ML17208A957: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:FLORIOAPOWERIILIGHTCOMPANYAugust4,1980L-80-253Mr.JamesP.O'Reilly,
{{#Wiki_filter:FLORIOA POWER II LIGHT COMPANY August 4, 1980 L-80-253 Mr.James P.O'Reilly, Director, Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
: Director, RegionIIOfficeofInspection andEnforcement U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission 101MariettaStreet,Suite3100Atlanta,Georgia30303


==DearMr.O'Reilly:==
==Dear Mr.O'Reilly:==
 
Re: 50-3 ulletin 80-04 Su lemental Re ort The St.Lucie Plant NRC Resident Inspector has requested that we supplement our May 8, 1980 response to Bulletin 80-04 (FPL letter L-80-145).
Re:50-3ulletin80-04SulementalReortTheSt.LuciePlantNRCResidentInspector hasrequested thatwesupplement ourMay8,1980responsetoBulletin80-04(FPLletterL-80-145).
In that report we explained that the St.Lucie Plants'eedwater and Condensate systems were properly isolated on MSIS as provided in the original system designs and that AFll was manually initiated only after operator determination of the appropriate response to avoid overfeeding a faulty steam generator.
Inthatreportweexplained thattheSt.LuciePlants'eedwater andCondensate systemswereproperlyisolatedonMSISasprovidedintheoriginalsystemdesignsandthatAFllwasmanuallyinitiated onlyafteroperatordetermination oftheappropriate responsetoavoidoverfeeding afaultysteamgenerator.
This subject is discussed in the PSL FSAR (section 6.2.1.3.2, pages 6.2-41 through 6.2-49).Me also stated that an analysis assuming automatic AFW initiation was in progress to support final installation and activation of the automatic system.This analysis has been completed and was submitted to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation's Division of Licensing on June 20, 1980, (FPL letter L-80-175)with a copy to the Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement.
Thissubjectisdiscussed inthePSLFSAR(section6.2.1.3.2, pages6.2-41through6.2-49).Mealsostatedthatananalysisassumingautomatic AFWinitiation wasinprogresstosupportfinalinstallation andactivation oftheautomatic system.Thisanalysishasbeencompleted andwassubmitted totheOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation's DivisionofLicensing onJune20,1980,(FPLletterL-80-175) withacopytotheRegionIIOfficeofInspection andEnforcement.
This letter completes our response to Bulletin 80-04.Very truly yours, Robert E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/PLP/pa Attachment cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire 80000009QO PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE}}
Thislettercompletes ourresponsetoBulletin80-04.Verytrulyyours,RobertE.UhrigVicePresident AdvancedSystems8Technology REU/PLP/pa Attachment cc:HaroldF.Reis,Esquire80000009QO PEOPLE...
SERVINGPEOPLE}}

Revision as of 19:20, 7 July 2018

Suppls Response to IE Bulletin 80-04, Analysis of PWR Main Stream Line Break W/Continued Feedwater Addition. Complete Analysis of Automatic Auxiliary Feedwater Initiation, Supports Installation of Automatic Sys
ML17208A957
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/04/1980
From: UHRIG R E
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: OREILLY J P
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
IEB-80-04, IEB-80-4, L-80-253, NUDOCS 8009030320
Download: ML17208A957 (1)


Text

FLORIOA POWER II LIGHT COMPANY August 4, 1980 L-80-253 Mr.James P.O'Reilly, Director, Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr.O'Reilly:

Re: 50-3 ulletin 80-04 Su lemental Re ort The St.Lucie Plant NRC Resident Inspector has requested that we supplement our May 8, 1980 response to Bulletin 80-04 (FPL letter L-80-145).

In that report we explained that the St.Lucie Plants'eedwater and Condensate systems were properly isolated on MSIS as provided in the original system designs and that AFll was manually initiated only after operator determination of the appropriate response to avoid overfeeding a faulty steam generator.

This subject is discussed in the PSL FSAR (section 6.2.1.3.2, pages 6.2-41 through 6.2-49).Me also stated that an analysis assuming automatic AFW initiation was in progress to support final installation and activation of the automatic system.This analysis has been completed and was submitted to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation's Division of Licensing on June 20, 1980, (FPL letter L-80-175)with a copy to the Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement.

This letter completes our response to Bulletin 80-04.Very truly yours, Robert E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/PLP/pa Attachment cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire 80000009QO PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE