ML20210E017
| ML20210E017 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1986 |
| From: | Miriello P AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210D908 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8609220081 | |
| Download: ML20210E017 (5) | |
Text
- --_
July 28,1986 ;
IN THE MATTSR OF CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT l FURNISHING FALSE RADIATION EXPOSURE RECORD 3 AND HAVING NEGLIGENT RADIATION PRACTICES. .
AFFIDAVIT OF PATTY S. MIRIELLO County of Charleston State of South Carolina PATTY S. MIRIELLO BEING DULY SWORN ACCORDING TO IAW, DEPOSES AND SAYS AS FOLLOWS:
- 1. My name is Patty S. Miriello, I reside in Charleston County, South Carolina. I was employed by Carolina Power & Light (CP&L) from February 1985 through August 1985 I worked at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (SHNPP), New Hill, N.C. and at the Brunswick nuclear plants (BSEP), Southport, N.C. I was employed .,
as a health physics technician and worked in radiation areas and
- was e
- : posed to radiation and radioactive ontamination in the course; of my work at both plants. (At SHNPP there were primarily calibra-tion sourcas and chemistry sources.) .
- 2. The nurnose of this affidavi1 is to duplicate and document the infornation in the affidavit which was riven to Harold Denton, the United States Muclear Reculatory Commission (USNRC) Director of 7e ulation, at a nress conference and meeting with intervenors arainst Shearon Mar *is at the Raleich. N.C. Civic Center on Julv-2.1086. 3:: cept for typing error corrections and a clarification-this affidavit is identical to the one given to Harold Denton.
- 3. False dose records and false construction records at any nuclear plant are a serious safety threat to the public. The '
public must also suffer the further distress of being obligated-to pay for corruption in the nuclear power industry and for the j resulting violatica of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and
', of State Codes.
.. 8609220081 860915
l I
Page 2
- 4. ,(A). During the week of 8/9/85, I and another technician were both subject to internal radioactive contamination due to CP&L's negligent radiation practices. The other technician and I were working with what we thought was a very low level activity liquid for.about two hours. We had no respirators and we were not directed to don respirators by the CP&L health physics techrdeian in charge of the job.
For about 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> I and the oth'er technician were within 1 to 3 feet of the spills of this radioactive liquid. The spills were within our breathing zone. Even though we wiped up as much as possible, this liquid evaporated from the rags and from the dirty surfaces of equipment. Airborne radioactivity most definately resulted was most probably inhaled.
Near the end of the 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> my throat was burning. I asked the other technician if he had the same problem. He answered affirma-tively.
I asked, "'.that is this stuff?"
He answered in a disgusted manner in about these words:"It could be anything in this place."
The conversation continued in about these words:
I then stated, '".lell at least it's a low activity liquid."
He then asked, "Do you know that? You don't know what it's like around here."
l I then asked, "'clell somebody did gamma spectroscopy on this and counted it before we touched it? Didn't they?"
He laughed and said, "Ask the technician in charge."
By now I had caught on.
I asked the technician in charge the following question: "Did any-thing unusual. show up in the gamma spec. or when this stuff was count'ed?"
The CP&L. health physics technician in charge answered, "I don't know, I . don't know if it was sampled."
A9 E * ' *e S m - . . _ . _ . . - - - . . , - _ . - _
. . Page 3 r
I said, "0.K."=
The. other technician who was inhaling the same fumes and airborne 4
contamination which I inhaled said, "'ilell I told you so."
I cursed and continued to ask questions. He offered to show me more radiological problems at BSEP. I had seen'enough problems already to know what he was talking about. I had hoped that I had just been very unluc'cf or that I had just been in the areas .
when things became screwed up. However, a pattern was emerging from my experience at both plants (SHNPP and BS2?). So I_ offered to look at the problem areas at' BSEP which he wanted to show -me.
He did not want to do it openly and we discussed how we would go 4 about doing it without detection. I had the intention to get some-j thing done through proper CP&L channels. I know now that there aren't any proper CP&L channels in the past or present.
(3). ';Ie began looking into radiological problems the next day. He took me directly into an unposted high radiation area having easy access for anyone to go into. This area had radiation levels which necessiatated that it be locked and guarded, a' respirator was good protection also. '!Ie had three survey instruments. I carried a
. beta-samma survey meter and. surveyed constantly as did the other
- technician with his beta-gamma meter. He also carried a teletector which is normally used as a gamma meter. The beta-gamma meters were ,
set on the same scale. The initial readings at the area entrance
! were several hundred millirem / hour on both meters. Further into the area, I watched the instrument held at about thigh level reach f appro::imately 1000 milliren/ hour. At that point we stopped and
! compared readings to see if the instruments were functioning properly.
l They were. Both instruments held side by side were within 10',5 of l each other and close to 1000 millirem / hour. This was not a ' hot
[ spot' either. It was a continuous region. ,
Tdeothertechniciannowbecameverycautious. He began to survey with the teletector at about shoulder and chest height. His readings were.3000 to 5000 millirem / hour. He said, "Let's get out of here." ,
f- ' Page 4 We were in this area for 15 to 30 minutes. Ny pocket dosimeter read upcn exiting the area about 400 millirem. (Note: The yaerly occupati,onal exposure for a radiation worker, 10CFR20, is normally 5000 millirem.) A worker.could have easily exceede'd his yearly
, limit in this area. '
(C ) . My thermoluminescent dosimeter badge (TLD) and pocket dosimeter were turned into the dosimetry office due to the high pocket dosimeter reading (3/4 ths scale). Within an hour to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, I was told to get off the site. Moreover, I was never told on that day what my TLD read.
In order to obtain a new TID and a pocket dosimeter, I initiated an exposure investigation form by signing the attached form (attachment 1) and giving it to Alice Thompson, a dosimetry technician. She wrote in only the dosinctry identification of the dosimetry which I turned in and my. reason as to what may have occurred. That was all that I ever saw written on the enposure investigation form. I never saw the com-pleted form (attachment 1) until CF&L made it public.
(D). The USHRC should note that: C?&L lied to the USURC, the State of North Carolina, and to the public in the CP&L and 3rowne affidavit which C?SL used in it's Applicants' Response to the Request by the Conservation Council of North Carolina and ';! ells Edelman for the Ad-mission of New Contention 'ilB-4 (Falsification of Enposure Records) dated May 8,1936. In addition the Brown affidavit is second hand information or hearsay.
C?aL and Stephen Browne state:
....! hila Ms. Miriello may not agree with the dose she was assigned during work at the 3runswick plant, she was fully informed and aware of the dise assigned, and acknowledged such by signing the Personnel Exposure Investigation report form for that incident..."
'I signed the form from about 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM on 8/9/85 in order to ob'ain a new TLD and to initiata an investigation. No investigative results were yet on the form. New TID's aren't just given out at any
O
. ' Page 5 time. Alice Thompson asked me to sign the form to start the in-vestigative process and to acknowlede receipt of new dosimetry.
hli'ce Thomp, son never filled in the results of the investigation in my presence and no CP&L employee ever informed me of the results.
The CP&L and Stephen Browne affidavit contains distortions of the truth (lies) which are to numerous.to cover at the present.
(E ) . Since CP&L was so busy kicking me off the site (BSEP) on 8/9/85; they didn't have time to give me a whole body count. I was never offered one or told to get one to check for the presence of internal contamination. Moreover, where did they sit down with me and have time to discuss any exposure investigation and yet have the time to collect the data necessary to make the investigation? Does Stephen Browne remember discussing the exposure investigation with me? He states in the affidavit to the public and to the USNRC that this discussion occured and that I was fully in formed.
(?). In all of my statements to the USNRC and to the public concern-ing the CF&L nuclear safety problems, I offer to and have offered in the past to submit to any form of lie detection.
LLL' f scl y }.'k?
/
/ ?atty 3. Miriello ,
l* ;bf, f' e,-k ,
( h ..n -A (f , rYf,-
hois t i.;; . ic.:r. c<.g..a D s . . n*; s js e ## Os85rba L4.r.4 c.s. 2, i;i en f .. 4 s . .. >
t
i e .
July 28, 1986 IN THE MATTER OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE EXIT INTERVIEWS AND THE QUALITY CHECK PROGRAM AT THE SHEARON HARRIS PLANT BEING USED BY CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT TC IDENTIFY NUCLEAR SAFETY CONCERNS AND COVER UP. .
AFFIDAVIT OP PATTY S. MIRIELLO 4
Patty S. Miriello, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says the following:
My name is Patty S. Miriello. I live in Charleston County.S.C.
1.
I was employed by Carolina Power & Light (CP&L) from February 1985 .
through August 1985 I worked at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (SHNPP), New Hill, N.C. and at the Brunswick nuclear plants (BSEP) , S outhport, N .C .
I was employed as a health physics techni-clan and worked in radiation areas and was exposed to radiation and radioactive contamination in the course of my work at both plants.
(At SHNPP there were radioactive calibration sources and radioch istry sources)
! 2. The purpose of this affidavit is state that the quality assur-ance Quality Check program was not being used as intended at the l
Carolina Power & Light Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.
I f
3 The Quality Check Program at SHNPP is operated by the quality assurance department. The Quality Check program is designed to allow any employee who sees any criminal activity or any activity that would effect the safe construction and operation of the nuclear plant the opportunity to expose the problems confidentially to Caro-lina Power & Light. Quality Check form deposit boxes are located Quality $ssurance exit interviews arm also ccnduc on the SHNPP site.
When an employee is terminating with any company (including con-tractors) at SHNPP, the employee,is called in for an exit interview The main question aske'd of
'with the quality assurance department.
'the employee is Did you see anything wrong with the nuclear plant?
The employee is then asked to sign a form stating that he or she did or did not see an ing and indication of what the problems
'were which were ob" gi d. C t C, s'\ j ,q ,r' //'.
. a,
- wt i;u- ,
/ <
Paga 2
- 4. In February of 1985, I was employed as an engineer by Nuclear Energy Services (NES) in the inservice inspection (preservice in-spection) of the Shearon Harris plant. On February 25,1985, I .
began work ytith Carolina Power & Light and resigned from NES. Prior I to leaving NES, Tom Brombach approached me and stated that Jim Willis, ,
the plant manager, called and requested a refereisce. Tom Brombach stated that he had provided a good reference on my behalf. Tom Brombach was the CP&L engineer in charge of the inservice (preservice)
! inspection at Harris. After this, Tom Brombach was notified by the quality assurance department that they wanted to have me in for an exit interview. This was to discuss what I had seen primarily while I had worked in inservice inspection (preservice inspection).
Prior to the quality assurance e: cit interview Tom Brombach and Phil i
Temple approached me concerning what I was going to say. They were friendly. Morrever. at this noint in time I felt that it would have been unviise for ne to restate troblems which I had already broucht i to their attention in the tact. I had done mv .iob and I had informed my surervision: Tom Brombach was the CP&L engineer in charge of the inservice inspection, Phil Temple was a CP&L engiTieer in inservice inspection, and Stanely Pruitt was a CP&L inservice inspection spec-
! inlist. I went to these CP&L representatives with the following concerns:
- Tom Brombach - In November 1984, he was told of Conam inspection personnel missing a row of steam generator tubes during the eddy
- current inspection. He was told that John Camburn, Conam data analyst, had caught the missed tubes however, he was urged to look further into the matter by myself. I was told that the matter was beine looked into.
j
- Tom Brombach and Stanely Pruitt - In July or August of 1984, I indicated to these men that I had found between 10 to 20 welds that had been cut out or reworked. The inservice inspections had been done on the old
. . welds.- No new inspections were completed. Therefore, the inservice inspection reports on these welds were now false. I was told that it would be taken care of.
(Phil Temple knew of my concerns on these matters also.)
- Tom ~Brombach - In January of 1985 was given two copies of the same
,l'.. ,
Paga 3 1 l 1
inservice inspection report of the weld identified as 1-ISI-RC-23 ,
1 One copy was of the ultasonic weld inspection report which showed indications and the second copy was of the weld inspection report where the indications had been taken off the report and the problem was now being identified as beam redirection. The second report was to be placed in the files instead of the first report I was told to do that by Ron Saunders.
which was to be destroyed.
So I did what I thought was right. I took both copies to Tom Erom-bach and asked if something was wrong. He said. not to worry that the recorts were all right. (See attachments 1 and 2, page 4.)
6..Therefore, when it came to informing the quality assurance department during my exit interview of these problems; there was no need to. So in relation to the matters of:
- a. Missed steam generator tubes during eddy current inspection, *
- b. Inservice inspection reports invalidated by rework, and
- c. Inservice inspection reports being replaced by additional documentation not based on reinspection I did not inform the quality assurance personnel. Other CP&L versonnel told me not to worry and that matters'had been taken care of.
In addition. I was not leavine the Harris site and I felt that this I was simolv coine to work 4
so called exit interview was irregular.
in another buildine at the Harris site. If I said anything about j cafety problems it would certainly tip off CP&L as to what to cover j up and it would probably result in retaliation against me.
- Consequently, I consider thequality assurance exit interviews as worthless in identifying nuclear safety problems. This is an internal company interview and it can be used be CP&L unscrupulously.
- Fortunately, when it came to the problems with drug abuse by the Conam eddy current inspectors: I had sent the FBI'a letter about that in November of 1984 I knew that CP&L would never admit to j- a drug problem at Harris. ,
i - .. .
8
- ee i 1 -_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - . ._.
J
. Pags 4 7.. On my last day of work in August of 1985: I was given another CP&L exit interview with the quality assurance people. This time I was really leaving the Marris niant site and I decided to state that I'had'seen nuclear safety nroblams- However, I wouldn't tell the quality assurance people what they were. In August of 1985, I 4
had been told that I had been under surveillance at Brunswick. Now
! if I was under surveillance, then CP&L knew what the safety concerns we which I had looked at,at least at Brunswick. No CP&L management employee approached me at this time with a statement about what I
- had seen at Br'2nswick and what corrective. actions would be taken.
Therefore, I told the quality assurance exit interviewer that I believed that the interview was designed to find out what was wrong and to cover up. When I filled in the exit interview form; I stated that remark or a similiar indication of lack of trust.
- 8. In retrospect, the FBI never did anything with the tip that Conam personnel were using drugs and doing steam generator inspections at nuclear plants all over the United States. CP&L did get around
) to looking at their steam generator eddy current data. But it was l only after months had passed. When CP&L started to investigate late in August every area I had worked in with the hope of finding l . out the nuclear safety concerns I had ( As I believe they wanted to cover them up): CP&L found out that I had voiced some concern about
! the steam generator inspections. Therefore-CP&L had the Electric'
! Power Research Institute take a look at their eddy current data from the steam generator inspections. However, this was months after I l brought the matter to the attention of Tom Brombach.
r i
9 It is my belief that the quality check confidential reporting forms are used in the same way as the quality assurance exit interviews The main purpose is to coverup nuclear safety complaints, before
! someone as myself figures out what is going on and goes public..
i 1;
NUI f fb'2d l '
, / PatAy 5. f.liriello i '4/ . i /l & n n~.
f..
,.,.e e' .* .l . o / o *l./ **'s Nee,y , e. _r
~ . -- - - - -
a T
. Mfac/muscf.2.
- e. ; ,.
S h zsr.su-op z.~ 3Dl M Plant / Unit 3)/21 # #/ Page / of S~ ,
ai ^ Comp /SystesP,.be A1.. f CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Data Sheet No. f t/" TD/-039#- {
150.jo.g.,3 Loop % Procedure No._rr7 re/ !
l f
Subject:
- 9. m. ao LhtrAr Rev/ Change No. "
cV,
! vyetoinnevt mttvec crinen trun Calibration
,j Mf e /Model No. tk ft inL- 3 ! semn Ane,,ed/f # Med. . <L, ,e Block No. O t". O c - l I 2 /13"1[e fiba vi? Ithd., Fabrication No. Wm Serial No. t Fixturine - Surface o . O.
t j j' .svees teneeh t 7. 80 sevie er h e wa. .I AW Block Temp &o I f9.e t fyi ath. . . . 15 " Eu.J e,( Comp. Temp 4G -TFM-e t 7e *F l-Swees Delav e 7. f0 st-e &
Thickness . / 73 "
2i Pul se tanee't i5maeta.# ..J r......, . O . Sf' -1441.( 1 CRT Calibrated in Lta r~ene.eO.Ite. wm an. AMA e,-<m, wahE..*.N A in %$ */ Wr A+/ Ar*4 i f Each !!aj. Screen Div= _ r.s 7 d i
Filter?M/4 VidmeMJack?2 w.. .....,a a.., . 4f. vvw eries
- 3*
- m, A yn ee w p .p @ z.r.a.
n rein,.. es ..# .. . 9 r i ,-- . m. u m lj yeae c. , ,. . .n o . . . .. .M r...,..-.
r...- ,.. . -.. .o tt m et 7 r
- I c.<- r,..-..t% utes . % ceue . e e. . . ,. "t336 SCAN AREA e ,. . - e .. .< - a ..< ....#% r 43 DAC Ft.OT O' t.T.7 f 100 I
ins *R. tNrit"Y CAL.
90 i , i ,
i
, g
, i t
i n o y,,,, g Ams 11-..d e - To Vald ij lMieh! t.ov! !Mieh ! tov 60 , , , Ny a; y l 100l f/ l l loo lMo I i l 1 iM '
l i} """ """
2 I 90 l 9.fi 6 I .ro I y ' ' i lM I! N ,'
I e
t ) '3 l fD l fd l7l 40 l Sd 20 f'
10 o nliisilini Lii,ilno imi liv e il un sin lin-i.e., W hN i 4 l 70 l 3fl 8 l 30 I /r Ci e R i
)' j(
I s.co, en.-s a,
, ,,r in ,- ,.
0 1 2 g4 5 h7 8 5.go 1$
! Initial l dB l Result Recordable .
!# l Jy EXAMINATION Yndie s-ton s COMMENTS /RIASON FOR 80 -4 INCOMPLETED SCAN (S)
I WELD / AREA Tes- No l Ceca 80 l -12 M i , &, fg , g l ufA 3,/4 lXg g_ , ,, , , 4,, 4,,, ,, ,g ,,,,
! 40 +6 82 g l l n,f (ch e. p. ., +, I
\ l /2 --b r a n-i!,i 20 l +1? l f2
\ '
- I f
lf CALIERATION CHEC- TTME \
- r I Initial Cal.
I 0 720 N , i Intemediate N'
g i
fj Inte mediate
" ' * "
- 18
EXAMINERS 1 7 / # Date/Yf ff Level m-U nal Cat. / Job 2WA f,/_$/ ' Data /./f tJ-Level e
r ip lt *
. ADDITIONAL SHEET 5? CNECK BOX REVIEVERS 1 Date
/ Coneinuseten Wa.=P'a, 2 Date ,
l ,j huen t .., A D<h,i. M 3 Date of
- 9% * .
p ~
v ' -
NUCt. EAR ENERGY SERVICES. INC. ,
l o 4 .. . ,
P f'
NUCl. EAR ENERGY SERVICES,ING, .
Project No. Site
<st <~
L* Location Dates (Ho/Ihp/Ys') '
ft/M// !/ Pr/c cf s//Y/c 3~
- " *-"'-' '- e ,'
Item identificq)nn,.,,,.,.r.';3 18o t.ncet Ion Page '
',t of I~
t<2W 9. sr . . l't..
Esassin Anrlo Attached Cat. Unta gicetsus-o3},/ . .*s. ". .=1 45".1 45; s j 8
397 vet O* ,
e
\* j- f Ema=Ine A Level a # " # linickneos ,J/1 =
fp *M_dd.: #'"d' g "E J ' N//f ' J * ~~'
s~ ~ ~~j
/
Dlaiseter (nons. ) /*
HP Hetal Patti U man w ia q RBR Distance f rom ( to S.U. at miaximuss response.
Remaining Back R,ef tcet ton U platance f rnen welil L Distance fross Dature 0 W nistance frone wel.I at 50% of linx amp. (fud)
'at 50% of tium a mip . (hackward)
--e--
i, j ;
tod. I u HAx FUD IIACKilAllD I,l L Ly MR S.U.
j of int HAX 50% HAX
/k_fL -~d l- *1*
- j [")
U HP W HP W llP 50Z max 1 2 50% amp 1.o c . '
No. DAC
- llAX RDtARKS HAX
~ '
i .30 oP sof" to. c f" o. PJ " c.fi /st nr a freo a f j;) y, ,, ,_ , , , y,,; ,, ,, gyg y ,
- m V. *r/ i/runy A sA/src=
1 Y sl~ 1f 1.22" )){
__ /. Y3 Jec' /IP
- t c3[es er Y f,k _ m , *y,.g) fi 7,y;gs *j/ g_stys.ap h/// /rr s is ,a s u- s<
s ,P s.r>
a u.,e > W' u.. ,. 1.n.s,,, ,a ,,n - ,i x,,a;,. ,.., imu,nu, s t
/M- pdAM* /&'s ,a/A- oW/
g Nu#.-
A'c<4,re,- it) in WW FULL SCALE PLOT 1 SERE:
llT g ll li es G )[/ s b !# #
'l8'
,a i, ,I _ .
f ,
- g R EVIDJta DATE '-. ' *. \'
l SEVIEllER DATE ' d' ,,
. REVIElfra DATE 3...,s AA*
h os".
. Ass be r**//'I's is'Af** flest p,e,ef pste /AAM pap e/
b 4
t
.,M
..W
- % - . g. gy , .
- $ 4e *.1 F 3 4) * '
- e # "* .. -
4 . . g* ,A # a. . Y3
.*g-
._ . . . ..m -
... . - 4 .
_ _ g___.
in> CLEAR ENERGY SERVICES lHC.
I .
Project No. Sita L*Locatlu+t SCL' C' .ffN// *'./ P*/s e d Ilates ND/NYU8*) *
'#**#**~' ///f'/W -
E t em Islent i ficapn ,.,g,.,y(.,y; uoLocat lost Pa;te 7 ,( a r gg,/ Q. of S~~ .
.w,
,- Ea.iminerr TC
g&;j}A pval .s.:n Ans:le liscsk n* 45",3 45,8
"' AttacticJ Cal. Data Slicet_ ,_,___,,
g: . ,, __1
.'g__ ,,,,_.J cae= In.e r ;c esuit ng Tisicknene ,77)~
- A Lpv ,
1 ._,, - plP Heral Path W man liar Remaining Back Reflection Distance from y to S.U. at maximum response. ""I y gi g ,,,,,, g ,,,, ,fe l .1 . at 50% of linx amp. (fwJ)
- l. Distance from Datum 0 W Inletance from wel.1 *nt 50% of Han amp . (l.ackward) g-- -!-- - - -"."'
g, j ' InJ. I Iup itAcxuAllD 1. Ly W llA Y snf HAX RBR S.U. 'j
*I 50% HAX l j e-l j No. DAC W !!P W g
HP W 3 IIP 50Z max 50% amp Loc. -5 =lik';g g i HAX HAX RDtARKS i 2 ff 0. ! " 0 SC " c6* 0 12 0 !!' 013
- 0 A I'*'
- Af fr' 'm! 5 I's e A9 *'7 Alb I'* * ~
ss/forel$ sellf af 19/f199 faff /er/ _
, , , - h ,, -
_ro , ir - c.u- nr .ri r ..n. *
% ,w u. ,o.. .i. x, ,,1 no a _-
1
. - - . . . +'ortey >*q r Ma der S h. l $$ ha Y h Yf $. 5 ll$ 2 ${d4 f ,$ J, ef,gy9 fg,q ghg f g y y gy 3f gggy f,qq
.I re
- 1se* 14rar s.d/ade tr/Js.OsA Es
? 20 c31' sJi c. rf ' / 9v' e-12" 1s9' **
st Ar/ 3 Y ;,,;,,, yys ] gaff,,,y m /j gth ppc l pae'auee O 40 hdfMN Y(W l DRAW TULL SCALE PLOT llERE: 8 8 8.s %' e ' i' 8
- 8
,7 (i) ***J *7 y
r9 e. gg , ! 7 \s ' REvtEuER DATE \, Q ! REviEuER DATE . N g ( REVIEuER DATE . N " '# F#* T a , .,- . ,qsyshft fossr/ f./11 s'Jf4 //est d'Arsf d'invf lN * ** *t#l'## $ , i ge e e - .v- , , , -- . ., _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
MM M :r~= u s n cm :r r=.x =:=.cn----A.K ?. n " " "~ ~ " -" --A " C * ~ " * " ' '
- O- D NUCLEAR ENERGY GERVICES,INC.
O -
' Project Hs. ' Site T a;-(f L*Location Date Ob/lby/Ya-) - s'
~ S m //1 l'efgd O.f5' "8"'"'**"" *.
Item tJe nt i f Ica,\ t on f.,,p.gg Ua l.ocatlon Iage 9 f
. p y pre ff Q_ of 't *.
y _ *). ,,71 _ _ Ecc.a l ne r : TC-I A-Level 4 Annie 0" 45".s 45gs Attacleed Cul, unen . we TW#M 116531- - ' \ l .. j Ecc = In.: -IA ave :c a sin ing TliIelinaua 7/./
\{* ~[ ;, #
g ~ * - -- - - i g, g ' ~/ y , HP Hetal Path W man wuQ RBR Reestning Back Reflection Distance f rosa g* to S.U. et si.au fraura response. y pg,,,,,,gg,,,yeld L- Dietsuce frora Datun 0 at 50% of IInx emp. (fud) --e-- -!-- ~ ~ ~ ~ " * *
- W llistance from walil *ta 50% of tin w a nap . (Isaduard) *
(, j Ind. I DJD IIACKUAltD 8 U I,3 Ly RBR S.U. "j 11AY 30Y HAX 50% HAX
- I , *1
(*) U HP W HP W I!P <-- t' SCI max 50% emp Loc. ~~ C ' No. DAC l HAx ItAX - EUIAREE 8 % c. s ri* _g.if . se7 i/2 4 y?< v *
. c. fr Av .wer r * >r adi?/n a s sn ,o see' 1 /6 .
_el _ f17 0. It' d.f 3 rw rn _f tr t'
- fg'ge # ,
N A er p'ks-8/r*/// d r*trise A rs/fe/1
,,r s . <. r .
/3 s!O /. i 23/ / Jf Jer f.c c /A1 4 .
ryor 5
- J'&~ 'cf errretor trotras w.* t sf J3 le' t lif' 22f' _f. i1 ' J ts*
- 1. /J' # fc'gu A J' e art! sra/J pr cr et isflee e r s><!/
il . _20 _c)$ P. 2 ,f.cf e s tl 0 11 c. 22 YrtAs Y ! A/t retoor d nts*!**
!f f 4/A em'/ Ji o /Je> r ~r.sz,!
r.YEs'I=sr kv* rroir"/5 }/WN/n
~
mse,f " UP.AU FULL SCALE PLCT liritEs 8 "'"' " ' # Q b flh O ,
'l l f j REVI DJER DATE C \ ,}. u 4
( B EVIDfER DATE . s s
. n 1
REVIDlER DATE .
'J . , .
b~ f ,- <,, .
- - - ^ .
. A ns. bit Jweefg W)2 +dre JSr!! fM4l O! l### ### Y'".
- A l ,
4 -
- ~)
- I i C, -
. c. I t .
.. l I-G'",- s f (s 'k*2 [ *'e
. t .. 11 ,
d1 \ .
*. j ......
.# , . i .. ... . . _3.L --
S i! I ;f 1 I IU g s g
~ -
. - 1 ,
I i~ I ?8: '3 oji
*. '4 '
l 1 I .I t . s e1 ,
= 'g 5
e m as 3 y a , ' ,, 9 33 m. a
/
i 4 '# i. Q f
- d. 5- 1-
- 2
~
\
f , c=i , i <su .
! ..~
e en u ' n
% w a
~ c u 4 .
\
i l. D - m 5*
- 4. '4 W 7'n=
,; a 2-2 R
we
.I"1 .i
)
. 1 Ib s 3 .l ,$ 3. o 'o _
, ,=
\,
5 _I 5
- 4 sg6Si ..mE E i
E - ~3 .2 a \
*a i
- ll :E e E ~ g %
I , g g ; g ; 4 A.a I 5i m * \g ; a -s s ".%- s i r
*
- waa 3 , y .
\
. u is a ee m- m h-*
.i C'.'A.e 5, $. O O O j o ca = t 6
, \ ,,,
N \ t * *
- u '
\ $c' W 2 22
, :; MVW EE ~ ' *
. /
. *l
- 0 \
* -o 4 * *
- Ej E.# t E== ,
g I. y .
~* .
19 , . & % v - 2
* 'J J = ,
4 k F 9 a aC== a
~* a "o 1 "o jJ 5' 2 32 C M a 12 7 .Y
\]w w w
, g
=
e a 5 3"
?
2
== I QQ$
,e c = %
%
- a W b %
% . l.i
,' O! d g G W j ' x N
i 7 l
- a g$
b
.". $ $ , Cl n Q s. 7v.&p ,N c a = w a ::
- j.!.
0. v .h g o' .: .! a e se q a %m b 7% 9 . W
.u. a es -o -
n
**=
.: 4 ., o ., .,
Ob<2 nV 2 =! E tt 1:!
- C ccc '
I Y 'I j j at 4 .
$ 2 U e : 0 a !! " a ! e { {~!
1 ? 9 I
- 4
(
) D ea 4
, - - - ~ , , - - . . . - , - , - , - - - . - - - ~ - - - - . . ., - . - - - , - - - . - - - - _ . - -~ !
1 l i
-. -.- ,,....,..~ ,,-
,.~ m ' - .,
. ,. l
**.
- jf j
- p.
E.f$w a
-.c I.:.1.t$*
f <, t*// hf,
- Pags / cf
- Plant /Un Q af//2/ M f / Data shear. No.9 /* Sn/.dFM'r <I(ff ;
Comp /Syste.'Ad e r%% f__ CEIBANfION PATA 5HEIT Pro:cdwet Y3.;rrr . re / , ISOf .gf,s. n Lo 2 P */.4 Subjects /) pi ao . W Af 1av/Chan5' No-f* eriv-v ten
- tymmere tv TfurM ___ Calibration y.f a /vo tej *fo. A 0 iMt.* 3 L sen An-t. d'f #
W e + - (l. .* " stock No'. O--Ao-I O kYM; _I th.4.e_l VIlf9k g . 1 $t, . t Theurtae , h t . n- %. w l- A ~. w - J7 seemr a ge 7. To st- t o,-.. 5 i ** bd 3:ock t.eip .5/o n ,.c. : C*"P **L 3 N '
**J =
r pee,3gy __
, 7. 90 -~
Thicknass 7 "' ' y.,n , n e a.13,r--<-e t u f r-+-..--v O . ') I -M' 61 "E i CIT Calin ated in L /, .4
/4/ Mt.
l fr,. . 9 r ,.. . E .., . 4_ ,,-4,, v M *J.' f ' 4u u,<..,w w a
.r.7*f.
'.u r. sscr
<r. Div- m**
;s1 ee~ ah voe<SI.s?,e'A w.. ..- a s- s. DC m* <
,f is irme<m,r ..y spa._u, le)
- u. . --. it L. wo-nerir... es.. m ,-. 131 r , . . ,. . .
va . re. .-s c o.... 'w. I .. ,,-- .., d W M C
'C# '22^
,.,. <--,.. M M.5. %I b.::n....
*733S-
,,,_,, g
! r f,,,., e...,...a. c m % J te, 31c ytye ,
4 i , i , i , < : # s ,
;N A7
#%l I i l i l i ' n ' * ' '
try , t rr ; s --e e t *_. 1 se- i t . .a . d I ' ' I I AN i,Y 1
'.::N 1 1
===" a traid l/ : -
l Rich! tad lRitS l te,, I 6C l; 6
, , , , ,g.,Q iag g,
_l 10 c! fil el (so l . ro _ l e I I I I 'N I l f*1}: i m w r%. ' ' > ' < ' I yi N_ g 3: 20
'E i e t , i e i 2- ' y#
"1 I fD l Pd I71 'lo I 30 I g g ; g 4 ; ; ,
Al 73 l 7fI 5 ! ,3c j /f' ! 10 p,g ,,g,,g,,tiin huiinn!,n elim h m b n-- Cly:.ff c.'M 0 1 2 b, 4 6 3 g7 8 -'.S.g 10 s.. , ' e-. ,e. , -. a ,. O Inted.21! 13 l Rerula gaga rdat,;.a sZw. rA = t-dfeseief cc' err:s/12n :t ten g l ,,, lgy l C.aea 4 CT-QC".IID ICAll (3) C/A?.EA les i3o J
" I '? ! #7 '
f i . er . ga . m l #/4 l v/.4 tXJ Gs . , Y.- c. . G.- 1 4C I4 I f.*2 g l I lG6 45,< 1 R s. % f ,
\ l l l '2 tv
20 l .t? I fl; I ( l \ l t Iennunc9 cm;l rive }l \ l ! I -
~
\ t l i --
l l Tntetsl C.sl. O y. c
\l 8 i
- _J IncarJedista l- K l l I.t:arnedf.ata l A > J.28*t! '
" * #'* EZ,ViCTER$ 1 *7)* .d. _C ae e M 8f.'", Level _ J:r" - -
tr tr.,1 c.it-
- i / na-- g #, f6 A m.0see /./4' .frlavelj _,,
2 %j f [/iA - Ig ,. p rM _ .(, p.i d A M Ca t e /-74.-f_f _ADDI'*.CNAL tig7tst _ cytcy 30,,g __ E C'/ * !*.TC'. Id.de ,., 9 % e 2 Da:e
*m atn.inete
E.-,t..-., #W. , in 3 _
.C.- .
. ..t
. ne-soi- one L. .i Fg
+
3 {f
) f -
i e i i r- - a ( 4
.."'\. ) l E* 4 1 Y
)s
- n.
1 d:l.-
. rl ,,
t s t s t a e
) )
i,- Y'. 4~ W
. . ., .!M. v. = 1 )
g :, . i* . :. !.......l i in gJ.U.3 . . ; 3 t . .
; i. ; - T $ 1 :
u l )J .w s ., e w W ) l
, s , 4 .-
- t . s, : > t i [- . ~1 .
.D .
[E
=
i
-):'ll '
I h
- e
.1 9 t= : > 3 I '
1 i li - - s s %s, 1 9 m
. =
s w
$q S -
. . 2= =.
. t
=
= g .R t y
-; 'i l " " % N3 S--.
\g
- g .. - , s , '
- = .. E g 3
. 1 ,, .-
C C. L l .::
. = . s
- = .s .. - -
- ~ = = , - .y Iga ,
l . .
* == :
l5 *
- l 3' t., = ,< *. a, , "! 4 3 .5 --
A
)
W g M. . 1 , q , 4t ,i d 't ? -
. 'e. c. y= c t-1
;;nsi l.$t t .3
)=4 ,o. re EE * * '
~
; 1 .
il . -**-
,;. r 1:p: .2:vi -
.a " = 5 %
= w _~ a - ,
a5: hih Lii .:
~
s JJ 3x% y E ._ ] (8)l*MI l j j j = % =. 4 % e3 g eV-
=a g<
et 1: :: 1
.' t s,
4 l e g g 38 8 .E S % %
" a I s. ?
i
, J, M
=
J .! ~17
~~
c .j - h J, A w 7 d 1 .YJ.m = = . w c ~ % % N
, 9 g n o w w w M .e e
- r >.
.c h W= h A w
A b Q C Q g % = e L g
< . . ,i .~.,. h l%
\ N ,
W S *
,d. .,,,g s Ea a
'I
$. *C e ,o .
. l JIr --
f 3 3 s .,. s Q a ,m ar g eq .8
- 1 .g g b G 9 W '
0 '~) Yu5 6 -ci t =u j y 2
- it El iS.
.e .
i 2 (, . h3. .. ;. '.:: :.: n
/ s -
u 2 $ g
*4 ! '
L +h i.
. 3 i., i. m ..
s. s
<=
- a
. n i rv a,
. n. n. .
i
*e
. se
. , , - . . . -- , , -.--.---- .,---r- - - -. -. .- ,- . .n -~. , - -.-. - . ,- ...---._,. - - n,- . . , ,
. Ys r :ro1-03W
~
r- i 1
'v,
% 3 s r<
<s
.,i . I 5 c, < ; :3
,= i s V
i . 1 1 4s 3
. y .:<
.I cG-r t : ,
.i. . u i -.: o e, +s=- s 1 t
).
.,3
.v .i.Q...y- y'. j .. ._n
. . g= !n z g i1 t - ,
- e. $ t t, *s s.y6,
; ; 3 . 3 ,
5 . l
.s
%r u
t e, 2. s e* q w q
- s. -
a s .
- , -. ,i : d t s . 4 3
, I : J a 24 : .r...; 3 1 / *t
> s ,e .: s 4 ._ >. ,
. i .e.. . i s se 3 .,,1x,a ss , .
3 ;A ws - l r s. s ,.
- .s- .
t
<~ $ 1h.
w ., ( . g u p 33
<a. 3 t .s, 4 <
Q op i~5 = g. s' o w'
=
en e g e. g
- e. ) =
. 3 s v.
N ( > k ,
. : . .a - ,-- ., i E5 2o I 4 == I' * * * ' ~.O 1 I'
= 'i "* 2 2 ~
2I g I l a F # $st!!$22
- iS'lile- N .
- t. 0M 4
J -=aa .
= -
4 [jj
~
D I ' E E k' i J.d ,'
- 3. .l. i
=
h h $< $::h==> c ."_-. .a 1. 5$ a .
,, k v 't ,
x, s s.o ii = -:li n it - 6
, s' s
s, n ,s =- = ( 'l .i la A 3 2 52 .
- - - =, c-te v.
a,,': - u .3 U
< we 'Is .
. .I 'DI i +M
*' 'l 4 # a " 5l =~ j ,g,l ay S t c',
a
. ,; . I=9%
Nx ' 5 $ } -- . L , . s , 4
. 3 ~
s- -a , , ~ n - > .
- s-v
- . .Ir --[- _
g = 6
) ei
- 9 i
)
g 3o, 9 9 -~ r l, ,
,a .
- s. i . a1 :e9 i =22 .
m= a , a w s. l q s v a a 1 1" L f
% w w =
N g ? c. um . si ) %C0
'w
- J 4 i s.
= a p, a h
4, ..s1
-3 s n E x s u
?'
pg h,. ? === 85
- tt "O
s tso y : ,a =s . ,
, - l ,
N 'c q , 2 2
% , w < - 9 g
4s 4 ~- 'h. = - 2 6 s' Q, -
.l 6 .S . . -
.~
g ; ?. .. . \ u
.a \t '.-ib .tf h:;e ~hh h '
5
- f
'h !
%y ~,
.; 2 3 +
ic$ 5 5 2, 1, . .
& 5EB 0
6
= 5,- .
1
,- j' ~ * ,
- o
$, E B B. .
- a. * * . t ,s..
117. o*-eiry f:, -
~
l . I i { .R c i 4 !", ? .% ( 1 t t
/ . < j 4
- m s 'g i
.,Jh va 10 I > Y, {
..!I .. ... . .~I U~E d * # 8 a
a g r- s
-q u
2 s l
'y >4 s,
q "t Q w s ! .a s t, As 1 & ;g. i
. I 1. s
't .n .N. '.*s.-
>_ l l '-
, j_ n V
! l.--: -- ,.-3 e .
,v s f[ ;,
..k e e, t --
e 7 :; = a s t < O ? 3 44%S < E i., , 21 4 y , c. s s s - s
.s
'9 .-.....
j iu . d o a
- a. -
e T. e s e 3 e ra 4- . 2 3 l *"*
~ 1,* .5 .I l 3 3 % , w ee u
.3 g * ( 4
,- e. .
I T . 9 , 25 = d *
= 4 l i'g~
R- 1,. *2 , s(
.-
/
f
'kw { gl " M #4 h m -4 h4 4 -
j ; :: SR ,
* /
b 3 g5 9 v. g , x < N M 2 05$ 2; a!!_Mu T4 O
-j a" I. a .: 4
\At e
T e. == 'l < s l As ; t q 1l 1
'-a F< n X
)\' ! ! !
- s s = ,
319**.
- . . . e
< we
.;s 4 3,
gs % ,'
, %l b..' .%.
ou i i.
- El ?
< 13 .J J *J 5 s n
_as. --
, 1 := := =: .
Js j ~i g iw .
,'$s
. , s -
5t i,l 2J J I : 2 = ' a, ' t a' o!.' e ss.
= a c , 4 4
.3 - ,
3 32 s .. o *- g (m qs 1 n e .; 1 .Y i w b = m > [ e
. G3 **
% T % %
(
$ 0 1 3 i w w w y p p I
S i ~~. ! '
,i22 s
3k I
- J e** i,ht '- ?- , . mi O! b
- V ** I e I h #
1 u
- ; w m -
y [7 'l; e a ) G c i
,h E
e'
, ,k ,
as 2 ( k Q ad
'O 4 9 =J
- 4' ..4 as
'*l I T-
"' .I. .N ' - .u-- w yl < , s e .d - .
- s -
. as i _- r - ..
(' > ::$ ji j E E l / Y E5
- - - l
.', ! BCB '
J ,* %tol s % ,j
!, 4 = '
j
. - .. e_p , i_ - .
---- 1 4 I e. 8 9
.mo.-pemme
-,-.n,- - - - - , . . , ---- - . .-.~,e, _ _ , -
=
- r
!m. 1
.a 1 i Cy 4
*D;...J g, * 'j......
e. g
.k ==
a l E
' #' . . ' . . ... . . 6 JI.Ll, E-Q-
-.u t t een x
m
,e s
t,
.)'
g< t i ,,a I ! I k I # , l O
.h5D q -
l i g
,l I'
s
.x .
I -
' k
^. _ ! -
4 ,, v
' e e yI I ] . . 'i %=s g e' '
m a 2, # y , Nj M i I t ~ 2 iii- ' :E .i i i c. = t -\ / 6-7. . ~ - ,
. s , -. _ .1 \'
3
- 5' '
= d'
' E 5) ~, * ~h.;
aDaE=3 I 2
*:4,0 3 '. \
.A gg i ~ ==
a .
,u : :! .. = =
y
= ol % s f
- TAE .l S: 3 ! d:
\
S = ' N 1 24iE d &' a~ Ey=, i,
)\
- - - a,, , 2
\4 q *"3
% W33 . y
'\
Al, i
') .
4' q S O . % ,;; as
)h .a*gd 4 6 0 Y5 EC $s 2*
m u'
- ll; ki y
\M C' e se i Nb
\ *$i l \ n $: ~~q'i m
- 2:
\
it si I = ? \< \ < \ v . ' 54 !)*.= 3 EE 'g , \ OC O
*J t ,I23 5
=
t'. 9 t v l i' 1 b. p 9 a g :s n --
~~
.2 2, 0,9 - - J.3 ~1 .y i' 2 2= C N i
u
- e g $
\w w .
L l 3 1
- i V
?
Ooc i y c 44%
,c c =
a' s, . p.t = < J t S. x ~ S p~ I T s 'y- o.s4 , C .I. $, gi' iU o M ! "2 )
~ A
!\
e! % 1 % C
" !;- %*g >?y .$ .
.. 3- T '
e *U J2 a~ '* .ll ; it' ' 5 To 4 w [
. " J. . us s. E us .
a - ob
'w : e h,
~
1 27 = := l - a H o.,
,e: e e c
,uM,V ~
,2. 1 a s d caa
g % --- g O' _J *= $ '
. - - =
1 c; .
. 6 o
' e a b
- t i f
t C o n.1.i t i o n .f o r A.I.t e r n a t i v e s to Shenron llarris CASil 237 McCauley St. Chapel 11111, NC 27514 915-967-6812
, .. . Q Mr. Harold L. Denton Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i
/hff kSf[I lkh
, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissiuq I' 8
Office of Reactor Regulation Washington, D.C. 20555 Q.
Dear Mr. Denton,
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 522, et. seq.), the Coalition for Alternatives to Shearon Harris (CASH), and Wells
. Eddleman, pro.se., requests copies of any, and all, NRC records and. '
information, including but not limited to notes, records, letters, memorana, drafts, miniutes, diaries, summaries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, engineering plans, drawings, flies, graphs, ' charts, handwritten notes, studies, data sheets, interum and final reports, status reports, and any and all records relevent to and or generated in connestion with the Petition for the issuance of a Show Cause Order, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202, as requested by CASH Petition to Institute Proceedings pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206, dated 2 July 1986. This request includes but is not limited to information gathered during the investigation into:
- 1. The activation of the Emergency Notification System, particularly the events of 28 June 1986, and the apparent noncompliance, by C.P.&L, and the North Carolina Emer*gency Management Of fice with the terms of 10 CFR Part 50, Appndx.
E, during that event;
- 2. The apparent dissemination of misinformation during the evening of 28 June 1986, by vartious organizations respon-sible under the Emergency Notification Systen (including out not limited to personel within SHNPP, Chatham County, Sheriffs Department, North Carolina Highway Patrol, and Mr. Mack Harris of the Media Department at C.P.&L; state the nature of the investigation, if any, which occured in light of the events of 28 June 1986.
, , 3. The prcspective changes in the Emergency Management' Plan in light of the incident on 28 June 1986.
- 4. Give all documents, as stated in paragraph one of this request, which are relevent to the invest 10ation of of C.P.&L, and Ms. Mirriello; particularly information concerning
' ~ '
the contentions, as stated in CASH's 2.202 request.
, ., , . /hks(Ar~
2.
- 5. Give all documents relevent to the investigation of
, , pipe welds, as stated in the Mirrello contentions, particularly
,the ,cvidence attached to CAS" 7. 702 petition. ,
6 Any and all evidence trhich was developed durihn the investination of the !!irriello contentions or reinted investigatiohs cnnecrning pos-sibin violations of the ASIE Doller and Pressure Vessel Code, section XI, Article Itm 3000 ( 1980 Edition of the Shearon Marris Pre-Service inspection Manuel).
- 7. The Directors investigation and evaluation of the Psycholnient Stress Argument, and particular reference to the events at Chernoble and 28 June 1986 8 Copies of any and all SALP reports concerning'the operation of nuclear power plants by C.P.f L. (Drunstrick Plant), nnd plants under construction by C.P.6L. (Shenron Marris Pinnt).
CASM requests that fees be waived, because finding that the information can be con-sidered as primati11y benefiting the public, pursuant to 5 USC 552 (a)(4)(a). CASM is a non-profit, public interest organization enmmitted to and concerned with the health and safety of it"s member, and of the surrounding communities, and is particuinely con-cerned about the potential harm which may result if adequate protective measures are not taken to correct the problems outlined in CASH petition for Show Cause. For any documents or portions of documents which you may deny due to specific FOIA ex-ceptions, please provide an index itemizing and describine, the documents and portions withheld. The index should provide a detnited justifiention for your'nrounds for einiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption if justified and reinvent to the portion of the document withheld. (This index is required by Vaunhn v Rosen I, 444 r2d 820 (D.C.Cir.1973), cert. denied. 415 U.S. (1974). Thank you for your continued cooperation, and we look forward to hearin:t from you. If I can be of on help please en11 at (919) 929-1870 or at the number listed on the ir terhead. , I S neerely, fig . %[cr/Committee Steven . Katz-CASM Le . 1720 Allard Road Chapel Mill, llc 275 q f cc: Local' Field Office Renionni 0Ffice o b
I .2 - 12-J I. proper: The Comission agrees ". . , that a nt; clear facility must meet all (Safety Standards before a license can be granted, and that a delay in licensing is actua'11y p' rope'r when movants raise important safety issues." SEE: 51 F.R.19539 i (May 30,1986). We note, that only delay to the proceedings attributed directly
- to the tardiness of the petitioner is to be taken into account. Long Island Lighting Co. (James Point Units 1 and 2),1- NRC 631,650 and note 25(1975).
The docuentation upon which this motion relies has only recently become avail-able. Further, the cumulative effect of evidence over time merits reopening. !' It is through no fault of movants that necessary documentation is not forthcoming from the NRC 10 (Note: attachedFOIArequest). 1he only delay in this proceeding is that which is proper in light of legitimate safety contentions and supporting evidence. The movants seek to reopen the record on the basis of arguments contained herein, on other evidence which has not been made public, and further moves for j hearings on such issues. 1 j This Motion to Reopen is respectfully submitted this 15 day of September, 1986.
/ W Wells Edc reman, Pro g
?]/ //]//0/V
~
fo's@hf. CASH Hushes dr. Durham, N.C. 604 W. Chapel 11 St. (919) 688-0076 Durham N.C. (9 682-3818 . l { fE I h/ "
] /(/j.. e $
t Fen P. Kptz fl hn 0; RuhUle
' CASH C unsel for conservation 604 W. Chapel Hill St. j ouncil of North Carolina 1
Durham, N.C. 307 Granville ' Road h (919)929-1870 Chapel Hili,<N.C, 27514 P
- , (919) 942-OfN !
1 I i 8 Oe
, _ . __*s.-__.__ ____m_ ____._._.-.A..______2___m .m .-m_-_ _ . _ . ..__ .____.__m. ______._..m_..____._.__.et}}