|
---|
Category:GRANTS OF EXEMPTION FROM & EXTENSION TO NRC REQUIREME
MONTHYEARML20247H8981998-05-0707 May 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.J for Emergency Lighting at Point Beach Nuclear Plant ML20211L5921997-10-0606 October 1997 Exemption from 10CFR70.24,which Requires That Each Licensee Authorized to Possess Special Nuclear Matl Shall Maintain Criticality Accident Monitoring Sys in Each Area Where Such Matl Handled,Used or Stored.Commission Grants Exemption ML20134B7371997-01-27027 January 1997 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 to Determine That Setpoint for LTOP Events Will Not Present Undue Risk to Public & Safety.Exemption Granted ML20095K0531995-11-28028 November 1995 Exemption from Requirements of App E of 10CFR50,allowing one-time Exemption from Annual Emergency Plan Exercise Requirement ML20070F7501991-03-0505 March 1991 Exemption from 10CFR55.45(b)(2)(iii) to Permit Submittal of Simulation Facility Certification After 910326 Deadline in Rule But No Later than 910724 ML20236A3081989-03-0808 March 1989 Exemption from 10CFR50,App K Re Injection of Low Pressure ECCS Into Upper Plenum of Reactor in Event of LOCA ML20212F3581986-12-31031 December 1986 Exemption to 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Fire Protection Requirements,Per Licensee 830428 Request,As Supplemented by 831026,851211,860509 & 1010 Ltrs & Encl Franklin Research Ctr Technical Evaluation Rept ML20129J0531985-07-0303 July 1985 Exemption from 10CFR50,App R,Subsection Iii.G Re Requirements for Fire Protection of Safe Shutdown Capability ML20023C1441983-04-28028 April 1983 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Re Fixed Fire Suppression Sys in Control Room ML20028F5741983-01-25025 January 1983 Exemption from 10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii) Schedular Requirements Re RCS High Point Gas Vent Installation ML20027D5471982-10-0707 October 1982 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50 App E,Section IV.F.1 Re Emergency Preparedness Exercises 1998-05-07
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20247H8981998-05-0707 May 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.J for Emergency Lighting at Point Beach Nuclear Plant ML20211L5921997-10-0606 October 1997 Exemption from 10CFR70.24,which Requires That Each Licensee Authorized to Possess Special Nuclear Matl Shall Maintain Criticality Accident Monitoring Sys in Each Area Where Such Matl Handled,Used or Stored.Commission Grants Exemption NPL-97-0357, Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems1997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems DD-97-15, Directors Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request1997-06-18018 June 1997 Directors Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request ML20141B0451997-06-0909 June 1997 Requests Extension of Comment Period for NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20198R1511997-03-0505 March 1997 Transcript of 970305 OI Interview of Aj Cayia in Two Rivers, Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-70 ML20198R1281997-03-0404 March 1997 Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of T Malanowski in Two Rivers,Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-28 ML20198R1361997-03-0404 March 1997 Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of DF Johnson in Two Rivers,Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-37 ML20198R0931997-03-0404 March 1997 Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of Rj Harvey in Two Rivers,Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-28. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198R1111997-03-0404 March 1997 Transcript of 970304 OI Interview of E Ziller in Two Rivers, Wi Re NRC Investigation Case 3-97-008.Pp 1-33.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20134B7371997-01-27027 January 1997 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 to Determine That Setpoint for LTOP Events Will Not Present Undue Risk to Public & Safety.Exemption Granted ML20095K0531995-11-28028 November 1995 Exemption from Requirements of App E of 10CFR50,allowing one-time Exemption from Annual Emergency Plan Exercise Requirement NPL-95-0321, Comment on Proposed 10CFR50.54(p) Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Supports Proposed Clarification of Language in 10CFR50.54(p)1995-07-11011 July 1995 Comment on Proposed 10CFR50.54(p) Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Supports Proposed Clarification of Language in 10CFR50.54(p) ML20085E6541995-06-13013 June 1995 Comment Re Draft NUREG/BR-0199, Responsiveness to Public. Expresses Concern on Dry Cask Storage W/Exemption Given to VSC-24 Cask & Procedures for Unloading & Transport at Plant ML20078F4831994-12-20020 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & low-power Operations for Np Reactors.Informs That Util of Belief That NRC Already Has Appropriate Regulatory Authority Over Shutdown & low-power Operations,As Provided in Maint Rule ML20077E8361994-12-0101 December 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low- Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20059E9331993-10-27027 October 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR171 Re Restoration of Generic Exemption from Annual Fees for Nonprofit Educational Institutions ML20045D7331993-06-13013 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Recommends That NRC re-evaluate Proposed Testing Frequency Due to Random Testing Rate of 50% Sufficient to Provide Continued Detection Effectiveness ML20127D7191992-09-0606 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127D6371992-09-0303 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule & Urges NRC to Extend Comment Period in Order for Concerned Citizens to Prepare Thorough List of Objections ML20114D2591992-08-24024 August 1992 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Proposal to Store Spent Nuclear Fuel in VSC-24 Storage Casks at Plant in State of Wi ML20073N1141991-05-10010 May 1991 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery ML20070F7501991-03-0505 March 1991 Exemption from 10CFR55.45(b)(2)(iii) to Permit Submittal of Simulation Facility Certification After 910326 Deadline in Rule But No Later than 910724 ML20058D4831990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20236A3081989-03-0808 March 1989 Exemption from 10CFR50,App K Re Injection of Low Pressure ECCS Into Upper Plenum of Reactor in Event of LOCA ML20235S8381989-02-22022 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degree Requirement for Senior Reactor Operator (Sro).Unless Grandfathered in Next 4-5 Yrs Author to Be Locked Out of Job & Does Not Intend Spending 20 Plus Yrs as Reactor Operator ML20235N8341989-02-17017 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20148K5591988-03-18018 March 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50,App J Re Mass Point Method of Data Analysis.Recommends Test Duration Criteria in ANSI/ANS-56.8-1987,Section 5.4 Be Accepted in Revised Regulations ML20236Q7991987-11-0909 November 1987 Comments on Proposed Rev 2 to Reg Guide 1.100 Re Seismic Qualification of Electrical & Mechanical Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V8231987-10-13013 October 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Based on Violations Noted During Special Physical Security Insp on 860718-0807 ML20212F3581986-12-31031 December 1986 Exemption to 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Fire Protection Requirements,Per Licensee 830428 Request,As Supplemented by 831026,851211,860509 & 1010 Ltrs & Encl Franklin Research Ctr Technical Evaluation Rept ML20136E0511985-11-20020 November 1985 Memorandum & Order Granting Licensee 850826 Request for Extension of Deadline for Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment to 860525 for Unit 1 & 851231 for Unit 2.Served on 851120 ML20137C8601985-11-19019 November 1985 Transcript of Commission 851119 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote in Washington,Dc Re SECY-330(a) on Point Beach & SECY-225(a) on Sequoyah.Pp 1-5 ML20138M8711985-10-25025 October 1985 Transcript of 851025 Meeting in Washington,Dc Re Util Requests for Exemption from Environ Qualification.Pp 1-76 ML20129J0531985-07-0303 July 1985 Exemption from 10CFR50,App R,Subsection Iii.G Re Requirements for Fire Protection of Safe Shutdown Capability ML20078L1661983-10-17017 October 1983 Response Opposing Wisconsin Environ Decade 830923 Petition for Review of ALAB-739 Re Steam Generator Tubes Repaired by Sleeving.Nexus Between Sleeving & Tube Failure Shown. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078C8801983-09-23023 September 1983 Petition for Review of Aslab 830907 Decision on Sleeving Degraded Steam Generator Tubes.Aslab Erroneously Denied Nexus Shown Between Sleeving & Tube Failure.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20024F2901983-09-0707 September 1983 Decision ALAB-739,affirming ASLB 830204 Initial Decision LBP-83-4,authorizing Issuance of OL Amend to Allow Repair of Degraded Steam Generator Tubes by Sleeving.Wisconsin Environ Decade Failed to Link Sleeving to Tube Failures ML20024F0001983-09-0606 September 1983 Order Extending Time Until 830921 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-719 ML20076E1581983-08-22022 August 1983 Response Opposing Wisconsin Environ Decade 830811 Request to Respond to Hf Conrad Affidavit.Aslab Affirmed Dismissal of Decade Petition to Intervene.Decade Thus Lacks Party Standing.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20024E3031983-08-0808 August 1983 Order Extending Time Until 830906 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-719 ML20024D2151983-07-29029 July 1983 Affidavit of Hf Conrad in Response to Aslab Request Re NRC Assessment of Eddy Current Testing Techniques on Steam Generator Tubes in Transition Region.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20024C3551983-07-0808 July 1983 Memorandum & Order Requesting NRC Assessment of Eddy Current Testing Techniques to Ensure Early Detection & Repair of Significant Degradation ML20024C3981983-07-0808 July 1983 Order Extending Time Until 830807 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-719 ML20204G3481983-04-29029 April 1983 Brief Opposing Wisconsin Environ Decade Exceptions to ASLB 830204 Initial Decision Authorizing full-scale Sleeving. Exceptions Waived for Failure to Brief or Arguments W/O Merits ML20023C1441983-04-28028 April 1983 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Re Fixed Fire Suppression Sys in Control Room ML20069K5951983-04-22022 April 1983 Answer Opposing Wisconsin Environ Decade 820407 Petition for Review of ALAB-719 Which Affirmed ASLB 821210 Special Prehearing Conference Order Dismissing Petition to Intervene.Matter Raised Not Reviewable.W/Certificate of Svc ML20073D6991983-04-11011 April 1983 Request for Extension Until 830427 to File Opposition to Wisconsin Environ Decade Brief on Exceptions.Counsel Has Numerous Obligations Before ASLB & Aslab.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073B9701983-04-0707 April 1983 Petition for Review of Aslab 830322 Decision Denying Wisconsin Environ Decade 821220 Appeal of ASLB 821210 Prehearing Conference Order.Hearing on Steam Generator Tube Degradation Issue Should Be Held.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069F6491983-03-16016 March 1983 Brief Supporting Wi Environ Decade 830211 Exceptions to ASLB Initial Decision.Aslb Refused to Make Prerequisite Findings on Degree of Assurance Necessary to Protect Public Safety. Affidavit of Mailing Encl 1998-05-07
[Table view] |
Text
.._ _
e, l
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA i
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER Docket Nos. 50-266 COMPANY-and 50-301 (Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units No. I and No. 2)
EXEMPTION I.
Wisconsin Electric Power Company (Wisconsin Electric or the licensee) is the holder of facility Operating ~ License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27, which authorize operation of the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos.1 and 2.
The licenses provide, among other things, that the Point Beach Plant is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or htreafter in effect. The facility consists of two pressurized water reactors located on the licensee's site in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin.
The revision to 10 CFR Part 55, " Operators' Licenses," which becane effective on May 26, 1987, established requirenents for the administration of operating tests on nuclear power plant simulators. These regulations, in conjunction with-10 CFR 50.54(1-1), require facility licensees to use
- simulation facilities when administering operating ?ests for initial licensing and.requalifica tion. These regulations further require that a certified or NRC-approved simulation facility must be used tc administer operating tests after May 26,.1991.
By letter dated December 17, 1990, Wisconsin Electric l
l l
9103110032 010300 ADOCK0500g6 3DR
. _. - _. _ -. ~. -., - -. -.. -,, -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-2 requested an exemption from the schedular requirements for :ertification of a plant-referenced simulator.
]
11.
The licensee intends to comply with 10 CFR 55.45(b) by certifying a
_ plant-referenced simulator.
Section 55.45(b)(2)(iii) of 10 CFR Part 55 requires that facility licensees proposing to use a simulation facility consisting solely of a plant-referenced simulator submit Form NRC-474,
" Simulation Facility Certification," no later than 46 months after the e
effective date of this rule, that is, by March 26, 1991. On December 17, 1990, Wisconsin Electric requested an exemption from this filing requirement to allow for the submittal of NRC Form-474 after March 26, 1991, but no later than July 24, 1991.
-Wisconsin Electric began writing the specifications for the purchase of a plant-referenced simulator in early 1986. These specifications were issued to prospective bidders in December 1986. Af ter extensive negotiations with qualified bidders, the contract for the construction of the Point Prach Plant simulator was let on April 15, 1988.
In accordance with 10 CFR 55.45(b)(5)(vi), any certification report must include, among other things, a description of perfonnance testing completed for the simulation facility.
It has always been the intent of Wisconsin Electric to use the Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) of th'e plant-referenced-simulator as the testing portion of the certification process. The FAT of the
- simulator was originally scheduled for a 90-day period beginning on September 3, 1990. Due to delays in hardware delivery cnd software development, i
the FAT was not actually commenced until October 9,1990.
L
_. _ _., -. _ _ _ _ _.... ~.... _ _.. _.. _. _. - _. _. _. _... - -.. _ _ _,
'.i.
This 5-week delay, of itself, would not have necessitated a late submittal l
of NRC Form-474 However, once the Flit began, the simulator did not perform as well as expected. Wisconsin Electric, therefore, augmented its staff at the sinulator vendor's site by three people in order to better support test administration and documentation. The licensee also increased the testing schedule from one shif t a day, 5 days a week, to two shif ts a day, 6 days a week. These actions have achicved some positive results, but the resolution of some of the test discrepancies and failures still requires the attention of expert vendor technical personnel.
Additional resources of this nature have not been available.
Secause of the late testing start and the unexpectedly poor performance of the simulator, Wisconsin Electric has concluded that the point Beach Plant simulator will not be ready for certification until af ter the March 26, 1991 deadline.
Wisconsin Electric proposes to comply with 10 CFR 55.45(b) for the point Beach Plant by certifying a plant referenced sinulator by July 24, 1991.
During the period from May 26, 1991 until certification of the simulator, no initial or requalification operating tests are scheduled, 111.
The Commission has determined, pursuant to 10 CFR 55.11, that this exemption is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property and is otherwise in the public interest.
Furthermore, the Commission has determined, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), that special circumstances of 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(v) are applicable in that the exemption would provide only temporary relief from the applicable regulation and the licensee has n.ade good faith efforts to ccmply with the regulation.
This exemption grants a temporary relief period
\\
-4 of 4 months from the March 1991 date for submittal of the Point Beach Plant simulation facility certification. Good faith efforts to comply with the regulation were made as follows:
(1) Wisconsin Electric began writing specifications for a plant-referenced simulator in early 1986 and issued invitations for bids in December 1986.
(2) On April 15, 1988, Wisconsin Electric entered into contract for construction of a plant-referenced simulator. The simulator was originally scheduled for delivery by December 1990 and was to be ready for training by February 1991.
(3) Wisconsin Electric has kept the NRC informed of the status of the Point Beach Plant simulator project.
In letters dated OctoDer 11, 1989, and March 13, 1990, the licensee provided updated estimated certification dates. On April 10, 1990, in a meeting at NRC headquarters, Wisconsin Electric presented the details of the project and its status.
(4) Upon identifying unexpectedly poor performance during simulator testing, Wisconsin Electric allocated additional resources to the project. Three people were added to the licensee's staff at the simulator vendor's site and testing was increased from five to twelve shifts per week.
(5) Wisconsin Electric intends to comply with 10 CFR 55.45(b)(2)(iv) by not administering the simulation facility portion of the operating test on other than a certified simulator after May 26, 1991.
l l
The Commission hereby grants an exemption from the schedular requirements of 10 CFR 55.45(b)(2)(iii) for submittal of NRC Form-474, " Simulation Facility Certification." This exemption is effective until July 24, 1991.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.21, 51.32 and 51.35, an environmental assessment 3
and finding of no significant impact has been prepared and published in the Federal Register on March 5,1991 (56 FR 9238 ).
Accordingly, based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission has determined that the issuance of this amendment will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
The licensee's exemp. ion request dated December 17, 1990 is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. and at the local public document room located at the Joseph P. Mann Public Library,1516 Sixteenth Street, Two Rivers, Wisconsin.
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Bruce A. Boger, Director Division of Reactor Projects - lil/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 5th day of March 1991.