ML17324A123: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/04/1978
| issue date = 10/04/1978
| title = Responds to NRC 780919 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-333/78-16.Disputes Alleged Infraction & Requests Notice of Violation Be Withdrawn
| title = Responds to NRC 780919 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-333/78-16.Disputes Alleged Infraction & Requests Notice of Violation Be Withdrawn
| author name = LEONARD J D
| author name = Leonard J
| author affiliation = POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
| author affiliation = POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
| addressee name = GRIER B H
| addressee name = Grier B
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| docket = 05000333
| docket = 05000333
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000333/1978016]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I e sm~n POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JAMES A.FITZPATRICK
{{#Wiki_filter:Ie sm
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT JOHN D.LEONARD, JR.Resident Manager October, 4, 1978 JAFP-78-512 P.O.BOX 41 Lycoming, New York 13093 315 342.3840 Mr.Boyce H.Grier, Director United States Nuclear Regulatory
~n POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT P.O. BOX 41 JOHN D. LEONARD, JR.
Commission
Resident Manager                                                                   Lycoming, New York 13093 315 342.3840 October, 4, 1978 JAFP-78   512 Mr. Boyce H.       Grier, Director United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region     1 631   Park Avenue King of Prussia,         Pennsylvania   19406
Region 1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
 
19406 Reference:
==Reference:==
Docket f50-333 Dear Mr.Grier: IE Inspection
Docket f50-333             IE  Inspection f78-16
f78-16 With reference to the'inspection
 
conducted by Mr.K.Plumlee of your office on August 31 and September 1, 1978, at the James A.FitzPatrick
==Dear Mr.       Grier:==
Nuclear Power Plant, and in accordance
 
with the provisions
With reference to the 'inspection conducted by Mr. K. Plumlee of your office on August 31 and September 1, 1978, at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.201 of Part II of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations we are submitting oor reply to item A or ~Ap endix A or the Notice or Violation transmitted by your letter dated September 19, 1978 as received by the undersigned on September 22, 1978.
of Section 2.201 of Part II of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
APPENDIX A Notice of Violation Based on the       results of   an NRC inspection conducted   on August 31 and Septem-ber 1, 1978,       it appears that one of your activities   was not conducted in     full compliance with the conditions of your NRC Facility           License No. DPR-59 as indicated below. This item is an infraction.
we are submitting
A. Technical Specifications Section 6.11.A, which was effective July 28, 1978, requires that any individual or group of individuals permitted to enter high radiation areas be provided with or accompanied by one or more of the following:
oor reply to item A or~Ap endix A or the Notice or Violation transmitted
1,     A radiation monitoring device which continuously indicates the radia-tion dose rate in the area.
by your letter dated September 19, 1978 as received by the undersigned
: 2.     A radiation monitoring device which continuously integrates the radia-tion dose rate in the area and alarms when a preset integrated dose is received. Entry into such areas with this monitoring device may be made after the dose rate level in the area has been established and personnel have been made knowledgeable qf them.
on September 22, 1978.APPENDIX A Notice of Violation Based on the results of an NRC inspection
                                                                    '780%18o3'Ig
conducted on August 31 and Septem-ber 1, 1978, it appears that one of your activities
 
was not conducted in full compliance
Page 2 An  individual qualified in radiation protection procedures who is equipped with a radiation dose rate monitoring device. This indi-vidual shall   be responsible for providing positive control over the activities within   the area and shall perform periodic radiation sur-veillance at the frequency specified by the facility in the Radiation Work Permit.
with the conditions
Contrary to the above, up to September I  1978, unaccompanied individuals (operators and technicians) were routinely permitted to enter high radiation areas without being provided with a continuously indicating dose rate moni-toring device, or a continuously integrating radiation dose rate monitor that alarms when a preset integrated dose is received.
of your NRC Facility License No.DPR-59 as indicated below.This item is an infraction.
We have reviewed Inspection Report 50-333/78-16 and take issue       with the sec-the inspector   s finding that the alleged infraction exists. The specification clearly states "one or more of the following." We maintain that no vio-       'ited lation exists since the operators and technicians referred to in the Inspection Report were acting in compliance with Technical Specification 6.11(A) I.C.
A.Technical Specifications
(your item A.3 above) in that:
Section 6.11.A, which was effective July 28, 1978, requires that any individual
: 1)   The digital radiation meter in question is a radiation dose rate moni-toring device, therefore satisfies the requirement of having a "radia-tion dose rate monitoring device."
or group of individuals
: 2)   These instruments are used by individuals qualified in radiation pro-tection procedures.
permitted to enter high radiation areas be provided with or accompanied
: 3)   High radiation area entries made using these radiation dose rate moni-toring devices are, made in accordance with the plant radiation protection procedures   (Extended RWP).
by one or more of the following:
: 4)   Only those personnel   specifically qualified may use this   Extended RWP procedure. Individuals so trained are qualifed to exercise positive control over the activities within the area.
1, A radiation monitoring
The digital   meters are used because they are lightweight, compact, easy to oper-ate, accurate,   and have a wide range (lmR/hr to 999R/hr). The operators and technicians carry these meters with them while making routine plant "rounds."
device which continuously
RWPs used in connection with pe'rforming maintenance work in high radiation areas specify that continuous reading rate meters are to be used or a radiation pro-tection technician assigned to provide monitoring during the progress of the job.
indicates the radia-tion dose rate in the area.2.A radiation monitoring
We therefore contend that     we are not in violation of our Technical Specifications and respectfully request that the Notice of Violation be withdrawn.
device which continuously
Very truly yours,~
integrates
gggIi /Q<'I ~~~
the radia-tion dose rate in the area and alarms when a preset integrated
John D. Leonard, Jr.
dose is received.Entry into such areas with this monitoring
Resident Manager JDL:smr
device may be made after the dose rate level in the area has been established
 
and personnel have been made knowledgeable
qf them.'780%18o3'Ig  
Page 2An individual
qualified in radiation protection
procedures
who is equipped with a radiation dose rate monitoring
device.This indi-vidual shall be responsible
for providing positive control over the activities
within the area and shall perform periodic radiation sur-veillance at the frequency specified by the facility in the Radiation Work Permit.Contrary to the above, up to September I1978, unaccompanied
individuals (operators
and technicians)
were routinely permitted to enter high radiation areas without being provided with a continuously
indicating
dose rate moni-toring device, or a continuously
integrating
radiation dose rate monitor that alarms when a preset integrated
dose is received.We have reviewed Inspection
Report 50-333/78-16
and take issue with the sec-'"*the inspector s finding that the alleged infraction
exists.The specification
'ited clearly states"one or more of the following." We maintain that no vio-lation exists since the operators and technicians
referred to in the Inspection
Report were acting in compliance
with Technical Specification
6.11(A)I.C.(your item A.3 above)in that: 1)The digital radiation meter in question is a radiation dose rate moni-toring device, therefore satisfies the requirement
of having a"radia-tion dose rate monitoring
device." 2)These instruments
are used by individuals
qualified in radiation pro-tection procedures.
3)High radiation area entries made using these radiation dose rate moni-toring devices are, made in accordance
with the plant radiation protection
procedures (Extended RWP).4)Only those personnel specifically
qualified may use this Extended RWP procedure.
Individuals
so trained are qualifed to exercise positive control over the activities
within the area.The digital meters are used because they are lightweight, compact, easy to oper-ate, accurate, and have a wide range (lmR/hr to 999R/hr).The operators and technicians
carry these meters with them while making routine plant"rounds." RWPs used in connection
with pe'rforming
maintenance
work in high radiation areas specify that continuous
reading rate meters are to be used or a radiation pro-tection technician
assigned to provide monitoring
during the progress of the job.We therefore contend that we are not in violation of our Technical Specifications
and respectfully
request that the Notice of Violation be withdrawn.
Very truly yours,~gggIi/Q<'I~~~John D.Leonard, Jr.Resident Manager JDL:smr  
DISTRIBUTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
NRC Director, Office of Inspection
NRC Director, Office of Inspection 8 Enforcement (3 copies)
8 Enforcement
SNRC Director, Office of Hanagement Information 8 Program Control (3 copies)
(3 copies)SNRC Director, Office of Hanagement
G. T. Berry P. Lyons/P. Rajaram J. Davis J. Boston J. Griffin P. Early R. Burns Fi le}}
Information
8 Program Control (3 copies)G.P.J.J.J.P.R.Fi T.Berry Lyons/P.Rajaram Davis Boston Griffin Early Burns le
}}

Latest revision as of 02:30, 4 February 2020

Responds to NRC 780919 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-333/78-16.Disputes Alleged Infraction & Requests Notice of Violation Be Withdrawn
ML17324A123
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/04/1978
From: Leonard J
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To: Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML17207A152 List:
References
NUDOCS 7901180249
Download: ML17324A123 (4)


Text

Ie sm

~n POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT P.O. BOX 41 JOHN D. LEONARD, JR.

Resident Manager Lycoming, New York 13093 315 342.3840 October, 4, 1978 JAFP-78 512 Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

Reference:

Docket f50-333 IE Inspection f78-16

Dear Mr. Grier:

With reference to the 'inspection conducted by Mr. K. Plumlee of your office on August 31 and September 1, 1978, at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.201 of Part II of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations we are submitting oor reply to item A or ~Ap endix A or the Notice or Violation transmitted by your letter dated September 19, 1978 as received by the undersigned on September 22, 1978.

APPENDIX A Notice of Violation Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on August 31 and Septem-ber 1, 1978, it appears that one of your activities was not conducted in full compliance with the conditions of your NRC Facility License No. DPR-59 as indicated below. This item is an infraction.

A. Technical Specifications Section 6.11.A, which was effective July 28, 1978, requires that any individual or group of individuals permitted to enter high radiation areas be provided with or accompanied by one or more of the following:

1, A radiation monitoring device which continuously indicates the radia-tion dose rate in the area.

2. A radiation monitoring device which continuously integrates the radia-tion dose rate in the area and alarms when a preset integrated dose is received. Entry into such areas with this monitoring device may be made after the dose rate level in the area has been established and personnel have been made knowledgeable qf them.

'780%18o3'Ig

Page 2 An individual qualified in radiation protection procedures who is equipped with a radiation dose rate monitoring device. This indi-vidual shall be responsible for providing positive control over the activities within the area and shall perform periodic radiation sur-veillance at the frequency specified by the facility in the Radiation Work Permit.

Contrary to the above, up to September I 1978, unaccompanied individuals (operators and technicians) were routinely permitted to enter high radiation areas without being provided with a continuously indicating dose rate moni-toring device, or a continuously integrating radiation dose rate monitor that alarms when a preset integrated dose is received.

We have reviewed Inspection Report 50-333/78-16 and take issue with the sec-the inspector s finding that the alleged infraction exists. The specification clearly states "one or more of the following." We maintain that no vio- 'ited lation exists since the operators and technicians referred to in the Inspection Report were acting in compliance with Technical Specification 6.11(A) I.C.

(your item A.3 above) in that:

1) The digital radiation meter in question is a radiation dose rate moni-toring device, therefore satisfies the requirement of having a "radia-tion dose rate monitoring device."
2) These instruments are used by individuals qualified in radiation pro-tection procedures.
3) High radiation area entries made using these radiation dose rate moni-toring devices are, made in accordance with the plant radiation protection procedures (Extended RWP).
4) Only those personnel specifically qualified may use this Extended RWP procedure. Individuals so trained are qualifed to exercise positive control over the activities within the area.

The digital meters are used because they are lightweight, compact, easy to oper-ate, accurate, and have a wide range (lmR/hr to 999R/hr). The operators and technicians carry these meters with them while making routine plant "rounds."

RWPs used in connection with pe'rforming maintenance work in high radiation areas specify that continuous reading rate meters are to be used or a radiation pro-tection technician assigned to provide monitoring during the progress of the job.

We therefore contend that we are not in violation of our Technical Specifications and respectfully request that the Notice of Violation be withdrawn.

Very truly yours,~

gggIi /Q<'I ~~~

John D. Leonard, Jr.

Resident Manager JDL:smr

DISTRIBUTION:

NRC Director, Office of Inspection 8 Enforcement (3 copies)

SNRC Director, Office of Hanagement Information 8 Program Control (3 copies)

G. T. Berry P. Lyons/P. Rajaram J. Davis J. Boston J. Griffin P. Early R. Burns Fi le