|
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20247H8981998-05-0707 May 1998
Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.J for Emergency Lighting at Point Beach Nuclear Plant
ML20217N7201998-03-31031 March 1998
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.55a,inservice Inspection & Inservice Testing of Nuclear Power Plant Components
ML20203J9661998-02-27027 February 1998
Comment on GL 98-XX, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps
ML20211L5921997-10-0606 October 1997
Exemption from 10CFR70.24,which Requires That Each Licensee Authorized to Possess Special Nuclear Matl Shall Maintain Criticality Accident Monitoring Sys in Each Area Where Such Matl Handled,Used or Stored.Commission Grants Exemption
ML20217G5021997-09-30030 September 1997
Exemption from 10CFR50 App J Option a Sections III.D.2.(b) (II) & III.D.2.(b)(iii) to Extent That Leakage Rate Testing Not Necessary After Opening Emergency Escape Air Lock Doors for Post Test Restoration or Post Test Adjustment
ML18067A6301997-07-0707 July 1997
Comment Supporting NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Charges,Tests or Experiments).
NPL-97-0357, Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems1997-06-19019 June 1997
Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems
DD-97-15, Directors Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request1997-06-18018 June 1997
Directors Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request
ML20141B0451997-06-0909 June 1997
Requests Extension of Comment Period for NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems
ML20198R1511997-03-0505 March 1997
Transcript of 970305 OI Interview of Aj Cayia in Two Rivers, Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-70
ML20198R1361997-03-0404 March 1997
Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of DF Johnson in Two Rivers,Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-37
ML20198R1281997-03-0404 March 1997
Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of T Malanowski in Two Rivers,Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-28
ML20198R1111997-03-0404 March 1997
Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of E Ziller in Two Rivers, Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-33.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20198R0931997-03-0404 March 1997
Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of Rj Harvey in Two Rivers,Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-28. Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20134B7371997-01-27027 January 1997
Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 to Determine That Setpoint for LTOP Events Will Not Present Undue Risk to Public & Safety.Exemption Granted
ML20115H7061996-06-0404 June 1996
Submits Addl Info to Support Petition for Rulemaking PRM-72-3 Re Amend to SAR
ML20095K0531995-11-28028 November 1995
Exemption from Requirements of App E of 10CFR50,allowing one-time Exemption from Annual Emergency Plan Exercise Requirement
ML18065A0761995-09-13013 September 1995
Comment on Draft Rg DG-1043 Re Proposed Rev 2 to Rg 1.149. New Malfunction Tests Required by Revised Rg Can Be Tested at Required 25% Per Year & Reported in Next 4-yr Testing Rept W/O Rev to Test Plan
NPL-95-0321, Comment on Proposed 10CFR50.54(p) Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Supports Proposed Clarification of Language in 10CFR50.54(p)1995-07-11011 July 1995
Comment on Proposed 10CFR50.54(p) Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Supports Proposed Clarification of Language in 10CFR50.54(p)
ML20086D9031995-06-29029 June 1995
Comments on Proposed Generic Ltr Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Proposed GL Also Avoids Unnecessary Expense for Requirements That Provide No Benefit
ML18064A8201995-06-27027 June 1995
Comment on Proposed GL Re Relocation of Pressure Temperature Limit Curves & Low Temperature Overpressure Protection Sys Limits.Supports Issuance of Ltr
ML20085E6541995-06-13013 June 1995
Comment Re Draft NUREG/BR-0199, Responsiveness to Public. Expresses Concern on Dry Cask Storage W/Exemption Given to VSC-24 Cask & Procedures for Unloading & Transport at Plant
ML18064A7681995-05-26026 May 1995
Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power Operated Gate Valves.
ML20078F4831994-12-20020 December 1994
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & low-power Operations for Np Reactors.Informs That Util of Belief That NRC Already Has Appropriate Regulatory Authority Over Shutdown & low-power Operations,As Provided in Maint Rule
ML20077E8361994-12-0101 December 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low- Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20073M0621994-09-29029 September 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of NUHOMS 52B Dry Casks to List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks. Objects to Proposed Rule Because of Substantial Differences Between Fuel Rods & Assemblies at Different Plant
ML20059E9331993-10-27027 October 1993
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR171 Re Restoration of Generic Exemption from Annual Fees for Nonprofit Educational Institutions
ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning
ML20045D7331993-06-13013 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Recommends That NRC re-evaluate Proposed Testing Frequency Due to Random Testing Rate of 50% Sufficient to Provide Continued Detection Effectiveness
ML20035E1871993-03-18018 March 1993
Requests Answers to Listed Questions Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Compliance for Plant,Per Re Proposed Rule 10CFR72
ML20012G5301993-02-26026 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Suggests That NRC Conduct Formal Hearing
ML20012G5311993-02-24024 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5331993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5341993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5321993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5231993-02-20020 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5251993-02-15015 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20128L9531993-02-10010 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E8851993-01-15015 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E8631993-01-14014 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127F0561993-01-0808 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116N9171992-11-12012 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116K9591992-11-0909 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted
ML20116L4651992-11-0606 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L0501992-11-0303 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted
ML20116K7851992-11-0303 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L1811992-11-0202 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L2051992-11-0202 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L3341992-10-30030 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116L2881992-10-26026 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
1998-05-07
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20217N7201998-03-31031 March 1998
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.55a,inservice Inspection & Inservice Testing of Nuclear Power Plant Components
ML20203J9661998-02-27027 February 1998
Comment on GL 98-XX, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps
ML18067A6301997-07-0707 July 1997
Comment Supporting NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Charges,Tests or Experiments).
NPL-97-0357, Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems1997-06-19019 June 1997
Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems
ML20141B0451997-06-0909 June 1997
Requests Extension of Comment Period for NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems
ML20115H7061996-06-0404 June 1996
Submits Addl Info to Support Petition for Rulemaking PRM-72-3 Re Amend to SAR
ML18065A0761995-09-13013 September 1995
Comment on Draft Rg DG-1043 Re Proposed Rev 2 to Rg 1.149. New Malfunction Tests Required by Revised Rg Can Be Tested at Required 25% Per Year & Reported in Next 4-yr Testing Rept W/O Rev to Test Plan
NPL-95-0321, Comment on Proposed 10CFR50.54(p) Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Supports Proposed Clarification of Language in 10CFR50.54(p)1995-07-11011 July 1995
Comment on Proposed 10CFR50.54(p) Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Supports Proposed Clarification of Language in 10CFR50.54(p)
ML20086D9031995-06-29029 June 1995
Comments on Proposed Generic Ltr Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Proposed GL Also Avoids Unnecessary Expense for Requirements That Provide No Benefit
ML18064A8201995-06-27027 June 1995
Comment on Proposed GL Re Relocation of Pressure Temperature Limit Curves & Low Temperature Overpressure Protection Sys Limits.Supports Issuance of Ltr
ML20085E6541995-06-13013 June 1995
Comment Re Draft NUREG/BR-0199, Responsiveness to Public. Expresses Concern on Dry Cask Storage W/Exemption Given to VSC-24 Cask & Procedures for Unloading & Transport at Plant
ML18064A7681995-05-26026 May 1995
Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power Operated Gate Valves.
ML20078F4831994-12-20020 December 1994
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & low-power Operations for Np Reactors.Informs That Util of Belief That NRC Already Has Appropriate Regulatory Authority Over Shutdown & low-power Operations,As Provided in Maint Rule
ML20077E8361994-12-0101 December 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low- Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20073M0621994-09-29029 September 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of NUHOMS 52B Dry Casks to List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks. Objects to Proposed Rule Because of Substantial Differences Between Fuel Rods & Assemblies at Different Plant
ML20059E9331993-10-27027 October 1993
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR171 Re Restoration of Generic Exemption from Annual Fees for Nonprofit Educational Institutions
ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning
ML20045D7331993-06-13013 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Recommends That NRC re-evaluate Proposed Testing Frequency Due to Random Testing Rate of 50% Sufficient to Provide Continued Detection Effectiveness
ML20035E1871993-03-18018 March 1993
Requests Answers to Listed Questions Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Compliance for Plant,Per Re Proposed Rule 10CFR72
ML20012G5301993-02-26026 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Suggests That NRC Conduct Formal Hearing
ML20012G5311993-02-24024 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5321993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5341993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5331993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5231993-02-20020 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5251993-02-15015 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20128L9531993-02-10010 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E8851993-01-15015 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E8631993-01-14014 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127F0561993-01-0808 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116N9171992-11-12012 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116K9591992-11-0909 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted
ML20116L4651992-11-0606 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L0501992-11-0303 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted
ML20116K7851992-11-0303 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L2051992-11-0202 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L1811992-11-0202 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L3341992-10-30030 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116L2881992-10-26026 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L1311992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Cannot Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116K9861992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Deadly Waste Cannot Be Stored Safely.Doe Stated Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116L2681992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116L2841992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E1371992-09-16016 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4721992-09-14014 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4081992-09-14014 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4011992-09-14014 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A3981992-09-11011 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D6611992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D9421992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
1998-03-31
[Table view] |
Text
U. ~ 'T i: UMBER,,
SIEN d,w m g fB 9 '2.MDhhn Muir C
-e g
%q.d,.$
m 222 So. Ilamilton St., Suite 1. Madison, WI 53703 (6050 256-0565 Qaj:pj September 6,1992
'N N ' b
- r. Samuel Ch"k f7 Secretary of the Commission Nuclear Regulatory Comminion w-i Washington, DC 20555 A
Dear Mr. Chilk:
RE: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's proposal to ex storage for high level nuclear waste at Wisconsm Electric Ipedite the use of dry ca nuclear power plant in Wisconsin and Consumer Power Company's /alisades plant in Michigan.
The John Muir (Wisconsin) Chapter of the Sierra Club wishes to register its deep concern over the haste with which this proposalis being handled.
We urge the following:
- 1. The public comment perh>d should be extended to allow more time for the preparation of relevant documents and for the concerned publ> to submit comments.
Moreover, we believe that more adequate notice Ithe pro posal should be given the public, particularly to citizens in Wisconsin and Michigan who would be most directly affected by increased high level waste storage acilities at these sites.
r
- 2. For an issue as significant as this, which affects not only the areas adjacent to the proposed sites but esta blishes a precedent for future high level waste storage for the entire nation, we do not believe the NRC's decision to issue merely an Erwironmental Assessment (EA) is sufficient. The NRC should prepare un Envirimmental Impact Statement (EIS).The EIS should include among other things a survey of the anticipated safe " life" of dry cask storage, an analysis of the adequacy of tests performed on the casks, and the possible danger to ground and surface water, especially to I.ake Michigan.
- 3. Wisconsin Electric Power Company has already requested a permit from the Wisconsin Public Service Commission (PSC) to establish faciHties on-site for dry cask storage. Wisconsin's PSC, after considering the issue, has determined that an EIS is required. We urge the NRC to wait until Wiscamsin's EIS is completed before any decisian on expediting day cask storage is made.
Sincerely yours,
$6 OkI.
b,fm
/
Mary llen Johnson Conservation Chair, John Muir Chapter, Sierra Club cc: Gordon E. Gunderson Gregg Moore, John Muir Chapter Chair 9209150t40 92O_906 57 28645 PDR
)
To enjoy and preserve the wdd places of earth...
r Printed on tecycto cacer
.
