ML20214T421: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:7,o 3 | ||
37 | |||
,1 2 | |||
,._2.-- | |||
=- | |||
1 s-- | |||
's o aa r | |||
[ | [ | ||
e,, | |||
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e | |||
o e,E ftEGION V 0, | |||
g 1450 MARIA LANE. SUITE 210 j | |||
,d WALNUT CREE K, CALIFORNIA 94596 cci 2 8 | |||
i t | |||
MEMORANDUM TO: | |||
D. C. Eisenhut, Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
) | |||
FROM: | |||
T. W. Bishop, Director i | |||
Division of Reactor Safety & Projects | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
DIABLO CANYON UNIT I HIGH-RANGE NOBLE GAS EFFLUENT MONITOR RE-29 (NUREG 0737, Item II.F.1, ATTACHMENT 1) SEISMIC DESIGN | DIABLO CANYON UNIT I HIGH-RANGE NOBLE GAS EFFLUENT MONITOR RE-29 (NUREG 0737, Item II.F.1, ATTACHMENT 1) SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA - REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF LEAD RESPONSIBILITY - | ||
j DOCKET No. 50-275 | |||
j | ) | ||
1 During a Special Inspection of the PASS during the week of June 18-22, 1984, it was noted by the inspector that the High-Range Noble Gas Accident Monitor i | |||
1 | |||
RE-29 did not appear to have been seismically mounted. The licensee performed a seismic analysis of this monitor as a result of the inspector's inquiry. | RE-29 did not appear to have been seismically mounted. The licensee performed a seismic analysis of this monitor as a result of the inspector's inquiry. | ||
Region V received the enclosed PG&E IOM on October 1, 1984. | Region V received the enclosed PG&E IOM on October 1, 1984. | ||
Based on discussions with the Radiation Protection Manager on October 1, 1984, Region V was informed that in view of the existing requirements they have no | Based on discussions with the Radiation Protection Manager on October 1, 1984, Region V was informed that in view of the existing requirements they have no intention to implement the recommendations described in the enclosure. | ||
i We consider implementation of the recommendation to be reasonable, prudent and j, | |||
i | of trivial cost. However, we are sensitive to the back-fitting concern and request you review this matter and advise us as to whether or not the present seismic capabilities are acceptable. | ||
Thank you for your consideration. | Thank you for your consideration. | ||
,[ | |||
?U 4 [ T. W. Bis op, Director Division of Reactor Safety & Projects | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
Interoffice Memorandum Diablo Canyor Project | |||
#058490 dtd 9/14/84 4 | |||
cc w/ encl: | |||
G. Knighton, NRR l | |||
H. Schierling, NRR R. Dodds, RV | |||
/* | |||
/ | |||
0706100250 870604 L | |||
1 PDR FOIA HOLMES 86-197 PDR | |||
~. | |||
0G8490 | |||
~ | |||
.ua ::, | |||
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM q | |||
Diablo CanyonProjectm -,.. n x | |||
~ | |||
e | |||
. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY | |||
\\ | |||
"BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION 1 | |||
To R. C. Thornberry/ Attn: R. Patterson o.t. | |||
Septamb r 14, 1984 | |||
: 3. B. Hoch/G. H. Peore Fa. No. | |||
52.19 From j | |||
m Management - DCP RE Seismic Evaluation sg i | |||
DCPP 45/10/B29 B-0881 | |||
+ | |||
g,,,,, | |||
CHEM & RAO P90T At I | |||
RNG HWCF | ,sva onc Ja< tv aE SEP. 2 41984. LW WAO SJFB as - | ||
,, ser RNG HWCF M ho i | |||
REFERDJCE: 104 from J. C. Carroll to J. B. Hoch/ Attn G. Q Q re | |||
(( | (( | ||
l | i dated August 20, 1984 Chren 4056610 | ||
.a rumu. nm l | |||
C & RP FILE RETURN TC | |||
.l t'e n radiaticn nonitor RE-29 is ncn-class 1 equipment mounted on a steel a | |||
platform at EL 140 within Area L. | |||
The seismic design basis for this | |||
} | |||
equi;z,ent -as in accordance with UBC Zcne 4 requirements (Horizontal l | |||
acceleraticn - 0.2 g). | |||
'Ihe seismic capability of the monitor's present anchorage is as follows: | |||
(I) Horizontal & Vertical Seismic acceleraticn acting simultaneously (a) 0.6 g based cn AISC allcwable stress (b) 1.0 g based cn yield stres' i of'the materials. | (I) Horizontal & Vertical Seismic acceleraticn acting simultaneously (a) 0.6 g based cn AISC allcwable stress (b) 1.0 g based cn yield stres' i of'the materials. | ||
7 | |||
'Ihe above capacities are based cn as is" configuratico in which it was noted that toth drill and tap screws are not effective in transferrirg the loads to the platform. 'Ibe seismic capacity of the anchorage would be enhanced if either of the follcwing (a-)-oc-(b) is taken: | |||
(a) Replace toth drill ard tap screws with regular A325 tolts with nuts. | (a) Replace toth drill ard tap screws with regular A325 tolts with nuts. | ||
i (b) Provide 1/4" fillet weld (4 inches long) between 3/4" plate and W4X13 supporting mamb r of the same side as drill and tap screws. | i (b) Provide 1/4" fillet weld (4 inches long) between 3/4" plate and W4X13 supporting mamb r of the same side as drill and tap screws. | ||
'Ihe enhanced capacities will bes (II) Horizcntal & Vertical Seis=ic Acceleraticns acting sin:ultaneously (a) 1.7 g based cm AISC allowable stress (b) 3.4 g based cn yield stress of materials SEP 2 01984 | |||
r. | |||
_ 3-R.C. 'Ihornberry/Attna R. Patterscm | v. | ||
_ 3-R.C. 'Ihornberry/Attna R. Patterscm Septa ber 14, 1984 i | |||
058490 | |||
~ If a dynamic analysis is performed, the seismic forcra inposed on the ntnitor during the three seismic events considered for class 1, structures will be Morizcntal Vertical Earthquake 1 | |||
acaleration acceleration Event | |||
.a) 0.65 g 0.13 g DE f | |||
-) | |||
b) 1.30 g 0.27 g DDE c) 2.3 g 0.52 g HOSGRI | |||
'1herefore if the monitor's anchorage is modified per above h.;endations, the enhanced capacity wx21d exceed the seismic denand inposed by DE, DDE l | |||
and Hosgri earthquake events. | |||
I i | I i | ||
'1his is a caplete response to the above referenced ICH. | |||
i 1 | i 1 | ||
I | I J. B. | ||
3 vitten sponse Required: No m/ | |||
3 | c.c. J.C. Carroll 77/1435 W.H. White 45/26/A31 J.V. Boots DCPP N.O. Shah 45/26/C36 R.J. ftDevitt 77/1467 R.A. Bitting 45/9/D16 G.R. Kast 77/1435 l | ||
l t | |||
c.c. J.C. Carroll | |||
l t | |||
l | l | ||
[023/05] | [023/05] | ||
.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:26, 4 December 2024
| ML20214T421 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1984 |
| From: | Bishop T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20213E738 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-86-197, TASK-2.F.1, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8706100258 | |
| Download: ML20214T421 (3) | |
Text
7,o 3
37
,1 2
,._2.--
=-
1 s--
's o aa r
[
e,,
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e
o e,E ftEGION V 0,
g 1450 MARIA LANE. SUITE 210 j
,d WALNUT CREE K, CALIFORNIA 94596 cci 2 8
i t
MEMORANDUM TO:
D. C. Eisenhut, Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
)
FROM:
T. W. Bishop, Director i
Division of Reactor Safety & Projects
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON UNIT I HIGH-RANGE NOBLE GAS EFFLUENT MONITOR RE-29 (NUREG 0737, Item II.F.1, ATTACHMENT 1) SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA - REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF LEAD RESPONSIBILITY -
j DOCKET No. 50-275
)
1 During a Special Inspection of the PASS during the week of June 18-22, 1984, it was noted by the inspector that the High-Range Noble Gas Accident Monitor i
RE-29 did not appear to have been seismically mounted. The licensee performed a seismic analysis of this monitor as a result of the inspector's inquiry.
Region V received the enclosed PG&E IOM on October 1, 1984.
Based on discussions with the Radiation Protection Manager on October 1, 1984, Region V was informed that in view of the existing requirements they have no intention to implement the recommendations described in the enclosure.
i We consider implementation of the recommendation to be reasonable, prudent and j,
of trivial cost. However, we are sensitive to the back-fitting concern and request you review this matter and advise us as to whether or not the present seismic capabilities are acceptable.
Thank you for your consideration.
,[
?U 4 [ T. W. Bis op, Director Division of Reactor Safety & Projects
Enclosure:
Interoffice Memorandum Diablo Canyor Project
- 058490 dtd 9/14/84 4
cc w/ encl:
G. Knighton, NRR l
H. Schierling, NRR R. Dodds, RV
/*
/
0706100250 870604 L
~.
0G8490
~
.ua ::,
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM q
Diablo CanyonProjectm -,.. n x
~
e
. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
\\
"BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION 1
To R. C. Thornberry/ Attn: R. Patterson o.t.
Septamb r 14, 1984
- 3. B. Hoch/G. H. Peore Fa. No.
52.19 From j
m Management - DCP RE Seismic Evaluation sg i
DCPP 45/10/B29 B-0881
+
g,,,,,
CHEM & RAO P90T At I
,sva onc Ja< tv aE SEP. 2 41984. LW WAO SJFB as -
,, ser RNG HWCF M ho i
REFERDJCE: 104 from J. C. Carroll to J. B. Hoch/ Attn G. Q Q re
((
i dated August 20, 1984 Chren 4056610
.a rumu. nm l
.l t'e n radiaticn nonitor RE-29 is ncn-class 1 equipment mounted on a steel a
platform at EL 140 within Area L.
The seismic design basis for this
}
equi;z,ent -as in accordance with UBC Zcne 4 requirements (Horizontal l
acceleraticn - 0.2 g).
'Ihe seismic capability of the monitor's present anchorage is as follows:
(I) Horizontal & Vertical Seismic acceleraticn acting simultaneously (a) 0.6 g based cn AISC allcwable stress (b) 1.0 g based cn yield stres' i of'the materials.
7
'Ihe above capacities are based cn as is" configuratico in which it was noted that toth drill and tap screws are not effective in transferrirg the loads to the platform. 'Ibe seismic capacity of the anchorage would be enhanced if either of the follcwing (a-)-oc-(b) is taken:
(a) Replace toth drill ard tap screws with regular A325 tolts with nuts.
i (b) Provide 1/4" fillet weld (4 inches long) between 3/4" plate and W4X13 supporting mamb r of the same side as drill and tap screws.
'Ihe enhanced capacities will bes (II) Horizcntal & Vertical Seis=ic Acceleraticns acting sin:ultaneously (a) 1.7 g based cm AISC allowable stress (b) 3.4 g based cn yield stress of materials SEP 2 01984
r.
v.
_ 3-R.C. 'Ihornberry/Attna R. Patterscm Septa ber 14, 1984 i
058490
~ If a dynamic analysis is performed, the seismic forcra inposed on the ntnitor during the three seismic events considered for class 1, structures will be Morizcntal Vertical Earthquake 1
acaleration acceleration Event
.a) 0.65 g 0.13 g DE f
-)
b) 1.30 g 0.27 g DDE c) 2.3 g 0.52 g HOSGRI
'1herefore if the monitor's anchorage is modified per above h.;endations, the enhanced capacity wx21d exceed the seismic denand inposed by DE, DDE l
and Hosgri earthquake events.
I i
'1his is a caplete response to the above referenced ICH.
i 1
I J. B.
3 vitten sponse Required: No m/
c.c. J.C. Carroll 77/1435 W.H. White 45/26/A31 J.V. Boots DCPP N.O. Shah 45/26/C36 R.J. ftDevitt 77/1467 R.A. Bitting 45/9/D16 G.R. Kast 77/1435 l
l t
l
[023/05]
.