NL-14-071, Indian Point, Unit 2 - Seismic Walkdown Report Update, Enclosure to NL-14-071 - Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev 1. Part 1 of 5

Indian Point, Unit 2 - Seismic Walkdown Report Update, Enclosure to NL-14-071 - Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev 1. Part 1 of 5

ML14168A059
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	06/05/2014
From:	Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-071 IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev 1
Download: ML14168A059 (266)

Text

ENCLOSURE TO NL-14-071 INDIAN POINT UNIT NO. 2 SEISMIC WALKDOWN REPORT UPDATE ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 Remote User sprussm READ-ONLY-IP-RPT-12-00037 Ri EC49852.pdf 06/02/14 12:38 PM

~' En ter~,y Engineering Report No. IP-R.PT-1i2-0)0037 Rev I Page I _of 37 ENTERGY NUCLEAR Engineering Report Cover Sheet Engineering Report Title: Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term

'ask Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Engineering Report Type: New FD Revision [ Cancelled

[ Superseded Superseded by: Applicable Site(s)11 ipt LI ANNl LI EC No. 4,9852 ANO2 El IP3 LI ECH Ej JAFElI GGNS [I PNPS LI RBS LI vyL WF3 L WPo LI PLP LI Report Origin: Quality-Related:

El Entergy RI Vendor Vendor Document No.: N/A LI Yes 0 No Prepared by: Reviewed by: Reviewed by: ,z\pprov.ed by: Apved dv: Magg'¶e Staub (ENERCON)Kai Lo (Reviewer.

ENTERGY)Date: 3/I18/2014 Date: 3/18/2014 Date: 3!1 f/2014 Date: 3/ 8/201 -4.are; Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 2 of 37' Eniety, UqJIitr-zicrxr.

~ Si*Pw~9 T FY1TRGV ~tcig*p F-,,Ainrrlb R~jm, ttfri Jt~iniP~k tmrNy fC narL Na2S;h fknituw.f of Fatakiin NeirTn Tt. F-n £&ereamI~, (M2Stw Nil: r~'- Cu LI-~ *j;j ANPC Lv lAd Li¶iCiNS [3 p4 s~i c'7 ICr fl4)p4j iz~Iiflv~Js I ~) /7 4-fflAWITOUN, Si,~ r rsn.U t fl I l 114 Thn n Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 3 of 37 Revision Description of Change 0 Initial issue 1 Report revised to include inspection of deferred items before and during refueling outage 2R21.Revised Table of Content, Table 4-1, Table 4-2, and other misc. changes denoted with revision bars.Added new sections 4.2.1, 4.3.1, 6.3.1, 7.1.1, 8.1.1, 8.3.1, 8.4.1, 8.5.1, and 9.2.3.1.Modified Attachment I Added Attachments J, K, L and M.R1 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 37 Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report For Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 S C O P E A N D O B JE C T IV E ....................................................................................................................

5 2.0 SEISM IC LICENSING BASIS SUM MARY ..........................................................................................

6 2.1 SAFE SHUTDOW N EARTHQUAKE (SSE) ......................................................................................

6 2.2 DESIGN CODES, STANDARDS AND METHODS .........................................................................

6 3.0 SEISMIC WALKDOWN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH ..............................................

9 4.0 PER SO N N E L Q UA LIFICA TIO NS ........................................................................................................

10 4.1 EQ UIPM ENT SELECTIO N PERSO NNEL ......................................................................................

13 4.2 SEISM IC W A LKDOW N ENG INEERS ............................................................................................

13 4.3 LIC E N S ING BA S IS R EV IEW E RS .....................................................................................................

14 4 .4 IP E E E R E V IE W E R S ........................................................................................................................

14 5.0 IPEEE VULNERA BILITIES REPO RTING ........................................................................................

16 6.0 SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LIST DEVELOPMENT

.........................................................

17 6.1 SAMPLE OF REQUIRED ITEMS FOR THE FIVE SAFETY FUNCTIONS

....................................

17 6 .2 S P E N T F U E L P O O L IT E M S .............................................................................................................

19 6.3 DEFERRED INACCESSIBLE ITEMS on SWEL ............................................................................

21 7.0 SEISMIC WALKDOWNS AND AREA WALK-BYS ...........................................................................

24 7.1 S E IS M IC W A LK D O W N S ..................................................................................................................

24 7 .2 A R E A W A LK -B Y S ............................................................................................................................

2 6 8.0 LIC EN S ING BA S IS EVA LUATIO N S ....................................................................................................

27 8.1 C O N D IT IO N ID E NT IFIC A T IO N ........................................................................................................

27 8.2 C O N D ITIO N R E SO LU T IO N .............................................................................................................

28 R 8.3 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATIO NS .............................................................................................

28 8.4 CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM ENTRIES ..............................................................................

28 8 .5 P LA N T C H A N G E S ...........................................................................................................................

30 9 .0 P E E R R E V IE W ...................................................................................................................................

3 0 9.1 P EE R R EV IEW P RO C E S S ..............................................................................................................

30 9.2 PEER REVIEW OF SEISMIC WALKDOWNS AND WALK-BYS .....................................................

31 10 .0 R E F E R E N C E S ...................................................................................................................................

36 A T T A C H M E N T S .........................................................................................................................................

3 7 ATTACHMENT A -IPEEE VULNERABILITIES TABLE ............................................................................

37 ATTACHMENT B -SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LISTS ...........................................................

37 ATTACHMENT C -SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCs) .........................................................

37 ATTACHMENT D -AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs) .................................................................

37 ATTACHMENT E -POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS

................................................

37 ATTACHMENT F -LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS .............................................................

37 ATTACHMENT G -PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL ...............................................................

37 ATTACHMENT H -REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESOLUTIONS FORM .................................................

37 ATTACHMENT I -SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES

..............................

37 ATTACHMENT J -DEFERRED SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCs) .........................................

37 ATTACHMENT K -DEFERRED AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs) ..............................................

37 ATTACHMENT L -DEFERRED WALKDOWNS POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITION

...........

37 ATTACHMENT M -DEFERRED WALKDOWNS LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS .................

37 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 5 of 37 1.OSCOPE AND OBJECTIVE The Great Tohoku Earthquake of March 11, 2011 and the resulting tsunami caused an accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan. In response to this accident, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) established the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF). The NTTF was tasked with conducting a systematic and methodical review of NRC processes and regulations and determining if the agency should make additional improvements to its regulatory system. On March 12, 2012 the NRC issued a 10CFR50.54(f)

Letter [Ref. 1] requesting information from all licensees to support the NRC staffs evaluation of several of the NTTF recommendations.

To support NTTF Recommendation 2.3, Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f) Letter requested that all licensees perform seismic walkdown inspections of the plant to gather and report information related to degraded, non-conforming, or unanalyzed conditions with respect to its current seismic licensing basis.The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), with support and direction from the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), published industry guidance for conducting and documenting the seismic walkdowns which represented the results of extensive interaction between NRC, NEI, and other stakeholders.

This industry guidance document, EPRI Report 1025286 [Ref. 2], hereafter referred to as "the Guidance," was formally endorsed by the NRC on May 31, 2012.Entergy Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 has committed to using this NRC-endorsed guidance as the basis for conducting and documenting seismic walkdowns for resolution of NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. To this end, Entergy has prepared Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walk-down Procedure EN-DC-168 to govern the performance of the seismic walkdowns and preparation of the seismic report.The objective of this report is to document the results of the seismic walkdown effort undertaken for resolution of NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic in accordance with the Guidance and under the guidance of Entergy procedure EN-DC-168, and provide the information necessary for responding to Enclosure 3 to the 50.54() Letter.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 6 of 37 2.OSEISMIC LICENSING BASIS

SUMMARY

Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 is a pressurized water reactor (PWR) located in Buchanan, New York. The Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) was originally designed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation.

The Indian Point Energy Center consists of two similar units, Units 2 and 3, and Unit 1 which is decommissioned.

Unit 2 began commercial operation in September of 1973, and is currently rated at 1078 MW electric output from the turbine-generator

[Ref. 3]. This section summarizes the seismic licensing basis of structures, systems and components (SSCs) at Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 which bound the context of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program.2.1 SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE (SSE)The safe shutdown earthquake for the Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 site conforms to the average of response spectra developed by Housner and is anchored at 0.15g peak horizontal ground acceleration and 0.10g peak vertical ground acceleration

[Ref. 3].2.2 DESIGN CODES, STANDARDS AND METHODS Seismic Class I is defined as those structures and components including instruments and controls whose failure might cause or increase the severity of a loss-of-coolant accident or result in an uncontrolled release of radioactivity causing more than 10 rem to the thyroid or 10 rem whole body to the average adult beyond the nearest site boundary.

Also included are those structures and components vital to safe shutdown and isolation of the reactor.The criteria for functional adequacy of structures, equipment, piping, instrumentation, and controls follow: No loss of function implies that rotating equipment will not freeze, pressure vessels will not rupture, supports will not collapse under the load, systems required to be leak-tight will remain leak-tight, and components required to respond actively (such as valves and relays)will respond actively.

The criteria for functional adequacy of the structures state that stresses will not exceed yield when subjected to 0.15g horizontal ground acceleration.

The manner in which these criteria have been met is by limiting stresses in seismic Class I structures to meet the above criteria.

For all seismic Class I piping and their supports, the criteria for functional adequacy and the manner in which the criteria are met are the following:

with a ground acceleration of 0.15g horizontal, the spectral acceleration corresponding to the maximum point on the 0.5-percent critical damping response curve was used to calculate an equivalent static force imparted to the pipe at its support points. This resulted in a seismic design load approximately equal to 0.6W horizontally and 0.4W vertically taken simultaneously where W is the weight of the pipe including static forces. The sum of the resulting additional stress plus the normal stresses was limited to 1.2 times the B31.1 code Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 7 of 37 allowable.

The stresses in the pipe supports and hangers were likewise limited to 1.2 times the B31.1 code allowable.

Since all the buildings containing seismic Class I piping are essentially rigid structures, no amplification is expected.For seismic Class I equipment and tanks the same method was used to arrive at an equivalent static force. In each case, the total of seismic and normal stresses was limited to the applicable code allowable.

The refueling water storage tank and condensate storage tank were designed in accordance with the stress limitations of American Water Works Association Standard D100. All components of the reactor coolant system and associated systems are designed to the standards of the applicable ASME code or USAS code. The loading combinations, which are employed in the design of seismic Class I components of these systems, i.e., vessels, piping, supports, vessel internals and other applicable components, are given in FSAR Table 1.11-2 of the UFSAR. Table 1.11-2 also indicates the stress limits, which are used in the design of the listed equipment for the various loading combinations.

The original design criteria given above and in Table 1.11-2 have been modified in certain instances in accordance with NRC guidance given in FSAR References 3 and 4. Generic Letter 87-11 allows for the elimination of pipe whip restraints and jet impingement shields, which were installed to mitigate the effects of arbitrary intermediate pipe ruptures, provided certain criteria are met.These design criteria have also been modified in certain instances by the application of "leak before break" technology.

To be able to perform their function, i.e., allow core shutdown and cooling the reactor vessel internals must satisfy deformation limits, which are more restrictive than the stress limits The design of seismic Class I structures and components utilizes the "response spectrum" approach in the analysis of the dynamic loads imparted by the earthquake.

The analysis is based upon the response spectra shown on Figures 1.11-1 and 1.11-2 of the UFSAR. The following method of analysis is applied to seismic Class I structures and components including instrumentation:

The natural period of vibration of the structure or component is determined.

The response acceleration of the component to the seismic motion is taken from the response spectrum curve at the appropriate period.Stresses and deflections resulting from the combined influence of normal loads and the seismic load due to the Design Earthquake (0.05g acting in the vertical and 0.10g acting in the horizontal planes simultaneously) are calculated and checked against the limits imposed by the design standard.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 8 of 37 Stresses and deflections resulting from the combined influence of normal loads and the seismic loads due to the maximum potential earthquake (0.10g acting in the vertical and 0.15g acting in the horizontal planes simultaneously) are calculated and checked to verify that deflections do not cause loss of function and that stresses do not produce rupture.Where the vibrator system is of a highly complex geometric shape, such as piping systems, the maximum response from the response curve with the appropriate damping factor is selected.

By using this conservative value and demonstrating that the stresses are satisfactory, it becomes unnecessary to perform any further analysis to determine the natural periods of the system.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 9 of 37 3.0 SEISMIC WALKDOWN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH Entergy Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 has committed to conduct and document seismic walkdowns for resolution of NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic in accordance with the EPRI Seismic Walkdown Guidance [Ref. 2]. The approach provided in the Guidance for addressing the actions and information requested in Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f) Letter includes the following activities, the results of which are presented in the sections shown in parenthesis:

• Assignment of appropriately qualified personnel (Section 4.0)* Reporting of actions taken to reduce or eliminate the seismic vulnerabilities identified by the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) program (Section 5.0)* Selection of structures, systems and components (SSCs) to be evaluated (Section 6.0)* Performance of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys (Section 7.0)* Evaluation and treatment of potentially adverse seismic conditions with respect to the seismic licensing basis of the plant (Section 8.0)* Performance of peer reviews (Section 9.0)The coordination and conduct of these activities was initiated and tracked by Entergy corporate leadership, which provided guidance to each Entergy site throughout the seismic walkdown program, including Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2. Entergy contracted with an outside nuclear services company to provide engineering and project management resources to supplement and assist each individual site. Each site had dedicated engineering contractors, supported by their own project management and technical oversight, who worked closely with plant personnel.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 10 of 37 4.0 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS The NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program involved the participation of numerous personnel with various responsibilities.

This section identifies the project team members and their project responsibilities, and provides brief experience summaries for each. Training certificates of those qualified as Seismic Walkdown Engineers are included in Attachment I.Table 4-1 summarizes the names and responsibilities of personnel used seismic walkdowns.

Experience summaries of each person follow.to conduct the Table 4-1 Equipment Seismic Licensing IPEEE Name Selection Walkdown Basis Personnel Engineer Reviewer Richard Drake (ENTERGY)

X X Douglas Gaynor (ENTERGY)

X Richard Gioggia (ENTERGY)

X John Balletta (ENTERGY)

X1 Michael Koutsakos (ENTERGY)

X Michael Dries (ENTERGY)

X John Skonieczny (ENTERGY)

X X X Dragos Nuta (ENTERGY) x2 X X Kai Lo (ENTERGY)

X Maggie Staub (ENERCON)

X Nick Crispell (ENERCON)

X Paul Huebsch (ENERCON)

X Stephen Yuan (ENERCON)

X Kirit Parikh (ENERCON)

X R1 R1 Notes: 1.2.Plant operations representative Designated lead SWE Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 11 of 37 Richard Drake Mr. Richard Drake is the Civil/Structural Design Engineering Supervisor for Entergy Nuclear at the Indian Point Nuclear Plant. He has over 30 years of nuclear power generation experience, of which 18 years have been as an Indian Point Supervisor.

His broad experience includes design engineering activities associated with seismic qualification of components, piping and structures.

Mr. Drake is an EPRI trained Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Engineer as well as being trained in the EPRI NARE/STERI seismic qualification method. Mr. Drake is a registered Professional Engineer in both NY and NJ.Douglas Gavnor Mr. Douglas Gaynor is a Senior Lead Engineer for Entergy Nuclear at the Indian Point Energy Center, responsible for probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). He holds a Bachelor Degree and Master Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Manhattan College and has 38 years of experience in the nuclear industry, including over 25 years in the area of probabilistic safety assessment.

His nuclear experience also includes radiological and accident analysis, regulatory response and project coordination.

Richard Gioppia Mr. Gioggia is an Engineering III for the Entergy Nuclear at Indian Point Plant. He has a Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering from Manhattan College with 5 years of experience as a System Engineer at IPEC. He was also involved in the initial walkdowns for the Fukushima IER 11-1 responses for IPEC.John Balletta Mr. John Balletta is currently a Unit 2 Licensed SRO for Entergy Nuclear at Indian Point Energy Center. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Electrical Engineering from Manhattan College. He has 25 years of experience in the nuclear industry as an Instrument

& Controls (I&C) Technician, I&C Supervisor, Test Engineer, Control Room Supervisor, Field Support Supervisor, and Shift Technical Advisor. He has been in Operations for the past 17 years in various positions of responsibility.

Michael Koutsakos Mr. Michael Koutsakos is a Technical Specialist IV for the Main Steam Systems for Entergy Nuclear Northeast at Indian Points Energy Center. Mr. Koutsakos has an Associate of Applied Science Degree in Nuclear Technology, 27 years of nuclear experience at IPEC, 20 of which in the Operations Department including a Reactor Operators License. He has extensive knowledge of plant operations and procedures, accident and transient analysis and design bases functions of safety related SSC's.

Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 12 of 37 Michael Dries Mr. Michael Dries is a Senior Systems Engineer with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. and a staff Engineer at Indian Point Energy Center. He has over 38 years experience in the Nuclear Industry and has held this position in System Engineering for approximately 19 years. Roles and responsibilities include trending of system performance, maintenance effectiveness, evaluation of degraded operation, classification of system components and knowledge of component design and licensing basis. He has or has had responsibility for the Reactor Coolant System, Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System, Fuel Handling System, Instrument Air System and Station Air System. He holds a Master of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the New Jersey Institute of Technology.

John Skoniecznv Mr. Skonieczny is a Senior Civil/Structural Engineer and licensed Professional Engineer in the state of New York. He is SQUG qualified and has been at IPEC for over 10 years.Paul Huebsch Mr. Huebsch has worked as an ENERCON Civil/Structural Engineer for the past 9 years, and has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Walkdowns on 09/13/2012.

He has a bachelor's degree and a master's degree with majors in structural engineering.

Mr. Huebsch has 47 years of structural engineering experience in the commercial, industrial and nuclear fields. He is an active professional engineer in the state of New Jersey and was previously licensed in 12 other states.Nick Crispell Mr. Crispell has worked as an ENERCON Civil/Structural Engineer for the past 4 years, and has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Walkdowns on 09/13/2012.

He has a bachelor's degree and a master's degree with majors in structural engineering.

Mr. Crispell has 9 years of structural engineering experience in residential, commercial, and the nuclear fields. He is an active professional engineer in the state of Georgia.Stephen Yuan Mr. Stephen Yuan, P.E. is assigned to the ENERCON New Jersey office as a Senior Civil Engineer.

Mr. Yuan has over 20 years of experience in structural computer modeling, design, rehabilitations, upgrading, electrical facility structure analyses and maintenance of industrial installations and nuclear power plants, including significant experience at Perry, Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee Plant. Mr. Yuan was one of the key civil engineers in support of the transformer replacement project at Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Mr. Yuan holds a M.S. in Civil Engineering and PE in the states NY, NJ, PA, and NH.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 13 of 37 Kirit Parikh Mr. Parikh is a senior engineer assigned to the ENERCON New Jersey office as a Senior Civil Engineer.

Mr. Parikh has over 25 years of Civil/Mechanical design, field engineering, modifications, work package preparation and closure. He has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Walkdowns on 09/28/2012.

Draqos Nuta Mr. Dragos Nuta is a senior staff engineer for Entergy Nuclear at the Indian Point Energy Center and a Registered Professional Engineer.

He is a civil/structural engineer with over 30 years of experience in the nuclear industry.

He is a member of the ACI 349 Committee and a member of the ASCE Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Structures Committee.

Mr. Nuta is certified as a SQUG Seismic Capability Engineer and Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Engineer.Kai Lo Mr. Kwok Kai Lo is a senior engineer for Entergy Nuclear at Indian Point Nuclear Plant. Mr.Lo is a civil/structural engineer by degree with over 30 years of experience in the nuclear industry.

He has served roles in Maintenance Rule Structural Monitoring, plant modifications, FAC program wall thinning evaluations, piping and pipe support design engineering.

Mr. Lo is experienced in performing various types of structural analysis for license basis and operability.

Mr. Lo is an EPRI trained SQUG Seismic Capability Engineer since 1993.Maggie Staub (A.K.A. Maggie Farah) R1 Ms. Staub is a Civil/Structural Engineer in ENERCON's NJ office. She has over 5 years of experience performing structural analysis and design in nuclear industry.

Her experience includes developing and analyzing finite element models using a variety of software.

Ms.Staub is an EPRI trained Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Engineer and was a Seismic Walkdown Engineer for Plant Farley. Ms. Staub has a bachelor's degree in Civil Engineering and a Master's degree in Structural Engineering.

4.1 EQUIPMENT SELECTION PERSONNEL A total of 7 individuals served as Equipment Selection Personnel

-see Table 4-1.4.2SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEERS A total of 5 individuals served as Seismic Walkdown Engineers

-see Table 4-1.4.2.1 For the walkdown of the deferred SWEL items, there are 4 SWEs. R1 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 14 of 37 4.3LICENSING BASIS REVIEWERS A total of 2 individuals served as Licensing Basis Reviewers

-see Table 4-1.4.3.1 For the walkdown of the deferred SWEL items, there is 1 Licensing Basis Reviewer.R1 4.41PEEE REVIEWERS One individual served as IPEEE Reviewer -see Table 4-1.Table 4-2 summarizes the names and responsibilities of personnel used to conduct peer reviews of the seismic walkdown program. Experience summaries of each person follow.Table 4-2 SWEL Peer Walkdown Licensing Submittal Name Reviewer Peer Basis Peer Report Peer Reviewer Reviewer Reviewer Thomas Panayotidi (ENERCON)

X X1 X1 Kenneth Whitmore (ENERCON)

X1 Pouria Pourghobadi (ENERCON)

X Richard Drake (ENTERGY)

X Dragos Nuta (ENTERGY) x2 John Skonieczny (ENTERGY)

X R1 Notes: 1.2.Peer Review Team Leader Submittal report additional reviewer for Rev. 1 I RI Thomas Panayotidi Dr. Panayotidi has worked as an ENERCON Civil/Structural Consulting Engineer for the past year, and has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Seismic Walkdowns on 09/13/2012.

Dr. Panayotidi has a Doctorate of Engineering Science in Civil Engineering/Engineering Mechanics, with emphasis in finite element analysis, particularly for seismic and other dynamic loads. Dr. Panayotidi has over 30 years'experience as a Structural/Seismic Engineer in the nuclear field.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 15 of 37 Kenneth Whitmore Mr. Kenneth Whitmore is a senior structural engineer with ENERCON who has performed evaluations of structures at Perry, Oyster Creek, Humboldt Bay, Robinson, Millstone, Indian Point, Diablo Canyon, Grand Gulf, and St Lucie. Mr. Whitmore was the lead structural engineer for the Dry Fuel Storage designs at Grand Gulf and Robinson as well as performing analysis and design for dry fuel projects at Millstone, Diablo Canyon, Humboldt Bay and St.Lucie. Mr. Whitmore also performed structural analysis for security upgrade work at Robinson, Indian Point, Nine Mile Point and Fitzpatrick and structural assessments at Crystal River, Perry, St. Lucie and Davis Besse. Mr. Whitmore has been responsible for reviewing documents related to the seismic issues associated with several COL applications and for developing conceptual designs for balance of plant systems and components for proposed new nuclear plants, related to COL applications.

He is currently the lead structural engineer in the ENERCON Mt. Arlington, NJ office, responsible for continuing plant services and completed the Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Seismic Walkdowns on 06/21/2012.

Pouria Pourcqhobadi Mr. Pourghobadi is a civil/structural Engineer with ENERCON. Mr. Pourghobadi has successfully completed Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Seismic Walkdowns in 09/13/2012.

Mr. Pourghobadi has performed civil/structural engineering support to various nuclear facilities included steel and foundation analysis and design.Richard Drake (See Section 4.0)R1 Draqos Nuta (See Section 4.0)

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 16 of 37 5.01IPEEE VULNERABILITIES REPORTING During the IPEEE program in response to NRC Generic Letter 88-20 [Ref. 4], plant-specific seismic vulnerabilities were identified at many plants. In this context, "vulnerabilities" refers to conditions found during the IPEEE program related to seismic anomalies, outliers, or other findings.IPEEE Reviewers (see Section 4.4) reviewed the IPEEE final report [Ref. 5] and supporting documentation to identify items determined to present a seismic vulnerability by the IPEEE program. IPEEE Reviewers then reviewed additional plant documentation to identify the eventual resolutions to those seismic vulnerabilities not resolved via the completion of the IPEEE program.The seismic vulnerabilities identified for Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 during the IPEEE program are reported in Attachment A. As a result of the IPEEE analysis, the hold-down bolts on the CCW Surge Tank were replaced with high strength bolts.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 17 of 37 6.0SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LIST DEVELOPMENT This section summarizes the process used to select the SSCs that were included in the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) in accordance with Section 3 of the Guidance.

A team of equipment selection personnel with extensive knowledge of plant systems and components was selected to develop the SWEL. The SWEL is comprised of two groups of items: SWEL I consists of a sample of equipment required for safe shutdown of the reactor and to maintain containment integrity (i.e., supporting the five safety functions)

• SWEL 2 consists of items related to the spent fuel pool The final SWEL is the combination of SWELl and SWEL2. The development of these two groups is described in the following sections.6.1 SAMPLE OF REQUIRED ITEMS FOR THE FIVE SAFETY FUNCTIONS Safe shutdown of the reactor involves four safety functions:

• Reactor reactivity control (RRC)* Reactor coolant pressure control (RCPC)* Reactor coolant inventory control (RCIC)* Decay heat removal (DHR)Maintaining containment integrity is the fifth safety function:* Containment function (CF)The overall process for developing a sample of equipment to support these five safety functions is summarized in Figure 1-1 of the Guidance.

Figure 1-1 of the Guidance provides a screening method for selecting SSCs, starting with all of the plant SSCs and reducing the number based on a series of screening criteria.

The equipment coming out of Screen #3 and entering Screen #4 is defined as Base List 1. The equipment coming out of Screen #4 is the first Seismic Walkdown Equipment List, or SWEL 1. Development of these lists is described separately in the following sections.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 18 of 37 6.1.1 Base List 1 Based on Figure 1-1 and Section 3 of the Guidance, Base List 1 should represent a set of Seismic Category (SC) I equipment or systems that support the five safety functions.

Base List 1 was derived from both the IPEEE equipment list and the USI-A46 equipment list. The portion of the IP2 IPEEE addressing seismic events used a probabilistic risk analysis rather than a seismic margins approach to address beyond design basis events. Since the analysis provided an integrated assessment of the plant, it inherently addressed the five safety functions.

The objective of the USI-A46 program was to develop a list of equipment that will provide safe shutdown of the reactor and maintain a safe stable state in response to a design basis earthquake.

The USI-A46 equipment list was also used as a starting point for the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Base List 1. Base List 1 is presented as Table 1 in Attachment B, and has 986 total items.6.1.2 SWEL 1 Based on Figure 1-1 and Section 3 of the Guidance, SWEL 1 should represent a diverse population of items on Base List 1 including representative items from some of the variations within each of five sample selection attributes.

Additionally, the selection of SWEL 1 items includes consideration of the importance of the contribution to risk for the SSCs. Equipment Selection Personnel (see Section 4.1) developed SWEL 1 using an iterative process. The following paragraphs describe how the equipment selected for inclusion on the final SWEL 1 are representative with respect to each of the five sample selection attributes while also considering risk significance.

In general, preference for inclusion on SWEL 1 was given to items that are accessible and have visible anchorage while still maintaining the sample selection attributes.

SWEL 1 is presented as Table 2 in Attachment B, and has 101 total items.Variety of Types of Systems Items were selected from Base List 1 ensuring that each of the five safety functions was well represented.

Additionally, components from a variety of frontline and support systems, as listed in Appendix E of the Guidance, were selected.

The system type of each item on SWEL 1 is listed on Table 2 of Attachment B.Maior New and Replacement Equipment The Equipment Selection Personnel, and the Configuration Management Group, with assistance from plant operations, identified items on Base List 1 which are either major new or replacement equipment installed within the past 15 years, or have been Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 19 of 37 modified or upgraded recently.

These items are designated as such on Base List 1 on Table 1 of Attachment B. A robust sampling of these items is represented on SWEL 1.Variety of Equipment Types According to Appendix B of the Guidance, there are 22 classes of mechanical and electrical equipment.

The items on Base List 1 were classified accordingly and the total number from each class was determined.

Items were then selected from Base List 1 ensuring that each of the equipment classes represented there was also represented on SWEL 1 in approximately the same ratios. The equipment class of each item on SWEL 1 is listed on Table 1 of Attachment B. Note that SWEL 1 does not include Class 3, medium voltage, metal clad switchgear components, because this class of equipment does not exist on the Unit 2 site.Variety of Environments Items were selected from Base List 1 located in a variety of buildings, rooms, and elevations.

These item locations included environments that were both inside and outside, as well as having high temperature and/or elevated humidity and within containment.

Items that were part of borated systems were included as well. The location and environment of each item on SWEL 1 is listed on Table 1 of Attachment B.IPEEE Enhancements With assistance from IPEEE Reviewers, Equipment Selection Personnel identified items on Base List 1 which were enhanced as a result of seismic vulnerabilities identified during the IPEEE program (see Section 5.0). Such items are designated as such on Base List 1 on Table 1 of Attachment B and are represented on SWELl.Risk Significance Information from the plant Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) model and the Maintenance Rule implementation documentation were used to determine whether items were risk significant.

Where otherwise comparable items could be chosen relative to the sample selection attributes, the item with higher risk significance was chosen.6.2 SPENT FUEL POOL ITEMS The overall process for developing a sample of SSCs associated with the spent fuel pool (SFP) is similar to that of the screening process for SWEL 1 and is summarized in Figure 1-2 of the Guidance.

The equipment coming out of Screen #2 and entering Screen #3 is defined as Base List 2. The items coming out of Screen #4 are the items that could potentially cause the SFP to drain rapidly. The items coming out of either Screen #3 or Screen #4 are the Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 20 of 37 second Seismic Walkdown Equipment List, or SWEL 2. Development of these lists is described separately in the following sections.6.2.1 Base List 2 Based on Figure 1-2 and Section 3 of the Guidance, Base List 2 should represent the Seismic Category I equipment or systems associated with the SFP. To develop Base List 2, Equipment Selection Personnel (see Section 4.1) reviewed plant design and licensing basis documentation and plant drawings for the SFP and its associated cooling system Base List 2 is presented as Table 3 in Attachment B, and has 10 total items.6.2.2 Rapid Drain-Down Rapid drain-down is defined as unintentionally lowering the water level to the top of the fuel assemblies within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> after an earthquake.

Consistent with the Guidance, the Equipment Selection Personnel (see Section 4.1) identified SSCs that could cause the SFP to drain rapidly by first reviewing the SFP documentation to identify penetrations below about 10 ft above the top of the fuel assemblies.

This review assessed the hydraulic lines and connected equipment of each such penetration for potentially seismically-induced failure modes that could lead to rapid drain down. The list of SSCs that could cause rapid drain-down is presented as Table 4 in Attachment B which includes the specific basis for determining which SSCs could or could not cause rapid drain-down.

The rapid drain-down list has a total of 3 items.6.2.3 SWEL 2 Based on Figure 1-2 and Section 3 of the Guidance, SWEL 2 is a broad population of items on Base List 2 including representative items from some of the variations within each of four sample selection attributes (using sample process similar to SWEL 1), plus each item that could potentially cause rapid-drain down of the SFP. Due to the population of items on Base List 2 being much smaller than Base List 1, the sampling attributes are satisfied differently for SWEL 2 than for SWEL 1. The following paragraphs describe how the equipment selected from Base List 2 for inclusion on SWEL 2 are representative with respect to each of the four sample selection attributes.

SWEL 2 is presented as Table 5 in Attachment B, and has 7 total items; of these, 7 items are selected from Base List 2, and none are from the rapid drain-down list because these items fall into one of the following categories:

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 21 of 37* Routinely disassembled, inspected and reassembled every refueling outage and excluded per FAQ 3.17 of Reference 2* Routinely inspected every refueling outage and excluded per FAQ 3.16 of Reference 2 Not accessible (in Spent Fuel Pool) and additionally are in the category of piping, not equipment or component.

Variety of Types of Systems There are 4 systems associated with SFP cooling. The four systems are defined as cooling, purification, structure and overhead items which could potentially damage the pool components.

Each of these systems with the exception of structure is well-represented on the SWEL2 list. Structure has been eliminated from the SWEL2 list based on routine inspection, accessibility and category (i.e. item is piping, not equipment or component) as identified in Attachment B.Maior New and Replacement Equipment With the exception of the Ederer crane, there have been no major new or replacement equipment installations within the past 15 years associated with the SFP. Therefore, this sampling attribute is not applicable.

Variety of Equipment Types There are 3 different equipment classes represented on Base List 2: 0, 5 and 21.Each of these equipment classes is represented on SWEL 2.Variety of Environments All SFP components are nearby and are thus located in similar environments.

Therefore, this sampling attribute is not applicable.

6.31DEFERRED INACCESSIBLE ITEMS on SWEL Each item on the SWEL shall be walked down as part of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program, In order to perform the seismic walkdowns of these items, it is necessary to have access to them and to be able to view their anchorage.

In some cases, it was not feasible to gain access to the equipment or view its anchorage because Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 was at power during the entire 180-day response period of Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f)Letter. For these cases, walkdowns of these items have been deferred until the next refueling outage (RFO) in February/March of 2014. An updated submittal report incorporating these R1 deferred walkdowns will be provided in June of 2014. 1 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 22 of 37 Deferred items are summarized in the table below. The reason for deferral is identified as either ACC (indicating that the item is inaccessible while the plant is at power) or CAB (indicating that the item requires opening cabinet/panel doors which was not permitted by Plant Operations personnel during the walkdown period, due to being energized or otherwise).

A total of 31 items are deferred; of these, 12 are in inaccessible areas, and 20 are cabinets/panels required to be opened. Of the inaccessible and needs cabinets opened.above, one deferred item is both SWEL# Equipment ID Description Location Reason SWELl -006 MCC-26A 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-O" CAB SWELl-007 MCC-26AA 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-0" CAB SWELl -008 MCC-26B 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-0" CAB SWELl-009 MCC-26BB 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-0" CAB SWELl -010 MCC-27A 480 VAC MCC PA EL.98'-0" CAB SWELl-011 MCC-29 480 VAC MCC CB EL.33'-0" CAB SWELl-012 MCC-26C 480 VAC MCC CB EL.33'-0" CAB SWELl -015 52/RTA REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A CB EL.33'-0" CAB 118 VAC INSTRUMENT BUS CAB SWELl-063 IBUS21 GB EL.53'-0" 21 ACC SWELl-064 DPNL22 125 VDC DISTRIBUTION CB EL.53'-0" CAB PANEL 22 PC4 STATIC INVERTER #23 SWELl-067 EDC1 MANUAL B-A CB EL.33'-0" CAB MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH SWELl-072 M19 BATTERY CHARGER 21 CB EL.33'-0" CAB SWELl -073 EGA3 BATTERY CHARGER 24 CB EL.33'-0" CAB SWELl-074 EGA1 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER CB EL.33'-0" CAB#21 SWELl-075 EGA8 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER CB EL.33'-0 CAB#23 SWELl -076 0021 EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 EDG EL.72'-0" CAB Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 23 of 37 SWEL# Equipment ID Description Location Reason SWELl-077 0022EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 EDG EL.72'-0" CAB SWELl-078 0023EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 EDG EL.72'-0" CAB EDG BLDG 72' EL ENGINE SWELl-081 IP2-EDGB-72-DB6 AUXILARIEL PANE EDG EL.72'-0" CAB AUXILIARIES CTRL PANEL SWELl -087 PNL PP9 EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL EDG EL.72'-O" CAB SWELl-082 INST RK 19 INSTRUMENT RACK 19 VC EL.68'-0" ACC SWELl-083 INST RK 21 INSTRUMENT RACK 21 VC EL.68'-0" ACC SWELl -086 TE-122 EXCESS LETDOWN TEMP VCI EL.46'-0" ACC ELEMENT SWELl-101 21AT 21 SIS ACCUMULATOR VC EL.46'-0" ACC SWELl-003 22AT 22 SIS ACCUMULATOR VC EL.46'-0" ACC SWELl-033 22RP 22 RECIRC PUMP VC EL.46'-0" ACC SWEL1-052 0021CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN VC EL.68'-0" ACC 21 CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN SWELl-053 0022CRF 22 VC EL.68'-0" ACC 22 SWELl-054 0023CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN VC EL.68'-0" ACC 23 CONTAINMENT REClRC FAN SWELl-055 0024CRF 24 VC EL.68'-0" ACC 24 SWELl-056 0025CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN VC EL.68'-0" ACC 25 6.3.1 Five of the thirty-one SWEL deferred items were walked down pre-outage, before February 2014. The reasons are: (1) The item will still be energized during outage and it is less plant risk to open the item for inspection during the pre-outage time. (2) The item is out of service for PM or surveillance testing. (3) The item was removed from the "protected" equipment list in June and November time frame, and can be opened by an operator.

These five items are: SWEL1-076, SWELI-077, SWELl -078, SWELl-081 and SWELl-087.

The rest of the items (twenty-six SWELs) were walked during the refueling outage in February/March, 2014.R1 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 24 of 37 7.0 SEISMIC WALKDOWNS AND AREA WALK-BYS The NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program, conducted in accordance with the Guidance, involves two primary walkdown activities:

Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys.

These activities were conducted at Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 by teams of a minimum of two trained and qualified Seismic Walkdown Engineers (SWEs) (see Section 4.2). Each team included one engineer with at least several years of experience in seismic design and qualification of nuclear power plant SSCs. A total of five individuals forming SWE teams of two or three individuals were used. One of the individuals was a member of the site Engineering group. The teams periodically "shuffled" personnel to cross-check consistency between the SWEs and to ensure that lessons learned were being shared. SWE teams were occasionally accompanied into the field by Plant Operations personnel and/or electricians to IR1 open cabinets.The seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys were conducted over the course of 3.5 weeks during October of 2012 and the deferred items were conducted over the course 10 days in IR1 February/March of 2014. Each morning, a pre-job brief with all personnel involved was conducted.

This pre-job brief was used to outline the components and areas that would be walked down that day, to ensure consistency between the teams, to reinforce expectations, to identifying potential personnel safety issues specific to that day, and to allow team members to ask questions and share lessons learned in the field. The SWE teams brought cameras, tape measures, flashlights, mirrors and calipers into the field to assist with the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys.7.1 SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Seismic walkdowns were performed in accordance with Section 4 of the Guidance for all items on the SWEL (SWEL 1 plus SWEL 2), except for those determined to be inaccessible and deferred (see Section 6.3). To document the results of the walkdown, Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) with the same content as that included in Appendix C of the Guidance was created for each item. Additionally, where permitted by Plant Operations and plant procedures, photographs were taken of each item and included on the corresponding SWC.Prior to performance of the walkdowns, documentation packages were developed that contained the pre-filled SWC and other pertinent information including the location drawings, response spectra information, previous IPEEE seismic walkdown documentation, current operability evaluations affecting SWEL items, SQUG packages where available and anchorage drawings where applicable.

These documentation packages were brought with the SWE teams into the plant during the seismic walkdowns.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 25 of 37 Walkdown inspections focused on anchorages and seismic spatial interactions, but also included inspections for other potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Anchorage, in all cases, was considered to specifically mean anchorage of the component to the structure.

This included anchor bolts to concrete walls or floors, structural bolts to structural steel and welds to structural steel or embedded plates. For welds, the walkdown team looked for cracks and corrosion in the weld and base metal. Other bolts or connections, such as flange bolts on in-line components were not considered as equipment anchorage.

The bolts and connections were evaluated by the SWEs and any potential adverse seismic concerns were documented under "other adverse seismic conditions" rather than under "anchorage".

Thus, components with no attachments to the structure are considered as not having anchorage.

Nevertheless, the attachment of these components to other equipment was evaluated and inspected for potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Cabinets/panels on the SWEL that could be reasonably opened without presenting safety or operational hazards were opened during the walkdown.

This allowed visual observation of internal anchorage to the structure (where present), as well as inspection for "other adverse seismic conditions" related to internal components (if it could be observed without breaking the plane of the equipment opening).

Where opening the cabinet/panel exhibited undue safety or operational hazards, it was considered inaccessible and the completion of the walkdown of that item was deferred to a later time (see Section 6.3). Where opening the cabinet/panel required extensive disassembly (e.g., doors or panels were secured by more than latches, thumbscrews, or similar), justification for how the inspection met the program goal without opening the cabinet/panel was included on the SWC and the walkdown of that item is considered complete.In addition to the general inspection requirements, at least 50% of the SWEL items having anchorage required confirmation that the anchorage configuration was consistent with plant documentation.

Of the 108 SWEL items (SWELl plus SWEL2), 100 were considered to have anchorage (i.e., removing in-line/line-mounted components).

Of these 100 anchored components, the walkdowns of 56 included anchorage configuration verification, which is greater than 50%. When anchorage configuration verification was conducted, the specific plant documentation used for comparison to the as-found conditions was referenced on the SWC.The SWC for each SWEL item where a seismic walkdown has been initiated is included in Attachment C. The SWEL items that have "ACC" designations in Section 6.3 are not contained in Attachment C in this revision of the report. For the combined SWELl and SWEL2 list, a total of 95 SWCs are attached, 77 with completion status marked "Y" and 31 R1 with completion status marked "U" (13 inside containment and 18 with CAB status). The designation "Y" indicates that the walkdown is complete and all required information has been Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 26 of 37 collected.

There is no need to revisit the item. The designation "U" indicates that the SWEL walkdown is incomplete and the item must be revisited to obtain additional information.

Thirteen SWCs are fully deferred.

SWCs considered and marked incomplete are those where a walkdown was initiated, but whose completion was ultimately deferred because the cabinet/panel could not be opened during the walkdown period. Therefore, the 77 completed I R1 SWCs represent the completed walkdowns of each SWEL item accessible during the walkdown period.7.1.1 The SWCs for the thirty-one deferred SWEL items walked down during pre-outage and during the February/March 2014 outage are included in Attachment J. The thirty-one items now have a "Y" status after the 2014 walkdowns.

Including the 77 SWCs walked R1 down (with a "Y" status) in October of 2012, a total of 108 SWEL items were completed with "Y" status.7.2AREA WALK-BYS Seismic area walk-bys were performed in accordance with Section 4 of the Guidance for all plant areas containing items on the SWEL (SWEL 1 plus SWEL 2), except for those SWEL items located in plant areas inaccessible during the walkdown period (see Section 6.3). Area walk-bys were not deferred where components were deferred simply to open cabinets/panels.

A separate Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) with the same content as that included in Appendix C of the Guidance was used to document the results of each area walk-by performed.

Where permitted by Plant Operations, photographs were taken of each area, and included on the corresponding SWC.Area walk-bys were conducted once for plant areas containing more than one SWEL item. In cases where the room or area containing a component was very large, the extent of the area encompassed by the area walk-by was limited to a radius of approximately 35 ft around the subject equipment.

The extent of the areas included in the area walk-bys is described on the AWC for that area. Because certain areas contained more than one SWEL item, there are fewer total area walk-bys conducted than seismic walkdowns.

A total of 36 area walk-bys was necessary to cover all plant areas containing at least one accessible SWEL item.The AWC for each area walk-by completed is included in Attachment D. A total of 36 AWCs are attached, which represent all of the areas containing SWEL items that were accessible during the walkdown period. An estimated additional 11 area walk-bys of areas inside containment and in the Control Room will be completed together with the deferred walkdowns for those inaccessible items (see Section 6.3).

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 27 of 37 There were 12 additional AWCs created for the remaining 31 deferred, inaccessible SWEL items. These new AWCs are included in Attachment K. The total of all the AWC for all 108 Ri SWEL items is 48.8.0 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATIONS During the course of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys, the objective of the SWE teams was to identify existing degraded, non-conforming, or unanalyzed plant conditions with respect to its current seismic licensing basis. This section summarizes the process used to handle conditions identified, what conditions were found, and how they were treated for eventual resolution.

8.1 CONDITION IDENTIFICATION When an unusual condition was observed by a SWE team in the field, the condition was noted on the SWC or AWC form and briefly discussed between the two SWEs to agree upon whether it was a potentially adverse seismic condition.

These initial conclusions were based on conservative engineering judgment and the training required for SWE qualification.

For conditions that were reasonably judged as insignificant to seismic response, the disposition was included on the SWC or AWC checklist and the appropriate question was marked "Y", indicating that no associated potentially adverse seismic condition was observed.Unusual or uncertain conditions were reported to site personnel for further resolution through the Corrective Action Program (CAP) (see Section 8.2). A total of 88 seismically insignificant conditions were identified.

These conditions were generally related to housekeeping.

For conditions that were judged as potentially significant to seismic response, the condition was photographed, and the appropriate question on the SWC or AWC was marked "N" indicating that a potentially adverse seismic condition was observed.

The condition was then immediately reported to site personnel for further resolution and was documented for reporting in Attachment E. The original walkdown resulted in a total of 51 potentially adverse R1 seismic conditions that were identified.

These conditions were generally related to housekeeping (22), non-conforming anchorage (7), spatial interaction (22), or inadequate line flexibility (0).8.1.1 For the 31 deferred SWELl items SWC and 12 AWCs, a total of 20 Condition Reports (CRs) were written to identify 22 potentially adverse seismic conditions and other deficiencies as documented in Attachment L. These conditions were related to R1 housekeeping (19), non-conforming anchors (3), spatial interaction (0) or inadequate line flexibility (0).

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 28 of 37 8.2CONDITION RESOLUTION Conditions observed during the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys determined to be potentially adverse seismic conditions and other deficiencies are summarized in Attachments R1 E and L, including how each condition has been addressed and its current status. Each potentially adverse seismic condition is addressed either with a Licensing Basis Evaluation (LBE) to determine whether it requires entry into the CAP, or by entering it into the CAP directly.

The decision to conduct a LBE or enter the condition directly into the CAP was made on a case-by-case basis, based on the perceived efficiency of each process for eventual resolution of each specific condition.

Unusual conditions that were not seismically significant were entered into the CAP directly.Further resolution of these conditions is not tracked or reported as part of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program, except by noting the CR numbers generated on the applicable SWCs and AWCs.8.3LICENSING BASIS EVALUATIONS Potentially adverse seismic conditions identified as part of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program may be evaluated by comparison to the current licensing basis of the plant as it relates to the seismic adequacy of the equipment in question, as is described in Section 5 of the Guidance.

If the identified condition is consistent with existing seismic documentation associated with that item, then no further action is required.

If the identified condition cannot easily be shown to be consistent with existing seismic documentation, or no seismic documentation exists, then the condition is entered into the CAP.For the 51 identified potentially adverse seismic conditions and observed deficiencies during R1 the original walkdowns, 14 LBEs were performed.

Each LBE performed is documented consistently, and included in Attachment F. The results of these LBEs with respect to the associated potentially adverse seismic conditions are summarized in Attachment E. A total of 18 potentially adverse seismic conditions evaluated using a LBE were dispositioned and required no further action due to seismic concerns.8.3.1 During the walkdowns for the deferred items, 3 LBEs were performed.

Each LBE performed is documented and included in Attachment M. The associated potentially adverse seismic conditions are summarized in Attachment L. R1 8.4CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM ENTRIES Conditions identified during the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys that required further resolution were entered into the plant's CAP. These were reviewed in accordance with the Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 29 of 37 plant's existing processes and procedures for an eventual disposition.

Conditions entered into the CAP included three types of unusual conditions identified: " Seismically insignificant unusual conditions" Potentially adverse seismic condition that does not pass a LBE" Potentially adverse seismic condition that bypasses a LBE A total of 57 Condition Reports (CRs) were generated from the CAP as a result of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program. Of these, 2 CRs were generated to hold License Basis Evaluations.

Several of the CRs addressed similar conditions at a variety of locations or addressed multiple conditions at a single location.

For this reason, some CRs addressed both insignificant seismic issues and potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Of the 57 CRs noted above, the majority (38) was exclusively for seismically insignificant unusual conditions, 6 contained both seismically insignificant and potentially adverse seismic conditions and 13 CRs were related exclusively to potentially adverse seismic conditions

.The CR numbers, current status, and resolution (where applicable and available) are summarized for these potentially adverse seismic conditions in Attachment E.8.4.1 A total of 20 CRs were generated and entered into the CAP as a result of the walkdowns performed during the pre-outage and in February/March of 2014. Of these, 3 of the CRs generated required License Basis Evaluations.

Furthermore, it should be noted that "System Health" walkdowns were also being performed and deficiencies on some of the SWEL items were identified.

The condition reports summarized in Attachment L also include the CRs written as a result of concurrent inspection by other teams.Of the 20 CRs noted above, 17 were exclusively for seismically insignificant unusual conditions, and 3 CRs were related to potentially adverse seismic conditions.

The CR numbers, current status, and resolution (where applicable and available) are summarized for these potentially adverse seismic conditions and other deficiencies in R1 Attachment L.During the 2012 walkdowns, the unrestrained fluorescent light tubes were identified as potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Upon numerous discussions with plant personnel within the industry and Entergy fleet, it was decided that the unrestrained tubes were not potentially adverse seismic conditions.

This is because the fluorescent light tube is soft, brittle with a small mass compared to various targets. The impact created by the low kinetic energy of the tube will be insignificant and will create no Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 30 of 37 significant effect to a target. This is consistent with the EPRI benchmarking R1 documents.

8.5 PLANT CHANGES The CAP entries (CRs) generated by the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program are being resolved in accordance with the plant CAP process, including operability evaluations, extent of condition evaluations, and root cause analysis (where applicable).

Initial evaluations indicate that no immediate plant changes are necessary.

Final and complete resolutions of the CRs for seismically insignificant unusual conditions and potentially adverse seismic conditions will determine if future modifications to the plant are required.

While no immediate plant modifications have been identified as a result of the seismic walkdowns and walk-bys, various cases were found where repairs are required or housekeeping issues are being addressed.

Current status and resolutions (where applicable and available) for CRs related to potentially adverse seismic conditions are provided in Attachment E.8.5.1 While no immediate plant modifications have been identified to be required as a result of the deferred seismic walkdowns and walk-bys, one case (CR-IP2-2014-01250) was found that required repairs. Another deficiency identified is documented in CR-IP2- R1 2014-01662 may require repair/replacement during a future outage. Others CRs involving housekeeping issues have been addressed.

Current status and resolutions (where applicable and available) for CRs related to potentially adverse seismic conditions are provided in Attachment L.9.0 PEER REVIEW 9.1 PEER REVIEW PROCESS The peer review for the NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns was performed in accordance with Section 6 of the Guidance.

The peer review included an evaluation of the following activities:

review of the selection of the structures, systems, and components, (SSCs) that are included in the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL);review of a sample of the checklists prepared for the Seismic Walkdowns and area walk-bys;review of licensing basis evaluations and decisions for entering the potentially adverse conditions in to the plant's Corrective Action Plan (CAP); and* review of the final submittal report.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 31 of 37 At least two members of the peer review team (see Table 4.2) were involved in the peer review of each activity, the team member with the most relevant knowledge and experience taking the lead for that particular activity.

A designated overall Peer Review Team Leader provided oversight related to the process and technical aspects of the peer review, paying special attention to the interface between peer review activities involving different members of the peer review team.This section summarizes the process and results of each peer review activity.9.2 PEER REVIEW OF SEISMIC WALKDOWNS AND WALK-BYS The following sections summarize the process and results of each peer review activity.9.2.1 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List Development The peer review of SWEL follows Section 3 of the EPRI guidance.Since periodic inspections of Seismic Class I (SC-I) structures are routinely performed to monitor and control their structural degradation, SC-I structures were excluded from the equipment list. For similar reasons, SC-I piping and containment penetrations were also excluded.Review of the SWEL confirms that various classes of equipment, as identified under the IPEEE Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL) were considered.

The classes, ranging from 0 to 21, are summarized in Appendix B of the EPRI guidance.

Base List 1 included 986 components.

From these, 101 components, representing a variety of process systems such as Chemical and Volume Control, High/Low Pressure Recirculation/Injection, Auxiliary Feedwater, Emergency Boration, Residual Heat Removal, and others, were selected.

Each component was screened in accordance with the EPRI guidance (screens 1 thru 4) to ensure that it satisfied at least one of the five safety functions:

1) Reactor Reactivity Control 2) Reactor Coolant Pressure Control 3) Reactor Coolant Inventory Control 4) Decay Heat Removal 5) Containment Integrity In addition, a variety of environmental conditions (high/low temperature, humidity;indoor versus outdoor, boration system), whether the item was a major new or replacement equipment since IPEEE implementation, whether the item was previously identified as a IPEEE vulnerability, and whether the item's failure would constitute a

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 32 of 37 severe and immediate threat to safe operation of the plant (high risk), were considered during the final selection for SWEL-1.There were ten Spent Fuel Pool related components, as shown in Attachment B, Table 3, and three Rapid-Draw-Down related components, as shown in Attachment B, Table 4, selected for Base 2 List. The Rapid-Draw-Down components were excluded from further consideration because the Fuel Transfer Tube Blind Flange (IP2) and Fuel Transfer Canal Weir Gate (IP2) are routinely inspected, and the abandoned 4" Pipe Penetration (IP2), although inaccessible within the Spent Fuel Pool, is not a"component" or "equipment", but is part of the "structure".

A variety of environments and equipment classes were then considered, and the final SWEL-2, consisting of seven items, was formed.The comments made by the reviewers of the SWEL were mostly editorial; others were made to request clarification

("Are the 50% anchorage verification items indicated on the SWEL?" The answer was "Yes"). One reviewer asked why there were no IPEEE vulnerabilities reflected on the SWEL. The answer was that there were no "findings" after the IPEEE implementation for Unit 2. However, hold-down bolts on the CCW Surge Tank were upgraded to high strength bolts to increase seismic resistance.

In essence, this Peer Review of the SWEL confirms that preparation of the SWEL was conducted with extreme care, paying particular attention to the sampling process, to assure that a variety of systems, components, environments and risk insights associated with safe operation of the plant, have been implemented.

The peer review checklist of the SWEL is provided in Attachment G.9.2.2 Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys Peer review of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys was conducted by two peer reviewers, each of whom is a qualified SWE and has broad knowledge of seismic engineering applied to nuclear power plants. One of the peer reviewers participated in the seismic walkdown program for a different utility, and the other is engaged with the industry team which developed the Guidance (see Section 4.2). The peer reviews were conducted at the Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 2 concurrent with the conduct of walkdowns, at approximately 50% completion.

The peer review was performed as follows: The peer review team reviewed the walkdown packages (including checklists, photos, drawings, etc.) for SWEL items already completed to ensure that the checklists were completed in accordance with the Guidance.

A total of 23 SWC and 5 AWC forms were reviewed, each representing approximately 23% of their respective totals. In the context of the Guidance, the peer review team considered Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 33 of 37 the number of walkdown packages reviewed to be appropriate.

The packages reviewed represent a variety of equipment types in various plant areas. Specific SWC forms reviewed are SWEL1-013, SWEL 1-014, SWEL 1-015, SWEL 1-016 SWEL 1-017, SWEL 1-018, SWEL 1-019, SWEL 1-024, SWEL 1-032, SWEL 1-035, SWEL 1-036, SWEL 1-047, SWEL 1-051, SWEL 1-059, SWEL 1-060, SWEL 1-061, SWEL 1-065, SWEL 1-066, SWEL 1-068, SWEL 1-084, SWEL 1-089, SWEL 1-099, and SWEL 1-100. Specific AWC forms reviewed are AWC-02, AWC-04, AWC-06, AWC-04, and AWC-07. While reviewing the walkdown packages, the peer reviewers conducted informal interviews of the SWEs and asked clarifying questions to verify that they were conducting walkdowns and area walk-bys in accordance with the Guidance.* The peer review team held a meeting with the SWE teams to provide feedback on the walkdown and walk-by packages reviewed and the informal interviews, and discuss potential modifications to the documentation packages in the context of the Guidance.* Each peer reviewer accompanied each SWE team into the field and observed them perform a walkdown of a SWEL component and its associated area walk-by.During these observations, the peer reviewers asked clarifying questions to verify the walkdown and walk-by process being followed was in accordance with the Guidance.

The item walked down under the observation of a peer reviewer is SWELl-32.

The associated area walk-by performed under the observation of a peer reviewer is AWC-12," The peer review team held a meeting with the SWE teams to provide feedback on the walkdown and walk-by observations, and discuss how lessons learned from review of the walkdown packages had been incorporated into the walkdown process.As a result of the peer review activities, the SWE teams modified their documentation process to include additional clarifying details, particularly related to checklist questions marked "N/A" and where conditions were observed but judged as insignificant.

The peer review team felt these modifications would be of benefit for future reviews of checklists incorporated into the final report. These modifications were recommended following review of the walkdown and area walk-by packages, and the observation walkdowns and area walk-bys demonstrated that the SWEs understood the recommendations and were incorporating them into the walkdown and area walk-by process. Previously completed checklists were revised to reflect lessons learned from the peer review process.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 34 of 37 Based on completion of the walkdown and walk-by peer review activities described, the peer review team concludes that the SWE teams are familiar with and followed the process for conducting seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys in accordance with the Guidance.

The SWE teams adequately demonstrated their ability to identify potentially adverse seismic conditions such as adverse anchorage, adverse spatial interaction, and other adverse conditions related to anchorage, and perform anchorage configuration verifications, where applicable.

The SWEs also demonstrated the ability to identify seismically-induced flooding interactions and seismically-induced fire interactions such as the examples described in Section 4 of the Guidance.

The SWEs demonstrated appropriate use of self checks and peer checks. They discussed their observations with a questioning attitude, and documented the results of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys on appropriate checklists.

9.2.3 Licensing Basis Evaluations A peer review was completed of the licensing basis evaluations provided in Attachment F and the corresponding summary sheet provided in Attachment E. The majority of the licensing basis evaluations provided immediate resolution to operability concerns of the potentially adverse conditions identified by the walkdown personnel.

Within these licensing basis evaluations, CRs were generated for maintenance issues to replace missing bolts, nuts or remove items for housekeeping issues, or to provide further, detailed resolution of the potentially adverse seismic condition.

The remaining licensing basis evaluations were created to document potentially adverse seismic conditions that were immediately entered into the CAP for detailed evaluation and investigation.

The peer review of these LBEs ensured that all the information provided from the walkdown team to the licensing basis evaluation team member provided enough detail for accurate and timely resolution.

9.2.3.1 For the deferred SWEL items walked down in the pre-outage and during the outage time frame, a peer review was completed for the LBEs provided in R1 Attachment M and the associated CRs are provided in Attachment L. A total of three LBEs were generated and were all peer reviewed.9.2.4 Submittal Report The peer reviewer was provided with an early draft of this submittal report for peer review. The peer reviewer verified that the submittal report met the objectives and requirements of Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f) Letter, and documented the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program performed in accordance with the Guidance.

The peer reviewer provided the results of review activities to the SWE team for consideration.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 35 of 37 The SWE team satisfactorily addressed all peer review comments in the final version of the submittal report. The signature of the Peer Review Team Leader provides documentation that all elements of the peer review as described in Section 6 of the Guidance were completed.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 36 of 37

10.0 REFERENCES

1. 10CFR50.54(f)

Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012 2. EPRI 1025286, Seismic Walkdown Guidance for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, June 2012 3. Indian Point 2 UFSAR Revision 22 4. Generic Letter No. 88-20, Supplement 4, Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities

5. Individual Plant Examination of External Events for Indian Point Unit No. 2 Nuclear Generating Station, December 1995 6. Generic Letter No. 87-03, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 7. Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) Procedure:

Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment, Revision 3A, December 2001 8. EPRI-NP-5228-SL, Revision 1, Seismic Verification of Equipment Anchorage 9. NUREG-1407, Procedural and Submittal Guidance of the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities

10. EN-DC-168, Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walk-down Procedure 11. EPRI 1018352, Benchmarking for Seismic Housekeeping at Nuclear Power Plant, Compilation of Industry Practices, 1018352, December 2008 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 1 Page 37 of 37 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A -IPEEE VULNERABILITIES TABLE ATTACHMENT B -SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LISTS ATTACHMENT C -SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCs)ATTACHMENT D -AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs)ATTACHMENT E -POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS ATTACHMENT F -LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS ATTACHMENT G -PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL ATTACHMENT H -REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESOLUTIONS FORM ATTACHMENT I -SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES ATTACHMENT J -DEFERRED SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCs)ATTACHMENT K -DEFERRED AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs)RI ATTACHMENT L -DEFERRED WALKDOWNS POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITION ATTACHMENT M -DEFERRED WALKDOWNS LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037 Rev. 0 Page A-2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 9.3 IPESE VULNERABIUTIES TABLE FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 2C -.-....A. T. .. j ..OM. IT... T ..V-01 A sensitivity study was performed to examine the potential core damage frequency reduction if several bolts on the CCW surge tank supports were replaced with high strength bolts. Such a modification would strengthen the surge tank such that it would be screened out of the analysis based on high seismic capacity (greater than 1.5g median acceleration and OSg HCLPF).During the course of the seismic IPEEE effort, it was determined that, although the Component Cooling Water Surge Tank met its design basis, the capacity of the tank to withstand beyond design basis seismic events was limited by the capacity of the hold down bolts. As a result of this IPEEE finding, those hold down bolts were to be replaced by higher tensile strength bolts.The hold-down bolts of the CCW Surge Tank were replaced with high strength bolts.-4 4 I.4 4 I--I I F-I 4 I .1 .1-4 .1 Prepared by: Dragos Nuta AoJ 7 klCt" " D 18 Date: 11108/2012 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-1 of 42 ATTACHMENT B -SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LISTS Table I Base List I v>n w1/4K SRFEEN SCREEN 2 SCREENS 3 SCeBEI Nd, -F-eayue -~CURRENT<

SýSSEL EQUIPO CAS JEOUIPNEN[T EQUAIPMENT u EQUIPMENTODESCRIPTION UnegoMw ~ a En Evlrommeet We,at o t I ...... ......... .1- Pros -" 2 55 -Deneno InpuJt Form 21CH-PD U02tCHPD CH-ARDING PUMP NO. 21 PULSATION DAMPENER YES NO YES NO I B 0 NO, 21 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC YS N E E 2 5 -Denenoc Input Form 21EWPS S02ISWPS STRAINER YS N E E 2 50 -enenoc Input Form 22CAPD ES22CHPD CHARGING PUMP NO. 22 PULSATION DAMPENER YES NO YES NO I 5 x 2 5 GeeaIptFr 22PE EnWS NO. 22 SERVICE WAT ER PUMP AUTOMATIC YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 CO- GeedcInpu Fom 22WPS O022WPS STRAINER 2 SEOcr enori Input Form 23CHPD 0O23CHPO CHARGING PUMP NO 23 PULSATION DAMPENER YES NO YES NO I 0 NO, 23 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC 2 O -Genenoc Input Form 22EWPS O0225WP5 STRAIeNER ES NO YES YES O H 2 55 -Onerin Iput Form 245WP5 5245WP5 NO, 24 SERVICE WAT ER PUMP AUTOMATIC YS N E E_____ -eei nu om 2SP O5W STRAINER YS N E E 2 55- Geerlo Inut Form 2SSWPS U2SSWPS NO. 25 SERVICE WAT ER PUMP AUTOMATIC YS N E E 2 CO -Genetio Input Form 2REWPS OA26SWPS NOTR26NERVC WAE UPATMTCYES NO YES YES 0 H 2 CO -Genedc loper Form BAS ERC ACO BLNDR BORIC ACID BLENDER YES NO YES NO I S 2 0t -Moron Control Ceotens MCC24 MCC-24 480 VAC MCC YES NO TEA NO I 0 0 5 0 2 0t -Moron Control Centnrs MCC24A MCC-24A ASS VAC MCC TEE NO YES NO I 0 0 X 0 2 0t -Moron Control Centers MCC2AA MCC-26A 480 VAC MCC YES NO TEA TEE I 0 0 x 0 2 St -Moron Control C enters MCC2RAA MCC-26AA 45O VAC MCC YES NO YES YES I 0 X 0 0 2 0t -Motor Control Centers MCC2RB MCC-26B 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I 0 0 0 0 2 St -Motor Conttol Centers MCC2RBA MCC-26SB 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I 0 e 0 0 2 At -Molor Control Centers MCC2SC MCC-2BC 480 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I 0 e 0 0 2 51 -Motor Control Centers MCC2T MCC-27 460 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I 0 0 0 2 01 -Moron Control Centers MCC27A MCC-27A 450 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I 0 e

• e 2 01 -Motor Control Centers MCC28 MCC-25 HAD SAC MCC YES NO YES NO I 0 e 0 0 2 01 -Motor Control Centers MCC28A MCC-25A 455 VAC MCC YES NO YEA NO I

• e e e 2 St -Motor Corntro Centers MCC29 MCC-29 450 VAC MCC YES NO YES NO I x 5 0 5 2 St -Motor Corstro Centers MCC29A MCC-29A 480 VAC MCC YES NO TES NO I a e 0 x 2 02 -Low Votage Seitohgeor AL8 REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A 65B SWITCHGEAR YES NO YEA NO I*2 02 -Low Vohage Swirchgeor ALA REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A &66 SWTTCHGEAIR YES NO YES NO I a 2 02 -Low Voltage Soitohgeer AL9 REACTOR TRIP BY-PASS EWITCHGEAR A &6B YES NO YEA NO I a 2 02 -Low Vo~ege Ewitohgean AL9 REACTOR TRIP BY-PASS SWITCHGEAR A & B YES NO YES NO I ______2 02 -Low PoTtage Switchneaw SUE 2A SUE 2A 455 SAC EWIYCHGEAR 22 SUE 2A YES NO YES NO I 0 a a 0 2 02 -LOW Voltage Ewirolhgean ASS 3A BUS 3A 480 SAC SWITCHGEAR BEE 3A YES NO YES NO I a e 0 e 2 02 -Low Vohage Seirohgean BUS 5A BUS 5A 480 SAC SWITCHGEAR 21 BUS tA *YES NO YES NO I e C 0 x0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-2 of 42 I SRE SCREEN 2, SCREEN 2- , CREEN4 F---MN'T SEL EQUIP CLASS EQUIPMENT EQUIPU ENT EQUIPMEINT DESCRIPTIO D.e.ySensa

~V*1- ordto "S" er .. Re.ereneFt 7p 2 52- Loon Vo~age Sorluhgear BUS BA BUS 6A 480 VAC SWITCHGEAR 22 BUS BA YES NO YES NO I 0 X 1 2 54 -Transformrers BB7 BB7 PRESSURIZES HEAT ER BACKUP GROUP #23 5 N E E______TRANSFORMER YS N E E 2 54 Transformers BBS BSB PRESSURIZER I-EATER TRANSFORMER YES NO YES YES x 2 04 -Transformers 5B9 ASS PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 YE NO YES YES I*TRANSFORMER 2 54 -Transformers BC2 BC2 4800120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 YES NO YES NO I X 0 B 0 2 54 -Transformers EBA1 EBA1 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER 023 YES NO YES NO I X x 0 K 2 54 -Transformers EMSf EBAS 4801120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. f24 YES NO YES NO I 0

• 0 C 2 54 -Transfoormers EBSI2 IEBBI2 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER 021 YES NO YES NO I

• xx 2 54 -Transformers NONE EBS2 4SUV208-12SV TRANSFOR MER#2 YES NO YES YES I X X xx 2 54 -Transformers sTST STATION SERTICE TRANSFORMER 5A YES NO YES YES I X B 0 2 55 -Horizontal Pumps 21 SIP-PMP 0021 SIP SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 YES NO YES YES I 5 2 55 -Horizontal Pumps 22AFP-PMP SS22AF P AUX PEED PU MP NO. 22 YES NO YES NO I 0 2 55 --lorzortal Pumps 22CCP-PMP SS22CCP CCW PUMP NO. 22 YES NO YES YES I 2 55 -Horizontal Pumps 22CHP-PMP 0022CHP 80. 22 CHARGING PUMP YES NO YES NO I S e 2 55 -Horizonta/

Pomps 2ICSP 21COP CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 2f YES NO YES NO I B 0 1 2 05 -Hoozonral Pomps 22C5P 22C5P CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 22 YES NO YES NO I B 0 0 2 05 -Honzontal Pomps 22CRPFCA 002"2CHPFCA CHARGING PUMP NO 22 FLUID DRIVE COOLER A YES NO YES NO I e 2 ~~~~CHARD/NO PUMP NO,.22 CRANKCASE OILYE NOES OI S -Rorizontal Pumps 22CPFCB 0022CHPFCB COOLER 2 US -Honzontal Pumps 22LACCLWP 0022CLWP 22 SRA CMPR CL COOLING WATER PMP YES NO YES YES / X 0 *2 US -Hoozonfal PumpN 22PW MP U022PWMP PRIM WATER AREA-UP PUMP 22 YES NO YES NO I x 2 55 -Honizontal Pumps 22SlP-PMP UU22SIP SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 22 YES NO YES YES I B x 2 55 -Horizantal Pumps 23AFP-PMP UU23AFP AUS PEED PUMP NO. 23 YES NO YES NO I 2 55 -Horizontal Pumps 23CCP-PMP 0023CCP CCW PUMP NO. 23 YES NO YES YES I 2 05 -Horizontal Pumps 23CHP-PMP US23CHP NO 23 CHARGING PUMP YES NO YES NO I S 2 55 -Horizontal Pumps 23CHPFCA 5T23CHPFCA 23 Cl-ARD PMP FLUID DRy COOLER YES NO YES NO I e 2 55 -Hnrizontal Pumps 23CHPFCB S023CHPFCS 23 CHARD PMP FLUID DRy COOLER YES NO YES NO I x 2 55 -Horiuoota/

Pumps 2351P-PMP 0O223SP SAFETY INJECT/ON PUMP 23 YES NO YES YES I 5 0 2 55 -Horizontzi Pumps 2IAFP-PMP 2IAFP AUS FEED PUMP NO,.21 YES NO YES NO Ix 2 05 -Horizontal Pamps 21BATP 218ATP 80R/C ACID TRANSPER PUMP 2/ YES NO YES NO I B A 2 55 -Horizoota/

Pumps 21CCP-PMP 21 CCP CCW PUMP NO,.21 YES NO YES YES Ix 2 05 -Horizontal Pomps 2TCHP-PMP 21 CAP NO. 21 CHARGING PUMP YES NO YES NO I B 5 2 05 -Honzontal Pomps 2ICSPFCA 21 CHPFCA 21 CHARD/NO PUMP FLUID DRIVE COOLER A YES NO YES NO I x0 2 US -Honzontal Pomps 2ICHPFCB 2TCHPFCB 21 CHARGING PUMP CRANK/CASE O/L COOLER YES NO YES NO / 1 2 US -Hooizontal Pumps 211ACCLWP 2TCLWP 21 S/A CMPR CL COOLING WATER PMP YES NO YES YES I 0 0 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-3 of 42 SCREEN SCREEN2" SCREENS 3 .C .REEN. S... " UNIT C~~~URRENT

~SSEL ddro ueot-EvrlS91 UNIT SSEL EQUIP'CASS

"".'.E PMENT "'EQPMENT T EQLJlPMENT DESCRIPTION undergo Mtntmwsat

".' :_ D~ Y 5 0-T SSIRD deIEE v,o K19!h R-SIviSY Prese~le InHer RSISnmt Sj-ic .? Configuration fti e eafiy ousd T..pý I 51,4 Colerol Cott C.'"N k-l*~~~-Tpec.*n Fund-.- ( Y. 11 P1OOO Humidiy Sytem.n 2 055 HUorional Pum~ps 21PWMP 21PWMP PRIM STR MAKE-UP PUMP 21 YES NO YES NO I ______2 055 HorizonIai Pump. ~ 22aATP 22aATP BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 22 YES NO YES NO I S x 2 SN -V~rSCI Pumps 21SVVP-PMP 0021SWP 21 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 06 -VOOCAl Pumops 22FOTP 0022FOTP FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP DO 22 YES NO YES YES 0 2 SN VAS,]ie Pum~p, 22RHRP-PMP 0022RHRP Rue PUMP NO.2 YES NO YES NO I B x 2 06 Veri~cal PumpsN 21RP 21RCPMP 21 RECIRC PUMP YES NO YES NO I T x x x 2 SN -Ver~aS Pump. 22RP 22RCPMP 22 RECIRC PUMP YES NO YES NO I T x S 2 SN6 Verteal Pumrps 22SWP 0022SWP 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 SN Vercai Pum~p 23FOTP 0023FOTP FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP 0.0. 23 YES NO YES NO 0 H x N 2 SN6 Vemcal Pumrps 23SVVP-PMP 0023SWP 23 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 SN VerSE,] Pumrps 24S1'P.PMP 0024SWP 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 06 VericEal Pumrps 25Se'P.PMP 0025SWP 25 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 SN Vertical Pumnps 26SWP-PMP 0026SWP 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP YES NO YES YES 0 H 2 SN *VerticalPumrps 21FOTP 21POTP FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 21 YES NO YES NO 0 x x 0 2 SN VertiEal Pumrps 21RHRP 21RHRP eRR PUMP NO. 21 YES NO YES YES I BS 2 07 Flird-Opelated ValsR 200A 0200A 21 LETDOWN ORIFICE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIN B 2 07 Flurid-Operated Valýe 200B 0200B 22 LETDOWN ORIFICE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH BS 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 200C 0200C 23 LETDOWN ORIFICE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIN S 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 204A 0204A ALT CHG FLOW NO 2 HOT LEG CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H E x 2 07 .Fluid-Operated Valws 20413 0204B CR0 FLOW NO 1 COLD LEG CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH B x a 2 07 Flui -perated Valves 201 201 LETDN UNE ISO VALVE NO YES NO I TIH ________2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 202 202 LETDN UNE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H B 2 07 .Flard-Operlald Vanes 203 203 ALT CHG FLOW NO02 HOT LEG CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I TVH 8 2 07 .Flad-Operated VaneS 212 212 ASS SPRAY CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES I TIN S 2 07 .Flird-Operated Valees 213 213 EXCESS LETDOWN CT RL VALVE YES NO YES YES I TIM S 2 07 -Faid-Operated Valves 215 215 EXC LEYDN LINE 3WAY CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH B x 2 07 .Fluid-Operated Vales 310 310 LETDOWN TO VCT DEMINERALIZERS YES NO YES NO 1 S x 2 07 -Flrad-Operated Val-e 549 549 PRESS RELIEF GAS ANALYZER CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NOI 2 07 .Fi,,d-Opera/ed YahOO 552 552 PRIMARY WATER MAKE-UP TO PRT VALVE YES NO YES NOI 2 07 -FlarEl-Operated VaIERN 791 791 CCW TO EXC LION HX-21 ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO 2 07 .Flad-Operated Valce 793 793 CCW RETURN PR DXC LID ISO VALVE YES NO YES NOI 2 07 Flu F/-perated Vales TS 796 CCW RET URN FIR EXC LION HX-2I ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO 2 07 -Fi~id-Operated VaIeeo 798 798 CCW TO EXC LION HX-21 ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO 2 07 F.F~id-OperatedV.1-e EN-I EA1 IA TO CBPA VENT YES NO YES NO I x x x x 2 07 -Flui-OperotodVal-re FCV-110A FCV-110A SONIC ACID SLENDER ACIC INPUT FLOW VALVE YES NO YES NO B x Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-4 of 42: 5. ... ..... ,. r. .SCREEN N ii.v'.CREEN., '.. t 2 REEN 3 .:SC I "N4 F -S T ' F " -*.'CURREN ACDBLNEROT OCN I UNIT aSaE EQUIP CLASS ~EOUPUENT T EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION

~ .< ?- Ueci~rdeeo Menstl ..2 Ervcem?->07-Fud +/-eae ValUe FC-10 FV11B SUTON RL. VALVE YES. NO eYESa NOtee I B x ecy-*4 the At Sank? -RepLacd IPEEP Ins~deSE.,a "v> Y' liesý 'Cetalvrrv

.>07.- Fuid,)pe .tdVles FV11 FC-.A PIMR AE MAKEU VALVE YES.- CeNOrle YEN~S N I TexIBrtd Cse~Cnd Cnrl. ~ 4->4. CYY.,OJ7Ui.TS%

5 '% '-? Aw7/C 4i m ,t High bt~Cr,~ ~ vt .b> Ousd lireddp Syedm 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves FCV-1IRB FCV-1 1t B b AID BLNDER OUT TO CR0 PM? YES NO YES NO I B x SUCTION CT RL VALVE 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves FCV-111A FCV-113A PRIMARY WATER MAKEUP VALVE YES NO YES NO I x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated FCV-111B FCV-111B BLENDER FLOW TO VCT CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I S 2 07 -FIid-Operae~d Valves FCV-1121 FCV-1121 21AFP RECITC LINE CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I x 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves FCV-.125-VLV FCV-1123 23AFPERECIRC LINE CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I x 2 07 -PlaidOperated Valves FCV-1 176 FCV-1176 JACKET WATER COOLER NET FLO CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I e x a e a 2 07 -Flaid-Operated Valves FCV-1176A FCV-117RA JACKET WATER COOLER RET FLO CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I a a a a 2 07 -Fluad-Operated Valves FCV-405A-VLV FCV-405D AUX FEED TO 22 SG FLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES I a 2 S7 -Fluid-Operated Valves FCV-406A-VLV FCV.405B AUX FEED TO 21 SO FLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES I x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves FCV-A0SC-VLV FCV-405BC A FEED TO 2200 FLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES I a 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves FCV-40CD-VLV FCV-405D AUX FEED TO 2480 FLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES I I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves FCV-A6A-VLV FCV-4D6A AFW CONTROL VALVE TO NO 21 SG YES NO YES YES I x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves FCV-41EB-VLV FCV-468 2 AFWP CONTROL VALVE TO NO 2230 YES NO YES YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves FCV4SEC-V2 V FCV-423C AXFW CONTROL VALVE TO NO 2300 YES NO YES YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves FCV-42DDVLV FCV-140D AFW CONTROL VALVE TO NO 24 ED YES NO YES YES I x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves HCV-1tB HICV-11t8 22AFWP PUMP SPEED CONTROL VALVE YES NO YES NO I It 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves HCV-123 HCV-123 EXCESS LETDOWN ITH OUTFLOW CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves HCV-142 H-CV-142 CHARGING FLOW TO REGEN I-E FLOW CTRL YES I NO YES NOIP VALVE1 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves [A-1 IA-t 22WA COMPRESSOR DITCH PIPING RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I a 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves IA-1-t 15-1-1 211A COMPRESSOR 018CH PIPING RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I a 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves IA-571 LA571 INSTRUMENT AIR RECEIVER RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I a x x a 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves LC-1207S LC-1207S LEVEL CONTROLLER YES NO YES NO I a x x a a 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves LC-1208S LC-1208S LEVEL CONTROLLER YES NO YES NO I a x a I x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves LC-1209S LC-1209S LEVEL CONTROLLER YES NO YES NO I a x x x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves LCV-112B LCV-112B RWST TO CHARGING PUMP SUCTION VALVE YES NO YES YES I B a a 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves LCV-1158 LCV-115R CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK LEVEL CONTROL YES NO YES NO I a 2 0F Vy C 5VALVE 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves LCV-459 LCV.459 LETDOWN CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I B 2 07 -Fluaid-Operated Valves MS-1-21 MS-1-21 21 SG MSIV YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 -Fluid-Opetated Valves MS-1-22 MS-1-22 22 SO MSIV YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 -Flvd-Operated Valves MS-1-23 MS-1-23 23 SG MSIV YES NO YES NO I T *2 07 -Flvid-Operated Valves MS-1-24 MS-1-24 24 SO MSIV YES NO YES NO I T X 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS-4SA MS-45A STEAM GEN 21 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS-45B MS-451 STEAM GEN 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Flaid-Operated Valves MS-45C MS-45C STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 5 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-5 of 42..SCRE+ :"":+= SC-ES , .. ..... .. ...... .... .. ..-.. ,. ...S,,Y-.v SCREEN 2 Plo.SN3 CEE Fv Safety Furudale++ : 9* **ms .* ., ---.. -y y ..9. ..,. .. ., UNT SEEUPCLASS EQUIPRIE NT EQUIPMEN EQ~PMENT DESCRIPTION Underg Eteam.~im EnvU~ -WUat~~~10 to R ergo les .nr ...a I f......ty ..... .l s Iv en ry D"..Cnfiguration thSa 'PE -- IaaA I 0-,e C. R .eta eta ear Cntin k 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS-45D MS-45D STEAM GEN 24 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I T x 2 07 Fluid-Op.erated Valves MS-46A MS-46A STEAM GEN 21 SAF ETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves MS-46B MS-46B STEAM GEN 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves MS-46C MS-46C STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS-460 MS-46D STEAM GEN 24 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07. Fluad-Operated Valves MS-47A MS-47A STEAM GEN 21 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T 2 07 -Fluad-Operated Valves MS-47E MS-47B STEAM GEN 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS-47C MS-47C STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 .Fluid-Operated Valves MS-47D MS-47D STEAM GEN 24 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS-48A MS-48A STEAM GEN 21 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS-48R MS-48B STEAM GEN 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x* 2 07 -Fiud-Operated Valves MS-48C MS-48C STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T .2 07- Fluad-Operated Valves MSA8D MS-48D STEAM GEN 24 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 .Fluid-Operated Valves MS-49A MS-49A STEAM GEN 21 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 -Flud-Operated Valves MS-49A MS-49B STEAM GEN 22 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves MS-49C MS-49C STEAM GEN 23 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves ME-49D MS-49D STEAM GEN 24 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES NO I T C 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1134 PCV-1134 ATM STM REL VALVE 21 SG YES NO YES NO I T x a 2 07 Fluad-Operared Valves PCV-1135-VLV PCV-1135 ATM STM REL VALVE 22 SG YES NO YES NO I T x x 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1 136-VLV PCV-1136 ATM STM REL VALVE 23 SG YES NO YES NO I T a a 2 07 -Fluid-Openated Valves PCV-t 137-VLV PCV-1137 ATM STM REL VALVE 24 So YES NO YES NO I T a a 2 07 FlUld-Operated Valves PCV-1139 PCV-1139 AUX FWP TURB STM SUPP PRESS REDUCING YES NO YES YES I 07498 aVALVE 2 0? Fluid-Opeatd Val- PCV-1213ýVLV PCV-1213 CRTL VALVE TO REGULATE PRESSURE ON #22 YES N0 YES YES I ABFWP BEARING COOLING WATER 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1214-VLV PCV-1214 S.G BLOWDOWN ISO VALVE 21 SO YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 Fluivd-Operated Valves PCV-1215-VLV PCV-1215 S.G BLOWDOWN ISO VALVE 22 SG YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1216-VLV PCV-1216 S.G. BLOWDOWN ISO VALVE 23 SG YES NO YES NO I T a 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1217-VLV PCV-1217 S.. SLOWDOWN ISO VALVE 24 SO YES NO YES NO I T x 2 07. Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1228-VLV PCV-1228 ISA SUPPLY CONT BLDG INSTR AIR HEADER YES NO YES NO I a X a 2 07 -Flud-Operated Valves PCV-1276 PCV-1276 N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES YES NO YES NO I x 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1310A PCV-1310A AU FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY YES NO YES NO SHUT-OFF VALVE 2 07. Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1310B PCV-1310B AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY YES NO YES NO I a SHUT-OFF VALVE 2 07 -Fluld-Operated Valves PCV-135 PCV-135 NON-REGEN HX OUT FLOW YES NO YES NO I x 2 07. Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-455C PCV-455C PRESSURIZER PORV YES NO YES YES I TV- a 2 07 -Flurd-Operated Valves PCV-456 PCV-456 PRESSURIZER PORV YES NO YES YES I TIH a Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-6 of 42 SCREE N.1 SCRE N 2. .CREEN. SCREN. ,P .SafetyFunNN

.'..4 B SEL~ _ _UNT SSBELEQUIP CAS EQUIPMENT

~EQUIPMENT EQUIPMIENT PESCRIP11O Unierg MaifoYahasa DecayNB1NON ID~Rgua east .High.gNNNI -DR (T IIHI 7..I .l:.p.eE.I+o N.. ..I.N .N. * ...r ...2 07 -Flid~-Operated ValvNs PCV-464 PCV-4N4 PRESSURIZER SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO _ YES YES I T/llx 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-466 PCV-466 PRESSURIZER SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I Til N 2 07 Flu~id-Operated Valves PCV-468 PCV-468 PRESSURIZER SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/H x 2 07 Flu~id-Operated ValvesN PRV-3105 PRV-3100 N2 TO PORV455C REG VALVE YES NO YES NO I TH x 2 07 Fli//-Operotod Valves PRV.3101 PRV-3101 N2 TO PORV 456REG VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/ll 2 07 -Flid,-Operated Val-e TCV.1103 TCV-1103 SW RET FROM CFCU TEMP CTRL VALVE YES NO YES YES I N 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves TCV-1104_

TCV.1104 FAN COOLING UNITS RTN BYPASS VALVE YES NO YES YES I N 2 07 -FlidI-OpeSEr Valves TCV-1105 TCV.1105 FAN COOLING UNITS RTN BYPASS VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 07 -*FliNd-Operaed Valves TCV-1 113 TCV-1113 INST AIR CC HXSWAJOUTLET TCV YES NO YES NO I N N N N N 2 S1A,- M/II,.Oper./d Valves 25GA-VLV 0250A 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B 2 S1A,- MotoI-Operwed ValvNs 250B-V-V 02500 22 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B N 2 S11A- MNINI-Operted Valves 250C.VLV 0250C 23 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B N 2 SMA -MNINI-Oper.aed Va/IesN 2500-VLV 02500 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B N 2 SMA -MNINI,0-tpred Valves 745A 0745A RHR 1-13 22 INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B N N 2 SMA -MNINI-Oper.Ied Valves 7450 0745B RHO HX 22 INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/ll S N N 2 SM1 -MNIN-Oper~tiad Val/IeN 822A-VLV 0822A RHR HX 22100O VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/ll S N 2 SMA -MotN-Op-rted Valves 022BI.VLV 508220 RHR FlU 211ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/ll B 2 ERA -M.1ar-Oer.teS Valves SOMa 0888A RHR HE 21 TO SI PUMPS SUCTION VALVE YES NO YES NO I S N N 2 SM1 -MN/Sr-Opera/Nd Valves 0055 00000 RHRI HE 21 TO SI PUMPS SUCTION VALVE YES NO YES NO I B N N 2 SM1 -UNIN/-Opera/ed Valves SSSH-VLV 0889lA CTMT SPRAY HEADER ISO VALVE YES NO YES SO I T/ll B N 2 SMA -motN/Opurated Valves 8898-VLV 088NS CTMT SPRAY HEADER ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/ll B N 2 SM1A- MNIN/.Operated ValveN SN4A-VLV 0S94A NO 21 ACCUM DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B N 2 SMA- MN/N-Opera/Nd Valves 894EI-VLV 0094B NO. 22 ACCUM DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B N 2 SMA- MoINIOpeIN/ed Valves 894C-VLV 0894C INO.23 ACCUM DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B N 2 SM1 -MNI~r-Opera/ed Valves SRAD.VLV 0894D NO. 24 ACCUM DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B N 2 011A- MO/O/-Op.,Nd Valves 1802A 1802A SIS RECIRC PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B 2 SMA -M/Itor-Operated Valves 10028 1802B SI0 RECIRC PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B N N 2 08A -MotorI-operated Valves l181-VLV 1801.VLV MOY RWST TO SIE PMP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B N 2 E8 -M.tp MO-Orated ValvNs 1807 1870 RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till BNNN 2 SMA. M-1N-Ope ated SNI/I-s 205-VLV 205-1Vi CHARGING FLOW TO RCS ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B N N N 2 SM1A. MNIoI.opeNINI Val/INN 222.1EV 222-VEV RCP SEAL WATER RETURN ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I Till S N 2 SE1A- Mota-Operated Va/INs 226 220 CHARGING FLOW TO RCS CTMT ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I Till B N 2 ESA -M/It/-Operilted Valves 333-VLV 333 BORIC ACID FEED TO CHO PUMPS VALVE YES NO YES NO I S N 2 S11A- M/II/I-OperNIed Va/INN 4925 4925 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO EI S 2 EMA- Motor-Operated Va/IeN 4920 4026 22 RCP SEAL INJ LINE/ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO 1 B1 N Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-7 of 42 SCREEN SCREENL SRCREEN S sc"LEN 4SanyaEao CURRENT .SSEL .____"___..'.._.

..: .e ...,:d .-a.,lar.;.

..j.t"iRrns...

8." 5.UNIT SSEL EQUIP CLASS EQUIPMET EQUIPMENT

.EQUIPMEN VDESCRIPTION no YES I B GRES FALEDFUE DETCTUnderLELIo Configuration tt, Va-Mes 5R3 15 lOVAVEYEoN ES NOI k.I~Otons ,II*r00 *l.? "s .6-aalIy -Snin .08A -Motor-Operated Valves 4927 4927 23 RCP SEAL NJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B 2 0EA -Motor-Operated Valves 4928 4928 24 RCP SEAL NJ LINE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 8 x 2 EaM -Motor-Operated Valves 5153 5153 GROSS FAILED FUEL DETECTOR SAMPLE LINE YES NO YES NO I B ISO VALVE 2 08A -MotorGOperaSed Valves 743 5154 RR FAILED FUEL DETECTOR SAMPLE LINE YES NO YES NO IB Sa EM- Mtorperatd Valves 54 5144 PMPDCGISOLATION SALVE 2 0SA -Motor-Operated Valves 535 535 PORV OLK VALVE 455C YES NO YES YES I TVH B 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 526 1 536 PORS TLP VALVE 456 YES NO YES YES I TVH a 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 730 730 849 SUCT LN ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I T/H S a 2 S8A -Motor-Operated Valves 731-VLV 731 RAN SUCT LN ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I YIN S a 2 QEA -Motor-Operated Valves 743-V8 V 743 RAN PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE YES NO YES NO I B a 2 EMA -Motor-Operated Valves 744 744 A9N PUMP DISCHARGE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I B a a 2 SaA -Motor-Operated Valves 744-VLV 748 W2 RRHS OUTLET ISO STOP VALVE YES NO YES NO I TV- S 2 08A -Moltr-Operated Va-ves 7478VLV 747 821 RRWS OUTLET ISO STOP VALVE YES NO YES NO I TV- S a a 2 0SA -Motor-Operaled Valves 788-WV 789 COW SUUF-RRP ISO YES NO YES NO 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 784-WVV 784 CCW RET FR RCP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO a 2 EMA -Motor-Operated Valves 786 784 OCC REH FR ROP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO 2 0EA -Mator-Operated Valves 789 78C CCW RET FR RCP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO a 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves 797-VWV 797 CLW S2PP-RCP ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 SMA -Motor-Operated Valves 882 1882 RWST TO 448 PUMP SUCTION VALVE _ YES NO YES NO I B8 z EMA -Motor-Operated Valves 8858 8858 CONTAINMENT SUMP TO RHN SUCTION VALVE YES NO YES NO 1 8 a a 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves FCV-425-AWV FCV-425 CCW RET FR RIPs ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO 2 SM1 -Molar-Operated Valves HCV-683 HCV-638 #21 RHE FIT OUTLET CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I B a I 2 SM1A- Motar-Operaled Valves HCV-640 HCV-640 *822 948 HX OUTLET CTRL VALVE YES NO YES NO I B ax 2 08A -Maol-Operated Valves LCVl112C LCVl112C SOT OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO IS a 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves VLV SWN-41-lA FCU-21 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H x 2 E8A -Mator-Operated Valves W -- STWN-41t-FCU-22 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H a WVV SN-A SWN-41-2 FCU-22 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H x 2 EMA- Molar-Operated Valves SN12 SVAR-d-2B FCU-22 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H at V-V 2 OEA -Motor-Operated Valves SWVN-41-3A FCU-23 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H a VLV 2 0EA -Motor-Operated Valves SWVN-41-3B-SVN-41-3B FCU-23 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H x VLV 2 E8A -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-41-4A-SVVN-41-4A FCU-24 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x VLV 2 08A, -Motor-Operated Valves VSWVN-41-4B-SVVN-4 t-, FCU-24 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H x S EMA -Motol-Operaed Valves STAN-Al-5A-SWN41-5A FCU-25 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H A 2 SMA -Molor-Oparald Valves SAN41-5B-SWN-41-5B FCU-25 SW INLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I x S 0SM -Moor-Operaled Valves VLV -P S I S Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-8 of 42..... ....RS T~t 3ECR11N 1 FEdMgo u5gntjiN 2 t SCREENt 3 SRFjAF- a-~c UNIT SEMLIOpIPCLASd S EQUNI4P M A vUCU-PVE SERVICE WATERSOUEISOTION YES NO YES NO .

v. ~SWN-44-1B FCU.21 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H 2 SEA -MotI I-Operated V.Pves ,AVV .N AS ULOOI 2 SEA- Moto-Operated Valves VWIN-44-2A-SWN-44-2A FCU-22 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YE I H VLV 2 08 , oto-Opeate Vaves SWN-44.SA-2 08A- Motor-Operated Valves W.V SWN-44-A2 FCU-22 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x VlV 2 0EA -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-4.34-SWN-442-3 FCU-23 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H I VLV 2 08A -Motor-Operated Valves SWNt.V W-433C-3SWOTE S AV YS N E E -2 SEA. Motor-Operated Valves SWN-4-4AA SWN-44-3A FCU-24 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x VLV 2 08A -Motor-Operated VIalve WVV.V43 SWN-44-AR FCU-23 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H 2 SEA -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-4-4A-SWN-44-SA FCU-24 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H VLV-V SN-44-SB-2 0SA. Motor-Operated Valves W.V SWN-44-SA FCU-25 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H 2 SEA -Motor-Operated Valves VNN-44-5B-SWN-44-5B FCU-25 SW OUTLET ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H Y VLV 2 0SA -Motor.Operated Valves SWN.5V-IA-SWN-51-1A 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H A SN .- 5f-2A-SEA -Motor-Operated Valves VLV SWN-51-2A 22 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x 2 0SA -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-51-3A-SWN-51-3A 23 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H VLV 2SVVN-51-4A-2 0SEA- Motorperted Valves VLV SWN-514A 24 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H S 2 EA -Motor-Operated Valves VV SWN-51-5A 25 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H I SWN-71-1A.

2 0EA -Motor-Operatd Valves VLV SWN-71-tA FCU-21 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H X SWN-71-2B-2 SEA. Mator.Opervto VeeRS .VV SWN-71-18 FCU-21 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES YES I H x 2 0A -Motor-Operated Valves VLV SWN.71-2A FCU-22 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x SWN-71.2B-2 SEA.- MotorOpereted Valves VLV SWN-71-2E FCU-22 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x 2 a *~ -prldVl SWN-71-3Aý W-1a C E O YS N 2 0SA.- Moto rOporat ed Valves VLV 7WN 3A FC U-23 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x W-71-SE-2 SA -Motor-Operated Valves .VL SWN-71-3B FCU-23 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H A 2 88A -Motor-Operated Valves 5L1 SWN-715A FCU-24 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x 2 0.A -Motor-Operated Valves SWN-71-4A-LSVN-71-4B FCU-24 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x VLV 2 01A -Moto-Oprate Vaves SWN-7t-5A-08 oo.prae avs VLV SWN-71-5A FCU-25 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I A *2 OA -Motar-Operatled Valves SVLVN7-B SWN-71-513 FCU-25 MOTOR ISO VALVE YES NO YES NO I H x 2 08B -Satenoid-Ope~ated Valves 519 i519 PRIMARY WATER MAKE-UP TO PRT VALVE YES NO YES NO I 2 08R -Solenoid-Operated Valves LCV-1207A LCV-1207A LEVEL CONTROL VALVE YES NO YES YES I x x

• x 2 50 -SoJenoid-Operated Valves LCV-12078 LCV-1207B FUEL OIL DAY TANK LEVEL 21 YES NO YES YES I A A A A A 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves LCV-1208A LCV-1208A LEVEL CONTROL VALVE YES NO YES YES I A A A A 2 085 -Soleno,d-Operated Valves LCV-1208B LCV-1208B FUEL OIL OAY TANK LEVEL 22 YES NO YES YES I

• x At A 2 -R -S~eold-iperated Vadves LCV-1209A ILCV-1209A LEVEL CONTROL VALVE YES NO YES YES x x

• x 2 08B -Solenoid-Oper ted Valves LCV-t1209B LCV-12098 FUEL OIL DAY TANK LEVEL 23 YES NO YES YES Ix x x x Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-9 of 42 SC .~ REEN SCRIF IN2 SCREEN. Eý CRAEE' 4 FIN ..~ yFNNEI U ~ T T~ CURflENI NOEL $UNIT SSEL EQUIP CAS EUPMIENT EQUIPMENT

~ EQUOIPMENIT DE ISCRIPTION

-Undero aawatsm I ER~Nl?..p-ID to Regular leat 6rn. of H igh ~ Re-eVelly PNNNNI mErY I ..eonfiguration theESafety OtNld. TerapI B d-eUleded Inpetins NEERl. Huricfy SysNieam 2 08B -SoIenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1230 SOV-1230 SG21 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T 2 08B -Solenoid-operated Valves SOV-1231 SOV-1231 SG 21 MSIV SOY YES I NO YES I No I T 2 08E -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1232 SOV-1232 SG 21 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T x 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1233 SOV-1233 SG 21 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T *2 08B -Seno d-Oper ted Vales SOV-1234 SOV-1234 SG 22 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T *2 0B -Sotenoid-Operaed Val-eN SOV- 235 SOV- 235 SG 22 MSE SOV YES NO YES NO I T 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1236 SOV-1236 SG 22 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T N 2 08E -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1237 SOV-1237 So 22 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T x 2 08 -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1238 SOV-123E SG 23 MEN SOV YES NO YES NO I T N 2 08B -Solenoid-Opefated Valves SOV-1239 SOV-1239 SG 23 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T *2 OBN -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1240 SOV-1240 SG 23 MEIN SOV YES NO YES NO I T *2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1241 SOV-1241 SG 23 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T *2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1242 SOV-1242 SG 24 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T x 2 08B -Solenoid-Ope ated Valves SOV-1243 SOV-1243 SG 24 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T x 2 08 -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1244 SOV-1244 SG 24 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T a 2 08S -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1245 SOV-1245 SG 24 MSIV SOV YES NO YES NO I T x 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1258 SOV-1258 CST LEVEL CONTROL SOV YES NO YES NO I x 2 081 -SNlenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1276 SOV-1276 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I x 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1276A SOV-1276A SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES 2 0EE -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1310 SOV-1310 AUX FWP TURN STEAM SUPP SOV YES NO YES NO x 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1311 SOV-1311 AUX FWP TURN STEAM SUPP SOV YES NO YES NO x 2 08B -Solenod-Operated Valves SOV-200A SOV-200A 200A INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I TIH x 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves OV-200B SOV-200B 200B INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES NO I TIH *2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-200C SOV-200C 200C INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID YES NO YES YES I TIH x 2 08B -Solenold-Operated Valves SOV-201 SOV-201 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I TIH x 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-202 SOV-202 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/H x 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-204A SOV-204A SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/H N N 2 ONB -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-204E SOV-204B SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I T/H N 2 08B -Solenold-Operated Valves SOV-212 SOV-212 SOLENOID VALVE. PRESSURIZER AUX SPRAY YES NO YES NO I T/H x 2 08B -SoNenoid-Operated Valves SOV-213 SOV-213 SOLENOID VALVE. INITIATES EXCESS LETDOWN YES NO YES YES I TIH x FLOW 2 SEE -Solenoid-Operated Salves NOV-N5N SOY-ANN SOLENOID VALVE, ELOCK LETDOWN FROM RCS YES NO YEN NO I TIN x ON LOW PRESSURIZER LEVEL I I EXCESS LETDOWN HN COOLING WATER 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-791 SOV-791 ISOLATION SOLENOID VALVE NO 791 YES NO YES NO I YIN N 2 8 ONE S- end-OpeNted Valves SOV-7N3 SOV.793 CVCS EXCESS LETDOWN HN INSTRUMENT AIR Y SUPPLY SOLENOID VALVE 793 YES NO YES NO EXCESS LETDOWN ix COOLING WATER 2 SNE- Salenord-Operated Valves SOV-796 SOV-79E ISOLATION SOLENOID VALVE NO 796 YES NO YEN NO I TIN N Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-10 of 42 SC..RE. .. SRE SC E.. .3 I SSCREEN4 CURRENT SSEL~UNIT SSEa EQUIP CLASS EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT.

EQUIP" ENT DESCRIPTION A. M E t?I D i) IASeilsmi?

C.R~uar -M 'o Replacd IpS EE eselt -Re .1~~ Pnsae iety ee Craea_______________________

A Cnligamfla thecR Sal id Tee I; B-aIa4< Ceerel; Ucenteal .Ceetl 2 08 -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-798 SOV-798 EXCESS LETDOWN Hx COOLING WATER YES NO I Tx ISOLATION SOLENOID VALVE NO 798 2 S9 -Fans 'FAN22SUP CCR SUPERVISORY PANELS VENT FAN 22, MZ1 YES NO YES YES 2 09 -Fans 22CRF.BIWR 0022CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 22 YES NO YES NO I Tim x 2 09 Fans 23CRF-BLWR 0023CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 23 YES NO YES NO I TfH a 2 09 -Fans 24CRF-BLWR 0024CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 24 YES NO YES NO I T/H 2 S9 -Fans 25CRF-BLWR 0025CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 25 YES NO YES NO I TIH a 2 09 -Fans TlCRF-BLWR 2ICRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 21 YES NO YES NO I TIa CCRAC1 CCRACI 2 11 -Chillers CCR CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS) YES NO YES NO I a x x x x CCRAC2 CCRAC2 2 11- Chillers CCR CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS) YES NO YES NO I x x x x x 2 12 -Air Compressors 22LAC 0022LAC INST AIR COMP 22 YES NO YES NO I a a a a 2 12 -Air Carpressars 22LACJC 0022IACJC INST AIR COMP 22 JACKET COOLER YES NO YES NO I a x x x x 2 12. Air Corpressors 21EDAC- 21EDAC STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 21 YES NO YES NO I a x x a COMP _____2 12 -Air Compressors 2155AC 215AC INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 21 YES NO YES NO I a a a a *2 12 -Air Compressors 211ACJC 211ACJC INST AIR COMP 21 JACKET COOLER YES NO YES NO I a a a 2 12 -Air Compressors 2 2EDAC 22EDAC STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 22 YES NO YES NO I x x x x COMP _____2 12 -Air3Cmpressors 2SEDAC- 23EDAC STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 23 YES NO YES NO I a a a COMP _____21MGS 2 13 -motor Generators 21 MG Set 21 MACHINE GENERATOR SET YES NO YES NO I X 21MGS 2 13 -motor Generators 22 MG Set 22 MACHINE GENERATOR SET YES NO YES NO I X 2 14 -Distribution Panels EPNL21 DC DIST;PNL 21 125 VDC DISTRIBUTION PNL 21 PC3 YES NO YES NO I x x x 2 1DitiuinPnl NL1A DC DIST;PNLa aaa 2 14 -Dis21bAAan Panels DPNL21AA 125V DC DISTRIBUTION AREA, EPF1 YES NO YES NO I x x x x 2 14 -Distrbution Panels OPNL22 DC DIST;PNL 22 125 VDC DISTRIBUTION PNL 22 PC4 YES NO YES NO I a x a a 2 14 -Disnibuon Panels DPNL23AN C3DIST;PNL 125 VDC DISTRISUTION PNL 23AA EPF3 YES NO YES NO I x a a 2 14 -Disebsubion Panels PPNL21 DC PWR;PNL 21 125 VDC POWER PANEL #21 PCI YES NO YES NO a x a *2 14 -Distibutaon Panels PPNL22 DC PWR;PNL 22 125 VOC POWER PANEL #22 PC2 YES NO YES NO a a a a 2 14 -Distibuton Panels PPNL23 DC PWR;PNL 23 125 VDC POWER PANEL #23 EPB3 YES NO YES NO a x a a 2 14 -Distnibuson Panels PPNL24 DC PWR;PNL 24 125 VDC POWER PANEL #24 EPA9 YES NO YES NO ax a x 2 14 -Dstsibuton Panels EDBI EDBI STATIC INV. #24 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH YES NO YES NO I a x a x 2 14 -Distibuton Panels E0B2 EDB2 800A BATTERY #24 CIRCUIT BREAKER YES NO YES NO I a a a 2 14 -Distnbulson Panels E0S5 EDB5 STATIC INV. 121 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH YES NO YES NO I a a a 2 14 -Distributon Panels EDB6 EAB6 STATIC INV. #22 MANUAL BY-PASS SWITCH YES NO a a a 2 14 -Distbubon Panels EDBR EDS8 800A BATTERY #23 CIRCUIT BREAKER YES NO YES NO I xa a 2 14 -Dis.nbuban Panels EDCI EDCI STATIC INV 823 MANUAL SY-PASS SWITCH YES NO YES YES I 5 x x a a 2 14 -Distnbuton Panels EDDS- EDD1 TRANSFER SWITCH YES NO YES NO I a x a Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-11 of42 CRE. SCREENz SCREENZ2 5RF Fl" Safety Faeelti-r :t. ,W is. l..d..Bor..ani

.,n.r. .coetf..UI S EUPCLASS EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENdT DESCRIPTION UtýýIeg Maetajnat EevIr-ernaI"-< ConlIguraio~n Bhe B Barely Repae Huridde Tamp R.er. C .1 2 14 -DiNsribuon Panels EDD-2 EDD2 TRANSFER SWITCH YES NO YES NO I +2 14 D~sbibutIon Panels EDD-3 EDD3 TRANSFER SWITCH YES NO YES NO x *2 14 Disbibubon Panels EDD-4 EDD4 TRANSFER SWITCH YES NO YES NO I x x x *2 14 -OiNsbudon Panels IBUS23A EP3 f1R8 VAC INSTRUMENT BUS #'23A YES NO YES NO I x x x 2 14 -Distribution Panels EPF6 120 VAC DISTRIBUTION PANEL #2 YES NO YES NO I x x x x x 2 14 Dissbuibon Panels IBUS24 PEB 118 VAC INSTR BUS 24 YES NO YES YES I x x x 2 14 -Distibutaon Panels IBUS23 PET 118 VAC INSTR BUS 23 YES NO YES NO I x x x It 2 14 -Disbibudon Panels IBUS21 PER 118 VAC INSTR BUS 21 YES NO YES YES I x x x x 2 14 -Distbution Panels IBUS22 PEN 118 VAC INSTR BUS 22 YES NO YES YES I x 2

• x x 2 1 ittuinPnl N O2 PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP 023 YES NO YES NO I x 2 14 -Distbon Panels PNLDISTRIBUTION PANEL 2 14 -Dtisvilbutin Panels PNL PD-3 PRESSURiZER BEATER BACKUP GROUP #21 E O YS N DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2 4OsiodnPni NP4 PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 YES NO YES NO Ix It 2 14 -isbuon Panels PNP-4 DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2 15 -Battenes on Ranks BATT21 BATT21 BATTERY BANK YES NO YES NO I x x x 2 15 -Batteres on Racks BATT22 BATT22 BATTERY BANK YES NO YES YES < x x x 2 15 -Batteries an Racks BATT23 BATT23 BATTERY BANK YES NO YES NO I x x 2 15 -Batteries on Ranks BATT24 BATT24 BATTERY BANK YES NO YES NO x x 2 16 -Battery Chargers B Invertors EGA1 EGAI l0 KVA STATIC INVERTER #21 YES NO YES NO I 2 16 -Battery Chargers & Invertars EGA2 EGA2 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #22 YES NO YES NO I x x x x 2 16 -Battery Chargers & lnvertors BATTCHG24 EGA3 BATTERY CHARGER 24 YES NO YES NO I x x

• x 2 16 -Battery ChargeN & Enverters EGA4 EGA4 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #24 YES NO YES NO I I x x x x 2 16 -Battery Chargers & Invert-rN BATTCHG23 EGA7 BATTERY CHARGER 23 YES NO YES NO I x x 2

• I 2 16 -Battery Charges & Invaertors EGAB EGA8 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #23 YES NO YES NO I 2 x x

• x 2 16 -Battery Chargers B Invertors BATTCHG21 MID BATTERY CHARGER 21 YES NO YES NO I x x x x *2 16 -Battery Chargers & Bnverters BATTCHG22 MN3 BATTERY CHARGER 22 YES NO YES NO I x x x 2 17 -Engine-GeneratorN 22EDG-ENG 0022EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO 22 YES NO YES NO I

• x I 2 17 -Engine-Generatars 23EDG-ENG 0023EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 YES NO YES NO I x x x

• x 2 17 -Engine-Generators 21EDG-ENG 21EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 YES NO YES NO I x x x x x 2 1 nnetonRcs IP2-VC INST RK 19 INSTRUMENT RACK 19 YES NO YES NO I x x x x 2 18 -RInsttJrents as Ranks RACK 19 I I R 2 18 -Instruments on Racks RK-20 INST RK 20 INSTRUMENT BACK 20 YES NO YES NO I x

• x 2 18 Instruments an Raks IP2RVC INST RK 21 INSTRUMENT RACK 21 YES NO YES NO I x x x *2 18- Intruentson Rcks RACK 21 2 1B InstTuruents on Racks INST RK 24 INSTRUMENT RACK 24 YES NO YES NO I

• x x I *2 18 -Instruments on Racks IP2-VC INST RK 4A INSTRUMENT RACK 4A ES NO YES NO I x x RACK 4A 1 2 lI Instruments as Ranks RP2-VC-K8-INST RK 4B INSTRUMENT RACK 4B YES NO YES NO 8x 2 1lB-8 Instrunan an Raks RACKS INST RK S INSTRUMENT RACK 5 YES NO YES NO I __x _2 8-Is~et nRcs RACK 5 Engineering Report No. lP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-12 of 42 LSEL EQUIP CLASS CURRENT EQUIPMENT ID~1 SSEL EQUIPMENT ID SCREEN,. I, 2 SCEE 2.SREN SCREEN 4 Fl- Sonoly Fumed-EQUiPM ENT DESCRIPTIONI

~UrnI rgo~Regular Coallgatatton IS #w9 a at least one of ,the , Safety Ro.pae d I .EEE .jI-, 4.Ennlla~alflt?

re~arp, 8-t"lot, ae Reacvl~ty Ip__~al Canot'o Cann tI-an-ay paten Meat a -a ..J CantalnItlellI

.~ F F..........F I> 1-~i-i~+/- 8 F 9 9 -I 2 18 -instruments on Racks INST RK 9 INSTRUMENT RACK 9 YES NO YES NO I x a a x 2 18 -InstrumentS on Racks P2D- PNLEDGA EDG AUXILIARIES CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I ax xa 2 18 Istrumnts onRacks IP2.EDG8 RC DE18 -SInc mn ts on Racks "ENGAUXSR ENGINE AUXILIARIES STARTER RACK YES NO YES NO I x a a a x 2 18 -Instruments on Racks SOV-1139-1 SOV-1139-1 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I x 18 -Instrumentc on Racks SOV-1139-2 SOV-1139-2 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I x 2 18 -Instruments on Racks SOV-1139-3 SOV-1139-3 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES a x 2 18 -Instruments on Racks SOV-1139-4 SOV-1139-4 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I 2 18 -Innstuments on Racks SOV-1139-5 SOV-1139-5 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES YES I X 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-411A TE-411A RCS Loop 21 DELTA T TEMP YES NO YES NO I T/H B a 2 19- Temperature Sensors TE411AI1 TE-411A1 RCS LOOP 21 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIH B a 2 19 Temperature Sensors TE-4118 TE-4118 RCS LOOP 21 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I T/H a a 2 19 Temperature Sensors TE-412A TE-412A RCS LOOP 21 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I T/ll S x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-4128 TE-412B RCS LOOP 21 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TIH B a 2 19 -T emperatura Sensors TE-413 TE-413 RCS LOOP 21 COLD LED WIDE RANGE TEMP YES NO YES NO I T/H I x 2 19TempratrSenors T-421A TE21 RCELEMENP 22OTLETMPELEMENO YES Y 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-421A TE-421A RCS LOOP 22 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TIH B a 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-4212 TE-4218 RCS LOOP 22 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TI/ B 0 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-422A1 TE-422A RC LOOP 22 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YE I TIH B a 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE.422A TE-422A RCS LOOP 22 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I T/H B a 2 19 -Temperalure Sensors TE-4223 TE-4223 RCS LOOP 22 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I T/H a x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-423 TE-4232 RCS LOOP 22 COLD LED TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIH a x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-431A TE-431A RCS LOOP 22 DOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIH S x 2 19 Temperature Sensors TE-431A TE-431A RCS LOOP 23 OTD LEO TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I T/H B x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-431A TE-431Al RCS LOOP 23 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TIH B x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-432S TE.423A RCS LOOP 23 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TIH B a 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-432A TE-432 RCS LOOP 23 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I T/H B a 2 19 -Temnperature Sensors TE-432 TE432B RCS LOOP 23 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TIH B x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-4AIA TE-441A RCS LOOP 24 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I T/H N x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-441B TE-4410 RCS LOOP 24 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TVH B a 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-441A TE-442A RCS LOOP 24 HOT LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TIH B x 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-442B TE-442B RCS LOOP 24 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES YES I TiE B a 2 19 -Teemperature Sensrs TE-443 T E-443 RCS LOOP 24 COLD LEG TEMP ELEMENT YES NO YES NO I TVH x 2 20 Ins. & Con bol Pa nels & IP2-C S AI:RACK REACTOR PROTECTION C H I INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I Cabnets CCR RACK Al 20 -Cofl PanalsE& CCR RACK A10;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH II INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 0 2 Ca .RnesA C. ~A10 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-13 of 42 2SCRENR-ECEEN SCEN SCREEN2 SRE CEN r 5 5 5 S. .EJLA.P CLASS EQUWPMENT EQU.P.EW E.P ENT DESCRIP.., ....... ..Uero Metabiat.D ro si c :. " e scr leastrse o 'l .... n+ e 41E h " ' ." so "?ace.PEE.. ... C n.iga.aton til e ...cos ,.w. TampI .Con*,m e .' " Hearct .. et.n, , .me.......i " ..Inspe.tionrs (1na) tn. ...... S...a....20 -Inst. & Contel Panels & P2--CB 2 Cabiners CCR RACK All;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION Ch II INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I a 20 CaIst. o~lPnl CCR RACK Al2;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CHMII INST LOGIC RACK YES NO TEN NO I 2 Cabine ts A12 2 20 -Instr & Contel Panels & IP2-CB Cabines CCR RACK A2 AT;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH I INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I x 2 20 -Instr K Contol Panels K IP2-CE Cabinets CCR RACK A3 A2;RAC K REACTOR PROTECTION CM I INST LOGIC RACK YES NO TEN NO I _____2 20 -InsA. & Contol Panels I IP2-C B A4,RACK REACTOR PROTECTION;CH I INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I a Ca2inets CCR RACK Aa C20 -InstC. & ConAol Panels CAIP2 AS;RACK CVCS INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I Cabinets CCR RACK A E 20 -Inst. & Connol Panels K P-COB-53-Cainet CCR RACK A? A7;RACK ICSRUM E NT LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I a a 2 20 -Inst. & Contrl Panels IP2-CB Cabinet CCR RACK AS Aa;RACK INSTRUMENT LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I x x 2 20 -Insm. & Control Panels IP2-CB Cabinets CCR RACK At AS;RACK INS T LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I x x 2 20 -rinstr. & Control Panels & 2 Cabi2 -s CCR RACK AP AP;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CHII INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I a 2 20 -Inst. & Connol Panels & IP2-CO Cabinets CCR RACK B1S B;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH MI INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I x 2 20 -Instr. & Contaol Panels IP2-Ca Cab.&ine CCR RACK B0IB;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH III INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I a 2 20 -Lnstr, & Contro Panels & IP2-CB 2 Ca2inets CCR RACK O-O 02RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH III INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO II Cabinets & RAC B3 B3,RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CH III INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I R 2 Cbnt25 -Inst. K Cantal Panels & CRP2-COB-SO-RC B6 BRAC K INSTRUMENT LOGIC RACK YES NO SEN NOI Cabinet CCR RACK OR2 1 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & LP2-COB Cabinets CCR RACK 8t B8;RACK INSTRUMENT LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 20 -Inst. & Contol Panels & IP2-B-5C-Cabinets CCR RACK BO Ba;RACK REACTOR PROTECTION CEIV INST LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I a 2 20 -Inst. A Cnntnl Panels 9P2-COB 2Cabinets CCR RACK DIS ;RACK LOGIC RACK YES NO YES NO I 2 20 -Inst & Conaol Panels K P2-CB-5N-Cabinets CCR RACK El El;RACK REACTOR CONTROL SYS INST RACK YES NO YES NO I a 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & IP2-CBO53-Cabinets CCR RACKET E7:RACK SAFEGUARDS RELAY CAAiNET YES NO YES NO I I 20 -Inst, & Contrl Panels & IP2-CO Cabinets CCR RACK E8 E8;RACK RUEATRVSONROL SYSBINET RC YES NO YES NO I x 20 -Instr. & Contrl Panels & EPK1 EPK1 SW PMP 021 STRAINER CONY PNL YES NO YES NO 0 In Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Contrl Panels & EPK2 EPK2 SW PMP #22 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 Ha Cabinets 2 2C-lnst. K Cantel Panels K EPK2 EPK2 SW PMP #22 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 Ha Cabinets 2 CabinestKCatlPnsK EPKR EPKR SVV PMP 020 STRAINER CONY PNIL YES No YSE NO 0 In a 2 20 -Inst. & Contrl Panels & EPK5 EPKI SW PMP #25 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 H a Cabinets 2 0 -Instr. & Contiol Panels 2 Cabinets EPK6 EPK6 SIN PMP #26 STRAINER CONT PNL YES NO YES NO 0 HE It Cabinets CCR RACK Fl I F;RACK REACTOR CONTROL SYS INST SACK YES NO YES NO I 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels IP2-CO-SO-Cabnets F C IAKF FT;RAC K SUPERVISORY CA13INETYE NOES OI Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-14 of 42 7-z ~ " C~I SCREEN 2 "4r CURREkfWj S3E __E 2TREJ E Q- Ln PPMe E Nan ensIP EN ES J~ D 44Ton t Boe Aoua -Eisnnt S'gnc ý wflgu .. tet 5 Sa~ely I itn IEB BIdaI Teeept Bakd ene Cnt Cetnto R t Cneansen rPI7C-tKPO FRion ?-"t4 RELY710 2 l CantalICAC YES NO YES NOI 2 Ca.1ns -CRECK 01 GIAC YS O ES N 2 20 -Instr & Control Panels & 1P2-C B-53-Cabnets CCR RACK GI 02 RACK SAFEGUARDS RELAY CABINET YES NO YES NOI 2 20 -Ins?, & Canneol Panels & 'Pr2 CB-O- 03 RACK SAPEGUARDS RELAY CABINET YES NO YES NOI x Cabnes CC RACK 03 2 20 Ins Si Cannrol Panels & 1P2-CB 04 REC SAEUNSRLYCBIE E O YS Caninets CCR RACK 04G;AK SFGURSRLYCBNE E O YS N 2 20 'Inst. & Cantrol Panels A 1P2-C B-53-Cabnets CCR R ECK HI HI;RACK PSAF OURO S RE L YCEAH I NETA YES NO YES NOI x 2 20 -last. & Canneol Panels S P2-CE-5S-H2;RACK POXBORO RECK H2 BiAS YES NO YES NOI Cabncels CCR RACK H2 2 20 -Instr. E Cenlmt Panels & 1P2-CB-SS-H;AK FXOORC 2EA E O YS N Cabinets CCR RACES H2 ;AC FOBRIAKH J E O YS N 2 20 l nsnr. A Cnntrol Panels & IP2-CB-SS-H3;RACK POXBORO RACK Ha;CANL1TANA EJA S YES NO YES NO IB Cabnets CCR RACK HA 2 20 -tInstr & Canneol Panels A 1P2-CB HRACK FOXBORO RECK 14; CHANNEL 2 TRAIN B: EiJa YES NO YES NO IB Cabnes; CCR RACK HIS 2 20 -551?. A Cnntrol Panels E PNL SYNCH DIESEL GENERATOR SYNCHRONIZING PANEL YES NO YES NO I B n x B-CaninetsI 2 20 -Instr. &SControlPanels

& PNL EPAIS0 PAS EXHA&CB8PR0PFAN 21 CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I a a e a Cabnets 2 20 -Insti. & Canneol Panels & EPOR PNL EPOR REMOTE UNDERYOLTAGE RELAY CABINET. BUS YES N0 YES NO I 5 B B B B Canines 2A0 2 20 -Inst. & Canneol Panels A PNL EPOT REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CABINET. BUS YES NO YES NO I B B B B Canets 5AI 2 20 -Inst. S Canneol Panels & EPG8 PNEPOS REMOTE UNDERVOLYAGE RELAY CABINET, BUS YES NO YES NO I a e x Cabnes.3 2 5 20 Inst. & Canneol Panels & EPG9PBEG REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CABINET, BUS YES NO YES NO I B B B B 2 Cabnets PNSE A 2 20 -Instr. & Conaal Panels & PNL PAP CCR PANEL YES NO YES NO I a a n a Caninets 1 1____2 20 -Inst & Canneol Panels S lP2-CE3 PLP UN AE BYE O YS S Cabnets CCR PNL PB PN F FG_ ANLFBYE O ES y Ix 2 20 -Instr. & Canneol Panels & 1P2-CB-SS-PNL PAP PLIGHT PANEL YES NO YES NO I B B B Caninets CCR PNIL Ft 2 20 -Insnr. & Canneol Panels A IP2-CES-SR PLFR PIH5ONRLPNLYS 5 YS 5 Caninets CCR P5L FRPER B LGTCNRLPNL E O YS N 2 20 -Instr. &Conneol Panels & IP2-CE-S-PC PC FLIGHT PNL PC YS NO YES NOI B 5 B B Cabinets .CCR PNL FPC LCYSN 2 20 -Instr. A Canneol Panels & IP2-CE-SS.F N1C aLGH BAE BE Bo BE O 2 Caninesa CCR PNL PC PN PC LGTPNL E O YS N 2 20 -Inst. S Canneol Panels &S PNL POP PLIGHT CONTROL PANEL YES NO PBS NO I B B x Caninets 2 20-nInstr

&Canneol PanelsE& PNL MPS CCR VENT CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I B B x CaninetsI 2 20 -Instr. S Canneol Panels & PNL PHGRP PRESSURIZER HEATER GROUND RELAY PANEL YES NO YES NO a Caninets 2 20 -Instr. & Canneol Panels & PYL FPS EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL YES N0 YES NO I a s 5 B a Caninets1 2 20 -Instr & Canneol Panels & PNL P01 EDO 22 CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I n a a a Caninets __________________

2 20 -last. & Canneol Panels & PNL P02 ESDS 2 CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I B B B Canines I____ I____2 20 -Inst. & Canneol Panels & OPAN-PYS-?

PNL PT? LOCAL CCR VENT CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES sO I 5 x Cabnets ______________

2 20 _ Instr. & Canneol Panels & N 0 EOACRVN CONTROL PANEL YES NO PB OI a a a Caninets PNL PY2 REMOTE ________VENT_____

2 0 -aý Inst. & Canneol Panels & P2CE-S 2 0 RCC PN5L3 PNL PY2A-PY2 PANEL PY2 EXTENSION YES NO YES NO I B 5 x Caninets PY2 ...,. _ _ _ _ _"._'__ _ .. " .. .." .' ., ..,' .___ ',.'. ..,.". ". : -, ', _,: __.. .'. _, _,,_. __I PYc2,A Not. .:, ..."s...: ,.:...

Engineering Report No. iP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-15 of 42 8CiCUR. SCREEN2 SCREEN'.......UIPC. , ...CURRENT:"sas.

.......N ' E.... .-.. .." ... ... NJenNi " : " "...-..:: .,..C

.. ...... .NR. _______ions_ .U- C I.NEN.yn 2 20 -Ie & ControN Panels & IP2-CE 2Casbines CCR PNL PNL PY2B-PY2 PANEL PY2 EXTENSION YES NO YES NO I N x X PY2B 20 -Instr & Control Panels 8& P2-C B PNL SA SUPERVISORY CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I N N N N x 2 Cabines CCR PNL SA 2 20 -Instr & Control Panels & P2-CE-A- PNL SAF SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x x x x Cabinets CCR PNL SAR 2 20 -instr. & Control Panels & 9P2-C& Cabinets CCR PNL S,,, PNL SB-1 SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x x x IP2-06-53.

2 C2a-inets.

otolPnl IP2-C B-53-2 20 -st & Contol panels & CCR PNL SBR- PNL SBIF ANNUNICATOR PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x x N N 2 20 -Instr. & ControN Panels & P2-CE-SO-PNL S0-2 SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I N N N N N Cabinets CCR PNL SE-2-P2CB-53-2 20 -nstr. & Contro Panels & CCR PNL SBR- PNL SB2F ANNUNICATOR PANEL YES NO YES NO I *x N Cabinets 2 2 20 -Inatr. &Con oN Panels & IP2-CE-SO-CaOinest CR PNL S-2 F-2 SUPERVISORY CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I Nx N N 2 20 -Instr. & Contol Panels & PNL SC CONDENSOR

& FEEDWATER SUPERVISORY YES NO YES NO N N N N *Cabinets PANEL 2O -Instr & ControN Panels & IP2 soB PNL SCF SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I N N N N *2 Cabinets CCR PNL SC xX 2 i20 -nst. N ConSrl Panels & P2-CE-SF-PNL SF SUPERVISORY CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I N N x 2 CabnesfN CON PNL SF __________________________

2 20 -Instr. & ConUol Panels 9 PNL SFF SUPERVISORY CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I x N N N N 2 Calbinets 2 20 -In~sb. & Contol Panels & P2-CE-SO-NSGO YE Cabinets CON&PNLSO PNL S G SUPERVISORY CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x x x 2 20 -ets. CCRON PN L NS 1P.NSO-2 20 -Onstr. & Control Panls & IP2-COB PNL SGF SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I N N x N 2 Cabinets CCR PNL SG11 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & IP2-C B PNL SH SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I x x x N N Cabines CCR PNL SH 20 -Inst & Control Panels & IP2-CESO-PNL 5.J OCR PANEL YES NO YES NO I N N N N N 2 Cabes CCR PNL SJ ___________PANEL

_YESNOYESNOI___It_

20 -Inst, & Control Panels & IP2S-53C-ONCO CR PNL SL PN L ORPNLYES NO YS NO I N N N N N 2 Cabinets CSR PNL S SL PNL E 20 -Ines. & ontl Pnels & P2-CE-SO-PNL SN SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I Nx N 0 2 OabNesUO OCR PNL SN ___________________

2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & PNL SNF SUPERVISORY PANEL YES NO YES NO I N N x X x 2 Cabinets 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & [P2-CE RACK C5 OCR RACK 0-5 YES NO YES NO B N 2 20 -Cns55. &ConoNPenets

P2-CE- RACK C0 CCR RACK C0. YES NO YES NO I N CaEinNls CCR RACK C5 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & IP2-CB RACK C7 CCR RACK C-T YES NO YES NO I Cabinets CCR RACK C7 x 2 120 -Instr. & Control Panels 9 IP2-CB ce RACK C8 CCR RACK -8YES NO YES. NO I 2 Cabinets CCR RACK C8 20 -InNS. & ContoNl Panels &2 Cabinets RVLIS CAB EPH8 RVUS CABINET YES NO YES NO I x 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21RHRSHX 0021RHRSHX RHR PUMP 21 SEALWATER HX YES NO YES NO N x 2 21 -Tanks and NHee Exchan~gers 2iRHS 0021RHX REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO.21 YES NO YES NO N 2 21 -Tanks and Hem Echanger 21RIST 0021RWST 21 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK YES NO YES NO 0 B X 2 21 -Tnmks and Heat Ehangers 21VCT 0021VCT VOLUME CONTROL TANK NO. 21 YES NO YES NO I x 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22CCHX 0022CCHX CCW HEAT EXCH NO 22 YES NO YES NO I 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exhaangems 22CHPS 0022CHPS CHARGING PUMP NO. 22 SUCTION YES NO YES NO I N STAIL IZERISEPARATOR N YES I NIB Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-16 of 42.1 , A SCREEN,~CURRENT .SSEL .,. E...e... .a :.. .UNIT 8551. EQUIP CLASS, EQIPMEPWr EOJIAPMENTC

~ QIMNT OESCRPQN Ydeg -lhnnat. naa EXPANSION~d TANKen CanO n jwatt IR-: ,<.... .R...taln .....c-cc.cc 2 21 Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22EDJET 0022EDJET DIESEL GENERATOR NO 22 JACKET WATER YES NO YES NO I a x 2 21 Tanks and Hat Eanangera 22EDSAT 0S22EDSAT START AIR TANK 22DG YES NO YES NO I a x n a x 2 21 Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22FODT 0022FODT FUEL OIL DAY TANK NO 22 YES NO YES NO 0 x a a a a 2 21 Tanks and Heat Exhangers 22FOST 0022FOST F 0 STORAGE TANK 22 YES NO YES NO 0 x a x a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22IACA 00221ACA INST AIR COMP 22 AFTERCOOLER YES NO YES NO I a a a a a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22RRHX 0022RHRHX RHR HEAT EXCH NO. 22 YES NO YES NO I T/H S a a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Eanhangem 22RHRSHX 0022RHRSHX 22 RHRP SEAL W ATER HX YES NO YES NO I a *2 21 -Tanks and Heat Enchangers 23CHPS 0023CHPS CHARGING PUMP NO.2 YES NO YES NO I a a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 23EDJET 0023EDJET DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 JACKET WATER YES NO YES NO I a EXTANSING P UARA OR 23 SUCTON 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 23EDSAT 0023EDSAT STAR T AIR TANK 23DG YES NO SEE NO I a a x a a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 23FO DT 0023FO DT FUEL O IL DAY TANK N O .23 YES NO YES NO I a x x x a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 23FOST 0023FOST F.O. STORAGE TANK 23 YES NO YES NO 0 x x x x x 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21BAT 21BAT BORIC ACID TANK YES NO YES NO I a 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21CCHX 21CCHX CCW HEAT EXC H N O 21 YES NO Y ES NO I x 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21CCST 21CCST 21 COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANK YES NO YES YES V-001 I x 2 21 -T anks and Heat Ec hangers 21C HPS 21CHPS CHAN GING PUMPANO. YES NO YES NO SUa 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21EDJET 21EDJET DIESEL GENERATOR 0.N 21 JACKET WATER YES NO YES NO I x x x a x 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Ehchangers 21EDSAT 21EDSAT STARTAIRTANK 21DG YES NO YES NO I a x x x x 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21ELHX 21ELHX EXCESS LETDOW N HX NO. 21 YES NO YES NO a *2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21FODT 21FODT F.O. DAY TANK NO 21 YES NO YES NO I a a a x x 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21FOST 21FOST F.O. STORAGE TANK 21 YES NO YES NO 0 a a a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21NRHX 21NRHX NON REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21 YES NO YES NO I 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers PWST 21PWST PRIM WATER STORAGE TANK YES NO YES NO 0 a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21RRHX 21RHRHX RHR HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 21 YES NO TEN NO I x x 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22EAT 22BAT BORIC ACID TANK YES NO YES NO I B a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers BPORVAU EPORVAU N2 ACCUM FOR PCV456 YES NO YES REMOVE I TtH a 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers CST CST CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK YES NO YES NO 0 a 2 0 -Generc Input Form EUHR-21 EUHR-21 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 00 -G enerc Input Form EUHR-22 EUHR-22 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO 1 2 00 -Genenc Input Form EUHR-23 EUHR-23 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO 2 00 -Generic Input Form EUHR-24 EUHR-24 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 00 -Genenc Input Form EUHR-25 EUHR-25 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 00 -Genenc Input Form EUHR-32 EUHR-32 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES No NO I NO I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page 9-17 of 42 1 UPUT -CURREN SSESCREEN~

SCREEN, SCREEN 3 SCRFRNA -oey m4 UNT SSELECUIPCLASS F ~OUIP6MENU ED XPM ENT~ EQUIPMIENTODESCIR(PIP1 Undergo .man a.teln.IDUU IU RegulartE of H I igh; poeneor he ... Sa .... =Stosrrpucr Ceo. -___3 [PEE Inte ompIdl ____o on Con H* ___1 2 00 Gnanc Input Forn EUHR-33 EUHR-33 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO 2 60 Genenc Input Form EUHR-34 EUHR-34 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO 2 EU Genenc Input Form EUHR-35 EUHR-35 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 DO Generic Input Form EUHR-36 EUHR-36 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 00 -Genenc Input Form EUHR-37 EUHR-37 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATER YES NO NO NO I 2 00 -Generic Input Form 112-21 HYDROGEN SUPPLY MANIFOLD #21 YES NO NO YES I 2 EU -Genenc InputForm N2-XX NITROGEN SUPPLY PACKAGE YES NO NO YES I 2 05 -Horizontal Pumps SPBP PSS-SBP R.C. SAMPLE BOOSTER PUMP YES NO NO REMOVE I B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 261A 0261A 21 RCP SEAL WATER RET VALVE YES NO NO NO I T _H B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 261B 02618 22 RCP SEAL WATER RET VALVE YES NO NO NO I TH B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 261C 0261C 23 RCP SEAL WATER RET VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluod-Operated Valves 261D 02610D 24 RCP SEAL WATER RET VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fiud-Operated Valves 553A 0553A STAND PIPE MAKE-UP VALVE RCP 21 YES NO NO NO I TH B 2 07 -Fluid-Operted Valves 553B 0553B STAND PIPE MAKE-UP VALVE RCP 22 YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Openred Valves 553C 0553C STAND PIPE MAKE-UP VALVE RCP 23 YES NO NO NO I TH B 2 07 -FIld-Operated Valves 553D 05530 STAND PIPE MAKE-UP VALVE RCP 24 YES NO NO NO I TMH a 2 07 Flud-Operated Valves 763A 0783A 21 RCP RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 F- ud-Operated Valves 783B 0783B 22 RCP RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I TH B 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves 783C 0783C 23 RCP RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Val-es 763D 07631 24 RCP RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 U7 -Fluid-Operated Valves 819A 0819A INLET RHR HX 22 RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I TfH B 2 07 .Flued-Operated Valves 819B 08195 INLET RHR HX 21 RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H B 2 07 -Flud-Opernted Valves 821H 0821H RETURN FROM RV SUPRTS RLF VALVE YES NO NO YES I B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 1640 1649 N2 SUPPLY HEADER RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 1 2 07 -Fluid-Operlted Valves 1671 1671 H2 HEADER RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 1836 1836 RHR PURIFICATION LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 U7 -Fluid-Operated Valves 218 218 SEAL WTR RETURN RLF VALVE TO PRT YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -Flid-Operated Valves 231 231 21 CHARGE PMP RLF VALVE TO VCT YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -lod-Operated Valves 234 234 22 CHARGE PMP RLF VALVE TO VCT YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves 237 237 23 CHARGE PMP RLF VALVE TO VCT YES NO NO YES I B 2 07 -Flud-Operated Valves 246-VLV 246 RCP SEAL NO.1 BYPASS VALVE TO VCT YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -Fuid-Operated Valves 263 263 21 NON-REGEN HX RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 .Fluid-Operated Valves 264 264 VCT RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves 265 265 VCT GAS ANALYZER SAMPLE VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 57 -Fluid-Operated Valves 268 266 VCT VENT ISO VALVE YES NO NO NO I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-18 of 42 SR EN SCREEN 2 SCREENS' SCREEN 4 Ple Safety 1Functions UNIT SEEL EQUIP CLASS EQUIPMENT 4 EQUIPMIENT-4 .4.EQUIPMENdTDESCRIPTION

'~Urtiorg., E-1-17lrak-

.11 ID , 4' t .> Siic? Regular ..t- -e of Replaced WIfE fesidd Rfotlun Pe-a1fsefe

*Su4'~nigri th 5 1/44 Cohomor -uSsafety 4" ,ft TemrpI B-ataed 'Conrolet 4 C Ha1 Cnwm Ipereooes, '. nriedaey syoferRemva 2 07 -Flu~dperated Valves 4058 4058 INLET TO VCT RELIEF VALVE YES NO 50 YES I 2 07 -Flud-Operated Valus AI05 4105 PCV-456 N2 SUPPLY RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES 2 07 Fluid-Operated Values 4105 4106 PCV-456C N2 SUPPLY RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fuid-Operatd Values 5i-VLV 5SI PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK VENT VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valus 523 523 PRT DRAIN VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 5417 5417 R.C. BOOSTER PUMP DISCH RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO REMOVE T IREMOVE I r 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 5418 5418 R.C. BOOSTER PUMP SUCTION RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO D I Till 2 07 Fluid-Operated Values 541 REACTOR VESSEL FLANGE LEAK-OFF CTRL YES NO NO NO I TIH VALVE 2 07 -Fluid-Operatd Values 560 560 PRIMARY WATER MAKE-UP TO PRT YES NO NO YES I TMN 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 782 702 CCW RETURN FROM RCPs RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I T/H 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 792 792 EXCESS LETROWN HO RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I TMH 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 802 802 SPENT FUEL FIT HX RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YES I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 807 80 SEAL WATER HE RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 812 812 NON-REG HX RETURN RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values 835 835 SURGE TANK RELIEF YES NO NO NO I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values SF5-AU SF35-A 22 A NFWP BRG COOLING WATER RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07 -Fuid-perated Values CC-56 CC-I6 CC INLET TO APTERCOOLER 21 RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valus CC-56-I CC-56-I CC INLET TO AFTERCOOLER 22 RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values CT-O5 CT-O5 APP 21 SUCTION LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07U Fluid-Operated Valves CT-35-S CT-35-I AFP 22 SUCTION LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Vales CT-35-2 CT-35-2 AFP 23 SUCTION LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values OF-3O OF-3O EAT TANK NORM FILL RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO I I 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values DF-14 OF-1d DAY TANK EMERGENCY FILL RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NOY 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values OF-14 DF- 21 POST FUEL LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values OF-4-1 DF-4-I 22 FOST FUEL UNE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values DF-4-2 DF-4-2 20 FOST FUEL LINE RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 07 -FPlid-Operated Values HCV--23 HCV-13 RI-IN PURF LINE CONTROL VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 UT -Fluid-Operated Values HCV-3003 HCV-1303 SEAL WTR RET FLT BYPASS VALVE YES NO NO NO B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values LCV-312A LCV-132A MAKE-UP TO VCT 0-WAY VALVE YES NO NO NO B 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values MS-52 MS-52 AFWP 22 STEAM SUPPLY SAFETY RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO NO H2 SUPPLY TO VCT SOUTH BANK PRESS CTRL YES NO NO NO 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values PCV-1t41 PCV-i541 VALVE H2 SUPPLY TO VCT NORTH BANK PRESS CTRL YES NO NO NO 2 07 -FlUid-Operated Values PCV-11042 PCV-1042 VALVE 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values PCV-1043 PCV-1043 NO SUPPLY TO VCT PRESS CTRL VALVE YES NO .0 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Values PCV-1044 PCV-1044 N2 SUPPLY TO VCT PRESS CTRL VALVE YES No NO NO Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-19 of 42...... ., ,. ..,: :.f ... " .SCREEN i:.i , "..... .2' ~~~~ ~SCRE CRET u-sa- <SCR EEN 2 SCRIEEN3 SCREEN4 F s~ in. Safreyegls UNIT SEEL EQUIP CLASS EQUIPMEN EQUIPMENT .EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION

< ndeeg 'Evoe? 1-.I1 0 IDbY 0~7., Regular, 'eeaee Hg ecal naey Hesary onan n__________-

-< -Corfiguiratart n5$-ey e TemO -warale C1--ie C,"releel 2 57 -Fluid-Opeated Valves PCV-113A PCV-1113A H2 SUPPLY TO VCT REG VALVE YES NO NO YEST 2 57 Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-114 PCV-11 14 N2 SUPPLY TO VCT REO VALVE YES NO NO YES 2 07 Fluid-Operated Valves PCV-1284 PCV-1284 RELIEF VALVE N2 BACKUP TO AFaR CONTROL YES NO NO NO 2 07 Fiuid-Operated Valves SWN I WN-42-1 FCU-21 SW INLET RELIEF VALUE YES NO NO YESI H 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Vaives SWN.42-2 SWN-.42-2 FCU-22 SW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YESI H 2 07 -Fluid-Opeurated Values SWN-42-3 SWN-42-3 FCU-23 SW INLET RELIEF VALUE YES NO NO YESI H 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Vaives SWVN42-4 SWN-42-4 FCUJ-24 SW INLET RELIEF VALUE YES NO NO YES_2 07 -Fliud-Operated Valves SWN-42-9 SWN-42-S FCU-25 SW INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YESI H 2 07 -Fliud-Operated Velves SWN-63 SWN-83 00-22 SW & LO CLRS CaR INLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YESI 2 87 -Fluid-Operated Valves SWVN-63-1 EaRN-RU-i

_ DG-23 .1W & LO CLRS OW INLET RELIEF VALUE YES NO NO YESI 2 07 -Fluid-Operatd Values SWN-63-2 SWN-63-2 DG-21 JW E LO CLRS Cue INLET RELIEF VALUE YES NO NO YESI 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves SWN-Bi SVVN-81 CCW HE 22 SW OUTLET RELIEF VALUE YES NO NO YESI 2 07 -Fluid-Operat ed Valves SVVN-8l-1 tSWVN-B81 -t 1 CW i-I 21 OWN OUTLET RELIEF VALVE YES NO NO YESI 2 07 Fluid-Operated Values SWN-86 SWN-86 21 IA COOLER OW INLET RELIEF VALUE YES NO NO YES 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves SOWN-8B-I SWN-86-i 22 IA COOLER SW INLET RELIEF VALUE YES NO NO YESI 2 07 -Fluid-Operated Valves TCV-149 TCV-14B NON-REOE5 HE FLOW OUTLET 3-WAY YES NO NO NOI 2 011A -Marar-Operated Valves 95SA-V9.V 0955A BORON SAMPLE LINE ISO VALVE YES NO NO NO I 8 2 08A -Mater-Operatd Valves BSSB-VLV 09958 BORON SAMPLE LINE ISO VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 0BA -Murur-Operatad Values RS8E-VLV 09560 BORON SAMPLE LINE ISO VALVE YES NO NO N0 I B 2 01W -Murur-Operated Valves R9BF-VEV 09580 BORON SAMPLE LINE ISO VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 011A -Meter-Operated Values 227 227 HCV-142 BYPASS CH FLOW TO RCS VALVE YES NO NO NO I B 2 011A -Mylar-Operated Values 4394 4394 FLUSH WATER TO RCS SAMPLER OX TRL VALVE YES NO NO NO 2 011A -Muter-Operated Values 4395 4395 FLUSH WATER TO RCS SAMPLE HA CTRL VALUE YES NO NO NO 2 0RA -Meter-Operated Values 4398 4396 R.C. SAMPLE BOOSTER PUMP INLET ISO VALUE YES NO NO RIE~u0VE I TV-i B 2 08A -Mater-Operated Values 4397 4397 B.C. SAMPLE BOOSTER PUMP OUTLET ISO VALUE YES NO NO RECOSES I TiH B 2 08A4- Meter-Operated Valves SWN-617 SWN-617 STRAINER BACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 011W -Mylar-Operated Values SVVN-618 OWN-At8 STRAINER BACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 01W -Myla,-Operat.d Values SWN-6th SWN-619 STRAINER BACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES 'H 2 011W -Muter-Operated Values SWN-620 SWN-620 STRAINER BACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 08A -Merer-Operated Values SWN-821 OWN-621 _ STRAINER B1ACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 08A -Meter-Operated Values OWN-82 OWN-Rn STRAINER B3ACKWASH ISO VALVE YES NO NO YES I H 2 088 -Sulerrud-Operated Values SOV-2t9 SOV-2r5 21S INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID I YES NO NO NO0 2 088 -Sulerrud-Operared Values SOV-2R8 SOLIENOID VALVE YES NO NO YESI 2 0l8 -Sldeeid-Operated ValLes SOV-1303 SOV-3A'3 SOLENOIO VALVE YES NO NO YES 2 088 -Suoenoid-Operated Valves SOV-310 SOV-3t0 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO NO NO Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037

.Rev. 0 Page B-20 of 42 CREEN SCREENS SCREENREP emoa n SJEL EQUIP CLASS 22CPREF E0UPC ENT EQUIPENT' DESCRIPTION RI 2N M-NOoo I ES n T/2 0-Fns2RD 003RF CNRLRDRVEVNFA23YS NsOter* !Oer YES .e IaTlrltH ys To? Cee~e~itro tired ty SHIP) So ce-wtru Conra'uelnv-Cnro -Rea to n S inc C Rý3U.,2. 1-1 ____ Replace IFEE 11 " ____1111-2 09 P ans 22CRDF S022CRDF CONTROL ROD DRIVE VENT FAN 22 E O N E I T/HI P 9-Fn S FIRESTAT FOR PAN 22 YES NO NO YESI 2 14 -Disslbution Panels WatT WV7 FUSE 605 21 YES NO NO NOI 2 14 -Orsontuson Panels WV8 WS FUSE 8 22 YES NO NO NOH d 2 18 -Inasnrnenrs on Racks ASS 222TR LIGHTINGS FRI #223 TRANSFORMER YES NO NO YESI 2 19 -Temparature Sensors EUI-iC EU-IC1 EDO ALSO THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YESI 2 19 -TemperatnreSensors EUO-t1 EuI-l1 EDN2 SLG THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES 2 19 -Temperatuoe Sensors EUO-12 ELS-12 EDO ALSO THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES 2 19 -Teorperature Sensors EU-13 EUal-i3 EDO ALSO THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES N 2 19 -Tenmperature Sensors EO-rR EU-14 ED R DLSO THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES I T/H 2 19 -FTemperatRre Sensors EL-ISO EU-t ED R DLD V THERMOSTAT YES NO NO NO I 2 19 -Te2perature Sensors EUN-19 E-I9 ED R BLDG THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES I 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TC-6995 1S)28 TC-8995 THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES 1 2 19 -Temperoture Sensors TE-1253-t TE-12C3-1 FAN SOIL UNIT 21 T.D. YES NO NO NO 2 19 -Temperatre Sensors TE-1203-2 TE-1253-2 PAN COIL B NlY 22 TE. YES NO NO NO 2 189 -Temperotue Sensors TE-1253-3 TE-t223-3 PAN COIL CR1123 T.E. YES NO NO NOY 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-1203-4 TE-1203-4 PAN COIL UNIT 24 T.E YES NO NO NOY 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-1213-5 TE-12C3-5 FAN COIL UNIT 25 YE. YES NO NO NOY 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE--12 E-122 EXCESS LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NOY 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-123 TE-12 CHG LOW TORCSTEMPELEMENT YES NO NO NO Y 8 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-127 TE-127 CHG FLOW TORCSTEMPELEMENT YES NO NO so I B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-13C TE-135 NON REGHB OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I A 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-453 TE-453 PRESSURIZER LIBUID SPACE TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO YES I 13) B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-S5S TE-954 PRESCRIZER STEAM SPACE TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I VIA B 2 19 Temperature Sensors TE-411 TE-471 PRT TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO YES I T/- B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-123-2R HX -2 A STEMP INLET TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I T/l B 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-139 TE-039 RHR HC OUTLET TEMP ELEMENT YES NO NO NO I TM A 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-1195 TE-7197 THERMOSTAT 2YES NO NO NO 1 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-7126 TE-1718 THERMOSTAT YES NO NO NO I 2 19 -Temperature Sensors TE-7199 TE-1799 THERMOSTAT YES NO NO NO B Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-21 of 42 47CRRIT AgSL\4T'CRrEN2 SCREENS3SRE ieSft -~T<UNIT 4.SSES EQUIP EQ'Pe ENT EQU PMENT EC, IPME.NT DESCRIPTION Unde rgo Mantas at :"4 < ,4u-,, ' D...Regular les o? at ROIUWST IPEEE -d sIdesd c-c levetol Coflga ..tDa that ySa nt Boruasd Co.tent Con.Re.2 19 Teerpa..t.re Sensors TE-7220 THERMOSTAT YES NO NO YES 2 20 Inst & Contol Panels & CRPI CTRL ROD CLUSTER POS IND SYSTEM YES NO NO NO Cabines 2 18 Instruments on Racks EDO S EDDS EDO #21 CONTROL CIRCUIT TRANSFORMER 18____ -Inst__menon Racks EDD-5 EDD5 SWITCH YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 Instruments on Racks EDD-6 EDD6 EDG #22 CONTROL CIRCUIT TRANSFORMER YES NO Note I NO I SWITCH 2 18 -Insonnents an Racks EDD-7 EDD7 EDG #23 CONTROL CIRCUIT TRANSFORMER YES NO Nota NO SWITCH 2 18 -insurcmnns on Rocks EDMi EDMI SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Note I NO 18- _sue__onRa_

EM1 ED1 SWITCH 2 18 -Insruments on Racks EDM2 EDM2 SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Note I NO I SWITCH 2 18 -Instruments on Racks EDM3 EDM3 SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YS N oeI N SWITCH YS N oe1 N 2 -SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES N0 Natal1 NO 2 18 -Insbuments on Racks EDM4 EDM4 SWITCH 2 18 -Instruments on Racks EDM5 EDM5 SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Note I NO I SWITCH 2 18 Instruments on Raks EDM6 EDM6 SERVICE WATER PUMP STRAINER DISCONNECT YES NO Nota l NO SWITCH 2 18 -Instuments on Racks FC-6830-S FC-6830-S FLOW SWITCH YES NO Note a YES I 2 18 -Instuments on Racks FC-7145-1S FC-7145-1S FLOW SWITCH YES NO Note l NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FC-7145-2S FC-7145-2S FLOW SWITCH YES NO Note a NO I 2 18 -Instrsments on Racks FIC-5919 FIC-5919 YES NO Notal NO I 2 18 -Instruments an Racks FIT-111 FIT-I l FLOW INDICATOR TRANSMITTER YES NO Note a NO I 2 18 -Insaruments on Racks FIT-156A FIT-156A RCP 24 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note a YES I T/H B 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FIT-156B FIT-1568 RCP 24 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note a YES I TVH B 2 18 *Instruments on Racks FIT-157A FIT-157A RCP 23 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note l YES I T/H B 2 18 -Insouments on Racks FIT-157B FIT-157B RCP 23 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I T/H a 2 18 -Istsuentns on Racks FIT-15A FIT-15UA RCP 22 SEAL LEAXOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Not I YES I T/H B 2 18 -InstrueNs

-Racks FIT-158B FIT-1588 RCP 22 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Notel YES I T/H B 2 18 -Instrnments on Racks FIT-159A FIT-159A RCP 21 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TIH B 2 18 -Instusments an Rocks FIT-159B FIT-159B RCP 21 SEAL LEAKOFF FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TIH B 2 18 -Instumentn on Racks FM-IlA FM-lilA UP SIGNAL TRANSDUCER YES NO Note a NO 2 18 -Insruments on Racks FT-12OO FT-1200 AFW TO SG 21 FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Nate it YES 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FT-1201 FT-1201 AFW TO SG 22 FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Insluments on Racks FT-1202 FT-1202 AFW TO SG 23 FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Insoounents an Racks F1-1203 P1-1203 AFW TO SG 24 FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -instruments on Racks FT-128 FT-128 CHG FLOW TO REGEN HX TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I B 2 18 -Instuments an Racks T.134 FT-134 NON REGEN HX OUTLET LETDOWN FLOW YES NO Note I YES I B TRANSMITTER 2 18 -EInstruents on Racks FT-414 FT-414 RX COOLANT LOOP 1 FLOW TRANSMITTER CH I YES NO Note a YES I TIH 8 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-4IS F-15 RXCOOLANTLOOPIFLOWTRANSMITTERCHII YES NO Natal YES I T/- 8 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-22 of 42..... ..CREEN I SCREEN3I " .SC REFN4 ' ' F-;:;y .-"........ ....... .... 44 'SCREEN 44 "4,' 3/4 'SREC "" ' 47: '

'4.'t UNIT SE aEQUIP CLASS ' 4EQUIPMENT EOULPMET EQUIPMENTDESCRIPTION d47' ' r o Erw9... .........4',DOS.!D D ' C .R ' RST AgLry PTR N M T E IY EwSy N O otOtYO OIT/2 18 -Icnstmonts on Rocks FT-42EA FT-4N9A SG 21 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I T/'2 18 Instruments on Racks FT-429I FT429B SG 21 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Not. I YES I T/I 2 18 Instccments on Racks FT-424 FT424 RX COOLANT LOOP 2 FLOW TRANSMITTER CH I YES NO NoWe YES I T/Hu 2 18 Instrumenes on Rocks FT-425 FT-CS RX COOLANT LOOP 2 FLOW TRANSMITTER CH II YES NO Nowl YES I T/H B 2 18 I-nstrments on Rocks FT'429A FT-429A SG 22 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TIH 2 18 Instruments on Racks FT-429B FT-423B SG 22 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TRI 2 18 *Instrments on Rcks FT-44H FT'434 RX COOLANT LOOP 3 FLOW TRANSMITTER CH I YES NO Nowl YES I TIH 8 2 18 -Ins~coenas on Racks FT-435 FT-435 RX COOLANT LOOP 3 FLOW TRANSMITTER CIA YES NO Nowl YES I T1H B 2 18 -Instoments on Rocks FT-439A FT-449A S3 23 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Nola I YES I I/H 2 18 -Insourments on Rocks FT-439B FT-4398 SG 23 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TII 2 18 -Insolments on Rocks FT-444 FT4944 N COOLANT LOOP H FLOW TRANSMITTER OH I YES NO Nol I YES I TIH 2 18 -Inooncents on Racks FT-E4T FT-45 NT COOLANT LOOP 4 FLOW TRANSMITTER OH 1I YES NO Nowl YES I TIH a 2 18 -Instruments on Rocks FT-44AA FT-440A SG024 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I T/H 2 18 -IsoHeRn on Roks FT-4ugE fT-HARE 3024 STEAM FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Nowl YES I TIH 2 18 -Instlmento on Racks FT-946A I FT-94IA YES NO Cowl NO 2 18 'Inos"..nnts on Rocý F'S-601 FT'601 CC WAT ER FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO Cowl YESI 2 18 -Instrurnoct on Rocks P'S'6A0 FT'NA0 RHO FLOW TRANSMITTER YES NO CowlI NO I TIM B 2 18 'Instuments on Racks FT-946A FT-946A RHR TO RCS 24 COLD LEG FLOW TRANSMITTER, YES NO Cowl NO I TIM 8 LOOP4 YE3O N ~ N I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks FT-946B FT-46C RMR TO RCS 23 COLD LEG FLOW TRANSMITTER.

YES NO Nowl NO I TIH B LOOP 2 2 18 -InseumentsonRacks FT-946C FT-9460 RHR TO RCS 22 COLD LEG FLOW TRANSMITTER.

YES NO Note w NO I T/I 8 2 1 onLOOP 1 2 18 -Instruments on Rocks LC-112D LC-112D LEVEL CONTROLLER YES NO Nowl NO I TIE 2 18 -ITnstirments on Rocks LT-112 LT-112 VCT LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Notre NO I B 2 18 -InonJ ments on Rocks LT-1 128 LT-1 128 COND STORAGE TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Ino.crmentsonRacks LT-112EA LT-1128A COND STORAGE TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note w NO I 2 18 -Insoumenlo on Racks LT-1311 LT-1311 RNT ESSEL LEVEL TRANSMITTER NARROW RANGEYE NO NtI YEI / B 2 18 lnsoments on Rocks LT-1312 LT-1312 RX VESSEL LEVEL TRANSMITTER WIDE RANGE YES NO Note w YES I TIM B 2 18 -Insoiuments on Rocks LT-417A LT-417A SG 21 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note l NO I T/H 2 18 -Instormens on Rocks LT-417D LT-417D SG 21 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Now I YES I TIE 2 18 -Instruments on Racks LT'427A LT-427A SG 22 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Notw I NO I T/H 2 18 -Insoments on Racks LT-427D LT-427D SG 22 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Nowl YES I T/H 2 18 -lInsnorents on Racks LT-437A LTA37A SG 23 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Nowl NO I T/H 2 18 -Instments on Racks LT-437D LT-437D SG 23 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note w YES I TIH 2 18 -Innurnenl on Roks LT447A LT-447A SG 24 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Cow I NO I TIH Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-23 of 42~-SCREEN SCREEN 2 SCREENS i $CREEN4 UNIT SSEL EQUIPCLASS EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT-OAPENTCDESCRIPýTION

--1-m-.-to ID: .Rgla I ... t... .... on ", -E :,f ... .P,, e.su. H- ... ... ..o-- T-aio .

ty .*essr ta etl ' ..d .. .......a IDV ~ 7 S~smc? Refgular-tK Re5ae FREE Out, Tetp aa~ onecawl CaRentr C."R_______ ~Inspectoost

!Laoýns IF)FiO4t p 2 1S Inustumentsonar Racks 4 LT-4470 LT 4470 3024 LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Retact YES I I T/ll 2 18 Inocroe-ts on Racks LT-459 LT-459 PRESSURIZER LEVEL TRANSMITTER CH I YES No Note I NO I T/H 2 18 Instruments an Racks LT-460 LT-A6S PRESSURIZER LEVEL TRANSMITTER CH 11 YES NO Note I NO I T/H 2 8 In ostrments on Racks11-470 LT-470 PRY LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I TIN 2 18 -Instrumentsan Racks LT-S7S1 LT-5751 RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO 0 2 18IAnstruments on Racks LT-920 LT-N20 RINET LEVEL TRANSMITTER YES No Nate I NO 0 2 15 Instruentscl an Racks PCV-473 PCV-473 N2 SUPPLY TO PRY YES NO Nate I YESI 2 iN -Instrumentsoan Racks PM-1 134 PM4-1134 PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO RatedI YESI 2 iR -Instruments cc Racks PM-112S PM-ii35 PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO NatelI YESI 2 18 -Instruments an Racks P14-1136 PM4-1136 PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Nalte I YESI 2 18 -instrumnets an Racks PM4-1137 PM4-1137 PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO NoitetI NO 2 18 -IncstrmentscaRacks PW4135 PM-135 UP PRESSURE CONVERTER YES NO Ntet NO 2 It Instrcments on Racks PM4-05A PM-405A PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I YES 2 1t Instruments an Racks P14-4058 PM-405B PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Noat I NOI 2 1R Instcruents on Racks PM-405C PM-405C PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Nate I NOI 2 18 -Instrumrents on Racks PM4405D PM4-405D PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Sate I NOI 2 18 -Instrumrents on Racks PM-4cRE PM-406E PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES No Nate I NOI 2 18 -Instcuments on Racks PM-406F PM-bET PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Nate I NO 2 18 -Icoaccenic an Racks PM4-4806 PM-406G PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Nate I YES 2 18 -Instrum~ents on Racks PM4406H PM4-406H PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Nate I NOI 2 18 -Instrcments on Racks PNL A1 STEAM DUMP VALVE LOCAL PANEL #1 YES NO Nate I NOI 2 18 -Instrumentsan Racks PNLID2 STEAM DUMP VALV ELOCAL PANEL #2 YES NO Note I NOI 2 18 -Instsruents on Racks LP-223 PNL 0223 UIGHTING PANEL YES NO Nate I YESI 2 I8S Instrumeants an Racks PRV-l 139-1 PRY-I 139-1 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES NO Nat. I NOI 2 18 -Instrments on Racks PRV-1 139-2 PRV-1 139-2 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES NO NotedI YESI 2 It -InstrumentsonRacks PRV-1 139-3 PRV-il139-3 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES No NotedI YES 1 2 18 -Instrument onRacks PRV-113N-4 P8V-1139-4 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES NO Roated NOI 2 18 -Instruments an Racks PRV-113N-5 PRY-iON3-5 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE YES NO RatedI NOI 2 18 -Icstrumants cc Racks PRV-5N24 PRV-5924 PRESS 800 TO CCR PAN1EL YES NO Note I NOI 2 18 -Instruments an Racks PT-iiA8 PT-1144 STAT ION, AIR NUCL SERVICE PRESS YEIONaeI N TRANSMITTER YS N oeI N 2 18 -EInstruments onRocks PT-1190 PT-Il190 SWP 21-23 015CR NOR (LINE 409) PRESS YES NO Nate I NOI TRANSMITTER TO PI-I1iGRR 2 IR -1.s raeneascRacks PT-tt1l PT1-lI9 SVC WATER NUCLNHEADER PRESSYTRANSMITTER YES NO RatedI NOI 2 18 -Instrumeents an Racks PT-1182 PT-1192 IACC WATER PRESS TRANISMITTER YES NO Ntt NO 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-1265 PT-1260 AFW 21 DISCRARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Nate I YES Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-24 of 42 A.:,,, .., .:* ... ...+.:, .....I K .-. .,ie ley: oo.SCREEN N SCREN 3. F, SfeyFuKl CURtRENET ass. -----U 44 SIELESEUIP CLASS EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT DECITO Envl-- -I.OS .D.IP C .U.. ....mI.. + c,, E,.t.ro .....*~~ A Coofigortios.

thR~el -S." EEE Tamp: K Boxated cook c .ours 2 18 -Instrments on Racks PT-1261 PT-1261 AFW 22 DISCHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 Instruments on Racks PT-1262 PT-1262 AFW 23 DISCHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Now I YES I 18 Instrmenson Racks PT-135 PT-135 NON REGEN HX OUTLET LETDOWN PRESS YES NO Now I NO 2 8-tsmmns nRck T15 T15 TRANSMITTER YS N o,1 N 2 18 Instruments on Racks PT-139 PT-139 VCT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO 2 18 -Instuments on Racks PT-142 PT-142 CHG PP DISCHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 Instruments on Rocks PT-402 PT-402 LOOP 21 HOT LEG PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TIH B 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-403 PT-403 LOOP 24 HOT LEG PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I TIH 8 2 1R -Instruments an Rocks PT-406A PT-406A 21 AFW PP DISCHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Mot. I NO 2 18 -Instuments on Racks PT-406 PT-406a8 22 AFW PP DISCHARGE PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note NO 2 18 -Instruments on Rocks PT-413 PT-413 LOOP 21 HOT LEG PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO 2 18 -Instruments on Rocks PT-419A PT-419A SG 21 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO 2 18 -Instuments on Racks PT-419B PT-419B SO 21 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Rocks PT-419C PT-419C SG 21 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instuments on Rocks PT-429A PT-429A SO 22 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO 1 2 18 -Instruments on Rocks PT-429B PT-429B SG 22 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note w NO I 2 18 -Inscrments on Racks PT-429C PT-429C SG 22 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-433 PT-433 LOOP 23 HOT LEG PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-439A PT-439A SG 23 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO 1 2 18 -hostruments on Racks PT-439B PT-439B SO 23 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PTA439C PT-439C SG 23 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Notw I NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-443 PT-443 LOOP 24 HOT LEG PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO 1 2 18 -Instuments on Racks PT-449A PT-449A SO 24 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Inslnuments on Racks PT-449B PT-4498 SG 24 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instruments on Rocks PT-449C PT-449C SO 24 STEAM PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO 2 18 -Instuments on Rocks PT-455 PT-A55 PRESSURIZER PRESSURE CH I TRANSMITTER YES NO Note f NO I T/I 2 18 -instruments on Rocks PT-456 PT-456 PRESSURIZER PRESSURE CH II TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I T/H 2 18 -Instuments on Racks PT-457 PT-457 PRESSURIZER PRESSURE CH III TRANSMITTER YES NO Note 1 NO I T/H 2 18 -Instuments on Racks PT-472 PT-472 PRT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO I 2 18 -Instuments on Racks PT-474 PT-474 PRESSURIZER PRESSURE CH IV TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-5993 PT-5993 RHR PUMP DISCH PRESS TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I NO 2 18 -instcuments on Rocks PT-948A PT-948A CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instsuments on Racks PT-948B PT-948B CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO NoteS YES 2 18 -Instrments on Racks PT-948C PT-8C CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instruments on Racks PT-949A PT-SARA CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I 2 18 -Instmrments on Racks PT-R49B PT-949R CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES NO Note I YES I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-25 of 42<SRR W t E I4REEN~ SCREEN 2 SCREEN 0 -, ' SCREEN 4 Pl- ne~fty Fo andos UNIT 5521. EQUIP CLASS EQUIPMANT EENT N --*.EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION

,~d- X , -~ K *, $to~unua lean eon H~nitghoRat Poesnote -ltoneett.. ..n. q.f., ea t o f TR 1, C C on ,nCetgrton tileS6 Safety Refoed WE "I'l"Ts 1 1-edei Cttenn 2 10 Instruments on Racks PT-S4SC PT-949C CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRANSMITTER YES No Note I YES 2 1R1 InstrnmentsoanRackns SC-141A SC-141A CHARGE PIP SPEED CONTROL-LOCAL YES SO NotetI NOI 2 t -Isnstruentson Racks SC-14IO SC-141B CHARGE PP SPEED CONTROL-LOCAL YES NO NOWaI NO1 2 tO Insrument on Racks SC-14lC SC-141C CHARGE PP SPEED CONTROL-LOCAL YES NO Note I NO1 2 20 -lIsS & ContolI Panels & P1-1200 I110 APSO TO SG021 FLOW INDICATOR YES No Noew I NOI Cabinets 2 Cabi lnets F a~dPnl I-12S1 FF-12011 AFW TO 30 22 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NOI 2 20 -lonsS. &ControlPanelsE

& PFI1202 FI-t202 AFWV TO SIG 23 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO NotelI NOI Cab inets 2 20 -losS. & Cootrni Panels & FI-1203 P1-1203 AFWV TO SG024 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NOI Cabinets 2 20 -IosO.O&ContonlPanelsE

& P1-1205 Fk-128B CHGPFLOW TO REGEN HXINDICATOR YES NO Note 11 NOI Cabinets Ca2 -inest.&CnrlPnl&

F-14 F13 NON REGEN 015 OUTLET LETDOWN FLOW YES NO Note I NOI 2 20 -loNE. & Coonsol Panels & 114 P13 NIAO 20abloneAConit aels Fl-AlA F1-414 AX COOLANT LOO P I FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/O 2 Can-inestr&CnrlPnl 2 20 -lossr. & Coontol Panels & FI-424 F1-424 AX COOLAN4T LOOP 1 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/ll 2 Cabinets 2 120 -losS. & Contns' Panels & FF0424 P1-425 AX COOLANT LOOP 2 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TA-I Cabinefts 2 20 -loonr. & Coons'l Panels & F1-424 F14142 AX COOLANT LOOP 2 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIll 2 20 -lonss. & Connol Panels & P1-434 FI-435 RO COOLANT LOOP 3 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note i NO I TOO Caninets 2 20 -lossr. & Coontol Panels & P1-430 FI-A30 AX COOLANT LOOP 3 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Tf-O Caninets 2 20 -loss. & Control Panels & FF-444 F1-444 AX COOLANT LOOP 4 FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Tt-I Caninets 2 20 -lonst. & Coontol Panels & F-6401 F-601 AX COOANTE LOPR FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T-Caninets Caninets 2 20 -loss. & Control Panels & FI-640 FI-640 RHR FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIH 2 20 -loss. & Coontol Panels & P1-94&A F1-940A RHR TO RCS 24 COLD LEG FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIN Caninels 2 20 -loss. & Cootrol Panels & F1-9468 FF59468 RHR TO RCS 23 COLD LEO FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/ll Cabinets 2 20 -non. & Coontol Panels & PI-SAAC F1-946C RHO TO RCS 22 COWD LEG FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note i NO I TO-I Caninets 2 20 -lossr. & Coons'l Panels & FI-9AAD P1-WA6D RHR TO RCS 21 COWD LEG FLOW INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TAO Caninets 2 120 -loss. &AConnrol Panelso PlFC-Ill PlC- Ill DEtaIN. WATER FLOW ING. CONTROL ITEM I110 YES NO NotelI NOI CaninetsI 2 20 -lonin. &AControl PanelsE& FR-156 FR-ISO RCP 230&24 SEAL LEAIIOFF FLOW YES NO NOWal nEenoES I TIH Canines, 2 20 -loon 8 Coons'l Panels & F8-157 FR-157 RCP 23 &24 SEAL SEALOFP FLOW YES NO Note I REM.OVED I T/H Canie 2 20 -lossr. & Coons'l Panels & PR-t58 FR-159A RCP 210&22 SEAL LEAIOOFP PLOW YES NO Note I REMOVED I TIP Caninets 2 20 -loons. &Coontol Panels & PR-l5S PA-lOSS RCP 21 &22 SEAL LEAKOFF PLOW YES NO NetelI ,,EoOVE0 I TIN-Caninets 2 20 -lonss. &Control Panels & LU-112 LI-112 OCT LEVEL INDICATOR YES No Not.el NO I B CosinetsII I 2 20 -Inor. & ContonlPanelsO&

U-1128 LJ-1128 CORD STORAGE TANK LEVEL INDICATOR YES I No NotetI NOI CabinotsI III Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-26 of 42 SCR N SCREEN.2.

SCREEN*3.., SCROONA ,SoeyPnea

'.4........ ....,* '. .SCREEN........

....r *..... ', , .... .. '. ,ie ," -: " ,. CURRENT.1

.' .... ." _ ..Wý SLQICLASS EOIUIP#ENfl-EQUIPMENT

'YEQLAPMENTODESCRIPn I'. ~urdengeX eo, Enloemt~-D ID , soi? egular"' 'Dotoe'oyRE Enoi tjh ~ ~ ~ ~ y IN~e itteil E.UIP.. .Sa.. .. ,:.

o+ T.ein..p .notated.+

Cenol' Coef r.,. .. a. ...t.ee. ? .e .20 Inbst RCnntol PenelsR LI-S12NA LI-1128A COND STORAGE TANK LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note1I NO 20 -Inst. & Cont~ol pantis &b LI -417A LI-41TA SO 22 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I YES I TIH S20 -Inst. S Contol Panels & L-2 4-427D 3022 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note G NO I TIl 2 20 -Insr. & Con.tol Panels & LI427A L-407A 8022 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I YES I TIH 20 -Inst. & Contol Panelsi&sLI-427D 11-427D SG 22 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIN 2 20 -Ins. & Control Panels & LI-417A LI-417A SG 24 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note t YES I Til Cabinets C0 D I Tle 2 20 -Insts. &Contol Panels & LI-4N7D L1-417D SG 2S LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I TIH 2 20 -lenst. & Con~ol Panels & 11-447A U1470 PRT2 LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note t NOS I Till Cabtinets 2 20 -Inst. & Contol Panels & A27A LU-427 SG 2E LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note t NO T Cabinets YES I 20 -Inst. N Contol PanelsUa&eLO-l45 LI-459 SVESSGEL LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/H B 2 20 -Inst, & Conrol Panels & N1437 LI437 SOURCEE LEVEL INDICATON YES NO Note t NO Cabi netsYEI /2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & I-437 LS4O7U RC LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I T/H Cabinets 2 20 -nest. & Contol Panels & NI-O75 SORCE LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO Cait YES NO Nt 2 20 -Inst. & Contol Panels N&N L-At0 L"470 SOURC LEVEL INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO O Cabinets IR-1310 2 20 -Inst. &Contol PanelsC e NI-3O SOURCE RANGE INDICATION YES NO Note & NO 2 20 -Inst. & ContoS Panels & P NU2 SSURIZER HAVER INDICATO R YES NO Note I NO I 2 20 -Inst. & Contol Panels & C-460 LC-42N0 P42 STURIEA PRE INDICATOLR YES NO Note I NO I Cabint 2 20 lst. & Control Panels & N034 S TE R ESS CN TROLLER YES NO Note t YES Co-ines 2 20 -Ist. &Nontol PanelsLabPI-I-5751 STATIO RENGE INDICAT IO R YES NO Note. NO 0 2 25 -Inst. & Contol Panels & I R -42 SERVCEVE INDICATWCR YES NO Note I NO Cabines U-920 INIAO 2 20 -Inst. 9 Panels& II-PBR PBUR SVCIAERPRE ATE R YES NO No&e NO 2 20 -Inst. & Contol PanelsR PI-419 PNI-192R SVCWTER PRESS INDICATIOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets P 2 20 -Inst. & Conbo Panels & PN4IP-329 SOURC SEM PRANE IDCATONTRLE YES NO Note I E CabinetsO 2 20 -InsV. & Control Panels & P-39 P43 SG#3SEMPESCNRLRYE NO oe YSI Cabinets N-5 SUC AG NIAINYS N o.I N 2 20 -InsV. a Control Panels 9 C49 P-4 G#4SEMPESCNRLP E O Nt E Cabinets N-6 SUC AG NIAINYS N oeI N 2 20 -Inst, & Control Panels 9 N]I14 I-414 SOUCTAT NG AIRNDCLAERTREIONDIAO YES NO Nowe I O Cabinets N 2 20 -tnstr. & Contro Panels & N12 SOURVCE RANGER NUICLAR EDE RESR YES NO Note I N_ _Cabiners NO110 P110 NIA O 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & PI-1191R PBU9PRESVSUWATER PRESNIATE BAKPGO UP2 YES NO Note i N Cabinets N 2 0-nU&o~laesCabinets PC4-192 PC4192 SVG WA1TEAM PRESS CONTROLLOR YES NO Note I NO I 2 20 -Insbr. & Control Panels & PC-4390 PC4396 SG #23 DSTEAMG PRESS CONTROLLER YES NO Note f YES I Cabinets1 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-27 of 42 C RRN I r I BCREEN SCREENS REEN4 CAP lea~yo-i",OO I UNIT SSE' EQUIP CLASS

• EOUJPENT 'EQE.PO"E.T EQUIPMENT DESCRJPT70N

-.Uneg 0 tMJWMONM -- ..... "...Configuration ContRol 5 s4hection F- U. Hm0). n 2 20 -Ist. & Con.ol Panels & PI-1261 P1-1261 AFW 22 DISCHARGE PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note 1 NO I Cabinets 2 i20 Insi EConnoIPansbm e & Pi-1262 PI-1262 AFW 23 DISCHARGE PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note t NO 1 2 20 -Inst. & Conaol Panels N PI-135 P1-135 NON REGEN HX OUTLET LETDOWN PRESS YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets, INDICATOR 2 20 -Inst. & Contol Panels & Pl-139 PI-139 VCT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets1 2 20 -lnst. & Contol Panels & P1142B PI-142B CHO PP DISCHARGE PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO CabinetsI 2 20 -Inst. A Control Panels A& 1AA P-b D2 TA IDCTRYS N ~ e1 0 2 20 -Inst. A Control Panels & PI-419A P1-419A SD 21 STEAM INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -lsst. A Control Panels & PI-4198 P-419B SO 21 STEAM INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabines%2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & PI-419C PI-419C S0 21 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & PI-423A PI-429A SD 22 ST EAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & PI429C PI-429C S 22 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO 2 Cabinets 2 20 -lnast. & Control Panels & PI149A PI-439A S0 2 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Lnst & Control Panels & P1-439B P"4398 SO 23 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & P1439C PI-439C S 23 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels &Ca stnens P1-49A P1-49A SP 24 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 2 20 -Inst & Control Panels & PW9472 PI-449B SP 24 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 20 -Inst. Contrl Panels P-449C P1-449C SO 24 STEAM PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & P1-455 PI-455 CONTAINEN PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -last. & Control Panels & P"-456 P"456 PRESSURIZER PRESS INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & PI-472 P1-472 PRT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 20 -Inst. & Control Panels &2 20- ns P1-993 P-C5993 RHR PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I YES N 2 20 -Inst. 8 Control Panels 8 PM-940A PI-948A CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -abstr&Control Panels& PI-948B PI-948B CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I 2 20 -Inst. & Cantrol Panels E pM-406C PM-9480C :CN~fM PRESSURE SINLC NVERERCONDTIONER YES NO Note I NO Cabine PG 2 120 -Inssir & Control Panels & pý948A Pi-949A CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Not. 1 NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & PI-949B PI-949B CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO NOtW I NO I Cabinets 2 20abinst tt aels & PI-949B PI-949B CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I CabinelsP.CA P40A PSSRSINLCNRTRONnONR YS NNoe1 OI 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels &int PM-49CB PM-940 COTANMN PRESSURE IINLCNETRCNDIC TIONR YES NO Note I NO I 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & PM-406A PM-406C PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER COND~ITIONER YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -inst,. & Contro Panels & PM-406D PM-40C6 PRESSURE SIGNAL CONVERTER CONDITIONER YES NO Note I NO I_Cabinems Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-28 of 42'S "REEN 1 N C R E N 2 R UN 4tP n S aTety FO ... ...CURRENT TSl S>' _______________

____20-ist onrlPaes' b3 T'-'30 YE 'AO Note t NO -[ , UNI SE ELstr. P C CLASS E " E IP4 EN .E1T EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIN Nr Mtnt N I'-~~~ ~ ~ R 'P .~ AA'$ t}"10'uao

.~ aress L-eca A Re-ya 2 20 -Instr. & Cntl Panels & TI-12A TI-126 C.. FLOW TO ROD EMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -Instr & Connal Panels a T1 ON REGEN OUTLET LETDOWN TEMPte NO Cabinets T 0 INDICATORY 2 20 I instr &Control Panels & TI-42A T1-411A RCS LOOP 21 DELTA TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note NO Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & T-412A T14-2A RCS LOOP 21 OVER TEMP DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & TI-420 T1422 RCS LOOP 21 OVER TEMP DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -Inst. & Connol Panels & T1-42C T1,412C RCS LOOP 21 Tang TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -insts. & Canne Panels & TI412iA TI-"21A RCS LOOP 22 DELTA T TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -inst. & Control Panels & T-422A TI-422A RCS LOOP 2R OVER TEMP DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & TI-A22C T1-422C RCS LOOP 24 TanO TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 1CT 2 20 -Insts &Canto Panels & TI-43tA TI-431A RCS LOOP 23 DELTA T TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Nate I NO Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & TI-432A TI-432A RCS LOOP 23 OVER TEMP DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Note. NO Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -Inst. & Connol Panels & T-42B TI4328 RCS LOOP 23 OVER PWR DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -Instr. & Control Panels & T -A42C TI-A32C RCS LOOP 23 Tang TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. & Cantrol Panels & TI-A5A TI-A445 RCS LOOP 24 DELTA T TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr. & Contaol Panels & T-442A T44 PEA 6S0 LOOP 24 OVER TEMP DELTA T SET POINT YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & TI-472 TI-442B RO LOOP 2 OVA PWR DELTA T SET POINT NO I Cabinets INDICATOR 2 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & TI-12C TI-412C ROD LOOP 22 Tan TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -instr & Control Panels & T"-453 TI-453 PRESSURIZER LIQUID TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Inst. S Connol Panels & TI42A T-4D PRESSURIZER STEAM TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Insti & Control Panels & TI-41 T-1 PRY TEMP INDICATOR YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr & Panels & TR TEMP CONTROLLER CONTAINMENT AVERAE YES NO Nte NO CabiTtsC-1203 TIC-1203 TEMP YS N o.I N 2 20 -Inst.- & Canneol Panel. & TR-At3 TR-413 LOOP 210&22 TEMP RECORDER YES NO Nate I YESI Cabinets I 2 20 -Instr & Conoel Panels & TR-423 T R-423 TEMPERATURE RECORDER YES NO Note REMOVED I Cabinets 2 20 -Insti. & Contaol Paels & TR-433 TR-433 LOOP 220&24 TEMP RECORDER YES NO Nate I YESI Cabinets ______2 20 -lnst. & Control Panels & TRT-3A TR-13A TEMPRECORDER YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Instr & Contro Panels &2 C2a-inest TTatlPaes&

f-1203 TT-1203 ICONTAINMENT Tang TEMP TRANSMITTER YES sO Nate I NO1 2 20 -Instr. & Cannrot Panels & TT-1 2030 TT-1203A TOTALIZER YES NO Nate 1 NOI Cabinets 2 20 -C st. e Cannel Panels S VOLTMETER BUS 2A.3A,5A,DA,VOLTMETER YES NO Note I NO I Cabinets ____________________

2 07 -luid-Operated Valees TCV-130 TCV-130 TEMP CONTROL VALVE YES NO YES NO I S 2 0EB -Solenoid-Operated Vaves EP-1 EL. PNEUMATIC VALVE (CCRAC Danper A SOV) YES YES I 5 0 YES X 2 500B- Selenaid.Openaled Vanves EV~lS SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-29 of 42 SCREEN SCREEN 2 SCRIEENJ 3 -F Ine Safety Faeodoa:I T'SSEL5EOUIP CLAS* EQ8P""ENTK E.11P.121'1 EQ",PMENdT .ESCRIPTI Undergo_ M alinsat Ee .... ...... ne 2 088 -Soaenaid-Operaaed Valves EVYlf SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YESC a YES x 2 088 -Solenoid-Operated Valves FVY12 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YESx 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves EVY13 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YESI YES X 2 08E, -Solenoid-Operated Valves EVY14 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES 2 08B -

ated Valves EVY15 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO" -Ea YESn s YES X 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves EVY16 SOLENOID VALVE YES NO YES 2 08B -Solenoild-Operartedl Valves SOV-112A SOV-112A SOLENOID VALVE (CH_LCV-112A Inlet SOV) YES NO NO NO 1 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-112B SOV-112B SOLENOID VALVE (CCV-112B Inlet SOV) YES NO YES NO x X 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1170 SOV-1170 SOLENOID VALVE SOV for 7CV-1114)

YES NO YES YES I X 2 08N -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1171 SOV-1171 SOLENOID VALVE (SOV fo, TCV- 105) YES NO YES NO I X 2 08B -Solena~d-Operated Valves SOV-1177 SOV-1177 21 AFTERCOOLER INLET SOLENOID YES NO YES NO I xx X It X 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1178 SOV-1 178 22 AFTERCOOLER INLET SOLENOID YES NO YES NO I X x x xX 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1314 SOV-1314 SOLENOID VALVE (21 SGBD Ilabon) YES NO YES NO I x 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1315 SOV-1315 SOLENOID VALVE (22 SOSO Isolaton)

YES NO YES YES I X 2 08B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1316 SOV-1316 SOLENOID VALVE (23 SGBD Isolation)

YES NO YES NO X 2 088 -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1317 SOV-1317 SOLENOID VALVE (24 SGBD -OElittSon)

YES NO YES YES X 2 0EB -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1321 SOV-1321 SOLENOID VALVE (21 AFoP RTCNt) YES NO YES NO I x 2 58B -Solenoid-Operated Valves SOV-1323 SOV-1323 SOLENOID VALVE (23 AFSNP Rerc) YES NO YES NO I X 2 08B -Solenoid-Operlated Valves SOV-1428 SOV-1428 SOLENOID VALVE (N valve PCVSN228)

YES NO YES NO L E X X x x 2 0SB -SolenoId-Operated Valves SOV-149 SOV-149 SOLENOID VALVE (N2o-Reg HX Outleo ) YES NO NO YES I 2 0E e Fans 21CPEF-BLWR 21CPEF CB PURGE & PAS EXH FAN YES NO YES NO I xIs dn 2 09 -Slno a 21CRDF 21CRDF CONTROL ROD DRIVE VENT FAN 21 YES NO NO YES 2 09 -nFans 21ETEF-BLWR 21ETEF EXHAUST FAN YES NO YES NO A P e r X 2 098- Fans 22CPEF-BLWR 22CPEF CB PURGE & PA- EXH FAN YES NO YES NO I X X X x 2 098- Fens 22ETEF-BLWR 22ETEF EXHAUST FAN YES NO YES NO I X X X x X 2 098- -ans CPFBD CPFBD BYPASS DAMPER YES NO NO NO I 2 09 -Fans CPFFD CPFFD FACE DAMPER YES NO NO NO 2 59 -Fans WALL FAN 213 F-213 WALL FAN #213 YES NO YES NO I X X X x X 2 09 -Fans WALL FAN 215 F-215 WALL FAN 0215 YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 09 -Fans WALL FAN 216 F-216 WALL FAN #216 YES NO YES NO x x X X X 2 S -Fans WALL FAN 318 F-318 EDG BLDG FAN YES NO YES' NO [ X X X x x t EDG wall fans support functions but not directly Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-30 of 42 SE. CREEN 2 ~SCREEP1 SCREEN4 P1~tFBBNMr,.

CU111R .I:1' NT Sýl NIT 5ýEL EQ'UIP CLASS EQJMNT EQIMNOESCRIP11ON I* .-,roEB Bl~ ~ ~ IB hilO).,.>

Hig RemB HI Coi Sren ID~~i iI.

.C.,,,Rf-,g.W...

I,.. on.e. ..'....EET-i B- e -1.1,.BPBNNSurBediry sr-N2 0 -r ans WALL FAN 319 319 EDG BLDG FAN YES NO YES NO I X X x x X 2 09 -Fans WALL FAN 320 F-320 EDG BLDG FAN YES NO YES NO I x X X X X 2 09 -FEans WALL FAN 321 F-321 EDG BLDG FAN YES NO YES NO I x X X X X 2 09 -Fans WALL FAN 322 F-322 EDG BLDG FAN YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 D9 -Fans WALL FAN 323 F-323 EDG BLDG FAN YES NO YES NO I x X x X X 2 10 -Air Handlers 11IlPi-S024 11I1PI-S024 FIRE DAMPER BANK YES NO NO NO I 2 10 -Air Handler. WALL FAN 319DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES 1 NO I X X x X x 318- DM WALL FAN 329DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X x x x x 2 10 -Air Handlers 319-DM 2 10 -Air Handlers WALL FAN 320DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X x X X S 321-DM 2 10 -Air Handlers WALL FAN 322DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES NO I 5 x 5 X X 321,DM 2 10 -Air Handlers WALL FAN 322DMPB PEEM OPERATED ALU DAMPEN YES NO YES NO I S X x X____ __________________322-SM WALL FAN 323DMPR PNEUM OPERATED ALU DAMPER YES NO YES NO I 5 5 5 B 2 10 -Air Handlers CCRHI CCR-H1 DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X X X X S 2 10 -Air Handlers CCRH2 CCR.H2 DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X x x x x 2 10 -Ar Handlers CCNJ1 CCR-JI DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X X X x X 2 10 -Ar HandlerN CCRJ2 CCR.J2 DAMPER YES NO YES NO I X X x X x 2 10 -Air Handlers FD-21 FD213 AUTOMATIC SHUTTER 213 YES NO YES YES I X x X X , 2 10 -Air Handlers FD-16 FD215 AUTOMATIC SHUTTER 215 YES NO YES YES I X X X x X 2 10 -Air Handlers FD-12 FD216 AUTOMATIC SHUTTER 216 YES NO YES YES I X x X X x 2 10 -Air HandLers IP1.-009 FIRE DAMPER BANK YES NO NO YES 1 2 10 -Ar HarrdlerNs L-21 L-21 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bldg) YES NO YES NO I 5 x x X X 2 10 -Air Handlers L-214 COMB LOUVER/INTAKE RLF DAMPER YES NO NO YES I 2 10 -Air Handlers L-22 L-22 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bldg) YES NO YES NO I x X X X X 2 10 -Arr Handlers L-23 L-23 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bidg) YES NO YES NO I x x x X X 2 10 -Air Handlers L-24 L-24 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bldg) YES NO YES NO I X X X x X 2 10 -Air Handlers L-25 L-25 PNEUM OPERATED INTAKE LOUVER (EDG Bldg) YES NO YES NO I x X x x X 2 14 -DiNsfibubon Panels OP-1 PNL EPA77 EDG VENT DISTRIBUTION PANEL 1 YES NO YES NO I X X X x X 2 14 -Distibubon Panriels DP-2 PNL EPA78 EDG VENT DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2 YES NO YES NO I X X X X x 2 14 -

Parrels CVDP21 PNL EPZ28 CCR VENT DISTRIBUTION PANEL 21 YES NO YES NO I X X x X X 2 14 -DisIburbon Panels PNL EPZ29 CCR VENT DISTRIBUTION PANEL 22 YES NO YES NO I x X X X 5 2 14 -Distibution Panels PNL JCI FAN ROOM CONTROL PANEL YES NO YES NO I X X 5 5 2 20 -Inst. & Contol Panels & IP2-CB NO YES NO I x Cabinals CCR BACK DN D9:RACK LOGIC RACK YES NO YS OIS Same as EDG wall fans Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-31 of 42 SCRN SE REEýN SCREEN 2 SCREN f CEN I elty Fen-nen L C S E QIP M.ENT EQUPMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRION .". .dengo.,q RE"No 8 nE .I 2 c o1 ..(r i m ) .. --.....ao;ae1., .... Pa....ls EPn r BOe CONTROL PANEL A(,(VSWS .N.) YES NO NO NO, 2* 20 Replened &PEE Contro Panels &e 2 20 -nE & Con0l Panels & EPF8 SOV CONTROL PANEL B (IVSWS VeRes) YES NO NO NO I 2 CaSinets 2 20 -& Control Panels & II-PBU1 PBU1 PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP 21 YES NO YES NO IX Cabinets 2 20 -Insr., S Conrol Panels & II-PBU3 PBU3 PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP 23 YES NO YES NO I Cabinets 2 20-&AR RECEIVER I VENT PNEUMATIC CONTROL Y PN NO PN_ Cebine. PAE 2 2 -Inst. & Contol Panels & PNL GAS GAS ANALYZING PANEL YES NO NO NO I_ Caeinets PANLZ 20 -InNox. & Control Panels & PP2 CB-53 Cbe CCR S PL PNL A#2 ASSESSMENT PANEL #2 YES NO YES NO I 2P2-CB 2 -n & Coll Panels & CCR AAS PNL PNL A#3 ASSESSMENT PANEL #3 YES NO YES NO I X X X X2 2 20 -Inst, & Control Panels & PNL EPH SAMPLING SYSTEM CONTROL PANEL #1 YES NO NO NO I Cabinets 2 20 -Ins,. & Conuol Panels & PNL EP11 SAMPLING SYSTEM CONTROL PANEL #2 YES NO NO NO I Calbinets 20 -Insc. & Contra Panels & NO 2 -CbineSt RACK RLYBOX FAN ROOM RELAY BOX YES NO NO 2 21int -O. I, nNO 2 20 aIbnSe. Conol PanelN RACK BOX 092 RACK BOX 092 YES NO NO 1 CaSinets 2 20 -Insris & Control Panels & RAKBX$3 RC O 9 E ONO N CabinetsAKBXS9 AKBXS9 E ON 20 -Inst & Conlool Panels & NO 2 Cabins RACK BOX 094 RACK BOX S94 YES NO NO 20 -Inst. & Control Panels & NO 2 ain RACK SOX S95 RACK SOXS95R YES NO NO PanelsntsSNNO 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21SWHX 0021SWHX SEAL WATER HEAT EXCH NO. 21 YES NO NO NO I 2 21 .Tanks and Heal Exchangers 0021XXD 21 INSTR AIR DRYER SKID YES NO YES YES I x X X X X 2 21 Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22CWHX 0022CWHX 22 1A CMPR CL COOLING WATER HX YES NO YES NO I x x X X X 2 21 Tanks and Heat Exchangers 0022LAXXF 22 INST AIR PREFLTR/AFTERFLTR SKID YES NO YES YES I x x X X X 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22PLHX 0022PLHX PRESSURIZER LIQUID SAMPLER HX 22 YES NO NO NO I B 2 21 -Twnks and Heat ExchangerN 22PLHX 0022PLHX PRESSURIZER LIQUID SAMPLER HX 22 YES NO NO NO I B YES 2 21 -TanksandHeatE.ýcOangens 21AT 21SISACC 21 SISACCUMULATOR YES NO NO TB B x x x YES 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 22AT 22SISACC 22 SIS ACCUMULATOR YES NO NO I T.. x x xrans 2 21 -Twnks and Heat Exchangens 22RCHX 0022RCHX 22 RC SAMPLE HX YES NO NO NO I 2 21 -Tenks and Heat Exchangers 0022XXD 22 INSTR AIR DRYER SKID YES NO YES YES I X X X X X 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21CWHX 21CWHX 21 VA CMPR CL COOLING WATER HX YES NO YES NO I X X X x X 2 21 -Te.nEN end Reel Ecchengen 21 ACA 21 IACA INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 21 YES No YES NO AFTERCOOLER 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Ehangers 21IAR 21 AR INSTRUMENT AIR RECEIVER YES NO YES NO I X X X X X 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 211AXXF 21 INST AIR PREFILTERIATTERFILTER SKID YES NO YES YES I X X X X X 2 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers 21PLHX 21PLHX PRESSURIZER LIQUID SAMPLER HX 21 YES NO NO NO I Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-32 of 42 SCREEN -NSS2 4 CL RRI T SSEL~ ______ ___UNIT -EL EQUIP CLASS HEea EPc A ENT EQIAPMENT EQUPIPMENT DESCRIPTION Y UNd.Og. YES NO M_ID ID S.IsmlcI Regular ~IO.R-11 ~l~ PEE nes -High R~tRk e~~~i~ H--i -u , ,7'O T. IAneiry E3= C., ,l 2 21 ranks and Heat EhachngoN 21PRT 21PRT PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK YES NO_ NO NO I TH _____L 2 21 1al and Hoea EahangorN 21PSHX 21PSHX PRESSURIZER STEAM SAMPLE HX 21 YES NO NO NO_____2Z 21 rank and Heat ExctangorN 21RCHIX 2IRCHX 21 REACTOR COOLANT SAMPLE FIX YES NO NO NO S____2 21 Tanks and Heat Enhoogon iACCET IACCET EXPANSION TANK YES NO YES NO I S S S S S NOTE 1: These components are included with components previously identified under equipment classes 18 and 20.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-33 of 42 Table 2 SWELl List SWEL# EQUIPMENT I D ESCRIPTION BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN TE CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP SWSTR PIT 5-9" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 0 0, H N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-001 0022SWPS AUTOMATIC STRAINER SWELl-002 0024SWPS NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP SWSTR PIT 5-9" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 0 0, H N SEE SWEL SHEET________AUTOMATIC STRAINER SWEL1-003 22AT 22 SIS ACCUMULATOR VC 46-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-004 MS-47A MS-47A AFB 77'-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 0 I, T N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-005 PCV-1276 N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 0 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-006 MCC-26A 480 VAC MCC PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-007 MCC-26AA 480 VAC MCC PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-008 MCC-26B 480 VAC MCC PAB 981-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed I I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-009 MCC-26BB 480 VAC MCC PAB 984-0 N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-010 MCC-27A 480 VAC MCC PAB 981-0' N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-011 MCC-29 480 VAC MCC CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-012 MCC-26C 480 VAC MCC CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 1 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-013 BUS 5A 480V BUS 5A CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 2 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-014 BUS 6A 480V BUS 6A CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 2 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-015 52/RTA REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 2 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-016 SSTS STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A CB 151-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 4 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-017 BB8 PRESSURIZER HEATER CB 151-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 4 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET TRANSFORMER SWELI-018 BC2 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 4 I N SEE SWEL SHEET PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP Not Listed SWELl-019 BB9 CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed 4 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-34 of 42 EQUIPMENT SYSTEM SWEL# DESCRIPTION BLDG. 1 ELEV. ROOM TRAIN TYPE CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING SWELI-020 0021SIP SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 PAB 59'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-021 21AFP AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-022 0022AFP AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-023 0023CCP CCW PUMP NO. 23 PAB 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-024 21CLWP 21 I/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PUMP CB 15.-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-025 21BATP BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 PAB 80'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-026 0023CHP NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP PAB 801-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-027 21CSP CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 PAB 68-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 5 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-028 21RHRP RHR PUMP NO. 21 PAB 154-0 N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-029 0022RHRP RHR PUMP NO. 22 PAB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Usted 6 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-030 0022SWP 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP INTAKE 151-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 0, H Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-031 0026SWP 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP INTAKE 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 O, H Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-032 0023FOTP FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 FOST 77'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 0, H N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-033 22RP 22 RECIRC PUMP VC 46'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 6 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-034 PCV- 1310OA AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB AFB 43'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Usted 7 1 N SEE SWEL SHEET STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE SWELl-035 AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB AFB 32'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Usted 7 I N SEE SWEL SHEET PCV-1310B STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE SWEL1-036 JACKET WATER COOLER RETURN EDG 67-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 7 I N SEE SWEL SHEET FCV-1176 FLOW CONTROL VALVE SWELl-037 JACKET WATER COOLER RETURN EDG 67'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 7 I N SEE SWEL SHEET FCV-1176A FLOW CONTROL VALVE I SWELI-038 250A 21 ROP SEAL INJECTION LINE PPEN & MEZZ 51'-0" & 67'- N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I N SEE SWEL SHEET______________ISOLATION VALVE 6" 1_________________

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-35 of 42 EQUIPMENT SYSTEM SWEL# DESCRIPTION SBLDG ELEV. ROOM TRAIN CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING ID TYPE SWELl-039 SWN-51-1A 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE MEZZ 67'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-040 1870 RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE PPEN & MEZZ 51'-0" & 67- N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET VALVE 6" 6 .Ld i 8E SWELl-041 4928 24 RCP SEAL INJECTION LINE ISOLATION VALVE PPEN 51'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-042 HCV-142 BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS PPEN 51'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I N SEE SWEL SHEET VALVE SWELl-043 SOV-1230 SG 21 MSIV SOV AFB 77'-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-044 SOV-1231 SG 21 MSIV SOV AFB 77'-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-045 SOV-1232 SG 21 MSIV SOV AFB 77'-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-046 SOV-1233 SG 21 MSIV SOV AFB 77-4" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 8 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-047 F-318 EDG BUILDING FAN EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-048 22CPEF CB PURGE AND PAB EXHAUST FAN FAN HOUSE 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-049 21CPEF CB PURGE AND& PAB EXHAUST FAN FAN HOUSE 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-050 21ETEF EXHAUST FAN ELE TUNNEL 73'-7" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-051 F-216 WALL FAN #216 CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 9 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-052 21CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 21 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-053 0022CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 22 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-054 0023CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 23 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-055 0024CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 24 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-056 0025CRF CONTAINMENT RECIRC FAN 25 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 10 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-057 CCRAC2 CONDENSING UNIT (24 TONS) TSC 88'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 11 I N SEE SWEL SHEET Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-36 of 42 SWEL# EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION BLDG. ELEV. CAROOM TRAIN SYSTE C ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING ID ROM TAIN TYPE SWELl-058 21 AC INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 21 CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 12 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-059 00221AC INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR 22 CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 12 1 Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-060 22EDAC STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 22 EDG 62'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 12 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-061 21MGS 21 MACHINE GENERATOR SET CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 13 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-062 22MGS 22 MACHINE GENERATOR SET CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 13 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-063 IBUS21 118 VAC INSTRUMENT BUS 21 CB 53'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-064 DPNL22 125 VDC DISTRIBUTION PNL 22 PC4 CB 53'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 1 N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-065 EDD1 TRANSFER SWITCH CB 15,-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-066 EDD2 TRANSFER SWITCH CB 15-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-067 EDC1 STATIC INVERTER #23 MANUAL BY- CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 14 I N SEE SWEL SHEET PASS SWITCH SWELI-068 BATT22 BATTERY BANK CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 15 1 N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-069 BATT22 BATTERY BANK CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 15 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-070 BATT23 BATTERY BANK CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 15 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-071 BATT24 BATTERY BANK CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 15 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-072 MIG BATTERY CHARGER 21 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 16 1 Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-073 EGA3 BA STAERY CHARGER 24 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 16 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-074 EGA1 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #21 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 16 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-07 EG 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #23 CB 33'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 16 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl -076 121EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 17 1 Y SEE SWEL SHEET Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-37 of 42 EQUIPMENT SYSTEM SWEL# ID DESCRIPTION ,BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN S T CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING TYPE SEVRNETACO RWN SWELl-077 0022EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 17 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-078 0023EDG DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 17 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-079 INST RK5 INSTRUMENT RACK 5 AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-080 PCV-1139 AUXILIARY FWP TURBINE SUPP PRESS AFB 18'-6" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I N SEE SWEL SHEET REDUCING VALVE SWELI-081 EDG BLDG 72' ELEVATION ENGINE EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I N SEE SWEL SHEET IP2-EDGB-72-DB6 AUXILIARIES CONTROL PANEL SWELl-082 INST RK 19 INSTRUMENT RACK 19 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-083 INST RK 21 INSTRUMENT RACK 21 VC 68'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 18 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL1-084 ELJ-10 EDG BUILDING THERMOSTAT EDG 72-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 19 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-085 TE-130 NON REGEN OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 19 I N SEE SWEL SHEET ELEMENT SWELI-086 TE-122 EXCESS LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT VCl 46'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 19 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-087 PNL PP9 EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-088 EPK1 SW PUMP #21 STRAINER CONT PNL SWSTR PIT 5'-9" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 0 N SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-089 EPG9 REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CB 15-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 I N SEE SWEL SHEET CABINET, BUS 6A SWELl-O90 22SIP 22 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PAB 59'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-091 PNL EPA10 PAB EXCHANGER

& CB PRG FAN 21 FAN HOUSE 80'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 20 I N SEE SWEL SHEET CONTROL PANEL SWELI-092 21CCST 21 COMPONENT COOLING SURGE PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET TANK SWELl-093 22BAT BORIC ACID TANK PAB 98'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-094 0021RWST 21 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK NTF 82'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 0 Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-095 CST CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK YARD 80'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 0 Y SEE SWEL SHEET Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-38 of 42 SWEL# EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONL BLDG. ELEV. ROOM TRAIN SYSTEM CLASS ENVIRONMENT ANCHOR DRAWING* ID TYPE SWELl-096 21FODT FUEL OIL DAY TANK NO. 21 EDG 72'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-097 21NRHX NON REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21 PAB 981-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWEL 1-098 21CCHX CCW HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21 PAB 80' to 98' N.A. Not Usted Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELl-099 00221ACA INST AIR COMPRESSOR 22 CB 15'-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I N SEE SWEL SHEET SWE__-09 0_221ACA _AFTERCOOLER I SWELI-1O0 O022EDSAT STARTING AIR TANK 22DG EDG 67-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET SWELI-101 21AT 21 SIS ACCUMULATOR VC 46-0" N.A. Not Listed Not Listed 21 I Y SEE SWEL SHEET Key to Environment Code 0 = outdoors H = high humidity T = high temperature I = indoors B = Boron Key to Building Code EDG = Emergency Diesel Generator VC = Vapor Containment PAB = Primary Auxiliary Building AFB = Auxiliary Feed Pump Building CB = Control Building PPEN = Pipe Penetration FOST = Fuel Oil Storage Tank SWSTR PIT = Service Water Strainer Pit INTAKE = Intake Structure TSC = Technical Support Center ELE TUNNEL = Electrical Tunnel MEZZ = Mezzanine Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-39 of 42 Table 3 SWEL2 Base List*~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C E LEV. IJ"OOM , ....=BL2# ," EQUIPMENT ID 1 DESCRIPTION,. ; ..,. .BLD.. EC.LASS EN.........-..N...

2-2-1 21RWPP Refueling Water Purification Pump 21 and Motor PAB 68 Not Listed Not NIA to BL 2 5 IB Listed 2-2-2 21SFPP Spent Fuel Pit Pump 21 and Motor FSB 70 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 iB Listed 2-2-3 22SFPP Spent Fuel Pit Pump 22 and Motor FSB 70 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 IB Usted 2-2-4 21SFPHX Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger FSB 80 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 21 IB Usted 2-2-5 21SFSP Spent Fuel Pool Skimmer Pump 21 FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 I Listed 2-2-6 SFPD Spent Fuel Pit Demineralizer 21 PAB 59 Not Listed Not NIA to BL 2 21 IB Listed 2-2-7 SFPF Spent Fuel Pit Filter 21 PAB 80 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 0 IB Listed 2-2-8 SFPBH Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 0 I Uisted 2-2-9 40TFSBH Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to DL 2 0 I Listed 2-2-10 11OTFSB Ederer Crane (Dry Fuel Storage) FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 0 I Listed Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-40 of 42 Table 4 SWEL2 Rapid Draw-Down List R-2-01 R-2-02 R-2-03 DESCRI.PTION Fuel Transfer Tube Blind Flange (IP2)Fuel Transfer Canal Weir Gate (IP2)Abandoned 4" Pipe Penetration (IP2)EluASISdfbR INCLyUSIOsNyEXCLUSION Excluded.

Routinely disassembled, inspected and reassembled every refueling.

Additionally, excluded per FAQ 3.17.Excluded.

Routinely inspected every refueling.

Additionally, excluded per FAQ 3.16.Excluded.

Not accessible (in Spent Fuel Pool). Additionally, in category of ~piping", not equipment or component.

i-TIU Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-41 of 42 Table 5 WEL2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List SWE.2# .EQUIPMENTID DESCPlPT lONJ2: ...,AIN ON SYSTEM TYPE , CLASS ENvIRONMENT NIR SWEL2-2-O01 21RWPP Refueling Water Purification Pump 21 and Motor PAB 68 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 IB N/A Listed SWEL2-2-002 21SFPP Spent Fuel Pit Pump 21 and Motor FSB 70 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 IB NIA Usted SWEL2-2-O03 22SFPP Spent Fuel Pit Pump 22 and Motor FSB 70 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 5 IB NIA Listed SWEL2-.-OO4 21SFPHX Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger FSB 80 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 21 IB N/A Listed SWEL2-2-O55 SFPBH Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 0 I NIA Listed SWEL2-2-006 4OTFSBH Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to BL 2 0 I NIA Listed SWEL2-z-007 110TFSB Ederer Crane (Dry Fuel Storage) FSB 95 Not Listed Not N/A to B1 2 0 I N/A Lwsted Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page B-42 of 42 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List Approval Prepared by: .________,,_

__.______oDate:

I/I /X /7c..Equipment Selection PersonnelDate01-7--zt.,/

Z.O Reviewed by: .Date: 10 1-o 2..-Peer Reviewer Concurrence by: r .t .-. Date: Operations Personnel t/2 / ~ ~II Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-2 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. 0022SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMA TIC STRAINER Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5'-9" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLi NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Found mild surface corrosion.

Acceptable, not a seismic issue.Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.YN NEI U-I N/A--YN NEI U-I N/A[l YN NEI U-] N/ALl I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-3 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[K Nr-] UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. O022SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI N-I UF" N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N[] U[]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN NEI- UE] N/At-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIZ NEI UD1 N/A[7 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U[: N/A[-l Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEI U[i of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-4 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE Ni-- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. O022SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMA TIC STRAINER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 503080 Rev 0, Intake structure Zum strainer # 22 thru # 26 piping arrangement sections.A-208111, Rev 19, Piping arrangement of automatic strainers in service water system intake structure.

AWC-013 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Nick Crspell Date: 10/23/2012 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-5 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI UnL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. 0022SVWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Photographs Note: Front view of the service water pump automatic strainer.Note: Side view of the service water pump automatic strainer EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-6 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NI- UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-001 Equipment ID No. 0022SWVPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Note: Side view of the service water pump strainer Note: Base plate view of the service water pump strainer support.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-7 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet I of 5 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YO NEIl UL]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-002 Equipment ID No. O024SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Location:

Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5'-9" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Found mild surface corrosion.

Acceptable not a seismic issue.Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

YO NEI UE-] N/AL]YZ NEI UE- N/A-'4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NDI UD- N/AD-Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-8 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YN N-] UFE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-002 Equipment ID No. O024SWPS Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I N[] U[-] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE-I uE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM NE] UIL N/A--Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Strainer is very close (about Y4") to Unistrut channel. Acceptable since it is well secured and target is a hard target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NE] U0 N/A[-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEi UE-] N/AE]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE] U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-9 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-002 Equipment ID No. 0024SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NE] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

(Drawings and AWC)503060 Rev 0, Intake structure Zum strainer # 22 thru # 26 piping arrangement sections.A 208111, Rev 19, Piping arrangement of automatic strainers in service water system intale structure, AWC-013 Evaluated by: Kint Pankh Date: 10/23/2012 Nick Crisnell 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-10 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: Y1 NE] Ufi]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-002 Equipment ID No. 0024SWPS Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Photographs Note: Side view of the service water pump automatic strainer Note: Front view of the service water pump automatic strainer EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-11 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NR- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-002 Equipment ID No. O024SWPS Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description NO. 24 SERVICE WATER PUMP AUTOMATIC STRAINER Note: Base plate view of the service water pump Note: Base plate view of the service water pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-12 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YZ Nr-I UWýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-004 Equipment ID No. MS-47A Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description MS-47A Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 77'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YO NZ YEI NO U-I N/AZ Not applicable since this is an in-line component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NWI uW N/AM Not applicable since this is an in-line component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Not applicable since this is an in-line component.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YO NWI UWI N/A[EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-13 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ NEI UIuI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-004 Equipment ID No. MS-47A Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description MS-47A 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[- NEI U-I N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UI--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NEI U -- N/A[-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NWI U[-W N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NWl UWI N/A[l Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE] UW--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-14 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YN NF] UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-004 Equipment ID No. MS-47A Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description MS-47A Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U[-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 1. SQUG MS-45A 2. DWG 9321-F-2137, Rev 7, Turbune Building, Heated Bay & Yard area, Safety Valve Draingage Piping.3. AWC-036 cf, .hfN'lr l" EValaUtdU Date: 10/25/2012 Y'7 Date: 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-15 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y; NM- ul-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-004 Equipment ID No. MS-47A Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description MS-47A Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-16 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YN NO UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NDI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ NDI U-1 N/AD-Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Y[ NDI UID- N/AD-YZ NDI UD- N/ADl I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix1 B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-17 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NO UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NO ULI N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant documentation.

Drawing: 9321-LL-1 1196 Rev 1 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI Um potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?.

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent fight bulbs need to be secured by wires to the light fixture for good practice.

This is a house keeping issue it is judged the bulbs will not affect this SWEL component.

CR IP2-2012-06483 has been written to resolve this condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YZ NEI U- N/A-YN NO u-- N/AZ-YN NEI ur- N/A-YEE NEI u-I EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-18 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NEI UIur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] N[E U[-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Loose tool is found in the area and needs to be removed. During a seismic event the tool will swing and strike nearby valves/equipment.

See Picture. CR IP2-2012-06483 has been written to remedy this condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 1. SQUG PVC-1276 2. DWG A240155, Rev 4, Auxiliary Boiler Feed Pump Room Instrument Air/Nitrogen Back-up System Piping Arrangement Plan and Details 3. DWG 9321-F-7053, Rev 38, AB Feed Pump Room Instrument Piping -Sheet 2, Instrumentation

4. DWG 9321-F-1208, Rev 8, Shield Wall Area, Concrete Plan El. 18'-6" 5. AWC-035____ Date: 10/25/2012 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan I Date: 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-19 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN Ni' Uor-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES Photographs Note: Close up view of its support.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-20 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-005 Equipment ID No. PCV-1276 Equipment Description N2 BACKUP TO AFW CONTROL VALVES IP2 Status: YN NE-- ULI Equip. Class 1 0 Note: Loose tool is found in the area and needs to be removed.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-21 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE] NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-006 Equipment ID No. MCC-26A Equip. Class' 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is internal to cabinet and can not be inspected at current time. Cabinet should be powered down and opened for inspection.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Anchorage is internal to cabinet and can not be inspected at current time. Cabinet should be opened for inspection.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant cracks external to cabinet. Intemaly should be inspected.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YO NEI Y-I NE] U[ N/AE]YE]- NE] UE N/AEI YE-] NEI U[ N/AE]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-22 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YDI ND-I UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-006 Equipment ID No. MCC-26A Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI Nil UZ N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing 932 1-LL- 11049 sht.4 Rev 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO] NE] UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See comments in line 2 and 3 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YO NE] U-] N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEi NE U[:] N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs need wire securing bulb to fixture. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to resolve.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] ULi N/A[l Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[:]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-23 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YEl- NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-006 Equipment ID No. MCC-26A Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cover screws on divider between MCC cubicals 3D & 4D not secured. Judged not to be seismic concern. CR IP2-2012-06605 issued to resolve.

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:

9321-LL-11049 sht.4 Rev 1 Auxiliary control panels for DG 31,32,33, Auxiliary control panels P7A.9321-F-1 1051 Rev 1 Auxiliary control panel P7A AWC-023 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-22-2012

-;ýj w4fýh ý -0) az Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-24 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YO NO UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-006 Equipment ID No. MCC-26A Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs No photos Note: No photos possible due to proceduraly required camera standoff distance.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-25 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE- NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-007 Equipment ID No. MCC-26AA Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area MCC Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinet cubicals should be opened but are not allowed to be opened at power.External anchroage at top to unistrut and exterior weld at bottom checked and found to be free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware for exterior visible anchorage.

Interior could not be examined.

MCC needs to be opened and internals inspected.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YEI NEI U[ N/AE[YE] N[-] UN N/AE]YEI] NEI UN N/AE]Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors when inspected externally.

Interior can not be examined until MCC is opened and internaly inspected.

1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-26 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YWI NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-007 Equipment ID No. MCC-26AA Equip. Class' 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-] NE] UE N/AEJ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

External stitch weld at bottom and anchorage with unistruts at top matches SQUG (SEWS). Internals could not be examined.Reference Dwg: 9321-F-20063-28 (A201805)

Rev-28, 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEI NEI UIE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above external only inspection anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions as inspected externally.

Interior could not be examined.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Florescent light with no safety wire is contrary to good seismic practice and must be secured to fixture. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Florescent bulbs can fall and impact MCC.Y[ NE] UE] N/AE]YEI NO UE- N/AEI YE NEI UE] N/A[D YE] N[ UE]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-27 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SE Sheet 3 of 4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-007 Equipment ID No. MCC-26AA Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

EISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YEI- NE] UN Equip. Class' I YO NEI U[]Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings: 9321-F-20063(A201805), Rev-28, Turbine building and heater bay general arrangement ground floor plan at elev 15'.9321-F-10323(A201331), Rev 5, Turbine building concrete plan at elev. 15' S.E portion.AWC-024 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell 0 Ake, ~/61 4~QM V~N~Date: 10-22-2012 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-28 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YIZ NM- UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-007 Equipment ID No. MCC-26AA Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: MCC Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-29 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YEI NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-008 Equipment ID No. MCC-26B Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?MCC can not be opened at current time but should be. Anchorage not visible from outside. MCC is to be powered down and opened when possible.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NEI YEI NEI UZ N/AE1 YE-] NE- U[ N/AE]Anchorage not visible from outside.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE- NE: U[E N/AE No cracks of significance outside of MCC. Intemal anchorage is not visible from outside.,Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-30 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YOl NO] UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-008 Equipment ID No. MCC-26B Ec Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Internal anchorage is not visible from outside.Reference Drawing: 9321-F-2510-49 (A200627), Rev 49 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Internal anchorage is not visible from outside.luip. Class' I YLI NEI UZ N/A[]YEll NEIl uO Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ NEll U[I N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEl- NO U-' N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs need wire restraints securing bulb to fixture. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEl U[:] N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[-] NO UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Unsecured fluorescent bulbs could fall on MCC.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-31 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YE] NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-008 Equipment ID No. MCC-26B Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NOi U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Loose cover screw on MCC cubical 6D & 6H. Missing cover screw on Aux. Component Pump cubical 5KR, and on one bottom cover plate. MCC judged seismicly acceptable given location and quantity of remaining screws. CR IP2-2012-06605 issued to track repair of screws.

References:

Drawings and AWC Dwg DMD 311678-AA, 9321-F-2510(A200627), Rev 49 Primary Auxiliary building general arrangement plans.AWC-023%JýQg C r Evaluated by: Ali,'l,, rýll Date: 10-22-2012 V -0)mt flsn NijtR 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-32 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE] NE] UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-008 Equipment ID No. MCC-26B Equip. Class' 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: MCC-26B. Not other pictures allowed while meeting the proceduraly required 6' stand off distance.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-33 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YEI NF- U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-009 Equipment ID No. MCC-26BB Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB -. Floor El. 98'-0" Room., Area MCC Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?External anchorage checked and found to be acceptable.

Cubicals are to be opened and anchorage of internal components checked.Cubicals are not allowed to be openned when cubicals are powered.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes for external anchorage.

Internals to be examined after opening the cabinet.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NEI YE NE U[ N/IA YE- NE U[ N/AEl YE NE U[ N/A[No significant cracks external to cabinet. Internals to be examined.1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-34 of 434 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM ATTACHMEIN Sheet 2 of IT 9.6 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YI N-I UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-009 Equipment ID No. MCC-26BB Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NO U[-E N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches SQUG (SEWS) for external anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE-- NO UZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Internals to be examined at a latter time. Externals are acceptable.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NO ULI N/AEj 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NO Ur- N/A[E and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent light with no safety wire is contrary to good seismic practice and must be secured to fixture. Bulbs are not over top of MCC and therefore MCC is acceptable seismicly.

CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YE NEI U[-] N/A[E 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12,-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-35 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-009 Equipment ID No. MCC-26BB Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEE NE] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC.Drawings:

9321-F-70693 Rev, 2 Primary Auxiliary building general arrangement plan at elev. 55'instrumentation.

9321-F-25153(A202087), Rev 22, Primary Auxiliary building general arrangement plan at elev. 55' & 73'.SK-020 Rev 0 sht. 1 & 2, MCC-36B PAB elev. 55'.A208570, Rev 4, Equipment arrangement for post accident remote valve control sampling selection center.A200250 AWC-024%A;(ýg Evaluated by: fI-irL Cricn ll Date: 10/22/2012 Ll-Dan Nuta 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-36 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI NI] US Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-009 Equipment ID No. MCC-26BB Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: North half of MCC room. Other photos not allowed due to proceduraly required camera standoff requirements.

Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-37 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P2 Status: YE[- NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-010 Equipment ID No. MCC-27A Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is intemal to MCC and is not visible from the exterior.Cubicals are to be opened but are not allowed to be opened when cubical is powered. MCC to be powered down and MCC opened for inspection.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Anchorage is internal to MCC & is not visible from the exterior.

Cubicals are to be opened but are not allowed to be at the current time.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NEi Yll NEI U[ N/AEJ YEI NEI UZ N/AE1 YE NEI UE N/AE No cracks of significance external to MCC. Need to examine internaly.

1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-38 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YE] NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-010 Equipment ID No. MCC-27A Equip. Class' 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE- NEI UE N/AE[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference SQUG (SEWS) for anchorage details. MCC needs to be opened to see anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

MCC needs to be opened.YE- NEI UN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.NEi UE-] N/AE:]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE] N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE] U[E- N/AE]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI U[E]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-39 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI- Nij UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-010 Equipment ID No. MCC-27A Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEl UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1 of 6 cover screws loose on north power panel. Judged not to be a seismic concern.CR IP2-2012-06605 issued to track resolution.

References.:

Drawings and AWC.Drawings:

9321-F-2510(A200627), Primary Auxiliary building general arrangement plans.AWC-023 qý)ý41 enýýEvaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-22-2012

-:ý ýýý ý -0) mv.Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-40 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YDI NEI- UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-010 Equipment ID No. MCC-27A Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs No photos Note: No photos possible of component due to proceduraly required camera standoff requirements.

Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-41 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y-' NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-011 Equipment ID No. MCC-29 Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NEl Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Internal anchorage not visible from outside. Cabinet shall be opened when MCC is powered down to inspect internal concrete anchorage and anchorage of internal components to the cabinet.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Cannot be determined since anchorage is internal to cabinet and door could not be opened.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor coated. No noticable cracks of significance.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YO-- NEI U[ N/AII Y[I NEI UN N/AE]Y[ NEI UE-- NIAII EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-42 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YO NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-011 Equipment ID No. MCC-29 Equip. Class' I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI- N-il UE N/Afl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Cannot be determined since anchorage is internal to cabinet and door could not be opened. Anchorage to be per SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEI- NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Cannot be determined since anchorage is internal to cabinet and door could not be opened.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NEI U[-] N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEl uE] N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall is seismicily qualified by Computech report No. R547. 01.Floresent bulbs need to be secured to the fixture with wires. CR IP2-2012-06120 trqcks installation of wires to tie florescent bulb to fixture. It is judged the hard target MCC will remain operable if the florescent bulbs were to fall on it.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE N[I U-I N/AEl Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEIl U[-]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-43 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YO-- NO UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-011 Equipment ID No. MCC-29 Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC.Drawings: A206640, Rev. 10, Arrangement of equipment in Cable Spreading room elev. 33'-0" west half plan &sects SQUG (SEWS)AWC-004 qvlýg C r Evaluated by: Nick Crisnell Date: 10/11/2012 A-V/ý.qt&.nhpn Yiin 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-44 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Shoot 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE- NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-011 Equipment ID No. MCC-29 Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-45 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YO-- NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-012 Equipment ID No. MCC-26C Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage internal to cabinet. Plant operations not allowed to open cubicals when powered. MCC is to be powered down and internal anchorage and anchorage of internal components inspected.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y[ NE-1 YE-- N[-' UI N/AE[YEr NE U[ N/AE]See answer to question 2.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YEI NEI UN NIAE]See answer to question 2.I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-46 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: Y[-- ND UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-012 Equipment ID No. MCC-26C Equip. Class 1 I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI Nil UZ N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Cannot be determined since anchorage is internal to cabinet and door could not be opened. Anchorage to be per SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEI- NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

MCC needs to be opened.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NE] UE] N/AE-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NE uEr] N/A[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall qualified by computech report no. R547. 01.Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinets will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie florescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.Y[ NEI UE' N/AE1 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-47 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YEI NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-012 Equipment ID No. MCC-26C Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NiE ULi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEJ UiJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Spare MCC26X-4H cubical missing I of 2 lock latches. MCC judged seismicly acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06509 issued to track resolution.

References:

Drawings and AWC A206640, Rev. 10, Arrangement of equipment in Cable Spreading room elev. 33'-0" west half plan &sects SQUG (SEWS)AWC-004 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10-11-2012 qv(ý;ar&qýýNirk rri.,znP.II 10-11-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-48 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE[ NR-] UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-012 Equipment ID No. MCC-26C Equip. Class' I Equipment Description 480 VAC MCC Photographs Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-49 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ ND- U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-013 Equipment ID No. BUS 5A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 5A Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE- NZ The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cubicle doors were opened. Internals were examined and judged to be anchored adequately.

Visible floor anchorage acceptable.

It was noted most breakers did not have a lower left bolt and/or smaller bottom bolts connecting the breaker to the back of the cubicle. Missing bolts where judged acceptable given weight of breakers and large diameters of 3 other existing bolts. Following walkdown issue was discussed with Breaker Component Engineer (Lubrano) who said bolting was normal and acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NEI UE] N/AF-Y; NE] UE] N/Ar-]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-50 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-013 Equipment ID No. BUS 5A Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 5A 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEE NEI U[] N/AD anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO NEI ULI] N/A](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[] N[-] U[potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinets will protect intemals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

Masonry (brick & block) walls in the area are seismically qualified per Computech report R547.01.YN N N UD A NAD YN NEI uD- N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-51 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 iP2 Status: YN NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-013 Equipment ID No. BUS 5A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 5A 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NF-I U-I N/A[:-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Overhead breaker hoist is adequately secured.YIN NEI UED Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A219340, Rev 2, Conduit layout control building elevation 15'-0" plan for install of fire dampers.209196, Rev 11, Control building fire detection system, cable spread room elev 33'-0" CR IP2-2012-06120 AWC-002~2 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-9-2012 Stephen Yuan Dan Nuta 10-9-2012 10-9-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-52 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NE- Uni Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-013 Equipment ID No. BUS 5A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 5A Photographs Note: Pictures could not be taken while meeting the procedural camera standoff requirement.

Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-53 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YN NEIL ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-014 Equipment ID No. BUS 6A Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 6A Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cubicle doors were opened. Internals were examined and judged to be anchored adequately.

Visible floor anchorage acceptable.

It was noted most breakers did not have a lower left bolt and/or smaller bottom bolts connecting the breaker to the back of the cubicle. Missing bolts where judged acceptable given weight of breakers and large diameters of 3 other existing bolts. Following walkdown issue was discussed with Breaker Component Engineer (Lubrano) who said bolting was normal and acceptable.

Cubicle 52/3A T6A Bus tie 3A to 6A 480V 6A-7B was racked out and work inprogress tagged with having a broken rack stop mechanism.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YDI NO YE NEI uIJE N/AEl YE NEI ULI N/AD-Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-54 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YE Nr-I U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-014 Equipment ID No. BUS 6A Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 6A 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NEi UM- N/A[-I anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO- NOI- U[:] N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ N-] ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinets will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

Masonry (brick & block) walls are in the area and are seismically qualified per Computech report R547.01.YM NE ul N/AE]YZ NE] uE- N/A-]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-55 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 3 of 4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-014 Equipment ID No. BUS 6A Equipment Description 480V BUS 6A 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM 1P2 Status: YZ NO UI u Equip. Class 1 2 YE NEI U~l N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] U[I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Overhead breaker hoist is adequately secured with chain and lock.Y[ NEIU[-l Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings:

A219340, Rev 2, Conduit layout Control Building elev. 15-0 plan for install of fire dampers SQUG (SEWS)CR IP2-2012-06120 AWC-002 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell%A;(~49 4~Date: 10-9-2012 10-9-2012.gtpnhv~n VII~n St-hen Yuan ýqm fl3in AI,,ft 10-9-2012 Dan NHta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-56 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-014 Equipment ID No. BUS 6A Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 480V BUS 6A Photographs Note: Pictures could not be taken while meeting the procedural camera standoff requirement.

Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-57 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YEI NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-015 Equipment ID No. 52/RTA Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinet anchorage inspected by looking through bottom vent opening.All visible anchors in good condition.

Anchorage of components internal to cabinet could not be examined at time of inspection.

Cabinet to be powered down and internals inspected.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE[I NO YE] NEI UE N/AE[YZ N[] UE- N/A[]Mild surface corrosion acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NEi U0] N/AE]Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-58 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YEI- NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-015 Equipment ID No. 52/RTA Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI U[I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEI NE[- UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the externaly visible anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Internals to be inspected when cabinet is powered down. See questions 2.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE N I U[:] N/AE!8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UI- N/All and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinet will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture for added protection.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI NE! U0- N/AO Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEl U[i of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-59 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[-I NEI- UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-015 Equipment ID No. 52./RTA Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NI-] U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cover on west side of cabinet is missing 3 of 14 screws. Cabinet with missing screws judged acceptable during seismic event. CR IP2-2012-06155 issued to track resolution.

See AWC-003 for reference.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings:932 1-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building.AWC-003)qýEvaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/11/2012 quý49 r 06klp-av Nick Crisoell 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-60 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y'- NO UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-015 Equipment ID No. 52/RTA Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A Photographs Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-61 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YZ NEI Ull Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-016 Equipment ID No. SST5 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is present but is internal to transformer which makes anchors not visible externally.

Multiple bolts present securing cover shut, no hinge present so panels are not required to be opened.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y-I NO YOZ NEI UD NIAIZ YEI NEI UD- N/AN Anchorage not visible.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YDI NDI UDl N/AZ Anchorage not visible.I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-62 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND-- UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-016 Equipment ID No. SST5 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YD3 NEI Ur- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI u-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN Ni UO N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND U-I N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs overhead are unsecured and could fall out of the light fixture. Hard target cabinets will protect internals from damage. Judged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to tie fluorescent bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

Masonry (brick & block) walls in the area are seismically qualified per Computech report R547.01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIN ND U- N/AD:]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-63 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NO U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-016 Equipment ID No. SST5 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIZ NEI U[-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UW-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Overhead breaker hoist is adequately secured.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A247343-00, Rev 0, 480V SWGR Room equipment, plan sections and details, control building elev.15'A219340, Rev 2, Conduit layout control building elevation 15'-0" plan for install of fire dampers.9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building.CR IP2-2012-06120 AWC-002~61~ CX~e~QU Evaluated by: Nick Cnspell Date: 10/9,2012___________________

10/9/2012 Steohen Yuan 1l 1019O1201 D Nuta EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-64 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YH NE UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-016 Equipment ID No. SST5 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description STATION SERVICE TRANSFORMER 5A Photographs Note: Pictures could not be taken while meeting the procedural camera standoff requirement of 6'.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-65 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NMi U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-017 Equipment ID No. BB8 Equip. Class' 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN Nl1 The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor coated. No visible cracks.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix1 B: Classes of Equipment.

YN NI ULID N/A--YE NO uD- N/A--Y[ NEI uD- N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-66 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YX NEI- UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-017 Equipment ID No. BB8 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN Nil UEr N/A0-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 126811, 206647 and SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI ur-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulb could fall out of the light fixture and hit component.

Falling bulb would not damage the component because the equipment is protected by a hard case. CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installation of wires to secure bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YN NEI U-I N/AD-YM NEI UDl N/A-]YM NDI U[1 N/AD-I Y[ ND-1 uDl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-67 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YZ NEIr UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-017 Equipment ID No. BB8 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIE NI U[IJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5 holes in both ends for transformer side panel are judged acceptable by walk down team. These holes where judged to be for attaching different components to the case as the holes are high up on the side of the case. Looking through vents there were no internal components in the area of these holes so no bolts in these holes is acceptable.

References:

Vendor drawing 126811, Matra electdc, inc.9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement control building CR IP2-2012-06120 AWC-001 qlvýr&64ýýEvaluated by: Nick Cdispell Date: 10-9-2012*10-9-2012 Stephen Yuan Dan Nuta 10-9-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-68 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NiD U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-017 Equipment ID No.. BB8 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER Photographs No photo due to restriction of EN-DC-217 Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-69 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NiE UI-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-018 Equipment ID No. BC2 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI N 0 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[R NEI uE- N/AEF-YN NE UIE N/AE YO NE UE[ N/AE-Equipment attached to unistrut anchored to a seismicly designed masonry wall. No significant visible cracks in masonry wall.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-70 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YN NEI U[-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-018 Equipment ID No. BC2 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YLI NEI- U[-I N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE NWI U-I N/Ar-Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NWI U-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall qualified by computech report no. R547. 01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Y[Z NEI U-- N/AD-YZ NEI U[-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-71 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND-- UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-018 Equipment ID No. BC2 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ ND- U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

A206648, Rev 46 Conduit layout control building, elev. 33'-0", plan west half A206640, Rev 10, Arrangement of equipment in cable spresd room, elev. 33'-0" AWC-004 q2ph Cfk;Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-11-2012

-:ý Wse ý -0) mv.10-11-2012 Dan NuLa EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-72 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YN NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-018 Equipment ID No. BC2 Equip. Class' 4 Equipment Description 480/120 VAC TRANSFORMER

1. 22 Photographs Note: TransfoinerBC2 Note: Transfonmer BC2 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-73 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP2 Status: Y] ND UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-019 Equipment ID No. BB9 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YN NEl YIN NEI UEi N/ADl YN ND UlI N/AEl Minor surface corrosion on anchors. Judged accepable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[Z NEI uD N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-74 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y; NEI UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-019 Equipment ID No. BB9 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NEI U-II N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 325413.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI uD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM ND-] UD:] N/AD Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDl UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulb could fall on equipment.

But judged accepable due to hardened target. CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installing wire to secure bulb to fixture for good seismic housekeeping.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDl UD- N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIZ NDI UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-75 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NOZ U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-019 Equipment ID No. BB9 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

West side panel cover has one bolt loose. Missing side panel cover bolt/screw on east panel. Both panels missing washer on some bolts. These issues are acceptable seismicly.

CR IP2-2012-06495 issued for tracking.

References:

Drawings and AWC 325413-00, Anchoring of Pressurizer Heater Transformer A206647, Rev. 15, Indian Point No. 2 conduit layout Control Building elevation 15'-0" plan 932 1-F-3052, Rev.38, Equipment arrangement Control Building CR IP2-2012-06495 AWC-001 91Aý49 06kýý-ýEvaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/09/2012

__________________________10/09/2012 Steohen Yuan~NJ~1n 10/09/2012 D Nutaq EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-76 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YI N-] Ur-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-019 Equipment ID No. BB9 Equip. Class 1 4 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER Photographs Note: PRESSURIZER HEATER BACKUP GROUP #22 TRANSFORMER Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-77 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NEIl UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-020 Equipment ID No. 0021SIP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Y[ NDI uDI N/A[--D YN ND] UDI N/AD-I Y] NDI UD] N/AD-1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-78 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 5 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YN NEI UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-020 Equipment ID No. 0021SIP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NEI UI- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 9321-F-1 167.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[9 NEI uD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN ND uD- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

One light bulb is blown out near component.

This is not a seismic issue Lights Out Hotline (X-7600) was contacted regarding the light out. CR IP2-2012-06581 was also issued.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE ND UD] N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND UDi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-79 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NEI U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-020 Equipment ID No. 0021SIP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 9321-F-1 167, Rev 24 (A200107), Primary Auxiliary Building concrete plans at ely. 59' and 68'9321-F-1 166, Rev26 (A200106), Primary Auxiliary Building concrete plans at elv. 15" 35' & 42'AWC-017 CR IP2-2012-06581 Ll VýQq Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/23/2012 Kirit Parikh 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-80 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[O NEIr ul]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-020 Equipment ID No. 0021SIP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 Photographs Note: 21 Safety injection pump, front view Note: The motor of the safety injection pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-81 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-020 Equipment ID No. 0021SIP EauiDment DescDition SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 21 1P2 Status: Y[ NM U-]Equip. Class' 5 Note: The handle of /he S.I pump and associated pipings.Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-82 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YN NF-I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the Rtem one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NEI Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YZ NDI U[-D N/Ar-Y[Z NDI UD- N/ADl YN NDI Ur- N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-83 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YIM NDI Ut-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NEI U[I N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant drawings B227200-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NI UIEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI UD- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND: UD-- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI U[] N/AD-Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM ND Ut]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-84 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NEI UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM N[:I U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The panel attached to the pump is not required to be opened due to the number of bolts closing the cover. The inside of the panel therefore is not inspected.

References:

Drawings and AWC 1. SQUG 0021AFP 2. DWG 9321-F-2014, Rev12 Auxiliary Feed Pump Building General Arrangement Sheet No. 1 3. DWG B227200,Rev 1, Auxiliary Boiler Feed Pumps #21 and #23 4. AWC-035_ --_ _ Date: 10/25/2012 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Paul Huebsch ..Date: 1025/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-85 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YJE NEI ULi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Photographs Note: AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Note: EQUIPMENT TAG EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-86 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YN Nri] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-021 Equipment ID No. 21AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 21 Note: ANCHOR BOLT CLOSE UP VIEW Note: THE PANEL ATTAHCING TO THE PUMP CANN'T BE OPENED. INSIDE OF THE PANEL IS NOT INSPECTED.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-87 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. O022AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 Location:

Bldg. AF Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NEI YN NEI UO N/AOl YZ NO UOi N/A[]YN N[:] UI1 N/A-'Grout at one anchor bolt is chipped off to the edge of the base plate leaving approximately 1Y2" edge distance for the anchor bolt (See photo). Since the grout does not contribute to the pullout cone this is not of consideration for bolt tension. Further, the grout is not considered to contribute to shear capacity and the embedment of the cast-in anchor bolt into the floor does not show evidence of cracking.Therefore, the absence of the grout is not a seismic concern.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-88 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 IP2 Status: YN NOI UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. O022AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YIZ Nil Ul N/A--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant drawings B227200-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YIZ N-l U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ NI] UEI N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NEI U-I N/A--and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ Nil Ui] N/AEl Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI ui of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-89 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: YN ND1 UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. O022AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References.Drawings and A WC 1. SQUG O022AFP 2. DWG 9321-F-1208, Rev8, Shield Wall Area, Concrete plan EL. 18-6" 3. B208484, Rev 3, Auxiliary Building Feed Pump #22 Balancing Chamber Pressure Tap 4. B2279 770, Rev 0, Physical Protectors forAux Boiler Feed Pumps #21, #22, #23 and Valve 846 5. DWG 9321-F-2014, Rev12, AFPB General Arrangement, Plan -SHT. NO 1 6. AWC-035 Date: 10/25/12 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan j 10/25/12 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-90 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YZ NEI Ul]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. O022AFP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 Photographs Note: AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-91 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 5 of 6 1P2 Status: YO NO] Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-022 Equipment ID No. O022AFP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description AUX FEED PUMP NO. 22 Note: One of the scaffold supports is pointing to the conduit.Note: One of the scaffold supports is pointing to the base of nitrogen rack.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-92 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Note: One of the supports is braced to the base of the pump Note: EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-93 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CCWPUMPNO.

23 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68"0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora-qe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NEl The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NEI ULI N/A[-YZ NEI ULIE N/A[--YZ NEI UD N/AEZ Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-94 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: Y] NO UF-Z Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CCW PUMP NO. 23 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN Nil U[I N/A-1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 9321-F-1 167 & 9321-F-1 166.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE N[I-] U[:D potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ NEII UEl N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN N[-] UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs need wire restraint to prevent bulbs from falling during a seismic event. CR IP2-2012-6614 was issued to track resolution.

This is not a seismic issue if the fluorescent bulbs were to fall they would not render the hard target CCW Pump inoperable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NEI U[D N/AD1 Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-95 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NEI Un-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CCW PUMP NO. 23 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI U[I-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-20143, (A201813), Rev 9 Auxiliary feed pump building general arrangement plans Sht. 1 9321-F-1167,(A200107), Rev 24, Primary Auxiliary building concrete, plans at elev. 59' & 68'.9321-F-1 166,(A200106), Rev 26 Primary Auxiliary building concrete, plans at elev. 15',35' & 42'CR IP2-2012-6614 AWC-018 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19/2012 Paul HuebschJ 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-96 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CCW PUMP NO.23 Photographs Note: CCW Pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-97 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-023 Equipment ID No. 0023CCP Eauioment Descriotion CCW PUMP NO, 23 Status: YO NO UD-]Equip. Class 1 5 Note: Typical anchorage EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-98 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE N[] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-024 Equipment ID No. 21CLWP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description 21 1/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PMP Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YOi NO The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NEI UD- N/A[-YO NDI U-] N/AD Minor surface corrosion on anchor bolts. Not significant.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete coated. No significant cracking observed.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NEI ul N/A--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-99 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YM ND ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-024 Equipment ID No. 21CLWP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description 21 I/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NDI U[ N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration venfication.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YIZ NDI U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ NDI U[I N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UDl N/A[]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry brick wall was seismic qualified by Computech Report no.R547.01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI uD- N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-100 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 .1P2 Status: YN NEIl U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-024 Equipment ID No. 21CLWP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description 21 1/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U[-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SQUG (SEWS)AWC-O01 CAUý C6&a Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-9-2012 10-9-2012 Steohen Yuan-Zý ý,ý ý -.ý Wt: 1Dan Nijta 10-9-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-101 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[E NEI Uil Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-024 Equipment ID No. 21CLWP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description 21 1/A CMPR CL COOLING WTR PMP Photographs Note: 21 I/A COMPRESSOR CLOSING COOLING WATER PUMP (RIGHT)Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-102 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.

The base plate has 4 bolts and only 2 are visible. The other 2 are hidden under the lead shielding.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware for the visible bolts.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation for the visible bolts. Since the bolts appear to be stainless steel, it is doubtful that the hidden bolts would have any corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YO NO YO NEI UEI N/AD YZ NEI U-- N/A[D Y N NE U N/AWD Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-103 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NE] Ur-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[--] NEI Ur N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YIE NEI U0I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YN NEI UE1 N/AD YN NE] UE] N/AE[YM NEI uE[ N/AE[YE NEI UEl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-104 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YM NO U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN Nil U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings: 9321-F-1 168, Rev. 29, Primary Auxiliary Building Concrete Floor Plan at EL. 80'-0" B228653, Rev. 1, Replacement Boric Acid Transfer Pumps No. 21 & 22 9321-F-251 0, Rev. 49, Primary Auxiliary Building General Arrangement Plans SQUG (SEWS)AWC-022 C/6i~au Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19/2012 10/19/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-105 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN N[-] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 Photographs Note: View of pump Note: View of pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-106 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NR- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-025 Equipment ID No. 21BATP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP 21 Note: Anchor bolt at motor Note: Anchor bolts at motor EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-107 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 IP2 Status: YM NEI UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. O023CHP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Descrption NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NEI Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN ND] U-- N/A[--Y[ NEI UD- N/A[-]YEK NEI UD- N/ADl Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-108 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 1P2 Status: YN NiD U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. O023CHP E(Equipment Description NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant calculation IP-CALC-04-01180.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 5 YZ Nil U'] N/AD Y[ NEI U-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YjX ND uD- N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ ND UD-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry wall is qualified by Computech report R547.01.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YN NDI UD N/A[-D 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YfM ND uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-109 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 1P2 Status: YZ NiI UI-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. O023CHP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A207647, Rev 5, Hanger location, install of suction stabilizers and pulsation dampeners for charging pump 21,22 and 23 Calc no. IP-CALC-04-01180.

AWC-021 OrvgcIQ, "1QQýEvaluated by: Nick Cdspell Date: 10/19/2012

___________________________10/1912012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-110 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 1P2 Status: YN NE] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. O023CHP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description NO. 23 CHARGING PUMP Photographs Note: Note: View of pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-111 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 IP2 Status: YZ NEI UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-026 Equipment ID No. O023CHP Equipment Description NO, 23 CHARGING PUMP Equip. Class 1 5 Note: Ductwork above pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-112 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Note: Anchor bolt EN-DC-168 REVO0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-113 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 IP2 Status: YE NDI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YIZ NDl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YIZ NDJ Uil N/AD: Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-YER NDI UDI N/AD-' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-114 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 1P2 Status: YZ NE-] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NEI urI N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant drawings 9321-F-1167

& 932 1-F-1166.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YMI NEI U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y-- NO UW- N/Ar-Scaffold overhead is marked unsafe per scaffold tag 866B. It is not braced well in the east/west direction and would impact valve ifit collapses or sways during a seismic event. CR IP2-2012-06578 was issued to resolve.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEI UW- N/AW and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NWl UW N/A[--Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YWi N[ U[-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?No as scaffolding overtop of valve is likely to collapse onto valve during a seismic event.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-115 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 IP2 Status: YjZ NO] UL-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[l ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-1166, (A200106)

Rev 26, Primary Auxiliary building concrete, plans at elevation 15',35' & 42'.9321-F-1167,(A 200107), Rev 24, Primary Auxiliary building concrete plans at elevations 59', and 68'.AWC-019 qll)ý CX4ýau Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19/2012

'2 10/19/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-116 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YN NI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Descdption CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Photographs Note: Note: Scaffold over pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-117 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 IP2 Status: YZ NE] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Note: Scaffold over pump Note: Anchor bolt EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-118 of 434 ATTACHMEeT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-027 Equipment ID No. 21CSP Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 21 Status: YE] NE] UN Equip. Class 2 5 Note: Pump Note: Scafo 2 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-119 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YM N7j U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 21 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ N E-The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YZ NDI UD- N/A-]Y[ NEI UD] N/A[--D YE NDI uD- N/ADI EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-120 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YIZ NDI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 21 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO NDl U[I N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches the drawing A200106.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN NDI uD1 N/ADI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YMI NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall exists on west side of the RHR Pump 21.The wall is qualified per SQUG (SEWS)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN ND: UD N/AD Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NDI UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-121 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ Nr- UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could N[-- U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference Drawings & AWC A200106, Rev 26, Primary Auxiliary building, plan at elev. 15'-0" AWC-026 Evaluated by: Kirit Pankh Date: 10/23/2012 6N(4 exllýýNi...k ..Crisne.-10/23/2012 Nick Crisnell EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-122 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NEI U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 21 Photographs Note: Front view of the pump no 21 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-123 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-028 Equipment ID No. 21RHRP Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO.21 IP2 Status: YN NEI U-I Equip. Class 1 6 Note: Anchor Bolt of the pump.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-124 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NZJ UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 Location:

Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NO U-D N/A-YN ND U--I N/A-Y[ ND U- N/ADI EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-125 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEJ UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NEI Ur- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches the drawing A200106.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI ui-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NEI u[- N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall exists near the RHR Pump about 4' away. The wall is qualified per SQUG (SEWS)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI UD- N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI U[D of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-126 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NEI UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI- U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A200106, Rev 26, Auxiliary building, plan details at elev. 15'-0" SQUG (SEWS)A WC-027 Evaluated by: Kirit Pankh Date: 10/23/2012 q\JýC/r~Autn tII 10/23/2012 Nick cri-e//EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-127 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NE] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 Photographs Note: Fro Note: Anchor Bolts of the pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-128 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-029 Equipment ID No. O022RHRP Equipment Description RHR PUMP NO. 22 IP2 Status: Y[ Nn Ur-Equip. Class' 6 Note: Anchor Bolt view of the pump EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-129 of434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: YIM NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. O022SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification isrequired.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?2 of the anchor bolts are flush with the nuts. Judged acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YN NEI YIZ NEI] U[- N/Ar YZ NEI U[I N/AE]Minor surface rust. Judged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor is coated with approximately 2" of epoxy. Coating is flaking and chipping.

No significant cracking observed.1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NEI U[- N/A --EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-130 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: NE ] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. O022SWP Equip. Class' 6 Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NO- U-- N/A--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI uEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NEI U-- N/AL]Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN Nil Ur- N/AO-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Near by fence judged adequate for seismic loading by comparison to the wind loads.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y NEI UIE] .N/AI-]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UOL of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-131 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YI NE] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. O022SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIZ N[-] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings: SQUG (O022SWP)AWC-014 L1 Vpcfl Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-17-2012.L. ....Dan Nuta 10-17-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-132 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NE] U[]-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. O022SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP Photographs Note: Typical anchorage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-133 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-030 Equipment ID No. 0022SWP Equipment Description 22 SERVICE WATER PUMP IP2 Status: YN( NE] Ul-]Equip. Class' 6 Note: Typical anchorage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-134 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ N7II U7I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YER NEI Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NEI UD- N/AD-YN NEI UDl N/Ar-Minor surface corrosion.

Judged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor is coated with approximately 2 inches of epoxy coating. Epoxy coating is chipping, flaking, and has hairline cracks. No significant visible cracks to suggest concrete was cracked below epoxy. Judged acceptable.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NEI u-- N/A[-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-135 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YN ND I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP E(Equipment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SQUG (SEWS).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 6 YN NE] U[-] N/AEIi Y; NEI UD-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y N N N /AI N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NI U-I N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fence posts shows corrosion on baseplate.

Judged acceptable.

Fence post and baseplate judged adequate for seismic loading by comparison to the wind loads.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NDl UD] N/AD:]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI UDI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-136 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SE Sheet 3 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP Equipment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

EISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YN NOI- U[-]Equip. Class 1 6 YM NEI U[1 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No tag on the pump. CR IP2-2012-06546 issued to tag the pump.

References:

Drawings and AWC.Drawings:

A227488, Rev 2, Intake structure location of service water pipe welds.AWC-014 ,v;,vn rsfl5It EValUaLteU by.Dan Nuta j4S~Date: 10-17-2012 10-17-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-137 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 1P2 Status: YN NEI U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP Note: Typical anchor bolt.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev, 0, Page C-138 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NE-] UI--Equip. Class 1 6 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-031 Equipment ID No. O026SWP Equipment Description 26 SERVICE WATER PUMP Note: Typical anchor bolt.Note: Typical anchor bolt.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-139 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YM NO-I UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 Location:

Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Anchorage is to a steel pipe riser not to concrete.YN NE UE-- N/AEr-YN NE UEI N/AEl YE NE UI- N/AN I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-140 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ ND ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI NZ ULI N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[K NEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Ground wire conduit & pump power conduit close to pump flange.Acceptable given rigidity of pump and conduits.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead pipe near the roof line of the EDG building is supported on three wide flange columns. These columns are supported on baseplates with some nuts not fully engaged. Typical of all three baseplates.

LB-02 was performed to analyze the condition.

The high voltage transmission tower located east of the valve is judged by walk down team to be seismically acceptable compared to wind and icing loads.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.Y[ NDI U-' N/AD-1 YDI NO U0 N/AD-YN NDi UD1 N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-141 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ Nr- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE] U E]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE; NDl urI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cover plates on pump is missing 2 of 8 screws. Typical for both cover plates on pump. While seismically acceptable, new screws must be installed to prevent water intrusion.

See photo below. CR IP2-2012-06383 issued to track resolution.

Sealant on end of ground wire conduit for the Fuel Oil Transfer Pump D. G. 23 is not adequate to seal the conduit against water intrusion.

While this is not a seismic concem, the conduit should be properly sealed. CR IP2-2012-06383 issued to track resolution.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-22513(A-202024), Rev 9, Diesel generator building general arrangement elevations.

AWC-012 6 2 Af' Ck~g~Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-16-2012 Dan Nuta 10-16-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-142 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEIl UrL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equip. Class 1 6 Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 Photographs Note: Cover plate missing 2 of 8 scmws.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-143 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-032 Equipment ID No. O023FOTP Equipment Description FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP D.G. 23 IP2 Status: YE NM UEýEquip. Class' 6 Note: Insulation damaged on discharge from Fuel Oil Transfer Pump.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-144 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: NiL UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description AUXFEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 43'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and.findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YI- NZ The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Valve is in-line however the actuator has a spring can support, for which support was inspected.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete around floor penetration has about 6 cracks. They are thermal cracks. Judged accepable.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YN NEI uD- N/Ai-Y[ NDI U[7 N/AD7 YN NDJ UD N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-145 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NEI U[R Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NEIl U N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration venfication.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN Nil U[-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Y[ NOI UL-I N/AOl Y[ NEII uL N/AF]Y[ NEI Ui- N/AO YX NEI uO~EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-146 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NI] UF-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NI U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-2125, Rev 24, (A200450), Auxiliary feed pump building, turbine supply &exhaust piping plans and sections.9321-H-23613, Rev 0, Auxiliary building feed pump turbine steam supply equilizing lines around control valves PCV-1310A and PCV 1310-B AWC-010 quý4 C(aI Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-12-2012 1AW1-Cf#n 11. V',I 1z --10-12-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-147 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NRI U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Photographs Note: AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 22 TURB STEAMSUPPL Y SHUT-OFF VALVE Note: THE IN-LINE MOTOR OPERA TED VALVE, ACTUATOR HAS SPRING CAN SUPPORT EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-148 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YN N-] Ur-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Note: CONCRETE AROUND FLOOR PENETRATION HAS ABOUT 6 CRACKS. IT IS APEAR TO BE THERMAL CRACKS Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-149 of 434 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM ATTACHMEI Sheet I of NT9.6'4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 32-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI" NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Valve is in line. Actuator is supported on a spring can.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.YO NE] U[] N/A--YZ NEI u-- N/A[--YN NEI UD- N/A-'I Enter the equipment class name fi-om EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-150 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YN NI 1 UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NEI Ul N/AIZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YIZ NEI Uil potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NE] UE- N/AE]Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIN NE] U[] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate fiexibility to avoid damage? YM NEI UE-] N/A[]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[N NEI UE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-151 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUXFEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U E-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Fluorescent bulbs in area needs to be secured to light fixture by wires. Bulb falling would not pose a seismic operability issue for this component given location of bulbs and target. CR IP2-2012-06485 is issued to track resolution.

References:

Drawings and AWC.Drawings:

9321-L-60825, Rev 6, Pipe support details sht.26 9321-F-21253, (A201324)

Rev 13, Auxiliary feed pump building turbine supply and exhaust piping plans and sections.9321-H-23613, Rev 0, Auxiliary feed pump building turbine steam supply equalizing lines around control valves PCV 1310A and PCV 1310 B 9321-F-2125, (A200450,)

Rev 24, Auxiliary feed pump building turbine supply and exhaust piping plans and sections.AWC-009'1 \.kC~ ~Xk 1 ea2d Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/12/12 10/12/12 Stephen Yuan EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-152 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YN Nn] UL]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 22 TURB STEAM SUPPLY SHUT-OFF VALVE Photographs Note: PCV-1310B EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-153 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176 Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VLV Location:

Bldg. EDG Floor El. 67"-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YI-1 NM No anchorage check. In-line valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YEi NEI UD1 WNI Not applicable since it is an in-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y[7] ND UI- N/AN Not applicable since it is an in-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[I NEI uJ NWAN Not applicable since it is an in-line valve.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-154 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ NF-I U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176 Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VL V 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI- NEI U-I N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is an in-line valve.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS Nil UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NE] UE] N/AEJ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ] NE] U- N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Scaffolding nearby has been engineering evaluated per scaffolding tag signoffs.

Judged to be seismicly adequate.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE] U-- N/A--Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIE NEI UE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page 0-155 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ N[-I UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176 Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VLV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ Nil U[:]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Minor surface corrosion observed in valves, pipes, and steel components.

Judged acceptable.

References:

9321-F-2257, Rev 47, (A200600), Diesel generator building cooling water piping river water system.9321-F-2722, Rev 126, Flow diagram service water system nuclear steam supply.Vendor drawing no. R-000853-1, Rev C AWC-011 qAAQ CX(keýQ Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-16-2012 A10-16-2012 Stephen Yuan-;:&ý ý- o),ýLýDan Nuta 10-16-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-156 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NEI U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176 Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VLV Photographs Note: Jacket water cooler return flow control valve.Note: Jacket water cooler return flow control valve.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-157 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NEIL ULE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VL V Location:

Bldg. EDG Floor El. 67'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-I NO No anchorage check. The valve is a in-line valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YWI NO U- N/A[No anchorage check. The valve is a in-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YOl NO Ell WA]N/No anchorage check. The valve is a in-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YOl NEI uL] N/AZ No anchorage check. The valve is a in-line valve.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-158 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[Z NOI- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176A E(Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VLV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is an in-line valve.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 7 YDI NDI UE- N/AI2 Y[ NE-I U -Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN NDI UE N/AF-D 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND:] U0 N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Scafolding nearby has been engineenng evaluated per scaffolding tag signoffs.

Judged to be seismicly adequate.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ ND] UD] N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIZ N[D] UD-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-159 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YM NEZI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VL V Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[E Nil u-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Minor surface corrosion observed in valves, pipes, and steel components.

Judged acceptable.

References:

9321-F-2257, Rev 47, (A200600), Diesel generator building cooling water piping river water system.9321-F-2722, Rev 126, Flow diagram service watersystem nuclearsteam supply.Vendor drawing no.R-000853-1 Rev C.AWC-011 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-16-2012 Stephen Yuan 10-16-2012 Dan Nuta 10-16-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-160 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. FCV-1176A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description JACKET WTR COOLER RET FLOW CTRL VLV Photographs Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-161 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE NI- U--SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINEISO VLV Location:

Bldg. PPEN & MEZZ Floor El. 51'-0" & 67'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YZ NEI The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The Valve is a motor operated valve. The motor operator is anchored on floor elevation 67'6" and the valve is on elevation 51'. Both motor operator and valve were inspected for this component.

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YN NE] U-- N/AL]YO NOI UL N/AD--Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-162 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YN ND ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YIZ ND] UEl N/AD anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NDI UD-] N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration matches drawings A208690-4 Rev 04, 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[R ND-] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or stnictures.

YZ NDI UD-- N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDl UD1 N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI uD- N/A[D]Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-163 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ Ni Ut]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[-] U[:-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A208690 Rev 04, Addition of Motor Operators for valves No's. 205, 958, 869 A&B, 250 A, B, C, & D.02-403-0012, Rev. 3, Motor Operations for Cont. Isol Valves M.O. For Valves 250A-D, 205.SQUG (SEWS)AWC-028, and AWC-029 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/24/2012 qýýNick Crisnefl 10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-164 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NE] UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 RCP SEALINJ LINE ISO VLV Photographs Note: Valve anchorage at elevation 67'Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-165 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-038 Equipment ID No. 250A Equip.Equipment Description 21 RCP SEAL/NJ LINE ISO VLV IP2 Status: YM NI- UMI Class 1 8 Note: Valve overhead area Note: Area around the valve EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-166 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YN ND UFl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. SWN-51-1A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE Location:

Bldg. MEZZ Floor El. 67'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[Z NEl The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild corrosion both on plate and the anchor bolts. Judged not to be a seismic concern.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NF UI- N/AD YE NEI U[- N/AD YZ N[-] UL-] N/AE Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-167 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP2 Status: YE NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. SWN-51-1A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NO U- N/Al](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration matches drawing A208160-12-SR 1A Rev 0..6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

YEDNO U0 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NO UMI N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE Ui N/A[E and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE UI- N/All Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-168 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YI NEI- UZI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. SWN-51-IA Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEIl Ul adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A208160, Rev. 04, Arrg't of Motor Operated Valves in Service Water Sample Lines to Radiation Monitor 12-SR-51-1A, Rev 0, Support AWC-028 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/24/2012 Nick Crispell 10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-169 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 1P2 Status: YO NO UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. SWN-51-1A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 21 FCU OUTLET SAMPLE ISO VALVE Photographs Note: Note: Corrosion on the plate EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-170 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YN NIl ULI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. 1870 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE Location:

Bldg. PPEN & MEZZ Floor El. 51'-0"& 67'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ N['-The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Valve is in line with a motor operator.

Valve is on elevation 51' and motor operator for valve is anchored to the 67'6" floor.Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Mild surface rust, acceptable, no seismic concems.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NEI U-I N/A[-]YN NE] UIl NIAr-Y[K NEIl url N/AD Inline valve is not anchored into the concrete; anchorage is on elevation 67' for motor operator.Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, AppendLx B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-171 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YN N[-D UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. 1870 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NDI UI- N/Ali (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration matches drawing B-227173-0 Rev 0, &B229713-1 Rev 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi ui-l potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[I ND-I U[:I N/A[:]Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NDI Ui:I N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI NDI UD- N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-172 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI UL]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. 1870 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UL-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

B-227173 Rev 0, Installation of motor operators for valves no. 743 & 1870, B229713 Rev 1.Mounting details for RHR mini flow line MOVs 743 and 1870 for install of Redundant indication system, AWC-029 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/24/2012 Nick Cdsnrell r 614?ý10/24/2012 Nick Crisneft EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-173 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YX NOI- UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-040 Equipment ID No. 1870 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINI FLOW TEST LINE VALVE Photographs No picture possible of component due to the procedurally required camera stand off distance.Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-174 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YN ND U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. 4928 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 51'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration venfication is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y-I NONEI U-I N/AD3 YZ NEI U[- N/AD-YO NEI U-I N/ADl Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-175 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YN ND 1 ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. 4928 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[--I NW0 UW- N/A[R (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED NEI uWI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN NEI U-- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NWI U N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI U-- N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YX NEI uW-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-176 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NI I UD-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. 4928 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Engineering approved long term scaffolding built around the area is judged seismicly adequate.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

A208080 Rev 06, Alternate reactor coolant pump seal injection system A228177 Rev 01, Diag of conn's for post accident M.O. V.'s 850B, 250A, 250B, 869A, 4926, 870, 4928, 958.AWC-029 p-p Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/24/2012 q1A A4,9 CX4~1~au A1I,11l,, t 11o~ l 10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-1 77 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NO] Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. 4928 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 24 RCP SEAL INJ LINE ISO VLV Photographs Note: Valve 4928 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-178 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YIN NO- U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE Location:

Bldg. PPEN Floor El. 51'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yr-] N [of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YZ NEI UD1 N/AD1 Valve is in-line, motor operator is supported.

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YIN NE] UEi N/AL]oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[K NDI UD- N/AD1 anchors?Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-179 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YI NM UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YDi NFD UD N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YIZ ND] UDE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NEi U-l N/AF-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NDI UI N/A[--and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NDI U[- N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIZ NDI UD'of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-180 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NiD UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC 9321 -F-2 736, Rev 129, Flow diagram chemical & volume control system.AWC-029 Evaluated by: Kirit Padkh Date: 10/24/2012 qv(A Nk~k Cri'~npII 10/24/2012 Nick Crisne#EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-181 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: NE]- OUL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE Photographs Note: Valve structure from comer Note: Valve structure and associated commodities EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-182 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. HCV-142(MOV227)

Equipment Description BYPASS CHANNEL FLOW TO RCS VALVE Status: YO NO- ULI]Equip. Class 1 8 Note: Anchorage o concrete wall Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-183 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE NE] Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Location:

Bldg. AF Floor El. 77'-4" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN N IE Y[ NEI uL- N/A[YE NEI UE- N/AEi-YE] NE] UD N/A[Z Not applicable since the anchorage is attached to steel plate.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-184 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NI UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MS/V SOV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NEI UD- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing A227166-3.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI uDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NDl UD:] N/AD-I Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UDl N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YZ NDI UD- N/ADl YN NDI UD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-185 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NO UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG 21 MSIV SOV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NE] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC 1. Dwg A227166, Rev 3, Replacement of main steam isolation valve solenoids. (Con Ed) drawing 2. Dwg D227176, Rev 0 (Con Ed) drawing 3. AWC-036_ ___ Date: 10/25/2012 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan 10/25/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0