|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISONA n EDISONINTERNATIONAL Company u.s.Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 June 27, 2011 Richard J.St.Onge Director N u"cIearRegu latory A ffairs 10CFR50.75 | | {{#Wiki_filter:I ~I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Richard J. St. Onge |
| | ~ EDISON Director Nu"cIear Regulatory Affairs An EDIS ON INTER NA TIO NAL Company 10CFR50.75 June 27, 2011 u.s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN : Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| SanOnofre Nuclear Generating Station,Units2and3 DocketNos.50-361and50-362 Response to Request for Additional Informationonthe10CFR 50.75(f)(1)
| | San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 Response to Request for Additional Information on the 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report |
| DecommissioningFundingStatus Report
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Reference:== | | ==Reference:== |
| | | Letter from Richard J. St Onge (SCE) to NRC (Document Control Desk) |
| Letter from RichardJ.St Onge (SCE)toNRC (Document Control Desk)Dated March30,2011, | | Dated March 30, 2011, |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| DocketNos.50-361and 50-362 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1)Decommissioning Funding Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating StationUnits2and3 By letter dated March30,2011 (Reference), Southern California Edison submitted the Decommissioning Funding Status Report for San OnofreUnits2and3.
| | Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 By letter dated March 30, 2011 (Reference), Southern California Edison submitted the Decommissioning Funding Status Report for San Onofre Units 2 and 3. Bye-mail dated May 10, 2011 , the NRC requested additional information. Responses to the NRC request for additional information are provided in the Enclosure to this letter. |
| Bye-mail dated May10,2011 ,theNRC requested additional information | | There are no new commitments contained in this letter. |
| .ResponsestotheNRC request for additional information are providedinthe Enclosuretothis letter.Thereareno new commitments containedinthisletter. | | Should you have any questions, please contact Ms. Linda T. Conklin at (949) 368-9443 . |
| Shouldyouhaveany questions, please contactMs.LindaT.
| | Sincerely, |
| Conklinat(949)368-9443.Sincerely,
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Enclosure:== | | ==Enclosure:== |
| | Request for Additional Information on the 2011 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 cc: E. E. Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV R. Hall, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 G. G. Warnick, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 P.O. Box 128 San Clemente , CA 92674 |
|
| |
|
| Request for Additional Informationonthe2011 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for San Onofre Nuclear Generating StationUnits2and3cc:E.E.Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IVR.Hall, NRC Project Manager, San OnofreUnits2and3 G.G.Warnick, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San OnofreUnits2and3 P.O.Bo x 128SanClemente
| | Enclosure Responses to Request for Additional Information on San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Decommissioning Funding Status Report |
| , C A 92674
| |
| | |
| Enclosure | |
| | |
| Responses to Request for Additional Information on San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Deco mmissioning Funding Status Report | |
| | |
| 1 of 6 RESPONSES TO NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE SAN ONOFRE UNITS 2 AND 3 DECOMMISIONING FUNDING STATUS REPORT
| |
| | |
| RAI No. 1: Minimum DFA calculation:
| |
| Provide the labor, energy, and burial factors used in the calculation of the minimum requirement for decommissioning financial assurance and, if necessary, a corrected submittal for that part of the DFS report.
| |
| | |
| On March 30, 2011, SCE reported an amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c) less than the amount calculated by the NRC staff. According to 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), the amount provided in the DFS report should be "the amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c)."
| |
|
| |
|
| The formulas for the factors used by the staff can be found using NUREG-1307, Rev. 14, "Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities." For example, the calculations for the Labor and Energy Adjustment Factors can be found on pages 7 and 8 of NUREG-1307, Rev. 14. | | RESPONSES TO NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE SAN ONOFRE UNITS 2 AND 3 DECOMMISIONING FUNDING STATUS REPORT RAI No. 1: Minimum DFA calculation: |
| | Provide the labor, energy, and burial factors used in the calculation of the minimum requirement for decommissioning financial assurance and, if necessary, a corrected submittal for that part of the DFS report. |
| | On March 30, 2011, SCE reported an amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c) less than the amount calculated by the NRC staff. |
| | According to 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), the amount provided in the DFS report should be the amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c). |
| | The formulas for the factors used by the staff can be found using NUREG-1307, Rev. 14, Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities. For example, the calculations for the Labor and Energy Adjustment Factors can be found on pages 7 and 8 of NUREG-1307, Rev. 14. |
| SCE Response: | | SCE Response: |
| SCE's calculations of the minimum financ ial assurance amounts were based on NUREG-1307, Rev. 14. SCE's labor, energy, and burial factors, and associated calculations, are provided below:
| | SCEs calculations of the minimum financial assurance amounts were based on NUREG-1307, Rev. 14. SCEs labor, energy, and burial factors, and associated calculations, are provided below: |
| 2 of 6 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 Minimum Decommissioning Amount Calculations 100% Plant Share - 12/31/2010
| | 1 of 6 |
| | |
| Step Factor Amount Millions Basis A Initial Minimum Amount (per unit) 105.0 10 CFR 50.75(c) Formula (>3400 MWT) B Base L x Dec. 2005, West Region 2.06 NUREG-1307, Rev. 14, Table 3.2 C Labor Composite Q4 2010 Value 112.500 BLS CIU2010000000240I D Labor Escalation Factor 2.318 Steps C
| |
| * B / 100 E Labor Weighting Factor @ 65% 1.506 Step D
| |
| * 65% F Labor Adjustment $158.1 Steps A *E G Power Factor (1/86) Value, Reg Guide 114.200 BLS WPU0543 H Power End of Year 2010 Value 193.300 BLS WPU0543 I Power Escalation Factor 1.693 Steps H / G J Power Weighting Factor @ 58% 0.982 Step I
| |
| * 58% K Fuel Factor (1/86) Value, Reg Guide 82.000 L Fuel End of Year 2010 Value 224.300 BLS WPU0573 (preliminary) M Fuel Escalation Factor 2.735 Steps L / K N Fuel Weighting Factor @ 42% 1.149 Step M
| |
| * 42% O Energy Escalation Factor 2.131 Steps J + N P Energy Weighting Factor @ 13% 0.277 Step O
| |
| * 13% Q Energy Adjustment $29.1 Steps A
| |
| * P R B x 2010 Value, NUREG-1307 Rev. 14, Generic Site 12.280 Table 2.1, NUREG-1307 Rev. 14 S Burial Weighting Factor @ 22% 2.702 Step R
| |
| * 22% T Burial Adjustment $283.7 Steps A
| |
| * S Total Escalation Adjustments $470.9 Sum Steps F + Q + T The calculation of the Minimum Decommissioning Amount for SONGS Unit 3 is identical.
| |
| 3 of 6 RAI No. 2: Reporting requirements:
| |
|
| |
|
| SCE should indicate whether there are any material changes to the trust agreements from the last submittal.
| | San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 Minimum Decommissioning Amount Calculations 100% Plant Share - 12/31/2010 Amount Step Factor Millions Basis A Initial Minimum Amount (per unit) 105.0 10 CFR 50.75(c) Formula (>3400 MWT) |
| | B Base Lx Dec. 2005, West Region 2.06 NUREG-1307, Rev. 14, Table 3.2 C Labor Composite Q4 2010 Value 112.500 BLS CIU2010000000240I D Labor Escalation Factor 2.318 Steps C |
| | * B / 100 E Labor Weighting Factor @ 65% 1.506 Step D |
| | * 65% |
| | F Labor Adjustment $158.1 Steps A *E G Power Factor (1/86) Value, Reg Guide 114.200 BLS WPU0543 H Power End of Year 2010 Value 193.300 BLS WPU0543 I Power Escalation Factor 1.693 Steps H / G J Power Weighting Factor @ 58% 0.982 Step I |
| | * 58% |
| | K Fuel Factor (1/86) Value, Reg Guide 82.000 L Fuel End of Year 2010 Value 224.300 BLS WPU0573 (preliminary) |
| | M Fuel Escalation Factor 2.735 Steps L / K N Fuel Weighting Factor @ 42% 1.149 Step M |
| | * 42% |
| | O Energy Escalation Factor 2.131 Steps J + N P Energy Weighting Factor @ 13% 0.277 Step O |
| | * 13% |
| | Q Energy Adjustment $29.1 Steps A |
| | * P R Bx 2010 Value, NUREG-1307 Rev. 14, 12.280 Table 2.1, NUREG-1307 Rev. 14 Generic Site S Burial Weighting Factor @ 22% 2.702 Step R |
| | * 22% |
| | T Burial Adjustment $283.7 Steps A |
| | * S Total Escalation Adjustments $470.9 Sum Steps F + Q + T The calculation of the Minimum Decommissioning Amount for SONGS Unit 3 is identical. |
| | 2 of 6 |
|
| |
|
| | RAI No. 2: Reporting requirements: |
| | SCE should indicate whether there are any material changes to the trust agreements from the last submittal. |
| On March 30, 2011, SCE reported that none of the licensees were relying on any contracts pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(v) and that there were no modifications to their method of providing financial assurance. However, SCE did not indicate if there were any material changes to the trust agreements from the last submittal. As stated under 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1): | | On March 30, 2011, SCE reported that none of the licensees were relying on any contracts pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(v) and that there were no modifications to their method of providing financial assurance. However, SCE did not indicate if there were any material changes to the trust agreements from the last submittal. As stated under 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1): |
| [T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] any contracts upon which the licensee is relying under paragraph (e)(1)(v) of this section; any modifications occurring to a licensees current method of providing financial assurance since the last submitted report; and any material changes to trust agreements. . . | | [T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] any contracts upon which the licensee is relying under paragraph (e)(1)(v) of this section; any modifications occurring to a licensees current method of providing financial assurance since the last submitted report; and any material changes to trust agreements. . . |
| SCE Response: | | SCE Response: |
| There were no material changes to SCE's nuclear decommissioning trust agreements since the last submittal. | | There were no material changes to SCEs nuclear decommissioning trust agreements since the last submittal. |
| | | RAI No. 3: Citation for real rate of returns: |
| RAI No. 3: Citation for real rate of returns: | | Provide the citation(s) (e.g, an Order by the rate-regulatory authority) by the regulatory entity that allows for the assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rate of earnings on decommissioning funds and rates of other factors assumed in your DFS report. On March 30, 2011, SCE reported the following for the joint owners of SONGS 2 and 3: |
| Provide the citation(s) (e.g, an Order by the rate-regulatory authority) by the regulatory entity that allows for the assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rate of earnings on decommissioning funds and rates of other factors assumed in your DFS report. On March 30, 2011, SCE reported the following for the joint owners of SONGS 2 and 3: | |
| | |
| SCE: | | SCE: |
| 6.93 percent rate of escalation in burial costs, 2.32 percent rate of escalation in "other" costs, and 4.46 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds. | | 6.93 percent rate of escalation in burial costs, 2.32 percent rate of escalation in other costs, and 4.46 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds. |
| | | San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E): |
| San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E): | | 6.93 percent rate of escalation in burial costs, 2.32 percent rate of escalation in other costs, and 4.14 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds. |
| | |
| 6.93 percent rate of escalation in burial costs, 2.32 percent rate of escalation in "other" costs, and 4.14 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds. | |
| | |
| City of Anaheim (Anaheim): | | City of Anaheim (Anaheim): |
| 4 percent rate of escalation in decommissioning costs, 4 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds. | | 4 percent rate of escalation in decommissioning costs, 4 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds. |
| | City of Riverside (Riverside): |
| | 4 percent rate of escalation in decommissioning costs, 3.87 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds. |
| | 3 of 6 |
|
| |
|
| City of Riverside (Riverside):
| | As stated in 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), |
| | |
| 4 percent rate of escalation in decommissioning costs, 3.87 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds.
| |
| 4 of 6 As stated in 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1),
| |
| [T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] the assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections. . . | | [T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] the assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections. . . |
| SCE Response: | | SCE Response: |
| The 6.93% escalation rate for burial costs used by SCE and SDG&E was approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in Decision 10-07-047. | | The 6.93% escalation rate for burial costs used by SCE and SDG&E was approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in Decision 10-07-047. |
| | | Annual contribution amounts to each San Onofre co-owners decommissioning trusts are based on assumed rates of escalation in decommissioning costs and rates of earnings on decommissioning funds that are approved by a rate-regulatory authority. In addition, each San Onofre co-owner annually updates its decommissioning cost escalation rate and decommissioning fund rate of return assumptions independent of regulatory rate-setting proceedings for decommissioning funding. SCE reported the updated rates assumed by each San Onofre co-owner as of December 31, 2010. |
| Annual contribution amounts to each San Onofre co-owner's decommissioning trusts are based on assumed rates of escalation in decommissioning costs and rates of earnings on decommissioning funds that are approved by a rate-regulatory authority. In addition, each San Onofre co-owner annually updates its decommissioning cost escalation rate and decommissioning fund rate of return assumptions independent of regulatory rate-setting proceedings for decommissioning funding. SCE reported the updated rates assumed by each San Onofre co-owner as of December 31, 2010. | | RAI No. 4: Rate of escalation clarification: |
| RAI No. 4: Rate of escalation clarification: | | Clarify which escalation costs are attributable to radiological costs associated for radiological decommissioning. Define what other costs imply and why Riverside and Anaheim do not have such a breakdown. Also, clarify for the NRC staffs review, why Riverside has an escalation factor higher than its rate of earnings. |
| | | On March 30, 2011, SCE provided the escalation decommissioning costs for site specific decommissioning and the rate of earnings for each joint owner of SONGS 2 and 3. |
| Clarify which escalation costs are attributable to radiological costs associated for radiological decommissioning. Define what "other" costs imply and why Riverside and Anaheim do not have such a breakdown. Also, clarify for the NRC staff's review, why Riverside has an escalation factor higher than its rate of earnings. | | As stated in 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1): |
| | |
| On March 30, 2011, SCE provided the escalation decommissioning costs for site specific decommissioning and the rate of earnings for each joint owner of SONGS 2 and 3. | |
| | |
| As stated in 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1): | |
| | |
| [T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] the assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections. . . | | [T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] the assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections. . . |
| SCE Response: | | SCE Response: |
| SCE and SDG&E's escalation rates for "other" costs pertain to labor and non-labor costs, but not to burial costs. They were both ordered by the CPUC to assume an escalation rate of 6.93% for burial costs, as discussed in the response to RAI No. 3, above. Anaheim and Riverside are not regulated by the CPUC, therefore, they assumed composite escalation rates that include labor, non-labor, and burial costs. | | SCE and SDG&Es escalation rates for other costs pertain to labor and non-labor costs, but not to burial costs. They were both ordered by the CPUC to assume an escalation rate of 6.93% for burial costs, as discussed in the response to RAI No. 3, above. Anaheim and Riverside are not regulated by the CPUC, therefore, they assumed composite escalation rates that include labor, non-labor, and burial costs. |
| | | SCE calculated the composite escalation rate of 2.78% for all San Onofre co-owners that was reported in SCEs March 30, 2011 Decommissioning Funding Status Report based on the escalation rates that each co-owner provided and their respective shares of the decommissioning liability for SONGS 2 and 3. In response to this RAI, the City of Riverside 4 of 6 |
| SCE calculated the composite escalation rate of 2.78% for all San Onofre co-owners that was reported in SCE's March 30, 2011 Decommissioning Funding Status Report based on the escalation rates that each co-owner provided and their respective shares of the decommissioning liability for SONGS 2 and 3. In response to this RAI, the City of Riverside 5 of 6 revised its escalation rate to 2.32%. Because Riverside has only a 1.79% share of the decommissioning liability for SONGS 2 and 3, and therefore, this change would have a negligible effect upon the composite escalation rate, SCE did not re-calculate the composite rate to reflect this change. | |
| RAI No. 5: Annual collections:
| |
| Indicate whether SCE and its joint owners will have future collections into the trust funds. If so, provide a breakdown of the annual decommissioning contributions that will be accumulated for only radiological decommissioning costs.
| |
|
| |
|
| | revised its escalation rate to 2.32%. Because Riverside has only a 1.79% share of the decommissioning liability for SONGS 2 and 3, and therefore, this change would have a negligible effect upon the composite escalation rate, SCE did not re-calculate the composite rate to reflect this change. |
| | RAI No. 5: Annual collections: |
| | Indicate whether SCE and its joint owners will have future collections into the trust funds. If so, provide a breakdown of the annual decommissioning contributions that will be accumulated for only radiological decommissioning costs. |
| Within the March 30, 2011, DFS report, SCE included the contributions for the year 2011, but does not indicate if there are future contributions. | | Within the March 30, 2011, DFS report, SCE included the contributions for the year 2011, but does not indicate if there are future contributions. |
| As stated under 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1): | | As stated under 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1): |
| | |
| [T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] a schedule of the annual amounts remaining to be collected. . . | | [T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] a schedule of the annual amounts remaining to be collected. . . |
| SCE Response: | | SCE Response: |
| | Annual contributions for SCE and SDG&E are authorized by the CPUC in Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceedings. The current annual collection amounts were established in CPUC Decision 10-07-047 on July 29, 2010. These annual collection amounts will continue until the CPUC issues its decision for the next triennial proceeding, when they will likely be adjusted to reflect then-current decommissioning cost estimates, trust fund balances, and financial assumptions. Annual contributions for Anaheim and Riverside are funded through the cities municipal utility rate-setting processes. SCE actively monitors their trust fund accumulations to ensure that their respective shares of San Onofre decommissioning costs will be adequately funded. |
| | RAI No. 6: Citation for Site-Specific Study: |
| | Provide the site-specific cost estimate for SONGS 2 and 3, unless it was previously submitted to NRC. If the cost estimate was previously submitted to NRC, then provide a reference to its submittal. The site-specific cost estimate should include a summary schedule of annual expenses, projected earnings, and end-of-year fund balances, expressed in 2010 dollars. |
| | On March 30, 2011, SCE provided a site-specific cost estimate for the amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required in 2009 dollars, but did not include the cost escalation factor(s) that would be used to escalate the site-specific cost estimate to 2010 dollars. |
| | Per 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i) and (ii), the licensee must specifically describe the safe storage period in order to take credit for projected future earnings when it uses a site-specific estimate as the basis for using the prepayment or external sinking fund methods of financial assurance. |
| | 5 of 6 |
|
| |
|
| Annual contributions for SCE and SDG&E are authorized by the CPUC in Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceedings. The current annual collection amounts were established in CPUC Decision 10-07-047 on July 29, 2010. These annual collection amounts will continue until the CPUC issues its decision for the next triennial proceeding, when they will likely be adjusted to reflect then-current decommissioning cost estimates, trust fund balances, and financial assumptions. Annual contributions for Anaheim and Riverside are funded through the cities' municipal utility rate-setting processes. SCE actively monitors their trust fund accumulations to ensure that their respective shares of San Onofre decommissioning costs will be adequately funded.
| | SCE Response: |
| | | SCEs calculations of the site specific decommissioning cost estimate (license termination costs) are provided below: |
| RAI No. 6: Citation for Site-Specific Study:
| | From ABZ SONGS 2 & 3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate dated February 2009 2008 $ Unit 2 Unit 3 Total License Termination Costs $1,087,572 $1,075,602 $2,163,174 Fuel Storage Costs $365,536 $469,413 $834,949 Site Restoration Costs $337,800 $322,883 $660,683 Total Decommissioning Costs $1,790,908 $1,867,898 $3,658,806 License Termination Costs $1,148,770 $1,136,126 $2,284,896 Escalated to 2010 $ |
| Provide the site-specific cost estimate for SONGS 2 and 3, unless it was previously submitted to NRC. If the cost estimate was previously submitted to NRC, then provide a reference to its submittal. The site-specific cost estimate should include a summary schedule of annual expenses, projected earnings, and end-of-year fund balances, expressed in 2010 dollars.
| | The ABZ SONGS 2 & 3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate is not accessible on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) website. The CPUC website, however, contains several documents in which the $3,658,806 decommissioning cost estimate for SONGS 2 & 3 was discussed. These include the Joint Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) for the 2009 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding to Set Contribution Levels for the Companies Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds and Address Other Related Decommissioning Issues, Application A.09-04-009, filed on April 3, 2009, (see item 3 on page 2 of http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/efile/A/99449.pdf), and Decision on Phase 1 of the Triennial Review of Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts and Related Decommissioning Activities for Southern California Edison Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Decision D.10-07-047, issued on July 29, 2010, (see Conclusion of Law No. 4 on pages 54-55 of http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/FINAL_DECISION/121644.pdf). |
| | | 6 of 6}} |
| On March 30, 2011, SCE provided a site-specific cost estimate for the amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required in 2009 dollars, but did not include the cost escalation factor(s) that would be used to escalate the site-specific cost estimate to 2010 dollars.
| |
| | |
| Per 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i) and (ii), the licensee must specifically describe the safe storage period in order to take credit for projected future earnings when it uses a site-specific estimate as the basis for using the prepayment or external sinking fund methods of financial assurance.
| |
| 6 of 6 SCE Response:
| |
| SCE's calculations of the site specific decommissioning cost estimate (license termination costs) are provided below:
| |
| From ABZ SONGS 2 & 3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate dated February 2009 2008 $ Unit 2 Unit 3 Total License Termination Costs $1,087,572$1,075,602$2,163,174Fuel Storage Costs $365,536$469,413$834,949 Site Restoration Costs $337,800 | |
| $322,883$660,683Total Decommissioning Costs $1,790,908$1,867,898$3,658,806License Termination Costs $1,148,770$1,136,126 | |
| $2,284,896Escalated to 2010 $
| |
| The ABZ SONGS 2 & 3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate is not accessible on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) website. The CPUC website, however, contains several documents in which the $3,658,806 decommissioning cost estimate for SONGS 2 & 3 was discussed. These include the Joint Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) for the 2009 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding to Set Contribution Levels for the Companies' Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds and Address Other Related Decommissioning Issues, Application A.09-04-009, filed on April 3, 2009, (see item 3 on page 2 of http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/efile/A/99449.pdf), and Decision on Phase 1 of the Triennial Review of Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts and Related Decommissioning Activities for Southern California Edison Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Decision D.10-07-047, issued on July 29, 2010, (see Conclusion of Law No. 4 on pages 54-55 of http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/FINAL_DECISION/121644.pdf | |
| ).}} | |
|
---|
Category:Decommissioning Funding Plan DKTs 30
MONTHYEARML23094A1272023-03-29029 March 2023 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 ML22084A0552022-03-23023 March 2022 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8Xv and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML21091A0372021-03-24024 March 2021 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Funding Status Report 2020 ML20079J0322020-03-17017 March 2020 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) - Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2019 ML19088A0492019-03-29029 March 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Reports ML19087A3032019-03-14014 March 2019 Southern California Edison 050-00206; 050-00361; 050-00362; 072-00041 Decommissioning Status ML19081A1192019-03-14014 March 2019 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v-vii) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2018 ML18082A3672018-03-20020 March 2018 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Cy 2017 ML17271A0532017-09-29029 September 2017 2017 Summary of Annual Decommissioning Funding Status Reports for Reactors in Decommissioning ML17090A1522017-03-28028 March 2017 ISFSI -10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v), 10 CFR 50.82 (8)(vii), and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML16095A2382016-03-31031 March 2016 Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML15349A9422015-12-14014 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan ML14092A3652014-03-31031 March 2014 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML14092A3642014-03-31031 March 2014 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v-vii) Decommissioning Funding Status Report, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 ML14078A0282014-03-12012 March 2014 Access to Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds ML14051A6322014-02-13013 February 2014 Access to Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds ML13176A3732013-06-21021 June 2013 LTR-13-0546 - Don Leichtling Email San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Decommissioning ML13091A0732013-03-27027 March 2013 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML13091A0802013-03-27027 March 2013 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML1304203842012-12-14014 December 2012 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan ML12248A2732012-08-31031 August 2012 Response to Request for Additional Information Decommissioning Funding ML12090A5342012-03-29029 March 2012 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 ML1117901302011-06-27027 June 2011 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1117914712011-06-27027 June 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information on the 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1009101302010-03-31031 March 2010 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0909904282009-03-31031 March 2009 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0909904292009-03-31031 March 2009 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0808805042008-03-26026 March 2008 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0709306052007-03-30030 March 2007 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0605902622006-02-23023 February 2006 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0507701302005-03-15015 March 2005 Decommissioning Funding Report ML0308602972003-03-25025 March 2003 Decommissioning Funding Report as of December 31, 2002 ML0308603052003-03-25025 March 2003 Unit, 1.10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0208704392002-03-25025 March 2002 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report 2023-03-29
[Table view] Category:40
MONTHYEARML23094A1272023-03-29029 March 2023 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 ML22084A0552022-03-23023 March 2022 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8Xv and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML21091A0372021-03-24024 March 2021 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Funding Status Report 2020 ML20136A3392020-05-0707 May 2020 Updated Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report and Irradiated Fuel Management Plan ML20079J0322020-03-17017 March 2020 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) - Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2019 ML19088A0492019-03-29029 March 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Reports ML19087A3032019-03-14014 March 2019 Southern California Edison 050-00206; 050-00361; 050-00362; 072-00041 Decommissioning Status ML19081A1192019-03-14014 March 2019 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v-vii) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2018 ML18082A3672018-03-20020 March 2018 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Cy 2017 ML17271A0532017-09-29029 September 2017 2017 Summary of Annual Decommissioning Funding Status Reports for Reactors in Decommissioning ML17090A1522017-03-28028 March 2017 ISFSI -10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v), 10 CFR 50.82 (8)(vii), and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML16095A2382016-03-31031 March 2016 Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML15349A9422015-12-14014 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan ML15236A0182015-08-20020 August 2015 Amendment Applications 270 and 255, Proposed Changes to Specific Regulatory Guide Commitments ML14303A6242014-10-27027 October 2014 Licensee'S Slides - SONGS PSDAR Public Meeting October 27, 2014 ML14269A0332014-09-23023 September 2014 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML14269A0342014-09-23023 September 2014 Site Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate ML14092A3652014-03-31031 March 2014 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML14092A3642014-03-31031 March 2014 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v-vii) Decommissioning Funding Status Report, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 ML14092A3142014-03-31031 March 2014 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Submittal of Amendment Application Numbers 223, 267, and 252, Permanently Defueled Emergency Plan ML14078A0282014-03-12012 March 2014 Access to Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds ML14051A6322014-02-13013 February 2014 Access to Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds ML13176A3732013-06-21021 June 2013 LTR-13-0546 - Don Leichtling Email San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Decommissioning ML13091A0732013-03-27027 March 2013 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML13091A0802013-03-27027 March 2013 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML1304203842012-12-14014 December 2012 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan ML12248A2732012-08-31031 August 2012 Response to Request for Additional Information Decommissioning Funding ML12090A5342012-03-29029 March 2012 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 ML11251A0942011-07-29029 July 2011 Attachment 1, Volume 1, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station - Improved Technical Specifications Conversion - ITS Chapter 1.0, Use and Application ML1117914712011-06-27027 June 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information on the 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1117901302011-06-27027 June 2011 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1009101302010-03-31031 March 2010 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0909904282009-03-31031 March 2009 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0909904292009-03-31031 March 2009 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0808805042008-03-26026 March 2008 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0709306052007-03-30030 March 2007 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0605902622006-02-23023 February 2006 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0507701302005-03-15015 March 2005 Decommissioning Funding Report ML0435704812004-12-23023 December 2004 SONGS Units 2 & 3 - Issuance of Amendments on Equipment Hatch Open During Refueling Operations ML0308602972003-03-25025 March 2003 Decommissioning Funding Report as of December 31, 2002 ML0308603052003-03-25025 March 2003 Unit, 1.10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0208704392002-03-25025 March 2002 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report 2023-03-29
[Table view] Category:50
MONTHYEARML23094A1272023-03-29029 March 2023 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 ML22084A0552022-03-23023 March 2022 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8Xv and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML21091A0372021-03-24024 March 2021 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Funding Status Report 2020 ML20136A3392020-05-0707 May 2020 Updated Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report and Irradiated Fuel Management Plan ML20079J0322020-03-17017 March 2020 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) - Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2019 ML19088A0492019-03-29029 March 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Reports ML19087A3032019-03-14014 March 2019 Southern California Edison 050-00206; 050-00361; 050-00362; 072-00041 Decommissioning Status ML19081A1192019-03-14014 March 2019 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v-vii) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2018 ML18082A3672018-03-20020 March 2018 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Cy 2017 ML17271A0532017-09-29029 September 2017 2017 Summary of Annual Decommissioning Funding Status Reports for Reactors in Decommissioning ML17090A1522017-03-28028 March 2017 ISFSI -10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v), 10 CFR 50.82 (8)(vii), and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML16095A2382016-03-31031 March 2016 Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML15349A9422015-12-14014 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan ML14303A6242014-10-27027 October 2014 Licensee'S Slides - SONGS PSDAR Public Meeting October 27, 2014 ML14269A0332014-09-23023 September 2014 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML14269A0342014-09-23023 September 2014 Site Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate ML14092A3652014-03-31031 March 2014 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML14092A3642014-03-31031 March 2014 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v-vii) Decommissioning Funding Status Report, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 ML14078A0282014-03-12012 March 2014 Access to Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds ML14051A6322014-02-13013 February 2014 Access to Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds ML13176A3732013-06-21021 June 2013 LTR-13-0546 - Don Leichtling Email San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Decommissioning ML13091A0732013-03-27027 March 2013 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML13091A0802013-03-27027 March 2013 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML1304203842012-12-14014 December 2012 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan ML12248A2732012-08-31031 August 2012 Response to Request for Additional Information Decommissioning Funding ML12090A5342012-03-29029 March 2012 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 ML1117914712011-06-27027 June 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information on the 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1117901302011-06-27027 June 2011 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1009101302010-03-31031 March 2010 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0909904282009-03-31031 March 2009 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0909904292009-03-31031 March 2009 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0808805042008-03-26026 March 2008 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0709306052007-03-30030 March 2007 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0605902622006-02-23023 February 2006 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0507701302005-03-15015 March 2005 Decommissioning Funding Report ML0308602972003-03-25025 March 2003 Decommissioning Funding Report as of December 31, 2002 ML0308603052003-03-25025 March 2003 Unit, 1.10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0208704392002-03-25025 March 2002 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report 2023-03-29
[Table view] Category:70
MONTHYEARML23094A1272023-03-29029 March 2023 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 ML22084A0552022-03-23023 March 2022 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8Xv and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML21091A0372021-03-24024 March 2021 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Funding Status Report 2020 ML20136A3392020-05-0707 May 2020 Updated Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report and Irradiated Fuel Management Plan ML20079J0322020-03-17017 March 2020 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) - Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2019 ML19088A0492019-03-29029 March 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Reports ML19087A3032019-03-14014 March 2019 Southern California Edison 050-00206; 050-00361; 050-00362; 072-00041 Decommissioning Status ML19081A1192019-03-14014 March 2019 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v-vii) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2018 ML18082A3672018-03-20020 March 2018 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Cy 2017 ML17271A0532017-09-29029 September 2017 2017 Summary of Annual Decommissioning Funding Status Reports for Reactors in Decommissioning ML17090A1522017-03-28028 March 2017 ISFSI -10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v), 10 CFR 50.82 (8)(vii), and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML16095A2382016-03-31031 March 2016 Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML15349A9422015-12-14014 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan ML15236A0182015-08-20020 August 2015 Amendment Applications 270 and 255, Proposed Changes to Specific Regulatory Guide Commitments ML14303A6242014-10-27027 October 2014 Licensee'S Slides - SONGS PSDAR Public Meeting October 27, 2014 ML14269A0332014-09-23023 September 2014 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML14269A0342014-09-23023 September 2014 Site Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate ML14092A3652014-03-31031 March 2014 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML14092A3642014-03-31031 March 2014 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v-vii) Decommissioning Funding Status Report, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 ML14092A3142014-03-31031 March 2014 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Submittal of Amendment Application Numbers 223, 267, and 252, Permanently Defueled Emergency Plan ML14078A0282014-03-12012 March 2014 Access to Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds ML14051A6322014-02-13013 February 2014 Access to Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds ML13176A3732013-06-21021 June 2013 LTR-13-0546 - Don Leichtling Email San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Decommissioning ML13091A0732013-03-27027 March 2013 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML13091A0802013-03-27027 March 2013 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML1304203842012-12-14014 December 2012 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan ML12248A2732012-08-31031 August 2012 Response to Request for Additional Information Decommissioning Funding ML12090A5342012-03-29029 March 2012 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 ML11251A0942011-07-29029 July 2011 Attachment 1, Volume 1, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station - Improved Technical Specifications Conversion - ITS Chapter 1.0, Use and Application ML1117914712011-06-27027 June 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information on the 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1117901302011-06-27027 June 2011 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1009101302010-03-31031 March 2010 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0909904282009-03-31031 March 2009 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0909904292009-03-31031 March 2009 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0808805042008-03-26026 March 2008 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0709306052007-03-30030 March 2007 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0605902622006-02-23023 February 2006 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0507701302005-03-15015 March 2005 Decommissioning Funding Report ML0435704812004-12-23023 December 2004 SONGS Units 2 & 3 - Issuance of Amendments on Equipment Hatch Open During Refueling Operations ML0308602972003-03-25025 March 2003 Decommissioning Funding Report as of December 31, 2002 ML0308603052003-03-25025 March 2003 Unit, 1.10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0208704392002-03-25025 March 2002 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report 2023-03-29
[Table view] Category:Letter
MONTHYEARML24022A1492024-01-17017 January 2024 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Revision 4 to the Physical Security Plan IR 05000361/20230062023-11-29029 November 2023 NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2023-006 and 05000362/2023-006 ML23333A0682023-11-22022 November 2023 (SONGS) Units 1, 2, 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Notification of Change in Nuclear Officer IR 05000361/20230052023-10-11011 October 2023 NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2023005 and 05000362/2023005 ML23276A5942023-09-28028 September 2023 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Supplement to Decommissioning Funding Status Reports ML23268A0922023-09-20020 September 2023 Generation Station, Units 1, 2 and 3, and the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility (ISFSI) - Re-Registration of Dry Fuel Storage Casks for Amended Certificate of Compliance No. 1040 IR 05000361/20230012023-09-13013 September 2023 NRC Inspection Report 05000361 2023-001 and 05000362 2023-004 ML23240A5372023-08-18018 August 2023 Confirmatory Survey Activities Summary and Results for the Unit 2 and 3 Intake Structures at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station San Clemente CA ML23129A1802023-06-14014 June 2023 Cover Letter to State of CA on Draft EA Regarding San Onofre ISFSI Updated DFPs IR 05000361/20230032023-05-31031 May 2023 NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2023003 and 05000362/2023003 IR 05000361/20230022023-05-23023 May 2023 NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2023-002 and 05000362/2023-002 ML23137A1032023-05-11011 May 2023 (Songs), Units 1, 2 and 3, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report ML23123A0932023-04-28028 April 2023 (Songs), Units 1, 2 and 3, Submittal of Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report - 2022 ML23230A0882023-04-10010 April 2023 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Decommissioning Quality Assurance Plan ML23094A1272023-03-29029 March 2023 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 ML23094A1332023-03-29029 March 2023 Nuclear Property Insurance ML23062A1172023-02-28028 February 2023 Generation Station Units 1, 2 and 3, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 2022 ML22361A1022023-02-24024 February 2023 Reactor Decommissioning Branch Project Management Changes for Some Decommissioning Facilities and Establishment of Backup Project Manager for All Decommissioning Facilities ML23059A2812023-02-22022 February 2023 (Songs), Units 1, 2 and 3, 2022 Annual Turtle Incidental Take Report ML23046A3792023-02-22022 February 2023 NRC Inspection Report 050-00361/2023-001 and 050-00362/2023-001 ML23045A2022023-02-0909 February 2023 Submittal of Annual Corporate Financial Reports for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Units 2 and 3 for Fy Ending June 30, 2022 ML22287A1352023-01-0505 January 2023 Issuance of Exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 72.106(B), Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Controlled Area Boundary (L-2021-LLE-0056) ML22348A0622023-01-0404 January 2023 NRC to SCE, Transmittal of the National Marine Fisheries Service'S December 12, 2022, Letter of Concurrence for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Statiion, Units 2 and 3 IR 05000206/20220062022-12-15015 December 2022 NRC Inspection Report 05000206/2022006, 05000361/2022-006, and 05000362/2022-006 ML22347A2122022-12-12012 December 2022 NMFS to NRC, Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Concurrence Letter for Decommissioning of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ML22340A6652022-12-0505 December 2022 Letter from John Fassell, Chief; Re., State of California Department of Public Health Review and Comments on SONGS Draft Environmental Assessment ML22333A8192022-11-21021 November 2022 Submittal of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3, Defueled Safety Analysis Report, Revised November 2022 IR 05000361/20220052022-11-17017 November 2022 NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2022-005 and 05000362/2022-005 ML22301A1462022-10-20020 October 2022 Report of Violations of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (Songs), Units 2 and 3 ML22277A0162022-09-29029 September 2022 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 72.106(b) IR 05000361/20220042022-09-26026 September 2022 NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2022-004 and 05000362/2022-004 ML22238A0552022-08-29029 August 2022 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission'S Analysis of Southern California Edison'S Decommissioning Funding Status Report for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 ML22234A1602022-07-31031 July 2022 Final Report Per 10 CFR Part 21, Degraded Snubber SF1154 Hydraulic Fluid Batch No. 18CLVS431 ML22207B8612022-07-26026 July 2022 NRC (Public) Inspection Report 05000361/2022003; 05000362/2022003 IR 05000361/20220032022-07-26026 July 2022 NRC Inspection Report (Public) 05000361-2022003 and 05000362-2022003 (002) IR 05000361/20220022022-05-12012 May 2022 NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2022-002 and 05000362/2022-002 ML22136A0842022-05-12012 May 2022 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, 2021 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report ML22122A0402022-04-28028 April 2022 (Songs), Units 1, 2 and 3 - Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report - 2021 ML22105A5662022-04-0505 April 2022 20053 Letter - OI Closure to Licensee - Wrongdoing Signed ML22081A1692022-03-31031 March 2022 SONGS Application Acceptance Proposed Exemption from Title 10 of the CFR, Part 72.106(b), ISFSI Controlled Boundary IR 05000206/20214022022-03-24024 March 2022 Notice of Violation, NRC Inspection Report 05000206/2021402, 05000361/2021402, 05000362/2021402, and 07200041/2021401; and Investigation Report 4-2021-004- Public- Cover Letter ML22084A0552022-03-23023 March 2022 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8Xv and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation IR 05000361/20220012022-03-14014 March 2022 NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2022-001; 05000362/2022-001 ML22066B0242022-03-0303 March 2022 (Songs), Units 1, 2, and 3, and the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Revision 2 to the ISFSI-Only Emergency Plan and Associated Changes to Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures ML22062B0282022-02-28028 February 2022 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (Isfsi), Response to Request for Supplemental Information Regarding Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 72.106(b) ML22059B0392022-02-25025 February 2022 International, Proprietary Information to Support SCE Exemption ML22060A1132022-02-24024 February 2022 Nuclear Property Insurance ML22060A1152022-02-24024 February 2022 Generation Station Units 1, 2 and 3, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 2021 ML22048B4972022-02-15015 February 2022 (Songs), Units 1, 2 and 3 - 2021 Annual Turtle Incidental Take Report ML22031A1112022-01-26026 January 2022 (Songs), Units 2 and 3 - Annual Corporate Financial Reports 2024-01-17
[Table view] Category:Status Report
MONTHYEARML23276A5942023-09-28028 September 2023 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Supplement to Decommissioning Funding Status Reports ML23094A1272023-03-29029 March 2023 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 ML22084A0552022-03-23023 March 2022 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8Xv and VII) and 10 CFR 72.30(c) Decommissioning Funding Status Report 2021 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML21091A0372021-03-24024 March 2021 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Funding Status Report 2020 ML18082A3672018-03-20020 March 2018 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Cy 2017 ML13240A1302013-08-26026 August 2013 Request for Relaxation of Commission Order No. EA-12-049 & EA-12-051 and First 6 Months Status Report on Implementation of EA-12-049 & EA-12-051 ML13091A0732013-03-27027 March 2013 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML12199A0542012-07-16016 July 2012 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML1214500142012-05-23023 May 2012 NFPA 805 LAR Status Matrix - May 2012 ML12024A3762011-12-28028 December 2011 State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses, Current Status and Next Steps ML1117901302011-06-27027 June 2011 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1117914712011-06-27027 June 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information on the 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML1009101302010-03-31031 March 2010 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0808805042008-03-26026 March 2008 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0709306052007-03-30030 March 2007 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report ML0409201222004-03-29029 March 2004 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Status of Decommissioning Funding ML0224007982002-02-0101 February 2002 E-mail from Beth Wetzel Bulletin 2001-01 Status Report ML0224007812002-01-18018 January 2002 E-mail from Jacob Zimmerman, Bulletin 2001-01 Status Report 2023-09-28
[Table view] |
Text
I ~I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Richard J. St. Onge
~ EDISON Director Nu"cIear Regulatory Affairs An EDIS ON INTER NA TIO NAL Company 10CFR50.75 June 27, 2011 u.s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN : Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 Response to Request for Additional Information on the 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Status Report
Reference:
Letter from Richard J. St Onge (SCE) to NRC (Document Control Desk)
Dated March 30, 2011,
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Decommissioning Funding Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 By letter dated March 30, 2011 (Reference), Southern California Edison submitted the Decommissioning Funding Status Report for San Onofre Units 2 and 3. Bye-mail dated May 10, 2011 , the NRC requested additional information. Responses to the NRC request for additional information are provided in the Enclosure to this letter.
There are no new commitments contained in this letter.
Should you have any questions, please contact Ms. Linda T. Conklin at (949) 368-9443 .
Sincerely,
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information on the 2011 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 cc: E. E. Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV R. Hall, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 G. G. Warnick, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 P.O. Box 128 San Clemente , CA 92674
Enclosure Responses to Request for Additional Information on San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Decommissioning Funding Status Report
RESPONSES TO NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE SAN ONOFRE UNITS 2 AND 3 DECOMMISIONING FUNDING STATUS REPORT RAI No. 1: Minimum DFA calculation:
Provide the labor, energy, and burial factors used in the calculation of the minimum requirement for decommissioning financial assurance and, if necessary, a corrected submittal for that part of the DFS report.
On March 30, 2011, SCE reported an amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c) less than the amount calculated by the NRC staff.
According to 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), the amount provided in the DFS report should be the amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c).
The formulas for the factors used by the staff can be found using NUREG-1307, Rev. 14, Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities. For example, the calculations for the Labor and Energy Adjustment Factors can be found on pages 7 and 8 of NUREG-1307, Rev. 14.
SCE Response:
SCEs calculations of the minimum financial assurance amounts were based on NUREG-1307, Rev. 14. SCEs labor, energy, and burial factors, and associated calculations, are provided below:
1 of 6
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 Minimum Decommissioning Amount Calculations 100% Plant Share - 12/31/2010 Amount Step Factor Millions Basis A Initial Minimum Amount (per unit) 105.0 10 CFR 50.75(c) Formula (>3400 MWT)
B Base Lx Dec. 2005, West Region 2.06 NUREG-1307, Rev. 14, Table 3.2 C Labor Composite Q4 2010 Value 112.500 BLS CIU2010000000240I D Labor Escalation Factor 2.318 Steps C
- B / 100 E Labor Weighting Factor @ 65% 1.506 Step D
F Labor Adjustment $158.1 Steps A *E G Power Factor (1/86) Value, Reg Guide 114.200 BLS WPU0543 H Power End of Year 2010 Value 193.300 BLS WPU0543 I Power Escalation Factor 1.693 Steps H / G J Power Weighting Factor @ 58% 0.982 Step I
K Fuel Factor (1/86) Value, Reg Guide 82.000 L Fuel End of Year 2010 Value 224.300 BLS WPU0573 (preliminary)
M Fuel Escalation Factor 2.735 Steps L / K N Fuel Weighting Factor @ 42% 1.149 Step M
O Energy Escalation Factor 2.131 Steps J + N P Energy Weighting Factor @ 13% 0.277 Step O
Q Energy Adjustment $29.1 Steps A
- P R Bx 2010 Value, NUREG-1307 Rev. 14, 12.280 Table 2.1, NUREG-1307 Rev. 14 Generic Site S Burial Weighting Factor @ 22% 2.702 Step R
T Burial Adjustment $283.7 Steps A
- S Total Escalation Adjustments $470.9 Sum Steps F + Q + T The calculation of the Minimum Decommissioning Amount for SONGS Unit 3 is identical.
2 of 6
RAI No. 2: Reporting requirements:
SCE should indicate whether there are any material changes to the trust agreements from the last submittal.
On March 30, 2011, SCE reported that none of the licensees were relying on any contracts pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(v) and that there were no modifications to their method of providing financial assurance. However, SCE did not indicate if there were any material changes to the trust agreements from the last submittal. As stated under 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1):
[T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] any contracts upon which the licensee is relying under paragraph (e)(1)(v) of this section; any modifications occurring to a licensees current method of providing financial assurance since the last submitted report; and any material changes to trust agreements. . .
SCE Response:
There were no material changes to SCEs nuclear decommissioning trust agreements since the last submittal.
RAI No. 3: Citation for real rate of returns:
Provide the citation(s) (e.g, an Order by the rate-regulatory authority) by the regulatory entity that allows for the assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rate of earnings on decommissioning funds and rates of other factors assumed in your DFS report. On March 30, 2011, SCE reported the following for the joint owners of SONGS 2 and 3:
SCE:
6.93 percent rate of escalation in burial costs, 2.32 percent rate of escalation in other costs, and 4.46 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds.
San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E):
6.93 percent rate of escalation in burial costs, 2.32 percent rate of escalation in other costs, and 4.14 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds.
City of Anaheim (Anaheim):
4 percent rate of escalation in decommissioning costs, 4 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds.
City of Riverside (Riverside):
4 percent rate of escalation in decommissioning costs, 3.87 percent rate of earnings on decommissioning funds.
3 of 6
As stated in 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1),
[T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] the assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections. . .
SCE Response:
The 6.93% escalation rate for burial costs used by SCE and SDG&E was approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in Decision 10-07-047.
Annual contribution amounts to each San Onofre co-owners decommissioning trusts are based on assumed rates of escalation in decommissioning costs and rates of earnings on decommissioning funds that are approved by a rate-regulatory authority. In addition, each San Onofre co-owner annually updates its decommissioning cost escalation rate and decommissioning fund rate of return assumptions independent of regulatory rate-setting proceedings for decommissioning funding. SCE reported the updated rates assumed by each San Onofre co-owner as of December 31, 2010.
RAI No. 4: Rate of escalation clarification:
Clarify which escalation costs are attributable to radiological costs associated for radiological decommissioning. Define what other costs imply and why Riverside and Anaheim do not have such a breakdown. Also, clarify for the NRC staffs review, why Riverside has an escalation factor higher than its rate of earnings.
On March 30, 2011, SCE provided the escalation decommissioning costs for site specific decommissioning and the rate of earnings for each joint owner of SONGS 2 and 3.
As stated in 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1):
[T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] the assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections. . .
SCE Response:
SCE and SDG&Es escalation rates for other costs pertain to labor and non-labor costs, but not to burial costs. They were both ordered by the CPUC to assume an escalation rate of 6.93% for burial costs, as discussed in the response to RAI No. 3, above. Anaheim and Riverside are not regulated by the CPUC, therefore, they assumed composite escalation rates that include labor, non-labor, and burial costs.
SCE calculated the composite escalation rate of 2.78% for all San Onofre co-owners that was reported in SCEs March 30, 2011 Decommissioning Funding Status Report based on the escalation rates that each co-owner provided and their respective shares of the decommissioning liability for SONGS 2 and 3. In response to this RAI, the City of Riverside 4 of 6
revised its escalation rate to 2.32%. Because Riverside has only a 1.79% share of the decommissioning liability for SONGS 2 and 3, and therefore, this change would have a negligible effect upon the composite escalation rate, SCE did not re-calculate the composite rate to reflect this change.
RAI No. 5: Annual collections:
Indicate whether SCE and its joint owners will have future collections into the trust funds. If so, provide a breakdown of the annual decommissioning contributions that will be accumulated for only radiological decommissioning costs.
Within the March 30, 2011, DFS report, SCE included the contributions for the year 2011, but does not indicate if there are future contributions.
As stated under 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1):
[T]he information in [the DFS] report must include [. . .] a schedule of the annual amounts remaining to be collected. . .
SCE Response:
Annual contributions for SCE and SDG&E are authorized by the CPUC in Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceedings. The current annual collection amounts were established in CPUC Decision 10-07-047 on July 29, 2010. These annual collection amounts will continue until the CPUC issues its decision for the next triennial proceeding, when they will likely be adjusted to reflect then-current decommissioning cost estimates, trust fund balances, and financial assumptions. Annual contributions for Anaheim and Riverside are funded through the cities municipal utility rate-setting processes. SCE actively monitors their trust fund accumulations to ensure that their respective shares of San Onofre decommissioning costs will be adequately funded.
RAI No. 6: Citation for Site-Specific Study:
Provide the site-specific cost estimate for SONGS 2 and 3, unless it was previously submitted to NRC. If the cost estimate was previously submitted to NRC, then provide a reference to its submittal. The site-specific cost estimate should include a summary schedule of annual expenses, projected earnings, and end-of-year fund balances, expressed in 2010 dollars.
On March 30, 2011, SCE provided a site-specific cost estimate for the amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required in 2009 dollars, but did not include the cost escalation factor(s) that would be used to escalate the site-specific cost estimate to 2010 dollars.
Per 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i) and (ii), the licensee must specifically describe the safe storage period in order to take credit for projected future earnings when it uses a site-specific estimate as the basis for using the prepayment or external sinking fund methods of financial assurance.
5 of 6
SCE Response:
SCEs calculations of the site specific decommissioning cost estimate (license termination costs) are provided below:
From ABZ SONGS 2 & 3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate dated February 2009 2008 $ Unit 2 Unit 3 Total License Termination Costs $1,087,572 $1,075,602 $2,163,174 Fuel Storage Costs $365,536 $469,413 $834,949 Site Restoration Costs $337,800 $322,883 $660,683 Total Decommissioning Costs $1,790,908 $1,867,898 $3,658,806 License Termination Costs $1,148,770 $1,136,126 $2,284,896 Escalated to 2010 $
The ABZ SONGS 2 & 3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate is not accessible on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) website. The CPUC website, however, contains several documents in which the $3,658,806 decommissioning cost estimate for SONGS 2 & 3 was discussed. These include the Joint Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) for the 2009 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding to Set Contribution Levels for the Companies Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds and Address Other Related Decommissioning Issues, Application A.09-04-009, filed on April 3, 2009, (see item 3 on page 2 of http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/efile/A/99449.pdf), and Decision on Phase 1 of the Triennial Review of Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts and Related Decommissioning Activities for Southern California Edison Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Decision D.10-07-047, issued on July 29, 2010, (see Conclusion of Law No. 4 on pages 54-55 of http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/FINAL_DECISION/121644.pdf).
6 of 6