ML19207B509: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:e f e.L.',: It~ _ _ _ ___ __
{{#Wiki_filter:e f
22 June 1979 Florida c s _7 s _'13,3-o-5-m; power Docket No. 50-30J Mr.J. P. O'Reilly, Director License No. DPR-72 Office of Inspection & Enforcement Ref: RI I :T .TMel!
e .   .                                                                              L
l'.S.Suelear Regulatory Comnission 50-302/74-13 101 Marietta St., Suite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30103
: It
                                                                    ~ _ _ _ ___ __
22 June 1979 Florida power                                                    c s _7 s _'13,3-o-5-m; Docket No. 50-30J Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director                                                                     License No. DPR-72 Office of Inspection & Enforcement                                                               Ref:                     RI I :T .TMel!
l'.S. Suelear Regulatory Comnission                                                                           50-302/74-13 101 Marietta St., Suite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30103


==Dear Mr. O ' Re i l l ',==
==Dear Mr. O ' Re i l l ',==
'.i e offer the followin respon"c4 to t hi.
 
appire nt't- m f N c- - c ''
                                                                                                                                    - m f N c- - c ''                    '.-
' . -in the ref erenced Inspec t ion ~:er, rt r NOT I C F OF 'J 1. 'I ..; 1 '.
            '.i e offer the followin                 respon"c4 to t hi.                     appire nt             't in the ref erenced Inspec t ion ~:er, rt             r NOT I C F OF 'J 1. 'I ..; 1 '.
.3.tt -" > r . i r - c'unct - '
i..it
'lechnit .i ! Sp.
                                                                                                              .3. tt -" > r . i r - c'unct - '
i..it A.As requires *
A. As requires *           '   lechnit .i ! Sp.                                                                                                                                         '
'' ' ' tx'~ . e.''.a d e p r o ris'.
                                                      .a d e p r o ris'.           *
' i, i t t. Un ce i-i"r r ? c t d
                                                                                      ' i, i t t         . Un ce i- i"r r ? c t d ' ' ' tx procedures         ~ . e.  ''
*procedures a %~i'r wb ' ' . 'l J 4 ,lant a n.rc . c t-ta!',.i t 1.'eet one
wb ' ' . 'l J 4 a %~i'r
-.eSers o:
                                      ,lant
''' 't hi: s tc dea , t .'r t i;ie r a t > r ' s !; cense
                                      '            a n.rc . c t           -ta!',         .i t 1.'eet one
' 'I C -*it -' ' -Co: trar.t.t'i i5>c s duri t'n.ri;'r i ! .'
                  -.eSers o:                                                                               '       ' '
*'_ , , i ar; chance 4 were maJe te operat i:
dea , t .'r t i;ie r a t > r ' s !; cense             ' '    t hi          :s    tc
Pr. t rJure a P _' 3 i a , "lant t o.
                                                                                            .ri      '             ;'r i ! .'                   _ ,
J-, Proceduri $i . ! , Et f uelir Intern;. Inti
* I C -* it     ,            -' ' -
't-and t,-Surceillant e Enrineered Sate.uard,, withcut p r i .'r apr" '~Plant Response to p l,in t :an gemen t .
t'i     i5   >c s   duri               t'n                     i Pr. t rJure a P _' 3 i a , "lant t o. J-Co: trar.      t.
rertirs oi A.R e sf on st; As stated in Sectien lua of the Detai:s in tht re t t re: cce of about 3F' a temperat ure, Inspec t ion Re;, ort , SP 'il 7 was perforced at between 200 anJ .
ar; chance 4 were maJe te operat i:                                                                                Intern;. Inti                             -
Ae t xp' ti".e J
                                                                                                                                                                                      't and     t,- Surceillant e Proceduri $i . ! , Et f uelir                                                                                apr" '
% 0' r instead of the required tempera'c.re d i s c ove ri ' '. thi ex t "t :
                                                                                                                                                                                      ~
a :' 'to the inspector, when thi, erro; vas t r,- ri condition did not warrant actions necessar- to - tintai- t
Plant Response to Enrineered                               Sate.uard,, withcut p r i .'r rertirs oi p l,in t :an gemen t .
.t e .pe r.it ur e A det ision w.is then ads k t.: ( .' ) v'nr L..si :' m''****!!, ld r!-. ik e.it. i t t i r - t !i. -- i t t'r.ir-.. ' *t-.- . i- : i r-
A. R e sf on st;         As stated in Sectien lua of the Detai:s in tht re                                                                     oft about    t re: cce             3F' Inspec t ion Re;, ort , SP 'il 7 was perforced at a temperat ure,                                                              % 0' r                  Ae t xp' ti".e J instead of the required tempera'c.re between 200 anJ .                                                                                                                  a :' '
.'@ -. I .nt . nd t h i s
to the inspector, when thi, erro; vas d i s c ove ri ' '. thi ex t "t :                                                                     t
: i. t i ...'t-u'rt t h.7. 't i. .. .: s:
                                                                                                                                                                    .      r,             - ri condition did not warrant actions necessar-                                                             to - tintai- t L..
-.A-,t.itc.'u sr. t i. n I t '.
A det ision w.is then ads k t.: ( .' ) v'nr si :' m t e .pe r.it ur e                                                                                      **               *                   *
-."*s i nitr ..-
                  !!, ld r     !-     . ik e   .it   . i t t i r - t !i. -- i t t'r.ir-nt . nd t h i s i. t i . - . i- : i r-                               .'      .
>i.:*."r e,.<Step 7 . .' . 1 '. . I of o l ' .' ' ' u r eqo i r. .'" 7.t-''e t st.i- ci n.. 'nl i t '
                                                                                                                                        . '
' . ' .-stiar . r"c r a t . r -
* t-          .
L t he se.t,r..e.1: r~.t.et t''.ni
                    @ -. I .         .
* r. i t - ' I . i ". * *
                                                                                                                                                                                  .       t-             u'   rt t h.                                 t i. .. .: s:
**opened te- .n t in
A-   ,t.itc.'     u     sr. t i. n I t '.       "
's p ' n r i , t bi Ins :'. ..'-wtt'.i''oi - Jil9..ir..was not app!i.ab!c Ster '..!J,.!''*' ' 'i ; ". ..r.'*plaininr the reason for not p ' a . i n .- ti.
: 7. '              .
'.u:..St ep 7 . .' . l !. . ) of OP
                                                                                                                                          *      "r              e,.<                            s i nitr ..-                     >i.:*.
.'09 h r-been revi.ed t.i''i-:'r.edur.-is: ''!- i ~ n. t r s ., :i r t
Step 7 . .' . 1 '. . I of o l ' .' ' ' u r eqo i r. .'                                       -                              i- ci n.                  " 7               .         t- ''e L t he        se        . 'nl i t '       '.'.               t      .      st.
'to be signed oft it nitroren blanketin.-
stiar . r"c r a t . r -
'tn.3 .'852 084 23o333e og7
1:
(,;6 cm r s ,
* r~.             t.       et       t''.         ni
.., J. P. O'Reilly RII: JMcH/79'-13 f*All concerned personnel have been cautioned that any variance from approved procedures must be implemented by approved procedural controls.
* r. i t - ' I . i ". *
* Ins :'. . t,r          ..e.
opened te- .n t in 's p ' n r i , t bi                                                                         .      .ir..               wtt'             .i Ster '         ..!J,.!
oi - Jil9 was not app!i.ab!c                                                                     '                   '             *     .
i ; ". .     .r.
                                                                                                                  .u:.
plaininr the reason for not p ' a . i n .- ti.                                                         ''                                           edur.                   -is:
St ep 7 . .' . l !. . ) of OP .'09 h r- been revi.ed
: t.       i                 ''i-           :'r.
                                                                                                                                                    - i ~ n. t r s ., :i r t to be signed oft it nitroren blanketin.-                                                       tn             .
3 .'
852 084                                   23o333e og7                                                                       r s
(,;6cm
 
J. P. O'Reilly RII:       JMcH/79'-13                           f All concerned personnel have been cautioned that any variance from approved procedures must be implemented by approved procedural controls.
Compliance has been achieved this date.
Compliance has been achieved this date.
As equired by Technical Specification 4.4.6.2.b, the Reactor Building 3.be monitored at least once per 12 hours.
: 3. As equired by Technical Specification 4.4.6.2.b, the Reactor Building sump inventory and discharge must be monitored at least once per 12 hours.
sump inventory and discharge must Contrary to the above, during the period of April 17-19, 1979, the monitored for a period Reactor Building sump inventory and discharge were not of about thirty-five (35) hours.
Contrary to the above, during the period of April 17-19,monitored  1979, thefor a period Reactor Building sump inventory and discharge were not of about thirty-five (35) hours.
B.Response- It was, at the time of the inspection, and at remains our conten-o nitored as t ion that no violation existed.
B.     Response- It was, at the time of the inspection, and at remains our           conten-as o nitored The Reactor Building cump was t ion that no violation existed.
The Reactor Building cump was required and recorded as "off-scale high" on the s; if t lors for the time as t he surp purn controls span in question, and no discharges were made This was te prevent overflowin; in " pull to lock" configuration.
required and recorded as "off-scale high" on as      thet s; heifsurp t lors for controls purn  the time span in question, and no discharges were This madewas te prevent overflowin; were    in " pull to lock" configuration.
the mistellaneous waste storage tank (WS7 ) whose level was at the iich were alarr point.
the mistellaneous waste storage tank (WS7 ) whose level was at the iich alarr point.
The RCS leakage dete rminat ion does not utilize tha RB sump inventerv and di,charce to calculate the primary system leak rate.
The RCS leakage dete rminat ion does not utilize tha RB sump           inventerv and Therefore, the di,charce to calculate the primary system leak rate.
Therefore, the nanitorinc. of the Rh sump, "off-scale high" neets the surveillance require-ment of Technic al Spec if icat ions.
nanitorinc. of the Rh sump, "off-scale high" neets the surveillance require-ment of Technic al Spec if icat ions.
There were two (2) alternatives to operatine this condition.
There were two (2) alternatives to operatine           this condition. Une was to shat down the plant, which would brce created additienal waste problers, and the other would have been to purp out the sump and overflow thi WST.
Une was to shat down the plant, which would brce created additienal waste problers, and the other would have been to purp out the sump and overflow thi WST.
As neither of these two alternatives was acceptable, it was determined to accept the known high level in the Rh sump and to maintain discharges when spai e was available.
As neither of these two alternatives was acceptable, it was determined to accept the known high level in the Rh sump and to maintain discharges when was available.
Should there be further questions, please contact us.
spai e Should there be further questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours, FLORIDA POWER FORPORATIOS       r
Very truly yours, FLORIDA POWER FORPORATIOS r C_. > . , 0 c + -
                                                      \      C Yt_. > . , 0 c + -
'" g\Yt_g_W.p. Stcwart L Nur I c.sr Pl. int % n.y'c r M.in.lger. Nu lear t'perattons.J L ! r .
g
_g                    _
Nur I c.sr Pl. int % n.y'c r L
W. p. Stcwart M.in.lger. Nu lear t'perattons
          .J L ! r .
852 085 i}}
852 085 i}}

Latest revision as of 07:20, 2 February 2020

Responds to NRC 790531 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-302/79-13.Corrective Actions:Personnel Have Been Cautioned That Variance from Approved Procedures Must Be Implemented by Approved Procedural Controls
ML19207B509
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/22/1979
From: Stewart W
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: Oreilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19207B505 List:
References
NUDOCS 7908300087
Download: ML19207B509 (2)
v • d • e


Text

e f

e . . L

It

~ _ _ _ ___ __

22 June 1979 Florida power c s _7 s _'13,3-o-5-m; Docket No.50-30J Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director License No. DPR-72 Office of Inspection & Enforcement Ref: RI I :T .TMel!

l'.S. Suelear Regulatory Comnission 50-302/74-13 101 Marietta St., Suite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30103

Dear Mr. O ' Re i l l ',

- m f N c- - c '.-

'.i e offer the followin respon"c4 to t hi. appire nt 't in the ref erenced Inspec t ion ~:er, rt r NOT I C F OF 'J 1. 'I ..; 1 '.

i..it

.3. tt -" > r . i r - c'unct - '

A. As requires * ' lechnit .i ! Sp. '

.a d e p r o ris'. *

' i, i t t . Un ce i- i"r r ? c t d ' ' ' tx procedures ~ . e.

wb ' ' . 'l J 4 a %~i'r

,lant

' a n.rc . c t -ta!', .i t 1.'eet one

-.eSers o: ' ' '

dea , t .'r t i;ie r a t > r ' s !; cense ' ' t hi :s tc

.ri '  ;'r i ! .' _ ,

  • I C -* it , -' ' -

t'i i5 >c s duri t'n i Pr. t rJure a P _' 3 i a , "lant t o. J-Co: trar. t.

ar; chance 4 were maJe te operat i: Intern;. Inti -

't and t,- Surceillant e Proceduri $i . ! , Et f uelir apr" '

~

Plant Response to Enrineered Sate.uard,, withcut p r i .'r rertirs oi p l,in t :an gemen t .

A. R e sf on st; As stated in Sectien lua of the Detai:s in tht re oft about t re: cce 3F' Inspec t ion Re;, ort , SP 'il 7 was perforced at a temperat ure,  % 0' r Ae t xp' ti".e J instead of the required tempera'c.re between 200 anJ . a :' '

to the inspector, when thi, erro; vas d i s c ove ri ' '. thi ex t "t : t

. r, - ri condition did not warrant actions necessar- to - tintai- t L..

A det ision w.is then ads k t.: ( .' ) v'nr si :' m t e .pe r.it ur e ** * *

!!, ld r  !- . ik e .it . i t t i r - t !i. -- i t t'r.ir-nt . nd t h i s i. t i . - . i- : i r- .' .

. '

  • t- .

@ -. I . .

. t- u' rt t h. t i. .. .: s:

A- ,t.itc.' u sr. t i. n I t '. "

7. ' .
  • "r e,.< s i nitr ..- >i.:*.

Step 7 . .' . 1 '. . I of o l ' .' ' ' u r eqo i r. .' - i- ci n. " 7 . t- e L t he se . 'nl i t ' '.'. t . st.

stiar . r"c r a t . r -

1:

  • r~. t. et t. ni
  • r. i t - ' I . i ". *
  • Ins :'. . t,r ..e.

opened te- .n t in 's p ' n r i , t bi . .ir.. wtt' .i Ster ' ..!J,.!

oi - Jil9 was not app!i.ab!c ' ' * .

i ; ". . .r.

.u:.

plaininr the reason for not p ' a . i n .- ti. edur. -is:

St ep 7 . .' . l !. . ) of OP .'09 h r- been revi.ed

t. i i-  :'r.

- i ~ n. t r s ., :i r t to be signed oft it nitroren blanketin.- tn .

3 .'

852 084 23o333e og7 r s

(,;6cm

J. P. O'Reilly RII: JMcH/79'-13 f All concerned personnel have been cautioned that any variance from approved procedures must be implemented by approved procedural controls.

Compliance has been achieved this date.

3. As equired by Technical Specification 4.4.6.2.b, the Reactor Building sump inventory and discharge must be monitored at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.

Contrary to the above, during the period of April 17-19,monitored 1979, thefor a period Reactor Building sump inventory and discharge were not of about thirty-five (35) hours.

B. Response- It was, at the time of the inspection, and at remains our conten-as o nitored The Reactor Building cump was t ion that no violation existed.

required and recorded as "off-scale high" on as thet s; heifsurp t lors for controls purn the time span in question, and no discharges were This madewas te prevent overflowin; were in " pull to lock" configuration.

the mistellaneous waste storage tank (WS7 ) whose level was at the iich alarr point.

The RCS leakage dete rminat ion does not utilize tha RB sump inventerv and Therefore, the di,charce to calculate the primary system leak rate.

nanitorinc. of the Rh sump, "off-scale high" neets the surveillance require-ment of Technic al Spec if icat ions.

There were two (2) alternatives to operatine this condition. Une was to shat down the plant, which would brce created additienal waste problers, and the other would have been to purp out the sump and overflow thi WST.

As neither of these two alternatives was acceptable, it was determined to accept the known high level in the Rh sump and to maintain discharges when spai e was available.

Should there be further questions, please contact us.

Very truly yours, FLORIDA POWER FORPORATIOS r

\ C Yt_. > . , 0 c + -

g

_g _

Nur I c.sr Pl. int % n.y'c r L

W. p. Stcwart M.in.lger. Nu lear t'perattons

.J L ! r .

852 085 i

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19207B509&oldid=2392731"