ML20214T311
| ML20214T311 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1984 |
| From: | Rehm T NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Droggitis S NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20213E738 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-86-197 NUDOCS 8706100201 | |
| Download: ML20214T311 (3) | |
Text
,, .
_ ,,,. _- _ _ - _ _--_ - . r- _ _ _m - _ .a
!/
~ Ir r
~* #peuruq%g
.~ '
UNITED STATES g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'[' g j WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
%, / July 31,1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Spiros C. Droggitis ,
Special Assistant to Comissioner Asselstine
, FROM: Thomas Rehm
' Assistant for Operations i Office of the Executive Director i for Operations l
SUBJECT:
STATUS OF 0FFSITE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS I FOR DIABLO CANYON l In response to your verbal request of July 30, 1984, for information
, concerning the status of offsite emergency preparedness for Diablo Canyon, the following documents (with the exception of the ASLB Initial Decision of August 31,1982) are being provided:
, August 31, 1982 ASLB Initial Decision authorizing full power, t issued with requirements and recommendations i regarding emergency preparedness.
September 17, 1982 Staff motion for clarification of Board's Initial Decision regarding FEMA findings.
l I
- September 28, 1982 Board's response to staff motion.
I October 26, 1982 Letter from Grimes, NRC to Krimm, FEMA requested FEMA's assistance in responding to Board's requirements and recomendations.
i December 27, 1983 Letter from Jordan, WRC to Krimm, FEMA informed i FEMA of licensing status and requested information related to October 26, 1982 letter.
April 2, 1984 Letter from Krimm, FEMA to Jordan, NRC provided current status of offsite emergency preparedness at Diablo Canyon.
April 12,1984 Letter from Matthews, IE to Knighton, NRR i transmitted FEMA report.
i n
, /
l O
8706100201 870604 UOUnese$1F _PDR .
. . . 2 t
April 20,1984c Letter from Jordan, NRC to Krimm, FEMA informed FEMA of licensing status and requested priority review of California State emergency plan.
May 10, 1984 Letter from Knighton, NRR to Schuyler, PG&E transmitted FEMA report.
June 29, 1984 Appeal Board decision (ALAB-776) vacated Board's condition that the staff secure additional (final) findings from FEMA.
July 11, 1984 Letter from Krimm, FEMA to Jordan, NRC provided FEMA interim finding on California State 4
I l
July 23, 1984 Letter from Matthews, IE to Knighton, NRR forwarded FEMA report with request that report be transmitted to licensee. In this letter, IE concluded that based on the FEMA reports of April 2 and July 11, 1984, the Board require-e- ments and recommendations on offsite emergency preparedness have been satisfactorily completed.
) Regarding the status of onsite emergency preparedness, the ASLB concluded in I its Initial Decision of August 31, 1982, that onsite emergency preparedness
- for Diablo Canyon provides reasonable assurance that effective protective j measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency.
f l l %
)
Thomas Rc h Assistant for Operations
. Office of the Executive Director for Operations
Enclosures:
As Stated i cc: (See Attached)
I i l
- p. - . ....--.-... - -. - ..._ _- - . . - . ._ . . _
.r.
~ -
_. . ~-- .; ;. __czz;;;;;,xa_;;-- =- ---- . - - _
e
.. . r
- s,,
I 4 Spiros C. Droggitis \}a\)
cc w/o
Enclosure:
R.C. DeYoung, IE J.M. Taylor, IE D.J. Garner, OCM S.H. Chesnut, OCM J.M. Montgomery, OCM J.F. Meyer, OCM
\
L.J. Chandler, ELD D.G. Eisenhut, DL R. A. Scarano, RV E.L. Jordan, IE J.N. Grace, IE S.A. Schwartz, IE
- A F. Kantor, IE I
,I 4
l
- 1 I
i l t
t l
l l
, l l
l
[- -.--- - - __.....,.._.__ ..... . . . _ . . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . , , _ _ _ , _ , _ , _ _ _ , .
J
,,s
. G
-- a Docket No.: 50-275 a JUL 311384 DISTRIBUTION Docket File PRC System L.kef3 Reading MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman Palladino JLee Commissioner Roberts HSchierling Comissioner Asselstine WDircks Comissioner Bernthal Denton/ Case Commissioner Zech MBridgers, EDO
, Attorney, OELD FROM: William J. Qircks DL:LBf3 Executive Director for Operations D. G. Eisenhut
SUBJECT:
ED0 r/f DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1 - INFORMATION FOR FULL POWER BRIEFING As stated in my memorandum of July 24, 1984, attached are the staff's " Briefing Slides" for the upcoming full power Comission meeting on Diablo Canyon Unit 1.
Also attached is the prepared statement by Mr. Isa Yin of the staff. Mr. Yin will be at the meeting and, if requested by the Comission, will present his attached statement and will be available for further coments.
(Signas William 1.Dircks!
William J. Dir.cks Executive Director for Operations
Enclosures:
As stated cc: SECY OPE OGC
'I i
l J
DL:LB#3 D 3 L D: D D* E HSchierlYMg'/ch ,SWK hton TMNo a D
~ l y$84 7/ft/84 K /84 % /84 t
/84 HDe W cks' l/ /84 [ / ///84
, I 0,,-
oaLVbtP4 8, se mi b i
~ s
o ,
~
COMMISSION BRIEFING
^
FULLPOWERL[CENSEAMENDMENT PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
, DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 O
e 6
~
DIABLO. CANYON 1.
4e , e
,.. % . 4 / -
~
o
. +-
l LICENSEE AND PLANT OWNER / LICENSEE - PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (PGaE)
PLANT 2 PWR UNITS NSSS - WESTINGHOUSE: 3338 MWT (1084 MWE)
LARGE, DRY, REINFORCED CONCRETE CONTAINMENT ORIGINAL ARCHITECT ENGINEER -CPG 8E CURRENT ARCHITECT ENGINEER - DIABLO CANYON PROJECT (PG&E / BECHTEL) --
CONSTRUCTOR - PG&E SITE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA C0AST VERY LOW POPULATION AREA HOSGRI FAULT (5.8 KM)
ONSITE EP ADEQUATE:
~
LICENSING BOARD INIT DECS. LOW POWER - JULY 1981 AFFIRMED BY APPEAL BOARD, MAY 1983 COMMISSION DECLINED REVIEW LICENSING BOARD INIT. DECS FULL POWER - AUGUST 1982 ADEQUACY OF 0FFSITE EP (INCLUDING FEM'A FINDINGS):
LICENSING BOARD INIT. DECS, FULL POWER , AUGUST 1982 ASLB REQUIREMENT FOR FORMAL FEMA FINDINGS VACATED - JUNE 1984 LAST EMERGENCY EXERCISE CONDUCTED - OCTOBER 19, 1983 FEMA INTERIM FINDINGS ON STATE PLAN - JULY 1984 4 DIABLO CANYOH 1 SLIDE 1 -
L
n BACKGROUND / CHRONOLOGY .
SEPTEMBER 21, 1981 - COMMISSION BRIEFING RE: LOW-POWER AUTHORIZATION SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 - LOW POWER LICENSE ISSUED LATE SEPTEMBER,1981 " MIRROR IMAGE" PROBLEM DISCOVERED BY PG&E NOVEMBER 19, 1981 - COMMISSION ORDER' SUSPENDS LOW POWER LICENSE-NOVEMBER 19, 1981 - NRR LETTER RE: REQUIREMENTS FOR' FULL POWER DECEMBER 8, 1982 - COMMISSION APPROVES 3-STEP LICENSING PROCESS STEP 1 - FUEL LOAD
~
STEP 2 - CRITICALITY AND OPERATION UP TO 5%
STEP 3 - OPERATION AB0VE 5% POWER NOVEMBER 8, 1983 - COMMISSION APPROVES STER 1: FUEL LOAD AND COLD SYSTEM TESTING i NOVEMBER 20, 1983 - FUEL LOAD COMPLETE
~ ~
JANUARY 25, 1984 - COMMISSION APPROVES HOT SYSTEM TESTING APRIL 13, 1984 - COMMISSION APPROVES STEP 2: OPERATION UP TO 5% POWER (FULL RElt{ STATEMENT OF SUSPENDED LICENSE)
APRIL 29, 1984 - INITIAL CRITICALITY ACHIEVED ..
, MAY 23, 1984 - LOW POWER TESTING COMPLETED 1981 - 1984 - NUMEROUS COMMISSION MEETINGS
- SEVERAL COMMISSION ORDERS i
- NUMEROUS BOARD NOTIFICATIONS
- JULY 25, 1984 - PLANT READY FOR POWER ASCENSION AB0VE 5%' POWER DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 2 b 4 *
-- c.
%r,----- g _ - - , - - e p.---p--.v-- .y.--m-t.t --w+. m- --r -.s-- - - - * - - - - - ---. -w- ey -ma +
~..- .
f SELECTED ISSUE $
COMPLETION OF IDVP/ITP ISSUES F0il FULL POWER DECISION STAFFING AND QUALIFICATIONS SHIFT ADVISORS -
~ ' -
. NUMBER AND EXPERIENCE 0F OPERATORS ALLEGATIONS PIPING AND SUPPORT ISSUES (INCLUDING I YIN CONCERNS)
LONGTERMSEISMICDESIGNBASISREEVAlbATIONPROGRAM PLANT READINESS (INCLUDING LOW POWER TESTING)
CONSTRUCTION QUALITY VERIFICATION HEARING STATUS AND ISSUES FULL POWER LICENSE AMENDMENT e
e o
O DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 3 ,
COMPLETION OF IDVP/ITP ISSUES FOR FULL POWER DECISION SSER 20 (DECEMBER 1983) IDENTIFIES:
9 ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO CRITICALITY / LOW POWER
~
4 ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO FULL POWER COMMISSION BRIEFING MARCH 26, 1984:
9 ISSUES FOR CRITICALITY / LOW P0.WER RESOLVED SSER 24 (JULY 1984):
, DOCUMENTS THE RESOLUTION OF REMAINING ISSUES e
o DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 4
OPERATIONS STAFFING AND QUALIFICATIONS SHIFT ADVISORS (SA)
THE STAFF REVIEWED SA QUALIFICATIONS REVIEWED SA PROCEDURE REVIEWED SA TRAINING PROGRAM REVIEWED EXAMINATIONS OF FIRST GROUP OF SA CANDIDATES MONITORED EXAMINATIONS OF SECOND GROUP OF SA CANDIDATES MONITORED OPERATING CREW PERFORMANCE DURING STARTUP AND LOW-POWER TESTING CONCLUSIONS DIABLO CANYON SHIFT ADVISORS MEET THE GUIDELINES ADOPTED BY THE COMMISSION IN THE CHAIRMAN'S JUNE 14, 1984 LETTER THE DIABLO CANYON SHIFT ADVISORS ARE SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATED WITH, ACCEPTED BY, AND WORKING WITH THE OPERATING SHIFT CREWS O
e DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 5 ,
_____A
__ -- - w w- _ __ _ c : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
' W W Z 3 M
. HHE
, s
. < O CC C HZW W H W
C C .J W Z J
>J OH3 M O W CC O V HZ W W Z M N D H3 N O W t% 4 to O O t%
M CC O W < Q.
H D O Q.
D>
W CC D O ZN M ZM CC O CD O CC W
, MZ N H C. '3:
HO 9-4 & O
<M D C Q.
OH - .JW O WU C CC J JW DM .J J Q. LaJ D D
<M C CC Cr w Z W W M > CC J Cn O LA e W tn "*
C3 LAJ CD CC M
CD J m 3 Z 7 O
- M W H O <
0 m W v
< J O
-J v M
3
< M
& J *
& H C M C W
>-- M Z Z D M Q WHE H - < O CC O
< HZW U1 H O W W C J
J C . 'J .
W .r- J
>J .O cW&D O HZ CC D Cn D HW Cn LAJ O' JVU3 - CD M CC OW<O CC O . m O Q. Q.
LLJ W LLJ Q R e >- O e M g m ~
Z to O e ZM O OH e-4 % M CC M< N O CC LAJ HO r-1 M C1 3
<*-* H O C3 H D C Q.
LAJ to -.J W C J hJ O CC J J> O MM J
<Z LAJ WDD M >J CC Cr W N W O N CC M
LAJ Q:
l DIABLO CANYON 1 l SLIDE 6
~
PIPING g SUPPORTS-ISSUES CONSIDERED BY PEER REVIEW GROUP A,- LICENSE CONDITIONS
- 1. REVIEW OF SMALL BORE COMPUTER CALCULATIONS
- 2. RIGID-RIGID SUPPORTS --
- 3. INACTIVE SNUBBERS
- 4. THERMAL GAPS
- 5. PIPING SYSTEM WALKDOWNS
- 6. " QUICK-FIX" PROGRAM 7, SMALL BORE AND LARGE BORE TECHNICAL ISSUES-B, INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM C. PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES 4
0 DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 7 6 - *- ,=r-em**e w a -+ +.e w * - - +. ,,w -
- ~ \
PIPING & SUPPORTS PARTICIPANTS IN PEER REVIEW GROUP ACTIVITIES :
ORGANIZATION SPECIFIC ISSUES D. ALLIS0N IE QA -
R. B0SNAK NRR LC 2, 3, 6; IDVP T. BURR EG&G LC 2, 3, 6 P, CHEN ETEC LC 1, 4, 5 H. FLECK ETEC LC 1, 4, 5 M. HARTZMAN NRR- .
LC 1, 2, 3, 7; IDVP R. HEISHMAN IE QA J KNIGHT ' NRR K. MAN 0LY REGION I LC 1, 2, 3, 7; IDVP K. MORTON EGaG LC 2, 3, 6 E. RODABAUGH ECR LC 4, 5 B, SAFFELL BCL' LC 2, 3, 6; IDVP E, SULLIVAN NRR LC 4, 5; IDVP J. TAYL0d IE ,
R. VOLLMER NRR I. YIN INVOLVED IN GROUP ACTIVITIES TO EXTENT POSSIBLE DIABLO' CANYON 1
- -- ,'e
.- f
PIPING g SUPPORTS PRINCIPAL PEER REVIEW GROUP ACTIVITIES MEETINGS WITH ACRS a SUBCOMMITTEE. I4 MEETINGS WITH LICENSEE 3 DESIGN AUDITS -
7 SITE INSPECTIONS 3 -
MEETINGS WITH ALLEGERS 3 REVIEW GROUP MEETINGS ,
14 STAFFANDCONSULTANTSRESOURCESINEXCES50F2 PROFESSIONAL STAFF YEARS D
e DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 9 .
e
s- .
l PIPING a SUPPORTS CONCLUSIONS OF PEER REVIEW GROUP SEVEN CONDITIONS IN LOW POWER LICENSE SATISFACTORILY RESOLVED PREVIOUS STAFF CONCLUSIONS ON INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM REMAIN VALID -
PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES INVOLVING ONSITE ENGINEERING RESOLVED ABOVE ISSUES SHOULD NOT PREVENT OPERATION OF DIABLO CANYON AT FULL POWER i
~
)
DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 10 !
l
. - - , , e .
. _ . - -- .as-,
- c. , ;
SEISMIC DESIGN BASIS REEVALUATION PROGRAM
- ACRS LETTER OF JULY 14, 1978 SUGGESTED:
~
"THAT THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF DIABLO CANYON BE REEVALUATED IN ABOUT TEN YEARS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT NEW INFORMATION"
" CROUCH PAPER" (EARLY 1984) - NEW INTERPRETATION OF FAULTING IN CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MEETINGS:
COMMISSION: MARCH 26-27, 1984 (FIRST STAFF PROPOSAL FOR LICENSE CONDITION TO COMMISSION)
APRIL 13, 1984 -
NRC STAFF /PG8E: MAY 8, 1984 ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE: MAY 24, 1984 ACRS FULL COMMITTEE: JUNE 14, 1984
- - COMMISSION ORDER CLI 84-5 (APRIL 13, 1984) AND LETTER FROM CHAIRMAN TO ACRS (APRIL 13, 1984) REGARDING LICENSE CONDITION FOR PROGRAM
- ~
LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 9 (APRIL 18, 1984) SETS FORTH LICENSE
. CONDITION ACRS LETTER (JUNE 20, 1984) ENDORSES SPECIFIC PROGRAM ELEMENTS AS PROPOSED BY STAFF LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 10 (PROPOSED) SETS FORTH SPECIFIC PROGRAM ELEMENTS AS LICENSE CONDITION ,
DIABLO CANYON 1
_ SLIDE 11 -
h
FOUR ELEMENTS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN BASIS REEVALUATION PROGRAM (1) EVALUATE NEW INFORMATION (2) REEVALUATE DESIGN BASIS EARTHOUAKE --
(3) REEVALUATE GROUND MOTION (4) ASSESS RESULTS FROM ITEMS (1), (2) AND (3) AB0VE UTILIZING PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS AND DETERMINISTIC STUDIES PROGRAM TO BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF BY JANUARY 1985 PROGRAM TO BE CONDUCTED BY PGaE ALSO, PARALLEL EFFORT BY' STAFF -
e o e 9 DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 12
- .-_ - - - _ _ _ - 4 . w u s. .,.+ ~ r +- . = +-- ww e t e
O PLANT READINESS FULL POWER OPERATIONAL READINESS LOW POWER TEST PROGRAM -
EVALUATION OF OPERATING CREWS PERFORMANCE e
STATUS OF CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS ITEMS R.EQUIRING ADDITIONAL LICENSEE ACTION PRIOR TO EXCEEDING 5% POWER e
O '-
O a
a O
DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 13 .
t 6
-,, + * . . , . + + * .,,w= , $,. ..- aww - ,
CONSTRUCTION QUALITY VERIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF PLANT HARDWARE QUALITY VERIFICATIONS 1, THE REGULAR NRC INSPECTION PROGRAM-
- DEFINED BY IE MANUAL CHAPTER 2512 AND PREDECESSORS
- SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF INSPECTORS' TIME GIVEN TO DIRECT INSPECTION OF ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
- PERFORMED DURING PLANT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION
- 2. NRC FOLLOW-UP ON ALLEGATIONS , ,
THOUSANDS OF HOURS OF NRC STAFF EFFORT DEVOTED TO THE FOLLOW-UP AND RESOLUTION OF ALLEGATIONS IN RECENT MONTHS COVERING:
- SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES
- SAFETY-RELATED PRESSURE BOUNDARIES AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
- SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
- SAFETY-RELATED COMPONENTS
- QUALITY OF SPECIAL PROCESSES ,,
- INSTRUMENTATION, CONTROLS, AND PROTECTIVE FEATURES
- 0THER QUALITY-RELATED INSPECTIONS .
3, OUAllTY VERIFICATIONS PERFORMED BY THIRD PARTIES
- INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (IDVP)
- ASME CODE INSPECTIONS :
- AUTHORIZED CODE INSPECTORS
., DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 14
c e w e d
CONSTRUCTION OVALITY VERIFICATION LICENSEE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SINCE SEPTEMBER 1981 PGaE STOPWORK ORDERS H. P. FOLEY STOPWORK ORDERS PGaE AUDITS H. P. FOLEY AUDITS PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS AUDITS e
e 4
e DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 15 F d
HEARING STATUS APPEAL B0ARD COMPLETED:
CONSTRUCTION QA ALAB-756 (DECEMBER 1983) - DENIED MOTIONS TO RE0 PEN THE RECORD, RE0PENED HEARING ON DESIGN QA ISSUES --
ALAB-763 (MARCH 1984) -
FAVORABLY RESOLVED ISSUES IN CONNECTION WITH, UNIT 1 BUT REQUIRED LICENSE CONDITIONS REGARDING JET IMPINGEMENT ANALYSES AND CCW OPERATION RECENT MOTIONS TO RE0 PEN THE RECORD ON DESIGN QA AND ON CONSTRUCTION QA, AND LICENSEE CHARACTER AND COMPETENCE BASED ON ALLEGATIONS ALAB-775 (JUNE 1984) -
DENIED MOTIONS ,, - ,
EMERGENCY PLANNING .
ALAB-776 (JUNE 1984) -
ON APPEAL BY STAFF AND PG8E, VACATED LICENSING BOARD CONDITION REQUIRING FORMAL FINDINGS BY FEMA PURSUANT TO 44 CFR 350 .
DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 16
HEARING STATUS (CONTINUED)
APPEAL BOARD PENDING:
APPEAL BY GOVERNOR AND JOINT INTERVENORS OF LICENSING BOARD .
INITIAL DECISION AUTHORIZING FULL POWER, AUGUST 1982
- MOTION TO REOPEN RECORD ON SEISMIC ISSUES, JULY 1984 COMMISSION
~~
- PETITIONS FOR REVIEW PENDING ALAB-756 (DENIAL OF INITIAL MOTION TO RE0 PEN RECORD ON CONSTRUCTION QA) .
ALAB-763 (DECISION ON REOPENED DESIGN QA ISSUES)
ALAB-775 (DENIAL OF RECENT MOTIONS TO RE0 PEN RECORD ON DESIGN QA AND ON CONSTRUCTION QA AND LICENSEE-CHARACTER-AND COMPETENCE)
ALAB-776 (VACATED LICENSING BOARD CONDITION REQUIRING FORMAL FEMA FINDINGS PURSUANT TO 44 CFR 350)
- DETERMINATION OF NEED TO CONSIDER EFFECTS OF EARTHOUAKES ON EMERGENCY PLANNING (Cll-84-4)
- IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW 0F LICENSING BOARD AUGUST 1982 DECISION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF FULL POWER Ols.
- APPLICATION FOR STAY OF ANTICIPATED FULL POWER DECI'SION BY COMMISSION, JULY 1984 .
S DIABLO CANYON 1 SLIDE 17
_ m .-_____._________m. . _ _ _
FULL POWER LICENSE AMENDMENT A. COMPLETED LOW POWER LICENSE CONDITIONS:
1, ADDITIONAL JET IMPINGMENT ANALYSES (SSER 24)
- 2. PIPING AND SUPPORT ADEQUACY (SSER 25)
B. REVISED LICENSE CONDITIONS (SSER 27) .
1, MAXIMUM POWER LEVEL (100% - 3338 MWT)
- 2. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (UPDATE)
- 3. FIREPROTECTIONSYSTEM(REFERENC$SSER23)
- 4. EMERGENCY RESPONSE CAPAPILITY (COMPLETION DATES)
- 5. SEISMIC DESIGN BASES REEVALUATION PROGRAM (DETAILS)
- 6. REPORTING 0F VIOLATIONS (10 CFR 50,73 CONFORMANCE) 7, EXPIRATION DATE (APRIL 23, 2008)
C, NEW LICENSE CONDITIONS (SSER 27) .
1, CONTROL OF HEAVY LOADS (NUREG-0612 PHASE 11)
- 2. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (FEMA 44 CFR PART 350; NRC 10 CFR SECTION 50,54(s)(2))
- 3. MASONRY WALLS (CRITERIA AND MODIFICATIONS)
DIABLO CANYON 1 atIDE 18
~
4 o . ,
o TESTImHf EEFORE THE CD'eil5510N HEARlHG FOR ISSUANCE OF DIABLO CANYON UXIT 1 FULL POWER OPEP.ATlHG LICENSE JULY 30, 1984 Preparte By: 1. T. Yin Mr. Chairmn and ecsbers of the Coonission, thann, you for inviting >e to present ry personal view of utters concerning the issuanqe of Diablo Canyon Unit 1 full pover license.
- As you know, I was rtquested by the Headquarttes staf f to participate in the HRC's investigation of allegations concerning 1.he ciinstruction of Diablo Canyon. I was specifically assigned to pursue allegations.in the piping design control are'a. 2.ased on inspections conducted periodically f rf.4 Nove:6er 29,1983 to f.ay 2,1934,1 identified uny significant technical and QA deficiencies. Contrary to the app' roach norr. ally taken by my Region with significant problees, no enforcesent conference was held, nor was there any enforce *ent action taken. No requests were cade for licensee prograe upgrade, and there was no atter.pt to broaden the inspection areas and scope. Defective programs, such as Quiet Fixes and Onsite Project Engineering Group design activities were allowed to continue until July 1934, when the licensee decided to abolish these practices. My request to foliosup on the licenset progra revision was denied.
In the f ollevup of',the seven l.icense ConditTon itens- that were incorporated into the les power license, even though ! vas the instigator for six of the seven items, and would no m ally be considered to be the most knosledgeable san on the issues and details, nevertheless, I was not considered essential in the folic ~up review and evaluation. Peer Review lear inspection for 1 tees Ho.1 and 7 was conducted on the third week of Kay 1954, during ny vacation overseas. Peer Review Teas inspections for items No. 2 to 6 were perforaed during the fourth week of Kay 1984, when I returned froa, vacation,'
and accon;anied the AC15 on the site tour. Subsequent review of the Peer Review Teu reports contained in the draf t SSER revealed that they contain mostly undocur,ented revie<s and casual observations. There vere cases where the inspection segle selected was extrecely small, where probleas originally identified continued to. exist, where reviev criteria wre cesprosited without technical justification, and dere ieu failed to address the specific progru deficiency issues. For the nu=6er of staff assigned and hired to work in the Peer Reviev leans, and the length of tirit spent $1nce the .
April 13, ISH Comission r:eeting, I don't feel as though we've really addressed all the issues.
The 29 page " Concern iters on 10VP Evaluation of L/E and 5/8 Piping and Pipe Support Design," resulting f r,on try revie< of a number of -Cloud reports, we're subsittee to NEP. for evaluation on April 25, 1984 Altnough these were a -
part of my original planned inspection, I recuested HRR staff involvement based on the censideration that: (1) since NRR co mar, aged the program, any 4
~
findings would be against out, wn staffers, and (2) sin:e NRR had already acceptedtheprogram,theyshouldbeabletojxplainthesituation,if -
deficiencies were being identified. The inspection was n:t"s:heduled until the week of June 17, 196t. Burdened by long presentations, indo:trinations for the Special Review Te2.:n res-Sers, discussion on issues unrelated to the 10VP, unavailability of doct=ents that had been stored in recotE~ locations, and ry personal schedule difficulties, the actual tire that l sper*,,,
i inspecting that week was less than 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. My request to travel back Sunday to continue the inspection first thing Monday was denied.
As you can see, I was not pleased with how NRR has been managing and resolving my inspectica findings. I believe additional investigation and inspection effort is warranted to properly close out identified areas of concern. I believe this could be accerplished in three to.five weeks.
This follwup inspection would provide the Ctzmission a clearer picture of the extent of the problec or the lact of problem.
- In any event, if the Ccrmission decides to gr' ant' t5e Diiblo Cenyon 1 a full pner operating license today, I shall respect the Ccrr.ission's judges.ent and decision, and shall cooperate fully in any follwup actions deemed necessary. 1. coking back, I knw that I have been h: nest in my work, and feel that I have fulfilled my assigned duty. Despite difference in professional opinion, I have not doubted the NER nanagecent's honesty and integrity, anc wish them the best of luck in har.dling the r.any other ongoing troubled facilities.
e
..