NL-12-167, Indian Point, Unit 2, Enclosure to NL-12-167 Seismic Walkdown Report - Cover Through Page C-288 of 434

Indian Point, Unit 2, Enclosure to NL-12-167 Seismic Walkdown Report - Cover Through Page C-288 of 434

ML12346A342
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	11/20/2012
From:	Huebsch P Enercon Services
To:	Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-167 IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0
Download: ML12346A342 (367)

Text

ENCLOSURE TO NL-12-167 INDIAN POINT UNIT NO. 2 SEISMIC WALKDOWN REPORT ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev 0 Page 1 of 34==Enterfg ENTERGY NUCLEAR Engineering Report Cover Sheet Engineering Report Title: Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Engineering Report Type: New 0 Revision 03 Cancelled 13 Superseded Superseded by: Applicable Site(s)Ei IPI 0 ANOI F]EC No. 40676 OP2 AN02 1 IP3 0 ECH El JAF El GGNS El PNPS nl RBS El VY 1l WF3 El wpo LI PLP El Report Origin: Quality-Related:

F1 Entergy 0 Vendor Vendor Document No.: N/A E3 Yes 0 No-el=..Prepared by: Date: 11/20/2012 Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Approved by: Approved by: Paul Huebsch (ENERCON)Thomas Panayotidi (Peer Review Team Leader)J1ON M alggie Farah (E C N)Ri Drake (E GY)Thomas McCa Design Manager) (ENTERGY)Date: 11/20/2012 Date: 11/20/2012 Date: [ 2.-Date:i 2i Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 34 Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Reportfor Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE

.........................................................

3 2.0 SEISMIC LICENSING BASIS

SUMMARY

..............................................

4 2.1 SAFE SHUTDOW N EARTHQUAKE (SSE) ....................................................................................

4 2.2 DESIGN CODES, STANDARDS AND METHODS .........................................................................

4 3.0 SEISMIC WALKDOWN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH ...............................................

7 4.0 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

....................................................

8 4.1 EQUIPMENT SELECTION PERSONNEL

............................................

11 4.2 SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEERS

...............................................

11 4.3 LICENSING BASIS REVIEWERS

..................................................

11 4.4 IPEEE REVIEWERS

...........................................................

11 5.0 IPEEE VULNERA BILITIES REPO RTING .........................................................................................

14 6.0 SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LIST DEVELOPMENT

...........................................................

15 6.1 SAMPLE OF REQUIRED ITEMS FOR THE FIVE SAFETY FUNCTIONS

....................................

15 6.2 S P E N T F U E L P O O L IT E M S .............................................................................................................

17 6.3 DEFERRED INACCESSIBLE ITEMS on SW EL ...........................................................................

19 7.0 SEISMIC W ALKDOW NS AND AREA W ALK-BYS ...........................................................................

22 7.1 S E IS M IC W A LK D O W N S ..................................................................................................................

22 7 .2 A R E A W A L K -B Y S ............................................................................................................................

24 8.0 LIC ENSING BASIS EVA LUATIO NS ................................................................................................

25 8.1 C O N D IT IO N ID E N T IF IC A T IO N ........................................................................................................

25 8.2 C O N D IT IO N R E S O LU T IO N .............................................................................................................

25 8.3 LIC ENSING BASIS EVA LUATIO NS ..............................................................................................

26 8.4 CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM ENTRIES ........................................

26 8 .5 P LA N T C H A N G E S ...........................................................................................................................

2 7 9 .0 P E E R R E V IE W ...................................................................................................................................

2 8 9.1 P E E R R E V IEW P R O C E S S ..............................................................................................................

28 9.2 PEER REVIEW OF SEISMIC WALKDOWNS AND WALK-BYS .....................................................

28 10.0 R E F E R E N C E S ..........................................................

3.........

.............................................

..........

33 A T T A C H M E N T S .........................................................................................................................................

3 4 ATTACHMENT A -IPEEE VULNERABILITIES TABLE ............................................................................

34 ATTACHMENT B -SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LISTS ...........................................................

34 ATTACHMENT C -SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCs) .........................................................

34 ATTACHMENT D -AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs) .................................................................

34 ATTACHMENT E -POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS

.................................................

34 ATTACHMENT F -LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS ..............................................................

34 ATTACHMENT G -PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL ...............................................................

34 ATTACHMENT H -REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESOLUTIONS FORM ....................................................

34 ATTACHMENT I -SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES

...................................

34 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 3 of 34 1.0SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE The Great Tohoku Earthquake of March 11, 2011 and the resulting tsunami caused an accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan. In response to this accident, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) established the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF). The NTTF was tasked with conducting a systematic and methodical review of NRC processes and regulations and determining if the agency should make additional improvements to its regulatory system. On March 12, 2012 the NRC issued a 10CFR50.54(f)

Letter [Ref. 1] requesting information from all licensees to support the NRC staff's evaluation of several of the NTTF recommendations.

To support NTTF Recommendation 2.3, Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f) Letter requested that all licensees perform seismic walkdown inspections of the plant to gather and report information related to degraded, non-conforming, or unanalyzed conditions with respect to its current seismic licensing basis.The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), with support and direction from the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), published industry guidance for conducting and documenting the seismic walkdowns which represented the results of extensive interaction between NRC, NEI, and other stakeholders.

This industry guidance document, EPRI Report 1025286 [Ref. 2], hereafter referred to as "the Guidance," was formally endorsed by the NRC on May 31, 2012.Entergy Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 has committed to using this NRC-endorsed guidance as the basis for conducting and documenting seismic walkdowns for resolution of NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. To this end, Entergy has prepared Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walk-down Procedure EN-DC-168 to govern the performance of the seismic walkdowns and preparation of the seismic report.The objective of this report is to document the results of the seismic walkdown effort undertaken for resolution of NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic in accordance with the Guidance and under the guidance of Entergy procedure EN-DC-168, and provide the information necessary for responding to Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f) Letter.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 4 of 34 2.OSEISMIC LICENSING BASIS

SUMMARY

Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 is a pressurized water reactor (PWR) located in Buchanan, New York. The Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) was originally designed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation.

The Indian Point Energy Center consists of two similar units, Units 2 and 3, and Unit 1 which is decommissioned.

Unit 2 began commercial operation in September of 1973, and is currently rated at 1078 MW electric output from the turbine-generator

[Ref. 3]. This section summarizes the seismic licensing basis of structures, systems and components (SSCs) at Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 which bound the context of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program.2.1 SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE (SSE)The safe shutdown earthquake for the Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 site conforms to the average of response spectra developed by Housner and is anchored at 0.15g peak horizontal ground acceleration and 0. 1Og peak vertical ground acceleration

[Ref. 3].2.2 DESIGN CODES, STANDARDS AND METHODS Seismic Class I is defined as those structures and components including instruments and controls whose failure might cause or increase the severity of a loss-of-coolant accident or result in an uncontrolled release of radioactivity causing more than 10 rem to the thyroid or 10 rem whole body to the average adult beyond the nearest site boundary.

Also included are those structures and components vital to safe shutdown and isolation of the reactor.The criteria for functional adequacy of structures, equipment, piping, instrumentation, and controls follow: No loss of function implies that rotating equipment will not freeze, pressure vessels will not rupture, supports will not collapse under the load, systems required to be leak-tight will remain leak-tight, and components required to respond actively (such as valves and relays)will respond actively.

The criteria for functional adequacy of the structures state that stresses will not exceed yield when subjected to 0.15g horizontal ground acceleration.

The manner in which these criteria have been met is by limiting stresses in seismic Class I structures to meet the above criteria.

For all seismic Class I piping and their supports, the criteria for functional adequacy and the manner in which the criteria are met are the following:

with a ground acceleration of 0.15g horizontal, the spectral acceleration corresponding to the maximum point on the 0.5-percent critical damping response curve was used to calculate an equivalent static force imparted to the pipe at its support points. This resulted in a seismic design load approximately equal to 0.6W horizontally and 0.4W vertically taken simultaneously where W is the weight of the pipe including static forces. The sum of the resulting additional stress plus the normal stresses was limited to 1.2 times the B31.1 code Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 34 allowable.

The stresses in the pipe supports and hangers were likewise limited to 1.2 times the B31.1 code allowable.

Since all the buildings containing seismic Class I piping are essentially rigid structures, no amplification is expected.For seismic Class I equipment and tanks the same method was used to arrive at an equivalent static force. In each case, the total of seismic and normal stresses was limited to the applicable code allowable.

The refueling water storage tank and condensate storage tank were designed in accordance with the stress limitations of American Water Works Association Standard D100. All components of the reactor coolant system and associated systems are designed to the standards of the applicable ASME code or USAS code. The loading combinations, which are employed in the design of seismic Class I components of these systems, i.e., vessels, piping, supports, vessel internals and other applicable components, are given in FSAR Table 1.11-2 of the UFSAR. Table 1.11-2 also indicates the stress limits, which are used in the design of the listed equipment for the various loading combinations.

The original design criteria given above and in Table 1.11-2 have been modified in certain instances in accordance with NRC guidance given in FSAR References 3 and 4. Generic Letter 87-11 allows for the elimination of pipe whip restraints and jet impingement shields, which were installed to mitigate the effects of arbitrary intermediate pipe ruptures, provided certain criteria are met.These design criteria have also been modified in certain instances by the application of "leak before break" technology.

To be able to perform their function, i.e., allow core shutdown and cooling the reactor vessel internals must satisfy deformation limits, which are more restrictive than the stress limits The design of seismic Class I structures and components utilizes the "response spectrum" approach in the analysis of the dynamic loads imparted by the earthquake.

The analysis is based upon the response spectra shown on Figures 1.11-1 and 1.11-2 of the UFSAR. The following method of analysis is applied to seismic Class I structures and components including instrumentation:

The natural period of vibration of the structure or component is determined.

The response acceleration of the component to the seismic motion is taken from the response spectrum curve at the appropriate period.Stresses and deflections resulting from the combined influence of normal loads and the seismic load due to the Design Earthquake (0.05g acting in the vertical and 0.10g acting in the horizontal planes simultaneously) are calculated and checked against the limits imposed by the design standard.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 6 of 34 Stresses and deflections resulting from the combined influence of normal loads and the seismic loads due to the maximum potential earthquake (0.10g acting in the vertical and 0.15g acting in the horizontal planes simultaneously) are calculated and checked to verify that deflections do not cause loss of function and that stresses do not produce rupture.Where the vibrator system is of a highly complex geometric shape, such as piping systems, the maximum response from the response curve with the appropriate damping factor is selected.

By using this conservative value and demonstrating that the stresses are satisfactory, it becomes unnecessary to perform any further analysis to determine the natural periods of the system.

Engineering Report No. iP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 7 of 34 3.0SEISMIC WALKDOWN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH Entergy Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 has committed to conduct and document seismic walkdowns for resolution of NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic in accordance with the EPRI Seismic Walkdown Guidance [Ref. 2]. The approach provided in the Guidance for addressing the actions and information requested in Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f) Letter includes the following activities, the results of which are presented in the sections shown in parenthesis: " Assignment of appropriately qualified personnel (Section 4.0)* Reporting of actions taken to reduce or eliminate the seismic vulnerabilities identified by the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) program (Section 5.0)" Selection of structures, systems and components (SSCs) to be evaluated (Section 6.0)* Performance of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys (Section 7.0)" Evaluation and treatment of potentially adverse seismic conditions with respect to the seismic licensing basis of the plant (Section 8.0)* Performance of peer reviews (Section 9.0)The coordination and conduct of these activities was initiated and tracked by Entergy corporate leadership, which provided guidance to each Entergy site throughout the seismic walkdown program, including Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2. Entergy contracted with an outside nuclear services company to provide engineering and project management resources to supplement and assist each individual site. Each site had dedicated engineering contractors, supported by their own project management and technical oversight, who worked closely with plant personnel.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 8 of 34 4.0 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS The NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program involved the participation of numerous personnel with various responsibilities.

This section identifies the project team members and their project responsibilities, and provides brief experience summaries for each. Training certificates of those qualified as Seismic Walkdown Engineers are included in Attachment I.Table 4-1 summarizes the names and responsibilities of personnel used seismic walkdowns.

Experience summaries of each person follow.to conduct the Table 4-1 Equipment Seismic Licensing IPEEE Name Selection Walkdown Basis Personnel Engineer Reviewer Reviewer Richard Drake (ENTERGY)

X X Douglas Gaynor (ENTERGY)

X Richard Gioggia (ENTERGY)

X John Balletta (ENTERGY)

X1 Michael Koutsakos (ENTERGY)

X Michael Dries (ENTERGY)

X John Skonieczny (ENTERGY)

X Dragos Nuta (ENTERGY) x2 X X Nick Crispell (ENERCON)

X Paul Huebsch (ENERCON)

X Stephen Yuan (ENERCON)

X Kirt Parikh (ENERCON)

X Notes: 1.2.Plant operations representative Designated lead SWE Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 9 of 34 Richard Drake Mr. Richard Drake is the Civil/Structural Design Engineering Supervisor for Entergy Nuclear at the Indian Point Nuclear Plant. He has over 30 years of nuclear power generation experience, of which 18 years have been as an Indian Point Supervisor.

His broad experience includes design engineering activities associated with seismic qualification of components, piping and structures.

Mr. Drake is an EPRI trained Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Engineer as well as being trained in the EPRI NARE/STERI seismic qualification method. Mr. Drake is a registered Professional Engineer in both NY and NJ.Douglas Gaynor Mr. Douglas Gaynor is a Senior Lead Engineer for Entergy Nuclear at the Indian Point Energy Center, responsible for probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). He holds a Bachelor Degree and Master Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Manhattan College and has 38 years of experience in the nuclear industry, including over 25 years in the area of probabilistic safety assessment.

His nuclear experience also includes radiological and accident analysis, regulatory response and project coordination.

Richard Gioggia Mr. Gioggia is an Engineering III for the Entergy Nuclear at Indian Point Plant. He has a Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering from Manhattan College with 5 years of experience as a System Engineer at IPEC. He was also involved in the initial walkdowns for the Fukushima IER 11-1 responses for IPEC.John Balletta Mr. John Balletta is currently a Unit 2 Licensed SRO for Entergy Nuclear at Indian Point Energy Center. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Electrical Engineering from Manhattan College. He has 25 years of experience in the nuclear industry as an Instrument

& Controls (I&C) Technician, I&C Supervisor, Test Engineer, Control Room Supervisor, Field Support Supervisor, and Shift Technical Advisor. He has been in Operations for the past 17 years in various positions of responsibility.

Michael Koutsakos Mr. Michael Koutsakos is a Technical Specialist IV for the Main Steam Systems for Entergy Nuclear Northeast at Indian Points Energy Center. Mr. Koutsakos has an Associate of Applied Science Degree in Nuclear Technology, 27 years of nuclear experience at IPEC, 20 of which in the Operations Department including a Reactor Operators License. He has extensive knowledge of plant operations and procedures, accident and transient analysis and design bases functions of safety related SSC's.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 10 of 34 Michael Dries Mr. Michael Dries is a Senior Systems Engineer with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. and a staff Engineer at Indian Point Energy Center. He has over 38 years experience in the Nuclear Industry and has held this position in System Engineering for approximately 19 years. Roles and responsibilities include trending of system performance, maintenance effectiveness, evaluation of degraded operation, classification of system components and knowledge of component design and licensing basis. He has or has had responsibility for the Reactor Coolant System, Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System, Fuel Handling System, Instrument Air System and Station Air System. He holds a Master of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the New Jersey Institute of Technology.

John Skonieczny Mr. Skonieczny is a Senior Civil/Structural Engineer and licensed Professional Engineer in the state of New York. He is SQUG qualified and has been at IPEC for over 10 years.Paul Huebsch Mr. Huebsch has worked as an ENERCON Civil/Structural Engineer for the past 9 years, and has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Walkdowns on 09/13/2012.

He has a bachelor's degree and a master's degree with majors in structural engineering.

Mr. Huebsch has 47 years of structural engineering experience in the commercial, industrial and nuclear fields. He is an active professional engineer in the state of New Jersey and was previously licensed in 12 other states.Nick Crispell Mr. Crispell has worked as an ENERCON Civil/Structural Engineer for the past 4 years, and has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Walkdowns on 09/13/2012.

He has a bachelor's degree and a master's degree with majors in structural engineering.

Mr. Crispell has 9 years of structural engineering experience in residential, commercial, and the nuclear fields. He is an active professional engineer in the state of Georgia.Stephen Yuan Mr. Stephen Yuan, P.E. is assigned to the ENERCON New Jersey office as a Senior Civil Engineer.

Mr. Yuan has over 20 years of experience in structural computer modeling, design, rehabilitations, upgrading, electrical facility structure analyses and maintenance of industrial installations and nuclear power plants, including significant experience at Perry, Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee Plant. Mr. Yuan was one of the key civil engineers in support of the Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 11 of 34 transformer replacement project at Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Mr. Yuan holds a M.S. in Civil Engineering and PE in the states NY, NJ, PA, and NH.Kirit Parikh Mr. Parikh is a senior engineer assigned to the ENERCON New Jersey office as a Senior Civil Engineer.

Mr. Parikh has over 25 years of Civil/Mechanical design, field engineering, modifications, work package preparation and closure. He has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Walkdowns on 09/28/2012.

Draaos Nuta Mr. Dragos Nuta is a senior staff engineer for Entergy Nuclear at the Indian Point Energy Center and a Registered Professional Engineer.

He is a civil/structural engineer with over 30 years of experience in the nuclear industry.

He is a member of the ACI 349 Committee and a member of the ASCE Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Structures Committee.

Mr. Nuta is certified as a SQUG Seismic Capability Engineer and Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Engineer.4.1 EQUIPMENT SELECTION PERSONNEL A total of 7 individuals served as Equipment Selection Personnel

-see Table 4-1.4.2SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEERS A total of 5 individuals served as Seismic Walkdown Engineers

-see Table 4-1.4.3LICENSING BASIS REVIEWERS A total of 2 individuals served as Licensing Basis Reviewers

-see Table 4-1.4.4 IPEEE REVIEWERS One individual served as IPEEE Reviewer -see Table 4-1.Table 4-2 summarizes the names and responsibilities of personnel used to conduct peer reviews of the seismic walkdown program. Experience summaries of each person follow.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 12 of 34 Table 4-2 SWEL Peer Walkdown Licensing Submittal Name Reviewer Peer Basis Peer Report Peer Reviewer Reviewer Reviewer Thomas Panayotidi (ENERCON)

X X1 X1 Kenneth Whitmore (ENERCON)

X1 Pouria Pourghobadi (ENERCON)

X Richard Drake (ENTERGY)

X Maggie Farah (ENERCON)

X Notes: 1. Peer Review Team Leader Thomas Panavotidi Dr. Panayotidi has worked as an ENERCON Civil/Structural Consulting Engineer for the past year, and has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Seismic Walkdowns on 09/13/2012.

Dr. Panayotidi has a Doctorate of Engineering Science in Civil Engineering/Engineering Mechanics, with emphasis in finite element analysis, particularly for seismic and other dynamic loads. Dr. Panayotidi has over 30 years'experience as a Structural/Seismic Engineer in the nuclear field.Kenneth Whitmore Mr. Kenneth Whitmore is a senior structural engineer with ENERCON who has performed evaluations of structures at Perry, Oyster Creek, Humboldt Bay, Robinson, Millstone, Indian Point, Diablo Canyon, Grand Gulf, and St Lucie. Mr. Whitmore was the lead structural engineer for the Dry Fuel Storage designs at Grand Gulf and Robinson as well as performing analysis and design for dry fuel projects at Millstone, Diablo Canyon, Humboldt Bay and St.Lucie. Mr. Whitmore also performed structural analysis for security upgrade work at Robinson, Indian Point, Nine Mile Point and Fitzpatrick and structural assessments at Crystal River, Perry, St. Lucie and Davis Besse. Mr. Whitmore has been responsible for reviewing documents related to the seismic issues associated with several COL applications and for developing conceptual designs for balance of plant systems and components for proposed new nuclear plants, related to COL applications.

He is currently the lead structural engineer in the ENERCON Mt. Arlington, NJ office, responsible for continuing plant services and Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 13 of 34 completed the Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Seismic Walkdowns on 06/21/2012.

Pouria Pourqhobadi Mr. Pourghobadi is a civil/structural Engineer with ENERCON. Mr. Pourghobadi has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Seismic Walkdowns in 09/13/2012.

Mr. Pourghobadi has performed civil/structural engineering support to various nuclear facilities included steel and foundation analysis and design.Richard Drake Mr. Richard Drake is the Civil/Structural Design Engineering Supervisor for Entergy Nuclear at the Indian Point Nuclear Plant. He has over 30 years of nuclear power generation experience, of which 18 years have been as an Indian Point Supervisor.

His broad experience includes design engineering activities associated with seismic qualification of components, piping and structures.

Mr. Drake is an EPRI trained Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Engineer as well as being trained in the EPRI NARE/STERI seismic qualification method. Mr. Drake is a registered Professional Engineer in both NY and NJ.Maggie Farah Ms. Farah is a Civil/Structural Engineer in ENERCON's NJ office. She has over 4 years of experience performing structural analysis and design in nuclear industry.

Her experience includes developing and analyzing finite element models using a variety of software to aid the design of numerous structural components and systems. She is experienced in preparing design calculations and analysis of concrete and steel structures, conducting dynamic analyses of structures to resist seismic and hydrodynamic loads, designing various structural support systems to comply with regulations and restrictions at nuclear facilities.

Ms. Farah is an EPRI trained Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Engineer and was a Seismic Walkdown Engineer for Plant Farley.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 14 of 34 5.0 IPEEE VULNERABILITIES REPORTING During the IPEEE program in response to NRC Generic Letter 88-20 [Ref. 4], plant-specific seismic vulnerabilities were identified at many plants. In this context, "vulnerabilities" refers to conditions found during the IPEEE program related to seismic anomalies, outliers, or other findings.IPEEE Reviewers (see Section 4.4) reviewed the IPEEE final report [Ref. 5] and supporting documentation to identify items determined to present a seismic vulnerability by the IPEEE program. IPEEE Reviewers then reviewed additional plant documentation to identify the eventual resolutions to those seismic vulnerabilities not resolved via the completion of the IPEEE program.The seismic vulnerabilities identified for Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 during the IPEEE program are reported in Attachment A. As a result of the IPEEE analysis, the hold-down bolts on the CCW Surge Tank were replaced with high strength bolts.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 15 of 34 6.0SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LIST DEVELOPMENT This section summarizes the process used to select the SSCs that were included in the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) in accordance with Section 3 of the Guidance.

A team of equipment selection personnel with extensive knowledge of plant systems and components was selected to develop the SWEL. The SWEL is comprised of two groups of items: SWEL 1 consists of a sample of equipment required for safe shutdown of the reactor and to maintain containment integrity (i.e., supporting the five safety functions)

• SWEL 2 consists of items related to the spent fuel pool The final SWEL is the combination of SWELl and SWEL2. The development of these two groups is described in the following sections.6.1 SAMPLE OF REQUIRED ITEMS FOR THE FIVE SAFETY FUNCTIONS Safe shutdown of the reactor involves four safety functions:

• Reactor reactivity control (RRC)* Reactor coolant pressure control (RCPC)* Reactor coolant inventory control (RCIC)* Decay heat removal (DHR)Maintaining containment integrity is the fifth safety function:* Containment function (CF)The overall process for developing a sample of equipment to support these five safety functions is summarized in Figure 1-1 of the Guidance.

Figure 1-1 of the Guidance provides a screening method for selecting SSCs, starting with all of the plant SSCs and reducing the number based on a series of screening criteria.

The equipment coming out of Screen #3 and entering Screen #4 is defined as Base List 1. The equipment coming out of Screen #4 is the first Seismic Walkdown Equipment List, or SWEL 1. Development of these lists is described separately in the following sections.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 16 of 34 6.1.1 Base List 1 Based on Figure 1-1 and Section 3 of the Guidance, Base List 1 should represent a set of Seismic Category (SC) I equipment or systems that support the five safety functions.

Base List 1 was derived from both the IPEEE equipment list and the USI-A46 equipment list. The portion of the IP2 IPEEE addressing seismic events used a probabilistic risk analysis rather than a seismic margins approach to address beyond design basis events. Since the analysis provided an integrated assessment of the plant, it inherently addressed the five safety functions.

The objective of the USI-A46 program was to develop a list of equipment that will provide safe shutdown of the reactor and maintain a safe stable state in response to a design basis earthquake.

The USI-A46 equipment list was also used as a starting point for the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Base List 1. Base List 1 is presented as Table 1 in Attachment B, and has 986 total items.6.1.2 SWEL 1 Based on Figure 1-1 and Section 3 of the Guidance, SWEL 1 should represent a diverse population of items on Base List 1 including representative items from some of the variations within each of five sample selection attributes.

Additionally, the selection of SWEL 1 items includes consideration of the importance of the contribution to risk for the SSCs. Equipment Selection Personnel (see Section 4.1) developed SWEL 1 using an iterative process. The following paragraphs describe how the equipment selected for inclusion on the final SWEL 1 are representative with respect to each of the five sample selection attributes while also considering risk significance.

In general, preference for inclusion on SWEL 1 was given to items that are accessible and have visible anchorage while still maintaining the sample selection attributes.

SWEL 1 is presented as Table 2 in Attachment B, and has 101 total items.Variety of Types of Systems Items were selected from Base List 1 ensuring that each of the five safety functions was well represented.

Additionally, components from a variety of frontline and support systems, as listed in Appendix E of the Guidance, were selected.

The system type of each item on SWEL 1 is listed on Table 2 of Attachment B.Maior New and Replacement Equipment The Equipment Selection Personnel, and the Configuration Management Group, with assistance from plant operations, identified items on Base List 1 which are either major Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 17 of 34 new or replacement equipment installed within the past 15 years, or have been modified or upgraded recently.

These items are designated as such on Base List 1 on Table 1 of Attachment B. A robust sampling of these items is represented on SWEL 1.Variety of Equipment Types According to Appendix B of the Guidance, there are 22 classes of mechanical and electrical equipment.

The items on Base List 1 were classified accordingly and the total number from each class was determined.

Items were then selected from Base List 1 ensuring that each of the equipment classes represented there was also represented on SWEL 1 in approximately the same ratios. The equipment class of each item on SWEL 1 is listed on Table 1 of Attachment B. Note that SWEL 1 does not include Class 3, medium voltage, metal clad switchgear components, because this class of equipment does not exist on the Unit 2 site.Variety of Environments Items were selected from Base List 1 located in a variety of buildings, rooms, and elevations.

These item locations included environments that were both inside and outside, as well as having high temperature and/or elevated humidity and within containment.

Items that were part of borated systems were included as well. The location and environment of each item on SWEL 1 is listed on Table 1 of Attachment B.IPEEE Enhancements With assistance from IPEEE Reviewers, Equipment Selection Personnel identified items on Base List 1 which were enhanced as a result of seismic vulnerabilities identified during the IPEEE program (see Section 5.0). Such items are designated as such on Base List 1 on Table 1 of Attachment B and are represented on SWELl.Risk Significance Information from the plant Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) model and the Maintenance Rule implementation documentation were used to determine whether items were risk significant.

Where otherwise comparable items could be chosen relative to the sample selection attributes, the item with higher risk significance was chosen.6.2SPENT FUEL POOL ITEMS The overall process for developing a sample of SSCs associated with the spent fuel pool (SFP) is similar to that of the screening process for SWEL 1 and is summarized in Figure 1-2 of the Guidance.

The equipment coming out of Screen #2 and entering Screen #3 is defined as Base List 2. The items coming out of Screen #4 are the items that could potentially cause Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 18 of 34 the SFP to drain rapidly. The items coming out of either Screen #3 or Screen #4 are the second Seismic Walkdown Equipment List, or SWEL 2. Development of these lists is described separately in the following sections.6.2.1 Base List 2 Based on Figure 1-2 and Section 3 of the Guidance, Base List 2 should represent the Seismic Category I equipment or systems associated with the SFP. To develop Base List 2, Equipment Selection Personnel (see Section 4.1) reviewed plant design and licensing basis documentation and plant drawings for the SFP and its associated cooling system Base List 2 is presented as Table 3 in Attachment B, and has 10 total items.6.2.2 Rapid Drain-Down Rapid drain-down is defined as unintentionally lowering the water level to the top of the fuel assemblies within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> after an earthquake.

Consistent with the Guidance, the Equipment Selection Personnel (see Section 4.1) identified SSCs that could cause the SFP to drain rapidly by first reviewing the SFP documentation to identify penetrations below about 10 ft above the top of the fuel assemblies.

This review assessed the hydraulic lines and connected equipment of each such penetration for potentially seismically-induced failure modes that could lead to rapid drain down. The list of SSCs that could cause rapid drain-down is presented as Table 4 in Attachment B which includes the specific basis for determining which SSCs could or could not cause rapid drain-down.

The rapid drain-down list has a total of 3 items.6.2.3 SWEL 2 Based on Figure 1-2 and Section 3 of the Guidance, SWEL 2 is a broad population of items on Base List 2 including representative items from some of the variations within each of four sample selection attributes (using sample process similar to SWEL 1), plus each item that could potentially cause rapid-drain down of the SFP. Due to the population of items on Base List 2 being much smaller than Base List 1, the sampling attributes are satisfied differently for SWEL 2 than for SWEL 1. The following paragraphs describe how the equipment selected from Base List 2 for inclusion on SWEL 2 are representative with respect to each of the four sample selection attributes.

SWEL 2 is presented as Table 5 in Attachment B, and has 7 total items; of these, 7 items are selected from Base List 2, and none are from the rapid drain-down list because these items fall into one of the following categories:

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 19 of 34* Routinely disassembled, inspected and reassembled every refueling outage and excluded per FAQ 3.17 of Reference 2* Routinely inspected every refueling outage and excluded per FAQ 3.16 of Reference 2 Not accessible (in Spent Fuel Pool) and additionally are in the category of piping, not equipment or component.

Variety of Types of Systems There are 4 systems associated with SFP cooling. The four systems are defined as cooling, purification, structure and overhead items which could potentially damage the pool components.

Each of these systems with the exception of structure is well-represented on the SWEL2 list. Structure has been eliminated from the SWEL2 list based on routine inspection, accessibility and category (i.e. item is piping, not equipment or component) as identified in Attachment B.Major New and Replacement Equipment With the exception of the Ederer crane, there have been no major new or replacement equipment installations within the past 15 years associated with the SFP. Therefore, this sampling attribute is not applicable.

Variety of Equipment Types There are 3 different equipment classes represented on Base List 2: 0, 5 and 21.Each of these equipment classes is represented on SWEL 2.Variety of Environments All SFP components are nearby and are thus located in similar environments.

Therefore, this sampling attribute is not applicable.

6.31DEFERRED INACCESSIBLE ITEMS on SWEL Each item on the SWEL shall be walked down as part of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program. In order to perform the seismic walkdowns of these items, it is necessary to have access to them and to be able to view their anchorage.

In some cases, it was not feasible to gain access to the equipment or view its anchorage because Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 was at power during the entire 180-day response period of Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f)Letter. For these cases, walkdowns of these items have been deferred until the next refueling outage (RFO) in March/April of 2014. *An updated submittal report incorporating these deferred walkdowns will be provided in June of 2014.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 20 of 34 Deferred items are summarized in the table below. The reason for deferral is identified as either ACC (indicating that the item is inaccessible while the plant is at power) or CAB (indicating that the item requires opening cabinet/panel doors which was not permitted by Plant Operations personnel during the walkdown period, due to being energized or otherwise).

A total of 31 items are deferred; of these, 12 are in inaccessible areas, and 20 are cabinets/panels required to be opened. Of the above, one deferred item is both inaccessible and needs cabinets opened.SWEL# Equipment ID Description Location Reason SWELl-006 MCC-26A 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-O" CAB SWELl-007 MCC-26AA 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-0" CAB SWELl-008 MCC-26B 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-0" CAB SWELl-009 MCC-26BB 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-0" CAB SWELl-010 MCC-27A 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-0" CAB SWELl -011 MCC-29 480 VAC MCC CB EL.33'-0" CAB SWELl-012 MCC-26C 480 VAC MCC CB EL.33'-0" CAB SWELl-015 52/RTA REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A CB EL.33'-0" CAB SWELl -063 IBUS21 118 VAG INSTRUMENT BUS CB EL.53'-0" 21 ACC SWELl-064 DPNL22 125 VDC DISTRIBUTION CB EL.53'-0" CAB PANEL 22 PC4 STATIC INVERTER #23 SWELl-067 EDC1 SAIINETR#3 CB EL.33'-0" CAB MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH SWELl-072 M19 BATTERY CHARGER 21 CB EL.33'-0" CAB SWELl-073 EGA3 BATTERY CHARGER 24 CB EL.33'-0" CAB SWELl-074 EGA1 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER CB EL.33'-0" CAB#21 SWELl-075 EGA8 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER CB EL.33'-0 CAB#23 SWELl-076 0021EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 EDG EL.72'-0" CAB Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 21 of 34 SWEL# Equipment ID Description Location Reason SWELl-077 0022EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 EDG EL.72'-0" CAB SWELl-078 0023EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 EDG EL.72'-0" CAB EDG BLDG 72' EL ENGINE SWELl -081 IP2-EDGB-72-DB6 AUXILARIEL PANE EDG EL.72'-0" CAB AUXILIARIES CTRL PANEL SWELl-087 PNL PP9 EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL EDG EL.72'-O" CAB SWELl-082 INST RK 19 INSTRUMENT RACK 19 VC EL.68'-0" ACC SWELl-083 INST RK 21 INSTRUMENT RACK 21 VC EL.68'-0" ACC SWELl-086 TE-122 EXCESS LETDOWN TEMP VCI EL.46'-O" ACC ELEMENT SWELl-101 21AT 21 SIS ACCUMULATOR VC EL.46'-0" ACC SWELl-003 22AT 22 SIS ACCUMULATOR VC EL.46'-O" ACC SWELl -033 22RP 22 RECIRC PUMP VC EL.46'-0" ACC SWELl-052 0021CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN VC EL.68'-O" ACC 21 SWELl-053 0022CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN VC EL.68'-0" ACC 22 SWELl-054 0023CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN VC EL.68'-0" ACC 23 SWELl-055 0024CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN VC EL.68'-0" ACC 24 SWELl-056 0025CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN VC EL.68'-0" ACC 25 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 22 of 34 7.0SEISMIC WALKDOWNS AND AREA WALK-BYS The NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program, conducted in accordance with the Guidance, involves two primary walkdown activities:

Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys.

These activities were conducted at Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 by teams of a minimum of two trained and qualified Seismic Walkdown Engineers (SWEs) (see Section 4.2). Each team included one engineer with at least several years of experience in seismic design and qualification of nuclear power plant SSCs. A total of five individuals forming SWE teams of two or three individuals were used. One of the individuals was a member of the site Engineering group. The teams periodically "shuffled" personnel to cross-check consistency between the SWEs and to ensure that lessons learned were being shared. SWE teams were occasionally accompanied into the field by Plant Operations personnel to open cabinets.The seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys were conducted over the course of 3.5 weeks during October of 2012. Each morning, a pre-job brief with all personnel involved was conducted.

This pre-job brief was used to outline the components and areas that would be walked down that day, to ensure consistency between the teams, to reinforce expectations, to identifying potential personnel safety issues specific to that day, and to allow team members to ask questions and share lessons learned in the field. The SWE teams brought cameras, tape measures, flashlights, mirrors and calipers into the field to assist with the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys.7.1 SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Seismic walkdowns were performed in accordance with Section 4 of the Guidance for all items on the SWEL (SWEL 1 plus SWEL 2), except for those determined to be inaccessible and deferred (see Section 6.3). To document the results of the walkdown, Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) with the same content as that included in Appendix C of the Guidance was created for each item. Additionally, where permitted by Plant Operations and plant procedures, photographs were taken of each item and included on the corresponding SWC.Prior to performance of the walkdowns, documentation packages were developed that contained the pre-filled SWC and other pertinent information including the location drawings, response spectra information, previous IPEEE seismic walkdown documentation, current operability evaluations affecting SWEL items, SQUG packages where available and anchorage drawings where applicable.

These documentation packages were brought with the SWE teams into the plant during the seismic walkdowns.

Walkdown inspections focused on anchorages and seismic spatial interactions, but also included inspections for other potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Anchorage, in all cases, was considered to specifically mean anchorage of the component to the structure.

This Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 23 of 34 included anchor bolts to concrete walls or floors, structural bolts to structural steel and welds to structural steel or embedded plates. For welds, the walkdown team looked for cracks and corrosion in the weld and base metal. Other bolts or connections, such as flange bolts on in-line components were not considered as equipment anchorage.

The bolts and connections were evaluated by the SWEs and any potential adverse seismic concerns were documented under "other adverse seismic conditions" rather than under "anchorage".

Thus, components with no attachments to the structure are considered as not having anchorage.

Nevertheless, the attachment of these components to other equipment was evaluated and inspected for potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Cabinets/panels on the SWEL that could be reasonably opened without presenting safety or operational hazards were opened during the walkdown.

This allowed visual observation of internal anchorage to the structure (where present), as well as inspection for "other adverse seismic conditions" related to internal components (if it could be observed without breaking the plane of the equipment opening).

Where opening the cabinet/panel exhibited undue safety or operational hazards, it was considered inaccessible and the completion of the walkdown of that item was deferred to a later time (see Section 6.3). Where opening the cabinet/panel required extensive disassembly (e.g., doors or panels were secured by more than latches, thumbscrews, or similar), justification for how the inspection met the program goal without opening the cabinet/panel was included on the SWC and the walkdown of that item is considered complete.In addition to the general inspection requirements, at least 50% of the SWEL items having anchorage required confirmation that the anchorage configuration was consistent with plant documentation.

Of the 108 SWEL items (SWELl plus SWEL2), 100 were considered to have anchorage (i.e., removing in-line/line-mounted components).

Of these 100 anchored components, the walkdowns of 56 included anchorage configuration verification, which is greater than 50%. When anchorage configuration verification was conducted, the specific plant documentation used for comparison to the as-found conditions was referenced on the SWC.The SWC for each SWEL item where a seismic walkdown has been initiated is included in Attachment C. The SWEL items that have "ACC" designations in Section 6.3 are not contained in Attachment C in this revision of the report. For the combined SWELl and SWEL2 list, a total of 95 SWCs are attached, 54 with completion status marked "Y" and 41 with completion status marked "U". The designation "Y" indicates that the walkdown is complete and all required information has been collected.

There is no need to revisit the item.The designation "U" indicates that the SWEL walkdown is incomplete and the item must be revisited to obtain additional information.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 24 of 34 Thirteen SWCs are fully deferred.

SWCs considered and marked incomplete are those where a walkdown was initiated, but whose completion was ultimately deferred because the cabinet/panel could not be opened during the walkdown period. Therefore, the 54 completed SWCs represent the completed walkdowns of each SWEL item accessible during the walkdown period.7.2 AREA WALK-BYS Seismic area walk-bys were performed in accordance with Section 4 of the Guidance for all plant areas containing items on the SWEL (SWEL 1 plus SWEL 2), except for those SWEL items located in plant areas inaccessible during the walkdown period (see Section 6.3). Area walk-bys were not deferred where components were deferred simply to open cabinets/panels.

A separate Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) with the same content as that included in Appendix C of the Guidance was used to document the results of each area walk-by performed.

Where permitted by Plant Operations, photographs were taken of each area, and included on the corresponding SWC.Area walk-bys were conducted once for plant areas containing more than one SWEL item. In cases where the room or area containing a component was very large, the extent of the area encompassed by the area walk-by was limited to a radius of approximately 35 ft around the subject equipment.

The extent of the areas included in the area walk-bys is described on the AWC for that area. Because certain areas contained more than one SWEL item, there are fewer total area walk-bys conducted than seismic walkdowns.

A total of 36 area walk-bys was necessary to cover all plant areas containing at least one accessible SWEL item.The AWC for each area walk-by completed is included in Attachment D. A total of 36 AWCs are attached, which represent all of the areas containing SWEL items that were accessible during the walkdown period. An estimated additional 11 area walk-bys of areas inside containment and in the Control Room will be completed together with the deferred walkdowns for those inaccessible items (see Section 6.3).

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 25 of 34 8.0 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATIONS During the course of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys, the objective of the SWE teams was to identify existing degraded, non-conforming, or unanalyzed plant conditions with respect to its current seismic licensing basis. This section summarizes the process used to handle conditions identified, what conditions were found, and how they were treated for eventual resolution.

8.1 CONDITION IDENTIFICATION When an unusual condition was observed by a SWE team in the field, the condition was noted on the SWC or AWC form and briefly discussed between the two SWEs to agree upon whether it was a potentially adverse seismic condition.

These initial conclusions were based on conservative engineering judgment and the training required for SWE qualification.

For conditions that were reasonably judged as insignificant to seismic response, the disposition was included on the SWC or AWC checklist and the appropriate question was marked "Y", indicating that no associated potentially adverse seismic condition was observed.Unusual or uncertain conditions were reported to site personnel for further resolution through the Corrective Action Program (CAP) (see Section 8.2). A total of 88 seismically insignificant conditions were identified.

These conditions were generally related to housekeeping.

For conditions that were judged as potentially significant to seismic response, the condition was photographed, and the appropriate question on the SWC or AWC was marked "N" indicating that a potentially adverse seismic condition was observed.

The condition was then immediately reported to site personnel for further resolution and was documented for reporting in Attachment E. A total of 51 potentially adverse seismic conditions were identified.

These conditions were generally related to housekeeping (22), non-conforming anchorage (7), spatial interaction (22), or inadequate line flexibility (0).8.2 CONDITION RESOLUTION Conditions observed during the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys determined to be potentially adverse seismic conditions are summarized in Attachment E, including how each condition has been addressed and its current status. Each potentially adverse seismic condition is addressed either with a Licensing Basis Evaluation (LBE) to determine whether it requires entry into the CAP, or by entering it into the CAP directly.

The decision to conduct a LBE or enter the condition directly into the CAP was made on a case-by-case basis, based on the perceived efficiency of each process for eventual resolution of each specific condition.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 26 of 34 Unusual conditions that were not seismically significant were entered into the CAP directly.Further resolution of these conditions is not tracked or reported as part of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program, except by noting the CR numbers generated on the applicable SWCs and AWCs.8.3LICENSING BASIS EVALUATIONS Potentially adverse seismic conditions identified as part of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program may be evaluated by comparison to the current licensing basis of the plant as it relates to the seismic adequacy of the equipment in question, as is described in Section 5 of the Guidance.

If the identified condition is consistent with existing seismic documentation associated with that item, then no further action is required.

If the identified condition cannot easily be shown to be consistent with existing seismic documentation, or no seismic documentation exists, then the condition is entered into the CAP.Of the 51 identified potentially adverse seismic conditions, 14 LBEs were performed.

Each LBE performed is documented consistently, and included in Attachment F. The results of these LBEs with respect to the associated potentially adverse seismic conditions are summarized in Attachment E. A total of 18 potentially adverse seismic conditions evaluated using a LBE were dispositioned and required no further action due to seismic concerns.8.4CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM ENTRIES Conditions identified during the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys that required further resolution were entered into the plant's CAP. These were reviewed in accordance with the plant's existing processes and procedures for an eventual disposition.

Conditions entered into the CAP included three types of unusual conditions identified:

• Seismically insignificant unusual conditions

• Potentially adverse seismic condition that does not pass a LBE* Potentially adverse seismic condition that bypasses a LBE A total of 57 Condition Reports (CRs) were generated from the CAP as a result of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program. Of these, 2 CRs were generated to hold License Basis Evaluations.

Several of the CRs addressed similar conditions at a variety of locations or addressed multiple conditions at a single location.

For this reason, some CRs addressed both insignificant seismic issues and potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Of the 57 CRs noted above, the majority (38) was exclusively for seismically insignificant unusual conditions, 6 contained both seismically insignificant and potentially adverse seismic conditions and 13 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 27 of 34 CRs were related exclusively to potentially adverse seismic conditions

.The CR numbers, current status, and resolution (where applicable and available) are summarized for these potentially adverse seismic conditions in Attachment E.8.5 PLANT CHANGES The CAP entries (CRs) generated by the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program are being resolved in accordance with the plant CAP process, including operability evaluations, extent of condition evaluations, and root cause analysis (where applicable).

Initial evaluations indicate that no immediate plant changes are necessary.

Final and complete resolutions of the CRs for seismically insignificant unusual conditions and potentially adverse seismic conditions will determine if future modifications to the plant are required.

While no immediate plant modifications have been identified as a result of the seismic walkdowns and walk-bys, various cases were found where repairs are required or housekeeping issues are being addressed.

Current status and resolutions (where applicable and available) for CRs related to potentially adverse seismic conditions are provided in Attachment E.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 28 of 34 9.0 PEER REVIEW.9.1 PEER REVIEW PROCESS The peer review for the NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns was performed in accordance with Section 6 of the Guidance.

The peer review included an evaluation of the following activities:

review of the selection of the structures, systems, and components, (SSCs) that are included in the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL);review of a sample of the checklists prepared for the Seismic Walkdowns and area walk-bys;review of licensing basis evaluations and decisions for entering the potentially adverse conditions in to the plant's Corrective Action Plan (CAP); and review of the final submittal report.At least two members of the peer review team (see Table 4.2) were involved in the peer review of each activity, the team member with the most relevant knowledge and experience taking the lead for that particular activity.

A designated overall Peer Review Team Leader provided oversight related to the process and technical aspects of the peer review, paying special attention to the interface between peer review activities involving different members of the peer review team.This section summarizes the process and results of each peer review activity.9.2 PEER REVIEW OF SEISMIC WALKDOWNS AND WALK-BYS The following sections summarize the process and results of each peer review activity.9.2.1 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List Development The peer review of SWEL follows Section 3 of the EPRI guidance.Since periodic inspections of Seismic Class I (SC-I) structures are routinely performed to monitor and control their structural degradation, SC-I structures were excluded from the equipment list. For similar reasons, SC-I piping and containment penetrations were also excluded.Review of the SWEL confirms that various classes of equipment, as identified under the IPEEE Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL) were considered.

The classes, ranging from 0 to 21, are summarized in Appendix B of the EPRI guidance.

Base List 1 included 986 components.

From these, 101 components, representing a variety of Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 29 of 34 process systems such as Chemical and Volume Control, High/Low Pressure Recirculation/Injection, Auxiliary Feedwater, Emergency Boration, Residual Heat Removal, and others, were selected.

Each component was screened in accordance with the EPRI guidance (screens 1 thru 4) to ensure that it satisfied at least one of the five safety functions:

1) Reactor Reactivity Control 2) Reactor Coolant Pressure Control 3) Reactor Coolant Inventory Control 4) Decay Heat Removal 5) Containment Integrity In addition, a variety of environmental conditions (high/low temperature, humidity;indoor versus outdoor, boration system), whether the item was a major new or replacement equipment since IPEEE implementation, whether the item was previously identified as a IPEEE vulnerability, and whether the item's failure would constitute a severe and immediate threat to safe operation of the plant (high risk), were considered during the final selection for SWEL-1.There were ten Spent Fuel Pool related components, as shown in Attachment B, Table 3, and three Rapid-Draw-Down related components, as shown in Attachment B, Table 4, selected for Base 2 List. The Rapid-Draw-Down components were excluded from further consideration because the Fuel Transfer Tube Blind Flange (IP2) and Fuel Transfer Canal Weir Gate (IP2) are routinely inspected, and the abandoned 4" Pipe Penetration (IP2), although inaccessible within the Spent Fuel Pool, is not a"component" or "equipment", but is part of the "structure".

A variety of environments and equipment classes were then considered, and the final SWEL-2, consisting of seven items, was formed.The comments made by the reviewers of the SWEL were mostly editorial; others were made to request clarification

("Are the 50% anchorage verification items indicated on the SWEL?" The answer was "Yes"). One reviewer asked why there were no IPEEE vulnerabilities reflected on the SWEL. The answer was that there were no "findings" after the IPEEE implementation for Unit 2. However, hold-down bolts on the CCW Surge Tank were upgraded to high strength bolts to increase seismic resistance.

In essence, this Peer Review of the SWEL confirms that preparation of the SWEL was conducted with extreme care, paying particular attention to the sampling process, to assure that a variety of systems, components, environments and risk insights associated with safe operation of the plant, have been implemented.

The peer review checklist of the SWEL is provided in Attachment G.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 30 of 34 9.2.2 Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys Peer review of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys was conducted by two peer reviewers, each of whom is a qualified SWE and has broad knowledge of seismic engineering applied to nuclear power plants. One of the peer reviewers participated in the seismic walkdown program for a different utility, and the other is engaged with the industry team which developed the Guidance (see Section 4.2). The peer reviews were conducted at the Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 concurrent with the conduct of walkdowns, at approximately 50% completion.

The peer review was performed as follows:* The peer review team reviewed the walkdown packages (including checklists, photos, drawings, etc.) for SWEL items already completed to ensure that the checklists were completed in accordance with the Guidance.

A total of 23 SWC and 5 AWC forms were reviewed, each representing approximately 23% of their respective totals. In the context of the Guidance, the peer review team considered the number of walkdown packages reviewed to be appropriate.

The packages reviewed represent a variety of equipment types in various plant areas. Specific SWC forms reviewed are SWEL1-013, SWEL 1-014, SWEL 1-015, SWEL 1-016 SWEL 1-017, SWEL 1-018, SWEL 1-019, SWEL 1-024, SWEL 1-032, SWEL 1-035, SWEL 1-036, SWEL 1-047, SWEL 1-051, SWEL 1-059, SWEL 1-060, SWEL 1-061, SWEL 1-065, SWEL 1-066, SWEL 1-068, SWEL 1-084, SWEL 1-089, SWEL 1-099, and SWEL 1-100. Specific AWC forms reviewed are AWC-02, AWC-04, AWC-06, AWC-04, and AWC-07. While reviewing the walkdown packages, the peer reviewers conducted informal interviews of the SWEs and asked clarifying questions to verify that they were conducting walkdowns and area walk-bys in accordance with the Guidance.* The peer review team held a meeting with the SWE teams to provide feedback on the walkdown and walk-by packages reviewed and the informal interviews, and discuss potential modifications to the documentation packages in the context of the Guidance." Each peer reviewer accompanied each SWE team into the field and observed them perform a walkdown of a SWEL component and its associated area walk-by.During these observations, the peer reviewers asked clarifying questions to verify the walkdown and walk-by process being followed was in accordance with the Guidance.

The item walked down under the observation of a peer reviewer is SWELl-32.

The associated area walk-by performed under the observation of a peer reviewer is AWC-12, Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 31 of 34 The peer review team held a meeting with the SWE teams to provide feedback on the walkdown and walk-by observations, and discuss how lessons learned from review of the walkdown packages had been incorporated into the walkdown process.As a result of the peer review activities, the SWE teams modified their documentation process to include additional clarifying details, particularly related to checklist questions marked "N/A" and where conditions were observed but judged as insignificant.

The peer review team felt these modifications would be of benefit for future reviews of checklists incorporated into the final report. These modifications were recommended following review of the walkdown and area walk-by packages, and the observation walkdowns and area walk-bys demonstrated that the SWEs understood the recommendations and were incorporating them into the walkdown and area walk-by process. Previously completed checklists were revised to reflect lessons learned from the peer review process.Based on completion of the walkdown and walk-by peer review activities described, the peer review team concludes that the SWE teams are familiar with and followed the process for conducting seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys in accordance with the Guidance.

The SWE teams adequately demonstrated their ability to identify potentially adverse seismic conditions such as adverse anchorage, adverse spatial interaction, and other adverse conditions related to anchorage, and perform anchorage configuration verifications, where applicable.

The SWEs also demonstrated the ability to identify seismically-induced flooding interactions and seismically-induced fire interactions such as the examples described in Section 4 of the Guidance.

The SWEs demonstrated appropriate use of self checks and peer checks. They discussed their observations with a questioning attitude, and documented the results of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys on appropriate checklists.

9.2.3 Licensing Basis Evaluations A peer review was completed of the licensing basis evaluations provided in Attachment F and the corresponding summary sheet provided in Attachment E. The majority of the licensing basis evaluations provided immediate resolution to operability concerns of the potentially adverse conditions identified by the walkdown personnel.

Within these licensing basis evaluations, CRs were generated for maintenance issues to replace missing bolts, nuts or remove items for housekeeping issues, or to provide further, detailed resolution of the potentially adverse seismic condition.

The remaining licensing basis evaluations were created to document potentially adverse seismic conditions that were immediately entered into the CAP for detailed evaluation and investigation.

The peer review of these LBEs ensured that all the information provided Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 32 of 34 from the walkdown team to the licensing basis evaluation team member provided enough detail for accurate and timely resolution.

9.2.4 Submittal Report The peer reviewer was provided with an early draft of this submittal report for peer review. The peer reviewer verified that the submittal report met the objectives and requirements of Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f) Letter, and documented the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program performed in accordance with the Guidance.

The peer reviewer provided the results of review activities to the SWE team for consideration.

The SWE team satisfactorily addressed all peer review comments in the final version of the submittal report. The signature of the Peer Review Team Leader provides documentation that all elements of the peer review as described in Section 6 of the Guidance were completed.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 33 of 34

10.0 REFERENCES

1. 10CFR50.54(f)

Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012 2. EPRI 1025286, Seismic Walkdown Guidance for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, June 2012 3. Indian Point 2 UFSAR Revision 22 4. Generic Letter No. 88-20, Supplement 4, Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities

5. Individual Plant Examination of External Events for Indian Point Unit No. 2 Nuclear Generating Station, December 1995 6. Generic Letter No. 87-03, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 7. Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) Procedure:

Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment, Revision 3A, December 2001 8. EPRI-NP-5228-SL, Revision 1, Seismic Verification of Equipment Anchorage 9. NUREG-1407, Procedural and Submittal Guidance of the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities

10. EN-DC-168, Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walk-down Procedure Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 34 of 34 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A -IPEEE VULNERABILITIES TABLE ATTACHMENT B -SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LISTS ATTACHMENT C -SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCs)ATTACHMENT D -AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs)ATTACHMENT E -POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS ATTACHMENT F -LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS ATTACHMENT G -PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL ATTACHMENT H -REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESOLUTIONS FORM ATTACHMENT I -SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page A-1 of 2 ATTACHMENT A -IPEEE VULNERABILITIES

SUMMARY

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page A-2 of 2 AT-IACHMENT 9.3 IPEEE VULNERABILITIES TABLE FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 2 A#.'. PEEE.E VUNERABILITY'

-.. C --'OMMITMENT.

..""- RESOLUTION

• " CMP RESOLVED A sensitivity study was performed to examine the potential core During the course of the seismic IPEEE effort, it was determined damage frequency reduction if several bolts on the CCW surge tank that, although the Component Cooling Water Surge Tank met its V-01 supports were replaced with high strength bolts. Such a modification design basis, the capacity of the tank to withstand beyond design The hold-down bolts of the CCW Surge Tank were replaced with y 1995 would strengthen the surge tank such that it would be screened out basis seismic events was limited by the capacity of the hold down high strength bolts.of the analysis based on high seismic capacity (greater than 1.5g bolts. As a result of this IPEEE finding, those hold down bolts were median acceleration and OSg HCLPF). to be replaced by higher tensile strength bolts.Prepared by: Dragos Nuta 1 -. A K Dae 1/20 Date: 11/08/2012 I "I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-1 of 42 ATTACHMENT B -SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LISTS Table 1 Base List 1 SCREEN SCREEN 2 SCREENA., SCREEN4 Fioe Safety Function.... --..,...*.. ................

..".. ...'s ,a .co :.x W .EgJE 7 ... l..... .O1 c=,= .. .c.O.. .S?"' SSW P4 QU L SS E PUljWý SOLEj EN .i .N -~o F 4 Regu P- Ivetr 2 OO -Genc leper Form 21CHPD 21CHPD CHARGING PUMP NO. 21 PULSATION DAMPENER YES NO YES NO I B xt 2 55 -Gnene leer Poem 2tSWPS T21SWPS NO 21 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC YS N E E OO__ -GnnlptFr 1WS 101WS STRAINER YS N E E 2 00 -Generic lnpu Form 22CHPD 0022CHPD CHARGING PUMP NO. 21 PULSATION DAMPENER YES NO YES NO I B e x 2 S0 -Generic input Form 21SWPS 0021SWPS NO 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMrATIC YES NO YES YES I 14_______STRAINER NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC 00 G ...erc Input Form 22SWPS 0022S3WPS STRAINER YES NO YES YES 0 HI x 2 US -Genenc Input Form 23CHPD 0023CHPD CHARGING PUMP NO 23 PULSATION DAMPENER YES NO YES NO I N 2 00 Goneric lepu Form 23SNWPS 5Q23SWP5 NO. 23 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC YES NO YES YES 0 14 STRAINER 2 00 Generic Input Form 24SWPS 0024SWPS NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC YES NO YES YES 0 H x STRAINER 2 00 Genec Irrper Form 25SWPS 0025SWPS NO.25 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC OO Geedcinut orm 25WPS 002SWS SRAIERYES NO YES YESO *______ TRAINER 2 00- Genenc lnper Form 26SWPS 0026SWPS NO. 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC YES NO YES YES 0 H STRAINER 2 US -Generic Input Form BAB BRC ACD BLNDR BORIC ACID BLENDER YES NO YES NO I B 2 01 -Motor Control Cetern MCC24 MCC 24 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I

• 0

• 0 x 2 01 -Motor Conrrol Center MCC24A MCC 24A 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I 0x

• x 2 01 -Motor Control Centerm MCC26A MCC-26A 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES YES I N x N 2 01 -Motor Control Centers MCC26RA MCC-26AA 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES YES I x 0 *2 01 Motor Control Centers MCC26B MCC-26B 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I *x

• x 2 01 -Moto, Control Ceneres MCC26BB MCC.26BB 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I N x 2 01 -Moror Control Centerm MCC26C MCC-26C 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I *x N 0x 2 SI -Motor Control Centrer- MCC27 MCC-27 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I x Nx 0x 2 01 -Motor Control Ceernee MCC27A MCC-27A 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I

• N x 2 1 -Meore Control Cenersr MCC2B MCC-28 480 YAC MCC YES NO YES NO I N Y E S 2 01 -Motor, Control Ceters MCC28A MCC-28A 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I 0 x 0 x 2 01 -Motor Control Cesrem MCC2A MCC-2A 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I x N x x 2 01 Motor Control Cenreno MCC29A MCC-29A 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I x *x 0 2 02 -Le Voltage Swthg.eear ALB REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A & B SWITCHGEAR YES NO YES NO I 2 02 -Lor cIrtage Swtchgear AL8 REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A & B SWVITCHGEAR YES NO YES NO I 2 02 -Low Voltage Switchgear ALS REACTOR TRIP BY-PASS SWITCHGEAR A & 8 YES NO YES NO I *2 02 -Low Voltage Swireareo AL9 REACTOR TRIP BY-PASS SWITCHGEAR A & B YES NO YES NO I 2 02 -Low Voltae Switchgear BUS 2A BUS 2A 480 VAC SWITCHGEAR 22 BUS 2A YES NO YES NO I xx xK*2 02 -Low Vollage Decogoar BUS 3A BUS 3A 480 SAC SWITCHGEAR BUS 3A YES NO YES NO I x x x0 2 02 -Low Vetn To Swi~tChat RUS SA BUS SA 480 VAC SWITCHGEAR 21 BUS TA YES NO YES NO I x Kx 0N Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-2 of 42 S NC.EEN -REEN,; SCREEN.3.

SCREEN4 Fier Safety Fuontam... ..... " ... LZ.':. .' " ... .... " ... ... IEE.*. ..Tm~p Bon ed ontrl Corol Conrol C ntimrim...

n sNN? .2 02 -Low Volta9e Smtchgear BUS 6A BUS 6A 480 VAG SW IT CHGEAR 22 BUS 6A YES NO YES NO I xx 2 0T7PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #23 YS N 4.TrnsformersBBB7 TRANSFORMERE NYES YES 2 ( L Tragsformer a BBU BB8 PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER YES NO YES YES I x 2 54 Tralo s BAT BBT PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP B22 YES NO TES YES I TRANSFORMER 2 04 Transformes BC2 BC2 480P120 HAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 YES NO YES NO Ix 2 04 Transforers EBA 4BA01120 VAG TRANSFORMER Y23 YES YES I x 2 04 -Transfoamem EBA5 EBA5 4801120 VAC TRANSFORMER B24 YES NO YES NO I B 5 5 N N 2 04 Transformers EBB12 EBB12 4801120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 21 YES NO YES NO I 5 N x 5 N 2 04 -Transformer NONE EBB2 48AV/208.12SV TRANSFORMERB2 YES NO YES YES I x N N x 2 04 .Transfoenes sST5 STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A YES NO YES YES I 9 xN*2 05 Hrizontal Pumps 21SIP-PMP 0021SIP SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 YES NO YES YES I B 2 05

• Honzoetal Pumps 22AFP-PMP 0022AFP AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 YES NO YES NO I x 2 05 Hozonetal Pumps 22CCP-PMP 0022CCP CCW PUMP NO. 22 YES NO YES YES I x 2 05 -Honzontal Pumps 22CHP-PMP 0022CHP NO. 22 CHARGING PUMP YES NO YES NO I B a 2 55 -Horzonal Pumps 21CSP 21CSP CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 YES NO YES NO I B 5 N 2 SE -Hurlontal Pumps 22CSP 22CSP CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 22 YES NO YES NO I A a x 0 2 05 Horzontal Pumps 22CHPFCA 0022CHPFCA CHARGING PUMP NO. 22 FLUID DRIVE COOLER A YES NO YES NO I A 2 05 -Honzontal Pumps 22CHPFCB 0022CHPFCB CHARGING PUMP NO. 22 CRANKCASE OIL YES NO TEA NO I 0 COOLER 2 05

• Honzoal Pumps 22IACCLWP G022CLWP 22 VA CMPR CL COOLING WATER PMP YES NO YES YES I a a a 2 5 -HoeZOl-al Pumps 22PVVMP 0022PWMP PRIM WATER MAKE-UP PUMP 22 YES NO YES NO I x 2 05 -Horizontal Pumps 22SIP-PMP 002251P SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 22 YES NO YES YES I ABC 2 05 -Horizontal Pumps 23AFP-PMP 0023AFP AUX FEED PUMP NO. 23 YES NO YES NO I 2 05 -Horizontal Pumps 23CCP-PMP 0023CCP CCW PUMP NO. 23 YES NO YES YES I 2 05

• Hodzwolal Pumps 23CHP-PMP O023CHP NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP YES NO YES NO I A B 2 05 -Hotzonfal Pumps 23CHPFCA 0023CHPFCA 23 CHARG PMP FLUID DRV COOLER YES NO YES NO I B N 2 05 -Horizoetal Pomps 23CHPFCB 0023CHPFCB 23 CHARG PMP FLUID DRV COOLER YES NO YES NO I 0 a 2 05 -HoHzotal Pumps 23SIP-PMP 0023SIP SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 23 YES NO YES YES I B x 2 05 -Horzontal Pumps 21AFP-PMP 21AFP AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 YES NO YES NO I 2 05 -Horzontal Pumps 21BATP 21BATP BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 YES NO YES NO I B s 2 05 -Honzontal Pumps 21CCP-PMP 21CCP CCW PUMA NO. 21 YES NO YES YES I 2 05 -Honzootal Pumps 21CHP-PMP 21CHP NO. 21 CHARGING PUMP YES NO YES NO I B a 0 2 AS -Honzonlal Pumps 21CHPFCA 21CHPFCA 21 CHARGING PUMP FLUID DRIVE COOLER A YES NO TES NO I x A 2 ;1 Homes.rl Pumps 21CHPFCA 21CHPFCB 21 CHARGING PUMP CRANKCASE OIL COOLER YES NO SEA NO I 5 2 05 -Horizontal Pumps 211ACCLWP 21CLWP 21 I/A CMPR CL COOLING WATER PMP YES NO YES YES I a S

• Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-3 of 42 EQIJJ~iE CREE SCREEN 2 SC1 N S*CREEN4 Fl" Sfstly Fu-ct1on..U JTS "S E -... ..ii ...:. ..-. _.,_..__,:CAS:.;:.E.

.. -EcPENT(,-.

EFRPEIt.-

-.:~EC~PlN ... " '":i : "t *En "not.. ., .... ,.,o HS,. R"nty , o teto4 ut -... 2t2V3.u~ ___ Ryoted IEE~ /!5 Id~l en8 I Buntd Contro Cnto ControlWCnanyn 2 05 .Hozontal Pumps 21PWMP 211PW MP PRIM STR MAKE-UP PUMP 21 YES NO YES NO I x 2 05 -Honzo/tal Pumps 22BATP 22SATP BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 22 YES NO YES NO I B I 2 06 -Verical Pumps 21SWP-PMP 0021SWP 21 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 x 2 06 -VPc/cal Pumps 22FOTP 0022FOTP FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D G 22 YES NO YES YES 0 2 T -Vrsmul Pumps 22RHRP-PMP S022RHRP RIR PUMP NO. 22 YES NO YES NO I a *2 0P -Vs/Seal Pumps 21RP 21RCPMP 21 RECIRC PUMP YES NO YES NO I I x X 2 06 -Vert/cal Pumps 22RP 22RCPMP 22 RECIRC PUMP YES NO YES NO I T x u x 2 06 -Vertscal Pumps 22SWP 0022SWP 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 06 -VPdmcal Pumps 23FOTP 0023FOTP FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 YES NO YES NO 0 H x C 2 06 PVrical Pumps 23SWP-PMP 0023SWP 23 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 06 Veti/al Pumps 24SWP-PMP 0024SWP 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 V -Vutical Pumps 25SWP-PMP 0025SWP 25 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 06 -Vertisu Pumps 26SWP-PMP 0026SWP 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 06 -Vericul Pumps 21FOTP 21FOTP FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D G.21 YES NO YES NO 0 I

• 5 2 06 Vedi/al Pumps 21RHRP 21RHRP RHR PUMP NO. 21 YES NO YES YES I S x 2 07

• Fluid-Operated Valss 200A 0200A 21 LETDOWN ORIFICE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Operuted Vals. 2008 0200B 22 LETDOWN ORIFICE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valws 200C 020OC 23 LETDOWN ORIFICE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Operuled Val/s 2TWA 0204A ALT CHG FLOW NO 2 HOT LEG CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B u 2 07 -FluidOperated Valves 204B 02G4B CHG FLOW NO I COLD LEG CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH B S 2 07 Fluid-Opeated Valses 201 20t LETDN LINE ISO VALVE NO YES NO I T/M B 2 07 -Fluid-Opera/d Va.so- 202 202 LETDN LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valws 203 203 ALT CHG FLOW NO 2 HOT LEG CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 07 .Fl~ud-Operu/ed Vu.1s 212 212 AUX SPRAY CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Opera/ed Va/ws 213 213 EXCESS LETDOWN CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES I P/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Opera/md Valeso 215 215 EXC LETUN LINE 3WAY CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 07 Fluid-Opera/ed Valess 310 310 LETDOWN TO VCT DEMINERALIZERS YES NO YES NO I B 2 07 Fluid-Opera/ed Valss 549 549 PRESS RELIEF GAS ANALYZER CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 07 Fluid-Operted Val/es A52 552 PRIMARY WATER MAKE-UP TO PRT VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 V7 -Fluid-Operated Val/so 791 791 CCW TO EXC L/QN HX-21 ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 07 -Flurd-Operated Va/sos 793 793 CCW RETURN FR EXC L/D ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 07 Fluid-Operated Val-es 796 796 CCW RETURN FR EXC UDN HX-21 ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valsor 798 798 CCW TO EXC LION HX-21 ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I x 2 07 -Fluid-Opera/td Valvus EA-1 EA-1 IA TO CB PA VENT YES NO YES NO I x x x 2 07 Fm7id-Opeted Vale FCV-110A FCV-1/DA BORIC ACID BLENDER AC/C INPUT FLOW VALVE YES NO YES NO I B x Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-4 of 42 SCREEN Five Safety SCREEN 2, SCREEN S SCREEN4 Fie4yFm~n.SEMOU C-_SS_ -EO. .EE .-. ... -... e mnee....t o,

....- ;:tr- -.... ._..;*.Ef...S4T .: E. .Tv. DESCRIPTION

!,? *. " ...!:=:.o;l ..... -.Reesyy Peue Ivetr J .Ne*t. Coit ... 'Mo 2 7-Fud-ertdVve FV- B V-0B BORIC ACID BLENDER OUT TO ClHG PMP YES NO YES NO I S SUCTION CTRL VALVE 2 07 -Fluid.OperatvUVvlves FCV-111A FCV-111A PRIMARY WAT ER MAKEUP VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 07 -Fluid-OperatedsValVes FCV-1118 FCV-1118 SLENDER FLOW TO VCT CTSL VALVE YES NO YES NO I B0 2 07 -Fluid-Oporoted Valves FCV-1121 FCV-1121 EIAFP RECIRC LINE CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Opearved Salvos FCV-1123-VLV FCV.1123 23AFP RECIRC LINE CTRL SALVE YES NO YES NO Ix 2 07 -FIuiU.Operaled Valves FCV-1iTK FCV-li7E JIACKESTWATER COOLER RE1 FLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I 0 0 0 x 0 2 57 -Fluid.Operated Valvs FCV-117KA FCV-li76A JACEET WATER COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I 0 0 0 0 2 57 -Fluid-Oparalod Salvos FCV-.tS5A-VLV FCV-455A AUS FEED TO02200G FLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO FEB YES I 2 07 -FluidSporled ValVes FCV-455S-VLV FCV-UD5B ASS FEED TO 21 5G FLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES Ix 2 57 -Fluid.Oporaivd Valves FCV-405C-VLV FCV-A05C Ado FEED TO 2300G FLOW CTNRL VALVE VET NO YES YES I 2 ST -Fluid.Oporalod Valves F CV-4550-VLV FCV.ASVD ASS FEEDOT0O24 SO FLOW CT RL VALVE YES NO YES YES Ix 2 57 -Fluid-Oporaled Valves FCV-4SKA-VLV FCV-USEA AFW CONTROL VALVE TO NO 21 50 YES NO YES YES Ix 07 -Fluid-Operated Salves FCV.40SK-VLV FCV-04SK AFW CONTROL VALVE TO NO 2200G YES NO YES YES *2 ST -Flvid-Oparalnd SalVeS FCS-400C-VLV FCV-4SKC AFW CONTROL VALVE TO NO02300G YES NO YES YES I 2 07 -Flvid-Operalod Salves FCV-ASKO-VLV FCV-4TED A7W CONTROL VALVE TO NO 24 50 YES NO YES YES I*2 ST -Flvid-Oporaed Valves HCV-1l18 HICV-1118 22 AFWP PUMvP SPEED CONTROL VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 07 -Flvid-Oparatad Valves HCV,-123 HCV-i23 EXCESS LETDOWN HS OUTFLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I T1H S 2 0-Fli-prtdVls HV12 HV12 CHARGING FLOW TO REGEN KS FLOW CTRL YES NO YES NO I BS 2 07. FuidO~vrald Vaves RCV142 HCV1U2 VALVE 2 57 -Flvid-Opaerotd Valves IA-1 IA-i 221A COMPRESSOR 010CR PIPING RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I a

• 0 5 2 ST F lvid-Oparaled SolVes IA-Il1 IA-i- I 2711 COMPRESSOR 010CR PIPING RELIEF SALVE YES NO YES YES I 0 a a o 2 07 -Flvid-Operat ed Valves lA-S7t 100E1 I=NSTRUMENT AIR RECEIVER RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I a a a-07 -Fluid-Oparated SalVes LC-125TS LCi2575 LEVEL CONTROLLER YES NO YES NO I a n 0 0 2 ST -Fluid-Spearvid Valves LC-1208S LC-1208S LFVEL CONTROLLER YES NO YES NO I 0 0 0 0 2 57 -Fluid-Operatod Valves LC-12095 LC-1259S LEVEL CONTROLLER YES NO YES NO I 0 0 0 0 2 57. -TIlad-Operaled Valves LCV-ii2R LCV-112B RWST TO CHARGING POMP SUCTION VALVE YES NO YES YES I B 0 2 07 -laid~aralodValve LCS.IS8 LC~liAK CONDENSAT E STORAGE TANK LEVEL CONTROL YENOES OI 2 7 Fud-peatdVave CV LV- 18 VALVE _ES NYES O __2 07 -Fluid.Oporated Salves LCV-45R LCV-45R LETDOWN CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I 8 2 57 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS5-1-21 MS-l-21 2100G MOW YES NO YES NOI T 2 57 -Fluidt-Operaiod Valves MS-I-22 MS-i-22 22 S0 MSOW YES NO YES NO I T 2 07 -Fluid.Oporalod Valves MS-i-23 MS5-1-23 230 MO MW YES NO YES NO I T*-07 -Fluid.Oporaed 740-1-24 MS.-1-24 24 0G0MS0W YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 -Flaid-Opevrated MS-45A MS-45A STEAM DEN 21 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 2 07 -Flaid-Oparated Valvs MS-ISO MS-d5B STEAM 000 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 2 57 -Fluid-Opesaled Valves MS-45C MS-45C STEAM SEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-5 of 42 SCREEN 1 SCR E EN')3 SCFEEEII Fin Safel Fanslans UI SEEL EQUIPVLS 'CJEN21T I WTE -ý SELP ?EOUI -MMnSs -: .*, NihRd. rss neli-ns ..R....RIIIE:

• ..... ..EnfiaeFai Cathnl~ Repacd EE. --TigI ontd onannCnn Cnt 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS45C MS-A5E STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I T A 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valves MSAD6A MSfEAD STEAM GEN 21 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valves MS-6T MS-A6E STEAM GEN 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 2 S7 -Fluid-Opraled Valves MS-T6C MSaE6C STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS-A6T MS-T6D STEAM GEN 24 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valves MSS47A MSAT7A STEAM GEN 21 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operaltd Valves MS-47B MS-7B STEAM GEN 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T S 2 07 -Fluid-Ope.aled Valves MS-A7C MS-47C STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valves MS47EC MS-A7R STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T S 2 07 -Fluid-Operatad Valves MS-48A MS-IRA STEAM GEN 21 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 -Fliad-Operaled Valves MS-I8B MS-48B STEAM GEN 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 2 07 -Flid-Operated Valves MS-8C MS-IC STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valves MS-ID MS-48D STEAM GEN 24 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valves MS-49A MS-R9A STEAM GEN 21 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operaed Vlves Ms 3B MSO9B STEAM GEN 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 5 2 07 -Fluad-Operaled Valves MsC MST9C STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -FIlud-Operatd Valve MS-49D MS419D STEAM GEN 24 SAFET Y RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T*2 07 -Fluid-Operaed Valves PCV-1134 PCV-1134 ATMSTM REL VALVE 23 S. YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-)perated Valv-g PCV-1135-VLV PCV. 135 ATM STM REL VALVE 22 SG YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Flid-Operaled Valves PCV-1136-VLV PCV-1136 ATM STM REL VALVE 23 SG YES NO YES NO I T A 2 07 -Fluid-Opemaled Val-e PCV-1 137-VLV PCV-1137 ATM STM REL VALVE 24 SG YES NO YES NO I T A x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-i 139 PCV- 1139 AUX FWPTURSSMSUP FRESSREDUCING YES NO YES YES I x VALVE 2 07 -Fluid-Operaatd Valves PCV-1213-VLV PCV-1213 CRTL VALVE TO REGULATE PRESSURE ON t22 VES NO YES YES I ABFWP BEARING COOLING WATER 2 07 -Fluid-Operatd Valves PCV-1214-VLV PCV-1214 S.G. BLOWDOWN ISO VALVE 21 SG YES NO YES NO I T 2 07 -Fluad-Opeated Valves PCV-1215-VLV PCV-1215 S.G. BLOWDOWN ISO VALVE 22 SG YES NO YES NO I T x 2 ST -Flaid-Operaled Valves PCV-1216-VLV PCV-1216 SO. SLOWDOWN ISO VALVE 23 SG YES NO YES NO I T A 2 S7 -Fluid-Operaled Valves PCV-1217-VLV PCV-1217 S.G. SLOWDOWN ISO VALVE 24 So YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1228-VLV PCV-1228 EA SUPPLY CONT BLDG INSTR AIR HEADER YES NO YES NO I x x a 2 07 -Fluid-Operted Valves PCV-1276 PCV-1276 N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES YES NO YES NO I x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-131DA PCV-1310A ASX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY YES NO YES NO I SHUT-OFF VALVE 2 07 -Flaid-Operated Values PCV-1310B PCV-1310B AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY YES NO YES NO I SHUT.OFF VALVE 2 07 -Fluad-OpertedValves PCV-135 PCV-135 NON-REGEN HX OUT FLOW YES NO YES NO I B 2 07 -Fluid-Operaed Valves PCV-AS PCV.455C PRESSURIZER PORV YES NO YES YES I Tla 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valves PCV-I56 PCV.456 PRESSURIZER PORV YES NO YES YES I TIE Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-6 of 42.S.EN. S ..SCE, ByFuton SCENS CRE 2 'REqN.loerot 4Coeer WIN, WEN,' Eý&_E:`E ESýCIFIDN4Undargo A I, ..... .....(Ir 2 07 -Fleid-Operaed Valves PCV-464 PCV-464 PRESSURIZER SAFETY BELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I TIH 2 57 -Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-466 PCV-dE6 PRESSURIZER SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/H 2 D7 -Fluid-Operated Valves PCV464 PCV-464 PRESSURIZER SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/H 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves PRV 3100 PRV-3100 N2 TO PORV 455C REG VALVE YES NO YES NO I TI/H 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valves PRV 3101 PRV-3101 N2 TO PORV456 REG VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H 2 07- Fluid-Operated Valves TCV-1103 TCV-1103 SW RET FROM CFCU TEMP CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves TCV 1104 TCV-I104 FAN COOLING UNITS RTN BYPASS VALVE YES NO YES YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves TCV 1105 TCV-1105 FAN COOLING UNITS RTN BYPASS VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 07 -Fluvd-Operated Valves TCV-1113 TCV- 1113 INST AIR CC HX SW OUTLET TCV YES NO YES NO I a 2 08A -Motor-Operaled Valves 250A-VLV 0250A 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 8 x 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 250B-VLV 0205B 22 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B x 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 250C-VLV 0250C 23 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B 2 CIA -Motor-Operated Valves 250D-VLV 0250D 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B x 2 OCA -Motor-Operated Valves 745A 07S5A RHR HX 22 INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B 2 CBA -Motor-Operated Valves 745B 0745B RHR HX 22 INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B *2 OBA -Motor-Operated Valves 822A-VLV 0822A RHR HX 221SO VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH B 2 C8A -Motor-Operated Valves 822B-VLV 0822B RHR HX 21 ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves B88A 0888A RHR HX 21 TO SI PUMPS SUCTION VALVE YES NO YES NO I B x 2 0CA. Meter-Operated Valves 888B 0888B RHR HX 21 TO SI PUMPS SUCTION VALVE YES NO YES NO I B 0 2 ORA -Metor-Operated Valves 88A-VLV 0889A CTMT SPRAY HEADER ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 O8A -Motor-Operated Valves 889B-VLV 0889B CTMT SPRAY HEADER ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 ORA- Motor-Operated Valves 8B4A-VLV O094A NO. 21 ACCUM DISCHAROE VALVE YES NO YES NO I TSH B 2 08A -Metor-Operated Valves 894B-VLV 0894B NO. 22 ACCUM DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B x 2 OBA -Motor-Operated Valves 894C-VLV OBA4C NO. 23 ACCUM DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B x 2 OA -Moeor-Operated Valves 894D-VLV OB9D NO. 24 ACCUM DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B x 2 O0A -Motor-Operated Valves 1802A lOO2A SIS RECIRC PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B x x 2 SOA -Meter-Operated Valves 180020 102B SIS RECIRC PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B x x 2 08A -Moter-Operated Valves 1810 VLV 1810-VLV MOV OWST TO SIS PMP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH B 2 08A -Meter-Operated Valves 1870 1870 RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH B x 2 CRA -Metor-Operated Valves 205-VLV 205-VLV CHARGING FLOW TO RCS ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 0x ORA -Meter-Operated Valves 222-VLV 222 VLV RCP SEAL WATER RETURN ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I TOH B 2 CRA -Motor Operated Valves 226 226 CHARGING FLOW TO RCS CTMT ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 333-VLV 333 BORIC ACID FEED TO CHG PUMPS VALVE YES NO YES NO I B 2 OSA -Moter-Operated Valves 4925 4925 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B 2 O8A -Moter-Operated Valves 4926 4926 22 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-7 of 42 IISCREEN WSd I_PM Eoto INoetrdM 2 SEA Motor-Oper atd Valves 492 4927 23 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B x SE9A -MotGo-rae Vve 428 4928 24 ROP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YEN NO I E a(ERA Mo Op ed 153 GROSS FAILED FUEL DETECTOR SAMPLE LINE YES NO YES NO I B ISO VALVE 2 SA- Motor-Operated Valves 535 535 PORV BLK VALVE 455C YES NO YES YES I T/H x 2 E8A- Motor-Operaled Valves 536 536 PORV BLK VALVE 456 YES NO YES YES t TVH-2 SPA- Motor-Operated Valves 730 730 RHR SUCT LN ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH B x 2 S8A -Motor-Operated Valves 731-VLV 731 R5R SUCT LN ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH B x 2 SEA -Motr-Operated Valves 743-VLV 743 RRR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE YES NO YES NO I B x s 2 0SA -Motor-Operated Valves 744 74" RHR PUMP DISCHARGE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 9 x a a 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 746-VLV 746 #22 RRHX OUTLET ISO STOP VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B x x 2 SEA -Motor-Operated Valves 747-VLV 747 #21 RRHX OUTLET ISO STOP VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH B x x 2 08A -Meter-Operated Valves 769-VLV 769 CCW SUPP-RCP ISO YES NO YES NO I x 2 0NA -Motor-Operated Valves 784-VLV 784 CCW RET FR RCP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I x 2 0SA -Motor-Operated Valves 786 N86 CCW RET FR RCP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 08A -Meotr-Operated Valves 789 789 CCW RET FR RCP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 SEA -Motor-Operated Valves 797-V-V 797 CCW SUPP-RCP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I x 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 882 882 RWST TO RHR PUMP SUCTION VALVE YES NO YES NO I B a 2 0SA -Motor-Operated Valves 885E 885E CONTAINMENT SUMP TO RHR SUCTION VALVE YES NO YES NO I B x x 2 0SA -Motor-Operated Valves FCV-625-VLV FCV-6A5 CCW REE FR RCPs WSO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves HCV-E38 HCV-638 as1 RHR HX OUTLET CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I E B a 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves HCV.A0 HCV-640 #22 RHR HX OUTLET CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I N x 2 0SA -Motor-Operated Valves LCV-112C LCV-112C VCT OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B x 2 USA -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-r1-1A-SWN-OT-tA FCU-21 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H VLV _2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-4-rIB-SWN-NI- IN FCU-21 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H x VLV 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves VLItV41 SE SWN-Er-A FCU-22 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H 2 SEA -Motor-Operated Valves EWN-M-2N-SWN-4t-2B FCU-22W SW LET ISO VALVE YES NO YEN YES I H*VLV 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-rI-3A FCU-23 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x VLV 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-41-3B-SWN41-3B FCU-23 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H VLV S TEA -Motor-Operated Valves EWE-4l-NA-SWNI-A FCU-24 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 8 VLV-0SA- A-tor-Operated Valves SWN-r-41a-SWNA-4-4 FCU-24 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H x VLV 08A -Motor-Operated Valves SVVWN--SA-SWN-41-5A FCU-25 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YEN NO I VLV S OSA -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-4t-5E-SWN-41-5B FCLJ-25 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YEN YES I_ VLV Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-8 of 42..v. ... .,- ........ S R N S N SCREENS ..Fin. ,. Functions a~SS~l~E~jjPC

~ IPM S& I t EALJ AJI E-M¶T SCRIP.-TJ0N ea~E~rl.?S S MSWN-1A WN A FcU-21 SERVICE WATER OUTLET ISOLATION 2 08A -Mtr-Operated Valves SWNV-I SWN-1 VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x SPA MWN. -SWNd-PB FCU-21 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YN I E 2 08A -Motor-O perated Valves VLN V d 2 SW N 4H2A FCU-22 SW O UTLET ISO VALVE Y VLVYE NO YS O SW N-HA-2A-2 SA -Met vr-Operated Valves VLV SWN -H-2A FCU-22 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x VLV YS N E E SWN.44-AS-PA- Meer-Operated Valves VL SWN-A4-32 FCU-23 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H a 2 08A -Meter-Operated Valves SWNV-A-HA SWNp-d-A FCU-23 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H VLV SW 2 08A. Motor-Operated Valves VLV SWN-PA-HB FCU-24 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I x 2 0SA -Moter-Operated Valves SWN-44-A-SWN4-4UA FCU-24 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H VLV 2 08A -M etre-Operated Valves VLV SWN FCU-2 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES Nx 2 0PA -Mer-Operated Valves NL A SWN--A 2CU OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H SWN-44.STA 2 0SA -Motor-Operated Valves VWV --UWN 4-SB F- U-25 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H UWN-Ut-IA-2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves VLV SWN-51-IA 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H SW N- 5I-2A-2 0PA- Mer-Operated Valves VLV SWN-St-2A 22 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H SWN-51-3A-2 SPA- M etot-Operaled Valves SLY SWN-TI-3A FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H SW N- T14 A-II 2 PA -Meter-Operated Valves VLV SWN-51-IA 24 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NOI H 2 SPA -Meter-Opetated Valves SWN-51-5A-a VLV SWN- 25-2A FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H SP08A -Meter-Opered Salves SWN-1T-2A-VLV SWN-71-1A FCU-21 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NOH P08A. M etor-Operated Valves SWNL 71 TA SWN-T1-TB FCU-21 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES O I H*SLV YS N E E 2 08 -Mtor-perad Vaves SWN-71-2A-2 SPA -Meter-Operated Valves VV SWN-Ti-2A FCU-22 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H 2 08A -Metor-Operated Valves SWN-71-2B-SWN-71-2B FCU-22 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x VLV UWN-T1-VA-2 08A -Metor-Operated Valves VLV SWN-71-3A FCU-23 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H SWN-T1-3B-2 0PA.- Meer-Operated Salves VLV SWN-T1-3 FCU-23 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H 2 0 TA -Motor-Opera ted Valves SW N-71-4A- SWN-71-4A FCU-2P MOTOR MS0 A N PE YES NO YES NOH VLVYE NO YS NH 2 10PA e Mlotore-Operated Valves SWN-714BA SWN71-4B FCU-24 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I Haa VLV 2 08A -Meterd-Operaed Valves LCSWN.7l.SSTA-LC-SA I L 2 0TAP-Setod-Operated Valves LV S-72SA FCU-25 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I a x 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-71-SB-SWN-71-5B FCU-25 MOTOR ISO VALVE IE HO YExOI I VLVYE NO YS NH 2 0BB -Solenoid-Operated Valves 519 519 PRIMARY WATER MAKE-UP TO PRT VALVE YExOYS N 2 08B -Solenid-Op-erat Valves LC-27 LC-27 LEECOTLVAEYS NOES O 2 08B -Solenoid-Operaled Valves LCV-12078 LCV-1207B FUEL OIL DAY TANK LEVEL 21 YES NO YES YES I a o a 2 08B -Soleveid-Operated Valves LCV. 1208A LCV-1208A LEVEL CONTROL VALVE YES NO YES YES I 0 2 UPS- Solenoid-Operated Valves LCV- 1208B LCV- 1208B FUEL OIL DAY TANK LEVEL 22 YES NO YES YES I 2 OSl- Sele oid-Opertd Valves ICV-12.A LEV/EL CONTROL VAILVE YE O YES **2 08BE-oloi.eredVls LCV- 1209B LCV- 1209B FUEL OIL DAY TANK LEVEL 23 " E O YES YEI* x**

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-9 of 42 SC E W CUR Y EN 1 S .u.:'! : + .....:,*-"..:.1

Zl": 5." i. ...-".j .* iY$3 .,-itstantv i ......,J54oJ

..... eaar Iwnir. ~eev C...ne 2 088 Solenoid-Operated Valve s SOV-I230 SOV-1235 SG021 MSIV SOY YES NO YES NO I Tl 2 088-Sloenvid.Operated Valves SOV-1231 SOY 1231 SGO21 MSIV SOY YES NO YES NO I T 2 aSS Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1232 SOV-1232 SG021 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I 5 2 OSS- Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1233 SOV-1233 50 21 MSIV SOY YES NO YES NO I T 2 585 Solenoid-Opeealed Valves SOV-1238 SOV-1234 SG022 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T 2 O555 Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1235 SOV-1235 SG02 MSIY SOV YES NO YES NO I r 2 O8BE Soleevid-Operated Valves SOV- 1238 SOV-1236 SO022 MSIV SOY YES NO YES NO I TV 2 ORB -Solenoid-Operaled Valves SOY. 1237 SOV-1237 50 22 MSIV SOY YES NO YES NO I S 2 058B- Solenoid-Opeeatedl Valves SOV-123R SOV-122R SG023 MSIM SOY YES NO YES NO I r*2 088 -Solenoid-Opaeraed Valves SOV- 1235 SOV-123R SG023 MENV SOY YES NO YES NO I T*5 88 -Svlenvid-Opeeated Valves SOV-1245 SOV-1240 SG023 MDIV SOY YES NO YES NO I T a 2 SRSB- Solenoid3-Oper-alsd3Valoes SOV-12s.1 SOV.12A,1 SO 23 MSIVSOV YES NO YES NO I TV 2 08B8- Svleeoid-Operated Valves SOV- 1242 SOV- 1242 SG024 MSIV SOY YES NO YES NO I V 2 E8BB- Seleseid-Oparated Valves SUV- 1243 SOV-1243 SG024 MSIV SOY YES NO YES NO I T*2 058B Svlenoid-Opeeated Valves SOV-1244 SOV-1244 SG024 MS/V SOY YES NO YES NO I T a 2 555.- Selenold-Opevaled Valves SOV-1245 SOV-1245 SGO24 MSIV SOY YES NO YES NO I T*2 D8B -Soleneld-Operaled Vetoes SOY- 125R SOV-1258 CST LEVEL CONTROL SOY YES NO YES NO I x 2 08B5- Soieeoid.Operated Valves SOV-127A SOV-1276 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES Ix 2 58B5- Soleeoid-Opertled Valves SOV- 1276A SOV-1276A SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YESI 2 08B-Soleeoid-Operaled Valves SOV-1315 SOV-1310 AUX FWP TURS STEAM SUPP SOY YES NO YES NO *2 O8BE-Soienoid-Operaled Valves SOV.-1311 SOY-1311 ADS EWEP OURS STEAM SUPP SOY YES NO YES NO I 2 088-* Solenoid-Operated Valves OOV-250A SOV-200A 200A INSTRUMENS AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/V I 2 ORB.- Soleevid-Opereted Valves SOV-200B SOV-200B 2008 INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES NO I VIA 2 URS- Soieeoid.Operoled Valves SOV-20OC SOV-250C 2OOC INST1REMENE AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID YES NO YES YES I S/H 2 ORB -Soleeoid-Operated Valves SOV-2Ol SOY-251 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/HC 2 O885- Solenoid.Operaled Valves SOV-252 SOY-202 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I TVH *2 0SR -Solenoid-Opecaled Valves SOV-204A SOV-2V4A SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/I- a*2 088 -Soleneid-Operaled Valves SOV-254B SOV-2S4B SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I SIC a 2 088 -Solenhoid-Operaled Valves SOY-212 SOV-212 SOLENOID VALVE. PRESSURIZER AUS SPRAY YES NOYS O 0A LINE IN K 2 088 -Solenoid-Operated Valves V OV-213 SOV-212 SOLENOID VALVE. INITIATES EXCESS LETDOWN YES N E E /FLOW N E E /2 ORB -Solenoid-Operaled Valves SOV-459 SOY-ASS SOLENOID VALVE. BLOCK LETDOWN FROM RCS YES NO YES N I ON LOW PRESSURIZER LEVEL N /2 08B- Solenoid-operated Valves SOV-23t SOV-7230 SGP Y SLETDOW CLE CLN YES NO YES NO I TI 2 08 -.I.id pertedVales OV-233 SOV123 SG21SOAION SOLEOI VALV NO 791NOI 2 088 -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOY-1234 SOY-1234 CGYC2 ESCSVS LYO WNCV NTUN I YES NO YES NO I T/EXCESS LETDOWN Ce COOLING WATERYE NO ES OI /2 088 -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-7A6 SOV-IR6 ISOLATION SOLENOID YES NO YES NO I T Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-10 of 42* -., ';;r ,4REEN2- CREN 1 3SCREEN 4 -FiveSafaty*Funstlansi " -'EC- LI .I -...... ... .... ..E ,-):. , .. .s ... :i t .... 8c E,, P ,.ssau, .. ..'SE EQIIPqAS : "" "" XES EDW HECNIE;WTR' ID -Sd C.2 08B5- Salennid-Operalad Valves SOT-TSR SOV-798 EXCESS LETDOWN Ha COOLING WATER YS N E OI 11 ISOLATION SOLENOID VALVE NO 798 YES NO YES NO I TI, 2 09 -Fans "FAN22SUP CCR SUPERVISORY PANELS VENT FAN 22. MZ YES NO YES YES I 2 09 -Fans 22CRF-BLWR 0022CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 22 YES NO YES NO I T/H x 2 09 -Fans 23CRF-BLWR 0023CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 23 YES NO YES NO I T/H 2 09 .Fans 24CRF-BLWR 0024CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 24 YES NO YES NO I ! mRI 2 0 -Fans 2SCRF-RLWR S025CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 25 YES NO YES NO I TIH 2 55 -Fans 21CRF-BLWR 21CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 21 YES NO YES NO I T-Hx CCRAC1 CCRACI 2 11 -Chillers CCR CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS) YES NO YES NO I x 5

• 5 CCRAC2 CCRAC2 2 1I -Chillers CCR CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS) YES NO YES NO I x x x 5 2 12 -Air Compressors 221AC 0022ANC INST AIR COMP 22 YES NO YES NO I x 5 K x 2 12 -Air Compressors 221ACJC 00221ACJC INST AIR COMP 22 JACKET COOLER YES NO YES NO I

• 5 x 2 12 -Air Compresso 21EDAC- 21EDAC STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 21 YES NO YES NO I Nx x55*COMP 2 12 -Air Tompressors 21AC 21IAC INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR21 YES NO YES NO I *

• x 2 12 -Ail Cmprassrs 211ACJC 21LACJC INST AIR COMP 21 JACKET COOLER YES NO YES NO I x N 2 12 -Air Compsessars 22EDO -22EDAC STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 22 YES NO YES NO I x x *2 12 -Air Co.psessonrs 23EDAC- 23EDAC STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR 023 YES NO YES NO I 5x x COMP 21MGS 2 13 -marns Geneatsaas 21 MG Set 21 MACHINE GENERATOR SET YES NO YES NO I X 21MGS 2 13 -moles Generators 22 MG Sel 22 MACHINE GENERATOR SET YES NO YES NO I X 14 -DstEAbu/ion Panels DPNL21 DC DIST:PNL 21 125 VDC DISTRIBUTION PNL 21 PC3 YES NO YES NO I 5 x x x 2 14

• DisIlAbun Panels DPNL21AA DC OIST:PNL 125V DC DISTRIBUTION AREA. EPFF YES NO YES NO I a N x 21AA 2 14 -Dstsibtuion Panels DPNL22 DC OISTPNL 22 125 VDC DISTRIBUTION PNL 22 PT4 YES NO YES NO I x x x 2 14 -Disebution Panels DPNL23AA DC DIST:PNL 125 VOC DISTRIBUTION PNL 23AA EPF3 YES NO YES NO I x N 5 23AA 2 14 -Distibution Panels PPNL21 DC PWR.PNL 21 125 VOC POWER PANEL N21 PC1 YES NO YES NO I x N 5 2 14 -Disltribuon Panels PPNL22 DC PWR;PNL 22 125 VDC POWER PANEL #22 PC2 YES NO YES NO I x N 5 5 2 14 -,sIsbuaio Panels PPNL23 DC PWR;PNL 23 125 VDC POWER PANEL #23 EPB3 YES NO YES NO I N 5

• x 2 14 -Distributon Panels PPNL24 DC PWR:PNL 24 125 VDC POWER PANEL #24 EPA9 YES NO YES NO Ix x x 2 14 -Distdbalion Panels EOBI EDOs STATIC INV. #24 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH YES NO YES NO I x x

• x 2 14 -Distibution Panels EDB2 EOB2 8OTA BATTERY #24 CIRCUIT BREAKER YES NO YES NO I a x s a 2 14 -Dislnbalion Panels EDBN EDBT STATIC INV #21 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH YES NO YES NO I *x

• 5 2 14 -Distribuion Panels EDBA EDB6 STATIC INV. 422 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH YES NO YES NO I x x *2 14 -DOstsibaan Panels EDOS EOB8 N00A BATTERY #23 CIRCUIT BREAKER YES NO TEN NO I x x N 2 14 -DlstiHbtimn Panels EDCI EDCI STATIC INV. 523 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH YES NO YES YES I 5 a x 2 14 -Oishrbutn Panels EDO-i ED51 TRANSFER SWITCH YES NO YES NO I 5 a a Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-11 of 42 S SC-REENI2:".,, SCR EEN-. ..S SCREEN#. Fiv "eqyF aesdN..sURAET 5 S8SEL,-SSEL.QUIR..LASSF EOV. EM _4 EQLEPjUE.NT

.JP..e... * .*' Cale: a; UI. F N", :'gQUh" FCk,..;"" " '" ". " " lonn? " .-"-- iiy Pnwu ": -'."t' :,. Heali" C n, ln__ raje42~m?-;Rap.

d PEJESE., -Weskl,? 0: S.a1.1-t j~p~jQ~~ Yaect~Tassss.

TNIIP cReauld Cnne~l. Celfel' Cdn~r (T 1 H) I 2 14 ODisribution Panels ETD-2 EDD2 TRANSFER SWITCH YES NO YES NO I x x x 2 14 Distribution Panels ED-3 EDD3 TRANSFER SWITCH YES NO YES NO I a x 5 a a 2 14 Distribulion Panels EDDA4 EDD4 TRANSPER SWITCH YES NO YES NO I ex x 2 14 Distbution Panels IBUS23A EPE3 118 VAC INSTRUMENT BUS #23A YES NO YES NO I a a a a x 2 14 -Distribution Panels EPF6 120 VAC DISTRIBUTION PANEL .2 YES NO YES NO I a a a a x 2 14 -DistlibUion Panels IBUS24 PE6 118 VAC INSTR BUS 24 YES NO YES YES I x *x x 2 14 -Distnbelon Panels IBUS23 PE7 118 VAC INSTR BUS 23 YES NO YES NO I a a a x 2 14 -Dstnbuson Panels IBUS21 PER 118 VAC INSTR BUS 21 YES NO YES YES I x x x 2 14 -Dislisbutifl Panels IBUS22 PE9 118 VAC INSTR BUS 22 YES NO YES YES I x a a a 2 O4 isrinb~sn Panels PNL P0-2 PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP B23 YES NO YES NO IN 2 14 -ISTRIBUTIO N PANEL PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP 021 YES NO YES NO I 3 2 14 Distribution Panels PNL PD-2 DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2 14 -

Panels PNL P0-3 PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP B22 DISTRIBUTION PANEL YES NO YES NO I 2 15 -Bateries on Racks BATT21 BATT21 BATTERY BANK YES NO YES NO I a a e a x 2 15 -BatIner, on Racks BATT22 BATTZ2 BATTERY BANK YES NO YES YES I S x N N 5 2 15 Batteries on Racks BATT23 BATT23 BATTERY BANK YES NO YES NO I a a a x 2 15 -Batnner. en Racks BATT24 BATT24 BATTERY BANK YES NO YES NO I a C x x 2 16 Battery Chargers & Invertors EGA1 EGA1 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER B21 YES NO YES NO I Nx xaa 2 16 -Battery Chargers & keors EGA2 EGA2 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER 822 YES NO YES NO I ax x a 2 16 -Battery Chargers & Ivertors BATTCHG24 EGA3 BATTERY CHARGER 24 YES NO YES NO I a e 5 a a 2 16 -Banery Chargers S Invertrs EGA4 EGA4 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER 824 YES NO YES NO I x x a a a 2 18 t Belery Chargers & Invertoers BATTCHG23 EGAT BATTERY CHARGER 23 YES NO YES NO I x a a a x 2 16 -Baery Charge. & rsfvedrs EGA EGAS I0 KVA STATIC INVERTER #23 YES NO YES NO I x a a 5 2 16 -Battery C(hargern

& erInnrs BATTCHG21 MI9 BATTERY CHARGER 21 YES NO YES NO I 5 a a x 2 16 -Battery Chargers & Ineers BATTCHG22 MN3 BATTERY CHARGER 22 YES NO YES NO I x a a a 2 17 -Engine-Generators 22EDG-ENG 0022EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 YES NO YES NO I a x x 17 -Engine.Ore.eratos 23EDG-ENG 0023EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 YES NO YES NO I a a x a 2 17 -Engine.Generators 21EDG-ENG 21EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 YES NO YES NO I a N S a a RPA.SC-819 INST RK IT INSTRUMENT RACK 19 YES NO YES NO I x x x x RACK 19 2 18 -Instruments an Racks RK-20 INST RK 20 INSTRUMENT RACK 20 YES NO YES NO I x x x x 2 1 -Instruments on Racks RP2-SC-R-INST RK 21 INSTRUMENT RACK 21 YES NO YES NO I a x a a 2 18 Insinments on Racks INST RK 24 INSTRUMENT RACK 24 YES NO YES NO I ax x 18 -Insilmmrnts on Racks IP2-VC INST RK 4A INSTRUMENT RACK 4A YES NO YES NO I a a x a a 2 1S in- n¢ts on R-acks IP2 -VC68 RACK 4B INST RK 48 INSTRUMENT RACK 48 YES NO YES NO I 5 5 5 *2 18.* Inslnrmnts en Ranks IP2-AFB INST RK 5 INSTRUMENT RACKS YES NO YES NO I a a a a 2 18 n-mens on acks RACK 58 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-12 of 42........ .... ...*L- " ....... SC N 2 SCREEN"S R E .F.l"e.- Pun-ti-o_ : .I E C .... ... ... ....f H 214P~ IS*Intumns 1 RakIS E IPLS- -IU)} 4%RKMEN INSTRUENT RAK C9 IYE uNerO MYEas NO I E xse* x x *IP2-EDGSSE"-Isrmnso aks D6 PLEG D UtLRE OTO AE E C NfigYESo N~ ~~~~Os Hox " xo tholaht Ehtto .ho HSted Conroal Cearol" Control' -2 18 Issbsmets on Racks INST RK S INSTRUMENT RACKS9 YES NO YES NO I e e x 2 18 tss~monts on Racks iP2-EDOE-72.

PNL EDDA EDO AUXILIARIES CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I 5 5 x 1P2-EDGB-72.

RACK 2 18 Instruments on Racks SED *ENGAURSR ENGINE AUXILIARIES STARTER RACK YES NO YES NO I x0 2 18 *Ins'meetsoRacks SOV-1139-1 SOV-113-1 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I R 2 18 Instruments on Racks SOV-1139-2 SOV-1139-2 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I 2 18 Instruments on Racks SOV-1 139-3 SOV-1139-3 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I 2 18 'Instniments on Racks SOV-1139-4 SOV-1139.4 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I x 2 18 'Instrsments on Racks SOV-1139-4 SOV 1139.5 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE411A RCS Loop 21 DELTA T TEMP YES NO YES NO I T/H B x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-11rN1 TE1NIA1 RCS LOOP 21 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I T/H B x 2 19 'Temperere Sensors TE-AiB TEA411B RCS LOOP 21 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIN B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-412A TE-412A RCS LOOP 21 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TVH 8 2 19 Temperature Sensors TE4128 TE-12BD RCS LOOP 21 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I T/H 8 x 2 19 t-TenrarsreSe...sors TE'A13 TE-413 RCS LOOP 21 COLD LEG WIDE RANGE TEMP YES NO YES NO I tA B ELEMENT 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-421A TEA21A RCS LOOP 22 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TIH 8 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE1421B TE-421S RCS LOOP 22 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIH B x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE422A TEA22A RCS LOOP 22 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I T-H B x 2 19 Temperature Sensors TE-22Nr TEE422AN1 RCS LOOP 22 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I T/H B 19 'Temperature Sensors TE4.22B TE'22E RCS LOOP 22 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I T/H 8 2 19 'Temperature Sensors TE423 TEA23 RCS LOOP 22 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 19 Temperature Sensors TE-431A TEA'31A RCS Loop 23 DELTA T TEMP YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE4311VI TE'31N1 RCS LOOP 23 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIH B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-31B TE-431B RCS LOOP 23 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TVH B8 2 I ' Temperature Sensors TE-432A TE-432A RCS LOOP 23 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TIH B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE432B TE-432B RCS LOOP 23 COLT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TIN E3 2 18 ' Temperature Sensors TE-433 TE433 RCS LOOP 23 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIA E 2 18 'Temperature Sensors TE-440-r TEA-0N1 RCS LOOP 24 HOT LEO TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I T/H 8 2 19

• Temperature Sensors TE441A TEDA1AA RCS LOOP 28 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIH B 2 19 'Temperature Sensors TE-IA TE-41S RCS LOOP 24 COLT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIH B 2 19 'Temperature Sensors TE-o-2A TE-442A RCS LOOP 24 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TIH B 2 19 'Temperature Sensors TEA-42E TE-AA2B RCS LOOP 24 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I T/H B x 2 T9 -Tmperature Sensors TE.443 TE-A43 RCS LOOP 24 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIH x 2 21 In-~r & Control Panels & IP2.CB.53-N Cabinets CCR RACK AP A1tRACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH I INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I C21et CC RACK At Coto Pae,1 ýYS N 1P2-CB 20 'Inslo. Conotr Panels A CCR RACK A10:RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH II INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 Cabinets AT0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-13 of 42 SCREEN.R E...E .....* .. .REEN2 .SCREEN .lee Sofa 0 Funeteoh EQUICLAS:NT EQUIIPMEN DECIPTION 1j ,1 .* -'efreeo?.'.. ... .. Ir EEm 20 -nstr.& Conrol anels&rCCReACK A1 I;ACK RACTOCeROTCTIONCHCInINSTLOGICRACK YEeeN*YESoOeIl

.*.urt1 :. 6 .: l' IQ PalildC-tilCly 2 Cayinets IP2-CBS53 20 -onst. Control Panels & CCR RACK All:RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH II INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I Cabinets All 2 20 -,Ins .& Control Panel, & IP2.CB 2 aiesCCR RACK A 12 ARAC K REACTOR PROTECTION CH 11 INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 20 -lostr. & Control Pannts & I2CCB-RAC At2 RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CR11 INST LOGIC RACK YET NO YES NOI*2 Cabinets A12 20 -1not. & Control Panels & IP2-CB 2 Cabinets CCR RACK A2 A24RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CR I INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO 20 -Ilstr & Control Panels & IP2-CB Cabinets CCR RACK A3 A5;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CR I INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & IP2-CB 2 sCablnets CCR RACK AS A4;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION:CR I INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 Cabinets CCR RACK A4 5RC E O YS N 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & IP2-CB A 2 Cabinets CCR RACK AS A6:RAC K INSTRUMENT LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 205b Instn. & Control Panels & IP2-CS-BS-AS:RACK INSTRUMENT LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I *Cabinets CCR RACK A7 2 20 -lesS. S Control Panels S IP2,B-CeN-AT:RACK INSTRUMENT LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I Cabinets CCR RACKAll 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & IP2.CB 0Cbinstos CCR RACK AC A9:RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH 1E INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I a 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & IP2-CB 2 Cabinets CCR RACK BA :RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH III INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 Contol Panl,& P2-C13 20 -los. K Contol Panels & CCR RACK BA0;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH IV INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 Cabinets CCRCA 2 -netsR. SControl Panel P2-CB- RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH III INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I Cabients CCR RACK S2I ;RC 2 20

• 1,,u. & Control Panels & IP2-CB Ca0lnets CCR RACK B3 S3;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH III INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 20 -lnstr. & Control Panels & IP2-CB-S3-B6.RACK REATR OTEC T LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 Cabinets CCR RACK B6 2 20 -lnsSr. & Control Panels & IP2-CBS- R Ca2binet CCR RACK P8 BP:RACK INSTRUMENT LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 20 -Instr & Control Panels & IP2-CB Cabinos CCR RACK ST B9:RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CHIV INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 20 -lst, S Control Panels S IP2-CB 2O CCR RACK D1ORACK LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 Cabinets01 D10 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & IP2-CB-5O-ElRACK REACTOR CONTROL SYS INST RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 Cabinets CCR RACK E 1 2 20 leIsS. & Control Panels & IP2-CB.53-Cabinels CCR RACK E7 T7:RACK SAFEGUARDS RELAY CABINET YES NO YEN NO I 20 -Inst,. & Control Ponels & IP2-CB 5N Cabinets CCR RACK ER EILRACK SUPERVISORY CABINET YES NO YES NO I 20 -Inst. & Control Panels S EPK1 EPK1 SW PMP #21 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 H x 2 Cabinets 20 -ninslr. S Control Panels & EPK2 EPK2 SIN PMP 022 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 H 20 -Instr & Control Panels & EPK3 EPK3 SW PMP 023 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 H 2 Cabinets 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels K EPK5 EPK5 SW PMP 424 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 K 2 Cabinets 20 -Inst. Control Panels S EPK6 EPK6 SW PMP t25 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 H 2 Cabinets 20 -test. & Control Panels & EPK7 EPK7 SW PMP 926 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 H x 2 Cabinets 20 -Instr. & Control Panel, & IP2-CB-O3-Ft RACK REACTOR CONTROL SYS INST RACK YES NO YES NO I Cabinets CCR RACK F1 20 oInstr. & Control Panel, & IP2-CBN53-0 Cabinets CCR RACK F7 FT:RACK SUPERVSORY CABINET YES NO YES NO Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-14 of 42":-,'.. ." SC" "REN S 2 SC .EN3 SCREEN 4. Fi. Satiy Functon..U~' Mt UI VCLASB EQUj NTm EQUIPMENT E Q ltPUMEN!T;,D RlP Iqrg MFTihm k( Nnionot S 20 IItrr. & Control Panels & oP2-C-- FY 2 Cabinets CcR ROCK F8 8RC OI AK E O YS N 20O -=nor. & Control Panels & IP2-CS 2 Casinets CCR RACK Gl Gl:RRCK SAFEGUARDS RELAY CABINET YES NO YES NO Ix*20 .lestr. A Control Panels & lP2-CE-A3-G2:RACK SAFEGUARDS RELAY CABINET YES NO YES NO I *2 Cabinets CCR RACK 02 20 -Intr. & C ontrol Panels & IP 2-GC B ROCK S A RE I Cabinets CCR RACK Fa G3TRACK YES NO YES NO 20O -Instr* & Control Panels & IP2-CB C2binets CCR RACK GP G4:RACK SAFEGUARDS RELAY CABINET YES NO YES NO I 0 20 -loss. B Control Panels & IP2-CB-.3-SAF EGUAR D R E CA,?. YES NO I x 2 CabinelS CCR RACK G rRACK RYES NO 20 -Inslr & Control Panels & IP2-CB G2:RACK FOEBORO ROCK 02 EJAT YES NO YES NO I 2 Cabinets CCR RACK H2 20 -lnstr* & Control Panels & IP2-CB 2 Cabines CCR RACK AT H3:RACK FEGUARD RA Y CABINET YES NO YES NO I x 2 20 -Instr* & Central Panels & IP2-cB Cabinets CCR RACK H4 I FOXBORO RACK I4 CJANNL12 ~ t :EA YES NO YES NO I 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & IP2-CB HORACE FOXBORO RCK HO: CHANNEL 1 TRAIN BJ E NO YES NO I *2 Cabinets CCR RACK H 4 2 20 -lest,. A Control Panels & IP2-CE-ST-2 tCas Conts oanl CCR RCK -IS- AS:RACK FOXBORO ROCK HS: CHANNEL 2 TRAIN B: EJAK YES NO YES NO I 20 -tnstr. & Control Panels & PNL 'SYNCH DIESEL GENERATOR SYNCHRONIZING PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x 2 Cabinets 20 -instr. Control Panels A PNL EPAtO PAB EXH & CB PRG FAN 21 CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO 2 casinetso nx 2 20 -Itor. & Control Panels & EPGA PNLEPG6 REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CABINET. BUS YES NO YES NO I x x x Cobismo PN 2A 20 -Instr & Control Panels & PNL EPG T REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CABINET, BUS YES NO YES NO I x x x 0 2 Cabinets 5A 2 Cabin.. PG PNL EPG7 SABU YE 20 -Ilstr. & Control Panels & REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CABINET. BUS 2 Cabinets SF00 PNL EPG9 YES NO YES NO I x o

• x Cas -inos1 otolPnl PG N PG REMOTE SNDERYOLTAGE RELAY CABINET. BUS YES NO YES NO I a o o C~bi M6A 20 -lnstr. A Control Panels & PS PL PR N 2 20 -lest,. A Contro Panels B PNL FAT CCR PANEL YES NO YES NO I x *2 Casinots 0 0 0 0 c 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & 1P2-CB-53.-

2 Catbinets CCR PNL FEL FL FB FLIGHT PANEL FE YES NO YES NO I x 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels & IP2-CB P a x n N 2 Cabines CCR PNL FEt I PNL FBR FLIGHT CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x 2 Cabinets CCR PNL FER PLFR FIH OTO AE E O YS N 20 -Inst, & Control Panels & IP2-CB 2 Cabinets CCR PNL FC PNL FC FLIGHT PNL FC YES NO YES NO I It 20 -Ilstr, & Control Panels & IP2-CEB NL FCF FLIGHT PANEL YES NO YES NO I x 2 Cabinets CCR PNL FC 2 20 a1-t & Control Fannel PNL FDF FLIGHT CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x 2 1a0 lst, Coetrol Panels PNL MP3 CCR VENT CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I 0 N 0 0 2 Casinos 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & PNL PHGRP PRESSURIZER HEATER GROUND RELAY PANEL YES NO YES NO I x 2 Cabinots 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & PNL PP9 EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I

• a x x Cabinets 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & PNL POt EDG 22 CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I 2 Cabinet, 20 -lesst. Control Patrol & PNL P02 EDO 23 CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I 't 2 casinols 2 20 -Instr & Control Panel, &lCabinet.

s DPAN-PY3-1 PNL PY1 LOCAL CCR VENT CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I Nx

• 0 0 2 20- Instr & Control Panels 9 PNL PY2 REMOTE CCR VENT CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I Nx x Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Centel Panel, & IP2-CB 20Cables CCR PNL PNL PY2A-PY2 PANEL PY2 EXTENSION YES NO YES NO I xx

• x 2 Casinos PY2A I I II Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-15 of 42SCREEN" Fl :-l" ..."lo.."ISSEEMN 20 -Istr. &Contro Panel & C RPNL PN PY2B-Y2:'AELQPi2ME0T

-.ffON RE NOYETO I*xx SCREEN6it~

2 usarrrre Fle Slt Prsee 2ý CabietsPY2 In- Control Panels & IP2 CB-53-Cabin.et CCR PNL SAN E 2w ANT EXTENSION YES NO YES Ot 0-Int.&Control Panels & IP2-CB-53=

N ~ UEVSR AE E O YS N"t, .CC PNL SA SUEVSR COTO PAE YE NO YE~! S t NO A Ieda xrl< , ls~ iretn 2 Cabinets CR PNL SA x Ca-ins-e-t_

Ino ..AR PNL BB-1 SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I I e Ce* a 2 Catbinets CCR PNIL SB-1 PLS UEVSR AE E O YS N IP2-CB a20 Insr. & Control Panels A CCR PNL SBR- PNL SBIF ANNUNICATOR PANEL YES NO YES NO I Nx x 2 Cabinets P2-1 20 -lInst,. & Control Panels & IP2-08 PNL SB-2 SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I x xa 2 Cabinets CCR PNL SB-2 2 20 -Insir A Control Pannis & IP2-CS Cabinets CCR PNL SBR PNL SB2F ANNUNICATOR PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & IP2-CB K C X 2 CabineS CCR PNL SB-2 PNL SB-I SPERVSORY PANEL YES NO YES NO 2 20 -tost. a Control Panels & PNOPSC CONDENS-R

& FEEDWATER SUPERVISORY YES NO YES NO I Cabinets PANEL E 20 -tnstr. & Control Panels & IP20CB-53-SUPERVISORUPERVISOR PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x Cabinets CCR PNL SB NL SB 20 -lisS. A Control Panels & IP2-CB PNLSF SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x x 2 CC NL 2 20 instr & Control PanePs & B PAL SBFF SUPERVISORY CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I N a x 5 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & IP2-CB 2 Cabines CCR PNL SB PNL SG SUPERVISORY CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I *20 -Instr. & Control Panels A PAL SCS SUPERVISORY AYES NO YES NO I

• N 0 2 Cabinets CCR PNL SG I SUPEL 2 20 -Inssr. & Control Panels & IP2-CB N Cabinets CCR PNL SC PAL SO PRV PANEL YES I NO YES NOI 20 -ItrI. & Control Panets & IP2-CB 2 Cabinets CCR PNL SF PAL SF SSPAER YES NO YES NO I 5 N 20 -tnos. & Control Panels & IP2ACB-53 PNL SF SUPERVtSORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I Cabinets CRaPNLS 2 20 -Instr & ContCn PaSs & ORPA S PNL SN SUPERVISORY NELPANEL YES NO YES NO I r a r a a 2 CabInts CRPLS 20 -loJse,. A Control Panels A IP2-CSB RCC C AKC5YS N 2oCabi PAL SUF SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I a

• 5 5 20 -Ilst,. & Control Panels & IP2-CB-S3-Cablnets CCR RACK OH RACK CH CCR RACK CPN YES NO YES NO I r 20 -Inst. & Centrol Panels & IP2-CB 2 Cabinets OCR PALK SC PLS6C PNLYS N ES N 20 -lost,. & RACK C7 CCR RACK C-7 YES NO YES NO I x 2 Cabinets OCR PALK SL PLSCRPNLYS7O YS N 20 -Inst, & Control Panels & IP2-CB Cabinets CCRP RACK C8 RACK C8 CER RACK CPN YES NO YES NO I x 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels & RVLIS CAB EPHS RVLIS CABINET YES NO YES NO I I Cabinet, 2 21 C anin Heat E COhang 21RHRSHX 0021RHRSHX RHR PUMP 21 SEAL WATER HX YES NO YES NO I 2 21 -Tanks and Hea Ehangels 21RHX 0021RHX REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 21 YES NO YES NO I S 21 Tanks and HO Exhag 21RWST 0021RWST 21 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK YES NO YES NO 0 2 21 C anks and Heat ExOhange 21VCT 0021VCT VOLUME CONTROL TANK NO. 21 YES NO YES NO I a 2 21 C anes and HOat Exchangrs 22CCHX 0082CCHX CCW HEAT EXCH NO. 22 YES NO YES NO I CHARGING PUMP NO. 22 SUCTION 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Eechangers 22CHPS 0022CHPS STABILIZER/SEPARATOR YES NO YES B x Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-16 of 42-ENT2 SCR~~~SCREEN CREN2 SCREEN. .. SCREEN 4FeeSetFutin A, ., ..ý ,iCKAERIPN.

,. .at-- ;.I .:'.,,!'-' ;: -: ":":::' ; .. ':;; +; *S.... PEEE "ed. tlN R.o -y rnr ivnoy oo S... .o.l* "le-.o .,..o.. ,,,.oot :Ce.aln'n,.

2 21

• Tanks and Anal Exchangers 22EDJET 0O22EDJEI DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 JACKET WATER YES NO YES NO I x* x EXPANSION TANK 2 21

• Tanks and Anal Exchangers 22EESAT SS22EESAT START AIR TANK 22SS YES NO YES NO I I x 0 x 2 21 -Tanks and Anal Exchangers 22FOOE SS22FOGT FUEL OIL DAY TANK NO. 22 YES NO YES NO O e n n 2 421_. Tacks and Heal Exchangnrs 22FOST 0022FOST F'.0 STORAGE TANK 22 YES NO 'YES NO 0 n 0 x n 2 21 -Sacks aAndHal Ecchangnrs 22IACA EE22IACA INST AIR COMP 22 AFTERCOOLER YES NO YES NO I a n a o 2 21 -Tanks and Anal Eschacnaes 22RRHX T022RHRAX EAR HEAT ESCA NO. 2' YES NO YES NO I TIH S 2 21 -Tanks and Anal Eechangnrs

!22RHRSHS SS22RARSAX 22 KARP SEAL WATER AS YES NO YES NO I x0 2 21 -Eanks acd Anal Exchangers

!23CHPS 0O23CHPS CHARGING PUMP NO. 23 SUCTION YES NO YES NO I 0_____ ____________________STASILIZER/SEFARATOR 2 21 -Tacks and Anal Eechangers 23EDJET SS22EDJET DIESEL GENERAEOR NO. 23 JACKET WATER YES NO YES NO I EXPANSION TANK 2 21 -Sacks and Anal Exchangers 23EDSAT 0E23EGSAT START AIR YANK 2200 YES NO YES NO I a C a o 2 21 -Tacks and Anal Ecchangnrs 23FODT 0T23FODT FUEL OIL EAY TANK NO. 23 YES NO YES NO I n a

• n 2 21 -Tanks and Anal Eachangers 23FOST 0O23FOST F.O. STORAGE TANK 23 YES NO YES NO 0 n a

• a 2 21 -Tanks end Aeat Exchangers 21BAT 21BAE BORIC ACID EASE YES NO YEN NO I 2 21 -Tanks and Anal Exchangcrs 21CCHS 21CCHS CCW AEAT EACH NO021 YES NO YES NO I 2 21 -Tanks and Heal Ershangees 2ICCSY 21CCST 21 COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANK YES NO YES YES V-D0l Ix 2 21 -Tanks and Heal Exchangers 21CHPS 21CAPS CHARGINGEPUMPAT NO.2RUTO YES NO YES NO I a iiSTE E-A ILIU ID EP ' ARAT OR 2 21 -Tacks and Anal Exchangers 21EO JET 21EDJET DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 JACKET WATER YES NO YES NO I 0 0 0 a a_!__ -XV PAN S ION TANK 2 21 -Taknksand Anal Exchangers 2IEDSAT 2lEESAT STAYT AIR TANK 21EG YES NO YES NO I a

• a 2 21 -Tanks and Heal Exchangers 21ELHX 2lELAX EXCESS LETDOWN AX NO,.21 YES NO YES NO I 2 21 -Tanks and Heal Eachangers 21 FOOT 21FODT FPO. DAY TANK NO. 21 YES NO YES NO I a a x a 2 21 -Tanks and Anal Exchangers 21FOST 21FOST F.O. STORAGE TANK 21 YES NO YES NO 0 a 0 0 0 2 21 -Tanks and Heal Eechangers 21NRHX 2INRHX NON REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO021 YES NO YES NO I 2 21 -Tanks and Anal Exchangers FIRSY 2IPWST PRIM WATER STORAGE TANK YES NO YES NO O a 2 21 -Tanks and Heal Exchangers 21RRHS 21RHRHS RARHEAE EXCHANGER NO. 21 YES NO YES NO I a 2 21 -Tanks and Heal Exchangnrs 22BAT 22BAT BORIC ACID TANK YES NO YES NO I S a 2 21 -Tanks end Aeat Eachangers APORVAU APORVAU N2 ACCUM FOR PCV455C YES NO YES REOV I TIA 21 -Tanks and ANal Exchangers EPORSAU BPORYAU N2 ACCUM FOR PCV4 YES NO YES REMOVE I TH*2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers CST CST CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK YES NO YES NO 0 2 05 -Geneic Anput Formc ESAR.1 EUHR-21 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO 2 21 -G nnerc InpEu Fxrng EUHR-22 EUHR-22 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 SE -Gendnc Inpe. xorrm EUHR-23 EUHR-23 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 21 -GTancsn Heet FErm n FU2R-2CA TUR-e2 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 DO -Genedc InpHet Pear EUAR-22 EUHR-25 ELECTRIC SNIT HEATER YES NO YES NO I 2 OS -Generic Inpud FHea EUER-3E EUHR-32 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-17 of 42 ScR 2 SCREEN 4.F....:.., .. ..e.EN-Ge n EUNRRT E EUN EE Y 2___ OR -sEu E N NO , I 2 00 -Genedc -nput r- EUHR-33 EUHR-33 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 00 -Oenenc Inpul ernm EUHR-35 EUHR-33 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 00 Generic Input Tern EUHR-36 EUHR-36 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO 1 2 ST0 Generic Input Term EUHR-37 ELUHR-3T ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 00 Genenc Input Term H2-21 HYDROGEN SUPPLY MANIFOLD #21 YES NO NO YES I 2 00 -Generi Input er-m N2-XX NITROGEN SUPPLY PACKAGE YES NO NO YES I 2 05 -Horzontal Peeps SPBP PSS-SBP R.C. SAMPLE BOOSTER PUMP YES NO NO REMOVE I 2 UT7 -Flid-Operated Valves 261A 0261A 21 RCP SEALWATER RET VALVE YES NO NO -NO I /IH B 2 U7 -Fluid-Operated Valves 261B 0261N 22 RCP SEAL WATER RET VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 261C 0261C 23RCP SEAL WATER RET VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 261D 02610 24 RCP SEAL WATER RET VALVE YES NO NO NO I TVH B 2 07 -TFled-Operated Valves 553A 0553A STAND PIPE MAKE-UP VALVE RCP 21 YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -FluId-Opereted Valves 553B 0553B STAND PIPE MAKE-UP VALVE RCP 22 YES NO NO NO I TIH B 2 0S -Fluid-Operated Valws 553C 0553C STAND PIPE MAKE-UP VALVE RCP 23 YES NO NO NO I TM/ B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valus 553D 0553D STAND PIPE MAKE-UP VALVE RCP 24 YES NO NO NO I TIH B 2 07 -Fluid Operaled Valves 783A 0783A 21 RCP RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Opemred Valves 783B 0783B 22 RCP RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I TIH B 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves 783C 0783C 23 RCP RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H N 2 07 -Peid-Openated Valves 783D 07830 24 RCP RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I TIH B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Vales 819A 08U9A INLET RHR HX 22 RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I TIH B 2 07 -Fluid Operaled Valves 819B 0819B INLET RHR HX 21 RELIET VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fleid-Operaled Valves 821H 0821H RETURN FROM RV SUPRTS RLF VALVE YES NO NO YES I B 2 07 Fleid-Opereled Valves 1649 1640 N2 SUPPLY HEADER RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluld-Operated Valves 1671 1671 H2 HEADER RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 ST -TIlid-Operalnd Valvs 1131 1131 RHR PURIFICATION LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valvs 218 218 SEAL WTR RETURN RLF VALVE TO PRT YES NO NO NO I N 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valws 231 231 21 CHARGE PMP RLF VALVE TO VCT YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -Fluid-Operled Valves 234 234 22 CHARGE PMP RLF VALVE TO VCT YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -Flued-Operated Valves 237 237 23 CHARGE PMP RLF VALVE TO VCT YES NO NO YES I N 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valvs 2 24-VLV 246 RCP SEAL NO.1 BYPASS VALVE TO VCT YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -Fluid-Operled Valves 263 263 21 NON-REGEN HX RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Flvid-Openaled Valvs 264 264 VCT RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-OpenaledI 2 07 -Fluid Opemled Valves 265 1 265 VCT GAS ANALYZER SAMPLE VALVE YES NO NO I NO-I + -4 + -4 +/- -+------------------+----------I-------------I- -I I- + f-I- I-lalves ZEN 260 VCT VENE ISO VALVE YES NO NO NO Val1-268 268 VCT VENT ISO VALVE YES i NO i NO I NO Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-18 of 42 4 S.E N SCRE "IRE S.F.WET ~ ~ Q SSEUPCuS dJ ENT Undergo Maln,ý,DEýRIt an 6~RpIrr~e EQ"U..UENT,"..SCRIPTIO"':--- " " " w: ". '" ... "Tll eua~ Pes"r :"nntry " ".smc.-t geiinr..-,'--'ebud MEE oui.r-, .." c, -.c,,- cannel ... ..2 07 Fluid-Operated Values 4058 4058 INLET TO VCT RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 V0 Fluid-Operated Valus 4105 4105 PCV-456 N2 SUPPLY RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 Fluid-Operated Values 4106 4106 PCV455C N2 SUPPLY RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 Flued.Operated Vales 5S6-LV 516 PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK VENT VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H 2 T7 FluId-Operated Valus 523 523 PRT DRAIN VALVE YES NO NO NO I I/H 2 07 Fluid.Operated Values 5417 5417 R.C. BOOSTER PUMP DISCH RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO REMOVE I T[H 2 07 -Fluid-Opemted Values 5418 5418 R.C. BOOSTER PUMP SUCTION RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO REMOVE I T/H 8 D 2 ' 07 Fluid-Operated Values 544 544 REACTOR VESSEL FLANGE LEAK-OFF CTRL YES NO NO NO I T/H VALVE 2 07- Fluid-Operated Values 560 560 PRIMARY WATER MAKE-UP TO PRT YES NO NO YES I T/H 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 782 782 CCW RETURN FROM RCPs RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 8TH 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Vales 792 792 EXCESS LETDOWN HX RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 1TH 2 O7 -Fluid-Operated Values 802 802 SPENT FUEL PIT HX RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I OPI 07 -Flaid-Operated Values SOP 807 SEAL WATER HX RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 812 812 NON-REG HX RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 835 835 SURGE TANK RELIEF YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values BFD-69 BED-69 22 ABF/VP 8RG COOLING WATER RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values CC-56 CC-56 CC INLET TO AFTERCOOLER 21 RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 O7 -Fluid-Operated Values CC-56-1 CC-56-1 CC INLET TO AFTERCOOLER 22 RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 Flaud-Operated Valveu CT-35 CT-35 AFP 21 SUCTION LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 1 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values CT-35-1 CT-35-1 AFP 22 SUCTION LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values CT-35-2 CT-35-2 AFP 23 SUCTION LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 T7 -Fluid-Operated Vales DF-13 DF-13 DAY TANK NORM FILL RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valus DF-14 OF-l4 DAY TANK EMERGENCY FILL RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values DF4 DS-4 21 FOSS FUEL LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operted Values OF-a-I DF-4-1 22 FOST FUEL LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values DF-4-2 DF-4-2 23 FOOT FUEL LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operamted Values HCV-133 HCV-133 RHR PURIF LINE CONTROL VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 0 -Fluid-Operated Values HCV-3003 HCV-3003 SEAL WTR RET FLT BYPASS VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 OP -Fluid-Operated Valuee LCV- 11iA LCV-112A MAKE-UP OT VCT 3-WAY VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Val.s MS-52 MS-52 AFWP 22 STEAM SUPPLY SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 1 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values PCV-1041 PCV- 1041 H2 SUPPLY TO VCY SOUTH BANK PRESS CTRL YES NO NO NO I VALVE I N 2 07 Fluid-Operated Values PCV-1042 PCV-1042 82 SUPPLY TO UCY NORTH BANK PRESS CTRL YES NO NO NO VALVE 2 O7 -Fluid-Operavd Values PCV-1043 PCV-1043 N2 SUPPLY TO VCT PRESS CTRL VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 O7 -Fluid-Opelated Values PCV-1044 PCV-1044 N2 SUPPLY TO VCT PRESS CTRL VALVE YES NO NO NO I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-19 of 42 SCREEN Fim Funct~n i: ~ E ......NTDESCRIPTIN 2 07 Fluid-Operated Values PCV-1 13A PCV-113A H2 SUPPLY TO VCT REG VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 Fluid-Operated Values PCE-114 PCV-114 N2 SUPPLY TO VCT REG VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 Fluid Operated Values PCV-1284 FEY1284 RELIEF VALVE N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values SWN42-1 SWN-42-1 FCU-21 SW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values SWN42-2 SWN-42-2 FCU-22 SW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values SWN42-3 SWN.42-3 FCU-23 SW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valus SWN SWN-424 FCU-24 SW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 07 -Flw-Opeamled SWN-42.5 SWN-42-5 FCU-25 SW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 07 -Fluid-Operaled Valves SWN-63 SWN-63 DG-22 JW LO CLRS CW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values SWN-A3-1 SWN-63S- DG-23 JW& LO CLRS CW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values SWN-63-2 SWN.63-2 DG-21 JW A LO CLRS CW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Val-es SWN-81 SWN-8i CCW HX 22 SW OUTLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valus SWN-81-1 SWN-81-1 GCW HX 21 SW OUTLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valws SWN-86 SWN-86 21 IA COOLER SW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valws SWN-A6-1 SWN-86-1 22 IA COOLER OW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves TCV-149 TCV-149 NON-REGEN HX FLOW OUTLET 3-WAY YES NO NO NO I 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 955A-VLV 0955A BORON SAMPLE LINE ISO VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 08A -Motor-Operated Values 955B-VLV 0955B BORON SAMPLE LINE ISO VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 GBA -kMtor-Operated Valves 95EE-VLV 0956E BORON SAMPLE LINE ISO VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 08A -Muter-Operated Values 956F-VLV 0956F BORON SAMPLE LINE ISO VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 08A -Muter-Operated Values 227 227 HCV-142 BYPASS CH FLOW TO RCS VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 08A -Motor-Operated Values 4394 4394 FLUSH WATER TO RCS SAMPLE HX CTRL VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 08A -Motor-Operated Values 4395 4395 FLUSH WATER TO RCS SAMPLE HX CGRL VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 4396 4396 R.C. SAMPLE BOOSTER PUMP INLET ISO VALVE YES NO NO REMOVED I TIH 2 08A -Motor-Operated Values 4397 4397 R.C. SAMPLE BOOSTER PUMP OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO NO REMSVED I T/H B 2 08A -Moter-Operated Valves SWN-6i7 SWN-617 STRAINER BACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-618 SWN-61R STRAINER BACGWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 08A -Muter-Operaled Values SWN-619 SWN-619 STRAINER BACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 08A -Mutr-Operated Valves SWN-620 SWN-620 STRAINER BACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 08A -Motor-Operated Values SWN-621 SWN-621 STRAINER BACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 08A -Motur-Operated Valves SWN-622 SWN-622 STRAINER BACKWASH [SO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 088 -Sol.e.id-Operated Values SOV-215 SOV-215 215 INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID YES NO NO NO I S A08B -Selenoid-Operated Values SOV.268 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 OAB -Selenoid-Operated Values SOV-3003 SOV-3003 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 GAB -Solee.id-Opemled Values SOV-310 SOV-310 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO NO NO I N Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-20 of 42 SCREEN 2 SCEN3.SCREEN 4 FlSee oiy Function.-E4 f 4 ." .. ... ....IN E IPUýEUP'CLS' -fU~!MO F1EqTIJE SCRIRTION-.

TtICosei Cnnt Cnnl Raol ID ;'J ..~Rs~~ EEE eIon raoe Ienny ~ C I DSP- Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-3418 S-3418 N2 SUPPLY To PRO YES NO NO NO C 2 08 -Soleoid-Operated Valves SOV-3419 SOV-3419 N2 SUPPLY TO PRT YES NO NO NO I 2 08B -Salenoid-Operated Valves SOV-544 SOV-544 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 9 -Fans 22CRDF 0022CRDF CONTROL ROD DRIVE VENT FAN 22 YES NO NO YES I TIH 2 09 -Fans 23CRDF 0023CRDF CONTROL ROD DRIVE VENT FAN 23 YES NO NO YES I TIH ST0 -Fans 24CRDF P024CRUF CONTROL ROD DROVE VEND PAN 24 YES NO NO YES I T/H 2 09 -Pans FS FIRESTAI FOR FAN 22 YES NO NO YES 2 14 -Dnstd on Panels WV7 WVP FUSE BOX 21 YES NO NO NO 2 14 -Distribution Panels WV8 WV8 FUSE BOX 22 YES NO NO NO 2 18 I-nstruements on Racks BCT 2231 R LIGHTING PNL #223 T RAJNSFORMER YES NO NO YES 2 19 -Temperature Sensors ELJ-10 ELJ-10 EDO LODG THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES 2 19 -Temperature Sensors ELJ-1 I ELJ- 11 EDG BLDG THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES I 2 19 -Temperature Sensors ELJ-12 ELJ-12 EDG BLODG THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES 2 19 -Temperature Sensos ELJ-13 ELJ-13 EDG BLDG THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES I 2 19 -Temperature Sensors ELJ-14 ELJ 14 EDG PLDG THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES I 2 19 -Terperalre Sensors ELJ-15 ELJ 15 EDOG LDG THERMOSTAT YES NO NO NO I 19 -Tomperalure Sensors ELJ-19 ELJ-19 EDOG LDG THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES I 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TC-6995 1S2S TC-6995 THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES I 2 19 -Temperature Sensors fE-120T-1 TE-1203T-FAN COIL UNIT 21 T.E. YES NO NO NO I 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-1203-2 TE-1203-2 FAN COIL UNIT 22 T.E. YES NO NO NO I 2 19 -Temperaure Sensors TE-1203-3 TE. 1203-3 FAN COIL UNIT 23 T.E. YES NO NO NO I 2 19 -Temperaoure Sernors TE-1203-4 TE-1203T4 FAN COIL UNIT 24 T E. YES NO NO NO I 2 19 -Ternpenrture Sensors TE-1203-5 TE-1203-5 FAN COIL UNIT 25 T.E. YES NO NO NO I 2 19 -Pemperatore Sensors TE-122 TE-122 EXCESS LETDOWN PEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I 19 -Tomperalore Sensors TE-126 TE-126 CHG FLOW TO RCS TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I B 2 19 -Tempemalere Sensors YE-127 TE-127 CHG FLOW TO RCS TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I P 2 19 -Temperalere Sensors TE-13D TE-130 NON REOHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I P 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE453 TE-453 PRESSURIZER LIOUID SPACE TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO YES I T/H B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE454 TE454 PRESSURIZER STEAM SPACE TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 19 -Temperture Sensors TE471 TE.471 PRT TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO YES I T/H B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TEAT36 TE.636 RHR HX TEMP INLET TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I TIH B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-639 DE-639 RHR HX OUTLET TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I T1l P 2 19 -Pemperatare Sensors TE-7197 TE-7197 THERMOSTAT YES NO NO NO I 2 19 -Temperatore Sensors TE-7198 TE-7198 THERMOSTAT YES NO NO NO I 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-7199 TE-7199 THERMOSTAT YES NO NO NO Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-21 of 42 SC CE EEN2 3 SCREEN 4 F"Sft im~.. ......r-.s. 1" ....-..I-: ' , ....-E. .,

.--..,-N Flee4 S,, ftR F..ood ...e.., .U 11 R1,_ ..m~ti at .D 2 19 Teperalura Sensors TE-7220 THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES a 20 Inslr & Contrl Panels 8 CRPI CTRL ROD CLUSTER POS INO SYSTEM YES NO NO NO 2 Cabinets ______ ________________

2 18 -Inslroels c Racks EDOS ED5 EDOG #21 CONTROL CIRCUIT TRANSFORMER 2 18-n e n s ED-5 D5 SWITCH YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 Inslrments oe Racks EDD-6 EDO6 EDG#22 CONTROL CIRCUIT TRANSFORMER YES NO Note I NO I SWITCH 2 18 -eInstrments on Racks EDD-7 EDD7 EDG O23 CONTROL CIRCUIT TRANSFORMER YES NO Note 1 NO I SWITCH 2 18

• Insrments on Racks EDMI EDMI SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Note 1 NO I SWITCH 2 18 -Instrumentso Racks EDM EDM2 SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Note 1 NO I SWITCH 2 18 -lnstruents on Racks EDM3 EDM3 SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Note 1 NO I SWITCH 2 18 Instruments on Racks EDM4 EDM4 SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Note I NO I SWITCH 2 18 -Icstrumants on Racks EDM5 EDMS SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Note 1 NO I SWITCH 2 18 -Icnostmoes cn Racks EOMR E01j5 SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Note 1 NO I SWITCH 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FC.6830-S FC-6830-S FLOW SWITCH YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instruments -n Racks FC-7145-IS FC-7145-tS FLOW SWITCH YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -InstIments on Racks FC-7145-2S FC-7145-2S FLOW SWITCH YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -l enls on Racks FIC-5919 FIC-5919 YES NO Not. I NO I 2 18 -Inslcenes on Racks FIT-111 FIT ItI FLOW INDICATOR TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instrmencs on Racks FIT-156A FIT-156A RCP 24 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I T/H B 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FIT-156B FIT-156B RCP 24 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 YES I TIH B 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FIT-157A FIT-157A RCP 23 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 YES I T/H B 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FIT-157B FIT-157B RCP 23 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 YES I TiH 8 2 18 lnslemeets on Racks FIT-158A FIT,158A RCP 22 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 YES I T/H B 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FIT-158B FIT-158B RCP 22 SEAL LEA OFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TWH B 2 I -Instluments on Racks FIT-159A FIT-159A RCP 21 SEAL LEAKOFE FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TIH B 2 18 -Instrurents on Racks FIT-159B FIT-159B RCP 21 SEAL LEANOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I T/H a 2 18 Instrurenlse

-Racks FM-IlA FM-1 IcA P SIGNAL TRANSDUCER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 Instrucrens on Racks FT-1200 FT-1200 AFW TO SG 21 FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FT-1201 FT 1201 AFW TO SG 22 FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instlrments on Racks FTF1202 FT 1202 AFW TO SO 23 FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FT- 1203 FT-1203 AFW TO SG 24 FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instalments on Racks FT-128 FT-128 CHG FLOW TO REGEN HX TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I B 2 ISi Iestrsmecls on Racks FT-134 T NON REGEN HX OUTLET LETDOWN FLOW YES NO Note I YES I 8 TRANSMITTER 2 18 -Unstlmects on Racks FT-414 FT-414 RX COOLANT LOOP I FLOW TRANSMITTER CH I YES NO Note I YES I TIH 2 18 -Instrumees on Racks FT-15 FT-15 RX COOLANT LOOP 1 FLOW TRANSMITTER CH 11 YES NO Note 1 YES I Tl B Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-22 of 42 SSREN 2-SCREENet SCREEN 29A F-4EREE SCREEN 4 FtW. SuNTENF-toYEoT 2 8- Instr ...ts. ..R. ..s.T. ...F.4C34 fioCOOLANT LOOPW3 FLOW""TRANSMIeTER CHBItYES CNottoteCooYES I T/H 2 18 -Insttensons on Racko FT-1i9A FT-419A SG 21 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITETER YES NO Note 1 YES I Y/H 2 18 -In~slrcenons non Racks FT.a39B FF41398 SG02 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 YES I Till 2 18 -Instrumenls on Racks FT.424 FF424 RX COOLAN T LOOP 2 FLOW TRANSMITTER CH I YES NO Note I YES I T/Hl 2 18 -Instsmonto on Racks FT.-445 FT.-445 RXy COOLANT LOOP 2 FLOW TRANSMITTER CH ll YES NO Note 1 YES I T/H 2 18 -lostromonts on Racks FT-42TA FT-429A SG 22 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 1/H 2 18 -Inslomoents on Racks FT-4498 SG022 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TIN 2 18 -Inslrormenls on Racks FT-5919 FT-54 R COAT OP FO RASITE g YES NO Note I YES I S/ 8 2 18 -Instrumenls on Rocks FTtS8A FE-60A SG2 SATEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YET I TI 2 18 -onstcrments on Racks FT-6408 FF-458 902SEA FLOW TRANSM iTTER YES NO Note I YET I TIHN 2 18 -Iostumennts on Racks FT-946A FF-484 RART RS2 COOATLOPD 4 FLOW TRANSMITTERC YET NO Note 1 YET I TI/H 2 18 -Instrumnents on Racks FT-944B FT-A4TA R5R 24 RSTEAM LDL FLOW TRANSMITTER R YES NO Note 1 YES I 9/A 18t -Instrouments on Racks FT-4986 FT-946C 51R 24 RSTEAM LDL FLOW TRANSMITTER , YETSO Nt E /2L8InOOPnso Rcs TSt2F518YT NO Note 1 NO I /2 18 -InstrumennnsonoRacks FT-946D FT-A4l RHR WTE RS2 CLLG FLOW TRANSMITTER , YET NO Note 1 YES I T/2 18 -lonstrmonts os Racks LT-112 FT-N12 RAR FLOWE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I I/ 8 2 18 -Insorumntsl on Rocks LT- 1428 LT-NA RAR8 TON SORAET2 COLT LEG FLO TRANSMIT TER. YES NO Note 1 NO I 1/ 8 2 18 -Instromonts on Racks F T-11288 FT- 2A RHRD STORCGT 2COTAN LEGVFLO TRANSMITTER.

YET NO Note I NO I 1/ 8 2 18 -lnstoments on Racko FT. 131C FT-Sa31 RR2O R ETS2S OL E G FLOWTRASM TTE ERANGMEER YES NO Note 1 NOS I T/A 2 18 -Insltrunenls on Racks FT-S17D LT-,47D RASO RCSEVE 21ROLA LGSLOWTRNSITER YES NO Note 1 NOS I TINH 2 18 -Instrumenns on Racks LT-,12DA LT-127A SG LEVELLCOTROLLER TERYES NO Note I NO I TIH 2 18 -Instlrmenolo on Racks LT-1127 LT-127 VCT2 LEVEL TRANSMITTER TAT NO Note 1 NOS I 8/2 18 -*Instruments on Rocks ILT-1128A LT-128A COG STORAGEL TRANKLVLTASMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I TI 2 18 -Instcrmonts on Racks LT-017A LT-417A SG 23 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YET NO Note 1 NOS I TIN 2 18 -Inlstrments on Racks LT-4ATA LT-A44A SG 24 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I TIN Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-23 of 42.a l 4.... " ".... ... .....**. SCREEN.....

'SrSC,.. .SCREEN 4 Fy..'....a..

CJJRREN SSELL>$ ct-dr 2 W-nun R sPUDT-7 S ETUNIPtTESCR YPETSO NO Not 1 YEE TIH 2 18 -IDn'~menSeismic?

k- LT$59 LT-o5 EEE-SURIHERs LEVEL TRANSMTTEReCH I IESeNOrNot-CeNOuIoT/H IspdlWe d?%oie coNvtalvpta 2 18 Instruments on Racks LST4470 LT-670 SGS24 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note YES I TIH 2 18 Insl-monts on Racks LT-459 LT-4aS PRESSURIZER LEVEL TRANSMITTER CN I YES NO Note. NO I T/H 2 18 -Instumons on Racks LT-460 LT-47R PRESSURIZER LEVEL TRANSMITTER CN 11 YES NO Note I NO I O IN 2 18 on Racks LT-470 LT-470 PRT LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I TIN 2 t18 IcstcaconsolosRa~cks LI-S751 LT-S75t RWST LEVEL TRANUSMITTER YES NO Nets t NO 0 2 tE Iscnusienoan Racks LT-920 LT-920 RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note t NO 0 2 18 -Instltmens s on Racks PCV-473 PCV-473 N2 SUPPLY TO PRT YES NO Note 1 YES I 2 18 -Instcrments on Racks PM-t134 PMi 1134 PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note 1 YES 1 2 18 *Insrulments on Racks PM- 1135 PM-1135 PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 Instrments on Racks PM-1136 PM-t 136 PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instorments on Racks PM-1137 PM-1137 PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Ilstrments on Racks PM-135 PM-135 UP PRESSURE CONVERTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PM-05A PM405A PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instrumets on Racks PM-405B PM-405B PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instrumels on Racks PM-405C PM-405C PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Insh-srcoes on Racks PM-405D PM-405D PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -lnsorcnols on Racks PM-406E PM-406E PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Noto I NO I 2 18 -tnslrments on Racks PM06AF PM-406F PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PM-406G PM-406G PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I YES I 2 58 -Icstmelnts on Racks PM-4SRH PM-4ARE PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instrments on Racks PNL #1 STEAM DUMP VALVE LOCAL PANEL 01 YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 18 -Erstcsmels on Racks PNL N2 STEAM DUMP VALVE LOCAL PANEL 82 YES NO Note t NO I 2 18 -InslmmeIns on Racks LP-223 PNL 8223 LIGHTING PANEL YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -InssIrments on Racks PRV- 1139-1 PRV-1 139-1 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES NO Notes NO I 2 18 -Vnstasments on Racks PRV-1139-2 PRV-1 139-2 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES NO Notes YES I-18 -Inscrments on Racks PRV- 1139-3 PRV-1139-3 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PRV-1139-4 PRV-1139-4 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES NO Notes NO I 2 18 -Instruments an Racks PRV-1139-5 PRV-1139-5 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES NO Nota 1 NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PRV-5924 PRV-5924 PRESS REG TO CCR PANEL YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instmcts on Racks PT-1144 PT-isI1 STATION AIR NUCL SERVICE PRESS YES NO Note 1 NO I TRANSMITTER 2 18 -Instrmcents on Racks PT-1190 PT-1190 SWP 21-23 DISCH HNR (LINE 109) PRESS YES NO Note I NO I TRANSMITTER TO PI-119OR 2 18 -Instumnts on Racks PT-1191 PT.1191 SVC WATER NUCL HEADER PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note. NO I 2 18 -Insoc m ncs on Racks PT-1112 PT-11si IACC WATER PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 18 -.n-sascns on Racks PT-1260 PT-12E0 AFW 21 DISCHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Nose 5 YES I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-24 of 42 EE X TELT WPSCREN N N 8 -ns m t onRac s PT-39 T- 9 SVCT PR SCRSN rRANSMITTE Y SNONoteO 2L8-Isrmnso acsS ET-42 T.-,' 2 CHEPPDISHAREEPE TR NSMTE YE I N Note 1 NO I 2 18- Instrmments on Racks P1-02A1 PT-416A 21 AFEW 22 DISCHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 Ins mments on Racks PT 12R2B PT -412A APIM 23 SISOHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 YESO 2 18 Instrunments non Racks PT-4135 PT-135 NONP REE HEOUTLETLTDW PRESSUR RNMTE YES NO Note 1 NO I SEATRANSMIE 2 18 Instruments on Racks PT139B PTt29B AC 1 TE PRESSUR TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I No 2 18 -Inslrsments on Racks PT-142g PT-419 080 PP DSCHARM PRESS TRANSMIT tER YES NO Note 1 NOI 2 18 -Inutnimonts on Racks PT.42A PT-4T2E LOO 21 HOTLEAM PRESSUR TRANSMIT ETER YES NO Note 1 YES I TH 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-4293 PT..293 LOO 24 HOTLEA PRESSUR TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TI 2 18

• Instments on Racks PT-4126 PT-4126 2HW 22 DISCHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instnments on Racks PT-1426 PT-126 22 A 23PP DISCHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Inslmments on Racks PT-413 PT-135 LOO 21 HOEAM L PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Inssments on Racks PT-139A 3021 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Insterments on Racks PT419, PT-1,2 S2G P STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instluments on Racks PT413C PTE4C LOOP 21 HOT LEG PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 18 -Instrments on Racks PT1428A PT429A SD 24 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-426A PT-406A SG22 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 1 Instruments on Racks PT.429C PT-449C 50 22 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instrsments on Racks PT-413 PT.433 LOOP 23 HOT LE PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-419A PT-4569A SG2 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -instUsments on Racks PT1957 PT-415 S 5023 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO H 2 18 -Instruments en Racks PT-419C PT419C SG21 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instrumerus en Racks PT74- PT-4743 LOPR 24SHOTLED PRESSURE CIVTRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Inscntments on Racks PT-299A PT-49A 502 4 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instrmmonts on Racks PT .4258 PT-4-198 5024 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO j I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-94IC PT-482AC SG2 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 18

• Instruments on Racks PT-A4S PT-4SS PORESSUIZER PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 18 Instrments on Racks PT439A PTWEA PRSG3SURIERM PRESSUR AI TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1I OI t 2 18 Instrments on Racks PT-8573 PT4SB PRSG3SURIERM PRESSUEC I TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NOI TH 2 18 .Instruments on Racks PT-S49A P5993 RHR PUM DST CAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-A9RC PT.848C CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 YES I 2 18 .Ins~sments oc Rocks PT-456 PT-456 CONTAUINMENT PRESSURE C 1TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I /2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT.A98A PT-948A CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instsments on Racks PT-948B PT-94SA CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 YES I 2 18 -Instruents cc Racks PT-949B PT-949B CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YESI Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-25 of 42 SCR:y SCREEN 2. ":EENJ " .Flve ..f.utiUons A SS-i U3CQREEN4PETI

~ iFPTR 2 18 -ntlens Racks PT-949C PT-949C CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Not, I YES I 2 18 Instssrument, o Racks SC-141A SC-141A CHARGE PP SPEED CONTROL-LOCAL YES NO Note I NO 1 2 1. -jstments c, Racks SC-141B SC-141B CHARGE PP SPEED CONTROL-LOCAL YES NO Not. I NO I 2 18 -nj on Racks SC- 1IDC SC-141C CHARGE PP SPEED CONTROL-LOCAL YES NO Note I NOI 2 20abinets F-1200 Fl- 1200 APV TO S O 21 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Ca- .1stb 20 -linstr & Control Paneln s & F-1201 A IS-1201 AFW TO S P 22 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 20 -Instr. & Control Panels &2 Ctinets Fe-1202 FR-1202 AFR TO SG 23 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 20 -Instr. &AConel Panels S Fl-1203 Ft-1203 AFW TO SO 24 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO 1 2 Cabintets 20 Instr S Control Poneis FI-2 CHG FLOW TO REGEN HX INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO 2 Cabinetts 2 20 -Instr & Control Panel, & PI14 F-14 NON REGEN HX OUTLET LETDOWN FLOW 2C.bi.Nts FI-13D FI-15 INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panes &2 Cabtncet Fl.I.14 FI-414 P-X COOLANT LOOP 1 FLOW INDICATOR YES No Note I NO I T/H 20 -testr. & Control Panels & F15 Fl-,203 AF TO S O24 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO 20 nlt,. &Control Panel& FI-42 1 '2 FI.4 RX COOLANT LOOP R FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/H-Cabinets 2 Cabinets NF1-2 FO-425 RX COOLANT LOOP 2 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/H 20 -instr. & Control Panels " F1-425 FI43t RX COOLANT LOOP 1 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIH 2 Cabinets 2C -Inst,. A Conrol Panels & FI-434 FI-434 RX COOLANT LOOP 3 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIH 2 Cabinets 2 21 -Instr " Control Panels &2 sCab rNets FI425 FF-425 RX COOLANT LOOPS FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I T5H 2 0Cabinesr.&onrlPns&

20 -nest,. C l4 F1.434 AX COOLANT LOOP 3 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I T/H 2 Cabinets & oOOP 2 2 sintr s Control Panels & FI.460 FI4 0 COOLANT LOOP FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIN 20 -Instr. & Control Panels &2 Cabints FI-640 FI.601 AX CA NTE F LOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TA-20 -ImrE. 8 Control Proofs S FI64 1-6401 CR ATR FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO T/2 Cobinrts 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & FI-946A 1I-946A RHR TO RCS 24 COLD LEG FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/H 2 Cabinets 20 -Instr. & Control Panels &2CabinesS FC-946B FI-946B RHR TO RCS 23 COLD LEG FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I TIH 2 0Cabinest.&onrlaes&

2 sr. & Control Panel e FI-946C FI-946C RHR TO RCS 22 COLD LEG FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TiH Cabinets 2 b- ins. Centel Panes & FI-406D FI-946D RHR TO RCS 21 COLD LEG FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIH Cabinets I 2 C1bInet &ControlPanels

& FC-11t FIC-111 DEMIN.WATER FLOW IND. CONTROL ITEM 11B YES NO Note I NO I 20 -lnst,. & Control Panels & FR-156 FR-156 RCP 23 & 24 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW YES NO Note 1 REMOVED I S/H 2 Cabines 20 -InstO & Control Panels & FR-157 FR-157 RCP 23 & 24 SEAL SEALOFF FLOW YES NO Note I REMOVED I TIH 2 -Cabin ts 20 -Inris. & Control Panelsb& FR-15t FR-159A RCP 21 & 22 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW YES NO Note I REMOVED I T/H 2 20 -Inst, & Control Panels &C n 2 2b- nlsO & eolPaes0 p-15o PR-t5TS RCP 218&22 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW YES NO Note I REMOVED I TIH Cabinets CntolPael lCabinets t e L112 Lt-112 VCT LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I B 20 -Inst2 .& Control PanelC &2-Cabinets LI-1128 LI-1128 CONE STORAGE TANK LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-26 of 42 o C EN 'SCREEN 4 Fle SafBy Fonedorn"Y ti:*:' .j~ ,bI E"* SEL ." ..... .:Inserts

-""-.' * !eHnt ".. ' ....c"o'oI.il?

R,14.r Rpiot' e. nve Coe too6 Caint LTCntt2 Control n 2 0 in I s t r. & C o nt ro l P a n e l s &2 Cabinets LI-112A LI-1128A CONS STORAGE TANK LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & LF1D L-1e SG 21 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Noe ESOI I Cabinets 2*Inr*&CnrlPnlCabints LI1427A LI-427A SG 22 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I YES I T/H 20 -lest,. & Control Panels &2 Cabinets L-427D LI-427D Sa 22 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/H 20 -Inst. & ControlPanetsaitLI-37A LI-alTA SOZI LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIR 2oCabinets L137A LI-437A SG 23 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Not. I YO I T/H 20 -Instr. & Control Panelsa&tLIA2TA LI -427A TOO' LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note t VET I VI H 2CCabinets L1437D LI-437D SG 23 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/H 20 -Is. & Control Panels, & 111279 LI4275 P SGR2 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I T/H 2PCabinets 20 -Inst,. N Control Panels,&sLI-470 LI&437A SC 23 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note t VE I YB 2CCabinets I-5 YES NO Not. 1 NO 2 20 -tensl. N Control Panels Ia Le5 LI-45T PRE4S70 S23 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Nato I NO I ETA 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels &Cabinets L1460 L1460 RESSER LEVEL RECATOR YES NO Note1 NO I 20 -Instn. & Control Panels N& 47 LI-317 0024RLEVRNEL INDICATIOR YES NO Note 1 VES I TI 2 Cabinets 20 -tnsSr & Control Panels &2 Cabinets L-470 1170 002 LEVEL INDICAtOR YES NO Note 1 No I SIR 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & LI-55 RESSUR LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 2 Cabinets 2 20 -lnst,. & Control Panels & LIAS LII-90 RSURIE LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 22 -Instr. & Control Panels & NI-S1 SOURCE RANGE INDICATION YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 Cabinels 2 20 -Insr. & Control Panels & NI-42 SOURCE RANGE INDICATION YES NO Note I NO I 2 Cabinets 20 -Insts. & Control Panels & NI-35 SOUR E RANGE INSICATION YES NO Note t NO I 2 Cabinets 2 20 -nInstr & Control Panelsab n t & C I 9 P -2 G # 2 S E M P E S C N R L E E ON t E 20 -est. & Control Panels A NIP-3 SOURCE RANGE INDICATION YES NO Note 1 No O 2 Cabinets 20 -Insnr. & Control Panels & NI-1S SOURCE RANGE INDICATION Noe Cn N1 YES NO Note I NO I 2 0 Cainost.&CnlP s&20 -lest,. & Controt Panels & 42I-1 SOURCE RANGE INDICATION YES NO Note I NO I 2 CabinetsINIAO 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & tI-N11 I-at1 SRCURIER RESS INDICATIO R YES NO Note I NO I 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & PN-t4192 P2-19241 CWTEA PRESS INDICATON R YES NO Noto I NO I I Cabinets 2 20 -loser. & Control Panels & I.B2 PU RSUIE ETRB CE R O 2YSN oeI N 2 CabinetsP49 P-2 G92SEMPESCNRLE E O Nt E 20 -Insta. & Control Panels & PCPs .PC-4lT SO R2t STEAM PRESS CONTROLLER YES NO Note I NO I 2 Cabinets 1 2 0 -lest,. Control Panels & PC-42R PC.420 00022 STEAM PRESS CONTROLLER YES NO Note I YES I 2 abinets I______20-ls, olo aes& PC-tOT PC-430 STION 02TAMRNCLR PRESS CONTROLLE R VET NO Note I YES I 2 20 -lnstr. A Control Panels S PC-11sR PC-119O 002 SERIEWTEAM ULARHAE PRESSUCNTOLE YES NO Note I VETI CabinetsINCAO 2 20 -lest,. tConnoolPentsA&

PI-t141R PI-1191R STCATIO AIR NPLRERPESS INDICATOR YES NO Netn 1 NO I 2 Cabtents 20 -lest, & Control Panels & PtOR p S NIAO 20 -lnlsnCotePats PI-ttg2R PI-1192R SVC WATER PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NOI 20 -ten- A Control Panelt A P -1 t2R P .1-t2R0 S C WATESCHR G P RESS IN ICATOR YES NONo I NO I 2 Cabinets IAN Nt Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-27 of 42 SCREEN S.-EEN"2.":5EE'.SCREEN.4 "Fl So...f.."unctlons

--.

• 7,E.-. '.C U .A i. E * -.'. " .. * .i ..c 49 w '; ...:: 20 T I t -ontrol Pattlso e 20Cabtests n~laes P1-1262 P1.1262 AHEW 22 DISCHARGE PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NOI 2 CabinetsINCAR 2 20, -fntest & Control Panels P1-1262 P1-1262 VCT2ISHAG PRESSUR INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 Cabinet 20 loont,. & Control Panels 6&O EE OOTE EDONPESYS N oeI N Cabinet P1 INICTO 2u 2onro co" no, oto aesSc=3 116VTPESR NDCTRYSN oe1 N 2 2 ni& -.PaesS PI- t2B1 PI- 14261 CG 22 DISCHARGE PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Not. I NO I Cabinets 20 -Instr & Cntrol Panels& P126 .t26 AO 23 SCHARGE RESS INDICATOR NO NO 2 20 -Inte & Connol Panels & Pt-AlA PI.419A S G 21 STEAM INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels & P 419B PI1.439B 521 STEAM INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 2 20 C inst & Contro Panels & PI-14C PI-419C 0G 21 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I_Cabinets 2 20 -Insr. & Control Panels & PI419A PI-421A SG 22 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Not. 1 NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Istr. & Control Panels & P14191 P19B 0022 STEAM INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO 2 20 -eIn.9 & Control Panalt & P1429C PI-429C SG 22 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 2 20 C Ines. & Control Panels & PI429A PI-429A SG 22 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels & P1-439B P1-439A SG 23 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Ins. & Control Panels & PI-439C P1.439C SG 23 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 2 120-lonst,.

& Control Panels & PI.49A PI.449A SG024 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Catinet 2 20 -Instr & Control Panels &Cabinets P,39C PI-439C SG 23 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES N Note I NO I 2 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels & PIA4.C PI-s9A SG 24 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Nose t NO I 2 Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & PIS49B P2.4B G STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -lnst,. & Control Panels & P1449C PI-49C SO 24 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instax & Contrl Panel A P"455 PI-455 PRESSURIZER PRIES INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels & P1.456 PI.956 PRESSURIZER PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 Y NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & PI.A72 PI-472 PRT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets ______ ______________________

2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & PI-5993 PI-5993 RHR PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I YES I Cabinets 2 20 -Insr. & Control Panels & PI-948C PI-948C CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels &2 2. les PI-9498 PI.9489 CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 2 20 -ceo., & Control Panels N Pt-948C P1.9499 CONTAtNMENT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 20 -lnst. & Control Panels & Pt-949A4 PI-949A CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabints 2 2D -Instr. & Conlrol Panels & Pl-949B PI-949S CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATO NR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 20 -instr. & Control Panels & A PESR INLCNETRCNIINR YS N o.I N 2 26 -Ines. & Control Panels & PM-40E6 PM-406BA PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note , NO I CabinPets 2 20 -1,ste. & Control Panels & PM-406C PM-406C PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Itstr. & Control Panels & PM-406D PM-406D PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Nose I NO Cabinets Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-28 of 42' SCREE~N Bi-SEEt42 S CfEEý,3 SCREEN4 FleSdetey Fonctions: :,0:v .:.... ..:'. .,, :at s.t! ... ..:Ut. ; .i. .:: -3" -l- tese.. s.t..T,. o.T554-.*.

N!4. 77 .:**.,: SM ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6ti B.Mic? .-tc..o<i*aot Rplcd RE' e-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t Apt ..-2H- Oolly esee eet Reef Cotaereo 4 *1 .'2 20 -Instr. Control Panels & TI-126 TI-126 CHG FLOW TO RCS TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO Cabinets 20 -lnstr. Control Panels & GNON REEN HX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 Cant TI -130 TI130 INDICATOR 2 20 -lost. & Control Panels & TI-411A TI411A RCS LOOP 21 DELTA T TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Noto I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & TI-412A RCS LOOP 21 OVEN TEMP DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -tenst,. & Control Panels & TI-4128 TI-45 ERCS LOOP 21 OVER TEMP DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Nete 1 NO I Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -lest, N Consol Panels & T-412C TI1412C RCS LOOP 21 Too9 TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & TI-421A T1421A RCS LOOP 22 DELTA 0 TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr & Control Panel, & T-22A TIs22A RCS LOOP 22 OVER T EMP DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Nete I NO Cabints INDICATOR YS N oeI N 20 -leste. A Control Panels & T.t2 I42 NIAO 2 20 -oist, & Control Pan & T"422C T1-422C RCS LOOP 24 Ta'vJ TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 2 Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & TI431A TI431A RCS LOOP 23 DELTA T TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 20- lnst,. & Control Panels & TA432A RCS LOOP 23 OVER TEMP DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Note I NO I 2 Cabineols TI-432A 51-432A INDICATOR 2 20- lest,. N Control Panels & TI-4320 T1432B OCT LOOP 23 OVER PWO DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -lostr & Control Panels & TI-432C T0432C RCS LOOP 23 TavU TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I-Cabinets 2 20 -InstO. & Conrol Panels & TI-441A TI-4rA RCS LOOP 24 DELTA T TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets C e RCS LOOP 24 OVER TEMP DELTA T SET POINT 20 -inal. & Control Panels & TI-42A TI-442A YES NO NotI I NO I 2 Cabinets INDICATOR i20 -.Ins. & Control Panls & RCS LOOP 24 OVR PWR DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Notes NO 2-Cbie nelts T-4028 Tts4428 INDICATOR 2 20 -lnst,. & Control Panels & TI-442C TI-442C RCS LOOP 22 Tavg TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr 0 Control Panels & TI-453 T1-453 PRESSURIZER LIQUID TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinels 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & TI-454 T01.45 PRESSURIZER STEAM TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels & T71 T1471 PRT TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -lest,. A Control Panels & TEMP CONTROLLER CONTAINMENT AVERAGE-Cabins. I TIC-1203 TIC-1203 TEMPYES NO Not I NO CabinetsLO 1&2 TEMP REODRYS N Nt.2- nt.&CnrlPe,&

TR1 TR3YSI 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & TR-r13 TR-433 LOOP 21 & 22 TEMP RECORDER YES NO Note i YES Cabinets 2 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels & TR-A23 TR-623 TEMPERATURE RECORDER YES NO Note I REMOVED Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & TR-33 TR-433 LOOP 220 &24 TEMP RECORDER YES NO Note I TED I Cabinets 2 20 -ensl,. & Control Panels & R-6030 TR-603 TEMP RECORDER YES NO Nate I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst,. & Control Panels & VO-1203 T-1203 CONTAINMENT Tavy1 TEMP TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 leIst,. 0 Conteol Panels 0 TT-l203A TT-12303 TOTALIZER VES NO Note I NOI Cabinets 2 20abinestes0CnrlPnl VOLTMETER BUD 2A,3A,5A.NAVOLTMETER YES NO Note t NO I 2 07 -Flud-OpnatedValves TCV 130 TCV-130 TEMPCONTROLVALVE YTS NO YES NO I 0 2 08B -Solnoid-Operated Valves EP-t EL. PNEUMATIC VALVE (CCRAC Damper A SOVI YES NO YES YES I I 0 0 B B YES 0 2 000.- Solenoid-Opnrated Talvoo ETYlD SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-29 of 42.-: .~~ .SCREEN ~SCREEN 2- SCEN3SREE!4Fe adFeten SpC I "4 Sy .-- 4--, Ig IICLASSY [Et ~ WEN ElulýIPENT, DscRPO 0- mr ,EGWnet.SSE W ...,- ,iP ,): ......-.:... .: -: ' hg iiael.ei ..v...vv .. v-v;:" ..D "* sy, Ii? '." ..; -.:-.. ..... .. .. .'& t o ... .. e.,.of .lvt.a E R ansa YES S 2 SOSB Solenoid.Operated Valves EV~l 1 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YESI YES X 2 555 Solenoid-Operated Valves EVYl2 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES I YES X 2 SSB Solenoid-Operated Valves EVI'14 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES I YES S 2 555 Solenoid-Operated Valves EVY1d SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES S 2 GAS -SOle nold-Opoemted Selves EtVO16 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES 2 555 -Solenoid-Operated Valves EOV-12A SOV1 SOLENOID VALVE (HLV12IneSO)YES NO YESO 2 SSB- Soleneid-Operaied Valve s SOV-1t2A SOV-1t2A SOLENOID VALVE (COLCV-112A Inlet SOV) YES NO NOS NOI 2 08B -Solenoid-Openated Valves SOV-tt20 SOV-1 25 SOLENOID VALVE CSO Lo CV-1104Ile

~) YES NO YES NOS I SX 2 0SS- Solnnoid-Openated Valveo SOV-1l7S SOY-1 170 SOLENOID VALVE (SOy tar TCV-ll05)

YES NO YES YES I S 2 08B- Solenoid.Operated Valves SOV-llP7 SOv-1171 SOLAFENCOIDRVALVE SOyLonECN-OID YES NO YES NO IX 2 0SSS- Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1177 SOy-1178 21 AFTERCOOLER INLET SOLENOID YES NO YES NO I SX* 0555- Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV.-1t74 50V-1175 22AFERCOOLERNLEE (1SGLENOIDtin YES NO YES NO I S 2 0DS- Soleneid-Operated Valves SOV-1314 SOV-l3t5 SOLENOID VALVE (21 SOBS Isolation)

YES NO YES NOS I 2 08B6- Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-t316 SOV-13t5 SOLENOID VALVE (22 5G55 IsolationI YES NO YES YES I S 2 CR5 -Sdlenoid-Operated Vetoes 500-1317 SOV-1315 SOLENOID VALVE (24 5055 Isoladon)

YES NO YES YES I S 2 08B5- Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1321 SOV-132t SOLENOID VALVE (21 AFWp Recite) YES NO YES NO I S 2 0SS5- Soloeoid-Oporatnd Valves SOV- 1323 SOV-1323 SOLENOID VALVE (23 AFWNP Revile) YES NO YES NO I S 2 0DS- Solenoid-Opeiated Valves SOV-1d25 SOV-1d28 SOLENOID VALVE IIA valve PCV. 1225) YES NO YES NO I S S S SX 2 05B5- Solenoid-Operated Valves SOy-I4R SOy-laY SOLENOID VALVE (Non-Regee 55 Outlell YES NO NO YES I 2 55 -Fees 21CPEF-SLWR 21CPEF CS PURGES& PAP ESH FAN YES NO YES NO I S S S 2 09 -Fans 2lCRDF 2lCRSF CONYROL ROD DRIVE VENT FAN 21 YES NO NO YES I 2 09 -Fans 2lETEF-SLWR 2lETEF EXHAUSTY FAN YES NO YES NO I S S S S S 2 59 -Fans 22CPEF-SLWR 22CPEF CS PURGE S PAP EXH FAN YES NO YES NO I 5 5 2 DR -Fees 22ETEF-BLWR 22ETEF EXHAUSTE FAN YES NO YES NO I S S S S S 2 D9 -Fans CPFSD CPFSD BYPASS DAMPER YES NO NO NO 2 09 -Fees CPFFS CPFFD FACE PAMPER YES NO NO NOI 2 SB -Fees WALL FAN 213 F-213 WALL FAN #213 YES NO YES NO I S S S S S 2 S9T-Fans WALL FAN 215 F-215 WALL FAN #215 YES NO YES NO I S S S S S 2 55 -Fans WALL FAN 21A F-21A WALL FAN 0216 YES NO YES NO I x S S S X09- Fans WALL FAN 31S F-315 EDOSBLOGFAN YES NO YESI NO I S S S S S EDG wall fans support feuictions but nor directly Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-30 of 42**:. :.:,.- ...: ...... -.. ,- ...... EEN,

.SCREEN, B Fie Ss .Erarr.B .. " :..... .... .- .... .............LASS EaPSEtr nEQWQPUE.f YEQUIJtUEANT OESCRIPTION u~~2'Evree~f-'SEL-E IV:-AS M E -MEN.0j: y... ----RG". .... .......:.,.,.n -...n..., -...,:, ._. ..-.: .-- .,. -: ... ...... .:.. : .... .ee efNet anuiree 2 09 -Fans WALL FAN 319 F-319 EDG BLDO FAN YES NO YES NO I x X X x X 2 09 -Fans WALL FAN 320 F-320 EDo BLDG FAN YES NO YES NO I X X x X X 2 9- Fans WALL FAN 321 F.321 EDO BLDG FAN YES NO YES NO I x X x X X 2 09 -Fans WALL FAN 322 F-322 EDG BLDG FAN YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 09 -Fans WALL FAN 323 F-323 EDG BLDG FAN YES NO YES NO I A A A X 2 10 -Air Handlers 11dPl-S024 11llP1-S024 FIRE DAMPER BANK YES NO NO NO I 2 10 -Air Handlers WALL FAN 318DMPR PREUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES, NO A A 0 A X 318-DM 2 10 Air HandlWALL FAN 319DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X X X A 2 10

• Air Handlers ____ 319-CM 2 10- A.r Handlers WALL FAN 320DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 320-CM 2 10 Air Handlers WALLFAN 321DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES NO I x A A X______________

321-DM 2 10 Air Handl WALL FAN 322DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X X X x X 2___ 10- AiHand __e322-DM 2 10 AirHandlers WALL FAN 323DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X x x X X 2 10 -Air Handlers _ 323-CM 2 10 -Air Handlers CCRHI CCR-Hi DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X X X X x 2 10 -Air Handlers CCRH2 CCR-H2 CAMPER YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 10 -Air Handlers CCRJ1 CCR-J I DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X X X x x 2 10 -Air Handlers CCRJ2 CCR-J2 DAMPER YES NO YES NO I x X X X X 2 10 -Air Handlers FD-21 F0213 AUTOMATIC SHUTTER 213 YES NO YES YES I X x X X X 2 10 -Air Handlers FD-16 FD215 AUTOMATIC SHUTTER 215 YES NO YES YES I X X x x X 2 10 -Air Handlnrs FD-12 FD216 AUTOMATIC SHUTTER 216 YES NO YES YES I X X X X X 2 10 -Air Handlers IP1-S009 FIRE DAMPER BANK YES NO NO YES I 2 10 -Air Handler L-21 L-21 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bldg) YES NO YES NO I A A A A A 2 10 -Air Handler L-214 COMB LOUVERYNTAI(E RLF DAMPER YES NO NO 'fES I 2 10 -Apr Handlers L-22 L-22 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bldg) YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 10 -Air Handlrs L-23 L-23 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bldg) YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 10 -Air Handlers L-24 L-24 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bldg) YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 10 -Air Handlers L-25 L-25 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bldg) YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 14 -Distrib ution Panels OP-1 PNL EPA77 EDO VENT DISTRIBUTION PANEL 1 YES NO YES NO I X x X X X 2 14 -Estedbutin Panels DP-2 PNL EPA78 EDG VENT DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2 YES NO YES NO I X X X x X 2 14 -Dstnbution Panels CVDP21 PNL EPZ28 CCR VENT DISTRIBUTION PANEL 21 YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 1 -Dis tdbution Panels PNL EPZ29 CCR VENT DISTRIBUTION PANEL 22 YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 14 -Disldtrabian Panels PNL JCl FAN ROOM CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 20 -Inslr. A Caniral Panels A IP2-OB D9;RACK LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I A 2 Ca/Imnels CR RACK DR Same as EDG wall fans Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-31 of 42 S- SCREE N; SC. N 3 SCRENf 4 Fn., Safety.Funct

...Siii~~~jE!ýjo"Cbss

~ ~ ~ ~ 1nAEN .IyrMNVSRPI0 SCREENm--

2 mmt........"85 5 L ... .-:,.. ,.r.nY.n.

... .E*

• E, wnt?. ..' .... .. .. .. 0 4tw.::..* * .............

... ........ , :... ,oe--'gul-*--'Y¶

i 2 2 nt.&Cnp er Control Conel Corl R 2 20 nsa A Contro Panels & EPF7 SOV CONTROL PANEL A (IVSWS Valves) YES NO NO NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst, & Cotro] Panels &2 Cabinets EPF8 SOV CONTROL PANEL 8 IIVSWS Valoes) YES NO NO NO 1 2 20 -Inst, & Control Panels & Il-PBUt PBUI PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP 21 YES NO YES NO I Cabinets 2 20 eisrt & Control Panels A II-PBU3 PSU3 PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP 23 YES NO YES NO I Cabinets 20 l esS. & Control Panels & PNL*RPC AIR RECEIVER I VENT PNEUMATIC CONTROL YES NO NO NO I 2 Cabinets L AT PANEL 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & PNL GAS GAS ANALYZING PANEL YES NO NO NO Cabinets ANALZ 2 20 .-Intr. & Control Panels & IP2-CB-53.

25Cabints 2CCR AAS PNL PNL A#2 ASSESSMENT PANEL 02 YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 20 -Inste E Control Panels A IP2-CB 2nCCR AAS PNL PNL A#3 ASSESSMENT PANEL *3 YES NO YES NO I X X X X X Cabinets 3 20 -Instr & Control Panels & PNL EPHR SAMPLING SYSTEM CONTROL PANEL S1 YES NO NO NO I 2 Cabinets 2 20 st, & Control Pane~ls & N 2 sCabinles PNL EPI SAMPLING SYSTEM CONTROL PANEL R2 YES NO NO NO 2 20 -Intr & Control Panels & NO 2C.binets RACK BRLYOX FAN ROOM RELAY SO9 YES NO NO 1 2 20 -Instr. & C-t1 Panels & NO 2 Cabinets RACK BOX S92 RACK BOX S92 YES NO NO 1 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & NO 2 CabinelsRAKBX$3 RC O$9 S NONI 20 -Instt. A Control Panels A NO 2 Cabinets RACK BOX S94 RACK BOX S94 YES NO NO I 2 20 -&nsle. A Control Panels & NO Cabinets RACK BOX S95 RACK BOX S9S YES NO NO 1 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangets 21SWHX SS21SWHX SEALWATER HEAT EXCH NO. 21 YES NO NO NO I 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 0021XXD 21 INSTR AIR DRYER SKID YES NO YES YES I x X X X X 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22CWHX 0022CWHX 22 VA CMPR CL COOLING WATER HX YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Eashangee 00221AXXF 22 INST AIR PREFLTRIAFTERFLTR SKID YES NO YES YES I x X X X X 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exohangees 22PLHX D022PLHX PRESSURIZER LIQUID SAMPLER HX 22 YES NO NO NO I a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22PLHX 0022PLHX PRESSURIZER LIQUID SAMPLER HX 22 YES NO NO NO I B YES 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Eahanger 21AT 21SISACC 21 S0S ACCUMULATOR YES NO NO I T.B B x x YES 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Enchangero 22AT 22SISACC 22 SIS ACCUMULATOR YES NO NO I T.8 ,ans 2 21 -Tanks and Heal TEhbngers 22RCHX 0022RCHX 22 RC SAMPLE HX YES NO NO NO I S 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangens 0022XXD 22 INSTR AIR DRYER SKID YES NO YES YES I 5 0 S 5 0 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Eabhangen 21CWHX 21CWHX 21 I/A CMPR CL COOLING WATER HX YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 21 -Tanks and Heal Enchaegers 211ACA 21 lACA INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 21 YES NO YES NO I X X X X X AFTERCOOLER 2 21 Tanks and Heat Eschangers 21IAR 21tAR INSTRUMENT AIR RECEIVER YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Eoehangens 211AXXF 21 INST AIR PREFILTERJAFTERFILTER SKID YES NO YES YES I X X X X X 2 21

• Tanks and Heat Ebchangers 21PLHX 21PLHX PRESSURIZER LIQUID SAMPLER HX 21 YES NO NO NO I S Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-32 of 42 SCREEN.S* SRIEEN12 SEN 3 SRE4'. FH.~saley unellon..-...."" ... .* ." ". ....*.*.".. ..........R E E N ""~YN Nr I l V t H~Edp.t i6:s 0; ,)E. _ .',y j ... le Het * -.* *" ". ." ..2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21PRT 21PRT PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK YES NO NO NO I TIH B 2 21 -Tanksand Heat Exchangers 21PSHX 21PSHX PRESSURIZER STEAM SAMPLE HX 21 YES NO NO NO I 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Echangers A21RHX 21RCIHX 21 REACTOR COOLANT SAMPLE HX YES NO NO NO I B 2 21 -Tanks and Heal Enchanges IACCET IACCET EXPANSION TANK YES NO YES NO I x x x x x NOTE 1: These components are included with components previously identified under equipment classes 18 and 20.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-33 of 42 Table 2 SWELl List SWEL# EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN SYSTEM CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING ID TYPE SWELl-001 0022SWPS NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP SWSTR PIT 5-9' N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 0 0, H N SEE SWEL SHEET AUTOMATIC STRAINER SWELl-002 0024SWPS NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP SWSTR PIT 5-9" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 0 0, H N SEE SWEL SHEET AUTOMATIC STRAINER SWEL1-003 22AT 22 SIS ACCUMULATOR VC 46'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-004 MS-47A MS-47A AFB 77'-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 0 I, T N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-005 PCV-1276 N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 0 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-006 MCC-26A 480 VAC MCC PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-007 MCC-26AA 480 VAC MCC PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-008 MCC-26B 480 VAC MCC PAB 981-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-009 MCC-26BB 480 VAC MCC PAB 981-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-010 MCC-27A 480 VAC MCC PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-011 MCC-29 480 VAC MCC CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-012 MCC-26C 480 VAC MCC CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-013 BUS 5A 480V BUS 5A CB 151-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 2 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-014 BUS 6A 480V BUS 6A CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 2 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-015 52/RTA REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 2 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-016 SST5 STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A CB 151-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 4 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-017 BB8 PRESSURIZER HEATER CB 15-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 4 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET TRANSFORMER SWELl-018 BC2 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 4 I N SEE SWEL SHEET PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP Not Listed SWELl-019 6B9 CR 15R-0" NA. Not Listed 4I Y SEE SWEL SHEET________GROUP

1. 22 TRANSFORMER Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-34 of 42 EQUIPMENID SYSTEMDRWN SWEL# EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN TYPE CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING SWELl-020 0021SIP SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 PAB 59'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 t Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-021 21AFP AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-022 0022AFP AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-023 0023CCP CCW PUMP NO. 23 PAB 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-024 21CLWP 21 I/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PUMP CB 15-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-025 21BATP BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 PAB 80'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 1 N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-026 0023CHP NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP PAB 80'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-027 21CSP CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 PAB 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-028 21RHRP RHR PUMP NO. 21 PAB 151-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-029 0022RHRP RHR PUMP NO. 22 PAB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-030 0022SWP 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP INTAKE 151-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 0, H Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-031 0026SWP 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP INTAKE 151-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 0, H Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-032 0023FOTP FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 FOST 77'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 0. H N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-033 22RP 22 RECIRC PUMP VC 46'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-034 PCV-1310A AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB AFB 43'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 7 I N SEE SWEL SHEET STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE SWELl-035 AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB AFB 32'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 7 1 N SEE SWEL SHEET PCV-1310B STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE SWEL1-036 JACKET WATER COOLER RETURN EDG 67'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 7 I N SEE SWEL SHEET FCV-1176 FLOW CONTROL VALVE SWELl-037 JACKET WATER COOLER RETURN EDG 6T-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 7 I N SEE SWEL SHEET FCV-1176A FLOW CONTROL VALVE SWELl-038 250A 21 RCP SEAL INJECTION LINE PPEN & MEZZ 51-0 & 67'- N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I N SEE SWEL SHEET S ISOLATION VALVE 6" 1 8T --

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-35 of 42 SWEL# EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN SYSTEM CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING ID TYPE SWELI-039 SWN-51-1A 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE MEZZ 67'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 1 N SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL-040 1870 MIN FLOW TEST LNE PPEN & MEZZ 51-0" & 67- N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWL-00180VALVE 6" SWE~-041492824 RCP SEAL INJECTION LINE SWELl-041 4928 PPEN 51'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 1 N SEE SWEL SHEET ISOLATION VALVE SWELl-042 HCV-142 BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS PPEN 51'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I N SEE SWEL SHEET VALVE SWELI-043 SOV-1230 SG 21 MSIV SOV AFB 77'-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-044 SOV-1231 SG 21 MSIV SOV AFB 77'-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-045 SOV-1232 SG 21 MSIV SOV AFB 77'-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 1 Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-046 SOV-1233 SG 21 MSIV SOV AFB 77'-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-047 F-318 EDG BUILDING FAN EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-048 22CPEF CB PURGE AND PAB EXHAUST FAN FAN HOUSE 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-049 21CPEF CB PURGE AND& PAB EXHAUST FAN FAN HOUSE 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-050 21ETEF EXHAUST FAN ELE TUNNEL 73'-7" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-051.

F-216 WALL FAN #216 CB 15-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-052 21CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 21 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-053 0022CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 22 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-054 0023CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 23 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-055 0024CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 24 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-056 0025CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 25 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-057 CCRAC2 CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS) TSC 88'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 11 I N SEE SWEL SHEET Engineering Report No.IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-36 of 42 SWEL# ~~~~~~SYSTEM EVRNETACO RWN EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN TE CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING ID TYPE SWELl-058 211AC INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 21 CB 15-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 12 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-059 00221AC INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 22 CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 12 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-060 22EDAC STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 22 EDG 62'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 12 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-061 21MGS 21 MACHINE GENERATOR SET CB 33*-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 13 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-062 22MGS 22 MACHINE GENERATOR SET CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 13 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-063 IBUS21 118 VAC INSTRUMENT BUS 21 CB 53'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-064 DPNL22 125 VDC DISTRIBUTION PNL 22 PC4 CB 53'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-065 EDD1 TRANSFER SWITCH CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-066 EDD2 TRANSFER SWITCH CB 151-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-067 EDC1 STATIC INVERTER #23 MANUAL BY- CB 33'.0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 I N SEE SWEL SHEET PASS SWITCH SWELl-068 BATT21 BATTERY BANK CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 15 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-069 BATT22 BATTERY BANK CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 15 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-070 BATT23 BATTERY BANK CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 15 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-071 BATT24 BATTERY BANK CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 15 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-072 MI9 BATTERY CHARGER 21 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 16 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-073 EGA3 BATTERY CHARGER 24 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 16 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-074 EGAl 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #21 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 16 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-075 EGA8 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #23 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 16 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-076 21EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 17 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-37 of 42 SWEL# EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN SYSTEM CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING ID TYPE SWELl-077 0022EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 17 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-078 0023EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 17 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-079 INST RK5 INSTRUMENT RACK 5 AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-080 PCV-1139 AUXILIARY FWP TURBINE SUPP PRESS AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I N SEE SWEL SHEET REDUCING VALVE SWEL1-081 EDG BLDG 72' ELEVATION ENGINE EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I N SEE SWEL SHEET IP2-EDGB-72-DB6 AUXILIARIES CONTROL PANEL SWELl-082 INST RK 19 INSTRUMENT RACK 19 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEIL1-083 INST RK 21 INSTRUMENT RACK 21 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWFL1-084 ELJ-10 EDG BUILDING THERMOSTAT EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 19 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWFIL1-085 TE-130 NON REGEN OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 19 I N SEE SWEL SHEET ELEMENT SWEL1-086 TE-122 EXCESS LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT VCI 46-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 19 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-087 PNL PP9 EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWF-L1-088 EPK1 SW PUMP #21 STRAINER CONT PNL SWSTR PIT 5-9" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 0 N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-089 EPG9 REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 I N SEE SWEL SHEET CABINET, BUS 6A SWeLl-090 22SIP 22 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PAB 59'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-091 PNL EPA10 PAB EXCHANGER

& CB PRG FAN 21 FAN HOUSE 80'-0 N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 I N SEE SWEL SHEET CONTROL PANEL SWELl-092 21CCST 21 COMPONENT COOLING SURGE PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET TANK SWEELl-093 22BAT BORIC ACID TANK PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWeL1-094 0021RWST 21 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK NTF 82'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 0 Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELL1-095 CST CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK YARD 80'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 0 Y SEE SWEL SHEET Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-38 of 42 SWEL# EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN SYSTEM CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING ID TYPE SWELl-096 21FODT FUEL OIL DAY TANK NO. 21 EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-097 21NRHX NON REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21 PAB 98,-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-098 21CCHX CCW HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21 PAB 80' to 98' N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-099 00221ACA INST ATR COMPRESSOR 22 CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I N SEE SWEL SHEET I AFTERCOOLER SWELl-100 0022EDSAT STARTING AIR TANK 22DG EDG 67'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-101 21AT 21 SIS ACCUMULATOR VC 46'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET Key to Environment Code O = outdoors H = high humidity T = high temperature I = indoors B = Boron Key to Building Code EDG = Emergency Diesel Generator VC = Vapor Containment PAB = Primary Auxiliary Building AFB = Auxiliary Feed Pump Building CB = Control Building PPEN = Pipe Penetration FOST = Fuel Oil Storage Tank SWSTR PIT = Service Water Strainer Pit INTAKE = Intake Structure TSC = Technical Support Center ELE TUNNEL = Electrical Tunnel MEZZ = Mezzanine Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-39 of 42 Table 3 SWEL2 Base List"-' ZD DESCIPTION.

BL-DG. ELEV. ROOM SYSTEM TYPE CLASS ENVIRONMENT NIR 2-2-1 21RWPP Refueling Water Purification Pump 21 and Motor PAB 68 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 lB Listed 2-2-2 21SFPP Spent Fuel Pit Pump 21 and Motor FSB 70 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 IB Listed 2-2-3 22SFPP Spent Fuel Pit Pump 22 and Motor FSB 70 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 IB Listed 2-2-4 21SFPHX Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger FSB 80 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 21 IB Listed 2-2-5 21SFSP Spent Fuel Pool Skimmer Pump 21 FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BIL 2 5 I Listed 2-2-6 SFPD Spent Fuel Pit Oemineralizer 21 PAS 59 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 21 IB Listed 2-2-7 SFPF Spent Fuel Pit Filter 21 PAS 80 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 0 lB Listed 2-2-8 SFPBH Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BIL 2 0 I Listed 2-2-9 40TFSBH Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BIL 2 0 I Listed 2-2-10 11OTFSB Ederer Crane (Dry Fuel Storage) FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 0 I_Listed Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-40 of 42 Table 4 SWEL2 Rapid Draw-Down List R-2-01 R-2-02 R-2-03 DESqRITI.iON Fuel Transfer Tube Blind Flange (IP2)Fuel Transfer Canal Weir Gate (IP2)Abandoned 4" Pipe Penetration (IP2)BASIS,,FOR IN.CLUSION/EXCLUSION Excluded.

Routinely disassembled, inspected and reassembled every refueling.

Additionally, excluded per FAQ 3.17.Excluded.

Routinely inspected every refueling.

Additionally, excluded per FAQ 3.16.Excluded.

Not accessible (in Spent Fuel Pool). Additionally, in category of "piping".

not equipment or component.

RDD Y Y Y Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-41 of 42 Table 5 WEL2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List ,SEV, -EQCURIMENIrD DOESRIF 1ON BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN SYSTEM TYPE CLASS ENVIRONMENT N/R RDD SWEL2-2-001 21RWPP Refueling Water Purification Pump 21 and Motor PAB 68 Not Listed Not NIA to BL 2 5 IB NIA Listed SWEL2-2-502 21SFPP Spent Fuel Pit Pump 21 and Motor FSB 70 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 lB N/A Listed SWEL2-2-O03 22SFPP Spent Fuel Pit Pump 22 and Motor FSB 70 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 IB N/A Listed SWEL2-2-004 21SFPHX Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger FSB 80 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 21 IB N/A Listed SWEL2-2-005 SFPBH Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 0 I N/A Listed SWEL2-2-006 40TFSBH Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane FSB 95 Not Listed Not NIA to BL 2 0 I NIA Listed SWEL2-2-O07 11OTFSB Ederer Crane (Dry Fuel Storage) FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 0 I N/A Listed Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-42 of 42~JA\CY ~~A (2I&i~A~~ 2.Seismic Walkdown Equipment List Approval-/ 5 Date: Equipment Selection Personnel Prepared by: 1/ ~-T;, e u/c ~/2-Reviewed by: Concurrence by;Operations Personnel Date: , /o 2-Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. 0 Page C-I of 434 ATTACHMENT C -SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCs)

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-2 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YN NI-- UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. O022SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5'-9" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Found mild surface corrosion.

Acceptable, not a seismic issue.Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.YZ NEI UD- N/AD YN NEI uDl N/A[D YN NEI UD- N/AD1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-3 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. O022SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YDI NEI U-- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDi UD--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE NEJ UI- N/AD--Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UD- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UD- N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ N[D UD--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-4 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NFD UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. O022SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[il UIEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 503080 Rev 0, Intake structure Zurn strainer # 22 thru # 26 piping arrangement sections.A-208111, Rev 19, Piping arrangement of automatic strainers in service water system intake structure.

AWC-013ý&ý Y-ýýEvahlatedl b : Kirit Parikh Date: 10/23/2012 qlk4g 044<7ý, Nirk CriLqnefl 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-5 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NI-- UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. O022SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Photographs Note: Front view of the service water pump automatic strainer.Note: Side view o automatic strainer EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-6 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE No UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. O022SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Note: Side view of the service water pump strainer Note: Base plate view of the service water pump strainer support.EN-DC-168 REV 0 I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-7 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 1 of 5 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YZ NI D UiD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-002 Equipment ID No. O024SWPS Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5"-9" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Found mild surface corrosion.

Acceptable not a seismic issue.Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Y[ NEI UD- N/AD YN NEI UiD N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NDI U[ N/AD Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipnient class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-8 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-002 Equipment ID No. O024SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NDi U[:] N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[E NDI ui potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NDi UEi N/AD-]Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Strainer is very close (about W") to Unistrut channel. Acceptable since it is well secured and target is a hard target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDi UD1 N/AD: and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexdbility to avoid damage? YO NDi uD- N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y] NDI UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-9 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NDI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl--002 Equipment ID No. O024SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

(Drawings and AWC)503060 Rev 0, Intake structure Zurn strainer # 22 thru # 26 piping arrangement sections.A 208111, Rev 19, Piping arrangement of automatic strainers in service water system intale structure, AWC-013 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/23/2012 qlAý(49 Nirk Cri.qnefl 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-10 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NF UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-002 Equipment ID No. O024SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Photographs Note: Side view of the service water pump automatic strainer Note: Front view of the service water pump automatic strainer EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-11 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NR Uoi-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-002 Equipment ID No. O024SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Note: Base plate view of the service water pump Note: Base plate view of the service water pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-12 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-004 Equipment ID No. MS-47A Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description MS-47A Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 77'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YDi NE YEI Nr- uDl N/AZ Not applicable since this is an in-line component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YDI NEI uD] N/A[Not applicable since this is an in-line component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Not applicable since this is an in-line component.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y0 NDI UDI N/AZ EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-13 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND I UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-004 Equipment ID No. MS-47A Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description MS-47A 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NDI U-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDi UDI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN NDI UD1 N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDJ UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN ND] uD- N/AD--Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-14 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NiW UW--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-004 Equipment ID No. MS-47A Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description MS-47A Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NWI UI-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 1. SQUG MS-45A 2. DWG 9321-F-2137, Rev 7, Turbune Building, Heated Bay & Yard area, Safety Valve Draingage Piping.3. AWC-036)qýEvaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/25/2012 Date: 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-15 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ Nr- UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-004 Equipment ID No. MS-47A Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description MS-47A Photographs Note: Note: o ag uiose up view EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-16 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: YE N-I UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE ND YZ ND UIE] N/AD YE NEI U-I N/AE-YN ND u-i N/AD Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-17 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND Ui-JI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NDI UI- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant documentation.

Drawing: 9321-LL-1 1196 Rev 1 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent light bulbs need to be secured by wires to the light fixture for good practice.

This is a house keeping issue it is judged the bulbs will not affect this SWEL component.

CR IP2-2012-06483 has been written to resolve this condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YE NDI UED N/AD1 Y[ ND I UD] N/ADl YE ND IuDl N/AD Y~NDN:1u[D EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-18 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE N-- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y-I NZ U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Loose tool is found in the area and needs to be removed. During a seismic event the tool will swing and strike nearby valves/equipment.

See Picture. CR IP2-2012-06483 has been written to remedy this condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC 1. SQUG PVC-1276 2. DWG A240155, Rev 4, Auxiliary Boiler Feed Pump Room Instrument Air/Nitrogen Back-up System Piping Arrangement Plan and Details 3. DWG 9321-F-7053, Rev 38, AB Feed Pump Room Instrument Piping -Sheet 2, Instrumentation

4. DWG 9321-F-1208, Rev 8, Shield WallArea, Concrete Plan El. 18'-6" 5. AWC-035 ,Aýq-Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/25/2012 Date: 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-19 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ ND-- UO1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES Photographs Note: PCV-12 Valve Note: Close up view of its support.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-20 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES IP2 Status: YZ N-- UD-j Equip. Class 1 0 Note: Loose tool is found in the area and needs to be removed.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-21 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE] NEI- UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-006 Equipment ID No. MCC-26A Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NEI The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is internal to cabinet and can not be inspected at current time. Cabinet should be powered down and opened for inspection.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Anchorage is internal to cabinet and can not be inspected at current time. Cabinet should be opened for inspection.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant cracks external to cabinet. Internaly should be inspected.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE] NEI UE N/AE]YD NEI U0 N/AEII YE NE]I U[I N/A[]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-22 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YO NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-006 Equipment ID No. MCC-26A Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEl NEI UEE N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing 932 1-LL- 11049 sht.4 Rev 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NDI UM potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See comments in line 2 and 3 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE ND u- N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[-] NE UD N/AU: and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs need wire securing bulb to fixture. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to resolve.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YN NO U[ N/AU 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free NED UFI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-23 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y-I NI- UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-006 Equipment ID No. MCC-26A Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D N[i- UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cover screws on divider between MCC cubicals 3D & 4D not secured. Judged not to be seismic concern. CR IP2-2012-06605 issued to resolve.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-LL-1 1049 sht.4 Rev 1 Auxiliary control panels for DG 31,32,33, Auxiliary control panels P7A.9321-F-1 1051 Rev 1 Auxiliary control panel P7A AWC-023 qlhý4g Evaluated by: -Nick Crispell Date: 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-24 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YO-- NIO] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-006 Equipment ID No. MCC-26A Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs No photos Note: No photos possible due to proceduraly required camera standoff distance.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-25 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE-- ND-- Ul Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-007 Equipment ID No. MCC-26AA Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area MCC Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YIE N-The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinet cubicals should be opened but are not allowed to be opened at power.External anchroage at top to unistrut and exterior weld at bottom checked and found to be free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware for exterior visible anchorage.

Interior could not be examined.

MCC needs to be opened and internals inspected.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YOI NEI UE N/A[D YE] NO] UZ N/A[L Y[] NE] UN N/A[L Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors when inspected externally.

Interior can not be examined until MCC is opened and internaly inspected.

Enter the equipment class name frorn EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-26 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl -007 Equipment ID No. MCC-26AA Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI U[ N/AFl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

External stitch weld at bottom and anchorage with unistruts at top matches SQUG (SEWS). Internals could not be examined.Reference Dwg: 9321-F-20063-28 (A201805)

Rev-28, 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y-I NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above external only inspection anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions as inspected externally.

Interior could not be examined.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NE] U0- N/AI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI- NEE U-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Florescent light with no safety wire is contrary to good seismic practice and must be secured to fixture. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NDI UI- N/All Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y-I NO U[I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Florescent bulbs can fall and impact MCC.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-27 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YO-- NO UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-007 Equipment ID No. MCC-26AA Equip. Class' I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings: 9321-F-20063(A201805), Rev-28, Turbine building and heater bay general arrangement ground floor plan at elev 15'.9321-F-10323(A201331), Rev 5, Turbine building concrete plan at elev. 15' S.E portion.AWC-024 6 Ak 1~, GX&~, Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-28 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI- NEIl U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-007 Equipment ID No. MCC-26AA Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-29 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE NE] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-008 Equipment ID No. MCC-26B Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NE]The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?MCC can not be opened at current time but should be. Anchorage not visible from outside. MCC is to be powered down and opened when possible.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YEI NE] LIED NIAE1 Y[-- NE-- ULE N/AO Anchorage not visible from outside.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE] NEI UE N/A]No cracks of significance outside of MCC. Internal anchorage is not visible from outside.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-30 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YE-- NE]I U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-008 Equipment ID No. MCC-26B Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-I NRl U[ N/Ar](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Internal anchorage is not visible from outside.Reference Drawing: 9321-F-2510-49 (A200627), Rev 49 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[-- NEl U[potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Internal anchorage is not visible from outside.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YO NE] U[-] N/A[:]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[-] NZ U[-] N/A[l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs need wire restraints securing bulb to fixture. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ N[-] UEl N/A[l Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[-] NI ULI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Unsecured fluorescent bulbs could fall on MCC.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-31 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: Yr- NEI uI[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-008 Equipment ID No. MCC-26B Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[i U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Loose cover screw on MCC cubical 6D & 6H. Missing cover screw on Aux. Component Pump cubical 5KR, and on one bottom cover plate. MCC judged seismicly acceptable given location and quantity of remaining screws. CR IP2-2012-06605 issued to track repair of screws.

References:

Drawings and A WC Dwg DMD 311678-AA, 9321-F-2510(A200627), Rev 49 Primary Auxiliary building general arrangement plans.AWC-023 q1110 CX~u Evaluated bv: Nick Crisdell Date: 10-22-2012

-:ýWse ý- V)t,ýLt Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-32 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI- NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-008 Equipment ID No. MCC-26B Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: MCC-26B. Not other pictures allowed while meeting the proceduraly required 6' stand off distance.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-33 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE] NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-009 Equipment ID No. MCC-26BB Equip. Class' I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area MCC Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?N[]The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?External anchorage checked and found to be acceptable.

Cubicals are to be opened and anchorage of internal components checked.Cubicals are not allowed to be openned when cubicals are powered.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes for external anchorage.

Internals to be examined after opening the cabinet.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YEI NEI U2 N/AE]YE] NE-] U2 N/AO YE] NE] U2 N/AL]No significant cracks external to cabinet. Internals to be examined.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-34 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YO NE- UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-009 Equipment ID No. MCC-26BB Equip, Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YED NDi U0-I N/AEij (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches SQUG (SEWS) for external anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE-- NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Internals to be examined at a latter time. Externals are acceptable.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE N[-] U[- N/A[D 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y11 NEI U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent light with no safety wire is contrary to good seismic practice and must be secured to fixture. Bulbs are not over top of MCC and therefore MCC is acceptable seismicly.

CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YE N[-] U[-] N/A[10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-35 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Yr-] NE] U[Z Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-009 Equipment ID No. MCC-26BB Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[Il U-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC.Drawings:

9321-F-70693 Rev, 2 Primary Auxiliary building general arrangement plan at elev. 55'instrumentation.

9321-F-25153(A202087), Rev 22, Primary Auxiliary building general arrangement plan at elev. 55'& 73'.SK-020 Rev 0 sht. 1 & 2, MCC-36B PAB elev. 55'.A208570, Rev 4, Equipment arrangement for post accident remote valve control sampling selection center.A200250 A WC-024 qv(ýg 0464ý,,ýEvaluated hv: Nick Crisoell Date: 10/22/2012 V: ý ý-0)tdýDan Nuts 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-36 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI- NEI UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-009 Equipment ID No. MCC-26BB Equip. Class' 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: North half of MCC room. Other photos not allowed due to proceduraly required camera standoff requirements.

Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-37 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Yr-O NEl-I U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-010 Equipment ID No. MCC-27A Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NEI The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is internal to MCC and is not visible from the exterior.Cubicals are to be opened but are not allowed to be opened when cubical is powered. MCC to be powered down and MCC opened for inspection.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Anchorage is internal to MCC & is not visible from the exterior.

Cubicals are to be opened but are not allowed to be at the current time.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YLI NE] uEE N/AE]YEI NEI UI N/AEl YE] NE] UN N/AE]No cracks of significance external to MCC. Need to examine internaly.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-38 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YEI NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-010 Equipment ID No. MCC-27A Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NFI- U[] N/Al](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference SQUG (SEWS) for anchorage details. MCC needs to be opened to see anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YlI NEI U]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

MCC needs to be opened.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y] NF] UE[ N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS Nil] UI-] N/All]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UrL N/Al]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEIl U[-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-39 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YE-- NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-010 Equipment ID No. MCC-27A Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D N[l UIL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I of 6 cover screws loose on north power panel. Judged not to be a seismic concern.CR IP2-2012-06605 issued to track resolution.

References:

Drawings and AWC.Drawings:

9321-F-2510(A200627), Primary Auxiliary building general arrangement plans.AWC-023 qlvo Ir OY4ýEvaluated kI .IAlil,L, ("r'ion.1l

~'3.-..Date: 10-22-2012 j -V~N~Dlan Niita 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-40 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YF- NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-010 Equipment ID No. MCC-27A Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-41 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YEl- NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-011 Equipment ID No. MCC-29 Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[E Ni-]Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Internal anchorage not visible from outside. Cabinet shall be opened when MCC is powered down to inspect internal concrete anchorage and anchorage of internal components to the cabinet.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Cannot be determined since anchorage is internal to cabinet and door could not be opened.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE] NEI U[ N/AL]-YE] NEI UN N/A["]YE N[:] U[- N/AL]Floor coated. No noticable cracks of significance.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-42 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI- NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-011 Equipment ID No. MCC-29 E(Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Cannot be determined since anchorage is internal to cabinet and door could not be opened. Anchorage to be per SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Cannot be determined since anchorage is internal to cabinet and door could not be opened.quip. Class 1 1 Y[:I NEI UE N/A[l YEINEIuZ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ N[D urEI N/A[-D 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UI- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall is seismiclly qualified by Computech report No. R547.01.Floresent bulbs need to be secured to the fixture with wires. CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie florescent bulb to fixture. It is judged the hard target MCC will remain operable if the florescent bulbs were to fall on it.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UD- N/AD--Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDl uil of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-43 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YO NO] UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-)11 Equipment ID No. MCC-29 Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE ND- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC.Drawings: A206640, Rev. 10, Arrangement of equipment in Cable Spreading room elev. 33'-0" west half plan &sects SQUG (SEWS)A WC-004 6 Ak~ 626&au Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/11/2012 Steohen Yuan 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-44 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI NEI U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-11 Equipment ID No. MCC-29 Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-45 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 1 of 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YD- NO UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-012 Equipment ID No. MCC-26C Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YU NDI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage internal to cabinet. Plant operations not allowed to open cubicals when powered. MCC is to be powered down and internal anchorage and anchorage of internal components inspected.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

See answer to question 2.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?See answer to question 2.YE] ND- UN N/AD YE] N[D1 UE] N/AED YD- NDI UE N/AD I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-46 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y-I NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-012 Equipment ID No. MCC-26C E(Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Cannot be determined since anchorage is internal to cabinet and door could not be opened. Anchorage to be per SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

MCC needs to be opened.quip. Class 1 1 YrI NEI U[A N/A[L YEll N[: UE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NE] UE] N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NO U- and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall qualified by computech report no. R54 7.01.Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinets will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie florescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YE NEI UD- N/AL EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-47 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YEr- NO Uj Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-012 Equipment ID No. MCC-26C Equip. Class' I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE] UF-i of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEl U[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Spare MCC26X-4H cubical missing 1 of 2 lock latches. MCC judged seismicly acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06509 issued to track resolution.

References:

Drawings and A WC A206640, Rev. 10, Arrangement of equipment in Cable Spreading room elev. 33'-0" west half plan &sects SQUG (SEWS)A WC-004 SýA %-Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10-11-2012 6 Ak~ §/Cjj, Nick Crispell 10-11-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-48 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Yr-l N-- UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-012 Equipment ID No. MCC-26C Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-49 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND-J UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-013 Equipment ID No. BUS 5A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 5A Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE-- NE The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cubicle doors were opened. Internals were examined and judged to be anchored adequately.

Visible floor anchorage acceptable.

It was noted most breakers did not have a lower left bolt and/or smaller bottom bolts connecting the breaker to the back of the cubicle. Missing bolts where judged acceptable given weight of breakers and large diameters of 3 other existing bolts. Following walkdown issue was discussed with Breaker Component Engineer (Lubrano) who said bolting was normal and acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NI ULi N/A[:]YEZ NDI U[D N/AE1 Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-50 of 434 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-013 Equipment ID No. BUS 5A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 5A 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN ND UE- N/ADl anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YD ND UDJ N/A[H (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE ND UD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinets will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

Masonry (brick & block) walls in the area are seismically qualified per Computech report R547.01.Y[ NDI UID N/AD-YN ND UDl N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-51 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NR U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-013 Equipment ID No. BUS 5A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 5A 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NFi Ut-l N/AE1 Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NF1 UFi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UFD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Overhead breaker hoist is adequately secured.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A219340, Rev 2, Conduit layout control building elevation 15"-0" plan for install of fire dampers.209196, Rev 11, Control building fire detection system, cable spread room elev 33'-0" CR IP2-2012-06120 AWC-002 qu6i3 G/64ý h :" Nic~k Crisne~fi Date: 10-9-2012 Y-7 .10-9-2012 Stephen Yuan-:ý WItýh ý -0) ýLt Dan Nuta 10-9-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-52 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEl UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-013 Equipment ID No. BUS 5A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 5A Photographs Note: Pictures could not be taken while meeting the procedural camera standoff requirement.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-53 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE Ni-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-014 Equipment ID No. BUS 6A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 6A Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cubicle doors were opened. Internals were examined and judged to be anchored adequately.

Visible floor anchorage acceptable.

It was noted most breakers did not have a lower left bolt and/or smaller bottom bolts connecting the breaker to the back of the cubicle. Missing bolts where judged acceptable given weight of breakers and large diameters of 3 other existing bolts. Following walkdown issue was discussed with Breaker Component Engineer (Lubrano) who said bolting was normal and acceptable.

Cubicle 52/3A T6A Bus tie 3A to 6A 480V 6A-7B was racked out and work inprogress tagged with having a broken rack stop mechanism.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YD- NO Y[ NEI UDJ N/A--YO NDI uD- N/AD Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-54 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YN ND-- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-014 Equipment ID No. BUS 6A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 6A 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NDI UrI N/AD--anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YDI NDI UD- N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ ND: uD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinets will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

Masonry (brick & block) walls are in the area and are seismically qualified per Computech report R54 7. 01.Y[ NDI UDl N/AD: YM NDI UlI N/ADl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-55 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ ND I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-014 Equipment ID No. BUS 6A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 6A 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ ND- U[-I N/AD--Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND- UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Overhead breaker hoist is adequately secured with chain and lock.YE NDI uD Comments_(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings:

A219340, Rev 2, Conduit layout Control Building elev. 15-0 plan for install of fire dampers SQUG (SEWS)CR IP2-2012-06120 AWC-002 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell&TV4~ CX(~eJ2i'Date: 10-9-2012 10-9-2012 Stenh~n Vwmn Stenhen Yuan Dan Nuta 10-9-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-56 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YM NR UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-014 Equipment ID No. BUS 6A Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 6A Photographs Note: Pictures could not be taken while meeting the procedural camera standoff requirement.

Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-57 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NO UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-015 Equipment ID No. 52/RTA Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinet anchorage inspected by looking through bottom vent opening.All visible anchors in good condition.

Anchorage of components internal to cabinet could not be examined at time of inspection.

Cabinet to be powered down and internals inspected.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y'-O NE YO NEI UE N/A[L YED NO u[] N/AL Mild surface corrosion acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y3 NE U- N/AL EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-58 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE] NE] uN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-015 Equipment ID No. 52/RTA Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NE] U[-I N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[-] NE] UZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the externaly visible anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Internals to be inspected when cabinet is powered down. See questions 2.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinet will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture for added protection.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YEZ NE] UE] N/AE]YE NE] UE- N/A[YE NEI] u[ N/A[YN NEI uE]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-59 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE-1 N[-] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-015 Equipment ID No. 52/RTA Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[-- U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cover on west side of cabinet is missing 3 of 14 screws. Cabinet with missing screws judged acceptable during seismic event. CR IP2-2012-06155 issued to track resolution.

See A WC-003 for reference.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings:9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building.A WC-003)ttr, I kýEvaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/11/2012 qkAýg Nick Crisnell 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-60 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YF-- NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-015 Equipment ID No. 52/RTA Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A Photographs Note: RTA cabinet looking from east of side.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-61 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YN NFI- UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-016 Equipment ID No. SST5 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is present but is internal to transformer which makes anchors not visible externally.

Multiple bolts present securing cover shut, no hinge present so panels are not required to be opened.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YED NN YEJ NEI ULI N/AN YE] NI I U[D N/A[Anchorage not visible.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE' NiD uD-- N/AE Anchorage not visible.IEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-62 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND-- UF--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-016 Equipment ID No. SST5 E Equipment Description STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class' 4 YDI NDI UD- N/A[R YN NMU[-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN NEI UD1 N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UD- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinets will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

Masonry (brick & block) walls in the area are seismically quafified per Computech report R54 7.01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ ND- uDl N/AD:]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-63 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE Njj1 UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-016 Equipment ID No. SST5 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[Z NEI U--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Overhead breaker hoist is adequately secured.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A247343-00, Rev 0, 480V SWGR Room equipment, plan sections and details, control building elev.15'A219340, Rev 2, Conduit layout control building elevation 15'-0" plan for install of fire dampers.9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building.CR IP2-2012-06120 A WC-002 0 A/~ce) C/6 k 4 e~a~'Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/9/2012ýtvý 10/9/2012 Stephen Yuan-;:ý ýýý ý -0) mrz D Nuta 10/9/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-64 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-016 Equipment ID No. SST5 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A Photographs Note: Pictures could not be taken while meeting the procedural camera standoff requirement of 6'.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-65 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE N--j UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-017 Equipment ID No. BB8 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15"0O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora-ge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NE]The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Isthe anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NEI UD] N/A[--YE NEI U-i N/AD-YIZ NEI UD- N/AL]Floor coated. No visible cracks.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-66 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-017 Equipment ID No. BB8 Equip. Class' 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? NDI U- N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 126811, 206647 and SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI uD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulb could fall out of the light fixture and hit component.

Falling bulb would not damage the component because the equipment is protected by a hard case. CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to secure bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YN NDI UED N/AD YZ NDI ul N/AD-Y[ NDI uDl N/AD-Y[ NEI UD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-67 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ NLI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-017 Equipment ID No. BB8 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5 holes in both ends for transformer side panel are judged acceptable by walk down team. These holes where judged to be for attaching different components to the case as the holes are high up on the side of the case. Looking through vents there were no internal components in the area of these holes so no bolts in these holes is acceptable.

References:

Vendor drawing 126811, Matra electric, inc.9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building CR IP2-2012-06120 AWC-001 6 2 Akýg r eAlýýEvaluated by: Nick Crisyell Date: 10-9-2012.Stpnhpn Vi~n Stephen Yuan 10-9-2012 10-9-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-68 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NI I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-017 Equipment ID No. BB8 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER Photographs No photo due to restriction of EN-DC-217 Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-69 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND I UiD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-018 Equipment ID No. BC2 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33X-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-I NO The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YOZ NEI U-- N/Ar-D YO NO ul N/AD YO ND UDJ N/AD Equipment attached to unistrut anchored to a seismicly designed masonry wall. No significant visible cracks in masonry wall.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-70 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ ND-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-018 Equipment ID No. BC2 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NDI ULI N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI uI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI UiD N/A[D 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI Ui1 N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall qualified by computech report no. R547.01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.Y[Z NDI UD- N/ADl 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI UiD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-71 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NR UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-018 Equipment ID No. BC2 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[i: UI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:

A206648, Rev 46 Conduit layout control building, elev. 33'-0", plan west half A206640, Rev 10, Arrangement of equipment in cable spresd room, elev. 33'-0" AWC-004 Ll VK4 Cý1ýEvaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-11-2012 A--Dan Nuta 10-11-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-72 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ N-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-018 Equipment ID No. BC2 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 Photographs Note: Transformer BC2 Note: Transformer BC2 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-73 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YZ ND- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-019 Equipment ID No. BB9 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N-]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Minor surface corrosion on anchors. Judged accepable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NDJ UE- N/AD Y[ NDl ULID N/AD1 YN ND- UDI N/AD-Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-74 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-019 Equipment ID No. BB9 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y!N NDl ULi N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 325413.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[ NDI UD-- N/AD Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UD] N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulb could fall on equipment.

But judged accepable due to hardened target. CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installing wire to secure bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI uDl N/ADýYes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI uD--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-75 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ N-I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-019 Equipment ID No. BB9 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEil UEl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

West side panel cover has one bolt loose. Missing side panel cover bolt/screw on east panel. Both panels missing washer on some bolts. These issues are acceptable seismicly.

CR IP2-2012-06495 issued for tracking.

References:

Drawings and A WC 325413-00, Anchoring of Pressurizer Heater Transformer A206647, Rev. 15, Indian Point No. 2 conduit layout Control Building elevation 15'-0" plan 9321-F-3052, Rev.38, Equipment arrangement Control Building CR IP2-2012-06495 A WC-001 qlAý( G/x&au Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/09/2012

__________________________1 0/09/2012 Stephen Yuan D Nuta 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-76 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ N-- UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-019 Equipment ID No. BB9 Equip. Class' 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER Photographs Note: PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-77 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: Y] NW I UWl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-020 Equipment ID No. 0021SIP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[I NEI The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NWI UW1 N/AEW YE NWI UWi N/AEl YE NW] UW1 N/AW Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-78 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND I UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELlI-020 Equipment ID No. 0021SIP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NEI UI- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 9321-F- 1167.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI uEl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[ NDI UDl N/ADl Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDI UD1 N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

One light bulb is blown out near component.

This is not a seismic issue Lights Out Hotline (X-7600) was contacted regarding the light out. CR IP2-2012-06581 was also issued.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI uDl N/AD1 Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDl UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-79 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE N-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-020 Equipment ID No. 0021SIP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE ND UI-D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 9321-F-1 167, Rev 24 (A200107), Primary Auxiliary Building concrete plans at elv. 59' and 68'9321-F-1166, Rev26 (A200106), Primary Auxiliary Building concrete plans at elv. 15', 35' & 42'AWC-017 CR IP2-2012-06581 orhýc9 X1541 g Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/23/2012

ý&ý, P-ýKirit Parikh 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-80 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NM UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-020 Equipment ID No. 0021S/P Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 Photographs Note: 21 Safety injection pump, front view Note: The motor of the safety injection pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-81 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-020 Equipment ID No. 0021SIP Eauipment DescriDtion SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 IP2 Status: YE NR U-Equip. Class 1 5 Note: The handle of the S.I pump and associated pipings.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-82 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl--021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YZ NDI Y[ NDI U[ N/ADl Y[ NI ULI N/AD Y[N ND uD N/AD-Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-83 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NEI UI- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant drawings B227200-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI uDl N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI uDl N/AD'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDi UD1 N/ADl Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI uDýof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-84 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NP U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U[-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The panel attached to the pump is not required to be opened due to the number of bolts closing the cover. The inside of the panel therefore is not inspected.

References:

Drawings and A WC 1. SQUG O021AFP 2. DWG 9321-F-2014, Rev12 Auxiliary Feed Pump Building General Arrangement Sheet No. 1 3. DWG B227200,Rev 1, Auxiliary Boiler Feed Pumps #21 and #23 4. AWC-035 Date: 10/25/2012 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan<ii ~Paul Huebsch Date: 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-85 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ ND-] UF-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Photographs Note: AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Note: EQUIPMENT TAG EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-86 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NRI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Note: ANCHOR BOLT CLOSE UP VIEW Note: THE PANEL ATTAHCING TO THE PUMP CANN'T BE OPENED. INSIDE OF THE PANEL IS NOT INSPECTED.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-87 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 IP2 Status: YN N[D UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. O022AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 Location:

Bldg. AF Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NEI Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Grout at one anchor bolt is chipped off to the edge of the base plate leaving approximately 1 Y 2" edge distance for the anchor bolt (See photo). Since the grout does not contribute to the pullout cone this is not of consideration for bolt tension. Further, the grout is not considered to contribute to shear capacity and the embedment of the cast-in anchor bolt into the floor does not show evidence of cracking.Therefore, the absence of the grout is not a seismic concem.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NEI U-- N/A-YN NO UE1 N/AED YN NEI uF] N/AD1 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-88 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 1P2 Status: YZ ND1 UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. O022AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ ND Ui- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant drawings B227200-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN ND UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE ND UD N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO ND UDJ N/ADJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO ND uD-- N/AD--]Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NDI uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-89 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NiI ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. 0022AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nil ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 1. SQUG O022AFP 2. DWG 9321-F-1208, Rev8, Shield Wall Area, Concrete plan EL. 18'-6" 3. B208484, Rev 3, Auxiliary Building Feed Pump #22 Balancing Chamber Pressure Tap 4. B2279770, Rev 0, Physical Protectors for Aux Boiler Feed Pumps #21, #22, #23 and Valve 846 5. DWG 9321-F-2014, Rev12, AFPB General Arrangement, Plan -SHT. NO 1 6. AWC-035 Date: 10/25/12 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan 10/25/12 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-90 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. O022AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 Photographs Note: AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 Note: Grout around one anchor bolt is chipped off on one side EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-91 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 IP2 Status: YEZ Nr-] UD-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. O022AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Descrption AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 Note: One of the scaffold supports is pointing to the conduit.Note: One of the scaffold supports is pointing to the base of nitrogen rack.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-92 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Note: One of the supports is braced to the base of the pump Note: EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-93 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: Y] NEIl U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CCW PUMP NO. 23 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?NEI The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NEI UL1 N/A[-D Y[ NDI UD1 N/AD-YN NO UD1 N/AD1 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-94 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NFD Ui--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Ec Equipment Description CCW PUMP NO. 23 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 9321-F-1 167 & 9321-F-1 166.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 5 YE NEI UD- N/ADl YZ NEI UDl Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN NDI UL N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI ULI N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs need wire restraint to prevent bulbs from falling during a seismic event CR IP2-2012-6614 was issued to track resolution.

This is not a seismic issue if the fluorescent bulbs were to fall they would not render the hard target CCW Pump inoperable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI uD- N/ADl Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDl UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-95 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: N-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CCW PUMP NO. 23 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UIE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-20143, (A201813), Rev 9 Auxiliary feed pump building general arrangement plans Sht. 1 9321-F-1 167,(A200107), Rev 24, Primary Auxiliary building concrete, plans at elev. 59' & 68'.9321-F-1166,(A200106), Rev 26 Primary Auxiliary building concrete, plans at elev. 15',35' & 42'CR IP2-2012-6614 AWC-018 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19/2012 Paul Huebsch (J 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-96 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE N-- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CCW PUMP NO. 23 Photographs Note: CCW Pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-97 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP EauiDment Description CCW PUMP NO. 23 Status: YZ NF- Ur-Equip. Class 1 5 Note: Typical anchorage EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-98 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NDI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-024 Equipment ID No. 21CLWP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description 21 I/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PMP Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD- NO The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO ND UD1 N/ADJ YE NO UD-- N/ADl Minor surface corrosion on anchor bolts. Not significant.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete coated. No significant cracking observed.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NDI uD N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-99 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ NEI U F-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-024 Equipment ID No. 21CLWP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description 21 1/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-1 NEI UI- N/A[E (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NDI UDI N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry brick wall was seismic qualified by Computech Report no.R547.01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEi UDl N/A[D Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN ND-] UD--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-100 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SE Sheet 3 of 4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-024 Equipment ID No. 21CLWP Equipment Description 21 I/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SQUG (SEWS)AWC-001 EISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YE NEI UFL Equip. Class 1 5 Y9 NEI uD]Evaluated by: Nick Crispell o~ C~~1 eJ2U Date: 10-9-2012 10-9-2012--tw jhe... Yu..n Stenhen Yuan V~&L Dan Nuta 10-9-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-101 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEIl UFL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-024 Equipment ID No. 21CLWP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description 21 1/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PMP Photographs Note: 21 1/A COMPRESSOR CLOSING COOLING WATER PUMP (RIGHT)Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-102 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEil UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.

The base plate has 4 bolts and only 2 are visible. The other 2 are hidden under the lead shielding.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware for the visible bolts.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation for the visible bolts. Since the bolts appear to be stainless steel, it is doubtful that the hidden bolts would have any corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y-I NE Yr NEI U[-- N/A--Yr NEI uD-- N/AD--Y[ NE D U[-] N/ADl Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-103 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NFD U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI Nil U-I N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NO U[--I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YE NEI U-I N/A--YE NDI ID N/AD-]YE NDI uD- N/AD-Y[ ND uD-U EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-104 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[- UI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings: 9321-F-1 168, Rev. 29, Primary Auxiliary Building Concrete Floor Plan at EL. 80'-0" B228653, Rev. 1, Replacement Boric Acid Transfer Pumps No. 21 & 22 9321-F-2510, Rev. 49, Primary Auxiliary Building General Arrangement Plans SQUG (SEWS)A WC-022 q&T\M CA -~Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19/2012 10/19/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-105 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE N-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 Photographs Note: View of pump Note: View of pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-106 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 Note: Anchor bolt at motor Note: Anchor bolts at motor EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-107 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 1P2 Status: YZ ND-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. O023CHP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YEZ NO YE NEl uD-- N/Ar-D Y[ NDl ULI N/AD-1 Y1Z NDl U[: N/AD I Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name frtom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-108 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YZ ND I UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. O023CHP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NDI UD N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant calculation IP-CALC-04-01180.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YN NEI UD Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y] NDI UD N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI ULI N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry wall is qualified by Computech report R547.01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YE; NDI uDl N/AD1 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-109 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 1P2 Status: YE N-I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. 0023CHP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A207647, Rev 5, Hanger location, install of suction stabilizers and pulsation dampeners for charging pump 21,22 and 23 Calc no. IP-CALC-04-01180.

A WC-021 6 A/Q~) 3xk 4~~Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19/201210/19/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-110 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NM UM-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. O023CHP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP Photographs Note: View of pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-1il of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. O023CHP Equipment Description NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP IP2 Status: YZ N- U-II Equip. Class 1 5 Note: Ductwork above pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-112 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Note: Anchor bolt EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-113 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 1P2 Status: YN NiDI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NRi-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NDl uD-- N/A--YN NDI UE1 N/ADl YE NDI UiD N/ADJ Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-114 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 IP2 Status: YN NDI UR-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ ND UI- N/A[: (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant drawings 9321-F-1167

& 9321-F-1166.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Scaffold overhead is marked unsafe per scaffold tag 866B. It is not braced well in the east/west direction and would impact valve if it collapses or sways during a seismic event. CR IP2-2012-06578 was issued to resolve.YD NE uD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y] NDI UD N/AD: and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI UD N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YD NZ UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?No as scaffolding over top of valve is likely to collapse onto valve during a seismic event.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-115 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: YZ NE-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE] UL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-1I166, (A200106)

Rev 26, Primary Auxiliary building concrete, plans at elevation 15',35'& 42'.9321-F-1167,(A 200107), Rev 24, Primary Auxiliary building concrete plans at elevations 59', and 68'.AWC-019 67fQ9C CXA* u Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19/2012 Paul Huebsch 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-116 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YE Ni- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Photographs Note: Note: Scaffold over pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-117 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 1P2 Status: YEZ NE-- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Note: Scaffold over pump Note: Anchor bolt EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-118 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Status: YDI NEI- U[Z Equip. Class 2 5 Note: Pump 2 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-119 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NF] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 21 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15"-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NO The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of'Equipment.

Y[ NO ULi N/AD-YE NDI UD N/AD-1 YN NDl UDl N/A--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-120 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NW I UW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE3 NM U[-I NIAI](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches the drawing A200106.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NEI u-' N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NWI UW- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall exists on west side of the RHR Pump 21.The wall is qualified per SQUG (SEWS)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[:- UWl N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NiD uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-121 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ N-- U --Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NiD uLI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference Drawings & AWC A200106, Rev 26, Primary Auxiliary building, plan at elev. 15'-0" AWC-026ý&ý, P--ý -Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/23/2012 Nick Crispell 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-122 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE ND-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 21 Photographs Note: Front view of the pump no 21 Note: Comer view of the pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-123 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 21 IP2 Status: YE ND-- Ur-D Equip. Class 1 6 Note: connections to the pump 21 Note: Anchor Bolt of the pump.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-124 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NFW UW1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NEI The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ NWI UW N/AEl YE NW U- N/AEW YE NWI uWJ N/A-Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.'Enter the equipment class name fiom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-125 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NDi Ui- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches the drawing A200106.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI UD- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall exists near the RHR Pump about 4' away. The wall is qualified per SQUG (SEWS)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI UD- N/AD:]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN ND-] UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0. Page C-126 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ Nil UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NR ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A200106, Rev 26, Auxiliary building, plan details at elev. 15'-0" SQUG (SEWS)AWC-027 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/23/2012 6T~~c 1~r/~j Nick crisoell 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-127 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NF1 U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 Photographs Note: Front view of the pump Note: Anchor Bolts of the pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-128 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 Status: YE N-- UD--Equip. Class 1 6 Note: Anchor Bolt view of the pump EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-129 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND 1 U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. O022SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the Rem one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?2 of the anchor bolts are flush with the nuts. Judged acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NEJ YE NI uLID N/AD Y[ ND-- UD- N/AD Minor surface rust. Judged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NDI UDI N/AD--Floor is coated with approximately 2" of epoxy. Coating is flaking and chipping.

No significant cracking observed.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-130 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ ND I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. O022SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NDI U-- N/A[: (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI UDEl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ ND I UDl N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UDl N/ADJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Near by fence judged adequate for seismic loading by comparison to the wind loads.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE ND: UDl N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NDI UD-]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-131 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE Nni- Ui Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. O022SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings: SQUG (0022SWP)AWC-014 I-1 V4Qg CX1 4ýaýEvaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-17-2012 V~KA-_Dan Nuta 10-17-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-132 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[Z NF-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. O022SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP Photographs Note: Typical anchorage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-133 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. O022SWP Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP IP2 Status: YE NR URi Equip. Class 1 6 Note: Typical anchorage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-134 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE NR UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y[ NDI YO NEI uJD N/AEj YE NDI UDE N/AD Minor surface corrosion.

Judged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ NEI ulI N/AF]Floor is coated with approximately 2 inches of epoxy coating. Epoxy coating is chipping, flaking, and has hair line cracks. No significant visible cracks to suggest concrete was cracked below epoxy. Judged acceptable.

Enter the equipment class name firom EPR1 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-135 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YE ND 1 UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP E Equipment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 6 YZ NE Uil N/AD YM ND-1UDl Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ NEI UD- N/AD1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-I N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fence posts shows corrosion on baseplate.

Judged acceptable.

Fence post and baseplate judged adequate for seismic loading by comparison to the wind loads.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI uD- N/AD-1 Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ ND1 uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-136 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ Ni D UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN Ni uFi-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No tag on the pump. CR IP2-2012-06546 issued to tag the pump.

References:

Drawings and AWC.Drawings:

A227488, Rev 2, Intake structure location of service water pipe welds.AWC-014 r- ,1, , A k,, hliýL, lz r I onll LVOlUOLCu uy,#VILJI%

LY VV Date: 10-17-2012 10-17-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-137 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE ND U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP Photographs Note: 26 Service Water F Note: Typical anchor bolt.EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-138 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP EauiDment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP IP2 Status: YZ NiD UD--Equip. Class 1 6 Note: Typical anchor bolt.Note: Typical anchor bolt.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-139 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YE NI-- Ui--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 Location:

Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-- NO The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YEZ NO U] N/AD YE ND UDI N/AD-YOi ND LJEJ N/AO Anchorage is to a steel pipe riser not to concrete.Enter the equipment class name from EPR 11025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-140 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NF-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YDI NEI UI- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UI--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Ground wire conduit & pump power conduit close to pump flange.Acceptable given rigidity of pump and conduits.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead pipe near the roof line of the EDG building is supported on three wide flange columns. These columns are supported on baseplates with some nuts not fully engaged. Typical of all three baseplates.

LB-02 was performed to analyze the condition.

The high voltage transmission tower located east of the valve is judged by walk down team to be seismically acceptable compared to wind and icing loads.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YE NDI U-- N/AD--YDI NE U-I N/ADl YE ND- U[l N/AD--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-141 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE ND I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEJ ULI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nil U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cover plates on pump is missing 2 of 8 screws. Typical for both cover plates on pump. While seismically acceptable, new screws must be installed to prevent water intrusion.

See photo below. CR IP2-2012-06383 issued to track resolution.

Sealant on end of ground wire conduit for the Fuel Oil Transfer Pump D. G. 23 is not adequate to seal the conduit against water intrusion.

While this is not a seismic concern, the conduit should be properly sealed. CR IP2-2012-06383 issued to track resolution.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-22513(A-202024), Rev 9, Diesel generator building general arrangement elevations.

AWC-012 qAAý(;Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-16-2012 Dran Nuta 10-16-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-142 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NEI- Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 Photographs Note: Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Note: Cover plate missing 2 of 8 screws, EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-143 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE Nn UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 Note: Insulation damaged on discharge from Fuel Oil Transfer Pump.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-144 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 43'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[- NO The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Valve is in-line however the actuator has a spring can support, for which support was inspected.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YZ NDI ULIE N/ADl YE NEI UDI N/AD1 YE ND) U0 N/AD Concrete around floor penetration has about 6 cracks. They are thermal cracks. Judged accepable.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-145 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ ND U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YD] ND] ULI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UIE'potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE NDl UD[] N/AD--Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND: UiD N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDl uDl N/AD1 Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-146 of 434 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND 1 UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-] uI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Commentl (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-2125, Rev 24, (A200450), Auxiliary feed pump building, turbine supply &exhaust piping plans and sections.9321-H-23613, Rev 0, Auxiliary building feed pump turbine steam supply equilizing lines around control valves PCV-1310A and PCV 1310-B AWC-010 q 6 AAP C/OeA*ýi Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-12-2012 tnmnhnn V, nn a 12-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-147 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YIZ N-I U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Photographs Note: Note: AUX FEED WA TER PUMP 22 TURB STEAMSUPPL Y SHUT-OFF VALVE THE IN-LINE MOTOR OPERATED VALVE, ACTUATOR HAS SPRING CAN SUPPORT EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-148 of 434 ATnACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ N-- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Note: CONCRETE AROUND FLOOR PENETRATION HAS ABOUT 6 CRACKS. IT IS APEAR TO BE THERMAL CRACKS Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-149 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NMI- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 32'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YE- NE Y[Z NEI UL-- N/A--Valve is in line. Actuator is supported on a spring can.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YN NO U-1 N/A--Y[ NDi UD1 N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-150 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YrE ND Uil Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO NEI- ULI N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ Nil ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE NOi U[I N/AMl Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ Nil ULI N/ALi and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[J Nl ULiO N/AL]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEl ULII of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-151 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YEE ND UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Fluorescent bulbs in area needs to be secured to light fixture by wires. Bulb falling would not pose a seismic operability issue for this component given location of bulbs and target. CR IP2-2012-06485 is issued to track resolution.

References:

Drawings and AWC.Drawings:

9321-L-60825, Rev 6, Pipe support details sht.26 9321-F-21253, (A201324)

Rev 13, Auxiliary feed pump building turbine supply and exhaust piping plans and sections.9321-H-23613, Rev 0, Auxiliary feed pump building turbine steam supply equalizing lines around control valves PCV 1310A and PCV 1310 B 9321-F-2125, (A200450,)

Rev 24, Auxiliary feed pump building turbine supply and exhaust piping plans and sections.AWC-009 qkkAg r alyýýEvaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/12/12 10/12/12 Stephen Yuan EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-152 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NER U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Photographs Note: PCV-1310B Note: PCV-1310B ACTUATOR AND SUPPORT EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-153 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YIZ Nn- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176 Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VLV Location:

Bldg. EDG Floor El. 67'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No anchorage check. In-line valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YDI N[: LIDJ N/AO Not applicable since it is an in-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YEl ND UDl N/AN Not applicable since it is an in-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Not applicable since it is an in-line valve.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YDI ND UDi N/A[EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-154 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176 Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VLV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI ND- UEi N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is an in-line valve.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[R Nij ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[N NDJ UL- N/A[D 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI U[-- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Scaffolding nearby has been engineering evaluated per scaffolding tag signoffs.

Judged to be seismicly adequate.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI UD:] N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDi UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-155 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ ND-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176 Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VL V Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEIl Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Minor surface corrosion observed in valves, pipes, and steel components.

Judged acceptable.

References:

9321-F-2257, Rev 47, (A200600), Diesel generator building cooling water piping river water system.9321-F-2722, Rev 126, Flow diagram service water system nuclear steam supply.Vendor drawing no. R-000853-1, Rev C A WC-011&T\cA IX~Evaluated by: -Nick Crispefl Date: 10-16-2012 Stenhen Yuan Stenhen Yuan-:ýýVý ý- O)týý10-16-2012 10-16-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-156 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YIE NDI U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176 Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VL V Photographs Note: Jacket water cooler return flow control valve.Note: Jacket water cooler return flow control valve.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-157 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VL V Location:

Bldg. EDG Floor El. 67'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-I NO No anchorage check. The valve is a in-line valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Y[- NW uOi N/A[No anchorage check. The valve is a in-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yil NW uil N/AIZ No anchorage check. The valve is a in-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YEi NO uW N/AO No anchorage check. The valve is a in-line valve.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-158 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: NEI-- UI]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VLV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI UI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is an in-line valve.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ NO U-- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NWI U[-- N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Scafolding nearby has been engineering evaluated per scaffolding tag signoffs.

Judged to be seismicly adequate.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI U- N/AW Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y2 NEI UW of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-159 of 434 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YIZ Nn UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VLV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[i-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Minor surface corrosion observed in valves, pipes, and steel components.

Judged acceptable.

References:

9321-F-2257, Rev 47, (A200600), Diesel generator building cooling water piping river water system.932 1-F-2722, Rev 126, Flow diagram service water system nuclear steam supply.Vendor drawing no.R-000853-1 Rev C.AWC-011 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-16-2012 Stephen Yuan 10-16-2012 Dan Nuta 10-16-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-160 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YIZ NR U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VL V Photographs Note: Jacket water cooler return flow control valve.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-161 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YIZ NDl UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV Location:

Bldg. PPEN & MEZZ Floor El. 51'-0" & 67'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN Nil The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The Valve is a motor operated valve. The motor operator is anchored on floor elevation 67'6" and the valve is on elevation 51'. Both motor operator and valve were inspected for this component.

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NEJ UD- N/AD I YE NDI U-- N/A-1 Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No, IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-162 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ ND-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDI Ui N/AD anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NDI UD- N/AD1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration matches drawings A208690-4 Rev 04, 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI uD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YN ND-1 uD- N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-163 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE ND I UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN Nil U[-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nil Uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A208690 Rev 04, Addition of Motor Operators for valves No's. 205, 958, 869 A&B, 250 A, B, C, & D.02-403-0012, Rev. 3, Motor Operations for Cont. Isol Valves M.O. For Valves 250A-D, 205.SQUG (SEWS)AWC-028, and AWC-029 Evaluated by: Kirit Pqrikh Date: 10/24/2012 qlAýA Nick Crispell 10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineenng Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-164 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YEZ N[-] UOi-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV Photographs Note: Valve anchorage at elevation 67'EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-165 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equipment Description 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV IP2 Status: YZ NI I UD--Equip. Class 1 8 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-166 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YfZ N] 1 Ut-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. SWN-51-1A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE Location:

Bldg. MEZZ Floor El. 67'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?NE]The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild corrosion both on plate and the anchor bolts. Judged not to be a seismic concern.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NEI U-I N/AL YE N[-] N/A[L Y[] NEI UZ- N/AEL Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-167 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ ND I UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. SWN-51-1A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NO UL- N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration matches drawing A208160-12-SR-51-1A Rev 0.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NO U-] N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UE] N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE] U[L] N/AU]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YED N] U--I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-168 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YO NEI- ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. SWN-51-IA Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEi UI-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A208160, Rev. 04, Arrg't of Motor Operated Valves in Service Water Sample Lines to Radiation Monitor 12-SR-51-1A, Rev 0, Support A WC-028 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/24/2012 Nick Crispell 10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-169 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YN NF-] UO]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. SWN-51-1A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE Photographs Note: Bolts Note: Corrosion on the plate EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-170 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YN NE] UFi-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. 1870 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE Location:

Bldg. PPEN & MEZZ Floor El. 51'-0"& 67'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y] NEO The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Valve is in line with a motor operator.

Valve is on elevation 51' and motor operator for valve is anchored to the 67'6" floor.Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Mild surface rust, acceptable, no seismic concerns.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Inline valve is not anchored into the concrete; anchorage is on elevation 67' for motor operator.Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NFI UD1 N/A-YE NE]I UD N/ADl YN NE] U0 N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-171 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ ND UDLI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. 1870 Ec Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration matches drawing B-227173-0 Rev 0, &B229713-1 Rev 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 8 YE NEI U- N/AE-YE NEI uD-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ NR UID N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NWI U-I N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI uWl N/A[]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDl ULD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-172 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NFD UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. 1870 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

B-227173 Rev 0, Installation of motor operators for valves no. 743 & 1870, B229713 Rev I.Mounting details for RHR mini flow line MOVs 743 and 1870 for install of Redundant indication system, A WC-029 Evaluated by: -Kirit Parikh Date: 10/24/2012 Nick Crisoefl 1 014ýý10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-173 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YN NLI- UFiJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. 1870 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE Photographs No picture possible of component due to the procedurally required camera stand off distance.Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-174 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YN NFD U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. 4928 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 51'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora-ae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-- NE The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YN NO UD N/AD YN NDI ULi N/ADl YE ND Ul N/AD--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-175 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND I UD-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. 4928 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NDI UIE- N/AE](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDi UD--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YM ND UlO N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND ULI N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI UD- N/ADl Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[Z NDI uFD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-176 of 434 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ N- UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. 4928 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEJ uin adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Engineering approved long term scaffolding built around the area is judged seismicly adequate.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

A 208080 Rev 06, Alternate reactor coolant pump seal injection system A228177 Rev 01, Diag of conn's for post accident M.O. V.'s 850B, 250A, 250B, 869A, 4926, 870, 4928, 958.AWC-029 E~valuated hv: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/24/2012 Nick Crisne/1 qvog r 064ýý10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-177 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ N-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. 4928 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV Photographs Note: Valve 4928 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-178 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 51V-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Valve is in-line, motor operator is supported.

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YD NE Y[ ND I UDl N/A[D YE NDI UD- N/AD YE NDJ UID N/ADJ Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-179 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ N[W UW--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Ec Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

luip. Class 1 8 YO NEI UI- N/AZ YE NEI Uil Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NEI uW N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI Ui- N/AEW and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NW ULI N/A[]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NO U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-180 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ ND UD7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N-- U[-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 9321-F-2736, Rev 129, Flow diagram chemical & volume control system.AWC-029 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/24/2012 qlhý49 r OA64ýýNit* E rric 10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-181 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE Photographs I Note:I Note: Valve structure from comer te structure and associated commodities EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-182 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE IP2 Status: YZ N-- UD-Equip. Class 1 8 Note: oWncrete wal1111.concrete wall EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-183 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ N-- U --Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Location:

Bldg. AF Floor El. 77'-4" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y NOi Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Not applicable since the anchorage is attached to steel plate.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YIN NO UD- N/A--YE NO UD- N/AD--Y-I N-- UD' N/A[EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-184 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ ND I UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. SOV-1230 Eq Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing A227166-3.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

uip. Class 1 8 YE NDI UD- N/A--YN NEI U--Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN NDI U[- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND: UD- N/AD-]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDJ UD: N/AD: Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI uD-]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-185 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YI NFD UL-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[: U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 1. Dwg A227166, Rev 3, Replacement of main steam isolation valve solenoids. (Con Ed) drawing 2. Dwg D227176, Rev 0 (Con Ed) drawing 3. AWC-036 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/25/2012 P~ql 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-186 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NI I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIVSOV Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-187 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE NF1 UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-044 Equipment ID No. SOV-1231 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 77'-4" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora-ge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[Z NDI YZ NDI uD- N/A--YE NDI UD N/ADýYDI NEI UDI N/A[Not applicable since the anchorage is attached to steel.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-188 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM.Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ ND I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-044 Equipment ID No. SOV-1231 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NDI UD- N/AD--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant drawings A227166-3 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ NDI UD- N/AfD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI U[D] N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI UD1 N/AD-'Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-189 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YIZ ND UD]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-044 Equipment ID No. SOV-1231 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIVSOV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Dwg A227166, Rev 3, Replacement of main steam isolation valve solenoids. (Con Ed drawing)Dwg D227176, Rev 0, Gen sta Unit 2 main stm sys isol. Loops vas MS-1-21, MS1-22, MSI-23 &MS1-24 A WC-036 C. ~ ~ Qf h-I .,.,. -.. tn V. ', r-VdiUdateU Y -ýAqýI46~Date: 10/25/2012 Date: 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-190 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NI I Ur--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-044 Equipment ID No. SOV-1231 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Photographs Control Room would not permit pictures.Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-191 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ NE] UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-045 Equipment ID No. SOV-1232 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIVSOV Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 77'-4" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YIZ NEI Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ NE] U[I N/AiDI YN NE] LIE] N/AD YE] NEI UE] N/AZ Not applicable since the anchorage is attached to steel plate.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-192 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[E NDI UJi1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-045 Equipment ID No. SOV-1232 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Yr NDI Ur N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant documentation A227166-3 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UD[-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YN NDI UD N/AD YZ NDI uD N/AD1 YZ ND uD N/AD YZ NODUD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-193 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-045 Equipment ID No. SOV-1232 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEil U iF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Dwg A227166, Rev 3, Replacement of main steam isolation valve solenoids. (Con Ed drawing)Dwg D227176, Rev 0, Gen sta Unit 2 main stm sys isol. Loops vas MS-1-21, MS1-22, MS1-23 &MS1-24 AWC-036 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-194 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE Ni D U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-045 Equipment ID No. SOV-1232 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Photographs Control Room would not permit pictures Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-195 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE NM ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-046 Equipment ID No. SOV-1233 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 77-4" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y] NEI Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ NEI UD N/AD-1 Y[ NI uLIE] N/Ar-YDI NEI UD1 N/AZ Not applicable since the anchorage is attached to steel.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-196 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND I ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-046 Equipment ID No. SOV-1233 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NDI ULI N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant drawing A227166-3.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YN NDI UD1 N/AD:]YN NDI u~l N/AED YZ NDI uD- N/AD1 YN NDI uD1 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-197 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NE] UE--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-046 Equipment ID No. SOV-1233 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] Nil Ur-D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Dwg A227166, Rev 3, Replacement of main steam isolation valve solenoids.

Dwg D227176, Rev 0, Gen sta Unit 2 main stm sys isol. Loops vas MS-1-21, MS1-22, MSI-23 &MS1-24 A WC-036 Q" f A V1 t" Valua 1,d Illl I Y* 3 Date: 10/25/2012 Date: 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-198 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NFD U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-046 Equipment ID No. SOV-1233 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIVSOV Photographs Control Room would not permit pictures Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-199 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP2 Status: YO NFD U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-047 Equipment ID No. tF-318 Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description EDG BLDG FAN Location:

Bldg. EDG Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-- NO The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Fireproofing material obstructs view of some anchors. Checked visible anchors.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Anchorage to structural steel.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE N-I UFi N/A--YE N-I ur- N/A--Y-- NO UD- N/AZ EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-200 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NW UW1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-047 Equipment ID No. F-318 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EDG BLDG FAN 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEl NEI UEW N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NWI UW-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YN NWI IJUW N/AW-Y[ NWJ uW- N/A--YN NWJ uWJ N/AWl YN NEI UEW EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-201 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YE N-- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-047 Equipment ID No. F-318 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EDG BLDG FAN Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEIl Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC A246342, Rev. 2, E.D.G. BLDG Ventilation AWC-011 qlhý49 e4pýýEvaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-15-2012

'A_________________

10-15-20 12 Stephen Yuan A----.10-15-2012 Dan NuLq EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-202 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ N-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-047 Equipment ID No. F-318 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EDG BLDG FAN Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-203 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YE ND I ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-048 Equipment ID No. 22CPEF Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 72-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NEI UD N/AD YM NEI ul N/AD YOZ NEI ULIE N/ADýYes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-204 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ ND UDF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-048 Equipment ID No. 22CPEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOl ND UD N/A!Z (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE Nil ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE ND UD-- N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND ULI N/A[iI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y] NDI UD N/ADl Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-205 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ ND1 UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-048 Equipment ID No. 22CPEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEil Ul adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

A metal pulley is on the floor due to maintenance in progress.

Not a seismic concern.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 9321-F-4034, Rev 19, Fan House, PAB, FSB & CB Exh., Purge & Dilution Fans Sections 9321-F-4033, Rev 23, Fan House, PAB, FSB + CB Exh., Purge & Dilution Fans Plans AWC-031 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/24/2012 qlh;(ýg eA"-O-U Nik~k 10/24/2012 Nick crisnell EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-206 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NiI UiL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-048 Equipment ID No. 22CPEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN Photographs Note: Fan identification writing Note: Fan front view EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-207 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-048 Equipment ID No. 22CPEF Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN 1P2 Status: YE N-] UL-Equip. Class 1 9 Note: Fan anchorage view EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-208 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND 1 UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-049 Equipment ID No. 21CPEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ NDI UDI N/A-YIZ ND UtD N/AD Y[ NDI UI- N/AD]Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-209 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YIZ ND- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-049 Equipment ID No. 21CPEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI-- NDi UEi N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDi uL--1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ NDI UiD N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NI U0I N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDl UD- N/ADl Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI uDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-210 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YEZ NFD UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-049 Equipment ID No. 21CPEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NI U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

A loose metal pulley is found on the floor due to maintenance in progress.

Not a seismic concem.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-4034, Rev 19, Fan House, PAB, FSB & CB Exh., Purge & Dilution Fans Sections 9321-F-4033, Rev 23, Fan House, PAB, FSB + CB Exh., Purge & Dilution Fans Plans AWC-031 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh~k6~Date: 10/24/2012 10.24/2012 Nick Crisoell EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-211 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ Nil U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-049 Equipment ID No. 21CPEF Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN Photographs Note: Front view of the fan Note: I EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-212 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-049 Equipment ID No. 21CPEF Equipment Description CB PURGE & PAB EXHUAST FAN 1P2 Status: YN ND-- U-Equip. Class 1 9 Note: Fan 21, facing front part of the fan EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-213 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ Ni I UiD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-050 Equipment ID No. 21ETEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EXHAUST FAN Location:

Bldg. ELE TUNNEL Floor El. 73-7" Room, Area Behind EDG Bldg.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorape 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE Nil The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Minor surface rust, acceptable Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NDJ UD- N/AD I YE NDI UD- N/AD-YE N[D] LiD- N/AD-1 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-214 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-050 Equipment ID No. 21ETEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EXHAUST FAN 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[D NDI U0 N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration verification is required and is consistent with the plant drawing 9321-F-3052-38 Rev 38.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI- U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND- UD-- N/AD--and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Transmission lines over head well protected.

No seismic concern.Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UD- N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yr NDI uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-215 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NE-] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-050 Equipment ID No. 21ETEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EXHAUST FAN Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[:] ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment Arrangement Control Bldg. UFSAR Figure No. 1.2-7 (SHT. 2)AWC-033 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/25/2012 qlkA ew-lký" Nick Crisnefl 10/25/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-216 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ N1 ULI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-050 Equipment ID No. 21ETEF Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EXHAUST FAN Photographs Note: Froni Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-217 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-050 Equipment ID No. 21ETEF Equipment Description EXHAUST FAN IP2 Status: YE N[- U-LI Equip. Class 1 9 Note: View of the base plate and anchors Note: Side view of the exhaust fan EN-DC-168 REV 0 I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-218 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[E NDl U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-051 Equipment ID No. F-216 Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description WALL FAN #216 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Fan is elevated significantly above the floor. Can not see all anchors do to the high elevation of fan. Yes for all anchors observorable from floor.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NEI ULI N/AED YO NEI ULIE N/ADl Surface corrosion.

Judged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YDI NI I UED N/A[No concrete anchorage.

All anchorage to structural steel.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-219 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-051 Equipment ID No. F-216 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description WALL FAN #216 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO-l Nil UL- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEil Ui potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NDI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UI-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI U- N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-220 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-051 Equipment ID No. F-216 Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description WALL FAN #216 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U-I1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC 9321-F-4017, Rev 28, (A-201041), Control building heating vent. And air conditioning plans and sections.9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building.AWC-001~6i3 6"(&~'Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-9-2012 Steohen Yuan--ý m4jýh ý -0) mri, -, 10-9-2012 10-9-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-221 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ Ni-- Ur-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-051 Equipment ID No. F-216 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description WALL FAN #216 Photographs Note: Fan is at high elevation.

Only part of the anchorage/connection can be observed from ground.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-222 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YZ ND- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-057 Equipment ID No. CCRAC2 Equip. Class' 11 Equipment Description CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS)Location:

Bldg. TSC Floor El. 88-6" Room, Area Bldg Roof Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-I NIZ The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is present but not visible. Anchorage is covered with flashing and then flashing is cover with waterproofing as this is a roof mounted AC unit. Equipment has a large foot print and low CG therefore overturning is judged not to be a concern.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y0 NO UDI NIAN YED NEI UEi NfAN Same answer as question 2 above.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Same answer as question 2 above I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE] NDI UD- N/A[EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-223 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND-- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-057 Equipment ID No. CCRAC2 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS)5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NDI UD- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI U--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE ND uID N/AF-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI ULI N/ADJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIZ NDJ UDl N/ADl Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI uDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-224 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-057 Equipment ID No. CCRAC2 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS)Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI urII adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC A226593, Rev 0, Tech Support Center Part Plan Elev. 88'-6" HVAC Arrangement

& Sections 138208, Rev 15, Indian Point Unit No. I Plan at Elevation 88-6" A WC-036 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/25/2012 qu49C/4i2ý Nick Crisnell 10/25/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-225 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NiI- UiD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-057 Equipment ID No. CCRAC2 Equip. Class' 11 Equipment Description CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS)Photographs Note: The condensing unit, CCRAC2,with anchorage area covered with waterproof materials Note: Side view of the condensing unit EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-226 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NFD UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-057 Equipment ID No. CCRAC2 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS)Note: Soft connections on the condensing unit Note: The base of the condensing unit covered with waterproof materials.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-227 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE N-I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-058 Equipment ID No. 211AC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 21 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE ND-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchor bolts have double nuts. One extra nut on top is loose and not touching second nut. Bottom nut is tight. Judged acceptable.

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Coated concrete.

No significant concrete cracking found.YN ND uIDU N/ADl Y[ ND UDJ N/ADl YO NDI UID] N/A[D I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-228 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE Nr-- UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-058 Equipment ID No. 211AC Ec Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

uip. Class 1 12 YE NDI UDl N/AD YE NDI uD--Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NDI UEl N/AD1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry brick wall was seismic qualified by Computech Report no.R547.01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI uD- N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-229 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YE N-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-058 Equipment ID No. 211AC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NI u-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None. 0 UNISTRUT support on the east side of the EP-2 concrete pedestal has one member missing a bolt attached to the pedestal above the base. The support for the EP-2 power conduit is considered acceptable.

However, the missing bolt should be reinstalled.

CR IP2-2012-06495 issued for tracking.* EP-2 tensioning bolt double nut has minor surface rust. OK.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building, UFSAR figure no. 12-7 932 1-F-18543,Rev 10, Control and diesel generator building concrete plan elev. 15'AWC-001~SC 1~CX1~4 G~u Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/09/2012 Stephen Yuan 10/09/2012 10/09/2012 D Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-230 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NF] UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-058 Equipment ID No. 211AC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 21 Photographs 1 Note: Instrument Air Compressor 21 Note: EP-2 pedestal east UNISTRUT support.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-231 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE N-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-059 Equipment ID No. 00221AC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMP 22 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

One comer bolt has two nuts. Bottom one is tight. Acceptable.

Minor surface rust on bolt. Grounding wire shows surface corrosion judged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete coated. No visible cracks in anchor area of significance.

YE ND UD- N/AD YE ND UI N/AD YEE ND]" UD N/ADl Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-232 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND-1 UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-059 Equipment ID No. 00221AC E Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMP 22 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 12 YO NEI UD- N/AD1 YE NEI uD--Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YO NEI UID N/AD--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YDI NO UI- N/AD-]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry brick wall was seismic qualified by Computech Report no.R547.01.Brick wall has crack near column K8, 10.1, appears to be caused by local impact. Not major structural crack.Overhead fluorescent bulb doesn't have wire securing bulb to fixture.CR IP2-2012-06120 addresses the issue.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI uD- N/AD]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-233 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE Ni-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-059 Equipment ID No. 00221AC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMP 22 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[-- U--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building.AWC-001-.r'-7V C/6 4 eýa Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-9-2012) 10-9-2012 Stephen Yuan Dan NUtR 10-9-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-234 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YEZ Ni D UD-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-059 Equipment ID No. 00221AC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMP 22 Photographs Note: Instrument Air Compressor 22 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-235 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND I UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-060 Equipment ID No. 22EDAC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 22 Location:

Bldg. EDG Floor El. 62Z-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NEJ Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Hair line cracks present. They are judged acceptable.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YZ NEIl UD1 N/AEII Y[ NO UD1 N/AD-]YE NDJ UD- N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-236 of 434 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ ND-1 UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-060 Equipment ID No. 22EDAC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 22 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y] NEI U-- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Matches SQUG (SEWS). 4 Clip angles welded to top plate which is anchor bolted into the concrete pedestal.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI uD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NDl uDl N/AD--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND UD-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD1 N/AD1 Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-237 of 434 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YE Ni I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-060 Equipment ID No. 22EDAC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 22 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEF- u iF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-H-2250, Rev 7, Diesel generator building general arrangement plan.9321-F-1461, Rev 10,Diesel generator building concrete foundation plan.AWC-011"IAG 6Xkg Oyaýd Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-16-2012 Steohen Yuan 10-16-2012 10-16-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-238 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ N[-- UrD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-060 Equipment ID No. 22EDAC Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 22 Photographs Note: EDG Starting Air Compressor

1. 22 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-239 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-061 Equipment ID No. 21MGS Equip. Class' 13 Equipment Description 21 MACHINE GENERATOR SET Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE ND UD- N/AD3 Y[ NO UD N/AD Surface corrosion on bolts and washers. Acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete pedestal is chipped on south-west corner. Judged not seismicly significant.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NDI uD N/AD I EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-240 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE Nn U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-061 Equipment ID No. 21MGS Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 21 MACHINE GENERATOR SET 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NEI UEi N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[Z NEI- UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Brick wall south and block wall south-west for battery room 22 are seismiclly qualified by Computech report No. R547.01..9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YO NEI UD- N/AD YN NDI UDl N/AD]Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-YN NO UD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-241 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YIE NI I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-061 Equipment ID No. 21MGS Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 21 MACHINE GENERATOR SET Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Some fluorescent bulbs need wire restraints in room. Floresent light south of equipment needs new balast per taped on sign. This is not a seismic issue for this component as component is a hard target but is a seismic good housekeeping practice.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks resolution of these issues.East side vent panel missing 2 of 10 cover bolts. Judged acceptable seismicly by walkdown team. CR IP2-2012-6134 tracks resolution of this issue.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-3052, Rev 38. Equipment arrangement control building.AWC-003 qlhý49 r 014ýýEvaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-10-2012 Steohen Yuan-ýz Wse ý -0) wit 10-10-2012 10-10-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-242 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NDI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-061 Equipment ID No. 21MGS Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 21 MACHINE GENERATOR SET Photographs Note: 21MACHINE GENERATOR SET Note: 21MACHINE GENERATOR SET EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-243 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NI 1 UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-062 Equipment ID No. 22MGS Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 22 MACHINE GENERATOR SET Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEI- NO No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YOZ NEI U0 N/AD YO NDI u-- N/AD-YE NDI uLID N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-244 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ NL] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-062 Equipment ID No. 22MGS Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 22 MACHINE GENERATOR SET 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NEil ULi N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since the anchorage configuration verification is not required.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[:] UEl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable tray support frame (over top of 22 MG SET) appears too close to the conduit west of the frame. The frame might interact with the conduit.Additionally the cable tray support frame does not appear to be seismically designed.

License basis evaluation LB-01 determined that the cable tray support as well as the gap between the conduit and cable tray support was seismically adequate.

CR IP2-2012-06498 was issued to hold the LBE. Refer to AWC-003 for area walk by. The concern is accepted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YN NEI UDJ N/A[D YZ NDI UD1 N/ADl Y[ ND] UED N/AD1 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-245 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NR UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-062 Equipment ID No. 22MGS Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 22 MACHINE GENERATOR SET 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN Nil ULi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE IJEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:9321-F-30523, Rev 50. Equipment arrangement control building.AWC-003_Date: 10/10/2012 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan qvlýg Nick Cris all-;ý ý.ý ý ---ý) qtz 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-246 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YEZ NDI UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-062 Equipment ID No. 22MGS Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 22 MACHINE GENERATOR SET Photographs Note: 22 MACHINE GENERATOR SET Note: OVERHEAD CABLE TRAY SUPPORT EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-247 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. EDDI Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description TRANSFER SWITCH Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NO The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Lock nuts connecting bottom unistrut to unistrut are not fully engaged with lock nut nylon. Acceptable as unistruts are welded together as called for on drawings.Cabinet door was opened and internal components and anchorage of internal components were examined and judged acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ NEJ UIE] N/A--Y ] N l u-I N/AD-]YO ND U0 NIAN Anchorage is to structural steel not to concrete.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-248 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NE Ul--i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. EDD1 Ec Equipment Description TRANSFER SWITCH 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 206651-9 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

luip. Class 1 14 YO NEI U[-] N/A[]YZ NE-I Ur-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YEZ NEI U[ NWAD" 8.. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U[:] N/AL[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO N[: UI:] N/ALj Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y] NRi- ULI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-249 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ ND] UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. EDD1 Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description TRANSFER SWITCH Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[l UI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:

A206651, Rev 9, Conduit layout control building elevation 15' and 33'A WC-002 qlA;ý(;r&64ýýEvaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-9-2012/ t Steohen Yuan I 10-9-2012 10-9-2012Dan Nutaq EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-250 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YIZ ND-] UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. EDD1 Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description TRANSFER SWITCH Photographs Note: Transfer switch Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-251 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YZ NFD UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. EDD2 Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description TRANSFER SWITCH Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NE]The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinet door opened. Intemals where examined and judged to be adequately anchored.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YN NEI U-- N/ADl Y[ NEI LIE N/A--Minor surface corrosion acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YM NDI U- N/AD--Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-252 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. EDD2 Ec Equipment Description TRANSFER SWITCH 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 206646.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 14 YE NEI UD- N/A--YE NEI uDI Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI UDJ N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDl UDl N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall is seismically qualified by computech report R547.01 per SQUG SEWS.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI UDl N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDJ UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-253 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NI I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. EDD2 Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description TRANSFER SWITCH Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI u-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

A206646, Rev 20, Conduit layout control building, elevation 15'-0" A WC-002 0 TlJýf9 61aI,-tj In : Nic~k Cri.snfll Date: 10-9-2012 Y -ýAýtýStP~nhe~n Yii:~n Stenhen Yuan 10-9-2012 10-9-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-254 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. EDD2 Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description TRANSFER SWITCH Photographs Note: Transfer Switch Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-255 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y7-- NI UNI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-067 Equipment ID No. EDC1 Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description STATIC INV. #23 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinet shall be opened to inspect attachment of internal components to the cabinet. Cabinet can not be opened when powered.Anchorage external to cabinet checked and found to be free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

External anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?External anchorage is free of significant visible cracks in the masonry wall near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[-- NE YD- NDI UN N/ADI Y[ N[] UD N/AD YM NDI U[-- N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-256 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YO-l NOi UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-067 Equipment ID No. EDC1 Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description STATIC INV. #23 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YF-l NOi U-I N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE-I NE U[potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Cabinet need to be opened to inspect attachment of internal components to the cabinet. Cabinet can not be opened when powered.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures..

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall is seismiclly qualified by Computech report No. R547. 01.Fluorescent bulbs need to be secured to fixtures with wires. CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie florescent bulb to fixture. It is judged the hard target inverter will remain operable if the florescent bulbs were to fall on it.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YE NE UE N/AE]YIE N[ uE] N/A['-YE NE U- N/AO YE NE uE EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-257 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YO-- NO] UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-067 Equipment ID No. EDC1 Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description STATIC INV. #23 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nr-I U[-Ii adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:

A206648, Rev 46, Conduit layout Control building, elev. 33' plan west half AWC-004ýqýEvaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/11/12 qlAý49~/6~~gu Nirk (r.rkioq.ll 10/11/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-258 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y- NEil UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-067 Equipment ID No. EDC1 Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description STATIC INV. #23 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH Photographs Note: STATIC INV #23 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-259 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y[Z Nr-D UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. BATT21 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 21 Battery Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD-- NE The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NO UOl N/AD Y[ ND ul N/AD YE ND UD-' N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-260 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YER NEI U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. BATT21 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NDI UL- N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UDýpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Block wall is seismiclly qualified by Computech report No. R547.01.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

This is judged as a non seismic issue as bulbs falling would not render the hard target batteries inoperable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Y[ NEI UiE N/AD Y[ NDI Ui- N/AD-YE NDI uDl N/AD-YE NDI uDýEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-261 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YIZ NF U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. BATT21 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEil UlI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:

9321-F-3052, Rev 38. Equipment arrangement control room.A WC-006 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/10/12 qllo CXer Nick Crisoell--ý ýý ý -0) mrz 10/10/12 10/10/102 Dan Nita EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-262 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. BATT21 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Photographs No photo due to restriction of EN-DC-217.

Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-263 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. BATT22 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 22 Battery Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YO NO YZ N[I UD- N/AD YE NDl UDI N/AD-'YO NDl UEID N/ADl Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-264 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ NF] UE--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. BATT22 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NE] ULI N/A[Z (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] uE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN NE] UE] N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE] UE] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs need to be secured with wires. CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture. It isjudged the batteries (hard target) would remain operable if the fluorescent bulbs fall.Block wall is seismically qualified by Computech report No. R547.01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UE] N/AEI Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UIE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-265 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ N-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. BATT22 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[i- U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Loose steel member (12" long) found under the battery rack. CR IP2-2012-06510 tracks resolution This is a non-seismic issue.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building.AWC-005 Date: 10/10,2012 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Nick Crispell D Nuta 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-266 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZE NI 1 U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. BATT22 Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Photographs No photo due to restriction of EN-DC-217 Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-267 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NR Ui--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-070 Equipment ID No. BATT23 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area BATTERY ROOM 23 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NEJ Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor coated. No visible concrete cracks observed.'Enter the equipment class name fi-om EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NEI U-l N/AD YN NEI U-- N/A[-YN NO U-- N/A--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-268 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NDl UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-070 Equipment ID No. BATT23 Ec Equipment Description BATTERY BANK 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing M-10398, M-10397, TMC53813, and SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

uip. Class 1 15 YE NEI ul N/ADI YE NEI UDl Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NDl UD-I N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI U-I N/A[: and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block walls of concern are qualified by SQUG (SEWS).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.Yr NDj UDl N/AD1 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI uD]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-269 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ ND] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-070 Equipment ID No. BATT23 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R NEI UIF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

One overhead light is burnt out. This is a non-seismic issue. CR IP2-2012-06510 issued to resolve.

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:

9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building.AWC-015 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Evalate by:Nic Cri~el Dat: 1-17-0 1 Date: 10-17-2012 10-17-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-270 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YEZ NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-070 Equipment ID No. BATT23 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Photographs Note: Battery rack 23 looking south-east.

Note: Battery rack 23 looking south-west.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-271 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-070 Equipment ID No. BATT23 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK IP2 Status: Y[E Ni-- Ur-I Equip. Class 1 15 Note: Typical baseplate and anchor bolts.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-272 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NEI UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. BATT24 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area 24 Battery Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE] NE No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YN NDI U1 N/AD YN NO U-- N/A-]YE NDI UD1 N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-273 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YN ND UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. BATT24 Eq Equipment Description BATTERY BANK 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

luip. Class 1 15 YDI NI U0I N/AE Y[ ND uEi-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Block wall is seismically qualified by Computech report No. R547.01.There is a 1" gap between block and a perpendicular block wall. The gap was judged large enough to prevent seismic pounding of the two walls by the walk down team.Y[ NDI uDl N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NDI UD- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

One light is out. This is not a seismic concern. CR IP2-2012-06351 issued for tracking purposes.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YN NDI UDI N/AD-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[E NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-274 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NF Ui Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. BATT24 Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

A206640, Rev 10, Arrangement of equipment in cable spread room elevation 33'-0" AWC-016-X Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/10/2012 qlhý49&6k,,40ýNick Crispell Vcýýý ý -0)mr 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 Ntita Draryos Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-275 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ ND U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. BATT24 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY BANK Photographs No photo due to restriction of EN-DC-217 Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-276 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YD NEIl UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. M19 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 21 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y NEI-Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NEIl U-I N/A[l]YO NEI uLI N/A[-]YE NEI UE- N/A0 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-277 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YOI NOl! UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. M19 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YE NO UOi N/A[Anchorage matches drawing 01 ID13800.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YE NO EUE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Gap between the cabinet and adjacent frame west of the cabinet is 0,5". This seismic seperation requires analysis to determine adequacy.LB-08 was performed to resolve.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Floresent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinet will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie florescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

Masonry block wall is seismically qualified by Computech Report no.R54 7.01 as discussed in SQUG SEWS.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YO NO UE[ N/AE YE NEI U[-- N/A[YO N- UE- N/AEI EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-278 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YEI NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. M19 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 21 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y-- NEil UI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Internals of cabinet could not be examined at time of inspection per OPS personnel as cabinet was active.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIE N-- UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

A206640, Rev 10. Arrangement of equipment in cable spreading room, elev. 33'01ID 13800, Rev 7. Outline for the battery charger 22,24,21 and 23.A WC-004 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/11/2012 qviýg r 016kýp Nick CrisDell 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-279 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YEI Nn U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. M19 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 21 Photographs Note: Battery charger 21 is cabinet on right Note: Battery charger 21 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-280 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. M19 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 21 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YO-- NE] US Equip. Class 1 16 Note: Battery charger 21 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-281 of 434 ATTACHM EF Sheet 1 of IT 9.6 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YEI- NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. EGA3 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 24 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage of internal components to cabinet could not be inspected as operations is not allowed to open cabinet when cabinet is powered.Cabinet is to be powered down, opened and internals inspected.

Anchorage of cabinet to concrete floor is external to cabinet and was inspected.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.YI- NO UH N/ALI Y[] N[-] U-] N/ADJ Y[ NI uLID N/AL Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-282 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y-I NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. EGA3 Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 24 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NEI uLI N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

One Hilti anchor bolt is 3/8" diameter not Y 2 per DWG 01 ID13800-7.

Smaller anchor bolt was documented by SQUG (SEWS) and is therfore seismically acceptable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YIE N[] U--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[ NEI U[-- N/AEI Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NE] UE] N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall is qualified by computech report no. R547.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NE] UE- N/AU Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NE] UE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-283 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y-I NIZ UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. EGA3 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 24 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI Uli-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:011D13800, Rev 7, Outline for battery charger 22,24,21 & 23 A206640, Rev 10, Arrangement of equipment in cable spreading room elev. 33'AWC-004)qýýEvaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/11/2012 qýý61,,ý,r Nick Crispell 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-284 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y-I N-- UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. EGA3 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 24 Photographs Note: 3/8" anchor on north-west corner Note: North-east corner EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-285 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YEI- NEI UN!Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. EGAI Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #21 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage of internal components to cabinet could not be inspected as operations is not allowed to open cabinet when cabinet is powered.Cabinet is to be powered down, opened and internals inspected.

Anchorage of cabinet to concrete floor is external to cabinet and was inspected.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NEI YEI] NE] UO N/AEI YM NE] UI-] N/AE YE NE] UE- N/A[Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-286 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YD] NEI] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. EGAI E(Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches description provided in SQUG (SEWS) and DWG 011D13800-7.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 16 YO NEI U[- N/A[:]YE NEI uE]Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NE] UEi NIAE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE N[] UII N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall qualified by computech report no. R54 7. 01 per SQUG (SEWS).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI U[I N/AE]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YED NE] UE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-287 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YEI NEI- UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. EGA1 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[] N[l UPi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:

A206640, Rev 10, arrangement of equipment in cable spreading room elev. 33'.A WC-004 qlhý49 CXgi Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/11/2012 Stenhpn Ytin 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-288 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YEI NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. EGAI Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #21 Photographs Note: Cabinet Note: North west anchor EN-DC-168 REV 0