ML20210B696

Affidavit of Ps Miriello Stating That QA Quality Check Program Not Used as Intended at Facility

ML20210B696
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	07/28/1986
From:	Miriello P CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20210B560	List: ML20210B556 ML20210B647 ML20210B696
References
OL, NUDOCS 8609180146
Download: ML20210B696 (15)

Text

'

July 28, 1986 IN THE MATTER OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE EXIT INTERVIEWS AND THE QUALITY CHECK DOCKETED PROGRAM AT THE SHEARON HARRIS PLANT USN9C BEING USED BY CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT TO IDENTIFY NUCLEAR SAFETY CONCERNS

'86 SEP 17 A9 :48 AND COVER UP.

,. g.,..

AFFIDAVIT OF PATTY S. MIRIELLO ~-

Patty S. Miriello, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says the following:

1.

My name is Patty S. Miriello.

I live in Charleston County,S.C.

I was employed by Carolina Power & Light (CP&L) from February 1985 through August 1985 I worked at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (SHNPP), New Hill, N.C. and at the Brunswick nuclear plants (BSEP ), S outhport, N.C.

I was employed as a health physics techni-cian and worked in radiation areas and was exposed to radiation and radioactive contamination in the course of my work at both plants.

(At SENPP there were radioactive calibration sources and radiochem-istry sources) 2.

The purpose of this affidavit is state that the quality assur-ance Quality Check program was not being used as intended at the Carolina Power & Light Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.

3.

The Quality Check Program at SHHPP is. operated by the quality assurance department.

The Quality Check program is designed to allow any employee who sees any criminal activity or any activity that would effect the safe construction and operation of the nuclear plant-the opportunity to expose the problems confidentially to Caro-lina Power & Light.

Quality Check form deposit boxes are located on the SENPP site.

Quality dssurance exit interviews arm also ccnductr When an employee is terminating with any company (including con-tractors) at SENPP, the employee. is called in for an exit interview with the quality assurance department.

The main question asked of the employee is: Did you see anything wrong with the nuclear plant?

The employee is then asked to sign a form stating that he or she did or did not see anything and indication of what the problems were which were observed.

8609180146 860916 PDR ADOCK 05000400 G

PDR

Page 2 4

In February of 1985, I was employed as an engireer by Nuclear Energy Services (NES) in the inservice inspection (preservice in-spection) of the Shearon Harris plant.

On February 25,1985, I began work with Carolina Power & Light and resigned from NES.

Prior to leaving NES, Tom Brombach approached me and state'd that Jim Willis, the plant manager, called and requested a reference.4 Tom Brombach stated that he had provided a good reference on my behalf.

Tom Brombach was the CP&L engineer in charge of the inservice (preservice) inspection at Harris.

After this, Tom Brombach was notified by the quality assurance department that they wanted to have me in for an exit interview.

This was to discuss what I had seen primarily while I had worked in inservice inspection (preservice inspection).

Prior to the quality assurance exit interview Tom Brombach and Phil Temple approached me concerning what I was going.to say.

They were friendly.

However. at this noint in time I felt that it would have been unwise for me to restate troblems which I had already brouEht to their attention in the nast.

I had done my iob and I had informed my surervision: Tom Brombach was the CP&L engineer in charge of the inservice inspection, Phil Temple was a CP&L engineer in inservice inspection, and Stanely Pruitt was a CP&L inservice inspection spec-ialist. I went to these CP&L representatives with the following concerns:

• Tom Brombach - In November 1984, he was told of Conam inspection personnel missing a row of steam generator tubes during the eddy current inspection.

He was told that John Camburn, Conam data analyst, had caught the missed tubes however, he was urged to look further into the matter by myself.

I was told that the matter was beinz looked into.

• Tom Brombach and Stanely Pruitt - In July or August of 1984, I indicated to these men that I had found between 10 to 20 welds that had been cut out or reworked.

The inservice inspections had been done on the old welds.

No new inspections were completed.

Therefore, the inservice inspection reports on these welds were now false..I was told that it would be taken care of.

(Phil Temple knew of my concerns on these matters also.)

• Tom Brombach - In January of 1985 was given two copies of the same

Q Page 3 inservice inspection report of the weld identified as 1-ISI-RC-23.

One copy was of the ultasonic weld inspection report which showed indications and the second copy was of the weld inspection report where the indications had been taken off the report and the problem was now being identified as beam redirection.

The second report was to be placed in the files instead of the first report which was to be destroyed.

I was told to do that by Ron Saunders.

So I did what I thought was right.

I took both copies to Tom Brom-bach and asked if something was. wrong.

He said. not to worry that the renorts were all right. (See attachments 1 and 2, page 4.)

6. Therefore, when it came to informing the quality assurance department during my exit interview of these problems; there was no need to. So in relation to the matters of:

a. Missed steam generator tubes during eddy current inspection,

b. Inservice inspection reports invalidated by rework, and

c. Inservice inspection reports being replaced by additional documentation not based on reinspection; I did not inform the quality assurance personnel.

Other CP&L nersonnel told me not to worry and that matters ~had been taken care of.

In addition. I was not leaving the Harris site and I felt that this I

so called exit interview was irrecular.

I was simolv goine to work in another building at the Harris site.

If I said anything about safety problems; it would certainly tip off CP&L as to what to cover up and it would probably result in retaliation against me.

Consequently, I consider thequality assurance exit interviews as worthless in identifying nuclear safety problems.

This is an internal company interview and it can be used be CP&L unscrupulously.

Fortunately, when it came to the problems with drug abuse by the Conam eddy current inspectors; I had sent the FBI a letter about that in November of 1984 I knew that CP&L would never admit to a drug problem at Harris.

Page 4 7

On my last day of work in August of 1985 I was given another j

CP&L exit interview with the quality assurance people.

This time I was really leaving the Harris ulant site and I decided to state that I had seen nuclear safety troblems.

However, I wouldn't tell the quality assurance people what they were.

In August of 1985 I

had been told that I had been under surveillance at Brunswick, Now if I was under surveillance, then CP&L knew what the safety concerns were which I had looked at,at least at Brunswick.

No CP&L management employee approached me at this time with a statement about what I had seen at Brunswick and what corrective actions would be taken.

Therefore, I told-the quality assurance exit interviewer that I believed that the interview was designed to find out what was wrong and to cover up.

When I filled in the exit interview form; I stated that remark or a similiar indication of lack of trust.

8. In retrospect, the FBI never did anything with the tip that Conam personnel were using drugs and doing steam generator inspections at nuclear plants all over the United States.

CP&L did get around to looking at their steam generator eddy current data.

But it was only after months had passed.

When CP&L started to investigate late in August every area I had worked in with the hope of finding out the nuclear safety concerns I had ( As I believe they wanted to cover them up): CP&L found out that I had voiced some concern about the steam generator inspections.

Therefore CP&L had the Electric Power Research Institute take a look at their eddy current data from the steam generator inspectio'ns.

However, this was months after I brought the matter to the attention of Tom Brombach.

9 It is my belief that the quality check confidential reporting forms are used in the same way as the quality assurance exit interviews.

The main purpose is to coverup nuclear safety complaints, before someone as myself figures out what is going on and goes public.

7 lUt l'2LL Patty J. Miriello

! !, & /,,

/ *, M,fn n,.f,,

,F. i.

m :,,.

j s

NClary D hl - ts t

W idQH bl@etc; Q [,;j)l

a 8

IS7"Sbl-O 9 Qeg.:.2 r, B i~ 3DI ^ 19 Plant /Unic.I,l/dp/ # / __

Page

/

of S~

Comp /Systemf 6 be G L. # _

CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Data Sheet No.I3r ro/-c39#-

Procedure No.rr. f o /

g f.p.y Loop u/3 Subj ect : 9. 0, a o L M cA.f

~

'I Rev/ Change No.

c4 Tyetwiru m e m tvee criocu emr.

Calibra* ion Mf e /Model No. :k G nsL-3 !

semn Ane!.ed'f

%de f/,eu Block No.

OT.Oc-l S // 5"7[c-Fixturine (i a vi? Ided-e-Fabrication No.

9/s Serial No.

e Surface 0,O.

Sweee teneth -

7 80 sevi, e. T,se we.

l-A Block Te=p 4A, U ry.e t fy7 S I " Isoael Comp. Te=p L rry-o r yo "F Swees Delav

7. 70 SI-e &

Thickness

. 772 "

v -. ~.- r,.

2. K -r41 st L CRT Calibrated in nw pulse tenre' /Sa-.<-c hJ reno.29.57e,. e= e e WA c,-<., vf/f".'.*.f Auws

</ WeM A n-Each !!aj. Screen Div= _ 3f7" 4f, meteriew Filter: M/dVideeN/JJack8 43*

we.g,-.4 a-,t.

& frestowe /~.,pyh U. n.

g y si c,.

.s. 4L. 4. WOT n er /e,-.

c 4 - s <35 o,.. 7 f e

c,si. a..

Med, sei -- M Ove 4.UM 3.,-e.f[ttMen e t 3T_

c -,.- 1, - -

• %336 re-,-..WA'e r eWh. #Nr ce,m T s-- n = e-u -

e.a e.........#% s */

DAC PLOT 0 t.T3 8

100 e..

i I s I

, I a

I s

0 INST =.. trEu--v CAL.

hn l

l l

l 6 v

'1 Ame11-2de 70

=== To Wald l

'Tieh! Lev! !Minh lLov 60 g

g

y q l

! To Wald 100l f/ l l (to l Jo I

l l

iM l

8 t

W 2 l 90 l 9/I 6 l I'D l X

\\1

" ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ ~

'3 L fD l fd l 7 l 40 l Sd 20 3_,,, W d4 l

g 70 l Jfl 8 l Go l /f 10 noinnlon' in vno unlnnlini on in-Cire.rt

./f7 4

h7 0 1 2 8

.o g0 g4 5 u ruv em-s m e m i, e-,-

Inicial!

d3 Resule Recordable

-4 yy EIAMINATION Indication s COMMENTS / REASON FOR 80 l

i WELD / AREA Yes.

No l Geom INCC)LDLETED SCAN (S) 80

-12

/7 g,gg,g g y/j v/4 lXI c.,,.g, t,.

q,....C..,

40

+6 82 l

l G.-%

O c\\e < _ Ao-

+e I

N

(

20 l +12 l

M

\\

I E -M' F * 't N

\\

CALIBRATION CHECK!

TIME Inicial Cal.

O F20 Incermediate X

Incermediate Intermediste EXAMINERS 1 *F* / #

Date//f'PJ" Level 2cr i

Final Cal.

/ Job 2@h,

'f-l1

', Date /-/9-frLevel

/

ADDITIONAL SHEETS 7 CHECK B3x REVIEWERS 1 Date

~

Coneinuseten n,,,otne 2

Date j

se,,i -,

e, D<b.,.

r4 3

Date

~

NUCLEAR ENERGY SEAVICES. INC.

- h g8

8 b3

$a4 o

l

/

I.

t a

ra

/

n

/

u s/r

)

/

1:

/r l

/

gJ

.L*,,

n A

A a

4 d

u h

A t

/

o d

/

A

)/s r

L,.

A

• A M

1 i

s f

?

r 7S 2

e 7

d' m

c

?

E t

K d *o/ ai< @

A' kR d"M

, ['

f r

h s

l.

• j e

4 r

A 1

l A

C n

/

.g N

D

'n

/e e

u t

6

}d A a f

.1 I

R r

'rn lo f

S i

f

/

1 E

A

/

w

r

-r r

'A s-

,j e

• r h

d b

g r

I E

C t

I t

v

,'l f

8' x

V N

, f f

e

/

h i

/

f R

E b

e f

o x

A k

o m

s f

/r u

4 s

e Y

w p

A o

W e

1 n

f r

r S

F c

J s

j I

G

/7 t

e d

)

d e%'

s R

Q E

r k

f.

• j' s e

r t

U.

f c

N

) a r

h o

d w S

L A

A A

s E

f t

R

~

u k

w c

f A

I f a J

E.

/

e ( (h R

p 4

• ,l t

s C

Te s

B m

f l

e U

So n..

R a

s j

i o pp jar &,

\\

N s

P mm

1. l f

s e aa o n xx L

5 A

A f

r

)

0 X

)

t A

'l MdQ

~

a m

H Y '~

D nu u

y/ S mHH i

n W

d V

i a.

l blW 1 l

x ff d

a

.f h

a

/

/

3 c

a oo x

o/

m a

S.

s ld l

m 0

t 1

b M/

d i

9l

/

t 00

(

e h

a 55 s

c S. I

. t t e

e a U.

an X

I I

t R

t g

0 A

^~

t N

a a

t S

L 5

H D

P A odd

[

t l l (ww A

V 9

/

eu X

a 4

f.

H P

/

g m mm D

H

/

0 A

5 o oo lA l

r r r 4

'?c f

f f W

j K

e ee C

S

'0 g,j

' 9 "1 l

r c cc A%

f.

4 i

5 0

2 l

n nn l

d 4

/

/(

a aa 5

W O

7 f

r

/

t t t P ng s su i

il a

0 no o,

D DD J

f X

P f.

Y.

l i

i t

t g

0

/

e A

a a

n n

H

~

H i

a c

c l

o u

n m

D L

L W

o a

W WW F

S

• r L

W ic M

f r

3 n

2 O

n s

W p

o E E E

/ *~

i T T T

~

f t

a A A A c0 Y

n y

D D D

/

y e

Y P

9 f

f #

l m A

H f u H

/.

s e

E A' *,.

et R

//#

R a E

t l

C 'd' D

a e

l

" n,.

"S S

w k

e "f

y J{

T c m t

i q

ao u

W O

B r o

L S

j n

f P

t, A

it g a g, E

[a n e c

i c L

S nn f

C A

r C

f 3

l i a I

A L

/

s S

p i

aat D

J gn o

t N 's t ms n

r eei L

R R R e

HRD L

E E E tc d

e U

U u W e{

c I

n F

E E E i

'm i

i j(

m m

I i

I W

V v V PB n

o f

'q 6_

A E E E R

d o

r a

a a

r t

x x

I N

R R R R P

i E

E HRL D

Ii

k

)

/ }

NUCl. EAR ENEllGY SERVICES,INC.

Project No.

Site L Location Dates (M0/Dap/Ys')

~

$ (C (~

fSN// /2 D*/ao b

///9/ W

'"' " #~ "#" Il Location Page

.7 of

. S'

,(

i t em lalen t i f i c a t)pp,.,,,.,pe.,yj a ctd G.

Attached Cal. Data Sheet g.-

• a %, _ '

o r

Bf stJ-@

--l I. 5 _s. 45=

Examina g g j, p4vol Jn:

ngle 0

f Esaminor Lv icasiing g

I

_s 9

HP Hetal Path W max Distance from ( to S.U. at maximune response.

• *" Y RBR Remaining Back Reflection W

liistance frne weld at 50% of Hax amp. (fwd)

L Distance from Datum 0 W

Distance from walal

'at 50% of Hax amp. (hackward) i, l_, ]

]

Ind.

I FWD llACKHARD L

L RBR S.U.

a g

y W

HAY snr HAX 50%

HAX d

tt

["]

• f l- ;i

• W HP W

HP U

llP 50%

max 50%

amp Loc.

r g

y No.

DAC RDIARKS HAX HAX Y

2 13'

o. 9 "

o 84 "

o. so "

o. u "

o.fr '

o.73 "

aAw Ase sv.* 4 so,e love m e t MA sw '

ufrimi <///,1 nursa s-s?,/.</r Y

)pf n,:lk,.,,,fes4t, for gro*,f 9

20 1 %'

o Es

• JJf*

e.7)"

J YC'

o. 9.I '

F o.f cw v ort / w / sura /ader Y

-J,s *a L s e 7 se,e,r a><e f Ne 6

da

c. i3 sjo

p. Y '

o. fr '

c. >

ut' R

ittor si 4

~

i,.r.ar r.

w no ne,- i.aVade aMJsA ss Y

'l 20 038' sJi c.15 '

s yt' r n' her '

&4r/

^

Erafree w M b da//*** 7 (Airre's +tVs PJC s/ L/sen / ctor (D 7.'l.Ir d# e-6 8

8 N

' ly y

IRAW FULL SCALE PLOT llERE:

g 1

}"

Jf j"'

lI lll I

l 7

x N\\

REVIDJER DATE

\\

N REVIDJER DATE f

/ pe/*

REVIDJER DATE I

a

,,,,,r c.

i..in si. ii.,<,,,,<,-< /~-

.s i

O g

C1 any

)

NUCt. EAR ENEROY SERVICES. INC.

Project No.

Site L Location Dates (Mo/lb.p/Yi-),

< t- {f rs/W/"Z f*/co W

///f/VS 1J 1.ocation Page 9

_of 5'

Iteen Identifica,g lon f.jjf.gg _ a y a

pffy q,

,,'y,,

t

,u X

8 Tp got nulu O

4 5"_4. 45[

Attactied C;st. Data o

Emininer:

\\*

E= amine C-1 u v e, sea inning

__ _ __J g,,

I HP He tal,Pa tti W man Distance from ( to S.U. at maximum response.

RBR Remaining Back Reflection W

Distatice f rase weld at 50% of Hax amp. (fwd)

L Distance from Datum 0 1

9 tilstance f rom wuld e

• nt 50% of Hux amp. (hackward)

I t,

L f_, j d

Ind.

I FWD BACKHARD 1.g L

RBR S.U.

2 W

MAY

' int HAX 50%

HAX J[,- j ri f

w :i

• W HP W

HP W

HP 50%

max 50%

amp Loc.

Cr*

g 2

No.

DAC RDMRh' HAX HAX Y

8

o. s tre o.fr s e's

e. fr

/)2 at kiw A-gare sis,aist,ds see., no*

?k sl/es x/ea//s s/ erris ms/Jud.s 4

/&

o. 7 d17 0.40 0.93 o en

/ou

~

r ra Res,ri p/

sse.4 - se s e

/0 Je

/. 4.o Jjs

/ if

.701 f.60 132 4

ctre.'

A

/*

Se/m..co ago,rtir s,ana, a t

it 20

.? <! "

16f' 2.2f "

t. s 7 '

) 4*

s.12 "

kru A

f)e

-ets,,a/J pr co or hoffsn er s><ld 12 20 oJS

p. M "

o.Cf 0.68 Oli e,21' kru 5

/r*fe reher& Ds7/S nef f 4/A eaa//14 esfinte cast /

r$Edloer k anaA/sv }/5besir nsig/,. --

DRAW FULt. SCALE PLOT llERE:

A'r#ste Me g

e CW)

I@

O 0

'11 y

_sg.1Y I

REVI EWER DATE

{

^

i,'

REVIEUER DATE

\\

+

REVIDJER DATE

'.'s, g

g s

b

.. ~

,,wsn

.~,i~.., e..

-k k

o O

,3

--=

Wroj:ctlilo S!ta I.,lecation Dates (HQ/Idi/Ya')

C(i,,

51W/ J/

tbt.o

• c/

stir /VS

• m: s- *s -4 6'- e s S t ates IJesit i f icar lose u 1.ucatsun P.nua

(

af C'

g,fggy

,,'s a

,, 7 ",,m, _

3ggjgvg "~

4igl{

n*

4 s*t 4s';

At*aa*d Cal "a'*

g,,

e..

Ia.r

\\i

.n na J

n ifd6 A

Dimenotaar luom. ) 6

\\*,{,j,/

Emmeln.a r

-IA Lava-v '/_-

icennisig Tlalcknous

.77)

() for s.

HP Het al 'Pa ris W imas litstance f rom g to S.U. at maulenium response.

..u g R58 RemainlnR Rack Reflection y

pg,g,,,, g,,,,,jni d at 5GI of Haw a sa p. (fud)

--g--

L Distance from natum o g,L g g,,,,,, g,,,,,, g,g,.at 50% of H.au aug.. (Isackward) g, l

Ind.

I FWin MACl(llARD 1.g L

RRR S.U. -

8 2

W tg1_

snr HAY

_ Sil!

HAM

' l,_,,

d r*]

["}

)

l of W IL*

I W

HP U

HP ll HP SOE mau 50%

amp Loc.

r g

2 Ho.

DAC RDIARKS HAN HAX jr go o.}ls' d

0. 69 ~

G' s.9V A

& Yrw Y

R-s" Ard-WAo'

• m 7

s sxA*/on/u//s w 1w w M/'

4/sr4.,Ls

/

/

/

p 7

/

GRAW FULL SCALE PLOT llERE:

x~

I REVIDghnTil $3tiflfje[g DATE /N d "I'

T i

REVIEWER DATE s.7#

j REVIB#Eg DATE W

Arin 1-DKS s

t

.-...,_.6-....-__.,,

___.5?.??, A9 9IV^'l-A1 tf Pitnt/ Unit 8//2/p/ "/

Page

/

of

.S~ g r3 C wp/Systeme,,Ar r,i.. t CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Da ta Sheec No. f.T7" TD/C"

1. 24 f1*

Procedure No.mf r. ro/

150j.ju.p. y Loop u/3

Subject:

9. r:8oo f McM Rev/ Change No.

M l

tverstners r er-ttvt e trioru trut-Calibration Mf e / Mod el No. tk G (! AL-3 I se sn Anet.. //f" Med f/re.e4 Block No.

OT-S o - l fikYvi-M e d. e-Fabrication.No.

N/s 2 /1 S"9[e Fixeurtne Surface O.O.

$+ rial No.

free tenech -

7. 80 Sevt.

3-tva. W.

I*M Block Temp % U f9 e!

sd UI E*od e Comp. Temp % Tr9-o f 7e T

7. 70 st-. 4 eb.a.-

Thickness

. 772 "

$ren Delav 3. K.<a 4 r_

car e,tt3,,,,e 1, t se taneeS/53- *- hJ v.-...- v Pu N W Nl b'* H' A \\\\ %3 Each Maj.' Screen Div=. If7

Yh s

-*et

'te sa Feee. ? O. $ 'te~.

1.s -.

US, me ecie6 Sa'N ra ass r

4/ I *

~

h %2.(*)

4/d v'd ee MTae'< 2

9. w -.,8 2-et.

Filcert M**

frneawe,/wyn/

g y yo e

4. s en s,-,. 1 y lr,st.

v. --w h b WOT c.

n er /c.s.

u Mede sa t ** - M 0 2 * --W 'a r - -',-- e -,-.s.t_0++r o e \\ X s

S N A3EA

• i336 c,

e

....hk e d/fs. %

h..-t.--

3..-u.

DAC FLOT 0* Mt7 e.......,. f% f '/-

100 1

I t

I s 1

1 i a

i q

f 90 no,,,,,

h7r; o

INSTR. t rms--r int.

== To Cald l

ur ti-de 70 l

l t

(

lM M l -- l 1 To Neld l

lRish! tav! lWith! tov

(. )r l 100l,S"I l e l (eo l 30 l

l I

l l TN l I

I I

I I

I l\\

90 l 9/l 6 l.fo l g 2

I 1

.,97 a3 3

TD l fd l7l 40l 30 20 cy, K 4 l 70llfl3l del g to g g ;g,,,,,,, g,,; g g, g g,,; ng,n, g,,

gi_= gg

.o'.g0 h7 8

0 1 2 4 5 m,.,. ~ --.. - m, -

Inici.21l d3 lResui:

Recordable lJf ELuiUA !ON ladiescien s COE.'".T!5/RZASCN TOR l

80 4

WEI.3/M M Tes lNo lG4cm UC::MPT. u TC.uf (S) 8

-12 O

i - er,so - es I AW l ^6 XI c..m

,i, t.

G I.. m N

I I

I O.,%

L d, <

c. m %

f

'O

+6 l 82 20 l +t2 l

12

\\

l I

l <z --h a

\\

l

\\

l I

l CALI3 RATION C'4?T TT:4E

\\

l 1

Inicial Cat.

l c g.:ze

\\

Incer=edi.2ce l

g Incermedisca l

P ~ i..u-es Incermedisee l

ELuiDERS 1 #-g<

Dace /pr1.r Level m-v TLnal Cal.

>fycb 2Ws 1,/ LL Daee /./5-frtave1

~

H/dLA ADDITIONAL SHIITS? CHECX BOY RE7IE'a'E23 Ipn'n5fd cG't rndersDate /-74-9 7

,Iontinume % lh e...,

ot, e NI 2

Dace 3..,,,.., c4..

u 3

~

NUCt.EAA ENEFGY SERVtCES. INC.

s

g.5_

NUCt. EAR ENEROY SERVICES,INC.

~

Project Wo.

Sita L Location listas (Ho/lbf/Y:-)

zwax $

issr/92 J'rsr ravM st i

e.

u Location Paga

,2 of J i t.no Islentification,.,3f. g.22 g,p o

• =,, _, _

y,.,,,,,,,,,

4!aumleser s Tg gu,g)

AssHia 8 6

4 Ss.

4 %'$

AE E"'I'"'I Cu l. lies a n Slicet

[

\\a

&.k.*

it=== l ae r s u-lA l.uvun r

,e 11sichnuun

,rr)

. y,,,,,,,)

p

/ g 2,r A...,m,

.s g 56d.t pl#L*SE !E_l!!!!!!!d #,

itP He t al 4'a s ta

'W man Illutancu f rom y to S.U. at seau fmum response.

RRE Remaining tack bioflection W

liistanca f reue idl.1 at 50% of Blax amp. ( f usi)

-l--

l.

Distance froan Datum u W

lituaance f rom wal I mt SUI of Hun amp. (laschwaral)

'In 3, 3

FH(1 IIACKilAltli l _,; j

-d-1.g g*

17 HRR S.U.

u bl& L jant HAX 5tlZ HAX s* 1

][,"g i

t-' Il '*

W HP W

HP 11 HP 50%

mau 50%

amp Loc.

g 2

No.

DAC RDtARKS HAX llAX 1

,1o c lY spy"

p. s c s 9p" sW sir" d

~

oilso_

^

re anar//s. tera rf r.nr fi er's s

A

,,,, A f,

vr s

~

~

so' ise A

o.rluo K

4Y is

2. r>~

s <>

jx

s. vi s Are _ os se.,.e/it, so.m, a.,, ao e.a,w 31

/0 PSA

.O ($_

1. Y O pf 66Y L* Yi At/dir /

N 2

Ralstre ImahAll

'I I" i A.*/ 9 1t9 er 2 /"

t

\\

ser

><,,) 6 / s.usMr ie/<lis*1A<s-

\\

ifa/

\\_

1. fit /1& c'st/s/4t"lf4/// A/'"

N L

.ustisi Arra/abr.

n

( f l f

• g'* 'g' j[* 'l'

[I#' '###r I

I

, &c

.e

. 8*

DRAW FULL SCAL.E PLOT HERE:

l

[

\\

\\

1. 4_

I REVitbilald SaullderS DATE /-2S f.I 3w w

T s

REVIEWER DATE s

D s

REVIEWEA DATE

~

I 0

w

'4 t.

. I

\\

_ yJ p.,

'}

t Prsject No.

Sits I. l.ocation D:cci (Mo/Ibi/Yi-)

~

SCC, (~

MN// //

/hAoa 8

/// W W

. 1 Item identifScat)9p,.,'# " '"

W t.ocatton) G.

P.nga

.7 of -

I'

• i i

a g,.,7(.,3 pag e

y_

a a

d

'" a =gy 4s= R Act]a

'9 5 -

L

\\-

,j /

a a

cammiop,pippoi -

4o;i.ig o

4s t 5

e mania or 0-IA t.uwat I

1. /

s_.

=l f //) pf A., -.1.1

canning A

%ita /4.A niamaral_.in!!ed f-

_s

.a u

I HP Hatal Patin W ma x. DistancefromytoS.U.atsmaximumresponsa.

• • "f

{

kBR Remainiseg Rac'd llaflection W

Dia.tancefroessbidCat 50% of Blax amp. (fud)

-i--

-i - - ~ ~"*"'

t.

Dissance f rom Datuas 0 u

plutanica f ruen wal.1 e at 50% of H.ix manp.(laackward) g, j

tud.

I FWD 11ACI UAltp I.g y*

I.)

RBR S.U.

I f _-

d e-]

U blAX _ _.$ilt HAY.

_511Z HAM "f

t-- 'La

["I}

W HP W

HP W.j HP Sox ima x 50%

amp Loc.

J F

g Ho.

DAC RDIARKS hag HAX W Ap'r w,, y s,,, y,y,,, y w fw 2

. 11~

o. 9 '

n SC

• aso" p.12 "

o. W o it '

o >Tw e

e i.trmasu.imirieNsi,/. iso Y

e'sA s;r ski.losMifor no* A/

9 20

_s 1i

.93+*

1 tr '

o. W

.s vi' o 9.I' r

o. r 'r' s=

vursob ni A/er h

_dO Oi

/ 93

$.Y

& f/

0)

//f N

Afgo)

A MearP fA

• • / 6

• T te.9 ef toelf /* 9e w n o' rie r i A J d e ro/ J 's h )s k

9 20 o JU'

>.a t' a vi '

/ f t' e 12' ser' d

pas f sseras, g,v/ bJos/es 7 exare/r +tYo pj<

e e/ k.Jun /cw s

.* Y (1) **C'"

W sk sWas ts' 8

sRAu ruu. SCALE Fl.DT HERE:

j f.,6[

.s a y

8

's g

g N

N L

x REVIEWhbnal[ aundef5iATE['/d M s$

g REVIEUER DATE N'"# #

Y REVIEUER DATE 8

,i 4

. g,,,yc caras p /Af *<l/x /Je/t w 'l dw! /"* ^~'***^'"

4, N M s.23.e5

.t I

J e

b

+

117-4~o/-ejry i

\\

f..,,.

s i

y C1 I.I 4r h++

c:.N )

l Crv i

ru-t i

3 4

.a i

-.-: i s, t.

4 N;p-. '( 't----y1,g'y

-j

=

s

\\

t. r.

j t h:,

1.,.

2. _.

i

=

s s, t,

& M i

i-4 S

1

-I t

E-l l

s s

s t

9

.u J-- l

t. l q w e

4

,e e,.,. 9..

s e

s

~. -

9 3

.s e

=

=

1 5

i t i E

m 3

4 4

m t x 1

E i

3:

m s-x

'i N

.~6

=

' g.

h.......

4 s

D i g ;;

e s

e d

e

=

a E

- aa 1, _.

-l

==

~

s m

a w 4

4 5

T 9

x=

e :S n

3

'i* 22 C

t* L

=

m * --

/L m

Il

~

at.

._.S

]j:38 h b 3

3 S

1 m - =.

/

a

,e

,t

.t A.E 1**

u

=

s=

=ee f

.=

.=a :-

- 4

=

u O

Y 5

=

,=

. m. _J _.'

O T. ".

\\k t

T w

e M

3 5

m g

g M

k

] !!

Oj T

t N

2 a

g g 3 y

e g

g g

a Y

l N

g

,, =

c s

s 3

<s 9

NN 4

et e'c 8'

Q.. =t

=

a A

A on 3

a.

g h

L b

• e 3

3%

M 3%

2d2l5 E

• '} "

N o.

3

=

e n se

• a-9'

_n o

,3 di' ssa C

w

=

=

na h

k e

y s

s s

e s

y 2 --

0 m u u N

b

<c 4

.e:

a g

g g g g uW-h:;"

2.

y s

a3 N

• e 5

5 s

t.

S s

ma w

t' Y

w g

Q

.9 w

9 y

o D ' s<

(

C kj 9

3 u a

,e A

~

q g

s i

w e

'.g 6

s 9

(

3 Sc4 E8 U

.:=

e en e

u

<ae l

.u.

s z

u u

-u g

g g

U

~$

I N

M e

( 4

==

', l.

14 y

.,h *. I "

m M

m

/

a e..

r w

.s.

3 s

X-2 I

far u u w

3 *Q Q W 2

• • 2 U

3 2

la.

Q 66

/

m a

s s

• - St.s 4

j

m. B. B..

i 0

3 :

d j

i

==>

i

=

=

a

=

s e

I

,e

u n.

L

. i1 -

I Eq 4.

'N I

A

,=Qe*r l

r-Q-.

r 1

e n %,::J.

t.

s

\\'

---qrtl.g O;

. _ u ::

8 f

[:

{ 1

/

~

1 '4

/

l J-l

} l 1

/

i

,s

_1 4 g

~

Q

~3

,i a

\\

==

i

~

\\

l Y R,

.i ~ 2 t

u.

,M h i.f

\\

~

M l

u g.

nn d

+

~

L 3 y q13

.i q

- x h

';. % ! ~3 m z m

l a

\\,

't

~~

=

3 e 3==

a g

u I

1

] !_

'=1'=. E.E g :2 i g' 2 ".*.

1. 5 y

'1

(

T2

3,. _= ou:

3" U"

J e

.g; m.

.e

\\'\\

33 l

% d u213 4

k

's k5 4

i-s u u N

e s

t s

2

=

~

.a t =5s i

l s

l' 24 is E EE Ot ;15

)

=

0 U

2 i

E. =

5

(

F g

i 6

w j,o < 5 ~.i ' =I j

j-3 3

ti-v

~

==

'N E

,N Y Y, Ul p

s n

?

s b

).:

,1 2 a m

2 a.

s L

I s

\\

C S

)

R N, ', *!.

, =

s i

s 4

=

a q

,3 u

of i I

IN e"

% 3 k

$h,h,.k a

n

_%)2?

as 3

E S

~

s_gg

-u a :

a.a a

zu 2

3 4

u i

s 4

]

5 E E..

1,. 2 2

e:

==

O e

9

__________.____--.-__________._____.__-___m-

~

.m Ters 80245 ATTAciSc 3 3

~5/84 q07 Case Namoer (A.ssigned by QCP Coordinator)

EMPLOTIE EXIT Q1.'ESTIONNAIRE 1.

Were you provided o entatloc on the Harris Nuclear Prajact quality Cbeck No[

progras?

Yes

- J..

Have you reported any concerna or alienations in regard to the design, fabrication, constructi n, test, s tarta- '

or inspection of the Harris.

Nucisar Project?

Te,s No 3.

If you reported concarns or allegaci'cas, were the results satisfactory?

j YesC NoO

===e91c=6tp 1

4 Doyouhaveany]re==Nasconcer'asorelleganicaswhichyouhavenocreported?

Yes No If answer is YES, complete QCR forma What is your / reason for lear <ing the iscris Nuclear Fro et?

5.

lA C.<.M 1, t2.

AA-M Th3 estached Q ity check hport form may be usted at some later time for reporttits concerns or allegations which you'say havs reported previously withou: satisfactory recults or ich you have not.: port A

/

OOYY U

k"l Y ~

Data __.

dd Ncer?

j WY 1 Signatura 7

Data Commenced Work Name ATM M /27 /Af6'L./ O (print) at Harris Projec'c kN l

Address NO, $j J2D M Telephone No.

d N'

AHL E i GH, A/. Q. 2 76 O' Tha QCF Cecedinator or one of his representatives will assist if needed in filling out thia form or the attachment.

i j

. Dace 2."/ h - I I N3ces: $ Lo t l

& H

y. h W f

.,u h C k kW -

n A

)

0 Y /u d wJA uW l'[C18 c,tdinator c:p Represe ive

Attachment:

Quality Check Report form (To be provided to employee) i i

i

.