ML17326A118
| ML17326A118 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 09/10/1999 |
| From: | INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17326A117 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9909150207 | |
| Download: ML17326A118 (31) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT2A TO C0999-02 TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS PAGES MARKEDTO SHOW PROPOSED CHANGES REVISED PAGES UNIT 1 3/4 4-18 3/4 4-19 3/4 4-20 3/4 11-3 9909150207 9909i0 PDR ADQCK 050003i5l P
~ 1 4
~
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM QHEJvfl')TRY.
DI 3.4.7 The Reactor Coolant System Chemistry shall be maintained within the limits specified in Table 3.4-1.
MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4 a.,
With any one or more chemistry parameter in excess of its Steady State Limitbut within its Transient Limit, restore the Parameter to within its Steady State Limitwithin 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBYwithin the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
b.
With any one or more chemistry parameter in excess of its Transient Limit, be in at least HOT STANDBYwithin 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
At all other times With the concentration of either chloride or fluoride in the Reactor Coolant System in excess of its Steady State Limitfor more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or in excess of its Transient Limit, reduce the pressurizer pressure to 5 500 psig, ifapplicable, and perform an analysis to determine the effects of the out-of-limitcondition on the structural integrity of the Reactor Coolant System; determine that the Reactor Coolant System remains acceptable for continued operations prior to increasing the pressurizer prcssure above 500 psig or prior to proceeding to MODE 4.
S RV ILLA R
R T
4.4.7 The Reactor Coolant System chemistry shall be determined to be within the limits by analysis of those parameters at the frequencies specified in Table 4.4-3. PeifFirniWec:.'of;::this::fnirveillFiiYii';:,is.;not;:."xeqif'ir'ed
- when::tite.".reactoxiis:"'.dhcled'::~it'h.n'o".";fore'ed:,.ctiKculatk'n.
%~WVAV.'AW.CAW. Ki4iFp, 'W.'.'
" AV'::.
4Y
~
.Y
~ A Y
COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT1 Page 3/4 4-18
~
~
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM E '~4-Y TE I
Y I
IT STEADY STATE TRANSIENT CHLORIDE FLUORIDE 6 0.15 ppm 5 0.15 ppm DISSOLVED OXYGEN+
5 0.10 ppm>
5 1.00 ppm-5 1.50 ppm 5 1.50 ppm
- Limitsnot applicable withT,, S 250'F.
COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT1 Page 3/4 4-19
~ I 3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM XhBRM LA T YST I T-VI R
IREM T
DISSOLVED OXYGEN CHLORIDE FLUORIDE u
rAt."gaea'st:::,'0Nce';pk 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> so.cowouo 'ouosros so G.: )As A'.:::,IseRYt o7tee, jar 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />
,SO"'O'~
'..'hOX
'sir:::i@i oriso';p'oi 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />
- Notrequired with T 5 250'F.
hug COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNITI Page 3/4 4-20
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVEEFFLUENTS R
3.1 1.2.2 The quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas storage tank shall be limited to 43,800 curies noble gas (considered as Xe-133).
+tel With the quantity of radioactive material in any gas storage tank exceeding the above limit, without delay suspend all additions of radioactive material to the tank and within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> reduce the tank contents to within the limit.
b.
The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
V 4.1 1.2.2 The quantity of radioactive material contained in each gas storage tank shall be determined to be.
within the above limit at least once per 7 days whenever radioactive materials are added to the tank and at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> during primary coolant system degassing operations-by COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT1 Page 3/4 11-3 AMENDMENT69, ~, m, 189
/
~ +
ATTACI-IMENT2B TO C0999-02 TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS PAGES, MARKEDTO SHOW PROPOSED CHANGES REVISED PAGES UNIT2 3/4 4-17 3/4 4-18 3/4 11-3
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM
~HE ~ITRY, D
I F
P TI 3.4.7 The Reactor Coolant System chemistry shall be maintained within the limits specified in Table 3AI.
I B I:
At all times.
MODES1,2,3 and4 With any one or more chemistry parameter in excess of its Steady State Limit but within its Transient Limit, restore the Parameter to within its Steady State Limit within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
With any one or more chemistry parameter in excess of its Transient Limit, be in at least HOT STANDBYwithin 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
At all other times With the concentration of either chloride or fluoride in the Reactor Coolant System in excess of its Steady State Limit for more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or in excess of its Transient Limit, reduce the pressurizer pressure to s 500 psig, ifapplicable, and perform an engineering evaluation to determine the effects of the out-of-limit condition on the structural integrity of the Reactor Coolant System; determine that the Reactor Coolant System remains acceptable for continued operation prior to increasing the pressurizer pressure above 500 psig or prior to proceeding to MODE 4.
4.4.7 The Reactor Coolant System chemistry shall be determined to be within the limits by analysis of those parameters at the frequencies specified in Table 4.4-3.p:,Per'for'man'cK:,'of~':th'assur'veilcan'ce.".'.i'::,'not":riguired DIP(A 'W QV 'IV(PA'WP(J/AV'W W,g(V'g&~XQVA~AV~hi'~~/4 xiii':.ttt'i'::reactor;::,:ls:,:defueled,:.pjjA:,:ne.:::forced.:"cjrculattont COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT2 Page 3/4 4-17
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION ANDSURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM
~BI~F~4-REA OR L
T SYS HE I
RY LI IT PAR METE DISSOLVED OXYGEN*
CHLORIDE FLUORIDE EADYST TELI IT 5 0.10 ppm 5 0.15 ppm 6 0.15 ppm 6 1.00 ppm S 1.50 ppm 5 1.50 ppm
- Limitsnot applicable with T,, S 250'F.
COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT2 Page 3/4 4-18
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVEEFFLUENTS T
ET S
3.11.2.2 The quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas storage tank shall be limited to 43,800 curies noble gas (considered as Xe-133).
a.
With the quantity of radioactive material in any gas storage tank exceeding the above limit, without delay suspend all additions of radioactive material to the tank and within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> reduce the tank contents to within the limit.
b.
The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
VEI 4.11.2.2 The quantity of radioactive material contained in each gas storage tank shall be determined to be within the above limit at least once per 7 days whenever radioactive materials are added to the tank and at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> during primary coolant system degassing operationsi-by-ana~f-the COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT2 Page 3/4 11-3 AMENDMENTA, 438, 468, 175
ATTACHMENT'3ATO C0999-02 PROPOSED TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS PAGES REVISED PAGES UNIT 1 3/4 4-18 3/4 4-19 3/4 4-20 3/4 11-3
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM CkKhLi5X3K.
LIMITI NDITI N F R
PERA I 3.4.7 The Reactor Coolant System chemistry shall be maintained within the limits specified in Table 3.4-1.
At all times.
~~IN:
MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4 With any one or more chemistry parameter in excess of its Steady State Limitbut within its Transient Limit, restore the Parameter to within its Steady State Limitwithin 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBYwithin the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
b.
With any one or more chemistry parameter in excess of its Transient Limit, be in at least HOT STANDBYwithin 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
At all other times With the concentration of either chloride or fluoride in the Reactor Coolant System in excess of its Steady State Limitfor more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or in excess of its Transient Limit, reduce the pressurizer pressure to
< 500 psig, ifapplicable, and perform an analysis to determine the effects of the out-of-limitcondition on the structural integrity of the Reactor Coolant System; determine that the Reactor Coolant System remains acceptable for continued operations prior to increasing the pressurizer pressure above 500 psig or prior to proceeding to MODE 4.
IL E RE IRE 4.4.7 The Reactor Coolant System chemistry shall be determined to be within the limits by analysis of those parameters at the frequencies specified in Table 4.4-3.
Performance of this surveillance is not required when the reactor is defueled with no forced circulation.
COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT1 Page 3/4 4-18 AMENDMENT
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM A T T~BL1~4-LA T YT I TRY LIMIT R~RhKKE DISSOLVED OXYGEN*
CHLORIDE FLUORIDE STEADY STATE
< 0.10 ppm 6 0.15 ppm 6 0.15 ppm TRANSIENT
~lv~ll 6 1.00 ppm S 1.50 ppm
~ 1.50 ppm
- Limitmnot applicable withT~ S 250'F.
COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT1 Page 3/4 4-19
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM T~ABLE4.4-Y EM IS I
T V I R
I a~ma DISSOLVED OXYGEN*
~ CHLORIDE FLUORIDE SAMPLE AND Y I Y
At least once per 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> At least once per 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> At lease once per 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />
- Not required with T 6 250'F.
BVg COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNITI Page 3/4 4-20 AMENDMENT
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVEEFFLUENTS T
ET DIT F
3.1 1.2.2 The quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas storage tank shall be limited to 43,800 curies noble gas (considered as Xe-133).
~T~IN:
With the quantity of radioactive material in any gas storage tank exceeding the above limit, without delay suspend all additions of radioactive material to the tank and within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> reduce the tank contents to within the limit.
b.
The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
V 4.1 1.2.2 The quantity of radioactive material contained in each gas storage tank shall be determined to be within the above limit at least once per 7 days whenever radioactive materials are added to the tank and at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> during primary coolant system degassing operations.
I COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT 1 Page 3/4 11-3 AMENDMENT69~ ~~ %8~ &9
0
~,l
ATTACHMENT3B TO C0999-02 PROPOSED TECI-INICALSPECIFICATIONS PAGES REVISED PAGES UNIT2 3/4 4-17 3/4 4-18, 3/4 11-3
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION ANDSURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM QQBLZKEY..
3.4.7 The Reactor Coolant System chemistry shall be maintained within the limits specified in Table 3AI.
At all times.
hGXLQE MODES1,2,3 and4 With any one or more chemistry parameter in excess of its Steady State Limit but within its Transient Limit, restore the Parameter to within its Steady State Limitwithin 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
With any one or more chemistry parameter in excess of its Transient Limit, be in at least HOT STANDBYwithin 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following30 hours.
At all other times With the concentration of either chloride or fluoride in the Reactor Coolant System in excess of its Steady State Limit for more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or in excess of its Transient Limit, reduce the pressurizer pressure to 6 500 psig, ifapplicable, and perform an engineering evaluation to determine the effects of the out-of-limit condition on the structural integrity of the Reactor Coolant System; determine that the Reactor Coolant System remains acceptable for continued operation prior to increasing the pressurizer pressure above 500 psig or prior to proceeding to MODE 4.
VILA R
I E
4.4.7 The Reactor Coolant System chemistry shall be determined to be within the limits by analysis of those parameters at the frequencies specified in Table 4.4-3.
Performance of this surveillance is not required when the reactor is defueled with no forced circulation.
COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT2 Page 3/4 4-17 AMENDMENT
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM TABLE 4-LA T Y TE H
I T MBhHKKE DISSOLVED OXYGEN'HLORIDE FLUORIDE DY 6 0.10 ppm S 0.15 ppm 6 0.15 ppm 18atMRLJ
~ 1.00 ppm 5 1.50 ppm 5 1.50 ppm
- Limitsnot applicable with T
~ 6 250'F.
COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT2 Page 3/4 4-18
3/4 LIMITINGCONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVEEFFLUENTS RA ET NK
.3.11.2.2 The quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas storage tank shall be limited to 43,800 curies noble gas (considered as Xe-133).
I BIL At all times.
a.
With the quantity of radioactive material in any gas storage tank exceeding the above limit, without delay suspend all additions of radioactive material to the tank and within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> reduce the tank contents to within the limit.
b.
The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
V I A
RE IREM TS 4.11.2.2 The quantity of radioactive material contained in each gas storage tank shall be determined to be within the above limitat least once per 7 days whenever radioactive materials are added to the tank and at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> during primary coolant system degassing operations.
COOK NUCLEARPLANT-UNIT2 Page 3/4 11-3 AMENDMENT&, 438, 468, MS
l q'I
ATTACHMENT4 TO C0999-02 NO SIGNIFICANTHAZARDS CONSIDERATION EVALUATION Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M), the Licensee for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP) Units 1 and 2, proposes to amend Appendix A, Technical Specifications (T/S), ofFacility Operating Licenses DPR-58 and DPR-74. IAMproposes the followingT/S revisions.
~
T/S Surveillance Requirement 4.4.7, "Reactor Coolant System Chemistry," - delete the requirement to perform this surveillance when the reactor is defueled with no forced circulation.
~
T/S Table 4.4-3, "Reactor Coolant System'hemistry Limits Surveillance Requirements,"
Unit 1 only - change the reactor coolant system (RCS) chemistry sampling frequency from three times per seven days with a maximum interval of 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> to a frequency of at least once per 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
~
T/S Tables 3.4-1, "Reactor Coolant System Chemistry Limits," and 4.4-3, "Reactor Coolant System Chemistry Limits Surveillance Requirements" editorial changes to the footnote on the applicability ofthe dissolved oxygen chemistry limits.
~
T/S Surveillance Requirement 4.11.2.2, "Radioactive Effluents, Gas Storage Tanks,"-
eliminate the prescriptive method for determining the quantity of radioactive material contained in each,gas storage tank, while preserving the general requirement to verify compliance with this limit.
IAM has evaluated this proposed amendment and determined that it does not involve a significant hazard.
According to 10CFR50.92(c),
a proposed amendment to an operating license involves no significant hazards consideration ifoperation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not:
1.
involve a significant increase in the probability of occurrence or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; 2.
create the possibility ofa new or different kind ofaccident from any previously analyzed; or 3.
involve a significant reduction in a margin ofsafety."
~ '
to C0999-02 Page 2 The determination that the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 50.92 are met for this amendment request is indicated below.
1.
Does the change involve a significant increase in the probability of occurrence or consequences ofan accident previously evaluated?
The proposed changes to the RCS chemistry sampling requirements do not affect the probability of a loss-of-coolant accident or steam generator tube rupture, which are evaluated in Sections 14.3 and 14.2.4, respectively, of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR).
RCS contaminant limits are maintained to reduce the potential for RCS leakage or failure due to corrosion. Sampling the RCS for contaminants does not initiate an accident.
Deleting the requirement to obtain samples when the reactor is defueled does not modify any plant equipment or affect plant operation and therefore does not introduce any new accident initiators or precursors.
Suspension of RCS chemistry sampling when the reactor is defueled does not increase the potential for RCS leakage or failure because the corrosive effects of the contaminants is minimal during this low-temperature, low-pressure condition.
To ensure elevated contaminant levels would be detected and corrected prior to subjecting the system to a high-temperature condition, chemistry sampling will be reinstated within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> of re-establishing forced circulation and prior to entering Mode 6.
Removing the restriction for analyzing primary coolant chemical contaminants at least three times every seven days does not change the maximum surveillance interval.
This change allows the sample to be collected two or three times per week, consistent with the maximum 72-hour interval.
The 72-hour sampling and analysis interval is consistent'with the current requirement in the Unit 2T/S, and industry guidance in NUREG-0452, "Standard Technical Specifications."
The 72-hour interval continues to provide adequate assurance that concentrations in excess ofthe limits are detected in sufficient time to take corrective actions.
Therefore, the probability ofoccurrence of
. a previously evaluated accident is not increased.
This change does not alter the quantity of radioactive material in any system during normal plant operation, the amount of shielding provided by plant systems, or the mitigative capabilities of any system following an event.
Therefore, the consequences ofa previously evaluated accident are not increased.
The editorial changes to the RCS chemistry T/S provide consistency between the Unit 1 and Unit 2 T/S and the Standard Technical Specifications.
These changes do not affect the design or operation ofany system, structure, or component in the plant. The accident analysis assumptions and results are unchanged.
No new failures or interactions are created.
The amount of radioactive material in the gas storage tanks is controlled to ensure that, in the event of a rupture of one of these tanks, the resulting total body exposure to an individual at the nearest site boundary would not exceed 0.5 rem.
The accidental waste gas release event is summarized in Section 14.2.3 of the UFSAR.
Sampling to determine the radioactivity levels in the tanks does not initiate an accident or identify any accident precursors.
The increased to C0999-02 Page 3 sampling flexibilitydoes not change the method of operating the waste gas system, nor does it modify any interfaces with other plant systems.
Therefore, this change does not increase the probability ofoccurrence ofan accidental waste gas release event.
Implementation of a different sampling method does not change the maximum quantity of radioactive material specified in the T/S LimitingCondition for Operation (LCO). The sampling method has no effect on normal plant gaseous radwaste activities, so the composition of the radioactive gaseous nuclides present in the tank at the time of the event is not affected.
As the proposed revision allows a change to the method ofsampling but does not affect the radioactivity limit for the gas storage tanks, the proposed change does not increase the consequences of an accidental waste gas release event.
Therefore, the probability of occurrence or the consequences of accidents previously evaluated are not increased.
2.
Does the change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
The proposed changes to revise the RCS chemistry sampling frequency and to suspend RCS chemistry sampling when the reactor is defueled with no forced circulation does not change the method of operating any equipment or the operational limits of any equipment.
The proposed changes do not introduce any new failure mechanisms to the RCS or any other plant systems.
The proposed change does not involve any physical alterations to any plant equipment, and causes no change in the method by which any plant system performs its function.
Editorial changes to footnotes for Tables 3.4-1 and 4 4-3 provide consistency between the T/S for Unit 1
and Unit 2, but do not change the methods of operating any equipment or introduce any new failure mechanisms.
The proposed change to eliminate the prescriptive waste gas tank sampling method does not introduce any new failure mechanisms to the waste disposal
- system, involve any physical changes to the waste disposal system or any other plant systems, or change the way any plant systems are operated.
This change does not change any interfaces between the waste disposal system and any other plant systems.
The proposed changes continue to ensure the system is operated within the existing limit established by the T/S LCO.
- Thus, no adverse safety considerations are introduced by this proposed change to the T/S.
Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
gt
~
~ to C0999-02 Page 4 3.
Does the change involve a significant reduction in a margin ofsafety?
The margin of safety pertinent to the RCS chemistry surveillance is related to the concentration of chemical contaminants that would expedite corrosion of the RCS piping and components and the period of time during which the system is allowed to operate outside the T/S limits.
The proposed changes to the RCS chemistry surveillance do not alter either of these criteria.
These proposed changes do not affect any safety limits or T/S parameter limits. The proposed changes do not introduce new equipment, equipment modifications, or new or different modes of plant operation.
These changes do not affect the operational characteristics of any equipment or systems.
The editorial changes to footnotes for Tables 3.4-1 and 4.4-3 provide consistency between the T/S for Unit 1 and 2, but do not affect the acceptance criteria or surveillance frequencies for this T/S.
The margin of safety pertinent to the waste gas storage tanks is related to the quantity of radioactivity that would be released in the unlikely event ofa tank rupture. The proposed change to the gas storage tank T/S eliminates the prescriptive sampling methodology, but does not affect the requirement to periodically quantify the radioactive gaseous material in the gas storage tanks.
The proposed change does not affect the quantity of radioactivity allowed in the gas storage tanks, nor does it alter the methodology, assumptions, or results of any safety analyses.
The proposed change to delete the prescriptive sampling method does not affect any safety limits or T/S parameter limits.
Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve a significant reduction in a margin ofsafety.
In summary, based upon the above evaluation, I&Mhas concluded that the proposed amendment involves no significant hazards consideration.
ATTACHMENT5 TO C0999-02 ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT Indiana Michigan Power Company (18cM) has evaluated this license amendment request against the criteria for identification of licensing and regulatory actions requiring environmental assessment in accordance with 10 CFR 51.21. 18'as determined that this license amendment request meets the criteria for a categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR51.22(c)(9).
This determination is based on the fact that this change is being proposed as an amendment to a license issued pursuant to 10 CFR 50 that changes a requirement with respect to installation or
'se of a facility component located within the restricted area, as defined in 10 CFR 20, or that changes an inspection or a surveillance requirement, and the amendment meets the following specific criteria:
(i)
The amendment involves no significant hazards consideration.
As demonstrated in Attachment 4, this proposed amendment does not involve significant hazards consideration.
(ii)
There is no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite.
As documented in Attachment 1, there will be no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts ofany effluents released offsite.
(iii)
There is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The proposed changes will not result in significant changes in the operation or configuration of the facility. There willbe no change in the level of controls or methodology used for processing of radioactive effluents or handling ofsolid radioactive waste, nor willthe proposal result in any change in the normal radiation levels within the plant.
Therefore, as documented in, there will be no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure resulting from this change.
O.
N r
l'