ML19343A478: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 32: Line 32:
==Dear Mr. Keppler:==
==Dear Mr. Keppler:==


l                A final report of our analysis and evaluations of the potential misapplication problem on Rosemount pressure transmitters de-
l                A final report of our analysis and evaluations of the potential misapplication problem on Rosemount pressure transmitters de-scribed in the subject bulletin cannot be submitted to your office by the August 27, 1980 deadline specified. The extent and com-plexity of the required analysis necessitates that we request an extension of the reporting date.
                                                                                                          ,
scribed in the subject bulletin cannot be submitted to your office by the August 27, 1980 deadline specified. The extent and com-plexity of the required analysis necessitates that we request an extension of the reporting date.
The formal results of our review of the transmitter applications, and a complete description of all the required corrective action resulting therefrom, together with the schedule for accomplishing the corrective actions will be submitted by October 1,1980.
The formal results of our review of the transmitter applications, and a complete description of all the required corrective action resulting therefrom, together with the schedule for accomplishing the corrective actions will be submitted by October 1,1980.
Should you require additional information from Detroit Eaison in this matter, please advise us.
Should you require additional information from Detroit Eaison in this matter, please advise us.
Very truly yours, EH/JDR/1m                                        h (A, P t      '
Very truly yours, EH/JDR/1m                                        h (A, P t      '
yS cc: Director Division of Reactor Construction Inspection Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commimion Washington, D.C. 20555 Director Division of Operating Reac*ars Office of Nuclear Reactor Mcgulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Bruce Little, Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office 6450 North Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 SEP 021980
yS cc: Director Division of Reactor Construction Inspection Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commimion Washington, D.C. 20555 Director Division of Operating Reac*ars Office of Nuclear Reactor Mcgulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Bruce Little, Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office 6450 North Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 SEP 021980 8009180 O 2 9}}
          ,
8009180 O 2 9}}

Revision as of 07:53, 31 January 2020

Requests Extension Until 801001 to Respond to IE Bulletin 80-16 Re Potential Misapplication of Rosemount Pressure Transmitters.Required Analysis Complex & Extensive
ML19343A478
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/26/1980
From: Hines E
DETROIT EDISON CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
EF2-49-837, IEB-80-16, NUDOCS 8009180029
Download: ML19343A478 (1)


Text

. . - - . . . _ - . - , _ _ _ _

Edwird Hints '

i Asswer v<e Pres. cent CmffAssurance Detroi!

. ISOn =2000 Second Avenuew -=

August 26, 1980 Mr. James G. Keppler '

Regional Director i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

, Region III 799 Roosevelt Road l Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 1

Re ference
Enrico Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2 USNRC Licensing Docket: 50-341 j USNRC IE Bulletin 80-16 (6-27-80) i

Subject:

Detroit Edison Response to NRC IE Bulletin 80-16 I

Dear Mr. Keppler:

l A final report of our analysis and evaluations of the potential misapplication problem on Rosemount pressure transmitters de-scribed in the subject bulletin cannot be submitted to your office by the August 27, 1980 deadline specified. The extent and com-plexity of the required analysis necessitates that we request an extension of the reporting date.

The formal results of our review of the transmitter applications, and a complete description of all the required corrective action resulting therefrom, together with the schedule for accomplishing the corrective actions will be submitted by October 1,1980.

Should you require additional information from Detroit Eaison in this matter, please advise us.

Very truly yours, EH/JDR/1m h (A, P t '

yS cc: Director Division of Reactor Construction Inspection Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commimion Washington, D.C. 20555 Director Division of Operating Reac*ars Office of Nuclear Reactor Mcgulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Bruce Little, Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office 6450 North Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 SEP 021980 8009180 O 2 9