ML13121A187

Request for Additional Information, Overall Integrated Plan in Response to 3/12/2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)

ML13121A187
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	06/07/2013
From:	Lyon C F Plant Licensing Branch IV
To:	Heflin A C Union Electric Co
Lyon C F
References
EA-12-051, TAC MF0773
Download: ML13121A187 (12)

Text

UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555..0001 June 7, 2013 Mr. Adam C. Heflin Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Union Electric Company P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251 SUB..CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 -REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RE: OVERALL INTEGRATED PLAN IN RESPONSE TO ORDER EA-12-051, "RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION" (TAC NO. MF0773)

Dear Mr. Heflin:

By letter dated February 28, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 130630581), Union Electric Company (dba Ameren Missouri, the licensee) submitted an Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) in response to the March 12, 2012, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, Commission)

Order modifying licenses with to requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool (SFP) Instrumentation (Order Number for Callaway Plant, Unit 1. The NRC staff endorsed Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) "Industry Guidance for Compliance with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Order EA-12-051, To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable SFP Revision 1, dated August 2012, with exceptions as documented in Interim Staff (ISG) 2012-03, "Compliance with Order EA-12-051, Reliable SFP Instrumentation," Revision dated August The NRC staff has determined that the additional information, as requested in the enclosure, is needed to complete its review. Please provide a response to the questions within 30 days of the date of this letter. If any part of this information is not available within 30 days of this request, please provide the date that this information will be provided.

A. Heflin -2 If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at 301-415-2296 or via e-mail at Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Carl F. Lyon, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OVERALL INTEGRATED PLAN IN RESPONSE TO ORDER EA-12-051, "RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION" UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-483 Introduction By letter dated February 28,2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 130630581), Union Electric Company (dba Ameren Missouri, the licensee) submitted an Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) in response to the March 12, 2012, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, Commission)

Order modifying licenses with regard to requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool (SFP) Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051; ADAMS Accession No. ML 12054A679) for Callaway Plant, Unit 1. The NRC staff endorsed Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-02, "Industry Guidance for Compliance with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Order EA-12-051, To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable SFP Instrumentation," Revision 1, dated August 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 12240A307), with exceptions as documented in Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) 2012-03, "Compliance with Order EA-12-051, Reliable SFP Instrumentation," Revision 0, dated August 29,2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 12221A339).

The NRC staff has reviewed the February 28, 2013, response by the licensee and determined that the following request for additional information (RAI) is needed to complete its technical review. If any part of this information is not available within the 30-day response period for this RAI, please provide the date this information will be submitted. Levels of Required Monitoring RAI-1 The OIP states, in part, that Level adequate to support operation of the normal fuel pool cooling system -Indicated level on either the primary or backup instrument channel of 24 feet 10.75 inches above the top of the fuel storage racks plus the accuracy of the SFP level instrument channel, which is to be determined.

This aligns with the normal SFP level as shown in Callaway Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Figure 1.2-21 (Reference

5) and provides adequate margin to maintain fuel pool cooling pump suction. Level adequate to provide substantial radiation shielding for a person standing on the spent fuel pool operating deck -Indicated level on either Enclosure

-2 the primary or backup instrument channel of greater than 10 feet (+/-1 foot) above the top of the fuel storage racks based on Reference 2 and Reference

3. This monitoring level ensures there is an adequate water level to provide substantial radiation shielding for a person standing on the spent fuel pool operating deck. Level where fuel remains covered -Indicated level on either the primary or backup instrument channel of greater than 1 foot above the top of the fuel storage racks plus the accuracy of the SFP level instrument channel. which is to be determined.

This monitoring level assures that there is adequate water level above the stored fuel seated in the rack. Please describe how the elevations within the SFP identified by the licensee as Level 1. Level 2, and Level 3 comply with Order EA-12-051 and NEI12-02.

Please provide the following: The specific functional reasons for identification of the elevations within the SFP as Levels 1, 2 and 3. For Level 1, please specify how the identified location represents the HIGHER of the two points described in the NEI 12-02 guidance for this level. A clearly labeled sketch depicting the elevation view of the proposed typical mounting arrangement for the portions of instrument channel consisting of permanent measurement channel equipment (e.g .. fixed level probes and/or stilling wells. and mounting brackets).

Please indicate on this sketch the data values representing Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3, as well as the top of the fuel. The sketch should indicate the portion of the level sensor measurement range that is sensitive to measurement of the fuel pool level. with respect to the Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 data points. Instrumentation Design Features Instruments RAI-2 The OIP states. in part. that There are also two mounted panels, providing sensor and display interfaces and wireless transmission and reception capabilities.

Please provide a plant-specific evaluation of the proposed wireless technology that will be used in the primary and backup measurement systems to address the criteria summarized in Section 3.1 of NEI 12-02.

-3.2 Arrangement RAI-3 The OIP states, in part, that The primary and backup instrument sensing components will be separated consistent with the guidelines of Reference 2 and Reference

3. Design of the mounting bracket will allow the fuel handling machine to pass over it without interference.

Please provide a clearly labeled sketch or marked-up plant drawing of the plan view of the spent fuel pool area, depicting the spent fuel pool inside dimensions, the planned locations/

placement of the primary and back-up spent fuel pool level sensor, and the proposed routing of the cables that will extend from the sensors toward the location of the read-out/display device. Also, please confirm that the proposed area(s) will be accessible when the SFP area is not accessible.

3.3 Mounting

RAI-4 The OIP states, in part, that The mounting of both the primary and backup system will be installed to maintain its integrity during and following a design basis seismic event. All locations will be reviewed for two-over-one seismic interference.

Please provide the following:

a) The design criteria that will be used to estimate the total loading on the mounting device(s), including static weight and dynamic loads. Please describe the methodology that will be used to estimate the total loading, inclusive of design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces. b} A description of the manner in which the level sensor (and stilling well, if appropriate) will be attached to the refueling floor and/or other support structures for each planned point of attachment of the probe assembly.

Indicate in a schematic the portions of the level sensor that will serve as points of attachment for mechanical/mounting or electrical connections.

c} A description of the manner by which the mechanical connections will attach the level instrument to permanent spent fuel pool structures so as to support the level sensor assembly.

3.4 Qualification

RAI-5 The OIP states. in part. that Reliability of both instrument channels will be demonstrated via an appropriate combination of design. analyses.

operating experience, and/or testing of channel components for the following sets of parameters: conditions in the area of instrument channel component used for all instrument components, effects of shock and vibration on instrument channel components used during and following any applicable event for installed components, and seismic effects on instrument channel components used during and following a potential seismic event for only installed components.

Please provide the following: A description of the specific method or combination of methods you intend to apply to demonstrate the reliability of the permanently installed equipment under beyond-design-basis ambient temperature, humidity, shock, vibration, and radiation conditions. A description of the testing and/or analyses that will be conducted to provide assurance that the equipment will perform reliably under the worst-case credible design basis loading at the location where the equipment will be mounted. Include a discussion of this seismic reliability demonstration as it applies to a) the level sensor mounted in the spent fuel pool area. and b) any control boxes, electronics, or read-out and re-transmitting devices that will be employed to convey the level information from the level sensor to the plant operators or emergency responders.

RAI-6 The OIP states, in part, that Demonstration of seismic adequacy will be achieved using one or more of the following methods: demonstration of seismic motion consistent with that of existing design basis loads at the installed location; substantial history of operational reliability in environments with significant vibration, such as for portable hand-held devices or transportation

-5 applications.

Such a vibration design envelope shall be inclusive of the effects of seismic motion imparted to the components proposed at the location of the proposed installation; adequacy of seismic design and installation is demonstrated based on the guidance in Sections 7,8,9, and 10 of IEEE [Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers]

Standard 344-2004, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Qualification of Class 1 E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations," (Reference

7) or a substantially similar industrial standard; demonstration that proposed devices are substantially similar in design to models that have been previously tested for seismic effects in excess of the plant design basis at the location where the instrument is to be installed (g-Ievels and frequency ranges); or seismic qualification using seismic motion consistent with that of existing design basis loading at the installation location.

Please provide a description of the specific method or combination of methods that will be used to confirm the reliability of the permanently installed equipment during and following seismic conditions to maintain its required accuracy. Independence RAI-7 The OIP states, in part, that The backup instrument system will be redundant to and independent of the primary instrument system. Independence of the two systems includes:

location, mounting, power sources, power and signal wiring, and indications, to prevent any failure of one system from affecting the other system. Please provide the following: A description of how the two channels of the proposed level measurement system meet this requirement so that the potential for a common cause event to adversely affect both channels is precluded. Further information on how each level measurement system, consisting of level sensor electronics, cabling, and readout devices will be designed and installed to address independence through the application and selection of independent power sources, the use of physical and spatial separation, independence of signals sent to the location(s) of the readout devices. and the independence of the displays.

-Power Supplies RAI-8 The OIP states, in part, that An ac source will be selected for each system's 24-Vdc [Volts dc] UPS [Uninterruptible Power Supply], with power cables routed separately through existing or new tray I conduit and penetrations.

Both channels will be powered by independent batteries following a loss-of-ac power. The minimum battery life will be 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> battery life is a sufficient amount of time for an alternate source of power to be provided by the plant-specific procedures to address Reference

6. Each channel will include an externally accessible bulkhead connector and transfer switch for connection of an alternate power source. If the level measurement channels are to be powered through a battery system (either directly or through an Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS), please provide the design criteria that will be applied to size the battery in a manner that ensures, with margin, that the channel will be available to run reliably and continuously following the onset of the beyond-design-basis event for the minimum duration needed, consistent with the plant FLEX Program plans. Accuracy RAI-9 The OIP states, in part, that Instrument channels will be designed such that they will maintain their specified accuracy without recalibration following a power interruption or change in power source. The accuracy will be within the resolution requirements of Reference 2, Figure 1. The instrument accuracy will be sufficient to allow personnel using plant procedures to determine when the water level reaches levels 1, 2, and 3 without conflicting or ambiguous indication.

Please provide the following: An estimate of the expected instrument channel accuracy performance (e.g., in percentage of span) under both i) normal spent fuel pool level conditions (approximately Level 1 or higher) and ii) at the beyond-design-basis conditions (Le., radiation, temperature, humidity, and post-seismic and post-shock conditions) that would be present if the SFP level were at the Level 2 and Level 3 datum points.

-7 A description of the methodology that will be used for determining the maximum allowed deviation from the instrument channel design accuracy that will be employed under normal operating conditions as an acceptance criterion for a calibration procedure to flag to operators and to technicians that the channel requires adjustment to within the normal condition design accuracy. Testing RAI-10 OIP states, in part, that Instrument channel design will provide for routine testing and consistent with Reference 2 and Reference Please provide the following: A description of the capability and provisions the proposed level sensing equipment will have to enable periodic testing and calibration, including how this capability enables the equipment to be tested in-situ. A description of how such testing and calibration will enable the conduct of regular channel checks of each independent channel against the other, and against any other permanently-installed spent fuel pool level instrumentation. A description of how functional checks will be performed, and the frequency at which they will be conducted.

Describe how calibration tests will be performed, and the frequency at which they will be conducted.

Provide a discussion as to how these surveillances will be incorporated into the plant surveillance program. A description of what preventative maintenance tasks are required to be performed during normal operation, and the planned maximum surveillance interval that is necessary to ensure that the channels are fully conditioned to accurately and reliably perform their functions when needed. Display The OIP states, in part, that The primary system indicator will be located in the vicinity of the control room. The backup system indicator will be located in an accessible location.

The locations will allow for reading of the indicators following an event. The display will provide continuous indication of the SFP water level and will be consistent with the guidelines of Reference 2 and Reference

3.

-8 Please provide the following: The specific location for the primary and backup instrument channel display. If the primary or backup display location is other than the main control room, then provide justification for prompt accessibility to displays including primary and alternate route evaluation, habitability at display location(s), continual resource availability for personnel responsible to promptly read displays, and provisions for communications with decision makers for the various SFP drain down scenarios and external events. The reasons justifying why the locations selected enable the information from these instruments to be considered "promptly accessible" to various drain-down scenarios and external events. Program Features 4.1 Procedures RAI-12 The DIP states, in part, that Procedures will be developed using guidelines and vendor instructions to address the maintenance, operation, and abnormal response issues associated with the new SFP instrumentation.

Please provide a description of the standards, guidelines and/or criteria will be utilized to develop procedures for inspection, maintenance, repair, operation, abnormal response and administrative controls associated with the SFP level instrumentation, as well as storage and installation of portable instruments.

4.2 Testing

and Calibration RAI-13 The DIP states, in part, that Processes will be established and maintained for scheduling and implementing necessary testing and calibration of the primary and backup spent fuel pool level instrument channels to maintain the instrument channels at the design accuracy.

Testing and calibration of the instrumentation will be consistent with vendor recommendations and any other documented basis.

-9 Please provide the following: Further information describing the maintenance and testing program the licensee will establish and implement to ensure that regular testing and calibration is performed and verified by inspection and audit to demonstrate conformance with design and system readiness requirements.

Include a description of your plans for ensuring that necessary channel checks, functional tests, periodic calibration, and maintenance will be conducted for the level measurement system and its supporting equipment. A description of how the guidance in NEI 12-02 Section 4.3 regarding compensatory actions for one or both non-functioning channels will be addressed. A description of what compensatory actions are planned in the event that one of the instrument channels cannot be restored to functional status within 90 days.

A. Heflin -2 If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at 301-415-2296 or via mail at Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov.

Docket No. 50-483

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC LPLIV Reading RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNroDelce Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl4 Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource RidsNrrPMCallaway Resource RidsRgn4MailCenter Resource CRoque-Cruz, NRR/DSS/SBPB MConcepcion, NRO/DE/ICE2 ADAMS Accession No.: ML 13121A187 Sincerely, IRA! Carl F. Lyon, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

• memo dated NRR/DORULPL4/PM NRR/DORULPL4/LA NRR/DS RR/DORULPL4/BC FLyon JBurkhardt GCasto' 06/07/13 5/3/13 4/26/13 M OFFICIAL RECORD COpy