ML14304A783: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:LICENSEE:
{{#Wiki_filter:LICENSEE:       Exelon Generation Company, LLC FACILITY:       Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1
Exelon Generation Company, LLC FACILITY:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
PUBLIC MEETING WITH THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 2004-02 (TAC NO. MC4724) On October 30, 2014, a Category 1 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
PUBLIC MEETING WITH THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 2004-02 (TAC NO. MC4724)
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss planned testing for Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, "Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors," associated with Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1 ). The meeting notice and agenda, dated October 1, 2014, is available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No. ML14301A322.
On October 30, 2014, a Category 1 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss planned testing for Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, "Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors," associated with Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1 ). The meeting notice and agenda, dated October 1, 2014, is available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No.
The meeting began at 9:00a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) with opening remarks by the NRC staff followed by introductions of the attendees.
ML14301A322.
A list of attendees is provided in Enclosure
The meeting began at 9:00a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) with opening remarks by the NRC staff followed by introductions of the attendees. A list of attendees is provided in Enclosure 1.
: 1. Exelon presented information (See Enclosure 2 or ADAMS Accession No. ML14300A545).
Exelon presented information (See Enclosure 2 or ADAMS Accession No. ML14300A545).
Exelon selected Option 2a to close-out GL 2004-02 for TMI-1. Option 2 is the "mitigative measures and alternative methods;" Option 2a is the "deterministic resolution path." By letter dated May 16, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13137A309), TMI-1 stated it would complete modifications and pursue refinements to evaluation methods and acceptance criteria.
Exelon selected Option 2a to close-out GL 2004-02 for TMI-1. Option 2 is the "mitigative measures and alternative methods;" Option 2a is the "deterministic resolution path." By letter dated May 16, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13137A309), TMI-1 stated it would complete modifications and pursue refinements to evaluation methods and acceptance criteria. TMI-1 committed to:
TMI-1 committed to:
* Replace the NUKON currently installed on the pressurizer with Metallic Reflective Insulation (MRI) in the fall 2015 refueling outage (RFO).
* Replace the NUKON currently installed on the pressurizer with Metallic Reflective Insulation (MRI) in the fall 2015 refueling outage (RFO).
* Complete strainer head loss testing based on the reduced strainer debris load by December 31, 2015.
* Complete strainer head loss testing based on the reduced strainer debris load by December 31, 2015.
* Re-evaluate strainer bypass by July 31, 2016.
* Re-evaluate strainer bypass by July 31, 2016.
* Submit a final updated supplemental response to support closure of GL 2004-02 for TMI-1 by June 1, 2017. The current Exelon plan/schedule for TMI-1 is to:
* Submit a final updated supplemental response to support closure of GL 2004-02 for TMI-1 by June 1, 2017.
 
The current Exelon plan/schedule for TMI-1 is to:
* Conduct strainer head loss and bypass testing at Alden Research Laboratory (Holden, MA) in 2014.
* Conduct strainer head loss and bypass testing at Alden Research Laboratory (Holden, MA) in 2014.
* Based on strainer head loss test results, replace NUKON blanket insulation on the pressurizer with MRI during the fall 2015 RFO.
* Based on strainer head loss test results, replace NUKON blanket insulation on the pressurizer with MRI during the fall 2015 RFO.
* Submit final updated supplemental response to the NRC in 2016 pending completion of the Pressurized-Water Reactor Owners' Group efforts. Exelon proposed the following strainer test sequence:
* Submit final updated supplemental response to the NRC in 2016 pending completion of the Pressurized-Water Reactor Owners' Group efforts.
(1) single top hat bypass test in November 2014, (2) strainer head loss testing in December 2014, and (3) strainer bypass test in December 2014. The single top hat bypass test will evaluate the effect of debris concentration/mixture and water chemistry on the strainer bypass. The results of this "sensitivity" test will be factored into a large scale bypass test. The strainer head loss test sequence will consist of a thin bed test followed by one or two full load head loss tests, as required, to determine the limiting debris quantity.
Exelon proposed the following strainer test sequence: (1) single top hat bypass test in November 2014, (2) strainer head loss testing in December 2014, and (3) strainer bypass test in December 2014.
A test plan has been developed to evaluate several options for insulation replacement on the pressurizer.
The single top hat bypass test will evaluate the effect of debris concentration/mixture and water chemistry on the strainer bypass. The results of this "sensitivity" test will be factored into a large scale bypass test.
The final decision for the scope of the insulation replacement during the fall 2015 RFO will be determined by the test results. The information gained in the single top hat bypass test will be used to develop the test plan/procedures for the final strainer bypass test. The TMI-1 pressurizer is currently insulated entirely with NUKON blanket insulation.
The strainer head loss test sequence will consist of a thin bed test followed by one or two full load head loss tests, as required, to determine the limiting debris quantity. A test plan has been developed to evaluate several options for insulation replacement on the pressurizer. The final decision for the scope of the insulation replacement during the fall 2015 RFO will be determined by the test results.
Exelon is investigating two options for replacing NUKON with MRI:
The information gained in the single top hat bypass test will be used to develop the test plan/procedures for the final strainer bypass test.
The TMI-1 pressurizer is currently insulated entirely with NUKON blanket insulation. Exelon is investigating two options for replacing NUKON with MRI:
* Option A: replace NUKON insulation above the support region with the exception of the upper head, and
* Option A: replace NUKON insulation above the support region with the exception of the upper head, and
* Option 8: replace NUKON insulation in all locations with the exception of the upper head and inside the support. Exelon will use the head loss test sequence results to determine which option will result in acceptable net positive suction head for the emergency core cooling system pumps and acceptable maximum strainer differential pressure.
* Option 8: replace NUKON insulation in all locations with the exception of the upper head and inside the support.
Exelon will use the head loss test sequence results to determine which option will result in acceptable net positive suction head for the emergency core cooling system pumps and acceptable maximum strainer differential pressure.
Exelon has estimated the debris reduction for TMI-1:
Exelon has estimated the debris reduction for TMI-1:
* Option A results in approximately 46-percent reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer,
* Option A results in approximately 46-percent reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer,
* Option B results in approximately 81-percent reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer, and
* Option B results in approximately 81-percent reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer, and
* If necessary, a further reduction in the volume of fiber debris at the strainer can be achieved by removing the insulation currently included in Option B as "margin" and crediting the pressurizer support as a robust barrier (Option C). TMI-1 is continuing to follow the PWROG efforts to establish the allowable debris limits for vessel effects. The Exelon current calculated TMI-1 bypass of 34 grams fiber per fuel assembly is based on bypass testing that was performed for another utility with an Enercon top hat strainer similar to TMI-1. Exelon expects that the TMI-1 specific bypass test will provide a lower bypass fraction.
* If necessary, a further reduction in the volume of fiber debris at the strainer can be achieved by removing the insulation currently included in Option B as "margin" and crediting the pressurizer support as a robust barrier (Option C).
Exelon has proposed debris preparation protocol for head loss and final bypass tests to include the following:
TMI-1 is continuing to follow the PWROG efforts to establish the allowable debris limits for in-vessel effects.
fine debris added to the tank first, insulation torn into 1 "-4" pieces by hand, torn insulation to be wetted using garden hose nozzle, wetted debris will be mixed using a paddle to ensure even moisture penetration, additional water spray applied to ensure small pieces are separated from each other, and preparation ends when it has been confirmed that the pieces readily separate within the slurry and no pieces remain floating.
The Exelon current calculated TMI-1 bypass of 34 grams fiber per fuel assembly is based on bypass testing that was performed for another utility with an Enercon top hat strainer similar to TMI-1.
The NRC staff queried the licensee and vendor about the strainer test, questioning if it will include multiple top hats and chemical effects. Exelon and Enercon responded that the strainer test would include 9 top hats in a 3 by 3 array and it would include chemical effects. The NRC staff questioned if insulation had been changed at TMI-1. Exelon stated that during the steam generator (SG) replacement in 2007, that NUKON insulation was replaced with MRI on the SGs and some hot leg piping NUKON insulation was replaced with MRI. The NRC staff queried Exelon regarding if velocity sensitivity was going to be performed for the testing. Exelon responded that velocity sensitivity would not be performed.
Exelon expects that the TMI-1 specific bypass test will provide a lower bypass fraction.
The NRC staff questioned what temperature and range would the testing be performed.
Exelon has proposed debris preparation protocol for head loss and final bypass tests to include the following: fine debris added to the tank first, insulation torn into 1"-4" pieces by hand, torn insulation to be wetted using garden hose nozzle, wetted debris will be mixed using a paddle to ensure even moisture penetration, additional water spray applied to ensure small pieces are separated from each other, and preparation ends when it has been confirmed that the pieces readily separate within the slurry and no pieces remain floating.
Exelon responded that the testing would be performed at 120 degrees Fahrenheit CF) with a range of plus or minus 5°F. The NRC queried whether the testing included bypass eliminators, and Exelon responded that it does. The NRC questioned Exelon and Enercon if the fines are made according to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) protocol, and the licensee responded yes. The NRC staff queried Exelon and Enercon if settling would be allowed during the testing, and Enercon responded that settling would not be allowed. The NRC staff asked Exelon to provide the exact dates for the testing, so the NRC staff could witness the testing, if desired. The NRC staff stated that they would look at the guidance for making small debris for the testing. No members of the public were in attendance.
The NRC staff queried the licensee and vendor about the strainer test, questioning if it will include multiple top hats and chemical effects. Exelon and Enercon responded that the strainer test would include 9 top hats in a 3 by 3 array and it would include chemical effects. The NRC staff questioned if insulation had been changed at TMI-1. Exelon stated that during the steam generator (SG) replacement in 2007, that NUKON insulation was replaced with MRI on the SGs and some hot leg piping NUKON insulation was replaced with MRI. The NRC staff queried Exelon regarding if velocity sensitivity was going to be performed for the testing. Exelon responded that velocity sensitivity would not be performed. The NRC staff questioned what temperature and range would the testing be performed. Exelon responded that the testing would be performed at 120 degrees Fahrenheit CF) with a range of plus or minus 5°F. The NRC queried whether the testing included bypass eliminators, and Exelon responded that it does. The NRC questioned Exelon and Enercon if the fines are made according to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) protocol, and the licensee responded yes. The NRC staff queried Exelon and Enercon if settling would be allowed during the testing, and Enercon responded that settling would not be allowed. The NRC staff asked Exelon to provide the exact dates for the testing, so the NRC staff could witness the testing, if desired. The NRC staff stated that they would look at the guidance for making small debris for the testing.
Public Meeting Feedback forms were not received.
No members of the public were in attendance. Public Meeting Feedback forms were not received.
At this meeting, the NRC staff made no regulatory decisions regarding the merits of the proposed close-out of GL 2004-02 at TMI-1. The meeting was adjourned at 9:54a.m. EDT. Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-3100, Docket No.: 50-289  
At this meeting, the NRC staff made no regulatory decisions regarding the merits of the proposed close-out of GL 2004-02 at TMI-1.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:54a.m. EDT.
 
Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-3100,
                                                    . Lamb, Senior Project Manager nt Licensing Branch 1-2 Di is"on of Operating Reactor Licensing Of
* e of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No.: 50-289


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. List of Meeting Attendees
: 2. Exelon Presentation Slides cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv
LIST OF ATTENDEES PUBLIC MEETING BETWEEN EXELON GENERATION COMPANY LLC (EXELON) AND THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) STAFF THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2014 9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.
ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROOM 0-8B6 NAME                          ORGANIZATION John Stang                              NRC Paul Klein                            NRC Steve Smith                            NRC John Lamb                              NRC Matt Yoder                              NRC Andrea Russell                            NRC Ashley Guzzetta                          NRC Robert Gladney                            NRC Dave Werkheiser                            NRC Frank Mascitelli                        Exelon Dave Reese                            Exelon Richard Sievers                          Exelon Pat Bennett                            Exelon Mike Fitzwater                          Exelon Caitlin Keane                          Exelon Kip Walker                          Enercon Tim Sande                            Enercon Ludwig Haber                          Alden Lab Enclosure 1
G)
    -f    r-
::1:  1\)
:::c  0 m      o
~ m      ~
s: 6 z--csl\l
-1 r-  ~
-""m      0
    -      r-
    ~      0
    )>    en z      m c      0 c:
          -1


1 . List of Meeting Attendees
GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Purpose of Meeting:
: 2. Exelon Presentation Slides cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv . Lamb, Senior Project Manager nt Licensing Branch 1-2 Di is"on of Operating Reactor Licensing Of
* e of Nuclear Reactor Regulation LIST OF ATTENDEES PUBLIC MEETING BETWEEN EXELON GENERATION COMPANY LLC (EXELON) AND THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) STAFF THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2014 9:00 a.m. -11:00 a.m. ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROOM 0-8B6 NAME ORGANIZATION John Stang NRC Paul Klein NRC Steve Smith NRC John Lamb NRC Matt Yoder NRC Andrea Russell NRC Ashley Guzzetta NRC Robert Gladney NRC Dave Werkheiser NRC Frank Mascitelli Exelon Dave Reese Exelon Richard Sievers Exelon Pat Bennett Exelon Mike Fitzwater Exelon Caitlin Keane Exelon Kip Walker Enercon Tim Sande Enercon Ludwig Haber Alden Lab Enclosure 1
Enclosure 2
G) -f ::1: 1\) :::c 0 m o m z s: 6 --csl\l -1 r--""m 0 -r-0 )> en z m c 0 c: -1 GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Purpose of Meeting:
* Communicate current TMI plan for closure of GL 2004-02.
* Communicate current TMI plan for closure of GL 2004-02.
* Provide updated schedule of activities related to closure of GL 2004-02 for TMI.
* Provide updated schedule of activities related to closure of GL 2004-02 for TMI.
* Identify any areas of concern that can be addressed during the TMI strainer testing program.
* Identify any areas of concern that can be addressed during the TMI strainer testing program.
* Identify areas where additional discussion/review may be required to ensure successful closure of GL 2004-02 for Three Mile Island Unit 1. 2 £!!!' Exelon GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI In July, 2012, NRC provided three options for closure of GSI-191*: Option 1: Compliance based on approved models o Plants must meet "clean plant criteria" or o Have sufficiently low strainer bypass and o Meet the 15 gram per fuel assembly limit Option 2: Mitigative measures and alternative methods 2a -Deterministic Resolution Path 2b -Full Risk-Informed Resolution Path Option 3: Different regulatory treatments for strainer and in-vessel effects o Use deterministic approach for strainer and a risk-informed approach to in-vessel.
* Identify areas where additional discussion/review may be required to ensure successful closure of GL 2004-02 for Three Mile Island Unit 1.
only conceptually defined in 2012 and is still under development.  
2                                                   £!!!' Exelon
; SECY-12-0093 GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI TMI selected Option 2a -complete additional modifications and pursue refinements to evaluation methods and acceptance criteria.*
 
{TMI previously applied a 70 ZOI for Nukon insulation.
GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI In July, 2012, NRC provided three options for closure of GSI-191*:
The updated analyses and testing will apply the 170 ZOI.} TMI committed to:
Option 1: Compliance based on approved models o Plants must meet "clean plant criteria" or o Have sufficiently low strainer bypass and o Meet the 15 gram per fuel assembly limit Option 2: Mitigative measures and alternative methods 2a - Deterministic Resolution Path 2b - Full Risk-Informed Resolution Path Option 3: Different regulatory treatments for strainer and in-vessel effects o Use deterministic approach for strainer and a risk-informed approach to in-vessel.
olhis~option  only conceptually defined in 2012 and is still under development.
; SECY-12-0093                                                               =~Exelon
 
GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI TMI selected Option 2a - complete additional modifications and pursue refinements to evaluation methods and acceptance criteria.*
{TMI previously applied a 70 ZOI for Nukon insulation. The updated analyses and testing will apply the 170 ZOI.}
TMI committed to:
* Replace the NUKON insulation currently installed on the pressurizer with Metallic Reflective Insulation (MRI) in T1 R21 (Fall 2015).
* Replace the NUKON insulation currently installed on the pressurizer with Metallic Reflective Insulation (MRI) in T1 R21 (Fall 2015).
* Complete strainer head loss testing based on the reduced strainer debris load by 12/31/15
* Complete strainer head loss testing based on the reduced strainer debris load by 12/31/15
* Re-evaluate strainer bypass by 7/31/16
* Re-evaluate strainer bypass by 7/31/16
* Submit a final updated supplemental response to support closure of GL 2004-02 for TMI Unit 1 by 6/1/17. *TMI Letter (TMI-12-148) to USNRC dated May 16, 2013. 4 GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Current TMI plan/schedule:
* Submit a final updated supplemental response to support closure of GL 2004-02 for TMI Unit 1 by 6/1/17.
*TMI Letter (TMI-12-148) to USNRC dated May 16, 2013.
4                                                                     ~Exelon
 
GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Current TMI plan/schedule:
* Conduct strainer head loss and bypass testing @ Alden Research Laboratory (Holden, MA) in 2014
* Conduct strainer head loss and bypass testing @ Alden Research Laboratory (Holden, MA) in 2014
* Based on strainer head loss test results, replace Nukon blanket insulation on the pressurizer with MRI in fall 2015 refueling outage (T1 R21 ).
* Based on strainer head loss test results, replace Nukon blanket insulation on the pressurizer with MRI in fall 2015 refueling outage (T1 R21 ).
* Submit final updated supplemental response to the NRC in 2016 pending completion of the PWROG efforts. 5 :Exelon GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Strainer test sequence:
* Submit final updated supplemental response to the NRC in 2016 pending completion of the PWROG efforts.
Single Top Hat Bypass Test-November 2014 This testwill evaluate the effect of debris concentration/mixture and water chemistry on strainer bypass. The results of this 'sensitivity' test will be factored into a large scale bypass test. Strainer Head Loss Testing-December 2014 This test sequence will consist of a thin bed test followed by one or two full load head loss tests as required to determine the limiting debris quantity.
5                                                       :Exelon
A test plan has been developed to evaluate several options for insulation replacement on the pressurizer.
 
The final decision for the scope of insulation replacement in T1 R21 will be determined by the test results. Strainer Bypass Test-December 2014 The information gained in the single top hat bypass test will be used to develop the test plan/procedures for the final bypass test. Test plans and procedures are currently being developed.
GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Strainer test sequence:
6 1 & ¥J GL 2004-02 Close Out for .......------
Single Top Hat Bypass Test- November 2014 This testwill evaluate the effect of debris concentration/mixture and water chemistry on strainer bypass. The results of this 'sensitivity' test will be factored into a large scale bypass test.
---- Nt:> LA<\GINC ON -mP' At;J't;D -*-*  
Strainer Head Loss Testing- December 2014 This test sequence will consist of a thin bed test followed by one or two full load head loss tests as required to determine the limiting debris quantity. A test plan has been developed to evaluate several options for insulation replacement on the pressurizer. The final decision for the scope of insulation replacement in T1 R21 will be determined by the test results.
'' t.:l \ r:-. ':..-*-_
Strainer Bypass Test- December 2014 The information gained in the single top hat bypass test will be used to develop the test plan/procedures for the final bypass test.
:::0 'l " ' ...__ __ _ ------(&sect;)
Test plans and procedures are currently being developed.
7 TMI TMI pressurizer is currently insulated entirely with Nukon blanket insulation.
6                                                                                 =~Exelon
 
1
                                                          &                         &#xa5;J GL 2004-02 Close Out for
                    .......------                                   ----
Nt:> LA<\GINC ON -mP' At;J't;D -*-
* TMI M:~GJ,~.$ "'~~~
TMI pressurizer is currently insulated entirely with Nukon blanket insulation.
        ~~~~!..Vi~.,.,.:.":""';'~
Two options for replacing Nukon with MRI will be investigated:
Two options for replacing Nukon with MRI will be investigated:
Option A: replace Nukon insulation above the support region with the exception of the upper head. Option B: replace Nukon insulation in all locations except upper head and inside the support. The head loss test sequence will determine which option will result in acceptable NPSH for the ECCS pumps and acceptable maximum strainer DP. =--:-Exelon GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI 8 Estimated debris reduction:
Option A: replace Nukon insulation above the support region with the exception of the upper head.
Option B: replace Nukon insulation in all locations except upper head and inside the support.
The head loss test sequence will determine which option will result in acceptable NPSH for the ECCS pumps
                                    \    r:-.    ''
                                                +~ ~-    t.:l    ~  ~--<(.jp+ :::0 and acceptable maximum strainer DP.
                                                      ':..-*-  _
                                      'l      "              '
                    ...__ __ _                                      ------(&sect;)
7                                                                                                                        =--:- Exelon
 
GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Estimated debris reduction:
* Option A results in approximately 46&deg;/o reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer
* Option A results in approximately 46&deg;/o reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer
* Option B results in approximately 81 o/o reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer
* Option B results in approximately 81 o/o reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer
* If necessary, a further reduction in the volume of fiber debris at the strainer can be achieved by removing the insulation currently included in Option B as 'margin' and crediting the pressurizer support as a robust barrier (Option C). {Following insulation replacement on the pressurizer, some small amounts of blanket insulation will remain on piping and components within the ZOI.} S"Exelon GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI TMI is continuing to follow PWROG efforts to establish the allowable debris limits for in-vessel effects. The current calculated TMI bypass of 34 grams fiber/fuel assembly is based on bypass testing that was performed for another utility with an Enercon top hat strainer similar to TMI's. The TM I specific bypass test is expected to provide a lower bypass fraction.  
* If necessary, a further reduction in the volume of fiber debris at the strainer can be achieved by removing the insulation currently included in Option B as 'margin' and crediting the pressurizer support as a robust barrier (Option C).
' < 9 GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Proposed Debris Preparation Protocol for Head Loss and Final Bypass Tests*
{Following insulation replacement on the pressurizer, some small amounts of blanket insulation will remain on piping and components within the ZOI.}
* Debris categorized as small or large pieces and intact blankets will be prepared as follows: -Insulation torn into 1 "-4" pieces by hand -Torn insulation will be wetted using garden hose nozzle -Wetted debris will be mixed using a paddle to ensure even moisture penetration  
8                                                                          S"Exelon
-Additional water spray applied to ensure small pieces are separated from each other -Preparation ends when it has been confirmed that the pieces readily separate within the slurry and no pieces remain floating
 
* Fine debris will be added to the tank first *Fiber will be prepared only as 'fines' for the single top hat bypass test. 10 :Exelon   Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-3100, or John.Lamb@nrc.gov.
GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI TMI is continuing to follow PWROG efforts to establish the allowable debris limits for in-vessel effects.
Docket No.: 50-289  
The current calculated TMI bypass of 34 grams fiber/fuel assembly is based on bypass testing that was performed for another utility with an Enercon top hat strainer similar to TMI's.
The TM I specific bypass test is expected to provide a lower bypass fraction.
      ' ~-h- -~~ < ~
9                                                           =~Exelon
 
GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Proposed Debris Preparation Protocol for Head Loss and Final Bypass Tests*
* Debris categorized as small or large pieces and intact blankets will be prepared as follows:
      - Insulation torn into 1"-4" pieces by hand
      - Torn insulation will be wetted using garden hose nozzle
      - Wetted debris will be mixed using a paddle to ensure even moisture penetration
      - Additional water spray applied to ensure small pieces are separated from each other
      - Preparation ends when it has been confirmed that the pieces readily separate within the slurry and no pieces remain floating
* Fine debris will be added to the tank first
      *Fiber will be prepared only as 'fines' for the single top hat bypass test.
10                                                                               :Exelon
 
Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-3100, or John.Lamb@nrc.gov.
IRA/
John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No.: 50-289


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. List of Meeting Attendees
: 1. List of Meeting Attendees
: 2. Exelon Presentation Slides cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
: 2. Exelon Presentation Slides cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
Public RidsNrrDoriLpi1-2Resource JStang, NRR PKiein, NRR SSmith, NRR IRA/ John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation MYoder, NRR RidsOpaMail Resource DWerkheiser, R-1 SKennedy, R-1 MDudek, EDO RidsNrrThreeMilelsland RidsNrrLAABaxter
Public                                 MYoder, NRR                MDudek, EDO RidsNrrDoriLpi1-2Resource             RidsOpaMail Resource        RidsNrrThreeMilelsland JStang, NRR                           DWerkheiser, R-1           RidsNrrLAABaxter PKiein, NRR                            SKennedy, R-1               RidsAcrsAcnw_MaiiCTR SSmith, NRR ADAMS Accession No.:       Package: ML14304A784, Summary: ML14304A783, Slides: ML14300A545 OFFICE LPL 1-2/PM         LPL 1-2/LA         LPL 1-2/BC             LPL 1-2/PM NAME       JLamb           A Baxter           MKhanna                 JLamb DATE       10/30/14       11/10/14             11/12/14               11/14/14
 
                                  ..
RidsAcrsAcnw_MaiiCTR ADAMS Accession No.: Package: ML14304A784, Summary: ML14304A783, Slides: ML14300A545 OFFICE LPL 1-2/PM LPL 1-2/LA LPL 1-2/BC LPL 1-2/PM NAME JLamb A Baxter MKhanna JLamb DATE 10/30/14 11/10/14 11/12/14 11/14/14 .. Off1c1al Agency Record}}
Off1c1al Agency Record}}

Revision as of 19:55, 31 October 2019

Public Meeting with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Wate
ML14304A783
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/14/2014
From: John Lamb
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To:
Exelon Generation Co
John Lamb, NRR/DORL 415-3100
References
GL-04-002, TAC MC4724
Download: ML14304A783 (17)
v • d • e


Text

LICENSEE: Exelon Generation Company, LLC FACILITY: Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1

SUBJECT:

PUBLIC MEETING WITH THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 2004-02 (TAC NO. MC4724)

On October 30, 2014, a Category 1 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss planned testing for Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, "Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors," associated with Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1 ). The meeting notice and agenda, dated October 1, 2014, is available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No.

ML14301A322.

The meeting began at 9:00a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) with opening remarks by the NRC staff followed by introductions of the attendees. A list of attendees is provided in Enclosure 1.

Exelon presented information (See Enclosure 2 or ADAMS Accession No. ML14300A545).

Exelon selected Option 2a to close-out GL 2004-02 for TMI-1. Option 2 is the "mitigative measures and alternative methods;" Option 2a is the "deterministic resolution path." By letter dated May 16, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13137A309), TMI-1 stated it would complete modifications and pursue refinements to evaluation methods and acceptance criteria. TMI-1 committed to:

  • Replace the NUKON currently installed on the pressurizer with Metallic Reflective Insulation (MRI) in the fall 2015 refueling outage (RFO).
  • Complete strainer head loss testing based on the reduced strainer debris load by December 31, 2015.
  • Re-evaluate strainer bypass by July 31, 2016.
  • Submit a final updated supplemental response to support closure of GL 2004-02 for TMI-1 by June 1, 2017.

The current Exelon plan/schedule for TMI-1 is to:

  • Conduct strainer head loss and bypass testing at Alden Research Laboratory (Holden, MA) in 2014.
  • Based on strainer head loss test results, replace NUKON blanket insulation on the pressurizer with MRI during the fall 2015 RFO.
  • Submit final updated supplemental response to the NRC in 2016 pending completion of the Pressurized-Water Reactor Owners' Group efforts.

Exelon proposed the following strainer test sequence: (1) single top hat bypass test in November 2014, (2) strainer head loss testing in December 2014, and (3) strainer bypass test in December 2014.

The single top hat bypass test will evaluate the effect of debris concentration/mixture and water chemistry on the strainer bypass. The results of this "sensitivity" test will be factored into a large scale bypass test.

The strainer head loss test sequence will consist of a thin bed test followed by one or two full load head loss tests, as required, to determine the limiting debris quantity. A test plan has been developed to evaluate several options for insulation replacement on the pressurizer. The final decision for the scope of the insulation replacement during the fall 2015 RFO will be determined by the test results.

The information gained in the single top hat bypass test will be used to develop the test plan/procedures for the final strainer bypass test.

The TMI-1 pressurizer is currently insulated entirely with NUKON blanket insulation. Exelon is investigating two options for replacing NUKON with MRI:

  • Option A: replace NUKON insulation above the support region with the exception of the upper head, and
  • Option 8: replace NUKON insulation in all locations with the exception of the upper head and inside the support.

Exelon will use the head loss test sequence results to determine which option will result in acceptable net positive suction head for the emergency core cooling system pumps and acceptable maximum strainer differential pressure.

Exelon has estimated the debris reduction for TMI-1:

  • Option A results in approximately 46-percent reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer,
  • Option B results in approximately 81-percent reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer, and
  • If necessary, a further reduction in the volume of fiber debris at the strainer can be achieved by removing the insulation currently included in Option B as "margin" and crediting the pressurizer support as a robust barrier (Option C).

TMI-1 is continuing to follow the PWROG efforts to establish the allowable debris limits for in-vessel effects.

The Exelon current calculated TMI-1 bypass of 34 grams fiber per fuel assembly is based on bypass testing that was performed for another utility with an Enercon top hat strainer similar to TMI-1.

Exelon expects that the TMI-1 specific bypass test will provide a lower bypass fraction.

Exelon has proposed debris preparation protocol for head loss and final bypass tests to include the following: fine debris added to the tank first, insulation torn into 1"-4" pieces by hand, torn insulation to be wetted using garden hose nozzle, wetted debris will be mixed using a paddle to ensure even moisture penetration, additional water spray applied to ensure small pieces are separated from each other, and preparation ends when it has been confirmed that the pieces readily separate within the slurry and no pieces remain floating.

The NRC staff queried the licensee and vendor about the strainer test, questioning if it will include multiple top hats and chemical effects. Exelon and Enercon responded that the strainer test would include 9 top hats in a 3 by 3 array and it would include chemical effects. The NRC staff questioned if insulation had been changed at TMI-1. Exelon stated that during the steam generator (SG) replacement in 2007, that NUKON insulation was replaced with MRI on the SGs and some hot leg piping NUKON insulation was replaced with MRI. The NRC staff queried Exelon regarding if velocity sensitivity was going to be performed for the testing. Exelon responded that velocity sensitivity would not be performed. The NRC staff questioned what temperature and range would the testing be performed. Exelon responded that the testing would be performed at 120 degrees Fahrenheit CF) with a range of plus or minus 5°F. The NRC queried whether the testing included bypass eliminators, and Exelon responded that it does. The NRC questioned Exelon and Enercon if the fines are made according to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) protocol, and the licensee responded yes. The NRC staff queried Exelon and Enercon if settling would be allowed during the testing, and Enercon responded that settling would not be allowed. The NRC staff asked Exelon to provide the exact dates for the testing, so the NRC staff could witness the testing, if desired. The NRC staff stated that they would look at the guidance for making small debris for the testing.

No members of the public were in attendance. Public Meeting Feedback forms were not received.

At this meeting, the NRC staff made no regulatory decisions regarding the merits of the proposed close-out of GL 2004-02 at TMI-1.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:54a.m. EDT.

Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-3100,

. Lamb, Senior Project Manager nt Licensing Branch 1-2 Di is"on of Operating Reactor Licensing Of

  • e of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No.: 50-289

Enclosures:

1. List of Meeting Attendees
2. Exelon Presentation Slides cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv

LIST OF ATTENDEES PUBLIC MEETING BETWEEN EXELON GENERATION COMPANY LLC (EXELON) AND THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) STAFF THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2014 9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.

ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROOM 0-8B6 NAME ORGANIZATION John Stang NRC Paul Klein NRC Steve Smith NRC John Lamb NRC Matt Yoder NRC Andrea Russell NRC Ashley Guzzetta NRC Robert Gladney NRC Dave Werkheiser NRC Frank Mascitelli Exelon Dave Reese Exelon Richard Sievers Exelon Pat Bennett Exelon Mike Fitzwater Exelon Caitlin Keane Exelon Kip Walker Enercon Tim Sande Enercon Ludwig Haber Alden Lab Enclosure 1

G)

-f r-

1: 1\)
c 0 m o

~ m ~

s: 6 z--csl\l

-1 r- ~

-""m 0

- r-

~ 0

)> en z m c 0 c:

-1

GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Purpose of Meeting:

  • Provide updated schedule of activities related to closure of GL 2004-02 for TMI.
  • Identify any areas of concern that can be addressed during the TMI strainer testing program.
  • Identify areas where additional discussion/review may be required to ensure successful closure of GL 2004-02 for Three Mile Island Unit 1.

2 £!!!' Exelon

GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI In July, 2012, NRC provided three options for closure of GSI-191*:

Option 1: Compliance based on approved models o Plants must meet "clean plant criteria" or o Have sufficiently low strainer bypass and o Meet the 15 gram per fuel assembly limit Option 2: Mitigative measures and alternative methods 2a - Deterministic Resolution Path 2b - Full Risk-Informed Resolution Path Option 3: Different regulatory treatments for strainer and in-vessel effects o Use deterministic approach for strainer and a risk-informed approach to in-vessel.

olhis~option only conceptually defined in 2012 and is still under development.

SECY-12-0093 =~Exelon

GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI TMI selected Option 2a - complete additional modifications and pursue refinements to evaluation methods and acceptance criteria.*

{TMI previously applied a 70 ZOI for Nukon insulation. The updated analyses and testing will apply the 170 ZOI.}

TMI committed to:

  • Replace the NUKON insulation currently installed on the pressurizer with Metallic Reflective Insulation (MRI) in T1 R21 (Fall 2015).
  • Complete strainer head loss testing based on the reduced strainer debris load by 12/31/15
  • Re-evaluate strainer bypass by 7/31/16
  • Submit a final updated supplemental response to support closure of GL 2004-02 for TMI Unit 1 by 6/1/17.
  • TMI Letter (TMI-12-148) to USNRC dated May 16, 2013.

4 ~Exelon

GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Current TMI plan/schedule:

  • Conduct strainer head loss and bypass testing @ Alden Research Laboratory (Holden, MA) in 2014
  • Based on strainer head loss test results, replace Nukon blanket insulation on the pressurizer with MRI in fall 2015 refueling outage (T1 R21 ).
  • Submit final updated supplemental response to the NRC in 2016 pending completion of the PWROG efforts.

5 :Exelon

GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Strainer test sequence:

Single Top Hat Bypass Test- November 2014 This testwill evaluate the effect of debris concentration/mixture and water chemistry on strainer bypass. The results of this 'sensitivity' test will be factored into a large scale bypass test.

Strainer Head Loss Testing- December 2014 This test sequence will consist of a thin bed test followed by one or two full load head loss tests as required to determine the limiting debris quantity. A test plan has been developed to evaluate several options for insulation replacement on the pressurizer. The final decision for the scope of insulation replacement in T1 R21 will be determined by the test results.

Strainer Bypass Test- December 2014 The information gained in the single top hat bypass test will be used to develop the test plan/procedures for the final bypass test.

Test plans and procedures are currently being developed.

6 =~Exelon

1

& ¥J GL 2004-02 Close Out for

.......------ ----

Nt:> LA<\GINC ON -mP' At;J't;D -*-

  • TMI M:~GJ,~.$ "'~~~

TMI pressurizer is currently insulated entirely with Nukon blanket insulation.

~~~~!..Vi~.,.,.:.":""';'~

Two options for replacing Nukon with MRI will be investigated:

Option A: replace Nukon insulation above the support region with the exception of the upper head.

Option B: replace Nukon insulation in all locations except upper head and inside the support.

The head loss test sequence will determine which option will result in acceptable NPSH for the ECCS pumps

\ r:-.

+~ ~- t.:l ~ ~--<(.jp+ :::0 and acceptable maximum strainer DP.

':..-*- _

'l " '

...__ __ _ ------(§)

7 =--:- Exelon

GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Estimated debris reduction:

  • Option A results in approximately 46°/o reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer
  • Option B results in approximately 81 o/o reduction in the volume of blanket insulation on the pressurizer
  • If necessary, a further reduction in the volume of fiber debris at the strainer can be achieved by removing the insulation currently included in Option B as 'margin' and crediting the pressurizer support as a robust barrier (Option C).

{Following insulation replacement on the pressurizer, some small amounts of blanket insulation will remain on piping and components within the ZOI.}

8 S"Exelon

GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI TMI is continuing to follow PWROG efforts to establish the allowable debris limits for in-vessel effects.

The current calculated TMI bypass of 34 grams fiber/fuel assembly is based on bypass testing that was performed for another utility with an Enercon top hat strainer similar to TMI's.

The TM I specific bypass test is expected to provide a lower bypass fraction.

' ~-h- -~~ < ~

9 =~Exelon

GL 2004-02 Close Out for TMI Proposed Debris Preparation Protocol for Head Loss and Final Bypass Tests*

  • Debris categorized as small or large pieces and intact blankets will be prepared as follows:

- Insulation torn into 1"-4" pieces by hand

- Torn insulation will be wetted using garden hose nozzle

- Wetted debris will be mixed using a paddle to ensure even moisture penetration

- Additional water spray applied to ensure small pieces are separated from each other

- Preparation ends when it has been confirmed that the pieces readily separate within the slurry and no pieces remain floating

  • Fine debris will be added to the tank first
  • Fiber will be prepared only as 'fines' for the single top hat bypass test.

10 :Exelon

Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-3100, or John.Lamb@nrc.gov.

IRA/

John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No.: 50-289

Enclosures:

1. List of Meeting Attendees
2. Exelon Presentation Slides cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

Public MYoder, NRR MDudek, EDO RidsNrrDoriLpi1-2Resource RidsOpaMail Resource RidsNrrThreeMilelsland JStang, NRR DWerkheiser, R-1 RidsNrrLAABaxter PKiein, NRR SKennedy, R-1 RidsAcrsAcnw_MaiiCTR SSmith, NRR ADAMS Accession No.: Package: ML14304A784, Summary: ML14304A783, Slides: ML14300A545 OFFICE LPL 1-2/PM LPL 1-2/LA LPL 1-2/BC LPL 1-2/PM NAME JLamb A Baxter MKhanna JLamb DATE 10/30/14 11/10/14 11/12/14 11/14/14

..

Off1c1al Agency Record

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14304A783&oldid=2041268"