ML17325B526

Rev 0 to Cook Nuclear Plant Restart Plan.

ML17325B526
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	03/07/1998
From:	Sampson J INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:
Shared Package
ML17325B525	List: ML17325B524 ML17325B526 ML17325B527
References
PROC-980307, NUDOCS 9904130177
Download: ML17325B526 (44)

Text

Cook Nuclear Plant Restart Plan

~>> /9t Revision 0 S. R. Sampson Site Vice-President 9904130177 990405 PDR ADQCK 050003'L5 P POR

0 ok Noclear Plant Restart Plan

1. Introduction and Overview 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Background 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities 1.4 Cook Nuclear Plant Restart Piocess Overview

2. Restart Work Scope Determination 2.1 Restart Work Scope Determination Process 2.2 Plant System Reviews 2.3 Redefined Restart Work Scope 3... Restart Work Scope Performance 3.1 Work Scope Performance Restart Readiness Assessmeat 4.1 System Reidiness 4.2 Functional Arei Readiness 4.3 Programmatic Readiness 4.4 Containment Raidiness 5., Restart Authorization 5.1 Restart Oversight Committee(ROC) Review and Approval 5.2 Senior Matutger Review Team (SMRT) Review and Approval 5.3 Executive Vice Presideat Restart Authorization

6. Startup and Power Ascension 6.1 Managemeat Oversight and Organizational Support 6.2 OperatinS Pro6cieacy and Experieace Review Attachments:

A system engineer review board (SERB) charter B restart oversight committee (ROC) charter C criteria for work included in restart scope D plant systems to be reviewed by ROC E restart process map

1.0 Introduction and Overview 1.1 Purpose The Cook Nuclear Plant Restart Plan describes the activities and controlsls that wi will be implemented to ensure the facility is ready to safely start up and operate in an event free manner. . T To provi'd e us with wi the assurance that this can be accomplished we.m ust determine that our people, plant and programs areeread ready to meet this is challenge. The plan will assess these areas and identify any need ceded action to ensure we can safely startup and operate reliably in an event free manner.

The plan will assess the following:

People Have we adequately prepared our people such that they are trained on the changes d ed es and understand the issues involved in restarting and operating the plant? Are the functional areas staffed, organized and functioning at a 1 eve 1 to suppo rt s afe startup and reliable operation in an event free manner?

Programs Have our programs procedures been adjusted to include the lessons learned?

and proc ams an Are they adequate to allow us'to return to operation and prevent future nonconforming conditions?

Plant

're our materie con dition,i 'o configurations, restart readiness of systems and abihty to meet design function while complying with applicab e regu ations equa allow us to return to service?

This plan provides a map to conduct the assessments needed to assure ourselves ead estab The actions and activities needed to do this and any corrective actions willbe performed in accordance with approv roved p rocedures.

ures.

1.'2 Bachgjroaad Duri th Jul - September, 1997, time&arne, the NRC conducted an architect en 'nspection at Cook Nuclear Plant The AE inspection focused the core during a design basis accident. As a conservative measure, bo units were shut down on September 9 and cooled to cold shut down until this question could be properly answered.

On Septem er, tember 12 thee.NRC concluded the AE inspection with a public exit meeting. Following this meeting, Cook Nuclear Plantt commi committed to addressing and resolving seven {7) specific issues identified during thee iins pecti'on p rior to restart o the units. It was believed that these seven issues could be resolved within a few 1 to the NRC committing to these actions, the NRC issued a confirmatory action letter {CAL)identifying their approv wou e required prior to restarung the 'ts. Thee ii4RC CAL also identified two additional th units.

actions to be taken as a condition for resorting the units.

The unit 2 reactor was sc heduled for a refueling to begin in late September, 1997.

The unit 2 core was wi withia weeks of normal burn up window at the time o f thee

'a two wee uasccheduled u sshut down. Our objecnve was to resolve the CAL items, items an restart and res unit 2 for the remaining two weeks of fuel burn up, then commence the refueling outage.

Over the next several weeks, it became apparent that a restart would not be achievable in th e near term, and an a decision was made to begin the unit 2 refueling outage andd its sscheduled wo work on October 20, 1997. In parallel with the outage work, our organization worked through the many AE ias iaspectio'on/CAL issues. It appeared that a January 1998 restart of both units would be feasible.

e, Durin the time period of January - February 1998, the Cook Nuclear Plant senior management team had several meetings wi an e ution.. It was during this time period that several new issues arose, nearing reso luti concerning or re atmg 1 tin to our cocontainment systems that would require signifiicant resources and focus to recoacile.

Given th 'gaif t period the sigaizicaat peri that both units had been shut down up to this point, and the uncertainty for a near-tenn start up date, it was decided that e scope o o es needed to be revaluated, and a more rigorous assessment of plant readiness was required prior to any restart. These steps access ary in order to

're achieve the objectives described in Section 1.1. The key factors that led to this decision are:

Design basis concerns aad equipmeat performance 'ssues which testiag 'ad i~

have come to 1 ght in recent moaths mo raised the concern that additional hardware

'xteaded and non-hardware activities may need to be completed during ttus extead shut down.

Coafirmatioa is required that procedure inadequacies or equipment deficieacies that may challenge plant operators during normal, abaorm abnormal ot emergency erg conditions have been adequately identified and addressed.

integnexl in gn 1

assessment of readiness to restart following o 'n ed Gom other nuc)ear utilities in the implementation of an an extended shutdown

period are being adopted and applied to Cook Nuclear Plant on a pilot basis during this outage.

1.3 Roles and Responsibilities Roles and responsibilities for the execution of this plan are as follows:

1.3.1 All Nuclear Generation Employees Responsible for supporting the restart activities by focusing on safe d ti uous improvement. All employees are obligated to raise any and all quality concerns to management's action through u thee corrective action program.

1.3.2 System Engineers Responsible for success&I completion of restart work on selected systems, safe, reliable power operations, implementing necessary corrective actions and providing af5rmation of readiness.

1.3.3 System Engineering Review Board (SERB)

Board internal to the engmeering organization res ponsible for assessing the readiness of plant systems 1 and providing stems an provi recommendations for additional restart scope to the ROC. The SERB charter is provided in attachment A.

'1.3.4 Restart Oversight Committee (ROC) .

Responsible for determining the restart scope of work using consistent standards and criteria approved by the senior management review team (SMRT) and assessing the readiness of Cook Nuclear Plant to restart and resume power operations, using the process approved by the SMRT in this procedure. The ROC charter is ptovided in attacluneat B.

Senior Management Review Team (SMRT)

'.3.5 Members: Site Vice Ptesident (Chairman)

Vice President Nuclear Engineering Director Performance Assurance

'hdependent Safety Review Committee Member

'This member will actively participate as available, and will perform a continuous overs 1'ght got fo e.. Routine communication with this member may 1

be accomplished through review of meeting minutes, phone conferencing and follow up interviews with the SMRT members.

The SMRT is responsible for generation and approvals of:

{a) criteria for screening work items required for completion of restart; (b) monitoring and oversight of the process for affirmation and approval of plant and staff readiness for restart.

1.3.6 Plant Manager, Engineering Managers and D artment Superintendents Departm Responsibility for success&1 completion of the restart work, performing an reliable power operations, implementing necessary corrective actions and providing aKrmation of readiness to the ROC.

1.3.7 Restart Manager Responsibility for the management and control of restart work activities including the scheduling of activities and coordination of resources.

1.3.8 Site Vice President Overa0 respons>>

res nsibilityi foror the management and implementation of the restart p lan an to achieve the purpose described m section 1.1. Serves as chairman of the(SMRT).

1.3.9 Executive Vice President Nuclear Geaeration Res ponsible for authorizing startup and power ascension, and providmg senior management oversight of the restart process.

1A Cook Nuclear Plant Re>tart Process Overview'he restart plan consists of the following major activities:

(1) scope determination (2} work performance (3) readiness assessment (4) startup authorization (5) startup and power asceM ion Following is a process map an d summarysumm of the activities with more detailed information presented in later sections of this document.

0 Cook Plant Restart Plan Overview II age enfant I~ te XI aeelert aerreerp tacit I 1 l opireeerre approve Restart Work Psrtorm Restart Work Pertorm F mal RIN>>w lteatart An>

pcrkrm Gxaarnmerl Rrprtsre

0 Restart Readiness A~sse sments The objective of the restart readiness assessment is to ensure that the integrated set of plant equipment, human resources and work programs are capable of supporting safe and reliable 1.1 Sye Engr'~ power operations. The restart readiness assessment will be the execution and completion of restart I

initiated in parallel with Perform System work.

Readiness Reviews The restart readiness assessment will focus on the following 1,2 i M argon Perform Functional plant system readiness Area Readiness functional area readiness Reviews ~ ptogrammatic readiness e containment readiness 1.3 Managera Perform Programmatic Readiness Reviews 1A Oir Pient Engineenng Perform Containment Readiness Reviews 1.$ SERB The restart work scope may be increased as a result of the plant system assessments or other ongoing work. The system Recommend Restart engineers will recommend the restart work scope to the System Work Scope Engineer Review Board {SERB).

16 ROC All restart scope additions will be approved by the Restart Oversight Comminee (ROC).

Approve Restart Work  !

Scope 2.t Restart Mareger Following determination of the restart work scope by the ROC, the restart manager is responsible for coordinating the planning,

'erform Restart Work scheduling and completion of the work.

3.1 ROC, PNSRC Results of the restart assessment will be presented to the Restart Oversight Committee (ROC) with an affirmation by the

. Perform Final Review responsible system engineer or engineering manager, and the Recommend Startup functional area superintendent of the readiness of the system or organization to support plant startup and safe, reliable power 0 perafions.

SMRT Following presentation and acceptance of the assessment results by the ROC, the Site Vice President will convene the SMRT to perform an integrated review of the affirmations, verify Recommend Restart compliance with regulatory commitments and any other special criteria that may impact the initiation of startup activities.

4.2 Exec Vrce Prea Based on the results of this review, the Executive Vice President Nuclear Engineering wi0 authorize startup and power ascension.

Authorize Restart 5.1 OPS Startup and power ascension following the completion of startup work will follow a deliberate and ctmtrulied approach that ensures Startup and Power operational and personnel safety. The normal startup process Ascension defined in Cook Nuclear Plant procedures willbe supplemented with appropriate management oversight and support fiom engineering and maintenance organization such that issues or concerns are promptly addressed and the startup can be accomplished in a safe, contmlled manner.

2.0 Restart cwork Scope Determination 2.1 Restart Work Scope Determination Process Th ereestart wwork scope is being defined through a determination process driven by the ROC consistent with their charter. Outstanding work items an se programmatic issues are reviewed against defined criteria to determine which items should be included in the restart scope. System engineers have the largest role in b there is also considerable involvement from other organizations including operations, design engineering, and maintenance. The restart work sco P e determination process is outlined in attachment E.

2.2 Plant System Review Plant systems are reviewed by the system engineer using the plant system review instructions with results and recommendations presented to the ROC.

The plant system review process consists of four primary elements as described below 2.2.1 Selection of Plant Systems Plant systems have been selected for a detailed review and afFirmation based on the historical performance and risk significance of the system.

readiness review instructions. Results of the assessment of selected systems will be esented Gr3t to the SERB and, upon approval, to the ROC with appropriate recommendations for additional actions to bee ~ormed after restart The systems are listed in attachment D.

Th remaining systems will be assessed and evaluated as part of the hne responsibility of the engineering organization through the use of the Issues that afFect restart scope on these systems willbe presented to the ROC on a case basis.

2.2.2 Restart Work Scope Additions The restart work scope addition for plant systems is focu.ied on those items not already included in the restart work scope. Items already scheduled for letio prior to restart are not evaluated agiunst the criteria provided in attachment C unless there is a proposal to delete them. The go o system review and wt,rk scope addition process is to define the work necessary for completion prior to restart such that the system is capable of supporting safe and reliable power operation. This review ew will include the following:

0

(a) the magnitude, significance and risk of items which will be resolved after restart should be defined and evaluated; (b) assurance that recurring problems on the system that could aff'ect safe and reliable operations are being fixed;

{c) assurance that any design basis and licensing issues on the system are being addressed within a time frame that is appropriate for the issue; and (d) assurance that operators will not be unnecessarily challenged in'he operation of the system during normal, abnormal, or emergency conditions.

Based on the review of open work items against the criteria presented in attachment C, the system engineer is to provide recommen'dations for the restart scope changes for the selected systems in attachment D to the SERB

-and upon approval to the ROC. Items recommended for addition to the restart scope for remaining plant systems willbe handled on an item specific basis by the ROC following an initial review by line management It should be noted that it was not the intent of this program to resolve all design basis issues. We are committed to a long range program to accomplish this resolution."

n 2.2.3 Monitoring Restart Work, Addressing Emergent Issues and Performing a More Detailed Assessment of System Readiness, System engineering is to monitor the progress of work on assigned system and address emergent issues as required. Any major restart scope impacts defined by emergent issues should be brought to the ROC following line management review. Allother emergent issues are assessed daily by the engineermg managers.

Also, the system engineer is to use this period to complete the assessment and evaluation of system readiness in preparation for the final system readiness review and affirmation of readiness for restart 2.2.4 Final System Readiness Review and Affirmation This aspect of the system readiness review process is summarized in section 4.1. Although it is not expected that any significant restart work scope issues will be identified during this final review, ifany are identified, they are to be brought to the immediate attention of the ROC {followingline management review).

10

0 0

22 Redefined Restart Work Scope The restart work scope may be redefined based on the evaluation process described above. Decisions made by the ROC regarding the restart work scope are documented in meeting minutes and work item status is tracked.

3.0 Restart Work Scope Performance 3.1 Work Scope Performance Following determination of the restart work scope by the ROC, the restart manager is responsible for coordinating the planning, scheduling and completion of the work, including the implementation of programmatic changes. The restart work scope performance process is outlined in attachment E.

4.0 Restart Readiness Assessment The restart readiness assessment is an integrated line managemeat assessment that assists station management in det 'ng etermining the readiness to initiate startup and achieve safe, reliable power operation through thee next n operating cycle. Thc restart readiness assessmeat process isoutlined inattaciunentE. Thisformofassessmeatisoneelemeato tofaa comprehensive plant assessment program that is the foundation of our continuous h'1 h . Implementation of this action is consistent with the experience and lessons learned of othe'nuclear utilities. The restart readiness assessmea g implemented at Cook Nuclear Plant based on lessons learned and willbe captured such that this process can be implemented on a routine basis in thc future.

The restart readiness assessmeat for restart will verify the co m p letioa of a!1 defined restart operations. Results of thc asscssmeat and afRmation of readiness will be presented to the supervisor. Following acceptance by thc ROC, thc site vice president will convene an SMRT meeting to review these a6irmations aad vaify compliaace '. regulatory coaunrtmeats an d any other applicable criteria The site vice presideat will recommead start up of the units based on this review, and assuaiacc rcgardiag the readiness o statioa to iaitiate startup and safely, reliably operate though the next olxriting cycle.

Following is a summary of the key elements of the program.

4.1 System Readiness System readiness a6irmations by thc system engineer are to confirm that plant systems meeteet functional desiga requiremeats, have beea suitably tested'and as@

ready to support safe and reliable startup and operation through the next c ycle. This aQirmation is based on thc work completed as described in section 2.2, and is to

include a coordinated system walkdown of the system with operations and maintenance personnel on systems defined by the plant engineering manager.

%here necessary, compensatory actions for reschedu ed work 1 w r or other areas of performance risk are to be defined and addressed.

S ystem read' iness affirmations are to be presented by'he system engineer to the SERB and upon its approval to the ROC for the systems identifi Affirmation of system readiness is documented with the signature of the system engineer an d manage'r.'. Affirmation um of individual system readiness for the remaining plant systems wi'll b e addressed as part of the system engineering line management responsi 'b'1' i ity an wi'll be one element of the functional area readiness evaluation.

4.2 Functional Area Readiness

'ss Functional area readiness b y selected se functional areas is an affirmation that the d artment is in an appropriate state of readiness to support startup startu an and ssafee an and reliable power operation throu gh th e next cycle. Functional area readiness wi0 include items such as:

(a) adequacy of sta8iag levels, personnel expcnence and q~ications to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements and commitments; (b) completion of personnel training on normal startup evaluations, po wer ascension requirements, industry operating experienc including extended shutdown and unusual events at similar plants, emergency preparedness, changes in plant configuration, changes in plant operating and emergency procedures, and changes in key administrative procedures and processes; (c) resolution of significant performance deficiencies and reduction of backlogs (corrective action, corrective maintenance etc. ) to manageable levels; and (d) establishment of goals and priorities for the continued improvement of the department including use of critical assessment methods.

Functional Area readiness willbe a6irmcd to the ROC by the folhwing functional

~ opcfatioIs outage management

~ licensing plant cngtncenng - fuels

~ design cngHlccnng plant pmtecnon

~

p roduction uc engineerin information managemen man ent

~ chemistry plant performance assurance radiation pmtectioa Affirmation of functional area readiness is documented with the signaturecof o thee functional area manager.

12

43 Programmatic Readiness Pro ammatic readiness review will confirm that programs are in place to support identification and correction of problems. Program the unit shutdown have been evaluated and necessary corrective or preventive h b m leted. Programs in place at the time of unit start-up will ensure that the plant will be operated in conformance with its desi esign bases and in accordance with the AEP quality assurance prOgra.

A/E prograinmatic issues potential bypass of 50.59 safety evaluations 50.59 safety evaluation quality corrective action program improvements surveillance program assessment 4.4 Containment Readiness the review will focus on the system materiel condition, adequate surveillance testing, and the system configuration contro .

5.0 Restart Authorization The restart authorization process is outlined in attachment E.

5.1 Restart Oversight Committee (ROC) Review <<nd Ap proval The ROC wi will review and accept the assessment affirmatioas in 4.1 4.,4.3 and

'ons 4.4. A restart recommendation willbe made to the SMRT based as on the results of the functional area assessments.

5D . Senioc Mana~a Review Team (SMRQ Review and Approval U review and acceptance of the assessment affirmations in 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 revi by the ROC, the site vice president will convene an SMRT meeting meetin to orm an integrated review and approval.

5B Ereeudve Vice President Restart Authorization Based on this review the executive vice president nuclear generation will provide the authorization for restart and power ascension.

13

6.0 Startttp and Power Ascension Startup and power ascension, following the completion of th the restart work will follow a I'b er ateean d ei and controlled approach that ensures operational and personnel safety. The normal startup management team will be augmented with a shiA plan t man m ag er and shift h that es or concerns are promptly addressed and the status can be accomplished in a safe, controlled manner. The startup and power ascension actions summarized in this section do not change o. alter any requirements of the startup procedures defined above.

6.1 Management Oversight and Organizational Support The Cook Nuclear Plant management structure will be supplemented with a shift plant manager an d s hift'ngineeria eeriag manager to compliment the shift maintenance manager durin during th e startup an power ascension phase. The responsibilities of tartup and these positions are as follows:

6.1.1 Shift Plaat Manager Thc shift plant manager provides on-shift {24-hour) presence as a direct representative of thc plant maaager and is responsible for maintaining aa overall perspective of the startup pmcess. Ifnecessaty, the shift plant manager is authorized to request operations to delay thc startup, reduce power, or shutdown to make necessary repatrs.

6.1.2 Shift Engineering Manager Thc shift eagiaeering manager provides on-shift (24-hour) presence as a direct representative of the plant engineering manager aad is responsible for maintaining an overall perspective of engineering support of thc startup process. The shift engineerin manager will coatrol on-shift engineering resources as accessary to support scheduled startup testing activities, resolve emergent operability issues, support maintenance aad maaage necessary reactor caginecriag test activities.

6.1.3 Shift Maintenance Manager The shift maiateaancc manalpr provides on-shift (24-hour) presence as a direct repf esca tativcc 0of the maintenance manager and is responsible for maintaining an overall perspective of maintcnaace support of thec startu p Th shift aiateaaace manager will coatrol on-shift maintenance resources as necessary to support scheduled startup testing activities, resolve emergent equipmeat issues, and support operations.

14

This organization will be implemented as directed by the plant manager at cnncal evolutions during startup such as change to mode 4, initial cri 'ty, and parallel to grid. The organization will be disbanded as directed by the plant manager but not before mode 4 to 30% power.

6.2 Operating Proficiency and Ezperience Review To minimize the potential for performance errors during the plant startup, the following actions will be taken:,

operations personnel will utilize the simulator to practice the startup evolution and ensure understanding and proficiency with applicable startup procedures and special requirements; a review of past Cook Nuclear Plant startup issues relevant industry operating experience will be performed during the functional area r'eviews to ensure understanding of past experience and lessons learned; department communication meetings will be conducted with each plant department to discuss management expectations regarding the startup and power ascension processes, schedule, and responsibilities. These meetings willbe completed prior to initiating the startup evolution.

15

SYSTEM ENGINEERING REVKW BOARD SERB CHARTER PURPOSE: Perform a system-based, multi-disciplinary technical review of potential restart issues associated with risk significant plant equipment. This board will ensure consistent application of the restart criteria contained in Attachment C of the Cook Nuclear Plant Restart Plan among system engineers, and ensure that restart decisions reflect the shared concerns of Operations, Maintenance and Engineering. The result of this review will be to define the equipment related work which is needed to ensure a safe and event free startup and achieve a reliable post startup operating cycle.

MEMBERS:

Director Plant Engineering (Chair)

Mechanical Component Manager Electrical System Manager.

Safety and Analysis Manager IAC Manager Performance Testing Manager Board Secretary Non-Member: Additional attendance by members of Restart Oversight Committee is expected to reinforce expectations and provide oversight'for the restart Issue review process.

Alternate chair: Site Engineering hfanagers Alternate safety and analysis manager: Engineers in the Safety and Analysis Section, subject to acceptance of the SERB chair or alternate chair.

qUORUM: Chur(orat a~e), t O ite M~~~, Se~ and A Vy is M ger(or alternate), and Secretiiry.

16

ACTIONS:

Review all potential restart items identified by System Engineers based on criteria defined in the restart plan; the System Engineer will present the ed t s for discussion. A representative of Operations and Maintenance knowledgeable of the system's restart issues wi suppo e t

system engineer and ensure the perspective of the other produ'ction groups

'd ed. The 0 erations representative will normally be an SS or a US of the Operations crew responsible for the system, but can bee an SS assigned to the Work Control Center.

Designate systems that are required to be presented to the SERB by system engineer, Maintenance and Operations.

The SERB will review aH items identified as potential restart issues by the system engineer system readiness review. The system engineer, Operations or Maintenance representatives will also identify other issues which are not identified as potential restart issues but may be questioned.

A complete list of open issues on each system will be available during meetings. Thc SERB will review and question additional items as 'ERB desired to determine if they should be restart issues.

Ensure a record of all decisions and concerns raised by the SERB review is documented for future review.

As a result of the review, recommend specific potential restart items for approval by the ROC.

Review and approve the charter and any revisions needed to support the restart plan. Disband this board after startup when directed by thc Site Vice President.

D. R. Hafer Direaor of Hact Engneahg 1'7

ATTACHMENTB RE TARTOVERSI HTCOiViGTTEE ROC CHARTER PURPOSE:. Exercise management oversight and approval of physical and programmatic work scope necessary to ensure a safe and uneventful unit startup, and achieve a reliable operating cycle.

MEMBERS:

Position Alternate Plant Manager, Chair Doug Cooper Bob Gillespie Operations Superintendent Vice Chair Bob Gillespie Guy Tollas Production Engineering Director Ken Baker Alberto Verteramo Plant Engineering Director Don Hafer Mike F inissi Maintenance Superintendent John Boesch Mark Stark Licensing Manager Mark Ackerman Gordon Arent Chemistry Superintendent Dave Morey Bob Claes Radiation Protection Superintendent Doug Noble Paul Holland Manager'ecretary'rimary Training Superintendent Dennis Dennis Willemin Loope Restart Manager John Stubblefield Dick Strasser Restart Plan Project Phil Gora Betty Clark. Sandy McClintock

'hdicates non-voting member3 QUORUM Chairperson or vice chairperson, and three (3) additional voting members, two of which must be primary members. Attendance trom Performance Assurance and Business Performance is strongly encouraged to perfotm an active oversight role.

ACTIONS:

Set and communicate expectations for the organization to evaluate work items against the restart scope criteriL .

Ensure screetnng criteria are consistently applied via the restart oversight committee review, meeting and approval process.

18

Some items that meet one or more of the criteria may be deferred until aher restart ifthere is special consideration that provides the basis for this decision. Examples may include items that are only a concern during certain seasons, reduced risk of performing the work during a system outage, or implementation of adequate compensatory actions until a long-term solution is defined. A clear basis for deferral of these items is to be provided.

Review and approve:

A. Restart action items to be completed prior to startup.

B. Station readiness to initiate until startup and power ascension as determined by the results of the assessment of readiness to start up.

4. Maintain a record of presentations, discussions, deliberations and basis for decisions and recommendations.

Review charter as necessary to accommodate changing conditions.

Convene as necessary to accomplish this charter prior to and during startup.

Disband after unit startup when directed by the site vice president.

J/v /97 Site > President Date 19

ATTACI.IMENTC ITKRIA FOR WORK IN LUDED IN RESTARTS OPE To be included in the plant restart work scope, items must meet the following criteria:

Level 1 Screenin: Resolves an immediate industrial or nuclear safety issue. These issues will be mandatory restart items.

~ Necessary to address the voluntary shutdown for the A/E inspection and related programmatic issues.

~ Necessary to address the confirmatory action letter.

Required to return an INOPERABLE system, subsystem or component to OPERABLE status.

o Required to resolve an immediate industrial or nuclear safety concern.

l~d' N issues h ai 'd '6 l fW WSRei .Th will be considered for addition to the restart item list based on the review and recommendations of plant engineering, operations, and maintenance ifthe action:

Eliminates an existing component failure, deficiency, or condition that could result in operation in, or entry to, an LCO action statement.

Resolves existing deficiencies or conditions that:

a. would result in failure or inability to perform a required surveillance test during the current outage or the following operating cycle in accordance with the plant technical specifications;

b. would increase the risk to operation for safety associated with performing a surveillance; or

c. would result in the failure to meet a license requirement or a restart commitment to an outside agency.

Restores degraded critical components or conditions that could result in a plant transient, power reduction or shutdown.

Resoh es conditions that have resulted in repetitive safety system or equipment failures.

20

0

'ef Restores licensing b programmauc reviews an d scheduled corrective actions may be completed post-restart wi'th thee proper justification of no safety impact, a sa OPERABILITYdetermination, and appropriate regulatory

'y encies to conforming conditions (extended ato communication).

corrects C 'pment with design basis deficiencies; i.e., deficiencies in ts equipmen saf -related or technical specification equipment not in conformance with and scheduled corrective actions may be completed post-restart -restart wi with Corrects deficiencies in configuration management programs, processes, en 'ering analysis codes, or operating, maintenance, o'r test procedures (documentation deficiencies, which have no safety impact, may be completed post-restart).

'es EliGlink conditions that create a potential for perso nnel radiation o&ctlvl'ty release l or e61uent discharge in excess of limits.

exposure, radioacti 0

Reduces cumulative deficiencies, baddogs'or conditions that, m the are evaluated to have significant negative impact on safety, operability or reliable plant operation. (Not applicable to individual work items).

Approved:

w (ZZ it Vice President 0 z/~kg 21

0 ATTACHMENTD

$ ELE ON F PLANT $ YSTE,'g 120 Vac/CRID Inverters Air Recirculation/Hydrogen Skimmer Auxiliary Feedvrater 250 Vdc Station Batteries Component Cooling Water Containment Containment Spray Control Air ECCS Accumulators ECCS Charging Modes 1, 2, 3/CVCS Kgh-head Injection ECCS RHR ECCS SI Electrical Safety Busses (4000 V/600 V)

Emergency Diesel Generators Essential Service Water Main Steam Non-essential Service Water Plant AirCompressors Reactor Coolant System/RCS Pressure Relief Reactor Protection Systetn/Solid-state Protection/ESFAS 22

A~ XCHMENT E Restart Process Map (1) Restart Work Scope Determination S. ~

1 S Rant Saaescna Solect Plant Syatema Approve Plant Syatoma Porfonn Syatam Add)ttonat Work Scope~ Perform Readtneaa For Rovfow For Rt)vtow Revlowa Roqurad? Aaaoaa ment LS) Rssasssssmasasmsnt J

0 t YES S2 se 6ERS Yot)date )oaat)ng R SERB Revtew And Work Scope Approval Approvo Raatatt Work Scope Addtttone Approved Raatalt Scope Add)tfona S 7 8VS EHOR lsetfotm Work Scope fnsvsfa s'erllxmsnss J2 1 Approved Reatart Work Scope (2 )Restart Work Scope Performance 21 24 M Ost)s Plan Roatatt Work Schodule Reatart Work Conduct Reatatt Work Perform Read)ncaa Aaaa aament Ql) Rsssmsaa Aawssmsna i 1 10

~ ~

e ~ ~ ~

'~/~~y

~ . ~ ~

//g Fj+~~/g Jj

'I gp'~~/gP ggg ~~+~<.

wh

~~/j/

A7" 'HMENTE Restart Process Map ATTACHMENTE Restart Process Map (4) Restart Authorization (5) Power Operation a.s sQrtT 4.4 Sec vao &cadent

~51 Opetsoona Perform Fhel Reedheee Perform Fhal R~ Recommend Reetart Authorize Restart Start v p and Power Revlow Recommend atertup Aacenaron

ATTACHMENT 2 TO AEP:NRC:1260GL COOK NUCLEAR PLANT RESTART PLAN, REVISION 1 APRIL 7, 1998