ML17334A494: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:PROGRAMPLANREPORTforaDETAILEDCONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWforIndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyDonaldC. | {{#Wiki_filter:PROGRAMPLANREPORTforaDETAILEDCONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWforIndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyDonaldC.CookUnits1and2toTheUnitedStatesNuclearRegulatory Commission Revision1Oecember2,1983preparedbyAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation andWestinghouse | ||
~ | 'lectricCorporation CanyonResearchGroup840i04019h 83i229,PDRADQCK050003i5F---'PDR TABLEOFCONTENTSSectionTitle~PaeINTRODUCTION l-l.General1-2.1-6.1-9.Background 1-3.PlantDescription 1"4.Definition ofControlRooms1-5.ControlRoomStatusScopeoftheProgramObjectives oftheProgramDCRDRProgramActivities Definition ofTerms1-21-21-21"31-31-41-51-7MANAGEMENT ANDSTAFFING2-1.Purpose2-2.DCRDRTeamInterfaces 2-3.Management Function2-4.ProjectReviewTeam2-5.DesignReviewTeam2-6.Assessment Team2-12-12-12-12-22-22-4DOCUMENTATION ANDDOCUMENTCONTROL3-1.Introduction 3-2.Reference Documentation 3-3.DCRDR-Generated Documentation 3-4.DocumentControl3-13-13"13-23-3DESCRIPTION OFPHASEI,PLANNING4-1.Introduction 4-2.DCRDRMilestones 4-3.ControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport4-14-14-16755B:1/112583 TABLEOFCONTENTS(cont)SectionTitle~paeDESCRIPTION OFPHASEII,REVIEW5-1.Introduction 5-2.ReviewPhaseStaffing5-3.Methodology forReviewPhaseTasks5-4.Task1--Operating Experience Review5-5.Task2-SystemFunctionandTaskAnalysis5-6.Task3-ControlRoomInventory, 5-7.Task4--ControlRoomHumanFactorsSurvey5-8.Workspace Survey5-9.Anthropometric Survey5-10.Emergency Equipment Survey5-11.Heating,Ventilating, andAirConditioning Survey5-12.Illumination Survey5-13.AmbientNoiseSurvey5-14.Maintainability Survey5-15.Communications Survey5-16.Annunciator SystemsReview5-17.ControlsSurvey5-18.DisplaysSurvey5-19.LabelsandLocationAids5-20.ComputerSystemReview5-21.Conventions Survey5-22.Task5--Verification ofControlRoomFunction5-23.Task6--Validation ofControlRoomFunctions 5-24.ProductsoftheReviewPhase5-15-15-15-25-25-35-35-35-45-45-55-45-55-55-55-55-65-65-65-65-65-75-75-75-76755B:1/112583 TABLEOFCONTENTS(cont)SectionTitle~PaeDESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-A,ASSESSMENT 6-1.Introduction 6-2.Methodology 6-16-16-2DESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-B,IMPLEMENTATION 7-1DESCRIPTION OFPHASEIV,REPORTING 8-1COORDINATION WITHNUREG0737,SUPPLEMENT 1,ACTIVITIES 9-110QUALITYASSURANCE 10-1SUMMARYAppendixALiSTOFABBREVIATIONS A-1AppendixBRESUMESOFKEYPERSONNEL B-lAppendixCANNUNCIATOR SURVEYTASKPLANC-16755B:1/112583 LISTOFILLUSTRATIONS Fi<iureTitie~PaeRelationship ofNUREG0660TaskActionItems1-2GeneralArrangement DrawingofDonaldC.CookUnits1and2ControlRooms1"3Functional LayoutDrawingofDonaldC.CookUnit1ControlRoomPanels1-13Functional LayoutDrawingofDonaldC.CookUnit2ControlRoomPanels1-151-5ListofAbbreviations andFunctions forControlPanels1-171-6FourMajorPhaseActivities fortheDCRORProgram1-192-1OCRDRProgramOrganization Structure 2-52-2DCRDRProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringPlanning2-72-3OCRORProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringReview2-9OCRORProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringAssessment 2-112"5OCRDRProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringImple-mentation 2-132-6DCRDRProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringReporting 2-154-1PlanningPhaseDevelopment Outline4-34-2OCRDRProgramScheduleforPhasesIandII4-56755B:1/112583 LISTOFILLUSTRATIONS (cont)~FiureTitle~pae6-1Assessment Methodology Chart6-36-2HumanEngineering Discrepancy Evaluation FlowChart6-56-3HEOCategoryGuidelines 6-78"1SampleofProgramSummaryReportFormat(2Sheets)8-39-1ScheduleofPerformance 9-36755B:1/112583viii SECTIONIINTRODUCTION 1-1.GENERALThisProgramPlanReportdescribes theplantoperformadetailedcontrolroomdesignreview(OCROR)oftheDonaldC.CookUnits1and2nuclearpowergeneration stationsoperatedbytheIndianaandMichiganElectricComoany(IEMECo).ThepurposeoftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramistostudyandevaluate, fromahumanengineering pointofview,thetotalcontrolroomworkspace,environment, instrumentation, | ||
~NUREG0737, | : controls, andotherequipment forbothsystemdemandsandoperatorcapabilities andtoidentify, assess,andrecommend controlroomdesignmodifications/enhancements tocorrectidentified inadequacies intheexistingdesign.TheapproachoftheDCRORProgramwillbetoperformatotalreviewontheUnit1controlroom.ThenareviewoftheUnit2controlroomwillbedonetodetermine thedifferences betweenunits.TheUnit2controlroomreviewwillbebasedontheresultsoftheUnit1review,withalldifferences beingaddressed separately. | ||
~ | Therefore, thisreviewtechnique willensurethatallasoecsofheUnits1and2control.oomswillbeevaluated forhuaanrac:ors.Thisprogramispartofanintegrated plantoaddresstheTMI-related actionsreferenced inTMI-2ActionPlan,NUREG-0660. | ||
~ | Theplanwillincludeaconsideration oftherelationship ortheDCRORProgramwithNUREG0737,Supplement 1(figure1-1),including thefollowing: | ||
~Conrolboarddesign~Humanfactors~Plantoperations( | I~Designing controlroommodifications whichcorrecconditions adversetosafety(reducing significant contributions torisk)andconsidering theadditionoftheinstrumentation necessary toimplement Regulatory Guide1.976755B:I/062883 | ||
~Verifying thesafetyparameter displaysystem(SPOS),datadisplay,andfunction~Usingselectedplant-specific, symptom-based emergency operating procedures forverifying andvalidating controlroomfunctions | |||
~Communication interface withtheTechnical SupportCenter,Emergency Operations | |||
: Facility, andtheOperating SupportCenterIKMECohascommittedthenecessary resources, including Ynowleageable management andtechnical personnel fromtheplantstaff,AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation (AEPSC).technical consultants fromWestinghouse ElectricCorporation, andhumanactorsspecialists FromCanyonResearchGrouptoeffectheprogramcefinedherein.1-2.BACKGROUNO 1-3PlantOes-,i-tonTheIndianaanaMichiganElectricCompanyiscurrently ooerating atwo-unitnuclearpowerplantlocatedalongtheeasternshoreofLakeMichiganinLakeTownship, BerrienCounty,Michigan, approximateiy | |||
'milessouth-sou hwestorBentonHarbor.ThisFaciliyhasbeendesignated theDonaldC.CookUr.i:s1and2wnichbegancommercial operation inAugustof1975andJulyor1979,'esoectively. | |||
=achunitcontainssWestinghouse-supplied four-loop nuclearsteamsuoplysystem(Unit1-3250M<t,1030KdeNetandUnit2-3411'Kft,1100i&feNet). | |||
'oneturbinegenerators forUnits1and2wererurnisned oyGeneral"=;ectric ancBrownBoveri,respectively. | |||
Thearchitect~'engineer Forbothuni:sisAEPSC.1-4.Oefinition ofControlRoomsTheOonaldC.CookUnits1and2controlroomsareessentially identical. | |||
Thecontrolroomforeachunitisdefined,ForthepurposesoftheOCRDRProgram,6755B:I/0628831-2 asthepanelsandotherequipment inthemaincontrolboardareaincluding theSPDSdisplaysandthehotshutdownpanels.Ageneralarrangement drawingisillustrated infigure1-2;functional layoutdrawingsofthecontrolroompanelsareshowninfigures1-3and1-4,andacomprehensive tabulation ofthismaterialisshowninfigure1-5.1"5.ControlRoomStatusThemaincontrolboardsareoperational andcompleteexceptforthoseareasofactivitywhicharenowbeingperformed toaddresstherequirements setforthbyNUREG0737,Supplement 1.1-6.SCOPEOFTHEPROGRAMTheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramcoversthehumanengineering reviewoftheverticaloperational andassociated hotshutdownpanelsidentified inparagraph 1-4,andthecontrolroomworkspace andenvironment. | |||
Theequipment tobereviewedincludesalldisplays, | |||
: controls, peripheral | |||
: consoles, communication equipment, ancillary devices,andothermaincontrolboardcomponents withwhichthecontrolroomoperators interface. | |||
Duringthereviewprocess,thegovernment regulations andguidelines listedbelowandotherrelatedindustrystandards andguidelines willbeusedforinformation orbackground: | |||
~NUREG0659(staffsupplement to1580)~NUREG0660(actionplanasaresultofTMI-2accident) | |||
~NUREG0694(TMI-related requirement fornewoperating licensees) | |||
~NUREG0696(functional criteriaforemergency responsefacilities)" | |||
~NUREG0700(controlroomhumanengineering guidelines) | |||
~NUREG0737(clarification ofTMIactionplanrequirements) 6755B:I/062883 1-3 | |||
~NUREG0737,Supplement I(requirements foremergency responsecapability) eNUREG0801(draftevaluation criteriaforcontrolroomdesignreview)~NUREG0814(methodology forevaluation ofemergency responsefacilities) | |||
~NUREG0835(humanfactorsacceptance criteriaforSPDS)~NUREG0899(guidelines forthepreparation ofemergency operating procedures) | |||
~Regulatory Guide1.47(bypassed andinoperable statusindication) | |||
~Regulatory Guide1.97,Revision2(postaccident monitoring instrumentation) 1-7.OBJECTIVES OFTHEPROGRAMTheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramwillbeconducted toachievethefollowing objectives: | |||
~Determine whethertheexistingcontrolroomdesignprovidesthesystemstatusinformation, controlcapabilities, | |||
: feedback, andanalytical aidsnecessary forcontrolroomoperators toperformtheirfunctions effectively | |||
~Identifycharacteristics oftheexistingcontrolroominstrumentation, | |||
: controls, otherequipment, andphysicalarrangements whichmaysignificantly impair/impede controlroomoperatorperformance | |||
~Analyzeandevaluatetheproblemswhichcouldoccurduringemergency conditions, andidentifymeansofcorrecting thosediscrepancies whichcouldleadtosubstantial operational orsafetyconcerns6755B:I/062883 1-4 | |||
~Verifyandvalidatetheproposedmeansofcorrection toprovideaneffective planofactionwhichapplieshumanfactorsprinciples toimprovethecontrol'oom designandenhanceoperatorefficiency andeffectiveness | |||
~Integrate theOCRDRProgramwithotherareaofhumanfactorsidentified intheNRCTaskActionPlan~Provideeffective coordination ofcontrolroomenhancements and/ormodifications withidentifications ofNUREG0696andRegulatory Guide1.97considerations, plantoperating/emergency procedures development, andtheimplementation oftrainingasnecessary toensurethatcontrolroomoperators canfunctionadequately withanycontrolroomdesignchanges~EnsurethattheresultsofthistotaleffortmeettheintentofNUREG0737,ItemI.D.l,andNUREG0700.Inaddition, performtheOCRORProgramcognizant ofthesedocuments asclarified inNUREG0737,Supplement 1,Item5.2.a1-8.OCRORPROGRAMACTIVITIES Thedesignreviewprocesswilladdressfourmajorphasesofactivity(figure1-6):oPHASEIPLANNiNG(section,4).TheProgramPlanReportfortheD.C.CookUnits1and2DCRORandthepreliminary ControlRoomHumanEngineering Criteria(CRHEC)Reportwillprovidethebasisforthedesignreview.~PHASEII--REVIEW(section.5).DuringtheReview'hase, datawillbecollected, reduced,andanalyzedtoobserveanddocumentwhethertheexistingcontrolroomdesignprovidesoperators withthecapabilities necessary toperformtheirfunctionandtasksundernormaland67558:1/062883 1-5 emergency operating conditions. | |||
ResultsofPhaseIIactivitywillgeneratetasksummaryreportsandalistingofdepartures fromtheControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport.~PHASEIII-A-ASSESSMENT (section6).Ouringthisphase,anassessment willbemadeofthesignificance andimpactofthedepartures fromtheCRHECreportsidentified inPhaseII.Forthose'departures assessedassignifi-cant,recommended designchanges/enhancements willbedeveloped. | |||
oPHASEIII-B--IMPLEMENTATION (section7).Aftertheassessment hasIIbeencompleted andallcorrective actionsidentified, aschedulewillbedeveloped toensuretheintegration oftheproposedcontrolroomchangeswithotherpost-TMIprograms, refueling outages,andothercompanymodifications. | |||
~PHASEIVREPORTING (section8).AProgramSummaryReportwillbepreparedwhichwilldocumenttheoverallreviewprocess,describeandidentifyallofthehumanengineering discrepancies'and | |||
: findings, andsummarize allOCRORactivities, methodologies, andproposedcontrolroomimprovements andschedules. | |||
Eachphasewillbeperformed byateamofspecialists fromI&MECo,AEPSC,Westinghouse, andCanyonResearchGroup.Oisciplines represented ontheteamwillincludeinstrumentation andcontrolengineering, nuclearsafetyandli-censing,electrical engineering, humanfactors,plantoperations, qualityassurance, projectengineering, andtrainingtomaximizetheefficiency oftheeffortandtocompletethetotalreviewidentified inthisProgramPlanReport.6755B:I/062883 1-6 I"9.DEFINITION OFTERMSAlistofabbreviations andacronymsiscontained inappendixAtothisreport.Also,toalleviate ambiguity ofterms,thefollowing definitions areprovided: | |||
ControlRoomEnhancement. | |||
Achangetoapiece'ofequipment, suchasacontrolpanel,whichcanbeperformed withoutinterfering withtheoperation ofthatequipment. | |||
Suchchangesmightincludetheapplication oflabelsordemarcation lines.ControlRoomModification. | |||
Achangetoapieceofequipment, suchasacontrolpanel,whichislikelytointerfere withtheoperation ofthatequipment onwhichthechangeisbeingperformed. | |||
Suchchangesincludetheremovalorrelocation ofanexistingcontrolpanelcomponent ortheadditionofapanelcomponent. | |||
EmerencOperatinProcedures. | |||
Plantprocedures whichguide,theoperator(s) duringatransient oremergency condition. | |||
EmerencResponseGuidelines.Symptom-based guidelines fromwhichemergency operating procedures aredeveloped. | |||
HumanEnaineerin | |||
.Thescienceofoptimizing theperformance ofhumanbeingsandthedesignofequipment formoreefficient usebyhumanbeings'uman Enoineerin Discreanc.Adeparture fromtheestablished humanfactorscriteriaforthecontrolroomdesignwhichcouldimpair/impede operatorperformance. | |||
Photomosaic. | |||
Ascaledphotographic reproduction ofthemaincontrolroompanels.SafetParameter DislaSstem.Displaysystemwhichprovidescontinuous indication ofplantparameters toassistcontrolro'ompersonnel inevaluating thesafetystatusoftheplant.6755B:I/0628831-7 Validation. | |||
Theprocessofdetermining whetherthephysicaldesignsupportstheprocedures foroperation inanadequatemannertosupporteffective integrated performance ofthefunctions ofthecontrolroomoperating crew.Verification. | |||
Theprocessofdetermining whetherinstrumentation, | |||
: controls, andotherequipment meetthespecificrequirements ofthetasksperformed byoperators. | |||
6755B:1/062883 PLANT'CIFICEMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES (EOPs)NUREG0899SYMPTOM-BASED OPERATING ANDEMERGENCY PROCEDURES NUREG0799NUREG0660I.C.1,I.C.8,&I.C.9CHANGESINREQUIREMENTSFORTRAININGANDSTAFFINGNUREG0660I.A.1&IA.2TMIACTIONPLANNUREG0660NUREG0737DETAILEDCONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWPRELIMINARY CONTROLROOMHUMANENGINEERING CRITERIAREPORTPROGRAMPLANREPORTNUREG0700PRCAPERTURECARDDCRDRPROGRAM SUMMARYREPORT'OST-ACCIDENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION REG.GUIDE1.97'AlsoAvailable 6zApertureCardSAFETYPARAMETER DISPLAYSYSTEMNUBEG0660,III,A.12NUREG0835EMERGENCY RESPONSEFACILITYNUREG0696NUREG0814Figurel-l.Relationship ofNUREG0660TaskActionItems1-9s401040196 | |||
-o) 0PN UNIT1CONTROLROOMUNIT2CONTROLROOMUNIT2HOTSHUTDOWNAREAUNIT1HOTSHUTDOWNAREAFigure1-2.GeneralArrangement DrawingofDonaldC.CookUnits1and2ControlRooms BARCOTUSGPRZFPRCPCPRHROPERATOR'S CONSOLEPSSOCRTASISSPYPSSCRTBRMSBISICRTCRTCRTCCWESWNESWCOMPUTEROPERATOR'S CONSOLETYPEWRITER SANISIVVSSVEFRMSCABINETFFCMFXAPOMSFlCWFigure1-3.Functional LayoutOrawingofOonaldC.CookUnit1ControlRoomPanels6755B:1/0628831-13 PANELFFCMFXAPDMSFIDCABINETCWSVEFVSIVNISSANESWTYPEWRITER | |||
+COMPUTEROPERATOR'S CONSOLEESWCCWBISIBISIRMSCRTCRTPSSDCRTBSPYSISCPPSSDCRTAOPERATOR'S CONSOLERHRRCPFPPRZSGDTURCFLXBAFigure1-4.Functional LayoutDrawingofDonaldC.CookUnit2ControlRoomPanels67558:1/062883 1-15 FLXRCOTUSGFPCPSABAPRZRCPRHRSISSPYCCWESWFluxPanelRodControlPanelOe)taTandUnitPanelSteamGenerator PanelFeedPumpPanelCondensate Polishing PanelCondensate PanelTurbinePanelStationAuxiliary PanelGenerator PanelBoricAcidPanelPressurizer PanelReactorCoolantPumpPanelResidualHeatRemovalPanelSafety'injection SystemPanelContaiqment SprayPanelComponent CoolingWaterPanelEssential ServiceWaterPanelNESW-Nonessential ServiceWaterPanelIVVSEFSVNISFIRMSFFCMFXAPMSFIDRMSCWIsolation ValvesPanelVents.latlon PanelEmergency FirePanelPlantServicePanelNuclearInstrumentation CabinetsFixedIn-CorePanelRadiation Monitoring SystemPanelFailedFuelCommunications PanelMovableIn-coreCabinetAxialPowerDistribution Monitoring SystemCabinetFixedIn-coreCabinetRadiation Monitoring SystemCabinetCirculating WaterPanelFigureI"5.ListofAbbreviations andFunctionforControlPanels6755B:I/062883 1-17 ugQIz0ZUJa2cgCg5zUgCLCL+CaCaCCCa>OOOOCCCa0Z.CLug00.Coa:20II2ug0CLChz0IOOCC2agag'D22Ezcn00IOOIUOILZ~gI-0UgI2ulcnlu0OQZJugugzE~a~CCnugulooluUlCnDluggIL~~cn0ca220ID0ICn208t'TIILI<Icaa.(-5O)Qm]I>UgIch>)L(Jo+0OoUg0Zca>ZcaOzOzOZILcaOg00caI-Zl-gl-oIOlu0g2oguoZ~X..-~cucnug~IUlu~gcnZZ<)I-I-Oolu0CCZUJCL~ugca~o<ca<zox wc@InviaUJ20ID0CnID200zoO2gzI20II2I0I0cn<2IL00hl-CLEOCZDC)20IO2E0OOcaIO2zCJ022020CCD2IZIuOIu324gz82g02CCoo0ggOI-iogvzCCgIlgg0IUgluluI~>2cav0UgNOgcn2ca-QWQI5ICCcn20-2IUOIUE~C0CJCaIQZQ0cC4caaug0.0.caQPgOzCaOOZCCCCg'2Oa.UgY)calu0OQ2luOQlZIU0,coQOzl-22Ug~UugILca300caIZCLIL2CaIOOCUCaIVIUQ2+2CLugcaca~a<2~O.ZUJ<OgzaCCUl)CUE~lugaoca00.ZVYcaIXIU0ZcaZQgOcaI00>CCu.CJCaKx<CLUliIca)~COIQ~0~2luz~caa:COOI-zca2+~ZCC00.5caI-UJQlucfO0I->ILa:~CC0zoIuI-0QcgtcocaQ0gI>2cacnIL0UICJUJIgZYVIu00Iu0gaZZILUgO20IIUO0I~ILIUCL02CC22Ul2CCIOQugDozzu.0.I~R0oOu.2CCII-UgOoCLUJ~IUl(yO2ooIL-CacnZCaPuQO-coVzUgILCCN0CU>cnUga2cazX~QCnol<~u00Ugcap<00.ILozcn0CCIZOQZ<u.2IU~IUugIuzozozUgILZQZo8~~Iul~QcaZCn02ozozol=$zcagEa:CCPy400caca0II220UgVQUJIUI<0IP2ECaCaCCCao020ca02a.OKRaIZCClgJOg00.Icag000luO~CQ2caIL2I0D2cnCC0.Co2CCI-zo0.UgQCnZ0I0IUILIUIUIZ:zzQOo~~ugIU1CLIIzIII20I~CzI-o2-luI0.0.FgoOPRCAPERTURECAROI0oIL2DZOQ200a.~,0g~gaableOILApertureCard$-0$-0ncclcoI1-198401040196W~2 04t~(f~U, SECTION2MANAGEMENT ANDSTAFFING2-1.PURPOSEThepurposeofthissectionistoidentifytheOCRORProgramteamsandtheirareasofresponsibility. | |||
Figure2-1detailstheorganizational structure ofpersonnel involvedintheOCRORProgram.(}ualifications ofkeypersonnel areprovidedinappendixB.Allpersonnel ontheDonaldC.CookOCRDRProgramteamswillmeetorexceedthequalifications providedinNUREG0801andrelatedguidance. | |||
2-2.DCRDRTEAMINTERFACE Toeffectively performtheDCRORProgramandstillbeabletobesuccessfully audited,aninterface betweenthevariousreviewteamsisrequired. | |||
The"OCRDRProgramLeadEngineer" willbetheprimarycontactandliasionforthemanagement organization, designreview,projectreview,andassessment teams.Figures2-2through2-6showthesevariousinterfaces. | |||
2-3.MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONThemanagement functionfortheOCRDRProgramwillbeprovidedunderpreviously established AEPSCprocedural requirements andresponsibilities definedinAEPSCGeneralProcedure 25,"Engineering DesignChanges," | |||
andGeneralProcedure 32,"Preparation ofSubmittals totheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission." | |||
Thefunctionofmanagement isto:~Approvethe'Program PlanReport~Reviewandapproverecommendatons forcontrolroomdesignchangesI6755B:I/062883 2-1 | |||
~Providetheresources necessary forimplementation oftheDCROR~ApprovetheProgramSummaryReport~Providethemechanism forthepreparation andsubmittal ofdocuments totheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission., | |||
2-4.PROJECTREVIEWTEAMTheProjectReviewTeamwillcoordinate theDCRORProgram.Typicalteamfunctions areto:~ApproveTaskPlanspriortoperformance ofassociated ReviewTaskA~EnsurethattheDCRDRProgramisperformed inaccordance withtheAEPSCgualityAssurance Program~ProvideoverallsupporttotheDCRORprocess~MonitortheDCRORprogressoEnsurethatthedesignreviewobjectives andtasks,inrelationtootherNUREG0660efforts,areproperlycoordinated | |||
~Establish andinitiateacontrolroomimprovement programKeypersonnel fortheProjectReviewTeamareidentified infigure2-1.2-5.DESIGNREVIEWTEAMTheDesignReviewTeamcomprises thequalified multidiscipline personnel toperformthevariousreviewfunctions. | |||
Theareasofexpertise include:~NSSSandbalance-of-plant systems~Instrumentation andcontrol6755B:1/062883r2-2 | |||
~Conrolboarddesign~Humanfactors~Plantoperations (licensed operators) | |||
~Training~Licensing/nuclear safetyThefunctionoftheDesignReviewTeamistocarryouttheentiredesignreviewprograminaccordance withtheguidelines detailedinthisProgramPlanReport.DesignReviewTeamresponsibilities includethefollowing: | |||
~DeveloptheProgramPlanReport~DeveloptheLicenseeEventReportReviewReport~DeveloptheControlRoomInventory | |||
~Developforms/checklists | |||
~DevelopTaskPlansoDevelopControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReportoPerformReviewTasks~DevelopTaskSummaryReports~AssistAssessment Teamastechnical support~,DevelopImplementation Plans~DeveloptheProgramSummaryReport6755B:I/062883 2-3 Keypersonnel fortheDesignReviewTeamareidentified infigure2-1.2-6.ASSESSMENT TEAMTheAssessment Teamwill:~Evaluatethesignificance oftheobserveddepartures fromtheCRHECReportidentified inthePhaseIIreview~Identifytheapplicable departures ashumanengineering discrepancies (HED)~AssignacategoryandprioritytotheHEDsforscheduling ofcorrective action~Review/approve controlroomrecommendations forHEDcorrective actionpriortoorigination ofarequestforchange(AEPSCprocedure 25).Keypersonnel fortheAssessment Teamareidentified infigure2-1.6755B:I/0628832-4 P10J1CZREVIZÃTEAM*DCBDRProgramMninistrator: | |||
A.S.Grims*DCRDRProgramLeadEngineer: | |||
R.F.Shoemaker | |||
*DCRDRProgramPlantCoordinator: | |||
T.R.Stephens*DCRDRProgramProjectEngineer: | |||
F.VanPelt,Jr.*DCRDRProgramManager(Westinghouse): | |||
J.D.Young*~SCHumanFactorsConsultant: | |||
Dr.T.SheridanDESIGNREVI1%TEAM*DCRDRProgramAdministrator: | |||
A.S.Grieves*DCBDRProgramLeadEngineer/AEPSC I&CEngineer: | |||
R.F.Shor*AEPSCNuclearSafety&Licensing Engineer: | |||
K.J.Toth*I&MEG3ReactorOperators | |||
*DCRDRProgramPlantCoordinator: | |||
T.R.Stephens*AEPSCQualityAssurance Engineer: | |||
J.B.Brittan~*DCRDRProgramProjectEngineer: | |||
F.VanPelt,Jr.*AEPSCElectrical Engineer: | |||
L.P.~co*DCRDRProgramManager(Westinghouse): | |||
J.D.Young*DCRDRHumanFactorsConsultant (CanyonResearch): | |||
Dr.G.A.Elliff*I&MECO&Westinghouse TrainingPersonnel | |||
*Westinghouse TrainingPersonnel: | |||
R.J.Wartenberg ASSESSMENT TEAM*DCRDRProgramAdnunistrator: | |||
A.S.Grimes*DCRDRProgramLeadEngineer: | |||
R.F.Shor*AEPSCI&CSectionManager:J.C.Jeffrey*AEPSCNuclearSafetyandLicensing SectionManager:J.G.Feinstein | |||
*D.C.CookPlantManagemnt:B.A.Svensson*AEPSCHumanFactorsConsultant: | |||
Dr.T.Sheridan*I&MECOSeniorReactorOperator(s) | |||
*ArPSCManagerofQualityAssurance: | |||
R.F.Kroeger*AEPSCElectrical Generation SectionManager:R.C.CarruthFigure2-1.DCRDRProgramOrganization Structure 6755B:1/062883 2-5 | |||
DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~PREPAREPROGRAMPLANREPORTPROJECTREVIEWTEAMI~ | DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~PREPAREPROGRAMPLANREPORTPROJECTREVIEWTEAMI~APPROVEPROGRAMPLANREPORTPROGRAMPLANREPORTACCEPTABLE SUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENTS YESAEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.32"PREPARATION OFSUBMITTALS TONRC"MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION | ||
~Listsofacronymsandabbreviations~ | ~SUBMITPROGRAMPLANREPORTTONRCPROGRAMPLANREPORTNRC6755B:I/070583 Figure2-2.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseI,Planning2-7 DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~DEVELOPTASKPLAN~DEVELOPCONTROLROOMINVENTORY | ||
~Controlroominventory~Controlroomhumanfactorsurveys~Taskplans,checklists, | ~PERFORMREVIEW~DEVELOPLERREVIEWREPORT~~DEVELOPTASKSUMMARYREPORT~DEVELOPFORMS/CHECKLISTS | ||
]~>CQ7 19831984MAYJUNEJULYAUGSEPTOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNEJULYAUGSEPTOCTNOVDECJUNE27PLANNINGPHASEI~PLANNINGPPRToNRCPPRToNRCJAN1PHASEII- | ~DEVELOPCRHECREPORTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT PROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/APPROVE/COMMENT | ||
~ | -TASKSUMMARYREPORT-FORMS/CHECKLISTS NOTASKSUMMARYREPORTACCEPTANCE YESINPUTTOPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTSEEFIGURE2406755B:I/070583eFigure2-3.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseII,Review2-9 ASSESSMENT TEAM~DETERMINE SIGNIFICANCE OFHEDS~REVIEW/APPROVECONTROLROOMENHANCEMENTS/ | ||
~ | RETROFITS DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~ASSISTINHEDEVALUATION | ||
~DEVELOPFINALCRHECDOCUMENTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT PROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/COMMENT/APPROVE | |||
-FINALCRHECDOCUMENT-ASSESSMENT REPORTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT NOASSESSMENT REPORTACCEPTANCE YESINPUTTOPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTSEEFIGURE2.60Figure2-4.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseIII-A,Assessment 6755B:I/070583 2-11 SUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT NOCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTACCEPTABLE YESASSESSMENT TEAM~DEVELOPCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORT~DEVELOPIMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULEDESIGNREVIEWTEAM~ASSISTINDEVELOPMENT OFCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORT~ASSESSCONTROLROOMIMPROVEMENTSFORDEPARTURES FROMTHECRHECDOCUMENTPROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/COMMENT APPROVECONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORTAEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.25"ENGINEERING DESIGNCHANGE"MANAGEMENT FUNCTION~REVIEW/APPROVE CONTROLROOMENHANCEMENTS/ | |||
MODIFICATIONS SEEFIGURE24CFigure2-5.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseIII-B,Implementation 6755B:I/070583 2-13 DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~DEVELOPPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT PROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/COMMENT/ | |||
APPROVEPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTACCEPTABLE YESNOASSESSMENT REPORTSFROMFIGURE24BTASKSUMMARYREPORTSFROMFIGURE2.3APROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTMANAGEMENT FUNCTION~APPROVEPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORT~SUBMITPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTTONRCCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORTFROMFIGURE2-5CAEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.32"PREPARATION OFSUBMITTALS TONRC"PROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTNRCFigure2-6.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseIV,Reporting 6755B:I/070583 2-15 SECTION3DOCUMENTATION ANDDOCUMENTCONTROL3-1.INTRODUCTION Acompleteandup-to-date libraryofreference information isnecessary tomanageandperformthevariousphasesoftheDCRDRProgram.Thislibrarywillprovidesupportduringthedesignreviewaswellasadatabaseforfuturecontrolroommodifications. | |||
3"2.REFERENCE DOCUMENTATION Thefollowing documentation willbeusedduringthereviewphase:~.Controlroomdrawings(panellayouts,floorplan,andthelike)~Controlboardequipment specifications | |||
~Controlpanelphotographs (photomosaic) | |||
~Controlroompreliminary assessments | |||
~Description ofcodingconventions | |||
~OriginalandUpdatedFSARforD.C.CookUnits1and2~Instrumentation andcontroldiagrams~Operatortrainingmaterial~Systemsfunctiontaskanalysis6755B:1/0628833-1 | |||
~Listsofacronymsandabbreviations | |||
~Pipingandinstrumentation drawings~Plantcomputersoftwaredescription andsampleprintout~Procedures (emergency, normal,andthelike)~Systemdescriptions | |||
~Regulatory guidesandNUREGs(paragraph 1-6)~Controlroominventory list~AEPSCqualityassurance procedure | |||
~LicenseeeventreportsAnyadditional reference materialidentified bythedesignreviewteamduringthereviewphase(PhaseII)willbeobtainedandaddedtothelibrary.BecauseO.C.CookUnits1and2areoperating, accesstothecontrolroomswillbelimited.Therefore, photomosaics willbeusedtaperformmostofthetasksoutlinedinsection5.3-3.OCROR-GENERATEO DOCUMENTATION Thedocumentation generated bythedesignreviewprocesswillbesubjecttothosecontrolsidentified inparagraph 3-4.Thefollowing documentation willbeproducedbytheOCRORprocess:oProgramPlanReport(thisdocument) | |||
~Controlroomoperating personnel surveys6755B:I/062883 3-2 | |||
~Controlroominventory | |||
~Controlroomhumanfactorsurveys~Taskplans,checklists, datacollection forms,sketches, photographs, andphotomosaics usedinthereviewand.assessment/recommendation phases~Controlroomhumanengineering criteriareport~Licenseeeventreport(LER)review~ProgramSummaryReport3-4.DOCUMENTCONTROLAcontrolled-access filewillbeestablished forallhardcopyDCRDRProgramoutputdocuments. | |||
Inaddition, thesedocuments willbeenteredintoacomputer-based datasystem.Accesstothesefileswillbecontrolled bytheDCRDRprogrammanager.67558:1/062883 3-3 P.Ill SECTION4DESCRIPTION OFPHASEI,PLANNING4-I.INTRODUCTION Theplanningphaseconsistsofdeveloping awell-defined workprogramwhichoutlinesspecificrecommendations forpersonnel, reference | |||
: material, anddocumentation neededtoperformtheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgram(figure4-1).IEMECointendstocommencewiththeDCRDRProgramasdocumented inthisProgramPlanReportpriortoformalacceptance bytheNRC.Anydeficiencies notedinthisProgramPlanReportshouldbebroughttotheattention ofaI&MECoinatimelymanner.Finalacceptance ofthisdocumentwillendthePlanningPhase.4-2.DCRDRMILESTONES AscheduleforPhasesIandIIofthisProgramPlanwasdeveloped andisincludedasfigure4-2.AsstatedintheI8MECoresponsetoG.L.82-33(AEP:NRC:0773) onApril15,1983,anintermediate milestone responsewillbesumittedtotheNRCwiththecurrentstatusoftheDCRDRProgramonSeptember 1,1984.Atthattime,PhasesIandIIwillbeessentially completed, andanestimateforthePhaseIII-AAssessment willbedeveloped shortlythereafter. | |||
TheNRCwillbeprovidedwithmoredetailedinformation regarding PhaseIII-AAssessment schedule(inanotherintermediate milestone response) whenthisestimatehasbeenmadeandtheevaluation ofitiscompleted. | |||
4-3.CONTROLROOMHUMANENGINERING CRITERIAREPORTwAtthebeginning ofthereviewphase,apreliminary ControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReportwillbedeveloped. | |||
Thispreliminary criteriareportwillcontain,asabaseline, detailedTaskPlanswhichwillbeexecutedtocompletespecificPhaseIIReviewTaskswithintheDCRDRProgram.TheTask6755B:I/0628834-1 Planshavebeenproveneffective onover20humanfactorscontrolroomreviews.TheTaskPlanswillprovideadetailedaudittrailtothegenericguidelines providedinNUREG0700,yethavebeenrestructured tofacilitate thedatacollection, documentation, andauditingrequirements inherentinaNUREG0700orientedDCRDRProgram.Basedonobservations andassessments oftheDCRDRProgram,thegenericguidelines ofNUREG0700foundinthepreliminary CRHECReportwillberevisedtoreflectplant-specific designconventions andplant-specific humanfactorscriteria. | |||
AsectionofthefinalCRHECReportwillbededicated todepartures fromNUREG0700withtheapplicable justification providedtherein.ThefinalCRHECReportisintendedtoensurethatanyfuturecontrolboardmodifications reflectpreviously evaluated humanfactorspractices anddonotdetractfromoperability ofthecontrolboard.6755B:1/0628834-2 REVIEWOVERALLDCRDRPROGRAMOBJECTIVES EVALUATEOBJECTIVES | |||
&DESIGNGUIDELINES TOBEUSEDIDENTIFYRESOURCES REQUIREDOUTLINEALLREVIEWTASKSTOBEPERFORMED ASPARTOFTHEDCRDRPROGRAMDEVELOPTHEDCRDRPROGRAMSCHEDULEISSUEPROGRAMPLANREPORT~ASSESSACTIVITIESCOMPLETED BYAEPSCANDl&MECo~EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES | |||
,~DESIGNCRITERIAINCLUDING PLANTSPECIFICITEMS~NUREG066007000801~DEFINEPROGRAMSTHATHAVEANIMPACTONCONTROLROOMDESIGN(NUREG0696,REGULATORY GUIDE1.97)~DEFINERELATIONSHIP WITHOTHEREMERGENCY RESPONSEACTIVITY~PRELIMINARY CRHECREPORT~FINALSAFETYANALYSISREPORT~SYSTEMDESCRIPTIONS | |||
~PIPINGANDINSTRUMENTATION DRAWINGS~FLOORPLANS~PANELLAYOUTS~ABBREVIATIONS ANDCODING'SOFTWAREDESCRIPTIONS | |||
~PROCEDURES | |||
~OPERATORTRAININGANDEXPERIENCE | |||
~TASK1-OPERATING EXPFRIENCE REVIEW~TASK2'-SYSTEMFUNCTIONS REVIEWANDTASKANALYSIS~TASK3-CONTROLROOMINVENTORY | |||
~TASK4-CONTROLROOMHUMANFACTORSURVEY~TASK5-VERIFICATION OFTASKPERFORMANCE | |||
~TASK6-VALIDATION OFCONTROLROOMFUNCTIONS | |||
~AEPSCANDl&MECoINPUTSTOSCHEDULE~REVIEWPROCESS~METHODOLOGY | |||
~TEAMQUALIFICATIONS | |||
~DESIGNGUIDELINES | |||
~SCHEDULE~INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS OFPARTICIPANTS | |||
~DOCUMENTATION ANDDOCUMENTCONTROLPRC.;APERTURE CAROFigure4-1.PlanningPhaseDevelopment OutlineI4-38401040i96~Q | |||
]~>CQ7 19831984MAYJUNEJULYAUGSEPTOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNEJULYAUGSEPTOCTNOVDECJUNE27PLANNINGPHASEI~PLANNINGPPRToNRCPPRToNRCJAN1PHASEII-REVIEWTASK1LERREVIEWCROPSLERREVIEWSEPT1OCT1NOV1CROPSJAN2CROPSMAY22JUNE1TASK2SFRTATASK3CRITASK4CRHFSTASK5VERIFICATION TASK6VALIDATION PHASEIIIDETAILEDESTIMATION CRISEPT1OCTIMAR22JAN29MAR25iUNITNo.2)OUTAGECRHFSNOTE1JUNE30JULY14AUG15VERIF.SEPT1OCT6OCT20VALID.NOV1NOV22COMPLIESWITHSUPPLEMENT 1NUREG0737 PARAGRAPH 52.A"LICENSEES SHALLSUBMITPROGRAMPLANWITHINTWOMONTHSFROMSTARTOFDCRDR."~AEPSCANDINDIANAANDMICHIGANACTIVITY~~DCRDRREVIEWTEAMACTIVITYNOTE1CRHFSACTIVITIES MAYOCCURINPARALLELWITHCROPS.CRHFSSUMMARYREPORTDUEJUNE30,1984.Figure4-2.DCRDRProgramScheduleforPhasesIandII SECTION5DESCRIPTION OFPHASEII,REVIEW5-1.INTRODUCTION DuringtheReviewPhaseoftheD.C.CookDCRDRProgram,datawillbecollected andhumanfactorsissueswillbereviewed. | |||
Thus,theobjective oftheReviewPhaseisthecollection ofdataidentifying attributes oftheD.C.CookUnits1and2controlroomswhichdepartfromcriteriaspecified intheD.C.CookControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport(paragraph 4-3).TheReviewPhasewillgenerate: | |||
oTaskSummaryReportsforeachmajorreviewphasetaskspecifying methodsusedandfindings~Component sheetsspecifying thefindingsofeachtaskrelatedtoeachcomponent inthecontrolroom~Checklist observation formsdocumenting departures fromthehumanengineering criteriaestablished beforeandduringthereviewphase5-2.REVIEWPHASESTAFFINGTheReviewPhasewillbeconducted bytheDesignReviewTeam.Representatives ofI&MECo,AEPSC,Westinghouse, andCanyonResearchGroupwillbeincludedontheteam.Appropriate disciplines fromtheseorganizations willbeincludedoneachtaskteam.DesignReviewTeammembersinclude:~Systemdesigners andanalysts~Humanfactorsconsultants | |||
~Controlboarddesigners 6755B:1/0628835-1 | |||
~Instrumentation andcontrolengineers | |||
~Plantoperators | |||
~Licensing engineers | |||
~Datamanagement technicians | |||
~Electrical engineers | |||
~gualityassurance engineers 5-3.METHODOLOGY FORREVIEWPHASETASKSThemethodology fortheReviewPhasetaskswillconsistofexecuting TaskPlansandcompleting humanengineering surveysasreflected intheD.C.CookControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport.5-4.Task1--0eratinExerienceReviewTheoperating experience reviewconsistsoftworelatedactivities. | |||
Thefirstisareviewofplantperformance recordsforD.C.CookUnits1and2(andareviewofLERsforothersimilarplants)toidentifyareasinwhichhumanerrorhascausedproblemsinthepastthatmayberelatedtocontrolpaneldesign.ThesecondactivityistheControlRoomOperating Personnel Survey(CROPS).TheDesignReviewTeamwillinterview arepresentative sampleconsisting ofatleast50percentofthelicensedcontrolroomoperators atD.C.CookUnits1and2.Theobjective oftheCROPSistoidentifyspecificattributes oftheD.C.CookUnits1and2.controlboarddesignwhich,intheoperators'pinions, havecausedorcouldpotentially causeoperatorerror.TheCROPSwillbeconducted byadmini'stration ofquestionnaires andbyconducting individual andgroupinterviews. | |||
6755B:1/0628835-2 5-5.Task2-SstemFunctionandTaskAnalsisTheSystemFunctionandTaskAnalysiswillestablish instrumentation requirements andperformance criteriaforselectnormalandemergency conditions. | |||
Thistaskwillbeperformed byusingplant-specific procedures generated fromtheWestinghouse Owners'roup Emergency ResponseGuidelines. | |||
Theseplant-specific procedures willbesubmitted totheDesignReviewTeam.ThisdatawillprovideinputtotheDesignReviewTeamfortheverification andvalidation ofcontrolroomfunctions (Tasks5and6).5-6.Task3-ControlRoomInventorThecontrolroominventory willbedeveloped onacomputerdatabaseandwillincludealldatarequiredbyNUREG0700foreachcomponent. | |||
AEPSCwi11developandmaintaintheD.C.CookControlRoomInventory database.Formatsandcompleteness ofthedataitemlisthavebeenreviewedbyallreviewteammembersandcommentshavebeenincorporated toensurethattheinventory databasetosupportrelevantD.C.CookDCRDRProgramtaskscanbeaccepted. | |||
5-7'.Task4-ControlRoomHumanFactorsSurveThebulkofthedetaileddataregarding specificdepartures fromtheControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReportwillbegatheredintheControlRoomSurveysTask.TheControlRoomSurveysTaskwillbeconducted bycompleting 14humanengineering surveysasfollows:~Workspace eAnthropometrics | |||
~Emergency equipment | |||
~Heating,ventilating, andairconditioning | |||
~Illumination 6755B:I/062883 5-3 | |||
~AmbientnoiseoMaintainabi 1ity~Communications | |||
~Annunciator | |||
~Controls~Displays~Labelsandlocationaids~Computersystemreview~Conventions DetailedTaskPlans,checklists, specialdatacollection forms,NUREG0700criteriareferences applicable toD.C.Cook,andmethodology descriptions foreachsurveywillbeincludedintheCRHECReport.TheAnnunciator SurveyTaskPlanisincludedinthisProgramPlanReportinappendixCasanexample.5-8.WorksaceSurve--Thissurveyconcentrates onthegenerallayoutandarrangement ofcontrolroomequipment. | |||
Theworkspace surveywillalsoaddresstheadequacyofcontrolroomnoninstrumentation itemssuchasdesksandchairs.5-9.AnthroometricSurve--Theanthropometric surveywillassessanddocumentthevisionandreachenvelopes forallD.C.Cookcontrolroomequipment. | |||
Thisdatawillbeevaluated forgeneralcontrolanddisplaylocationadequacybasedupontheCRHECReportanthropometric criteriaforthe5thpercentile femaleand95thpercentile male.Inaddition, theanthropo-metricdatawillbeusedtosupporttheverification andvalidation tasks.6755B:I/0628835-4 5-10.EmerencEuimentSurve-Emergency equipment willbeevaluated forusability bythecontrolroomoperators. | |||
Includedwillbeanassessment ofemergency equipment storagelocations; operatoraccessability; tactile,visual,andauditoryadequacyofbreathing apparatus andprotective clothing; andothercriticalfeaturesofthecontrolroomemergency equipment. | |||
5-11.HeatinVentilatinandAirConditionin Surve""Theailflow,temperature regulation, andhumiditycontrolwithinthecontrolroomwillbeevaluated intermsoftheCRHECReport.Theprimaryconcernistoidentifyparameters whichmaybeoutoftolerance orunstabletothepointofadv'ersely | |||
,affecting therecommended comfortzonesforthecontrolroom.5-12.Illumination Surve-Ambientillumination willbemeasuredusingappropriate instruments forlightinglevelsatvariousworkstations andcontrolboardareas.Presenceofglare,ifany,oninstrumentation willbedocumented. | |||
Illumination willbeevaluated forcompliance withrecommended andrequiredlightlevelsforidentified tasks.5-13.AmbientNoiseSurve--Ambientnoisewillbemeasur'ed usingappropriate soundmeasurement equipment. | |||
Aprimaryconcernwillbethepeakandaveragedecibel(A) levelsandthepreferred octavebanddecibellevelsfortheambientnoiseconditions. | |||
Thedatawillbereviewedforpotential soundproblemswhichmayinterfere withoperatorcommunication requirements orwhichmaymaskauditorysignals.5-14.Maintainabilit Surve--Themaintainability surveywillassesshumanfactorssuitability ofallequipment inthecontrolroom.Primaryconcernsarethattheoperators canmaintainindicator lights,determining ifannuncia" torsystembulbsarereplaceable, replenishing expendables suchasrecorderpaperandink,anddetermining thatsparepartsandexpendables areavailable andaccessable. | |||
V5-15.Communications Surve--Thecontrolroomcommunication systemswillbereviewedandevaluated todetermine iftheyareadequatetosupportemergency andnormaloperations. | |||
Systemssuchasthepagingsystem,intercom6755B:1/062883 5-5 system,-telephone system,sound-powered andportableradiocommunications equipment, andfree/air, unaidedvoicecommunications willbeincludedinthisreview.Auditorysignalswillalsobeevaluated forapplications, meaning,codingtechniques, signaltransmission/propagation, andsignalcharacteristics. | |||
5-16.Annunciator SstemsReview--Theannunciator system,asaspecialcaseoflegendlightdisplaysandauditorysignals,willbeevaluated intermsofitsgeneralhumanengineering suitability andalsoasacriticalandcentralcontrolroomsystemusedintheidentification oftransient andemergency conditions. | |||
Datacollected willbeanalyzedfordiscrepant characteristics whichmaypotentially increasetheprobability ofhumanerror.Also,relevantdatawillbeusedtosupporttheverification andvalidation tasks.engineering suitability withoutreference tospecifictasksupportive roles.Theprimarycriteriawillbethatcontained intheCRHECReportbasedonsection6.4ofNUREG0700.fgeneralhumanengineering suitability independently ofthespecifictasksinwhichthedisplaysareused.Theprimarycriteriawillbethatcontained intheCRHECReportbasedonSection6.5ofNUREG0700.5-19.LabelsandLocationAids-Thecontrolpanelsandinstrumentation willbesurveyedforgeneralreadability andconsistency ofterms,abbrevia-tions,andacronyms. | |||
Datafromthistaskandtheconventions surveywillfurnishthebaselineinformation usedtoestablish astandarddictionary ofterms,abbreviations, andacronymsusedthroughout thecontrolroom.5-20.ComuterSstemReview--TheP-250processcomputersystemusedinthecontrolroomwillbeassessedforitsfunctional integration intotheoperational requirements ofthecontrolroom.Itwillalsobeevaluated forgeneralhumanfactorssuitability andforitssupportive roleincontrolroomoperation. | |||
Thecritiera. | |||
fromtheCRHECReport,basedonNUREG0700,Section6.7(processcomputers), | |||
formsthebasisforthis=taskplan.6755B:I/062883 5-6 5-21.Conventions Surve-Thepurposeoftheconventions surveyisthreefold. | |||
Thoseconventions usedatD.C.Cook,whethergeneralstereotypes, industryconventions, orplant-specific conventions, willbeidentified. | |||
Second,theidentified conventions willbeevaluated forgoodhumanfactorscharacteristics, asdefinedinthecriteriafromtheCRHECReportbasedonsection6ofNUREG0700.Finally,anyinconsistencies intheapplications ofidentified conventions willbedocumented andtheirimpactassessed. | |||
Datafromthistaskandthelabelingandlocationaidstaskwillbeusedtodevelopranddocumentastandarddictionary ofterms,abbreviations, andacronymsfortheD.C.Cookplants.5-22.Task5-Verification ofControlRoomFunctionAsoneofthetwoterminaltasksinthereviewphase,thepresenceandsuitability ofcontrolroominstrumentation willbeverified. | |||
Theprimaryconcernwillbedetermining thatallrequiredinformation andcontrolcapabilities areinthecontrolroom.Asacorollary, thepresenceofnonessential information andcontrolinstrumentation willbeassessedtoensurethatitdoesnotdetractfromadequateoperatorperformance. | |||
DatafromtheControlRoomInventory andthesystemsfunctionandtaskanalysisareextensively usedintheseactivities. | |||
5-23.Task6--Validation ofControl.RoomFunctions Throughaprocessofwalkthroughs andtalkthroughs selectedemergency andnormaloperations willbevalidated fortheavailability ofrequiredskillsandknowledge ofthetrainedoperators. | |||
5-24.PRODUCTSOFTHEREVIEWPHASETheprimaryoutputoftheReviewPhaseisasetofchecklist observation (CLO)forms.Eachdeparture fromestablished humanfactorscriteriaobservedduringtheReviewPhasewillbedocumented | |||
~EachCLOformwillstatetheproblem,affectedcomponents, criteriaviolated, probableerror,andotherrelevantdatarequiredforanalysisoftheproblem.67558:I/062883 5-7 TheCLOswi11providetheprimaryinputtotheAssessment Phase,whereeachwillbecategorized according tosafetyand/oroperational impact.Inaddi-tion,atthecompletion oftheReviewPhase,component sheetfileswi11becomplete, andTaskSummaryReportsforeachtaskwillhavebeenprepared. | |||
6755B:1/062883 5-8 SECTION6DESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-A,ASSESSMENT 6-1.INTRODUCTION Thereviewprocessdescribed insection5willresultintheidentification ofdepartures fromhumanengineering criteriadefinedintheCRHECReport.Analysisandinterpretation ofthesedepartures willberequiredtoestablish theirpotential safetyimplications. | |||
Meansofcorrecting orminimizing theeffectsofthedepartures willbeidentified anddocumented. | |||
Aplanofactionwillbeappliedtoimprovements affecting operatorperformance underemergency andselectednormaloperating conditions. | |||
ThePhaseIIIactivities ofassessment andimplementation arecoveredinthissectionandsection7,following. | |||
TheAssessment PhaseoftheDCRDRProgramwi11achievethefollowing objectives: | |||
~Analyzeandevaluatetheobserveddepartures fromhumanengineering criteriaidentified duringthereviewphase~Recommend themeansofcorrecting thosedepartures whichcouldaffectsafetyorplant/operator performance- | |||
~Defineaplanofactionwhichappliesthehumanfactorprinciples toimprovecontrolroomdesignandtoenhanceoperatoreffectiveness andefficiency | |||
~Applytheassessment processtootherprojectsrelatedtothecontrolroomwhichareconcerned with,ormaybeaffectedby,thehumanfactorsreview(Regulatory Guide1.97,Revision2,safetyparameters displaysystem,procedures, training) 6755B:I/0628836-1 6-2.METHODOLOGY Theassessment processinvolvesthereviewandevaluation ofallCRHECReportdepartures identified bytheDesignReviewTeamduringPhaseIItodetermine whichdepartures canaffecttheoperator's performance suchthatthepotential foroperatorerorisincreased. | |||
Thisprocessalsoinvolvesdetermining theextentofcorrections andjustifying anyrecommendations whichdonotcompletely correctthediscrepancies. | |||
Alldepartures fromtheCRHECReportidentified duringtheReviewPhasewillbeprocessed according totheassessment methodology presented infigure6-1.Thesedepartures willbedocumented onchecklist observation formsandwillbeprovidedtotheAssessment Teamforanalysisandassessment. | |||
Also,someoftheoperating personnel willbecanvassed usingthephotomosaic toresolveanyfactorswhichcouldcontribute toperformance problems. | |||
TheAssessment TeamwillreviewtheCLOstodetermine theneedforreassess-mentbytheDesignReviewTeamortheiracceptance asHEDs.Thedisposition ofeachCLOwillbejustified and/ordocumented bytheAssessment Team.TheAssessment Teamwillevaluateandcategorize eachHEDaccording tothemetho-dologypresented infigure6-2.Thisapproachaccomplishes theassessment objectives ofNUREGs0700and0801.AllcategoryI,II,andIIIHEDswillbeanalyzedforcorrection asperfigure6-3.CategoryIVHEDs,considered optionalforcorrection, willbeassessedfortheircumulative andinteractive effectsonallotherHEDs.Thosecate-goryIVHEDsshowntopossesstheaboveeffectswillberecategorized totheappropriate categoryIIlevel.'ITheinitialstepinthisprocessistoidentifythoseHEDswhichcanbecor-rectedbyenhancements, trainingofoperators, and/orprocedural revisions. | |||
Theremaining HEDswillbeanalyzedtoidentifyandprovidedesignimprovement alternatives. | |||
Acost/benefit analysiswillbeperformed todetermine whichcorrections arethemostfeasibleandacceptable fromahumanengineering pointofview.Asapartofthereview,IEMECo/AEPSC willperformacost/benefitassessment forimplementation oftherecommendations. | |||
6755B:1/0628836-2 Thecontrolroomreviewprocesswillbereapplied asappropriate toensurethefollowing: | |||
~ThatthecreationofnewHEDsisidentified | |||
~Thatothercorrections arenotinvalidated | |||
~Compliance withhumanengineering guidelines developed duringPhaseIITheHEDsandfinalrecommendations forcorrection providedbytheassessment teamwillbesubmitted totheProjectReviewTeamforreviewanddisposition. | |||
RejectedCLOsand/orrecommendations willbereturnedtotheAssessment Teamforadditional assessment. | |||
6755B:I/062883 6-3 INTERFACE/ | |||
REASSESSDESIGNREVIEWTEAM~PERFORMSTHEREVIEW~PREPARESCHECKLIST OBSERVATION FORMS-LISTOFDEPARTURES FROMPRELIMINARY CONTROLROOMHUMANENGINEERINGCRITERIAREPORTCLOASSESSMENT TEAM~REVIEWCLOS~DETERMINE SIGNIFICANCE/ | |||
IMPACTASHUMANENGINEERING DISCREPANCIES (HEDS)~INTERFACE WITHDESIGNREVIEWTEAM~CATEGORIZE HEDS(REFERTOFIGURE6-3)~FINALRECOMMENDATIONS | |||
~DEVELOPIMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULEHEDS(W/FINALRECOMMENDATIONS) | |||
PROJECTREVIEWTEAMREASSESS/DISAPPROVE~REVIEW/COMMENT HEDSWITHFIMALRECOMMENDATIONS~INTERFACE WITHASSESSMENT TEAM~AEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.25"ENGINEERING DESIGNCHANGES"Figure6-1.Assessment Methodology Chart6755B:1/0628836-5 DESIGNREVIEWTEAMCHECKLIST OBSERVATIONS FORMS(REASSESSMENT) | |||
ASSESSMENT TEAMHUMANENGINEERING DISCREPANCIESEVALUATEFORSAFETYCONSEQUENCE YESNOYESHIGHPROBABILITY OFOPERATIONAL ERROR/SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION ASSESSFORSIGNIFICANTOPERATIONAL IMPACTSNONOYESCATEGORY2REFERTOFIGURE6-3CATEGORY3REFERTOFIGURE6-3NOSIGNIFICANTCOSTVERSUSOPERATORBENEFITCATEGORY1REFERTOFIGURE6-3IDENTIFYCORRECTIONSANDCOSTSTOFIXYESSELECTRECOMMENDED BACKFITQQc0oz5PeItASSESSFORNEWDEPARTURES FROMPRELIMINARY CRHECREPORTDOCUMENTANDPREPAREFORIMPLEMENTATION CATEGORY4DOCUMENTREFERTOFIGURE6-3Figuzq6-2.HumanEngineering Discrepancy Evaluation FlowChart 1I4-t'e+P)'.1 REVIEWPROCESSOBSERVATIONS HEDASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENT CRITERIACATEGORYIVASSESSMENT FACTORSAFETY(")CONSEQUENCES: | |||
DOCUMENTED ERRORSINCREASED POTENTIAL FORERRORLOWPROBABILITY OFERRORNOTASSOCIATED WITHPROBABILITYOFERRORIMPLEMENTATION (RATING)EARLIESTOPPORTUNITY (MANDATOR Y)EARLIESTOPPORTUNITY (HIGHPRIORITY) | |||
CONVENIENT OUTAGE(ACCEPTED) | |||
MAYORMAYNOTBEREQUIRED(NOTMANDATORY) | |||
HEDS(I,II,III) | |||
(")EXAMPLE:RESULTSINUNSAFEOPERATION, VIOLATION OFTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CATIVRECOMMENDED CORRECTIONS NODOCUMENTYESANALYSISFORCORRECTION Figure6-3.HEDCategoryGuidelines 6755B:1/0628836-9 | |||
SECTION7OESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-B,IMPLEMENTATION Approvedsolutions ofHEDsbytheProjectReviewTeamwillbescheduled forimplementation. | |||
Thecategoryguidelines established insection6willbeusedasabasisforthecorrective actionschedule. | |||
Additional considerations inthedevelopment oftheimplementation schedulewillbe:~Safetyconsequences ofoperatorerrorsthatcouldbecausedbythediscrepancy | |||
~Integration withotherpost-TMIprograms~Plantoperation constraints oOperatortraining/retraining requirements | |||
~Outageschedules oEquipment procurement schedules Thefollowing designations, identifed inNUREG0801,willbeadoptedforscheduling purposes: | |||
theNRC.Makechangesatthefirstrefueling aftersubmittal ofthereportorthefirstoutageafterreceiptofequipment (expedited). | |||
~Nearterm.CorrectproblemsonascheduleapprovedbytheNRC.Makechangesatthesecondrefueling outageaftersubmittal ofthereport.~Lontermotional.Corrections ofinsignificant discrepancies maybeimplemented atanytime.6755B:1/0628837-1 | |||
SECTION8. | SECTION8.OESCRIPTION OFPHASEIV,REPORTING AProgramSummaryReportwillbepreparedinaccordance withNUREGs0700and0801uponcompletion oftheOCRORProgram.Thisreportwilldocumenttheoverallreviewprocess,describeandidentifyallofthehumanengineering discrepancies andfindings, andsummarize allDCRORactivities, methodologies, andproposedcontrolroomimprovements. | ||
Thisreportwillalsoprovideanimplementation scheduleforplannedcorrective action.Thescheduleforplannedcorrective actionshallbebasedonrealistic andachievable dates.Theuseofintermediate milestones inplaceofenddatesmaybeusedifadditional relevantinformation isnotavailable atthetimetheProgramSummaryReportis.submitted totheNRC.Intermediate milestone dateswillbedetermined baseduponthedatebywhichnecessary additional information willbeknown,thuspermitting aninformeddetermination ofenddates.TheProgramSummaryReportwillupdatetheProgramPlanningReport.TheProgramSummaryReportwillbepreparedusingtherecommended formatshowninfigure8-1.Inadditiontothisfinalreport,supporting documentation willbeavailable forcompleteness intheeventofanNRCaudit.6755B:I/062883 8-1 II CONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWSUMMARYREPORT1.0METHODOLOGY 1.1DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramPlanObjectives 1.1.1DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewmethodology 1.1.2DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewprogrammanagement 1.1.3Proposedscheduleofthefourphasesofactivity(chart)1.1.4Integration ofotheremergency responseactivities ofNUREG0737,Supplement 11.1.5Qualityassurance program1.2Management andStaffing1.2.1Qualification ofDetailedContxolRoomDesignReviewpersonnel 1.2.2Organizational structure ofDCRDRReviewTeams1.3Documentation andDocumentControl.1.4ReviewPhase1.4.11.4.21.4.31.4.41.4.51.4.6Operating experience reviewSystemfunctions reviewandtaskanalysisControlroominventory ControlroomhumanfactorssurveyVerification oftaskperformance Validation ofcontrolroomfunctions 2.0REVIEWCONCERNS2.1ControlRoomHumanFactorSurveyConcerns2.1.1Workspace Survey2.1.2Anthropometrics Survey2.1.3Emergency Equipment Survey2.1.4Heating,Ventilation, andAirCondition Survey2.1.5Illumination Survey2.1.6AmbientNoiseSurvey-Figure8-1.SampleofProgramSummaryReportFormat(Sheet1)67558:1/062883 8-3 | |||
CONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWSUMMARYREPORT(cont)2.1.72.1.82.1.92.1.102.1.112.1. | CONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWSUMMARYREPORT(cont)2.1.72.1.82.1.92.1.102.1.112.1.12Maintainability SurveyCommunication SurveyAnnunciator SystemsReviewControlsSurveyDisplaysSurveyLabelsandLocationAids2.1.13ComputerSystemReview2.1.14Conventions Survey2.2Panel/Work StationConcerns2.3SystemConcerns2.4OtherReviewConcerns3.0ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATION ANDIMPLEMENTATION PHASE3.1HEDAssessment 3.2ProposedImplementation 3.3Scheduled Implementation | ||
==4.0CONCLUSION== | ==4.0CONCLUSION== | ||
Figure8-1.SampleofProgramSummaryReportFormat(Sheet2)6755B:1/062883 8-5 SECTION9COORDINATION WITHNUREG0737,SUPPLEMENT 1,ACTIYITIES Theactivities tobecoordinated withtheDCRDRinaccordance withNUREG0737,Supplement 1,includethefollowing requirements forEmergency ResponseCapabilities: | |||
SafetyParameter DisplaySystem(SPDS)UpgradeofEmergency Operating Prodecures (EOPs)Application toEmergency ResponseFacilities | |||
-Regulatory Guide1.97Emergency ResponseFacilities (ERFs)IEMECowilladdresstheseactivities asreferenced inI&MECo'sresponsetoNRCGenericLetter82-33forD.C.CookUnits1and2;letterPAEP-NRC-0773, datedApril15,1983.Ascheduleofperformance andintegration oftheseotherpostTMIactivities withtheDCRDRisshowninFigure9-1.6755B:1/062883 C)(TlER(X7D.C.COOKPLANT-DCRDRCOORDINATION SCHEDULE1983198'985JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND SPDSHARDWARESOFTWAREINSTALLED | |||
$7ATv5AVAILABLE RFm'~FORTRAININGOPERATIONAL WITHOPERATORTRAININGCOMPLETEDCRDRPPRTONRCINTERMEDIATE STATUSREPORTREVIEWPHASECOMPLETEFINALSUMMARYREPORTTONRCREG.GUIDE1.97EOPEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTS SPECIFIED | |||
,STATUSPFFAk'7INTERMEDIATE STATUSREPORTPRGCEAlRE (jEN.PACk:QQG/hl0pzmvoqncRCrg~wlN8COMPLETEREVIEWREV.2IMPLEMENTED KEYTARGETCOMMITMENT Figure9-1.ScheduleofPerformance SECTjON10QUALITYASSURANCE TheOCRORProgramwillbeperformed inaccordance withAEPSCQualityAssurance ProgramfortheOonaldC.CookNuclear'lant, specifically AEPSCGeneralProcedure 2.1andotherapplicable generalprocedures asreferenced hereinandtheapplicable portionsofWestinghouse WCAP-8370 pertaining todocumentcontrolandauditability. | |||
6755B:1/06288310-1 SECTION11SUMMARYThisProgramPlanReportdefinestheoverallprocessbywhichtheO.C.CookUnits1and2DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramwillbeperformed. | |||
Itisaneffective andthoroughdesignreviewwhichwillensurethattheresultsofthiseffortmeettheintentofallapplicable government regulations andguidelines. | |||
IndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyhascommitted theresources neededtoperformthedesignreviewasdetailedinthisdocument. | |||
Therefore, theacceptability oftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramwillbebasedontheapproval'f thisProgramPlanReport.TheIndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyCorporation reservestheright,however,tomakechangesandwillnotifytheNRCpriortotheexecution ofanyplanneddepartures. | |||
Finalacceptance ofthisdocumentwillendthePlanningPhaseofthisprogram.6755B:1/062883 APPENDIXALISTOFABBREVIATIONS Thefollowing abbreviations applyonlytothisProgramPlanReportanddonotnecessarily applytoeffortsassociated withplantstandardabbreviations. | |||
A/EAEPSCBOPCLOCRCRICROPSCRTDCRDRDRTEOPEPRIERGFSARHEHEDHFI8(CIKMECoINPOLELERMCBMWeMWtNRCNSSSOSDPCPMPPRArchitect/Engineer AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation BalanceofPlantChecklist Observation (form)ControlRoomControlRoomInventory ControlRoomOperating Personnel SurveyCathodeRayTubeDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewDesignReviewTeamEmergency Operating Procedures ElectricPowerResearchInstitute Emergency ResponseGuidelines FinalSafetyAnalysisReportHumanEngineering HumanEngineering Discrepancy HumanFactors-Instrumentation andControlIndianaandMichiganElectricPowerCompany(licensee) | |||
Institute ofNuclearPowerOperators LeadEngineerLicenseeEventReportMainControlBoardMegawatt(electric) | |||
Megawatt(thermal) | |||
NuclearRegulatory Commission NuclearSteamSupplySystemOperational Sequences DiagramsPlantCoordinator ProgramManagerPreliminary PlanningReport6755B:1/062883 PRT-ProjectReviewTeamPSR-ProgramSummaryReportPWR-Pressurized WaterReactorSFTA-SystemsFunctionandTaskAnalysisSPDS-SafetyParameter DisplaySystemTMI-ThreeMileIslandWOG-Westinghouse Owner'sGroupCRHEC-ControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaTP-TaskPlanCRG-CanyonResearchGroupCRHFS-ControlRoomHumanFactorsSurvey6755B:I/062883A-2 APPENDIXBRESUMESOFKEYPERSONNEL 6755B:1/112983 B-l | |||
RobertF.KroeerManagerofQualityAssurance Twentythreeyearsexperience inelectrical engineering, nuclearfuel,andqualityassurance involving majorpowergenerating anddistribution intheU.S.EDUCATION: | |||
B.S.Electrical Engineering PurdueUniversity | |||
-1960Additional Education: | |||
-IndianaUniversity | |||
-BusinessManagement 1960-62-GeneralElectricCo.PowerSystemsEngineering Course1967-1968 | |||
-AEPManagement Program-University ofMichigan-1980EXPERIENCE 1978'toPresentAmericanElectricPowerServiceCororation.ManaerofualitAssurance | |||
-Responsibilities include:formulating andrecommending policiesandpractices withrespecttotheQAandQCprogramsforCookPlant;establishing effective QAandQCprogramsfortheCookPlant;insuringeffective implementation oftheestablished QAandQCprograms; providing guidanceandassistance toAEPSCandCookPlantmanagement onQAandQCrequirements andthenimplementation; monitoring ofcompliance withestablished QAprogramsthroughaudits,surveillance andreviews;andreporting toSeniormanagement andQAprogramseffectiveness. | |||
Directtheday-to-day operation oftheAEPSCQADepartment including recommending thehiring,salaryadjustments, promotions, transfers, disciplining, andtermination ofpersonnel. | |||
ContinueasSecretary oftheCCB.ElectedamemberoftheAEPSCNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee (Offsitereviewcommittee forCookPlant).1976to1978StaffEnineer,NuclearEnineerinDivision-Responsibilities includedpaiticipation innuclearfueldesignreviews,vendorevaluation, andinprocess surveillance andauditsofnuclearfuelfabrication. | |||
Continued asSecretary oftheCCB.1973to1976StaffEnineer,ProjectManagement Division-Responsibilities includeddevelopment oftransmission anddistribution projectmanagement systemsandtechniques, methodsofmanpowerallocations, andmethodsforcostcontrol.Wasassignedtheresponsibility asSecretary oftheAEPSCChangeControlBoard(CCB)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.'Wasassignedtoa2persontaskactiongrouptodevelopcorporate projectmanagement andcontrolprocedures forananticipated, newhightemperature gascoolednuclearreactorproject.Receivedadditional specialassignments onCookPlantintheareasofcontrolofmodification, andtrackingofcommitments. | |||
6755B:1/112983B-3 RobertF.Kroeer(Page2)1971to19731970to1971Administrative Assistant totheAEPSCViceChairman, EnineerinandConstruction | |||
-Responsibilities werenumerousandwidelydiversified involving allfacetsofelectricutilityengineering, design,construction andoperation. | |||
Assignedresponsibilities forcoordination ofnumerousspecialprojects,. | |||
studiesandproblemsolvingtaskforces.Preparedresponses tooutsidecorrespondence foralllevelsofseniormanagement. | |||
Developed andimplemented anAEPSCengineering manpowermonitoring programstocontinually monitorchangesinengineering manpowerandtechnical levelofengineering. | |||
SeniorEnineer-Electrical EnineerinDivisionSecialAssinmenttoNuclearTaskForce-D.C.CookNuclearPlantElectrical Engineering DivisiongAprocedures, siteelectrical construction gAprocedures, electrical equipment specifications, originalcorporate wideseismicqualification specification, andelectrical equipment supplierqualification programs. | |||
Conducted preawardauditsofandinprocess surveillance onsuppliers ofsafetyrelatedelectrical equipment. | |||
Conducted numeroussiteauditsofelectrical construction activities. | |||
1965to1970Enineervariousrades-Electrical EnineerinDivision-Distribution SectionNYOffice-Primaryresponsibility wasforlongrangeplanningofthedistribution systemsfortwooftheAEPsystemoperating companies, including improvement plans,loadforecasts, systemoptimization, costanalyses, coordination ofplanswithtransmission planninggroupsandpresentation ofplanstocorporate management forapproval. | |||
Otherresponsibilities included: | |||
administration (furtherdevelopment ofandimplementation oftheAEPsystemwidedistribution transformers loadmonitoryprogram(programtopredictonastatistical basisthemonthlyandannualpeakloadsonover400,000distribution transformers); | |||
development andimplementation ofanAEPsystemsidedistribution systemtrouble,damageandinterruption reporting programtoprovidestatistical dataoncircuitandequipment "reliability" forplanningandequipment evaluation purposes; participated inataskforcetodevelopdistribution systemplanningguidelines; conducted numerousspecialstudiesondistribution systemequipment, construction standards andplanningcalculation techniques. | |||
67558:1/1129838-4 1963to1965RobertF.Kroeer(Page3)Associate Enineer-CantonOhioEnineerinOivision-Primaryresponsibiljties werebasically thesameasthoseshownfor1965to1970.Th'ispositionwasestablished aspartofanefforttodevelopanAEPSCengineering groupinCanton,Ohio.Aftertwoyears,thedecisionwasmadetotransferthedistribution planningfunction,to theAEPSCNewYorkoffice.1960to1963Indiana5MichianElectricComoanAssistant Engineer-SstemEnineerinOffice,Oistribution Section-Primaryresponsibilities wereforshortrangedistribution systemplanning, development ofdetailedworkplansforimplementation ofdistribution systemimprovements, andspecialcustomerrelatedstudies.Additional responsibilities included: | |||
evaluation ofsheetlightequipment, equipment utilization studiesandinstallation standards; continuous evaluation ofdistribution conductor connectsandassociated toolingandhardware. | |||
67558:1/112983 8-5 RESUME:RobertC.CarruthTITLE:HeadElectrical Generation SectionAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation EDUCATION: | |||
BachelorofEngineering 1965StevensInstitute ofTechnology MasterofEngineering | |||
-ElectricPowerSystemsEngineering 1967Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute PRESENT:ManagerElectrical Generation SectionElectrical Engineering DivisionAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation 1979-1981 Assistant ManagerofElectrical Generation SectionElectrical Engineering DivisionAEPSC:Executeabroadrangeoftechnical andadministrative responsibilities insupervision of,anorganization of40engineers andsupporting technical personnel involvedinallaspectsofPowerPlantElectrical DesignEngineering, including powerequipment specification andapplication, auxiliary powersystemdesign,application ofprotective relayingandprotective interlocking | |||
: circuits, designofrelayandsolidstatelogiccontrolsystems,application offaultdiagnostic equipment, performance ofequipment and,system failureanalysisandthemonitoring andupgrading ofinstalled andoperating electrical equipment andsystems.Specifictechnical andadministrative responsibilities include:Conducting JobPerformance Reviews.Administrative ofthetrainingandorientation programfornewtechnical personnel. | |||
Manpowerplanningandmanpowerallocation. | |||
Providing independent technical reviews.Participating inNuclearStandards Development. | |||
Participating inNuclearSafetyDesignReviewSub-Committee activities. | |||
Conducting specialstudiesinNuclearandFossilPlantDesign,construction andoperation relatedarea.Researchorconductevaluation ofsystemsorequipment misoperations, reportable occurrences, equipment | |||
: failures, etc.Participate inNuclearPlantSiteAudits.6755B:1/112983 B-7 R.C.CarruthPage2PreviousNuclearExerience1972-1979 SeniorEngineer, andProjectElectrical EngineerforD.C.CookNuclearPlant;two1100MWWestinghouse PWR's.Responsible fortechnical andadministrative supervision ofanorganization ofsixtotenengineers andengineering supportpersonnel involvedinconstruction, qualification, licensing, pre-operational testing,startupandpostoperational engineering anddesignsupport.Specifictechnical andadministrati've responsibilities included: | |||
Performing orsupervising hhedetaildesignofClassIEaswellasbalanceofplantelectrical systems,circuitsandcomponents. | |||
Preparation ofEquipment qualification testprocedures. | |||
Witnessacceptance testing.Supervise thepreparation ofplantsiteauditplans.Writeandsupervise thepreparation andexecution ofpre-operational testprocedures. | |||
Supervise thedevelopment andtestingofClassIEcomponents. | |||
Provideonsitestartuptechnical supportandsupervision. | |||
DevelopanEngineering Procedures Manual.Establish procedures forengineering qualitycontrol.Institute anEngineering equalityAssurance Program.Assistintheestablishment ofaCorporate DesignChangeControlProcess.Performworkplanning; scheduling manpowerandassignments. | |||
Personnel Performance Reviews.Supervise andprovidetechnical liaisontoaconsultant organization contracted tosupplement thepermanent staffassignedtotheProjectElectrical organization. | |||
6755B:1/112983B-8 R.C.CarruthPage3GeneralIndustrExerience1977-1979 SeniorEngineerandSupervisory Engineerfortheelectrical designofRacineHydroelectric Project.Responsible forconceptual aswellasdetailengineering oftheelectrical systems,protectives, plantcontrols, dispatchautomation andsupervisory anddiagnostic systemsforremoteunattended operations Specificareasofactivityincluded: | |||
Generation ofElectrical OneLines.Specification purchaseandapplication ofmajorelectrical systemsandhardwareincluding: | |||
600Vand6.9kVswitchgear. | |||
6.9kVIsolatedandNonSeg.Phasebus.Programmable controllers forcontrolanddispatchfunctions. | |||
Equipment statusandalarmmonitoring system.Remotesupervisory anddataacquisition system.Batterycharger,inverterandUPSsystem.Parameter monitoring anddatamanagement system.Designof'lantcontrolsandprotective interlockingcircuitsandlogic.Development ofdispatchalgorithims foreconomicdispatchofthefacility. | |||
Application ofgenerator andauxiliary powersystemprotective relaying. | |||
Integration ofplantcontrolsandoperation withsubtransmission systemrelayingandswitching requirements. | |||
Application ofstationoscillograph andplantsystemsstatusdiagnostic computerandannunciator systems.Application ofon-siteemergency dieselgeneration, andthedesignofautomatic loadshedding, restoration, re-transfer andtestingcircuitry. | |||
6755B:1/112983B-9 R.C.CarruthPage41969-1972 EngineerandSponsor(ProjectElectrical) | |||
Engineerfor.MitchellPlant-two800MWcoalfiredsuper-critical units:Responsible forelectrical controlandprotection, auxiliary powersystemsprotective | |||
: relaying, relatedoperatortrainingandrelatedstartupandcommissioning supervision. | |||
Specificresponsibilities andactivities included: | |||
Designofelectrical controlandpowercircuits. | |||
Application andsettingofprotective relays.Application ofswitchgear andotherswitching andprotective devices.Designofrelayanddigitalsolidstatelogicforplantcoalhandlingautomation. | |||
Designofrelaycontrollogicandinterlocking forplantsystems.Preparation ofoperatorreference systemdescriptions andoperating instructions. | |||
Prepareanddeliveroperatortrainingandorientation lecturesonkeyplantsystems.Writetestandcommissioning instructions. | |||
Provideon-sitetechnical supporttoconstruction andrelaycheckoutpersonnel. | |||
1968-1972 EngineerandProjectElectrical Engineerforthedesignandinstallation ofa345MVARsynchronous condenser installation aspartofa765kVEHVsystemexpansion. | |||
Responsibilities included: | |||
Designofallcontrolsandprotectives. | |||
Designofauxiliary powersystem.Ratingmajorelectrical components. | |||
Specification andpurchaseofcontrolcomponents, switchgear, transferswitches, auxiliary powerequipment, motorcontrolcenters,transformers. | |||
Reviewandapprovalofallvendorsuppliedsystems,including excitation, generator coolingwatertreatment anddemineralizer systemequipment, andallstartingsystemequipment including generator startingandrunningbusswitching equipment. | |||
6755B:1/112983B-10 R.C.CarruthPage51967"1969 Associate | |||
: Engineer, Assisting ProjectElectrical Engineerinvariousaspectsofastripmineexpansion project,automated coalhaulage(railroad), | |||
overlandconveyors, coalprocessing stationsandmisc.coalhandlingsystems.67558:1/112983 8"11 | |||
KARLJ.TOTHEDUCATION University ofSouthernCaliformia, M.A.,SystemManagement, 1968University ofOmaha,B.S.,MilitaryScience,1962CentralMichiganCollegeofEducation, 1950REGISTRATION Professional | |||
: Engineer, StateofCalifornia EXPERIENCE AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation, 1983-PresentNUSCorpodation, 1980-1983U.S.AirForce,1951-1980MichiganSchoolSystem,1950-1951AMERICANELECTRICPOWERSERVICECORPORATION | |||
-AssignedtotheNuclearSafetyandLicensing Sectionwithresponsibility forsafetyimplications ofallproposedD.C.CookNuclearPlantmodifications. | |||
Reviewsallproposedchangesfor10CFR50.59 requirements andD.C.Cooklicensing commitments totheNRC.NUS-Asaconsulting engineerwiththeConsequence Assessment Department, isresponsible fortheanalysisofprobabilities andconsequences ofindustrial andtransportation accidents. | |||
Conducted aircraftimpacthazardanalysisfortheSanOnofre,Skagit/Hanford, andHopeCreeknuclearpowerplantsandwroteSection3.5.1.6ofthepreliminary andfinalsafetyanalysisreports(PSARandFSAR)fortheHopeCreekplant.Performed analysisofprobabilities foraccidents | |||
: injuries, anddeathsfortheenvironmental impactstatement foraway-from-reactor fuelreceiving andstoragestationsatNuclearFuelServices, WestValley,NewYork;GeneralElectric, Morris,Illinois, andAlliedGeneralNuclearServices, | |||
: Barnwell, SouthCarolina. | |||
Conducted riskanalyses, including possibleaccidents scenarios, onmilitarydeployment anduseofkrypton-85 advancedairfieldlightingsystems.Performed excavatioon planningandtimeestimates fortheGinnaNuclearPowerPlant.Conducted accidentandriskanalysesofremotelypilotedvehiclesfortheU.S.Department ofEnergy.Theseanalysesincludedpossibleaccidentscenarios, failuremodes,andprobabilities. | |||
Inaddition, performed fieldsurveys,collected data,andmanagedprojectsforbothoffiteandonsitehazardsanalysisforcontrolroomhabitability forUnits1and2oftheSurry,Skagit/Hanford, andMidlandNuclearPowerPlants.Thisworkresultedinwritingrevisions toSection2.2oftheMidlandFSAR,which,includedanextensive studyandreport,andwritingSectionZ.ZoftheSkagit/Hanford PSARandtheHopeCreekFSAR~Participated intheIDCORAtomicIndustrial ForumonNuclearPowerPlantControlRoomOperatorHumanFactorsStudy.6755B:1/112983B-13 KARLJ.TOTHPage2U.S.AIRFORCE-Servedaspilotandinprogressive management positions inboththeoperations andsafetyfunctions. | |||
Attermination ofAirForcecareer,wasChiefofSafetyforAirForceSystemsCommand,withresponsibility forsystemsafety,reliability, maintainability, andoverallproductassurance forapproximately 90percentofthehardwareandsoftwarepurchased bytheU.S.AirForce.From1974through1977,wasresponsible forreviewing andapproving evacuation plansandcontrolcenteroperations for20installations intheeasternUnitedStates.Hashadextensive experience workingwithanddirecting postaccidents radiation-monitoring teams,decontamination teams,andaccidentinvestigations. | |||
AsChiefofSafetyandDisasterControl,from1962to1974,conducted evacuation studiesatsixnuclearinstallations; oneinJapan,twoinEurope,andthreeintheUnitedStates.Studiesincludedtimeestimates, routes,methods,andprocedures fordispersing personnel andcriticaldefenseequipment. | |||
Responsibilities alsoincludedestablishing anddirecting emergency controlcenterprocedures andoperations ateachlocation. | |||
Investigated acatastrophic bomberaircraftcrashinJapanwhichresultedinmanyunnecessary civiliancasualties. | |||
Theselosseswereattributed toalackofknowledge bythelocalpopulation. | |||
Asaresult,developed, andtranslated, anddistributed emergency procedures checklists forlocalofficials. | |||
Alsowroteanexplanation ofthehazardsandrisksandestablished simpleprocedures tobefollowedintheeventoffutureaccidents. | |||
Theseprocedures weretranslated andpublished inlocalpapersandbroadcast periodically onlocalradioandtelevision. | |||
Thesechecklists andnewsmediareleaseswerewellreceivedandsubsequently translated andsuccessfully usedatlocations inEuropeandintheUnitedStates.MEMBERSHIPS AmericanDefensePreparedness Association AmericanNuclearSocietyCertified HazardControlManagerInternational SocietyofAirSafetyInvestigators NationalAerospace Education Association NationalSocietyofProfessional Engineers SystemSafetySociety6755B:1/1129838-14 ARTHURS.GRZMESConsultin Mechanical EnineerThirtyfiveyearsexperience inmechanical engineering activities involving majorpowergenerating facilities intheUnitedStatesandZsrael.EDUCATZON: | |||
Pzofessional degreeinMechanical Engineering University ofCincinnati, 1948Additional Education: | |||
BusinessAdministration, AdelphiUniversity 1955Automatic Control,University ofMichigan1954EXPERZENCE: | |||
1978toPresentAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorConsulting Mechanical Engineer-Consultant tomechanical engineering andotherdisciplines inareasofautomatic control,plantoperation andthermalperformance. | |||
Performnuclearplantaudits.Consultonresearchprojects. | |||
1972-77Assistant DivisionManager-Mechanical Engineering Responsible formechanical engineering activities inplantmodification andoperation ofanuclearpowerplant.1955-72Manager,ResultsSection-Responsible fordesignandpurchaseofinstrumentation andcontrolsystems,steamcycleanalysis, andpezformancetestingofpowergenerating plants.Plantsincludedcoal,oil,nuclearandhydro.1950-551948-49Engineer-Responsible fordesignandpurchaseofinstrumentation andcontrolsystemsforfossilpowerplants.AalachianPowerCo.,Loan,WestViriniaResultsEngineerresponsible formaintenance ofinstruments andcontrolsandforperformance testingincoalfiredpowerplant.PROFESSZONAL AFFZLZATZON: | |||
Fellow,AmericanSocietyofMechanical Engineers Chapter8,PumpHandbook-McGraw-Hill 1976Operating Experience WithTheCardinalPlantTrainingSimulator | |||
-AmericanNuclearSociety1970ServiceExperience WithAnalogComputers ForUtilityPowerPlants-AmericanPowerConf.1962 CMeasurement ofDensityandMoistureinaLargeCoalStoragePile-AmericanPowerConf.1961Application ofanAutomatic DigitalDataCollecting SystemToThePhiloSupercritical Unit,AmericanPowerConf.1958ThermalPerformance OfThePhiloSupercritical Unit-AmericanSocietyofMechanical Engineers, 1958PATENTS:4,343,682 Feedwater HeatingMeansforNuclearUnitsDuringStart-upandMethodofControlling Same.3,721,898, Apparatus forDetecting LeakageFromorRuptureofPipesandOtherVesselsContaining FluidUnderPressure. | |||
3,211,135 SteamGenerator UnitContxolSystem SummaryResumeofTHOMASB.SHERIDANThomasB.SheridanattendedPurdueUniversity (B.S.1951)and,aftertwoyearsinmilitaryservice(Aeromedical Laboratory, WrightPatterson AirForceBase, | |||
~\ | ~\ | ||
ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXDTASKPLANCRITIQUEINSTRUCTIONS 1.AttachacopyofSection,4,0.2.Fillintherequiredinformation andanswerallquestions. | |||
3.ExplainallNOanswersindetail.4.Whencomplete, turnintoyourimmediate supervisor. | |||
1.NameofRespondent: | |||
2.NameofPlant:3.DateofSurvey:4.Wereallofthecriteriacorrectandappropriateforthistask(donotexplaincriteriathatwereN/AbecauseSystem/CR didnothavethatdesignfeature)? | |||
YESNO5.Didthetaskplaninstructions presenttheeasiestandbestmethodology forperforming theassessment? | |||
YESNO6.Werethedatacollection formsadequate? | |||
YESNO}} |
Revision as of 07:40, 29 June 2018
ML17334A494 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook ![]() |
Issue date: | 12/02/1983 |
From: | AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP., CANYON RESEARCH CORP., WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML17320A900 | List: |
References | |
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 PROC-831202, NUDOCS 8401040196 | |
Download: ML17334A494 (202) | |
Text
PROGRAMPLANREPORTforaDETAILEDCONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWforIndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyDonaldC.CookUnits1and2toTheUnitedStatesNuclearRegulatory Commission Revision1Oecember2,1983preparedbyAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation andWestinghouse
'lectricCorporation CanyonResearchGroup840i04019h 83i229,PDRADQCK050003i5F---'PDR TABLEOFCONTENTSSectionTitle~PaeINTRODUCTION l-l.General1-2.1-6.1-9.Background 1-3.PlantDescription 1"4.Definition ofControlRooms1-5.ControlRoomStatusScopeoftheProgramObjectives oftheProgramDCRDRProgramActivities Definition ofTerms1-21-21-21"31-31-41-51-7MANAGEMENT ANDSTAFFING2-1.Purpose2-2.DCRDRTeamInterfaces 2-3.Management Function2-4.ProjectReviewTeam2-5.DesignReviewTeam2-6.Assessment Team2-12-12-12-12-22-22-4DOCUMENTATION ANDDOCUMENTCONTROL3-1.Introduction 3-2.Reference Documentation 3-3.DCRDR-Generated Documentation 3-4.DocumentControl3-13-13"13-23-3DESCRIPTION OFPHASEI,PLANNING4-1.Introduction 4-2.DCRDRMilestones 4-3.ControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport4-14-14-16755B:1/112583 TABLEOFCONTENTS(cont)SectionTitle~paeDESCRIPTION OFPHASEII,REVIEW5-1.Introduction 5-2.ReviewPhaseStaffing5-3.Methodology forReviewPhaseTasks5-4.Task1--Operating Experience Review5-5.Task2-SystemFunctionandTaskAnalysis5-6.Task3-ControlRoomInventory, 5-7.Task4--ControlRoomHumanFactorsSurvey5-8.Workspace Survey5-9.Anthropometric Survey5-10.Emergency Equipment Survey5-11.Heating,Ventilating, andAirConditioning Survey5-12.Illumination Survey5-13.AmbientNoiseSurvey5-14.Maintainability Survey5-15.Communications Survey5-16.Annunciator SystemsReview5-17.ControlsSurvey5-18.DisplaysSurvey5-19.LabelsandLocationAids5-20.ComputerSystemReview5-21.Conventions Survey5-22.Task5--Verification ofControlRoomFunction5-23.Task6--Validation ofControlRoomFunctions 5-24.ProductsoftheReviewPhase5-15-15-15-25-25-35-35-35-45-45-55-45-55-55-55-55-65-65-65-65-65-75-75-75-76755B:1/112583 TABLEOFCONTENTS(cont)SectionTitle~PaeDESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-A,ASSESSMENT 6-1.Introduction 6-2.Methodology 6-16-16-2DESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-B,IMPLEMENTATION 7-1DESCRIPTION OFPHASEIV,REPORTING 8-1COORDINATION WITHNUREG0737,SUPPLEMENT 1,ACTIVITIES 9-110QUALITYASSURANCE 10-1SUMMARYAppendixALiSTOFABBREVIATIONS A-1AppendixBRESUMESOFKEYPERSONNEL B-lAppendixCANNUNCIATOR SURVEYTASKPLANC-16755B:1/112583 LISTOFILLUSTRATIONS Fi<iureTitie~PaeRelationship ofNUREG0660TaskActionItems1-2GeneralArrangement DrawingofDonaldC.CookUnits1and2ControlRooms1"3Functional LayoutDrawingofDonaldC.CookUnit1ControlRoomPanels1-13Functional LayoutDrawingofDonaldC.CookUnit2ControlRoomPanels1-151-5ListofAbbreviations andFunctions forControlPanels1-171-6FourMajorPhaseActivities fortheDCRORProgram1-192-1OCRDRProgramOrganization Structure 2-52-2DCRDRProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringPlanning2-72-3OCRORProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringReview2-9OCRORProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringAssessment 2-112"5OCRDRProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringImple-mentation 2-132-6DCRDRProgramReviewTeamInterfaces DuringReporting 2-154-1PlanningPhaseDevelopment Outline4-34-2OCRDRProgramScheduleforPhasesIandII4-56755B:1/112583 LISTOFILLUSTRATIONS (cont)~FiureTitle~pae6-1Assessment Methodology Chart6-36-2HumanEngineering Discrepancy Evaluation FlowChart6-56-3HEOCategoryGuidelines 6-78"1SampleofProgramSummaryReportFormat(2Sheets)8-39-1ScheduleofPerformance 9-36755B:1/112583viii SECTIONIINTRODUCTION 1-1.GENERALThisProgramPlanReportdescribes theplantoperformadetailedcontrolroomdesignreview(OCROR)oftheDonaldC.CookUnits1and2nuclearpowergeneration stationsoperatedbytheIndianaandMichiganElectricComoany(IEMECo).ThepurposeoftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramistostudyandevaluate, fromahumanengineering pointofview,thetotalcontrolroomworkspace,environment, instrumentation,
- controls, andotherequipment forbothsystemdemandsandoperatorcapabilities andtoidentify, assess,andrecommend controlroomdesignmodifications/enhancements tocorrectidentified inadequacies intheexistingdesign.TheapproachoftheDCRORProgramwillbetoperformatotalreviewontheUnit1controlroom.ThenareviewoftheUnit2controlroomwillbedonetodetermine thedifferences betweenunits.TheUnit2controlroomreviewwillbebasedontheresultsoftheUnit1review,withalldifferences beingaddressed separately.
Therefore, thisreviewtechnique willensurethatallasoecsofheUnits1and2control.oomswillbeevaluated forhuaanrac:ors.Thisprogramispartofanintegrated plantoaddresstheTMI-related actionsreferenced inTMI-2ActionPlan,NUREG-0660.
Theplanwillincludeaconsideration oftherelationship ortheDCRORProgramwithNUREG0737,Supplement 1(figure1-1),including thefollowing:
I~Designing controlroommodifications whichcorrecconditions adversetosafety(reducing significant contributions torisk)andconsidering theadditionoftheinstrumentation necessary toimplement Regulatory Guide1.976755B:I/062883
~Verifying thesafetyparameter displaysystem(SPOS),datadisplay,andfunction~Usingselectedplant-specific, symptom-based emergency operating procedures forverifying andvalidating controlroomfunctions
~Communication interface withtheTechnical SupportCenter,Emergency Operations
- Facility, andtheOperating SupportCenterIKMECohascommittedthenecessary resources, including Ynowleageable management andtechnical personnel fromtheplantstaff,AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation (AEPSC).technical consultants fromWestinghouse ElectricCorporation, andhumanactorsspecialists FromCanyonResearchGrouptoeffectheprogramcefinedherein.1-2.BACKGROUNO 1-3PlantOes-,i-tonTheIndianaanaMichiganElectricCompanyiscurrently ooerating atwo-unitnuclearpowerplantlocatedalongtheeasternshoreofLakeMichiganinLakeTownship, BerrienCounty,Michigan, approximateiy
'milessouth-sou hwestorBentonHarbor.ThisFaciliyhasbeendesignated theDonaldC.CookUr.i:s1and2wnichbegancommercial operation inAugustof1975andJulyor1979,'esoectively.
=achunitcontainssWestinghouse-supplied four-loop nuclearsteamsuoplysystem(Unit1-3250M<t,1030KdeNetandUnit2-3411'Kft,1100i&feNet).
'oneturbinegenerators forUnits1and2wererurnisned oyGeneral"=;ectric ancBrownBoveri,respectively.
Thearchitect~'engineer Forbothuni:sisAEPSC.1-4.Oefinition ofControlRoomsTheOonaldC.CookUnits1and2controlroomsareessentially identical.
Thecontrolroomforeachunitisdefined,ForthepurposesoftheOCRDRProgram,6755B:I/0628831-2 asthepanelsandotherequipment inthemaincontrolboardareaincluding theSPDSdisplaysandthehotshutdownpanels.Ageneralarrangement drawingisillustrated infigure1-2;functional layoutdrawingsofthecontrolroompanelsareshowninfigures1-3and1-4,andacomprehensive tabulation ofthismaterialisshowninfigure1-5.1"5.ControlRoomStatusThemaincontrolboardsareoperational andcompleteexceptforthoseareasofactivitywhicharenowbeingperformed toaddresstherequirements setforthbyNUREG0737,Supplement 1.1-6.SCOPEOFTHEPROGRAMTheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramcoversthehumanengineering reviewoftheverticaloperational andassociated hotshutdownpanelsidentified inparagraph 1-4,andthecontrolroomworkspace andenvironment.
Theequipment tobereviewedincludesalldisplays,
- controls, peripheral
- consoles, communication equipment, ancillary devices,andothermaincontrolboardcomponents withwhichthecontrolroomoperators interface.
Duringthereviewprocess,thegovernment regulations andguidelines listedbelowandotherrelatedindustrystandards andguidelines willbeusedforinformation orbackground:
~NUREG0659(staffsupplement to1580)~NUREG0660(actionplanasaresultofTMI-2accident)
~NUREG0694(TMI-related requirement fornewoperating licensees)
~NUREG0696(functional criteriaforemergency responsefacilities)"
~NUREG0700(controlroomhumanengineering guidelines)
~NUREG0737(clarification ofTMIactionplanrequirements) 6755B:I/062883 1-3
~NUREG0737,Supplement I(requirements foremergency responsecapability) eNUREG0801(draftevaluation criteriaforcontrolroomdesignreview)~NUREG0814(methodology forevaluation ofemergency responsefacilities)
~NUREG0835(humanfactorsacceptance criteriaforSPDS)~NUREG0899(guidelines forthepreparation ofemergency operating procedures)
~Regulatory Guide1.47(bypassed andinoperable statusindication)
~Regulatory Guide1.97,Revision2(postaccident monitoring instrumentation) 1-7.OBJECTIVES OFTHEPROGRAMTheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramwillbeconducted toachievethefollowing objectives:
~Determine whethertheexistingcontrolroomdesignprovidesthesystemstatusinformation, controlcapabilities,
- feedback, andanalytical aidsnecessary forcontrolroomoperators toperformtheirfunctions effectively
~Identifycharacteristics oftheexistingcontrolroominstrumentation,
- controls, otherequipment, andphysicalarrangements whichmaysignificantly impair/impede controlroomoperatorperformance
~Analyzeandevaluatetheproblemswhichcouldoccurduringemergency conditions, andidentifymeansofcorrecting thosediscrepancies whichcouldleadtosubstantial operational orsafetyconcerns6755B:I/062883 1-4
~Verifyandvalidatetheproposedmeansofcorrection toprovideaneffective planofactionwhichapplieshumanfactorsprinciples toimprovethecontrol'oom designandenhanceoperatorefficiency andeffectiveness
~Integrate theOCRDRProgramwithotherareaofhumanfactorsidentified intheNRCTaskActionPlan~Provideeffective coordination ofcontrolroomenhancements and/ormodifications withidentifications ofNUREG0696andRegulatory Guide1.97considerations, plantoperating/emergency procedures development, andtheimplementation oftrainingasnecessary toensurethatcontrolroomoperators canfunctionadequately withanycontrolroomdesignchanges~EnsurethattheresultsofthistotaleffortmeettheintentofNUREG0737,ItemI.D.l,andNUREG0700.Inaddition, performtheOCRORProgramcognizant ofthesedocuments asclarified inNUREG0737,Supplement 1,Item5.2.a1-8.OCRORPROGRAMACTIVITIES Thedesignreviewprocesswilladdressfourmajorphasesofactivity(figure1-6):oPHASEIPLANNiNG(section,4).TheProgramPlanReportfortheD.C.CookUnits1and2DCRORandthepreliminary ControlRoomHumanEngineering Criteria(CRHEC)Reportwillprovidethebasisforthedesignreview.~PHASEII--REVIEW(section.5).DuringtheReview'hase, datawillbecollected, reduced,andanalyzedtoobserveanddocumentwhethertheexistingcontrolroomdesignprovidesoperators withthecapabilities necessary toperformtheirfunctionandtasksundernormaland67558:1/062883 1-5 emergency operating conditions.
ResultsofPhaseIIactivitywillgeneratetasksummaryreportsandalistingofdepartures fromtheControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport.~PHASEIII-A-ASSESSMENT (section6).Ouringthisphase,anassessment willbemadeofthesignificance andimpactofthedepartures fromtheCRHECreportsidentified inPhaseII.Forthose'departures assessedassignifi-cant,recommended designchanges/enhancements willbedeveloped.
oPHASEIII-B--IMPLEMENTATION (section7).Aftertheassessment hasIIbeencompleted andallcorrective actionsidentified, aschedulewillbedeveloped toensuretheintegration oftheproposedcontrolroomchangeswithotherpost-TMIprograms, refueling outages,andothercompanymodifications.
~PHASEIVREPORTING (section8).AProgramSummaryReportwillbepreparedwhichwilldocumenttheoverallreviewprocess,describeandidentifyallofthehumanengineering discrepancies'and
- findings, andsummarize allOCRORactivities, methodologies, andproposedcontrolroomimprovements andschedules.
Eachphasewillbeperformed byateamofspecialists fromI&MECo,AEPSC,Westinghouse, andCanyonResearchGroup.Oisciplines represented ontheteamwillincludeinstrumentation andcontrolengineering, nuclearsafetyandli-censing,electrical engineering, humanfactors,plantoperations, qualityassurance, projectengineering, andtrainingtomaximizetheefficiency oftheeffortandtocompletethetotalreviewidentified inthisProgramPlanReport.6755B:I/062883 1-6 I"9.DEFINITION OFTERMSAlistofabbreviations andacronymsiscontained inappendixAtothisreport.Also,toalleviate ambiguity ofterms,thefollowing definitions areprovided:
ControlRoomEnhancement.
Achangetoapiece'ofequipment, suchasacontrolpanel,whichcanbeperformed withoutinterfering withtheoperation ofthatequipment.
Suchchangesmightincludetheapplication oflabelsordemarcation lines.ControlRoomModification.
Achangetoapieceofequipment, suchasacontrolpanel,whichislikelytointerfere withtheoperation ofthatequipment onwhichthechangeisbeingperformed.
Suchchangesincludetheremovalorrelocation ofanexistingcontrolpanelcomponent ortheadditionofapanelcomponent.
EmerencOperatinProcedures.
Plantprocedures whichguide,theoperator(s) duringatransient oremergency condition.
EmerencResponseGuidelines.Symptom-based guidelines fromwhichemergency operating procedures aredeveloped.
HumanEnaineerin
.Thescienceofoptimizing theperformance ofhumanbeingsandthedesignofequipment formoreefficient usebyhumanbeings'uman Enoineerin Discreanc.Adeparture fromtheestablished humanfactorscriteriaforthecontrolroomdesignwhichcouldimpair/impede operatorperformance.
Photomosaic.
Ascaledphotographic reproduction ofthemaincontrolroompanels.SafetParameter DislaSstem.Displaysystemwhichprovidescontinuous indication ofplantparameters toassistcontrolro'ompersonnel inevaluating thesafetystatusoftheplant.6755B:I/0628831-7 Validation.
Theprocessofdetermining whetherthephysicaldesignsupportstheprocedures foroperation inanadequatemannertosupporteffective integrated performance ofthefunctions ofthecontrolroomoperating crew.Verification.
Theprocessofdetermining whetherinstrumentation,
- controls, andotherequipment meetthespecificrequirements ofthetasksperformed byoperators.
6755B:1/062883 PLANT'CIFICEMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES (EOPs)NUREG0899SYMPTOM-BASED OPERATING ANDEMERGENCY PROCEDURES NUREG0799NUREG0660I.C.1,I.C.8,&I.C.9CHANGESINREQUIREMENTSFORTRAININGANDSTAFFINGNUREG0660I.A.1&IA.2TMIACTIONPLANNUREG0660NUREG0737DETAILEDCONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWPRELIMINARY CONTROLROOMHUMANENGINEERING CRITERIAREPORTPROGRAMPLANREPORTNUREG0700PRCAPERTURECARDDCRDRPROGRAM SUMMARYREPORT'OST-ACCIDENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION REG.GUIDE1.97'AlsoAvailable 6zApertureCardSAFETYPARAMETER DISPLAYSYSTEMNUBEG0660,III,A.12NUREG0835EMERGENCY RESPONSEFACILITYNUREG0696NUREG0814Figurel-l.Relationship ofNUREG0660TaskActionItems1-9s401040196
-o) 0PN UNIT1CONTROLROOMUNIT2CONTROLROOMUNIT2HOTSHUTDOWNAREAUNIT1HOTSHUTDOWNAREAFigure1-2.GeneralArrangement DrawingofDonaldC.CookUnits1and2ControlRooms BARCOTUSGPRZFPRCPCPRHROPERATOR'S CONSOLEPSSOCRTASISSPYPSSCRTBRMSBISICRTCRTCRTCCWESWNESWCOMPUTEROPERATOR'S CONSOLETYPEWRITER SANISIVVSSVEFRMSCABINETFFCMFXAPOMSFlCWFigure1-3.Functional LayoutOrawingofOonaldC.CookUnit1ControlRoomPanels6755B:1/0628831-13 PANELFFCMFXAPDMSFIDCABINETCWSVEFVSIVNISSANESWTYPEWRITER
+COMPUTEROPERATOR'S CONSOLEESWCCWBISIBISIRMSCRTCRTPSSDCRTBSPYSISCPPSSDCRTAOPERATOR'S CONSOLERHRRCPFPPRZSGDTURCFLXBAFigure1-4.Functional LayoutDrawingofDonaldC.CookUnit2ControlRoomPanels67558:1/062883 1-15 FLXRCOTUSGFPCPSABAPRZRCPRHRSISSPYCCWESWFluxPanelRodControlPanelOe)taTandUnitPanelSteamGenerator PanelFeedPumpPanelCondensate Polishing PanelCondensate PanelTurbinePanelStationAuxiliary PanelGenerator PanelBoricAcidPanelPressurizer PanelReactorCoolantPumpPanelResidualHeatRemovalPanelSafety'injection SystemPanelContaiqment SprayPanelComponent CoolingWaterPanelEssential ServiceWaterPanelNESW-Nonessential ServiceWaterPanelIVVSEFSVNISFIRMSFFCMFXAPMSFIDRMSCWIsolation ValvesPanelVents.latlon PanelEmergency FirePanelPlantServicePanelNuclearInstrumentation CabinetsFixedIn-CorePanelRadiation Monitoring SystemPanelFailedFuelCommunications PanelMovableIn-coreCabinetAxialPowerDistribution Monitoring SystemCabinetFixedIn-coreCabinetRadiation Monitoring SystemCabinetCirculating WaterPanelFigureI"5.ListofAbbreviations andFunctionforControlPanels6755B:I/062883 1-17 ugQIz0ZUJa2cgCg5zUgCLCL+CaCaCCCa>OOOOCCCa0Z.CLug00.Coa:20II2ug0CLChz0IOOCC2agag'D22Ezcn00IOOIUOILZ~gI-0UgI2ulcnlu0OQZJugugzE~a~CCnugulooluUlCnDluggIL~~cn0ca220ID0ICn208t'TIILI<Icaa.(-5O)Qm]I>UgIch>)L(Jo+0OoUg0Zca>ZcaOzOzOZILcaOg00caI-Zl-gl-oIOlu0g2oguoZ~X..-~cucnug~IUlu~gcnZZ<)I-I-Oolu0CCZUJCL~ugca~o<ca<zox wc@InviaUJ20ID0CnID200zoO2gzI20II2I0I0cn<2IL00hl-CLEOCZDC)20IO2E0OOcaIO2zCJ022020CCD2IZIuOIu324gz82g02CCoo0ggOI-iogvzCCgIlgg0IUgluluI~>2cav0UgNOgcn2ca-QWQI5ICCcn20-2IUOIUE~C0CJCaIQZQ0cC4caaug0.0.caQPgOzCaOOZCCCCg'2Oa.UgY)calu0OQ2luOQlZIU0,coQOzl-22Ug~UugILca300caIZCLIL2CaIOOCUCaIVIUQ2+2CLugcaca~a<2~O.ZUJ<OgzaCCUl)CUE~lugaoca00.ZVYcaIXIU0ZcaZQgOcaI00>CCu.CJCaKx<CLUliIca)~COIQ~0~2luz~caa:COOI-zca2+~ZCC00.5caI-UJQlucfO0I->ILa:~CC0zoIuI-0QcgtcocaQ0gI>2cacnIL0UICJUJIgZYVIu00Iu0gaZZILUgO20IIUO0I~ILIUCL02CC22Ul2CCIOQugDozzu.0.I~R0oOu.2CCII-UgOoCLUJ~IUl(yO2ooIL-CacnZCaPuQO-coVzUgILCCN0CU>cnUga2cazX~QCnol<~u00Ugcap<00.ILozcn0CCIZOQZ<u.2IU~IUugIuzozozUgILZQZo8~~Iul~QcaZCn02ozozol=$zcagEa:CCPy400caca0II220UgVQUJIUI<0IP2ECaCaCCCao020ca02a.OKRaIZCClgJOg00.Icag000luO~CQ2caIL2I0D2cnCC0.Co2CCI-zo0.UgQCnZ0I0IUILIUIUIZ:zzQOo~~ugIU1CLIIzIII20I~CzI-o2-luI0.0.FgoOPRCAPERTURECAROI0oIL2DZOQ200a.~,0g~gaableOILApertureCard$-0$-0ncclcoI1-198401040196W~2 04t~(f~U, SECTION2MANAGEMENT ANDSTAFFING2-1.PURPOSEThepurposeofthissectionistoidentifytheOCRORProgramteamsandtheirareasofresponsibility.
Figure2-1detailstheorganizational structure ofpersonnel involvedintheOCRORProgram.(}ualifications ofkeypersonnel areprovidedinappendixB.Allpersonnel ontheDonaldC.CookOCRDRProgramteamswillmeetorexceedthequalifications providedinNUREG0801andrelatedguidance.
2-2.DCRDRTEAMINTERFACE Toeffectively performtheDCRORProgramandstillbeabletobesuccessfully audited,aninterface betweenthevariousreviewteamsisrequired.
The"OCRDRProgramLeadEngineer" willbetheprimarycontactandliasionforthemanagement organization, designreview,projectreview,andassessment teams.Figures2-2through2-6showthesevariousinterfaces.
2-3.MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONThemanagement functionfortheOCRDRProgramwillbeprovidedunderpreviously established AEPSCprocedural requirements andresponsibilities definedinAEPSCGeneralProcedure 25,"Engineering DesignChanges,"
andGeneralProcedure 32,"Preparation ofSubmittals totheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission."
Thefunctionofmanagement isto:~Approvethe'Program PlanReport~Reviewandapproverecommendatons forcontrolroomdesignchangesI6755B:I/062883 2-1
~Providetheresources necessary forimplementation oftheDCROR~ApprovetheProgramSummaryReport~Providethemechanism forthepreparation andsubmittal ofdocuments totheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission.,
2-4.PROJECTREVIEWTEAMTheProjectReviewTeamwillcoordinate theDCRORProgram.Typicalteamfunctions areto:~ApproveTaskPlanspriortoperformance ofassociated ReviewTaskA~EnsurethattheDCRDRProgramisperformed inaccordance withtheAEPSCgualityAssurance Program~ProvideoverallsupporttotheDCRORprocess~MonitortheDCRORprogressoEnsurethatthedesignreviewobjectives andtasks,inrelationtootherNUREG0660efforts,areproperlycoordinated
~Establish andinitiateacontrolroomimprovement programKeypersonnel fortheProjectReviewTeamareidentified infigure2-1.2-5.DESIGNREVIEWTEAMTheDesignReviewTeamcomprises thequalified multidiscipline personnel toperformthevariousreviewfunctions.
Theareasofexpertise include:~NSSSandbalance-of-plant systems~Instrumentation andcontrol6755B:1/062883r2-2
~Conrolboarddesign~Humanfactors~Plantoperations (licensed operators)
~Training~Licensing/nuclear safetyThefunctionoftheDesignReviewTeamistocarryouttheentiredesignreviewprograminaccordance withtheguidelines detailedinthisProgramPlanReport.DesignReviewTeamresponsibilities includethefollowing:
~DeveloptheProgramPlanReport~DeveloptheLicenseeEventReportReviewReport~DeveloptheControlRoomInventory
~Developforms/checklists
~DevelopTaskPlansoDevelopControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReportoPerformReviewTasks~DevelopTaskSummaryReports~AssistAssessment Teamastechnical support~,DevelopImplementation Plans~DeveloptheProgramSummaryReport6755B:I/062883 2-3 Keypersonnel fortheDesignReviewTeamareidentified infigure2-1.2-6.ASSESSMENT TEAMTheAssessment Teamwill:~Evaluatethesignificance oftheobserveddepartures fromtheCRHECReportidentified inthePhaseIIreview~Identifytheapplicable departures ashumanengineering discrepancies (HED)~AssignacategoryandprioritytotheHEDsforscheduling ofcorrective action~Review/approve controlroomrecommendations forHEDcorrective actionpriortoorigination ofarequestforchange(AEPSCprocedure 25).Keypersonnel fortheAssessment Teamareidentified infigure2-1.6755B:I/0628832-4 P10J1CZREVIZÃTEAM*DCBDRProgramMninistrator:
A.S.Grims*DCRDRProgramLeadEngineer:
R.F.Shoemaker
- DCRDRProgramPlantCoordinator:
T.R.Stephens*DCRDRProgramProjectEngineer:
F.VanPelt,Jr.*DCRDRProgramManager(Westinghouse):
J.D.Young*~SCHumanFactorsConsultant:
Dr.T.SheridanDESIGNREVI1%TEAM*DCRDRProgramAdministrator:
A.S.Grieves*DCBDRProgramLeadEngineer/AEPSC I&CEngineer:
R.F.Shor*AEPSCNuclearSafety&Licensing Engineer:
K.J.Toth*I&MEG3ReactorOperators
- DCRDRProgramPlantCoordinator:
T.R.Stephens*AEPSCQualityAssurance Engineer:
J.B.Brittan~*DCRDRProgramProjectEngineer:
F.VanPelt,Jr.*AEPSCElectrical Engineer:
L.P.~co*DCRDRProgramManager(Westinghouse):
J.D.Young*DCRDRHumanFactorsConsultant (CanyonResearch):
Dr.G.A.Elliff*I&MECO&Westinghouse TrainingPersonnel
- Westinghouse TrainingPersonnel:
R.J.Wartenberg ASSESSMENT TEAM*DCRDRProgramAdnunistrator:
A.S.Grimes*DCRDRProgramLeadEngineer:
R.F.Shor*AEPSCI&CSectionManager:J.C.Jeffrey*AEPSCNuclearSafetyandLicensing SectionManager:J.G.Feinstein
- D.C.CookPlantManagemnt:B.A.Svensson*AEPSCHumanFactorsConsultant:
Dr.T.Sheridan*I&MECOSeniorReactorOperator(s)
- ArPSCManagerofQualityAssurance:
R.F.Kroeger*AEPSCElectrical Generation SectionManager:R.C.CarruthFigure2-1.DCRDRProgramOrganization Structure 6755B:1/062883 2-5
DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~PREPAREPROGRAMPLANREPORTPROJECTREVIEWTEAMI~APPROVEPROGRAMPLANREPORTPROGRAMPLANREPORTACCEPTABLE SUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENTS YESAEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.32"PREPARATION OFSUBMITTALS TONRC"MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
~SUBMITPROGRAMPLANREPORTTONRCPROGRAMPLANREPORTNRC6755B:I/070583 Figure2-2.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseI,Planning2-7 DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~DEVELOPTASKPLAN~DEVELOPCONTROLROOMINVENTORY
~PERFORMREVIEW~DEVELOPLERREVIEWREPORT~~DEVELOPTASKSUMMARYREPORT~DEVELOPFORMS/CHECKLISTS
~DEVELOPCRHECREPORTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT PROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/APPROVE/COMMENT
-TASKSUMMARYREPORT-FORMS/CHECKLISTS NOTASKSUMMARYREPORTACCEPTANCE YESINPUTTOPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTSEEFIGURE2406755B:I/070583eFigure2-3.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseII,Review2-9 ASSESSMENT TEAM~DETERMINE SIGNIFICANCE OFHEDS~REVIEW/APPROVECONTROLROOMENHANCEMENTS/
RETROFITS DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~ASSISTINHEDEVALUATION
~DEVELOPFINALCRHECDOCUMENTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT PROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/COMMENT/APPROVE
-FINALCRHECDOCUMENT-ASSESSMENT REPORTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT NOASSESSMENT REPORTACCEPTANCE YESINPUTTOPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTSEEFIGURE2.60Figure2-4.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseIII-A,Assessment 6755B:I/070583 2-11 SUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT NOCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTACCEPTABLE YESASSESSMENT TEAM~DEVELOPCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORT~DEVELOPIMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULEDESIGNREVIEWTEAM~ASSISTINDEVELOPMENT OFCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORT~ASSESSCONTROLROOMIMPROVEMENTSFORDEPARTURES FROMTHECRHECDOCUMENTPROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/COMMENT APPROVECONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORTAEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.25"ENGINEERING DESIGNCHANGE"MANAGEMENT FUNCTION~REVIEW/APPROVE CONTROLROOMENHANCEMENTS/
MODIFICATIONS SEEFIGURE24CFigure2-5.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseIII-B,Implementation 6755B:I/070583 2-13 DESIGNREVIEWTEAM~DEVELOPPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTSUPERVISORY REVIEW/COMMENT PROJECTREVIEWTEAM~REVIEW/COMMENT/
APPROVEPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTACCEPTABLE YESNOASSESSMENT REPORTSFROMFIGURE24BTASKSUMMARYREPORTSFROMFIGURE2.3APROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTMANAGEMENT FUNCTION~APPROVEPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORT~SUBMITPROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTTONRCCONTROLROOMIMPLEMENTATION REPORTFROMFIGURE2-5CAEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.32"PREPARATION OFSUBMITTALS TONRC"PROGRAMSUMMARYREPORTNRCFigure2-6.Personnel Interface andInformation FlowDiagramforPhaseIV,Reporting 6755B:I/070583 2-15 SECTION3DOCUMENTATION ANDDOCUMENTCONTROL3-1.INTRODUCTION Acompleteandup-to-date libraryofreference information isnecessary tomanageandperformthevariousphasesoftheDCRDRProgram.Thislibrarywillprovidesupportduringthedesignreviewaswellasadatabaseforfuturecontrolroommodifications.
3"2.REFERENCE DOCUMENTATION Thefollowing documentation willbeusedduringthereviewphase:~.Controlroomdrawings(panellayouts,floorplan,andthelike)~Controlboardequipment specifications
~Controlpanelphotographs (photomosaic)
~Controlroompreliminary assessments
~Description ofcodingconventions
~OriginalandUpdatedFSARforD.C.CookUnits1and2~Instrumentation andcontroldiagrams~Operatortrainingmaterial~Systemsfunctiontaskanalysis6755B:1/0628833-1
~Listsofacronymsandabbreviations
~Pipingandinstrumentation drawings~Plantcomputersoftwaredescription andsampleprintout~Procedures (emergency, normal,andthelike)~Systemdescriptions
~Regulatory guidesandNUREGs(paragraph 1-6)~Controlroominventory list~AEPSCqualityassurance procedure
~LicenseeeventreportsAnyadditional reference materialidentified bythedesignreviewteamduringthereviewphase(PhaseII)willbeobtainedandaddedtothelibrary.BecauseO.C.CookUnits1and2areoperating, accesstothecontrolroomswillbelimited.Therefore, photomosaics willbeusedtaperformmostofthetasksoutlinedinsection5.3-3.OCROR-GENERATEO DOCUMENTATION Thedocumentation generated bythedesignreviewprocesswillbesubjecttothosecontrolsidentified inparagraph 3-4.Thefollowing documentation willbeproducedbytheOCRORprocess:oProgramPlanReport(thisdocument)
~Controlroomoperating personnel surveys6755B:I/062883 3-2
~Controlroominventory
~Controlroomhumanfactorsurveys~Taskplans,checklists, datacollection forms,sketches, photographs, andphotomosaics usedinthereviewand.assessment/recommendation phases~Controlroomhumanengineering criteriareport~Licenseeeventreport(LER)review~ProgramSummaryReport3-4.DOCUMENTCONTROLAcontrolled-access filewillbeestablished forallhardcopyDCRDRProgramoutputdocuments.
Inaddition, thesedocuments willbeenteredintoacomputer-based datasystem.Accesstothesefileswillbecontrolled bytheDCRDRprogrammanager.67558:1/062883 3-3 P.Ill SECTION4DESCRIPTION OFPHASEI,PLANNING4-I.INTRODUCTION Theplanningphaseconsistsofdeveloping awell-defined workprogramwhichoutlinesspecificrecommendations forpersonnel, reference
- material, anddocumentation neededtoperformtheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgram(figure4-1).IEMECointendstocommencewiththeDCRDRProgramasdocumented inthisProgramPlanReportpriortoformalacceptance bytheNRC.Anydeficiencies notedinthisProgramPlanReportshouldbebroughttotheattention ofaI&MECoinatimelymanner.Finalacceptance ofthisdocumentwillendthePlanningPhase.4-2.DCRDRMILESTONES AscheduleforPhasesIandIIofthisProgramPlanwasdeveloped andisincludedasfigure4-2.AsstatedintheI8MECoresponsetoG.L.82-33(AEP:NRC:0773) onApril15,1983,anintermediate milestone responsewillbesumittedtotheNRCwiththecurrentstatusoftheDCRDRProgramonSeptember 1,1984.Atthattime,PhasesIandIIwillbeessentially completed, andanestimateforthePhaseIII-AAssessment willbedeveloped shortlythereafter.
TheNRCwillbeprovidedwithmoredetailedinformation regarding PhaseIII-AAssessment schedule(inanotherintermediate milestone response) whenthisestimatehasbeenmadeandtheevaluation ofitiscompleted.
4-3.CONTROLROOMHUMANENGINERING CRITERIAREPORTwAtthebeginning ofthereviewphase,apreliminary ControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReportwillbedeveloped.
Thispreliminary criteriareportwillcontain,asabaseline, detailedTaskPlanswhichwillbeexecutedtocompletespecificPhaseIIReviewTaskswithintheDCRDRProgram.TheTask6755B:I/0628834-1 Planshavebeenproveneffective onover20humanfactorscontrolroomreviews.TheTaskPlanswillprovideadetailedaudittrailtothegenericguidelines providedinNUREG0700,yethavebeenrestructured tofacilitate thedatacollection, documentation, andauditingrequirements inherentinaNUREG0700orientedDCRDRProgram.Basedonobservations andassessments oftheDCRDRProgram,thegenericguidelines ofNUREG0700foundinthepreliminary CRHECReportwillberevisedtoreflectplant-specific designconventions andplant-specific humanfactorscriteria.
AsectionofthefinalCRHECReportwillbededicated todepartures fromNUREG0700withtheapplicable justification providedtherein.ThefinalCRHECReportisintendedtoensurethatanyfuturecontrolboardmodifications reflectpreviously evaluated humanfactorspractices anddonotdetractfromoperability ofthecontrolboard.6755B:1/0628834-2 REVIEWOVERALLDCRDRPROGRAMOBJECTIVES EVALUATEOBJECTIVES
&DESIGNGUIDELINES TOBEUSEDIDENTIFYRESOURCES REQUIREDOUTLINEALLREVIEWTASKSTOBEPERFORMED ASPARTOFTHEDCRDRPROGRAMDEVELOPTHEDCRDRPROGRAMSCHEDULEISSUEPROGRAMPLANREPORT~ASSESSACTIVITIESCOMPLETED BYAEPSCANDl&MECo~EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES
,~DESIGNCRITERIAINCLUDING PLANTSPECIFICITEMS~NUREG066007000801~DEFINEPROGRAMSTHATHAVEANIMPACTONCONTROLROOMDESIGN(NUREG0696,REGULATORY GUIDE1.97)~DEFINERELATIONSHIP WITHOTHEREMERGENCY RESPONSEACTIVITY~PRELIMINARY CRHECREPORT~FINALSAFETYANALYSISREPORT~SYSTEMDESCRIPTIONS
~PIPINGANDINSTRUMENTATION DRAWINGS~FLOORPLANS~PANELLAYOUTS~ABBREVIATIONS ANDCODING'SOFTWAREDESCRIPTIONS
~PROCEDURES
~OPERATORTRAININGANDEXPERIENCE
~TASK1-OPERATING EXPFRIENCE REVIEW~TASK2'-SYSTEMFUNCTIONS REVIEWANDTASKANALYSIS~TASK3-CONTROLROOMINVENTORY
~TASK4-CONTROLROOMHUMANFACTORSURVEY~TASK5-VERIFICATION OFTASKPERFORMANCE
~TASK6-VALIDATION OFCONTROLROOMFUNCTIONS
~AEPSCANDl&MECoINPUTSTOSCHEDULE~REVIEWPROCESS~METHODOLOGY
~TEAMQUALIFICATIONS
~DESIGNGUIDELINES
~SCHEDULE~INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS OFPARTICIPANTS
~DOCUMENTATION ANDDOCUMENTCONTROLPRC.;APERTURE CAROFigure4-1.PlanningPhaseDevelopment OutlineI4-38401040i96~Q
]~>CQ7 19831984MAYJUNEJULYAUGSEPTOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNEJULYAUGSEPTOCTNOVDECJUNE27PLANNINGPHASEI~PLANNINGPPRToNRCPPRToNRCJAN1PHASEII-REVIEWTASK1LERREVIEWCROPSLERREVIEWSEPT1OCT1NOV1CROPSJAN2CROPSMAY22JUNE1TASK2SFRTATASK3CRITASK4CRHFSTASK5VERIFICATION TASK6VALIDATION PHASEIIIDETAILEDESTIMATION CRISEPT1OCTIMAR22JAN29MAR25iUNITNo.2)OUTAGECRHFSNOTE1JUNE30JULY14AUG15VERIF.SEPT1OCT6OCT20VALID.NOV1NOV22COMPLIESWITHSUPPLEMENT 1NUREG0737 PARAGRAPH 52.A"LICENSEES SHALLSUBMITPROGRAMPLANWITHINTWOMONTHSFROMSTARTOFDCRDR."~AEPSCANDINDIANAANDMICHIGANACTIVITY~~DCRDRREVIEWTEAMACTIVITYNOTE1CRHFSACTIVITIES MAYOCCURINPARALLELWITHCROPS.CRHFSSUMMARYREPORTDUEJUNE30,1984.Figure4-2.DCRDRProgramScheduleforPhasesIandII SECTION5DESCRIPTION OFPHASEII,REVIEW5-1.INTRODUCTION DuringtheReviewPhaseoftheD.C.CookDCRDRProgram,datawillbecollected andhumanfactorsissueswillbereviewed.
Thus,theobjective oftheReviewPhaseisthecollection ofdataidentifying attributes oftheD.C.CookUnits1and2controlroomswhichdepartfromcriteriaspecified intheD.C.CookControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport(paragraph 4-3).TheReviewPhasewillgenerate:
oTaskSummaryReportsforeachmajorreviewphasetaskspecifying methodsusedandfindings~Component sheetsspecifying thefindingsofeachtaskrelatedtoeachcomponent inthecontrolroom~Checklist observation formsdocumenting departures fromthehumanengineering criteriaestablished beforeandduringthereviewphase5-2.REVIEWPHASESTAFFINGTheReviewPhasewillbeconducted bytheDesignReviewTeam.Representatives ofI&MECo,AEPSC,Westinghouse, andCanyonResearchGroupwillbeincludedontheteam.Appropriate disciplines fromtheseorganizations willbeincludedoneachtaskteam.DesignReviewTeammembersinclude:~Systemdesigners andanalysts~Humanfactorsconsultants
~Controlboarddesigners 6755B:1/0628835-1
~Instrumentation andcontrolengineers
~Plantoperators
~Licensing engineers
~Datamanagement technicians
~Electrical engineers
~gualityassurance engineers 5-3.METHODOLOGY FORREVIEWPHASETASKSThemethodology fortheReviewPhasetaskswillconsistofexecuting TaskPlansandcompleting humanengineering surveysasreflected intheD.C.CookControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReport.5-4.Task1--0eratinExerienceReviewTheoperating experience reviewconsistsoftworelatedactivities.
Thefirstisareviewofplantperformance recordsforD.C.CookUnits1and2(andareviewofLERsforothersimilarplants)toidentifyareasinwhichhumanerrorhascausedproblemsinthepastthatmayberelatedtocontrolpaneldesign.ThesecondactivityistheControlRoomOperating Personnel Survey(CROPS).TheDesignReviewTeamwillinterview arepresentative sampleconsisting ofatleast50percentofthelicensedcontrolroomoperators atD.C.CookUnits1and2.Theobjective oftheCROPSistoidentifyspecificattributes oftheD.C.CookUnits1and2.controlboarddesignwhich,intheoperators'pinions, havecausedorcouldpotentially causeoperatorerror.TheCROPSwillbeconducted byadmini'stration ofquestionnaires andbyconducting individual andgroupinterviews.
6755B:1/0628835-2 5-5.Task2-SstemFunctionandTaskAnalsisTheSystemFunctionandTaskAnalysiswillestablish instrumentation requirements andperformance criteriaforselectnormalandemergency conditions.
Thistaskwillbeperformed byusingplant-specific procedures generated fromtheWestinghouse Owners'roup Emergency ResponseGuidelines.
Theseplant-specific procedures willbesubmitted totheDesignReviewTeam.ThisdatawillprovideinputtotheDesignReviewTeamfortheverification andvalidation ofcontrolroomfunctions (Tasks5and6).5-6.Task3-ControlRoomInventorThecontrolroominventory willbedeveloped onacomputerdatabaseandwillincludealldatarequiredbyNUREG0700foreachcomponent.
AEPSCwi11developandmaintaintheD.C.CookControlRoomInventory database.Formatsandcompleteness ofthedataitemlisthavebeenreviewedbyallreviewteammembersandcommentshavebeenincorporated toensurethattheinventory databasetosupportrelevantD.C.CookDCRDRProgramtaskscanbeaccepted.
5-7'.Task4-ControlRoomHumanFactorsSurveThebulkofthedetaileddataregarding specificdepartures fromtheControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaReportwillbegatheredintheControlRoomSurveysTask.TheControlRoomSurveysTaskwillbeconducted bycompleting 14humanengineering surveysasfollows:~Workspace eAnthropometrics
~Emergency equipment
~Heating,ventilating, andairconditioning
~Illumination 6755B:I/062883 5-3
~AmbientnoiseoMaintainabi 1ity~Communications
~Annunciator
~Controls~Displays~Labelsandlocationaids~Computersystemreview~Conventions DetailedTaskPlans,checklists, specialdatacollection forms,NUREG0700criteriareferences applicable toD.C.Cook,andmethodology descriptions foreachsurveywillbeincludedintheCRHECReport.TheAnnunciator SurveyTaskPlanisincludedinthisProgramPlanReportinappendixCasanexample.5-8.WorksaceSurve--Thissurveyconcentrates onthegenerallayoutandarrangement ofcontrolroomequipment.
Theworkspace surveywillalsoaddresstheadequacyofcontrolroomnoninstrumentation itemssuchasdesksandchairs.5-9.AnthroometricSurve--Theanthropometric surveywillassessanddocumentthevisionandreachenvelopes forallD.C.Cookcontrolroomequipment.
Thisdatawillbeevaluated forgeneralcontrolanddisplaylocationadequacybasedupontheCRHECReportanthropometric criteriaforthe5thpercentile femaleand95thpercentile male.Inaddition, theanthropo-metricdatawillbeusedtosupporttheverification andvalidation tasks.6755B:I/0628835-4 5-10.EmerencEuimentSurve-Emergency equipment willbeevaluated forusability bythecontrolroomoperators.
Includedwillbeanassessment ofemergency equipment storagelocations; operatoraccessability; tactile,visual,andauditoryadequacyofbreathing apparatus andprotective clothing; andothercriticalfeaturesofthecontrolroomemergency equipment.
5-11.HeatinVentilatinandAirConditionin Surve""Theailflow,temperature regulation, andhumiditycontrolwithinthecontrolroomwillbeevaluated intermsoftheCRHECReport.Theprimaryconcernistoidentifyparameters whichmaybeoutoftolerance orunstabletothepointofadv'ersely
,affecting therecommended comfortzonesforthecontrolroom.5-12.Illumination Surve-Ambientillumination willbemeasuredusingappropriate instruments forlightinglevelsatvariousworkstations andcontrolboardareas.Presenceofglare,ifany,oninstrumentation willbedocumented.
Illumination willbeevaluated forcompliance withrecommended andrequiredlightlevelsforidentified tasks.5-13.AmbientNoiseSurve--Ambientnoisewillbemeasur'ed usingappropriate soundmeasurement equipment.
Aprimaryconcernwillbethepeakandaveragedecibel(A) levelsandthepreferred octavebanddecibellevelsfortheambientnoiseconditions.
Thedatawillbereviewedforpotential soundproblemswhichmayinterfere withoperatorcommunication requirements orwhichmaymaskauditorysignals.5-14.Maintainabilit Surve--Themaintainability surveywillassesshumanfactorssuitability ofallequipment inthecontrolroom.Primaryconcernsarethattheoperators canmaintainindicator lights,determining ifannuncia" torsystembulbsarereplaceable, replenishing expendables suchasrecorderpaperandink,anddetermining thatsparepartsandexpendables areavailable andaccessable.
V5-15.Communications Surve--Thecontrolroomcommunication systemswillbereviewedandevaluated todetermine iftheyareadequatetosupportemergency andnormaloperations.
Systemssuchasthepagingsystem,intercom6755B:1/062883 5-5 system,-telephone system,sound-powered andportableradiocommunications equipment, andfree/air, unaidedvoicecommunications willbeincludedinthisreview.Auditorysignalswillalsobeevaluated forapplications, meaning,codingtechniques, signaltransmission/propagation, andsignalcharacteristics.
5-16.Annunciator SstemsReview--Theannunciator system,asaspecialcaseoflegendlightdisplaysandauditorysignals,willbeevaluated intermsofitsgeneralhumanengineering suitability andalsoasacriticalandcentralcontrolroomsystemusedintheidentification oftransient andemergency conditions.
Datacollected willbeanalyzedfordiscrepant characteristics whichmaypotentially increasetheprobability ofhumanerror.Also,relevantdatawillbeusedtosupporttheverification andvalidation tasks.engineering suitability withoutreference tospecifictasksupportive roles.Theprimarycriteriawillbethatcontained intheCRHECReportbasedonsection6.4ofNUREG0700.fgeneralhumanengineering suitability independently ofthespecifictasksinwhichthedisplaysareused.Theprimarycriteriawillbethatcontained intheCRHECReportbasedonSection6.5ofNUREG0700.5-19.LabelsandLocationAids-Thecontrolpanelsandinstrumentation willbesurveyedforgeneralreadability andconsistency ofterms,abbrevia-tions,andacronyms.
Datafromthistaskandtheconventions surveywillfurnishthebaselineinformation usedtoestablish astandarddictionary ofterms,abbreviations, andacronymsusedthroughout thecontrolroom.5-20.ComuterSstemReview--TheP-250processcomputersystemusedinthecontrolroomwillbeassessedforitsfunctional integration intotheoperational requirements ofthecontrolroom.Itwillalsobeevaluated forgeneralhumanfactorssuitability andforitssupportive roleincontrolroomoperation.
Thecritiera.
fromtheCRHECReport,basedonNUREG0700,Section6.7(processcomputers),
formsthebasisforthis=taskplan.6755B:I/062883 5-6 5-21.Conventions Surve-Thepurposeoftheconventions surveyisthreefold.
Thoseconventions usedatD.C.Cook,whethergeneralstereotypes, industryconventions, orplant-specific conventions, willbeidentified.
Second,theidentified conventions willbeevaluated forgoodhumanfactorscharacteristics, asdefinedinthecriteriafromtheCRHECReportbasedonsection6ofNUREG0700.Finally,anyinconsistencies intheapplications ofidentified conventions willbedocumented andtheirimpactassessed.
Datafromthistaskandthelabelingandlocationaidstaskwillbeusedtodevelopranddocumentastandarddictionary ofterms,abbreviations, andacronymsfortheD.C.Cookplants.5-22.Task5-Verification ofControlRoomFunctionAsoneofthetwoterminaltasksinthereviewphase,thepresenceandsuitability ofcontrolroominstrumentation willbeverified.
Theprimaryconcernwillbedetermining thatallrequiredinformation andcontrolcapabilities areinthecontrolroom.Asacorollary, thepresenceofnonessential information andcontrolinstrumentation willbeassessedtoensurethatitdoesnotdetractfromadequateoperatorperformance.
DatafromtheControlRoomInventory andthesystemsfunctionandtaskanalysisareextensively usedintheseactivities.
5-23.Task6--Validation ofControl.RoomFunctions Throughaprocessofwalkthroughs andtalkthroughs selectedemergency andnormaloperations willbevalidated fortheavailability ofrequiredskillsandknowledge ofthetrainedoperators.
5-24.PRODUCTSOFTHEREVIEWPHASETheprimaryoutputoftheReviewPhaseisasetofchecklist observation (CLO)forms.Eachdeparture fromestablished humanfactorscriteriaobservedduringtheReviewPhasewillbedocumented
~EachCLOformwillstatetheproblem,affectedcomponents, criteriaviolated, probableerror,andotherrelevantdatarequiredforanalysisoftheproblem.67558:I/062883 5-7 TheCLOswi11providetheprimaryinputtotheAssessment Phase,whereeachwillbecategorized according tosafetyand/oroperational impact.Inaddi-tion,atthecompletion oftheReviewPhase,component sheetfileswi11becomplete, andTaskSummaryReportsforeachtaskwillhavebeenprepared.
6755B:1/062883 5-8 SECTION6DESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-A,ASSESSMENT 6-1.INTRODUCTION Thereviewprocessdescribed insection5willresultintheidentification ofdepartures fromhumanengineering criteriadefinedintheCRHECReport.Analysisandinterpretation ofthesedepartures willberequiredtoestablish theirpotential safetyimplications.
Meansofcorrecting orminimizing theeffectsofthedepartures willbeidentified anddocumented.
Aplanofactionwillbeappliedtoimprovements affecting operatorperformance underemergency andselectednormaloperating conditions.
ThePhaseIIIactivities ofassessment andimplementation arecoveredinthissectionandsection7,following.
TheAssessment PhaseoftheDCRDRProgramwi11achievethefollowing objectives:
~Analyzeandevaluatetheobserveddepartures fromhumanengineering criteriaidentified duringthereviewphase~Recommend themeansofcorrecting thosedepartures whichcouldaffectsafetyorplant/operator performance-
~Defineaplanofactionwhichappliesthehumanfactorprinciples toimprovecontrolroomdesignandtoenhanceoperatoreffectiveness andefficiency
~Applytheassessment processtootherprojectsrelatedtothecontrolroomwhichareconcerned with,ormaybeaffectedby,thehumanfactorsreview(Regulatory Guide1.97,Revision2,safetyparameters displaysystem,procedures, training) 6755B:I/0628836-1 6-2.METHODOLOGY Theassessment processinvolvesthereviewandevaluation ofallCRHECReportdepartures identified bytheDesignReviewTeamduringPhaseIItodetermine whichdepartures canaffecttheoperator's performance suchthatthepotential foroperatorerorisincreased.
Thisprocessalsoinvolvesdetermining theextentofcorrections andjustifying anyrecommendations whichdonotcompletely correctthediscrepancies.
Alldepartures fromtheCRHECReportidentified duringtheReviewPhasewillbeprocessed according totheassessment methodology presented infigure6-1.Thesedepartures willbedocumented onchecklist observation formsandwillbeprovidedtotheAssessment Teamforanalysisandassessment.
Also,someoftheoperating personnel willbecanvassed usingthephotomosaic toresolveanyfactorswhichcouldcontribute toperformance problems.
TheAssessment TeamwillreviewtheCLOstodetermine theneedforreassess-mentbytheDesignReviewTeamortheiracceptance asHEDs.Thedisposition ofeachCLOwillbejustified and/ordocumented bytheAssessment Team.TheAssessment Teamwillevaluateandcategorize eachHEDaccording tothemetho-dologypresented infigure6-2.Thisapproachaccomplishes theassessment objectives ofNUREGs0700and0801.AllcategoryI,II,andIIIHEDswillbeanalyzedforcorrection asperfigure6-3.CategoryIVHEDs,considered optionalforcorrection, willbeassessedfortheircumulative andinteractive effectsonallotherHEDs.Thosecate-goryIVHEDsshowntopossesstheaboveeffectswillberecategorized totheappropriate categoryIIlevel.'ITheinitialstepinthisprocessistoidentifythoseHEDswhichcanbecor-rectedbyenhancements, trainingofoperators, and/orprocedural revisions.
Theremaining HEDswillbeanalyzedtoidentifyandprovidedesignimprovement alternatives.
Acost/benefit analysiswillbeperformed todetermine whichcorrections arethemostfeasibleandacceptable fromahumanengineering pointofview.Asapartofthereview,IEMECo/AEPSC willperformacost/benefitassessment forimplementation oftherecommendations.
6755B:1/0628836-2 Thecontrolroomreviewprocesswillbereapplied asappropriate toensurethefollowing:
~ThatthecreationofnewHEDsisidentified
~Thatothercorrections arenotinvalidated
~Compliance withhumanengineering guidelines developed duringPhaseIITheHEDsandfinalrecommendations forcorrection providedbytheassessment teamwillbesubmitted totheProjectReviewTeamforreviewanddisposition.
RejectedCLOsand/orrecommendations willbereturnedtotheAssessment Teamforadditional assessment.
6755B:I/062883 6-3 INTERFACE/
REASSESSDESIGNREVIEWTEAM~PERFORMSTHEREVIEW~PREPARESCHECKLIST OBSERVATION FORMS-LISTOFDEPARTURES FROMPRELIMINARY CONTROLROOMHUMANENGINEERINGCRITERIAREPORTCLOASSESSMENT TEAM~REVIEWCLOS~DETERMINE SIGNIFICANCE/
IMPACTASHUMANENGINEERING DISCREPANCIES (HEDS)~INTERFACE WITHDESIGNREVIEWTEAM~CATEGORIZE HEDS(REFERTOFIGURE6-3)~FINALRECOMMENDATIONS
~DEVELOPIMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULEHEDS(W/FINALRECOMMENDATIONS)
PROJECTREVIEWTEAMREASSESS/DISAPPROVE~REVIEW/COMMENT HEDSWITHFIMALRECOMMENDATIONS~INTERFACE WITHASSESSMENT TEAM~AEPSCGENERALPROCEDURE NO.25"ENGINEERING DESIGNCHANGES"Figure6-1.Assessment Methodology Chart6755B:1/0628836-5 DESIGNREVIEWTEAMCHECKLIST OBSERVATIONS FORMS(REASSESSMENT)
ASSESSMENT TEAMHUMANENGINEERING DISCREPANCIESEVALUATEFORSAFETYCONSEQUENCE YESNOYESHIGHPROBABILITY OFOPERATIONAL ERROR/SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION ASSESSFORSIGNIFICANTOPERATIONAL IMPACTSNONOYESCATEGORY2REFERTOFIGURE6-3CATEGORY3REFERTOFIGURE6-3NOSIGNIFICANTCOSTVERSUSOPERATORBENEFITCATEGORY1REFERTOFIGURE6-3IDENTIFYCORRECTIONSANDCOSTSTOFIXYESSELECTRECOMMENDED BACKFITQQc0oz5PeItASSESSFORNEWDEPARTURES FROMPRELIMINARY CRHECREPORTDOCUMENTANDPREPAREFORIMPLEMENTATION CATEGORY4DOCUMENTREFERTOFIGURE6-3Figuzq6-2.HumanEngineering Discrepancy Evaluation FlowChart 1I4-t'e+P)'.1 REVIEWPROCESSOBSERVATIONS HEDASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENT CRITERIACATEGORYIVASSESSMENT FACTORSAFETY(")CONSEQUENCES:
DOCUMENTED ERRORSINCREASED POTENTIAL FORERRORLOWPROBABILITY OFERRORNOTASSOCIATED WITHPROBABILITYOFERRORIMPLEMENTATION (RATING)EARLIESTOPPORTUNITY (MANDATOR Y)EARLIESTOPPORTUNITY (HIGHPRIORITY)
CONVENIENT OUTAGE(ACCEPTED)
MAYORMAYNOTBEREQUIRED(NOTMANDATORY)
HEDS(I,II,III)
(")EXAMPLE:RESULTSINUNSAFEOPERATION, VIOLATION OFTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CATIVRECOMMENDED CORRECTIONS NODOCUMENTYESANALYSISFORCORRECTION Figure6-3.HEDCategoryGuidelines 6755B:1/0628836-9
SECTION7OESCRIPTION OFPHASEIII-B,IMPLEMENTATION Approvedsolutions ofHEDsbytheProjectReviewTeamwillbescheduled forimplementation.
Thecategoryguidelines established insection6willbeusedasabasisforthecorrective actionschedule.
Additional considerations inthedevelopment oftheimplementation schedulewillbe:~Safetyconsequences ofoperatorerrorsthatcouldbecausedbythediscrepancy
~Integration withotherpost-TMIprograms~Plantoperation constraints oOperatortraining/retraining requirements
~Outageschedules oEquipment procurement schedules Thefollowing designations, identifed inNUREG0801,willbeadoptedforscheduling purposes:
theNRC.Makechangesatthefirstrefueling aftersubmittal ofthereportorthefirstoutageafterreceiptofequipment (expedited).
~Nearterm.CorrectproblemsonascheduleapprovedbytheNRC.Makechangesatthesecondrefueling outageaftersubmittal ofthereport.~Lontermotional.Corrections ofinsignificant discrepancies maybeimplemented atanytime.6755B:1/0628837-1
SECTION8.OESCRIPTION OFPHASEIV,REPORTING AProgramSummaryReportwillbepreparedinaccordance withNUREGs0700and0801uponcompletion oftheOCRORProgram.Thisreportwilldocumenttheoverallreviewprocess,describeandidentifyallofthehumanengineering discrepancies andfindings, andsummarize allDCRORactivities, methodologies, andproposedcontrolroomimprovements.
Thisreportwillalsoprovideanimplementation scheduleforplannedcorrective action.Thescheduleforplannedcorrective actionshallbebasedonrealistic andachievable dates.Theuseofintermediate milestones inplaceofenddatesmaybeusedifadditional relevantinformation isnotavailable atthetimetheProgramSummaryReportis.submitted totheNRC.Intermediate milestone dateswillbedetermined baseduponthedatebywhichnecessary additional information willbeknown,thuspermitting aninformeddetermination ofenddates.TheProgramSummaryReportwillupdatetheProgramPlanningReport.TheProgramSummaryReportwillbepreparedusingtherecommended formatshowninfigure8-1.Inadditiontothisfinalreport,supporting documentation willbeavailable forcompleteness intheeventofanNRCaudit.6755B:I/062883 8-1 II CONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWSUMMARYREPORT1.0METHODOLOGY 1.1DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramPlanObjectives 1.1.1DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewmethodology 1.1.2DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewprogrammanagement 1.1.3Proposedscheduleofthefourphasesofactivity(chart)1.1.4Integration ofotheremergency responseactivities ofNUREG0737,Supplement 11.1.5Qualityassurance program1.2Management andStaffing1.2.1Qualification ofDetailedContxolRoomDesignReviewpersonnel 1.2.2Organizational structure ofDCRDRReviewTeams1.3Documentation andDocumentControl.1.4ReviewPhase1.4.11.4.21.4.31.4.41.4.51.4.6Operating experience reviewSystemfunctions reviewandtaskanalysisControlroominventory ControlroomhumanfactorssurveyVerification oftaskperformance Validation ofcontrolroomfunctions 2.0REVIEWCONCERNS2.1ControlRoomHumanFactorSurveyConcerns2.1.1Workspace Survey2.1.2Anthropometrics Survey2.1.3Emergency Equipment Survey2.1.4Heating,Ventilation, andAirCondition Survey2.1.5Illumination Survey2.1.6AmbientNoiseSurvey-Figure8-1.SampleofProgramSummaryReportFormat(Sheet1)67558:1/062883 8-3
CONTROLROOMDESIGNREVIEWSUMMARYREPORT(cont)2.1.72.1.82.1.92.1.102.1.112.1.12Maintainability SurveyCommunication SurveyAnnunciator SystemsReviewControlsSurveyDisplaysSurveyLabelsandLocationAids2.1.13ComputerSystemReview2.1.14Conventions Survey2.2Panel/Work StationConcerns2.3SystemConcerns2.4OtherReviewConcerns3.0ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATION ANDIMPLEMENTATION PHASE3.1HEDAssessment 3.2ProposedImplementation 3.3Scheduled Implementation
4.0CONCLUSION
Figure8-1.SampleofProgramSummaryReportFormat(Sheet2)6755B:1/062883 8-5 SECTION9COORDINATION WITHNUREG0737,SUPPLEMENT 1,ACTIYITIES Theactivities tobecoordinated withtheDCRDRinaccordance withNUREG0737,Supplement 1,includethefollowing requirements forEmergency ResponseCapabilities:
SafetyParameter DisplaySystem(SPDS)UpgradeofEmergency Operating Prodecures (EOPs)Application toEmergency ResponseFacilities
-Regulatory Guide1.97Emergency ResponseFacilities (ERFs)IEMECowilladdresstheseactivities asreferenced inI&MECo'sresponsetoNRCGenericLetter82-33forD.C.CookUnits1and2;letterPAEP-NRC-0773, datedApril15,1983.Ascheduleofperformance andintegration oftheseotherpostTMIactivities withtheDCRDRisshowninFigure9-1.6755B:1/062883 C)(TlER(X7D.C.COOKPLANT-DCRDRCOORDINATION SCHEDULE1983198'985JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND SPDSHARDWARESOFTWAREINSTALLED
$7ATv5AVAILABLE RFm'~FORTRAININGOPERATIONAL WITHOPERATORTRAININGCOMPLETEDCRDRPPRTONRCINTERMEDIATE STATUSREPORTREVIEWPHASECOMPLETEFINALSUMMARYREPORTTONRCREG.GUIDE1.97EOPEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTS SPECIFIED
,STATUSPFFAk'7INTERMEDIATE STATUSREPORTPRGCEAlRE (jEN.PACk:QQG/hl0pzmvoqncRCrg~wlN8COMPLETEREVIEWREV.2IMPLEMENTED KEYTARGETCOMMITMENT Figure9-1.ScheduleofPerformance SECTjON10QUALITYASSURANCE TheOCRORProgramwillbeperformed inaccordance withAEPSCQualityAssurance ProgramfortheOonaldC.CookNuclear'lant, specifically AEPSCGeneralProcedure 2.1andotherapplicable generalprocedures asreferenced hereinandtheapplicable portionsofWestinghouse WCAP-8370 pertaining todocumentcontrolandauditability.
6755B:1/06288310-1 SECTION11SUMMARYThisProgramPlanReportdefinestheoverallprocessbywhichtheO.C.CookUnits1and2DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramwillbeperformed.
Itisaneffective andthoroughdesignreviewwhichwillensurethattheresultsofthiseffortmeettheintentofallapplicable government regulations andguidelines.
IndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyhascommitted theresources neededtoperformthedesignreviewasdetailedinthisdocument.
Therefore, theacceptability oftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewProgramwillbebasedontheapproval'f thisProgramPlanReport.TheIndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyCorporation reservestheright,however,tomakechangesandwillnotifytheNRCpriortotheexecution ofanyplanneddepartures.
Finalacceptance ofthisdocumentwillendthePlanningPhaseofthisprogram.6755B:1/062883 APPENDIXALISTOFABBREVIATIONS Thefollowing abbreviations applyonlytothisProgramPlanReportanddonotnecessarily applytoeffortsassociated withplantstandardabbreviations.
A/EAEPSCBOPCLOCRCRICROPSCRTDCRDRDRTEOPEPRIERGFSARHEHEDHFI8(CIKMECoINPOLELERMCBMWeMWtNRCNSSSOSDPCPMPPRArchitect/Engineer AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation BalanceofPlantChecklist Observation (form)ControlRoomControlRoomInventory ControlRoomOperating Personnel SurveyCathodeRayTubeDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewDesignReviewTeamEmergency Operating Procedures ElectricPowerResearchInstitute Emergency ResponseGuidelines FinalSafetyAnalysisReportHumanEngineering HumanEngineering Discrepancy HumanFactors-Instrumentation andControlIndianaandMichiganElectricPowerCompany(licensee)
Institute ofNuclearPowerOperators LeadEngineerLicenseeEventReportMainControlBoardMegawatt(electric)
Megawatt(thermal)
NuclearRegulatory Commission NuclearSteamSupplySystemOperational Sequences DiagramsPlantCoordinator ProgramManagerPreliminary PlanningReport6755B:1/062883 PRT-ProjectReviewTeamPSR-ProgramSummaryReportPWR-Pressurized WaterReactorSFTA-SystemsFunctionandTaskAnalysisSPDS-SafetyParameter DisplaySystemTMI-ThreeMileIslandWOG-Westinghouse Owner'sGroupCRHEC-ControlRoomHumanEngineering CriteriaTP-TaskPlanCRG-CanyonResearchGroupCRHFS-ControlRoomHumanFactorsSurvey6755B:I/062883A-2 APPENDIXBRESUMESOFKEYPERSONNEL 6755B:1/112983 B-l
RobertF.KroeerManagerofQualityAssurance Twentythreeyearsexperience inelectrical engineering, nuclearfuel,andqualityassurance involving majorpowergenerating anddistribution intheU.S.EDUCATION:
B.S.Electrical Engineering PurdueUniversity
-1960Additional Education:
-IndianaUniversity
-BusinessManagement 1960-62-GeneralElectricCo.PowerSystemsEngineering Course1967-1968
-AEPManagement Program-University ofMichigan-1980EXPERIENCE 1978'toPresentAmericanElectricPowerServiceCororation.ManaerofualitAssurance
-Responsibilities include:formulating andrecommending policiesandpractices withrespecttotheQAandQCprogramsforCookPlant;establishing effective QAandQCprogramsfortheCookPlant;insuringeffective implementation oftheestablished QAandQCprograms; providing guidanceandassistance toAEPSCandCookPlantmanagement onQAandQCrequirements andthenimplementation; monitoring ofcompliance withestablished QAprogramsthroughaudits,surveillance andreviews;andreporting toSeniormanagement andQAprogramseffectiveness.
Directtheday-to-day operation oftheAEPSCQADepartment including recommending thehiring,salaryadjustments, promotions, transfers, disciplining, andtermination ofpersonnel.
ContinueasSecretary oftheCCB.ElectedamemberoftheAEPSCNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee (Offsitereviewcommittee forCookPlant).1976to1978StaffEnineer,NuclearEnineerinDivision-Responsibilities includedpaiticipation innuclearfueldesignreviews,vendorevaluation, andinprocess surveillance andauditsofnuclearfuelfabrication.
Continued asSecretary oftheCCB.1973to1976StaffEnineer,ProjectManagement Division-Responsibilities includeddevelopment oftransmission anddistribution projectmanagement systemsandtechniques, methodsofmanpowerallocations, andmethodsforcostcontrol.Wasassignedtheresponsibility asSecretary oftheAEPSCChangeControlBoard(CCB)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.'Wasassignedtoa2persontaskactiongrouptodevelopcorporate projectmanagement andcontrolprocedures forananticipated, newhightemperature gascoolednuclearreactorproject.Receivedadditional specialassignments onCookPlantintheareasofcontrolofmodification, andtrackingofcommitments.
6755B:1/112983B-3 RobertF.Kroeer(Page2)1971to19731970to1971Administrative Assistant totheAEPSCViceChairman, EnineerinandConstruction
-Responsibilities werenumerousandwidelydiversified involving allfacetsofelectricutilityengineering, design,construction andoperation.
Assignedresponsibilities forcoordination ofnumerousspecialprojects,.
studiesandproblemsolvingtaskforces.Preparedresponses tooutsidecorrespondence foralllevelsofseniormanagement.
Developed andimplemented anAEPSCengineering manpowermonitoring programstocontinually monitorchangesinengineering manpowerandtechnical levelofengineering.
SeniorEnineer-Electrical EnineerinDivisionSecialAssinmenttoNuclearTaskForce-D.C.CookNuclearPlantElectrical Engineering DivisiongAprocedures, siteelectrical construction gAprocedures, electrical equipment specifications, originalcorporate wideseismicqualification specification, andelectrical equipment supplierqualification programs.
Conducted preawardauditsofandinprocess surveillance onsuppliers ofsafetyrelatedelectrical equipment.
Conducted numeroussiteauditsofelectrical construction activities.
1965to1970Enineervariousrades-Electrical EnineerinDivision-Distribution SectionNYOffice-Primaryresponsibility wasforlongrangeplanningofthedistribution systemsfortwooftheAEPsystemoperating companies, including improvement plans,loadforecasts, systemoptimization, costanalyses, coordination ofplanswithtransmission planninggroupsandpresentation ofplanstocorporate management forapproval.
Otherresponsibilities included:
administration (furtherdevelopment ofandimplementation oftheAEPsystemwidedistribution transformers loadmonitoryprogram(programtopredictonastatistical basisthemonthlyandannualpeakloadsonover400,000distribution transformers);
development andimplementation ofanAEPsystemsidedistribution systemtrouble,damageandinterruption reporting programtoprovidestatistical dataoncircuitandequipment "reliability" forplanningandequipment evaluation purposes; participated inataskforcetodevelopdistribution systemplanningguidelines; conducted numerousspecialstudiesondistribution systemequipment, construction standards andplanningcalculation techniques.
67558:1/1129838-4 1963to1965RobertF.Kroeer(Page3)Associate Enineer-CantonOhioEnineerinOivision-Primaryresponsibiljties werebasically thesameasthoseshownfor1965to1970.Th'ispositionwasestablished aspartofanefforttodevelopanAEPSCengineering groupinCanton,Ohio.Aftertwoyears,thedecisionwasmadetotransferthedistribution planningfunction,to theAEPSCNewYorkoffice.1960to1963Indiana5MichianElectricComoanAssistant Engineer-SstemEnineerinOffice,Oistribution Section-Primaryresponsibilities wereforshortrangedistribution systemplanning, development ofdetailedworkplansforimplementation ofdistribution systemimprovements, andspecialcustomerrelatedstudies.Additional responsibilities included:
evaluation ofsheetlightequipment, equipment utilization studiesandinstallation standards; continuous evaluation ofdistribution conductor connectsandassociated toolingandhardware.
67558:1/112983 8-5 RESUME:RobertC.CarruthTITLE:HeadElectrical Generation SectionAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation EDUCATION:
BachelorofEngineering 1965StevensInstitute ofTechnology MasterofEngineering
-ElectricPowerSystemsEngineering 1967Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute PRESENT:ManagerElectrical Generation SectionElectrical Engineering DivisionAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation 1979-1981 Assistant ManagerofElectrical Generation SectionElectrical Engineering DivisionAEPSC:Executeabroadrangeoftechnical andadministrative responsibilities insupervision of,anorganization of40engineers andsupporting technical personnel involvedinallaspectsofPowerPlantElectrical DesignEngineering, including powerequipment specification andapplication, auxiliary powersystemdesign,application ofprotective relayingandprotective interlocking
- circuits, designofrelayandsolidstatelogiccontrolsystems,application offaultdiagnostic equipment, performance ofequipment and,system failureanalysisandthemonitoring andupgrading ofinstalled andoperating electrical equipment andsystems.Specifictechnical andadministrative responsibilities include:Conducting JobPerformance Reviews.Administrative ofthetrainingandorientation programfornewtechnical personnel.
Manpowerplanningandmanpowerallocation.
Providing independent technical reviews.Participating inNuclearStandards Development.
Participating inNuclearSafetyDesignReviewSub-Committee activities.
Conducting specialstudiesinNuclearandFossilPlantDesign,construction andoperation relatedarea.Researchorconductevaluation ofsystemsorequipment misoperations, reportable occurrences, equipment
- failures, etc.Participate inNuclearPlantSiteAudits.6755B:1/112983 B-7 R.C.CarruthPage2PreviousNuclearExerience1972-1979 SeniorEngineer, andProjectElectrical EngineerforD.C.CookNuclearPlant;two1100MWWestinghouse PWR's.Responsible fortechnical andadministrative supervision ofanorganization ofsixtotenengineers andengineering supportpersonnel involvedinconstruction, qualification, licensing, pre-operational testing,startupandpostoperational engineering anddesignsupport.Specifictechnical andadministrati've responsibilities included:
Performing orsupervising hhedetaildesignofClassIEaswellasbalanceofplantelectrical systems,circuitsandcomponents.
Preparation ofEquipment qualification testprocedures.
Witnessacceptance testing.Supervise thepreparation ofplantsiteauditplans.Writeandsupervise thepreparation andexecution ofpre-operational testprocedures.
Supervise thedevelopment andtestingofClassIEcomponents.
Provideonsitestartuptechnical supportandsupervision.
DevelopanEngineering Procedures Manual.Establish procedures forengineering qualitycontrol.Institute anEngineering equalityAssurance Program.Assistintheestablishment ofaCorporate DesignChangeControlProcess.Performworkplanning; scheduling manpowerandassignments.
Personnel Performance Reviews.Supervise andprovidetechnical liaisontoaconsultant organization contracted tosupplement thepermanent staffassignedtotheProjectElectrical organization.
6755B:1/112983B-8 R.C.CarruthPage3GeneralIndustrExerience1977-1979 SeniorEngineerandSupervisory Engineerfortheelectrical designofRacineHydroelectric Project.Responsible forconceptual aswellasdetailengineering oftheelectrical systems,protectives, plantcontrols, dispatchautomation andsupervisory anddiagnostic systemsforremoteunattended operations Specificareasofactivityincluded:
Generation ofElectrical OneLines.Specification purchaseandapplication ofmajorelectrical systemsandhardwareincluding:
600Vand6.9kVswitchgear.
6.9kVIsolatedandNonSeg.Phasebus.Programmable controllers forcontrolanddispatchfunctions.
Equipment statusandalarmmonitoring system.Remotesupervisory anddataacquisition system.Batterycharger,inverterandUPSsystem.Parameter monitoring anddatamanagement system.Designof'lantcontrolsandprotective interlockingcircuitsandlogic.Development ofdispatchalgorithims foreconomicdispatchofthefacility.
Application ofgenerator andauxiliary powersystemprotective relaying.
Integration ofplantcontrolsandoperation withsubtransmission systemrelayingandswitching requirements.
Application ofstationoscillograph andplantsystemsstatusdiagnostic computerandannunciator systems.Application ofon-siteemergency dieselgeneration, andthedesignofautomatic loadshedding, restoration, re-transfer andtestingcircuitry.
6755B:1/112983B-9 R.C.CarruthPage41969-1972 EngineerandSponsor(ProjectElectrical)
Engineerfor.MitchellPlant-two800MWcoalfiredsuper-critical units:Responsible forelectrical controlandprotection, auxiliary powersystemsprotective
- relaying, relatedoperatortrainingandrelatedstartupandcommissioning supervision.
Specificresponsibilities andactivities included:
Designofelectrical controlandpowercircuits.
Application andsettingofprotective relays.Application ofswitchgear andotherswitching andprotective devices.Designofrelayanddigitalsolidstatelogicforplantcoalhandlingautomation.
Designofrelaycontrollogicandinterlocking forplantsystems.Preparation ofoperatorreference systemdescriptions andoperating instructions.
Prepareanddeliveroperatortrainingandorientation lecturesonkeyplantsystems.Writetestandcommissioning instructions.
Provideon-sitetechnical supporttoconstruction andrelaycheckoutpersonnel.
1968-1972 EngineerandProjectElectrical Engineerforthedesignandinstallation ofa345MVARsynchronous condenser installation aspartofa765kVEHVsystemexpansion.
Responsibilities included:
Designofallcontrolsandprotectives.
Designofauxiliary powersystem.Ratingmajorelectrical components.
Specification andpurchaseofcontrolcomponents, switchgear, transferswitches, auxiliary powerequipment, motorcontrolcenters,transformers.
Reviewandapprovalofallvendorsuppliedsystems,including excitation, generator coolingwatertreatment anddemineralizer systemequipment, andallstartingsystemequipment including generator startingandrunningbusswitching equipment.
6755B:1/112983B-10 R.C.CarruthPage51967"1969 Associate
- Engineer, Assisting ProjectElectrical Engineerinvariousaspectsofastripmineexpansion project,automated coalhaulage(railroad),
overlandconveyors, coalprocessing stationsandmisc.coalhandlingsystems.67558:1/112983 8"11
KARLJ.TOTHEDUCATION University ofSouthernCaliformia, M.A.,SystemManagement, 1968University ofOmaha,B.S.,MilitaryScience,1962CentralMichiganCollegeofEducation, 1950REGISTRATION Professional
- Engineer, StateofCalifornia EXPERIENCE AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation, 1983-PresentNUSCorpodation, 1980-1983U.S.AirForce,1951-1980MichiganSchoolSystem,1950-1951AMERICANELECTRICPOWERSERVICECORPORATION
-AssignedtotheNuclearSafetyandLicensing Sectionwithresponsibility forsafetyimplications ofallproposedD.C.CookNuclearPlantmodifications.
Reviewsallproposedchangesfor10CFR50.59 requirements andD.C.Cooklicensing commitments totheNRC.NUS-Asaconsulting engineerwiththeConsequence Assessment Department, isresponsible fortheanalysisofprobabilities andconsequences ofindustrial andtransportation accidents.
Conducted aircraftimpacthazardanalysisfortheSanOnofre,Skagit/Hanford, andHopeCreeknuclearpowerplantsandwroteSection3.5.1.6ofthepreliminary andfinalsafetyanalysisreports(PSARandFSAR)fortheHopeCreekplant.Performed analysisofprobabilities foraccidents
- injuries, anddeathsfortheenvironmental impactstatement foraway-from-reactor fuelreceiving andstoragestationsatNuclearFuelServices, WestValley,NewYork;GeneralElectric, Morris,Illinois, andAlliedGeneralNuclearServices,
- Barnwell, SouthCarolina.
Conducted riskanalyses, including possibleaccidents scenarios, onmilitarydeployment anduseofkrypton-85 advancedairfieldlightingsystems.Performed excavatioon planningandtimeestimates fortheGinnaNuclearPowerPlant.Conducted accidentandriskanalysesofremotelypilotedvehiclesfortheU.S.Department ofEnergy.Theseanalysesincludedpossibleaccidentscenarios, failuremodes,andprobabilities.
Inaddition, performed fieldsurveys,collected data,andmanagedprojectsforbothoffiteandonsitehazardsanalysisforcontrolroomhabitability forUnits1and2oftheSurry,Skagit/Hanford, andMidlandNuclearPowerPlants.Thisworkresultedinwritingrevisions toSection2.2oftheMidlandFSAR,which,includedanextensive studyandreport,andwritingSectionZ.ZoftheSkagit/Hanford PSARandtheHopeCreekFSAR~Participated intheIDCORAtomicIndustrial ForumonNuclearPowerPlantControlRoomOperatorHumanFactorsStudy.6755B:1/112983B-13 KARLJ.TOTHPage2U.S.AIRFORCE-Servedaspilotandinprogressive management positions inboththeoperations andsafetyfunctions.
Attermination ofAirForcecareer,wasChiefofSafetyforAirForceSystemsCommand,withresponsibility forsystemsafety,reliability, maintainability, andoverallproductassurance forapproximately 90percentofthehardwareandsoftwarepurchased bytheU.S.AirForce.From1974through1977,wasresponsible forreviewing andapproving evacuation plansandcontrolcenteroperations for20installations intheeasternUnitedStates.Hashadextensive experience workingwithanddirecting postaccidents radiation-monitoring teams,decontamination teams,andaccidentinvestigations.
AsChiefofSafetyandDisasterControl,from1962to1974,conducted evacuation studiesatsixnuclearinstallations; oneinJapan,twoinEurope,andthreeintheUnitedStates.Studiesincludedtimeestimates, routes,methods,andprocedures fordispersing personnel andcriticaldefenseequipment.
Responsibilities alsoincludedestablishing anddirecting emergency controlcenterprocedures andoperations ateachlocation.
Investigated acatastrophic bomberaircraftcrashinJapanwhichresultedinmanyunnecessary civiliancasualties.
Theselosseswereattributed toalackofknowledge bythelocalpopulation.
Asaresult,developed, andtranslated, anddistributed emergency procedures checklists forlocalofficials.
Alsowroteanexplanation ofthehazardsandrisksandestablished simpleprocedures tobefollowedintheeventoffutureaccidents.
Theseprocedures weretranslated andpublished inlocalpapersandbroadcast periodically onlocalradioandtelevision.
Thesechecklists andnewsmediareleaseswerewellreceivedandsubsequently translated andsuccessfully usedatlocations inEuropeandintheUnitedStates.MEMBERSHIPS AmericanDefensePreparedness Association AmericanNuclearSocietyCertified HazardControlManagerInternational SocietyofAirSafetyInvestigators NationalAerospace Education Association NationalSocietyofProfessional Engineers SystemSafetySociety6755B:1/1129838-14 ARTHURS.GRZMESConsultin Mechanical EnineerThirtyfiveyearsexperience inmechanical engineering activities involving majorpowergenerating facilities intheUnitedStatesandZsrael.EDUCATZON:
Pzofessional degreeinMechanical Engineering University ofCincinnati, 1948Additional Education:
BusinessAdministration, AdelphiUniversity 1955Automatic Control,University ofMichigan1954EXPERZENCE:
1978toPresentAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorConsulting Mechanical Engineer-Consultant tomechanical engineering andotherdisciplines inareasofautomatic control,plantoperation andthermalperformance.
Performnuclearplantaudits.Consultonresearchprojects.
1972-77Assistant DivisionManager-Mechanical Engineering Responsible formechanical engineering activities inplantmodification andoperation ofanuclearpowerplant.1955-72Manager,ResultsSection-Responsible fordesignandpurchaseofinstrumentation andcontrolsystems,steamcycleanalysis, andpezformancetestingofpowergenerating plants.Plantsincludedcoal,oil,nuclearandhydro.1950-551948-49Engineer-Responsible fordesignandpurchaseofinstrumentation andcontrolsystemsforfossilpowerplants.AalachianPowerCo.,Loan,WestViriniaResultsEngineerresponsible formaintenance ofinstruments andcontrolsandforperformance testingincoalfiredpowerplant.PROFESSZONAL AFFZLZATZON:
Fellow,AmericanSocietyofMechanical Engineers Chapter8,PumpHandbook-McGraw-Hill 1976Operating Experience WithTheCardinalPlantTrainingSimulator
-AmericanNuclearSociety1970ServiceExperience WithAnalogComputers ForUtilityPowerPlants-AmericanPowerConf.1962 CMeasurement ofDensityandMoistureinaLargeCoalStoragePile-AmericanPowerConf.1961Application ofanAutomatic DigitalDataCollecting SystemToThePhiloSupercritical Unit,AmericanPowerConf.1958ThermalPerformance OfThePhiloSupercritical Unit-AmericanSocietyofMechanical Engineers, 1958PATENTS:4,343,682 Feedwater HeatingMeansforNuclearUnitsDuringStart-upandMethodofControlling Same.3,721,898, Apparatus forDetecting LeakageFromorRuptureofPipesandOtherVesselsContaining FluidUnderPressure.
3,211,135 SteamGenerator UnitContxolSystem SummaryResumeofTHOMASB.SHERIDANThomasB.SheridanattendedPurdueUniversity (B.S.1951)and,aftertwoyearsinmilitaryservice(Aeromedical Laboratory, WrightPatterson AirForceBase,Ohio)attendedtheUniversity ofCalifornia, LosAngeles(M.S.1954)andM.I.T.(Sc.D.1959).Hisdoctoralprogramwasinterdepartmental between'systemsengineering andpsychology, withoneyearspentincross-registration atHarvardUniversity.
Formostofhiscareer,Or.SheridanhasremainedatM.I.T.,whereuntilrecentlyhewasProfessor ofMechanical Engineering andisnowProfessor ofEngineering andAppliedPsychology.
HeheadstheMan-Machine'Systems Laboratory andteachesbothgraduateandundergraduate subjectsinMan-Machine Systems.HeisaFacultyAssociate oftheM.I.T.Science,Technology andSocietyProgram.Hehelpeddevelopanewinterdepartmental graduatedegreeprograminTechnology andPolicy,and.hastaughtthecoreseminarsforthatprogram.Hehasalsotaughtcontrol,designandotherengineering subjects.
HehasservedasvisitingfacultymemberattheUniversity ofCalifornia,
- Berkeley, StanfordUniversity, andtheTechnical University ofDelft,Netherlands.
NDr.Sheridan's researchhasbeenonmathematical modelsofhumanoperatorandsocio"economic systems,onman-computer interaction inpilotingaircraftandinsupervising underseaandindustrial roboticsystems,andoncomputergraphictechnology forinformation searching andgroupdeicision-making.
Heisauthor,withW.R.Ferrell,ofMan-Machine Sstems:Information, ControlandDecisionModelsofHumanPerformance, M.I.T.Press,1974,1981(published inRussian,1980)andco-editor ofa1976PlenumPressbook,M~onitorin BehaviorandSuervisorControl.HeisafellowoftheInstitute ofElectrical andElectronics Engineers, wasformerlyeditoroftheIEEETransactions onMan-Machine Sstems,ispastpresident ofthe'EEESystems,ManandCybernetics Society,servedasChairmanoftheIEEECommittee onTechnology Forecasting andAssessment andwaschairmanofthe1981IEEEWorkshoponHumanFactorsinNuclearSafety.HeisalsoaFellowoftheHumanFactorsSociety,andin1977receivedthe'irPaulM.FittsAwardforcontributions toeducation.
HeisAssociate EditorofAutomatica andontheEditorial AdvisoryBoardofComuterAidedDesin.Dr.SheridanhasservedontheAccidentPrevention andInjuryControlStudySectionsoftheNationalInstitutes ofHealth,theNASALifeSciencesAdvisoryCommittee, theNSFAutomation ResearchCouncil,theNASAStudygrouponRobotics, theU.S.CongressOTATaskForceonAppropriate Technology, andtheNSFAdvisoryCommittee onAppliedPhysical, Mathematical andBiological FactorsandservedontheNRCAdHocCommittee onAircrew-Vehicle Interaction andtwoadvisorypanelsoftheNRCMarineBoard.Hisindustrial consulting activities haveincluded:
TheGeneralMotorsCorp.(autosafety);GeneralElectricCo.(telemanipulator s);C.S.DraperLaboratory 6755B:1/112983B-17 ThomasB.SheridanPage2(designofastronaut interface forApolloguidancesystem,industrial robots);Biodynamics, Inc.(biomedical andhumanfactors);
PublicBroadcast Service(TVaudiencefeedback);
NationalBureauofStandards (industrial robots);GroupDialogSystems,Inc.(groupmeetinganddecisiontechnology);
NorthropAircarft(pilotworkload);
BabcockandWilcoxCo.(industrial instrumenta-tions);Lockheed, GeneralPhysics,AmericanElectricPower,Consumer's andWebster,theBWROwners'roup, Brookhaven NationalLaboratory, YankeeAtomic,andElectricPowerResearchInstitute.(man-machine aspectsofnuclearplantsafety).67558:1/112983 8-18 Manaer,Instrumentation andControlSectionSeventeen yearsexperience ininstrumentation, controlandequipment protection activities involving majorpowergenerating anddistribution facilities intheUnitedStates..EDUCATION:
B.S.Electrical Engineering, IllinoisInstitute ofTechnology, 1966REGISTRATION:
EXPERiENCE:
1977toPresent1976to1977Additional Education:
AEPManagement Course-University ofMichigan, 1979Professional Engineer-California (1977)AmericanElectricPowerServiceCororationManager,Instrumentation
&ControlSection-Responsibilities includesupervising thedevelopment oftheoverallplantcontrolphilosophy.
Review,approveandrecommendations ofinstruments, controls&computersuppliedwithallmajormechanical equipment.
Organizethedevelopment ofsoftware, selection ofhardwareforpowerplantprocesscomputers.
Supervise thearrangement ofcontrolrooms,simulators andpanelsincorporating humanfactorconsiderations.
Assuredocumentation ofinstru-mentation, controlandcomputerstrategies viatheEngineering ControlProcedure (ECP)packages.
Carryouttheinterface betweenMechanical andElectrical Engineering forControlDesignandEngineering.
Provideforprofes-sionaldevelopment andtrainingofSectionpersonnel.
Recommend hiring,salaryadjustments, promotion, transfers andreleaseofpersonnel.
ProjectworkincludesMontaineer Unit1andRockportUnits1&21300mwfossilfiredpowerplants,CookNuclearPlantUnits1&2upgrades, thePressurized Fluidized BedCombustion ProjectStudies,andanewseriesofFossilFiredPlantstudiesin-plantmonitoring computers forStackEnvironmental Data.Assistant SectionHead/Instrumentation
&ControlSection-Responsibilities includedsupervision, instrument andcontrolwork,training, evaluating personnel performance, reviewandapprovalofpurchaseorders,standards anddrawings, supervise thearrangement anddesignofcontrolpanels,supervise anddesignofcontrolsystems,coordinate thepreparation ofboiler&turbineinterlock diagramsandanalyzing thepowerplantcycleandtheircontrols.
Projectworkincludedaseriesof1300MMFossilFiredPowerPlants,D.C'.CookNuclearPlantUnit1&2andaMechanical Engineering DivisionPowerPlantCycleStudy.67558:1/112983 8-19 JohnC.JeffreyPage21975to1976Engineer, Instrumentation
&ControlSection,N.Y.Office-"Responsibilities includeddesignofcontrolsystems,selection ofinstruments andcontroldevices,preparation ofspecifications, reviewofconstruction
- drawings, inspection ofnewfacilities, preparecalibrated andoperation instructions andmakedynamicresponsestudies.ProjectworkincludedtheCookPlantWasteEvaporator andWasteEvaporator BottomsSystems,RequestForChangeSheet,LotandUnitP2replacement equipment.
1974to19751972to1974Engineer, Instrumentation
&ControlSectionatCookPlant-Responsibilities includedsupervision oftheNERVEorganization asoutlinedbelowplusassisting theCookPlantwithstaffprocedures, audits,testsandtraining.
Indiana&MichianElectricComtianSupervising
- Engineer, GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atCookPlant-Responsibilities includedsupervision,
- engineer, design,construction, maintenance andoperation ofstation&plantfacilities, supervise installation
&maintenance andofstationandplantequipment, formulate policiesandprocedures, supervise specialstudiesandreports,assistinplanningandengineering newstations, supervise repairing equipment inconnection withfailure.Responsible foremployment, promotion,
- transfer, discipline anddischarge.
Projectsincludedallelectrical controlsandD.C.CookNuclearPlant.1971to1972SeniorEngineer, GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atCookPlant-Responsibilities includedperforming anddirecting othersintesting,adjusting stationandplantequipment, reviewing construction printstoassurethattheyareconsistent withintendedfunction, inspect&coordinate theworkofcontractors, makerecommendations tocorrectmalfunctions, planandperformspecialtests,analyzetestresults,prepareestimates, reportsandstudies.Projectsincludedallelectrical controlsatD.C.CookNuclearPlant.1970to1971SeniorEngineer.,
GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atNewYorkOffice-Responsibilities includedparticipating inthedesignandengineering ofD.C.CookNuclearPlant.Projectsincludeddieselloadanalysis, safeguard pumpcontrol,essential servicewater,sewagedisposal, auxiliary feedwater,controlair,black"out sequencing, component coolingwaterthe345/765stationandthe69/4KVemergency powerstation.6755B:1/112983 8;20 JohnC.JeffreyPage31969to19701969to1969Engineer, GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atMichiganPowerCompany-Responsibilities includedMaintenance andPerformance TestsofStationandHydroequipment suchascircuitbreakers, transformers, relaysandprotective equipment.
Iwasresponsible forinspection ofstationconstruction projectsandcoordinating contractor's workandtraining.
Projectsincludedtwo69KVtransmission anddistribution stationandConstatine and'Mottville Hydroelectricplants.Engineer, GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atBigSandyPlant-Responsibilities includedperforming testsofPlantEquipment suchascircuitbreakers, heaters,transformers, pumps,valves,relays,protective equipment andtraining.
Projectsincludecirculating water,coolingtowers,trans-formers,pulverizers, generator, unitcircuitbreakersandthe765KVstationequipment.
1968to1969Engineer,
'GeneralOffice,StationDepartment atMichiganPowerCompany-Responsibilities includedmaintaining andperforming testsofstationequipment, suchascircuitbreakers, transformers, relaysandprotective equipment.
Iwasresponsible forinspection ofstationconstruction projectsandcoordinating contractors work,design,economicjustification ofnewstationcontrolandtraining.
Projectsincludedinspection, testing,repairandpartialredesignofControlatallMichiganPowerTransmission Stations.
Thecontroldesign&economicjustification, testing,calibration andplacinginserviceofa69/34KVtransmission stationSchoolCraftSouth.1966to1968Engineer, GeneralOffice,.StationDepartment atIndianaandMichiganElectricCo.-Responsibilities includedrunningspecialequipment test,performing testingofstationequipment suchascircuitbreakers, transformers, relaysandprotective equipment, carriercurrentandsupervisory control.Iwasresponsible forinspecton ofstationconstruction projectsandcoordinating contractor's workfortrainingandtrainingequipment, forcalibration andtimingstudies,calibration recordsystemandcalibration aids.Projectsincludedtestingofsolidstaterelays,testingshockpreventative devices,designandconstruction ofatrainingsimulator, development ofacalibration record,calibration charts,stationcalculations, timingcoordination studies,installation of345KVcircuitbreakersatTannersCreekPlant.Stationremovalandinstallation of345KVcircuitbreakersatBreekPlantStation.6755B:1/112983B-21
'\/A0 RexfordF.Shoemaker SeniorEnineer,Instrumentation
&ControlSectionTwenty-one yearsexperience ininstrumentation, controlandprotective systemsactivities infossilfuelpowergeneration stations.
EDUCATION:
B.S.Mechanical Engineering WestVirginiaInstitute ofTechnology, 1961EXPERIENCE:
1972to1983Apalachian PowerComanPlantPerformance Superintendent, JohnE.AmosPlant-Responsibilities includedallplantinstrumentation, controlandprotective systems,cyclechemistry andcontrol,environmental controlsandthermalperformance andtesting.Supervise eighty(80)technical andsupervisory personnel.
Wrotefirst1300MWIntegrated UnitControlSystemlineupandcalibration procedure.
Alternate weekendcall-outdutieswithOperation Department Superintendent, supervise unitstart-ups andoperations Wrotefirst1300MWunitnormalcoldstart-upprocedure.
1970to1972Performance Supervising Engineer"Responsibilities includedsupervising technicians andengineers incheck-out, calibration andstart-upactivities ofAmosplantinstrumentation andcontrolssystemsontwo800MWandone1300MWcoalfiredsupercritical pressureunits.1969to1970Performance EngineerSenior,ontemporary assignment toAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation, Instrumentation 6ControlSectioninNewYorkCity-Responsibilities includedhelpingtoassemblecalibration booksforAmosUnits1and2.Reviseasrequiredforautomatic controlBigSandyUnit2Integrated UnitControlSystem.Developfirst800MWIntegrated UnitControlSystemcalibration andlineupdrawings.
HelpwithMitchellUnitOneWestinghouse-Hagan factorycheckoutofIntegrated UnitControlSystemCabinets.
1968to1969Performance
- Engineer, KanawhaRiverPlant-Responsibilities includedsupervising instrument andcontroltechnician crew.6755B:1/112983 B-23 RexfordF.Shoemaker Page21966to19671961to1966BaileMeterComanSystemsEngineer, Wickliffe, Ohio-Responsibilities includeddes'ign,specify,documentstandardcontrolsystemlogicforcentralstationapplications.
Troubleshootlargeelectronic controlsystemsonsupercritical unitsandreviseasnecessary tohelpdevelopcompanystandards.
Helpdesign,assemble, check-out andputintoservicefirstclosedloopanalogsimulator forfactorycheckoutoflargeelec'tronic controlsystemsforsupercritical units.FieldServiceEngineer, Cincinnati, Ohio-Responsibilities includedserviceandmaintainexistingcontrolsystemspluscheckoutandstart-upnewcontrolsystemsrangingfromsmallpneumatic onindustrial drumboilersandprocesses tolargeelectronic oncentralstationunits.6755B:1/1129838"24 FrankS.VanPelt,Jr.Professional Engineer-MichiganSectionManager-Construction ProjectManagement IIIAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorp.BachelorofScience-Mechanical Engineering VirginiaPolytechnic Institute andStateUniversity June,1982-Present-AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorp.SectionManagerforCookPlantProjectManagement IIIPlanningandScheduling RFCworkforCookPlant.March,1980-May,1982-AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorpSectionManager-PlanningandScheduling; ProjectControls.
Coordinated CookPlantFSARUpdate;begandevelopment ofdetaillogicnetworksforCoalFiredPowerPlantConstruction program.HeadedoneofthreeteamsduringStudyprogramfornewcoalfiredpowerplant.July,1979-'ebruary, 1980-AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorp.ProjectControl-Engineer-Construction Projects.
Beganthedevelopment ofcomputerprogramforscheduling theengineering, designandconstruction ofacoalfiredpowerplant.April,1978-June,1979-AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorp.ProjectManagerassignedtoHeliumBreederAssociates, SanDiego,California.
Assistedinthedevelopment oftheManagement SystemandprogramtobeusedfortheGasCooledFastBreederReactorProgram.May,1977-March,1978-I&MElectricCo.-D.C.CookPlantLeadStart-upEngineerDirectedsixStart-UpEngineers inthecompletion andstart-upofUnit2'ntCookPlant.Maintained thePreopscheduleandassuredtimelyreleaseofsystemsforPreopTesting..
August,1972-April,1977-I&MElectricCo.-D.C.CookPlantStart-UpEngineer/Assistant LeadStart-upEngineerCoordinated thecompletion andstart-upofassignedsystemsforbothUnit1and2.Preparedsysteminitialoperating procedures, flushingprocedures andhydrostatic testprocedures.
6755B:1/112983B-25 FrankS.VanPelt,Jr.Page2June,1970-July,1972-CentralOperating Co.-PhilipSpornPlantPerformance EngineerPlanned,set-upequipment, tookdata,calculated andanalyzedtheresultsandmaderecommendations forequipment performance improvements formyassignedunits.67558:1/112983 8-26 JamesB.BrittanSeniorEnineer,ualitAssurance Morethantwentyyearsexperience invariousgualityAssurance andReliability activities including sevenyearswithnuclearpowergeneration facilities.
EDUCATION:
B.S.inMarineEngineering, NYStateMaritime1954GraduateStudiesinNuclearEngineering, UCLAMBA,CWPost,'Div.
LIU.EXPERIENCE:
1977toAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation Responsible forestablishment andimplementation ofcompletesupplierqualification programforallcompanies furnishing equipmeat orservicesimportant tonuclearsafetytoAEP(morethanfourhundreddiverseorganizations).
Responsible forauditortrainingandcertification program.Responsible forplanning, scheduling andimplementation ofinternalgualityAssurance auditprogram.ProjectgArepresentative onspentfuelrackmodification andPlantsecuritysystemprojects.
1962-1976 LundElectronics 8Sstem,Inc.gualityAssurance Manager,responsible forqualityplanning, reliability, qualityplanning, qualityengineerng, qualitycontrolandalltestingassociated withthecompany's diverselineofelectromechanical products.
Directedenvironmental lab,modelshop,electronic lab,andmetrology functions.
Managedbudgets,testprogramcontracts, otherplanning8scheduling functions.
Wroteproposals, testplansandreports.6755B:I/112983B-27 LouisP.DeMarcoEXPERIENCE:
6/73-PresentEngineering Assistant Electrical Generation SectionElectrical Engineering DivisionRESPONSIBILITIES:
4/79-PresentResponsible forSystemEngineering functions suchas:Evaluating andimplementing allphasesofdesignmodifications fortwo1100MWnuclearunits,including Radiation Monitoring System,ReactorProtection System,HydrogenMitigation Distributed IgnitionSystem,FireProtection Systems,variousplantsystemsandtheirsupport.Provideplantstaffwithelectrical engipeering support.Investigate andprepareresponses inconnection withNuclearRegulatory Commission circulars andbulletins.
Coordinate Plant'Annunciator ResponseProcedure Review.TaskforcememberforOnsiteLowLevelRadiation WasteStorageFacility.
3/76-4/79(}ualityControlEngineerresponsible formanagingandimplementing thequalitycontrolsystemfornuclearplantengineering designmodifications, including reviewofallelectrical engineering des'ignmodifications fortechnical andprocedural completeness.
6/73-3/76Technical Assistant, assisting bothfossilandnuclearengineering staffby:performing engineering calculations, datatabulations, equipment specifications, purchaseandexpediting.
EDUCATION:
Polytechnic Institute ofNewYork110creditscompleted towardB.S.E.E.StatenIslandCommunity CollegeA.S.S.Degree-1973Electro-Mechanical Technology 6755B:1/1129838-29 ftJ ThaddeusRussellStephensCitizenshi U.S.(Born-Niles,Michigan)
PositionTitleSeniorPerformance EngineerPresentEmloerIndianaandMichiganElectricCo'mpanyDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantEducation November1980:AttendedCombustion Engineering's two-weekSimulator TrainingProgramandcompleted thereactorstartupexamination satisfactorily.
April1980:University ofMichigan, AnnArbor,Michigan.
Successfully completed thetwo-weekReactorOperatorTrainingProgramatFordNuclearReactor/Phoenix MemorialLaboratory.
March1978:Asixteen-hour courseonvibration analysisgivenbytheIRDCompany.(June-August1976:AmericanElectricPower'sPerformance Improvement Programconsisted of240hoursofbothclassroom lecturesonpowerplantrelatedsubjectsandperformance testingof1300megawattcoalfiredunitwithrelatedequipment andcalculations oftestdata.March1975:Aforty-hour recorderandcontrolsmaintenance coursegivenbytheLeeds8NorthrupCompany.1974:Graduated, Tri-State College,Angola,Indiana,BachelorofScienceinMechanical Engineering.
Attendeda40-hourManagement TrainingCoursegivenbytheIndiana4MichiganElectricCompany.6755B:1/112983B-31 T.R.StephensPage2Setember1979toPresent:SeniorPerformance EngineerassignedtotheOperations Department attheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.DutiesincludethereviewandrevisionoftheOperations Department Procedures andgeneraltechnical supportfortheDepartment.
Auust1976toSeptember 1979:SeniorPerformance EngineeratTannersCreek,havingthedutiestosupervise thePerformance Engineers whohaveunitresponsibility, toscheduletestworkandassignandmonitorprojectwork.November1974toAuust1976:WorkedasaPerformance Engineerina1050megawattgenerating stationwhichhasfourcoal-fi,red units.ThestationistheTannerysCreekStationownedbytheIndiana5MichiganElectricCompany,asubsidiary ofAmericanElectricPowerCompany.Mydutiesincludedtestingofmajorunitequipment, assortedprojectwork,andthemaintaining oftheunit'scontrolsystems.March1974toNovember1974:Workedasafirstlinesupervisor ofaforgelineandweldinglineinthemanufacture ofsinglepieceaxlehousingsintheHousingDivisionofClarkEquipment Company.Lefttogetworkmoreinlinewithmyprofessional training.
June1968toMarch1974:Co-opstudentwithClarkEquipment CompanyinBuchanan, Michigan.
6755B:1/112983B-32 JOHND.YOUNG-SeniorEngineer, Electrical PowerSystems/Control BoardDesign,Westinghouse ElectricCorporation Education:
-B.S.inElectrical Engineering fromTri-State College~EMr.YoungiswithWestinghouse ElectricCorporation intheInstrumentation andControlDepartment, Electrical PowerSystemsandControlBoardDesigngroup.Hisworkexperience forthepasttenyearshasbeenintheareaofmaincont'rolandpanellayout.design.HeistheleadengineerfortheControlBoardDesigngroup.Mr.Youngwastheresponsible designengineerforthecontrolboardsforthefollowing nuclearpowerplants:a)SequoyahUnits1and2b)WattsBarUnits1and2c)KrskoUnit1(Yugoslavia) d)NapotPointUnit1(Philippines)
Hewasalsotheresponsible engineerinthedesignofamodularoperation consolewhichcanintegrate therequirements ofReg.Guide1.97andNUREG0696intoexistingcontrolrooms.Mr.Youngalsohasoverthreeyearsexperience withthereactorprotection andsafeguards systemspanels.Hewasinstrumental inthedesignofthesafeguards on-linetestingsysem.Mr.Young'sexperience inthenuclearindustryspansfourteenandone-halfyearswithWestinghouse intheInstrumentation andControlfield.6755B:1/112983B"33 WAYNER.YOUNG-Engineer, Electrical PowerSystemsandControlBoardDesignEducation:
-A.S.inElectronics Technology fromtheCommunity CollegeofAllegheny County-Continuing towardsaB.S.inElectrical Engineering fromtheUniversity ofPittsburgh Exerience:Mr.YoungiswiththeWestinghouse ElectricCorporation intheInstrumentation andControlDepartment, Electrical PowerSystemsandControlBoardDesignGroup.Hisworkexperience hasbeenintheareaofmaincontrolboard/panel layoutanddesign.Histotalnuclearexperience spansnineyearsofservicewithWestinghouse intheinstrumentation andcontrolfield.Heisthecognizant engineerforthehumanengineering evaluation fortheLouisiana PowerandLightWaterford 3nuclearplant,aprogramwhichincludedthefollowing.
a)Assessthelayoutandadequacyofthemaincontrolboard(MCB)requiredtosupportoperating crewactivities throughtheuseofplant-specific Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs).b)VerifythattheEOPsequenceofstepsandprocedural flowarecompatible withtheMCBlayout.c)ConductEOPverification walk-throughs intheWaterford 3controlroom.d)=Providerecommendations forresolution ofHumanEngineering Discrepancies (HEDs).e)Assistinthedevelopment ofplantspecific, symptom-based, eventscenarios foruseintheEOPverification.
6755B:1/062883B-35 WAYNER.YOUNG(continued) f)Assistinthepreparation oftheeventrecognition report,MCRdisplaymaps,taskmaps,andlinkanalysisdocumentation.
Mr.Youngisalsoresponsible forthemaincontrolboardequipment qualification program.Dutiesforequipment qualified toIEE323"1974and344-1975include:a)Participation inthepreparation ofequipment qualification reports.b)Generation andmaintenance ofbaselinedesigndocuments.
c)Generation andmaintenance ofcomputerized specifications.
d)Equipment quotations.
e)Equipment procurement.
f)Maintenance ofqualification filsforauditability.Additionally, Mr.YoungisthesystemsengineerfortheNuclearSteamSupplySystem(NSSS)onthefollowing powerplants:a)ComanchePeakUnits¹1and¹2b)McGuireUnits¹1and¹2c)CatawbaUnits¹1and¹2d)MannshanUnits¹1and¹2e)KoreaUnit¹2f)Millstone Unit¹2g)VirgilC.Summerh)BeaverValleyUnit¹2Activities includereviewandapprovalofarchitect/engineer documentation, designoftheroddropdisconnect switchbox,equipment procurement, schedul-ing,anddocumentation transmittal.
6755B:1/062883~B-36 ROBERTJ.WARTENBERG
-Instruction Coordinator andInstructor, Instrumentation Technology TrainingCenter,Westinghouse ElectricCorporation Education:
-Community CollegeofAllegheny Country,12credithoursinEducation
-SouthernIllinoisUniversity, 69credithoursinEducation
-Militaryschools:Electronic Technician "A"School,BasicNuclearPowerSchool,andNuclearPowerPrototype Exerience:Mr.Wartenberg hasover8yearsofexperience inthenavalandcommercial nuclearfields,withemphasisonplantoperations andtraining, andsupervisory experience inallaspectsofcoursepresentation, personnel
- training, andprogramadministration anddevelopment.
Mr.Wartenberg assistsinhumanfactorsevaluations ofcontrolroomdesignsandprocedure verifica-tions.InOctoberof1981,hereceivedSeniorReactorOperatorcertification.
Asaninstruction coordinator, heisresponsible formeetingtheoverallobjectives ofallcustomersimulator coursesandthedirection ofinstructional activities offifteeninstructors, withparticipation directlyinstudentandinstructor evaluations andaudits.Previousworkexperience includesanassignement asaninstructor tothereactorcontrolsdivision, andasaqualified reactoroperatorandshutdownreactoroperatoronanavalnuclearprototype.
Asatrainingengineer, Mr.Wartenberg alsoassistedinthestartupoftheSNUPPSIIsimulator.
6755B:1/062883 B-37 G.ALLENELLIFF,EDUCATION:
Ph.D.,M.S.,B.S.,Industrial Engineering/Operations
- Research, TexasARMUniversity, 1973Industrial Engineering/Operations
- Research, TexasARMUniversity, 1971'ndustrial Engineering, TexasARMUniversity, 1970AFFILIATIONS:
AmericanInstitute ofIndustrial Engineers.
Operations ResearchSocietyofAmericaAlphaPiMu(Industrial Engineering HonorSociety)SigmaXiPROFESSIONAL BRIEF:Dr.ElliffisaBranchManagerinEssexCorporation's Alexandria office.Heiscurrently responsible formanagement, technical direction, andreviewofprojectsfornuclearindustryclientsoftheIndustrial ServicesDepartment.
Dr.Elliff'sutilityexperience includesdirectprojectmanagement responsibility forseveralnuclearpowerplantcontrolroomdesignreviews,aswellasmanagement oversight andreviewofrelatedprojectsfornuclearindustryclients.Hehas10yearsconsulting experience withthemilitary(Navy,AirForce,andOfficeoftheSecretary ofDefense);
otherfederalagencies(Department ofEnergy,Department ofTransportation);
andprivatesectorclients(utilities, motorcarriers, railroads, militaryhardwarevendors).
Hisexperience includesappliedhumanfactorsanalysis, maintenance management, logisticsupportanalysis, lifecyclecost/design tocostanalysis, information systemvalidation, businessandfinancial management, marketanalysis, transportation operations
- analysis, mathematical modelling, reliability/maintainability
- analysis, production engineering, statistical qualitycontrol,andtrainingcoursedevelopment andpresentation.
PriortojoiningEssexin1981,Dr.Elliffwasassociated withEvaluation ResearchCorporation; Peat,Marwick,Mitchell, RCo.;Logistics Management Institute; andtheTexasARMUniversity graduatefaculty.Dr.Elliffalsohasthreeyearsexperience asafull-time graduatefacultymemberatTexasARMUniversity teachingindustrial engineering andoperations researchcoursesandsupervising thesisresearch.
EXPERIENCE:
CANYONRESEARCHGROUP,aDivisionofEssexCorporation (1981-Present)Manaer0erationsAnalsisBranchIndustrial ServicesDeartment-Providemanagement andtechnical direction forconductofIndustrial ServicesDepartment operations analysisprojects.
Haveprimarytechnical responsibility foralloperational taskanalysis, probabilistic riskassessment, andhumanreliability analysesfortheIndustrial ServicesDepartment.
Serveasseniortechnical resourceforapplication ofindustrial engineering andoperations researchtechniques toclientsituations.
Responsible fortechnical reviewofclientdeliverables.
B-39 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)
Providemanagement reviewofprojectplan,technical scope,andresourceestimates forIndustrial ServicesDepartment projects.
Asbranchmanager,supervise humanfactorsanalystsandlicensedSeniorReactorOperators (SROs).Assignappropriate personnel toclientprojects, asneeded.MonitorcostandschedulestatusonallIndustrial ServicesDpartmentprojectstoensurecompletion ofproductstoclientsatisfaction.
Projectmanagerfordetailedcontrolroomdesignreview(DCRDR)forPublicServiceElectricandGasCompany's HopeCreekGenerating Station(HCGS).HCGS'isaneartermoperating licenseboilingwaterreactor.Thecontrolroomisoneofthemoreadvancednuclearpowerplantcontrolr'oomsintheUnitedStatesandemploysseveralCRTs.AlsoservingasprojectmanagerforDCRDRofDonaldC.CookUnitland2controlrooms.D.C.Cookplantisanoperating plantwithseveralyearsofoperating experience.
ManageddetailedhumanfactorscontrolroomdesignreviewforTexasUtilities Generating Company's ComanchePeakSteamElectricStation(CPSES)Unitl.Evaluated controlroomforcompliance withhumanengineering principles andapplicable regulatory guidelines.
DirectedEssexhumanfactorsanalystsandSROsinassessment ofproposedclientrearrangement ofCPSEScontrolboards.Assistedclientindesignandapplication ofmimics,demarcation, andhierarchical labelingoftheCPSESUnitlcontrolboards.Developed amodelforpredicting humanreliability innuclearpowerplantcontrolroomoperations.
Foraforeignnuclearutility,developed estimates ofexpectedimprovements inoperatorreliability forsuggested backfitstoresolvethirty"genericcontrolroomdesignproblems.
Providedgeneralmanagement direction formajorprocedures development andproduction projectforaneartermoperating license(NTOL)plant.Thefirstphaseoftheprojectinvolvedrewriting/reformatting ofallemergency,
- abnormal, andstandardoperating procedures.
Asaresultofprojectteamperformance, Essexwasalsoawardedcontractfordevelopment andproduction ofapproximately 300nuclearpowerplantsurveillance/test procedures.
Thisphaseinvolvedrewrite/reformat, technical review,andeditingofprocedures; technical direction ofallprojectstaff;andcoordination oftheproduction oftheprocedures frominitialwritingthroughfinalwordprocessing.
Essexprojectteamwascomposedof6to8technical writers,twoeditors,twonuclearplantoperations specialists, and8wordprocessors, plustwoshiftsupervisors fromclientorganization.
EVALUATION RESEARCHCORPORATION Vienna,Virginia(1979-1981)
PrincialEnineerandBranchManaerSstemsEnineerinandAnalsisGrouProvidedtechnical andengineering supporttoNAVSEA,NAVELEX,NAVAIR,andotherFederalgovernment clients.Thissupportincludedintegrated logistics support(ILS)analyses, systemsanalysis, systemsengineering, costanalysis, andapplication ofopera-tionsresearchtechniques forshipandsystemacquisition programsandILSfunctional offices.B-40 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)
Participated indevelopment ofNAVSEAReliability andMaintainability Technical Seminar.Performed acomparative lifecyclecost(LCC)analysisof3EREDandCHTmarinesanitation systemsforDD963classships.ResultswereaprimeinputtoNADECbriefing.
AsamemberofCAPTORProduction Readiness Review(PRR)Team,assessedthecapability ofprimecontractor andfirsttiersubcontractor toeffectively managefull-scaleproduction.
AsaresultofthePRR,thecontractors wererequiredtomakesubstantive improvements toproduction controlprocedures priortofullproduction release.Developed multipleregression modeltoprojectNavyship-building qualityassurance (QA)manpowerrequirements basedonworkloaddescriptor parameters.
Developed ananalyticapproachandplanfortrade-off andcostimpactanalysisofalternative aviationintermediate maintenance supportstrategies fortheAviationInter-mediateMaintenance Improvement ProjectOffice.Objective ofthistaskwasidentifica-tionofthecomplement ofintermediate-level maintenance equipment, spareparts,andpersonnel skillsthatwouldmostimprovemissioneffectiveness ofthedeckloadofagivenaircraftcarrier.Analyticapproachintegrated existingNavydatafilesandmodelstothegreatestextentpractical.
Managedprojecttoassessperformance andeffectiveness ofdefensecontractor inproviding supplyanddepotrepairsupportonAN/SLQ-32(V).
Evaluated timeliness, quality,andcostofdepotrepairandsupplysupportprovidedbycontractor.
Integrated andcross-validated transaction datafromnumerouscontractor internaldatasources,including ADPreports,manuallogbooks,andsourcedocuments.
Assessedoperational availability basedonanalysisofCASREPTSand0790-2Kformsanddata.Determined systemstockandmaintenance repairpartsrequirements tosupportAN/SLQ-32(V).
Assistedinconducting FY1981provisioning conference.
Preparedcontractorderstoimplement resultsofprovisioning conference.
Attendedprogramreviewsinsupportofprogramoffice.Providedtechnical reviewofLogisticSupportAnalysis(LSA)ProgramPlanforArmyStand-off TargetAcquisition System(SOTAS)undercontracttoMotorola.
SeniorAnalstandPro'ectManaerPlanninandSciencesGrou-ManagedanddirectednumerousprojectsforU.S.Department ofEnergyclients.Seniortechnical analystforquantitative analysistasksforthePlanningandSciencesGroup.Directedindependent validations ofvariousDOEandindustryinformation systemsandmodels.ManagedaprojecttovalidatetheDOECrudeOilTransferPricingSystem(ERA-51).
Projectincludedassessment ofuserrequirements, respondent reporting andmeasurement practices, andDOEdataprocessing procedures.
Qualitative andquantitative analysesfordataconsistency andvaliditywereperformed, bothwithinERA-51andbetweenERA-51andrelatedDOEreporting systems.8-41 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)
Providedtechnical andmanagement direction forquantitative dataanalysesforfourdatasystemsproviding information onmajorindustrial combustors tosupportenforce-,
mentofthePowerPlantandIndustrial FuelUseAct.SystemsanalyzedincludedtheDOEBoilerManufacturer's Report(ERA-97),
DOE1975MajorFuelBurningInstallation CoalConversion Report(FEA-C-602-S-O),
DOE1980Manufacturing Industries EnergyCon-sumptionStudyandSurveyofLargeCombustors (EIA-063),
andEPANationalEmissions DataSystem(NEDS).Developed scenarios forassessment ofrefineryindustrycapability torespondtovarioussupplyanddemandscenarios.
Analysisrequiredfamiliarity withtworefinerymodels:BonnerandMooreRefineryandPetrochemical ModelingSystem(RPMS)andTurner,Mason,Solomon(TMS)refinerymodel.RPMSandTMSmodelswerelinkedtoaccountforrefineryprocessing capabilities, transportation network,andpetroleum inventory management considerations..
Developed productpricesandcost,quality,andquantitycharacteristics ofcrudeslatesforseveralrefineries usingDOEdatainquick-reaction supportfortheOfficeofSpecialCounsel(OSC).DatawasinputtoRPMS,whichwasusedinsupportofOSCauditandcompliance analysis.
~c"PEAT>MARWICKyMITCHELLRCOWashington, D.C.(1975-1979)jISeniorConsultant andPro'ectManaer-Managedthe'evelopment andimplementa-tionofalifecyclecostbudgetary projection modelfortheHARPOONProjectOffice.Determined anddocumented logistics resources forsupportofagivenprocurement schedule; developed andvalidated predictive costestimating relationships; identified appropriation andbudgetsponsorsforeachenditemandlogisticresourcecategory; anddeveloped time-phased fundingrequirements byappropriation tosupportaparticular acquisition scenario.
Asamemberofamanagement auditteam,evaluated theanalyticcapability oftheF-16SystemProjectOfficeorganization.
Areasevaluated includedlifecyclecost/design tocost(LCC/DTC) estimation andtrackingcapability, configuration management, ILSplanningandcoordination, andassessment oftheextenttowhichacommondatabaseofcostandperformance parameters wasmaintained foruseinperforming thevariousanalytictasks.Definedanddeveloped anintegrated projecttaskmanagement information system(MIS)fortheShipboard Intermediate RangeCombatSystemProjectOffice.Surveyedinformation requirements; conducted aninventory andasse'ssment ofinformation sources;definedinformation flows;investigated information processing anddisplayalternatives; anddeveloped anMIStoprovidekeyprojectpersonnel withcurrentandprojected cost/schedule status,varianceanalyses, financial flexibility
- analyses, andassessment oftheprobableimpactofpotential management decisions.
8-42 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)
Developed andpresented seminarsforcommercial clientsonlifecyclecost/design tocost,Department ofDefense(DOD)acquisition
- policies, andDODmarketing.
Servedascorporate representative
'totheWeaponSystemLifeSupport(WSLS)groupunderNSIALogistics Management Committee (LOMAC).ManagedaprojectfortheFederalRailroadAdministration toperformsystemsengineering forintermodal freightsystems.Identified, described, andanalyzedthefullrangeofimprovedandinnovative components, subsystems, andsystems.Assessedproposedinnovations andimprovedtechnologies forpotential toimprove"profitability andreturnoninvestment forrail-based intermodal freightsystems;Principal Investigator foraprojecttodevelopanimprovedpassenger carmainte-nanceandutilization programfortheNationalRailroadPassenger Corporation (AMTRAK).
Specificresponsibilities includedassessment oftheeffectiveness ofthecurrentAMTRAKpassenger carmaintenance process,identification oftrade-offs betweenpassenger carmaintenance andpassenger carutilization, anddevelopment ofrecommendations forimproving boththequalityofAMTRAKmaintenance andutilization ofitspassenger carfleet.ManagedastudyfortheFederalRailroadAdministration toassessalternative organizational structures foryardsandterminals fortheUnitedStatesrailindustry.
Analyzedmanagement controlsystems,measuresofeffectiveness, andtheeffectoforganizational alternatives foryardsandterminals ontheinfrastructure oftherailindustry.
Managedprojectsforprivaterailroads involving market,operations, andtrafficanalysis, anddevelopment ofbusinessstrategies.
Foramajormotorcarrier,performed ananalysisofterminalandline-haul operations toimprovecarrierprofitability andoperational efficiency.LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE Washington, D.C.(1970-1975)SeniorResearchAssociate
-ForPMS306,underjointsponsorship withtheAssistant Secretary ofDefenseInstallations andLo'gistics),
analyzedandevaluated theabilityoftheNavy'sintermediate-level maintenance activities tosupportthesurfaceFleetinthemid-1980's.
Responsibility includedassessment oftheadequacyoftheNavy'smainte-nancedatacollection system(MDCS)indocumenting maintenance delivered totheFleet,trade-off analysestodetermine themosteffective utilization ofNavyresources insupporting thesurfaceFleet,anddevelopment ofspecificrecommendations forimprovement.
Developed amanagement information systemandtheassociated databasetoassistplannersintheOfficeoftheAssistant Secretary ofDefense(Installations andLogistics) inmakingpolicydecisions regarding avionicsstandardization.
Thesystem.wascapableofproducing annualprojections ofthedemandforavionicssystemsintermsoffunctional requirement and/orassociated hardwarebyTMSofaircraft, attheequipment level,foraircraftscheduled formajormodification oracquisition duringthe1975-1985 timeframe.
G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)
Thedatabasecouldbereadilyupdatedonanannualbasis,therebyenablingthesystemtocontinueproviding 10yearprojections.
Developed acostelementstructure (CES)forlifecyclecost(LCC)analysisoftrackedvehiclesasinputtoanLMItaskaddressing thefeasibility ofastandardized LCCCESforvarioustypesofDODsystems.TEXASARMUNIVERSITY CollegeStation,Texas(1972-'1970)Assistant Professor ofIndustrial Enineerin-Taughtgraduatecoursesandsupervised thesisresearchinoperations
- research, production engineering, manufacturing processes, production management, engineering costestimating, production andinventory control,andqualityassurance tograduatestudentsinreliability andmaintainability engineering programssponsored bytheArmyMaterialCommand(nowDARCOM).Dissertation topicaddressed economicdesignofacontinuous samplingqualityassurance plan,whichhasresultedinapublication andpresentations.
PUBLICATIONS ANDTECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS
'ranco,3.,Elliff,G.A.,andTulis,E.A.Memorandum Reort-DevelomentofProductPricesforRPMSStaticRefinerModel,3une2,1981.PreparedforOfficeofTechnology andComputerSciences, OfficeofSpecialCounsel,EconomicRegulatory Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Elliff,G.A.,andFranco,3.Alicabilit ofDOEModelsinShort-Term Continenc~plannin, March27,f981.PreparedforOfficeofTechnology andComputerScience,OfficeofSpecialCounsel,EconomicRegulatory Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Elliff,G.A.Memorandum Reort-AssinrnentofCoststoCrudeOilFeedstocks forEstablishin StaticRefinerBaseCasesMarch19,1981.PreparedforOfficeofTechnology andComputerScience,OfficeofSpecialCounsel,EconomicRegulatory Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Elliff,G.A.,andTulis,E.A.Memorandum Reort-Analsisofthe"AveraeDa"ConcetforEstablishin CrudeandProductSlatesforSohioBaseCases,February9,1981.PreparedforOfficeofTechnology andComputerScience,OfficeofSpecialCounsel,EconomicRegulatory Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Elliff,G.A.,andTulis,E.A.Preliminar AnalsisoftheDOETransferPricinSstem,February1,1981.PreparedfortheOfficeofEnergyInformation Validation, EnergyInformation Administration, U.S.Department ofEnergy.Leilich,R.H.,Elliff,G.A.,etal.SstemsEnineerinforIntermodal FreihtSstems(3volumes).
PreparedfortheFederalRailroadAdministration, U.S.Department ofTransportation, March1978.B-44 G.ALLENELLIFF(continued)
Yager,R.,Elliff,G.A.,andBauer,R.StudtoDeveloanIntercitPassenerCarMaintenance andUtilization Proram,April1977.PreparedfortheFederalRailroadAdministration, U.S.DOT,andNationalRailroadPassenger Corporation (AMTRAK).Fisher,W.,Elliff,G.A.,andWhite,3.M..DODDemandforSelectedAvionicAssemblies-PhaseI.InterimReportonLMITask75-9,November1975.Shepherd, F.,Elliff,G;A.,andWroblewski, P.SurfaceShiMaintenance, LMIReport70-21,ADA008233,3anuary1975.Elliff,G.A.,andFoster,3.W."ANoteofCalculation oftheAverageFractionInspected foraContinuous SamplingPlan."International 3ournalofProduction
- Research, 1975.Elliff,G.A.,andFoster,3.W."LeastCostContinuous SamplingPlans."Presented atORSA/TIMS 3ointNationalMeeting,LasVegas,Nevada,November1975.Elliff,G.A.,andFoster,3.W."Economic DesignofaMultilevel Continuous SamplingPlan."Presented atAOASymposium onLogistics, FortLee,Virginia, February1970.Elliff,G.A."AnEconomicBasiswithInspector AccuracyConsiderations forDesignofaMulti-level Continuous SamplingPlan,"unpublished doctoraldissertation, TexasARMUniversity, 1973.Elliff,G.A."CostOptimization ofaTrickling Filtration SewageTreatment FacilityUsingPatternSearchwithSummation ofGradients,"
unpublished masters'hesis, TexasARMUniversity, 1971.SECURITYCLEARANCE:
SECRET,grantedbyDISCO(1970).B-45 JOHNFFARBRY,JR.EDUCATION:
BachelorofArchitecture, Washington University, 1965.M.A.Experimental Psychology, University ofMissouri-Columbia, 1973Ph.D.Experimental Psychology, University ofMissouri-Columbia, 1978;MajorArea:HumanMemoryandCognition AFFILIATIONS:
AmericanPsychological Association (Member)Division21:SocietyofEngineering Psychologists HumanFactorsSociety(Member)Technical InterestGroup:ComputerSystemsPotomacChapteroftheHumanFactorsSociety(Member)PROFESSIONAL BRIEF:Dr.Farbry'sactivityinpsychology hasbeenconcerned withbasicresearchinhumanperformance,
- teaching, andtheapplication ofpsychological knowledge tocomplexsystemsinindustrial settings.
Hisresearchactivityinvolvestheinvestigation ofstresseffectsinteracting withindividual differences.and theanalysisofhumanmemoryandlearning.
Inthefirstarea,stresseffectswereexaminedwithregardtocopingresponses inaVAhospitalenvironment.
Also,theeffectsofstressonproblem-solving behaviorwerestudiedinalaboratory setting.Thesecondareaincludesthestudyofqualitative changesinmemoryoveranextendedperiodoftimeandtheobservation oferrorbehaviorinrotelearning.
Theundergraduate coursestaughtincludeexperimental method,physiological psychology, introductory psychology andthepsychology oflanguage.
DuringhisthreeyearsatEssex,hisworkhasbeenprimarily concerned withtheanalysisandevaluation oftheoperator-machine interface innuclearpowerplantcontrolrooms.Thisworkhasbeendirectedprimarily totheevaluation ofconventional PWRandBWRmaincontrolroomsintheU.S.andaBWRradwastecontrolroominJapan.Hehasconducted designstudiesofcontrolpanelcomponent arrangement inbothcases.Thetwomostrecentprojectshavefocusedontheevaluation ofCRTdisplaysystemsinadvancedcontrolroomsforBWRandPWRfacilities inJapan.EXPERIENCE:
ESSEXCORPORATION (1980-Present)roomofChubuElectricPowerCompany.Thisworkincludedtheupdatingandreorgani-zationofCRTspecifications; analysisofpopulation stereotype datafromclientoperations personnel andapplication oftheresultstoCRTevaluation.
Conducted reviewoffunctional allocation betweencontrolroomoperatorvs.CRT,system andaninformation availability analysis.
Evaluation, ofCRTdisplaysystemincluding featuresofCRTformatorganization, color/symbol schemes,alarmsystem,CRTinformation accessandlabeling.
ResearchScientist.
Developed generalguidelines and'criteria tosupportdesignofmaincontrolroominanuclearpowerplant.Theguidelines weredirectedtotheB-47 3OHNE.FARBRY,3R.(Continued) arrangement andgroupingofcomponents andcomponent systemsonthemaincontrolpanel,thedetermination oftheprofileandfloorplanconfiguration ofthecontrolpanelandtheplanningofthecontrolroomfacility.
ResearchScientist.
Developed population stereotype questionnaire forcontrolpanelelementswithresultsappliedtostereotype specification foranadvancedcontrolroom(ACR)ofapressurized
'waterreactorunitforMitsubishi HeavyIndustries.
Alsoevaluated CRTpagesforACRandstudiedoperatormovementamongCRTs.Developed voice-computercommunication guidelines tosupportinteractive computersystems.Pro'ectEnineer.Evaluation ofproposedandexistingcontrolpanelsforradwastecontrolroomofboilingwaterreactorplantfor3apanAtomicPowerCompany.Short-andlong-term recommendations weremaderegarding thearrangement ofpanelcomponents, proposedcomponent typesandannunciator system.Therecommendations includedadesignproposalforthecomponent arrangement oftworadwastecontrolsubpanels.
ResearchAssociate.
Performed humanfactorsevaluation andadesignstudyformaincontrolpanelarrangement ofnewpressurized waterreactorpowerplantforCarolinaPowerandLight.Alsoparticipated inon-siteevaluation ofindividual components andpanelarrangement formaincontrolpanelofexistingboilingwaterreactorplantandpreparedlabelbackfitsupplement.
HELLMUTH,OBATA,ANDKASSABAUM, INC.SaintLouis,Missouri(1978-1980)Architectural Draftsman/Research.
Commercial structures:
preparation ofcon-struction documents, statistical researchonfirmsdistribution ofmanpoweracrossdifferent buildingtypes.Clientcontact,coordination withstructural andmechanical engineers, buildingcodeanalysis.
CHINNANDASSOCIATES
- Columbia, Missouri(1977-1978)Architectural Draftsman.
Commercial andresidential structures.
Coordination withstructural andmechanical engineers, preparation ofconstruction documents suchassiteplans,floorplans,elevations, construction detailsandperspectives.
STEPHENSCOLLEGEColumbia, Missouri(1976-1977)Instructor.
Department ofPsychology.
Fullresponsibility forsixcoursesinBasicPsychology andcoursesinPsychobiology andthePsychology ofLanguage.
Also,studentadvisingandstaffseminarparticipation.
B-48 3OHNE.FARBRY,3R.(Continued)
MID-MISSOURI MENTALHEALTHCENTER,Columbia, Missouri(1970-1976)ResearchAssistant
-Coordinated medical,research, andtechnical staffforpsychological researchonstressinhospitalpatientsreceiving adifficult examination (endoscopy).
Alsorecording ofpolygraph databeforeandduringexamination, pre-andpost-patient interviews, datareduction/preliminary
- analysis, libraryresearch, andassis-tancewiththepreparation ofavarietyofjournalarticles.
CHINN,DARROUGH, ANDCOMPANYColumbia, Missouri(1973-1970)Architectural Draftsman.
Commercial andresidential structures:
preparation ofconstruction documents, coordination withstructural andmechanical engineers.
UNIVERSITY OFMISSOURIColumbia, Missouri(1973)TeachinAssistant.
Department ofHomeEconomics.
Architectural DesignII:Taughtdesign,process,planning, anddevelopment ofdraftingskills.Delineation course:Emphasisoncolormediaappliedtointeriorperspective drawing.UNIVERSITY OFMISSOURIColumbia, Missouri(1969-1973)"TeachinAssistant.
Department ofPsychology.
GeneralExperimental Psychology (Laboratory Instructor; GeneralPsychology (CourseCoordinator, Discussion Leader);andResearchMethods,TheSenses,AppliedPsychology (Assistant).
UNIVERSITY OFMISSOURIColumbia, Missouri(1969-1971)ResearchAssistant.
Department ofPsychology.
Designofgraphicstimuli(faceassistance withthewritingofjournalarticles.
- HELLMUTH, OBATA,ANDKASSABAUM, INC.*(1966-1968)SaintLouis,MissouriArchitectural Draftsman.
Commercial structures:
documents.
preparation ofconstruction A.L.AYDELOTTANDASSOCIATES Memphis,Tennessee (1965)Architectural Draftsman.
Commercial structures:
documents.
preparation ofconstruction B-49 3OHNE.FARBRY,3R.(Continued)
TECHNICAL REPORTS:SummarReort:AHumanEnineerinReviewofanAdvancedControlRoomCRTDislaSstemfortheChubuElectricPowerComan.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,inpress.(withD.Eike)HumanEnineerinSecifications foranAdvancedControlRoomCRTDislaSstemfortheChubuElectricPowerComan.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,inpress.(withR.Kane,S.Fleger,andT.O'Donoghue)
AFunctional Allocation ReviewofanAdvancedControlRoomCRTDislaSstemfortheChubuElectricPowerComan.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,inpress,(withT.Harding).
AHumanEnineerinEvaluation ofanAdvancedControlRoomCRTDislaSstemfortheChubuElectricPowerComan.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,inpress.(withS.Fleger,R.Kane,T.Harding,andD.Pilsitz).
ResonseSterotesof3aaneseControlRoom0eratorstoElementsofCRTDisla~Sstems.Technical ReportforChubuElectricPowerCompany,Inc.inNagoya,3apan,October,1982.AHumanEnineerinEvaluation ofCRTFormatsCRTsandKeboardsfortheMitsubishi HeavIndustries AdvancedControlRoom.Technical ReportforMitsubisi HeavyIndustries, 3apan,3uly1982.withR.Kane,S.Fleger,T.HardingandF.Piccione)
Extracontractual Studieson:StressMethodforDesinCriteriaEvaluation andPCCConfiurationStud.Technical ReportforMitsubishi HeavyIndustries, 3apan,3uly,12.withR.Kane,D.Metcalf,R.Benel,S.Fleger)Resonsestereoesof3aanesenuclearowerlantcontrolroomoerators.StudyforMitsubishi HeavyIndustries, December1981.(withR.KaneandS.Fleger)Sstem-SecificSecifications BasicConsoleEvaluation andHumanEnineerinLibrarBibliorahforAdvancedControlRoom.Technical ReportforMitsubishi HeavyIndustries, 3apan,3uly1982.withR.Kane,H.Manning,S.Fleger,T.O'Donoghue, N.Tulloh,andL.Grealis)Humanfactorsevaluation reortontheTsuruaNumberOneNewRadwasteControlRoom.Finalreportpreparedforthe3apanAtomicPowerCompany,September 1981.(withA.Strong)LabelbackfitsulementBSEP1andBSEP2.PreparedforCarolinaPowerandLight,September 1981.B-50 3OHNE.FARBRY,3R.(Continued)
Humanfactorsevaluation reortfortheBrunswick Unit1andUnit2ControlRoom.FinalReportprepared!for CarolinaPowerandLight,September 1981.(withW.Talley,D.Beith,E.Talley,andT.3ustice)Humanfactorsdesinevaluation reortfortheShearonHarrisUnit1controlroom.FinalreportpreparedforCarolinaPowerandLight,September"'1981.
(withW.Talley,3.Haher,T.Amerson,D.Beith,andT.3ustice)3OURNALARTICLES:
Control-display integration onlarge,multi-system controlpanels.Proceedin softheHumanFactorsSociet25thAnnualMeetin.Rochester, NewYork1981.(withT.HardingandK.MalloryEvaluative persistence:
Saltfromtheevaporative forgetting process.Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979,39(No.8),0068B.Greaterrepetition oferrorsunderperformance comparedtoobservation inmultiple-choicehumanlearning.
PercetualandMotorSkills,1973,37,909-950.,
(withM.H.MarxandD.Witter)Psychological preparation forendoscopy.
Gastrointestinal Endosco,1977,20,9-13.(withR.H.Shipley,3.H.Butt,andB.Horwitz),Preparation forastressful medicalprocedure:
Effectofamountofstimuluspreexposure andcopingstyle.3ournalofConsultin andClinicalPsvcholo, 1978,06,099-507.(withR.H.Shipley,3.H.Butt,andB.HorwitzLong-term persistence ofresponse-repetition tendencies basedonperformance orobser-vation.BulletinofthePschonomicSociet,1978,8,65-67.(withD.W.WitterandM.H.Marx)PRESENTATIONS:
Evaluative persistence:
Alongtermmemoryforfirstimpressions.
Paperpresented attheconvention oftheAmericanPsychological Association,
- Montreal, September 1980.Videotape preparation forastressful medicalprocedure:
Effectsofnumberofexposures.
Paperpresented atthemeetingoftheAssociation forAdvancement ofBehaviorTherapy,NewYorkCity,December1976.(withR.H.Shipley,3.H.Butt,andB.Horwitz)8-51 ASw.CIn EDUCATION University ofHartford, B.S.,Mechanical Engineering, 1965UnionCollege,graduatecourses1966-1969 Northeastern University, graduatecourses1969-1970 GeneralElectricAdvancedCourseinEngineering EXPERIENCE AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation, 1983-Present NUSCORPORATIONS 1978-1983 AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation, 1971-1978 StoneaWebsterEngineering Company,1969-1971 KnollsAtomicPowerLaboratory, 1965-1969 AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation
-Manager,NuclearSafetyandLicensing.
Management anddirection ofsectionpersonnel incarryingoutassignedresponsibilities andactivities whichincludesmaintenance ofNRCrelateddocumentation, reviewcoordination, andresolution ofallmatterspertaining tonuclearsafetyaffecting AEPSC.Provideknowledge, expertise, andanalytical capability innuclearsafetyrelatedmattersnecessary tosupportplantoperations andlicensing efforts.IalsoserveasSecretary, NSDRC,andasCorporate Cognizant Engi'neer forNuclearSafety.NUS-Havebeenresponsible foravarietyofsafetyanalysisandlicensing activities insupportofdomesticandforeignutilities.
Typicalactivities haveincluded:
ServiceforeightmonthsasamemberoftheOn-SiteSafetyReviewGroup,SalemGenerating Stationgtechnical specification coordinator foralargedomesticutilityyprojectmanagerforNUSsupportactivities ontheFSARupdateoftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantyprojectmanagerfortheBigRockPointPlantSpentFuelrackAdditionConsolidated Environmental ImpactEvaluation andSafetyAnalysisReportsandtechnical advisortotheJapaneseSurveyGrouponnewsitingconcepts.
UntilOctober1982wasManager,NuclearWasteManagement Department.
Dutiesincludedprojectmanagement andtechnical contribution tofulfillNUScontractual responsibilities totheBasaltWasteIsolation ProgramandtheOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation.
Varioussafetyandlicensing activities performed underthesecontracts includeddevelopment oflicensing coordination plans,performance ofoperational andlongtermradiological safetyandriskanalysesfornuclearwasterepositories, development ofapreliminary safetyanalysisreportforanuclearwasterepository inadomedsaltformation, development ofguidelines foraqualityassurance program,andperformance ofcostbenefitanalyses.
AlsoservedasamemberofanONWI-sponsored taskforceongeotechnical andanthropomorphic problemsassociated withsitinganuclearwasterepository inadomedsaltformation.
JhNES0FEZNSTEIH PAGB2AmericanBlectricpcnrerServiceCorporation
-LeadEngineerSafetyAnalysisandsubsequently Hanager,NuclearSafetyanLicensing.
Dutiesincludedsupportoflicensing, design/construction, andoperation oftheDonaldC.CookNucleartthefirstNestinghouse PNRwithanicecondenser containment tobelicensedforoperation.
Princpa1ibilitywastoassurethatallsafetysystemsweredesignedandanalyzedinamanneracceptable totheUnitedStatesNuclearRegulatory Commission.
Involvedinmanyfirst-of-a-kind
- analyses, systemsdesign,andtechnical speccaonifitidevelopment intheareasofheattransfer,fluiddynamics, thermalhydraulicst postLOCAyghdroengeneration, icesublimation, radiological doseanalyses, etc.Responsible fortechnical andadministrative coordinat'ion ofmajorprojectssuchasplantmodifications requiredtomeetNRCconcernsonhighenergylinebreaksoutsidecontainment, ECCSsystemsdesign,andenvironmental qualificationofonsibilit safetyrelatedequipment.
Hadleadtechnical responsib yforAmericanElectxicPowerformeetingswiththeNRCandforpresentations totheAdvisoryCommittee onReactorSafeguards.
Nasresponseoxiblfthetechnical inputandcoordination ofsafetyreviewsofdesignchanges,theFinalSafetyayRtndamendments andoralandwrittencorrespondence withtheNRC.Supervisory responsibility fordevelopme tcommitment lists,Nestinghouse ownersgroupactivities, firettirogramN-lists,technical specifications, securityplan,emergency plan,internalQAprocedur, peslanthealthphysicssupport,nuclearsafetyandlicensing aspectsff1eloadsprobabilistic riskassessment studies>etc.WasSecretary ofNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee, memberofEdisonElectricInstitute ad-hoccommittee tocommentonNASH-1400'ompany representative tojointutility-AEC-vendortaskforceonwatexreactorsafetyresearch(latertakenoverbyEPRI),memberofjointTVA-DUKE-AEP icecondenser taskforce,andChairmanofHeliumBreederAssociates Committee toreviewsafetyandlicensing problemswithgascooledfastreactors.
StoneSWebster-Nasresponsible fordeveloping analysismethodsforcontainment designandpost-LOCA hydrogengeneration analysis.
Manyassumptions fromthisworkwerebntlyadaptedbytheNRCintheirpublished Regulatory Guide1.7~Alsoperformed prelimyinarevaluations todetermine whetherpx'obabilistic techniques couldbeusedfornuclearpowerplantdesign.KnllAtomicPowerLab-Performed thermalhydraulic analysisofnuclearreactors, des'nedtestsandexperiments, anddelivered traininglecturestoNavalpersonnel.
gAP JAMESGoPEZNSTEZN PAGE3EDUCATIONAL HONORSUniversity ofHartfordRegent'sAwardforbeingtopstudentinMechanical Engineering, 1964and1965AmericanSocietyofMechanical Engineers GreaterHartfordChapterAnnualAward1965KappaMu-HonoraryEngineering Fraternity PUBLICATIONS "PostDBAContainment HydrogenMethodsforCalculating andControlling HydrogenAccumulation'co-author) gpresented atANSTopicalMeetingonPowerReactorSystemandComponentst Williamsburg<
- Virginia, 1970."SurveyMethodsforAssessment ofRadiological ReleasefromGeological Repositories" (leadauthor)gpresented atANSAnnualMeetingAtlanta,Georgia,June1979.'Procedures,
- Barriers, StateVariables, andProcesses Important toNearFieldAnalysis"
-(leadauthor)ypresented atANSAnnualMeeting,LasVegas,Nevada,June1980."Evaluation ofConsequences toRiskofTimeFanCoolingUnitsareOutofServiceatSalemGenerating Station,"
preparedforPSE&GgNovember1981."Evaluation ofAnalytical ProblemsAssociated withChangeover toHotLegRecirculation Following aHypothetical LossofCoolantAccidentatSalemGenerating Station,"
preparedforPSE&G,October1981."Evaluation ofSafetyConcernsAssociated withLossofCoolantAccidentWithoutAutomatic Actuation ofContainment Sprays,"preparedforPSE&G,September 1981."Evaluation ofEffeetofDesignBasisAccidents onProposedChangestoAuxiliary Feedwater SystematSalemNuclearPowerGenerating Station,"
preparedforPSE&G,October1981."Evaluation ofHeatBalanceCodeUsedatSalemGenerating Station,"
preparedforPSE&G,December1981."Evaluation ofInadvertent HumanIntrusion intoaSaltDomeRepository bySolutionMining"(co-author) draftreportpreparedforOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation, September 1980~"Criticality AnalysisforaBrineFilledCavityinaSpentFuelNuclearWasteRepository LocatedinaDomedSaltFormation" (co-author),
NUS-TM-326, January1980.
JAMESQoFEZNSTEIN PAGE4"Questionnaire forPerforming SafetyEvaluations forChangestoStructures, Systems,andComponents attheSalemNuclearPlant,"preparedforPSEaG,July1981.'DonaldC.CookHuclearPlant,UnitHo.1,ResultsoftheDecember1974InitialWeighingProgram'repared forAmericanElectricPcnrer,March1975"LongTermEvaluation oftheIceCondenser System:ResultsoftheJanuary1976andApril1976IceWeighingPrograms" (leadauthor)July1976."LongTermEvaluation oftheIceCondenser System!ResultsoftheJanuary1977IceWeighingProgram"(leadauthor),May1977'SurveyofNewTypesofSitingResearchforNuclearPowerPlants"(leadauthor)NUS-4068, April1982."BigRockPointPlant:SpentFuelRackAdditionConsolidated Environmental ImpactEvaluation andSafetyAnalysis,"
(co-author),
April1982."Suggested QualityAssurance Requirements foraMinedGeologicRepository" (co-author),
NUS-TM-338, May1981."SafetyAnalysisReportAnnotated OutlineforaNuclearWasteRepository inaDeepGeologicFormation,
"(co-author)
NUS-TM-360, April1981."Preliminary Information ReportforaConceptual Reference Repository inaDeepGeological Formation,"
(co-author) draftreportpreparedforofficeofNuclearWasteIsolation, January1980."MethodforDeveloping theQ-listforaGeologicRepository" (co-author),
NUS-TM-343, April1981."APreliminary Assessment ofthePNLStrontium HeatSourceDevelopment ProgramtoDetermine itsAdequacyforLicensing PurposesinFY1981,"(co-author) draftreportpreparedforBattelleNorthwest, August1979."Annotated Bibliography foraCostBenefitStudyofSeveralAspectsofaNuclearWasteRepository" NUS-3528, July1980."CostBenefitStudyofSeveralAspectsofaGeologicNuclearWasteRepository" preparedforBasaltWasteIsolation Program,NUS-3569, April1980.
JAMESGoFKINSTEIN PAGE5"QualityAssurance Classification Requirements forStructures, Systems,Components, andActivities RelatedtoaMinedGeologicRepository forPermanent Disposal'ofHighLevelNuclearWaste"(co-author) preparedasadraftforOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation, March1980."Applicable Requirements, Supporting Sequences, andPreliminary StrategyfortheOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation Licensing Coordination Plan(co-author),
NUS-3267, October1980.NWTSLicensing PlanforHighLevelWasteRepositories inGeologicFormations (co-author),
preparedasadraftforOfficeofNuclearWasteIsolation, September 1978."DonaldC.CookNuclearPlant,Units1and2,FinalSafetyAnalysisReport-Update"(pro)ectmanagerandleadcontributor),
June1982."DonaldC.CookNuclearPlant,Units1and2,FinalSafetyAnalysisReportandAmendments" (co-author)
.
APPENDIXCANNUNCIATOR SURVEYTASKPLAN6755B:1/062883C-1 181TP-3.11May1983D-C.COOKNUCLEARPLANTDCRDRPROGRAMHLMANFACTORSTASKPLANFORTHEANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMREVIEWCanyonResearchGroupTheEssexBuilding333NorthFairfaxStreetAlexandria, Virginia22314(7O3)S48-4SOOPREPAREDBY:Signature DCRDRDesignReviewTeamHumanFactorsConsultant DateAPPROVEDBY:Signature DCRDRProjectReviewTeamDate)PERFORMED BY:Signature DCRDRDesignReviewTeamHumanFactorsConsultant Date)
D.C.COOKNUCLEARPLANTDCRDRPROGRAMANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMREVIEWTP-3.11May1983RECORDOFREVISIONS Rev.DateDescrition 181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983TABLEOFCONTENTS1.0OBJECTIVES2.0REVIEWTEAMSELECTION ANDRESPONSIBILITIES 3.0'RITERIA Pacae4.0PROCEDURES 4.1GeneralInstructions 4.2DataCollection 4.3Analysis5.0EQUIPMENT/FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 6.0INPUTSANDDATAFORMS7.0OUTPUTSANDRESULTS8.0FIGURESANDTABLES'"9.0PROCEDURE EXCEPTIONS A.CRITERIAB.DATAFORMSC.CRITERIAMATRIXD.TASKPLANCRITIQUEAPPENDICES 181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19831.0OBJECTIVES a.Toassesstowhatdegreetheannunciator systemconformstothegenericcriteriainNUREG-0700.
b.Toidentifyanddocumentanyfeaturesintheannunciator systemdesignthatdonotconformtothecriteriainNUREG-0700.
c.Toidentifyanddocumentanyplant-specific designconventions andotherplant-specific humanfactorscriterianotdefinedinNUREG-0700.
2.0 REVIEWTEAMSELECTION
ANORESPONSIBILITIES a.Ahumanfactorsspecialist toconductthedatacollection andanalysisandtopreparethetaskreport.b.Aclientnuclearoperations specialist tosupplyplantsystemsinformation concerning alarmparameters andalarmresponseprocedures.
c.AclientplantIhCengineertoassistinidentifying relevantplantsystemsinformation.
3.0CRITERIAThecriteriaarefromNUREG-0700; paragraphs 6.3.1.1;6.3.1.2athroughd(2);6.3.1.3athroughd;6.3.1.4aandb;6.3.1.5athroughb(3);6.3.2.lathroughf;6.3.3.1athroughb(2);6.3.2.2aandb;6.3.3.1athroughc(3);6.3.3.2athroughf(2);6.3.3.3athroughf;6.3.3.4athroughd;6.3.3.5athroughd(6);6.3.4.1athroughd(2);6.3.4.2athroughc;6.3.4.3aandb;6.5.1.6athroughc(2)ande(1)through3(3);and6.6.6.2a, b,andc(seeAppendixA).4.0PROCEDURES 4.1GeneralInstructions 4.1.1Preparation andConductofProcedures a.Priortoconductofthistask,ensurethatallrequireddataforms,plantdocumentation, engineering
- drawings, equipment, andmaterials areavailable.
Ensurethatpermission hasbeen'btained forallrequiredaccesstothecontrolroomorotherplantareas.
181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983b.Recordallexceptions, deviations, orchanges"totheseprocedures inSection9.0ofthisTaskPlan.Numbereachentrysequentially, startingwith1.Includeanexplanation (technical justification) astowhytheexception, deviation, orchangewasmade.4.1.2TaskPlanCritiqueUponcompletion of.thistask,fillouttheTaskPlanCritiquecontained
'inAppendixD.Submitthecompleted critiquetoyou'rsupervisor orprojectmanager.4.2DataCollection a.Dataarecollected usingvariousmethodsandprocedures consistihg ofmeasurements, observations, interviews andquestionnaires, anddocumentreviews.,AppendixCillustrates thedistribution ofthecriteriaforthevariousmethods.b.Measurements andobservations shouldbemadeforallitemscontained ontheMeasurements dataformsandObservations checklists contained inAppendixB.c.Theoperatorquestionnaire (Appendix B)shouldbeadministered toatleast50,percentofthelicensedreactoroperators fortheplant.Administration maybeconducted
- .singlyorinagroup,butshouldbeproctored ormonitored.
d.TheresultsoftheSystemFunctionandTaskAnalysistasksshouldbereviewed-forannunciator-relevant datainreference to6.3.3.1;6.3.1.4a; 6.3.3bandd(2);6.3.3s4aandc;6.3.43a;and6.6.6.2a(l),
(2),and(3).e.Inadditiontothereviewresultsfromd,above,plantdocumentation shouldbereviewedtoverifytheitemslistedintheDocumentReviewChecklist inAppendixB.Therequiredplantdocuments include:1.Annunciator ResponseProcedures 2.Administrative Procedures relevanttoannunciators.
4D~Analslsa.Alldeviations fromthecriteriashallberecordedonHumanEngineering Discrepancy (HED)reports(Appendix B).Recordedinformation shallincludetheinstru-mentorinstruments involved(e.g.,auditoryalarmhorns,specificlighttiles,etc.),adescription oftheproblemincluding the0700paragraph numberofthecriteria, andarecommended solution.
181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983'b.Datacollection method(s) shallalsoberecordedontheHEDform(seeAppendixB).Wheredatafromtwoormoresourcesarecontradictory, resolution oftheconflictthroughdatareviewandclientinterview shallbemade.c.UsetheanalysisaidsfromAppendixBforalldatareduction andanalysis.
Uponcompletion ofallanalyses, ensurethatthecriteriainAppendixAareproperlyannotated (asspecified intheanalysisaids).d.Submitthecompleted taskplantoyourimmediate supervisor forreview.Uponprojectmanagement
- approval, initiateTaskReport3.1.5.0EQUIPMENT ANDFACILITYREQUIREMENTS a4b.coAccesstothecontrolroom.Soundlevelmeter.Protractor andtapemeasure.d.Flashcomparator.
6.0INPUTSANDDATAFORMSa1b.cod.e.Annunciator ResponseProcedures Annunciator Administrative Procedures Completed TaskReportsfor:1.SystemFunctionandTaskAnalysis2.LabelsandLocationAids3.Maintainability CriteriaList(Appendix A)Thefollowing fromAppendixB:l.Measurements DataForms2.Questionnaire 3.Observations Checklist 4.Documentation ReviewChecklist 5.AnalysisAids6.HEDReportFormsf.CriteriaMatrix(Appendix C)g.TaskPlanCritiqueForm(Appendix D) 181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19837.0OUTPUTSANDRESULTSa.CompletedHEDsb.Completed TaskReport.
181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19838.0FIGURESANDTABLESNone.
181ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19839.DPROCEDURE EXCEPTIONS Thefollowing exceptions, deviations, andchangesweremadetotheseprocedures duringconductofthetask(includeastatement ofjustification oneachitem):
ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983APPENDIXACRITERIA ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19836.3.1.1GENERALSYSTEMDESIGNAnnunciator warningsystemsaretheprimarycontrolroominterface toimmediately alerttheoperatortooutof.tolerance changesinplantcon.dition.Annunciator warningsystemsconsistofthreemajorsubsystems:
(a)anauditoryalertsubsystem, (b)avisualalarmsubsystem, and(c)anoperatorresponsesubsystem (seeExhibit6,3-1).Together, thesethreesubsystems shouldbedesignedtoprovideapreferred operational sequenceforannunciator warningsasindicated inExhibit6.32.N/AYESCOMMENTS8.3,12ALARMPARAMETER SELECTION a.b.C.SETPOINTS-The limitsorsetpointsforinitiating theannunciator warningsystemshouldbeestablished tomeetthefollowing goals:(1)Alarmsshouldnotoccursofrequently astobeconsidered anuisancebytheoperators.
(2)However,setpointsshouldbeestablished togiveoperators adequatetimetore-spondtothewarningcondition beforeaseriousproblemdevelops.
GENERALALARMS(1)Alarmsthatrequirethecontrolroomoperatortodirectanauxiliary operatortoagivenplantlocationforspecificinformation shouldbeavoided.(2)Ifgeneralalarmsmustbeused,theyshouldonlybeusedforconditions thatallowadequatetimeforauxiliary operatoractionandsubsequent controlroomoperatoraction,MULTICHANNEL ORSHAREDALARMS(1)Annunciators withinputsfrommorethanoneplantparameter mtpointshouldbeavoided.Multi.inputalarmsthatsummarize single-input annunciators
.elsewhere inthecontrolroomareanexception, (2)Wheremulti-input annunciators mustbeused,analarmprintoutcapability shouldbeprovided.
Thespecifics ofthealarmshouldbeprintedonanalarmtyperwithsufficient speedandbufferstoragetocaptureallalarmdata.
ANNUNC1ATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nlay19836,3,1.2ALARMPAR'AMETER SELECTION (Cont'd)N/AYESHOCONMENTSc.MULTICHANNEL ORSHAREDALARMS(Cont'd)(3)Areflashcapability shouldbeprovidedtoallowsubsequent alarmstoactivatetheauditoryalertmechanism andreflashthevisualtileeventhoughthefirstalarmmaynothavebeencleared.d.MULTI.UNITALARMS-(1)Alarmsforanysharedplantsystemsshouldbeduplicated inallcontrolrooms.(2)Whenanitemofsharedequipment isbeingoperatedfromonecontrolroom,astatusdisplayorsignalshouldbepro.videdinallothercontrolroomswhichcouldpotentially controlthisequipment.
6,3.1.3FIRSTOUTANNUNCIATORS a.REACTORSYSTEM(1)Aseparatefirstoutpanelshouldbeprovidedforthereactorsystem.(2)Thefirstoutpanelshouldconsistofseparateannunciator tilesforeachoftheautomatic reactortripfunctions.
{3)Intheeventofareactortrip,thetileassociated.
withtheeventshouldilluminate, andnoother.b,TURBINE.GENERATOR SYSTEM-Aseparatefirstoutpanel,similarinfunctiontothereactorsystempanel,isrecommended.
c.POSITION-First outpanelsshouldbelocateddirectlyabovethemaincontrolworkstationforthesystem.d.APPLICATION-First outannunciators shouldconformtothegeneralauditory, visual,andoperatorresponseguidelines ofthissection.A-2 ANNUNClATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay19836,3.1.4PRIORITIZATION0.LEVELSOFPRIORITY(1)Prioritization shouldbeaccomplished usingarelatively small(24)numberofprioritylevels.H/AYES'OMMENTS(2)Prioritization shouldbebasedonacontinuum ofimportance,
- severity, orneedforoperatoractioninoneormoredimensions, e.g.,likelihood ofreactortrip,releaseofradiation.
Exhibit6.3-3providesanexampleofprioritization basedonthreelevelsofprioritization.
b,PRIORITYCODING(1)Somemethodforcodingthevisualsignalsforthevariousprioritylevelsshouldbeemployed.
Acceptable methodsforprioritycodingincludecolor,position, shape,orsymboliccoding.(2)Auditorysignalcodingforprioritylevelisalsoappropriate.
SeeGuideline 62.2.3forrecommended codingtechniques.
6.3.1.5CLEAREDALARMSa.AUDITORYSIGNAL-Cleared alarmsshouldhaveadedicated, distinctive audiblesignalwhichshouldbeoffinitedurationb.VISUALSIGNAL-The individual tileshouldhaveoneofthefollowing:
(1)Aspecialflashrate(twiceorone.halfthenormalflashrateispreferred, toallowdiscrimination),
or(2)Reducedbrightness, or(3)Aspecialcolor,consistent withtheoverallcontrolroomcolorcoding scheme,pro-ducedbyadiffeentlycoloredbulbbehindthetile.
ANNUNClATOR SYSTEMTP-3.1IMay19836.3.2.1SIGNALDETECTION N/AYESNOCONTENTSatb,C.INTENSITY-The signalshouldbesuchthatoperators canreliablydiscernthesignalabovetheambientcontrolroomnoise.Anominalvalueof10dB(A)aboveaverageambientnoiseisgenerally
- adequate, CONTROL-Signalintensity, if,adjustable, shouldbecontrolled byadministrative procedure.
LIMITS-Thesignalshouldcapturetheoperator's attention butshouldnotcauseirritation orastartledreaction.
d.DETECTION-Each auditorysignalshouldbeadjustedtoresultinapproximately equaldetection levelsatnormaloperatorworkstationsintheprimaryoperating area.e,RESET-Theannunciator auditoryalertmechanism shouldautomatically resetwhenithasbeensilenced.
f;.IDENTIFICATION-Theoperatorshouldbeabletoidentifytheworkstationorthesystemwheretheauditoryalertsignaforiginated.
Separateauditorysignalsateachworkstationwithintheprimaryoperating areaarerecommended.
6.3.2.2AUDITORYCODINGa.b.LOCALIZATION (1)Auditorycodingtechniques shouldbeusedwhentheoperatorworkstationassociated withthealarmisnotintheprimaryoperating area.(2)Codedsignalsfromasingleaudiosourceshoufdnotbeusedtoidentifyindividual workstationswithintheprimaryoper-atingarea.PRIORITI2ATION-Coding maybeusedtoindicatealarmpriority.
(,".eeGuideline 6.3.1.4.)
A-4 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19836.3.3.1VISUALANNUNCIATOR PANELSLOCATION-Visual alarmpanelsshouldbelocatedabovetherelatedcontrolsanddisplayswhicharerequiredforcorrective ordiagnostic actioninresponse'to thealarm.(SeeExhibit6.34.)b.LABELING~(1)Eachpanelshouldbeidentified byalabelabovethepanel.(2)Panelidentification labelheightshouldbeconsistent withasubtended visualangleofatfeast15minuteswhenviewedfromacentra(positionwithintheprimaryoperating area.YESCOMMENTS6.3.3.2VISUALALARMRECOGANDIDENTa.FLASHING-Thespecifictile(s)onanannun-ciatorpanelshoulduseflashingillumination toindicateanafarrpcondition.
b.FLASHRATE-Flashratesshouldbefromthreetcfiveflashespersecondwithapproxi-matelyequalonandofftimes.c.FLASHERFAILURE-fncaseofflasherfailureofanalarmedtile,thetilelightshouldilluminate andburnsteadily.
d.CONTRASTDETECTABILITY-Thereshouldbehighenoughcontrastbetweenalarmingandsteady.ontiles,andbetweenilluminated andnon-illuminated tiles,sothatoperators inanormallyilluminated controlroomhavenoproblemdiscriminating
- alarming, steadywn, andsteadywff visualtiles.e."DARK"ANNUNCIATOR PANELS-A"dark"annunciator panelconceptshouldbeused.Thismeansthatundernormaloperating conditions noannunciators wouldbeillumi-nated;atlofthevisualtilesoftheannunciator panelswouldbe"dark."EXTENDEDDURATIONILLUMINATION-tfanannunciator tilemustbe"ON"foranextendedperiodduringnormaloperations (e.g.,duringequipment repairorreplacement),
itshouldbe:(1)Distinctively codedforpositiverecog-nitionduringthisperiod,and(2)Controlled byadministrative procedures.
A-5 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19838,3b.C.Cl0~e,,3.3ARRANGEMENT OFVISUALALARMTILESMATRIXORGANIZATION
-Visualalarmsshouldbeorganized asamatrixofvisualalarmtileswithineachannunciator panel.FUNCTIONAL GROUPING-Visual alarmtilesshouldbegroupedbyfunctionorsystemwithineachannunciator panel.Forexample,arearadiation alarmsshouldbegroupedononepanel,notspreadthroughout thecontrolroom.LABELINGOFAXES(1)Theverticalandhorizontal axesofannunciator panelsshouldbelabeledwithalphanumerics forreadycoordinate designation ofaparticular visualtile.(2)Coordinate designation ispreferred ontheleftandtopsidesoftheannunciator panel.(3)Letterheightforcoordinate designation shouldbeconsistent withasubtended visualangleofatleast15minutesasviewedfromacentral,positionwithintheprimaryoperating area.,PATTERNRECOGNITION-(1)Thenumberofalarmtilesandthematrixdensityshouldbekeptlow(amaximumof50tilespermatrixismggested).
(2)Tileswithinanannunciator panelmatrixshouldbegroupedbysubsystem,
- function, orotherlogicalorganization.
OUTNFSERVICEALARMS-Cues forpromptrecognition ofanoutof.service annunciator shouldbedesignedintothesystem.BLANKTILES-Blank orunusedannunciator tilesshouldnotbeilluminated (exceptduringannunciator testing).
N/AYESNOCOMMENTS8.3.3.4VISUALTILELEGENDS~.UNAMBIGUOUS
-Annunciator visualtilelegendsshouldbespecificandunambiguous.
Wordingshouldbeinconcise,shortmessages.
b.SINGULARITY
-Alarmswhichrefertheoperatortoanother,moredetailedannunciator panellocatedoutsidetheprimaryoperating areashouldbeminimized.
A-6 ANNUNClATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19836.3,3.4VISUALTILELEGENDS(Cont'd)c.SPECIFICITY
-Tilelegendsshouldaddressspecificconditions; forexample,donotuseonealarmforHIGH-LOW, TEMPFRATURE-PRESSURE.d.ABBREVIATIONS
-Abbreviations andacro-nymsshouldbeconsistent withthoseusedelsewhere inthecontrolroom.N/AYESNOCOMMENTS6.3.3.5VISUALTILEREADABILITY a.DISTANCE-The operatorshouldbeabletoreadalltheannunciator tilesfromthepositionattheworkstationwheretheannunciator acknowledge controlislocated.(1)Letterheightshouldsubtendaminimumvisualangleof15minutes,or.004xviewingdistance.
Thepreferred visualangleis20minutes,or.006xviewingdlstanceo (2)Letterheightshouldbeidentical foralltiles,basedonthemaximumviewingdistance.
Separatecalculations shouldbemadeforstand.upandsitdownworkstations.
b.TYPESTYLE-The sizeandstyleoflettering shouldmeetthefollowing:
(1)Typestylesshouldbesimple.(2)Typestylesshouldbeconsistent onallvisualtiles.(3)Onlyupper-case typeshouldbeusedonvisualtiles,c.LEGENDCONTRAST-Legends shouldpro-videhighcontrastwiththetilebackground.
(1)Legendsshouldbeengraved.
(2)Legendsshouldbedarklettering onalightbackground.
d.LETTERDIMENSIONS ANDSPACING-(1)Stroke.width.to-cnaracter-height ratioshouldbebetween1:6and1:8.(2)Letterwidth.to-height ratioshouldbebetween1:1and3:5.(3)Numeralwidthto.height ratioshouldbe3:5.A-7 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May19836.3.3.5VISUALTILEREADABILITY (Cont'd)d.LETTERDIMENSIONS ANDSPACING-(Cont'd)(4)Minimumspacebetweencharacters shouldbeonestrokewidth.(5)Minimumspacebetweenwordsshouldbethewidthofonecharacter.
(6)Minimumspacebetweenlinesshouldbeone-halfthecharacter height.N/AYESNOCOMMENTS6.3.4a~>>>>b.:;C.d..1CONTROLS(SeeExhibit6.35.)SILENCE(1)Eachsetofoperatorresponsecontrolsshouldincludeasilencecontrol.(2)Itshould'bepossibletosilenceanauditoryalertsignalfromanysetofannunciator responsecontrolsintheprimaryoperating area.ACKNOWLEDGE (1)Acontrolshouldbeprovidedtoterminate theflashingofavisualtileandhaveitcontinueatsteadyillumination untilthealarmiscleared.(2)Acknowledgement shouldbepossibleonlyattheworkstationwherethealarmoriginated.
RESET(1)Ifanautomatic clearedalarmfeatureisnotprovided, acontrolshouldbepro.videdtoresetthesystemafteranalarmhascleared.(2)Theresetcontrolshouldsilenceanyaudiblesignalindicating clearance andshouldextinguish tileillumination.
(3)Theresetcontrolshouldbeeffective onlyattheworkstationfortheannunciator panelwherethealarminitiated.
TEST(1)Acontroltotesttheauditorysignalandflashingillumination ofalltilesinapanelshouldbeprovided.
(2)Periodictestingofannunciators shouldberequiredandcontrolled byadministrative procedure.
A-8 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983.6.3.4.2CONTROLSETDESIGNa.b.C.6.3.4.3ANNUNCIATOR RESPONSEPROCEDURES POSITIONING OFREPETITIVE GROUPS-Repetitive groupsofannunciator controlsshouldhavethesamearrangement andrelativelocationatdifferent workstations.
Thisistofacilitate "blind"reaching.
CONTROLCODING-Annunciator responsecontrolsshouldbecodedforeasyrecognition, usingtechniques suchas:(1)Colorcoding;(2)colorshadingthegroupofannunciator
'controls; (3)demarcating thegroupofannunciator controls; or(4)shapecoding,particularly thesilencecontrol.(SeeExhibit6.3.5,Example2.)NONDEFEATABLE CONTROLS-Annunci~atorcontroldesignsshouldnotallowtheoperatortodefeatthecontrol.Forexample,somepushbuttons usedforannunciator silencing andacknowledgement canbehelddownbyinserting acoinintheringaroundthe-pushbutton.
Thisundesirable designfeatureshouldbeeliminated.
K/AYESKOCOMMENTSa.AVAILABILITY
-Annunciator responsepro.ceduresshouldbeavailable inthecontrolroom.INDEXING-Annunciator responseprocedures shouldbeindexedbypanelidentification andannunciator tilecoordinates.
6.5.1.6COLORCODINGa.b.~REDUNDANCY-In allapplications ofcolorcoding,colorshouldprovideredundant information.
Thatis,thepertinent information shouldbeavailable fromsomeothercueinadditiontocolor,NUMBEROFCOLORS(1)Thenumberofcolorsusedforcodingshouldbekepttotheminimumneededforprovidngsufficient information.
(2)Thenumberofcolorsusedforcodingshouldnotexceed11.A-9 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19838.5,1.6COLORCODING(Cont'd)c.MEANINGOFCOLORS(I)Themeaningattachedtoaparticular colorshouldbenarrowlydefined.(2)Red,green,andamber(yellow)shouldbereservedforthefollowing uses:Red:unsafe,danger,immediate operatoractionrequired, oranindication thatacriticalparameter isoutoftolerance.
Green:safe,nooperatoractionrequired, oranindication thataparameter iswithintolerance.
Amber(yellow):
hazard(potentially un-safe),caution,attention
- required, oranindication thatamarginalvalueorparameter exists.d.CONSISTENCY OFMEANING(1)Themeaningassignedtoparticular colorsshouldbeconsistent acrossallapplications withinthecontrolroom.(2)Themeaningofaparticular colorshouldremainthesamewhetherappliedtopanelsurfacesorprojected insignallightsoronCR,Ts.N/AYESNOCOMMENTS6.6.6.2DEMARCATIONb.C.USE-Lines ofdemarcation canbeusedto:(1)Enclosefunctionally relateddisplays.
{2)Enclosefunctionally relatedcontrols.
(3)Grouprelatedcontrolsanddisplays.
CONTRAST-Lines ofdemarcation shouldbevisuallydistinctive fromthepanelbackground.
PERMANENCE-Lines ofdemarcation shouldbepermanently attached.
ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983AUDITORYALERTSUBSYSTEM VISUALALARMSUBSYSTEM rOPERATORRESPONSESUBSYSTEM
~~;51i--."""1bExhibit6.3l.Annunciator warningayatern.,
ANNUNC1ATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983lCdenassesn ssceetn~$~A&antAsonsaarc LHHtcNaSsaaedede Iyft~~g~~~~4~idscarywealarsosnaceN nonsaooassseer MCSNon(san)VscssdAnssssKsecor TiltAccsrecson sorest(eysnsddormteesnnsssssnasew eormINUnssnnnl endncensssacc~racenndssraednanccnwcsonSlLSNCS"ControlIleonsnce (AnyMCSLate(seel AyennySsoKSCeeae.nKeenansonAKece"AC@HOWLS OQS"ControlAeowsta(OnlyecIICSLoeecnnNwAsrsssssitsalaseassetIIslaossne ceases.(ssstTiklternasnc Invnssnatad Iss0sedsaesc endAernedsacsan olesotnnnecesscessa+sear(ll Necssrnad toNormoIMeanIersonISssn~~~~~e
~(JsswssaAsses(dry SslnellorClearedANnssp~~~~qVsosdAnnssncsacar TileAetwtw~wSoecselelcerssne denalvssssnTriacolndscece"OwedANnss"nsssr-CarnndN~(OseyceMCSLacenonNwAnssssncsetor ecnn)NoMoleAssceesearVsssMaA4nnTSSlIAtSealsSoearlnAenssKntar CanclnSecLoaetsonl IKlioeMAccessory ANrcsianesendlsleaneeANvsosnTilessnNdendAnsnnsesecor eorm(slLSOSNOQQ~SessosneK Actsang+g~oaeeccssr Acean~Aecdsceceassdessn~Exhibit6.3.2.Annunciator systempreferred operational sequence.
A-12 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENTP-3.11Nay1983PIRSTPRIORITYALARMS~Plantshutdownlraectortrip,turbinetrip)~Radiation release~Plantconditions which,lfnotcorrected immediately, willresultinautomatic plantshutdownorradi~tionralaae.orwillrequitemanualplantshutdown.
SECONDPRIORITYALARMS~Technical
~ificetion violations whichifnotcorrected willrequireplantShutdown~Plantconditions which.Ifnotcorrected, meySaadtoplantshutdownorradiation releasesTk(ROPRIORITYALARMS~plantconditions reoresantina problemsie9'ystŽdaeredationI whicheffectplantooarability butwhichshouldnotleadtoplantshutdovm, radiation release.orviolation oftechnical xsecifications Exhibit6.33.ThreelevelannUnciator prioritization example.ecctnas'rsa corrteotaasissVISUALALARMSW<<&<<<<8'sita<<i~isa'aIst~Grwtsaior sISita<<otHtsai
~'st~OINISaOl<<IIRELATEDDISPLAYSgi>liaur~>ac'rtoartsau<<rsRli<<irttoarts~HlElRELATEDCDNTRQLSCIIExhibit6.M.Vistralalarmslocatedabovethcrelatedcontrolsanddisplays.
(FromSeminaraetai.,1979).A-13 ANNUNClATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay19B3E'xample1SILENCEACKNOWLEDGE Example2::::::ANNUNCIATOR CONTROLS::::::
- SILENCE.::.ACKRESETTESTRESETTESTExhibit6.35.Annunciator responsecontrols.
ColorSerialOr<<eleetrOn numberGeneralcolornameISCCNBS/rtunsett renotetron olcolor.centroidnameISCC4<<SSCentroidnumberlaboraviation)
Color123456789101112131415'l6171819202122whiteblackyellowpurOleoreneelightblueredbullOrevcreenpurplishpinkblueyellawieh pinkvioletoranceyellowpurplishredare<<nishyellowreddishbrownyellowcreenyellOwith brOwnreddishor<<nileOliveareen253257822184818011902651392471782620756255974011575126Whiteblackv.Y~.Pv.Ov.l.dv.Rey.YmedGyv.G<<,pPk<<,8<<,yPk<<.Vv.OY<<.oRv.aYa.rBrv.YGdecoyBrv.rOd,OIG2.5PB9.5/0.2NOdr3.3Y8.0/14.35.5P4.3/9,24,1YR5.5/1502.7P87.9I6,05,OR3.9/1544.4Y7.2/3.83.3GY5.4IO13.2G4.9/11.15BRP6.8/9.02.9PB4.1/104S.4R7.0/9.50.2P3.7/10.18.6YR7.3/15.27.3RP4.4/11,49.1Y8.2/12.00,3YR3.1/9.96.4GY6.8/11.2B,BYR3.l/5.094RS.4/14,5B.0GY2.2/3.6Exhibit6.57.Twentytwocolorso(maximumcontrast(tramKelly,1965).A-14 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983APPENDIXBDATAFORMS ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENAPPENDIX8DATAFORMSTP-3.11May1983TABLEOFCONTENTSBl-MEASUREMENT, DATAFORMSBl.lLinearMeasurements 81.2SoundMeasurements 81.3LightMeasurements 82-OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 83-OBSERVATION CHECKLIST 84-DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST 85-ANALYSISAIDS85.1LinearMeasurements Analysis85.2SoundMeasurementsAnalysis85.3LightMeasurements Analysis86-OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS87-OBSERVATION CHECKLIST ANALYSIS88-DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST ANALYSIS89-SAMPLEHEDREPORTFORM~Pae81.1-181.1-181.2-181.3-182-183-184-185'-185.1-185.2-185.3-186-187-188-189-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXBl.lMEASUREMENTS DATATP-3.11May19831.LINEARMEASUREMENTS (LABELING) 1.1Annunciator LightBox(ALB)SummaryLabels-6.3.3.1b(2).
a.Iftherearenosummarylabels,checkhere:b.Iftherearesummarylabels,measureandrecordinTablel.lbthefollowing information:
ITEMNO.1)2)3)4)5)6)ITEMDESCRIPTION Character heightCharacter widthand/ornumeralwidthCharacter strokewidth Character spacingWordspacingLinespacingTABLE1~lbITEMALB-ALB-ALB-ALB-ALB-ALB-ALB-2.3.4.6~1.2TileLabeling-6.3.3.5a(l) anda(2),and6.3.5.5d(1) throughd(6).a,MeasureandrecordinTable1.2athecharacter height(s) usedinthetiles.Ifmorethanonesizecharacter isused,recordtheheightforalloftherepresented heights.Alsomeasureandrecordthefarthestleftandfarthestrighttilefromitsassociated acknowledge stationforeachoftherepresented character heights(startattheleftmostacknowledge stationandnumberthestationsgoingclockwise aroundtheMCB).
APPENDIXBl.lMEASUREMENTS DATA~I'J~J1Nay19831.2(Cont.)TABLE1.2aSTA1STA2STA3STA4STA5CHARHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTb.Foreachacknowledge stationinthetableabove,measureandrecordinTable1.2btheheightfromthefloorforthefarthestleftandfarthestrighttilefromthissametable.TABLE1.2bTILEHEIGHTFROMFLOORCHARHTSTA1STA2STA3STA4STA5Bl.l-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB1.1MEASUREMENTS DATATP-3.11May19B3c.Measureandrecordthefollowing foreachofthedifferent character heightsfroma,above:TABLE1.2cCHAR/NUMHT(ref)WIDTHSTROKEWIDTHCHARSPACINGWORDSPACINGLINESPACING1.3DataReduction andAnalysis.
Fordatareduction andanalysis, obtaintheappropriate analysisaidsfromAppendixB5(ref.B5.1).B1.1-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB1.2MEASUREMENTS DATA'P-3.11Hay19832.SOUNDMEASUREMENTS (AUDIBLESIGNALS)2.1Annunciator AudibleAlarms-6.3.2.1a.
MeasurethesoundlevelindB(A)foreachannunciator audiblealarmateachofthefollowing operatorpositions:
TABLE2ALARMLOCATIONMCBSAFETYSYSTEMSPOS1POS2CONTTURBELECRADMONOP'SGENDISTCONSOLEDESK2.3.4,5.2.2DataReduction andAnalysis.
Fordatareduction andanalysis, obtaintheappropriate analysisaidsfromAppendixB5(ref.B5.2).B1~2-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB1.3MEASUREMENTS DATA3.LIGHTMEASUREMENTS (TILEFLASHCHARACTERISTICS)
-6.3.5b(l) and6.3.3.2b3.1UsingtheFlashComparator, measuretheflashrateoftilesinalarmandinclear,Recordtherates.AlarmFlashRate:ClearedFlashRate:3.2UsingtheFlashComparator, measuretheon-offratioforthealarmflashrateandclearedflashrate.On-OffRatio(Alarm):On-OffRatio(Cleared):
B3.1-1 ANNONCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983APPENOIX82OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS 1.Thefollowing arequestions concerning thegenerallayout,functional organization, andoperational considerations inyourcontrolroom.Hostofthequestions willrequireaYESorNOanswer,withsomeadditional information.
02.Whenyouhavecommentsorsuggestions, usethespaceprovidedbeloweachquestion.
If.youneedadditional room,usethebacksofthesheets.3.Ifyoudonotunderstand aquestion, pleaseaskthemonitorforclarification.
4.Pleaseanswerallofthequestions ascompletely aspossible.
5.Takeasmuchtimeasyouneedtocompletethequestionnaire.
6.Allofyouranswers,andyourbiographical information, willbekeptinthestrictest confidence andwillbeusedtoaidinthe'erformance ofthedetailedcontrolroomdesignreview.PLEASEBEGIN82-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERYIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE
'BIOGRAPHICAL DATA:Name:Age:Sex:Height:Weight:CurrentPosition/Title:
1.Doyouhaveacurrentreacto~operator's license'?
YESNO2.Amountoflicensedexperience atthisplant:3.Totalamountlicensedexperience:
4.Relatedexperience andamount(example:
operator-trainee, HodgeNPPUnit1,1yr.):5.'ducation:
a.Highestlevelattained:
beSpecialized Schoolsorcourses(list):6.Militaryexperience:
B2-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE l.Doyouhaveafirstoutannunciator panelwhereonlythetileassoc-iatedwiththereactortripeventilluminates andall'subsequent alarmsonthatpanelare"lockedout"?YESNO2.Doyou'knowofanyautomatic reactortripfunctions thatdonothaveaseparateannunciator tileonthefirstoutpanel(eithermissingorsharedwithotherfunctions)?
YESNO3.Aretheannunciator panelsinthecontrolroomidentified byalabelaboveeachpanel?YESNO4.Fromyourprimaryoperating area,canyoureadallannunciator panellabelswithaminimumofeffort?YESNO5.Istheannunciator systemprioritycodedbycolor,position, shape,orsymboliccodingofthetiles?YESNO6.Doesyourannunciator systemusecolorcoding?YESNO7.Aretheremorethanelevencolorsusedforcodingthepanels?YESNOB2-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE B.Isthereastandardmeaningattachedtothecolorsusedforcodingthepanels?YESNO9.Isthecolorredeverusedforacondition otherthanunsafe,danger,immediate operatoractionrequired, orasanindication thatacriticalparameter isoutoftolerance?
YESNO10.Isthecolorgreeneverusedforacondition otherthansafe,nooperatoractionrequired, orasanindication thataparameter iswithintolerance?
YESNO1'l..Isthecoloramber(yellow)everusedforacondition otherthanhazard(potentially unsafe),caution,attention required,orasanindication thatamarginalvalueorparameter exists?YESNO12.Doyouknowofanyunnecessary colorcodingontheannunciator panels?YESNO13.Doyouknowofanycolorsthatarenotusedconsistently acrossallapplications withinthecontrolroom,frompanel-to-panel orinsignallightsandonCRTs?YESNOB2-4 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 14.Areauditorysignalsprioritycodedbypulse,frequency change(warbling),
intensity, ordifferent frequencies fordifferent signals?YESNO15.Ifyouhaveseparatealarmhorns,canyoueasilyidentifytheworkstationorsystemwheretheauditorysignaloriginated?
YESNO16.Doyouhavedifferent alarmhornsforworkareasnotatthemaincontrolboard?YESNO17.Iftheauditoryalarmsignalhasonlyonesource,isthesoundcodedtodirectyoutodifferent workareas?YESNOII18.Doanyofthealarmhornsstartleorirritateyou?YESNO19.Ifyouhavedifferent alarmhorns,doanyofthemsoundtooloudortoosoftincomparison totheothersatyournormalworkstation?YESNO20.Doyouhaveasilencecontrolwitheachsetofresponsecontrolsinyourprimaryoperating area'?YESNOB2-5 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIX82OPERATORINTERVIEM/QUESTIONNAIRE 21.Isacontrolprovidedwhichterminates aflashingvisualtile,butallowsasteadyillumination untilthealarm'iscleared'YESNO22.Canyouacknowledge analarmfrommorethanoneresponsecontrolarea?YESNO23.Ifclearedalarmsdonotresetautomatically, doyouhaveacontroltoresetthemyou'rself?YESNO24.Doestheresetcontrolsilencetheauditorysignalaswellasextin-guishtheillumination?
YESNO25.Doestheresetcontroloperatefrommorethanoneresponsecontrolarea?YESNO26.Canyoudefeatanyoftheannunciator
- controls, suchaslockingouttheaudiblealarmorlockingdowntheacknowledge control?YESNO27.Canyoutesttheauditoryandflashingillumination signalsofalltilsforeachpanel?YESNOB2-6 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEM/QUESTIONNAIRE 28.Isthereanadministrative procedure thatcontrolstheperiodictestingofallannunciators?
YESNO29.Arealltilesdarkonannunciator panelswhennoalarmisindicated?
YESNO30.Canyoueasilytellifatileisnormallyonforanextendeddura-tionduringnormaloperating conditions?
YESNO31.Areyouimmediately awareifanannunciator tileisoutofservice?YESNO32.Canyouimmediately determine whentheflasherofanalarmtilefails?YESNO33.Doyouknowofanyalarmsthatoccursofrequently thatyouconsiderthemanuisance?
YESNOB2-7 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983APPENDIX82OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 34.Doyouknowofanyalarmsthatdonotgiveyouampletimetorespondtoawarningcondition?
YESNO35.Whenresponding toanalarmtile,canyoureadilylocatethecontrolsanddisplaysrequiredforcorrective ordiagnostic action?YESNO36.Doyouhaveaccesstoannunciator responseprocedures inthecontrolroom?YESNO37.Doyouknowofanyalarmswhichrequireyoutoobtainadditional infor-mationfromasourceoutsideofthecontrolroomarea?YESNO38.Aretheretoomanyalarmswhichrequireadditional information frompanelsoutsideyouroperating area?YESNO82-8 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 39.Ifalarmsareusedthatrequireinformation outsidethecontrolroom,dotheyallowyouampletimetorespond'YESNO40.Arealarmsprovidedforsharedequipment inallcontrolrooms?YESNO4l.Isthereastatusdisplayorsignalprovidedforsharedequipment inallcontrolroomswhichindicates thattheequipment iscurrently beingoperated?
YESNO42.DoyouhaveanytileswithdualmessagessuchasHIGH-LOW?
YESNO43.Doesthemulti-input alarmhaveareflashcapability thatreflashesthevisualtileafteranauditoryalertevenifthefirstalarmhasnotbeencleared?YESNOB2-9 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENTP-3.11Nay19B3APPENDIXB2OPERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE 44.Domulti-input annunciators provideyouwithanalarmprintout?
YESNO45.Doesthemulti-input alarmtyperhavesufficient speedtoprintthealarmdatafastenoughforyourneeds?YESNO46.Doesthealarmtypereverskiporlooseinformation, orgarble(mixup)theprinting?
YESNOB2-10 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB3OBSERYATIONS CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS l.Usingtheattachedchecklist, makeallthenotedobservations.
2.Recordallnecessary information inthecommentscolumntojustifyanN/AcheckandtodetailaNOcheck.3.InsurethatallcommentsforNOchecksincludecomponent, instrument, panel,equipment, etc.identification andlocationinformation.
4.InitiateHEDreportsonallNOchecksperthedirections contained inthechecklist analysisaids.83-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS.
1.Aseparatefirstoutpanelshouldbeprovidedforthereactorsystem-6.3.1.3a(1).
2.Aseparatefirstoutpanelisrecommended fortheturbine-generator systemthatisfunc-tionallysimilartothereactorsystempanel-6.3.1.3b.
3.Firstoutpanelsshouldbe,locatedabovetheirmainwork,.stations-6.3.1.3c.
.,4.Allfirstoutpanelsshouldconformtothegeneralauditoryandvisualitemsintherestofthischecklist
-6.3.1.3d.
5.Asmallnumber(2-4)oflevelsofprioritycodingareused-6.3.1.4a(l).
6.Prioritycodingofcolor,posi-tion,shape,orsymbolisusedfor.visualsignals-6.3.1.4b(1).
B3-2 ANNUNCIATORSYSTENAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.1"1Nayl983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS7.Auditorysignalprioritycodingmaybeused-6.3.1.4b(2).
8.Ifmorethanone,eachaudi-torysignalshouldsoundatapproxi-matelyequalloudnessatnormalwork.tations intheprimaryopera-tingarea-6.3.2.ld.
9.Anauditorysignalshouldcapturetheoperator's attention butshouldnotirritateorcauseastartledreaction-6.3.2.1c.
10.Separateauditorysignalsateachworkstationwithinthepri-maryoperating areaarerecom-mended-6D.2.1f.ll.Theoperatorshouldbeabletoidentifytheworkstationorareawheretheauditoryalertorigi-nated-6.3.2.lf.
12.Theauditorysignalshouldautomatically resetwhensilenced-6.3.2.le.
B3"3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS13.Whenanalarmclears(oriscleared)thereshouldbeadedi-cated,distinctaudiblesignalwithafiniteduration-6.3.1.5a.
14.Auditoryalertsignal(s),
ifadjustable, shouldbecontrolled byadministrative procedure-6.3.2.1b.
15.Thespecifictitle(s)inanALB'shouldvisuallyflashtoindicateanalarmcondition
-6.3.3.2a.
16.Incaseofflasherfailure,analarmingtileshouldilluminate andburnsteadily-6.3.3.2c.
17.Contrastbetweentilesshouldpresentnoproblemdiscriminating betweenalarming, steady-on, andsteady-off conditions
-63.3.2d.B3-4 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIZB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST N/AYESCOMMENTSTP-3.11May198318.Undernormal(nonalarmed) conditions noannunciator tilesshouldbeilluminated
-6.3.3.2e.
19.Ifatilemustbeonforanextendedperiodduringnormaloperations itshouldbedistinc-tivelycodedforpositiverecog-nitionduringthisperiod(seealso6.3.3.2f(2),
item2contheDocumentReview.Checklist)-
6.3.3.2f(1).
20.Clearedtilesshouldhaveeitheraspecialflashrate,areducedbrightness, oraspecialcolor-6.3.1.5b(l) throughb(3).21.Alltilesassociated withagivenacknowledge controlshouldbereadablewhenoperating thatcontrol-6.3.3.5a.
22.Character styleonalltilesshouldbesimple-63.3.5b(l).
23.Character styleshouldbeconsistent onalltiles-63.3.5b(2).
B3-5 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM,'PPENDIX B3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS24.Character styleshouldbeuppercase onalltiles-6.3.3.5b(3).
25.Tilelegendsshouldhavehighcontrastwiththetilebackground-6.3.3.5c.
26.Tilelegendsshouldbeengraved-6.3.3.5c(1).
27.Tilelegendsshouldbedarkandopaqueonalightandtrans-lucentbackground
-6.3.3.5c(2).
28.Tilelegendsshouldbespecific, unambiguous, concise,andshort-6.3.3.4a.
29.Tilelegendsshouldaddressspecificconditions, HIGHTEMP,orLOWPRESS,notHIGH-LOWTEMP-PRESS
-6.33.4c.B3-6 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB3-OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11Nay1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS30.Abbreviations andacronymsinlegendsshouldbeconsistent withthoseinotherlabelinginthecon-trolroom-6.3.3.4d.
31.Tilesshouldbeorganized asamatrixwithineachALB-6.3.3.3a.
32.Theverticalandhorizontal axesoftheALBsshouldbealpha-numerically labeledfortiledesig-nationcoordinates
-6.3.3.3c(l).
33.Coordinate designators arepreferred attheleftandtopsidesoftheALBs-6.3.3.3c(2).34.Character heightforthecoordinate labelsshouldbethesameheightasthoseusedintilelegends-63.3.3c(3).
35.ThenumberoftilesinanALBshouldbekeptlow,withamaxi-mumof50tilesperALBsuggested
-63.3.3d(1).
B3-7 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM,APPENDIX83.OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST N/AYESNOCOMMENTSTP-3.11May198336.Cuesforpromptrecognition ofanout-of-service annunciator shouldbedesignedintothesystem-6.33.3e.37.Blankorunusedtilesshouldnotbeilluminated exceptduringannunciator testing-6.3.3.3f.
,38.Demarcation linesmaybeusedtoenclosefunctionally
'elatedtitles-6.6.6.2a(l).
,.39.Demarcation linesmaybeusedtogrouptileswiththeirrelatedcontrolsand/ordisplays-6.6.6.2a(l) througha(3).40.Ifused,demarcation linesshouldbevisuallydistinctive fromthepanelbackground
-6.6.6.2b.
41.Ifused,demarcation linesshouldbepermanently attached-6.6.6.2c.
83-8 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS42.ALBsshouldbelocatedabovethecontrolsanddisplaysrequiredforcorrective ordiagnostic actionwhentheyalarm-6.3.3.la.
43.EachALBshouldbeidentified byalabeldirectlyaboveit-6.3.3.lb(1).44.Eachsetofannunciator controlsshouldincludeasilencecontrol-6.3.4.1a(1).
45.Anacknowledge controlshouldbeprovidedthatterminates theflashingandcausesthetiletocontinuously illuminate untilithascleared-6.3.4.lb(1).
46.Ifanautomatic clearedalarmfeatureisnotprovided, acontrolshouldbeprovidedtoresetthesystemafteranalarmhascleared-6.3.4.1c(1).
B3-9 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB3OBSERVATIONS CHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS47.Acontroltotesttheauditoryalarmandtheflashingillumination ofalltilesinapanel(i.e.,inoneormoreALBs)shouldbeprovided-6.>.4.1d(1).
48.Repetitive groupsofannun-ciatorcontrolsshouldhavethesamearrangement andrelativelocationatdifferent workstations-6.3.4.2a.
49.Annunciator controlsshouldbe'codeddifferently thanotherpanelcontrolseitherbycolor,demarca-'tion,orshape-6.3.4.2b(1) throughb(4).50.Shapecodingispreferred forthesilencecontrol-6.3.4.2b(4).
51.Annunciator controldesignsshouldnotallowtheoperatortodefeatthecontroloperation suchasinserting acoinintoacontrolguardring<<6.3.4.2c.
52.Annunciator responseproce-duresshouldbeavailable inthecontrolroom-6.3.4.3a.
B3-10 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXB4DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS Collectthefollowing documents andreviewthemfortheinformation contained intheattachedchecklist:
l.Administrative Procedures concerning annunciators 2.Annunciator ResponseProcedures 3.Resultsfromthefollowing taskreports:a.Convention Surveyb.SystemFunctionTaskAnalysis'c.LabelingSurvey4.InsurethatallcommentsforNOchecksincludecomponent, instrument, panel,equipment, etc.identification andlocationinformation.
5.InitiateHEDreportsonallNOchecksperthedirections contained inthechecklistanalysisaids.B4-I ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENAPPENDIXB4DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST N/AYESNOCOMMENTSTP-3.11May1983l.ANNUNCIATOR RESPONSEPROCEDURES a.Responseprocedures shouldbeindexedbypanelI.D.andtilecoordinates
-6.>.4.3bb.Thereshouldbenoalarmsthatrequiretheoperatortodirectanauxiliary operatoroutsidethecon-trolroomtoobtainmorespecificinformation
-6.3.1.2b(1).
c.Annunciators withinputsfrom~.morethanoneplantparameter set-pointshouldbeavoided(multi-inputalarmsthatsummarize
..single-input alarmselsewhere inthecontrolroomareanexcep-tion)-63.1.2c(l) 2.PLANTADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES a.Periodictestingofannunci-atorsshouldberequiredandcon-trolledbyadministrative pro-cedures-66.4.ld(2).
b.Ifaudiblealarmintensity isoperator-adjustable, itshouldbecontrolled byadministrative procedures
-6.3.2.1b.
B4-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIX84DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTSPLANTADMINPROCESS(cont)c.Whenannunciator tilesmustbeonforanextendedperiodduringnormaloperations, itshouldbecontrolled byadministrative pro-cedures(seealso6.3.3.2f(1),
item19ontheObservations Check-list)-6.5.3.2f(2).
CONVENTIONS TASKREPORTa.Colormeaningsshouldnotbetheonlymeansforidentifying
~pertinent information, thatis,allcolorcodingusedshouldberedundant information
-6.5.1.6a.
b.Thenumberofcolorsusedforcodingshouldbekepttothemini-mumneededtoprovidesufficient information andshouldnotexceed11-6.5.1.6b(1) andb(2).c.Colormeaningsshouldbenarrowlydefined-6.5.1.6c(1).,
d.Redshouldmeanunsafe,danger,immediate operatoractionrequired, oranindication thatacriticalparameter isoutoftoler-ance-6.5.1.6c(2).
Itisimportant tonotethatinonesense,astrictinterpretation of84-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB4DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST TP-3.11May1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTSCONVENTIONS TR(Cont)thisstatement wouldmeanthatastandard, andbroadlyappliedconvention inthenuclearindustrywasincorrect.
However,keepinmindthatflowingelectricity (closedbreakers),
flowingwaterorsteam(runningpumpsandopen'alves),
andanactivereactorcanbeconsidered inherently lesssafethanashutofforshutdowncondi"ion.e.Greenshouldmeansafe,shutoff,shutdown,nooperatoractionrequired, oranindication thata'parameter iswithintolerance-6.5.1.6c(2).
f.Amberoryellowshouldmeanahazard,potentially unsafe,caution,attention
- required, oranindication thatamarginalvalueor.parameter exists-6.5.1.6c(2).
g.Meaningsassignedtoapartic-ularcolorshouldbeconsistent acrossallcontrolroomappli-cationsregardless ofwhetheritisoriapanelsurface,inindicator lightsorinCRTs-6.5.1.6d(l) and(2).h.Abbreviations andacronymsshouldbeconsistent acrosscontrolroomapplications
-6.3.>.4d.
B4"4 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENOIXB4DOCUHENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST TP-3.11Hay1983N/AYESNOCOMMENTS4.SFTATASKREPORTa,Theannunciator warningsys-temshouldbedesignedasthepri-maryalertinginterface withtheoperatorforout-of-tolerance con-ditions.Itshouldconsistofthreemajorsubsystems:
auditoryalert,visualalarm,andoperatorresponse.
Thesethreesubsystems shouidfunctiontoprovideapre-feredoperational sequenceforannunciator warnings-6.3.1.1.b.Visualalarmtilesshouldbegroupedbyfunction, system,sub-system,orotherlogicalorgani-zationwithinALBs-6.3.3.3bandd',2).c.Prioritization ofannunciators shouldbebasedonacontinumofimportance,
- severity, orneedforoperatoractioninoneormoredimensions suchas,thelikelihood ofareactortriporthelikelihood ofareleaseofradiation-6.3.1.4a(2).
d.Tilelegendsshouldaddressspecificconditions ratherthanarangeofconditions and/orparam-eters.Asanexample,separatetilesshouldbeusedtoindicatetemperature-low, temperature-high,pressure-low, andpressure-high,ratherthanasingletilewiththelegendHIGH-LOWTEMP-PRESS-6.3.34c.B4-5 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983APPENDIX85.1MEASUREMENTS ANALYSIS11.LINEARMEASUREMENTS (LABELING) 1.1ALBSummaryLabels-6.3.3.l.b(2) a.'Iftherearenosummarylabels,checkN/Aforcriterion 6.3.3.l.b(2) inAppendixA.b.Iftherearesummarylabels,calculate thevisualangelsforeachlabelfortheoperatorpositions listedinTablel.lbTablel.lbSAFETYSYSTEMSIDENTPOS1POS2MCBREACTURBELECRADMONOP'SCONTGENDISTCONSOLEDESK2,3.5.7.Calculations (useextrasheets,asneeded):B5.1-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIX85.lMEASUREMENTS ANALYSISTP-3.11Nay1983c.IfallvisualanglesinTable1.1bare15minutesofarcorgreater,checkYESforcriterion 6.3.3.1b(2) inAppendixA.d.IftherearevisualanglesinTablel.lblessthan15minuesofarc,recordonanHEDreportformtheposition(s) andlabel(s)wherethisisso.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.1B5.1.1 indatacollection description.
Forcriterion 6.3.3.1b'(2) inAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDreportnumberandthecodenumber,TP-3.1B5.1.1 intheCOMMENTScolumn1.2TileLabels-6.3.3.5a(1) andd(1)throughd(6).a.Calculate thevisualanglesforeachcharacter heightatitsfarthestleftandfarthestrightlocationforeachworkstation inTable1.2a,below.TABLE1.2aALBNO/STA1STA2STA3STA4STA5CHARHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTLEFTRIGHTCalculations (useextrasheets,asrequired):
85.1-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENAPPENDIXB5.1MEASUREMENTS ANALYSISTP-3.11May1983b.IfallvisualanglesinTable1.2aare15minutesofarcorgreater,checkYESforcriterion 6.3.3.5a(l) inAppendixA.c.IfanyvisualanglesinTable1.2aarelessthan15minutesofarc,recordonanHEDreportformtheposition(s) andtilelegend(s) wherethisisso.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.1B5,1.2 inthedatacollection description.
Forcriterion 6.3'.5a(1)inAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDreportnumberandthecodenumber,TP-3.1B5.1.2, intheCOMMENTScolumn.d.Comparethecharacter dimensions andlegendmeasurements foreachcharacter heightrecordedwithcriteria6.3.3.5d(1) throughd(6).e.Ifallcharacterheightsandlegendsmeetthecriteria, checktheYEScolumnforthesecriteriainAppendixA.f.Ifanycharacter dimensions orlegendmeasurements failtomeetthecriteria, recordonanHEDreportformthetilecoordinates, character heightimplicated, andadescri'ption ofthefailure.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.1B5.1.2in'thedatacollection description..Forcriteria6.3.3.5d(1) throughd(6)inAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDreportnumberandthecodenumberTP-3.1B5.1
~2,intheCOMMENTScolumn.B5.1-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB5.2MEASUREMENTS ANALYSISTP-3.11May19832.SOUNDMEASUREMENTS (AUDIBLESIGNALS)2.1Annunciator AudibleAlarms-6.3.2.la.a.Obtaintheaverage.ambientnoiselevelindb(A)fromtheAmbientNoiseSurveyTaskReport(TR-1.6)and'record below:Averagenoiselevel:db(A)b.Baseduponthebelowadjustment factors,reduceeachmeasuredannunciator alarmlevelandrecordinTable2.1b.ABSOLUTEDIFFERENCE BETWEENMEASUREDLEVEL(Lm)ANDAVERAGENOISELEVELLn5678910ll12131415SUBTRACTTHISAMOUNTFROMMEASUREDLEVEL(Lm)ANDANDRECORDINTABLE2.lb2.21.71.31.0.8.6.4.3.3.2.2.1TABLE2.1bALARMLOCATIONMCBSAFETYSYSTEMSPOS1POS2CONTTURBELECRADMONOP'SGENDISTCONSOLEDESK2.3.4.5.85.2-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB5.2MEASuREMENT ANALYSISTP-3.11May1983c.ComparealladjusteddB(A)levelsinTable2.1btotheaveragenoiselevel.d.Ifalladjustedaudiblealarmlevelsareatleast10dB(A)abovetheaveragenoiselevelchecktheYEScolumnforcriterion 6.3.2.1ainAppendixADe.Ifanyadjustedalarmlevelsarelessthan10dB(A)abovetheaveragenoiselevel,recordeachoccurance onanHEDreportform.Include"the codenumberTP3.lB5.2.1 inthedatacollection description.Forcriterion 6.3.2.1ainAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDreportnumberandthecodenumber,TP3.1B5.2.1 intheCOMMENTScolumn.B5.2-2 AxeuxCIATOR SYSTD1APPENDIX85.3MEASUREMENT ANALYSISTP-3.11May19833.LIGHTMEASUREMENTS (TILEFLASHCHARACTERISTICS) 3.1AlarmedFlashCharacteristics
-6.3.3.2b.
a.Fromtherecordeddata,determine ifthealarmedflashrateisbetween3to5flashespersecondandthattheon-offratioisapproximately 1:1.b.Ifbothparameters meetthecriteria, checktheYEScolumnforcriterion 6.3.3.2binAppendixA.c.Ifeitherparameter failstomeetthecriteria, recordthediscrepancy onanHEDreportform.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.185.3.1 inthedatacollection description.
Forcriterion 6,3.3.2bin'Appendix AchecktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDnumberandthecodenumber,TP-3.185.3.1, intheCOMMENTScolumn.3.2ClearedFlashRate-6.3.1.5b(1).
a.Fromtherecordeddata,determine iftheclearedflashrateisapproximately doubleorQthealarmedflashrate.b.Iftheclearedflashratepassesthecriterion, checktheYEScolumnforcriteria6.3.1.5b(l) inAppendixA.c.Iftheclearedflashratefailstomeetthecriterion, recordthediscrepancy onanHEDreportform.IncludethecodenumberTP-3.185.3.2 inthedatacollection discription.
Forcriterion 6.3.1.5b(1) inAppendixA,checktheNOcolumnandrecordtheHEDnumberandthecodenumber,TP-3.185.3.2, intheCOMMENTScolumn.85.3-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIXB6OPERATORINTERYIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSISTP-3.11Nay1983l.GENERALa.Reviewallquestionnaires forcompleteness ofbiographical information andquestionresponses.
b.Deleteincomplete andunusablequestionnaires fromthedatabase.Ifrequiredbycontract, re-schedule thesequestion-nairesforcorrection/completeness.
c.Whenthedatabaseassemblyiscompleteperformtheanaylsis, below.(2.BIOGRAPHICAL DATAa.Assemblebiographical dataanddetermine rangesanddistribu-tionsforallrelevantdimensions.
b.Usingappropriate statistics, determine thedistribution (oritsapproximation)forthisdata.3.RESPONSEDATAa.Summarize allresponses anddetermine percentfrequency responseforeachnegativeanswer.b.Foreachnegativeanswer,initiatePreliminar'y HEDs(PHEDs)fordiscrepancy" review.Recordfrequency'data, responsequestionnumberanddatacollection codenumberoneachPHED.Codenumbersaredeveloped asfollows:(SeeList3bforcriteria}
Example;TaskPlanNumberAppendixTP-3.1B6.10 questionNumberc.SubmitallPHEDstoyourimmediate supervisor.
d.Subsequent verification, validation anddisposition ofallPHEDswillbeconducted perTP-10.1(HEDReviewProcedure).
B6-1 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIX86'PERATORINTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSISTP-3.11Nay19831,6.3.1.3a(3) 2.6.3.1.3a{2) 3~6.3.3.1b(1) 4,6.3.3.1b(2) 5.6.3.1.4b(1)
LIST3b20.6.3.4.1a(1)
&(2)21.6.3.4.1b(1) 22.6.3.4.1b(2) 23.6.3.4.1c(l)
,24.6.3.4.1c(2) 40.6.3.1.2d(l)41.6.3.1.2d(2)42.6.3.3.4c43.6.3.1.2c(3) 44.6.3.1.2c(2) 6.6.5.1.6b(l) 7.6.5.1,6b(2) 8.6.5,1.6c(l) 9~6.5.1.6c(2) 10.6.5.1.6G(2) 11.6.5.1.6G(2) 12.6.5.1.6b(1) 13.6.5.1.6d(1)&(2) 14.6.3.1.4b(2)&
6.3.2.2b15.6.3.2.1f16.6.3.2.2a(1) 17.6.3.2.2a(2) 18.6.3.*2.lc 19.6.3.2.1d25.26.27.28.24.30.31.32.33.34.35.36.37.38.39.6.3.4.1c(3) 6.3.4.2c6.3.4.1d(1) 6.3.4.ld(2) 6.3.3.2e6.3.3.2f6.3.3.3e6.3.3.2c6.3'.2a{1)6.3.1.2a(2) 6,3.3.la6.3.4.3a6.3.1.2b(1) 6.3.3.4b6.3.1.2b(2) 45.6.3.1.2c(2) 46.6.3.1.2c(2) 86-2 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM'PPENDIXB7OBSERVATION CHECKLIST ANALYSISTP-3.11May19831.Foreach.checklist itemcheckedNO,initiateanHEDreport.EntertheHEDreportnumberintheCOMMENTScolumnofthechecklist forthatitem.Includeallnecessary information ontheHEDreportconcerning identification ofthediscrepancy andthecriteria(checklist item)notmet.2.'nterthefollowing codenumberinthedatacollection description:
TP-3.1B3.n Checklist ItemNumber3.Findtheappropriate criterion orcriteriainAppendixAfromthereference numberinthechecklist item.ChecktheNOcolumnandentertheHEDnumberandthedatacollection codenumberintheCOMMENTScolumnforthatcriterion orcriteria.
87-1 IdANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMAPPENDIX88DOCUMENTATION REVIEWCHECKLIST ANALYSISTP-3.11Nay19831.Foreachchecklist itemcheckedNO,initiateanHEDreport.EntertheHEDreportnumberintheCOMMENTScolumnofthechecklist forthatitem.,Includeallnecessary information ontheHEDreportconcerning identification ofthediscrepancy andthecriteria.(checklist item)notmet.2.Enterthefollowing codenumberinthedatacollection description:
TP-3.184.n Checklist ItemNumber3.Findtheappropriate criterion orcriteriainAppendixAfromthereference numberinthechecklist item.ChecktheNOcolumnandentertheHEDnumberandthedatacollection codenumberintheCOMMENTScolumnforthatcriterion orcriteria.
88-1 APPENDIXB9HUMANENGINEERING DISCREPANCY (HED)REPORTOR16IHATOR:
VALIDATED SY:PLANT/UN!
T~)HEDTITLE:b)ITEHSIHVOLVED:
C)PROBLEHDESCRIPTIOH:
d)DATACOLLECTIOH DESCRIPTION CODEHUHBER:e)SPECIFICHUHAkERROR(S):
B9-I APPENDIX89HEDREPORT(CONTINUED)
TlANT/VNI THEDHO.:f)SUGGESTED SACKFlT;g)REVlEHAHDDlSPOS1T10H:
89-2 0
ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983APPENDIXCCRITERIAMATRIX ANNONCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.1IMay1983CRITERIA~
'ATRIXCriteriaDistributed AcrossDataCollection Methods.Notes:1.Thefollowing codesapplytothematrixcolumns:M-Measurement (instruments and/ormeasuring devicesrequired) 0-Observations (observation notestaken)I-Interview/guestionnaire (generally astructured interview unlessotherwise specified) 0-DocumentReview(documentation reviewtoincludeengineering
- drawings, CMDs,etc.)A-AuditoryCriteriaV-VisualCriteriaC-ControlsCriteria(physical characteristics)
P-PhysicalArrangement/Location CriteriaF-Functional Criteria(usuallyrequiressomeoperational dataforverification) 2.Datasourceslistedaresuggested.
Alternatives shouldbeusedwhenthoselistedarenotavailable orarenotadequate.
ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983CRITERIAMATRIXCRITERIANUREG--0700 CrithB-'.3.1.1 6.3.1.2a(1) a(2)b(1)b(2)c(1)c(2)c(3)d(1)d(2)DATACOLLECTION METHODSXXXXXXXXXXXSUGGESTED DATASOURCESSFTARptOpsOpsOps,AnnRespProcsOpsAnnRespProcsOpsOpsOpsOpsREMARKSalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)6.3.1.3a(1) a(2)a(3)bcd6.3.1.4a(1) a(2)b(1)b(2)6.3.1.5ab(1)b(2)b(3)6.3.2.1a6.3.2.2a(1) a(2)b6.3.3.1ab{1)b(2)c(1)c(2)c(3)PFPFPFPFPFPFPFPFFFPFFFXN/AXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXN/AN/AN/APnlOpsOpsPnlPnlAllPnlPnl,SFTARptPnlPnlPnlPnl.PnlPnlCRCR,AdminProcsCR,OpsCR,OpsCRCR,OpsOpsOpsOpsPnlPnlCRseetextpara.4.2aalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)inTP-1~8-(Maint)inTP-1.8(Maint)inTP-1.8(Maint)C-2 ANNuNCIATOR SYSTENCRITERIAMATRIXTP-3.1IMay19B3CRITERIADATACOLLECTION NUREG--0700 CritMETHODS'UGGESTED DATASOURCESREMARKS6.3.3.28bcdef(>)f(2)6.3.3.3abc(I)c(2)c(3)d(I)d(2)'fFFFPPFPFPFPPFPPPPPFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXPnlPnl,Pnl,PnlPnl,Pnl,CompSpecOpsOpsOpsAdminProcsPnlSFTARptPnlPnlPnlPnlSFTARptOpsPnlalsoinTP-9.1{SFTA)alsoinTP-6.1(Labels)alsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)6.3.3.4abcd6.3.3.5a(I)a(2)b(I)b(2)b(3)cc(I)c(2)d{I)d(2)d(3)d(4)d(5)d(6)6.3.4.1a(1) a(2)b(I)b(2)c(I)c(2)c(3)PPFPFPPPFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPnl,OpsPnl,Pnl,PnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnlPnl,OpsPnl,OpsPnl,OpsOps5FTAOps,SFTARptConvRptOpsOpsOpsalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)alsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)C-3 ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11May1983CRITERIAMATRIXCRITERIANUREG--0700 CritDATACOLLECTION METHODSSUGGESTED DATASOURCESREMARKS6.3.4.1d(1)
Fd(2)FXXPnl,OpsXOps,AdminProcs6.3.4.2ab(1)b(2)b(3)b(4)cXXXXXXXPnlPnl,ConvRptPnl,ConvRptPnl,ConvRptPnl,ConvRptPnl,OpsalsoinTP-8.1(Conv)alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)6.3.4.3abXXXCR,Ops,SFTARptXAnnRespProcsalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)6.5.1.6ab(1)b(2)c(1)c(2)d(1)d(2)XXXXXXXXXXXXXConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptOps,ConvRptalsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1alsoinTP-8.1(Conv)(Conv)(Conv)(Conv)(Conv)(Conv)6.6.6.2aFbVCcPPnl,Ops,SFTARptPnlPnlalsoinTP-9.1(SFTA)alsoinTP-6.1(Labels)alsoinTP-6,1(Labels)
ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMTP-3.11Hay1983~~APPENDIXDTASKPLANCRITIQUE
~\
ANNUNCIATOR SYSTENTP-3.11Nay1983APPENDIXDTASKPLANCRITIQUEINSTRUCTIONS 1.AttachacopyofSection,4,0.2.Fillintherequiredinformation andanswerallquestions.
3.ExplainallNOanswersindetail.4.Whencomplete, turnintoyourimmediate supervisor.
1.NameofRespondent:
2.NameofPlant:3.DateofSurvey:4.Wereallofthecriteriacorrectandappropriateforthistask(donotexplaincriteriathatwereN/AbecauseSystem/CR didnothavethatdesignfeature)?
YESNO5.Didthetaskplaninstructions presenttheeasiestandbestmethodology forperforming theassessment?
YESNO6.Werethedatacollection formsadequate?
YESNO