ML24029A017
ML24029A017 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 01/30/2024 |
From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
To: | |
References | |
RG-1.183, Rev 1 | |
Download: ML24029A017 (6) | |
Text
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting Summary
Title:
NRC Hybrid Workshop (1 of 3) - Update to RG 1.183, Revision 1, "Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors"
Meeting Identifier: 20231392
Date of Meeting: January 9, 2024
Location: Hybrid (NRC Headquarters, Rockville, MD and via Microsoft Team s)
Type of Meeting: Comment Gathering Public Meeting
Purpose of Meeting: This was the first of 3 workshops the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is hosting in early 2024 to discuss a revision to RG 1.183, Revision 1 (https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2308/ML23082A305.pdf ). These workshops will provide opportunities for NRC staff and stakeholders to discuss updates to extend the applicability of the guidance to higher burnup and increased enrichment fuel applica tions, in support of the NRCs Increased Enrichment Rulemaking ( https://www.regulations.gov/document/NRC-2020-0034-0005), and to consider other feedback that is relevant to the guida nce. The workshops allow for the NRCs external stakeholders to participate in the regulatory process through a comment gathering format as described in the NRCs policy statement on public meetings at 86 FR 14964. The staff will collect comments and input through note-t aking and will consider this information while drafting updates to guidance.
Related Documents:
- ML23346A110 - High Burnup Fuel Source Term Accident Analysis Boiling-Water Reactor Follow-On Calculations, November 16, 2023 (Presentation by NRC Staff to ACRS Subcommittee on Radiation Protection and Nuclear Materials)
- ML23346A111 - High Burnup Fuel Accident Source Terms, November 16, 2023 (Presentation by Sandia National Laboratories to ACRS Subcommittee on Radiation Protection and Nuclear Materials)
- ML24005A107 - RG 1-183 Public Workshop (1 of 3) NRC & SNL Presentation Material
- ML23082A305 - Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.183, Revision 1, Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors
- ML23352A393 - Transcript of Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards - Radiation Protection and Nuclear Materials Subcommittee Meeting, November 16, 2023, Pages 1-259 (Open)
- ML24008A044 - NEI - Slides for NRC Workshop 1 on Revision to RG 1.183 R1 - Final -
- ML24008A156 - 01/09/2024 NRC Hybrid Workshop (1 of 3) - Update to RG 1.183, Revision 1, "Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors"
1 ADAMS Accession No. ML24029A017 Summary:
On January 9, 2024, the NRC staff held a workshop, formally kno wn as a comment gathering public meeting, to discuss the revision of Regulatory Guide (RG ) 1.183, Revision 1, Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at Ac cession No.
ML23082A305. This workshop includ ed presentations by the NRC staff and representatives from Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), the Nuclear Energy Ins titute (NEI) and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).The meeting provided an opportu nity for NRC staff to discuss updates to extend the applicability of RG 1.183 to higher burnu p and increased enrichment fuel applications, in support of the NRCs Increased Enrichment Rule making (https://regulations.gov under docket NRC-2020-0034), and to consider other feedback t hat is relevant to the guidance contained in the RG. The meeting notice is available at ADAMS A ccession No. ML24008A156.
The NRC, SNL and industry meeting slides are available at ADAMS Accession Nos.
ML24005A107 and ML24008A044, respectively.
Michael X. Franovich, Director of the Division of Risk Assessme nt in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), made opening remarks. Following the o pening remarks, as required by the Commissions Policy Statement on Public Meetings (86 FR 14964), the staff described methods that stakeholders can use to provide input and feedback to the NRC and the staff clarified that comments regarding the NRCs Increased Enrichmen t Rulemaking should be submitted through the https://regulations.gov website under docket ID NRC-2020-0034.
The first presentation given by N RC staff provided an overview of the plan to update RG 1.183 and a review of the purposes of RGs, how they are maintained an d the process the staff follows for updating RGs. In discussing the background of RGs, the staf f stated that RGs are used to assist stakeholders in understanding and complying with NRC rul es and regulations and that they conserve licensee and NRC resources by simplifying the lic ensing process by describing methods the staff has predetermined to be acceptable to meeting regulations. Thus, RGs relieve applicants and licensees of the burden of demonstrating that ap proved methods satisfy applicable NRC requirements. The process to update RGs is descr ibed in Management Directive 6.6, Regulatory Guides, ADAMS Accession No. ML22010 A233, and includes significant internal staff effort in developing new guidance an d attendant technical bases; external interactions, includi ng public comment periods; and, if necessary, briefings to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS). During this pr esentation, the staff reviewed the process to withdraw a RG in cases when the guidanc e in a RG has been relocated to another document, or if the staff concludes that the guidanc e in a RG is no longer an acceptable means of complying with applicable requirements.
The staff then listed three main reasons for updating RG 1.183, Revision 1: (1) to provide guidance that is applicable for fuel burnups greater than 68 GW d/MTU; (2) to develop guidance to implement certain Increased Enrichment Rulemaking decisions, as necessary; and (3) to consider other improvements to the guidance, in particular ones that optimize conservatisms in methods approved by the staff. The staff completed the first pr esentation by reviewing the current project schedule, which includes a total of five public meetings from January 2024 through April 2024, and a briefing to the ACRS in the fall of 2 024. The project plan aims toward submitting the Draft Guide (DG) to the Commission in December 2 024, in conjunction with the Increased Enrichment Rulemaking SECY forwarding the proposed ru le for Commission vote.
The second presentation was provided by SNL. This presentation reviewed the content in Sandia Report No. 2023-01313, High Burnup Fuel Source Term Acc ident Sequence Analysis.
2 ADAMS Accession No. ML24029A017 In summary, SNL found that increased burnup or extended enrichm ent does not significantly impact the source term, but that the most significant change in the source term comes from improvement in the modeling of best practices (e.g., from the S OARCA, post-Fukushima studies) and supported by experimental observations (e.g., PHEB US). These studies suggest a greater prevalence of low-pressure scenarios that can lead to h igher radiological releases to containment during the in-vessel phase. Lastly, SNL highlighted that for boiling water reactors, retention in the suppression pool can have a significant effect on the containment source term.
This presentation was abridged from a more detailed presentatio n that was provided to the ACRS on November 16, 2023. The ACRS meeting transcript is avail able at ADAMS Accession No. ML23352A393.
The third presentation was provided by the NRC staff. This pres entation reviewed follow-on calculations that the staff has been considering with regards t o a pathway-specific source term in boiling water reactors. The staff described how modeling of the main steam lines was refined in these calculations to provide better estimation of the distr ibution of fission products. The staff presented preliminary source term inventory fractions for the e arly in-vessel accident phase at a boiling water reactor, broken down by radionuclide chemical gro uping (e.g., noble gases, halogens, alkali metals) and release pathway (i.e., suppression pool, containment and steam line). These results indicate that a pathway specific source te rm may be a reasonable approach to account for the impact of the suppression pool both in conta inment and the main steam line.
Meeting participants expressed a significant amount of interest in these calculations and several questions on this topic were fiel ded by NRC staff. NRC staff mentioned that this methodology will be described in a report that will be published in Summer 2024.
The last presentation provided the nuclear industrys initial p erspective on the effort to update RG 1.183, Revision1 and was or ganized by NEI; however, remarks were delivered by industry representatives, including members of utilities, EPRI and a con sultant. Presenters emphasized that open and transparent dialog is critical to identify and re solve key technical issues that pertain to the RG. Industry representatives recognized that man y power reactor licensees will be challenged to implement high burnup and increased enrichment fuels because of source term modeling used in Sandia Report No. 2023-01313. Presenters observed that the SNL report shows that increased burnup and enrichment does not strongly im pact in-containment source term and that suppression pool scrubbing is prevalent during bo iling water reactor accident progressionsignificantly reducing the non-noble gas activity c omponent of the in-containment source term. Therefore, presenters requested that staff conside r establishing methods for crediting suppression pool scrubbing in design basis accident a nalyses.
Additionally, industry representatives requested that the staff consider how additional safety equipment, such as Station Blackout and Advanced Accident Mitig ation (B.5.b) and Flex equipment, as well as updated risk insights can be applied to d esign basis accident analyses; how other changes (e.g., particulate deposition in main steam l ines, statistical approaches to dose calculations and cases where the guidance drives users to assume airborne and water releases that are more than core inventory) can improve realism and facilitate implementation of the guidance in the RG; and if the staff can provide assurance of the continued acceptance of earlier revisions of the RG. Finally, industry representatives provided some insights into research that EPRI may be conducting on behalf of the industry to inform applications of severe accident scenarios.
3 ADAMS Accession No. ML24029A017 Michael Franovich, Director of the Division of Risk Assessment in NRR provided closing remarks.
No regulatory decisions were made during the meeting.
4 ADAMS Accession No. ML24029A017 List of Attendees
January 9, 2024, Public Meeting NRC Hybrid Workshop (1 of 3) - Update to RG 1.183, Revision 1, "Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluati ng Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors"
Name Affiliation Name Affiliation C A Self David Kortge Constellation Birol Aktas Southern Nuclear Sam Lafountain SNC Company Jill Anderson APS Leigh Lloveras Breakthrough Institute Dever Atwood BWROG Chair Rick Loeffler Xcel Energy Uriel Bachrach Westinghouse Peter Lowry PNNL Steve Baker Baker Consulting David Luxat Sandia National Services Laboratories Philip Benavides NRC Edwin Lyman UCS Jana Bergman CurtissWright/Scientech Kevin Lynn NuScale Andrew Bielen NRC Alex Markivich Dominion Energy Dwayne Blaylock Enercon Services Inc. Don Marksberry NRC Mark Blumberg NRC Richard McCarty Nuclear Utility Group on Equipment Qualification (NUGEQ)
Francis Bolger EPRI Dave McIntyre NRC Butch Bornt Southern Nuclear Sean Meighan NRC Jan Bostelman Self Joseph Messina NRC Andrew Bowman Westinghouse Electric Brian Mount Dominion Energy Company Eric Bowman NRC Carole Naugle Framatome Greg Broadbent Consultant Matthew Nudi EPRI Kristy Bucholtz NRC Donald Palmrose NRC Scott Burnell NRC John Palsmeier NuScale Power Justin Byard Dominion Energy John Parillo NRC Shawn Campbell NRC Frances Pimentel NEI Johnathan Chavers Southern Company Doug Pollock TVA Rob Choromokos EPRI Steven Pope ISL, Inc.
Paul Clifford Framatome Blake Purnell NRC Price Collins Duke Energy William Rautzen NRC Phil Couture Entergy MJ Ross-Lee NRC Aladar Csontos NEI Michael Salay NRC Kristopher Cummings NuScale Power Baris Sarikaya Constellation Steven Dolley S&P Global Platts Raymond Schneider Westinghouse Hossein Esmaili NRC Harold Scott Self
5 ADAMS Accession No. ML24029A017 List of Attendees
January 9, 2024, Public Meeting NRC Hybrid Workshop (1 of 3) - Update to RG 1.183, Revision 1, "Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluati ng Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors"
Name Affiliation Name Affiliation Mike Eudy NRC Melissa Shahzadeh Council of State Governments -
Midwest Fernando Ferrante EPRI Carlos Sisco Winston & Strawn John Fisher Energy Northwest Scott Stanchfield Entergy Michael Franovich NRC Christopher Staum Constellation Shane Gardner GE Hitachi Nuclear James Stavely PSEG Nuclear Steven Garry NRC Charles Stroupe Duke Energy William Gassmann Constellation Christie Taylor Duke Energy Lisa Gerken Framatome Brian Timm Duke Energy Alex Gilbreath SNC Nadejda Todorova Constellation Zachary Gran NRC Christopher Van NRC Wert Paul Guinn NuScale Power Storm NRC Veunephachan Nathaniel Hall STPNOC Kim Webber NRC Michelle Hart NRC Sunil Weerakkody NRC David Hindera GE Hitachi Lewis Wells Constellation Kevin Hsueh NRC Albert Widmer Energy Harbor Harley Hutchins Self Zhe Yuan NRC Caryl Ingram Duke Energy Corp Andrew Zach Senate Randy Jacobs GEH Steve Jones NRC Meena Khanna NRC Tom Kindred SNC Daniel King NRC Audrey Klett NRC Jeffrey Kobelak Westinghouse
6 ADAMS Accession No. ML24029A017