ML17324A123: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/04/1978
| issue date = 10/04/1978
| title = Responds to NRC 780919 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-333/78-16.Disputes Alleged Infraction & Requests Notice of Violation Be Withdrawn
| title = Responds to NRC 780919 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-333/78-16.Disputes Alleged Infraction & Requests Notice of Violation Be Withdrawn
| author name = LEONARD J D
| author name = Leonard J
| author affiliation = POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
| author affiliation = POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
| addressee name = GRIER B H
| addressee name = Grier B
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| docket = 05000333
| docket = 05000333
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000333/1978016]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Iesm~nPOWERAUTHORITY
{{#Wiki_filter:Ie sm
OFTHESTATEOFNEWYORKJAMESA.FITZPATRICK
~n POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT P.O. BOX 41 JOHN D. LEONARD, JR.
NUCLEARPOWERPLANTJOHND.LEONARD,JR.ResidentManagerOctober,4,1978JAFP-78-512P.O.BOX41Lycoming,
Resident Manager                                                                  Lycoming, New York 13093 315 342.3840 October, 4, 1978 JAFP-78   512 Mr. Boyce H.       Grier, Director United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region      1 631  Park Avenue King of Prussia,         Pennsylvania   19406
NewYork13093315342.3840Mr.BoyceH.Grier,DirectorUnitedStatesNuclearRegulatory
 
Commission
==Reference:==
Region1631ParkAvenueKingofPrussia,Pennsylvania
Docket f50-333              IE  Inspection f78-16
19406Reference:
 
Docketf50-333DearMr.Grier:IEInspection
==Dear Mr.       Grier:==
f78-16Withreference
 
tothe'inspection
With reference to the 'inspection conducted by Mr. K. Plumlee of your office on August 31 and September 1, 1978, at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.201 of Part II of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations we are submitting oor reply to item A or ~Ap endix A or the Notice or Violation transmitted by your letter dated September 19, 1978 as received by the undersigned on September 22, 1978.
conducted
APPENDIX A Notice of Violation Based on the      results of  an NRC  inspection conducted   on August 31 and Septem-ber 1, 1978,       it  appears  that one of your activities    was not conducted in    full compliance with the conditions of your NRC Facility            License No. DPR-59 as indicated below. This item is an infraction.
byMr.K.PlumleeofyourofficeonAugust31andSeptember
A. Technical Specifications Section 6.11.A, which was effective July 28, 1978, requires that any individual or group of individuals permitted to enter high radiation areas be provided with or accompanied by one or more of the following:
1,1978,attheJamesA.FitzPatrick
1,     A  radiation monitoring device which continuously indicates the radia-tion dose rate in the area.
NuclearPowerPlant,andinaccordance
: 2.     A radiation monitoring device which continuously integrates the radia-tion dose rate in the area and alarms when a preset integrated dose is received. Entry into such areas with this monitoring device may be made after the dose rate level in the area has been established and personnel have been made knowledgeable qf them.
withtheprovisions
                                                                    '780%18o3'Ig
ofSection2.201ofPartIIofTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations
 
wearesubmitting
Page 2 An individual qualified in radiation protection procedures who is equipped with a radiation dose rate monitoring device. This indi-vidual shall    be responsible for providing positive control over the activities within    the area and shall perform periodic radiation sur-veillance at the frequency specified by the facility in the Radiation Work Permit.
oorreplytoitemAor~ApendixAortheNoticeorViolation
Contrary to the above, up to September I  1978, unaccompanied individuals (operators and technicians) were routinely permitted to enter high radiation areas without being provided with a continuously indicating dose rate moni-toring device, or a continuously integrating radiation dose rate monitor that alarms when a preset integrated dose is received.
transmitted
We  have reviewed Inspection Report 50-333/78-16 and take issue        with the sec-the inspector    s  finding that the alleged infraction exists. The specification clearly states "one or more of the following." We maintain that no vio-       'ited lation exists since the operators and technicians referred to in the Inspection Report were acting in compliance with Technical Specification 6.11(A) I.C.
byyourletterdatedSeptember
(your item A.3 above) in that:
19,1978asreceivedbytheundersigned
: 1)   The  digital radiation meter in question is a radiation dose rate moni-toring device, therefore satisfies the requirement of having a "radia-tion dose rate monitoring device."
onSeptember
: 2)   These  instruments are used by individuals qualified in radiation pro-tection procedures.
22,1978.APPENDIXANoticeofViolation
: 3)   High  radiation area entries made using these radiation dose rate moni-toring devices are, made in accordance with the plant radiation protection procedures   (Extended RWP).
BasedontheresultsofanNRCinspection
: 4)   Only those personnel    specifically qualified may use  this  Extended RWP procedure. Individuals so trained are qualifed to exercise positive control over the activities within the area.
conducted
The  digital  meters are used because they are lightweight, compact, easy to oper-ate, accurate,   and have a wide range (lmR/hr to 999R/hr). The operators and technicians carry these meters with them while making routine plant "rounds."
onAugust31andSeptem-ber1,1978,itappearsthatoneofyouractivities
RWPs  used in connection with pe'rforming maintenance work in high radiation areas specify that continuous reading rate meters are to be used or a radiation pro-tection technician assigned to provide monitoring during the progress of the job.
wasnotconducted
We  therefore contend that    we are not in violation of our Technical Specifications and  respectfully request that the Notice of Violation be withdrawn.
infullcompliance
Very truly yours,~
withtheconditions
gggIi /Q<'I ~~~
ofyourNRCFacilityLicenseNo.DPR-59asindicated
John D. Leonard, Jr.
below.Thisitemisaninfraction.
Resident Manager JDL:smr
A.Technical
 
Specifications
Section6.11.A,whichwaseffective
July28,1978,requiresthatanyindividual
orgroupofindividuals
permitted
toenterhighradiation
areasbeprovidedwithoraccompanied
byoneormoreofthefollowing:
1,Aradiation
monitoring
devicewhichcontinuously
indicates
theradia-tiondoserateinthearea.2.Aradiation
monitoring
devicewhichcontinuously
integrates
theradia-tiondoserateintheareaandalarmswhenapresetintegrated
doseisreceived.
Entryintosuchareaswiththismonitoring
devicemaybemadeafterthedoseratelevelintheareahasbeenestablished
andpersonnel
havebeenmadeknowledgeable
qfthem.'780%18o3'Ig  
   
Page2Anindividual
qualified
inradiation
protection
procedures
whoisequippedwitharadiation
doseratemonitoring
device.Thisindi-vidualshallberesponsible
forproviding
positivecontrolovertheactivities
withintheareaandshallperformperiodicradiation
sur-veillance
atthefrequency
specified
bythefacilityintheRadiation
WorkPermit.Contrarytotheabove,uptoSeptember
I1978,unaccompanied
individuals
(operators
andtechnicians)
wereroutinely
permitted
toenterhighradiation
areaswithoutbeingprovidedwithacontinuously
indicating
doseratemoni-toringdevice,oracontinuously
integrating
radiation
doseratemonitorthatalarmswhenapresetintegrated
doseisreceived.
WehavereviewedInspection
Report50-333/78-16
andtakeissuewiththesec-'"*theinspector
sfindingthattheallegedinfraction
exists.Thespecification
'itedclearlystates"oneormoreofthefollowing."
Wemaintainthatnovio-lationexistssincetheoperators
andtechnicians
referredtointheInspection
Reportwereactingincompliance
withTechnical
Specification
6.11(A)I.C.(youritemA.3above)inthat:1)Thedigitalradiation
meterinquestionisaradiation
doseratemoni-toringdevice,therefore
satisfies
therequirement
ofhavinga"radia-tiondoseratemonitoring
device."2)Theseinstruments
areusedbyindividuals
qualified
inradiation
pro-tectionprocedures.
3)Highradiation
areaentriesmadeusingtheseradiation
doseratemoni-toringdevicesare,madeinaccordance
withtheplantradiation
protection
procedures
(Extended
RWP).4)Onlythosepersonnel
specifically
qualified
mayusethisExtendedRWPprocedure.
Individuals
sotrainedarequalifedtoexercisepositivecontrolovertheactivities
withinthearea.Thedigitalmetersareusedbecausetheyarelightweight,
compact,easytooper-ate,accurate,
andhaveawiderange(lmR/hrto999R/hr).
Theoperators
andtechnicians
carrythesemeterswiththemwhilemakingroutineplant"rounds."
RWPsusedinconnection
withpe'rforming
maintenance
workinhighradiation
areasspecifythatcontinuous
readingratemetersaretobeusedoraradiation
pro-tectiontechnician
assignedtoprovidemonitoring
duringtheprogressofthejob.Wetherefore
contendthatwearenotinviolation
ofourTechnical
Specifications
andrespectfully
requestthattheNoticeofViolation
bewithdrawn.
Verytrulyyours,~gggIi/Q<'I~~~JohnD.Leonard,Jr.ResidentManagerJDL:smr  
DISTRIBUTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
NRCDirector,
NRC Director, Office of Inspection 8 Enforcement (3 copies)
OfficeofInspection
SNRC  Director, Office of Hanagement Information 8 Program Control (3 copies)
8Enforcement
G. T. Berry P. Lyons/P. Rajaram J. Davis J. Boston J. Griffin P. Early R. Burns Fi le}}
(3copies)SNRCDirector,
OfficeofHanagement
Information
8ProgramControl(3copies)G.P.J.J.J.P.R.FiT.BerryLyons/P.RajaramDavisBostonGriffinEarlyBurnsle
}}

Latest revision as of 02:30, 4 February 2020

Responds to NRC 780919 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-333/78-16.Disputes Alleged Infraction & Requests Notice of Violation Be Withdrawn
ML17324A123
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/04/1978
From: Leonard J
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To: Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML17207A152 List:
References
NUDOCS 7901180249
Download: ML17324A123 (4)


Text

Ie sm

~n POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT P.O. BOX 41 JOHN D. LEONARD, JR.

Resident Manager Lycoming, New York 13093 315 342.3840 October, 4, 1978 JAFP-78 512 Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

Reference:

Docket f50-333 IE Inspection f78-16

Dear Mr. Grier:

With reference to the 'inspection conducted by Mr. K. Plumlee of your office on August 31 and September 1, 1978, at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.201 of Part II of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations we are submitting oor reply to item A or ~Ap endix A or the Notice or Violation transmitted by your letter dated September 19, 1978 as received by the undersigned on September 22, 1978.

APPENDIX A Notice of Violation Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on August 31 and Septem-ber 1, 1978, it appears that one of your activities was not conducted in full compliance with the conditions of your NRC Facility License No. DPR-59 as indicated below. This item is an infraction.

A. Technical Specifications Section 6.11.A, which was effective July 28, 1978, requires that any individual or group of individuals permitted to enter high radiation areas be provided with or accompanied by one or more of the following:

1, A radiation monitoring device which continuously indicates the radia-tion dose rate in the area.

2. A radiation monitoring device which continuously integrates the radia-tion dose rate in the area and alarms when a preset integrated dose is received. Entry into such areas with this monitoring device may be made after the dose rate level in the area has been established and personnel have been made knowledgeable qf them.

'780%18o3'Ig

Page 2 An individual qualified in radiation protection procedures who is equipped with a radiation dose rate monitoring device. This indi-vidual shall be responsible for providing positive control over the activities within the area and shall perform periodic radiation sur-veillance at the frequency specified by the facility in the Radiation Work Permit.

Contrary to the above, up to September I 1978, unaccompanied individuals (operators and technicians) were routinely permitted to enter high radiation areas without being provided with a continuously indicating dose rate moni-toring device, or a continuously integrating radiation dose rate monitor that alarms when a preset integrated dose is received.

We have reviewed Inspection Report 50-333/78-16 and take issue with the sec-the inspector s finding that the alleged infraction exists. The specification clearly states "one or more of the following." We maintain that no vio- 'ited lation exists since the operators and technicians referred to in the Inspection Report were acting in compliance with Technical Specification 6.11(A) I.C.

(your item A.3 above) in that:

1) The digital radiation meter in question is a radiation dose rate moni-toring device, therefore satisfies the requirement of having a "radia-tion dose rate monitoring device."
2) These instruments are used by individuals qualified in radiation pro-tection procedures.
3) High radiation area entries made using these radiation dose rate moni-toring devices are, made in accordance with the plant radiation protection procedures (Extended RWP).
4) Only those personnel specifically qualified may use this Extended RWP procedure. Individuals so trained are qualifed to exercise positive control over the activities within the area.

The digital meters are used because they are lightweight, compact, easy to oper-ate, accurate, and have a wide range (lmR/hr to 999R/hr). The operators and technicians carry these meters with them while making routine plant "rounds."

RWPs used in connection with pe'rforming maintenance work in high radiation areas specify that continuous reading rate meters are to be used or a radiation pro-tection technician assigned to provide monitoring during the progress of the job.

We therefore contend that we are not in violation of our Technical Specifications and respectfully request that the Notice of Violation be withdrawn.

Very truly yours,~

gggIi /Q<'I ~~~

John D. Leonard, Jr.

Resident Manager JDL:smr

DISTRIBUTION:

NRC Director, Office of Inspection 8 Enforcement (3 copies)

SNRC Director, Office of Hanagement Information 8 Program Control (3 copies)

G. T. Berry P. Lyons/P. Rajaram J. Davis J. Boston J. Griffin P. Early R. Burns Fi le