NL-12-167, Indian Point, Unit 2, Enclosure to NL-12-167 Seismic Walkdown Report - Page D-69 of 203 Through End

Indian Point, Unit 2, Enclosure to NL-12-167 Seismic Walkdown Report - Page D-69 of 203 Through End

ML12346A343
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	11/20/2012
From:	Huebsch P Enercon Services
To:	Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-167 IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0
Download: ML12346A343 (218)

Text

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-69 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 8 1P2 Status: Y[ NE] UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-013 Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5'-9" Room, Area' Zem Strainer Pit SWEL Components:

SWELl -001, 002 & 088 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NE] UIE] N/AE]-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Heater and speaker in corner judged to be adequately supported.

No other seismic anchorage issues.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Mild surface corrosion observed.

Judged acceptable.

Y[ NEI] UE N/AE-3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YE NE]I UIE N/AE]Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.,If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-70 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 8 1P2 Status: YE NEI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-013 Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5-9" Room, Area'Zem Strainer Pit SWEL Components:

SWELl -001, 002 & 088 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI] UD N/AEl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Numerous service water pipes, valves, strainers, etc. are in the area.They are connected with a mix of welding and bolted flanges. They are all judged to be adequately supported to preclude seismic induced flooding and/or spray in the area.There is one threaded pipe on the north wall for the 26 sump pump discharge.

This threaded pipe is judged adequately supported to preclude leakage and/or spray caused by a seismic event.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it does appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NDI uDl N/AD YE NDI UD1 N/AD-7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Tools, gloves, wire ties, and a loose lock is left scattered around the room. These are not seismic concerns given location of items.CR IP2-2012-06644 issued to resolve.YE NEI UD1 N/ADl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-71 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 8 1P2 Status: YE NEIl u-'Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-013 Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5-9" Room, Area'Zern Strainer Pit SWEL Components:

SWELI -001, 002 & 088 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEIl UI-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWN-625-X3 22SWP Equalizing valve DPI-5001-S shows white salt crystals (see photo below).CR IP2-2012-06647 issued to track resolution.

References:

CR IP2-2012-06644 CR IP2-2012-06647 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-17-2012 Dan Nuta 10-17-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-72 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 8 IP2 Status: YE NEI U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-013 Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5'-9" Room, Area'Zem Strainer Pit SWEL Components:

SWELl-001, 002 & 088 Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-73 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 8 IP2 Status: YO NEI- Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-013 Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5-9" Room, Area'Zem Strainer Pit SWEL Components:

SWELl-001, 002 & 088 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-74 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 8 IP2 Status: YN Nr-] UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-013 Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5-9" Room, Area' Zem Strainer Pit SWEL Components:

SWEL1-001.

002 & 088 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-75 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 8 1P2 Status: YE NR UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-013 Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5'-9" Room, Area' Zem Strainer Pit SWEL Components:

SWELl-001, 002 & 088 Threaded pipe for the 26 sump pump discharge.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-76 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 8 of 8 1P2 Status: YE NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-013 Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5-9" Room, Area' Zem Strainer Pit SWEL Components:

SWELl-001, 002 & 088 Note: Salt crystals found on SWN-Equalizing valve DPI-5001-S.

Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-77 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YO NR UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-014 Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -030 & 031 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YN N uD N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Mild surface corrosion observed.

Judged acceptable.

Floor is epoxy coated 2" thick in some places to slope area for drainage so condition of concrete below cannot be accessed.

No significant cracks where noted in the epoxy that would suggest significant cracks in the concrete.

The epoxy did show general chipping and flaking.Judged acceptable.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y[ ND UD N/AD YE ND uD N/AD Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-78 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEI UiýArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-014 Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 15"-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELL -030 & 031 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NDI ULI N/ADI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?The area is an outdoor environment.

As such SSCs are designed to be rained and snowed on so they would not be affected by getting wet.YE NDI UD1 N/A--6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YO NDI UD- N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A bag of trash was left against the fence, and other scattered trash was found as well as a loose bolt not attached to anything.

See photos below. CR IP2-2012-06649 issued to track resolution.

YE NDI uD1 N/ADl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-79 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI UI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-014 Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl-030

& 031 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Service water pump 24 has an FME cover left in place on a pipe, and the heat tracing wires appear to be disconnected and not on the pipe. Other service water pumps have this pipe surrounded by heat tracing, insulation, and flashing.

CR IP2-2012-06652 issued to track resolution.

References CR IP2-2012-06649 CR IP2-2012-06652 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-17-2012 Dan Nuta 10-17-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-80 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI U-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-014 Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl-030

& 031 Photographs Note: Trash bag left in area with a loose bolt lying on top.Note: FME cover left on pipe to service water pump 24.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-81 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEI UI-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-014 Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl-030

& 031 Note: Example of the same pipe connected to identical service water pumps in the area. They are heat traced, insulated, and flashed.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-82 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 1P2 Status: YEZ NEI Lur-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-015 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 BATTERY ROOM 23 SWEL Components:

SWELl -070 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YE Nil UiD N/A--2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

YN NDJ UD7 N/AD1 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y[Z NE] U[: N/ADýYes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-83 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 1P2 Status: YN NDI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-015 Location:

Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33'-0" Room,Area 1 BATTERYROOM 23 SWEL Components:

SWELl -070 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UD- N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YE NDI uDl N/AD1 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NDI uDl N/AD1 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

YE NDI uDl N/ADl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-84 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: YZ NR- uF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-015 Location:

Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33'-0" Room,Area 1 BATTERYROOM23 SWEL Components:

SWELl -070 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE ULI[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Coating on floor cracked and scratched.

Does not pose a seismic issue.One light bulb overhead is out. CR IP2-2012-06510 issued to track resolution.

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell " " Date: 10-17-2012 Dan Nuta 10-17-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-85 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YEZ NEI UI--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-01 5 Location:

Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33'-0" Room,Area 1 BATTERYROOM23 SWEL Components:

SWELl -070 Photographs ioxe; vaurery raCK -3.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-86 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 1P2 Status: Y[ NEI Ur--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-01 5 Location:

Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33'-O" Room,Area 1 BATTERYROOM23 SWEL Components:

SWELl -070 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-87 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Status: YN NIl UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-015 Location:

Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 BATTERYROOM23 SWEL Components:

SWELl -070 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-88 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YO NM- ULM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-016 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 24 Battery Room SWEL Components:

SWELI-071 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEil U[-] N/All potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

Y[ NEL UE- N/AL]3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YEE ND- U-] N/AO]Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-89 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YiZ NE I UEI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-016 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 24 Battery Room SWEL Components:

SWELI-071 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U- N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Two light fixtures are in room both have screw in bulbs and glass screw in domes around the bulb. One has a cage around the glass dome and one does not. The cage is not required since the glass dome is screwed in and judged not to fall during a seismic event.No seismic concern.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YE N-] uF- N/AD 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YZ ND UDI N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

Y[ NEI UD-- N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-90 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ NEI UI--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-016 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 24 Battery Room SWEL Components:

SWELl-071 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEE NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No comments on seismic issues Evaluated by: Nick Crispell "" " Ii L Date: 10/10/2012 Stephen Yuan 10/10/2012 Dan Nuta 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-91 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI urI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-016 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-O" Room, Area 1 24 Battery Room SWEL Components:

SWELI-071 Photographs Note: Pictures could not be taken while meeting the procedural camera standoff requirements.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-92 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 6 1P2 Status: YZ NI-- U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-017 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-O" Room, Area 1 Safety Iniection Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -020, 090 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Support stanchion for the overhead trolley has a four hole base plate but only three bolts are installed.

All other similar stanchions have four bolts installed in the base plates. Per signage on stanchion the anchor is abandoned in accordance with FEI-840679.

Also refer to LB-05.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

Y[I NE U-1 N/AD Y ] N[l U-] N/A[: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YI-- NE Ui- N/AL HVAC ductwork adjacent to the stairs does not have any lateral support from the base to beyond the first elbow at the top. The span appears to be excessive.

LB-14 has been issued to resolve.'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-93 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 IP2 Status: YS NEI UI--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-017 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-0" Room, Area 1 Safety Iniection Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -020, 090 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN ND UrI- N/AEl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.Valve CCW 749C (SI Pump 21 Circ Pump Sup Stop) hand wheel rubs insulation along west wall of room near end of 21 SI pump. The insulation is starting to show signs of damage due to the rubbing.Judged not to be a seismic issue given softness of insulation.

CR IP2-2012-06576 issued to track resolution.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YE NE-] UL N/A[D 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NI U[-j N/A[D EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-94 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: YS NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-017 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-O" Room, Area 1 Safety Injection Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -020, 090 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEI NE ul- N/AE]interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladders stored near the stair are secured by chains. However, the ladders are tall and the chain is relatively low on the ladders making it likely that the ladders could tip and impact equipment during a seismic event. See photo. CR IP2-2012-6581 is written to evaluate this condition.

Revisited the area on 10/23/2012 and found 2 Trash bags are loose in the area near the corner, south of pump 21 and one light bulb blown out over the safety injection pump no. 21. CR IP2-2012-06581 is written to remove trash bags.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NR U[-E adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

CR IP2-2012-06581 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19 & 10/23/2012 Kirit Parikh 10/23/2012 Paul Huebsch 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-95 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YE Nni U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-017 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59"-O" Room, Area 1 Safety Iniection Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -020. 090 Photographs Note: Trolley stanchion with missing anchor bolt. Note: Trolley stanchion with missing anchor bolt.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-96 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 1P2 Status: YO Nr-] UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-017 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-0" Room, Area 1 Safety Iniection Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -020, 090 Note: Duct work with excessive span between Note: Duct work with excessive span between supports.

supports.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-97 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI-- UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-017 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-0" Room, Area 1 Safety Injection Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -020, 090 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-98 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 1P2 Status: YO NEI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-018 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-0" Room, Area' CCWPump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -023 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchor for CCW pipe support missing 2 of 4 anchor bolts. Missing anchor bolts are tagged with an old work order WRT IP2-05-0522 from 2005. The pipe support with missing anchor bolts is analyzed in LB-04.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

YEI NO ULIJ N/AD1 YO NEI U-- N/A[3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YO NEI U-- N/A--Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-99 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 IP2 Status: YEE NEI UEZ-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-018 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-0" Room,Area 1 CCW Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -023 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescent bulbs need restraint wires to secure them to the light fixture. CR IP2-2012-06614 issued to track resolution.

YDI NE UD7 N/AD-5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.Y[ NDI U-- N/AD-6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.Y[ NDI uD- N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Oil catch bucket on 22 CCW Pump not secured. Not a seismic concern.CR IP2-2012-06617 issued to secure bucket to prevent an oil spill.YN NDI u~l N/ADl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-100 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI U[--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-018 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-0" Room,Area' CCW Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -023 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[--1 NE UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?23 Sump pump missing all bolts on float rod guide. CR IP2-2012-06616 issued to track resolution.

Lack of bolts could jam the float and cause the sump pump to malfunction.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Oil is leaking onto the floor near 23 CCW Pump bed drain. CR IP2-2012-06615 issued to track resolution.

Conduit overhead to 23 CCW pump appears to be missing Appendix R fire proofing wrap in three places. Consultation with the Fire Protection Engineer determined that the intermittent insulation on the subject conduit is actually fire protection insulation for the support for another fire protected line.Therefore, there is no missing insulation.

References:

CR IP2-2012-06615 CR IP2-2012-06616 CR IP2-2012-06617 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-19-2012 Paul Huebsch 10-19-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-101 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-018 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-0" Room, Area 1 CCW Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl-023 Photographs rOze; t-ipe suppon Tor ,uvv missing two ancnor bolts. Existing work order tag is WRT IP2-05-0522.

Note: Pump 23 CCW pump is leaking oil onto the floor.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-102 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI U-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-018 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-0" Room, Area 1 CCW Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -023 Sump Pump missing bolts on the float Note: 23 Sump Pump missing bolts on the float rod guide.roa guiae.EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-103 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI UD7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-018 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-O" Room, Area 1 CCWPump Room SWEL Components:

SWELl -023 Note: Oil catch bucket on 22 CCW Pump is not secured to anything.

Can slide and tip over in a seismic event.Note: EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-104 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 1P2 Status: YEZ NDI UD]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-019 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68' Room, Area 1 Primary Water Make-up Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWEL2-001

& SWELl -027 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Y[ ND-- UD-- N/AD--2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

YE NDI U- N/A[D]3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y[ NDI UD N/A--Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-105 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 1P2 Status: Y[Z NDI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-019 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68' Room, Area 1 Primary Water Make-up Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWEL2-001

& SWELl -027 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI ULI N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.Y[ NDI UD1 N/AD1 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.Y[ NDI U[D N/AD-7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffold with a red "unsafe" tag spans over the 21 Containment Spray Pump. Scaffold is missing a brace in the east/west direction.

CR IP2-2012-06578 issued to resolve.YDI NO uD-- N/AD: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-106 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-019 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68' Room, Area 1 Primary Water Make-up Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWEL2-001

& SWELl -027 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI u j adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

CR IP2-2012-06578 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell " Date: 10/19/2012 Paul Huebsch 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-107 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YN NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-019 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68' Room, Area 1 Primary Water Make-up Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWEL2-001

& SWELl -027 Photographs Note: View of pump Note: View of pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-108 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 1P2 Status: YE NEI Ui--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-019 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68' Room, Area 1 Primary Water Make-up Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWEL2-001

& SWELl -027 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-109 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-019 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68' Room, Area 1 Primary Water Make-up Pump Room SWEL Components:

SWEL2-001

& SWELl -027 Note: Anchor bolt Note: View of pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037.

Rev. 0, Page D-110 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 1P2 Status: YN ND UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location:

Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWEL2-005, 006 & 007 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Y[ NEI UD- N/A--2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

YE NDI UDJ N/AD 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YO ND UD- N/AD HVAC duct on north end of building not fixed at bottom. Total riser height is approximately 20' and only lateral support is at top. Shorter ducts nearby are braced. This HVAC duct falling would not be a seismic concern as it is too light to cause damage to the spent fuel pool that could cause rapid drain down. CR IP2-2012-06661 issued to track resolution.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-1 11 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 1P2 Status: YM NDI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location:

Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWEL2-005, 006 & 007 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ ND-] UD- N/A--spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YN NDI UD- N/ADl 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.Y[ NDI uDl N/AD-7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Roll of tape loose on girt, white board attached with tape, 2nd white board not attached, chair left loose, rolls of plastic left standing on end.Area needs a good housekeeping go through. These and other housekeeping issues found are not seismic concerns.CR IP2-2012-06662 issued to track resolution.

YE NDI uD- N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-112 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ui]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location:

Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWEL2-005, 006 & 007 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEil Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

CR IP2-2012-06661 CR IP2-2012-06662 Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch Date: 10-19-2012 Nick Cdrspell 10-19-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-113 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEIl ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location:

Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWEL2-005, 006 & 007 Photographs Note: HVAC duct on north wall of FSB is supported at top only. The shorter HVAC duct to the left is supported at top and bottom.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D- 114 of 203 A'TACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI U-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location:

Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWEL2-005, 006 & 007 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-115 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ur-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location:

Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area'SWEL Components:

SWEL2-005, 006 & 007 Note: Items left loose in comer, chair and plastic rolls standing Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-116 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 1P2 Status: YE NEI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-021 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80-O" Room, Area 1 23 Charging Pump SWEL Components:

SWELl -026 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YE N[D] UD- N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

YO N[D UD N/AD--3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YN ND I UDI N/AD I Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-117 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 1P2 Status: YE NEI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-021 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 23 Char.ing Pump SWEL Components:

SWELl -026 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UI- N/A[:]spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.Y[ ND uD N/ADl 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YO ND UDl N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

YN NDI uD N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-118 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 1P2 Status: Y[ NE[-I UF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-021 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 23 Charging Pump SWEL Components:

SWELl -026 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI- UIE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No more seismic concems.Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch (I Date: 10-19-2012 Nick Crispell C 4 tz 10-19-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-119 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-021 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 23 Charging Pump SWEL Components:

SWELl -026 Photographs Note: Note: EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-120 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NE] Ur--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-021 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 23 Chanrging Pump SWEL Components:

SWELl -026 Note: 23 Charging pump room looking north when you first walk inside the door.Note: Overhead of looking south-east.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-121 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ur-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-021 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 23 Changing Pump SWEL Components:

SWELl -026 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-122 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 1P2 Status: YZ NEI UD1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80' Room, Area 1 Main Hallway & Common Area (east side)SWEL Components:

SWELl -025 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YIZ NDI UD N/AD1 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

Y[ ND U- N/AD 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YO NDI UD N/AD Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is veryilarge (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-123 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 IP2 Status: YO NEI U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80' Room, Area' Main Hallway & Common Area (east side)SWEL Components:

SWELl-025 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO-- N[ U- N/A--spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescent light tubes need to be restrained.

CR IP2-2012-06663 has been issued to remedy this condition.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Unit heater 232 hot water piping appear not seismically supported.

LB-06 was performed to analyze this condition.

YO] NO ULO N/A[L]6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NO U-- N/AL]7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Tool cart is tied off but all tools are loose on top of cart and could be displaced in a seismic event. There was an unsecured ladder, various equipment and miscellaneous items loose on a grating which was tagged "seismically sensitive area". CR IP2-2012-06664 issued to track resolution.

YEI NO U-- N/Al]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-124 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: ND- UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80' Room, Area 1 Main Hallway & Common Area (east side)SWEL Components:

SWELl -025 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yr NEI uL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

CR IP2-2012-06663 CR IP2-2012-06664 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19/2012 Paul Huebsch 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-125 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YZ Nn U-II Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80' Room, Area 1 Main Hallway & Common Area (east side)SWEL Components:

SWELl -025 Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-126 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 1P2 Status: YE N[1 U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80' Room, Area' Main Hallway & Common Area (east side)SWEL Components:

SWELl -025 Note: Area heater piping. -ipe ot concern is the galvanized pipe that parallels the building cross bracing plane.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-127 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 1P2 Status: YEZ NEI UiI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80' Room, Area 1 Main Hallway & Common Area (east side)SWEL Components:

SWELl -025 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-128 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 7 1P2 Status: YN NDI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area' Main Hallway SWEL Components:

SWELl -006, 008. 010, 092, 093. 098, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YN NDI UDl N/ADl 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Minor surface rusting on some components.

Judged acceptable.

YO ND:] U-- N/ADl 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YE NDI UDI N/AD-Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-129 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 7 1P2 Status: YN Nr I UD-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area 1 Main Hallway SWEL Components:

SWELl -006, 008, 010, 092, 093, 098, 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDl U[-l N/ALI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescent bulb need to be wire tied to light fixture. Some fluorescent bulbs are over top of the MCC Cabinets and are not in accordance with good seismic practices.

CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

Not considered a seismic concern since targets are not soft.No more seismic or other issue.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YE NEI uD1 N/ADl 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YN NEI url N/AD1 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladder not secured and batching tools left loose on boric acid batching tank platform.

A load (barrel lifting apparatus) is left hanging on hook of the overhead trolley. Items could fall over or swing affecting components in the area. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to resolve.Scaffolding in area is seismically installed and inspected per scaffolding tag.YED NE UD' N/ADI EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-130 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 7 IP2 Status: YE N[ UI--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-O" Room, Area' Main Hallway SWEL Components:

SWELl -006, 008. 010, 092, 093. 098, 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NO UI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Ladder safety chain left unattached on Component Cooling Surge Tank platform ladder. This is not a seismic issue. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued for tracking.Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-131 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 7 IP2 Status: YE NEIl U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area 1 Main Hallway SWEL Components:

SWELl -006, 008, 010, 092, 093, 098, Photographs Note: Tools left loose near confined space rescue gear area. CR IP2-2012-06359 issued to track resolution.

Note: Ladder safety chain kept unattached on Component Cooling Surge Tank platform ladder.CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No, IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-132 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 7 IP2 Status: YE NEI UE--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area 1 Main Hallway SWEL Components:

SWELl -006, 008. 010, 092, 093. 098.IL NOte: Wire len hanging loose on a overhead conduit located in the north east corner of the room (Wall west of 22 Boric Acid Tank). CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

Note: Abandoned conduit left hanging loose. I IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-133 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 7 IP2 Status: YE NEI UF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area 1 Main Hallway SWEL Components:

SWELl -006, 008, 010, 092. 093. 098.Note: Tools left leading in comer of Boric Acid Batching platform.

CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

Note: Ladder left unsecured on Boric Acid Batching platform.

CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-134 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 7 IP2 Status: Y[ NM UI--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area 1 Main Hallway SWEL Components:

SWELl -006, 008, 010, 092, 093, 098, Note: Barrel handling apparatus left hanging on the overhead trolley. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

Note: Ladder and other items left unsecured to a ladder rack that is not secured to the floor. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-135 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ NEI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-024 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-O" Room, Area 1 MCC Room SWEL Components:

SWELl-007

& 009 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YE NDI UI- N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

YN NDl U- N/AD--3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y[ ND] UDI N/AD-Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-136 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-024 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area' MCC Room SWEL Components:

SWELl-007

& 009 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YLI NO ULi N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Florescent bulbs need wire securing them to the light fixture. Florescent lights with no safety wires are contrary to good seismic practice and must be secured to the fixture. Some bulbs are over top of the MCC Cabinets and could affect the MCC's functionality if they fall during a seismic event. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YM NEI UD1 N/AD-6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YIE ND] UDI N/AD-7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8' Ladder left unsecured behind west side of MCC 26BB. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

Tool box on wheels left on secured on east side of MCC 26BB. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

Pliers left on top of the 120 Volt Distribution Panel #2. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

YDI NO uD- N/A--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-137 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NEI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-024 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area 1 MCC Room SWEL Components:

SWELl-007

& 009 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEl- No U-il adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?All cover screws (2 of 2) on south side of EPF9, EPG1, EPF7, & EPF8 are either not tightly secured or completely missing. One of these has the latch handle turned differently than the others meaning one panel door is free to swing open. CR IP2-2012-06355 issued to track resolution.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No more seismic concems.Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-138 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NE] U-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-024 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area 1 MCC Room SWEL Components:

SWELl-007

& 009 Photographs Note: Picture of one MCC in the room. Oth pictures could not be taken in room due to procedural requirement for camera standoff Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-139 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NEI UIM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-O" Room, Area 1 Non-Regenerative HX Cubical SWEL Components:

SWELl-085, 097 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NDi UD-- N/ADl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

YN NDI UD- N/A--3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YE NDI UD] N/AD-'Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions., If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-140 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ ND- UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area 1 Non-Regenerative HX Cubical SWEL Components:

SWELl -085, 097 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI ULIE N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YM NDI uD- N/AD-6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NDI UDJ N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

At the north end of the room, a power cord is plugged in, rolled up on the floor, and then draped over components as it powers a device near the non-regenerative heat exchanger.

This is not a seismic concern. CR IP2-2012-06778 issued to track resolution.

YN NDI UD N/AD1 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-141 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NEI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98-0" Room, Area 1 Non-Regenerative HXCubical SWEL Components:

SWELl -085, 097 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE-I UI-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

CR IP2-2012-06778 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell .Date: 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-142 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NR U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-O" Room, Area' Non-Regenerative HXCubical SWEL Components:

SWELl -085, 097 Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-143 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98"-O" Room, Area' Non-Regenerative HX Cubical SWEL Components:

SWELl -085, 097 Note: General view of exchanger.

Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-144 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YO NFD U[D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15' Room, Area 1 RHR CELL 21 SWEL Components:

SWELl-028 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YZ N[-] U[:] N/AL]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

Y[ NEI U-] N/A[L 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YO NI uM] N/AE]Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-145 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEIr UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15' Room, Area 1 RHR CELL 21 SWEL Components:

SWEL1 -028 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NR UI- N/A[: spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YO NE] U[-] N/A[l 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE N[E] U[:] N/AEi 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

One light bulb is blown out over the RHR pump. Called lights out hotline ext 7600. Not a seismic issue.YE NE] UE] N/A[:]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-146 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YO NEI ul-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15' Room, Area 1 RHR CELL 21 SWEL Components:

SWELl -028 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI[ Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/23/2012 qlhý49 r&64ýýNink r.ri.moll 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-147 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YIE NEI] U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15' Room, Area 1 RHR CELL 21 SWEL Components:

SWELl -028 Photographs Note: Clean area and well secured entities around Note: area EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-148 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15' Room, Area' RHR CELL 21 SWEL Components:

SWELl -028 Note: HVAC duct on the wall well secured.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-149 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YIZ NEI UMil Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-027 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15' Room, Area' RHR CELL 22 SWEL Components:

SWELl -029 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI UEi- N/AE]potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

Y[ NEI UDl N/AE]3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YN NEI UE- N/AE--Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-150 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NDI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-027 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15' Room, Area 1 RHR CELL 22 SWEL Components:

SWELl -029 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD: N/AD--spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YN NDI U-- N/ADl 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.Y[ NDI U[D N/ADl 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A loose plastic bag and a plastic funnel are lying on the floor. Not a seismic issue. CR IP2-2012-06747 has been written to resolve this condition.

YN NDI uDl N/ADl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-151 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ NO UFI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-027 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15' Room, Area' RHR CELL 22 SWEL Components:

SWELl-029 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN Nil ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

CR IP2-2012-06747 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/23/2012 Nick Crispell 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-152 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YN NI- Ui--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-027 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15' Room, Area 1 RHR CELL 22 SWEL Components:

SWELl -029 Photographs Note: riuw; -taIsLIG oegn mne noor EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0. Page D-153 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YN NR UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-028 Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 67-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl-038

& 039 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YE NDI UDl N/A--2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

YOZ NDI UD1 N/ADl 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YN NDI UD N/A-Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-154 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NO U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-028 Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 67'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -038 & 039 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.YE NEI UE NIAEII 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.Y[ NEI UD N/AL]6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NEI ur N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

YIZ ND UD N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-155 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEI ID-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-028 Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 67'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl-038

& 039 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NDl UiD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Florescent lights in the area need to be tied to the light fixtures with wire ties. Not a seismic issue.CR IP2-2012-06741 issued for tracking.

References:

CR IP2-2012-06741 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-24-2012 Kirit Parikh 10-24-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-156 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-028 Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 67-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl-038

& 039 Photographs Note: Motor operator for 21RCP Seal Injection Line Isolation valve 250A (SWELI-038).

Valve 250A is located below on EL. 51' connected by reach rod to this motor operator.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-157 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEI U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-028 Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 67'-6" Room, Area'SWEL Components:

SWELl-038

& 039 Note: Valve Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-158 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE NDI UFD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 51'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -038, 040. 041 & 042 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Y] NI U-EI N/AD1 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

Y[ NDJ U[- N/A[--3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YE NDI UDl N/ADl Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-159 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NDI UI--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 51'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -038, 040. 041 & 042 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI Ui N/AD1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.There are numerous places with small separations between items as area is very congested.

All occurrences were judged acceptable for seismic issues.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YN NDI UD7 N/A-6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NDI uD7 N/AD1 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Multiple long term scaffolds are present in the area. They are tagged as engineering approved and are judged seismically acceptable.

Pliers and other items are left lying in area. All are judged acceptable given location.Lead shielding in the area is judged acceptable.

YN NDI uD- N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-160 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NO U[i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 51'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -038, 040, 041 & 042 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NW:] LID adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-24-2012 Kirit Parikh 10-24-2012 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-161 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 51'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -038, 040, 041 & 042 Photographs Note: Clear hose rolled up on scaffolding.

Judged acceptable given soft hose and targets in the area.Note: Pliers left lying in area. Judged acceptable given location.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-162 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEI JuD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-030 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 80'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -091 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Y[ ND ID-- N/ADl 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

YO ND-- UE1 N/AD-3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y[ ND uD N/AFD Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-163 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEI UMi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-030 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -091 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UM N/AW-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Florescent bulbs need wire ties securing bulbs to fixtures in area. This is seismically acceptable as location of unsecured bulbs will not render equipment inoperable.

CR IP2-2012-06741 issued to track resolution.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.Y[ NWI UW1 N/AW I 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YEE NEI UIW- N/AW1 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Fire extinguisher is on a bracket with a very small pin keeping fire extinguisher on bracket. Judged acceptable as vertical g is less than I in the area.Y[ NEI UW1 N/AW1 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-164 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NO UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-030 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -091 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Two lights are burnt out in the area. Called lights out hotline at ext 7600.

References:

CR IP2-2012-06741 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-24-2012 Kirit Parikh 10-24-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-165 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI ULI7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-030 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 80'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -091 Photographs Note: Lenerai area Or wak aown.Note: I-ire extinguisner on a pin oracKet.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-166 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI UI--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-030 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl-091 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-167 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE NDI uDI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-031 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area' PLENUM SWEL Components:

SWELl -048 & 049 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Y[ NI UI-l N/A[-D 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

YO NEI UDl N/AD Minimal surface corrosion acceptable.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YN ND-- UD- N/ADl Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-168 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YE ND ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-031 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area 1 PLENUM SWEL Components:

SWELl-048

& 049 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UD N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YN ND U[D N/AD 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NDI UD- N/ADl 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Pulley & Pulley Cover laying on floor from 21 Fan which is disassembled for repairs. This is not a seismic concem given location of items.Y[ NDI UD N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-169 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEI UE--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-031 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area' PLENUM SWEL Components:

SWELl -048 & 049 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No more concerns on seismic or other issues Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-24-2012 Kirit Parikh 10-24-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-170 of 203 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NR UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-031 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 72'-O" Room, Area' PLENUM SWEL Components:

SWELl-048

& 049 Photographs Note: Fan EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-171 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ui-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-031 Location:

Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area 1 PLENUM SWEL Components:

SWELl-048

& 049 Note: Overhead area with 22 fan on left.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-172 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 7 IP2 Status: YE NEI U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location:

Bldg. NTF Floor El. 82'-0" Room, Area 1 TANK FARM SWEL Components:

SWELl-094 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Platform between Refueling Water Storage Tank and Primary Water Storage Tank has two cross braces (bracing platform in EW direction) at RWST bolt 29 that are cut for a RWST pipe to pass through. Need to verify that a platform seismic analysis of the "as-is" platform was performed.

LB-07 was performed to evaluate the condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

Minor surface corrosion was observed but is acceptable.

YE- NO Ur-] N/A[L YE NEI UE-- N/AU 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YE NEI UE- N/A[Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-173 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 7 1P2 Status: Y[E NEO U-i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location:

Bldg. NTF Floor El. 82'-0" Room, Area 1 TANK FARM SWEL Components:

SWELl-094 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE] NO UE] N/AE]spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Platform between 21RWST and Primary Water Storage Tank is very close to touching both tanks. Approximately 1/8" gap between tanks and platform.

LB-07 was performed to evaluate the gap.Roof cover on cabinet EPA-20 is close to RWST. Gap judged acceptable given components involved.Transmission tower is nearby & wihin fall arc of tank. Tower and tower anchorage judged acceptable seismically.

Transmission lines are over top of the tank are typically designed to withstand wind, snow, and ice loads. Judged to be adequate for seismic loading compared to typical design loads.The RWST tank valve on North side is almost touching to the platform leg. Gap is very narrow almost 1/8". LB-07 was performed to evaluate the gap.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area. Area is outdoors and gets rained/snowed on regularly.

Therefore spray will not affect the items. The area is elevated above adjacent grade allowing ample runoff from area to prevent flooding in the area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NE] UE] N/A[]YE NEI IUE] N/A[L EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-174 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 7 1P2 Status: Y[Z NEI U[L Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location:

Bldg. NTF Floor El. 82'-O" Room, Area 1 TANK FARM SWEL Components:

SWELl -094 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NOI- UF- N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI Nil UL[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Insulation on EWD70 RWST Instrument Panel needs repair. CR IP2-2012-06516 issued for tracking.Piping insulation

& insulation flashing damaged in multiple places. CR IP2-2012-06516 issued for tracking.None of the above are adverse seismic conditions.

References:

CR IP2-2012-06516 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-25-2012 Kirit Parikh 10-25-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-1 75 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 7 IP2 Status: Y[E N-] ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location:

Bldg. NTF Floor El. 82'-O" Room, Area 1 TANK FARM SWEL Components:

SWELl -094 Photographs FE Note: Very small gap between plafform and RWST.Note: Very small gap between platform and Primary Water Storage Tank EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-176 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 7 IP2 Status: YIE NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location:

Bldg. NTF Floor El. 82'-0" Room, Area 1 TANK FARM SWEL Components:

SWELl -094 11uM. r'IIluffi uLdrulfI fha UVWn uut juS[ iunorfh oM RWST bolt 29 for the RWST pipe end to pass.acing on normal plartorm Trames.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-177 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 7 IP2 Status: YO NEI UF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location:

Bldg. NTF Floor El. 82'-0" Room, Area 1 TANK FARM SWEL Components:

SWELl -094 Note: Valve hand wheel at RWST anchor bolt 29 is very close to touching the platform at frame with cut bracing. Gap is very narrow, almost 1/8".Platform could potentially hit valve handle.Note: Piping insulation

& insulation flashing damaged in multiple places.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-178 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 7 1P2 Status: YO NE]I U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location:

Bldg. NTF Floor El. 82'-0" Room, Area 1 TANK FARM SWEL Components:

SWELl -094 Note: Roof cover on cabinet EPA-20 is close to RWST. Gap judged acceptable given components involved.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-179 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NO urI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-033 Location:

Bldg. ELE Tunnel Roof Floor El. 73'-7" Room, Area 1 Behind EDG Buildinq SWEL Components:

SWELl-050 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Y[ NDI UD N/A-2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

YE ND UD N/AD Minimal surface corrosion acceptable.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YE ND UD N/ADI Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-180 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NDI UD-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-033 Location:

Bldg. ELE Tunnel Roof Floor El. 73'-7" Room, Area 1 Behind EDG Building SWEL Components:

SWELl -050 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEil uil N/AD1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Area is out doors so items gets rained on and snowed on regularly.

Component is on an elevated area and flooding would flow off area to lower ground.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.Y[ NDI u-- N/A--YN NDI UD- N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

YIZ ND uDl N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-181 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NI I U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-033 Location:

Bldg. ELE Tunnel Roof Floor El. 73-7" Room, Area 1 Behind EDG Building SWEL Components:

SWELl -050 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NO U[-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Handrail has corroded off in area. CR IP2-2012-06377 issued to track resolution.

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell f 2 Date: 10-25-2012 Kirit Parikh 10-25-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-182 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NI ULII Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-033 Location:

Bldg. ELE Tunnel Roof Floor El. 73'-7" Room, Area 1 Behind EDG Building SWEL Components:

SWELl -050 Photographs Note: 21 Note: Framing located west of 21 Exhaust Fan.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-183 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-033 Location:

Bldg. ELE Tunnel Roof Floor El. 73'-7" Room, Area 1 Behind EDG Building SWEL Components:

SWELl -050 Note: Handrail has corroded off in area.2012-06377 issued to track resolution.

Note: Overhead at Fans.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-184 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 7 1P2 Status: YE NDI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location:

Bldg. CWST Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 CST SWEL Components:

SWELl -095 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YE NDI UI- N/AD-2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

YN NEI U-D N/A--Minimal surface corrosion acceptable.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y[ NDI UD- N/AD1 Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-185 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 7 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location:

Bldg. CWST Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 CST SWEL Components:

SWELl -095 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[il ULI N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Area is out doors so items gets rained on and snowed on regularly.

Component is on an elevated area and flooding would flow off area to lower ground.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.Y[ NDI u-' N/ADl YEZ NDl uDl N/ADl 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

Y[D ND UDI N/ADI EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-186 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 7 1P2 Status: YE NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location:

Bldg. CWST Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area' CST SWEL Components:

SWELl -095 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEil U-il adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Gravel & stones around tank free to roll during seismic event. Judged acceptable.

Chair inside fence gate is unsecured.

Judged acceptable given location of chair.Evaluated by: Nick Crispell " "-" -Date: 10-25-2012 Kirit Parikh 10-25-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-187 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 7 IP2 Status: YN NEI Ul--I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location:

Bldg. CWST Floor El. 80-0" Room, Area 1 CST SWEL Components:

SWELl -095 Photographs N oxe: items arouna ranK.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-188 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 7 1P2 Status: YN NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location:

Bldg. CWST Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 CST SWEL Components:

SWELl -095 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-189 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 7 IP2 Status: YE NEI- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location:

Bldg. CWST Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 CST SWEL Components:

SWELl -095 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-190 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 7 1P2 Status: YN NEI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location:

Bldg. CWST Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 CST SWEL Components:

SWELl -095 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-191 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 9 IP2 Status: YE NO- U[-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -005, 021, 022 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

There is a 2Y4" outside diameter pipe connecting to PCV-1284 which appears to have excessive unsupported length. See photos. From the first support, the pipe has a 2Y 2 'horizontal run, a 3' vertical run and a 2Y 2 'horizontal run at which point it connects to a heavy valve and two large diameter flanges. After that, there is a 6" vertical run of 7/8" OD tubing followed by a 2Y' run of 7/8" OD tubing to the next support. LB-12 issued to resolve.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

5/8"+/- diameter anchor bolts of F1-5004 support column are not fully engaged. (top of bolt is approximately Y 4" below the top of the nut). See picture. LB-10 issued to resolve.Y[: NO UEZ N/ALII YD- NO UI- N/A[l 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YO Ni[ U-- N/AEL Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-192 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 9 IP2 Status: YO NO U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -005. 021, 022 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescent lights are too close to the cable tray and hanger. (total two locations for hanger proximity and one location for cable tray proximity.

The interference with the cable tray occurs below the top of the rail on the tray and would not result in impact of the light fixture on the cables.The interference with the hangers occurs at approximately midspan of the vertical hanger rod. (See pictures).

It is estimated that the seismic response of the light fixture impacting the hanger rod would have no affect on the integrity of the hanger rod.Long span 5/8" OD" tubing has little separation and typical span length of eight feet. The tubes will interact with each other during seismic event. (See photo) There are also 3/8" OD tubes also in close proximity to each other which have similar unsupported spans. LB-13 issued to resolve.At the entry to the room there is 5/8" OD tubing which has relatively long unsupported spans as noted in the isometrics below.YOI NO ULI N/AOI 3 support 8 6" 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YE NEI- U[I N/AI EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-193 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 9 1P2 Status: YIE NEIl U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -005, 021. 022 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YE NEI ULI] N/Al 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

1. The fluorescent light tubes need to be restrained.

CR IP2-2012-06483 has been issued to track resolution.

2. Used glove is found in the area. Upon revisit to the area on 11/19/2012, the glove has been removed.3. Loose tool is found in the area. CR IP2-2012-06483 has been issued to track resolution.

4. Leftover scaffold part is found in the area. Upon revisit to the area on 11/19/2012, the scaffold part has been removed.5. Several florescent lights are out and need to be replaced.

CR IP2-2012-06483 has been issued to track resolution.

6. A scaffold is erected next to the AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22. The scaffold has lateral supports in all directions.

The lateral supports are at floor level and braced to the base plate of protected pump 22, the adjacent nitrogen bottle rack and Rack 5. The scaffold was under construction at the time of inspection and the scaffolding inspector had not done his inspection.

Upon follow up call later that day with the scaffolding inspector he informed us he had independently found and had construction fix the scaffold problems.

Follow up inspection later that day confirmed no seismic issues with the certified and construction completed scaffold.YEr- NE U[-] N/A[:]8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEIT UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-194 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 Sheet 4 of 9 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" SWEL Components:

SWELl-005, 021, 022 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

CR IP2-2012-06483 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST IP2 Status: NO U--Room, Area.Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10-25-2012 Paul Huebsch Date: 10-25-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-195 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 9 1P2 Status: Nr--l ur-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18"-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl-005, 021, 022 Photographs Note: 2"+/- diameter pipe connecting to PCV-1284 has excessive unsupported length.Note: 5/8"+/- diameter anchor bolts of F1-5004 support column are not fully engaged. (Missing about Y 4").EN-DC-168 REV 0 I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-196 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 9 IP2 Status: YE NM- U[-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -005, 021, 022 Note: Note: Fluorescent light is too close to the cable tray (other end of the same light) and support hanger.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-1 97 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 9 1P2 Status: YE NEI UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -005, 021, 022 Note: Long span tubing has little separation

(<1/2'). They will be interactive each other during seismic event.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-198 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 8 of 9 1P2 Status: YIO NEI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -005, 021, 022 Note: Leftover scaffold part is found in the area.Note: Wrench hung by a wire in front of the instrument panel.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-199 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 9 of 9 1P2 Status: YEZ NE] U--I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -005, 021, 022 Note: Tubing with excessive distance between supports at entry to room.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-200 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NEI U1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-036 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 77"4" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -043. 044, 045, 046 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YE NEI ULI N/AEJ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

Surface corrosion on components in area judged acceptable.

Y[] NEI tJE] NIAE: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YE NEI ULI N/AE1 Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.,If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-201 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[D NO] Ui-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-036 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 77-4" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -043. 044, 045. 046 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE] U[I N/A]spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.YE NEI U[-] N/AU 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.YO NE] U[I N/AU 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

1. Fluorescent light tubes need to be secured with wires. CR IP2-2012-06741 has been issued to track resolution.

2. One light bulb is out and needs to be replaced.

Called lights out hotline at ext 7600.3. Large piece of grating was noted to be stored on a concrete ledge.The grating was adequately secured by scaffold poles and is not a seismic risk. Loose grating clips are on the concrete ledge adjacent to the stored grating. Upon a second visit on 11/19/2012 it was noted that the grating clips had been removed.YE] NE UL- N/AU EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-202 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 Sheet 3 of 4 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-036 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 77'-4" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWEL1 -043, 044, 045. 046 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST IP2 Status: YS NO U--YEZ NEIl uO Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A piece of grating was observed stored on a concrete ledge. The grating was adequately secured by scaffold poles and is not a seismic risk.

References:

CR IP2-2012-06741 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10-25-2012 Paul Huebsch 10-25-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-203 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ur-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-036 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 77'-4" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components:

SWELl -043, 044, 045, 046 Photographs Note: Grating stored on concrete ledge and adequately restrained using scaffold poles.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. 0 Page E- I of 10 ATTACHMENT E -POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. Di Page E-2 of 10 tb'<<1 Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN AWC-004 N/A" 23DC Power Panel door not closed. Latch is broken and latch is missing parts." 24DC Power PNL has latches in the open position.

Door is shut and multiple other latches on door are in dosed position.CONDITION ENTERED DIRECTLY INTO CAP CR Operability Review: No degraded or nonconforming condition exists per EN-OP-104 Revision 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. The DC Panel doors ability to latch does not impact the breaker operation within the panel. No DC circuits are impacted by this condition.

There is no immediate reportability per EN-SMM-LI-108.

Operability re-opened per CRG to add more information on the seismic impact Engineering was contacted and reported that -The cabinet contains molded circuit breakers only, which are not sensitive to vibration and therefore this is not an seismic operability issue.Furthermore, if the door opened -nothing of consequence would be damaged. No degraded or nonconforming condition exists per EN-OP-104 Revision 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. There is no immediate reportability per EN-SMM-LI-108.

CR Action: WRN 286977 generated I I + 4 Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN N/A AWC-004 Lighting panel 219 door slightly ajar (not closed/latched).

Operations personnel shut panel in our presence.CONDITION ENTERED DIRECTLY INTO CAP CR Operability Review: The Lighting Panel door unlatched does not impact the breaker operation within the panel. The breakers inside lighting panel 219 are not vibration sensitive and therefore would not be affected during a seismic event. The issue addressed in this CR describes a good practice and not a functionality issue. Lighting Panel 219 remains functional.

There is no immediate reportability per EN-SMM-LI-108.

CR-IP2-2012-06119 CLOSED CR Action: close to track and trending and coaching Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: This CR describes unsecured fluorescent bulbs on the 15' and 33' of AWC-004 the control building.

This is not a seismic good practice and needs to be corrected.

However, N/A SWELl-059 Overhead fluorescent bulb doesn't have wire securing bulb to CONDITION ENTERED no equipment is currently being impacted.

In the event of a seismic event, if the bulbs fell out, CR-IP2-2012-06120 fixture. DIRECTLY INTO CAP they would break before damaging vital equipment such as static inverters and the 480V CLOSED SWELl-069 switchgear.

It would cause a housekeeping concern, but they would not render required safety related SSC's inoperable.

Not reportable per SMM-LI-108.

CR Action: use ty-wraps or wire to secure the bulbs to the fixture. WRN 286982.

Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page E-3 of 10 ST~C, TA"I"I IC. I IP. Akl CR Operability Review: The described lifting hoist and anchoring chain was found to allow for approximately 12 inches of hoist movement.

This movement would not have allowed for any contact with any safety related SSC. No degraded or nonconforming condition exists per EN-OP-104 Revision 6 Attachment 9g1 Table 1. This arrangement has since been securely tightened.

SMM-LI-108 reporting is not required.N/A AWC-003 The engine hoist tool located on the north wall needs to be tied more securely to the fixed post. Hoist can roll side to side along wall and impact the nearby instrument rack.CONDITION ENTERED DIRECTLY INTO CAP CR-IP2-2012-06135 CLOSED CR Action: needs to be chained around several perpendicular members to prevent movement or better yet remove from the room.Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN* Fluorescent bulbs need wire restraints securing bulb to fixture.* 8' ladder left unsecured behind west side of mcc 266B. CR Operability Review: All housekeeping concerns identified in CR were corrected.

The AWC-024

• Tool box on wheels left on secured on east side of MCC26BB. condition described in this CR does not affect a required safety related system, structure or N/A AWC-023 -Pliers left on top of the 120 volt distribution panel #2. CONDITION ENTERED component as defined in EN-OP-104.

All seismic concerns raised in this CR have been CR-IP2-2012-06354

• A ladder not secured and batching tools left loose on boric DIRECTLY INTO CAP addressed and no longer pose any potential hazard. Therefore, no functionality or operability CLOSED acid batching tank platform.

A load (barrel lifting apparatus) is determination is required.

There is no IP-SMM-LI-108 immediate reportability associated with left hanging on hook of the overhead trolley. Items could fall this condition over or swing affecting components in the area.CR Action: Need to remove the items from the area Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN All cover screws (2 of 2) on south side of EPF9, EPG1, EPF7, & CR Operability Review: All housekeeping concerns identified in CR were corrected.

The EPF8 are either not tightly secured or completely missing. One of CONDITION ENTERED condition described in this CR does not affect a required safety related system, structure or CR-IP2-2012-06355 AWC-024 these has the latch handle turned differently than the others DIRECTLY INTO CAP component as defined in EN-OP-104.

Therefore, no functionality or operability determination is CLOSED meaning one panel door is free to swing open. CR IP2-2012-required.

There is no IP-SMM-LI-108 immediate reportability associated with this condition 06355 issued to track resolution.

CR Action: Re-install the screws properly.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 124-0037 Rev. 0 Page E-4 of 10 N/A AWC-035 SWELl-005 SWELl-079* Loose tool is found in the area and needs to be During a seismic event the tool will swing and st valves/equipment.

• The fluorescent light bulbs need wires securing fixture to prevent them from falling in a seismic L -4, Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: No Degraded or Nonconforming Condition exists per EN-OP-104 rev 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. Per discussion with civil engineering, the described conditions do not pose a threat of damage to the aux feed water pumps or associated support equipment removed, even in a seismic event based on their location and mass and the energy they would be trike nearby capable of imparting on the safety-related equipment.

The described conditions are CONDITION ENTERED housekeeping concerns; therefore, the Aux Feedwater system remains operable.

CR-IP2-2012-06483 themDIRECTLY INTO CAP No immediate reportability required per IP-SMM-LI-108.

CLOSED event.CR Action: WRN 290243 Secure loose tool, use wires to secure the fluorescent light to the fixtures (towards the two ends) and replace the lights that are out.Tool should not be removed since it is staged for ASSD, it should be secured or placed in a proper container.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: No Degraded or Nonconforming Condition exists per EN-OP-104 rev 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. Per discussion with civil engineering, the described conditions do not pose a threat of damage to the steam supply line for 22 aux feed water pump or any associated support equipment even in a seismic event based on their location and mass and N/A AWC-009 Some florescent bulbs need wires securing the bulb to the fixture CONDITION ENTERED the energy they would be capable of imparting on the safety-related equipment.

The described CR-IP2-2012-06485 DIRECTLY INTO CAP conditions are housekeeping concems: therefore, the Aux Feedwater system remains CLOSED operable.No immediate reportability required per IP-SMM-LI-108.

CR Action: WRN 290243 Use wires to secure the fluorescent light to the fixtures (towards the two ends)Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN Scaffold tag 866B with a red "unsafe" sign spans over the 21 AWC-019 containment spray pump. the scaffold is not braced well in the CONDITION ENTERED N/A COprbltReiw21cnanetsrypmisoeal.CR-I P2-201 2-06578 SWELl-027 east/west direction and would impact valve if it collapses or sways DIRECTLY INTO CAP during a seismic event.CR Action: The scaffold was removed.

Engineering Report No. lP-RPT-12-(l0037 Rev. 0 Page E-5 of I(0 Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: No degraded or nonconforming condition exists per EN-OP-104 Revision 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. This condition was discussed with the originator and there is no operability concern with the CCW pumps or any other safety related equipment in the area. There is a safety concern in the event the bulbs were to fall and shatter during a seismic event. CCW pumps remain operable.

There is no IP-SMM-LI-108 immediate reportability CR-1P2-2012-06614 associated with this condition.

N/A AWC-018 Fluorescent bulbs need restraint wires to secure them to the light fixture.CONDITION ENTERED DIRECTLY INTO CAP CR Action: Restraint wires should be installed to secure the light bulbs to the fixture. The Work Order(s) written in conjunction with CR-IP2-2012-06354 for the same purpose should be revised to incorporate tasks covering this PAB location.Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: Discussed condition with the author and the 23 sump pump float guide in the unsupported configuration does not cause any operability concerns with the CCW pumps or safety related equipment in the area. The CCW pumps and associated equipment CONDITION ENTERED remains operable.

The sump pump is currently working in the degraded condition.

In the CR-1P2-2012-06616 NA AWC-018 23 Sump pump missing all bolts on float rod guide. DIRECTLY INTO CAP event that the float were to not function properly an alarm would actuate on high level in the sump notifying the operator that an abnormal condition exists and it would be addressed.

The level alarm switch is a separate device and remains functional.

There is no IP-SMM-LI-108 immediate reportability associated with this condition.

CR Action: Properly secure the float rod guide Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: No degraded or nonconforming condition exists per EN-OP-104 Revision 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. This condition was discussed with the originator and there CONDITION ENTERED is no operability concern with the safety related equipment in the area. There is a safety N/A AWC-022 Fluorescent light tubes need to be restrained.

concern in the event the bulbs were to fall and shatter during a seismic event. Equipment in CR-IP2-2012-06663 DIRECTLY INTO CAP the PAB remains operable.

There is no IP-SMM-LI-108 immediate reportability associated with this condition.

CR Action: Restrain the fluorescent light bulbs to the fixture with wires and all safety related areas of the PAB Enginecring Report No. IP-RPT-12-001037 Rev. 0i Page E-6 of1"0 Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN* Tool cart is tied off but all tools are loose on top of cart and CR Operability Review: No degraded or nonconforming condition exists per EN-OP-104 could be displaced in a seismic event. CONDITION ENTERED Revision 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. The housekeeping issues were resolved.

The walkdown N/A AWC-022

• There was an unsecured ladder DIRECTLY INTO CAP engineer states that there is no seismic issue with the stated condition and therefore there is CR-IP2-2012-06664

• Various equipment and miscellaneous items loose on a grating no operability impact to the safety related equipment in the area. There is no IP-SMM-LI-108 which was tagged "seismically sensitive area", immediate reportability associated with this condition.

CR Action: Assure all loose items are properly stored and the ladder is properly restrained.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: No degraded or nonconforming condition exists per EN-OP-104 Revision 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. This condition was discussed with the originator and there CONDITION ENTERED is no operability concern with the AFW pumps, Pipe Pen or any other safety related equipment N/A AWC-036 Fluorescent light tubes need to be secured with wires, DIRECTLY INTO CAP in the area. There is a safety concern in the event the bulbs were to fall and shatter during a CR-IP2-2012-06741 seismic event. Affect area Safety related equipment remains operable.

There is no IP-SMM-LI-108 immediate reportability associated with this condition.

CR Action: Implement a plan to secure the fluorescent light bulbs to the fixtures in all areas where safety related systems or components are present.Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: No Degraded or Nonconforming Condition exists per EN-OP-104 rev 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. Per discussion with Civil Engineering, the described condition does not seismically impact the operability of the CCW system or the spent fuel pool cooling system.The tubing in question is only for local indication of the CCW return flow and is located on the Tubing running to the SEP heat exchanger is vibrating CONDITION ENTERED top of the heat exchanger.

Even if the tubing were to break, it would not drain the CCW out of N/A AWC-008 significantly.

Long span of approximately 6' for a 'A" tubing DIRECTLY INTO CAP the heat exchanger and any leakage that could occur would be within the capacity of the sump CR-I P2-2012-6753 appears to be excessive.

pumps in the building.

Presently the flow indication is reading appropriately and no damage was evident to the tubing which continues capable of performing its function.

Therefore, the CCW system and the SFPC system remain operable.No immediate reportability required per IP-SMM-LI-108.

CR Action: Investigate reason for vibration and assess the tubing span.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-001037 Rev. i)Page E-7 of 1I 5--Initial Action: CR GENERATED

-SEE STATUS COLUMN* Magnetic camera mounting appears to be inadequate for CR Operability Review: No Degraded or Nonconforming Condition exists per EN-OP-104 rev seismic loading. 6 Attachment 9.1 Table 1. The described condition of the camera does not impact the N/A AWC-008 CONDITION ENTERED performance of safety related equipment The Gas bottle has been removed from this area and CR-IP2-2012-06774

• tool box not secured DIRECTLY INTO CAP the identified equipment has either been removed or securely staged. No immediate reportability required per IP-SMM-LI-108.

• miscellaneous tools not secured CR Action: In addition to addressing the housekeeping type deficiencies, establish the need for the camera after a seismic event and evaluate its anchorage.

Engineering Report No. I P-RPT- 12-0(1037 Rev. I)Page E-8 of 10 MAW'q -. ....P 'FI R *,, 'TAU The evaluation concluded that. (1) the cable tray support was The seismic walkdown team observed that a conduit appeared to be too close to a cable tray support frame over the 22 MG Set analyzed for seismic loads and (2) the approximately 3/4" gap IB-Ol between the conduit and cable tray support frame is acceptable.,/

SWELI-062 (possible spatial interaction) and questioned if the cable tray N/A N/A Thus, the observed conditions are consistent with our licensing support frame is seismically designed,.ass basis.The overhead pipe near the roof line of the EDOG building eastern The unengaged threads, or recess, cover a distance of 1/4 inch or side is supported on three wide flange columns. These columns are less. Based on Calculation IP3-CALC-MULT-00734, a recess Of 0.27 LB-02 SWELt-032 supported on baseplates bolted to a concrete pier. Some of the inches for a 1 inch diameter bolt does not reduce the bolt capacity.

N/A N/A nuts are not fully engaged (bolt does not project past the nut). Bolt Thus, a recess of 1/4" (0.25") or less is consistent with our licensing recess within the nut is 1/4 inch or less, basis.The seismic walkdown team observed small cracks near bolt nos.30, 24 & 25, which were not a seismic concern, and significant The spalled concrete and cracks are associated with a concrete mat concrete spalling and numerous cracks near bolt nos. 16,17,18,19.

protective layer. This spalling and cracking of this protective layer N/A N/A LB-03 SWEL1-094NAN/

The concrete spalling and cracks bring into question the RWST does not affect the anchorage of the RWST. and the observed anchorage adequacy.

In addition to this LBE, CR IP2-2012-06547 condition is consistent with our licensing basis.was issued to track resolution.

Work performed in conjunction with Work Order IP2-05-0522 and The seismic walkdown team observed that the anchor for the CCW ER No. 05-26433 indicates that at Support ACH-60, there is a vetical LB-04 AWC-01B pipe support is missing 2 of4 anchor bolts. It was also noted that load of 1700 pounds and very small vertical seismic load. With no N/A N/A the missing anchor bolts are tagged with an old Work Order IP2 tension acting on the bolts, the existing configuration is consistent 0522 written in 2005. with our licensing basis.The seismic walkdown team observed that the support stanchion CR IP2-1998-04788 indicates that "This condition has been for the overhead crane in the Safety Injection Pump Room area in previously evaluated and found acceptable.

Calculation FFX-the PAB Elev. 59'-0" has a four hole base plate and only three bolts 00088-02 covers the design of the monorail with the missing N/A N/A LB-OS AWC-0t7NANA are installed.

It is noted that all other similar stanchions have four anchor bolt.. The CR also indicates that the Design Drawing bolts installed in the base plate and that per signage on the indicates this base plate as having only 3 bolts. Thus, the observed stanchion the anchor is abandoned per FEI-840679.

condition is consistent with our licensing basis.The existing configuration was conservatively modeled and The seismic walkdown team question if the Unit heater 232 hot seismically analyzed.

The piping configuration was found to satisfy N/A N/A LB-06 AWC-022 water piping is seismically designed/supported.

B31.1 requirements.

Thus, the condition is consistent with the licensing basis.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. O)Page E-Q) of I0[ RESQ.tUION4 STATUI, The seismic walkdown team noted that: "Platform between Refueling Water Storage Tank and Primary Water Storage Tank has The evaluation concluded that: (1) the existing platform, including two cross braces (bracing platform in EW direction) at RWST bolt the missing brace, was seismically analyzed (Calculation FCX-0098-29 that are cut for a RWIST pipe to pass through. Need to verify that AWC-32 a platform seismic analysis of the "as-is" platform was performed." 01), (2) the sum of the maximum horizontal displacements of the The team also noted that: "Platform between 21RWST and Primary tanks and platform, i.e., 0.07315", is less than the 1/8" (0.12S")LB-07 & Water Storage Tank is very close to touching both tanks. gap, and that (3) the sum of the vertical displacements of the N/A N/A SWEL1-094 Approximately 1/8" gap between tanks and platform.

LBE needed tank(s) and platform is less than the horizontal displacement (and to determine if gap is acceptable for both tanks 21RWST and thus less than the gap between the valve mounted on the tank and Primary Water Storage Tank" and "Valve hand wheel at RWST the platform.

Thus, the observed conditions are consistent with the anchor bolt 29 is very close to touching the platform at frame with cut bracing. Gap is very narrow, almost 1/8". Platform could licensing basis.potentially hit valve handle." The evaluation concluded that the sum of the maximum The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the gap between Battery displacement of Battery Charger 21 and the adjacent Instrument LB-08 SWELl-072 Charger 21 and the adjacent instrument rack west of the cabinet is Rack is 0.14 inches. It is thus concluded that the 1/2" gap N/A N/A 1/2" and questioned if this gap is sufficient to preclude seismic between the Battery Charger 21 and the adjacent Instrument interaction.

Rack is sufficient to preclude spatial interactions and the condition satisfies the licensing basis.Technical Report No. 91177-TR-Ot, "Diesel Generator Fuel Gil The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that one pipe is supported from another pipe.. This is a non typical pipe support. Design System, Seismic Verification Summary Report," September 1991 LB-09 AWC-12 drawings for this support were not available at time of walk down. analyzed the observed configuration and confirmed the pipes and One pipe (insulated pipe) runs to the Emergency Domestic truck fill supports are adequate under all postulated loads and load stop valve and the other orange pipes from the EDG building to combinations, including OBE and DBE loads. Thus, the observed near 23FOTP condition is consistent with the licensing basis.The tension loading of the bolts anchoring the base plate for Instrument F1-5004 is very small, as discussed in the attached The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the S/8" diameter anchor evaluation.

As such, given that a recess of 0.172" for a S/8" LB-tO AWC-035 bolts of the Fl-5004 support column are not fully engaged. (top of diameter bolt does not reduce the bolt tension capacity, the N/A N/A bolt is approximately

'%" below the top of the nut). 8/100" larger recess observed is acceptable and we conclude that the observed condition is consistent with the licensing basis.Based on calculation GCC-00025-00, the load acting on the base The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the EDG exhaust pipe is plate and grout is minimal Furthermore, considering the 5000 psi LB-11 SWELl-77 supported on a post frame that also supports fuse panel for 22 Pre compressive strength of the grout, and the more that 75% of the N/A N/A Lube Pump, 22 Lube oil HTR, and 22 Jacket Water HTR. This support base plate area supported on grout, the compression capacity of has damaged & missing grout under the eastern post base plate. the grout is more than sufficient to withstand the acting loads.Thus, the condition is in accordance with the IP2 licensing basis.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page E-lO of I0 LCNIrBSIS'EVALUATION CONCLUSION.:, IDENIFIE~CONLICOENSIN6-

-B* -'S- RESOLUTION:--

ST1U A subsequent walkdown of the pipe location by members of the The Seismic Walkdown Team noted at Elev. 18'-6" of the AFB IPEC Design Engineering Department certified for performance of that There is a 2%" outside diameter pipe connecting to PCV- the Seismic Walkdowns, assessed the configuration and found 1284 which appears to have excessive unsupported length., that: (1) spans are not excessive for the 2 3/4" diameter pipe, for From the first support, the pipe has a 2X ' horizontal run, a 3' which a span of 8'-0" would not be questionable, (2) the in-line N/A N/A vertical run and a 21/2 ' horizontal run at which point it loads are not excessive, and (3) the configuration is acceptable.

As connects to a heavy valve and two large diameter flanges. th *ng under consideration does not have excessive After that, there is a 6" vertical run of 7/8" 00 tubing he pipinudecosertndesothvexsie Afoltower thatbther a 6vertical run of 7/8" OD tubing totunsupported lengths, we find the configuration acceptable and followed by a 2Y' run of 7/8" OD tubing to the sent support. wti h 2lcnigbss within the IP2 licensing basis.A subsequent walkdown of the tubing locations by members of the IPEC Design Engineering Department certified for performance of the Seismic Walkdowns, assessed the configurations and found The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that Long span 5/8" OD" tubing that: (1) The tubing spans are not excessive, (2) all tubes in close has little separation and typical span length of eight feet .The tubes proximity have common supports and spans, and (3) the will interact with each other during seismic event. There are also N/A N/A 3/8" OD tubes also in close proximity to each other which have separation is such that any impact of adjacent tubes under a similar unsupported spans. seismic event will be associated with extremely small impact forces while eliminating any possible resonance and enhancing the system damping. As such, the configurations were found to be acceptable and within the IP2 licensing basis.While performing an area walkby of Elevation 59"-0" of the PAB, The evaluation established that the vertical span is not excessive the Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the HVAC ductwork and, under a postulated seismic occurrence, the stresses in the adjacent to the stairs does not have any lateral support from the N/A N/A base to beyond the first elbow at the top. The span appears to be duct are very low. As such, the configuration was found lobe excessive.

acceptable and within the IP2 licensing basis.i'l ft&-Prepared by: Reviewed by: Dragos Nuta Date: Date: r Richard Drake Peer Review Team Member Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. 0 Page F- I of 54 ATTACHMENT F -LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev.-O, Page F-2 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-01 Originating SWC/AWC SWELl-062 Equipment ID No. 22MGS Equip. Class 13 Equipment Description 22 Machine Generator Set Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0 Room, Area Cable Spreading Room Condition"Cable tray support frame (over top of 22 MG SET) appears too close to the conduit west of the frame but is adequately separated from the 22 MG SET. The frame might interact with the conduit. Additionally the cable tray support frame does not appear to be seismically designed." Documents Reviewed Drawings 320933, 320997 Calculation No. GCC-00154-02, FCX-00336-00, FCX-00337-00 Licensing Basis (1) SSCs located nearby safety-related SSCs must be seismically designed to assure the safety related functions are not affected.(2) Spatial interactions shall not affect the functionality of safety related SSCs.Evaluation As indicated hereafter, the evaluation established that the cable tray support frame was seismically analyzed and the gap between the cable tray support frame and adjacent conduit is acceptable.

Conclusion Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: ZYes[I No Prepared by: Dragos Nuta Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Date 10/25/12 Date Z_EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-3 of 54 SWELl-062

-Recorded Interaction Effects During the walkdown, we noted/questioned the following: "Cable tray support frame (over top of 22 MG SET) appears too close to the conduit west of the frame but is adequately separated from the 22 MG SET. The frame might interact with the conduit. Additionally the cable tray support frame does not appear to be seismically designed." Licensing Basis Assessment

-Seismic Design of Steel Frame (Support 320933)Drawing No. 320933, "Cable Spreading Room, Cable Tray Plans and Sections," deals with the precise support mentioned in our SWEL notes. The frame is located at Column Line K-8 of the Elev. 33'-0 Cable Spreading'K8B A7 -, '/7>fS, T'1'/~PARTIAL PLAN AT % fl 2 Room (Excerpt from Dwg 320933): Sections A -A and B -B shown on the plan above are as follows: P 4'A 14 .i 6LvK" A-A 2 I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-4 of 54 114 JT~..i I,Pictures taken during the Seismic Walkdown of Support 320933 framing that spans the 22 MG Set are as follows: 3 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-5 of 54 In the picture above, 22 MG Set is below the frame and the northern end of the MG Set Switchgear is shown on the right side.Two views of the conduit found to be approximately 3/4 inches away from the western end of the frame are shown below: 4 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-6 of 54 The Licensing Basis Evaluation concluded the following:

1. Regarding the seismic design of Support Frame 320933, Dwg. 320933 refers to "Seismic Calculations No. FCX-00336-00 and FCX-00337-00" and indicates the cable tray supports are seismically qualified.

Both calculations include seismic cable tray analyses performed by EQE. Thus, the support was seismically qualified.

5 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-7 of 54 2. Regarding the possible spatial interface between the support frame and the conduit located west of the frame, as shown in the pictures above, assuming the relative movements of the frame and conduit exceed the approximately 3/4 inch gap, it is our judgment that the conduit has sufficient flexibility to accommodate a displacement that includes a slight impingement and its structural integrity will not be challenged.

6 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-8 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of+-Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-02 Originating SWC/AWC SWELl -032 Equipment ID No. 0032FOTP Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description Fuel Oil Trasnfer Pump D.G. 23 Location:

Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area Condition The overhead pipe near the roof line of the EDG building is supported on three wide flange columns. These columns are supported on baseplates with some nuts not fully engaged.The bolt recess within the nut is 1/4 inch or less. Typical of all three baseplates.

Documents Reviewed* IP3-CALC-MULT-00734

• EPRI Document NP-5057, Volume I" AISC, "Manual of Steel Construction," 8th and 9th Editions.Licensing Basis Anchorages must have sufficient capacity so that all safety-related SSCs maintain structural integrity and perform their safety related function under all applicable loads and load combinations, including those associate with postulated seismic events.Evaluation The unengaged threads, or recess, cover a distance of 1/4 inch or less. Based on Calculation IP3-CALC-MULT-00734, a recess Of 0.27 inches for a 1 inch diameter bolt does not reduce the bolt capacity.

Refer to the attached evaluation.

Thus, a recess of 1/4" (0.25") or less is consistent with our licensing basis.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Prepared by: Draqos A. NutaAýUýLicensing Basis Reviewer Z Yes[-- No Reviewed by: Peer Reviewer Date / 2Ct.Date 1 1-- Z .-

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-9 of 54 EVALUATION In SWELl -032, the walkdown team noted that the overhead pipe near the roof line of the EDG building (east side of the building, above the slab over the Fuel Oil Storage Tanks) is supported on three wide flange columns. These columns are supported on baseplates with some nuts not fully engaged. The bolt recess within the nut for the 1-inch diameter bolts is 1/4 inch or less. Typical of all three baseplates.

Based on Calculation IP3-CALC-MULT-00734, a bolt recess of 0.27 inches or less for a 1-inch diameter bolt does not reduce the bolt capacity.

Given that the bolt recess on one of the four anchor bolts for each of the three column support base plates was 0.25" or less, the bolts have full capacity.Excerpts from Calculation IP3-CALC-MULT-00734 are provided hereafter.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 2 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-10 of 54 NewYorkPower Authority.. ... : ': ... ... ... ..... .. ......... 9 , 3/ ', ,, .: 67 ..I- tA U+/-1~- 'd%I -L-A iH q____ si- IT)5 1 : I- I I J A I h II o L______11ii iiIi ,lI' I0 I0 ,0, -I,--~cz I' L 1.0 IJA I To....'DJ' 7t____,__,_

_ ; I !____ k !I _.M -l _ ' I III (0 -1 1-1 t 1 t -~ 4 + -I --t -I 4 -~ ~ 4--~--- ~---I-----

4--I-i ! _ i -1 EN-DC-168 REV0 3 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-11 of 54 I- .+-I.. -- .ý-ý47 3 _d.........~.49. ~ L~14+0 1 1. -I EN-DC-168REVO 4

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-12 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet I of Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-03 Originating SWC/AWC SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 0021RWST Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description 21 RefuelincI Water Storage Tank Location:

Bldg. NTF Floor El. 82'-0" Room, Area Condition The seismic walkdown team observed small cracks near bolt nos. 30, 24 & 25, which were not a seismic concern, and significant concrete spalling and numerous cracks near bolt nos.16,17,18,19.

The concrete spalling and cracks bring into question the RWST anchorage adequacy.

In addition to this LBE, CR IP2-2012-06547 was issued to track resolution.

Documents Reviewed* Dwg. 9321-F-2250" Structural Assessment of the RWST and PWST Foundations, Inspection Report dated April 10, 2001 Licensing Basis The RWST foundation and anchorage must be capable of maintaining structural integrity under all applicable loads and load combinations, including the postulated occurrence of seismic events.Evaluation The spalled concrete and cracks are associated with a concrete mat protective layer. This spalling and cracking of this protective layer does not affect the anchorage of the RWST. and the observed condition is consistent with our licensing basis.Conclusion Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Prepared by: Draqos A. Nuta Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Pc4koe e d- L- ("_____________Peer Re 'wer M Yes I- No Date 11/06/2012 Date)t / ) ý/)

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-13 of 54 EVALUATION The CR noted that: "During the Fukushima Seismic Walkdowns of the 21 Refueling Water Storage Tank, is was noted that small cracks of the concrete exist near bolt nos. 30, 24 & 25. These are acceptable and not a seismic concern. The walkdown team also noted significant concrete spalling and numerous cracks near bolt nos.16,17,18,19.

A picture depicting these type of cracks is provided below.Significant Spalling and cracks near bolts 16 and 17" (Note the spall/cracks shape appears to be at the same location as the plastered area note in 2001 and shown below on Page 7)The attached documents developed in 2001 indicate that the concrete foundation was protected by a 1/2 inch thick plaster type layer that developed significant cracks (A picture of the delaminated protective layer is shown on Page 5, below). While the plaster was repaired in approximately 2002, the repair was not effective at all locations.

Nevertheless, the observed cracks in the protective layer does not have an adverse effect on the pullout capacity of the RWST anchor bolts.Due rather ineffective repair actions, new remediation actions need to be considered.

The 2001 assessment of the RWST AND pwst foundationS is attached below: EN-DC-168 REV 0 2 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-14 of 54 STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL STRUCTURES Foundations for RWST and PWST In support of a structural assessment of civil structures, a walkdown was performed on April 10, 2001 by Rebecca Hurt and Dan Nuta of the Design Engineering, Civil Projects and Programs.A key plan showing the two tanks with respect to the surrounding structures is presented on Drawing 9321-F-2250, and is duplicated below.NGGrp+ ?4. 5 U)I R tA+)cVATE R WTO R^G&F, T*4k REFUELING WTR.',.TORAGE TANK KEY PLAN 5CA, LE: I"= A summary of the findings is as follows: The Primary and Refueling Water Tank foundations, are structurally sound. The concrete foundation appears to be protected by a plaster like layer approximately one-half inch thick. It has spalled at a couple locations and is cracked at numerous locations.

A more detailed description and assessment of the structural elements, which correlates with information shown on pertinent drawings and photographs taken during the walkdown is presented below.Primary and Refueling Water Tank foundations The Primary and Refueling Water Tank foundations consist of 2-feet thick reinforced concrete circular slabs of 32' and 42' diameters, respectively, supported on 2-feet thick reinforced concrete ring walls founded on rock. At the center of each foundation, the center of the Primary and Refueling Water Tank slabs is supported by square concrete piers, supported on rock, with the sides of the pier being 5' and 7', respectively.

The space between the rock and underside of the slab is filled with "fill." Compacted fill is specified around the outside perimeter of the ring walls.EN-DC-168 REV0 3 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-15 of 54 A plan and cross section through the tank foundations is shown below.K7>L ...I-/~\ t{~~p t x II~////¶ýI.'I i\A ,i~71J 5ECTION i-I The inspection of the tank foundations found no problems in the immediate vicinity of the anchor bolt chairs and, from an "anchorage to concrete" perspective, the anchorage of the tanks is sound.As mentioned above, the outside surface of the concrete ring walls, including the horizontal portion extending beyond the edge of the tank appears to have an approximately Y2" plaster like protective layer.As shown in the following photographs, the layer has spalled at a couple locations, delaminations are present, and cracks and bulges are prevalent.

EN-DC-168 REVO 4 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-16 of 54 Shown in the photograph to the left, the largest spall exists on the southern side of the Primary Water Storage Tank ring wall.A Tag indicating a deficiency is placed in the area indicating that pieces are broken off the foundation.

A close-up picture of the area shows the spalled concrete protective cover pieces that fell, and the "curling of the remaining pieces at the edges where the delamination of the protective cover is visible.Cracking and bulging of the protective cover on the Primary Water Storage Tank ring wall is apparent at numerous locations.

Some of the typical cases are pictured below.EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 5 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-17 of 54 Also for the Primary Water Storage Tank ring wall, the pictures below depict the horizontal crack that seems to have developed between the upper protection cover and the lower portion The pictures above cover the eastern portion of the Primary Water Storage Tank ring wall. In the adjacent picture we show a similar area in the northern portion of the ring wall where pipes penetrate the tank.The mid-height area along the horizontal crack appears to have been previously grouted immediately below the pipe.While the Refueling Water Storage Tank ring wall support has smaller spall areas, it displays the same horizontal crack between the two protective layer "courses," vertical cracks, and small EN-DC-168 REVO 6 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-18 of 54 delaminated areas, as depicted in the pictures that follow, The adjacent picture of the Refueling Water Storage Tank ring wall shows a large spall area that was previously repaired.

The location is along the southern portion of the ring wall.The adjacent picture shows vertical cracks in the protective layer. At the bottom of the crack, along the separation between the upper and lower protective layer courses (which, at this western location is close to grade), a separation of the lower protective course is apparent, as well as delaminations of the protective layer away from the crack zone.While for both tanks the protective layer appears to be in rather poor condition, and would be expected to separate from the ring wall, the concrete behind the protective layer appears to be in excellent shape.There are no reinforcing bars exposed at any of the spall locations, confirming that the layer that is spalling is a protective layer.EN-DC-168 REV 0 7 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-19 of 54 The remediation of this condition will require removal of the loose protective layer followed by the application of an epoxy coating affording protection.

for the ring wall concrete.EN-DC-168 REV0 8 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-20 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet I of 2 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-04 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-018 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description CCW Pump 23 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-0" Room, Area CCW Pump Room Condition Anchor for CCW pipe support missing 2 of 4 anchor bolts. Missing anchor bolts are tagged with an old work order WRT IP2-05-0522 from 2005.Documents Reviewed* Work Order IP2-05-00522" ER IP2-05-26433 Licensing Basis Systems and components must be adequately supported so that they maintain structural integrity under all applicable loads and load combinations and do not affect other safety related SSCs.Evaluation Work performed in conjunction with Work Order IP2-05-0522 and ER No. 05-26433 indicates that at Support ACH-60, there is a vetical load of 1700 pounds and very small vertical seismic load. With no tension acting on the bolts, the existing configuration is consistent with our licensing basis.Conclusion Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Prepared by: Drapos A. Nuta AZ Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: _.by: .-Peer ý r / -0 Yes IZ No Date 11/06/2012 Date ]A V -.!-- -EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-21 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 2 of 2 EVALUATION DESCRIPTION Based on ER IP2-05-26433: "The location was walked down by engineering and found that the size of another two fastners on the base support of ACH-60 is 1/2" dia. The length of the anchor bolts are unknown. The other five base supports installed on suction and discharge elbows are also of the same 1/2" dia size. As there is a operating load of 1700 lbs acting downward per design drawing ACH-60, and there is no uplift due to the fact that the vertical seismic load is much less than the dead load acting downwards, the 1/2" dia, 3 3/4" long HILTI Kwik II expansion anchor bolts are sufficient to carry the loading." (Nevertheless, the ER response also recommended to install the missing fasteners with 1/2" dia, 3 3/4" long HILTI Kwik II expansion anchor bolts with minimum embedment of 2 1/4" and, if needed, to enlarge the bolt hole diameter to suit.)EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-22 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-05 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-017 Equipment ID No. 0021 SIP Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description 21 Safety Iniection Pump Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-0" Room, Area Safety Injection Pump Room Condition Support stanchion for the overhead trolley has a four hole base plate but only three bolts are installed.

All other similar stanchions have four bolts installed in the base plates. Per signage on stanchion the anchor is abandoned in accordance with FEI-840679.

Documents Reviewed" Condition Report CR-IP2-1998-04788

• Work Order No. IP2-98-01397

• Calculation FFX-00088-02 Licensing Basis Systems and components must be adequately supported so that they maintain structural integrity under all applicable loads and load combinations and do not affect other safety related SSCs.Evaluation The evaluation found that, based on statements in CR-IP2-1998-04788, that the design drawing shows only three bolts for the stanchion support. Calculation FFX-00088-02 establishes the seismic design adequacy of the support.Conclusion Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: I Yes E- No Prepared by: Dra Date 11/06/2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: RIC-- ( b .

'v EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-23 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 Sheet 2 of 2 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS EVALUATION DETAILS Material extracted from CR-IP2-1998-04788 supporting the adequacy of the three bolt configuration is duplicated below: AWC-017 notes that: " Support stanchion for the overhead trolley has a four hole base plate but only three bofts are installed.

All other similar stanchions have four bolts installed in the base plates. Per signage on stanchion the anchor is abandoned in accordance with FEI-840679." CR-/P2-1998-04788 indicates that: This is a repeat finding. This condition has been previously evaluated and found acceptable.

Calculation FFX-00088-02 covers the design of the monorail with the missing anchor bolt.and Forward to R. Altadonna, review of this missing bolt was analyzed prior to the 97 outage and as part of the extension of the St trolley beams.and Field condition was NOT compared to the design document prior to the writing of the CITRS Event. Design drawing indicates that this base plate has only 3 anchor bolts.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-24 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet I of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-06 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-022 Equipment ID No. SWELl-025 Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description Boric Acid Transfer Pump 21 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-0 Room, Area Condition A 1.5" (1.9" O.D.), threaded hot water pipe from area heater 232 has a long 15 feet span adjacent to the wall and its seismic design/support adequacy was questioned.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this condition was found.Licensing Basis Safety-related function of nearby equipment must not be impaired by non-safety related equipment such as the hot water heater piping.Evaluation The pipe stress is well below the B31.1 code limit. The piping will not have any adverse II over I interaction during a design basis seismic event.The new evaluation is performed on the next page.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: c... .)A , E[ Yes[I No Prepared by: Reviewed by: Draqos Nuta Licensing Basis Reviewer Date 11-8-2012 Date /- ý- ?IZ--.-Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-25 of 54 AWC- 22 Hot water heater pipe (1.9" OD) with 15 feet pipe span along the wall D = pipe outside diameter = 1.9 inch t = wall thickness for sch 40 pipe = 0.145 inch S = section modulus of 4" Sch 40 pipe = 0.326 in 3 w = uniform weight of pipe and water = 3.60 plf P = design pressure = 150 psi, cons.i =SIF of threaded pipe = 2.3 L = span length of pipe = 15 ft For PAB EL. 72', 0.5% damping response spectra Gh = peak horizontal seismic acceleration

= 0.75 MRM = multi-modal response multiplier

= 2.0 Gv = (2/3)Gh = 0.5 Base on fixed-fixed end condition:

Y X 4 iM, L =A For dead weight normal loading Treat the beam AB as fixed-fixed with length of L in the Y &L=At point A, Mmax = wL 2/12 =M= Mmax =PD/(4t) + 0.75i(Ma/S)

=Sh = allow pipe stress for A53 Gr B, CS material =For seismic loading Gr = SRSS of vertical and horizontal seismic acceleration MRM(Gr) =At point A, Mb = MRM(Gv)Mmax

=Combining DW + seismic DBE Ma + Mb =PD/(4t) + 0.75i(Ma+Mb)/S

=1.8Sh =Pipe is structurally adequate per B31.1 code requirement.

Z direction 15 ft 810 in-lb 810 in-lb 4777 psi, 0.75i = 1.725 15000 psi, o.k.0.9014 1.803 1460.2 2270.2 12504 27000 in-lb in-lb psi psi, o.k.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-26 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 7 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-07 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-032 & SWELl -094 Equipment ID No. (3) Equip. Class Equipment Description Location:

Bldg. Floor El. Room, Area Condition The seismic walkdown team noted that: "Platform between Refueling Water Storage Tank and Primary Water Storage Tank has two cross braces (bracing platform in EW direction) at RWST bolt 29 that are cut for a RWST pipe to pass through. Need to verify that a platform seismic analysis of the "as-is" platform was performed." The team also noted that: "Platform between 21RWST and Primary Water Storage Tank is very close to touching both tanks. Approximately 1/8" gap between tanks and platform.

LBE needed to determine if gap is acceptable for both tanks 21RWST and Primary Water Storage Tank" and " Valve hand wheel at RWST anchor bolt 29 is very close to touching the platform at frame with cut bracing. Gap is very narrow, almost 1/8". Platform could potentially hit valve handle." Documents Reviewed* EQE Calculation 42100-C-002

• Calculation FCX-0098-01 Licensing Basis Structures, Systems, and Components (SSCs) must be designed such that spatial interactions, including relative displacements, under all postulated loads and load combinations, including seismic loads, do not prevent safety related SSCs from performing their intended safety function.

Applied to this particular case, the licensing basis requires that the sum of the displacements of the tank and platform be less than the separation (gap)provided.Evaluation The evaluation concluded that: (1) the existing platform, including the missing brace, was seismically analyzed (Calculation FCX-0098-01), (2) the sum of the maximum horizontal displacements of the tanks and platform, i.e., 0.07315", is less than the 1/8" (0.125") gap, and that (3) the sum of the vertical displacements of the tank(s) and platform is less than the horizontal displacement (and thus less than the gap between the valve mounted on the tank and the platform.

Thus, the observed conditions are consistent with the licensing basis.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: E Yes EI No Prepared by: Draqos A. Nuta Date It Licensing Basis Rev iwer., -'," Reviewed by: 1 C b-( ':6 Date Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV0 1 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-27 of 54 Evaluation The evaluation consisted of the following actions: 1. Locate seismic analysis of the RWST/PWST platform, confirm the cut bracing was correctly represented in the analysis, and extract maximum (seismic + dead load) displacements.

2. Locate the RWST SQUG assessment, establish the impulsive mode frequency and the associated spectral acceleration corresponding to the frequency developed as part of the SQUG assessment.

3. Calculate the maximum RWST displacement at the platform location.4. Calculate the sum of the RWST displacement and platfrm displacement and show it is less than 1/8 inches.5. Extrapolate the finding to the vertical direction and the 1/8" gap between the RWST valve and platform member.1. Locate seismic analysis of the RWST/PWST platform, confirm the cut bracing was correctly represented in the analysis, and extract maximum (seismic + dead load) displacements.

Calculation FCX-0098-01 performed a seismic analysis of the platform.

Platform member sizes were confirmed via a walkdown.

As shown in the attached excerpts from the calculation, the cut brace was so noted and the model did not include X bracing at RWST bolt No. 29.In the model, the X-axis is perpendicular to the platform long axis, the Y-axis is in the vertical direction, and the Z-axis is along the length of the platform.The maximum horizontal displacement is 0.06115" at Joint 15.The maximum vertical displacement is 0.03252" at Joint 15.Excerpts from the analysis, including the finite element model, joint numbering, and maximum displacements are provided on the following three pages:

'ell N Y axis is vertical m CD CD'o (0 z 0 0 CD (CCD NI)0D EN-DC-168 REV 0 3 m Co CD CD Co CD 0 z o 0 ,-4 C.D CD co EN-DC-168REVO 4 SL ('I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-30 of 54 0ýCALC.4* FCX 00098 -Q#4 P.N-69982-C.NI-XC AWALKWAY PLUNTFORM aiETWEF.N RWST AND PWST!OLN'T DIS?LACEMENT (INCH RADIANS) STRI+3-- FACE ID: CON EDISON JCTUPE TYiPE -SPACE--Jil)iNT LJOJAU) ~-0N -TRANS *f -TRkN Z-MANS X -ROTAN y -ROTLAiJ.15 5 6 7 8 15 5 6 7 8 32 5 6 7 8 33 5 6 8 0.0613.5 U. 0 ()1..0.00122 0 .06098 0 0,6 111 Q 60095 0. 0022 0 '360 95 0. 04568 0 .04564 0 .00034 0 04564 0.04566 0.04563 0.030034 0.04563-0 019S9-0 03252-0 020"72-0.03252-0 .0163.6-0 02592-0.01562-0. 02592-0 00105-0.00230-0.00180-0. 00230-0.00463-0.00694-0. 00349-0.00694 0.00013 0.00011 0.00170 0. 00011 0. 001 18 0. 00116 0.00166 0. 00116 0 00222.0.00220 0.00200 0 .00220-0 .00142-0 00143 0.00196-0. 00],43 0.00003 0.00006 0.00005 0.00006 0.00005 0,00008 0.00004 0.00003-0. 00003-0.00005-0.00004-0.00005-0.00004-0.00006-0.~00003-0.00006-0.09011-0.00011 0.00000-0.0001 1-0. 0001-0.00015 0.,00001-0.00015 0 .00027 0.00027 0.00000 0 .00027 0.00029 0.00029 0.0000(0.00029 Z-ROTXN 0.00019 0.00037 0.00028 0 .00037 0.00019 0.00037 0.00028 0.00037-0.00020-0.00026-0.00009-0.00026-0-00020-0.00026-0.00009-0.00026 END QOF LATEST ANA.LYSIS RESULT 98. PRINT SUJPPORT REA(-TIONIS EN-DC-168 REV 0 5 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-31 of 54 2. The seismic analysis of the RWST, including the assessment of its anchorage is contained in Calculation 42100-C-002.

On Page 30-9 of the calculation, the impulsive mode frequency is shown to be 6.48 Hz: STEP 3: Determine the fluid-structure modal frequency for vertical carbon steel tanks containing water: R -240 taeff/A = 0.0010 ,and H I R 1.8625 From Table 7.3, lfind IF f1 -6.48 Hz.NOTE.L If the tank malariel is not carbon steel Ill not eqad to 29,000 kail or fluid is not water IGAtetMA not eqal to 82.4 IlbaMt31 the must be edlusted in accordance with the GIP STEP 3.3 OF 10 The spectral acceleration corresponding to this frequency is conservatively found to be S, = 0.21g (within 20%plus or minus of the natural frequency:

STEP 4: Determine the spectral acceleration (Sell for the fluid-structure modal frequency.

Enter the 4% danped horizontal ground oe floor response spectrum for the surface on wNich the tank is mounted, with the fluid-stmtcutse modal frequency determined in STEP 3. and determine the majoonum eeetral eoceleretion (Safi over the following frequency range:.8*Ff<F<1.2Ff

-Ff Hz < F < LZI Hr Appropriste Spectral Accaleration ISal) 0.21 g 3. The maximum displacement of the RWST at the platform location is calculated as follows:* Maximum horizontal displacement of a single degree of freedom having a frequency of 6.48 Hz is: o Max A = [S, x 386.4 in/sec 2]/( 2 x 7T x f)2 o Max A = [0.21g x 386.4 in/sec 2]/( 2 x nT x 6.48)2 = 0.04895 inches" Taking the location of the maximum displacement at 2/3 of the tank height, which is 495 inches, the displacement at the platform location (7' x 12" = 84 inches) is calculated conservatively assuming a straight line displaced shape: o 2/3 x 495 = 330" o 0.04895" x 84"/330" = 0.012 inches EN-DC-168REVO 6

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-32 of 54 4. Calculate the sum of the RWST displacement and platfrm displacement and show it is less than 1/8 inches.* Maximum displacement in the horizontal (X) direction of the platform was shown to be 0.061" under 1. above.* Maximum horizontal displacement of the tank at the 84" above the base platform elevation was calculated above as 0.012"* The sum of the two displacements, i.e., 0.06115" + 0.012" = 0.07315" < 0.12 inches.* Note: The total displacement above is conservatively calculated as the maximum platform displacement is at a point away from where the platform is close to the tank and the tank displacement was assumed to be linear rather than parabolic.

5. Extrapolate the finding to the vertical direction and the 1/8" gap between the RWST valve and platform member.* The RWST frequency in the vertical direction is > 6.48 Hz. Thus, the maximum displacement would be less that the 0.012" horizontal displacement." The maximum vertical displacement (Y-Axis) of the platform from 1. above 0.03252", much less than the 0.06115" horizontal displacement.

• Thus, the 1/8" (0.125") gap between the valve hand wheel (mounted on the tank) and platform is larger than the sum of the vertical displacements of the tank and valve and platform which we rationalized to be much less that the 0.07315" horizontal displacement.

Thus, there will be no spatial interactions between the RWST/PWST tanks and the platform located between the tanks during a postulated seismic event.EN-DC-168 REV0 7 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-33 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-08 Originating SWC/AWC SWELl -072 Equipment ID No. (3) Equip. Class 16 Equipment Description Battery Charger 21 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Condition The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the gap between Battery Charger 21 and the adjacent instrument rack west of the cabinet is 1/2" and questioned if this gap is sufficient to preclude seismic interaction.

Documents Reviewed Calculation GCC-00095-00 Original and Revised SEWS for Battery Charger 21 Licensinq Basis Structures, Systems, and Components (SSCs) must be designed such that spatial interactions, including relative displacements, under all postulated loads and load combinations, including seismic loads, do not prevent safety related SSCs from performing their intended safety function.

Applied to this particular case, the licensing basis requires that the sum of the displacements of the Battery Charger 21 and the adjacent Instrument Rack be less than the separation (gap) provided.Evaluation The evaluation concluded that the sum of the maximum displacement of Battery Charger 21 and the adjacent Instrument Rack is 0.14 inches. It is thus concluded that the 1/2" gap between the Battery Charger 21 and the adjacent Instrument Rack is sufficient to preclude spatial interactions and the condition satisfies the licensing basis.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Prepared by: Drapos A. Nuta Licensing Basis Reyie~ier

.0 Yes El No Reviewed by: Date 11/15/2012 Date ( /Peer EN-DC-168 REV 0 1 I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-34 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 Sheet 2 of 3 LICENSING BAsis EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUC~IONS EVALUATION The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the gap between Battery Charger 21 and the adjacent instrument rack west of the cabinet is 1/2" and questioned if this gap is sufficient to preclude seismic interaction.

Below, we calculate maximum displacements of the cabinet and rack and compare their sum to the existing gap.Battery Charger 21, shown below, was replaced in 1992 with a solid state model:

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-35 of 54 In Calculation GCC-00095-00, the frequesncy of the previous Westinghouse Battery Charger 21 was calculated to be 9.7 Hz.In a letter dated April 15, 1992, attached, Nick Yarnell of SCI indicated that the new Battery Charger 21 has a frequency of 10 Hz and, based on the applicable floor response seismic spectrum, the applicable seismic acceleration is 0.71g.Based on this information, we can calculate the maximum horizontal seismic displacement as: I o Max A = [Sa x 386.4 in/sec 2]/( 2 x n x f)'o Max A = [0.71g x 386.4 in/sec 2]/( 2 x n x 10)2 =0.0695 inches Per information obtained from Systems Electrical Engineering (Refer to the attached e-mail) the instrument rack adjacent to the Battery Charger 21 has Transfer Switches weighing 100 lbs or less, and mounted in the lower third of the Instrument Rack, and Junction Boxes mounted high on the Instrument Rack and weighing about 24 lbs or less. There are four (4) Transfer Switch enclosures and we consider six (6) Junction Boxes.Based on the 5441bs weight, the strong structural members, and diagonal (K) bracing on all four sides, the Instrument Panel is judged to be equal in frequency (or higher) to the Battery Charger 21 cabinet. Thus, doubling the displacement calculated above, the total displacement becomes 0.14 inches, indicating that the 1/2" (0.5") gap provided is sufficient to preclude any spatial interaction.

Concluding, the 1/2" gap between the Battery Charger 21 and the adjacent Instrument Rack is sufficient to preclude spatial interactions and the condition satisfies the licensing basis.Referenced documents are provided below.EN-DC-168 REV0 3 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-36 of 54-( Forwarded letter followa )Dates Monday, 13 April 1992 2:05pm ET Tot NUZZI.M Cc: SMITH.L Froms GJIOSJ1.D Subjects Natural freq. of SC! Cabinets Per Nick Yarnell of SCI, the Natural (or Resonant)

Frequency of SCI Battery Charger or Inverter Cabinet is approximately 1011Z.Dates Wednesday, 15 April 1992 9t46am ET Tot SHiITH.LAW, *, GHOSHI.D Froms NUZZI.M Subjects Revised "g9 value for bat. cher.Based on a frequency of 10 hz Jae per 0. Ghoah, Electrical Engineer), please use the following acceleration for the mounting of the batteryto the floors Cq -,413x x 1.5 -.71)Ref-. Weft nihouse -nalyee., elevation 33'-0, SSE condition, horizontal direation.

2% critical damping for bolted steel assemblies.

1.5 represents a modal participation factor.i requested that D. Ghoeh provide us with documentation from the manufacturer attesting to the charger natural frequency so that it can be included in the calculation.

1. a. Part/subcomponent description Solid State Controls (SCI) 460 VAC @ 60HZ 250A transformer (Model 80.2 15758-90) for battery charger.b. host equipment description:

Solid State Controls (SCI) battery charger 250A Tag number BATTCHG21.

EN-DC-168REVO 4

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-37 of 54 E-Mail from Robin Daley to D. Nuta, dated November 14,2012 This took a little more digging than I expected.

I found an older Con Edison PO for those switches but the issue is that they were assembled for us from parts and there is no specific weight mentioned for the assembled components.

From what I can find the internal circuit breaker is -31bs, and it's likely the external switch handle assembly is around 3lbs but these items are obsolete and are not in Merlin nor has google returned any useful results. The external housing is a steel NEMA 12 rated box, but no weights are listed.What may help is that they were seismically tested to IEEE 344-1975, but the results are not included in the PO package I found (obviously it had to pass but I would think there would be more information).

There is no available information on the junction boxes above them either. The tag numbers on the boxes are not in Merlin and are likely just ECRIS nodes, which wouldn't necessarily tell you about the box, just the cables.There is no manufacturer or discernable information to say what they're made of either.My best guesses would be that the switch and its internals would weigh around -100lbs. This is based on the following:

1. The box is a steel NEMA 12 box sized at 36x1 lx10. I was unable to find a match online but a 36x24x10 enclosure is 791bs per my search. This leaves us with an overly conservative weight.2. The GE type TED136YT150 breaker has a listed package weight of 31bs.3. The GE type TDA-2 handle/mechanism is obsolete but based on the size and material it would appear to be around 3lbs as well.4. The extra terminal blocks, fuses, cable and barrier boards likely add up to -10lbs.Assuming the upper junction boxes are also NEMA12, they're around 16x12x8 so around 241bs each. I based my weights of the enclosures on the following information:

http://www.deltafab.com/ProductsandServices/StandardEnclosures/NemaTvpel2SinqleDoorEnclosures/tabid/3 96/Default.aspx As always I would encourage you to second guess my estimate for thoroughness.

I have attached the original Con Edison PO to this email. The listed dimensions and materials are on page 15.Rob Daleyl Systems Engineering Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, Buchanan, NY 10511 Office: (914) 254-68171 Ernail: rdaleyl @entergy.corn EN-DC-168REVO 5

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-38 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet I of 2 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-09 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-12 Equipment ID No. SWELl-032 Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description Fuel Oil Transfer Pump D.G. 23 Location:

Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area Condition The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that One pipe is supported from another pipe. This is a non typical pipe support. Design drawings for this support were not available at time of walk down. One pipe (insulated pipe) runs to the Emergency Domestic truck fill stop valve and the other orange pipes from the EDG building to near 23FOTP.Documents Reviewed* Dwg. 9321 -F-2258* Dwg. 9321 -F-2259" Dwg. 9321-F-2260

• Technical Report No. 91177-TR-01, "Diesel Generator Fuel Oil System, Seismic Verification Summary Report," September 1991.Licensinq Basis All safety related systems and components, including piping systems, must be analyzed to show that the they will perform their safety related function under all applicable loads and load combinations, included the postulated occurrences of seismic events. In this particular case, a seismic analysis of the observed configuration would be required to document the pipe and support adequacy.Evaluation Technical Report No. 91177-TR-01, "Diesel Generator Fuel Oil System, Seismic Verification Summary Report," September 1991 analyzed the observed configuration and confirmed the pipes and supports are adequate under all postulated loads and load combinations, including OBE and DBE loads. Thus, the observed conditions are consistent with the licensing basis.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: 0 Yes El No Prepared by: Draqos A. Nuta Dý Date 11/19/2012 Licensing Basis Review r ,,a Reviewed by: C6Adj & e " I Date /(( L EeNeC 6e8R EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-39 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 Sheet 2 of 2 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS EVALUATION A picture of the observed pipe configuration is shown below: One pipe is supported from another pipe. This is a none typical pipe support.One pipe (insulated pipe) runs to the Emergency Domestic truck fill stop valve and the other orange pipe from the EDG building into ground near 23FOTP.As mentioned above, we established that Technical Report No. 91177-TR-01, "Diesel Generator Fuel Oil System, Seismic Verification Summary Report," September 1991 reports on analyses that reflected the field configuration.

A section of the report covers analyses of the 1 1/2" and 1" Diesel FO Normal and Emergency Fill Lines. The analyses confirmed that the pipes and their supports are adequate under all postulated loads and load combinations, including OBE and DBE loads.Thus, the observed condition is consistent with the licensing basis.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-40 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-10 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-35 Equipment ID No. SWEL1-005,021,022 Equip. Class 0 and 5 Equipment Description N2 Backup Control Valves, Aux Feed Pumps 21 & 22 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 17'-6" Room, Area Condition The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the 5/8"+/- diameter anchor bolts of the Fl-5004 support column are not fully engaged. (top of bolt is approximately 1/4" below the top of the nut).Documents Reviewed" Calculation IP3-CALC-MULT-00734

• EPRI Document NP-5057, Volume I" AISC, "Manual of Steel Construction," 8th and 9th Editions.Licensing Basis All safety related systems and components must be designed such that they will maintain structural integrity and perform their safety intended function under all applicable loads and load combinations, including postulated seismic event occurrences.

In this particular case, the bolt engagement should be sufficient to provide the tension capacity developed under a postulated seismic event.Evaluation The tension loading of the bolts anchoring the base plate for Instrument Fl-5004 is very small, as discussed in the attached evaluation.

As such, given that a recess of 0.172" for a 5/8" diameter bolt does not reduce the bolt tension capacity, the 8/100" larger recess observed is acceptable and we conclude that the observed condition is consistent with the licensing basis.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: X Yes Ll No Prepared by: Dra-qos A. Nuta Date 11/19/2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: a vt' ýr(( Date Id 1 &Peer ewer EN-DC-168 REV0 1 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-41 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 Sheet 2 of 3 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS EVALUATION The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the 5/8"+/- diameter anchor bolts of F1-5004 support column are not fully engaged. (top of bolt is approximately Y4" below the top of the nut).5/8"+/- diameter anchor bolts of FI-5004 support column are not fully engaged. (Missing about X').In accordance with Calculation IP3-CALC-MULT-00734 Page 7 of 8, a recess of 0.172 inches does not affect the 5/8" diameter bolt tension capacity.Furthermore, as seen from the picture above, due to limited supported weights, the base plate loads and induced tension in the bolts during a postulated seismic event are minimal. Therefore, exceeding the maximum recess for which the bolt tension capacity is not reduced by approximately 8/100 of an inch (0.25" -0.172" = 0.08") is acceptable.

IP3-CALC-MULT-00734 Page 7 of 8 is attached hereafter.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-42 of 54 NewYorkPower AAhuithm AC4.e_ flit 7iý, jjA 7'MJJA --P~q..____if- .A ..iL M A ?~ --- -_I____l j i 7~____ 2.l L-AL L 3 EN-DC-168 REV 0 3 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-43 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 2 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-1 1 Originating SWC/AWC SWELl -077 Equipment ID No. 0022EDG Equip. Class 17 Equipment Description Diesel Generator No. 22 Location:

Bldg. EDG Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area Condition The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the EDG exhaust pipe is supported on a post frame that also supports fuse panel for 22 Pre Lube Pump, 22 Lube oil HTR, and 22 Jacket Water HTR. This support has damaged & missing grout under the eastern post base plate.Documents Reviewed" Calculation GCC-00125-00

• Calculation GCC-00176-00

• Calculation GCC-00025-00, "Support for Diesel Generator Main Exhaust Pipe."* Dwg. 3627-6A" Dwg. A250500-00 Licensing Basis All safety related systems and components must be designed such that they will maintain structural integrity and perform their safety intended function under all applicable loads and load combinations, including postulated seismic event occurrences.

In this particular case, the grout pad must have the required compression capacity and stability to withstand compression forces developed under a postulated seismic event.Evaluation Based on calculation GCC-00025-00, the load acting on the base plate and grout is minimal Furthermore, considering the 5000 psi compressive strength of the grout, and the more that 75% of the base plate area supported on grout, the compression capacity of the grout is more than sufficient to withstand the acting loads. Thus, the condition is in accordance with the IP2 licensing basis.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Z Yes 0 No Prepared by: Draqos A. Nuta Date 11/19/2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: ( .Date 11//A rn 1 7 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-44 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIs EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 2 of 2 EVALUATION Based on calculation GCC-00025-00, the load acting upon the 6 x 6 x 1/4 TS that distributes the load to the two support columns is 1100 lbs vertical and 570 lbs horizontal with an interaction ratio of 0.07 vs the 1.0 allowable.

Distributed to the two support columns, the loading per column is 550 lbs vertical and 285 lbs horizontal.

In addition to the minimal loading on the grout, considering the 5000 psi compressive strength of the grout, the more that 75% of the base plate area supported on grout provides more than sufficient support for the acting loads, as only 3 inches squares of grout provide a compressive capacity of 15,000 pounds. Thus, the condition is in accordance with the IP2 licensing basis.EN-DC-168 REV 0 2 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-45 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet I of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-12 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-35 Equipment ID No. SWELl -005,021,022 Equip. Class 0 and 5 Equipment Description N2 Backup Control Valves, Aux Feed Pumps 21 & 22 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 17'-6" Room, Area Condition The Seismic Walkdown Team noted at Elev. 18'-6" of the AFB that There is a 2%" outside diameter pipe connecting to PCV-1 284 which appears to have excessive unsupported length.. From the first support, the pipe has a 21/ ' horizontal run, a 3' vertical run and a 21/2/2 horizontal run at which point it connects to a heavy valve and two large diameter flanges.After that, there is a 6" vertical run of 7/8" OD tubing followed by a 2/' run of 7/8" OD tubing to the next support.Documents Reviewed Since the observation related to non-threaded piping, which is not within the scope of the seismic walkdowns, a separate walkdown of the area was performed.

Licensing Basis All safety related systems and components must be designed such that they will maintain structural integrity and perform their safety intended function under all applicable loads and load combinations, including postulated seismic event occurrences.

In this particular case, the piping spans must be such that pipe stresses are within code allowables.

Evaluation A subsequent walkdown of the pipe location by members of the IPEC Design Engineering Department certified for performance of the Seismic Walkdowns, assessed the configuration and found that: (1) spans are not excessive for the 2 3/4" diameter pipe, for which a span of 8'-0" would not be questionable, (2) the in-line loads are not excessive, and (3) the configuration is acceptable.

As the piping under consideration does not have excessive unsupported lengths, we find the configuration acceptable and within the IP2 licensing basis.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing B sl

• ZYes E- No Prepared by: Drapos A. Nuta Date 11/19/2012 Licensing Basis iew Reviewed by: -rd 7c\ Date "1 2.Peer Revie EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-46 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 2 of 3 EVALUATION The Seismic Walkdown Team noted at Elev. 18'-6" of the AFB that There is a 2W" outside diameter pipe connecting to PCV-1284 which appears to have excessive unsupported length.. From the first support, the pipe has a 2Y2 ' horizontal run, a 3' vertical run and a 2X 'horizontal run at which point it connects to a heavy valve and two large diameter flanges. After that, there is a 6" vertical run of 7/8" OD tubing followed by a 2Y'run of 7/8" OD tubing to the next support.A picture of the piping, located at the southern end of the AFB Elev. 18'-6", is provided below: Support I3 A subsequent watkdown of the pipe location by members of the IPEC Design Engineering Department certified for performance of the Seismic Walkdowns, assessed the configuration and found that: (1) spans are not excessive for the 2 3/4" diameter pipe, for which a span of 8'-0" would not be questionable, (2) the in-line loads are not excessive, and (3) the configuration is acceptable.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-47 of 54 As the piping under consideration does not have excessive unsupported lengths, we find the configuration acceptable and within the IP2 licensing basis.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-48 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet I of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-13 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-35 Equipment ID No. SWELl-005,021,022 Equip. Class 0 and 5 Equipment Description N2 Backup Control Valves, Aux Feed Pumps 21 & 22 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 17'-6" Room, Area Condition The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that Long span 5/8" OD" tubing has little separation and typical span length of eight feet .The tubes will interact with each other during seismic event. There are also 3/8" OD tubes also in close proximity to each other which have similar unsupported spans.Documents Reviewed A separate walkdown was performed by a team of engineers qualified to perform seismic walkdowns.

Licensing Basis All safety related systems and components must be designed such that they will maintain structural integrity and perform their safety intended function under all applicable loads and load combinations, including postulated seismic event occurrences.

In this particular case, the tubing spans between supports must be such that tubing maintains structural integrity.

Evaluation A subsequent walkdown of the tubing locations by members of the IPEC Design Engineering Department certified for performance of the Seismic Walkdowns, assessed the configurations and found that: (1) The tubing spans are not excessive, (2) all tubes in close proximity have common supports and spans, and (3) the separation is such that any impact of adjacent tubes under a seismic event will be associated with extremely small impact forces while eliminating any possible resonance and enhancing the system damping. As such, the configurations were found to be configuration acceptable and within the IP2 licensing basis.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Prepared by: Draqos A. Nuta Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Richard Peer Reviewer EYes l No Date 11/20/2012 Date 11/20/2012 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-49 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 2 of 3 EVALUATION The Seismic Walkdown Team noted that Long span 5/8" OD" tubing has little separation and typical span length of eight feet .The tubes will interact with each other during seismic event.There are also 3/8" OD tubes also in close proximity to each other which have similar unsupported spans. Photographs of the tubing configurations, contained in AWC-35 are provided below: Long span tubing has little separation

(< 1/2') .They will be interacting with each other during a seismic event.Tubing with excessive distance between supports at entry to room.EN-DC-168 REV 0 2 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-50 of 54 A subsequent walkdown of the tubing locations by members of the IPEC Design Engineering Department certified for performance of the Seismic Walkdowns, was performed.

Approximations of the tubing spans made by the original walkdown team that prepared AWC-35 were reviewed against the tubing layouts. The new inspections established that:* In general, the tubing is supported at 6 ft to 8 ft intervals or less" no excessive lengths were identified." spans satisfy guidance as to spans for seismic supports in CES-8 standard covering tubing design and installation, including the 10 ft or less horizontal and 13 ft or less vertically for 3/8" tubing, and 13 ft or less horizontally and 16 ft or less vertically for 5/8" tubing.: As mentioned above, the assessment of the configurations found that: 1) The tubing spans are not excessive, (2) all tubes in close proximity have common supports and spans, and 3) the separation is such that any impact of adjacent tubes against each other under a postulated seismic event will be associated with extremely small impact forces while eliminating any possible resonance and enhancing the system damping.As such, the configurations were found to be acceptable and within the IP2 licensing basis.EN-DC-168 REV0 3 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-51 of 54 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIs EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-14 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-017 Equipment ID No. SWELl-020, 090 Equip. Class 5. 20 Equipment Description 21 & 22 Safety Injection Pumos Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-0" Room, Area Safety Iniection Pump Room Condition While performing an area walkby of Elevation 59-0" of the PAB, the Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the HVAC ductwork adjacent to the stairs does not have any lateral support from the base to beyond the first elbow at the top. The span appears to be excessive.

Documents Reviewed" Dwg. 9321-F-4036" Dwg. 9321-F-4037" Dwg. 9321 -F-4038* Dwg. 9321 -F-4039* AISC Steel Book" Technical Report No. 92128-TR-01, "Indian Point Unit 2, Licensing Basis In-Structure Response Spectra." Licensing Basis All safety related systems and components must be designed such that they will maintain structural integrity and perform their safety intended function under all applicable loads and load combinations, including postulated seismic event occurrences.

In this particular case, the duct span between supports must be such that duct maintains structural integrity.

Evaluation The evaluation established that the vertical span is not excessive and, under a postulated seismic occurrence, the stresses in the duct are very low. As such, the configuration was found to be acceptable and within the IP2 licensing basis.Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis, 0 Yes E] No Prepared by: Draaos A. Nuta Date 11/20/2012 Licensing Basis iew.r Reviewed by: Ric: .Drake Date 11/20/2012 Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-52 of 54 EVALUATION While performing an area walkby of Elevation 59"-0" of the PAB, the Seismic Walkdown Team noted that the HVAC ductwork adjacent to the stairs does not have any lateral support from the base to beyond the first elbow at the top. The span appears to be excessive.

Picture taken by the walkdown team, as contained in AWC-17 are shown below: Based on Section D-D of Dwag. 9321-F-4039, the duct is anchored at the 59'-0" floor with the top of duct at Elev. 60'-4" and the bottom of the top duct extending from the support shown in the picture above is at Elevation 74'-11" -10" = 74'.Thus, the vertical span extends from Elev 74' toElev. 60'-4" .The unsupported vertical span is approximately 13'-8". Based on Section C 7.5. 5 of ASCE 4 2012(Standard covering the Seismic Design and Analysis of Nuclear Facilities), SMACNA covers duct support spacing of 10 ft, 12 ft, 15 ft, 20 ft, and 25 ft. Thus, a span of 13 ft is within the range of duct spans covered by SMACNA: 2 I Engineering Report No, IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-53 of 54 7.5 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 7.5.1 Introduction The scope of this section considers portions of mechanical and electrical distribution systems requiring seismic analysis and design,. and is limited to piping, tubing. ductwork.

mad raceways and their supports.

For seismic design and analysis purposes.these distribution systems shall be divided into five categories.

SDC-5 through SDC-1. consistent with ASCE/SEI Standard 43-05. As described in this section- appropriate analytical procedures shall be used to determine the forces and nionients at various limiting locations in distribution systems as well as at mid on their supports.

Not included in this scope of the Section are mechanical, electrical and instnrnentation and control components or devices not otherwise identified in the scope.C7.5.5 Ductwork The design of nuclear safety-related duct is usually governed by one of two codes -SMWCNA (C7.5-12) or ASME AG-I (C7.5-13).

A subsection of the 1980 SM.CNA code for rectangular ducts (C7.5-14)provides guidance as to the resultant deadweight load as a function of rectangular duct dimension for support spacing of 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, and 30 feet. A similar standard is available for round duct (C7.5-15).

Transverse and longitudinal horizontal support spacing as a function of one of three seismic hazard levels is defined in the SMACNA code (C7.5-16).

As an altenmative to this code for round duct design, the ASME B31.3 piping code is sometimes used. When using the piping code, care must be taken concerning the elastic stability of thin wall pipe when D/t ratios are greater than 50.The ASME AG-1 standard provides (1) an alternative ASME-dev eloped procedure for the construction of duct in the form of allowable stresses in the duct for design by analysis, (2) duct system finite-element modeling procedure recommendations.

and (3)testing procedures for design by testing. However, this standard does not provide specific guidance on seismic support spacing -either vertical, transverse.

or 15 In order to ascertain that the duct will maintain structural integrity under a postulated seismic event, we obtained structural parameters from HVAC personnel as follows: The duct is 18 gage construction with 1 1/2" x 1/8" corner angles. The wide side has diagonal creases to enhance integrity.

3 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page F-54 of 54 Based on this information, we considered seismic loads consisting of a horizontal response spectrum peak for 1% damping of 1.0g (conservative for Elev. 59' of the PAB) and a verical seismic acceleration of 2/3 (1.0g) = 0.66g vertical acceleration.

Parameters for the duct are as follows: " 18gage steel o thickness

= 0.0478 inch o weight per square foot = 2 #/ft 2* The 1 1/2" x 1/8" corner angles: o weight per foot = 1.23 #/ft o Ix = ly = 0.078 in 4 o Area, A = 0.359 in 2* Perimeter of the duct is 64" = 5.33 ft* Height = 13'-8" = 13.667 ft" Weight of vertical duct = 13.667' x 5.33' x 2 #/ft 2 = 146 lbs.* Weight of the corner angles: o 4x13.67ftx1.23#/ft=671bs

• Total weight of the duct = 146 lbs + 67 lbs = 213 lbs* Considering a horizontal earthquake with 1.0g horizontal acceleration and a vertical earthquake with a vertical acceleration of 2/3 (1.0g), we calculate the section properties for the duct, the maximum bending moment and axial compression and then assess the resulting stresses in the duct: o Considering only the corner angles, the moment of inertia about the weak axis (10" depth) is: o 4 (1,) + 4 (Ao x d 2) =4(0.078)

+ 4( 0.359 x 5 2) = 0.312 + 35.9 = 36.2 in 4 o Section Modulus S li/d = 36.2 / 5 = 7.24 in 3 o Cross-sectional area is A plate + Area angles 0 64x 0.0478 + 4 x 0.359 = 3 + 1.47 = 4.5 in 2" We now establish the axial load under Dead Load + Vertical Seismic load and the bending moment under a horizontal 1.0g seismic acceleration:

o Under a horizontal uniform load of 213 lbs/13.67 ft = 16#/ft = 1.31 #/inch, the bending moment considering simply supported span (conservative assumption) is w 12/8 = 1.31 x 1642/8 = 4404 # inch.o Thus, Mmax = 4404 # x inch o Compressive (axial) stresses under DL + vertical earthquake acceleration: " Axial load = 2/3(1.0g) x 213 # + 213# = 356 Ibs" Compressive stress, aa, given the 4.5 in 2 area is 356/4.5 = 79 psi o Compressive stress from bending is ab = MmaX/S = 4404/7.24

= 608 psi* Total compressive stress under axial load and bending is: o Otot = oa + ob = 60 8 psi + 79 psi = 6 8 7 psi A compressive stress of 687 psi on the comer angles is very low and acceptable.

Thus, we confirm the 13'-8" span is acceptable and the configuration satisfies the IP 2 licensing basis.4 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. 0 Page G-I of 5 ATTACHMENT G -PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page G-2 of 5 ATTACHMENT 9.10 PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Instructions for Completing Checklist This peer review checklist may be used to document the review of the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) in accordance with EPRI 1025286, Section 6: Peer Review. The space below each question in this checklist should be used to describe any findings identified during the peer review process and how the SWEL may have changed to address those findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Were the five safety functions adequately represented in the SWEL 1 selection?

YE NEI All five safety functions were adequately represented in SWEL-1 2. Does SWEL 1 include an appropriate representation of items having the following sample selection attributes:

a. Various types of systems?Various types of systems such as mechanical, electrical, control units etc. were considered Y[ NEI b. Major new and replacement equipment?

New/replacement equipment were represented (ex EDG thermostat, solenoid valve etc. see Base List 1)YZ NEI c. Various types of equipment?

Various types of equipment were represented on the SWEL-1, such as fuel oil transfer pump, water pump, boric acid blender, solenoid valve, fan, circuit breaker, relay cabinet, MCC, switchgear, etc.YE NEI EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page G-3 of 5 ATTACHMENT 9.10 PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL d. Various environments?

YOZ N[Il Various environments were considered.

e. Equipment enhanced based on the findings of the IPEEE (or equivalent) program? YEI NO There were no findings from IPEEE for Unit 2 f. Were risk insights considered in the development of SWEL 1? YO NEIl Yes, risk insights were considered in the development of SWEL-1 3. For SWEL 2: a. Were spent fuel pool related items considered, and if applicable included in YE Nil SWEL 2?b. Was an appropriate justification documented for spent fuel pool related items not YO NEIl included in SWEL 2?Yes, as shown in Table 4, Attachment B EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page G-4 of 5 ATTACHMENT 9.10 Sheet 3 of 4 PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL FORM Peer Review Checklist for SWEL 4. Provide any other comments (Attachment 9.11) related to the peer review of the SWELs.The development of SWEL- I and SWEL-2 was conducted in satisfaction of the EPRI guidance.YO N[il 5. Have all peer review comments been adequately addressed in the final SWEL?Peer Reviewer #1: Tom Panavotidi Peer Reviewer #2: Kenneth Whitmore WJ +/ oreo-Date: 11/07/2012 Date: 11/07/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page G-5 of 5 ATTACHMENT 9.10 PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Instructions The following instructions are meant to aid in completing the form and a guideline pertaining to the type and amount of information that is to be placed in each section of the checklist.

For all items in the checklist, identify whether the action has been completed and provide comments and/or discussions with the Seismic Walkdown Team that can be considered applicable to answer the item in the checklist.

NOTE Add additional SWEL Peer Reviewers to the Peer Review Checklist form as required Peer Reviewer #1: -The SWEL Peer Reviewer shall print and sign their name and include the date that the review was complete.Peer Reviewer #2: -The SWEL Peer Reviewer shall print and sign their name and include the date that the review was complete.EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT H -REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESOLUTION FORM Engineerng Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENT 9.11 PEER REVIEW COMMENT FORM Sheet 1 of I/trSeismic Walkdown Submittal Report Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. Title: Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Report Number 0 Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Quality Related: :1 Yes No Special Notes or Instructions:

N/A Comment Section/Page No. Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials I SWELI-013

0. 3, Q.4: provide a statement on the condition of the Statement on the condition of the anchorage, anchorage has been added. ? .Provide the name of the SWE's on pg. 3 SWEs are noted on page 3.2 SWELl-014 Q. 3, Q.4: provide a statement on the condition of the Statement on the condition of the anchorage.

anchorage has been added.Provide the name of the SWE's on pg. 3 SWEs are noted on page 3.3 SWELl -015 0.4: provide a statement on the condition of the Statement on the condition of the anchorage.

anchorage has been added. rj Provide the name of the SWE's on pg. 3 SWEs are noted on page 3.4 SWELl-016 Provide the name of the SWE's on pg, 3 SWEs are noted on page 3. .5 SWELl-017 0.2, Q.3: provide a statement on the condition of the Statement on the condition of the anchorage.

anchorage has been added.Provide the name of the SWE's on pg. 3 SWEs are noted on page 3.6 SWELl-018 Q.2, Q.3: provide a statement on the condition of the Statement on the condition of the anchorage.

anchorage has been added.7 SWELl-019 0.2, 0.4: provide a statement on the condition of the Statement on the condilion of the anchorage.

anchorage has been added.Provide the name of the SWE's on pg. 3 SWEs are noted on page 3.8 SWELl-032 Q.2: provide a statement on the condition of the Statement on the condition of the anchorage.

anchorage has been added.Provide the name of the SWE's on pg. 3 SWEs are noted on page 3.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineerng Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 3 of 3 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report Entergy Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. Title: Indian Point Energy Center. Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Report Number 0 Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Quality Related: Ej Yes 0 No Special Notes or Instructions:

N/A Comment Section/Page No. Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials 9 SWEL 1-035, SWEL 0.2 Q.3 and 04: provide a statement on the condition of Statement on the condition of the 1-036, SWEL 1-047, the anchorage.

anchorage has been added.SWEL 1-051, SWEL Provide the name of the SWE's on pg. 3 SWEs are noted on page 3.1-059, SWEL 1-060, SWEL 1-061, SWEL 1-065, SWEL 1-066, SWEL 1-068. SWEL 1-084, SWEL 1-089, SWEL 1-099, and SWEL 1-100.10 AWC-06 0.4 e indicate "not an adverse seismic condition" Statement added "This is not a seismic -.}3-p concern Reviewed By: Pouria Pourghobadi

", e 1 11/14/2012 Resolved By: I Paul Huebsch _ _ 1 ,/Site/Department:

IPEC/ENERCON Ph. Date: 11/14/2012 9 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page I-1 of 9 ATTACHMENT I -SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES EU ENERCON Certificate of Completion is he eby granted to Steve Yuan for successful completion uf TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/26/2012 in Mt Arlington, NJ Certified Seis-ic Walkdown Aleitardria, VA -6/20,2012 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-I 2-00037 Rev. 0 Page 1-2 of 9 0 ENERCON Exceltence--Evety opojecc fvery day Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Tom Panayotidi for successful comipletion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 9/13/2012 in Mt.Arlington, NJ Alex Sgnerch Certified Seismic Walxdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdow~ Engineer PaloAlto CA- 6/13/2012 PaloAlto, CA -6/13/2012 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 1-3 of 9 ExNERnCON

"

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 1-4 of 9 0 ENERCON[Kcelle'nr-Eve rypfaect Fvefy day Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Paul Huebsch for %uccessful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 9/13/2012 in Mt. Arlington.

NI K "n Bessell Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA -6/13/2012 Alex Srnerch Certified Seisno Walkdow, Engineer Palo Alto. CA -6/13/2012 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 1-5 of 9 OENERCON Exceflence-fvery pro)ect Every doy Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Pouria Pourghobadi fur s.'cessful cumpletion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded. 9/13/2012 in Mt- Arlington, NJ Certified Seinsic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA -1/13/2012 Alex Smerch Certified Seismic Walldow Engineer Palo Afto, CA -EV1312012 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 1-6 of 9 ii Certificate of Completion Kenneth Whitmore Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3-Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 21, 2012 ftabod K. Kanamm.EPqJ k~naer.SkxUWn Re"By Ma kiy it' ---

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 1-7 of 9 F13 ENERCON E.,cettcnce--

very p!'Djc Ev'4;-: vd Certificate of Completion is herehy grnmted 1-j Kirit Parikh for successful completl ion ol'TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 9/28/2012 in Nape.'riIle, I1 Kcvin EBesselI Ceilitled Sosmic Walkdown Engineer P,13Alto.

CA -6/13/2012 Alex Smerch Certlied Seimic W.a lkdown Engineer PaloAlto.

CA 6113/2012 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 1-8 of 9 BOUG CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT Tills IS TO CnrfTIfI THAT o-Yag e4. &~mt HAS COMPLETED THE SQUG WALKDOWN SCREENING AND SEISMIC EVALUATION TRAINING COURSE AUGUST 16, 2001-dw MWak k"cz Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 1-9 of 9 Certificate of Completion Richard Drake Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3-Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 19, 2012 Oat, Rob.,1 K. IK*$w, EFRI MwOM.g, Rlt~wdStt4&ty a lmtwky ATTACHMENT TO NL-12-167 LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 NL-12-167 Docket No. 50-247 Attachment Page 1 of 1 List of Regulatory Commitments The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document.Any other statements in this submittal are provided for information purposes and are not considered to be regulatory commitments.

TYPE (Check One) SCHEDULED COMPLETION COMMITMENT ONE- DATE TIME CONTINUING (If Required)ACTION COMPLIANCE Entergy will perform walkdowns for equipment On a schedule that could not be inspected as identified in specified in Section Section 6.3 of the Seismic Walkdown Report. 6.3 of the Seismic Walkdown Report On a schedule Entergy will submit an updated Seismic specified in Section Walkdown Report. 6.3 of the Seismic Walkdown Report Entergy will resolve the potentially adverse seismic conditions (i.e., condition reports that identified a potentially adverse seismic Six months after the condition) as identified in Section 8.2 of the next refuel outage Seismic Walkdown Report. These are identified in CR-IP2-2012-6117 and 6616.