ML20210B696
| ML20210B696 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1986 |
| From: | Miriello P CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210B560 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8609180146 | |
| Download: ML20210B696 (15) | |
Text
'
July 28, 1986 Attachment 7 IN THE MATTER OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE EXIT INTERVIEWS AND THE QUALITY CHECK DOCKETED PROGRAM AT THE SHEARON HARRIS PLANT USN9C BEING USED BY CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT TO IDENTIFY NUCLEAR SAFETY CONCERNS '86 SEP 17 A9 :48 AND COVER UP. ,. g . , . .
AFFIDAVIT OF PATTY S. MIRIELLO ~-
Patty S. Miriello, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says the following:
- 1. My name is Patty S. Miriello. I live in Charleston County,S.C.
I was employed by Carolina Power & Light (CP&L) from February 1985 through August 1985 I worked at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (SHNPP), New Hill, N.C. and at the Brunswick nuclear plants ,
(BSEP ) , S outhport , N .C . I was employed as a health physics techni-cian and worked in radiation areas and was exposed to radiation and radioactive contamination in the course of my work at both plants.
(At SENPP there were radioactive calibration sources and radiochem-istry sources)
- 2. The purpose of this affidavit is state that the quality assur-ance Quality Check program was not being used as intended at the Carolina Power & Light Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.
- 3. The Quality Check Program at SHHPP is . operated by the quality assurance department. The Quality Check program is designed to allow any employee who sees any criminal activity or any activity that would effect the safe construction and operation of the nuclear plant-the opportunity to expose the problems confidentially to Caro-lina Power & Light. Quality Check form deposit boxes are located on the SENPP site. Quality dssurance exit interviews arm also ccnductr When an employee is terminating with any company (including con-tractors) at SENPP, the employee. is called in for an exit interview with the quality assurance department. The main question asked of the employee is: Did you see anything wrong with the nuclear plant?
The employee is then asked to sign a form stating that he or she did or did not see anything and indication of what the problems were which were observed.
8609180146 860916 PDR ADOCK 05000400 G PDR
Page 2 4 In February of 1985, I was employed as an engireer by Nuclear Energy Services (NES) in the inservice inspection (preservice in-spection) of the Shearon Harris plant. On February 25,1985, I began work with Carolina Power & Light and resigned from NES. Prior to leaving NES, Tom Brombach approached me and state'd that Jim Willis, the plant manager, called and requested a reference.4 Tom Brombach stated that he had provided a good reference on my behalf. Tom Brombach was the CP&L engineer in charge of the inservice (preservice) inspection at Harris. After this, Tom Brombach was notified by the quality assurance department that they wanted to have me in for an exit interview. This was to discuss what I had seen primarily while I had worked in inservice inspection (preservice inspection).
Prior to the quality assurance exit interview Tom Brombach and Phil Temple approached me concerning what I was going .to say. They were friendly. However. at this noint in time I felt that it would have been unwise for me to restate troblems which I had already brouEht to their attention in the nast. I had done my iob and I had informed my surervision: Tom Brombach was the CP&L engineer in charge of the inservice inspection, Phil Temple was a CP&L engineer in inservice inspection, and Stanely Pruitt was a CP&L inservice inspection spec-ialist. I went to these CP&L representatives with the following concerns:
- Tom Brombach - In November 1984, he was told of Conam inspection personnel missing a row of steam generator tubes during the eddy current inspection. He was told that John Camburn, Conam data analyst, had caught the missed tubes however, he was urged to look further into the matter by myself. I was told that the matter was beinz looked into.
- Tom Brombach and Stanely Pruitt - In July or August of 1984, I indicated to these men that I had found between 10 to 20 welds that had been cut out or reworked. The inservice inspections had been done on the old welds. No new inspections were completed. Therefore, the inservice inspection reports on these welds were now false..I was told that it would be taken care of.
(Phil Temple knew of my concerns on these matters also.)
- Tom Brombach - In January of 1985 was given two copies of the same
Q Page 3 inservice inspection report of the weld identified as 1-ISI-RC-23.
One copy was of the ultasonic weld inspection report which showed indications and the second copy was of the weld inspection report where the indications had been taken off the report and the problem was now being identified as beam redirection. The second report was to be placed in the files instead of the first report which was to be destroyed. I was told to do that by Ron Saunders.
So I did what I thought was right. I took both copies to Tom Brom-bach and asked if something was. wrong. He said. not to worry that the renorts were all right. (See attachments 1 and 2, page 4.)
- 6. Therefore, when it came to informing the quality assurance -
department during my exit interview of these problems; there was no need to. So in relation to the matters of:
- a. Missed steam generator tubes during eddy current inspection,
- b. Inservice inspection reports invalidated by rework, and
- c. Inservice inspection reports being replaced by additional documentation not based on reinspection; I did not inform the quality assurance personnel. Other CP&L nersonnel told me not to worry and that matters ~had been taken care of.
I In addition. I was not leaving the Harris site and I felt that this so called exit interview was irrecular. I was simolv goine to work in another building at the Harris site. If I said anything about safety problems; it would certainly tip off CP&L as to what to cover up and it would probably result in retaliation against me.
Consequently, I consider thequality assurance exit interviews as worthless in identifying nuclear safety problems. This is an internal company interview and it can be used be CP&L unscrupulously.
Fortunately, when it came to the problems with drug abuse by the Conam eddy current inspectors; I had sent the FBI a letter about that in November of 1984 I knew that CP&L would never admit to a drug problem at Harris.
Page 4 l
7 On my last day of work in August of 1985 I was given another j CP&L exit interview with the quality assurance people. This time I was really leaving the Harris ulant site and I decided to state that I had seen nuclear safety troblems. However, I wouldn't tell
)
the quality assurance people what they were. In August of 1985 I had been told that I had been under surveillance at Brunswick, Now if I was under surveillance, then CP&L knew what the safety concerns were which I had looked at,at least at Brunswick. No CP&L management employee approached me at this time with a statement about what I had seen at Brunswick and what corrective actions would be taken.
Therefore, I told-the quality assurance exit interviewer that I believed that the interview was designed to find out what was wrong and to cover up. When I filled in the exit interview form; I stated that remark or a similiar indication of lack of trust.
- 8. In retrospect, the FBI never did anything with the tip that Conam personnel were using drugs and doing steam generator inspections at nuclear plants all over the United States. CP&L did get around to looking at their steam generator eddy current data. But it was only after months had passed. When CP&L started to investigate late in August every area I had worked in with the hope of finding out the nuclear safety concerns I had ( As I believe they wanted to cover them up): CP&L found out that I had voiced some concern about the steam generator inspections. Therefore CP&L had the Electric Power Research Institute take a look at their eddy current data from the steam generator inspectio'ns. However, this was months after I brought the matter to the attention of Tom Brombach.
9 It is my belief that the quality check confidential reporting forms are used in the same way as the quality assurance exit interviews.
The main purpose is to coverup nuclear safety complaints, before someone as myself figures out what is going on and goes public.
. 7 lUt l'2LL Patty J. Miriello
! ! , & /, , / *, M,fn n,.f,,
.. j s ,F . i . . m : , ,.
NClary D hl - ts t .*
W idQH bl@etc; Q [,;j)l
- a
. ;. 8 IS7"Sbl-O 9 Qeg.:.2 r,
- B i~ 3DI ^ 19 Plant /Unic .I,l/dp/ # / __ Page / of S~
Comp /Systemf 6 be G L. # _ CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Data Sheet No.I3r ro/-c39#-
Procedure No.rr . f o /
g f.p.y Loop u/3 ~
Subj ect : 9. 0, a o L M cA.f criocu emr.
Rev/ Change No. 'I c4 Tyetwiru m e m tvee Calibra* ion semn Ane!.ed'f %de f/,eu Block No. OT.Oc-l Mf e /Model No. :k G nsL- 3 !
Fabrication No. 9/s Serial No. e S // 5"7[c- Fixturine (i a vi? Ided-e- Surface 0,O.
Sweee teneth - 7 80 sevi, e. T,se we. l- A Block Te=p 4A, U ry.e t fy7 S I " Isoael Comp. Te=p L rry-o r yo "F Swees Delav 7. 70 SI-e & %-,-
Thickness . 772 "
pulse tenre' /Sa- .<-c hJ v - . ~ .- r ,. 2. K -r41 st L CRT Calibrated in nw reno.29.57e,. e= e e WA c,-< . , vf/f".'.*.f Auws </ WeM A n-Each !!aj. Screen Div= _ 3f7" Filter: M/dVideeN/JJack8 we.g,-.4 a-,t. 4f, meteriew 43*
g y si & frestowe /~.,pyh U. n.
n er /e,-. c e4 - s <35 o,.. 7 f c,si . a . . c , . .s. 4L. 4. WOT Med, sei -- M Ove 4.UM c -, .- 1 , - - 3.,-e .f[ttMen e t 3T_
e.a re-,-..WA'e r eWh . #Nr ce,m T s-- n = e-u - *%336 8
e .. e . . . . . .. . .#% s */ 100 DAC PLOT 0 t.T3 i , I s I , I a I s hn l l 6 0v '1 INST =.. trEu--v CAL . l l $
Ame11-2de 70 === To Wald l
'Tieh! Lev! !Minh lLov 60 g ; g ;y q l ! To Wald
8 100l f/ l l (to l Jo I l l iM l W t
' ' ' \1 "''''~~
2 l 90 l 9/I 6 l I'D l X
'3 L fD l fd l 7 l 40 l Sd 20 g 3_,,, W d4 l
10 Cire .rt ./f7 4 70 l Jfl 8 l Go l /f noinnlon' in vno unlnnlini on in-u ruv em-s m e m i, e-,-
0 1 2 g4 5 h7 8 .o g0 Inicial! d3 Resule Recordable 80 l -4 yy EIAMINATION Indication s COMMENTS / REASON FOR INCC)LDLETED SCAN (S) i WELD / AREA Yes. No l Geom 80 -12 /7 g,gg,g g y/j v/4 lXI c ., ,.g , t,. q , . . . .C . . ,
40 +6 82 N l l G.-% O c\e < _ Ao- +e I
( 20 l +12 l M \ ! I E -M' F * 't
! N CALIBRATION CHECK! TIME \
Inicial Cal. O F20 Incermediate X Incermediate Intermediste EXAMINERS 1 *F* / # Date//f'PJ" Level 2cr i
Final Cal. / Job 2@h, 'f-l1 _
' , Date /-/9-frLevel /
~
, ADDITIONAL SHEETS 7 CHECK B3x REVIEWERS 1 Date Coneinuseten n,,,otne 2 Date j se,,i -, e, D<b., . r4 3 Date
~
NUCLEAR ENERGY SEAVICES. INC.
. - h g8
8 o
b3 $a4 l
/
I. t a
- _
- ra /
" n u _ '"
)
" 1:
/
/r l // s/r
.L* ,, _
gJ 4
/
t o
n A A
u a d
- L, . - - 1
- h A As r /
- A M A
di )/s r
7S 2 d' m e
c t ?
f E
?7 kR K d"M
. - dr *o/
C
. , [' l.
.g *
- j s
A hn f r
e A 1 4 ai<
/
@ A' l
N
- D e u t 6
- I R 'n r /e f .1 !
fa f 'r/n S
E - lo i }d 1 A
C
- : g ,j r
/ w r r E
'Ae s-I A t I
V - ' e t
- r h d -r
$ i N/ b*
v ,'l 8'
fe
, ff ' x R h b
/ ' f o m A k f4 ' '
E
- o x s f s e S ' r r /r Fu c on 1 f s Y I w p A WJ jte G
R )
e<
/7 d
d e%' s s
. . r j' E r .*
- N ) a c t f kA f.r e E
R ~
Q -
d kw u c U.
S L o
A A f h
st A I f a f E.
l w t e s
( (h R B
p m
4 *,l J
/
s C Te n . . R a es 'j
- f U So i o pp \
N P
)
f o nt s
- s mm e aa r
xx L
)
0 5
X A A & $
'l
- l f .
jar &,
- A
~ a m H . '
Y '~ D u nu ,
y/ S mHH MdQ i
n bV l i *
- W da " l a.
lW /1 a x ff .f d a oo x h 3
/
o/
c m a S. s ld1 l M// d %% m 0 t i $ b .
( e t 00 9l h a 55 .
s c S. I e
t e
R t a . t t an* % X I I a a t U. g 0 A ^~ t N D P A S L 5 H odd t l l eu X (ww A H P a
V
/
94
/
f.
[
g m mm D H A / 0 5 o oo r r r l
lA 4 f f f W
'?c j K -
' 9 "1 g,j e ee C S '04 l r 5 c cc n nn A%
l 0 2 f.O i
/d /(/ 7 l
4 a aa 5 W f r t t t ng s su nP o, 0 i D DD il a o $ J f i
t i
t g n
X A
P H
- f. Y.
/
l e
a a n H
~
0 c c l i a o u n m D L L W -
- o a W WW F S
- r L W ic r 3 f n M 2 O
' n s W p o E E E
_ / ,
i T T T
- ~
~
f t a
- A A A c0 Y y D D D
/ y e Y P 9 n f f ## , l m A H s e :
/
A' * ,. # ,
f u et H /. E R
/# , R a E C 'd' t
a e D l
l S
e " n,. w k "S i
S t
j q
cm ao B r u W "fo y J{
T O
L n f P t, A i t g a E c [a ninnce o
S f
i g, l i a I f C A
D 3
L r/ p s
L A
C S
t n
aat t ms J N 's tc c
d I
e gn r e
n eei HRD L
L U
R R R E E E U u W e{
j( i i i
F E E E o
m ra m
a
'ma R d
'q W I
V v V i I r t x x PB n o f 6_ A R
E E E P i E E HRL I N D
R R R
' ' Ii
k ) / '}
NUCl. EAR ENEllGY SERVICES,INC. -
Project No. Site L* Location Dates (M0/Dap/Ys') ~
$ (C (~ fSN// /2 D*/ao b ///9/ W
'"' " #~ "#"
i t em lalen t i f i c a t)pp ,.,,, .,pe.,yj IloLocation Page .7 of . S' ,(
ar ctd G. ,
Bf stJ-@
g.- *a, %, _
Examina g g j, p4 vol Jn: ngle 0 I f. 5 _s. 45= Attached Cal. Data Sheet --l Esaminor Lv icasiing g 9 I _s - -
HP Hetal Path W max Distance from ( to S.U. at maximune response. * *" Y RBR Remaining Back Reflection L Distance from Datum 0 W liistance frne weld at 50% of Hax amp. (fwd) - - - - - - - - - ' ' * *
- W Distance from walal 'at 50% of Hax amp. (hackward) -
i, Ind. I FWD llACKHARD Lg a W HAY snr HAX HAX Ly RBR S.U.
l_ , ]
]
- f 50%
dl- ;itt* ["]
W HP Wg HP Uy llP r 50% max 50% amp Loc. : '
No. DAC '
RDIARKS HAX HAX 2 13' o. 9 " o 84 " o. so " o. u " o.fr ' o.73 "
- aAw
- Y Ase sv.* 4 so,e love m e t MA sw '
ufrimi </// ,1 nursa s-s?,/.</r 9 20 1 %' o Es
- JJf* e.7)" J YC' o. 9.I ' F o.f cw
Y )pf n ,:lk,.,,,fes4t, for gro*,f v ort / w / sura /ader 6 da c. i3
~
sjo p. Y ' o. fr ' c. >
ut' R ittor si 4 Y i, .r.ar r. -J,s *a L s e 7 se ,e ,r a><e f Ne w no ne,- i.aVade aMJsA ss
'l 20 038' sJi c.15 ' s yt' r n' her ' ' &4r/ ^ Y Erafree w M b da//*** 7 (Airre's +tVs PJC s/ L/sen / ctor
' #"#' 86 y (D 7.'l.Ir d# e-8 g , ,
IRAW FULL SCALE PLOT llERE:
lI lll }" ' ly Jf ' j"' '
1
I l 7 Nx <
N
\
REVIDJER DATE \ ' '
DATE N
REVIDJER .
f / pe/*
REVIDJER DATE ,
I
. - ,,,,,r c. i..in si. ii.,< ,,,,< ,-< /~- .s a ;
i O -
g
C1 .
any ) .
NUCt. EAR ENEROY SERVICES. INC.
Project No. Site L*Location Dates (Mo/lb.p/Yi-) , '
< t- {f rs/W/"Z f*/co W ///f/VS ,
'"** *"'"*'* 1Ja 1.ocation Iteen Identifica,g lon f.jjf.gg _ a y Page 9 _of 5'
, pffy q, , ,'y t
,u Emininer: X nulu 45[
8 Attactied C;st. Data o ' _
Tp got O 4 5"_4. \* . ,,
E= amine C-1 u v e, sea inning g,, ,. I _, - -
__ _ __J HP He tal,Pa tti .. ,
RBR W man Distance from ( to S.U. at maximum response.
Remaining Back Reflection W Distatice f rase weld at 50% of Hax amp. (fwd)
L Distance from Datum 0 9 1 --:-- .- - - - - " * *
- tilstance f rom wuld e
- nt 50% of Hux amp. (hackward) -
t, I
Ind. I FWD BACKHARD 1.g L RBR S.U. *
- W MAY ' int HAX 50% HAX 2
L f_ , j dw :iri*
<- J[,- j 50% max 50% amp Loc. Cr*
2 No. DAC
- RDMRh' HAX HAX 8 % o. s tre o.fr s e's e. fr /)2 at kiw
- Y A-gare sis ,aist,ds see., no*
4 /& o. 7 d17 0.40 0.93 o en
/ou
" ~
r ra ' ?k p/
Res,ri sl/es x/ea//s s/ erris ms/Jud.s '
. sse.4 - se s e
/0 Je /. 4.o Jjs / if .701 f.60 132 4 ctre.' A /* Se/m. .co ago,rtir s,ana, a t it 20 .? <! " 16f' 2.2f "
- t. s 7 ' ) 4* s.12 " # kru A f)e -ets ,,a/J pr co or hoffsn er s><ld e,21' # 5 12 20 oJS p. M " o.Cf 0.68 Oli kru /r*fe reher& Ds7/S nef f 4/A eaa//14 esfinte cast /
r$Edloer k anaA/sv }/5besir
. nsig/, . --
DRAW FULt. SCALE PLOT llERE: A'r#ste g Me e CW) I@
, O 0 * '11 _sg .1Y y
I REVI EWER DATE .. ,
{ i ,' ^
REVIEUER DATE , \ ' +
REVIDJER DATE '.'s, g
gs
$*** b .
-. .. ~ ,,wsn . , . .~ ,i~ .., e. . -
k k
o
'* O
--= .
,3 Wroj:ctlilo S!ta I.,lecation
- C(i,, 51W/ J/ tbt.o
- c/
Dates (HQ/Idi/Ya')
- m: s- *s -4 6'- e s
_ stir /VS
- ua1.ucatsun ,,
, S t ates IJesit i f icar lose g,fggy P.nua ( af C' .
e.. , ,'s g ,, , ",,m, _
Ia.r 3ggjgvg "~ 4igl{
n* 4 s*t 4s'; " At*aa*d Cal "a'* ,, 7 Emmeln.a r -IA Lava-v '/_-
() for s . *, . icennisig
.n na J n ifd6 A
Tlalcknous
.77)
Dimenotaar luom. ) 6
\*,{,j,/
\i HP Het al 'Pa ris R58
. W imas litstance f rom g to S.U. at maulenium response. ..u g RemainlnR Rack Reflection y pg,g,,,, g ,,,, ,jni d L Distance from natum o g,L at 5GI of Haw a sa p . (fud) --g-- -!* - -*-***
g g , , ,,,, g ,,,, ,, g ,g , .at 50% of H.au aug. . (Isackward)
- g, l Ind. I FWin MACl(llARD L 8 1.g RRR S.U. -
W tg1_ snr HAY _ Sil! HAM 2 of
' l ,_,, dW IL*r*] ["} l I
W HP Ug HP ll HP SOE mau r-Ho. DAC 2 50% amp Loc.
HAN RDIARKS HAX jr go & o.}ls' d 0. 69 ~ G' s.9V A & Yrw
- Y 7
$ R- s" Ard-WAo' * *m s sxA*/on/u//s w 1w w M/' :
- 4/sr4.,Ls '
- /
- /
p
- /
- 7
- /
GRAW FULL SCALE PLOT llERE: - - - - -
I
- x~
REVIDghnTil $3tiflfje[g DATE /N d T"I' ' -
i ,
REVIEWER DATE .
s.7#
j REVIB#Eg DATE . W Arin 1-DKS s
t
.-...,_.6-....-__.,, .. .
___.5?.??,
- - A9 9IV^'l-A1 tf Page of .S~ g r3 Pitnt/ Unit 8//2/p/ "/ /
Da ta Sheec No. f.T7" TD/C" 24 f1* #
C wp/Systeme,,Ar r ,i.. t CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Procedure No.mf r . ro/
150j.ju .p. y Loop u/3
Subject:
- 9. r:8oo f McM Rev/ Change No.
- M l tverstners r er-ttvt e trioru trut-Calibration Mf e / Mod el No . tk G (! AL- 3 I se sn Anet.. //f" Med f/re.e4 Block No. OT- S o -l Fabrication .No. N/s
$+ rial No. -
2 /1 S"9[e Fixeurtne fikYvi- M e d . e- Surface O.O.
free tenech - 7. 80 Sevt. 3- tva. W. I*M Block Temp % U f9 e! sd UI E*od e Comp. Temp % Tr9-o f 7e T
$ren Delav 7. 70 st-. 4 eb.a.- . 772 "
Thickness Pu t se taneeS/53- *- hJ v .-...- v 3 . K .<a 4 r_ car e,tt3,,,,e 1, ,,,
Yh s -*et A \\ %3 N W Nl b'* H' Feee . ? O . $ 'te~ . 1.s - . 'te sa r Each Maj .' Screen Div= . If7
- 9. w - .,8 2-et . US, me 4/ ecie6 I* Sa'N ra ass
~
Filcert 4/d v'd ee MTae'< 2 g y yo M** frneawe,/wyn/h %2.(*)
n er /c.s . e u 4.
s en s ,- ,. 1 y lr ,st . . - . c. v . --w h b WOT Mede sa t ** - M 0 2 * --W 'a r - -' ,-- e -,-.s .t_0++r s o e \ X S N A3EA c, e ....hk e d/fs . % h..-t.-- 3..-u. *i336 ,
. , e.. . . . .., . f% f '/- 100 DAC FLOT 0* Mt7 I s 1 1 i a i q o f
90 1 I t
- ; ; ; ; , no ,,,,, h7r; ,
INSTR. t rms--r int .
70
== To Cald l ur ti- de lRish! tav! lWith! tov l l t ( lM M l -- l 1 To Neld l
(. ")r l 100l ,S"I l e l (eo l 30 l l I l l TN l l\ < '*-'-"-
2 90 l 9/l 6 l .fo l g I I I I I I 20 I
1 .,97 a3 TD l fd l7l 40l 30 K
3 , ,
4 l 70llfl3l del g to g g ;g ,, ,,,,, g, ,; g g , g g ,,; ng ,n, g ,, gi_= gg cy ,
m ,. ,. ~ -- . . - m , -
0 1 2 4 5 h7 8 .o'.g0 Inici.21l d3 lResui: Recordable ladiescien s COE.'".T!5/RZASCN TOR :
l lJf ELuiUA !ON 80 4 UC::MPT . u TC.uf (S) -
WEI.3/M M Tes lNo lG4cm 8 -12 O i - er ,so - es I AW l ^6 XI c ..m ,i , t. G I. . m
'O +6 l 82 N I I I O.,% L d, <
- c. m % f 20 l +t2 l 12 \ l I l <z --h a
\ l l
CALI3 RATION C'4?T TT:4E \ I l
Inicial Cat. l c g.:ze \ l 1
\
Incer=edi.2ce l g Incermedisca l P ~ i..u-es '
Incermedisee l ELuiDERS 1 #-g< Dace /pr1.r Level m-TLnal Cal. >fycb v 2Ws 1,/ LL Daee /./5-frtave1 -
~
H/dLA .
ADDITIONAL SHIITS? CHECX BOY RE7IE'a'E23 Ipn'n5fd cG't rndersDate /-74-9 7 :
,Iontinume % lh e..., ot , e NI 2 Dace ,
3 ..,,, . ., c4. . u 3
~ '
. NUCt.EAA ENEFGY SERVtCES. INC.
s .* .
g.5_ ~ '
NUCt. EAR ENEROY SERVICES,INC.
Project Wo. Sita L*Location listas (Ho/lbf/Y:-)
J'rsr ravM i st zwax $ issr/92 uoLocation e. .
, i t .no Islentification ,.,3f. g .22 g,p Paga ,2 of J %
y,.,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, , *=,,_,_
4!aumleser s Tg gu,g) AssHia 8 6 4 Ss. 4 %'$ AE E"'I'"'I Cu l . lies a n Slicet [
\a 11sichnuun it=== l ae r s u-lA l.uvun r ;,,,,,,,
,, , ,e ,rr)
,,,__,,,,,,, & .k.*. y , ,,, ,,,) p
/ g 2,r A...,m, .s g
- 56d.t pl#L*SE! !E_l!!!!!!!d # ,
itP He t al 4'a s ta 'W man '*"
RRE Illutancu f rom y to S.U. at seau fmum response.
Remaining tack bioflection
. l. Distance froan Datum u W liistanca f reue idl.1 at 50% of Blax amp. ( f usi) --
-l-- --
W lituaance f rom wal I
- mt SUI of Hun amp. (laschwaral) -
'In 3, 3 IIACKilAltli "
FH(1 1.g HRR S.U.
u bl& L jant HAX 5tlZ HAX g* 17 l _,; j -d- s* 1 i Il '
][,"g 11 50% mau 50% amp Loc.
2 No. DAC RDtARKS HAX llAX 1 ,1o c lY spy" p. s c s 9p" sW
~
sir" d oilso_
^ s A -
re anar//s. tera rf r.nr fi er's
,,,, A f , -
vr -
~ * ~ * ., s 4Y is 2. r>~ s <> jx s. vi ,
so' ise A o.rluo K s Are _ os se.,.e/it, so.m, a.,, ao e.a,w 31 /0 PSA .O ($_ #Y O pf 66Y L* Yi # At/dir /
t N 2 Ralstre ImahAll 'I I" i A.*/ 9 1t9 er 2 /"
\ ser ><,,) 6 / s.usMr ie/<lis*1A<s-
\ ifa/
\_ #
fit /1& c'st/s/4t"lf4/// A/'"
N n L .ustisi Arra/abr. -
[I#' '###r * .e . 8* , &c DRAW FULL SCAL.E PLOT HERE: (f lf
\
g'* 'g' j[* 'l' I I
[ l
- 4_
\ I 3 REVitbilald SaullderS DATE /-2S f.I w w T
s ..
REVIEWER DATE . s
- D s
REVIEWEA DATE ,
' ~
$ 0 I w
'4 t.
.I
\
p., ,
_ yJ -
. ** '} -
t Prsject No. Sits I.*l.ocation D:cci (Mo/Ibi/Yi-) ~
SCC, (~ MN// // /hAoa 8 /// W W *
, . 1 Item identifScat)9p ,.,'# " '"
g, .,7( .,3 Wa t.ocatton) pag G. P.nga .7 of - I' *i e i
'" a =gy , y_ a a a a R Act]a o d __
cammiop,pippoi - 4o;i.ig 4s t 4s=
'9 5 -
5 L \- ,j / .
e mania or 0-IA t.uwat I f //) pf A., -.1.1 ; canning A
- /
- _s -
s_. =l
.a u %ita /4 .A niamaral_.in!!ed f- -
HP Hatal Patin :I kBR Remainiseg Rac'd llaflection W ma x . DistancefromytoS.U.atsmaximumresponsa. **"f W Dia.tancefroessbidCat 50% of Blax amp. (fud) {
- t. Dissance f rom Datuas 0 u plutanica f ruen wal.1 e at 50% of H.ix manp.(laackward)
-i-- -i - - ~ ~"*"'
g, j ' '
tud. I FWD 11ACI UAltp '
I.g y* I.) RBR S.U. I U
"f blAX _ _.$ilt HAY . _511Z HAM f _- d t-- 'La e-]
["I} '
W HP Wg HP W.j HP Sox ima x 50% amp Loc.
F
" - ' J Ho. DAC ,
hag RDIARKS HAX 2 . 11~ o. 9 ' n SC
- aso" p.12 " o. W o it '
- o >Tw e W Ap'r w,, y s,,, y,y ,, , y w fw e i.trmasu.imirieNsi,/. iso -
9 20 _s 1i
.93+* 1 tr ' o. W .s vi' o 9.I' r o. r 'r' s=
- Y e'sA s;r ski.losMifor no* A/
vursob ni A/er h _dO Oi / 93 $.Y & f/ 0) //f N Afgo) A MearP fA
- / 6
- T te.9 ef toelf /* 9e w n o' rie r i A J d e ro/ J 's h )s 9 20 o JU' > .a t' a vi '
/ f t' e 12' ser' d pas f
- k sseras, g,v/ bJos/es 7 exare/r +tYo pj<
e s e/ k.Jun /cw sWas ts' W (1) sk sRAu ruu. SCALE Fl.DT HERE: j 8 8
's .* Y.s a y
- C'" , ,,, g f.,6[ ,
g N <
L N x s$
REVIEWhbnal[ aundef5iATE['/d M REVIEUER DATE g .
REVIEUER DATE ,
N'"# # Y 8
4 ,i
. g ,,,yc caras p /Af *<l/x /Je/t w 'l dw! /"* ^~'***^'" 4,
- N M s.23.e5 .,
.t I
J e
b
I
+ ,
117- 4~o/-ejry i f . .,, . \
y . -
s i
! - C1 I .I -
Crv c:.N )
l
. ru- i t 4r h++ @
' .a i - .-: i . s, t.
i 3 4
. -j s
- . = .
4 N;p-. '( 't----y1,g'y
- t. r. ,
. \
j .
s t h:,
= . , 1. , . 2. _.
4 i . , .
ts s,
$ M i i-s t, S 1 -I s %
l l 9 '
4 E- t e w ..
t.
,.l q, .
J-- l
.u s ,e e
e s . 9.. ~.-
9
- e 3 .s E ! m
= = 1 5 i t i ",--
" 1 m 3 4 4 m t x ;
E i
.~6 3:
- x ' , . , s-h .......
'i N = ' g.
4 s D i g ;; = a e s e d e - -:
- E :- aa 1, _.
, , . == ~ ._ .
m a w . -l 3
n
- . ; 9 s
x= : e :S
- 4 4 5 T t* L = m
~ 'i* 22 C
m * -- /L Il h b m - = .
3 S 1 %
!, u
]j:38
. 1** a
,e 3
,t .t A .E ,_
/
- =ees= = * - - - -
at. ._.S f .=
- 4 = u .=a :-
- *
- O Y 5
= ,= . . m. _J _.' - ,
O t T w T. - . ".
\k e M 3 5 m g g M Oj T
] !! $ N k t .
<> . : : : 2 ,
a
- a g g 3 y e . g g g
% Y l N g . . . ,, = c s s 3 <s 94 .
NN et 8'
e'c Q .. =t = ==
a % A A on 3 3% 3 M a. g h L b *e ,
3% = 2d2l5 a-E * *
'} " N
- o. .
3o - ,3 e ndi' se ssa
- _n C w 9'
= = na - h
- k e y s
. y 2 -- s < s s e
% 0 m u u N - - >
<c
>4 > ,
b ** .e:
N a
- e uW- g g , g g g 5 % h:;" 2.5 y !! ss * . a3 w '
' t. S s % ma Y w g Q
, t' 9 .9 w y i
o w e D kj'
- s< u a .*
,e A q g (s 9 C
3
'.g.:= E8- #
( 3
~
! U *
. 6 % s 9 Sc4
! e '
. e en u
, <ae
- l. .u. u u -u s z
- I N == M e (* 4 g g g U
', l. :14 y .,h *. I "
- m M m
/ ~$
a e..
w w r . . . . .- far u u 3 s X-2 2 I
- 2 U .s. 3 2 la. 3- *Q Q W Q 66 m a s s *
- *- /
i i
i 0 . -
=
3 :
= ==> -
d j St.s 4 j
, m. B. B. . .
a
=
s e
I
,e
u
- n. L
. i1 - I ..
Eq 4.
, 'N I A
,=Qe*r l r-Q-.
r >
t.
s 1
\'
e n %,::J.
, ;---qrtl.g O;
., . _ u :: .
8
- f -
~ [:
{ 11 - /
! /
'4 li .
! J-l
- - } l 1 /
- ,s
_1 4 g , ~
~3 - a i Q
\ ,i
~ == ;
Y R, .i ~ 2 -
- t
\ l u.
,M ,
h i.f
\
, , ~ . .
- .. u L 3 y nn d + g.
.. M .
l ~
qm - x q13 . ' .i a '
';. % ! ~3 m ~~ z 't l h' e =
\, , ,
, g u , 3== a I
3 1
] !_ '=1'=. .E .E
( T2 g
. :2 i g' 2 " .* .
- 3,. _= ou:U" J
- 5 e .g; y '1 3" m. .e l
\'\ 33 ,
% d u213 4 s k k5 $. ! !!
4 i-s e
s u u N s '- : :: 2 =
~
=5s -
t s .a t 24 is E EE l' i' -
l Ot ;15 . = 6 % )
w -
0 U 2 i
- E. = 5 ( F g i j- j 3 3 ti- ~ v j ,o < 5 ~.i ' =IE
==
% 'N '
,N
< s Y Y, Ul p
- s n
? .
,1 2 a m '
b
).: #*
, s s 2 , = a. L s I -
- i '
\ C S ) R s
u 4
,3 N, ' , *!.
. = a q I IN e" % 3 of i *
$h n
,h , .k * *
$ k a .
3 _%)2?
- as
~
E $ S
-u -a : ; a.a .
a s_gg zu 2 3 u , , _ _
2 :
i s e: 1 ,. 2 4
.: 4
]
, 5
== E E. .
O e
9
_. __________.____--.-__________._____.__-___m- _ _ - -
. . . . . , . , ~ , . - .m ., _
Ters 80245 ATTAciSc 3 3
~5/84 .
q07 Case Namoer (A.ssigned by QCP Coordinator) ,
EMPLOTIE EXIT Q1.'ESTIONNAIRE Were you provided o entatloc on the Harris Nuclear Prajact quality Cbeck
, 1.
progras? Yes No[
- J. . Have you reported any concerna or alienations in regard to the design, fabrication, constructi n, test, s tarta- ' or inspection of the Harris.
Nucisar Project? Te,s No .
- 3. If you reported concarns or allegaci'cas, were j the results satisfactory? ,
YesC NoO 1 ,
===e91c=6tp 4
Doyouhaveany]re==Nasconcer'asorelleganicaswhichyouhavenocreported?
Yes No If answer is YES, complete QCR forma -
- 5. What is your / reason for lear <ing the iscris Nuclear Fro et? -
lA C.<.M 1, t2 . AA- M .
ity check hport form may be usted at some later time for reporttits
. Th3 estached Q concerns or allegations which you'say havs reported previously withou: satisfactory recults or ich you have not .: port A /
OOYY U Data __. k"l Y ~
Signatura 7 dd - Ncer? j WY 1 Data Commenced Work Name ATM M /27 /Af6'L./ O (print) at Harris Projec'c
. kN ,
l Address _
NO, $j J2D M _
Telephone No. d -
N' AHL E i GH, A/. Q. 2 76 O' Tha QCF Cecedinator or one of his representatives will assist if needed in ;
i filling out thia form or the attachment.
j . Dace 2."/ h - I I N3ces: $ "' Lo t ln A
.,u &) H -
- y. h W f & h C k kW
- 0
. Y /u d wJA uW l'[C18 c,tdinator c:p Represe ive
Attachment:
Quality Check Report form (To be provided to employee) i :
i i
.