ML20209D752

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Review of Section 3/4.4.9, Pressure Temp Limits, & Bases,Per 841217 Memo.Section Acceptable,Except Heatup & Cooldown Curves,Figures 3.4.2 & 3.4.3,applicability Must Be Reduced Up to 5 EFPY
ML20209D752
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Diablo Canyon
Issue date: 01/08/1985
From: Johnston W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Crutchfield D, Crutchfield P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML082410749 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-86-197, RTR-REGGD-01.099, RTR-REGGD-1.099 NUDOCS 8501140056
Download: ML20209D752 (2)


Text

.- -__

i

'f/,4Ms.Mh i

=.

o UNITED STATES

~

g j f g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

s

[

g waswincrou. o. c. 2osss JAN 8 1985 Docket No:

50-275/323 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Dennis M. Crutchfield, Assistant Director for Safety Assessment Division of Licensing FROM:

William V. Johnston, Assistant Director Materials, Chemical & Environmental Technology Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

DIABLO CANYON UNIT 2 - COMPLETION OF REVIEW OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS In your memorandum of December 17, 1984 you requested that we review the technical specifications, which were enclosed in the PG&E letter DLC-84-309 dated 09/21/84. We have reviewed section 3/4.4.9,

" Pressure / Temperature Limits" and their bases.

Our conclusion is that the section is acceptable except that the heatup and cooldown curves, Figure 3.4-2 and 3.4-3, are applicable for 5 effective full power years (EFPY) and 6 EFPY for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively.

If these curves are to be used for both units, the applicability must be reduced to "up to 5 EFPY."

The period of applicability for these curves depends upon the amount of radiation damage to the limiting beltline materials in each unit.

We have utilized the method recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.99 Rev.

1., " Effects of Residual Elements on Predicted Radiation Damage to Reactor Vessel Materials," and the materials properties and neutron fluence estimates for the beltline reported in the technical specification bases for Units 1 and 2 to determine the amount of radiation damage.

The licensee appears to have used Figure B 3/4.4-2 in the bases to determine the amount of radiation damage.

For high copper weld, this Figure is non-conservative.

Since both units have high copper welds, this would be the source of the error in their heatup and cooldown curves.

W y

M 3

William V. Johnston, Assistant Director Materials, Chemical & Environmental Technology Division of Engineering cc:

See Next Page

Contact:

B. Elliot X-27742 91bll900G.Mk e._,e4,-

=w

.=qew==e---

==

k

o Dennis M. Crutchfield JAN 8 HE6 cc:

R. Vollmer D. Eisenhut.

S. Pawlicki B. D. Liaw E. Butcher C. Moon E. Sullivan C. Cheng W. Hazelton R. Klecker B. Elliot DISTRIBUTION:

DMB - Docket Files MTEB Reading Files MTEB Diablo Canyon Files 4-,-

4-1 1

l 0FC :

DE:MTEBgL EB

TDE:AQ, CET:

i EB 0:

.h___...__y9414q/._...__________.____

.... _. _ _ _.. _... J.yr,__;. ____.....

W. Johns # ton :

_ _ _ _ _........ _ _ _ _ _ ).. _ _ 'g... _ _ _.. _ _ _h_ _i aw NAME :B. Elliot:vt 61 ton :B. Dj DATE :

1/4/85 1/ / /85 1/'l/85 1/ $f/85

/

i l

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY l

I l