NUREG-1307, Rev. 20, Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities Final Report

From kanterella
(Redirected from NUREG-1307)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NUREG-1307, Rev. 20, Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities Final Report
ML25037A226
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/28/2025
From:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
To:
References
NUREG-1307, Rev. 20, NUREG-1307 R20
Download: ML25037A226 (1)


Text

Report on Waste Burial Charges Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities Final Report Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards NUREG-1307 Revision 20

AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at the NRCs Library at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Publicly released records include, to name a few, NUREG-series publications; Federal Register notices; applicant, licensee, and vendor documents and correspondence; NRC correspondence and internal memoranda; bulletins and information notices; inspection and investigative reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers and their attachments.

NRC publications in the NUREG series, NRC regulations, and Title 10, Energy, in the Code of Federal Regulations may also be purchased from one of these two sources:



1. The Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Publishing Office Washington, DC 20402-0001 Internet: https://bookstore.gpo.gov/

Telephone: (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104

2. The National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Road Alexandria, VA 22312-0002 Internet: https://www.ntis.gov/

1-800-553-6847 or, locally, (703) 605-6000 A single copy of each NRC draft report for comment is available free, to the extent of supply, upon written request as follows:

Address: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Administration Digital Communications and Administrative Services Branch Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: Reproduction.Resource@nrc.gov Facsimile: (301) 415-2289 Some publications in the NUREG series that are posted at the NRCs Web site address www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

doc-collections/nuregs are updated periodically and may differ from the last printed version. Although references to material found on a Web site bear the date the material was accessed, the material available on the date cited may subsequently be removed from the site.

Non-NRC Reference Material Documents available from public and special technical libraries include all open literature items, such as books, journal articles, transactions, Federal Register notices, Federal and State legislation, and congressional reports.

Such documents as theses, dissertations, foreign reports and translations, and non-NRC conference proceedings may be purchased from their sponsoring organization.

Copies of industry codes and standards used in a substantive manner in the NRC regulatory process are maintained at The NRC Technical Library Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 These standards are available in the library for reference use by the public. Codes and standards are usually copyrighted and may be purchased from the originating organization or, if they are American National Standards, from American National Standards Institute 11 West 42nd Street New York, NY 10036-8002 Internet: www.ansi.org (212) 642-4900 Legally binding regulatory requirements are stated only in laws; NRC regulations; licenses, including technical specifications; or orders, not in NUREG-series publications.

The views expressed in contractor prepared publications in this series are not necessarily those of the NRC.

The NUREG series comprises (1) technical and administrative reports and books prepared by the staff (NUREG-XXXX) or agency contractors (NUREG/CR-XXXX),

(2) proceedings of conferences (NUREG/CP-XXXX),

(3) reports resulting from international agreements (NUREG/IA-XXXX),(4) brochures (NUREG/BR-XXXX), and (5) compilations of legal decisions and orders of the Commission and the Atomic and Safety Licensing Boards and of Directors decisions under Section 2.206 of the NRCs regulations (NUREG-0750), (6) Knowledge Management prepared by NRC staff or agency contractors (NUREG/KM-XXXX).

DISCLAIMER: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any employee, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third partys use, or the results of such use, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this publication, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights.

Report on Waste Burial Charges Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities Draft Report for Comment Manuscript Completed: February 2025 Date Published: February 2025 Prepared by:

S. Short and M. Toyooka Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352 E. Tabakov and R. Turtil, NRC Project Managers Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards NUREG-1307 Revision 20

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT This NUREG provides voluntary guidance for implementing the mandatory information collections in 10 CFR Parts 20 and 50 that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.). These information collections were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval numbers 3150-0014 and 3150-0011. Send comments regarding this information collection to the FOIA, Library, and Information Collections Branch (T6 A10M), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the OMB reviewer at: OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (3150-0014 and 3150-0011), Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 725 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20503.

PUBLIC PROTECTION NOTIFICATION The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.

iii ABSTRACT Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.75, Reporting and Recordkeeping for Decommissioning Planning, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requires nuclear power reactor licensees to adjust annually, in current year dollars, their estimate of the cost to decommission their plants. The annual updates are part of the process for providing reasonable assurance that adequate funds for decommissioning will be available when needed. This NUREG, which is periodically revised, describes the formula in 10 CFR 50.75(c) that is acceptable to the NRC for determining the minimum decommissioning fund requirements for nuclear power reactor licensees. This formula is based on the estimated cost of decommissioning a reference pressurized-water reactor (PWR) and a reference boiling-water reactor (BWR) in 1986, and is escalated to current year dollars using an adjustment factor provided in 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2). The primary purpose of this report is to provide the technical basis, including references, for the estimated cost of decommissioning the reference PWR and reference BWR, and to develop the escalation factor for the low-level radioactive waste (LLW) burial cost portion of the adjustment factor. Escalation factors for the other portions of the adjustment factor (i.e., labor and energy costs), are also provided in this report.

This 20th revision of NUREG-1307, Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities, contains burial cost escalation factors updated to the year 2024 for the reference PWR and for the reference BWR. As presented in Table 2-1, Values of Bx as a Function of LLW Burial Site and Year, multiple burial cost escalation factors are provided that reflect various LLW burial scenarios for each reactor type. These were developed because licensees may have the option to dispose of LLW at one or more of the four currently operating LLW disposal facilities in the United States licensed by the NRC or Agreement States, and the cost of disposal varies among each of the four facilities. In addition, there are various limitations on LLW disposal facility access by reactors, based upon the state in which the reactor is located. The different LLW burial scenarios are described in detail in Section 1.2, LLW Disposal Cost Scenarios.

The currently operating LLW disposal facilities that are licensed by the NRC or Agreement States are located in 1) Texas, 2) South Carolina, 3) Washington, and 4) Utah. The Texas, South Carolina, and Washington facilities are the host disposal sites for the Texas LLW Disposal Compact (Texas Compact), the Atlantic Interstate LLW Management Compact (Atlantic Compact), and the Northwest Compact on LLW Management (Northwest Compact),

respectively (Appendix E provides additional information about LLW compacts), and are referred to in this report as compact-affiliated disposal facilities. The Washington LLW disposal facility also accepts LLW generated in the three member-states of the Rocky Mountain LLW Compact (Rocky Mountain Compact). The fourth site (Utah) is not associated with a specific LLW compact, and so is referred to in this report as a non-compact disposal facility. Nuclear power plant facilities located within LLW compacts that have compact-affiliated disposal facilities can dispose of their LLW at the affiliated disposal facility or, in some cases, can dispose of a portion of their LLW at the non-compact disposal facility. Nuclear power plants not located within a LLW compact having a compact-affiliated disposal facility can dispose of their LLW at either the Texas or Utah disposal facilities. The Utah facility accepts only Class A LLW while the Texas compact-affiliated facility will accept Class A, B, and C LLW (see Section 1.1 for definitions of these LLW classes). For plants that have no disposal site available within their designated LLW compact, this report assumes that the cost for disposal of Class A LLW is the same as that for the Utah disposal facility, and the cost for disposal of Class B and C LLW is the same as that for the Texas disposal facility, and includes accounting for out-of-compact fees.

iv In the 2023 decommissioning fund status reporting cycle, in which licensees provided decommissioning trust fund data to the NRC by March 31, 2023, as required by 10 CFR 50.75(f), 71 of the 93 operating reactors in the U.S. applied LLW burial cost escalation factors based on the Table 2-1 scenario in which generators are located in States that do not have a compact-affiliated LLW disposal facility. In this current revision to NUREG-1307, estimated 2024 disposal costs for this scenario are approximately 9.5 percent lower for the reference PWR and 5.2 percent lower for the reference BWR compared to 2022 disposal costs. For the reference PWR and BWR, decrease in disposal costs are due to decreases in disposal fees for the Clive disposal facility.

In the same 2023 NRC reporting cycle, four of the 93 operating plants in the U.S. applied LLW burial cost escalation factors based on the Table 2-1 scenario in which compact affiliated generators used only the Texas compact-affiliated LLW disposal facility. In this current revision to NUREG-1307, the estimated 2024 disposal costs for the Texas compact-affiliated LLW disposal facility are generally unchanged for the reference PWR and BWR, compared to 2022 disposal costs.

Also, in the 2023 NRC reporting cycle, 13 of the 93 operating plants in the U.S. applied LLW burial cost escalation factors based on the Table 2-1 scenarios in which Atlantic Compact-affiliated generators used only the South Carolina compact-affiliated LLW disposal site or used a combination of both the South Carolina compact-affiliated disposal site and the non-compact disposal facility. (The South Carolina disposal site accepts LLW from facilities located in South Carolina, New Jersey, and Connecticut, all members of the Atlantic Compact.) In this current revision to NUREG-1307, estimated 2024 disposal costs using only the South Carolina compact-affiliated LLW disposal site are approximately 1.2 percent higher for the reference PWR and 1.7 percent higher for the reference BWR compared to 2022 disposal costs. The estimated disposal costs using the combination of both the South Carolina disposal site and the non-compact disposal facility are approximately 8.9 percent lower for the PWR and approximately 3.4 percent lower for the BWR compared to 2022 disposal costs. Increases in disposal costs were due to increases in charges for weight, activity (or curie), and irradiated hardware. Decrease in disposal cost using the combination of both the South Carolina disposal site and the non-compact disposal facility are due to decreases in the charges at the non-compact disposal facility.

Lastly, in the 2023 NRC reporting cycle, one of the 93 operating plants in the U.S. applied a LLW burial cost escalation factor based on the Table 2-1 scenario in which a compact affiliated generator used only the Washington disposal site. The estimated 2024 disposal cost using only the Washington disposal site, which accepts LLW from the 11 member-states of the Northwest and Rocky Mountain Compacts, are approximately 32.4 percent and 31.5 percent higher for the reference PWR and BWR, respectively, compared to 2022 disposal costs. Increases in disposal costs were due to increases in LLW volume, shipment, container, and dose rate charges.

Licensees may use the escalation factors from this NUREG in their cost analyses, or, per regulation at 10 CFR 50.75(b)(1), they may generate and report site-specific cost estimates that result in a total cost estimate of no less than the amount estimated by using the 10 CFR 50.75(c) formula and cost escalation factors presented in this NUREG. In the 2023 NRC reporting cycle, four of the 93 operating plants in the U.S. reported cost data using site-specific cost estimates.

Revision 20 to NUREG-1307 assumes that LLW generated from day-to-day plant operations would be disposed of using the licensees operating funds, and thus would not rely on

v decommissioning funds identified in the formula calculation. However, facilities located in states that are members of a LLW compact with no available LLW disposal site may be forced to provide interim storage for this waste (although most LLW could potentially be disposed of at a non-compact disposal facility, such as the facility located in Utah, or at the compact-affiliated disposal facility located in Texas). Accordingly, some of the LLW may ultimately need to be disposed of during decommissioning following interim storage. For those plants operating through extended license terms, this volume can become significant, and the disposal cost would not be accounted for in a decommissioning trust fund based on the formula calculation.

vii FOREWORD Nuclear power reactor licensees are required by 10 CFR 50.75, Reporting and Recordkeeping for Decommissioning Planning, to annually adjust the estimated decommissioning costs of their nuclear facilities to ensure adequate funds are available for decommissioning. The regulation (10 CFR 50.75(c)(2)) references NUREG-1307 as the appropriate source for obtaining the escalation factor for waste burial/disposition costs. This 20th revision of NUREG-1307 provides current, as of July 2024, waste burial/disposition costs using the compact-affiliated disposal facilities located in Andrews County, Texas; Barnwell, South Carolina; and Richland, Washington, and the non-compact disposal facility in Clive, Utah. In addition, this revision includes a disposal cost scenario that provides for disposal of low-level waste (LLW) using a combination of non-compact and compact-affiliated disposal facilities. Licensees can factor these numbers into the adjustment formula, as specified in 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2), to determine the minimum decommissioning fund requirement for their nuclear facilities. Although this NUREG is specifically prepared for the use of power reactor licensees, it also can be a valuable source of information for material licensees on current waste burial/disposition costs.

On July 1, 2000, the South Carolina disposal facility became the host disposal facility for the newly formed Atlantic Compact, comprised of the States of Connecticut, New Jersey, and South Carolina. Effective July 1, 2008, LLW from States that are not members of the Atlantic Compact was no longer accepted at the South Carolina disposal facility. The South Carolina Public Service Commission annually determines the costs of waste disposal at the South Carolina disposal facility and provides the site operator with an allowable operating margin.

The Richland, Washington facility only accepts LLW from the Northwest and Rocky Mountain Compacts. The Northwest Compact is comprised of the States of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, and Hawaii. The Rocky Mountain Compact is comprised of the States of Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico. The costs of disposal for this facility are determined annually based on waste generator volume projections and a maximum annual operator revenue set by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission. If the total operator revenue is exceeded in a given year, a rebate may be sent to the waste generator.

The Texas Compact Waste Facility (CWF), located in Andrews County, Texas, accepts LLW from both the Texas Compact and out-of-compact generators. The fees for LLW disposal are determined by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Out-of-compact generators, however, must submit an import petition to the Texas Compact Commission for approval prior to shipping. The State of Texas also limits total non-compact waste disposed at the CWF to 30-percent of licensed capacity.

Since the South Carolina and Washington LLW disposal facilities are available only to licensees located within their respective compacts, an alternative available to licensees is to dispose of decommissioning Class A LLW at a non-compact disposal facility. Costs for this scenario are based on a price quote received from the operator of the non-compact disposal facility located in Utah. Revision 20 to NUREG-1307 provides waste burial/disposition cost escalation factors for this scenario, in addition to the standard scenario of disposing of 100-percent of decommissioning LLW at a compact-affiliated disposal facility.

In addition to currently available, traditional LLW disposal alternatives using licensed facilities, staff continues to evaluate LLW disposal trends and evolving industry practices that may impact minimum decommissioning fund formula cost calculations provided for in 10 CFR 50.75. The

viii U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is aware that some LLW disposal methods, such as the disposal of very low-level radioactive waste at other-than traditional LLW sites, and other alternatives, such as may be authorized under 10 CFR 20.2002, "Method for obtaining approval of proposed disposal procedures," may be less costly than disposal at traditional LLW sites. A new section, 3.6, Low Activity Waste, is included in this revision (Revision 20), which provides information about this category of LLW and the potential for its disposal at sites other than the four currently operating LLW disposal facilities licensed by the NRC or Agreement States. The NRC plans to further evaluate this disposal alternative during the next 18 months in preparation of Revision 21 of this guidance document. As part of its evaluation, NRC will engage the public and industry, as well Tribal, Federal, and local governments, to better understand the availability of and anticipated reliance by power reactor licensees on this alternative disposal method.

Based on the outcome of its engagements and research, NRC envisions the next revision of this document to incorporate LLW burial cost escalation factor and other cost-related information associated with low activity waste disposal at other-than-traditional LLW sites.

Revision 20 to NUREG-1307 assumes that LLW generated during plant operations is disposed of using operating funds. Nuclear power plants that are members of a LLW Compact that has no disposal site available for LLW may need to provide interim storage for this waste, although most LLW may be able to be disposed of at the non-compact disposal facility located in Utah or at the compact-affiliated disposal facility located in Texas. The LLW volume could be significant for plants with extended operating periods (e.g., beyond 40-years), and the disposal cost of this additional volume would not be accounted for in a decommissioning trust fund based on the formula calculation.

For licensees with no disposal site available within their designated LLW Compact, NUREG-1307, Revision 20, assumes that the cost for disposal of Class A LLW is the same as that for the Utah disposal facility, and the cost for disposal of Class B and C LLW is the same as that for the Texas disposal facility including accounting for out-of-compact fees. Accordingly, given these considerations, licensees may want to set aside additional funds to cover associated future decommissioning costs.

Christopher Regan, Director Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, and Financial Support Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ix TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................. iii FOREWORD............................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................ xi ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS...................................................................................... xiii 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Definitions........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 LLW Disposal Cost Scenarios.......................................................................................... 2 2 DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS............................................................................... 5 3 DEVELOPMENT OF COST ESCALATION FACTORS AND COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR.................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Development of the Cost Adjustment Factor................................................................. 10 3.2 Labor Cost Escalation Factors....................................................................................... 12 3.3 Energy Cost Escalation Factors..................................................................................... 13 3.4 Waste Burial Cost Escalation Factors............................................................................ 14 3.5 Sample Calculations of Estimated Reactor Decommissioning Costs............................ 18 3.6 Low Activity Waste......................................................................................................... 20 3.7 Small Modular Reactors and Advanced Reactors......................................................... 21 4 REFERENCES....................................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX A LOW-LEVEL WASTE BURIAL/DISPOSITION PRICES FOR THE CURRENT YEAR........................................................................................... A-1 APPENDIX B CALCULATION OF LOW-LEVEL WASTE BURIAL/DISPOSITION COST ESCALATION FACTORS................................................................... B-1 APPENDIX C BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS ON THE INTERNET............................. C-1 APPENDIX D REPRESENTATIVE EXAMPLES OF DECOMMISSIONING COSTS FOR 2012 THROUGH 2024........................................................................... D-1 APPENDIX E LOW-LEVEL WASTE COMPACTS............................................................... E-1 APPENDIX F COMMENT RESOLUTION MATRIX.............................................................. F-1

xi LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Values of Bx as a Function of LLW Burial Site and Year(a)....................................... 7 Table 3-1 Evaluation of the Coefficients A, B, and C in January 1986 Dollars....................... 10 Table 3-2 Regional Factors for Labor Cost Adjustment......................................................... 13 Table 3-3 PWR Radioactive Materials and Assumptions Included in the Estimate of LLW Burial Cost..................................................................................................... 15 Table 3-4 BWR Radioactive Materials and Assumptions Included in the Estimate of LLW Burial Cost..................................................................................................... 16 Table 3-5 Clive, Utah Disposal Facility LLW Class A Categories........................................... 17 Table A-1 Price Quotes for Disposition of Class A LLW at the Non-Compact Disposal Facility Located in Clive, Utah.............................................................................. A-3 Table B-1 PWR Disposition Costs for Generators Located in States Not Affiliated with a Compact having a Disposal Facility (2024 dollars).............................................. B-4 Table B-2 BWR Disposition Costs for Generators Located in States Not Affiliated with a Compact having a Disposal Facility (2024 dollars).............................................. B-5 Table B-3 PWR Disposition Costs for Generators Located in States Not Affiliated with a Compact having a Disposal Facility (2022 dollars).............................................. B-6 Table B-4 BWR Disposition Costs for Generators Located in States Not Affiliated with a Compact having a Disposal Facility (2022 dollars).............................................. B-7 Table B-5 PWR Burial Costs at the Texas Site (2024 dollars).............................................. B-8 Table B-6 BWR Burial Costs at the Texas Site (2024 dollars).............................................. B-9 Table B-7 PWR Burial Costs at the Texas Site (2022 dollars)............................................ B-10 Table B-8 BWR Burial Costs at the Texas Site (2022 dollars)............................................ B-11 Table B-9 PWR Burial Costs at the South Carolina Site (2024 dollars).............................. B-12 Table B-10 BWR Burial Costs at the South Carolina Site (2024 dollars).............................. B-13 Table B-11 PWR Burial Costs at the South Carolina Site (2022 dollars).............................. B-14 Table B-12 BWR Burial Costs at the South Carolina Site (2022 dollars).............................. B-15 Table B-13 PWR Burial Costs at the Washington Site (2024 dollars).................................. B-16 Table B-14 BWR Burial Costs at the Washington Site (2024 dollars).................................. B-17 Table B-15 PWR Burial Costs at the Washington Site (2022 dollars).................................. B-18 Table B-16 BWR Burial Costs at the Washington Site (2022 dollars).................................. B-19 Table B-17 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Facility and the Texas Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)................................................... B-20 Table B-18 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Texas Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)...................................... B-21 Table B-19 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Facility and the South Carolina Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)..................................... B-22 Table B-20 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the South Carolina Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)........................ B-23 Table B-21 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Washington Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)............................. B-24 Table B-22 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Washington Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)............................. B-25 Table B-23 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Facility and the Texas Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)................................................... B-26 Table B-24 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Texas Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)...................................... B-27 Table B-25 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Facility and the South Carolina Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)..................................... B-28

xii Table B-26 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the South Carolina Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)........................ B-29 Table B-27 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Washington Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)............................. B-30 Table B-28 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Washington Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)............................. B-31

xiii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BIO biological BLDG building BLS U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics BWR boiling water reactor Bx LLW burial cost escalation factor CFR Code of Federal Regulations CHG charge CNS Chem-Nuclear Systems, L.L.C.

CONTAINM containment CONTAM contaminated DHEC South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control ECI Employment Cost Index EHx excess letdown heat exchanger Ex energy cost escalation factor ft3 cubic foot Fx cost escalation factor for diesel and other fuels for transportation and other heavy equipment operation gal gallon GTCC greater-than-Class C LLW ID identification number ISFSI independent spent fuel storage installation lbs pounds LLRWPAA Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 LLW low-level radioactive waste Lx labor cost escalation factor MATRL or Matl material Misc miscellaneous mR/h millirem per hour MWt megawatt-thermal NA not available NPP nuclear power plant NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P

reactor power level Px cost escalation factor for industrial electric power PNNL Pacific Northwest National Laboratory PPI Producer Price Index PWR pressurized water reactor RAD radioactive RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

xiv RCW Revised Code of Washington REACT reactor R/hr rem per hour R.Hx regenerative heat exchanger SAC sacrificial SMR small modular reactor TAC Texas Administrative Code TG turbine-generator TMI Three Mile Island Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant U.S.

United States VEN vendor

1 1

INTRODUCTION Nuclear power reactor licensees are required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.75, Reporting and Recordkeeping for Decommissioning Planning, to annually adjust the estimated decommissioning costs (in current year dollars) of their nuclear facilities to ensure adequate funds are available for decommissioning. This is one step of a multi-step process for providing reasonable assurance to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that adequate funds for decommissioning are planned for and accumulated beginning in licensing and through operations. NUREG-1307 provides escalation factors for the waste burial/disposition component of the decommissioning funding formula, as required by 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2). This NUREG also provides the regional escalation factors for the labor and energy components of the decommissioning fund requirement. Together, these escalation factors are used to adjust the NRC minimum decommissioning fund requirement by means of an adjustment factor. The term adjustment factor, as used in this NUREG and in 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2), refers to increases and decreases in estimated decommissioning costs subsequent to issuance of the 10 CFR 50.75 regulations. The base decommissioning fund requirements in these regulations were established in 1986 dollars. The adjustment factor escalates the cost, in 1986 dollars, to costs in todays dollars. This NUREG is updated periodically to reflect changes in waste burial/disposition costs and accounts for changes in the labor and energy values.

This NUREG provides the development of a formula for estimating decommissioning costs that are acceptable to the NRC. Sources of information used in the formula are identified. Values developed for the escalation of radioactive waste burial/disposition costs, by site and by year, are also provided. Licensees may use the formula, the coefficients, and the burial/disposition cost escalation factors from this NUREG in their analyses, or they may use an adjustment rate at least equal to the approach presented herein.

The formula and its coefficients, together with guidance to other data sources needed to complete the formula calculation, (i.e., U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics),

are summarized in Chapter 2. The development of the formula and its coefficients, with sample calculations, are presented in Chapter 3. Price schedules for LLW burial/disposition for the year 2024 are given in Appendix A for compact-affiliated and non-compact disposal facilities.

Calculations to determine the burial/disposition escalation factors, Bx, for each site and year of evaluation are summarized in Appendix B.

1.1 Definitions This section provides the definition of key terms utilized throughout this NUREG.

Low-level radioactive waste (LLW). LLW is a general term for a wide range of items that have become contaminated with radioactive material or have become radioactive through exposure to neutron radiation. Radioactive materials are present at nuclear power plants undergoing decommissioning as the result of plant operations prior to permanent shutdown and as the result of decommissioning activities. Examples include radioactively contaminated equipment, piping, tanks, hardware, and tools; concrete debris and soil; liquid radioactive waste (radwaste) treatment residues; and radioactively contaminated protective shoe covers and clothing; cleaning rags, mops, and filters. The radioactivity in these wastes can range from just above natural background levels to much higher levels, such as seen in components from inside the reactor vessel of a nuclear power plant. LLW from decommissioning activities is typically shipped to a disposal site specifically licensed for disposal of LLW.

2 LLW Classification. 10 CFR 61.55(a)(2) defines three classes of LLW acceptable for routine near-surface disposal based on its radiological and physical characteristics:

(i) Class A waste is waste that is usually segregated from other waste classes at the disposal site. The physical form and characteristics of Class A waste must meet the minimum requirements set forth in § 61.56(a). If Class A waste also meets the stability requirements set forth in § 61.56(b), it is not necessary to segregate the waste for disposal. (e.g., dry active waste, protective shoe covers and clothing)

(ii) Class B waste is waste that must meet more rigorous requirements on waste form to ensure stability after disposal. The physical form and characteristics of Class B waste must meet both the minimum and stability requirements set forth in § 61.56. (e.g., primary resin, primary filters)

(iii) Class C waste is waste that not only must meet more rigorous requirements on waste form to ensure stability but also requires additional measures at the disposal facility to protect against inadvertent intrusion. The physical form and characteristics of Class C waste must meet both the minimum and stability requirements set forth in § 61.56. (e.g., radioactive components)

LLW Compacts. The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 (LLRWPAA) makes each state responsible for disposing of the LLW generated within its boundaries and establishes a mechanism for states to enter into compacts to establish regional LLW disposal facilities. Appendix E identifies the compacts that have been formed and the states affiliated with each. Appendix E also identifies the states that are not affiliated with any compact.

Compact-affiliated Disposal Facility. A Compact-affiliated Disposal Facility is a LLW disposal facility that has been established by a compact in accordance with the LLRWPAA. Four compacts, representing 16 states, have established three LLW disposal facilities: (1) Northwest Compact and Rocky Mountain Compact - U.S. Ecology disposal facility located in Richland, Washington, (2) Atlantic Compact - EnergySolutions disposal facility located in Barnwell, South Carolina, and (3) Texas Compact - Waste Control Specialists disposal facility located in Andrews County, Texas.

Non-compact Disposal Facility. A Non-compact Disposal Facility is a LLW disposal facility that was established outside of the framework of the LLRWPAA and is not affiliated with a compact. An example discussed in this report is the EnergySolutions disposal facility located in Clive, Utah.

Low Activity Waste. Low Activity Waste is a subset of Class A LLW. There is no regulatory definition for this category of waste. The specific definition in terms of waste acceptance criteria is established by each disposal facility with approval by the applicable state regulator.

1.2 LLW Disposal Cost Scenarios NUREG-1307, Revision 20, contains disposal costs updated to the year 2024 for the reference pressurized-water reactor (PWR) and the reference boiling-water reactor (BWR). Updated disposal costs were developed for three scenarios reflecting alternatives by which nuclear power plant (NPP) licensees may dispose of low-level waste (LLW) generated from decommissioning activities. The first scenario assumes that 100-percent of the LLW generated during decommissioning is disposed of at one of the three compact-affiliated disposal facilities located in Washington, South Carolina, and Texas. Year 2024 LLW burial cost escalation factor

3 (Bx) escalation factors, expressed as a ratio of 2024 disposal costs to the original 1986 disposal costs, are also provided. For historical purposes, disposal costs for the reference reactors and Bx escalation factors for the year 2022 are also provided. See previous revisions of NUREG-1307 for disposal costs prior to 2022.

The second scenario provides for disposing of LLW using a combination of non-compact and compact-affiliated disposal facilities. For a PWR under this scenario, 93-percent of the LLW is assumed to be disposed of at a non-compact disposal facility (Utah) and the remaining 7-percent is assumed to be disposed of at a compact-affiliated disposal facility. For a BWR under this scenario, 95-percent of the LLW is assumed to be disposed of at a non-compact disposal facility (Utah) and the remaining 5-percent is assumed to be disposed of at a compact-affiliated disposal facility.

The third scenario provides for disposing of all LLW at non-compact disposal facilities or compact-affiliated disposal facilities that accept out-of-compact waste.

The second and third scenarios, which are considered acceptable alternatives for licensees, allow NPP licensees to take advantage of potentially lower disposal costs for much of their LLW.

Bx escalation factors for each of these scenarios are also provided.

NUREG-1307, Revision 20, assumes that LLW generated during plant operations is disposed of using operating funds. Plants that are members of a LLW Compact that has no compact-affiliated disposal site available for LLW may be forced to provide interim storage for this waste (although most LLW may be able to be disposed of at the non-compact disposal facility located in Utah or at the compact-affiliated disposal facility located in Texas). Some of this waste may ultimately need to be disposed of during decommissioning. This LLW could be significant for plants with extended operating periods (e.g., beyond 40 years), and the disposal cost of this additional volume would not be accounted for in a decommissioning trust fund based on the formula calculation.

For plants that have no disposal site available within their designated LLW Compact, NUREG-1307, Revision 20, assumes that the cost for disposal of Class A LLW is the same as that for the Utah disposal facility, and that the cost for disposal of Class B and C LLW is the same as that for the Texas disposal facility, including accounting for out-of-compact fees. As new disposal scenarios become available, they will be incorporated into subsequent revisions of NUREG-1307.

5 2

DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS The elements of decommissioning costs under 50.75(c)(2) are assigned to three categories: (1) those that are proportional to labor costs, Lx; (2) those that are proportional to energy costs, Ex; and (3) those that are proportional to burial costs, Bx. The adjustment of the total decommissioning cost estimate can be expressed by:

Estimated cost (Year X) = [1986 $ cost] [A*Lx + B*Ex + C*Bx]

where A, B, and C are coefficients representing the percent or portion of the total 1986 dollar costs attributable to labor (0.65), energy (0.13), and burial (0.22), respectively, and sum to 1.0.

The factors Lx, Ex, and Bx are defined by:

Lx = labor cost escalation factor, January of 1986 to the latest month of Year X for which data are available, Ex = energy cost escalation factor, January of 1986 to the latest month of Year X for which data are available, and, Bx = LLW burial/disposition cost escalation factor, January of 1986 to the latest month of Year X for which data are available.

For labor and energy cost escalation factors used in calculating the total decommissioning cost estimate for years subsequent to 1986, Lx and Ex are based on the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) national producer price indexes, national consumer price indexes, and local conditions for a given site (see Chapter 3).

Bx is evaluated by recalculating the costs of burial/disposition of the radioactive wastes from the reference PWR (Reference 1) and the reference BWR (Reference 2) based on the price schedules provided by the available disposal facilities for the year of interest. The results of these recalculations are presented in Table 2-1, by site and by year. These recalculations are performed by an NRC contractor.

Effective January 1, 1993, radioactive waste from states that are not members of the Northwest Compact (comprised of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, and Hawaii) or Rocky Mountain Compact (comprised of Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico) was no longer accepted at the Washington disposal site.

Effective July 1, 2000, the South Carolina LLW burial site applied different price schedules for waste from states within and outside the then newly created Atlantic Compact (comprised of South Carolina, Connecticut, and New Jersey). Effective July 1, 2008, radioactive waste from States that are not members of the Atlantic Compact was no longer accepted at the South Carolina disposal site.

Beginning in the Spring of 2012, a new LLW disposal facility became available for disposal of waste from states within the Texas Compact (comprised of Texas and Vermont). Disposal costs for this facility were included in NUREG-1307 Revision 16 for the first time.

Licensees not located in the Northwest, Rocky Mountain, Atlantic, or Texas Compacts are generators located in states not affiliated with a LLW Compact having a compact-affiliated LLW

6 disposal facility. These generators should use the Bx values for the scenario in Table 2-1 named Bx Values for Generators Located in the Unaffiliated States and those Located in Compact-Affiliated States having no Disposal Facility (see footnote (c) in Table 2-1).

Effective with Revision 15 of this NUREG (ML130223A030, January 2013), Bx values were developed for two scenarios for each of the compact-affiliated disposal sites. These are Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only and Combination of Compact-Affiliated and Non-Compact Disposal Facilities.. The Bx values for these scenarios are provided in Table 2-1 (see footnotes (d) and (e) in Table 2-1). The decision rests with the licensees to determine the scenario that best represents their particular situation.

7 Table 2-1 Values of Bx as a Function of LLW Burial Site and Year(a)

Bx Values for Washington Site Bx Values for South Carolina Site Bx Values for Texas Site(b)

Bx Values for Generators Located in the Unaffiliated States and those Located in Compact-Affiliated States having no Disposal Facility(c)

Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only(e)

Combination of Compact-Affiliated and Non-Compact Disposal Facilities(d,e)

Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only(e)

Combination of Compact Affiliated and Non-Compact Disposal Facilities(d,e)

Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only(e)

Combination of Compact Affiliated and Non-Compact Disposal Facilities(d,e)

Year PWR BWR*

PWR BWR PWR BWR*

PWR*

BWR*

PWR*

BWR PWR BWR PWR*

BWR*

2024 13.260 11.274 9.471 8.596 39.197 34.514 12.813 15.017 6.650 6.009 10.923 9.862 12.405 11.658 2022 10.013 8.571 10.526 8.865 38.742 33.934 14.067 15.550 6.650 6.014 12.229 10.497 13.711 12.296 2020 11.019 9.328 8.866 7.549 32.973 28.727 11.679 12.948 8.040 7.399 11.016 10.359 12.793 12.837 2018 10.854 9.118 8.697 7.186 32.329 28.314 11.607 12.872 8.508 8.293 11.054 10.731 12.853 13.422 (a) The values shown in this table for the years 2024 and 2022 are developed in Appendix B, with all values normalized to the 1986 Washington PWR and BWR values by dividing the calculated burial costs for each site and year by the Washington site burial costs calculated for the year 1986. Refer to previous revisions of NUREG-1307 for development of values prior to 2024.

(b) Effective with NUREG-1307, Revision 16, the Compact Waste Facility (CWF) in Andrews County, Texas, is available as a full-service (i.e., Class A, B, and C) LLW disposal facility for waste generators located in States affiliated with the Texas Compact.

(c)

Effective with NUREG-1307, Revision 16, the CWF in Andrews County, Texas, is also available as a full-service (i.e., Class A, B, and C) LLW disposal facility for waste generators located in States not affiliated with the Texas Compact. Out-of-compact generators, however, must submit an import petition to the Texas Compact Commission for approval prior to shipping. The State of Texas also limits total non-compact waste disposed at the CWF to 30-percent of licensed capacity and imposes additional fees on LLW disposed of from out-of-compact generators. With the availability of this full-service disposal facility to out-of-compact waste generators and the Clive, Utah disposal facility for any Class A LLW generated in the U.S., the Generic LLW Disposal Site scenario used in previous versions of NUREG-1307 is replaced with this scenario, which provides Bx values representing a composite of the disposal rates for these two disposal facilities. These Bx factors are recommended for use for plants that currently have no disposal site available within their designated LLW Compact.

(d) Effective with NUREG-1307, Revision 14, the bulk of the LLW is assumed to be dispositioned at the Clive, Utah disposal facility.

(e) Effective with NUREG-1307, Revision 15, the nomenclature for the two disposal scenarios was changed to Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only and Combination of Compact-Affiliated and Non-Compact Disposal Facilities to better describe these scenarios.

(*) The seven columns highlighted with an asterisk reflect Bx LLW burial cost escalation factor data used by the 89 operating power reactor licensees that utilized the minimum decommissioning fund formula in decommissioning trust fund status reports submitted to the NRC in 2023

9 3

DEVELOPMENT OF COST ESCALATION FACTORS AND COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR The minimum decommissioning fund requirement, or minimum formula amount, for radiological decommissioning of a nuclear power plant, was established using January 1986 dollars, and is defined in 10 CFR 50.75(c) as follows (where P is power level of the nuclear power reactor in megawatt-thermal (MWt))1:

For a PWR (10 CFR 50.75(c)(1)(i)) -

Greater than or equal to 3400 MWt$105 million Between 1200 MWt and 3400 MWt$(75 + 0.0088P) million (For a PWR of less than 1200 MWt, use P=1200 MWt)

For a BWR (10 CFR 50.75(c)(1)(ii)) -

Greater than or equal to 3400 MWt.$135 million Between 1200 MWt and 3400 MWt.$(104 + 0.009P) million (For a BWR of less than 1200 MWt, use P=1200 MWt)

The minimum formula amount represents an actual base-year (1986) cost estimate to decommission a nuclear power plant. These 1986 costs are derived from studies finalized in the late 1970s and early 1980s (References 6 and 7) and adjusted to 1986 dollars through addendums to these PWR and BWR documented studies (References 1 and 2).

Present day minimum formula amounts rely on an adjustment factor that is applied to the initial cost estimate. In this way, the adjustment factor accounts for, or escalates, the initial formula amount to a dollar figure that incorporates inflation and other cost escalation factors.

In 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2), the adjustment factor is defined to be at least equal to 0.65L + 0.13E +

0.22B, where L and E are cost escalation factors for labor and energy, respectively, and values are to be taken from regional BLS data, and B is a cost escalation factor for waste burial and is to be taken from this report.

In summary, the adjustment factor incorporated in 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2) provides a mechanism for escalating the decommissioning fund requirement (minimum formula amount) to current year dollars to reflect inflation and other changes in economic conditions since January 1986. This section summarizes how the coefficients (i.e., 0.65, 0.13, and 0.22) in the adjustment factor were originally developed and provides updated L, E, and B cost escalation factors for use in calculating the minimum decommissioning fund requirement in current year (2024) dollars.

1 The energy input in a heat engine is measured as MWt.

10 3.1 Development of the Cost Adjustment Factor For the purpose of adjusting the 1986 minimum decommissioning formula cost estimate into todays dollars, the NRC, working with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, determined that the total decommissioning cost could be divided into three principal components (major cost drivers) for cost escalation purposes. These components are: (1) labor, materials, and services, (2) electric power and diesel or other fuels for transportation, and (3) radioactive waste burial/disposition. The major elements contributing to each of these three components are provided in Table 3-1. The percent, or portion, of the total decommissioning cost, in January 1986 dollars, categorized as labor, materials, and services, is defined by the coefficient A. The percent, or portion, of the total decommissioning cost, in January 1986 dollars, categorized as energy and radioactive waste transportation, is defined by the coefficient B. The percent, or portion, of the total decommissioning cost, in January 1986 dollars, categorized as radioactive waste burial/disposition, is defined by the coefficient C.

Table 3-1 Evaluation of the Coefficients A, B, and C in January 1986 Dollars Reference PWR Values Reference BWR Values Cost Category 1986 $

(millions)

Coefficient 1986 $

(millions)

Coefficient Staff Labor 17.98(a) 35.12(b)

Special Equipment 1.64(a) 4.03(b Misc. Supplies 3.12(a) 3.71(b)

Specialty Contractor 12.9(a) 21.1(b)

Nuclear Insurance 1.9(a) 1.9(b)

Containers 10.9(d) 8.14(c)

Added Staff 7.5(a) 4.4(b)

Added Supplies 1.2(a) 0.2(b)

Spec. Contractor 0.78(a) 0.71(b)

Pre-engineering 7.4(a) 7.4(b)

Post-TMI-backfits 0.9(a) 0.1(b)

Environmental Surveillance 0.31(a)

License Fees 0.14(a) 0.14(b)

Subtotal 66.67 A = 0.64 86.95 A = 0.66 Energy 8.31(a) 8.84(b)

Transportation 6.08(d) 7.54(c)

Subtotal 14.39 B = 0.14 16.38 B = 0.12 Burial 22.48(d)

C = 0.22 29.98(c)

C = 0.22 Total 103.54 133.31 Note: All costs include a 25-percent contingency factor.

(a) Based on Table 3.1, NUREG/CR-0130, Addendum 4.

(b) Based on Table 3.1, NUREG/CR-0672, Addendum 3.

(c) Based on Table 5.2, NUREG/CR-0672, Addendum 3.

(d) Based on Table 6.2, NUREG/CR-0130, Addendum 4.

11 Per Table 3-1, the C (LLW burial associated) coefficient, or that percentage representing the portion of decommissioning cost attributable to LLW burial charges, are the same (.22) for both PWRs and BWRs. The A (labor associated) and B (energy associated) coefficients differ only slightly between the two reactor types. Consequently, due to the close similarity in these coefficients, and uncertainty contained within the labor and energy assessments used in developing the minimum formula, the formula in 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2) was simplified. The simplified formula is a composite of the two reactor types by averaging the A and B coefficients derived from the separate PWR and BWR estimates. Hence, the 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2) formula for determining the decommissioning cost of both PWR and BWR reactor types assume the same coefficients, as follows:

Aaverage = 0.65 Baverage = 0.13 Caverage = 0.22 All costs categorized as labor, materials, and services are escalated from 1986 dollars to current year dollars by multiplying coefficient A (0.65) by a labor cost escalation factor Lx. All costs categorized as energy and radioactive waste transportation are escalated from 1986 dollars to current year dollars by multiplying coefficient B (0.13) by an energy cost escalation factor Ex. Values for Lx and Ex for years subsequent to 1986 are based on the national producer price indexes, national consumer price indexes, and local conditions for a given site, as described below in Sections 3.2 and 3.3, respectively. All costs categorized as radioactive waste burial/disposition are escalated from 1986 dollars to current year dollars by multiplying coefficient C (0.22) by a burial cost escalation factor Bx. The values to be used in determining Bx are derived from published cost schedules at the three compact-affiliated disposal facilities and a price quote from the non-compact disposal facility located in Utah, as described in Section 3.4.

Note that values for Bx for year 2022 and earlier, are provided in Table 2-1 for information purposes only; licensees will need only the 2024 figures for the minimum formula calculation required by March 31, 2025.

In summary, a simple equation was developed and incorporated into 10 CFR 50.75(c) to determine the minimum decommissioning fund requirement, or minimum formula amount, escalated to current year dollars. This equation is as follows:

Estimated cost (Year X) = [1986 $ Cost]*(A*Lx + B*Ex + C*Bx) where:

Estimated cost (Year X) = estimated decommissioning costs in Year X (e.g., 2024) dollars,

[1986 $ Cost] = estimated decommissioning costs in 1986 dollars (base cost for PWR/BWR in 1986 dollars),

A = percent or portion (also referred to as coefficient) of the [1986 $

Cost] attributable to labor, materials, and services (0.65),

B = percent or portion (also referred to as coefficient) of the [1986 $

Cost] attributable to energy and radioactive waste transportation (0.13),

C = percent or portion (also referred to as coefficient) of the [1986 $

Cost] attributable to radioactive waste burial/disposition (0.22),

12 Lx = labor, materials, and services cost escalation, January of 1986 to latest month of Year X for which PPI data are available, Ex = energy (electricity and fuel oil) and waste transportation cost escalation, January of 1986 to latest month of Year X for which CPI data are available, Bx = Low-level waste (LLW) burial/disposition cost escalation, January of 1986 to the latest month of Year X for which data are available,

= (Rx + Sx) / (R1986 + S1986), where:

Rx = radioactive waste burial/disposition costs (excluding surcharges) in Year X dollars, Sx = summation of surcharges in Year X dollars, R1986 = radioactive waste burial costs (excluding surcharges) in 1986 dollars, and S1986 = summation of surcharges in 1986 dollars.

3.2 Labor Cost Escalation Factors In addition to costs categorized as labor, certain materials and services are also assumed to escalate at the same rate as labor and therefore included in coefficient A. Examples of these costs include container costs, certain equipment costs, insurance costs, and costs of supplies and materials. Table 3-1 provides additional examples.

Current employment cost indexes for labor (column 3,Table 3-2, below) can be obtained from the Employment Cost Indexes, published by the BLS (Reference 4). Specifically, the appropriate regional data from Table 6 of Reference 4 entitled Employment Cost Index for total compensation, for private industry workers, by bargaining status, census region and division, and metropolitan area status should be used. These indexes may also be obtained from BLS databases available on the Internet (see Appendix C for instructions).

In order to calculate the current labor cost escalation factor (Lx) for a particular region, it must be recognized that the BLS re-indexed the Employment Cost Index (ECI) in 2005, to 100.

Accordingly, two (2) BLS cost index numbers are required to calculate the current Lx value: 1) the base labor cost escalation factor in 2005 (provided below in Table 3-2), and 2) the current Employment Cost Index (ECI) from the BLS. The December 2005 base labor cost escalation factors, by region, are presented in column 2 of Table 3-2, and current ECIs, for the sake of example, are presented in column 3. The base labor cost escalation factor is the value of Lx at the time the BLS most recently re-indexed the ECI (December 2005). As such, current values of Lx (column 4) are obtained from the simple proportion:

Lx(current)/ECI(current) = Base Lx(2005)/100 For example, to calculate Lx with a 2005 base value for the Northeast region in first quarter 2024, the below formula can be used:

13 Lx/165.0 = 2.16/100 or Lx = 2.16*165.0/100 = 3.56 Table 3-2 Regional Factors for Labor Cost Adjustment Region Base Lx (Dec 2005)

Qtr 1 2024 ECI (Dec 2005 = 100)

Lx (Qtr 1 2024)

Northeast 2.16 165.0 3.56 South 1.98 161.8 3.20 Midwest 2.08 160.7 3.34 West 2.06 168.7 3.48 3.3 Energy Cost Escalation Factors The cost escalation factor for energy, Ex, is a weighted average of the following components:

industrial electric power for onsite decommissioning, Px, and diesel or other fuels for transportation and heavy equipment operation, Fx. For the reference PWR, Ex is given by:

Ex (PWR) = 0.58Px + 0.42Fx and for the reference BWR Ex is given by:

Ex (BWR) = 0.54Px + 0.46Fx These equations are derived from Table 6-3 of Reference 1 and Table 5-3 of Reference 2. The 0.58 and 0.54 coefficients for Px are calculated as the ratio of energy cost to the total energy and fuel for transportation cost for the reference PWR and BWR, respectively. The 0.42 and 0.46 coefficients for Fx are calculated as the ratio of fuel for transportation cost to the total energy and fuel for transportation cost for the reference PWR and BWR, respectively.

The current values of Px and Fx are calculated from the Producer Price Indexes (PPI), available in the PPI Detailed Report, published by the U.S. Department of Labor, BLS (Reference 5).

These indexes also can be obtained from BLS databases available on the Internet (see Appendix C for instructions). Because the energy cost category is the cost of the electricity and fuel needed to provide essential systems and services to the plant during decommissioning, the indexes used to calculate Px should be taken from data for industrial electric power (PPI Commodity Code 0543). The transportation cost category is assumed to escalate with the cost of diesel fuel or light fuel oils. The indexes used to calculate Fx should therefore be taken from data for light fuel oils (PPI Commodity Code 0573). The BLS data available for these PPI commodity codes are currently available by region.

14 Px and Fx are the values of current producer price indexes (PPI Codes 0543 and 0573, respectively) divided by the corresponding indexes for January 1986. All PPI values are based on a value of 100 for the year 1982 (base 1982 = 100). Thus, the values of Px and Fx for March 2024 (latest data available) are2:

Px = 300.3 (March 2024 value of code 0543) 114.2 (January 1986 value of code 0543) = 2.629 Fx = 360.8 (March 2024 value of code 0573) 82.0 (January 1986 value of code 0573) = 4.400 The value of Ex for the reference PWR is therefore:

Ex (PWR) = [(0.58 x 2.629) + (0.42 x 4.400)] = 3.373.

This value of Ex = 3.373 should then be used in the equation to adjust the energy cost (to March 2024 dollars) for decommissioning a PWR.

The value for the reference BWR is:

Ex (BWR) = [(0.54 x 2.629) + (0.46 x 4.400)] = 3.444.

3.4 Waste Burial Cost Escalation Factors The waste burial cost escalation factors, Bx, for the year 2024 are provided in Table 2-1 for each of the LLW disposal sites.

To calculate the Bx for a particular LLW burial site, the cost of disposal of each of the radioactive materials identified in Tables 3-3 and 3-4 for the reference PWR and BWR, respectively, was first estimated using the year 2024 price schedules provided in Appendix A of this report for each of the LLW disposal facilities. The cost of disposal for each of the radioactive materials or components was calculated based on numerous factors, including its LLW classification (e.g.,

Class A, B, and C), its weight and volume, the number of packages, the number of shipments, its activity, and its surface dose rate. The values assumed for these factors are reported in NUREG/CR-0130 and NUREG/CR-0672 (References 6 and 7), and associated Addendums 3 and 2 (References 8 and 9), respectively, and are summarized in Tables 3-3 and 3-4 for the reference PWR and BWR, respectively. For each compact-affiliated burial site and for each of the radioactive materials, the unit cost factors provided in Appendix A are multiplied by the applicable factors provided in Tables 3-3 and 3-4 to obtain estimates for each of the following cost categories as applicable: volume or base disposal charge, irradiated hardware handling charge, cask handling charge, curie charge, shipment charge, container charge, and dose rate charge. The result for each cost category for each radioactive material was summed to obtain the total estimated disposal cost for each radioactive material for each LLW burial facility. The total estimated disposal cost for each compact-affiliated LLW burial site was determined by summing the disposal costs for all radioactive materials and then multiplying this result by 2 The PPI values for industrial electric power increased by 13.3 percent and for light fuel oils decreased by 23.7 percent from NUREG-1307, Revision 19.

15 applicable factors for taxes, fees, and permits. The results were then divided by the 1986 disposal cost estimate identified in Table 3-1 to develop the year 2024 Bx factors reported in Table 2-1.

Table 3-3 PWR Radioactive Materials and Assumptions Included in the Estimate of LLW Burial Cost Radioactive Materials LLW Classification Weight (MT)

Volume (m3)

Number Packages Number Shipments Activity (Ci)

Surface Dose (R/hr)

Vessel Wall A

270 108 38 38 19,170 80 Vessel Head & Bottom A

127 113 40 40 40 0

Upper Core Support Assembly A

12 11 4

4 10 10 Upper Support Column A

11 11 4

4 100 10 Upper Core Barrel B

3 6

2 2

1,000 100 Upper Core Grid Plate C

5 14 5

5 24,310 100 Guide Tubes A

15 17 6

6 100 5

Lower Core Barrel GTCC 43 91 32 32 651,000 100 Thermal Shields GTCC 10 17 6

6 146,000 100 Core Shroud GTCC 12 11 4

4 3,431,000 100 Lower Grid Plate GTCC 4

14 5

5 553,400 100 Lower Support Column C

3 3

1 1

10,000 100 Lower Core Forging B

36 31 11 11 2,500 100 Miscellaneous Internals B

36 23 8

8 2,000 100 Biological Shield Concrete A

885 707 195 49 2,000 0

Reactor Cavity Liner A

15 14 4

1 10 0

Reactor Coolant Pumps A

341 119 8

12 78 0

Pressurizer A

88 102 8

8 5

0 Heat Exchangers, Sump Pump, Cavity Pump A

5 11 3

1 12 0

Pressurizer Relief Tank A

12 34 2

2 4

0 Safety Injection Accumulator Tanks A

139 113 8

8 81 0

Steam Generators A

1,248 605 32 32 4,400 0

Reactor Coolant Piping A

101 93 7

7 298 0

Other Containment Building A

1,780 1,490 411 101 224 0

Other Buildings A

13,695 13,510 3,709 796 184 0

Filter Cartridges B

24 9

42 6

5,000 2

Spent Resins B

82 57 20 20 42,000 60 Combustible Wastes A

122 198 930 30 233 0.2 Combustible Wastes B

122 89 420 30 525 1

Evaporator Bottoms A

384 266 94 94 13,805 50 Post-TMI-2 Additions A

190 440 121 10

<<1 0

Acronyms: GTCC - greater than Class C, MT - metric tons, Ci - curies, R/hr - rem/hour

16 Table 3-4 BWR Radioactive Materials and Assumptions Included in the Estimate of LLW Burial Cost Radioactive Materials LLW Classification Weight (MT)

Volume (m3)

Number Packages Number Shipments Activity (Ci)

Surface Dose (R/hr)

Steam Separator B

10 10 28 14 9,600 460 Fuel Support Pieces B

5 5

14 7

700 80 Control Rods & In-core Instruments C

20 15 8

8 189,000 5000 Control Rod Guide Tubes A

4 4

12 6

100 20 Jet Pump Assemblies C

6 14 40 20 20,000 840 Top Fuel Guide C

2 24 72 72 30,100 840 Core Support Plate A

19 11 31 16 650 20 Core Shroud GTCC 32 47 140 140 6,300,000 610 Reactor Vessel Wall A

158 8

22 20 2,160 20 Sacrificial Shield (neutron-activated)

A 272 90 14 14 170 0

Reactor Water Recirculation A

87 88 6

7 44 0

Sacrificial Shield (contaminated)

A 704 310 38 38 155 0

Other Primary Containment A

2,823 3,536 970 170 1,766 0

Containment Atmosphere Control A

11 48 2

1 24 0

High Pressure Core Spray A

28 17 2

2 8

0 Low Pressure Core Spray A

10 10 1

1 5

0 Reactor Building Closed Cooling A

27 32 6

2 16 0

Reactor Core Isolation Cooling A

82 13 3

1 6

0 Residual Heat Removal A

9 62 7

5 31 0

Pool Liner & Racks A

347 381 37 18 190 0

Reactor Building Contaminated Concrete A

496 434 108 28 217 0

Other Reactor Building A

619 1,419 390 46 709 0

Turbine A

1,663 1,406 278 82 702 0

Nuclear Steam Condensate A

220 363 44 13 181 0

Low Pressure Feedwater Heaters A

738 737 44 42 368 0

Main Steam A

32 71 3

2 35 0

Moisture Separator Reheaters A

417 715 26 26 357 0

Reactor Feedwater Pumps A

110 194 20 6

97 0

High Pressure Feedwater Heaters A

147 121 8

8 60 0

Other Turbine-Generator Building A

3,190 4,857 1,284 238 2,426 0

Radwaste and Control Building A

1,090 2,405 642 72 1,201 0

Reactor Building Combustible Wastes A

122 207 985 6

246 0.2 Reactor Building Combustible Wastes B

653 93 443 32 554 1

Turbine-Generator Building Combustible Wastes A

82 140 665 41 166 0.2 Turbine-Generator Building Combustible Wastes B

429 63 299 21 374 1

Radwaste and Control Building Combustible Wastes A

82 121 574 4

144 0.2 Radwaste and Control Building Combustible Wastes B

388 54 258 19 323 1

Concentrator Bottoms A

1,334 492 173 173 1,452 1

Concentrator Bottoms B

401 148 52 52 31,200 50 Filter Sludges & Spent Resins A

470 174 61 61 329 0.2 Post-TMI-2 Additions A

11 36 0

1

<<1 0

Acronyms: GTCC - greater than Class C, MT - metric tons, Ci - curies, R/hr - rem/hour

17 A similar process was followed to develop the Bx factors for the cases where a combination of compact-affiliated and non-compact disposal facilities were used. The exception is that in these cases the Class A LLW was assumed to be disposed of at the Clive, Utah disposal facility, which only has unit cost factors based on volume. The unit cost factors were applied to the Class A LLW volumes in Tables 3-3 and 3-4 based on the LLW category assumptions provided in Table 3-5 to develop the disposal estimates for each radioactive material or component.

Appendix B provides the detailed disposal cost results for each LLW burial site and compact-affiliated/non-compact-affiliated combination by radioactive material for the current NUREG-1307 revision and Revision 19.

A comparison of the year 2024 Bx factors in Table 2-1 to the corresponding year 2022 Bx factors reported in Revision 19 of NUREG-1307, shows that 1) for the compact-affiliated disposal facility cases, the values increased for the South Carolina site and Washington site and were essentially unchanged for the Texas disposal facility and 2) for the cases with a combination of compact-affiliated and non-compact disposal facilities, the values generally decreased due to decreases in disposal fees for the non-compact disposal facility. These changes are described in Appendix A.

Table 3-5 Clive, Utah Disposal Facility LLW Class A Categories PWR BWR Radioactive Materials LLW Category Radioactive Materials LLW Category Vessel Wall Oversize Debris Control Rod Guide Tubes Oversize Debris Vessel Head & Bottom Large Components Core Support Plate Oversize Debris Upper Core Support Assembly Oversize Debris Reactor Vessel Wall Oversize Debris Upper Support Column Oversize Debris Sacrificial Shield (neutron-activated)

Oversize Debris Guide Tubes Oversize Debris Reactor Water Recirculation Oversize Debris Biological Shield Concrete Oversize Debris Sacrificial Shield (contaminated)

Oversize Debris Reactor Cavity Liner Oversize Debris Other Primary Containment Oversize Debris Reactor Coolant Pumps Large Components Containment Atmosphere Control Oversize Debris Pressurizer Large Components High Pressure Core Spray Oversize Debris Heat Exchangers, Sump Pump, Cavity Pump Oversize Debris Low Pressure Core Spray Oversize Debris Pressurizer Relief Tank Oversize Debris Reactor Building Closed Cooling Oversize Debris Safety Injection Accumulator Tanks Oversize Debris Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Oversize Debris Steam Generators Large Components Residual Heat Removal Oversize Debris Reactor Coolant Piping Oversize Debris Pool Liner & Racks Oversize Debris Other Containment Building Oversize Debris Reactor Building Contaminated Concrete Oversize Debris Other Buildings Oversize Debris Other Reactor Building Oversize Debris Combustible Wastes - Class A Combustibles Turbine Large Components Evaporator Bottoms Evaporator Bottoms Nuclear Steam Condensate Oversize Debris Post-TMI-2 Additions Oversize Debris Low Pressure Feedwater Heaters Oversize Debris Main Steam Oversize Debris Moisture Separator Reheaters Oversize Debris Reactor Feedwater Pumps Large Components High Pressure Feedwater Heaters Oversize Debris Other Turbine-Generator Building Oversize Debris Radwaste and Control Building Oversize Debris Combustible Wastes - Class A Combustibles Concentrator Bottoms - Class A Evaporator Bottoms Filter Sludges & Spent Resins Oversize Debris Post-TMI-2 Additions Oversize Debris

18 Regarding changes to the disposal price schedules, the following summarizes the changes:

For the Washington disposal facility, volume, shipment disposal rates, the charges per container, dose rate charges per container, and the annual site charges increased. The fees for environmental site surveillance did not change from year 2022.

For the South Carolina disposal facility, all of the charges and surcharges increased except for the Atlantic Compact Commission administrative surcharge, which remained unchanged.

For the Utah disposal facility, the disposal rates for both solid and liquid LLW decreased from year 2022.

For the Texas disposal facility, the waste volume charge category, the maximum curie charge, the curie inventory charge, the weight surcharge category, the dose rate surcharge category, and the irradiated hardware surcharge category did not change from year 2022.

3.5 Sample Calculations of Estimated Reactor Decommissioning Costs Four sample calculations are provided in this section to demonstrate the use of the decommissioning cost equation developed above using the appropriate cost escalation factors of Lx for labor, material, and services; Ex for energy and fuel for waste transportation; and Bx for radioactive waste burial/disposition. The coefficients A, B, and C (0.65 coefficient for labor, 0.13 coefficient for energy, and 0.22 coefficient for LLW burial) used in the examples are developed in Table 3-1. Waste generators with no LLW compact disposal site availability should use the Bx values for the generic LLW disposal site scenario (i.e., the column in Table 2-1 titled Bx Values for Generators Located in the Unaffiliated States and those Located in Compact-Affiliated States having no Disposal Facility). Sample decommissioning costs for other years are provided in Appendix D.

Example 1 (No Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facilities)

Scenario Description Reactor Type: BWR Thermal Power Rating: 3,400 MWt Location of Plant: Midwest Compact LLW Disposition Preference: Non-Compact Disposal Facilities LLW Burial Location: Non-Compact Disposal Sites (Texas and Utah)

Base Cost (1986 Dollars) = $135 million [from 10 CFR 50.75(c)(1)]

Lx =

3.34 [from Table 3-2]

Ex =

3.444 [from Section 3.3]

Bx =

11.658 [from Table 2-1]

Decommissioning Cost (2024 dollars)

= ($135 million)x[(0.65)x(3.34)+(0.13)x(3.444)+(0.22)x(11.297)] = $700 million

19 Example 2 (Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only)

Scenario Description Reactor Type: PWR Thermal Power Rating: 3,400 MWt Location of Plant: Texas Compact LLW Disposition Preference: Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only LLW Burial Location: Texas Base Cost (1986 Dollars) = $105 million [from 10 CFR 50.75(c)(1)]

Lx =

3.20 [from Table 3-2]

Ex =

3.373 [from Section 3.3]

Bx =

6.650 [from Table 2-1]

Decommissioning Cost (2024 dollars)

= ($105 million)x[(0.65)x(3.20)+(0.13)x(3.373)+(0.22)x(6.650)] = $418 million Example 3 (Combination of Compact-Affiliated and Non-Compact Disposal Facilities)

Scenario Description Reactor Type: PWR Thermal Power Rating: 3,400 MWt Location of Plant: Atlantic Compact LLW Disposition Preference: Combination of Compact-Affiliated and Non-Compact Disposal Facilities LLW Burial Location: South Carolina and Utah Base Cost (1986 Dollars) = $105 million [from 10 CFR 50.75(c)(1)]

Lx =

3.56 [from Table 3-2]

Ex =

3.373 [from Section 3.3]

Bx =

12.813 [from Table 2-1]

Decommissioning Cost (2024 dollars)

= ($105 million)x[(0.65)x(3.56)+(0.13)x(3.373)+(0.22)x(12.813)] = $585 million

20 Example 4 (Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only)

Scenario Description Reactor Type: BWR Thermal Power Rating: 3,400 MWt Location of Plant: Northwest Compact LLW Disposition Preference: Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only LLW Burial Location: Washington Base Cost (1986 Dollars) = $135 million [from 10 CFR 50.75(c)(1)]

Lx =

3.48 [from Table 3-2]

Ex =

3.444 [from Section 3.3]

Bx =

11.274 [from Table 2-1]

Decommissioning Cost (2024 dollars)

= ($135 million)x[(0.65)x(3.48)+(0.13)x(3.444)+(0.22)x(11.274)] = $701 million 3.6 Low Activity Waste Some wastes generated during decommissioning have very low levels of radioactivity that pose minimal risk to people or the environment. The volumes of these wastes may be significant (e.g., hundreds of thousands of cubic feet). The radioactivity level of this waste may be so low that it may be safely disposed of in hazardous or municipal solid waste landfills. These wastes, generally referred to as low activity or very low activity waste (there is no NRC regulatory definition for this waste category), do not necessarily require the controls specified in 10 CFR Part 61. Regulations in 10 CFR Part 20 provide an approach for the NRC to approve alternative disposal methods for these wastes.

Since 2000, the NRC has approved several 10 CFR 20.2002 requests allowing for the disposal of low or very low activity waste, including hundreds of thousands of cubic feet of concrete and other demolition debris from NPPs being decommissioned (see Reference 10 for a review of several decommissioning projects that have applied the alternative disposal methods process).

NRC approved alternative methods of disposal have typically been for disposal of very low activity waste at Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle C hazardous waste disposal sites and, in a few cases, at RCRA Subtitle D municipal landfill disposal facilities where long-term controls are not in place. Although these materials could be disposed in a LLW disposal facility licensed under 10 CFR Part 61, use of alternative disposal procedures under 10 CFR 20.2002 may reduce overall risk (e.g., risk associated with increased transportation distances and associated radiological and non-radiological impacts) and may preserve disposal capacity at LLW disposal facilities for higher risk waste streams, while also providing reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety and protection of the environment.

As cited in the foreword to this document, the NRC plans to further evaluate this disposal alternative in preparation for the next revision (Revision 21) of NUREG-1307. As part of its evaluation, NRC will engage the public and industry, as well as Tribal, Federal, and local governments, to better understand the availability of and anticipated reliance by power reactor licensees on this alternative disposal method. Based on the outcome of its engagements and

21 research, NRC envisions the next revision of this document to incorporate LLW burial cost escalation factor and other cost-related information associated with low activity waste disposal at other-than-traditional LLW sites.

3.7 Small Modular Reactors and Advanced Reactors As discussed in Section 3.1, the minimum decommissioning fund requirement, or minimum formula amount, defined in 10 CFR 50.75(c) for radiological decommissioning of a NPP, was based on large (greater than 1200 MWt) PWR and BWR reactor units. Small modular reactors (SMRs) and advanced reactors are of designs that differ significantly from large PWR and BWR reactor units. Accordingly, the decommissioning fund formula in 10 CFR 50.75(c) is not anticipated to be directly applicable to SMRs and advanced reactors. The NRC is currently evaluating its approach for assessing decommissioning costs for purposes of providing decommissioning funding assurance for these types of reactors.

23 4

REFERENCES

1. Konzek G.J. and R.I. Smith, Technology, Safety, and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized-Water Reactor Power Station-Technical Support for Decommissioning Matters Related to Preparation of the Final Decommissioning Rule, (Report prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington),

NUREG/CR-0130, Addendum 4, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 1988.

2. Konzek G.J. and R.I. Smith, Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling-Water Reactor Power Station-Technical Support for Decommissioning Matters Related to Preparation of the Final Decommissioning Rule, (Report prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington), NUREG/CR-0672, Addendum 3, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 1988.

3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Report on Waste Burial Charges-Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities, NUREG-1307, Revision 8, December 1998.
4. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Cost Index, data for Series IDs CIU2010000000210I, CIU2010000000220I, CIU2010000000230I, and CIU2010000000240I obtained from http://www.bls.gov/data, data retrieved on August 8, 2024.
5. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Producer Price Index - Commodities, data for Series IDs WPU0543 and WPU0573 obtained from http://www.bls.gov/data, data retrieved on August 8, 2024.
6. Smith, R.I., G.J. Konzek, and W.E. Kennedy, Jr., Technology, Safety, and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized-Water Reactor Power Station, (Report prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington), NUREG/CR-0130, Vol. 1 and 2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1978.
7. Oak, H.D., G.M. Holter, W.E. Kennedy, and G.J. Konzek, Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling-Water Reactor Power Station, (Report prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington), NUREG/CR-0672, Vol. 1 and 2, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1980.

8. Murphy, E.S., Technology, Safety, and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized-Water Reactor Power Station-Classification of Decommissioning Wastes, (Report prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington),

NUREG/CR-0130, Addendum 3, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, September 1984.

9. Murphy, E.S., Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling-Water Reactor Power Station-Classification of Decommissioning Wastes, (Report prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington), NUREG/CR-0672, Addendum 2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, September 1984.
10. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Basis for National and International Low Activity and Very Low Level Waste Disposal Classifications, Technical Report Number 1024844, March 2012. See https://www.epri.com/research/products/1024844

A-1 APPENDIX A LOW-LEVEL WASTE BURIAL/DISPOSITION PRICES FOR THE CURRENT YEAR This appendix contains the price schedules for burial/disposition of LLW at the compact-affiliated LLW disposal facilities located in Texas, Washington, and South Carolina for the year 2024. Also provided is a price quote for the non-compact disposal facility located in Utah. These schedules are used to calculate the burial/disposition costs discussed in Appendix B.

A.1 Texas LLW Disposal Site Beginning in the Spring of 2012, a new facility located in Andrews County, Texas (which is owned by the State of Texas and operated by Waste Control Specialists [WCS]) became available for disposal of LLW from states within the Texas Compact (comprised of Texas and Vermont). The Texas facility, or Texas Compact Waste Facility (CWF), also accepts LLW from out-of-compact generators. The fees for LLW disposal are determined by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Out-of-compact generators, however, must submit an import petition to the Texas Compact Commission for approval prior to shipping. The state of Texas also limits total non-compact waste disposed at the CWF to 30-percent of licensed capacity and charges additional fees for out-of-compact LLW.

The current approved rate schedule for disposal of LLW at the CWF is provided in Section 336.1310 (Subchapter N) of Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code (TAC). This rate schedule is provided in Exhibit A-1. Effective November 8, 2018, the schedule no longer includes a separate waste volume charge for shielded Class A LLW, a Carbon-14 inventory charge, surcharges for weights less than or equal to 50,000 pounds, surcharges for dose rates less than or equal to 500 R/hour, or surcharges for shielded waste cask handling. All of the charges remained unchanged from 2022. The fees in this Exhibit A-1 are the maximum disposal rates that can be charged to in-compact generators. Fees charged to out-of-compact generators must be greater than these rates. Various established Texas fees charged to out-of-compact LLW currently amounts to an additional 31.25-percent on top of the rates shown in Exhibit A-1.

In addition, it is assumed that an additional 20-percent in fees/taxes is charged for out-of-compact LLW. As a result of the disposal fees being unchanged from Revision 19, the cost to disposition the LLW from a PWR and a BWR are generally unchanged.

A.2 South Carolina LLW Disposal Site Access to the South Carolina site by waste generators outside the Southeast Compact ended June 30, 1994, with site closure scheduled for December 31, 1995. However, effective July 1, 1995, the scheduled closure was canceled and access to the South Carolina facility was extended to all states except North Carolina. In June 2000, prohibition on waste from North Carolina was lifted.

Effective November 1, 1996, the operator of the South Carolina disposal site implemented a restructured waste disposal rate schedule. The restructured pricing is based on weight, dose rate, and curies with a cost incentive toward higher density packaging. All business after November 1, 1996, is through customer-specific contracts.

Effective July 1, 2008, out-of-compact waste was prohibited from disposal at the South Carolina disposal site.

A-2 Weight charges, curie surcharges, and irradiated hardware charges increased approximately 1.2 percent from the 2022 Atlantic Compact rates. The dose rate surcharges and Atlantic Compact Commission administrative surcharge remained constant. As a result, the cost to disposition the LLW from a PWR and a BWR increased approximately 1.2 percent and 1.7 percent, respectively, compared to 2022. The rate schedule for the South Carolina LLW disposal site, effective July 1, 2024, is presented in Exhibit A-2.

A.3 Washington LLW Disposal Site Beginning in 1993, the Northwest Compact imposed an annual permit fee on eligible (Northwest or Rocky Mountain Compact) waste generators based on the volume of waste to be shipped to the Washington site for disposal. For 2024, the permit fees range from $424 to $42,400.

Hospitals, universities, research centers, and industries pay the lower fees; NPPs pay the highest fee of $42,400. Permit fees for NPPs are included in this analysis for the years 1993 and later.

Beginning in 1994, the rate schedule for handling and disposing of heavy objects (greater than 5,000 pounds) at the Washington site was revised to recover additional crane rental costs from the waste generator. In 1996, the heavy object limit was raised to 17,500 pounds. A series of shipments of heavy objects for disposal was assumed that would minimize the crane surcharge and result in a one-time only heavy object charge.

Effective January 1, 1996, the operator of the Washington site implemented a restructured rate schedule based on waste volume, number of shipments, number of containers, and dose rate at the container surface. Each waste generator also is assessed an annual site availability charge based on cumulative volume and dose rate at the surface of all containers disposed. This restructured rate schedule was established in a settlement agreement between U.S. Ecology Washington, Inc., (the operator of the Washington disposal facility) and several large waste generators and was accepted by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission. The rate design for the restructured rate schedule was for an original period of six years, and has been renewed on this schedule since 1996. The rates are updated annually to adjust for inflation and other factors. A significant element of the rate design is the imposition of a revenue requirement that limits the profit that U.S. Ecology can earn each year. Any revenue earned in excess of this requirement must be returned to the waste generators who used the disposal facility during the year. Hence, disposal rates can vary significantly from year to year depending on the projected LLW volume and its characteristics that are received at the facility each year.

Compared with the 2022 rate schedule used in Revision 19 of NUREG-1307, the 2024 schedule reflects increases in volume rate (53.2 percent), shipment rates (35.6 percent), container rates (30.1 percent), and dose rates (about 19 percent). As a result of these rate increases, subject to the limitations described in the previous paragraph, the cost to disposition the LLW from a PWR and a BWR increased by 32.4 percent and 31.5 percent, respectively. The rate schedule for the Washington LLW disposal site, effective May 1, 2024, is presented in Exhibit A-3.

A.4 Non-compact Disposal Facilities Beginning in 2010, with Revision 14 of NUREG-1307, the EnergySolutions Clive, Utah disposal facility was explicitly included as an available, optional disposal facility for Class A LLW. This disposal facility is not associated with any of the LLW compacts and is licensed to receive Class A LLW generated from any facility in the United States. The fees for LLW disposal are

A-3 established by EnergySolutions and are not subject to review and approval by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, which is the state of Utah regulator for the Clive disposal facility.

Disposal rates for the Clive disposal facility are obtained directly from EnergySolutions via a survey. In support of Revision 20 of NUREG-1307, a similar survey was conducted. In response to this survey, a price quote to disposition the components of the reference PWR and BWR at the Utah disposal facility was obtained. Unit costs, exclusive of taxes, were provided for several different categories of components, which are provided in Table A-1. The updated rates decreased by approximately 13.5 percent for all categories, with the exception of Evaporator Bottoms, which decreased by approximately 12 percent, from the 2024 rates. These rates assume no volume discounts, which can be substantial. The development of the Bx factor for the Combination of Compact-Affiliated and Non-Compact Disposal Facilities scenario and the Non-Compact Disposal Facilities scenario was based on these rates and assumed a 10 percent tax.

Table A-1 Price Quotes for Disposition of Class A LLW at the Non-Compact Disposal Facility Located in Clive, Utah Component Class Cost Per Unit Large Components

$418 ft3 Debris

$174 ft3 Oversize Debris

$198 ft3 Resins/Filters

$550 ft3 Combustibles

$686 ft3 Evaporator Bottoms

$29 Gallon

A-4 Exhibit A-1 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Chapter 336 - Radioactive Substance Rules SUBCHAPTER N: FEES FOR LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL EFFECTIVE August 6, 2020

§336.1310. Rate Schedule.

Fees charged for disposal of party-state compact waste must be equal to or less than the compact waste disposal fees under this section. Additionally, fees charged for disposal of nonparty compact waste must be greater than the compact waste disposal fees under this section.

Figure: 30 TAC §336.13101 Disposal Rate for the Compact Waste Disposal Facility

1. Base Disposal Charge:

1A. Waste Volume Charge Charge per cubic foot

($/ft3)

Class A LLW

$100 Class B and C LLW

$1,000 Sources - Class A

$500 1B. Radioactivity Charge Curie Inventory Charge ($/mCi)

$0.05 Maximum Curie Charge (per shipment) (excluding C-14)

$220,000/shipment 1 The Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Title 30, Part 1, Chapter 336, Subchapter N, Rule §336.1310 is available at:

https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=30&pt=

1&ch=336&rl=1310

A-5

2. Surcharges to the Base Disposal Charge:

2A. Weight Surcharge - Weight (lbs.) of Container Surcharge ($/container)

Greater than 50,000 lbs

$20,000 2B. Dose Rate Surcharge - Surface Dose Rate (R/hour) of Container Surcharge per cubic foot

($/ft3)

Greater than 500 R/hour

$400 2C. Irradiated Hardware Surcharge Surcharge for special handling per shipment

$75,000/shipment Amended to be Effective August 6, 2020

A-6 Exhibit A-2 Pursuant to 48-46-40(A)(2), S.C.C.

Uniform Schedule of Maximum Disposal Rates for Atlantic Compact Regional Waste EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2024 The Uniform Schedule of Maximum Disposal Rates for Atlantic Compact Regional Waste is a permanent ceiling on disposal rates applicable to Atlantic Compact waste that is adjusted each year in accordance with the Producer Price Index. South Carolina may charge Atlantic Compact generators less than the Uniform Maximum Schedule, but cannot charge regional generators more than this rate.

THE MINIMUM CHARGE PER SHIPMENT, EXCLUDING SURCHARGES AND SPECIFIC OTHER CHARGES, IS $1,000.00

1.

WEIGHT CHARGES (not including surcharges)

A.

Base weight charge Density Range Weight Rate i) Equal to or greater than 120 lbs./ft3

$9.917 per pound ii) Equal to or greater than 75 lbs./ft3 and less than 120 lbs./ft3

$10.910 per pound iii) Equal to or greater than 60 lbs./ft3 and less than 75 lbs./ft3

$13.387 per pound iv) Equal to or greater than 45 lbs./ft3 and less than 60 lbs./ft3

$17.356 per pound v) Less than 45 lbs./ft3

$17.356 per pound multiplied by: (45 ÷ pounds per cubic foot of the package)

B.

Dose multiplier on base weight charge Container Dose Level Multiplier on Weight Rate, above 0 mR/hr - 200 mR/hr 1.00

>200 mR/hr - 1 R/hr 1.08

>1R/hr - 2R/hr 1.12

>2R/hr - 3R/hr 1.17

>3R/hr - 4R/hr 1.22

>4R/hr - 5R/hr 1.27

>5R/hr - 10R/hr 1.32

>10R/hr - 25R/hr 1.37

>25R/hr - 50R/hr 1.42

>50R/hr 1.48 C.

Biological Waste: Add $2.155 per pound to rate calculated above

A-7

2.

SURCHARGES A.

Millicurie surcharge

$0.743 per millicurie*

  • In lieu of above, generator may opt for an alternative millicurie charge of $1.484 per millicurie applicable only to millicuries with greater than 5-year half-life. Such election must be provided in writing to the disposal site operator prior to July 1, 2023.

MAXIMUM MILLICURIE CHARGE IS $297,000 PER SHIPMENT (400,000 MCI).

B.

Irradiated hardware charges

$112,714 per shipment (See Note B under Miscellaneous)

C.

Special nuclear material surcharge

$22.537 per gram D.

Atlantic Compact Commission administrative surcharge

$6.00 per cubic foot (Subject to change during year)

A-8 Exhibit A-2 NOTES A.

Surcharges for the Barnwell Extended Care Fund and the Decommissioning Trust Fund are included in the rates.

B.

Irradiated hardware: As a general rule, billing as irradiated hardware pertains to shipments of exceptionally high activity that require clearing of the site and special off-loading into a slit trench.

These generally include TN-RAM2 and other horizontally offloaded cask shipments. In addition to items of irradiated hardware, shipments considered irradiated hardware, for purposes of disposal, have included certain sealed sources and materials with exceptionally high levels of radioactivity.

C.

Large components (e.g., steam generators, reactor pressure vessels, coolant pumps).

Disposal fees for large components (e.g., steam generators, reactor pressure vessels, reactor coolant pumps, or items that will not fit into standard sized disposal vaults) are based on the generally applicable rates, in their entirety, except that the weight and volume used to determine density and weight related charges is calculated as follows:

1.

For packages where the large component shell qualifies as the disposal vault per Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) regulations, weight and volume calculations are based on all sub-components and material contained within the inside surface of the large component shell, including all internals and any stabilization media injected by the shipper, but excluding the shell itself and all incidental external attachments required for shipping and handling; and

2.

For packages with a separate shipping container that qualifies as the disposal vault per DHEC regulations, weight and volume calculations are based on the large component, all sub-components, and material contained within the inside surface of the shipping container, including any stabilization media injected by the shipper (including that between the large component and the shipping container), but excluding the shipping container itself and all incidental external attachments required for shipping and handling.

D.

Co-mingled shipments from brokers and processors: For containers that include waste from different generators (DHEC permittees), the weight and density of the waste from each generator will be assessed separately for purposes of the weight charge in I.A. The dose of the container as a whole will be used to assess the dose multiplier in I.B. The millicurie charge 2.A. above, applies individually to each portion of waste in the shipment from each generator. The disposal site operator will provide guidelines for application of this method.

E.

Transport vehicles with additional shielding features may be subject to an additional handling fee, which will be provided upon request.

F.

In certain circumstances, the disposal site operator may assess additional charges for necessary services that are not part of and are additional to disposal rates established by the State of South 2 TN-RAM is a radioactive material cask used to transport irradiated non-fuel bearing solid materials.

A-9 Carolina. These include decontamination services and special services as described in the Barnwell Site Disposal Criteria.

G.

The disposal site operator has established the following policies and procedures, which are provided herein for informational purposes:

i.

Terms of payment are net 30 days upon presentation of invoices. A per-month service charge of one and one-half percent (11/2 percent) shall be levied on accounts not paid within thirty (30) days.

ii.

Company purchase orders or a written letter of authorization and substance acceptable to Chem-Nuclear Systems, L.L.C. (CNS) shall be received before receipt of radioactive waste material at the Barnwell Site and shall refer to CNS Radioactive Material License, the Barnwell Site Disposal Criteria, and subsequent changes thereto.

iii.

All shipments shall receive a CNS shipment identification number and conform to the Prior Notification Plan.

A-10 Exhibit A-3 U.S. ECOLOGY WASHINGTON, INC.

RICHLAND, WASHINGTON FACILITY RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL SCHEDULE OF CHARGES EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2024 SCHEDULE A, FORTIETH REVISION Note: Rates in this Schedule A are subject to adjustment in accordance with the rate adjustment mechanism adopted in the Commissions Sixth Supplemental Order in Docket No.

UR-950619 as extended by Commission Order in Docket Nos. UR-010623 and UR-010706, and TL-070848.

A.

SITE AVAILABILITY CHARGE

1.

Rates Block Block Criteria Annual Charge per Generator in $

0 No site use at all

$440 1

Greater than zero but less than or equal to 10 ft3 and 50 mR/h 841 2

Greater than 10 ft3 or 50 mR/h* but less than or equal to 20 ft3 and 100 mR/h*

1,615 3

Greater than 20 ft3 or 100 mR/h* but less than or equal to 40 ft3 and 200 mR/h*

3,099 4

Greater than 40 ft3 or 200 mR/h* but less than or equal to 80 ft3 and 400 mR/h*

5,951 5

Greater than 80 ft3or 400 mR/h* but less than or equal to 160 ft3 and 800 mR/h*

11,429 6

Greater than 160 ft3 or 800 mR/h* but less than or equal to 320 ft3 and 1,600 mR/h*

21,917 7

Greater than 320 ft3 or 1,600 mR/h* but less than or equal to 640 ft3 and 3,200 mR/h*

42,087 8

Greater than 640 ft3 or 3,200 mR/h* but less than or equal to 1,280 ft3 and 6,400 mR/h*

80,795 9

Greater than 1,280 ft3 or 6,400 mR/h* but less than or equal to 2,560 ft3 and 12,800 mR/h*

155,125 10 Greater than 2,560 ft3 or 12,800 mR/h* but less than or equal to 5,120 ft3 and 25,600 mR/h*

176,701 11 Greater than 5,120 ft3 or 25,600 mR/h*

176,701

  • For purposes of determining the site availability charge, mR/hour is calculated by summing the mR per hour at container surface of all containers received during the year.
2.

Exemptions

a.

As to waste which is generated for research, medical or educational purposes, educational research institutions shall be placed in a rate block for the site availability charge which is one (1) lower than what would otherwise apply through application of the block criteria shown above. Educational research Institution means a state or independent, not-for-profit, post-secondary educational institution.

b.

As to waste which arises as residual or secondary waste from brokers provision of compaction or processing services for others, if application of the block criteria shown above would place a broker in a rate block for the site availability charge which is greater than Block No. 7, such broker shall be placed in the rate block which is the greater of (i)

Block No. 7, or (ii) the block which is two (2) lower than what would otherwise apply

A-11 through application of the block criteria shown above. Brokers are those customers holding the broker classification of site use permits issued by the Department of Health.

3.

Payment Arrangements

a. Initial Determination Initial determination as to the applicable rate block for each customer shall be based on projections provided by customers prior to the beginning of each calendar year. For those customers who do not intend to ship waste to the facility during the calendar year (those assigned to block No. 0) and for those customers who are initially determined to fall into block Nos. 1-2, the entire site availability charge for the year will be due and payable as of January 1. For those customers who are initially determined to fall into block Nos. 3-8, the entire site availability charge will also be due and payable as of January 1, although those customers may make special arrangements with the Company to pay the charge in equal installments at the beginning of each calendar quarter. For those generators who are initially determined to fall in block nos. 9-11, 1/12 of the site availability charge will be due and payable as of the beginning of each calendar month. These customers may pay in advance if they wish.
b. Reconciliation The site availability charge is assessed on the basis of actual volume and dose rate of waste delivered during the calendar year. Assessment of additional amounts, or refunds of overpaid amounts, will be made as appropriate to reconcile the initial determination regarding applicable rate block with the actual volume and dose rates during the calendar year.

A-12 Exhibit A-3 SCHEDULE A (Continued)

B.

DISPOSAL RATES

1.

Volume: $287.30 per cubic foot

2.

Shipment: $28,680 per manifested shipment

3.

Container: $20,430 per container on each manifest.

4.

Dose Rate:

Block No.

Dose Rate at Container Surface Charge per Container in $

1 Less than or equal to 200 mR/h

$119 2

Greater than 200 mR/h but less than or equal to 1,000 mR/h 8,460 3

Greater than 1,000 mR/h but less than or equal to 10,000 mR/h 33,810 4

Greater than 10,000 mR/h but less than or equal to 100,000 mR/h 50,920 5

Greater than 100,000 mR/h 855,000 EXTRAORDINARY VOLUMES Waste shipments qualifying as an extraordinary volume under RCW 81.108.020(3) are charged a rate equal to 51.5% of the volume disposal rate.

NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING WASTE The volume disposal rate applicable to waste from the decommissioning of nuclear generating units shall be 80 percent of those set forth above; provided, however, that such waste must satisfy the quantity requirements for extraordinary volume under RCW 81.108.020(3).3 SCHEDULE B Surcharges and Other Special Charges Fourteenth Revision ENGINEERED CONCRETE BARRIERS 72" x 8' barrier

$23,945.00 each 84" x 8' barrier

$28,618.00 each 3 Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 81.108.020(3) - "Extraordinary volume" means volumes of low-level radioactive waste delivered to a site caused by nonrecurring events, outside normal operations of a generator, that are in excess of twenty thousand cubic feet or twenty percent of the preceding year's total volume at such site, whichever is less.

http://leg.wa.gov/ or (http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=81.108.020)

A-13 SURCHARGE FOR HEAVY OBJECTS The Company shall collect its actual labor and equipment costs incurred, plus a margin thereon of 25 percent, in handling and disposing of objects or packages weighing more than seventeen thousand five hundred (17,500) pounds.

SCHEDULE C Tax and Fee Rider First Revision The rates and charges set forth in Schedules A and B shall be increased by the amount of any fee, surcharge, or tax assessed on a volume or gross revenue basis against or collected by U.S. Ecology Washington, Inc. as listed below:

Perpetual Care and Maintenance Fees

$1.75 per cubic foot Business & Occupation Tax 3.3 percent of rates and charges Site Surveillance Fee

$26.00 per cubic foot Surcharge (RCW 43.200.233)

$6.50 per cubic foot Commission Regulatory Fee 1.0 percent of rates and charges

B-1 APPENDIX B CALCULATION OF LOW-LEVEL WASTE BURIAL/DISPOSITION COST ESCALATION FACTORS The calculations necessary to determine the costs for burial/disposition of radioactive wastes resulting from decommissioning the reference PWR and the reference BWR are performed using spreadsheet models. The spreadsheets evaluate the burial/disposition costs for each of the items originally budgeted in the PWR and BWR decommissioning studies and in Addendums 4 and 3 (References 1 and 2), respectively, to those reports. The costs are based on the published price schedules from the compact-affiliated disposal facilities and a price quote from the non-compact disposal facility located in Utah.

The Bx values reported in this document reflect the updated rate schedules and price quote. All the calculations are based on the same inventory of radioactive wastes as was postulated in the 1986 and 1978-1980 analyses. Starting in 1988, the inventories also included post-Three Mile Island (TMI)-2 contributions from the reference PWR and the reference BWR (References 1 and 2).

B.1 Generators Located in States Not Affiliated with a Compact having a Disposal Facility Both the Utah and Texas disposal facilities are available for the disposal of all LLW regardless of whether a generator has a compact-affiliated disposal facility available for disposal of their LLW or not. The Utah facility can only dispose of Class A LLW, while the Texas facility is a full-service disposal facility and so can dispose of Class A, B, and C LLW (subject to the constraints described in Section A.3). For the year 2024, Bx = 12.405 and 11.658 for a PWR and BWR, respectively, for disposal of most Class A LLW at the Utah non-compact site and for the remainder of LLW at the Texas LLW disposal site. The Bx values include the additional fees imposed for the disposal of non-compact LLW at the Texas disposal facility. The Bx values are summarized in Table 2-1. These Bx values should be used by generators located in States not affiliated with a compact having a disposal facility.

Waste burial costs for the year 2024 were developed using both the rate schedules for the Texas disposal facility provided in Exhibit A-1, and the associated additional fees for out-of-compact waste, and the price quote for the non-compact disposal facility provided in Table A-1.

The spreadsheet calculations for the current year, which are too voluminous to present here, are summarized in Table B-1 and Table B-2 for PWR and BWR plants, respectively. For comparison purposes, Table B-3 and Table B-4 provide summaries of the waste burial/disposition costs for 2022 for PWR and BWR plants, respectively.

B.2 Texas LLW Disposal Site For the year 2024, Bx = 6.650 and 6.009 for a PWR and BWR, respectively, at the Texas disposal facility. These Bx values reflect the adjustment in waste burial costs at the Texas LLW disposal site normalized to the 1986 Washington LLW disposal site burial costs.

Waste burial costs for the year 2024 were developed using the rate schedules provided in Exhibit A-1. The spreadsheet calculations for the current year, which are too voluminous to present here, are summarized in Table B-5 and Table B-6 for PWR and BWR plants,

B-2 respectively. For comparison purposes, Table B-7 and Table B-8 provide summaries of the waste burial costs at the Texas LLW disposal site for 2022 for PWR and BWR plants, respectively.

B.3 South Carolina LLW Disposal Site For the year 2024, Bx = 39.197 and 34.514 for a PWR and BWR, respectively, at the South Carolina disposal facility. These Bx values reflect the adjustment in waste burial costs at the South Carolina LLW disposal site normalized to the 1986 Washington LLW disposal site burial costs. Bx values for several previous revisions of NUREG-1307 are summarized in Table 2-1.

Waste burial costs for the year 2024 were developed using the rate schedules provided in Exhibit A-2. The spreadsheet calculations for the current year, which are too voluminous to present here, are summarized in Table B-9 and Table B-10 for PWR and BWR plants, respectively. For comparison purposes, Table B-11 and Table B-12 provide summaries of the waste burial costs at the South Carolina LLW disposal site for 2022 for PWR and BWR plants, respectively.

B.4 Washington LLW Disposal Site The LLW disposal site located in Washington was used to develop the original decommissioning cost estimates for the reference PWR and BWR. These estimates are the basis for the minimum decommissioning fund requirement specified in 10 CFR 50.75(c), which is in 1986 dollars. Thus, Bx = 1.0/1.0 (for PWR/BWR) for 1986.

For the year 2024, Bx = 13.260 and 11.274 for a PWR and BWR, respectively, at the Washington disposal facility. These Bx values reflect the adjustment in waste burial costs at the Washington LLW disposal site since 1986. Bx values for several previous revisions of NUREG-1307 are summarized in Table 2-1.

Waste burial costs for the year 2024 were developed using the rate schedule provided in Exhibit A-1. The spreadsheet calculations for the current year, which are too voluminous to present here, are summarized in Table B-13 and Table B-14 for PWR and BWR plants, respectively. For comparison purposes, Table B-15 and B-16 provide summaries of the waste burial costs at the Washington LLW disposal site for 2022 for PWR and BWR plants, respectively.

B.5 Combination of Non-Compact and Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facilities For the year 2024, Bx = 9.471 and 8.596 for a PWR and BWR, respectively, for disposal of most Class A LLW at the Utah non-compact disposal site, and for the remainder of LLW at the Washington LLW disposal site. Bx = 12.813 and 15.017 for a PWR and BWR, respectively, for disposal of most Class A LLW at the Utah non-compact disposal site, and for the remainder of LLW at the South Carolina disposal site. Bx = 10.923 and 9.862 for a PWR and BWR, respectively, for disposal of most Class A LLW at the Utah non-compact site, and for the remainder of LLW at the Texas LLW disposal site. Bx values are summarized in Table 2-1.

Waste burial costs for the year 2024 were developed using both the rate schedules for the compact-affiliated disposal facilities provided in Exhibits A-1, A-2, and A-3 and for the price quote for the non-compact disposal facility provided in Table A-2. The spreadsheet calculations for the current year, which are too voluminous to present here, are summarized in Table B-17 through Table B-22 for the Texas, South Carolina, and Washington LLW disposal sites for PWR

B-3 and BWR plants, respectively. For comparison purposes, Table B-23 through Table B-28 provide summaries of the Texas, South Carolina, and Washington waste burial/disposition costs for 2022 for PWR and BWR plants, respectively.

B.6 Other As other low-level radioactive waste burial sites come into service in the interstate compacts, values for Bx will be calculated using the price schedules for each of those sites and will be incorporated into subsequent issues of this NUREG. Those materials whose activity concentrations exceed the limits for Class C LLW are identified by footnote as greater-than-Class C (GTCC) material. Because the analyses in this NUREG postulate placing this material in a LLW disposal facility, the disposal costs for this material may be significantly overestimated compared with high-density packaging and geologic repository disposal. It may also be feasible to store GTCC waste in independent spent fuel storage installations (ISFSIs) or other interim storage facilities, as permitted by 10 CFR Part 72, Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste.

B-4 Table B-1 PWR Disposition Costs for Generators Located in States Not Affiliated with a Compact having a Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

0 827,640 827,640 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,839,200 1,839,200 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 0

0 0

0 0

0 87,120 87,120 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 0

0 0

0 0

0 87,120 87,120 UPPER CORE BARREL 200,000 150,000 0

0 50,000 0

0 400,000 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 500,000 375,000 0

0 1,100,000 0

0 1,975,000 GUIDE TUBES 0

0 0

0 0

0 130,680 130,680 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 3,200,000 2,400,000 0

0 7,040,000 0

0 12,640,000 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 600,000 450,000 0

0 1,320,000 0

0 2,370,000 CORE SHROUD(a) 400,000 300,000 0

0 13,420,000 0

0 14,120,000 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 500,000 375,000 0

0 2,200,000 0

0 3,075,000 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 100,000 75,000 0

0 220,000 0

0 395,000 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,100,000 825,000 0

0 125,000 0

0 2,050,000 MISC INTERNALS 800,000 600,000 0

0 100,000 0

0 1,500,000 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

0 5,436,288 5,436,288 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 0

0 0

0 0

0 111,514 111,514 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,931,160 1,931,160 PRESSURIZER 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,655,280 1,655,280 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 0

0 0

0 0

0 87,120 87,120 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 0

0 0

0 0

0 261,360 261,360 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 0

0 0

0 0

0 871,200 871,200 STEAM GENERATORS 0

0 0

0 0

0 9,822,248 9,822,248 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 0

0 0

0 0

0 718,740 718,740 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 0

0 0

0 0

0 11,458,022 11,458,022 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 0

0 0

0 0

0 103,914,776 103,914,776 FILTER CARTRIDGES 315,000 0

0 0

250,000 0

0 565,000 SPENT RESINS 2,000,000 0

0 0 2,100,000 0

0 4,100,000 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 5,263,335 5,263,335 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 3,150,000 0

0 0

26,250 0

0 3,176,250 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,243,253 2,243,253 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,388,115 3,388,115 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 12,865,000 5,550,000 0

0 27,951,250 0 150,134,170 196,500,420 OUT-OF-COMPACT TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 26,660,594 TOTAL PWR COSTS 223,161,013 a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-5 Table B-2 BWR Disposition Costs for Generators Located in States Not Affiliated with a Compact having a Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 353,146 1,050,000 0

0 480,018 0

0 1,883,164 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 176,573 525,000 0

0 35,001 0

0 736,574 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 529,719 600,000 0

0 1,760,350 211,888 0

3,101,956 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 0

0 0

0 0

0 30,766 30,766 JET PUMPS 494,404 1,500,000 0

0 1,000,037 197,762 0

3,192,203 TOP FUEL GUIDES 847,550 5,400,000 0

0 1,505,056 339,020 0

8,091,626 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 0

0 0

0 0

0 84,607 84,607 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,659,786 10,500,000 0

0 30,811,655 663,914 0 43,635,356 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

0 61,532 61,532 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

0 692,237 692,237 REACT. WATER REC 0

0 0

0 0

0 676,854 676,854 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,384,371 2,384,371 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 0

0 0

0 0

0 27,197,214 27,197,214 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 0

0 0

0 0

0 369,193 369,193 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

0 130,756 130,756 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

0 76,915 76,915 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

0 246,129 246,129 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

0 99,990 99,990 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 0

0 0

0 0

0 476,874 476,874 POOL LINER & RACKS 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,930,469 2,930,469 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,338,120 3,338,120 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 0

0 0

0 0

0 10,914,267 10,914,267 TURBINE 0

0 0

0 0

0 22,830,140 22,830,140 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,792,022 2,792,022 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 5,668,650 5,668,650 MAIN STEAM 0

0 0

0 0

0 546,098 546,098 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 5,499,437 5,499,437 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,150,105 3,150,105 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 930,674 930,674 OTHER TG BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

0 37,357,712 37,357,712 RAD WASTE BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

0 18,498,105 18,498,105 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,590,991 5,512,221 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 3,285,317 0

0 0

27,688 0

0 3,313,005 TG BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,074,121 3,721,449 TG BLDG - CLASS B 2,217,404 0

0 0

18,688 0

0 2,236,091 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 927,136 3,212,198 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 1,913,345 0

0 0

16,125 0

0 1,929,470 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 554,256 554,256 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 5,226,561 0

0 0 1,560,000 0

0 6,786,561 OTHER 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,338,324 1,338,324 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

0 276,895 276,895 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 16,703,806 19,575,000 0

0 37,214,616 1,412,584 152,744,958 236,504,584 OUT-OF-COMPACT TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 43,145,230 TOTAL BWR COSTS 279,575,538 a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-6 Table B-3 PWR Disposition Costs for Generators Located in States Not Affiliated with a Compact having a Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

0 957,220 957,220 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,129,600 2,129,600 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 0

0 0

0 0

0 100,760 100,760 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 0

0 0

0 0

0 100,760 100,760 UPPER CORE BARREL 200,000 150,000 0

0 50,000 0

0 400,000 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 500,000 375,000 0

0 1,100,000 0

0 1,975,000 GUIDE TUBES 0

0 0

0 0

0 151,140 151,140 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 3,200,000 2,400,000 0

0 7,040,000 0

0 12,640,000 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 600,000 450,000 0

0 1,320,000 0

0 2,370,000 CORE SHROUD(a) 400,000 300,000 0

0 13,420,000 0

0 14,120,000 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 500,000 375,000 0

0 2,200,000 0

0 3,075,000 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 100,000 75,000 0

0 220,000 0

0 395,000 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,100,000 825,000 0

0 125,000 0

0 2,050,000 MISC INTERNALS 800,000 600,000 0

0 100,000 0

0 1,500,000 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

0 6,287,424 6,287,424 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 0

0 0

0 0

0 128,973 128,973 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,236,080 2,236,080 PRESSURIZER 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,916,640 1,916,640 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 0

0 0

0 0

0 100,760 100,760 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 0

0 0

0 0

0 302,280 302,280 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,007,600 1,007,600 STEAM GENERATORS 0

0 0

0 0

0 11,373,129 11,373,129 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 0

0 0

0 0

0 831,270 831,270 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 0

0 0

0 0

0 13,251,955 13,251,955 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 0

0 0

0 0

0 120,184,261 120,184,261 FILTER CARTRIDGES 315,000 0

0 0

250,000 0

0 565,000 SPENT RESINS 2,000,000 0

0 0 2,100,000 0

0 4,100,000 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 6,091,965 6,091,965 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 3,150,000 0

0 0

26,250 0

0 3,176,250 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,552,667 2,552,667 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,918,577 3,918,577 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 12,865,000 5,550,000 0

0 27,951,250 0 173,623,060 219,989,310 OUT-OF-COMPACT TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 26,660,594 TOTAL PWR COSTS 246,649,904 a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-7 Table B-4 BWR Disposition Costs for Generators Located in States Not Affiliated with a Compact having a Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 353,146 1,050,000 0

0 480,150 0

0 1,883,296 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 176,573 525,000 0

0 35,009 0

0 736,582 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 529,719 600,000 0

0 1,762,100 211,888 0

3,103,707 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 0

0 0

0 0

0 35,583 35,583 JET PUMPS 494,404 1,500,000 0

0 1,000,644 197,762 0

3,192,810 TOP FUEL GUIDES 847,550 5,400,000 0

0 1,509,440 339,020 0

8,096,011 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 0

0 0

0 0

0 97,853 97,853 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,659,786 10,500,000 0

0 30,933,950 663,914 0 43,757,651 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

0 71,166 71,166 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

0 800,617 800,617 REACT. WATER REC 0

0 0

0 0

0 782,826 782,826 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,757,682 2,757,682 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 0

0 0

0 0

0 31,455,364 31,455,364 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 0

0 0

0 0

0 426,996 426,996 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

0 151,228 151,228 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

0 88,957 88,957 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

0 284,664 284,664 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

0 115,645 115,645 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 0

0 0

0 0

0 551,536 551,536 POOL LINER & RACKS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,389,280 3,389,280 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,860,755 3,860,755 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 0

0 0

0 0

0 12,623,066 12,623,066 TURBINE 0

0 0

0 0

0 26,434,899 26,434,899 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,229,156 3,229,156 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 6,556,166 6,556,166 MAIN STEAM 0

0 0

0 0

0 631,598 631,598 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 6,360,460 6,360,460 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,647,490 3,647,490 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,076,385 1,076,385 OTHER TG BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

0 43,206,647 43,206,647 RAD WASTE BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

0 21,394,273 21,394,273 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,840,085 1,840,085 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 3,285,317 0

0 0

27,688 0

0 3,313,005 TG BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,242,291 1,242,291 TG BLDG - CLASS B 2,217,404 0

0 0

18,688 0

0 2,236,091 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,072,293 1,072,293 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 1,913,345 0

0 0

16,125 0

0 1,929,470 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 630,705 630,705 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 5,226,561 0

0 0 1,560,000 0

0 6,786,561 OTHER 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,547,860 1,547,860 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

0 320,247 320,247 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 16,703,806 19,575,000 0

0 37,343,793 1,412,584 176,683,774 251,718,957 OUT-OF-COMPACT TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 43,145,230 TOTAL BWR COSTS 294,864,187 a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-8 Table B-5 PWR Burial Costs at the Texas Site (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 380,000 2,850,000 0

0 958,500 0

4,188,500 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 400,000 3,000,000 0

0 1,000 0

3,401,000 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 40,000 300,000 0

0 500 0

340,500 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 40,000 300,000 0

0 5,000 0

345,000 UPPER CORE BARREL 200,000 150,000 0

0 50,000 0

400,000 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 500,000 375,000 0

0 1,100,000 0

1,975,000 GUIDE TUBES 60,000 450,000 0

0 5,000 0

515,000 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 3,200,000 2,400,000 0

0 7,040,000 0 12,640,000 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 600,000 450,000 0

0 1,320,000 0

2,370,000 CORE SHROUD(a) 400,000 300,000 0

0 13,420,000 0 14,120,000 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 500,000 375,000 0

0 2,200,000 0

3,075,000 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 100,000 75,000 0

0 220,000 0

395,000 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,100,000 825,000 0

0 125,000 0

2,050,000 MISC INTERNALS 800,000 600,000 0

0 100,000 0

1,500,000 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 2,496,000 0

0 0

100,000 0

2,596,000 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 51,200 0

0 0

500 0

51,700 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 420,000 0

0 240,000 3,883 0

663,883 PRESSURIZER 360,000 0

0 0

254 0

360,254 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 40,000 0

0 0

590 0

40,590 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 120,000 0

0 0

202 0

120,202 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 400,000 0

0 0

4,072 0

404,072 STEAM GENERATORS 2,136,200 0

0 640,000 220,000 0

2,996,200 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 330,000 0

0 0

14,900 0

344,900 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 5,260,800 0

0 0

11,190 0

5,271,990 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 47,711,100 0

0 0

9,213 0 47,720,313 FILTER CARTRIDGES 315,000 0

0 0

250,000 0

565,000 SPENT RESINS 2,000,000 0

0 0 2,100,000 0

4,100,000 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 697,500 0

0 0

11,625 0

709,125 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 3,150,000 0

0 0

26,250 0

3,176,250 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 940,000 0

0 0

690,250 0

1,630,250 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 1,555,608 0

0 0

0 0

1,555,608 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 76,303,408 12,450,000 0

880,000 29,987,927 0 119,621,335 OUT-OF-COMPACT TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 0 TOTAL PWR COSTS 119,621,335 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-9 Table B-6 BWR Burial Costs at the Texas Site (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 353,146 1,050,000 0

0 480,018 0

1,883,164 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 176,573 525,000 0

0 35,001 0

736,574 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 529,719 600,000 0

0 1,760,350 211,888 3,101,956 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 14,126 450,000 0

0 5,000 0

469,126 JET PUMPS 494,404 1,500,000 0

0 1,000,037 197,762 3,192,203 TOP FUEL GUIDES 847,550 5,400,000 0

0 1,505,056 339,020 8,091,626 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 38,846 1,200,000 0

0 32,501 0

1,271,347 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,659,786 10,500,000 0

0 30,811,655 663,914 43,635,356 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 28,252 1,500,000 0

0 108,002 0

1,636,254 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 317,831 0

0 0

8,500 0

326,332 REACT. WATER REC 310,768 0

0 0

2,198 0

312,966 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 1,094,753 0

0 0

7,741 0

1,102,494 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 12,487,243 0

0 0

88,302 0

12,575,545 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 169,510 0

0 0

1,199 0

170,709 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 60,035 0

0 0

425 0

60,459 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 35,315 0

0 0

250 0

35,564 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 113,007 0

0 0

799 0

113,806 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 45,909 0

0 0

325 0

46,234 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 218,951 0

0 0

1,548 0

220,499 POOL LINER & RACKS 1,345,486 0

0 0

9,514 0

1,355,001 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 1,532,654 0

0 0

10,838 0

1,543,492 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 5,011,142 0

0 0

35,436 0

5,046,578 TURBINE 4,965,233 0

0 0

35,111 0

5,000,344 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 1,281,920 0

0 0

9,065 0

1,290,985 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 2,602,686 0

0 0

18,405 0

2,621,091 MAIN STEAM 250,734 0

0 0

1,773 0

252,507 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 2,524,994 0

0 0

17,855 0

2,542,849 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 685,103 0

0 0

4,845 0

689,948 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 427,307 0

0 0

3,022 0

430,328 OTHER TG BLDG 17,152,301 0

0 0

121,291 0

17,273,592 RAD WASTE BLDG 8,493,161 0

0 0

60,059 0

8,553,220 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 730,483 0

0 0

12,313 0

742,795 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 3,285,317 0

0 0

27,688 0

3,313,005 TG BLDG - CLASS A 493,168 0

0 0

8,313 0

501,481 TG BLDG - CLASS B 2,217,404 0

0 0

18,688 0

2,236,091 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 425,682 0

0 0

7,175 0

432,857 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 1,913,345 0

0 0

16,125 0

1,929,470 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 1,737,478 0

0 0

72,600 0

1,810,078 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 5,226,561 0

0 0 1,560,000 0

6,786,561 OTHER 614,474 0

0 0

16,450 0

630,924 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 127,133 0

0 0

0 0

127,133 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 82,039,489 22,725,000 0

0 37,915,470 1,412,584 144,092,543 OUT-OF-COMPACT TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 0 TOTAL BWR COSTS 144,092,543 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-10 Table B-7 PWR Burial Costs at the Texas Site (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 380,000 2,850,000 0

0 958,500 0

4,188,500 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 400,000 3,000,000 0

0 1,000 0

3,401,000 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 40,000 300,000 0

0 500 0

340,500 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 40,000 300,000 0

0 5,000 0

345,000 UPPER CORE BARREL 200,000 150,000 0

0 50,000 0

400,000 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 500,000 375,000 0

0 1,100,000 0

1,975,000 GUIDE TUBES 60,000 450,000 0

0 5,000 0

515,000 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 3,200,000 2,400,000 0

0 7,040,000 0 12,640,000 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 600,000 450,000 0

0 1,320,000 0

2,370,000 CORE SHROUD(a) 400,000 300,000 0

0 13,420,000 0 14,120,000 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 500,000 375,000 0

0 2,200,000 0

3,075,000 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 100,000 75,000 0

0 220,000 0

395,000 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,100,000 825,000 0

0 125,000 0

2,050,000 MISC INTERNALS 800,000 600,000 0

0 100,000 0

1,500,000 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 2,496,000 0

0 0

100,000 0

2,596,000 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 51,200 0

0 0

500 0

51,700 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 420,000 0

0 240,000 3,883 0

663,883 PRESSURIZER 360,000 0

0 0

254 0

360,254 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 40,000 0

0 0

590 0

40,590 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 120,000 0

0 0

202 0

120,202 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 400,000 0

0 0

4,072 0

404,072 STEAM GENERATORS 2,136,200 0

0 640,000 220,000 0

2,996,200 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 330,000 0

0 0

14,900 0

344,900 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 5,260,800 0

0 0

11,190 0

5,271,990 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 47,711,100 0

0 0

9,213 0 47,720,313 FILTER CARTRIDGES 315,000 0

0 0

250,000 0

565,000 SPENT RESINS 2,000,000 0

0 0 2,100,000 0

4,100,000 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 697,500 0

0 0

11,625 0

709,125 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 3,150,000 0

0 0

26,250 0

3,176,250 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 940,000 0

0 0

690,250 0

1,630,250 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 1,555,608 0

0 0

0 0

1,555,608 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 76,303,408 12,450,000 0

880,000 29,987,927 0 119,621,335 OUT-OF-COMPACT TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 0 TOTAL PWR COSTS 119,621,335 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-11 Table B-8 BWR Burial Costs at the Texas Site (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 353,146 1,050,000 0

0 480,150 0

1,883,296 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 176,573 525,000 0

0 35,009 0

736,582 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 529,719 600,000 0

0 1,762,100 211,888 3,103,707 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 14,126 450,000 0

0 5,001 0

469,127 JET PUMPS 494,404 1,500,000 0

0 1,000,644 197,762 3,192,810 TOP FUEL GUIDES 847,550 5,400,000 0

0 1,509,440 339,020 8,096,011 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 38,846 1,200,000 0

0 32,506 0

1,271,352 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,659,786 10,500,000 0

0 30,933,950 663,914 43,757,651 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 28,252 1,500,000 0

0 108,001 0

1,636,252 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 317,831 0

0 0

8,500 0

326,332 REACT. WATER REC 310,768 0

0 0

2,198 0

312,966 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 1,094,753 0

0 0

7,741 0

1,102,494 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 12,487,243 0

0 0

88,302 0

12,575,545 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 169,510 0

0 0

1,199 0

170,709 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 60,035 0

0 0

425 0

60,459 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 35,315 0

0 0

250 0

35,564 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 113,007 0

0 0

799 0

113,806 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 45,909 0

0 0

325 0

46,234 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 218,951 0

0 0

1,548 0

220,499 POOL LINER & RACKS 1,345,486 0

0 0

9,514 0

1,355,001 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 1,532,654 0

0 0

10,838 0

1,543,492 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 5,011,142 0

0 0

35,436 0

5,046,578 TURBINE 4,965,233 0

0 0

35,111 0

5,000,344 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 1,281,920 0

0 0

9,065 0

1,290,985 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 2,602,686 0

0 0

18,405 0

2,621,091 MAIN STEAM 250,734 0

0 0

1,773 0

252,507 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 2,524,994 0

0 0

17,855 0

2,542,849 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 685,103 0

0 0

4,845 0

689,948 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 427,307 0

0 0

3,022 0

430,328 OTHER TG BLDG 17,152,301 0

0 0

121,291 0

17,273,592 RAD WASTE BLDG 8,493,161 0

0 0

60,059 0

8,553,220 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 730,483 0

0 0

12,313 0

742,795 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 3,285,317 0

0 0

27,688 0

3,313,005 TG BLDG - CLASS A 493,168 0

0 0

8,313 0

501,481 TG BLDG - CLASS B 2,217,404 0

0 0

18,688 0

2,236,091 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 425,682 0

0 0

7,175 0

432,857 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 1,913,345 0

0 0

16,125 0

1,929,470 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 1,737,478 0

0 0

72,600 0

1,810,078 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 5,226,561 0

0 0 1,560,000 0

6,786,561 OTHER 614,474 0

0 0

16,450 0

630,924 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 127,133 0

0 0

0 0

127,133 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 82,039,489 22,725,000 0

0 38,044,651 1,412,584 144,221,724 OUT-OF-COMPACT TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 0 TOTAL BWR COSTS 144,221,724 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-12 Table B-9 PWR Burial Costs at the South Carolina Site (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE CASK HANDLING CURIE SURCHARGE LINER DOSE RATE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 5,898,632 4,283,132 11,286,000 0

2,831,343 24,299,107 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 3,757,731 4,508,560 14,860 0

0 8,281,151 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 354,756 450,856 7,430 0

113,522 926,563 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 327,982 450,856 74,300 0

104,954 958,092 UPPER CORE BARREL 156,204 225,428 594,000 0

74,978 1,050,610 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 390,510 563,570 1,485,000 0

187,445 2,626,525 GUIDE TUBES 577,955 676,284 74,300 0

156,048 1,484,587 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 2,499,264 3,606,848 9,504,000 0

1,199,647 16,809,759 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 468,612 676,284 1,782,000 0

224,934 3,151,830 CORE SHROUD(a) 362,788 450,856 18,117,000 0

174,138 19,104,782 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 390,510 563,570 2,970,000 0

187,445 4,111,525 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 99,064 112,714 297,000 0

47,551 556,328 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,076,315 1,239,854 1,857,500 0

516,631 4,690,300 MISC INTERNALS 872,800 901,712 1,486,000 0

418,944 3,679,456 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 21,274,500 0

1,486,000 0

0 22,760,500 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 428,384 0

7,430 0

0 435,814 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 7,457,584 0

57,701 0

0 7,515,285 PRESSURIZER 3,384,420 0

3,767 0

0 3,388,187 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 312,408 0

8,760 0

0 321,168 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 937,224 0

3,002 0

0 940,226 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 3,338,460 0

60,510 0

0 3,398,970 STEAM GENERATORS 27,291,584 0

3,269,200 0

0 30,560,784 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 2,971,914 0

221,414 0

0 3,193,328 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 52,537,282 0

166,276 0

0 52,703,557 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 404,171,067 0

136,898 0

0 404,307,965 FILTER CARTRIDGES 535,518 676,284 1,782,000 0

64,262 3,058,064 SPENT RESINS 1,963,800 2,254,280 5,940,000 0

942,624 11,100,704 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 5,447,615 0

172,748 0

0 5,620,362 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 2,945,700 6,762,840 390,075 0

235,656 10,334,271 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 9,229,860 10,595,116 10,257,115 0

1,260,760 31,342,851 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 18,512,359 0

0 0

0 18,512,359 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 579,972,799 38,999,044 73,512,285 0

8,740,880 701,225,008 ATLANTIC COMPACT COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE 3,883,494 TOTAL PWR COSTS (NSIDE COMPACT) 705,108,503 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-13 Table B-10 BWR Burial Costs at the South Carolina Site (2024 dollars)

(a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE CASK HANDLING CURIE SURCHARGE LINER DOSE RATE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 363,503 3,155,992 4,158,000 0

174,481 7,851,976 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 159,962 1,577,996 520,100 0

76,782 2,334,840 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 476,479 901,712 2,376,000 0

228,710 3,982,900 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 133,922 1,352,568 74,300 0

49,551 1,610,341 JET PUMPS 386,140 4,508,560 5,940,000 0

185,347 11,020,047 TOP FUEL GUIDES 661,954 8,115,408 21,384,000 0

317,738 30,479,100 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 444,970 3,494,134 482,950 0

164,639 4,586,693 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,296,326 15,779,960 41,580,000 0

622,237 59,278,523 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 3,447,833 2,479,708 1,604,880 0

1,275,698 8,808,120 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 5,946,802 0

126,310 0

0 6,073,112 REACT. WATER REC 2,572,968 0

32,656 0

0 2,605,624 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 15,400,468 0

115,038 0

0 15,515,506 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 108,017,664 0

1,312,175 0

0 109,329,838 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 1,323,908 0

17,812 0

0 1,341,720 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 669,620 0

6,309 0

0 675,928 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 296,904 0

3,711 0

0 300,615 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 1,040,765 0

11,875 0

0 1,052,640 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 358,558 0

4,824 0

0 363,382 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 1,978,313 0

23,008 0

0 2,001,320 POOL LINER & RACKS 13,265,931 0

141,385 0

0 13,407,317 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 14,629,734 0

161,053 0

0 14,790,787 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 39,138,019 0

526,577 0

0 39,664,596 TURBINE 49,074,097 0

521,753 0

0 49,595,849 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 10,012,051 0

134,706 0

0 10,146,757 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 21,780,803 0

273,493 0

0 22,054,296 MAIN STEAM 1,958,280 0

26,347 0

0 1,984,627 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 19,720,707 0

265,329 0

0 19,986,037 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 5,350,793 0

71,991 0

0 5,422,785 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 3,534,746 0

44,902 0

0 3,579,647 OTHER TG BLDG 133,962,903 0

1,802,384 0

0 135,765,287 RAD WASTE BLDG 66,333,288 0

892,472 0

0 67,225,760 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 5,705,214 0

182,964 0

0 5,888,178 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 14,279,321 7,213,696 411,436 0

1,142,346 23,046,799 TG BLDG - CLASS A 3,851,744 0

123,524 0

0 3,975,268 TG BLDG - CLASS B 9,370,804 4,733,988 277,696 0

749,664 15,132,153 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 3,324,663 0

106,621 0

0 3,431,284 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 8,478,347 4,283,132 239,618 0

678,268 13,679,364 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 29,161,849 19,499,522 1,078,836 0

5,137,879 54,878,086 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 8,765,411 5,861,128 15,444,000 0

1,544,334 31,614,873 OTHER 10,282,502 6,875,554 244,447 0

256,220 17,658,722 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 1,512,928 0

0 0

0 1,512,928 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 618,471,194 89,833,058 102,745,481 0

11,432,588 823,653,626 ATLANTIC COMPACT COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE 4,020,364 TOTAL BWR COSTS (INSIDE COMPACT) 827,673,990

B-14 Table B-11 PWR Burial Costs at the South Carolina Site (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE CASK HANDLING CURIE SURCHARGE LINER DOSE RATE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 5,829,635 4,232,972 11,156,800 0

2,798,225 24,017,632 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 3,713,942 4,455,760 14,680 0

0 8,184,382 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 350,622 445,576 7,340 0

112,199 915,736 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 324,160 445,576 73,400 0

103,731 946,867 UPPER CORE BARREL 154,377 222,788 587,200 0

74,101 1,038,466 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 385,943 556,970 1,468,000 0

185,252 2,596,165 GUIDE TUBES 571,195 668,364 73,400 0

154,223 1,467,182 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 2,470,032 3,564,608 9,395,200 0

1,185,615 16,615,455 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 463,131 668,364 1,761,600 0

222,303 3,115,398 CORE SHROUD(a) 358,560 445,576 17,909,600 0

172,109 18,885,845 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 385,943 556,970 2,936,000 0

185,252 4,064,165 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 97,909 111,394 293,600 0

46,997 549,900 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,063,772 1,225,334 1,835,000 0

510,611 4,634,717 MISC INTERNALS 862,560 891,152 1,468,000 0

414,029 3,635,741 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 21,024,900 0

1,468,000 0

0 22,492,900 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 423,392 0

7,340 0

0 430,732 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 7,370,352 0

57,002 0

0 7,427,354 PRESSURIZER 3,344,835 0

3,721 0

0 3,348,556 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 308,754 0

8,654 0

0 317,408 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 926,262 0

2,965 0

0 929,227 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 3,299,292 0

59,777 0

0 3,359,069 STEAM GENERATORS 26,972,352 0

3,229,600 0

0 30,201,952 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 2,937,282 0

218,732 0

0 3,156,014 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 51,925,060 0

164,262 0

0 52,089,321 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 399,461,223 0

135,240 0

0 399,596,462 FILTER CARTRIDGES 529,254 668,364 1,761,600 0

63,510 3,022,728 SPENT RESINS 1,940,760 2,227,880 5,872,000 0

931,565 10,972,205 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 5,383,898 0

170,655 0

0 5,554,553 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 2,911,140 6,683,640 385,350 0

232,891 10,213,021 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 9,121,572 10,471,036 10,132,870 0

1,245,968 30,971,446 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 18,295,818 0

0 0

0 18,295,818 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 573,207,925 38,542,324 72,657,588 0

8,638,581 693,046,418 ATLANTIC COMPACT COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE 3,883,494 TOTAL PWR COSTS (NSIDE COMPACT) 696,929,912 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-15 Table B-12 BWR Burial Costs at the South Carolina Site (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE CASK HANDLING CURIE SURCHARGE LINER DOSE RATE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 359,251 3,119,032 4,110,400 0

172,440 7,761,123 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 158,098 1,559,516 513,800 0

75,887 2,307,301 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 470,888 891,152 2,348,800 0

226,026 3,936,867 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 132,356 1,336,728 73,400 0

48,972 1,591,455 JET PUMPS 381,623 4,455,760 5,872,000 0

183,179 10,892,563 TOP FUEL GUIDES 654,211 8,020,368 21,139,200 0

314,021 30,127,801 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 439,749 3,453,214 477,100 0

162,707 4,532,771 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,281,164 15,595,160 41,104,000 0

614,959 58,595,283 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 278,855 2,450,668 1,585,440 0

103,176 4,418,140 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 5,877,242 0

124,780 0

0 6,002,022 REACT. WATER REC 2,542,985 0

32,260 0

0 2,575,245 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 15,220,327 0

113,644 0

0 15,333,972 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 106,754,263 0

1,296,280 0

0 108,050,543 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 1,308,423 0

17,597 0

0 1,326,019 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 661,764 0

6,232 0

0 667,996 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 293,444 0

3,666 0

0 297,110 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 1,028,592 0

11,731 0

0 1,040,323 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 354,365 0

4,766 0

0 359,130 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 1,955,102 0

22,729 0

0 1,977,831 POOL LINER & RACKS 13,110,770 0

139,673 0

0 13,250,442 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 14,459,253 0

159,102 0

0 14,618,355 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 38,680,251 0

520,198 0

0 39,200,450 TURBINE 48,502,232 0

515,433 0

0 49,017,664 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 9,894,948 0

133,074 0

0 10,028,022 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 21,526,989 0

270,181 0

0 21,797,170 MAIN STEAM 1,935,376 0

26,028 0

0 1,961,404 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 19,490,049 0

262,115 0

0 19,752,165 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 5,288,209 0

71,119 0

0 5,359,329 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 3,493,275 0

44,358 0

0 3,537,633 OTHER TG BLDG 132,396,040 0

1,780,552 0

0 134,176,592 RAD WASTE BLDG 65,557,438 0

881,661 0

0 66,439,099 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 5,638,485 0

180,748 0

0 5,819,232 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 14,112,295 7,129,216 406,453 0

1,128,984 22,776,947 TG BLDG - CLASS A 3,806,693 0

122,028 0

0 3,928,720 TG BLDG - CLASS B 9,261,193 4,678,548 274,333 0

740,895 14,954,969 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 3,285,777 0

105,329 0

0 3,391,106 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 8,379,175 4,232,972 236,715 0

670,334 13,519,196 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 28,820,740 19,271,162 1,065,768 0

5,077,781 54,235,451 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 8,662,881 5,792,488 15,267,200 0

1,526,270 31,248,839 OTHER 10,162,226 6,795,034 241,486 0

253,223 17,451,969 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 1,495,231 0

0 0

0 1,495,231 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 608,112,229 88,781,018 101,561,378 0

11,298,855 809,753,480 ATLANTIC COMPACT COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE 4,020,364 TOTAL BWR COSTS (INSIDE COMPACT) 813,773,844 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-16 Table B-13 PWR Burial Costs at the Washington Site (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT VOLUME CHARGE SHIPMENT CHARGE CONTAINER CHARGE CONTAINER DOSE RATE CHARGE DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 598,274 519,854 425,434 1,060,358 2,603,920 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 629,762 547,214 447,826 2,608 1,627,410 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 62,976 54,721 44,783 74,112 236,592 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 62,976 54,721 44,783 74,112 236,592 UPPER CORE BARREL 31,488 27,361 22,391 55,808 137,048 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 78,720 68,402 55,978 139,521 342,621 GUIDE TUBES 94,464 82,082 67,174 111,167 354,888 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 503,809 437,772 358,260 892,933 2,192,774 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 94,464 82,082 67,174 167,425 411,145 CORE SHROUD(a) 62,976 54,721 44,783 111,617 274,097 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 78,720 68,402 55,978 139,521 342,621 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 15,744 13,680 11,196 27,904 68,524 LOWER CORE FORGING 173,184 150,484 123,152 306,946 753,766 MISC INTERNALS 125,952 109,443 89,565 223,233 548,194 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 3,929,712 670,338 2,183,150 12,716 6,795,916 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 80,609 13,680 44,783 261 139,333 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 661,250 164,164 89,565 522 915,501 PRESSURIZER 566,785 109,443 89,565 522 766,315 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 62,976 13,680 33,587 196 110,439 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 188,928 27,361 22,391 130 238,811 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 629,762 109,443 89,565 522 829,291 STEAM GENERATORS 3,363,242 437,772 358,260 2,087 4,161,361 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 519,553 95,763 78,369 456 694,142 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 8,282,625 1,381,716 4,601,408 26,802 14,292,551 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 75,116,547 10,889,567 41,524,629 241,871 127,772,613 FILTER CARTRIDGES 49,594 82,082 470,217 778,171 1,380,064 SPENT RESINS 314,881 273,607 223,913 558,083 1,370,484 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 1,098,147 410,411 10,411,945 60,647 11,981,150 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 495,937 410,411 4,702,169 1,081,624 6,690,141 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 1,479,940 1,285,954 1,052,390 1,081,624 4,899,908 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 2,449,156 136,804 1,354,672 7,891 3,948,522 HEAVY OBJECT SURCHARGE 243,872 SITE AVAILABILITY CHARGES 883,505 OPERATING MARGIN 9,064,312 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 101,903,154 18,783,134 69,189,055 7,241,389 207,308,422 TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 8,914,262 TAXES & FEES ($/UNIT VOL.)

22,099,781 ANNUAL PERMIT FEES (3 YRS) 212,000 TOTAL PWR COSTS 238,534,465 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-17 Table B-14 BWR Burial Costs at the Washington Site (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT VOLUME CHARGE SHIPMENT CHARGE CONTAINER CHARGE CONTAINER DOSE RATE CHARGE DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 55,599 191,525 313,478 1,081,624 1,642,226 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 27,800 95,763 156,739 390,658 670,959 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 83,399 109,443 89,565 1,081,624 1,364,031 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 22,240 82,082 134,348 334,850 573,520 JET PUMPS 77,839 273,607 447,826 1,081,624 1,880,896 TOP FUEL GUIDES 133,439 984,986 806,086 1,081,624 3,006,134 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 61,159 218,886 347,065 865,029 1,492,139 CORE SHROUD(a) 261,317 1,915,250 1,567,390 1,081,624 4,825,581 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 44,480 273,607 246,304 613,892 1,178,282 SAC SHIELD NEUTRON-ACTIVATED MATL 500,395 191,525 156,739 913 849,572 REACT. WATER REC 489,275 68,402 67,174 391 625,242 SAC SHIELD CONTAMINATED MATERIAL 1,723,583 519,854 425,434 2,478 2,671,349 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 19,659,965 2,325,661 10,859,771 63,256 32,908,652 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 266,877 13,680 22,391 130 303,079 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 94,519 27,361 22,391 130 144,401 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 55,599 13,680 11,196 65 80,541 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 177,918 27,361 67,174 391 272,844 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 72,279 13,680 33,587 196 119,742 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 344,717 68,402 78,369 456 491,944 POOL LINER & RACKS 2,118,339 246,246 414,239 2,413 2,781,237 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 2,413,016 383,050 1,209,129 7,043 4,012,238 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 7,889,562 629,297 4,366,300 25,433 12,910,590 TURBINE 7,817,282 1,121,790 3,112,388 18,129 12,069,589 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 2,018,260 177,845 492,608 2,869 2,691,582 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 4,097,679 574,575 492,608 2,869 5,167,732 MAIN STEAM 394,756 27,361 33,587 196 455,899 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 3,975,360 355,689 291,087 1,696 4,623,832 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 1,078,629 82,082 223,913 1,304 1,385,928 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 672,753 109,443 89,565 522 872,283 OTHER TG BLDG 27,004,652 3,255,926 14,375,202 83,732 44,719,511 RAD WASTE BLDG 13,371,667 984,986 7,187,601 41,866 21,586,120 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 1,150,075 82,082 11,027,705 64,234 12,324,096 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 517,242 437,772 4,959,669 1,081,624 6,996,305 TG BLDG - CLASS A 776,446 54,721 7,445,101 43,366 8,319,634 TG BLDG - CLASS B 349,109 287,288 3,347,496 1,081,624 5,065,517 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 670,196 54,721 6,426,297 37,432 7,188,646 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 301,238 259,927 2,888,475 1,081,624 4,531,264 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 2,735,493 2,366,702 1,936,846 802,042 7,841,083 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 822,872 711,379 582,173 1,081,624 3,198,048 OTHER 967,430 834,502 682,934 3,978 2,488,844 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 200,158 13,680 156,739 913 371,490 HEAVY OBJECT SURCHARGE 353,090 SITE AVAILABILITY CHARGES 883,505 OPERATING MARGIN 9,064,312 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 105,494,614 20,465,819 87,594,687 13,147,486 237,003,513 TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 10,191,151 TAXES & FEES ($/UNIT VOL.)

22,949,577 ANNUAL PERMIT FEES (3 YRS) 212,000 TOTAL BWR COSTS 270,356,241 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-18 Table B-15 PWR Burial Costs at the Washington Site (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT VOLUME CHARGE SHIPMENT CHARGE CONTAINER CHARGE CONTAINER DOSE RATE CHARGE DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 396,863 416,547 332,306 781,880 1,927,596 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 417,750 438,470 349,796 1,932 1,207,948 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 41,775 43,847 34,980 54,946 175,548 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 41,775 43,847 34,980 54,946 175,548 UPPER CORE BARREL 20,888 21,924 17,490 41,152 101,452 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 52,219 54,809 43,725 102,879 253,631 GUIDE TUBES 62,663 65,771 52,469 82,419 263,322 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 334,200 350,776 279,837 658,426 1,623,239 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 62,663 65,771 52,469 123,455 304,357 CORE SHROUD(a) 41,775 43,847 34,980 82,303 202,905 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 52,219 54,809 43,725 102,879 253,631 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 10,444 10,962 8,745 20,576 50,726 LOWER CORE FORGING 114,881 120,579 96,194 226,334 557,988 MISC INTERNALS 83,550 87,694 69,959 164,606 405,810 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 2,606,760 537,126 1,705,256 9,419 4,858,560 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 53,472 10,962 34,980 193 99,607 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 438,638 131,541 69,959 386 640,524 PRESSURIZER 375,975 87,694 69,959 386 534,015 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 41,775 10,962 26,235 145 79,116 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 125,325 21,924 17,490 97 164,835 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 417,750 87,694 69,959 386 575,790 STEAM GENERATORS 2,230,994 350,776 279,837 1,546 2,863,153 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 344,644 76,732 61,214 338 482,928 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 5,494,248 1,107,138 3,594,154 19,851 10,215,391 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 49,828,280 8,725,561 32,434,834 179,145 91,167,820 FILTER CARTRIDGES 32,898 65,771 367,286 576,934 1,042,888 SPENT RESINS 208,875 219,235 174,898 411,516 1,014,524 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 728,452 328,853 8,132,757 44,919 9,234,980 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 328,978 328,853 3,672,858 948,041 5,278,730 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 981,713 1,030,405 822,021 948,041 3,782,180 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 1,624,638 109,618 1,058,133 5,844 2,798,233 HEAVY OBJECT SURCHARGE 229,873 SITE AVAILABILITY CHARGES 796,630 OPERATING MARGIN 7,944,852 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 67,597,076 15,050,496 54,043,482 5,645,920 151,308,329 TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 6,506,258 TAXES & FEES ($/UNIT VOL.)

22,099,781 ANNUAL PERMIT FEES (3 YRS) 212,000 TOTAL PWR COSTS 180,126,369 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-19 Table B-16 BWR Burial Costs at the Washington Site (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT VOLUME CHARGE SHIPMENT CHARGE CONTAINER CHARGE CONTAINER DOSE RATE CHARGE DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 36,882 153,465 244,857 911,914 1,383,245 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 18,441 76,732 122,429 371,234 505,663 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 55,323 87,694 69,959 911,914 1,161,017 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 14,753 65,771 104,939 318,200 432,372 JET PUMPS 51,634 219,235 349,796 911,914 1,568,707 TOP FUEL GUIDES 88,516 789,247 629,633 911,914 2,455,437 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 40,570 175,388 271,092 822,018 1,124,900 CORE SHROUD(a) 173,344 1,534,646 1,224,286 911,914 3,880,317 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 29,505 219,235 192,388 583,367 893,796 SAC SHIELD NEUTRON-ACTIVATED MATL 331,935 153,465 122,429 872 608,505 REACT. WATER REC 324,559 54,809 52,469 374 432,127 SAC SHIELD CONTAMINATED MATERIAL 1,143,332 416,547 332,306 2,368 1,894,021 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 13,041,364 1,863,499 8,482,553 60,438 23,434,267 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 177,032 10,962 17,490 125 205,580 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 62,699 21,924 17,490 125 102,209 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 36,882 10,962 8,745 62 56,637 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 118,021 21,924 52,469 374 192,704 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 47,946 10,962 26,235 187 85,288 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 228,666 54,809 61,214 436 345,028 POOL LINER & RACKS 1,405,192 197,312 323,561 2,305 1,927,852 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 1,600,665 306,929 944,449 6,729 2,857,260 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 5,233,511 504,241 3,410,511 24,300 9,167,100 TURBINE 5,185,565 898,864 2,431,082 17,321 8,528,939 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 1,338,805 142,503 384,776 2,742 1,868,209 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 2,718,180 460,394 384,776 2,742 3,565,475 MAIN STEAM 261,860 21,924 26,235 187 310,163 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 2,637,041 285,006 227,367 1,620 3,150,669 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 715,505 65,771 174,898 1,246 957,139 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 446,268 87,694 69,959 498 604,308 OTHER TG BLDG 17,913,435 2,608,899 11,228,452 80,002 31,812,802 RAD WASTE BLDG 8,870,045 789,247 5,614,226 40,001 15,304,526 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 762,898 65,771 8,613,727 61,372 9,489,970 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 343,110 350,776 3,873,991 911,914 5,515,918 TG BLDG - CLASS A 515,053 43,847 5,815,359 41,434 6,406,378 TG BLDG - CLASS B 231,580 230,197 2,614,725 911,914 4,024,543 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 444,572 43,847 5,019,573 35,764 5,535,716 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 199,825 208,273 2,256,184 911,914 3,550,288 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 1,814,579 1,896,384 1,512,868 766,403 5,817,936 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 545,849 570,012 454,735 911,914 2,518,636 OTHER 641,741 668,667 533,439 3,801 1,846,794 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 132,774 10,962 122,429 872 266,841 HEAVY OBJECT SURCHARGE 332,821 SITE AVAILABILITY CHARGES 796,630 OPERATING MARGIN 7,944,852 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 69,979,457 16,398,793 68,420,098 10,990,933 174,863,584 TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 7,519,134 TAXES & FEES ($/UNIT VOL.)

22,949,577 ANNUAL PERMIT FEES (3 YRS) 212,000 TOTAL BWR COSTS 205,544,294 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-20 Table B-17 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Facility and the Texas Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

0 827,640 827,640 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,839,200 1,839,200 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 0

0 0

0 0

0 87,120 87,120 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 0

0 0

0 0

0 87,120 87,120 UPPER CORE BARREL 200,000 150,000 0

0 50,000 0

0 400,000 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 500,000 375,000 0

0 1,100,000 0

0 1,975,000 GUIDE TUBES 0

0 0

0 0

0 130,680 130,680 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 3,200,000 2,400,000 0

0 7,040,000 0

0 12,640,000 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 600,000 450,000 0

0 1,320,000 0

0 2,370,000 CORE SHROUD(a) 400,000 300,000 0

0 13,420,000 0

0 14,120,000 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 500,000 375,000 0

0 2,200,000 0

0 3,075,000 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 100,000 75,000 0

0 220,000 0

0 395,000 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,100,000 825,000 0

0 125,000 0

0 2,050,000 MISC INTERNALS 800,000 600,000 0

0 100,000 0

0 1,500,000 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

0 5,436,288 5,436,288 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 0

0 0

0 0

0 111,514 111,514 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,931,160 1,931,160 PRESSURIZER 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,655,280 1,655,280 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 0

0 0

0 0

0 87,120 87,120 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 0

0 0

0 0

0 261,360 261,360 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 0

0 0

0 0

0 871,200 871,200 STEAM GENERATORS 0

0 0

0 0

0 9,822,248 9,822,248 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 0

0 0

0 0

0 718,740 718,740 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 0

0 0

0 0

0 11,458,022 11,458,022 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 0

0 0

0 0

0 103,914,776 103,914,776 FILTER CARTRIDGES 315,000 0

0 0

250,000 0

0 565,000 SPENT RESINS 2,000,000 0

0 0 2,100,000 0

0 4,100,000 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 5,263,335 5,263,335 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 3,150,000 0

0 0

26,250 0

0 3,176,250 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,243,253 2,243,253 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,388,115 3,388,115 TOTAL PWR COSTS 12,865,000 5,550,000 0

0 27,951,250 0

150,134,170 196,500,420 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-21 Table B-18 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Texas Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 353,146 1,050,000 0

0 480,018 0

0 1,883,164 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 176,573 525,000 0

0 35,001 0

0 736,574 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 529,719 600,000 0

0 1,760,350 211,888 0

3,101,956 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 0

0 0

0 0

0 30,766 30,766 JET PUMPS 494,404 1,500,000 0

0 1,000,037 197,762 0

3,192,203 TOP FUEL GUIDES 847,550 5,400,000 0

0 1,505,056 339,020 0

8,091,626 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 0

0 0

0 0

0 84,607 84,607 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,659,786 10,500,000 0

0 30,811,655 663,914 0

43,635,356 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

0 61,532 61,532 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

0 692,237 692,237 REACT. WATER REC 0

0 0

0 0

0 676,854 676,854 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,384,371 2,384,371 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 0

0 0

0 0

0 27,197,214 27,197,214 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 0

0 0

0 0

0 369,193 369,193 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

0 130,756 130,756 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

0 76,915 76,915 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

0 246,129 246,129 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

0 99,990 99,990 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 0

0 0

0 0

0 476,874 476,874 POOL LINER & RACKS 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,930,469 2,930,469 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,338,120 3,338,120 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 0

0 0

0 0

0 10,914,267 10,914,267 TURBINE 0

0 0

0 0

0 22,830,140 22,830,140 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,792,022 2,792,022 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 5,668,650 5,668,650 MAIN STEAM 0

0 0

0 0

0 546,098 546,098 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 5,499,437 5,499,437 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,150,105 3,150,105 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 930,674 930,674 OTHER TG BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

0 37,357,712 37,357,712 RAD WASTE BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

0 18,498,105 18,498,105 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 5,512,221 5,512,221 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 3,285,317 0

0 0

27,688 0

0 3,313,005 TG BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,721,449 3,721,449 TG BLDG - CLASS B 2,217,404 0

0 0

18,688 0

0 2,236,091 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,212,198 3,212,198 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 1,913,345 0

0 0

16,125 0

0 1,929,470 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 554,256 554,256 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 5,226,561 0

0 0

1,560,000 0

0 6,786,561 OTHER 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,338,324 1,338,324 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

0 276,895 276,895 TOTAL BWR COSTS 16,703,806 19,575,000 0

0 37,214,616 1,412,584 161,598,578 236,504,584 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-22 Table B-19 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Facility and the South Carolina Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE CASK HANDLING CURIE SURCHARGE LINER DOSE RATE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

827,640 827,640 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 0

0 0

0 0

1,839,200 1,839,200 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 0

0 0

0 0

87,120 87,120 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 0

0 0

0 0

87,120 87,120 UPPER CORE BARREL 156,204 225,428 594,000 0

74,978 0

1,050,610 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 390,510 563,570 1,485,000 0

187,445 0

2,626,525 GUIDE TUBES 0

0 0

0 0

130,680 130,680 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 2,499,264 3,606,848 9,504,000 0

1,199,647 0

16,809,759 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 468,612 676,284 1,782,000 0

224,934 0

3,151,830 CORE SHROUD(a) 362,788 450,856 18,117,000 0

174,138 0

19,104,782 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 390,510 563,570 2,970,000 0

187,445 0

4,111,525 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 99,064 112,714 297,000 0

47,551 0

556,328 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,076,315 1,239,854 1,857,500 0

516,631 0

4,690,300 MISC INTERNALS 872,800 901,712 1,486,000 0

418,944 0

3,679,456 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

5,436,288 5,436,288 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 0

0 0

0 0

111,514 111,514 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

1,931,160 1,931,160 PRESSURIZER 0

0 0

0 0

1,655,280 1,655,280 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 0

0 0

0 0

87,120 87,120 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 0

0 0

0 0

261,360 261,360 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 0

0 0

0 0

871,200 871,200 STEAM GENERATORS 0

0 0

0 0

9,822,248 9,822,248 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 0

0 0

0 0

718,740 718,740 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 0

0 0

0 0

11,458,022 11,458,022 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 0

0 0

0 0

103,914,776 103,914,776 FILTER CARTRIDGES 535,518 676,284 1,782,000 0

64,262 0

3,058,064 SPENT RESINS 1,963,800 2,254,280 5,940,000 0

942,624 0

11,100,704 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

5,263,335 5,263,335 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 2,945,700 6,762,840 390,075 0

235,656 0

10,334,271 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 0

0 0

0 0

2,243,253 2,243,253 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

3,388,115 3,388,115 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 11,761,084 18,034,240 46,204,575 0

4,274,254 150,134,170 230,408,323 ATLANTIC COMPACT COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE 77,190 TOTAL PWR COSTS (INSIDE COMPACT) 230,485,513 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-23 Table B-20 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the South Carolina Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE CASK HANDLING CURIE SURCHARGE LINER DOSE RATE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 363,503 3,155,992 4,158,000 0

174,481 0

7,851,976 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 159,962 1,577,996 520,100 0

76,782 0

2,334,840 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 476,479 901,712 2,376,000 0

228,710 0

3,982,900 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 0

0 0

0 0

30,766 30,766 JET PUMPS 386,140 4,508,560 5,940,000 0

185,347 0

11,020,047 TOP FUEL GUIDES 661,954 8,115,408 21,384,000 0

317,738 0

30,479,100 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 0

0 0

0 0

84,607 84,607 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,296,326 15,779,960 41,580,000 0

622,237 0

59,278,523 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

61,532 61,532 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

692,237 692,237 REACT. WATER REC 0

0 0

0 0

676,854 676,854 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

2,384,371 2,384,371 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 0

0 0

0 0

27,197,214 27,197,214 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 0

0 0

0 0

369,193 369,193 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

130,756 130,756 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

76,915 76,915 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

246,129 246,129 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

99,990 99,990 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 0

0 0

0 0

476,874 476,874 POOL LINER & RACKS 0

0 0

0 0

2,930,469 2,930,469 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

3,338,120 3,338,120 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 0

0 0

0 0

10,914,267 10,914,267 TURBINE 0

0 0

0 0

22,830,140 22,830,140 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 0

0 0

0 0

2,792,022 2,792,022 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

5,668,650 5,668,650 MAIN STEAM 0

0 0

0 0

546,098 546,098 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

5,499,437 5,499,437 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

3,150,105 3,150,105 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

930,674 930,674 OTHER TG BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

37,357,712 37,357,712 RAD WASTE BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

18,498,105 18,498,105 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

5,512,221 5,512,221 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 14,279,321 7,213,696 411,436 0

1,142,346 0

23,046,799 TG BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

3,721,449 3,721,449 TG BLDG - CLASS B 9,370,804 4,733,988 277,696 0

749,664 0

15,132,153 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

3,212,198 3,212,198 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 8,478,347 4,283,132 239,618 0

678,268 0

13,679,364 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

554,256 554,256 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 8,765,411 5,861,128 15,444,000 0

1,544,334 0

31,614,873 OTHER 0

0 0

0 0

1,338,324 1,338,324 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

276,895 276,895 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 44,238,246 56,131,572 92,330,850 0

5,719,906 161,598,578 360,019,152 ATLANTIC COMPACT COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE 100,223 TOTAL BWR COSTS (INSIDE COMPACT) 360,119,375 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-24 Table B-21 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Washington Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT VOLUME CHARGE SHIPMENT CHARGE CONTAINER CHARGE CONTAINER DOSE RATE CHARGE WASTE VENDOR CHARGE DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 827,640 827,640 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 0

0 0

0 1,839,200 1,839,200 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 0

0 0

0 87,120 87,120 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 0

0 0

0 87,120 87,120 UPPER CORE BARREL 31,488 27,361 22,391 55,808 0

137,048 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 78,720 68,402 55,978 139,521 0

342,621 GUIDE TUBES 0

0 0

0 130,680 130,680 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 503,809 437,772 358,260 892,933 0

2,192,774 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 94,464 82,082 67,174 167,425 0

411,145 CORE SHROUD(a) 62,976 54,721 44,783 111,617 0

274,097 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 78,720 68,402 55,978 139,521 0

342,621 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 15,744 13,680 11,196 27,904 0

68,524 LOWER CORE FORGING 173,184 150,484 123,152 306,946 0

753,766 MISC INTERNALS 125,952 109,443 89,565 223,233 0

548,194 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 5,436,288 5,436,288 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 0

0 0

0 111,514 111,514 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 0

0 0

0 1,931,160 1,931,160 PRESSURIZER 0

0 0

0 1,655,280 1,655,280 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 0

0 0

0 87,120 87,120 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 0

0 0

0 261,360 261,360 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 0

0 0

0 871,200 871,200 STEAM GENERATORS 0

0 0

0 9,822,248 9,822,248 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 0

0 0

0 718,740 718,740 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 0

0 0

0 11,458,022 11,458,022 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 0

0 0

0 103,914,776 103,914,776 FILTER CARTRIDGES 49,594 82,082 470,217 778,171 0

1,380,064 SPENT RESINS 314,881 273,607 223,913 558,083 0

1,370,484 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 5,263,335 5,263,335 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 495,937 410,411 4,702,169 1,081,624 0

6,690,141 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 0

0 0

0 2,243,253 2,243,253 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 3,388,115 3,388,115 HEAVY OBJECT SURCHARGE 0

SITE AVAILABILITY CHARGES 883,505 OPERATING MARGIN 3,453,732 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 2,025,471 1,778,447 6,224,776 4,482,786 150,134,170 168,982,886 TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 810,495 TAXES & FEES ($/UNIT VOL.)

372,126 ANNUAL PERMIT FEES (3 YRS) 212,000 TOTAL PWR COSTS 170,377,507 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-25 Table B-22 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Washington Disposal Facility (2024 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT VOLUME CHARGE SHIPMENT CHARGE CONTAINER CHARGE CONTAINER DOSE RATE CHARGE VENDOR CHARGE DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 55,599 191,525 313,478 1,081,624 0

1,642,226 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 27,800 95,763 156,739 390,658 0

670,959 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 83,399 109,443 89,565 1,081,624 0

1,364,031 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 0

0 0

0 30,766 30,766 JET PUMPS 77,839 273,607 447,826 1,081,624 0

1,880,896 TOP FUEL GUIDES 133,439 984,986 806,086 1,081,624 0

3,006,134 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 0

0 0

0 84,607 84,607 CORE SHROUD(a) 261,317 1,915,250 1,567,390 1,081,624 0

4,825,581 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 61,532 61,532 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 0

0 0

0 692,237 692,237 REACT. WATER REC 0

0 0

0 676,854 676,854 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 0

0 0

0 2,384,371 2,384,371 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 0

0 0

0 27,197,214 27,197,214 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 0

0 0

0 369,193 369,193 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 130,756 130,756 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 76,915 76,915 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 0

0 0

0 246,129 246,129 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 0

0 0

0 99,990 99,990 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 0

0 0

0 476,874 476,874 POOL LINER & RACKS 0

0 0

0 2,930,469 2,930,469 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 3,338,120 3,338,120 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 0

0 0

0 10,914,267 10,914,267 TURBINE 0

0 0

0 22,830,140 22,830,140 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 0

0 0

0 2,792,022 2,792,022 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 5,668,650 5,668,650 MAIN STEAM 0

0 0

0 546,098 546,098 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 0

0 0

0 5,499,437 5,499,437 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 0

0 0

0 3,150,105 3,150,105 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 930,674 930,674 OTHER TG BLDG 0

0 0

0 37,357,712 37,357,712 RAD WASTE BLDG 0

0 0

0 18,498,105 18,498,105 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 5,512,221 5,512,221 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 517,242 437,772 4,959,669 1,081,624 0

6,996,305 TG BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 3,721,449 3,721,449 TG BLDG - CLASS B 349,109 287,288 3,347,496 1,081,624 0

5,065,517 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 3,212,198 3,212,198 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 301,238 259,927 2,888,475 1,081,624 0

4,531,264 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 554,256 554,256 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 822,872 711,379 582,173 1,081,624 0

3,198,048 OTHER 0

0 0

0 1,338,324 1,338,324 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 276,895 276,895 HEAVY OBJECT SURCHARGE 0

SITE AVAILABILITY CHARGES 883,505 OPERATING MARGIN 7,897,069 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 2,629,854 5,266,939 15,158,897 10,125,272 161,598,578 203,560,113 TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 1,804,346 TAXES & FEES ($/UNIT VOL.)

572,105 ANNUAL PERMIT FEES (3 YRS) 212,000 TOTAL BWR COSTS 206,148,564 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-26 Table B-23 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Facility and the Texas Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

0 957,220 957,220 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,129,600 2,129,600 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 0

0 0

0 0

0 100,760 100,760 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 0

0 0

0 0

0 100,760 100,760 UPPER CORE BARREL 200,000 150,000 0

0 50,000 0

0 400,000 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 500,000 375,000 0

0 1,100,000 0

0 1,975,000 GUIDE TUBES 0

0 0

0 0

0 151,140 151,140 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 3,200,000 2,400,000 0

0 7,040,000 0

0 12,640,000 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 600,000 450,000 0

0 1,320,000 0

0 2,370,000 CORE SHROUD(a) 400,000 300,000 0

0 13,420,000 0

0 14,120,000 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 500,000 375,000 0

0 2,200,000 0

0 3,075,000 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 100,000 75,000 0

0 220,000 0

0 395,000 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,100,000 825,000 0

0 125,000 0

0 2,050,000 MISC INTERNALS 800,000 600,000 0

0 100,000 0

0 1,500,000 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

0 6,287,424 6,287,424 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 0

0 0

0 0

0 128,973 128,973 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,236,080 2,236,080 PRESSURIZER 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,916,640 1,916,640 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 0

0 0

0 0

0 100,760 100,760 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 0

0 0

0 0

0 302,280 302,280 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,007,600 1,007,600 STEAM GENERATORS 0

0 0

0 0

0 11,373,129 11,373,129 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 0

0 0

0 0

0 831,270 831,270 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 0

0 0

0 0

0 13,251,955 13,251,955 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 0

0 0

0 0

0 120,184,261 120,184,261 FILTER CARTRIDGES 315,000 0

0 0

250,000 0

0 565,000 SPENT RESINS 2,000,000 0

0 0 2,100,000 0

0 4,100,000 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 6,091,965 6,091,965 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 3,150,000 0

0 0

26,250 0

0 3,176,250 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,552,667 2,552,667 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,918,577 3,918,577 TOTAL PWR COSTS 12,865,000 5,550,000 0

0 27,951,250 0

173,623,060 219,989,310 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-27 Table B-24 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Texas Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE IRRADIATED HARDWARE HANDLE SURCHARGE CASK HANDLE SURCHARGE WEIGHT SURCHARGE CURIE CHARGE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 353,146 1,050,000 0

0 480,150 0

0 1,883,296 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 176,573 525,000 0

0 35,009 0

0 736,582 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 529,719 600,000 0

0 1,762,100 211,888 0

3,103,707 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 0

0 0

0 0

0 35,583 35,583 JET PUMPS 494,404 1,500,000 0

0 1,000,644 197,762 0

3,192,810 TOP FUEL GUIDES 847,550 5,400,000 0

0 1,509,440 339,020 0

8,096,011 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 0

0 0

0 0

0 97,853 97,853 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,659,786 10,500,000 0

0 30,933,950 663,914 0

43,757,651 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

0 71,166 71,166 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

0 800,617 800,617 REACT. WATER REC 0

0 0

0 0

0 782,826 782,826 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

0 2,757,682 2,757,682 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 0

0 0

0 0

0 31,455,364 31,455,364 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 0

0 0

0 0

0 426,996 426,996 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

0 151,228 151,228 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

0 88,957 88,957 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

0 284,664 284,664 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

0 115,645 115,645 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 0

0 0

0 0

0 551,536 551,536 POOL LINER & RACKS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,389,280 3,389,280 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,860,755 3,860,755 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 0

0 0

0 0

0 12,623,066 12,623,066 TURBINE 0

0 0

0 0

0 26,434,899 26,434,899 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,229,156 3,229,156 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 6,556,166 6,556,166 MAIN STEAM 0

0 0

0 0

0 631,598 631,598 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 6,360,460 6,360,460 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

0 3,647,490 3,647,490 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,076,385 1,076,385 OTHER TG BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

0 43,206,647 43,206,647 RAD WASTE BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

0 21,394,273 21,394,273 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,840,085 1,840,085 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 3,285,317 0

0 0

27,688 0

0 3,313,005 TG BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,242,291 1,242,291 TG BLDG - CLASS B 2,217,404 0

0 0

18,688 0

0 2,236,091 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,072,293 1,072,293 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 1,913,345 0

0 0

16,125 0

0 1,929,470 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

0 630,705 630,705 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 5,226,561 0

0 0

1,560,000 0

0 6,786,561 OTHER 0

0 0

0 0

0 1,547,860 1,547,860 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

0 320,247 320,247 TOTAL BWR COSTS 16,703,806 19,575,000 0

0 37,343,793 1,412,584 176,683,774 251,718,957 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-28 Table B-25 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Facility and the South Carolina Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE CASK HANDLING CURIE SURCHARGE LINER DOSE RATE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

957,220 957,220 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 0

0 0

0 0

2,129,600 2,129,600 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 0

0 0

0 0

100,760 100,760 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 0

0 0

0 0

100,760 100,760 UPPER CORE BARREL 154,377 222,788 587,200 0

74,101 0

1,038,466 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 385,943 556,970 1,468,000 0

185,252 0

2,596,165 GUIDE TUBES 0

0 0

0 0

151,140 151,140 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 2,470,032 3,564,608 9,395,200 0

1,185,615 0

16,615,455 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 463,131 668,364 1,761,600 0

222,303 0

3,115,398 CORE SHROUD(a) 358,560 445,576 17,909,600 0

172,109 0

18,885,845 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 385,943 556,970 2,936,000 0

185,252 0

4,064,165 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 97,909 111,394 293,600 0

46,997 0

549,900 LOWER CORE FORGING 1,063,772 1,225,334 1,835,000 0

510,611 0

4,634,717 MISC INTERNALS 862,560 891,152 1,468,000 0

414,029 0

3,635,741 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

6,287,424 6,287,424 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 0

0 0

0 0

128,973 128,973 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

2,236,080 2,236,080 PRESSURIZER 0

0 0

0 0

1,916,640 1,916,640 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 0

0 0

0 0

100,760 100,760 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 0

0 0

0 0

302,280 302,280 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 0

0 0

0 0

1,007,600 1,007,600 STEAM GENERATORS 0

0 0

0 0

11,373,129 11,373,129 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 0

0 0

0 0

831,270 831,270 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 0

0 0

0 0

13,251,955 13,251,955 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 0

0 0

0 0

120,184,261 120,184,261 FILTER CARTRIDGES 529,254 668,364 1,761,600 0

63,510 0

3,022,728 SPENT RESINS 1,940,760 2,227,880 5,872,000 0

931,565 0

10,972,205 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

6,091,965 6,091,965 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 2,911,140 6,683,640 385,350 0

232,891 0

10,213,021 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 0

0 0

0 0

2,552,667 2,552,667 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

3,918,577 3,918,577 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 11,623,381 17,823,040 45,673,150 0

4,224,235 173,623,060 252,966,867 ATLANTIC COMPACT COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE 77,190 OTAL PWR COSTS (INSIDE COMPACT) 253,044,057 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-29 Table B-26 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the South Carolina Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT BASE DISPOSAL CHARGE CASK HANDLING CURIE SURCHARGE LINER DOSE RATE DOSE RATE SURCHARGE VENDOR CHARGES DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 359,251 3,119,032 4,110,400 0

172,440 0

7,761,123 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 158,098 1,559,516 513,800 0

75,887 0

2,307,301 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 470,888 891,152 2,348,800 0

226,026 0

3,936,867 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 0

0 0

0 0

35,583 35,583 JET PUMPS 381,623 4,455,760 5,872,000 0

183,179 0

10,892,563 TOP FUEL GUIDES 654,211 8,020,368 21,139,200 0

314,021 0

30,127,801 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 0

0 0

0 0

97,853 97,853 CORE SHROUD(a) 1,281,164 15,595,160 41,104,000 0

614,959 0

58,595,283 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 0

71,166 71,166 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

800,617 800,617 REACT. WATER REC 0

0 0

0 0

782,826 782,826 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 0

0 0

0 0

2,757,682 2,757,682 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 0

0 0

0 0

31,455,364 31,455,364 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 0

0 0

0 0

426,996 426,996 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

151,228 151,228 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 0

88,957 88,957 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

284,664 284,664 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 0

0 0

0 0

115,645 115,645 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 0

0 0

0 0

551,536 551,536 POOL LINER & RACKS 0

0 0

0 0

3,389,280 3,389,280 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 0

3,860,755 3,860,755 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 0

0 0

0 0

12,623,066 12,623,066 TURBINE 0

0 0

0 0

26,434,899 26,434,899 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 0

0 0

0 0

3,229,156 3,229,156 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

6,556,166 6,556,166 MAIN STEAM 0

0 0

0 0

631,598 631,598 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

6,360,460 6,360,460 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 0

0 0

0 0

3,647,490 3,647,490 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 0

1,076,385 1,076,385 OTHER TG BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

43,206,647 43,206,647 RAD WASTE BLDG 0

0 0

0 0

21,394,273 21,394,273 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

1,840,085 1,840,085 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 14,112,295 7,129,216 406,453 0

1,128,984 0

22,776,947 TG BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

1,242,291 1,242,291 TG BLDG - CLASS B 9,261,193 4,678,548 274,333 0

740,895 0

14,954,969 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

1,072,293 1,072,293 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 8,379,175 4,232,972 236,715 0

670,334 0

13,519,196 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 0

630,705 630,705 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 8,662,881 5,792,488 15,267,200 0

1,526,270 0

31,248,839 OTHER 0

0 0

0 0

1,547,860 1,547,860 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 0

320,247 320,247 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 43,720,780 55,474,212 91,272,900 0

5,652,996 176,683,774 372,804,662 ATLANTIC COMPACT COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE 100,223 TOTAL BWR COSTS (INSIDE COMPACT) 372,904,885 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-30 Table B-27 PWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Washington Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE PWR COMPONENT VOLUME CHARGE SHIPMENT CHARGE CONTAINER CHARGE CONTAINER DOSE RATE CHARGE WASTE VENDOR CHARGE DISPOSAL COST VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 957,220 957,220 VESSEL HEAD & BOTTOM 0

0 0

0 2,129,600 2,129,600 UPPER CORE SUPPORT ASSM 0

0 0

0 100,760 100,760 UPPER SUPPORT COLUMN 0

0 0

0 100,760 100,760 UPPER CORE BARREL 20,888 21,924 17,490 41,152 0

101,452 UPPER CORE GRID PLATE 52,219 54,809 43,725 102,879 0

253,631 GUIDE TUBES 0

0 0

0 151,140 151,140 LOWER CORE BARREL(a) 334,200 350,776 279,837 658,426 0

1,623,239 THERMAL SHIELDS(a) 62,663 65,771 52,469 123,455 0

304,357 CORE SHROUD(a) 41,775 43,847 34,980 82,303 0

202,905 LOWER GRID PLATE(a) 52,219 54,809 43,725 102,879 0

253,631 LOWER SUPPORT COLUMN 10,444 10,962 8,745 20,576 0

50,726 LOWER CORE FORGING 114,881 120,579 96,194 226,334 0

557,988 MISC INTERNALS 83,550 87,694 69,959 164,606 0

405,810 BIO SHIELD CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 6,287,424 6,287,424 REACTOR CAVITY LINER 0

0 0

0 128,973 128,973 REACTOR COOLANT PUMPS 0

0 0

0 2,236,080 2,236,080 PRESSURIZER 0

0 0

0 1,916,640 1,916,640 R.Hx,EHx,SUMP PUMP,CAVITY PUMP 0

0 0

0 100,760 100,760 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 0

0 0

0 302,280 302,280 SAFETY INJECTION ACCUM TANKS 0

0 0

0 1,007,600 1,007,600 STEAM GENERATORS 0

0 0

0 11,373,129 11,373,129 REACTOR COOLANT PIPING 0

0 0

0 831,270 831,270 REMAINING CONTAM. MATLS 0

0 0

0 13,251,955 13,251,955 CONTAMINATED MATRL OTHR BLD 0

0 0

0 120,184,261 120,184,261 FILTER CARTRIDGES 32,898 65,771 367,286 576,934 0

1,042,888 SPENT RESINS 208,875 219,235 174,898 411,516 0

1,014,524 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 6,091,965 6,091,965 COMBUSTIBLE WASTES - CLASS B 328,978 328,853 3,672,858 948,041 0

5,278,730 EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS 0

0 0

0 2,552,667 2,552,667 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 3,918,577 3,918,577 HEAVY OBJECT SURCHARGE 0

SITE AVAILABILITY CHARGES 796,180 OPERATING MARGIN 2,639,392 SUBTOTAL PWR COSTS 1,343,588 1,425,029 4,862,164 3,459,100 173,623,060 188,148,514 TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 624,595 TAXES & FEES ($/UNIT VOL.)

372,126 ANNUAL PERMIT FEES (3 YRS) 212,000 TOTAL PWR COSTS 189,357,235 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

B-31 Table B-28 BWR LLW Disposition Costs Using a Combination of Non-Compact Disposal Facility and the Washington Disposal Facility (2022 dollars)

REFERENCE BWR COMPONENT VOLUME CHARGE SHIPMENT CHARGE CONTAINER CHARGE CONTAINER DOSE RATE CHARGE VENDOR CHARGE DISPOSAL COST STEAM SEPARATOR 36,882 153,465 244,857 948,041 0

1,383,245 FUEL SUPPORT & PIECES 18,441 76,732 122,429 288,061 0

505,663 CONTROL RODS/INCORES 55,323 87,694 69,959 948,041 0

1,161,017 CONTROL RODS GUIDES 0

0 0

0 35,583 35,583 JET PUMPS 51,634 219,235 349,796 948,041 0

1,568,707 TOP FUEL GUIDES 88,516 789,247 629,633 948,041 0

2,455,437 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 0

0 0

0 97,853 97,853 CORE SHROUD(a) 173,344 1,534,646 1,224,286 948,041 0

3,880,317 REACTOR VESSEL WALL 0

0 0

0 71,166 71,166 SAC SHIELD Neutron-Activated Matl 0

0 0

0 800,617 800,617 REACT. WATER REC 0

0 0

0 782,826 782,826 SAC SHIELD Contaminated Matl 0

0 0

0 2,757,682 2,757,682 OTHER PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 0

0 0

0 31,455,364 31,455,364 CONTAINM. ATMOSPHERIC 0

0 0

0 426,996 426,996 HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 151,228 151,228 LOW PRESSURE CORE SPRAY 0

0 0

0 88,957 88,957 REACTOR BLDG CLOSED COOLING 0

0 0

0 284,664 284,664 REACTOR CORE ISO COOLING 0

0 0

0 115,645 115,645 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL 0

0 0

0 551,536 551,536 POOL LINER & RACKS 0

0 0

0 3,389,280 3,389,280 CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 0

0 0

0 3,860,755 3,860,755 OTHER REACTOR BUILDING 0

0 0

0 12,623,066 12,623,066 TURBINE 0

0 0

0 26,434,899 26,434,899 NUCLEAR STEAM CONDENSATE 0

0 0

0 3,229,156 3,229,156 LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 6,556,166 6,556,166 MAIN STEAM 0

0 0

0 631,598 631,598 MOISTURE SEPARATOR REHEATERS 0

0 0

0 6,360,460 6,360,460 REACTOR FEEDWATER PUMPS 0

0 0

0 3,647,490 3,647,490 HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS 0

0 0

0 1,076,385 1,076,385 OTHER TG BLDG 0

0 0

0 43,206,647 43,206,647 RAD WASTE BLDG 0

0 0

0 21,394,273 21,394,273 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 1,840,085 1,840,085 REACTOR BLDG - CLASS B 343,110 350,776 3,873,991 948,041 0

5,515,918 TG BLDG - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 1,242,291 1,242,291 TG BLDG - CLASS B 231,580 230,197 2,614,725 948,041 0

4,024,543 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 1,072,293 1,072,293 RAD WASTE & CONTROL - CLASS B 199,825 208,273 2,256,184 886,006 0

3,550,288 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS A 0

0 0

0 630,705 630,705 CONCENTRATOR BOTTOMS - CLASS B 545,849 570,012 454,735 948,041 0

2,518,636 OTHER 0

0 0

0 1,547,860 1,547,860 POST-TMI-2 ADDITIONS 0

0 0

0 320,247 320,247 HEAVY OBJECT SURCHARGE 0

SITE AVAILABILITY CHARGES 796,180 OPERATING MARGIN 6,322,178 SUBTOTAL BWR COSTS 1,744,504 4,220,278 11,840,595 8,758,396 176,683,774 210,365,903 TAXES & FEES (% OF CHARGES) 1,448,332 TAXES & FEES ($/UNIT VOL.)

572,105 ANNUAL PERMIT FEES (3 YRS) 212,000 TOTAL BWR COSTS 212,598,340 (a) GTCC Material: Assumes a low-density, distributed packaging scheme and final disposal as LLW. High-density packaging, ISFSI storage, and geologic repository disposal could reduce disposal costs.

C-1 APPENDIX C BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS ON THE INTERNET For use in the adjustment formula in Chapter 3, the labor indexes for the first quarter of 2024 and the producer price indexes for March 2024 were obtained from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on the Internet.

These dates were chosen to agree, to the extent possible, with the effective dates of the waste burial rate schedules. Instructions for accessing and obtaining the specific indexes used in this report follow below.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Internet Data Page To obtain reports of producer price indexes and labor indexes, proceed as follows:

1. Enter the URL: http://www.bls.gov/data/
2. Click on the item labeled Series Report.
3. In the box labeled Enter series id(s) below, type in the following six series identifications (IDs), one ID per line:

Series ID Producer Price Indexes wpu0543 (Industrial electric power-used in calculation of Px, per Section 3.3) wpu0573 (Light fuel oils-used in calculation of Fx per Section 3.3)

Labor Indexes (Used in the calculation of Lx, per Section 3.1)

CIU2010000000210I (Total compensation, private industry, Northeast region)

CIU2010000000220I (Total compensation, private industry, South region)

CIU2010000000230I (Total compensation, private industry, Midwest region)

CIU2010000000240I (Total compensation, private industry, West region)

4. Click the button labeled Next.
5. In the box labeled Select view of the data, use Table Format and Original Data value.
6. In the box labeled Select the time frame for your data, specify the years you want and time period.
7. Click on the button labeled Retrieve Data and the six tables of data you requested will be displayed.

D-1 APPENDIX D REPRESENTATIVE EXAMPLES OF DECOMMISSIONING COSTS FOR 2012 THROUGH 2024 In Section 3.5 of this revision and the five previous revisions of NUREG-1307, decommissioning costs for four typical situations were developed. Results of these calculations are summarized below.

Example 1 (No Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facilities)

Reactor Type: BWR Thermal Power Rating: 3400 MWt Location of Plant: Midwest Compact LLW Burial Location: 2012 - Unknown (Generic LLW Disposal Site); Beginning 2016 - Non-Compact Disposal Facilities 2012 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Lx 2.39 2.57 2.70 2.86 3.08 3.34 Ex 2.795 1.632 2.340 2.029 3.906 3.444 Bx 14.160 13.132 13.422 12.837 12.296 11.658 Decommissioning Cost (Millions)

$679

$644

$677

$668

$704

$700 Example 2 (Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only)

Reactor Type: Pressurized-Water Reactor (PWR)

Thermal Power Rating: 3400 MWt Location of Plant: Texas Compact LLW Burial Location: Texas (Texas Compact); 2018 is the first use of the Texas compact as an example calculation for Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only 2012 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Lx NA NA 2.58 2.71 2.92 3.20 Ex NA NA 2.320 2.030 3.768 3.373 Bx NA NA 8.508 8.040 6.650 6.650 Decommissioning Cost (Millions)

NA NA

$404

$398

$404

$418

D-2 Example 3 (Combination of Compact-Affiliated and Non-Compact Disposal Facilities)

Reactor Type: PWR Thermal Power Rating: 3400 MWt Location of Plant: Atlantic Compact LLW Burial Location: South Carolina (Atlantic Compact) and Non-Compact Disposal Site 2012 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Lx 2.52 2.75 2.89 3.06 3.29 3.56 Ex 2.704 1.645 2.320 2.030 3.768 3.373 Bx 13.885 10.971 11.607 11.679 14.067 12.813 Decommissioning Cost (Millions)

$530

$464

$497

$506

$601

$585 Example 4 (Compact-Affiliated Disposal Facility Only)

Reactor Type: Boiling-Water Reactor (BWR)

Thermal Power Rating: 3400 MWt Location of Plant: Northwest Compact LLW Burial Location: Washington 2012 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Lx 2.38 2.60 2.77 2.94 3.18 3.48 Ex 2.795 1.632 2.340 2.029 3.906 3.444 Bx 6.704 7.290 9.118 9.326 8.571 11.274 Decommissioning Cost (Millions)

$457

$473

$555

$571

$602

$701

E-1 APPENDIX E LOW-LEVEL WASTE COMPACTS The figure and table below identify the composition of all LLW compacts as of May 2014 (source: NRC, http://www.nrc.gov/waste/llw-disposal/licensing/compacts.html).

E-2 Compact Affiliated States Northwest Alaska Idaho Oregon Washington(a)

Hawaii Montana Utah Wyoming Southwestern Arizona California(b)

North Dakota South Dakota Rocky Mountain Colorado New Mexico Nevada Midwest Indiana Minnesota Ohio(b)

Wisconsin Iowa Missouri Central Arkansas Kansas Louisiana Oklahoma Texas Texas(a)

Vermont Central Midwest Illinois(b)

Kentucky Appalachian Delaware Maryland Pennsylvania(b)

West Virginia Atlantic Connecticut New Jersey South Carolina(a)

Southeast Alabama Georgia Tennessee Virginia Florida Mississippi Unaffiliated States District of Columbia Michigan New York Rhode Island Massachusetts Nebraska Puerto Rico North Carolina Maine New Hampshire (a) Current Host State for operating LLW disposal sites (3 States)

(b) Selected Host State for future LLW disposal sites (4 States)

F-1 APPENDIX F COMMENT RESOLUTION MATRIX Please see file at ADAMS Accession Number ML25016A004.

PNNL, Steven Short and Mike Toyooka, NRC, Emil Tabakov Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, and Financial Support Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001 Emil Tabakov Same as above NUREG-1307, Revision 20, "Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities", explains the formula acceptable to the NRC for determining the minimum decommissioning fund requirements for nuclear power reactors, as required by the NRC's regulations. Specifically, this report provides adjustment factors, and updates to these values, for the labor, energy, and waste burial components of the minimum formula low-level waste, decommissioning, charges, burial, waste, low-level waste, Rev. 20, NUREG-1307, Clive, Texas Compact Waste Facility, CWF, formula, PWR, BWR, 10 CFR 50.75, minimum amounts, LLW, burial, disposal facility, decommissioning trust fund, minimum formula, cost February 2025 Technical Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities Final Report NUREG-1307, Rev. 20 Final

NUREG-1307, Rev. 20 Final Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities February 2025

`