MIN. MAX. MIN.' - MAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. I SPECIFIED: M. @ N/A MIN. RU)M, ' MIN. ~ MAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. GEN. PRit41NG SEAL COAT ; IST FINI'S"H FINISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER h EXP. DATE EXP.' OATE f.XP. DATE .EXP. DATE EXP.DATE EXP. DATE [ iPAINT:
- f.~
-M I' y ~ _d W ' i.,,. , N.- 8ATCH NUMBERS F S - O'Ul i* ACT: EXP.DATE EXP. DATE EXP.DATE EXP. D ATE EXP.DATE EXP. DATE "3 I? APG* APG* APG* APG* APG* APG* ) REDUCER USED , r y, e <, y r / '.j,, ', COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COATING APPLIED ,.,.c- @B @R B OR Os R e R e R Os R COATING EQUIP. OS S S S OS OS ' TRIAL MIST [ YES ] YES [ YES [ YES ] YES ] YES DEMONSTRATION WO NO NO NO NO NO APPLICATORS [ YES YES YES YES YES YES OUALIFIED NO NO NO NO NO NO lg
- j.,
EXHIBIT. Ja ; PAINT CONTRACT SUPV. i f Page _,_Id Pages CONSTR. SUPV. O.C.INSP. b
- aC9dXM PfM @AMudR)
[3/[0RURH M5M M/ B/%CNL )
k 'gh[MfdN4bM.
; -m q y c_ g m s_r
X.'gy--ag .r -).qgn;W1 Mee.r.;.: t wyd*D.h JM'pd/W Anf.'n 7Z0$l6TNsh.14S' 3-W.MMW*'WWM'#1RW3M%'fM E M N M h lfM ih au3 T' N uP '"*"hd V STEEL - C1'J 4f@? '. ' ' MMN N. 7 't [OATE: A h '-W M ". ' ~ - ' MASONRY 9$s 4., '~~C [ REPORT NUMBER:" V ' SHIFT: g. J JT .X.'t ' - j 4 CONCRETE ... w i 4 "~ ANCHOR PATTERN: " SURFACE TD BE OSTAINEQl. < $0810 3 ~ 'r - d @... -: SAT, UNS. SAT. UNS. SAT, Ups. SAT. UNS, SAT. UNS. SAT, UNS. OSTAINED: I. O - l SURFACE PREPARATION V A ',l # "9 Ai.M'i & i .W. 'i. l PMETHOO OF M PREP: 'SMO Mf !CW. i M**1b W# i ' ' ' W SPIClFIEDI' Y,O N;3 WERE WATER AAD OIL FILTERS USEDE 7,YES M.'M .) GROUT FINISH: . y :. s y >4 g. N ), SANDPAPER TEXTURE:MO WERE THEY CH.E.C.KED_REGULA.R.L.~Y FO.. R CLEANIVES.c 8%GEtt13.' E.O my.c ,a g A g~. ' WERE THE FOLLbWlNG USED7 3D.... < m .r, ,. gE. FINAL CLEANING:.. -9 ? _.g fiFOmad RE .h5b)RIstGI kM
- }; '
Q. 'i:9 4 hED bVACUUMI d8 TYPE: l GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT ' 1ST FINISH FINISH COAT ' TOUCH UP OTHER f PAINTING SUP'URVISOR ' ff, / h in
- OC INSPECTOR J c //) O v L. LOCATION AND, REMARKS:-
_ q., t. _ : - 4 g '. ELF o,4.14,,.. Paint. W-43.i. ~,C ts ~ C W A Ouc. . ! if 3 - ~ t- = 210.O k?Q,.fe.=b& 0'f ll0E W. h f k f Rs. -T.Fao D; ,s. 4 uqw s l4 W f. Y h.,Y ' -4 1:, q.n,, piao eat:Tw NO; ctg Wigggeo, Q,.,=g.,
- gy.i 'l
~ 1 w_ b 9 T'- 7 # 69 6 [. 4 -\\ S 3 ' DFT-% 314 E Yt ? eh-Q3 ' SLIN6 - 9 603. ('s P.H* \\- D' s ^ 'J .A y; GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT 1ST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCH UP $THER DATE: f - M y 3, g %MBiENT TEMP.
- i
~F rf g # I 5 - F iI ~- ' ' *
- ~~
tY [' SURFACE TEMP. 11 8 2- [ DEW POINT: 4f f , REL HUMIDITY: ~ ///% O b. pts O .-gs WFTs ' F1 THICKNESS N/A-DFTs ps O O WFTs 'q ' READINGS: DFTs DFTs WFTs ' WFTs D [ OBTAINED: . AMN. MAX. - BUA MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. AflN. MAX. MIN. MAX. l SPECIFIED: M ggX. M/A ~ tilN.' M4K. ' ' ' aflN. MAX., MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FJN"I'SH , FINISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER } 'A. ,.EXP BATE EXP,OATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE. EXP. DATE f: . -l! ;~ PAtNT:. .j% :.. ~, .l. ' p' = f :g'y ;~. l BATCH NUMBERS
- ) fi-W I R
^5 ACT: EXP.DATE EXP. DATE EXP.DATE EXP. DATE EXP. DATE EXP. DATE U~ i. F
- APG*
APG* APG* APG* APG* APG* REDUCER USED I c.<, 3g l 't ' - COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COATING APPLIED T.2 > .. e, i 1. t. f a @B @R B R Os OR e OR Os R o OR .. COATING EQUIP. OS OS S S OS OS TRIAL MIST FYES YES YES YES YES YES DEMONSTRATION NO NO NO NO NO NO m.i APPLICATORS V YES YES YES YES YES YES OUALIFIED NO NO NO NO NO NO PAINT CONTR ACT SUPV. h,,[ f pyg -j$ CONSTR.SUPV. I P o,: o { 1 m O C. INSP. s.,
- AMOUNT PER GALLON
@/MQlMWX) $/2P@/W B/@Ott
q-1 ,.cg. S. e e 3+ =. y n e-4N ?a#WM ?'2 l
- y.ur..
.w ' ' ~ ' er $ R'd%? ' e ' f:. >;*,4 'M " AMd VM UP CTHER ~ SEAR)N FOR PREPARATION 4 ODAT FINION ' ' COAT SulLD UP i STEEt. .. $. k ^ ' i.' I' o - $2).fg .M. .: A - NATE: e., MA*3ONRY /36 3 N .?. i "k ,WEPORT NUMBER: CONCRETE /J l ~ . SHIFT: ANCHOR PATTERN: SU.. FACE TO BE OSTAINED 7 /O -l
- g~
UNS. SAT. UNS. SAT.' UIS. SAT, SAT. UNS. SAT. WBE. OSTAINED: 3 ? ;. i y Q.1 y rSURFACE PREPARATION a .s ,q yECIFIEd?/ O A Y. I .',WETHOO OF SURFACE PREPi G bM -JA.e ' '" W. "'A'ItVl - N- [ WERE WATER AldD OIL FILTERS USED? YES M NO' GROUT FINISH: ~ MJ ~ WER.E THEY CHECKED REGULARLY,FOR.CLEANbMEE. ? '. ' SAND.PA.PE.R, TE.XTURE: E . _. ?.t,3 -n .n 5 u 6 WERE THE FO.L' LOWING USED? MPFORM PELEADE. AGENT 1 * ',~ i FINAL CLEANING: v; ~ "hED... hvACUUMf .u u [ j. CURING 1 HANDLING'CORWOUNDS TYPE. f. QEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER y f
- PAINTING SUPERVISOR
/.'.h2 (,
- OC INSPECTOR LOCATION AND REMARKS
gg g (.*g;[ gg Of & W/ /hf *f- .b .)& 4 ~. y .. ~ A , 2 '} y! . i v, 3.- 4.,<. a.t '.. 3 *. p. -M GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCHUPj 4THER- "d MTE: i., /f 79 5 f,L r [ A..;. _1 4 Y W f 77I 4 AMBIENT TEIAP. *
- l SURFACE TEMP.
M' ~. ~. //f# DEW POINT: REL HUMIDITY: "Jf[# \\ DATE: /- l *I 3 Dgs O R O. -O : O ~ WG
- /A FILM THICKNESS WFTs C Fi s WFTs DFTs WFTs READINGS:
DFTs WFTs DFTs WFTs [ OBTAINED: jti. M N/A MIN. 4BAX. GRIN. MAX. MIN. BBAX. SilN. BRAX.c, I SPECIFIED: [ ijfM WA/ MIN. lEAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. '.. , -., p' q GEN' N SEAC M 1ST FINI'SH FLNISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER '/ t I EXP. liATVTE DATE. EJEP. DATE EXP. DATE EXP DATE, EXP. DATE ', 'Y^ h I' d ?'.i;$ ' @"c.' 'H ~ .).. PAINT: I ,I BATCH NUMBERS 3D. M'r L N ~ i ACT: EXP.DATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE E XP. D ATE EXP.DATE EXP. DATE t t
- l3 I
APG' APG' APG' APG' APG' APG* REDUCER USED // / yc,a l G /,j ',h, COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COATING APPLIED M, f' c B R B R B R B R B R B R l S S OS _O S l , COATING EQUIP. OS YES _OS YES YES YES TRIAL MIST YES YES DEMONST R ATION t NO NO NO NO NO NO APPLICATORS [YES YES YES YES YES YES i , OU ALIFIED NO NO NO NO NO NO L> PAINT CONTR ACT SUPV. / j h,, L. EXHlBH de-l ' CONSTR. SUPV. I I n,,} v Paco Y e4 $ O. C. INSP. ) e rwmm.3
'w*wn % %n.' .< W ~ My).Lsg _ y. :: u-- W. .d* .se 1 ,e y v.;r'. W. M 9: "~h - u %fl.& m +D W S bf sus ". % M % #% -) ./ W RAL' T kaa d ^ M *'.i 1'M648H ' +'W UP yTHER.,.9 RABSTRATE ;T,4' l d J ' 4Cw M?.gM"PtEPMTION
- 2 itc 2
1 FOR PRIMING COAT
- INW4 COAT SUll.D UP
. ?5 -/ STEEL.t.. l MApO'NRY u-. l.
- 1. '
- WP '; '. -es.r Ag.M2, f'i'~ MTE:T A- .+ 2
- r OONCRETE...
m
- 3 agg
'i mEPOnT NousEn.- - j$5 ANCHOR PATTERN; v 's fSHIFT: + j EURFACE TO BE DSTAINED .SPP lO OOTAINED:- MN - r SA.UNS. SAT.UNS. SAT,UNE. SAT,UfE SAT.UNS. SAT.UNS. It LasnFACE PREPARATION hPECIFIED: 0*h. t W.'t [tIETHOO OF SURFACE PREP: dr.7_f / W ANO N 7 , GROUT FINISH: IWERE WATER AfE) OIL FILTERS USEDF ' YES _ IWERE THEY CHECNED stEGULARLY FOR CLEANUNESS? NES ' NO b
- SANDb4ER TEXTURE:b FORMRh
'AGENTE
- ' TYPE. M h flNkL' CLEANING:
. NilEAE THE FOtt$hlNG USED? ' ~~ hVACUUMI N DUSTED b ,-T~ CURING /MANDLhMG COMPOUNDS TYPE: / >. . N' s f;ER PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER V [ym ff _ - PAINTING SUPERVISOR 't OC INSPECTOR m' r $,.. v2, / % r w c, O c w T : / b L "i ^"*;"*"; lM'eslc.xr.co(.M& Eku +' ?***$6rk. ;Fnoel [ k k.75 1MO~E.-pll~ g[. f } ,~ g. \\ M ST "I!!9-Ea 4-t &s Dir 94st-1 v-92 SJ d 9 M*f<A */:Ui [Ws=.%[ GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCH UP. OTHER
- s..
.19 2.-r2 u53 9, a. r'. -. := i. 'gg, c.-., q - -, f 4 s e, -~f' W e5 mygygp7. riiURFACE TEMP. 7.i * ' DEW POINT: g'A 6' CEL HUMIDITY: 4// f f j / DATE: l 1. J '). f L. ~ ' FILM THICKNESS - Q ~747 7 O > B,WFTs - OO C O O DFTs WFTs ' DPIs DFTs WFTs D6 Ys WFTs l CEMNNGS: DFTs WF P I OSTAINED: f)$N pg M/A MIN. WAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. - SPECFIED: M. M@ .M/A MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FlylSH FINtSH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER _XP.DATE. E EXP. DATE EMP.' 9 ATE EXP. dATE EXP.DATE EXP. DATE l ? i PAINT: '/. 0 BATCH NUMBERS ') O $ 1 7 _T J. b ACT: EXP.DATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE E XP. D ATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE = ^ U. / F Q I APG' APG' APG' APG* APG* \\ APG' [ ] REDUCER USED g 9f c/t' ?y /4 f4 COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR COD CO ATING,. APPLIED 0*',Fll,j,. f *. / f( @B B R Os R 8 OR e R Os q gr_ OS _O S _O S COATING EQUIP. S S S g YES YES YES YES YES YES
- TRIAL MIST NO NO NO
. DEMONSTR ATION 40 NO NO -m
== APPLICATORS ,a'iES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO l OUALIFIED
- PAINT CONTR ACT SUPV.
[ [gh gg]3 / f. qj f /g 4 p L rve n camv
_ __1 . T p, 's <.Os
- 1. _] ]'f =,.
e ?'~ sh,,] l ,8,,, ,J g g...] : i '.s n, y -g. ,,s .. s. v }l ' ', z ~ >. w..
- 7. ',:
31.7 g ,5 e j ,= r V a.;l,
- . Q '~'t g g r'. W. m +
- A.T
( i.~'_ ......t c ' .. ;J l Ia.4'* .1 '."., M. c.h 1 .1.x& .<'s ~~ ~ ( '. ~ T 3- - f ', '- 1N* 'tW*'y.;( A 'l ^
- s
- ;
b N N E W S D.. h N N b N 'I'bNhk YO.h b .Orh M " E " 4 % '# _ m.auuseswmE.wpwdMW nr#UmtWKam4C M + Wern e m M.ask m il W.> M A N i m *vac t W ad % '* } UF M MIrM M ywwuqisy3 M.i M.M N[-N Y M b l di $T M M h d '#.I' S N T. ' W-N- ~ W5WAGINGWWMWiWDME5WWk$gA MMM' PR$P:' N4. I iMJ.D W I'.YrMMd NNd.d NUM hlktdEO I
- 2 $
t.IE,Sh NO.. . T, . E N.5 C.e,.. hep ..... n % ,.M. RE ~' l Jr J i RE' .XtD My,ULARLYJOH CLEANLINESSL Y 4,NQ d r 7./,,., ~. GAOUT.FIPHSH.:... TEM. 'F -.. c. jt,TE RS, SANDPAPEli TEX l M.j itt[o W.$y $. M.<... M - c. %, khiE. W& ,~s'O.. kdA N 0 ~^ .m[ s 4... .n o.., -..m k. h... 3 #2 e, ., f 1. GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT 1ST FINISil flNISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER_ _ 'PAM SUPERVISOR i( d 'k.g[gpL -k r ) ' QC INSPECTOR 'si b s n enE. . f c.~, t 2.p&:sAh.x',W.6 W^ h} ;&y.- w.. ~:.y k ' k e% &m W & n h.cygy p.
- .,, o. +
- ? y 'W <.% v;l.. ' ' J.- l 6% 2s:k*Lk
^ k a ,, g* s. nW;?. Wf*~.m, I'.;i. M '. .:- ~d' 4 h f _;, 3 @. g M L GEN.LPRIMING SEAL ' COAT. N (, s. 7 $7 FINISH HNIEN CDAT 19U3HEd, M Y W M i t lune *: ~ @RE. :: L ' -.% w
- c.,
4 =..m.vm pp gn. u.n%r..k.g.w3 '.4*?'P7@S .,mseslENT' TEMP e. . I ~ ?d'M. h -i; -4 t . '..', -h- / ; ?,ML. nr/T SURFACE TEtr. 4 'O2r 'i ~ ~. '. ' i J.'k;._ /.' M C's ?/)* '. 1.~@d;T SPM.3.'Jf.' 't ~~ ~,3> '- F.TIP ~ 3 ?.' 6, 5.E ' ; nni?'#d'/ DEW POINT: hEL HUMIDITY: [ ?. 9.; QJj$fl/f; n. 4 '.i' ':.W.~ t N ! -i.: e,;jbNM .R c TE' , Q:. C 2- ~' D_ l %fA ' ?, Q ? ll D, p: Q' .#stu TMsCKNESS '.'i D Ts " MF Ts. ' s N Ts " l 's - s" s N Ts.
- t s'
MINGS: J ETAINED: .F~~. 1 M4N.' ' GRAX. N/A $4tN.' 18AX
- imif[fdl 'Upl'. )AAX.' ' MIN. 4dAX.td.I O
.MECIFIEO: 1dlN.' REAX.- ~ CN/A' NfMNMAX. at1N.' $ 34AX. netdil X. 'MfW. ' thAX.S ' l i' e- -- s.. V.,, 9, - 4. t J;. ', ; 1 GEN.,PRetAING < SEAL COAIj SET EJNISJ FadIISH COAT. TOUCH'# OTHER' ^'#' t
- 6..M '/f'd!.l" MMP.' OATE. I' EXP.DATE' g,WT1i
^J2Ph0 ATE.h:pt?. DATE EXP. _ OATE :.i - >~,L. :;[4l nlMQdp. c c.m.. gr..,. c m %- 2 Wgms 5 a .m..w ) %,4. w. .v wVg m... - 9,_W m.. g m . b
- w...
w. .c e,. 1 7 m BATCH SfundBERS ~ - m-4 ACT: EXP.DATE EXP. DATE.
- _g4Gg '
. i a EXP.DATE EXP. DATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE l ~ $ ::,; V.jf i APG* APG' APG' APG' APG* APG* REDUCER USED .ti, COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE l COATING APPLIED CB j - iq R B R B R OR 08 OR On OR _C S TRIAL MIST 'YES __ _S _,, U,. _ _ _S _O_S _,O,_S . _ O,, S COATING EQUIP. . YES YES YES YES YES NO DEMONSTRATION NO NO as r NO NO NO APPLICA TORS YES YES YES YES YES YES OU ALIFIED NO NO NO . NO NO NO f PAINT CON TR/sCT SUPV 4,gg jf Q .t CONSTR.SUPV ,\\ L/ g-p pf' _ OC I N SP. ' AMOUNT PE R GALLON B/B RUSH S/ SPRAY R/ ROLL
s
- s.:.
p.,, s, .t. g r. ww w., e l O, . ~, -. .3' >7 'y g. m. 1 c t t ;. r. ~..... 1 1 ,.,; c B,, ~ T. '.y e,=. .,e L $kw'WW4U.G.%kM CVMY &M 4%e1Iii[f99a%M %t4W ~ .sS puront NunestaM:,W ~ 2.-_.h 7:-5. W W:Medi@fe :Off4 F berw Mw;r:'v.f& '- O 9 W12nrq t *.! ^ 9-%@ g4.(.,wgg[.., gW w punrAce sp.sr.gsTsNaD wy 9 >.- M -"-A it r.gymyc.c e.. t ,ggg .;.. ~ c. '6t%W.?d. - 54TjUNS. SAT. UNS. SAT K ]dhT' ppjsAT,ONS, 08TA!NEDj, H .M-77eW %h'*e.' b,,gl> SAT hARFACE.PREPARATMNI.L e tc, 'A T i X -u f9-F MM N.fD **^.'e #J4 M ?:W asETH00 0FiDSMAMPREP:WA% W -9 WJCIbih* M M M O N NYSIkNhDN N - N .WrERE CA.T.ER'AN.O...OAL fil.TE._RS UgD.)s..Y.E,S ..s.O M 557NVEs? ", 4.,N i ' "n.,r f,,.M, A_ ROUT'. FIN'IS'Hil Md 'N L. .c w . _....u c o .w. .g s.s m. wEnE twav?a+ecxs6 itEcut'AgLV ron CLE.ANUNE: W ; '.; V'.5ANOPAPJR, TEXTURE;sig4ft D-MhTE70if n % k. h N d.tii. h i'2 k 7 DMO?d@@fiiiidusifoiinW487tM W[dAINOI41ivik%o'c M * [. TIE M N d A h E, i%@+QhM. GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT IST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER _PAmTiNo SUPERVISOR HILh OC INSPECTOR
- Nv'. _l$ E
) 1 f y Qf
- s$
.g Nk- $rs'T. b k A .W s 3 s O p:* h.za g& A=l7.Vlh5:k}y-s& y,..EL 4 -}M3 9 fu -u -111pr,f ~ 1 iST T4N!91. '. FINISH COAT -l,tr~ s. or4 f (f.1 .;.,,,. h f - I GEN. Pl TIMING SEAL COAT TOUCH.W DTHEft W ' ' ' *lM T ., @ p <f y. , e: OATE: ' iM hMM . - s i idi
- 4 3. h
- 'd.;?i-n
~'
- $ t
'U' i ?.k. +M '9b
- N _ '< - Y~$Y].? 'M S ETT:
AMBIENT TEMP. s ,, SURF ACE TEMP,;) 4- - 25 L _ ' n ~ * [6*-e *r Q 5i lL.M 'T M*. ; ? %. M PO WT ~. * ' ' f ' * *' ' ' -3 ' ~ ' ' ?b'~ ' ** %^ ..E ~ REL HUMIDITY: ~ / *. E 4/4/ % DATE: _ -f ~t h D c
- i. j HLM 1HICKNESS O
-O a/^ OO E -0,:.' O r d .-C I MEADINGS: DFTs WFTs OFis.WPFTs ' OFTs - WFTs * ' OFTs' 1NTs "DFT4-s*0 'OSTAINED: ' '( ' MIN. ' MAX. -N/A. ' M IN l M A X..I MINfl M d ' MIN. MAX. tHN.'$ MAX.'.J h ! 9'ECIFIED: ' ~~" Yl'. FMAX.
- W A '*
N MfN 'M.1 tiMN.' 'Mi ' MIN. M, ~ MIN. ' MAX.' ' ) ' ~~ 1 .-3 GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT ISTIWitSHL FINISH COAT - ' TOUCH.LI, OTMdn G 'l M MMy$2,..b' _;'k. ?'EXP, DATE : EXP.DATE' $XP. DATf[ yJXP.DATE f EXP. DATE EXPc SATE t ' h ,hh'c,[ PAINT:[., 3'f'S {,, ' ' ' -1DQ g " [Idh.kMIFIrk,. i'9.'),k %'. DA N b- ' BATCH NUMBERS ~~ ACT: EXP.DATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE E XP. D ATE EXP.DATE EXP M.y-13 n APG* APG* APG* _ APG* APG* APG* REDUCER USED d Jp }l l COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COATING APPLIED OT e OR @BT"1 = CB OR B R OB TRIAL MIST YES ~IYCS -.n-OOR Os R . COATING EQUIP. C_ S ,O S S S S S 1 YES YES YES YES l DEMONSTRATION NO .N_O NO / NO NO _N O \\ -n = m APPLICA TO RS .YES YES YES YES YES YES y _OU A LI F I E D NO NO I PAINT CONTRACT SUPv NO NO NO NO lCONSTR SUPV. budi 1 D(HIBITJ '\\ N gir g __g g._ f' gp OC INSP. 'n ' AMOUNT PE R GALLON B/8 RUSH S/SPR A Y R/ ROLL A
... j . w w,,,, c Er n ~.m 'g ,REABON teeNG 0 /J LD t$ h%. .d i " *g Y TEi?.',!8t M $ N $ MWl ?!!.?An~h W:t ~'k[41W ' ?'8 ~ !~ h 'h; . 1 bN[." @IEPORT. NURSER: 7-r.S.N5 @J'-Xe 'c3. % M'". 9. j M 9 t'1 T "'E N.;W ~: l ' I-r iSitFT: % -4 A >.@ * > i -i : s -:-V - - :-] /W - M S-? ~ PATTERN: s rgURFACE TO SE OSTAINED ' '4 F. 9 * " '-ii3]ML ~~' 'T " ef ' C y.'t-v 9g.. ~ SAT. UNS. SAT. UMS. SAT,, . S3T' % SAT.. UNS.. SATjUNS.- WTAINEO: % 3 4,.. ^ 'c' re % %;"f&8* : @d.f14 ' NACE PSFAhADON A r-i 7'4 9 4# <. ' ~ i ' 'Q nMi g.4, 6 Q Q. ( 1.. kvNbO #aogrAes war. e, m.- we w.r eg . C 'meMiesn'rgTrJW/ b 5'.A_.Nd O!L. FILTERS,USED?. XES, 'NO GROOTIFild!SH: A 'l E., 3 ~. z '.W ~4s'RANDPAPER TEXTUR y.. .e
- s. <,.2...
%ERE TMY CHECKE:D $1EGUL.ARLY FOR CLEANLINESS?. Y -E .' ' F0941 ~ c,w ,u.~.. w. _. v@. _.. + w m.e : AGENTS. ', TYPE:jgy :M . + g' s . - xw a.,n.
- ~
J.a WERE EOLIDIMNG B ' 'd.'- 'h6"I ik}f UCUdIHANOt'INdCOMPbbhhSik TYPE: N bOhTbD k' V { ,yj GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT 1ST FINISH EINISH CQAT TOUCH UP OTHER PAINTING' SUPERVISOR K t h ipL OC INSPECTOR D. Uj<, i.u b a: M..qy c(h hLI6hIk^:h h'rm ;.. ~ m4 1 s.. @ b 's 4 T - 2' R k Nb bk M'M*ey. ^ h v v.wg . e.u. h ^ , w'w. w w %... e..o.,.m. w. m&_fi fa s '. f r %.W" MY hh8 '4= $=53 O f $ b ih12' *fr$ 3 h noS V
- 2 1 2 *f 8 4
I,",. Q S.';;.-u .,- 7 : 1 GEN. PRIMING SEAL-COAT IST FINISH FINISH DA[ TOUCH E dTHER ". l~i,.I' i'~ 'r; - ( /,/# 73 -v c.?g <- '. u. m - @ ATE: ~ /AMifENT 'Tfil'P.' H* ~\\~ '4 I' ~ ~ .C 'd ' 70 y, ' J i .T ' "'&. 7 {f 8 [ SURFACE TEMP ' - W '- T//f ? *- e- '; i.. 5 DEW POINT: ~ ~ Ad
- ES
'*/ REL HUMIDITY: 7# T8f i _ j. js.P 5 ,oATE: e FILM THtCKNESS O O
- /^
10 R..O.. 'g's g1 p< ~s~.gEs { C'EADINGS: ~ DFTs WF Ts - DFTs WFTs ; OFTs WFTs.J D Ts' c f_OBTAINED: - MIN. MAX. M/A JBIN. -MAX. MINI"OMAfl MIN. I$AX.1. MIN. ~ MAX.-') $ SPECIFIED: MIN. MAX. - ~ N/A %Bt. fMAX. MIN. MAX. MIN.. MAX.# ' MIN [ MAX. { GEN. PRIMING ~ SEAL COAT 3ST F8MISH FINt$H COAT.. YOUCH LF. OTHER g, .i,. i.,-f U ' 7;j -k ['Y
- PAINT: ;
' EXP. DATE (-fEXP.DATE .EMP.DATE EXP.. D ATE EXP.DATE; $XP. DATE y .ATCH NUMBERS - ;;h-S j37, @ b3,tWJ V. j ({.[ 9'ip :.1'. [ m.r <c. ACT: EXP. DATE EXP.DATE EXP. DATE 'I'XP.'D ATE EXP.DATE EXP. DATE VO y of T_Th APG* APG* APG* APG* APG* APG* REDUCER USED r $ 7 k 'I J ) COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COATING APPLIED YN [OS'O R a R 8 OR 08 OR OB R 8 R B COATING EQUIP. OS OS S OS OS TRIAL MIST YES YES YES YES YES YES 5 , DEMONSTRATION NO NO NO PJO NO NO I ~~ 7 'YES YES YES APPLICATORS YES YES YES i OUALIFIED NO NO . NO NO NO NO [T,fuh, pyggJf PAINT CONTRACT SUPV. CONSTR. SUPV.
- i I t.e( G pm J_g{
l O.C.INSP. d ___._l__,--____._
- AMOUNT PE R G AL LON B/B RUSH S/SPR AY R/R OLL d'
t
t q ,,, p W :'$h$$5$4~'.:*W D ' ?.:& ' " N'TN N.%&hh Y't% Ekh L,
- k*.?lf:
W anmaaFR:'"T.Y % ; f:' 4,& ',%.'.32 V 4'M $R~h Q.& N G$5S: & *.I'AQ q
- 'S h (' ;5
-ffyf leHIF1: : s '.^.y:n n.e 2:."
- 4 -9&&]ht' * ' m~-
Ms% i [$U' FACE TD SE OSTAINGO 1
- I: M %*N-MWs -
-i ' G%d
- A M
~-f. ' f-I NM fMQhMTAW WMT UNS. SAT. WES. SAy % %[RFACE MEPARAftON ' ? c. G ".",%'r.M(iM1M :.-T' 'i 2:4 (.5 .* s :.%. 5.. c., ' SAT. UNS; SAT. Uts. Yks[ssMTW
- W
- c. ~
i p OF suRFacs rREe:* e@ s%#.eMAgr ww %q yWERE WATER.452.c~ li. FILTERS USED? - YES
- Y N ' 4 p
,.).,. M9 ". b.,,-T GRO N. ' Wii N ->i. M d.7. i.- i O NO ..w.. ., e . M x; .-~.,.: @ERE T. HEY' QiECKED REGULARLY FOR CLEANLINESE7 i. ~NO.. - .,; b.. a bA
- JEXT4#R R
n,..., ne;IOLLWufMG iSEDP W-@-MOR,M I~.x - a s: -.... u. .. u : - . ~.e r.-n"> 4N Al.- Mm .. ~. WERE,THE ., s_ - . p *., s.. ?.- v.. c. ~.. x..- w, <, ~~ s Mt#0VNDS. y',.,/ :'M-i. .)(. W.,c.'.?. W-- k.f. .n M v 3'
- W -C.CURINGl.
g GEN. PRINING SEAL COAT IST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER a OC INSPECTOR M i k OAL . PAINTING SUPERVISOR t ,1; v, N - W.OCATION AND REMARKS:.;p {, gp gg,'gf/f ~! F F S$f[- D OIMk[./N # [p S,I,M S. .< N* E. i,!. n ~ 9 8 ..%a .-~..,- .c -. m .,...w w ~t. - ~.. ~... - (.,% . y..s yL: >-~ r 2. 3 - .y.;. d b h'h I EC i V-t-f \\ ' C F T.N,_T/A.1 $f - F) dt -la 'D.f Di M,., y ;.d d/ N_ ;g a.I I 'N .,3 [r.; A ', GEN. Pftl MING SECCOAT. 1ST FINISH ' FINISH C6AT. TOUCN WP'a OTHER ' 0" ".; ~l ,'.3. @ ATE:, ( r ' ' 1.' - L -. ',, j~#4 U ' <-- 9: '**@ '"i'o @ EAMBIENT' TEMP. l F~ %. ' VD
- i' f,. ' T
" 7[ f. ' ' ' YY fT "*i"M ' ~ ~ ~ "ytf 7 . JM3D _W .W,W ESURFACE TEMP.
- W
'..c ! DEW POINT: ? ^M*0 M ' f * "* j J "/* iREL HUMIDITY: Q$Cf '~- m, fDATE: - '-7<-*- u . / #7 73 'e J.
- ,. r6g b FILM THICKNESS.
~ .O.O' 'u^ 5+ p-O -: 0 ; ' 7 pts p's 'WFTs d U9 [ READINGS: OFTs "WF Ts . b-H M. is fkFTs ' CF.s-W Ts' E 's J ~N / IOBTAINED: MIN. WAX. - 1&A'd MIN.J. MAX. ' ' 3H N MAXN MIN. MAX.' MIN.' MAX Y I f $PECIFIED: MIN. MAX. ' WA '*M 141N' Md' mfM. #h I ' WIN. ' MAX" MIN;" MAX.I GEN. PRIMING SEAL COATt SM $4NtSH - . FINISH COAT. TOUCHIFE 01 -4ER : < N... I '[k' j ,(W. : FAINT':,h"; k ; c EXP. @ ATE N EXP.DA%.8PJOATE j '4XP. DATE ( EXP. DATE; h.. - M, d.,.N. 'a,. 4 $.'.N .dM,,MA' is,9~ (.i - U.D*~M.e % A"f,$5b, M .'1 .p 3 'e ^- "~ ~ -v '*g.a .m ..n-
- : z,' -
BATCH NUMBERS x ACT: EXP.DATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE EXP. D ATE EXP. DATE EXP.DATE ac.~.. m. APG' APG* APG* "APG* APG* APG* REDUCER USED , c 4 l i' 7, COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE {M#M LOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COATING APPLIED l B R B R OB R D o ~' U R B OR OB OR _O S OS l COATING EQUIP. S S S S , TRIAL MIST YES YES jfES YES YES YES ' DEMONSTRATION NO NO NO jNO NO NO . APPLICATORS YES YES YES / YES '~ YES YES i OUALIFIED . NO NO NO NO NO NO ' PAINT CONTRACT SUPV. id E gl. M T. S I-l CONSTR. SUPV. W 1, N L ul.* I-bd W,g Dg Q. C. INSP. d (' ,)
- AMOUNT PER GALLON B/8 RUSH S/ SPRAY R/ ROLL -
[
l J t 1. < y [ lLb C 2. 'q 3 s ,'g,-. STEE~ S'N l DAT('5d!it' N fFT 'l'Id dN M YNC' d IM N M AN M 'di W iIS M i CONCnEn b,k; 'N ! WEPORT NR: -- d d$Y'M iwl N W 4 M '-U f M 9 f T'M.VM m 1 - f k ? '.: ; h-h * -I* $Y h ;.h & Y.r.^.h * .'SQ'hk* f f f .m, " , ! 'guschce 50 sE asTAmsp sl wm 1 'a Mov '.siMEl _. Awe % OSTAMED: p O4;.. f T.i.: ', 540 a.? : T. UNS.] SAT. Uf6 ' T. yNS.] SAT UNS SAT. UNS. SAT W@ A4lELPREPARATION f. ?"i Q Q y'. E '; ?. ;-d 4{ e 1 4R ! M ~ ~ .. - W ~ --m ingentoD OF'suRFaGE PREP:'%1hWOti 4.W.1 y"u. l$g II Vd Th'*$EPECiFiED[~ INM p?YGROUT.FINISHN> :s4 l 4rERE.9 TATER *AND OIL FJ4.T, ERS.u4ISED? e..V,ES m,- ,,- s ~.- :5 iv.j -.,. i.g :.;%m.~~ ?. - .js.. m -><-;.. n 2n w. s. ,,:....~ ,u m .p.,:=. :.m, CKED : EGULARt.Y.m R .ANL ESS7 WES. WERE THEY CHE MQ.- 2-AP.E, .~.-m . p.,,2 v.n i A ..,w .u v w.. TYPE: -s
- NA CCE
$,. ~ p'WERE,THE.g]gfi}peft.. o N3.@?'..NG USED7 ' ? d @ p @ g/gogna' M.gy PAIMDNG SUPERVISOR. GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT 1ST FINISH FINISH COAT TOUCH UP OTHER - 'l 'N j K L ('.4 Lla,f l OC INSPECTOR .)i.v.r - I O k,0CAQAND4EMARgg pg-g4gg j ge.jg,py .T ,6
- ipMg Mg
.. :.. e d C id, I6 ' A:W ;-y, ..i,' 7".*:>,5. Nkd hk.n,jW7/..h-p.fh .~...: v;- ~. .? ~.~ ~- ,f, - "..m-e '--p 2.;b r v M... Q... f n5; s[W/.- =~ .%4 .s !!NfNL. . 0.]F $ $1 '[si,o '. 64 ' 1 *Y;1:n ~. y'*1 V3 {= g.'w j.' k 1.i-t y "E t'kms h; :.,.; &. >s.1 'dy? Y
- a...,. : -
.m - .yG> L-t . ::3,4 O FT ~ 1b gg ' e [ -. 'f - GEN. PRIMING SEAL COAT 1ST FINISH FINISH COA'T TOUCH 1p [MWY 'b a-* ! hq 7 78 .T TE:
- i., ;Z C-w.
24 '. t - /.7/ M -w"3 WR ~- -0 .,q - g fan g g y3 g y - v- "w w g ~.
- SURFACE TEtr.
e--- Jr W* .s.-- + IDEW'.PSINT. 1 9.' ' 1REL HUMIDITY: 4 'J Pd ~~ b OhTs bb, ILM THICKNESS O.O J a/^ OO-l '7READINGS: OFTs* WFTs - . OFTs 'WFTs' DFTs WFTs DFTs WFTs..DFTs m MIN. MAX." N/A - MIN. MAX. MitNMAb MIN. MAX. ANN.0 MAX. - OBTAINED: t MIN. MA3C. N/A MIN. MAX. MIN. 7EAX. MIN. ' MAX. Mal. ' MAX.
- 1 SPECIFIED
~ -- a; 2, 4 . ' ' ' + GEN. tRIINNG SEAL '00AT 4ST FINISH FINISH COAT - TOUCH UP - OTHER ' ^ l ff E,d b I M '$ ~ Y D,k .EXP. DATE : f)(P. DATE EK*.DATE', EXP. DATE C EXP.DATE EXP. DATE ' 3. "l' PAINT [ k' ' LQ[r%.* /"[77dy: ' Iykj [ ~. bh,41h V.:. -Et _ 'f3 -] BATCH NUMBERS & & h at t s y' J ACT: EXP.DATE EXP.DATE EXP.DATE 5 XP. D ATE ' EXP.DATE EXP. DATE i 8't,
- s. ( 3 "I t.
4 )' APG* APG* APG* APG* APG* APG* j l REDUCER USED < \\w 3, ) gOi.OR CIODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR CODE COLOR COOE i { COAVING APPLIED f.,f. '.l$1 1 OB R B R Da OR OF'UR a OR OB R I i COATING EQUIP. CS S S OS OS OS l
- TRIAL MIST
]YES ] YES [ YES ]YES ] YES ] YES l DEMONSTRATION NO NO NO NO NO NO j APPLICATORS iYES YES YES /YES YES YES l ' OUALIFIED NO NO NO NO NO NO l PAIMT CONTRACT SUPV. i \\ i i. d lt, F)QijBITJ/ CONSTR. SUPV. s t. L L.u Paoa 8o[{ u. _ I O. C. INSP. ( k
- AMOUNT PER GALLON B/ BRUSH
. S/SPR AY R /R O L L : o.]
i L 7R.sts PROTECTWE COAM A EL me. f A/_ arrucAtoms surv T-w o,s T _.1 .AL T e RE.ASom FOR PREPAAATION PRasseG COAT cease EI3AT SuuD UP DATE ( 12 41 $4M -y _MPORT IIutseER. d// AA/ heft- $3 V 159 SUAF ACE TO SE OSTAsseED f// 0 M1 afU8E SAT.UIE EA Uet SAT. UeE SAT.UML SAT. UML OSTAmeED SUAF ACE PREPAAAT10se esETHoo OF RJfeFACE PW W
- A- &
aurSh W607 50 em0UT PuessM MIts WATH Afe 06L FILTEAS LEED? YES 11 0 SANoPAPER TEXTURE M WRE THEY CMSCXED REOULARLY FOR CLEAfeuMES? YE At_ 00 0 FINAL CLEANtNG WERE THE FOLLoweseG LSEDP POmas AELEASE AGENTE hDLETED hy m CUeNeeG / MAfeUseG CoadPOueWL TYPE _ M PRInsues
- E*'_ 97 NT Few FeNetM COAT T"'_"N UP OTHEA unntamses amImmon
- s. m i. -
r -a. _z m-- sepecton o ira -- 4d A W _ r '** * """*"" fedL. Vfyr hus7 kJe 940 N $tch 6tu.wc, ha ? 75 feous tus W e 4).0 Ef'O (r C-eE=. ca so TEAL coat wr emmeM FeesM caAT Toucu W Omma aAn 41., s.r.x c.s.n AASetNT T14AP fy 4 9f# m m a-SURFAct Tsar y J., ' f gr # SEW P0estT f4 ' gp' IIEL MunsetTY 4/We W 7, eATE u.v.s.f s.J. if ami 1 e oea e t '.b shre h)he OBTAINED $NL P*- kA $M RAIL tt43L RIWL IRAK. M alAIL M NFIED 9tLW"_ aWA test etax, tagt esAK. m 3 43L 'g M PRIIMIS MAL COAT ST FEIW4 PMW COAT 10U06 W OT W W.aATE E3r DATE W. RATE M- .ATcM mum no r e. r-w4 s -w.sy AcT: gP gf!D w DATE m.nATE w, Daft te aan
- M AJE, tr-s.b ad iL #4 g
m-m- m-m- sea-nea- ] REDUC [R USE D MA $ saB 4Arff cooE cm oc cooE caoa coot caen cosE s ys-co on coot coton caos f =
- A6 ",
[ r COATING Met *ED d (, WM f L,3 7, - 4
- n. Da ers_, FP !!
a C a O s D a On B7:Da ' Os ~ YES ~ YES '~ TTS =. _c o A = G m u ~' YES ~ YES -.ur a Js Os s .r h TM4At emST i A,et.c ions ] pas _ I 80 3 % [ em esO W D( WMI R AI DOD. h,geO
- ns
-
- m
- ns
- ns
- vis e
o auALnito x =o m mo no mo l .AmeT cowTascT surv
- f. *
- _.
d rd A J consTn u n
- m. m '
r A - a.- .:q ~ o c Inse asJ L as _^ r / V i 'minoutn pea eAttan imeeutu
1 .4 e* 7R,3 A S,am, 18PuC450Its Stry Tou7o4 OTHER T1 eEjeEnAL SEAL PensT Pumma maaanes poet PREPAAAT100s PhensIG CXhAT PueWe CDAT BueLD LP l-Idfj y DATE At ansont aanssen. fJN sept @FS SAT.uesL SAT, tm mat. un'a SAT. " ant. SAT.l"'*- SAT. UesL OBTAMED SueF ACE TO SE OSTANIED _g V sueF ACE PREPAAAYtON VJ OROUT Pesen sp,C Piso usTMOD OP sunPACE Pe U YES S AD Y MAS WATER AfsD Ott FM.TEMS USED7
- v. d gangpepga q MRE THEY CMBCKED fuscutARLY PC98 e'snam insmas, PpW, o saassaan.
- TYPE. P0nes mELEAM AGEErYt h0LETED h MRE THE POLLOWueG USEDP CunesG / paanna aman CDbr0Uset TYPE - as '2 NT WT Peeldt PWesgM COAT TmrH LF vT.GR G Esa pnetasego M
- ****"' Al*' 2 Vauf Duet Eki9;&
$)o ye ~ 4 $us.s 'W E $wyg;. Q h" NO 2 O L S S L PRet0 BIG SEAL CDAT 57 PtISBN PueSM COAT Ig utts y Aamorf Tune. 92-sueFACs Tsar. (/' _W POsett A_
====mummmmmmmme mammmmm mmmma ML taassorTV
- m. JE._J!,El_, _l h
ir. irL { i asAonset amm. sanx. samL man.
- uma, esmL an u wA estaman M
MAX. WA $3 h 343, gg, 34g, mg, WWCDPMD-4 ~ GSL PRatanes .AL COAT ST PeugM PenDI COAT 10EE38 tr M WP,DATI m, aan any. aaft er eAfg g g, ~ 8A N pJbe '$.1 Paarf p.33.M Mr.DATE W. 8413 hg aArcu monessen g 8cT: M*. DATT er.DATI APc-apo-Are-ano-m- n.- - mm NE CDLOa CDOE <DLOR CCDE COLON M r COLOst CODE Colost C00E y CODE yr COAf tpeG AMLSED 60" 06P" - 6P %2" o6 i coat.ec - 08 0 acD $ 'sw ago es0 g m m r. v. 2 ( D " I"" # ouALwwo omo ao uno amo no se .c u = Pd-
- 9 ')
p g r. _r PAAET CXIIrTn,CT 3.rv y j AL 7 - 4 " -','I m .~A mem =' CONETR SJPW rer ras sw._
- Assount sea ansiam
- gestapt 90 PRAY Ib4GLL L
oC weP -9
a fi .m E = e-7stols NOTECTWE ^d 88 A&M A[ [3 _ __ _ APPtICAM Srv ci ~~ ~ M iAL MAL F9st pgeme TOUCMir tynEn l ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ gag 1 IDEAGOes FOR PREPAAATIOst PetsameeG CDAT
- Em CDAT SuetD LP DATE NO gy A& PORT seUMeiR o /O y
DesFT As4 pg i SURF ACE TO SE OsT Asset o p er/O O EAT U885 SAT.UenSAT. Lag SAT, Lpt SAT. 42 1 SAT. Lag MTABED k, (Aur____ gjns ACE PsiEPARATIO8e { Wq OF R_)RF ACE P8tEP [ WERE WATER AfeD Ott FILTERS USEO? YES d 850 GROUT FIpseSH. E MRE THEY CHECKED REGULARLY FOR CLEAleLHeEM) YES 80 0 SM ePAPER YtrTunt & ggRt THE FOLLOwineG USED' FOnte stELEASE AGENT 5 - TYPE __ F Q.EAN6880 CUfelleG / MANDLeeG COMPOUseOS _ TYM h gaat Psuesse4 SEAL COAT GET FWeept.. FNgH COAT igyD1 UP EUPE RvisDR p A4. I N ^ ""* * ~ Q d.,2. VM Oce T AJ. 0 '2 NO ? O L Mh C6 f $= W .t fMC. y9 y g L OEN. PRIHe88G MAL COAT tST FeedeSM Fase SH COAT TOUEDI F DATE: W F-F.7 s.. T T n-8u"'ac' = 98 ' i _me.,OswT s s (( f "a'AeE***'" M iE. o9. M. E. M. d, h r, M. WrW n" E a [ ~ esTAmeto sneeN .9 lax wA some anAx. asse awl asus, s w L essL sena..-- y suAx. se/A must max. m max. m max. m sto E est Piuseaso asAL COAT ist roman penew coat ToucuuP. as oAn w oan tr. mm sur oAn anr. man ,.e,T en, n. m i f E BATCH seUssBER5 F#/' S 7-9 di ACT EXP DATE EXP DATE, EXP oATE Exp 04n gar, NAM EXP. SATR _ ys.apu e ss -n Arc-AeG _ Arc _ APg-wa-
- W P *
S'D _Aest ie %. COLOR CDDE COLOR CODE CDUDR COBE [ Cotoa CODE C8 CODE CDLOR CDO(l _u/h m_ _ _ D_1Os Da Os Da QOa ObiOa Co Ti c Areut o u m = EN na Os i s_ .J.15 Os Os J,i s s Coat = **' L vts
- vts
- m
- m
- m l
v., % ea i Di W i k ' ' ' A aso suo seo 1 e,C suo 9 g a_ -Oos is m m m m i ateO seo _iesp _. Is i eso q) _ _ _[ ) CRAALMIED_ .fP /m. L E>. M.'e 31-i PAspri coNrRAc1 sury ~ g 4a - ~ ~~ 3 8A-en-1 I comesTR surv u.. d { OC istS9 }&Q, Jasouert run settom nonuen teinAv seen l
^ ~ . yILOIS arPUCAIORT BWV _ A96 M GENEaAL MAL PeWY Peppt 10MDe lf OI M SESTh&15 EEASON FOR PREPAAATION PRanNS COAT Pumpt CDAT GUILD LP DATE: 8-M 08.M y .,0.T I.-a: m. es . BJeFAc5 TO AE OSTAmuBD JP G SAT LNE SAT. LNE EAT LNE. BAT. WIE. SAT. UIE SAT. gg MTAmmk j SJAPACE PREPARAftch v_ Y RIETHOD OF RJ8tF Act PREE all M ptCsPISD: A m WAffa AIID Ost FILTERS LSEOF YES 110 GROUT Ptsett: 1 MAE THEY CNECKED IIEOULAaLY FOR ce raans mesman yge #_ gnagpegg ygg r MM THE POLLOWIIIG LMEOF PORII RELEA M AGEIrTE. A TYPE: FaseAL CLEAleleG. i h.-i, h m - CUftspeG f naamms aman mammE+VA Type: ) est PReasseo asat 97 37 FesIEM FussEM mat Taa UP LTem %v-m** ave 9a 4 m eeCTon d [veY So, M1,- D.c 290 Q " * * * * ~ ~ n l News $/.ws dd 'i9" To c.,ib we Or / 'iC * /).o 2.fo OSIL PRIRINGS MAL CDAT IST 781594 PNEEN-2. . _ _ _- W Grim Data %2s-pr Lev 3- ;; h TitIP. ' d> 9' 94' OfRPACE TIsr. 7d/ ' @JL
- i e n s P CIIrf 74P '
A f' 4fB E IIMIIIDITY: &7M WfEM G NE, 1 9679: M.fe-T3 6 AEADeeGB s a sa e I e m,II. m. -A .I..- 90C3FIED-bM IIfA WIL thful M MAX. m MAN. M E4K. ~--" h PRIWW MAL CRAT St Pep 6 GG47 6 W. M an. as.s gramas ame._assa; m e. mais auds g- - - Phliff. @* TNT' l naTol nu.Een 9 f-tv e-u-sw AcT: anP.anTa er e47s axP.naft REJM5 AEJME g
- a. m-aw ys. av mimei a esm
. ara-as-ara-apa-ee-ma ann. .Mg,g,r ; coLos cooe co(/buidril
- r pn cooE cotos cooE cotos cooE cotos CosE coot cOATiPeG APPLIE0[l IM <C s/E lL)/
~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ K On e Da EFL Oa 01 D a 010a OL Da COATING ECW L _j s S _J s LJs I js L.l s TDIAL anst - YES [ YES VES [ Ytl [ YE5 [ YW 0096iR A1 sons E 1so eso k "hD esO 18 0 ago APP sea 105ts j TIS [ YES j % [ VES [ YES [ YES CRAALtl11D 80 0 IIO esO IID MD 1I0 PAIIIT copITRAC5 RhWI d 'l A fi 4 WY 22_ m CoseETR RJPW f' "^ -A M- .- d o- -~ fe - n c seese As'
- anguerf Pen aan anus
, esame spaAY kWOLL ]}}