ML17308A228

Forwards Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-335/86-07 & 50-389/86-06.Corrective Actions:Procedure Changes Generated to Enhance Schedule of Surveillances

ML17308A228
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	05/29/1986
From:	Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
L-86-225, NUDOCS 8606100307
Download: ML17308A228 (5)

See also: IR 05000335/1986007

Text

~lii{V FLORIOA POV'lER&LIGHT COMPANY eY2 L-86-225 Dr.3.Nelson Crace Regional Administrator, Region II U.S.Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street, N.V/.Atlanta, Ceorgia 30323 Dear Dr.Crace: Re: St.Lucie Unit 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-335 and 50-389 Ins ection Re ort 86-07 and 86-06 Florida Power R Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection

report, and a response is attached.There is no proprietary

information

in the report.Very truly yours, C.O.%'oody Group Vice President Nuclear Energy COW/SA V:de Attachment

cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire P NS-LI-86-169

8606100307

860529 PDR ADOCN 05000335 8 PDR L3:1 PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLI.

ATTACHMENT

L-86-225 Re: St.Lucie Unit I and 2 Docket Nos.50-335 and 50-389 Ins ection Re ort 86-07 and 86-06 FINDING Units I and 2 Technical Specification (TS)6.8.1.c requires that procedures

be implemented

for surveillance

and test activities

of safety-related

equipment.

Contrary to the above, Administrative

Operating Procedures

I and 2-0010125, Schedule of Periodic, Tests Checks and Calibrations

and 0010127, Reactor Engineering

Schedule of Periodic Tests and Reports, were not adequately

implemented

in that the following surveillance

tests were not performed within the specified time intervals.

a.On September 29, 1985, the 25 percent time extension was exceeded for the quarterly main steam isolation valve (MSIV)part-stroke

surveillance

test requried by Unit I TS 0.7.1.5.b.On 3anuary 10, 1986, the 25 percent time extension was exceeded for the automatic actuation logic monthly surveillance

test, required by Unit 2 TS Table 0.3-2, for the auxiliary feedwater actuation system (AFAS).c.On February 7, 1986, the 25 percent time extension was exceeded for the monthly setpoint calculation

and adjustment

of the fixed incore alarm system required by Unit 2 TS 0.2.1.0.d.On February 13, 1986, the 25 percent time extension was exceeded for the semi-annual

engineered

safety features actuation system (ESFAS)relay surveillance

test required by Unit 2 TS Table 0.3-2.L3:I

L-86-225 Re: St.Lucie Unit 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-335 and 50-389 Ins ection Re ort 86-07 and 86-06 Page 2 RESPONSE 1.FPL concurs with the violation.

2.The reason for the violation is as follows: a.The quarterly main steam isolation valve (MSIV)part-stroke

surveillance

test required by Unit 1 Technical Specification 0.7.1.5 exceeded the 25'6 extension time due to a cognitive personnel error.The operator reviewed only the semi-annual, annual, and 18-month surveillances, and inadvertently

neglected the quarterly list.b.The Auxiliary Feedwater Actuation Logic monthly surveillance

test required by Unit 2 Technical Specification

Table 0.3-2 exceeded the 25%extension time due to a cognitive personnel error.Instrumentation

and Control Department

personnel erroneously

applied a date to the Plant cwork Order (PNO)for completion

that was in excess of the 2596 extension.

c.The Fixed Incore Alarm System monthly setpoint calculation

and adjustment

required by Unit 2 Technical Specification 0.2.1.0 exceeded the 25'Yo extension time due to a non-licensed

utility personnel error.The personnel error was an oversight in reading the surveillance

schedule.d.The Engineered

Safety Features Actuation System (ESFAS)relay semi-annual surveillance

test required by Unit 2 Technical Specifications

Table 0.3-2 exceeded the 259o extension time due to an oversight in including this surveillance

in the semi-annual

check sheet.3.The corrective

steps taken were to perform the required surveillances.

Those personnel involved were counseled on the necessity to perform surveillances

during the required interval.Those procedures

involved were revised as necessary.

L3:1

L-86-225 Re: St.Lucie Unit I and 2 Docket Hos.50-335 and 50-389 Ins ection Re ort 86-07 and 86-06 Page 3 0.The corrective

steps which will or have been taken to avoid further violations

were: a.Quality Control performed a review of their log to identify any problem areas, especially

Unit 2, and generated procedure changes to enhance the schedule of surveillances.

b.FPL considers this item complete, however, based on St.Lucie's past performance, we have reviewed the surveillance

program and found that the following programatic

changes are necessary to ensure continued high performance:

l.Each Department

will have their own scheduling

procedure.

2.An individual

will be assigned in each department

to oversee the surveillance

completion.

5.Full compliance

for item 3 was achieved on April 8, 1986.Item Oa above was completed on May 9, 1986.Item Ob is expected to be completed on August 15, 1986.L3:1