ML20203B552: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 27: Line 27:
==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SAFEGUARDS EVALUATION REPORT: SUBMITTAL DATED NOVEMBER 13,1997, REVISION TO FUNDAMENTAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTROL PLAN                                                                  F i
SAFEGUARDS EVALUATION REPORT: SUBMITTAL DATED NOVEMBER 13,1997, REVISION TO FUNDAMENTAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTROL PLAN                                                                  F i
BACKGROUND 1              By cover letter dated November 13,1997, General Electric (GE) submitted changes to its Fundamental Nuclear Mate ial Control (FNMC) Plan, none of which represented a decrease in effectiveness relative to the commitments in the existing approved Plan. Thus, the submitted FNMC Plan revisions qualify as changes permitted by 10 CFR 70.32(c).
BACKGROUND 1              By cover {{letter dated|date=November 13, 1997|text=letter dated November 13,1997}}, General Electric (GE) submitted changes to its Fundamental Nuclear Mate ial Control (FNMC) Plan, none of which represented a decrease in effectiveness relative to the commitments in the existing approved Plan. Thus, the submitted FNMC Plan revisions qualify as changes permitted by 10 CFR 70.32(c).
E                  plSCUSSION The licenses submitted various changes to the FNMC Plan within Chapters 3.0 (Management Structure),4.0 (MC&A Measuremer.ts), and 7,0 (Identification and Resolution of Significant i
E                  plSCUSSION The licenses submitted various changes to the FNMC Plan within Chapters 3.0 (Management Structure),4.0 (MC&A Measuremer.ts), and 7,0 (Identification and Resolution of Significant i
S5ipper-Receiver Differences). In all, the subject chapters of the FNMC Plan were submitted
S5ipper-Receiver Differences). In all, the subject chapters of the FNMC Plan were submitted

Latest revision as of 15:33, 7 December 2021

SER Accepting Rev to GE Fundamental Nuclear Matl Control Plan
ML20203B552
Person / Time
Site: 07001113
Issue date: 02/17/1998
From: Weber M
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20203B538 List:
References
NUDOCS 9802240317
Download: ML20203B552 (1)


Text

- - . .-.~ - . . . . - . . - _ _ _ _ . . - - - - - . - - - - . - . - . -

=

pann p 1  % UNITED STATES

' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS810N p

}. WASHINGTON, D.C. 30eeH001 o

% _ february 17, 1998 l

1 DOCKET: 70 1113 LICENSEE: General Electric Compcfiy 3 4 Wilmington, North Carolina  ;

SUBJECT:

SAFEGUARDS EVALUATION REPORT: SUBMITTAL DATED NOVEMBER 13,1997, REVISION TO FUNDAMENTAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTROL PLAN F i

BACKGROUND 1 By cover letter dated November 13,1997, General Electric (GE) submitted changes to its Fundamental Nuclear Mate ial Control (FNMC) Plan, none of which represented a decrease in effectiveness relative to the commitments in the existing approved Plan. Thus, the submitted FNMC Plan revisions qualify as changes permitted by 10 CFR 70.32(c).

E plSCUSSION The licenses submitted various changes to the FNMC Plan within Chapters 3.0 (Management Structure),4.0 (MC&A Measuremer.ts), and 7,0 (Identification and Resolution of Significant i

S5ipper-Receiver Differences). In all, the subject chapters of the FNMC Plan were submitted

ih a new designated date. These Plan changes involved

o Correction of typographic errors throughout the subject chapters, ,

e A revision to address the handling of certain materials of very low uranium concentration, and l
-e Clarification of transforred material from other licensees and addition of enrichment

! confirmation measurement.

I All the ' proposed changes had been previously discussed with the NRC MC&A liceming reviewer and upon review were found to be acceptable.

CONCLUSION

, - The staff concludes that the licensee's FNMC Plan revision does not decrease the effectiveness of the MC&A safeguards program and is, therefore, acceptable. The staff also determined that -

. the revised Plan coritains appropriate and necessary' commitments to satisfy applicable MC&A

. regulations specified in 10 CFR 74.31, The Operations Branch (FCOB) inspection staff has no objection to this proposed action.

g PRINCIPAL CONTRIBUTOR N

_ _ Thomas N. Pham  % .2uJJ a

gid T$M Mk 13 p

C. PDR o-e,