|
---|
Category:GRANTS OF EXEMPTION FROM & EXTENSION TO NRC REQUIREME
MONTHYEARML20247H8981998-05-0707 May 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.J for Emergency Lighting at Point Beach Nuclear Plant ML20211L5921997-10-0606 October 1997 Exemption from 10CFR70.24,which Requires That Each Licensee Authorized to Possess Special Nuclear Matl Shall Maintain Criticality Accident Monitoring Sys in Each Area Where Such Matl Handled,Used or Stored.Commission Grants Exemption ML20134B7371997-01-27027 January 1997 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 to Determine That Setpoint for LTOP Events Will Not Present Undue Risk to Public & Safety.Exemption Granted ML20095K0531995-11-28028 November 1995 Exemption from Requirements of App E of 10CFR50,allowing one-time Exemption from Annual Emergency Plan Exercise Requirement ML20070F7501991-03-0505 March 1991 Exemption from 10CFR55.45(b)(2)(iii) to Permit Submittal of Simulation Facility Certification After 910326 Deadline in Rule But No Later than 910724 ML20236A3081989-03-0808 March 1989 Exemption from 10CFR50,App K Re Injection of Low Pressure ECCS Into Upper Plenum of Reactor in Event of LOCA ML20212F3581986-12-31031 December 1986 Exemption to 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Fire Protection Requirements,Per Licensee 830428 Request,As Supplemented by 831026,851211,860509 & 1010 Ltrs & Encl Franklin Research Ctr Technical Evaluation Rept ML20129J0531985-07-0303 July 1985 Exemption from 10CFR50,App R,Subsection Iii.G Re Requirements for Fire Protection of Safe Shutdown Capability ML20023C1441983-04-28028 April 1983 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Re Fixed Fire Suppression Sys in Control Room ML20028F5741983-01-25025 January 1983 Exemption from 10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii) Schedular Requirements Re RCS High Point Gas Vent Installation ML20027D5471982-10-0707 October 1982 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50 App E,Section IV.F.1 Re Emergency Preparedness Exercises 1998-05-07
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20247H8981998-05-0707 May 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.J for Emergency Lighting at Point Beach Nuclear Plant ML20211L5921997-10-0606 October 1997 Exemption from 10CFR70.24,which Requires That Each Licensee Authorized to Possess Special Nuclear Matl Shall Maintain Criticality Accident Monitoring Sys in Each Area Where Such Matl Handled,Used or Stored.Commission Grants Exemption NPL-97-0357, Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems1997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems DD-97-15, Directors Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request1997-06-18018 June 1997 Directors Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request ML20141B0451997-06-0909 June 1997 Requests Extension of Comment Period for NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20198R1511997-03-0505 March 1997 Transcript of 970305 OI Interview of Aj Cayia in Two Rivers, Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-70 ML20198R1281997-03-0404 March 1997 Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of T Malanowski in Two Rivers,Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-28 ML20198R1361997-03-0404 March 1997 Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of DF Johnson in Two Rivers,Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-37 ML20198R0931997-03-0404 March 1997 Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of Rj Harvey in Two Rivers,Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-28. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198R1111997-03-0404 March 1997 Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of E Ziller in Two Rivers, Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-33.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20134B7371997-01-27027 January 1997 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 to Determine That Setpoint for LTOP Events Will Not Present Undue Risk to Public & Safety.Exemption Granted ML20095K0531995-11-28028 November 1995 Exemption from Requirements of App E of 10CFR50,allowing one-time Exemption from Annual Emergency Plan Exercise Requirement NPL-95-0321, Comment on Proposed 10CFR50.54(p) Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Supports Proposed Clarification of Language in 10CFR50.54(p)1995-07-11011 July 1995 Comment on Proposed 10CFR50.54(p) Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Supports Proposed Clarification of Language in 10CFR50.54(p) ML20085E6541995-06-13013 June 1995 Comment Re Draft NUREG/BR-0199, Responsiveness to Public. Expresses Concern on Dry Cask Storage W/Exemption Given to VSC-24 Cask & Procedures for Unloading & Transport at Plant ML20078F4831994-12-20020 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & low-power Operations for Np Reactors.Informs That Util of Belief That NRC Already Has Appropriate Regulatory Authority Over Shutdown & low-power Operations,As Provided in Maint Rule ML20077E8361994-12-0101 December 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low- Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20059E9331993-10-27027 October 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR171 Re Restoration of Generic Exemption from Annual Fees for Nonprofit Educational Institutions ML20045D7331993-06-13013 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Recommends That NRC re-evaluate Proposed Testing Frequency Due to Random Testing Rate of 50% Sufficient to Provide Continued Detection Effectiveness ML20127D7191992-09-0606 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127D6371992-09-0303 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule & Urges NRC to Extend Comment Period in Order for Concerned Citizens to Prepare Thorough List of Objections ML20114D2591992-08-24024 August 1992 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Proposal to Store Spent Nuclear Fuel in VSC-24 Storage Casks at Plant in State of Wi ML20073N1141991-05-10010 May 1991 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery ML20070F7501991-03-0505 March 1991 Exemption from 10CFR55.45(b)(2)(iii) to Permit Submittal of Simulation Facility Certification After 910326 Deadline in Rule But No Later than 910724 ML20058D4831990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20236A3081989-03-0808 March 1989 Exemption from 10CFR50,App K Re Injection of Low Pressure ECCS Into Upper Plenum of Reactor in Event of LOCA ML20235S8381989-02-22022 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degree Requirement for Senior Reactor Operator (Sro).Unless Grandfathered in Next 4-5 Yrs Author to Be Locked Out of Job & Does Not Intend Spending 20 Plus Yrs as Reactor Operator ML20235N8341989-02-17017 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20148K5591988-03-18018 March 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50,App J Re Mass Point Method of Data Analysis.Recommends Test Duration Criteria in ANSI/ANS-56.8-1987,Section 5.4 Be Accepted in Revised Regulations ML20236Q7991987-11-0909 November 1987 Comments on Proposed Rev 2 to Reg Guide 1.100 Re Seismic Qualification of Electrical & Mechanical Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V8231987-10-13013 October 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Based on Violations Noted During Special Physical Security Insp on 860718-0807 ML20212F3581986-12-31031 December 1986 Exemption to 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Fire Protection Requirements,Per Licensee 830428 Request,As Supplemented by 831026,851211,860509 & 1010 Ltrs & Encl Franklin Research Ctr Technical Evaluation Rept ML20136E0511985-11-20020 November 1985 Memorandum & Order Granting Licensee 850826 Request for Extension of Deadline for Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment to 860525 for Unit 1 & 851231 for Unit 2.Served on 851120 ML20137C8601985-11-19019 November 1985 Transcript of Commission 851119 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote in Washington,Dc Re SECY-330(a) on Point Beach & SECY-225(a) on Sequoyah.Pp 1-5 ML20138M8711985-10-25025 October 1985 Transcript of 851025 Meeting in Washington,Dc Re Util Requests for Exemption from Environ Qualification.Pp 1-76 ML20129J0531985-07-0303 July 1985 Exemption from 10CFR50,App R,Subsection Iii.G Re Requirements for Fire Protection of Safe Shutdown Capability ML20078L1661983-10-17017 October 1983 Response Opposing Wisconsin Environ Decade 830923 Petition for Review of ALAB-739 Re Steam Generator Tubes Repaired by Sleeving.Nexus Between Sleeving & Tube Failure Shown. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078C8801983-09-23023 September 1983 Petition for Review of Aslab 830907 Decision on Sleeving Degraded Steam Generator Tubes.Aslab Erroneously Denied Nexus Shown Between Sleeving & Tube Failure.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20024F2901983-09-0707 September 1983 Decision ALAB-739,affirming ASLB 830204 Initial Decision LBP-83-4,authorizing Issuance of OL Amend to Allow Repair of Degraded Steam Generator Tubes by Sleeving.Wisconsin Environ Decade Failed to Link Sleeving to Tube Failures ML20024F0001983-09-0606 September 1983 Order Extending Time Until 830921 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-719 ML20076E1581983-08-22022 August 1983 Response Opposing Wisconsin Environ Decade 830811 Request to Respond to Hf Conrad Affidavit.Aslab Affirmed Dismissal of Decade Petition to Intervene.Decade Thus Lacks Party Standing.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20024E3031983-08-0808 August 1983 Order Extending Time Until 830906 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-719 ML20024D2151983-07-29029 July 1983 Affidavit of Hf Conrad in Response to Aslab Request Re NRC Assessment of Eddy Current Testing Techniques on Steam Generator Tubes in Transition Region.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20024C3551983-07-0808 July 1983 Memorandum & Order Requesting NRC Assessment of Eddy Current Testing Techniques to Ensure Early Detection & Repair of Significant Degradation ML20024C3981983-07-0808 July 1983 Order Extending Time Until 830807 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-719 ML20204G3481983-04-29029 April 1983 Brief Opposing Wisconsin Environ Decade Exceptions to ASLB 830204 Initial Decision Authorizing full-scale Sleeving. Exceptions Waived for Failure to Brief or Arguments W/O Merits ML20023C1441983-04-28028 April 1983 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Re Fixed Fire Suppression Sys in Control Room ML20069K5951983-04-22022 April 1983 Answer Opposing Wisconsin Environ Decade 820407 Petition for Review of ALAB-719 Which Affirmed ASLB 821210 Special Prehearing Conference Order Dismissing Petition to Intervene.Matter Raised Not Reviewable.W/Certificate of Svc ML20073D6991983-04-11011 April 1983 Request for Extension Until 830427 to File Opposition to Wisconsin Environ Decade Brief on Exceptions.Counsel Has Numerous Obligations Before ASLB & Aslab.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073B9701983-04-0707 April 1983 Petition for Review of Aslab 830322 Decision Denying Wisconsin Environ Decade 821220 Appeal of ASLB 821210 Prehearing Conference Order.Hearing on Steam Generator Tube Degradation Issue Should Be Held.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069F6491983-03-16016 March 1983 Brief Supporting Wi Environ Decade 830211 Exceptions to ASLB Initial Decision.Aslb Refused to Make Prerequisite Findings on Degree of Assurance Necessary to Protect Public Safety. Affidavit of Mailing Encl 1998-05-07
[Table view] |
Text
.
d 7590-01-P UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ln the Matter of
)
)
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY )
Docket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301
-)
(Point Beach Nuclear Plant,
)
Unit Nos.1 and 2)
)
EXEMPTION 1.
Wisconsin Electric Power Company (the licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR 27, which authorize operation of the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The licenses provide, among other things, that the licensee is subject to ali rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in
- effect.
The facility consists of two pressurized-water reactors located at the licensee's site in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin.
II.
-The Code of Federal Regulations at 10 CFR 70.24," Criticality Accident Requirements," requires that each licensee authorized to possess special nuclear material shall maintain a criticality accident monitoring system in each area where such material is handled, used, or stored. Subsection a(2) of 10 CFR 70.24 specifies detection and sensitivity requirements that these monitors must meet. Subsection a(2) also specifies that all areas subject to criticality accident monitoring must be covered by monitoring devices.
9710100259 971006 PDR ADOCK 05000266 P
PDR
.J
2-Subsection (a)(3) of 10 CFR 70.24 requires licensees to maintain emergency procedures for each area in which this licensed special nuclear material is handled, used, or stored and provides (1) that the prov;dures ensure that all personnel withdraw to an area of safety upon the sounding of a criticality accident monitor alarm, (2) that the procedures must include drills to familiarize personnel with the evacuation plan, and (3) that the proceduras designate responsible individuals for determining the cause of the alarm and placement of radiation survey instruments in accessible le cations for use in such an emergency.
Subsection (b)(1) of 10 CFR 70.24 requires licensees to have a means to identify quickly personnel who have received a dose of 10 rads or more. Subsection (b)(2) of 10 CFR 70.24 requires licensees to maintain personnel decontamination facilities, to maintain arrangements for a physician and other medical personnel qualified to handle radiation emergencies, and to maintain arrangements for the transportation of contaminated individuals to treatment facilities outside the site boundary. Subsection (c) of 10 CFR 70.24 exempts I art 50 licensees from the requirements of subsection (b) of 10 CFR 70.24 for special nucle ~ material used or to be used in the reactor. Subsection (d) of 10 CFR 70.24 states that any licensee who believes that there is good cause why he should be granted an exemption from all or part of 10 CFR 70.24 may apply to tha Commission for such an exemotion and shall specify the reasons for the relief requested.
Ill.
The special nuclear material that could be assembled into a critical mass at Point Beach Nuclear Plant is in the form of nuclear fuel; the quantity of special nuclear material other than fuel that is stored on site is small enough to preclude achieving a critical mass.
The Commission technical staff has evaluM: d the possibility of an inadvertent criticality of tne
. nuclear fuel at Point Beach Nuclear Plant and has determined that such an accident cannot occur if the licensee meets the following seven criteria:
1.
Only one new fuel assembly is allowed out of a shipping cask or storage rack at one time.
2.
The k-effective does not exceed 0.95, at a 95% probability, 95% confidence level in the event that the fresh fuel storage racks are filled with fuel of the maximum permissible U-235 enrichment and flooded with pure water.
3.
If optimum moderation occurs at low moderator density, then the k-effective does not exceed 0.98, at a 95% probability, 95% confidence level in the event that the fresh fuel storage racks are fded with fuel of the maximum permissible U-235 enrichment and flooded with moderator at the density corresponding to optimum moderation.
4.
The k-effective does not exceed 0.95, at a 95% probability, 95% confidence level in the event that the spent fuel storage racks are filled with fuel of the maximum permissible U-235 enrichment and flooded with pure water.
5.
The quantity of forms of special nuclear material, other than nuclear fuel, that are stored on site in any given area is less than the quantity necessary for a critical mass.
6.
Radiation monitors, as required by Point Beach Nuclear Plant General Design Cnterion 18 which is analogous to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, General Design Criterion 63, are provided in fuel storage and handling areas to detect excessive radiation levels and to initiate appropriate safety actions.
7.
The maximum nominal U-235 enrichment is limited to 5 weight percent.
By letter dated June 7,1997, Wisconsin Electric Power Company requested an exemption from 10 CFR 70.24. In this exemption request the licensee addressed the seven Jteria given above. The Commission technical staff has reviewed the licensee's submittal
___ a
4 and has determined that Point P.,each Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, meets the criteria for prevention of inadvertent criticality; therefore, the staff has determined that it is extremely unlikely for an inadvertent criticality to occur in special nuclear materials handling or storage areas at Point Beach Nuclear Plant.
The purpose of the criticality monitors required by 10 CFR 70.24 is to ensure that, if a criticality were to occur during the handling of special nuclear material, personnel would be alerted to that fact and would take appropriate action. The staff has determined that it is extremely unlikely that such an accident could occur; furthermore, the licensee has radiation morstors, as rsquired by Point Beach Nuclear Plant's General Design Criterion 18, in fuel storage and handling areas. Specifically, Point Beach Nuclear Plant's General Design Criterion 18 requires " Monitoring and alarm instrumentation shall be provided for fuel and waste storage and associated handling areas for conditions that might result in loss of capability to remove dece'/ heat and to detect excessive radiation levels." These monitors will alert personnel to excessive radiation levels and allow them to initiate appropriate safety actions. The low probability of an inadvertent criticality together with the licensee's adherence to Point Beach Nuclear Plant's General Design Criterion 18 constitute qood cause for granting an exemption to the requirements of 10 CFR 70.24.
IV.
The Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 70.14, this exemption is authorized by law, will not endsger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the Wisconsin Electric Power Corapany an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 70.24 for the Point E;ach Nuclear Plant.
e
.. Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the granting of this exemption will have no significant impact on the quality of the human environment (62 FR 45883).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of October 1997.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS;ON Originalsignedy SamuelJ.Colfrns Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DOCUMENT NAME: G:iWPDOCS\\PTBEACH\\PTB98973.EXE T3 receive a copy of this document. Ind6cate in the box: *C"
- Copy without attachment / enclosure "E* = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N"
OFHCE PM:PD31 E
LA:PD31 E
C:SRXB OGC D:PD31 (A)D:
E AD:NRR p)l (RB/
s
@l fiA 6)
Al
.M1, DR 8
(
/\\ rv NAME CGundrum:
CJam@on TCulling lj\\ri JHKhhbn EAdejisam RZimrnerman SOomrth CATE 9/ 4 /97 9/ 4 -/97 9/g /97 9/} l /97 9/ A. /97 9/ 3 0 /97 )S/ / /97 tR/ ~Z-
/97 OFFICIAL RECOF,D COPY l
a.
. _L