IR 05000461/1997003: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20148R157
| number = ML20217P282
| issue date = 05/23/1997
| issue date = 08/01/1997
| title = Discusses Predecisional EC Conducted on 970515 Re Apparent Violations at Plant Identified in NRC Insp Rept 50-461/97-03.Root Causes,Contributing Factors & Corrective Actions Discussed.List of Attendees & Presentations Encl
| title = Discusses Insp Rept 50-461/97-03 on 970106-0307 & Forwards NOV & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties in Amount of $110,000 for Violations Noted
| author name = Pederson C
| author name = Beach A
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
| addressee name = Connell W
| addressee name = Cook J
| addressee affiliation = ILLINOIS POWER CO.
| addressee affiliation = ILLINOIS POWER CO.
| docket = 05000461
| docket = 05000461
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = 50-461-97-03, 50-461-97-3, EA-97-132, NUDOCS 9707070305
| document report number = 50-461-97-03, 50-461-97-3, EA-97-132, NUDOCS 9708270131
| package number = ML20217P287
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 26
| page count = 4
}}
}}


Line 18: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,
{{#Wiki_filter:.p. -
.
: :
,
UNITED STATES 7be s ** C ._oq\,,
O May 23, 1997 EA 97-132 Mr,. Vice President Clinton Power Station Illinois Power Company    l Mail Code V-275      l
NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION O
      '
P.O. Box 678 Clinton, IL 61727 SUBJECT: NRC PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE  I
 
==Dear Mr. Connell:==
This refers to a Predecisional Enforcement Conference conducted by Mr. A. Bill Beach, Regional Administrator, and other members of the Region lll and Headquarters staff on May 15,1997. The subject of this conference was the apparent violations at Clinton Station identified in NRC inspection Report No. 50-461/97003(DRS). The purpose of this conference was to discuss the violations, root causes, contributing factors, and corrective actions.
 
You will be notified by separate correspondence of our decision regarding the enforcement .
action based on the information presented and discussed at the Predecisional Enforcement Conference. No response is required until you are notified of the proposed enforcement action.      l l
During the Predecisional Enforcement Conference, you acknowledged the violations. The i presentation included a synopsis of the broader engineering issues identified in the j inspection as well as the specific enforcement issues. Also presented was a synopsis of l the causes, safety significance, and corrective actions taken for each potential violation.
 
A copy of the handout is enclosed.
 
'
V'
l i
    !!! !!''^ '
9707070305 970523 PDR ADOCK 05000461 G  PDR
_  __
j


! -
j e
l -
REGloN 111 801 WARRENVILLE ROAD
,
.y - /   USLE. ILUNotS 60532-4351
   .
  **'*    August 1, 1997 EA 97132 Mr. John Senior Vice President Illinois Power Company I
l
500 S. 27th Street Decatur, IL 62525 '97 E 11 Al0:59 SUBJECT: NOllCE OF VIOLWIlON ANRRBQPQSED IMPOSIT! J N OF civil PENALTIES
  .
  - $110,000 (NRC Engineering and Technical Support and Startup Readiness inspection Report 50-461/97003(DRS))  ,
j May 23, 1997 I           I i
i l In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter    i and the enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. I


Sincerely, l
==Dear Mr. Cook:==
    /s/ C. D. Pederson l
This refers to the inspection conducted from January 6,1997, through March 7,1997, at the Clinton Power Station (CPS). The inspection included aspects of engineering and technical support and selected startup readiness review action items. An exit for the inspection was conducted on March 7,1997. A predecisional enforcement conference was conducted on May 15,1997, to discuss issues related to safety related electrical breaker maintenance.
Cynthia D. Pederson, Director    l Division of Reactor Safety    '
Docket No. 50-461        l Enclosures: 1. List of Attendees 2. Licensee's Presentation cc w/encis: W. D. Romberg, Assistant Vice President      l P. Yocum, Plant Manager, Clinton Power Station     l R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Assessment J. Sipek, Director - Licensing Nathan Schloss, Economist,      l Office of the Attorney General      ;
G. Stramback, Regulatory Services      l Project Manager, General Electric Company    l Chairman, DeWitt County Board      l State Liaison Officer Chairman, Illinois Commerce Comn.:ssion Distribution:
Docket ile / encl  SRIs, Clinton,  Rlli Enf. Coordinator w/ encl (PUBLICJE, 4M/ericP  Dresden, LaSalle, TSS w/encI OC/LFDCB wlenci  Quad Cities w/ enc!  J. Lieberman, OE w/enct DRP w/enct  LPM, NRR w/ encl  J. Goldberg, OGC w/enct DRS w/enct  A. B. Beach, Ritt w/ encl  R. Zimmerman, NRR w/ encl Rlli PRR w/ encl  J. L. Caldwell, Rlli w/enci l
SEE ATTACHED CONCURRENCES DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRS\CL1051 7.DRS  ~
To r:e:ive a copy of this document, indicate in the t,ox: "C" = Copy w/o attachment / enclosure ''E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N"MNo copy OFFICE Rill:DRS l Rlll:DRS l Rlll:DRP l Rill:EICS l Rlll:Dfj$1f' l l NAME Falevits/kjc  Ring  Wright  Clayton  GrobefBeberson DATE 05/ /97  05/ /97 05/ /97  05/ /97 05/3 /97 OFFICIAL RECORD col'Y


. . . - . - , . . . . -
Based on the information developed during the inspection and the information CPS provided during the predecisional enforcement conference, the NRC has determined that a significant violation of NRC requirements occurred. The enclosure contains a Notice of Violation and Proposed imposition of Civil Penalties (Notice) that describe the violation. The circumstances surrounding the violation are described in detailin the subject inspection report.
.
  ,
I .
  *
i  3
'
  ..
j :
I-i  also presented a synopsis of the causes, safety significance, and corrective actions taken for each potential violation. A copy of the licensee's handout is enclosed.


Sincerely, i
The violation represents a significant program breakdown in that assurance was lost in that safety related electrical breakers would function if required. Both industry information and a previous related violation should have triggered broad scoped corrective actions to identify, correct, and prevent electrical breaker degradation. Failure to aggressively implement the reauirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, resulted in inadequate corrective action for a longstanding equipment problem and the serious degradation of safety related electrical breakers, in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, a base civil penalty in the amount of $55,000 is considered for a Severity Levelill violation. Because Clinton has been the subject of escalated enforcement actions within the last two years,' the NRC considered whether credit was warranted for identification and Corrective Action in accordance with the civil penalty assessment process in Section VI.B.2 of the Enforcement Policy. The NRC determined that credit for y.
L,
!
}<
'
'
Cynthia D. Pederson, Director
;    Division of Reactor Safety
  ' Docket No. 50-461
:
Enclosures: 1. List of Attendees 2. Licensee's Presentation cc w/encls: W. D. Romberg, Assistant Vice President P. Yocum, Plant Manager, Clinton Power Station R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Assessment J. Sipek, Director - Licensing Nathan Schloss, Economist, Office of the Attorney General G. Stramback, Regulatory Services Project Manager, General Electric Company Chairman, DeWitt County Board State Liaison Officer Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission Distribution:
Docket File w/ encl  SRis, Clinton,  Rill Enf. Coordinator w/ encl PUBLIC IE-01 w/enct  Dresden, LaSalle,  TSS w/ enc!
OC/LFDCB w/enci  Quad Cities w/enci  J. Lieberman, OE w/ encl-DRP w/ encl  LPM, NRR w/ enc!  J. Goldberg, OGC w/enci DRS w/enci  A. B. Beach, Rlli w/enci  R. Zimmerman, NRR w/enct Rlli PRR w/enci  J. L. Caldwell, Rlll w/enci DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRS\CLl051_7.DRS To rscrive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy w/o attachment / enclosure "E* = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE Rlli:DRS E Rill:DRS gff Rill:DRPM g  Rlli:EICS l L= Alll:DRS  j
          '
NAME Falevits/kjc - # RingM  Wright ( \Wj f n Clayton  /k Grobe/Pederson DATE 05/21/97  05/2//97  05/M; yd b 05/24/97  05/ /97  i OFFICIAL RECORD COPY    i


l
' Enforcement actions 96-412. 97-001 and 97 0o2 were issued June 9,1997. for issues related to the September 1996 seal f ailure event, the Division til emergency diesel and feedwater isolation valves. ( (
9708270131 970001    l Ull!llijligl Li lillilliIl PDR ADOCK 05000461    i **'''''.i G  PDR      /
        /


- . - . - _ -. - - - . . . . - - . . . ~ _ _ _ . - . _ ~ - . - . . . .-.._- -
________-____ -
*
.        1
        !
.
*
.
  ,
  ,
  '*
  .
  .
LIST OF ATTENDEES
  ,e.
 
lilinois Power Comoany      i l
G. Baker, Acting Manager, Nuclear Assessment
,
W. Connell, Vice President D. Kornemann, Projects Manager - Engineering D. Lukash, System Engineer A. Mueller, Assistant Plant Manager - Maintenance R. Phares, Assistant to the Vice President
[ R. Reding, Electrical Breaker Task Manager    )
W. Romberg, Assistant Vice President B. Sherman, Licensing i J. Sipak, Director - Licensing l M. Stickney, Licensing Supervisor    i
. D. Thompson, Manager, Nuclear Station Engineering i W. Toohey, Plant Steward IBEW
, E. Turner, Financial Controller i K. Trone, Electrical Maintenance I
M. Wagner, Engineering P. Yocum, Plant Manager Consumers Enerav T. Bordine l D. Shapiro, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius j K. Toner i
j ll'inois Deoartment of Nuclear Safety
: N. Howey D. Zemel
 
!
U.S. Nuclear Reaulatorv Commission    I A. Beach, Regional Administrator
: F. Brown, Project Engineer, Division of Reactor Projects  ,
: J. Caldwell, Deputy Regional Administrator    '
, B. Clayton, Enforcement Coordinator i
Z. Falevits, Reactor Engineer, Division of Reactor Safety J. Foster, Emergency Preparedness Analyst, Division of Reactor Safety R. Gardner,- Acting Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects  i
, J. Grobe, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety G. Marcus, Director, Project Directorate lll-3, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l C. Miller, Acting Chief, Projects Branch 4, Division of Reactor Projects D. Pickett, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E. Schweibinz, Project Engineer, Division of Reactor Projects R. Westberg, Acting Chief, Engineering Specialists Branch 2, Division of Reactor Safety G. Wright, Chief, Clinton Oversight Team, Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure 1
  - .  . _ , -  ,
 
4-=-vaa sFa..a4h.*--A e 4.J -sh-ee4dm di +das---d%wdse..D-.-+= 2..maa6sm .-Ms= r.Ae.MA.a-AMeda Adw 4%+As e a- ed-b C =d444 444.s 2 6Ae M h.k am4-.-fm.a4'dnL.-41 JD4mAh d.ba#m-Lism.E.-eJ-.A 4-r% A-4
%
 
i=  ~
        '?7
  .  ,y * - , '    '
        '
e : h >-? - ~ ?    '-
      ,  _a ar. :
      "Kau+g-
        .
        -
        ;g
        .
        .idTO'-
nm;#-_-p,, ;g;,
          ,
        -
i
          '' '  ''
        ,-
xn:&nl;:te~~k' '3 ]k  -
i-
            . .
          '
3    ,+
o    '
O 8    "3 s: e
          ,
          >
43 e    1 i
            "U O
!
      *a 01 %
i;
            <
w      q
:      e O    m e D
!
N d    @
;
a-    *
l      3    @      l o    *
            -.
o e
._.c
.
=                1
.
.
[i
.'I_ .7 'e QM W&
<%,fi$34
., $$
 
a_ m w
 
g
: N          i
          .
          !
Enclosure 2
-
_.
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - -
.
!
AGENDA
 
Introduction ;          Vice President -
Clinton Pow'er Station Breakers          D. Thompson I          Manager-Engineering i
l Lubricants        T. Mueller
,          Assistant Plant Manager-Maintenance
:
Engineering Department Initiatives        D. Thompson
,          Manager-Engineering
:
Closing Remarks Vice President -
Clinton Power Station
.
.          ILLINOIS i
POWER
-  ..    ..  . .- . -_ -
          .- .


  - - - _ - - - - - - - - - _ - _  - - --- -_-- -_ _ _
. -.
i
'
'
      .
'. < :
j
, identification was not warranted because the issue was identified by the NRC during an inspection. Corrective actions described at +he predecisional enforcement conference included establishment of a team to focus attention on breakus, a refurbishment plan for GE, Westinghouse, and ABB breakers, reviews of industry information, an improved review process for vendor information, a lowered threshold for condition reports, procedure improvements to specify lubricsnts, increased supervisory presence in the field, and training on procedure compliance. Your staff also discussed a maintenance review group responsible for tracking equipment f ailures and detailed system reviews to be performed over a five-year period. While these actions appeared adequate to restore the condition of the breakers, your staff did not address the broader problem of repetitive equipment failure:. Specifically, CPS did not look at maintenance work requests or other equipment failuro data to determine if there was a history of repetitive problems with other components. Therefore, credit for corrective action was not warranted.


Breaker issues
I have been authorized, after consultation with the Director, Office' of Enforcement, to issue the enclosed Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $110,000.
,
.  .
:
l . Apparent Violation: Failure to Take Prompt Corrective l  Action to Address Indications of Hardened or Hardening s
l  Grease l
'
. Affected Several Classe.s of Breakers i
! . \Neak Response to Indications From Inspections and i  Maintenance
.!
. Insufficient Response to Industry Information l;        ,
:
l . Vendor Recommendations Not Followed
:
;
;
! .
:-      ILLINOIS
).
-
POWER
. - _ _  - - . _ - - - _ _ - - - _  - - _ .


- -- - _-  -_  - - - - - - ----  - - - - - --
The need for this action is to emphasize the importance of strong and broad scope corrective action when deficiencies are identified relative to safety related equipment.


i i    Causes of Breaker Problems
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response, in your response, you should document the
;
    -
\
  . Narrow Focus in Response to Indications of Breaker
'
Problems i
I
.
  . Weak Focus and Response to IndustryNendor Isrues
          .
i
.
  . Lack of Documentation and Trending of Breaker
:  Problems for Analysis of Generic Implications
;
!
!
.
specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing j your response to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements. I further note that my staff continues to review activities at CPS, end further enforcement actions may be taken if additional violations are identified, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter,its enclosure (s), and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).
  . No Programmatic Approach to Breaker Maintenance
:  Activities i . Insufficient Site-Wide Focus on Breaker Issues        -
.
:
        -
i .
-
lLLINGIS-
.
POWER y *- y-e n m -- e 9- g w- 3c -m -- 3-9 ww pg=ewg , >+yw m-%e,,-,9--  avvwev-**,- i+, v g %-mvy gre e-w%-w vv g g e &-syv-q+ w - - er w gwgyww ggwyw


     - - - - - - - _ - _ - - - _ _ - - - - - - -
Sincerely, ac. t I
  .
     /A. Bill Beach Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-62 Enclosure: Notice of Violation and Proposed imposition of Civil Penalties I
        ;


  !
  ._ .. _. . . . . - _ __ _ . . . _ . . ~ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ - _ __  , _, _.- __.. . _ . -.
l F
          -
Establishment of Breaker Plan
. ..         ,
         '
*
!
..
;
F
$
  :.           s
i . Establishment of Multi-Disciplined Breaker Team


;  -
J. Cook-  -3
Analysis of Vendor Information
  -
Review of Industry Experience l
  -
Creation of Inspection and Refurbishment Plan i
:  . Improvements Since December 1996
 
4
 
i f
i .
. .
ILLINOIS
!        POWER
. . . .-_ . - - .. - -.-..... - _ - - .    .-_- - .._ - - - -
 
---- -- - - ---- - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - --
k l
l
.
ABB 480V Breakers
!
,
. 33 Safety-Related Breakers
. 1995 Refurbishment and Findings
. Current ABB Breaker Plan Status:
   -
21 Safety-Related Breakers Refurbished and in Service by the End of RF-6
  -
This Completes Refurbishment on All Division 11 Breakers
  -
Acceleration of Refurbishment Schedule of All Remaining Safety-Related Breakers by End of RF-7
        .
.
.        ILLINOIS
.
POWER
        .
 
      .
 
!
I I  GE Magna Blast Breakers l
.
) . 5 General Electric 4160 Volt "Magna Blast" Breakers
:
I
  -
All on Division ill Safety Bus  '
s
; e RF-6 Inspection and Acceptance Criteria
;
;
i . Schedule for Inspection / Refurbishment of Remaining l
cc w/encls: W. Romberg, Clinton Power Station
:
  - P. Yocum, Plant Manager
Breakers
  ,
,
   : Clinton Power Station      ,
:
F   R. Pha_res, Manager Nuclear Assessment
!
  '           ,
:
J. Sipek, Director - Licensing Nathan Schloss, Economist
k
"
: -
  .
ILLIN91S POWER
! :. . _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _
 
,
j. .
!
!
 
!
l   Westinghouse 4.16kV and 6.9kV Breakers
:
l
:
. 26 Safety-Related Breakers i
!
!  -
6 Reactor Recirculation System
!  -
10 Division 1 I  -
10 Division ll
!
l . CPS and Industry History of Breaker Performance i . Inspection and Testing of All Reactor Recirculation System Division I
!   Breakers and 1 Division 11 Breaker During RF-6 i
!
j  -
11 Tested to Date Have Passed
.
!
! . Schedule for Further Inspection / Refurbishment
!
  -
All Remaining Division ll Breakers Refurbished During Cycle 7
,
  -
;- .      ILLIN91S
:        POWER
. - _ - _ - - . - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . - . _ - -    . . . - .-
 
-_. - - - - _ - - ---
  .
  - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Summary of CPS Breaker Plan
  . All ABB Safety-Related Breakers Will Be Refurbished by the End of RF-7
  . All GE Magna Blast Breakers Will Be Refurbished During the Upcoming Operating Cycle
        '
  . All Westinghouse Safety-Relatecl Breakers Will Be Either Inspected and Tested During the Current Outage or Refurbished During the Upcoming Operating Cycle e
.
  ~
ILLINOIS
-
POWER
__
 
!
,
!
i
!
:
Additional Actions.to Ensure Strong Breaker Program
!
l
. Operator Requalification Training i
j . Procedural Training for Maintenance Craft -
:
!
l . Designation of Breaker Task Manager
!
; . Use of Outside Expertise to Ensure Breaker Program is Consistent with Best Industry Practices
; . Improved Process for Documenting, Trending, and Analyzing j Breaker Inspection and Maintenance Results
;
i i
!
!
I
'
'
. ILLINel$
Office of the Attorney General G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing
e POWER
           '
      ,.
 
--    ------ _ -- ----- ---- ---    - - - - - - - - - - -
  -
;    .
!
:
I
!          Breaker issues - Conclusions        ,
l
!
:
l      . Specific Problems Addressed i
i                    i
!
      . Confidence in Breaker Performance
                    ,
                    .
;
!
!      . Action to Ensure Breaker Maintenance in Future i                    .
I i      e  Generic Action to Address Causes        .
                    ,
                    '
i
!
l           _
$
!
  -
:
;-    .            ILLINOIS
  .
POWER  -
__._____.__.__________.-___________________________-____..__.___._______._._.__.__.-____..___-.-..________________-..______._m-.  - _ - _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . - _ - . _ _ _ . _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ - . _ _ _ . . _ .m--_mm__ ___ _ ,___ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _
 
,
I      !
;
:  Lubricant issues
 
i
;
,
e Control and Dissemination of Lubricants
:
! * Use of Unapproved Cleaners and Lubricants on Breakers
:
i l . Insufficient Maintenance Guidance on Mixing of Greases
;  and Cleaning
 
;
! . Discrepancies Between Approved Vendor Manuals and i  implementing Plant Procedures
      ,
j . Incomplete Equipment Lubrication Standard
:
i
:
i
-
l- . ILLINOIS
:    PfeWER
- . -- _ ..- _.- - - _ --. .- . .- -.
 
_--.  - - - - - - - __-
: . .
!
.
l    Causes of Lubricant Problems
,
;
  * Insufficient Programmatic Controls to Ensure Proper i  Lubrication of Electrical Breaker Components, i.e., Lack l
of Procedure Quality
,
i  . Failure to Follow Proper Lubricating Standards
;
.
 
-
!
<
't
:
:
 
,
-
.
;. '
ILLINGIS
!
'
POWER
. _ _ _ _ - _ _ . . _ . . _ _ . . _ . _ _ . _ _ . . .
 
      . - --    - - - - - - - -
  ..
;
:
!
:
.
Specific Corrective Actions
;
;
'
'
  . Mixing of Mobil 28 Grease
Services Project Manager-General Electric Company Chairman, DeWitt County Board State Liaison Officer Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
  -
Revision of GE Magna Blast Procedure j  -
Validation and Training on GE Magna Blast Procedure j  -
Inspection of Breaker j  -
Improved Process of Processing Vendor Information
:
i
!   . Use of Never-Seize            i i
!  -
Removal From Breaker and Proper Lubrication of Breaker
  -
Preventive Maintenance and Breaker Inspections li
!
!  . Use of Freon
;
j  -
Procedure Change Caution Statement
  -
:  . Machine Oil
.
l  ,
  -
Procedure Change
-
  .              ILLINGIS
!
-
POWER
: _ . _ . . . , _ . . , _ , . -
  .
  .
  . - . , , , _ . . _ - _ . , , _ . . . , _ . - . _ . . , . . . . _ . _ . . , . . _ _ _ . . _ , _ . . . . _ . _ . , _ , . - . . . . , . . _ . . _ , . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . , , _ . . , . _,


- _ - _ -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
s a
!
:
l        r
!
j  Actions to Ensure Strong Lubricant Program i
,
,
i
!
!  . Controls on Dissemination of Lubricants
(
j  . Expansion of Equipment Lubrication Standard i
  . Guidance on Lubricant Use and Procedure Revision  -
:,
!  . Increased Monitoring to Ensure Expectations for Control
!  and Use of Lubricants are Met
:
!
!  . Training Sessions on Lessons Learned From This~ Event
!
!
;
  . Site-Wide Effort on Procedure Use and Adherence
:l
:
-
  .
ILLINelS
.
POWER
-___ _ _ _.._ ___ __..._ ___ ____  _ _.. ___.


..
i I
l Lubricant issues-Conclusions
i l'
,
;'
I i'
,
,
'
+
  . Specific Lubricant Problems Corrected
I.


  . Action to Improve Future Performance
;
e Broader Action to Address Potential Generic implications
4
.
i
i
!
:
,
,
e
  '
  '
1 . ILLINOIS POWER
~
.
. .. .. . .-. . _ . - -


; ..
I i
i i Generic Engineering Department Improvement Actions
;
:
i    ;
i
i
;
. Reorganization of Engineering Department
!
!
;
  --- ., i  - . < . . _ , . . . . ,.mo , . ..% . - - -
-
Increased Supervision and Accountability l -
Work Disposition i
  -
Engineering Assessment Strengthened
  -
Creation of Engineering Response Team


i
_ . . . _ _ . _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . . . _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . . . - . . _
!    /
.
I
!
i
; .
J- . ILLINOIS
, .
POWER
 
  - -- --- - -- - - -  - - -
: '  ~
l      CPS Breaker Team i
!
Maintenance i
Nuclear Station Engineering Ass.istant Plant Manager a Manager i          i
:
;
;
r--------------. Breaker Task Manager i    1 Maintenance Services Specialist
,    i
'
I
:
Breaker Team
,
Technical Lead
* Auxiliary Power System m
      '
      . Plant Engineering (3)  '
}      Procurement Engineering (2)
; Eng,ineer
      * Operations Engineering  Oversicht
      . Electrical Maintenance
          ~
    .
    '      * ISEG I
      * Maintenance Planning
    !    . Plant Scheduling
;
      . Quality Assurance
!
 
Consultants      . Material Management (3)
l o Duke Engineering Services    * Training l * Nuclear Logistics Inc. Plant Support Services t
Lubrication Sub Team i      Procurement Engineering
.      * Electrical Maintenance
;,      * Maintenance Planning
. .
 
g -e g- -v,7v-y, . ,-wr,,- ..v,., y,,ww, ,y, , , ,..,r-pm ,-y-,-,,.3..,-, , - , , _--N
 
. -
Breaker Team Documents m
    '
CPS Breaker inspection Test Plan l    for GE & Westinghouse Breakers
,
:
!
!
:
'
Information
'        U
* Vendor Literature & Discussions CPS History Data    m CPS Refurbish..sent Plan for GE,
:      -
Westinghouse & ABB Breakers
!  EPRl/NMAC User Groups & Literat.ure l * Industry Peers, Procedures      n
;  Consultants j * Industry Feedback Documents
!
!
!    _
    "
CPS Refurbishment Specification for GE, e    Westinghouse & ABB Breakers i
;
i j      .U i
i    CPS Receipt inspection Checklist for GE,
[
-
Westinghouse & ABB Breakers
;. . ,
:
- _ . ~ . . . . _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ . . _ . _ . . _  -_
 
    . . ..
t
.         ;
Breaker inspection Information Flow  -
          !
1          h r
          !
,
CPS Breaker inspection / Test Plan for GE &      i Westinghouse Breakers    !
    '
          !
I u    ;
Criteria incorooration    j
  * Incorporation of Inspection /Fest Plan Acceptance      !
Criteria into Plant Procedures        ;
I U    !-
          :
l
;
Data Acauisition    j l
  * Work Performed via Maintenance Work Request      !
l          l u    l
          >
Criteria  No  l Exceeded    i
          :
          !
y Yes    j
          :
Actions    j
          '
l * Resolve Problem
  -
Maintenan~ce Work Request      l
  -
Condition Report        :
          ;
*
Expand Breaker Scope per Inspectionffest Plan to inspect      l and/or Refurbish Other Breakers        l t
i yc    ;
Data    l l ,
   *
   *
Data to System Engineer (Trending)      !
  .:.3.-  .
          -
  .,
 
l J. Cook-     4 --- :
          *
  ,
          .
  -----,c ,-w-e-- +,e,-ne., ev e ,--ww w we- ev w w w -e-y -wv--- w- - , - + + -+r--- vw-e----r-r,--v-r-we, e ,--we---- w wwv~ w e ~~ *


        .l I 3
  $ECY CA L. Callan, EDO A. Thadani, DEDE -
   .
   .
                -
L. Chundler, OGC J. Goldberg, OGC     '
l . .
S. Collins, NRR -
l
R. Zimmerman, NRR Enforcement Coordinators Rl, Ril and R!V SRI Clinton, Dresden, LaSalle,
.
        *
Previous Oraanization
and Quad Cities T. Pruett, RIV -
:
G. Marcus, NRR-D. Pickett, NRR
:
  - J. Gilliland, OPA-H. Bell, OlG G. Caputo, 01 L. Tremper, OC '
j        Manager NSED
O. Ross, AEOD OE:ES OE:EA (2)
,
G. Johnson, OC/DAF RAO:Rlli SLO:Rl!I
 
   ' PAO: Rill OC/LFDCB      '
l  Secretary
DRP       '
:
Docket File
!
_ . - - .    . . _ , - . . . - -  , . _ - . -- -
!
!.
,
[  Director Plant  .
Director  Director Resource Engineering     Engineering i
Proj.ects .
Management j
:        .
I i  - - - -
Shift Engineer - 6
:
-
l
;
i
;
;
;
!
l  Team Leaders - 4      Team Leaders - 5    Team Leaders - 2
:
l Team Members - 49    Team Members - 55    Team Members - 10
:
.
b
 
i e
*
  *
'
*
,
---.r- .-..w. . ..e4,.w--w-.w . - . , , , - , , . . ....m...,, . - . ,,.%,.,
      -
      , ,, , .,-www-,,,...,r,-w. m*.,-m. w.,w.v..,,w ,,--w--w.-, ,,,.,,,v. ~.--,,-,e. .-,-g v.--m'nww---+-,..w- -- . -. - ..
 
        . . - , - -
o + 4 W
 
*          i 4  .        i g    _-
l .
 
  -        l
  *  '-~
. -  I,   . .
I r t I
    -
      :
  '
Il [c
  '
I ~
      '
1 l  i l
  . , ,  T_fl}[}r' _
l
 
.
.
  :T .,  _      :
    ~
I -
T
   }} }
  . . ,  T _
1, __
      ,
q .
  .
[ [' [ [ t '
J  p I.  '
II. 11 ll. T~        !
  . .
l
. . .
y I~
fl .
f j fI'
  , ,  1    -
l i
    --"
8 i       l I
    .(-
1-  _
__
        '
l
  . _
      -  -
 
-
I.r  '
a ,
I l (
    - -
3., i L_"-      I o ;
   .
yp  : I
        '
        ,
a Q)
        :s g-
          ;
g.g
        .
    ,
    ,
        ;,
    -
        [  , S.
 
11 _['    '
g
        -
s
      ~
I" .i  !
l
        -
_'
 
_
l
  !I   {,
      ;
      {
_  _ _
11f._[_
 
      '
      -
I
          .
M l
    '
l
    " -
I i! _I,,
  . _      j
    "
I.r  e      i
_11~_g- _
sensumu I
I r-r I _ _  __
-[,
          .
      , .
  ?
j} 'l i-    -
          ,
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:48, 17 December 2021

Discusses Insp Rept 50-461/97-03 on 970106-0307 & Forwards NOV & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties in Amount of $110,000 for Violations Noted
ML20217P282
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/01/1997
From: Beach A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Jackie Cook
ILLINOIS POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20217P287 List:
References
50-461-97-03, 50-461-97-3, EA-97-132, NUDOCS 9708270131
Download: ML20217P282 (4)


Text

.p. -

:

UNITED STATES 7be s ** C ._oq\,,

NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION O

j e

REGloN 111 801 WARRENVILLE ROAD

.y - / USLE. ILUNotS 60532-4351

    • '* August 1, 1997 EA 97132 Mr. John Senior Vice President Illinois Power Company I

500 S. 27th Street Decatur, IL 62525 '97 E 11 Al0:59 SUBJECT: NOllCE OF VIOLWIlON ANRRBQPQSED IMPOSIT! J N OF civil PENALTIES

- $110,000 (NRC Engineering and Technical Support and Startup Readiness inspection Report 50-461/97003(DRS)) ,

Dear Mr. Cook:

This refers to the inspection conducted from January 6,1997, through March 7,1997, at the Clinton Power Station (CPS). The inspection included aspects of engineering and technical support and selected startup readiness review action items. An exit for the inspection was conducted on March 7,1997. A predecisional enforcement conference was conducted on May 15,1997, to discuss issues related to safety related electrical breaker maintenance.

Based on the information developed during the inspection and the information CPS provided during the predecisional enforcement conference, the NRC has determined that a significant violation of NRC requirements occurred. The enclosure contains a Notice of Violation and Proposed imposition of Civil Penalties (Notice) that describe the violation. The circumstances surrounding the violation are described in detailin the subject inspection report.

The violation represents a significant program breakdown in that assurance was lost in that safety related electrical breakers would function if required. Both industry information and a previous related violation should have triggered broad scoped corrective actions to identify, correct, and prevent electrical breaker degradation. Failure to aggressively implement the reauirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, resulted in inadequate corrective action for a longstanding equipment problem and the serious degradation of safety related electrical breakers, in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, a base civil penalty in the amount of $55,000 is considered for a Severity Levelill violation. Because Clinton has been the subject of escalated enforcement actions within the last two years,' the NRC considered whether credit was warranted for identification and Corrective Action in accordance with the civil penalty assessment process in Section VI.B.2 of the Enforcement Policy. The NRC determined that credit for y.

' Enforcement actions96-412. 97-001 and 97 0o2 were issued June 9,1997. for issues related to the September 1996 seal f ailure event, the Division til emergency diesel and feedwater isolation valves. ( (

9708270131 970001 l Ull!llijligl Li lillilliIl PDR ADOCK 05000461 i **.i G PDR /

/

________-____ -

,

'*

.

,e.

'

'. < :

, identification was not warranted because the issue was identified by the NRC during an inspection. Corrective actions described at +he predecisional enforcement conference included establishment of a team to focus attention on breakus, a refurbishment plan for GE, Westinghouse, and ABB breakers, reviews of industry information, an improved review process for vendor information, a lowered threshold for condition reports, procedure improvements to specify lubricsnts, increased supervisory presence in the field, and training on procedure compliance. Your staff also discussed a maintenance review group responsible for tracking equipment f ailures and detailed system reviews to be performed over a five-year period. While these actions appeared adequate to restore the condition of the breakers, your staff did not address the broader problem of repetitive equipment failure:. Specifically, CPS did not look at maintenance work requests or other equipment failuro data to determine if there was a history of repetitive problems with other components. Therefore, credit for corrective action was not warranted.

I have been authorized, after consultation with the Director, Office' of Enforcement, to issue the enclosed Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $110,000.

The need for this action is to emphasize the importance of strong and broad scope corrective action when deficiencies are identified relative to safety related equipment.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response, in your response, you should document the

!

specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing j your response to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements. I further note that my staff continues to review activities at CPS, end further enforcement actions may be taken if additional violations are identified, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter,its enclosure (s), and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).

Sincerely, ac. t I

/A. Bill Beach Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-62 Enclosure: Notice of Violation and Proposed imposition of Civil Penalties I

._ .. _. . . . . - _ __ _ . . . _ . . ~ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ - _ __ , _, _.- __.. . _ . -.

-

. .. ,

..

F

. s

J. Cook- -3

cc w/encls: W. Romberg, Clinton Power Station

- P. Yocum, Plant Manager

,

Clinton Power Station ,

F R. Pha_res, Manager Nuclear Assessment

' ,

J. Sipek, Director - Licensing Nathan Schloss, Economist

"

'

Office of the Attorney General G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing

'

'

Services Project Manager-General Electric Company i Chairman, DeWitt County Board State Liaison Officer Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission

.

s a

,

i I

i l'

'

I i'

,

+

I.

i

,

e

'

i

!

--- ., i - . < . . _ , . . . . ,.mo , . ..% . - - -

_ . . . _ _ . _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . . . _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . . . - . . _

.:.3.- .

.,

l J. Cook- 4 ---  :

.l I 3

$ECY CA L. Callan, EDO A. Thadani, DEDE -

.

L. Chundler, OGC J. Goldberg, OGC '

S. Collins, NRR -

R. Zimmerman, NRR Enforcement Coordinators Rl, Ril and R!V SRI Clinton, Dresden, LaSalle,

and Quad Cities T. Pruett, RIV -

G. Marcus, NRR-D. Pickett, NRR

- J. Gilliland, OPA-H. Bell, OlG G. Caputo, 01 L. Tremper, OC '

O. Ross, AEOD OE:ES OE:EA (2)

G. Johnson, OC/DAF RAO:Rlli SLO:Rl!I

' PAO: Rill OC/LFDCB '

DRP '

Docket File

_ . - - . . . _ , - . . . - - , . _ - . -- -