ML19341A646: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
{{#Wiki_filter:I i
{{#Wiki_filter:I i
i 1
i 1
    -      -
               -mem
               -mem
_ =          Portland General EectricCortpany
_ =          Portland General EectricCortpany Sac :,tm ke %sxm
              ,
Sac :,tm ke %sxm
                       .a.
                       .a.
January 21, 1981 Pebble Springs Nuclear Plant Dockets 50-514
January 21, 1981 Pebble Springs Nuclear Plant Dockets 50-514 50-515 Mr. Hugh L. Thompson, Acting Director Planning & Program Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
              .
50-515 Mr. Hugh L. Thompson, Acting Director Planning & Program Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555


==Dear Mr. Thompson:==
==Dear Mr. Thompson:==
Line 32: Line 27:
Please be advised that we are unable at this time to firmly identify any new applications and requests for review which we plan to submit to the NRC between now and December 31, 1983, that fall in the categories delineated in your letter of December 5, 1980. However, we are consider-ing pursuing a collateral siting effort in the State of Washington for our pending Pebble Springs Nuclear Pl. ant Construction Permit application which is based on an Oregon site. We will inform you if and when a decision is made in this regard.
Please be advised that we are unable at this time to firmly identify any new applications and requests for review which we plan to submit to the NRC between now and December 31, 1983, that fall in the categories delineated in your letter of December 5, 1980. However, we are consider-ing pursuing a collateral siting effort in the State of Washington for our pending Pebble Springs Nuclear Pl. ant Construction Permit application which is based on an Oregon site. We will inform you if and when a decision is made in this regard.
Our Pebble Springs Unit 1 and 2 Construction Permit application has been under NRC review since 1974. Beca:tse NRC review of Construction Permit applications has been in abeyance. since the TMI-2 accident, a realistic estimata of the construction completion date for these units is indeterminate at this point in time.
Our Pebble Springs Unit 1 and 2 Construction Permit application has been under NRC review since 1974. Beca:tse NRC review of Construction Permit applications has been in abeyance. since the TMI-2 accident, a realistic estimata of the construction completion date for these units is indeterminate at this point in time.
Sincerely,
Sincerely, Bart D. Withers Vice President                                        l Nuclear l
                                                              "
Bart D. Withers Vice President                                        l Nuclear l
1
1
(          c:    Mr. Lynn Frank, Director                                              O          9
(          c:    Mr. Lynn Frank, Director                                              O          9 State of Oregon                                                    4    *, W    b ,g Department of Energy                                                I    Ii ,    %
'
State of Oregon                                                    4    *, W    b ,g Department of Energy                                                I    Ii ,    %
                                                                                                $
1 44s
1 44s
                           ~
                           ~
                            --.
                                           ~ ,'' ;
                                           ~ ,'' ;
                                               ~
                                               ~
8101270 Q 6}}
8101270 Q 6}}

Latest revision as of 09:53, 31 January 2020

Advises That Util Is Unable to Firmly Identify New Applications & Requests for Review Planned by 831231,in Response to NRC 801205 Request.Consideration of Collateral Siting Effort W/States of Wa & or Is Under Review
ML19341A646
Person / Time
Site: 05000514, 05000515
Issue date: 01/21/1981
From: Withers B
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To: Thompson H
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8101270596
Download: ML19341A646 (1)


Text

I i

i 1

-mem

_ = Portland General EectricCortpany Sac :,tm ke %sxm

.a.

January 21, 1981 Pebble Springs Nuclear Plant Dockets 50-514 50-515 Mr. Hugh L. Thompson, Acting Director Planning & Program Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Mr. Thompson:

Please be advised that we are unable at this time to firmly identify any new applications and requests for review which we plan to submit to the NRC between now and December 31, 1983, that fall in the categories delineated in your letter of December 5, 1980. However, we are consider-ing pursuing a collateral siting effort in the State of Washington for our pending Pebble Springs Nuclear Pl. ant Construction Permit application which is based on an Oregon site. We will inform you if and when a decision is made in this regard.

Our Pebble Springs Unit 1 and 2 Construction Permit application has been under NRC review since 1974. Beca:tse NRC review of Construction Permit applications has been in abeyance. since the TMI-2 accident, a realistic estimata of the construction completion date for these units is indeterminate at this point in time.

Sincerely, Bart D. Withers Vice President l Nuclear l

1

( c: Mr. Lynn Frank, Director O 9 State of Oregon 4 *, W b ,g Department of Energy I Ii ,  %

1 44s

~

~ , ;

~

8101270 Q 6