ML18130A411

Crdr Final Summary Rept, Vols 1 & 2

ML18130A411
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	03/31/1986
From:	VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML18130A413	List: ML18130A411 ML18149A074
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 NUDOCS 8604070133
Download: ML18130A411 (864)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:.* ,.-. ' . ' ~-. * *l CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW FINAL

SUMMARY

REPORT VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Surry Power Station Volume 1 .----~-* 8664-070133 86033-1-**. r PDR ADOCK 05000280 I p PDR '

• TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES -I LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 1.0 2.0

3.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 CRDR Program Structure

1.2 Review

and Assessment

1.3 Review

Procedur.es

1.4 Documentation

and Document Control 1.5 Management and Staffing 1.6 Assessment and Disposition of HEDs 1. 7 Implementation OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW 2.1 Operator Questionnaires and Interviews

2.2 Documentation

Review CONTROL ROOM SURVEY 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 Workspace Survey Anthropometric Survey Illumination Survey Ambient Noise Survey Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Survey Emergency Equipment.survey Maintainability Survey Communications Survey Annunciator Survey Controls Survey Displays Survey Labels and Location Aids Survey Conventions Survey Computer System Survey ii iv V vi 1 1 2 4 7 12 12 14 15 15 21 23 25 37 48 54 64 67 72 77 91 108 130 149 165 171

• *
• TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued}

4.0 SYSTEM

FUNCTIONS REVIEW AND TASK ANALYSIS AND VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION

4.1 System

Functions Review and Task Analysis 4.2 Verification of Component_ Availability and Suitability

4.3 Validation

of Control Room Functions

5.0 ASSESSMENT

OF HEDs . 5.1 Introduction to Assessment 5.2 The Assessment Process 203 203 207 216 232 232 233 5.3 HED Category/Priority 237 APPENDIX A -OPERATOR QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORMS A-1 APPENDIX B -SFRTA EXAMPLE: DETERMINATION OF ACTION AND INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX C -SCENARIOS FOR VALIDATION WALK-THROUGHS APPENDIX D -HED REPORTS iii B-1 C-1 D-1 --~--~---~ --~-----, I

• LIST OF TABLES Tables Page 2-1 NUMBER OF INTERVIEW PHEDs 17 2-2

SUMMARY

OF DOCUMENTATION REVIEW 22 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS AND.HEDs GENERATED 27 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 39 3-3 ILLUMINATION SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 52 3-4A NOISE SURVEY RECORD (Unit 1) 57 3-4B NOISE SURVEY RECORD (Unit 2) 60 3-4c AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 63 3-5 HVAC SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 66 3-6 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs 69 GENERATED 3-7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED_- 74

• 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 79 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED

-94 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 111 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 133 3-12 LABELS SURVEY .FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 152 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 167 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS AND HEDs GENERATED 174 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE. CAP ABILITIES 210 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS 220 5-1 POTENTIAL FOR ERROR ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 236 5-2 CONSEQUENCE OF ERROR ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 238

• iv I -LIST OF FIGURES
• Figure Page 1-1 THE TASK FLOW/RELATIONSHIPS OF THE CR REVIEW 3 1-2 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PROCESS 9 1-3 HED REPORT PAGE 1 AND PAGE 2 10 1-4 VIRGINIA POWER CRDR PROJECT TEAM 13 3-3A UNIT 1 -ILLUMINATION MEASUREMENTS 50 3-3B UNIT 2 -ILLUMINATION MEASUREMENTS 51 3-4A UNIT 1 -NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS 56 3-4B UNIT 2 -NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS 59 4-1 SAMPLE AIRD FORM 205 4-2 SAMPLE AIRS FORM 206 4-3A INSTRUCTIONS FOR VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM 217 FUNCTIONS 4-3B VALIDATION OF CR FUNCTIONS DATA FORM 218 -* 5-1 HED PRIORITY RECORD 233
• V
  • *
• LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

_AND ACRONYMS The following abbreviations and acronyms are used in this report: Acronym AIRDS AIRS ALB APDMS ATWS BIT CPT CR. CRDR CRT eves EOP EP ERC ERG FRP GPM HED HEDAT HF HP HVAC Definition Action-Information Requirements Details .Action-Information Requirements Summary Annunciator Light Box Axial Power Distribution Monitoring System Anticipated Transient Without Scram Boron Injection Tank Complete (No further action needs to be taken) Control Room Control Room Design Review Cathode Ray Tube Chemical Volume Control System Emergency Operating Procedure Emergency Procedure Emergency Response Capability

• . Emergency Response Guidelines Function Restoration Procedure Gallons Per Minute
• Human Engineering Discrepancy Human Engineering Discrepancy Assessment Team Human Factors Health/Physics Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
• vi
• Acronym Definition I&C Instrumentation and Control IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers LER Licensee Event Report LOCA Loss-of-Coolant Accident MPS Malfunction Primary System NOD Nuclear Operations Department NRC Nucle*ar Regulatory Commission NSSS Nuclear Steam Supply System NUREG Nuclear Regulatory Guide para Paragraph PHED Preliminary Human Engineering Discrepancy P&ID Piping & Instrumentation Diagram
• PS Primary System RCP Reactor Coolant Pump RCS Reactor Coolant System RVLIS Reactor Vessel Liquid Inventory System Rx Reactor RWST Refueling Water Storage Tank SFRTA Systems Functions Review and Task Analysis SGTR Steam Generator Tube Rupture SI Safety Injection SPDS Safety Parameters Display System SRO Senior Reactor Operator
• vii
• *
• Acronym VHF V&V WOG-ERG
• Definition Very High Frequency Verification of Task Performance Capability and Validation of CR Functions Westinghouse Owners' Group Emergency Response Guidelines

./ viii

• * *

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report has been prepared in response to NUREG-0737 item 1.D.1 and details the means by which the Review and Assessment Phase of a Control Room Design Review (CRDR) was conducted for the Surry Power Station, owned and operated by the Virginia Electric and Power Company. Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 share a common control room. The review and assessment process was conducted using NUREG-0700, NUREG-0801, and NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 as guidance. 1.1 CRDR Program Structure The CRDR is being conducted in three phases as follows: 1.1.1 Phase I -Project Planning The initial phase in this review involved preparation of a Control Room Design Review (CRDR) Program Plan Which was submitted to the NRC .on March 1, 1984. The Pr_ogram Plan was based on guidance contained in NUREGs-0700, 0801, and 07*37 Supplement 1 (paragraph 5.2.a). The Program Plan addressed the following topics: 1. Review plan 2. Management and staffing 3. Documentation and document control 4. Review procedures

5. Assessment

6. Reporting

7. Implementation.

The organ"ization arid scheduling reflected in the Program Plan were selected to coincide with other Virginia Electric and Power Company Emergency Response Capabilities (ERC) initiatives (e.g., RGl. 97, EOP upgrade, SPDS implementation, etc.). Unless otherwise indicated, the review process as described in this summary report follows the approach presented in the Program Plan. 1.1.2 Phase II-* Review and Assessment The second phase of the CRDR involved collection, reduction and analysis of data pertaining to the adequacy of the CR design from a human factors perspective, and 1

• *
• assessment of any human engineering discrepancies (HEDs) identified during this process
• The assessment procedure included:

1. A determination of the error potential, consequence of error and safety importance of each HED. 2. Identification of potential HED resolutions.

3. Assurance that no additional*

HEDs are introduced as a result of these resolutions. The present report represents the conclusion of Phase II for Surry Power Station. The report describes the methods, results and implications of the Surry CRDR. 1.1.3 Phase m -Implementation The final phase in the CRDR will be to implement the corrective actions for significant HEDs. Following implementation, the HEDs will be re-reviewed to ensure that the corrective actions were . complete and adequate and that no new HEDs have been introduced. If, for some reason, a safety-significant HED cannot be fully corrected, the cause and consequence of this condition will be documented.

1.2 Review

and Assessment Figure 1-i shows, in general, the task flow for the review and assessment phase of the Control Room Design Review. A brief discussion of the activities conducted in the review follows this figure. The Control Room Design Review was conducted using the NUREG-0700 guidelines. Planning, staffing, technical approach, and prioritization were conducted in accordance with the guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The present Control Room Design Review report closely fallows the outline recommended in Section 5.2 of NUREG-07-00. Specifically, this final report discusses:

• The Control Room Design Review phases
• The technical activities review of operating experience assembly of control room documentation conduct of control room surveys system/function/task analysis verification of task performance capability validation of control room functions
• Method of assessment of discrepancies
• Method of identification and selection of enhancement and design solutions 2
• DEVELOP PROGRAM PLAN REVIEW . OPERATING EXPERIENCE ASSEMBLE CONTROL ROOM TATION SYSTEM FUNCTIONS AND TASK ANALYSIS CONDUCT CONTROL ROOM SURVEYS
• VERIFY TASK MANCE CAPABILITY VALIDATE CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS FIGURE 1-1 ASSESS PANCIES ANALYZE AND SELECT POTENTIAL CORRECTIVE ACTION THE TASK FLOW/RELATIONSHIPS OF THE CR REVIEW
• DEVELOP FINAL REPORT DEVELOP CORRECTIVE ACTION SCHEDULE
• *
• o A review of the results of human engineering discrepancy assessment
• The selected enhancement and design solutions will be organized into the following groups: operating experience review findings (documentation, etc.) survey findings (annunciator, communications, etc.) task. analysis findings (panel/workspace) and verification of human factors engineering suitability and validation of functions findings (control room traffic, workload distribution, and man/machine functional allocations)
• o Improvements to be made enhancements/justification/extent of correction

-design alternative/justification/extent of correction . o Scope and scheduling of additional human engineering activities.

1.3 Review

Procedures This section presents, in general terms, the review procedures employed. Detailed descriptions of the procedures employed and results of each activity a_re presented in Sections 2.0 -4.0. Data collection, analysis and documentation were subdivided into five subtasks as follows: o Review of Operating Experience o Assembly of Control Room Documentation o Control Room Surveys o System Functions Review and Task Analysis (SFR TA) o Verification of Task Performance Capability and Validation of Con:-* trol Room Functions.

1.3.1 Review

of Operating Experience This task was composed of two subtasks:

1) conduct of operator questionnaires and interviews, and 2) review of plant operational experience through Licensee Event Reports, Deviation Reports, and Engineering Work Requests.

This review task was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of NUREG-0700.

1.3.2 Assembly

of Control Room Documentation In this task, a control room data base was established to support subsequent evaluation. A library was established with control room related documentation (technical specifications, drawings, etc.), control room components were photo-documented, and a half-scale photo mosaic mockup was constructed. The library and photo-documentation were located to support the effort. In addition to the library and photographic 4

• * * ------documentation, a control room inventory of components was developed, id*entifying
• for each component its location, system relationships, functions, and characteristics.

Included in the inventory was all the information necessary to verify the availability of instruments required to meet the operator information and action needs identified in the SFR TA (see Sections 1.3.:i and 1.3.5). 1.3.3 Control Room Surveys Much of the detailed assessment of the control room was conducted through checklist surveys. Surveys required the collection of data using preconstructed checklists and interview forms, and the taking of direct measurements of control room parameters such as noise levels, light levels, etc. The survey criteria ar~ presented in the appropriate* survey sections. (3.1 -3.14}. For each survey, in Sections 3.1 -3.1.4 a summary of Human . . Engineering Discrepancies is included. The surveys conducted were:

• Workspace

-checklist evaluation of various control room istics, such as layout and arrangement

• of CR furnishirigs, CR accessibility, etc.
• Anthropometrics

-analysis of reach and visual access to control room components given physical configuration of boards, panels, layout, etc. The dat.a were subsequently compared to checklist item requirements.

• Illumination

-measurements were taken under various conditions (e.g., normal and emergency lighting) and compared to individual NUREG-0700 items. .

• Noise -direct measurements of noise levels were taken and pared to individual checklists items.
• Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HV AC) -evaluation by direct measurement of HV AC parameters and comparison to NUREG-0700 criteria.
• Emergency Equipment

-data were collected by walk-throughs, use of emergency garments, and checklist application.

• Maintainability

-checklist and questionnaire data. concerning operator-maintained components (trend recorders, bulbs, etc.).

• Communications

-checklist evaluation of communications systems.

• Annunciators

-checklist evaluation of annunciator systems; direct measurement of annunciator fonts, signal intensities, etc.

• Controls -checklist evaluation of controls.
• Displays -checklist evaluation of displays.
• Labels and location aids~ checklist evaluation of labels and location aids . 5
• *
• o Design Conventions

-evaluations by survey for the conventions listed below. The data were subsequently compared to NUREG-0700 guidelines. coding methods (color, shape, patteri::i, etc.) standardization of abbreviations and acronyms ,.. consistency of control use consistency of display movement or indication o Computers -checklist evaluation of computer systems. / 1.3.4 System Functions Review and Task Analysis (SFR TA) System functions and tasks were identifi~d and evaluated in this task. A four-step procedure was employed: o Identification of systems and subsystems by review of plant tation and NSSS. operating guidelines, and discussions with plant operations staff o Identification of event sequences to undergo Task Analysis. These were identified using: NUREGs-0737, -0660, and -0700 Westinghouse Owners' Group Emergency Response Guidelines, Revision 1 (WOG-EllGs, Rev. 1) o Identification of system/subsystem functions through document review and operator comment o

• Identification and analysis of control room operational tasks. Task Analysis data served as an input to the verification of task performance capability and validation of control room functions

(~ee paragraph 1.3.5). The result/product of this task was the specification of operator action and information requirements for all tasks performed (which provide emergency response capabilities) under emergency conditions.

1.3.5 Verification

of Task Performance Capability and Validation of CR Functions (V&::V) This evaluation task involved .three subtasks:

1) verification of instrument/control availability, 2) verification of human engineering suitability, and 3) validation of CR functions.

The first, verification of availability, was conducted using the Task Analysis and control room inventory. In general, tasks associated with control room functions were examined in terms of appropriate instrumentation in the control room (i.e., task equipment demands vs. actual equipment present in the control room).

• When specified information or control requirements were not met, HED reports were prepared, including a description of the problem and an estimate of the potential effect on operator ance. 6
• *
• Estimations of nonprocedurally-bound operations (e.g., boration, etc.) were rated via operator responses during the V&V process. Also task sequences required in selected event sequences were estimated as to frequency of occurrence in the event sequences.

Comparing both frequency* and requirements data to the inventory, identifica-. tion was made of: 1) the *absence (in the control room) of task-required information or control, 2) the estimated frequency with which the information or control is required, and 3) the conditions (events, procedures, etc.) under which the information or control is *required. The second subtask, verification of human engineering suitability, involved using identified functional groups, and checklists to evaluate human engineering suitability in terms of sequence of component" use, control/display proximity, and so forth. NUREG-0700 guidelines served as the principal source document for evaluation criteria. The final subtask, validation of CR functions, involved analysis of workload and distribution of workload for operators performing specific task and event sequences. Also, overall control room traffic was analyzed. Where potential problems in operator movement or workload were identified, walk-throughs were conducted at the Surry simulator . 1.4 Documentation and Document Control

• Three types of documentation were addressed:

1) reference . documentation, 2) process and Human Engineering Discrepancy documentation, and 3) Control Room Design Review output findings and reports. 1.4.1 Reference Documentation A program library was established with reference documents to support the detailed Control Room Design Rev~ew tasks. It contains:

• Licensee Event Reports
• Deviation Reports
• Engineering Work Requests
• Technical specifications and system descriptions
• Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams
• Floor plans
• Instrument lists
• Panel drawings and photographs
• Software descriptions 7
• * *
• NSSS operating guidelines (Rev. 1 WOG-ERGs)
• Upgraded emergency operating procedures (draft Rev. 1)
• Samples of computer printouts
• Various Nuclear Regulatory Commission and industry documents bearing on control room design (i.e., NUREGs-0700 and -0660, IEEE specifications and standards, human factors engineering texts, etc.). As required, this documentation was referenced to support specific tasks within the control room evaluations.

1.4.2 Process

Documentation Data collection and reduction methods were documented for reporting purposes. The general flow of information management is presented in Figure 1-2. Task plans served as the basic process documentation. All data collected during the review were maintained in individual task folders in the central project files at Essex. The completed task plans will be turned over to the Virginia Electric and Power Company. 1.4.3 Guideline Human Engineering Discrepancy Documentation Data files for each Human Engineering Discrepancy were generated. For each task requiring a report, file space was reserved for that report. The following information was recorded for each Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED):

• NUREG-0700 guideline number
• Human engineering discrepancy problem description
• Human engineering discrepancy-assessment
• Human Engineering Discrepancy locations (components which are discrepant from the NUREG-0700 guidelines)
• Action to be taken on the Human Engineering Discrepancy.

Figure 1-3 presents the Human Engineering Discrepancy form used to document and report findings. All HEDs were entered into and are maintained within an electronic data base management system. The electronic data base management system will be used for tracking purposes to ensure satisfactory completion of Phase III, Implementation of Corrective Actions

• 8
• DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 1 COLLECT DATA IDENTIFY HEDs DOCUMENT FILE *
• DATA COLLECTION
• * *
• PROCEDURE 2 *
• COLLECT DATA * * * * *
• IDENTIFY HEDs * * * * *
• DOCUMENT * * * * *
• FILE * * * * *
• ASSESS AND PRIORITIZE HEDs UPDATE FILES IDENTIFY RESOLUTION UPDATE FILES DEVELOP SCHEDULES/

RESOLUTIONS REPORT FIGURE 1*2 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PROCESS 9 *

• DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE N *
• COLLECT DATA *
• IDENTIFY HEDs *
• l>OCUMENT
• FILE
• *
• HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY (HED) REPORT PLANT/UNIT ORIGINATOR:

VALIDATED BY: HED NO.: DATE: --------&) HED TITLE: ------------------------- b) ITEMS INVOLVED: c) PROBLEM DESCRIPTION AND 0700 PARA. NUMBER: d) DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: e) SPECIFIC HUMAN ERROR(s): FIGURE 1-3 HED REPORT PAGE 1 10

• f) SUGGESTED BACKFIT:
• g) REVIEW AND DISPOSITION:
• HED REPORT (CONTINUED)

HED NO: ____ _ PLANT/UNIT FIGURE 1*3 (CONTINUED) HED REPORT PAGE 2 11

• *
• 1.5 Management and Staff~ Project management and staffing were fully described in the CRDR program plan. As described in the program plan, the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR team was established to include representatives from a1i disciplines necessary to ensure optimum performance of the review team. As such, engineering, operations, human factors, and other needed disciplines were included on the team. The CRDR team was composed of up to 27 members, lOponstituting the dedicated core team. The core group was supplemented on an as-required basis by the remaining individuals.

The structure of the CRDR team is shown in Figure 1-4. The structure of the team has not changed since the program plan was written. However, in mid-1985 the composition of the team did change somewhat. Most notably, Mr. J. S. Fisher and Mr. R. F. Anderson are now, respectively, the Site Operations Coordinators for Surry and North Anna Power Stations. The are also responsible for EOP generation at their respective stations. Both Mr. Fisher and Mr. Anderson hold SRO licenses and collectively represent over 30 years of nuclear operations experience. In addition, Mr. T .. J. Voss replaced Mr. David Eike as the Lead Human Factors Specialist for North Anna Power Station. Previously Mr. Voss had been involved in the data collection activities for the project,_ and he has more than 5 years of experience in the application of human factors engineering to the nuclear power industry

• An in-progress audit of the Surry CRDR was held in November 1984. Concerning project staffing, the NRC audit team recommended that Virginia Electric and Power Company personnel be more directly involved in the conduct qf the control room survey. As such, a sizable portion of the CR survey activities were conducted not only with the . half-scale photo-mosaic, but also in the Surry control room with the Surry Site Operations Coordinator in attendance.

During on-site activities, which involved all of the 14 CR survey areas (see Section 1.3.3), on-shift operations personnel were frequently involved in

• explaining the manner in which systems and components function as well as responding to other issues and questions concerning checklist items. 1.6 Assessment and Disposition of HEDs The final activity in the review process was the assessment and recommended disposition of human engineering discrepancies.

This activity was conducted in two parts. First, each HED was assessed for its potential to induce operator errors, by considering the potential impact on human performance. Second, the effect of the error, especially in terms of plant safety, was estimated by determining which systems and/or plant functions would be affected. Once this assessment was completed, the recommended HED 12

• PROJECT ENGINEER T.L. GERMON I
• LEAD DISCIPLINE ENGINEER H.W. BURRUSS 'NOD CORPORATE PROJECT COORDINATOR I 1--------------..L---------------------T-----

T.A. HARDING I

• SITE OPERATIONS COORDINATOR NORTH ANNA R.F.ANDERSON I I I OPERATIONS TRAINING G.E. PEDERSON !D!coRE TEAM MEMBERS
• MEMBER OF HEDAT I I "l&C ENGINEERING B.F. HILL I A&E I
• SITE OPERATORS COORDINATOR SURRY J.S. FISHER I OPERATIONS TRAINING L.E. GARDNER FIGURE 1*4 'NORTH ANNA LEAD HUMAN FACTORS SPECIALIST T.J. VOSS NORTH ANNA HUMAN FACTORS SPECIALISTS D.L. PILSITZ N.S. KFOURY VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER CRDR PROJECT TEAM I DDC H.E. ENGEL HF PROJECT MANAGER
• H.P. VAN COTT
• SURRY LEAD HUMAN FACTORS SPECIALIST W.T. TALLEY SURRY HUMAN FACTORS SPECIALISTS D.L. PILSITZ N.S. KFOURY
• *
• disposition was determined.

Disposition included enhancements, design changes, and/or more detailed studies to determine specific design solutions. A detailed description of the HED assessment process is presented in Section 5.0 of this report. 1. 7 Implementation Phase III of the CRDR will implement the corrective actions for HEDs. Virginia Electric and Power Company will give a schedule for the implementation of corrective actions in a separate document . 14

• *
• 2.0 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW The operating experience review consisted of two tasks: . 1) conduct of operator questionnaires and interviews, and 2) review of documents related to plant operating experience.

The methodology and results of these tasks are described in the following sections.

2.1 Operator

Questionnaires and Interviews Questionnaires and interviews were conducted in accordance with NUREG-0700 as part of the Control Room Design Review (CRDR) performed at Surry Power Station. The objective was to solicit from control room operating personnel comments and observations concerning selected aspects of the design and operation of the Surry control room. The methodology and results of the questionnaires and interviews are described in the fallowing sections. 2.Ll Methodology Operator questionnaires and interviews are conducted as part of the operating . experience review for a CRDR to identify and record any human engineering discrep-. ancies (HEDs) that have been encountered during the operation of the plant. . 0700 recommends that a range of operations personnel be interviewed, including tions managers, shift supervisors, shift technical advisors, senior reactor operators, reactor operators, and auxiliary operators. The approach recommended ~y NUREG-0700 follows the general format of the critical incident technique in which the respondent is asked to describe specific incidents that demonstrate positive or negative aspects of the design and/or operation of the control room. This approach allows the interviewer to focus on critical success, failure and near-miss situations encountered in actual plant operation. These situations are then analyzed, from a human engineering perspective, to determine any causal or contributing factors related to the design and/or operation of the control room. In the present study, the operator questionnaires and interviews were part of an integrated CRDR process that employs four separate data collection techniques: tion,* measurement, document review and operator questionnaires/interviews. Prior to initiation of the CRDR, each guideline in Chapter 6 of NUREG-0700 was systematically 15

• reviewed to determine the most appropriate data collection technique(s)..

Those lines selected for inclusion in the operator questionnaire and interview forms

• were translated into the appropriate format and entered into the forms. Questionnaires were . administered to the operations personnel at Surry Power Station. In addition, 53 interviews were conducted on an individual basis to preclude consensual bias and to maximize the interaction between. interviewer and respondent.

Fourteen areas of concern were included in the questionnaire and interview forms. These included the fallowing: (1) Controls (8) Ambient illumination (2) Displays (9) Communications (3) Verification of task perform-(10) Emergency equipment ance (11) Workspace (4) Labels and location aids (12) Computer system (5) Annunciators (13) Anthropometrics (6) Ambient noise (14) HVAC. (7) Maintainability

• Example questionnaire and interview forms are contained in Appendix A.
• 2.1.2 Questionnaire and Interview Results 2.1.2.1 Operator Demography

-Twenty-five reactor operators, 13 shift supervisors and 15 others were interviewed at the Surry Power Station. The mean number of years of commercial operating experience at Surry is 3.8. Approximately .40% of the operators have also had experience in the U.S. Navy nuclear program. 2.1.2.2 Analysis of .Data and Findings -The operator responses for individual items* were tabulated on summary sheets. Similar operator responses to related items were combined, allowing potential problems to be considered in a more integrated fashion. However, even singular operator responses were treated as potential problems, so that no s.erious problem would be omitted from consideration. Potential problem areas identified by operators were documented as Preliminary Human Engineering Discrepancies (PHEDs) on HED forms (Fi&"ure 1-3). The PHEDs later underwent the formal HED review process as described in Section 5.0. The results of the questionnaires and interviews conducted at Surry revealed 116 PHEDs~ Numbers for the individual HEDs*are given by task plan in the tables contained in 16

• *
• Section 3.0. In the tables th.ese HEDs have an "I" (for interview) in the data collection
• method column. Individual HED descriptions are contained in Appendix D, "HED Reports." The number of HEDs and the major problems by task plan area are given below. (Table 2-1). TABLE 2...;.1 NUMBER OF INTERVIEW PHEDs TASK PLAN AREA # PHEDs # QUESTIONS

1. Controls 13 13 2. Displays 18 13 3. Verification of Task Performance 12 27 4. Labels and Location Aids 6 9 5~ Annunciators 11 8 6. Ambient Noise 3 5 7. Maintainability 3 8 8. Ambient Illumination 2 4 9

• Communications 5 7 10. Emergency Equipment 6 8 11 Workspace 16 10 12. Computer System 13 12 13. Anthropometrics 5 6 14. Heating Ventilation and AC 2 4 15. Conventions 1 _o 116 134 Concerning major problems in the above areas, operators reported that: Controls a. Some controls which must be operated simultaneously are too close together.

b. Some controls activating a critical function do not have a moveable cover or guard. c. Unused controls are still present on the board. d

• e. Controls are duplicated unnecessarily on the control board. There is no feedback provided indicating that pushbutton controls have been activated.

17

• *
• Displays a. System status is inferred by indicator lights. being off rather than ilium ina ted. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i *. Permissive status light indications are inconsistent across systems in the control room. Control status light indication meaning is inconsistent.

Scale ranges on some meters are too wide. *scale ranges on some fueters are too narrow for maximum displayed values. Pointer visibility is poor on scales. Some recorders which operators are required to use are not located in the primary operating area. All visual displays and indications necessary to meet task requirements are not present in the control room. Many recorder windows are dirty, paint sprayed, or scratched. Verification of Task Performance

a. b. c. d. e. f. All instrumentation and equipment needed to meet task requirements and bring the plant to a safe shutdown in normal, abnormal, and emergency conditions is not present in the control room . Status of some shared equipment is not displayed in both units. Unnecessary information is displayed in the control room. Some indicators are not labeled to reflect demand or actual status. Displays are difficult to use because they display normal random variations in equipment performance.

Some displays which must be compared have incompatible scales. Labels and Location Aids a. Labelling for some components is incorrect, incomplete, or missing. b. Annunciator tile legends are wordy and ambiguous.

c. Controls associated with out-of-service equipment are not tagged out in the control room. Annunciators

a. There is a lack of prioritization of incoming alarms in the control room. b. . illuminated annunciator tiles indicate normal conditions.

c. There is no audible alarm cleared signal for annunciator systems

• 18
• Ambient Noise a. The ambient noise level is too high in the control room. b. Construction and maintenance activities are not well regulated during the day shift. Maintainability

a. The supply of expendable and spare parts is inadequate in the control room. b. Tools for replacing expendables are unavailable in the control room. Ambient illumination

a. Significant glare has been reported in the control room. b. Control room operations need to be evaluated under emergency ing conditions.

Communications

a. The conventional powered and sound-powered telephone systems are inadequate.

b. The fixed base VHF and Gaitronics Systems are inadequate.

• Emergency Equipment
• a. The emergency equipment is not properly inventoried or restocked.

b. Operators have had no practice in donning or using protective equipment while performing control room duties. c. Communications problems have been reported while wearing protective equipment.

Workspace

a. Full view of the panels is not possible when sitting at desks. b. The control room is too crowded during shift change, start-up, and transients.

c. Storage for plant operating procedures is inadequate.

d. Personal storage facilities are inadequate.

e. The carpeting lacks padding; this causes fatigue. Computer System a. Computer responses to operator's inputs are too slow. b. Changes to the computer system have not been documented

• c. Data point indices are inadequate for operator use. 19
• *
• d
• e. Printer speed is too slow, and buffer storage is inadequate.

Printer paper take-up spools are missing from the control room. f. Operator computer interface is inadequate.

g. Alarm messages on printouts are not readily distinguishable from other messages.

Anthropometrics

a. Controls are too high and too low on panels. b. . Controls are inconveniently located relative to their associated displays.

c. Displays are located too low and too high on panels. Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning

a. There are cold spots in the control room. b. Control room temperature is too cold in winter. Conventions

a. ALB tile legends are inconsistent with other labelling in the control room .. 20

• *
• 2.2 Documentation Review This section summarizes the results of the documentation review performed to identify documented conditions in the Surry Control Room that may cause human performance problems.

This review consisted of two elements as follows: 1. Review the Surry Power Station Licensee Event Reports (LERs) with potential HED implications

2. Review of Shutdown and Trip Reports, Station Deviation Reports and Engineering Work Requests with potential HED implications.

The methodology and results of these reviews are described briefly in the following paragraphs.

2.2.1 Methodology

The list of Surry Power Station Licensee Event Reports (LERs) was reviewed, and those which involved potential HED implications were selected for further review. These reports were then evaluated to determine the events leading to the problem and the nature of the problem, and to identify potential HEDs associated with the problem. Similarly, lists of Surry Shutdown and Trip Reports, Station Deviation Documents and Engineering Work Requests were reviewed, and those with potential HED implications were selected for further review. These documents were also evaluated to determine the events leading to the problems and the nature of the problems, and to identify potential HEDs associated with the problem. Any human engineering discrepancies identified during the review were documented on HED report forms for later ~onsideration by the HED Assessment Team. 2.2.2 Results Table 2-2 provides a summary of the documentation review results. Each Surry Power Station document (LER, etc.) with potential HED implications is listed along with the associated Preliminary HED. In all, the documentation review yielded 13 PHEDs. The PHEDs were later subjected to the formal review process described in Section 5.0. Individual HED report descriptions are contained in Appendix D

• 21 TABLE 2-2 *

SUMMARY

OF DOCUMENTATION REVIEW DOCUMENT POTENTIAL HED HED NUMBER LER-78-002/031-0 Exceeded interval on APDMS 22A0-5003 transient surveillance LER-78-030/031-0 Last step of APDMS transient 22A0-5004 surveillance not performed LER-78-036/032-0 Compensatory surveillance on 22A0-5005 RCP "C" stator and bearing temp. not performed hourly LER-081-001/03L-O Valve inadvertently closed 22A0-1703 blocking boric acid flow path LER-082-031/03L-O "B" Safety Injection Accumulator 22A0-1704 was overfilled LER-081-014/03L-O Alarm setpoint was miscalculated 22A0-2919 and set too high by H.P.

• technician LER-081-057

/031-0 Circuit breakers for BIT Inlet and 22A0-3035 LER-S1-048/03L-O Outlet opened in error LER-81-039/031-0 Operator opened "A" accumulator

• 22A0"'"3034 drain valve rather than fill .valve LER-78-013/1031-0 Reactor brought critical below 22A0-5002 insertion limits during startup LER-82-044/031-0 RWST temperature allowed to go 22A0-5006
• above tech spec. limits LER.:.81-076/03L-O Diesel Fire Pump Fuel Oil Tank 21A0-5009 below minimum allowable level LER-81-053/031-0 Containment Isolation Valve left 21A0-1701 open locally LER-81-038/031-0 Circuit breakers for valves 21A0-1702 LER-81-047

/03L-O . erroneously open locally

• 22
• 3.0 CONTROL ROOM SURVEY The methodology used to conduct the CR surveys at Surry Power Station rated a mix of traditional procedures and methods tailored to the specific requirements of the plant. The four basic. methods employed within each survey were measurements, observations, questionnaires/interviews, and documentation reviews. Within each of these methods, specific procedures were used to ensure a comprehensive data collection, data reduction, and analysis process. The procedures were organized into a set of standardized task plans. The
• survey process was structured into a number of separate tasks, each task involving a specific set of related control room design features.

For example, mental factors were organized into lighting, noise, HV AC, and workspace ~urveys. This structural approach, coupled with the standardized task plans, allowed for maximum flexibility during data collection, data reduction, and analysis, and resulted in a standard, well-organized self-documenting process. All task plans followed the general format of: 1) Introduction (including the objectives}

2) Review Team Selection and Responsibilities

3) Criteria (from NUREG-0700, Section 6.0) 4) Procedures

5) Equipment and Facility Requirements

6) Inputs and Data Forms 7) Outputs and Results 8) Figures and Tables 9) Procedure Exceptions

10) Appendices (as required).

In addition to this general format, the control room survey task plans incorporated a standardized set of appendices that ensured a consistent well-documented process for data collection, analyses, assessment, implementation and audits. The appendix structure employed was: Appendix A (Criteria) -This is a compendium of all 0700, Section 6.0 criteria in 0700 paragraph number order that is relevant to that task plan. It was used to summarize the final results . 23

• *
• Appendix B (Data Forms) -This appendix is further divided into the following:

Bl Measurements Data Bl.1 Linear Measurements (scalar, force, torque, dimensional, air volume, temperature, humidity) Bl.2 Sound Measurements (noise audi_tory signals, cations systems auditory response characteristics) Bl.3 Light Measur.ements (illumination levels, luminance characteristics, contrast ratios) Bl.4 through Bl.n Others (as required) B2 Questionnaires and Interviews B2.1 Operations B2.2 Engineering B2.3 Instrumentation and Calibration B2.4 Management and Administration B2.5 through B2.n Others (as required) B3 Observation Checklists B4 Documentation Review Checklists BS Analysis Aids for Bl -Measurements B5.1 Analysis Aids for Bl.1 B5.2 . Analysis Aids for Bl.2 B5.3 Analysis Aids for Bl.3 B5.4 through B5.n Analysis Aids for Bl.4 through Bl.n (as required) B6 Analysis Aids for B2 -Questionnaires/Interviews B7 Analysis Aids for B3...: Observation Checklists BB Analysis Aids for B4 -Documentation Review Checklists B9 Additional forms, as required. Prior to conducting the surveys, Appendices B2 {Questionnaires and Interviews) from the various task plans were assembled and used to conduct operator interviews (see Section 2.1 of this report). The results of the interviews were used to direct the focus of the survey effort. An overview of the methods and findings of the CR surveys are presented in the following sections. Appendix C: Criteria Matrix Appendix D: Task Plan Critique .24

• *
• 3.1 Workspace Survey This section documents the results of the workspace survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.1.1 Objectives The objectives of the workspace survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which the workspace layout in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify and document any features of the workspace design that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.1.2 Scope

The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the workspace design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evalua,ted include:

• Furniture and equipment layout
• Document organization and storage
• Supervisor access *
• Nonessential personnel access
• Procedure availability at consoles
• Desk dimensions
• Chair design
• Unit integration and interference
• Personal storage
• Ambience and comfort. 3~1.3 Criteria.

The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.1.3a through g; 6.l.14a through e; 6.1.1.6a and b; _6.1.1. 7; 6.1.2.6; 6.1.2. 7a through d; 6.1.2.Sa through g; 6.1.3.la and b; 6.1.5.6a and b; and 6.1.5. 7a through c. The detailed definitions for each criterion .are presented in Table 3-1

• 25
• 3.1.4 Method 3.1.4.1 Data Collection

a. Data collected during the operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problems with CR workspace.

b. Data were collected through direct observation of the control room workspace, using the checklist contained in the workspace task plan. As necessary, operators on shift at the time of the survey were queried concerning the suitability of the control room workspace.

3.1.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:

a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the items involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 graph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

• c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the workspace task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
• 3.1.5 Findings
• The findings of the workspace survey are presented in Table 3-1 "Workspace Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 56 criteria were applied to the workspace design in the Surry control room. Of these, 2 (496) were not applicable, 31 (5596) were in compliance, and 23 (4196) were not in compliance.

A total of 27 HEDs were generated which document all of the 23 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs were related to the viewing of controls and displays from the operator's desk, the facilitation of communications and access to equipment by furniture and equipment layout, the storage of reference documents and procedures, the location of and communication with the shift supervisor's office, and the provision for and communication with restroom and eating facilities near the control room. Table 3-1 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section 5.0 for an explanation of* assessment category). Note that the category "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED

• 26 TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS~

HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 10 * ;0~/. 7 I -~ II I GUIDELINE q;: 6.1.1.3 FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT LAYOUT a. VIEWING -Desks and *consoles placed I NO 20A00101 CPT permit operators at those desks and 20A02101 Il-5 consoles full view of all control and display panels (including annunciator 20001402 CPT panels) in the primary operating area (see Exhibit 6.1-2). b. COMMUNICATIONS -Desk and con-I NO 20001403, CPT sole placement should facilitate voice communications from operators seated at those work stations to any point in the primary operating area. C, OPERA TOR ACCESS (1) Operator should be able to get to 0 NO 20001404 CPT

• any work station without having 20A00114 Il-6 to overcome obstacles such as 22001401 CPT tripping hazards, poorly positioned filing cabinets or storage racks, maintenance
  • equipment, etc . ( 2) Operators should be able to posi-I NO 20000102 CPT tion themselves conveniently for *20B23001 CPT performing task actions at any 20000201 CPT work station. 20001404 CPT d. CIRCULATION PATTERNS (1) The control room arrangement I NO 23B01001 Il-6 should facilitate efficient unob-structed movement and communi-cation. (2) The control room arrangement I YES should minimize interference between the members of the operational crew .
• 27 TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 10 * /// I !:I .I . cf ,;;; I # I ii GUIDELINE

.. Qi 6.1.1.3 (Cont'd) e. OPERATOR MANEUVERING SPACE -Between the back (operator's position) of desk/consoles and any surface or fixed object behind the operator, adequate space should be allowed for the operator to get into and

• out of a chair freely or to turn in the chair to view the equipment behind. (1) A minimum separation of 36 M NO 22A00112 CPT inches from the back of any desk to any opposing surface is sug-gested as the minimum (see Exhibit 6.1-3). A greater separa-tion is preferable.

(2) Lateral space for a seated M YES opera tor should be no less than 30 inches (see Exhibit 6.1-3). Greater latitude is preferable.

f. EQUIPMENT:--TO-OPPOSING-SURF ACE

• DISTANCE -Enough space should be allowed so that personnel can perform all required tasks. The space should accommodate kneeling and bending, simultaneous work by more than one operator, and simultaneous perform-ance of operational and maintenance tasks as may be required.

Recom-mended minimum separations are illus-trated in Exhibit 6.1-4. (1) A minimum separation of 50 M NO 22A00113 CPT inches is recommended between a single row of equipment/panel and a wall or other opposing surface. (2) A minimum separation of 50 M YES inches is also recommended between two rows of facing . equipment if both rows are worked by a single operator .

• 28 TABLE 3-l WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 10 * ~'i I I !Ii ;; & # i! I I <.; GUIDELINE " $ s .. 6.1.1.3f. (Cont'd) (3) A minimum separation of 8 feet is M YES recommended between opposing rows of equipment where more than one person must work simul-taneously on operational or main-tenance tasks and kneeling, bend-ing, or use of test equipment may be necessary.

g. OPENINGS .....:...

Panels should be laid out 0 NO 20A01003 CPT and maintained, and equipment enclos-ures designed, so .that there are no unguarded openings through which unwanted objects can be introduced. 6.1.1.4 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION AND STORAGE a. ACCESSIBILITY (1) All procedures and other docu-0 NO 22A04001 III-9

• ments that may be needed for 22A05003 CPT ready reference should be kept in 22A05004 CPT the control room. 22A05005 1-2 (2) Reference documents should be 0 NO 22A05003 CPT stored where they are easy to 22A05004 CPT locate and extract for use. They 22A05005 1-2 should not be locked up, stored in places too low or too high for large and small personnel to access easily, in cramped spaces, or where poor illu:n ina tion exists. b. LOCATION AIDS (1) Clearly visible title labels should 0 YES be provided to identify specific documents.

(2) Labels should distinguish docu-0 YES . men ts as much as possible .

• 29
• *
• TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS&.

HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 10 l~lj. ,fa1/ I / 11 .§ I .~ I * ---------.....:.GU:.:ID:.:E:;,;Lllll:.:E _________ +~*+--f--..,..,;.._..;;"'"'-,f-~.,.---if----..,..-----f 6.1.l.4b. (Cont'd) (3) Putting many volumes in one location creates a search problem, especially ff titles are similar. One means'of reducing search time would be to put operational documentation in one location and other documentation in a secondary location.

c. CONVENIENCE OF USE d. e. (1) Documents should not be fixed in racks; it should be possible to remove documents for use .. (2) Documents should be bound so that they can be opened fully and will remain open at the desired place w.ithout holding. PROTECTION

-Documents should be protected fro:n wear so that they do not become dog~ared, dirty, loose, torn, and difficult to read. DEDICATED SETS OF PROCEDURES -Sets of procedures should be separately stored for each unit in a multi\lnit control room. 6.1.1.6 SUPERVISOR ACCESS a. ACCESS -The shift supervisor's office should be located so as to permit prompt physical access to the control room under all conditions, including control room isolation*. The preferred location is within the control room isolation boundary, with placement to permit good visual and voice contact. with -the primary operational area . 30 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES YES 0 NO 20001404 CPT TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 10 * ~I. /1/ I # ;:: # !I: !I, GUIDELINE

• I i6 C. 4' 4l' 6.1.1.6 (Cont'd) b. COMMUNICATIONS -When the shift N/A N/A supervisor's office is not within the control room boundary, dedicated com-munications links between the primary opera ting area and the shift supervisor's office should be provided. (See Guide-line 6.2.1. 7) 6.1.1. 7 NON~ENTIAL PERSONNEL D NO 20000401 CPT ACCF.SS Provision should be made to limit the access and movement of nonessential but authorized personnel to prescribed areas within the con-trol room. 6.1.2.6 USE OF PROCEDURES AND OTHER D NO 20000103 III-9 REFERENCE MATERIALS AT CONSOLES 20000104 III-9 Provision should be made so that the proced 20000116 CPT ures manuals and other reference materials can be consulted easily while *task sequences
• are performed at the consoles.

Exhibit 6.1-15 shows the poor practice of laying manuals down on the benchboard when no convenient place has been provided for them. Exhibit 6.1-16 shows a good solution adopted by several plants: a rolling bookcase is pro-vided for storing and using procedures manuals. 6.1.2.7 DESK DIMENSIONS

a. WORKING SPACE -Desks should 0 YES provide enough clear working space for all materials required for task perform-ance. b. CHAIR POSITIONS

-The desk should 0 YES allow for different chair positions as required, with adequate knee space. ';

• 31

---

~

TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 10

• Iii/! /// I i ,ff ' l $/ $~ , GUIDELINE 6.1.2. 7 (Cont'd) C, OPERATOR COMFORT-The 0 NO 20000105
• CPT relationships of working surface height and area, knee room, and chair height should allow operators to work com-rortably.

Exhibit 6.1-17 illustrates an uncomfortable situation created by desk height and chair design. d. DIMENSIONS -The following desk dimensions are recommended and shown in Exhibit 6.1-18: (1) For seated work only, 26 to 31 M YES inches above the floor (29 inches is a standard height). (2) For sit-stand desks, 36 to 38 NIA NIA inches above the floor. (3) Work surface area depth: 16 M YES inches minimum. * (4) Work surface area width: 24 M YES inches* minimum if tasks involve reading and writing only; 30 inches minimum if other kinds of tasks are required. (5) Knee room height: A distance of M YES approximately 25 inches fro:TI the

• floor to the under-surface of the desk top should provide adequate clearance for 5th to 95th per-. centile male and female adults at
• sit-down-only stations.

-(6) Knee room depth: 18 inches mini-M YES IT!Um, (7) Knee room width: 20 inches mini-M YES mum (greater width prefei:red).

• ,
• 32
• *
• TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 10 1!,~~ I~,~ j/ ~'* / ,.:_ ________ .....:.G::.:.U'D=E~Ll*::E:._

________ .....::"'-1-/.......: ,:.....,.I:.__~"'.:......:~:._.,./:,_.: ac.~r----Cf----1 6.1.2.8 CHAIRS a. b. c. d. e. f. MOBILITY -Chairs should pivot so that operators can readily adjust tion. Mobile bases {casters) are mended for chairs at sit-only stations. BACKRESTS -Chairs should support at least the lower back curvature bosacral region). The recommended angle between the back and the seat is about 1000 for office tasks {such as keyboard tasks). A greater angle is preferred for reading and resting. ARMRESTS -Where personnel may remain seated for relatively long periods, chairs with armrests are ferred .. Adjustable or retractable rests may be necessary to allow the elbows to rest in a natural position and for compatibility with a particular desk/console

• CUSHIONING

-Seat and backrest should be cushioned with at least 1 inch of compressible material, enough so that some resilience remains when the chair is occupied. SEAT AREA -The thighs and the backs of the knees should not be com pressed so as to cause fatigue and culation problems. The seat should be at least 17 inches wide. Seat depth should be 15-17 inches (see Exhibit 6.1-19). SEAT ADJUSTABILITY -For chairs at sit-<lown stations, seat height should generally be adjustable from 15 to 18 inches (Exhibit 6.1-19). For chairs at sit-stand stations, seat height should be adjustable from 26 to 32 inches {Exhibit 6.1-20) . 33 0 YES M YES o* YES M YES M YES 0 M YES TABLE 3-1. WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 10

• la 7 I ;! *~ I! I I . -GUIDELINE " CJ 6.1.2.8 (Cont'd) . g. FOOTRESTS

.,-An adjustable footrest 0 YES or heel catch should be provided to support the feet at a level no more than 18 inches below the seat surface. If a footrest is part of the chair, a circular -design is recommended, diameter 18

• inches. The footrest might be provided on the console base. 6.1.3.1 UNIT INTEGRATION AND INTER-FERENCE a .. EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT

-0 YES Equipment should be arranged with movement and communication patterns in mind, so that unit operations do not interfere with each other. b. SENIOR OPERATOR STATION -I NO 20001402 CPT Senior operators who supervise and assist operations of more than one unit

• need. to be stationed so that they can comm un ica te effectively with operators in each unit and have an unobstructed visual path to the control boards of each unit. 6.1.5.6 PERSONAL STORAGE a. . STORAGE LOCATIONS

-.There should 0

• NO 20000106 CPT be a suitable, out-of-the-way but secure place in which control room personnel may keep their coats and other personal belongings.

b. STORAGE SUITABILITY

-If lockers I NO 20000106 CPT are provided, they should be large enough to h~ld the items that can reasonably be expected to go into them; 6.1.5.7 AMBIENCE AND COMFORT An effort should be made to create a 0 YES pleasant and comfortable work setting in view of the long hours and confining aspects of the control room operator's job .

• 34 TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS ac HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 10 * ~a/ 7 7 ;; # i! I o I fl. GUIDELINE ;:r 6.1.5. 7 (Cont'd) a. DECOR -Features to be considered include: -' (1) Color coordination.

0 YES (2) Use of color and lighting to 0 NO 20000001 Ill-8 create a cheerful atmosphere (without introducing glare and brightness to a degree that causes eye fatigue of an overly intense atmosphere). (3) Visual relief from arrays of 0 YES instrumentation. (4) Comfortable seating. 0 YES (5) Carpeting to lessen the fatigue of 0 NO 20000107 III-9 standing and walking. b

• RESTROOM AND EATING FACILITIES
• (1) A restroom and kitchen or eating 0 NO 20000108 CPT area should be provided within (pre fer ably) or near the control room isolation boundary.

(2) Since formal breaks are not 0 NO 20000108 CPT scheduled in most control rooms, it is important that personnel have access to these facilities without delay. It is preferable that they be used only by control room personnel. (3) Provision should be made for 0 NO 20000108 CPT communication if facilities are 20000211 CPT out of voice contact, so that an operator taking a break can be contacted as necessary by person-nel in the control room. (See -Guideline 6.2.1. 7 .)

• 35
• *
• TABLE 3-1 WORKSPACE SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 10 of 10 ~~~I'! $ ~1/ I / * ~I ii _________ _:,GU:.;,ID::E:::,LIN::.:E~----------1-__;:~'-l--;__./--~.;__;~-./-_;;c."""'""'1~--* --q;:-----{ 6.1.5. 7 (Cont'd) c. REST AREA/LOUNGE -Consideration should be given to providing a rest area (possibly in conjunction with \he eating area) conducive to relaxation' and revitalization, especially where shifts . are long . 36 0 NO 20000108 CPT

• *
• 3.2 Anthropometric Survey This section documents the results of the anthropometric survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.2.1 Objectives The objectives of the anthropometric survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which all stand-up and sit-stand work stations in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify and document any features of the work stations that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.2.2 Scope

The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the work station design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The anthropometric topics evaluated include:

• Stand-up console dimensions
• Sit-stand console dimensions
• Vertical panels
• Operator-display relationships.

3. 2.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.2.2a through g; 6.1.2.3a through h; 6.1.2.4a through c; 6.1.2.Sa and b; and 6. 7 .2.3a through f. The-detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-2. 3.2.4 Method 3.2.4.1 Data Collection

a. Data collected during operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problem areas in the anthropometric characteristics of the control room. b. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the anthropometric task plan . 37

• *
• c. Reach and visual envelopes recommended in NUREG-0700 were -cated on the control boards, and visual observations were made of the relative locations of controls and displays.

Controls and displays falling outside the recommended envelopes were noted and their engineering numbers recorded.

d. Where it was necessary to consider the operational characteristics of the component (e.g., Guideline 6.1.2.5.a(l)}, Surry operating procedures were reviewed and/or operations personnel were consulted.

3.2.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to th~ fallowing procedure:

a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the displays or controls involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

• c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the anthropometric task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria . 3.2.5-Findings The findings of the anthropometric survey are presented in Table 3-2 pometry Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 45 criteria were applied to the displays in the Surry control room. Of these, 14 (31 %) were not applicable, 22 (49%) were in compliance, and 9 (20%) were not in compliance.

A total of 19 HEDs were generated which document all of the 9 criteria that were not met. In general; those HEDs address controls and displays that are located too high or too low on the vertical panels, controls that are not located more than 3 inches away from the edge of the console, and controls that are located more than 25 inches from the front of the console . . Table 3-2 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section 5,0 for an explanation of assessment category). Note that "CPT" means complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED

• 38 TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FIND.INGS HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 9 * ~/ I G !I: !!I> 41 GUIDELINE t: I ~I " C,l 4' C,l 'Ii' 6.1.2.2 STAND-UP CONSOLE DIMENSIONS

a. CONSOLE HEIGHT TO.SEE OVER -M NO 22A02083 1-2 Benchboard When it is necessary for a standing 22A02084 11-6 height is operator to see over the top,,,,console 22A02085 11-6 49", but height (with or without annunciator 22A02086 11-5 vision to panels) should not exceed 58 inches. 22A02087 1-2 lower vertical 22A02088 11-5 panel is blocked. b. CONTROL HEIGHT -(Exhibits 6.1-5 and 6.1-6) (1) The highest control on a stand-up M YES console should be within the highest reach of the 5th percen-tile female without stretching or using a stool, ladder, etc. * (2) The lowest controls on a stand-up M YES console should be within the lowest reach of the 95th percen-tile male without bending or stooping .

• c. BENCHBOARD SLOPE -The bench-M NO 2ZA03036 CPT board slope, in conjunction with its depth, should result in all controls being within the reach radius of the 5th per-centile female,. as illustrated in Exhibit 6.1-6. d! CONTROL DISTANCE FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE CONSOLE (1) Controls should be set back a M NO 22A03037 II-5 minimum of 3 inches from the front edge to protect against accidental activation.

(2) No control should be more than 25 M NO 22A03036 CPT inches from the front edge of the console. This accommodates the -maximum reach of the 5th per-. centile female adult as illustrated in Exhibit 6.1-6. **,

• 39
• *
• TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 o! 9 ti' ~~/ L~ fat/. I * !!I _________

.....:,GU:::ID:::E~Llll:,:E _________ -l-_;:,lf-l-_;:.._,{--°".;......;:4i'_* +-_::CJ---,F---_..;~----; 6.1.2.2 (Cont'd) e. DISPLAY POSITIONING -(Exhibit f. 6.1-7) . (1) DISPLAY HEIGHT AND TATION (2) (a) All displays, including cia.tor tiles, should be mounted so that they are within the upper limit of the visual field (750 above the horizontal line of sight) of the 5th percentile female. (b) In addition, all displays and annunciators should be mounted so that the angle from the line of sight to the face plane is 450 or greater. The 5th percentile female determines the upper limit. The 95th percentile male determines the lower limit. HORIZONTAL DISPLACE-MENT -The oblique angle from the line of sight to a display located to either side of the working position from which the display must be read should be at least 45°. This includes ciator tiles, which should be able from the acknowledge button. (See Exhibit 6.1-8.) LATERAL SPREAD OF CONTROLS -AND DISPLAYS -The operator should be able to perform task sequences at a given work station with minimum repositioning. The amount of operator movement required depends on the arrangement of controls and displays, not simply on the lateral dimensions of the segments of the control board. The maximum lateral spread of controls and displays at a single-operator work station should not exceed 72 inches . 40 M YES M YES M YES M YES *,

• *
• TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 9 IUIDELINE 6.1.2.2 (Cont'd) g. FOOT ROOM -Enough foot room is needed to allow the operator to get close to the board without leaning. A clearance of 4 inches vertically and 4 inches horizontally is recommended.

6.1.2.3 SIT-DOWN CONSOLE DIMENSIONS

a. CONSOLE HEIGHT TO SEE OVER b. c. (1) If the seated operator must see over the console, the console height should be no more than approximately 27 inches above the seat.to accommodate the 5th percentile adult female. ing seat height adjusted to 18 inches, maximum console height should therefore be 45 inches above the floor . (2) See-over console heights above 45 inches may be acceptable, for example, where the seated opera tor need only monitor (not read) status lights and ciators beyond the console, if they are at a suitable distance and height. CONTROL HEIGHT -All controls on a sit-down console should be within the reach radius of the 5th percentile fem ale. Measurements should be made using seated shoulder height wit!, the shoulder in line with the leading edge of the benchboard.

This is illustrated in Exhibit 6.1-9. BENCHBOARD SLOPE -The board slope, in conjunction with its depth, should be such that all controls are within the functional reach radius of the 5th percentile female (as strated in Exhibit 6.1-9) and all displays and markings can be read . 41 ~11 I 1 1,; /'/l/,1/1 D YES 0 NO 20001402 CPT 0 YES N/A N/A M YES Plant fications indicate a 5" horizontal clearance. TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS Ix HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 9 * ;'j &I Ill I # # I I , GUIDELINE "' . ~. 6.1.2.3 (Cont'd) d. CONTROL DISTANCE FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE. CONSOLE I (1) . I Controls should be set back a M YES minimum of 3 inches.from the front edge to protect against accidental activation. (2) Other controls may be mounted as M YES far. back as 25 inches from the console edge. This distance accommodates the extended func-tional reach of the 5th percentile as defined. e. DISPLAY POSITIONING (1) All displays, including annunciator M YES . tiles, should be mounted so that

• they are within the upper limit of the visual field -750 above the
• horizontal line of sight -of the 5th percentile female (see Exhibit 6.1-10). (2) In addition, all displays should be M YES mounted so that the angle from the line of sight to the display face plane is 450 or greater (see Exhibit 6.1-10). The 5th percen-tile female determines the upper limit. (Practically, there is no lower limit for a plausible
• sit-down console design.) f. LATERAL SPREAD OF CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS -(Exhibit 6.1-11) (1) For control and monitoring D YES *actions that must occur in sequ*ence, all necessary controls . and displays should be within the maximum extended reach and the viewing range of the seated operator from a, single reference point. **.
• 42 TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED Page 5 of 9 *

//7 7 i!I' --I<, I I ,I GUIDELINE If c;; ,\' 6.1.2.3f (Cont'd) (2) For the situation described in D YES item 1, above, and sustained or precise control action, the opera tor should be able to reach the controls without having to_ bend/stretch significantly.

g. LEG AND FOOT ROOM -Sufficient M YES leg and foot room should be provided to enable seated operators to avoid awk-ward and uncomfortable positions.

Exhibit 6.1-12 shows the dimensions involved and gives minimums and ranges necessary to accommodate the 5th to 95th percentiles (as defined in Exhibit 6.1-5). h. WRITING SPACE ON CONSOLES -Writing space may be needed by operators working at consoles.

• (1) An area at least 16 inches deep NIA NIA and 24 inches wide is recom-mended where these dimensions in the total configuration would fit operator reach capabilities.

Less space may be adequate consider-ing the frequency and duration of writing requirements at control room consoles. (2) If writing space is provided on the NIA *NIA console itself, it should not inter-' fere with viewing and manipu-lation of controls and displays. (3) If writing is necessary but space NIA NIA on the console is not available, other arrangements such as a nearby desk or table should be provided .

• 43 TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 9 * /JYJ / la I I . # ,;s ft: I I GUIDELINE c1 4li' ~.1.2.4 SIT-STAND WORK STATIONS a. CONTROL AND DISPLAY POSI-NIA NIA TIONING -The height and lateral " limits for controls and displays should conform to the guidelines given for stand-up consoles (Guideline 6.1.2.2).

b. CHAIR HEIGHT -The operator should NIA NIA be provided with a high chair so that the seated eye height is approximately the same as standing eye height. C, KNEE ROOM -Knee room and com-NIA NIA fortable foot support should be pro-vided: . 6.1.2.5 VERTICAL PANELS a. CONTROL HEIGHT (1) Controls should be placed in an M NO 20A03'oo2.

III-9 area between 34 inches and 70 20A03003 III-8

• inches above the floor . 22A03038 III-8 22A03054 III-8 22A030.64 CPT (2) Controls requiring precise or D NO See (1) frequent operation and emergency above controls should be placed in an , area between 34 inches and 53 inches above the floor. b. DISPLAY HEIGHT (1) Displays should be placed in an M NO 20A02001 CPT area between 41 inches and 70 20A02002 CPT inches above the floor. 20A02036 11-6 (2) Displays that must be read fre-D NO 20A02090 CPT quently or precisely should be 20A02416 CPT placed in an area between 50 . 22A02083 1-2 inches and 65 inches above the 22A02084 11-6 . floor. 22A02085 11-6 22A02086 11-5 22A02087 1-2 22A02088 11-5
• 44
• *
• TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS&.

HEDs GENERATED Page 7 or S I 1/ll;lt/ &UIDELINE /'/ / / , I I I ----------------**-----l-~(---l------if---+--------1

6.7.2 CATHODE

RAY TUBE (CRT) PLAYS 6.7.2.3 .OPERATOR-DISPLAY RELATION-SHIPS ' I a. b. c

• VIEWING DISTANCE -Viewing tance should be greater than 18 inches. VIEWING ANGLE -The minimum angle between the operator's actual line-of-sight (LOS) as measured from the operator's normal work station, and the plane of the display screen should be 45o or greater in either the horizontal or vertical direction.

See Exhibits 6.7-8 and 6.7-10. SCREEN LOCATION, SEA TED OPERATORS (1) CRT displays which require quent or continuous monitoring, or which may display important (e.g., alarm) information, should be located within the following limits as measured from the mal operator work station (see Exhibit 6. 7-9): (a) Horizontal limits -Not more than 35° to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b} Vertical limits -Not more than 20° above and 400 below the operator's horizontal LOS. (2) CRT displays which do not require frequent or continuous ing, and which will not display important (e.g., alarm} mation, should be located within the following limits . 45 M YES M YES N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NOTE: Angles for op. standing directly in front of benchboard are greater than 450. \\hen operator stands between benchboard and vertical panel, s/he has room to move back to make angle acceptable. Operators would not be seated when viewing the Surry CRT displays.

---

~--------

---

~

TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED _Page 8 of 9

• YJ&! I I r,, § s; 1/111 I GUIDELINE I Cl' 6.7.2.3c (Cont'd) (a) Horizontal limits -Not more than 950 to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits -Not more N/A N/A than 700 above and 900 below the operator's horizontal LOS. d. SCREEN LOCATION, STANDING OPERATORS (1) CRT displays which require fre-quent or continuous monitoring, or which may display important (e.g., alarm) information, should be located within the following limits as measured from the nor-mal operator work station: (a) Horizontal limits -Not more N/A N/A than 35° to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead
• LOS. (b) Vertical limits -Not more M YES than 350 above and 250 below D the operator's horizontal LOS. (2) CRT displays which do not require frequent or continuous monitor-ing, and which will not display important (e.g., alarm) infor-mation, should be located within fhe following limits (as measured from normal operator work stations which permit full operator head and eye rotation): (a) Horizontal limits -Not more M YES than 950 to the left or right of D the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits -Not more M YES than 850 above and 900 below D the operator's horizontal LOS .
• 46 TABLE 3-2 ANTHROPOMETRY SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED .Page 9 of 9 ,l!1 .... /J0 "!. la "'/ b I'¥ ~I-# *1 __________ G:.:U:;:ID;,:;EL::.;:IN;.:.E_....;_ _______ -l-_4_c. _ _,_ __ ~_~...;..§_f-___.;.t!f--jF----'-----, ' *

• 6. 'l .2.3d (Cont'd) e. f. MOUNTING IN CONSOLES -When CRTs are perm~nently mounted in con-soles, the console configuration, , dimensions, and type of use (suclvas seated, sit-stand, or standing) affects the CRT/operator interface.

Consoles in which CRTs are installed should form to the guidelines of Section 6.1.2. VISIBILITY OF DATA -All.data and messages on the CR'l' screen should be within the unobstructed view of .an operator at the normal work station.

• NIA NIA Not mounted in console.
• 0 YES 47
• *
• 3.3 illumination Survey This section documents the results of the illumination survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Surry CRDR Program Plan. 3.3.1 Objectives The objectives of the illuminat.ion survey were to: J a. Assess the degree to which the illumination levels under normal and emergency lighting in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify and document any characteristics of control room illumination that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

• 3.3.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the illumination characteristics in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700.

The illumination topics evaluated include:

• Illumination levels
• Unirormity of illumination levels
• Shadowing
• Glare
• Reflectance
• Color. 3.3.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 .paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.5.3a through h, and 6.1.5.4c.

The detailed definitions for each criteria are presented in Table 3-3.

• 3.3.4 Methods 3.3.4.1 Data Collection

a. Data collected during operator interviews were reviewed to identify CR areas having potential illumination problems.

b. Direct measurements of CR illumination were made. using a Tektronix digital photometer (Model J16} with illuminance probe (Model J6511}. All equipment had been recently calibrated by Leasametric, Inc

• 48
• *
• c. An illumination reading was taken at each control panel in the 'primary operating area as well as at the computer consoles (see Figures 3-3A and 3-3B}. Measurements were taken under normal lighting conditions.

Extant illumination levels were recorded on data sheets depicting the location at which the measurement was taken. All deviations from NUREG-0700 guidelines were noted and recorded. 3.3.4.2 Analysis -Data we.re analyzed according to the following procedure:*

a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports.

• Recorded information included the lighting source or affected components, a description of the problem including . the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or . more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c. Upon compledon of all analyses, the criteria of the illumination task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3.3.4 Findings

The findings of the illumination survey are presented in Table 3-3, "Illumination Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 11 criteria were applied to the displays in the Surry control room. Of those criteria, 6 (55%) were in compliance, and 5 (45%) were not in compliance. A total of* 4 HEDs were generated which document all of the 5 criteria that were not met. *In general, those HEDs address insufficient illumination levels in some areas, lack of uniformity in illumination levels, shadowing, and glare in the control room.

• Table 3-3 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section. 5.0 for an explanation of assessment category).

Note that "CPT"

• means co~plete and indicates that no further action needs to be .taken on an HED
• 49 c..n 0 * -:1 " 33 lI @ /;';\ BENCH BOARD '56' v::.I SECTION 1*2 35
• FRONT VERTICAL CONTROL BOARD SECTION 1-2 FIGURE 3*3A l@I UNIT 1 ILLUMINATION MEASUREMENTS CIRCLED READINGS ARE GIVEN IN FOOTCANDLES
• D D
• D D
• I .1 I I I I I I I lei I I @ e BENCH BOARD SECTION 2-1 FRONT VERICAL CONTROL BOARD SECTION 2*1 FIGURE 3-3B UNIT 2 ILLUMINATION MEASUREMENTS CIRCLED READINGS ARE GIVEN IN FOOTCANDLES
• @

TABLE 3-3 ILLUMINATION SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 o! 2

• 1///$1/1/

$ I I GUIDELINE " 6.1.5.3 ILLUMINATION.

a. LEVELS -(from Exhibit 6.1-22) M .NO 20000008 Ill-8 Numbers are the min-recommended-max in ftC. (1) Panels, primary 20-30-50 (2) Aux panels 20-30-50 (3) Scale indicators 20-30-50 (4) Seated operations 50-75-100 (5) Reading, handwriting 50-75-100 (6) Reading, print 20-30-50 (7) Writing 50-75-100 (8) Maintenance 20-30-50 (9) Emergency operations

-as above for area/task .

• b. UNIFORMITY

-The level of 0 YES illumination should not vary greatly over a given work station. c. SUPPLEMENTAL IJGHT -. 0 YES Supplemental lighting should be provided for personnel performing specialized visual tasks in areas where fixed illumination is not adequate.

d. TASK AREA LUMINANCE RATIOS -I NO* 20000014 Ill-8 To determine task lighting requirements, it is necessary to consider the levels of lighting which surround a task. Great disparities between task and background lighting can lead to adaptation problems.

To ensure effective visual performance, the task area luminance ratios in Exhibit 6.1-23 should not be exceeded .

• 52 TABLE 3-3 ILLUMINATION SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 2
• i'j~/ 1/ I '" It s: Co , " . I GUIDELINE I it 6.1.5.3 (Cont'd) e. SHADOWING

-To reduce operator I NO 20000014 111-8 fatigue and eyestrain, shadows should be avoided. (1) Ambient illumination should be 0 YES provided via indirect or diffuse lighting. (2) Labels, instructions, and other 0 YES written information should not be in shadowed positions.

f. GLARE -Glare should not interfere I NO 20000014 III-8 with the readability of displays, labels, 0 20000009 II-6 or indicators.

g. REFLECTANCE

-The amount of 0 YES reflected light is affected by illuminated surface colors. Reflectance should conform to the recommendations shown in Exhibit 6.1-24. (See also Exhibit 6.1-25.) h. COLOR -Surface colors should be I NO 20000003 III-8 recognizable under both normal and emergency lighting conditions. 6.1.5.4 EMERGENCY LIGHTING c. LIGHTING LEVELS -The control M YES room emergency illumination system should be designed to provide a minimum illumination level of 10 footcandles at all work stations in the primary operating area. I ,* ** 53 ,. *

• 3.4 Ambient Noise Survey This section documents the results of the ambient noise survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Surry CRDR Program Plan. 3.4.1 Objectives The objectives of the ambient .noise survey were to: A . a. Assess the degree to which the ambient noise in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify*

and document any features of the ambient noise in the control room that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.4.2 Scope

The scope of the survey extends to the assessment of the ambient noise in the mairi control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:

• Auditory environment
• Background noise
• Noise distractions.

3.4.3 Criteria

The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.5.Sa through e. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-4C. 3.4.4 Method 3.4.4.1 Procedure Preparation and Conduct -The procedure employed in the conduct of this task was as*follows:

a. The results of the operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problems with ambient noise levels in the CR. b. Data were collected using methods and procedures consisting of tions, measurements, questionnaires and interviews

• 54
• c. All measurements were made using a Gen Rad Model 1982 noise meter . and probe calibrated prior to data collections.

Noise was measured in dB on the A-scale for weighted averages and the following octaves (in Hz):

• 31.5
• 63
• 125
• 250
• 500
• 1000
• 2000
• 4000
• 8000
• 16000 Figures 3-4A and 3-4B indicate the control room locations where noise measurements were taken. The reactor was at power, and approximately 10 people (including the data collectors) were in the control room. The survey was taken during the day shift. 3.4.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the fallowing procedure:

a. b. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the noise source involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

The data collection method was also recorded on the HED from. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the ambient noise task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3.4.5 Findings

Tables 3-4A and 3-4B present the ambient noise data measured and documented

• during data collection.

The findings of the ambient noise survey are presented in Table 3-4C "Ambient Noise Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 5 criteria were applied to the ambient noise in the Surry control room. Of those criteria, 1 .(20%) was in compliance, and 4 (80%) were not in compliance. A total of 5 HEDs were generated which document all of the 4 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address background noise levels and noise distractions. 55

• D 0 © 0 0 FIGURE 3-4A UNIT 1 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
• -[ (0 I I I
• * *-TABLE 3-4A NOISE SURVEY RECORD PLANT/UNIT:

SURRY /UNIT -1 SHEET NO. __ l __ qF __ 2 __ MEASUREMENTS MADE BY:-~D.:... -=S~E~IB,:.:;E;.:.:.R..:..T ________ .....;_ ______________________ _ SOUND LEVEL METER M0DEL: __ G_EN_R_AD_1_98_2 _____________________________ _ SERIAL N0.: _ __..._5......_ ________________________ CALIBRATION DATE: ___ 3._/4 .... / .... 8 ..... 5 ____ _ MICROPHONE TYPE:_ .... R,;:.A;.;.;.N:;.,;DO~M.:....;.;IN~C;.;.1.:;,;DE:;.;.N.;.;;;C.;;:.E ________________ sERIAL NO.:------------ ACCESSORIES; ____ P_RE_-_AM_P-',_WI_N_D_SC_R_E_EN ______________________________ _ SLOW RESPONSE MODE. db RANGE 30-80 SOUND LEVEL (db) DATE TIME NOISE CONDITION/ MEASUREMENT OCTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCY (Hz) REMARKS SIGNAL SOURCE LOCATION -IMPACT/ .D 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 K,()Oll IMPULSE "Cl 3/4/85 1930 BACKGROUND 1 65 67 67 66 62 62 58 54 50 49 54 MAX OF 71 dbA 3/4/8~ 1940 BACKGROUND 2 68 71 72 66 64 65 60 63 56 45 56 MAX OF 76 dbA 3/4/85 1945 BACKGROUND 3 66 68 64 67 62 64 55 54 50 49 54 MAX OF 76 dbA 3/4/85 1950 BACKGROUND 4 67 70 66 65 62 63 69 60 48 44 54 MAX OF 76 dbA 3/4/85 1955 BACKGROUND 5 65 67 70 64 64 61 56 56 57 47 59 TALKING NEARBY MAX OF 81 dbA 3/4/8~ 2000 BACKGROUND 6 67 66 72 67 63 64 59 54 49 45 47 3/4/8~ 2005 BACKGROUND 7 65 72 66 65 62 59 58 52 53 60 70 MAX OF 87 dbA

• * *-TABLE 3-4A NOISE SURVEY RECORD PLANT/UNIT:

SURRY /UNIT-1 SHEET N0. __ 2 __ OF __ 2 __ . MEASUREMENTS MADE BY:.,.. _D_. _S_E_IB_E_R_T _______________________________ _ SOUND LEVEL METER MODEL: __ GE_N_RA_D_l 9_8_2 _____________________________ _ SERIAL N0.: __ 0_5_5_9 ______________________ _... CALIBRATION DATE: ___ 3_/4_/_8_5 ___ _ MICROPHONE TYPE: _ _.8 .... 8 .... N .... PQ .... M.._...IN .... C...,I .... PE .... N..,.C.-E ________________ SERIAL NO.:------------ ACCESSORIES: ___ .;..P;..;.;RE_-.;..;A;..;.;MP~.;..;.;WI-N;.;;.D.;;..SC-R.;.;;E.;;..EN;..;_ _____________________________ _ SLOW RESPONSE MODE db RANGE 30-80 SOUND LEVEL (db) DATE TIME NOISE CONDITION/ MEASUREMENT OCTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCY (Hz) REMARKS SIGNAL SOURCE LOCATION IMPACT/ .D 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 9'000 IMPULSE "O 3/4/8~ 2010 BACKGROUND 8 68 72 70 65 61 63 64 57 58 43 40 MAX OF 80 dbA

• * *-D D ---------------------

0 @ © J © 0 0 I I I I I I ]

• I I FIGURE 3-48 UNIT 2 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS

0) 0 * * *-TABLE 3-48 NOISE SURVEY RECORD PLANTIUNIT:

SURRY /UNIT-2 SHEET NO. __ l __ OF__;...._ 2 __ MEASUREMENTS MADE BY: _ _;;..D.;.....;;.S.;;;..;EI;..;;B~E.:..:.RT.;.._ ______________________________ _ SOUND LEVEL METER MODEL: ____ G_EN_R __ AD_1_98_2 _____________________________ _ SERIAL N0.: _ ___;0~5~5.;..9 ______________________ CALIBRATION DATE: __ _,3/ ..... 4..._/_85 ____ _ MICROPHONE TYPE: _____ RA __ N __ D __ OM ____ I_N_C I __ D-E_NC_E _______________ SERIAL NO.:-------------- ACCESSORIES: _____ P-R-E-_A-M-P_W_I_N.;;...DS-C_R_EE_N _____________________________ _ SLOW RESPONSE MODE db RANGE 30-80 '* SOUND LEVEL (db) DATE TIME NOISE CONDITION# MEASUREMENT OCTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCY (Hz) REMARKS SIGNAL SOURCE LOCATION IMPACT/ .a 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 l&,000 IMPULSE "O 3/4/8 1 1720 BACKGROUND 1 89 75 69 68 66 63 60 61 58 62 72 DOOR CLOSING 3/4/8 1 1730 BACKGROUND 2 69 75 69 65 68 70 69 66 55 60 70 MAX OF 81 dbA 3/4/8 1 1735 BACKGROUND 3 73 71 66 64 65 64 62 54 54 62 71 3/4/8! 1740 BACKGROUND 4 71 73 63 67 62 60 61 57 53 60 71 3/4/8~ 1750 BACKGROUND 5 69 71 65 62 62 63 62 56 50 49 54 MAX OF 70 dbA 3/4/8! 1800 BACKGROUND 6 68 72 67 62 62 59 57 55 49 45 54 MAX OF 83 dbA 3/4/8 1 1805 BACKGROUND 7 69 70 64 63 60 67 59 53 57 51 54 MAX OF 85 dbA

• *
• TABLE 3-4B NOISE SURVEY RECORD PLANTIUNIT:

__ s_UR_R_v_1u_N_I_T_-2 ________________________ SHEET N0. __ 2 __ 0F 2 MEASUREMENTS MADE BY: _ _...;;D;..;.._S=E;;.::I.::;.B;;;.;ER.:....:T ______________________________ _ SOUND LEVEL METER MODEL: __ G.;;;..;E;;.;.N;....;.;;RA..;.;;D~l9;..;8;.;;;2 _______________________________ _ SERIAL N0.: __ 0 ...... 5 __ 5 __ 9 _______________________ CALIBRATION DATE: __ 3_./ __ 4.._/8 __ 5 ____ _ MICROPHONE TYPE: ----=RA.:.:.N=D.:.:.:9M..:-.:.I.:.:.NC=I:..::D.,_EN:.:.:C;;..::E,_ ____________ $ERIAL NO.:------------ ACCESSORIES: ______ P_R_E-_A_M_P_W_I_ND_S_C_R_EE_N ___________________________ _ SLOW RESPONSE MODE db RANGE 30-80 SOUND LEVEL (db) DATE TIME NOISE CONDITION/ MEASUREMENT OCTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCY (Hz) REMARKS SIGNAL SOURCE LOCATION . cl IMPACTI -..0 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 11,00lll IMPULSE 'O --*, 13/4/85 1815 BACKGROUND 8 73 75 67 62 77 77 61 54 51 50 56 MAX OF 81 dbA 3/4/85 1905 BACKGROUND 9 63 74 69 63 62 61 57 55 54 50 54 MAX OF 81 dbA ~/4/85 1910 BACKGROUND 10 64 67 65 63 60 58 62 57 57 48 54 3/4/85 1915 BACKGROUND 11 68 73 70 64 63 59 56 61 48 47 54

• *
• Table 3-4C also includes that category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section 5.0 for an explanation of assessment category).

Note that the category "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED . 62 TABLE 3-4C AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 1 * ~~bl /// I # ;: # I I GUIDELINE q $ q: 6.1.5.5 AUDITORY ENVIRONMENT -The acoustic design of the control room should ensur'e that verbal communic.ations between operators are not impaired; auditory signals are readily detected; and audito*ry distrac-tion, irritation, and fatigue of operators are minimized.

a. BACKGROUND NOISE -Background M NO 20000010 II-5 noise should not impair verbal com I 20000012 II-5 munication between any two points in the primary operating area. Verbal communications between these points should be intelligible using normal or slightly raised _voice levels. b. LIMIT. -Background noise levels* M NO 20000011 CPT* should not exceed 65 dB(A). c. FURTHER REDUCTIONS

-Further* I NO 20000004 II-5 reductions in background noise may be required where communications between the primary operating* area and

• other control room lo.cations are neces-sary and voice tl:'ansmission systems are not provided.

d. NOISE DISTRACTIONS

-Noise dis-I NO 20000004 II-5

• tractions generated either inside or I 20000005 CPT outside the control room should be minimized.

e. REVERBERATION TIME AND SOUND M YES ABSORPTION

-The acoustical treat-ment of the control room should limit reverberation time to one second or less . ** 63

• *
• 3.5 Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Survey This section documents the results of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HV AC) survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.5.1 Objectives The objectives of the HVAC survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which the HV AC in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify and document any features of the HVAC that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.5.2 Scope

The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the HV AC in the main control room at the Surry Power Station using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:

• Temperature and humidity
• Ventilation.

3.5.3 Criteria

The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.5.la and b and 6.L5.2a and b. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-5. 3.5.4 Method 3. 5. 4.1 Data Collection

a. All required data forms, plant documentation, engineering drawings, equipment, and materials were made available prior to conduct of this task. Permission was obtained for all required access to the control room. b. Data were collected using methods and procedures consisting of vations, measurements, and document reviews

• 64
• *
• c . Plant documentation was reviewed to verify the items listed in the Document Review Checklist in HV AC task plan. The required plant documents include:
• Historical data
• HV AC system specifications
• Plant temperature and humidity.

3.5.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:

a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the system involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the HV AC task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3.5.5 Findings

The findings of the HV AC survey are presented in Table 3-5 "HVAC Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, four criteria were applied to the HVAC systems in the Surry control room. Of those criteria, one (25%) was in compliance, and three (75%) were not in compliance. A total of four HEDs were generated which document all of the three criteria which were not met. In general, those HEDs address control room temperature variability, maintenance of comfortable temperatures, and draft control in the primary opera ting area. Table 3-5 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that ."CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED . 65

---

~-----~-TABLE 3-5 HY AC SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 1

• V// /// I i! # <:i I ii GUIDELINE " c1 4l' 6.1.5.1 TEMPERA TORE AND HUMIDITY a. COMFORT ZONE -The climate con-M NO 20000006 III-9 trol system should be capable of 20000013 IIl-9 maintaining temperature and~humidity within the shaded area com(ort zone shown in Figure 8-1. b. TEMPERATURE DIFFERENTIAL

-I NO 20000002 III-9 Air temperature at floor level and at head level should not differ by more than lOOF. 6.1.5.2 VENTILATION

a. AIR QUANTITY -The ventilation I YES system should be capable of introducing outdoor air into the control room at a rate of at at least 15 cubic feet per minute (cfm) per occupant.

b. AIR VELOCITY -Air velocities in the I NO 20000002 IIl-9 primary operating area should not 20000007 III-9

• exceed 45 feet per minute (fpm) measured at operator head level and should not produce a noticeable draught.
• 66
• *
• 3.6 Emergency Equipment Survey This section documents the results of the emergency equipment survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.6.1 Objectives The objectives of the emergency equipment survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which the emergency equipment in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0'100.
• b. Identify and document any features of the emergency equipment that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.6.2 Scope

The scope of the effort extended to the assessment of the emergency equipment in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:

• Operators' protective equipment
• Fire, radiation, and rescue equipment
• Emergency equipment storage
• Emergency lighting
• Emergency communications
• Operator compatibility with emergency gear. 3.6.3 *Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.4.la through i, 6.1.4.2a through e, 6.1.4.3a and b, 6.1.5.4a and b, 6.2.1.Sa through c(3), 6.4.1.ld.

The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-6

• 67
• *
• 3.6.4 Method 3.6.4.1 Data Collection

a. Data were collected using operator interviews and the checklists tained in the emergency equipment task plan. b. The emergency equipment evaluated was limited to equipment stored in immediate proximity to the primary operating area, specifically: tective clothing, breathing apparatus and air packs. c. CR operators experienced in the use of the emergency equipment were observed donning and doffing the equipment.

The operators were instructed to describe any problems encountered while using the ment. Comments were noted and recorded. 3.6.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the following procedure: . a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the ment involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c

• Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the emergency ment task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3.6.5 Findings

The findings of the emergency equipment survey are presented in Table 3-6, "Emergency Equipment Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 25 criteria were applied to the emergency equipment in the Surry control room. Of these, 2 (8%) were not applicable, 11 (44%) were in compliance, and 12 (48%) were not in compliance. Eleven HEDs were generated which document the 12 criteria that were not met. In general, the HEDs address the compatibility of the emergency equipment with operator sizes, the availability, accessibility, and orderly storage of the equipment, and adequate emergency communications capabilities. Table 3-6 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPTII stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED

• 68 TABLE 3-6 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 3
• j'j&/ I I § I I GUIDELINE " c1 <t' 6.1.4.1 OPERATOR PROTECTIVE EQUIP-MENT a. TYPES OF EQUIPMENT

-.Protective 0 YES No requirement equipment should include protective for protective clothing and breathing apparatus. clothing -per station SOP. b. ANTHROPOMETRY -Protective I NO 20000503 UI-9 clothing and breathing equipment 20000501 111-9 should be compatible with operator 20000202 11-7 body sizes and tasks to provide ade-quate tactile sensitivity and ability to see, reach, move, communicate, and hear. c. PERIODIC CHECKS -Operator pro-D YES tective equipment should be periodi-cally checked to determine if it is in good condition.

d. QUANTITY -. There should be pro-I !NO 20000501

• III-9 tective equipment available in
• sufficient quantities and sizes for the required number of operators:

e. MARKING Protective clothing sizes N/A IN/A should be clearly identifiable.

f. EXPENDABLES

-There should be an 0 !YES adequate supply of personal protection equipment expendables, such as filters. g. ACCESSIBILITY -All protective I ~o 20000504 CPT equipment should be easily and readily accessible.

h. .'.!'RAINING

-Operators should be well I ~o 20000502 CPT practiced in donning protective equip-ment. i. PROCEDURES -Instructions for don-NIA 'NIA Handled in ning, doffing, and controlling personal training protective equipment should be provided . * *, 69 TABLE 3-6 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 2 or 3 * ~/ I I $ "' I ,I I # IIUIDELINE . 6.1.4.2 FIRE, RADIATION, AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT*

a. PERIODIC CHECKS -All equipni'ent I YES should be periodically checked to deter-C mine if it is in good condition.

b. ACCF.S.,IBILITY

-All equipment I NO 20000504 CPT should be easily and readily accessible.

c. TRAINING -Operators should be D YES trained in the use of all emergency equipment.

d. PROCEDURES

-There should be a D YES written, administratively approved procedure for each type of emergency or combination of emergencies.

e. AUTOMATIC WARNING SYSTEM -0 YES There should be an automatic fire warning system for control room fires.

• 6.1.4.3 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT STOR-AGE a. PROPER STORAGE -Provision should I NO 20000501 III-9 be made for the orderly storage, in the control room, of emergency equipment that is needed by control room person-neL b. ACCESS -The storage location(s) may 0 NO 20000501 III-9 be away from the primary operating area but should be accessible, clearly marked, and known to all personnel.

6.1.5.4 EMERGENCY LIGHTING a. AUTOMATIC ACTION -A control 0 YES room emergency lighting system should be automatically activated and immedi-a tely available upon failure or the nor-mal control room lighting system. This system should be independent or any other plant lighting system that is available in the control room .

• 70 TABLE 3-6 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SURVEY FINDINGS~

HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 3 * ~&7 I. I I; i! I GUIDELINE " ~, t! Ct' 6.1.5.4 EMERGENCY LIGHTING (cont'd) b. OPERABILITY -Failure of the normal 0 YES control room lighting system should not degrade operability of the emergency lighting system. 6.2.1.8 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

a. BACKUP EQUIPMENT

-Provisions I NO 20000203 II-7 should be made to assure complete 20000204 II-7 internal and external communications 20000205 II-7 capabilities during emergencies 20000206 II-7 20000207 II-7 20000212 Il-7 -b. EQUIPMENT USABILITY -Communi-I NO 20000202 II-7 cations equipment should be usable by personnel wearing protective gear with-out impediment to their tasks. C, VOICE COMMUNICATIONS WITH MASKS * (1) Emergency face masks should be I NO 20000202 II-7 equipped with diaphragms that are specially designed to transmit speech. (2) The diaphragms should be able to I NO 20000202 II-7 separate voice from exhaust valve action. (3) If not equipped with diaphragms, I NO 20000202 Il-7 masks should be equipped with electronic speech systems which pick up the voice with an internal microphone and transmit it to a loudspeaker attached outside the mask. 6.4.1.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES

d. COMPATIBILITY WITH EMERGENCY GEAR -If used while wearing protec-tive equipment (e.g., oxygen masks, protective gloves), controls should be: *, (1) Easy to identify.

I YES (2) Easy to activate. I YES

• 71
• *
• 3. 7 Maintainability Survey This section documents the results of the maintainability survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3. 7 .1 Objectives I The objectives of the maintairiability survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which components with
• integral lighting are operator-maintainable as defined in NUREG-0700.

b. Assess the degree to which display failures are recognizable by the operator as defined in NUREG-0700.

c. Assess to what degree spare parts, operating expendables and special tools are available and adequate.

for use by the operator during operator maintenance activities as defined in NUREG-0700.

b. To identify and document any features in the control room operator maintainability design that do. not conform to the criteria defined in NUREG-700.

3.7.2 Scope

The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of control room design features defined as maintenance performed by the operators in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The ability topics evaluated include:

• Spare parts
• Opera ting expendables
• Tools
• General requirements for voice communications systems
• Lamp replacement of annunciator panels
• Provisions for lamp failure on legend and nonlegend indicator lights
• Characteristics and problems of indicator lights
• General characteristics of graphic recorders.

The Maintainability Survey did not address the general control room or plant design for maintainability

• 72
• 3. 7 .3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.1.5a through f, 6.2.1.lb, 6.3.31c(l) through (3), 6.4.3.3c(l) through (4), 6.5.3.la(l) through (3) and c(2), 6.5.4.le and f. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-7. 3.7.4 Method 3. 7.4.1 Data Collection

a. Data were collected using operator interviews and the checklist tained in the maintainability task plan. b. Since operating experience was required to ass~ss compliance with the

• various maintainability guidelines, the necessary data were collected through interviews of CR operators.

c. All discrepancies were noted and recorded.

3. 7.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:

a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the ment involved (e.g., bulbs, chart paper, inking pens, etc.), a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the maintainability task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3. 7 .5 Findings The findings of the maintainability survey are presented in Table 3-7, ability Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 20 criteria were applied in .the maintainability survey in the Surry control room. . Of those criteria, 7 (35%) were in compliance, and 13 (65%) were not in compliance.

A total of 6 HEDs were generated which document all of the 13 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address

• the lack of expendables or spare parts in the control room, storage, inventory, lamp test, and lamp replacement.

Table 3-7 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" means complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED. 73 TABLE 3-7 MAINTAINABIIJTY SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 or 3

• jtj~/ 7 7 J! $ " # {I g {I it GUIDELINE

1. c! ., 6.1.1.5 SPARE PARTS, OPERATING EXPENDABLES, AND TOOLS a. SUPPLY -There shouid be an ade-I NO 20000109 III-9 quate supply of expendables and spare 20A00115 CPT parts: fuses, bulbs, ink and inking pens, recorder charts, printer paper, etc b. ~CCESSIBIIJTY

-Expendables and I NO 20000109 III-9 spare parts should be readily accessible.

c. TOOLS -All necessary or special I NO 20000016 III-9 replacement tools needed to install 20000110 IIl-9 expendables and spare parts should be available.

d. . STORAGE SP ACE -There should be I NO 20000015 III-9 adequate storage space for expendables and spare parts. e. CODING -When different types, I NO 20000015 III-9 sizes, or styles of expendables and spare parts are required, they should be

• clearly and distinctively marked to avoid misapplication.

f. INVENTORY

-Records should be kept as to the status of expendables and spare parts. I NO 20000109 III-9 6.2.1.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR VOICE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS b. PERIODIC MAINTENANCE TESTS -I NO 20A00213 Il-7 These should be performed on all com-munication systems to ensure that the system is normally operative and effective under changes in ambient noise levels that may have occurred since the last check. *,

• 74 TABLE 3-7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 3 * ~/. /// I # ;::; # ;! I I ii GUIDELINE II -\' 4l 6.3.3.1 VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS c. LAMP REPLACEMENT (1) If a lamp replacement requires I YES Procedurally legend tile removal, there should controlled be a way to ensure that the tile is replaced in the correct location. (2) Lamp replacement should not I NO 20000110 Ill-9 subject the opera tor to a shock hazard. (3) Operator aids should be provided I NO 20000110 lll-9 if needed for lamp replacement. 6.4.3.3 LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS

c. PROVISION FOR LAMP FAIL URE . (1) A lamp test or dual lamp/dual 0 NO 20A01216 II-6 filament capability should be provided . * (2)

• Lamps within the pushbutton I YES should be replaceable from the front of the panel. (3) Legend pushbuttons should not I YES short out during lamp replace-ment or be susceptible to inad-vertent activation during the process of lamp removal or replacement.

(4) Legend covers should be keyed to l YES Procedurally prevent the possibility of inter-controlled changing the covers. 6.5.3.1 CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS

a. PRECAUTIONS TO ASSURE .* AVAILABILITY (1) Dual-bulb or dual-filament light I YES assemblies should be used .

• 75 TABLE 3-7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 3

• 7 I " /J # *~ I! # , GUIDELINE

• ct' 6.5.3.1 CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS (Cont'd) a. PRECAUTIONS TO ASSURE AVAILABILITY (Cont'd) I I (2) Bulb-test capability should be 0 NO 20A01216 II-6 provided.

(3) Design should encourage immedi-I YES ate replacement of burned-out bulbs by providing for rapid and convenien~ bulb replacement with power on and without hazard to personnel or equipment.

c. PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID MISINTER-PRETATION (2) Provisions (design or procedural)

I YES Procedurally should be made to prevent inter-controlled changing indicator lenses.

• 6.5.4.1 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS

e. ' AVAILABILITY OF EXPENDABLES I NO 20000015 III-9 Paper, ink, and other operator-maintained expendables should be provided and accessible in the control . room. f. EASE OF ROUTINE REPLENISH-I NO 20000015 III-9 MENT -Recorder design should permit quick and easy replenishment of paper and ink. *. *, ..

• 76
• *
• 3.8 Communications Survey This section docu~ents the results of the communications survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Surry CRDR Program Plan. 3.8.1 Objectives The objectives of the communications survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which the communication*

systems in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify and document any features of the communication systems that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.8.2 Scope

The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the communications survey design* in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include: *

• Requirements for voice communications
• Conventional-powered telephone systems
• Walkie-talkie transceivers
• Announcing systems
• Intercom system
• Emergency communications
• Auditory signals
• Signal meanings
• Auditory coding techniques
• Signal intensity
• Reliability of auditory alarms. 3.8.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.3.lb; 6.2.1.lc(l) and (2); 6.2.1.2a through e; 6.1.1.3a through e; 6.2.1.4a through e; 6.2.1.Sa through c; 6.2.l.6a through f; 6.2.1. 7a and b; 6.2.1.8a through c; 6.2.2.la through c; 6.2.2.2a through c; 6.2.2.3a through e; 6.2.24a and b; 6.2.2.4a and b; 6.2.2.Sa and b; 6.2.2.6a through c; 6.2.2. 7a through c. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-8 . 77
• *
• 3.8.4 Method 3.8.4.1 Data Collection

a. The results of the operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problem areas in the design and/or operation of the various Surry communications systems.

• b. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the cations task plan. Data were collected primarily through direct tion of the performance characteristics (e.g., intelligibility) of the various communications,.'

As necessary, system documents (e.g., cal specifications for public address system) were reviewed to augment or corroborate observations. 3.8.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the fallowing procedure:

a. All deviations from the criteria*

were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the system involved (e.g., Gai-Tronics system, telephone system, meters, chart recorders, etc.), a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED farm. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c

• Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the communications task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.
• 3.8.5 Findings The findings of the communications survey are presented in Table 3-8, "Communications Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 87 criteria were applied to the communications systems in the Surry control room. Of these, 14 (16%) were not applicable, 57 (66%) were in compliance and 16 (18%) were not in compliance.

A total of 12 HEDs were generated which document all the 16 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address communications problems, telephone cords in traffic paths, and annunciator alarms which are not directional. Table 3-8 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" means complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED

• 78 TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS &. HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 12
• J1j
• I ~/// ;::: I! # . GUIDELINE " ;:r 6.1.3.1 UNIT INTEGRATION AND INTER-FERENCE b. SENIOR OPERATOR STATION -0 NO 20001402 CPT Senior operators who supervise and assist operations of more than one unit need to be stationed so that they can communicate effectively with opera-tors in each unit and have an unob-structed visual path to the control boards of each unit. 6.2.1.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR VOICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS c. EMERGENCY MESSAGES (1) OUTGOING -Priority I NO 20000204 II-7 procedures should be established 20000205 II-7 for the transmission of emergency 20000206 II-7 messages from the control room 20000207 II-7
• by any of the communication 20000212 II-7 systems. (2) INCOMING -Procedures should I NO 20000204 II-7 be established for handling corn-20000205 II-7 munications during an emergency 20000206 II-7 and these procedures must be 20000207 II-7 known by all operators.

20000212 II-7 6.2.1.2 CONVENTIONAL-POWERED TELE-PHONE SYSTEMS a. FREQUENCY RESPONSE -The I NO 20000204 II-7 Standard powered telephone system must provide commercial -good frequency response in that portion equipment; but of the auditory spectrum most essential line is noisy. for intelligibility. Standard telephone bandpass is acceptable (200-3300 Hz). b. HANDSETS -Design should incor-poi'at:e the following features: (1) Size and shape should be compati-0 [YES ble with operator's hand size and mouth-ear distance (standard telephone dimensions acceptable) .

• 79
• *
• TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 12 GUIDELINE 6.2.1.2 b.(Cont'd)

(2) Should maintain firm ear contact by receiver while transmitter is positioned to receive voice waves directly from mouth. (3) Cords should be of nonkink or self-retracting type. (4) Cords should be of sufficient length to permit reasonable operator mobility. (5) Cords should be positioned so as to avoid entangling critical con-trols or endangering passing traf-fie. (6) Vertically mounted handset cradles should be designed and located to prevent the handset from being knocked out of the cradle by passing traffic . (7) Where multiple telephone instru-ments are located close together (e.g., on a single desk) they should be coded to indicate circuit or function. (8) If a press-to-talk button is used, the button should be convenient to both left and right hand opera-tion. c. SWITCiilNG MECHANISM -d. (1) Switching should be designed and/or programmed to minimize delay in making desired tioI')s under both normal and emergency conditions. (2) Switching should be programmed to give the control room ma tic priority of access to the switching system. TELEPHONE RINGING -Loudness of ringing should be adjustable at the vidual telephone instrument. 80 Ii~ ~I. la I I; § !5 ;.; I I 15! q $~ $ 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES NO N/A *, 0 YES I # 6 " - TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 3 or 12 i// ~* '" 8 I I $/ I # &UIDELIIIE 6.2.1.2 (Cont'd) e. ANNOUNCING USE -When transmit-0 YES

• ters, within the powered telephone system, are used as the microphone input to the announcing system, the transmitter should be compatible with the rest of the announcing system. 6.2.1.3 SOUND-POWERED TELEPHONE SYSTEMS a. SOUND QUALITY -Within engineer-ing constraints imposed by sound-powering, the system should provide: (1) Good frequency response in the 0 YES band from 200 to 3300 Hz (stan-dard telephone quality).

(2) In-phase feedback to the user. 0 YES b. HEADSETS -Headsets should reflect the following design requirements:

• (1) Earphone cushioning to provide I NO 20000205 Il-7 comfort for extended periods of wear. Earphones should cover the outer ear but without causing uncomfortable pressure.

(2) Supporting structure for earpieces 0 YES should not impose discomforts of weight, concentrated pressures, or metal contact with the skin. (3) The earpiece should be held 0 YES firmly in place, yet be easy to remove. (4) Ideally, headsets should provide I NO 20000205 11-7 hands-free operation. This may have to be compromised, how-ever, to accommodate a push-to-talk switch in anticipation of possible use in areas of high ambient noise .

• 81 TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&.

HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 12 * ~-7 7 I $ # # GUIDELINE " ~, {I 6.2.1.3b {Cont'd) {5) Biaural headsets should be avail-N/J. NIA Battery able for use by control room per-powered sonnel when they are required to radios leave the control room for plant areas with high ambient noise levels and communicate with the control room from these areas using sound-powered communi-cation equipment. (6) A well-marked and accessible NIA NIA place should be provided for head-set stowage. c. RINGING-(1) Need for ringing must be deter-NIA NIA mined for the individual plant depending on the sound-powered phone procedures.

• (2) If ringing is not installed, then the 0 YES user should be provided capability for directly switching the sound-powered transmitter to the paging system so that a desired party can be called to the line. d. JACK PROVISIONS

-(1) Plug-in jacks for the sound-0 YES powered system should be pro-* vided within the control room. (2) Jacks should be located close to 0 YES the work stations to prevent need for unduly long cords. (3) Jacks should not accommodate 0 YES plugs of the conventionally powered phone system, in order to avoid wrong instrument-system connections.

e. SWITCillNG-(1) The requirements for switching NIA NIA must be assessed for the individual plant depending on procedures for use of sound-* powered phones

• 82 TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 12
• I& I I § § I , I , &UIOELINE

1. " 6.2.1.3 e. (Cont'd) (2) Patch panels, when used, should N/A NIA be conspicuously marked and located in reasonably accessible places. These requirements are particularly critical in back-panel areas. (3) A complete set of cords should be N/A N/A provided at each panel if cord-type patching is used. 6.2.1.4 WALKIE-TALKIE TRANSCEIVERS

a. SOUND QUALITY -Within the engi-neering constraints imposed by radio frequency spectrum availability and by design for easy portability, walkie-talkies should realize the same quality desired throughout all of the com muni-cations systems, namely: * (1) Good frequency response, prefer-0 YES ably to telephone standards of 200 to 3300 Hz. (2) Sufficient dynamic range and gain 0 YES to handle instantaneous pressures found in speech and develop necessary signal level at the headphone or loudspeaker.

b. AREA COVERAGE -(1) Modulation and a radio frequency I NO 20000206 II-7 should be chosen, as FCC regu-lations permit, to provide broad-area walkie-talkie communication to the control room. One consid-era tion for frequency selection should be radio-wave penetration of metal or reinforced concrete barriers, which at certain fre-quencies would tend to attenuate or bounce the signaL

• 83 TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 12

• 0&/ /1/ I # ;:s {I I I GUIDELINE " ..... <Iii' 6.2.l.4b (Cont'd) (2) Use of walkie-talkies should be 0 YES prohibited in areas close to low_. level analog or digital $1quipment unless EMI noise susceptibility tests have been conducted that demonstrate that equipment is not affected by the frequency bands used. c. PACKAGING-(1) To the ex:tent permitted by design 0 YES for effective electrical/RF func-tion, walkie-talkies should be small, light, and easy to carry. (2) Their use should leave one hand, 0 YES .and preferably both; available most of the time for other tasks. (3) The microphone should be inte-0 YES
• grated into the transceiver pack-age. d. PARTY IDENTIFICATION

-When 0 YES there are more than two parties on a channel operating at separate locations, procedures must provide for unambig-uous identification of the speaker. e. BATTERY REPLENISHMENT-(1) A supply of fresh replacement 0 YES batteries should be stowed in an. accessible, well-marked space. (2) The stock should be kept large 0 YES enough to support long periods of continuous operation in case of eme,rgency .

• 84 TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 12 * ;j&/ I I I; $ I I I $~ I , &UIDELINE 6.2.1.S FIXED-BASE UHF TRANSCEIVERS

a. . SIGNAL QUALITY -Unlike walkie-I NO 20000212 ll-7 talkies, fixed-base UHF transceivers are not constrained by being designed for portability.

Therefore, they should readily achieve good voice intelligi-bility, provided by adequate frequency response at least within telephone standards of 200 to 3300 Hz. They should exhibit sufficient dynamic range to handle instantaneous pressures found in speech and develop sufficient gain to develop the necessary signal level at the loudspeaker.

b. GAIN -Gain should be adjustable, but 0 YES the gain control should be limited so D that even at its lowest setting an aud-ible signal is still presented.

c. PROCEDURES

-Procedures should be 0 YES established (and conspicuously posted) D

• for use of the system . 6.2.1.6 ANNOUNCING SYSTEMS a. INTELLIGIBILITY AND COVERAGE -(1) Intelligibility requires the inte-0 YES gration of carefully selected com-ponents (microphones, amplifiers, and loudspeakers) into an overall system providing good frequency response in the audio band which is critical for intelligibility.

At a ' minimum, telephone quality is required (200 to 3300 Hz); higher intelligibility is achieved by a band of 200 to 6100 Hz. (2) Coverage depends on loudspeaker I NO 20000207 11-7 location. Adequate coverage requires that speakers should be placed so that they are available in all necessary areas and that there are no "dead spots" within any area .

• 85 TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 12 * !tV/! /// I , I I I # GUIDELINE it CJ -ll'41 c.,* 41' 6.2.1.6 (Cont'd) b. MICROPHONE CHARACTERISTICS

-(1) Frequency response should be 0 YES compatible with that of the rest of the system. (2) If the powered telephone system 0 YES is used tc, provide microphone input to the announcing system, the telephone system should con-* tain transmitters of quality com-patible with that of the announc-ing system. (3) Microphones should have high 0 YES sensitivity to speech signals. . (4) Dynamic range should permit 50 0 YES dB variations in signal input. * (5) Microphone input should be pro-0 YES vided within the control room. c. LOUDSPEAKER LOCATION (1) Speakers should be provided in the 0 YES control room and other areas where control room personnel operations might be (e.g., rest-rooms, eating areas, locker rooms, etc.). (2) Speakers should be placed to yield 0 NO 22A00209 II-5 an intelligible level of signal throughout the area. d. SPEECH CLARITY -Since proper 0 YES speech over an announcing system dif-fers from normal conversation, operators should be familiarized with the proper way to speak on the announcing system. e. LOUDSPEAKER VOLUME -*, (1) Speaker volume should be 0 NO 22A00210 11-5 adjusted to ensure that speaker communications will not prevent detection of auditory alarms .

• 86 TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&.

HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 12 * ~-; ~/ I & I § .:: 111 !lj # I I .~ GUIDELINE $ $ , 6.2.1.6e (Cont'd) (2) Audio gain controls (if provided) 0 NO 22A00210 II-5 should be limited to preclude reducing volume below an audible level. f. PRIORITY -Control room inputs to 0 NO 22A00208 CPT the plant announcing system should have priority over any other input. The control room input should be capable of interrupting an announcement in pro-gress, or of bypassing queued announce-ments. 6.2.1. 7 POINT-TO-POINT INTERCOM SYS-TEMS a. INTELLIGIBILITY -At a minimum, M YES the intercom system should provide transmission of the voice spectrum to telephone standards (200 to*3300 Hz) .

• b. GAIN ADJUSTMENT

-Gain should be 0 YES adjustable at each intercom unit, but adjustability should be limited to pre-elude reducing volume below an audible level. 6.2.1.8 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

a. BACKUP EQUIPMENT

-Provisions I NO 20000203 11-7 should be made to assure complete 20000204 11-7 internal and external communications 20000205 11-7 capabilities during emergencies. 20000206 II-7 ioooo207 11-7 20000212 II-7 b. EQUIPMENT USABILITY -Communi-NIA NIA cations equipment should be usable by personnel wearing protective gear with-out impediment to their tasks. c. VOICE COMMU.NICATIONS WITH MASKS **, (1) Emergency face masks should be NIA NIA equipped with diaphragms that are specially designed to transmit speech .

• 87
• *
• TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 10 of 12 ""'"" 1/l/~1 // / / / ________ _.;.;..;.;;;;;,;;.;;,.

________ +-...;.,~-+--..;._-f----jf------~ 6.2.1.Bc (Cont'd) (2) The diaphragms should be able to separate voice from exhaust valve action. (3) If not equipped with diaphragms, masks should be equipped with electronic speech systems which pick up the voice with an internal microphone and transmit it to a loudspeaker attached outside the mask. 6.2.2~1 USE OF AUDITORY SIGNALS a. DEDICATED USE -Systems used to transmit nonverbal auditory signals

• should be used only for that purpose. b. LOCALIZATION

-Auditory signals should provide localization cues that direct operators to those control room . work stations where operator attention is required.

c. SELECTION

-(1) Auditory signals should be selected to avoid confusion with ambient control room noises. (2) Auditory signals should be selected to avoid interference with other auditory sources, including verbal communication. 6.2.2.2 SIGNAL MEANING a. b. c. The meaning of each auditory signal should be clear and unambiguous. Similar auditory signals must not be contradictory in meaning with one another .. Auditory signals intended to alert the operator to a malfunction or failure must be different from routine signals such as bells, buzzers, and normal operating noises. 88 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 NO N/A N/A 0 YES 22A02906 II-5 Annunciator alarm system

• *
• TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 11 of 12 GUIDELINE 6.2.2.3 AUDITORY CODING TECHNIQUES DISTINCTIVE CODING -Coding methods should be distinct and unam-a. b. c. .d. e. biguous, and should not conflict with other auditory signals. PULSE CODING -Auditory signals may be pulse coded by repetition rate, but the number of codes should be limited (2 or 3). Repetition rates should be sufficiently separated to ensure operator discrimination. FREQUENCY CHANGE CODING -: If modulation of the frequency (Hz) of a signal denotes information, center quencies should be between 500 and 1000 Hz. DISCRETE-FREQUENCY CODING -Discrete-frequency codes may be used for audible signal coding. Frequencies should be broad band (!10 O Hz) and widely spaced within the 200-5000 Hz range. No more than 5 separate quencies should be used. CODING BY INTENSITY -Coding by intensity is not recommended. 6.2.2.4 PROPAGATION OF SIGNALS a. b. DIRECTION OF SOUND -Sound sources (speakers, buzzers, etc.) should direct sound toward the center of the primary operating area. AUDIBILITY -Auditory alert and warning signals should be audible in all parts of tne control r:oom. 6.2.2.5 FREQUENCY

a. RANGE -Auditory signal frequencies should be between 200 and 500 Hz. The optimum frequency range is between 500 and 3000 Hz . 89 0 YES ~/A NIA IN/A N/A M YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES M YES D

• *
• TABLE 3-8 COMMUNICATIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 12 or 12 IIUIDELINE 6.2.2.5 (Cont'd b. BANDWIDTH -Wide-band auditory signals of approximately 200 Hz should be used. ' ,I I j 6.2.2.6 SIGNAL INTENSITY

a. b. c. GENERAL -In general, a system capability to develop a signal-to-noise ratio of 20 dB in at least one octave band between 200. an 5000 Hz should be adequate for all control rooms and environments.

This signal-to-noise ratio capability should apply throughout the primary operating area. However, a 20 dB differential may not be sary for all signals and all ments. A normal value of 10 dB(A) above average ambient noise is generally adequate (See Guideline 6.3.2.1.) COMFORT -Auditory signal intensity should not cause discomfort or "ringing in the ears. MAXIMUM INTENSITY -Auditory signal intensities should not exceed 90 dB(A), except for evacuation signals, which may be up to 115 dB(A). 6.2.2.7 RELIABILITY

a. b. c. FAILURE OF ALARM CIRCUITRY

-Failure of auditory signal circuitry should not adversely affect plant ment. FALSE ALARMS -Auditory alarm systems should be designed so that false alarms are avoided. SYSTEM TEST -Auditory signal tem test capabilities should be vided . 90 0 YES D M YES D 0 YES M NO 22A02905 Il-6 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES

• • *
• 3.9 Annunciator Survey This section documents the results of the annunciator survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of* NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.9.1 Objectives The objectives of the annunciator survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which the annunciator system in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. . Identify and document any features of the annunciator system that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.9.2 Scope

The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the annunciator system design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:

• General system design
• Alarm parameter selection
• First-out annunciators
• Prioritization
• Cleared alarms
• Signal detection
• Auditory coding
• Visual annunciator panels
• Visual alarm recognition and identification
• Arrangement of alarm tiles
• Tile legends
• Tile readability
• Annunciator controls
• Annunciator response procedures
• . 3.9.3 Criteria The criteria applied in thi~ survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.3.1.1; 6.3.1.2a through d(2); 6.3.1.3a through d; 6.3.1.4a and b; 6.3.1.5a 91
• *
• through b(3); 6.3.2.la through f; 6.3.3.la through b(2); 6.3.2.2a and b; 6.3.3.la through c(3); 6.3.3.2a through f(2); 6.3.3.3a through f; 6.3.3.4a through d; 6.3.3.5a through d(6); 6.3.4.la through d(2); 6.3.4.2a through c; 6.3.4.3a and b; 6.5.1.6a through c(2) and e(l) through 3(3); and 6.6.6.2a, b, and _c. 3.9.4 Method 3.9.4.1 Data Collection

a. Data collected during the operator interviews were reviewed to identify any potential problems in the design or operation of the annunciator system. b. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the annunciator task plan.* c. Data were collected primarily through measurement and direct vation of the annunciator system in the CR. As necessary, system documentation (e.g., P&IDs, electrical drawings, annunciator response procedures) were reviewed to augment and corroborate observations and _ interviews.

3.9.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:

a.

• All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the nents or system involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradi~tory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c. Upon completion of. all analyses, the criteria of the annunciator task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3.9.5 Findings

The findings of the annunciator survey are presented in Table 3-9, "Annunciator Survey Findings and HEDs Generatect.*i Overall, 98 criteria were applied to the annunciator system in the Surry control room. Of these, 14 (14%) were not applicable, 52 (53%) were in compliance and 32 (3396) were not in compliance. A total of 41 HEDs were generated which document all the 32 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address set points, multi-input annunciators, general alarms, reflash capabiHty, tion, auditory signals, signal detection, visual alarm contract detectability, labeling, of-service and blank alarms, silence controls and permanence of demarcation lines. 92

• *
• Table 3-9 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings.

Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED . 93 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs-GENERATED Page 1 of 14 * ~&! I I § " , I I GUIDELINE CJ ;, " 6.3.1.1 GENERAL SYSTEM DESIGN Annunciator warning systems are the primary I NO 20A02920 CPT control room interface to immediately alert the operator to out-of-tolerance changes in plant condition. Annunciator warning sys-terns consist of three major subsystems: (a) an auditory alert subsystem, (b) a visual alarm subsystem, and (c) an operator response subsystem (see Exhibit 6.3-1). Together, these three subsystems should be designed to provide a preferred operational sequence for annunciator warnings as indicated in Exhibit 6.3.2 6.3.1.2 ALARM PARAMETER SELEC"l10N

a. SET POINTS -The limits or set points for initiating the annunciator warning system should be established to meet the following goals: (1) Alarms should not occur so fre-I NO 20A02904 I-5

• quently as to be considered a nuisance by the operators.

(2) However, set points should be I NO 20A02907 II-7 established to give operators 20A02908 II-7 adequate time to respond to the* 20A02909 Il-7 warning condition before a serious 20A02910 II-7 problem develops. 20A02911 CPT 22A01704 1-2 22A02919 CPT b. GENERAL ALARMS -(1) Alarms that require the control I NO 20A02912 Ill-9 room operator to direct an auxil-20A02913 11-6 iary operator to a given plant 20A02914 11-6 location for specific information 20A02916 11-7 should be avoided. (2) If general alarms must be used I NO 20A02912 III-9

• they should only be used for con-20A02913 11-6 ditions that allow adequate time 20A02914 11-6 for auxiliary operator action and subsequent control room operator 20A02916 Il-7 action .
• 94 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 14

• Ii~&/ 7 I h § # # , GUIDELINE JI (1 '1 " 6.3.1.2 (Cont'd) c. MULTICHANNEL OR SHARED ALARMS-(1) Annunciators with inputs from D YES more than one plant parameter set point should be avoided. Multi-input alarms that sum-marize single-input annunciators elsewhere in the control room are an exception.

(2) Where multi-input annunciators 0 NO 22A02123 Il-5 must be used, an alarm printout capability should be provided. The specifics of the alarm should be printed on an alarm typer with sufficient speed and buffer stor-age to capture all alarm data. (3) A reflash capability should be 0 NO 20002121 Il-5 provided to allow subsequent

• alarms to activate the auditory alert mechanism and reflash the visual tile even though the first alarm may not have been cleared. d. MULTI-UNIT ALARMS (1) Alarms for any shared plant sys-N/A N/A terns should be duplicated in all control rooms. (2) When an item of shared equip-'N/ A N/A ment is being operated from. one control room a status display or signal should be provided in all. other control rooms which could potentially control this equip-* ment. 6.3.1.3 FIRST OUT ANNUNCIATORS

a. REACTOR SYSTEM -(1) A separate first out panel should 0 YES *, Demarcated; shows be provided for the reactor sys-as red tern .

• 95 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 3 o! 14
• V// $ "~ ,--,,~ I I SUIDELINE 41:' 6.3.1.3a (Cont'd) (2) The first out panel should consist I YES of separate annunciator tiles for. each of the automatic reactor trip functions.

I (3) In the event of a reactor trip, the I YES tile associated with the event should illuminate, and no other. b. TURBINE-GENERATOR SYSTEM -A 0 YES separate first out panel, similar in function to the reactor system panel, is recommended.

c. POSmON -First out panels should be 0 YES located directly above the main control work station for the system. d. APPLICATION

,-First out annuncia-0 YES tors should conform to the general auditory, visual, and opera tor response*

• guidelines of this section . 6.3.1.4 PRIORITIZATION A. LEVELS OF PRIORITY -(1) Prioritization should be accom-I NO 20A02901 III-8 plished using a relatively small 20A02125 11-5 (2-4) number of priority levels. (2) Prioritization should be based on I NO 20A02125 11-5 a continuum of importance, 20A02901 III-8 severity, or need for operator action in one or more dimensions, e.g., likelihood of reactor trip, release of radiation.

Exhibit 6.3-3 provides an example of prioritization based on three levels of prioritization .

• 96

---

, TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 14 * ~&! I. I I G § # # , ii GUIDELINE

1. J 6.3.1.4 (Cont'd) b. PRIORITY CODING -(1) Some method for coding the vis-0 YES ual signals for the various priority I levels should be employed.

Acceptable methods for priority coding include color, position, shape, oi: symbolic coding. (2) Auditory signal coding for priority NIA NIA level is also appropriate. See Guideline 6.2.2.3 for recom-mended coding techniques. 6.3.1.5 CLEARED ALARMS a. AUDITORY SIGNAL -Cleared alarms I NO 20A02903 II-5 should have a dedicated, distinctive 23A09217 II-5 audibie signal which should be of finite duration.

b. VISUAL SIGNAL -The individual tile 0 YES

• should have one of the following:

(1) A special flash rate (twice or one-half the .normal flash rate is preferred, to allow discrimina-tion), or (2) Reduced brightness, or (3) A special color, consistent with the overall control room color coding scheme, produced by a differently colored bulb behind the tile. 6.3.2.1 SIGNAL DETECTION

a. INTENSITY

-The signal should be such that operators can reliably discern the sjgnal above the ambient control M YES room noise. A nominal value of 10 dB(A) above average ambient noise is generally adequate.

• ,
• 97 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 14 * !iY./7 7 I I I , GUIDELINE

., ¥~ /! 6.3.2.1 (Cont'd) b. CONTROL -Signal intensity, if NIA N/A adjustable, should be controlled by D administrative procedure. C, LIMITS -The signal should capture the I NO 20A02902 11-5 operator's attention but should not cause irritation or a startled reaction.

d. DETECTION

-Each auditory signal 0 YES should be adjusted to result in approxi-I mately equal detection levels at normal operator work stations in the primary operating area. e. RESET -The annunciator auditory 0 YES alert mechanism should automatically reset when it has been silenced.

f. IDENTIFICATION

-The operator 0 YES should be able to identify the work I station or the system where the audi-tory alert signal originated. Separate

• auditory signals at each work station within the primary operating area are recommended.

6.3.2.2 AUDITORY CODING 8; LOCALIZATION (1) Auditory coding techniques should I YES be used when the operator work station associated with the alarm is not in the primary operating area. (2) Coded signals from a single audio ~IA source should not be used to NIA identify individual work stations within the primary operating area; b. PRIORITIZATION -Coding may be I NO 20A02901 ~11-8 used to indicate alarm priority. (See Guideline 6.3.1.4.)

• 98 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 14
• y;~J I I . s * , I 11 $ ~" I GUIDELINE Cl:' 6.3.3.1 VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANE~ a. LOCATION -Visual alarm panels 0 should be located above the related NO 20002103 CPT controls and displays which ar.e required for corrective or diagnostic liction in response to the alarm. (See Exhibit 6.3-4.) b. LABELING-(1) Each panel should be identified by 0 YES a label ab_ove the panel. (2) Panel identification label height M YES should be consistent with a sub-tended visual angle of a least 15 minutes when* viewed from a cen-tral position within the primary operating area. 6.3.3.2 VISUAL ALARM RECOG AND !DENT
• a. FLASHING -The specific tile(s) on an 0 YES annunciator panel should use flashing illumination to indicate an alarm cori-dition. b. FLASH RATE -Flash rates should be M YES from three to five flashes per second with approximately equal on and off times. c. FLASHER FAIL URE -In case of 0 YES flasher failure of an alarmed tile, the tile light should illuminate and burn steadily.

d. CONTRAST DETECTABILITY

-There 0 NO 20002122 II-5 should be high enough contrast between alarming and steady-on tiles, and between illuminated and nonilluminated tiles~ so that operators in a normally illuminated control room have no pro-blem discriminating alarming, steady-on, and steady-off visual tiles. *,

• 99 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 'I of 14 * /J~*; I 7 I I I ; I $/ I IIUIDHINE 6.3.3.2 (Cont'd) e. "DARK" ANNUNCIATOR PANEIS -A I NO 20A02102 ll-5 "dark" annunciator panel concept should be used This means that under normal operating conditions no annunciators would be illuminated; all of the visual tiles of the annunciator panels would be "dark." r. EXTENDED DURATION ILLUMINA-I NO 20A02104 CPT TION -If an annunciator tile must be "ON" for an extended period,during normal operations (e.g., during equip-ment repair or replacement), it should be: (1) Distinctively coded for positive 0 NO 20002120 ll-5 recognition during this period, and (2) Controlled by administrative D YES procedures.
• 6.3.3.3 ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL I ALARM TILES a. MATRIX ORGANIZATION

-Visual 0 YES alarms should be organized as a matrix of visual alarm tiles within each annun-ciator panel b. FUNCTIONAL GROUPING -Visual D YES alarm tiles should be grouped by func-tion or system within each annunciator panel For example area radiation alarms should be grouped on one panel, not spread throughout the control room. c. LABELING OR AXF.S -(1) The vertical and horizontal axes 0 NO 22A02107 m-s of annunciator panels should be

• labeled with alphanumerics for ready coordinate designation of a particular visual tile .
• 100 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 14
• y;~; I I § ' I # , GUIDELINE " JI 6.3.3.3c (Cont'd) (2) Coordinate designation is 0 YES preferred on the left and top sides of the annunciator panel, (3) Letter height for coordinate 0 NO 22A02108 III-8 designation should be consistent with a subtended visual angle of at least 15 minutes as viewed from a central position within the primary operating area. d. PA 'ITERN RECOGNITION

-(1) The number of alarm tiles and the 0 NO 22A02110 Il-5 matrix density should be kept low (a maximum of 50 tiles per matrix is suggested). (2) Tiles within an annunciator panel D YES matrix should be grouped by sub-system, function, or other logical organization .

• e. OUT-OF-SERVICE ALARMS -Cues I NO 20A02124 CPT for prompt recognition of an out-of-service annunciator should be designed into the system. f. BLANK TILES -Blank or unused 0 NO 22A02109 CPT annunciator tiles should not be illumi-nated (except during annunciator testing) 6.3.3.4 VISUAL TILE LEGENDS a. UNAMBIGUOUS

-Annunciator visual I tile legends should be specific and NO 20A02106 Il-5 unambiguous. Wording should be in concise, short messages.

b. SINGULARITY

-Alarms which refer I YES the operator to another, more detailed annunciator panel located outside the primary operating area should be mini-mized .

• 101 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 14

• yj &/ I I # . ;:: g,. I! I I # GUIDELINE " (! 'f 6.3.3.4 (Cont'd) c. SPECIFICITY

-Tile legends should 0 NO 22A02111 Il-5 address specific conditions; for exam-ple, do not use one alarm for HIGH-LOW, TEMPERATURE-PRESSURE. 6.3.3.5 VISUAL ffLE READABILITY

a. DISTANCE -The operator should be able to read all the annunciator tiles from the position at the work station where the annunciator acknowledge control is located. (1) Letter height should subtend a 0 NO 22A02112 II-5 minimum visual angle of 15 min-utes, or .004 x viewing distance.

The preferred visual angle is 20 minutes, or .006 x viewing dis-tance. (2) Letter height should be identical M YES

• for all tiles, based on the maxi:.. mum viewing distance.

Separate calculations should be made for stand-up and sit-down work sta-tions. b. TYPE STYLE -The size and style of . lettering should. meet the following: (1) Type styles should be simple. 0 YES (2) Type styles should be consistent 0 YES on all visual tiles. (3) Only upper -case type should be 0 YES used on visual tiles. c. LEGEND CONTRAST -Legends should provide high contrast with the tile background. (1) Legends should be engraved. 0 NO 22A02126 CPT (2) Legends should be dark lettering 0 YES on a light background ..

• 102 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 10 of 14
• I I # .:: # # ~, GUIDELINE " ... CJ E 6.3.3.5 (Cont'd) d. LETTER DIMENSIONS AND SP AC-ING -(1) Stroke-width-to-character-height M YES ratio should be between 1 :6 and 1:8. (2) Letter width-to-height ratio M YES should be between 1:1 and 3:5. (3) Numeral width-to-height ratio 0 NO 22A02114 11-5 should be 3:5. (4) Minimum space between charac-M YES ters should be one stroke width. (5) Minimum space between words* M YES should be the width of one char-acter. (6) Minimum space between lines 0 NO 22A02115 II-5 should be one...:half the character
• height. 6.3.4.1 CONTROIS (See Exhibit 6~3-5.) a. SILENCE -(1) Each set of operator response 0 NO 22A02116 Il-5 controls should include a silence I 20B03005 Il-5 control. (2) It should be possible to silence an I NO 20B03005 Il-5 auditory alert signal from any set of annunciator response controls in the primary operating area. b. "ACKNOWLEDGE (1) A control should be provided to 0 YES terminate the flashing of a visual . tile and have it continue at steady illumination until the alarm is cleared. *, ,,
• 103 TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 11 of 14 * ~&/ !17 I # l! ;:; # I I I $~ GUIDELINE

.. 6.3.4.1 (Cont'd) (2) Acknowledgement should be pos-I YES sible only at the work station where the alarm originated. C, RESET (1) If an automatic cleared alarm 0 YES feature is not provided, a control should be provided to reset the system after an alarm has cleared. (2) The reset control should silence I YES any audible signal indicating clearance and should extinguish tile illumination. (3) The reset control should be effec-I YES tive only at the work station for the annunciator panel where the alarm initiated .

• d. TEST (1) A control to test the auditory I YES signal and flashing illumination of all tiles in a panel should be pro-vided. (2) Periodic testing of annunciators*

I YES should be required and controlled by administrative procedure. 6.3.4.2 CONTROL SET DESIGN a. POSITIONING OF REPETITIVE 0 YES GROU~ -'-Repetitive groups of annunciator controls should have the same arrangement and relative location at different work stations. This is to facilitate i'blind" reaching.

b. CONTROL CODING -Annunciator 0 YES response controls should be coded for easy recognition using techniques such as:

• 104
• *
• TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 12 of 14 ""'"" 1/l/~1 Ill I / _.,;_ _____ _,:::::::::::::..._

_____ ~~-+-....;_+-_.:,_...;....-f-~+-------; 6.3.4.2b. (Cont'd) c. (1) Color coding; (2) color shading the group 1 of annun-ciator controls; 1 (3) demarcating the group of ciator controls; or (4) shape coding, particularly the silence control. (See Exhibit 6.3-5, Ex!imple 2.) -NONDEFEATABLE CONTROLS -Annunciator control designs should not. allow the operator to defeat the trol. For example, some pushbuttons used for annunciator silencing and acknowledgement can be held down by inserting a coin in the ring around the pushbutton. This undesirable design feature should be eliminated . 6.3.4.3 ANNUCIATOR R~PONSE PROCEDURES

a. b. AN AILABILITY

-Annunciator response procedures should be available in the control room. INDEXING -Annunciator response procedures should be indexed by panel identification and annunciator tile coordinates. 6;5.1.6 COLOR -CODING a. REDUNDANCY -In all applications of color. coding, color should provide redundant information. That is, the pertinent information should be able from*some other cue in addition to color .. 105 0 YES N/A N/A 0 YES 0 NO 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES N/A N/A 22A02117 CPT Color coding is covered in Section 3.13, Conventions. See 6.5.1.6 in Tabl b 3-13. TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 13 of 14

• j'~/1 I I I ,;s it, g; 8> IS! GUIDELINE II ~I " .. C,j .. 6.5.1.6 (Cont'd) b. NUMBER OF COLORS -(1) The number of colors used for NIA NIA coding should be kept to the mini-mum needed for providing suffi-cient information.

(2) The number of colors used for NIA NIA coding should not exceed 11. c. MEANING OF COLORS -(1) The meaning attached to a partic-NIA NIA *, ular color should be narrowly defined. (2) Red, green, and amber (yellow) NIA NIA should be reserved for the fol-lowing uses: Red: unsafe, danger, immediate operator action required, or an

• indication that a critical para-meter is out of tolerance.

Green: safe, no operator action required, or an indication that a parameter is within tolerance. Amber (yellow): hazard {poten-tially unsafe), caution, attention required, or an indication that a marginal value or parameter exists. e. PRINCIPLES OF COLOR SELECTION (1) The primary principle which NIA NIA should be applied in selecting colors for coding purposes which do not have the immediate safety implications of red, green, and amber is to ensure that each color

• is recognized as different from any other. Exhibit 6.5-7 lists 22 colors of maximum contrast.

Each successive color has been selected so that it will contrast maximally with the color just preceding it and satisfactorily with earlier colors in the list. The first 9 colors have been

• 106
• * * ----------------------------------------

TABLE 3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 14 of 14 GUIDELINE 6.5.l.6d(l) (Cont'd) selected so as to yield tory contrast for red-green cient as well as color-normal observers. The remaining 13 colors are useful only for normal observers. (2) Colors selected for coding should contrast well with the background on which they appear. (3) Ambient lighting in the area in which color coding is used will influence the apparent color of the coded element (especially for surface colors). Each color selected for coding should be evaluated under all illumination conditions under which it is used. 6.6.6.2 DEMARCATION

a. USE -Lines of demarcation can be used to: (1) Enclose functionally related dis-plays. (2) Enclose functionally related con-trols (3) Group related controls and dis-plays. b. CONTRAST -Lines of demarcation should be visually distinctive from the panel background.

c. PERMANENCE

-Lines of demarca-.tion should be permanently attached . 107 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 NO 22A02127 III-8 I -i

• **
• 3.10 Controls Survey This section documents the results of the controls survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.10.1 Objectives

/ The objectives of the controls survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which all controls in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify and document any features of the controls that do not conform to the criter.ia in NUREG-0700.

3.10.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the control design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The control topics evaluated include:

• General principles of control design
• Prevention of accidental activation
• Direction of movement
• Coding of controls
• Pushbutton design
• Round pushbuttons
• Legend pushbuttons
• Rotary selector controls
• J-handle controls
• Continuous adjustment rotary controls
• Thumbwheels
• Slide switches
• Toggle switches
• Separation of controls.

Several NUREG-0700 guidelines appropriate to controls were addressed as part of task analysis and task verification and validation activities. These have, therefore, been incorporated lnto the verification and validation evaluation reports

• 108 3.10.3 Criteria
• The criteria appli~d in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, **
• are: paragraphs 6.4.1.la(l) through c(2) and e(l) through e(3); 6.4.1.2a through g; 6.4.2.1; 6.4.2.2c(l}

through c(4), e and f(l) through f(3); 6.4.3.lb and c; 6.4.3.2a(l) through d; 6.4.3.3.b(l), (2), (4), (5) and d(l) through e(5); 6.4.4.la; 6.4.4.2a(l) through b; 6.4.43a

• througn g(3); 6.4.4.4a through e(5); 6.4.4.5a through f; 6.4.5.la through d(2)(e); 6.4.5.2a through b(2); 6.4.5.3a through c(6); 6.4.5a(l) through e(4); 6.5.L6a through c(2) and d(3) through e(3); and 6.8.3.la through c. The detailed definitions for ea.ch criterion are presented in Table 3-10.
• 3.10.4 Method 3.10.4.1 Data Collection

a. Data collected during operator interviews were reviewed to identify potential problems in the design, location, or operation of CR controls.

b. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the Controls Task Plan. The majority of the data were collected through interviews with CR operators and direct observation of controls.

in the CR. As necessary, measurements were made of the physical characteristics (e.g., size, separation, displacement of the controls)

• 3.10.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the fallowing procedure:

a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the control or controls involved (e.g., rotary controls, pushbuttons, J-handle trols, etc.), a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b~ The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant p~ant personnel.

c. -Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the controls task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3.10.5 Findings The findings of the controls survey are presented in Table 3-10, "Controls Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 149 criteria were applied to the controls in the Surry control room. Of these, 34 (23%) were not applicable, 80 (54%) were in compliance, _ and 35 (24%) were not in compliance. A total of 57 HEDs were generated which document 109 { all of the 35 criteria that were not met. In general, those REDs address accidental

• activation of controls, inconsistent direction of movement, moveable covers, coding of controls, and pushbutton resistance.
• Table 3-10 also includes the category assigned to each RED during assessment meetings.

Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an RED. 110 TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 19 * /J~! . Ill # .:: 4! # I! I itJI GUIDELINE 41' q, 6.4.1.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES

a. ADEQUACY-(1) It should provide a sufficient 0 NO 23003046 Il-6 range of control. 23003047 1-4 23003052 Il-7 23A03068 Il-5 23A03214 1-5 23¥03202 IIl-9 (2) It should be easily adjusted with I NO 20A03013 1-1 the required level of precision.

23A03210 11-6 23A03211 Il-7 23A03212 Il-7 b. ECONOMY -(1) There should be a good reason to I NO 20A03009 Il-7 require a control for the function 20A03044 III-9 concerned. 20A03045 III-9 20A03053 11-7 22A01213 Ill-9

• 23A06801 II-6 (2) Duplication of controls should not I NO 20A03010 III-9 occur, except for a specific reason. (3) The precision and range of a con-0 YES trol should not greatly exceed the need. ( 4) Selected controls should be 0 YES economic of space. c: HUMAN SUITABILITY

-(1) Each control should be recogniz-0 NO 23A03213 Il-6 . able in terms of its function. (2) Each control should be of the type I NO 20A03011 11-6 normally ,anticipated for the 20A03032 III-9

• operation concerned.

This means 20A03033 11-5 conforming to operator expectati-ans, matching to other controls for the same function, and ' generally conforming to conven-., tional practice .

• 111 TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 o! 19 * !ti// 1/// I I I I $~ IUIDELINE

'ii' 6.4.1.le. (Cont'd) e. DURABIIJTY -(1) Broken, chipped, or crumbled 0 NO 22A06301 I-5 control surfaces should not ordi-narily occur. (2) Control knobs or handles should I NO 20A03012 CPT not rotate, slip, or move loosely on their shafts. (3) No internal wear or breakage I NO 20A03012 CPT should occur which alters the "feel" or other sensory feedback of a controL Controls should not develop internal looseness, binding, or backlash. 6.4.1.2 PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATION

a. PROPER LOCATION -Controls 0 NO 22A03035 CPT

• should be located and oriented so that the opera tor is not likely to strike or move them accidentally in any sequence of control movements.

b. FIXED PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES

-(1) Controls may be recessed, 0 YES shielded, or otherwise surrounded by physical barriers. (See Exhibit 6.4-1) (2) The control should be entirely 0 YES contained within the envelope described by the recess or barrier. c. MOVABLE COVERS OR GUARDS -(1) Controls may be covered or I NO 20B03006 III-7 guarded with movable (e.g., hinged) barriers. (See Exhibit 6.4-2) (2) Safety or lock wires should not be 0 IYES used .

• 112 TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 3 or 19 * ~&! I I . II , I I GUIDELINE . ~* t1 Cl' 6.4.1.2 (Cont'd) (3) When the guard is in the open I NO 20B03006 III-7 position, it should-not interfere with the operation of the guarded control or other adjacent con-trols. d. INTERLOCKING CONTROLS -Con-trols may be provided with interlocks so that: (1) Extra movement is required (e.g., I NO 20A03008 III-9 a side movement out of a detent 20A03043 III-9 position or a pull-to-engage clutch). *. (2) Prior operation of a related or I NO 20A03008 IIl-9 locking control is required.

20A03043 III-9 e. RESISTANCE TO MOVEMENT-Con-I ~o 20A03060 CPT trols should be provided with resistance '* .* (e.g., friction or spring-loading), so that

• distinct or sustained effort is required for activation.

f. SEQUENTIAL ACTIVATION

-When a I ~o 20B03401 III-9 strict sequential activation is neces-sary, controls should be provided with . locks to prevent the controls from passing through a position. Further movement should require a new control -action. g. CHOICE OF ACTION -Rotary action I ~o 20A03_007 11-5 controls should be used in situations 20A03039 1-4 where linear or pushbutton c~mtrols 20A03051 II-6 would be subject to inadvertent activa-20A03069 II-6

• tion, and fixed protective structures 20A03070 CPT are impractical or inappropriate.

20A03071 III-9 20A03072 II-7 20A03073 II-6 6.4.2.1 DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT To minimize operator error, control movements should conform to the following population stereotypes (for U.S. population -, only): a. ON, START, RUN, OR OPEN -Up, 0 NO 20A03049 Il-7

• right, forward, clockwise, or pull. 22A03601 Il-6 23A03102 11-6 113 TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 19
• Ill/! Ill I I !!5 ,;:; , I $ , , GUIDELINE ' 6.4.2.1 {Cont'd) b .. OFF, STOP, CLOSE -Down, left, 0 YES backward, counterclockwise, or push. I c. RIGHT {AS A FUNCTION).

"4' Clockwise . NIA NIA or right.-d. LEFT (AS A FUNCTION) -Counter-NIA NIA clockwise or left. e. RAISE -Up. 0 YES f. LOWER -Do.wn. 0 YES g. INCREASE -Forward, up, right, or 0 YES cl_ockwise.

h. DECREASE -Backward, down, left, or 0 YES counterclockwise.

6.4.2.2 CODING OF CONTROLS C, SIZE CODING * (1) No more than three different I NO 20A03011 II-6 sizes of controls should be used 20A03032 III-9 for discrimination by absolute 20A03033 II-5 size. (2) Controls used for performing the 0 YES same function on different items of equipment should be the same size. (3) When knob d1ameter is used as a I NO 20A03011 II-6 coding parameter, differences 20A03032 III-9 between diameters should be at 20A03033 II-5 least o.~ inch. (4) When knob thickness is a coding NIA NIA parameter, differences between thicknesses should be at least 0.4 . inch. d. SHAPE CODING -When possible, controls should be differentiated by shape. In particular, controls which may be manipulated in a "blir:id" fashion should be shape coded. For example, where an operator must simultaneously observe a display and move a control

• 114
• *
• TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 19 ---------_;;G.;,;Ul;.:DE;,;;ll;.:.;NE;__

__ ..;._ _____ .,._...;#:...~~~-,;..l_ 1+/.--°".;..IJ__;./_ 8-+~-~;;..#_ 5+/-* ___ ,_,_~ __ --1/ 6.4.2.2 (Cont'd) e. f. which is outside his field of view, the controls should be shape-coded and separated by distance. Control shapes should be: (1) Visually identifiable. (2) ractually identifiable. ROTATING KNOB SHAPE OPTIONS -Rotating knob controls for different types of control actions should be tinguishable by sight and touch and not easily confused with each *other. Exhibits 6.4-4 through 6.4-6 give examples of 15 suitable knob designs developed for three major classes of knobs, each class intended for a ferent purpose: multiple rotation, tional rotation, and detent positioning. COLOR CODING (1) Color coding should follow the recommendations of Guideline 6.5.1.6. (3) The color of the control should contrast with the panel ground. (See Guideline 6.1.5.6.e) 6.4.3.1 PUSHBUTTON DP.SIGN PRINCIPLES

b. INDICATION OF ACTIVATION

-To ensure that the operator knows that a pushbutton has been pressed far enough for activation, a positive indication should be provided in the form of a snap feel, an audible click, or an integral light. c. PUSHBUTTON SURF ACE -For best operation, the surface of a pushbutton should offer slip resistance, or be cave . 115 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES I NO 0 YES 20A03402 II-6 20A03405 11-5 20A03406 II-5 20A03407 II-5 20A03408 1-2

• *
• TABLE 3-10 CONTRO~ SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 19 !iii~!/ ~~,; l *! § I CJf § _________ .....:,G::,UID::E::,LIN:,:E~---------1-_.:""'-+-:..,_+--..,..;._..;;""_+-.....;;~f----""----; 6.4.3.2 ROUND PUSHBUTTONS (See Exhibit 6.4-7) a. Diameter (D), for fingertip operation (inches) b. c. d. (1) Unguarded and nonrecessed buttons Minimum 0.385 (2) Guarded or recessed pushbuttons Minimum 0. 75 Diameter (D), for thumb or heel of hand operation (inches) Minimum 0. 75 Displacement (A), for thumb or finger operation (inches) Minimum 0.125 Resistance (R), for fingertip operation (ounces) Minimum 10 Maximum 40 6.4.3.3 LEGEND PUSHBUTI'ONS

a. DISCRIMIN ABILITY -Legend pushbuttons should be readily distinguishable from legend lights. This may be achieved by distinctive shape, labeling, location, or other techniques. (See also Guideline 6.5.3.3) b. LEGEND (1) The legend should be readable under ambient light conditions, with or without internal tion. (2) The illuminated condition should . be clearly recognizable under the highest predicted ambient light condition and should be at least 10% brighter than the surrounding panel. (3) Legend lettering and contrast should conform to tions for legend lights (Guideline 6.5.3.3) . 116 M YES M .!YES M YES M !YES M INO N/A NIA 0 NO 0 NO 0 YES 22A03409 III-9 22A03404 III-9 22A03410 1-5 Covered in Section 3.11, Displays.

See 6.5.3.3c in Table 3-11. TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 19

• Ill/! ~-7 7 $ ;Ji; # I ., GUIDELINE '1 Jf~ 6.4.3.3b. (Cont'd) (4) The legend message should be 0 YES specific, unambiguous, and con-* cise. (5) The legend message should con-0 NO 22A03403 Ill-9 tain no more than three lines of lettering.

d. BARRIERS (1) Barriers should be used when 0 NO 22A03411 CPT legend pushbuttons are contigu-ous. (2) Barriers should have rounded 0 YES edges. e. LEGEND PUSHBUTTON DIMENSIONS

-For maximum effec-tiveness of legend pushbutton controls, the following dimensions should be used * (see Exhibit 6.4.8): (1) Size (S) (inches) M YES Minimum 0. 75 Maximum 1.5 (2) Displacement (A) (inches) M YES Minimum O (touch plate). Minimum 0.125 (all others) Maximum 0.250 (3) Barrier width (Bw) (inches) '.VI YES Minimum 0.125 (4) Barrier depth (Ba) (inches) M YES Minimum 0.183 Maximum 0.250 (5) Resistance (ounces) M YES Minimum 10 (except touch plate) . Maximum 40

• 117 TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 19
• 0~1 I , :t!! I I ,/ I IUIDELINE , 6.4.4.1 ROTARY CONTROL DESIGN PRIN-CIPLF.S a. DIRECTION OF ACTIVATION -Rotary 0 YES control settings should increase in value with a clockwise rotation.

6.4.4.2 .J-HANDLES

a. HIGH-TORQUE DESIGNS -J-handles should conform to dimensions as follows (see Exhioit 6.4-9): (1) Length (L) (inches) M YES Minimum 3. 75 Optimum 4.0 (2) Clearance (C) (inches) M YES Minimum LO Optimum 2.0 b. LOW-TORQUE DESIGNS -For certain I NO 20A03201 Ill-9 purposes, smaller scale J-handles may be used. In such cases the handle pro--* portion usually has a flattened or flared tip for finger placement, and the clear-ance between handle and panel surface can be less. 6.4.4.3 KEY-OPERATED CONTROLS a. USE -Key-operated controls should be 0 NO 22A03207 II-7 used when system requirements dictate 0 22A03208 II-6 that the function being controlled M 23A03048 II-7 should be secured against activation by unauthorized personnel If key-operated controls cannot be justified in terms of security, they are probably not necessary and should not be used. Key-operated switches should not be used solely as a means of shape coding. b. TEETH: SINGLE ROW -Keys with a 0 YES single row of teeth should be inserted into the lock with the teeth pointing up or forward .

• 118 TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 19 * /JV/! $ I $ CUIDELIIIIE ~. I $/ I I _, 6.4.4.3 (Cont'd) c. TEETH: DOUBLE ROW -If keys have N/A N/A teeth on both edges, they should fit the lock with either side up or forward. \ d. ON-OFF ORIENTATION -Locks 0 NO 22A03040 CPT should be oriented so that the switch is OFF (or SAFE) when the key is in the . vertical position.

e. KEY REMOVAL -Operators should 0 YES not normally be able to remove the key from the lock unless the switch is turned to the OFF or SAFE position.

f'. LABELING -Control positions should M YES be labeled. g. KEY-OPERATED CONTROL DIMENSIONS -The following dimen-sions should be used for key-operated controls (see Exhibit 6.4-10) . * (1) Displacement (A) (degrees) M YES Minimum soo Maximum 900 (2) Height (H) (inches) M YES Minimum 0.5 Maximum 3.0 (3) Resistance (inch/pounds) N/A N/A Minimum 1.0 Maximum 6.0 6.4.4.4 CONTINUOUS ADJUSTMENT 0 NO 22A03050 II-7 ROTARY CONTROLS -To ensure precise control along a continuous variable, con-* tinuous adjustment rotary controls are appro-priate. a. KNOBS -Knobs for continuous adjust-0 YES *

• I ment controls should be round in shape, with knurled or serrated edges. ,*
• 119
• *
• TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 10 or 19 GUIDELINE 6.4.4.4 {Cont'd) . b. POSITION INDICATION

-When an indication of position is desirable, the pointer configurations shown jn Exhibit 6.4-11 may be used. Where more accuracy is required, a line should be engraved {and filled with contrasting pigment) both on top and down the side of the pointer, as shown on the knob at the bottom of the exhibit. c. DIMENSIONS

d. (1) Fingertip grasp knobs should form to the following dimensions: (a) Height (inches) Minimum 0.5 :viaximum 1.0 (b) Diameter (inches) Minimum 0.375 Maximum 4.0 (2) Thumb and forefinger encircled knobs should conform to the following dimensions:

Diameter (inches) :vlinimum

1.0 Maximum

3.0 TORQUE -Knob torque should be within the range of 4.5 to 6.0 inch/ounces.

e. CONTINUOUS ADJUSTMENT ROTARY CONTROLS WITH KNOB SKIRTS -If knob skirts are used, such controls should conform to approximately the

• following dimensions.

See Exhibit 6.4-12. (1) . Skirt diameter (Ds): 2.0 inches. (2) Skirt height (Hs): 0.25 inch. 120 0 YES M YES M YES M YES M YES M YES M YES *, I

• **
• TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 11 of 19 GUIDELINE 6.4.4.4e. (Cont'd) (3) Finger stop diameter (Dp): 1.25 inches. (4) Finger stop height (Hp) plus rotary knob height (HK): total 0. 75 inch. (5) Knob diameter (DK): 0.'/5 inch. 6.4.4.5 ROTARY SELECTOR CONTROLS a. SELECTION

-Rotary selector con-trols should be used when three or more -detented positions are required, and may be used for two-detented position operation.

b. POSITIONING (1) To ensure proper positioning of a discrete rotary control, detents should be provided at each control position . (2) It should not be possible to posi-tion a control between detented positions.

(3) A maximum of 24 positions should be used on a rotary selector con-trol. (4) To minimize the possibility of placing a rotary selector control in an unused position, stops should be provided at the limits of the control range. c. READABILITY -To maximize read-ability, rotary controls should have a moving pointer and fixed position settings. . 121 M YES M YES M YES 0 YES I !YES I !YES I !YES 0 YES 0 !YES I TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 12 of 19 * ~b /// # ;:f {I g 4i:) I i:: ii ii GUIDELINE 't' 6.4.4.5 (Cont'd) d. POSITION INDICATION (1) Position indication should be pro-0 INO 20A03204 III-8 vided. Desirable alternatives are: (a) lllumina ted indicator lights, 0 YES (b) A line engraved both on the 0 !YES top of the knob and down the side, or (c) A pointer shape. 0 !YES (2) It should not be possible to con-0 INO 22A03203 III-9 fuse the position of the knob in reference to position markers on the panel. To minimize the prob-lem of parallax, pointers on knobs should be mounted close to the . settings to which they point. e. DIMENSIONS -Recommended dimen-* sions for rotary selector switches are as follows (see Exhibit 6.4-13): (1) Length (L) (inches) M ~ES Minimum 1.0 (2) Width (W) (inches) M IYES Maximum 1.0 (3) Diameter (D) (inches) M !YES Minimum 1.0 (4) Depth (H) (inches) :v'I YES Minimum 0.625 (5) Resistance (inch/pounds) M !YES Minimum 1.0 Maximum 6.0

• 122
• * ' TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 13 of 19 GUIDELINE 6.4.4.5 (Cont'd) f. MOMENTARY CONTACT ROTARY SELECTOR CONTROLS -Knobs for spring-loaded momentary contact rotary selector controls should be large enough to be easily held against the spring torque, without fatigue, for as long as necessary to accomplish the control action. 6.4.5.1 THUMBWHEELS

a. b. c . VISIBILITY

-To minimize error, thumbwheel readouts should be visible from the thumbwheel operating tion. CODING -If the thumbwheel is used as an input device, the OFF, zero, or normal position should be coded to facilitate visual recognition of status. CONTINUOUS ADJUSTMENT WHEELS -The dimensions of wheel controls which permit continuous adjustment (riot stepped or detented) should be as follows: (1) At least 1 inch of the wheel . should be exposed to permit easy manipulation. (2) Resistance should be between 3 and 6 ounces. (3) If the thumbwheel has an OFF position, a detent should be vided for feedback at that point. 123 1'/7 0 NO 20A03205 CPT N/A N/A N/A N/A M YES M YES 0 YES I

• *
• TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 14 of 19 ~0/ I 11~!/ I /, s 11/#.I . .f , --~ ....... _____ _:G:::_Ul:!'.:DE::;:Ll::,:NE;_

________ f-_;,..~-;:_f--"'~.:.""'-f---.;,__t-"""."'"------, 6.4.5.1 (Cont'd) d. DISCRETE SETTING {STEPPED) THUMBWHEELS (1) Thumbwheel controls which have discrete settings should be, detented between positions. The control should*snap into each position, and resist intermediate or uncertain settings. (2) Discrete thumbwheel controls should conform to the following specifications. (See Exhibit 6.4-14) (a) Diameter (D) (inches) Minimum 1.5 Maximum 2.5 (b) Trough distance (L) (inches) Minimum 0.45 Maximum 0. 75 (c) Width, (W) (inches) Minimum 0.1 (d) Depth (H) (inches) Minimum 0.125 Maximum 0.5 (e) Resistance (ounces) Minimum 6 Maximum 20 6.4.5.2 SLIDE SWITCHES a. SURF ACE -The surface of slide switches should be serrated or knurled. b. DIMENSIONS -Slide switches should conform to approximately the following dimensions. See Exhibit 6.4-15. (1) Thickness (T): 0.25 inch . 124 I YES M ~ES M !YES M !YES M !YES M IYES NIA ~IA NIA ~IA

• *
• TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 15_of 19 GUIDELINE 6.4.5.2b (Cont'd) (2) Length (L): 1.0 inch. 6.4.5.3 TOGGLE SWITCHES a. b. POSITIONING

-To minimize the sibility of inadvertent activation or setting between control positions, gle switches should have an elastic resistance that increases as the control is moved and drops as the switch snaps into position. FEEDBACK -Toggle switches should emit an audible click, or provide some other source of feedback on activation.

c. DIMENSIONS

-To ensure the most effective* use, toggle switches should conform to the following dimensions. See Exhibit 6.4-16. (1) Arm length (L), for use by one finger (inches) Minimum 0.5 Maximum 2.0 (2) Tip diameter (D) (inches) Minimum 0.125 Maximum 1.0 (3) Resistance (small switch) (ounces) Minimum. 10 Maximum 16. (4) Resistance (large switch) (ounces) Minimum 10 Maximum 40 * (5) Displacement (A), two position (degrees) Minimum 30

• Maximum 120 125 NIAN/A I YES I YES M YES M YES M YES M YES M YES 7

.P TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 16 of 19

• y:// ~*/ $ I G I II ~II ,:-# GUIDELINE " /1 6.4.5.3c * (Cont'd) (6) Displacement (A), three position * (degrees between settings)

M YES Minimum 18 i Maximum 60 ./,' J Optimum 25 6.4.5.4 ROCKER SWITCHES a. ORIENTATION -Rocker switches N/A N/A should ordinarily be oriented vertically. (1) Activation of the upper part NIA NIA should control the ON or INCREASE function'. (~) Horizontal orientation should be NIA NIA used only when the location of the controlled. function or equipment requires it. b . INDICATION OF ACTIVATION

• (1) Activation should be indicated by N/A NIA a snap feel, an audible click, or an integral light. (2) In the ON position, the top of the NIA NIA switch should be flush with the panel surface. c. RESISTANCE (1) Control resistance should grad-NIA NIA ually increase, then drop to zero when the control snaps into posi-tion. (2) This resistance should preclude N/A NIA the switch being placed between positions.

d. INADVERTENT ACTIVATION

-If it NIA NIA controls a critical function, the switch should be protected by channel guards or other means to prevent inadvertent activation . *,

• 126 TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 17 of 19 * ~& . //7 I # I ii § # If I . , GUIDELINE " *'1 6.4.5.4 (Cont'd) e. ROCKER SWITCH DIMENSIONS

-(see

• Exhibit 6.4-17): (1) Width (W) (inches) N/A N/A Minimum 0. 75 Maximum 1.5 (2) Resistance (ounces) N/A N/A Minimum 10 Maximum 40 (3) Displacement, two-position N/A N/A switches (A) (degrees)

Minimum 30 Maximum 120 (4) Displacement, three-position N/A N/A switches (A) (degrees) Minimum 18 Maximum 60 Optimum 25

• 6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING a .. REDUNDANCY

-In all applications of N/A N/A color coding, color should provide redundant information. That is, the pertinent information should be avail-able from some other cue in addition to color. . b. NUMBER OF COLORS (1) The number of colors used for NIA N/A coding should be kept to the mini-mum needed for providing suf-ficient information. -c2> The number of colors used for NIA N/A coding should not exceed 11.

• 127 TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 18 of 19.

• I I i! I I GUIDELINE

1. *~ '1 .., 6.5.1.6 (Cont'd) c. MEANING OF COLORS (1) The meaning attached to a partic-NIA NIA ular color should be narrowly defined. (2) Red, green, and amber (yellow) NIA NIA should be reserved for the following uses: Red: unsafe, danger, immediate NIA NIA operator action required, or an indication that a critical para-meter is out of tolerance.

Green: safe, no operator action NIA NIA required, or an indication that a parameter is within tolerance. Amber (yellow): hazard (poten-NIA NIA tially unsafe), caution, attention required, or an indication that a

• marginal value or parameter exists. . e. PRINCIPLES OF COLOR SELECTION (1) The primary principle which NIA NIA should be applied in selecting colors for coding purposes which do not have the immediate safety implications of red, green, and amber is to ensure that each color is recognized as different from any other. Exhibit 6.5-7 lists 22 colors of maximum contrast.

Each successive color has been selected so that it will contrast .maximally with the color just preceding it and satisfactorily with earlier colors in the list. . The first 9 colors have been selected so as to yield satisfac-tory contrast for red-green-deficient as well as color-normal

• ,
• 128
• **
• TABLE 3-10 CONTROLS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 19 of 19 s:i 1t-$ It~ -~ ... ! I g; ii !f GUIDELINE I If $ I I , ...--------_.;;.------------+-~f---+-------+----f

._..-------;

6.5.1.&e(l) (Cont'd) observers. The remaining 13 colors are useful only for normal observers. (2) Colors selected for coding should contrast well with the background on which they appear. (3) Ambient lighting in the area in which color coding is used will influence the apparent color of the coded element (especially for surface colors). Each color selected for coding should.be evaluated under all illumination conditions under which it is used. 6.8.3.1 SEPARATION OF CONTROLS Recommended minimum control ration distances are shown in Exhibits 6.8-2 and 6.8-3. In most cases, control room ations will require greater separation. The function requirements that should be sidered are: a. b. c. ACCESS -Control access should not be impeded by any position of an cent control. INADVERTENT ACTUATION -Control actuation should not result in advertent actuation of an adjacent control. SIMULTANEOUS ACTUATION -Simultaneously actuation of adjacent controls (where required) should be possible . 129 N/A N/A N/A N/A I YES I NO 20A03059 1-2 I NO 20003016 II-6

• *
• 3.11 Displays Survey This section documents the results of the displays survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.11.1 Objectives The objectives of the displays survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which all displays in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify and document any features of the displays that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.11.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the display design in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The display topics evaluated include:

• Display failure
• Usability of displayed values
• Readability
• Printing on the display face
• Scale markings
• Coding
• Display movement
• Scale pointers
• Zone markings
• Light indicators (legend and simple)
• Legend design
• Trend recorders
• CRT displays were evaluated as part of the computer survey. Several NUREG-0700 guidelines appropriate to displays are addressed as part of task analysis and task verification and validation activities.

These guidelines have been incorporated into the verification and validation evaluation reports

• 130 3.11.3 Criteria
• The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, *
• are: paragraphs 6.5.Llf; 6.5.1.2d(l) through e; 6.5.1.3a through c(l) and d(l) through d(6); 6.s.1:4a(l) through f; 6.5.1.5a through c and e and f; 6.5.1.6a through c(2) and d(3) through* e(3); 6.5.2.la through c; s*.s.2.2a(l) through c; 6.5.2.3a through c; 6.5.2.4a through c(3); 6.5.2.5c; 6.5.3.la(l) through c(l) and d; 6.5.3.2a(l), a(3), and b; 6.5.3.3a(l) through b(7); 6.5.4.la through d and g through k; 6.5.4.2a(l) through b(4); 6.5.5.la(l) through c(2); 6.5.5.2a(l}

through c; and 6.5.3.3c. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-11. 3.11.4 Method 3.11.4.1 Data Collection

a. Data collected during the operator interviews were reviewed to identify potential problems with the design, location, or information content of the CR displays.

b. Data were collected using the checklists from the displays task plan. Data were collected primarily through operator interviews and direct observation of displays in the CR. As necessary, measurements were made of the physical characteristics (e.g., characterize, height-to-width ratios, etc.) of CR displays.

Where guidelines refer to consistency with operating procedures (e.g., 6.5.1.4.e), existing procedures were reviewed.

c. Data were recorded on the appropriate forms. 3.11.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:

a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the ment or instruments involved (e.g., legend lights, meters, chart recorders, etc.), a description of the problem including the N.UREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the displays task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3.11.5 Findings The findings of the displays survey are presented in Table 3-11, "Displays Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." A tota~ of 109 criteria were applied to the displays in the 131

• *
• Surry control room. Of these, 9 (8%) were not applicable, 53 (49%) were in compliance, and 47 (43%) were not in compliance.

A total of 108 HEDs were generated which document all of the 47 criteria which were not met. In general, those HEDs address display labeling, usability, readability, adequacy of information presentation and methods of inf~rmation presentation. Table 3-11 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED

• 132 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 1 OF 16
• y;~; h 7 I § ,t; ~--~ r1 # I ~-I it GUIDELINE " . 6.5.1.1 INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED f, DISPLAY FAIL URE -When panel I NO 20A02203 CPT instruments, such as meters, fail or 22A02030 CPT become inoperative, the failure should 22A02056 CPT be apparent to the operator (e.g., 22A02057 CPT through off-scale indication).

22A02058 11-6 6.5.1.2 USABILITY OF DISPLAYED V ALUm; d. SCALE RANGE -Scales should be selected to: (1) Span the expected range of opera-I NO 20002006 CPT tional parameters, or 20A02201 1-3 20A02209 Il-5 20A02210 1-2 20A02211 IIl-7 20A02212 1-2 20A02213 IIl-9 20A02214 Il-6 20A02215 1-2 20A02216 II-5

• 20A02217 II-5 20A02218 II-5 20A02219 11-5 20A02232 CPT 20A02236 11-6 20A02241 Il-6 22A02078 IIl-7 22A02079 Il-7 (2) . Employ appropriate scale ranging I NO 20A02201 1-3 *techniques, or 20A02209 Il-5 20A02210 1-2 20A02211 Ill-7 20A02212 1-2 20A02213 IIl-9 20A02214 11-6 20A02215 1-2 20A02216 Il-5 20A02217 11-5 20A02218 Il-5 20A02219 Il-5 *,
• 133 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDS GENERATED PAGE 2 OF 16

• II~&! la I I Eo tt; , GUIDELINE I $/ i' "* 6.5.1.2 (Cont'd) (3) Be supported by auxiliary wide-I NO 20A02202 11-6 range instruments.

20A02204 11-6 20A02205 1-1 20A02206 Il-6 20A02207 Il-7 20A02208 11-6 22A02034 CPT 22A02080 II-7 22A02081 CPT 22A02082 1-2 e. SCALE SIZE -Scale ranges may be 0 YES expanded (or contracted) by multiplying or dividing indicated scale values by powers of ten. All such scales should be clearly marked as to whether the indicated values should be multiplied or divided, and the factor involved (e.g., 10, 100, 1000). 6.5.1.3 READABILITY

• a. CHARACTER HEIGHT -Character 0 NO 20A01136 II-5 height should subtend a minimum visual angle of 15 minutes, or 0.004 x viewing distance.

The preferred visual angle is 20 minutes, or 0.006 x viewing distances.

b. TYPE STYLE -Exhibits 6.5-1 and 6.5-2 present two recommended sets of characters, character size and style should meet the 'following:

(1) Type styles should be simple. 0 YES (2) Type styles should be consistent. 0 NO 22A02022 CPT (3) Only upper-case letters should be 0 YES used. c. CONTRAST -Highest contrast is provided by black and white. (1) Visual displays should normally 0 NO. 22A02220 11-6 contain black markings on a white background .

• 134 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINOINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 3 OF 16 * ~-; I I / # § ;:: # # -~, GUIDELINE " " 'Ii' 6.5.1.3 (Cont'd) (2) The use of color should be consis-0 NO 22A02220 II-6 -tent with the recommendations of Guideline 6.5.1.6. Color' combina-tions should be selected to pro-vide good contrast.

d, CHARACTER DIMENSIONS AND SPACING -(1) Stroke-width-to-character-height M YES ratios shot,tld be between 1:6 and 1:8. (2) Letter width-to-height ratios M YES should be between 1:1 and 3:5. (3) Numeral width-to-height ratios M YES should be 3:5. (4) Minimum space between char-M YES acters should be one stroke width * * (5) Minimum space between words M YES should be the width of one character. (6) Minimum space between lines M YES should be on-half the character height. 6.5.1.4 PRINTING ON THE DISPLAY FACE a. PROVISION OF NEEDED MESSAGE -If any information is required to use the display, it must be provided close enough to the scale so that the scale and the message are clearly associated. The message may be communicated: (1) By printing on the display face. 0 YES (2) . By an appropriate label adjacent 0 NO 22A02234 II-7 to the display. b. AVOIDANCE OF EXTRANEOUS 0 NO 22A02223 CPT ITEMS -Categories of information not *-. needed in using the display should be avoided (e.g., patent notices, manu-facturer's trademark or address) * .

• 135 -------------------------------------

---

TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 4 OF 16 * ~-; I I /j ... *~ ft ,f I' I # GUIDELINE " c1 , 6.5.1.4 (Cont'd) C, BREVITY -To avoid distraction and 0 YES interference with the needed essential markings, messages should be written as briefly as clarity permits. d. ABBREVIATIONS -Only standard and 0 YES commonly accepted abbreviations should be used. e. CONSISTENCY WITH 0 YES PROCEDURES -The printed message should use the same terms as the procedures in display identification, parameter identification, and units displayed. f, INDICATION OF TRANSFORMATIONS 0 YES NEEDED -Where necessary to multi-ply or divid~ the displayed readings by powers of 10 to determine quantitative value, the operation required and result

• derived must be clearly indicated
• 6.5.1.5 SCALE MARKINGS a. USE OF GRADUATIONS

-Scales for quantitative reading should be provided with graduations consistent with the progression of their numerals. (1) No more than 9 graduations 0 NO 22A02222 II-6 should separate numerals. (2) Major and minor graduations 0 NO 22A02023 II-6 should be used if there are up to four graduations between numerals. (3) Major, intermediate, and minor 0 NO 22A02024 . II-6 graduation should be used if there 22A02025 II-6 are five or more graduations . between numerals .

• 136 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & BEDS GENERATED PAGE 5 OF 16 * /JV/'/ /// I I I # IIUIDELlliE I GI I ,I " 6.5.1.5 (Cont'd) b. GRADUATION HEIGHT -Graduation M YES heights as a function of viewing \ distance should be: c. VALUES INDICATED BY UNIT 0 NO 20A02228 Il-7 GRADUATIONS

-Successive values 23002014 Il-7 indicated by unit graduations should be 23002043 11-5 one of those shpwn below or those 23002244 CPT values multiplied by some power of 10. e. LINEAR VS LOGARITHMIC SCALES -0 YES Logarithmic scales should be avoided

• unless needed to display a large range of values. f. MULTISCALE INDICATORS -Multi-I NO 20A02003 Il-5 Table values scale indicators (i.e., single pointer, 20A02015 Il-5 needed for multiple scales) should be avoided 20A02016 11-5 6.5.1.5b and c. unless they can be justified as of opera-20A02017 11-7 tional benefit, and precautions are taken to avoid operator *confusion.

6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING a. REDUNDANCY -In all applications of 0 YES color coding, color should provide redundant information., That is, the pertinent information should be avail-able from some other cue in addition to color. b. NUMBER OF COLORS -(1) The number of colors used for 0 YES coding should be kept to the mini-mum needed for providing suf-ficient information. (2) The number of colors used for 0 YES coding should not exceed 11. *

• 137 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDS GENERATED PAGE 6 OF 16

• V/1 Ill I I ;s # I it1I GU_IDELINE " ,(' 41 .. 6.5.1.6 (Cont'd) C, MEANING OF COLORS (1) The meaning attached to, a par-0 YES ticular color should be r<arrowly defined. (2) Red, green, and amber (yellow) N/A N/A should be reserved for the fol-lowing uses: Red: unsafe, danger, im*mediate N/A NIA operator a*ction required, or an indication that a critical param-eter is out of tolerance.

Green: safe, no operator action NIA NIA required, or an indication that a parameter is within tolerance. Amber (yellow): hazard NIA NIA (potentially unsafe), caution,

• attention required, or an indica-tion that a marginal value of parameter exists. e. PRINCIPLES OF COLOR SELECTION (1) The primary principle which NIA NIA should be applied in selecting colors for coding purposes which do not have the immediate safety implications of red, green, and amber is to ensure that each color is recognized as different from any other. Exhibit 6.5-7 lists 22 colors of maximum contrast.

Each successive color has been selected so that it will contrast maximally with the color just preceding it and satisfactorily with earlier colors in the list. . The first 9 colors have been selected so as to yield satis-factory contrast for red-green-deficient as well as color-normal observers. The remaining 13 colors are useful only for color-normal observers .

• 138 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GE~ERA,-ED PAGE 7 OF 16 * ~&/ ~/ I #
• I , IUIDELINE I 15 $/ I , , .. 6.5.1.6e. (Cont'd) (2) Colors selected tor coding should N/A N/A contrast well with the background on which they appear. (3) Ambient lighting in the area in N/A N/A which color coding is used will influence the apparent color of the coded element(especially for surface colors). Each color selected for coding should be evaluated under all illumination conditions under which it is used. 6.5.2.1 DIRECTIONALITY OF MOVEMENT AND NUMBERING WITH FIXED-SCALE AND MOVING-POINTER METERS a .. CIRCULAR SCALES -Scale values 0 NO 22A02224 CPT should increase with clockwise move-ment of the pointer as in Exhibit 6.5-8. b. VERTICAL STRAIGHT SCALES -Scale 0 NO 22A02225 CPT
• values should increase with upward movement of the pointer as in Exhibit 6.5-9. c. HORIZONTAL STRAIGHT SCALES -0 YES Scale values should increase with pointer movement to the right as in Exhibit 6.5-10. 6.5.2.2 POINTERS a. POINTER TIP FORM -(1) Pointer tips should be simple. 0 YES Examples of preferred and non-preferred types are given in Exhibit 6.5-11. (2) Pointer tips should be selected to 0 NO 22A02026 CPT minimize concealment of scale 22A02226 Il-7 graduation marks or numerals. (See Exhibit 6.58.)
• TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & BEDS GENERATED PAGE 8 OF 16 * ~&! ~/ I § $ I I $/ ! ,f fiUIDELIIIE 6.5.2.2 (Cont'd) b. POINTER POSITIONING RELATIVE TO SCALE-(1) Pointer tip should extend to 0 NO 20A02038 CPT within about 1/16 inch of (but not overlap) the smallest graduation marks on the scale. (See Exhibits 6.5-8, -9,-10.) (2) Pointers should be mounted to 0 YES avoid parallax errors. c. POINTER VISIBILITY

-Pointer/ I NO 20A02004 Il-7 background contrast and pointer size 0 22A02227 CPT should be adequate to permit rapid recognition of pointer position. 6.5.2.3 ZONE MARKING (Exhibit 6.5-12) a. Zone markings should be conspicuous 0 NO 23A02242 11-7 and distinctively different for different zones .

• b. Zone marking should not interfere with 0 NO 20A02229 11-7 reading of quantitative markings.

c. If color is used for coding, color should 0 NO 20A02229 Il-7 be related to meaning as given in Guideline 6.5.1. 6.c. r: 6.5.2.4 ORIENTATION OF MARKINGS ON FIXED-SCALE METERS a. NUMERAL ORIENTATION -Individual 0 NO 22A02089 CPT numerals on any type of fixed scale 22A02047 11-6 should be vertical (see Exhibit 6.5-13). This holds true for circular as well as linear scales. b. ZERO-POINT ORIENTATION

-(1) Where pointer movement is more NIA NIA than 3600, the zero point should be located at the 12 o'clock position. (2) Where positive and negative 0 YES values are displayed around a zero or null position, the zero or null point should be located at the 12

• o'clock position . 140 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 9 OF 16 * %~/ ~7 I # . .:5 -~ I I GUIDELINE I! qi: 6.5.2.4 (Cont'd) c. END-POINT INDICATION ON PAR'l1AL-REVOLUTION SCALES -I (1) Where the scale covers 1 less than a 0 YES full rotation of the pointer, scale end-points should be indicated by a break in scale (see Exhibit 6.5-13). (2) The break should be at least one 0 YES numbered_

interval iri length. (3) The break should be oriented at 0 YES the 6 o'clock position. 6.5.2.5 MOVING-SCALE METERS Moving-scale fixed-pointer meters are infre-0 YES NOTE: CETC quently seen in nuclear power plant control moving scale is rooms. They should be avoided in favor of necessary due to the more effective fixed-scale moving-numerous values

• pointer types . on scale. 6.5.3.1 CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS

.. b. PRECAUTIONS TO ASSURE I NO 20A02301 11-7 UNAMBIGUOUS SENSING BY OPERATORS -Lights should not appear to be glowing when in fact they are off, or vice versa. To that end, ambient light sources should be selected, located, or controlled to avoid reflections or refractions. (See Guideline 6.1.5.3.)

c. PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID MISINTERPRETATION

-(1) System/equipment status should I NO 20A02302 1-2 be inferred by illuminated indica-20A02303 Il-5

• tors, and never by the absence of 20A02304 CPT illumination.

20A02307 11-5 20A02315 III-9 20B12305 Il-6 20B22306 II-6

• 141 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 10 OF 16 * ~&! ~I I § ~* # GUIDELINE I I .~ " 41' CJ " 6.5.3.1 (Cont'd} d. USE AS ALERTING INI;>ICATORS

-0 YES Alerting the operator to unfavorable status should be a function of the annunciator system and not assigned to light indicators. 6.5.3.2 DESIGN AND USE OF NONLEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS

a. IDENTIFICATION OF MEANING -(1) Where meaning is not apparent, 0 NO 22A01138 CPT labeling must be provided close to 22A01151 II-5 the light indicator showing the 22A02310 CPT message intended by its glowing. 22A02311 n-s 22A02312 III-9 22A02313 II-5 22A02314 II-5 22B01142 III-9 (3) The color of the light should be

• clearly identifiable . b. LIGHT INTENSITY

-The illuminated 0 NO 20A02301 II-7 indicator should be at least 1096 greater in light intensity than the surrounding panel (as measured by a spot photom-eter). 6.5.3.3 DESIGN AND USE OF LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS C a. VISIBILITY FACTORS -(1} Light intensity of the illuminated 0 NO 20.t\02309 1-5 indicators should be at least 1096 greater than the surrounding panel (as measured by a spot photometer). (2) Legends should be legible under 0 YES ambient illumination with indica-tor lights off. (3) Legend lettering should contrast 0 YES well with background under both ambient and transilluminated lighting .

• 142 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 11 OF 16
• j'j'i ~7 I I; $ 11 # I # GUIDELINE 6.5.3.3 (Cont'd} b. LEGEND DESIGN {1} General legend design should be 0 YES consistent throughout the control
• room. (2) Lettering should be simple, and 0 NO 22A02022 CPT should follow Guideline 6.5.1.3 for style and size. (3) Symbolic legends should be clear 0 YES and unambiguous as to their meaning. (4) Text should be short, concise, and 0 YES unambiguous.

(5) Legend messages should contain 0 NO 22A02308 Il-6 no more than three lines of text. (6) Nomenclature and abbreviations 0 NO 22A01121 Il-6 should be standard, and consistent

• with usage throughout the control room and in the procedures. ( 7) Legends should be worded to tell 0 YES the status indicated by glowing of the light. c. DISTINGUISHABILITY FROM LEGEND 0 NO 22A01218 CPT PUSHBUTTONS

-Illuminated legend. indicators should be readily distinguishable from legend pushbuttons by form, size, or other factors. d. COLOR CODING -The color of the legend background under transillumina-NIA N/A Covered in tion should conform to the general color code established for the control Section 3.13, room. (See Guideline 6.5.1.6) Conventions. See 6.5.16c in Table 3-13 .

• 143 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & BEDS GENERATED PAGE 12 OF 16
• 1///,1/1/ , &UIDELINE , 6.5.4.1 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS

a. QUALITY OF EXPENDABLE I NO 20A02403 II-6 MATERIALS

-Pens, inks, and paper 23A02415 II-6 should be of a quality to provide clear, 20A02404 II-6 distinct, and reliable marking. For example, ink should not clog pens or smudge on the paper. b, SCALE COMPATIBILITY -Scales 0 NO 22A02409 I-2 printed on* the recording paper should be the same as the scales shown on the recorder.

c. SCALE DESIGN -Recorder scales 0 NO 22A02222 II-6 should be numbered and marked 0 22A02023 II-6. according to the general principles of 0 22A02024 Il-6 scale graduation (Guideline 6.5.1.5), 0 22A02025 11-6 with number style and dimensions 0 20Aoioa9 Il-6 according to Guidelines 6.5.1.3 and . 0 22A02221 CPT 6.5.1.4.

• d . PAPER TAKEUP AND CUTOFF -A 0 YES takeup spool should be provided to receive completed recordings.

On most instruments this is provided as an

• inherent part of the design. Also, means should be provided for tearing off completed records for storage. g. ' USE -As a general rule, recorders I !NO 20A02005 11-6 should be used to record trend informa-20A02035 11-6 tion and material which may be needed .I 20A02043 1;_5 for later reference.

I 20A02044 1-4 I 20A02045 1-1 I 20A02046 1-2 I 20A02049 1-3 I 20A02050 11-6 I 20A02051 11-6 h. PLACEMENT OF RECORDERS -As I NO 20A02401 Ill-8 devices which must be verified and I 20A02414 1-2 attended by the operator, graphic recorders should in principle be located within the primary operating _area rather than on back panels. '

• 144 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & BEDS GENERATED PAGE 13 OF 16
• IIUIDELINE 11! 1/ll I I , I $ ,I _, 6.5.4.1 (Cont'd) i; PAPER-SPEED ADJUSTABILITY -Not 0 NO 23002406 1-2 only should high paper speed option be provided to run out records for detach-ment, but a selection of lower speeds should be available to permit adjust-ment of the time scale so that rate-of-change information can be indicated.

j. ANNOTATION

-It should be con-0 YES venient to .annotate recordings with date and time markings, with paper speed if varied from normal, with parameter identification, or with any other relevant information. -k. VISIBILITY -Recorder design should I NO 20A02402 Il-6 ensure that all data will be visible through the window of the recorder and not require* open-door operation to expose it. 6.5.4.2 SPECIFIC RECORDER TYPES .

• a. CONTINUOUS RECORDERS

-(1) LABELING -Labels should 0 YES identify the parameters recorded. With multiple-pen recorders, parameters should be listed in the order of the associated scales on the recorder. (2) INK COLORS -Each pen should *o NO 20A02410 Ii-6 use a different colored ink to permit channel identification from line color. Colors selected should be distinctively different and should afford good contrast with the paper. b. DISCRETE RECORDERS -(1) CHANNEL OVERLOAD -The recorder should not be loaded 0 YES beyond its designed channel capacity because this adds com-plexity to the analysis and pro-longs sampling cycle time .

• 145 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 14 OF 16
• Jjf. J:/ I Ii . # g: /!Iii
• le; GUIDELINE I l $/ $ ct" 6.5.4.2b (Cont'd) (2) CHANNEL IDENTIFICATION ON 0 YES INSTRUMENT

-. Discrete recorders should be equipped to display an easily viewed manner the channel being plotted. Viewing from odd and incon-' venient angles should not be imposed. (3) CHANNEL IDENTIFICATION ON 0 ~o 20A02411 11-6 RECORDING -Number-printing mechanism should be designed and maintained to provide clear, sharp, and small numbering to avoid crowding of data and conse-quent analysis problems. (4) CHANNEL SELECTION I N°O 20A02405 III-8 CAP ABILITY -Provision should I 20A02408 III-9 be made. to select any single

• channel for immediate display without awaiting completion of a sampling cycle. 6.5.5.1 DRUM-TYPE COCNTERS a. NUMERICAL PRESENTATION FACTORS -\ (1) ORIENTATION

-Multidigit 0 ~ES numbers formed by several counter drums should be read horizontally from left to right (see Exhibit 6.5'-14). (2) WIDTH-HEIGHT RATIO -To M "ES compensate for the distortion imposed by the curved surface of the drum, counter numerals should reflect a width-height ratio* of 1:1, not 3:5 as recom-.mended for numerals and other displays .

• 146 TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

BEDS GENERATED PAGE 15 OF 16 * ~/. hi I § #; rf !f! # I! I l:i I

• GUIDELINE " "' !j~ J 6.5.5.la (Cont'd) (3) GROUPING OF NUMERALS -If 0 NO 22A02501 I-5 more than* four digits are required, they should be,grouped and the groupings sepal'ated as appropriate by commas, by a decimal point, or by additional space (see Exhibit 6.5-15). (4) CONTRAST -The color of the 0 NO 22A02502 CPT numerals and of the background should be chosen to yield high contrast.
  • s1ack numerals on white drum surface is recommended.

(5) DRUM FINISH -The surface of 0 YES the drums and surrounding areas should have a .matte finish to minimize glare. b . MOUNTING -* (1) Drum-type counters are clearly 0 NO 20A02503 1-5 readable only within a viewing angle that is more restrictive. than for most displays. Accordingly, they should be

• mounted perpendicular to the opera tor's line of sight. (2) Counters should be mounted as 0 NO 20A02503 I-5 close as possible to the panel surface to minimize shadows and maximize viewing angle. (3) The window should be sized to 0 YES allow no more than one digit per drum to appear in the window at any one time. C, DR UM MOVEMENT -(1) Numbers should change by snap 0 YES action rather than through con-tinuous movement.

(2) The counter drums should move YES upward with increasing values . 0

• 147
• *
• TABLE 3-11 DISPLAYS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDS GENERATED PAGE 16 OF 16 GUIDELINE 6.5.5.2 ELECTRONIC COUNTERS a. NUMERICAL PRF.SENTATION FACTORS -(1) I ORIENTATION

-Multidigit counters should be oriented to read horizontally from left to right. (2) CHARACTER STYLE -Simple character fonts should be used. Styles using variable stroke widths, slanted characters, etc., should be avoided. (3) NUMERAL HEIGHT -Numerals should be of such a height as to subtend a visual angle of 15 minutes from the farthest antici-pated viewing distance. (4) WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT RATIO -Width-to-height ratio of numerals should be approximately 3:5. (5) SP ACING -Horizontal spacing between numerals should be between one-quarter and one-half the numeral width. b. RATE OF CHANGE -Numerals should not follow each other faster than two per second when the opera tor is expected to read the numerals consecutively.

c. CONTRAST -Character-to-background

• contrast ratio should be between 15:1 minimum and 20:1 preferred . 148 1// *1i7 I I " /:1 0 YES 0 YES M YES M YES M YES 0 YES M YES I # ,
• *
• 3.12 Labels and Location Aids Survey This section documents the results of the labels and location aids survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.12.1 Objectives The o~jectives of the labels and location aids survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which all labels and location aids in the control room conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify and document any features of the labels and location aids that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.12.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the labels and location aids in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:

• Labeling of .annunciator panels.
• Color* coding of labels
• Need for labeling
• Hierarchical labeling
• Placement of labels
• Mounting of labels
• Spatial orientation of labels
• Label visibility
• Label content
• Word selection
• Consistency
• Symbols
• Control position labeling
• Label readability
• Temporary labels
• Demarcation
• Mimics . 149
• *
• 3.12.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.3.3.3c(3);

6.5.1.6a through e; 6.6.1.1, 6.6.1.2a and b; 6.6.2.la through f; 6.6.2.2a and b; 6.6.2.3a and b; 6.6.2.4a through d; 6.6.3.la through e; 6.6.3.5; 6.6.3.6, 6.6.3. 7a and b; 6.6.3.Sa through c; 6.6.5.la through h; 6.6.5.2a and b; 6.6.6.2a _through c; 6.6.6.3; 6.6.6.4a and b; and 6.8.3.2d. 3.12.4 Method 3.12.4.1 Data Collection

a. Data were collected using the checklists from the labels and location aids task plan. Data were collected primarily through interviews with operators and direct observation of the CR labeling.

As necessary, measurements were made of the physical characteristics (e.g., character size and separation, height-to-width ratios, etc.) of the CR labels. For those guidelines related to consistency with operating procedures (e.g., 6.6.3.3.c), operating procedures were reviewed.

b. Data were recorded on the appropriate data collection forms. 3.12.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:

a

• b. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the labels involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the labels task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3.12.5 Findings The findings of the labels and location aids survey are presented in Table 3-12, "Labels Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 111 criteria were applied to the labels and location aids in the Surry control room. Of these, 3 (3%) were not applicable, 46 (41 %) were in compliance, and 62 (56%) were not in compliance. A total of 49 HEDs were generated which document all of the 62 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address label content, temporary labels, lack of a hierarchical labeling scheme, spatial orientation, word selection, symbol meaning, position labeling, color usage, nonstandard abbreviations, readability of labels, and lack of demarcation . 150

• *
• Table 3-12 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings.

Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED

• 151
• * * ----------

TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 13 &UIDHINE 6.3.3.3 ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES c. LABELING OF AXES (1) The vertical and horizontal axes of annunciator panels should be labeled with alphanumerics for ready coordinate designation of a particular visual tile. (2) Coordinate designation is red on the left and top sides of the annunciator panel. (3) Letter height for coordinate designation should be consistent with a subtended visual angle of at least 15 minutes as viewed from a central position within the primary operating area. 6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING a. REDUNDANCY -In all applications of color coding, color should provide redundant information. That is, the pertinent information should be available from some other cue in addition to color. b. NUMBER OF COLORS (1) The number of colors used for coding should be kept to the mum needed for providing sufficient information. (2) The number of colors used for coding should not exceed 11. c. MEANING OF COLORS (1) The meaning attached to a particular color should be narrowly defined . 152 M YES 0 YES M YES I IYES I IYES 0 IYES I IYES I

• *
• TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 13 6.5.1.6c. (CON'rD) (2) Red, green, amber (yellow) should be reserved for the following uses: Red: unsafe, danger, immed-* iate opera tor action required, or an indication that a critical parameter is out of tolerance.

Green: safe, no operator action required, or an cation that a parameter is within tolerance. Amber (yellow): hazard (potentially unsafe), caution, attention required, or an cation that a marginal value or parameter exists. d. CONSISTENCY OF MEANING (3) The meaning of a particular color should remain the same both within and among the various ,systems to which it is applied. e. PRINCIPLES OF COLOR SELECTION (1) The primary principle which should be applied in selecting colors for coding purposes which do not have the immediate safety implications of red, green, and amber is to ensure that each color is recognized as different from any other. Exhibit 6.5-7 lists. 22 colors of maximum contrast. Each successive color has been selected so that it will contrast maximally with the color just . preceding it and satisfactorily with earlier colors in the list. The first 9 colors have been selected so as to yield satisfactory contrast for red-green-deficient as well as color-normal observers. The remaining 13 colors are useful only for color-normal observers . 153 I NO I !YES 0 !YES 22A01301 1-3 22A01306 11-7 22A01307 11-7 22A01308 1-1

• *
• TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 13 ____________ _.:G:.:,;UID:.:E:.:LIN:.:E~---------+__;~;.. 1 1-~--'--_1.,./. __ 4i'_~___;,;.."~/a-...;s_ 8_~,.../ ____ ,_,_~ __ -1/ . 6.5.l.6e. (CONT'D) (2) Colors selected for coding should contrast well with the background on which they appear. 1 .f (3) Ambient lighting in the area in which color coding is used will influence the apparent color of* the coded element (especially for surface colors). Each color selected for coding should be evaluated _under all illumination conditions

• under which it is used. 6.6.1.1 NEED FOR LABELING Controls, displays, and other equipment items that must be located, identified, or lated should be appropriately and clearly labeled to permit rapid and accurate human performance.

6.6.1.2 HIERARCHICAL SCHEME To reduce confusion, operator search time, and redundancy, a hierarchical labeling should be used. (See Exhibit 6.6-1.) a. RANKING (1) Major labels should be used to identify major systems or opera tor work stations. (2) Subordinate labels should be used to identify subsystems or func-tional groups. (3) Component labels should be used to identify each discrete panel or co.nsole element. (4) . Labels should not repeat informa-tion contained in higher-level labels . 154 0 YES 0 YES I NO 0 0 0 0 YES 0 NO 0 NO 0 NO 0 NO 20 AOll 01 11-6 22A01145 11-6 22A01146 11-6 22A01149 11-6 22A01108 11-6 22A01109 11-6 22A01110 11-6 22A011li 11-6 TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 13 * ~/. I I I I I' i! I I $~# I # IUIDEllNE Ii 6.6.1.2 (CONT'D) b. LETTER GRADATION$ -Labels should be graduated in letter size such that: (1) System/work station labels are 0 NO 22AOI112 Il-6 about 2596 larger than (2) Subsystem/functional group labels 0 NO 22A01112 Il-6 which are about 2596 larger than (3) Component labels which are about 0 NO 22A01112 Il-6 2596 larger than _ (4) Control position identifiers. 0 NO 22A01112 ll-6 6.6.2.1 ,PLACEMENT

a. NORMAL PLACEMENT

-Labels 0 NO . 22A01114 II-6 should be placed above the panel ele-ment(s) they describe. _ b. PANEL LABELING"- The placement 0 NO 22A01114 Il-6 of labels on control panels should con-form to the guidance shown in Exhibit

• 6.6-1. -c. VISIBILITY ENHANCEMENT

.....;. Labels 0 NO 22AOI114 Il-6 of elements located above eye level should be positioned to ensure label visibility.

d. PROXIMITY

-Labels should be placed 0 YES close to the panel element. See_ Exhibit 6.6-2. e. LABELS ON CONTROLS -Labels I YES should not appear on the control itself when an adjustment or manipulation is required that causes the operator's hand to *obscure the label for an extended time period. f. ADJACENT LABELS -Adjacent labels _ should be separated by sufficient space 0 YES so that they are not read as one continuous labeL See Exhibits 6.6-3 and 6~6-4. 6.6.2.2 MOUNTING a. INTEGRITY-Label should be mounted 0 YES in such a way as to preclude accidental

• removaL 155 TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 13 * /JV/I I 7 G ~. § ~* # # I GUIDELINE e ;r 4! 6.6.2.2 (CONT'D) b. SURF ACE -Labels should be mounted 0 YES on a fiat surface. I 6.6.2.3 SPA'ffAL OB.IENTA'l10N / a. HORIZONTAL ORIENTATION (1) Labels should be oriented horizon-0 NO 22A01117 CPT tally so that they may be read quickly and easily from left to right. (2) Although not normally recom-0 YES mended, vertical orientation may be used only where space is limited. b. CURVED PATTERNS -Curved pat-0 NO 22A01118 CPT terns of labeling should be avoided *. See Exhibit 6.6-5.

• 6.6.2.4 VISIBILITY

a. OTHER INFORMATION SOURCES -0 YES Labels should not cover any other infor-. matiori source. They should not detract from or obscure figures or scales which must be read by. the opera tor. b. CONCEALMENT

-"-Labels should not 0 YES be covered or obscured by other units in the equipment assembly.

c. CONTROLS -Labels should be visible I YES to the operator during control actu.a-tion. d. CLEANING -Administrative proce-0 NO 22A01140 III-8 dures should be in place for the periodic cleaning of labels. 6.6.3.1 KINDS OF INFORMATION

a. PRIMARY FUNCTION -Labels should I NO 20A01101 II-6 describe the function of equipment items. b. SECONDARY FUNCTION --If needed NIA NIA for clarity, engineering characteristics

• or nomenclature may also be described
• 156 TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERA TED Page 6 of 13
• y;~; I I # ,;:: # I I # GUIDELINE " ;:/ ., 6.6.3.2 WORD SELECTION

a. INTENDED ACTION --:'Ille words 0 NO 23003067 CPT employed in the label should express exactly what action is intended.

b. CLARITY -Instructions should be I NO 20A01101 II-6 clear. c. DIRECT -Instructions should be I NO 20A01101 II-6 direct. d. MEANING -Words should be used that I NO 20A01102 CPT have a commonly accepted meaning for all intended users. e. TECHNICAL TERMS -Unusual tech-I NO 20A01102 CPT nical terms should be avoided. f. SPELLING -Words should be correctly 0 NO 22A01120 II-6 spelled. 6.6.3.3 CONSISTENCY

• b. INTERNAL CONSISTENCY

-Labels 0 NO 22A01121 Il-6 should be consistent within and across pieces of equipment in their use of. words, acronyms, abbreviations, and part/system numbers. See Exhibit 6.6-6. c. CONSISTENCY WITH PROCEDURES D YES -There should be no mismatch between nomenclature used in pro-cedures and that printed on the labels. 6.6.3.4 SYMBOLS a. MEANING. -Abstract symbols should I NO 20A01102 CPT be used only if they have a commonly accepted meaning for all intended users (e.g., %). b. DISTINGUISHABILITY _: Symbols NIA N/A should be unique and distinguishable from each other. c. STANDARD -A commonly accepted 0 NO *22A01122 II-6 standard configuration should be used. d. CONSISTENCY -Symbols should be

• consistently used within and across panels. 0 NO 22A0112~ 11-6 157
• *
• TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 13 GUIDELINE 6.6.3.4 (CONT'D) ** e. ROMAN NUMERALS -Use of Roman numerals should be avoided. 6.6.3.5 BREVITY Brevity should not be stressed if the results will be unfamiliar to operating personnel. Words on labels should be concise and still convey the in tended meaning. See Exhibit 6.6-7. 6.6.3.6 SIMILARITY Words and abbreviations of similar ance should be avoided where an error in interpretation could result. When labels containing similar words, abbrf:lviations, or acronyms are located in close proximity to each other, different words should be selected or means of coding should be used to reduce the probability of selecting the wrong control or reading .the wrong display. See Exhibit 6.6-8. 6.6.3.7 FUNCTIONAL GROUPS a. FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP -b. .. Labels should be used _to identify tionally grouped controls or displays. LOCATION -Labels should be located above the functional groups they ify. 6.6.3.8 CONTROL POSITION LABELING a. b. c. POSITION -All discrete functional control positions should be identified. DIRECTION -Direction of motion* (increase, *decrease) should be identified for continuous motion rotary controls. VISIBILITY -Control position mation should be visible to the operator during operation of the control

• 158 I NO I NO 0 0 -~ES 0 !YES 0 NO o NO 0 NO O NO 20A01123 Il-6 20A01102 11-6 20A01143 11-6 22 AOll 24 II-6 22A01126 II-6 22A01149 II-6 22A01144 II-5 7 TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 8 of 13
• It~~/ /// I , I I # IIUIDELINE I ,1 I , . -6.6 .. 3.9 ACCESS OPENING, DANGER, WARNING, AND SAFETY INSTRUCTION LABELING a. ACC~ OPENING LABELS -Each N/A N/A access opening used by control room operators should be labeled to identify the function of items accessible through it. b. DANGER, WARNING, AND SAFETY 0 NO 22001139 Il-5 INSTRUCTION LABELS -All danger, warning, and safety instruction labels should be in accordance with appropri-ate safety standards.

6.6.4.1 READABILITY

a. CHARACTER HEIGHT * (1) Character height should subtend a M YES visual angle of 15 minutes as a minimum, or 0.004 x viewing

• distance.

A visual angle of 20 minutes, or 0.006 x viewing dis-tance, is preferred. (2) Letter height should be identical 0 NO 22A01129 II-6 for all labels within the same hierarchical level, based on the maximum viewing distance.

b. CONTRAST (1) To ensure adequate contrast and 0 NO 22A01130 II-6 prevent loss of readability because of dirt, dark characters should be provided on a light background.

(2) If color print is used for coding 0 YES purposes, it should conform to the established color coding scheme for the control room. (See Guide-line 6.5.1.6.) Colors should be chosen for maximum contrast against the label background. Exhibit 6.6-9 rates various color combinations in terms of relative legibility .

• 159 TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 13 * /iy,// h I I § . "" $ I' I I # GUIDELINE q Jr 6.6.4.2 STYLE (Exhibits 6.5~1 and 6.5-2) a. CHARACTER SELECTION (1) Labels should be prepar,ed in capi-0 YES tal letters. (2) The design of letters and numer-0 YES als should be simple and without flourishes or serifs. b. CHARACTER WIDTH (1) Letter width-to-height ratio 0 NO 22A01132 II-6 should be between 1:1 and 3:5. (2) Numeral width-to-height ratio 0 NO 22A01132 II-6 should be 3:5 except for the numeral "4" which should be one stroke width wider and the numeral "1" which should be one : stroke in width. '
• c. STROKE WIDTH -Stroke width-to-0 NO 22A01133 II-6 character height ratio should be between 1:6 and 1:8. d. SPACING (1) The minimum space between 1\1 YES characters should be one stroke width. (2) The minimum space between M YES words should be one character width. (3) The minimum space between lines M NO 22A02308 II-6 should be one-half of the char-acter hefght. 6.6.5.1 USE OF TEMPORARY LABELS a. NECESSITY

-Temporary labels should 0 NO 22A01137 II-6 be used only when necessary.

b. HUMAN FACTORS PRACTICES

-0 NO 22A01137 II-6 Temporary labels should confor*m to **, good human engineering principles .

• 160 TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 10 or 13 * ~7 I l! II If I I GUIDELINE .t (,j J Cli' 6.6.5.1 (CONT'D) C, VISIBILITY -Tempor11ry labels should 0 YES not obscure prior permanent labels unless the old label is to be replaced.

d. IDENTIFICATION

-Tag-out labels I NO 20A01201 II-5 should clearly identify out-of-service 20A03014 II-5 c*omponents and equipment. 0 22A01135 III-8 e. MOUNTING -Tag-outs should be 0 YES securely affixed. f, OBSCURATION -Tag-outs should not obscure the label associated with the nonoperable device. g. ACTIVATION -Tag-outs should be I YES designed to physically prevent actu-ation of a control. h. ADJACENT DEVICES -Tag-outs 0 YES

• should not obscure any adjacent devices or their associated labels. 6.6.5.2 CONTROL OF TEMPORARY LABELS a. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

-0 !No 22A01147 11-5 The use of temporary labels should be administratively controlled.

b. REVIEW PROCEDURES

-A review procedure should be in place that will result in a determination of: (1) when temporary labels are D NO 22A01150 11-5 needed; (2) how they will be used; D !No 22A01150 11-5 (3) their content (given human engi-D tNo 22A01150 11-5 neer"ing requirements); (4) their installation; D INO 22A01150 11-5 (5) the impact of their use on other D INo 22A01150 II-5 system equipment (e.g., annun-**, ciators, mimics);

• 161 TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 11 of 13 .
• jj~~; I I "I! I $ / I GUIDELINE 41, 6.6.5.2b. (CONT'D) (6) documentation requirements; D ' NO 22A01150 II-5 (7) retraining requirementffe; D NO 22A01150 II-5 (8) their periodic review; and D NO 22A01150 Il-5 (9) their removal. D NO 22A01150 II-5 6.6.6.2 DEMARCA'llON (See Exhibit 6.8-1) a. USE -Lines of demarcation can be used to: (1) Enclose functi,onally related dis-0 NO 20A01305 II-5 plays. ' 23A01006 II-6 (2) Enclose functionally related con-0 NO 20A01305 II-5 trols. (3) Group related controls and dis-0 NO 20A01305 11-5 plays .
• b. CONTRAST -Lines of demarcation 0 YES should be visually distinctive from the panel background.

c. PERMANENCE

-Lines of demarca-I YES tion should be .permane11tly attached. 6.6.6.3 COLOR Color should be dedicated to specific func-I NO 20A02304 CPT tions or conditions throughout the control I 20B12305 11-6 room in order for the code to elicit the I 20B22306 11-6 expected operator response. The color cod-* . 0 22A01141 11-5 ing scheme should be used consistently throughout the control room. Refer to Guideline 6.5.1.6 for specific recommenda-tions on the use of color. .

• 162 TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 12 of 13 * ~& ~//7 7 # l! ,f: fif # I I f
• GUIDELINE " " 41 " q: 6.6.6.4 USE OF MIMICS a. COLOR (1) Flow paths should be color coded. 0 NO 22A02602 CPT Colors should be selected in con-formance with Guidelines 6.5.1.6. (2) The mimic colors should be dis-0 YES criminably different from each other. (3) There should be adequate contrast 0 YES between the mimic colors and the panel. (4) Mimic lines depicting flow of the 0 YES same contents (e.g., steam, water, electricity) should be color coded the same throughout the control room. (5) No more than 4 mimic lines of the 0 YES
• same color should run in parallel if the operator must quickly identify any one of the lines. b. MIMIC LINES (1) Differential line widths may be 0 YES used to code flow paths (e.g.,
• significance, volume, level). (2) Overlapping of mimic lines should* 0 YES be avoided. (3) Flow directions should be clearly 0 NO 22A02603 III-9 indicated by distinctive arrow-heads. (4) All mimic origin points should be 0 YES labeled or begin at labeled com-ponents. (5) All mimic destination or terminal 0 NO 22A02604 CPT points should be labeled or end 8:t labeled components.

(6) Component representations on mimic lines shquld be identified . 0 YES

• 163
• *
• TABLE 3-12 LABELS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 13 of 13 11(~~~ I I 11/ ~l I GUIDELINE /' / J I $ I I ; q, __ ..;._ __ _:_.==::::.._ _____ .;::.+--=--1-_:_....::_+-~~-_,;.,_,---; 6.6.6.4 (CON'rD) c. SYMBOLS ( 1) Graphic symbols should be readily understood and commonly used. (2) Symbols should be used consis-tently.

• 6.8.3.2 STRINGS OR CLUSTERS OF SIMILAR COMPONENTS

d. LARGE MATRICES (1) Large matrices of similar ponents should have the nate axes labeled for tion of any single component within the grid.* The left and top sides of the matrix should be used for labeling (see Exhibit 6.8-6) . (2) Large matrices should be divided by appropriate cation . 164 0 YES 0 YES 0 NO 22A02605 CPT 0 INO 22A02605 CPT

• *
• 3.13 Conventions Survey* This section documents the results of the conventions survey conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.13.1 Objectives The objectives of the conventions survey were to: a. Identify the NUREG-0700 defined conventions that are applied in the Surry control room. b. Determine if the applications of the identified conventions are sistent across the applicable design features.

c. Document any inconsistent or missing conventions in the control room. 3.13.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of color, shape, and arrangement coding" across design features in the main control room at Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700.

The topics evaluated include:

• Coding of controls
• Color coding of controls and displays
• Label content consistency
• Enhancement of emergency controls Abbreviations and acronyms used within the control room were addressed in the labeling survey. 3.13.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.3.3.4d; 6.4.2.2a, b, f(l) and f(2); 6.5.1.6b(2), c(2), and d(l) through d(3); 6.5.3.2a(2);

6.6.3.3a; 6.6.6.4c(l) and c(2); 6.8.1.3c and d The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-13. 3.13.4 Method 3.13.4.1 Data Collection

a. All required data forms, plant documentation, engineering drawings, equipment, and materials were made available prior to conduct of this 165

• *
• task. Permission was obtained for all requited access to the control room. b. Data were collected using methods and procedures consisting of vations and document reviews. c. Administrative procedures were reviewed to verify the items listed in the Document Review Checklist in the conventions task plan. 3.13.4.2 Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:

I / a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the nents involved (e.g., controls, meters, labels, etc.), a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the conventions task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

• 3.13.5 Findings The findings of the conventions survey are presented in Table 3-13, "Conventions Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 20 criteria were applied to the conventions in the Surry control room. Of these, 4 (20%) were not applicable, 6 (30%) were in compliance, and 10 (50%) were not in compliance.

A total of 7 HEDs were generated which document all of the 10 criteria which were not met. In general, those HEDs addressed color coding, including meaning and consistency; administrative control over the use of abbreviations; and a lack of enhancement techniques used on emergency controls. Table 3-13 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" means complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED

• 166 TABI..E 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&.

HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 4 * ~&/ la I I h I; § J! I # II II i6 GUIDELINE q;: 6.3.3.4 VISUAL TILE LEGENDS d. ABBREVIATIONS -Abbreviations and 0 NO 22A01303 II-5 in acronyms should be consistent with 20A02105 CPT those used elsewhere in the control room. 6.4.4.1 ROTARY CONTROL DESIGN PRINCIPLES

b. ROTARY CONTROL SHAPE 0 YES CODING -If rotary controls used for . . widely different functions are placed on the same panel, shape coding should be employed.

c. CODING SPECIFICATIONS

-Shape-coded rotary controls should be: (1) Visually identifiable 0 YES (2) Tactually identifiable. 0 YES

• 6.4.2.2 CODING OF CONTROLS (Exhibit 6.4-3} a.* CONSISTENCY

-The coding system 0 YES should be uniform throughout the con-trol room. b. LOCATION CODING -Controls should NIA NIA Covered in be located so as to be easily related to Section 4. 4, functions and functional groupings. Validation. s*ee Controls with similar functions should 6.8.2.3 in Table be in the same location from panel to 4-2. panel. (See Guideline 6.8.2.3.)

f. -COLOR CODING (1) Color coding should follow the 0 NO 22A01301 I-3 recommendations of Guideline 22A01306 II-7 study. 6.5.1.6. 22A01307 II-7 22A01308 1-1 (2) When color coding is used to NIA NIA relate a control to its corre-spending display, the same color should be used for both the con-trol and the display . * .. 167 TABLE 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 4

• V// /// $ !It' !to * ;:: If I I $/ I IUIDELINE 6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING b. NUMBER OF COLORS (2) The number of colors used for 0 YES coding should not exceed 11. c. MEANING OF COLORS (2) Red, green, and amber (yellow) 0 NO 22A01301 1-3 should be reserved for the 22A01306 11-7 following uses: 22A01307 11-7 22A01308 1-1 Red: unsafe, danger, immediate operator action required, or an study. indication that a critical parameter is out of tolerance.

Green: safe, no operator required, or an indication that a study. parameter is within tolerance .

• Amber (yellow):

hazard (potentially unsafe), caution, study. attention required, or an indication that a marginal value or parameter exists. ~-CONSISTENCY OF MEANING (1) The meaning assigned to particu-I NO 20A02304 CPT lar colors should be consistent 0 20B12305 11-6 across all applications within the 20B22306 11-6 control room. 22A01301 1-3 22A01306 11-7 22A01307 11-7 22A01308 1-1 2.3A01004 111-9 (2) The meaning of a particular color 0 NO 20A02304 CPT should remain the same whether 20B12305 Il-6 applied to panel surfaces or pro-20B22306 Il-6 jected in signal lights or on CRTs. 22A01301 1-3 22A01306 Il-7 22AOI307 11-7 22A01308 I-1 23A01004 III-9

• 168 TABLE 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 4 * ~'i / I ,Ii . .... $ # i! I I ii GUIDELINE C. {1 " 6.5.1.6 (CONT'D) (3) The meaning of a particular color I NO 20Ao2304 CPT should remain the same both 0 20B12305 II-6 within and among the various 20B22306 II-6 systems to which it is applied. 22A01301 I-3 22A01306 II-7 22A01307 II-7 22A01308 1-1 23Ao1004 III-9 6.5.3.2 DESIGN AND USE OF NONLEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS

a. IDENTIFICATION OF MEANING (2) The color of the light indicator when transilluminated should 0 NO 22A01301 I-3 study. conform to the general code established for the control room. (See Guideline 6.5.1.6.)

6.6.3.3 LABEL CONTENT CONSISTENCY

• a. *ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL -A list 0 NO 22A01302 I-4 of standard names, acronyms, abbrevia-tions, and part/system numbers should be in place and administratively controlled.

6.6.6.4 USE OF MIMICS c. SYMBOLS (1) Graphic symbols should be readily NIA NIA understood and commonly used. (2) Symbols should be used NIA NIA consistently. 6.8.1.3. ENHANCING RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION -c. COl.iOR SHADING -Color shading 0 YES may be used to enhance recognition of controls, displays, or functional groups. When color shading is used, colors should provide adequate contrast, and should be consistent with other color coding in the control room .

• 169 TABLE 3-13 CONVENTIONS SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 4 * /JYJ~! -7 :, I E-, 9:-§ o:i Ii; 11 # , GUIDELINE " 6.8.1.3 (CONT'D) d. EMERGENCY CONTROLS -Distinc-0 NO 22A01304 II-5 tive enhancement techniques should be study. used for emergency C?ntrols .
• 6.8.2.2 LOGICAL ARRANGEMENT AND LAYOUT a. ORDER AND LABELING -Compo-0 NO 20A03209 II-6 nents should be arranged left-to-right 22A01309 CPT and/or top-to-bottom, and identified in 22A01310 II-7 alphabetic or n1;1meric sequence . *
• 170
• r **
• 3.14 Computer System Survey This section documents the results of the computer system conducted in the main control room at the Surry Power Station. This review was conducted in accordance with tl;le requirements of NUREG-0700, as specified in the Virginia Electric and Power Company CRDR Program Plan. 3.14.1 Objectives

-The objectives of the computer system survey were to: a. Assess the degree to which the computer system in the control room conforms to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

b. Identify and document any features of the computer system that do not conform to the criteria in NUREG-0700.

3.14.2 Scope The scope of the effort extends to the assessment of the computer system in the main control room at the Surry Power Station, using the applicable guidelines as stated in NUREG-0700. The topics evaluated include:

• Software security
• Operator/computer dialogue
• Prompting and structuring
• Keyboards
• Computer function controls
• Other control devices
• Computer response time
• Access aids * *CRT display characteristics
• Symbol and character size
• Operator-display relationships
• Data presentation for mat
• Screen layout and structuring
• Messages
• Graphic coding and highlighting
• Multiple-page considerations
• Printer characteristics
• Alarm messages
• Graph and table requirements.

171

• *
• 3.14.3 Criteria The criteria applied in this survey, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.5.1.6d(2), 6.7.1.la through d, 6.7.1.2a through d, 6.7.L3a through e, 6. 7 .1.4a~ through i, 6. 7 .1.5a through d, 6. 7 .1.6a through d, 6. 7 .1. 7a and b, 6. 7 .1.8a and b, 6.7.2.la through h, 6.7.2.2a through g, 6.7.2.3a through f, 6.7.2.4a through g, 6.7.2.Sa through n, 6.7.2.6a through 1, 6.7.2.7a through m, 6.7.2.Sa through e, 6.7.3.la through f, 6. 7.3.2a through f, 6. 7.3.3a through d. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 3-14. 3.14.4 Method 3.14.4.1 Data Collection

a. b. Data were collected using the checklists contained in the Computer System Task Plan. Data were collected primarily through direct observation of the computer system in the CR and examination of copy printouts of display pages. As necessary, personnel from the Surry computer group were consulted to augment or clarify observations.

Measurements of physical characteristics of the computer system (e.g., key displacement, character size and separation, etc.) were made. System documentation, including operating procedures and hardware specifications, were reviewed, as required . All pertinent observations were recorded on the appropriate data forms. 3.14.4.2. Analysis -Data were analyzed according to the following procedure:

a. All deviations from the criteria were recorded on Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) reports. Recorded information included the items involved, a description of the problem including the NUREG-0700 paragraph number of the criteria, and a recommended solution.

b. The data collection method was also recorded on the HED form. Where data from two or more sources were contradictory, resolution of the conflict was achieved through data review and discussions with cognizant plant personnel.

c. Upon completion of all analyses, the criteria of the computer system task plan were annotated to indicate compliance or noncompliance with the criteria.

3.14.5 Findings The findings of the computer system survey are presented in Table 3:...14, "Computer Survey Findings and HEDs Generated." Overall, 226 criteria were applied to the computer system in the Surry control room. Of these, 87 (39%) were not applicable, 102 (45%) were in compliance, and 37 (16%) were not in compliance. A total of 30 HEDs were generated 172

• *
• which document all of the 37 criteria that were not met. In general, those HEDs address uses of language characteristics, error correction, data entry, computer response Ume, computer procedures, CRT display characteristics, highlighting, printer speed, operation, and alarm messages.

Table 3-14 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings. Note that "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED

• 173 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 1 of 29

• 0~ /// I # ;: G § !I: II ii* ., GUIDELINE " 6.5.1.6 COLOR CODING d. CONSISTENCY OF ME_ANING (2) The meaning of a particular color NIA NIA No color used. should remain the same whether. applied to panel surfaces or pro-jected in signal lights or on CRTs. 6.7.1.1 SOFTWARE SECURITY a. AUTHORIZATION

-The system 0 YES should include positive protection pro-visions to ensure that only properly authorized personnel can make changes (by entry, deletion, or alteration).

b. SECURE STORAGE -At least one 0 YES copy of the current operating software should be stored in a secure remote location.

c. EDITING -When characters, words, or NIA_ NIA

• phrases are to be inserted, such items _should first be collected and displayed on a_ buffer area of the screen, and then collectively inserted by one operator command. d. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

-Before any 0 NO 20A00314 II-7 opera tor requests are processed that would result in permanent changes to* existing data, the computer system should require operator acknowledge-ment. 6.7.1.2 OPERATOR/COMPUTER DIALOGUE a. LANGUAGE CHARACTERISTICS (1) Dialogue should be based on the 0 YES ope~ator's point of view, not the programmer's. (2) Dialogue should be logical. I NO 20000310 11-7 0 2PA00315 II-7 (3) Dialogue should be used in a con-0 YES sistent manner .

• 174 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 2 of 29 * ~&! /1/ I # .. ii t5 ii , # GUIDELINE " 4f 6. 7 .l.2a (Cont'd) (4) Dialogue should reflect the 0 YES vocabulary and syntax of the expected user population.

(5) Input words (e.g., keywords) 0 YES should approximate real words. (6) Dialogue should require an 0 YES explicit command in order to terminate an interaction.

b. ENTRY LENGTH -Individual input 0 YES words which must be typed should not exceed 7 characters.

C, ABBREVIATIONS (1) Abbreviations should be used 0 !YES whenever possible to minimize operator input requirements . * (2) If the operator is using a synonym or abbreviation for a system corn-rnand name, the computer system 0 ~ES should use the same synonym or . abbreviation when referring to that command in messages, prompts, etc., to the operator. (3) The use of abbreviations or con-0 1ES tractions for output text should be avoided. d. ERROR AVOIDANCE -Operator 0 ~o 20A00318 11-7 inputs, responses, or actions which could significantly degrade computer system or plant performance should not be dependent on a single keystroke. 6.7.1.3 PROMWI'ING AND STRUCTURING

a. OPERATOR REQUESTS -The com-0 N'O 20A00315 II-7 puter system should contain prompting and structuring features by which an operator can request additional infer-mation .

• 175 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 3 of 29 * ~$! ~*/ I :r ". i" Ji .!! ' GUIDELINE t:

• I Cl' \ 6. 7.1.3a (Cont'd) b. CORRECTION OF DATA -The com-0 YES puter system should contain prompting and structuring features by which an opera tor can request correct.ed infor-mation when an error is detected.

c. MODE/FILE DISPLAY -The computer 0 YES system should display the mode desig-nation and the file(s) being processed.

d. SPECIFIC ERROR CORRECTION

-0 NO 20A00315

• II-7 The computer system should permit correction of individual errors without requiring re-entry of correctly entered data. I e. ENTRY FILE -The computer system NIA NIA No sequential should contain a sequential file of oper-file. ator entries, available upon operator request.
• 6.7.1.4 DATA ENTRY -KEYBOARDS

a. ALPHANUMERIC KEYBOARD NIA NIA Keyboard is ARRANGEMENT-Keyboards that simple. combine alphabetic and numeric func-tions on a single keyboard should con-form to the standard "QWERTY" arrangement.

See Exhibit 6. 7.-1. b. NUMERIC KEYBOARD ARRANGE-0 YES MENT -The configuration of a key-board used to enter solely numeric data should be a 3x3+1 matrix, either "tele-phone" style or "calculator" style. see Exhibit 6. 7-2. c. USE OF MULTIPLE KEYBOARDS -If 0 YES there is more than one computer sys-tern keyboard in a control room, the alphanum~ric and/or numeric-only key configuration should be the same in all cases. .. d. KEY MEASUREMENTS -To maximize 0 YES* Keys have the effectiveness of keyboards, key barriers. dimensions and separation should be as illustrated (see Exhibit 6. 7-3) .

• 176
• *
• TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 4 of 29 ""'"" 1// /$1 // / / / _______ _.:.;;.:.::::;~---------f

........;;+-+-;........;--1F-...;....t------; 6.7.1.4 (Cont'd) e. KEY DISPLACEMENT AND RESISTANCE -To provide positive key movement feedback to the tor, and to reduce inadvertent tion of keys, (1) Key displacement should be as shown in Exhibit 6. 7-4. (2) Key resistance should be as shown in Exhibit 6. 7-4. f. POSITIVE INDICATION -To provide positive key actuation feedback to the operator, a definite indication should be provided (e.g., snap, feel, audible click, g. h. i. -release of resistance). KEYBOARD SLOPE -Keyboards should have a slope between 150 and 250 from the horizontal (see Exhibit 6. 7-5), VISUAL FEEDBACK -Data being entered via keyboards should be played as it is keyed. RELEVANT* KEYS -The presence of nonrelevant keys, such as those that might be used by programmer nel, adds to keyboard complexity and induces operator errors. Control room keyboards should contain only those keys which are used by operators. 6.7.1.5 COMPUTER FUNCTION CONTROLS a. CONTROL DESIGN -When dedicated controls are used for selection of puter or di.splay functions or modes, the design of the controls should conform to the appropriate guidelines specified in Section 6.4, Controls . 177 0 !YES I NO 20000309 II-7 o NO 20A00316 Il'-7 o NO 20A00317 II-7 0 tiES o ns

• * * ---------------~

TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 5 of 29 g; If C,j !!to~'/ / GUIDELINE I $ I I , __________ .....;;;:;,;,;;,,:,;~---....:..----+-~F--+--.;....+-----f-------;

6. 7 .1.5 (Cont'd) b. c. d

• LABELING AND NOMENCLATURE

-Terms, nomenclature, and abbreviations used on function controls should be the same as or consistent with the terms, nomenclature, and abbreviations of the computer function which is selected or displayed. MASTER CONTROL -When CR Ts are subject to operation by centrally located master controls, a positive indication should be provided: (1) At the master-control location to identify those displays under local or master control. (2) At the individual CRT to indicate whether the display is under master or local control. FUNCTION CONTROLS (1) When dedicated controls are used to initiate/activate functions, the keys should be grouped together. (2) Function controls should be easily distinguished from other types of keys on the computer console. (3) Each function control should be clearly labeled to indicate its function to the operator. (4) If multiple computer consoles exist in the control room, the design and layout of the function controls should be consistent for all consoles . 178 0 !YES N/A ~/A

• N/A ~/A ~IA 'iJ./A 0 [{ES 0 t.rES 0 fES 0 "ES
• *
• TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&.

HEDs GENERATED Page 6 of 29 GUIDELINE I _____________________ ....,.._....,.. __ 'f'-___ -+---+--------"'( 6.7.L5d (Cont'd) (5) When function keys are included with an alphanumeric keyboard, the function keys shou~d be cally separate. (Avoid mode keyboards which utilize the same keys for both alphanumerics and functions by using "shift" keys or mode selection control&.) 6.7.1.6

• OTHER CONTROL DEVICES a. b. c. d. LOCATION -*The control devices should be operable from the location where the operator is most likely to need to interact with the computer .(e.g., keyboard, computer console, play screen). SPEED -The control device should provide rapid positioning of cursors or selection of choices . ACCURACY -Device or method accuracy should be commensurate with the functions to be served. DISPLACEMENT

-Control design should allow the operator freedom of movem*ent to perform other duties. 6.7.1.7 COMPUTER RESPONSE TIME TO OPERATOR QUERIES a. b. MAXIMIZE RESPONSE TIMES -The computer system should provide the _ correct response to each type of query within the recommended response times listed in Exhibit 6. 7-6. RESPONSE DELAY MESSAGES -When response* time for any query exceeds 3 seconds, a delay message should be presented to maintain the operator's attention and to confirm normal puter operation. (See also Guideline 6.7.2.6.) 179 0 YES 0 YES NIAN/A N/A N/A 0 YES I NO 20000301 I-7 I NO 20000301 I-7 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&: HEDs GENERATED Page 7 of 29

• h~~; ~-; 7 If g; gt GUIDELINE " I I '1 " C,i 41 CJ 6. 7.1.8 ACCESS AIDS /3., COMPUTER SYSTEM PROCEDURES (1) A compute set of comP,rlter sys-I NO 20000302 11-7 tern operating procedures and contingency procedures should be available in the control room. (2) Procedures should be prepared D YES from the point of view of the control room operator.

(3) Prooedures should be in hardcopy D YES form as a minimum. (4) Operating procedures should describe:

• (a) The overall computer system. D YES (b) The computer system compo-D YES nents with which the operator
• can interface . (c) The specific procedures neces-D YES sary to accomplish all of the opera tor-computer interface functions.

(5) Contingency procedures should describe: (a) Indications available to the D YES operator which identify failure or malfunctioning of the com-puter system. (b) Necessary actions to be per-I NO 20000302 II-7 formed by the operator if the computer fails or malfunc-tions. '

• 180 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED*

Page 8 of 29 * ~&! I 7 I; If ,I # , I GUIDELINE .". q: 6. 7.1.8 (Cont'd) b. DAT A POINT INDICES (1) The specific codes, or addresses, I NO 20000304* II-7 by which data displays can be called up by an operator should be cross-indexed by: (a) Alphanumeric or numeric code (b) Program name (c) System/subsystem identifica-tion (d) Functional group identifica-tion. (2) Cross-indices should be available I INO 20000304 II-7 in the control room in hardcopy form as a minimum .

• 6.7.2.1 CRT DISPLAY CHARACTERISTICS

a. READABILITY

-Alphanumeric and I INO 20000303 CPT graphic characters should be easily readable by the operator under all con-trol room lighting conditions.

b. REFLECTED GLARE -CRT screens 0 IYES should be installed to minimize or eliminate reflected glare at normal operator viewing angles. c. SCREEN LUMINANCE

-(1) Ambient illumination should con-0 IYES tribute no more than 2596 to screen luminance through diffuse reflection and phosphor excita-tion, (2)

• When ambient illumination in the NIA NIA vicinity of the CRT is in the medium to high range (see Guide-line 6.1.5.3), the CRT should use dark characters and symbols on a
• light background .
• 181 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 9 of 29

• V/'/ I ,, I; I ti I I $I I &UIDELIIIIE 6.7.2.lc (Cont'd) (3) When the CRT uses dark charac-NIA NIA ters on a light background, the screen background luminance should be 23 foot-Lamberts (ft-L) minimum and 46 ft-L preferred (4) When the CRT uses light charac-0 YES ters on a dark background, the character luminance should be 23 ft-L minimum and 46 ft-L prefer-red. d. LUMINANCE CONTRAST (1) Contract between light charac-0 YES ters and a dark screen background should be 15:1 minimum and 20:1 preferred.

(2) Contrast between dark characters NIA NIA and a light screen background

• should be 1:15 minimum and 1:20 preferred.

e. GEOMETRIC DISTORTION

-The 0 YES cumulative effects of all geometric distortion should not displace any point within the viewable area of the screen from its correct position by more than 596 of picture height. f. RESOLUTION -Discrimination of fine detail is a function of the number of scan lines or addressable points ("reso-lution elements") per unit length. (1) CRTs for displaying simple alpha-0 YES numeric text should have a mini-mum of 20 resolution elements per inch. (2) CRTs for displaying complex NIA NIA symbols and graphic detail should have a minimum of 100 resolution elements per inch .

• 182 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 10 of 29
• YJ~! I I f: I I GUIDELINE
• 4' 4li' 6. 7.2.lf (Cont'd) (3) Complex symbols which must be NIA NIA distinguished from other complex shapes should have e. minimum of 10 resolution elements for the longest dimension of the symbol. (4) Alpha.numeric che.re.cters should M YES have e. minimum of 1 O resolution elements per che.re.cter height. g. . REGENERATION RATE -The regen-NIA NIA era tion re. te for a particular CRT dis-play should be above the critical fre-quency at fusion so that the occurrence of disturbing fli~ker is not perceptible.

h. CRT DISPLAY CONTROLS (1) Parameters such as luminance 0 YES (brightness), contrast, and color

• should be adjustable by the con-trol room operator.

(2) Adjustment controls should con-0 YES form to the appropriate guidelines in Section 6.4, Controls, and Section 6.9, Control-Display Inte-gration. 6.7~2.2 SYMBOLS AND CHARACTERS

a. SYMBOL SIZE -When a displayed NIA NIA symbol of complex shape is to be dis-tinguished from another symbol shape that is also complex, the visual angle of the symbol should subtend not less than 20 minutes of arc at the required viewing distance.

b. ALPHANUMERIC CHARACTER SIZE ( 1)

• The height of alphanumeric char-M YES acters should have a visual angle of not less than 12 minutes of arc at the required viewing distance .
• 183
• *
• TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEi>s GENERATED Page 11 of 29 9: If I II $/ ! GUIDELINE

~I/ ~~1/ ---....... ------------------+---+-----+

6. 7 .2.2b {Cont'd) (2) Alphanumeric characters should O YES be uppercase letters. , / c. CHARACTER WIDTH~O-HEIGHT M YES RATIO -The width-to-height ratio for alphanumerics should be between 3:5 and 1:1 .. d. STROKE-WIDTH~O-CHARACTER-HEIGHT M YES RATIO :--Stroke-width-to-character-height ratio should be*between 1:5 and 1:10. e. GRAPIDCS -A graphic line will NIA NIA appear continuous if the separation

f. between addressable points, or resolu-tion elements, is less than one minute of arc. To provide the illusion of conti-nuity, graphic lines should contain a minimum of 50 resolution elements per inch . CHARACTER AND SYMBOL SEP TION (1) Horizontal separation between *. characters or symbols should be between 10% and 65% of acter or symbol height. (2) Separation should be not less than 25% of character or symbol height when any of the following degraded conditions exists: (a) When character or symbol width is less than 85% of height; (b) When character or symbol lµminance is less than 12 ft-L; * (c) When luminance contrast is less than 88%; (d) When CRT screen location is greater than 350 to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead line of sight; 184 M !YES NIA IN/A NIA NIA N/A N/A NIA NIA NIA ~IA* 7

• *
• TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&:

HEDs GENERATED Page 12 of 29 GUIDELINE

6. 7.2.2f(2) (Cont'd) (e) When the visu.al angle tended by symbol height is less than 15 minutes of arc; (f) When the visual angle tended by character height is less than 12 minutes of arc. g. CHARACTER STYLE (FONT) (1) Simple character fonts should be used, with no serifs, variable stroke widths, slanting, etc. (2) When dot-matrix characters are used, 7x9 dot-matrix should be used in preference to 5x7 matrix. (3) Character styles such as Lincoln/ Mitre or Leroy should be used . 6.7.2.3 OPERATOR-DISPLAY SHIPS a. b. VIEWING DISTANCE -Viewing tance should be greater than 18 inches. VIEWING ANGLE -The minimum angle between the operator's actual line-of-sight (LOS) as measured from the operator's normal work station, and the plane of the display screen should be 450 or greater in either the zontal or vertical direction.

See Exhibits 6. 7-8 and 6. 7-1 O. c. SCREEN LOCATION, SEATED OPERATORS (1) CRT displays which require fre-. quent or continuous monitoring, or which may display important (e.g., alarm) information, should be located within the following limits as measured from the nor mal operator work station (see Exhibit 6. 7-9): 185 NO. N/A NO. N/A 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES M YES M YES NIA NIA l

• *
• TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 13 of 29 GUIDELINE llll/$1 II I I I ---------------------+-+--~----+--+--------"'I

6. 7 .2.3c (Cont'd) (2) (a) Horizontal limits -Not more than 350 to the left or right of the opera tor's straight-ahead LOS. " (b) Vertical limits -Not more than 200 above and 400 below the operator's horizontal LOS. CRT displays which do not require frequent or continuous toring, and which will not display important (e.g., alarm) tion, should be located within the following limits (as measured from normal operator work tions which permit full operator head and eye rotation).

See Exhibit 6. 7-1 O): (a) Horizontal limits -Not more than 95° to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits -Not more than 700 above and 900 below the operator's horizontal LOS. d. SCREEN LOCATION, STANDING OPERATORS (1) CRT displays which require quent or continuous monitoring, or which may display important (e.g., alarm) information, should be located within the following limits as measured from the mal operator work station: (a) Horizontal limits -Not more than 350 to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits -Not more than 350 above and 250 below the operator's horizontal LOS . 186 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA ~IA NIA ~IA M !YES M rEs

• * ** TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS c5c HEDs GENERATED Page 14 of 29 __________

o_u,_oe_u_Ne _________ -/J__;;../,_i'J_~_,--_ 1+!. __ °"_~.....;./_G-+~-..;.f_~-j~f-; ____ l_l_" __ --f/ 6.7.2.3d (Cont'd) e. f. (2) CRT displays which do not require frequent or continuous toring, and, which will not display important (e.g., alarm) tion, should be. located within the following limits (as measured from normal operator work tions which permit full operator head and eye rotation): (a) Horizontal limits -Not more than 950 to the left or right of the operator's straight-ahead LOS. (b) Vertical limits -Not more than aso above and 900 below the operator's horizontal LOS. MOUNTING IN CONSOLES -When CR Ts are permanently mounted in soles, the console configuration, sions, and type of use (such as seated,* sit-stand, or standing) affects the CRT/operator interface. Consoles in which CR Ts are installed should con-* form to the guidelines of Section 6.1.2. VISIBILITY OF DATA -All data and messages on the CRT screen should be within the unobstructed view of an operator at the normal work station. 6.7.2.4 DATA PRESENTATION FORMAT a. USABILITY OF DATA (1) Data should be presented to the operator in a readily usable mat. (2)

• There should be no requirement for transposing, computing, polating, or mentally translating displayed data into other units or numerical bases . 187 M YES M YES M YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 15 of 29 * /)~& Ill I # 4t .:: # I I GUIDELINE # 'l' 6. 'l .2.4 (Cont'd) b. ILLUSTRATIONS

-Illustrations should NIA NIA be used whenever possible to supple-ment or explain text. c. CHARACTER GROUPING (1) When 5 or more digits and/or non-0 YES text alphanumerics are displayed, and no natural (i.e., population stereotyped} organization exists, characters should be grouped in blocks of 3 to 4 characters each. \ (2) Groups should be separated by a 0 YES minimum of 1 blank character space. ' d. MAINTENANCE OF ORDERING -0 Y.cS Elements in a data field should be dis-played in logical order (e.g., chrono-logical} .

• e. PRESENTATION OF IDENTICAL DATA (1} The manner of presentation of 0 YES identical data should be based on the uses to which the data will be put by the operator.

(2) Within the limits of (1) above, 0 YES identical data'in different presen-tations should be displayed in a consistent, standardized manner. f. MENU DESIGNATORS (1} Numbers should be used as desig-NIA NIA nators when listing selectable items. (2) Numerical designators should NIA NIA

• start with the number 11 1 11 (not zero} .
• 188 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 16 or 29
• j'~// la I § . I; " I 11 I GUIDELINE " ;: 6. 7 .. 2.4f (Cont'd) (3) If the use of num.bers as designa-NIA NIA tors would create confusion because of other numbers which make up the item to be desig-nated, alphabetic characters should be used. (4) When used, alphabetic designators NIA NIA should start with the letter "A." g. LISTS (1) ~ists should be vertically aligned 0 YES and left-justified.

(2) Indentation should be used for NIA NIA subclassifications.

h. TABLES AND GRAPHS -Quantitative 0 YES da.ta which must be scanned and com-pared should be presented in either

• tabular or graphic form . i. HYPHENATION

-The use of hyphena-0 YES tion should. be minimized.

j. ALIGNMENT (1) When presented in tabular form, 0 YES alphanumeric data should .be left-justified.

(2) When presented in tabular form, 0 NO 20A00319 11-7 numeric data should be right-justified with decimal points aligned. k. PERIODS -Periods should be placed NIA NIA after item selection designators and at the end o{ a sentence .

• 189 l TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 1 'l of 29 * !& I 1 !11 #; # I I # GUIDELINE CJ (! qa 6. 7.2.4 {Cont'd) 1. STANDARDIZED FIELDS -The fol-lowing standardized fields should be used: ! / ' (1)
• Telephone Number: {914)555-1212 NI.A NIA (2) Time: HH:MM:SS, HH:MM, 0 YES MM:SS:(.S)

(3) Date: MM:DD:YY. 0 YES m. DATA GROUP LABELING (1)

• Each individual data group or 0 YES message should have a descriptive title. I (2) Labels should reflect some unique 0 YES characteristic of the content of , the data group or message:
• n. LABEL PLACEMENT

-Labels should 0 YES be located in a consistent manner either above or to the left of the data group or message they describe.

o. LABEL ORIENTATION

-Labels sho.uld 0 YES be oriented horizontally.

p. LABEL IIlGHLIGHTING (1) Labels should be highlighted or 0 NO 20A00320 II-7 otherwise accentuated to facili-tate operator scanning and recog-nition. (2) The technique used to highlight 0 NO 20A00320 II-7 labels should be easily distin-guished from that used to high-ligh~ emergency or critical mes-sages. 'q, OPTION LABELS -When presenting a NIA NIA list of operator options, the label should reflect the question or choices being *, posed to the operator.*

• 190 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 18 of 29
• Y.// /// I I '" $ ii I I GUIDELINE " .. 6.7.2.5 SCREEN LAYOUT AND STRUCTURING

a. ORGANIZATION OF DATA (1) Displayed data should be organ-o. YES ized in a logical, consistent man-ner. (2) Displayec.1 data should reflect 0 YES some obvious and inherent quality of the data groups (e.g., hier-archical, sequential, or mimic relationships).

b. LOCATION OF DATA GROUPS-0 YES Physical location of specific data groups (e.g., alarms, menus) on *the screen should be consistent.

c. DEMARCATION OF DATA 0 YES SUBGROUPS

-Organization and sepa-* ration of information subgroups should be made apparent to the operator through the use of blank spaces, lines, or some other form of visible demarca-tion. d. USE FREQUENCY RANKING -Lists NIA NIA. of options should be organized according to the probability of selec-tion for each item, with high proba-bility items presented first. e. ALPHANUMERIC RANKING -Non-NIA NIA option lists of equal-probability options should be presented in alphabetical or numerical order. f. SEPARATION OF PARAGRAPHS -NIA NIA Paragraphs in continuous text should be separated. by at least one blank line. g. SELECTION DESIGNATORS -Selec-NIA NIA tion designators 1n menus should be separated from text descriptors by at least one blank space. *,

• 191

---

l TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 19 or 29

• i// /// I ,? -$ I! If 'JI, , I GUIDELINE ;:, --6. 7 .2.5 (Cont'd) h. PAGE DESIGNATION

-When data are NIA NIA contained on multiple pages, each page should display both page nurpber and total number of pages. i. CONTINUOUS NUMBERING -Items NIA NIA contained in a numbered list and described on 11 continue 11 pages should be numbered relative to the first number on the first page of the list. j. PLACEMENT OF INSTRUCTIONS -NIA NIA When directions to the operator accom-pany a list of options, such directions should precede presentation of the list. k. URGENT MESSAGES (1) Urgent messages requiring imme-0 NO 20A00320 II-7 diate operator response should be I 20000311 II-7

• highlighted to attract the opera-tor's attention.

(2) Urgent messages should always be I NO 20000311 II-7 displayed in the same location.

1. USE OF CURSOR -In systems in NIA NIA which selection is made by use of a cursor, formats should be organized to minimize positioning movements of tl'le cursor. m. SCREEN -LOADING -The amount of 0 YES information-bearing activated screen area should not exceed 25% of the total screen area. This does not include demarcation lines used to separate groups of data. -,

• 192 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 20 of 29
• y:// ~; 7 # § ;::: /1 , t! I I 8 GUIDELINE ._, . Ci' 6. 7 .2.5 (Cont'd) n. TREND PLOT SCALES -CRT dis-Nil NIA played trend plot scales should be con-sistent with the intended functional use of the data. (For example, the moni-toring of neutron flux at reactor trip may have a variable scale of 096 to 196 of the design value and a time scale ' resolution of seconds. However, post-trip monitoring may have a variable scale of 096 to 1096 with a time scale resolution of minutes. Finally, opera-tional log data of neutron flux may have a time scale resolution of hours.) 6.7.2.6 MESSAGES a. MESSAGES, GENERAL (1) Messages should be concise. NIA NIA * (2) Messages should provide the oper-NIA NIA ator with the information neces-:-sary to complete a specific action or decision sequence.

b. MESSAGE CONTENT -Information NIA NIA contained in messages should be neces-sary, complete, and readily usable. c. USE OF PROMPTS -Prompts should NI) NIA be displayed whenever the operator may need directions or guidance to initiate or complete an action or sequence of actions. d. _ CONTENT OF PROMPTS -Prompts NIA NIA should contain clear and specific cues and instructions which are relevant to the action to be taken. e. PROMPT INFORMATION NIA NIA SEQUENCE -Directions should be placed in the sequence to be used by the operator.

• ,
• 193 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&.

HEDs GENERATED Page 21 of 29

• Y./ Ill 7 E, # G :;$ ,f: I( GUIDELINE II I 41 6. 7 .2.6 (Cont'd) f. USE OF ERROR MESSAGES -When-0 YES ever an operator error or invalid input is detected, an error message should be displayed.

g. ERROR CORRECTION GUIDANCE -0 YES Error messages should contain instruc-tions to the operator regarding l'equired corrective action. h. ERROR CORRECTION EASE -Capa-0 YES bility should be provided for operator correction of individual errors without affecting adjacent valid entries. i. SYSTEM STATUS FEEDBACK 0 !YES MESSAGES -Feedback messages should be provided to the operator to indicate changes in the status of system functioning.

• j. SELECTION FEEDBACK -When a NIA IN/A displayed message or datum is selected as an option or input to the system, the subject item should be highlighted, or otherwise positively identified, to indi-cate acknowledgement by the system. k. DELAY FEEDBACK -When system 0 INO 20A00321 Il-:7 functioning requires the operator to stand by, such as when the computer is searching for requested data, periodic feedback should be provided to the operator to indicate normal system operation and. the reason for the delay. 1. ACTMTY COMPLETION 0 ~o 20A00321 II-7 FEEDBACK -When a process or sequence is completed by the system, positive in.dication should be presented to the opera tor concerning the outcome of th~ process and requirements for subsequent operator actions .
• 194
• *
• TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS&.

HEDs GENERATED Page 22 of 29 GUIDELINE 6.7.2.7 GRAPHIC CODING AND LIGHTING a. USE OF HIGHLIGHTING -Highlighting should be used to attract the operator's attention to any displayed data item or message which is important to decision-making or action requirements.

b. CONSISTENT APPROACH (1) Highlighting methods which have information value beyond their attention-getting quality should have the same meaning in all applications.

(2) Highlighting methods associated with emergency conditions should not also be used in association with normal conditions.

c. CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT

-When contrast enhancement (i.e., increased illumination intensity level) is used for highlighting, not more than two (prefer-able) or three (maximum) brightness levels should be used in a single presen-tation. d. FLICKER OR BLINKING -Blinking of a symbol or message (e.g., ON-OFF or alternating high-low brightness) for purposes of highlighting should be reserved for emergency conditions or similar situations requiring immediate operator action. e. BLINK RATES (1) When blinking is used for high-lighting, a maximum of 2 blink rates should be used. (2) When a single blank rate is used, the rate should approximate 2 to 3 11 blinks 11 per second with a mini-mum of 50 msec 11 on 11 time betwe-en blinks . 195 0 NO 20A00320 II-7 NIA NIA NIA NIA . NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NiA NIA NIA *,

• *
• TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 23 of 29 GUIDELINE I -----------------------+--t---+------f---t--------;

6. 7 .2. 7e (Cont'd) f. g. h. i. (3) When 2 blink rates are used, the fast blink should approximate 4 per second and the slo~ blink should approximate 1 per second. (4) When 2 blink rates are used, the "on-off" ratio should approximate 5096. (5) When 2 blink rates are used, the higher rate should apply to the most critical information.

INVERSE VIDEO -Image reversal (e.g., dark characters on a light ground) should be used primarily for highlighting in dense data fields, such as a word or phrase in a paragraph of text, or a set of characters in a table of data . USE OF GRAPIDC CODING -Graphic coding methods (e.g., symbols, boxes, underlines, colors) should be used to present standard qualitative mation to the operator or to draw the operator's attention to a particular portion of the display. GRAPIDC CODE CONSISTENCY -Grapl')ic codes, used separately or in combination, should have the same meaning in all applications. GEOMETRIC SHAPE CODING -When geometric shape (symbol) coding is used, the basic symbols should vary . widely in shape. j. NUMBER OF SYMBOLS (1)

• The number of basic symbols used for coding should be kept small. (2) The upper limit under. optimum display conditions should be 20 . 196 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIAN/A NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA
• *
• TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 24 o! 29 __________

s_u,_oE_u_Ne _________ ,...ll __ l,_0_~_1...__l-+~; __ ~_~_/_G--+~--$_1'_~,..; ____ ~_l_~ __ --f/ 6. 7.2. 7j (Cont'd) (3) The upper limit under adverse display conditions should be 6. (4) When needed, other highlighting and graphic techniques (color, filled versus unfilled, and other "modifiers") should be used to display different states or ties of a basic symbol. k. USE OF COLOR -(Exhibit 6. 7-11) 1. (1) Colors used on the CRT to convey information should be consistent in use and meaning with all other color codes in the control room. (2) Once colors are assigned a cific use or meaning, no other color should be used for the same purpose . COLOR MEANINGS -When color is used, the meaning of the colors should, where applicable, equate with the monly understood meaning of those colors. The following specific meanings for selected colors should apply when these colors are used in CRT displays: (1) Red -Unsafe condition, danger, immediate operator action required, or critical parameter value out of tolerance. _(2) Green -Safe condition, no ator action required, or meter value is within tolerance. (3) YellpwlAmber -Hazard, tially unsafe, caution, attention

• required; marginal parameter value exists . 197 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 25 of 29
• v.// /// I I lP i::, ,;, G # GUIDELINE tf I I it .. 4 .. 6. 7 .2. 7 (Cont'd) m. RED-GREEN COMBINATIONS (1) Whenever possible, rec;1' and green NO NIA colors should not be used in com-bination.

(2) Use of red symbols/characters on NO NIA a green background should espe-cially be avoided. 6.7.2.8 MULTIPLE-PAGE CONSIDERA-TIONS a. OPERATOR MEMORY . (1) Page design and content planning NIA NIA should minimize requirements for operator memory. (2) All data relevant to a specific NIA NIA

• operator entry should be displayed on a single page. b. AUDIT TRAIL -When pages are NIA NIA organized in a hierarchical fashion, containing a number of different paths through the series, a visual audit trail of the choices should be available upon operator request. c. LOCATION REFERENCES (1) When the operator is required to NIA NIA scroll or pan on a large logical frame, location references should be provided in the viewable por-tion of the frame. (For example, when scrolling a list, any part of which is visible at any one time, the present and maximum loca-tion should be shown.) (2) Sectional coordinates should be NIA NIA used when large schematics must be panned or magnified .
• 198 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 26 of 29
• Is I I I G § i5 *
• G G {I GUIDELINE

$ II ~I ... I -t' 4i' l! " 6. 7 .2.8 (Cont'd) d. OPERATOR CONTROL -The opera-NIA NIA tor should have some capability for controlling the amount, format, and complexity of information (e.g., core dumps, program outputs, error mes-sages) being displayed by the system. e. LOCATION CONSISTENCY-If the NIA NIA message is a variable option list, com-mon elements should maintain their physical relationship to other recurring elements. 6.7.3.1 PRINTER CHARACTERISTICS

a. PRINTER APPLICATIONS (1) Printers should be part of the 0 YES process computer system and be located in the primary operating

• area . (2) Control room printers should 0 YES provide the capability to record alarm data, trend data, and plant status data. b. DISPLAY COPIES (1) The system should, if possible, be 0 YES designed to provide hardcopy of any page appearing on the CRT at the request of the operator.

(2) If the copy will be printed remote 0 YES to the operator, a print confirma-_tion or denial message should be displayed. (3) Pri~ter operation should not alter 0 YES screen content. c. FORM OF PRINTED INFORMATION -0 YES Printed information should be presented in a directly usable form with minimal **, requirements for decoding, transposing, and interpolating .

• 199 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 27 of 29
• 1/I la I I ,l' ,t; ,7! # I ,;:, I GUIDELINE " " " 6. 7 .3.1 {Cont'd) d. PRINTER SPEED -Pr.inters used for I ~o 20000305 11-7 recording trend data, computer alarms, 0 20A00322 11-7 and critical status information should have a high-speed printing capability of at least 300 lines a minute to permit printer output to keep up with com-puter output. e. PRINTER OPERATION

-Paper, rib-bons, and ink (if used) should be con-sistent with the following: (1) Hard-finish matte paper should be I ~o 20000308 III-9 used to avoid smudged copy and glare. (2) There should be a positive indica-0 rtES tion of the remaining supply of recording materials.

• (3) Instructions for reloading paper, I N'O 20000306 II-7 ribbon, ink, etc., should appear on 0 20A00323 II-7 an instruction plate attached to the printer. (4) When the printer is down during I N'O 20000305 II-7 reloading, data and information which would normally be printed must not be lost. (5) A takeup device for printed mate-I rn 20000307 II-7 rials should be provided which 0 20A00324 II-7 requires little or no opera tor attention and which has a capac-ity at lease equal to the feed supply . f. . PRINT COPY ACCESSIBILITY

-The following features should be provid~d to enhance operator accessibility of printed material: (1) Provisions should be made so that 0 ~o 20A00325 II-7 the operator can always read the most recently printed line. , .

• 200 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS & HEDs GENERATED Page 28 of 29 * /;~&! I I I '" I ii ;if # GUIDELINE
• " I $ I I , 6.7.3.lf (Cont'd) (2) Printed material should have an 0 NO 20A00326 II-7 adequate contrast ratio to ensure . . -easy operator reading. (3) It should be possible to annotate 0 YES the print copy while it is still in the machine. (4) The recorded matter should not 0 NO 20A00325 n-7 be obscured, masked, or otherwise hidden in a manner which pre-vents direct reading of. the mate-rial. 6.7.3.2 ALARM MESSAGES a. ALARM RECORDS (1) A printer should be provided for 0 YES recording alarm. messages . * (2) All annunciator alarms should be 0 YES recorded.

b. ALARM SEQUENCE -Alarm mes-0 YES sages should be recorded in the ,sequence of their occurrence.

C, OPERATOR-REQUESTED 0 NO 20A00327 II-7 PRINTOUT -Provisions should be included to provide, upon operator request, printouts by alarm group (e.g., system, subsystem, component).

d. ALARM IDENTIFICATION

-Alarm I NO 20000312 II-6 -messages spould be readily distinguish-0 20A00328 II-7 able from other messages.

e. ALARM DISCRIMINATION

-Alarm .. 0 YES messages.should provide rapid identifi-cation of the nature of the alarm. f. CONSISTENT TERMINOLOGY -Wording in alarm messages should: *, (1) Clearly relate to the specific I NO 20000313 ll-7 annunciator tile that is illumi-nated .

• 201 TABLE 3-14 COMPUTER SURVEY FINDINGS c5c HEDs GENERATED Page 29 of 29
• 0~! la I I # ti !::j ;s 4! g; 9l 4! GUIDELINE

&: II ~I " " -lt"4l CJ 6. 'l .3.2f (Cont'd) (2) Contain at least that information I NO 20000313 II-'l (i.e., wording) presented in the illuminated annunciatof tile. (3) Provide additional specific data. 0 YES . . 6.'l.3.3 GRAPH AND TABLE REQUIRE-MENTS a. SHAPE OF FUNCTION -If the gen-0 YES eral shape of the function is important in making decisions, a graph should be used. b. INTERPOLATION -If interpolation is N/A NIA necessary, line graphs are preferable to bar graphs and tables. c. GRIDS * (1) Graphs should be constructed so 0 YES that numbered grids are bolder than unnumbered grids. (2) If 10-grid intervals are used, the 0 YES fifth intermediate grid should be less bold than the numbered grid, but bolder than the unnumbered grids. d. TABLES (1) Tables should be simple, concise, 0 YES and readable. (2) When table columns are long, 0 NO 20A00329 II-7 numbers should be separated into groups by providing a space between groups of five. (3) When columns are not separated 0 NO 20A00330 II-7

• by vertical lines, the columns should be separated by at least 2 character widths .
• 202
• *
• 4.0 SYSTEM FUNCTIONS REVIEW AND TASK ANALYSIS AND VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION

4.1 System

Functions Review and Task Analysis The objectiyes of the system functions review and task analysis were: a. To develop a plant-specific task analysis data base from generic task analytic background information and generic emergency response lines. b. To identify operator action and information requirements from the plant-specific task analysis for those tasks performed under emergency conditions which provide emergency response capabilities.

c. Prepare for task verification and validation which would assess the suitability of the control room design in supporting task performance.

4.1.2 Approach

To accomplish the above objectives, Revision 1 of the Westinghouse Owners' Group Emergency Response Guidelines (WOG-ERGs) and the four-volume set of background documents were used. In accordance with the NRC-WOG meeting of 29 March 1984, the WOG-ERGs, Revision 1, are considered a validated data base which defines the generic plant systems and functions (including the primary action/information requirements) and allocates the functions between the human and the machine. The system function review and task analysis was performed in two major steps. First, generic data were developed based on the ERGs and background documents (Rev 1). Second, the data was made plant-specific by reviewing the ERGs with operations personnel to determine the action and information requirements for operators to perform each step. Plant setpoint documents, Emergency Response Tracking documents and step

• sequence -tracking documents developed by Virginia Electric and Power Company's Nuclear Operations Department (NOD) to track each ERG step to its associated procedure step were also used to develop the plant-specific action and information requirements.

During verification, the actual Surry Power Station instruments and controls that were used to perform these functions were identified. If the control and/or instrument did not conform to the requirements of the task analysis, a Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) Report was prepared

• 203
• * * ---------~-----------------

4.1.2.1 Procedure The task analysis procedure developed by Essex Corporation extracted generic operator action and information requirements from the Westinghouse Owners' Group Emergency Response Guidelines and Background documents, converted the requirements to a plant-specific level and documented the results for use in the verification process. The following paragraphs briefly describe the procedural details. 4.1.2.2 Action-Information Requirements Details (AIRD} AIRD forms (see Figure 4-1) were prepared by Essex Corporation for each step, caution sta,tement, and note in Revision 1 of the Emergency Response Guidelines (ERGs) and all the Function Restoration Guidelines. Essex staff identified all behavioral elements for each task and listed each element in the AIRD Behavior Element Table. A behavioral element is defined by the various behavioral and physical properties of an action requirement or an information requirement. Review of the AIRD forms was conducted by Surry Power Station operations personnel to modify instrument and control requirements as necessary. Plant-specific setpoints were added, and the generic task analysis was made plant-specific . 4.1.2.3 Action-Information Requirements Summary (AIRS} All behavioral elements of a given type, independent of the ERG, ERG step or task

• in which they appear w.ere collected on the AIRS forms (see Figure 4-2). Then, based on the information entered onto the AIRS form, the action or information requirements for the given behavioral element were entered in the summary of requirements block on each AIRS form. This for med the basis for an instrument and control specification~

In-service inspection valve response times were also listed in the requirements summary block for valves which are safety related by function. This was done to identify infrequently operated safety-related valves that have an actual stroke time significantly different from operator expectations. Identifying these valves will alert the operator of unusual response times and therefore avoid the potential for confusion

• 204 --~ ~----------------

---*---------~---

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAIL (AIRD) PLANT: _________

__..;. ___ _ UNIT: ____ _ ORIGINATOR: _____ _ ERG NO: _________ _ REVIEWER: _____ _ STEP NO: _________ _ STEP OBJECTIVE:------------------- REMARKS: l,j Component/ / J Equipment No. BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS I I I I ~fl ... 7 C ~J:t ;! ll Ii! . Parameter

• Direction j :::,f 4./ ,.._!J FIGURE 4-1 SAMPLE AIRD FORM
• Sheet ___ ot ----DATE: DATE: --------Command
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS

SUMMARY

(AIRS) PLANT:-------------

UNIT: __ _ REVIEWER:

---

.

• Sheet __ of ---DATE: ______ _ DATE: ______ _ SORT BLOCK

SUMMARY

OF REQUIREMENTS BLOCK VERIFICATION

SUMMARY

BLOCK REOS TYPE: Act ____ Info __ _ SYSTEM: _________ ___ COMPONENT: ________ _ PARAMETER: UNITS: ----------- PRECISION: ________ _ RESPONSE TIME: INDIVIDUAL DETAILS ~-kl/ ti* ii 1 Verb / ... I****~ Direction Range l***w Rate l11/ !! FIGURE 4*2 SAMPLE AIRS FORM DEVICE PASS FAIL I.D. No PANEL I Comments

• *
• 4.2 Verification of Component Availability and Suitability The objectives of this effort were to identify availability (presence) and suitability of required instrumentation and controls in the control room to support performance of system functions.

The basic criteria were: (1) the control and display designs should match the task needs and operator capabilities, (2) frequently required or important instrumentation or controls should be located in the control room, and (3) infrequently used or unimportant controls and instrumeritation should be excluded from the primary panel locations in the control room. During the weeks of April 1 and April 22, 1985, verification of equipment availability was performed by one human factors specialist, one Surry Operations Coordinator with SRO license, and an ex-SRO with four years of experience in human factors. This analysis was accomplished by comparing the action and information requirements on the AIRS forms to the control room inventory as shown on a half-scale, color photomosaic of the Surry Power Station control room. During the verification exercises, the following component availability and ability questions were asked of the operators:

• Is all the information you require present in the control to perform the task(s)?
• Are all needed controls provided to perform the task(s)?
• Do the controls and displays provide the appropriate range of information/

control?

• Are the controls and displays adequate in terms of precision and response time? All findings discrepant from NUREG-0700 guidelines were documented in the form of HED reports. 4.2.1 Verify Human Engineering Suitability The objective of this effort was to identify man-machine interface problems that may affect task performance, but that may not be evident in component surveys. There are five major design issues: (1) component suitability, i.e., whether each required component provides the appropriate range, precision, scale units, and response time; (2) the grouping of components with respect to function, sequence, importance, and frequency-of-use criteria; (3) control and display integration to ensure that associated 207 i * *
• controls and displays are not dispersed and that their designs are compatible; (4) nent discrimination through enhancements such as demarcation and coding techniques; and (5) panel l_ayouts for consistency of conventions across all panels/units.

Verification of human engineering suitabiHty was performed (1) during the tion of component availability and suitability effort using* the photomosaic at the Essex facility, and (2) during walk-through/talk-throughs of event sequences at the Surry simulator by Surry Power Station op'erators and Essex human factors specialists during the week of September 24, 1984. The activities involved in verification of component suitability efforts using the photomosaic w~re described in Section 4.2. The objectives of the throughs were twofold: first, to verify the completeness of the task analysis and, second, to review the human engineering suitability of the control room design. During the walk-through, all tasks analyzed were observed and reviewed in terms of human engineering suitability. Over the course of one week, one shift supervisor, two control room operators, one shift technical advisor, two human factors specialists and one simulator instructor walked and talked through each of the operator-allocated and -analyzed tasks at the Surry simulator. At_ the end of each task or group of related tasks, the participating operators were asked the following questions pertinent to task ance: o Does the CR design adequately support task performance? o Does equipment layout adequately support task performance? o Does equipment design adequately support task performance? o Do you know of any errors which have occurred during performance of this (these) tasks? In cases where* suitability issues were identified, the issues were discussed and subsequently documented in the form of HEDs. 4.2.2 Verification of Task Performance Capabilities Criteria The criteria applied to this process, ~dentified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.1.la and b, 6.1.3.ld and e, 6.3.4.3a and b, 6.5.1.la through f, 6.5.1.2a through f, 6.5.1.5d through f, 6.9.12c, 6.9.3.2a through d. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 4-2

• 208
• *
• 4.2.3 Task Analysis/Verification Findings The findings of the Task Analysis/Verification effort are presented in Table 4-2 "Verification of Task Performance Capabilities." Overall, 34 criteria were applied to the verification process. Of these, 2 {6%) were not applicable, 5 (15%) were in compliance, and 27 (79%) were not in compliance.

A total of 154 HEDs were generated which document all of the 27 criteria that were not met. Table 4-2 also includes the category assigned to each HED during assessment meetings (see Section 5.0 for an explanation of assessment category). Note that the category "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED . 209 TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILmES Page 1 of 6

• 0'/ /// I i .. ,I I 1 $~' I # &UIDELINE , 6.1.1.l ACCESSIBILITY OF INSTRUMENTATION/EQUIPMENT

a. PRESENT IN THE CONTROL ROOM -0 NO 22A05001 1-1 Control room instrumentation and equip-20A02035 II-6 ment should include all controls and displays 20A02050 II-6 needed for (1) detection of abnormal condi-20A02051 II-6 tions, and (2) bringing the plant to a safe 20A03061 IIl-8 shutdown condition.

20A03062 III-7 22A01703 CPT ' 20A03063 III-9 21A01702 CPT 22A02053 CPT 21A01701 CPT 22A03065 CPT 22A02054 CPT 22A03066 CPT 22A05002 1-2 21A05009 CPT 20A02005 II-6 23001105 II-6 20A02043 I-5 20A02044 1-4

• 20A02045 1-1 20A02046 1-2 20A02049 1-3 b. ARRANGED TO FACILITATE 0 NO 20001203 IIl-8 COVERAGE -Opera tors should not have 22A00403 CPT leeway to leave the primary operating area (see Exhibit 6.1-1) to attend control room instrumentation on back panels during oper-ational sequences in which continuous moni-toring or the timing of control actions may be criticaL 6.1.3.1 UNIT INTEGRATION AND INTERFER-ENCE 0 NO 20A04203 III-9 d. SHARING OF PROCEDURES

-Each unit 23000402. IIl-8 should have its own set of procedures and other reference documents as required to make sure that references are easily availa-ble to personnel in each unit, and to avoid conflicting needs for the same reference.

e. SHARING OF EQUIPMENT

-(1) Control of plant equipment from one 0 NO 22A01009 CPT control room should not affect the 20A01007 CPT ability of operators of other control 22A01000 CPT rooms to maintain control of their 22A01008 CPT

• respective units . 210 TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILmES Page 2 of 6
• 1///,1/1/ I # GUIDELINE 6.1.3.le (Cont'd) (2) The status of plant equipment under 0 NO 20A01007 CPT the control of one control room should be displayed in all cQntrol rooms caps.-ble of controlling that equipment.

(3) If control of plant equipment from one NIA N/A Dual Unit CR control room renders that equipment unavailable to other control rooms, availability status indications should be displayed in all control rooms. (4) A single, ce.ntrally located control 0 YES panel/console may be used for dual-unit control rooms within the same isolation boundary when this design does not conflict with the panel layout and control-display integration guide-lines of Sections 6.8 and 6.9 (5) Administrative procedures should be in 0 NO 20A01007 CPT place which assign responsibility for 22A04002 Il-6

• allocation of use of controls of shared plant equipment to single control room. 6.3.4.3 ANNUNCIATOR RESPONSE PROCE-DURES a. AVAILABILITY

-Annunciator response 0 YES procedures should be available in the control room. b. INDEXING -Annunciator response proce-0 YES dures should be indexed by panel identifica-tion and annunciator tile coordinates. 6.5.1.1 INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED

a. TASK ANALYSIS -Analysis of operator 0 YES Conducted as part tasks in relation to system engineering and of CRDR system functional objectives is recom-mended as the surest means of establishing opera tor information requirements .

• 211 TABLE4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES Page 3 of 6
• lll/,1/ll

$ IIU1DEL1f11E ,. b. COMPLETENF.SS OF INFORMATION -0 NO 22A02027 II-6 Visual displays provided in the control room 23001208 1-5 should give operators all the information 23003018 1-5 about system status and parameter values 20A02035 II-6 that is needed to meet task requirements in 20A02050 Il-6 normal, abnormal, and emergency situa-20A02051 Il-6 tions. 20A02052 11-6 23A02413 1-2 20A02005 11-6 ' 20002237 III-8 23001105 Il-6 20A02043 1-5 20A02044 1-4 20A02045 1-1 20A02046 1-2 20A02049 I-3 20002238 IIl-8 20002239 III-8 20002240 IIl-8 c. UNNEC~ARY INFORMATION -Effi-0 NO 20001103 IIl-9 cient performance requires not only display 20A01148 II-6 of all needed information but also avoiding 23003018 1-5 the display of extraneous information in the 23A02055 CPT

• prime operating area . 22A01213 III-9 d. REDUNDANCY

-Redundancy in the pre-0 NO 20001103 Ill-9 sentation of information items should be 22A02028 CPT limited to cases where needed for backup or to avoid excessive operator movement.

e. DEMAND INFORMATION VERSUS STATUS 0 NO 20A02035 Il-6 INFORMATION

-Demand information 20A02050 Il-6 shows that equipment has been commanded 20A02051 Il-6 (by control settings or otherwise) to a par-20A02005 Il-6 ticular state or leveL It shows only what is 20A02043 I-5 demanded -not what is actually being 20A02044 1-4 realized. Status information shows the 20A02045 1-1 state or level actually in effect. 20A02046 1-2 20A02049 1-3 (1) To prevent operator confusion, it is 0 NO 20001104 11-5 essential that displays be identified as 20001106 11-6 to whether they reflect demand or 20001107 1-2 actual status. 22A02029 Il-5 (2) Visual display of actual 0 NO 22A03041 11-5 system/equipment status should be 22A03101 Il-6 displayed for all important* 20A03061 IIl-8 parameters. 20A03062 Ill-7 20A03063 IIl-9

• 212 TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIF..S Page 4 of 6
• la I I I I $ I I $/ I I IIUIDELIIIE 6.5.1.1 (Cont'd) f. DISPLAY FAIL URE -'When panel instru-0 NO 22A02030 CPT ments, such as meters, fail or become 22A02056 CPT inoperative, the failure should be apparent 22A02057 CPT to the operator (e.g., through off-scale indi-22A02058 II-:6 cation). 20A02203 CPT 6.5.1.2 USABILITY OF DISPLAYED V ALOES a. SCALE SELECTION

-Scale units should be 0 NO 21A02412 1-2 consistent with the degree of precision and 22A02076 CPT accuracy needed by the operator. 22A02032 II-7 20A02037 CPT 20002018 Il-5 20002019 Ill-9 . 22A02060 Il-6 22A02074 Il-5 22A02075 Il-2 .. 22A02070 1-2 22A02071 CPT 22A02068 CPT

• 22A02069 CPT
• 22A02066 (::PT 22A02067 Ill-7 22A02072 Il-5 22A02073 Il-6 22A02062 Ill-9. 22A02063 CPT 22A02064 1-2 22A02065 1-5 22A02031 Ill-8 22A02061 CPT 20A02231 III-8 20A02235 Ill-8 22A02059 1-3 20A02230 Il-5 20002006 CPT 20002007 III-9 20002008 CPT b. ELIMINATION OF OPERATOR 0 NO 22A02077 CPT CONVERSION

-All displays should indi-cate values in a form immediately usable by the operator without requiring mental con-version. ' c. PERCENTAGE INDICATION -Percentage 0 NO 20002007 Il-7 indication may be used when the parameter 20002000 11-7 is meaningfully reflected by percentage. 20002018 Il-5 20002019 III-9 22A02033 CPT

• 213 TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES Page s*of 6
• y;~; I -~ is ; I # I $I I &UIDELINE " 6.5.1.2 (Cont'd) d. SCALE RANGE -Scales should be selected 0 NO 20A02233 Il-6 to: (1) I Span the expected range ot 0 NO 20AD2232 CPT operational parameters, or 20A02236 Il-6 22A02079 Il-7 20A02241 Il-6 20002006 CPT 22A02078 lli-7 (2) Employ appropriate scale ranging techniques, or (3) Be supported by auxiliary wide-range 0 NO 22AD2034 CPT instruments.

22A02081 CPT 22A02080 Il-7 22A02082 1-2 e. SCALE SIZE -Scale ranges may be 0 NO 20002010 Il-6 expanded (or contracted) by multiplying or 20002021 Il-7 dividing indicated scale values by powers of

• ten. All such scales should be clearly marked as to whether the indicated values should be multiplied or divided, and the factor involved (e.g., 10, 100, 1000). f. SENSITIVITY

-Display dynamic sensitivity 0 NO 20002009 1-5 should be selected to minimize the display 20002020 IlI-9 of normal random variations in equipment 22AD0111 CPT performance. 22A05006 I-6 6.5.1.5 SCALE MARKING d. SCALE COMPATIBILITY -When two or 0 NO 20002011 Il-6 more displays of the same parameter (e.g., 20002237 IlI-8 pressure, temperature) must be compared, 20002038 III-8 scales should be compatible in numerical 20002039 IlI-8 progression and scale organization. (See 20002040 Ill-8 Exhibit 6. 5-6). e. LINEAR VS LOGARITHMIC SCALES -0 NO 20002012 Il-6 Logarithmic scales should be avoided unless needed to display a range of values. f. MULTISCALE INDICATORS -Multiscale 0 YES indicators (i.e., single pointer, multiple scales) should be avoided unless they can be justified as of operational benefit, and pre-cautions are taken to avoid operator con-fusion .

• 214 TABLE 4-2 VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES Page 6 of 6
• V/! i/1 I ;, I § $/ I # IIUIDELINE , 6.9.1.2 MULTIPLE CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS *c. (4) Displays should read off-scale, not N/ I\ N/A zero, when not selected, especially if zero is a possible parameter displayed (see Exhibit 6.9-2). 6.9.3.2 CONTROL-DISPLAY RATIO a. CONTROLS -Controls should provide a 0 NO 20A03030 D-7 capability to affect the parameter con-20003015 1-5 trolled easily, with the required level of 20A03055 lll-9 precision.

They should be effective in 20A03056 Il-5 sufficient time, under expected dynamic. 20A03057 D-7 conditions, and within the limits of manual dexterity, coordination, and reaction time. b. DISPLAYS -Displays should provide a 0 NO 20003015 1-5 capability to distinguish significant levels-of the system parameter controlled. I c. EXCESS PRECISION -Both displays and 0 NO 20A03055 DI-9 controls should have a precision which does 20A03056 D-5

• not greatly exceed that required . 20A03057 D-7 20A03030 D-7 d. FE_EDBACK

-Feedback from the display 0 NO 20A03042 1-2

• should be apparent for any deliberate movementofacontroL
• 215
• *
• 4.3 Validation of Control Room Functions Whereas the control room surveys evaluated control room equipment largely on a component basis, the objective of the validation process was to examirie the organization of the components and the extent to which they function as an integrated whole to support control room operations.

The . method employed for the validation process was a real-time simulation of selected scenarios at the Surry simulator that challenged all of the critical safety functions. A step-by-step walk-through took place immediately after each real-time simulation. The scenarios are described in Appendix C. This method facilitated observation of any conditions or features of the control room which hamper or impede the successful performance of a task. The validation walk-throughs were manned by Surry Power Station operating

• personnel.

They included a shift supervisor, two control room operators, a shift technical advisor and a simulator instructor. Before the walk-throughs were conducted, a briefing was given which included an explanation of the purpose of the walk-throughs and examples of potential human factors problems. The observer team consisted of two human factors specialists. During the validation process, a walk-through validation form was used, _with HF observers concentrating on appropriateness of control room layout, component location, and workload (see Figures 4-3A, 4-3B). In addition, questions were asked concerning workload, excessive task complexity, and time constraints in task performance.. In all cases where issues were identified, the issue was discussed in detail and subsequently documented in the form of HEDs. ( 4.3.1 Validation of Control Room Functions Criteria The criteria applied to this validation, identified by NUREG-0700 paragraph number, are: paragraphs 6.1.1.2a and b, 6.1.3.la through c, 6.1.3.2a and b, 6.4.2.2f(2), 6.4.3.la, 6.8.1.la through c, 6.8.1.2, 6.8.1.3a and b, 6.8.2.la through c, 6.8.2.2b, 6.8.2.3a and b, 6.8.2.4a and b, 6.8.3.2a through c, 6.8.3.3, 6.9.1.la through c, 6.9.1.2a through c, 6.9.2.la and b, 6.9.2.2a through e, 6.9.2.3a and b, 6.9.3.la through c. The detailed definitions for each criterion are presented in Table 4-3

• 216
• *
• VALIDATION OF CR FUNCTIONS

1. Familiarize operators with objective and method -emphasize that this is an evaluation of the control room: CR layout, control panel layout and operator workload.

We are not evaluating the EOPs. 2. Select the appropriate procedure from the attached list, and instruct the operators to conduct the procedure exactly as they would during an actual event, particularly with regard to allocation of function/responsibility.

3. Confer with the simulator instructor to set up the simulator to challenge the appropriate safety functions.

4. Fill out the upper portion of the data sheet: Event-name of transient being simulated (e.g., SGTR, ATWS following loss of off-site power); Malfunction No-number of simulated event; Functions-safety functions being challenged (e.g., RCS inventory, containment integrity);

ERG #-number of EOP used (e.g., E-2, ECA-O.O).

5. Observe operators walking through event in real time. Record any problems with CR layout, Panel layout, Workload on the data sheet. NOTE: Do not be constrained by these categories, record any HF problem you observe. 6. When the real time walk-through is completed, have the operators walk-through the event again, one step at a time. Observe each operator decision-action sequence, ensuring that the necessary controls and displays are available, appropriately designed and appropriately located. Record any discrepancies.

7. Query the operators concerning the following CR characteristics:

a. Location of controls/displays.

b. Design of controls/displays.

c. Completeness of information/control capability.

d. Workload.

e. Communications.

f. CR layout. g. Any other comments concerning the event. Recor~ all operator comments on the data sheet. 8. Repeat steps 2 through 8 for the next event. FIGURE 4-3A INSTRUCTIONS FOR VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS 217 VEPCO VALIDATION

• Page_of __ PLANT _____________ DATE _____________

_ EVENT ___________ _ MALFUNCTION NO(S) ----------- FUNCTION(S) ERG# ___ _ OBSERVATIONS CR LAYOUT HED# COMPONENT LOCATION HED# WORK LOAD HED#

• COMMENTS:
• FIGURE 4-3B VALIDATION OF CR FUNCTIONS DATA FORM 218
• *
• 4.3.2 Validation of Control Room Functions Findings The findings of the validation of control room functions process are presented in Table 4-3 "Validation of Control Room Functions." Overall, 73 criteria were applied to validation of control room function process. Of these, 11 (15%) were not applicable, 35 (48%) were in compliance, and 27 (37%) were not in compliance.

A total of 92 HEDs were generated which document all of the 27 criteria that were not met. Table 4-3 also includes the category assigned to each HED during the assessment meetings (see Section 5.0 for an explanation of assessment category). Note that the category "CPT" stands for complete and indicates that no further action needs to be taken on an HED

• 219
• *
• TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 1 of 12 liUIDELINE 6.1.1.2 CONSISTENCY OF MANNING _WITH EQUIPMENT LAYOUT a. b. COVERAGE -Control room manning and task assignments should ensure complete and timely coverage of controls, -.displays, and other equipment required during all modes of operation.

UTllJZATION OF ADDmONAL PERSONNEL -Additional on-site or site personnel may augment the normal crew complement under certain conditions (e.g., refueling). If *so, activities and task assignments should be planned to ensure proper coordination. (Note: special training for this situation may be required.) 6.1.3.1 UNIT INTEGRATION AND ENCE a. b. c. EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT -ment should be arranged with movement and communication patterns in mind, so that unit operations do not interfere with each other. SENIOR OPERATOR STATION -Senior operators who supervise and assist tions of more than one unit need to be tioned so that they can communicate effectively with operators in each unit and have an unobstructed visual path to the control boards of each unit. SHARING OF PERSONNEL -\\"here tors may assist those of another unit, tial task loading should be evaluated to assure that each unit can be covered quately in all situations. 6.1.3.2 UNIT MIRROR IMAGING If a mirror image design has been used: a. DEDICATED CREWS -Operational crews should be committed to one or the other unit. They should not be allowed to nate between the two mirrored units. This includes operators manning a single center desk station . 220 0, NO 23000402 III-8 20004201 CPT 0 YES 0 YES 0 NO 20001402 CPT 0 NO 20A04203 Ill-9 N/A N/A N/A NIA TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 2 of 12

• 0&/ ~/ I I ' E , I l $/ I IIUIDELINE 6.1.3.1 (Cont'd) b. ACCENTUATE DIFFERENCES

-The N/A N/A distinction between the mirrored units should be heightened as much as possible so that there will be no confusion e)Sout where one unit ends and the other begins. This can be done by using a different color scheme for the elements of each unit, including carpeting, desks, and other work station -equipment, as well as the board surface areas. 6.4.2.2 CODING OF CONTROLS f(2) When color coding is used to relate a control 0 YES Background to its corresponding display, the same color shading by system should be used for both the control and the display. 6.4.3.1 PUSHBUTION DESIGN PRINCIPLES

a. POSITION -Pushbuttons in a row or matrix 0 YES Background

• should be positioned in a logical order, or in shading by system an order related to the procedural sequence.

6.8.1.1 ASSIGNING PANEL CONTENTS Controls and displays should be placed within the control room at locations which promote efficient procedures, safe operation, and maximum opera-tor awareness of the current system condition. There are three general methods for achieving this condition. They are: (a) grouping by task sequence, (b) grouping by system function, and (c) grouping by importance and frequency of use. a. GROUPING BY TASK SEQUENCE -Con-0 NO 23001206 11-7 tro),s and displays should be assigned to work 23001223 11-5 stations so as to minimize operator move-23001224 Ill-7 ment. To the extent practical, this assign-23001225 11-5 ment should consider both normal and emer-gency procedures. It should be practical to perform all frequently occurring routine tasks with a minimum of human movement from panel to panel

• 221 i TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 3 of 12 ..
• I I , i' I , . &UIDELINE I GI I , 6.8.1.1 (Cont'd) b. GROUPING BY SYSTEM FUNCTION -0 NO 20A02119 11-6 Within the c*onstraints of grouping by task 20A02048 11-5 sequence, controls and displays should be 20001205 11-7 assigned to panels in functional groups 20001220 11-5 related to system structure.

This grouping 20001221 III-7 should promote easy understanding of the 20001222 11-5 relationship between controls and system, 23001206 III-9 and should assist graphic or pictorial display 23001223 11-6 or system relationships. 23001224 Il-6 23001225 III-9 c. GROUPING BY IMPORTANCE AND NIA N/A FREQUENCY OF USE -Within the constraints of grouping by task sequence and by system function, controls and displays should be assigned to panels depending on

• their importance and frequency of use. Controls or displays which are neither important to plant safety not frequently used should be installed in secondary panel locations. .
• I 6.8.1.2 EFFECTNE PANEL LAYOUT The location of controls and displays within a 0 YES single panel should make the effective use of the viewing and manual manipulative areas. The allocation of panel positions should first ensure the integrity of arrangement or grouping by system function and task sequence.

Within those . constraints, consideration should be given to the following factors: (a) the frequency with which controls and displays are used; (b) the significance of controls and displays in terms of their possible use during an emergency; (c) the importance of controls and displays to overall system performance; and ( d) special requirements in using a control device or display instruments, such as the need for accuracy, speed, application of force, or a particular type of movement. 6.8.1.3 ENHANCING RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION

a. SPACING -Spacing consists of physically 0 YES separating groups of components on a panel with enough space between groups so that the boundaries of each group are obvious. Spacing between groups should be at least

• the width of a typical control or display in -.. the group (see Exhibit 6.8-1). 222 TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL.ROOM

_FUNCTIONS Page 4 or 12 * /1/IIG1!1! R # &UIDELINE 6.8.1.3 (Cont'd) b. DEMARCATION -Demarcation consists or 0 YES Also use color circumscribing functional or selected groups shading. of controls and displays with a contrasting line. The application of demarcation tech-. niques should conform to Guideline 6.6.6.2 (See also Exhibit 6.8-1).) 6.8.2.1 SEQUENCE, FREQUENCY OF USE, AND FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

a. SEQUENCE -Con"trols and displays which 0 NO 23A01005 1-5 are used together during a normal task sequence should be grouped together.

(1) Displays which are observed in a 0 NO 20A03004 1-2 specified sequence, as during hot-leg 20J13020 ll-7 temperature check for all reactor 20V13021 lll-9 coolant loops, should be grouped 20V13022 1-2

• together.

It is desirable that they be 20A03023 1-3 positioned so that they are normally 20A03025 11-7 used in a left-to-right, top-to-bottom, 20A03024 1-5 or other natural sequence. 20A03026 ll-7 20V22407 ll-6 20V23027 CPT 20V23028 CPT 20B23029 11-5 20A03031 11-6 20A03058 CPT (2) Controls which are operated in 0 NO 20A01215 11-6 sequence, as in energizing a system or 23003019 II-6 aligning fl series of valves for a particular function, should be grouped together. It is desirable that they be , positioned so that they are normally used in a left-to-right, top-to-bottom, or other natural sequence. (3) When there is a set of related controls 0 YES and displays, the layout of displays should be symmetrical with the controls they represent.

• 223 TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 5 of 12
• Y// /// ; / I G $ I I $/ ! , IIUIOELINE 4:' 6.8.2.la. (Cont'd) b. FREQUENCY OF USE -Frequently .used 0 NO 20A03004 1-2 controls and displays should be arranged to 20J13020 Il-7 reduce search time and minimize the 20V13021 Ill-9 potential for error during use. 20V13022 1-2 20A03023 1-3 20A03025 Ill-8 20A03024 1-5 22F23026 11-7 20V22407 Il-6 20V23027 CPT 20V23028 CPT 20823029 11-5 20A03031 Il-6 20A03058 CPT (1) They should be near the center of the preferred visual and manual areas. (2) They should be positioned so as to be easily identified.

c. FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

-0 NO 20A03004 1-2

• Functionally related controls and displays 20J13020 Il-7 should be grouped together when they are: 20V13021 Ill-9 20V13022 1-2 20A03023 1-3 20A03025 Ill-8 20A03024 1-5 22F23026 Il-7 20V22407 Il-6 20V23027 CPT .. 20V23028 CPT 20823029 Il-5 20A03031 Il-6 20A03058 CPT (1) Used together to perform tasks related to a specific function (e.g., operation of the residual heat removal system). (2) Identical in purpose (e.g., reactor coolant pumps). 6.8.2.2 LOGICAL ARRANGEMENT AND 0 NO 20A03209 11-6 LAYOUT b. OTHER EXPECTATIONS

-Where other operator expectations can be identified,

• components should be arranged to match 22A03034 I-2 these expectations.

0 NO 224 TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 6 ort2

• 0~! ~/ f, If . G $ I I $/ I I llUIDELINE

_, 6.8.2.3 LAYOUT CONSISTENCY The location and arrangement of recurring functional groups and of individual components of those groups should be similar from panel to panel or within a panel. a. REPEATED FUNCTIONS -The layout of 0 NO 20003017 1-2 identical control or display sets should be consistent at all locations.

b. MIRROR-IMAGING

-Layouts of repeated 0 NO 22A03215 II-7 functions should not be mirror-imaged. 6.8.2.4 STANDARDIZATION When a precedent has been established in the arrangement and location of controls and displays, that standard practice should be followed unless other crucial considerations necessitate a change. a. PANEL TO PANEL STANDARDIZATION -0 NO 20A02103 II-5 Standardization should be maintained where 20A01311 II-6

• similar functions or panels are located at 20A01312 II-7 several work stations or units are located at 20A01313 II-6 several work stations or units and must be 20A01314 Ill-9 used by the same personnel.

20A01315 ll-7 20A01316 11-6 b. SIMULATOR-TO-CONTROL ROOM 0 NO 23A01002 Il-6 STANDARDIZATION -Standardization should be maintained where simulators or procedure trainers are used that simulate the actual operational equipment. 6.8.3.2 STRINGS OR CLUSTERS OF SIMILAR COMPONENTS On occasion it may be necessary to have a large group of similar components arranged together in strings, matrices, or other clusters. Those human factors principles presented in Section 6.8.2, Layout Arrangement Factors, should not be compromised where large clusters of components are concerned. However, considerations such as search time, discriminability of components, and avoidance of selection errors will often make a string or matrix the preferred arrangement. The following criteria should apply: a. ORIENTATION -Horizontal rows of 0 NO 20A02040 CPT displays should be used rather than vertical

• columns (see Exhibit 6.8-4) 225 TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 7 or 12
• 1/l/~1!1/ # 4 liUIDELIIIIE ----6.8.3.2 (Cont 1 d) b. STRING LENGTH -Strings of small 0 NO 20A02041 CPT displays should not exceed about 20 inches on the control board. I ./ c. NUMBER OF COMPONENTS 0 NO 20A02041 CPT (1) No more than 5 similar components should be laid out in an unbroken row or column. (2) If more than 5 similar components must be laid out together, the string or cluster should be broken up by tech-niques such as physical spacing or demarcation (see Exhibit 6.8-5). 6.8.3.3 MIRROR IMAGING Mirror-imaging is an arrangement in which two 0 NO 20A02042 Il-7 functional groups are laid out symmetrically so that one is a complete, or almost complete,
• reversal of the other. Mirror-imaging should not be used, and any recurring functional groups should be replicated.

6.9.1.1 SINGLE CONTROL AND DISPLAY PAIRS Controls and displays which are normally used together should be located in close proximity to each other, but positioned and separated sufficiently so that the display is not obstructed during operation.

a. PROXIMITY

-A visual display that will be 0 YES monitored during control manipulation should be located sufficiently close that an operator can read it clearly and without parallax from a normal opera ting posture. b. OBSCURATION -Controls and displays 0 YES should be located so that displays are not obscured during control operation (see Exhibit 6.9-1) .

• 226
• * * ------------------------------------~

TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 8 of 12. ~~11 ,~ ;:,; $ I ;.I~ -~ I _________ _:G::;Ul::,:DE:::Ll:;:,;NE:__ ________ -f---*;...+---+--~___;;...._+--""-1:...----"'"----1 6.9.1.1 (Cont'd) c. ASSOCIATION -Related controls and displays should be easily identified as being associated. This association can be established (or enhanced) by (1) location, (2) labeling, (3) coding, (4) demarcation, and (5) consistency with operator expectations. The following relationships should be immediately apparent to the operator: (1) Association of displays with controls. (2) The direction -0f movement of control and display. (3) The rate and limits of movement of the control and display. 6.9.1.2 MULTIPLE CONTROLS OR DISPLAYS The control and monitoring of nuclear power plant systems will occasionally require either multiple controls or multiple displays. Control display relationships in multiple arrays should be apparent to the operator and consistent with human expectations.

a. MULTIPLE CONTROLS, SINGLE DISPLAY -(1) Controls should be mounted below the display. (2) Controls should be centered on the display. (3) Controls should be grouped in a line or matrix. (4) If not feasible to mount controls directly below the display, controls should be mounted to the right of the display. (5) Where there is a normal order of use, controls should be arranged for use in left-to-right, top-to-bottom, or other natural sequence . 227 0 YES Color shading NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA 'NIA

• *
• TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 9 of 12 IIUIDELINE 6.9.1.2 (Cont'd) (6) Where the above techniques cannot apply, or where tor other reasons the relationships are not readily apparent, layout enhancement techniques should be employed -spacing, demarcation, color shading, insert panels, panel relief, and the use of mimics *. See Guideline 6.8.t.3. b. SINGLE CONTROL, MULTIPLE DJSPLAYS-(1) Displays should be located above the control (2) The control should be placed as near as possible to the display, and pref ably underneath the center of the display array. (3) Displays should be arranged horizontally or in a matrix . (4) . If it is not feasible to mount displays above the control, they should be mounted.to the left of the control (5) Where there is a normal order of use, displays should read from right, top-to-bottom, or in other natural sequence.

(6) Where the above techniques cannot apply, or where for other reasons the\! control-display relationship is not clearly apparent, layout enhancement techniques should be employed. See Guideline 6.8.1.3. (7) Displays should not be obscured during control manipulation.

c. DISPLAY SELECTORS

-Where displays are selected for viewing using a rotary selector switch, the following should apply: (1) The control should move clockwise from OFF (if appropriate) through tings 1, 2, 3 ... n . 228 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES* 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES 0 YES G I Color shading

---

, I ' TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 10 of 12 * '!. ~I b I , I I IUIDELINE

/ I , f. ; ________ _;;.,;..;;.;;.~~-------+--+---+-----t---r-------; 6.9.2.1 (Cont'd) (2) The control room position sequence 0 NO 22A01219 ll-7 should conform to the display -sequence. (3) Control position indications should 0 YES correspond with display labels. . 6.9.2.1 LOCATION AND ARRANGEMENT OF CONTR01rDISPLA Y GROUPS a. FUNCTIONAL INTEGRITY -Multiple 0 YES controls or displays related to the same function (e.g., power, status, test) should be grouped together.

b. SEQUENCE OF USE -Sequence of use should be as follows: (1) Left to right. (2) Top to bottom . * (3) The above combined (normal reading 0 YES order). 6.9.2.2 SINGLE PANEL ARRANGEMENTS Appropriate arrangements for control-display relationship, in order of preference, are (a) display above each control, (b) displays and controls in matched rows, and (c) multi-row displays with a single row of controls.

Practice should be consistent, so that operator expectations are not confused.

a. DISPLAY ABOVE EACH CONTROL -The preferred configuration is as shown by Exhibit 6.9-3, with the display above each control. If this configuration is used the following should apply: (1) Each display should be located directly 0 YES above its associated control (2) The display /control pairs should be 0 YES arranged in rows *

• 229
• * * -----------------------------

TABLE4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 11 o! 12 IIUIDEi.lNE 6.9.2.2 (Cont'd) b.* CONTROIS AND DISPLAYS IN ROWS -As an alternative, displays may be arrayed in rows as the upper portion of a panel, matched to controls arrayed in similar rows below, as shown in Exhibit 6.9-4. (1) Each control should occur the same relative position as the display to which it is associated. (2) Controls and displays should have corresponding labels. c. MULTI-ROW DISPLAYS WITH ROW CONTROIS -A less desired arrangement is that of Exhibit 6.9-5, in which two or more rows of displays are arrayed above a single row of controls.

d. e. (1) Displays should be ordered left to right and top to bottom (in normal reading order), and matched to controls ordered left to right. (2) Controls and displays should have corresponding labels. CONSISTENT PRACTICE -. Arrangements of functionally similar controls and displays should conform to the same convention throughout the control room. CONTROL/DISPLAY PACKAGES -When controls and related displays are assembled using modular packaged units, the design of the packages will limit the location and arrangement which can be achieved.

In this case, modules should be selected and arranged to achieve maximum conformity with the principles described above. 6.9.2.3 CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS IN SEPARATE PLANF.S a. SEP ARA TE CONTROIS AND DISPLAYS -Where displays are on separated panels, they should preferably be on the adjacent upper panel from their associated controls. See Exhibit 6.9-6 . 230 1///,1/1/ 0 NO 23001207 Il-5 23A03210 Il-6 23A03211 Il-7 23A03212 11-7 0 YES N/A N/A 0 YES 0 NO 23001207 Il-5 N/A N/A 0 YES TABLE 4-3 VALIDATION OF CONTROL ROOM FUNCTIONS Page 12 of 12

• r//1 I , I # IIUIDELiNE I l $~# ! _, 6.9.2.3 (Cont'd) b. FACING PANELS -In no case should 0 YES related controls and displays be located on separate panels that face each other. 6.9.3.1 GENERAL MOVEMENT RELATIONSHIPS

a. ROTARY CONTROLS -Rotary controls 0 NO 23A03218 Il-6 should turn clockwise to cause an increase in parameter value. The associated display movements should be as follows: (1) Linear scales, up or to the right. 0 YES (2) Digital displays, increasing in value. 0 YES (3) Strings of indicator lights, bottom-to-0 YES top or left-to-right.

(4) Circular meter pointers, clockwise. 0 NO 23A03218 Il-6 b. LINEAR CONTRO~ -Linear controls

• should move up or to the right to cause an increase in parameter value. The associated display relationships should be: (1) Linear scales, up or to the right. 0 YES (2) Digital scales, increasing in value. 0 YES (3) Strings of indicator lights, bottom-to-0 YES top, or left-to-right.

c. DISPLAY RESPONSE TIME LAG -0 NO 22A03216 ll-6 22A03217 1-5 (1) There should be no time lag between system condition change and display indication.

(2) When there is a time lag between 0 NO 22A03206 1-1 control actuation and ultimate system 22A03216 ll-6 state, there should be an immediate 22A03217 1-5 feedback indication of the process and direction of parameter change .

• 231
• *
• 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF HEDs NUREG-0700 defines a Human Engineering Discrepancy, or HED, as "a departure from some benchmark of system design suitability for the roles and capabilities of the human operator." Section 6 of NUREG-0700 contains these design benchmarks or guidelines.

While it can be expe9ted that the CRDR process will produce reports of Human Engineering Discrepancies, it does not follow that all discrepancies will sarily degrade operator performance to the point that plant operation would be affected. The objective of the assessment process was for the HED Assessment Team (HEDAT) to evaluate the relative significance of the HEDs produced during the review phase. During assessment, those HEDs that are unlikely to degrade performance were separated from those that may degrade performance.

5.1 Introduction

to Assessment The first step in the assessment process was to determine if a* Preliminary HED represented any departure from guidelines. If so, the assessment team considered potential for inducing error, consequences of induced error, and safety importance of the HED. Then, during the disposition process, the assessment team selected the means by which the HED will be corrected, or it provided a justification for any discrepancy not fully corrected. All HEDs, including Preliminary HEDs, were reviewed by a committee consisting of, as a minimum, one senior human factors specialist, one nuclear systems engineer, one l&C engineer, two operations specialists (one from Surry Power Station, one from North Anna Power Station) and one operations specialist with experienc~ in the human factors aspects of plant operations. The assessment methodology described below differs frorri that described in the Program Plan. The decision process itself, in terms of the issues addressed (i.e., potential for error, consequences of error, and safety importance), is the same. However, the methodology does represent an improvement in approach. While the methodology used was still more qualitative than quantitative, it was less subjective than the approach described in the Program Plan. In the approach used, three simple yes/no responses, followed by two ratings on numerical* scales,* were required. To further reduce the subjectivity of the process, criteria lists were provided for the numerical ratings . 232

• *
• 5.2 The Assessment Process The assessment process entailed the following activit.ies (see Figure 5-1, HED Priority Record):
• Determine if each Preliminary HED is, in fact, an HED.
• If so, determine if the error has been documented (No/Yes).
• If documented, determine if unsafe condition or tech. spec. violation resulted (No/Yes).
• If not documented, assess potential for error on a six-point scale.
• Assess if HED is of high safety importance (No/Yes).
• Assess the consequences of error occurrence on a six-point scale.
• Based on the above, assign an HED category/priority (from 1-1 to III-9). The HED Priority Record (Figure 5-1) contains a section for assessment and a logic
• diagram. The diagram shows how the assessment data were integrated to assign categories and priorities to HEDs. 5.2.1 Determine if a PHED is an HED As defined above, an HED is a departure from the human factors guidance contained in NUREG-0700 or from other appropriate benchmarks of human factors design. As a first step in the assessment process, a: determination was made as* to whether or not a Preliminary HED did, in fact, represent such a departure.

If, in the considered judgment of the assessment team, a Preliminary* HED was determined to represent an _actual deviation, the remaining steps in the assessment process were carried out. If not, the reason for ending consideration of the PHED was recorded, and the PHED was retained in the data files. Reasons that nondiscrepant items were occasionally documented as PHEDs include:

• Misinterpretation of interview/questionnaire items by operators
• Plant issues that are out of the scope of the CRDR (if appropriate, these were referred to other Virginia Electric and Power Company entities)
• Misinterpretation of operator responses by interviewers
• Incomplete.or ambiguous interview/questionnaire responses
• Misunderstanding by HF reviewers of the ways components or systems function
• Issues that have been corrected during the period between data collection and assessment.

-233

• *
• HED PRIORITY RECORD HED # 1. DOCUMENTED ERROR? 2. DOCUMENTED UNSAFE CONDITION OR TECH. SPEC. VIOLATION?.

3. HIGH SAFETY IMPORTANCE

4. ERROR POTENTIAL?

5. CONSEQUENCE OF ERROR: CATEGORY I YES DOCUMENTED UNSAFE CONDITON OR TECH SPEC VIOLATION NO NO NO 1 2 3 LOW 1 2 3 LOW HED YES NO 4 4 CATEGORY II NO FIGURE 5-1 HED PRIORITY RECORD 234 YES YES YES 5 _6_ HIGH 5 _6_ HIGH CATEGORY Ill NO 0

• *
• Before ending consideration of the PHED, efforts were made to ensure that the assessment team understood the issue involved.

For example, this might have entailed checking an ambiguous interview response. If any disagreement between assessment team members could not be resolved at this step or on any of the following steps, the disagreement was noted on the HED record. 5.2.2 Determine if Documented Error Given that no control system can be designed to be operationally error-free, one purpose of the assessment process was to estimate Human Engineering Discrepancy impact on hypothetical (unknown) baseline error rates of control room components; i.e., will additional errors be induced by discrepancies from the guidelines? Estimates of Human Engip.eering Discrepancy

• impact on error occurrence were determined tatively.

If the HED had previously resulted in a documented error, the potential for error was considered to be absolute. For an HED to be considered as having resulted in a documented error, the error had to be recorded on an LER, Shutdown and Trip Report, Station Deviation Report, Engineering Work Request, or on other plant documents such as operations log sheets. If a document error had occurred, then. "Documented Error?" was circled "YES" on the HED Priority Record

• 5.2.3 Determine if Unsafe Conditions or Tech. Spec. Violation If the HED had resulted in a documented error as described above, a determination was made as to whether or not the error involved an unsafe condition or a violation of technical specifications.

The document review and the expertise of the operations and enginering members of the assessment team were relied upon for this determination. If the error had resulted in an unsafe condition, or if a violation of technical specifications had occurred, the appropriate YES" was circled on the HED Priority Record. 5.2.4 Assess Potential for Error If no documented error related to the HED had occurred, then as shown on the HED Priority Record, an assessment of error potential was generated on a six-point scale based on the interact.ion of the discrepancy with the criteria given in Table 5-1, "Potential for Error Assessment Criteria." A rating of 11 1 11 indicates that a low probability of induced errors is expected as a result of the Human Engineering Discrepancy, and 11 6 11 indicates a high probability of additional errors being induced

• 235
• *
• TABLE 5-1 CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF ERROR POTENTIAL The following criteria were considered in assigning the Error Potential.

rating: 1. The nature of discrepancy, including the following factors: (a) The impact of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to perceive and discriminate input information. Considerations include: Whether required information is provided. The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to locate, read, and interpret displays of interest. The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to see and hear. * (b) The impact of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to process information. Considerations include: The likelihood of exceeding the operator's information processing capability. The likelihood of causing confusion or distraction. Operator fatigue or discomfort which may be caused by the discrepancy. Additional processing steps or processing errors which

• may be introduced by the discrepancy. (c) The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to perform required actions. Considerations include: Whether required controls are provided.

The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to locate the control. The effect of the discrepancy upon the operator's ability to use the control. 2. Conditions of stress which may exist when associated tasks are performed.

3. The past occurrence of errors as a result of the discrepancy.

4. The degree and prevalence of the deviation.

5. The familiarity of the components and systems involved.

6. The frequency with which the associated components and systems are used.

• J 236
• *
• 5~2.5 Assess Safety Importance For all HEDs a determination was made as to whether or not the HED was of high safety importance.

This was based upon the collective judgment of the HEDAT members as to whether or not the affected component or components were part of a safety-related* system. Important considerations included in this determination

• were whether the component was qualified as REG 1.97 equipment, if the component was classified as lE, or if the component is necessary for r~covery from an accident.
• If the HED was determined to be of high safety importance, the appropriate "YES" was circled on the HED Priority Record. 5.2.6 Assess Consequences of Error Occurrence The effect of the hypothesized error on plant operations was assessed on a six-point scale as shown on the HED Priority Record. The criteria for assessment of error consequence are shown in Table 5-2. 5.3 HED Category/Priority The logic diagram on the HED Priority Record shows how assessment determinations were integrated to assign a category and priority for each HED
• Category (I, II, or III) was assigned by determining if the HED involved a documented error or .by rating the potential for error. That is, Category I Human Engineering Discrepancies are those which have been noted from documented operational errors or problems reported by operators.

All Category I Human Engineering Discrepancies are . deemed to increase error potential, but consequences must still be assigned to determine ultimate significance. Category II Human Engineering Discrepancies are those cies noted during CR surveys, task analysis, and/or operator interviews, which have been determined to be of valid concern and may warrant corrective action, but for which. no documented cases of operator error were found during the Review of Operating Experience, but which have an error potential greater than "3.11 Category III Human Engineering Discrepancies are those discrepancies noted by CR surveys and/or operator performance interviews which have been determined to have little impact on operator performance, and for which no documented cases of operator error were found during the Review of Operating Experience

• 237
• *
• TABLE 5-2 CONSEQUENCE OF ERROR ASSESSMENT CRITERIA The following criteria will be considered in assigning the Consequence of Error rating: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 . 9. 10 . The risk of injury to the ,,public.

The risk of injury to plant personnel. The potential effort of the error upon operating margins to safety limits. The importance of the components and systems involved. The availability of alternate systems and components. The ability of automatic protective features to compensate for the error. The ability of the operator to detect the error. The ability of the operator to recover from the error. The potential for the error causing additional errors. The risk of equipment damage. 238

• *
• Once an HED had been categorized, its priority (1 -9) was assigned by determining, as described above: o If the HED had resulted in an unsafe condition or tech. spec. violation o If the HED was of high safety importance o The seriousness of the consequences of error occurrence.

As shown on the HED Priority Record, priority varied from a value of 1 (most serious) to 9 (least serious). A category and a priority was assigned for each HED. The assessment status of an HED, therefore, varied from I-1 (most likely to degrade plant safety and operations) to III-9 (unrelated to plant safety and least likely to affect plant operations) . 239

• APPENDIX A OPERATOR QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORMS *
• A-1
• *
• A-1 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR VEPCQ CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW 221 * *
• VEPCO CRDR QUESTIONNAIRE Instructions

1. The following are questions concerning the operations within the control room. Most of the questions will require a YES or NO answer, with some additional information.

2. When you have comments or suggestions, use the space provided below each question.

If you need additional room, use the backs of the sheets. 3. If you do not understand a question, please contact any of the following people at Essex Corporation at (703) 548-4500:

• o Cliff Baker o Danna Beith o David Eike o Tom Talley o Harold Van Cott. 4. Please answer all of the questions as completely as possible citing as many examples as you wish. 5. If any question does not apply to your control room, please mark it as N/ A. 6. All of your answers and your biographical information will be kept in the strictest confidence and will be used only to aid in the performance of the detailed control room design review. No one at VEPCO will see your answers. 7. When you finish the questionnaire, please put it in the envelope provided and mail it to Essex Corporation .
• *
• 221 VEPCO CRDR QUESTIONNAIRE BIOGRAPHICAL DAT A: Name: Age:------

Sex: Height: Weight:------ Current Position/Title:

1. Do you have a current reactor operator's license? YES NO 2. Amount of licensed experience at th.is plant: --------------

3. Total amount licensed experience:

4. Related experience and amount (example:

operator-trainee, Hodge NPP Unit 1, 1 yr.): 5. Education:

a. Highest level attained:

b. Specialized Schools or courses (list): 6. Military experience:

221

• 1. 2. 3.
• 4. 5.
• QUESTIONNAIRE Have you experienced any problems performing a task or job due to inadequate staffing?

If yes, please explain. / Have you experienced any problems performing a task or job due to a requirement to perform several tasks concurrently or simultaneously? If yes, please expiain. Have you experienced any problems performing a function due to the lack of controls available to you at the control board?

• If yes, please explaiil:.

Are there any pr_actices or procedures relating to plant maintenance that interfere with control room operations? If yes, please explain. Are there any areas in the operator training that you feel are not adequately covered? ,. If yes, please explain . YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• * ** 221 6 . 7. Is there anything related to your operator training that your would like to see changed? If yes, please explain. Are there any tasks that you are required to perform that are not adequately covered in the procedures?

If yes, please explain. 8.

• Have you ever experienced any problems accessing/retrieving

9. 10. procedures/reference materials?

If yes, please explain . Are there any areas in the control room that are*uncomfortable because of temperature or humidity? If yes, please explain. Have you ever experienced any difficulties communicating between any two points in the control room? If yes, please explain . YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO 221

• 11. 12. 13.
• 14. 15.
• Have you ever experienced any difficulties performing a function due to communication problems?

If yes, please explain. Are any auditory signals too loud that they interfere with speech? If yes, please explain. Are there areas in the control room where illumination is not sufficient or is too bright? If yes, please explain . Have you experienced any problems assessing the status/availability of equipment shared between units? If yes, please explain. Have you experienced any problems with the rotation of or sharing of control room personnel between Units 1 and 2? If yes, please explain . YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO 221

• 16 . 17. 18.
• 19, 20.
• Have you experienced any problems in viewing control and display panels (including annunciator panels) from desks and consoles placed .in the primary operating area? If yes, please explain. Have you experienced any problems reading any displays located on the control panels? If yes, please explain. Have you experienced any problems operating any controls located on the control panels? If yes, please explain . Have you ever accidentally activated a control, or do you know of any controls that have been accidentally activated?

If yes, please explain. Did you ever make an error in performing a function because of problems with the existing design of controls and displays? If yes, please explain . YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO 221

• 21. 22. 23.
• 24. 25.
• Are any controls, displays, or other equipment items inappropriately .labeled or not clearly labeled to describe the primary function?

If yes, please explain. Do any labels contain wording or abbreviations that are not commonly used/accepted by the operators? If yes, please give examples. Are there any annunciator alarms that occur so frequently that you consider them a nuisance? If yes, please give examples . Have you ever experienced any problems with the computer system? If yes, please explain. Have you ever experienced problems with reading characters or identifying graphic symbols on the control room CRTs? If yes, please explain . YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO 221

• 26 . 27. *
• Are there any other areas in the control room design or layout that you have had problems with? If yes, please explain. Is there anything you would like to see changed in the control room? If yes, please explain . YES NO YES NO
• *
• i A-2 INTERVIEW FOR VEPCO CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW
• **
• 221 VEPCO APPENDIX B2 *oPERATOR INTERVIEWS BIOGRAPHICAL DAT A: Name: Age: ------Sex: Height: Weight: ------Current Position/Title:

1. Do you have a current reactor operator's license? YES NO 2.

• Amount of licensed experience at this plant: --------------

3. Total amount licensed experience:

4. Related experience and amount (example:

operator-trainee, Hodge NPP Unit 1, 1 yr.): 5. Education:

a. Highest level attained:

b. Specialized Schools or courses (list): 6. Military experience:

B2-2

• *
• 221 1. VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE Are all the instrumentation and equipment necessary for you to detect abnormal plant conditions present in the control room? If no, please explain. 2.

• Are all the instrumentation and equipment necessary for you to bring the plant to a safe shutdown condition present in the control room? 3. 4. 5. If no, please explain. Are there any operational sequences in which you are required to leave the primary operating area to attend to instrumentation on other panels when continuous monitoring or control actions may be critical?
• If yes, please explain. Are you aware of any cases in which control of shared plant ment from one control room will interfere with the operators' ability to control the shared equipment from the other control room? If yes, please explain. Is the status of all shared plant equipment, including availability status, displayed in both control rooms? If no, please explain
• B2-3 TP-9.8 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
• *
• 221 6. VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE Are there administrative procedures available that assign bility for allocation of use of controls for shared equipment in a single control room? If yes, what is the procedure name and number? 7. * (I & C) Were operator tasks analyzed to determine operator mation requirements prior to selection of control room display? 8. 9. 10. If yes, is a copy of the task analysis available? Do the visual displays in the control room provide all the information that you need to meet task requirements for normal, abnormal, and emergency operations? If no, please explain. Are there any visual displays in the control room that are unncessary or should be replaced by more important displays? If yes, please explain. Are there any redundant displays that are not needed for backup or to avoid excessive operator movement? If yes, please explain . B2-4 TP-9.8 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO 221

• 11. 12. 13.
• 14. 15. 16.
• VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE Are all displays that present equipment status clearly labelled to indicate whether the display is of actual or demand status? If no, please explain. Are there any displays that indicate demand status that you believe should indicate actual status? If yes, please explain. ~s there always a positive indication that an instrument, such as a meter, has failed or become inoperative? If no, please explain . Are there any displays that have scales that do not provide the cision or accuracy you require when using them? If yes, please explain. Are there any displays that require you to perform some form of conversion in order for you to effectively use the information (e.g., converting percent level to gallons in a storage tank)? If yes, please explain. Are there any displays that indicate percentage instead of level or flow as some other value that would be more useful to you? If yes, please explain . B2-5 TP-9.8 l May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO 221

• 17. 18. 19.
• 20. 21.
• VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE Are all display scales adequate in terms of the range they span, or are they at least supported by auxiliary wide-range instruments? If no, please explain. Are there any displays that are difficult to use because they display normal random variations in equipment performance? If yes, please explain. Are there any displays for which information is required to use the display (e.g., multiply display value by 100) but the information is not located on or adjacent to the display? If yes, please explain. When you have to compare two or more displays of the same parameter (e.g., pressure, level) are the scales always compatible in terms of numerical progression and scale design? If no, please explain. Are there any unnecessary logarithmic scales in the control room? If yes, please explain . B2-6 TP-9.8 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 22. 23. 24. VERIFICATION OF TASK PERFORMANCE APPENDIX 82 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE Are there any unnecessary multiscale indicators (i.e, single pointer, multiple* scales) in the control room? If yes, please explain. *, j For selectable displays (e.g., multiple channel displays), nonselected displays read off-scale, not zero. If no, please explain. Do all controls provide the precision necessary for you to easily and effectively control the affected parameter? If no, please explain. 25. Do displays of controlled parameters allow you to distinguish cant levels (changes) in the parameter being controlled. If no, please explain. 26~ Are there any controls or displays that are either overly precise or not precise enough for the tasks you have to perform? 27. If yes, please explain. Is adequate feedback concerning control movement available through control room displays. If no, please explain . 82-7 TP-9.8 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 WORKSPACE APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Have you experienced any problems in viewing control and display panels (including annunciator panels) from desks and consoles placed in the primary operating area? 2.(3) Are you able to perform task actions in a convenient position at any work station? 3.(6) Is the access and movement of nonessential but authorized personnel limited to prescribed areas within the control room? 4.(7) Are provisions made for easy access to procedure manuals and other reference mat~rials while task sequences are peformed at consoles? , 5.(10) Are you able to work comfortably at desks, with proper surface height and area, and adequate knee room and chair height? B2-8 TP-1.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 WORKSPACE APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(12) Are there suitable, out-of-the-way but secure places for storage of the personal belongings of control room personnel, with adequate space? 7 .(13) Do you consider the control room environment generally comfortable in terms of color and lighting? 8.(16) Does the carpeting or other floor covering in the control room lessen the fatigue of standing and walking? 9.(17) Do control room personnel have unlimited access to a restroom and kitchen that are dedicated to their use? 10.(18) Do these facilities have communication links to the control room, if they are out of voice contact range? B2-9 TP-1.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 ANTHOPOMETRICS APPENDIX 82 OPERATOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Have you ever had any problems operating a control because it was too high? If yes, please explain: 2.(2) Have you ever had any problems operating a control because it was too low? If yes, please explain: 3.(3) Are there any controls that are located in such a way that it makes operating the control awkward (i.e., resting hand on panel, leaning on rail, etc.)? If yes, please explain: 4.(4) Are there any controls that are inconveniently located? If yes, please give examples: 82-10 TP-1.2 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 ANTHOPOMETRICS

-APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW /QUESTIONNAIRE 5.(5) Have you ever had any problems reading a display because it was too low? If yes, please give examples: 6.(6) Have you ever had any problems reading a display because it was too high? If yes, please give examples: B2-ll TP-1.2 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) is all emergency equipment that is needed by control room personnel in the .control .room area? 2.(5) Are all operators well practiced in donning protective equipment? 3.(8) Is there protective clothing available that is compatible with your size? 4.(9) Is there breathing equipment available that is compatible with your size? 5.(12) Do you have any. problem performing your *general control room duties while wearing protective equipment? B2-12 TP-1.3 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(13) Do you have any problems communicating with others while wearing protective equipment, specifically breathing equipment? / 7 .(18) Is all fire, radiation, and rescue equipment easily and readily accessible? 8.(25) Are provisions available to assure complete internal and external communications capabilities during emergencies? B2-13 TP-1.3 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Are there any specific areas within the control room boundary that are not comfortable because of air flow or ventilation? 2.(2) Would you pref er room temperature to be warmer or cooler during winter and summer months? 3.(4) Are there noticeable fluctuations in control room climate conditions? 4.(5) Would you pref er a more constant room temperature? B2-14 TP-1.4 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 ILLUMINATION APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(3) Are there areas in the primary operating area where illumination is not sufficient for the task performed? 2.(4) Do shadows ever interfere with reading labels, instructions, and other written information? 3.(5) Does glare ever interfere with the readability of displays, labels, or indicators? 4.(6) Are colors used on panel surfaces, controls, and displays recognizable under both normal and emergency lighting conditions? B2-15 TP-1.5 l May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 AMBIENT NOISE APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Have you noticed any difficulty with verbal communications between any two points in the control room? 2.(2) Have you noticed any particular noise distractions originating inside the control room? 3.(3) Have you noticed any particular noise distractions originating outside the control room? 4.(4) Are there any particular time periods when noise levels are either too high or too low? 5.(5) Do you feel that general background noise is too high? B2-16 TP-1.6 l May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 MAINTAINABILITY APPENDIX 82 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Do you have an adequate supply of expendable items such as ink, pens, printer paper, etc.? If NO, please list the expendables and the amounts you feel you need. 2.(2) Do you have an adequate supply of spare parts such as fuses, bulbs, etc.? If NO, please list the spare parts and amounts you feel you need

• 3.(3) Do you have all necessary and special replacement tools that are needed to install expendables and spare parts available in the control room? If NO, please list the tools you need. 4.(7) Is there ample storage space available in the control room for expendables, spare parts, and tools? 5.(8) When different types, sizes, or styles of expendables are required, are they clearly visible? 82-17 TP-1.7 1 May 1983 YES NO .. YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
• *
• 221 MAINTAINABILITY APPENDIX B2 OPERATOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(9) When different types, sizes, or styles of spare parts are required, are they clearly marked? 7 .(13) If bulbs are replaced in annunciator panels that require legend tiles to be removed, are the tiles marked to ensure that they will be replaced in the correct position? 8.(21) Can you replace indicator light bulbs easily, with the power on, and without danger to yourself or the equipment? B2-18 TP-1.7 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 CQMMLNICA TIONS APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(3) Are there any conditions under which the conventional-powered phone system is difficult to use because of noise or some other factor? ./ If yes, please explain: 2.(4) Are there any conditions under which the sound-powered telephone system is difficult to use because of noise or other factors? If yes, please explain: 3.(5) Are there any conditions under which the walkie-talkie system is difficult to use because of noise or other factors? If yes, please explain: 4.(6) Are there any conditions under which the fixed-base UHF system is difficult to use because of noise or other factors? If yes, please explain: B2-19 TP-2.1 15 Aug 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 COMM~ICA TIONS APPENDIX 82 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 5.(7)

• Have you ever had any problems transmitting or receiving messages over the PA system? If yes, please explain: 6.(8) Does the PA system ever interfere with reception of incoming alarms? If yes, please explain:
• 7 .(9) Are emergency backup communications equipment adequate for all
• anticipated operating modes? If no, please explain: 82-20 TP-2.1 15 Aug 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO
• *
• 221 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(17) Do any of the alarm horns startle or irritate you? 2.(28) Are all tiles dark on annunciator panels when no alarm is indicated? 3.(29) Can you easily tell if a tile is normally on for an extended duration during normal operating conditions? 4.(30) Are you immediately aware if an annunciator tile is out of service? 5.(32) Do you know of any alarms that occur so frequently that you consider them a nuisance? B2-21 TP-3.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(33) Do you know of any alarms that do not give you ample time to respond to a warning condition? 7 .(34) When responding to an alarm tile, can you readily locate the controls and displays required for corrective or diagnostic action? 8.(38) If alarms are used that require information outside the control room, do they allow you ample time to respond? . B2-22 TP-3.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 CONTROLS APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Do you know of any controls that activate a critical function that do not have a movable cover or guard? 2.(3) Do you know of any areas on the board where controls are subject to accidental activation? 3.(5) Have you ever had difficulty activating a control because an adjacent control was in the way? 4.(6) Do you know of any controls that interlock unnecessarily? 5.(8) When a strict sequential activation is necessary, do you know of any controls which are not provided with some type of interlock? B2-23 TP-4.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 CONTROLS APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(10) Can you recall any controls that you are never required to use? 7 .(11) Are there any controls that are duplicated unnecessarily? 8.(13) Are there any controls that you would expect to be of a certain type or size, and they are not? 9.(24) Can you recall any knobs or handles of control switches that slip or are loose on their sha'fts? 10.(25) Are there any controls that move so easily that you can't tell when you've activated them? B2-24 TP-4.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 CONTROLS APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 11.(30) Do you know of any small J-handles/pistol grips handles that should be larger because of the torque required to operate them? 12.(34) Are there any controls that are difficult to adjust to the precise level you need? 13.(35) Do you get immediate feedback that a pushbutton has been activat.ed? B2-25

• TP-4.1
• 1 May 1983. YES NO YES NO YES NO
• *
• 221 DISPLAYS APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(2) Is system/equipment status inferred by any indicator light being off instead of illuminated?

• 2.(13) Do you know of any scale ranges which are too wide for the maximum displayed values (i.e., meter never indicates over half scale)? 3.(14) Do you know of any scales where maximum values are too large for the scale (i.e., pointer reaches maximum, then stops) and supporting wide-range instruments are not provided?

4.(15) Do all meters fail off-scale? 5.(17) Do you know of any multiscale displays (i.e., single pointer, multiple

• scales) that should be single scale displays?

B2-26 TP-5.1 1 May 1983 YE? NO YES. NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• * -** 221 DISPLAYS APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(18) Are any of the multiscale displays confusing to read? 7.(19) Are any displays difficult to read because of poor contrast between the pointer and the background? 8.(21) Are all recorders that you are required to use located within your primary work area? 9.(22) Do you know of any recorders that are used for a purpose other than to record trend information and material for later reference? 10.(25) Can you easily read all the data through the window of the recorder without opening it? B2-27 TP-5.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 DISPLAYS APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 11.(26) Do you know of any graphic recorders in which the ink clogs the pens or smudges the paper? 12.(29) Do you know of any strip chart or impact recorders in which the pens or the printing heads are frequently driven to their maximum, then tend to mechanically or electrically hang up? 13.(30) Where multiple channel inputs are control-or switch-selectable for display on a strip chart recorder, do you know of any case where after input selection, there is an appreciable delay before the parameter is actually displayed? B2-28 TP-5.1 1 May 19~3 YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS APPENDIX B2 OPE.RA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(7) Are controls, displays, and other equipment items appropriately and clearly labeled to enable rapid and accurate location, identification, and manipulation (if applicable)? 2.(8) Are labels pertinent to control actuation visible during actuation? 3.(10) Do labels describe the primary function of equipment items? 4.(11) Do the words employed in the label express exactly what action is intended, if action is necessary? 5.(12) Are instructions on labels clear and direct? B2-29 TP-6.l l May 1983 YES NO YES .NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS APPENDIX B2 OPERATOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 6.(13) Do words have a commonly accepted meaning for all users? 7 .(14) Are there any unusual technical terms used in labels? 8.(15) Are there any symbols (e.g., abstract symbols like %) which have uncommon meanings? 9.(18) Does the method used for "tagging-out" a control prevent actuation of the control? BZ-30 TP-6.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• 221 COMPUTER SYSTEM APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 1.(1) Have you ever experienced any problems with the computer system such as accessing a file or locating information? If yes, please explain: / 2.(2) Have you ever experienced any problems with the computer system printers? If yes, please explain: 3.(3) Have you ever experienced problems with the computer system CRTs? If yes, please explain: 4.(4) Have you ever experienced any problems with the computer system keyboards? If yes, please explain: B2-31 TP-7.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• * ** 221 COMPUTER SYSTEM APPENDIX B2 OPERA TOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 5.(6) Is the computer dialogue logical? If not, please explain: 6.(7) Is the computer dialogue vocabulary and syntax common to the operators who use the system? If not, please give examples: 7 .(8) Is the data presented on the CRT screen in a readily usable format? If not, please explain: 8.(9) Are urgent messages requiring an immediate response highlighted to attract the operator's attention? If not, please give examples: B2-32 TP-7.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• * ** 221 COMPUTER SYSTEM APPENDIX B2 OPERATOR INTERVIEW

/QUESTIONNAIRE 9.(11) Do general messages displayed on a CRT provide the information necessary to complete a specific action or decision sequence? If not, please explain: 10.(12) Are alarm messages readily distinguishable from other messages? If not, please give examples: 11.(13) Does the wording of alarm messages clearly relate to the specific annunciator tile that is illuminated? If not, please explain: 12.(16) Are graphs and tables displayed on CRTs easy to read or interpret? If not, please give examples: B2-33 TP-7.1 1 May 1983 YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

• *
• APPENDIX B SFRTA EXAMPLE: DETERMINATION OF ACTION AND INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS B-1
• *
• B-1 ACTION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS {AIRD) EXAMPLE I *
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) PLANT: __ S_u._'R_K~l/

____ UNIT:_.._\ _44---"~----"--- 7 REVIEWER: \,.J \'-So 1'.) ( E? -3. oo) ERG STEP TASK TASK NAME: feu1-ED STEAM <!:,f.NQ.tP.]J)~ \~O\.A\10 N NO.: E -g. NAME: e,e,\,fT]pf\l-AI u.A~ Dt-) s~ *' *

• NO.: I-CA1.AUQh!

.:L NAME: ...fl\AU.\:JIIIN s;w,. <>EtJ A,\/A\LA(',LE NO.:-----OBJECTIVE: ~~.A\,ID cCX)illOc.1)~.-* __ _ NATURE OF TASK: Contlnuoue __ ....\C... __ _ Discrete _____ _ BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS REMARKS:

• Sheet~\ __ of I DATE:.~-'--f\

j--'---'l~=----i/f-=8'-=5"~~~ / ca._m / Para-~, I I h hth/ £1,l 1 C c,, Verb I Sp~~ /**~ / **-/ DNtm I it : : Comment, .s Subsystem Direction Range . Rate " i1 ~. b I I "'

• c,, ..., l :t it! I ;g ,: l't\on ilov Re.;:,/ StM (£tJ s SiM &.EN~ . ".) ~,ioi~\e..

0 -1000 rs,~ so "~ i-1/'\ 'I ~i,,...\a..uv.. o.\ ~s\. ){°o<-'\ -<<-~.!> (Jy,J. C::ifw o.'JIM \C'o<,M LtJ~ L D-100 -'% l. 0 tJIA N/t\ 'I a_:, l,.._ii~ S1,l\\c. ~C..4'-\ ~.,j-I ftJMD\j._\ ~a. RC.~ <..oo\ciovm. t(o'"-\..e." 4! L *"l(o~ ~'N?,.5, ... .. -:, .. I I * *

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet PLANT: --~S'""""'u~R'---'---'-'R-j,____

___ UNIT: I J,, REVIEWER: CE W1LScH-.l DATE:__1/_,_I s-;::.,/'-'-~-'----s- ___ _ ( I= p -3, DO) ERG NAME: i:AULftl) !.TJ;AM (;,*.tJl:.ktfTOi!, l~OL.ATiy,J NO.: J; -STEP NAME: ~AwnoN-W:t CAllLJlD ,!',(;,J*"* NO.: 1-Q.\J\.IJQN.;)., TASK NAME: _MP.JM...ilil~l.:..t',l __ \.::Du\Tli':iN_ __ ___ NO.: ____ _ TASK OBJECTIVE:

m 1::tJ<",111<£ lWLAJYb ;5lY\t, oE:.N:,, flli.-JYl!\IN .l;;.,QV\~\L_

NATURE OF TASK: Continuous .-=c./ __ _ Discrete _____ _ BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS P,,oud-~'< d\ d-,rec\.--,,:_ INITIATING CUES: U,N~10-Jo.<-"->.o""J U,/o'l' .. .c ... +<c,\\f.\. l,L\ o_c -:rv-b8'l ~J* 1' \., k!Li "~ *-~*.**')' .,\ TERMINATING CUES:~~u..v,11...1. (!_',Je,,\,~

• <..ci.v V\\'\.....

REMARKS: 1 Verb System/ / CompDMnl / Pa,am-.. /**N*I / UnllU !1/1k1b1hl Comment* k~H ! Subsy1tem Direction Range Rate ;g '3 ~av,.i-hw ,::.c..sl mA '81~ st""' ~e.V\. ~I I'\ TSol<<-it!d ,..{/ \'\ t-!IY\ t-ll~ NI~ N I\"'-\ to..u. \~J 6H N/f\ o< ~,e <.o<\cta.n-\ 'r>~o..\<_ 6\.-o lAIA ~V'I\CUJ'V\

so\a\..cd d~ !.U\J~e\\J.tl\\-

tt'--o"~"I..\ o.c\iOv\~ u.V't\e ~\-,s -\.IL. O'I\ \ \.\ 91.A. bcN \JO..\ \a..'blQ.. for Rt~ (oo\~own, \ j_ 3 I\ * *

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet _-3 _ of PLANT: __ S...:,,c..:v::c_,_R"'""--"--','

11-----UNIT: . J REVIEWER: CE. W \L ~o.J DATE:. __ 1+--/-'-'/S"'-'/L...>? ...... -5:..__ __ _ I I (e P-3-oo)' ERG NAME: b\Al\!~ &eoll'O ~e¥ckv \UJ\-.!i0\ NO~: E -STEP NAME:c\\u!.ll, 1111111'\ .sm.m1. uu, 1:,,ourno1o-1 4 f>'IPA~ I/A'-"~~**** NO.: 1, (1 ) TASK NAME: tt.i.::U.~ILMMtJ 6fft\1Y1,.lt,1E. lwi.Ann,*-d_6'tf~'l~'-~El> NO.: TASK OBJECTIVE::tt:1 1::s.oWID:..:me 'r,l!.EM, Ml> :ms SDY\ (,:,ib~~ f::rulro_~ NATURE OF TASK: Continuous Discrete ---""'---- BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb Systeml Component Parameter Value/ Unll1I Subsy1tem Range Rate o~~e.K\J(. l'l\.'i. ~I\ th. ; '"' °"' Oo~c\ cJo~e_ " t\ s~\,..-.c.. lwla\i~ ~o..\11es (cf ~d<<\~ bEl'\s) t.\~ v-lo\S*l )01~.e, c. Mdl" P~,-~ov-c.Jo!'e... 1-l}"A. f)~\iW'&.. \tb\a,~~ \J~\~e5 (,f A{t(..~~,S~ ~N~) Ob.eKV"C 11~1-\S* l \Ol!\1 t 1 c. N',i'f\ Q~~hCM cJ o.s.e.. ~\i.-J.. \Jr ii>.. \~\~~CM \J,\~t'~ (.f 0.. ~c\e~ ST1\,\ (.~ws) Ob'::.!W ll"C. Ma.," 6~ \i11a. {)Ds; \.; G'rs l\\)w dose-"1.IA (\'\po.~ \h\11e5 ( cf. '"c.W. stl.'-'=,E.th Proc,J.HA"_J c_,\. ~-* \.v-\\ l INITIATING CUES:~ 691 ..... CoHIQ~I "5 OJ.V"l(..0-... 0 -!-:c1 '!£$f"M~_~\~ TERMINATING CUES: o,a,"' ~~o-\,,...._ i"ol~= lo'-\fc:a'-S. \)o.\'IU of o.~~ 'Srtl\ (:,c;l\ls cic.S.a! REMARKS: t\os\"3 <>f>p\i"s va.\\['('s l\~~o. SIM C::>EN~-Comment, ~r\ IJ/1\ .5"~ r.J '\ :l.. N/A tJ/A 5sec. tl 3 ~"'~\~ do~ \Jr'\ltS N/l"t "1/A-s N 4 ,~~\,c..,\ 'k,i~ ~/A \lf~ ,o~ N I: s --------- I * *

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet_ _ if-_ of / PLANT: __ C:=-----'u"'-~'->...!...:lR~:j~----

UNIT: _ _._\ _4'-,;i_--'--- ERG NAME: ~.i.-.;;:..i. ...... __ .i,;.,,i,;=~=~'-"---=------=-=-.:_:_:;::..;..:: STEP NAME: ..l..!l.!:.l<D....llldll.l.ll._..u.i;.QJ(!!.Jc.l!!t.,.~""'-'-'U!Jl,"-"-~="-=..u.s..~ TASK NAME: _c_r_;_ C. " e,,'{11\M so\ ,o"1., TASK OBJECTIVE: Isal ... :k, J:\...c.. 'br!c:e. K REVIEWER: c;.E ll) \L5-bN DATE: \ I \ lo I B 5" INITIATING CUES: ~1: .. Ge,,,. 't\.,s5 decw,.s*,.~ l.)..V\eoor<oil,,l,~. 01-s{-.., (oe,, f..-~~5 Co.., r'/,t,5 der a HLt rt~ea NATURE OF TASK: Conthiuou8 _____ _ Discrete ____,,v=------- TERMINATING CUES: lt\<M"' stea\M. 1sol1.>.tio ... l-':jf."-S.S vo.\ve.s of ,.,.ffut,d 51"1 Ge>>~) do...-J

• REMARKS: BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS / Campononl

/ Po,omelo, I Z h A~h/ J1Z1 1 C f;, 0-.g -,l : .* Verb / Sploml h**~ /.*Wfi I Udl~ " I Comment, (I i1 ,. b ' 'q'

• 0-.s Subsy1tem Direction Range R1t1 l :t ~! I ::: if -.I 5 Po~;"°"' O.o~ uo~e. t-l/A. WA t-111'\ Jo c;ce N to 5" c..\o~ 'tv\5 ~f'I

' v-.\<< CS. ~,\IO-~ \lo..\.1e~ ( J c.\tA s~) b o~~uc. M-5 'N,.~n s~,,~ ?c5~~~ Ua~~ do~e.. 'N/A. N'f\ ll/A 10 'ia. N E, \""'f\iu\ ~t-vi~ lo\ ~c1'>A~6) ' ;

• *
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet 5" of \ /p PLANT: ------~-'-u~R.~8..--1{---------

__) REVIEWER: c..£ ~,L ~o DATE:.~..,_,1/~/-~+-/-KS-~~~~ ERG NAME: E,,u.LTfl> ,:mt.ro ~"'ER~::IO'So ,w1...11.noN STEP NAME: C\\H)C, '" llN:1 . ::.h ,~ tUIT £(>,v\\.r'"I:!3) (Er-3.oo~ NO.: e-c!).. NO.: & ( TASK NAME: NO.: ____ _ TASK OBJECTIVE:

ig DEThl?.Mili6" 11?: AN'l sma 6EN \~ NOT EP,.UL-ret:)

NATURE OF TASK: Continuous _____ _ Verb Systeml Subsyatem Component Parameter ~e.';::./~ o&ls

• Sf'l\.\ 6~i'J~ Ptt.:::.cu'fe..

(,u; \eo.~\ ~) Discrete--"'---- BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Value/ Range ' Unltal Rete S\-u.'ok!/ 0-IOOO f SI~ ,~~,, "j O -\ODO 9 !> I <r -P,oucl..-oJI o,.,,,~.,...._ INITIATING CUES:~.ratl~ .).a.<.>.10..0; "'.I VoN\CAY.\-v:,\la~l .1 . Q:C.,ST!'#,~1 ~\c.~~~(>~d. TERMINATING CUES: .:S1'lv' ¥"N.s. c.k.ta. REMARKS:* fl*, 6o \o lo.CA-Q. \ .J .1.. Comment* 50 ll/f).. WA V E'. ,l Qlt-1,f":tJ Ii.I .1.-\o,'a i,('\CJUI~~* ~t(\f 'i\..-.... _"\nt D'f" °':t'"c.. ""1°v.<<\'\d. \,"e,. \\ ~t..) r--.......,...,.. &'rt. A-eUIU.~\ C.OV\ \'r o\ \Q.1.-., h'I ) e::1.. .* r~e..SS1A.f'~ ~~lo.._, .... tu. ... ,.*ho""" '?o;.,+-

• *
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) h Sheet ___ of J Ip PLANT: __ c~-)~u~fs~Y-'--+------

UNIT: _\L.._1---"--"?,.:,,.___ REVIEWER: U v:-'l I L~C> ~,._ b' DATE:_-=1+/.i-:f <..~(f-=B::....:,S'------ ERG NAME: £ev.<-n;:t;> .'.;m:Am ¥r:Ult tflJ>C.. \;,oLA:D o rJ STEP NAME: \tll:.r,JT \(:'/ fAU.\. rep ~,,)(~,) TASK NAME: -~'M::C¥-61NI, btN PP.e.~ TASK OBJECTIVE:

ro I::e;fEllM1tJ'E.

IE I\N'f .s!]\/', ~!c::rJ 1s; (£?-3-oo) NO.: E -&_ NO.: -3 (,3} NO.: ____ _ PAULisJ) NATURE OF TASK: Continuous _____ _ Discrete _V:::::~--- Verb Systemt Subsystem Component Parameter BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Valuet Range Unll1t Rate 0 -\oO ?~1~ -Pro.:ci~o.s> ~<-'1 INITIATING CUES:-V...V\(..DV'-\-.,o\\-ed m.\l:,l;tJ .:l..ii~o.-.a. IU l.i.'l'i'-<-f~ ~l d. ~1)1.\ bf:N TERMINATING CUES:~o.1-ia-... ~*-~Mo.cl... REMARKS:'61*.<,o -t. ~!.\.-. -~ PJ\a,AA.t.AAJ. cl~* I~ ( ~) Comments 5 0 }'J/F\ "'" * 'f £ l. d,. ~&t i\ SO.,.~ 2.o 14/A. N/A Y el. I: ~I.A.~ I.O &i.<!.Nla~ i ,, \Ml'\ (..CY\ \v-o l \ O..t;) \ '-I . ?~s dcic..-e.*

., .. _'1' oe~tA ... o ,e ... .... ~~<+-. (Cl.. c1c. , { '\ ~nu. i.. <..-...f" \el..., ~rel 'rc-~!I' .J.. I oo p~

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) PLANT: ------:=S;:_v.;::._,__B,i..:.Rj-=--4-----

UNIT: _.,_\ ERG STEP TASK TASK REVIEWER: <!E \ ;>ij~ ( E ?-3.00) NO.: f:-~ NO.: 3 C 3) NO.: ___ _ Q{ ,.kc.k Qf'!X' ':IC,\\l'eru

• Sheet_ . 7 . of I Ip 'o...o'.L

-., \ /.,\) \ DATE:_.....:l+/ ......,.1 t,..<-4/-"S"-"S-'----- NATURE OF TASK: Conthiuou$ _____ _ Discrete-------"---- REMARKS: t , u*--~' -u, ...... u.h E 1.*. C:,io .\o '1tU,I<-111'3.lN'"taA,v,...~--=--...- Vert, System/ Subsy1t1m Component Q\?~~-f\~ P,~,~ ~d p{~ ~he.~ i 'J\~~D Parameter st.f .... 5,.f,.,f .. s BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS ~o.,..,.\~A r~a Veluel R1ng1 O -/000 0-1000 a-zoo Unite/ R1t1 ?!II~ r~*<r" ffO N/f\ tJ/1\ N Ei a s-o N/l't ~" rJ E. 3 _._ ____ __._ ___ ...__ __ _,_ ___ ..__..___J.__. __ *--* . ... . s, 1e-u&." ( s~ s-) Comment, oraxekv '",~a.hi\~ 'o~ol_

• De~re~~ of' sG"' hdow 5/f'f f.,,,,f Of fi'a..:, * -SROA~ '"'~~"'
• *
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet_8......__ot/'2 PLANT: __ ......::S,::___:::cu_,_R~~.c.....----

UNIT: _ _.___\ REVIEWER: l&)\ L. So t-J DATE:.~-'-ll/__._/i-'-+/-=8_f" __ _ (EP-.3*a0 ERG NAME: £A\.J..LJD) Sre::Aoo 9f.N t.&&w,, bm. "'QC~ NO.: f; -.;;... STEP NAME: \M\..bIF fe,..u.~ '§.~!~) NO.: 1 '4) TASK NAME: ,~OLb:Jia kAIALJ');"X) SrM <x-Ns. NO.:-----TASK OBJECTIVE:

10 ml\')(1V\'\,:1E s:..oou:::.o'"N d'.PM!,,L,=N

.,.,Ni) fY\11:11001'\£ P,<;.,$, WQLDmu'-IJ AN\) MPl:t:> 3 f;N';A.b'i P,Hli:A:~~--------- NATURE OF TASK: Continuous______ Discrete ---'IL.---- REMARKS: BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb System/ Component Parameter Unite/ Comment* Subsyatem Rate I C..\o~ f'W F~w._k () .:b \ * .\-i"""' u"'~J C!Ao !IC.. N/A ,..,~ ~" 2S'~ !'I d\ 1 ho\'~\.i °"' \Jo.\"u (.~c."~ O'o~-,e... ~vJ ~,uA...,.-,....~ R,&*l \.i""' \,~~ cJo6.e.-N/~ Wjt\ ll/f\ '2) tJ ""1-..3 \~\, v\ \J01 :~1 * ,~,a.~a-... \Jo.\,,c5 (rc'1 s) 3 l\o~ f: w i:w ho\ ~OS~~c,v.. (iOCJ~ dose.. H/ft N/A *5" "3 4 3 ~c.b \Jo\<<s N/r.. '5e..c.. ~aAue s. (ro~ ~w f-~ \!O\ ?o::. *," !J\1\-l\()',.,<< J. do!.e.. ~/14. ~p., !-ll\'\ 4 S' w f s ~\;~\ ~*;"' l \la.\ \IC::, se.c. 0 C\o~ Fw \so\ \bsi\;~ Clci~J UOS'(.. N/1\ N/1'\ ~/l't ~r\ G, 5 ofW'~ cl.wp-..~ \lo.,\IJ'e. s p.A-HS.O"t-.~ h\oc.L dP...._ -Jo.\l.lES \oc.a\~'1 . (. Ob~~ ~"" ~o !>t,. N 'A ~A ,.J " ~J)\ N 1-\ 'i '-\ \ .\JV/ I ~-,. ,~,1 -----

• **
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet -*-J__ of J.__(o __ PLANT:* __ ....,,S""---=u_._S.:....iBL...l.j--+-----

UNIT: ____.l._1--'---'--~-* __ REVIEWER: _C*=---=w~,....::~=D~>-J ___ DATE: _ ___,_1+1-.,_\ 1.,~l-=B'-S"-. __ _ (E ?-3.00) ERG NAME: ~a.ult~6 st('A\/1\ Ge\'ll"r,~t-01.- I:,o\,.T,ovi.. NO.: E -.:)._ INITIATING CUES: st~ 6'eV\. '7t"eS5 decteh~*~ UY\Co,,fT"oll~t-1., STEP NAME: :r:: ~ohte.. :fo. .... \ tt>d SG(,:;) NO.: .l\ l4) <!.oV'l*l-;,,, .. t'J. or 'i>t'" GL..,_ en..,,'\'\ef,.'J de f'"'!,Su..-11r.J -' TASK NAME: Iso\1>-\<- Fa. ... \t .. d. 5G~) NO.:-----TERMINATING CUES: °'Fll.w.lted SG(S) 1sa(a.teJ. TASK OBJECTIVE: M.a..x1n1n.e. C.Oo!dowvi. V!'f1'.b*,L*f.1

• ,.. .. J tv\n,1\'W\.-ze.

Res ~!down 'b.vtd M..r.t55 c,f 1:nfY'~"r ~elose.-. NATURE OF TASK: Continuous DiscYete v' REMARKS: BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb Systeml Component Perameter Value/ Unltal Comment* Subsystem Range Rale :J-c.\o5e.. f,.f'N Pos,\.; °"' (\o.se~ e,lo:!>e.. \414' \1(1\ tllA J.5 N 8 if ~',::IN !loec.. \so\a\i°"' \J~\"~ Ob;e,, \Te. /\~"" ~~"" ~\~QY\ t\o~d c..,\05,.~ NIA tJIA ~s N \3 q ,~\iu\.\J~,-~ " \~\"'-~"" \Jo..\~ q C.\t)~ /\fiW '""'"" {)os.,'T'\ON o~J do.s~ ,.qA ~" NII\ Z* rJ 10 II N\w..~ dou... I ,~,~O'I\ 5<<. \1~'1'ts "'~'"'-\() ~\J:.. Mw ~"'1 Q,~\'T\O t-l C.\ou~ cJo~e.. \~\,u\-~v,~ "" 1-llA \lll\ .:2.S"sct.. N 13 \\ \so\~°"" \Jc,..\'I(. ,, C~o.u. Af'.W t\{.."'1 P°'5,~ 1IV\ (l~tl CL!o.se.. "11 Vil ~II\ ' ttll\ !"II\ tJ \;J.. IWL/t.T\orJ ~(Mv,:.& \o d0\.1-\J/a.L\IE' Cl' ~oi .n\"e~ \ol.c)\~. ,i. 0Pf:ier\JC. f\f-'N \~L ~t>J.IJ E '-'~c.. N. v\ ' tJ \'., \ ~~..:,\ \-o c,, 1 I

• *
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet / 0 of I le PLANT:_. _ ____,,,~""->

U=-.,.,R,~_._,R..____;'-f-/ -___ UNIT: _L{.~ ) REVIEWER: C.~ l,J.)IC..SOA..)

• -DATE: 1/J,'4,/85" ____ _ . (f p-3.00) ERG NAME: (AViL:IU>

Sl%Aro e;,.Q.Jµ:t~TP'?, 1:,0'-Auo,.J NO.: E-& . INITIATING CUES: so\-"" 6e11 f.-cess J ... c.,ol.S1~j. 1-l.,.~,,t,.1 10 b_S STEP NAME: l:,c, ArE'"~ M.H-.;n;D NO.: -4 (4) Ct,.,f;,,.,,.J m-SfM6e... <:..o-v1~+,1_y def,~!>!,u,,.l'J.. TASK NAME:....+/-s~\"'l-i: 0..\.(.lt*-tc[ sefc~ NO.: TERMINATING CUES: rl..~1-hJ 5GC$) Isol.._t~ TASK OBJECTIVE: M.z:t..'J<.\IM\l,..~ (;oQ\dow"'- Vip"-b, l1fv ~\'ld M1"'1ro 12.~ 5<c..5 Coo1cl~nJY1cL Mi:..~s of (ner,:_:f relel:!-.se. REMARKS: NATURE OF TASK: Contlnuou~ Discrete _..&L __ _ BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb System/ Component Parameter Value/ Unll1/ Comment, Subsystem Range Rat* 113 C.LD5* MS /HS Sil:MJI. Sl.).~P L Pen:, 1 Tl o CLOSE[) c__\.:,~e,_ N/1\ ~/A )'Ill\ 1', se<:-N 14-15" '\JIU-Vt=~ t0 ~f:,\Nlc \)e.,vel'l l\~w Purnt> i IL\ oe,s~'1*' M~/HS .sro\ I'(\ ~Wt. 'J p~ ,-nor,) (.LOS 61:) <lo!.~ \ ""f \; \ \J VI J, t-111\ tl11' zs-s~ t-1. ,q 15 VN,.\Je;. "Tb TUR.~1~£ 0R\'1'6'N ~IN Pv..Mf \0 C)...OSE; \v\5 /HS ~Tef\m Poi rnorJ l.Laset:> C..,k>!.e,.. 1'{1~ )',!J~ u* "' JG, 17 Man\Ao\\'\ (\~ ~P~L.'i s~c. '(,tr\.\le.'. '10 TU..,P..~\ Nt: DR\1/'E"'N I\Pw ~fi\P J,, ! '. '. I I ; ' I j i l,'3 I ' ' ! *

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) PLANT:* __ _,5"""---u"-'-B-'-'R~,f'------

UNIT: _ _,_I ~:( =-/},_,___ J REVIEWER: C.* \.JJ\L~O ,j

• Sheet / / of ---'-/~'2.,___

DATE:_1 l~j_8_5' __ _ (E~-2,oo) . ERG NAME: f ~u. l ted Sieo. W\. e.,-1 e{"" t-~ I"sol11toV1.NO.: INITIATING CUES: $"t"" ~e,,_ ?n:.~s dec.-e.:r, s*,,, 6 u" co.-t..-011.1, '1 STEP NAME: _J:: Solz..fi. f4-u \fpJ SG C;,) NO.: -~-_ __S::_':U_(,'.o .. t,,.,~,,J. O'f ~t-0e" Ccw1.plct~~ aep,-e.s , ... m"d.

• TASK NAME: __;;1 "'.>o \1ite. 'E'ei 1.1,[fed.

S~C;,) NO.: . TERMINATING CUES: fl:'<. .... l t-eJ SG"c;) :r:s_.,1,,_t.-d TASK OBJECTIVE: N\q.x1M1]!'.e. c..ool cb.uY! L,uft\.b1 \. t,, 2> l'.'cl N\.,..,, ________ ___,.__R""'c.'-"<;,,__~..cl_d ow,..,~ p.V-Q. ~~S5 "6f __ NATURE OF TASK: Continuous______ Discrete~ REMARKS: BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb Systeml Component Parameter Value/ Unllal Comments Subsystem Range f11te 0&5tJ].,_\l{; M:s/Hs sm~ .sw,n-, pos1no..-l CJ...o.sE'l> uo.!,e.. ""' Njl'\ },,!\~ 1..5" N 19 \""i\i u\ ~v,-;~ Sa. \JA\.Yi; ,-0 l'\}J(61 N 6 DR.\"EN i'I~ 'l'l ~\},.('(\ C)....05~ l"\5/V\5 ~M PDQnO~ CJ OSEJ> Llo.s~ "11-A NIA. r</'A. N 18 Dpuok . ~l"'-'\JLo '&U.PPL'I )-(JA. 1/AL\Ja "'O ,u:Rt?.1we:: \oc.b\\l.\ cl~ IN DA.\\l'EN 'a\~ \,o..\\le.S

• .,..FvJ Pu.m P o~Q:P.\JE MS/HS Pm 1T'IDJ ~et) Llo .!:IQ. ~.:,u.r?~'I 1'!/v\ tJIY\ 1'1114. VM.}Je; tl> ~IV\ tJ I'\ '--f ~\ \Jt'.N:~ *\UY'lf:>I

~* ~g_\ \Jb--.J ~F-vJ Ill lO zl z-i. z3 1~ .)S * *

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet _ _j_.L_ of / PLANT:* ----=Sc_*_,_J

~-'-'-R._,+I ____ _ 7 REVIEWER: CJ:. IL~() 10 UNIT: _.,_I --"-.:f...::..J. __ _ DATE: 1 / 1 'ej 8 S" (E: p-3. oO) ERG NAME: _:f....L....C..l:l"'-'1_,__h'-"J=---:=-..,...==-'-~-"---' STEP NAME: _ """.,-c-:...eS~o~\ T ASK NAME: NO.: e: -Q:.. INITIATING CUES: StM Gev1 r,*.s~ dH,c."'"'"'~ Uh(',,,,f,..,1[,,b~ NO.: c::qyc.o,,+,:,,weJ or s't .... Ge ... CoM'i'l<!"t*ly de\>re!.SL&.rl"Z<'ci, T ASK OBJECTIVE: _r::!.~~'~'~'---~'l!!.!!~L....!,=-i~~-.Ul-,.....Q-=_.i:.=~~-- B, c. s Cco\dou.M, NO.: . TERMINATING CUES: F1:1..L(.lfed

,G(:.)

T.solzite.J -REMARKS: NATURE OF TASK: Continuous BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Verb System/ Component Parameter Statel Value/ Unltal Comment, Subsystem Direction Range Rate O~ve.. k~/5f1t1 ~ti .Pol<\J s. fo51no1'-l CLC>St~ % l(/'A "' e.Lo=::.(: f.2.0..5 j SfM Gen.. fbR\]:::. fbsrno~ l~ 0 b/o t{/(\ ~A. S"s ~1/e 'C.C-5 / Sim ~rt ttlR\ls ~\\"lu~ 0 % Nlf\ 5 ~&(. "1 ~ID ;;).d. \--f\,c.\- '!(.H ;~ ~5* ~~/st..-,Gu. f>li.<.. ic; Pos,-no N D~ o/o 0 t</1\ \ll~ 5 sec. t-l ,;i.3 M~~\\ c.\o~ Qll.£.a_ \.I I; f..-0;. /sf,., G}r1 . ~-k fbu\T\()~ c.i..c.sEl) ~L-\ l~\, ... ;-\-~Q,*n~ 0 lo ttll\ t,1JI\ 5 ~lo fJ..C.S/sf,:,1 G'ttt Pi>R~s Pu_, ,-no f\J ~o..tN ~.)(,. \J'1.., 0 ro ){IA ijj(\ Nit\ N ',AS ,u.Jf~ <.\o~ o-{ 'o\ ex}_ IP\ 'ffiS o~<.\/e-l<.C5, .. /5fm Gl'VI l-0~'.I 5 fh. me,._) beD oc.a\\l C % \!\I\ \111\. N/'A ts) J. J. \~\,t.i\ ~~v;h_l

• *
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet _ _13 ____ of /(.a_ PLANT:*_ ---'S-.,._"""1.A..._..R..,_(3.~j1----

UNIT: I )-.. ERG STEP 1 Verb .s ""' '.kl 0 b serve. ,) 7 c...\() 5 -e.. ! ,~ C..\o ~e, I .......... System/ Component Subsystem '? c.s/st.,,Gr,., 'B \OUJJo .. , ,,_ ?os,"t",o"'- '\/olves ?,cs/ ~n,, c; ..... 3/o,m:iow>1. <) 05 ,f;on., \/tr Ives Vc.S($+,~Ge"' ~\~w~ow..t\. <? ns, t.o"' -'-f 1t l"e .s \ REVIEWER: C£" WILSO.J DATE:__jJ_L~~---- CE p-.3.00) NO.: E'-;;;;i.. NO.: A ( -4) N0.: __ ~--1'\ IV\, IMI-Z.E!-. BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS i**W I***~* Direction Range / UnHM Rale .. Jose A. Uo.se-NIA NDYd. do_j~ NI t\ c.ll""d. ~05,C.,.. "-\ 11\ INITIATING CUES: 5t~ G'e.11. ?,-ess dec.~1:11..~1~!1.

u. ... c.,~+,..11,b:J o,-Stm Ge"-c.c,....,fl._t-el_y de?r,:.55,.r*>-'~.

TERMINATING CUES: Fll.u.lt..-d SG' C5) :r solz.-t"eJ REMARKS: l *z~t Atl/ !t~l.l 0 u .. . . co tr . . Comment* c1 fl ~. 'tJ I I

• 0-l JJ ill I if ,I tlJr\ N}A '2.0 f'I E do-'7 Sec. 2.0 N ;)..l, :i.s NI~ lll I\ 5<<-~ll\ !IJII'\ rJ/,1. N E d{)S4?, /..uc"~

\ :.)_ * *

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) Sheet I 't of I (o PLANT: __ >>_;;. __ u...:...:RL-'-'Rj4------

UNIT:___._* I _,_4_d-.......,___ REVIEWER: C,e \Q \LS O tsJ DATE: I I l 1p { 8 5' ( E f-3. oo) p, w i:li..J,M-~ J..vv J.:, v<. ERG STEP TASK TASK \ -SOA&eJa..=Lu ~"' UN1u-.,\....ol\o!ol't NAME: re.uL.,:ED ~TFAM 4\h;1££.e.:ID~!>Ol.,I\D O I'.! NO.: E'-~ INITIATING CUES:M 611~:t.6tJ ~1.-l,O., ,1..o_;',~.Q.J,.L'U,,.C'd NAME: C.1\£:Cll. <!~* LEVEL-tw/U,.A"IF:(s.

n-rt-1'1

<.') NO.: .,S (5) * *-*-. -T o NAME: Jr,J\1tJIBIN A-l)J,;-Gl\ll\IE c:,:r: L..EYe;i..... NO.: TERMINATING CUES: <!.ST I~\ -,~d o.~~._,.a,_\.q_-, . * ........ l'i ~O\..UJ:..) l'r\ fl.It a.d..A~o.>1.. OBJECTIVE: -,:0 rft511B.* &~EG\l,f,TI;. ~uc..nou PRC:>S.u.&.e --nr u ----------------....,,...-------+-*------ REMARKS: Continuous _ ___.Z"----- Discrete _______ _ NATURE OF TASK: V*tb W\t:M,hw t\J.~ Systeml Subsy1t*m C.N fl\ f..\N Component C.~T T~~e.,Nt. -bR\\/t'f\l 11.i:1N Pu..rn.P I U~\Nt, ~\\Je:t-l A:~V'J PIA.IMP sv.c..nor..) BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS f\\'.)ovc. Value/ Range ~10 ore~ Unll1I Rat* o/o N(f\ 10 Ne.A. t-J/A ~/Pr; IIJI~ ,~ sec.. Comment, rJ IE d-. rJ 3 Sw;\-&-o..\\~1\.:~,o:h. >,0.,J wll>W\ (!.

2. 3, *

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) PLANT: _s ..... u. ..... B~'=1'-+--*

___ UNIT: _\.,__t-->--=-~--=------ Velb ~k ~-bit-System/ Subsystem A.~ Component t-1..S 'So s.ec.o-,J1.1~ Parameter ~\00-~";~ lu.~is~il ~WN:l'":-1 VW.i.ati~)

• "-\aw\ ste .........

\,,,e.. -t'l)JI.FW ?""'f eleho~ se 'o\o<tJ.lo...,,,,_ I I\-< , Je,-\-c..- 'E ><.h.. ... ~t" ~~\OkL\\\11\'I (Se~ fO.i\,o..\.iCM BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS . ~11\ \,.es;,. .. ~, ........... Se-\-~"'-.+ Value/ Range 'KIi\ "1IA Units/ Aste M~/"...-U.c1/~c. tJ\or/ 'r,..,-\.le, Ice-~It\ *..t1" !"1/1\ " \!fr\ Nii\ "i E. E.1

• Sheet -~'-5'. of l VJ Comments ,._ () CA I .s ,,. .., / /(.., b :J d,2.,,,~ t;.y . Opvo.\w f1.u;' i ~* c.. . o.clhv;~ :,~ ~ow, a-\\ s.M. ~. ~---b IMMPo\o.k~ ,aA,o1i<l\.\ toY s , 1'£\lctke t.-(!. L.ot1M.,t-'--\

f~~OV\ Ei" .. ,~ ;rul,~~ '°'°' J ?)O t -~ '~c)IM ~e,(o1~ I // ~.\-v_~ I.

• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DETAILS (AIRD) PLANT: __ S_u=.....!...>R'"'--'~>...:,,_/

_____ UNIT: _,_J ~-~--REVIEWER: CE. lJJ \ L !:;;: 0 J NAME: (AuLTE1) %::e&m t:\u.lt.Rf\TDR \$(.;Ll\1l0N NAME:c,o IP E-1, 1--0S'a: Of Bl;AC.TOO.. Ol'l,' * * ' --* (EP-3-oo) NO.: c-~ NO.: 3-C1) ERG STEP TASK TASK NAME: 60 JD E -1.. OBJECTIVE:-::ro Di':U'.t opel{()J"O:C NO.: ____ _ -h, eJA.~ owufCio:\. ewAoCl;.,r...a NATURE OF TASK: Verb Sy1leml Subsy1tem Continuous _____ _ Discrete-~--- BEHAVIORAL ELEMENTS Component Perameter tJ

• Sheet _ _____.,\ID"-

of \ le DATE:_-+/ /..L.::Jlo==-1-/.=f?=.::, ___ _ r, Comment* Ei

• *
• B-2 ACTION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS

SUMMARY

(AIRS) EXAMPLES  

• *
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS

SUMMARY

(AIRS) Sheet_+~----

PLANT: __ s_-\.A_"_,.._,'f'-~---s _______ uN,r: 1 ,a. 0R1a1NATOR: ~-E[o1fz. DATE: 31.,.,,/1? 0 REVIEWER: e,7iJ{2-DA'f'.E: W/fS SORT BLOCK REOS TYPE: Acl V lnl1111110 --SYSTEM : AF vi COMPONENT: AF w S,:w i s.oljpgp v~lve<i PARAMETER: Po~:l= °"' REMARKS: V* I I N/lt 5 . c.105'? N/lt 5 clo~. E(A-0.0 13 1'/lt 5 : close closeA E-2. )' /A 7 1. ,c c.JJe c/asec/ ES-o,/ C, rJ}'I ;i_ c~'us-f orn tS-O./ ' /A 5 ?J;u.s-f #,,-c,7'//e

• 5-0-I (, ,J/A 9 c/ose c::.*/cse "7'-j /'C, /I/<"'. t'=S-0,/ I;;;. N/A 17 47efe,1s f-..-~--..... ~---------.

SUMMARY

OF REQUIREMENTS BLOCK VERIFICATION

SUMMARY

BLOCK VALUEIRANGE:_.'il'-11-w..wii.....,.,....,...~ e.. UNITS ..

• ____ .....,. ... ___ _ PRECISION:

AESPONSE TIME:---~--- .... --INDIVIDUAL DETAILS ,,..., ...... N/R Al/"9 ,.J N/lt IV/II N 111/,i ..vi~ N N/11 Al//1 N N/11-A//A N /fl/A-N//1 N 111/1' ,v/lf N DEVICE PASS C1w1111 FAIL

• *
• ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS

SUMMARY

(AIRS) Shee't ..1&J.t:.o;.;;8.._

___ _ PLANT: __ s_~_s ____ UNIT: \ 9'J..* ORIGINATOR: z_ 1 '}e_* REVIEWER:

i). Jj \ s I fz. DATE; = h,/r DATE

--~"'-+-~+

1 ,;;_8_-S-____ _ SORT BLOCK REOS TYPE: Act lnlo V:: SYSTEM : Bf S !COMPONENT: Pf;-z..~ PARAMETER:::~ .... \""'q,:":~ ... [:::::::::: , _:-REMARKS: ... .., lo Veda ........ au~ c-3 :J9 ti/A ,7 "onilOr Be~ E-3 ..:)(\ NIA. 3 Hon:-bC'" t':>£~ E:?. :J<"-\ NIA. L\ I t-.\ ()(\ I \.or .P.. bol/e_ r--~ 35 N/A, 0 ! A~(us+ c\bo"e. I ES-I.\ ,~ ""' I ! Ob~cve d~ E~..:20\ (:~o) "'~ 4 OCose<1e e,o.al Ff<.-L3 ~IA

• Nor11for 1r\ bane\ -I ,3 7 wrA 5 Obse,cve 8\o(..l\('*..

q ~/,\ \ Ob~rv~ cibcve f'.k.-J3 l'o 1'11~ a Owuve. bdo:..v E'5-JJ Co N/11. \ Mo(\;.\or b.Gt.low 0-3.3 6 tJ1~ ;;;._ Ho(\,* ~or beh-u,ze . s-.s.s fo "1/A ?, f-10.,lh>r 1-:ie~:e'"' -3.~ 6 Nil\ y 1--,\o,*,,\-c,r Ab<> v-<.

SUMMARY

OF REQUIREMENTS BLOCK VALUEIRANGE:_.;:;o ... -_9,,___5 ___ _ UNITS* 0 (q PRECISION:

---

'/~0 RESPONSE TIME: ft (A INDIVIDUAL DETAILS Valuel UnHII ...... .... VERIFICATION

SUMMARY

BLOCK DEVICE PASS PANEL Colnnlenl* (1s) a...J5o o/o y r---. L3C2.J' cyo ~' ad'1e.rse. C::on -\-ci, "n ,e, d 5o ~nJ(;s O/o y [roo] z I \ ** " 75 % y (oO o;Q I\ ' \ H 80 0/o "I 95 0/u \ I I\ \\ tS 0/c:., '"' ._./o .. 1\ t!:>/o N L{O -roo 01o 'I \5 o/o 'I 30 % ror ad'-'erse. C01k,<Hrent 80 0/a N C,o I\ I\ \ I 15 . c,/o l'J ,:,U .. \ ' . . II 15 e>/o y 3() " \ I (I ,, I 5~a ... d 50 % y \ ' 11, 3U u 5o anJ(1s °"/u y <ou ,. \\ I\ ,, ,s 01~ () ,, , , I< FAIL

• *
• S,iee-r 7L ACTION-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS

SUMMARY

(AIRS) PLANT: ___ s .... J¢..lS:~c 

.. yr..:P~S _______ UNIT: t t 6. ORIGINATOR: 1--\. n-al"'lchc:z.' REVIEWER:

p. ?, I fi \ tk SORT ILOCIC REOS nPE: Acl 1111* v' SYSTEM :_ .. Q __ c. _______ _ COMPONENT:

Bfrf Seal \49'=-6t'¢ PARAMETER: f Ip w ; IIEMARKS: C, :I ...., ...... t=b\*l.1 ~s t(/11\ ECA-1.\ ;;.o t-(/ft belo~ l:CA-3.3 35 ti/ft ~L bc2,.lo'4.I ES-'32 IQ. ij/1\ 1 ~"2 I 6:2.(ow E3-3,3 tJ.. tt/~ :i ~~<Ve \es;;.U,aA fS-3.I 10 ... ,I\ 2. IY'lon~~r be.\ow ES-(.:1., ~q N{A '2-OhseN~ b£foc..v

SUMMARY

OF REQUIREMENTS BLOCK VERIFICATION

SUMMARY

BLOCK DEVICE PASS 1.D. No PANEL F,:2..-'2. -1..si./ S A.CS/ Qc;P YALU8RANGE~:--C?~*.2.,.... ______ ___ u*Nns* §."ti * ,RECISION: 15, ii\ e) PM. RESPONSE TIM ... E:._.C'..,(A ..... ___ _ t:R-1-251f1'3,. Qr<1'i<c.P INDIVIDUAL DETAILS c, ...... o.~ ~pM o.'2.. y y* }(o Sectl(-o"'-\'{~111A ~ee.o.,.cL.u- -\-,~~"" 1 sc.o-l<<l , \o .... t not -&4,. reC#rder-it ~--1 f. o."2 '3Ptv\ y o. "2. s~'V,. y o.2 y 0.2 '2)P*'h '/ D,2. sr~n 'j FA'L ')(. )l

• APPENDIX C SCENARIOS FOR VALIDATION WALK-THROUGHS
• C-1
• *
• SCENARIOS FOR VALIDATION WALK-THROUGHS This appendix describes scenarios employed in the EOP walk-throughs for the validation of control room functions.

Each scenario describes the assumptions aboutplant conditions and the procedures that were involved in the scenario.

• Scenario 1 Scenario:

Auto voltage regulator failure on main generator caused by over excitation causing generator trip followed by reactor trip *. Simulator Malfunction No.: MEL 190 Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-1.01 Reactor Trip Recovery Safety Functions Challenged: Heat sink, subcritically, RCS inventory Scenario 2 Scenario: Tube rupture in one steam generator. eves charging flow off scale high. Simulator Malfunction No.: MPS 810 Procedure Used in Scenario: EP-4.00 Steam Generator Tube Rupture Safety Functions Challenged: RCS inventory, heat sink Scenario 3 Scenario: Reactor coolant system leak into containment, 350 gpm (LOCA). Simulator Malfunction No.: PS 3030 Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-2.0ff Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant EP-2.01 SI Termination EP-2.02 Post LOCA Cooldown and Depressurization EP-2.03 Transfer to Cold Leg Recirculation EP-2.04 Transfer to Hot Leg Recirculation ~,-* Safety Functions Challenged: Containment integrity, core cooling, RCS inventory, RCS pressure Scenario 4 Scenario: Inadequate core cooling caused by total loss of all feedwater with ATWS. Simulator Malfunction No.: Custom Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-LOO Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-2.00 Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant ECA-1.00 Loss of all AC Power FRP-H.1 Response to Loss of Secondary Heat Sink FRP-C.1 Response to Inadequate Core .Cooling FRP-S.1 Response to _Nuclear Power Generator/ATWS Safety Functions Challenged: Heat sink, core cooling Scenario 5 Scenario: Tube rupture in one steam generator.

• Simulator Malfunction No.: MPS 810
• Procedures Used _in Scenario:

EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-4.00 Steam Generator Tube' Rupture EP-4.01 Post-SGTR Cooldown using Backfill EP-4.02 Post-SGTR Cooldown using Blowdown EP-4.03 Post-SGTR Cooldown using Steam Dump Safety Functions Challenged: RCS inve*ntory, heat sink Scenario 6 Scenario Natural circulation cooldown. Simulator Malfunction No.: Custom Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.02A Natural Circulation Cooldown Safety Function Challenged: Core cooling

• Scenario 7 Scenario:

Large break LOCA (double ended sheer). Containment spray locked out. Simulator Malfunction No.: Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-2.00 Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant FRP-Z.1 Response to High Containment Pressure Safety Functions Challenged: RCS inventory, core cooling, containment integrity, RCS pressure Scenario 8 Scenario: ATWS followed by loss of off-site power. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection FRP-S.1 Response to Nuclear Power Generation/ATWS

• Safety Functions Challenged:

Subcritically, RCS integrity

• Scenario 9 Scenario:

Steam generators A and B tubes failed simultaneously with 100 gpm and 50 gpm leak, respectively. Steam generator C tubes failed five minutes later with 100 gpm leak. Simulator Malfunction No.: MPS 810 Procedures Used in Scenario: EP-1.00 Reactor Trip/Safety Injection EP-4.00 Steam Generator Tube Rupture Safety Functions Challenged: RCS inventory, heat sink Scenario 10 Scenario Natural circulation cooldown with void in head, no RVLIS. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through

• * ** Procedure Used in Scenario:

EP-1.02C Natural Circulation Cooldown with Void in Rx Vessel (without RVLIS) Safety Function Challenged: Core cooling Scenario 11 Scenario: Natural circulation cooldown with RVLIS. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: EP-1.02B Natural Circulation Cooldown. with Void in Rx Vessel (with RVLIS) Safety Function Challenged: Core cooling Scenario 12 Scenario: Faulted steam generator isolation. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: EP-3.00 Faulted Steam *aenerator Isolation Safety Function Challenged: Secondary integrity Scenario 13 Scenario: Degraded core cooling. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: FRP-C.2 Response to Degraded Core Cooling Safety Functions Challenged: Core cooling Scenario 14 Scenario: Steam generator overpressure. Steam generator pressure greater than 1135 psig. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: FRP-H.2 Response to Steam Generator Overpressure

• • • • '.
• Safety Function Challenged:

Secondary integrity Scenario 15 Scenario: Loss of core shutdown. Intermediate range flux greater than 1 E-10 amps. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walle-through Procedure Used in Scenario: 1 FRP-S.2 Response to Loss of Core Shutdown Safety Function Challenged: Subcriticality Scenario 16 Scenario: Steam generator narrow range level greater than 75%. Simulator Malfunction No.: Walk-through Procedure Used in Scenario: FRP-H.3 Response to Steam Generator High Level Safety Function Challenged: Heat sink ,.~

• ct1:0NTROL -ROOM DESIGN REVIEW FINAL

SUMMARY

REPORT* VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Surry Power Station * . Volume 2

• APPENDIX D HEDREPORTS D-1
• ttMlN ENSirEERINS DISCRB>At£Y REPORT SURRY lMIT I CODEC 13/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28111111 CCJfTRCl.

ROll AMBIENT LI6HTIN6 TOO VARIABLE .,_. ERROR: JIELAY/ERROR IN RESPCJ6ES, POSSIBLE EOOIPIENT IIRFIICTION Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: ENS _ III-8 BRIGHT Ll6HTIN6 C'.AUSES GLARE, DURING BULB REPl.ACEMENT DIRT AND DEBRIS Fiu.s ON* C£WTROL BOA RDS, SOME AREAS DARK 8710 PARAGRAPH NU!IIB£R: 6.1.5. 7.A.2 SUS6ESTED BACl{FIT: PERFORM LI6HTIN6 STUDY, REVISE LI6HTIN6 TO MEET ttlREG-0710

• • • DISPOSITION:

PERFORM LIGHTING STUDY TO ID .9.Jt..B/REFLECTOR OR<<S, OTIER c:tAEES TO LI6HT FIXT _ URES. REFER TO DS-11 l~>. -*~-:::~ DATA CXUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE ttJIBER: TP-1. 1 WORKSPACE SURVEY RE~S: PI-12 CR !MID LTN6 DIFFUS Pfi.S Fil.SE CEIUE

• LOCATION COMPOrENT NAfilE ff NlT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 13/15/86 i L_
• HED NO HUAAN £N61NEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT0 CODEC TITLE . ~TROL AWi HAS COLD AREAS ERROR: ( DELAY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPOOSE /* fff PRCJBLEIII DESCRIPTION:

CONTROL ROOil COLD AREAS, FLI.CTUATIN6 TEll'ERATURE 1700 PARAGRAPH NlJll!BER: 6.1. 5. l, B 6. 1. 5. 2. B SUS6ESiED BACKFIT: 02/27/86 ASSESSrENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY SiA,JS DATE ENS III-9 07/ll/B: INSTALL ADJUSTABLE BAFFLES OVER AIR DUCTING, AD,IINISTRATIVELY CONTRDL_THERMOSTAT SETTINGS fff DISPOSITION: INVESTIGATE INSTALLATION OF BAFFLES TO REDUCE DRAFTS. DATA CCUECTICN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUNBER: TP-1. 4 HVAC SURVEY RBIARKS: PI-28 I IDIS INVOI. VED: lllRK NJIBER

• LOCATION CCJIIIPOrENT NA.IIE SYST£JI! SUBSYSTEl'I

---

---

VENTILATION ff r<<JT IN INV FILE* *

• ti.A EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPA1£Y REPORT SURRY ~IT I CODEC 13/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ---------------*--------

---

20000003 IJlERATIOE NOT VERIFIED UNDER EJIERSENCY LIBHTll'E ERROR: ERROR OR DELAY IN !PERATOR RE~S **4 PRCJBl.811 DESCRIPTION:

ENS III-8 CO.OR DIFFERENTIATIOO LWSURE IN EJIIER LI6HTIN6 CONDITIONS, CR OPERATI~ DIFFICULT IN EJIIER LISHT1"1i 8780 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.1.5.3.H SU66£STED .BACKFIT: VERiFYIDOCt.JIENT CR OPERATOR RESPONSES LWDER EJIIERSOCY LI9fTIN6 CONDITIONS

• • 4 DISPOSITION:

REFER TO DS-10 120000009).

• -tt'* ... DATA CO..LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUMBER: TP-l, 5 ILLUIHNATION SURVEY RalARKS: PI-31. EVALUATE OPERATIONS UNDER EJIIER L1SHTIN6 CONDITIONS ITEAS INVOLVED: LOCATION COl!PO"eiT SYSTEM 01ER LISHTN6 H t<<JT IN INV FILE t

• SUBSYSTEJII 13/15/86
• HlJIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UN IT9 CODE A 02/27/86 ASSESS~NT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE AMBIENT NOISE TOO HISH IN CR. ERROR: JIIAY CAUSE CIJlilltJNICATION ERRORS/INABILITY TO DETECT AUDITORY SIGNALS. CAUSES CPERATOR FATJ6l£/STRESS.

fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION: ENG II -S AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL TOO HI6H IN CR. INiIBITS COlftJNICATION. OPERATORS COll>L.AIN,OF HEADACHE s. 17'10 PARAGRAPH M.IPIBER: 6.1.5.5.C 6.1.5.5.D SUGGESTED BACl<FIT: LJIIIIT ACCESS TO CR ON DAY SHIFT. DISTRIBUTE LOWER POWERED SPŽE:RS STRATESICALLY. ADJUST A LAR!II IORNS fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO DS-1?. (20000011)

• t**,* . DATA ro..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.MBER: TP-1.6 AIIIBIENT NOISE SURVEY RalARKS: PI-33 I IDIS INVOL YED: JIIARK NJIIBER LOCATION ~NT NAfllE SYSTEJI! SUBSYSTEfll

~~~~----------------- AIIIB t()ISE ff NOT IN INV FILE t

• 07/11/85 HlM EN6INEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY .UNIT8 CODE 02./27/86 ASSE~T LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~TRLCTION ACTIVITIES NOT REGLlATED IN CR TO ~TRIX. NOISE IUA4 ERROR: ERROR OR ~y IN DETECTING URIIIS AUDIBLE SISNAI..S m PROBL9I DESCRIPTION:

~T LOOD t()ISE ACTIVITES ICONSTRLCTION/~INT~> IN CR DURING DAY SHIFT. IPERATORS aN<<JT H EAR fff * ---* ':'*...._ 1780 PARAGRAPH tUIBER: 6.1.5.5.D SUOO£STED BACl<FIT: SDEDUlE HI6H-NJISE MINT~ ACTIVITIES FOR LOW OPERATIONS PERIODS DISPOSITION: f() ACTION. ADPIIN CONTROL IN PU~E TO DISTRIBUTE HI6H-N0ISE ACTIVITIES ACROSS SHI FTS. INVESTIGATE t<<JISE SOURCES

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJJIIBER:

TP-1.6 AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-34. ADflIN PR<X:: SS HAS CONTROL OVER ACTIVITIES. ITBIS INVCl.VED: NARK NJIBER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAfllE SYSTEfll -SUBSYST91 81/07/85 ------------- IDNSTRLCTICIN flAINT8"a ., ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 EN61NEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT

• SURRY llHT0 COD£ C HED NO TITLE 20000006 ~TR(l. RCO! IDl>ERATURE AND KJIIIDITY. ERROR: ~YANCE/DISCOIFORT.

REDUC£D coraNTRATION. IEl(JRY l..i>AIRPIE NT. fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION: 02./27/86 ASSESSf!IENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS III-9 05/17/85 DRY BtlB TEJIIPERATURE IS t<<JT 11AINTAH£D WITHIN THE SHADEDAREA !DFORT ZONE OF EXHIBIT. 0708 PARASRAPH NlJIBER: 6.1.5.1,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: DETEA,IINE DESIRABLE TEl'IPERATURE, AND ENSURE TEIIPERATURE _REJIAINS CONST~T. fff DISPOSITION: RERER TO PI-28 (20000002).

• -DATA Cll..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl!IBER:

TP-1.4 HYAC SURVEY IEIARl<S: _ DS-1 !Tats I NVCl. VED: IIARI< NJIIIBER LOCATION COllflCJ£NT CR AIR H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1

• SYSTElll SUBSYSTEIII
• HED t(I EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY R£Pi.in, SURRY UNIT0 CODEC TITLE 2N00007 f()TlCEABI..E VENTILATION DRAUGHT. HllAI ERROR: IP£RATOR ANNlYArCE/DI9rof=ORT.

REDOCES/IMPAIRS CPERATOR COIC ENTRATION. . tH PAOBl..01 DESCRIPTION: 02./27/86. ASSESS111£NT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE III-9 85/17/85 THE VENTILATION OUTLET PROOOC£5 A r(JTICEABLE DRll.lSHT IN THE AREA *raR THE. RAD JO AND NIS MELS. 1780 PARAGRAPH ttllmtR: 6.1.5.2.B SU66ESTED ~IT: PROVIDE FOR A KIRE DIFFUSED/INDIRECT AIR SUPPLY. tH DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-28 <21000002>. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE l'<<JIIIBER: TP-1.4 HVAC SURVEY RalARKS: DS-2 ITEJIIS ItMlL \JED: ~RI< NJIIIBER LOCATION C0MP0r£NT NAIIIE SYSTE!t! CR VENTIL

• ff f()T IN INV FILE t
• SUBSYSTEM
• EN6INEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02./27/86 SURRY UNIT@ CODE C ASSESSlllENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ABt()M. COHROL flOOII ILLIJIINATI~

LEVELS It.A ERROR: READINS/WRITI~ ERRORS. Hf PROBt.EJ! DESCRIPTI~: I ENG III-8 I BBS ISECT 1-1, H!l l.EVELS EXCEED. SECTS 1-1, 1-2, 2-1, 2-2 Le.ER. CO!PUTER CON.SOLE AREA E XCEEDS. 1780 PARAGRAPH NU!raER: 6.1.5, 3.A SU66ESTED BAD<FlT: INCREASE LEVELS t£AR FI RE PROT, AVT Del PNLS, FRONT VERT CB, DECREASE LEVELS OF BBS. Hf DISPOSITION: PERFORP! LI6tffIN6 STIIDY TO IDENTIFY BULB CAA\!SES, REFLECTOR c~s OR OTHER CHA N6ES TO LIGHT FIXTURES. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIBER: TP-1.5 ILLI.JIHNATION SURVEY ~Rl<S: DS-9 IT01S INVll.VED: ~RI< N.MBER LOCATION COIIIPOrENT NAPIE ABf()R CR LVL. CR NORIA.. LT ff t(JT IN INV FILE t ff t(JT IN INV FILE 1 svsru SUBSYSTEJII 05/08/85

• ltJIIIAN ENSINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 13/17/86
• SURRY LWIT I CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE* RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---

ENS HMlN ERROR: AEADIN6 ERRRORS. EYESTRAIN/FATISUE.

lff PAOBl.01 DESCRIPTION: LISTED ITOO !LARE: PROBL91S DURIFE tOrEMERGENCY CNOR!IIIL) AMBIENT Ll6HTIN6. 17e0 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.1.5.3.F SL66EST;D BACKFIT: II -6 USE LOWER INTENSITY BULBS W/ Lill DISCOIIFORT aARE RAiINGS. PROVIDE DIFFUSED/INDIRECT LIGHT ING. VISORS/SHIELDS

• . Ht DISPOSITION:

PERFORJII STUDY TO IMPROVE L1SHTIN6 AND IMPLENENT STUDY RECOflllENDATIOIE. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION iwD CODE NlMBER: TP-1. 5 ILLIJIINATION SURVEY AEIIIARKS: DS-10 ITEIE INVOLVED: C lflR-6 TURB C MTR-RAD~ C&v.t-BBS C&YIH6 NO l C&VPl-£6 NO 2 CIR lflRS-BBS CIR *ITRS-NIS CIRC ll!TRS ~TERS-BBS CQIJER5-ro,p HlRZ lflR-BBS LEGD PBS-BBS L6ND LTS-BBS SS CR PROCED *STEEL ON BBS TR-RAD MON LOCATION CCM>ONENT NAME: ff NOT IN INV FILE t H r<<:JT IN INV FILE t ff r()T IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t H r<<:JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV _FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM 13/17/86 HED NO: 20080809 IT01S INVll.. VED: . ~RK tU!BfR V MTR-INT ST VIHOR REC VM-91 6N 3-2 'JIii-VENT PNL WHISTE D1SP -~-* BEINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT !llRRY ~IT e LOCATION aw>oNENT NA1E H NlT IN INV FILE

• ff t<<:IT IN INV FILE f ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<:IT IN INV FILE 1 ff P<<JT IN INV FILE f SYSTEM 83/17/86 SUBSYSTEM HI.NIN EN6INEERIIE DISCREPlKY REPORT L*. SURRY ~IT0 CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28NN18 ~TRCL RCDI M:KGRWND r<<JISE IKlfURS VERBAL C091UNir.ATION.

ttM ERROR: IIIIPAIRED VOICE COMJNICATIONS. DELAYED IP RESPCNlE. IP FATIG l£/iN(IY~. REDOCED cn<<:ENTRATION. .fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION: ENG II -5 AT SOI£ SPEA<ER-t.ISTENER DISTAfCES. ~)JSE LYI.S Hiai Et46H TO IMPAIR COft.lNIC AT t<<IRJII/SL16 HTLY RAISED VOICE LVLS 8780 PARAGRAPH MJIIIBER: 6.1.5.5.A SUOOESTED IW<FIT: REDlCE IKKSRO.JND r<<JISE LEVELS AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE VERBAL COMUNICATI~ IS t<<JT IMPAIRED fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO DS-12 (281000811) SIN:E IT IS l()RE SPECIFIC * .* -DATA CCl.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE t<<.Jl!!BER: . TP-i.6 AfilBIENT NOISE SURVEY REJIIARKSt DS-11 IIDIS INVCl. VED: IIARK NMBER LOCATION COll>()PENT NAl'IE IIAIN CR ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t SVSTEJII SUBSVSTE!II 07/11/85 ~-ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 9.JRRY um e CODE A 83/17/86 ASSEss,.ENT LAST REVIEW HED t() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20000011 ABt()RAAI.. CD4TROL RID BACKGRCUID NOISE LEVELS. ENG II -5 ltM ERROR: IIIPAIRED COlfl.JNICATI~. OP DISC()!IFQRT /FATISUE. HJ PROBLEI! DESCRIPTION: f(JISE LVL EXCEED 6SDB(A) IN NY AREAS OF CR. COffRIB1.JTIN6 SOURCES: PRINTERS, RCRDRS, VENT IL, PtOES, ETC 1780 PA~Rl¥>H ftJIIIBER: 6.1.s.s.B SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: Isa.ATE/R£IX.ICE f()ISES AS tt:CESSARY: USE SCKMl ABSORBING MATERIALS, SOONDPROOF ENCLOSURES 0 N EQUIP., LIMER PA VOL, ETC. fft DISPOSITION: IMP!.91£NT SU66ESTED BAO<FITS ATTACHED PAGE. 83/17/86 *-DATA CTUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE !OBER: TP-1,6 ~!ENT NOISE SURVEY R91ARKS: DS-12 IIDIS INVCL VED: LOCATION mPONENT NAIIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ~IN CR ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 *

• tlJIIIAH EtEINEERINS DISCREPAICY REPORT 82.127/8,6
• SURRY ~1T0 CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2'00e812 BACK6ROOND NOISE IN CR TOO HIGH. II -5 KJIAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJ> RESP!)EE, H* PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION:

r()lSE TOO HISH DUE TO t<<:IIM. OPERATION CF VENT SYS, 6AITIOUCS SYS 1U1, SIM>. LVL FLW CTRI.R RELAY OflTTER. 1710 PARAGRAPH NJIBER: 6,1,5.5.A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: INVESTIGATE WAYS TO PIUFFLE VENT SYS. PROVIDE MINTEt-8C£0N 6AITRONICS. ADJUST RELAYS TO RE Ill.CE "CHATTER" *** DISPOSITION: REFER TO DS-1?. (28000011). DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION i:wD CODE UBER: TP-1. 6 AIIIBIENT NOISE SURVEY RalARKS: PI-36 , ITEMS INVOI.. VED: MRI< MJIIIBER LOCATION CCJ,llOrENT NA.tlE FLD CNT RI.AV 5"P LYL RLAY VENT SYS \INT SYS DIIPR ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t SYSTEl'I SUBSYST91 87/11/85

• EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAACV REPORT SURRY ~IT0 CODE C TITLE ~13 CR IDIPERATURE IS TOO CW> IN WINTER AND FLLCTUATES DURING SHIFTS. ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

lff PROBL9! DESCRIPTIOO

e2/27/86 ASSESS/JIENT RESPONSIBILITY STATUS III-9 CR TOO COLD IN WINTER. OPS IEAR JACKETS liiILE l<<JRKIN6, PERS ADJUST Tl£RMOSTAT CAUSINS FLOC MTIOO DURlrE SHIFTS. 1780 PARAGRAPH tOIBER: 6.1.5,1.A SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: ADfHNISTRATIVELY C()(TRCl. SETTINS OF TEJIIPERATURE. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-28 (20000002)

• DATA ro.t.ECTIOO DESCRIPTl();

AND CODE NIJIIBER: TP-1,4 HVAC SURVEY R91ARKS: PI-29 IIDIS INW.. VED: MRK ftMBER LOCS!TI(); cnro£NT SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEl'I CR TEfJI H f(]T IN ItN FIL£ t

• UlST REVIEW I DATE U/11/85
• *
• ID.AN OOINEERINS DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY ~IT I CODE C 13/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20000014 ANBIENT LISHTitE VARIES SI6NIFICANTLY IN CR, l'<<JTICABLE St.ARE. ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

"* P~ DESCRIPTION: III-8 AREAS CJ= CR OVERLY BRIGHT, AREAS t()T ILLUll!INATED ENO.JSH.APPEARS TO BE A SISNIFI~ PROBLE Iii WITH 61..ARE. 1780 PARAGRAPH M.JMBER: 6.1. 5. 3. D 6.1.5. 3.E 6.-1. 5. 3.F 9JSSESTED BAD<FIT: PERFORPI LI6HTIN6 STUDY TO DETERMINE SPECIFIC CORRECTION ACTIONS. CORRECT AS REUUIR£D. "* DISPOSITION: REFER TO DS-10 (20000009). DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-1. 5 ILLI.JIIIINATION SURVEY REIIIARKS: PI-30. ITE"6 INVOLVED: l'IARK NI.Jfl'.BER LOCATION ~T NAPIE SYSTEM SUBSYSIDI CR.Afi!B LI6HT ff NH IN INV FILE t 83/17/86

• It.A aEHEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~m, CODE C 02/27/86 ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN81S A.IR.E SPACE LNWAIL IN CR FOR STORAGE IF EXPENDABLES/SPARE PTS/TOO IUAI ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJ) RESPONSE.

"* PRCB..91 DESCRIPTI[)j: r<<JD III-9 ItWlfGUATE STORAGE SPACE FOR EXPNDIUS/SPARE PTS/TOOLS. EXPNDILS/SPARE PTS NJT CLEARLY YIS llti/lllARKED, <RBIARKSJ 87Nl PARAGmi OBER: 6, 1, 1, 5. D 6.1, 1. 5. E 6. S. 4.1. E 6. S. 4.1. F SU66ESTED ~IT: PROV AIIRE FOR STORAGE. LABEL DRAWERS/BINS/CONTAH£RS. PROVIDE REF INDEX LIST FOR RE PlACEIENT INSTRlJIII/EGIP "* DISPOSITI[)I: REFER TO PI-38 (20008109}

• DATA ClUECTJ[)j DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NJIBER: TP-1.7 NAINTAirfU!ILITY SURVEY IIEMRl<S: PJ-40 ITOO INYCl.VED: IIIARK NJIIB£R LOCATION COlllOJ£NT NlE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII STORAGE SPCE H rt:IT IN INY FILE 1 88/U/85

• ErEINEERHE DISCREPANCY REPORT
• SURRY t.NIT9 CODE HED I'(} TITLE ZN90192 t<<) HIGH STcn..s OR CflIRS AVAILABLE IN ~TRO.. ROOII 11M ERROR: DELAY ~/OR ERROR IN CPE:RATOR RESP!HlES Hf PROBLEJII DESCRIPTI!l;:

02./27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE CCJ!PLT 91/97/85 DURING STARTUP, STINIIN3 FOR SEVERAL HOURS AT ONE BOARD CSllSES EXTRaE ~RATOR FATIGUE 9700 PARAGRAPH r<<NER: 6.1.1. 3. c. 2 SU36ESTED BA()(FIT: SUPPLY CONTROL ROOII WITH HIGH STOOLS/CtiHRS. Hf DISPOSITION: CORRECTED, t£!,1 CHAIRS PURC!mD AND IN P\..OC£

• DATA CO-LECTI!l; DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJll!BER:

TP-1, l li0RKSPAC£ SURVEY REMARKS: PI-3

• IT91S INVCl. VED: ~RK IOIBER LOCATION COfPl'.IPENT NA,!£ SYSTEJII STOOLS ff NH IN INV FILE f
• SUBSYSTEJII
• TITLE OOINEERHE DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY ~m, CODE C 2NN183 STORAGE FOR PROCEDURES I~TE 11M ER~R: DELAY OR ERl[)R IN PERFORMirE PROCEDURES Hf PROBL9! DESCRIPTION:

Hf FILE ~/B00<St£LVES INA0£UTE FOR PROCEDURE STORAGE 17N PARAGRMi NtJIIIIER: 6.1.2. 6 SU66ESTED IW)(FIT: INCREASE AVAILABLE AREA, ADD FILES/BO!J<St£1..VES AS REQUIRED DISPOSITION: ~/27/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPCleIBILITY STATUS DATE III-9 16/0&/85 REFER TO E-35 C20A0-4203l. U PROCS REil IIIIIO ~TIONS SHW...D BE STORED IN .CR. 0Tt£RS IN TUELY fAtER. CR!IIRKSJ DATA co.J.ECTION DESCRIPTION CODE NJll!BER: TP-1. 1 .<<JRKSPACE SURVEY REMRl<S: PI-7, EP,AP,FRP,ECA,FCA,ARP STORED IN CR. OTHERS IN ANNEX, IT91S INVrA. 'JED: MRI< NJIIBER LOCATION CCJllOr£NT tillE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM ST~ ~IT ff NJT IN INV FILE t

• e2/27/86 /. ... ltM EN6INEERitE DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY lime CODE C . ASSESSP1£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 2.NN114 r<<I IIKJVEAa.E CART FOR USE AT CCWTRCl. IOlRD ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN Cll£RATOR RESPIMIES ff§ PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION:

III-9 [l)ERATORS NJ ll£RE TO P'Lll PROCEDURES lf£N PEIIFORMIN6 TESTIN3/TASK SEll£taS AT COO RCl. IOlRD ff§ ** 1710 PARAGRAPH tOIBe:R: 6.1.2.6 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE MJVEAaE CARTS FOR SOi ~IT DISPOSITION: REFER TO Pllffl PROCESS IDRJTER lP6RADE TD PROVIDE ADEQUATE l()RKSPACE PER PI-91 (28188381 l

• DATA CW.ECTION DESCRIPTION~

CODE N.IPIBER: TP-1. 1 l()RKSPACE SURVEY AEMRKS: PI-8 IIDIS INVCl. lJED: NARK rulBER LOCATION COMPOf£NT . SUBSYSTEfll CART ff NlT IN INV FILE t

• 81/38/86

.-iJ~T 02./27/86 SURRY ~IT0 CODE ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW t£D I() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2N801i5 DESKS/ccrGX.ES lJ<<:CIIFORTABLE, ~IRS BRO<EN It.NW ERROR: IIAY DELAY OR ERROR IN RESPOOES Ill.(' TO STRESS OR FATIS lE fff PRO!UJII DESCRIPTI~: llJ!PI..T DESKS/CllSl.£5 ARE TOO LOW FOR Cl)IIFORTAIU SEATING, ~IRS BRCl<EN AND I() LDr<<R ADJUSTABLE FOR 1£I6HT. 8788 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: fi, 1,2. 7.C SU66ESTED ~IT: IIIIPROV£ LES/FOOT CLEARANCES AT DESKS~ CONSOLES, REPLACE/REPAIR BRO<EN FURNITURE fff DISPOSITION: f£W ADJUSTAIU ~IRS SH(llJ) iu.EVIATE PROB W/ RO DESK. NEW Cl'IPTR CONSOLE WIU. B E CCIEIDERED IN P-258 lJISRADE *

• DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTI(l.l CODE PUIBER: TP-1, 1 liORKSPACE SURVEY REMRKS: PI-10 ITEMS I NVCl. VED: IIARK l'OIBER LOCATION CO!flOtENT ADJUST CHAIR R0 1 S COOL£ II0 1 S DESK ** ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1 ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1 ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1 svsru SUBSYST01 01/07/85
• tf..R E"6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ll4IT8 CODE TITLE 2NN186 INADE~TE PER&m.. STORAGE FACILITIES FOR CR PERSCN£L lt.R ERROR: LACK OF STDRASE FACILITIES ADDS TO a.UTTER IN CR, IIAY C$llSE ERRORS OR !RAYS IN CJ'ERATOR RESPCJEES fff PROW DESCRIPTION:

RESPONSIBILITY I() SUITAIU, SECURE STORAGE FOR PERSOrA. BEL1NiIN6S OF CR PERS(JfEL 1710 PARAGRAPH NllmER: . 6.1.5.6.A 6.1.5.6.B Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: DETERMHE SIZE/TYPE OF LOCKERS REOOIRED PROVIDE DISPOSITION: DELETE-DPS IGl KlVE STRORAS£ LOCKERS IN CR ~NEX AREA. SHOULD lilVE ADDED SPACE A FTER IUMIN BUl6 lPGRADE

• DATA ctUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE FOBER: TP-1, 1 liiORKSPACE SURVEY REIIARKS:

PI-11 IIDIS INVO..VED: t2./27/S6 ASSEss.ENT LAST REVIEW STATUS DATE CQIIIPI..T 17/11/85 IIARK ltMBER LOCATI~ lnmENT NAP'.£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII COOT ROO<S ~T l<<l<S LOCKERS ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 83/17/86 *-EtEINEERING DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT SURRY I.J4IT e CODE C *

• ASSESSPIENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28000187 FLOOR COVERING DOES NOT IUEVIATE FATISLE CF STANDING ERROR: IIAY CAUSE DELAY/ERRORS IN RESPONSE DUE TO FATISUE CF STANDIN 6 FOR LONS PERIODS OF TIME. fff PROBLEfll DESCRIPTION:

NOD III-9 CR CARPETING TOO THIN/t(J PADDING DlJSING FATIGUE. CARPET 61..LE PERJIIAtENT, CAtffJT CLEAN/MAIN TAIN. 8700 PARAGRAPH ttJNBER: 6.1.S. 7.A.5 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IHSTALL PADDING, NEW CARP£TIN6, ENSURE EASY CLEANP/IIAINTENAtCE. _PROVIDE HIGH STCO..S/D4lIR

s. fff DISPOSITI~:

NEW CARPET WITH PADDING WILL BE INSTALLED

• DATA co..LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-1, 1 WORKSPACE SURVEY RalARKS: PI-13 IIDIS INVOL. VED: LOCATION llJIIJIONENT SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CARPET H t(JT IN INV FILE t 13/17/86

• It.A OOINEERIN8 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ltme CODE 02./27/S6 ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW l£D N) TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN188 lMRESTRICTED ACCESS TO RESTRCXM6/KITD£N NlT AVAILABLE TO IJlERATOR ti.A ERROR: . ERROR/DELAY IN RESPCJEE\

IEERAL Cl)RISICIN, AND REDOCED ATIE NTIC~ TO JOB DUTIES, POSSIBLE J(m DISSATISFACTI~ fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: co.PL.T CR O?S 00 NJT lN..llilITED ACCESS TO FACILITIES, 1mCt£N INADEOOOTE, CARD DOOR TO RESTR!II , t£ED 4TH [I) ON BKSHT tH

• 1780 PARAGRAPH tUIBER: 6.1.5.7.B 6.1.5.7.C SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:

!()YE CARD DOOR PAST FACILITIES, IJlGRADE KITCHEN, PROVIDEADEQUATE RELIEF CPERATORS ON BACK SHIFT DISPOSITIQtil: IIESTR,11 W/ PRESENT '""HE Mir()R lN!DNENIENCE. r() COO<IM3 ALLCMED IN ICR, f:WY OT t£R WAY I~ISTENT W/ 8 HR DAY DATA co..l£CTION DESCRIPTION fWD CODE N.JMBER: TP-1. 1

• ICRl<SPACE SURVEY 119W,\RKS:

PI-1~ ITEJIIS UMl. ',{I): fARI< NMBER LOCATIQtil C(Jl)(Jf£NT NA!£ KIT0£N RESTRCKM

• ff ffJT IN UN FILE t ff r<<JT IN Irtv FILE t SYST91 SUBSYSTEM 11/17/85
• ENS1NEER1tt3 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNITS CODE C t2./27/S6 ASSESSIJIENT LAST REVIEW HED f(l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tNIB189 INADEDUATE SUPPLY CF EXPENDAll.ES/SPARE PARTS IN CR. tl.R ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR REWEE ~~TO EOO IPIENT DI£ TD CF USE CF WIDS PAPER/SlJlPI..IES.

fff PROSLflll DESCRIPTION: NOD 111-9 !UlPI.. Y CF EXPENDABLES/SPARE PARTS NH IIJNITOAED/STOO<ED. STORERW! CI.OSED DURING BAD< SHIF TS. 1780 PARAGRAPH N.MBER: 6. I, 1,5,A 6.1.1.5.B 6.1. I.S.F SU66ESTED BOCl<FIT: ~INISTRATIVE Cl){TROL OVER STCJREROOIII SIJIPLIES. ASSISN RESPONSIBILITY OF INVENTORY TO 198 ER CF STAFF. fff DISPOSITION: STUDY FEASABIUTY CF *IRE STORAGE, Il'IPROVE ADfilIN CONTROL DATA CCLLECTION DESCRIPTION lr4D CODE UBER: TP-1.7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY . REMRl<S: PI-38. REVIEW AFTER lP6RAD£ (S£E ILSO PI-4e 20800015) IIDIS INVO.. VED: flARK N.MB£R LOCATION CQIIJ)()ENT tM: CHART PAPER IN< PADS Hf< PENS LIGHT BU.BS r()TE PRINTER PfilR RCDR REPAIRS SPCL TOO.S ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff f(IT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff f(IT IN INV FILE t H f(IT IN INV FILE t ff l'()T IN INV FILE t SYSTEII SUBSYSTa, 11/07/85 *

• ENGINEERING DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY lJHT0 CODE C 82/27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t(J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN118 TID.S FOR IIEPUICIN6 EXPENDABLES/SPARE PARTS t(JT AVAIL.ABLE IN CR. K.NW ERIIJR: IIAY PERSIIA. INJURY TO CJ>ERATORS AND DAliA,£ TO EQUIPIE NT DlE TO IPERATOR RESPONSE ERRORS. tff PROBLal DESCRIPTll*:

III-9 IIECESSARY REPAIR TO!X.S IHIVAILAIU IN CR, OPERATORS USE IA<ESHIFT TOOLS. SfJETIIES UT WA IT FOR SKJ~ TO FIX 1710 PARASRM-i fOIBER: 6.1.1.5.C 6.3.3.l.C,2 6.3.3.l.C.3 SU66£STED BACKFIT: PROVIDE ILL NECESSARY TOOLS IN ~TITIES r£CESSARY FOR OPERATION/REPAIR. tff DISPOSITION: PROVIDE TOO..S AND IMPLEMENT ADfilI

N. PROCEDURE

TO IIRINTAININVENTORY

• DATA cw.ECTIDN DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-1.7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY REMARKS: PI-39. AE-EWLUATE lflER UP6RADE ITEJIIS INYCLUED:

IIARK IUIBER L~TION COflJOr£NT PAE Jlll.B EXTRTRS CARD PlllERS LENS WROCHS SCREWDIVERS

• ff f()T IN INV FILE* H t(JT IN INV FILE* ff t(JT IN INV FILE
• ff r<<JT IN INV FILE* SYSTEJII SUBSYSIDI 88/87/85
• K.A ENSINEERirE DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY ~IT0 CO~ 62./27/86 ASSESSPIENT LAST REVIEW l£D I'll TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2'lee0116 l<<l 1¥:CESS TO BEIEIR. REFEREra ~TERill. IN llHT 2. ti.A ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

/ fff PROfLEII DESCRIPTI~: C(Nlt_T &aERAL REFEREr<<::£ IIIATERill. IS NlT AVAILABU:.TO lMIT 2 IP£RATIIE PERSOfEL (STORED IN IJ4IT l Ol.Yl. fff

• 1788 PARAGRAPH NJIIER: 6.1,2.6 !l.166ESTED

~FIT: ADD SETS c.= REF ~/DOCIIIENTS COlill'ION TO BOTH UNITS, STORE IN U-2 OR RELOCATE STORA 6E SO f()TH ACCESS DISPOSITION: llfLETE-ffATERill.S l'IJT APPROPRIATE FOR STORAGE IN CR -IO..lD INCREASE REQUIRDIENTS OF IOrESSENTill. PERSCNEL DATA ClllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE. UBER: TP-1, 1 .<<lRKSPACE SURVEY REIIIARKS: PI-9 ITEJIIS lfMl. VEih IIIAIIK N.NER LOCATION cc>>POr£NT SYSTEJll SUBSYSTE/11 STORAGE H t()T IN INV FILE t ** 87/15/85

• tLMlN EN6INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 9JRRY 1.1me roIE I: ASSE:-SliE!*ff LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESP(MiIBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN281 NOT ENOUGH TELEPt0£ INSTRLIENT/JID<S FOR USE IN CR. ERROR: DELAY IN 6IVIrE/RECEIVIN6 EQUIP STATUS I~O. Hf PROa.01 DESCRIPTION:

NOT Eta.J6H TELEPt<<M: JNSTIIIJENTS/J~ AT MAIM .<<IRK STATI!Ni IN CR. uee PARAGRAPH NJIBER: 6.1.1.3.C.2 SOOGESTED BACKFIT: C(MPLT DETERINE t<<J. OF INSTRUM r£EDED BY CR PERSOffL, & l()ST ADVANTAGEOUS POSITIONING CF ADDITIO tH l'fL JID<S: INSTu. . DISPOSITION: DELETE-EMERSOCY RESPONSE I.PGRADE PER rtlREIH696 NlW PROVIDE ADEQUATE a¥1ABILIT IES. DATA CQ.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIBER: TP-1.1 l<<lRl<SPACE SURVEY * ~Rl<S: PI-5 IIDIS INYO.. YED: IIIARt< NJ&:R LOCATION CCMlOfENT NA,£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 97/11/85 J~ TELEPtOES H f()T IN INV FIL£* H t<<JT IN INV FIL£ * *

• l£D r<<J TITLE IOIAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY lime CODE B W82 CJIERATORS QN(JT COIUICATE lffILE WEARING BREATHil'E APPARATUS IUAI ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN CJIERATOR REsmEES **-PROaBI DESCRIPTI~:

V/2127/86 ASSESSf!ENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE II -7 tl/07/85 DIFFIW.T TO COPIIJNICATE/USE Pt0£/6AITRONICS SYSTDI lffILE IEARIN6 BREATHIN3 ~Tl.IS 8788 PARAGRAPH MMBER: 6.1.4.1.s 6.2.1.a.s 6.2.1.a.c SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: PROVIDE RESPIRATORS ŽT FACILITATE COINJNICATIONS

• • -DISPOSITI~:

PROVIDE flASK AlilPLIFIERS

• DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NJIBER: TP-1.3 aER6£NCY EOOIPIENT RENlft(S: PI-26 I TEJIIS I NVCk. VED : MRI< l'Ul8£R LOCATI~ COll>OfENT ,-SYSTEfl SUBSYSTE/11 RESPIRATORS H NJT IN INV FILE t ~*

• ElfiINEERIN6 D1SCR£PAt£Y REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE B t2.127/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -7 KM ERROR: DELAY OR ERIER IN CPERATOR IESP(N;ES lff PROa..91 DESCRIPTION:

6AITRONICS/RADIOS POORLY IIAINTA1'£D, PtO£ SYS FAlLTY, INS!,FFICIENT ~S/~/UNIT s 1710 PARASRMi romER: 6. 2, 1, 8. A !IJ66ESTED BfO<FIT: PROVIDE IIAINTENIN:E CF EGUIP, ItiCREASE r(), OF ~ERS/ DMELS/1.WITS, PROVIDE 18IDSETS lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-42 (eeeN2e5) AND PI-43 (2e800206),

• 11/17/85 I. DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION CODE NlJIBER: TP-1.3 aERSaa EGUIP!IENT REIIARKS:

Pl-27 ITEJIIS IfMl. VED: IIARK MJIIIBER LOC.QTION IDl>OfENT 6AITRONICS ROI TELE SYS IJfV RADIOS ff r()T IN INV FILE f ff r()T IN INV FILE t ff f<<lT IN INV FILE t SYSIDI SUBSVSIDI

• . , .*,, '.
• tlA EN;JNEERIN; DISCREPA'CY REPORT SURRY t.rme CODE B 02./27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 209N2e4 CO'MNTIIIA.

POERED TEI.EPtOE SYSTEJII INADEUTE. 11.R ERROR: IIIAY DELAY/ERRORS IN CPERATOR RESP!J.'SES Dll: TO INABILIT Y TO CIU/RECEI'.{ CIUS. Ht Pfllll.9I DESCRIPTION: II -7 ~R(XH) NlISE/WEAI< SI6'RS IfQJlllt,6 CALLS. l)W'T au WT/SET INSIDE ~s DURING 1£ INY RAI~ lff ** 1710 PARAGRAPH fUIIBER: 6. 2. 1. 1. C. l 6. 2.1.1. C. 2 6. 2.1. 2 6. 2.1. 8. A S006ESTED BACl(FI T: P£RFORII EOOIP. IIIJDIFICATIC*S. IJ)SRADE PLANT/OUTSIDE PUWT SYSTEJII. P£RFORPI PERIODIC IIIAINTEN i:N:E D£0(S. DISPOSITION: SS COOlLE WILL RELIEVE SOE PROBLEIIIS. 8696 COMJNICATIOO LPSRADE PR06f!AIII WILL CORRECT 0Tt£RS

• DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~

AND COD£ NJIIIB*R: TP-2. 1 ~ICATI~ SURVEY TP-1.3 EIERSENCY ~IP1ENT REJIIARKS: PI-41. (SEE PI-5 (280002011, PI-43 (291082061). I TEJIIS I NYfl . .'JED: IIIARI< JUIIQ;R L.OCATI~ fAi:: SYSTEJII SUBSYSIDI AOtJI PtOES ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 81/17/85 ttMlN ENSiteRitE DISCREPIN:Y REPORT f/2./27/86

• • SURRY I.NIT@ CODE B ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESP()CSIBILITY STATUS DATE W85 SCl.NO-POERED TELEPIO£ SYSTEM ItAlEOUATE.

11M ERROR: MY~ DELAY/ERROR IN 1))£RATOR RESPClEE DUE TO INABILITY TO GIVE/RECEIVE Irf=~TION ON PIJM STATUS. fff PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: NOD II -7 J$0<5 ftlT LABa£D. !PS. l.tEURE lf£RE/IG TO US£. APIPI..IFICATION POOR. 1£ADSETS 1.NDFDRTABL E. 1710 PARAGRAPH fOIBER: 6. 2. 1.1. C. 1 6. 2. 1.1. C. 2 6. 2.1. 3 6. 2. 1, 8. A SOOGESTED BACKF IT: PERFORM l<<lDIFICATIONS/UPGRADES TO SYSTEJI. PERFOR11 PERIODICS MINT~ CHEO<S/REPAIRS TO SYSTEM. fff DISPOSITION: ,. POSSIBLY REPL~ 50.ND-PCJERED SYS W/ RADIO SYS. 6AI-T~ICS AIIIPLIFICATIOH ON S P SYS POSSIBLE <IU IA>S). DATA CCIU.ECTION DESCRIPTION IN> CODE ro!BER:

• TP-2. 1 IXMJNICATIOO SURVEY TP-1, 3 EIER6£r£Y EOOIPIENT

~Rl<S: PI-42. RE~UATE WTER FIX. (SEE PI-S (2e000201)), I T9IS I NY!l. llED: MRI< IUIBER LOCATION COl10fENT SYSTEIII SUBSYSIDI ff ftJT IN INV FILE t ** 81/87/85 llllR4 EN:iINEERINi DISCIIEPAfCY REPORT 92./27/86 .* __ *. ) SURRY ~ITI aJDE B ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPl:N,IBILITY STATUS DATE -~* 2IN8286 1W SYSTEJI INADEIUITE. HM ERROR: , MY.al.lSE DELAY/ERRORS lN Cl>ERATOR RESP(H;E FIDI INABILITY T 0 GIVE/RECEIVE UFDR*ITICW ON PUINT STATUS. 1H PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: II -7 DIST~COCRETE/Hl6H fClISE AREAS MKE A.KIES-TAU<IES INEFFECTIJL, POOR IIUNTam:E. INS lFFICIENT t0.STERS. 1781!1 PARAGmt MJIIIBER:

6. 2. 1, 1, C.1 6. 2.1, 1, C. 2 6. 2.1. 4 6. 2.1. 8. A S006ESTED BACl<F IT: PERFORM l<<)J)lFICATIONS/IJl6RADES TO COIIIMICATIONS SYSIDIS. PERFORM PERIODIC .iAINTENAra CHE D(S/REPAIRS.

fH DISPOSITION: 1¥>PENDIX R lPSRADE SHa.l..D aJRRECT PROBt.91. RE~TE AFTER LPGRADE. ' DATA CCU£CTICW DESCRIPTICW CODE IUIBER: TP-2.1 COMJNlCATI!Ni SURVEY TP-1,3 EJIERGENCY ElllIPIENT AEMRKS: PI-43. <SEE PI-44 (28000212), PI-5 (~l)). I TEJ11S I NV()_ \JED: MAK IUIBER LOCATION COflOtENT rM: BASE STATION I.MITS ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t SYSTEJI SUBSYSTEM ., 11/87/85

• ~ ENSil'EERIPE DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT tc./27/86 SURRY LWITI COIE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 281N287 6AITROOICS SYSIDI IPR>EGUATE.

tUIAt>il: II -7 BUZZIN6/STATIC/SGUBl.IN6 ON LINES. CtM.EL CROSSOVER. INSLfFICIENT C>RfaS. SPEAKERS/~ SETS f£ED REPAIR. 1710 PARAGRAPH r<<JIIIBER:

6. 2. 1, 1, C.1 6. 2. 1. 1. C. 2 6. 2.1, 6 6. 2.1. 8. A SlSiESTED BACl<FIT:

PERFORM JIODIFICATIONS/1Jl6RAD£S TO SYSTEM. PERFDRP! PERIODIC 111AINTENANC£/REPAIRS. '** DISPOSITION: I~ROVE ROUTH£ IIIAINT, DETERPIINE CORRECTIVE ACTION TO I.Jl6RAD* RELIABILITY, IF NJ T POSSIBLE mEIDER ~INS SYS ., (* ( DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION CODE N.JUIER: TP-2, 1 COIIJNICATI~ SURVEY TP-1,J aERSENCY EllJIPIENT AalARl(S: PI-45. RE-EWI. fFT CHIES (SEE PI-5(~1>,PI-41(~) ITEJIIS INVCl. m>: *lAK ltMBER LOCATION COflPOfENT NAME SYST91 GAI-TRONICS ff r<<:JT IN INV FIL£ i SUBSYST91 11/87/85

• OOINEERitE DISCREPAN:Y REPORT SURRY lJHTI CODE 621211e6
• ASSEss.ENT LAST REVIEW >£D NO TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 2811188211 NO CXIIUHCATIOO Litt< BETWEEN RESTR(XJI/KIT0£N AREA AND CR. ltR ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJ> flESP(N;E.

fff P110a.91 DESCRIPTION: J() tMl SETS AVAIL FOR OPS TO CO*JNICATE FIOI RESTRIVKITDi TO CR. 6AIT~IC SPt<R USlJUY OJT-<J=-oRDER IN RR/KIT 1718 PARAGRAPH MMSER: 6.1.s. 7.B.3 Sl83ESTED 8'0<FIT: INSTIU IM>SETS IN RESTRIVKITCH. ENSURE 6AITRONICS SPKRMAINTAINED/IN SERVICE, IS MMALY ADJUSTED TO ~T Hf DISPOSITION: 6AIT~ICS AYAIL.ABL£ IN ~X * ** DATA co..L.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE IUIBER: TP-1,l l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY RBIA~S: PI-15 ITEIE INYCl. VED: NARK rtJIBER LOCATION IDl>otENT t9IE SYSTal SUBSYSTEJII SAI-T~ICS HNOT IN INV FILE 1

• 17/15/85
• *
• ltJAj EtfiINEERitE DJSCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY ~JTI CODE B 12/27/86 ASSESSNENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN212 FIXED-BASE lW SYSTal IS J~TE. ttM ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJ) RESP£HlE.

._. PROa..E,I DESCRIPTION: II -7 SYS DESIGN POOR (OW' T SPEM/LISTEN AT SAflE TIME. ) SYS PERFORM-a BAD (IEA</~S), P OOR IIAINTENAf<<:E ON SYS 1710 PA~RM-1 "-"IBER: 6.2, 1, 1,C.1 6.2.1, 1,C,2 6,2,1,5 6.2.1.8,A SUGGESTED BACKFIT: fllDIFY/EttRCE EGUIP TO LP6RADE CR/~T COPKJNICATICIHS TO OCCEPTABLE/EFFECTIVE LEVEL. PER FOIi! PERIODIC IIAINT. '** DISPOSITION: SYSTEJII IS SIIIR.EX -ADEQUATE FOR PURPOSE, REFER TO PI-43 (20N0286l

• DATA tn.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tulBER: TP-2, 1 COMUNICATIONS SURVEY . TP-1, J EIIER6ENCY EGUIPPIENT RaARKS: PI-44 I TEJIIS INVCl. \JED: IIARK rtJIIIER LOCATION COlflOr£NT lff SYSIDI H f(JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEM 87/15/85
• EtEH£ERI1E DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE B ~/27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCJ4SIBILITY STATUS DATE 281NJ81 c:c>>RJTER RESP(JEE SUM. IIIAINIDRa SYSIDI POOR. ttM ERROR: IIWIYS IIIAY AEIIIJ:E Tl£ PROBABILITY IF OP. ~T~, AND, TH EREFORE, USE IF TtE CQIII\JTER SYSTEM. ff-I PAOBl.EM DESCRIPTION:

EN6 II -7 IIESPCN;E TO IN>UT SI.CM. RECEIVE I() REsm.sE DELAY IIESSA6ES, ASSUl£S INPUT WAS l()T ACCEPTED

• LOT IF DOWN TIIIIE. 1718 PARASRMi NJIBER: 6. 7.1. 7.A 6. 7.1. 7.B !l&STED ~IT: PERIODIC IIIAINT~ D£0<S. PROVIDE RESPONSE DELAY IIIESSAGE:

TO CONFIR,I t()RMI.. CQIIRJTER OPE RATI~. -ff-I DISPOSITIClil:

• lP6RADE PROCESS COfll.JTER, IJCLUDE APPROPRIATE DES16N & LOCATION OF DIPTR OP IERKSTATI~

AS A COOSIDERATION. DATA al.LECTIClil DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJIBER: TP-7.1 C()l)UTER SYSIDI REVIEW llEMRl<S: Pl--98 I TEJIIS l l'ft'Cl. VED: IIIARK ltJll£R LOCATION COf>Of£NT NAIi£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEl'I H t()T IN INV FILE t ., 15/28/85

• • Er.SINEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY ~ne CODE B 92./27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW l£D r<<) TITLE RESPOCSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28eee382 CCNIUTER SYST81 PROCEOORES ARE l()T lPDATED. .._. ERROR: MY CAUSE DEIJIY /ERROR IN ())£~TOR RESPCN,£.

fH PROSl.91 DESCRIPTI~: II -7 OR<<S TO n£ COIIRJT£R SYSIDI l()T D00.1£NTED. CXlERATirE PROCEDURES . r<<JT lJlGRADED. NJ USEAB LE INDEX PROVIDED. 1710 PARAS~ IOIBER: 6.7.1.8.A,1 6.7.1.*&.B SU66£STED 8":KFIT: INITIATE ADMIN. ~TID. OYER ll>6RADIFE IF COi'. SYS. PROC. FOR EASY CP£RATOR ,c:ESS TO FIL ES/ ltFORMTI~. '** DISPOSITI~: ASSIGN REPCJSIBILITY FOR MINTAINIFE/LPGRADIN6 COIIIPUTER PROCEDURES

• DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE IUIBER: TP-7.1 COIIJJUTER SYSTEJll REVIEW ~S: PI-91 ITBIS INYCl. VED: MRI< IUIBER LOCATI~ COlflOf£NT tflllE SYSIDI. SUBSYSTa. DIPTR PROCED ff NJT IN INV FILE t 15/28/85

• • ttMN OOINEERIPE DISCREPAtt:Y 1:>-..1-9.JRRY ume CODE '2./27/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW t£D NO TITLE RESPO.{:iLi.LlTY STATUS DATE * -----------------------

---

2NN383 READABILITY IF CRT DISPLAYS t(JT ADEIUlTE.

tUIAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CJ> RESP!MlE, / Hf PROa..91 DESCRIPTI~: J()T ENX.6H CONTRAST B£TWEEN ~RIC ~TERS DISPLAYED AND SCREEN ITSELF. 1798 PARA6Ri¥>H OBER: 6.7.2.1.A SOOGESTED BOO<FIT: ADJUST LIJIINAICE m<TRAST PER 1780 6UID£L.INES.

• • • DISPOSITION:

DELETE -CONTRAST IS ADJUSTABLE TO ADEII.IATE RATIO. J()T ~ROBL.Elil IHEDATl

• DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE OBER: TP-7,1 COMPUTER SYSTEM REVIEW R91ARKS: PI-92 IIDIS INYCL VED: ~RK N.JliER LOCATI~ C(Jll()ENT till£ SYSIDI CRT DISPLAY H t(JT IN INV FILE t SUBSYST91

• CDIIL.T 87/15/85
  • ll.R EhSINEERihS DISC~Y REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE B '2./27/~ ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW l£D r<<J TITLE RESOOIBILITY STATUS DATE 28eN3l4 DATA POINT INDICES ARE I~IUHE FOR Cl>ERATOR USE. II -7 IUA4 ER~R: DELAY /ERROR IN CP RESP(HIE.

REDOCES IJ> If' !DIP UTER SYSIDI, t1-t PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: SPECIFIC CODES/ADDRESSES BY lfiICH DATA DISPS CAN 11£ CALLED IJ) ON CRT BY CPS IUERIC I l()T CROSS-REFERB<<:ED, ...

• 1788 PA~RM-1 NJIBER: 6. 7.1,8,B.1

6. 7, 1,8.B.2 9.166ESTED BAO<FIT: PROVIDE CROSS-REFERaCE INDEX BY SYSIDI/SIJBSYSTEJII AND/ORFLWCTIOfA.

SROlP NAIi£ TO SUPPlElEN T MJIIERIC CODE Irt>EX DISPOSITION: PROVIDE INDEX REFEREtC£D BY SYSIDI/PARAIETER rfl!E. DURINS P-258 lJl6RADE, ADD MEN U INDEX TO SCFTWARE. DATA c:ru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE ftMBER: TP-7,1 CO/IIPUTER SYSIDI REVIEW IIEMRKS: PI-93. HI ERROR PROB FIDI DELAY IN LOCATihS CORRECT ADD f(), ITEMS INYCl. W>: MRK IOIBER LOCATION !nl>OPENT NAIi£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSIDI DATA PT IND ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t

• 95/28/85 EMiHEERl~

Dl&:IIEPIKY REPORT 12./27/86 9.IRRY llHTI aJDE B ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28881385 PRINTER SPEED TOO SLOW AND BLFFER STORAGE INADEOOATE. EN6 II -7 IUIAN ERflOR: ERIOII IN IJl AESP(MiE. MAY LOSS If TRENDltE INFO. Hf PROBt.£1f DESCR I PTI~: PRINTERS ARE TOO SLOW TD KEEP LJl WITH roflUTER OOTPUT. BlfFER STORAGE IS INADEIUlTE. IN='OR MATION IS LOST. fff ** 1710 PARAS~ N.11'.BER:

6. 7. 3.1. D 6. 7. 3.1.E.4 SUBGESTED

~IT: IIEP!XE/fllDIFY PRHTR SPD TO MIN 300 LIPES/IIIIN. Ir<<:REASE BUFFER STD~ TO STORE/TRANSFER A LL IN=O FRQIII COllllJTER. DISPOSITION: IPSRADE ~T IDllUTER SYSTEM Ul'Q.UDIN6 PRINTER>. POTENTIAL TO LOS£ ALARIII IN='OR NATI~ DATA al.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JIIIB£R: TP-7.l COl'PUTER SYSIDI REVIEW REMRl<S1 PI-94 IIDIS INVO.. VED: . NARK MJIIIBER LOCATION COfllOfENT PM: SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEJII CQIIIP PRINTER H t()T IN INV -FILE * ** 15/28/85

• ttM 00INEERIN6 DISCREPA.tCY REPORT 92/27/86 SURRY 11me CODE 8 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28818306 INSTIUTl~

PUITES FOR REL!WlIN6 PRINTER ~R, RI~, Itt< NISSIN IUIAN ERROR: RAY LOSS IF TRENDING Irf='O .DUE TO PRINTER IXllfHI~ IIESIL T IN DELAYS/ERRORS IN IP RESPOEE. fff PROBLEN DESCRIPTION: II -7 PRINTERS AR£ t<<JT PROVIDED WITH INSTRI.CTION PLATES, lfiICHINSTRI.CT !PS ON KIi TO ll£UR) PAPE R, RI BBC1E, IN<. 1788 PARAS~ tOIBER: 6. 7.l. l.E.3 Q.186ESTED BOO<F IT: PROVIDE INSTROCTlON PLATES ON A.L. PRINTER CASINGS. l+f DISPOSITION: NEW C()IRJTER JEW PRINTERS WITH 6REATER STD~ CAPACITY AR£ TO BE INSTIUED PER PHIi (2M8301), (U/30/86 .,: .DATA COl.1.ECTION DESCRIPTION iwD CODE NJIBER: TP-7.1 CCN>UTER SYSIDI REVIEW ~lll<Sr PI-95* IIDIS INYCi. i.tD: flARK JiJMBER LOCATI~ COJOENT rM: INSTR PL.ATE H MJT IN IPN FILE* svsm, SUBSYSTEM

• llMH EtEINEERirE DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY OOIT0 CllDE B 02./27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20180387 PRINTER ~R TAKE-lP SPOOLS ARE flISSil'E.

tt.R ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJ) RESPCHE. (LOSS CF TRENDil'E I~O> lff PRC1!t91 DESCRIPTI~: ENG COf>UTER PRINTERS ARE f(JT PROVIDED WITH TAKE-lP SPOO.S FOR PRINTER PAPER. 9788 PARASRAPH IUIBER: 6. 7. 3.1. E. S SLGSESTED MCl<FIT: II -7 PROVIDE PAPER TAKE-lP SPOO..S FOR AU PRINTERS IN CR WITtil ~ITV AT L.£AST EllA. TO THE F EED SlPPLY. fff DISPOSITI~:

• .) IP6RADE PROCESS COflUTER UIO.UDil'E PRINTER STAND AND TAKE-IJl). (LOOI< AT lillD DON E AT ~. ) REFER TO PI-9a (28008381)
• DATA al.LECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JIIIEIER:

TP-7.1 O)lf)IJTER SYSIDI REVIEW ~Rl<S: Pl-96 ITENS INVCL 'JED: ~AK IUIBER LOCATION IDflOt£NT SYSTEfl !IJBSYSTEJII TAKE-lP SPLS H f()T IN INV FILE t *** 81/30/86

• tlA EN3INEERifE DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNITI CXIDE C 02./27/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW l£D f() TITLE ~IBILITY STATUS DATE 2IN03l8 PRINT ro>Y f<<IT IUESSill.E TO CPERATORS. ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CP RESPOilSE, *ff PROa.al DESCRIPTIOO:

ENS III-9 CPS ~T READ l()ST RECENTLY PRINTED LIIE IF PRINTCIJTS,KIVE PAEVICXJSL.Y COIRAHED ~T PR INTER IS TOO !l.CM. Hf 1710 PARASRMi NJIBER: 6. 7.3,l,F,l !l.166ESTED IW){FIT: ENSURE PRNTR fllAN.ALY ADJUSTED, EllJIP lllDIFIED SO LAST PRINTED LlrE IF ()l)TR CAN BE READ B y CPS. DISPOSITIOO: lllDIFY TO PROVIDE LirEFD FCUOWI~ CARRIA6* RET, LOW PROB Cf ER ROR FD~ Llr£FEED CAPABILTY, REFER TO WIPUTER UPGRADE PER PI-91 12010130 1), DATA cru.ECTIOO DESCRIPTIOO AND CODE ftJIBER: TP-7,1 CDPJTER SYSTal REVIEW PI-97 IIDIS INY!l. VED: ~RK MJlll8£R LOCATI~ COl>OrENT NA1E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM COfl) PRINTER H r()T IN INV FILE f 11/38/86 *

• 11M EN7INE£RIN3 DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE B 82/27/86 ASSESSIENT lAiT REVIEW TITLE RESP0'4SIBILITY STATUS DATE tlR ERROR: IIELAY /ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

IIIAY REDlCE i,£RATOR IUEPTAr<<:E 0 F IDl>UTER SYSTEM. fff PROB1.91 DESCRIPTIC*: ENS II -7 IPS "'T PROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE INDICATION T~T KEYS ONJJIPUTER KEYDmDS BEEN ACM TED. 1718 PARAGRAPH JUIBER: 6. 7, 1,4, F QJ66ESTED BACKF IT: ENSURE KEYS GIVE POSITIVE INDICATION BY SNAP/FEEL/~ISU: Cl.ID< OR RELEASE OF RESISTAfCE T ..iT KEYS ARE ACT~TED, fff DISPOSITI~: IJl6RADE PROCESS COJlUTER SYTEJII -INCLUDil'E KEYBOARDS -PROVIDE CRT FOR INIUT ECH 0, FREllENT ERRORS.

• DATA al.l.ECTION DESCRIPTIC*

AND CODE N.MBER: TP-7,1 COIIIPUTER SYSIDI REVIEW AEIIIARKS: PI-98 ITBIS INYO. VED: IIARK NJIIER LOCATION COIIJOfENT NAIi:: . SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM KE~RDS H NJT IN INV FILE t 85/28/85 tlR DEINEERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT t2.127/86

• SURRY l.WITI lllDE 8 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW t£D NO TITLE RESP(JEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28N8311 CJlERATOR/CCNJUTER INTERF~ IS I~TE. ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN [I) RESP06E. *IY REDOCE CP ~TIM:£ Ir= a>>IP UTER SYSTEI\. tH PAOrL91 DESCRIPTI~:

IPS IIEPORT DIFFICl.tTY INTERF~IrE W/ Ol>TR (DO r()T IN)EASTAND CM>TR DIil.Dill). 8788 PARAGRAPH MIIBER: 6. 7, 1,2.A Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: II -7 PROVIDE INTELLIGIBLE so:1WARE PROOmw. FOR CIIPTR SYSTEJII lt!ICH IUOWS OPS TO ID:£SS DPTR US INS COIO YCICAllll..ARY. tff DISPOSITiir.: IP6RADE: PROCESS CCJIPUTER SYSTEJII -IMPROVE CCJIPUTER Dll(.00!£ TO BE IICRE COIRnIBL E WITH CJlERATOR EXPECTATIONS.

• DATA l:tUECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIBER: TP-7.1 CQIIPJTER SYSTEI! REVIEW REMRKSr PI-99 I IDIS I NYll. '¥EDI ~Ill< ltJER LOCATI~ CCJllOfENT fM: CPI~ Dii:l. H r<<JT IN INV FILE t

• svsru
• S1JBSYST91 85/28/85
• OOHEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/27/86 SURRY ~ITIJ CODE B ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW t£D NO TITLE RESPB¥.l1BILITY STATUS DATE 28080311 URSENT IESSA6ES ON CRT ARE fill HIQI.I9fTED.

IUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPQICSE. (Ill£ TO IIIISSIN6 llJT-<F-TOLERAfCE CDa>ITICIE. l lff PROBl.al DESCRIPTION: ENS II -7 URGENT IESSA6ES CCM:ERHIN6 llJT-oF-TOLERAfa COi>ITIONS r<<JT HIGl.I6HTED ON CRT SCREEN TO A TIMCT ll>S ATTENTION. 1718 PAAASRMi N.NlER: 6.7.2.5.K.1 6.7.2.5.K.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE ADEQUATE HIEH.I8HTIN6 C'JlPABILITIES FOR DISPLAY~ URGENT IESSA6ES ON Tl£ CRT SCREE N. lff DISPOSITION: IP6RADE PUlNT COIPUTER TO HIEH.ISHT CRITIOl. JIESSA6ES

• DATA CfUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIBER:

TP-7.1 COMPUTER SYSTEII REVIEW REMRl<S: PI-118 ITEMS INYCl.'~D: MRK MJIIIBER LOCATION aNlOr£HT NM: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM H f()T IN INV FILE t 85/28/85 *

• ~; EN6INEERirE DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY ~ITI [llllE B te./27/66 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESP!l6IBILITY STATUS DATE 2NN312 IURfll IESSA6ES ON PRINT-WTS NJT DISTifOJIQAU FQ 0Tt£R IESSA6 IUIAN ERROR: .DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPf>>.5£

<CPS IIIAY IUSS INFO ON llJT-oF-Tll.E Mt(:E COO>ITif>>.S. > fH PIila.EM DESCRIPTION: ENS IUIRf! IESSAGES 1)4 PRINT-WTS f(JT READILY DISTirG.JISHAIU FRCJI OTIER IESSASES. 171i UBER: 6. 7.J.2.D S006ESTED BACKFIT: II -6 PROVIDE ADEIUITE HIEH.I6HTIN6 CAPABILITIES ON CMPTR PRINT-OJTS SO T~T CPS CAN DISTINGUISH BETIEEN IESSAGES. fff

• DISPO$ITI1l'4:

lP6RADE CQlflUTER SYSIDI TO PROVIDE PRIORITIZATION AND ~T Of" IXJTPUT. POT ENTill. TO IIISS fLARIIIS, SEE Pl-98 C2'0N381 >

• DATA CClLECTIOH DESCRIPTif>>.

AND CODE M.MBER: TP-7.1 COflUTER SYST91 REVIEW IIEJIU!KS: . PI-181 IT91S llfAL\,{I): WK fOIIER LOCATION COllOfENT tM: SVSIDI SUBSYSTEM ff f(JT IN INV FILE t

• 15/28/85
• ttM ENSINEERIIE DISC~Y REPORT SURRY tMITI CODE B 82/27/&6 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPCJcSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28198313 IESS&S DO JIJT a.EARLY REI.ATE TO Aff<<JCIATOR TILES. ltJ9I ERRORr DELAY /ERROR IN CJ> RESP!HiE.

lff PROll9t D£SCRIPTI[1f: . II -7 IIJRDIM:l (F IU~ IESSASES CII CIJll.'UTER PRINT-ooTS DO NlT ~YS RELATE TO A SPfCIFIC IUIJII NITED fN<<Jf;IATOR TILE Hf 17N PARA6R1¥1H NIIBER: 6. 7.3.2,F. l 6. 7.3.2.F.2 !USESTED IW:KFIT: om;E S(FTWARE TO PROVIDE 6IJRDI1E (F Ufflll IESSA6ES THAT CLEARLY RELATE TO 61lRDifE USED 0 N ANUCIATOR ll.ARIIS. DISPOSITICJ4: ST~RDIZE IESSAGES TO BE EASILY CORRELATED TO IMUCIATORS. LOW CONSEIIJOCE DU E TO CPRTING C00>ITIIJ6 tNERWAY DATA COJ.ECTION DESCRIPTIC* CODE NJIBER: TP-7.1 WIPUTER SYSTBI REVIEW IIEJARKS: PI-112 ITEMS INYO.. IJED: ~RK fUIER I.OCATICJI Q)ll)(Jt£NT '91£ SYSTEJll SUBSYSTEJII ff NJT IN INV FILE t 85/28/85

• tlA Er43INEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY. ~IT@ CODE ~/27/86 ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW 1£1) f() TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21188411 TOO MANY P8JU IN CR DURIN6 SHIFT CHS, START-ti>, & TRANSIENTS tulAN ERROR: corFUSICW IN! f()ISE MY CllJSE DELAY/ERROR IN AESPCMiE fff PR*REII DESCRIPTIIJ'c:

aJIPI..T llJTl(IRIZED aJT IOESSENTI~ PERSOf£1. IN CR DURIJE SHIFTCHS, START-ti> & T~IENTS CAUSIN6 DISTRATHN 1718 PA~ fOIBER: 6.1. l. 7 !IJB6£STED ~IT: INITIATE CONTR(l. OVER ~/IIJV9ENT OF PERSIHEL DURINS ACTIVITY PERIODS, 117/11/85 ...,, DISPOSITIIJ'c: ADflIN PROC IN PUn, CDISIDEA STID6ER ENFOACEIENT, ~SCl.OOI< AT ~INS SI6N/LI6 HT IN INDICATE -ENTRY RESTRICTED, ** DATA au.ECTII* DESCRIPTil>>I CODE NJIBER: TP-1, 1 WRKSPAC£ SURVEY IIEMRKS: PI-6 ITBIS UMl.ml: IWII< fOIIER LOCATil>>I aJllOfENT NAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM H NIT IN INV FIL£ t *

• ltJAI ENGINEERIIE DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY I.WIT& COD£ C 12./27/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW t£D f() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2Ml5il BEA60CY EOOIMNT f()T IN\9TORIED OR IESTOCKED ERROR: DELAYS IN AESPCN>IIE TO CPERATIIYR REOOIR9ENTS IN Tt£ EVEN d T IF A CR LtHttA!lTAll.E IDCDITl(JC Hf PftO!l£M 11£SCRIPTIC*:

III-9 PROTECTIVE Cl.OTHIIE/01ER6 EOOIP NlT AYAil.All.E IN SIZES OR REQJIAED QTYS r££DED, aERSOCY tircJRAl:I: WK ltlWtWIMlt: 17r.!I JJRIH:,'JHIH fl.llUI b, 1, .\, 1, B 6.1, .\, 1. D b.1, .\, .S. R b. 1, .\, .S. B bU:H:l) 11:.D IIU(I-1 I : PRWJKE. lff:.IIJ!~ 1:WIIJ, INI11All:. AIJIIIIN ~IHl.Uj INtH lNYl:NIUMY JNJ IUllUUl:i Hf U1~l Ill,.: 1:.llll:.Hb1:JCY EUU!Pfl:.NI ll:I ._,IM'IDED IN CR~ IS IrM.NTUHlcV IIJNILY 1.11:.K AUfUN l'tt\Ull Utct, 11/31/86 ** UHTA COLLt~llllN lJt!x;RIPTION AND CODE ~MBe:R: TP-1, 3 EIIER6ENCY EGUI Pl'tENT AEIWIKS: PI-22 ITEMS IN'JCl. VED: NAPJ< NU~R LOCATION ~:1fT ~:i!E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

---

... -------------------------------

---

AIR PACKS au KJRNS awEfRLS FACE MASKS &JIVES

• ff J<<IT IN INV FILE t ff t<<>T IN INV FILE 1 ff Nll IN lNV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff f()T IN INV FILE t
• *
• 11M EN3Ir£EAIJE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY lime CODE TITLE RESPONSIBI Ll TY -------~-----

---

2-e~ IPEAATORS L~ PRACTICE IN DONNING CF PROTECTIVE EQUIPIENT HlM ERROR: DELAY IN RESPONDING TO OP£AATlONA

... REGUIR£~~TS DURING OCR U NINHABITAB~t SITUATlCl\ fff PROl!;..=Y. D~::.CRIP": WN: OPERATORS UNSURE OF ABILITY TO PROPE1LY DON PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 07U PARAGRAPH fUIBER: 6.1.4.1.H Sl.iBGESTED BACKFIT: :NC:..UDE PAACiICE. lN DON!\lNG PROTECTIVE EQUIPEl£NT IIURININJRM.. TRAINING EXERCISES ff-f DISPOSITION: OPERATORS ARE RES?ONSIBLE FOR IIIAINTAININS THEIR LEva OFCOMPENTENCV IN THIS AREA DATA co~~ECTION DEscqr~:10~ ft\D CODE M.111:BE~: TP-;.3 E.~ERGENCY EQLlIP~E~; IIDIS IHVO..VE;): ASSESSNFNT Ulil Nt.Vltw ~lAIUS DAit. a>>IPI.T 11/17/85 MAK to1B£R LOCO..,..ION co.,~JC.~\*.- \ri:r..; svsm, SIJBSY!:iltll

• • • • -** ------TRAINING H hOT IN INV FILE 1
• H!:.U N'u IUIIN E~ROR: tfJl'IAN ENGINEERING DISC~Y REPORT blOOO' llf 1 18 aJDE C lllU: DELAYS OR ERRORS IN CPc.ffRIUK ICl:.l:il-ffl:it
• f.4 PROBl..81!

Llt!;il;Kl~IION: E/27/86 ~I Util ICl:.YltW RESPCIEIB1L1 IY tilHIUl:i IIAlt IN!; 111~ 11/11/B:> OPS HAVE DffFlCLllY WUIOUfti 1N JIHUI tWll', l'Nlll WJIHlftil~iBLOVES INHIBIT IIIYEJIENT/S ISHT 9780 PA~RAPH NJl!B£R: 6.1,4, 1,B SUSG£STED BACXFIT: CHEO</VERIFY ~y CF EOOIPIENT ANTHR(J)()JETRY AND DOCIJENT I-If DISPOSITION: l<<lD TO REFER TO TRAINING TO INSURE ADEOUATE INSTRLCTIIJt. ., DATA CCUECTill4 DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIIBER: TP-1,J 9£RSENCY EQUIPIIIENT REJIIARKS: Pl-24 I TOO INY!l. I/ED: RARK NUJIBER LOCATI~ COltPO,,ENT NAME SYSTEM PROT EQUIP H r()T IN INV FIL£ 1

• SUBSYST91
• tl.R ENHNEERitE DISC~ REPORT SURRY IMIT8 CODE 12.127/86 ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------------------

---

BIERGaCY EQUIPIENT IS MJT EASILY/READILY

~SSIBLE. ERROR: CPS COllD INCUR PERSOfA. INJURY DUE TO EXPOSURE TO ~ZARIXXJS ENVIRCNEN'Tll. C(Jt)ITI~ IN EVENT OF AN ~RGaCY. Hf PROBl..9! DESCRIPTION: C(Jl)LT EQUIP l'()T EASILY/R£ADILY 1a£SSIBL£ TO CR OPERATitE PERS(H£L flAtUl. WAY TO !PEN CARDE D OOOR IF DOOR FAILS. 8780 PARAGRAPH tOIBER: 6.1.4.1.6 6.1.4.2.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: EOOIP CR CARDED DOOR WITH MNUA:.. OVERRIDE CAPABILITY. Ht DISPOSITION: DOOR EQUIPPED WITH !'!AN.JAL OPERATED "PANIC BAR"

• DATA COLL.ECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE UBER: TP-l.3 EJllERSS~CY EOOIPPIENT RE~RKS: Pl-25 ITEl'IS INVOLVED: Jl!ARI< NU'1BER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAME FIRE £11UIP OP PROT £OU! RAD EOOIP RESCUE EOOIP

• H N:JT IN INV FIL£ 1 H t<<lT IN INV FILE t H MlT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYST91 17/15/85
• *
• KM OOINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY.REPORT SURRY ~Il1 CODEC 82/27/86*

ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21881183 I.NECESSARY INFORAATION IS DISPLAYED IN CR. ERROR: INCREASES PROBABILITY IF CP ERROR HI PROBIDI DESCRIPTION: III-9 LNECESSARY INFO IS DISPLAYED IN CR TAKIN6 lP Wl.lJUILE ON Prf-5 IWD ADDING TO VISlR.. CLUTIER IF CR, 1790 PARAGRAPH r<<JMBER: 6.S.1.1.C 6.S.1.1.D SUGGESTED BACKFIT: DETERl'IINE r£CESSITY FOR DISPLAY OF INFO LISTED IN CR Rt4DR9IOYE Ufff:CESSARY DISPLAYS. HI DISPOSITION: REJIIOYE ALL LISTED. COORDil'f!TE WITH PI-68-1 (29A03844l, PI-68-3 (2IA83l4Sl, PI-68 -2 (20A03009l, PI-68-4 (~l

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~

CODE N.JP!BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION RE'1ARl<S: PI-107 ITBIS INVOLVED: MRI< NUIIIBER LOCATION COll>Ot£NT ~TAP C/D SW RECCJIIIB H2 LOAD FREQ PN LW EVAP CID ROD POS IND STIii CHLR C/D H NJT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff f()T IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff f(JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEIII !ilBSYSTEJII 82/25/85

• tt.R EPEINEERINB DISCREPANCY REPORT 9.JRRY ~m, CODE A I 82/27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------------------

---

28901114 INDICATION t(JT LABELLED TO REFLECT DEMm OR ~TlR.. STATUS. II -5 tUIAN ERROR: .D£LAY/ERROR IN CP RE~. Hi PROEl.~ DESCRIPTION:

OPS REPORT THAT THEY B£C0E AS TO ~1£R EQUIPREFLECTS DEJIRW OR ~TIA. STATUS. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6. 5. 1, 1. £. l St.OOESTED BACKFIT: LABEL ALL INDICATION LISTED TO REFLECT HTHER OF WIAND OR ~TIA.. STATUS. fff DISPOSITION: PL.NT CONI/N. IS il.L CONTR' .. LRS AR£ DEMAND-~IZ£ IN TRS

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE !'UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REAARl<S:

Pl-i88. I~ INVOLVED: "IRK rtJPIBER LOCATION C011PONENT NAlilE BLOWDOWN DECAY HT REL 1£VS PRZR SPR W RCS SYSTEJII SG FW FLOW STfll DIJPIP

• ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN IrN FILE f SYSTEPI SUBSYSIDI 82/25/85
• *
• tUIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 0 CODE B 13/17/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE -RESPQNSIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------*------------

---

20001106 INDICATill4 NOT LABELLED TO REFLECT DBRID OR ACTIR STATUS. tfM ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

/ Hf PROB1..91 DESCRIPTI!l4: II -6 OPS REPORT THAT THEY BECM COff=USED AS TO HTHER EQUIP REFLECTS DEAD OR ACTUAi.. STATUS. Hf 0700 PARASRAPH NUMBER: f..5.1.1.E.1 Sl.66EST~ BACKFIT: LABEL ALL INDICATION LISTED TO REFLECT WHETHER OF DEMND OR ACru:ll. STATUS. DISPOSITION: LABEL TO INDICATE D8tAND STATUS OF RECORDER

• DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTill4 iwD CODE UBER: TP-9.2 V£RIFICATION w:t.IDATION REAARl<S:

PI-108. IT91 INVll.VED: RCS PRZR PRESSURE~TER RECORDER, I~ INVClVED: LOCATION COfiPONENT SYSTEl'I 11:S PRZR PR ff NOT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM 13/17/86

• HED NO TITLE EN;ItEERirE DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE A ~11"7 INDICATICN NOT LABELLED TO REFLECT DEIAID OR ~TUAI. STATUS. ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN o:> RESPONSE.

ic./27/86 ASSESSIENT UlST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 I -1 ic./25/85 fff PROBL01 DESCRIPTION:

• CPS REPORT THAT THEY BECOIE COf=USED AS TO lliETl£R EOOIPIEHT REFLECTS DEJRa> OR ACTLA. STA TUS. 87il0 PARAGRAPH l'O!BER: 6.S.1.1.E.1 SUGGESTED BACKFIT: LABEL ALL INDICATION LISTED TO REFLECT Wl£Tf£R OF DE*lND OR ACTI.A STATUS, JH DISPOSITION:

ADD RD/SRN LTS CN BB FOR BKR STATUS (ACTIA.l UNDER RPI DATA ro..LECTICN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REAARKS: PI-108 ITEMS INVOLVED: ~RK NUPIBER LOCATICN COIIIPrnENT NAP!£ SYST01 5UBSYST01

---

---

RX TRP l OUT ff NOT IN INV FILE* *

• EtEINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY lime CODE C 12/27/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED f() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------------------

---

2111881283 INSTRlJENTATION f()T LOCATED IN PRii.ARY IPERATIN6 AREA. tl.R ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJI fff PRO~ DESCRIPTION:

ENS IIHI CPS REI} TO LEAVE PRIJIIARY OPER AREA TO ATTEND INSTU l>>I OTl£R PAfELS lfiILE ct)4TINDJSLY I(] NITORIMJ ~TRCl.S. Hf

• 1780 PA~RAPH NJIIIBER:

£.1.1.1.B SUf6ESTED BACKF IT: INVEST16ATE FEASIBILITY CF INSTALLI~ REDUNDANT INDICATION IN PRIMARY IJIER AREA FOR TI<<)S£ FI RE DETEC PAfEL. DISPOSITION: ADD DISP & ~RPI ACl</RESET TO tEW PLA'.IT C(Jl)UTER IN PCR, 'l.SO SEE PI-91 (28M381 ) . DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE N.IMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND 1/ALIDATION REIIIARKS:

• PI-11114 LO E_RR: ANNS IN !'CR, AVAIL 3RD LIC1<< IN CR TO RESP IIDIS INVOLVED:

1!A RK NlJIIIBER LOCATION COlflOt£NT NAfilE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRE DET PNL H r()T IN IJN FILE 1

• 12/25/85
  • OOINEERI"6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT& CODEC 12./27/86 PASE 59 ASS£SSIIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE -------~---------------

---

2800128'5 ctMROLS AND ASSOCIATED DISPLAYS ARE f()T LOCATED~ SA,£ PAIEL, ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CJ> RESPOOSE.

fff PROBIDI DESCRIPTION: RCP FL~ IIITRS LOCATED ()I SECT 2 IF VB & RCP FLCII CTRLS LOCATED CW SECT l IF BB. 0700 PARAGRAPH NLMBER: 6.8.1.1.B Sl.GSESTED BACKFIT: III-9 EVALUATE NECESSITY FOR SROUPINS CONTROLS AND 1£TERS ON TH£ SAIIIE PAr£L, AND RELOCATE IF REQ UIRED. fff DISPOSITION: 11/11/85

• F(J ACTION -RCP FLCII PIETERS ARE CLOSE Erd6H FOR c.,e:RATQRS TTO SE£ IF THERE IS F LOW DURING START UP. I() ACTION. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIIIBER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATI(}4 AND VALIDATION R£lllARKS:

• Pl-119 !TOO INVOLVED:

IJIARK MfflBER LOCATION COPIPONENT SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfl!

---

---

RCP Ai'l~ERS RCP CTR RCP FLOW IND

• ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 IUIAN 00If£ERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY ~IT& CODE B Vlc./2.7186 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPC>>6IBILITY STATUS DATE
• 2812.20 ~ROLS AND ASSOCIATED DISPLAYS ARE t<<JT LOCATED !>>4 SAfE M"EL. tlM ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJ> RE~. Hf PROBl.01 DESCRIPTION:

n -6 RCP TEJIIP£RATUR£ HOT AND co...D INDICATORS LOCATED ON VERTICAL BOARDS, IDf'TROLS ARE LOCATED 0 N ~RDS. 17il0 PARAGRAPH NJIIBER: 6.8.1.1.B SUSGESTED BACKFIT: EVll.UATE NECESSITY FOR 6RruPIN6 CONTROLS AND IETERS ON THE SAME PM!., AND RELOCATED IF RE QUIRED. . Ht DISPOSITION: RCS WR TEMP CTH & TCl WILL BE AVAILABLE ON SPDS CONPUTER

• DATA ClllECTION DESCRIPTION

~D CODE N.JIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ YALIDATION 19ARKS: PI-119 ITEMS INVOLVED: fllARK NUl'IBER LOCATION CD!PCJENT SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM 11/11/85 -----* -----------------------

---

RCP TC CNTRL RCP TC IND RCP TH CNTRL 'RCP TH IND

• ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff MIT IN INV FILE 1 ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff MIT IN INV FILE 1
• ~INEERIN6 DISC~V REPORT 111ITI COD£ B 82./27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE IIESP(JeIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---

. 28901221 CD4TR0LS AND ASSOCIATED DISP'LAYS ARE t<<lT LOCATED~~~.

EN6 II -6 H1J1AN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPCN;E. ... PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: PRZR LVL IND AND PRZR PRESS RCRDRARE LOCATED ON YBS ANDTHEIR ASSOCIATED ~TIIWi AR£ u:r.A TED ON BBS. 1710 PARAGRAPH t(J!llER: 6.8.1.1.B SUSGESTED BACKFIT: EV~~TE rECESSITY FOR 6RO.J>Ir<<3 CONTROLS AND IIETERS ON THE SAfE ~, RELOCATE IF ffEg UIRED. HI DISPOSITION: ADD RCS WR PRESS TO BB-1 RCS SYS 1-3080 PSIG. FOR PRZR LYL SEE PI-19-8 128Y22487 ),

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIB£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REIIIARl<S:

Pl-119 ITEMS INVO.. VED: IIARK MJIIIBER LOCATION CCJIII.OIJraT NAI£ PRZR LVL. CTR PRZR LYL IND PRZR PR CTRL PRZR PR RCRD

• ff MJT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff l'()T IN INV FILE t H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYST91 11/11/85 ltM ENiINEERitE DISCREPArCY REPORT 12.127/86
• SURRY 11ma CODE C ASSESSf£NT LAST REVIEW HED t< RE~. / fff PROB.91 DESCRIPTION:

PRI WTR SUP PPS LOCATED ON DIFFERENT~ T~ ASSOCAITED ~Rel. 8700 PARAGRAPH NI.MBER: 6.8.1.1.B Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: !()VE PI.N)S TO BO~ RECOVERY PANEL Ht DISPOSITION: pt.i,;p SWITCHES TO BE l<<lVED TO 00~ RECOVERY ?ML. SEE PI-19-4 (28.113128)

• DATA CCUECTION DESCR.IPTION AND CODE PDBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VJ:LIDATION , R91ARKS: PI-119 . ITEJIIS INVOL \JED: MRK NU"8ER LOCATION COflPONENT tAIE: 1-PG-P-lA 1-P6-P-1B
• H NlT IN INV FILE t H t(JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM III-9 15/82/85
• It.WW EtfiINEERihS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT8 CODE 12./27/86 A.9SESSflENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28001482 VIEWING PArELS FRCJII SRO/SlJlERVISOR STAT!()., ttJIIIAN ERROR: CA~T SEE FR!Jf SEATED POSIT!()., IP IIAY IIISS INFO FIDI ~FEC TED PAtELS. fft PRO!UJI DESCRIPTION:

mR.T TELE STA BLOCl<IN6 SS VIEW Cf' LOWER PNLS ~IT 1 GEN PNI.S, ~IT 2 RX VEssa PRZR PNL, LHSI P PS RECIRC 1S(l. W. 1 ETC Hf

• 1780 PARAGRAPH

!UBER: 6,1,1,3,A 6,1,2.3.A 6.1.3.1.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE TELEPtDE STATION AND CQIIIPUTER IIONITORS TO OBTAIN LNlBSTRUCTED VIEW Of ~. DISPOSITION: DELETE-5HIFT SUPERVISOR IS r<<JT REQUIRED TO OITOR THE PArEL.S FRI)! A SEATED POSI TION. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE ri.JIIIBER: TP-1. 1 li<<JRKSPACE SURVEY TP-2,1 COIIDIJNICATI~ SURVEY TP-9.2 VER1FICATI()4 AND VALIDATI~ REIIARl<S: C-1 ITEJIIS INVOLVED: MRI< IOBER LOCATION COIIPONENT NAIIIE . SYSTEJII SUBSYST£111 SS CONSOLE H NJT IN INV FILE 1

• 17/11/85
• 11M a6Ir£ERI"3 DISCREPAll:Y REPORT SURRY 1.rme CODE V/2./27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 281413 COl!l.WICATIIWS BE1lEEN STA AND.SHIFT SIJlERVISOR.

..._ ERAOR: COMtdCATicrE WITH !IIIFT SUPERVISOR WILL .Be: DIFFICtLT BECA USE CF UO< CF YISI.A. inm~:T. Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTil>>I: STA KINITORS ARE ll.OCl<IN6 THE STA'S YIStA. TO Tl£ SHIFT su>ERYISOR. 9700 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6, 1, 1,3.B SUGSESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE STA IOITORS IF POSSI!l.E. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-STA IS MlT REllJIRED TO CJl*RATE THE LWIT, aw li#LKOYER TO SHIFT SUPERVISOR IF 1£CESSARY,

• DATA CD.J.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ UBER: TP-1, 1 l<<lRJ<SPACE SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND WUDATION REJ!IARKS:

C-2 IIDIS INVn.. YED: ~RK l'O!BER LOCATION COIPONENT ,-SYSTEII SUBSYSTEII STA STATIONS H NlT IN INV FIL.£ t

• 17/11/85
• IUIW EIEINEERIN6 Dl&:REPA,CY REPORT QJRRY time CODE fl2127/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW Tllli RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---

20881414 SS ID:ESS TO FROOT LIIER PAIE1.S "40 FROOT lJIPER ~S. tlM ERROR: DIFFICLLT FORSS TO RESPINl TO PROBL.EMS AT FRONT PArEL.S. DIF FICUL T FOR OPS TO l()'y'E AROOND comn. AREA. Ht PRO!l.91 DE&:RIPTION:

IOE CORT ~LY ACCESS TO STA IS THRU REAR !AWAY F~ F~T PHLS>. CABINET DRAIERS Ii. 00TH ENDS BLOCt< ia:ESS. 1710 PARAGRAPH NJl'IBER: 6,1,1.3.C,l 6,1,1,3,C.2 6.1.1.6.A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CABil'ETS 1H DISPOSITION: DEL.HE-SHIFT SUPERVISOR DIRECTS RESPONSE RATt£R. T~ DIRECTLY PERFORIIIIN6 ACTI!lE

• DATA COLLECTION DE&:RIPTION AND CODE ftJIIIBER:

TP-1, 1 l<<lRl<SPACE SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION. AND VALIDATION AEJIIARKS: C-3 . IIDIS INVtl. VED: MRK NUJIBER LOCATION COIPC!f£NT SVSTE/4 SUBSYSTEM SS STATION ff NJT IN INV FILE t

• 17/15/85
• IUIAN OOINEERil'E DI&:~Y REPORT SURRY ~IT@ CODE 82./27/8,f, ASSESSIENT.

LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPIJSIBILITY STATUS DATE 282896 SCALE R$N3ES AREA INADEIDITE FOR *IINTAINIIE EQUIPNEMT PRIJlERLY, tlMAN ERROR: ~Y/ERROR IN (P ~. fff PROBLal DESCRIPTI~: C(N)LT OPS REQUIRE NR EXPANSI~ SOPE SOUS OR SlfflJRTil'E WRINSTRUENTATION C>>. OTl£R SOUS TD MAINTAIN EQUIP PRCPER 8710 PARAGRAPH fOIBER: 6. 5. 1, 2, A 6. 5. l, 2, D, 1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: EVIL rECESSITY FOR EXPANDING NR DR ADDINS SUPPORTING WR FDR ITEPIS LISTED AND PRDVIDE/l(ll)IF Y SOUS AS REOOIIIED, 1-1-1 DISPOSITION:

• CONSOLIDATED WITH PI-71 (28Ae2281/2209/221@/2211/2212/2213/2214/2215/2216/2217/2 218/2219/2228) 1 (SEE REPIARKSl DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIBE:R: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REAARKS: PI-109, DISP:S£E PI-72 (28A02202/22i4/2285/2296/22i7/2288), ITEIE IN\JOlVED:

MARK NUIIIBER LOCATION COlf!OpENT NAP!£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ~s H N'.JT IN INV FILE t

• 87/15/85
• KJIAN OOINEERitE DI~ REPORT SURRY ~ne CODE B 82/27/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---

2ee828e7 DISPLAYED IA.LIES REllJIRED CJ>ERATOR CDNERSI~.

1G) II -7 IDIAN ERROR: CP ERROR. HI PROBLEJII DESCRIPTICII: CPS ARE REllJIRED TO COWERT VAUES DISPLAYED~ saus TO A MlRE USABI.£ FORM IN ORDER TO u SE IN='O~TION. 8780 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6.5.1.2.B 6.5.1.2,C SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: CH/¥116£ SCIUS TO A .ORE USABI.£ FOllllt. lff DISPOSITION:

• ADD RNS IIARKS DISPLAY 511£ FOR TECH SPEC AND ~ARJII POINTS, AND IMPROVE OIAI . TY CF CURVE BOO<S. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ CODE '°'8£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~

AND VALIDATION AEMRKS: PI-119-1, ITEMS INVOLVED:

1. IRK NUIIBER LOCATICII COPIPOr£NT BAST LEva CAT LEVEL CC HEAD TAN< CST LEVEL ECST LEVEL EIER CST LVL PDIT LEVEL PRT LEVEL *RWST LEVEL I ACCl.11'1 LVL VCT LEVEL ff NOT IN INV FILE

• ff NOT IN INV FILE I H NOT IN INV FILE
• ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE
• ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE
• ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE
• SYSIDI SJBSYSTDI 82/25/85
• It.A OOINEERINS DISCREPA;,;. . . ... " . SURRY ~IT0 CODE B fl2./27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE R!:aPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------------------

---

282088 DISPLAYED VALLES REGUIRED IJ>ERATDR WNERSION.

r<<lD II -7 tOIAN ERROR: CP ERROR. / Hf PROBt.£111 DESCRIPTION: CPS ARE REOOIRED TO CONVERT VAL.lES.DISPI.AYED ON SCALES TO A l()RE USABLE FOl!JI IN ORDER TO U SE Il'FO~TION. 1711 PARAGRAPH NL>>IBER: 6,5,1.2.B 6.5.1.2,C SU66£STED BAD<FIT: SCALES TO A l'ORE USABL£ FORA. Ht DISPOSITION: ENSURE SCALE IIIRKINSS AR£ IN EPIII & THAT PROPER SCU CHART PAPER IS USED *

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Re!ARKS: PI-ll&-2 ITEPIS I NVOi.. VED: MRK NUl'IBER LOCATION COPIPOf£NT PAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LIQ WSTE FLW H MJT IN INV FILE 1
• fl2./25/85
• II.A OOINEERir<<, DISC~Y REPORT SURRY 1.rme CODE B .82/27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESP0'6IBILITY STATUS DATE -------------------------

---

20002m DISPLAYS 90I RANDCJil EQUIPMENT VARIATI~.

llJMAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN (J) RESPONS£. fff PROBL91 DESCRIPTI~: EN6 I -5 DISPLAYS ARE DIFFICULT TO US£ BECAUSE THEY DISPUlY f()RFIAI.. YARIATIOO IN EGUIMNT P ERFO~. 17e0 PARAGRAPH MJIIBER: 6.S.1.2.F SUSGESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE FILTERS TO REDLCE EQUIMNT f()IS£. ENSURE THAT~ EOOIMNT IS IN PROPtR ADJUST!£ NT. li!t DISPOSITION: ADD NR STEAIII FLfll IETER *

• DATA ro..LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION l9AR1<S: Pl-111-2 I IDIS INVO!.. VED: ~RI< POIBER LOCATION CO!P01£NT JAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTBI STEAPI FLOW H f()T IN INV FILE 1

• 82/25/85
• *
• EN6INEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT t CODE B 13/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPCNiIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------------------

---28002010 ItEORIIIATION REQUIRED TO USE saus NOT PRESENT. TRG II -6 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR RE~ tff. PROBLEJil DESCRIPTION: ll.l.TIPLIERS/DIVIDERS REQUIRED TO USE Wl.l.ES ON ~SARE NJT LOCATED ON OR ADJ~T TO SC IUS. 8700 PARAGRAPH IOIBER: 6.5.1.2,E SU66ESTED BACt<F IT: LABLE ~S WITH INFORMATION T~T IS NECESSARY TO USE Tl£ Wl.LES DISPLAYED. tff DISPOSITION: IIIPLE~T JPM FOR (PERATORS (),j SETTING !F 1-AJAN CONTROLLERS. CTEN TURN POTS>

• DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: T~ 9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATICl4 RBIARKS: PI-112 ITEMS INVl:l.VED:

LOCATION COIIIPONENT HANE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM !§AN CNTRL.S H NJT IN INV FILE* 13/17/86

• ltJlflH EN3INEERlrE DISCREPAtCY SURRY Ltme CODE B ~/27/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW t£D NO _ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------------------

---

28082911 DISPUIYS THAT MUST B£ COlf>ARED Il'O)l)ATIBI.E saus. TR6 II -£ It.A ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN (J) RESP()ISE, *" PROBl.9! DESCRIPTICti:

ll£N COJIIPARlr<<l DISPLAYS~ ll£ SAIIE PARMTER, DESIGNS AND MJERICSL PROSRESSICN, AR E INCOIC)ATIBI..E. 1780 PARAGRAPH t(JIIBER: 6.5.1.5.D SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: REPLACE SCALES. Ht DISPOSITION: TRAIN OPERATORS IN CORRELATI~ RECORDER CXJTPUT TO INDICATOR OOTPUT *

• DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ ~IDATION REJIIARKS: Pl-113, WI CONSEQ CF ERROR Dt£ TO AYAIL ~T l~O. ITEMS INVCLVED: lllARK fUBER LOCATION Cl)IR)fENT ff:IIIIE SYSTEM SJBSYSTEJII PRZR PR REC H NJT IN INV FILE 1

• 11/38/86
• ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 8 CODE B . 83/17/86 ASSES&ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 282912 L06ARITif1IC saus ARE 1.NECESSARY/DIFFIClA.T TO READ. ERROR: ERROR IN CP fff PROBLEPI DESCRIPTION:

L06ARITff1IC SCALES ARE DIFFia.tT TO READ TO ANY LEVEL IFim.JRACY. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1.5.E TRG II -6 Sl.66ESTa) BOO<FIT: . Hf

• REPl.AC£ LOOARITHMIC SCALES WITH ELECTID4IC DI6ITAL DISPLAYS AND COHVERT RECORDERS IF FEASI ru. DISPOSITI~:

~IZE TRAININ6 ON LOG SCALE READINS

• DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTIIJ4 AND CODE NlJIIIBER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REPIARKS: PI-114. L06ARITHMIOC SCALES REG DUE TO "'TURE IF PARAIETER ITE~ INVOLVED: ll!ARK NUMBER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAIii£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM H r()T IN INV.FILE f

• 83/17/86
• ENHNEERHE DISC~Y REPORT SURRY ltme CODE '2./27/86 ASSESSIENT L,AqT REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---

200e2913 WO ll.RMS P<<lT LOCATED AOOVE ASSOCIATED C(J{TR(l..5/DISP\.AVS.

CCJl)LT ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESm&:, H* PROBl..a. DESCRIPTI[)j: AtHJrCIATOR ALAR!IIS ASSOCIATED WITH SEM::RATOR AND DIESEL CONTRCLS ARE t(JT ON LOCATED [)I Tl£ PAIEl..

• 178e PARAGRAPH M.IMBER: 6.3.3.l.A 6.3.J.3.B SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: f()VE ANM.N:IATOR ILARlilS TO Tl£~ MELS AS ASSOCIAT~TRCI..S AND DISPLAYS.

DISPOSITION: DELETE -OPS ~'T Dlis<<lSE PROB/TAKE CORRECTIVE ~TIMROPI CR. lllST CALL L~ IP FOR THIS. THEREFORE, (RIIIRKSJ DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE N.MBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION TP-3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REJIIARl<S: PI-116. DISP: IOLlD rtJT t£LP TO 14WE Al.RPI ABOVE SEN PN.. I IDIS INVll.lJED: flARI< NI.JJIBER LOCATI~ CO!POr£NT NAIii£ SVSIDI SUBSVSTa. SEN CTRLS H rtJT IN INV FILE f

• 17/15/85
• OOINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~ne CODE A 92./27/86 A$ES9£NT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPCJEIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------------------

---

28982818 DISPUIYED Wl.lES REQUIRE IJ>ERATOR

~RSION. EN6 II -5 11.M ERROR: CP ERROR. ./ Ht PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: CPS ARE REQUIRED TO CONVERT YAl..lES DISPLAYED ON SCILES TO A.l(IRE USABLE FORM JN ORDER TO U SE Jt.fom.ATI(l(. 1710 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6.S.1.2.B 6.5.1.2.c SU66ESTED BACKF IT: SCALES TO A l(IRE USABLE FORJII. fH DISPOSITION:

• INSTALL METER FOR TOT~ AFW Fl.Ill (0-1500 6PM) AND PER PI-19-tS (28Ae3804)

ADD IE TER FOR. TOT~ BYPASS FW FLOW (0-2888 SPlill

• DATA COL.1.ECTION DESCRIPTION CODE rtJIIIBER: . TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION

~Rl<S: PI-118-4. ITEJIIS INVO...VED: MRI< NJJIBER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NA1E AFW FLOW TOTAL FW FLW

• ff f()T IN INY FIL.£ t ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII 11/11/85

.. EN>INEERI~ DISC~ REPORT tl./27/86

• ?:HRY ltHT8 CODE C ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPOeIBILITY STATUS DATE 20082919 DISPLqYED Vil.LIES REQUIRE CJIERATOR cnNERSION.

llM ERROR: (P ERROR. f*f PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: III-9 CPS AR£ REQUIRED TO COWERT VALLES DISPLqYED ON SCIU:S TO A !(IRE USABLE FORM IN ORDER TO U SE Irt=ORMATION. 170*1 PARAGRAPH M.JMBER: 6.5.1.2.B 6.5.1.2.C . SU66£STED BACKF IT: sm.£5 TO A !'ORE USABLE FORPI. ... DISPOSITION: CHANGE S(A£ TO READ IN PSIA -ll(JVE 1£TER fEXT TO OHER A EVAP 1£TERS. SEE PI-19-4 (20.113020)

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJMBE:R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~

VALIDATION ~RKS: PI-lle-3. ITEJII INVOLVED: BORON EVAP A I ID!S INVCl. VED: ~RK NUPIBER LOCATION CIJIPOt£NT NAME SYSTEJII 9.JBSYSTEJII PI-BR-109A '"873 IETER a:JRON RECOVERY SYSTEJII

• 82/25/85
• *
• KM ENJINEERI~

DISCREMC REPORT 82./27/86 9.JRRY ltme CODE C ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED N'.l TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 282820 DISPUIYS StOI RANDO! EQUIPMENT UARIATI~. 111-9 II.A ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CP AESP0.'8£. ffl PROBLEJi1 DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS ARE DIFFICll.T TO USE BmUlE THEY DISPLAY N'.llMll. RAHlXM VARIATION IN EOOIPl£NT PE RFONCE. 171e PA~RAPH l'iJIIIBER: 6.5,1.2,F Sl.166ESTED BSO<FIT: PROVIDE: FILTERS TO REDlCE EOOIP1£NT NJISE. ENSURE MT IU EOOIPfiENT IS IN PfHPER ADJUSTIII ENT. ffl D'lSPOSITI~: OCP BEEN INPLEMENTED TO CORRECT LP,! t()!SE PROBL01

• DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE 0££R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION REJIIARKS: PI-111-7 ITEMS INVCLVED: !ARK tOIBER LOCATION COJ1lOt£NT ttlE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LOSE PTS D H N'.JT IN INV FILE 1 11/38/86

• OOINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY 1.1ma CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED P() TITLE RESPIJeIBILITY STATUS DATE ~1 ItEORMATI~

REQUIRED TO USE sau5 J()T PRESENT. ttM ERROR: IIEUlY/ERIIOR IN CJ) RESPCNlE. Hf PR08L9I DESCRIPTI~: PDT LEVEL INDICATOR sm.ES 00 J()1 MTCH. uae PARAGRAPH OBER: 6. 5.1. 2. E S006ESTED BACKFIT: ENS LABa SCAl-£S WITH INFORMTI~ THAT IS r£CESSARY TO US£ THE WUES DISPLAYED, DISPOSITION: CCINDOCT I&C STUDY TO DETER1i1Ir£ RE!lJIRED SC~. COORDINATE WITH PI-19-4 (28Jl312 8) *

• DATA al.LECTI~

DESCRIPTION AND CODE "'"8£R: 'TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND Vfi.IDATI~ REMRKS: PI-113, LOW CONSEOOEtCE Cf ERROR DU£ TO ~TO PUfllPS & ILARMS. IIDCS INVO... VED: MRK IUIBER LOCATION C()IP()NENT NAIE LI-BR-la@ LI-BR-115

• r<<069 IETER NAAe68 IETER SYSIDI BOIOI RECOVERY SYSTEIII RECOVERY SYSTEII SUBSYSTEM II -7 12/25/85
• EttiIN£ERI"6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY . trma CODE A VJ2./27/Pi, ASSES9£NT LAST REVIEW H£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 281i2121 NO DISTil'CTIYE CODINS FOR EXTENDED DURATION ILLIJUN DURINS NOR!II IP .._ ERROR: ~y /ERROR IN IP RESP{)4SE.

Hf

• PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION:

ENS II -5 TILES 00 NOT KWE DISTil'CITIYE CODING FOR r<<l~ IP. IP r.Arf(IT DIST1t6JISH NlRIIA... FR [)I BIERGENCY COO> ITIIJ4 1710 PA~RAPH NJIIIBER: 6.3.3.2.F.1 SUGGESTED BACl<FIT: ESTABLISH ADMIN CONTROLLED WAY IF CODirE OR fllARKINS OF TILES 6fiIDi ARE TO BE ILLIJIINATED F OR EXTENDED DURATJ()t. Ht DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-85 !2eA02106) AND PI-2 (28A821Bll INOCIATOR STUDY *

• DATA CO...LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NlJIBER: TP-3.1 Atf{INICIATOR SYSTENS REVIEW REJl!ARKS: C-11 ITEMS I NY!l. YED: fllARK NmBER ~TION COlflOr£NT fM: SYSTEM SUBSYST91 ANO SYST91 H NlT IN INY FILE t

• 17/11/85 OOINEERiriJ DISC:~Y REPORT t2.127/86
• SURRY ~IT8 CODE A ASS£S9ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29802121 r<<l IIEFLASH CAPABILITY A'ft.lfCIATOR SYSTEJII It.A ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE.

Hf PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: ENS II -5 cnPtlt£NTS WITH ~RED ~!ATOR TILES CAIHlT REFLASH LIT TILE li.TIL PAEVIClJS ItCJIIIIriJ A LAJ!IIIS HAS BEEN CLEARED 1780 PA~RAPH NJIBER: 6.3.1.2,C.3 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: INSTALL REFLASH CAPABILTIES OR INDIVIWl. TILES TO EACH C()IIM:)(JNENT R..READY ON flJLTI-IN>UT A rto(;IATOR TILES. Ht DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-85 (28Ae2186l PI-2 (2:8A0211Ul ANNJNCIATOR STUDY *

• DATA CD..LECTI~

DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-3.l ArftJNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW RBIARKS: C-18 IIDIS INVCl.VED: MRK fOBER LOCATION COll>OrENT SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEfll 87/11/85 ---------*------

---

---

SYSTEM ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t

• l i II.A EN6INEERI"6 DISC~Y REPORT 82/27/86
• SURRY ~IT@ CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPC>>,SIBILITY STATUS DATE 282122 TILE DOES t<<:JT BURN STEADILY ..a TI£RE IS FLASHER FAILURE. tUIAN ERROR: IP ()M()T RE~ TO ll.AR,I SITUITION.

1 Hf PRO~ DESCRIPTION: . EN6 II -5 1M TILE LT DOE~T ILLUPIINATE & aJRN STEADILY lliEN FLASl£R FAILURE. CAUSil'E INABILITY TO D ETERPIINE TILE BURN OUT 1780 PARAGRAPH UIBER: 6.3.3.2.D SU66ESTED BAD<F IT: INST/ti~ WITH CAPABILITY TO ILLIJIIIINATE aJRN STEADILY lffN TILE IN t£ED OF REPAIR Ht DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-85 (~106) PI-2 (28A82llll ArftMIATOR STUDY *

• DATA COJ.ECTICN DESCRIPTI~ CODE OBER: TP-3.l ANl<<JIICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REl¥lRKS:

C-19 ITEMS INVCl. VED: ~RK IOBER LOCATION COIIIPOf£NT NAIIIE: SYSTEM SUBSYST01 IMtJN SYST01 H NlT IN IPN FILE 1

• 17/11/85
• tt.R 06IN£ERIIE DI&'CREPAM'.:Y REPORT SURRY ~Inl CODE C '2/27/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20002237 Il<<:ORRECT YERTICll.

IETER SCALE IUIAN ERROR: ~LAYED/UO< OF OPERATOR RE~ UCORECT OPERATOR RESP!:N1 E. 1H PROBI.DI DE&'CRIPTICIN: IIHI VERTICAL. IETERS Ir<<:ORRECT SOUS, (u.! VB SECT 1-2 IWD SIIUATOR,) (v.1$ VB SECT 31 171!0 PARAS~ l'UIIIBER:

6. 5. l. l. B 6. 5. 1. 5. D SU93ESTED .BACKF IT: ENSURE CORRECT lfTR SDUS INSTIU£D, StO..tD BE SAIIIE AS SC$LES VflS LABEL£D t<<lT LES tfiSI LitE FLOW LOCP A & C. 1H DISPOSITil),r:

SUBP1IT NlINT~ RE!l.lEST TO CORRECT saus AS PER .BACKFIT *

• DATA CO..LECTI~

DE&'CRIPTll),r AND CODE NJl££R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RENlRl<S: DS-31-1 ITEMS INVCl.VED: lflRK N>>IBER LOCATION co,Jl()f,£Nl PIK FI-1--968 ff r(JT IN INV FILE 1

• SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM 17/11/85
• *
• t<<.W,Vj 06IPIEERI"3 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODEC f/2./27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW l£D f(J . TITLE RESP{N;IBILITY STATUS DATE 21002238 It<<:ORRECT 1/ERTIDl.

IETER sal.E. 11M ERROR: ll£1JlYED/~ CF [l)ERATOR RESP0NS£. HOJRRECT [l)ERATQR RESPON SE. lff PROIUJII DESCRIPTION: 1/ERTI~ 1£TERS IN:ORRECT SCSUS. (UiSI PP FUlW: FI-2-945 I FI-2-946) 87N PARASRl¥>H NIJIIBER: 6.5.1.1.B 6.5.1,5.D Sl.66ESTED BAC!{FIT: III-8 ENSURE VIIIS FOR 1.14IT 2 LHSI PP FL~ IFl-2-945 AND PI-2-946) ~TCl£S llillT 1 LHSI PP FLOW JIIET ER SOUS. lff DISPOSITIOH: SUBl'IIT ~INT~ REll.lEST TO CORRECT SCIUS PER .BACKFIT

• DATA CO..LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIUER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RBIARKS: DS-31-2 ITOO INVO..VED: MRK NUMBER LOCATION fDllOtENT Fl-2-945 FI-2-946 METER METER SYSTal !WETY INJECTION SYSTal SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SUBSYSTal PRESSURIZER SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD 87/11/85 EM;INE£RirE DlSCREPIM:Y REPORT 12./27/1*,

• SURRY ~IT0 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED t¥J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 290e2239 UCORRECT YERTICR. EER sal.E. ERROR: DELAYED/ HCORRECT /UO< Cf' CPERATOR RESPO\'SE.

fff PROBLBI DESCRIPTION: YERTICR. IETERS INCORRECT sal.ES. (PRZR PRESS CONT IUERS CH I). 1700 PARAGRAPH MJIBER: 6.5.1.1.B 6.5.1.5.D Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE CORRECT IIITR saus INSTIUED. fff DISPOSITION:

• PRZR PRESS CONT PI-1-444 CHI CU-1> AND PI-2-444 (LJ-2) SH{ll] IIIATCH
• DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2. VERIFICATION AND WLIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REPIAR!<S: . DS-31-3 IIDIS INYO..YED:

MRI< rtmBER LOCATION Co,fl()f£NT SYSTEM H r<<JT IN INV FILE t NlD III-8 9.JBSYSTEM PI-1-4'+'t PI-2-444 PAA318 IETER Rm:TOR COOI.JINT (PRIMRY l.OOl, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER

• 87/11/85
• *
• tiM ENJIIEERIN3 DISCRmN:Y REPORT SURRY UNITi CODEC te./27/86 ASSESS1ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESP(JrEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28812241 It<<:ORRECT VERTICR..

IETER 5aU. NlD III-8 IUIAN ERROR: IB.AY/ERAOR/Lro< IF CPERATOR REWEE. *'" PIIOILal DESCRIPTION: VERTICR.. METERS IN:ORRECT saus. Slll HDR PRESS IHRS Pl-( >-468/466/464A DO NJT IIATDi ff* 1718 PARAGRAPH N.JMBER: 6.5.1,1,B 6.5,1.5,D SU66ESTED BAD<F IT: ENSURE CORRECT flTR SCIUS IHSTIUED. DISPOSITION: ENSURE CORRECT MTR SCIUS INSTIUED: DAE£ TO 0 1 289,408,608, 88'!1 1 UW, 121ll IN lN IT 1 AND ~IT 2

• DATA cru.ECTic>>I DESCRIPTION AND CODE rtJ1118£R:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION 114D ~IDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY Ra!Afl(S: DS-31-4. ITEJIIS Il'Ml. YED: !!ARI< rul!EA LOCATic>>I COIPMNT PI-1-464A Pl-1-466 PI-1-468 PI-2-464A PI-2-466 PI-2-468 ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff l<<>T IN INV FILE 1 ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff l'(JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NJT IN I~ FILE t ff r<<JT IN : ,,:; F-ILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYST91 17/11/85

• *
• ENSINEERINS DISCREPAJCY REPORT 82/27/86 SURRY UNIT8 CODE B TITLE 21183815 COOID.S DO NJT PROVIDE LEVEL IF PRECISION REQUIRED.

tl.JllN ERIIJA: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPCNSE. ' Hf PROa.91 leCAIPTION: ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPCl6IBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 I -5 85/82/85 IPS CArHJT REGl.l.ATE/ADJUST COHTA(LS FOR EOOIPIENT TO THE LEI/EL IF PRECISION REllJIRED. 0798 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6. 9. 3. 2.. A 6. 9. 3. 2, B SUEESTED 8":KFIT: EWLUATE CIRCUITS AND IIODIFY AS REQUIRED. Hf DISPOSITION: EWA~ BEEN ISSLED TO CORRECT

• DATA c:w.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE IUIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: Pl-115-5 ITEMS Il'Ml. VED: JIIAAK rumER LOCATION COflONENT 1M SYSIDI .OOA CTR H NJT IN INV FILE 1
• *
• ttM 9'INEERIN6 DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY I.NIT@ CODE B 82./27/fk, ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW l£D It) TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21183116 CTRI.S ~T IIJST BE OPERATED snu. TirEWSL Y LOCATED TOO FAR APART. ENG tU9I ERROR: / DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESP()EE.

fff PROll.8! DESCRIPTI~: CPS REPORT MT THEY LOSE TROCK SETIIN6S/READiftiS lliILE WALKirE BETWEEN POINTS. 07N PARAGRAPH ~R: 6. 8. 3.1, C Sl.¥36ESTED BACKFIT: II -6 NEC£SS1TY FOR LOCATINS CTRLS CLOSER & RELOCATE IF r£C£SSARY. ADD ~T CTR!. FORE I1l£R FIKTI~ DISPOSITION: RED*SI6N AUX VENT PANEL -C01f:i0l..IDATE ILL COMlN EQUIP~ Sil'G.E BOARD & PROVIDE ,muc. DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTION~ CODE NIJIBER: TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ ~IDATION TP-4. l CONTROLS SURVEY ffBIIA!f(S: PI-117. !SEE PI-19 122F23826>. IIDIS INYCl. YED: ~RI< fUIBER LOCATION COIOENT t9IE DE~ BUl6 H r<<JT IN INY FILE t SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM 05/03/85

• *
• tlJAf ENSINEERING DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE B TITLE 2tel3817 C(MR(L SWITCH umm IS ItCONSISTENT ttJllN ERROR: ERROR IN CJ> RESPCN,E.

fff PROILEJII DESCRIPTI~: IDlJIUATOR WSW LAYClJT IS INCllEISTENT WITHIN PAM:I.. 6ACXJ>Ifli. 1798 OBER: 6.8.2.3.A S006ESTED BACKFIT: REWIRE RELABEL ~VE SWITCHES. +-1-1 DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-19 (201/13022>. REARRAM3E AND RELAB£L DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION RBiARKS: PI-118 ITalS INIJ(l.lJED: ~RK OBER LOCATI~ COIR>>ENT NAIE SYSTEJII TEST H M'.lT IN INV FILE t 02/27/Bf:, ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS I -2 17/15/85 SUBSVSTEJII

• *
• tlM EhGINEERIIE DISCREPArCY REPORT VJ2./27/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28884211 TRANSFER IF I~ORMTIIII DURIIE SHIFT Dw.sE t<<:IT ADE~TE. ttR ERROR: D£LAY /ERROR IN IP RE~. Ht PROa.91 DESCRIPTIIII:

CCMPLT EQUIP STATUS LOO IS t<<:IT ll.WAYS ~RATE AND CPS SOll£TIIES ,uss I/ERR. REPORTS. STATUS LOO IS IN ADEQUATE. 8780 PA~RAPH romER: 6:1.1.2.A SU66£STED BAD<F IT: 6EIERATE ADIIIN PROC !XJTLINI"6 RE~IBILITY/IIETHOD Of TRANSFERRI"6 EOOIP STATUS INFO FRI)! SHIFT TO SHIFT. fl-f DISPOSITIIJI: EXISTING ADfllIN PROCEDURE IS ~TE -ffN FOLL.OWED PRCPERLY

• DATA Clll.ECTIIII DESCRIPTIIII AND CODE UBER: TH.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ~RKS: PI-88 ITEMS INVCl.VED:

~Rt< tUIBER LOCATIIJI Cl)fl{lliOT FM SYSIDI SUBSYST01 STATtS LOO H NIT IN INV FILE f I 17/15/85

• * .
• ltJAj Eh6INEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY RfPCJRT 02/27/86 SURRY Ltml . co~ A$ESSll£NT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RE5m4S1BILITY STATUS DATE 28AN111 Flll VIEW IF PAr£1.S NOT POSSIBLE FRO! DESl<S AND CCNnES ERROR: FAIL TO RE~ TO DISPLAYS 1H PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:

CCNll.T l))ERATORS AND SHIFT StJ1£RVISORS 00 NJT All VIEW IFClWTRCl.S AND DISP\.AYS FIOI THE DES KS AND CO'm.ES fH 178e PARAGRAPH rtJIIIEA: 6.1.1.3.A SU66*STED BACKF IT: DETERMINE REQUIRED VIEWING AA£AS OF BOARD AND RE-ro5ITION DESKS AND CONSOLES ACCORDINGLY DISPOSITION: SS:DaETE SS NJT REOOIRED TO OITOR FROII SEATED POSTN <SEE C-112Nl1482l, !P/()l)TR: T~ CARE .IF IN !RMl<l DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.Jf!BER: TP-1. 1 l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY AEM~S1 PI-1 DISP: P-258 lJl6RADE. !SEE PI -91 !21818311>

• ITEMS Il'NCX. '-El: NARK fUIBEA LOCATION C(Jll(J£NT rM ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t svsm SUBSYSTEM 17/11/85
• *
• EMiINEERINS DISCREPAN'.:Y REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE B 'il2/27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t< B£TWEEN BBS IN BETWEEN B8S IWD VBS -MJORTRIP ~ZARO. 07N PARAGRAPH

~R: 6.1.1.J.C.1 StmSTED IIACKFIT: REJIOVE RIM> AN> INSTIU CABLES B8£ATH THE FLOOR. 1H DISPOSITION: INVESTIGATE FEASIBILITY IF AELOCATINS CAU:

• DATA CCl.LECTIOO DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE IOIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND W:...IDATIDN TP-1.1 l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY REMARKS: E-22 IIDIS I NVCl. '.£D: ~RK tUIIER LOCATIC* a>>mENT NAIi£ CR ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t SYST9' ENS II -6 11/11/85 SUBSYST9'

• *
• ttM OOINEERHE DISCREJ>At£Y REPORT SURRY UNITi CODE TITLE 28AN115 INADEMTE StJlPLY CF EXPENDA9-ES AND UO CF CODING. tUIAN ERROR: INABILITY TO PIAINTAIN CR EQUIPMENT.

fff PROaal DESCRIPTION: EX~ SUPPLY IS INADE~TE AND l(lT CLEARLY LABELED/CODED, VN PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER: 6.1.1.5.A SOOGESTED BOCXFIT: 82/27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ct>>llt..T 17/15/85 PROVIDE ADE~TE SUPPLY IF EXPENDABLES WITH ~ROPRIATE L.AB8.IN6/C0DIN6. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE -SEE PI-38 (28080189)

• DATA C(UECTICJ't DESCRIPTICJ't AND CODE NJIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATICIH TP-1.7 PIAINTAIIWU!ILITY SURVEY REMA Rl<S: E-48 ITEMS INVCl. \e: IIARK l'UIBER LOCATION a>>IPClENT rAE IU.BS PAPER PRHTR RIBD ff l<<JT IN INV FILE* ff r<<lT IN INV FILE* ff r()T IN INV FILE* SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll
• *
• 82./27/86 SURRY LWI11 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28AN213 LAD( CF PERIODIC MAINTENAM:E TESTS -CCJIUHCATIIH, ENG II -7 11/31/86 11M ERROR: , CCJIIOICATICJI ERRORS -LOST OR GARSLEI)" fff PROILal DESCRIPTION:

IP REPORTS T~T COM.IHCATICWS SYSTEMS ARE f()T RE6ll.ARLY TESTED TO ENSURE IIA.ITY. 8781 PARAGIRIH to!BER: 6.2.1.1.B SOOGESTED BACKFIT: ESTABLISH PROC£DURES FOR PERIODIC COMJNICATION SYSTEfllS TESTS. fff DISPOSITION: PREVENTIVE MAINTErfM:E TESTINS SIO.LD BE PERFORIED. REFER Tll>I-45 (20881287>

• DATA Cll.LECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIIBER: TP-1.7 MAINTAI'4UIILITY SURVEY REMARKS: E-42 I TENS Il'Ml. VED: MARK fiJIIB£R LOCATION COIPOM:NT SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII COMJNIC SYS H f()T IN INV FILE 1
• *
• It.A EN6IN*ERIN6 DISCAEPAtCY R£PORT SURRY UNIT& CODE B . 02/27/Sh ASSESSMENT LAST. REVIEW HED I'll TITLE RESPOOSIBILITY STATUS -DATE 28AN314 UICI( IF aJllUTER ACKtOl.ED6E FOR CPERATOR DATA ENTRY. tUDf ERROR: CPERATOR CAN INADVERTENTLY OR INCORRECTLY CHIN£ COIRJTER AL ARM SETPOINT.

fH PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: EN6 II -7 cmPUTER 00£S' t(IT OR REQUEST VERIFICATION HN OPERATOR ENTERS DD&: (E. 6., C HAN6E IN SETPOINT.l 1780 PARAGRAPH r<<>>!BER1 6.7.1.1,D SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IODIFY SOFTWARE TO RE!XJEST VERIFICATION FR(JII ~RATOR. .... DISPOSITION: IJ)GRAilE PROCESS aJIIPUTER. SEE PI-91 (~ll DATA CO-LECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-7.1 COIIIPUTER SYSIDI REVIEW REJIIARKS: E-2. ITENS INV(L~: MAK POIBER LOCATIOH CQIIRlfENT NAfE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII ff NJT IN IIW FILE

• to/17/85
• *
• IOIAH EftJINEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY tMIT0 CODE B W27/86 ASSESSfiEHT LAST REVIEW t£D I() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A09315 ILLOOICA Cl>ERATOR-<lJlllJTER DHl.lXil.E, IUIAN ERROR: DELAYS IN ENTERIN6/RETREIVlN6 DATA. ft-I PROILER DESCRIPTION:

ENS II -7 COflP DI~OOl£ l()T EFFICIENT:~ IS BY ADDRESS, t()T PA~R/C()!l)()£NT; I() PIDPTINS; I() ED I THE CAPABILITY. 17N PARAGRAPH rtJIIIBER: 6.7,1.2.A 6.7.1,3,A 6.7.1.3.B 6.7,1.3,D S006ESTED ~IT: IIODIFY SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE flORE EFFICIENT DI~CB.JE. tt-1 DISPOSITION: !JlSRADE PROCESS COIIPlJTER. SEE PI-;98 (2Ml0381)

• DATA cru.ECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: . TP-7.1 CQIIIPUTER SYSTEM REVIEW ~~S: E-3. ITENS INW.. l,{I): ~AK ru!BER LOCATI~ COllOfENT SYSIDI 9.JBSYSTEJII ff l()T IN INV FILE* / ~/17/85

• *
• 28AN316 Ill>RIJIER KEYOIRD SI..CPE. ..... ERROR: DATA ENTRY ERRORS. fff PROBt.91 DESCRIPTICJI:

llNlN Etf:llNEEAlrti DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY lJHTB CODE 8 TITLE W27/S6 ASSESSIENT ~T REVIEW RESmEIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -7 V/6/07/85 ~RD DOES NJT CCM=ORIII TO SOOGESTED SLIP£ !15 DSREE -25 DEGREES FRI)! t()RIZONT~. > 0701 PARAGRAPH l'UIBER: 6. 7.1.~.6 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE KEYBOORD WITH RECOPflENDED SLCPE. fff DISPOSITION: lPSRADE PROCESS WflUTER. S£E Pl-90 (~ll

• DATA CCllECTIOO DESCRIPTIOO AND CODE NUIBER: TP-7.1 CQIIIPUTER SYSTE/11 REVIEW ~S: E-5 I IDIS I NVCl. l,{l): IA!a< NJIIIBER l.OCATIOO IDIP()OT ,-SYSTEJI ff t<<JT IN IW FILE t SUBSYSTEM
• TITLE lt..R EN6INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 29AN317 NO YIStR. FEEDEKI< lffN ENTERil'E DATA. llWlN ERROR: DELAY IN REC06NIZil'E DATA ENTRY ERROR. fff PROaal DESCRIPTION:

ifi./27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -7 V/6/97/85 CCJP IXESN'T DISPLAY DATA AS THEY ARE KEYED IN -t<<DS TH91 IN BUFFER, Tl£N DISPLAYS THal lffN ENTRY IS COIC>LETE 1798 PARAGRAPH rtJIIIBER: 6.7.1,4,H SU66ESTED BACKF IT: JIIJDIFY SOFTWARE TO DISPLAY DATA AS Tl£Y AR£ ENTERED. fff DISPOSITI~: IJJ6RADE PROCESS C(JIPUTER, SEE PI-98 (29N9Jll), DATA co.J.ECTICW DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE l'UIBER: TP-7.1 COIIIPUTER SYSTE/11 REVIEW REIW1<S: E-fl. ITEMS INVCL'.e>: !ARK fUIBER LOCATION CO!P()ENT NAflE BC RESET/LO PROCESS CDI> ff l'(JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYST91 SUBSYSTEM

• • *
• EN6IN£ERirE DISCREPIKY REPORT SURRY UNITla CODE B 82/27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPC>>eIBILITY STATUS DATE ~18 LACK IF ERROR PAOTECTIIJI.

tUIAN ERROR: / LOSS IF Itf=ORMTI~ IF COOITER LOCKS UPS. 1.HWAILABILITY CF C()l)IJTER. Hf PAOBLEJII DESCRIPTIIJI: ENG II -7 IP REll.ESTS CAN OVERUm CIMl & CAUSE L00<-1.P fllAl<IN6 BOOTSTR$¥l rECESSARY. <DURirE OBSERV, IP lHUl.E TO OVERRIDE> 1708 PARASRM-1 NJIIIBER:

6. 7.1.2.D SU66ESTED BACKF IT: EXPAND COit> CAPABILITY TO HANDLE EXPECTED APPLICATIONS (E. S., SRoo:> REVIEW!. PROVIDE OP 0V ERRIDE CAPABILITY.

fff DISPCISITI~: I.PSRADE PROCESS COPIPUTER. SEE PI-91 (2e088381}

• DATA cru.ECTIIJI DESCRIPTIIJI AND CODE NUMBER: TP-7.1 a>>IPUTER SYSTBII REVIEW REJIIARKS:

E-7 I TEfllS I NW. '.JED: JIARK NJfllBEfl L.OCATillf cnl>ONENT CNlff PflP CTS PCS VENT ISO PROCESS ClJIP ff r(IT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<lT IN IW FILE 1 SYSTBII SIJBSYSTEfl V/6/U/85

• *
• tlJIAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPArCV REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B TITLE 29AN319 LACK (f' DECIIR. POINT LirElP: tUAil ERROR: READIN6 ERRORS. lff PAOBL£M DESCRIPTI~:

IUERIC IXJTPUT IS r()T ll.ISNED BV DECIIR. POINT, 8781 PARAGRAPH MJIBER: 6.7.2.4.J Sl.66ESTED BACl(fIT: lilCIDIFY SOFTWARE TO I\.ISN DECI~ POINTS. lff DISPOSITION: lPSRADE PROCESS CQIIPUTER. SEE Pl-90 (2'1000301), DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTICN AND CODE NI.JIBER: TP-7,1 COOJTER SYSTEM REVIEW ~S: E-8. I TEJIIS INYCl. VED: NARK rtJIIIB£R LOCATI~ COIP()ENT ,-CONTRCLS FIRE PROT .PN PROCESS COi) ff f()T IN lffJ FILE

• ff t<<JT IN IffJ FILE* ff r()T IN INY FILE* SYSTEM 02./27/~ ASSES&IENT LAST REVIEW RESP(J4SI8ILITY STATUS DATE EN6 II -1 . V/6/87/65 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• W321 NJ HI6tU6HTIN6.

tlA ERROR: ltJfAj OOINEEAIN6 DISCIIEPAN'.:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE B TITLE DELAY IN AECOONJZIN6 Ufflll CONDITION ON CAT. fff PROll.91 DESCRIPTION: 'i!2./27/~ ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -7 16/97/85 CQIIIP DOES ~T HI6tl.I6HT/OCCENMTE LABELS, CAITI~ JIIESSAGES. (~DID URfl INTENSITY INADE IUITE.) 8788 PARAGRAPH rt/lllBEA: 6.7.2.4.P 6.7.2.5.K 6.7.2.7.A SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: MlDIFY SOFTWARE TO HIGHLIGHT IIIESSA6ES: FLASHING, INVERSE-VIDEO. fff DISPOSITION: UPSRADE PROCESS co,ipurEA. SEE PI-98 (28010381> DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUNBER: TP-7.1 IDIPUTER SYSTEJII REVIEW REMARKS: E-9 I TEJIIS ItMl. 'JED: IARK NJIIIBER LOCATION IDIPONENT NAIIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII H ~T IN INV FILE t

• *
• ttJA4 OOINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT V/2./27/86 SURRY UNITe CODE B ASSESS1£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A80321 LACK OF NECESSARY FEEDBACK.

11 -7 '1!6/U/85 IOIAH ERROR: DELAYS IN RETRIEVING DATA. tff PROBlB! DESCRIPTION: COIIIPUTER DOES NOT DISPLAY FEEDBACK FOR: DELAYS IN PROCESSING REQUEST/ACTIVITY; COIIPLETICIN CF REQUEST/ACTIVITY. 071:18 PARAGRAPH l'UIBER: 6.7.2,6.K 6.7.2.6.L SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: ,ODIFY SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE THELY FEEDBACK. tff DISPOSITION: IJ)SRADE PROCESS COPIPUTER. SEE PHIi l~ll, DATA ClllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIIBER: TP-7, l COO.HER SYST£111 REVIEW REl'Jl~S: E-10 ITEIIIS INY!l. VED: IAAK tt.lPIBER LOCATION COl'tPONENT NA.IE SYST£111 SUBSYST£111 H NOT 1N INV FILE 1

• *
• HED t() 20AN322 PRINTER SPEED. ERROR: TITLE tlR ENSINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY IIHT0 CODE B DELAY IN ~SSING REOOESTED INFCIIM!TI!Jf.

fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: 02./27/86 ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -7 io/07/85 PROCESS Cl)IPIJTER PRINTER DOES "1T PRINT AT R£CCWIEND8) SP£ED Cf 3M LINES PER PIINUTE. 0780 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6. 7.3. l.D Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: UPGRADE PRINTER TO PROVIDE SUS6ESTED PRINT SP£ED, fff DISPOSITION: UPSRADE PROCESS CQIIIPl.JTER. SEE PI-90 (20N8301 >

• DATA COLLECT!~

DESCRIPTicr4 AND CODE ~BER: TP-7.1 COMPUTER SYSTail REVIEW REMARKS: E-12 IIDIS INVOLVED: NARK tu!BER LOCATlcr4 COIIPONENT ,-SYSTail PROCESS COJIIP H MlT IN INV FILE I SUBSYSTail /

• *
• HUMAN OOINE£RI1'6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B TITLE 29A8l323 LACK OF PRINTER PROCEDURES.

IU!AN ERROR: DELAY OR ERRORS IN l'IAINTAINll\6 COIIP\JTER PRINTER. tH PROBWI DESCRIPTION: 02/27/86 ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -7 81/30/86 r<<J PROC£DURES FOR IIIAINTAINING COIIIPUTER PRINTER (E,6., RIBBON CHAl'6E 1 PAPER CHA&, ETC.> Hf 8788 PARASRAPH NlJIIBER:

6. 7.3.1.E.3 SU36ESTED BACKFIT: PROVID£ PROCEDURES.

DISPOSITION: 1Jl6RAD£ PROCESS COll'.PIJTER, SEE PI-90 (20000301), DATA CCUECTI~ ll£SCRIPTI~ AND CODE NURSER: TP-7, 1 COMPUTER SYSTE:"4 REVIEW R91ARKS: E-13 IIDIS INYll.YED: ~RI< MJIBER LOCATION COIRJNENT ~PE svsm1 PROCESS COi> ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f SUBSYSTEPI

• *
• HED N'.I TITLE 1-UMN £NSIN££RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 2'Ae8324 rtl T~ LP DEVICE FOR PRINTER PAPER. HJIAN ERROR: llAflA6E OR LOSS OF COlfll.JTER RECORDS. / "* PROIA.al DESCRIPTION:
• 02./27/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -7 06/07/85 N'.I TAKE UP DEVICE FOR PRINTER PAPER -PAPER FALLS~ BEHIND PRINTER. Hf 87e& PARABRAPH NIJIIIBER:

6. 7.3.1.E.5 Sl66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE TAKE UP DEVICE. DISPOSITION:

UPGRADE PROCESS CQIIIPUTER. SEE PI-90 (~l)

• DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-7.1 COMPUTER SYSTEJII REVIEW REJIIARKS:

E-14. I TEJIIS IN'v(l. VED : IAIIK l'UIBER LOCATION CD,1PONENT NAPIE SYSTEJII PROCESS COlfl H N'.IT IN INV FILE* SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• HUPIAN ENSINEERING DISCR'"'i;PANCY REPORT . S'JRRY UNIT0 CODE B 02127/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---20ANJ25 OBSCURED PRINTER OUTPUT IUflN ERROR: IIISREAD DISPLAY OUTPUT. H-1 PROael DESCRIPTION: ENS PRINT HEAD ON PRINTER STll>S AT LAST CHARACTER PRINTED -OBSCURES VIEW OF OUTPUT. 0700 PARAGRAPH NIJIIIBER:

6. 7.3.1.F.1

6. 7.3.1.F.4 SL&STED BACKFIT: IIKlDIFY SOFTWARE TO ISSUE LINE FEEDE COP'J'l'IAND TO PRINTER AT END OF LINE. lff DISPOSITION:

I.PGRADE PROCESS CQffl)UTER. SEE Pl-~ <200003011

• DATA ctUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE TUBER: TP-7.1 ro.PIJTER SYST~ REVIEW Ra!ARKS: E-15. IIDIS INVOC.VED:

~AK NJllllER LOCATION COfl'ONENT NAfilE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM COIi) PRINTER H ~T IN INV FILE t II -7 06/07/85

• HUPIAN OOIN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ~/27/86 ASSESS~ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE LIO( IF ~TRAST IF PRINTER OUTPUT. ERROR: READIN6 ERRORS. Hf PROIUM DESCRIPTION:

ENS II -7 11.JTPUT ~RD TO READ FROPI LACK IF CONTRAST -PROB COflllOlWDED BY SUIRE ON Ii.ASS COVER, RIBBO N l<<JRN, r<<) REPLACEJIENT 87N PAIIASRAPH tUBER: 6.7.3.1.F.2 SU66£STED BACKF IT: INSTIU r<<l~R£ GLASS ON ENCLOSURE. ENSURE ADEOOATE SUPPLY OF RIBBONS AVAILABLE. CHANGE RI~ RE6ULARI..Y. Hf DISPOSITil)I: IP6RAOE PROCESS COPIPUTER, SEE PI-90 (20000301), DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-7,1 CQll!PUTER SYSTEM REVIEW REAARKS: E-16. IIDIS I NYll. VED: IIIARK NJMBER LOCATION COJllONENT NAfllE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM PRINT 11.JTPUT H r<<lT IN INV FILE f 06/07/85

• *
• HED I() TITLE HU~ EN61NEER1N6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 02/27/86 ASS~T LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ----------------------

---

~7 LOCK CF SELECTIVE C(M)UTER llJTPUT FOR ALARM IE~S. tlA ERROR: DELAY IN SYNTHESIZHE

/URI! IESSA6ES. H4 PROBt.91 DESCRIPTION: ENG OP CANhOT REQUEST SPECIAL PRINTOOT OF ALAR!IIS BY SROI.P (SYSTE/11 1 COfi!PON£NT, ETC.I. ff4 0700 PARAGRAPH NUl'IBE R: 6. 7.3.2.C SU66ESTED BACKFIT: l'ODIFY SOFTWARE TO ALLOW AL.ARP! SR0UPIN6. DISPOSITION: UP6RADE PROCESS COPIPUTER. SEE Pl -90 (20000301 l, OOTA CCllECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUMBER: TP-7.l ro.?UTER SYSTEl'I REVIEW REJIIA~S: E-17, ITBIS INW. VED: IIWIRK tOIIIER LOCATION cmiPONENT SYSTEM H l'fJT IN INV FILE

• SUBSYSTEM 11 -7 06/07/85
• * * £N6IN££RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ~/27/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HeD r<<:l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20Al8328 r<<:l ll.A~ IDENTIFICATI~ PRINTOUT. ERROR: DELAY IN LOCATIIE IURf! ll!ESSA6ES.

ffl PROll.EM DESCRIPTION: ENS II -7 ll.ARN 1Essi:w£5 ARE 91BEDDED IN a>>IPUTER PRINTOOT, r<<:l READILY DISTINGUISHABLE FRQIII r<<:lN-ALAR 111 IESSA6ES. 171118 PARAGRAPH MJIIIBER:

6. 7.3.2..D SUSSESTED BACKFIT: PROV ll!ETHOD TO DISTINGUISH IURl'I "5SGS. $U66EST ALRMS BEPRINTED IN RED OR WORD ALARPI WRITI EN IN CAPS BEFORE IESS fff DISPOSITION:

lP6RADE PROCESS COPIPUTER. SEE PI-9e (~ll, DATA COLLECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE ruBER: TP-7.l COMPUTER SYST8'1 REVIEW Ra!ARKS: E-18. ITOO INVa.VED: ~RK NJIBER LOCATION ClM>ONENT tM: SYSTE!tl SUBSYSTBI PROCESS COi) H r<<:lT IN INV FILE* I 06/07/85

• *
• ttMN EN6INEER1t<6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE B 02./27/86 ASSESS111ENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE t<<l 6RW>INi [F DISPLAY OJTPUT. tUIAN ERROR: ERRORS IN READitt:i DISPLAY *. H4 PROBLEM DESCRIPTI~: . ENG II -7 STANDARD DISP PA6E IS TABI.£ [F PARAIETERS/WUES/SETPOINTS

-OUTPUT t<<lT 6ROOPED/SEPARATED TO FACILITATE READING. 8788 PARAGRAPH OBER: £>. 7,J,J,D,2 SUGGESTED BACKF IT: .ODIFY SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE SPACE BETWEEN EACH 6Rrul OF FIVE Llr£S. H4 DISPOSITI~: lP6RADE PROCESS COMPUTER. SEE PI-98 <20000301), DATA ClllECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUfllBER: TP-7,l CIIIPUTER SYSTEM REVIEW REMARKS: E-19 I TEJIIS I NYa.. VED: MIi< fUIBER LOCATION COIRJNENT NAfllE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM COfRJTER CRT ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t 06/07/85 .------------------------------------~---- --* *

• HED t<<l TITLE HU~ EN6INEER1N6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 alllE B 28AN338 INAIIEUTE SEPARATION BETWEEN Cll.lJINS ON CRT, ttMAN ERROR: READIN3 ERRORS. I 1H PROa.£111 DESCRIPTION:

COUJfE INADEllJATE SEPARATION (1 ~RACTER WIDTH>, 97N PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.7.3.3.D.3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: tc./27/86 ASSESSJIIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -7 '116/0_7/85 ,-;)DIFY SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE JIIINIIUI OF Tli<<l (2) ClflRACTER WIDTHS OF SEPARATION BETWEEN COLI.Jr4 NS. 1H DISPOSITION: lPSRADE PROCESS CQlllUTER, SEE Pl-90 (2000030]), DATA Cll.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND alllE OBER: TP-7,1 Cl)IPUTER SYST~ REVIEW R91ARKS: E-21. IIDIS INVCl VElh l!AIIK tUIBER LOCATION IDIJOrENT rAE SYSTEfil SUBSYSTEJII COfllUTER CRT H NJT IN INV FILE t

• * * ~INEERIIE DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/27/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE ASSESS/IIENT

.AST REVIEW TITLE RESPCJeIBILITY STATUS DATE 11M ERROR: FOREIGN OBJECTS ENTERINS THE !PENIIES COll.D CAUSc EQUIPIENT FAILURE/~TI~.

Hf Plllll£lll DESCRIPTION: PAl£I.. SEVERAL OPENlrei <HOLES> WHERE ~TS liWEBEEN REJICVED, 07N PARAGRAPH NtMBER: 6.1.1. 3. 6 StmSTED BAO<FIT: CQIIIPI..T PROCEDURE SHCllD BE ESTABLISHED TO ENSURE CONTROL PANEL OPENINGS/HOLES ARE GUARDED/COVERED fH DISPOSITION: D£l£TE: EQUIP BEING IIODIFIED, HOLES WILL BE COVERED WHENfl!ODS COfllPLETE. H!LES ALR EADY COVERED SIN:E PHOTOS TAKEN. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-1.1 lllRl<SPACE SURVEY REIIARKS: DS-3 ITEMS Il'Ml.VED: l!ARK NJIIIBER LOCATic>>I CQllllOt£NT NAIE EJIIER GEN 1 IJlENINGS U-1 RAD lllN PNL ff r(JT IN IN\/ FILE f ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t ff r(JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 04/26/85

• *
• ttJMN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE 02/27/86 ASSESS1£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A81117 StWIED EQUIP USASE, DISPLAYS, PIIXEIURES NOT ADEQUATE.

tlM ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IND> RESP!MiE. Hf P~ DESCRIPTION: ~T CTRL IF SHARED EQUIP INTERFERES BET Lt.lITS. SHARED EQUIP STATUS r<<JT DISPLAYED IN 00TH. (SEE . RalARKSl 878B PARAGRAPH ruBER: 6.1.J.1.E. l 6.1.J.1.E.2 6.1.3, l.E.5 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IIID/l.lJGRDE EQUIP SO CTRLS CAN 8£ ~INT FR EA, PROVIDE STATUS INDIC FOR EA FOR ALL SHARED. lJl6RDE AJ)IIIIN PROC. fH DISPOSITION: DELETE -SPS IS A Dl.ffl.--LINIT CR -GUIDELINE IS FOR SEPARATE CONTROL ROOfllS

• DATA ClllECTION 1lESCRIPTI[)4 AND CODE Nl.Jll!BER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIAll(S: PI-115, PROB DESC: ADJIIIN PROC !LLOCATING USE IF CTRLS INADEG ITEMS INYILVED: MtlK ftMBER LOCATION COflPOf£NT rM SYST91 SUBSYSTEM ADIIIN PROC H 1'JT IN INV FILE 1 U/15/85

• *
• IUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPWCY REPORT SURRY UNITi CODE B 02/27/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A81191 COf>OENTS ON~ NOT i¥>PRCl>RIAT8..Y/Ct.EARLY LABELED. ENS II -f, IUAI ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPCJEE fff PROIUM DESCRIPTION:

LABELING FOR COlllONENTS IS IN:ORRECT / Ir<<:l)f)l.£TE/IUSSIN6 UN PARAGRAPH OBER: 6. 6. 1. 1 6. 6. 3. 1. A 6. 6. 3. 2. B 6. 6. 3. 2. C SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PERFORIII LABELING SURVEY TO DETERMIN£ LABELING NEEDS/CONCERNS OF OPS, RELABa BOARDS TO 01e e GUIDELINES fff DISPOSITION: PERFORIII STUDY AS RECOIIENDED ABOVE. (METER FACES, CB, ANNIJN TILES) CHECK HIERARC HY, LETIER SIZE, FACE, SPACING. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NUIIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY 11£MRKS: PI-82. fU CR COflPONENTS. ITEMS IfMI.IJED: N\AI< N.MBER LOCATION COlflOr£NT NAIE lHl-133 lJl-191 ff'W FUJI U-1 N ACK PB llJTO ~TV BREMER CXlfRlENTS CT"~ P TV cnrr in TV cm IVS _cnrr S1J1> LV ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t H r<<JT IN INV FILE I ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff l<<JT IN INV FILE t ff l<<JT IN IrN FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN IrN FILE t H r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t SYSIDI SUBSYSTEfll iS/28/85

• *
• HED NO: 2Ml1101 ITEJIIS INVll. lJED: lf.Jfl!AN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNITB IIAAK tullER LOCATION COfl)(MNT SYSTEM 91£R CST LED ff NOT IN UN FILE f EXtAJST FANS ff NOT IN INV FILE* FAIL POSTN ff NOT IN INV FILE f FCY-ES-185 ff NOT IN INV FILE f FCV-ES-116 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* FCV-ES-107A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FCY-ES-1878 ff NOT IN INV FILE* FCV-ES-lasA ff l'(JT IN INV FILE
• FCV-ES-1888 ff NOT IN INV FILE f FI-1-948 ff NOT IN INV FILE* FI-1-943 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FI-1685 BY F ff NOT IN INV FILE f FLASH EVAP P ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 GOV W 4 ff MJT IN INV FILE* !§ANS (SOME) ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 UM HNOT IN INV FILE* LUBE OIL ff NOT IN INV FILE
• l(IRE CW ORIG ff NOT IN INV FILE* NJY-1869A ff NOT IN INV FILE f IOJ-18698 ff NOT IN INV FILE* PDTI PPS ff MJT IN INV FILE f PI-1-444 ff l'<<JT IN INV FILE f PI-1-445 ff riOT IN INV FILE f PI-1-455 ff NOT IN INV FILE f PI-1-456 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PI-1-457 ff l'<<JT IN INV FILE f PI-1-958 ff NOT IN INV FILE f PORV CST LED ff NOT IN INV FILE f P06ER SUPPlY ff MJT IN INV FILE f SUPPLY FANS ff l'<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TOT FI-1-941 ff NOT IN INV FILE f TURB SPD SEN ff NOT IN INV FILE f TV STATUS ff NOT IN INV FILE f ll-2 w Ul.S ff NOT IN INV FILE* YIT BUS PWR ff NOT IN INV FILE* I 'if2./27/86 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• HED NO TITLE tiJMAN ENiINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT@ CODE 28Aell02 WllC>>ENT LABELING USES~ TERMS, ABBREVIATICNS, sma.s. ERROR: IIBJlY/ERROR IN CP RESP(N;E, Hf PROa.EJII DESCRIPTION:

r£W COIII' LABEL.HE USING TEClfHCR. TERMS/ABBREV IMF~ILIAR TO CPS. UN PARAGRAPH NlJll!BER: ~~15 SLG:iESTED BACKFIT: 02/27/86 ASSESSl4ENT. LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE w.PLT @7/11/85 RELAIU COf!PS ON BB VB USINi ADPIIN PROC FOR USE OF ABBREVS/ACRONYl!iS, DISPOSITI~: DELETE -REFER TO PI-82 (20A811@1) FOR SEHERIC LABEL.INS STUDY, DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE M.JIIIBER: TP-6,1 LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY Ra!ARKS: PI-83 I TENS INVCl. VED: !ARI< fUIIIER LOCATI~ CCNflC>>ENT NM:: "1111.00IC PN. VENT PML H r<<JT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t SYSIDI SUBSYST91

• *
• HUMN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CO~ A 'lic./27/86 ASSESS1'1£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPIMIBILITY STATUS DATE 2Wl136 I~TE ~RACTER SIZE. EN6 II IU!AH ERROR: R£ADIN6 ERRORS. I 1H PROBLEM DESCRIPTI~:

~R SIZE FOR DISPI.AY VALL£S IS INADE~TE 1,125*) FOR EXPECTED VIEWil'E DISTAtCE !APP ROX. 8 1 l. fff 87N PARASRAPH M.JNBER: 6.5.1.3.A SU66£STED BACKF1T: INCREASE CHARACTER SIZE TO ,4* -.6" DISPOSITI~: Ell/IP BEitE REl(JVED, REPLACED BY INTEGRATED CORE COOLINSSYSTEJII. CRDR WILL I . . r,lUT TO ICC SYSTEM DESIBN. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION CODE Nl.fflBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRl<S: E-29 ITEMS Itf.Al.VED:

• IRK tull!ER L.OCATI~ CDIPONENT

,-SYSTEM SUBSYSTE/11 CORE COO. "4 ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 "6/U/85

• *
• tlJNAN EN6lN£ERIN6 DISCRE?ArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT8 CODE B HED NO TITLE 28A81143 COIPCIENT LABELS ARE NOT SPECIFIC.

IUAN ERROR: DELAYED DECISION. fH PAOIUJII DESCRIPTION: fff Tl£ 00 CCJlll)(MNT LABELS "TRANSFER SWITCH" ARE NOT SPECIFIC. 8718 PARAGRAPH NIJIBER: 6.6. 3. 5 SU36ESTED BACl<FIT: l()DIFY ~T LABELING OR US£ DEJIIARCATION/COLOR C0DIN6. DISPOSITION: REFER TO Pl-82 (20A81181l LABELINS STUDY *. DATA ctUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJIIIBER: TP-6.1 *LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY DS-28. (J~ ROTARY SELECT SWITCHES> I TENS INUO.. \/Elh IIAIIK MJIIIER LOCATII:* COfllOM:NT NAIE SYSTBI l()T SHTDhW H r<<lT IN INY FILE 1 i2./27/86 ASSESS~T LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -6 (57/11/85 SUBSYSTBI

• *
• TITLE 1tM EN6IN£ERIN; DISCREPArCV REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 28Atll48 I.NECESSARY IhfORMATI<J4 LABELS. ltJllN ERROR: NI!UAD n£ !PERATOR AS TO Tl£ FUrCTION (f" Tt£ BLOCK SWITCH. tH PROaEN DESCRIPTION:

PRZR LYL SI NJ l.OtEER \qID AND SHW.D BE R0Kl'v'ED FR<>>! THE LABEL. 171N PARAGRAPH l'Uti!ER:

6. 5.1.1. C Sl&ESTED IIACl<FIT:

02./27/86 ASSESSPIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 II -6 07/11/85 DilN6E LABELS TO READ: "LO PRZR PRESS SI ACT TRAIN A tlOCK", "LO PRZR PRESS SI ACT TRAIN B BLOCK" lff DISPOSITI~: REFER TO LABEL STUDY PI-82 (2iA01111l. DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ ,:WO CODE l'Uti!ER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: VC-391. "LO PRZR PRESS & LYL SI ~T TRAIN A !Bl BLOCK" I IDIS I NYll. l.{I): MARK NJlll9ER LOCATI~ NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM SEE REMARKS FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAfl SYSTEl'I I SIX.AT! ON VALVES

• *
• EhSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 0 ClJDE C 83/17/86 ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPC*SIBILITY STATUS DATE * -----------------------
• -----~1201 OJT-oF-SERVICE EQUIPIENT r<<IT DE-ENERGIZED, r<<IT T~ IXJT IN CR .._ ERROR: ENER6IZIN6 EQUIMNT T~T IS TIO.Bil TO BE DE-ENERGIZED ffl PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION:

II -7 DIA. PWR SUPPLY EQUIP, WHEN ClJT-oF-SERVICE, FRElllNTLY DOES r<<IT BOTH SUPPLIES DE-EHER SIZED OR TA66ED OUT 8700 PARAGRAPH fOIBER: 6.6.5,l.D SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: IMPROV£ PROCEDURES FOR PUlCIN6 EQUIPMENT OOT-Of'-SERVICE, JtQ.UDIN6 TAS-ClJT PROC£DURES ffl DISPOSITION: PERSONNEL SAFETY ~IDERATION. REVIEW EXISTING ADI'! PROCAND LIPSRADE AS NECESSARY DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fUIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATI~ AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-86 I TEl'IS I NVO... \JED: LOCATION COMPONENT NAIi£ SYSTEM SUBSYST91 TA66IN6-0JT H r<<IT IN INV FILE t 83/17/86

• *
• llA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/27/86 SURRY UNIT8 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A81215 I~TE como.. AND DISPUIY 6RllPIN6.

ENS II -6 HJIAN ERROR: DELAY IN !PERATIN6 CQNTR(l..S. fff PROll.EJI DESCRIPTION: SllE IIENTIL CTRLS ON COMIN PNL, OTl£RS END ~IT VERTPN.S -PARTICULAR PROB W/ cnrr Pl.JR 6E FL !URS ON I.WIT l 1781 PARAGRAPH N.lflBER:* 6.8.2,l,A.2 SU66£STED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CONTAil'flENT PURSE FL!M PETERS AND CONTROLS TO CO/lllllON PANEL, fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-117-3, REDESISN OOX. VENTILATION PAt£L DATA CD..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION E-4 ITBIS INYll.\(lh MIIK NJISER LOCATION COlllOt£NT PM YENTIL CTRLS H NJT IN HN FILE 1 SYSTEM / SUBSYSTEM eJo/17/85 \

• HED NO TITLE IUIAH ENGINEERING DISCRmWCY REPORT SURRY l.WIT 8 CODE B 29A01216 NO LAMP TEST ERROR: INABILITY TO ASSESS SYSTEMS STATUS. MISINTERPRETATION CF SYS TBI STATUS. fff PROIUJII DESCRIPTION:

Hf t<<J LAMP TEST FOR LEGEND LJSHTS/SWITCHES OR INDICATOR LIGHTS. 1700 PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER:

6. 4. 3. 3. c. 1 6. 5.3. l, A. 2 SUSGESTED BACl<FIT:

INSTALL UVilP TEST CAPABILITY -SEE r()RTH FOR INSTRI.CTICWS. DISPOSITION: 83/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -6 93/17/.86

• INVESTIGATE FOR LAA? TEST FUNCTION ~y SAFETY SYSTEMS WITH LEGEND LIGHTS THAT HA VE SINSLE BULBS IN> THAT ARE NOT NOM.L Y LIT, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~

CODE l'UIBER: TP-1, 7 MAINTAINABILITY SURVEY REJIIARKS: E-39. AU. INTERMU.Y-LISHTED COfl>ONENTS !EXCEPT IHU4S) ITE"9 INVOLVED: LOCATION COPl)()NENT NAfl£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM SEE REMARKS FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAM SYSTEfll ISCUITION YR..VES *

• *
• HUl'iAN ENSINEERINS DISCRmWCY REPORT 02/27/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE A ASSESB,ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2Wll1385 U¥:K CF IDARCATION LINES KM ERIE!h , ~YED/IN:ORRECT OPERATOR REPCWSE. Ht PROll.EJI DESCRIPTII*:

IIBIARCATICJI LINES t<<:IT USED CJI HJT PANEL. 9711 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.6. 6. 2. A St&ESTED BACKFIT: II -5 DalARC t()T SHOWN PNL aill!INATil',1; NEED FOR O~/PtJRPLE TAPE/ARR!Mi US£D TO ASSOCIATE CTR!.. SWTD£S W/ PROC CTRLS fff DISPOSITION: IEAIOTE I ADD COLOR PATOfES AS ON l!'ICB. TAPE IS TO BE RE~ l REPLACED W/ ORA N6E I PURPLE CQ..OR DOTS ON LABEL. COORDIANTE WITH 1.2-4-6 122A02'~l. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIII.BER: TP-6. 1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-16 ITEJIIS ItMl..VED: IIARK UBER LOCATION l:()lf)()f8T NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII IIBIARC LitES H t<<:IT IN INV FILE t 11/11/85

• *
• ltJA EN6It£.ERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT ~/27/Sh SURRY UNIT9 CODE B . ASSESSJIIENT LAST REVIEW l£D t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A1311 INCIJR.ETE ST~RDIZATION Al(JN6 PAfELS IF ~ITS 1 AND 2. IUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJ> RESP(WSE.

IM:REASED RELIAta ON IEfllRY. IN CREASED TRAININ6 TIJIIE. 1t1 PRO!l.£JI DESCRIPTION: ENG II -6 ARRANEENT, LOCATION & 11£SIBN IF AMO TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, l.ABEI.S NJT ST~IZED FORS UIILAR PN.S CF EA ~IT 1788 PARAGRAPH NJIIBER: 6.8.2.4.A SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: USIN6 THE LIST PROVIDE STANDARDIZATION FOR SIIULAR FUM:TIONS AS APPROPRIATE. fH DISPOSITION: DIFFEREFCES IN LABEi.INS BET ~ITS WILL BE HANDLED BYLABELINS STUDY PI-82 <20 Alllll>, ANY DIFF BET CREMRKSI DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.JflBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION IIEJIIARl(S: DS-29 DISP:!MITS DUE TO SYS DIFF tiWE BEEN DELETED. ITEMS INYCx.UED: 111111< NllllER LOCATION COIIOfENT AE SYSTEM . SUBSYSTEJII SEE ORIS l£D ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t 16/97/88

• *
• IOJIN EN6Ir£ERIN6 DISCREAA'CY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 02/27/86 ASSESSIENT I.AST REVIEW HED Ill TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A1312 ll<<nl>LETE STANDARDIZATI~

AIOE PAr£LS CF UNITS 1 AND 2. ttllAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CP REsm.sE. Ir<<:REASED RELIArCE ON JIEORY, IN CIIEASED TRAININ3 TIii:. Hf PAOIUJII IIESCRIPTI~: II -7 AR~, LOCATI~ & D£SI~ OF ANO TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS t()T ST!NJARDIZED FOR S IMILAR Pfl.S OF EA I.NIT 1718 PARAGRAPH fOIBER1 6,8.2.4.A 9J86ESTEil BACKFIT: USIPE THE LIST PROVIDE STINJARDIZATION FOR SHULAR FUNCTIONS AS ~PROPRIATE. fff DISPOSITI~i REARRAN6E UNIT 1 !£TEA TO MATCH THOSE IN ~IT 2. DATA ctUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION RalM<S: DS-29-67 ( 1 > ITBIS INVll.YED: IA~ tOl!ER LOCATI~ COIIRJENT rWE FI-1-122A PI-1-121 ff t()T IN INY FILE t ff lllT IN IPN FILE t SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII '116/07/85

• tllMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT 0 CODE B 03/20/86 ASSESSfllENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---

2A1313 INCOMPLETE STANDARDIZATI~

AMONG PANELS OF UNIT 1 AND 2, HI.IP'iAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OP RESPONSE, INCREASED RELIANCE ON MEl'ORY. IN CREASED TRAINING TIIE. Hf PROBWI DESCRIPTION: EN6 II -6 ARRANGEIIIENT, LOCATION & DESIGN OF ANNUN TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS NOT STANDARDIZED FORS IIIIILAR PNLS IF EA UNIT 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6. 8,2,'+,A SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: USING THE LIST PROVIDE STANDARDIZATION FOR SI"ILAR FUNCTIONS AS APPROPRIATE. DISPOSITION: REARRANGE STATUS LTS IN UNIT 2 TO IIIATCtl THOS* IN UNIT 1, (ENSURE WORDING MATCHES Al.SO). REFER TO PI-69 120A02303l

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: DS-29-F9 !TOO INVOLVED:

fllARI< NUMBER LOCATION COMPONENT NAl'IE SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEM STATUS LTS ff NOT IN INV FILE

• 03/17/86
• *
• ti.IA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 02./27/86 SURRY ~IT0 CODE C ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW t£D t<<) TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29Ai1314 Ir<<:CNlLETE ST!ldlARDIZATICW "8E PAIELS IF ~ITS 1 AND 2, ltR ERROR: ~Y/ERAOR IN CP R£SPCWSE.

Ir<<:REASED RELIAfCE ON flDJRY. IN CREASED TRAINING TIIIE. fff PROa.91 .DESCRIPTION: EN6 111-9 ARRANE£NT, LOCATION I DESIGN IF IMO TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS t()T ST~IZED FOR 5 Ifill.AR PNI..S CF EA um 1718 PA~~: 6.8.2,4.A SUSGESTED BACl<FIT: USIN6 THE LIST PROVIDE ST!NlARDIZATION FOR SIIIILAR FLJrCTIONS AS APPROPRIATE. lff DISPOSITION: REARRANSE 6 THlllB ROTARIES ON UNIT 1 TO MTCH nm CJ4 lNIT 2. DATA ctl.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE l'UIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION IEWl<S1 ~J9 ITEMS IfMl. VED: IIARK tUllER LOCATI~ C(lll()£NT rAE ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff NlT IN INV FILE 1 H t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE I ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<rr IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM / SUBSYSTEM tfJ/17/85

• *
• IUIAN ENiINEERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 02./27/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ASSESSIIENT LAST REVIEW 1£1) It) TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28A81J15 Ir<<:Oll>LETE ST~RDIZATI~

AfOE ~S CF I.WITS 1 AND 2, IUW4 ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJl RESP(NlE. Ir<<:REASED RELHKE flEl()RY, IN CREASED TRAINING TIIE. fH PROll9I DESCRIPTI~: II -7 ARRAtliEIENT, LOCATI~ & DESISN IF ANO TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS NlT ST~IZED FOR S IIIILAR PN.S CF EA Ltm 8781 PARA6RAPH ttff!BER: 6.8.2.4.A SU86ESTED BACl<FIT: USIN6 THE LIST PROVIDE ST~IZATION FOR SUIILAR FUtCTIONS AS APPROPRIATE. fff DISP0SITI~1 DWfE R.ARfl LIGHTS TO RED ISEE PASE 15 FOR LISTJ ON I.MIT 2 TURBirE SUPERVIS ORY PAIEL, ~TA co..LECTil)f DESCRIPTil)f AND CODE fUIBER: TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ REIWIKS1 DS-29-Jll 11 ITEIIS ItMl.Wh MIi< fUIER LOCATil>>f C(Jll)(J£NT 1¥.ARN LIGHTS H l'CIT IN INV FILE f SYSIDI SUBSYSIDI 11/30/86

• *
• ttJMN ENSIN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86 SURRY IT @ CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ---------------------*----

---

2A1316 INCOfllPLETE ST/rIDARDIZATI~

~NG Pf:WELS OF UNITS 1 AND 2, HlM ERROR:-DELAY/ERROR IN OP RESPONSE. IfCREASED RaIANCE ON IEPIORY. IN CREASED TRAINING TIME, fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: ENS II -6 ARRANSEl'IENT, LOCATION l DESIGN OF ANNUN TILES, CTRLS, DISPS, LABELS NOT STANDARDIZED FORS Il'1LAR PNLS OF EA ~Ii 87110 PARAGRAPH tO'.BER: 6.8.2.;,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: USING THE LIST PROVIDE ST~RDIZATION FOR SIMILAR FUNCTIONS AS APPROPRIATE. ffl DISPOSITION: CHANGE RC'~ LISHT ON UNIT 2 TO YELLOW LISHT FOR "E).ERG SEN 12 TRIP AUX RESET BUTT ~*. CHANGE LABELING ALSO. COORDINATE WITH PI-62 120003033)

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M.J!'.BER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REfllRKS: DS-29-Hl (2) I IDIS INVOL. VED: MRI< NIJIIIBER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAfi!E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEI': HNOT IN INV FILE t 03/17/86

• *
• EltiINEERlrE DISCIIEPM:V REPORT SURRY ~IT8 aJDE 02/27/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW l£D N) TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A02111 DISPU\YS TOO UM Mt£1.S. . l'OE aM>L.T KNlN ERROR: IBOirE ERRORS LEADirE TO ERRORS IN CCMRCl. ~TIYATION tH PlUl.91 DESCRIPTION: OBSCURE DISPLAYS PtXED LOW ON VERTI~ ~S, CJ>£RATORS llJST L£AN OCROSS 00A RDS FOR READINGS 8718 NJIIIBER:

6,1,2.5.B SU66ESTED BACKF IT: !()YE Dl~VS TO HI9£R POSITION FOR EASY R£ADirE OR REPOSITION DESK/CONSOi.£ HIGHER FOR Ill NITORING. 1H DISP0SITION1 REFER TO 1£Dt1,2-4 122A83039>

• DATA CCllECTI!l4 DESCRIPTI!l4 1M) CODE OBER1 TP-1,2 ANTH~RICS SURVEY R91All{S:

PI-28, YIEWIN6 DATA FR(JI YERIF. ITBIS IrMl. VEIi: MIi< N.NIER LOCATION COl!POfENT NAIE CR-ss-ell CR-SS-281 ELEC INTSRTR FC'HN-287 FCV-fW-25l1A FCY-fW-c5IB SW IDIP RCRD H NJT IN INY FILE f H NJT IN INV FILE 1 H NJT IN INY FILE 1 H t<<JT IN INV FILE I H NJT IN INV FILE f H NJT IN INY FILE 1 H t<<JT IN lffJ FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 91/97/85

• *
• l£D NO ENJIN£ERlN6 DlSC~Y REPORT SURRY t.tme CODE TITLE 2IAl2ll2 DISPUYS LOCATED TOO HIGH 114 PAfELS tUIAN ERIDI 1 JEL.AY OR ERROR IN O>ERATOR RESP!lEES 1H PROa.91 I1ESCRIPTION1 rl/27/86 ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW RESP04SIBILITY STATUS DATE 91/97/85 IIJST USE STCXl. TO READ DISPLAYS LOCATED TOO HIGH 114 PANELS TO AVOID PA~X AND Ii.AR£ fH 1788 PARAGRAPH IUIBER: 6.1.2. 5. B Sl&ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE DISPt.AYS TO LOWER LOCATION DISPOSITI~:

REFER TO 1. 2-4 (22A03039>

• DATA cw.ECTIIJ4 DESCRIPTI~

AND COD£ N.JIBER1 TP-1.2 ANTHROPOETAICS SURVEY 1E'Aft(S1 PI-21. VIEWIN6 DATA FIOI VERIF. IT91S INV(L',tDs MARK NJIIER LOCATION CClflPOrENT JM SYSTEM a.JS 1 BUS 2 a.JS 3 BUS 4 EL£C BUS \/LT FI-2-474 FI-2-475 FI-2-476 FI-2-4n LI-2-921 LI-2-922 H NJT IH INV FILE t ff MlT IN INV FILE* ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t LM417 IETER MAIN STEAM SYSID LAB417 PETER IIIAIN STEAi'I SYSIDI H l'<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t ~1 IETER SAFETY INJECT!~ SYSIDI NABJel IETER SAFETY INJECT!~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII lm.JIIIULATORS ACCUltJLATORS

• ltJIIIAN ENSINEERI,E DISCREPiKY REPORT VJ2127/&6 SURRY UNITI t£D J<<l 1 28A82N2 IT01S INYCLVED:

~tOl£R LOCATICJI COffflENT tAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM Ll-2-924 r<<Jel METER SAFETY INJECTI~ SYSTEM ACWU.ATORS LI-2-926 METER INJECTI!14 SYSTEM ACrutl.ATORS LI-2-928 NAB3l2 IETER SAFETY INJECTICJI SYSTEM ~TORS LI-2-938 NAC382 IIETER SAFETY INJECTICl4 SYSTEM ACOJU.ATORS LI-cs-291 NAA388 METER COOAINIENT SPRAY SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD PWR SlP INST ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t AR-RN!H32 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t RR-RIE-133 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t TI-2-133 LM317 METER REACTOR CCXl.ANT (PRIMRY LOOP, PWRl SYS REACTOR COOLANT~ TI-2-411B LAC413 IETER REACTOR COOLANT <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-2-412A LAB414 PIETER REACTOR CCXl.ANT IPRIMRY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-4128 LM414 METER REACTOR coo.ANT (PRIIIIARY UXP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-421B NAC413 METER REACTOR coo.JlNT IPRIMRY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-422A NAB414 METER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-4228 NM414 METER REACTOR COil.ANT (PRIMRY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-2-431B C¥1C413 IETER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD

• TI-2-432A

~14 lllETER REACTOR coo..ANT IPRIMRY LOOl, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-43211 ()lA414 METER REACTOR coo.ANT (PRI~RY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-fC-283 l.AB.315 METER FUEL PIT COO.ING SYSTEJ!! SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD YI-VNS-2NA NAA319 IETER fllAIN S~ SYSTEM PRESSURIZER YI-YMS-2818 Nm319 IETER IIIAIN STEAM SYSTEM PRESSURIZER YI-IJNS-2NC NAC319 JETER IIIAIN S~ SYSTEJII PRESSURIZER YI-YNS-281A NAA329 IETER MIN STEAM SYSTEM PRESSURIZER YI-\INS-211 B ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t YI-YNS-291C tt t()T IN INV FILE t *

• *
• It.A OOINEERINS DISCREPIKY REPORT 'iJc./27/86 SURRY UNITI CODE A ASSESSIENT

~T REVIEW t£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tA828l3 IU.TISCA.E INDICATORS t(JT IJIERATI[NUY BBEFICI~ TO CPERATORS. IUIAH ERROR: NAY~ D£LAY/ERROR IN IPERATOR RESP!N,E FIOI INABILITY TO VERIFY OR IOITOR PAl9£TERS. fff PROll.91 DESCRIPTICII: EN6 II -S UTISCIU INDICATORS AR£ l<<JT B8EFICI~ TO IPERATORS. SCUS ARE ~INS. OPS. PREFER 0 NE-TIHJE RELATIOEHIP 1788 PARAGRAPH tulBER: 6.S.l.S.F 9J66ESTED BACKFIT: POSSIBLY SPLITIN6 llJT IIJLTiroti INDICATOR TO CONTAIN M NEEDLE PER SC~ DISPOSITI~: CODE SCIU TO INDICATE PEN/SOU RELATIONSHIP, COORDitflTE WITH JP-16 (22A82409l

• DATA cw.ECTICII DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE OBER: TP-5. l DISPtAYS SURVEY ~S: PI-74-1. ITEMS IfML IJED: NARI< N.111ER LOCATICII CDIO£NT rAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TI RECORDERS ff NJT IN INV FILE t / 81/12/86

• * ** IUAI EN6INEERirE DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE B W27/86 ASSESS,ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCIEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IAl2ll4 POINTER VISIBILITY IS POOR~ sal.ES. 11M ERROR1 MY DUE IPERATOR READifE ERRORS DUE TO POOR CONTRAST AND T t£ tEIQffS IF SCME IETERS. 1H PROllBI DE!K:RIPTI!lt:

ENS III-7 CAtNJT READ POSITI!lt INDICATI!lt t,i !DUS, POOR CONTRAST 8ETWE£N axK POINTERS/IUO< sal. E aJflQJRATIIJ6. 1718 PAIIASRAPH !UBER: 6.5.2.2.C QJ66ESTED BACl<FIT: IIEPIA'.:E BUO< POINTERS INDICATORS WITH RED POINTERS. DISPOSITION: IIEPUWENT IETERS WILL BE SPECIFIED TO KlYE RED POINTERS. EXISTINS a.R::K POINTE RS ARE DI!K:ERNAll.E. DATA cw.ECTI!lt DESCRIPTI~ CODE ~R1 TP-5. l DISPt.AYS SURVEY *AEMAl<S1 PI-75. ITEMS INYCLYED: U YERTICI¥-IETERS I~> ITEJIIS INIJ[l.~1 fM< MJNSER LOCATI~ CDIIOtENT tM: SYSIDI H NJT IN INV FIL£* SUBSYSTEM 11/11/85

• *
• l£D NO TITLE Hl.lfl94 EN6INEERI~

DISCREPIKY REPORT SURRY lMITt CODE B 28A82N5 REOOIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS ARE IUSSIMJ FD CR. tfMW ERROR: , MAY~ DELAYS/ERRORS INIJ>ERATOR R£SPIME IX£ TO I.HlVAILA BILITY CF REOOIRED INSTRtJENTATICN. fff PROBlal DESCRIPTION: t2/28/86 ASSEss.-ENT LAST REVIEW RESP!JEIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -6 11/11/85 IU. YISlR. DISPLAYS AND INDICATION NECESSARY TO l£ET TASK REllJIREBTS ARE NOT PRESENT IN Tl£ CR. 1780 PARAGRAPH rutBER: 6. 1.1.1. A 6. 5. 1. 1. B 6. 5. 1.1. E 6. 5. 4.1. 6 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE CR WITH THE VISIA. DISPLAY AND INDICATIONS LISTED. DISPOSITI0N1 PROVIDE CR WITH DISPLAYS LISTED ON BACK CF THIS FOHN

• DATA co..LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-n-1. <SEE C-20 (22AIJ2e6ll. ITEMS INY(l. VED: IARK NJl!ER LOCATI~ C()l)l)£NT IA£ .ec tt> TK LIil. .ec PRESS IND CORE COO.I~ EXC LETDN FL INCORE T/C i.N STN EFLNT Pel. BLD-D IF RCS BOR aK IIEJIJTE STAND S6 BlWDN RM TB OIL BERT ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff tfJT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff tflT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff tflT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE

• ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM
• *
• It.A EN6INEERitE DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT SURRY LNITI COif A VJc./28/86 ASSEss,ENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPCNSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21Alt2115 Ill.TI~ INDICATORS NOT CJIERATICMLY BENEFICI!l.

TO CJIERATORS. ti.A ERRCHI: DELAY /ERROR IN CJ) RESPOEE * .._ PROaEM DESCRIPTICIC: TRG II -5 IU. TISCU: RECORDERS ARE NOT BEIEFICI~ TO CPERATORS. sal.£5 ARE cnFUSitE. CPS PREFER H -TD-<JE: RELATI~IP. ... 1710 PARAGRAPH ttER: 6. 5.1. 5.F SU66ESTED BIO<FIT: POSSIILY SPlIITitf:l 00T lt.11..TISCU: RECORDERS TO CONTAIN H NEEili PER SCIU. DISPOSITION: TRAIN OP£RATORS TO US£ TREND RECORDERS FOR TRENDitf:l !RY AND USE INDICATORS FOR READIN6 RBl. TIIE WM.LES. DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION i:wD CODE NJIIIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRKS: PI-74-2. ITEMS INYCl.\tn: NJIBER LOCATION COfP(J£NT N¥E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM HNOT IN INV FILE t 81/30/86

• *
• 11.R EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAN:V REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY ~ITI CO[( A ASSESSMENT

~T REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A12116 111.TISCfU INDICATORS t<<JT CJlERATICJA.l.Y BENEFICIIL TO CJ>S. tullN ERmR1 DELAY/ERROR IN fP RESPONSE. Ht Pm.Ell DESCRIPTIC>>o TRS II -5 IU.Tlsal.E IEaJRDERS ARE l<<JT BEHEFICHl. TO IPERATORS. SCll.E S ARE COFUSIN6. CJ>S PREFER E-TIHI£ REUITICNHIPS 17N PARA6RMi N.MBER: 6.5.1.5.F SU6l£STED BACKFIT: POSSlll.Y SPUTTirE llJT IU.TISCILE REaJRDERS TO CONTAIN ONE NE&E PER SCILE. Ht DISPOSITION: sau/PEN RELATIONSHIPS AR£ CURRENTLY CODED. INITIATE JOB PERFON<<:E f£ASURE TO READ IU. TISOU RECORDERS. DATA allECTICW DESCRJPTI~ CODE N.IIIBER:

• TP-5. 1 DISPt..AYS SURVEY RBIARKS: Pl-74-5, 7,8. ITEMS INV!l.lJED ARE ILL REaJRDERS.

ITEMS IfMl.lJED1 fM< tUIIER . LOCATICW aJl>MNT tM B ~R RCADR LIIIJID WASTE PROCESS VENT RWST ff t<<JT IN INV FIL£* ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ I ff t<<JT IN INV FIL£* ff t<<lT IN UN FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM 11/38/86

• *
• HUIAI EtEINEERIN6 DISCREPKY R£PORT SURRY LMITII CODE B e2/28/86 ~ss,or LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCJelBILITV STATUS DATE 21A12117 Ill.TI~ INDICATORS NOT IJ>ERATIIHUY BBEFICHl.

TO CIIERATORS, ltM ERRORz DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESPCNlE. Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~: II -7 .U.TISC"-E INDICATORS ARE NOT BENEFICUl. TO CPERATORS. SCIUS ARE COFUSIN6. CPS PREFER E-TO-<lE RELATI!HliIP 1780 PARA6RAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.5.1,5.F SU6GESTED BACKF IT: POSSIBLY SPLITTING ClIT llll.TISC$U INDICATOR TO CONTAIN CN: NEEDLE PER SC$U, DISPOSITI!t4: CODE LE6END PLATE TO SHIJ4 CHllf£L/sati RELATIONSHIP, REFER TO LABELING STUDY PE R PI-82 t2eA&l191), DATA CO..UCTIC* 11£SCRIPTI~ AND CODE tUIBER: TP-5. l DISPLAYS SURVEY AEJIAIIKS1 Pl-74-11. ITEMS ll'Ml.VED: NAIi< IOIIER LOCATII* COIIJO£NT tM TUIIB VIS REC ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM / 11/38/86

• *
• tUAI ENSINEERIN; DISCREPIW:Y REPORT SURRY Ltml co~ B . 82/28/86 ASS*SSIEHT LAST REVIEW l£D t<<l TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAl2835 REIIJIRED DISPl.AYS AND INDICATI!Je IUSSINJ FR!JI CR. II -6 17/11/85 KM ERROR: 11£LAY/ERROR IN a> RESPOE£. ffl PRmL0I DESCRIPTIClh ll.l. Yist.K DISPLAYS AND INDICATI~

tECESSARY TO IEET TASK REIIJIR0EHTS ARE t<<lT PRESENT IN TI£ CR. 1710 PARAS~ rtJIIIBER: 6.1.1, 1, A 6. 5. 1, 1, B 6. 5.1.1, E 6. 5. 4. 1. 6 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE CR WITH Tl-£ YISIA. DISPlAY AND INDICATIONS LISTED, ffl DISPOSITI~: . FOR FLOW CONTRCllERS LISTED ADD DI6ITAL INDICATION (RED AND GREEN LIGHTS)

• DATA CCllECTI~

DESCRIPTION AND~ UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATIOH TP-5.1 DISPl.AYS SURVEY ~RKS: PI-n-2. ITEJIIS INYn.VED: tollER LOCATION OOllOfENT PM SYSTEM FCV-2122 FCY-2161 FCY-2615 FCY-QHN FC'HW-111 i<<:V-21~ ICY-2186 i<<:V-2756 1£V-LW-184A ~1148 PCV-2145 RAA914 PROCESS CONTRW.ER D£l11Ial. AND YCLIJ£ IXWTRa.. SYSTEM DAB125 PROCESS CONTRW.ER D£lll1CA. AND VCl.lJE CCJ4TRO.. SYSTEM BAAU 7 PROCESS CONTRW.ER RESIDlR. !£AT REPIMl. SYSTEM QMl57 PROCESS CONTRCl.LER 6AS WASTE RADIOOCTIIIE SYSTEM QA8857 PROCESS CONTRW.ER 6AS WASTE RADIOOCTIIIE SYSTEM DAA116 PROCESS CONTRW.ER RESIDlR. IEAT REJIKMl. SYSTEM DAA124 PROCESS CONTRCllER C1£Mlal. AND YWJIE CONTR!l. SYSTEM DAA115 PROCESS CONTRCU.ER RESIDlR. !£AT~ SYSTEJII OAA851 PROCESS CONTRCU.ER GBAl51 PROCESS ~TRW.ER ff NJT IN INY FILE* SUBSYSTEM CHARGIN; SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD !ECTOR cm.JWT PIJl>S SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD

• It.A ENSINEERIN3 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY LWIT8 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPIMIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAl2t36 DISPtAY TOO HISH. tlM ~R: READING ERRORS. fff PROllDI DEOCRIPTIC>>h I DISPLAY IOl(TED TOO HI9i FOR lm.JRATE READINi (79 1 IFF DECIO. "7N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.1.2.5.B Sl&ESTED ~IT: CPERATIOtA./ENSINEERIN6 STUDY TO DETERMINE FEASIBILITY CF RELOCATINi DISPUIY. fff DISP0SITIC*1 DME TO MTRS W/ L.AR6ER £1:IUS. IIIPROVE sa¥-E RA'6E TO OCCOODATE FULL FLCM. TI LT FORWARD TO Ilil>ROVE RBi>ING. DATA cru.ECTICII DESCRIPTICII IWD CODE N.11&:R: TP-9. 2 ~RIFICATI~

i:r.D Wl.IDATI~ IEIARKSI £-23. !PERATOR COIIENT DURING SURVEY. ITENS INYCl.VEJh ftllllER LOCATICII CCJll()ENT JAE FI-YS-116 FI-YS-119 SYSTEM ~ILATICII SYSTEJII VENTILATI~ SYSTB! SUBSYSTEM II -6 06/af./85

• llJA EN6INEERIN3 DI!l:REPIKY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE 82./28/86 ASSEss.ENT

~T REVIEW TITLE RESPIJEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2837 I~/CIN=USINi DISPLAY WI.I.ES. COIIIPLT II.NIH ERROR: READIN3/aJNERSI~ ERRORS. lff PfQl.91 IeCRIPTI~: ~TOR REPORTED T~T DISPLAYED VALLES REIIJIRE IDT~ CDNERSI~ TO PERFOIII IJIERATI~ 1718 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.5.1.2..B SU66ESTED BfDFIT: PERFOIII IJIERATI~ STUDY TO DETEIIIINE APPROPRIATE DISPUlY WI.LES -l()DIFY la0RDIN6I.Y. lff DISPOSITICN: REFER CNDSR COVERED PI-72 (21A82202l. DELETE~RaR. FILTERS W/IN NOii! CONVENTI NOT ADVISABLE NES XFR DATA CXllECTI~ DE!l:RIPTI~ AND CODE tUIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATICN AND "'"-IDATI~ AEMRKSI £-2-4. OPERATOR COMNT DURING SURVEY. ITBIS IrMl.VEDa -flARK ftJfllER LOCATI~ C()ll()£NT NAME PIC-YS-117A PIC-YS-1178 PHN-UUA PR-OHl1B ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INY FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM 16/17/85

• *
• 2IAl2l38 OBSCURED DISPLAY POINTER. 11.R ERROR: READIIE ERlllR. Hf PROa.£111 DESCRIPTI~:

ltJIW EN6INEE11Itfi DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNITI COIE TITLE POINTER Cf DISPLAY IS OBSCURED BY BEZa. lff UN PARASIW'H IUIBER: 6. 5. 2. 2. B Sl.8£STED BACKFIT: CUT~ BEZEL TO REVBl. ENTIRE SCll.E POINTER. DISPOSITI~: 12/28/86 ASSESSIENT ~T REVIEW . RESPCIEIBILITY STATUS DATE C(N)L.T 96/17/85 DELETE-DESPITE A Ml. ~T IF PARIUAX, INDICATORS ARE EASILY READ. ~TI~ REQUIRED. DATA CCUECTIOH DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE IUIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY Ra!A~: E-25, UTEJII INYCl.VED IS CONTR(ll.ER FOR FI-YS-117Bl ITEJIIS HMl.YEDt ,ARK lt.N!ER LOCATI~ mRJENT SYSIDI SUBSYSIDI FI-YS-117B ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t

• *
• ltJIAN ENSINEERIN6 DISl:REPAN:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI COIi: B HED Ml TITLE 28A82l39 WORN DISPLAY SOU:S -TREND RECORDERS 11M ERROR: DISPLAY READING ERIIJRS. "* PR(IUN DESCRIPTI~r TREND RECORDERS~

l<<JRN OR DAIAiED SCSUS. 17N~OBER:

6. 5. 4.1. C SUB6ESTED IW:KFIT: I~ MRS TO REPUU l<<JRN SCll..ES.

"* DISPOSITI~: AS PER MCl<FIT RECOMIENDATIONS~ DATA CCLLECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS QJRVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ ANO VAI..IDATJ(Jj RBIARKS1 E-:2£, DATA cru..ECTI~ FRCII OBSERVATI~. JIDIS JNVQ.VED: NARK tUIIER ux:ATI~ COMPC>>ENT SYSTEM 02/28/86 ASS£55,ENT LAST REVIEW RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE II -6 ~/87/85 SUBSYSTEM FR-2-2548 PR-OHl1A PR-OH81B TR-1-419A TR-2-614 TR-MS-181B TR-MS-111D SAA315 RECORDER ~TOR COOJlHT (PRI~Y LCXP, PWR> SYS ff Pill IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE f ff l<<JT IN INV FILE t SAA314 RECORDER RESIDtR. 1£AT RalMl. SYSIDI ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff f<<JT IN INV FILE t

• *
• 11.JA ENGINEERIN6 DI~Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITI CO~ ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW t£D II) TITLE RESPC1EIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IAl2l4I VERTICR. aLIJINS (F DISPLAYS 11.M ERAOR: DELAY IN SC!Mlfli INDICATORS fff PIUILEJII IIESCRIPTl~I cm ISO w INDICS ARE OR6ANIZ£D IN VERTICll.

COJJINS RAHTER nR4 lflRIZ~T~ ROIS. 1711 PARAGRAPH rtJIIIER: 6.8.3.2..A Sl&ESTED BACl<FIT: t<<J BACKFIT RECOMIENDED: POTENT!~ FOR NESATIYE TRANSFER OF TRAININ6 IS TOO GREAT~ fff DISP0SITI~1 DELETE~ WITH SU66ESTED BACl<FIT

• DATA cru.ECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ CODE UBER: TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION RENARKSI E-43. cm ISO W INDICS TY-BD-280A THAU TY-IA-201B SYSTEM SUBSYSTEN CDR.T FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAi .. SYSTEM Iso.ATION Wl.VES / @6/07/85

• *
• tlR EN6UEERIN6 DISC~ REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY IMIT0 CODE ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW l£D t<<). TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82Ml EXCESSIVE rutBER CF SINIUIR DISPUIYS IN LMRO<EN STAINS. IUA4 ERlllR1 CP ERROR (CPERATICII CF WRH a>>RJENT Ill£ TO SIMILARITY>, fff PROSl.91 DESCRIPTICII:

t<<l DEMRCATICII OR SEPARATic>>4 FOR STRIN6S Cf' DISPLAYS 6REATER Tl-Al 28 1 IN LENiTH, fff UN PARASRMi r<<JIBER1 6.8.3.2.B 6.8.3.2.C SU66ESTED BAO<F IT: DEMRCATE STRINGS DISPOSITICII: DEL£TE-STRIN6 JEl'.\RCATED BY CNm ISO.. Pt& WHICH IS 1¥l?ROP FOR FI.JfC USASE:, FUR TIER IEWE IOU BE CTN=USIN6. DATA allECTICII D£m:RIPTIC11 AND CODE tUIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATICII AND Wl.IDATI()I REJIUIKS: E-44. cm ISO w, IND TV-BD-281A THRU TV-IA, P384 THRU V307 ITENS INVa.YED: NA~ ldllER LOCATICII Cl)l)(N:NT fAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM* C(NJ\.T Fl!A211 Dlm:RETE IIJTARY ~IN STEAIII SYSIDI Isa.ATic>>4 Wl.VES to/17/85

• *
• tU9I EN6INEERIN3 DI~Y REPORT SURRY ~ITI COD£ B e2/28/86 ASSESSIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE ~I BILI TY STATUS DATE 1'1RROR IMASED DISPLAYS tUIAN ERROR: FAIWRE TO LOCATE CORRECT DISPLAY. fff PD.Bl DESCRIPTI~:

ENG .; DISPLAY ARE MIRROR IJIIA6£D. <~ FILTER ()I C(>>llllil VENT~ PIC/FI-VS-117A/Bl 9711 PARA6RAPH NlJIBER: 6.8. 3. J Slll6ESTED eio<FIT: II -7 PROVIDE CODING TO EtffKE DISPLAY RECOOHITI()I. REVERSINSDISPl.AY LOCATIONS NJT RECIJIENDED. fff DISPOSITI~: PROVIDE UIIELS TO EfffN:E DISPLAY RECOOHITI()I-REFER TO LABEIN6 STll>Y PI-82 (28A0 lllll DATA Cll.LECTI()I DE9:RIPTI()I AND CODE tUIBER: FI-YS-117A FI-YS-1178 TI>-9.2 VERIFICATI()I AND \qJDATI()I ff t(IT IN INY FILE t ff t<<lT IN INY FILE t SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM V/6/97/85

• *
• It.A EN6If£ERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY lftIT@ CODE B 02/28/86 ASSES9£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A12M3 REQUIRED DISPlAYS AND INDICATI~

ARE MISSIN6 FIOI CR. tUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESP(N;E. HI PD.EN DESCRIPTI0N1 EN6 I -5 'l.l YISIA. DISPlAYS IWD INDICATION r£CESSARY TO IEE'T TASK REIIJIRBENTS AR£ l<<JT PRESENT IN CR. 17N PARAGRM-1 rul8£R: 6,1,1,1.A 6.5.1,1.B 6.5.1.1.£ 6.5.4.1.6 SOOGESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE CR WITH TI£ VISI.R. DISPLAY /INDICATION LISTED. HI DISPOSITI~: INST/:U INDICATOR LIGHTS !ACTlR..l & FLIII INDICATI~ DATA ro.LECTION DESCRIPTill4 AND CODE rDIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE*!RKS: PI-n-S7. t() HI SAFffi IfllPORT DUE TO WW BACKUP AVAILABILITY ITEMS INYll. \el: -IIARK r<<.JMBER LOCATION COIPOf£NT rM: SYST91 FEED RES BYP H t()T IN INV FIL£ t SUBSYSTEM 85/28/85 ttn1AN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/17/86

• SURRY UNIT 0 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVlEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A02Wt REQUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATI~

ARE fllISSINS FRCJ!ll CR. ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN OP RESPONSE. Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: EN6 VISUAL DISPLAY /INDICATION NECESSARY TO MEET TASK REOOIREl£NTS rm PRES£NT Ik CR. 07"9 PARAGRAPH NUl'.BER: 6.1.1. l,A 6.5.1.1,B 6._S.1.1. E 6.5.4.1,G SUSSESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE CR WITH VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION LISTED

• DISPOSITION:
• LOW CONSEQ'JENCE OF ERROR DUE TO SECONDARY INDICATIONS

~PARAMETER STATUS. INSTAL L INDIC LTS FOR ACTUAL W STATUS DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N'J~R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND_ VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REfilARl<S: PI-77-58 ITOO INVOLVED: MARK N.MBER DECAY 1£AT tCV-fllS-204

• LOCATION COPIPONENT NAAE SYSTEM H rm IN INV FI_LE f CAB213 PROCESS CONTROLLER MAIN STEA/II SYSTBI SUBSYSTEJII I -5 03/17/86
• ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY IT 0 CODE A 03117/BS ASSESS1ti£NT

~T REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~S REGUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS ARE MISSING FROM CR. IOIAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJ) RESPONSE. tff PROBL9! DESCRIPTION:

• tff VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION NECESSARY TO MEET TASK RElhJIREl!IENTS NOT PRESENT IN CR. 0790 PARAGRAl1H NUMBER: 6.1.1.1.A 6.S.1.1.B 6;5.1.1.E 6.S.4.1.G SU66ESTED BACl<FlT:

PROVIDE CR WITH VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION LISTED

• DISPOSITION:

DOCUll!ENTED INVOLVING RCS DE-PRESS DUE TO LACK OF INDIC OF W STATUS. PROVIDE POS DIGITAL W POSIT INDIC, RED/BREEN LIGHTS. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUP'.BER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION TP-S.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-n-59. <SEE PI-20 (22A03206)). IIDIS INVOLVED: I -1 LOCATION COJIIPONENT NA,!£ SYSTEI'! SUBSYSTEfl:

---

PCV-2455A PCV-24SSB PRZR SPRAY V

• DAA121 PROCESS CONTROLLER REACTOR COOLANT <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRJ SYS DAA122 PROCESS CONTROLLER REACTOR COOLANT (PRil'IARY LOOP, PWRl SYS H t<<JT IN INV FILE
• 03/17/Bc
• ttJMN EN6INEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT . SURRY ~IT 0 CODE 03/17/86 ASSESS~..Ni LAS~ REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DP.TE ------------------------

---

REQUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS ARE 1IIISS1t<<i FRQIII CR. ti.MN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN O' RESPCHiE.

fff PRO~ DESCRIPTION: ENS VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION t£CESSARY TO MEET TASI{ REOUIREJIIENTS NOT PRESENT IN CR. 8700 PAROORAPH UBER: 6.1,1,1,A 6.5.1,1,B 6~5.1, l,E 6.5.4.1.6 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE CR WITH VISUAL DISPLAY/INDICATION LISTED, I -3 03/17/86 .fff DISPOSITION: PROVIDE INDIC lllTSIDE CHIT, IDEALl.Y IN CR O!ULTIPLEX TO P-250).

• DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N!JllBER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5~1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-77-68 IID!S INVOLVED: LOCATION COJIIPONENT NAPIE SYSTE~ PRI SYS W H NOT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEJII tlJll'.AN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT

• SURRY UNIT 0 CODE B HED NO TITLE 29A02048 POOR DISPLAY LOCATION KJIAN ERROR: DELAY IN LOCATING DISPLAY:-EFFECT IS MINIMIZED DUE TO PROPE R COLOR !HIDING. Hf PROBt.91 DESCRIPTION:

DISPLAYS ARE NOT LOCATED WITH OTl£R RCS COIIPONENTS. 07"9 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.8.1.1.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: r<<:JNE REOOIRED. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-29 (20A01136). ICC UPSRADE TO ADDRESS,

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REfilARl<S:

VI-42-2 I TEl4S INVO.. VED: LOCATION COf!IPONENT NAr.E SYSTEfl! ------------------CORE COOL~ ff NOT IN INV FILE t

• 03/17/86 ASSESS!'IENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -6 03/17/86 SUBSYSTEM lfJ,.:\N ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPDRr 03/17/86
• SURRY UNIT 0 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS -------------~---------

---

20A02049 REWIRED DISPUlYS AND INDICATI~

ARE IUSSIM3 Fio. CR. NONE I -5 11.R ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN (Jl RESPONSE. ./ fff PROBI..EII DESCRIPTIO'.: YIS!Ji.. DISPLAYS~ INDICATION NECESSARY TO MEET TASK REGUIREIENTS ARE NOT PRESENT IN CR. 1 1700 PARAGRAPH NU.mER: 6.1, l,l,A 6.5.1.1.B 6,5. l. l,E 6.5.4.1.6 SU66ESTED ruo<FIT: PROVIDE CR WITH THE VISUAL DISPLAY AND INDICATIONS LISTED.

• fff DISPOSITION:

EXISTING INDICATION IS CORRECT. IF LEAK OFF FLOW 60£S BEYOND EXISTING RANGE, RCP AND PLANT IS SHUTDOWN. THE LOSS OF 1 OR ALL RCPS OOES NOT PREVENT SAFE SHUTDOWN

• r<<J ~TION REQUIRED.
• OOTA ro..LECTION DESCRIPTION

~D CODE NUl'.BER: TP-9.2 Y£RIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RElilRKS: PI-77-65 ITOO INVOLVED: SYSTEM RCP SE~ LKO H NJT IN INV FILE f SUBSYSTEI'! DATE 03/17/86

• HED NO TITLE ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 0 CODE B 2A28S0 REQUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIIM IIIISSING FRQIII CR. tUIAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN OP RE~. lff PROB!.91 DESCRIPTION:

13/17/86 ASSES~ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS ~TE ENS II -6 13/17/86 ~L VISUAL DISPLAYS AND INDICATION NECESSARY TO IEET TASK REGUIREll!ENTS ARE MJT PRESENT IN n£ CR. 1780 PARASRAPH NIMBER: 6.1.1.1.A 6.5.1, 1,B 6.-S, l, l,E 6.5.4.1,6 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE CR WITH THE VISUAL DISPLAY AND INDICATIONS LISTED *

• fff DISPOSITION:

FOR FUii CONTOLLERS LISTED ADD DIGITAL INDICATION. (RED/6R:EN LIGHTS).

• DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE ~BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-S.l DISPLAYS SURVEY REIIIARl<S:

PI-77-3 !TOO INVOLVED: 11'.!RK fO!BER LOCATION CQIIIPOHENT NA!IIE SYSTEfll ICV-1184 RAA.326 PROCESS CONTROLLER CHE/IIICAL AND VOLl.JIIIE CONTROL SYSTEM ICV-11"5 ff NOT IN INV FILE t 1£\1-1110 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PCV-245SB DAA122 PROCESS CONTROLLER REACTOR COOLANT (PRI~RY LOOP, PWRJ SYS TCV-CC-203 DAA128 PROCESS CONTROLLER COMPONENT COOLING SYSTE~ SUBSYSTEfll

• H£D NO TITLE H.M~ ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY 1.Jm 0 CODE C 20A82051 REllUIRED DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS AISSING FRO!! THE CR. IUIAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJl RESPONSE.

fff . PROBlEJII DESCRIPTION: 03/17/86 ASSESS1'1ENT LAST REVIEw RESPONSIBILITY STATUS . DATE II -7 03/17/86 ALL VISUAL DISPLAYS AND INDICATION NECESSARY TO lilEET TASK REQUIR91ENTS ARE NOT PRESENT IN HE CR. 8700 PARAGRAPH fOIBER: 6.1.1.1.A 6.5.1.1,B 6,5.1.1.E

6. 5. 4.1. 6 SUSSESTED BOCKFIT: PROVIDE CR WITH THE VISIJli. DISPLAYS AND INDICATIONS LISTED *

• fff DISPOSITION:

FOR FLl)l CONTROLLERS LISTED ADD DI6ITAL IF FLOW INDICATION IS PRESENT, ANALOG IF r()T,

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl'IBER:

TP-9. 2 VERIFICAi!(r,i AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-n-4 I TEfllS I NVOI.. VED : FCV-FW-255A FCV-FW-255B Fcv-FW-255C tCV-2137 LOCATION COP'PONENT NAME ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM DAA125 PROCESS CONTROLLER CHE!*llCA:... AND VOUJIE CONTROL SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTE!!: LETDOWN

• *
• HJIIIAN ENSINEERING DISC~Y REPORT SURRY OOITI CODE B 82/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAi2l52 AEllJIRED DISPLAYS MISSING FRIii CR. ENG II -6 IUIAN ERROR: DEi.AV/ERROR IN CP RESPCNiE.

fff PROBLEJI DESCRIPTI~: . YISIA. DISPS tECESSARY TO IEET IU TASK REllJIREEITS FOINlfflll, AIMJRIII, al£R6 CPERATICNi t()T PROVIDED IN CR. 1780 PARAGRAPH NI.MBER: 6.5.1, 1,B SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: PROVIDE TI£ YISIA. DI!RAYS r£ED£D BY CR OPERATORS LISTED ON THE ATIACt£D SHEET. fff DISPOSITI~: REFER TO PI-77-1 !21BA02205)

• DATA cru.ECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE N.MBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YAI.IDATION TP-1.7 IIIAINTAINABILITV SURVEY REMARKS: PH06 ITEMS INYClYED: MRK MJIBER LOCATION CCJIIIPONENT NAME SYSTEM DI!RAYS H N'.IT IN INY FILE t SUBSYSTEM 17/15/85

• *
• tOAI EN3INEERIN3 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY ~ITi CODE 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NI TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Ai2t9i DI5PLAYS TOO LIii PAhE..S. .._ ERROR: READIN3 ERRORS LEADING TO ERRORS IN CONTRri. ACTIVATIOH.

Hf PROBl.9I DESCRIPTI~: CDR.T OBSCURE DISPLAYS PIXED LOW~ VERTial. ~, !PERATORS KJST WW ACROSS~ RDS FOR READINGS. 17Nl PARA61ti¥>H f(JIIIBER: 6.1.2.5.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: l()VE DISPLAYS TO HI6t£R POSIT!~ FOR EASY READirE OR REPOSITIOO DESK/cnEO..E HIHR FOR I() NITORING. 1H DISPOSITION: DELETE-DISPLAYS ARE AOOVE 41

• AND ARE t(JT FREOOENTLY USED
• DATA CCllECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NI.JIBER: TP-1.2 ANTH~RICS SURVEY REJIIARKS: Pl-28-5/7 I TEJIIS I NVll. VED: ~RK tOIBER LOCATION COIPCN:NT fM: CTNT PR PROT PRZ LVL ~RD ff f(]T IN INV FILE t H NIT IN INV FILE 1. SYSTEJII SUBSYSTBI VJ,/i7/85

• *
• OOlNEERING DISCREPiM:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE A 02/28/86 ASSES9!ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A112111 ArftKIATOR TILE OORAVING TOO 9Rl tlNIN ERROR1 D£LAY AND/OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPONSE TO ~IATORS fff PROllEJI DESCRIPTI~:

EN6 Df\lW:TERS ON TILES ARE TOO SM.l. TO BE READ FR(JII CP' S DESK AND CCMl(LES

• 07N PARAGRAPH l'OIBER: 6, l, l, 3. A 6. 3. 3. 5. A. 1 S006ESTED BACKFIT: IraEASE ~TERS TO REOOIRED SIZE PER NJREH710 fff DISPOSITI~:

PERF DET ANN STUDY, IN:L SIZE OF OORAYING, PROPER TITLEARRA&, ETC. SEE PI-84 (21A82115) 1 C-9 (22Ai2906), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JNBER: TP-1, 1 ..:JRKSPACE SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS: PI-Z.. INTE6RATE WITH ALL OTl£R ANN..NCIATOR 1£DS, ITEMS INVCl.YED:

• IRK roBER LOCATION CDIPOIENT 1M SYST8' SUBSYSTEM lWD TILES H f()T IN INV FILE t II -5 '7/11/85
• *
• KA EN;INEERING DISCREPAN:Y REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE A 82/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED Ill TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2112 A,NKIATOR TILE ILLIMINATIIWS INDICATES IIIN. CCN>ITIONS.

11.R ERROR: INCREASES PROBABILITY OF OPERATOR lilISSINS IJIIPORTANT SYS. /EllJ IP. STATUS I~O. FRCJI DISCRIMINABILJ'TY 1 ERRORS. lff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: ENG II -5 TILES ARE ILWUNATED UNDER t()RIA. ~ITIONS INSTEAD OF CM.Y IN llJT:..0:-T~ CONDITIO NS. 8780 PARAGRAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.3.3.2.E SUGGESTED BAO<F IT: EV~TE C~ING TO "DARK PANEL" CON:EPT FOR Arft.lNCIATOR SYSTEM. lff DISPOSITION: rnu.ATE LISTED~ FOR ENGINEERirE/LIEIC ~S

• DATA 00.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-3.1 Aff<<JNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW REAA~S: PI-47. RE-BWJATE AFTER UP6RADES.

IIDIS INYCl\B: NARK NIJIBER . LOCATION IDIPCIIENT CB DELTA WIX. CC HDR FL LO DISC VAC PRI HI \US ATP UO CCIND LO NIS SOORCE NJ ROT T-SCN RHR L~ FL~ SB¥.. C-P OFF SR HI-F l:l.KD ff t<<JT IN INY FILE 1 ff IIIT IN INV FILE 1 ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE* ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff IIIT IN INV FILE* ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE* SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 11/17/85

• *
• lt.M EN3INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT e2/28/86 SURRY 1.NIT0 COD* A ASSESSIOT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82113 ~IATOR PUl:ElENT l<<IT CCHiISTENT IIETIEEN lWITS. tUAf ERROR: .DELAY IN R£COONIZIN6 ANt.N:lATOR.

"* PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~: ~IATOR TILE ~/rmr<<:LATURE MJT COOISTENT BETW*£N LWITS. 87"8 PARAGRAPH NlJIIBER: 6.8. 2 * .\. A SOOGESTED BACKFIT: STIMARDIZE PUlCBENT AND NCl1ENCLATURE FOR ~IATOR SYSTEJII. "* DISPOSITI~: REFER TO PI-85 (28Ae2186l AND PI-2 (28A02181l ANU<<:IATOR STUDY

• DATA CTl..LECTIOO DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE l'Ol!ER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~I~Tl~ TP-3.1 Att<<.NICIATOR SYSIDIS REVIEW ~Rl<S: E-11. I IDIS I NVll. ',£I>: ~Rf< NUMBER L.OCATIOO CCIIIPOf£NT NAIi£ SYSTEJII ff f()T IN INV FILE t ENS JI -5 17/11/85 SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• EN6INEERIN6 DI~~ REPORT SURRY UNITI! CO~ 12/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al21M ANN TILES NOT CODED FOR 1DENTIFYIN3 EXTENDED DURATICN ILLIJIINATICN llR ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN (J) RESPONSE.

fH PROIUJII DESCRIPTICN: CDRT TILES NOT CODED FOR IDIN3 lf£N TILE fll.lST B£ IWJIINATED FOR l>>4 EXTENDED DURATION DURIN6 NO RM. lJ>ERATICN. 17li!I PARAS~ NUIU3£R1 6.3.3.2.F SU66ESTED BOO<FIT: DETEfilllitE IF CODIN6 WILL EtffKE RECOONITICN OF SYS/EOOIP, IF SO, PROVIDE. ENSURE ADIi PROC TO LOG *CN* TILE fff DISPOSITICN: DELETE -ANttKIATOR RESPONSE LOG PROVIDES ADMIN CONTROL DATA cw.ECTICN DESCRIPTICN AND CODE IUIBER: TP-3,1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEfllS REVIEW REJIIA~S: PI-48 I TEJIIS I NYCl. VED: MRI< l'UIBER LOCATION COflPCl1ENT NAI£ SYSTEM SUBSYST91 INN SYSTEM ff NOT IN INV FILE* 17/11/85

• *
• IOAI EIEINEERitf3 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY Ltma COIi: 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCIEIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A82105 IU TILE LEGENDS Itm6ISTIWT WITH Oll£R LABELING IN CR, If.MAN ERROR: MY CAUSE DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR RESP!HlE.

CDRT PRO!ll.EN DESCRIPTI~: 1M. TILE LEGEND ABBREVIATIOHS/ACROO'NS DIFFER FROII ~IN6/ABBR£VIATICINS FOR ASSOCIATED CIMRO..S/DISPUIYS. 1780 PARAGRAPH ttJ..aER: 6.3.3.4,D SUGGESTED .BAO<FIT: R£I.ABa IMUCIATOR TILE L£6£NDS USING A[)ll!IN. PROCEDURESFOR USE OF l¥>PROV£D ABBREVIATIONS/ ACFOMS. '** DISPOSITION: DEFER PENDING LABEi.INS SURVEY iwD DEVELll>IENT OF STiN>ARDIZED LABELING LIST

• DATA Ctll.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE PUIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS iwD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-3.1 AIWJNICIATOR SYSTB!S RB'IEW REMRKS: PI.-84 ITEMS INVCl.VED:

MRK MJIIIBER LOCATION CONJOt*NT r9E SYST£111 ANt1M SYST£111 H t()T IN INV FIL£ t SIJBSYSTBI 05/28/85

• *
• HJIAN OOirEERING DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE A 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2116 -,<<:IATOR TILE LEGENDS INI6LOJS/TOO l<<lRDY. ttR ERROR1 MY a.JSE DELAY/ERRORS IN CPERATOR RESPONSE.

1H PROBl.91 IIESCRIPTICli: ANUCIATOR TILE LESENDS ARE AIIIBlSI.OOS TOO l<<lRDY. e7ela PARAGRAPH NlMBER: 6. 3. 3. 4. A S006ESTED BACKFIT: EN6 II -5 PERFOR!II ANN. STUDY TO DETERMINE CORRECT l<<JRDihS FOR RAPID/~RATE IDPR9£NSION If' TILE Pl ESSA6ES. RELABEL TILES Hf DISPOSITION: DEFER. aill.lJlTED AS l<<:IRST-cASE SCENARIO. t£ED TO LOOK ATEA TILE OO!ER DETAILED A ,... STANDARDIZATIOO/lJlGRADE PROO

• DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIIIBER:

TP-3,1 ~ICIATOR SYSTBIS REVIEW TP-£, 1 UUl8.S AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ~RKS: PI-85, SEE PI-2(21A82101l,PI-84(21A82185>,C-9(22Al2986), ITBIS INV<l."9: MRI< fUIBER UlCATION C()l)(>>£NT rAE SYSTEM AMO SYSTEM H r<<lT IN INV FILE f SUBSYSTEM ! 05/28/85

• *
• tlJNAN 96INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY IMITII CODE A 12/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW l£D t<<) TITLE RESP(IEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82119 LACK CF GRCU>It<<;

BY SYSTEM FIKTI~ tUIW ERROR: DELAY IN RELATIN6 ~IATOR TO SYSTEM. Hf

• PROll.EJI DESCRIPTICli:

SUBJECT TILES ARE f(l1' RELATED TO OTl£R TILES IN OOX. 07118 PARAGIWIH NlJIBER: 6. 8.1.1. B SOOGESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE TILES TO f:R>RCPRIATE SRW>S. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-2 FOR COOIDERATI~ DURIN6 IMIKIATOR STUDYC28Al2101l DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFlCATI~ AND Wl.IDATIOH RBIARl<S: E-38 I TENS INYO.. \JED: MARK IUIBER LOCATI~ CIJl>OfENT rM N OOX A 6-1 Cl.WIT 2l 6-5 (UNIT 1> H-1 (I.WIT 2> H-5 (UNIT 1> ff t<<)T IN INV FILE 1 ff tm IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<)T IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff r4JT IN INY FILE I SYSIDI EN6 II -5 f/6/17/85

• SUBSYSTEM
• *
• llMil EtEINEERINi DISCREPA.'<<:V REPORT 02/28/86 SURRV IT0 CODE ASSESSfENT

~T REVIEW HED r<<I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A82124 Arft.N:IATOR TILE FAILURE IS r<<IT IIIEDIATaY APPARENT TO CPS. COlll.T 11M ERROR: DWlY/ERROR IN CP RESP(H;E. / Hf PROa..EN DESCRIPTI~: PIDl>T RECOONITI~ IF OJT-oF-SERVICE TILES t()T .DESI6fED INTO AHN SVS. CPS AWARE CN..V IF IIIR STICKERS AFFIXED, fH 0780 PAIIA6RAPH ttlfl!BER: 6.3.3.3.E SU66£STED BACKFIT: DETERl'IINE FEATURE TO aff:WCE REC06NITI~ IF FAILED TILES& IlilPLEIENT, ENSURE FU8£R/AUD AL CARD COMP FAILS DISPOSITION: ADl!IN PROC REDUIRES TEST OF ANH SVS ONCE PER SHIFT -fllAINTENllCE TASS ARE~ ED F!llOWIIE ID IF FAILED

• DATA COL.l.£CTION DESCRIPTION CODE rt.lf!BER:

~3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSIDIS REVIEW REfllAllt<S: PI-49 !TOO INVO.. VED: fllARK NIJIBER LOCATI~ Ct)l)(>>OT NAflE SVSTEIII SUBSYSTEIII ANH SYSTEIII H r<<JT IN I,t,J FILE t 17/11/85

• *
• tU¥lH ENiitEERI"6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY LNIT0 CODE A 12/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2'Al2125 t<<l AUDITORY SI6NAI. PRIORITY CODIFE OF INUCIATOR ll.ARMS. tlR ERROR: DELAY IN CP RE~ Hf PROa91 DESCRIPTION:

ENS II -5 t() AUD SI!Hl. PRIORITY CODING USED FOR It<<DIIN6 ll.ARMS. OPS r.Arf()T DIFFERENTIATE lllRE Il'PO RTANT FIOI LESS. 1780 PARAGRAPH NOOlER: 6,3, l,4,A, 1 6.3.1.4.A.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE AUDITORY SISNll. PRIORITY CODIFE CAPABILITIES FOR ANN SYS ll.AR"6 IN ACCORDANC£ W/ 6 , 2, 2. 3A-E OF 07N. Hf DISPOSITI~: REFER TO ANMH:IATOR STUDY PER Pl-2 12'At2101> Pl-85128A82116)

• DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE OBER: TP-3,1 ANNlJIICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW ~RKS: . PI-52 ITOO UMl.VED: -MRK ftJIIIBER LOCATION co,,s>()tENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ANN SYST91 H t<<JT IN INV FILE* 97/11/85

• *
• ttR ENiINEERifE DISCREPAPCV REPORT SURRY LWIT8 CODE AB 82/28/86 ASSESSf£HT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESP()eIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Aa2211 S<aE Rlr&S Il'A>PID>RIATE, IEEI) NARROI RAN6ES EXPANDED ltJIAI ERROR: ~V OR ERROR IN CJIERATOR RESPCHlES lff PRO!lEJI DESCRIPTION:

ENS I -3 SOU RAN3ES ARE TOO WIDE FOR l!AXIU DISPLAYED VIUES, NEED ~RR!M RA& TO MAINTAIN EOOI PtENT PDlERL V lff 1780 PA~RM-1 NtNER: 6.5.1.2,D.1 6,5,1,2,D,2 SUOOESTED BACl<F lT: ew:k..~TE FOR APPRl))RlATENESS OF SC:ll.E RAf&:S, REPLACE WITH WIDE RAH6E SC:ll.ES DISPOSITICli: CIJM:RT*TO Llr£AA SOU &-488 SC:Flil -JIIAJOR INCREIENTS OF 58, P!Ir(JR INCR90TS OF s . DATA cru..ECTION DESCRIPTION~ COD£ riJf!BER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-71-5. I TEJIIS INVCl. l,{J): MARK NUMBER LOCATION COIPOtENT l'M: SVSIDI SUBSYSIDI FI-6W-1N PABe55 METER ~TE RADIIKTIVE SYSIDI 12/15/85

• **
• TITLE lt.M ENUNEERIN6 DISC~ REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 28A022l2 SQl.E IMiES TOO NARD, WIDE RIN3E INDICATiflf l<<:rT PROVIDED.

ltJR4 ERROR: PIAY DELAY /ERRORS IN CPERATOR RE~ DUE TO INABILITY TO VERIFY/OITOR SYSTEJI/EGUIPIENT STATUS. Hf PAOflDI DESCRIPTiflf: 02/28/86 ASS£SS,ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II 11/11/85 SC$US RAN3ES TOO ~RROW FOR PIAXIIU DISPLAYED WUES. SlPP0RTIN6 WIDE INSTRUIENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 8780 PARASRAPH IU!BER: 6.5.1.2.D.3 SU66ESTED BAD<F IT: PROVIDE: WIDE-RANJE INSTR1.JENTATION TO SUPPORT IETER INDICATil>>t. fff DISPOSITION: OR&: sati TO READ 28"-30" DATA ro..LECTiflf DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-5. 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY R91A~S: PI-72-2. ITEJIIS INYCl. IS: PIARI< IUIBER L.OCATIIJI C(N)()t,ENT rM: SYS1D SUBSYSTEM CHDNSER VAC ff r(JT IN IHV FILE f

• *
• tlMlN EhSINEERitE DISCREPAJCY REPORT SURRY LNITIJ CODE B TITLE 28All22l3 IETERS DO NIT FAIL IFF-sal.E.

tt.MH ERROR: MY~ IPERATOR RESPCNlE ERRORS DUE TO INABILITY TO DETER NII'£ Pt.ANT STATUS. fff PIIDSLEJII DESCRIPTic>>I: B2/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW AE~IBILITY STATUS DATE C(N)LT 88/87/85 SOIE METERS FAIL IN CENTER OF IN ZERO POSITION. TRS LOOSE POER, P8f FAILS. 07N PARAGRAPti NIJIUIER: 6.5.1.1.F SOOGESTED BACl<FIT: ADJUST/REl>Ln .iETERS THAT DO t()T FAIL IN lf'F-sn.E. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO P.9.2-15 (22A82857) DATA cru..ECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE OBER: T~5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RBIARKS: PI-73 ITEMS UMl. VED: MRK NJIIIBER LOCATION COIIPOrENT NAME SYSTEM IIETERS H t()T IN INV FILE* SUBSYSTEM I

• *
• tUIAN EtEINEERIN6 DI~Y REPORT SURRY IMITI CODE B 92/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED l'<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2284 SOI.£ RANES TOO NARRIJI, WIDE !REE INDICATION NOT PROVIDED.

lUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJ> RESPCNE. Hf PROII.EJI DESCRIPTION: EN6 II~ SCll.ES RANES :roo ~RROW FOR fllAXIU DISPLAYED VAl.l£S. 51.PPORTINS WIDE~ INSTRlJENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 8710 PARAGRAPH tO'.BER: 6. 5.1. 2. D. 3 !lJGGESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE WIDE-Mt& INSTRIJIEHTATION TO SUPPORT IETER INDICATION. 1+1 DISPOSITION: EtE STUDY TO DETEJIIIrE D.E REllJIRaENT. COORDI~TE WITH PI-19-4 (2t.J13828)

• DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIIBER:

TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATIOf RBARKS: PI-72-3. ITEM INV!l.VED: BO~ REC. PDT-PRESSURE ITEMS INVCl. VED: IIIARK NMB£R LOCATION IDIPOrENT NAIi£ SYSTal SUBSYSTEJII B RCVRY PDT H ~T IN INV FILE t 12/14/85

• *
• tUIAH EtEir£ERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y R£PORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITI CODE A ASS£SS1ENT LAST. REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RESPOOIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAl22t5 saLE RANES TOO NARD, WIDE RIM£ INDICATICW r<<lT PROVIDED.

EN6 I -1 11/38/86 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RE~ / fff PROllLBI DESCRIPTI~: saus RAt<>c REIIIARKS: PI-72-4. lTEJII INVCl.VED: INCOR£ T~ I TEJIIS INYll.'JED: ~RK fUIBER LOCATION COl>ONENT NAPE SYSTBI SUBSYSTEJII INCORE TIC H r<<lT IN INY FIL£ t

• *
• It.A OOINEERHE DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY LWIT8 CODE B "2/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCJEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A2286 SCALE !REES TOO NARRCJI, WIDE RiwsE INDICATI~

P<<IT PROVIDED. tU!AN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RE~. fH PRCIILEJII DESCRIPTION: SCll.ES RAH6£S TOO NARROW FOR PIAXIIUI DISPLAYED VALL£S. SlPPORTitE WIDE RA& INSTIMENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 87"8 PA~RAPH NJl'IBER:

6. 5.1. 2. D. 3 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:

PROVIDE WIDE-RAJ&: INSTRUl£NTATION TO SUPPORT IETER INDICATION. fH DISPOSITION: HI-LO. PIETERS KWE RECENTLY BEEN ADDED SO Tt'AT RAN;ES ARE APPROPRIATE FOR 111Arn1u Pl FLCM mEY r<<l LONSER PES OOT. l DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M.MBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION REPIARKS: PI-72-8. ITEPI INVil..VED: CNTIIWT PURSE -VENT FLOW ITEMS IN'4VED: -~RK rtllilBER LOCATION ~T NAi1IE SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEPI CTPIT PURSE H NJT IN INV FILE t 12/19/85

• * ** ltNlN ENHN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B HED t() TITLE 28A82287 SCALE RAN6ES TOO ~R(M, WIDE RANGE INDICATION t()T PROVIDED.

tUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. fH Pm.EM DESCRIPTION: 82/28/86 ASSESMNT LAST REVIEW RESP06IBIL1TY STATUS DATE EN6 II -7 12/14/85 D.E 11Af&S TOO ~RROW FOR flAXIIUI DISPLAYED VAUES. SlPPORTINS WIDE RA.'ETE INSTRlJ!ENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 1710 PARAS~ N.JMBER: 6. 5.1,2.D. 3 SUGGESTED BACKF IT: PR0VID£ WIDE-~ INSTRUl!ENTATION TO SUPPORT METER INDICATION.

• '* DISP0SITill4:

ORE DISPtAY TO BE 18' -35' DATA CO-LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.MBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATICft REJIRRKS: PI-72-9. ITEMS INVCl.VEih MRK tUIBER LOCATION COIIOfENT LT-CW-191 LT-cw-291 ff r<<JT IN INY FILE t ff t(IT IN INV FILE t SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM

• tUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPIN:Y REPORT SURRY ~ITi CODE B 1!2/28/86 ASSESSflENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2tAl22l8 SOU RfHiES TOO NARROW, WIDE RAN6E INDICATim.

t<<lT PROVIDED. tUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPC>>ISE. fH PRDlllBI DESCRIPTitw: EN6 II -6 SC$¥_ES RAfE£S TOO NARROW FOR flAXIIUI DISPUIYED VIU£S. StJlPORTirE WIDE IR&: INSTRll!ENTS N OT PROVIDED IN CR. 1710 PARAGRAPH NUIIBER: 6. 5.1.2. D. 3 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: PROVIDE: WIDE-IR&: lNSTRlJIENTATim. TO SUPPORT IIETER INDICATION. fH DISPOSITitw: ADD WR 0-381 GP"-SEE Pl-71-11 (28Al22141 DATA cw.ECTitw DESCRIPTI~ CODE NUMBER: . TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATltw AND IJALIDATIOC ~RKS:. PI-72-18. I TENS INY(l. VED: IIAAK MJ&R LOCATION llNlOr£NT NAfilE SYSTEM SUBSYST01 ff NlT IN INY FIL£ t 1!2/14/85

• *
• tlJIAN ENSINt'..ERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT 0 CODEC 13/17/IIE>

ASSESSIJIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IA02209 SCALE RiNiES INAPPROPRIATE, NEED NARROW RAl'EES EXPANDED. ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJl RESPONSE. H+ PROBID DESCRIPTION: II -7 SCALE RANGES ARE TOO WIDE FOR MAXIO DISPLAYED YAL.1£S, NEED NARROW RANGE TO ~INTAIN EQUI PIENT PROPER!.. Y

• ff+ . 1780 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6.5.1,2,D.1 6, 5, l, 2, D, 2 SU36ESTED BACKFIT: EVALUATE FOR APPROPRIATENESS OF SCALES RANGES, REPLACE WITH WIDE RANGE SCALES. DISPOSITION:

PRZR PRESS RAtEE IS t<<JW ADEQUATE, SINCE THE RCP TRIP CRITERION IN THE NEW EOPS I S BASED lJmi SUBC00LIN6 MRSINPROVIDED TO THE ICC PIONITOR, RATHER THAN PRZR PRE SS OF 1600 PSIS. NO OCTION RElllIRED. DATA ctllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIBER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9. 2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ RalARl<S: PI-71-7, ENGINEERING PROVIDE EXPANDED SCAt..E. ITEIE INVOLVED: Ill RK NIJIIIBER LOCATION CIJlll)()NENT NA,£ SYSTEJI! SUBSYSTEM PRZR PRESS H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 13/17/86

• **
• tlMf ENHNEERIN6 DlSCREPAf<<:Y REPORT SURRY ~IT8 CODE B 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITl.£ RESPCJEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2'Al2211 salE IR&S Itf!PPRCPRIATE, t£ED ~RR()I RANSES EXPANDED.

EN6 I -2 It.A ERROR1 DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPC>>EE. 1H PROa.91 DESCRIPTill4: SC1E RA&S ARE TOO WIDE FOR PIAXIO DISPl.AYED 'AlES, NEED NARROW RAt& TO PIAINTAIN EOOI PfENT PRCPERL V, 1710 PARAGRAPH rulBER: 6.5,1.2.D,1 6.5.1,2.D.2 SUSSESTED BACKF l T: EYALl.ilTE FOR APPROPRIATEtESS OF SCALE RAIEES, WITH WIDE RANElE SCALES, fff DISPOSITION: NEEDS EXPANDfD SCALE. PUT ON RWST RECORDER. DATA CCLLECTIC* DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER: TP-5. 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 YERIFICATIC* AND ~IDATIO. REMRl<S: PI-71-4. EN6INEERIIE PROVIDE EXPAHDED SCALE. ITEIIS INVll. VED: MAIi< NJIBER LOCATIC* C()IP()ENT NflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CAT LEVEL H r(JT IN INV FIL.£ t 02/15/85

• *
• 1tM OOINEERING DISCREPIM:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT& CODE B 82/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPC>>cSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2R2211 SOU !REES INAPPR(J)RIATE, l'£ED l'i\RRCM R1MiE EXPANDED, K.IAI ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESPONSE.

1 Hf PRCIUN DESCRIPTICW: ENS III-7 SOU RAr&:S AR£ TOO WIDE FOR IIAXlPUI DISPLAYED~ rEED ~RR{M RAN6c TO ~INTAIN EQUI Pf£NT PRIPERL Y, 171J8 PARAGRAPH NJl!BER: 6.5.1.2.D,1 6,5,1,2,D.2. SU66ESTED BOO<FIT: Ml.UTE FOR APPR0PRIATEt£SS Cf' SOU RA&S. REPUU WITH WIDE RAtfiE sm..ES. Hf DISPOSITICW: ES TO DETERMI1'£ IIIIN-IIAX SI FUJW & DilMiE DlSPlAY ACCORDIN6LY, 00 TO PROVIDE EXP lr-O)ED sau. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTICW AND CODE M.Jl!ER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION REJIIARKS: PI-71-2. ITEMS INYCLVED: II.ARK fUIBER LOCATION IDfflEHT NAME FT-1-932 FT-1-9JJ FT-l-':161 FT-1-961 FT-1-962 FT-1-963 FT-2-932 FT-2-9JJ FT-2-968 FT-2-961 FT-2-962 ff NJT IN INY FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE

• ff NJT IN INV FILE t H NlT IN INY FILE* ff f()T IN INV FILE t ff N'.IT IN INY FILE* ff f()T IN INV FILE* ff f()T IN INV FIL£ t ff f()T IN INV FIL£ t ff N'.IT IN INV FILE t ff f()T IN INV FILE t SYSIDI Sl1BSYST9I 12/15/85
• *
• t£D Ml: 2A2211 ITEJIIS INVll. YED: MAK fUIBER LOCATic>>I CQ!lllOf,ENT NAIE IUIAN 96INEERIN6 DI!l:REPAt<<:Y REPORT SURRY LNIT8 SYSTEM FT-2-963 ff r<<IT IN INY FILE* 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEM
• * ** EhSINEERifE DISCREAAICY REPORT SURRY 1.rme CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESP!MHBILITY STATUS DATE 29A82212 SOU RANES INi¥JPR(1)RIATE, NEED NAARCM RANES EXPiNlED.

ti.JAi ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESP06E. lt-f PROll.EN DESCRIPTION: I -2 !m..E RA.EES ARE TOO WIDE FOR IIIAXIIUI DISPLAYED WUES, t££D NARRCM RAfEE TO .w:IINTAIN EOUI PfENT PRCPEll. Y, 1718 PARAGRAPH tUtBER: 6.5.1,2.D,1 6.5.1,2,D,2 SIJ66ESTED ~IT: ~TE FOR APPR£PRIATEt£SS IF~ RAN3ES, REPLACE WITH NARRCM RA& D..ES. .... DISPOSITION: R£FER TO HR-6 (22A95886l, DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTICl4 AND CODE UBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATI~ RENARl<S: PI-71-li. I TEJIIS INY!l. \El: IIIARK NIJIIBER L.OCATICl4 <nmENT NAfE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEN ff IClT IN INV FILE 1 V/2./15/85

• *
• II.A ENSINEERitE DISCREPIKY REPORT SURRY 1.NITi CODEC 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE!iPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2BAl2213 RAN6E INAPPRCPRIATE, t£ED NARRCM RAN6ES EXPflilED. ERROii: DElAY/ERROR IN (I) RESPC>>EE.

fff PAOll8I DESCRIPTIIJI: III-9 &AE RAt&:S ARE TOO WIDE FOR JIIAXIO DISPLAYED~ PEED ~RROW RAJ& TO ~INTAIN EDUI Pll£HT PIU>ERL y I 8780 PARAGRAPH N.JfmER: 6.5.I.2.D.l 6.5.1.2.D.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: Ml.~TE FOR APPRCPRIATENESS OF RA&S, REPLAC£ WITH WIDE RAJ&: saus. fff DISPOSITIIJI: r() ACTIIJI REl!JIRED. SOLES ARE APPROPRIATE FOR PARAIETERS DISPLAYED

• DATA C(UECTIIJI DESCRIPTIIJI AND CODE tulBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 YERIFICATIIJI AND Vll.IDATI(Jj

~RKS: PI.-71-8. I T9IS INVCl. l.{I): JIIAIIK NlJIBER LOCATIIJI C()R)£NT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII CC HDR FLOW ff f()T IN INV FIL.£ t 82/15/85

• *
• ltJIAN ENiINEERIJE DISCIIEPA'<<:Y REPORT W28/86 SURRY 1.1me CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESP*lEIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2214 sal.E IR&S INAPPDRIATE, t£ED RAN6ES EXPANDED.

ti.NW ERROii: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPINlE. lff PROa.91 1eCRIPTI~1 EN6 II~ sal.E MrEE TOO WIDE FOR NAXIU DISPLAYED YAUES, fEED NARRCM RAr&: TO IIAJNTAIN EOOIPfENT PfO!Ell.Y. 17N PARASRMi NJIBER: 6.5.1.2.D.1 6.5.1.2.D.2. SU66£STED BAO<FIT: Ml.~TE FOR APPDRIATE1*SS OF !m.E RA&S, REPLftCE WITH WIDE RAN6ES SCIUS. lff DISPOSITI~: ADO LlJEAR 19-300 SPIO FOR CHAS & LD

• DATA cru.ECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-5.1 DISPUIYS SU1!V£Y TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ AND YALIDATIIJI REIIARKS: Pl-71-11. IT91S INVa. *,gh IIARK tOIBER LOCATillf C(Nl()ENT NAIE SYSTEJII CHil6Iff3 FWl H t<<>T IN INY FILE I I 12/15/85

• tlJlfAH ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORi SURRY ~IT 0 CODE B B3/17i86 ASSESSIIIENT LAST *REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ----------------------

---

20A82215 SCALE RANGE INAPPR(J)RIATE, tEED NARR(lj EXPANDED.

1tM ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJ) RESPONSE. H4 PROBI..Efl DESCRIPTION: ENS I -2 S!AE RANGE TOO WIDE FOR ~XIIUI DISPLAYED VAU£S, NEED NARROW RAN6E TO ~INTAIN EOOIPPIENT PRCJJERLY;

• 1780 PARAGRAPH NJPIBER: 6.5.1.2.0.1 6.5.1.2,D.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: EVALUATE FOR APPROPRIATENESS OF SCALE RANSES, REPLACE WITH WIDE RANGE SCALES. . DISPOSITION:

~RI< SCALE WITH TECH. SPEC. AND ALA8" Lli'!ITS. DATA ro.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl4BER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION ~Rl<S: PI-71-12. ITEJIIS I NW.. VED: LOCATION COffl)()NENT NA,!£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEl'l IIAST H t<<JT IN INV FILE f

• 03/17/86.
• *
• EtfiINEERirE DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY 1.Jml CODE A 12/28/86 ASSESSfllEHT LAST REVIEW HED 00 TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A2216 5al.E RAtEE I!AlPRCPRIATE, PEED NARR(M EXM'IDEO.

ENS II -5 KR ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJl ~. i *" PROBWI DESCRIPTI~: SCU RAMlE TOO WIDE FOR fllAXIU DISPLAYED VAL1£S, r£ED NARRtM TO ~INTAIN EOOIPfENT PRCPERLY. 1780 PARASRM-i rol&R: 6.5.1.2.0.1 6.5.1.2.0.2. SU66£STED BAD<FIT: EVIUJ'.lTE FOR APPRCPRIATENESS Cf' 5aU RAtt3E, REPLln WITH WIDE scaE. *" DISPOSITI~: RESCU MTR 8-581 6PPl -WEAR IF<<:RE1£NTS -11 SPl'I

• DATA ro..t.ECTIC..

DESCRIPTIC.. AND CODE UBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATI()j REfl!ARl<S: PI-71-14. IIDIS INVOLVED: ~RI< NUPIBER LOCATION CCJIIIPOENT SYSTEM IFW FLlll H ~T IN INV FILE

• SUBSYSTEM 82/15/85.
• *
• EN;ItEERitli DISC~ REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE A 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2217 sea£~ INAPPRCPRIATE, IEED NARROil EXMIDEI>, ENS II -S tlJllN ERROR: DWIY/ERAOR IN IP RESP!J$E.

/ fff PROa.EJII DESCRIPTI~: sm..£ RAtliES ARE TOO WIDE FOR MXIIUI DISPLAYED ~.l£S, r£ED ~RRCM RANS£ TO MINTAIN EllJI PfENT PRIPERLY 8780 PARAGRAPH tf.JIBER: 6.S.1,2,D.1 6.S.1.2,D.2 SU66£STED BAD<FIT: EVAL~TE FOR APPROPRIATEtESS Cf SC&L£ RAtEES, REPUn: WITH WIDE~ saus. 11:1 DISPOSITION: PROVIDE BAND FOR laEPTABLE IPERATitli AAr&:

• DATA CD..LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE fUIBER: TP-S.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-S.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IIIATI(>>j ~Rl<S: PI-71-17. IIDIS INVO..VED: MRI< ttJIIIBER LOCATI~ C(lfl(MNT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM SI OCClM PR ** f(IT IN INV FIL.£ f 12/15/85

• *
• ltll'!AN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT @ CODE C 03/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVlEw l£D I'() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------*-----------------

---

2A2218 SCALE~ INAPPROPRIATE, NEED NARRCAii EXPANDED.

tlWlN ERROR: .DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESPONSE. lff PROEl.81 .DESCRIPTION: ENS II -7 SCALE RANGES ARE TOO WIDE FOR ~XIU DISPLAYED IJALI.ES, r£ED ~RROW RANGE TO ~INTAIN EQUI MNT PR(J)ERL. Y. 1780 PARAGRAPH N.lf!BER: 6.5.1,2.D.1 6.5.1,2,D,2 Sl66ESTED M:KFIT: EVALUATE FOR APPROPRIATENESS OF SCALE RANGES, REPLACE WITH WIDE RANGE SCALES. DISPOSITION: RESC~E l!ID RAtEE PRESS l'ITR (0-30 PSIAl DATA CO!..LECTICN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUP:~R: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATICJ1 RE~RKS: Pl-71-18. ITEMS INVQ.VED: LOCATION COPPONENT NAPlE SYST£ll! SUBSYST£ll! CNTIIINT WR PR HNOT IN INV FILE t 03/17/86

• *
• IUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISC~ REPORT SURRY ~ITI lllDE A 12/28/86 A$ESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPC*SIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A82219 SCALE RANGE INAPPRO>RIATE, tEED PIIRROI RAN6E EXPINlEO.

ti.A ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. fff PROBID DESCRIPTION: IO£ saLE RA.tEES ARE TOO WIDE FOR MXIO DISPLAYED wu.ES, IEED ~RROW IIAf&: TO ,IIINTAIN EOOI PtENT PRIJlERI.. Y. fff 1710 PARASRM-1 IUIBER: 6,5,1.2.D.1 6.5.1.2.D.2 SU66ESTED BIO<FIT: EVIUi\TE FOR APPRCPRIATENESS OF SCALE RA.tEES, REPLAC£ WITH WIDE RArEE saus. DISPOSITION: HI-LOW ,ETERS RECENTLY BEEN ADDED A.IJE WITH A THIRD CPERATOR TO KJNITOR TH EJI. RANGES ARE to. APPRCPRIATE

• DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION IN> CODE NJIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION IN> VALIDATION REMRKS: PI-71-16, ITEJIS INVOL \JED: MRK NUPIBER LOCATION COIJOrENT fflfllE SVSTEJI SUBSVSTEJI CTIIT PRS VNT , ff NOT IN INV FILE t 12/19/85
• -*
• ENiINEERINS DISCREPArf:{

REPORT SURRY Lt4ITI aJDE B 12/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESP(IE18ILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---

28Al2228 Ifll>RIJ)ER ML TIPLIER/~IT 6RADUATICl6.

tUIAN ERROR: INTERPWITION ERRORS. READINS ERRORS. Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: l.t4IT SRADUATIONS, AS A FOCTION CF SCILE ll.ll.TIPLIERS, AR£ Iflll>ROPER, E.G., W, 611, 168, 2 41, 228 171el PARAGRAPH ru!BER: 6.5,1,5.C !ll66£STED .8ACKF IT: RE-DESIGN TO CONFORIII TO 6UID£L.IrE -aIIIIINATE MJi. TIPLIERS, IF POSSIBLE. Hf DISPOSITION: IIIETERS ARE USED FOR SYSTEJII DISTRIBUTION FACTORS, f()T FOR ~T OPERATIONS~ TH EREFDRE fil IIIIPACT ON Pl.ANT SAFETY. t() ACTI~ DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE MJIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY ~RKS: E-30. ITEMS INVOLVED: SWITCHYARD STATUS IIITRS. IIDIS INVCl. VED: ~RK NUMBER LOCATION CCJl)(lfENT JAE: SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM SEE ~RKS FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAfl _SYSTEfll ISCLATION \'fl.YES 11/31/86

• *
• 11M EN6It£ERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT& CODE B 12/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW t£D N) TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE .21Ai2229 ZM IIIARKIN6S, tU!AN ERROR: IIIIS-READ DISUYED VALUE. INTERPO.ATION ERRORS. Hf PROll.9I DESCRIPTION:

NlD II -7 ZONE MARKIFE OBSCURE UNIT ~TION MARKS~ ARE MJT CIHilSTENT WITH PUWT IDNENTION F OR CO.OR USASE. 8780 PA~ ftJIIIBER:

6. 5. 2, J, B 6 *. 5.2. J,C SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: INCREASE CONTRAST OF UNIT ~TIOHS. STANDARDIZE COUJRCODHE.

Hf DISPOSITION: USE TfRB>ARENT ~RTP9< TAPE TO li'ARK r<<lf!IIR.. SETPTS. rllD TO PREPARE 6 UIDELltES TO APPI.Y MRKIN6S, REFER TO PI-lli-1 12Mc!N7), DATA CO-LECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE fdBER: TP-5.1 DISUYS SURVEY REll'ARKS: E-27. IIIDIS INV: STIii SEN BD FLOW I OTl£R KTRS AS ~ROPR.) ITEMS INVCl. VED: IIIARK NlJIIIBER LOCATION COIRlfENT ,-FI-BD-llJA FI-BD-11!JB FI-BD-10-\A FI-BD-184B ff MJT IN INV FILE f ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff f()T IN INV FILE t ff NlT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 11/38/86

• *
• ti.WW EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAPCf REPORT SURRY IJHT@ CODE A HED NO TITLE 21A82230 DISPLAY OOTPUT DCES NOT ~CM ACCURATE READING ERROR: DISPLAY INTERPRETATION ERROR. lff PROBt.£111 DESCRIPTION:

12/28/86 ASSES9£NT LAST REVIEW RESPCJEIBILITY STATUS DATE II -5 17/11/85 ERSS <REMARKS> REO READIN6 CF 25 (30) 6PPI FD FLW TO S6S.EXISTIN6 SCIU lllT ~Y. INTER VALS TOO LS. 87il0 PARAGRAPH rtMBER: 6.5.l.2,A SUSSESTED BACl<F IT: PROVID£ SCll.£ TO ~LOW CPERATOR TO READ 25 (30) 6PM FEEDFL.OW. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-71-14 128Al2216l. RESaLE INDICATOR

• DATA ro..LECTI~

DESCRIPTION AND CODE fUIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND \Hl.IDATION ~S: VI-6. ERGS: ECA-2.1, FR-H. 5, FR-P.1, FR-P. 2 ITEMS INVll. VED: ~RK tt.JMBER LOCATION CDR>>ENT FI-FW-2:NA FI-FW-289B FI-FW-208C ff NJT IN INV FILE* ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* ff NJT IN INV FILE* svsru SUBSYSTEM

• *
• tURi ENSINEERirE DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY LMIT0 CODEC 82/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2231 IlflDE~TE PRECISI~ .._ ERROR: INTERPtlATICl4 ERRORS Hf PRCUU,I DESCRIPTION:

III-8 / PROCEDURES REQUIRE CPERATOR TO DETERIIIINE IIWST LEVEL TO 0.5% -PRECISION~ DISPLAY IS l.~ 8780 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: fi. 5.1. 2. A SU66ESTED BACKF IT: INCR£ASE DISPLAY PRECISION. CONSERVATIVELY ROIN) PROCEDURAL STATBENT TO IEAREST 1%. *+* DISPOSITION: RECmlEND Cl1'SERVATivaY ROLNDIN6 PROCEDURAL STATEMENT TO IEAREST 1%

• DATA cru.ECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJJ.ARKS: VI-12 ITEMS INVO._IJED: . ~RK fOIBER LOCATION cnPOr£NT NAIi£ Ll-CS-2@0A LI-cs-218B LI-CS-2M: LI-CS-218D PM388 EER PAB388 IETER PM389 METER PAB389 IETER SYSTEfil CONTAitfEHT SPRAY SYSTEJII CONTAIIIENT SPRAY SYSTBI ~TAIPIENT SPRAY SYSTEM CONTAINIENT SPRAY SYST91 SUBSYSTEfil 17/11/85

• *
• It.A OOINEERIIE DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY ltHT0 CODE 12/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A82232 RS HXS SW su>PLY FLCM 11M ERROR: DISP1.AY INTERPRETATION ERROR. H-1 PROBL91 IESCRIPTION:

all>LT EXISTIIE SCALE DO*S P<<>T ALLOW FOR ~RATE READill6 6e88 SPIii AS STATED IN ERS FR-I.1. HI 8700 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5.1.2.D.1 S006ESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE SC!U TO~ CPERATOR TO READ 6N0 6Plt. DISPOSITION: DELETE-PROC FRP-2,l REQ 6N0 SPIii SW TO EA AVAIL RS HX. lffRS FI-sw-286A-D AVAIL 0 N SAfllE PNL, APPRCP sa¥-Eil C RMRIO DATA COLL.£CTIOH DESCRIPTION CODE NJIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATION TP-5.l DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: VI-21. DISP: AT 0-aee0 SPIii. ITEJIIS INVCl ~: -MRI< tOIBER LOCATION CDIPClENT SYSTEM FI-185A Fl-1"5B FI-285A FI-28SB H NlT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 DBB310 EER SERVICE WATER SYSTEM CWIB311 IETER SERVICE WATER SYSTEJI! S1JBSYST9I 17/11/85

• *
• ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ltl IT ii CODE B 03/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------

2eA02233 Irw>EGUATE SCALE RANGE. ENS II -6 KM ERROR: INABILITY TO ASSESS PARA.IIETER STATUS. fff PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: PROCEDURES REOOIRE OPERATOR TO VERIFY TENPERATURE LP TO 1280 DES F -SCiti RAN;£ IS TO 700 DEG F. 8780 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1.2. D SUSSESTED .BACKFIT: REPLACE IETER WITH SCALE THAT CAN ACCOMODATE OPERATOR INFORl'IATION REOOIREl!IENTS; +H DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-29 (20A01136J. ICC UPSRADE TO ADDRESS

• DATA CTUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIIBER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: Vl-70. ITE!r. INVOLVED IS ON INCORE PANEL -NO ~RK NO. ITEMS INVOLVED: LOCATION COl'IPONENT NAAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEfll !UC 1£TER ff NOT IN INV FILE+ 03/17/86

• *
• i..-ENilNEERIN6 DISCIIEPArCY REPORT SURRY ~ne CODE C 12/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A82235 INADEQIJITE DISPLAY PRECISION KJIAN ERROR: INTERPCLATION ERROR. fff PROBL.£JII DESCRIPTION:

IIl-8 PROCEDl.lRE 11E1lJIR£S CPERATOR TO VERIFY 14.2 PSIA -DISPLAY PRECISION IS TO rEAREST .5 PSIA. 17N PARAGRAPH l'UIBER: 6.S.1.2.A Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: INCREASE DISPLAY PRECISION. CONSERVATIVELY~ Pf!OCEDURAL. REQUIREf!ENT TO PEAREST .5 PSIA fff DISPOSITION: NJ ~TI!~. Cl> RED TO VERIFY PRESS LESS THAN 14, 2 PSIA, D4/D5 PNL B IL.LIIIINS AT 14,2 PSIA, PA~ AVAIL ON PC

• DATA CDU.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE IOIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION

~RKS: VI-72. ITEJIIS INVO..VED ARE CONTAINll!ENT PRESSURE (4 DfN£1.Sl ITEMS INVCl.m>: MRK NJIIIBER LOCATION. COlflOJENT 191£ PI-u.-2NA PI-ut-281B PI-LJ1-2M: PI-ut-28ID SAC311 METER SAAJ12 EER SAB312 IIIETER SAC312 EER SYSTEJII LEAl<A6E OITORIN6 SYSTEJII LEAKA6E 0ITORIN6 SYSTEM. L.EAKA6E f(INITORINS SYSTEJII OITORIN6 SYSTBI SUBSYSTEJI! 87/11/85

• * ** ... OOINEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY ~IT0 CODE B 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RE!imEIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---

29Ae2236 DISPLAY llJTPUT OOES t<<IT 'llCM ACOJRATE READIN6. ti.MN ERROR: DI!Jll.AY INTERPRETATION ERROR, fff PROBI.BI DESCRIPTION:

READirt3S CF 7 1 4" & 7 1 9" ARE IIEOOESTED. sau Ir£R91ENTS ARE IN 1.14ITS CF 2.4 Ir<<:t£S. fff 0790 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.5.1,2,D.1 Sl.6SESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE sau TOR.LCM CPERATOR TO READ r£CESSARY LEVELS DISPOSITION: RESOU 1£TER TO 2" IfCREIENTS PUT IIIARKirt3S ON SCAL£T0 DEl(JTE 7 1 4" AND 7 1 9"

• DATA cru.ECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: VI-73. (lnlPClt£NTS ARE RECIRC SPRAY St.JJll ITOO INVOLVED: 11'.lRK NIJIIIBER LOCATION CDIPOPENT tAE SYSTEM LI-RS-251A LI-RS-251B

• IETER CCWTAINIEHT RECIRCWITINS SPRAY SYSTEJII ff NJT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM II~ 87/11/85
• *
• HED NO tUIAN OOINEERIIE DISC~ REPORT SURRY UNill CODE B TITLE 28A82241 DI~Y IJ.JTPUT DOES NOT ll.LCM ACCURATE READINS. tUIAN ERROR: DISP~Y INTERPRETATION ERROR. / tH PIICHUJII DESCRIPTION:

fff IETERS It£R8ENT IN 4-1/2, 5-1/2., 6-1/2 -~RD TO READ. 0790 PARAGRAPH ttl!BER: 6. 5. l, 2. D. 1 SOOGESTED BAO<FIT: PROVIDE SCALE TO OP TO READ NECESSARY. DISPOSITION: DilMJE SC!U TO 0 TO 25" WITH 5" MJOR IICRalENTS 1 "flIN'.lRS

• DATA C(l.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~

~IDATION TP-5.1 DISPUlYS SURVEY REIIIARKS: Vl-73-2 ITEJIIS INVCLVED: IARK NJMBER LOCATION COIP()ENT fAilE LI-DA-211A LI-DA-2108 ~12 PETER OAB312 IETER SYSTEJII DRAINS (AERATED> SYSTEM DRAINS CAERATEDl SYSTEM 12/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -£ 17/11/85 SUBSYSTBI

• *
• ErEINEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY ~IT@ CODE B
• 12/28/86 ASSESSl'IENT

~T REVIEW HED NO

• TITLE RESP()EIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A82381 LlMINKE POOR FRt)I SCRATCHED AND DAAA6ED LIBHT LENSES ti.MAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN D'ERATOR RE~ / Hf PROBI.BI DESCRIPTI~:

II -7 LENSES SCRATCl£D/DAIAE>, CArf(JT TELL IF LIGHTS ARE C.. OR £FF. DW<<JT BE CLEANED/REPAIRED. 9700 PARAGRAPH Ul£R: 6.5.3.1,B SOOGESTED BIO<FIT: REPLJ¥;E LENSES, Ct£D< FOR UJIIPACE DISCRHIIIW!ILlTY (AMBIENT LI6HTil't3 ~y BE TOO BRIGHT) .... DISPOSITION: REPlJn'. IU SCRATDtED/DAM6£D LIGHT LENS DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RBIARKS: PI-32 ITEJIIS ItMll YED: MRK to!BER LOCATION COflPONENT NAPIE SYSTEM SUBSYST01 IND LIGHTS H tflT IN INV FILE 1 li/17/85 *.

• *
• ENSINEERitE DISC~Y REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY ~IT8 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESP!lSIBILITV STATUS DATE 28A02302 SYS/EQUIP STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEil'E CFF t<<.M ERROR: ERRORS IN CP£RATOR RESPONSE FR()! EROEOOS ~PTIONS IF PL ANT STATUS DUE TO BURNED OUT BLU3S lff , PROBWI DESCRIPTION:

ENG I -2 SYSTEJ!l/EQUIPIIIENT STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEINS OFF INSTEAD OF ILWIINATED, 0700 PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER:

6. S. 3.1. C SUS6ESTED BAC!{FIT:

EVALUATE eot.SEQUENCES OF 1'1ISJUD6E!ENT DUE TO THIS PROB'...91 AND IF POTENTIA:... HAZARD, REVERSE lff DISPOSITION: r£EDS RINSBACK FOR AUTO UNBLOCK. REFER TO ANNUN STUDY PI-85 C20A02106l

• DATA COLLECTI~

DESCRIPTION AND CODE NU!raER: TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RalARKS: PI-68-3. ITEf!IS INVOLVED: SI BLOCK ITEMS INV!k. VED: -MRI< N.JfUlER LOCATION COfRlNENT HDR/LINE DP HI STIii FLOW LO PRZR PRES LO STIii PRESS LO TAVE H NJT IN INV FIL£

• ff l()T IN INV FILE -t ff NOT IN INV FILE
• ff l()T IN INV FILE 1 ff l()T IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll 18/87/85
• *
• It.MN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCV REPORT SURRY UN IT e COD* A 03/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A02303 PERIHSSIVE STATUS LISHT INDICATI~

ARE INCCJEISTENT. HMIN ERROR: MV CAUSE~ TO SYSTEIII DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPO NSE. 1H PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: ENS II -5 SOI£ STATUS LIGHTS INDICATE DESIRED STATUS liiEN LIGHTS ARE IUIJIINATED, OTHERS WHEN THEY A RE OFF. 1700 PARAGRAPH NUfi!BER: E..5.3. l.C SUS6ESTED BACKFIT: DETER,tINE l'IOST ADVANTAGEOUS CONDITIONS FOR CR PERSONNEL FOR VERIFICATION OF STATUS AND USE ~ISTENTLY THRLOUT. DISPOSITION: STUDV/RE-DESIGN TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY, IN TERPIS OF ILLUM/LOCS OF LTS ARE CORRECT , I.E., PE~ IN PE~ <REAARKS). COORDINATE WITH DS-29-F9 (20A01313)

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJPIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY ~RKS: PI-69. DISP: COL~ BYPASS IN BVPASS COLIJIIN ITEMS INVO... VED: LOCATION COAPONENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM PERIIIISSIVES H NOT IN INV FILE t 03/17/86 02/28/86 ** -tif.lMN Eh61NEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 COD£ *
• ASSESSl9T LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2eA823l4 CClffR(L STATUS LISHT ~INS IS Ir<<:ONSISTENT ti.A ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN DETERMINING EQUIPIENT STATUS Hf PROa.EM DESCRIPTION:

COMPLT CWIR/POSTN OF STATUS LTS INCOOISTENT W/ OTHER W CTRLS6RN/Ya=DIVERT/1i1Atf.JAL, R£D/6RN=NOR "' DIV/NOfllil=L.EFT/RT. 8718 PARAS~ NJ~R: 6. 5. 3. 1, C 6. 6. 6. 3 6. S. 1, 6. D, 1 6. 5. 1. 6. D. 3 SUSGESTED IR:KFIT: REVISE TO BE CONSISTENT fff DISPOSITION: SOC STATES NO PROB LEAVE AS IS, OPS FAl'IILlAR W/ WS, USED TO WAY EA li<<JRKS. NO CO NVENTION FOR NOR!lt-DIVERT IR!IIRKSI MTA cou.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NU!JIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS ~D LOl:ATION AIDS SURVE:Y TP-8,1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RB!ARKS: PI-71H. POS. TO ESTABLISH ONE 1'116HT CAUSE PROBS (N£6 XFER), I TEJilS INVCl. VED: IIIARK NJIIIBER LOCATION COIJIOrENT FM 1£\1-1244 LV-l15A TCV-11~3 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEPI 07/11/85

• *
• EN6INEERltE DlSC~Y REPORT . 03/17/86 SURRY lJHT 0 CODE A ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A02~7 SYS/EQUIP STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEitE IFF, HUMAN ERROR: ERRORS IN IPERATOR RESPONSE FRI)! ERRONEOUS ASSIJIPTIOHS CF P UWT STATUS DUE TO BURNED 00T nBS tff PROBL.91 DESC~IPTION:

t<<JD II -5 SYSTEIII/EOOIPll!ENT STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEitE OFF INSTEAD OF IU~lrflTED. 0700 PARAGRAPH MJIIIBER: 6.5.J, 1.C SOOSESTED BOCKFIT: EVll.UATE CONSEQUENCES OF IIIISJUD6EIENT DUE TO THIS PROBLEM AND IF POTENTIAL 14lZARD, REVERSE *** DISPOSITION: ADD TO PERIODIC TEST 26.1 FOR DAILY TESTING, NOTE: FAULT IN RADIATION SAPIPL.ER FILTER IS INDICATED BY LIGHT EEINS ON. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.IMBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-68-2. ITEMS INVCl..VED: FILTER FAll.T RAD SAl'!PLER IIDIS INVOI.. VED: NARK NUMBER LOCATION COJll)()N£NT NAJI£ SYSTEI'! SUBSYSTEM FLTR FAULT H NJT IN INV FILE 1 / 03/17/86

• *
• HUMAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY LWIT0 CODE B ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------------------

---

21A82319 INADEQIJATE cnfTRAST -LEGEND LIGHTS. ttM ERROR: FAILURE TO RECOONIZE EllJIPIIIENT STATUS *.. ' . . . Hf PROa.B1 DESCRIPTION1 ENS I -5 IU LEGEND LISHTS l>>I TURBINE CONTROL PAA£L INADEGUATE CONTRAST lfiEN LIT -OP REPORT -CDFIRIE) BY OBSERV. 1781 PARAGRAPH tUIBER: 6.5.3.3.A.1 QJ66ESTED BACl<FIT:

INCREASE INTENSITY CF INTERta ILLUMINATION. Hf DISPOSITION: IJJ6RADE SYS TO lr<<:REASE R£LIAB1LITY ENSURE PROPER ILLUIHNATION. REFER TO VD-5 (2311-1288), ~TA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.OO!ER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REIIIARl<S: E-31 I IDIS IIWCl. '.tlh !!ARK NJIIIBER LOCATI~ CQllllOIENT NA,£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TUR CNTR PN. ff t(JT IN INV FILE* 16/07/85

• *
• HU~ ~INEERIMJ DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE C 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REYIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82315 4YS/EOOIP STATUS IS INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEIMJ !FF. tl.R ERROR: ERRORS IN CP RE~ FD ERRIMClJS ASSI.JIIIPTIONS OF i:tANT ST ATUS DlE TO aJRNED CXJT BULBS. fff PROllEM DESCRIPTICl4:

ENS III-9 SYSTOOEOOIMNT STATUS ff INFERRED BY INDICATOR LIGHT BEIMJ OFF INSTEAD OF ILLUflINATED, UN PARAGRMi Nl.lltilER: 6.5.3.1.C St&ESTED ~IT: EWUJATE CONScOOEtaS iJf f!IISJUD69!£NT DUE TO THIS PROBLEM AND IF POTENTIAL HAZARD, REVERSE fff DISPOSITICl4: PERIODIC TESTIMJ AND BULB ~INS IS PERFORMED AS REQUIRED. REFER TO PI-69 (20A 023a3), .DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD* NUPIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURYEY -RaJARKS: PI-68-1 ITBIS I rMl.'S: -JIIARK NLIIBER LOCATION COlflONENT NAIE PERMS ST LTS TAVE DELTA T ff r<<lT IN INV FILE

• ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM

/ 02/14/86

• *
• ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY 1.,me CODE C 02/28/86 ASSESSf!ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2481 RECORDERS f<<lT LOCATED IN PRIMRY IJlERATING AREA. IUllN ERROR: JIIAY CAUSE DELAYS IN (J)ERATOR RESPONSE FRI)! INABILITY TO VERI FY TRENDS. fH PROl!lEN DESCRIPTION:

RECORDERS REQUIRED FOR USE BY OPERATORS t<<JT LOCATED IN THE PRI~RY OPERATING AREA. 8788 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5. 4.1. H St66ESTED BACKFIT: III-8 DETERIIIIt£ SUITABLE RELOCATION IF RECORD£RS AND RELOCATE. PROVIDE REDUNDANT INSTIMIENTATION IN OPERATil'E AREA. fH DISPOSITION: Ill ~Tit)l-{P TIME TO 60 TO !{TR DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-5.l DISPLAYS SURVEY REMAll<S: PI-76-1. ITEMS INYll.VED: HEAT-LIP & COCl.. D'JlRT RECORD£R I TENS INYCl. ~lh JIIARK NIIBER LOCATICJI COfilPOtENT IXKl..M ACRD tEAT I.JI RCRD ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f ff l'<<lT IN INV FILE f SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM 82/lit/85

• *
• ttJPIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSti!ENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A82482 RECORDER WINDCMS IIJST BE IJlENED TD READ DATA. tUIAN ERROR: IIAY CAUSE DELAY/ERROR IN IJIERATOR RESPaEE DUE TO ~TIO N FOi DIWIGE/DIRT IN CPENED WINDCMS Cf' RECORDERS.

II* PROll.EJII-DESCRIPTION: EN6NOD II -6 !P£RATORS 111.JST OPEN RECORDERS TO READ DATA BE~ LABELS OBSCURE WINIXJilS. WINDOWS DIRTY/D ~/SCRATD£D/61.ARE 8718 PARAG~ IUIB£R: 6.5.4,1.K SU66ESTED -BACKFI T: REPUa: ill l(JRN/DAn:IGED/DIRTY/SCAATCHED WINDOWS. REt.ABa. USE NON-61.ARE SLASS. PERIODIC fll AINTENAt<<:E DECKS. II* DISPOSITION: REPUU 9-ASS, !llVE LE6£NDS, DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTIOO AND CODE r<<JIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI.-78 ITEMS INYII..VED: IIARK fUIIIER LOCATION COflSlONENT r9E FEED Fllll NR-45 CNIS) P6 BA RAD D6 S6 WR'S STBII FLCl4 TE!ll£RATURE ff "1T IN INV FILE-f ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff "1T IN INV FILE f ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff "3T IN INV FILE f ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE f SYSTEN SUBSYSTEM (U/30/86

---

• *
• ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT e CODE B 03/17/86 ASSESS.llfENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29Ae2W RECORDER PENS Cl.CE, INK 9IUD6ES PAPER. HJIAN ERROR: ..UI.KTIONIN6 EGUIPMENT lllY REDOCE RELIABILITY OF TREND DAT A, !!CREASES PROBABILITY CF CJIERATOR RE~ ERRORS fff PROBl...9!

DESCRIPTION: NOD II -6 CONTINUOUS FLIII PENS PICK UP LINT FRO'I PAPER AND CLOO. Wl£N REFILLING PENS, IN< SKJDSES TR END PAPER, 8710 PARAGRAPH NJ~R: 6.5.4,1,A SU66EST8> BACKFIT: REPLACE RECS. W/ THERl'l, /HEAT SENSITIVE RECS., PENS W/ REFILLABLE CARTRID6£ Fa T TIPS, PAPE R W/ HIGHER OUAI...ITY. fff DISPOSITION: REPLOCE PENS WITH FELT TIP CARTRIDGES, AS REQUIRED

• DATA CCUECTION

~SCRIPTIO'i AND CODE NU!IIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REAARKS: PI-79 ITOO INVOLVED: Lil DISCH FLO IESAWATT 11:S COLD WRT RCS lllT WR T LOCATION COfi!PONENT NAl'IE ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN IrN FILE t SVSTEl'I SUBSYSTEM 03/17/86

• *
• tlMW ENSINEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2'A82414 RECORDER PERFORM<<:E INADE~TE.

ttR ERROR: IIIAY r.AUSE LOSS Cf HISTORICR. TREND DATA DUE TO IIR.FI.JICTIONIN 6 EQUIPfENT, lff PROSL91 DESCRIPTI~: NOD II -6 PENS UP/STIU AT*~ ENDS. PENS CL~ WITH PAPER LINT. PAPER SLIPS ON FEED ROLL. NEE DlE CATDES. 87N PARASRAPH N.JIIBER: 6,5,4. l.A !ll66ESTED BACKFIT: CORRECT PEN/PAPER/tEEDLE PROBLEJIIS. ESTABLISH AND IIIIPLEIENT PERIODIC AAlNTENAtCE CHEO<S. lff DISPOSITION: IIIRS WILL BE WRITTEN AS REQUIRED. PERIODIC IIIAINTENIKE HAS BEEN ll'IPLEIENTED

• DATA COLLECT!~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEV IDARKS: PI-88 IIDS INYCl. VED: IIIA~ tolBER LOCATION CClflPOPENT P250 TRS RAD IOI SYS ~rap RCP VIB WSST ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NlT IN INV FILE f ff NlT IN INV FILE f ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM 01/30/86

• *
• ttlfllAN Ž3IN£ERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A82~ lll>ACT RECORDER RESPC>>tSE THE TOO LllE. KMAN ERROR: , DELAYED RESP!HIE TH£ IIAY ADVERSE!..

Y ~FECT 1))8, DEC I SI~ INS Cl¥)ABILITIES Hi DETERJIIININ6 CORRECTIVE OCTIONS. 1H PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: ENS III-8 SWITCH SELECTABLE, PIIUL TIP!.£ CHlMEl. RECORDERS ll£l.AY BETWEEN TlJliE INPUTS SELECTED AND PARAMETERS DISPLAYED. 8788 PARAS~ IUIBER: 6.5.4.2.B.

Ql66ESTED BACKF IT

INVESTI~TE IIIIPROVIM3 CIRCUIT RESPONSE THIES AND ADJUST /l()DIFY AS REQUIRED.

1H DISPOSIT'ON: IIJDJFY OR REPI.Ja: DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE MJIBER: rP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY r191ARKS: PI-81 ITEMS INVll.VED: NARI< NJ&R LOCATI~ COfllOtOT SYSTE/lf ff r()T IN Iflv FILE t SUBSYSTEJII 02/14/85

• EMJINEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODEC ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2418 Ill>OCT RECORDER RESPONSE TUE TOO LIIE. ...,_ ERROR: DELAYED RESPIH!E THIE ll!AY ADVERSELY

~FECT CPS. DECISIIJHA< IN6 Cll>ABILITIES IN DETERIIIININ6 CORRECTIVE ACTICN,. Hf PROllal DESCRIPTION: EN6 III-9 SWITCH SELECTABLE. IIIUI. TIPlE DffMEL RECORDERS HAVE DELAY Be:TIEEN TH£ Ifj)UTS SELECTED IWD PARAIETERS DISPLAYED. 1788 PARAGRAPH ~R: 6.5.4.2.B.4 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: INVESTIGATE IIIIPROVIN6 CIRCUIT RE~ WIES AND ADJUST/MODIFY AS REQUIRED. Hf DISPOSITION: !ML£ ll<<R P-258 UPSRADE PROORAJII. SEE PI -98 (20000301 >

• DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NIJIIIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY IEIAll(S: PI-&1 ITEMS IfMl.VED: -. MIIK tUIBER LOCATION C()fll()f£NT rM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM P258 TRS ff "1T IN INV FILE * / 02/14/85

• *
• HUMAN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B t£D f(J TITLE 21A12411 I~~TE C!MiTRAST

-IN< CO.ORS tUllN ERROR: MISREAD TRENDS. fff PRO!l.91 DESCRIPTIO.: 02/28/86 ' ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONS lB I LI TY STATUS DATE NOD II -6 "6/07/85 GREEN PEN ON TR-1-433 -INADE(ljlTE CONTRAST COO!W;T BU£ PEN ON TR-1-409B -INADEOOATE Hf S7N PA~ N.Jfl8£R: 6.5.4,2.A.2 SUGGESTED BACKF 1T: USE DARKER Ift< DISPOSITION: ~IN CTRI..S TO ENSURE HI6H ll#LITY PAPER INK USED WITH PAPER l!IAINTENANCE. RE FER TO PI-79 !2Wle2403> !R9IRKS1 DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUPIBER: TP-5, l DISPLAYS SURVEY ~RKS: E-32. DISP: 20A02403 RECCllflENDS FELT TIP TYPE INKING. IT91S INVCl. 1,9: MRK tUIBER LOCATION im>l'.JNENT tM: TR-1-4898 TR-1-433 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE

• H r<<JT IN INV FILE* SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM
• *
• Ill~ Etf3INEERI"1i DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 21Ai2411 llillE~TE cmTAST -IMPACT RECORDER ti.A ERlllR: READING ERRORS. fff PAOILEJII DESCRIPTION:

PRINTER I§ INADe:IXJATE CONTRAST -CPEAATOR COMNT, COtflRIED THRll&iT OBSERVATION. 07N PARAGRAPH UBER: 6. 5. 4. 2. .B. 3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: II -6 DETEffll!IfE SOURCE IF PROB -INCREASE Ili!PACT FORCE ~/OR REPUll/REPLENISH INK SUPPLY ~/0 R USE DARKER Ht<. fff DISPOSITION: SUBIT MR TO FDIX RCROR Pe:R BACl<FIT, ENSURE ADl'IIN CONTROLOVER RCRDRS. HIBH 001l.IT Y ll'f( ~R TO BE USED

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~

CODE NUPIBER: TP-5,l DISPLAYS SURVEY RalARKS: E-33. moo: RCP TE.!I> RCRDRS) I TENS I NIJCl. lJED 1 ~RK rtJIIIBER LOCATION~ NllE . SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H tfJT IN INV FILE* TR-1-448 TR-2-448 RM.315 RECORDER ~TOR COCl.ANT <PRH!ARY LOOP, PWR) SYS ~TOR COOLANT PtM>S ~/07/85

• *
• HlMAN ENGINEERING DISCREAA'CY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B l£D NO TITLE 2A2414 RECORDERS NOT LOCATED IN PRIMARY CPERATIN6 AREA. K.-ERROR: DELAY iN (J) RESPOOSE.

tff PROILEIII DESCRIPTION: TREND RECORDER IS !GILE, ON A CART. 1718 PARASRAPH rtl"8ER: 6.5.4.1,H SU66ESTED BACKFIT: 02/28/86 ASSESS/JIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG I -2 07/11/85 DETERIIIINE SUITABLE RELOCATION Cf RECORDERS AND RELOCATE. PROVIDE REDlNlANT INSTRUIIENTATION IN CJlERATING AREA. tff DISPOSITION: PEAMArENT INSTALLATION ON BErOi SOARD N£AR FW STATION

• DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE !UBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY ~S: PI-76-2 ITENS INUCl.VED:

MRI< ttJIIBER LOCATION COll>OPENT NAIE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM S6 LVL NR TR ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t

• *
• llWW ENSINEERlrE DISC11£PANCY REPORT 12/28/86 SURRY UNITI CODE ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A8241S DISPLAY LOCATED TOO HIGH ON PHL. * ..__ ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJ> RESPONSE.

fff PROllEN DESCRIPTION: DISPLAY LOCATED TOO HIGH ON PAPEL, .UST USE STCD. TO READ TO AVOID PAIR.LAX AND 6LAR£.. Hf 1799 PARAGRAPH NIMBER: 6.1.2.5.B SOOGESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATED DISPLAY TO LOWER LOCATION. DISPOSITION: DEL£TE-fRON INTERVIEW RESPONSE, IJ> REFERRED TO INDICATORS W/ l'IIRRORED SCIUS. TH ESE ARE BEi.CM 71", NOT FREQ USED DATA CDU.fCTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-1.2 ~THROPOETRICS SURVEY R81ARKS: PI-21-6 ITBIS IrMl.lJED: !ARK NJNBER LOCATION COf!POt£NT ,-SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII PWR Rt..6 EFFL H MJT IN INV FILE I CDIPL.T ~/17/85

• *
• 1tJ1A1 a.6INEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82583 IfAIEUTE VIEWIN6 ANGLE -ro..NTERS tUAt ERROR: READING ERIERS 1H PAOa.EM DESCRIPTION:

EN6 I -5 j ClllfTERS ARE ttJT IOMED PEAPENDICLlAR TO CPERATOR LOS -ll.SO EXC£SSIYELY RECESSED FROM PA ,a SURF~. 8781 PARAGRAPH ttJIIBER: 6.5.5.1.B. l 6.5.5.1.B~*, SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE DISPLAYS TO LPPER BEfOiBOARD OR CAN'T DISPLAY UPWARD APPROX 38 DEGREES. 1H DISPOSITI~: PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DI6ITI-\. READOUT FOR CONTROL ROD BAtf< POSITION INDICATORS

• DATA cw.ECTia.

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NIJIIIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY 19ARKS: E-34. (CIJIT ROD BAN< DEii POSTN INDICATORS BATCH INTEGRATORS> ITBIS INVCL',fD: MAK IUIIER ux:ATIOH COlflOf£NT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff ttJT IN INV FIL£ t 16/07/85

• *
• ttR EN6INEERIN3 DISCREPA,CY REPORT SURRY UNIT8 CODE C 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82981 Il<<llllrE IURJIIS r<<JT PRIORITIZED IN CR. ltJIIIAN ERROR: ERROR/DELAY IN !PERATOR RE~S tff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:

ENS III-8 r<<l ~DITORY PRIORITIZATION IF INXJ1IN3 IURfl SIWUi IN CR. (PS. ATIEND IU SISNLS AS EQU ll. I~T. fH 8710 PARAGRMi ttJMBER: 6.3.1,4,A.l 6.3.1.4,A.2 6.3.2.2,B SU66ESTED BACKF IT: ESTABLISH LEVELS IF PRIORITIZATI!R PROVIDE AUDITORY Sl!Nl. DIFFERENTIATION FOR ~ICATO R~ DISPOSITION: I(] PRIORITIZATION RECOll£ND£D. REFER TO N.w STUDY PER Pl-2 (20Ae2101l AND Pl-8 5 ( 28Ala21 fiJ6 J , DATA COU£CTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE rumER1 TP-3,1 ~ICIATOR SVSIDIS REVIEW TP-1,6 ~IENT NOISE SURVEY PI-35. I TEJIS I NVll. lJED: -.IIARK fUIBER LOCATION CQllllllf£NT fM: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM H r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t i U/11/85

• • * * ----------------------------------

tlfflAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 0 CODE A 03/20/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------*-----*----------

---

20A02902 PANEL AUDITORY ALARM SIGNALS TOO LOUD/HIGH PITCHED. HUmN ERROR: MY CAUSE ERRORS IN OPERATOR'S RESPONSES DUE TO IRRITATION F PANEL ALARJ!!S, Hf PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:

AUDITORY ALARfl SIGNALS ARE TOO HIGH PITCHED AND TOO LOUD. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.3.2. l,C SUS6ESTED BACKFIT: ENS II ADJUST PNL ALARMS TO l0DB<A> ABOVE AMBIENT NOISE LVL AFTER HED 2000-0004 RE!lJ!lil4ENDATIONS A RE EVALUATED/RESOLVED fff DISPOSITION: FIX AS PER SU6GESTED BACKFIT

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N1.114BER:

TP-3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW RE~RKS: PI-'46 ITE~ INVOLVED: AUX*YENT PNL FIRE PROT PN P250 CfllPTR RADO SYS SMO<E DET PN LOCATION CQIIIPONENT ff NOT IN INV FILE f HNOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE f SVSTEIII SUBSYSTEM 07/11/85

• * * .tUIAN EtEINEERINi DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE A 02/28/86 ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW t£D t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2983 t<<l U>Illl.E UIIH:LEARED SIIMl. FOR AN<<.KIATOR SYSTB!. 11M ERROR: DELAYS IN IJIERATOR*AE!iPO',SES Hf PROIUN DESCRIPTION:

'ENG II -5 Tf£AE IS t<<l ~DIBLE CLEARED IUIRM SISfR ON ANN.JC SYS <t<<l YISI.R. IURfl -LIGHTS GOES OU T lfEN a.EARED. I 8711 PAAASRAPH IUIBER: 6.3.1.5,A !IJ66ESTED BACKF IT: ~TE FEASIBILITY CF l!IIPWENTINS AUDITORY CLEARED ALARM FUfCTION TO PRESENT SYSTEM. Hf DISPOSITION: INYESTISATE FEASABILITY IF INSTALLIN6 CLEARED ~Afflll SIS DATA cw.ECTIDN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJll!BER: TP-3,1 ANIIJIICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW REMARKS1 PI.--51. JUSTIFY IF t<<lT INSTAU.ED, ITENS INYCL~: MRK ftl&R LOCATION COfllOf£NT l'9E SYSTEM SUBSYSTBI _,. CNTLS ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t 11/17/85

• KJNAN ENSINEERI!'.G DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY IT 0 ClJDE A 03/17/86 ASSES~NT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ------------------------

---

28A02904 TOO ~y ltlI~ ALARlilS IN CR, r<<J LOCK-OO'T CAPABILITY PROVIDED l(Jll'.IN ERROR: DELAYS/ERRORS IN OPERATORS RE~S DUE TO INABILITY TO DIS CRIPIATE BETWEEN I~RT~ CF ALARJI! CONDITIONS fff PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION:

' ENG II -5 SOfE ALAR,115 SO FREllJENT THEY ARE CONSIDEffC'..D t<<JISAPCE, NO LOCIHlJT FUNCTION FOR OUT-OF-SERV ICE SYSTEl'IS/EQUIP 1780 PARAGRAPH M.JPIBE:R: 6,l,1,2,A,1 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: Mi...~TE/READJUST SETPOINTS FOR UR"5 LISTED, PROVIDE LOCIHXJT FOCTION FOR OUT-DF-SERVIC E SYS/EllJIP fff DISPOSITION: PERFORPI EN6INEERIN6 STUDIES TO~ SETPOINTS, ETC *

• DATA CfA.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CllDE NIJIIIBER:

TP-3. 1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW REPIARKS: PI-51 I IDIS INVOL YED: URPIS ~TI-fLDG AL llA FLO DEY ll.NDR FLOW HI-LY SCR NR HT TRCG TRBL. UO COND LL LOOSE PARTS LP DT DEY P250 Ufllll POLSH BD TRB RCP SEAL-Ul STl'I FLO IE/lfT *T-AVE,REF DY T/B SUl'IP TURB SUlt.P PM LOCATION ClJPPONENT NAAE ff NOT IN INY FILE t HNOT IN INY FILE t ff NOT IN INY FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INY FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INY FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INY FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INY FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INY FILE t tt NOT IN INV FILE t sYsm1 SUBSYSTEM 03/17/86

• l£D NO: 29A02904 ITEMS INYll.VED:

IIARK ru.BfR WTR FLO DEV *

• LOCATION COPIPONENT NAJIIE lf.J~ ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 0 SYSTEll! ff f()T IN INV FILE t 03/17/86 SUBSYSTEM
• **
• H.JIAN EN3INEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al29l7 IN!lffICIENT RESPCWSE TUE FDR NKIATDR ~. tUIAN ERROR: MY CAUSE COSTLY SYSTOOEOOIMNT REPAlRS AND/OR EXPOSE PERS IH£l. TD SAFETY ~ZARDS. I 1H PRO!lSI MSCRIPTIDN:

II -7 ANft.N:IATDR ~RIIIS DO "1T IUo. fl)ERATORS ErG.QiT TIIE TD RESPCN> TO A ~RNirE CONDITION. 1H 1718 PARA6RAPH NlJlf£R: 6. 3.1. 2. A. 2 S006ESTED BAD<FIT: ~TE flAAIII AND ADJUST SETPOINTS URIIS THAT DO "1T 1EET*6UID£Lit£S. DISPOSITIC*: ~TE flAAIII SETPOINTS FOR ADEll<<Y OF RESPIN!E TIIE AND ADJUST SETPOINTS ACC DRDIH6LY * ~TA c:ru.ECTIIJI DESC:RIPTIIJIAND CODE NJflf£R: TP-3.1 Art<<.WICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REJIIAAKS: PI-53 ITENS INY0.VED1 MIIK fUlf£R LOCATIIJI CQlll)(J£NT ,-SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM AWST LO LVL .H "1T IN INV FILE f 15/28/85

• *
• tlM EN6INEER1N6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~ITI CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED I() -TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IAa29l8 INSlfFICIENT RESPIJEE TIIE FOR NJCIATOR Ull6. llMAN ERROR: fllAY CAUSE COSTLY SYSTEM/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS AND/OR EXPOSE PERS INEL TO SfHTY tf!ZARDS.

fff PROIIL.EN DESCRIPTION: EN6 II -7 IMUCIATOR URflS DO NJT ~OW IPERATORS Eta.&t TIIE TO~ TO A IIRRNIN6 CONDITICli. 87N ~RAPH OBER: 6. 3.1. 2. A. 2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: £i.q~TE UlRM AND ADJUST SETPOINTS ON IURMS THAT DO r<<JT IEET GUIOO.IrES. fff DISPOSITION: ~TE ADDIN6 ABt<<JIIR. LEVEL NKIATOR, WR LEVEL !KAT, DATA cw.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE IUBER: TP-3. 1 f.lffOlCIATOR SYST91S REVIEW RBIAll(S1 Pl-53 I TENS INYILYED: _ fllAIIK IUBER LOCATION COll>Or£NT ,-CAT TAN<-ff NlT IN INV FILE I SYSIDI I SUBSYSIDI 15/28/85

• *
• EtEINEERIIE DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNIT@ lllllE B 02/28/86 A$ESS1ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A829l9 INSlfFICIENT RESPC>>ISE TIIE FOR IMJCIATOR URMS. 11.R ERROR1 NAY CAUSE COSTLY SYSTEJII/EQUIPIENT REPAIRS IWD/OR EXPOSE PERS CN£L. TO SAFETY ~ZARDS. fff PROJl.91 ~SCRIPTIClt:

II -7 NUCIATOR IUlfM3 DO MJT OPERATORS oo.&i TIME TORESPOa> TO A WARNIIE COHDITIClt. 8718 PARA6RAPtl IUUER: 6. 3. 1. 2. A. 2 SU66ESTED ~IT: ewl.~TE EACH ALAR1i! ADJUST SETPOINTS ON ~ARJl!S. T~T DO N OT fllEET 6UIDELH£S. '*' DISPOSITION: ~TE 1LARM SETPOINTS FOR AD£000CY IF RE!lm& ADJUST ~RDitELY

• DATA ro.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-3.1 lltfOICIATOR SYSTEIE REVIEW PI-53 ITENS INYCLVED 1 NARK NJlilER LOCATION (Dl)()ENT tfllllE SI~ H/L L H NH IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTE!II 85/28/85
• *
• HI..R EN6IN£ERI"6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B ~/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED 1(1 TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A82911 INSlFFICIENT RESPOEE THE FOR INU<<:IATOR ilJIR,15.

IUIAN ERROR: IIAY CAUSE COSTLY SYSIDVEOOIMNT REPAIRS IWD/OR EXPOSE PERS IHEl.. TO SAFETY ~ZARDS, 1H PROBt.91 DESCRIPTIOH: EN6 II -7 l*.JCIATOR DO r(JT AU.OI CPERATORS Eta.SH WE TOR£SP(M TO A WARNI"6 COOITICW. 978e PARAGRAPH Nl/lllBER: 6 * .l, 1, 2, A. 2 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: / ~UATE ll.ARM SETPOINTS ON ll.ARJIIS THAT DO ~T IEET 6UIDELINES. 1H DISPOSITION: ~TE ILARM SETPiJINTS FOR ADEr.UOCV OF RESPONSE AND ADJUST ACCORDINSLY. COORDI NATE WITH PI-71-12 i2eA82215), DATA COLLECTION DESCRlPTI()II AND CODE NUIIIBER: TP-3,l IWf.JNlCIATOR SYSTalS REVIEW REJIARKS: PI:-53 ITBIS IrMl. ',tD: ~i.< l'UllER LOCATION COtlPClt£NT t9E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM BAST HI L\11. ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t 11/11/85

• * * ~IIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DJSCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY LWIT0 CODE TITLE 2.IA82911 IN9.FFICIENT REsm&: TIIE FOR INUCIATOR

~. . II.JAi ERROii: MY~ COSTLY SYSTEM/EOOIPfENT REPAIRS AND/OR EXPOSE PERS <HEl. TO SAFETY HAZARDS. Ht PROll.EM IEK:RIPTIOlf: 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE CQIIIPt.T 05/28/85 IMI.N:IATOR DO tt'.IT CPERATORS EtOJiH THE TOR£Sm4> TO A WARNIN3 CONDITION. 8711 PARA6IWlti IUIBER: 6.3.1.2.A.2 SU66ESTED BOCKFIT: ~TE EAai AHD ADJUST SETPOINTS ON~ THAT DO MJT fllE£T SUIDaINES

• .._ DISPOSITICJt:

SYSTEM DESIGN COOTRAINT -CAN'T DO ANYTHI~ DATA auECTI!l4 DESCRii>TICJt AND CODE UBER: TP-3. 1 ANOICIATOR SYSTOO REVIEW REJIAll(S: PI-53. I TEJIIS INIJCL \{Jh MRK fUIIIER LOCATIOlf CIJll()ENT rM 6PT t£AT HI FLD FRC6 ALA FW HTR IUIRtl IP HTR DRN P 0' EXCITATIOlf ff tt'.IT IN IIN FILE* ff NJT IN I!N FILE 1 ff NlT IN INV FILE* ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff tt1T IN I!N FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

• *
• EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPIM:Y REPORT SURRY UNITB CODE C 02/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW t£D Ml TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 21A12912 IN9.FFICIENT RESP TIIE FOR REQUIRINS llJTSIDE Ir.FCIRMATICW ltR ERROR: ll£LAYS JIIAY CAUSE COSTLY EGUIPflENT

~SAFETY ~RD ID PE RSOf£L. 1H PIUUII D£SCRIPTI0N: III-9 NUCIATOR REGUIRIN6 INFO FR()! ClJTSIDE CR 00 NJTIUOW Sl.fFICIENT OPERATOR RESPOtif TUE. 87* PARA6RAPH r<<JIIIB£R: 6.3.1,2,B.l 6.3,1,2.B.2 9.166ESTED SACl<f IT: ~TE SETPOINTS FOR ALARIIIS AND ADJUST ACCORDINSL.Y.

• • • DISPOSITION:

NJ ~TICW -THERE ARE OPERATORS IN CONDENSATE PO..ISH1"13 .BUILDINS TO RESPOND TO A LARM. DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJIIIBER: TP-3. 1 ArftMICIATOR SYSTOO REVIEW ~Rt<S: PI-54. ~ER CPS REVIEW RE-EVALUATE AT HEDAT LEVEL IIDIS INYO. YED: ~AK OBER L.OCATil>>I COfllOt£NT ,-BET~ PCl. I' F,.;INS ILR ~IN CTIL SD ff r<<JT IN lrN FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff l<<lT IN IrN FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 98/97/85

• *
• ltM EN6IfEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNITi CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED l'(J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al2913 INSlFFICIENT RESPCl4SE TIIE FOR~ REIIJIRINS CIJTSIDE IhfOR,IATIO ltJAI ERROR 1 DELAYS JIIAY r.AUSE COSTLY EQUIPIENT JlAIIA3E/SAFETY

~ZARD TO PE RS(NEL. / Hf PROILal DESCRIPTION: ENS II -6 ANN.M:IATOR URNS RE1lJIRIN6 INFO FR()! CIJTSIDE CR DO N1nU.()l SUFFICIENT OPERATOR RESP(JEE TIIE. 17N PARASIW>H NJNBER: 6.3.1,2,B, l 6.3.1,2,B,'2 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: £\q~TE SETPOINTS FOR URNS~ ADJUST ACCORDINGLY, fff DISPQSITI~: N:ED WIDER RAN6E INDICATION !>>I DISPLAY, REFER TO PI-72-2(20A02202)

• DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION IN> CODE IUIBER: TP-3. 1 IMO,IICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW R01AA<S: PI-54-2 !TENS IN\,U.VED1 MARK r<<JNSER LOCATION COll)(KHT NAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM TURB LO VAC ff r<<JT IN IIN FILE t 18/97/85
• *
• tUIAN EN6INEERIN3 DISC11£PAi'£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT8 CODE B t£D NO TITLE 28Al2914 INSlFFICIEHT RESPCHlE TII£ FOR URIIIS REIIJIRINS OOTSIDE Irt=OIWITIO 11M ERROR: DELAYS IIAY COSTLY £QUIPIENT

~5'¥=ETY ~ZARD TOP£ RSCN'El. 1H P1Ul.91 .DEOCRIPTII*: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST R£YI£W RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -6 08/07/85 IMUCIATOR REOUIRINi INFO F~ OOTSIDE CR DO rtmuow SUFFICIENT OPERATOR RE~ TIIE. 1718 PA~RAPH NJIIBER: 6.3.1.2.B. l 6.3.1.2.B,2 !IJ66ESTED BACl<FlT: Ml.~TE SETPOINTS FOR IURMS AND ADJUST ACCORDIN6LY. Hf DISPOSITI~: rEED 1¥>DITI!Nl. RAD flllH INDICATION IN CR

• DATA a:uECTICW DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-3.1 Aflt.NICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REYI£W REJl'.IRKS:

Pl-54 I TOO INVCL YED: MRI< IUIIER LOCATI~ COIRl.tENT tfW: SYSTEM HI RN6 EFFW HNOT IN IJN FIL£ t SUBSYSTEM .'

• *
• TITLE ti.IA £N6Ir£ERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNIT& CODE B 28Ael16 INSlFFICIENT RESPCJ4SE TIME FOR IUIRlilS REllJIRIN6 OOTSIDE It.FORIIATIO tulAN ERROR: DELAYS MY CAUSE COSTLY EOOIPIENT DAPRiE/SAFETY

~ZARD TO PE RSCMEL. 1H PROll.EN DESCRIPTl~: 02/28/86 A$ESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -7 08/07/85 INUCIATOR RE!lJIRIN6 If\fO F~ OOTSIDE CR DO l()TIUOW SUFFICIENT OPERATOR RESPC& TINE, 178& PARA6Rl¥lti rtJ!mER: 6. 3. 1, 2. B. l 6. 3. l, 2, B. 2 SIJ66ESTED BAO<F IT: INSTIU AUX STEAIII LOW PRESS ~. 141 DISPOSITION: INSTIU AUX STEAIII LO PRESS IUR,11, DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NI.MEER: TP-3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEMS RfVIEW RENARKS: PI-54-4 ITENS INVCl.VED: Ml< NMIIER LOCATic>>I IDflONENT tAIE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII IIJX STN LP H NlT IN INV FILE t

• * ** Jt.lll9l EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IA8292I RIVER BACK PM. URfl ()N(JT BE SEEN FRCJI PRIMARY lllRK AREA, COO..T tUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN CP RESPCNlE.

i fH PROa.91 DESCRIPTICJh RIVER PN1. URfil CJW(JT BE SEfN FRIJ! PRIMARY liORK AREA. OP MUST IA.I( TO & LOO< DIRECTL Y AT~ PN. TO SEE. 8718 PARAGRAPH IUIB£R: 6.3.1.1 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: INSTIU A REDI.N>ANT ALAR,! IN PRIMARY l<<JRK AREA TO AVOID EXCESSIVE OP l(}VEJIIENT. '** DISPOSITic>>f: 3RD LICENS£ AVAiuaE TO 0£0( ALARIII

• DATA cw.ECTION DESCRIPTic>>f AND CODE OBER: TP-1, 1 l<<IRKSM'.:E SURVEY REMARKS: PI-16 ITEJIS INVCLYED:

MARK MJNBER LOCATION COlllONENT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RIV BCK ll.RM H f()T IN INV FIL£ 1 07/15/85

• * *
• ltJIIAN EN6It££RIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE C 02/28/86 ASSESSl',ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A83882 mmn.s LOCATED TOO HIQl ~s KM ERROR: NAY CAUSE DELAYS/ERRORS IN CPERATOR RESPIM!E fft PAClll.9I DESCRIPTION:

III-9 CONTRB.S LOCATED too HISH IA<INS ADJUSTIOTS DIFFICLU ESPECIIUY DURirE EXTEHDED CPERATIO NS. 1718 PARAGIWIH NJIIBER: 6.1.2.5.A QJ66£STED BACl<F IT: MlYE CONTROLS THAT REQUIRED PRECISE ADJUSTIENTS LOWER, PROVIDE PORTABLE STEPS FOROTl£RS fft DISPOSITION: PROVIDE STEPSTOO.S. SEE 1.2-3 (22A83e38)

• DATA all.ECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE UBER: TP-1.2 ANTHRCJPOIIIETRICS SURVEY R91A1f<S: PI-17 ITBIS UMl.VED: -NA~ N.116l£R LOCATI~ COfllONENT rfllllE SYSIDI 2-YS-f-lA 2-VS-f-18 2-YS-f-lC IOHC-81A 1£Y-CC-281 B ICV-CC-282A 1£Y-CC-2828 NIS Pft. RI-RMS-151 RI-RMS-152 RI-fllll!H53 NAA846 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEJII NAA145 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATI~ SYSTEM NAB845 DISCRETE ROTARY IJENTILATII:* SYSTEJII NA8147 DISCRETE ROTARY COJIOf£NT an.Ir.a SYSTEJII H NJT IN IrN FIL£ t ff NlT IN INV FILE 1 ff NJT IN IrN FIL£ t ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<>T IN IrN FILE t ff r<<>T IN INV FILE I ff NJT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEJII 91/97/85

• • *
• l£D NO: 28A83tMa2 ITEJIIS INVCLYED:

ti.A Et.1iINEERirE DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNITi!I

• IRRK NJIBER LOCATION CIJlllmENT NAIE SYSIDI RI-RNS-154 RI-RM!H55 RI-Rfll!H56 RI-IIIS-157 RI -RMS-158 RI-RMS-261 RI-RNS-262 RI-RMS-263 RI -RJIIS-264 RI-SN-214 RI-511-215 RI-sw-216 RI-sw-217 ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE* HNOT IN INV FIL£ f ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 HNOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE* 02/28/86 SUBSYSIDI
• *
• HIJA ENSINEERINj DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT9 CODEC 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT UlST REVIEW TITLE REspCJNSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A838l3 a..TRll.S LOCATED TOO LOW ON PAr£1.S AND ARE IU<WARD TD CPERATE ti.MAN ERROR1 ~y CAUSE DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATDR IIESP{N!ES lff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:

ENS C(l{TR(LS ARE DIFFIClLT/IW<WARD TD CPERATE BECIUiE THEY ARE LOCATED TOO LOW DH PAfELS 07N PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.1,2.5.A Sl.66ESTED ~IT: III-8 DETERMINE CNTLS IIEQUIRIN6 PRECISE SETTit<<35 DR PROLOfEED IPERATIDNS RELOCATE HIHR DH PAf£LS Hf DISPOSITIDH: REFER TD 1.2-3 (22AIJ938), DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-1.2 ANTHROPOETRICS SURVEY REMM<S: PI-18 I TENS INIJCL YED: MRK fUIIER LOCATIDH COflla£NT SYSTEl4 SUBSYSTEM 1-YS-114A WABM6 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEJII l-YS-1148 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEM 1-YS-f-41 XMl46 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEM 1-YS-f-42 XABl45 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEJI 2-DH>-1A AAB216 IIIETER ctN>ENSATE SYSTEM 2-cN-P-lB AAC216 IETER CONDENSATE SYSTEJI 2-cH-P-1C AAA217 1£TER CONDENSATE SYSTEM 2-YS-114A WAA847 DISCRETE ROTARY YENTI LATI ON SYSTEJII 2-YS-184B IMM8 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEM 2-YS-f-41 XMl47 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SVSTEJI 2-YS-f-42 XMMa DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEJII 07/11/85 llJflAH EN6INEERJN6 DISCREPIKY REPORT 02/28/86

• SURRY UNITI 1£D.N01 2tA83803 IT91S INWl.YED1 NAI< UBER I.OCATI<* NAIIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSIDI

~o ff r<<JT IN INY FILE t ~T0/"'1N STA ff NOT IN INV FILE t FCY-2478 EAA212 PROCESS C:O.TIIUER FE£NITER SYSTEM STEAfl aaERATORS FCY-2.SS EAB212 PROCESS ~TIIUER FEEDWATER SYSTEM STEAfl SEIERATORS FCY-2498 EM213 PROCESS CONTRW.ER FEEDIIITER SYSTEN STEM GEhERATORS FCV-.:!55A FAA212 PROCESS CONTIIUER FEEDWATER SYSIDI STEAfl SEIERATORS FCY-2558 FAB212 PROCESS CONTRW.ER FEEMTER SYSTEM STEM SENERATORS FLV-255C FAA213 PROCESS ~TRW.ER FEEDWATER SYSTEM STEAfil GEtERATORS fllV-fS-22 ff NOT IN INV FILE* l(JY-ES-'38 ff NOT IN INV FILE t fllY-ES--67 ff NOT IN INV FILE

• NOV-ES-85 HNOT IN INV FILE t fllY-ES-95 ff NOT IN INV FILE t NRY-r4S-291A ff NOT IN INV FILE t NRY-f6-211B ff r<<lT IN INV FILE
• NRV-NS-?.tlC ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 !IJV-YS-111 YAA847 RELAY VENTILATION SYSTEfil
• SOY-VS-lllA YAAl45 RELAY VENTIL.ATI~

SYSTEM ! *

• TITLE EN6INEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY I.J. IT 0 CODE 28A83N4 STEA,! GENERATOR FLOW CONTROLS It<<nNENIENTLY LOCATED tl.R ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN O'ERATOR RESPCJ4SES Hf PRO~ DESCRIPTION:

03/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 I -3 03/17/86 ~TROLS LOCATED TOO CLOSE TOGETHER, ARE TOO CLOSE TO CONTROL ROD CONTROLS DUR!~ START-I.IP 0700 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6. 8. 2.1. A 6. 8. 2.1.B 6.8.2, 1.C Sl.6SESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE AS REQUIRED .Hf DISPOSITION: PROVIDE AUTO-BYPASS SYSTEl'I AND BYPASS FLOW INDICATION. ALSO PROVIDE TOTAL BYPASS FLOW INDICATION.

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M.Jll!BER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ TP-1,2 ANTHR!POMETRICS SURVEY REP.ARKS: PI-19-5. ITEMS INVOLVED: 1/FM-478A 1/Flll-478B 1/FPl-488A 1/Flll-488B 1/Ffl-498A 1/Flll-4988 FCV-2478 FCV-2488 FCV-2498 LOCATION COJIPONENT SYSTEfll HNOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t EAA212 PROCESS CONTROLLER FEEDWATER SYSTE~ EAB212 PROCESS CONTROLLER FEEDWATER SVSTE~ EAA213 PROCESS CONTROLLER FEEDWATER SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll STEAfil ~..NERATORS ST~ SENERATORS STEAM SENERATORS

• HED NO HUl'IAN ENSINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT 0 CODE A TIT~ 20A03e07 CCMROLS MY BE ACCIDENTALLY ACTIVATED BECAUSE CF POSIT!~~ CB. tt.R ERROR: ' ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATIO.

I fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION: 03/17/86 ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -5 03/17/86 CX>NTROLS ARE LOCATED WHERE POSSIBLE ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATION ~y OCCUR. 0700 PA~RAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.4.1. 2. 6 SU6SESTED BAD{FlT: INSTIU 6UARDS LISTED SWITCHES *** DISPOSITION: INSTALL A BJARDRAIL ON EDS£ OF BENCHBOARD

• *
• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS:

PI-56-1 I TEIIIS I NVIJL YED : 1l:B-15D1 ACB-15El 1l:B-15Fl RX~ CTRL LOCATION co,,p()NENT ff NlT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t SVSTEII! SUBSYSTEII!

• *
• TITLE HJIAH EN6IN£ERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNITi CODEC 2IAl38l8 COO'IU.S INTERLOCI<

UtECESSARILY, lUIAN ERROR: lllY CAUSE lHEC£SSARY DELAYS IN IJ>£RATOR RESPIHiE. Hf PR011.91 DESCRIPTICN'41 COO'RQ.S lH£C£SSARY INTERLOCKING IECtf!NISNS. 1711 PARAGRAPH fU1BER1 6. 4, 1, 2. D, 1 6. 4.1. 2. D. 2 Sl&ESTED r<<KFIT: 02/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE III-9 17/11/85 DETERf!ItE rECESSITY FOR INTERLOCKIPE ll£l)ffiISP1S, REKIVE WHERE APPROPRIATE. Hf DISPOSITICN'4: eA.~TE WITH EN6INEERIN6 STUDY IWD REKIVE IF APPROPRIATE

• DATA Cll.LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-4, 1 CONTROLS SURVEY IEWl<S: BA-C-1A BR-C-1B BR-P-7A BR-P-7B PI-58. SYSTEM LMl68 DISCRETE ROTARY BOO RECCJYERY SYSTEM UAAl69 DISCRETE ROTARY BO~ RECOVERY SYSTEJII TBAl68 DISCRETE IITARY BOD RECOVERY SYSTEN ff NJT IN INV FIL£ 1 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• tlJMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAl<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE B 82/28/86 ASSEss,ENl' LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al38l9 OB9l.ETE comas NIT ABIOVED FRfJI comn. BOORDS. EN6 KJAil ERROR: .DELAY/ERROR IN CONTRCL OCTI~ HI PIU!t.BI DESCRIPTIClh OBSlliTE CONTROLS REMAIN CONTROL BOARDS. 87N PAROORM'i NlMBER: 6. 4.1. 1. B.1 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:

R9IJVE lHJS£D CONTROLS HI DISPOSITION: INVESTIGATE RELOCATING, RELOCATE IF APPROPRIATE. DATA CCllfCTI~ DESCRIPTI!l'4 CODE l'UIBER: TP-4. 1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATI!l'4 AND VALIDATI~ ~RKSI PI""8-2. I TEJIIS INYCl. lJED: . ~AK rtJIBER LOCATI~ cc>>IP(IENT l9IE ff t(JT IN IrN FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEJII 1-YP-P-JA 1-YP-P-JB 2-IJP-P-JA 2-IIP-P-38 FCY-ES-185 FCV-£5-196 FCY-£S-ll7A FCV-£S-117B FCY-ES-285 FCV-£5-216 FCY-ES-217A DBA11l DISCRETE ROTARY PRIIIIItfi (WATER SIDE> SYSTEJII DBA113 DISCRETE ROTARY VACl.lM PRIMING IWATER SIDE> SVSTEJll ff t(JT IN IrN FILE 1 H r<<JT IN IrN FILE 1 H t(JT IN IrN FILE 1 H l'IJT IN INV FILE 1 H t(JT IN INV FILE f H t(JT IN INV FILE 1 H t(JT IN INV FILE 1 II -7 12/19/85 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• ITEMS IfMl..VED:

fAIIK NMBER L.OCATI~ CIJR>>IENT fAIE ltJtilAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCR£PA1CY REPORT SURRY ~ITI SYSTEM Fcv-ES-207B H r<<JT IN INV FILE* 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• tUIAN OOINEERIN6 DISC11EPA,f£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT8 CODE B HED l'<<l TITLE 21A13111 CNTIIL CCN=ISURATIIJE DO NOT IIATCH Dll£R CNTRI.S FOR SAME FIKTI~ IUAI ERROR: IELAYS/ERRORS IN !PERATOR RESPOEES Ht PROl!lEM DESCRIPTION:

coons DO P(JT MATCH OTl£R coons FOR SAi£ FIJCTI~. UN PARASRAPH UBER: 6.4.1, 1.C.2 6.4.2.2.C, 1 6.4.2.2.C.3 S006ESTED ~IT: -REARRAf&: CONTRCX.S TO !PERATOR EXPECTATIONS _.. DISPOSITI~: RELOCATE~ AE SWIT0£S Tl£ SAi£. DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE PUIBER: TP-4. 1 COfTRll.S 9.JRVEY REJIIM<S: RE-E~IJITE !¥=TEA D'96E CP/0 PI-62l IIDIS INYCl. \/ED: IM< OBER LOCATIOO t:DIO£NT rtlflE SYSTEM STM DRY~ ff P(JT IN INV FILE t / 02/28/86 ASS£SSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -6 81/U/85 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• 1t.M Eff3INEERIP6 DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW t£D r<<l TITLE RESro'ISIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A13112 mmn KtllBS/tAlllES ARE r<<lT DURAllt.E/SLIP LOOSELY CW SHAFTS. ltM ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN m>e:RATOR RESP(NiES fff PROll.EN DESCRIPTI~:

CORT CNTRL. Kr<<lBS/19dll.ES NJT DURAllE UNDER NJRIR/Ef£RSOCY SITUATI~. SCREWS LOOSEN/KNJTS SL IP LOOSELY SHAFTS. 17lil PARASRM1 fUIBER: 6.4.1.1,E.2 6,4,1.1,E.3 QJ66ESTED BACXFIT: PERFOia. PERIODIC IIIAINTENK£ DECKS. REPLll KNOBS/lf!NDLES PARTICULARLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO IEA R W/ IOI£ DURAIU CIES '*" DISPOSITI~: WRITE IIRS TO CORRECT PROBLal. RE-EVAL~TE AFTER ,iRS AR£ PROCESSED

• DATA au.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE !'UBER: TP-4. 1 CONTRO.S SURVEY R9Wl(S: PI-63 I TENS IN\IU. YED1 MAIi< IOIIER LOCATI~ CQlllOtENT tM SYSTEM 4161 E SW 4168 I SW FW BYP SWS SAi ON. SEL J-KIH sws OFF 1118 Y Plll-To-ux:K RAD 1G SYS 1119 DECADE ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff l(JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t ff l'()T IN INV FILE t . ff NJT IN INV FILE I ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM ll/U/85

• *
• ltJMN EN6INEERitf3 DISCREPAFCY REPORT SURRY 'UNIT@ CO~ A 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW t£D 1(1 TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al3813 C(l(TRll.S DIFFIQLT TO ADJUST TO PRECISE LEVEL REQUIRED tl.NlN ERROR: DELAYS OR ERRORS IN IPERATOR RESPCNiES

.. Hf PROll.BI DESCRIPTION: a>>ITRCl.S AR£ DIFFICtl.T TO ADJUST TO 1l£ PRECISE LEVEL REWIRED. 1718 PARAGRAPH OBER: . 6. 4. 1. 1. A. 2 Sl&lESTED MD<FIT: OOTRN I -1 PERIODIC IIIAINTEtflta CHECl<S. ANY CNTRLS. T~T ARE It#PROPRIATE FOR FIKTION OR AR E BRO<EN. lff DISP0SITION1 INYESTISATE FOR fWY IIIAINTE PROBS, ~IZE CTR!. DURIM3 TRAININ6, REFERS 6 LVL CTRl. TO PI-19-5 <~I DATA eot.LECTION DESCRIPTION~ CO~ NJIIIBER: TH, 1 C(l(TACl.9 SURVEY REIIIARKS1 PI -66. L~ FREQ 0:-USE ON IU llJT S6 L£VEL CNTRI.. CHS FLW CTIIL Ell8 IJCl.T ADJ at: TURB CTR FW FL II/A ST flf FW RES W PZR SPRA VVS 11:P SBl. INJ SEil. WTR INJ S6 BYP CTR!. S6 FL~ CTRL S6 LVl CTRL ff f(JT IN INV FILE t ff f(JT IN INV FILE t ff f(JT IN INV FILE t ff f(JT IN INV FILE t ff f(JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff f(JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff f(JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff f(JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII 88/07/85

• *
• IOR4 £N8INEERIN6 DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE A 82/28/86
• ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A83814 ruT-0:-sERVICE EQUIPIENT

~TRll.S f<<lT TA66EIHIJ'T IN CR IUIAN ERROR: ~y CAUSE DELAY/ERROR IN Cl>ERATOR RESPl)ISE. Hf PROll.9I DESCRIPTION: II -5 CNTl'-5. FOR OJT-a=-SERYICE EQUIP. f<<lT TA66ED IN CR. fCl YISIA. AIDS/REMINDERS T~T EQUIPIEN T IS ruT-<IF-sERYICE. 1711 PARAGRAPH tUIEER: 6.6.5, 1.D SU66ESTED ~IT: PROVIDE TA&-0.JT LABELS FOR ruT-0:-SERVICE COIIJONENTS. Hf DISPOSITION: PE~ SIHTY CONSIDERATIONS. REVIEW ADNIN PROC., IJl6RADE IF tECESSARY

• DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJIIAll(S:

PI-87 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM TA6 IIJT LBt.E H f<<lT IN IIN FIL£* 85/28/85

• *
• l£D NO TITLE llll!AN EM;It£ERIN6 DISCRE?At<<:Y REPORT SURRY I.NIT@ CODE AB 28AIJ823 EtC AESET/1.0CKClJT C0'4TRO. l~IENTLY LOCATED IUAI ERIIOR 1 t=..J.AY OR ERROR IN ~RATOR REsmEES Ht PRO't.91 DESCRIPTI~:

a£ RESET/LOO<OOT CONTRB.. LOCATED BEHIND YEATI~ BOARDS a*1 ee PARASRMi l'UIBER: 6. 8. 2. 1. A 6. 8. 2. 1. B 6. 8. 2. 1. C SUHSTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CONTRB.. NEAR EHC PAfEL ON BEtCHBOARD Ht DISPOSITlc>>i: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT ~T REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG I -3 11/02/85 INVESTISATE 0: RESET FOCTION OR RELOCATE TO OR t£AR EHC PANEL ON BB

• DATA ca.t.ECTia.

DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIQ:R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION TP-1.2 ~RICS SURVEY :£MRKS1 PI-19-15/16 ITEIIS IIMLIJED: IIARI< .tlllER LOCATION COllCJENT fflllE ff t()T IN INV FILE f ff t()T IN INV FILE t SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEM

• *
• IUIAN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPflCY REPORT SURRY ~m, CODE B 02/28/86 ASScSSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28A13124 DIil Ptl> & PROCESS VENT ISO. VLY ams It<<:CIMNIENTLY LOCATED ERROR: DELAY.OR ERROR IN l))ERATOR RESPOEES HI PIQLEJII DESCRIPTIC..:

II -7 PROCESS YEHT ISO & CNlff YAC Pflll) ISO Yl.Y PIIIP ccrmn.s ARE BOCHBOARD TRIP Yl.Y COHTAO LS YERTICll. ~RD 8718 PARAGRAPH NJll!ER: s.e.2.1.A

6. a.2.1. e s.e. 2.1.c QJ66ESTED

~IT: RELOCATE AS REQUIRED Hf DISPOSITI~: t<<l A:TI~ -WS CORRECTLY LOCATED W/ 6ASEOOS RELEASE CTll.S. PUMP CONTRfi.S BRWPE D W/ COO PRESSURE ~TRll.S, TRIP VALVES LOCATED WITH GASEOUS RELEASE ~TRCN..S

• DATA cw.£CTI~ DESCRIPTI~ CODE tOIB*R: TP-9, 2 VERIFICATI~

AND IJALIDATIOO TP-1,2 ANTHR(J)()IIETRICS SURVEY R0M<S: FCY-&W-111 FCY-eW-161 FC\' 6W 261 PI-19-13/14 SYSIDI QA8057 PROCESS CONTRCllER SAS WASTE AADI!W:TIYE SYSIDI SMl58 DISCRETE AOTARV SAS WASTE RADIIR:TIYE SYSTEJII SAAl59 DISCRETE ROTARY SAS ~TE AADI!W:TIYE SYSTEJII SI.IBSYSTEJII 11/11/85

• *
• TITLE tUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREAA'CY REPORT SURRY UNIT& CODE C 28Al3l25 FIRE PROTECTILW PANEL ~TRCl.S lr<<nfJENIENTLY LOCATED IUWW ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN CPERATOR IIESPIJEES tH PRIB.9I DESCRIPTI0.1 FIRE PROTECTION PAl£L COOR(LS POORLY ARRANGED 8711~MNER:

6.8.2.1.A 6.8.2.1.B 6.8.2.1,C Sl&STED ~IT: REARRANGE tH DISPOSITION: 82/28/86 A$ESSIENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE III-8 12/19/85 PLANT PROCESS COJIIJTER Will PROVIDE IIIIIIC CF FIRE PROTECTION AREAS. REFER TO PI-184-7 (28111283)

• . DATA au.ECTia.

DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIIIBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATla. AND WUDATILW TP-1.2 ~RICS SURVEY REJAl(S: PI-19-12 ITEMS INIJ(l.'JED: ~I< IOIBER LOCATION COJIIPOt£NT tM FIRE PROT H NJT IN INIJ FILE 1 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM l

• *
• tUIAN EN6INEER1IE DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNIT8 CODE B 02/28/86 ASS£SSIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A3838 INADEMTE ~TR<l. CAPABILITY.

KMAN ERROR: FAILURE TO CORRECTLY CONTROL COMPOt£NT/PARAPIETER. fff DESCRIPTION: CONTROLLERS ARE DIFFICIA.T TO CPERATE DUE TO ~RELIABLE ('Tcu:HY"> REWEE. 0700 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6. 9. 3. 2. A SOOGESTED BAC!<FIT: ENSirEERINS STUDY TO DETERIIIINE CAUSE: OF PROEI.EJII -CORRECT, AS APPRCPRIATE. DISPOSITION: THIS VALVE IS DESI6NED FOR PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ADJUSTMENT. SBL FU:.. IS ADJUST ED BY INDIVIDUAL NEEDLE VILVES, NOT BY HCV-1186

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~

CODE NI.JflBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION R91ARKS: E-36. IOP COMIENT DURING SURVEY.> (ADD, 0700 SUIDE -6932C> ITEJ!IS INVCl. VED: ~RK M.JMBER LOCATION COPIPON£NT l't'.llE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 1£V-1186 H t()T IN INV FILE f 81/38/86

• *
• HED NO TITLE HUIIW EN:iINEERINS DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT@ CODE B 2'A83131 OWIGINS l<<lVS AND VLV CCfflROLS NOT co-LOCATED 11M ERROR: DEUlY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESP(JEES , j Hf PROBLa. DESCRIPTION:

02/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II~ 91/07/85 CHARGING PUPIP *IIIOV CONTROLS LOCATED ON VERTICAL PArEL AND SI.JCT/DISCH VI..V CONTR1l.S ARE~ B* l'CHBOORD 8700 PARAGRAPH ltlll!B£R:

• 6.8.2.1.A 6.8.2.1,B 6.8.2.1.C SU66ESTED BACKFIT: CO-LOCATE 1-1-1 DISPOSITION:

REARRANGE RECIRC TO BB VLV CNTLS

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE tf.NlER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1,2 ANTHROPOETRICS SURVEY REMARKS: PI-19-6 ITEMS INVCl. VED: JIIARK t(JMBER CH6 pp St.CT JIIOV-2267A fm'-22678 i'IOV-2269A fOV-22699 JIIOV-2270A IOV-2278B Jl!OV-2275A fOV-22758 MOV-2275C ,OV-2286A LOCATION COPIPOfENT NAIi£ ff t{JT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r()T IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff t{JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff t{JT IN INV FILE f H r()T IN INV FILE I ff r()T IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 H NOT IN INV FILE .f SYSTa. SUBSYSTa.

• *
• HED t<<h 20A83031 ITEMS INVOLV£rJ: ENSIPHRI~

DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT0 IIIARK tf.J!IIBER LOCATION al!PONENT .1'9£ SYSTEJII "1V-2286B IIIOV-2286C lllV-2287A lm-2287f. ,ov-22a7i: ff t<<JT IN INV FIL£ t ff t<<:IT IN IN\I FIL£ 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t H t()T IN INV FIL£ 1 H r<<JT IN INY FIL£ t 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• HED NO lf..R ENSINEERihS DlSCREPArCY REPORT SURRY ~IT8 CODEC TITLE 28A83832 L/0 ti> SEil. OIL B/U & DC EIER OIL PIil CNTLS ~S ClJHJFR-OJ-NEN 11M ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPCNlES fff PROaal DESCRIPTION:

Ql2/28/86 ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG III-9 81/87/85 LIO Ill SEil. OIL B/U AND OC EIER OIL Pl'Jl AND 68£RATOR AIR SIDE OIL 8ACK1J) PUfllP (ESP> CONTR Cl.SNOT ARRANGED TO (J)ERATOR EXPECTATIONS UN PARASRAPH M.JtmER: 6,4,l,l,C.2 6.4.2,2.C.l 6.4.2,2.C.3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RE-'ARRAr<< TO OPERATOR EXPECTATI~ DISPOSITION: PERFORM STUDY TO DETERMINE FEASIBILITY OF TH.Jf!BSWITCHES

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NU!UlER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY R84ARKS: JUSTIFY IF NOT CORRECTED (P/0 PI-62) IIDIS INV{l. 'vE>: ll!ARK NUMBER LOCATION ~T OC EN OIL PM ESP 1:.0 Ii> SEll. 0 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

• HED NO TITLE lllfilAN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 0 CODE A 03/17/86 ASSESSPIENi LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A3e33 EIIERSENCY DIESEL ~S 1 AND 3 ARRAtEED DIFFERENTLY FROM 1 AND 2, ENS II -5 83/17/86 ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSES fff PRO&.EIII DESCRIPTION:

91ER6ENCYDIESEL PANELS 1 AND 3 ARRArGD DIFFERENTLY 1!700 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER:

6. 4. l, l, c. 2 6.4.2,2.C.l

£,, 4. 2, 2. c. 3 Sl.66ESTED 8'0(FIT: RE-ARRANGE TO A CONSISTli'-lT PATIERN ACROSS PANELS .fff DISPOSITION: RE-ARRAM3E ON CR PAN£LS AND LOCAL PANELS ALSO. COORDINATE WITH DS-29-HlC2) (20A0 1316).

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIBER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS:

PI-62 IT91S INVOLVED: MRK NLJll!BER ED6 IJHA EDS PN1.. 1 ED6 PNL 3 LOCATION COIIIPONENT '"'E ff r<<JT .IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEJ!I SUBSVST£111

• *
• HED NO \TITLE lt..R EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNITi CODE B 28Al3l39 mmo.s IIAY BE OCCIDENTIU V ~TIVATED BECAUSE CF POSITI<l4 (14 CB, IUIAN ERRORz OCCIDENTl4..

~TIVATI!lt. fff PROll.EJI DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE I -4 11/11/85 Cl)fTRO.S AR£ LOCATED lfiERE POSSI.BU &a:IDENTl4.. 14:TIVATI<14 IIAY OCCUR. 07i8 PARAGRAPH NJ!IER: 6.4.1,2.6 SU66ESTED BACl(FIT: INSTl4..L 6UARDS <14 LISTED SWITD£S. fff DISPOSITION: 61.JARD WITH CLEAR FLIP-UP SWITCH CCMRS

• DATA CCl.l.ECTION DE~IPTI<l4 AND CODE NJ!IER: TP-4, 1 CONTRll.S SURVEY REMA~S: PI-56-2 IIDIS INYOL VED: IIIARK rtJIIIBER LOCATION COf!POf£NT ,OV-cw-ZNA IIIOV-cw-2888 f()V-cw-219; .ll!ClV-tW-289D l()V-cw-286A

.111Y-CW-2168 . l()HW-296C l<<IV-Ot-286D ff ~TIN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff ~TIN IrN FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t ff ~TIN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INY FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM /

• *
• It.A. EN6I1£ERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT& CODE B 82/28/86 ASSES9£NT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 11M ERROR: , FAILURE TO CORRECTLY COHTRB. IDIPARTIENT/PAJMTER.

lff PROl!l.BI DESCRIPTION: DISPLAY~~ FOR coon PIANIP!l.ATION IS NJT IflEDIATE OR ~RENT. uee PARAGRAPH UBER: 6. 9. 3.2.D SOOSESTED BACKFIT: EN6Ir£ERJrE STUDY TO DETERMINE SOURCE OF PRDBWI -CORRECT AS APPRCPRIATE. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO Pl-19 (20A03804) I-2 ENS. PROVIDE ~TO BYPASS SYSTat. DATA ctl.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OfER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION REMARKS: E-37. (HED WRITTEN ON OPERATOR COfllllENT DURING SURVEY.) ITE"5 INVCI. ~: 1¥'.!RK ttJIIIIER LOCATION CQIIIPOENT rM A/FCV-1478 B/FCV-1488 C/FCV-1498 FEED REG WS ff NJT IN INV FILE f HNOT IN INV FIL£ f ff NJT IN INY FIL£ f HNOT IN INV FIL£* SYSTEJII I -2 96/97/85 SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• 1t,g 9EINEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNITB CODE C HED NJ TITLE 20Al3843 ~TR .11.S INTERLOCK LN*CESSARILY.

11.M ;RROR: ;. IY CAUSE IHECESSARY ll£UlYS IN IJIERAT.IlR RESPG4SE. fff PRf'a.91 DESCRIPTICl4: CCWTRO.S 14WE LN£CESSARY INTERLOCl<IrE ~IS"5. 0700 PARAGRl¥>H NlJIBER: 6. 4. 1. 2. D. 1 6. 4. 1. 2. D. 2 SU36ESTED BOCKF IT: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE III-9 87/11/85 DETERMitE NECESSITY FOR INTERLOCKIMJ IE~ISIIIS. RBIIVE WHERE APPROPRIATE. fff D: 3POSITION: E~TE WITH 9EINEERIM3 STUDY IWD AElllVE IF APPROPRIATE. DATA CCll.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-4, 1 CONTROLS SURVEY R84ARKS: PI-58-3 IIDS INWI.VED: MRK NUIIBER LOCATION CCMPCJ8T rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RCS L[j(p SVS H 1'4lT IN INV FILE 1

• *
• 11.JMN EN6INE£RIIE DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT!! CODE C HED f() TITLE 2AJi44 OBSI.ETE ~RCl.S NOT RBIOYED FRO! W4TRCl. BOARDS. tUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CONTRCl. OCTIIJi. ... PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:

OBSQ.£TE CONTRO.S REJl'.lIN COHTROL BOORDS, 071!0 PARAGRAPH NtJUIER: 6.4.1, 1.B, 1 SWGESTED BACKFIT: REflOVE UMJSED CONTROLS. ... DISPOSITION: RELOCATE BACK BEHIND MAIN BOARDS

• DATA CCLLECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE OBER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATI!l1.AND VALIDATII)( REMARKS: PI-69 ITEIIIS INW.i.e>: -IIIRK MJIIIBER LOCATION COIIPQIENT NAI£ NIC-45A NIC-4SB NIS REC ASZ ff f()T IN INV FILE t ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE t SYSIDI 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT UlST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 III-9 86/1!6/85 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• IOIAN Eh9INEEIUN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNITI CODEC TITLE 11.M ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CONTRO.. ~TION ffl PROFlBI DESCRIPTION:

OBSO..ETE CONTROLS ~IN ON CONTRll. BOARDS. 1790 PARA6RAPH NUIBER: 6.4.1.1. B. l st.66ESTED BACKFIT: REPOVE UNUSED CONTROLS ffl DISPOSITION: RBOVE, COORDINATE WITH PI-107 (20881113)

• DATA C(LLECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-4. 1 CCWT!nS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATICW REJIIARl<S: PI-68-3 IIDIS INVn.. "9: MRI< NUMBER LOCATION fDIIPIJENT rM: 5 KV RX IGlE ~RTAP CTR CHL WTR CIRC DI. WTR CN CLEAN SYS CN ST TK L\,\. LIQ WST SYS LW EVAP SYS KlDE FRQ CTR NIS 8CH SW PT LENS CRDPI ff r(JT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<lT IN IN\I FILE t ff r(JT IN IN\I FIL£ 1 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff NJT IN INV FIL£ 1 . ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff r(JT IN INV FILE t ff t<<:IT IN INV FILE t ff r(JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t H r(JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEJII 12/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 00 III-9 11/11/85 SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• HED NJ: 2A38'+5 ITE!IIS INYCl.YED:

ltJIIIAN BEINEERIIE DISCREPAP<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI MAK M.IMBER LOCATION CCMPOENT ,-SYSTEJ!I RX BAN< ll1llE STM OU CID H MJT IN INV FIL£ 1 HNOT IN INV FILE* Vfc./28/86 SUBSYSTEfll

• ltJIIIAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UN IT 0 CODE C 83/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE --________________ , 20A03049 CCtlTRQ. IIOValENT DOES NOT CONFORM TO PCPULATION STEREOTYPES. ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE.

fff PRCIBl.9! DESCRIPTION: ENS ~. START, RUN, OR OPEN IS NOT UP, RI&iT, FORWARD, CLOCKWISE OR PULL. 8700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.4.2. l SL66ESTED BACKFIT: RE-ORIENT CONTROL TO CONFOR,i TO POPI.UlTION STER£0TYPE. DISPOSITION: II -7 03/17/86

• TACTICALLY DR.6E CONTROLLERS AND LABEL TO SHOW WHICH IS D8'.AND INCREASE (I.E., 100% DE*IND OPEN). NOTE: COORDINATE CHANGES TO CONTROLLERS BORON RECOVERY PANEL WITH PI-19-4 (2e.J13020l.

DATA CO..U:CTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-4. l ~TROLS SURVEY , REAARKS: c-12 I~ INVCX..VED: LOCATION COPlPONENT FC-1113A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FCV-1122 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FCV-2122 RAA914 PROCESS CONTROLLER FCV-BR-1e2A RAA071 PROCESS CONTRCUER FCV-BR-1828 RAA075 PROCESS CONTROLLER FCV-i:iW-100 QAA057 PROCESS CONTRCUER FCV-LW-185 aAA0S4 PROCESS CONTROLLER IOJ-1186 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ICV-1758 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 LC-BR-107A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 LC-BR-UJ7B ff NOT IN INV FILE t PC-BR-109A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PC-BR-109B ff rm IN INV FILE f c-1145 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 V-LW-111 QAA052 PROCESS CONTROLLER TC-BR-128 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM CHEMICAL AND VOLUME CONTROL SYSTEM BORON RECOVERY SYSTEI'! BORON RECOVERY SYSTEl'l SAS WASTE RADIOOCTIVE SYSTEA LIQUID WASTE SYSTEM LIQUID WASTE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CHARGING SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEJ!l FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEN FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD

• *
• HED f(h 21A03e49 ITOO INVO..VED:

TCV-BR-l 11A TCV-BR-lllB llJJIAN EN61NE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 83/17/86 SURRY ~IT 8 LOCATION CQIIIPONENT NAfi!E svsm, SUBSYSTEfll RAA072 PROCESS CONTROLLER BO~ RECOVERY SYSTEIII ff NOT IN INV FILE 1

• *
• HUfllAN ENiINEERltE DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE B e2/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28AIJ851 C(){TRCLS MAY BE ACCIDENTIUY

~TIVATED BECll.lSE IF POSITIIJ4 ON CB IUAI ERROR: ACCIDENTll. ACTIVATI~ / Hf PROIUJII DESCRIPTIIII:

• COHTlnS ARE LOCATED HRE POSSIB'-E iuIDENTll.

i:tTIVATION MAY OCCUR. 0718 ~RAPH UBER: 6.4.1.2.6 Sl..66ESTED BACKFIT: INST'l.L GUARDS ON LISTED SWITCt£S. Hf DISPOSITION: SUARD WITH CLEAR PLASTIC FLIP-UP COVERS

• DATA C(llECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUUER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS:

PI-56-3 IIDIS INVll.VED: MRI< tUIBER LOCATIIII CQlll)l)£NT NAIE SYSTEM TV-f!S-101A TV-flS-lllB TV-flS-101C TV-flS-281A TV-fl!S-Z01 B TV-fllS-281C H NJT IN INV FIL£ t ff r<<lT IN INV FILE f H NJT IN INV FIL£ t DAA211 DISCRETE ROTARY IIIAIN STEAM SYSTEJII .DAB219 DISCRETE ROTARY IIIAIN STEAi! SYSTEM DAA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAM SYST81 ENS II -6 11/11/85 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• IUIAN EN6IN*ERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY IJNITI CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSf£NT LAST REVIEW HED t<>IND IP MO SOC ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff t<<IT IN INV FIL£ t ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ t SYSTEM II -7 97/11/85 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• IUIAH ENSINEERHE DISCREP1¥£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT@ CODEC 02/28/86 ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW HED r<<> TITLE RESP(JE!IBILITV STATUS DATE. 28A83855 INAIEQIJlTE

~TRll. CAPABILITY. K.R ERROR: FAIWRE TO CORRECTLY COHTRCL [Dll()ENT /~R. "" PRO!l.EM DESCRIPTION: COHTRru.fRS ARE DIFFia.l.T TO CPEAATE DUE TO ~RELIABLE C 1 Tru:HY 1) RESPClEE. UN PA~RAPH NlMBER: 6.9.3.2.A SW6ESTED BACKFIT: EN6Ir£ERIM3 STUDY TO DETERIIIINE CAUSE IF PROBLEM -CORRECT, AS 1¥>PR(J)AIATE. -1H DISPOSITION: CONTRCl. A VERY L.111 FREIJJEtO IF USE. r<<l ~TI~ NEEDED. <LCO> FILL HDR FLCII) DATA CCllECTICIN DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.l&R1 TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION RBWIRKS: E-36. (IJl COIIENT DURirE StJRYEY, > (ADD. UN GUIDE -6932C) IIDIS INVCl. W>: IIARK tu!BEA LOCATION COIIPOENT NAIi£ SYSTEM FCY-1161 ff NlT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM III-9 16/17/85 H..1MN ENSINEERINS DISCRmWCY REPORT 83/17/86

• SURRY. I.NIT 8 CODE C ASSESSP!ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29A03056 INADEOO'.ITE coma ~ILITY. ERROR: FAILURE TO CORRECTLY CONTROL CQll'.>ONENT

/PARAflETER, fff PRCIBlEJII DESCRIPTION: fff . CCWTROLLERS ARE DIFFICIA.T TO IPERATE DUE TO LNRELIABLE (*TIX£HY*> REsmeE. 9700 PARAGRAPH l'UIBER: 6.9.3.2,A SU66ESTED m<FIT: EHSINEERIIE STUDY TO DETERJIIINE CAUSE OF PROBWI -CORRECT, AS APPROPRIATE. DISPOSITION: II -7

• PROVIDE t£V TO REIIIOTELY CONTROL BYPASS VALVE FRQ!n CONTROL ROOJII. CCHS FL(}j CONTRO L) DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE r<<JMBER: TP-9. 2 YERIFICATI0'-4 AND VALIDATlllJ RE~RKS: E-36-3 (OP C()ll.llENT DURIIE SURVEY.) (ADD, 11710 GUIDE -6932Cl ITOO I NVOI.. YED: MRK IO!BcR 1-Df-385 2-0h305 FCV-1122
• LOCATION COP!PONENT AE ff t(JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FIL£ 1 ff t(JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEl'l SUBSYSTEII!
• *
• ttJMAN EN6INEEAIN6 DISC:~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT9 COIE 8 82/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A3857 INAIIE~TE

~TRCl. ~ILITY. tUIAN ERROR: FAIWRE TO CORRECTLY COHTRCl. COllClM:NT/PARAIETER. Hf PROaal DESCRIPTION: Hf COHTRO..t..ERS ARE DIFFICl.1.T TO CPERATE DUE TO ~RELIAa.£ ("Tcu:HY"> RESP(M£. 11700 PARP.SRAPH NJIBER: 6. 9. ?. 2.. A SOOGES",'ED BOCKFIT: eSIIE£RIN6 STUDY TO DETERIIIINE CAUSE IF PROa.81 -CORRECT, AS APPROPRIATE. DIS~ITION: Ir<<:REASE PERIODIC AND PREVENTIVE MINTEtfKE. (Bl(IIIKMN VALVE CONTROLS> AS APPi.I CAflE

• DATA COUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIIB£R:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND \qIDATION REMRKS: E:-36. (I)) COfiallENT DUAIN6 SURVEY.> (ADD. 87N GUIDE -6932C) ITBIS ItMl. VED: NARK IUIBEA LOCATION IDIPONENT tM sysru HIC-.31>-leeA HIC*BD-lNB HIC-BIHM: PCV-BD-100A PCV-BD-lE PCV-BD-lNC ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 HNOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 -HNOT IN INY FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SUBSYSTa! / II -7 81/38/86 (

• *
• ltJIIIAN ENGINEERING DISC~Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNITII CODE lESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2IAl3858 STEAM lllN> camn.s Ir<<:OMNIENTL y LOCATED. CDRT 91/97/85 KJIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RE~ Hf PROIUN IIESCRIPTICW:

STEAfl JIUtl) CONTROLS TOO FAR ~y FIDI IIIAIN liORK AREA. 9708 PARA61WlH ruBER: 6.8.2.1,A . 6.8.2.1,B 6.8.2.1,C S006ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE TO BErOIBOORD. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-ccx.ocATED WITH t£EDED DISP'LAYS. "1T A PROBL91. t()ACTION r£EDED, DATA cw.ECTICW DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJIBER: TP-9~2 VERIFICATI!lf AND Wl.IDATION TP-1,2 ANTHRCJllJETRICS SURVEY ~RKS: PI-19-21 IT91S INVCl. VED: NARK rt.lMBER LOCATION CQIIP()ENT ,-SYSTEM STN Ill.DP CTR H "1T IN IW FILE t SUBSYSTEM

• *
• tO!AN EM3IHEERI"6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNITi CO.DE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al38S9 CTRLS-~T flJST BE OPERATED SI!U.TArEWSLY LOCATED TOO CLOSE TOOET ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESP!N£. 1 Hf PROlUJI DESCRIPTI~:

CTRSL LOCATED TOO CLOSE T06ETl£R AHO CPS GET IN EACH OTl£RS ~Y. 0781 ~RAPH N!MBER: 6.8.3.1.B rul6ESTED BACKFIT: EN6 I -2 INVESTIGATE FEASIBILITY Of RELOCATING CONTROLS TO CPS lllRE FREEDIJI OF IIJVEIENT WHILE ~TROU.IN6 PARAIETER Hf DISPOSITI~: REFER TO PI-19 (~l RESOWTIOH IS TO~ IPERATI~ A M-fllAN TASK. DATA co..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-4. 1 ~TR!l.S SURVEY R91ARKS: PI-57. I IDIS INVll. YEO: ~IIK NJMBER LOCATION CO!flONEHT NAflE SYSIDI SUBSYST01 FW RES W H "1T IN INV FILE t U/11/85

• *
• TITLE ttJ1IAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAFCY REPORT SURRY UNIT!! CODE 28Al3868 RESISTIKE IS TOO LOW ON cnmns. KM ERROR: ~Y/ERROR IN IP RESPONSE.

Hf PROll.91 IESCRIPTION: 02/2B/86 ASS£S9ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE COfllt..T 17/11/85 RESISTArCE IS TOO LOW ON CONTROL iOOBS AND CPS CAJNJT TELL lf£N THEY~ OCTIVATED THal. 1710 ~RAPH NUMBER: 6. 4.1. 2. E SlmSTED BACKFIT: PERIODIC 11.AINT CHEDPROPRIATE DESISN. ... DISPOSITION: DELETE -rtJT VIEWED AS PROBI..EPIATIC BY !£DAT

• DATA CO...LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY REIi.ARKS:

PI-64 ITEJIIS INVCLVED: -II.ARK rt.OOIER LOCATION COMPOENT l'M PCS YS-58A YS-588 ff rtJT IN lffJ FILE t ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t ff rtJT IN HN FILE t SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM

• *
• tlR Eh6INEERIN6 DISCREPAtt'.:Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNITB CODE C ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A83961 INSTRUIENTATION AND EOOIPIENT IUSSit<<3 IN CR. ilM ERROR: ~Y/ERROR IN IP RESP!NiE, fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~: , NOD III-8 INSTRU!/EOOIP r£ED£D TO D*TECT ABN'.JRJfl.

~T ~ITille/BRitE PLANT TO SAFE~ MIT PRESENT IN CR. fff 1780 PA~~ N>>IB£R: 6.1,1,1,A 6.S.1,1,E,2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: DETEf!111Ir£ IF INSTRUPI/EOOIP rECESSARY FOR ABM'.lf!lllll. CONDITIONS/PLANT~ AND INST~ IN CR IF REOOIRED, DISPOSITION: n£RE ARE CROSS TIES TO OPPOSITE lt,IITS ~X FEEDWATER SYSTEM. E())S WILL BE ANf(JTA TED TO ENSURE IPERATORS ARE AWARE OF CROSS TIES, DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JlfflER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJl'.lRKS: PI-103-35 IIDIS IrMl. i.e: IIIARK tUIBER LOCATION COflPONENT SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM . STM DRY AFII> H NJT IN INV FILE* 12/14/86

• *
• ltJIA4 ENGINEERil'ti DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNIT& CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A83l62 INSTRlJENTATI~

AND EQUIMNT NISSIN6 IN CR. ENS III-7 IUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN !Jl RESPONSE. Hf

• PRIJIUIII DESCRIPTION:

IU. lNSTRlJI/EQUIP fEEDED TO DETECT ABNOR!IA.. PLANT CONDITIIJe/BRlt>il r<<IT IN CR. 8790 PA~ r<<.JMBER: 6.1.1.1.A 6.5.1.1.E.2 SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: DETERMINE IF INSTRUM/EQUIP NECESSARY FOR ABf<<l~ CONDITIONS/PLANT SHUTDOWN Pl4D INSTIU. IN CR IF REllJIRED. ... DISPOSITION: ADD CONTIIL DATA COU£CTIDN DESCRIPTION~ CODE N!JIIIB£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATION R91ARKS: PI-183-38. IT91 INV: CROSS corte:T CTRL FOR CHIT & IA SYS. ITEMS INVCl;l.e>: ~RK NJMBER LOCATION (Dll()£NT ,-SYSTEN SUBSYSTEN SEE R91ARKS FBA211 DISCRETE ROTARY MAIN STEAfl SYSTEJII ISWITION VR..VES 98/87/85

• *
• HlJIAN El'EINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNlTI COD£ C 12/28/86 ASSESSNENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A83e63 INSTRIJENTATI~

AND EOOIPIENT JIIISSINS IN CR * .._ ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESPIHiE. tff PROa9I DESCRIPTION: III-9 INSTRUM/EOOIP NEEDED TO DETECT ABMlRIA. PLANT CIN>ITIIMi/BRINS PLANT TO SAFE SHUTDOWN t<<lT PRESENT IN CR. 8780 PARAGRAPH rtJIIBER: 6.1.1.1.A 6.S.1.1.E.2 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: DETERll!l~ IF INSTRUIVEOOIP rEC£SSARY FOR ABr<<JRMll. CONDITI!Mi/lUNT SHUTDOWN AND INSTIU IN CR IF REQUIRED, 1H DISPOSITI~: ADD COCTRCl. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ NJIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ REMARKS: PI-113-37, ITEMS INVOI.. VED: NARK NJNB£R L.DCATI~ COIPOf£NT SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEPI FW RECIR WS H f()T IN INV Fllf

• 18/17/85
• *
• ltJIAH EhfiINEERIN6 DISCREPKY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT9 CODE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILiTY STATUS DATE 29AIJl69 COOIKLS ~y BE iuIDENTALLY ll:TIVATED BE~ IF POSITI~ CB. ttNlN ERROR: ll:CIDENTAL OCTIYATI~.

fff PROBlBI DESCRIPTICli: COORCLS AR£ LOCATED lffRE POSSIBLE ll:CIDENTAL OCTIYATION MY OCCUR. 0709 ~RAPH NUMBER: 6. 4.1. 2. 6 SOOGESTED BACKFIT: INSTALL GUARDS ON LISTED SWITD£S. fff DISPOSITION: . 1iJYE INUCIATOR PUSHBUTTIM TO IOTTOM. CF BEM:HBOAADS SO THEY WON' T BE CONFUSED WITH REACTOR TRIP PUSHarTTIJ4S

• DATA COLLECTIOil DESCRIPTI~ CODE NIJIIIBER:

TP-4. 1 CCWTROL.S SURVEY REMRl<S: PI-56-4 ITEJIIS INYCL\9: *IRK tOIBER LOCATIOil CDmENT NA1E SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM RX TRIP ff NJT IN IlfJ FILE* / II -6 99/19/85

• *
• lUAH EM:iINEERIN6 DISC1!£PA'C( REPORT SURRY UNITi CODE TITLE 28A83170 COORCl.S PIAY BE ACCIDENT~Y ACTIVATED BECAUSE CF POSITION ON CB, ttM ERROR: ACCIDENT~

ACTIVATION. / H+ PROaal DESCRIPTICli: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE C()l)LT 19/19/85 CONTRO-S ARE LOCATED lfiERE POSSIBLE ACCIDENT~ ACTIVATION PIAY OCCUR, 07N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.4.1,2.6 SLEGESTED BACKFIT: INST~ Sl.JARDS ON LISTED SW1TCt£S H+ DISPOSITION: DELETE -El Tl£R LOCl<S OR NO PROBWI, DATA Cll..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-4,l CONTRfl.S SURVEY ffEIIIA~S: PI-56-5 I TOO I NYCl. VED: PIARK tt.lMBER LOCATION Cl)Jl(J£NT 'NAfE CTl!T IV oc pp TV-BD-2811A TV-BD-2NB TV-BD-211C TV-BD-2ND TV-BD-2NE TV-BD-2Nf TV-CC-205A TV-CC-28511 TV-CC-205C ff NlT IN IPN FILE

• ff tm IN INV FILE* ff t()T IN IPN FILE
• ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* ff t()T IN INV FILE
• ff t<<JT IN INV FILE
• ff t<<lT IN INV FILE
• ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff f(]T IN INV FILE t ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE t SYSTEJII SUBSYSWI
• *
• l£D NJ: 28Ae3871 ITEJIIS INYCI. YED: HJIAI EN6INEERIN6 DISC1EPAf£Y REPORT SURRY UNITI JIARK l'UllER LOCATION COlfl()£NT

,-SYSTEIII TV-CC-297 ff NOT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-219A ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 TV-CC-289B ff l'(]T IN INV FILE t TV-CC-219A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-CC-218B ff l'(]T IN INV FILE t TV-CC-218C ff NOT IN INV FILE* TV-CV-2214 ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t TV-CV-25eA HNOT IN INV FILE t TV-CV-250B ff l'(]T IN INV FILE t TV-CV-2SOC ff NOT IN INV FILE t TV-CV-258D ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t TV-DA-2Ml ff NOT IN INV FILE t TV-DA-200!1 ff NlT IN INV FILE t TV-IA-211A ff NOT IN INV FILE t TV-IA-201B ff l'(JT IN INV FILE 1 TV-Lll-299A H I\OT IN INV FILE 1 TV-ut-2008 ff l'(]T IN INV FI!.£ t TV-lJl-288C ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-ut-208D ff l'(]T IN INV FILE 1 TV-Ul-28E ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-ut-20ef ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t TV-fllS-209 HNOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-fllS-211 ff l'(]T IN INV FILE 1 TV-RC-2Sl9A ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t TV-RM-2NA ff l'(]T IN INV FI!.£ 1 TV-RM-2NB ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 TV-RP!-201C ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SI-298 ff I\OT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SI-201A ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-SI-211B ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-5S-2NA ff r()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-SS-2988 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TV-5S-201A ff r()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-SS-211B ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SS-212A ff r()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-5S-2t2B ff I\OT IN INV FILE 1 TV~ ff l'(]T IN INV FILE f

• TV-SS-2838 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t TV-5S-284A ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SS-2MB ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 TV-YS-289A ff l'(]T IN INV FILE 1 TV-VS-2898 H.P(IT IN INV FILE 1 ez/28/86 SUBSYSTEJII
• *
• ltJA ENSINEERitE DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNITIJ CODE 12/28/86 ASSESSIENT

~T REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29AIJJ871 camn.s MAY BE ACCIDENT1¥.l.Y ACTIVATED BECAUSE CF POSITI~ CB. tU!AN ERROR: IUIDENT!l. ACTIVATil)I, Hf PROa.EN IESCRIPTil)I: Hf COO'RCN..S AR£ L~TED lfiERE POSSIBLE ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATil)I PIAY OCCUR. 1798 PARAGRAPH NIJIIIBER: 6.4.1,2.6 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: INSTIU GUARDS 1)1 LISTED SWITDES, DISPOSITION: OCCID£NT1l. ACTIVATION OR STIP WOULD ~VE NO SAFETY CONS£11JeaS AND LITTLE OPERA TICJA.. INJACT, CSEE WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION PAGE WITH ORISil'R HED.> DATA cou.ECTION D£SCRIPTl1)1 AND CODE M.JIIIBER: TP-\, 1 ~RCl.S SURVEY REPIARKS: PI-56-6 I T0IS I NIJCl. VED: . MARK rtllilBER LOCATil)I C(Jlll.ll(Jf8T l'flME BEAR OIL PP TURB TURN SR ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII III-9 11/11/85

• *
• IUIAN ENSINEERINS DI&:AEPArCV REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED tll TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2iA93872 mmn.s ~v BE ACCIDENT~Y ACTIVATED BECAUSE CF POSITION ON CB. KM ERROR: ACCIDENT~

ACTIVATI~ fH PROa.EII DESCRIPTION: CONTRO.S ARE LOCATED lfi£RE POSSIBLE ACCIIIEHTll. ACTIVATION ~V OCCUR. 97N PAN3RAPH NUMBER: 6.4.1,2.6 SI.GSESTED BACKFIT: INSTALL GUARDS CW LISTED SWIT0£S. fH DISPOSITION: l'OVE lP . ON PAr£L. DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-4.1 ~TRO.S SURVEY RBIARKS: PI.-56-7 ITEJIIS INWLVED 1 IIARK NUIIBER LOCATION COllflONENT NAIE SYSIDI H NlT IN INV FILE* EN6 1-BC-P-lB 2-BC-P-lB AAB113 METER BEARING COOI.IN6 0-RADIIR:TIVE SYST91 II -7 11/11/85 SUBSYSTEII

• *
• IUIAN EN;INEERIN6 DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE ) ~/28/86 ASSESSIENT
• LAST REVIEW HED Ml TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28Al3873 IIMRll.S IIAV BE ACCIDENTIUV

~TIYATED BE~ CF POSITION ON CB. tlR ERROR: ACCIDENTR.. ~TIYATION. fff PROIUN DESCRIPTION: CONTROLS ARE LOCATED WHERE POSSIBLE ACCIDENTR.. ~TIYATION IIAY OCCUR. ~'711 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6. ~.1. 2. 6 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: INSTALL WARDS ON LISTED SWITC1£S. fff DISPOSITION: ENS CHAN6E TO A DIFFERENT TYPE CF fflNDLE TO PREVENT ACCIDENTR.. ACTIVATION. . DATA cw.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-4. 1 CONTRCU SURVEY REIIARKS: PI-fxi-8 I TEJ11S INYll. YEO 1 IIAIIK MJIIIBER LOCATION CDIPOJENT NAflE SYSTEM INSD RS PPS H hOT IN INV FILE

• II -6 11/11/85 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• lt.JIAf EhSINEERIIE DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNITI CODEC 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE 28AIJ281 CNTRL. SWITC>IES TOO SfR.L FOR TORQI.£ REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE Tt£111. ttM ERROR: DELAYS OR ERRORS IN CPERATOR RESPCftSES Hi PROll9I DESCRIPTION:

TAG III-9 CONTRCl. SWITD£S ARE TOO 14\RD TD GET OUT OF Pill-TD-LOCK POSITION AHD NUST FORCE TH0I OUT CF POSITION. 8710 PARAGRAPH NJIIIER: 6.4.4.2.B SU66£STED BACKFIT: ADJUST J-lfNlt.£ CONTROL SiifITCHES FDR EASE OF REPOSITIONING UIIEETIN6 1710 TORQI£ 6UIDELH£S >. REPLACE IF NECESS. 1H DISPOSITION: TRAININS PROB., !PS t()T CPERATINS CONTRW, PROJERLY

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-4. 1 crwmns SURVEY REIWl<S: PI-65. NEED INDIYl!MJl.

PRIORITIZATIONS FOR TRG FIX. IIDIS UMl.YED: ~Ill< NJIIIER LOCATION CCJ,IIP(]t£NT tM: 1> NEED LIST 2) CF~ PU J> LL-TO-LCX:

4) K CNTLS J-19illES H t()T IN IrN FILE t HNOT IN IrN FILE 1 H f()T IN INV FILE t HNOT IN IrN FILE t H t()T IN IrN FILE t SYST01 SUBSYST01

/ 12/15/85

• *
• l<<.JMN EN3INEERIN6 DISC:REPAM:Y REPORT SURRY UNITi CODEC 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<:J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Ai32l4 A FEW ROTARY SELECTOR ~TRa..S l4lVE r<<:J POINTER INDICATION.

tUIAN ERROR: ~Ihfi CONTROL IN WRW3 POSITION OR !!lfSINTERPRETATl()I CF P RESENT ~TRn. POSITION.

• Hf PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION:

fff POINTER INDir.ATIONS ARE HIDDEN BY ORAP&:/PURPLE TAPE. 0700 PARASRAPH OBER: 6, 4. 4. S. D. 1 SOOGESTED BACKFIT: RE'10VE TAPE AS r£CESSARY TO EXPOSE SWITCH KNOB POINTERS. DISPOSITION: . III-8 FIX AS PER lro<FIT. COLOR CODE LABELS WITH AN OAA'<6E OR PURPLE DOT. COORDIN ATE WITH LABELlrE STUDY PI-82 (28Alllil), DATA m.LECTION DESC:RIPTIIJ4 AND CODE NUfUIER: 'TP-\,1 CONTROLS SURVEY REMRl<S: DS-21, !DISCRETE THlJIIB ROTARY CONTROLS ()I t<<JT SHTDWN PNLS. l ITEMS INW.~: flARI< MJIIIB£R LOCATI()I lnflONENT rflfllE 2-Dt-P-2C 2-cH-P-21) IIOY-FW-251B Jl()V-FW-251D IIOY-FW-251F F~ DISCRETE ROTARY FAB29J* DISCRETE ROTARY DAA216 DISCRETE ROTARY DAB21S DISCRETE ROTARY DAA21S DISCRETE ROTARY SYSTEM Delle&¥.. lNl YOJJIE CONTR!l. SYSIDI Cl£JIIICR.. AND W.IJE comn. SYSIDI FEEDWATER SYSTEM FEEDWATER SYSIDI FEEDWATER SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM BORATION BORATION lSCl.ATION YALVES ISOLATION VALVES Iso..ATION YALVES il/38/86

• *
• fUIAN ENSitEERit.6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT@ CODE 12/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPCleIBILITY STATUS DATE 28A032t5 IODTARV com~T ROT SEL CTRLS lfJT LS EtOJ6H TO Ill.I) EASILY tt.lMN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CJl RESPlJISE.

Hf PROa.al ~SCRIPTION: fff CONTRCl. IOOBS ARE r<<JT LARGE OO&i TO t()U) EASILY AND wrnwT FATIGUE. 07M PARAGRAPH NU!BER: 6. 4. 4, 5, F Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: KNOBS WITH LARGER, EASIER TO IIIAtfl6E KNOBS. DISPOSITION: llJllt..T DELETE-AS SFTY FEATUR£, AFW CTRL IIIOVS DESISNED TO R91AI"1P*N 45 SECS ON AUTO. IN RARE CASES, OPS TO I~> DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: l'P-\,1 ~TRaS SURVEY REJl'.lRKS: C-16, DISP:OVERRIDE FEATURE, r<<JT DESIRABLE TO OVERRIDE EASY ITEMS INV(l. lJEih -lllRK IUIBER LOCATION COIPC>>ENT PAE SYSTEM IIJY-FW-151A lllV-FW-151B IOY-FW-151C IIIOY-FW-151D IOY-FW-151E l<<l\l-AH51F IIJY-fll-251A ,r(JV-FW-251B IIJY-FW-251C l<<l\l-FW-251D IOY-FW-251E ff r<<JT IN IPN FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN UN FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN IPN FILE 1 H r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 CM216 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM DAA216 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEJII CAB215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM DAB215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM CM215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ISCLATION Wl.VES ISOLATICW IJALVES ISCUTION Wl.VES ISOLATICW VALVES ISOLATION WLVES 87/11/85 EN6INEERIN6 DISCRmKY REPORT

• SURRY UNITI l£D NO: 28Al32e5 ITEJIIS INVILVED:

~AK ltJIIBER LOCATI~ CDIPOfENT SYSTEM DAA215 DISCRETE ROTARY F~TER SYSTEM *

• 12/28/86 SUBSYSTEJII Iso..ATI~

Wl.VES

• *
• HED r<<l HI.MAN EN6It£ERI,., DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT SURRY ~IT& CODE B TITLE 2tAa32t9 awl'AifflENT RECIRC FANS LOOICR. ARRANIEENT AND LAYOOT, >IR ERROR: lP£RATION OF WRONS CQll)(J£NT, fff PROa.91 ~IPTI!t4:

92/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -6 87/11/85 ~T RECIRC FANS ARIAEED LFT TD RT: 1B, 1C 1 1A. COfQENTS Sltl.lD BE ARRANGED RT TD LFT. IN~ OR NJIER SEQ 0710 PARASRAPH rt1"8ER: 6.8.2,2,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: ARRANz COfflONENTS FR(>>! L£FT TD RISHT IN ~IC OR roERIC SE1!.£f£E. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO.PI-117-3 (28883816), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP.:9,2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.IDATION TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY REMRKS: VC-356. (co,ipQf£NTS AR£ ON ~IT VENTILATION PAIEL..> ITEMS INVCl. VED: MRK tu!BER LOCATION WIPflENT tfVE SYSTEIII 1-VS-f-1A 1-W-f-18 1-VS-f-lC 2-VS-f-lA 2-VS-f-lB 2-VS-f-lC ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f ff r<<lT IN INV FILE* ff r<<JT IN INV FILE* -NAAl46 DISCRETE ROTARY VEMTILATI~ SYSTEII rt¥184S DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEIII NAB84S DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATION SYSTEII SUBSYSTEIII

• *
• tOIAH ErfiINEERING DISCREPAl<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW HED l<<l TITLE RESPCWeIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A83482 P() FEEDBACK THAT PUSHllITTON

~TRll.S BEEN OCTIVATED, tU9I ERROR: IIIY CAUSE DELAYS/ERRORS IN CPERATOR RE~ lff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: ENG IPERATORS r<<J FEEDBACK THAT PUSHBUTTON CONTROLS~ BEEN OCTIVATED. 0708 PARA61"'H NlJq!ER: 6. 4. 3.1. B SOOSESTED BACKFIT: II -6 ADJUST TO SHtlil RESISTIW:E lffN D£PRESSIN6 PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC IIIAINTENAfCE ON ALL CONTl!ll.S lff DISPOSITIONz DELETE -ADDITION IF RED/BREEN LISHTS PROVIDES r£ED*D FEEDBACK 1S£E PI-77-4 (28A 02151), DATA COLl.£CTlll4 DESCRIPTION ANO CODE NIJIIIBER: TP-4, l alflRCl.S SURVEY REll!RKS: PI-67-1. ITEfll INV: INTRLK FOR R/S TO START S6 FW PP & FW BYP IIDIS IN\l(l.lJED: IIRRK rtJIIIBER LOCATION co,JlONENT ,-FW BYP S6 TO FW PP ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 H MJT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM 11/11/85

• *
• tt.WlN EIEINEERHE DISCREPAf(;Y REPORT . SURRY lJNITi CODE A W2BIB6 ASSESSflENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2A3485 fll ~T PUSHalTTCJ4 CCJ4TRO..S

.14WE BEEN ACTIVATED. 1tMAN ERROR: IIAY CAUSE DELAYS/ERRORS IN CP RE!lm4SE. Hf PROB..91 DESCRIPTION: EN6 IP£RATORS NO FEEDBACK THAT PUSHllJTTCJ4 CONTROLS HAVE BEEN ACTIVATED, 1700 PARAGRAPH NlJIBER: 6.4.3, 1.B SU36ESTED BACKFIT: II -5 ADJUST TO SHOW RESISTAra lf£N DEPRESSING PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC IIAINTENAra ON ALL CONTROLS Hf DISPOSITION: ADD 2 METERS, WR/NR, WR TO COVER IIAXIIIJIII PIPE ~ITV. SEE PI-71-11 (21Ai2214)

• DATA ctLLECTICJ4 DESCRIPTICJ4 AND CODE tUIER: TP-4.1 CONTROC.S SURV£Y AEJIIARKS:

PI-67 ITEMS INVO.VED: IIARK MJIIIBER LOCATION CQllllJ()f£NT rM DiS LlfE FLO FT-1122 FT-2122 ff NJT IN IPN FILE.t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff f(JT IN IPN FILE t SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII / 15/28/85

• *
• ltR EN3INEERIN6 DISCREPA1£Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT8 CO~ A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCIEIBILITY STATUS DATE 2eAa34l6 NO FEEDBAD< THAT PUSHBUTION comns lflVE BEEN ~TIVATED.

t1.R ERROR: IE.AV/ERROR IN CJ) RE~ I fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: !PS lflVE r<<lT FEEDBACK THAT PUSHBUTTON COHTROLS BW<<TIVATED. 0700 PARAS~ NlJ!llER:

6. 4. 3. 1. B Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: EN6 II -5 ADJUST TO 81,Qj RESISTAta WHEN DEPRESSIN6 PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC IIIAINTENArCE !ti CONTRll.S tlf DISPOSITION:

PEIIIIIISSIVE TO RESET BEEN CHANiED TO 1 ,.IN FRIii 5 ,.IN. PROVIDE M.. ~IAT ION, 1 FOR TRAIN A AND 1 FOR TRAIN B. DATA COLLECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ COD* fUIBER: TP-4. 1 CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-67 ITEMS INV(l.'a: ~RK tUIBER LOCATION C()ll')()faT rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII SI RESET HNOT IN INV FILE f 11/11/85

• KM EN61NEERl"6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY IJIIT i CODE A 83/17/86 ~NT LAST REVIEW TITLE . RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Ae3487 r<<:I FEEDBAO< THAT PUSHBUTTON C(MR!l..S BEEN ACTIVATED. ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN (J) RESPOOSE.

"* PR08l.EJil DESCRIPTION: CPERATORS HWE NO FEEDBACK THAT PUSHBUTION CONTROLS HWE BEEN ACTIVATED. 87N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.4.3.1.B Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: II -5 ADJUST TO SHOW RESISTANCE WHEN DEPRESSING PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC IIAINTENAta AU CONTROLS fff DISPOSITION: EXISTING INSTRUl8TATION CIIIASNAHELICJ PROVIDES NECESSARY FEEDBACK. CONTROL IN OU ESTION IS A no POSITION SWITCH THAT CI.ICl<S INTO POSITION. NO ACTION IS REOUIRED DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.DIBER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY ~Rt<S: PI-67 ITEMS INVOLVED: IIARK NU!IIBER LOCATION COPPONENT NAIii£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 91R AIR~ H r<<:IT IN INV FILE f 03/17/86 *

• I
• II.A 06INEERIN6 DISCREPAN::Y REPORT SURRY UNIT& CODE B HED t<<l TITLE 28A934l8 t<<) FEEDl¥D< THAT PUSHBUTION cnmn.s KlYE BEEN ACTIVATED.

ltMAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJI RESPCWSE. lff PROa.EM DESCRIPTION: 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESP!N>IBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 I -2 15/28/85

• IPERATORS l4IVE NJ FEEDBIO< THAT PIJSHllJTTCW CONTROLS BEEN ~TIVATED.

97N PARASRAPH NI.MBER: 6. 4. 3.1, B SOOSESTED BACKFIT: ADJUST TO SHQrl RESISTAra lffN DEPRESSIN6 PBS. ENSURE PERIODIC II.AINTENANC£ ON ALL CONTRCl..S Hf DISPOSITil)I: ADD BYPASS FLOW INDICATION, COORDI~TE WITH Pl-67-1 (2A3402l, DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-4, l CONTROLS SURVEY REIi.ARKS: PI-67-5 I TEJIIS INVCl. YED: ~IIK IUIBER LOCATION COflONENT NAi'IE SYSTEII S1JBSYST9I FW BYP FLIM H NJT IN IfN FILE 1

• *
• ttR ENHNEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITa CODEC ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 20A8428J UICK IF PROCEWRES.

tUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN ACCESSINS IJOClJENTS. fff PROl!l.EJII DESCRIPTION: t<<JD III-9 EA I.MIT DOESN'T~ Co,Jlt.JTER SET !F PROCEDURES AVAIL TIPEASCNEL-SOflE OPERATINS PR0C/D£C KLISTS STORED IN INEX 1780 PA~RAPH ttll!BER: 6.1.3, 1,D SU66£STED BACKFIT: PROVIDE PROCEDURES ~D CHECKLISTS IN CR. Hf DISPOSITION: PROCS REQ IMED ~T SHCllD BE STORED IN CR. OTl£RS ARE AVAIL IN A TH!ELY ll!Arff:R. EP,AP,FRP,ECA,FCA,ARP IN CR. OTHER PROCS NOT REG HIED ~TION STORED IN Atf£X

• PERIODIC CHECKLIST StWJl BE PERf'OAIED TO ENSURE PROCS APPfDJ JIIAINTAINED.

DATA CD..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE !UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIAIMS: E~35. PI-7 <20080103> TO BE IN SHULAR Jl!Aff£R. IIDIS I NVll.. i.el: ~AK tUIBER LOCATION CCJIIIJ()NENT SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IPS/D£CKLST H t()T IN INV FILE t 16/U/85

• *
• 11.JA EN6Ir£ERirt3 DISCREPAtCY REPORT 02128/86 SURRY UNITI CODE A ASSESSfiENT LAST REVIEW HED NO
• TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21883885 l'fl SILEJ<<:E Fll<<:TI~ ANN.ICIATOR RESPCNSE CWTRCl.S tUAI ERROR: PIAY C'.AUSE DELAY/ERROR IN CPERATOR RESP!lEE DUE TO HIGH LEVEL S IF l'flISE. fff PROlllEN DESCRIPTl~:

ENS II -5 ANN. CNTRLS. lfW£ t'1 S£PARATE Sil.Ba CAPABILITY, ~IN, LIGHT TO FLASH lfiIL.E l(IRN IS SI LENT, 1780 PARAGRAPH t(JIIIB£R:

• 6. 3. 4, 1, A. 1 6, 3. 4, 1, A, 2 9.J66ESTED BACKF IT:
• PROVIDE SIL.Er<<:E CAPABILITY FOR ANNKIATOR REsmEE CONTROLS.

fff DISPOSITI~: PROVIDE SIL.Er<<:E CAPABILITY AND CONSIDER SELECTED RINJ8'0< FEATURE. SEE PI-85 121 A82186)

• DATA COLLECT!~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUMa:R:

• TP-3,1 ~ICIATOR SYSIDIS REVIEW TP-1,6 Af!BIENT NOISE SURVEY REJIIARKS:

PI-37 ITEJIIS IN\JOL YED: PIARK fUIBER LOCATI~ CQIIIPOtENT ,-SYSTBI -RESP CNT H r<<JT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM 86/86/85

• *
• ltlA4 EhSINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNITI CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28Bl3el6 CRITICll.

Fl.KTIONS ~TR(LS DO NOT COYER/Bt.WlRD. ti.A ERROR: fllAY CAUSE ~IDENTAL ACTIVATI~ OF SW1TD£S/C0STLY SYSTEM/EQ UIPIENT REPAIRS. 1+1 PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: III-7 CONTROL SWITD£S ACTIVATING CRITICAL FIJCTIC*S DO r(JT *lYABLE COYER/Bt.WlRD TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATION. 8710 PARAS~ l't.JPIBER: 6.4.l.2.C.1 6.4.1.2.C.2 6.4.1.2.C.3 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: EYALlllTE FOR CRITICALITY OF FI.ICTION AND INSTAU. .oYABLE COYERS/SUARDS WHERE APPLICABLE. 1+1 DISPOSITION: REPLACE TURBINE CONTROL PUSHBUTIONS 61.JARD BY RECESSING

• DATA Ct:llECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-4. l CONTRQ.S SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-55 IIDIS INVOI. YED: fllARK ttJIIIBER UJCATI~ COIPONENT rM: RX TRIP PBS SI BLKS SI PBS TURB TRIP PB ff NlT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM / 11/12/86

• *
• HED NO EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNI11 CODE C TITLE 28Be3818 IDTID. IS DlJllICATED I.NECESSARILY~

CB. 11.R ERROR: lHECESSARY ~RDWARE ADDS TO YISIA. CL.UTTER IN CR. ItCREASES PROBABILITY [F OPERATOR ERROR. / fff PROILEJII DESCRIPTill4: 02/28/86 ~T LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS III-9 11/87/85 IPERATORS REPORT Tl4lT DUPLICATION Cf' THE CONTROL IS 1.WNEC£SARY IN CR. 8791 PARAGRAPH ~R: 6.4.1, l,B,2 SL66ESTED BACKFIT: REJIJYE DUPLICATE CONTR!l. FROII CB. f,f,4 DISPOSITION: ENGINEERING STUDY TO D£TER1i!It£ l'£Eil FOR IIUPI...ICATION. R90VE IF NOT 1'£EDED, DATA C(ll£CTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-4. 1 CONTROLS SURVEY ~tl<S: Pl-61 ITEJIIS INVO.. VED: fllARK tUIBER LOCATION CCN>IJrENT SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM CC HD TK YNT ff f<<JT IN IPN FILE t

• *
• ltMlH EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAt£Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT! CODEC ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 29813481 r<<I INTERLOCKING CAPABILITY FOR PB FOR PUTTING S6 IN IET LAVI.P, ti.JI.AN ERlftlf!:

MY C'.AUSE DELAYS/ERRORS IN OPERATOR RESPCNSE. fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: III-9 POSSIBILITY If' TRIPPING CLOSED THE MIN FE£D RES VALVES AND IIJVS WHILE DEPRESSIN6/IO.DIIE RESET PB. 8780 PARAGRAPH tOBER: 6.4.1.2.F SU66ESTED BAD<FI T: ADD MINTAINED POSITION OVERRIDE COHTROL FOR THIS FIJCTION. ENSURE AUT~TIC DISABLE llURIN 6 IU NECESSARY TI IES. lff DISPOS.ITION: SAFETY FIKTION OPERATES PER DESIGN. IT 9W.D N)T BE DEFEATED

• DATA co..LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE N.IIBER: TP-4, l CONTRCl.S SU11V£Y REMARKS: PI-59 ITEJIIS INVOLVED: -MRK M.IMBER LOCATI~ ~T tM: SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII S6 BYP PB ff NlT IN INY FILE* 11/30/86

• ttJMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT e CODE B 13/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ----------------------

---

28912385 PRZR tffR CTR!. STATUS LT INDIC !EWING INCOOISTENT W/ OTHER CTRLS. ENG II -6 llM ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

tff PROBI.DI DESCRIPTION: IN Pll.L-TO-LOCK POSTN, STATUS LTS REMAIN LIT TO INDICATEBRKR FEEDING HTR CTR!.. CIRCS IN CLO SEDOR CPEN. 8780 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.5.3.1.C 6.6.6.3 6 *. 5.1, 6. D, 1 6. 5. 1, 6. D, 3 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: CPEN BRl<ER WHEN CTR!.. IS PULL-TD-LOCK. EXTINGUISH RED & GRN STAT LTS IN P-T-L, INSTiti 3RD LT FOR BRl<R CLOSED

• 83/17/86
• tff DISPOSITION:

RECEIVE CONTROL SWITCH SO TlflT RED LISHT IS NOT DEFEATED IN Pl.ll-TD-LOCK POS!TIO N. SWITOi HANDLE TO PROVIDE TACTILE DIFFERENCE.

• DATA C<UECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJl!BER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-8.1 CDIVENTIONS SURVEY TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND IJALIDATION REIIIARl<S:

PI-7e-2. <SEE PI-7e-1 (28A02304), PI-7e-3 12eB22306)), ITENS INVCl.VED: LOCATION CD,IPONENT NAME SYSTEfl PRZR HTRS ff NOT IN INV FILE* SUBSYSTEl'I

• *
• HED NO TITLE ttR EN6INE£RIN6 DISC~ REPORT SURRY UNIT8 CODE 8 28822316 AFW PP CTRL STATUS LT INDIC IEANIN6 IrccrEISTENT W/ OTHER CTRI.S. tUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN (P RESPONSE.

fff PROBWI DESCRIPTION: 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -6 87/11/85 1t1EN IN PULL-TD-LOCK POSITION STATUS LTS R91AIN LIT TO INDICATE EOUIP IS

• IN SERVICE" <I. E * , NOT Tl&El oon. 8708 PARAGRAPH rtJNBER: 6. 5. 3. 1. C 6. 6. 6. 3 6. 5. 1. 6. D. 1 6. 5. 1. 6. D. 3 S006ESTED BACKFIT: tm< LP STAT LTS TO EXTIN6U1SH IN PULL-TD-LOCK POSTN. fff DISPOSITION:

CORRECT PER BACl<flT

• DATA COLLECT!~

DESCRIPTICl4 AND CODE ~R: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-8. 1 ~TICIE SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RBIARKSz PI:-7&-3. (SEE A.SO PI-7&-1 128A82304l, PI-78-2 120812305). ITEMS ItMl. VED: MRK rtJMBER LOCATION COflONENT rtllE SYSTEJII AFW PP H N>T IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• ttJIAI ENHNEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNITQI CODE i2/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED ti! TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28823111 ti! AtfUCIATOR RESPCNSE CCMR!l.S AT S()IE IIIAIN WAK STATill6 tUIAN ERROR: ~y IN RESP!MlE TO ANIU£IAT0RS fff PROEl.£111 DESCRIPTION:

tll ~IATOR RESPCNSE CONTROLS AT RISHT END Cf BEfCH BOARD AND AT COf!PIJTOR CONSOLE Hf 0700 PA~RAPH MJIIIBER: 6.1.1.3.C.2 Sl.66ESTED ~IT: INSTiu CONTROLS AT RISI-ff £ND Cf BENCHBOARD AND CIJIIPUTE~. DISPOSITI~: DEl.£TE -ADDITIOtA. STATI~ IS r(}T NEEDED, IT IS IIJREDESIRABLE TO KWE OPS TA KE POSITIVE OCTION

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-1.1 WRKSPACE SURVEY R91AR1<S:

PI-4 . I IDIS Il'Ml. VED: MRI< ttJIIIBER LOCATI~ (Dll)(]f£NT NAf!E SYST01 S1JBSYST0I NI RESP CTR H NJT IN INV FILE

• C1JlllLT 07/11/85
• *
• llR ENJIN£ERH6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNI11 CODE A TITLE 28823829 RESERVE STAT!~ SERVICE ~TRll. SWS IICCJNENIENTLY LOCATED. tt.NlN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

Hf PROa.EM DESCRIPTI~: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -S 01/17/85 RESERVE STA S£RV CTRL SWS BEfOIBOARD SHOJLD WARD RAILIM3. 8708 PA~RAPH ~R: 6. 8. 2. 1. A 6. 8. 2. 1, B 6. 8. 2. 1. C SLE6ESTED BACl<FIT: INSTALL 6UARD RAILING. Hf DISPOSITION: INSTALL GUARD RAILING. REFER TO PI-56 !2'A83807) DATA CCliECTILW DE5CRIPT1(l4 AND CODE MMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1.2 ~THROPOIIIETAICS SURVEY ~RKS: PI-19-20

• I TEJ11S I NVCl. VED 1 ~RK NI.Jf!BER LOCATION fDIIJ()fOT PM SYSTEM RES STA SERY H NJT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM

/

• * ** ttJlflH ENiINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT -02/28/86 SURRY UNITla CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED 00 TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS -DATE 29.113821 80m. RECOVERY P~L ~RCl.S Itm.VENIENTLY LOCATED -IUIAN ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN (J)ERATOR R£SPCMlES

' / tH PROILEJII IESCRIPTION: EN6 CONTROLS "3T ARIIANE> BY SYS, SUBSYS, FUICTION, OR 0Tt£ R LOSll:ll. RATIOfRE UN PARAGRAPH NIJIBER: 6.8.2, 1.A 6.8.2.1,B 6.8.2. l,C SOOSESTED 8'0<FIT: ISRRANSE TO LOGICAL PAITERNS/SRClJPS fff DISPOSITION: ?£RFOR,1 ARRAN6£111ENT STUDIES. COORDINATE WITH VD-19 123A01005l, PI-72-3 (~ >, PI-113 (~ll, PI-llla-3 (291182019), PI-119-4 (20001222), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION CODE !OBER: TP-9.2 1/ERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1.2 ANTHROPOIETRICSSURVEY REJIIARl<S: PI-19-4. RESPONSIBILITY: ENG/OPS/ESSEX IIDIS INVOL ~lh ~RK NJIIBER LOCATION COl'IPONENT NAfllE SYSTEM B RCVRY PNI.. H ~TIN INV FILE t SUBSYST01 II -7 lal/la7/85

• *
• r!J~ £NSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODEC 02/28/86 ASSESSIIENT LAST REVIEW l£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 2aY13121 BA RECIRCULATI~

~TRtl.S Il'CCNVENIOOLY LOCATED tUIAN ERROR: DELAY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR AESPQl&S fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: BA RECIRC CONTROLS Ct.I VERTiaL PAr£L, SHlllD BE ON BEtOiBOARD 871ie PARAGRAPH NIJl!&:R: 6.8.2.1,A 6.8.2.1.B 6.8.2.1.C Sl.66ESTED BACl{FIT: RELOCATE CONTROLS TO BENCHBOARD fff DISPOSITION: NONE DELETE -ROOT CAUSE IS SYSTEJII PROBLEfll, RE. PUMP OPERATI~, PUJ!P l'IAINTENAf£E IS B ElrE PERFORIED, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NU"8£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATION TP-1,2 ANTHROPOETRICS SURV£Y REMARKS: Pl-19-1 I TEJIIS INVCl VED: -MAK NUMBER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAIii£ SYSTEJII t£V-11M RAA326 PROCESS CONTROLLER CHEMICAL AND VOLI.JIE CONTROL SVSTEJll SUBSYSTEM III-9 11/11/85

• *
• HED .NO TITLE HUPIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 COD£ B 28Vi3822 IUlJIJLATOR TEST LINE lSCl. VILVE CONTROLS INCONVENIENTLY LOCATED IUAN ERROR: IIE1.AY OR ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPONSES fff PROIUJII DESCRIPTION:

02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG I -2 01/07/85 ~TOR TEST LINE ISOLATION VAi.VE CONTROLS LOCATED ON VERTICAL PANEL HAVE UNi."ONVENTlON IL AR~ 87N PARAGRAPH l'UBER: 6,8,2,1.A 6,8,2,1,B 6.8.2.l.C QJ66ESTED BACl<FIT: REARRINiE COOROLS '** DISPOSITI~: IIEARIREE VALVE CONTROLS DATA cn.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJll!BER: TP-9, 2 VERIFICATION VALIDATION TP-1,2 ~THR(J)QIIETRICS SURVEY IIEJIIAff(S: PI-19-19 I TalS lNYCI. \JED: NARK NJIIIBER LOCATION cmrioNENT NAfllE ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 H r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTE."I SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• HI.A EttlINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CO~ B 03/03/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITL.£ RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 28\122487 NIS AND PRZR RECORDERS Itm'NENIENTLY LOCATED tt.fMN ERROR: . DELAY OR ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSES

._. PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: II -6 PRZR AND NIS RECORDERS Ir<<:CJMNIEHTLY LOCATED (ON VERTICll. PAr£LS> DURING STARTUP 0700 PARAGRAPH NlJIBER: 6.8.2.1.A 6.8.2.1,B 6.8.2.1.C SOOSESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE ... DISPOSITION: I'() ACTIC~. EXISTING RECORDER LOCATIONS ARE ADEQUATE

• DATA cn.L.£CTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE l'l.ffllER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1,2 ANTHROPOMETRICS SURVEY REJIARl(.S: PI-19-7/8. I IDIS I NVCl. llED: ~RK N.OOIER LOCATION COf!PONENT NAIE LR-2-459 NR-2-41 N/H-42 NR-2-43 NR-2-45 NR-2-46 NR-2-47 RECORDER RECORDER RECORDER RECORDER RECORDER RECORDER RECORDER SYSTEJII REACTOR ctKlANT !PRI~RY LID>, PWR> SYS NI.Cl.EAR INSTRIJIENTATION SYSTEM NI.CL.EAR INSTRlJENTATION SYSTEM NLCLEAR INSTRUENTATI~ SYSTEM MJCLEAR INSTRlJIENTATION SYSTEJII NLCLEAR INSTRtJtENTATION SYSIDI NOCLEAR INSTRUIIIENTATION SYSTEJll SUBSYSTEM PRESSURIZER SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD StlBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEJ!I FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD 11/11/85

• *
• HUMN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT@ CODE 02/28/86 ASSESS1E~T UlST REVIEW HED t() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~-7 FEED FLOW/STEM FLOW Cl4MEL SELECTOR SWS INCONVENIENTLY LOCATED. ttJ1AN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN (I) R£SPONSE, fff PAOa9I DESCRIPTION:

lDIPLT FD FLCII/STM FLOW OON£L SELECTOR SWS ON BACK PNL BELOI RCRDRS. SHOULD BE RELOCATED WITH R E6 W CTRLS ON l!IAIN CB 17"8 PARA61ti¥>H "'"8£R: 6,8,2,l.A 6.8.2,1,B 6.8.2.l.C SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: RELOCATE CONTROLS TO BENCHBOARD, lff DISPOSITION: DELETE-2 PERS (I), SROUPirE TOSETHER WOULD CAUSE INTERF EREN:E. SELECTOR SWS LO CATED W/ ASSOCIATED DISPLAYS

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-1,2 ANTHROPOETRICS SURVEY RBIARKS: PI-19-10 IT91S INV(L VED: NARK NJIBER LOCATION C011PONENT NAf£ FEED FLIJ,l SW Slll FLIJ,l SW H t()T IN INV FILE 1 H NJT IN INV FILE f SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM 81!@7/85
• *
• HED NO TITLE lilJ!AN EN6INEERirE D1SCREPA1£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT0 CODE 21V23828 CIRC WTR PP/BERG SERV WTR PP CTRI.S Ir<<:ONVENIENTLY LOCATED, KJIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OP REPS(l£.
• Hf PROllBI DESCRIPTI~:

02/28/86 ASSESSIE.~T LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE CD,IPLT 01/07/85 CIRC WTRJ PP/EJIIERS SERV WTR PP CTRLS ON BACK PAt£LS. SHruLD BE ON .BEtOiBOARD, UN PARA6RJ¥>H UBER: 6.8.2..-1.A 6,8.2.1,B 6.8.2.l,C Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CONTROLS TO BENCHBOARD, Hf DISPOSITI~: DELETE-BFP/SFW DATA COLL.ECTION DESCRIPTION~ CO.DE NUl'IB£R: TP-9.2 YERIFICATI~ VALIDATION TP-1.2 ANTHfUIOIIIETRlCS SURVEY REJIIARKS: PI-19-11 ITBIS ltMl.VED: ~AK tUIBER LOCATION COfilPONENT NAIIIE CIRC WTR PP ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEfll /

• HilllAN EN61NE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNITl CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A81791 ~TAINENT ISCLATION VALVE, 1-Sl-73LEFT CPEN. ttJIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPOEE. / fft PIIOILEM DESCRIPTION:

NONE COffl)l.T VALVE INADVERTENTLY LEFT OPEN DURitE PERFOR~ OF PT-18.5, FLUSHI~ IF SENSITIZED STAIN.. ESS STEEL PIPING, 9798 PARA6RAPH tUIBER: 6.1.1.1.A SU66ESTED .IIACl<F IT : ENSURE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS IN PLACE. ENSURE IND£P£NDENT VERIFICATION BY PROC£Dt.JRE. fft DISPOSITION: DELETE-r<<lT A CRDR ISSUE. CONTROL IS LOCAL. INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION IS REOOIRED B

Y. PROCEDURE

• 07/11/85 * ,. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION IWD CODE NUll1BER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATIO. AND VALIDATION ~RKS: HR-lJ. WRITTEN FRIJIII LER-81-053/031..-0 ITEJIIS IrMl.lJED: fARK rtJMBER LOCATION llJIIIPON£NT 'NAIE SYST£111 SUBSYSTEJII 1-SI-73 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t *

• • *
• HUfllAN Et,6INEERING*DISCREPANCV REPORT SURRY UNIT1 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSfllENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21A81712 CIRCUIT BREAKERS FllJND !PEN. COlllPI.T IUAN ERROR: ACCIDENT~

ACTIVATI~ ~y Cl.JASE DELAY /ERROR IN !JI RESPONSE. HI PROll.EN DESCRIPTION: _ IC>Y-1S68A OPEN. REDUND£NT FLO PATH FOR LHSI PP "B" FOONDErERSIZED. IC>Y-SW-282B OPEN, WOULD r<<>T ~TO CLOSE IF REG 8788 PARAGRAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.1.1.1.A SU66£STED BACKFIT: INVESTIGATE THE FEASIBILITY IF PUTilrE GUARDS AROl.ND THECIRCUIT BREAKER TO AVOID ACCIDENTA L ACTIVATION. '** DISPOSITI~: DELETE-ffJT A CRDR ISSUE. BRm<ERS ARE LQCl:l., .r<<JT IN JICR

• DATA Cll.LECTI~

DESCRIPTION .AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REIWIKS: HR-14. WRITIEN FRQIII LER-81-838/831.--0, LER-Sl-047/03l--0. IIDIS INYCl.lJED: -MRK N.JIIIBER LOCATI~ COIIIPOHENT ,-ff NJT IN INV FILE f ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll 07/11/85 l I I

• *
• HUMN £N6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNITl CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED I'() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 21Al2412 DISPLAY OOTPUT REQUIRES COOVERSI~.

NOD I -2 KJR,j ERROR: DISPLAY INTERPRETATION. ERROR. lff PROa.EN DESCRIPTI~: PROCEDURE <ES-9.21 REQUIRES !PERATOR TO DETERMINE CCXl.OOffi RATE -DISPLAYED VALL£ IS ABSOL UTE r<<JT RATE ** 17N PA~ ttJIIBER: 6.5.1.2.B SU66ESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE DISPLAY OF ~TIR. COOUJOWN RATE -E. 6. COJIPUTED VALUE. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO VD-7 (238024861. DISPLAYS l4lVE BEEN ADDED TO THE P.250 COPIPUTER SYSTEM

• DATA ClllECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUABER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RBIARKS: VI-41 ITEJIIS INW.YED: ~RK tUlllER LOCATI!l4 COflPOtENT TR-2-413 TR-2-423 PAB412 RECORDER PAAA 14 RECORDER SYSTEfll REACTOR coo.ANT <PRI~RY LOOP, PWRJ SYS REACTOR ~T <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEfll 07/11/85

• *
• TITLE 21Ae5119 DIESEL FIRE PIJfl) FlE. OIL T~. ERROR: ADflINISTRATIVE OVERSIGHT.

fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT1 [l)DE 02/28/86 ASSESSfilENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE COP!LPT 07/11/85 1/0LIJIE OF FUEL IN FUEL OIL TAN< FOR DIESEL DRIVEN FIRE PUflP DR(J)PEJ) BEL!M l'IINIIUI. 8708 PA~RAPH NUP!BER: 6.1.1.1.A SOOGESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE ADJIINISTRATIVE CONTROLS IN Pl.AC£. fff DISPJSITION: DELETE-NOT A CRDR ISSLE. TANK IS FILLED LQCj:k.LY, DATA ClllECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlmBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION ~S: H~-12, WRITTEN FROPI LER-81-076/03L--0 I TBIS INYCl. i.tD 1 NARI< tUIBER UICATI~ CQIIIPOf£NT ,-SYSTEl4 DIES FIRE PP ff t()T IN ItN FILE

• SUBSYSTEl'I
• *
• ttJIIIAN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22981139 DAN6ER/WARNirE/SAFETY INSTRl£TI~

LABELS r<<JT APPROPRIATE. NOD II -5 IUIRN ERROR: INAPPIO>RIATE IPERATOR RESPCrEE. UO< Cf' OPERATOR REPONSE. Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: DANSER, 11¥1RNirE, AND SAFETY INSTRUCTION LABELS ARE r<<JT DESistED IN ACCORDArCE W/ APPROPRIA. TE SAFETY STANDARDS. 17te PARAGRAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.6.3.9.B SJ66ESTED BACKFIT: RE~ DESC~T DAN3ER/11¥1RNIN6/SAFETY LABELS W/ LABELS THAT ARE DESI6t£D IN ACCORDANCE W/ APPRCPRIATE STANDS, fl,f DISPOSITI~: REFER TO C-23 (22A01147>

• DATA C(UECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ CODE UBER: TH, I LABELS LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-8 ITEMS Ih\lCl.VED:

!ARK NJIIIBER LOCATION COOJr£NT NAfllE DANSER LABEL SAFETY LABEL IIIRNINS LABS ff tfJT IN INV FILE f ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff r(JT IN INV FILE f SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM "7 /11/85

• *
• ttJ~ EN61NE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE < ASSESSP1£NT LAST REVIEW HED f() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22991481 OBSTROCTED

~TRll.. ll:CESS. tlJMN ERROR: PEl!S(JR INJURY. DELAYED OCCESS TO/FROI! CR. M,1A6E TO EOOIPfl ENT BRtUlHT THROL&I DOORWAY. Hf PR(JllD DESCRIPTION: c:oi-.PLT L.6£ 00!.TS W/ WIPE MJTS tt'.JRIZONTALLY PROTRUDE FR()! CR ~CESS DOORS <DOORS Be:T CR & LOUt<<> AIOJT 3 FT A9JVE FLOOR 8780 PARAGRAPH N.lfl!BER: 6.1.1.3.C.1 QJSSESTED BACKF IT: StERTEN/REJIOVE/COVER .BOLTS AND WI,E MJTS. Hf DISPOSITION: DEl.£TE. IIIR TO Be: WR I TIEN AS PART Of' USUAL CR AA INT PROS. NOT DOOR OPS MJRmLL Y US E, f()T ~IDERED IN CRDR SCOPE DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUflBER: TP-1.1 l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY RalARKS: DS-7 ITEMS INYCL W>: MAK tU1B£R LOCATION CQIIPCJtENT SYSTEJII SUBSYSi£JII CR DOORS ff f()T IN IN\/ FILE t ., v,6/07/85

• *
• 1tJMN EteINEERirE DISCREPAt£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSfl!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22AN111 STATIC ELECTRICITY CAUSES ERRATIC RBIDINGS CF IETERS. ti.A ERROR: ERROR IN o>ERATOR REsm.sE. j HI PROB.Bl DESCRIPTICN'4:

STATIC ELEC r.AUSirE lfiRS TO STIDVACT ERRATIC/SO llJT CALIBRATION. 0718 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5.1.2..F SOOGESTED BACKFIT: CQll!Pl.T INITIATE STUDY TO ID*NT1FY CAUSE OF STATIC ELECTRICITY AND BEST MEANS OF ELIMINATING IT. HI DISPOSITION: DELETE-cAAPETING TO LOW STATIC. I.WSTAT IS PERIODICALLY USED TO REDUC£ STATIC ELE CTRICITY

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION CODE NUMBER:
• TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND ',qIIJATION REJIIARKS:

P.9.2-17 *. 871110 6UID*LINE 6512F CLOSEST TO PROBLEM D£5CRIP. ITBIS INYCLl,E): NAIi< fUIBER LOCATION C(]MP(J£NT NAIE . SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM IETERS HNOT IN INV FILE t 87/11/85

• *
• tt>>1AN EN61NE£R1N6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02./28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22AN112 lll.Y 31* BETWEEN F~ IF SS STATl()l AND LCIIER PANEL. tlR ERROR: ACCIDENT~

ACTIIJATI()l IF CONTRO.S FR!Ji! BODY CONTACT OR CONTA CT WITH DESl</CHAIR. 1H PROJl.EN DESCRIPTION: NINHUI SEPARATif>I CF 36' FRIJI BACK OF fWY DESI< TO ANY IPPOSIN6 SURFACE IS VIOI.ATED. 0700 PARASRAPH NIJIIBER: 6.1. 1. 3. E. 1 Slll6ESTED BACKFIT: COPIPI..T MlVE SS STA TO LOCATION IN PRll'!ARY OPERATING AREA LARS£ ENOL6H TO PROVIDE SPACE REQUIRED B Y 6UIDEL1t£S. fff DISPOSITil>I: DELETE-6UIDEL1t£ REFERS TO AREA BET REAR IF DESK & CPPOSINS SURFACE, HEil ER~O USLY REFERS TO F~T (REJIIARKSl DATA C:Oll.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIBER: TP-1. l WORKSPACE SURVEY REMRKS: C-4. DISP: IF DESI< AND PAIEL. ITBIS !NUil. VEDz -MRK !UBER LOCATION c:o,moT SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEfll SS STATION ff t<<lT IN INV FILE* 07/11/85

• *
• 1tJ111AN EN6IrEERI,.;

DISCREPANCY R£PORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESS/ENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22AN113 IfAIE~TE SPACE BETWEEN EQUIP/Pft.S AND OTHER CPPQSI,.; SURf~S. HlllAN ERROR: INAD£00ATE SM:E FOR PERSONEL TO PERFORM IU REQUIRED TASKS WITIIJUT POSSIBLE ACCIDENT!l. ACTIVATION CF ctNTRCl.S. 1H PAOSL91 DESCRIPTION:

• CONPLT VIClATION IF MINIU SEPARATION IF 50' BETWEEN SI'6..E ROW Cf' EQIJIP/PN.

AND IRL OR OTl£R 0 PPOSIN6 SURF~S. 1718 PARAGRAPH NJfllBER: 6.1.1.3.F.l QJSSESTED BACKFIT: INSTIU QJARDS OVER CONTROLS TO PREVENT INADVERTENT ACTIJlTION. -.. DlSPOSITIDN: DELETE-MJT*IN ACCORDAta W/ SUIDELINES, BUT POSSIBILITY OF ACCID ACTIV LOW. OH F LOOD CTRL PN.. Tl£RE ARE < RIIIRKSl DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUfl!BER: TP-1.1 .<<lRl<SPACE SURVEY REJIIARKS1 C-5. DISP: SOIE TOSSLE SWS, BUT THESE HAVE: f() SFTY CONSEQOCS I TEJIIS INYCL VED1 IARK NJNIIER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAIE SYSTEM . SUBSYSTEJII ANTHROPIJIETR H t()T IN INV FILE* 17/11/85

• * * ..._. EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED l'<<:I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ale2e8 l<<l PRIORITY CTRL PROVIDED.

PA SYS~ BE_OVERRIDDEN W/OOT CR MIU>

• rOE IUIAN ERROR: IJ>ERATORS cru.D IUSS EJiltRSEtCY

~S. Ht PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: SP£MER IN CR CAN BE CONTRW.ED OOTSIDE IF CR WITIOJT OPERATI!Mi PERSOrf£L. KroLED6E. 0710 PARA6RAPtl NI.MBER: 6. 2.1, 6. F Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: COMPLT INSTIU CONTROL FOR ANfOJN SYS IN CR. ALSO SOI£ TYPE OF INDICATION SHOWIN3 STATUS OF SYSTE "(I.E., OR OFFJ. fH DISPOSITICW: D£L£TE-CTR1..S IN ARE EIIIER SW6EAR ROOfl WHICH IS CONTROLLEDACCESS AREA. SYS ONLY S HUTllOll4 FOR REPAIRS/SERVICE (m.R DATA CCIU.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.003ER: TP-2.1 CCIM.NICATIONS SURVEY RBIARl<S: c ... a. DISP: CPS OON' T NEED CTRLS IN CR OR STATUS INDIC. I TENS I NVCl. ',{I): MRK N.JflBER LOCATICW NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEII SYS H l<<JT IN INV FILE t 07/11/85

• *
• HUMN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY. UNIT2 CODE A TITLE 22AN2t9 ~R IS r<<JT POSITICIED IN CR SO THAT IT IS AUDIBLE IN ALL ARBIS IUAN ERROR: ~Y/ERROR IN (J) RESP(N;E.

1H PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 II -5 U/11/85 SPEMER LOCATED ATM END OF CR IS DIFFICll.T TO 1£AT ATOTtER END OF CR. 1711 PARAGRAPtl OBER: 6. 2. 1. 6. c. 2 SU66ESTED MCKFIT: lllYE LIJUDSPm<ER TO PORE CENTRAL LOCATION. ADD SECOND LOODSPEAl(ER TO OTl£R END OF CR. fH DISPOSITION1 REFER TO DS-12 (28811811)

• DATA CCU£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIIIBER:

TP-2.1 l:IJIIIUICATIONS SURVEY IEWl(S: C-7. ITBIS INV(l."9: IIARK NJIGIER LOCATION CQIIIPIJENT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1

• *
• tlJ*IH ENHNEERIN6 DISCREPAOCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE A TITLE 221*211 ~R VCl.lJE art<<JT BE CONTRW..ED IN CR. IIR ERROR: INABILITY TO ADJUST IJOLIJ!E SO ~T ALAmlS CAN BE !£ARD OVER L~R~ fH PROlll.91 DESCRIPTI~:

Ml Vll.lJIE CONTROL PROVID*D IN CONTROL ROOM. UN PARAGRAPH ~BER: 6.2.1.6.E.1 6.2.1.6.E.2 Sl.66ESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE CR WITH LOUDSPEAKER \JOLLIE CONTROL. 11-1 DISPOSITION: REFER TO DS-12 (20N0111l, DATA cru..ECTIC.. DESCRIPTI!li CODE OBER: TP-2.1 COMJNICATIONS SURVEY REMRKS: C-6 IIDIS INVCL \JED: ~IIK MJMBER LOCATION COMPONENT tM SYSTE/4 H r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ASS£88.1ENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -5 07/11/85 SUBSYSTEM /

• *
• ttJA El'4lINEERIN:i DISCREPAt,CY REPORT '112./28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A1Mt3 INSTRtJI/CTRLS THAT REQUIRE CPS TO LEAVE PRIMARY OPERATIN:i AREA tUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN (I) RESP(N;E.

FAILURE TO DETECT* ABr<<lRIR CONDITIONS. j Hf PROll.9I DESCRIPTic>>4: COMPLT LISTED INSTRUIVCTRLS REQ CPS TO LEAVE PRIM OP AREA. FIRE Ptt. LOCS CONSIDERED GREATEST IN:O NVENIEt<<:E. 8718 PARASRAPH N>>IBER: 6.1.1.1.B SU66£STED BACKFIT: Al>m.RTELY ST~F THE COHTROI. ROOM SO THE OPERATOR DOES NOT~ TO LEAVE THE PRIIIIARY (PERA TINS AREA. fH DISPOSITION: DELETE-ST~F C0NSIDER£D PART OF CRDR & BEEN FOUND AD£00ATE. BACKBD & LOCAL OPS 0 NIU SHIFTS. OP !'£ED NOT LEAYE. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION CODE NUIU3ER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ Wl.IDATION REIIARKS: P.9.2-4. IIIOST ITEJIIS ON Pl-104 (29e01203) OR Pl-19 (20At3004) ITEJIIS INVO. \JED: NARK NJIBER LOCATION CQIIIPIJENT tM EHC LOW LYL ElERS DIESEL FIRE DET SYS NI ADJ INSTR SWTCHYD Ptf.. TURB SlJlERYS VENT PN. IEAntER Ptf.. ff NlT IN INV FILE f H r<<lT IN INV FILE I ff NlT IN INV FILE f H l<<lT IN INV FILE I H r<<)T IN INV FILE I H l<<lT IN INV FILE 1 H NlT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 07/11/85

• *
• HUfl!AN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22All888 SHARED EllJIPIENT THAT HAS BEEN A PROSWI HJIAN ERROR: DELAY IN OBTAINING INFO. DELAY /ERROR IN OP RESPIN;E IN ABr<<lR IA. CC*DITI~ 1H PROILEM .11£SCRIPTION:

!HIRED EOOIPfENT CAUSED SOI£ PAOfl.00 WITH ON* OR BOTH ~ITS. 8708 PARAGRMi UBER: 6.1. 3. 1. E. 1 Sl&ESTED BACl(f IT: INVESTIGATE LISTED EQUIP AND PROVIDE SEPARATE EGUIP OR CTRLS AS NEEDED. 1t4 DISPOSITION: DELETE-EXISTING OP PROC FOR SHARED SYS GOVERN PROPER OP OF SYSTE/IIS. IF FOLLOWED, NO PROaBI WITH SYS. (R91ARKSl DATA COU£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.Jl!BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION REJflllKS: P.9.2-5. SEE P.9.2-7 <~l ITEJIIS INVCL \B: . MAK IOIBER LOCATION COflONENT PM 13 BER ll6 BA XFER .IIIRON 11:RYY C(ll)NT D..N6 SAS WST SYS RSRV STA SER VENT PN.. ff NlT IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE t ff r.lJT IN INV FILE t ff f<<JT IN INV FILE t ff r.lJT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff r.lJT IN INV FIL£

• SYSIDI SUBSYSTE/11 a>>IPLT U/11/85
• *
• HlJIIIANEreINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Alll89 STATUS CF HIE> ElllIPtENT IS NOT DISPLAYED~

BOTH ~TRll. BOARDS ltJIAN ERROR: MISINTERPffETATI~ Cf' EQUIPfENT STATUS. DELAY IN ASSESSI"3 PL ANT STATUS. ffl PRml.91 DESCRIPTI~: CQIIPt..T HRED EQUIP STATl.6 NOT DISPLAYED. BOP LIST D0ESN' T SHtMP IN BOTH ~ITS. CONTirt.OJS PlMT STATUS NOT IIIIINTAINED 17'11 PARAGRAPH r<<.JfmER: 6.1.3.1.E SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE STATUS Cf' SHARED EQUIPIENT ON BOTH CONTROL BOARDS. ffl DISPOSITION: DELETE-BACKBOARD IP IS PROVIDED TO JIIJNITOR SHARED EQUIPION BACKBOARDS> AND INFO RIii IP CF BOTH UNITS Cf' STATUS. DATA COL.l.£CTION D£SCRIPTI0N CODE NUt&:R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION REMARKS: P.9.2-6 ITEMS INVCL\£Ih IIIIRK NJIIIBER LOCSlTI~ COPIPONENT rM: llJX FD PP CIRC WATER CTMT HI RN6 SfllKE DIS PN ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN IIW FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN IIW FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM '6/17/85 ---,

• *
• tUIAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT

~T REVIEW t£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Allll8 MJDR L.AiE.S ARE NOT iuAYS USED HAE NECESSARY. lt.M ERROR: IFCREASED SEARCH TlflE. ERROR IN CP RESP(ME. lff PROa.91 DESCRIPTI!l1: !II£ IIAJOR SYSTE91 AND IP£RATOR WRKSTATIOO ARE f(]T IDENTIFIED BY fllAJOR LABELS, 8718 PARAGRAPH NlMBER: 6. 6. 1. 2. A. 1 SI.BESTED BACl<FIT: ADD fllAJOR 1.ABB.S HR£ NECESSARY. ftf DISPOSITI!l1: REFER TO LABELIM; STUDY PHl2 (20Ae110ll

• DATA cru.ECTI~

DESCRIPTION AND CODE ,._.A: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SUIMY ITEJIS IJM1.VED1 ~RK tUIIER LOCATION COIIOENT SYSTEM . LABELS H "3T IN INV FILE 1 SUBSYSTEPI II -6 08/87/85

• *
• HED NO ltJMAH ENGINEERING DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY LNIT2 CODE B TITLE . 22A81119 SlBJRDINATE LABELS ARE NOT It.WAYS USED HRE NECESSARY.

tUIAH ERROR: Ir<<:REASE SEAD TIME, ERROR. IN IJ) RESPCNiE. INHBITED LEARN I N6. 1H PROa.£111 DESCRIPTION: 02./28/86 ASS£SSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE . EN6 II -6 BB/97/85 !DE SUBSYSTEMS AND AKTic>>A. GRW>S ARE NOT IDENTIFIED BY SUBORDINATE LAB£LS. 0711 PAIIAGRAPH rtMBER: 6. 6.1. 2. A. 2 St&ESTED BACKFIT: ADD SUBORDINATE LABELS WHERE NECESSARY. 1H DISPOSITI~: REFER TO LABELINS STUDY PI-82 12W1111), DATA COJ.ECTI()4 DESCRIPTI()4 AND CODE l'UIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY IDAAKS: DS-33 I TEJIIS INYCl. VED : ~AK NNER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAIi£ SYSTEJII LABELS

• H NJT IN INV FILE 1 SUBSYSTEJII
• *
• tf.JIIAH EN6INEERirE DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B HED Nil TITLE 22Al1111 A FEW C(Nl{JENTS lilVE Nil C(Jl!ll(J£NT LABEL. -ltJIAN ERROR:, THIE DELAYS. ERROR IN CllERATOR RESP!NiE.

'tff PROa.91 DE!l:RIPTIDN: Tl£RE ARE A FEW COJIQ£NTS Tt'AT !-'AVE NI) COIIIPOr£NT LABEL 1718 PARAGRAPH OfER: 6. 6. 1. 2. A. 3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: ADD LABELS, tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABELirE STUDY PI-82 (28All181l

• DATA COl.l.ECTIDN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl&:R: TP-6.1 LABELS LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
• RBIARKS1 DS-34 ITBIS INV(l. YED: MRK IUIB£R LOCATION COIIIONENT PM H NJT IN INV FILE f SYSTEM / 02/28/86 ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -6 e8/l7/85 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• lt1"AN EN6IN£ERitE DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B TITLE 22Qall ll I.ABELS REPEAT INFORMATicrt. ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESPONSE.

/ Hf PROfliN DESCRIPTIIJ4: Hf SOME LABELS REPEAT Itf=O!MlTlON 6IVEN BY H16t£R-LEYEL LABELS. 1788 PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER:

6. 6. 1. 2. A. 4 S006ESTED BACl<FIT:

OIFY LABELLI"1 AS r£CESSARY, DISPOSITICW: REFER TO LJma.IN6 STUDY PI-82 (20Ael10ll DATA CCllECTI!:.4 DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ~Rl<S: Df,-35 ITEJIIS UMl JED: !!Ala<~'~ LOCATI~ CQ!IIPO£NT SYSTEIJ! LABELS H r<<JT IN INV FILE t 02/28/86 ASSESS11£NT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -6 08/07/85 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• TITLE IOAN ENiINEERirE DISCREPAf£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22Allll2 SOE LABELS ARE NOT SIZED ACCORDirE TO TIEIR HIERARCHI~

LEVEL. IUIAH ERROR: 11£LAY IN LOCATIN6 C0IIIP()£NTS. 1H PROBlBI DESCRIPTI~: 02/28/86 ASSESSENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -6 88/17/85 SOfE LABELS ARE NJT PR(J)ERLY SIZED/GRADUATED ~IN; TO Tf£IR HIERARCHI~ LEVEL. 1788 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.6.1.2.. B SI.E6ESTED 8ACKF IT: ENSURE LABEL LETTER SIZES ARE 6R~TED ACCORDir.G TO THEIR HIERARCHICAL LEVEL. 1H DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABELitE STUDY PI-82 <2A1101>, DATA ctLLECTI~ DESCRIPTini. iwD CODE NOO!ER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ~Rl(S: DS-36 ITEMS IfMl.VED: _ NARK LOCATION IDPOtOT tAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 1.ABEl.S. H t()T IN INY FILE t

• *
• ltJIIIAN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPA1£Y REPORT . SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIIIENT UlST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Alll14 SCIE umELS ARE NOT POS1Tl1)£1)

TO PROVIDE ~TE LABEL USABILITY tUIAN ERROR, DElAY /ERROR IN READIN6/<P RESP(NE. Hf PRCIILEJII Da:RIPTI~: EN6 SOI£ ~TS~ LABELS THAT ARE t<<JT POSITIMD TO PROVIDE ADEOOATE VISIBILITY OR BEST ASSOCIATIVE YJl.lE. 87N PA~ NJMBER: 6.6.2.1.A 6.6.2.1.B 6.6.2.l.C SU66ESTED JIACKFIT: REPOSITION/RELOCATE/RESIZE LABELS THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO SEE. LABS SHOULD BE PLACED FOR SRE ATEST VISIBILITY. DISPOSITI~: REFER TO LABELING STUDY PHl2 (20Ail10U DATA C(ll£CTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NlJIIIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ~S: DS-37 ITEMS IfML \IED 1 Ml< NJIIIBER LOCATII* COf!P(HNT NW£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t 98/97/85

• *
• tlJMN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al1117 SOE LABELS ARE r<<lT t(IRIZOOfUY ORIENTED.

CQIIIPLT IIMAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESPONSE. lff PROll.EN DESCRIPTI~: S(J£ LABELS ARE NOT lflRIZONTfUY ORIENTED. THEY INCLUD£ ABOOT 7tf. OF TI£ CONTRIJ.. POSITI~ UIIE.S. 87N PARAGRAPH rtl&R: 6.6.2.3.A.1 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: ENSURE fU LABELS ARE l()RIZONTIUY ORIENTED WHERE SPACE PERl!IITS. lff DISPOSITION: DELETE-LABEI.S ARE READABLE FOR CONTROL POSITIONS. r<<J ~TION NEEDED

• DATA c:ru.ECTI~

DESCRIPTI!l4 AND CODE OBER: TP-6. 1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REIIARKS: DS-38 I1DS IfMl.VED: MIi< rullER LDCATI~ COIIIPC>>ENT NM:: SYSTEM IIITARIES HNOT IN INV FILE f SUBSYSTEM ea/97/85

• *
• lUIAH ENSINEERlNS DISCflEPA.t£Y REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE HED I() TITLE 22Aill18 CURVED LABELS SOETIIES USED. IUIAN ERIOI: READirE ERROR CAUSirE DELAY/ERROR IN I)) RESPIIEE.

Ht PROa9I DESCRIPTION: ABOOT 7t'/. IF Tl£ LISTED ITEPIS CURVED LABELS. Ht 071)8 PARAGRAPH DIER: 6.6.2.3.B SU66ESTED BAO(FIT: REPt.OCE CURVED LABELS. DISPOSITION: -DELETE-OJRVED LABELI~ IS READABLE. I'() 1¥::TICN NEEDED

• DATA ro.J.ECTICN DESCRIPTICN AND CODE OBER: T~.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-39 IIDIS INVCl.lJED:

~RK NJIBER LOCATICN CDllONENT NAIE CI~ KTRS. J~ ROTARS ff t()T IN INV FILE t ff l'()T IN INV FILE t SYSIDI 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE CORT 08/U/85 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• ltJMAN EH6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 8 t£D t<<) TITLE 22Al1121 A FEW UIBELS ARE MISSPELLED.

IUIAN ERROR1 DELAY/ERROR IN IJI RESPCIEE. INHIBITED 1.£ARNIN6, DIFFICll.TY I N REFERRIN6 TO COl>Of'ENTS. 1H PRO!l.91 IIESCRIPTI()I: , FEW LABELS MISPEI..LED l<<JRDS/ABBREVIATIOHS. 9788 PARAGRAPH NUABER: 6.6. 3.2. F SU66ESTED BACKFIT: CORRECT SPELLIN6 ERRORS. 1H DISPOSITION: REFER Tr LAPEL!~ STUDY PI-82 (28A0rn11>

• DATA CCUECTICW DESCRIPTICN AND CODE ro!BER: TP-6. 1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY
• RE~RKS: DS-~ ITEMS Ilf..il.VED:

IIAIIK UJ:IER LOCATII* CQlll)(J£NT SYSTE/11 H t<<>T IN INV FILE t ! 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 II -6 08/97/85 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• tU!AN EN6INEERirE DISCREPAP<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE. REsmGIBILITY STATUS DATE ~1121 Ull!ELS NJT CONSISTENT IN USE CF WRDS, ACRIIMIS, ABBREVIATIIN3.

II -6 97/15/85 IIIIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN (W) REsm&:. INilBITED LEARNING. ' j *'* PROllBI DESCRIPTII*: LABELS ARE NJT CONSISTENT WITHIN AND ACIESS PIECES CF EQUIPIENT IN TI£IR USE CF hORDS/ACRO NYNS/ABBREVIATI~ 8711 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6.6.3.3.B !UiSESTED BACKF IT: CORRECT LABELING TO ENSURE COOISTOCY.

• '* DISPOSITII*:

REFER TO LAIIELirE STUDY PI-82 (2All01)

• DATA cru.ECTI!i.

DESCRIPTION AND CODE tDBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATlON AIDS SURVEY ~ll<S: DS-41 ITEJIIS INW..IJED1 IIAIIK tUIIER LOCATI~ COIIPIJ£NT NAfE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ' LABELS H NJT IN UN FILE f

• *
• TITLE IUIAN EN6INEERirf3 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 COIE B 22A81122 SYISl.S ARE l()T USED meISTENTLY.

11.M ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESP(HE. IffiIBITED LEARNlfti, fff PROaEJil DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -6 08/(117/85 SOfE SYIIIBO..S .DO l()T STlWIIARD C0ff'l6URATIONS AND smE ARE l()T CONSISTENTLY USED WITHIN IMIE PANELS. 171e PARAGRAPH N.JIIIBER: 6.6.3,4,C 6.6.3.4.D SU66ESTED BACKFIT: CORRECT INCONSISTOCIES. 1+t DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABELirf3 STUDY PI-82 C2A1101), DATA ro..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-6.1 LAB8.S AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJW'.IRKS: DS-42 IIDIS UML IJED: -MAK fUIBER LOCATION COIRJfENT NAIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H l()T IN IW FILE t

• *
• TITLE ~1123 SCI£ LABELS USE tUEIR.S, tUIAN ERROR: READING ERRORS. Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: ENSINEERING DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B APPROX 5j CF LAB8.S US£ RO~ N.>>ERALS.

Hf 87N PARASRAPH OBER: 6.6.3.4.E SlESESTED BACKFIT: MJIIERALS WITH NI.JffllERS/LETTERS, DISPOSITION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITV STATUS DATE II -6 08/07/85 REFER TD UUIELING STUDY PI-82 (20A0110ll TO ENSURE ALL ROMAN tUIERAL USAGE IS WI THIN INDUSTRY.COMNTION

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJIIIBER:

TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-43 IIDIS INY0.. IJED1 MIIK rtlfmER LOCATION COl'.PONENT ,-SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H MJT IN IPN FILE *

• *
• HED NO HU~ ENGINEERING DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 a:me: B TITLE 22A81124 Ulll£LS ARE NOT LOCATED A9:M Fl.N:TI!IA.

GROOPS Tt£V IDENTIFY. IUIAN ERROR: 11£LAY IN LOCATihS cm1)()£NTS. IUSASSOCIATINi C0JllClr£NTS WITH WID6 LABEL tH PRQIUIII DESCRIPTI~: 02/28/86 ASSES5.'!ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -6

• 18/U/85 MNY SUBSYS/FIK SRW> LABELS ARE NOT~ ABOVE THE C()fl)(MNT SRO.PS THEY IDENTIFY.

0700 PARASRAPH NlJIBER: 6.6.3. 7.B SllJGESTED IW){FIT: PLACE UUE.S ABOVE SRO.PS. t-11 DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABEL!Ni STUDY PI-82 (20Ae110ll DATA CCllECTI~ DESCRIPTION CODE l'UIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS IWD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY RalARKS: DS-.44 ITEMS INW.. VED: NARK ttJIIIBER LOCATION COIIIONENT ,-SYSTEM LABELS ff NOT IN INV FIL.£ 1 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HUflAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPAt£Y REPORT 02/28/86 StJRRY UNIT2 OJDE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO . TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 221101126 CNTll. POSITICl4S NOT IDENTIFIED SOE DISCRETE FIKTICNl.

CONTRCl. ENS IUIAN ERROR: ItelRRECT CPERATI~ CF COfTRCL Ht PROll.9! DESCRIPTI~: CONTRCl. POSITIONS ARE t(Jf IDENTIFIED~ SOI£ DISCR£TE FU<<:TIIJA. CONTROLS. 07N PARAGRAPH IOll£R: 6.6.3.8.A SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: PROVIDE 1U CONTROLS WITH ~ROPRIATE POSITION IDENTIFICATION LABELS. '*' DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABELHE STUDY PI-82 (29A01l01) DATA CD..LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJll£R: TP-6.1 LABa.S 1WD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMA~S: 6-1 DISC ROTARS SYSTE/ll H r<<JT IN INV FILE t II -6 98/87/85 StJBSYSTE/ll

• *
• t<<.JflAN ENSINEERIMJ DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 alDE B TITLE 22All129 I.ETTER t£19ffS t<<JT SAIE FOR ill LABELS WITHIN SAIE HIERARCHICll.

LI/ ti.A ERROR: DELAY IN CP RESm4SE. HfHBITED LEARNIMJ. fH PROIUJII DESCRIPTION: L£TTER t£1SHTS I/ARY FOR LABEI.S CF Tt£ SAIE HIERARCHICAL LEVEL 071N PARA6JW)H NIJIBER: 6. 6. 4. 1, A. 2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: 192/28/86 RSSESSlllENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -6 08/07/85 RELABEL TO ENSURE CONSISTENT LEITTR HEISHTS FOR ALL LABELS WITHIN THE SAIE HIERARCHI~ LE va. '** DISP0SITIIJ1: IIEFER TO LABEL INS STUDY PI-82 (2'JA01101 l

• DATA C(UECTI~ DESCRIPTI!J1 AND rone l't.lABER:

TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURI/EV REJIIARKS1 DS-45 ITEMS INYll.lJED: fARK IUIBER LOCATIIJ4 COfillOt£NT t'1IE LABELS ff NJT IN IfN FILE f SYSTEJII SUBSYSTE!II !

• • *
• ttJl!AN ENGINEERING DISCREPAJCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY lJHT2 CO~ B ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22All138 SOI£ LABELS tfWE LIGHT CHARACTERS ON A DARK BAO<SRCUUl.

tlM ERROR: READING ERRORS ..0 lifiITE ~RACTERS BE.COE COVERED BY DIRT/ SRI,£ AND LOSE C()ffRAST WITH BLAD< ~R<DD. fff PROBUll DESCRIPTION: SOI£ LABELS <1¥>PROX 15j) LISHT CHA~TERS ()j A DARKBACKSROUND. 0700 PA~RAP!i OBER: 6. 6. 4. 1. B, 1 Sl.66ESTED BAD<FIT: ENS USE DARK CHA~TERS ON A LI6HT BACl<SROUND SUCH AS BLACK LETTERS ON lf!ITE. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABEL.INS STUDY PI-82 (20A01101) IOEVER, ESCUTOiEON PLATES WILL NOT BE etmE), MTA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUBER: TP-6,1 LABELS AND LOCATI~ AIDS SURVEY REJIIARKS: DS-46 I TEJIIS INVCl. VED1 IIARK tUIBER LOCATION C()IIJl()r*NT PM SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII LABELS H r()T IN INV FIL£ I II -6 08/U/85 -* *

• TITLE EN6INEERHE DISCREPAACY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 8 22Alt1132 It<<:ORRECT

~R WIDTHS USED FOR SOME LABELS. IUIAN ERlllfl: NISREADINS LA8ELS. Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~: 02/28/86 ASSESSlENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 00 11 -6 BS/17/85 SOIE LABELS~ CHARACTER WIDTHS THAT DO NJT eot.FDRl!I TD QJIOO..INE RECOIIENDATIOO. 87N PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.6.4.2.B, 1 6.6.4.2.B.2 SIJHSTED BOCKFIT: RELABEL AS t£CESSARY TO ENSURE lti L.ABaS HAVE CORRECT CHA~TER WIDTHS. Hf DISP0SITI~1 REFER TO LABELirE STUDY PI~82 <20A91101), DATA co..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUl'<<IER: TP-6,1 LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ~S: DS-47. LTR WIDTH TO 16ff RATIO SHOULD BE BET 1:1 & 3:5. ITEMS INVCI. \tl>: -~IIK MJMBER LOCATI~ !nRIENT ,-SYSTEM H NJT IN INV FILE

• SUBSYSTE!JI
• *
• ttJA ENSIIEERINS DISCREPAN'.:Y REPORT SURRY 1.WIT2 CODE B 02/2B/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~1133 SCIE LABELS HAVE IMPRCPER ~RACTER STRIJ<E-ijlDTHS.

ltJIIIAN ERROR: IUSREADIN6 LABELS. 1H PAmUJII DESCRIPTIIJC: STID<E WIDTlt-T!rCHARACTER t£16HT RATIOS AR£ NJT BEn£EN 1:6 1:8. 07N PARAGRAPH PUIBER: 6.6.4.2.C SOOGESTED BACl<FIT: ENG II -6 ENSURE LABEL CHARACTERS~ STROKE WIDTHS SUCH THAT THEIR STROKE WIDTH-TD-HEISHT RATIOS A RE BETIEEN 1 :6 AND l :8 1H DISPOSITIIJC: REFER TO LABEL.INS STUDY PHl2 (2M01101)

• DATA CCUECTILN DESCRIPTICJ4 AND CO~ NUMBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY I TENS INVil. YED 1 IIARK ttER LOCATION CQlll)(Jt£NT NAIE SYSTE/11 51.JBSYSTEJII LABELS H f()T IN IIN FILE
• 08/97/85
• *
• tlJIIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY U'4IT2 CODEC 02/28/86 ASSESSfllENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 221111135 TAIHlJT LABELS 00 t<<JT CLEA!l.Y IDENTIFY eollOENTS/EOOIPIENT.

ltJAI ERROR: IDENTIFYING WROE EOOIP9ENT/C(N)()£NT AS BEINi OJT-IF-sERVIC E. Hf PRml.91 I£SCRIPTIC1H: NOD III-8 TA6-WT UUIELS 00 t<<JT CL£ARLY/OCCURATELY IDOOIFY !IJT-(f'-SERVICE CllfllJ()£NTS/EOOIMNT. 0700 ~RAPH NIJIBER: 6.6.5.1.D Sl.8£STED BACKFIT: ENSURE LABELS CLEARLY/ACCURATELY ID£NT1FY !XJT-0:-SERVICEEOOIP/COl'IPCJENTS. SEE PI-86 (28All 201 I I PI-87 (28A838I4I Hf DISPOSITION: RECOIIEND IIIIPWIENTIN6 COIIP\fTER SENERATEr, TA6-0UT SYSTEJII DATA Cll.LECTICIH DESCRIPTION AND CODE l'OIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY I TEJIIS INVCl. VED: fARK !OBER LOCATION COfllOte.T till£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM TAS-OOT LBLS H NJT IN IrfJ FILE 08/97/85

• *
• tiJfllAH EHSINEERIN6 D1SCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESS.'ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPl:WSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A81137 TBIIORARY LABELS 00 t<<IT eot=Ofllll TO SOOD It= PRlfCIPLES.

11.R ERROR: It<<:ORRECT/DEUlYED RESPC>>IS£. Hf PROIIL9I IIESCRIPTI~: !DE TEMPORARY LABELS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ SlJ0-1 AS Tf<<lSE LISTED

• i7N ~RAPH UBER: 6. 6. 5. 1. A 6. 6. 5. 1. B S006ESTED BACKFIT: ENS II -6 REPLAC£ THOSE TEJIIP LABELS W/ PERPIANENT LABELS & DEVISE srnE IETHOD TO ENSURE TEJIIP LABELS A RE LESIBLE ll£N USED. 1H DISP0SITICl4:

REFER TO PI-82 (28Ai11i1> LABELIIE STUDY

• DATA ro..LECTICN DESCRIPTIOO AND CODE lfflBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-4. IIDIS IfML IJED: ~RK tUl8ER LOCATI~ COlflO£NT MAfE )(EV IP ROTAR LEGEND PBS PROC CTll.S ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t H r<<JT IN INV FILE
• SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 07/11/85
• *
• tlJA EN6INEERil'E DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 OlllE 02/28/86 ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW l£D t() TITLE RESl)()elBILITY STATUS DATE 22A81138 IEANIN6S CF A FEW N!)HESEND INDICATORS LIQlTS ARE t()T APPARENT, It.JAi ERROR: . MISINTERPRETATI~

CF IESSA6E.* IN:ORRECT RESP!MlE. tH PROllEM DESCRIPTION: CCJR.T ~Il'E CF LIGHTS ARE r<<lT IIIIIEDIATELY l4>PARENT AND r<<l LABELS ARE USED TO IDENTIFY THEIR IE ANIN6 "9 LIT, 1718 PARAGRMi ro!BER: 6.5.3.2,A, l !IJ66ESTED BACKF IT: ADD lAIIELS TO IDENTIFY ~If& INTENDED BY LIGHTS lli£N LIT, tH DISPOSITION: DEl.£TE-SYSIDI PAS BEEN REIDIIEN>ED FOR PER PI-117 (2\1111101113), DATA cru.ECTICl4 DESCR1PTICl4 AND OlDE NIJIBER: TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-31-1 ITBIS INVCLVED: fAIIK rt.llBER LOCATI~ !Dll!HNT rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM WST DISP PN. ff r<<lT IN INV FILE f / 07/11/85

• *
• ltR OOINEERil'E DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE C HED r<<l TITLE 22A81148 LABELS l()T PERIODICALY CLEAfED, tUAI ERROR: READINi ERRORS, DELAY IN IP RESPONSE.

ffl PRClll.EJII DESCRIPTJON: / 82/28/86 ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILlTY STATUS DATE III-8 12/14/86 ADIIIINISTRATlYE PROCEDURES~ NlT BEEN ESTABLIStE> TO ENSURE PERIODIC CLEANING IF LABELS, 07N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6. 6. 2. 4. D SU66ESTED BACKFIT: ESTABLISH ADIIIINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR PERIODIC CLEAN!~ LABELS. ffl DISPOSITION: ADMIN PROCEDURE 29 WILL ADDRESS THIS

• DATA cw.ECTioi.

DESCRIPTioi. CODE OBER: TP-6. l lJlBELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-3,l ~ICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW ~I DS-14 I TENS IIMl.1 ,tlh MAia< rtJN9ER LOCATION COfJQENT rA£ Ill CR LBLS ff NlT IN UN FILE I SYSTEM SUBSYST01

• *
• ltJMH EhSIN£ERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22M1141 MEMIN8S CF IDP LABEL ca.ORS Ir<<DEIST W/ ca.OR IEANINSS asatER r<<ID II -5 tlJAI ERROR: . NISINTERPRETATI~

CF LABEL flEANirf:i. tH PROILEN DESCRIPTION: SIJ£ RED AND YELL!M TBIPORARY LABELS lfWE ~Irf:iS THAT AR£ r<<JT CDEISTENT WITH 6UIDELir£S 6516C2 8718 PARA6RAPH tUIBER: 6.6.6.3 SJ66ESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE RED ~D YELLIJil COLORED LABELS FOLLOW 1£ANIN6S GIVEN IN SUIDELINE. tH DISPOSITION: REFER TO C-23 (22A01147l WHICH WILL GOVERN TE14PORARY LABEL DESIGN Ir<<:L.UDirf:i COLO R. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl.fflBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJIARKS: DS-17 ITEJIIS IrMl '.tlh ~RK ltJIBER

• LOCATI~ COllCl£NT M'.llE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H NJT IN INV FILE 1 07/11/85
• *
• tUIAH ENBifEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE A 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED f() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 221181144 INSlFFICIENT W.TRCl. POSITION LABEL VISIBILITY.

ttJlllN ERROR: ~INS CONTROL IN WR(N; POSITION. DELAYED CPERATOR RESPIHlE 1H PROll9I D£SCRIPTIC1f1 NOD II -5 llUE TO Cl*TRCl. LOCATION~ GUARD DESIGN, Tf£ COHTRCl. POSITION L.ABLES ARE NJT VISIIIL£ FRIii rt1RIR. CJ) POSITIIA 8718 PARAGRMi NJMBER: 6.6.3.8.C SU66£STED BACt<F IT: 1¥>PLY SWITOi POSITION LABELIN6 ClJTSIDE ABOVE GUARDS. 1H DISPOSITION: VENT PNL: RELOCATE LABEL OOTSIDE IF COVER, REFER TO LABELING STUDY PER PI-82 (21 Alllil)

• DATA COL1.£CTION 11£SCRIPTION AND CODE NUIBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ~RKS: DS-22 I T9IS lNYll. i.£1) I ~II< PUIBER LOCATION COllla*NT NAME SYSTat IIIV-2358 VB2-I1I-c5 VBI-IV-29 EAA282 DISCRETE ROTARY CONTAINENT WOJ!II SYSIDI ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTat BORATION 11/38/86
• *
• HUMN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 02./28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Alll~ IUE6Ill.E l.AllELLIN6, KR ERROR: READirti ERRORS. ~y IN IP RESP(NE. lff PROa..91 11ESCRIPTI1*1 ENS II -6 SCJE IF Tl£ LISTED ITEPIS ARE DIFFICULT TD READ BE~ THEY ARE WRN OR .ll£EN PARTI~ Y PAINTED OVER. t71i) PARAGRAPH rtJJIBER:

6.6.1, l !IJ66£STED BACKFIT: ~/REPAIR LABELS AS r£CESSARY. ESTABLISH ADIIIIN PROCTO ENSURE LABELS REJIAIN EASILY IDE NTIFIABLE/AEADAll.E, lff DISPOSITI~: REFER TO PI-82 (28A811t1), DATA cw.ECTICl4 11ESCRIPTICl4 CODE UBER: TP-6. 1 LABELS ~TI~ AIDS SURVEY 119M(S: DS-2J WI> LABELS POSIT LABELS H N'.IT IN INV FILE t H N'.IT IN INV FILE I SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII 07/11/85

• *
• HIJMH OOIIEERINS DISCREPAN'.:Y REPORT 02./28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CO~ B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai1146 lrt:ORRECT l.ABEU.INi KJIAN ERROlh DRfE1. W.:USION c:AUSIN6 DELAY /ERROR IN Ill RESPCNE. H+ PflB.EN DESCRIPTION:

II -6 COO'AlltlENT SIJI) LEVEL INDir.ATORS IOTH LABELLED LI-RS-251A. Cit£ IS Il'il!RRECT, SHCl.lD BE LI -RS-2518 0718 PARAGRAPH rtlf!BER: 6.6.1.1 SlmSTED BAC1<F IT: RELABEL B D8fEL AS LI-RS-2518 H+ DISPOSITICJI: REFER TO LABELIN6 STUDY. PI-82 (28Aell01l

• DATA cw..ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION ~AKS: Vl-t I TENS ltMl. ~Ih MAK !UBER LOCATICJI aJIIR>>ENT NAfE SYSTEM Ll-RS-251A COO'AltfENT RECIRCt.lATIN6 SPRAY SYSTEM SUBSYSTEl!I 07/11/85
• *
• tlllAN EN6Ir£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY LWIT2 CODE A 82/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22All147 USE CF TEJlllORARY LABELS IS NOT ADNINISTRATIYELY CCfflRW.ED, IUIAN ERIIOlh POOR DESCRIPTIVE IIJRDINS AND USE CF POOR ADt£5IYE COW) CAUS E ERROR IN INTERPRETATICW AND DElAY IN RESPOEE, Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~:

NOD II -5 LACK CF PROCEDURES ENCOJRA6E POOR P~TICE IN LABEL.LINS (I, E,, ~y SORT OF TAPE AND J(JTATI

• cm..D SlFFICE>.

1718 PARAGRAPH NJIIIBER: 6.6.5,2,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: WRITE ADflINISTIIATIYE PROCEDURES CON:ERNIN6 IDPORARY LABELLIN6, Hf DISPOSITICl4: USE AND PUK:El£NT CF TEMPORARY LABELIN6 IS COVER£D BY A STANDING ORDER, ENSURE E rt=ORCSENT CF STANDIN6 ~R

• DATA COI.LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE fOIBER: TP-6,l LABELS AND LOCATICW AIDS SURVEY ~RKS: C-23 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM AllflIN PROC ff NlT IN INV FILE t / 81/38/86

• *
• tUAI ENGINEERING DISCREPArCY REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY IJ'1T2 CO~ B A$ESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPl)EIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai1149 I~TELY LABELLED PROCESS ~TRCll.ERS IUIAN ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATI!>>i CF ~VE POSITION.

PLOCING VALVE IN W~ 6 POSITI!h ,; Ht PROll£N DESCRIPTION: ENS ILL PROCESS CONTRW.£RS DO t()T POSITION INDICATION LABELS SU(}t AS *o* AND *c*. tff uae~OBER: 6.6.1.1 6.6.3.8.B S006ESTED ~IT: REaJliEND PlXING PERIIR£NT POSITION LABELS 000 PROCESSCONTROI.LERS. DISPOSITICW: REFER TO PI-82 (28AIU8U. Sl.66EST ADDING CLOSE-oPEN LABELIIE (SEE F-1 ON HED RE PORT>

• DATA COU£CTION DESCRIPTI!>>i AND CODE FOIIER: TP-6,1 LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ~S: DS-24 ITEJIIS INY(l \01 ~RK UIIER LOCATic>>I COMPIKNT r9E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 II -6 87/11/85
• *
• ltJfllN EN6INEERUE DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CO~ A ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW l£D NCI TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE
• 22All 158 Ml TBIIORARY LABEL REVIEW. tUIAN ERlllR: IIELAYED/Ir<<:ORIIECT DECISIIJE.

IP., IU6HT ACCIDENTIUY ASSOCIAT EA LAIIEl. WITH A cn.TR<l./DISPLAY lffN 1£ !HlUlN 1 T. ttt PROJl£N DESCRIPTIIII: Ill REVIEW PROC FOR IDP LABELS. .iA6f£TIC LBLS SETIMl!S LEFT LYIN6 ARCN.Nl OH CBS. 87N PARA6RMi NJIBER: 6.6.5.2.B Sl&ESTED BACKFIT: II -5 ESTAB ADIIIN PROC FOR REVIEWIN6 TEJIP LBLS. ESTAB POLICY TO ENSURE OPS R9KJIIE UNNECESS MAStE TIC L1l.S/TA6S FRCM CBS ttt DISPOSITIOH: REFER TO C-23 (22Al1147)

• DATA auECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-6.1 LABELS IWD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM BB SEC 2-1 ff NJT IN INV FILE t 17/11/85
• ~N ENBINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT 2 CODE A 83/17/86 ASSESS!'IENT LAST REVIEW l£D I() TITLE RESPC>>6IBILITY STATUS DATE 22Aell51 MEANINGS IF A FEW IOH.E6END INDICATOR LIGtlTS ARE r<<JT APPARENT.

II -5 83/17/86 KKlN ERROR: ,iISINTERPRETATION IF fESSOOE. Ir<<:ORRECT RESPONSE. _.. PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION: ~ING IF LISHTS ARE r<<JT IMEDIATaY APPARENT AND NO LABELS ARE US£D TO IDENTIFY THEIR NE ANIN6 HN LIT. 1780 PARAGRAPH fUIBER: 6.5.3.2.A, l Sl.&STED BACl<FIT: li>D LABELS TO IDENTIFY ~IN6S INTENDED BY LISHTS WHEN LIT. _.. DISPOSITION: INSTALL CORRECT LENSES AS REUUIRED *

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-5. 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRl<S: DS-Je-2 I IDIS INVOL \/ED: 2-FW-P-JA 2-Fw-P-38 AJX &lJTilWN PNL PRZ Ill HTR A PRZ Ill HTR E
• LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAP!E AAB215 fETER MA216 IIIETER ff t<<:JT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<:JT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<:JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM FEEDWATER SYSTEM FEEDWATER SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII
• *
• H..lMAH ENGINEERING DISCREPAta' REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE C ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai1213 LHECESSARY CONTROLS/DISPLAYS ON CONTID. PAtELS, ti.MN ERROR: DELAY IN READING DISPLAYS, LOCATING CONTROLS.

saECTION OR W !DE CONTID. *. READING WRONG DISPUlY, fH PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION: ENS III-9 CONTR(l.S/DISPLAYS LISTED ABOVE ARE UNNECESSARY OR AA£ NJT USED AND Sl-0.lD .B£ REl<<lVED 0A RE LOCATED. 8780 PARAGRAPH rtlfllBER: 6.S.1.1,C 6.4.1,1,B.l SUGGESTED BACKF IT: EOVE OR RELOCATE ~L I..NrECESSARY CONTROLS/DISPLAYS IN Tl£ CR. DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-60 (2@A03345) AND FOR CHART RCRDR FOR SYSTEJIFREIIJOCY SEE PI-187 (28 001103)

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4. l CONTROLS SURVEY REl'oARKS:

P *. 9.2-10 ITEMS INVOI.. VED: ~AK tUIBER LOCATION CIJIPOtelT NAIE Al'IERTAP SYS AUTO SYtOi BA TIN< CK.. WTR SWS CHLO CC PP CONTS/DISPLS CST LYL CTRL DISC WI: PAii! EXT sn, DRN FLASH EVAPS 6N FIELD 6RD ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff f(IT IN INV FILE 1 ff NlT IN INV FILE 1 ff f(IT IN INV FILE* H NlT IN IPN FILE t ff f(IT IN INV FILE f ff NlT IN IPN FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f ff NlT IN IPN FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NlT IN IPN FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII "6/07/85

• *
• HED NO: 22All213 ITEJIIS I NVCl. VED: MRK rtJMBER LOCATION C(]tlJ(JENT NAIE EH6Ir£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 SYSIDI 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEM

---

---

te . REC(IIIBS LOAD FREQ CT LW r.AT REDIB NIS PWR 11115111 PMP Ai\lP MTRS PT l.NlTH ROD ROD CTRL LTS S6 CHEJIIISTRY SYS FREQ RCR TURB AUTO ST TURB SUPERVR WASTE EVAPS ff NOT IN INV FILE* HNOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE

• ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NH IN INV FILE
• ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE*
• *
• HIJfllAN ENSINEERIN6 D1SCREPAt£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE ,. ' 12/28/86 ASSESSMENT l.AST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al1218 INSI.FFICIENT DISTIN6UI~ILITY BETIEEN LEGEND LTS LEGEND PBS. 11M ERROR: J INCREAS£D TRAINING TUE. ERROR/DELAY IN IP RESPOEE. Hf PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:

Ctl!Pl.T ILLUNINATED LESEND INDICATOR LI6HTS ARE t()T EASILY DISTINGUISHED FROil LESEND PUSHBUTTONS. 8780 PARAGRAPH NU!BER: 6.5.3.3.C SL66ESTED BACKFIT: A.OPLY SOfl.E FORM OF CODINS TO t£LP D1STIN6UISH PUSHBUTTONS FROM INDICATOR LISHTS. DISPOSITION: DELETE-DSP IELL-TRAINED/EXPERIENCED ON TURBINE PNLS. AREl<HOUD6ABlE AS TO WHICH ARE PBS

• DATA COLl.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REfllARKS:

DS~ ITEMS INVCl. VED: MRK NJIIIBER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAE a£ TURB CTR SUPERY PANEL ff r<<JT IN !NY FILE f H MJT IN INY FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM I 87/11/85

• *
• ttJMN OOINEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSES9£NT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al1213 I~TE ~TRCl.-DISPLAY INTEGRATI~

1t.R ERROR: It<<:ORRECT RE~ Hf PROJl.91 D*SCRIPTI0N: ENG II -7 j CONTRn.. POSITION SE11.1£fa DOES MJT C01'FOl!III TO DISPLAY SEIHN:E <TlllMB ROTARIES W/ roH.E6E ND INDICATORS! 87N PARAGRAPH ttll!BER: 6.9.1.2.c.2 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: RELAB8../REWIRE SWITCES IN ORDER TO eoti=08" TO PROPER CONTROL-DISPLAY INTEGRATION. ... DISPOSITION: REFER TO VD-15-2 (23Ai32lll

• DATA Ctl.1.ECTI~

DESCRIPTION ANO CODE OBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RBIARKS: .DS-15 I IDIS INVCl.VED: flARK NUMBER UJCATI~ CQ!lllONENT NA,£ THOOl ROTARS H "1T IN INV FIL£* SYSTQ SUBSYSTEM 17 /11/85

• *
• ENSINEERING DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 12/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A81381 INClHiIST IEANIN;/APPLICATIOO CF CO...OR CODIIE WITHIN/AIOE SYSTEMS tUIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IP RESP!HiE.

Hf PROBLal DESCRIPTIIJ4: ENS II -7 RED/AMBER NJT RESERVED FOR SPEC!~ ~IC. IEANIN6 CF COLORS kOT SAi£ WITHlN/AIOE SYSTEMS il780 PARAGRAPH N>>IBER: 6.5.1.6.C.2 6.4.2.2.F.1 6.5.1.6,D.3 6.5.1.6,D, 1 51.mSTED ~IT: REPLACE INCONSISTENTLY COLOR CODED LISI-ITS WITH LIGHTS WHICH CONFORM TO APPROVED CODING CON VENT ION. DISPOSITION: REFER TO L.ABa.IIE STUDY PER PI-82 (20A0111)1) TO ENSURE POSITION DESCRIPTIONS AND LISHT IEANINGS ARE CORRECTLY LABELED

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fUIBER: TP-8, l CON'vENTIONS SURVEY TP-3,1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEfilS REVIEW TP-4, 1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-5.l DISPLAYS.

SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATI!l'4 AIDS SURVEY TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION VALIDATION REMARKS: 8.1-1. DIS?: L.AB8.1Pti ~SO TO BE IIJDIFIED. IIDIS INV!l.~D: -~RK ruBER LOCATION CIJl){)ENT NAflE t£Y-2244 HCV-2389 LCV-2115A TCV-2143 F/¥!127 DISCRETE ROTARY FAA126 DISCRETE ROTARY DAA126 PROCESS ~AW.ER EM127 DISCRETE ROTARY SYSTEM C1£1111Cll. AND Y!l.LJ£ CONTRCl. SYSTEM Q£IIIIC1l. AND \JOLLIE CONTRCl. SYSTEM 0£JIIICA AND VOUJE CONTRCl. SYSTEM DEIICAL AND IJOLIJE cnrnn SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 92/14/86

• *
• HUPIAN EN6INEERI1E DISCRE.PAtCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE 8 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t(] TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE W.1382 LIST IF ABBREVIATIIJE/ACRONYIIIS/TEf!IIIS NOT AIIMIN ~TRCllED, tOAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OP RESP[M;E.

H-1 PRO!l.EM DESCRIPTI~: NOD I -4 ABBREVATIIHi c>>I JDIRD INCOOSISTENT W/ LIST IF ABBREV/OCRON/TERIIIS, I.E. OFTEN 2 ABBREV EXIS T FOR 1 WRD, 87il0 PARAGRAPH ru.BfR: 6,6, 3.3. A SU66ESTED 8ACKF IT: REWRITE LIST OF ABBREV/OCRON TO INCLUDE lU ABBREVIATIONJSED fN LABELS, AArU£IATORS, LESE NOS. l+f DISPOSITION: CORRECT AS PER BACKFIT

• DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NI.MIER: TP-8, l -CONVENTIONS SURVEY REJIIARKS: 8.1-2 I TEJIIS INVCl. VED: ~RK NlJIIIBER LOCATlc>>I C(M)(JfENT NAME LIST H t(]T IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM V/6/87/85

• *
• HED r<<l TITLE ttJA EN6Il'£ERIN3 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE A 22A81383 NtN:IATOR ABBREVIATIONS INCONSISTOCY.

IUIAN ERROR: ~Y/ERROR IN (II RESP<N,E. fff PROaEJII DESCRIPTI~: 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 II -5 16/17/85 IWUCIATOR ABBREVIATIONS ARE f()T COt6ISTENT WITH nm USED ELS8f£RE IN CR. 0701 PAROORAPH OBER: 6. 3. 3. 4. D S006ESTED ~IT: EVAUJATE FEASIBILITY IF REENSRAVINJ ANN.Hi TO IIIAINTAIN CONSISTENCY WITH REST CF CR. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO ANfU£IATOR STUDY PER PI-85 (20A02106)

• DATA Cll..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY RBIARKS: 8.-1-3 ITEMS INVOCVED:

MAK l'UIBER LOCATION COIIPONENT NAIE ABBREV ff NlT IN !ff.I FILE 1 SYSTBI SUBSYSTEM

• *
• tC.R EtEINEERitiS DISCRE11At£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 COM: A .82/28/96

~T LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A81~ DISTitCTIVE ~T TE~Ill.ES ARE t<<JT USED FOR BIERS ~TRll.S IUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN LOCATil'E CORRECT Cl)fTRll. IN EJ11£RSOCY SITUATION. HI P~ DESCRIPTION: ENS Ir<<:OOISTENT COLOR SHADirt3/StM CODirt3 USED IN SAFETY RELATED SYSTOO. UN PARAGRAPH NIJIIBER: 6.8.1,3.D SIJ36ESTED BACKFIT: II -5 PROVIDE EACH EMERS CTR!.. W/ DISTIICTIVE EMRCEIENT SUCH AS RED LABELL.lrt3, CONTRB.. OR 6UARD HI DISPOSITION: LABELING WILL BE CONSIDERED IN !CB RELABELING STUDY, PER PI-82 (28A81101), DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIIBER: TP-8. l CONVENTIONS SURVEY RENARKS: 8.1-4 IIDIS INW.VED: NARK M.JIIIB£R LOCATION COf!POrENT rM: TECHNIOOES ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* SYSTEJII SUBSYSTBI 81/38/86 i ! * *

• HUfllN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 92/28/86 A$ESS1ENT LAST REVIEW HED l<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22AfU386 Ir<<:ONSISTENT IEANINS/~ICATION CF ctl.OR CODIN6 WITHIN/MJNG SYS It.A ERROR: llELAY/ERROR IN IP RE~ Hf PROll.91 DESCRIPTION:

ENS II -7 RED/AIGIER r(JT RESERVED FOR SPECill. APPi.IC. IEANING CF aLORS NJT SAIE WITHIN/~ SYSTEMS fff 87N PARA6fH¥ltl ttiMBER: 6. S. 1. 6. C. 2 6. 4. 2. 2. F. 1 6, S. 1, 6. D. 3 6. S. 1, 6, D, 1 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: REPLACE: INCOOISTENTLY COLOR CODED LIGHTS WITH LISHTS WHICH CorEORPI TO APPROVED CODING CON VENTI!lE. DISPOSITION: LI6HTS WILL BE LAB£L£D AS TO THEIR l£ANIN6S. REFER TO LABEL STUDY PER PI-82 (29A 01101), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIB£R: TP-8,1 cnNENTIONS SURVEY TP-3,1 ANttJNICIATOR SYSTEl'IS REVIEW TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY TP-S,l .DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6,1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION ~~S: 8. 1-1. ITEMS INYO.. VED: NARK rtJMBER LOCATI~ COIPOfENT t<AE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM EHC TURB VLT H NJT IN INV FILE* / 11/31/86

• *
• tUIW EN6It£ERIN6 DISC~ REPORT SURRY UNJT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A81317 INC(N;IST ll£ANIN6/APPLICATI1l4 CF CO..OR CODIN, WITHIN/AIDE SYS1BIS II -7 11M ERROR: DEUIY/ERROR IN OP RESPCMiE.

/ Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTII*: RED/AMBER NOT RESERVED FOR S;)ECill. APPL.IC. IEANING OF COLORS NOT SAPE WITHIN/AIDE SYSTEMS 87N PARAGRAPH MJJIBER: 6.5.1.6.C.2 6,4,2.2.F.f 6.5.1,6.D.3 6,5,1.6,D.1 Sl&iESTED BACKFIT: REPIXE INCONSISTENTLY C!JLOR CODED LISHTS WITH LOI6HTS liiICH CON=ORM TO APPROVED CODIN6 CO NYENTI~ '** DISPOSITI~: Et4ER6 DIESEL SEN t2 Po-lER fl!ONITDR LT TO BE DfMiED FRIJII RED TO WHITE

• DATA C!l.LECTION DESCRIPT:114 AND CODE NUIBER: TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS

.URVEY TP-3,1 ~ICIATOR SYSTBIS REVIEW TP-4.1 CONTROLS SIJ':VEY TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SUlVEY TP-6,1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIF.CATifJ4 AND VALIDATI~

~Rl<S: 8.1-1 I TEJIIS I NVOl VED: MRK rtJIIIBER LOCA Tlll4 COIIPONENT NAfE EDG PWR !ION ff NOT IN IrN FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 96/87/85

• *
• tUIAN EN6INEERIMi DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al1388 O.SIST IIIBININ6/APPLICATION IF ca.OR CODING WITHIN/AIOti SYSTEMS ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN IJ) RESPaEE. fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION:

ENS I -1 RED/All!BER f()T RESERVED FOR SPECI/l. ~IC, IEANIMi OF COLORS f()T SAi£ WITHIN/~ SYSTEMS 8708 PARAGRAPH rtJMBER: 6,5,1,6,C.2 6.4.2.2.F.1 6.5.1,6,D,3 6.5.1.6.D, 1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: JNCOOISTENTLY COLOR COD8l LIGHTS WITH LIGHTS WHICH CONFORfl TO APPROVED CODIMi CON VENTIIJ4S. Hf DISPOSITION: R80VE t£AT TRACING LIGHTS FRQIII CONTROL ROOt COORDI~TE WITH Pl-187 (281183), DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJMBER: TP-8, 1 CIJMNTIONS SURVEY TP-3.1 Arfi.lNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW TP-1+.1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6. 1 LABELS LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION RE.IIARKS: 8.1-1 ITEP!S INYO.. VED: * ~RI< NOO!£R LOCATION ~T NAfE FLOOD CNTRL t£AT TRACINS ff NJT IN INV FILE f ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII 11/11/85

• *
• ttM OOINEERINS DISCREPAfO' R£PORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSPENT LAST REVIEW HED I'll TITLE RESPONSIBILITY.

STATUS DATE 22Al1389 ILLCEICR. AR~TS IF aMROLS AND DISPLAYS. t()NE . IUIAN ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATI~ IF VALVE POSITION. It<<:REASED SEARCH TJIIIE, IraEASED REI.IKE I:.. l80RY. fff PROBLEM IIESCRIPTI~: fff REHTR CTRL SYS LES IND LTS fVVtl/2/3/4) <BB SECT 2-2> HAYE CLOSB> ABOVE OPEN IND (NOT CONS ISTENT W/ CCJNENTIONSI 0790 PARAGRAPH ttJIIIBER: 6.8.2.2.A SU66ESTED BACKF IT: REWIRE AND RE-EM3RAVE ALL FOUR LEsa.D INDICATOR LIGHTS SO TtflT OPEN INDICATOR IS ABOVE CLO SED INDICATOR. DISPOSITION: DELETE~TIOJSH POSITlCWS ARE INCORRECT, TH£ CLOSB> Ll6HTS ARE GREEN, OPEN ARE R ED

• DATA COU.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl.JIIIBER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY REJIIARl<S: DS-27-1 ITEMS INVCl.. VED: IIARI< OBER LOCATION O)l)()NENT fM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RHTR CTRL SY ff t(JT IN IW FILE f 87/11/85

• *
• HED NO TITLE KM ENSINEEIUrE DISCAEPfM:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CO~ B 22A8131i ILLOOI!A ARRANSEMENTS C>>= Cll4TRCX.S AND DISPLAYS.

tUIAN ERROR: ,usINTERPRETATION C>>= VAL.VE POSITION. IN:REASED SEARCH THIE. INCREASED RELIIKE ON IEIORY, fH PROIUJII DESCRIPTION: 82/28/86 ~T LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS .DATE ENS II -7 87/11/85 SOtE NJT IN IU>lfU!ETIC ORDER, OTl£RS 1 A 1 LOCATED TO Tl£ RI6HT OF 8. 0708 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.8.2.2.A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: SWITCH LOCS SO A IS LEFT AND B IS PUDDLE AND C IS R1SHT. t-lf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-19 !22!=23826) !VENT PANEL> AND PI-117-3 !29803816), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJ111BER1 TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-8.1 CCNVENTIONS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-27-2 I TENS INVCl. VED: ~RI< ttJIIIBER LOCATION CD,llONENT rM 1-YS-E-4A 1-YS-E-48 ~-YS-fl183A l-YS-fl1038 l-YS-fl183C 1-YS-flliJD 1-VS-P-lA

• l-YS-P-18 1-YS-P-2A l-YS-P-28 2-YS-F-lA QAA847 GAA845 XA48 XBAe46 XABM6 XABl47 RAA047 RAAi45 RBA047 RBA045 NAA846 DISCRETE ROTARY LI6HT LISHT LISHT LIGHT LISHT LI91T LIGHT L1SHT LIGHT DISCRETE ROTARY SYSTEM VENTILATION SYSTEM VENTILATic>>I SYSTEM VENTILATION SYST01 VENTILATic>>I SYSTEJII VENTILATION SYSTEM VENTILATION SYSTEJII VENTILATION SYSTEM VENTILATION SYSTEJII VENTILATION SYSTEM VENTILATION SYSTEJII, VENTILATION SYSTEM / SUBSYSTEM
• *
• t£D r<<J: 22Al 1311 ITEJ!IS INVO..VED:

KM EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 MRK NUflBER LOCATION CQIIIQENT r9IE SYSIDI 2-YS-F-1B 2-YS-F-lC 111JV1-P6-117A IIIV1-P6-1a7B NAA045 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATitw SYSTEM NAB845 DISCRETE ROTARY VENTILATICW SYSTBI. ff "1T IN INV FILE

• ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t 82/28/86 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• ttJIIIAH ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPAra' REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A81783 'A JE INADYERTENTLY CLOSED. CDR.T MM ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

<If!IPRCPER VALVE Lil'ELIP>. Hf PROa.EN DESCRIPTION: 2-cH-226 WAS INADVERTENTLY CLOSED MKIN6 M OF 00 BORIC ~ID FL~ PATHS TO THE CORE Ira> ERABL.E. 8788 PARAGRAPH NU!l!BER: 6.1.1.1.A SU66ESTED BACKF IT: ENSURE Al)tlfIN CTRLS IN PUCE. Ell'HASIZf THE IfllPCIRTANCE OFF1ll0WIN6 PROCEDURES TO PERSONNEL. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-NOT IN CRDR SCCJ>E, PERHAPS LABaIN6 RECOfllllENDATIONS FOR !CR WILL BE CONSI DERED FOR IIIIPl.9IENTATIOH Lem.LY ~TA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION CODE NUJIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATI~ ~RKS: . HR-IS. WRITTEN FRCJIII :...ER-81-001/eJl..--0 IT£111S I NVll. lJED 1 ~RK NUflBER LOCATION COl!PONENT rM: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H r(JT IN INV FILE 1 ! 17/11/85

• *
• Ht.A EN6IN£ERI~

DISCREPA,JCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED Ml TITLE RESPOEIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A817M OVERFILL CF "B" SAFETY INJECTI()I ACCUUATOR. H.A ERROR: ERROR IN OP RESPCIEE. / I fff PROBL.£111 DESCRIPTI()I: CR IP£RATOR INADVERTENTLY FILLED THE "B" ACClJOJlTOR

1. 7'/. ABOVE MXIIUI. fff 0700 PARAGRAPH Nli'BER: 6.3.1.2.A.2 St.66ESTED BACKFIT: ~UATE ALAR,! FUtCTION.

DISPOSITION: ZONE MRKINSS TO BE ADD8> TO MTRS LI-0-920/922/924/926/928/938 TO AID OP IN DET ERl!IININ6 ACrul LVLS. IREJIIARKSl DATA COl..1.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJMBER: TP-3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSTE,!S REVIEW RtMRKS: HR-5, WRITTEN F~ LER-82-031/0.-fl. SEE E-7 (21A02229l. I IDIS INVOLVED: MRI< tOIBER LOCATION IDPOfENT NA,£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM H f(JT IN INV FILE* I -2 87/11/85

• *
• tlJIIIAH EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY LtHT2 CODE ASSESSfENT UIST REYIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82822 ~TER STYLE USED~ DISPLAYS t<<lT CIJEISTENT.

KM ERROR: DELAY IN CP REsmEE. fff PROa.91 DESCAIPTI~: STYLE N'.IT COOISTENT -LllER CASE LETIERINS. 1711 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6. 5. 1. 3. B. 2 6. 5. 3. 3. B, 2 SOOGESTED BACKF IT: CORRECT Cl4!RACTER STYLE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER DISPLAYS. ... DISPOSITION: DEL£TE -DISPS EASILY REAl>-LETIERIN6 LARGE & Cl.EAR. l'<<l PROBWI W/ LESIBILITY, LO W CASE APPRCP FOR ~IT ABBREVS. DATA cru.£CTION De:SCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJMBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: JP-3. (AU. METERS IN RAD MON CABS IIENTIClfED,) IT91S INYCl ',{I): . JIIARK NUMBER LOCATI~ COMPOr.ENT ff>>£ RAD IIJN 1-2 RAD O 2-1 llAD O 2-2 RADO C(Jf4 RI RMS 127 8 RI RJIIS 128 P RI RMS 22.7 0 RI RfllS 228 P ff f(IT IN INV FILE t ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t ff l(JT IN INYFILE t ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t ff NlT IN INV FILE t ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t ff NlT -IN INY FILE t ff t<<IT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CIJIA.T 17/15/85

• *
• lt.JIIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCRE~Y REPORT SURRY IT 2 alllE B 93/17 /86 ASSES5'1ENT LAST REVIEW HED N'.I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A02823 IIAJOR i:wD ll!INOR 6RADOOTIONS KM ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IJ> RESPCHlE.

Hf PROB1.B1 DESCRIPTION: NOD II -6 PruOR iwD l!Ir()R GRADUATIOO SHCll.D BE USED IF IJ> TO FOUR GRADUATIONS BETWEEN N.JIERALS ON S al.E. 17S0 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6.5.1.5.A.2

6. 5. 4.1. C SUG6ESTED BACl<FIT:

alRRECT OR ADD THE ll!AJOR AND l!Ir()R 6RADUATIONS WHERE NECESSARY. DISPOSITiON: ADD INTERMEDIATE GRADUATION (HEAVIER LIN£) FOR EACH VALUE OF 10

• DATA CfUECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY ~Rl<S: JP-8. ITEIIS INVCk.. VED: PI-lllt-i?elA Pl-l,-_281B LOCATION COPIPONENT LAA310 IETER LAB311 IETER SYSTEJII LEAl<ASE l!0NITORIN6 SYSTEM 1.EAKA6E l()NITORINS SYSTEII SUBSYSTEPI 85/82/85
• *
• H!Jf!AN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT 2 CODEC 83/26/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A02024 MJ, INTERl'I; "IN BRADS SHOULD BE USED IF ll!ORE TH,:W 5 BRADS BET NOS NOD II -7 HUMAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OP.RESPONSE.
  • • PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:

MJ, INTERM, l'IINOR BRADUATIONS NOT USED WHEN THERE ARE FIVE BRADUATIONS BETWEEN NUMERALS.

• • • 0700 PARAGRAPH NUl!IBER:

6.5.1,5,A.3 6.5.4.1,C SU66ESTED BACKFIT: ADD NINOR, INTERFIEDIATE OR f!IAJOR BRADUATIONS WHERE NECESSARY. DISPOSITION: REDESIGN AND REPLACE SCALES OF LISTED PUMP A,IMETERS TO IMPROOVE READABILITY. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl!IBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REPIARKS: JP-9 ITEl'IS INVOLVED: fllARK NUPIBER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAl'IE SYSTEM ------AAAl 13 METER BEARING COOI..INS NON-RADIOACTIVE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CHEMICAi. AND VOLUIE CONTROL SYSTEM ~RGINS 03/26/86 2-BC-P-lA 2-cti-P-lC 2-FW-P-3A FAA125 DISCRETE ROTARY AAB215 . METER FEEDWATER SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD

• *
• HED NO TITLE EM3INEERIN6 DISCREPiKY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22A82825 l,qUES INDICATED BY ~IT 6RADLVnI!l4S.

1-tM ERROR: D£LAY/ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. H4 PROBLEN DESCRIPTI~: 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -6 e5/12/85 VALLES INDICATED BY ~IT GRADUATIONS DO t(JT PROORESS BY 1,2,s,10 OR nm VIUES IU..TIPLIE D BY !DE PIJER OF 10.. 07110 PARASRAPH NUflBER: 6.5.1.5.A.3 6.5.4.l,C SUSGESTED BACl<F IT: CORRECT VALUES OF UNIT GRADUATIONS TO PROORESS TO 1,2,5,10 OR THOSE VALLES MULTIPLIED BYS CME ~R OF 10. DISP0SITic>>4: REDESIGN AND REPLACE SCALES TO IPIPROVE READABILITY

• DATA ctUECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY Rf/4A~S: JP-10 ITEMS !NW.UED: MRK ~UIBER LOCATION COOINENT NAIE SYSTEI, FI-205A OBB310 IIIETER SERVICE WATER SYSTEM FI-28SB 008311 METER SERVICE WATER SYSIDI Fl-CC-204A NM315 METER CIJIIIP()£HT COO.INS SYSTEM FI-CC-21.\B

~15 METER CO!PC>>ENT COO.IN, SYSTEM FI-CC-2MC PAA315 METER COMPOt£NT COO.INS SYSTEM FI-CC-289 OOA423 METER CCJUlOt£NT COO.IN, SYSIDI FI-CC-216 NAA425 PIETER COl'Cl£NT COO.ING SYSIDI FI-FW-298A ff l()T IN :NV FILE 1 Fi-FIH!00B ff t(JT IN :NV FILE 1 FI-FW-2N: ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 FI-VS-118 H f()T IN .lfJ FILE 1 SUBSYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD REACTOR COOt..ANT PlJlll)S REACTOR coo.ANT PIJIPS REACTOR coo...ANT PUMPS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD

• * * !lJflAH EN6INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82t26 POINTER TIPS !Hll.D BE SIJlllLE, ttM ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

fff PROBI..EII DESCRIPTION: COO..T / POINTER TIPS StO..lD BE SELECTED TO MIN1'1IZE COfC8UIENT CF SCU: 6RADUATION MARKS OR NJIIER ll.S. fff 1780 PARA6RMi ttlfl!B*R: 6~5.2.2.A.2 SU6GESTED BACKFIT: REP!...AC£ WITH Sill>LE POINTER TRIPS COM=ORPHNG WITH 0700 6UID*LINES. DISPOSITION: DEL£TE-5DUS EASILY READ, EGUIP BEEN REIIOYED FRI>>! CB. NR-246/247 POINTERS COYE R UBERS, I REMARKS> DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION CODE tOIBER: TP-5.1 DISPI..AYS SURVEY fel:IRKS: JP-13. DISP: BUT RCRDRS ARE US8) FOR HISTORI~ DATA CK.Y. IIDIS INYll. VED: MARK IUBE:R LOCATION CO!POIENT '9IE SYSTEM CR-5520i CR-BS211 NR-246 NR-247 RAD JION CQIIIN RR-150 RR-2ee RR-251 TS Ul2 LOAD TR BR 129 TR-2448 ff f()T IN INV FIL.£ t ff NlT IN INV FIL.£ t / ff NlT IN INV FIL.£ t ff hOT IN INV FIL.£

• ff f()T IN INV FIL.£ * . OM732 RECORDER RADIATION IOHTORitE SYSTEM OM712 RECORDER RADIATION MJNITORINS SYSTEM OAA762 RECORDER SERVICE WATER SYSIDI ff f()T IN INV FILE* ff hOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE t SUBSYST01 17/1S/85
• *
• HED t<<:l: 22A82926 ITEMS INVCl. VED: IIARK ru.BER LOCATil:i.

COIP.lENT HlM EN6INEERit.6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 SYSIDI WST DISP PN1. H t()T IN INY FILE* 82/28/86 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HED t(} TITLE tlM ENiINEERING DISCREPAhCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 2.2A02827 INDICATICN NEEDED IN ~Rll. RCDI. IUAI ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN CP RESPtWSE.

Hf PROll.EM IIESCRIPTICN: INDICATIONS LISTED ARE r££DED IN CONTRB.. RCDI. 0700 PARASRMi UBER: 6.5.1.1.B Sl66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE INDICATIONS NEEDED BY CPS TO THE ct){TRCl. .BOARD, Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-n <20A02005> COVERED IN PREVIOOS HED

• DATA Cll.LECTICN DESCRIPTICN AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VE:RIFICATIOH AND Wl.IDATION REJIIARKS:

P.9.2-9 IIDIS INIJCl.VED 1 !!ARK tUIBER LOCATION C!lMP(}f£NT NAME BR COO.. HD CMPT APR.OOS CRTS EXC LTu. FLO FD RES BY FL FF LCM PWR IMDRE TIC INDICATICN lf4 LUB OIL T

• Sn! EFFLU NR S6 LV RCR ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff OOT IN INV FILE 1 ff OOT IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE f ff OOT IN INV FILE 1 ff OOT IN INV FILE t ff l'()T IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE t ff l'()T IN INV FI LE t SYSTEJII 02/28/86 ASSESSJIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -6 V/6/07/85 SUBSYSIDI
• *
• EN6INEERIN6 DIS::REMt<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 ITE,5 INYCLYED:

MRI< NJIIIBER LOCATI~ C()IP()ENT NAfE SYSIDI RX VSL LVL STM FLCM ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t 12/28/86 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HlJMN EN6INEERIN6 D1SCR£PAICV REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW HED r<<) TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~8 RElllJOWT Atft.lCIATORS RECORDERS.

tt.llAN ERAOR: DE~Y/ERROR IN CP RESPCMiE.

• Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:

TOO MANY REDUNDANT ANtK:IATORS, CONDl.£TIVITY RECORDERS l(JT NEED£D. 0700 PARASRM-i l'UIBER: G.5.1, 1,D SU36ESTED BACKFIT: REJIOVE ~T IMUCIATORS RECO!iDERS Tl4lT ARE NOTf£EO£D. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE~IATOR STUDY TO BE DOE: <Pl-85, 2eA02106) CONDUCTIVITY RECORDERS ARE NEEDED

• DATA cru..ECTION DESCRIPTION~

CDDE ll!MBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VAL:DATION ~Rl<S: P. 9. 2-11 IIDIS INVll. VED: ~RK l'OIBER LOCATION~- NAIi£ 2 CONDUC RCD At'IUCIATORS ff "1T l H INV FILE t ff r<<JT 'N INV FILE* SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CORT Vlfl/U/85

• *
• IUIAH ENSINEERINi DISCREPIM:Y R£PORT SURRY LWIT2 CODE*A 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPCH,IBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82929 DISPLAYS NJT LABELLED TO INDIC ffTHER ACTIR. ORDBRal STATUS, IUIAN ERROR: IIIISIHTERPRETATI~

OF DI!PLAYED INFORfllATIOH, fff PROlll9I DESCRIPTION: . N)I) II -5 U DISPLAYS r<<JT LABaL£D TO CLEARLY* INDICATE lf£THER Tl£ DISPLAYS IS OF ACTIA. OR DEMAND STATUS. 8710 PARAGRAPH NUIIIBER: 6.5. l. l.E. l SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: LABEL DISPLAYS INDICATI~ ltlETtER THE DISPLAY IS~ ACTIA. OR~ STATUS, fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-108 (2008111il4, 111116, 1187> DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE !UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Wl.lDATION RE!flRKSs P. 9. 2-12 ITENS INVCLIJED: MRi< NJIBER LOCATION COIPONENT rAIE u l£VS DISPLAYS RX TRIP 1DUT .ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t ff NJT IN INV FIL£ t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM t6/87/85 i I I

• *
• tUAI 8EINEERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE 82/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVI84 TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE r<<l POSITIVE INDICATil)I

~T INSTRIJIENTS f4IVE FAILED, 11.JAt ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATil)I Of DISPLAYED INFO. Hf PROllBI DESCRIPTI~: COR..T r<<JT ~WAYS POS INDIC Tl'AT IHSTRUM FAILED/.BECOE INOPERATIVE. IU PITAS 00 r<<JT FAIL OfF SCIU; SOME FAIL AS IS 87~ PARAGRAPH ~R: 6.S.1.1.F SU66*STED BIO<F IT: PROVIDE A POSITIVE INDICATION Tf41T AN INSTRUIOT HAS FAILED OR .BEOOE IrffiRATIVE. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-DPS TRAIN£D TO RECOONIZE FAILURE, fl!TRS RE.IXJHDANT.NOT LIKELY BOTH WILL FAI L. ON.. CHECKS EA SHIFT !RBIRKSl DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.JIU!ER: TP-9,2 \JERIFICATll)I IJALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: P.9.2-15-1. DISP: CHECKS ARE EA WEEK DURING SHUTDOWN IIDIS INVCl.VED: IIIARK NI.Jf!BER LOCATICJI CO!POrENT SYSTB! Nl-l-3SB Nl-l-368 NI-2-3SB NI-2-36B H t()T IN INV FILE f H r<<lT IN INV FILE t / FAB287 IETER NW.EAR IHSTRUl£NTATION SVSTB! FAC2e7 IETER t<<lEAR INSTRIJIENTATil)I SVSTEJII SUBSYSTEM 07/11/85

• *
• HED t<<J TITLE HUMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCIIEPAf(;Y REPORT SURRY LtHT2 CODE B 22A82831 DISPLAYS P<<JT PRECISE OR ACCURATE EtO.Qi, HJIAi ERROR: ERROR IN Cl>ERATOR RESPONSE * ._.. PRtlLEM DESCRIPTION:
• 02/28/86.

_*, . ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS I -2 V!61e11as DISPLAYS LISTED DO NJT PROI/IDE Tl£ PRECISION OR OCCURACY REQUIRED WHEN USINi THEM. e1ee PARASRAPH NlJIIIEER:

6. 5.1. 2. A St&iESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE SREATER PRECISION OR OCCURACY FOR Dis:tAYS.

._.. DISPOSITION: REFER TO HR-6 (22A05Nf>l. REPLACE SCIU DATA CO.J.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE l't.lMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATICIH REJIIARKS: P.9.2-16-1 ITEMS INVCk.VED: -MRK fUIBER LOCATION CQllllOr,ENT TI-c5:-281A TI-cs-2888 SYSTEM WITAirfENT SPRAY SYSTEM al4TAittENT SPRAY SYSTBI SUBSVSTEJII i ,1 I

• *
• HED t<<l TITLE IUIAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22A82132 DISPLAYS THAT REQUIRE SO£ FORM OF mNERSION.

tlM ERIIOR: ERIIOR IN INTERPRETING. DELAY /ERROR IN RESP(NE. fff PROllBI DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASS£SSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE t<<JD II -7 17/11/85 DISPLAYS LISTED REQUIRE SOIE FORM OF WNERSION IN ORDER TD EFFECTIVELY US£ INFOR!IIATION. 0711 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5.1,2,B SLG6ESTED 8":KFIT: ClilN6E SCIUS OR PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS FDR DISPLAYS REllJIRIN6 CONVERSIONS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-110 (~7, ET.AL.) DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-9, 2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATICIN REMARKS: P. 9.2-18-1 ITBIS INYCl. VED: IIIARK NUMBER LOCATION COfRJM:NT tM: MST BORON RCVRY COUJRIETRIC ECST FEED .FLCII RWST SI~ LVL STII FLIJ,l WIND DATA ff "1T IN INV FILE t ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE t ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE I ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE t ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff f(JT IN !NY FILE 1 SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM

• *
• tlM OOINEERIN6 DISCREAA'CY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE :ITLE 22Al2tJ3 DISPLAYS ~T IO..lD BE lf a=t.l IN smE. OTHER Vil.LIE, ttM ERROR: IUSINTERPREi ATI~ IF JISPLAYED INFO, l'IISREADIN6 Cf' DISPUlYS.

Hf PROBl8I DEstRiPTI~: 02/28/86 ASSESSMEHT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE COMPLT 06/97/85 DISPLAYS LISTED 1,()1.l.!) BE IIORE USEFUL IF INDICATED IN SOIE OTl£R VALUE. @700 PARA6'~ MMBER: 6.5.1. '!.C Sl.6GESTEJ BACKFIT: Df¥.'<<x SCIU TO PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS, .._ DISPOSITI~: DaETE-fLOW IN Cfll IS ,ORE DES1RABU

• C+lTA cru.ECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATIOO R9IAR1<S: P.9.2-19-1 IIDIS INVO..VED: ~RK NUMBER LOCATI!Ji COfllO£NT NAflE SYSTEII CTlfi VAC PP H NH IN INV FILE

• SUBSYSTEII
• *
• ttJA E.N6INEERIN6 DISCREPAM'.:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CODE .. ASSESSfENT I.AST REVIEW TITLE RESPtWSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82834 DISPS r<<>T ~TE IN RANGE, r<<>T Sl.JIPORTED BY AUX INSTRlJENTATI~.

tUIAN ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATICIN Of' DISPLAYED IN='O, IIISREADIN6 CF DISPlAY. lff PROll.9I DESCRIPTION:* roRT DISPLAYS f()T ADEOOATE IN TERMS Cf' RAN6E OR ARE f(IT SUPPORTED BY AUXILIARY lNSTRIJIIIENTATll>>t. fff 0708 PARAGRM-i NIJIBER: 6. 5.1. 2. D, 3 S006ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCUS/INSTRI.JENTATlClt. DISPOSITION: DEL£TE,-RAN6E ADEOOATE. 5aU 1-480, CN.Y USE MTR TO VERIFY THAT PRESSURES IS SRE ATER THAN 2N SO RCPS CAN I RMRKl MTA CCUECTICIN DESCRIPTION AND CODE N.>>IBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATICIN AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DI~'r'S SURVEY REMARKS: P.9.2-20-1, DlSP: BE STARTED I TEJIIS INYO.. 'JED: IIARK NUIIIBER LOCATION Cl)Jl()fENT NAME RCP s&. H f()T IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM '116/07/85

• *
• HED I'{) 22A02847 POOR DISPlAY DESIGN IU'.AN ERROR: READIIE ERRORS. PROBWI DESCRIPTION:

TITLE llJIIIAH ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 2 CODE B CORE COOLING OITOR VERTICALLY ORIENTED NJJERALS. 1700 PARAGRAPH MJMBER: 6.5.2.4 SOOGESTED BOCKFIT: 83/17/86 ASSESSfl!ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -£ 83/17/86 RE-ORIENT P<<..HERALS (SPACE-coNSTRAINEDl. RE-ORIENT DISPLAYS TO VERTICAL.. ... DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-29 (20A01136) ICC UPSRAD£ . DATA CCl.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.MBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: YI-42-1 I IDIS INYCk. YEO: LOCATION ~NT NAME SYSTEl!I CORE COOL H NJT IN INV FILE

• SUBSYSTEl'I
• *
• Hlll9I £N:iINEERIN6 DISCREPIKY SURRY ~IT2 CODE 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2t53 DISPLAYS NEEDED IN TI£ CCWTRtl ROOi!. ttJMAN ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATION er= DISPLAYED INFO. FmwRE TO DETECT ABtllR IR ClNITI CJ4S. " fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:

Ht DISPLAYS LISTED NEEDED IN CR. 0710 PARAGRAPH rtJJqlER: 6.1.1, l.A SUGGESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE DISPLAYS rEEDED BY !PS.. DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-77 (20A02N5), NOTE: RSWT CAT TAN< NR INDIC NOT PREVIOUSLY LISTED ON PI-77, ADDED FR()! PRESENT 1£D

• DATA co...LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUftBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION R£JIIARKS:

P.9.2-1. IT91S INV!l.. YED: IIARK IOBER LOCATION COfilPOfENT NAME OC PR IITR

• BEAR COO. HD CORE CCXL 11N CTIIT H2 DIFF PRESS PRZR PR NR PRZR SPRA W RCS BQRl)j RVLIS RWST CAT TK SEa:wDRY SYS ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r,JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff f()T IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE I ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEII SUBSYSTEM W!PLT 07/15/85 ..
• *
• ITEJIIS I NVCl. YED: tllfllAN 8EINEERIN6 DISCR£PANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 JIIARK NlJIIIBER LOCATION COfl>OfENT SYSTEM SEQ CF EVENT SHDN DRN VSL STII FLO STIP STRlP FD FLO TURB OIL BEA ff f()T IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff l<<JT IN INV FILE t ff MJT IN INV FILE t ff MJT IN INV FILE t 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• ltA OOINEERHE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE HED NO TITLE 22Al2l54 DISPLAYS r£EDED IN CR TO BRING PUWT TO SAFE SHU~. tUIAN ERROR: flISINTERPRETATION CF DISPLAYED INFORl'IATION, FAILURE TO DHEC T ABt<<llM. CONDITIIJ,IS.
• P~ DESCRIPTICW1 ASSESSlENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE COll>LT 87/15/85 !PS REPORTED THE DISPLAYS LISTED ARE NEEDED IN CR TO BRIMi ~T TO SAFE SltJTl)(liW, 0708 PARAGRAPH NlJIBER: 6.1.1. l, A SISiESTED 9'1CKFIT:

PROVIDE DISPUlYS r£EDtD BY CPS. *** DISPOSITION: ScE PI -77 (28A02805)

• DATA. ro.LECTION DESCRIPTICN Ir<<> CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~

~IDATION REl',ARKS: P.9.2-3 I TB1S INVCX. YEO: PIARI< NU~R UDHION COIP()ENT ,-FW FLO NR FW RES BY STND PIPE LV ff tfJT IN INV FILE t H t(IT IN INV FILE I ff f(JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

• *
• IIMlH EM;INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT. 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW . TITLE RESPOHSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2856 NO POSITIVE INDICATION THAT INSTRlllENTS FAILED, 11.R ERROR: flISINTERPRETATION OF. DISPLAYED INFO. tff PROl!l9I DESCRIPTION:

C(Jl)LT NJT ~vs POS INDIC T~T INSTfUI FAILED/.11£COfE It6'ERATIVE. ALL !HRS DO NJT FAIL OFF SCALE;, 50fE FAIL AS IS 871!0 PARAGRAPH rtJ!L!BER: 6.5.1. l.F SU66ESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE A POSITIVE INDICATION THAT~ INSTRlJENT FAILED OR 11£CO!E I~TIVE. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-NIT EXPECTED TO II£ SAIE, DIFFIOCS KEPT W/IN ACCEPTABLE RN6 BY ADfilIN CTRLS /PERIODIC 0£[:I( BY INSTRlll TECHS DATA cru.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M.JIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-5. 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: P *. 9 *. 2-15-2&5 ITEMS INVCl.VED: NARK rtlf!BER LOCATION IDflOfENT NAIi£ SYSTEJII TI-1-411B TI-l-412A TI-l-421B TI-i-422A TI-1-431B TI-1-4328 TI-2-411B TI-2-4128 TI-2-421B TI-2-422A TI-2-431B ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NJT IN INV FILE

• ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* LAC413 IIIETER REACTOR COCl.ANT <PRIMARY UXP, PWR> SYS LAA414 METER REACTOR COOJINT (PRIMARY Loo:>, PWRl SYS r<<413 METER REACTOR coo.ANT (PRiflARY LOOP, PWRl SYS NAB414 METER REACTOR CID.ANT !PRIMARY Loo:>, PWRl SYS OAC413 IIIETER REACTOR CCIIUWT (PRIMARY UXP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEM 16/87/85
• * -. t£D NO: ITEMS INVCLVED:

MRI< NJIIIBER LOCATION CCJIIIP!MNT TI-2-432B DAA41~ IETER 11M BEINEERil'f3 DISCREPKY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJI REACTOR coo.ANT !PRH!ARY LOOP, PWRl SYS ' -I

• *
• HED t<<l TITLE ENGINEERil'<<3 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 22At2857 t<<l POSITIVE INDICATI~

THAT INSTRlMENTS FAILED. ttJl9I ERROR: l!ISINTERPRETATI~ OF DISPLAYED INFO. fff PROIILEN DESCRIPTION: 12/28/86 ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE C(N)LT 16/17/85 r<<lT ~YS POS INDIC THAT INSTRUM HAS FAILED/BECOIE Ir<<JPERATIVE. JIITRS DO NlT FAIL OFF SCR.E; DE FAIL AS IS . 8780 PAAA6RAPH NJIIIB£R: 6.5. l, 1.F SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE A POSITIVE INDICATION THAT AN INSTRIJENT HAS FAILED OR BECOIE IMPERATIVE. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE~ LOSS OF POWER ,ETERS ARE DESI6NED TO FAIL OFF SCALE

• DATA m.LECTIDN DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.MBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND Vfl.IDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRKS: P.9.2-15-3 I IDIS INYCl. lJED: ~RK rtl!IIER LOCATI~ Cll!POfENT NAIi: SYSIDI LOSS CF PWR H MJT IN INV FILE* SUBSYSTEM
• . IOIAN ENSINEERINS DISCRE~Y REPORT SURRY ~IT 2 CODE B 03/17/86 ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED t(J TITLE . RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE ----* 22A020S8 f<<l POSITIVE INDICATION THAT INSTRlJIENTS HAVE FAILED. ltMN ERROR: MISINTERPRETATION CF DISPLAYED INFO. / Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION:

ENG II -6 r<<lT ~WAYS POS INDIC THAT INSTRlJIII HAS FAILED/BECO!E INlPERATIVE. U. NTRS DO t(JT FAIL CFF SCALE, SOIE FAIL AS IS fff

• 1780 PARAGRAPH fOIBER: 6.S.1.1.F SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:

PROVIDE A POSITIVE INDICATION THAT AN INSTRUPIENT HAS FAILED FOR BECOf!IE INOPERATIVE. DISPOSITION: INST~ RIStff VERTICAL BOARD INDICATORS FOR STEAJII GENERATOR WIDE RANGE LEVEL ~NSER wmJll. ALL OTHER HAVE INDICATOR BACKUP OR ARE NOT OF SAFETY SISNF I CANCE. SEE P-77 C21A02005l. DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRKS: P.9.2-15-4 ITEMS INVCl!.VED: LR-2-477 PR-OH81A PR-OH91B

• LOCATION COf!PONENT NAE SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEl'I RM41S RECORDER flAIN STEA,! SYSTEM RM428 RECORDER CDDENSATE SYST91 H t(JT IN INV FILE f 03/17/86
• *
• HED t(J TITLE IUIAN EtEINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE AB ~9 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACO.JAATE OOBi, It.A ERROR: ERROR IN IP RESPOEE, 1H PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION:

02/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW RESPllEIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG I -3 Vtf,/U/85 DISPLAY LISTED DOES rt:IT PROVIDE THE PRECISI~ OR ~RACY REllJIRED WHEN USING IT, 0700 PARAGRMi l'UIBER: 6.5.1.2.A SU36ESTED MCKFIT: PROVIDE 6REATER PRECISION OR ACO.JRACY FOR DISPLAY. 1H DISPOSITION: R£FER TO Pl-71-5 .!29A02201f PIODIFY INDICATOR

• DATA ro..LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ .IN) CODE OBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ ~IDATION ROORKS: P.9.2-16-2 ITEMS IM.VED: _ ~RK NUPIBER LOCATI~ ~T SYSIDI FI-SHN PABe55 IETER SAS WASTE RADIOACTIVE SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM

• *
• OOINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSfiENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE
• RESPONSIBILITY STATUS. DATE 22All2l68 DISPLAYS t()T PRECISE OR ACCURATE OOSi, lUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CJ> RESPCrEE.

fff PROIUM DESCRIPTI~: DISPLAYS LISTED DO ttJT PROVIDE Tl£ PRECISION OR ~RACY REOOIRED WHEN USINS TH9L 07111 PARAGRM-1 NLMER: 6.5.1.2.A S006ESTED ~IT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS, fff DISPCISITI~: REFER TO Vl-73 (29A02236> DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION IWD Vll.IDATlON TP-5,1 DISPU\YS SURVEY R91ARKS: P.9.2-16-3 IT91S INVO.IO: ~RK NI.OOlER LOCATION COIP(JENT "llE LI-DA-218A LI-llA-2198 ~12 IETER DAB312 IETER SYSTEIII DRAINS (AERATED) SYSTEJII DRAINS <AERATED) SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII u -6 rU/38/86

• *
• HUim ENSINEERIIE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RE5r00IBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2861 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE a<<Jl.Qi. tUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN !JI RESPONSE. " fH PROa9I DESCRIPTION:

DISP!.AYS LISTED llO t()T PROVIDE Tl£ PRECISI~ OR ACCURACYREIIJIRED WHEN USIN6 THEM. 8708 PARAGRAPH NlJIBER: 6. 5.1. 2. A SUGGESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE: GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. fH DISPOSITI~: DELETE-lit£ TO NATURE OF PA~ERS, SOUS l'IIJST BE EXPRESS£D AS LOS, REFERS TO A LL RAD. IOITOR SCALES. DATA COLLECTION D£SCRIPTI0N AND CODE rtJIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATICl4 AND ~IDATION* RE~RKS: P.9.2-16-4 ITEMS INVll. VED: 11\RK NUfllBER LOCATION CCJIIIPOrENT ,-SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RAD IIJHITORS ff r<<lT IN INV FILE* CO!IR.T f!6/U/85

• *
• TITLE ttWlN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UN IT2 CODE C 22A82862 DISPLAYS r<<lT PRECISE DR OCCURATE ENW3H. tUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN IP RESPONSE.

Hf PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSEss.ENT LAST REYIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE III-9 V/6/07/85 DISPLAYS LISTED DO t()T PROVIDE Tf£ PRECISICJ,4 OR f:CCU~Y REQUIRED WHEN USirE Ttel. 07j0 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.5.1, 2, A Sl66ESTED OOCKFIT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR OCCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-71-8 128A02213l. r<<l ACTION REQUIRED

• DATA co..t.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE roBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION

!BARKS: P.9.2-16-5 I IDIS INVO.. VED: ~RK TUBER LOCATION Cl)IP()tENT MIi£ Fl-CC-leeA FI-CC-lNB fI-CC-2MI FI-CC-2188 H r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 H r<<lT IN Ih\l FILE 1 H t()T IN INV FILE I H NIT IN Ih\l FILE 1 SYSTEJil SUBSYSTEM OOINEERIH6 DISCREPANCY R£PDRT

• t£D NO SURRY .-'TITLE ' 22Ai2i6J DISPUIYS NOT PRECISE OR ACO.JRATE ENClQf liM ERROR: ERROR IN IJI RESPONSE.

1H PROltiJII DESCRIPTION: I.IHT2 CODE RESPCWSIBILITY 02/28/86 ASS£5S,ENT STATUS DI~YS LISTED .DO N)T PROVIDE Tl£ PRECISION OR ~IMCYREOOIRED WHEN USING THal. *

• 070e PARAGRAPH

~BER: 6. 5.1. 2. A SU66ESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE 6REATER PRECISION OR ACCURJ:K:Y FOR DISPLAYS fH DISPOSITION: DaETED-RECORDER AND SPDS PROBLEM

• DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VI\..IDATION REf!IARKS:

P.9.2-16-6 I TEJIIS INV!l. VED: IIAIIK Nl>>IBER LOCATION CO!PONENT rM: SYSTEM LI-CS-101!A LI-CS-10eB

• LI-CS-lE LI-CS-leeD LI-CS-20M . LI-CS-2MI LI-CS-2N:

LI-CS-296D LR-CS-llil'A LR-CS-1008 LR-CS-100!: ff f()T IN IrfJ FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE

• ff NOT IN IrfJ FILE 1 PAA.388 l'IETER COO'AHfENT SPRAY SYSTEM PAB388 IETER CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM PAA309 l'IETER CONTAIMENT SPRAY SYSTEM PAB389 IETER CONTAJNIENT SPRAY SYSTEM ff NH IN INV FILE
• ff NOT IN IrfJ FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE* SUBSYST91 LAST REVIEW DATE 16/17/85
• *
• HED NO: 22A82t63 IT91S INYO..YED:

liJA EM3INEERIN6 DISCREPAr£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 JIIARK IOIBER LOCATION COfiAJNENT NAPIE SYSTEM LR-CS-109D LR-CS-288A LR-CS-2NB LR-CS-2NC LR-CS-2'1D ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE I ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 / 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• lt.JIIIAH BEINEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE. RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82964 DISPI.AVS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE a<<lJSH. 11M ERROR: ERROR IN c.> RESPONSE.

fff PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION: ENS DISPLAYS LISTED DO NOT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR ACCURACYREOOIRED USING TH91. 8718 PARAGRAPH NOOIER: 6.5.1.2.A SOOGESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS.

• • • DISP0SITI!l4:

REFER TO PI-71-12 (20Ai2215) DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIBER: TP-9, 2 . VERIFICATION AND VR.IDATION R91ARKS: P.9.2-16-7 ITEJIIS INY!l. lJED: -l'AIIK MJIIIBER LOCATION CQIIIJlOfENT NM: SYSTEfll LI-Hl2 GAB326 EER D£111IrA. AND Vll.UE CONTRll. SYSTEfll LI-103 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t LI-116 ff NOT IN INY FILE t LI-161 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t LI-163 QAA326 l'ETER 0£111IrA. Ar4l Vll.UIE CONTRll. SYSTE/11 LI-165 QAC326 METER CtDICll. AND VCLUIE m.TRCl. SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII I -2 to/17/85

• *
• HED t<<J OOINEERING DISCIEPAf<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B TITLE 22Al2l65 DISPLAYS t<<JT PRECISION OR ACCURATE Et<<llSi, ttM ERROR: ERROR IN (J) RESPONSE, 1H PROlliJII DEOCRIPTION:

02/28/86 ~T LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS . DATE I -5 16/07/85 DISPLAYS LISTED DO NlT PROVIDE Tt£ PRECISI~ OR !m.l~YREIIJIRED lf!£N USING THEM. 07118 PARAGRAPH NIJll!BER: 6.S.1.2.A SOOSESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE SREATER PRECISI~ OR ACO.JIW:Y FOR DISPLAYS. 1H DISPOSITION: .REFER TO PI-111-2 !~) DATA cru.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND Vll.IDATION ~RKS: P.9.2-16-8 ITENS INVll.VED: IIARK rumER LOCATION COfilPONENT SYSTEM FI-1-474 FI-i-475 FI-1-484 Fl-1-485 FI-1-494 Fl-1-495 FI-2-474 FI-2-475 FI-2-484 FI-2-485 FI-2-494 ff t41T IN INV FILE t ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NlT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t LAAAl 7 l£TER IIAIN STEAfl SYSTEM LAB417 IETER IIIAIN STEAM SYSTEM NAA417 IIETER IIAIN STEAfl SYSTEM NAB417 IIETER IIIAIN STEAM SYSTEM OAA417 IIIETER .IIAIN STEA,! SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HED r<<J: 22Ae2865 ITEPIS I NVCl. VED: MAK NUIIBER LOCATION CIWIOHENT NAME FI.:Z-495 lm417 IIETER fl.A ENlINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 SYSTEM MIN STEA,! SYSTEJII 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• HED t(I TITLE HIJ!AN EN61N*ERHE DISCR£PA1t::Y REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE 22Ai2t66 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE OOBI. It.A ERROR: ERROR IN OP RESPONSE.

Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE COMPLT 16/97/85 DISPLAYS LISTED DO t(IT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR A:CURACYREllJIRED lf£N USING TH9I. 9798 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER: 6. 5, 1, 2. A SU36ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-AAINTENIKE TO CORRECT

• DATA CCl.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl.J!IIBER:

TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION P.9.2-16-9&12 IIDIS INYO-VED: 11Af1K.NUIIIE£R LOCATION COfl)()f£NT NAflE SYSTEM FCV-2478 FCV-2488 FCV-2498 MI-UHN MI-ut-211 EAA21~ PROCESS CONTROLLER FEEDWATER SYSTEM EAB212 PROCESS ~TRa..LER FEEDWATER SYSTEJII EAA213 PROCESS CONTRO..LER FEEDWATER SYSTEM H t(IT IN lfN FILE 1 RAB312 METER LEAKAGE IOITORING SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM STEAM GENERATORS STEAM GENERATORS STEA,! GENERATORS

• * ** HED r<<l TITLE HUIIIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22A92167 DISPLAYS r<<JT PRECISE OR ACCURATE EtOJ6H tLWlN ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE tff PROIUM DESCRIPTION:

02/28/86 ASSESS:'IENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG III-7 06/07/85 DISPLAYS LISTED DO MJT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR AOO.JRACYREllJIRED WHEN USING TH91. 0700 PARAGRAPH ~BER: 6.5.1.2.A SI.EGESTED BACl{F!T: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-71-2 (20A0221ll DATA CD..LECTION DESCRIPTI()I AND COD£ NUP!BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REl'IARl<S I P. 9. 2"".16-10 IIDIS INYCLVED: MIi< fUIBER LOCATION COMPONENT NAIE Fl-0-932 .FI-0'.'"933 fl-0-969 FI-0-961 FI-0-962 FI-0-963 ff r()T IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff MJT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff MJT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEN SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HED NO TITLE HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 22Ae2t68 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE Er<<lBi tUAI ERROR: ERROR IN l:P*RATOR RESPONSE.

fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSrENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NONE COMPLT 06/07/SS DISPtAYS LISTED DO t()T PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR ACCURACYREGUIRED lfi£N USIN6 TH91 .. 0700 PARAGRAPH NI.Jll!BER:

6. 5.1. 2. A S006ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE 6REATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS fff DISPOSITION:

DEL£TE-PARAPIETERS ARE ON SPDS * . DATA C(llECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NLlf!BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: P. 9. 2-16-11 ITalS ItM:l.VED: NARK t<<.Jfe:R LOCATI~ CQlll)(JNENT LI-0-922 LI-0-924 LI-0-926 Ll-0-928 LI-0-938 ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff l'()T IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJ!I /

• *
• HilllAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESS,ENT LAST REVIEW HED t(J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A92869 DlSPUIYS NOT PRECISE OR ~RATE ErOJ6H IUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE.

fff PAOa.91 DESCRIPTION: NONE DISPLAY LISTED DOES NOT PROVIDE THE PRECISI~ DR ~CURACY REGUIRED WHEN USING no. fff 971N PARAGRAPH NIJIBER: 6. 5.1. 2. A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION DR ACCURACY FDR DISPLAYS. DISPOSITION: DELETE-IF 2 PUIIIPS RUi.!Itfi FL()I WOULD BE a,*. NO~ FLOW I.E. 4,B IS NEAR I'll DDLE IF SOU. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RE!flRKS:. P.9.2-16-13 ITENS INYCl.~: -NARK IUIBER LOCATION COPPOt£NT NAME SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEl'I FI-0-65 H r<<lT IN INV FILE t COfl1PI..T 06/97/85 , ,. *

• HED r<<J TITLE HUIIIAN EtEINEERI~

DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22Ae217i DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE B0..8i IUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN OPERATOR RESPONSE. fff PROFUM DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSll!ENT

• LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS I -2 0(;,/07/85 DISPLAYS LISTED DO r<<JT PROVIDE it£ PRECISION OR ACCURACYREllJIR£D WHEN USING THEPI. UN PARAGRAPH Nll'1BER:

6. 5.1.2, A SOOGESTED BACl<F IT: . PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS.

fff DISPOSITI~: REFER TO PI-71-4 (20A022l@l DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTICl4 AND CODE NUfl!BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS: P.9.2-16-16 I TEIIS Ih'W.. VED: IIARK tOIIER LOCATION COll>ONENT SYSTEM H .r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 LI-CS-181 LI-CS-291 NAA388 METER ~TAIM'ENT SPRAY SYSTB! SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HUIIIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86
• ASSESSP1£NT LAST REVIEW HED t() TITLE 22A82871 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE BO.J6H HlJIIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE.

fff PROBI.BI DESCRIPTION: RESPONSIBILITY DISP\..AYS LISTED DO ~T PROVIDE TH£ PRECISION OR ACCURACY REllJIR£D WHEN USING THEM. uee PARAGRAPH NUJIIBER: 6.5.1.2.A SIJ36ESTED BACl<F IT: PROVIDE SREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITI~: DELETE~RROW RAMx HISf-! AND Lrni EXIST

• DATA COLLECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUPIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS:

P.9.2-16-17 ITEMS IfMl. VED: STAiUS COfllPLT IIA~ NJIIIBER LOCATION co,ip()NENT NAME SYSTE."I SUBSYSTE/11 REACTOR COClANT !PRil'!ARY LOOP, PWR) SYS PI-2-402 PI-2-482-1 NAA41'J 1£TER PM319 IETER REACTOR COll.ANT !PRI~RY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER DATE 06/07/85

• *
• lllllAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 02/28/86 ASSESSl'!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2e72 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE OO&i ltJIAI ERROR: ERROR IN CPERATOR RESPONSE.

fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: ENG

• DISPtAYS LISTED DO MJT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR OCCURACY REil.JI RED WHEN USirE THEPI. UN PARAGRAPH NIJIIIBER:

6. 5, 1, 2, A 5Ui6ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE BREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS,

• fff DISPOSITION:

REFER TO PI-71-7 120A02209), DATA CCllECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NLJIIIBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMARKS: P,9,2-16-18 I TEJIIS INVCl. VED: MRI< NJIIIBER LOCATION COIIPOf£NT NAPE. SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEfll II -S PI-2-~ PI-2-445 P.I-2-455 PI-2-456 PI-2-457 PAA318 PIETER PAB318 METER OM318 METER cm318 IETER IRU19 PIETER REACTOR COCl.ANT IPRil'IARY LOOP, PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER REACTOR CIXIUINT <PRI!IIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER REACTOR COCl.ANT <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER REACTOR C(XIMT <PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER REACTOR COCl.ANT IPRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER / lf,/07/85

• *
• HED NO TITLE tlWlN £N6INEERIN6 DISCREPA.~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 22A92874 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE ENOU6H ' ~ERROR:. ERROR IN IJ> RESPONSE, 1H PROa.EJII DESCRIPTION:

02/28/86 ASSESSfl!ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ** 00 II -5 ~/U/85 DISPLAYS LISTED DO NOT PROVIDE THE PRECISI~ OR ~RACYREOOIRED IIHEN USING THO!. 07N PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6. 5.1. 2. A SlJi6ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION FOR DISPLAYS* 1H DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-71-16 129A02219l DATA CCl.LECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUJl!BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REAARKS: P.9.2-16-20 ITEMS lNV(LVED: MRK rtJIIIBER LOCATION C()llll()t£NT NAflE SYSTEJ!I FI-VS-118 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SUBSYSTE/11

• *
• TITLE HLWlN OOINEERING DISC~CY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22Ai2873 DISP1..AY6S NOT PRECISE OR ACCURATE OOBi tt.-ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

/ fff PROaEM DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESS!'!ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -6 06/~7/85 DISPLAYS LISTED DO t(JT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR ACCU~YREOOIRED WHEN USING THEPI. 97N PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1.2.A 51.SiESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE 6REATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-23 (~l, DATA C0-1..ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl!P.BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION ~RKS: P.9.2-16-19 I IDIS ItMl.lJEDs IIAIIK ttJflll£R LOCATION COflPONENT.l'fl!E SYSTE!II FI-YS-116 FI-YS-2873 MM01!17 IIETER VENTILATION SYSTEM H t(JT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD /

• *
• HED t() TITLE HUll!AN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY OOIT2 CODE 22A82876 DISPLAYS THAT REQUIRE SOfE FD"' CF CO'M:RSION, KM ERROR: ERROR IN INTERPRETIN6.

DEL.AV/ERROR IN RESPONSE, ffto PROlUJII DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSP£NT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE COMPLT V/6/07/85 DISPLAY LISTED REQUIRES SOI£ F08" CF CONVERSION IN ORDERTO EFFECTIVELY USE INFORl'IATION. 07N PARASRUlti OBER: 6. 5.1, 2. B SU66ESTED. BACl(FIT: OfN£ SCIUS OR PROVIDE SECOO!ARV INDICATING FOR DISPlAVS REQUIRlrf:i CONVERSIONS. '** DISPOSITION: DELETE-NOT THIE CRITI~. NOT SAFETY* RELATED, NOT A PROBl..91

• DATA CO-LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJlflRKS:

P.9.2-18-6 ITEJIIS INY(L VED: l'IARK NJIIIER LOCATION CCJllllOt£NT NAIIE SVSTEJII SUBSVST91 SWTCHVD DISP H r<<lT IN INV FILE * *

• *
• HED NO TITLE HU~ ENSINEERHE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 22A82975 DISPLAYS NOT PRECISE OR ACOJRATE ErO.&i. l'UIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSMfNT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS . DATE CQIIIPLT 06/07/85 DISPLAYS LISTED DO NJT PROVIDE THE PRECISION OR ACCURACYREQUIR£D lfiEN USING TH91. 0709 PARA6Rl¥lH Nllti!ER: 6.5.1.2.A SU36ESTED BOCl<FIT: PROVIDE GREATER PRECISION OR ACCURACY FOR DISPLAYS. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO P.9.2-15-4 (22A02858)

• DATA CCUECTIOO DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NI.JfllBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~ VALIDATION REMRKS: P.9.2-16-21 IIDIS INYCL IJED: MRK NUPIBER LOCATION CQIIIPOtENT tM: SYSTEM PR-cN-201A PR-CN-2918 RM420 RECORDER CONDENSATE SYSTEM ff NOT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEfll 1

• *
• HUIIIAN ENSINE£RirE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 COD£ 02/28/86 ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED r<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~77 DISPLAYS ~T REQUIRE SOME FORfl Cf CllNERSI~

!(R ERROR: ERROR IN INTERPRETirE. DELAY /ERROR IN CJl RESP0'4SE. fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: COl4PLT DISPLAYS LISTED REQUIRE SOI£ FOAA Cf CONV£RSI0N IN ORDERTO EFFECTIVELY USE INFDRMTION. 07N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.5.1,2.B SUi6ESTED BAC:KJ=IT:

• DA\13E SCIUS OR PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS FOR DISPLAYS REDUIRI~ CONVERSIONS.

DISPOSITION: AIR FLIM RATE-sEE P.9.2-16-2 !22A02059l, CC HDR FLOW-SEEP.9.2-16-5 (22A02062J, C ST LEVEL-SEE PHH! !2M2007>

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.JIEER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~ AND ~IDATION REJIIARKS: P.9.2-18-7/8/12 ITE..S IfMLYED: . MRK ~R LOCATION COIIPOt£NT AIR FLO RATE CC HDR FLIM CST LEVEL ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t SYSTErlf suesYsm, 06/17/85

• *
• HED NO TITLE HU~ ErtiINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE B 2.2Ae2878 DISPLAYS OOT IOJLD BE USEFUL IN SOE on£R Vil.LE. It.NIN ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATI~

OF DISPUlYED INFO, 11ISR£ADitE If' DISPLAYS. Hf P~ DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS Ill-7 Vi:,/07/85 DISPLAY LISTED lllLU) .BE PORE USEFUL IN INDir.ATED IN S0f1EOTl£R VALL.£. 17'11i PARASRAPH Nll!BER: 6. 5. 1. 2. D. 1 SIJ36ESTED BACKFIT: D4W3E SCUS TO PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-72-2 (~)

• DATA co..LECTI~

nESCRIPTIOO AND CODE ruir£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPI..AYS SURVEY R£11ARKS: P.9.2-19-2 ITEMS INYCl.'ve: MAK NJIIIBER LOCATION C011POt£NT CDSR BACK PR ff NlT IN INV FILE t SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEM

• *
• TITLE Ht.A EN:iINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22A82879 DISPLAYS ~T WllJI..D BE USEFLl IN SOlilE OTHER ~UE. KM ERROR1 IUSINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED INFO; IUSREADING IF DISPLAYS.

Hf PROa.EN DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NOD II -7 86/17/85 DISPLAYS LISTED l<<lULD BE .ORE USEFUL IF INDICATED IN SOI£ OTl£R VALLE. e1ee PARAGIW>H rtJ111I£R:

6. 5. 1. 2. D, 1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: OflfEE SCIU TO PROVIDE SECONDARY INDICATIONS.

Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-110 (28002007) ET. ll.

• DATA CXLLECTill4 DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION~

VALIDATION TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE*IRKS1 P.9.2-19-3/4/5/6/7/8/9/18/12/13/14/15 ITEMS ItMl.VED: IIARK !OBER LOCATION CQlllONENT BAST LYL CAT LVL CST LEVEL BIER CST LYL PDTT LYL PRI DRNS XFR PRZR REL TK PRZR SPRAY RCS FLOW RECIRC SPRAY SI ACClJI LVL ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t

• ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f H r<<lT IN INY FILE t ff t<<JT IN INV FILE t ff t<<JT IN INY FILE t ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f ff r(lT IN !NY FILE t H t<<JT IN !NY FILE t H r(lT IN INV FILE* ff l'()T IN INV FILE t SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEM
• *
• ITOO INIJCl.YED:

~RK NJIIISER LOCATION CCJflPOtENT NAIIIE HilllAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPA1£Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 SYSTEM VCT ff r<<lT IN INV FIi.£ * / I 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEM

• HU~ EN6INEERIN3 DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UN IT2 CODE B TITLE 22A82l88 DISPS t<<lT ADEOOATE IN RANGE, t(IT SlPPORTED BY ll!X INSTRUfENTATl(),I, lt.R ERROR: 1'1SINTERPRETATl()il OF DISPLAYED INFO, PIISREADINS Cf" DISPLAY, -Hf PROBL.al DESCRIPTil)'t:

02/28/86 ASSESSPIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY

• STATUS DATE NOD II -7 to/87/85 DISPLAYS t<<lT ADEQUATE IN TERIIIS OF RAt&: OR ARE t<<lT SUPPORTED BY ~XILIARY INSTIMIENTATION, 0700 PARAGRAPH l'O!BER: 6. 5. 1, 2. D. 3 SI.ESESTED BAO<FIT: PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCIUS/ INSTRUIENTATION, Hf DISPOSITION:

REFER TO PI-lli (~7) ET. * **

• DATA cru.ECTIIJ4 DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARl<S:

P,9,2-2&-2/3/4/5/8 I TENS INVCl. VED: -~RK MJ"8£R LOCATION COPIPONENT rM fW FLm. PDT PR B RCV PDT PR BRT RWST LYI. SI ACClJI STIii FLm. ff t<<lT IN INY FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff t(IT IN INY FILE t ff t<<lT IN INV FILE I ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t H r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEM

• *
• ltJIIIAN,ENSINEERING DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UN IT2 CODE . TITLE _ 22Ai2881 DISPS NlT ADEQUATE IN RANGE, NlT SlJIPORTED BY AUX INSTRUENTATI~

KM ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATION IF DISPlAYED INFO. ,11SREADIN6 CF DISPLAY. fH PROllBI DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSll!ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 I -9 01/Ja/86 -DISPLAYS NlT ADEIDlTE IN TERfllS IF RANGE OR ARE NlT SUPPORTED BY AUXILIARY INSTRIJIENTATION, 07N PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER:

6. 5. 1, 2. D, 3 S006ESTED BACl<FIT:

PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCALES/INSTRU,ENTATION. fH DISPOSITION: ICC INSTIMIENTATION IS BEIN6 UPSRADED. REFER TO E-29 (20A01136l

• DATA CCl.LECTI~

DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5. l DISPLAYS SURVEY REMRKS: P.9.2-28-7 ITEMS INVO.W>: IIARK tUIIIER LOCATI~ COIIIPONENT rM: IP<<:ORE T /C H NJT IN INV FILE 1 I SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEJ!I

• *
• HED r<<l TITLE HlMN Et.SINEERir.6 DISCREPAHCY REPORT SURRY LtHT2 CODE 8 22Al2882 DISPS r<<lT ADEQUATE IN RANGE, r<<lT SUPPORTED BY AUX INSTRUENTATIC*.

tlJAI ER_ROR: IIISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED INFO, 1i1ISREADIN6 DISPLAY. Hf PROIILBI DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSNENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE I -2 ~/17/85 DISPLAYS l(JT ADEQUATE IN TE8'1S OF RANGE OR AR£ l(JT SUPPORTED BY AUXILIARY INSTRUl£NTATION. uee PARAGRAPH NIJIIIBER:

6. 5.1. 2. D. 3 SUGGESTED BACl(FIT:

PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCALES/INSTRUJIENTATION. Hf DISPOSITION: . REFER TO PI-76-2 (20A02414l DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RalARl<S: P.9.2-2H ITEMS INYll.'-9: IIARK rt.lllBER LOCATION COl'llOr£NT SYSTEJII NR S6 LVL ff "'1T IN INV FILE* SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HUfllAN EN6IN£ERIN3 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UN IT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED MJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A92883 DISPLAYS ON. VBS TOO HI8H TO BE VIEWED FRCII.MJM.

VIEWINS AREA tl.JA ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS. H+ PROEl91 DESCRIPTION: NOD I -2 DISPLAYS ABOVE 78" CA,NJT BE VIEWED BY 5TH PERCENTILE FEIR.£ FRCJII NON. VIEWING AREA. (FR 00 CF BBi 07N PARAGRAPH t<<JIIIBER: 6.1.2.2 6.1.2.5.B SUGGESTED BACKF IT: DETERfllirE DISPLAYS THAT ~FECT PLANT SAFETY & RELOCATE TO LOWER LOCATION ON VB TO ENSURE E . ASE CF VIEWING. *** DISPOSITION: PROVIDE A STEP STCXL r<<JTE:. NR BEEN REaJIIIIENDED PER PI-71-4 (20A02210l

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTICN AND CODE NlJIIIBER:

TP-1.2 ~HROPOIETRICS SURVEY ~~S: 1. 2-4-1. SEE WRITIEN HED FOR IT01S WITHWT MRI< rtJIIIBERS. IIDIS Ih'YCLVED1 !ARI< rtJMBER LOCATION COPllQl,ENT rM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LI-CS-281 NAA388 METER CONTAINMENT SPRA~ SYSTEIII 08/07/85

• *
• HUMAN ENSIN£ERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai2t84 DISPUlYS VBS TOO HIGH TO BE VIEWED FRIJI NON. VIEWitE AREA. NOD II -£ It.A ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS.

fff PROILBI DESCRIPTI~: DISPlAYS ABOV£ 70" CArNIT BE VIEWED BY 5TH PERC£NTILE F8!1U FR()! NORMAL VIEWitE AREA. !FR ONT CF BB. l 87ie PARAGRAPH tUBER: 6.1.2.2 6.1.2.5.B SU66£STED BACKFIT: DETERMirE DISPLAYS THAT AFFECT PLANT SAFETY AND R£LOCATETO LOWER LOCATION ON VB TO ENSURE EASE CF VIEWING. 1*4 DISPOSITION: PROVIDE A STEP STOOL FOR ITEJIIS LISTED

• DATA C(llECTI~

DESCRIPTIC14 AND CODE NU!BER: TP-1.2 ANTHRCJPOIIETRICS SURVEY R91Aft<S: 1.2-4-2. SEE WRITIEN f£D FOR ADDITION!l. ITEPIS W/OUT ~RI< r()S IIDIS INVCl~: ~Ill< NJIBER LOCATION CQlll)()f*NT NA,£ SYSTEJII 2-CC-P-lC 2-CC-P-tD 2-CO-P-lB 2-FC-P-lA 2-FC-P-lB 2A2-341 BYP STATUS LTS CC OOTLET FLCII . CDDSR B TUBE CDSR BTUBE a..NR IUECTOR A LAA425 IETER COf!P()£NT CCll.ItE SYSTEIJI l.AB425 IETER CM'ONENT COO..ItE SYSTEJI ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 LM315 LIGHT Fl.EL PIT COO..ItE SYSTEM LM316 LI6HT FUEL PIT ccn.ItE SYSTEIJI ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 H t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE f SUBSYSTEJII 18/U/85

---

~

HUMAN ENSINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86

• SURRY UNIT2 IE>Ml: ITEMS INYCL VED: .w:IRK IOlER LOCATION CCJIIIPONENT NAfE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTE/JI DETECTOR C ff NOT IN INV FILE t DETECTOR E ff NOT IN INV FILE t DETECTOR POSTN ff NJT IN INV FILE t I FI-2-138A NAA317 PIETER REACTOR COOLANT !PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR) SYS REACTOR COil.ANT PlJIIPS FI-2-414 LAC411 METER REACTOR coo.ANT CPRIPIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD Fl-2-415 LAA412 PIETER REACTOR COllANT CPRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-2-416 ~12 1£TER. REACTOR COCl.ANT CPRI.w:IRY.L(X)P 1 PWRl SYS SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-2-424 NAC411 IIIETER l'IAIN STEAM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJ!I FIRST RECORD FI-2-425 NAA412 PIETER REACTOR C!XlLANT !PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD Fl-2-426 ~12 l'IETER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-2-474 I.AA417 IETER MAIN Slmll SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD fl-2-475 ~17 IIETER .w:IIN STEAPI SYSTEl!I SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-2-476 ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-2-4n ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-2-484 NM417 l!ETER NUN STEAM SYSTEM Fl-2-485 NAB417 l'IETER l'IAIN STEAfl SYSTE/11 FI-2-486 ff NOT IN INV FILE t
• FI-2-487 ff NOT IN INV FIL£ t FI-2-932 NAA387 IIIETER SAFETY INJECTIOH SYSIDI CHARSINl FI-2-933 NAA386 METER ~ETY INJECTION SYSTEM . CHARSitE FI-2-948 NAB3e7 METER SAFETY INJECTIOH SYSTEIII CHARGHE FI-2-968 NAB386 IETER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM CHARSINi FI-BD-283A I.AA411 1£TER BLOWDCMN (STEAIII 6ENERATOR/80ILER>

SYSTE!II SUBSYST91 FIRST RECORD FI-BD-213B NM411 PiETER BLOWDOWN !STEAfl 6ENERATOR/B0ILERl SYSTEl'l SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-BD-2MA LAB411 METER BLOWOOiW CSTEAIII SENERATOR/BOILER> SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-BD-2:MB NAB41l PIETER BL!IIDIJIN (STEAfl GEr£RATOR/B0IL.ERl SYSTEJJI SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORD FI-CC-2MA NAA315 METER CM'IJNENT COO.IN; SYSTEM REACTOR COCJUffl PUNPS FI-CC-285A NAB315 IETER COMPONENT COOI.Irfi SYSTEJII . REACTOR COOLANT PtllPS FI-CC-286A l'flC315 IETER WIPOtENT COOLING SYSTEJII -REACTOR COOLANT FI-CC-297A NAA316 PIETER COflPCt£NT COO..ItE SYSTE/11 REACTOR COOLANT PUfllPS FI-CC-218

• LAB314 PIETER COO.ING SYSTEM REACTOR CID.ANT PlJIPS FI-CC-211A NAA314 IETER CIJIPOENT COO.IN3 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-CC-214 NAA423 METER COIIIP!l£NT COO.ING SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-CC-216 NAA425 PIETER CDl9ENT COO.ING SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-CC-217 NAB425 IIETER COIPOtENT COO.ING SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FI-YS-116 111M017 IETER VENTILATIOH SYSIDI f SUBSYST91 FIRST RECORD FI-YS-117A ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t FI-YS-1178 ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-YS-119 METER VENTILATION SYSTEJI 1£AT XDIE TOTL H NJT IN INV FILE t Itm Svr<<:H VLT ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t LI-2-471 L.AB328 fllETER REACTOR COClANT (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PwRl SYS PRESSURIZER LI-2-474 I.AA416 IIIETER IIIAIN Slmll SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD
• Ll-2-475 LAB416 l!ETER IIIAIN STEAfl SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD LI-2..:476 LAC476 PIETER IIIAIN STEAi'! SYSTEM SUBSYSTE/11 FIRST RECORD LI-2-484 NAAA16 IETER fl!AIN STEAi! SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD Ll-2-485 NAB416 METER IIIAIN Slmll SYST01 SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD l<<M ENSltEERINS DISCREAAt<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86
• SURRY UNIT2 l£D NO: 22Al2l84 ITEMS INYCLVED:

IIAIII( NJIIIBER .LOCATION CIJIIIJONENT PAE .SYSTEM. SUBSYSTEM U-2-486 t<<416 METER IIIAIN STEA,! SYSTEJII SUBSYST01 FIRST RECORD LI-2-928 NAA381 METER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM ACCIJU.ATORS U-2-922 ~1 METER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM ACWI.UITORS LI-2-924 NAC311 IETER SAFETY INJECTION SYSIDI ACCUIUATORS LI-2-926 IIIETER ~ETY INJECTION SYSIDI ACCUltJLATORS LI-2-928 NAB382 IE'TER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM ACCUIU.ATORS LI-2-938 r<<392* METER ~y INJECTION SYSIDI OCCUfll.LATORS LI-CC-288 LA8423 IE'TER COfllP!lENT COO.INS SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD U-CS-285 ff r<<JT IN IN\J FILE f l:I-NS-281 NAB498 l'IETER NEUTRCW SHIELD TANK AND COOLING SYSTEIII LI-RS-251A NAA3t9 METER CONTAINfllENT RECIRCUUITINS SPRAY SYSIDI LI-RS-2518 ff NOT IN INV FILE* f()D-VS-58A NMee4 LIGHT VENTILATION SYSTEJII l(JD-VS-588 NAAN8 LIGHT VENTILATION SYSTEM PCY-2455C TAA317 W(TR(l_ REACTOR coo..ANT <PRIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS RELIEF VALVES PCV-2456 TAA316 CONTROL REACTOR C{X)LANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS . RELIEF VALVES PERM STATUS LTS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1

• PI-2-156A NAB317 IIIETER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS REACTOR CTi!LANT PUMPS PH'.-482 r.M418 METER REACTOR coo.ANT <PRIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEf!I FIRST RECORD PI-2-483 NAB411 PIETER REACTOR CO!l.ANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD PI-2-446 ff t<<lT IN INV FILE* PI-2-447 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 PI-2-4::r4A ff NOT IN INV FILE* PI-2-466 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE* PI-2-468 ff t<<lT. IN INV FILE
• PI-2-*H2 LM328 fETER REACTOR COOLANT <PRIMARY LW>, PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER PI-2***H4 I.M415 METER MAIN STEAfl SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEl'I FIRST RECORD PI-2-475 LAB415 IE'TER JIIAIN STEAfll SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD PI-2-476 LAC415 IE'TER MAIN STEAi'! SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD PI-2-484 NAA415 METER MAIN STEAfll SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD PI-2-485 NAB415 IETER IIIAIN STEAM SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD PI-2-486 -,<<415 IETER IIIAIN STEAfll SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD PI-2-934 NAA385 IETER SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-CV-211A LAA311 METER CONTAINMENT VACl1JI SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-cv-211A2

~11 IETER CONTAUIENT VACWI SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-tV-2118 LAA312 IETER DJITAINENT VAClUI SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-CV-21182 ~12 METER CCMAil'tENT VACI.Al! SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-IA-211 LAA314 fETER IM;TRlJIENT AIR SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI.:..IA-211 LAA313 IE'TER INSTRUMENT AIR SYSIDI PRESSURIZER PI-ut-211A LAA311 IETER LEAt<A6E IONITORINS SYSIDI PRESSURIZER PI-lJl-2818 LAB318 METER IOHTORING SYSIDI PRESSURIZER PI-sA-201 LAB313 IETER SERVICE AIR SYSTEPI

• PRESSURIZER RI-RIIIS-151 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE*
• RI-Rf'S-152 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 RI-RNS-153 . ff NOT IN INV FILE* RI-RNS-154 ff NJT IN HN FILE 1 RI-RIIIS-155 ff NOT IN INV FILE*

ltJMAN ENSINEERil'E DISCREPAPCY REPORT 02/28/86

• SURRY UNIT2 . t£ll Nh 22A82l84 ITEJIIS INYCI..VED:

IIAIIK tol!ER LOCATIQIII COfRJENT NAflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII RHIN!H56 ff NOT IN INV FILE

• RI -f!IIIS-261 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RI-RNS-262 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RI-RIIIS-263 ff NOT IN INV FIL£ t RI-91-114 ff NOT IN INV FILE
• RI-SW-115 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RI~14 ff NOT IN INV FILE
• Rl-91-215 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RUN SYr<<:H YOLTS ff NOT IN INV FILE t S0Y-2551A ff NOT IN INV FILE t SJY-2551B H t<<JT IN INV FILE t
• S0Y-2551C HNOT IN INV FILE t SPARE H NOT IN INV FILE
• SOCH LIGITS HNOT IN INV FILE t SYr<<:HROSW>E H t<<JT IN INV FILE
• TI-2-133 LM317 '1ETER REACTOR COOUINT (PRIMRY LOOP, PWR> SYS REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS TI-2-481 NAA488 IETER REACTOR COOLANT !PRIMARY LOOP, PWR) SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD
• TI-2-.\11A I.AA413 IETER REACTOR CO!LANT IPRIMRY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-2-411B L.AC413 l'ETER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-2-412A l.AB414 METER REACTOR COO-ANT (PRIMARY L(J(J), PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD Tl-2-4128
• L.AA414 IIIIETER REACTOR COOLANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-.\12C L.AC414 .iETER REACTOR ccn.ANT (PRIMARY LIXP, PWR) SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-2-412D LAB413 IETER REACTOR coo.ANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSIDI FIRST RECORD TI-2-421A

~13 fllETER REACTOR COil.ANT (PRIMARY LOCP, PWR> SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD Tl-2,.~18 1'<<413 IETER REACTOR CCXlA'ff <PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-2-422A NA8414 JIIETER REACTOR COQJlNT (PRIMARY L(l(I), PWR> SYS SUBSYSTE/JI FIRST RECORQ TI-2-4228 NAA414 IETER REACTOR CCXl.JlNT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-2-422C r<<414 l'ETER REACTOR ~T (PRIMARY L.(1(1), PWRl SYS SUBSYSTE/11 FIRST RECORD TI-2-4220 NA8413 IETER REACTOR CCXlJrff (PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD ll-2-471 Ul:328 IIIETER REACTOR C!XlJINT (PRIIIIARY LIXP, PWRl SYS PRESSURIZER TI-CC-283 HNOT IN INV FILE t TI-CC-285A r<<316 IIIETER COMPIJENT COOi.INS SYSTEM REACTOR CCXlJlNT PIJl>S TI-CC-287A tW3316 METER COPJfENT COOUNS SYSTEM REACTOR COOLANT Pl.MPS TI-CC-219A NAB313 f!ETER CQlll)(JENT CCXUNS SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-CC-214 NAA424 METER (Dl)(l£NT COOLING SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-CC-222 LAA424 METER CQIIIP()£NT CCXLIN6 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-CS-283 Nm388 IETER C04TAiffENT SPRAY SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TI-fC-213 LA8315 METER FLE. PIT CCXLINS SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD TI-NS-211 NAA4l9 IETER NEUTRQIII SHIB.D TAN< AND COOLING SYSTEM SUBSYSIDI FIRST RECORD TI-RS-251A NAA311 IIIETER IDTAINIIIENT RECIRCl.l.ATIN6 SPRAY SYSTEJll SUBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD TREND RECORDERS ff NOT IN INV FILE t TRIP STATUS LTS HNOT IN INV FILE t U2 LOAD lllW RCRD ff NOT IN INV FILE t

• VITAL BUS BUS 1 H t<<JT IN INV FILE
• VITAL BUS BUS 2 ff NOT IN INV FILE t VITAL BUS llJS 3 H NOT IN INV FILE
• VITAL llJS BUS 4 ff NOT IN INV FILE t
• *
• HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPIKY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02./28/86 ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2885 DISPLAYS~

VBS TOOL~ TO BE VIEWED F~ rt1M. VIEWIN6 AREA. II -6 IUIAN ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS. fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: DISPLAYS LrnER THAN 41" CArHJT BE VIEWED BY 5TH PERCENTILE FEflR.E FROM r<<lRl!IAI.. VIEWING AREA * (FRONT OF BB. l t7* PAAA6RAPH MJIIIBER: 6.1.2,2 6.1.2.5.B SUGGESTED BACKF IT: DETEAll!ItE DISPLAYS THAT ~FECT ~T SAFETY & RELOCATE TO HIGHER LOCATION ON VB TO ENSURE EASE OF VIEW Ir<<3. 1*1 DISPOSITION: DISPS LrnER T141N 41" ARE SilllLE INDIC LTS/t<<JN-CRITICAL ll!TRS/RCDRS/INTEGRATORS. D 0 NOT AFFECT SIHTY. NO ACTI!lt DATA cou.ECTION DESCRIPTION iwD CODE NUIIBER: TP-1,2 ~THROPOETRICS SURVEY REIIIRKS:

1. 2-4-3. SEE WRITIEN HED FOR ITOO WITHOUT !IIARK USERS. I TENS INW.. VED: MRK rotBER LOCATION CO!f)OfENT SYSTEM 82fi~118 2-116-P-lA 2-116-P-lB CN DRN PPS CA-SS-281 CS-SS-281 DETECTOR B DETECTOR D DETECTOR E EX""-'STER A EXIRISTER B ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t TAA325 DISCRETE ROTARY DRAINS HVDROOENATED SYSTEM TAB325 DISCRETE ROTARY DRAINS HYDROOENATED SYSTEM ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t H r<<JT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM 08/07/85 HlJ*lN EN6INEERHE DISCREPANCY REPORT 82/28/86

• SURRY UNIT2 l£D r<<l: 22Al2885 ITEJIIS INYCLVED1

~AK NN!ER LOCATION COfllOIENT rA1E SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEPI FCV-CC-212A TBAA89* DISCRETE IIJTARY CClll)()ENT COOLIN, SYSTEJII FCV-CC-2128 T8B489 DISCRETE ROTARY CDIPONENT cm..ItE SYST91 FC'HN-217 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t FCY-FW-258A ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t FtY-fW-2518 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t FX-611-181 lMl57 cn.NTER SAS WASTE RADI~TIVE SYST91 FX-Ql-114A IM¥E COONTER BAS WASTE RADIOOCTI\JE SYSTEl'I FX-91-1148 lM56 CCUfl'ER SAS WASTE RADIOOCTIVE SYSTEJII FX-llHMA UAA051 COONTER FX-lW-1148 UAA852 co..NTER HIC-BD-2NA TAAA89 PROCESS CONTROLL£R BLOWIIOWN ISTEAIII GEtERATOR/BOII.ERl SYST84 HIC-BD-2888 TA8489 PROCESS CCWTRO..LER BLOWDOWN (STEAi'II GENERATOR/BOILER> SYSTai HIC-BD-2NC TM418 PROCESS CONTROLL£R SLOWDOWN <STEAJII GENERATOR/BOILER) SYSTEPI fllV-2286A ff t()T IN INV FILE t lllY-2286B ff t()T IN INV FILE t MOV-2286C ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t NJY-2287A ff t()T IN INV FILE t

• MOV-22878 ff NOT IN INV FILE t NJY-2287C ff t()T IN INV FILE t lll'J-2381 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t lllY-NS-211A TM411 DISCRETE ROTARY NEUTRON SHiaD TANK AND COOL!~ SYSTEl'I fllV-NS-2888 TA8411 DISCRETE ROTARY NEUTRCN SHIELD TANI< AND COOLIN, SYST91 NR-2-46 TAA483 RECORDER Nl.D..EAR INSTRUPIENTATION SYSTEl'I NR-2-47 TAA485 RECORDER NUCLEAR INSTRUIIENTATI~

SYST01 PD1-YS-1N XAB848 IETER V£NTILATI0H SYSTEM PDI-VS-288 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t PDI-VS-281 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t RR-RNS-128P H r<<JT IN INV FILE t RR-RIIIS-228P ff t()T IN INV FILE t SOV-IA-283 TAA313 PUSHBUTT~ INSTRUIIIENT AIR SYST01 SDY-NS-281 TBA418 DISCRETE ROTARY hEUTRON SHIELD TAN< AND COO..IrE SYSIDI SPEEDO-MX ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 TR-BR-128 WAA871 RECORDER BORCN RECOVERY SYSTEJII lV-CC-2159 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 TV-CC-285A ff rtJT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-285C ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 TV-CC-287 ff r<<lT IN INY FILE t .lV-CC-2119 ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-211C ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t TV-CC-212A ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 TV-WS-289 ff t()T IN INV FILE t TV-w-218 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE t .I

• tUIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY l.NIT2 CODE A 02/28/86 ASSESSl'tENT LAST REVIEW HED Nil TITLE . RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2t86 DI~YS VBS TOO LCM/HI6H TO BE VIEWED FROI NJIIR..VIEWIN6 AREA EN6 II -5 tUIAN ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS.

Hf PIDLBI DESCRIPTI~a Ht DISPLAYS LOWER TH~ 41" & ABOVE 71" CAtNIT BE VIEWED BY 5TH jTILE FERE FROM t<<l-VEIWI N6 AREA. (F~T If' BBi 1788 PARAGRAPH ru&:R: 6.1.2.2 6.1.2.5.B 9J66ESTED BACl<F IT: DETE8'1Ir£ DISPLAYS THAT AFFECT ~T SAFETY & RELOCATE TO HIGHER/LOWER LOCATION VB TO E NSURE EASE IF VIEWING. DISPOSITION: DIESEL GEtERATOR DISPLAYS-RELOCATE REARRANSE. INCLUDE Tl<<JSE LOCAL DS PANE L. COORDI"'lTE WITH PI-62 12A3833l

• DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION~

CODE NI.Jfl!BER: TP-1.2 ANTHRIJlOETRICS SURVEY REMRKS: 1. 2-4--4. SEE WRITTEN t£D FOR IT91S WITI-OOT ~RlS OORS VCl. TS 118 DISPLAYS um. 118 Pft. ff "1T IN INV FILE t ff t<<JT IN INY FILE t ff l()T IN INY FILE 1

• H t<<JT IN INY FILE t
• *
• llJMH ENGINEERirE DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Alt2887 DISPLAYS ON VBS TOO HIGH TO BE VIEWED FRIJI NJR,R. VIEWI~ AREA. tUIAN ERROR: INABILITY TO READ DISPLAYS.

/ fff PROIIL9I DESCRIPTICJ4: EN6 I -2 DISPLAYS HIGHER T191 78" CAfHJT BE VIEWED BY 5TH jTIL.E FEIA.E FRIJI t(JAIQ. YEIWI'43 AREA. (F ~T CF BB>. . '788 PARAGRAPH M.JIUlER: &.1.2.2 &.1.2.s.e QJ66EST£D BACl<F IT: . IIETEf!IIIIrE DISPLAYS THAT AFFECT ~T SAfETY & RELOCATE TO LOWER LOCATION ON VB TO ENSURE E . ASE CF VIEWING. ..... DISPOSITION: fllVE TA£ND RECORDERS LOWER~~~ SPLIT PARA!ETERS SO THERE ARE 4 SirELE P AAAIETER RECORDERS

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tOBER: TP-1,2 IWTHIUQETRICS SURVEY AEJIIARKS:

1.2-4-5 ITENS INY(L\Eh lllARK NJIIIBER LOCATION a>>f)()tENT IAIE RA-Rlil!H32 RR-f!IIIS-133 H t<<lT IN INV FILE t H hOT IN INV FILE t SVSTEPI SUBSVSTEPI / 11/11/85

• *
• l{Jl!AN EN6INEERI~

DISCREPAl<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22#l82t88 DISPLAYS~ YBS TOO LOW/HIQI TO VE VIEWED FRCII NORMAL VIEWING AREA It.A ERROR: Irf!BILITY TO READ DI~YS. Hf PROil.9' DESCRIPTI~: EN6 II -5 DISPLAYS LOWER THAN 41 1 & ABOVE 70 1 CAfHJT BE VIEW8> BY 5TH jTJLE FEJIR.E FRCII NORMAL VIEWI N6 AREA. IF~ IF AUX ~>. 1710 PARAGRAPH rtJfft:R: 6.1.2,2 6.1.2.5.B SU68ESTED BACl<FIT: DETEfilllit£ DI~YS THAT ~FECT PUWT SAFETY & RELOCATE TO HISHER/LOWER LOCATION ON VB TOE NSURE EASE IF VIEWING. .._ DISPOSITION: REARRAHSE -ilJX. PAfEL , USE PM. TO RIGHT OF PRESENT PNL. PUT PRI~RY C TRTLS/INSTRtMS LEFT PN-, SECIMlARY RIQIT, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ CODE rtJPIBER: TP-1,2 ANTHRalOETRICS SURVEY R91ARKS1 1.2~-6 ITEMS INIJCl.'S: MRK tt.NER LOCATION CCJIIIPOfENT tM: SYSTEM LI-4678 LI-4nB LI~97B PI-444A PI-464B ff rfJT IN INV FILE f L.AA915 METER ~TER SYSTEM L.AA916 IETER FEEDWATER SYSTEM L.AA913 METER REOCTOR coo.ANT (PRHIARY L(D), PWR> SYS H r<<lT IN INV FILE* SUBSYSTEM STEA,! 6Et£RATORS Srmi! GErERATORS PRESSURIZER 08/97/85

• *
• HED NJ IDIAN ERROR: DELAY IN CP RESPCJeE.

TITLE EN6IN£ERitf3 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY LWIT2 CODE fff PROa.EM DESCRIPTION: NIJIEIRS ON SCALE ARE NOT VERTICL 8718 PARAGRAPH NJMBER: 6. S.2. ~.A !ll66ESTED BAO<F IT: CORRECT THE: DISPLAY FACE SO NUfllBERS ARE VERTICAL. DISPOSITION: 02/28/86 ASSESSJIIENT UlST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE COlll.T 07/15/85 DELETE-SCALES ARE CURVED (ARCSJ AND NUMBERS SLIGHTLY OfF VERTICAL. HOWEVER, NUMB ERS ARE EASILY READ. NJ ACTION, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUIBER: TP-S.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RalARl<S: JP-6 ITBIS Il'Ml.\e>: !!ARK NJIIIBER LOCATICW COlflCl£NT ,-N41B N42B N438 PI-cv2911A)2 PI-cY2811A> 3 PI-cY28l(B)2 PI-cY281A PI-cv2118 RI-CC185 RI-CC116 RI-l.W108 H l'(JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t ff l'(JT IN INV FILE t H NJT IN INV FILE t H l'(JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTE.111 tl.MH EN6INE£RI,.; DISCREPANCY REPORT

• SURRY .UNIT2 *
• l£D NO: 22Al2889 IT01S INYll.YED:

~RI< NJIBEA LOCATION COfRINENT NAIIIE RI-RfilS259 RI-sA114 RI-55213 RI-SVlll AH3W187 RI-SW128 AI-SW228 RI-VS183 ff l'()T IN INV FILE -t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff l'()T IN INV FILE -t ff l'()T IN INV FILE t ff l'()T IN INV FILE -t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff l'()T IN INV FILE -t H l'()T IN INV FILE 1 SYSIDI 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• ftJlllAN E.'EINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODEC 02/28/86 ASSESS/IIENT LAST REVIEW HED l'<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2117 l'OHIERMANENT U COORDINATE DESIGNATORS HlMAN ERROR: POSSIBILITY Cf Tal>ORARY LABELS FALLING !FF CAUSHE DELAY IN CP RESPCNiE.

1H PROIUJII ~SCRIPTI~1 ENG COORDilf!TE DESIGNATORS lJ.I ~!ATOR PAIEI..S ARE r<<lT PERfiRENTLY ENGRAVED. 1788 PARASRAPH MJll:£R: S.3.3.3.C Sl66ESTED r<<KFIT: 'fBl.lORARY DESIGNATORS WITH PERMtaT COORDitflTE D£SI6tflTORS. 14* DISPOSITION: AS PER ABOVE SU66ESTION. SEE PI-85 (20A02106)

• DATA cn..LECTil:W DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIIBER:

TP-3.1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW REJl!Alf<S: 3.1-4 ITEMS INVCl.YED i MIIK l'OIBER LOCATION CONlOt£NT NAIIIE COORD DESISS H t()T IN INV FILE t SYSTEJII III-8 06/06/85 SUBSYST91

• -*
• ltJIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAf.(Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODEC 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82188 IU COORDitflTE DESIGNATORS FOR~ It.A ERROR: DELAY IN READIN6 DESISNATORS.

fff PROll.EM DESCRIPTION: ENS IU COORDINATE LABEL ~RACTERS ARE IIJCH LARSER THAN T~~TERS IN TILE LEEiENDS 9700 PARASRAPH NJIBER: 6.3.3.J~C.3 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: III-8 REPLACE IDIPORARY DESIGNATORS WITH PERfi!ANENT ENGRAVED DESIGNATORS THAT IEET 0700 GUIDELINE

s. '*'* DISPOSITION:

REFER TO 3.1-4 (22A82107l DATA Cll.LECTION DESCRIPTION~~ !UBER: TP-3. 1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW IE"IRKS: 3.1-5 ITENS INVCl. VED s IIIARK NJIIBER LOCATION COfl>Cl£NT IU COOR DES ff t(JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEfll 06/06/85

• *
• ttJ*W ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 alDE 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t(I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22M2119 ILLlMINATED ll.Alt( ANUCIATOR TILES. ltJRf ERROR: IE.AV/ERROR IN IJ> RE~. COflIMJUY ILLLJIIINATED IURII Tl LES CAN LESSEN ~RTIN6 POTENT!~ AND 1 DISTRACT CPS. fH PROIUM D£SCRIPTI0N:

l*.tCIATOR IESSASES ARE TWO PER TILE, Bl.IN< ANNKIATORTILES ARE ILLlJIINATED. 1788 PARAGRAPtl l'OIBER: 6.3.J.3.F S008ESTED BACKFI_T: anUNATE ILLI.JIIIINATED TILES <TILES WITli(lJT IESSA6ES). fH DISPOSITIO'f: DELETE-SURVEY~ PERFORIED WITH ANNUf£IATORS IN *TEST* BI..AtfT IN INV FILE f ff r<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff rf>T JN INV FILE f ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f ff r<<lT IN INV FILE f ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NJT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM I C()RT 06/06/85

• *
• ttJA EMiINEERIN6 DISCREPKY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE A TITLE
• 221112111 IUIBER CF TILES PER ALB EXCEED 51. 11.M ERROR: DELAY IN (J) RESPOOSE.

<DELAY IN LOCAT1N6/ID*NTIFYIN6 /UR,!). Hf PR01UN DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITV STATUS DATE II -5 96/96/85 1U CONTAINS l<<lRE THAN 51 TILES. ALBS A, B, C, D, 6, H, J&K 64 TILES (8X8> ; ALBS E&F H !WE 81 TILES 18Xll>. 8789 PARAGRAPH MJillER: 6. 3. 3. 3. D. 1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: FUfCTIINUY GRO.P DEMARCATE !US. Hf DISPCISITI~: REFER TO ANtN:IATOR STUDY PI-85 121A02196l DATA m..LECTil>>C DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE rDBER: TP-3.1 Aff(JNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REMARKS: 3.1-9 ITBIS IN'Jll.VED1 _ NAIi< UBER LOCATION COflPONENT ,-IUA IUB IU C ALB D IU E ALB F IU 6 IU H IU J IU K ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1. ff l'<<JT IN INV FIL£ t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ I ff l(IT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff l(IT IN INV FILE 1 ff l'<<JT IN INV FILE 1 H MlT IN INV FILE t ff l'<<lT IN INV FILE I SYSIDI SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• HED Ml 22Al21 l 1 M. MEANING TILE LEGEHDS. tlJIAH ERIKJR: DELAY IN IP REP(NlE. HI PROBI.BI DESCRIPTION:

ltMN EN6Il'£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE A TITLE DIA.-fEANING, r<<lN-SPECIFIC TILE NESSSA6ES. 878" PARAGRAPH MJIBER: 6,3,3.4.C SU36ESTED BACl<FIT: COIIUTER GENERATED IURM.TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC to,IPONENT, ... DISPOSITION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW RESPCtEIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 II -5 96/87/85 REFER TO ANN STUDY PER PI-85 (20A02106). HI-l.O ANN TIILES ~T CHAt<<D Site£ IP W !lLD NEXT LOO< AT IND TO VERIFY, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NUIIIBER: TP-3,l ArfOICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW TP-8. 1 COOENTIOHS SURVEY REJIIARKS: 3.1-1, LISTED ITEJIIS SIO..LD BE SPLIT,. OTl£RS lllAY BE Dili¥.., ITEJIIS ItMl. VEih MARK rullER LOCATION C()flffl£NT rM A ~4 A ~5 A A-6 A B-1 A B-5 AB~ B B-1 B B-2 B D-7 B E-1 B E-7 ff NJT IN INV FILE I ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1

• ff MIT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 H NlT IN INV FILE t SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM
• l£D NO: 22A821 ll ITEJIIS INYa.. YED: tUMN Et.6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 MAK NJMBER LOCATION COlflOf£NT NUE SYSIDI D ~1 H NJT IN INV FILf
• D ~J HNOT IN INV FILf I D B-1 H NJT IN INV FILf
• D B-J HNOT IN INV FILE t D C-1 HNOT -IN INV FILf f D C-J H NOT IN INV FILE t D D-1 H NJT IN INV FILf
• D D-J H t<<lT IN INV FILf I D E-1 H NJT IN INV FILf t D E-5 HNOT IN INV FILf I D F-19 H NJT IN INV FILE t D F-2 ff NJT IN INV FILf t D 6-1 H NJT IN INV FILf
• 6 84 ff NJT IN INV FILE* 6 B-7 H NJT IN INV FILf t 6C4 ff NJT IN INV FILE t 6 D-4 ff NJT IN INV FILE* H ~J ff NJT IN INV FILE f
• HB-J ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* H C-J H NlT IN INV FILf
• H D-6 H t<<JT IN INV Fllf t H F-2 HNOT IN INV FILf
• H F-5 ff NJT IN INV FILf f H F-f, ff t<<JT IN INV FILE* H F-7 H NJT IN INV FILE* J 1H ff t<<JT IN INV FILf
• J E-4 H NJT IN INV FILE t K ~J ff NOT IN INV FILE f K E-8 ff NJT IN INV FILE t
• V/2/28/86 SUBSYSTEJII
• *
• t<<JA EH6INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE A 02/28/86 AS&SSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPOOIBILITY STATUS DATE ~U2 INADEQIJITE LETTER t£I6HT ON ~IATORS. ENS II -5 KMAN ERROR: DELAY IN CPERATOR RESP!HlE.

fH PROllBI DESCRIPTI~: . L£TTER HT IF .20*: ANN~ STA DISTIK.£ EXCEEDS se* IIIRXVIEWIN6 DISTIKE FOR .20* HI6H LET TERINi>. 8788 PARA6Rf¥1H ttl&R: 6.3.3.5.A.1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: RE-81,RAVE TILES TO IEET 0788 6UIDa.INES. fH DISPOSITION: . REFER TO ANNUICIATOR STUDY Pl-85 l20A02116> DATA m.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-3.l Arft.lNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW RalARKS: 3. l-12 !TENS ltMl.'JED: MRK IOSER LOCATION COfllONENT SYSTEM H t()T IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM 16/16/85

• *
• IUAN EN6INEERIN6 DISC:REPAfCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RE~IBILIJY STATUS DATE 22Al2114 UAIEQtJITE WIDTH-T1-t£I6HT RATIO ON AltUCIATDR

~TERS, IUIAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN a> RESPONSE. fff PROILEJII IESCRIPTICIN: ENG II -5 roER. WIDTH-To-t£I6HT RATIO IS LESS T~ 3:5.; IT IS 2:5 AND CHAIW:TERS APPEAR UM3 AND IAfRCM. 8788 PARAGRAPH ft.lllBER: 6,3,3.5.D.3 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: REPUa W/ TILES THAT~ CORRECT B780 GUIDELINES RECQIJIIENDED NUMER. WIDTH-TO-t£I6HT RAT IO (F 3:5. Hf DISPOSITION:

• REFER TO ANUCIATOR STLl>Y PER PI-85 (2BA02106l
• DATA CB.LECTION DESCRIPTION~

CODE NUMBER: TP-3.1 IMDICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW 3.1-J I TENS IJMLYED: NARK USER LOCATION COflOfOT ,-IU. N LETT ff NJT IN INV FIL.£ t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 06/06/85 ' '

• *
• HED Nl TITLE ltJtAil EN6IfEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 aJDE A 22Al2115 LETTER SPACINS-INADEDTE SPACING ft<<.KIATOR TILE L11'£S. . It.A ERROR: DELAY IN o> RESPONSE.

/ 1H PROBLEJil DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPtWSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 II -5 86/86/85 BEnEEN LitES ON NKIATOR TILES (.88 1) IS LESS THAN CW£ 1R.F THE ~TER HEIGHT (l/2 If' .29"=.lt"). 9718 PARAS~ tOBER: 6.3.3.5.D.6 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IE-BERAYE IM<<.KIATOR TILES TO ,£ET 1710 6UIDELINES. 1H DISPOSITION: REFER TO IMJCIATOR STUDY PI-85 (20A821"6l DATA cru..ECTION DESCRIPTI~ aJDE UBER: TP-3. 1 ~ICIATOR SYSTEPIS REVIEW REMARKS: J.1-6 I TEJIIS IN\ICl. VED: IIARK fUISER LOCATION ~T tAE SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM ANN TILES ff t()T IN INV FILE t /

• t<<JIIAN EN:iINEERlrE DlSCREPAN:Y REPORT SURRY ll4IT2 CODE A 02/28/86 ASS£SSIIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESP!HiIBIUTY STATUS DATE 22Al2116 SIL.Ba a>>mo.s FOR ANU<<:IATORS.

EN6 II -5 HJAI ERROA1 11£LAY IN SILOCINS AVAIUiU INLN:IATOR Ii.ARN. Hf PROIUJII IIESCRIPTI~: TI£ N CTILS Clil BBS llEUJI li.B J-AND C, RESPECTIVELY, DO NJT ANN SIL.aa COO'RO.S. 97N PARA6RAPH tUll£R: 6.3.4.1.A.1 SlSiESTED BOCKFIT: PROVIDE ANN.JrCIATOR SIL.aa PUSlilUTTON FOR USC & J, Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-37 (28883885> DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTIB, CODE NIIIIER: TP-3.1 ANM.WICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW R0IAll(S: 3.1-8 ITEMS IrMl.VED: AK JOIIER LOCATION COfRlQT NAIE N CTILS H NJT IN INV FILE t SYST91 S1JBSYST9I 96/16/85

• * * ~-EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPCiEIBILITV STATUS DATE 22Al2117 ANIUCIATOR mmn LABEI.IN6/CODIN6.

tl.R ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESPOilSE. fff PROllBI DESCRIPTlm.: CIJlll.T al..OR/S>f.lPE ITVPE IF CTRL> FOR CTRLS SIMILAR TO CTRLS FOR: SI ACMTION, CIS ACMTIIJ,I I REACTOR TRIP, (RMRI() fH 17N PAAAGR1¥1H NJMBER: 6. 3. 4.2. B. 4 £1.166ESTED BACKFIT: PROYIDE LABEi. OR COLOR CODE PUSHBUTTON TO ENSURE EASY ID£NTIFICATI0N OF ANM.JtCIATOR COHTRO LS. DISPOSITIIJ,I: DELETE-CONTln.S IN (1£STIIJ,I ARE APPROPRIATELY SRCX.PED, SAFETY SYS CONTROLS OOAR DED KWE al..OR CODED LABELS. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTIIJ,I CODE tUIBER: TP-3.1 AMOICIATOR SVSTENS REVIEW REIWll<S: 3.1-7. PROB DESC ICOO'>: SI RESET, CIS RESET, RX TRIP RESET I TENS IN'Al. \/ED: NARK !UBER LOCATim. COIIP(lENT rM SYSTEM* SUBSYSTEJII ANN CTIU ff NlT IN INY FILE t 96/96/85

• *
• ttJlllAH El'EINEERIN6 DISCREPAl<<:Y REPORT . SURRY ~IT2 CODE A HED I'<<) TITLE 22Al212J I'<<) PRINTOOT FOR Ill.TI-INPUT Alft.lCIATOR.

11M ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN ex> REsm&:, 1H Pm.Bl DESCRIPTICJI: 02/28/86 ASScSSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 II -5 07/11/85 fll.TI-INIUT ANN.N:IATOR DOES r<<!T PRINTOOT. I~ILITY TO D£TE1!MINE lffIDi H AS BEEN ~TIVATED, 87N PARASRAPH MER: 6.3.1.2.C.2 QJ66£STED BACl<F IT: INSTIU PRINTOUT CAPABILITIES FOR IU.TI-IN>UT Atf<<JNCIATORS. 1H DISPOSITICJI: REFER TO PI-85 (28A92116) AND PI-2 (20Al2101> ANN.t<<:IATOR STUDY

• DATA cw.ECTICJI DESCRIPTI~ CODE OBER: TP-3.1 ~ICIATDR.

SYSTBIS R£\1IEW REl'ARKS: C-17 I TENS INYCL le: NARK IOIIER LOCATICJI l:OfllOENT SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM UTI-IN ANN H NJT IN INY FILE t

• *
• It.A EN6IrEERIN6 DISCREPAICf R£PORT 02/28/86 SURRY ~IT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE REsmEIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82126 TEJClORARY ANfUCIATOR TILE IESSA6ES. ERROR: INABILITY TO DETERIIIINE IF IMOCIATOR TILE IS LIT. Y/ERROR IN CP RESPCWSE.

11-f PRCIILEM D£SCRIPTICW: TWO INUCIATOR TILES USE DY~ TIV'E TO DISPLAY IESSASES 0790 PA~RAPH NUIBER: 6.3.3.5.C.1 Sl.GGESTED BOCKFIT: CCNU ItCREASE LETIER t£ISHT TO ~ORM TO 0700 6UIDELH£ RECOPUENDED t£ISHT FOR CRS VIEWirE DIS TAl'<<:E. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-APHJCIATORS BEEN l()VEI) P£R DC 83-85. IESSA6ES ARE rtlW OORAVED ON P ANEL VNTX-R. DATA cou..ECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE NJMBER: TP-3.1 Arft.lNICIATOA SYSTEJIIS REVIEW REIIARKS: 3.1-11 I TEJIIS INVCi ~: lflRK f'OIBER LOCATIOH COfl)()£NT NAIE TILE IES H r(JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEPI '116/07/85 l I I

• *
• tUMN Et4i1t£.ERIN6 DISCREPAOCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODEC HED r<<l TITLE 22A82127 DE*IRCATI~

LINES ALBS. KR ERROR: D£LAY /ERROR IN OP RESPO&. Ht-PROBt.8' DESCRIPTI~: DYNATAPE IS L£D FOR DE~RCATION LINES ON E $WO F. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.6.6.2.C SUSSESTED BACl<FIT: ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NOD III-8 96/96/85 INSTALL PERPIANENT .DelARCATION LINES. US£ HISHLY DURABLE TAPE SUCH AS 'l!TO PINSTRIPIN6.

• • • DISPOSITION:

AS PER ABOVE .BAO<f IT

• DATA CD...LECTI~

DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE OBER: TP-3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATI~ AIDS SURVEY IDIARKS: 3.1-2 ITEMS INVll. VED: ~RK tOIBER LOCATION COPIPONENT NAfilE IU E ALB F ff rtJT IN INV FILE* ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

• *
• l£D NO 22Ai2229 POOR ~TRAST DISPLAYS.

fiMN ERROR: TITLE DELAY /ERROR IN [P RE~. Hf: PR0Bt£III DESCRIPTI~: IUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY llcIT 2 CODE B ./ ~RAST ON VERTICAL SCALES IS POOR. 8710 PARAGRAPH tu!BER: 6.5.1.3.C.1 6.5.1,3. C.2 SUSGESTED BACl<FIT: COLOR CONTRAST OF TH£ SC/US. Hf: DISPOSITION: ~~Pt.ATES TO WHITE CSEE LI-cN-100 AND Ll-cN-101)

• DATA 00...LECTION DESCRIPTION CODE UBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY ~RKS: JP-1 I TEIIIS I l'MlL VED: YI-1Jf11S-290A YI-IJIIIS-280B YI-YIIIS-201C LOCATION COMPONENT NAP!!: NAA319 fETER NAB319 PETER '"319 11£TER SYSTEM MAIN STEAM SYSTE~ MAIN STEAi'! SYSTEl'I MAIN STEAM SYSTE" 13/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -6 SUBSYSTEM PRESSURIZER PRESSURIZER PRESSURIZER I 83/17/86
• *
• EN3INEERIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY LWIT2 CODE 82/28/86 ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW HED t() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 221182221 MESSA6ES PRINTED ON DISPLAY F~S SH00LD BE BRIEF. ERROR: DWlY IN READING DISPLAY. fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:

COR.T Itf=ORJIIATION ON VERTICAL SCIU DISPLAY FACES ARE REDl.N>ANT WITH INFORIIIATION ON .NAfE PLATES. 0710 PARAGRAPH Nt&R: 6. 5. 4.1. C SIJ36ESTED BAO<FIT: aIIIII~TE REDUNDANCY FR[lll VERTIC&l. SCALES DISPLAY FACES. DISPOSITION: DELETE -THESE SHWLD BE CONSIDERED A PART OF LABELING STUDY !SEE PI-82 129Aell0 1).) DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIIBER: TP-S.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE*\RKS: JP-S ITEJIIS INYCl. VED: -!ARK tUIBER LOCATION COIIPClf,ENT NAfE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM VERT~ H t()T IN INV FILE f 87/1S/85

• *
• HUMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW HED NIJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE IIIRE mlN NINE GRADUATI~

SEPARATE NIIEIR.S 00 nE SCIU. ttJIW ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN IP RESP06E. fH PROBlBI DESCRIPTIOO: IIIORE THAN NINE S~TIONS SEPARATE N>>IERALS ON SCALES. 07e0 PARAGRAPH NlllBER: 6.5.1.5.A.1. 6.5.4.1,C SUGSESTED BACKFIT: REPLACE WITH SCIU SHClHNG ~S AT EVERY 10TH INCREJENT. fH DISPOSITION: REPLACE SCIUS WITH ONES SH()jIN6 UEIRS EVERY 11TH INCREll£NT

• DATA 00..LECTIOO DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NlMBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: JP-7 IIDIS INV0-"9: PIARK NUMBER LOCATION COIIIONENT NAIi£ SYSTEM 2-cN+lA M8216 IETER COODENSATE SYSTEM 2-cN+lB 1¥1:216 IETER CCNlENSATE SYSTEM 2-cN+lC AAA217 IETER CONDEhSATE SYSTEM 2-FW-P-JA AAB215 IETER FEEDWATER SYSTEM 2-FW-P-3B AAA216 IETER FEEDWATER SYSTEJII 2-FW-PHU ff NJT IN INV FILE t 2-FW-PI-A2 ff NJT *IN INV FILE

• 2-FW-Pl-82 ff NOT IN INV FILE t 2-RC-P-lA AAA118 EER REACTOR COCIMT (PRl~Y UXP, PWR> SYS 2-RC-P-18 AA8118 IETER REACTOR ro.:uwT (PRIMARY LCXP, PWR> SYS 2-RC-P-lC AAA119 PIETER REACTOR COil.ANT !PRIPIARY UXP, PWR> SYS II -6 85/82/85 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• ITEPIS INYCl.VED:

HlJ!AN EN6IrEERIN6 DISCREPIWCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 82/28/86 MRK NJIIIIIER LOCATION COfllONENT NAME SYSTEM S1JBSYST0I 2-RS-P-lA AAC107 IETER CIMAINENT RECIRCll.ATitE SPRAY SYSTEM 2-RS-P-1B AAA118 METER CIMAINIENT RECIRCUI.ATIN6 SPRAY SYSTBI 2-RS-P-2A 1¥ml08 IETER CONTAINENT AECIRCll.ATitE SPRAY SYSTEM 2-RS-P-28 AAC108 IETER CllflAINENT RECIRCUI.ATIN6 SPRAY SYSTBI OC-P-lA ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-2-158 PAB324 METER ()£JIIICll. AND VOLIJE comn SYSTEM LETIDiW FI-2122-A ff NOT IN INV FILE t FI-2168 HNOT IN INV FILE t FW-PI-2446 ff NOi IN INV FILE t FW-PI-2447 H NOT IN INV FILE f LR-CS-200 OAA388 RECORDER CONTAINENT SPRAY SYST01 LR-CS-212 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-201A #'IAA915 PIETER NAIN ST£AIII SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-2'1B *IB915 IOER IIIAIN STEAM SYST01 PRESSURIZER PI-201C 11&¥l916 l'IETER NAIN STEAM SYSTEM PRESSURIZER PI-2145 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-2168 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-24e2-1 ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-2472 HNOT IN INV FILE t PI-444A LAA913 IETER REOCTOR COlUWT (PRIMRY LOCJl, PWR> SYS. PRESSURIZER PI-L0-200 RAA424 IIETER LUBE OIL ITREATIENT/STORA6E ONLY> SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD RCP-TR-2448 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-Fl24254 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RCS-fI-2414 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2415 ff NOT IN INV FILE f RCS-FI-2416 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2424 HNOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2425 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2426 HNOT IN INV FILE f . RCS-FI -2434 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2435. ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-FI-2436 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t RCS-PI-24e2 ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-TI-2411B ff NOT IN INV FILE t RCS-TI-2412A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RCS-TI-24128 ff NOT IN IPN FILE t RCS-TI-2412C ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 5-FW-PI-Bl ff NOT IN INV FILE t TI-2-453 RAA320 IETER REOCTOR COCLANT (PRIMRY LOOP, PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER TI-2-454 RAB329 METER REOCTOR coo.ANT (PRIMRY LIXJ>, PWR> SYS PRESSURIZER TI-2450 ff NlT IN IPN FILE t

• *
• llM EN6IN£ERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY Lt4 IT2 CODE 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82223 EXCESS Itf=ORMATION IS PAINTED~ DISPlAY FACE. tUIAH ERROR: DELAY IN READitE DISPLAY. fff PROIUM DESCRIPTION:
• M.f'~TURERS T~RK IS PRINTER ON Tf£ DISPLAY F~ IB700 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6. 5.1, 4, B Sl.66ESTED BACKFI T: ELHHrf\TE Tl£ TRADE1'ARK ON THE FACE CF THE DISPLAY, 1-14 DISPOSITION:

DEL£TE -TRADEMARKS ON DISPLAY FACES DO t{)T INTERFERE WITH READABILITY

• DATA CCllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY R91ARl<S:

JP-4. ITOO INY: l'AJORITY OF METERS, t()T INCLUDif<<l RECORDERS IIDIS JNY(l. VED: !!ARK NJMBER LOCATION C()M)()£NT NW: SYSTEJII IETERS H t()T IN INY FILE f COR.T U/15/85

• SUBSYSTEJII
• *
• ttM ENGINEERIN6 DISCREPArCV REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSl'IENT
• LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al222~ CIRCl.l.AR SOl.E VALUES !~REASE WITH CLOCKWISE
• lY9IENT OF POINTER. ID-lT IOIAN ERROR: DELAY IN CP RESPONSE.

1H PROfUN DESCRIPTION: CIRCll.AR SC~ VAll.lES DO t(JT Ir£REAS£ W/ CLOCKWISE lllVEIENT. 5aUS IS LOCATED ARCXMD A lE RO OR rtll POINT 1711 PARAGRAPH tUIBER: 6.5.2.l,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: IDENTIFY AND LABEL VALUES OF D.E AROI.JID THE ZERO OR tt.lL POINT, 1H DISPOSITION: DELETE -THESE IETERS ARE WITHIN t(JR,R. ELECTRIC POWER CONVENTION. DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: JP-11 ITEMS INW. VED: IIARK NJMBER LOCATION CIMIClt*NT GEN IESAYARS RES Bil. VOLT ff t(JT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE* SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM 11/31/86

• *
• It.A EN6INEERIIE DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASS*SSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE REsmEIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82225 VERT~ YALUES SHOOLl) Il'CREASE W/ lJlWARD IIJVBIIENT CF POINTER. IUAil ERROR: CAN RESLlT IN A DELAY IN READirE THE SClti, I fff PROFUM DESCRIPTION:

VERTICll. SCALE VALLES DO r<<JT Il'CREASE WITH UPWARD IIJV8ENT CF POINTER. 0700 PA~RAPH NUMBER: 6, 5. 2.1. B S006ESTED BACKFIT: REPIJV:E WITH SCALE THAT It£REASES WITH UPWARD IIOYalENT CF POINTER, fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-flETERS ARE WITHIN t()Rl'A. ELECTRIC POIER CONVENTIDH. DATA CO...LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RENARKS: JP-12. 13 1£TERS) ITEMS INVO.. VED: MRI< rtfflBER LOCATION COfllOhENT rfW: SYSIDI H r<<JT IN IrN FILE f .t COR..T 07/15/85 SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• tlMf OOINEERIN6 DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B '2.lcB/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2226 POINTER TIPS CCNEl. 6~TICIN NARKS OR NIJEIR.S, IUIAN ERROR: InAY /ERROR IN CP RESPCNE. fff PROBLEII DESCRIPTION:

POINTER TIPS COtaAL D.E 6RAIJUATION JIIARKS OR NJIIERALS. e7ee PA~RAPH NUMBER: 6. s. 2, 2. A. 2 S006ESTED BACKFIT: l)¥lN6E POINTER TIPS TO PIINIJIIIZE cor<<::EAUENT OF SCIU 6~TION IIIARKS OR tUIERALS. . Hf DISPOSITION: RND INDICS: i COrcEALE BUT OBVIOUS FROPI IP POSITION. IRP INDICS: POINTER '41RRCM AS POSS W/0 IIIIPAIRIN6 READAFlTY DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION CODE NlJIIIB£R: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: JP-14 !TOO INYO. VED: -JIIARK ~R LOCATION CCJIIP()IENT f4II£ IRP INDICS ROOND IND ICS ff NJT IN INY FILE t H NJT IN INY FILE I SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM II -7 85/82/85

• lt.R.EN:!INEERIIE DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE -----------------------

---

~7 POINTER/BOCKGROOND a:NTRAST, POINTER SIZE ItfUBIT RAPDI REC06NITIO tO£ CDRT KJNAH ERROR: ~Y/ERROR IN CP RESPCHiE.

Hf PRDa.al IIESCRIPTI~: POINTER/BACKSR(XN) CONTRAST AND POINTER SIZE DIES NJT PERMIT RAPID RECtJ;NITI~ CF POINTER POSITION. 1780 PARAS~ rtJIIIBER: 6,5.2.2,C SUS6ESTED MCKFIT: POINTER SIZE OR POINTER/JW:KSRCNHl CONTRAST TO ~OW FOR RAPID REC06NITI~ CF POINT ER POSITION. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-POINTER SIZE IS ADE~TE FOR READABILITY. WIDER POINTER .<<)11.D BLOCI< MRKIN3S. NO ACTION. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ CODE MJIIIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REIIIRKS: JP-15 ITEJIIS INYCl. VED: MRK fUIBER LOCATION COIIJOPENT NAf£ ff r<<)T IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 11 NOT IN INV FILE I ff r<<)T IN INV FILE I ff t<<JT IN INV FILE

• SYST8' CRD SI24i B DETECTOR A DETECTOR B DETECTOR C DETECTOR D DETECTOR E 1121-tfi-281 N31 SRCE RN6 N32 SRCE RNS IETER HYDROOEN SAS SYST8' ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff r<<)T IN HN FIL£ 1 SUBSYST8' to/87/85 *. N35 INT RN6 N36 INT RN6 ff r<<)T IN INV FILE
• HNOT IN INV FILE 1
• *
• HED NO: 22A82227 IT91S INYO..VED:
• ttJMN ENSINEERil'ti DISCREPANCY R£PORT SURRY UNIT2 NARK rtJf!BER LOCATlc>>I CC!llfflENT NM:: SYSTEM N37 CONPRTR N41A AVG PWR N41B LWR DET N41B ll>R llET N42A AY6 PWR N42B LWR DET N42B UPR DET N43A AVG PWR N43B LWR DET N43B UPR DET N44A AVG PWR N448 LWR DET M44B UPR DET PDI-YS-108 PDI-YS-101 PDI-YS-218 PDI-VS-201 POINTERS RI-CC-105 RI-CC-186 RI-Oi-118 RI-Ot-119 RI-at-218 RI-at-219 RI-i3W-101 RI-91-102 RI-LW-108 RHIS-128 P RI-fllS-227 0 RI-Rf! SERIES RI-8'16-127 I RI-8'16-228 P RI-RIIIS-259 RI-8'16-268 RI -8'16-261 RI-8'16-262 RI-RJIIS-263 RI-Rf!IS-264 RI-SA SERIES RI-SS-213 RI-SS-215 RI-SV-111 RI-SV-211 RI-SW-107 RI*128 RI-SW-201 RI-SW-214 ff tCIT IN INY FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE f .ff P<<lT IN INV FILE f ff rfJT IN .INV FILE 1 H NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 XAB048 METER VENTILATI~

SYSTEfll ff r<<JT IN .INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff P<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff P<<lT IN INV FILE f ff P<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INY FILE 1 ff NOT IN INY FILE 1 HNOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 . ff P<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 *' f/2./28/86 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HED NO: 22A82227 ITEMS INVCI.VED:

llM EtEINEERINi DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 IIARK rtlMBER LOCATI~ ClJIIRJ£NT NAIE SYSTEM RI-SW-215 RI-sw-216 RI-SW-217 RI-VS-114 ff NOT IN INV FIL£ t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FIL£ t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ~/28/86 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• KJ1AN ERROR: DISPLAY READirE ERROR. 1H PROBl9I DESCRIPTI~:

TITLE H1.1MN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT SURRY Lt,iIT2 CODE B NJ saL£ ON TR -PAPER IS '3Cll.ES, BUT NOT TR ITSELF. 1798 PARAGRAPH UBER: 6. 5.1. 4. A SU36ESTED BACl<FIT: INSTIU SCIU ON TR. lff DISPOSITION: OR REMRK SC~ £ AS IPPROPRIATE

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIP~ IO't AND CODE NJ,JIBER:

TP-9.2 VERIFI:ATI0'1 AND VALIDATION TP-5. l DISPLr,YS Sl' REMARKS: VI-71. 1-EM INVOLVED ON RCP S8l. I.EAl<OFF FL.Bi -LO RN6 ITEJIS INYCl. VED: NARK ru&'.R L .cATION CIWClNENT ,-SYSTEM 02./28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NOD II -7 17/11/85 SUBSYSTEM

---

*--------------------

---

FR-2-25.\B SM315 RECORDER ~TOR COOJWT (PRIMARY LOCP~ PWR> SYS

• *
• HED NJ TITLE HUIAN ENGINEERIM3 DISCREPIKY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 22Al23l8 LEGEND l£SSA6E CCMAINS JIORE TWW THREE LINES CF TEXT. KJ1AN ERROR: DELAY IN (J) RESPONSE.

/ 1H PROJll.91 DESCRIPTION: LE6END l'IESSAGE CONTAINS !()RE T~ THREE L1r£S IJ:' TEXT. 8788 PARllGRAPH NI.MBER: 6. S. 3. 3. B. 5 6. 6. 4, 2. D. 3 su;GESTED BACKFIT: USE ABBREVIATIONS TO REDUCE Tl£ UBER CF LINES [f. TEXT. fff DISPOSITION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE r<<lD II -6 81/31/86 REVIEW AND REWRITE IESSAGES -AEOO TILES AS REQUIRED FORCLARITY. LOOI< AT~ TIL ES. REFER TO PI-69 (28A82383>

• DATA cou.ECTION D£SCRIPTI0N AND CODE: NllflBER:

TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REfl.ARKS: JP-2. ITEJIIS INY(L YED 1 ~RK N.Jf!BER LOCATION C(M)l)ENT NAf£ BYP STAT LTS PERM STAT LT TRIP STAT LT ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NJT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

• tUIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CO~ 02/28/86 ASScSSIIIENT LAST R£VIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~311 A FEW l'OHESEND INDICATOR Llfi!TS DO lfJT APPARENT IEANIN6S.

tUIAN ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATION OF LIGHT JIIEANING. INCREASED REL.IKE ON ME IIJRY. fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTI~: WIPI..T 87/11/85 LISTED INDICATOR LIGHTS ARE r()T. LABELED TO EXPLAIN IEANil'E OF LIGHTS lf£N LIT. fff 87N PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.5.3.2.A.1 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: l(JDIFY LABELS TO EXPLAIN fllEANIN6 OF INDICATOR. LISHTS lffN LIT. DISPOSITI~: DELETE-THESE ARE "POWER AVAILABLE' LIGHTS AND ARE WITHir<<:l)IVENTION. I\O ~TION NE EDED

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-25-1 ITBIS INVB.',B:

-MRK OBER . LOCATION l:Oi'IPllENT NA,£ SAA125 LIGHT 6AB125 LISHT IR:125 LIGHT EAA181 LifilT AAAlll LlSHT AAA183 Llfi!T ff r()T IN INV FILE f SYSTEM CHEMICAL AND YCl.lJE CONTROL SYSTEM 0£JIIICAL AND IJCl.lDE ~TRll. SYSTEII D£111ICAL N YOUJIE CONTRll. SYSTEII SAS WASTE RADIM:TI~ SYSIDI HYDR06EN CONTAINfllENT SYSTEM HYDROOEN ~AINENT SYSIDI 2H1-214 2J1-163 2J1-2-124 H2A-6W-11M VB21138 VB 2 111 28 VB31138 VB-1-111-28 VB-2-1-29 6BB101 LIGHT HYDROSEN CONTAitfENT SYSTEM SAB111 LIGHT HYDROSEN CONTAINMENT SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM L.ETllCMN LETDCI.N L.ETDll,iW SUBSYSIDI FIRST RECORD

• SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSIDI FIRST RECORD
• IJB-2-IIJ-30 6BA183 LIGHT HYDR06EN C!l.TAINIIIENT SYSTEM
  • *
• ltJMAN EN6INEERIN6 D19:REPAN::Y REPORT 82/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPOOSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2311 A FEW fOH.ESEND INDICATOR LISHTS DO t<<lT ~VE ~RENT IJ!EANitES.

It.A ERROR: IIIISINTERPRETATI()I OF LISHT IEANHE. lfCREASED RELIArCE ()I ,IE IIIRV. fH PROBL91 IIE9:RIPTI()I: ENS II -5 ~R lfiITE N'.IN-L£6END INDICATOR LIBHT PAIRS LISTED ARE NOT LABELED TO EXPUUNINS IEAN INS CF LIGHTS WHEN UT 071!10 PARAGRAPH NU~R: 6.5.3.2.A.l SU66£STED BACKFIT: IIIODlFY LABELS TO EXPLAIN ~HE OF INDICATOR LISHTS lifiEN LIT. fH DISPOSITION: LABEL EACH LISHT TO IDENTIFY INDIVIDUAL STATUS. REFER TO PI-82 120A01101l, DATA CO..LECTI~ DESCRIPTI()I AND CODE NUMBER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJl!ARl<S: DS-25-2 ITEMS INVCl. VED: MRK NJMBER LOCATI()I CIJlllllOtENT NAPE AIIIBER STATUS WHITE STATUS ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 HNOT IN INV FILE t SYSTal SUBSYSTEM il/38/86

• *
• HED NO TITLE ENiINEERING DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODEC 22Al2312 A FEW tOH.E6END INDICATOR LIGHTS DO r<<IT APPARENT IIEANINSS.

KJilAN ERROR: NISINTERPRETATION OF LIGHT IEANIN6. INCREASBI RELIIW;E 1),1 fl>RY, 14* PROBLEM 1l£SCRIPTI~: 02/28/86 ASSES91ENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NOD III-9 97/11/85 LISTED INDICATOR LIGHTS AR£ NOT uunED TO EXPLAIN IEANIN6 OF LIGHTS WHEN LIT. 1708 PARAGRAPH NUIBER: 6. 5. 3. 2. A. 1 SUGGESTED BACl<FIT: IIIODIFY L.ABaS TO EXPLAIN IEANIN6 OF INDICATOR LISHTS WHEN LIT. 14* DISPOSITION: LABEL SPAR£ LIGHTS: "SPAR£" DATA COLLECTICW DESCRIPTICW AND CODE Nl1'1EER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE!fflRKS: DS-25-3 I TE1'S INY!l.VED: NARK NlJIIIBER LOCATION CIJlilPOf£NT FAE SYSTEJII YB SEC 2-2 ff r<<IT IN INV FILE 1 / SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• lfJl¥lN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREP!M:Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE A ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai2313 i, FEW IOH.EGEND INDICATOR LIQiTS DO l<<:IT i¥>PARENT IIEWINSS.

IAJIAf .ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATION OF LI6HT ~INS. INCREASED RELIKE IE flKIRY Ht PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: LISTED INDir.ATOR Ll6HTS AR£ rt'.IT LABELED TO EXPLAIN ~IN6 QF LlSHTS WHEN LIT. Hf 07N PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.5.3.2.A. l Sl66ESTED BACl<FIT: l(JDIFY LABELS TO EXPLAIN IEANIN6 OF INDICATOR LISHTS lfiEN LIT. )ISPOSITION: LABEL AND DE1¥1RCATE LISHTS WITH PUSHBUTTON. REFER TO LABEL STUDY PER PI-82 (i?:iAe lHU), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NUIIBER: TP-5,1 DISPLAYS SURVEY AE1¥1RKS: ns-;:'5-4 I TENS ItMl. VEr : !!ARK rt!MBER LOCATION COlflOHENT NAIE S0V-VS-li1A SOV-VS-181B SOV-vs-281P SOV-VS-281J YMMS RELAY TMeab PUSHBUTT~ TAA087 PUSHBUTTON TM088 PUSHBUTT~ SYSTEM VENTILATION SYSTEIII VENTILATI~ SYSTBI VENTILATION SYSTEM VENTILATI~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM II -5 il/38/86

• *
• TITLE HI.MAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE A 22Al231~ A FEW NON-LEGEND INDICATOR LIGHTS DO r<<JT APPARENT MEANINGS.

HUA ERROR: IUSINTERPRETATI~ Of LIGHT MEANING. INCREASED RELIAtCE ON ME MORY. Hf PROBi..01 DE&:RIPTI~: 03/03/86 ASSESS!tlENT LAST R£VIEW RESP!M,IBILITY STATUS DATE ENS JI -5 01/30/86 LISTED INDICATOR LIGHTS ARE NOT LABELED TO EXPLAIN MEANIFE LIGHTS Wl£N LIT. 0700 PARAGRAPH NI.JIIIBER: 6.5.3.2.A.1 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: l'l(JlDIFY LABELS TO EXPLAIN MEANING Of INDICATOR LISHTS WHEN LIT. DISPOSITION: ENSURE SY,C LIGHTS ON DIESEL ~s ARE LABELED "SYNC"

• DATA COLLECT!~

DESCRIPTION AND CODE N\JIIBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJl!ARKS: DS-25-5 ITEJIIS INVO...VED:

• IIAIIK N.JMBER LOCATI~ COIPCMNT NAIi£ SYSTEM J CONT PN.. ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM I
• *
• ltJMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPAHCY R£PORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2419 sal.ES PRINTED~ RECORDIN6 PAPER ARE l'()T SAt'E AS sci:u:s ON RCRDR. ENG I -2 HMlN ERROR: DELAY IN IJ> RESPCJEE.

/ Hf PROIUN DES:AIPTil)h SC$l.ES PAINTED ON RECORDitE PAPER t()T SAfE AS saus ON RCRDR. t() SC$US OR INDICATORS ON RCRDRS. (R91ARKSl 0780 PARASRAPH lt.ll'IBER: 6.5.4.1.B SUOOESTED BACl<FIT: ADD saus TO RECORDERS THAT CORRESPOND TO THE SCIUS PRINTED ON RECORDING PAPER. fff DISPOSITION: REPLACE TEXAS INSTRUMENT RCRDRS W/ RCRDRS THAT CAH BE READ ON REAL WE BASIS, S 0 OPS ~' T WAIT FOR READirES. DATA COLl.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJlmER: TP-5.l DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIV:lRKS: JP-16. PROB DESC: READINGS DELAYED 15 1mtJTES. IIDIS INVO. VED: ~AK NIJIBER LOCATl~ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII TISRAPH 1N ff t()T IN INV FILE i Vki/97/85 --~--------~--

---

* *

• HI.JIIIAN ENSINEERIN3 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY !MIT 2 CODE C 93/17/86 ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED f(J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Aa2581 DRU! CWNTER HAS IIORE T~ FOOR DIGITS AND IS f(JT 6RO.JPED.

11M ERROR: I -5 DELAY /ERROR IN OP RESP!l'&. fff PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: fff DU COLMER IIORE T~ FOUR DIGITS AND IS f(JT GRllJPED OR SEPARATED BY A COIIIA, DECIMAL POINTOR ADDIT. SPACE 8780 PARAGRAPH NJIIIBER: 6.5.5.1.A.3 SUS6£STED BACt<F IT: 6RCXJP AND SEPARATE Tl£ DI6ITS Of Tl£ DNI COUNTER BY COll'tAS, DECIIIIAL POINTS OR ADDITI~ S PACES. DISPOSITION: DECIIIIA:.. POINTS BEEN ADD'=.Jl TO BA BLENDER. OTHERS ARE WHOLE UNITS COUNTERS OR ARE r<<JT CRITICAL OR TIIIIE DEPENDENT. Ml l(;TION REQUIRED

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND COD£ NUMBER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE*IRKS: JP-17 ITEfilS I N\JOL. VED: LOCATION CIJ,IPONENT NAME SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEl'I NIS (N34) H f(JT IN INV FILE t . 93/17/86

• *
• t<<.R ENHNEERIN6 DISCR8>AHCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW HED f¥J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82582 FOR HIGH CONTRAST, BLACI< rt>>ERALS ON IIUTE DRlM SURFACE IS RECCNE IUIAN ERIKJR: DELAY IN CJ> RESPIJEE.

tH PROBLEJII DESCRIPTION: Hf lfiITE l'I.JEIR.S rM BLACK DRUM SURFOCE. 8780 PARAS~ tt>>IBER: 6. 5. 5.1.A.4 SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: CH!NJE DRIJ9S COLNTERS TO BUO< NUIERfU lfHTE BAO<SROUND SURFACE. DISPOSITION: DELETE-coNTRAST IS SOOD, COLtHERS EASILY READ. 14...SO ~TED ON VERT PNLS & COVER ED W/ 9-ASS. !RE!IIARKS> DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION~ CODE N..OOER: TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY R91ARKS: JP-18. DISP: LOSS Cf" COOTRAST DUE TO SOILING NOT A PROll.EM. ITEMS INVa.W>: ~RK l'tJIIIJIER LOCATirM cc>>fl0f£NT ,-SYSTEM SUBSYSIDI NIS (N34) H r<<lT IN INV FILE* COllll..T 16/17/85 l

• HED t() OOINEERIN6 DISCl!EPIM:Y REPORT . SURRY UNIT2 CODE TITLE !LACK ,muc LINES ~VE INCONSISTENT IEANINGS.

lUIAH ERROR: INHIBITED LEARNING. ERROR IN IP RESPONSE. lff PROllEJI DESCRIPTION: BUD IHMIC LHES REPRESENT JIIJRE T~ TYPE CF FLOW, 0700 PARAGRAPH NUl!BER: 6. 6. 6. 4. A. 1 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: REPlOCE BLACK l!IMIC LINES. USE TWO DIFFERENT LIi\£ cruJRS DISPOSITION: 02/28/86 ASSESSl£NT LAST REVIEW RESPCWSIBILITY STATUS DATE CIIIPLT 18/17/85 DEI.ETE-PN..S ARE WIDELY SEPARATED, OPS FAIIIILHH WITH l'IIl!IC l!EANirti. NO ACTI~ NEE OED

• DATA a:uECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJMBER: TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATI~ AIDS SURVEY ~RKS: DS:-59 IT01S INVCI.IJED:

IIARK 'tJIIIBER LOCATICJ4 COflPONENT NAfllE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM H N'.IT IN I~V FILE * **

• *
• ti.A ENBINEERIN6 DISCIIEPAtCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODEC ASSESSNENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al268J.

ARROl£ADS t<<lT USED TO INDICATE ,mnc FLCM DIRECTIIJE. NOD IUIAN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN CP RESPINiE. ll!ISINTERPRETATION Cf' ,muc. Ht PROll.81 DESCRIPTI~: ,mucs DO t{)T USE (DlSTit<<:TIVE) ARROlffADS TO INDICATE FLCM DIRECTI~ 8788 PARAGRAPH Nl.lf!BER:

6. 6. 6. 4, B. 3 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT:

ADD DlSTir<<:T ARIDffADS lfiERE r£CESSARY, Ht DISPOSITION: ADD ARROWHEADS AS RECCMIENDED, REFER TO PI-82 <2A1181l, DATA cw.ECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NJIIBER: TH.1 LABELS IWD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJIIARKS: DS-51 I TENS INVOLVED: MRK NJMBER LOCATION CCJmENT NAf£ SYST01 IIIIIICS H N'.IT IN INY FIL.£ t III-9 81/38/86 SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• ltJIAI ENiINEERitE DISCREPA'<<:Y REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE 82/28/86 ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<:I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A82684 SOME MIMIC DESTINATICIH/TEIMitil.

POINTS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED, llJNAN ERROR: ~Y/ERROR IN CJ) REsm.sE. fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTICIH: I V, TI£RE ARE SIJE "IMIC DESTINATICIH/TERIIIItA. POINTS THAT ARE r<<JT LABELEl> OR DO t<<JT END AT LAB El.ED IDIPOENTS. 0710 PARAGRAPH ttJMBER: 6.6.6.4,B.S SU6GESTED BACKFIT: LABEL POINTS/TERIIIINATE POINTS AT LABELL£D co,JlOrENTS. fff DISPOSITION: IJEL£TE-(J)S ARE IELL AWARE THAT TERIIIINAL POINTS ARE CONTAINIENT ATMOSPHERE, N'.I AC TICIH NEEDED, DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION f'.WD CODE rf.Jll!BER: THl,l LABELS AND LOCATICIH AIDS SURVEY REfllARKS: DS-S2 I TEJIIS I NVCl. VED: ~RK N!JflB£R LOCATION COlfll'.>>ENT NAflE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM NIMICS H NH IN INV FILE

• ta/97/85
• *
• tOIAN ENSINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2685 LS IIIATRICES OF SHULAR COflPS DO NOT LABELED COORDINATE AXES. HJIAN ERROR: DELAY IN LOCATIN6/REFEREtCIN6 A DISPLAY. / lff PR08L91 DESCRIPTION:

COO.T LISTED DISPLAY fllATRICES DO ~T HAVE LABELED COORDINATE AXES FDR AID IN LOCATING A SIMil D ISR..AY. IOARCATICl4 UN PARAGRAPH MJIIBER: 6.8.3.2.D.1 6.8.3.2.D;2 SUGGESTED BACKFIT: APPLY LABELED COORDINATE AXES TD /ti LARGE ~T MATRICES lfiERE NECESSARY. lff DISPOSITION: DELETE-STATUS LISHTS lflVE BEEN LABELED SIICE IIIOSAIC PI-OTDS WERE TAKEN

• DATA CtUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE UBER: TP-6.1 LABELS ~D LOCATION AIDS SURVEY R9IAR1<S:

DS-53 ITEJIIS INW.. YED: fllARK tt.lMBER LOCATION a:JfllPCWEHT NAIi£ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEIII fllATRICES H ~T IN INV FILE

• 98/87/85
• tUIAH ENiINEERING DISCREPAAtY REPORT SURRY 114IT 2 CODE B 83/20/86 ASSESS!'IENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al2905 llJDITDRY SIStA. EXCEEDS INTENSITY CF 91 DBIAl. tUIAN ERROR: CAN CAUSE IRRITATION TD CP£RATI!J4S PERSDtfEL.

-.. PRDBL.al DESCRIPTION: NOD HI RN6 GASEOUS EFFLUENT RAD JO SIIHIL. INTENSITY IEASURED AT 94 DBIAl. 8700 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.2.2.6.C S006ESTED ~IT: II -6 ADJUST ALRJII TO UN'-IST~Y URT/SET DPS ATTENTION. 10DBCAl ABOVE AVG AMBIENT GaERALLY AD£0ijlTE. BK6RND IRIV<l I-ff DISPOSITION: REFER TD PI-45 C28A02902l

• DATA C(l.LECTICIN DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-2.1 COMJNICATIONS SURVEY REMRKS: C-10. BKFIT: ~BIENT SHrut.D NJT EXCEED 65DB!Al. IIDIS INVCl.VED:

LOCATION CIJIIIPCWENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYST91 HI RN6 6S 11W I* NJT IN INV FILE f

• 17/11/85 I
• 1
• * ** II.A OOINEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE A ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED <<l TITLE RESPaeIBILITY STATUS DATE ----------------------

---

Wle FOR UNITS srutl Ii.IKE. ENG II -5 . IUAI ERf<<JR: COIFUSION OVER lliICH SYSTEJII/CO!flO£NT Ii.ARM IS SOI.NDIN6 FOR. tH PROlll.EN DESCRIPTION:

~IATOR ll.ARf!S FOR UNITS; AUX VENT ALARflS AND HI RNS6AS£CNJS EFFLUENT RAD O 80.N> IU KE. fJ7te PARAGRAPH IOIBER: 6,2,2,2,A SU66ESTED .BAO<FIT: TONE If' Ii.ARM ENABLING EASY DIFFERENTIATION OF SOUNDS. tH DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-85 (28Ai2106l DEi UL.ED Ar<<.t(;IATOR STUDY

• DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION AN', CODE NUIIIBER:

TP-2.1 COMJNICATIONS SU* .Jt.Y REPIARKS: C-9 IIDIS IN\/Cl. VED: MARK NUMBER LOCATION CTJIIPCM IT NAPE Ii.ARMS AUX VNT Ii.RM HI RN6 GAS£ ff t(JT IN INV FILE* ff tlr IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<: IN INV FILE

• SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII 87/11/85
• HED I'() TITLE 22Al2919 IIIPR(J)ER SETPOINT FOR iK.Afflll, ttM ERROR: ERROR IN (J) RESPONSE.

Hf PRCIIU)I DESCRIPTICl4: URI!! SETPOINT FOR RIKC-1116 1710 PA~RAPH NJMBE:R: 6. 3, 1, 2, A. 2 SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: ., . HUflll'.W EtEINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASS£SSMEN'T LAST REVIEW RE~IBILITY STATUS DATE IDPt.T 17/11/85 ENSURE ADIIIINISTRATIVE CONTROLS IN Pl.ACE AND PROC£DURES ARE FOL.LOWED Hf DISPOSITION: DEL.ETE-t()T CRDR RELATED, HEATH PHYSICS RESPONSIBILITY, DATA CCllECTI(W DESCRIPTICJ4 AND CODE UBER: TP-3,1 ANNIJIICIATOR SYSTEJ!IS REVIEW REMARKS: HR-16. WRITTEN FRI)! L.ER-81-t14/i.'31--9. ITEMS INYCl.W>: NARK NI.MBER LOCATll:W COIPOrENT ,-SYSTEJII SUBSYSTOI H r()T IN INV FILE f I .,

• *
• IUIAN EtEINEERINS D1SCR£PA.t£Y R£PORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B W28/86 ASSESSfEHT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE Wl03e34 Ilil>RCPER

~TRCl. LOCATION liA ERROR: INADVERTANT CPERATION. H+ PROBt.91 DESCRIPTION: I -2 OP OPERATED DRAIN INSTEAD OF FILL W -DRAIN W ON TOP R!M OF OORLS, FILL ()j BOTTOM. VIOL ATED OP EXPECTATI~ 17N PARAGRAPH tt.Jfl!BER: 6.8.2.2.B SU66ESTED BACKFIT: CRITICAL FIKTION -RECOMEND DREIFE TO KEY-DP£R SWTCHOO t()T RECOll£ND CHA."EIFE CONTROL LOCATI~ ff+ DISPOSITION: REARRANGE SWS SO FILL ABOVE DRN WS. !WILL l!ATCH OP EXPECTATIONS, OPS WILL OOICK LY AM>T. l IfllPROVE umELINS. DATA ct:UECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REl!ARKS: E-47. l£D WRITTEN FROI! LER REVIEW 81-03910.JL-l/9-3-81 I T9IS INYO. \JED: l!AIIK fOIBEA LOCATillil ctJIPOl£NT tfllE: t£Y-1851A I-C\'-1851B 1£V-1851C 1£V-1852A 1£1/-18528 t£1/-1852C ff l'()T IN INV FILE t ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t H l<<lT IN INV FILE t ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t H l'()T IN INV FILE t ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t SYSTBI SUBSYSTEM V!f,/U/85

• *
• ltM ENlINEERirE DISCREPAJ<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 82/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al3l35 a>>lTRn. REQUIRES 61.JARDUE IUIAN ERROR: INADVERTANT ACTIVATION.

1+1 PROIUJII DESCRIPTIOO: a>>IPLT COO'RO... WAS INADYERTANTLY ACTIVATED (SEE LERS 81-e57H~3t.--fl 19-22-81) .AND 81-0481831.--fl 17-2 7-81)) fff 8710 PARASRAPH NJfllBER: 6.4.1,2,A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: INSTALL ~TRa ~RD DISPOSITION: DELETE-B~ CONTROL WAS OPEtt:D LOCALLY. NOT WITHIN SCOPE IF CRDR. ERROR t<<lT lilADE BY CJlERATIONS PERSCHEL, DATA cou.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M>>IBER: TP-4.1 CONTRO..S SURVEY TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND vil.IDATION REJIIARKS: E-46. liRITIEH FRI)! LER 81-048/031..--fl AND 81-t7/831..--fl IIDIS INYll.UED: MRK tOIBER L.OCATI~ COIPOENT NAIE SYSTEM ll)V-2867B MJY-2867D H f()T IN ItN FILE * . H r<<lT IN INV FILE t SUBSYSTEM if:,/17/85 ' I I

• *
• ttJIIW ENSINEERHE DlSCREPAl<<:Y REPORT SURRY IJHT2 CODE 82/28/86 A5SESSIEHT LAST REVlEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 221113836 CCWTRCk.S ON BErCHl300RDS OOTSIIE Tl£ REACH rnms. K.R ERROR: lNABILITY TO RBOi NECESSARY COfTRtLS WITH EXCESSlVE EFFORT. j lff PRO!l.91 JESCRIPTION:

lff ~TIKl.S LOCATED ClJTSID£ Tl£ EXTENDED FUfCTIOfA. RElOi IF THE 5TH )TILE FEIRE AND 95TH )T ILE IR.E. 9710 PARAGRAPH tOIBER: 6.1.2.2.0.2 6.1.2.2.c

• SU66ESTED BAO<FIT: DETERMINE WHICH CONTRO..S AFFECT PUWT SAFETY AND RELOCATE TO ENSURE EASY ACCESS. DISPOSITION:

DELETE: t() PRWNi£D £PERATI(J,j lS REOOIRED OOTSIDE OF Fut<<::Tlm<<. REACH OF FIFTH PERCENTILE FEJIIAI..E FOR ~TRCk.S LISTED, DATA CCUECTIOH DESCRIPTION AND CODE rtlfl!BER: TP-1.2 ANTHROPOMETRICS SURVEY REJIIARKS: 1, 2-2. SEE WRlTTEN t£D FOR ITEMS W/OUT IIIARI< ftJIIIBERS. ITEMS INYa. \a>: ~RK fUIBER LOCATlON COIIPOtENT fM: AAB216 IETER M'.:216 METER AM217 IETER ~195 DISCRETE ROTARY ~1e6 DlSCRETE ROTARY CAB1e5 DISCRETE ROTARY AM212 ll!ETER SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM STEAfl SENERATORS 86/16/85 2-cN-P-lA 2-c:N-P-1B 2-cN-P-lC 2-CS-HA 2-CS-P-28 2-CS-P-3 2-FW-P-lAl 2-FW-P-1A2 2-RS-P-2A 2-RS-P-28 2-VP-P-JA AAB212 METER AAB108 PETER AACI08 IETER DBA111 DISCRETE ROTARY COO>ENSATE SYSTEM CCNlENSATE SYSTEM CIMENSATE SYSTEM aJfTAll'fENT SPRAY SYSTEM CCJffAINENT SPRAY SYSTEJII CllfTAiltENT SPRAY SYSTEM FEEDWATER SYSTEM FEEDWATER SYSIDI CONTAINENT RECIRCULATIN6 SPRAY SYSIDI ~TAift£NT RECIRCUI..ATI1'<<3 SPRAY SYSTEM VACWI PRIIIII"1i (WATER SID£> SYSTEJII STEAfl GENERATORS SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD Et.6INEERIN6 DISCREPAN:Y REPORT 02/28/86

• SURRY LINIT2 tEl NO: 22A83136 IT01S INVCI.YED:

MAK NJIIIBER LOCATif .ft C(N)(JEHT NA1E SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ---2"."YP-P-38 DBA1i3 DISCRETE ROTARY WKllJfl PRifllitfJ (WATER SIDE> SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD ACB-2512 CM.22 DISCRETE ROTARY SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD ~B-25B2 CW2.23 DISCRETE ROTARY SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD ACB-25C2 cr~4 DISCRETE ROTARY SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD N L£FT BD ff NClT IN INV FILE t ANN LFT BD RSET ff NClT IN INV FILE 1 ANH RT BD ff NClT IN INV FILE t ANN RT BD RESET ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 N RT BD TEST ff NOT IN INV FILE I AUT-STRT O P'i ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 C. L. S. ACT~T'4 ff NClT IN INV FILE t CLS RESET TR A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 Cl.S RESET TP B ff NClT IN INV FILE I CRT DISP CT'rll.. ff NClT IN INV FILE 1 CS-25-al2 DAA222 DISCRETE ROTARY CS-25-25B2 DAA223 DISCRETE ROTARY CS-25-25( *~ IlM224 DISCRETE ROTARY CS-25-62'42 DAB224 DISCRETE ROTARY

• CS-25-v:T557 DAA225 DISCRETE ROTARY DELTAT DEFEAT ff NClT IN INV FILE 1 FCV-2lee.

RAA914 PROCESS CONTROU.ER CHEMI~ AND VCUJIE CONTROi. SYSTEM CHARGING FCV-2o85 BAA117 PROCESS COOR<LLER RESIDUAL tEAT REl<<ML SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD FCV-~-28i!A BAA215 DISCRETE ROTARY AUXILIARY STEAM SYSTEfll ISCLATION VALVES FCV P-3-2188 BAB215 DISCRETE ROTARY AUXILIARY ST£AIII SYSTEM ISOUITION VALVES FC\ *SV-28i!A BAA216 CIRCUIT BREAKER fl!AIN STEAM SYSTEM IS(LATION VALVES FC\-SV-288B BAB216 DISCRETE ROTARY l'IAIN STEAi!! SYSTEM ISOLATION VAi.YES FI IE E,!F.,RSEl<<:Y ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t 6El'H1SDil HNOT IN INV FILE 1 SEN-tJ;DP H r<<JT IN INV FILE t HCV-2,42 DAA116 PROCESS ~TR<LLER RESIDUAL HEAT R9IOVll. SYST01 1£V-,:2NA CBA127 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct9Ir.AL AND VCl.lllE CONTRCl. SYSTEM ISCl.ATION Wt.VES tCV-!2818 .ceA128 DISCRETE ROTARY DEMir.AL AND VIX.UIE ~TRCl. SYSTEM ISClATION VALVES HCY*2280C CBA129 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct9Ir.AL AND VIX.LJIE CONTRGL. SYSTEM IS(LATION VI\.VES l(:V-2201 CBA123 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEJl!Ir.AL AND '.U..UIE COORCl. SYSTEM ISClATION VALVES 1£\1~1 CBA126 DISCRETE ROTARY 0£fl!lr.AL AN> VO.LJIE CONTRO.. SYSTEM ISCLATION VI\.VES ocv-23*1 CM123 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct£llllr.AL AND VILUIE COORCl. SYSTEM 1soum~ VALVES 1£V-221l CAA124 DISCRETE ROTARY D£111Ir.AL AND Vll.lJIE COO-RO.. SYSTEM ISCLATION VALVES 1£V-2' 44 CM125 DISCRETE ROTARY D£1lll~ AND VOLUIE COORCl. SYSTEM ISCl.ATI~ VAL YES HCY-f:556A H NClT IN INV FILE t ICY-~'55&8 CAA126 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct9Ir.AL AND VCUJIE CONTRll. SYSTEM ISCLATION VI\.VES HCV* 2556C CAA127 DISCREiE ROTARY CH01Ir.AL AND VIX.UIE ~TRCl. SYSTEM InATION VALVES IC\-~7A CBA124 DISCRETE ROTARY Ct£ll!ICAI.. AND VCl.lJE CONTRO.. SYSTEM ISOJ!TION Wt.VES HCV-2557B CBA125 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEMICAL AND VOUJIE. ~TRCl. SYSTEM I SClATION VALVES

• 1£Y-2".57C CBB125 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEMICAL AND VCl.lJIE CONTRCl. SYSTEM ISCLATION VI\.VES HCV-2/58 DAA115 PROCESS aJffRCl.LER RESIIXR. HEAT R9IOVIL SYSTBI SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD . 1£Y-'i5-2M CAB213 PROCESS CONTROLLER IIV!IN STEAM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM FIRST RECORD HI S'OI FLO TR A HNOT IN INV FILE 1 ti.MN EHSINEERINS DISCREPAi'CY REPORT 02/28/86
• SURRY UNIT2 l£D r() I 22A8J836 ITEMS INV!l.YED:

!!ARK IUEER LOCATION C()IP(JENT ,-SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII HI STM FLO TR B ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ t HIC-CV-218 DAA114 PROCESS CIJHRCUER ~TAINENT VACUlJII SYSTBI INT Rti6 TRP TRA ff t()T IN INV FIL£ t INT RfE TRP TRB ff NOT IN INV FIL£* U:V-2461A CAA128 DISCRETE ROTARY Cle!ICR.. VOllJE: CONTIHl. SYSTEJII ISCLATIOH WI.YES LCV-2468B CAA129 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEMI~ VClUIE ~TIHl. SYSTEM ISll.ATI~. VALVES LO PRZR PR TR A ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ t LO TAVG TR A ff NOT IN INV FILE* LO TAV6 TR B ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t LVL SI ACT TR A HNOT IN INV FILE* 111(-\.P IIKlD£ CTRL ff NOT IN INV FIL£+ IIOJ 2842 ff NOT IN INV FIL£* ,OV 2867 A ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£ t IIIOV 2867 B ff NOT IN INV FILE* 111V 2B67 C ff NOT IN INV FIL£ f l<<lV 2867 D ff NOT IN INV FILE* lllV 2B69 A ff t<<lT IN INV FIL£*

• l<<lV 2869 B ff NOT IN'INV FILE* ll'.IV-2585 DAA118 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR COil.ANT (PRIMARY LOOP, PWRl SYS ISOLATION VALVES l<<lV-2586 DAB118 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR coa.ANT !PRIMARY LCXJP, PWRl SYS I SOLATI VALVES ,OV-2587 DAA119 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR coo.ANT CPRil!ARY LOOP, PWRl SYS ISOLATION WI.YES flEY-2598 CAA118 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR COOUfH <PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR) SYS I SOLATI VALVES IIJY--2592 SAB118 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR COCLANT (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS ISOLATION VALVES fl!OV-2594 CAA119 DISCRETE ROTARY REACTOR COOLANT (PRil'IARY LOOP, PWR> SYS SUBSYST91 FIRST RECORD ,OV-CS-201A ff NOT IN INV FILE t MOV-CS-2t1B DAA1"9 DISCRETE ROTARY ~TAifflENT SPRAY SYSTEII fOV-CS-201C ff MJT IN INV FILE t l<<lV-CS-2010 DAA110 DISCRETE ROTARY ~TAINIENT SPRAY SYSTBI ,OV-CS-202-B CAA107 DISCRETE ROTARY CONTAINIENT SPRAY SYSTEM l<<lV-cs-202A ff hOT IN INV FILE* KIV-FW-258A CM:!14 DISCRETE ROTARY FE.EDWATER SYSTEJII ISll.ATIOH WI.YES l<<lV-FW-2508 CAB214 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISOLATI~ YALYES IIJV-FW-2:51A CAA216 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISOLATIIJI WI.YES fOV-FW-251 B DM216 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEIII I SOLATI VALVES fOV-FW-2:SlC CAB215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISOLATIOH Wl.VES KlV-FW-251D DAB215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTE/4 I Sll.ATI~ VALUES lllV-FW-2:51E CAA215 DISCRETE ROTARY FE.EDWATER SYSTEM ISWITIIJI WI.YES KlV-FW-251F DAA215 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEJII ISll.ATI~

VALVES lllV-fW-254A DAA212 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM ISOLATI~ Wl.VES l<<)V-FW-254B DAB212 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEJII ISOLATI VAL YES l()V-fw-2:54C DAA213 DISCRETE ROTARY FEEDWATER SYSTEJII ISOLATIIJI WI. YES IIIOV-RS-256A ff NOT IN INV FILE* fOV-RS-2:SGB ff MJT IN INV FILE t * "'1V-SW-284A DAA111 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTBI fOV-SW-204B DAB111 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM l!IOV-SW-264C DAA112 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTBI *,ov-sw-2040 BM113 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM -i EtEINEERIN3 DISCREPAr<<:Y REPORT 02/28/86 ,. SURRY UNIT2 HED NO: 22A83836 ITEJIIS IfMl. YED: IIARK ttJIIIBER UJCATICJI COIPONEHT NAf!E SYSIDI SUBSYSTEM IIIV-~26 r.AA111 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEJII IIJIJ-~2158 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 IIIV-SW-28SC CM112 DISCRETE ROTARY , SERVICE WATER SYSIDI IIJIJ-5W-285[) CM113 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEII lllY-sw-ce6A DBB111 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM ~~2968 DBA112 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEJII OCB-{;282 CAB224 DISCRETE ROTARY OCB-62TS57 CAA225 *ll!ETER PCV-2455A DAA121 PROCESS COHTROlLER REACTOR coo.ANT (PRIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS PCV-24SSB DAA122 PROCESS ~TROLLER REACTOR axLANT (PRIMARY LCKJ), PWR> SYS PCV-CV-201B ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PCV-SV-20IA ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PRZR NSTR PRESS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 PRZR SEL SWITCH ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 PW RN6 TRIP TRA ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 PW RN3 TRIP TRB ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RBl:TOR TRIP ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 RMT REFUEL ff NOT IN INV FILE 1

• RTM SYS TR A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 AV-NS-201A CM211 PROCESS CONTROlLER fllAIN.STEAfl SYSTEJll ATIIOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVES RV-f!S-211B CAA212 PROCESS ~TROLLER ~IN STE~ SYSTEM ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVES AV-fl!S-201C CAB212 PROCESS CONTRCUER fllAIN STEAfl SYSTEM ATIIJSPHERIC RELIEF VALVES RX TRIP, RESET ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SI ACT~TION ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SI RESET TR A ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SI RESET, TR B ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-2NA1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 S0Y-RC-200A2 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-200Bl ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-20082 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 S0V-RC-201Al . ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 S0V-RC-201A2 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-201Bl ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SOV-RC-20182 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE* SR TRIP TRA ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SR TRIP TRB ff NOT IN INV FILE* I TAVE DEFEAT ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TESTANI LFT BD ff NOT IN INV FILE* TR A RESET ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TR B LO PRZR PR ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TR B LYL SI ACT ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TR B RESET ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 TURB-DC ECP ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-DA203B DBA102 DISCRETE ROTARY DRAINS (AERATED>

SYSTEM

• TV-6W-211A ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-GW-211B ff NOT IN INV FILE* TV-GW-212A ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 EttiINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT
• SURRY UNIT2 l£D I'(): 22A83836 *
• ITEMS INYll.YED: ,w:i~ N.MBER LOCATI~ COf!PClfENT

,-SYSTEM 1V-GW-212B 1V-fllS-2elA 1V-fllS-2elB 1V-fllS-2elC ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 DAA210 DISCRETE ROTARY flW:\IN STEAi'! SYSTEM DAB210 DISCRETE ROTARY l!!AIN STEAIII SYSTEJII DAA211 DISCRETE ROTARY l'.AIN STEAM SYSTEM 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEM

• * ** HlM OOINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT . SURRY l.tHT2 CODE A HED NO TITLE 22A13137 CCMROLS WITHIN 3 ItOIES Cf FRONT EDGE Cf CCMnE, ERROR: la:IDENTll.

~TIYATI!li OF CONTROLS. lff PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: COO'Rll.S ARE WITHIN 3" Of FR!liT EDGE IF CONSOlf. 07~ PARAGRAPH UBER: 6.1. 2. 2. D.1 SLESESTED BACKFIT: ATTACH. 61.JARDRAIL AROOND BB, INSTIU GUARDS OR PROVIDE INTERLOCKS. lff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-56 (20Ai3007l. INSTALL A GUARD RAIL

• DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE UBER: TP-1.2 ANTHRCPMTRICS SURVEY REJIIARKS: 1.2-1 I TEJIIS I NVCl. YED : ~RK NUflBER LOCATION roilPClfENT t9IE SYSTEfil 2-SH>-leA 2-SW-P-198 IOY-cP-20@ l<<M.CV-2115B KIVL.CV-21 lSD l!KlYLCV-211 SE S0Y-SI-282A2 SOY-SI-28282 14IB125 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM lflA126 DISCRETE ROTARY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM ~11 DISCRETE ROTARY ff l<<lT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN Il'lv FILE 1 ff NOT IN Il'lv FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE* e2/2S/86 ASSESSIEHT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS SUBSYSTEJII ~RSIN6 CHARGINS II -5 87/11/85 51.JBSYSTEJII FIRST RECORD

• *
• Ht.WIN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE C ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A93838 C(J(TRCJ.S ON VERT BOARD OOTSIDE ~.INIU AND IIIAXIMUM VIEWitE HEI6HTS ttMH ERROf<: DELAY IN CPERATOR RESPONSE.

"* PROIIL9I ~SCRIPTI~: CTRLS ARE LOER THAN l'IIN RECOVENDED t£I6HT !34") 0700 r.iARAG~ NIJl!BER: 6, 1, 2. 5. A SW .iESTED BACKFIT: EN6 RELOCATE COOTROLS TO BE WITHIN RECOfflllENDED RAIG OF 34" AND 70" ABOVE FLOOR. :JISPOSITION: NRV-f11S-211A1B/C, PICJS r()N RETURN WS -RELOCATE lP ON BOARD. COORDINATE WITH PI-6 H!~l

• DATA COLI.£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE M..11&:R:

TP-1.2 ANTHRIJOETRICS SURVEY R91ARKS: 1,2-3 I IDIS Il'Ml. i.e: JIIARK IOIBER LOCATION COPIPOrENT NRV-""5-201A NRV-f11S-2l1B NRV-fllS-201C ff MJT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII III-8 V/6/97/85

• *
• tlWW EN61NE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSE:SSIENT LAST REVIEW HED t(J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A83M8 KEY SWITCH VERTICSl.

POSITION OOES NOT INDICATE CFF OR SAFE. COO.T HJA( ERROR: INCORRECT SWITCH ORIENTATION OR VALi£ JIIA\' RESll.T. fff PRO!L9I DESCRIPTION: KEY-a>ERATED LOCKS ARE NOT ORIENTED SO T~T THE SWITCH IS !FF OR SAFE lffN THE KEY IS IN T~ VERTICSl. POSITID't. 17i0 PAROORAPH N..JPIBER:

6. 4. 4. 3 SUGGESTED BACl<F IT: RE-ORIENT SWITCHES SO THAT OFF OR SAfE IS VERTICAL, PROVIDE LABEL TO INDICATE CORRECT KEY SWITCH POSITION, 144 DISPOSITION:

ll.L ITEMS W/ POSTNS r()T Cl.EARL\' IIIAR1<£D ADDRESSED IN VD15!23A03211l. ITEMS LISTED -DELETE-POSTNS CLEARLY l'IARKED

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION CODE NUMBER:
• TP-4. 1 ~TROLS SURVEY REIIIARl<S:

4. l-1, 0700 8DL£ SH!llD READ:6. 4. 4. 3D !BOTH SWS ON EHC TURB> IIDIS INVCl. ~: IIIARI< ttJIIIBER LOCATION COOJENT ,-IIIAINT TEST OVSPO PROT ff r()T IN INV FILE t ff t<<lT IN INV FILE* SYSTEM SUBS\'ST01 16/16/85

• *
• tiJIAN OOINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE A TITLE .22AIJ841 r<<l INDICATI~

CF ACTI.Jl'.l. Vil.VE POSITIIJE. tUIAN ERROR: "ISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAY INFO, EQUIPl'IENT STATUS. Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSIIIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE II -5 @6/07/85 ~TUAL VALVE POSITIONS ARE r()T INDICATED. ~TlA. INDICATIONS IO.LD PREVENT A LOT CF TRIPS. 0700 PARAGRAPH NI.Ml£R: 6.5.1.1.E.2 Sl.66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE INDICATION IF ACTUAL ~VE STATUS. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-108 (20801184, 1106, 101871 DATA ro.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY REJl!ARKS: P.9.2-:-13 ITEMS INYll. VED: MRK NUMBER LOCATION CCJflONEkT NAf£ FL EVAP PR FW BYP WS fW FD SYS PRZR SPRA W S6 BYP WS H r<<JT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN ItN FILE t H r()T IN ItN FILE t HNOT IN ItN FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t SYSTEJII ' SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HlJWW EIEINE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al385i AR!Oi!S PUSHBUTI!lE BEEN RUBBED OFF. tUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE.

1H PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: NOD II -7 ARRM SOIE PUSHBUTIONS .B£EN RUBBED CH lfiICH REDlCES CERTAINTY OF SEL£CTIN6 CORRE CT SWITCH DIRECTION, fH 0780 PARAS~ NU"8ER: 6.4.4.4 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: REPLAC£ PBS WITH ONES THAT HAVE ARROWS CLEARLY DEFINED OR REPAINT ARROWS ON CURRENT BUTION s. DISPOSITION: REPLll BUTIONS ON IU SUDi COIIIPONtNTS AS REllUIRED. ACCOO..ISH IN CONJI.Jt£TION W/ MODIFICATIONS IN C-12 (~9 DATA COL.LECTION DESCRIPTION CODE IUIBER: TP-4.1 ~ROLS SURVEY ~RKS: C-15, 10700 6UIDEL1t-£ StfilD READ: 644-4Bl ITEMS INVOL. VED: ~RK ruBER LOCATION COIIIPOt£NT NAI£ SYSTE/11 SUBSYSTEJII FCV 111AN CTRL ff NlT IN INV FILE * ! 07/11/85

• *
• It.DIAN ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODEC HED NO TITLE 22AIJa54 ~TR!ll VERT BOARD WTSIDE IIIINIU AND JIIAXIIIUI VIEWING 1£I9ffS H.JlllN ERROR: DELAY IN IP RESPONSE.

fff PROBt.al DESCRIPTI~: CTILS ARE HIIHR Tt91 JIIAX RECCMNDED 1£16HT OF 78* <FIOI FLOOR). a1ae PARAGRAPH NI.JIIIBER: 6.1.2.5.A SU36ESTED BACKFIT: ec!/28/86 ASSESSIENT ~T REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NOD III-8 ~/17/85 RELOCATE CONTROLS TO BE WITHIN RECOflll'IENDED RArEE OF 34" AND 70 1 ABOVE FLOOR. fff DISPOSITION: STEP LADDER HAS BEEN PROVIDED

• DATA ClllECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-1.2 ANTHRCJPOIIIETRICS SURVEY REJ!IARKS:

1.2-3 ITEMS INVCLVED: JIIARK 101B£R UJCATI~ mlPIHNT NAfE PRZR SFTY W TR A ff r<<JT IN INV FILE

• ff t<<lT IN INV FILE
• SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII
• tt.ww EtfiINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 82/28/86 ASSESS,1£NT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY . STATUS DATE 22A83864 aMID.S VERT DIRD ll.JTSIDE IUNIIUI AND IIAXIO VIEWitE HEIGHTS 11.R Ef:AOR: DEl AY IN !P RESPONSE.

1+1 PRDBl:.:fll DESCRIPTI~: fff f,TRL.S ARE LllER THAN ,iIN RECDIENDED t£I6HT (34 8). 87'.t PARA61ti¥lti NIJ!BER: 6.1.2.5.A Ft.166ESTED BACKFIT: RELOCATE CONTROLS TD BE WITHIN RECflllllENDED RA& OF 34" AND 78" ABOVE FLOOR. DISPOSITION:

• CTRLS ARE FOLH) TO BE WITHIN RECOMEND*D RAf\EE/BEitE RElllVED F~ CR/NOT FREOOEN TLY USE. t<<l ACTION. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NJIBER: TP-1.2 ANTHRIJICJIETRICS SURVEY REJIIARKS:

1. 2-313) I1DS INVCl.i.tD:

flARK NUfllBER t.OCATIIJ4 IDIPONENT NA,£ SYST01 fCY-CC-213A FCV-CC-2138 FCV-ES-215 FCV-ES-2t7A FCV-£S-208A ~-2267~ ll!CIY-2267-B ~-2269~ l(JV-2269-B LM489 DISCRETE ROTARY t£UTl!Ot SHIELD TAN< AND COO.INS SYSTEl4 .* t'IOV-2278~ -. l'IOV-2270-B UABm DISCRETE ROTAR, NEUTROO SHIELD TANK AND COO.INS SYSTBI ff r()T IN INV :=ILE

• ff NOT IN INY FILE* HNOT IN IN' FILE* ff NOT IN I~J FILE* .H r()T IN I N FILE
• H NOT IN l N FILE t HNOT IN .NY FILE* ff NOT IN NV FILE t H NOT Ir-.t >N FILE t SUBSYSTEM CQllllt.T 87/15/85
• *
• HED NO: 22A93864 IT01S INYCl. VED: HU~ El\6IN££RING D1SCR£PAt£Y REPOflT SURRY UN!T2 IIIARK N.IMBER LOCATION COP1PONENT NAI£ SYSIDI l()V-2275-A ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 IIIOV-2275-B ff NOT IN IN\/ FILE 1 KIV-2275-C ff NOT IN INV FILE* i lllV-ES-2'0 ff t(IT IN IN\/ FILE 1 IIJHS-22 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 l()V-ES-58 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 l()IJ-£9-67 ff t<<JT IN IN\/ FILE 1 JIIOV-ES-85 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 l()V-ES-95 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 TV-SV-202 ff NOT IN. INV FILE 1 TV-SV-203 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ~/28/86 SUBSYSTEM
• *
• HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSl'IENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A03e65 ~TROLS NEEDED IN Tl£ CR. ERROR: IIISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED INFO. FAIWRE TO DETECT ABMJR M. ~ITI~. Kl PROa..91 DESCRIPTION:

fff CONTROLS LISTED NEEDED IN CR. 8700 PARAGRAPH NUfllBER: f>, l, 1, 1,A SUGGESTED .BACKF IT: PROVIDE CONTROLS NEEDED BY OPS. DISPOSITION: NONE REFER PI-77 (20A02005l. NOTE: CTRL SW FOR FW RECIRC WS IS REFERRED TO PH03 12 ~3061) DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUfllBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION ~RKS: P.9.2-1 ITEJIIS I NYll. YED: -!ARK MJMBER LOCATION CCJMPOtefl CR 0l£R VENT FW RECIRC W l!l)Y SHI TR V ff NOT IN IN\J FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM COO.T 07/15/85

• • *
• HUriAN E~INEERil\6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT SURRY ~IT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASS£SS!'E.~T LAST R£YlEW HED t<<:I TITLE RESPONSIBH.ITY STATUS DATE 22Ai3866 ~TROLS NEEDED IN CR TO BRING PUlNT TO su:E SHUTDClilN.

11M ERROR: IIIISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED INFORIIIATION. FAILURE TO DETEC T ABNl!M.. CONDITIOO. fff PROaal DESCRIPTION: NONE COMPLT CPS REPORTED CONTROLS LISTED ARE NEEDED IN CR TO BRUE MT TO A SAFE SHUTDO.w CONDITION. 071N PARAGRAPH NUIIIBER: 6.1, 1, 1.A SU36ESTED BACKF IT: PROVIDE CONTROLS r£EDED BY OPS. fff DISPOSITION: SEE PI-77 (20A02005>. MJTE: REFER TO PI-103 (2~1202) FOR CROSS CONN::CT FOR CTM T & IA SYSTEIIS

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUIIIBER:

TP-9,2 IJERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS: P.9.2-3 ITOO INV0..i.£Ih !'.ARK tUIBER LOCATION COPIPOt£NT CRS Clll M STM Lit£ STM !Sil. TURB DRV ff r<<JT IN INV FILE -t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NlT IN INV FILE -t ff NOT IN INV FILE t SYSTE/11 SUBSYSTEl4 07/15/85

• *
• HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPCRT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSl'!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ai3191 It<<:OOISTENT OPEN AND .CLOSE POSITI~ LABELS ON PROCESS CONTROLLERS IUIAH ERROR: NISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAY 1'*0, EOOIPIIENT STATUS, fff PROILal DESCRIPTION:

ENS II -6 TENP LABLS INDIC OPEN/CLOSE AT 0/1~ BASED ON lilW INSTRFAILS. OPEN/CLOSE "13T CONSISTENT A T 011*, cort=USING. 1790 PARAGRAPH tuBER: 6.5.1,1,E,2 !Ui6ESTED BACl<F IT: PROVIDE PERMANENT LABas THAT ADEQUATELY DESCRIBE THAT THE VALUES ARE BASED ON INSTRUl'IENT FAILURES. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO LABEL!Ni STUDY PER Pl-82 (20A01101l

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ NUMBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE!flRKS:

P .. 9,2-H ITEJIIS I tMl. lJED: ~AK IUEER LOCATION CClflPOt£NT NAIii£ PROCE:SS CONT ff t()T IN INV FILE t SYST£l'II SUBSYSTEM I 07/11/85

• *
• HIJ'1AN EN6INERI1f3 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNI T2 CODE C ASS£SSPENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A03283 KNOB POINTER NOT CLOSE TO CORRESPOOJING SCf-A.ES, PARIUAX POSSIBLE, ttJ!IIAN ERROR: ERROR IN OPERATOR R£SP0NS£.

"* PROll.91 DESCRIPTION: NOD III-9 KNOB POINTER t<<JT l(JlMED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PANELSCALES TO WHICH THEY POINT. PARRAL LAX MAY OCCUR. 0700 PARAGRAPH MJJIIBER: 6.4.4.5.D.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: USE A POINTER ON THE C ,NTROL WHICH IS CLOSE TO THE SCAL£TO WHICH IT POINTS. "* DISPOSITION: POS WHICH f il USES SW !DIRECTLY IN FRONT), NO PROB W/ PARALLAX. OPS FAPIILIAR W/ S W, REPORT (] PRO!ll91. NO ACTION

• DATA C0LL£CiI0N lltSCRIPTION CODE M.JP!BER:

TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY R91AR'.S: 1.1-2* IT96 INV0-1.iED: MARK tUIR .R LOCATION COMPOt,ENT NAIE 1/TJll-408 FAB289 DISCRETE ROTARY SYSTE/11 EL£CT~YDRAULICS CONTROLS SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 06/07/85

• *
• HOOlN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 COD£ A 02/28/86 ASSESSAENT

.AST REVIEW HED Ml TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A832t6 LACK IF FEEDBAO< INDICATil'E PROCESS/DIRECTION OF PARiVETERCHANGE.

tUIAN ERROR: D£1.AY/ERROR IN IP RESPOEE. fff PROIUJI DESCRIPTION: ENG I -1 TIIE LAS BET CTRL. ACTIVATION & l1. TI~TE SYS STATE & I'() IIIIAED FEEDBACK INDICATINS PROCESS & t DIRECT IF PARAIII DNx 8788 PARAGRAPH NU"8ER: 6. 9.3.1. c. 2* SU66ESTED BACKFIT: EN6INEERIN6 EVALUATION TO IMPL£111ENT SO,i£ IMi.EDIATE FEEDBACK TO OPERATOR.

• • • DISPOSITION:

REFER TO PI-77-59 (20A02045l

• DATA IXUECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ NINER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RalARKS: c-20-1 ITBIS INYll.VED:

fARK rtlflBER LOCATION COlflONENT SYSTEM PCY-2455A PCY-24558 IIAA121 PROCESS CONTROLLER REACTOR COil.ANT (PRil'IARY LOOP, PWRl SYS IIAA122 PROCESS CONTRCl.1.ER REACTOR COOU~H (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWRl SYS SUBSYSIDI 07 /1.1/85

• *
• HUl".AN EN6INEERI/'c6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ~/28/86 ASSESSP!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSiBILITY STATUS DATE 22A032e7 KEYS W/ SltaE FIOW Of TEETH DO NOT POINT UP OR FORWARD. NONE II -7 11M ERROR: DELAY IN IJ> RESPONSE.

I fff PR1lBt.£111 DESCRIPTION: ~L SiraE ROW KEYS ~KEY OPERATED CTRLSJ DO f()T POINT UPOR FORWARD. KEY IS INSERTED WITH T EETH POINTING 00,jN, fff 0700 PARAGRAPH tt!MBER: Ei.4.4.3 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: RE-ORIENT t<EY-DPERATED CONTROLS TO ACCEPT KEYS WITH SIN6LE ROW Of' TEETH POINTING UP OR FOR WARD. DISPOSITION: KEY IJ>ERATED SWITCHES ARE NOT THIE CRITICAL AND CANNOT BE: INSERTED INCORRECTLY. NO OCTI~ REQUIRED, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NI.JIIIBER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY ~RKS: C-21. (0700 6UID8.INE SHLllD READ: 6443B) I TENS INVCL VED: ~RK NlJIIIBER LOCATION COfllPONENT NAIIIE SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEJ!I SNli. ROW KEY HNOT IN INV FIL.£* 01/3"/86

• *
• HED f(} TITLE HUP!AN EN6IN£ERI1'6 DISCR£PANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B cnmn. POSITIO'e ON KEY-<JPERATED CCNTRG..S ARE f(}T LABELLED.

tlWlN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN OP£RATOR RESP(NjE. t+t PROIUJII DESCRIPTI~: CONTRCX.. POSITIONS AR£ DIFFICll.T TO DETERMINE lffN KEY ISREMOVED. 0700 PARAGRAPH ~BER: 6.4.4.3 SLGGESTED BACKFIT: PtRJI.AfaTLY LABEL crnlPONENT ABOVE POSITIONS RAtiTER THAN BEL~. tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO VD-15-1 (23A83210)

• DATA CCUECTION DESCRIPTION CODE NUMBER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY Ra!ARKS: C-22. (0700 SUI DELINE SHO.LD READ: 6. 4. 4. 3F > I IDIS I NVCl. lJED: -fllARK N.JfllER LOCATION COMPOtENT NAIIIE SYSTEM t<EY CP CTRI..S ff f(}T IN INV FILE + 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NOD II -6 07/11/85 SUBSYSTEM
• HED r<<J 22A8321S 1'1RROR IMA6ED Cllll9ENTS. ERROR: TITLE iUIAN ENSINEERIM3 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B SELECTINi WRCN3 CONTROL. INCREASED SEARCH THIE. Hf PROl:ll.BI DESCRIPTION:

Tl-£ LISTED CONTROLS ARE IIIRROR IPIASED WITHIN EACH LISTED SRCU>. 17e0 PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.8.2.3.B Sl66ESTED BACKFIT: 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENG II -7 07ill/85 SWTICH LOCS OF 1-YS-f'-42/41 OR LOCS (f' 2-VS-f'-41/42. SWITCH LOCS OF 1-YS-f'-104B/A OR LOCS OF 2-YS-184A/B, fff DISPOSITI()t: REFER TO PI-19 (22f23@26) !VENT PNL) AND PI-117-3 (20003e16J, DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTill'i AND CODE NlJIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND YALIDATION TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY REMARKS: DS-28 IIDIS I NYCl. lJED: ~RK N.Jfll£R LOCATION COIPOHENT 1-YS-llMA 1-YS-1148 1-YS-f'-41 l-YS-f'-42 2-VS-114A 2-VS-114B. 2-YS-f'-41 2-VS-f'-42 WAB046 DISCRETE ROTARY WAAe46 DISCRETE ROTARY XMM& DISCRETE ROTARY*. XABl45 DISCRETE ROTARY WAA047 DISCRETE ROTARY WMl48 DISCRETE ROTARY XAAi47 DISCRETE ROTARY XAAl48 DISCRETE ROTARY SYSTEM VENTILATION SYSTEIII VENTILATI~ SYSTEM VENTILATION SYSTEf!I VENTILATIO'i SYSTEM VENTILATION SYSTEf!I VENTILATI~ SYSTEM VENTILATION SYSTEJII VENTILATI~ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII

• *
• liJ~ ENSINEERI"6 DISCREPANCY REilORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSJIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A83216 LACI( OF FEEDBACK INDICAT".l-3 PROCESS/DIRECTION OF PARA.IIETER ClilNGE. tU!AN ERROR: DELAY /ERROR IN OP RES:-JQNSE.

Hi PRO!l.9! DESCRIPTION: ENG II -6 WE LAS BET CTR!. i:t:TIYATION & LL TIIIIATE SYS STATE I Ml !MED FEEDBACK INDICATING PROCESS & DIRECT OF PA~ D.HGE 071le PARAS~ NUJIBER: 6.9.3.1.C SU66ESTED BACKi 1T: EHSINEERINt; EVALUATION TO IJIIPLEl'IENT SOPIE IflfflEDIATE FEEDBACK TO OPERATOR. Hi DISPOSITION: REFER T'J PI-77-!1-S6l (20A02005l DATA COUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE Nl.JIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMhRl{S: C-..20-2 IT91S IN' /Cl. VED: IIARK N!.f !1£R

• LOCATION COfllPONENT SYSTEM SIJBSYSTEPI ff NlT IN INV FILE t / 07/11/85
• * * *HlJPIAN EN6INEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A03217 LID< CF FEEDBACK INDICATIN6 PROCESS/DIRECTION OF PARAMETER CHANGE, ttJIIIAN ERROR: DELAY/ERROR IN OP RESPONSE.

Ht PROll.Efil DESCRIPTION: ENG I -5 TIIE LAS BET CTRL OCTIVATIDN & ll.TI~TE SYS STATE & r() !IVIED FEEDBACK INDICATING PROCESS & DIRECT CF PARAI!! 8718 PARAGRAPH NUIIIBER: 6.9.3,1.C SU66ESTED BACKf'IT:

• EN6INEERIN6 EViK..UATION TO ll'IPLEJIIENT srnE Il'IIEDIATE FEEDBACK TO OPERATOR, Ht DISPOSITION:

REFER TO PI-n-57 (20A02043l, DATA Cll.J.ECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION R91ARKS: C-20-3 ITEJIIS I NIJ[l. VEDi IARK NJIIIBER LOCATIOH CCJllilOt£NT ,-t£V-155A HCV-1558 t£V-l55C ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff t{IT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 07/11/85

• *
• ENGINEERINB DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE C 02/28/86 ASSESSP1£NT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A83483 IESSA6ES PUSHllJTTON CONTAIN IIORE T~ 3 LINERS OF LETTERING.

ENG It.A ERROR: DEUIY IN OP RESP<IEE. fff PR011t.91 ll*SCRIPTION: IE~ ON LEGEND PUSHBUTIONS CONTAIN l()RE THAN 3 LINES If' LETTERINB. fff 0709 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER:

6. 4. 3. 3. s. 5 Sl.66ESTED BAO{FlT: THREE LINES OF LETIERIN6 OR LESS SHOULD BE USED TO IDENTIFY .BUTTON. DISPOSITION:

CRT CTRL PB IN LABELIN6 STUDY (20A0110ll. UPPER EHC TURB PNL BEIN6 REMOVED (29A0 3845). ABBREV: "OVSP PROT CNTRL 1 DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUJIIBER: TP-4,1 CONTROLS SURVEY REMRKS: 4.1-4. REDUCE ALL IESSA6£S TO 3 LIIES OR LESS. I IDIS INIJCl YED: MRK fUIBER LOCATION COlflllfENT rf:lNE SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEJII H ~T IN INV FILE 1 IIl-9 01/30/86

• *
• H.JA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE C ASSESSIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Ae3404 LESEND PUSHBUTTONS NOT READABLE UNDER ANY ILLlJIIIINATION COO>ITIONS.

ENG III-9 It.A ERROR: ERROR IN (PERATOR RESPONSE. / tff PROBt..91 DESCRIPTION: LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS t()T READABl£ lM!E:R ~IENT LIGHT CONDITIONS, WITH OR WITHWT INTERfA. I LLUIIINATION. 8780 PARAGRAPH IUIBER: 6. 4. 3. 3. B, 1 SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: INCREASE THE READABILITY OF LESEND PBS UNDER ALL ILLUPIINATION CONDITIONS, tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-60-4 120Ae3045l EHC PANEL UPPER SECTION TO BE RE~

• DATA CCUECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY REMARKS: 4.1-5 I IDIS INVO.. VED: IIARI< fOIBER LOCATION CCJlllONENT LESEND PBS ff tt'.IT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTE/JI V/6/07/85
• *
• ttJP!AN EMJINEERitE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODEC 02/28/86 ASSESSJIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al3489 HIQi RESISTAta PUSHBUTTONS tUIAN ERROR: ~WE.Y REsro&: -OP IIII6HT NOT FlJLLY DEPRESS PUSHBUTTONS.

1H PROllEN IESCRIPTI~: ENS III-9 PBS~ CR SIIUATOR PIEASURED RESISTAra OF 6.5 LBS EXCEEDitE 48 WfCE flAX RESISTAra RECOR MENDED FOR OPERATION. fff 1780 PARASRAPH tUBER: 6.4.3.2,D SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: RECOIIIIEND REPLACIN3 PUSHBUTTONS IF PROBLEM EXISTS FOR TURBINE TRIP PUSHBUTTONS ON UNIT-2. DISPOSITION: SEE PI-60-3 (28Ai3045) TURBINE TRIP PUSHBUTTONS BEIN3 R£PLACED AS PART OF EHC TU RBirE coon Pll£L CHANGE OOT

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUIBE:R: TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY REflARKS:

DS-13 IIDIS I NYCl. lJED: -flARK rtJflSER LOCATI~ CQIIIIONENT NAfE SYSTEPI SUBSYSTEM TURBINE TRIP H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 07/11/85

• *
• HED ND TITLE t(JPIAN ENiINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ~418 LIT COND CF LEGEND PBS NOT RECOONIZAa..E UNDER HIGHEST Al'IBIENT LISH ERROR: ~y /ERROR IN a> RESPONSE.

tff PR08LEIII DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSPIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE I -S 07/11/85 ILWIINATED CONDITION OF LESENED PUSHllJTTONS IS t<<JT RECOONIZABLE LINDER HIGHEST PREDICTABLE ANBIENT LIGHTING COM> 07N PARAGRAPH rtJPIBER: 6.~.3.3.B.2 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: REPLACE PRESENT BULBS IN PBS WITH ONES OF HISHER WATTAGE tff DISPOSITION: REFER TO VD-5 (23801208) AND E-31 <20A02389l, DATA Sl:l.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NU!'IBER: TP-4.1 CONTR1l.S SURVEY rE!ARKS: C-13. IT1£SE PBS ARE LOCATED ON THE TURBINE: MODE) ITEJIIS I NVCl. "91 MRK rfJMBER

• LOCATION CCJIIIPOt£NT NAIii£ SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM LES:::'.ND PBS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE *
• *
• ti.Jw:w EN6INEERIN6 DISCR*PANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A83411 BARRIERS OF LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS ARE RECESSED.

COIIPL.T HJIAH ERROR: IJIERATOR ERROR fff PROJLEIII DESCRIPTION: BARRIERS BET CONTISWJS LES PBS ARE RECESSED INSTEAD OF RAISED PER 6UIDELir£ RECOPIMENDATIO N. 17N PARASRAPH tt.Jf!BER: 6.4.3.3.D.1 SUGGESTED BACl<FIT: INSTIU RAISED BARRIERS BEnEEN CONTI6UOIJS PUSHBUTTONS. DISPOSITION: DELETE-THERE ARE BARRIERS BEnlEEN BUTTONS WHICH PREVENT TWO BUTTONS FROfll BEINS P USHED ACCIDENTALLY. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ CODE Nl.JflBER: TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY ~RKS: C-'14. (Tl£SE LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS ARE LOCATED ON TURBINE l!IODEl ITEMS INVCl. VED: IIARK tUIBER LOCATION CClfllOtDT NAE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LEGEND PBS ff t()T IN INV FILE t / 07/11/85

• * * ~,J~ S~INEERit!3 D!SCRE?At<<:Y REPORT 02!2B!B6 SURRY UNIT2 CODE 8 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ~l al4TROC. DOES NOT INCREASE WHEN TURNED CLOCKWISE OR RISHT. ltJIIIAN ERROR: ERROR IN (J) RESPONSE.

fH PIIIJlLElll Il£SCRIPTI0N: ENS II -6 CONTRll.S 00 NOT ~ORM TO REOOIREl'!ENT TO INCREASE WHEN TURNfD CLOO<WISE OR TO THE RI6HT. 07N PARASRAPH l'IMBER: 6. 4. 2.1 SOOGESTED BACKFIT: REPLACE CONTROL W/ SWITCH THAT INCREASES WHEN TURNED CLOO<WISE

• . DISPOSITICW:

1111> SW POS & LABELI!E SO RAISE TO RISHT, LOWER TO LEFT. ALSO INC1..UD£ l'!AIN GEN YO LT RES CTRL SWS W/ BER SEN SIIS. DATA COLLECTION Il£SCRIPTI0N CODE Nl>>IBER: TP-4, 1 C0'4TR0LS SURVEY REfllARKS: 4.1-3. 87N 6UID*LIN£ SHW-D READ: 64216 ITEJIIS ll'Ml.~: JIIARK tulBER LOCATION COfillOt£NT 01R GEN NO 2 llf4 SEN Vll.T SPEED CNTII. VO..T CNTII. H NOT IN INV FILE + HNOT IN INV FILE 1 H fi'.JT IN INV FILE + ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEl'I SUBSYSTEM tk,/07/85

• *
• HIJ!l!AN ENSINF'l='Rlri6

!lISCREPA1£Y REPORT SURRY ~IT2 CODEC 02/28/86

• ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A148111 PROCEDURES AND REFERBa MATERIALS t<<lT ACCESSill.E FOR I.JUT 2 OP.
• ti.A ERROR: DELAY lN ~1RIN6 INFORIIIATION.

fff PROa.91 DESCRIPTION: NOD III-9 PROC & REF IATERlAL ARE LOCATED OOTS1DE TI£ OPS BOlHlARYFDR UNIT 2. OP~ TO SET S0P£0NE a.SE TO SET REF. 8718 PARASRM-i ttJIIIBER: 6,1,1,lt,A.l SU66ESTED BACl<F IT: ,ORE PROCEDURES REFEREfCE IATERIALS SO THEY ARE WITHIN THE OPERATORS BOUNDARY, fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-35 (2M842'03l. PI-7 (20000103) ALSO REFERRED TD E-35

• DATA CCLLECTI~

DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1, 1 l()RKSPACE SURVEY ~RKS: . P, 9.2-8 ITEJIIS INYll. ',{I): IARK tullER LOCATION~~ PROCEDURES REFIKE fAt. ' ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<lT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEM 96/07/85

• * * !-4'rw~ Et-.!S!NC-ERINS D!SCREAANCY REPORT SURRY ltlIT2 CODE B TITLE 22Ai4e82 EllJIPIENT NOT ADE~mv COVERED IN PROCEDURES.

ltM ERROR: I IIISINTERPRETATIOtt IF EQUIPf!ENT STATUS. Ir£0RRECT OPERATION 0 F EllJIPIENT, 1H PROaEPI DESCRIPTION: '1?/*:)0/DC. .....,~..,, uw ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NOD II -6 01/30/86 l(JRE DETAILED PROCEDURES FOR f£EDED 9-tARED SYS/PNLS, PROCEDURES DO MlT ADEOOATELY COVER SH ARED EIIJIPMENT. 17N PARAGRAPH N.lfl!BER: 6,1,3,1.E.5 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: PROVIDE PROCEDURES FOR THE CPERATION OF SHARED EQUIPIIIENT. 1H DISPOSITION: REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR SHARED EOOIPIENT TO ENSURE THEIR AD£QOO:Y, DATA CCU£CTIC* DESCRIPTIC* AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION ~RKS: P.9.2-7 ITEMS INVCL VED: MAK rtJIIIBER LOCATION COlflOfENT NAIE CIRC WTR Pr<<. FIRE PROTCTN 6AS TURB Pf<<.. VENT PN.. ff f()T IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

• *
• EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY I.rm 2 CODE C 03/17/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW tED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A05901' ABILITY TO SAIIPLE VENTILATI~

STREAMS NEEDED. ti.MN ERROR:. fff PROBI..EII! DESCRIPTION: I -5 NECESSARY ABILITY TO SAMPLE VARIOUS VENTILATION STREAl'IS Ct(JT IN CR) WAS BUT IS t<<JT NOW AVA ILABI..E. 1780 PARAGRAPH NJMBtR: 6.1.1.1.A SU66ESTED BAD<FIT: PROVIDE ABILITY TO SAMPLE VENTILATION ST~. DISPOSITION: A BEITER SYSTE/11 BEEN INSTALLED IM-IICH WILL ST()) ALL STACK FANS IF HIGH RADIAT Ill1 IS DETECTED. t<<J ACTION REQUIRED

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATI!l1 AND VALIDATI~

~RKS: P.9.2-2 ITEIIIS I NVCA.. VED: LOCATION COMPONENT NA/11£ svsm1 SUBSYSTEf!I VENT STREAIE ff rt'.lT IN INV FILE t 03/17/86

• *
• EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSNENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al5l92 REOCTOR BRCl.Qff.

CRITICll. BEL!J4 INSERTIOO LIIIIITS. tlM ERROR: ERROR IN CJ> RESPONSE. '** PR08t.EJII DESCRIPTION: TRS I -2 DURIIE NJRM SETUP FOLLOWitE DJTA6E FOR STIii SEN INSPECTION, RX BR!X.GHT CRITICAL. BELIJI MIN I NSERTI~ LIIIIIT FOR *o* '** "7N PARAGRAPH l'tJIIIBER: 6,1,1,1,A 6.3.1.2,A,2 SU66£STED BACKFIT: IfllPWIENT ADflIN CTRLS TO ENSURE RX t<<JT BROUGHT CRITI~ BELOW INSERT L.fllTS. Cfl!PTR MONITORIN 6 SYSIDI COOLD BE USED DISPOSITION: REIDIEND SHLLATOR TRNG: OOUBLINS THEORY, l/fll PLOTTING CLOSENESS TO CRITICALITY VS ROD INSERTIOO LIIIIITS CRNRKSl DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tUBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-3,1 1¥f<<J!ICIATOR SYSTEfllS REVIEW R01ARKS: HR-1, WRITTEN FROl'I LER-78-013103L--0. DISP:& RELATED l'IALFUNCS ITBIS INVOLVED: flARK tOIBER LOCATION aNlONENT ,-svsm, SUBSYSTEfll AC-R-1 ff NJT IN INV FILE* 97/11/85

• HUWIN EN6IN£ERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY LNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSIIIENT . LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Al5ll3 EXCEEDED INTEIMl. CW TRANSIENT FG SURVEILUN:E, II.NIN ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE, fff PROIUJII DESCRIPTION:

COIIIPLT EXCEED INTRVI.. ON TRANS FQ SURV AXIll. PMR DISTRIB fllON SYSTRANS SURV 00 LAST (T +480 IHNSl. I NTERV EXCEEDED lHR 48" 1718 PARAGRAPH tfJ"8ER: 6,1,l,4.A,1 6,1,l,4.A.2 SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: IIIIPL.EPENT A COll)UTERIZED ll!ONITORING SYSTEJII FOR SURVEJL.L.Af,CE REGUIREJIIENTS. fff DISPOSITI~: DELETE-THIS WAS AN ENSINEERirE NOT OP£RATI0NS RESPONS&.TY. THIS SURV NO LONGER R EOOIRED, NO LCltER A.T.S. ITEN. MTA COL.l..ECTION DESCRIPTION IWD CODE Nl.JIIIBER: TP-1, 1 WORKSPACE SURVEY ~RKS: ~-2. WRITIEN FRQIII LER-78-022/03l-0 ITEMS INVCl.W>: IIIARK tOIBER LOCATION CC!flPOf£NT NA,£ SYSIDI SUBSYSTEl'I TRNSIENT FQ ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 07/11/85 . I .i ' I I

• *
• HUMAN EN6INEERil<6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE 02/28/86 ASSESSPIENT LAST. REVIEW . HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A85l84 EXCEEDED INTERVAL~

TRANSIENT FO SURVEIWKE tUIAN ERROR: ERROR IN CP RESPONSE. Hf PAOa.£111 DESCRIPTION: CORT EXCEED INTRVL. TRANS FQ SURV BECAUSE LAST STEP OF AXIll. PWR DISTRIB MEAS T~ SEQ WAS N OT PERFORIED. i71N PARASRM-1 NUJIBER: 6.1.t.4.A.1 6.1.1.4.A.2 SU66ESTED BACKFIT: REINSTUT PERSONNEL. I1'1PL£ll1ENT COIIIPI.JTERIZED SYSTEfll FOR SURVEILLArCE TRAD<IN6. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-THIS SURVEILL.Ara IS r<<JT LONGER REQUIRED, r<<l LONGER A T. S. ITE/11, DATA COLLECT!~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NI.JIIIBER: TP-1. 1 l<<JRKSPACE SURVEY REMM<S: HR-3. WRITTEN FRCJIII LER-78-eJe/031..-t IT91S INVO.. VED: !ARK ~R LOCATION cmRlNENT SYSTEM SUBSYSTE.111 T~ SEIDC H r<<JT IN INV FILE t IB7/11/85

• *
• HlJll'.W ENSINEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSl!ENT LAST REVIEW* TITLE R£~IB1LITY STATUS DATE 22A95N5 MISSED SURVEILLANCE

-RCP *c* FIRE PROTECTION .._ ERROR: ERROR IN IP RESPONSE. 1H PROIUN DESCRIPTI~: I -2 QJRY RCP *c* STATOR & BEARINi TEJll)S t()T DOtE HOORLY AS REQ. SURV REQ BECAUSE FIRE PROT t£AT DET NOT CPERAJl.E. fH 87118 PARASRAPH rtJIIIBER: 6,1,1,4,A.l

• 6.1.1.4.A.2 SU66ESTED BACKF IT: INVESTIGATE THE FEASIBILITY IF IMPWIENTINS A CO,ipufERIZED SYSTEl'I FOR SURVEILLArCE TRACKIN G. DISPOSITION:

PUWT PROCESS CC!fRJTER BEIN; UPSRADED TO PROVIDE ItCREASED RELIABILITY. (ALSO SE E PI-99 C~ll. l DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION IWil CODE NUMBER: TP-1, l liORJ<SPACE SURVEY REMRKS: HR-4. WRITIEN FROPI LER-78-036/031..-0 ITEJIS ItfJ(l.\01 "IRK fUIBER LOCATI~ CIJllOt£NT NAfE SYSTEIII SUBSYSTE/11 ID> C STATOR ff t()T IN INV FIL£ f / 07/11/85

• * * ~INEERIN6 DISCREPArCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT2 CODE B ASSESSM£NT LAST REVIEW HED f() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A6l86 RWST TEJIIPERATURE GREATER THAN 45 DES F. ERROR: EllJIMNT FAIWRE fff PROa.£111 DESCRIPTION:

EN6 I -2 / RWST IDIP INDICS R£AD 44 DES F & 46 DES F ON DN.S I I II RESPECTivaY. CALIBRATION PERFOR IED: Oft. I INDIC LOW. 1788 PARA6Rf¥lti rOIBER: 6. 5.1. 2. F !ll66ESTED BACKFIT: INSTIU 3RD CHN.. TO PROVIDE COfflRMIN6 INDIC. REINSTRUCT OPS TO TAKE CORRECTIVE OCTION BEF ORE LIIIIITS ARE READ£D, fff DISPOSITION: PROVIDE ~RROW RANGE CONTROL, INDICATION AND ANNKIATION. (35 DES F TO 55 DES F . ) DATA COIJ.ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tOIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION ~RKS: HR~. WRITIEN FROM L.£R-82-044/i3L-@.~ IIDIS IHVll. ~: fllARK NJIIIER LOCATION COfll'.lOt£NT tM SYSTEM TI-CS-1Ml TI-CS-1NB TI-CS-2Ml TI-cs-2'NB H NOT IN INV FILE

• HNOT IN INV FILE I RAA308 IETER CONTAINP£NT SPRAY SYSTEJII RAB388 METER COHAINIENT SPRAY SYSTEJI SUBSYSTEJII 12/19/85
• *
• tt.lMN ENSINEERit<<l DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSES9ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPOOIBILITY STATUS DATE 22A86311 BRCl<EN cnmn. SURFOCES.

IUllN ERIKIR: IF BRO<EN CONTRCl.S/COlflOt£NTS 60 llfflTICED/~REPAIRED, Tl£Y MAY l()T BE AYAILIAEU IN THE CF EIERSEfCY. tH PROa.91 DESCRIPTI()I: IT01 IJAIIIA6ED '<SIIIASHED> APPARENTLY BY SOJIETHIN6 STRIKING IT. UN PARAGIRlH NlJ!BER: 6. 4. 1. 1. E. 1 SUGGESTED ~IT: NOD I -5 INST~ QJARDS ARCllND ANY CTRLS/COf!PS CLOSE TO FLOOR TO PROTECT AGAINST ACCIDE.'iT~ DAP!A6E. tH DISPOSITION: PR0YID£ THAT 00 N:JT PRESENT A SAFETY PROBLEM OR RECESS OR RELOCATE ESPECI ~y TURBINE SI.PERVISORY ~L

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND COD£ M.JIIBER:

TP-4. 1 CClfTROLS SURVEY ~Rl<S: DS-5 ITBIS INYCl.YED: -MAI< tUIBEA LOCATION COflPOrENT tM: SYSTE/JI SUBSYSTEfll FUSE llll.DER ff N:JT IN INY FILE t 11/38/86

• *
• HUJAf ENiINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY LWIT2 CODE C ASSESSMENT LAST REYIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 22Bill42 ~RENT roH.ESEND INDICATOR LIGHT IEANIN6. ttJIIAN ERROR: ItttIBITED LEARNING.

fff PROa.91 IIE&:RIPTION: LABEL t()T PROVID£D TO INDICATE ~IrE Cf LISHT HN LIT uera N\JIIBER: 6.5.3.2.A. l ~STED BACKFIT: t<<lI) PROVIDE LABEL CLOSE TO INDICATOR LIGHT TO SHOW IEANINS OF LIGHT WHEN LIT. '** DISPOSITION: Tl£SE ARE POWER AVAILABLE INDICATORS. REPLACE LENS COYERS WITH WHITE ONES. DATA co..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-6. 1 LABELS IWD LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-5. l DISPLAYS SURVEY REJIIARKS: DS-18. RED t()N-LESEND IND LTS ON BORATION INTEGRATORS BB 2-1 IT91S ItMl. VEih IIIARK NJIBER LOCATION CO!PCIJENT ,f'.IIIIE SYSTEM RED !OH.ES H t4JT IN INV FILE* III-9 07/11/85 SUBSYSTEM

• *
• t£D t<<) llJMN ENHNEERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT2 CODE B TITLE 22F23126 YENTIUITION PAIEl. CONTROLS FDR UNIT 2 Ir<<:OOENIENTLY LOCATED ERROR: DELAY DR ERROR IN tl>ERATDR RESPCNlES tff PROa.81 DESCRIPTION:

I.NIT 2 VENT PN. C()ITROI..S LOCATED IN UNIT 1 e1ee PARASRIPH OBER: 6.8.2.1,A 6.8.2.1.B 6.8.2.1,C SIJ36ESTED BACl<FIT: RELOCATE 1+1 DISPOSITION: 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6 II -7 e11u1as PERFDRIII RELOCATION STUDY. SEE DS-21~2 -8 !22A01306>, DS-28 !22A03215>, PI-117-3 128983816), .DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION CODE ~R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-1,2 ANTHRCJPOIIIETRICS SURVEY REJIIARl(S: PI-19-9 I TEJIIS I NVCl. VED: fllARK NJMIIER LOCATION CClfJIDP£NT l'f.llE H t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEfll SUBSYSTEPI

• *
• ttM OOINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODEC 02/28/86 ASSESSIIENT LAST REVIEW HED t<<l TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE . 238N482 STlff'IN6 tUIAN ERROR: LACK OF TIIIEl.Y RESPCNiE TO EVENTS RE!lJIRI"1:i IIVIEDIATE COAREC TIVE ~Tl~. EXCESSIVE l<<:IRl<l..00>, lff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:

t<<>D III-8 CURRENTLY: 3 RO'S & 1 SRO. DURIN6 SOIE EVENTS POTENTIAL TASK LOADIPE PROSS MY ARISE, (E.6

• I LOSS OF POER) lff 87N PARflSRAPH rtJIIIBER:

6.1.3,1.D 6.1,1,2,A !IJ66ESTED BACKFIT: INVESTIGATE tECESSITY FOR ADDI"1:i ADDITI!JfA. RO TO EACH SHIFT AND IF RE!lJIRED -IIIIPLEJIEN T, DISPOSITION: ADfllIN CTRL. RECOIEND THAT 4TH CPERATOR, PER APPENDIX "R", BE AVAILABLE TO CR WI THIN A StllRT PERIOD OF TI~

• DATA cou..ECTION DESCRIPTION jWI) CODE MER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATI~

AND VALIDATION ~RKS: YD-6, (DURIM:i WA!.KTKRU, 5 OPS OBSERVED RESPONDING TO EVENT.> ITOO IrMl. 'tllh MRK NJIIIBER LOCATI~ CQll)Qr£NT tM SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM RB¥;TOR CPS HNOT IN INV FILE f 02/14/86

• *
• HED NO 23801115 ums CF MEASURE IUIAN ERROR: TITLE t<<.JIIIAN EN6INEERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY LNIT3 CODE B IUSINTERPRETATI~

OF DISPLAYED OOTPUT. Hf PIICB..EN DESCRIPTION: 02/28/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE NODOO II -6 88/87/85 Tl£RE IS NO L.ABa OR onER INDICATION CF DISPLAYED PARAMETERS OR ~ITS BEirE DISP'LAYED. 87N ~RAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1.1.B 6.5.1.4.A 6.6.1.1 St.66ESTED BACKFIT: ADD APPROPRIATE UNITS OF l!IEASURE <E. 6., SPf!). Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO E-1 (23A01802)

• DATA CD..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION VALIDATION TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS ~D LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REMARKS: VD-11 ITBIS INYCLVED:

IIARK tUIBER . LOCATI<lt COfl.POfENT NAI£ BIERS CST 13 FI-1-945 FI-1-*946 FI-VS-118 LI-DA-UIA LI-DA-111AN LI-DA-1188 NIH-41 NR-1-42 NR-1-43 klH-44 H NOT IN IPN FILE

• HNOT IN INV FILE* HNOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE* HNOT IN INV FILE f HNOT IN INV FILE* HNOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE* HNOT IN INV FILE.* H r<<lT IN INV FILE f SYSTEM SUBSYSTEPI

/

• *
• HED t(): 23891105 IT01S INYCl..VED:

tlJMN EN6IN£ERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY UNIT3 MRK tUGIER LOCATION ClJIIIPOr£HT ,-SYSTEfil PHIS-119 RSHXASW RS HX B SW RS HX C SW RSHXDSW RWST LVL CH3 RWST LYL CH4 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<lT IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE 1 02/28/86 SUBSYSTEfil

• *
• HUMM E~lNEERirE DISC:REPAfCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESS1ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23881286 RELATED ~TRCl./DISPLAY 6ROO>IN6 ttllAN ERROR: IDl>ORAl ERRORS -DELAY IN SEARCH REsmtiE THE, lff PAOa.EN DESCRIPTION:

JI -7 CNTALS/DISPS SHClJLD BE ASSIGNED TO PM..S IN Fl.N:TION 6RIXPS RE~TED TO SYSTEM STRLCTURE, (W /IN &*BET. 6RllJ>Sl 8788 PARAGRMi UBER: 6,8,1,1,A 6.8,1,1,B QJ66£STED BACl<FIT: INVESTIGATE FEASIBILITY !F CCl.OCATING FUtCTlONALLY RELATED GROUPS OF CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS l*f DISPOSITION: COHTRCl. REARRAtEEIENTS ARE f()T CRITICAL FOR SAFE OPERATION OR~ (NOT HISH SAFETY IMPORTIN:El. NJ ACTION REQUIRED * ~TA COL.L£CTION DESCRIPTION IWD CODE tUIB£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REMRKS: VD-3-1. ITEMS IrML~: . IIARK tOBEA LOCATION COIIPClENT tfl,IE IISA SUPP BYP lilSR SlJIP IY ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJII 02/14/86

• * * .IUIIW EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE A 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPl}ffiIBILITV STATUS DATE 23881287 ARRANGEIENT CF RELATED ~TJn.S/DISPLAYS ttM ERROR: SUBSTITUTION ERROR: READIFE THE WRIN3 DISPLAY; OCTUATIN6THE WR£N3 ~ROL. fH PRIJIUIII DESCRIPTION:

ENS II -5 ~RD CONTRB.S AR£ r<<lT AR~ IN Tl£ SAi£ ORDER AS ASSOCIATED VERTICAL BOARD DISPLA YS. EACH ~TROL 9WLD OCOJIY Tl£ SME RELATIVE POSITION AS ITS RELATED DISPLAY, 87N PARA6RM1 ~fl!BER: 6.9.2,2.D 6.9.2.2.B.1* 9.J66ESTED BACKFIT: REVERSE ORDER OF CTRLS ON BB, ADDRESS IN TRAININ6 TO ENSURE CORRECT RE-LEARNING. fH DISP0SITION1 DISPLAYS ON VERT!~ BOARDS ARE Be:Irti IIEIIOYED ~D OCTUAL VALVE POSITION INDICATI ON IS BEIFE ADDED ON BENCHIOlRD ABOVE CONTROLS PER OCPS 85-07 AND 85-eB

• DATA cou.ECTION D£SCRIPTI0N AND COD£ NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REII\RKS:

YD-4, (DISPLAYS TO BE fllOVED: YI-VJIIS-lilA, YI-VIIIS-181Bl ITEJIS IfMl. VED: !!ARK rt.lllBER LOCATION coimENT tM: PCV-1455C PCY-1456 YI-YM5-181A YI-VMS-111B ff r<<lT IN INV FIL£* ff r<<lT IN INV FIL£* ff r<<lT IN INV FIL£* H t(JT IN INV FIL£* SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM "5/91/85

• *
• HJIIIAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B 02/28/86 ASSESSfiENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23a81298 VERIFICATI~

CF EOOIPIENT STATUS HJIAN ERROR: BASINS DECISION ON ERROEOUS INFO. FAILURE TO OBTAIN OR APPL Y ALL ~T DECISI~ Ir.FO. lff PROIUPI DESCRIPTION: ENG I -5 TURB TRIP INDICS; STCP WS & REHTR STATUS INDICATORS l()T RELIABLE TO VERIFY W POS, AUX CP S itJST BE SENT TO PUffl e1ee PARASRAPH N.Jf!BER: 6.S.1.1.B SU66£STED BACKF IT: INVESTIGATE REASON FOR INDICATOR UNRELIABILITY ~D CORRECT. fff DISPOSITI~: EN6IrEERIN6 TO CONSULT WITH MAfUACTURER (F LIStiT SOCKETS TO SOLVE PROBl..91. COOR DINATE WITH OC LJlSRADE E-31 (20A02309)

• DATA COU£CTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI~

AND VALIDATION ~RKS: VD-5 IIDIS IPML IIED: MARK ~R LOCATION cc>>IPOHENT tM: ~HF. INDICAT TURB STCP W H f(JT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEJII 11/11/85

• *
• HUMAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 3 CODE A 83/26/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23001223 RELATED CONTROL/DISPLAY GROUPING tUIAN ERROR: TEti!PORAL ERRORS -DELAY IN SEARCH AND RESPONSE TIME. Hf PROBLBI DESCRIPTION:

ENG II -5 CTRLS/DISPS SHllJI.D BE ASSIGNED TO PNLS IN FUNCTION GROUPS RELATED TO SYSTBI STROCTURE (II/I N & BET GROUPS). 8780 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER: 6.8.1.1.A

6. 8.1.1. B SUSSESTED BACKFIT: INVESTIGATE FEASIBILITY OF COLOCATINS FUNCTIONru.Y RELATED GROUPS OF CONTROLS IVm~DISPLAYS Hf DISPOSITION:

SEE DIAGRAM FOR RECOl'fflENDED REARRANGBENT. NOTE:SINCE cnrr TOT PR, CTPIT TOT PRS, AND LI-DA-100 ARE NOT FUNCTIONALLY RELATED, THEY DO NOT NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FUNCTIONAL GROUPINS. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REf!!ARKS: VD-3-2&3 ITE~ INVOLVED: l'IARK NUl'!BER LOCATION COIIIPONENT NAME SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM LI-DA-100A ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-DA-110B ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-RS-150A ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-RS-150B ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-RS-151A ff NOT IN INV FILE t LI-RS-151B ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-Lll!-100B ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-IJH00C ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-Lll!-100D ff NOT IN INV FILE t PI-IJl-11 lA ff NOT IN INV FILE t 83/26/86 --------

• *
• ltlA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 02/28/86 SURRY UNIT3 CODE B ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23N1224 RELATED ~TR(L/DISPLAY SRCU>INS tlJIAH ERROR: IDPORAL ERRORS -DELAY IN SEARCH AND RESPOHSE TIME. fff PROll.EM DESCRIPTION:

NOD III-7 CNTRI..S/DISPS SHtllD Be: ASSI6tED TO PM..S IN Fl.CNTION SROOPS RELATED TO SYSTEJII STRUCTURE, (W /IN AND BET SRW>S). 8718 PARAS~ tUIBER:

• 6.8.l, l,A 6.8.1,1.B SU66ESTED BACKF IT: INVESTISATE FEASIBILITY If' CCl..OCATIN6 FOCTIONLLY RELATED GROUPS OF CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS Hf DISPOSITIIJI:

PUT RVLIS !l4 VB tEAR CORE COO.INS JIONITORS AND KEYPAD ON Be:N:HBOARD NEAR CRT DIS PLAY CCMR(LS. REFER TO ICC UPGRADE PER E-29 121A01136l

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUPIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATIIJI

~RKS: VD-3...\ I TENS IrMl. i.£D: NARK NJIBER LOCATION CQ!ll0r£NT NAlE COR a.NG !IOI _ IM.IS ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII ! '81/38/86

• *
• l{J!IIAN OOlNEERlrE DISCREPArCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE A 02/28/86 AS&SSIIIENT LAST REVIEW HED NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE. 23101225 RELATED ~TROL/DISPI...AY 6RGPIN6 ltM ERROR: TEJIIPOIR.

ERRORS -DELAY IN SEARCH AND RESPONSE THE * ./ fff PROa.BI DESCRIPTION: ENS II -5 CNTRLS/DlSPS 5HO.lD BE ASSISNED TO Prt.S IN F!JCTION SRW>S R£LATED TO SYSTEf!I STRUCTURE, !W /IN & BEWT 6ROOPS), 8786 PARAGRAPH ruBER: 6.8.1,l.A 6.8.1,1,B !lJ66ESTED BACl<FIT: IHVESTISATE FEASIBILITY CF al.OCATirE FOCTIOtRLY RELATED GROUPS OF CONTROLS ~D DISPLAYS fff DlSPOSITI~: IIEARAANSE SI CTRLS !ACru:ITION & R£SETl AND CLS <ACTUATION & R£SET> AND DO. _ ADD D ISCHARSE VIL VE AND PlJl>S. DATA COUECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE MJMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RBIARl<S: VD-3-5 I TENS INY<l. \Eh flARK romER LOCATION CO!fll)ENT NllE CLS CTfl.S SI CTRLS H NOT IN INV FILE f HNOT IN INV FILE t SYSTE/11 SUBSYSTEf!I 81/30/86

• *
• tlM EN6INEERIM3 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY ~IT3 CO~ B 02/28/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23812814 ~IT VALLE PROORESSIIX-4 KM ERROR: READIN6 ERRORS. fff PROll£lll DESCRIPTION:

II -7 THIJIIM£EL L()'.U) RATE j PER l!IttlTE ()I TURBirE PAr£L 6= * .31. & 8=.6j SO SE1l1.J8a IS 1%, , 31. 4% 51

• 31.
• 61 171118 PARA6RAPH NUIEIER: 6.5.1.5.C SU66ESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE SCALES WHICH INCREASE BY ~ITS IF 5 6PM. DISPOSITION:

RECCN9END REPLACIM3 THUPIBWHEEL W/ ONE PRCJlERLY LABELED FOR ASCENDIN6 ttlll!ER PROSR ESS (.3, .6, 1 1 2, 3, 4, 5%1 DATA COLLECTIIX-4 DESCRIPTION AND CODE tOIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATIIX-4 AND VALIDATI()I TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY ~li<S: VD-8-3 ITalS IrMl.lJElh MRK NEER l.OCATl()I COflPO£NT NA,£ ff MJT IN INV FILE t SYST91 SUBSYSTel 05/01/85

• *
• HED NO 23882243 ~IT Vjl.l£ PROSRESSI~. ERROR: READING ERROR lff PROBWI DESCRIPTION:

llJIIIAN ENGINEERING DISC~V REPORT SURRV IJHT3 CODE A TITLE 03/03/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -5 18/17/85 SF°*W FLO IND PROORESSES IN I.WITS CF 7 6PM. SUCCESSIVE Vjl_l£S INDICATED BY UNIT GRADS St<<J LLD PROORESS BY UNITS OF 1,2,5, 18 OR "1.TIPLE ll£REOF. 0780 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER: 6.5.1,5.C

• SU66£STED BACKFIT: PROVIDE SCIUS WHICH INCREASE BY UNITS OF 5 6PM. *** DISPOSITION:

REFER TO PI-71-14 (20A02216l, DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION ~RKS: VD-8-1. I TEfllS INVCl. VED: IIARI< tUIBER LOCATION C(Jl)(lENT NAME Fl-Fw-290A FI-FW-280B FI-FW-280C ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 ff f()T IN INV FILE 1 ff r(JT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

• *
• HUIAN ~N6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86 SURRY UNIT3 CO~ , ASSESSIIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 238822~ I.WIT Vil.LE PROORESSI~.

rot>LT 08/07/85 It.A ERROR:. READIN6 ERROR. Hf PROll.91 DESCRIPTIIJ4: S6 FLO IND PR00R£SSES IN !.NITS OF 7 GPIII. SUCCESSIVE Vll.l£S INDICATED BY UNIT GRADS SHClJLD PROORESS BY ISEE RNRIO 0700 PARAGRAPH NI.JfllBE:R: 6.5.1.5.C SUBGESTED BACKFIT: PROVIDE.SCALES WHICH INCREASE BY UNITS OF 5 GPJI, Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-17 IS EASILY READ ON IETER. SEE PI-71

• DATA ClllECTION De:SCRIPTI~

AND CODE NIJIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Vll.IDATION REMARKS: VD-8-2, PROB D£SC: UNITS OF 1,2,5, 10 OR MULTIPLES THEREOF. ITEMS INYO..VED: JIIARI( UBER LOCATION C()ll)()QT ,-Ll-1-494 Ll-1-495 LI-1-496 ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FIL£ t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEJ!I

• HUIIIAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY .~IT 3 CODE B 03/17/86 ASSESSPIENT LAST REVIEW HEO r<<J TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23882486 ~R SPEED ADJUSTABILITY IUIAN ERROR: BASirE A DECISION ON INADEOOATE INFORIIIATICW.

Hf PROBt.01 DESCRIPTI~: t<<ID I -2 PRESENT SPEED OF 1 IN/HR IS CONSIDERED INADEOOATE TO TRACK RATE-CF-otANSE lNFO A:CORDIN6 T 0 CPS. CSEE 1191ARKSJ 8710 PARAGRAPH tu!BER: 6.5.4.1, I SJ68ESTED BACl<F IT: PROVIDE WIDER RAN6E'SC1US WITH FASTER PAPER SPEED, SlfilILAR TO THE NEUTRON FLUX RECORD£ R. fff DISPOSITION: ENSURE COOLilOWN RATE ON ERF Cc>>IPUTER AS BACKUP TO PROCESS co,ip(JTER, HEATUP/COOLD RATE CURVES VIA GRAPHICS DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUi.BER: . TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATI~ TP-5.1 DISPLAYS SURVEY RE#IRKS: VO-7. IF PLANT CCJIIIP DWN, OPS DEPEND ON RCRDS TO TRACK COOLDN IIDIS ItMl. VED: TR-1-413 TR-1-423 TR-1-433 LOCATION COfllPONENT NAJE ff NlT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 13/17/86 *

• *
• ENSI~ERIN6 DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY ~IT3 CODE B al/83/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23803818 FAlLTY/IKWIR LOGIC ttM ERROR: REPORTIN6 SISNll. 000 IN WRCN:i DIRECTION.

LATE RESPONSE TO S TAllJS D'SNlE, FORll.lATIN6 ERRIIEOUS RI.LES/PRir<<:IPLES "* PR01l91 DESCRIPTION: EN6 I -5 L06IC IS SUSPECT, W/ BOTH SAN & RED LTS ILLI.JIIIINATINS SIIU.TANEOUSLY. TO VERIFY FLOW l))S RE FER TO INDICATOR~ VB 171!10 PARASRAPH NUMBER: 6.5.1, 1,B 6.5. l. l.C SU6GESTED ~IT: IHCI< REASON FOR SIIIJLT INDICATOR ILLU!JII~TION, IF FAULTY CORRECT, IF CORRECT ADDRESS INT RAINIIE OR REDESISN. "* DISPOSITI()I: RECOIEND INSTAUIN6 POSITION INDICS ON CN CIRC WTR OUTLET VVS IN PERCENT, FLOW OR DEfllAND AS APPROPRIATE. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTI()I AND CODE NU!tilER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATIOO VALIDATION ~RKS: VD-9 I IDIS INW. VED: IIARK ru!BER LCJCATI()j C(Jl)O£NT NAME SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII CN CIRC WTR H NJT IN INV FILE t / 05/IU/85 ' I I I I

• *
• ENGINEERING DISCREPAtCY REPORT 03/83/06 SURRY IJHT3 CODE B ASSESSPcNT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23&03tl9 FlJCTICNUY SRO.PED CONTRCl.S ERROR: Ir£REASED SEARCH THE/DELAY IN RESPONSE THIE. I H+ PROBWI DESCRIPTION:

00 II -6 TD AFW PP r<<JT SRWPED W/ 0Tf£R AFW PPS. FUf(:TIIJtRLY RELATED CTRLS SHCllD BE TOOETHER WHEN IDENTICSl. IN PURPOSE 07N PARA6RAPH NUMBER: 6.8.2, l,A,2 St.66ESTED BACl<FIT: EVALUATE NECESSITY FOR LOCATING CTRLS IN CLOSER PROXIPIITY TO EAOi 0Tf£R AND RELOCATE IF NE. CESSARY. H+ DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI -62 (28A03011> AND PI-117 (2000-3016) DATA CCl.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION ~S: VD-10. IT91S INV(l.UED: IIARK tUIBER LOCATION t:O,l)()f£NT l'M: SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ff t()T IN INV FIL£* 07/11/85

• *
• 23883846 IIIISSil'E C0"4TR0LS.

ttJIIIAN ERROR: DELAY IN RE~ THIE, Hf PROll.91 DESCRIPTION: IIJIIIAN EN6INEERiffi DISCREPIKY REPORT SURRY lJj IT 3 CODE B TITLE PORVS ,UST BE ~ISOLATED LIXALY. Hf 8790 PA~RAPH NJIIIBER:

6. 4, 1, 1, A SOOGESTED 8'0<FIT: ADD ,IJVS (OR AT LEAST LI"IT SWITCHES}

TO STEAPI SUPPLY VALVES. DISPOSITI~: 03/17/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW RESPCWSIBILiiY STATUS DATE r<<JD II -6 03/17/86 Ifi>ROVE IPERABILITY THROUGH REPAIR OF PIS PORVS AND PROVIDE STATUS OF AVAILABILIT Y ON TURNOVER StEETS. DATA COLl.£CTION DESCRIPTION ~D CODE MJll!BER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATI~ AND VALIDATI~ TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY REAARKS: VD-13 I IDIS INVCL VED: MRK QBER LOCATION C0'4JONENT NA,£ SYSTEJII PORVS ff ltJT IN INV FILE

• SUBSYSTEM
  • *
• HUIAH EN6IrEERIN6 DISCREPAt<<:Y REPORT SURRY UNIT3 al~ B 03/03/86 ASSESSfllENT LAST REVIEW HEil NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23803847 M1SSIN6 CONTRCl.S tUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN CP RESPONSE.

fff PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: EN6 I -4 BYPASS VALVES FOR IIIAIN STEAfl LINE TRIP VALVES A~ LIDUY OPERATED IN !WE~RDS BUILDING (APPROX 158 DES F), 8710 PARAGRAPH NI.JMBER: 6.4.1, l,A SIJHSTED BACKFIT: ADD l<<lVS IN CR FOR BYPASS Wl.VES. fff DISPOSITION: PROVIDE ~TE THROTTLE CAPABILITY <TRIP CLOSE) IN CR FOR BYPASS VALVES. IN VICI NITY IF PIS TRIP Wl.VES. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUMBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4. 1 ~TROLS SURVEY REJ!IARKS: VD-13-3 ITEflS INVCLVED: IIARK NJIIIBER LOCATION CQIRJENT NAME HIS-116 l-flS-155 1-IIIS-84 2-flS-116 2-flS-155 2-flS-184 ff N'.IT IN INV FILE_ t ff t<<lT IN INV FILE t ff N'.IT IN INV FILE t H l<<:IT IN INV FILE 1 _ff N'.IT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEJII 07/11/85

• *
• HED f() 231&3852 MISSING ~TRCILS tUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN CP RESPOEE. fff PROIUII DESCRIPTic>>I:

TITLE HUMAN E116INEERIN6 DISC~Y REPORT SURRY ~IT3 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW REBPŽlIBILITY STATUS DATE EN6

• II -7 87/11/85 II() ~RIii SILENCE PB IN CR. r(JT Et<<&t OC1<., RESET, TEST PBS IN CR. 87N PARAGRAPH OBER: 6.4.1.1. A SUB6ESTED BACKFIT: ADD Ufflll SILENCE PB AND ,ORE ~' RESET AND TEST PBS. fff DISPOSITION:

REFER TO PI-56-4 DATA al.LECTI~ DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE N.JU£R: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-4.1 ~TRCl.S SURVEY REMARKS: VD-13-4 IT91S INV<LVED: IIARK l'UIBER LOCATION ~NT NAflE ACIOOII.ED6E RESET SIL.Eta TEST ff f()T IN INV FILE t H f()T IN INV FILE t ff f()T IN INV FILE t ff f()T IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTE,i

• *
• HI.A 8'6INEERHE DISCREPAM:Y REPORT SURRY ~IT3 COI£ 03/03/86 ASSEss.ENT UlST REVIEW t£D NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATIIS DATE 23803867 INTENDED ACTI~ IUIAN ERROR: DELAY IN OP RESPONSE, f'OIM.JLATIN6 ERRCM:ll.lS RULES~ 6UIDN6 PRIICIPLES.

fff PROaEM DESCRIPTION: a>>JILT OCUATION Cf' BIT BYP IV TO COLD LEG RESULTS IN OREE IN HOT LES f'LOW. RELATil)EHIP IS COHF USINS, NOT APPARENT. 0780 PARASRAPH NUMBER: 6.6.3,2,A SU6GESTED BACl<FIT: ADD !()RDS TO LABEL ~/OR APPLICABLE PROCEDURES EXPLAINING SYSTEM EFFECTS OF CONTROL ACTUA TION. fff DISPOSITION: DELETE-POSSIBLY SIIIUTOR PROB. IN CR If' f'LOW PATH CH~, CHANG£ IN HOT LE 6 FL~ WOOLl) BE ~TICIPATED

• DATA cw.ECTIOH DESCRIPTI~ CODE fUIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATI0'4 VAI.IDATI0'4 TP-6,l LABELS~ LOCATION AIDS SURVEY RBIARKS:.

VD-12 ITEMS IN\lll.. VED: IIIAfll< fUIBER

• LOCATION COflla£NT t#.E SYSTEM ff r<<JT IN INV f'ILE t SUBSYST91 U/31/85
• *
• HED t<<:J 23813168 IUSSIN6 C()(TR(U ttJMAN ERROR: DELAY IN CJ) RE~ tt-t PROBLEJII DESCRIPTI~:

TITLE HI.A ENGINEERING DISCREPAtCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE A 03/03/86 ASSESSfllENT LAST REVIEW RE!3PCNSIBILITY STATUS DATE ENS II -5 07/11/85 STI! StJlPLY WS flll.JST BE ISOLATED LOCALLY. TURB DRVN AFW PP STI! SUPP WS r£ED EIT1£R MOVS 0 R LIMIT SWS ADDED 0780 PARAGRAPH f(Jl!BER: 6.4.1.1.A SU6GESTED BACKFIT: ADD l'IOVS OR Lil!IT SWITCH TO TD AFW PU!'IP STEAM SUPPLY VVS t-ff DISPOSITION: SEE PI-103-35 (20003061>

• DATA COLLECTIOO DESCRIPTION AND CODE OBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATION TP-4.1 ~TROLS SURVEY REMARKS: VD-13-1 I TOO INW. VED: l'.ARK tOIBER LOCATION CQIIIPMNT r.:l~ sn, SUPP w TD AFWP ff t()T IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* SYSTEJII SUBSYSTEM

/

• *
• HtM ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A01"82 SiltJLATOR/CR STANDARDIZATION.

ttJMN ERROR: NEGATIVE TRANSFER OF TRAINING. fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: ENG II -6 ( / SiltJLATOR DOES 1'JT ACCt/RATaY REFLECT CR DESISN -CI-M,ED TO CR ARE l'(]T IMMEDIATELY illADE T fff

• 0 SIIIJLATOR.

0700 PARAGRAPH NUl4BE:R: 6.8.2.4.B -SUGGESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE Sll'ti.JLATOR FIDELITY -ADJIIIN CONTROL DISPOSITION: UPGRADE Sill!ULATOR TO REFLECT CURRENT CONTROL.ROOM CXWTROL BOARDS; ALSO. FUTURE C ONTROL AND DISPLAY !'IODIFICATIONS SHO.JLD BE MADE IN SilllULATOR BEFORE THEY ARE INS TALLED IN THE CR. DATA COL-ECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NUl'IBER:

• TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION RE!'IARKS:

E-1. ITEMS 1 NVCl. VED: IIIARK '. Jfl!BER LOCATION COMPONENT NAIIE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM SH!!LATOR/CR ff NOT IN INV FILE* il/38/86

• *
• HU*IH EN6lNEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE C 03/03/86 ASScSSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A01004 PAf£L CODINB ClWSISTENCY HUMAN ERROR: Il'£REASED SEARCH TIIE. H4 PROBL.91 DESCRIPTI~:

NOD III-9 IMPll.SE ~R PRESS f(JRIZ PITR IS LOCATED IN TAN SECT !f' BB, ASSOC TURB STAGE PRESS IND 0 N VERT PN.. IS IN BRAY. 1700 PARASRAPH tUBER: 6.5.1.6,D.1 6.5.1,6,D.3 SU66£STED BACKFIT: CONSULT CR COLOR CODINB CONVENTION PLAN AND CHANBE PANB.COLOR AS APPROPRIATE. H4 DISPOSITION: AS SlJ66ESTED IN BACKFIT, PAINT AREA AROUND 1ST STAGE PRESSURE INDICATORS TAN

• DATA auECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NUf!BER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND V~IDATION TP-3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY TP-8.1 CONVENTIONS SURVEY REMARKS: VD-17 ITEJIIS INW. VED: _ NARK ro!BE:R LOCATION COP!PONENT NAIE SYSTEJII PANEL COLOR HNOT IN INV FILE* SUBSYSTEJII 05/28/85

• *
• HUMN ENHNEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSl!ENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A01NS EOOIPIENT ARRANGEMENT ERROR: DISPLAY SUBSTITUTION ERRORS. H£REASED SEARCH WE. tff PROBlEJII DESCRIPTION:

ENS I -5 Sil'IILARY RELATED EQUIP NOT BROUPED TD6ETt£R AND ARRANIEENT OF IDENTICll. INSTRlJIII BETWEEN D IFFERENT TRAINS DIFFER 07N PARABRAPH NUMBER: 6.8.2.l SUGGESTED BACKFIT: ENSURE SIMILAR INSTRUII! ARE BROUPED TOGETHER AND DIFFERENT TRAINS OF IDENTICAL EQUIP ARE AR RANBED IN SAME ORDER.

• fH DISPOSITION:

PERFORM EVll. OF B RCVRY PNI... PIODIFY "B" TRAIN TO AGREE WITH "A" TRAIN, PANEL IS NOT LAID OUT LOGICALLY. SEE PI-l9-t4 (2a113020l

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlfflBER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIIARKS: VD-19, ITEMS INVCl.VED: f!ARI< MJPIBER LOCATION ~NT NAME SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEM BOR RCVY PN1.. HNOT IN INV FILE* 05/28/85

• *
• ENiINEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED l'(I TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A01& DEJIIARCATIIJ4 tlJMAN ERROR: DISPLAYS SUBSTITUTION ERROR-READiffl THE WRONS DISPLAY, INCRE ASED SEARCH TIIE. fff PROBL91 DESCRIPTI!l4:

ENS II -6 THE LISTED DISPLAYS ARE l()T SROI.PED T06£THER, M<INS RAPID DISCRl!IIINATION OF SYSTEfll ASSOC! ATI~ DIFFICll.T, 0700 PARA6RAPH NUMBER: 6.6.6.2.A SUSGe:STED BACKFIT: ENCLOSE FUNCTIONll..LY RELATED.DISPLAYS WITH DEMARCATION LINES BETWEEN FI-1-496 & FI-1-961 H4 DISPOSITION: . HIERARCHICAL LABELING WILL BE Il'IPROVED, REFER TO LABELING SURVEY, PI-82 (20A0110 1) DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlmBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REJIARKS: VQ-25 ITEMS INV1l.VED: JIARK NIJIIIBf:R LOCATION COl!PONENT NAIE SYSTEJI SUBSYSTEM FI-1-943 ff NOT IN INV FILE* Fl-1-945 ff NOT IN INV FILE* F.I-1-946 ff NOT IN INV FILE* FI-1-961 ff l()T IN INV FILE* FI-1-962 ff l()T IN INV FILE

• Fl-1-963 ff NOT IN INV FILE* 05/28/85
• *
• HED t() 23Ae2855 OBSG..ETE DISPLAYS t<<.WlN ERROR: VISI.A. CLUTTER. fff PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:

TITLE HUMN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREMlCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE OPS REPORT THAT THE PLANT VENT SAflPLE ,i.()NlTOR IS NO LONGER USED. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUfl!BER: 6.5.1.1.C SOOSESTED BACKFIT: RaOVE DISPLAY FR!JI CR. fff DISPOSITION: RETAIN -DISPLAY fl!AY BE USED IN FUTURE

• DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJMlER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND Vj:t_IDATION REAARKS: VD-20 ITEJIIS INVCl. VED: IIIARK r-lJl'!BER LOCATION COMPOr£NT NAI£ SYST91 PLNT VNT SAJII ff NOT IN INV FILE* 03/03/86 ASSESSNENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE CQ!liPI..T 07/15/85 SUBSVST£ll1
• *
• HED t<<J HlM EtEINEERIN6 DISCREPAICY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B TITLE tUIAN ERROR: LISTED INDICATORS HPVE NO OPERATING U,IITS OR OPERATINS RANS E lilt£ !'ARK I N65. lff PROBt.91 DESCRIPTION:

03/03/86 ASSESSfENT LAST REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE . NOD II -7 07/15/85 THE ABOVE INDICATCRS HAVE NO OPERATING LIIHTS OR OPERATINS RAN6E ZOfE JIIARl<INGS. 0700 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER: 6. 5. 2. 3 SUS6ESTED BP.SKFIT: ADD HIGrl AND LOW LlfllIT BANDINS TO INDICATORS. lff DISPOSm~N: REFER TO PI-110 (20002007), DATA f JLLECTION DESCRIPTI~ AND CODE NIJIIBER: T J..9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION

• . P-5, 1 DISPLAYS SURVEY ID!ARKS: VD-26 ITEMS INVCl.VED:

~RI< NUMBER LOCATION C()IPOf£NT ,-ACCUM A LVL ACCIJII B LVL ACCUI! C LVL HNOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN ItfJ FILE* H f(JT IN INV FILE* SYSTBI SUBSYSTEM /

• *
• HUA EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT3 CODE B 63/13/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS OOTE 23Al2413 RATE OF CHANGE PERFQRIIRU AID ERROR: ERRORS IN DECIS1~IN6.

READit'1 ERRORS. , I Hf PROIUM DESCRIPTION: NOD I -2 OPS ADDED SLOPED LH£ TO COVER 6LASS ON TRS TO FACILITATE lll0NITORIN6, IF BACKFIT UIPORT, A DD PERll!Ar£NT LINE. 1700 PARAGRAPH NUfllBER: 6.5.1,1,B 6.6.6.2.C SUSGESTED BACKFIT: P£RMANENTLY AFFIX LINE TO RECORDER USirE RULER AND PROTRACTOR. Hf DISPOSITION: DELETE-RATHER THAN PUTTIN6 CURVE ON TRS, SEE RECOfillENDATIONS FOR PUTTIN6 CURVE I NERF CIJIPUTER. (VD-7 (230e2486l DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE rumER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION -TP-3,l ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEJIIS REVIEW TP-6,1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ROORl<S: VD-24 !TOO INVCl.VED: JIIARI< tUIBER LOCATION COMPOr£NT tM TR-1-413 TR-1-423 TR-I-433 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE~ HNOT IN lrN FILE i H r<<JT IN INV FILE* SYSTEJII SUBSYSTait 87/15/85

• * * . HUA EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A02415 POOR C:O.TAAST PEN RECORDER BETWEEN INK AND PAPER. .._ ERROR: ERROR IN IJl AESP()EE.

Hf PROBL91 DESCRIPTI~: NOD II -6 6RE£N JIIAAKERS DRYIN6 WT, PRODlCING PALE 6AEEN LINE/l'WlAKIAiICH IS NOT LE6IBL£ FAQIII ACROSS T 1£ BErOiBOARI). 0780 PARAGRAPH NlllmER: 6.5.4,1,A SUSGESTED BACKF IT: INSTALL 14AAKERS INTO RCRDRS THAT DO NOT DRY WT AS FAST,AND ARE BETIER IN CONTRAST TO Tl£ WHITE PAPER. Hf DISPOSITION: REFER TO PI-79-6 12"2403)

• DATA cou.ECTION DESCRIPTI~

AND CODE NUl'lBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATIOH AND VALIDATION TP-5.l DISPLAYS SURVEY R91AAKS: VD-28 ITEJIIS INVCl. VED: -f!ARK rtlMBER LOCATION COflPCIP£NT NAl'IE SYSTEIII HOT LES WR T H r<<JT IN INV FILE 1 SUBSYSTEM U/15/85

• *
• HIMW ENGINEERING DISCREPAPCY REPORT SURRY ~IT3 . CODE A 03/03/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW HED I'() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23Ai2917 Attt.t<<:IATOR LACKS RIN6BAD< tOIAN ERROR: FAILURE TO RESPOND TO DESRADED SYSTEfll CONDITION.
  • • PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:

NOD II -5 ~IATOR REQUIRES IIANJAL RESET. IF OP FORGETS TO RESET RETURN TO~ STATE IO'T INIT IATE 9UDITORY WARNING. fff 1700 PARAGRAPH NUl'IBER: 6.3.1.S SUSGESTED BACl<F IT: l()D L06IC, IN ANY STATE OF Ai.RIii SEG, HORN SOlNDS IF PROCESS STATE COOS FROf! r()RJII TO ABr<<JR Ill, (SEE REAARKSl DISPOSITION: IIIU. ENSURE THAT ANN.lfCIATOR RESPONSE PROCEDURE INSTRUCTS OP TO RESET THE ANNlJNC IATOR WTER CLEARING. DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE tt.JIIIBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-3.1 ANNUNICIATOR SYSTEl'IS REVIEW R91ARKS: VD-21. PROVIDE SPEC FLASH RATE FOR CLEARED ALARJIIS NOT RESET. ITEJIIS INVCl. VED: AARI< NIJIIIBER LOCATION CCJIIIPOtENT NAJIIE* SYSTEM SUBSYSTEfll PRZR SFTY W H N:JT IN INV FILE* 15/28/85

• *
• If.A ENSINEERIMi DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B "03/83/86 ASSESSfi!ENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A83848 HIGH RESISTIKE KEY OPERATED ~TROLS tU!AN ERROR: DELAYED OPERATOR RESPONSE.

fff PROBLEJII DESCRIPTI~: NOD II -7 CTRLS ON SIMULATOR DIFFIW. T TO TURN. UP AND R£ACHES RESISTIKE ABOVE IIIAX RECOIIIEHDE D 6 It0£S/PIUID. 8700 PARAGRAPH l'OIBER: 6.4.4.3 SUGGESTED BACl{FlT: DETERPIINE IF PROBWI EXISTS FOR SHULAR CTR1..S UNIT 1. IF IT EXISTS THEN JIIODIFY/REPUlCE C ONTRCl.S/RECUT KEYS. '** DISPOSITION: REFER TO C-21 122A0.'32i7l DATA CCX..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIBER: TP-4. l CONTROLS SURVEY REfllARKS: DS.-19, 0700 61.JIDELINE NO. StOULD READ: 644363 I IDIS INVCk. VED: ~RK l'OIBER LOCATION C(Jf)(lf£NT NAIE 3*sI ACOI SW ASS BD TV HNOT IN INV FILE 1 ff t{)T IN INY FILE 1 HNOT IN INV FIi.£ I ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM B S6 BD TV C SS BD TV PCV-2455C PCV-2456 TAA317 CONTROL ~TOR CO(LANT IPRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR) SYS RELIEF Wl.VES TAA316 CCWTRCL ~TOR COOLANT (PRIIIIARY LOOP, PWR> SYS . RELIEF Wl.VES SW 43-15J3 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 07/11/85

• *
• HIJA ENSINEERINJ DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSIENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A03192 AMBIGLOOS

~TRCUER OPERATING CHARAl;TERISTICS. It.A ERROR: WRCN3 DIRECTION Of CONTROL ACTIVATION. l!ISINTERPRETATION OF DISPLAYED OUTPUT. Hf PROBL91 D£SCRIPTION: ENS . SELECTI~ OF PIIN FLO OFTEN RESULTS IN DISPLAY OUTPUT OF 1* FUU. OPEN/FULL CLOSE. 07"8 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER:

6. 4. 2. 1 6. 6. 3. 8. B SUGGESTED BACKFIT: II -6 REVISE OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF APPLICABLE CNTRLRS WHEREBY 0::F!J.L CLOSE, 100:=FULL OP EN. LABEL APPROPRIATELY Hf DISPOSITION:

A_L INVERSEACTINS CTRLRS ARE iO BE LABELED AS SUCH. ALLR£VERSE ACTING CTRLRS WI LL BE IDENTIFIED BY NOD. REFER TO C-12 (20A03049)

• ~rA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NIJPI.BER:

TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-6.l LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY REJIIARKS: VD-14, CAUTION: rESATIVE TRANSFER AAJOR COICERN IN R£SOI.VIN6 lTf 4S INVCl. VED: -II< N.J"8ER LOCATION ~T NAPIE HASAN PCS PRZR l'ISTR PR RHR HX BYP sn, HDR PRES ff NOT IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* ff NOT IN INV FILE* SYSTEPI S1JBSYST0I 01/30/86

• *
• HlJIAN ENGIHEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/03/86 SURRY LWIT3 CODE B ASS£ssnENT LAST REVIEW HED t() TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE .
• 23Al3211 POSITION INDICATI~

IDAN ERROR: EXCESSIVE/INADEQUATE COHIN.JAta Of CONTROL ACTION. f'1SINTER PRETATION IF CONTR(L POSITION. fH PROBL91 DESCRIPTION: II -6 KEY SWITCH POSITION DOES tt'.IT fl!ATCH REFERENC£ POSITION AS DEPICTED BY POSITION LABELS ON TH E CONTROL PANEL 0700 PARAGRAPH NUl'IBER: . 6.4,1,l,A.2 6.4.4.5.D.2 6.9.2.2.B,l SU66ESTED BACKF IT: REORIENT KEV OP SWITCHES SO POSITION OF KEV HOLE AATCHES POSITION LABELS ON CONTROL BlllRD. fff DISPOSITION: ESTABLISH CONVENTION -L.ABa AND AARK TOP. PROVIDE POSITIVE INDICATION OF POS ITION. SEE DIAGR~ IN HED REPORT. REFER TD LABELINS STUDY PER PI-Be (20A9110ll

• DATA COLL£CTION DESCRIPTION CODE UBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4.l CONTROLS SURVEY REJIIARKS:

VD-15-l, ADDITIONAL 0700 6UID£L1N£: 6443F I TEJIIS !NW. VED: !!ARK fUIBER LOCATION CIJi'IIPClf8T ,-PCV-1455C PCV-1456 ff N'.IT IN INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FiLE 1 SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM / il/31/86

• *
• HlJlllAH ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3. CODE 8 03/03/86 ~SSPiENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A03211 POSITION INDICATION. ERROR: EXCESSIVE/INADEQUATE CONTIMJAN:E IF CONTROL ACTION. PIISINTER PRETATION IF ~TRCl. POSITION.

1 fff PRCIBLEJII DESCRIPTION: ENG II -7 THIJIIB SW & IND LTS POSITIONS DO NOT MTCH REFERENCE POSITION D£PICTED ON POS LABELS ON CB. 4 FIKTION HAS 5 POS. fff 8700 PARAGRAPH NU"8£R: 6.4.1.l.A.2 6.4.4.5.D.2 6.9.2.2,B.l SU6G£STED BACl<FIT: REARRANGE IND LTS: SL.CM LEFT OF FAST & FAST LEFT OF OFF RELABEL CTRL SW POS SO THUPIBSW POI NTS DIRECTLY AT SW POS . DISPOSITION: l(JDIFY POSTNS, ALIGN ARROW W/ POSTN LABELING, REWIRE SW, RELABEL LTS, REIOVE 5TH POSTN. SEE DIAGRAfl IN HED REPORT DATA COl..1.ECTION DESCRIPTION CODE MfflBER: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4.1 CONTROLS SURVEY RENARKS: VD-15. ADDITIOtR. 0700 BLINE: 6443F ITEMS IN'v'Cl.VED: 11'.ARK IUIBER LOCATION COIIIPOfENT rM SYST~ ff NOT IN INV FiLE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t . FM283 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEflllal. AND VOLLIIE ~Rll. SYSTEII FAB283 DISCRETE ROTARY CHEJIIICAL AND VOLIJIE CONTRil. svsm SUBSYSTEM BORATION BORATION i:l/28/85

• *
• HIJAAN EN6INE£RIN6 DISCREPANCY R£PORT SURRY ~IT3 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSMENT

~T REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23Ai3212 POSITION INDICATION '** ERROR: EXCESSIVE/I~TE CONTINI.IAM:E rF ~TRCM.. ACTION. PIISINTERP RETATION rF ~TRO.. POSITION. ffl PROBl.91 DESCRIPTION: EN6 II -7 TIDIB SWITCH POSITI~ DO NOT f!ATCH REFERErcE POSITION AS DEPICTED BY POSTION LABELS ON TH E cnmn. PANEL, 8780 PARAGRAPH NUPIBER: 6.4.1,1,A,2 6.4.4.5.D.2 6.9.2,2,B,l SUSGE:STED .BACKF IT: RELABEL CONTROL SWITCH POSITIOhS SO THUMB SWITCH POINTS DIRECTLY AT SWITCH POSITION, lff DISPOSITION: ALIGN ARROW WITH POSITION LAB8.IN6, REWIRE SWITCH, RELABEL LISHT AND ADD 3RD LIS HT. SEE DIAS~ ON HED REPORT

• DATA COLLECTION D£SCRIPTI0N AND CODE rtlPIBER:

TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION . TP-4,1 CONTRfl.S SURVEY REJIIARKS: VD-15. ADDITIONAL 0780 61.JIDELINE: 6443F IT91S INVO * .'JED: * ~Rt< OBcR LOCATION Cl)l!IJOENT ,-SYSTEM 1-CS-P-2A l-CS-P-2B 2-cs-P-2A 2-CS-P-28 ff NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE* CM105 DISCRETE ROTARY CONTAitfENT SPRAY SYSTEM CAA106 DISCRETE ROTARY CONTAil'fENT SPRAY SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 15/28/85

• *
• HUMAN ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSAENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23Al3213 THROTTLE VS. IOENTARY WiTACT SWITDI. tUIAN ERROR: INADE~TE JIIAGNITUDE CONTRll. ACTION. Hf PROa.91 DESCRIPTION:

NOD II -6 . THERE IS N'.I WAY OF DISTIN6UISH1ft3 IIOPENTARY ~TACT <I.E., SBLINS> VAl.V£S FRO" THROTTLE V ~VES. i780 PA~RAPH tOIB£R: 6.4.l,l,C,l 6.6.3.8.A 6.6.1,1 SU66ESTED .BACKFIT: ADD SYIIBOLS AND/OR LABEL TO SWITCHES TO HELP DIFFERENTIATE THROTTLE SWITCHES FROM IIIOIEHTAR Y CONTACT TYPES. fff DISPOSITION: ADD A LABEL WITH A SYIIBOL FOR IIIOIIENTARY (E.B., .) OR THROTTLE (E,S., +). PUT LAB EL BETWEEN INDICATOR LISHTS. REFER TO L.ABELil'E STUDY PER PI-82 120A01101), DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE ruBfR: TP-9.2 VERIFICATION AND V~IDATION T~'+.1 CONTROLS SURVEY TP-6.1 LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS SURVEY ~RKS: VD-16 IIDIS INV!l.VED: ~RK NUPIB£R LOCATION CCJIPOrENT NA,£ IIOV-1864A Jil)IJ-18648 IIOV-1869A ,Kl\J-18698

• ,ov-1898A l'IOV-189&8 IIOV-CW-10eA

!tlOY-CW-lHB ,iQV-CW-10<<: l'IOV-CW-l 00D IIIOV-FW-151A ff NJT IN INV FILE 1 ff t<<JT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN* INV FILE 1 ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT JN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE 1 ff r<<JT IN INV FILE t 11 t<<JT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t 11 NOT IN INV FILE t ff NOT IN INV FILE t SYSTEM SUBSYSTE/JI 81/30/86

• *
• HED NO: 23A03213 ITEPIS INVCl.VED:

HlM EN6IN£ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 ~RK rtJIIIB*R LOCATION C()!ill)()ENT NAfE SYSTEPI IIIOV-f'W-151B !Cv-flH51C IIIOV-f'w-151D IIIOV-fW-151E IIIOV-flH51F IOH1S-li3B IIIOV-i1S-li4B ff MJT IN INV FILE t H t()T IN INV FILE* HNOT IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE t ff MJT IN INV FILE t HNOT IN INV FILE t ff t()T IN INV FILE t 03/03/S6 SUBSYSTEll

• *
• ENiIN£ERirE DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY UNIT3 CODE B 03/03/86 ASSESSAENT LAST REVIEW HED NO TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS ~TE 23A03214 CCNTR(l. POSITIONS NOT USED. ltM ERROR: INADVERTANT CONTR(l. ACTIVATION.

EXCESSIVE ~TlrtJAN:E OFCONT Rll. ACTION. '** PROBL£111_DESCRIPTI0N: I -5 THE AUTO PODE ON THESE SW1TCf£S IS ACTIVE, IOEVER PROCEDURES CAUTION OPS t()T TO PUlCE SWI TDi IN AUTO. I*+ 0710 PARASRA.OH NU"8ER: 6.4.1.1.A SU66ESTED BACKFIT: DISABLE AUTO LOGIC. DISPOSITION: INVESTIGATE lfiETHER AUTO Ft.H:TION IS EVER TO BE USED, IF MJT POSITION SHOJU> BE DISABLED. ALSO, FROII MAN-OFF-AUTO TO OFF-PIAN-AUTO IF AUTO IS TO BE USED. DATA CClLECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE fOIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATIO-. TP-4,1 CONTROLS SURVEY RB!ARKS: VD-22 ITEMS IrMl..YED: !ARI< NlJIIIBER LOCATION COf!POM:NT ,-CS-25-6182 CS-25-6IT248 H l'()T IN INV FILE f ff NOT IN INV FILE* svsm, SUBSYSTEM 11/11/85

• *
• HlMAN EN6INEERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY LNIT3 CODE B ASSE~T LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23Ae3218 SErEIR. l()IJEJIIENT RELATIONSHIPS/ROTARY

~TROI..S ttJIIIAN ERROR: IIAY RESPCHiE INCl)!PATIBLE WITH CPERATORS EXPECTATIONS, TIEREFORE, ERROR. fff PROBL.91 DESCRIPTION: NOD II -6 lfiEN OP TURfE 00B COUNTERCLOCt<WISc, IIITR NEEDLE TRAVELS LEFT TO RT -NOT REPRESEHTATIVE OF OTHER~ KNOBS. 17110 PARAGRAPH NUl!IB£R: 6.9.3, 1,A SU6GEST£D BACKf IT: AN#l.YZE REllJIR£JIIENTS FOR Ct4MiIN6 THES£ CONTROLS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL SHULAR HASAN D I~ ~TROI..S/DISPLAYS. fff DISPOSITION: REFER TO VD-14 (23A031e2) DATA a:l.LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIBER: TP-9,2 VERIFICATION AND ~IDATIOk R91ARKS: VD-27 I TEJIIS I tMl. YED: IIARK 1'4.JMBER LOCATION ~T SYSTEII SUBSYSTEA STII HDR PRSS HNOT IN INV FILE t / U/15/85

• ** llWAA E~IN*ERIN6 DISCREPANCY REPORT 03/21/86 SURRY lftIT J amE B ASSESSMENT LAST REVIEW TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 23A06811 SAFETY INJECTION RESET TIIE na.AY tlJIII.AN ERROR: DELAY IN RESPIHIE TIIIIE MAY RESUI.T IN RCS OOING SOLID lff PROBLal DESCRIPTION:

NONE CPT-OPS REPORT 5 MitllTE TIME Jl£1.AY REQUIRED FOR RESETTING SI IS Ml LONGER NEEDED sna THE BIT HAS BEEN DISABL£D. 1700 PARAGRAPH NUMBER: 6.4.1.1.e.1 SUS6ESTED BACKFIT: EITHER REIIOYE OR SHORTEN 5 MIN.ITE DELAY. lff DISPOSITION: TIME DELAY HAS BEEN CHll&D. TO 1 MIM.ITE

• DATA al.LECTI~

DESCRIPTION iwD CODE NUl'IBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND WUDATION TP-4.1 COOTROLS SURVEY REPARKS: VD-23 IT ENS INVOLVED: LOCATION COflPONENT NAflE SYSTEM SI RESET TD ff r<<JT IN INV FILE *! SUBSYSTEJII 03/17/86 r * ..... ** ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY ~IT 3 CODE B 03/17/86 ASSES$11ENT LAST REVIEW l£D NJ TITLE RESPONSIBILITY STATUS DATE 238'111Nl IJERTial. PAtEL ACCESS AND CIRCllATION PATTERNS. ERROR: EN6 II -6 FAILURE TO f()NITOR. NISINTERPRETIN6 STATUS, FATIGUE, t+t PROBLBI DESCRIPTION: fff ., l()RIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN BENCHBOARD AND VERTICAL BOARDS EXTREJIIE Ol=TEN MKING TASKS A TI<<l PERSON CPERATIIJo 1 TO CONTROL, OTl£R TO. OITOR. 8780 PARAGRAPH NJNBER: 6,1,1,3,D SU66ESTED BACl<FIT: SEPARATE BEtO!BOARD INTO TWO CONSOL.ES WITH PASSA6E BETWEEN TO FACILITATE EFFICIENT AND UNO BSTRUCTED fllOValENT, DISPOSITION: INFOR!IIATION ,OST CFTEN USED AND ROST IMPORTANT FOR OPERATORS l4lS BEEN RECCJIIIIIIENDE D FOR INSTAU.ATION CW BErO!BOARD. SPLITIIN6 BENCHBOARD l'(JT POSSIBLE, REFER TO Pl -119, (28081205, 20001220, 20001221, 20001222) DATA CCk..LECTION DESCRIPTION AND CODE NlJIIBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION VALIDATION .TP-1, l WRKSPACE SURVEY REJIIARKS: W-1 ITEPIS I NVCl. \/ED: SYSTEIII SUBSYSTEM tt NJT IN INV FILE f 03/17/86 HED NO 23V032a2 ccr.TROL ADEQUACY Ht.M,i ERROR: DELAY IN RE~ THE fff PROBWI DESCRIPTI~: ENSINEERINS DISCREPANCY REPORT SURRY llt!IT3 CODE C TITLE !B3/03/86 ASSESSF.'El<l'T I.AfT llt-VIEH RESPONSIBILITY STATUS rune ENS III-9 LISTED TURB DRAIN VALVES MUST BE fj:WI) OCTUATED. t0Tt£R 4 VALVES AREA MOi'fflTIC) OP itJST LI< TO DIRD TO PIANIRL Y ACTUATE. 1780 PARAGRAPH NlJIIIBER: 6.4.1.1.A 6.4.1.1.C SU6SESTED BACl{FIT: IF NOT TECtfdCALL Y PROHIBITED, PROVIDE AUTOMATIC LOGIC. *** DISPOSITION: /' IF NOT TECHNICALLY PROiIBITED, PROVIDE AUTO CP£RATIN6 LDSIC ON TURBINE TRIP. .,.,. -~ ,/..,.~ DATA auECTI~ DESCRIPTION AND CODE NJMBER: TP-9. 2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TP-4,1 ~TROLS SURVEY ~RKS: VD-2 ITOO INVOLVED: .w:\RK M.>>!BER LOCATION coitm£NT ~'£ IIICIV-SD-102A IIIOV-SD-102B H r<<JT IN INV FILE i ff NOT IN INV FILE 11 SYSID1 SUBSYST8'1}}