ML18064A175: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 March 2, 2018 Mr. Ronald J. Land Site Manager Framatome Inc.
 
2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352
March 2, 2018  
 
Mr. Ronald J. Land  
 
Site Manager Framatome Inc.  
 
2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
FRAMATOME INC. - LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW (NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INSPECTION REPORT 70-1257/2018-001)  
FRAMATOME INC. - LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW (NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INSPECTION REPORT 70-1257/2018-001)


==Dear Mr. Land:==
==Dear Mr. Land:==


The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff in our Region II office, the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, and the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response completed a licensee performance review of the Framatome Inc., Richland fuel fabrication facility inspection results and facility performance in conducting NRC-licensed activities. The review covered the period of January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017. The  
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff in our Region II office, the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, and the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response completed a licensee performance review of the Framatome Inc., Richland fuel fabrication facility inspection results and facility performance in conducting NRC-licensed activities. The review covered the period of January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017. The performance of Framatome Inc., was evaluated in the following performance areas: Safety Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, Facility Support, and Other Areas. The enclosure to this letter provides the results of our review and constitutes the basis for establishing the NRC oversight program for your facility.
 
Overall, the staff determined that Framatome Inc., has continued to conduct activities safely and securely and in a manner that protects public health and the environment. Based on our review of activities, no area needing improvement was identified for the areas of Safety Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, Facility Support, and Other Areas. Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct the core inspection program for a Category III Fuel Facility as described in NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 2600 Appendix B, NRC Core Inspection Requirements, for the period of January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. No separate letter will be issued addressing the Safeguards area.
performance of Framatome Inc., was evaluated in the following performance areas: Safety Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, Facility Support, and Other Areas. The enclosure to this letter provides the results of our review and constitutes the basis for establishing the NRC oversight program for your facility.
Unresolved Items (URIs) were opened during the conduct of Temporary Instruction (TI) 2600/015, Evaluation of Licensee Strategies for the Prevention and/or Mitigation of Emergencies at Fuel Facilities. The NRC subsequently issued Generic Letter (GL) 2015-01, Treatment of Natural Phenomena Hazards in Fuel Cycle Facilities (ADAMS Accession No. ML14328A029) to request that licensees submit information to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements regarding the treatment of natural phenomena hazard (NPH) events in the integrated safety analysis (ISA). The NRC conducted an announced inspection during the week of August 29, 2016, in accordance with TI 2600/016, Inspection of Activities Associated with NRC Generic Letter 2015-01 (ML16293A899) to independently verify that the Framatome Inc., response to the GL adequately evaluated NPH events in your facility ISA. In addition, this inspection was used to follow-up with previously identified URIs regarding the treatment of NPH events and to inform of the closure process of NRC GL-2015-01. The NRC concluded that the
Overall, the staff determined that Framatome Inc., has continued to conduct activities safely and securely and in a manner that protects public health and the environment. Based on our review of activities, no area needing improvement was identified for the areas of Safety Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, Facility Support, and Other Areas. Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct the core inspection program for a Category III Fuel Facility as described in NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 2600 Appendix B, "NRC Core Inspection Requirements," for the period of January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. No separate letter will be issued addressing the Safeguards area.  
 
Unresolved Items (URIs) were opened during the conduct of Temporary Instruction (TI) 2600/015, "Evaluation of Licensee Strategies for the Prevention and/or Mitigation of Emergencies at Fuel Facilities.The NRC s ubsequently issued Generic Letter (GL) 2015-01, "Treatment of Natural Phenomena Hazards in Fuel Cycle Facilities" (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14328A029) to request that licensees submit information to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements regarding the treatment of natural phenomena hazard (NPH) events in the integrated safety analysis (ISA). The NRC conducted an announced inspection during the week of August 29, 2016, in accordance with TI 2600/016, "Inspection of Activities Associated with NRC Generic Letter 2015-01" (ML16293A899) to independently verify that the Framatome Inc., response to the GL adequately evaluated NPH events in your facility ISA. In addition, this inspection was used to follow-up with previously identified URIs regarding the treatment of NPH events and to inform of the closure process of NRC GL-2015-01. The NRC concluded that the R. Land 2
 
Framatome Inc., ISA adequately addressed potential hazards as a result of NPH events; therefore, the URIs opened during the conduct of TI 2600/015 were closed during this inspection.


R. Land                                            2 Framatome Inc., ISA adequately addressed potential hazards as a result of NPH events; therefore, the URIs opened during the conduct of TI 2600/015 were closed during this inspection.
The results of our review will be discussed with you at a public meeting on March 21, 2018, via webinar. During the meeting, we request that you discuss your performance in the same areas as those evaluated by the NRC.
The results of our review will be discussed with you at a public meeting on March 21, 2018, via webinar. During the meeting, we request that you discuss your performance in the same areas as those evaluated by the NRC.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of  
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
 
Please refer questions and comments regarding your Licensee Performance Review to Mr. Eric Michel, Chief, Projects Branch 2, by telephone at 404-997-4555.
this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
Please refer questions and comments regarding your Licensee Performance Review to Mr. Eric Michel, Chief, Projects Branch 2, by telephone at 404-997-4555.  
                                                /RA/
 
Mark S. Lesser, Director Division of Fuel Facility Inspection Docket No. 70-1257 License No. SNM-1227
Sincerely,       /RA/ Mark S. Lesser, Director Division of Fuel Facility Inspection Docket No. 70-1257 License No. SNM-1227  


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
Licensee Performance Review
cc:  (See page 3)
R. Land 3
cc:  William L. Doan, Jr., Manager Nuclear Criticality Safety Framatome Inc.
2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Calvin D. Manning, Manager Licensing and Compliance Framatome Inc.
2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Timothy J. Tate, Manager Environmental, Health, Safety & Licensing Framatome Inc.
2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Mike Elsen, Director Office of Radiation Protection Department of Health PO Box 47827 Olympia, Washington  98504-7827 mike.elsen@doh.wa.gov Earl Fordham, Deputy Director Office of Radiation Protection Department of Health 309 Bradley Boulevard, Suite 201 Richland, Washington 99352
ML18064A175  SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE  FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DFFI RII:DFFIRII: DFFINMSS:FCSENMSS:FCSE NMSS:FCSESIGNATURE /RA/  /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /via email/ NAME NPitoniak EMichel GGoff RJohnson MKotzalas CErlanger DATE 2/27/2018 2/27/2018 2/27/2018 2/27/2018 2/27/2018 2/28/2018 E-MAIL COPY?    YES NO      YES NO      YES NO  YES NO    YES NO    YES NO LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR FRAMATOME INC.
ASSESSMENT PERIOD:  JANUARY 1, 2016 TO DECEMBER 31, 2017


The following is a summary of the performance of Framatome Inc., in the conduct of
Licensee Performance Review cc: (See page 3)


NRC-licensed activities.
R. Land                                  3 cc:
PERFORMANCE AREA: SAFETY OPERATIONS
William L. Doan, Jr., Manager Nuclear Criticality Safety Framatome Inc.
 
2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Calvin D. Manning, Manager Licensing and Compliance Framatome Inc.
This area is comprised of plant operations, nuclear criticality safety, and fire protection.  
2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Timothy J. Tate, Manager Environmental, Health, Safety & Licensing Framatome Inc.
2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Mike Elsen, Director Office of Radiation Protection Department of Health PO Box 47827 Olympia, Washington 98504-7827 mike.elsen@doh.wa.gov Earl Fordham, Deputy Director Office of Radiation Protection Department of Health 309 Bradley Boulevard, Suite 201 Richland, Washington 99352


ML18064A175                    SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE      FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE          RII:DFFI          RII:DFFI      RII: DFFI    NMSS:FCSE    NMSS:FCSE    NMSS:FCSE SIGNATURE              /RA/            /RA/          /RA/          /RA/        /RA/      /via email/
NAME                NPitoniak        EMichel        GGoff      RJohnson    MKotzalas    CErlanger DATE                2/27/2018        2/27/2018    2/27/2018      2/27/2018    2/27/2018    2/28/2018 E-MAIL COPY?      YES      NO      YES      NO    YES      NO YES      NO YES      NO  YES      NO LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR FRAMATOME INC.
ASSESSMENT PERIOD: JANUARY 1, 2016 TO DECEMBER 31, 2017 The following is a summary of the performance of Framatome Inc., in the conduct of NRC-licensed activities.
PERFORMANCE AREA: SAFETY OPERATIONS This area is comprised of plant operations, nuclear criticality safety, and fire protection.
Program Areas Needing Improvement
Program Areas Needing Improvement
* One non-cited violation (NCV) was identified during the assessment period. No specific area needing improvement was identified in Safety Operations.
* One non-cited violation (NCV) was identified during the assessment period. No specific area needing improvement was identified in Safety Operations.
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Safety Operations.
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Safety Operations.
PERFORMANCE AREA: SAFEGUARDS This area is comprised of material control and accounting (MC&A), physical protection of special nuclear material, and information security.  
PERFORMANCE AREA: SAFEGUARDS This area is comprised of material control and accounting (MC&A), physical protection of special nuclear material, and information security.
 
Program Areas Needing Improvement
Program Areas Needing Improvement
* No specific area needing improvement was identified in Safeguards.
* No specific area needing improvement was identified in Safeguards.
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Safeguards.
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Safeguards.
PERFORMANCE AREA: RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS This area is comprised of radiation protection, environmental protection, waste management, and transportation.  
PERFORMANCE AREA: RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS This area is comprised of radiation protection, environmental protection, waste management, and transportation.
 
Program Areas Needing Improvement
Program Areas Needing Improvement
* No specific area needing improvement was identified in Radiological Controls.
* No specific area needing improvement was identified in Radiological Controls.
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Radiological Controls.  
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Radiological Controls.
 
Enclosure
Enclosure  
 
2 Enclosure PERFORMANCE AREA:  FACILITY SUPPORT
 
This area is comprised of maintenance and surveillance of safety controls, management organization and controls, operator training, emergency preparedness, emergency exercise evaluation, and permanent plant modifications.


2 PERFORMANCE AREA: FACILITY SUPPORT This area is comprised of maintenance and surveillance of safety controls, management organization and controls, operator training, emergency preparedness, emergency exercise evaluation, and permanent plant modifications.
Program Areas Needing Improvement
Program Areas Needing Improvement
* No specific area needing improvement was identified in Facility Support.
* No specific area needing improvement was identified in Facility Support.
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Facility Support.
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Facility Support.
PERFORMANCE AREA: OTHER AREAS This area is comprised of special issues.  
PERFORMANCE AREA: OTHER AREAS This area is comprised of special issues.
 
Program Areas Needing Improvement
Program Areas Needing Improvement
* One violation was identified during the assessment period. No specific area needing improvement was identified in Other Areas.  
* One violation was identified during the assessment period. No specific area needing improvement was identified in Other Areas.
 
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
Recommended NRC Inspection Effort
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Other Areas.}}
* Maintain the core inspection effort in Other Areas.
Enclosure}}

Latest revision as of 11:45, 3 February 2020

Framatome 2018 Lpr Letter
ML18064A175
Person / Time
Site: Framatome ANP Richland
Issue date: 03/02/2018
From: Lesser B
NRC/RGN-II/DFFI
To: Land R
Framatome
References
IR 2018001
Download: ML18064A175 (6)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 March 2, 2018 Mr. Ronald J. Land Site Manager Framatome Inc.

2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352

SUBJECT:

FRAMATOME INC. - LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW (NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INSPECTION REPORT 70-1257/2018-001)

Dear Mr. Land:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff in our Region II office, the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, and the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response completed a licensee performance review of the Framatome Inc., Richland fuel fabrication facility inspection results and facility performance in conducting NRC-licensed activities. The review covered the period of January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017. The performance of Framatome Inc., was evaluated in the following performance areas: Safety Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, Facility Support, and Other Areas. The enclosure to this letter provides the results of our review and constitutes the basis for establishing the NRC oversight program for your facility.

Overall, the staff determined that Framatome Inc., has continued to conduct activities safely and securely and in a manner that protects public health and the environment. Based on our review of activities, no area needing improvement was identified for the areas of Safety Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, Facility Support, and Other Areas. Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct the core inspection program for a Category III Fuel Facility as described in NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 2600 Appendix B, NRC Core Inspection Requirements, for the period of January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. No separate letter will be issued addressing the Safeguards area.

Unresolved Items (URIs) were opened during the conduct of Temporary Instruction (TI) 2600/015, Evaluation of Licensee Strategies for the Prevention and/or Mitigation of Emergencies at Fuel Facilities. The NRC subsequently issued Generic Letter (GL) 2015-01, Treatment of Natural Phenomena Hazards in Fuel Cycle Facilities (ADAMS Accession No. ML14328A029) to request that licensees submit information to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements regarding the treatment of natural phenomena hazard (NPH) events in the integrated safety analysis (ISA). The NRC conducted an announced inspection during the week of August 29, 2016, in accordance with TI 2600/016, Inspection of Activities Associated with NRC Generic Letter 2015-01 (ML16293A899) to independently verify that the Framatome Inc., response to the GL adequately evaluated NPH events in your facility ISA. In addition, this inspection was used to follow-up with previously identified URIs regarding the treatment of NPH events and to inform of the closure process of NRC GL-2015-01. The NRC concluded that the

R. Land 2 Framatome Inc., ISA adequately addressed potential hazards as a result of NPH events; therefore, the URIs opened during the conduct of TI 2600/015 were closed during this inspection.

The results of our review will be discussed with you at a public meeting on March 21, 2018, via webinar. During the meeting, we request that you discuss your performance in the same areas as those evaluated by the NRC.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Please refer questions and comments regarding your Licensee Performance Review to Mr. Eric Michel, Chief, Projects Branch 2, by telephone at 404-997-4555.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mark S. Lesser, Director Division of Fuel Facility Inspection Docket No. 70-1257 License No. SNM-1227

Enclosure:

Licensee Performance Review cc: (See page 3)

R. Land 3 cc:

William L. Doan, Jr., Manager Nuclear Criticality Safety Framatome Inc.

2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Calvin D. Manning, Manager Licensing and Compliance Framatome Inc.

2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Timothy J. Tate, Manager Environmental, Health, Safety & Licensing Framatome Inc.

2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Mike Elsen, Director Office of Radiation Protection Department of Health PO Box 47827 Olympia, Washington 98504-7827 mike.elsen@doh.wa.gov Earl Fordham, Deputy Director Office of Radiation Protection Department of Health 309 Bradley Boulevard, Suite 201 Richland, Washington 99352

ML18064A175 SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DFFI RII:DFFI RII: DFFI NMSS:FCSE NMSS:FCSE NMSS:FCSE SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /via email/

NAME NPitoniak EMichel GGoff RJohnson MKotzalas CErlanger DATE 2/27/2018 2/27/2018 2/27/2018 2/27/2018 2/27/2018 2/28/2018 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR FRAMATOME INC.

ASSESSMENT PERIOD: JANUARY 1, 2016 TO DECEMBER 31, 2017 The following is a summary of the performance of Framatome Inc., in the conduct of NRC-licensed activities.

PERFORMANCE AREA: SAFETY OPERATIONS This area is comprised of plant operations, nuclear criticality safety, and fire protection.

Program Areas Needing Improvement

  • One non-cited violation (NCV) was identified during the assessment period. No specific area needing improvement was identified in Safety Operations.

Recommended NRC Inspection Effort

  • Maintain the core inspection effort in Safety Operations.

PERFORMANCE AREA: SAFEGUARDS This area is comprised of material control and accounting (MC&A), physical protection of special nuclear material, and information security.

Program Areas Needing Improvement

  • No specific area needing improvement was identified in Safeguards.

Recommended NRC Inspection Effort

  • Maintain the core inspection effort in Safeguards.

PERFORMANCE AREA: RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS This area is comprised of radiation protection, environmental protection, waste management, and transportation.

Program Areas Needing Improvement

  • No specific area needing improvement was identified in Radiological Controls.

Recommended NRC Inspection Effort

  • Maintain the core inspection effort in Radiological Controls.

Enclosure

2 PERFORMANCE AREA: FACILITY SUPPORT This area is comprised of maintenance and surveillance of safety controls, management organization and controls, operator training, emergency preparedness, emergency exercise evaluation, and permanent plant modifications.

Program Areas Needing Improvement

  • No specific area needing improvement was identified in Facility Support.

Recommended NRC Inspection Effort

  • Maintain the core inspection effort in Facility Support.

PERFORMANCE AREA: OTHER AREAS This area is comprised of special issues.

Program Areas Needing Improvement

  • One violation was identified during the assessment period. No specific area needing improvement was identified in Other Areas.

Recommended NRC Inspection Effort

  • Maintain the core inspection effort in Other Areas.

Enclosure