ML17208A957: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17208A957
| number = ML17208A957
| issue date = 08/04/1980
| issue date = 08/04/1980
| title = Suppls Response to Ie Bulletin 80-04, Analysis of PWR Main Stream Line Break W/Continued Feedwater Addition. Complete Analysis of Automatic Auxiliary Feedwater Initiation, Supports Installation of Automatic Sys
| title = Suppls Response to IE Bulletin 80-04, Analysis of PWR Main Stream Line Break W/Continued Feedwater Addition. Complete Analysis of Automatic Auxiliary Feedwater Initiation, Supports Installation of Automatic Sys
| author name = UHRIG R E
| author name = Uhrig R
| author affiliation = CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name = OREILLY J P
| addressee name = Oreilly J
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| docket = 05000335
| docket = 05000335
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:FLORIOA POWER II LIGHT COMPANY August 4, 1980 L-80-253 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director, Region  II Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101  Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia    30303
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
Re:
50-3 ulletin 80-04  Su  lemental Re ort The  St. Lucie Plant NRC Resident Inspector has requested that we supplement our  May 8, 1980 response to Bulletin 80-04 (FPL letter L-80-145). In that report we explained that the St. Lucie Plants'eedwater and Condensate systems were properly isolated on MSIS as provided in the original system designs and that AFll was manually initiated only after operator determination of the appropriate response to avoid overfeeding a faulty steam generator.
This subject is discussed in the PSL FSAR (section 6.2.1.3.2, pages 6.2 - 41 through 6.2-49). Me also stated that an analysis assuming automatic AFW initiation was in progress to support final installation and activation of the automatic system. This analysis has been completed and was submitted to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation's Division of Licensing on June 20, 1980, (FPL letter L-80-175) with a copy to the Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement. This letter completes our response to Bulletin 80-04.
Very  truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems    8  Technology REU/PLP/pa Attachment cc:    Harold F. Reis, Esquire PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE 80000009QO}}

Latest revision as of 01:16, 30 October 2019

Suppls Response to IE Bulletin 80-04, Analysis of PWR Main Stream Line Break W/Continued Feedwater Addition. Complete Analysis of Automatic Auxiliary Feedwater Initiation, Supports Installation of Automatic Sys
ML17208A957
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/04/1980
From: Robert E. Uhrig
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
IEB-80-04, IEB-80-4, L-80-253, NUDOCS 8009030320
Download: ML17208A957 (1)


Text

FLORIOA POWER II LIGHT COMPANY August 4, 1980 L-80-253 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director, Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Re:

50-3 ulletin 80-04 Su lemental Re ort The St. Lucie Plant NRC Resident Inspector has requested that we supplement our May 8, 1980 response to Bulletin 80-04 (FPL letter L-80-145). In that report we explained that the St. Lucie Plants'eedwater and Condensate systems were properly isolated on MSIS as provided in the original system designs and that AFll was manually initiated only after operator determination of the appropriate response to avoid overfeeding a faulty steam generator.

This subject is discussed in the PSL FSAR (section 6.2.1.3.2, pages 6.2 - 41 through 6.2-49). Me also stated that an analysis assuming automatic AFW initiation was in progress to support final installation and activation of the automatic system. This analysis has been completed and was submitted to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation's Division of Licensing on June 20, 1980, (FPL letter L-80-175) with a copy to the Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement. This letter completes our response to Bulletin 80-04.

Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/PLP/pa Attachment cc: Harold F. Reis, Esquire PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE 80000009QO