ML22271A620: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML22271A620 | |||
| issue date = 09/29/2022 | |||
| title = Notification of Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection Report 05000400/2023010 | |||
| author name = Baptist J | |||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1 | |||
| addressee name = Haaf T | |||
| addressee affiliation = Duke Energy Progress, LLC | |||
| docket = 05000400 | |||
| license number = NPF-063 | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = IR 2023010 | |||
| document type = Inspection Plan, Letter | |||
| page count = 6 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000400/2023010]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:September 29, 2022 | |||
Mr. Thomas Haaf | |||
Site Vice President | |||
Duke Energy Progress, LLC | |||
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant | |||
5413 Shearon Harris Road | |||
Mail Code HNP01 | |||
New Hill, NC 27562-9300 | |||
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT | |||
COMPREHENSIVE ENGINEERING TEAM INSPECTION - U.S. NUCLEAR | |||
REGULATORY COMMISSION INSPECTION REPORT 05000400/2023010 | |||
Dear Mr. Haaf: | |||
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | |||
Region II staff will conduct a Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection (CETI) at your | |||
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant during the weeks of January 30 and February 13, 2023. | |||
Mr. Paul Carman, a Senior Reactor Inspector from the NRCs Region II office, will lead the | |||
inspection team. The inspection will be conducted in accordance with Inspection Procedure | |||
71111.21M, Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection (CETI). This is a new procedure | |||
that has not been issued yet, but it is anticipated that it will be issued by December 31, 2022. | |||
The inspection will evaluate the capability of components that have been modified and risk- | |||
significant/low-margin components to function as designed and to support proper system | |||
operation. The inspection will also include a review of selected operator actions, and operating | |||
experience, and modifications. | |||
During a telephone conversation on September 26, 2022, with Ms. Sarah McDaniel, we | |||
confirmed arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the two-week onsite | |||
inspection. The schedule is as follows: | |||
Information-gathering visit: Week of December 12, 2022 | |||
Onsite weeks: Weeks of January 30 and February 13, 2023 | |||
The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify | |||
components that have been modified, risk-significant components, and operator actions. | |||
Information and documentation needed to support the inspection will also be identified. | |||
Mr. Andy Rosebrook, a Region II Senior Risk Analyst, will support Mr. Carman during the | |||
information-gathering visit to review probabilistic risk assessment data and identify components | |||
to be examined during the inspection. Additionally, during the onsite weeks, time may be | |||
needed on the plant-referenced simulator to facilitate the development of operator action-based | |||
scenarios. | |||
T. Haaf 2 | |||
The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the information-gathering visit. | |||
Please provide the referenced information to the Region II Office by Friday, December 2, 2022. | |||
Additional documents will be requested following the information-gathering visit. The inspectors | |||
will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents | |||
required for inspection preparation. The additional information will be needed in the Region II | |||
office by Friday, January 20, 2023, to support the inspection teams preparation week. During | |||
the information-gathering trip, Mr. Carman will also discuss the following inspection support | |||
administrative details: (1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing | |||
personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection; (2) method of tracking inspector | |||
requests during the inspection; (3) licensee computer access; (4) working space; | |||
(5) arrangements for site access; and (6) other applicable information. | |||
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection | |||
and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document | |||
Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for | |||
Withholding. | |||
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, regarding the | |||
information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Carman at 404-997-4471 or contact | |||
me at 404-997-4506. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
James Baptist, Chief | |||
Engineering Branch 1 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket No. 05000400 | |||
License No. NPF-63 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
Information Request for Shearon Harris | |||
Nuclear Power Plant Comprehensive | |||
Engineering Team Inspection | |||
cc w/ encl: Distribution via LISTSERV | |||
Signed by Baptist, James | |||
on 09/29/22 | |||
ML22271A620 | |||
X SUNSI Review X Non-Sensitive X Publicly Available | |||
Sensitive Non-Publicly Available | |||
OFFICE RII/DRS RII/DRS | |||
NAME P. Carman J. Baptist | |||
DATE 9/27/2022 9/29/2022 | |||
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT | |||
COMPREHENSIVE ENGINEERING TEAM INSPECTION | |||
Please provide the information electronically in .pdf files, Excel, or other searchable format on | |||
CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.). The CDROM (or website) should be indexed and | |||
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. The requested items below, identified with an asterisk (*), | |||
should have a date range from January 1, 2020, until present. | |||
1. *List of modifications to systems, structures or components (SSCs) that are permanent | |||
and field work completed. (For the purpose of this inspection, modifications include | |||
permanent: plant changes, design changes, calculation changes, procedure changes, and | |||
set point changes.) | |||
The list should contain the number of the modification, a short description, affected system | |||
and unit. If multiple categories/stages of modifications exist, provide a description of the | |||
types relative to the coding scheme in your transmittal. Additionally, the list should be | |||
categorized by quality level (i.e., safety or non-safety) as well as whether accompanied by | |||
a screening or 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation. A query report return-field-set might look like: | |||
Identifier Unit System1 Description Type2 Status3 QA Condition4 50.595 | |||
1 e.g. If systems are provided with some type of number or acronym designation, | |||
define the systems designation on a separate list or document | |||
2 e.g. Engineering Design/Document Change, Design Change Notice, Test, | |||
Experiment, etc. | |||
3 e.g. Closed, Returned to Operation, Void, Partially Completed, Released for | |||
Installation, Phase 1 Completed, etc. | |||
4 e.g. Safety Related or Non-Safety Related | |||
5 e.g. Screened Out or Full 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation | |||
2. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) excluding external events and | |||
fires: | |||
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by Risk | |||
Achievement Worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance | |||
b. A list of the top 500 cut-sets | |||
c. A list of the top 500 LERF contributors | |||
3. From your most recent PSA including external events and fires: | |||
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW, | |||
and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance | |||
b. A list of the top 500 cut-sets | |||
4. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW and human | |||
reliability worksheets for these items | |||
5. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action | |||
6. *List of components with low-design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow | |||
or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to | |||
rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.) and | |||
associated evaluations or calculations | |||
Enclosure | |||
7. *List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed | |||
8. *List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred | |||
9. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as | |||
described in NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0326, issued September 30, 2019 | |||
10. *List and brief description of Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments | |||
11. *List and reason for equipment that has been classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status | |||
12. *List of equipment on the sites Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a | |||
description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if | |||
available) of your plans to address the issue(s) along with dates added or removed from | |||
the issues list | |||
13. List of current operator work arounds/burdens | |||
14. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report | |||
15. Copy of Technical Specification(s) | |||
16. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases | |||
17. Copy of Technical Requirements Manual(s) | |||
18. Copy of the Quality Assurance Program Manual | |||
19. Copy of Corrective Action Program Procedure(s) | |||
20. Copy of Operability Determination Procedure(s) | |||
21. Copy of procedures addressing the following: Modifications, design changes, set point | |||
changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability analyses, commercial grade dedications, | |||
post-modifications testing, 10 CFR 50.59 screenings and evaluations, and UFSAR updates | |||
22. Copy of procedures addressing the following: loss of service water system or ultimate heat | |||
sink (UHS); controls to prevent clogging due to macrofouling; and performance, testing, | |||
and inspection requirements for service water system and UHS | |||
23. Response to Generic Letter 89-13 including any regulatory commitments made | |||
24. List of heat exchangers or equipment cooled by service water directly or indirectly. Include | |||
the risk ranking for each listed heat exchanger. | |||
25. List of motor operated valves and air operated valves in the valve program, and their | |||
associated design margin and risk ranking | |||
26. Primary AC and DC calculations for safety-related buses | |||
27. One-line diagram of electrical plant (Electronic only) | |||
28. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams | |||
29. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (Electronic) | |||
30. Index and legend for P&IDs | |||
31. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating | |||
Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures | |||
2 | |||
32. Copies of corrective action documents generated from previous design bases assurance | |||
inspections | |||
33. Copy of any self-assessments performed, and corrective action documents generated, in | |||
preparation for current comprehensive engineering team inspection | |||
34. Contact information for a person to discuss PSA information prior to and during the | |||
information-gathering trip (Name, title, phone number, and e-mail address) | |||
3 | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 03:40, 16 November 2024
ML22271A620 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Harris |
Issue date: | 09/29/2022 |
From: | James Baptist NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1 |
To: | Haaf T Duke Energy Progress |
References | |
IR 2023010 | |
Download: ML22271A620 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000400/2023010
Text
September 29, 2022
Mr. Thomas Haaf
Site Vice President
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
5413 Shearon Harris Road
Mail Code HNP01
New Hill, NC 27562-9300
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
COMPREHENSIVE ENGINEERING TEAM INSPECTION - U.S. NUCLEAR
REGULATORY COMMISSION INSPECTION REPORT 05000400/2023010
Dear Mr. Haaf:
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Region II staff will conduct a Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection (CETI) at your
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant during the weeks of January 30 and February 13, 2023.
Mr. Paul Carman, a Senior Reactor Inspector from the NRCs Region II office, will lead the
inspection team. The inspection will be conducted in accordance with Inspection Procedure 71111.21M, Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection (CETI). This is a new procedure
that has not been issued yet, but it is anticipated that it will be issued by December 31, 2022.
The inspection will evaluate the capability of components that have been modified and risk-
significant/low-margin components to function as designed and to support proper system
operation. The inspection will also include a review of selected operator actions, and operating
experience, and modifications.
During a telephone conversation on September 26, 2022, with Ms. Sarah McDaniel, we
confirmed arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the two-week onsite
inspection. The schedule is as follows:
Information-gathering visit: Week of December 12, 2022
Onsite weeks: Weeks of January 30 and February 13, 2023
The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify
components that have been modified, risk-significant components, and operator actions.
Information and documentation needed to support the inspection will also be identified.
Mr. Andy Rosebrook, a Region II Senior Risk Analyst, will support Mr. Carman during the
information-gathering visit to review probabilistic risk assessment data and identify components
to be examined during the inspection. Additionally, during the onsite weeks, time may be
needed on the plant-referenced simulator to facilitate the development of operator action-based
scenarios.
T. Haaf 2
The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the information-gathering visit.
Please provide the referenced information to the Region II Office by Friday, December 2, 2022.
Additional documents will be requested following the information-gathering visit. The inspectors
will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents
required for inspection preparation. The additional information will be needed in the Region II
office by Friday, January 20, 2023, to support the inspection teams preparation week. During
the information-gathering trip, Mr. Carman will also discuss the following inspection support
administrative details: (1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing
personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection; (2) method of tracking inspector
requests during the inspection; (3) licensee computer access; (4) working space;
(5) arrangements for site access; and (6) other applicable information.
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection
and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document
Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for
Withholding.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, regarding the
information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Carman at 404-997-4471 or contact
me at 404-997-4506.
Sincerely,
James Baptist, Chief
Engineering Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 05000400
License No. NPF-63
Enclosure:
Information Request for Shearon Harris
Nuclear Power Plant Comprehensive
Engineering Team Inspection
cc w/ encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
Signed by Baptist, James
on 09/29/22
X SUNSI Review X Non-Sensitive X Publicly Available
Sensitive Non-Publicly Available
OFFICE RII/DRS RII/DRS
NAME P. Carman J. Baptist
DATE 9/27/2022 9/29/2022
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
COMPREHENSIVE ENGINEERING TEAM INSPECTION
Please provide the information electronically in .pdf files, Excel, or other searchable format on
CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.). The CDROM (or website) should be indexed and
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. The requested items below, identified with an asterisk (*),
should have a date range from January 1, 2020, until present.
1. *List of modifications to systems, structures or components (SSCs) that are permanent
and field work completed. (For the purpose of this inspection, modifications include
permanent: plant changes, design changes, calculation changes, procedure changes, and
set point changes.)
The list should contain the number of the modification, a short description, affected system
and unit. If multiple categories/stages of modifications exist, provide a description of the
types relative to the coding scheme in your transmittal. Additionally, the list should be
categorized by quality level (i.e., safety or non-safety) as well as whether accompanied by
a screening or 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation. A query report return-field-set might look like:
Identifier Unit System1 Description Type2 Status3 QA Condition4 50.595
1 e.g. If systems are provided with some type of number or acronym designation,
define the systems designation on a separate list or document
2 e.g. Engineering Design/Document Change, Design Change Notice, Test,
Experiment, etc.
3 e.g. Closed, Returned to Operation, Void, Partially Completed, Released for
Installation, Phase 1 Completed, etc.
4 e.g. Safety Related or Non-Safety Related
5 e.g. Screened Out or Full 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation
2. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) excluding external events and
fires:
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by Risk
Achievement Worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
b. A list of the top 500 cut-sets
c. A list of the top 500 LERF contributors
3. From your most recent PSA including external events and fires:
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW,
and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
b. A list of the top 500 cut-sets
4. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW and human
reliability worksheets for these items
5. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action
6. *List of components with low-design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow
or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to
rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.) and
associated evaluations or calculations
Enclosure
7. *List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed
8. *List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred
9. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as
described in NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0326, issued September 30, 2019
10. *List and brief description of Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments
11. *List and reason for equipment that has been classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status
12. *List of equipment on the sites Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a
description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if
available) of your plans to address the issue(s) along with dates added or removed from
the issues list
13. List of current operator work arounds/burdens
14. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report
15. Copy of Technical Specification(s)
16. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases
17. Copy of Technical Requirements Manual(s)
18. Copy of the Quality Assurance Program Manual
19. Copy of Corrective Action Program Procedure(s)
20. Copy of Operability Determination Procedure(s)
21. Copy of procedures addressing the following: Modifications, design changes, set point
changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability analyses, commercial grade dedications,
post-modifications testing, 10 CFR 50.59 screenings and evaluations, and UFSAR updates
22. Copy of procedures addressing the following: loss of service water system or ultimate heat
sink (UHS); controls to prevent clogging due to macrofouling; and performance, testing,
and inspection requirements for service water system and UHS
23. Response to Generic Letter 89-13 including any regulatory commitments made
24. List of heat exchangers or equipment cooled by service water directly or indirectly. Include
the risk ranking for each listed heat exchanger.
25. List of motor operated valves and air operated valves in the valve program, and their
associated design margin and risk ranking
26. Primary AC and DC calculations for safety-related buses
27. One-line diagram of electrical plant (Electronic only)
28. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams
29. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (Electronic)
30. Index and legend for P&IDs
31. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating
Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures
2
32. Copies of corrective action documents generated from previous design bases assurance
inspections
33. Copy of any self-assessments performed, and corrective action documents generated, in
preparation for current comprehensive engineering team inspection
34. Contact information for a person to discuss PSA information prior to and during the
information-gathering trip (Name, title, phone number, and e-mail address)
3