ML17334A494

Rev 1 to Program Plan Rept for Detailed Control Room Design Review for Indiana & Michigan Electric Co,Dc Cook Units 1 & 2 to Nrc.

ML17334A494
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	12/02/1983
From:	AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP., CANYON RESEARCH CORP., WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17320A900	List: ML17320A899 ML17334A494
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 PROC-831202, NUDOCS 8401040196
Download: ML17334A494 (202)

Text

PROGRAMPLANREPORTforaDETAILEDCONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWforIndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyDonaldC.CookUnits1and2toTheUnitedStatesNuclearRegulatory Commission Revision1Oecember2,1983preparedbyAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation andWestinghouse

'lectricCorporation CanyonResearchGroup840i04019h 83i229,PDRADQCK050003i5F---'PDR TABLEOFCONTENTSSectionTitle~PaeINTRODUCTION l-l.General1-2.1-6.1-9.Background 1-3.PlantDescription 1"4.Definition ofControlRooms1-5.ControlRoomStatusScopeoftheProgramObjectives oftheProgramDCRDRProgramActivities Definition ofTerms1-21-21-21"31-31-41-51-7MANAGEMENT ANDSTAFFING2-1.Purpose2-2.DCRDRTeamInterfaces 2-3.Management Function2-4.ProjectReviewTeam2-5.DesignReviewTeam2-6.Assessment Team2-12-12-12-12-22-22-4DOCUMENTATION ANDDOCUMENTCONTROL3-1.Introduction 3-2.Reference Documentation 3-3.DCRDR-Generated Documentation 3-4.DocumentControl3-13-13"13-23-3DESCRIPTION OFPHASEI,PLANNING4-1.Introduction 4-2.DCRDRMilestones 4-3.ControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport4-14-14-16755B:1/112583 TABLEOFCONTENTS(cont)SectionTitle~paeDESCRIPTION OFPHASEII,REVIEW5-1.Introduction 5-2.ReviewPhaseStaffing5-3.Methodology forReviewPhaseTasks5-4.Task1--Operating Experience Review5-5.Task2-SystemFunctionandTaskAnalysis5-6.Task3-ControlRoomInventory, 5-7.Task4--ControlRoomHumanFactorsSurvey5-8.Workspace Survey5-9.Anthropometric Survey5-10.Emergency Equipment Survey5-11.Heating,Ventilating, andAirConditioning Survey5-12.Illumination Survey5-13.AmbientNoiseSurvey5-14.Maintainability Survey5-15.Communications Survey5-16.Annunciator SystemsReview5-17.ControlsSurvey5-18.DisplaysSurvey5-19.LabelsandLocationAids5-20.ComputerSystemReview5-21.Conventions Survey5-22.Task5--Verification ofControlRoomFunction5-23.Task6--Validation ofControlRoomFunctions 5-24.ProductsoftheReviewPhase5-15-15-15-25-25-35-35-35-45-45-55-45-55-55-55-55-65-65-65-65-65-75-75-75-76755B:1/112583 TABLEOFCONTENTS(cont)SectionTitle~PaeDESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-A,ASSESSMENT 6-1.Introduction 6-2.Methodology 6-16-16-2DESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-B,IMPLEMENTATION 7-1DESCRIPTION OFPHASEIV,REPORTING 8-1COORDINATION WITHNUREG0737,SUPPLEMENT 1,ACTIVITIES 9-110QUALITYASSURANCE 10-1SUMMARYAppendixALiSTOFABBREVIATIONS A-1AppendixBRESUMESOFKEYPERSONNEL B-lAppendixCANNUNCIATOR SURVEYTASKPLANC-16755B:1/112583 LISTOFILLUSTRATIONS Fi<iureTitie~PaeRelationship ofNUREG0660TaskActionItems1-2GeneralArrangement DrawingofDonaldC.CookUnits1and2ControlRooms1"3Functional LayoutDrawingofDonaldC.CookUnit1ControlRoomPanels1-13Functional LayoutDrawingofDonaldC.CookUnit2ControlRoomPanels1-151-5ListofAbbreviations andFunctions forControlPanels1-171-6FourMajorPhaseActivities fortheDCRORProgram1-192-1OCRDRProgramOrganization Structure 2-52-2DCRDRProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringPlanning2-72-3OCRORProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringReview2-9OCRORProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringAssessment 2-112"5OCRDRProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringImple-mentation 2-132-6DCRDRProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringReporting 2-154-1PlanningPhaseDevelopment Outline4-34-2OCRDRProgramScheduleforPhasesIandII4-56755B:1/112583 LISTOFILLUSTRATIONS (cont)~FiureTitle~pae6-1Assessment Methodology Chart6-36-2HumanEngineering Discrepancy Evaluation FlowChart6-56-3HEOCategoryGuidelines 6-78"1SampleofProgramSummaryReportFormat(2Sheets)8-39-1ScheduleofPerformance 9-36755B:1/112583viii SECTIONIINTRODUCTION 1-1.GENERALThisProgramPlanReportdescribes theplantoperformadetailedcontrolroomdesignreview(OCROR)oftheDonaldC.CookUnits1and2nuclearpowergeneration stationsoperatedbytheIndianaandMichiganElectricComoany(IEMECo).ThepurposeoftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramistostudyandevaluate, fromahumanengineering pointofview,thetotalcontrolroomworkspace,environment, instrumentation,

controls, andotherequipment forbothsystemdemandsandoperatorcapabilities andtoidentify, assess,andrecommend controlroomdesignmodifications/enhancements tocorrectidentified inadequacies intheexistingdesign.TheapproachoftheDCRORProgramwillbetoperformatotalreviewontheUnit1controlroom.ThenareviewoftheUnit2controlroomwillbedonetodetermine thedifferences betweenunits.TheUnit2controlroomreviewwillbebasedontheresultsoftheUnit1review,withalldifferences beingaddressed separately.

Therefore, thisreviewtechnique willensurethatallasoecsofheUnits1and2control.oomswillbeevaluated forhuaanrac:ors.Thisprogramispartofanintegrated plantoaddresstheTMI-related actionsreferenced inTMI-2ActionPlan,NUREG-0660.

Theplanwillincludeaconsideration oftherelationship ortheDCRORProgramwithNUREG0737,Supplement 1(figure1-1),including thefollowing:

I~Designing controlroommodifications whichcorrecconditions adversetosafety(reducing significant contributions torisk)andconsidering theadditionoftheinstrumentation necessary toimplement Regulatory Guide1.976755B:I/062883

~Verifying thesafetyparameter displaysystem(SPOS),datadisplay,andfunction~Usingselectedplant-specific, symptom-based emergency operating procedures forverifying andvalidating controlroomfunctions

~Communication interface withtheTechnical SupportCenter,Emergency Operations

Facility, andtheOperating SupportCenterIKMECohascommittedthenecessary resources, including Ynowleageable management andtechnical personnel fromtheplantstaff,AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation (AEPSC).technical consultants fromWestinghouse ElectricCorporation, andhumanactorsspecialists FromCanyonResearchGrouptoeffectheprogramcefinedherein.1-2.BACKGROUNO 1-3PlantOes-,i-tonTheIndianaanaMichiganElectricCompanyiscurrently ooerating atwo-unitnuclearpowerplantlocatedalongtheeasternshoreofLakeMichiganinLakeTownship, BerrienCounty,Michigan, approximateiy

'milessouth-sou hwestorBentonHarbor.ThisFaciliyhasbeendesignated theDonaldC.CookUr.i:s1and2wnichbegancommercial operation inAugustof1975andJulyor1979,'esoectively.

=achunitcontainssWestinghouse-supplied four-loop nuclearsteamsuoplysystem(Unit1-3250M<t,1030KdeNetandUnit2-3411'Kft,1100i&feNet).

'oneturbinegenerators forUnits1and2wererurnisned oyGeneral"=;ectric ancBrownBoveri,respectively.

Thearchitect~'engineer Forbothuni:sisAEPSC.1-4.Oefinition ofControlRoomsTheOonaldC.CookUnits1and2controlroomsareessentially identical.

Thecontrolroomforeachunitisdefined,ForthepurposesoftheOCRDRProgram,6755B:I/0628831-2 asthepanelsandotherequipment inthemaincontrolboardareaincluding theSPDSdisplaysandthehotshutdownpanels.Ageneralarrangement drawingisillustrated infigure1-2;functional layoutdrawingsofthecontrolroompanelsareshowninfigures1-3and1-4,andacomprehensive tabulation ofthismaterialisshowninfigure1-5.1"5.ControlRoomStatusThemaincontrolboardsareoperational andcompleteexceptforthoseareasofactivitywhicharenowbeingperformed toaddresstherequirements setforthbyNUREG0737,Supplement 1.1-6.SCOPEOFTHEPROGRAMTheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramcoversthehumanengineering reviewoftheverticaloperational andassociated hotshutdownpanelsidentified inparagraph 1-4,andthecontrolroomworkspace andenvironment.

Theequipment tobereviewedincludesalldisplays,

controls, peripheral

consoles, communication equipment, ancillary devices,andothermaincontrolboardcomponents withwhichthecontrolroomoperators interface.

Duringthereviewprocess,thegovernment regulations andguidelines listedbelowandotherrelatedindustrystandards andguidelines willbeusedforinformation orbackground:

~NUREG0659(staffsupplement to1580)~NUREG0660(actionplanasaresultofTMI-2accident)

~NUREG0694(TMI-related requirement fornewoperating licensees)

~NUREG0696(functional criteriaforemergency responsefacilities)"

~NUREG0700(controlroomhumanengineering guidelines)

~NUREG0737(clarification ofTMIactionplanrequirements) 6755B:I/062883 1-3

~NUREG0737,Supplement I(requirements foremergency responsecapability) eNUREG0801(draftevaluation criteriaforcontrolroomdesignreview)~NUREG0814(methodology forevaluation ofemergency responsefacilities)

~NUREG0835(humanfactorsacceptance criteriaforSPDS)~NUREG0899(guidelines forthepreparation ofemergency operating procedures)

~Regulatory Guide1.47(bypassed andinoperable statusindication)

~Regulatory Guide1.97,Revision2(postaccident monitoring instrumentation) 1-7.OBJECTIVES OFTHEPROGRAMTheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramwillbeconducted toachievethefollowing objectives:

~Determine whethertheexistingcontrolroomdesignprovidesthesystemstatusinformation, controlcapabilities,

feedback, andanalytical aidsnecessary forcontrolroomoperators toperformtheirfunctions effectively

~Identifycharacteristics oftheexistingcontrolroominstrumentation,

controls, otherequipment, andphysicalarrangements whichmaysignificantly impair/impede controlroomoperatorperformance

~Analyzeandevaluatetheproblemswhichcouldoccurduringemergency conditions, andidentifymeansofcorrecting thosediscrepancies whichcouldleadtosubstantial operational orsafetyconcerns6755B:I/062883 1-4

~Verifyandvalidatetheproposedmeansofcorrection toprovideaneffective planofactionwhichapplieshumanfactorsprinciples toimprovethecontrol'oom designandenhanceoperatorefficiency andeffectiveness

~Integrate theOCRDRProgramwithotherareaofhumanfactorsidentified intheNRCTaskActionPlan~Provideeffective coordination ofcontrolroomenhancements and/ormodifications withidentifications ofNUREG0696andRegulatory Guide1.97considerations, plantoperating/emergency procedures development, andtheimplementation oftrainingasnecessary toensurethatcontrolroomoperators canfunctionadequately withanycontrolroomdesignchanges~EnsurethattheresultsofthistotaleffortmeettheintentofNUREG0737,ItemI.D.l,andNUREG0700.Inaddition, performtheOCRORProgramcognizant ofthesedocuments asclarified inNUREG0737,Supplement 1,Item5.2.a1-8.OCRORPROGRAMACTIVITIES Thedesignreviewprocesswilladdressfourmajorphasesofactivity(figure1-6):oPHASEIPLANNiNG(section,4).TheProgramPlanReportfortheD.C.CookUnits1and2DCRORandthepreliminary ControlRoomHumanEngineering Criteria(CRHEC)Reportwillprovidethebasisforthedesignreview.~PHASEII--REVIEW(section.5).DuringtheReview'hase, datawillbecollected, reduced,andanalyzedtoobserveanddocumentwhethertheexistingcontrolroomdesignprovidesoperators withthecapabilities necessary toperformtheirfunctionandtasksundernormaland67558:1/062883 1-5 emergency operating conditions.

ResultsofPhaseIIactivitywillgeneratetasksummaryreportsandalistingofdepartures fromtheControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport.~PHASEIII-A-ASSESSMENT (section6).Ouringthisphase,anassessment willbemadeofthesignificance andimpactofthedepartures fromtheCRHECreportsidentified inPhaseII.Forthose'departures assessedassignifi-cant,recommended designchanges/enhancements willbedeveloped.

oPHASEIII-B--IMPLEMENTATION (section7).Aftertheassessment hasIIbeencompleted andallcorrective actionsidentified, aschedulewillbedeveloped toensuretheintegration oftheproposedcontrolroomchangeswithotherpost-TMIprograms, refueling outages,andothercompanymodifications.

~PHASEIVREPORTING (section8).AProgramSummaryReportwillbepreparedwhichwilldocumenttheoverallreviewprocess,describeandidentifyallofthehumanengineering discrepancies'and

findings, andsummarize allOCRORactivities, methodologies, andproposedcontrolroomimprovements andschedules.

Eachphasewillbeperformed byateamofspecialists fromI&MECo,AEPSC,Westinghouse, andCanyonResearchGroup.Oisciplines represented ontheteamwillincludeinstrumentation andcontrolengineering, nuclearsafetyandli-censing,electrical engineering, humanfactors,plantoperations, qualityassurance, projectengineering, andtrainingtomaximizetheefficiency oftheeffortandtocompletethetotalreviewidentified inthisProgramPlanReport.6755B:I/062883 1-6 I"9.DEFINITION OFTERMSAlistofabbreviations andacronymsiscontained inappendixAtothisreport.Also,toalleviate ambiguity ofterms,thefollowing definitions areprovided:

ControlRoomEnhancement.

Achangetoapiece'ofequipment, suchasacontrolpanel,whichcanbeperformed withoutinterfering withtheoperation ofthatequipment.

Suchchangesmightincludetheapplication oflabelsordemarcation lines.ControlRoomModification.

Achangetoapieceofequipment, suchasacontrolpanel,whichislikelytointerfere withtheoperation ofthatequipment onwhichthechangeisbeingperformed.

Suchchangesincludetheremovalorrelocation ofanexistingcontrolpanelcomponent ortheadditionofapanelcomponent.

EmerencOperatinProcedures.

Plantprocedures whichguide,theoperator(s) duringatransient oremergency condition.

EmerencResponseGuidelines.Symptom-based guidelines fromwhichemergency operating procedures aredeveloped.

HumanEnaineerin

.Thescienceofoptimizing theperformance ofhumanbeingsandthedesignofequipment formoreefficient usebyhumanbeings'uman Enoineerin Discreanc.Adeparture fromtheestablished humanfactorscriteriaforthecontrolroomdesignwhichcouldimpair/impede operatorperformance.

Photomosaic.

Ascaledphotographic reproduction ofthemaincontrolroompanels.SafetParameter DislaSstem.Displaysystemwhichprovidescontinuous indication ofplantparameters toassistcontrolro'ompersonnel inevaluating thesafetystatusoftheplant.6755B:I/0628831-7 Validation.

Theprocessofdetermining whetherthephysicaldesignsupportstheprocedures foroperation inanadequatemannertosupporteffective integrated performance ofthefunctions ofthecontrolroomoperating crew.Verification.

Theprocessofdetermining whetherinstrumentation,

controls, andotherequipment meetthespecificrequirements ofthetasksperformed byoperators.

6755B:1/062883 PLANT'CIFICEMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES (EOPs)NUREG0899SYMPTOM-BASED OPERATING ANDEMERGENCY PROCEDURES NUREG0799NUREG0660I.C.1,I.C.8,&I.C.9CHANGESINREQUIREMENTSFORTRAININGANDSTAFFINGNUREG0660I.A.1&IA.2TMIACTIONPLANNUREG0660NUREG0737DETAILEDCONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWPRELIMINARY CONTROLROOMHUMANENGINEERING CRITERIAREPORTPROGRAMPLANREPORTNUREG0700PRCAPERTURECARDDCRDRPROGRAM SUMMARYREPORT'OST-ACCIDENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION REG.GUIDE1.97'AlsoAvailable 6zApertureCardSAFETYPARAMETER DISPLAYSYSTEMNUBEG0660,III,A.12NUREG0835EMERGENCY RESPONSEFACILITYNUREG0696NUREG0814Figurel-l.Relationship ofNUREG0660TaskActionItems1-9s401040196

-o) 0PN UNIT1CONTROLROOMUNIT2CONTROLROOMUNIT2HOTSHUTDOWNAREAUNIT1HOTSHUTDOWNAREAFigure1-2.GeneralArrangement DrawingofDonaldC.CookUnits1and2ControlRooms BARCOTUSGPRZFPRCPCPRHROPERATOR'S CONSOLEPSSOCRTASISSPYPSSCRTBRMSBISICRTCRTCRTCCWESWNESWCOMPUTEROPERATOR'S CONSOLETYPEWRITER SANISIVVSSVEFRMSCABINETFFCMFXAPOMSFlCWFigure1-3.Functional LayoutOrawingofOonaldC.CookUnit1ControlRoomPanels6755B:1/0628831-13 PANELFFCMFXAPDMSFIDCABINETCWSVEFVSIVNISSANESWTYPEWRITER

+COMPUTEROPERATOR'S CONSOLEESWCCWBISIBISIRMSCRTCRTPSSDCRTBSPYSISCPPSSDCRTAOPERATOR'S CONSOLERHRRCPFPPRZSGDTURCFLXBAFigure1-4.Functional LayoutDrawingofDonaldC.CookUnit2ControlRoomPanels67558:1/062883 1-15 FLXRCOTUSGFPCPSABAPRZRCPRHRSISSPYCCWESWFluxPanelRodControlPanelOe)taTandUnitPanelSteamGenerator PanelFeedPumpPanelCondensate Polishing PanelCondensate PanelTurbinePanelStationAuxiliary PanelGenerator PanelBoricAcidPanelPressurizer PanelReactorCoolantPumpPanelResidualHeatRemovalPanelSafety'injection SystemPanelContaiqment SprayPanelComponent CoolingWaterPanelEssential ServiceWaterPanelNESW-Nonessential ServiceWaterPanelIVVSEFSVNISFIRMSFFCMFXAPMSFIDRMSCWIsolation ValvesPanelVents.latlon PanelEmergency FirePanelPlantServicePanelNuclearInstrumentation CabinetsFixedIn-CorePanelRadiation Monitoring SystemPanelFailedFuelCommunications PanelMovableIn-coreCabinetAxialPowerDistribution Monitoring SystemCabinetFixedIn-coreCabinetRadiation Monitoring SystemCabinetCirculating WaterPanelFigureI"5.ListofAbbreviations andFunctionforControlPanels6755B:I/062883 1-17 ugQIz0ZUJa2cgCg5zUgCLCL+CaCaCCCa>OOOOCCCa0Z.CLug00.Coa:20II2ug0CLChz0IOOCC2agag'D22Ezcn00IOOIUOILZ~gI-0UgI2ulcnlu0OQZJugugzE~a~CCnugulooluUlCnDluggIL~~cn0ca220ID0ICn208t'TIILI<Icaa.(-5O)Qm]I>UgIch>)L(Jo+0OoUg0Zca>ZcaOzOzOZILcaOg00caI-Zl-gl-oIOlu0g2oguoZ~X..-~cucnug~IUlu~gcnZZ<)I-I-Oolu0CCZUJCL~ugca~o<ca<zox wc@InviaUJ20ID0CnID200zoO2gzI20II2I0I0cn<2IL00hl-CLEOCZDC)20IO2E0OOcaIO2zCJ022020CCD2IZIuOIu324gz82g02CCoo0ggOI-iogvzCCgIlgg0IUgluluI~>2cav0UgNOgcn2ca-QWQI5ICCcn20-2IUOIUE~C0CJCaIQZQ0cC4caaug0.0.caQPgOzCaOOZCCCCg'2Oa.UgY)calu0OQ2luOQlZIU0,coQOzl-22Ug~UugILca300caIZCLIL2CaIOOCUCaIVIUQ2+2CLugcaca~a<2~O.ZUJ<OgzaCCUl)CUE~lugaoca00.ZVYcaIXIU0ZcaZQgOcaI00>CCu.CJCaKx<CLUliIca)~COIQ~0~2luz~caa:COOI-zca2+~ZCC00.5caI-UJQlucfO0I->ILa:~CC0zoIuI-0QcgtcocaQ0gI>2cacnIL0UICJUJIgZYVIu00Iu0gaZZILUgO20IIUO0I~ILIUCL02CC22Ul2CCIOQugDozzu.0.I~R0oOu.2CCII-UgOoCLUJ~IUl(yO2ooIL-CacnZCaPuQO-coVzUgILCCN0CU>cnUga2cazX~QCnol<~u00Ugcap<00.ILozcn0CCIZOQZ<u.2IU~IUugIuzozozUgILZQZo8~~Iul~QcaZCn02ozozol=$zcagEa:CCPy400caca0II220UgVQUJIUI<0IP2ECaCaCCCao020ca02a.OKRaIZCClgJOg00.Icag000luO~CQ2caIL2I0D2cnCC0.Co2CCI-zo0.UgQCnZ0I0IUILIUIUIZ:zzQOo~~ugIU1CLIIzIII20I~CzI-o2-luI0.0.FgoOPRCAPERTURECAROI0oIL2DZOQ200a.~,0g~gaableOILApertureCard$-0$-0ncclcoI1-198401040196W~2 04t~(f~U, SECTION2MANAGEMENT ANDSTAFFING2-1.PURPOSEThepurposeofthissectionistoidentifytheOCRORProgramteamsandtheirareasofresponsibility.

Figure2-1detailstheorganizational structure ofpersonnel involvedintheOCRORProgram.(}ualifications ofkeypersonnel areprovidedinappendixB.Allpersonnel ontheDonaldC.CookOCRDRProgramteamswillmeetorexceedthequalifications providedinNUREG0801andrelatedguidance.

2-2.DCRDRTEAMINTERFACE Toeffectively performtheDCRORProgramandstillbeabletobesuccessfully audited,aninterface betweenthevariousreviewteamsisrequired.

The"OCRDRProgramLeadEngineer" willbetheprimarycontactandliasionforthemanagement organization, designreview,projectreview,andassessment teams.Figures2-2through2-6showthesevariousinterfaces.

2-3.MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONThemanagement functionfortheOCRDRProgramwillbeprovidedunderpreviously established AEPSCprocedural requirements andresponsibilities definedinAEPSCGeneralProcedure 25,"Engineering DesignChanges,"

andGeneralProcedure 32,"Preparation ofSubmittals totheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission."

Thefunctionofmanagement isto:~Approvethe'Program PlanReport~Reviewandapproverecommendatons forcontrolroomdesignchangesI6755B:I/062883 2-1

~Providetheresources necessary forimplementation oftheDCROR~ApprovetheProgramSummaryReport~Providethemechanism forthepreparation andsubmittal ofdocuments totheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission.,

2-4.PROJECTREVIEWTEAMTheProjectReviewTeamwillcoordinate theDCRORProgram.Typicalteamfunctions areto:~ApproveTaskPlanspriortoperformance ofassociated ReviewTaskA~EnsurethattheDCRDRProgramisperformed inaccordance withtheAEPSCgualityAssurance Program~ProvideoverallsupporttotheDCRORprocess~MonitortheDCRORprogressoEnsurethatthedesignreviewobjectives andtasks,inrelationtootherNUREG0660efforts,areproperlycoordinated

~Establish andinitiateacontrolroomimprovement programKeypersonnel fortheProjectReviewTeamareidentified infigure2-1.2-5.DESIGNREVIEWTEAMTheDesignReviewTeamcomprises thequalified multidiscipline personnel toperformthevariousreviewfunctions.

Theareasofexpertise include:~NSSSandbalance-of-plant systems~Instrumentation andcontrol6755B:1/062883r2-2

~Conrolboarddesign~Humanfactors~Plantoperations (licensed operators)

~Training~Licensing/nuclear safetyThefunctionoftheDesignReviewTeamistocarryouttheentiredesignreviewprograminaccordance withtheguidelines detailedinthisProgramPlanReport.DesignReviewTeamresponsibilities includethefollowing:

~DeveloptheProgramPlanReport~DeveloptheLicenseeEventReportReviewReport~DeveloptheControlRoomInventory

~Developforms/checklists

~DevelopTaskPlansoDevelopControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReportoPerformReviewTasks~DevelopTaskSummaryReports~AssistAssessment Teamastechnical support~,DevelopImplementation Plans~DeveloptheProgramSummaryReport6755B:I/062883 2-3 Keypersonnel fortheDesignReviewTeamareidentified infigure2-1.2-6.ASSESSMENT TEAMTheAssessment Teamwill:~Evaluatethesignificance oftheobserveddepartures fromtheCRHECReportidentified inthePhaseIIreview~Identifytheapplicable departures ashumanengineering discrepancies (HED)~AssignacategoryandprioritytotheHEDsforscheduling ofcorrective action~Review/approve controlroomrecommendations forHEDcorrective actionpriortoorigination ofarequestforchange(AEPSCprocedure 25).Keypersonnel fortheAssessment Teamareidentified infigure2-1.6755B:I/0628832-4 P10J1CZREVIZÃTEAM*DCBDRProgramMninistrator:

A.S.Grims*DCRDRProgramLeadEngineer:

R.F.Shoemaker

• DCRDRProgramPlantCoordinator:

T.R.Stephens*DCRDRProgramProjectEngineer:

F.VanPelt,Jr.*DCRDRProgramManager(Westinghouse):

J.D.Young*~SCHumanFactorsConsultant:

Dr.T.SheridanDESIGNREVI1%TEAM*DCRDRProgramAdministrator:

A.S.Grieves*DCBDRProgramLeadEngineer/AEPSC I&CEngineer:

R.F.Shor*AEPSCNuclearSafety&Licensing Engineer:

K.J.Toth*I&MEG3ReactorOperators

• DCRDRProgramPlantCoordinator:

T.R.Stephens*AEPSCQualityAssurance Engineer:

J.B.Brittan~*DCRDRProgramProjectEngineer:

F.VanPelt,Jr.*AEPSCElectrical Engineer:

L.P.~co*DCRDRProgramManager(Westinghouse):

J.D.Young*DCRDRHumanFactorsConsultant (CanyonResearch):

Dr.G.A.Elliff*I&MECO&Westinghouse TrainingPersonnel

• Westinghouse TrainingPersonnel:

R.J.Wartenberg ASSESSMENT TEAM*DCRDRProgramAdnunistrator:

A.S.Grimes*DCRDRProgramLeadEngineer:

R.F.Shor*AEPSCI&CSectionManager:J.C.Jeffrey*AEPSCNuclearSafetyandLicensing SectionManager:J.G.Feinstein

• D.C.CookPlantManagemnt:B.A.Svensson*AEPSCHumanFactorsConsultant:

Dr.T.Sheridan*I&MECOSeniorReactorOperator(s)

• ArPSCManagerofQualityAssurance:

R.F.Kroeger*AEPSCElectrical Generation SectionManager:R.C.CarruthFigure2-1.DCRDRProgramOrganization Structure 6755B:1/062883 2-5

DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~PREPAREPROGRAMPLANREPORTPROJECTREVIEWTEAMI~APPROVEPROGRAMPLANREPORTPROGRAMPLANREPORTACCEPTABLE SUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENTS YESAEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.32"PREPARATION OFSUBMITTALS TONRC"MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION

~SUBMITPROGRAMPLANREPORTTONRCPROGRAMPLANREPORTNRC6755B:I/070583 Figure2-2.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseI,Planning2-7 DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~DEVELOPTASKPLAN~DEVELOPCONTROLROOMINVENTORY

~PERFORMREVIEW~DEVELOPLERREVIEWREPORT~~DEVELOPTASKSUMMARYREPORT~DEVELOPFORMS/CHECKLISTS

~DEVELOPCRHECREPORTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT PROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/APPROVE/COMMENT

-TASKSUMMARYREPORT-FORMS/CHECKLISTS NOTASKSUMMARYREPORTACCEPTANCE YESINPUTTOPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTSEEFIGURE2406755B:I/070583eFigure2-3.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseII,Review2-9 ASSESSMENT TEAM~DETERMINE SIGNIFICANCE OFHEDS~REVIEW/APPROVECONTROLROOMENHANCEMENTS/

RETROFITS DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~ASSISTINHEDEVALUATION

~DEVELOPFINALCRHECDOCUMENTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT PROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/COMMENT/APPROVE

-FINALCRHECDOCUMENT-ASSESSMENT REPORTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT NOASSESSMENT REPORTACCEPTANCE YESINPUTTOPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTSEEFIGURE2.60Figure2-4.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseIII-A,Assessment 6755B:I/070583 2-11 SUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT NOCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTACCEPTABLE YESASSESSMENT TEAM~DEVELOPCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORT~DEVELOPIMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULEDESIGNREVIEWTEAM~ASSISTINDEVELOPMENT OFCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORT~ASSESSCONTROLROOMIMPROVEMENTSFORDEPARTURES FROMTHECRHECDOCUMENTPROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/COMMENT APPROVECONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORTAEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.25"ENGINEERING DESIGNCHANGE"MANAGEMENT FUNCTION~REVIEW/APPROVE CONTROLROOMENHANCEMENTS/

MODIFICATIONS SEEFIGURE24CFigure2-5.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseIII-B,Implementation 6755B:I/070583 2-13 DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~DEVELOPPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT PROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/COMMENT/

APPROVEPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTACCEPTABLE YESNOASSESSMENT REPORTSFROMFIGURE24BTASKSUMMARYREPORTSFROMFIGURE2.3APROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTMANAGEMENT FUNCTION~APPROVEPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORT~SUBMITPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTTONRCCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORTFROMFIGURE2-5CAEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.32"PREPARATION OFSUBMITTALS TONRC"PROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTNRCFigure2-6.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseIV,Reporting 6755B:I/070583 2-15 SECTION3DOCUMENTATION ANDDOCUMENTCONTROL3-1.INTRODUCTION Acompleteandup-to-date libraryofreference information isnecessary tomanageandperformthevariousphasesoftheDCRDRProgram.Thislibrarywillprovidesupportduringthedesignreviewaswellasadatabaseforfuturecontrolroommodifications.

3"2.REFERENCE DOCUMENTATION Thefollowing documentation willbeusedduringthereviewphase:~.Controlroomdrawings(panellayouts,floorplan,andthelike)~Controlboardequipment specifications

~Controlpanelphotographs (photomosaic)

~Controlroompreliminary assessments

~Description ofcodingconventions

~OriginalandUpdatedFSARforD.C.CookUnits1and2~Instrumentation andcontroldiagrams~Operatortrainingmaterial~Systemsfunctiontaskanalysis6755B:1/0628833-1

~Listsofacronymsandabbreviations

~Pipingandinstrumentation drawings~Plantcomputersoftwaredescription andsampleprintout~Procedures (emergency, normal,andthelike)~Systemdescriptions

~Regulatory guidesandNUREGs(paragraph 1-6)~Controlroominventory list~AEPSCqualityassurance procedure

~LicenseeeventreportsAnyadditional reference materialidentified bythedesignreviewteamduringthereviewphase(PhaseII)willbeobtainedandaddedtothelibrary.BecauseO.C.CookUnits1and2areoperating, accesstothecontrolroomswillbelimited.Therefore, photomosaics willbeusedtaperformmostofthetasksoutlinedinsection5.3-3.OCROR-GENERATEO DOCUMENTATION Thedocumentation generated bythedesignreviewprocesswillbesubjecttothosecontrolsidentified inparagraph 3-4.Thefollowing documentation willbeproducedbytheOCRORprocess:oProgramPlanReport(thisdocument)

~Controlroomoperating personnel surveys6755B:I/062883 3-2

~Controlroominventory

~Controlroomhumanfactorsurveys~Taskplans,checklists, datacollection forms,sketches, photographs, andphotomosaics usedinthereviewand.assessment/recommendation phases~Controlroomhumanengineering criteriareport~Licenseeeventreport(LER)review~ProgramSummaryReport3-4.DOCUMENTCONTROLAcontrolled-access filewillbeestablished forallhardcopyDCRDRProgramoutputdocuments.

Inaddition, thesedocuments willbeenteredintoacomputer-based datasystem.Accesstothesefileswillbecontrolled bytheDCRDRprogrammanager.67558:1/062883 3-3 P.Ill SECTION4DESCRIPTION OFPHASEI,PLANNING4-I.INTRODUCTION Theplanningphaseconsistsofdeveloping awell-defined workprogramwhichoutlinesspecificrecommendations forpersonnel, reference

material, anddocumentation neededtoperformtheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgram(figure4-1).IEMECointendstocommencewiththeDCRDRProgramasdocumented inthisProgramPlanReportpriortoformalacceptance bytheNRC.Anydeficiencies notedinthisProgramPlanReportshouldbebroughttotheattention ofaI&MECoinatimelymanner.Finalacceptance ofthisdocumentwillendthePlanningPhase.4-2.DCRDRMILESTONES AscheduleforPhasesIandIIofthisProgramPlanwasdeveloped andisincludedasfigure4-2.AsstatedintheI8MECoresponsetoG.L.82-33(AEP:NRC:0773) onApril15,1983,anintermediate milestone responsewillbesumittedtotheNRCwiththecurrentstatusoftheDCRDRProgramonSeptember 1,1984.Atthattime,PhasesIandIIwillbeessentially completed, andanestimateforthePhaseIII-AAssessment willbedeveloped shortlythereafter.

TheNRCwillbeprovidedwithmoredetailedinformation regarding PhaseIII-AAssessment schedule(inanotherintermediate milestone response) whenthisestimatehasbeenmadeandtheevaluation ofitiscompleted.

4-3.CONTROLROOMHUMANENGINERING CRITERIAREPORTwAtthebeginning ofthereviewphase,apreliminary ControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReportwillbedeveloped.

Thispreliminary criteriareportwillcontain,asabaseline, detailedTaskPlanswhichwillbeexecutedtocompletespecificPhaseIIReviewTaskswithintheDCRDRProgram.TheTask6755B:I/0628834-1 Planshavebeenproveneffective onover20humanfactorscontrolroomreviews.TheTaskPlanswillprovideadetailedaudittrailtothegenericguidelines providedinNUREG0700,yethavebeenrestructured tofacilitate thedatacollection, documentation, andauditingrequirements inherentinaNUREG0700orientedDCRDRProgram.Basedonobservations andassessments oftheDCRDRProgram,thegenericguidelines ofNUREG0700foundinthepreliminary CRHECReportwillberevisedtoreflectplant-specific designconventions andplant-specific humanfactorscriteria.

AsectionofthefinalCRHECReportwillbededicated todepartures fromNUREG0700withtheapplicable justification providedtherein.ThefinalCRHECReportisintendedtoensurethatanyfuturecontrolboardmodifications reflectpreviously evaluated humanfactorspractices anddonotdetractfromoperability ofthecontrolboard.6755B:1/0628834-2 REVIEWOVERALLDCRDRPROGRAMOBJECTIVES EVALUATEOBJECTIVES

&DESIGNGUIDELINES TOBEUSEDIDENTIFYRESOURCES REQUIREDOUTLINEALLREVIEWTASKSTOBEPERFORMED ASPARTOFTHEDCRDRPROGRAMDEVELOPTHEDCRDRPROGRAMSCHEDULEISSUEPROGRAMPLANREPORT~ASSESSACTIVITIESCOMPLETED BYAEPSCANDl&MECo~EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES

,~DESIGNCRITERIAINCLUDING PLANTSPECIFICITEMS~NUREG066007000801~DEFINEPROGRAMSTHATHAVEANIMPACTONCONTROLROOMDESIGN(NUREG0696,REGULATORY GUIDE1.97)~DEFINERELATIONSHIP WITHOTHEREMERGENCY RESPONSEACTIVITY~PRELIMINARY CRHECREPORT~FINALSAFETYANALYSISREPORT~SYSTEMDESCRIPTIONS

~PIPINGANDINSTRUMENTATION DRAWINGS~FLOORPLANS~PANELLAYOUTS~ABBREVIATIONS ANDCODING'SOFTWAREDESCRIPTIONS

~PROCEDURES

~OPERATORTRAININGANDEXPERIENCE

~TASK1-OPERATING EXPFRIENCE REVIEW~TASK2'-SYSTEMFUNCTIONS REVIEWANDTASKANALYSIS~TASK3-CONTROLROOMINVENTORY

~TASK4-CONTROLROOMHUMANFACTORSURVEY~TASK5-VERIFICATION OFTASKPERFORMANCE

~TASK6-VALIDATION OFCONTROLROOMFUNCTIONS

~AEPSCANDl&MECoINPUTSTOSCHEDULE~REVIEWPROCESS~METHODOLOGY

~TEAMQUALIFICATIONS

~DESIGNGUIDELINES

~SCHEDULE~INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS OFPARTICIPANTS

~DOCUMENTATION ANDDOCUMENTCONTROLPRC.;APERTURE CAROFigure4-1.PlanningPhaseDevelopment OutlineI4-38401040i96~Q

]~>CQ7 19831984MAYJUNEJULYAUGSEPTOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNEJULYAUGSEPTOCTNOVDECJUNE27PLANNINGPHASEI~PLANNINGPPRToNRCPPRToNRCJAN1PHASEII-REVIEWTASK1LERREVIEWCROPSLERREVIEWSEPT1OCT1NOV1CROPSJAN2CROPSMAY22JUNE1TASK2SFRTATASK3CRITASK4CRHFSTASK5VERIFICATION TASK6VALIDATION PHASEIIIDETAILEDESTIMATION CRISEPT1OCTIMAR22JAN29MAR25iUNITNo.2)OUTAGECRHFSNOTE1JUNE30JULY14AUG15VERIF.SEPT1OCT6OCT20VALID.NOV1NOV22COMPLIESWITHSUPPLEMENT 1NUREG0737 PARAGRAPH 52.A"LICENSEES SHALLSUBMITPROGRAMPLANWITHINTWOMONTHSFROMSTARTOFDCRDR."~AEPSCANDINDIANAANDMICHIGANACTIVITY~~DCRDRREVIEWTEAMACTIVITYNOTE1CRHFSACTIVITIES MAYOCCURINPARALLELWITHCROPS.CRHFSSUMMARYREPORTDUEJUNE30,1984.Figure4-2.DCRDRProgramScheduleforPhasesIandII SECTION5DESCRIPTION OFPHASEII,REVIEW5-1.INTRODUCTION DuringtheReviewPhaseoftheD.C.CookDCRDRProgram,datawillbecollected andhumanfactorsissueswillbereviewed.

Thus,theobjective oftheReviewPhaseisthecollection ofdataidentifying attributes oftheD.C.CookUnits1and2controlroomswhichdepartfromcriteriaspecified intheD.C.CookControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport(paragraph 4-3).TheReviewPhasewillgenerate:

oTaskSummaryReportsforeachmajorreviewphasetaskspecifying methodsusedandfindings~Component sheetsspecifying thefindingsofeachtaskrelatedtoeachcomponent inthecontrolroom~Checklist observation formsdocumenting departures fromthehumanengineering criteriaestablished beforeandduringthereviewphase5-2.REVIEWPHASESTAFFINGTheReviewPhasewillbeconducted bytheDesignReviewTeam.Representatives ofI&MECo,AEPSC,Westinghouse, andCanyonResearchGroupwillbeincludedontheteam.Appropriate disciplines fromtheseorganizations willbeincludedoneachtaskteam.DesignReviewTeammembersinclude:~Systemdesigners andanalysts~Humanfactorsconsultants

~Controlboarddesigners 6755B:1/0628835-1

~Instrumentation andcontrolengineers

~Plantoperators

~Licensing engineers

~Datamanagement technicians

~Electrical engineers

~gualityassurance engineers 5-3.METHODOLOGY FORREVIEWPHASETASKSThemethodology fortheReviewPhasetaskswillconsistofexecuting TaskPlansandcompleting humanengineering surveysasreflected intheD.C.CookControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport.5-4.Task1--0eratinExerienceReviewTheoperating experience reviewconsistsoftworelatedactivities.

Thefirstisareviewofplantperformance recordsforD.C.CookUnits1and2(andareviewofLERsforothersimilarplants)toidentifyareasinwhichhumanerrorhascausedproblemsinthepastthatmayberelatedtocontrolpaneldesign.ThesecondactivityistheControlRoomOperating Personnel Survey(CROPS).TheDesignReviewTeamwillinterview arepresentative sampleconsisting ofatleast50percentofthelicensedcontrolroomoperators atD.C.CookUnits1and2.Theobjective oftheCROPSistoidentifyspecificattributes oftheD.C.CookUnits1and2.controlboarddesignwhich,intheoperators'pinions, havecausedorcouldpotentially causeoperatorerror.TheCROPSwillbeconducted byadmini'stration ofquestionnaires andbyconducting individual andgroupinterviews.

6755B:1/0628835-2 5-5.Task2-SstemFunctionandTaskAnalsisTheSystemFunctionandTaskAnalysiswillestablish instrumentation requirements andperformance criteriaforselectnormalandemergency conditions.

Thistaskwillbeperformed byusingplant-specific procedures generated fromtheWestinghouse Owners'roup Emergency ResponseGuidelines.

Theseplant-specific procedures willbesubmitted totheDesignReviewTeam.ThisdatawillprovideinputtotheDesignReviewTeamfortheverification andvalidation ofcontrolroomfunctions (Tasks5and6).5-6.Task3-ControlRoomInventorThecontrolroominventory willbedeveloped onacomputerdatabaseandwillincludealldatarequiredbyNUREG0700foreachcomponent.

AEPSCwi11developandmaintaintheD.C.CookControlRoomInventory database.Formatsandcompleteness ofthedataitemlisthavebeenreviewedbyallreviewteammembersandcommentshavebeenincorporated toensurethattheinventory databasetosupportrelevantD.C.CookDCRDRProgramtaskscanbeaccepted.

5-7'.Task4-ControlRoomHumanFactorsSurveThebulkofthedetaileddataregarding specificdepartures fromtheControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReportwillbegatheredintheControlRoomSurveysTask.TheControlRoomSurveysTaskwillbeconducted bycompleting 14humanengineering surveysasfollows:~Workspace eAnthropometrics

~Emergency equipment

~Heating,ventilating, andairconditioning

~Illumination 6755B:I/062883 5-3

~AmbientnoiseoMaintainabi 1ity~Communications

~Annunciator

~Controls~Displays~Labelsandlocationaids~Computersystemreview~Conventions DetailedTaskPlans,checklists, specialdatacollection forms,NUREG0700criteriareferences applicable toD.C.Cook,andmethodology descriptions foreachsurveywillbeincludedintheCRHECReport.TheAnnunciator SurveyTaskPlanisincludedinthisProgramPlanReportinappendixCasanexample.5-8.WorksaceSurve--Thissurveyconcentrates onthegenerallayoutandarrangement ofcontrolroomequipment.

Theworkspace surveywillalsoaddresstheadequacyofcontrolroomnoninstrumentation itemssuchasdesksandchairs.5-9.AnthroometricSurve--Theanthropometric surveywillassessanddocumentthevisionandreachenvelopes forallD.C.Cookcontrolroomequipment.

Thisdatawillbeevaluated forgeneralcontrolanddisplaylocationadequacybasedupontheCRHECReportanthropometric criteriaforthe5thpercentile femaleand95thpercentile male.Inaddition, theanthropo-metricdatawillbeusedtosupporttheverification andvalidation tasks.6755B:I/0628835-4 5-10.EmerencEuimentSurve-Emergency equipment willbeevaluated forusability bythecontrolroomoperators.

Includedwillbeanassessment ofemergency equipment storagelocations; operatoraccessability; tactile,visual,andauditoryadequacyofbreathing apparatus andprotective clothing; andothercriticalfeaturesofthecontrolroomemergency equipment.

5-11.HeatinVentilatinandAirConditionin Surve""Theailflow,temperature regulation, andhumiditycontrolwithinthecontrolroomwillbeevaluated intermsoftheCRHECReport.Theprimaryconcernistoidentifyparameters whichmaybeoutoftolerance orunstabletothepointofadv'ersely

,affecting therecommended comfortzonesforthecontrolroom.5-12.Illumination Surve-Ambientillumination willbemeasuredusingappropriate instruments forlightinglevelsatvariousworkstations andcontrolboardareas.Presenceofglare,ifany,oninstrumentation willbedocumented.

Illumination willbeevaluated forcompliance withrecommended andrequiredlightlevelsforidentified tasks.5-13.AmbientNoiseSurve--Ambientnoisewillbemeasur'ed usingappropriate soundmeasurement equipment.

Aprimaryconcernwillbethepeakandaveragedecibel(A) levelsandthepreferred octavebanddecibellevelsfortheambientnoiseconditions.

Thedatawillbereviewedforpotential soundproblemswhichmayinterfere withoperatorcommunication requirements orwhichmaymaskauditorysignals.5-14.Maintainabilit Surve--Themaintainability surveywillassesshumanfactorssuitability ofallequipment inthecontrolroom.Primaryconcernsarethattheoperators canmaintainindicator lights,determining ifannuncia" torsystembulbsarereplaceable, replenishing expendables suchasrecorderpaperandink,anddetermining thatsparepartsandexpendables areavailable andaccessable.

V5-15.Communications Surve--Thecontrolroomcommunication systemswillbereviewedandevaluated todetermine iftheyareadequatetosupportemergency andnormaloperations.

Systemssuchasthepagingsystem,intercom6755B:1/062883 5-5 system,-telephone system,sound-powered andportableradiocommunications equipment, andfree/air, unaidedvoicecommunications willbeincludedinthisreview.Auditorysignalswillalsobeevaluated forapplications, meaning,codingtechniques, signaltransmission/propagation, andsignalcharacteristics.

5-16.Annunciator SstemsReview--Theannunciator system,asaspecialcaseoflegendlightdisplaysandauditorysignals,willbeevaluated intermsofitsgeneralhumanengineering suitability andalsoasacriticalandcentralcontrolroomsystemusedintheidentification oftransient andemergency conditions.

Datacollected willbeanalyzedfordiscrepant characteristics whichmaypotentially increasetheprobability ofhumanerror.Also,relevantdatawillbeusedtosupporttheverification andvalidation tasks.engineering suitability withoutreference tospecifictasksupportive roles.Theprimarycriteriawillbethatcontained intheCRHECReportbasedonsection6.4ofNUREG0700.fgeneralhumanengineering suitability independently ofthespecifictasksinwhichthedisplaysareused.Theprimarycriteriawillbethatcontained intheCRHECReportbasedonSection6.5ofNUREG0700.5-19.LabelsandLocationAids-Thecontrolpanelsandinstrumentation willbesurveyedforgeneralreadability andconsistency ofterms,abbrevia-tions,andacronyms.

Datafromthistaskandtheconventions surveywillfurnishthebaselineinformation usedtoestablish astandarddictionary ofterms,abbreviations, andacronymsusedthroughout thecontrolroom.5-20.ComuterSstemReview--TheP-250processcomputersystemusedinthecontrolroomwillbeassessedforitsfunctional integration intotheoperational requirements ofthecontrolroom.Itwillalsobeevaluated forgeneralhumanfactorssuitability andforitssupportive roleincontrolroomoperation.

Thecritiera.

fromtheCRHECReport,basedonNUREG0700,Section6.7(processcomputers),

formsthebasisforthis=taskplan.6755B:I/062883 5-6 5-21.Conventions Surve-Thepurposeoftheconventions surveyisthreefold.

Thoseconventions usedatD.C.Cook,whethergeneralstereotypes, industryconventions, orplant-specific conventions, willbeidentified.

Second,theidentified conventions willbeevaluated forgoodhumanfactorscharacteristics, asdefinedinthecriteriafromtheCRHECReportbasedonsection6ofNUREG0700.Finally,anyinconsistencies intheapplications ofidentified conventions willbedocumented andtheirimpactassessed.

Datafromthistaskandthelabelingandlocationaidstaskwillbeusedtodevelopranddocumentastandarddictionary ofterms,abbreviations, andacronymsfortheD.C.Cookplants.5-22.Task5-Verification ofControlRoomFunctionAsoneofthetwoterminaltasksinthereviewphase,thepresenceandsuitability ofcontrolroominstrumentation willbeverified.

Theprimaryconcernwillbedetermining thatallrequiredinformation andcontrolcapabilities areinthecontrolroom.Asacorollary, thepresenceofnonessential information andcontrolinstrumentation willbeassessedtoensurethatitdoesnotdetractfromadequateoperatorperformance.

DatafromtheControlRoomInventory andthesystemsfunctionandtaskanalysisareextensively usedintheseactivities.

5-23.Task6--Validation ofControl.RoomFunctions Throughaprocessofwalkthroughs andtalkthroughs selectedemergency andnormaloperations willbevalidated fortheavailability ofrequiredskillsandknowledge ofthetrainedoperators.

5-24.PRODUCTSOFTHEREVIEWPHASETheprimaryoutputoftheReviewPhaseisasetofchecklist observation (CLO)forms.Eachdeparture fromestablished humanfactorscriteriaobservedduringtheReviewPhasewillbedocumented

~EachCLOformwillstatetheproblem,affectedcomponents, criteriaviolated, probableerror,andotherrelevantdatarequiredforanalysisoftheproblem.67558:I/062883 5-7 TheCLOswi11providetheprimaryinputtotheAssessment Phase,whereeachwillbecategorized according tosafetyand/oroperational impact.Inaddi-tion,atthecompletion oftheReviewPhase,component sheetfileswi11becomplete, andTaskSummaryReportsforeachtaskwillhavebeenprepared.

6755B:1/062883 5-8 SECTION6DESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-A,ASSESSMENT 6-1.INTRODUCTION Thereviewprocessdescribed insection5willresultintheidentification ofdepartures fromhumanengineering criteriadefinedintheCRHECReport.Analysisandinterpretation ofthesedepartures willberequiredtoestablish theirpotential safetyimplications.

Meansofcorrecting orminimizing theeffectsofthedepartures willbeidentified anddocumented.

Aplanofactionwillbeappliedtoimprovements affecting operatorperformance underemergency andselectednormaloperating conditions.

ThePhaseIIIactivities ofassessment andimplementation arecoveredinthissectionandsection7,following.

TheAssessment PhaseoftheDCRDRProgramwi11achievethefollowing objectives:

~Analyzeandevaluatetheobserveddepartures fromhumanengineering criteriaidentified duringthereviewphase~Recommend themeansofcorrecting thosedepartures whichcouldaffectsafetyorplant/operator performance-

~Defineaplanofactionwhichappliesthehumanfactorprinciples toimprovecontrolroomdesignandtoenhanceoperatoreffectiveness andefficiency

~Applytheassessment processtootherprojectsrelatedtothecontrolroomwhichareconcerned with,ormaybeaffectedby,thehumanfactorsreview(Regulatory Guide1.97,Revision2,safetyparameters displaysystem,procedures, training) 6755B:I/0628836-1 6-2.METHODOLOGY Theassessment processinvolvesthereviewandevaluation ofallCRHECReportdepartures identified bytheDesignReviewTeamduringPhaseIItodetermine whichdepartures canaffecttheoperator's performance suchthatthepotential foroperatorerorisincreased.

Thisprocessalsoinvolvesdetermining theextentofcorrections andjustifying anyrecommendations whichdonotcompletely correctthediscrepancies.

Alldepartures fromtheCRHECReportidentified duringtheReviewPhasewillbeprocessed according totheassessment methodology presented infigure6-1.Thesedepartures willbedocumented onchecklist observation formsandwillbeprovidedtotheAssessment Teamforanalysisandassessment.

Also,someoftheoperating personnel willbecanvassed usingthephotomosaic toresolveanyfactorswhichcouldcontribute toperformance problems.

TheAssessment TeamwillreviewtheCLOstodetermine theneedforreassess-mentbytheDesignReviewTeamortheiracceptance asHEDs.Thedisposition ofeachCLOwillbejustified and/ordocumented bytheAssessment Team.TheAssessment Teamwillevaluateandcategorize eachHEDaccording tothemetho-dologypresented infigure6-2.Thisapproachaccomplishes theassessment objectives ofNUREGs0700and0801.AllcategoryI,II,andIIIHEDswillbeanalyzedforcorrection asperfigure6-3.CategoryIVHEDs,considered optionalforcorrection, willbeassessedfortheircumulative andinteractive effectsonallotherHEDs.Thosecate-goryIVHEDsshowntopossesstheaboveeffectswillberecategorized totheappropriate categoryIIlevel.'ITheinitialstepinthisprocessistoidentifythoseHEDswhichcanbecor-rectedbyenhancements, trainingofoperators, and/orprocedural revisions.

Theremaining HEDswillbeanalyzedtoidentifyandprovidedesignimprovement alternatives.

Acost/benefit analysiswillbeperformed todetermine whichcorrections arethemostfeasibleandacceptable fromahumanengineering pointofview.Asapartofthereview,IEMECo/AEPSC willperformacost/benefitassessment forimplementation oftherecommendations.

6755B:1/0628836-2 Thecontrolroomreviewprocesswillbereapplied asappropriate toensurethefollowing:

~ThatthecreationofnewHEDsisidentified

~Thatothercorrections arenotinvalidated

~Compliance withhumanengineering guidelines developed duringPhaseIITheHEDsandfinalrecommendations forcorrection providedbytheassessment teamwillbesubmitted totheProjectReviewTeamforreviewanddisposition.

RejectedCLOsand/orrecommendations willbereturnedtotheAssessment Teamforadditional assessment.

6755B:I/062883 6-3 INTERFACE/

REASSESSDESIGNREVIEWTEAM~PERFORMSTHEREVIEW~PREPARESCHECKLIST OBSERVATION FORMS-LISTOFDEPARTURES FROMPRELIMINARY CONTROLROOMHUMANENGINEERINGCRITERIAREPORTCLOASSESSMENT TEAM~REVIEWCLOS~DETERMINE SIGNIFICANCE/

IMPACTASHUMANENGINEERING DISCREPANCIES (HEDS)~INTERFACE WITHDESIGNREVIEWTEAM~CATEGORIZE HEDS(REFERTOFIGURE6-3)~FINALRECOMMENDATIONS

~DEVELOPIMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULEHEDS(W/FINALRECOMMENDATIONS)

PROJECTREVIEWTEAMREASSESS/DISAPPROVE~REVIEW/COMMENT HEDSWITHFIMALRECOMMENDATIONS~INTERFACE WITHASSESSMENT TEAM~AEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.25"ENGINEERING DESIGNCHANGES"Figure6-1.Assessment Methodology Chart6755B:1/0628836-5 DESIGNREVIEWTEAMCHECKLIST OBSERVATIONS FORMS(REASSESSMENT)

ASSESSMENT TEAMHUMANENGINEERING DISCREPANCIESEVALUATEFORSAFETYCONSEQUENCE YESNOYESHIGHPROBABILITY OFOPERATIONAL ERROR/SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION ASSESSFORSIGNIFICANTOPERATIONAL IMPACTSNONOYESCATEGORY2REFERTOFIGURE6-3CATEGORY3REFERTOFIGURE6-3NOSIGNIFICANTCOSTVERSUSOPERATORBENEFITCATEGORY1REFERTOFIGURE6-3IDENTIFYCORRECTIONSANDCOSTSTOFIXYESSELECTRECOMMENDED BACKFITQQc0oz5PeItASSESSFORNEWDEPARTURES FROMPRELIMINARY CRHECREPORTDOCUMENTANDPREPAREFORIMPLEMENTATION CATEGORY4DOCUMENTREFERTOFIGURE6-3Figuzq6-2.HumanEngineering Discrepancy Evaluation FlowChart 1I4-t'e+P)'.1 REVIEWPROCESSOBSERVATIONS HEDASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENT CRITERIACATEGORYIVASSESSMENT FACTORSAFETY(")CONSEQUENCES:

DOCUMENTED ERRORSINCREASED POTENTIAL FORERRORLOWPROBABILITY OFERRORNOTASSOCIATED WITHPROBABILITYOFERRORIMPLEMENTATION (RATING)EARLIESTOPPORTUNITY (MANDATOR Y)EARLIESTOPPORTUNITY (HIGHPRIORITY)

CONVENIENT OUTAGE(ACCEPTED)

MAYORMAYNOTBEREQUIRED(NOTMANDATORY)

HEDS(I,II,III)

(")EXAMPLE:RESULTSINUNSAFEOPERATION, VIOLATION OFTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CATIVRECOMMENDED CORRECTIONS NODOCUMENTYESANALYSISFORCORRECTION Figure6-3.HEDCategoryGuidelines 6755B:1/0628836-9

SECTION7OESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-B,IMPLEMENTATION Approvedsolutions ofHEDsbytheProjectReviewTeamwillbescheduled forimplementation.

Thecategoryguidelines established insection6willbeusedasabasisforthecorrective actionschedule.

Additional considerations inthedevelopment oftheimplementation schedulewillbe:~Safetyconsequences ofoperatorerrorsthatcouldbecausedbythediscrepancy

~Integration withotherpost-TMIprograms~Plantoperation constraints oOperatortraining/retraining requirements

~Outageschedules oEquipment procurement schedules Thefollowing designations, identifed inNUREG0801,willbeadoptedforscheduling purposes:

theNRC.Makechangesatthefirstrefueling aftersubmittal ofthereportorthefirstoutageafterreceiptofequipment (expedited).

~Nearterm.CorrectproblemsonascheduleapprovedbytheNRC.Makechangesatthesecondrefueling outageaftersubmittal ofthereport.~Lontermotional.Corrections ofinsignificant discrepancies maybeimplemented atanytime.6755B:1/0628837-1

SECTION8.OESCRIPTION OFPHASEIV,REPORTING AProgramSummaryReportwillbepreparedinaccordance withNUREGs0700and0801uponcompletion oftheOCRORProgram.Thisreportwilldocumenttheoverallreviewprocess,describeandidentifyallofthehumanengineering discrepancies andfindings, andsummarize allDCRORactivities, methodologies, andproposedcontrolroomimprovements.

Thisreportwillalsoprovideanimplementation scheduleforplannedcorrective action.Thescheduleforplannedcorrective actionshallbebasedonrealistic andachievable dates.Theuseofintermediate milestones inplaceofenddatesmaybeusedifadditional relevantinformation isnotavailable atthetimetheProgramSummaryReportis.submitted totheNRC.Intermediate milestone dateswillbedetermined baseduponthedatebywhichnecessary additional information willbeknown,thuspermitting aninformeddetermination ofenddates.TheProgramSummaryReportwillupdatetheProgramPlanningReport.TheProgramSummaryReportwillbepreparedusingtherecommended formatshowninfigure8-1.Inadditiontothisfinalreport,supporting documentation willbeavailable forcompleteness intheeventofanNRCaudit.6755B:I/062883 8-1 II CONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWSUMMARYREPORT1.0METHODOLOGY 1.1DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramPlanObjectives 1.1.1DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewmethodology 1.1.2DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewprogrammanagement 1.1.3Proposedscheduleofthefourphasesofactivity(chart)1.1.4Integration ofotheremergency responseactivities ofNUREG0737,Supplement 11.1.5Qualityassurance program1.2Management andStaffing1.2.1Qualification ofDetailedContxolRoomDesignReviewpersonnel 1.2.2Organizational structure ofDCRDRReviewTeams1.3Documentation andDocumentControl.1.4ReviewPhase1.4.11.4.21.4.31.4.41.4.51.4.6Operating experience reviewSystemfunctions reviewandtaskanalysisControlroominventory ControlroomhumanfactorssurveyVerification oftaskperformance Validation ofcontrolroomfunctions 2.0REVIEWCONCERNS2.1ControlRoomHumanFactorSurveyConcerns2.1.1Workspace Survey2.1.2Anthropometrics Survey2.1.3Emergency Equipment Survey2.1.4Heating,Ventilation, andAirCondition Survey2.1.5Illumination Survey2.1.6AmbientNoiseSurvey-Figure8-1.SampleofProgramSummaryReportFormat(Sheet1)67558:1/062883 8-3

CONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWSUMMARYREPORT(cont)2.1.72.1.82.1.92.1.102.1.112.1.12Maintainability SurveyCommunication SurveyAnnunciator SystemsReviewControlsSurveyDisplaysSurveyLabelsandLocationAids2.1.13ComputerSystemReview2.1.14Conventions Survey2.2Panel/Work StationConcerns2.3SystemConcerns2.4OtherReviewConcerns3.0ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATION ANDIMPLEMENTATION PHASE3.1HEDAssessment 3.2ProposedImplementation 3.3Scheduled Implementation

4.0CONCLUSION

Figure8-1.SampleofProgramSummaryReportFormat(Sheet2)6755B:1/062883 8-5 SECTION9COORDINATION WITHNUREG0737,SUPPLEMENT 1,ACTIYITIES Theactivities tobecoordinated withtheDCRDRinaccordance withNUREG0737,Supplement 1,includethefollowing requirements forEmergency ResponseCapabilities:

SafetyParameter DisplaySystem(SPDS)UpgradeofEmergency Operating Prodecures (EOPs)Application toEmergency ResponseFacilities

-Regulatory Guide1.97Emergency ResponseFacilities (ERFs)IEMECowilladdresstheseactivities asreferenced inI&MECo'sresponsetoNRCGenericLetter82-33forD.C.CookUnits1and2;letterPAEP-NRC-0773, datedApril15,1983.Ascheduleofperformance andintegration oftheseotherpostTMIactivities withtheDCRDRisshowninFigure9-1.6755B:1/062883 C)(TlER(X7D.C.COOKPLANT-DCRDRCOORDINATION SCHEDULE1983198'985JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND SPDSHARDWARESOFTWAREINSTALLED

$7ATv5AVAILABLE RFm'~FORTRAININGOPERATIONAL WITHOPERATORTRAININGCOMPLETEDCRDRPPRTONRCINTERMEDIATE STATUSREPORTREVIEWPHASECOMPLETEFINALSUMMARYREPORTTONRCREG.GUIDE1.97EOPEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTS SPECIFIED

,STATUSPFFAk'7INTERMEDIATE STATUSREPORTPRGCEAlRE (jEN.PACk:QQG/hl0pzmvoqncRCrg~wlN8COMPLETEREVIEWREV.2IMPLEMENTED KEYTARGETCOMMITMENT Figure9-1.ScheduleofPerformance SECTjON10QUALITYASSURANCE TheOCRORProgramwillbeperformed inaccordance withAEPSCQualityAssurance ProgramfortheOonaldC.CookNuclear'lant, specifically AEPSCGeneralProcedure 2.1andotherapplicable generalprocedures asreferenced hereinandtheapplicable portionsofWestinghouse WCAP-8370 pertaining todocumentcontrolandauditability.

6755B:1/06288310-1 SECTION11SUMMARYThisProgramPlanReportdefinestheoverallprocessbywhichtheO.C.CookUnits1and2DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramwillbeperformed.

Itisaneffective andthoroughdesignreviewwhichwillensurethattheresultsofthiseffortmeettheintentofallapplicable government regulations andguidelines.

IndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyhascommitted theresources neededtoperformthedesignreviewasdetailedinthisdocument.

Therefore, theacceptability oftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramwillbebasedontheapproval'f thisProgramPlanReport.TheIndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyCorporation reservestheright,however,tomakechangesandwillnotifytheNRCpriortotheexecution ofanyplanneddepartures.

Finalacceptance ofthisdocumentwillendthePlanningPhaseofthisprogram.6755B:1/062883 APPENDIXALISTOFABBREVIATIONS Thefollowing abbreviations applyonlytothisProgramPlanReportanddonotnecessarily applytoeffortsassociated withplantstandardabbreviations.

A/EAEPSCBOPCLOCRCRICROPSCRTDCRDRDRTEOPEPRIERGFSARHEHEDHFI8(CIKMECoINPOLELERMCBMWeMWtNRCNSSSOSDPCPMPPRArchitect/Engineer AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation BalanceofPlantChecklist Observation (form)ControlRoomControlRoomInventory ControlRoomOperating Personnel SurveyCathodeRayTubeDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewDesignReviewTeamEmergency Operating Procedures ElectricPowerResearchInstitute Emergency ResponseGuidelines FinalSafetyAnalysisReportHumanEngineering HumanEngineering Discrepancy HumanFactors-Instrumentation andControlIndianaandMichiganElectricPowerCompany(licensee)

Institute ofNuclearPowerOperators LeadEngineerLicenseeEventReportMainControlBoardMegawatt(electric)

Megawatt(thermal)

NuclearRegulatory Commission NuclearSteamSupplySystemOperational Sequences DiagramsPlantCoordinator ProgramManagerPreliminary PlanningReport6755B:1/062883 PRT-ProjectReviewTeamPSR-ProgramSummaryReportPWR-Pressurized WaterReactorSFTA-SystemsFunctionandTaskAnalysisSPDS-SafetyParameter DisplaySystemTMI-ThreeMileIslandWOG-Westinghouse Owner'sGroupCRHEC-ControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaTP-TaskPlanCRG-CanyonResearchGroupCRHFS-ControlRoomHumanFactorsSurvey6755B:I/062883A-2 APPENDIXBRESUMESOFKEYPERSONNEL 6755B:1/112983 B-l

RobertF.KroeerManagerofQualityAssurance Twentythreeyearsexperience inelectrical engineering, nuclearfuel,andqualityassurance involving majorpowergenerating anddistribution intheU.S.EDUCATION:

B.S.Electrical Engineering PurdueUniversity

-1960Additional Education:

-IndianaUniversity

-BusinessManagement 1960-62-GeneralElectricCo.PowerSystemsEngineering Course1967-1968

-AEPManagement Program-University ofMichigan-1980EXPERIENCE 1978'toPresentAmericanElectricPowerServiceCororation.ManaerofualitAssurance

-Responsibilities include:formulating andrecommending policiesandpractices withrespecttotheQAandQCprogramsforCookPlant;establishing effective QAandQCprogramsfortheCookPlant;insuringeffective implementation oftheestablished QAandQCprograms; providing guidanceandassistance toAEPSCandCookPlantmanagement onQAandQCrequirements andthenimplementation; monitoring ofcompliance withestablished QAprogramsthroughaudits,surveillance andreviews;andreporting toSeniormanagement andQAprogramseffectiveness.

Directtheday-to-day operation oftheAEPSCQADepartment including recommending thehiring,salaryadjustments, promotions, transfers, disciplining, andtermination ofpersonnel.

ContinueasSecretary oftheCCB.ElectedamemberoftheAEPSCNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee (Offsitereviewcommittee forCookPlant).1976to1978StaffEnineer,NuclearEnineerinDivision-Responsibilities includedpaiticipation innuclearfueldesignreviews,vendorevaluation, andinprocess surveillance andauditsofnuclearfuelfabrication.

Continued asSecretary oftheCCB.1973to1976StaffEnineer,ProjectManagement Division-Responsibilities includeddevelopment oftransmission anddistribution projectmanagement systemsandtechniques, methodsofmanpowerallocations, andmethodsforcostcontrol.Wasassignedtheresponsibility asSecretary oftheAEPSCChangeControlBoard(CCB)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.'Wasassignedtoa2persontaskactiongrouptodevelopcorporate projectmanagement andcontrolprocedures forananticipated, newhightemperature gascoolednuclearreactorproject.Receivedadditional specialassignments onCookPlantintheareasofcontrolofmodification, andtrackingofcommitments.

6755B:1/112983B-3 RobertF.Kroeer(Page2)1971to19731970to1971Administrative Assistant totheAEPSCViceChairman, EnineerinandConstruction

-Responsibilities werenumerousandwidelydiversified involving allfacetsofelectricutilityengineering, design,construction andoperation.

Assignedresponsibilities forcoordination ofnumerousspecialprojects,.

studiesandproblemsolvingtaskforces.Preparedresponses tooutsidecorrespondence foralllevelsofseniormanagement.

Developed andimplemented anAEPSCengineering manpowermonitoring programstocontinually monitorchangesinengineering manpowerandtechnical levelofengineering.

SeniorEnineer-Electrical EnineerinDivisionSecialAssinmenttoNuclearTaskForce-D.C.CookNuclearPlantElectrical Engineering DivisiongAprocedures, siteelectrical construction gAprocedures, electrical equipment specifications, originalcorporate wideseismicqualification specification, andelectrical equipment supplierqualification programs.

Conducted preawardauditsofandinprocess surveillance onsuppliers ofsafetyrelatedelectrical equipment.

Conducted numeroussiteauditsofelectrical construction activities.

1965to1970Enineervariousrades-Electrical EnineerinDivision-Distribution SectionNYOffice-Primaryresponsibility wasforlongrangeplanningofthedistribution systemsfortwooftheAEPsystemoperating companies, including improvement plans,loadforecasts, systemoptimization, costanalyses, coordination ofplanswithtransmission planninggroupsandpresentation ofplanstocorporate management forapproval.

Otherresponsibilities included:

administration (furtherdevelopment ofandimplementation oftheAEPsystemwidedistribution transformers loadmonitoryprogram(programtopredictonastatistical basisthemonthlyandannualpeakloadsonover400,000distribution transformers);

development andimplementation ofanAEPsystemsidedistribution systemtrouble,damageandinterruption reporting programtoprovidestatistical dataoncircuitandequipment "reliability" forplanningandequipment evaluation purposes; participated inataskforcetodevelopdistribution systemplanningguidelines; conducted numerousspecialstudiesondistribution systemequipment, construction standards andplanningcalculation techniques.

67558:1/1129838-4 1963to1965RobertF.Kroeer(Page3)Associate Enineer-CantonOhioEnineerinOivision-Primaryresponsibiljties werebasically thesameasthoseshownfor1965to1970.Th'ispositionwasestablished aspartofanefforttodevelopanAEPSCengineering groupinCanton,Ohio.Aftertwoyears,thedecisionwasmadetotransferthedistribution planningfunction,to theAEPSCNewYorkoffice.1960to1963Indiana5MichianElectricComoanAssistant Engineer-SstemEnineerinOffice,Oistribution Section-Primaryresponsibilities wereforshortrangedistribution systemplanning, development ofdetailedworkplansforimplementation ofdistribution systemimprovements, andspecialcustomerrelatedstudies.Additional responsibilities included:

evaluation ofsheetlightequipment, equipment utilization studiesandinstallation standards; continuous evaluation ofdistribution conductor connectsandassociated toolingandhardware.

67558:1/112983 8-5 RESUME:RobertC.CarruthTITLE:HeadElectrical Generation SectionAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation EDUCATION:

BachelorofEngineering 1965StevensInstitute ofTechnology MasterofEngineering

-ElectricPowerSystemsEngineering 1967Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute PRESENT:ManagerElectrical Generation SectionElectrical Engineering DivisionAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation 1979-1981 Assistant ManagerofElectrical Generation SectionElectrical Engineering DivisionAEPSC:Executeabroadrangeoftechnical andadministrative responsibilities insupervision of,anorganization of40engineers andsupporting technical personnel involvedinallaspectsofPowerPlantElectrical DesignEngineering, including powerequipment specification andapplication, auxiliary powersystemdesign,application ofprotective relayingandprotective interlocking

circuits, designofrelayandsolidstatelogiccontrolsystems,application offaultdiagnostic equipment, performance ofequipment and,system failureanalysisandthemonitoring andupgrading ofinstalled andoperating electrical equipment andsystems.Specifictechnical andadministrative responsibilities include:Conducting JobPerformance Reviews.Administrative ofthetrainingandorientation programfornewtechnical personnel.

Manpowerplanningandmanpowerallocation.

Providing independent technical reviews.Participating inNuclearStandards Development.

Participating inNuclearSafetyDesignReviewSub-Committee activities.

Conducting specialstudiesinNuclearandFossilPlantDesign,construction andoperation relatedarea.Researchorconductevaluation ofsystemsorequipment misoperations, reportable occurrences, equipment

failures, etc.Participate inNuclearPlantSiteAudits.6755B:1/112983 B-7 R.C.CarruthPage2PreviousNuclearExerience1972-1979 SeniorEngineer, andProjectElectrical EngineerforD.C.CookNuclearPlant;two1100MWWestinghouse PWR's.Responsible fortechnical andadministrative supervision ofanorganization ofsixtotenengineers andengineering supportpersonnel involvedinconstruction, qualification, licensing, pre-operational testing,startupandpostoperational engineering anddesignsupport.Specifictechnical andadministrati've responsibilities included:

Performing orsupervising hhedetaildesignofClassIEaswellasbalanceofplantelectrical systems,circuitsandcomponents.

Preparation ofEquipment qualification testprocedures.

Witnessacceptance testing.Supervise thepreparation ofplantsiteauditplans.Writeandsupervise thepreparation andexecution ofpre-operational testprocedures.

Supervise thedevelopment andtestingofClassIEcomponents.

Provideonsitestartuptechnical supportandsupervision.

DevelopanEngineering Procedures Manual.Establish procedures forengineering qualitycontrol.Institute anEngineering equalityAssurance Program.Assistintheestablishment ofaCorporate DesignChangeControlProcess.Performworkplanning; scheduling manpowerandassignments.

Personnel Performance Reviews.Supervise andprovidetechnical liaisontoaconsultant organization contracted tosupplement thepermanent staffassignedtotheProjectElectrical organization.

6755B:1/112983B-8 R.C.CarruthPage3GeneralIndustrExerience1977-1979 SeniorEngineerandSupervisory Engineerfortheelectrical designofRacineHydroelectric Project.Responsible forconceptual aswellasdetailengineering oftheelectrical systems,protectives, plantcontrols, dispatchautomation andsupervisory anddiagnostic systemsforremoteunattended operations Specificareasofactivityincluded:

Generation ofElectrical OneLines.Specification purchaseandapplication ofmajorelectrical systemsandhardwareincluding:

600Vand6.9kVswitchgear.

6.9kVIsolatedandNonSeg.Phasebus.Programmable controllers forcontrolanddispatchfunctions.

Equipment statusandalarmmonitoring system.Remotesupervisory anddataacquisition system.Batterycharger,inverterandUPSsystem.Parameter monitoring anddatamanagement system.Designof'lantcontrolsandprotective interlockingcircuitsandlogic.Development ofdispatchalgorithims foreconomicdispatchofthefacility.

Application ofgenerator andauxiliary powersystemprotective relaying.

Integration ofplantcontrolsandoperation withsubtransmission systemrelayingandswitching requirements.

Application ofstationoscillograph andplantsystemsstatusdiagnostic computerandannunciator systems.Application ofon-siteemergency dieselgeneration, andthedesignofautomatic loadshedding, restoration, re-transfer andtestingcircuitry.

6755B:1/112983B-9 R.C.CarruthPage41969-1972 EngineerandSponsor(ProjectElectrical)

Engineerfor.MitchellPlant-two800MWcoalfiredsuper-critical units:Responsible forelectrical controlandprotection, auxiliary powersystemsprotective

relaying, relatedoperatortrainingandrelatedstartupandcommissioning supervision.

Specificresponsibilities andactivities included:

Designofelectrical controlandpowercircuits.

Application andsettingofprotective relays.Application ofswitchgear andotherswitching andprotective devices.Designofrelayanddigitalsolidstatelogicforplantcoalhandlingautomation.

Designofrelaycontrollogicandinterlocking forplantsystems.Preparation ofoperatorreference systemdescriptions andoperating instructions.

Prepareanddeliveroperatortrainingandorientation lecturesonkeyplantsystems.Writetestandcommissioning instructions.

Provideon-sitetechnical supporttoconstruction andrelaycheckoutpersonnel.

1968-1972 EngineerandProjectElectrical Engineerforthedesignandinstallation ofa345MVARsynchronous condenser installation aspartofa765kVEHVsystemexpansion.

Responsibilities included:

Designofallcontrolsandprotectives.

Designofauxiliary powersystem.Ratingmajorelectrical components.

Specification andpurchaseofcontrolcomponents, switchgear, transferswitches, auxiliary powerequipment, motorcontrolcenters,transformers.

Reviewandapprovalofallvendorsuppliedsystems,including excitation, generator coolingwatertreatment anddemineralizer systemequipment, andallstartingsystemequipment including generator startingandrunningbusswitching equipment.

6755B:1/112983B-10 R.C.CarruthPage51967"1969 Associate

Engineer, Assisting ProjectElectrical Engineerinvariousaspectsofastripmineexpansion project,automated coalhaulage(railroad),

overlandconveyors, coalprocessing stationsandmisc.coalhandlingsystems.67558:1/112983 8"11

KARLJ.TOTHEDUCATION University ofSouthernCaliformia, M.A.,SystemManagement, 1968University ofOmaha,B.S.,MilitaryScience,1962CentralMichiganCollegeofEducation, 1950REGISTRATION Professional

Engineer, StateofCalifornia EXPERIENCE AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation, 1983-PresentNUSCorpodation, 1980-1983U.S.AirForce,1951-1980MichiganSchoolSystem,1950-1951AMERICANELECTRICPOWERSERVICECORPORATION

-AssignedtotheNuclearSafetyandLicensing Sectionwithresponsibility forsafetyimplications ofallproposedD.C.CookNuclearPlantmodifications.

Reviewsallproposedchangesfor10CFR50.59 requirements andD.C.Cooklicensing commitments totheNRC.NUS-Asaconsulting engineerwiththeConsequence Assessment Department, isresponsible fortheanalysisofprobabilities andconsequences ofindustrial andtransportation accidents.

Conducted aircraftimpacthazardanalysisfortheSanOnofre,Skagit/Hanford, andHopeCreeknuclearpowerplantsandwroteSection3.5.1.6ofthepreliminary andfinalsafetyanalysisreports(PSARandFSAR)fortheHopeCreekplant.Performed analysisofprobabilities foraccidents

injuries, anddeathsfortheenvironmental impactstatement foraway-from-reactor fuelreceiving andstoragestationsatNuclearFuelServices, WestValley,NewYork;GeneralElectric, Morris,Illinois, andAlliedGeneralNuclearServices,

Barnwell, SouthCarolina.

Conducted riskanalyses, including possibleaccidents scenarios, onmilitarydeployment anduseofkrypton-85 advancedairfieldlightingsystems.Performed excavatioon planningandtimeestimates fortheGinnaNuclearPowerPlant.Conducted accidentandriskanalysesofremotelypilotedvehiclesfortheU.S.Department ofEnergy.Theseanalysesincludedpossibleaccidentscenarios, failuremodes,andprobabilities.

Inaddition, performed fieldsurveys,collected data,andmanagedprojectsforbothoffiteandonsitehazardsanalysisforcontrolroomhabitability forUnits1and2oftheSurry,Skagit/Hanford, andMidlandNuclearPowerPlants.Thisworkresultedinwritingrevisions toSection2.2oftheMidlandFSAR,which,includedanextensive studyandreport,andwritingSectionZ.ZoftheSkagit/Hanford PSARandtheHopeCreekFSAR~Participated intheIDCORAtomicIndustrial ForumonNuclearPowerPlantControlRoomOperatorHumanFactorsStudy.6755B:1/112983B-13 KARLJ.TOTHPage2U.S.AIRFORCE-Servedaspilotandinprogressive management positions inboththeoperations andsafetyfunctions.

Attermination ofAirForcecareer,wasChiefofSafetyforAirForceSystemsCommand,withresponsibility forsystemsafety,reliability, maintainability, andoverallproductassurance forapproximately 90percentofthehardwareandsoftwarepurchased bytheU.S.AirForce.From1974through1977,wasresponsible forreviewing andapproving evacuation plansandcontrolcenteroperations for20installations intheeasternUnitedStates.Hashadextensive experience workingwithanddirecting postaccidents radiation-monitoring teams,decontamination teams,andaccidentinvestigations.

AsChiefofSafetyandDisasterControl,from1962to1974,conducted evacuation studiesatsixnuclearinstallations; oneinJapan,twoinEurope,andthreeintheUnitedStates.Studiesincludedtimeestimates, routes,methods,andprocedures fordispersing personnel andcriticaldefenseequipment.

Responsibilities alsoincludedestablishing anddirecting emergency controlcenterprocedures andoperations ateachlocation.

Investigated acatastrophic bomberaircraftcrashinJapanwhichresultedinmanyunnecessary civiliancasualties.

Theselosseswereattributed toalackofknowledge bythelocalpopulation.

Asaresult,developed, andtranslated, anddistributed emergency procedures checklists forlocalofficials.

Alsowroteanexplanation ofthehazardsandrisksandestablished simpleprocedures tobefollowedintheeventoffutureaccidents.

Theseprocedures weretranslated andpublished inlocalpapersandbroadcast periodically onlocalradioandtelevision.

Thesechecklists andnewsmediareleaseswerewellreceivedandsubsequently translated andsuccessfully usedatlocations inEuropeandintheUnitedStates.MEMBERSHIPS AmericanDefensePreparedness Association AmericanNuclearSocietyCertified HazardControlManagerInternational SocietyofAirSafetyInvestigators NationalAerospace Education Association NationalSocietyofProfessional Engineers SystemSafetySociety6755B:1/1129838-14 ARTHURS.GRZMESConsultin Mechanical EnineerThirtyfiveyearsexperience inmechanical engineering activities involving majorpowergenerating facilities intheUnitedStatesandZsrael.EDUCATZON:

Pzofessional degreeinMechanical Engineering University ofCincinnati, 1948Additional Education:

BusinessAdministration, AdelphiUniversity 1955Automatic Control,University ofMichigan1954EXPERZENCE:

1978toPresentAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorConsulting Mechanical Engineer-Consultant tomechanical engineering andotherdisciplines inareasofautomatic control,plantoperation andthermalperformance.

Performnuclearplantaudits.Consultonresearchprojects.

1972-77Assistant DivisionManager-Mechanical Engineering Responsible formechanical engineering activities inplantmodification andoperation ofanuclearpowerplant.1955-72Manager,ResultsSection-Responsible fordesignandpurchaseofinstrumentation andcontrolsystems,steamcycleanalysis, andpezformancetestingofpowergenerating plants.Plantsincludedcoal,oil,nuclearandhydro.1950-551948-49Engineer-Responsible fordesignandpurchaseofinstrumentation andcontrolsystemsforfossilpowerplants.AalachianPowerCo.,Loan,WestViriniaResultsEngineerresponsible formaintenance ofinstruments andcontrolsandforperformance testingincoalfiredpowerplant.PROFESSZONAL AFFZLZATZON:

Fellow,AmericanSocietyofMechanical Engineers Chapter8,PumpHandbook-McGraw-Hill 1976Operating Experience WithTheCardinalPlantTrainingSimulator

-AmericanNuclearSociety1970ServiceExperience WithAnalogComputers ForUtilityPowerPlants-AmericanPowerConf.1962 CMeasurement ofDensityandMoistureinaLargeCoalStoragePile-AmericanPowerConf.1961Application ofanAutomatic DigitalDataCollecting SystemToThePhiloSupercritical Unit,AmericanPowerConf.1958ThermalPerformance OfThePhiloSupercritical Unit-AmericanSocietyofMechanical Engineers, 1958PATENTS:4,343,682 Feedwater HeatingMeansforNuclearUnitsDuringStart-upandMethodofControlling Same.3,721,898, Apparatus forDetecting LeakageFromorRuptureofPipesandOtherVesselsContaining FluidUnderPressure.

3,211,135 SteamGenerator UnitContxolSystem SummaryResumeofTHOMASB.SHERIDANThomasB.SheridanattendedPurdueUniversity (B.S.1951)and,aftertwoyearsinmilitaryservice(Aeromedical Laboratory, WrightPatterson AirForceBase,Ohio)attendedtheUniversity ofCalifornia, LosAngeles(M.S.1954)andM.I.T.(Sc.D.1959).Hisdoctoralprogramwasinterdepartmental between'systemsengineering andpsychology, withoneyearspentincross-registration atHarvardUniversity.

Formostofhiscareer,Or.SheridanhasremainedatM.I.T.,whereuntilrecentlyhewasProfessor ofMechanical Engineering andisnowProfessor ofEngineering andAppliedPsychology.

HeheadstheMan-Machine'Systems Laboratory andteachesbothgraduateandundergraduate subjectsinMan-Machine Systems.HeisaFacultyAssociate oftheM.I.T.Science,Technology andSocietyProgram.Hehelpeddevelopanewinterdepartmental graduatedegreeprograminTechnology andPolicy,and.hastaughtthecoreseminarsforthatprogram.Hehasalsotaughtcontrol,designandotherengineering subjects.

HehasservedasvisitingfacultymemberattheUniversity ofCalifornia,

Berkeley, StanfordUniversity, andtheTechnical University ofDelft,Netherlands.

NDr.Sheridan's researchhasbeenonmathematical modelsofhumanoperatorandsocio"economic systems,onman-computer interaction inpilotingaircraftandinsupervising underseaandindustrial roboticsystems,andoncomputergraphictechnology forinformation searching andgroupdeicision-making.

Heisauthor,withW.R.Ferrell,ofMan-Machine Sstems:Information, ControlandDecisionModelsofHumanPerformance, M.I.T.Press,1974,1981(published inRussian,1980)andco-editor ofa1976PlenumPressbook,M~onitorin BehaviorandSuervisorControl.HeisafellowoftheInstitute ofElectrical andElectronics Engineers, wasformerlyeditoroftheIEEETransactions onMan-Machine Sstems,ispastpresident ofthe'EEESystems,ManandCybernetics Society,servedasChairmanoftheIEEECommittee onTechnology Forecasting andAssessment andwaschairmanofthe1981IEEEWorkshoponHumanFactorsinNuclearSafety.HeisalsoaFellowoftheHumanFactorsSociety,andin1977receivedthe'irPaulM.FittsAwardforcontributions toeducation.

HeisAssociate EditorofAutomatica andontheEditorial AdvisoryBoardofComuterAidedDesin.Dr.SheridanhasservedontheAccidentPrevention andInjuryControlStudySectionsoftheNationalInstitutes ofHealth,theNASALifeSciencesAdvisoryCommittee, theNSFAutomation ResearchCouncil,theNASAStudygrouponRobotics, theU.S.CongressOTATaskForceonAppropriate Technology, andtheNSFAdvisoryCommittee onAppliedPhysical, Mathematical andBiological FactorsandservedontheNRCAdHocCommittee onAircrew-Vehicle Interaction andtwoadvisorypanelsoftheNRCMarineBoard.Hisindustrial consulting activities haveincluded:

TheGeneralMotorsCorp.(autosafety);GeneralElectricCo.(telemanipulator s);C.S.DraperLaboratory 6755B:1/112983B-17 ThomasB.SheridanPage2(designofastronaut interface forApolloguidancesystem,industrial robots);Biodynamics, Inc.(biomedical andhumanfactors);

PublicBroadcast Service(TVaudiencefeedback);

NationalBureauofStandards (industrial robots);GroupDialogSystems,Inc.(groupmeetinganddecisiontechnology);

NorthropAircarft(pilotworkload);

BabcockandWilcoxCo.(industrial instrumenta-tions);Lockheed, GeneralPhysics,AmericanElectricPower,Consumer's andWebster,theBWROwners'roup, Brookhaven NationalLaboratory, YankeeAtomic,andElectricPowerResearchInstitute.(man-machine aspectsofnuclearplantsafety).67558:1/112983 8-18 Manaer,Instrumentation andControlSectionSeventeen yearsexperience ininstrumentation, controlandequipment protection activities involving majorpowergenerating anddistribution facilities intheUnitedStates..EDUCATION:

B.S.Electrical Engineering, IllinoisInstitute ofTechnology, 1966REGISTRATION:

EXPERiENCE:

1977toPresent1976to1977Additional Education:

AEPManagement Course-University ofMichigan, 1979Professional Engineer-California (1977)AmericanElectricPowerServiceCororationManager,Instrumentation

&ControlSection-Responsibilities includesupervising thedevelopment oftheoverallplantcontrolphilosophy.

Review,approveandrecommendations ofinstruments, controls&computersuppliedwithallmajormechanical equipment.

Organizethedevelopment ofsoftware, selection ofhardwareforpowerplantprocesscomputers.

Supervise thearrangement ofcontrolrooms,simulators andpanelsincorporating humanfactorconsiderations.

Assuredocumentation ofinstru-mentation, controlandcomputerstrategies viatheEngineering ControlProcedure (ECP)packages.

Carryouttheinterface betweenMechanical andElectrical Engineering forControlDesignandEngineering.

Provideforprofes-sionaldevelopment andtrainingofSectionpersonnel.

Recommend hiring,salaryadjustments, promotion, transfers andreleaseofpersonnel.

ProjectworkincludesMontaineer Unit1andRockportUnits1&21300mwfossilfiredpowerplants,CookNuclearPlantUnits1&2upgrades, thePressurized Fluidized BedCombustion ProjectStudies,andanewseriesofFossilFiredPlantstudiesin-plantmonitoring computers forStackEnvironmental Data.Assistant SectionHead/Instrumentation

&ControlSection-Responsibilities includedsupervision, instrument andcontrolwork,training, evaluating personnel performance, reviewandapprovalofpurchaseorders,standards anddrawings, supervise thearrangement anddesignofcontrolpanels,supervise anddesignofcontrolsystems,coordinate thepreparation ofboiler&turbineinterlock diagramsandanalyzing thepowerplantcycleandtheircontrols.

Projectworkincludedaseriesof1300MMFossilFiredPowerPlants,D.C'.CookNuclearPlantUnit1&2andaMechanical Engineering DivisionPowerPlantCycleStudy.67558:1/112983 8-19 JohnC.JeffreyPage21975to1976Engineer, Instrumentation

&ControlSection,N.Y.Office-"Responsibilities includeddesignofcontrolsystems,selection ofinstruments andcontroldevices,preparation ofspecifications, reviewofconstruction

drawings, inspection ofnewfacilities, preparecalibrated andoperation instructions andmakedynamicresponsestudies.ProjectworkincludedtheCookPlantWasteEvaporator andWasteEvaporator BottomsSystems,RequestForChangeSheet,LotandUnitP2replacement equipment.

1974to19751972to1974Engineer, Instrumentation

&ControlSectionatCookPlant-Responsibilities includedsupervision oftheNERVEorganization asoutlinedbelowplusassisting theCookPlantwithstaffprocedures, audits,testsandtraining.

Indiana&MichianElectricComtianSupervising

Engineer, GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atCookPlant-Responsibilities includedsupervision,

engineer, design,construction, maintenance andoperation ofstation&plantfacilities, supervise installation

&maintenance andofstationandplantequipment, formulate policiesandprocedures, supervise specialstudiesandreports,assistinplanningandengineering newstations, supervise repairing equipment inconnection withfailure.Responsible foremployment, promotion,

transfer, discipline anddischarge.

Projectsincludedallelectrical controlsandD.C.CookNuclearPlant.1971to1972SeniorEngineer, GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atCookPlant-Responsibilities includedperforming anddirecting othersintesting,adjusting stationandplantequipment, reviewing construction printstoassurethattheyareconsistent withintendedfunction, inspect&coordinate theworkofcontractors, makerecommendations tocorrectmalfunctions, planandperformspecialtests,analyzetestresults,prepareestimates, reportsandstudies.Projectsincludedallelectrical controlsatD.C.CookNuclearPlant.1970to1971SeniorEngineer.,

GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atNewYorkOffice-Responsibilities includedparticipating inthedesignandengineering ofD.C.CookNuclearPlant.Projectsincludeddieselloadanalysis, safeguard pumpcontrol,essential servicewater,sewagedisposal, auxiliary feedwater,controlair,black"out sequencing, component coolingwaterthe345/765stationandthe69/4KVemergency powerstation.6755B:1/112983 8;20 JohnC.JeffreyPage31969to19701969to1969Engineer, GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atMichiganPowerCompany-Responsibilities includedMaintenance andPerformance TestsofStationandHydroequipment suchascircuitbreakers, transformers, relaysandprotective equipment.

Iwasresponsible forinspection ofstationconstruction projectsandcoordinating contractor's workandtraining.

Projectsincludedtwo69KVtransmission anddistribution stationandConstatine and'Mottville Hydroelectricplants.Engineer, GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atBigSandyPlant-Responsibilities includedperforming testsofPlantEquipment suchascircuitbreakers, heaters,transformers, pumps,valves,relays,protective equipment andtraining.

Projectsincludecirculating water,coolingtowers,trans-formers,pulverizers, generator, unitcircuitbreakersandthe765KVstationequipment.

1968to1969Engineer,

'GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atMichiganPowerCompany-Responsibilities includedmaintaining andperforming testsofstationequipment, suchascircuitbreakers, transformers, relaysandprotective equipment.

Iwasresponsible forinspection ofstationconstruction projectsandcoordinating contractors work,design,economicjustification ofnewstationcontrolandtraining.

Projectsincludedinspection, testing,repairandpartialredesignofControlatallMichiganPowerTransmission Stations.

Thecontroldesign&economicjustification, testing,calibration andplacinginserviceofa69/34KVtransmission stationSchoolCraftSouth.1966to1968Engineer, GeneralOffice,.StationDepartment atIndianaandMichiganElectricCo.-Responsibilities includedrunningspecialequipment test,performing testingofstationequipment suchascircuitbreakers, transformers, relaysandprotective equipment, carriercurrentandsupervisory control.Iwasresponsible forinspecton ofstationconstruction projectsandcoordinating contractor's workfortrainingandtrainingequipment, forcalibration andtimingstudies,calibration recordsystemandcalibration aids.Projectsincludedtestingofsolidstaterelays,testingshockpreventative devices,designandconstruction ofatrainingsimulator, development ofacalibration record,calibration charts,stationcalculations, timingcoordination studies,installation of345KVcircuitbreakersatTannersCreekPlant.Stationremovalandinstallation of345KVcircuitbreakersatBreekPlantStation.6755B:1/112983B-21

'\/A0 RexfordF.Shoemaker SeniorEnineer,Instrumentation

&ControlSectionTwenty-one yearsexperience ininstrumentation, controlandprotective systemsactivities infossilfuelpowergeneration stations.

EDUCATION:

B.S.Mechanical Engineering WestVirginiaInstitute ofTechnology, 1961EXPERIENCE:

1972to1983Apalachian PowerComanPlantPerformance Superintendent, JohnE.AmosPlant-Responsibilities includedallplantinstrumentation, controlandprotective systems,cyclechemistry andcontrol,environmental controlsandthermalperformance andtesting.Supervise eighty(80)technical andsupervisory personnel.

Wrotefirst1300MWIntegrated UnitControlSystemlineupandcalibration procedure.

Alternate weekendcall-outdutieswithOperation Department Superintendent, supervise unitstart-ups andoperations Wrotefirst1300MWunitnormalcoldstart-upprocedure.

1970to1972Performance Supervising Engineer"Responsibilities includedsupervising technicians andengineers incheck-out, calibration andstart-upactivities ofAmosplantinstrumentation andcontrolssystemsontwo800MWandone1300MWcoalfiredsupercritical pressureunits.1969to1970Performance EngineerSenior,ontemporary assignment toAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation, Instrumentation 6ControlSectioninNewYorkCity-Responsibilities includedhelpingtoassemblecalibration booksforAmosUnits1and2.Reviseasrequiredforautomatic controlBigSandyUnit2Integrated UnitControlSystem.Developfirst800MWIntegrated UnitControlSystemcalibration andlineupdrawings.

HelpwithMitchellUnitOneWestinghouse-Hagan factorycheckoutofIntegrated UnitControlSystemCabinets.

1968to1969Performance

Engineer, KanawhaRiverPlant-Responsibilities includedsupervising instrument andcontroltechnician crew.6755B:1/112983 B-23 RexfordF.Shoemaker Page21966to19671961to1966BaileMeterComanSystemsEngineer, Wickliffe, Ohio-Responsibilities includeddes'ign,specify,documentstandardcontrolsystemlogicforcentralstationapplications.

Troubleshootlargeelectronic controlsystemsonsupercritical unitsandreviseasnecessary tohelpdevelopcompanystandards.

Helpdesign,assemble, check-out andputintoservicefirstclosedloopanalogsimulator forfactorycheckoutoflargeelec'tronic controlsystemsforsupercritical units.FieldServiceEngineer, Cincinnati, Ohio-Responsibilities includedserviceandmaintainexistingcontrolsystemspluscheckoutandstart-upnewcontrolsystemsrangingfromsmallpneumatic onindustrial drumboilersandprocesses tolargeelectronic oncentralstationunits.6755B:1/1129838"24 FrankS.VanPelt,Jr.Professional Engineer-MichiganSectionManager-Construction ProjectManagement IIIAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorp.BachelorofScience-Mechanical Engineering VirginiaPolytechnic Institute andStateUniversity June,1982-Present-AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorp.SectionManagerforCookPlantProjectManagement IIIPlanningandScheduling RFCworkforCookPlant.March,1980-May,1982-AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorpSectionManager-PlanningandScheduling; ProjectControls.

Coordinated CookPlantFSARUpdate;begandevelopment ofdetaillogicnetworksforCoalFiredPowerPlantConstruction program.HeadedoneofthreeteamsduringStudyprogramfornewcoalfiredpowerplant.July,1979-'ebruary, 1980-AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorp.ProjectControl-Engineer-Construction Projects.

Beganthedevelopment ofcomputerprogramforscheduling theengineering, designandconstruction ofacoalfiredpowerplant.April,1978-June,1979-AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorp.ProjectManagerassignedtoHeliumBreederAssociates, SanDiego,California.

Assistedinthedevelopment oftheManagement SystemandprogramtobeusedfortheGasCooledFastBreederReactorProgram.May,1977-March,1978-I&MElectricCo.-D.C.CookPlantLeadStart-upEngineerDirectedsixStart-UpEngineers inthecompletion andstart-upofUnit2'ntCookPlant.Maintained thePreopscheduleandassuredtimelyreleaseofsystemsforPreopTesting..

August,1972-April,1977-I&MElectricCo.-D.C.CookPlantStart-UpEngineer/Assistant LeadStart-upEngineerCoordinated thecompletion andstart-upofassignedsystemsforbothUnit1and2.Preparedsysteminitialoperating procedures, flushingprocedures andhydrostatic testprocedures.

6755B:1/112983B-25 FrankS.VanPelt,Jr.Page2June,1970-July,1972-CentralOperating Co.-PhilipSpornPlantPerformance EngineerPlanned,set-upequipment, tookdata,calculated andanalyzedtheresultsandmaderecommendations forequipment performance improvements formyassignedunits.67558:1/112983 8-26 JamesB.BrittanSeniorEnineer,ualitAssurance Morethantwentyyearsexperience invariousgualityAssurance andReliability activities including sevenyearswithnuclearpowergeneration facilities.

EDUCATION:

B.S.inMarineEngineering, NYStateMaritime1954GraduateStudiesinNuclearEngineering, UCLAMBA,CWPost,'Div.

LIU.EXPERIENCE:

1977toAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation Responsible forestablishment andimplementation ofcompletesupplierqualification programforallcompanies furnishing equipmeat orservicesimportant tonuclearsafetytoAEP(morethanfourhundreddiverseorganizations).

Responsible forauditortrainingandcertification program.Responsible forplanning, scheduling andimplementation ofinternalgualityAssurance auditprogram.ProjectgArepresentative onspentfuelrackmodification andPlantsecuritysystemprojects.

1962-1976 LundElectronics 8Sstem,Inc.gualityAssurance Manager,responsible forqualityplanning, reliability, qualityplanning, qualityengineerng, qualitycontrolandalltestingassociated withthecompany's diverselineofelectromechanical products.

Directedenvironmental lab,modelshop,electronic lab,andmetrology functions.

Managedbudgets,testprogramcontracts, otherplanning8scheduling functions.

Wroteproposals, testplansandreports.6755B:I/112983B-27 LouisP.DeMarcoEXPERIENCE:

6/73-PresentEngineering Assistant Electrical Generation SectionElectrical Engineering DivisionRESPONSIBILITIES:

4/79-PresentResponsible forSystemEngineering functions suchas:Evaluating andimplementing allphasesofdesignmodifications fortwo1100MWnuclearunits,including Radiation Monitoring System,ReactorProtection System,HydrogenMitigation Distributed IgnitionSystem,FireProtection Systems,variousplantsystemsandtheirsupport.Provideplantstaffwithelectrical engipeering support.Investigate andprepareresponses inconnection withNuclearRegulatory Commission circulars andbulletins.

Coordinate Plant'Annunciator ResponseProcedure Review.TaskforcememberforOnsiteLowLevelRadiation WasteStorageFacility.

3/76-4/79(}ualityControlEngineerresponsible formanagingandimplementing thequalitycontrolsystemfornuclearplantengineering designmodifications, including reviewofallelectrical engineering des'ignmodifications fortechnical andprocedural completeness.

6/73-3/76Technical Assistant, assisting bothfossilandnuclearengineering staffby:performing engineering calculations, datatabulations, equipment specifications, purchaseandexpediting.

EDUCATION:

Polytechnic Institute ofNewYork110creditscompleted towardB.S.E.E.StatenIslandCommunity CollegeA.S.S.Degree-1973Electro-Mechanical Technology 6755B:1/1129838-29 ftJ ThaddeusRussellStephensCitizenshi U.S.(Born-Niles,Michigan)

PositionTitleSeniorPerformance EngineerPresentEmloerIndianaandMichiganElectricCo'mpanyDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantEducation November1980:AttendedCombustion Engineering's two-weekSimulator TrainingProgramandcompleted thereactorstartupexamination satisfactorily.

April1980:University ofMichigan, AnnArbor,Michigan.

Successfully completed thetwo-weekReactorOperatorTrainingProgramatFordNuclearReactor/Phoenix MemorialLaboratory.

March1978:Asixteen-hour courseonvibration analysisgivenbytheIRDCompany.(June-August1976:AmericanElectricPower'sPerformance Improvement Programconsisted of240hoursofbothclassroom lecturesonpowerplantrelatedsubjectsandperformance testingof1300megawattcoalfiredunitwithrelatedequipment andcalculations oftestdata.March1975:Aforty-hour recorderandcontrolsmaintenance coursegivenbytheLeeds8NorthrupCompany.1974:Graduated, Tri-State College,Angola,Indiana,BachelorofScienceinMechanical Engineering.

Attendeda40-hourManagement TrainingCoursegivenbytheIndiana4MichiganElectricCompany.6755B:1/112983B-31 T.R.StephensPage2Setember1979toPresent:SeniorPerformance EngineerassignedtotheOperations Department attheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.DutiesincludethereviewandrevisionoftheOperations Department Procedures andgeneraltechnical supportfortheDepartment.

Auust1976toSeptember 1979:SeniorPerformance EngineeratTannersCreek,havingthedutiestosupervise thePerformance Engineers whohaveunitresponsibility, toscheduletestworkandassignandmonitorprojectwork.November1974toAuust1976:WorkedasaPerformance Engineerina1050megawattgenerating stationwhichhasfourcoal-fi,red units.ThestationistheTannerysCreekStationownedbytheIndiana5MichiganElectricCompany,asubsidiary ofAmericanElectricPowerCompany.Mydutiesincludedtestingofmajorunitequipment, assortedprojectwork,andthemaintaining oftheunit'scontrolsystems.March1974toNovember1974:Workedasafirstlinesupervisor ofaforgelineandweldinglineinthemanufacture ofsinglepieceaxlehousingsintheHousingDivisionofClarkEquipment Company.Lefttogetworkmoreinlinewithmyprofessional training.

June1968toMarch1974:Co-opstudentwithClarkEquipment CompanyinBuchanan, Michigan.

6755B:1/112983B-32 JOHND.YOUNG-SeniorEngineer, Electrical PowerSystems/Control BoardDesign,Westinghouse ElectricCorporation Education:

-B.S.inElectrical Engineering fromTri-State College~EMr.YoungiswithWestinghouse ElectricCorporation intheInstrumentation andControlDepartment, Electrical PowerSystemsandControlBoardDesigngroup.Hisworkexperience forthepasttenyearshasbeenintheareaofmaincont'rolandpanellayout.design.HeistheleadengineerfortheControlBoardDesigngroup.Mr.Youngwastheresponsible designengineerforthecontrolboardsforthefollowing nuclearpowerplants:a)SequoyahUnits1and2b)WattsBarUnits1and2c)KrskoUnit1(Yugoslavia) d)NapotPointUnit1(Philippines)

Hewasalsotheresponsible engineerinthedesignofamodularoperation consolewhichcanintegrate therequirements ofReg.Guide1.97andNUREG0696intoexistingcontrolrooms.Mr.Youngalsohasoverthreeyearsexperience withthereactorprotection andsafeguards systemspanels.Hewasinstrumental inthedesignofthesafeguards on-linetestingsysem.Mr.Young'sexperience inthenuclearindustryspansfourteenandone-halfyearswithWestinghouse intheInstrumentation andControlfield.6755B:1/112983B"33 WAYNER.YOUNG-Engineer, Electrical PowerSystemsandControlBoardDesignEducation:

-A.S.inElectronics Technology fromtheCommunity CollegeofAllegheny County-Continuing towardsaB.S.inElectrical Engineering fromtheUniversity ofPittsburgh Exerience:Mr.YoungiswiththeWestinghouse ElectricCorporation intheInstrumentation andControlDepartment, Electrical PowerSystemsandControlBoardDesignGroup.Hisworkexperience hasbeenintheareaofmaincontrolboard/panel layoutanddesign.Histotalnuclearexperience spansnineyearsofservicewithWestinghouse intheinstrumentation andcontrolfield.Heisthecognizant engineerforthehumanengineering evaluation fortheLouisiana PowerandLightWaterford 3nuclearplant,aprogramwhichincludedthefollowing.

a)Assessthelayoutandadequacyofthemaincontrolboard(MCB)requiredtosupportoperating crewactivities throughtheuseofplant-specific Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs).b)VerifythattheEOPsequenceofstepsandprocedural flowarecompatible withtheMCBlayout.c)ConductEOPverification walk-throughs intheWaterford 3controlroom.d)=Providerecommendations forresolution ofHumanEngineering Discrepancies (HEDs).e)Assistinthedevelopment ofplantspecific, symptom-based, eventscenarios foruseintheEOPverification.

6755B:1/062883B-35 WAYNER.YOUNG(continued) f)Assistinthepreparation oftheeventrecognition report,MCRdisplaymaps,taskmaps,andlinkanalysisdocumentation.

Mr.Youngisalsoresponsible forthemaincontrolboardequipment qualification program.Dutiesforequipment qualified toIEE323"1974and344-1975include:a)Participation inthepreparation ofequipment qualification reports.b)Generation andmaintenance ofbaselinedesigndocuments.

c)Generation andmaintenance ofcomputerized specifications.

d)Equipment quotations.

e)Equipment procurement.

f)Maintenance ofqualification filsforauditability.Additionally, Mr.YoungisthesystemsengineerfortheNuclearSteamSupplySystem(NSSS)onthefollowing powerplants:a)ComanchePeakUnits¹1and¹2b)McGuireUnits¹1and¹2c)CatawbaUnits¹1and¹2d)MannshanUnits¹1and¹2e)KoreaUnit¹2f)Millstone Unit¹2g)VirgilC.Summerh)BeaverValleyUnit¹2Activities includereviewandapprovalofarchitect/engineer documentation, designoftheroddropdisconnect switchbox,equipment procurement, schedul-ing,anddocumentation transmittal.

6755B:1/062883~B-36 ROBERTJ.WARTENBERG

-Instruction Coordinator andInstructor, Instrumentation Technology TrainingCenter,Westinghouse ElectricCorporation Education:

-Community CollegeofAllegheny Country,12credithoursinEducation

-SouthernIllinoisUniversity, 69credithoursinEducation

-Militaryschools:Electronic Technician "A"School,BasicNuclearPowerSchool,andNuclearPowerPrototype Exerience:Mr.Wartenberg hasover8yearsofexperience inthenavalandcommercial nuclearfields,withemphasisonplantoperations andtraining, andsupervisory experience inallaspectsofcoursepresentation, personnel

training, andprogramadministration anddevelopment.

Mr.Wartenberg assistsinhumanfactorsevaluations ofcontrolroomdesignsandprocedure verifica-tions.InOctoberof1981,hereceivedSeniorReactorOperatorcertification.

Asaninstruction coordinator, heisresponsible formeetingtheoverallobjectives ofallcustomersimulator coursesandthedirection ofinstructional activities offifteeninstructors, withparticipation directlyinstudentandinstructor evaluations andaudits.Previousworkexperience includesanassignement asaninstructor tothereactorcontrolsdivision, andasaqualified reactoroperatorandshutdownreactoroperatoronanavalnuclearprototype.

Asatrainingengineer, Mr.Wartenberg alsoassistedinthestartupoftheSNUPPSIIsimulator.

6755B:1/062883 B-37 G.ALLENELLIFF,EDUCATION:

Ph.D.,M.S.,B.S.,Industrial Engineering/Operations

Research, TexasARMUniversity, 1973Industrial Engineering/Operations

Research, TexasARMUniversity, 1971'ndustrial Engineering, TexasARMUniversity, 1970AFFILIATIONS:

AmericanInstitute ofIndustrial Engineers.

Operations ResearchSocietyofAmericaAlphaPiMu(Industrial Engineering HonorSociety)SigmaXiPROFESSIONAL BRIEF:Dr.ElliffisaBranchManagerinEssexCorporation's Alexandria office.Heiscurrently responsible formanagement, technical direction, andreviewofprojectsfornuclearindustryclientsoftheIndustrial ServicesDepartment.

Dr.Elliff'sutilityexperience includesdirectprojectmanagement responsibility forseveralnuclearpowerplantcontrolroomdesignreviews,aswellasmanagement oversight andreviewofrelatedprojectsfornuclearindustryclients.Hehas10yearsconsulting experience withthemilitary(Navy,AirForce,andOfficeoftheSecretary ofDefense);

otherfederalagencies(Department ofEnergy,Department ofTransportation);

andprivatesectorclients(utilities, motorcarriers, railroads, militaryhardwarevendors).

Hisexperience includesappliedhumanfactorsanalysis, maintenance management, logisticsupportanalysis, lifecyclecost/design tocostanalysis, information systemvalidation, businessandfinancial management, marketanalysis, transportation operations

analysis, mathematical modelling, reliability/maintainability

analysis, production engineering, statistical qualitycontrol,andtrainingcoursedevelopment andpresentation.

PriortojoiningEssexin1981,Dr.Elliffwasassociated withEvaluation ResearchCorporation; Peat,Marwick,Mitchell, RCo.;Logistics Management Institute; andtheTexasARMUniversity graduatefaculty.Dr.Elliffalsohasthreeyearsexperience asafull-time graduatefacultymemberatTexasARMUniversity teachingindustrial engineering andoperations researchcoursesandsupervising thesisresearch.

EXPERIENCE:

CANYONRESEARCHGROUP,aDivisionofEssexCorporation (1981-Present)Manaer0erationsAnalsisBranchIndustrial ServicesDeartment-Providemanagement andtechnical direction forconductofIndustrial ServicesDepartment operations analysisprojects.

Haveprimarytechnical responsibility foralloperational taskanalysis, probabilistic riskassessment, andhumanreliability analysesfortheIndustrial ServicesDepartment.

Serveasseniortechnical resourceforapplication ofindustrial engineering andoperations researchtechniques toclientsituations.

Responsible fortechnical reviewofclientdeliverables.

B-39 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)

Providemanagement reviewofprojectplan,technical scope,andresourceestimates forIndustrial ServicesDepartment projects.

Asbranchmanager,supervise humanfactorsanalystsandlicensedSeniorReactorOperators (SROs).Assignappropriate personnel toclientprojects, asneeded.MonitorcostandschedulestatusonallIndustrial ServicesDpartmentprojectstoensurecompletion ofproductstoclientsatisfaction.

Projectmanagerfordetailedcontrolroomdesignreview(DCRDR)forPublicServiceElectricandGasCompany's HopeCreekGenerating Station(HCGS).HCGS'isaneartermoperating licenseboilingwaterreactor.Thecontrolroomisoneofthemoreadvancednuclearpowerplantcontrolr'oomsintheUnitedStatesandemploysseveralCRTs.AlsoservingasprojectmanagerforDCRDRofDonaldC.CookUnitland2controlrooms.D.C.Cookplantisanoperating plantwithseveralyearsofoperating experience.

ManageddetailedhumanfactorscontrolroomdesignreviewforTexasUtilities Generating Company's ComanchePeakSteamElectricStation(CPSES)Unitl.Evaluated controlroomforcompliance withhumanengineering principles andapplicable regulatory guidelines.

DirectedEssexhumanfactorsanalystsandSROsinassessment ofproposedclientrearrangement ofCPSEScontrolboards.Assistedclientindesignandapplication ofmimics,demarcation, andhierarchical labelingoftheCPSESUnitlcontrolboards.Developed amodelforpredicting humanreliability innuclearpowerplantcontrolroomoperations.

Foraforeignnuclearutility,developed estimates ofexpectedimprovements inoperatorreliability forsuggested backfitstoresolvethirty"genericcontrolroomdesignproblems.

Providedgeneralmanagement direction formajorprocedures development andproduction projectforaneartermoperating license(NTOL)plant.Thefirstphaseoftheprojectinvolvedrewriting/reformatting ofallemergency,

abnormal, andstandardoperating procedures.

Asaresultofprojectteamperformance, Essexwasalsoawardedcontractfordevelopment andproduction ofapproximately 300nuclearpowerplantsurveillance/test procedures.

Thisphaseinvolvedrewrite/reformat, technical review,andeditingofprocedures; technical direction ofallprojectstaff;andcoordination oftheproduction oftheprocedures frominitialwritingthroughfinalwordprocessing.

Essexprojectteamwascomposedof6to8technical writers,twoeditors,twonuclearplantoperations specialists, and8wordprocessors, plustwoshiftsupervisors fromclientorganization.

EVALUATION RESEARCHCORPORATION Vienna,Virginia(1979-1981)

PrincialEnineerandBranchManaerSstemsEnineerinandAnalsisGrouProvidedtechnical andengineering supporttoNAVSEA,NAVELEX,NAVAIR,andotherFederalgovernment clients.Thissupportincludedintegrated logistics support(ILS)analyses, systemsanalysis, systemsengineering, costanalysis, andapplication ofopera-tionsresearchtechniques forshipandsystemacquisition programsandILSfunctional offices.B-40 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)

Participated indevelopment ofNAVSEAReliability andMaintainability Technical Seminar.Performed acomparative lifecyclecost(LCC)analysisof3EREDandCHTmarinesanitation systemsforDD963classships.ResultswereaprimeinputtoNADECbriefing.

AsamemberofCAPTORProduction Readiness Review(PRR)Team,assessedthecapability ofprimecontractor andfirsttiersubcontractor toeffectively managefull-scaleproduction.

AsaresultofthePRR,thecontractors wererequiredtomakesubstantive improvements toproduction controlprocedures priortofullproduction release.Developed multipleregression modeltoprojectNavyship-building qualityassurance (QA)manpowerrequirements basedonworkloaddescriptor parameters.

Developed ananalyticapproachandplanfortrade-off andcostimpactanalysisofalternative aviationintermediate maintenance supportstrategies fortheAviationInter-mediateMaintenance Improvement ProjectOffice.Objective ofthistaskwasidentifica-tionofthecomplement ofintermediate-level maintenance equipment, spareparts,andpersonnel skillsthatwouldmostimprovemissioneffectiveness ofthedeckloadofagivenaircraftcarrier.Analyticapproachintegrated existingNavydatafilesandmodelstothegreatestextentpractical.

Managedprojecttoassessperformance andeffectiveness ofdefensecontractor inproviding supplyanddepotrepairsupportonAN/SLQ-32(V).

Evaluated timeliness, quality,andcostofdepotrepairandsupplysupportprovidedbycontractor.

Integrated andcross-validated transaction datafromnumerouscontractor internaldatasources,including ADPreports,manuallogbooks,andsourcedocuments.

Assessedoperational availability basedonanalysisofCASREPTSand0790-2Kformsanddata.Determined systemstockandmaintenance repairpartsrequirements tosupportAN/SLQ-32(V).

Assistedinconducting FY1981provisioning conference.

Preparedcontractorderstoimplement resultsofprovisioning conference.

Attendedprogramreviewsinsupportofprogramoffice.Providedtechnical reviewofLogisticSupportAnalysis(LSA)ProgramPlanforArmyStand-off TargetAcquisition System(SOTAS)undercontracttoMotorola.

SeniorAnalstandPro'ectManaerPlanninandSciencesGrou-ManagedanddirectednumerousprojectsforU.S.Department ofEnergyclients.Seniortechnical analystforquantitative analysistasksforthePlanningandSciencesGroup.Directedindependent validations ofvariousDOEandindustryinformation systemsandmodels.ManagedaprojecttovalidatetheDOECrudeOilTransferPricingSystem(ERA-51).

Projectincludedassessment ofuserrequirements, respondent reporting andmeasurement practices, andDOEdataprocessing procedures.

Qualitative andquantitative analysesfordataconsistency andvaliditywereperformed, bothwithinERA-51andbetweenERA-51andrelatedDOEreporting systems.8-41 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)

Providedtechnical andmanagement direction forquantitative dataanalysesforfourdatasystemsproviding information onmajorindustrial combustors tosupportenforce-,

mentofthePowerPlantandIndustrial FuelUseAct.SystemsanalyzedincludedtheDOEBoilerManufacturer's Report(ERA-97),

DOE1975MajorFuelBurningInstallation CoalConversion Report(FEA-C-602-S-O),

DOE1980Manufacturing Industries EnergyCon-sumptionStudyandSurveyofLargeCombustors (EIA-063),

andEPANationalEmissions DataSystem(NEDS).Developed scenarios forassessment ofrefineryindustrycapability torespondtovarioussupplyanddemandscenarios.

Analysisrequiredfamiliarity withtworefinerymodels:BonnerandMooreRefineryandPetrochemical ModelingSystem(RPMS)andTurner,Mason,Solomon(TMS)refinerymodel.RPMSandTMSmodelswerelinkedtoaccountforrefineryprocessing capabilities, transportation network,andpetroleum inventory management considerations..

Developed productpricesandcost,quality,andquantitycharacteristics ofcrudeslatesforseveralrefineries usingDOEdatainquick-reaction supportfortheOfficeofSpecialCounsel(OSC).DatawasinputtoRPMS,whichwasusedinsupportofOSCauditandcompliance analysis.

~c"PEAT>MARWICKyMITCHELLRCOWashington, D.C.(1975-1979)jISeniorConsultant andPro'ectManaer-Managedthe'evelopment andimplementa-tionofalifecyclecostbudgetary projection modelfortheHARPOONProjectOffice.Determined anddocumented logistics resources forsupportofagivenprocurement schedule; developed andvalidated predictive costestimating relationships; identified appropriation andbudgetsponsorsforeachenditemandlogisticresourcecategory; anddeveloped time-phased fundingrequirements byappropriation tosupportaparticular acquisition scenario.

Asamemberofamanagement auditteam,evaluated theanalyticcapability oftheF-16SystemProjectOfficeorganization.

Areasevaluated includedlifecyclecost/design tocost(LCC/DTC) estimation andtrackingcapability, configuration management, ILSplanningandcoordination, andassessment oftheextenttowhichacommondatabaseofcostandperformance parameters wasmaintained foruseinperforming thevariousanalytictasks.Definedanddeveloped anintegrated projecttaskmanagement information system(MIS)fortheShipboard Intermediate RangeCombatSystemProjectOffice.Surveyedinformation requirements; conducted aninventory andasse'ssment ofinformation sources;definedinformation flows;investigated information processing anddisplayalternatives; anddeveloped anMIStoprovidekeyprojectpersonnel withcurrentandprojected cost/schedule status,varianceanalyses, financial flexibility

analyses, andassessment oftheprobableimpactofpotential management decisions.

8-42 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)

Developed andpresented seminarsforcommercial clientsonlifecyclecost/design tocost,Department ofDefense(DOD)acquisition

policies, andDODmarketing.

Servedascorporate representative

'totheWeaponSystemLifeSupport(WSLS)groupunderNSIALogistics Management Committee (LOMAC).ManagedaprojectfortheFederalRailroadAdministration toperformsystemsengineering forintermodal freightsystems.Identified, described, andanalyzedthefullrangeofimprovedandinnovative components, subsystems, andsystems.Assessedproposedinnovations andimprovedtechnologies forpotential toimprove"profitability andreturnoninvestment forrail-based intermodal freightsystems;Principal Investigator foraprojecttodevelopanimprovedpassenger carmainte-nanceandutilization programfortheNationalRailroadPassenger Corporation (AMTRAK).

Specificresponsibilities includedassessment oftheeffectiveness ofthecurrentAMTRAKpassenger carmaintenance process,identification oftrade-offs betweenpassenger carmaintenance andpassenger carutilization, anddevelopment ofrecommendations forimproving boththequalityofAMTRAKmaintenance andutilization ofitspassenger carfleet.ManagedastudyfortheFederalRailroadAdministration toassessalternative organizational structures foryardsandterminals fortheUnitedStatesrailindustry.

Analyzedmanagement controlsystems,measuresofeffectiveness, andtheeffectoforganizational alternatives foryardsandterminals ontheinfrastructure oftherailindustry.

Managedprojectsforprivaterailroads involving market,operations, andtrafficanalysis, anddevelopment ofbusinessstrategies.

Foramajormotorcarrier,performed ananalysisofterminalandline-haul operations toimprovecarrierprofitability andoperational efficiency.LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE Washington, D.C.(1970-1975)SeniorResearchAssociate

-ForPMS306,underjointsponsorship withtheAssistant Secretary ofDefenseInstallations andLo'gistics),

analyzedandevaluated theabilityoftheNavy'sintermediate-level maintenance activities tosupportthesurfaceFleetinthemid-1980's.

Responsibility includedassessment oftheadequacyoftheNavy'smainte-nancedatacollection system(MDCS)indocumenting maintenance delivered totheFleet,trade-off analysestodetermine themosteffective utilization ofNavyresources insupporting thesurfaceFleet,anddevelopment ofspecificrecommendations forimprovement.

Developed amanagement information systemandtheassociated databasetoassistplannersintheOfficeoftheAssistant Secretary ofDefense(Installations andLogistics) inmakingpolicydecisions regarding avionicsstandardization.

Thesystem.wascapableofproducing annualprojections ofthedemandforavionicssystemsintermsoffunctional requirement and/orassociated hardwarebyTMSofaircraft, attheequipment level,foraircraftscheduled formajormodification oracquisition duringthe1975-1985 timeframe.

G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)

Thedatabasecouldbereadilyupdatedonanannualbasis,therebyenablingthesystemtocontinueproviding 10yearprojections.

Developed acostelementstructure (CES)forlifecyclecost(LCC)analysisoftrackedvehiclesasinputtoanLMItaskaddressing thefeasibility ofastandardized LCCCESforvarioustypesofDODsystems.TEXASARMUNIVERSITY CollegeStation,Texas(1972-'1970)Assistant Professor ofIndustrial Enineerin-Taughtgraduatecoursesandsupervised thesisresearchinoperations

research, production engineering, manufacturing processes, production management, engineering costestimating, production andinventory control,andqualityassurance tograduatestudentsinreliability andmaintainability engineering programssponsored bytheArmyMaterialCommand(nowDARCOM).Dissertation topicaddressed economicdesignofacontinuous samplingqualityassurance plan,whichhasresultedinapublication andpresentations.

PUBLICATIONS ANDTECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS

'ranco,3.,Elliff,G.A.,andTulis,E.A.Memorandum Reort-DevelomentofProductPricesforRPMSStaticRefinerModel,3une2,1981.PreparedforOfficeofTechnology andComputerSciences, OfficeofSpecialCounsel,EconomicRegulatory Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Elliff,G.A.,andFranco,3.Alicabilit ofDOEModelsinShort-Term Continenc~plannin, March27,f981.PreparedforOfficeofTechnology andComputerScience,OfficeofSpecialCounsel,EconomicRegulatory Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Elliff,G.A.Memorandum Reort-AssinrnentofCoststoCrudeOilFeedstocks forEstablishin StaticRefinerBaseCasesMarch19,1981.PreparedforOfficeofTechnology andComputerScience,OfficeofSpecialCounsel,EconomicRegulatory Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Elliff,G.A.,andTulis,E.A.Memorandum Reort-Analsisofthe"AveraeDa"ConcetforEstablishin CrudeandProductSlatesforSohioBaseCases,February9,1981.PreparedforOfficeofTechnology andComputerScience,OfficeofSpecialCounsel,EconomicRegulatory Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Elliff,G.A.,andTulis,E.A.Preliminar AnalsisoftheDOETransferPricinSstem,February1,1981.PreparedfortheOfficeofEnergyInformation Validation, EnergyInformation Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Leilich,R.H.,Elliff,G.A.,etal.SstemsEnineerinforIntermodal FreihtSstems(3volumes).

PreparedfortheFederalRailroadAdministration, U.S.Department ofTransportation, March1978.B-44 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)

Yager,R.,Elliff,G.A.,andBauer,R.StudtoDeveloanIntercitPassenerCarMaintenance andUtilization Proram,April1977.PreparedfortheFederalRailroadAdministration, U.S.DOT,andNationalRailroadPassenger Corporation (AMTRAK).Fisher,W.,Elliff,G.A.,andWhite,3.M..DODDemandforSelectedAvionicAssemblies-PhaseI.InterimReportonLMITask75-9,November1975.Shepherd, F.,Elliff,G;A.,andWroblewski, P.SurfaceShiMaintenance, LMIReport70-21,ADA008233,3anuary1975.Elliff,G.A.,andFoster,3.W."ANoteofCalculation oftheAverageFractionInspected foraContinuous SamplingPlan."International 3ournalofProduction

Research, 1975.Elliff,G.A.,andFoster,3.W."LeastCostContinuous SamplingPlans."Presented atORSA/TIMS 3ointNationalMeeting,LasVegas,Nevada,November1975.Elliff,G.A.,andFoster,3.W."Economic DesignofaMultilevel Continuous SamplingPlan."Presented atAOASymposium onLogistics, FortLee,Virginia, February1970.Elliff,G.A."AnEconomicBasiswithInspector AccuracyConsiderations forDesignofaMulti-level Continuous SamplingPlan,"unpublished doctoraldissertation, TexasARMUniversity, 1973.Elliff,G.A."CostOptimization ofaTrickling Filtration SewageTreatment FacilityUsingPatternSearchwithSummation ofGradients,"

unpublished masters'hesis, TexasARMUniversity, 1971.SECURITYCLEARANCE:

SECRET,grantedbyDISCO(1970).B-45 JOHNFFARBRY,JR.EDUCATION:

BachelorofArchitecture, Washington University, 1965.M.A.Experimental Psychology, University ofMissouri-Columbia, 1973Ph.D.Experimental Psychology, University ofMissouri-Columbia, 1978;MajorArea:HumanMemoryandCognition AFFILIATIONS:

AmericanPsychological Association (Member)Division21:SocietyofEngineering Psychologists HumanFactorsSociety(Member)Technical InterestGroup:ComputerSystemsPotomacChapteroftheHumanFactorsSociety(Member)PROFESSIONAL BRIEF:Dr.Farbry'sactivityinpsychology hasbeenconcerned withbasicresearchinhumanperformance,

teaching, andtheapplication ofpsychological knowledge tocomplexsystemsinindustrial settings.

Hisresearchactivityinvolvestheinvestigation ofstresseffectsinteracting withindividual differences.and theanalysisofhumanmemoryandlearning.

Inthefirstarea,stresseffectswereexaminedwithregardtocopingresponses inaVAhospitalenvironment.

Also,theeffectsofstressonproblem-solving behaviorwerestudiedinalaboratory setting.Thesecondareaincludesthestudyofqualitative changesinmemoryoveranextendedperiodoftimeandtheobservation oferrorbehaviorinrotelearning.

Theundergraduate coursestaughtincludeexperimental method,physiological psychology, introductory psychology andthepsychology oflanguage.

DuringhisthreeyearsatEssex,hisworkhasbeenprimarily concerned withtheanalysisandevaluation oftheoperator-machine interface innuclearpowerplantcontrolrooms.Thisworkhasbeendirectedprimarily totheevaluation ofconventional PWRandBWRmaincontrolroomsintheU.S.andaBWRradwastecontrolroominJapan.Hehasconducted designstudiesofcontrolpanelcomponent arrangement inbothcases.Thetwomostrecentprojectshavefocusedontheevaluation ofCRTdisplaysystemsinadvancedcontrolroomsforBWRandPWRfacilities inJapan.EXPERIENCE:

ESSEXCORPORATION (1980-Present)roomofChubuElectricPowerCompany.Thisworkincludedtheupdatingandreorgani-zationofCRTspecifications; analysisofpopulation stereotype datafromclientoperations personnel andapplication oftheresultstoCRTevaluation.

Conducted reviewoffunctional allocation betweencontrolroomoperatorvs.CRT,system andaninformation availability analysis.

Evaluation, ofCRTdisplaysystemincluding featuresofCRTformatorganization, color/symbol schemes,alarmsystem,CRTinformation accessandlabeling.

ResearchScientist.

Developed generalguidelines and'criteria tosupportdesignofmaincontrolroominanuclearpowerplant.Theguidelines weredirectedtotheB-47 3OHNE.FARBRY,3R.(Continued) arrangement andgroupingofcomponents andcomponent systemsonthemaincontrolpanel,thedetermination oftheprofileandfloorplanconfiguration ofthecontrolpanelandtheplanningofthecontrolroomfacility.

ResearchScientist.

Developed population stereotype questionnaire forcontrolpanelelementswithresultsappliedtostereotype specification foranadvancedcontrolroom(ACR)ofapressurized

'waterreactorunitforMitsubishi HeavyIndustries.

Alsoevaluated CRTpagesforACRandstudiedoperatormovementamongCRTs.Developed voice-computercommunication guidelines tosupportinteractive computersystems.Pro'ectEnineer.Evaluation ofproposedandexistingcontrolpanelsforradwastecontrolroomofboilingwaterreactorplantfor3apanAtomicPowerCompany.Short-andlong-term recommendations weremaderegarding thearrangement ofpanelcomponents, proposedcomponent typesandannunciator system.Therecommendations includedadesignproposalforthecomponent arrangement oftworadwastecontrolsubpanels.

ResearchAssociate.

Performed humanfactorsevaluation andadesignstudyformaincontrolpanelarrangement ofnewpressurized waterreactorpowerplantforCarolinaPowerandLight.Alsoparticipated inon-siteevaluation ofindividual components andpanelarrangement formaincontrolpanelofexistingboilingwaterreactorplantandpreparedlabelbackfitsupplement.

HELLMUTH,OBATA,ANDKASSABAUM, INC.SaintLouis,Missouri(1978-1980)Architectural Draftsman/Research.

Commercial structures:

preparation ofcon-struction documents, statistical researchonfirmsdistribution ofmanpoweracrossdifferent buildingtypes.Clientcontact,coordination withstructural andmechanical engineers, buildingcodeanalysis.

CHINNANDASSOCIATES

Columbia, Missouri(1977-1978)Architectural Draftsman.

Commercial andresidential structures.

Coordination withstructural andmechanical engineers, preparation ofconstruction documents suchassiteplans,floorplans,elevations, construction detailsandperspectives.

STEPHENSCOLLEGEColumbia, Missouri(1976-1977)Instructor.

Department ofPsychology.

Fullresponsibility forsixcoursesinBasicPsychology andcoursesinPsychobiology andthePsychology ofLanguage.

Also,studentadvisingandstaffseminarparticipation.

B-48 3OHNE.FARBRY,3R.(Continued)

MID-MISSOURI MENTALHEALTHCENTER,Columbia, Missouri(1970-1976)ResearchAssistant

-Coordinated medical,research, andtechnical staffforpsychological researchonstressinhospitalpatientsreceiving adifficult examination (endoscopy).

Alsorecording ofpolygraph databeforeandduringexamination, pre-andpost-patient interviews, datareduction/preliminary

analysis, libraryresearch, andassis-tancewiththepreparation ofavarietyofjournalarticles.

CHINN,DARROUGH, ANDCOMPANYColumbia, Missouri(1973-1970)Architectural Draftsman.

Commercial andresidential structures:

preparation ofconstruction documents, coordination withstructural andmechanical engineers.

UNIVERSITY OFMISSOURIColumbia, Missouri(1973)TeachinAssistant.

Department ofHomeEconomics.

Architectural DesignII:Taughtdesign,process,planning, anddevelopment ofdraftingskills.Delineation course:Emphasisoncolormediaappliedtointeriorperspective drawing.UNIVERSITY OFMISSOURIColumbia, Missouri(1969-1973)"TeachinAssistant.

Department ofPsychology.

GeneralExperimental Psychology (Laboratory Instructor; GeneralPsychology (CourseCoordinator, Discussion Leader);andResearchMethods,TheSenses,AppliedPsychology (Assistant).

UNIVERSITY OFMISSOURIColumbia, Missouri(1969-1971)ResearchAssistant.

Department ofPsychology.

Designofgraphicstimuli(faceassistance withthewritingofjournalarticles.

HELLMUTH, OBATA,ANDKASSABAUM, INC.*(1966-1968)SaintLouis,MissouriArchitectural Draftsman.

Commercial structures:

documents.

preparation ofconstruction A.L.AYDELOTTANDASSOCIATES Memphis,Tennessee (1965)Architectural Draftsman.

Commercial structures:

documents.

preparation ofconstruction B-49 3OHNE.FARBRY,3R.(Continued)

TECHNICAL REPORTS:SummarReort:AHumanEnineerinReviewofanAdvancedControlRoomCRTDislaSstemfortheChubuElectricPowerComan.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,inpress.(withD.Eike)HumanEnineerinSecifications foranAdvancedControlRoomCRTDislaSstemfortheChubuElectricPowerComan.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,inpress.(withR.Kane,S.Fleger,andT.O'Donoghue)

AFunctional Allocation ReviewofanAdvancedControlRoomCRTDislaSstemfortheChubuElectricPowerComan.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,inpress,(withT.Harding).

AHumanEnineerinEvaluation ofanAdvancedControlRoomCRTDislaSstemfortheChubuElectricPowerComan.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,inpress.(withS.Fleger,R.Kane,T.Harding,andD.Pilsitz).

ResonseSterotesof3aaneseControlRoom0eratorstoElementsofCRTDisla~Sstems.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,October,1982.AHumanEnineerinEvaluation ofCRTFormatsCRTsandKeboardsfortheMitsubishi HeavIndustries AdvancedControlRoom.Technical ReportforMitsubisi HeavyIndustries, 3apan,3uly1982.withR.Kane,S.Fleger,T.HardingandF.Piccione)

Extracontractual Studieson:StressMethodforDesinCriteriaEvaluation andPCCConfiurationStud.Technical ReportforMitsubishi HeavyIndustries, 3apan,3uly,12.withR.Kane,D.Metcalf,R.Benel,S.Fleger)Resonsestereoesof3aanesenuclearowerlantcontrolroomoerators.StudyforMitsubishi HeavyIndustries, December1981.(withR.KaneandS.Fleger)Sstem-SecificSecifications BasicConsoleEvaluation andHumanEnineerinLibrarBibliorahforAdvancedControlRoom.Technical ReportforMitsubishi HeavyIndustries, 3apan,3uly1982.withR.Kane,H.Manning,S.Fleger,T.O'Donoghue, N.Tulloh,andL.Grealis)Humanfactorsevaluation reortontheTsuruaNumberOneNewRadwasteControlRoom.Finalreportpreparedforthe3apanAtomicPowerCompany,September 1981.(withA.Strong)LabelbackfitsulementBSEP1andBSEP2.PreparedforCarolinaPowerandLight,September 1981.B-50 3OHNE.FARBRY,3R.(Continued)

Humanfactorsevaluation reortfortheBrunswick Unit1andUnit2ControlRoom.FinalReportprepared!for CarolinaPowerandLight,September 1981.(withW.Talley,D.Beith,E.Talley,andT.3ustice)Humanfactorsdesinevaluation reortfortheShearonHarrisUnit1controlroom.FinalreportpreparedforCarolinaPowerandLight,September"'1981.

(withW.Talley,3.Haher,T.Amerson,D.Beith,andT.3ustice)3OURNALARTICLES:

Control-display integration onlarge,multi-system controlpanels.Proceedin softheHumanFactorsSociet25thAnnualMeetin.Rochester, NewYork1981.(withT.HardingandK.MalloryEvaluative persistence:

Saltfromtheevaporative forgetting process.Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979,39(No.8),0068B.Greaterrepetition oferrorsunderperformance comparedtoobservation inmultiple-choicehumanlearning.

PercetualandMotorSkills,1973,37,909-950.,

(withM.H.MarxandD.Witter)Psychological preparation forendoscopy.

Gastrointestinal Endosco,1977,20,9-13.(withR.H.Shipley,3.H.Butt,andB.Horwitz),Preparation forastressful medicalprocedure:

Effectofamountofstimuluspreexposure andcopingstyle.3ournalofConsultin andClinicalPsvcholo, 1978,06,099-507.(withR.H.Shipley,3.H.Butt,andB.HorwitzLong-term persistence ofresponse-repetition tendencies basedonperformance orobser-vation.BulletinofthePschonomicSociet,1978,8,65-67.(withD.W.WitterandM.H.Marx)PRESENTATIONS:

Evaluative persistence:

Alongtermmemoryforfirstimpressions.

Paperpresented attheconvention oftheAmericanPsychological Association,

Montreal, September 1980.Videotape preparation forastressful medicalprocedure:

Effectsofnumberofexposures.

Paperpresented atthemeetingoftheAssociation forAdvancement ofBehaviorTherapy,NewYorkCity,December1976.(withR.H.Shipley,3.H.Butt,andB.Horwitz)8-51 ASw.CIn EDUCATION University ofHartford, B.S.,Mechanical Engineering, 1965UnionCollege,graduatecourses1966-1969 Northeastern University, graduatecourses1969-1970 GeneralElectricAdvancedCourseinEngineering EXPERIENCE AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation, 1983-Present NUSCORPORATIONS 1978-1983 AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation, 1971-1978 StoneaWebsterEngineering Company,1969-1971 KnollsAtomicPowerLaboratory, 1965-1969 AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation

-Manager,NuclearSafetyandLicensing.

Management anddirection ofsectionpersonnel incarryingoutassignedresponsibilities andactivities whichincludesmaintenance ofNRCrelateddocumentation, reviewcoordination, andresolution ofallmatterspertaining tonuclearsafetyaffecting AEPSC.Provideknowledge, expertise, andanalytical capability innuclearsafetyrelatedmattersnecessary tosupportplantoperations andlicensing efforts.IalsoserveasSecretary, NSDRC,andasCorporate Cognizant Engi'neer forNuclearSafety.NUS-Havebeenresponsible foravarietyofsafetyanalysisandlicensing activities insupportofdomesticandforeignutilities.

Typicalactivities haveincluded:

ServiceforeightmonthsasamemberoftheOn-SiteSafetyReviewGroup,SalemGenerating Stationgtechnical specification coordinator foralargedomesticutilityyprojectmanagerforNUSsupportactivities ontheFSARupdateoftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantyprojectmanagerfortheBigRockPointPlantSpentFuelrackAdditionConsolidated Environmental ImpactEvaluation andSafetyAnalysisReportsandtechnical advisortotheJapaneseSurveyGrouponnewsitingconcepts.

UntilOctober1982wasManager,NuclearWasteManagement Department.

Dutiesincludedprojectmanagement andtechnical contribution tofulfillNUScontractual responsibilities totheBasaltWasteIsolation ProgramandtheOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation.

Varioussafetyandlicensing activities performed underthesecontracts includeddevelopment oflicensing coordination plans,performance ofoperational andlongtermradiological safetyandriskanalysesfornuclearwasterepositories, development ofapreliminary safetyanalysisreportforanuclearwasterepository inadomedsaltformation, development ofguidelines foraqualityassurance program,andperformance ofcostbenefitanalyses.

AlsoservedasamemberofanONWI-sponsored taskforceongeotechnical andanthropomorphic problemsassociated withsitinganuclearwasterepository inadomedsaltformation.

JhNES0FEZNSTEIH PAGB2AmericanBlectricpcnrerServiceCorporation

-LeadEngineerSafetyAnalysisandsubsequently Hanager,NuclearSafetyanLicensing.

Dutiesincludedsupportoflicensing, design/construction, andoperation oftheDonaldC.CookNucleartthefirstNestinghouse PNRwithanicecondenser containment tobelicensedforoperation.

Princpa1ibilitywastoassurethatallsafetysystemsweredesignedandanalyzedinamanneracceptable totheUnitedStatesNuclearRegulatory Commission.

Involvedinmanyfirst-of-a-kind

analyses, systemsdesign,andtechnical speccaonifitidevelopment intheareasofheattransfer,fluiddynamics, thermalhydraulicst postLOCAyghdroengeneration, icesublimation, radiological doseanalyses, etc.Responsible fortechnical andadministrative coordinat'ion ofmajorprojectssuchasplantmodifications requiredtomeetNRCconcernsonhighenergylinebreaksoutsidecontainment, ECCSsystemsdesign,andenvironmental qualificationofonsibilit safetyrelatedequipment.

Hadleadtechnical responsib yforAmericanElectxicPowerformeetingswiththeNRCandforpresentations totheAdvisoryCommittee onReactorSafeguards.

Nasresponseoxiblfthetechnical inputandcoordination ofsafetyreviewsofdesignchanges,theFinalSafetyayRtndamendments andoralandwrittencorrespondence withtheNRC.Supervisory responsibility fordevelopme tcommitment lists,Nestinghouse ownersgroupactivities, firettirogramN-lists,technical specifications, securityplan,emergency plan,internalQAprocedur, peslanthealthphysicssupport,nuclearsafetyandlicensing aspectsff1eloadsprobabilistic riskassessment studies>etc.WasSecretary ofNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee, memberofEdisonElectricInstitute ad-hoccommittee tocommentonNASH-1400'ompany representative tojointutility-AEC-vendortaskforceonwatexreactorsafetyresearch(latertakenoverbyEPRI),memberofjointTVA-DUKE-AEP icecondenser taskforce,andChairmanofHeliumBreederAssociates Committee toreviewsafetyandlicensing problemswithgascooledfastreactors.

StoneSWebster-Nasresponsible fordeveloping analysismethodsforcontainment designandpost-LOCA hydrogengeneration analysis.

Manyassumptions fromthisworkwerebntlyadaptedbytheNRCintheirpublished Regulatory Guide1.7~Alsoperformed prelimyinarevaluations todetermine whetherpx'obabilistic techniques couldbeusedfornuclearpowerplantdesign.KnllAtomicPowerLab-Performed thermalhydraulic analysisofnuclearreactors, des'nedtestsandexperiments, anddelivered traininglecturestoNavalpersonnel.

gAP JAMESGoPEZNSTEZN PAGE3EDUCATIONAL HONORSUniversity ofHartfordRegent'sAwardforbeingtopstudentinMechanical Engineering, 1964and1965AmericanSocietyofMechanical Engineers GreaterHartfordChapterAnnualAward1965KappaMu-HonoraryEngineering Fraternity PUBLICATIONS "PostDBAContainment HydrogenMethodsforCalculating andControlling HydrogenAccumulation'co-author) gpresented atANSTopicalMeetingonPowerReactorSystemandComponentst Williamsburg<

Virginia, 1970."SurveyMethodsforAssessment ofRadiological ReleasefromGeological Repositories" (leadauthor)gpresented atANSAnnualMeetingAtlanta,Georgia,June1979.'Procedures,

Barriers, StateVariables, andProcesses Important toNearFieldAnalysis"

-(leadauthor)ypresented atANSAnnualMeeting,LasVegas,Nevada,June1980."Evaluation ofConsequences toRiskofTimeFanCoolingUnitsareOutofServiceatSalemGenerating Station,"

preparedforPSE&GgNovember1981."Evaluation ofAnalytical ProblemsAssociated withChangeover toHotLegRecirculation Following aHypothetical LossofCoolantAccidentatSalemGenerating Station,"

preparedforPSE&G,October1981."Evaluation ofSafetyConcernsAssociated withLossofCoolantAccidentWithoutAutomatic Actuation ofContainment Sprays,"preparedforPSE&G,September 1981."Evaluation ofEffeetofDesignBasisAccidents onProposedChangestoAuxiliary Feedwater SystematSalemNuclearPowerGenerating Station,"

preparedforPSE&G,October1981."Evaluation ofHeatBalanceCodeUsedatSalemGenerating Station,"

preparedforPSE&G,December1981."Evaluation ofInadvertent HumanIntrusion intoaSaltDomeRepository bySolutionMining"(co-author) draftreportpreparedforOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation, September 1980~"Criticality AnalysisforaBrineFilledCavityinaSpentFuelNuclearWasteRepository LocatedinaDomedSaltFormation" (co-author),

NUS-TM-326, January1980.

JAMESQoFEZNSTEIN PAGE4"Questionnaire forPerforming SafetyEvaluations forChangestoStructures, Systems,andComponents attheSalemNuclearPlant,"preparedforPSEaG,July1981.'DonaldC.CookHuclearPlant,UnitHo.1,ResultsoftheDecember1974InitialWeighingProgram'repared forAmericanElectricPcnrer,March1975"LongTermEvaluation oftheIceCondenser System:ResultsoftheJanuary1976andApril1976IceWeighingPrograms" (leadauthor)July1976."LongTermEvaluation oftheIceCondenser System!ResultsoftheJanuary1977IceWeighingProgram"(leadauthor),May1977'SurveyofNewTypesofSitingResearchforNuclearPowerPlants"(leadauthor)NUS-4068, April1982."BigRockPointPlant:SpentFuelRackAdditionConsolidated Environmental ImpactEvaluation andSafetyAnalysis,"

(co-author),

April1982."Suggested QualityAssurance Requirements foraMinedGeologicRepository" (co-author),

NUS-TM-338, May1981."SafetyAnalysisReportAnnotated OutlineforaNuclearWasteRepository inaDeepGeologicFormation,

"(co-author)

NUS-TM-360, April1981."Preliminary Information ReportforaConceptual Reference Repository inaDeepGeological Formation,"

(co-author) draftreportpreparedforofficeofNuclearWasteIsolation, January1980."MethodforDeveloping theQ-listforaGeologicRepository" (co-author),

NUS-TM-343, April1981."APreliminary Assessment ofthePNLStrontium HeatSourceDevelopment ProgramtoDetermine itsAdequacyforLicensing PurposesinFY1981,"(co-author) draftreportpreparedforBattelleNorthwest, August1979."Annotated Bibliography foraCostBenefitStudyofSeveralAspectsofaNuclearWasteRepository" NUS-3528, July1980."CostBenefitStudyofSeveralAspectsofaGeologicNuclearWasteRepository" preparedforBasaltWasteIsolation Program,NUS-3569, April1980.

JAMESGoFKINSTEIN PAGE5"QualityAssurance Classification Requirements forStructures, Systems,Components, andActivities RelatedtoaMinedGeologicRepository forPermanent Disposal'ofHighLevelNuclearWaste"(co-author) preparedasadraftforOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation, March1980."Applicable Requirements, Supporting Sequences, andPreliminary StrategyfortheOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation Licensing Coordination Plan(co-author),

NUS-3267, October1980.NWTSLicensing PlanforHighLevelWasteRepositories inGeologicFormations (co-author),

preparedasadraftforOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation, September 1978."DonaldC.CookNuclearPlant,Units1and2,FinalSafetyAnalysisReport-Update"(pro)ectmanagerandleadcontributor),

June1982."DonaldC.CookNuclearPlant,Units1and2,FinalSafetyAnalysisReportandAmendments" (co-author)

.

APPENDIXCANNUNCIATOR SURVEYTASKPLAN6755B:1/062883C-1 181TP-3.11May1983D-C.COOKNUCLEARPLANTDCRDRPROGRAMHLMANFACTORSTASKPLANFORTHEANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMREVIEWCanyonResearchGroupTheEssexBuilding333NorthFairfaxStreetAlexandria, Virginia22314(7O3)S48-4SOOPREPAREDBY:Signature DCRDRDesignReviewTeamHumanFactorsConsultant DateAPPROVEDBY:Signature DCRDRProjectReviewTeamDate)PERFORMED BY:Signature DCRDRDesignReviewTeamHumanFactorsConsultant Date)

D.C.COOKNUCLEARPLANTDCRDRPROGRAMANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMREVIEWTP-3.11May1983RECORDOFREVISIONS Rev.DateDescrition 181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983TABLEOFCONTENTS1.0OBJECTIVES2.0REVIEWTEAMSELECTION ANDRESPONSIBILITIES 3.0'RITERIA Pacae4.0PROCEDURES 4.1GeneralInstructions 4.2DataCollection 4.3Analysis5.0EQUIPMENT/FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 6.0INPUTSANDDATAFORMS7.0OUTPUTSANDRESULTS8.0FIGURESANDTABLES'"9.0PROCEDURE EXCEPTIONS A.CRITERIAB.DATAFORMSC.CRITERIAMATRIXD.TASKPLANCRITIQUEAPPENDICES 181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19831.0OBJECTIVES a.Toassesstowhatdegreetheannunciator systemconformstothegenericcriteriainNUREG-0700.

b.Toidentifyanddocumentanyfeaturesintheannunciator systemdesignthatdonotconformtothecriteriainNUREG-0700.

c.Toidentifyanddocumentanyplant-specific designconventions andotherplant-specific humanfactorscriterianotdefinedinNUREG-0700.

2.0 REVIEWTEAMSELECTION

ANORESPONSIBILITIES a.Ahumanfactorsspecialist toconductthedatacollection andanalysisandtopreparethetaskreport.b.Aclientnuclearoperations specialist tosupplyplantsystemsinformation concerning alarmparameters andalarmresponseprocedures.

c.AclientplantIhCengineertoassistinidentifying relevantplantsystemsinformation.

3.0CRITERIAThecriteriaarefromNUREG-0700; paragraphs 6.3.1.1;6.3.1.2athroughd(2);6.3.1.3athroughd;6.3.1.4aandb;6.3.1.5athroughb(3);6.3.2.lathroughf;6.3.3.1athroughb(2);6.3.2.2aandb;6.3.3.1athroughc(3);6.3.3.2athroughf(2);6.3.3.3athroughf;6.3.3.4athroughd;6.3.3.5athroughd(6);6.3.4.1athroughd(2);6.3.4.2athroughc;6.3.4.3aandb;6.5.1.6athroughc(2)ande(1)through3(3);and6.6.6.2a, b,andc(seeAppendixA).4.0PROCEDURES 4.1GeneralInstructions 4.1.1Preparation andConductofProcedures a.Priortoconductofthistask,ensurethatallrequireddataforms,plantdocumentation, engineering

drawings, equipment, andmaterials areavailable.

Ensurethatpermission hasbeen'btained forallrequiredaccesstothecontrolroomorotherplantareas.

181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983b.Recordallexceptions, deviations, orchanges"totheseprocedures inSection9.0ofthisTaskPlan.Numbereachentrysequentially, startingwith1.Includeanexplanation (technical justification) astowhytheexception, deviation, orchangewasmade.4.1.2TaskPlanCritiqueUponcompletion of.thistask,fillouttheTaskPlanCritiquecontained

'inAppendixD.Submitthecompleted critiquetoyou'rsupervisor orprojectmanager.4.2DataCollection a.Dataarecollected usingvariousmethodsandprocedures consistihg ofmeasurements, observations, interviews andquestionnaires, anddocumentreviews.,AppendixCillustrates thedistribution ofthecriteriaforthevariousmethods.b.Measurements andobservations shouldbemadeforallitemscontained ontheMeasurements dataformsandObservations checklists contained inAppendixB.c.Theoperatorquestionnaire (Appendix B)shouldbeadministered toatleast50,percentofthelicensedreactoroperators fortheplant.Administration maybeconducted

.singlyorinagroup,butshouldbeproctored ormonitored.

d.TheresultsoftheSystemFunctionandTaskAnalysistasksshouldbereviewed-forannunciator-relevant datainreference to6.3.3.1;6.3.1.4a; 6.3.3bandd(2);6.3.3s4aandc;6.3.43a;and6.6.6.2a(l),

(2),and(3).e.Inadditiontothereviewresultsfromd,above,plantdocumentation shouldbereviewedtoverifytheitemslistedintheDocumentReviewChecklist inAppendixB.Therequiredplantdocuments include:1.Annunciator ResponseProcedures 2.Administrative Procedures relevanttoannunciators.

4D~Analslsa.Alldeviations fromthecriteriashallberecordedonHumanEngineering Discrepancy (HED)reports(Appendix B).Recordedinformation shallincludetheinstru-mentorinstruments involved(e.g.,auditoryalarmhorns,specificlighttiles,etc.),adescription oftheproblemincluding the0700paragraph numberofthecriteria, andarecommended solution.

181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983'b.Datacollection method(s) shallalsoberecordedontheHEDform(seeAppendixB).Wheredatafromtwoormoresourcesarecontradictory, resolution oftheconflictthroughdatareviewandclientinterview shallbemade.c.UsetheanalysisaidsfromAppendixBforalldatareduction andanalysis.

Uponcompletion ofallanalyses, ensurethatthecriteriainAppendixAareproperlyannotated (asspecified intheanalysisaids).d.Submitthecompleted taskplantoyourimmediate supervisor forreview.Uponprojectmanagement

approval, initiateTaskReport3.1.5.0EQUIPMENT ANDFACILITYREQUIREMENTS a4b.coAccesstothecontrolroom.Soundlevelmeter.Protractor andtapemeasure.d.Flashcomparator.

6.0INPUTSANDDATAFORMSa1b.cod.e.Annunciator ResponseProcedures Annunciator Administrative Procedures Completed TaskReportsfor:1.SystemFunctionandTaskAnalysis2.LabelsandLocationAids3.Maintainability CriteriaList(Appendix A)Thefollowing fromAppendixB:l.Measurements DataForms2.Questionnaire 3.Observations Checklist 4.Documentation ReviewChecklist 5.AnalysisAids6.HEDReportFormsf.CriteriaMatrix(Appendix C)g.TaskPlanCritiqueForm(Appendix D) 181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19837.0OUTPUTSANDRESULTSa.CompletedHEDsb.Completed TaskReport.

181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19838.0FIGURESANDTABLESNone.

181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19839.DPROCEDURE EXCEPTIONS Thefollowing exceptions, deviations, andchangesweremadetotheseprocedures duringconductofthetask(includeastatement ofjustification oneachitem):

ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983APPENDIXACRITERIA ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19836.3.1.1GENERALSYSTEMDESIGNAnnunciator warningsystemsaretheprimarycontrolroominterface toimmediately alerttheoperatortooutof.tolerance changesinplantcon.dition.Annunciator warningsystemsconsistofthreemajorsubsystems:

(a)anauditoryalertsubsystem, (b)avisualalarmsubsystem, and(c)anoperatorresponsesubsystem (seeExhibit6,3-1).Together, thesethreesubsystems shouldbedesignedtoprovideapreferred operational sequenceforannunciator warningsasindicated inExhibit6.32.N/AYESCOMMENTS8.3,12ALARMPARAMETER SELECTION a.b.C.SETPOINTS-The limitsorsetpointsforinitiating theannunciator warningsystemshouldbeestablished tomeetthefollowing goals:(1)Alarmsshouldnotoccursofrequently astobeconsidered anuisancebytheoperators.

(2)However,setpointsshouldbeestablished togiveoperators adequatetimetore-spondtothewarningcondition beforeaseriousproblemdevelops.

GENERALALARMS(1)Alarmsthatrequirethecontrolroomoperatortodirectanauxiliary operatortoagivenplantlocationforspecificinformation shouldbeavoided.(2)Ifgeneralalarmsmustbeused,theyshouldonlybeusedforconditions thatallowadequatetimeforauxiliary operatoractionandsubsequent controlroomoperatoraction,MULTICHANNEL ORSHAREDALARMS(1)Annunciators withinputsfrommorethanoneplantparameter mtpointshouldbeavoided.Multi.inputalarmsthatsummarize single-input annunciators

.elsewhere inthecontrolroomareanexception, (2)Wheremulti-input annunciators mustbeused,analarmprintoutcapability shouldbeprovided.

Thespecifics ofthealarmshouldbeprintedonanalarmtyperwithsufficient speedandbufferstoragetocaptureallalarmdata.

ANNUNC1ATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nlay19836,3,1.2ALARMPAR'AMETER SELECTION (Cont'd)N/AYESHOCONMENTSc.MULTICHANNEL ORSHAREDALARMS(Cont'd)(3)Areflashcapability shouldbeprovidedtoallowsubsequent alarmstoactivatetheauditoryalertmechanism andreflashthevisualtileeventhoughthefirstalarmmaynothavebeencleared.d.MULTI.UNITALARMS-(1)Alarmsforanysharedplantsystemsshouldbeduplicated inallcontrolrooms.(2)Whenanitemofsharedequipment isbeingoperatedfromonecontrolroom,astatusdisplayorsignalshouldbepro.videdinallothercontrolroomswhichcouldpotentially controlthisequipment.

6,3.1.3FIRSTOUTANNUNCIATORS a.REACTORSYSTEM(1)Aseparatefirstoutpanelshouldbeprovidedforthereactorsystem.(2)Thefirstoutpanelshouldconsistofseparateannunciator tilesforeachoftheautomatic reactortripfunctions.

{3)Intheeventofareactortrip,thetileassociated.

withtheeventshouldilluminate, andnoother.b,TURBINE.GENERATOR SYSTEM-Aseparatefirstoutpanel,similarinfunctiontothereactorsystempanel,isrecommended.

c.POSITION-First outpanelsshouldbelocateddirectlyabovethemaincontrolworkstationforthesystem.d.APPLICATION-First outannunciators shouldconformtothegeneralauditory, visual,andoperatorresponseguidelines ofthissection.A-2 ANNUNClATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay19836,3.1.4PRIORITIZATION0.LEVELSOFPRIORITY(1)Prioritization shouldbeaccomplished usingarelatively small(24)numberofprioritylevels.H/AYES'OMMENTS(2)Prioritization shouldbebasedonacontinuum ofimportance,

severity, orneedforoperatoractioninoneormoredimensions, e.g.,likelihood ofreactortrip,releaseofradiation.

Exhibit6.3-3providesanexampleofprioritization basedonthreelevelsofprioritization.

b,PRIORITYCODING(1)Somemethodforcodingthevisualsignalsforthevariousprioritylevelsshouldbeemployed.

Acceptable methodsforprioritycodingincludecolor,position, shape,orsymboliccoding.(2)Auditorysignalcodingforprioritylevelisalsoappropriate.

SeeGuideline 62.2.3forrecommended codingtechniques.

6.3.1.5CLEAREDALARMSa.AUDITORYSIGNAL-Cleared alarmsshouldhaveadedicated, distinctive audiblesignalwhichshouldbeoffinitedurationb.VISUALSIGNAL-The individual tileshouldhaveoneofthefollowing:

(1)Aspecialflashrate(twiceorone.halfthenormalflashrateispreferred, toallowdiscrimination),

or(2)Reducedbrightness, or(3)Aspecialcolor,consistent withtheoverallcontrolroomcolorcoding scheme,pro-ducedbyadiffeentlycoloredbulbbehindthetile.

ANNUNClATOR SYSTEMTP-3.1IMay19836.3.2.1SIGNALDETECTION N/AYESNOCONTENTSatb,C.INTENSITY-The signalshouldbesuchthatoperators canreliablydiscernthesignalabovetheambientcontrolroomnoise.Anominalvalueof10dB(A)aboveaverageambientnoiseisgenerally

adequate, CONTROL-Signalintensity, if,adjustable, shouldbecontrolled byadministrative procedure.

LIMITS-Thesignalshouldcapturetheoperator's attention butshouldnotcauseirritation orastartledreaction.

d.DETECTION-Each auditorysignalshouldbeadjustedtoresultinapproximately equaldetection levelsatnormaloperatorworkstationsintheprimaryoperating area.e,RESET-Theannunciator auditoryalertmechanism shouldautomatically resetwhenithasbeensilenced.

f;.IDENTIFICATION-Theoperatorshouldbeabletoidentifytheworkstationorthesystemwheretheauditoryalertsignaforiginated.

Separateauditorysignalsateachworkstationwithintheprimaryoperating areaarerecommended.

6.3.2.2AUDITORYCODINGa.b.LOCALIZATION (1)Auditorycodingtechniques shouldbeusedwhentheoperatorworkstationassociated withthealarmisnotintheprimaryoperating area.(2)Codedsignalsfromasingleaudiosourceshoufdnotbeusedtoidentifyindividual workstationswithintheprimaryoper-atingarea.PRIORITI2ATION-Coding maybeusedtoindicatealarmpriority.

(,".eeGuideline 6.3.1.4.)

A-4 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19836.3.3.1VISUALANNUNCIATOR PANELSLOCATION-Visual alarmpanelsshouldbelocatedabovetherelatedcontrolsanddisplayswhicharerequiredforcorrective ordiagnostic actioninresponse'to thealarm.(SeeExhibit6.34.)b.LABELING~(1)Eachpanelshouldbeidentified byalabelabovethepanel.(2)Panelidentification labelheightshouldbeconsistent withasubtended visualangleofatfeast15minuteswhenviewedfromacentra(positionwithintheprimaryoperating area.YESCOMMENTS6.3.3.2VISUALALARMRECOGANDIDENTa.FLASHING-Thespecifictile(s)onanannun-ciatorpanelshoulduseflashingillumination toindicateanafarrpcondition.

b.FLASHRATE-Flashratesshouldbefromthreetcfiveflashespersecondwithapproxi-matelyequalonandofftimes.c.FLASHERFAILURE-fncaseofflasherfailureofanalarmedtile,thetilelightshouldilluminate andburnsteadily.

d.CONTRASTDETECTABILITY-Thereshouldbehighenoughcontrastbetweenalarmingandsteady.ontiles,andbetweenilluminated andnon-illuminated tiles,sothatoperators inanormallyilluminated controlroomhavenoproblemdiscriminating

alarming, steadywn, andsteadywff visualtiles.e."DARK"ANNUNCIATOR PANELS-A"dark"annunciator panelconceptshouldbeused.Thismeansthatundernormaloperating conditions noannunciators wouldbeillumi-nated;atlofthevisualtilesoftheannunciator panelswouldbe"dark."EXTENDEDDURATIONILLUMINATION-tfanannunciator tilemustbe"ON"foranextendedperiodduringnormaloperations (e.g.,duringequipment repairorreplacement),

itshouldbe:(1)Distinctively codedforpositiverecog-nitionduringthisperiod,and(2)Controlled byadministrative procedures.

A-5 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19838,3b.C.Cl0~e,,3.3ARRANGEMENT OFVISUALALARMTILESMATRIXORGANIZATION

-Visualalarmsshouldbeorganized asamatrixofvisualalarmtileswithineachannunciator panel.FUNCTIONAL GROUPING-Visual alarmtilesshouldbegroupedbyfunctionorsystemwithineachannunciator panel.Forexample,arearadiation alarmsshouldbegroupedononepanel,notspreadthroughout thecontrolroom.LABELINGOFAXES(1)Theverticalandhorizontal axesofannunciator panelsshouldbelabeledwithalphanumerics forreadycoordinate designation ofaparticular visualtile.(2)Coordinate designation ispreferred ontheleftandtopsidesoftheannunciator panel.(3)Letterheightforcoordinate designation shouldbeconsistent withasubtended visualangleofatleast15minutesasviewedfromacentral,positionwithintheprimaryoperating area.,PATTERNRECOGNITION-(1)Thenumberofalarmtilesandthematrixdensityshouldbekeptlow(amaximumof50tilespermatrixismggested).

(2)Tileswithinanannunciator panelmatrixshouldbegroupedbysubsystem,

function, orotherlogicalorganization.

OUTNFSERVICEALARMS-Cues forpromptrecognition ofanoutof.service annunciator shouldbedesignedintothesystem.BLANKTILES-Blank orunusedannunciator tilesshouldnotbeilluminated (exceptduringannunciator testing).

N/AYESNOCOMMENTS8.3.3.4VISUALTILELEGENDS~.UNAMBIGUOUS

-Annunciator visualtilelegendsshouldbespecificandunambiguous.

Wordingshouldbeinconcise,shortmessages.

b.SINGULARITY

-Alarmswhichrefertheoperatortoanother,moredetailedannunciator panellocatedoutsidetheprimaryoperating areashouldbeminimized.

A-6 ANNUNClATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19836.3,3.4VISUALTILELEGENDS(Cont'd)c.SPECIFICITY

-Tilelegendsshouldaddressspecificconditions; forexample,donotuseonealarmforHIGH-LOW, TEMPFRATURE-PRESSURE.d.ABBREVIATIONS

-Abbreviations andacro-nymsshouldbeconsistent withthoseusedelsewhere inthecontrolroom.N/AYESNOCOMMENTS6.3.3.5VISUALTILEREADABILITY a.DISTANCE-The operatorshouldbeabletoreadalltheannunciator tilesfromthepositionattheworkstationwheretheannunciator acknowledge controlislocated.(1)Letterheightshouldsubtendaminimumvisualangleof15minutes,or.004xviewingdistance.

Thepreferred visualangleis20minutes,or.006xviewingdlstanceo (2)Letterheightshouldbeidentical foralltiles,basedonthemaximumviewingdistance.

Separatecalculations shouldbemadeforstand.upandsitdownworkstations.

b.TYPESTYLE-The sizeandstyleoflettering shouldmeetthefollowing:

(1)Typestylesshouldbesimple.(2)Typestylesshouldbeconsistent onallvisualtiles.(3)Onlyupper-case typeshouldbeusedonvisualtiles,c.LEGENDCONTRAST-Legends shouldpro-videhighcontrastwiththetilebackground.

(1)Legendsshouldbeengraved.

(2)Legendsshouldbedarklettering onalightbackground.

d.LETTERDIMENSIONS ANDSPACING-(1)Stroke.width.to-cnaracter-height ratioshouldbebetween1:6and1:8.(2)Letterwidth.to-height ratioshouldbebetween1:1and3:5.(3)Numeralwidthto.height ratioshouldbe3:5.A-7 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19836.3.3.5VISUALTILEREADABILITY (Cont'd)d.LETTERDIMENSIONS ANDSPACING-(Cont'd)(4)Minimumspacebetweencharacters shouldbeonestrokewidth.(5)Minimumspacebetweenwordsshouldbethewidthofonecharacter.

(6)Minimumspacebetweenlinesshouldbeone-halfthecharacter height.N/AYESNOCOMMENTS6.3.4a~>>>>b.:;C.d..1CONTROLS(SeeExhibit6.35.)SILENCE(1)Eachsetofoperatorresponsecontrolsshouldincludeasilencecontrol.(2)Itshould'bepossibletosilenceanauditoryalertsignalfromanysetofannunciator responsecontrolsintheprimaryoperating area.ACKNOWLEDGE (1)Acontrolshouldbeprovidedtoterminate theflashingofavisualtileandhaveitcontinueatsteadyillumination untilthealarmiscleared.(2)Acknowledgement shouldbepossibleonlyattheworkstationwherethealarmoriginated.

RESET(1)Ifanautomatic clearedalarmfeatureisnotprovided, acontrolshouldbepro.videdtoresetthesystemafteranalarmhascleared.(2)Theresetcontrolshouldsilenceanyaudiblesignalindicating clearance andshouldextinguish tileillumination.

(3)Theresetcontrolshouldbeeffective onlyattheworkstationfortheannunciator panelwherethealarminitiated.

TEST(1)Acontroltotesttheauditorysignalandflashingillumination ofalltilesinapanelshouldbeprovided.

(2)Periodictestingofannunciators shouldberequiredandcontrolled byadministrative procedure.

A-8 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983.6.3.4.2CONTROLSETDESIGNa.b.C.6.3.4.3ANNUNCIATOR RESPONSEPROCEDURES POSITIONING OFREPETITIVE GROUPS-Repetitive groupsofannunciator controlsshouldhavethesamearrangement andrelativelocationatdifferent workstations.

Thisistofacilitate "blind"reaching.

CONTROLCODING-Annunciator responsecontrolsshouldbecodedforeasyrecognition, usingtechniques suchas:(1)Colorcoding;(2)colorshadingthegroupofannunciator

'controls; (3)demarcating thegroupofannunciator controls; or(4)shapecoding,particularly thesilencecontrol.(SeeExhibit6.3.5,Example2.)NONDEFEATABLE CONTROLS-Annunci~atorcontroldesignsshouldnotallowtheoperatortodefeatthecontrol.Forexample,somepushbuttons usedforannunciator silencing andacknowledgement canbehelddownbyinserting acoinintheringaroundthe-pushbutton.

Thisundesirable designfeatureshouldbeeliminated.

K/AYESKOCOMMENTSa.AVAILABILITY

-Annunciator responsepro.ceduresshouldbeavailable inthecontrolroom.INDEXING-Annunciator responseprocedures shouldbeindexedbypanelidentification andannunciator tilecoordinates.

6.5.1.6COLORCODINGa.b.~REDUNDANCY-In allapplications ofcolorcoding,colorshouldprovideredundant information.

Thatis,thepertinent information shouldbeavailable fromsomeothercueinadditiontocolor,NUMBEROFCOLORS(1)Thenumberofcolorsusedforcodingshouldbekepttotheminimumneededforprovidngsufficient information.

(2)Thenumberofcolorsusedforcodingshouldnotexceed11.A-9 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19838.5,1.6COLORCODING(Cont'd)c.MEANINGOFCOLORS(I)Themeaningattachedtoaparticular colorshouldbenarrowlydefined.(2)Red,green,andamber(yellow)shouldbereservedforthefollowing uses:Red:unsafe,danger,immediate operatoractionrequired, oranindication thatacriticalparameter isoutoftolerance.

Green:safe,nooperatoractionrequired, oranindication thataparameter iswithintolerance.

Amber(yellow):

hazard(potentially un-safe),caution,attention

required, oranindication thatamarginalvalueorparameter exists.d.CONSISTENCY OFMEANING(1)Themeaningassignedtoparticular colorsshouldbeconsistent acrossallapplications withinthecontrolroom.(2)Themeaningofaparticular colorshouldremainthesamewhetherappliedtopanelsurfacesorprojected insignallightsoronCR,Ts.N/AYESNOCOMMENTS6.6.6.2DEMARCATIONb.C.USE-Lines ofdemarcation canbeusedto:(1)Enclosefunctionally relateddisplays.

{2)Enclosefunctionally relatedcontrols.

(3)Grouprelatedcontrolsanddisplays.

CONTRAST-Lines ofdemarcation shouldbevisuallydistinctive fromthepanelbackground.

PERMANENCE-Lines ofdemarcation shouldbepermanently attached.

ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983AUDITORYALERTSUBSYSTEM VISUALALARMSUBSYSTEM rOPERATORRESPONSESUBSYSTEM

~~;51i--."""1bExhibit6.3l.Annunciator warningayatern.,

ANNUNC1ATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983lCdenassesn ssceetn~$~A&antAsonsaarc LHHtcNaSsaaedede Iyft~~g~~~~4~idscarywealarsosnaceN nonsaooassseer MCSNon(san)VscssdAnssssKsecor TiltAccsrecson sorest(eysnsddormteesnnsssssnasew eormINUnssnnnl endncensssacc~racenndssraednanccnwcsonSlLSNCS"ControlIleonsnce (AnyMCSLate(seel AyennySsoKSCeeae.nKeenansonAKece"AC@HOWLS OQS"ControlAeowsta(OnlyecIICSLoeecnnNwAsrsssssitsalaseassetIIslaossne ceases.(ssstTiklternasnc Invnssnatad Iss0sedsaesc endAernedsacsan olesotnnnecesscessa+sear(ll Necssrnad toNormoIMeanIersonISssn~~~~~e

~(JsswssaAsses(dry SslnellorClearedANnssp~~~~qVsosdAnnssncsacar TileAetwtw~wSoecselelcerssne denalvssssnTriacolndscece"OwedANnss"nsssr-CarnndN~(OseyceMCSLacenonNwAnssssncsetor ecnn)NoMoleAssceesearVsssMaA4nnTSSlIAtSealsSoearlnAenssKntar CanclnSecLoaetsonl IKlioeMAccessory ANrcsianesendlsleaneeANvsosnTilessnNdendAnsnnsesecor eorm(slLSOSNOQQ~SessosneK Actsang+g~oaeeccssr Acean~Aecdsceceassdessn~Exhibit6.3.2.Annunciator systempreferred operational sequence.

A-12 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENTP-3.11Nay1983PIRSTPRIORITYALARMS~Plantshutdownlraectortrip,turbinetrip)~Radiation release~Plantconditions which,lfnotcorrected immediately, willresultinautomatic plantshutdownorradi~tionralaae.orwillrequitemanualplantshutdown.

SECONDPRIORITYALARMS~Technical

~ificetion violations whichifnotcorrected willrequireplantShutdown~Plantconditions which.Ifnotcorrected, meySaadtoplantshutdownorradiation releasesTk(ROPRIORITYALARMS~plantconditions reoresantina problemsie9'ystŽdaeredationI whicheffectplantooarability butwhichshouldnotleadtoplantshutdovm, radiation release.orviolation oftechnical xsecifications Exhibit6.33.ThreelevelannUnciator prioritization example.ecctnas'rsa corrteotaasissVISUALALARMSW<<&<<<<8'sita<<i~isa'aIst~Grwtsaior sISita<<otHtsai

~'st~OINISaOl<<IIRELATEDDISPLAYSgi>liaur~>ac'rtoartsau<<rsRli<<irttoarts~HlElRELATEDCDNTRQLSCIIExhibit6.M.Vistralalarmslocatedabovethcrelatedcontrolsanddisplays.

(FromSeminaraetai.,1979).A-13 ANNUNClATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19B3E'xample1SILENCEACKNOWLEDGE Example2::::::ANNUNCIATOR CONTROLS::::::

SILENCE.::.ACKRESETTESTRESETTESTExhibit6.35.Annunciator responsecontrols.

ColorSerialOr<<eleetrOn numberGeneralcolornameISCCNBS/rtunsett renotetron olcolor.centroidnameISCC4<<SSCentroidnumberlaboraviation)

Color123456789101112131415'l6171819202122whiteblackyellowpurOleoreneelightblueredbullOrevcreenpurplishpinkblueyellawieh pinkvioletoranceyellowpurplishredare<<nishyellowreddishbrownyellowcreenyellOwith brOwnreddishor<<nileOliveareen253257822184818011902651392471782620756255974011575126Whiteblackv.Y~.Pv.Ov.l.dv.Rey.YmedGyv.G<<,pPk<<,8<<,yPk<<.Vv.OY<<.oRv.aYa.rBrv.YGdecoyBrv.rOd,OIG2.5PB9.5/0.2NOdr3.3Y8.0/14.35.5P4.3/9,24,1YR5.5/1502.7P87.9I6,05,OR3.9/1544.4Y7.2/3.83.3GY5.4IO13.2G4.9/11.15BRP6.8/9.02.9PB4.1/104S.4R7.0/9.50.2P3.7/10.18.6YR7.3/15.27.3RP4.4/11,49.1Y8.2/12.00,3YR3.1/9.96.4GY6.8/11.2B,BYR3.l/5.094RS.4/14,5B.0GY2.2/3.6Exhibit6.57.Twentytwocolorso(maximumcontrast(tramKelly,1965).A-14 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983APPENDIXBDATAFORMS ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENAPPENDIX8DATAFORMSTP-3.11May1983TABLEOFCONTENTSBl-MEASUREMENT, DATAFORMSBl.lLinearMeasurements 81.2SoundMeasurements 81.3LightMeasurements 82-OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 83-OBSERVATION CHECKLIST 84-DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST 85-ANALYSISAIDS85.1LinearMeasurements Analysis85.2SoundMeasurementsAnalysis85.3LightMeasurements Analysis86-OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS87-OBSERVATION CHECKLIST ANALYSIS88-DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST ANALYSIS89-SAMPLEHEDREPORTFORM~Pae81.1-181.1-181.2-181.3-182-183-184-185'-185.1-185.2-185.3-186-187-188-189-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXBl.lMEASUREMENTS DATATP-3.11May19831.LINEARMEASUREMENTS (LABELING) 1.1Annunciator LightBox(ALB)SummaryLabels-6.3.3.1b(2).

a.Iftherearenosummarylabels,checkhere:b.Iftherearesummarylabels,measureandrecordinTablel.lbthefollowing information:

ITEMNO.1)2)3)4)5)6)ITEMDESCRIPTION Character heightCharacter widthand/ornumeralwidthCharacter strokewidth Character spacingWordspacingLinespacingTABLE1~lbITEMALB-ALB-ALB-ALB-ALB-ALB-ALB-2.3.4.6~1.2TileLabeling-6.3.3.5a(l) anda(2),and6.3.5.5d(1) throughd(6).a,MeasureandrecordinTable1.2athecharacter height(s) usedinthetiles.Ifmorethanonesizecharacter isused,recordtheheightforalloftherepresented heights.Alsomeasureandrecordthefarthestleftandfarthestrighttilefromitsassociated acknowledge stationforeachoftherepresented character heights(startattheleftmostacknowledge stationandnumberthestationsgoingclockwise aroundtheMCB).

APPENDIXBl.lMEASUREMENTS DATA~I'J~J1Nay19831.2(Cont.)TABLE1.2aSTA1STA2STA3STA4STA5CHARHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTb.Foreachacknowledge stationinthetableabove,measureandrecordinTable1.2btheheightfromthefloorforthefarthestleftandfarthestrighttilefromthissametable.TABLE1.2bTILEHEIGHTFROMFLOORCHARHTSTA1STA2STA3STA4STA5Bl.l-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB1.1MEASUREMENTS DATATP-3.11May19B3c.Measureandrecordthefollowing foreachofthedifferent character heightsfroma,above:TABLE1.2cCHAR/NUMHT(ref)WIDTHSTROKEWIDTHCHARSPACINGWORDSPACINGLINESPACING1.3DataReduction andAnalysis.

Fordatareduction andanalysis, obtaintheappropriate analysisaidsfromAppendixB5(ref.B5.1).B1.1-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB1.2MEASUREMENTS DATA'P-3.11Hay19832.SOUNDMEASUREMENTS (AUDIBLESIGNALS)2.1Annunciator AudibleAlarms-6.3.2.1a.

MeasurethesoundlevelindB(A)foreachannunciator audiblealarmateachofthefollowing operatorpositions:

TABLE2ALARMLOCATIONMCBSAFETYSYSTEMSPOS1POS2CONTTURBELECRADMONOP'SGENDISTCONSOLEDESK2.3.4,5.2.2DataReduction andAnalysis.

Fordatareduction andanalysis, obtaintheappropriate analysisaidsfromAppendixB5(ref.B5.2).B1~2-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB1.3MEASUREMENTS DATA3.LIGHTMEASUREMENTS (TILEFLASHCHARACTERISTICS)

-6.3.5b(l) and6.3.3.2b3.1UsingtheFlashComparator, measuretheflashrateoftilesinalarmandinclear,Recordtherates.AlarmFlashRate:ClearedFlashRate:3.2UsingtheFlashComparator, measuretheon-offratioforthealarmflashrateandclearedflashrate.On-OffRatio(Alarm):On-OffRatio(Cleared):

B3.1-1 ANNONCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983APPENOIX82OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS 1.Thefollowing arequestions concerning thegenerallayout,functional organization, andoperational considerations inyourcontrolroom.Hostofthequestions willrequireaYESorNOanswer,withsomeadditional information.

02.Whenyouhavecommentsorsuggestions, usethespaceprovidedbeloweachquestion.

If.youneedadditional room,usethebacksofthesheets.3.Ifyoudonotunderstand aquestion, pleaseaskthemonitorforclarification.

4.Pleaseanswerallofthequestions ascompletely aspossible.

5.Takeasmuchtimeasyouneedtocompletethequestionnaire.

6.Allofyouranswers,andyourbiographical information, willbekeptinthestrictest confidence andwillbeusedtoaidinthe'erformance ofthedetailedcontrolroomdesignreview.PLEASEBEGIN82-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERYIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE

'BIOGRAPHICAL DATA:Name:Age:Sex:Height:Weight:CurrentPosition/Title:

1.Doyouhaveacurrentreacto~operator's license'?

YESNO2.Amountoflicensedexperience atthisplant:3.Totalamountlicensedexperience:

4.Relatedexperience andamount(example:

operator-trainee, HodgeNPPUnit1,1yr.):5.'ducation:

a.Highestlevelattained:

beSpecialized Schoolsorcourses(list):6.Militaryexperience:

B2-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE l.Doyouhaveafirstoutannunciator panelwhereonlythetileassoc-iatedwiththereactortripeventilluminates andall'subsequent alarmsonthatpanelare"lockedout"?YESNO2.Doyou'knowofanyautomatic reactortripfunctions thatdonothaveaseparateannunciator tileonthefirstoutpanel(eithermissingorsharedwithotherfunctions)?

YESNO3.Aretheannunciator panelsinthecontrolroomidentified byalabelaboveeachpanel?YESNO4.Fromyourprimaryoperating area,canyoureadallannunciator panellabelswithaminimumofeffort?YESNO5.Istheannunciator systemprioritycodedbycolor,position, shape,orsymboliccodingofthetiles?YESNO6.Doesyourannunciator systemusecolorcoding?YESNO7.Aretheremorethanelevencolorsusedforcodingthepanels?YESNOB2-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE B.Isthereastandardmeaningattachedtothecolorsusedforcodingthepanels?YESNO9.Isthecolorredeverusedforacondition otherthanunsafe,danger,immediate operatoractionrequired, orasanindication thatacriticalparameter isoutoftolerance?

YESNO10.Isthecolorgreeneverusedforacondition otherthansafe,nooperatoractionrequired, orasanindication thataparameter iswithintolerance?

YESNO1'l..Isthecoloramber(yellow)everusedforacondition otherthanhazard(potentially unsafe),caution,attention required,orasanindication thatamarginalvalueorparameter exists?YESNO12.Doyouknowofanyunnecessary colorcodingontheannunciator panels?YESNO13.Doyouknowofanycolorsthatarenotusedconsistently acrossallapplications withinthecontrolroom,frompanel-to-panel orinsignallightsandonCRTs?YESNOB2-4 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 14.Areauditorysignalsprioritycodedbypulse,frequency change(warbling),

intensity, ordifferent frequencies fordifferent signals?YESNO15.Ifyouhaveseparatealarmhorns,canyoueasilyidentifytheworkstationorsystemwheretheauditorysignaloriginated?

YESNO16.Doyouhavedifferent alarmhornsforworkareasnotatthemaincontrolboard?YESNO17.Iftheauditoryalarmsignalhasonlyonesource,isthesoundcodedtodirectyoutodifferent workareas?YESNOII18.Doanyofthealarmhornsstartleorirritateyou?YESNO19.Ifyouhavedifferent alarmhorns,doanyofthemsoundtooloudortoosoftincomparison totheothersatyournormalworkstation?YESNO20.Doyouhaveasilencecontrolwitheachsetofresponsecontrolsinyourprimaryoperating area'?YESNOB2-5 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIX82OPERATORINTERVIEM/QUESTIONNAIRE 21.Isacontrolprovidedwhichterminates aflashingvisualtile,butallowsasteadyillumination untilthealarm'iscleared'YESNO22.Canyouacknowledge analarmfrommorethanoneresponsecontrolarea?YESNO23.Ifclearedalarmsdonotresetautomatically, doyouhaveacontroltoresetthemyou'rself?YESNO24.Doestheresetcontrolsilencetheauditorysignalaswellasextin-guishtheillumination?

YESNO25.Doestheresetcontroloperatefrommorethanoneresponsecontrolarea?YESNO26.Canyoudefeatanyoftheannunciator

controls, suchaslockingouttheaudiblealarmorlockingdowntheacknowledge control?YESNO27.Canyoutesttheauditoryandflashingillumination signalsofalltilsforeachpanel?YESNOB2-6 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEM/QUESTIONNAIRE 28.Isthereanadministrative procedure thatcontrolstheperiodictestingofallannunciators?

YESNO29.Arealltilesdarkonannunciator panelswhennoalarmisindicated?

YESNO30.Canyoueasilytellifatileisnormallyonforanextendeddura-tionduringnormaloperating conditions?

YESNO31.Areyouimmediately awareifanannunciator tileisoutofservice?YESNO32.Canyouimmediately determine whentheflasherofanalarmtilefails?YESNO33.Doyouknowofanyalarmsthatoccursofrequently thatyouconsiderthemanuisance?

YESNOB2-7 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983APPENDIX82OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 34.Doyouknowofanyalarmsthatdonotgiveyouampletimetorespondtoawarningcondition?

YESNO35.Whenresponding toanalarmtile,canyoureadilylocatethecontrolsanddisplaysrequiredforcorrective ordiagnostic action?YESNO36.Doyouhaveaccesstoannunciator responseprocedures inthecontrolroom?YESNO37.Doyouknowofanyalarmswhichrequireyoutoobtainadditional infor-mationfromasourceoutsideofthecontrolroomarea?YESNO38.Aretheretoomanyalarmswhichrequireadditional information frompanelsoutsideyouroperating area?YESNO82-8 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 39.Ifalarmsareusedthatrequireinformation outsidethecontrolroom,dotheyallowyouampletimetorespond'YESNO40.Arealarmsprovidedforsharedequipment inallcontrolrooms?YESNO4l.Isthereastatusdisplayorsignalprovidedforsharedequipment inallcontrolroomswhichindicates thattheequipment iscurrently beingoperated?

YESNO42.DoyouhaveanytileswithdualmessagessuchasHIGH-LOW?

YESNO43.Doesthemulti-input alarmhaveareflashcapability thatreflashesthevisualtileafteranauditoryalertevenifthefirstalarmhasnotbeencleared?YESNOB2-9 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENTP-3.11Nay19B3APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 44.Domulti-input annunciators provideyouwithanalarmprintout?

YESNO45.Doesthemulti-input alarmtyperhavesufficient speedtoprintthealarmdatafastenoughforyourneeds?YESNO46.Doesthealarmtypereverskiporlooseinformation, orgarble(mixup)theprinting?

YESNOB2-10 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB3OBSERYATIONS CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS l.Usingtheattachedchecklist, makeallthenotedobservations.

2.Recordallnecessary information inthecommentscolumntojustifyanN/AcheckandtodetailaNOcheck.3.InsurethatallcommentsforNOchecksincludecomponent, instrument, panel,equipment, etc.identification andlocationinformation.

4.InitiateHEDreportsonallNOchecksperthedirections contained inthechecklist analysisaids.83-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS.

1.Aseparatefirstoutpanelshouldbeprovidedforthereactorsystem-6.3.1.3a(1).

2.Aseparatefirstoutpanelisrecommended fortheturbine-generator systemthatisfunc-tionallysimilartothereactorsystempanel-6.3.1.3b.

3.Firstoutpanelsshouldbe,locatedabovetheirmainwork,.stations-6.3.1.3c.

.,4.Allfirstoutpanelsshouldconformtothegeneralauditoryandvisualitemsintherestofthischecklist

-6.3.1.3d.

5.Asmallnumber(2-4)oflevelsofprioritycodingareused-6.3.1.4a(l).

6.Prioritycodingofcolor,posi-tion,shape,orsymbolisusedfor.visualsignals-6.3.1.4b(1).

B3-2 ANNUNCIATORSYSTENAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.1"1Nayl983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS7.Auditorysignalprioritycodingmaybeused-6.3.1.4b(2).

8.Ifmorethanone,eachaudi-torysignalshouldsoundatapproxi-matelyequalloudnessatnormalwork.tations intheprimaryopera-tingarea-6.3.2.ld.

9.Anauditorysignalshouldcapturetheoperator's attention butshouldnotirritateorcauseastartledreaction-6.3.2.1c.

10.Separateauditorysignalsateachworkstationwithinthepri-maryoperating areaarerecom-mended-6D.2.1f.ll.Theoperatorshouldbeabletoidentifytheworkstationorareawheretheauditoryalertorigi-nated-6.3.2.lf.

12.Theauditorysignalshouldautomatically resetwhensilenced-6.3.2.le.

B3"3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS13.Whenanalarmclears(oriscleared)thereshouldbeadedi-cated,distinctaudiblesignalwithafiniteduration-6.3.1.5a.

14.Auditoryalertsignal(s),

ifadjustable, shouldbecontrolled byadministrative procedure-6.3.2.1b.

15.Thespecifictitle(s)inanALB'shouldvisuallyflashtoindicateanalarmcondition

-6.3.3.2a.

16.Incaseofflasherfailure,analarmingtileshouldilluminate andburnsteadily-6.3.3.2c.

17.Contrastbetweentilesshouldpresentnoproblemdiscriminating betweenalarming, steady-on, andsteady-off conditions

-63.3.2d.B3-4 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIZB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST N/AYESCOMMENTSTP-3.11May198318.Undernormal(nonalarmed) conditions noannunciator tilesshouldbeilluminated

-6.3.3.2e.

19.Ifatilemustbeonforanextendedperiodduringnormaloperations itshouldbedistinc-tivelycodedforpositiverecog-nitionduringthisperiod(seealso6.3.3.2f(2),

item2contheDocumentReview.Checklist)-

6.3.3.2f(1).

20.Clearedtilesshouldhaveeitheraspecialflashrate,areducedbrightness, oraspecialcolor-6.3.1.5b(l) throughb(3).21.Alltilesassociated withagivenacknowledge controlshouldbereadablewhenoperating thatcontrol-6.3.3.5a.

22.Character styleonalltilesshouldbesimple-63.3.5b(l).

23.Character styleshouldbeconsistent onalltiles-63.3.5b(2).

B3-5 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM,'PPENDIX B3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS24.Character styleshouldbeuppercase onalltiles-6.3.3.5b(3).

25.Tilelegendsshouldhavehighcontrastwiththetilebackground-6.3.3.5c.

26.Tilelegendsshouldbeengraved-6.3.3.5c(1).

27.Tilelegendsshouldbedarkandopaqueonalightandtrans-lucentbackground

-6.3.3.5c(2).

28.Tilelegendsshouldbespecific, unambiguous, concise,andshort-6.3.3.4a.

29.Tilelegendsshouldaddressspecificconditions, HIGHTEMP,orLOWPRESS,notHIGH-LOWTEMP-PRESS

-6.33.4c.B3-6 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB3-OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11Nay1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS30.Abbreviations andacronymsinlegendsshouldbeconsistent withthoseinotherlabelinginthecon-trolroom-6.3.3.4d.

31.Tilesshouldbeorganized asamatrixwithineachALB-6.3.3.3a.

32.Theverticalandhorizontal axesoftheALBsshouldbealpha-numerically labeledfortiledesig-nationcoordinates

-6.3.3.3c(l).

33.Coordinate designators arepreferred attheleftandtopsidesoftheALBs-6.3.3.3c(2).34.Character heightforthecoordinate labelsshouldbethesameheightasthoseusedintilelegends-63.3.3c(3).

35.ThenumberoftilesinanALBshouldbekeptlow,withamaxi-mumof50tilesperALBsuggested

-63.3.3d(1).

B3-7 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM,APPENDIX83.OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST N/AYESNOCOMMENTSTP-3.11May198336.Cuesforpromptrecognition ofanout-of-service annunciator shouldbedesignedintothesystem-6.33.3e.37.Blankorunusedtilesshouldnotbeilluminated exceptduringannunciator testing-6.3.3.3f.

,38.Demarcation linesmaybeusedtoenclosefunctionally

'elatedtitles-6.6.6.2a(l).

,.39.Demarcation linesmaybeusedtogrouptileswiththeirrelatedcontrolsand/ordisplays-6.6.6.2a(l) througha(3).40.Ifused,demarcation linesshouldbevisuallydistinctive fromthepanelbackground

-6.6.6.2b.

41.Ifused,demarcation linesshouldbepermanently attached-6.6.6.2c.

83-8 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS42.ALBsshouldbelocatedabovethecontrolsanddisplaysrequiredforcorrective ordiagnostic actionwhentheyalarm-6.3.3.la.

43.EachALBshouldbeidentified byalabeldirectlyaboveit-6.3.3.lb(1).44.Eachsetofannunciator controlsshouldincludeasilencecontrol-6.3.4.1a(1).

45.Anacknowledge controlshouldbeprovidedthatterminates theflashingandcausesthetiletocontinuously illuminate untilithascleared-6.3.4.lb(1).

46.Ifanautomatic clearedalarmfeatureisnotprovided, acontrolshouldbeprovidedtoresetthesystemafteranalarmhascleared-6.3.4.1c(1).

B3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS47.Acontroltotesttheauditoryalarmandtheflashingillumination ofalltilesinapanel(i.e.,inoneormoreALBs)shouldbeprovided-6.>.4.1d(1).

48.Repetitive groupsofannun-ciatorcontrolsshouldhavethesamearrangement andrelativelocationatdifferent workstations-6.3.4.2a.

49.Annunciator controlsshouldbe'codeddifferently thanotherpanelcontrolseitherbycolor,demarca-'tion,orshape-6.3.4.2b(1) throughb(4).50.Shapecodingispreferred forthesilencecontrol-6.3.4.2b(4).

51.Annunciator controldesignsshouldnotallowtheoperatortodefeatthecontroloperation suchasinserting acoinintoacontrolguardring<<6.3.4.2c.

52.Annunciator responseproce-duresshouldbeavailable inthecontrolroom-6.3.4.3a.

B3-10 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB4DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS Collectthefollowing documents andreviewthemfortheinformation contained intheattachedchecklist:

l.Administrative Procedures concerning annunciators 2.Annunciator ResponseProcedures 3.Resultsfromthefollowing taskreports:a.Convention Surveyb.SystemFunctionTaskAnalysis'c.LabelingSurvey4.InsurethatallcommentsforNOchecksincludecomponent, instrument, panel,equipment, etc.identification andlocationinformation.

5.InitiateHEDreportsonallNOchecksperthedirections contained inthechecklistanalysisaids.B4-I ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENAPPENDIXB4DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST N/AYESNOCOMMENTSTP-3.11May1983l.ANNUNCIATOR RESPONSEPROCEDURES a.Responseprocedures shouldbeindexedbypanelI.D.andtilecoordinates

-6.>.4.3bb.Thereshouldbenoalarmsthatrequiretheoperatortodirectanauxiliary operatoroutsidethecon-trolroomtoobtainmorespecificinformation

-6.3.1.2b(1).

c.Annunciators withinputsfrom~.morethanoneplantparameter set-pointshouldbeavoided(multi-inputalarmsthatsummarize

..single-input alarmselsewhere inthecontrolroomareanexcep-tion)-63.1.2c(l) 2.PLANTADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES a.Periodictestingofannunci-atorsshouldberequiredandcon-trolledbyadministrative pro-cedures-66.4.ld(2).

b.Ifaudiblealarmintensity isoperator-adjustable, itshouldbecontrolled byadministrative procedures

-6.3.2.1b.

B4-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIX84DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTSPLANTADMINPROCESS(cont)c.Whenannunciator tilesmustbeonforanextendedperiodduringnormaloperations, itshouldbecontrolled byadministrative pro-cedures(seealso6.3.3.2f(1),

item19ontheObservations Check-list)-6.5.3.2f(2).

CONVENTIONS TASKREPORTa.Colormeaningsshouldnotbetheonlymeansforidentifying

~pertinent information, thatis,allcolorcodingusedshouldberedundant information

-6.5.1.6a.

b.Thenumberofcolorsusedforcodingshouldbekepttothemini-mumneededtoprovidesufficient information andshouldnotexceed11-6.5.1.6b(1) andb(2).c.Colormeaningsshouldbenarrowlydefined-6.5.1.6c(1).,

d.Redshouldmeanunsafe,danger,immediate operatoractionrequired, oranindication thatacriticalparameter isoutoftoler-ance-6.5.1.6c(2).

Itisimportant tonotethatinonesense,astrictinterpretation of84-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB4DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTSCONVENTIONS TR(Cont)thisstatement wouldmeanthatastandard, andbroadlyappliedconvention inthenuclearindustrywasincorrect.

However,keepinmindthatflowingelectricity (closedbreakers),

flowingwaterorsteam(runningpumpsandopen'alves),

andanactivereactorcanbeconsidered inherently lesssafethanashutofforshutdowncondi"ion.e.Greenshouldmeansafe,shutoff,shutdown,nooperatoractionrequired, oranindication thata'parameter iswithintolerance-6.5.1.6c(2).

f.Amberoryellowshouldmeanahazard,potentially unsafe,caution,attention

required, oranindication thatamarginalvalueor.parameter exists-6.5.1.6c(2).

g.Meaningsassignedtoapartic-ularcolorshouldbeconsistent acrossallcontrolroomappli-cationsregardless ofwhetheritisoriapanelsurface,inindicator lightsorinCRTs-6.5.1.6d(l) and(2).h.Abbreviations andacronymsshouldbeconsistent acrosscontrolroomapplications

-6.3.>.4d.

B4"4 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENOIXB4DOCUHENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST TP-3.11Hay1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS4.SFTATASKREPORTa,Theannunciator warningsys-temshouldbedesignedasthepri-maryalertinginterface withtheoperatorforout-of-tolerance con-ditions.Itshouldconsistofthreemajorsubsystems:

auditoryalert,visualalarm,andoperatorresponse.

Thesethreesubsystems shouidfunctiontoprovideapre-feredoperational sequenceforannunciator warnings-6.3.1.1.b.Visualalarmtilesshouldbegroupedbyfunction, system,sub-system,orotherlogicalorgani-zationwithinALBs-6.3.3.3bandd',2).c.Prioritization ofannunciators shouldbebasedonacontinumofimportance,

severity, orneedforoperatoractioninoneormoredimensions suchas,thelikelihood ofareactortriporthelikelihood ofareleaseofradiation-6.3.1.4a(2).

d.Tilelegendsshouldaddressspecificconditions ratherthanarangeofconditions and/orparam-eters.Asanexample,separatetilesshouldbeusedtoindicatetemperature-low, temperature-high,pressure-low, andpressure-high,ratherthanasingletilewiththelegendHIGH-LOWTEMP-PRESS-6.3.34c.B4-5 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983APPENDIX85.1MEASUREMENTS ANALYSIS11.LINEARMEASUREMENTS (LABELING) 1.1ALBSummaryLabels-6.3.3.l.b(2) a.'Iftherearenosummarylabels,checkN/Aforcriterion 6.3.3.l.b(2) inAppendixA.b.Iftherearesummarylabels,calculate thevisualangelsforeachlabelfortheoperatorpositions listedinTablel.lbTablel.lbSAFETYSYSTEMSIDENTPOS1POS2MCBREACTURBELECRADMONOP'SCONTGENDISTCONSOLEDESK2,3.5.7.Calculations (useextrasheets,asneeded):B5.1-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIX85.lMEASUREMENTS ANALYSISTP-3.11Nay1983c.IfallvisualanglesinTable1.1bare15minutesofarcorgreater,checkYESforcriterion 6.3.3.1b(2) inAppendixA.d.IftherearevisualanglesinTablel.lblessthan15minuesofarc,recordonanHEDreportformtheposition(s) andlabel(s)wherethisisso.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.1B5.1.1 indatacollection description.

Forcriterion 6.3.3.1b'(2) inAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDreportnumberandthecodenumber,TP-3.1B5.1.1 intheCOMMENTScolumn1.2TileLabels-6.3.3.5a(1) andd(1)throughd(6).a.Calculate thevisualanglesforeachcharacter heightatitsfarthestleftandfarthestrightlocationforeachworkstation inTable1.2a,below.TABLE1.2aALBNO/STA1STA2STA3STA4STA5CHARHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTCalculations (useextrasheets,asrequired):

85.1-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENAPPENDIXB5.1MEASUREMENTS ANALYSISTP-3.11May1983b.IfallvisualanglesinTable1.2aare15minutesofarcorgreater,checkYESforcriterion 6.3.3.5a(l) inAppendixA.c.IfanyvisualanglesinTable1.2aarelessthan15minutesofarc,recordonanHEDreportformtheposition(s) andtilelegend(s) wherethisisso.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.1B5,1.2 inthedatacollection description.

Forcriterion 6.3'.5a(1)inAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDreportnumberandthecodenumber,TP-3.1B5.1.2, intheCOMMENTScolumn.d.Comparethecharacter dimensions andlegendmeasurements foreachcharacter heightrecordedwithcriteria6.3.3.5d(1) throughd(6).e.Ifallcharacterheightsandlegendsmeetthecriteria, checktheYEScolumnforthesecriteriainAppendixA.f.Ifanycharacter dimensions orlegendmeasurements failtomeetthecriteria, recordonanHEDreportformthetilecoordinates, character heightimplicated, andadescri'ption ofthefailure.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.1B5.1.2in'thedatacollection description..Forcriteria6.3.3.5d(1) throughd(6)inAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDreportnumberandthecodenumberTP-3.1B5.1

~2,intheCOMMENTScolumn.B5.1-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB5.2MEASUREMENTS ANALYSISTP-3.11May19832.SOUNDMEASUREMENTS (AUDIBLESIGNALS)2.1Annunciator AudibleAlarms-6.3.2.la.a.Obtaintheaverage.ambientnoiselevelindb(A)fromtheAmbientNoiseSurveyTaskReport(TR-1.6)and'record below:Averagenoiselevel:db(A)b.Baseduponthebelowadjustment factors,reduceeachmeasuredannunciator alarmlevelandrecordinTable2.1b.ABSOLUTEDIFFERENCE BETWEENMEASUREDLEVEL(Lm)ANDAVERAGENOISELEVELLn5678910ll12131415SUBTRACTTHISAMOUNTFROMMEASUREDLEVEL(Lm)ANDANDRECORDINTABLE2.lb2.21.71.31.0.8.6.4.3.3.2.2.1TABLE2.1bALARMLOCATIONMCBSAFETYSYSTEMSPOS1POS2CONTTURBELECRADMONOP'SGENDISTCONSOLEDESK2.3.4.5.85.2-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB5.2MEASuREMENT ANALYSISTP-3.11May1983c.ComparealladjusteddB(A)levelsinTable2.1btotheaveragenoiselevel.d.Ifalladjustedaudiblealarmlevelsareatleast10dB(A)abovetheaveragenoiselevelchecktheYEScolumnforcriterion 6.3.2.1ainAppendixADe.Ifanyadjustedalarmlevelsarelessthan10dB(A)abovetheaveragenoiselevel,recordeachoccurance onanHEDreportform.Include"the codenumberTP3.lB5.2.1 inthedatacollection description.Forcriterion 6.3.2.1ainAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDreportnumberandthecodenumber,TP3.1B5.2.1 intheCOMMENTScolumn.B5.2-2 AxeuxCIATOR SYSTD1APPENDIX85.3MEASUREMENT ANALYSISTP-3.11May19833.LIGHTMEASUREMENTS (TILEFLASHCHARACTERISTICS) 3.1AlarmedFlashCharacteristics

-6.3.3.2b.

a.Fromtherecordeddata,determine ifthealarmedflashrateisbetween3to5flashespersecondandthattheon-offratioisapproximately 1:1.b.Ifbothparameters meetthecriteria, checktheYEScolumnforcriterion 6.3.3.2binAppendixA.c.Ifeitherparameter failstomeetthecriteria, recordthediscrepancy onanHEDreportform.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.185.3.1 inthedatacollection description.

Forcriterion 6,3.3.2bin'Appendix AchecktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDnumberandthecodenumber,TP-3.185.3.1, intheCOMMENTScolumn.3.2ClearedFlashRate-6.3.1.5b(1).

a.Fromtherecordeddata,determine iftheclearedflashrateisapproximately doubleorQthealarmedflashrate.b.Iftheclearedflashratepassesthecriterion, checktheYEScolumnforcriteria6.3.1.5b(l) inAppendixA.c.Iftheclearedflashratefailstomeetthecriterion, recordthediscrepancy onanHEDreportform.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.185.3.2 inthedatacollection discription.

Forcriterion 6.3.1.5b(1) inAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDnumberandthecodenumber,TP-3.185.3.2, intheCOMMENTScolumn.85.3-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB6OPERATORINTERYIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSISTP-3.11Nay1983l.GENERALa.Reviewallquestionnaires forcompleteness ofbiographical information andquestionresponses.

b.Deleteincomplete andunusablequestionnaires fromthedatabase.Ifrequiredbycontract, re-schedule thesequestion-nairesforcorrection/completeness.

c.Whenthedatabaseassemblyiscompleteperformtheanaylsis, below.(2.BIOGRAPHICAL DATAa.Assemblebiographical dataanddetermine rangesanddistribu-tionsforallrelevantdimensions.

b.Usingappropriate statistics, determine thedistribution (oritsapproximation)forthisdata.3.RESPONSEDATAa.Summarize allresponses anddetermine percentfrequency responseforeachnegativeanswer.b.Foreachnegativeanswer,initiatePreliminar'y HEDs(PHEDs)fordiscrepancy" review.Recordfrequency'data, responsequestionnumberanddatacollection codenumberoneachPHED.Codenumbersaredeveloped asfollows:(SeeList3bforcriteria}

Example;TaskPlanNumberAppendixTP-3.1B6.10 questionNumberc.SubmitallPHEDstoyourimmediate supervisor.

d.Subsequent verification, validation anddisposition ofallPHEDswillbeconducted perTP-10.1(HEDReviewProcedure).

B6-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIX86'PERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSISTP-3.11Nay19831,6.3.1.3a(3) 2.6.3.1.3a{2) 3~6.3.3.1b(1) 4,6.3.3.1b(2) 5.6.3.1.4b(1)

LIST3b20.6.3.4.1a(1)

&(2)21.6.3.4.1b(1) 22.6.3.4.1b(2) 23.6.3.4.1c(l)

,24.6.3.4.1c(2) 40.6.3.1.2d(l)41.6.3.1.2d(2)42.6.3.3.4c43.6.3.1.2c(3) 44.6.3.1.2c(2) 6.6.5.1.6b(l) 7.6.5.1,6b(2) 8.6.5,1.6c(l) 9~6.5.1.6c(2) 10.6.5.1.6G(2) 11.6.5.1.6G(2) 12.6.5.1.6b(1) 13.6.5.1.6d(1)&(2) 14.6.3.1.4b(2)&

6.3.2.2b15.6.3.2.1f16.6.3.2.2a(1) 17.6.3.2.2a(2) 18.6.3.*2.lc 19.6.3.2.1d25.26.27.28.24.30.31.32.33.34.35.36.37.38.39.6.3.4.1c(3) 6.3.4.2c6.3.4.1d(1) 6.3.4.ld(2) 6.3.3.2e6.3.3.2f6.3.3.3e6.3.3.2c6.3'.2a{1)6.3.1.2a(2) 6,3.3.la6.3.4.3a6.3.1.2b(1) 6.3.3.4b6.3.1.2b(2) 45.6.3.1.2c(2) 46.6.3.1.2c(2) 86-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM'PPENDIXB7OBSERVATION CHECKLIST ANALYSISTP-3.11May19831.Foreach.checklist itemcheckedNO,initiateanHEDreport.EntertheHEDreportnumberintheCOMMENTScolumnofthechecklist forthatitem.Includeallnecessary information ontheHEDreportconcerning identification ofthediscrepancy andthecriteria(checklist item)notmet.2.'nterthefollowing codenumberinthedatacollection description:

TP-3.1B3.n Checklist ItemNumber3.Findtheappropriate criterion orcriteriainAppendixAfromthereference numberinthechecklist item.ChecktheNOcolumnandentertheHEDnumberandthedatacollection codenumberintheCOMMENTScolumnforthatcriterion orcriteria.

87-1 IdANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIX88DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST ANALYSISTP-3.11Nay19831.Foreachchecklist itemcheckedNO,initiateanHEDreport.EntertheHEDreportnumberintheCOMMENTScolumnofthechecklist forthatitem.,Includeallnecessary information ontheHEDreportconcerning identification ofthediscrepancy andthecriteria.(checklist item)notmet.2.Enterthefollowing codenumberinthedatacollection description:

TP-3.184.n Checklist ItemNumber3.Findtheappropriate criterion orcriteriainAppendixAfromthereference numberinthechecklist item.ChecktheNOcolumnandentertheHEDnumberandthedatacollection codenumberintheCOMMENTScolumnforthatcriterion orcriteria.

88-1 APPENDIXB9HUMANENGINEERING DISCREPANCY (HED)REPORTOR16IHATOR:

VALIDATED SY:PLANT/UN!

T~)HEDTITLE:b)ITEHSIHVOLVED:

C)PROBLEHDESCRIPTIOH:

d)DATACOLLECTIOH DESCRIPTION CODEHUHBER:e)SPECIFICHUHAkERROR(S):

B9-I APPENDIX89HEDREPORT(CONTINUED)

TlANT/VNI THEDHO.:f)SUGGESTED SACKFlT;g)REVlEHAHDDlSPOS1T10H:

89-2 0

ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983APPENDIXCCRITERIAMATRIX ANNONCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.1IMay1983CRITERIA~

'ATRIXCriteriaDistributed AcrossDataCollection Methods.Notes:1.Thefollowing codesapplytothematrixcolumns:M-Measurement (instruments and/ormeasuring devicesrequired) 0-Observations (observation notestaken)I-Interview/guestionnaire (generally astructured interview unlessotherwise specified) 0-DocumentReview(documentation reviewtoincludeengineering

drawings, CMDs,etc.)A-AuditoryCriteriaV-VisualCriteriaC-ControlsCriteria(physical characteristics)

P-PhysicalArrangement/Location CriteriaF-Functional Criteria(usuallyrequiressomeoperational dataforverification) 2.Datasourceslistedaresuggested.

Alternatives shouldbeusedwhenthoselistedarenotavailable orarenotadequate.

ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983CRITERIAMATRIXCRITERIANUREG--0700 CrithB-'.3.1.1 6.3.1.2a(1) a(2)b(1)b(2)c(1)c(2)c(3)d(1)d(2)DATACOLLECTION METHODSXXXXXXXXXXXSUGGESTED DATASOURCESSFTARptOpsOpsOps,AnnRespProcsOpsAnnRespProcsOpsOpsOpsOpsREMARKSalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)6.3.1.3a(1) a(2)a(3)bcd6.3.1.4a(1) a(2)b(1)b(2)6.3.1.5ab(1)b(2)b(3)6.3.2.1a6.3.2.2a(1) a(2)b6.3.3.1ab{1)b(2)c(1)c(2)c(3)PFPFPFPFPFPFPFPFFFPFFFXN/AXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXN/AN/AN/APnlOpsOpsPnlPnlAllPnlPnl,SFTARptPnlPnlPnlPnl.PnlPnlCRCR,AdminProcsCR,OpsCR,OpsCRCR,OpsOpsOpsOpsPnlPnlCRseetextpara.4.2aalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)inTP-1~8-(Maint)inTP-1.8(Maint)inTP-1.8(Maint)C-2 ANNuNCIATOR SYSTENCRITERIAMATRIXTP-3.1IMay19B3CRITERIADATACOLLECTION NUREG--0700 CritMETHODS'UGGESTED DATASOURCESREMARKS6.3.3.28bcdef(>)f(2)6.3.3.3abc(I)c(2)c(3)d(I)d(2)'fFFFPPFPFPFPPFPPPPPFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXPnlPnl,Pnl,PnlPnl,Pnl,CompSpecOpsOpsOpsAdminProcsPnlSFTARptPnlPnlPnlPnlSFTARptOpsPnlalsoinTP-9.1{SFTA)alsoinTP-6.1(Labels)alsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)6.3.3.4abcd6.3.3.5a(I)a(2)b(I)b(2)b(3)cc(I)c(2)d{I)d(2)d(3)d(4)d(5)d(6)6.3.4.1a(1) a(2)b(I)b(2)c(I)c(2)c(3)PPFPFPPPFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPnl,OpsPnl,Pnl,PnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnl,OpsPnl,OpsPnl,OpsOps5FTAOps,SFTARptConvRptOpsOpsOpsalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)alsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)C-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983CRITERIAMATRIXCRITERIANUREG--0700 CritDATACOLLECTION METHODSSUGGESTED DATASOURCESREMARKS6.3.4.1d(1)

Fd(2)FXXPnl,OpsXOps,AdminProcs6.3.4.2ab(1)b(2)b(3)b(4)cXXXXXXXPnlPnl,ConvRptPnl,ConvRptPnl,ConvRptPnl,ConvRptPnl,OpsalsoinTP-8.1(Conv)alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)6.3.4.3abXXXCR,Ops,SFTARptXAnnRespProcsalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)6.5.1.6ab(1)b(2)c(1)c(2)d(1)d(2)XXXXXXXXXXXXXConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptalsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)(Conv)(Conv)(Conv)(Conv)(Conv)6.6.6.2aFbVCcPPnl,Ops,SFTARptPnlPnlalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)alsoinTP-6.1(Labels)alsoinTP-6,1(Labels)

ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983~~APPENDIXDTASKPLANCRITIQUE

~\

ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXDTASKPLANCRITIQUEINSTRUCTIONS 1.AttachacopyofSection,4,0.2.Fillintherequiredinformation andanswerallquestions.

3.ExplainallNOanswersindetail.4.Whencomplete, turnintoyourimmediate supervisor.

1.NameofRespondent:

2.NameofPlant:3.DateofSurvey:4.Wereallofthecriteriacorrectandappropriateforthistask(donotexplaincriteriathatwereN/AbecauseSystem/CR didnothavethatdesignfeature)?

YESNO5.Didthetaskplaninstructions presenttheeasiestandbestmethodology forperforming theassessment?

YESNO6.Werethedatacollection formsadequate?

YESNO