ML17223A636: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:AC(FLEA'l'Uu uL5i'KLUul'ION uM4OblhilMA'I'jOb!
{{#Wiki_filter:AC( FLEA'l'Uu uL5i'KLUul'ION uM4OblhilMA'I'jOb! SYSi'j 'M
SYSi'j'M~0 REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR: 9005110175 DOC.DATE: 90/05/08 NOTARIZED:
                        ~                                     0 REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
NO FACIL:50-335 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power&Light Co.50-389 St.Lu&e Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power&Light Co.AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SAGER,D.A.
ACCESSION NBR: 9005110175           DOC. DATE:   90/05/08   NOTARIZED: NO             DOCKET  Pr FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power               & Light   Co.       05000335 50-389 St. Lu&e Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power               & Light   Co.       05000389 AUTH. NAME           AUTHOR AFFILIATION SAGER,D.A.           Florida   Power & Light Co.
Florida Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)DOCKET Pr 05000335 05000389
RECIP.NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document           Control Desk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Responds to NRC Bulletin 88-010,"Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers." DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE21D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL 0 SIZE: TITLE: Bulletin Response 88-10-Nonconforming Molded C se Circus,t Brea ers.NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 LA NORRIS,J INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA NRR DOEA/GCB 11 NRR GUILLEN,J NRR/DET/EMEB9H3 NRR/DOEA/OGCB11 NRR/DST 8E2 NRR/POTAPOVS,U RES/DSIR/EIB EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD AEOD/DS P/TPAB NRR GILL,A.S.NRR STONE,J.C.
Responds     to NRC Bulletin         88-010, "Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers."
NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 NRR/DREP/PEPB9D RGN2 FILE NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL ,1 1'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.1 1 1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENIS:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE21D TITLE:  Bulletin    Response COPIES RECEIVED:LTR 88-10 ENCL Nonconforming Molded 0se SIZE:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEt CONTACT THE DOCUMENI'ONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISHUBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENIS YOU DON'T NEED)TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES.REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 21  
C   Circus,t   Brea ers.
NOTES:
RECIPIENT              COPIES              RECIPIENT         COPIES ID CODE/NAME           LTTR ENCL        ID  CODE/NAME      LTTR ENCL PD2-2 LA NORRIS,J 1
1 0
1 PD2-2 PD              ,1        1' INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA                     1     1     AEOD/DS P/TPAB                   1 NRR DOEA/GCB 11              1    1      NRR  GILL,A.S.         1      1 NRR GUILLEN,J                1    1      NRR  STONE,J.C.         1      1 NRR/DET/EMEB9H3              1    1      NRR/DOEA/OEAB11         1      1 NRR/DOEA/OGCB11              1    1      NRR/DREP/PEPB9D         1      1 NRR/DST 8E2                  1     1                               1       1 NRR/POTAPOVS,U              1     1                               1       1 RES/DSIR/EIB                1     1     RGN2    FILE            1     . 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR                          1     1     NRC PDR                  1       1 NSIC                        1     1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENIS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEt CONTACT THE DOCUMENI'ONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISHUBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENIS YOU DON'T NEED)
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES. REQUIRED: LTTR               22   ENCL   21


P.O..l4000,Juno Beech,iL 33408 0420@PL MAY, 0 8 1990, L-90-161 10 CFR 50.54(f)U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Gentlemen:
P.O.. l4000,Juno Beech,iL 33408 0420
Re: St.Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-335 and 50-389 NRC Bulletin No.88-10 Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers TAC Nos.71358 and 71359 NRC Bulletin No.88-10,"Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers", issued November 22, 1988, requested that licensees take actions to provide reasonable assurance that molded-case circuit breakers (CBs), including CBs used with motor controllers; purchased for use in safety-related applications without verifiable traceability to the CB manufacturers, perform their safety functions.
    @PL MAY, 0 8 1990, L-90-161 10 CFR     50.54(f)
By letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989, Florida Power&Light Company (FPL)submitted a partial, response to NRC Bulletin No.88-10.The purpose of this submittal is to provide FPL's response to the remaining requirements of the bulletin.This completes FPL's response to NRC Bulletin No.88-10.Should there be any questions about this information, contact us.I please Very truly yours, D.A.ger Vice r sident St.L ie Plant DAS/MS D/gp Attachment cc: Stewart D.Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant 5'005110175 5'00508 PDR ADOCK 05000335 O PDC an FPL Group company ATTACHMENT NRC BULLETIN No.88-10 Re ortin Re irement: 1.All holders of operating licenses are required to provide a written report by April 1, 1989, that: a~Confirms that only molded-case Circuit Breakers (CBs)that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested are being maintained as stored spares for future use in safety-related applications.
U. S.     Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:       Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.             20555 Gentlemen:
FPL Res onse Florida Power&Light Company (FPL)provided a response to Reporting Requirement 1.a.in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989'e ortin Re irement: 1.b.Summarizes the total number, manufacturer, model number, and to the extent possible the procurement chain of those CBs that could not be traced to the CBM in items 1 and 4 of the actions requested.
Re:     St. Lucie Units           1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 NRC Bulletin No. 88-10 Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers TAC Nos.       71358 and 71359 NRC     Bulletin No. 88-10, "Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers", issued November 22, 1988, requested that licensees take actions to provide reasonable assurance that molded-case circuit breakers           (CBs), including CBs used with motor controllers; purchased         for use in safety-related applications without verifiable traceability to the CB manufacturers, perform their safety functions.
By   letter         L-89-120 dated     April 3,   1989,   Florida       Power       &   Light Company (FPL) submitted a             partial, response to NRC Bulletin No. 88-
: 10. The purpose of this submittal is to provide FPL's response to the remaining requirements of the bulletin. This completes FPL's response         to   NRC Bulletin No. 88-10.
I Should       there be any questions           about   this information, please contact us.
Very     truly     yours, D. A.         ger Vice r sident St. L ie Plant DAS/MS D/gp Attachment cc:     Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region                         II,   USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant 5'005110175 5'00508 PDR     ADOCK 05000335 O                     PDC an FPL Group company
 
ATTACHMENT NRC BULLETIN No. 88-10 Re ortin Re irement:
: 1. All holders of operating licenses are required to provide a written report by April 1, 1989, that:
a ~     Confirms that only molded-case Circuit Breakers (CBs) that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested are being maintained as stored spares for future use in safety-related applications.
FPL Res onse Florida     Power   & Light Company   (FPL) provided a response to Reporting Requirement 1.a. in       letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989
          'e ortin     Re   irement:
1.b. Summarizes the total number, manufacturer, model number, and to the extent possible the procurement chain of those CBs that could not be traced to the CBM in items 1 and 4 of the actions requested.      For installed CBs, also identify each system in which they are/were installed.            Zf item 4 of the actions requested has not been completed by April 1, 1989, due to the schedule for tests in item 3 of the actions requested, this information should be updated within 30 days of the completion of item 4 to address those additional CBs that could not be traced to the CBM.
FPL Res onse Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) provided a response to item 1 of the actions requested in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989.        For FPL's response to item 4 of the actions requested, refer to Reporting Requirement 1.c. below.
Re ortin    Re  irement:
1.c. Confirms that items      1( 2g  3I 4g    5  6  and 7 of the actions requested      have. been  completed or    will  be implemented as requested.
 
Action  Re ested:  1.
All addresses  are requested to perform the following review by March >, 1989:
a ~  Identify all molded-case CBs purchased prior to August 1, 1988, that are being maintained as stored spares for safety-related (Class 1E) applications or commercial grade CBs that are being maintained as stored spares for future use in safety-related applications; this includes CBs purchased from a CBM or from any other source.      If the number of these stored spare CBs is less than 50 at a nuclear plant site, then randomly select CBs purchased between August 1, 1983 and August 1, 1988 that have been installed in safety-related applications as replacements or modifications to form a minimum sample of 50 CBs per nuclear plant site.
: b. Verify the traceability of these CBs.
c ~  Identify the number, manufacturer, model number, and to the extent possible the procurement chain for all those CBs identified in (la) that cannot be traced to the CBM.
For installed CBs, also identify each system in which they are/were installed.
For installed CBs, also identify each system in which they are/were installed.
Zf item 4 of the actions requested has not been completed by April 1, 1989, due to the schedule for tests in item 3 of the actions requested, this information should be updated within 30 days of the completion of item 4 to address those additional CBs that could not be traced to the CBM.FPL Res onse Florida Power&Light Company (FPL)provided a response to item 1 of the actions requested in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989.For FPL's response to item 4 of the actions requested, refer to Reporting Requirement 1.c.below.Re ortin Re irement: 1.c.Confirms that items 1(2g 3I 4g 5 6 and 7 of the actions requested have.been completed or will be implemented as requested.
FPL Res onse FPL provided a response to Actions Requested 1.a., 1.b.,   and 1.c. in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989.
Action Re ested: 1.All addresses are requested to perform the following review by March>, 1989: a~Identify all molded-case CBs purchased prior to August 1, 1988, that are being maintained as stored spares for safety-related (Class 1E)applications or commercial grade CBs that are being maintained as stored spares for future use in safety-related applications; this includes CBs purchased from a CBM or from any other source.If the number of these stored spare CBs is less than 50 at a nuclear plant site, then randomly select CBs purchased between August 1, 1983 and August 1, 1988 that have been installed in safety-related applications as replacements or modifications to form a minimum sample of 50 CBs per nuclear plant site.b.Verify the traceability of these CBs.c~Identify the number, manufacturer, model number, and to the extent possible the procurement chain for all those CBs identified in (la)that cannot be traced to the CBM.For installed CBs, also identify each system in which they are/were installed.
Action Re ested:   2.
FPL Res onse FPL provided a response to Actions Requested 1.a., 1.b., and 1.c.in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989.Action Re ested: 2.All holders of operating licenses who identify installed CBs per item 1 above or item 4 below that cannot be traced to a CBM are requested to prepare, within 30 days of the completion of each item, an analysis justifying continued operation until items 1 through 5 of the actions requested in this bulletin have been completed.
All holders of operating licenses   who identify installed CBs per item 1 above or item 4 below that cannot be traced to a CBM are requested to prepare, within 30 days of the completion of each item, an analysis justifying continued operation until items 1 through 5 of the actions requested in this bulletin have been completed.
FPL Res onse Following FPL's response to item 1 of the actions requested (see FPL letter L-89-120, dated April 3, 1989), an assessment of the acceptability for use of all installed safety related circuit breakers (CB)that were procured under the same purchase orders as the 22 nontraceable stored spare CBs was performed (
FPL Res onse Following FPL's response to item 1 of the actions requested (see FPL letter L-89-120, dated April 3, 1989), an assessment of the acceptability for use of all installed safety related circuit breakers (CB) that were procured under the same purchase orders as the 22 nontraceable stored spare CBs was performed (


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
NRC Bulletin No. 88-10 Supplement 1, Position 4). The results revealed one untraceable CB was installed in .the St. Lucie Unit 2 Qualified Safety Parameter Display System. This breaker has since been replaced with a traceable CB in accordance with. the criteria of item 7 of the
actions requested.          The    information concerning this nontraceable breaker, as requested in item 4.c. of the actions requested,    is provided in Attachment 1 (item 1).
items 3, 4 and 5 of the Additionally, see FPL's responses to information actions requested for the remaining                  requested in Action Requested 2.
Action Re    ested:  3.
All addressees    who identify 80 percent or more CBs traceable to the  CBM per  item 1 above are requested to test. the CBs that are not traceable to the CBM in accordance with the test program described in Attachment 1. Any installed CBs that fail any of these tests should be replaced with CBs that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested or CBs that pass all tests in accordance with the testing program described in Attachment 1.      If more than 10 percent of the CBs tested fail any of the tests described in Attachment 1, continue with item 4; otherwise, proceed to item 6 of the actions requested.
Holders of operating licenses are requested to complete this testing program before startup from the first refueling outage beginning after March 1, 1989.          Holders of construction permits are requested to complete this testing program before fuel load.
FPL Res onse FPL determined that twenty-two (22) out of one hundred and twenty-four (124) CBs were maintained as stored spares which could not be traced to the original CB manufacturers (see FPL letter L-89-120, dated April 3, 1989). Therefore, FPL had determined that 80 percent or more of the stored spare CBs were traceable to the CBM. In an NRC memorandum dated January 5, 1989 (Charles E. Rossi to Steven A. Varga and Gary M Holahan, "Interpretation/Clarification of Bulletin No. 88-10:    Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers" ), the NRC Staff agreed that testing of the nontraceable spares need not be performed provided the utility performs Bulletin No. 88-10 items 4 and 5 of the actions requested, regardless of the traceability results of item 1 of the bulletin. Following a review of the Bulletin No. 88-10 CB test program, FPL elected not to test the twenty-two nontraceable CBs, but instead elected to perform items 4 and 5 of the actions requested in accordance with the January 5, 1989, NRC memorandum.
Action  Re  ested:  4.
All addresses who identify less than 80 percent of the CBs traceable-+to the CBM per item 1 above or who identify a failure rate of more than 10 percent for the CBs tested per item  3  above are requested  to perform the following actions:
a~    Identify all molded-case CBs that have, been purchased between August 1, 1983 and August 1, 1988, and installed in safety-related applications as replacements or installed during modifications.
: b. Verify the traceability of these CBs.
c ~  Identify the number, manufacturer, model number, system in which they are/were installed, and to the extent possible, the procurement chain for all those CBs identified in (4a) that cannot be traced to the CBM.
FPL Res onse FPL identified all St. Lucie plant molded-case CBs purchased between August 1, 1983 and August 1, 1988 and installed in safety-related applications. Traceability to the original CB manufacturer has been determined for all but four (4) CBs.
Attachment 1 lists the information requested in item 4.c.
four installed (items 2-5 of Attachment 1) CBs which for'hose were not traced to the original CB manufacturer.
Action  Re  ested:  5.
All  addressees  who  identify installed  CBs  that cannot          be traced to the CBM per item 4 above are requested to replace these CBs with components that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested or to test them in accordance with the program described in Attachment 1; CBs that fail any of these tests should be replaced with CBs that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested or CBs that pass all tests in accordance with the test program described in Attachment 1.
Holders of operating licenses are requested to replace or to
~
test at least one-half, or all      if the total number is less than 75, of these installed CBs before startup from the first refueling outage beginning after March 1, 1989. The remaining CBs should be replaced or tested before startup from the second refueling outage beginning after March 1, 1989.
Holders of construction permits are requested to replace or to test these installed CBs before fuel load.


NRC Bulletin No.88-10 Supplement 1, Position 4).The results revealed one untraceable CB was installed in.the St.Lucie Unit 2 Qualified Safety Parameter Display System.This breaker has since been replaced with a traceable CB in accordance with.the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested.
FPL Res onse FPL has elected to replace those CBs listed in Attachment 1 with breakers that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested.             Three of the five breakers listed in Attachment 1 have already been replaced.                 The other two breakers are scheduled to be replaced as shown in Attachment 1 (Replacement Status) as required by Bulletin No. 88-10. For the breakers to be replaced, a justification for continued operation for each breaker has been developed in accordance with item 2 of the actions requested.
The information concerning this nontraceable breaker, as requested in item 4.c.of the actions requested, is provided in Attachment 1 (item 1).Additionally, see FPL's responses to items 3, 4 and 5 of the actions requested for the remaining information requested in Action Requested 2.Action Re ested: 3.All addressees who identify 80 percent or more CBs traceable to the CBM per item 1 above are requested to test.the CBs that are not traceable to the CBM in accordance with the test program described in Attachment 1.Any installed CBs that fail any of these tests should be replaced with CBs that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested or CBs that pass all tests in accordance with the testing program described in Attachment 1.If more than 10 percent of the CBs tested fail any of the tests described in Attachment 1, continue with item 4;otherwise, proceed to item 6 of the actions requested.
Action Re ested: 6.
Holders of operating licenses are requested to complete this testing program before startup from the first refueling outage beginning after March 1, 1989.Holders of construction permits are requested to complete this testing program before fuel load.FPL Res onse FPL determined that twenty-two (22)out of one hundred and twenty-four (124)CBs were maintained as stored spares which could not be traced to the original CB manufacturers (see FPL letter L-89-120, dated April 3, 1989).Therefore, FPL had determined that 80 percent or more of the stored spare CBs were traceable to the CBM.In an NRC memorandum dated January 5, 1989 (Charles E.Rossi to Steven A.Varga and Gary M Holahan,"Interpretation/Clarification of Bulletin No.88-10: Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers"), the NRC Staff agreed that testing of the nontraceable spares need not be performed provided the utility performs Bulletin No.88-10 items 4 and 5 of the actions requested, regardless of the traceability results of item 1 of the bulletin.Following a review of the Bulletin No.88-10 CB test program, FPL elected not to test the twenty-two nontraceable CBs, but instead elected to perform items 4 and 5 of the actions requested in accordance with the January 5, 1989, NRC memorandum.
Information generated while performing the actions requested in items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above should be documented and maintained for a period of 5 years after the completion of all requested   actions.'PL Res onse FPL provided           a response   to Action Requested   6. in letter L-89-120 dated             April 3,   1989.
Action Re ested: 4.All addresses who identify less than 80 percent of the CBs traceable-+to the CBM per item 1 above or who identify a failure rate of more than 10 percent for the CBs tested per item 3 above are requested to perform the following actions: a~Identify all molded-case CBs that have, been purchased between August 1, 1983 and August 1, 1988, and installed in safety-related applications as replacements or installed during modifications.
Action Re ested: 7 With the exception of actions taken in response to items 3 and 5 of the actions requested above, molded-case CBs installed in safety-related applications after August 1, 1988 should be:
b.Verify the traceability of these CBs.c~Identify the number, manufacturer, model number, system in which they are/were installed, and to the extent possible, the procurement chain for all those CBs identified in (4a)that cannot be traced to the CBM.FPL Res onse FPL identified all St.Lucie plant molded-case CBs purchased between August 1, 1983 and August 1, 1988 and installed in safety-related applications.
a ~   Manufactured by and procured from a               CBM under a 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, program; or
Traceability to the original CB manufacturer has been determined for all but four (4)CBs.Attachment 1 lists the information requested in item 4.c.for'hose four installed (items 2-5 of Attachment 1)CBs which were not traced to the original CB manufacturer.
: b. Procured             from   a CBM   or others with verifiable traceability to the               CBM, in compliance with applicable industry standards, and upgraded to safety-related by the licensee or others using an acceptable dedication program. The NRC encourages addresses to significantly upgrade their dedication programs through a joint industry effort to ensure their adequacy and consistency.
Action Re ested: 5.All addressees who identify installed CBs that cannot be traced to the CBM per item 4 above are requested to replace these CBs with components that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested or to test them in accordance with the program described in Attachment 1;CBs that fail any of these tests should be replaced with CBs that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested or CBs that pass all tests in accordance with the test program described in Attachment 1.Holders of operating licenses are requested to replace or to~test at least one-half, or all if the total number is less than 75, of these installed CBs before startup from the first refueling outage beginning after March 1, 1989.The remaining CBs should be replaced or tested before startup from the second refueling outage beginning after March 1, 1989.Holders of construction permits are requested to replace or to test these installed CBs before fuel load.
FPL Res onse FPL has elected to replace those CBs listed in Attachment 1 with breakers that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested.
Three of the five breakers listed in Attachment 1 have already been replaced.The other two breakers are scheduled to be replaced as shown in Attachment 1 (Replacement Status)as required by Bulletin No.88-10.For the breakers to be replaced, a justification for continued operation for each breaker has been developed in accordance with item 2 of the actions requested.
Action Re ested: 6.Information generated while performing the actions requested in items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above should be documented and maintained for a period of 5 years after the completion of all requested actions.'PL Res onse FPL provided a response to Action Requested 6.in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989.Action Re ested: 7 With the exception of actions taken in response to items 3 and 5 of the actions requested above, molded-case CBs installed in safety-related applications after August 1, 1988 should be: a~b.Manufactured by and procured from a CBM under a 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, program;or Procured from a CBM or others with verifiable traceability to the CBM, in compliance with applicable industry standards, and upgraded to safety-related by the licensee or others using an acceptable dedication program.The NRC encourages addresses to significantly upgrade their dedication programs through a joint industry effort to ensure their adequacy and consistency.
The NRC will monitor these industry initiatives and if they are not sufficient or not timely, or if problems with the dedication of commercial grade equipment for safety-related use continue, the NRC will take appropriate regulatory actions.
The NRC will monitor these industry initiatives and if they are not sufficient or not timely, or if problems with the dedication of commercial grade equipment for safety-related use continue, the NRC will take appropriate regulatory actions.
FPL Res onse Molded case CBs to be installed in safety-related applications are manufactured and procured from a CB manufacturer under a 10 CFR 50, Appendix B program.Additionally, statements have been added to procurement documents for all molded case CBs requiring that certification of traceability to the breaker manufacturer be provided with, the breakers.Re ortin Re irement: 2~All holders of operating licenses are required to submit a report that summarizes available results of tests conducted in accordance with items 3 and 5 of the actions requested within 30 days after startup from the first and second refueling obtages beginning after March 1, 1989.For CBs that pass these tests, the only information required is the number, manufacturer, model number and to the extent possible the procurement chain of CBs tested (summary report format is acceptable).
 
For CBs that fail these test(s)these reports should indicate the test(s)and the values of test parameter(s) at which the failure(s) occurred, as well as the corresponding manufacturer, model number, and to the extent possible, the procurement chain.FPL Res onse As stated in response to item 4 of the actions requested, FPL elected not to test the twenty-two nontraceable breakers, and instead elected to perform items 4 and 5 of actions requested.
FPL Res onse Molded case CBs to be installed in safety-related applications are manufactured and procured from   a CB manufacturer under a 10 CFR 50, Appendix B program. Additionally, statements have been added to procurement documents for all molded case CBs requiring that certification of traceability to the breaker manufacturer be provided with,the breakers.
Re ortin   Re irement:
2 ~   All holders of operating licenses     are required to submit a report that summarizes available results of tests conducted in accordance with items 3 and 5 of the actions requested within 30 days after startup from the first and second refueling obtages beginning after March 1, 1989. For CBs that pass these tests, the only information required is the number, manufacturer, model number and to the extent possible the procurement chain of CBs tested (summary report format is acceptable). For CBs that fail these test(s) these reports should indicate the test(s)         and the values     of test parameter(s) at which the failure(s) occurred, as well as the corresponding manufacturer, model number, and to the extent possible, the procurement chain.
FPL Res onse As stated in response to item 4 of the actions requested, FPL elected not to test the twenty-two nontraceable breakers, and instead elected to perform items 4 and 5 of actions requested.
Since FPL did not test, a report that summarizes the results of these test is not applicable.
Since FPL did not test, a report that summarizes the results of these test is not applicable.
PROCUREMENT 1)GE/Solidstate Unknown ATTACHMENT 1 MODEL PART THFK224150 UNIT SYSTEM REPLACEMENT STATUS Qualified Safety Replaced Parameter Display (9/25/89)System Inverter 2), West/CGD*Unknown FB3125L 1A Battery Charger Replaced (1/3/90)3)SQ.D./Whiting*
 
Unknown QOU120 Fuel Cask Crane Replaced (12/15/89) 4)GE/GESCO Unknown THED136070 Breaker Feeds Power Panel 220 from Motor Control Center 2A6 Scheduled Replacement (Fall 1990)5)West/L&D Unknown QC1030 Breaker for Limit Scheduled Switch to 2B DC Replacement Bus Tie Breaker (Fall 1990)Motor Operated*A final determination on the traceability of this breaker was not made since a traceable replacement breaker was available.
ATTACHMENT 1 PROCUREMENT                                             REPLACEMENT MODEL PART      UNIT        SYSTEM            STATUS
: 1)     GE/Solidstate   Unknown     THFK224150           Qualified Safety     Replaced Parameter Display     (9/25/89)
System Inverter
: 2)   , West/CGD*       Unknown     FB3125L               1A Battery           Replaced Charger               (1/3/90)
: 3)     SQ.D./Whiting*   Unknown     QOU120               Fuel Cask Crane       Replaced (12/15/89)
: 4)     GE/GESCO         Unknown     THED136070           Breaker Feeds       Scheduled Power Panel 220     Replacement from Motor           (Fall   1990)
Control Center 2A6
: 5)     West/L&D         Unknown     QC1030               Breaker for Limit Scheduled Switch to 2B DC     Replacement Bus Tie Breaker     (Fall 1990)
Motor Operated
*A final determination on the traceability of this breaker was not made since a traceable replacement breaker was available.
7}}
7}}

Latest revision as of 21:52, 29 October 2019

Forwards Final Response to NRC Bulletin 88-010, Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers. One Untraceable Circuit Breaker Installed in Unit 2 Qualified SPDS & Replaced W/Traceable Breaker
ML17223A636
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/08/1990
From: Sager D
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
IEB-88-010, IEB-88-10, L-90-161, TAC-71358, TAC-71359, NUDOCS 9005110175
Download: ML17223A636 (10)


Text

AC( FLEA'l'Uu uL5i'KLUul'ION uM4OblhilMA'I'jOb! SYSi'j 'M

~ 0 REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR: 9005110175 DOC. DATE: 90/05/08 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET Pr FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000335 50-389 St. Lu&e Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000389 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SAGER,D.A. Florida Power & Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to NRC Bulletin 88-010, "Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers."

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE21D TITLE: Bulletin Response COPIES RECEIVED:LTR 88-10 ENCL Nonconforming Molded 0se SIZE:

C Circus,t Brea ers.

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 LA NORRIS,J 1

1 0

1 PD2-2 PD ,1 1' INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DS P/TPAB 1 NRR DOEA/GCB 11 1 1 NRR GILL,A.S. 1 1 NRR GUILLEN,J 1 1 NRR STONE,J.C. 1 1 NRR/DET/EMEB9H3 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OGCB11 1 1 NRR/DREP/PEPB9D 1 1 NRR/DST 8E2 1 1 1 1 NRR/POTAPOVS,U 1 1 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGN2 FILE 1 . 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENIS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEt CONTACT THE DOCUMENI'ONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISHUBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENIS YOU DON'T NEED)

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES. REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 21

P.O.. l4000,Juno Beech,iL 33408 0420

@PL MAY, 0 8 1990, L-90-161 10 CFR 50.54(f)

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 NRC Bulletin No. 88-10 Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers TAC Nos. 71358 and 71359 NRC Bulletin No. 88-10, "Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers", issued November 22, 1988, requested that licensees take actions to provide reasonable assurance that molded-case circuit breakers (CBs), including CBs used with motor controllers; purchased for use in safety-related applications without verifiable traceability to the CB manufacturers, perform their safety functions.

By letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) submitted a partial, response to NRC Bulletin No. 88-

10. The purpose of this submittal is to provide FPL's response to the remaining requirements of the bulletin. This completes FPL's response to NRC Bulletin No. 88-10.

I Should there be any questions about this information, please contact us.

Very truly yours, D. A. ger Vice r sident St. L ie Plant DAS/MS D/gp Attachment cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant 5'005110175 5'00508 PDR ADOCK 05000335 O PDC an FPL Group company

ATTACHMENT NRC BULLETIN No. 88-10 Re ortin Re irement:

1. All holders of operating licenses are required to provide a written report by April 1, 1989, that:

a ~ Confirms that only molded-case Circuit Breakers (CBs) that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested are being maintained as stored spares for future use in safety-related applications.

FPL Res onse Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) provided a response to Reporting Requirement 1.a. in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989

'e ortin Re irement:

1.b. Summarizes the total number, manufacturer, model number, and to the extent possible the procurement chain of those CBs that could not be traced to the CBM in items 1 and 4 of the actions requested. For installed CBs, also identify each system in which they are/were installed. Zf item 4 of the actions requested has not been completed by April 1, 1989, due to the schedule for tests in item 3 of the actions requested, this information should be updated within 30 days of the completion of item 4 to address those additional CBs that could not be traced to the CBM.

FPL Res onse Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) provided a response to item 1 of the actions requested in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989. For FPL's response to item 4 of the actions requested, refer to Reporting Requirement 1.c. below.

Re ortin Re irement:

1.c. Confirms that items 1( 2g 3I 4g 5 6 and 7 of the actions requested have. been completed or will be implemented as requested.

Action Re ested: 1.

All addresses are requested to perform the following review by March >, 1989:

a ~ Identify all molded-case CBs purchased prior to August 1, 1988, that are being maintained as stored spares for safety-related (Class 1E) applications or commercial grade CBs that are being maintained as stored spares for future use in safety-related applications; this includes CBs purchased from a CBM or from any other source. If the number of these stored spare CBs is less than 50 at a nuclear plant site, then randomly select CBs purchased between August 1, 1983 and August 1, 1988 that have been installed in safety-related applications as replacements or modifications to form a minimum sample of 50 CBs per nuclear plant site.

b. Verify the traceability of these CBs.

c ~ Identify the number, manufacturer, model number, and to the extent possible the procurement chain for all those CBs identified in (la) that cannot be traced to the CBM.

For installed CBs, also identify each system in which they are/were installed.

FPL Res onse FPL provided a response to Actions Requested 1.a., 1.b., and 1.c. in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989.

Action Re ested: 2.

All holders of operating licenses who identify installed CBs per item 1 above or item 4 below that cannot be traced to a CBM are requested to prepare, within 30 days of the completion of each item, an analysis justifying continued operation until items 1 through 5 of the actions requested in this bulletin have been completed.

FPL Res onse Following FPL's response to item 1 of the actions requested (see FPL letter L-89-120, dated April 3, 1989), an assessment of the acceptability for use of all installed safety related circuit breakers (CB) that were procured under the same purchase orders as the 22 nontraceable stored spare CBs was performed (

Reference:

NRC Bulletin No. 88-10 Supplement 1, Position 4). The results revealed one untraceable CB was installed in .the St. Lucie Unit 2 Qualified Safety Parameter Display System. This breaker has since been replaced with a traceable CB in accordance with. the criteria of item 7 of the

actions requested. The information concerning this nontraceable breaker, as requested in item 4.c. of the actions requested, is provided in Attachment 1 (item 1).

items 3, 4 and 5 of the Additionally, see FPL's responses to information actions requested for the remaining requested in Action Requested 2.

Action Re ested: 3.

All addressees who identify 80 percent or more CBs traceable to the CBM per item 1 above are requested to test. the CBs that are not traceable to the CBM in accordance with the test program described in Attachment 1. Any installed CBs that fail any of these tests should be replaced with CBs that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested or CBs that pass all tests in accordance with the testing program described in Attachment 1. If more than 10 percent of the CBs tested fail any of the tests described in Attachment 1, continue with item 4; otherwise, proceed to item 6 of the actions requested.

Holders of operating licenses are requested to complete this testing program before startup from the first refueling outage beginning after March 1, 1989. Holders of construction permits are requested to complete this testing program before fuel load.

FPL Res onse FPL determined that twenty-two (22) out of one hundred and twenty-four (124) CBs were maintained as stored spares which could not be traced to the original CB manufacturers (see FPL letter L-89-120, dated April 3, 1989). Therefore, FPL had determined that 80 percent or more of the stored spare CBs were traceable to the CBM. In an NRC memorandum dated January 5, 1989 (Charles E. Rossi to Steven A. Varga and Gary M Holahan, "Interpretation/Clarification of Bulletin No. 88-10: Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers" ), the NRC Staff agreed that testing of the nontraceable spares need not be performed provided the utility performs Bulletin No. 88-10 items 4 and 5 of the actions requested, regardless of the traceability results of item 1 of the bulletin. Following a review of the Bulletin No. 88-10 CB test program, FPL elected not to test the twenty-two nontraceable CBs, but instead elected to perform items 4 and 5 of the actions requested in accordance with the January 5, 1989, NRC memorandum.

Action Re ested: 4.

All addresses who identify less than 80 percent of the CBs traceable-+to the CBM per item 1 above or who identify a failure rate of more than 10 percent for the CBs tested per item 3 above are requested to perform the following actions:

a~ Identify all molded-case CBs that have, been purchased between August 1, 1983 and August 1, 1988, and installed in safety-related applications as replacements or installed during modifications.

b. Verify the traceability of these CBs.

c ~ Identify the number, manufacturer, model number, system in which they are/were installed, and to the extent possible, the procurement chain for all those CBs identified in (4a) that cannot be traced to the CBM.

FPL Res onse FPL identified all St. Lucie plant molded-case CBs purchased between August 1, 1983 and August 1, 1988 and installed in safety-related applications. Traceability to the original CB manufacturer has been determined for all but four (4) CBs.

Attachment 1 lists the information requested in item 4.c.

four installed (items 2-5 of Attachment 1) CBs which for'hose were not traced to the original CB manufacturer.

Action Re ested: 5.

All addressees who identify installed CBs that cannot be traced to the CBM per item 4 above are requested to replace these CBs with components that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested or to test them in accordance with the program described in Attachment 1; CBs that fail any of these tests should be replaced with CBs that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested or CBs that pass all tests in accordance with the test program described in Attachment 1.

Holders of operating licenses are requested to replace or to

~

test at least one-half, or all if the total number is less than 75, of these installed CBs before startup from the first refueling outage beginning after March 1, 1989. The remaining CBs should be replaced or tested before startup from the second refueling outage beginning after March 1, 1989.

Holders of construction permits are requested to replace or to test these installed CBs before fuel load.

FPL Res onse FPL has elected to replace those CBs listed in Attachment 1 with breakers that meet the criteria of item 7 of the actions requested. Three of the five breakers listed in Attachment 1 have already been replaced. The other two breakers are scheduled to be replaced as shown in Attachment 1 (Replacement Status) as required by Bulletin No. 88-10. For the breakers to be replaced, a justification for continued operation for each breaker has been developed in accordance with item 2 of the actions requested.

Action Re ested: 6.

Information generated while performing the actions requested in items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above should be documented and maintained for a period of 5 years after the completion of all requested actions.'PL Res onse FPL provided a response to Action Requested 6. in letter L-89-120 dated April 3, 1989.

Action Re ested: 7 With the exception of actions taken in response to items 3 and 5 of the actions requested above, molded-case CBs installed in safety-related applications after August 1, 1988 should be:

a ~ Manufactured by and procured from a CBM under a 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, program; or

b. Procured from a CBM or others with verifiable traceability to the CBM, in compliance with applicable industry standards, and upgraded to safety-related by the licensee or others using an acceptable dedication program. The NRC encourages addresses to significantly upgrade their dedication programs through a joint industry effort to ensure their adequacy and consistency.

The NRC will monitor these industry initiatives and if they are not sufficient or not timely, or if problems with the dedication of commercial grade equipment for safety-related use continue, the NRC will take appropriate regulatory actions.

FPL Res onse Molded case CBs to be installed in safety-related applications are manufactured and procured from a CB manufacturer under a 10 CFR 50, Appendix B program. Additionally, statements have been added to procurement documents for all molded case CBs requiring that certification of traceability to the breaker manufacturer be provided with,the breakers.

Re ortin Re irement:

2 ~ All holders of operating licenses are required to submit a report that summarizes available results of tests conducted in accordance with items 3 and 5 of the actions requested within 30 days after startup from the first and second refueling obtages beginning after March 1, 1989. For CBs that pass these tests, the only information required is the number, manufacturer, model number and to the extent possible the procurement chain of CBs tested (summary report format is acceptable). For CBs that fail these test(s) these reports should indicate the test(s) and the values of test parameter(s) at which the failure(s) occurred, as well as the corresponding manufacturer, model number, and to the extent possible, the procurement chain.

FPL Res onse As stated in response to item 4 of the actions requested, FPL elected not to test the twenty-two nontraceable breakers, and instead elected to perform items 4 and 5 of actions requested.

Since FPL did not test, a report that summarizes the results of these test is not applicable.

ATTACHMENT 1 PROCUREMENT REPLACEMENT MODEL PART UNIT SYSTEM STATUS

1) GE/Solidstate Unknown THFK224150 Qualified Safety Replaced Parameter Display (9/25/89)

System Inverter

2) , West/CGD* Unknown FB3125L 1A Battery Replaced Charger (1/3/90)
3) SQ.D./Whiting* Unknown QOU120 Fuel Cask Crane Replaced (12/15/89)
4) GE/GESCO Unknown THED136070 Breaker Feeds Scheduled Power Panel 220 Replacement from Motor (Fall 1990)

Control Center 2A6

5) West/L&D Unknown QC1030 Breaker for Limit Scheduled Switch to 2B DC Replacement Bus Tie Breaker (Fall 1990)

Motor Operated

  • A final determination on the traceability of this breaker was not made since a traceable replacement breaker was available.

7