ML20209D697
Text
-_
f
,,p M % q
-e UNITED STATES Y
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
E WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
/
(-
/-
December 17, 1984 f
....+
t f
l MEMORANDUM FOR: Robert W. Houston, Assistant Director for Reactor Safety, DSI William V. Johnston, Assistant Di~ ectort
>i r
for Materials, Chemical & Environmental Engineering, DE
>e 5,
James P. Knight, Assistant Director
(
for Components & Structures Engineering, DE s
Lester S. Rubenstefn, Assistant' Director for Core & P1antMystems, gDSI < '
q,
~
Daniel R. Muller, Assistan't D'i.ector L
for Radiation Protection, DSI ~
(~
p.-
b' Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director j
'~
l Division of Human Factors Safety N
X-
^
l
,/
FROM:
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Assistant Director for Safety Assessment, DL
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON UNIT 2 - COMPLETION OF REVIEW 0F l
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS s c
, q,'
By memorandum dated October 19, 1984 George W. Knighton, Chfef Licensing f
Branch No. 3 advised (1) that PG&E had proposed technical specifications for Diablo Canyon Unit 2 (letter DLC-84-309 dated 09/21/84); (2)athat in accordance with NPR Office Letter No. 38 (H. R. Denton, Ju1y 23 L 1984) those proposed technical specifications need not be reviewed by technica?
l review branches, and (3) that the technical specifications for Unit 2 Eill be the same as for Unit 1 except as necessary for design differences. Alnit I had technical specifications issued as part of the low power license int 1981.
These were modified and issued as technical specificat. ions for the ful? poQer license on November 2, 1984.
As noted in Mr. Knighton's memorandum of October 19, 1984, F. Anderson, SSPB was reviewing the technical specification packaoe for Unit 2.
That effort has been completed and the updated technical spacifications are l
attached as Enclosure 1.
We believe that this package includes all of the changes requested by PG&E and specific infonnation for Units 1 and 2 such that this combined package of technical specifications can be issued with the Unit 2 license and concurrently can be incorporated in the Unit I license-).
by amendment. Enclosure 2 incluaes a listing of page references for information spacific to Unit 1 and 2
'O v]%
rwwoa
(
~2-December 17, 1984 Subsequent to George Knighton's memorandum of October 19, 1984 we have been informed by memorandum dated November 1, 1984 from Brian Sheron, RSB (Enclosure 3), that he believes inconsistencies between the FSAR analysis and the technical specifications may exist for Diablo Canyon based on RSB's review of other NTOL Westinghouse plant technical speci-fications. Because of,this and other differences between Unit,1 and Unit 2 listed in Enclosure 2, we request your confirmation that the technical specifications in Enclosure 1 are acceptable.
The projected date for a decision on issuance of an operating license for Unit 2 is the end of January 1985.
Prior to that time we plan to provide u
LB-3 with Enclosure 1 as a Final Draft for issuance to PG&E for their review and certification.
If any changes are identified to be necessary as a result of, y'our confirmation review we would incorporate those changes in the Final Draft.
WerequestbhtyourreviewsbecompletedbyJanuary7,1985.
Any questions g
should be directed to Calvin Moon (x29786), Technical Specification Review
- Group, a
['
Dennis M. Crutchfield, ist nt Director for Safety Assessmen Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated
-4, p
cc: w/ Enclosure 2 & 3 only D. Eisenhut T. Novak
- 8. Sheron F. Rosa W. Butler B. Liaw V. Benroya W. Regan R. Bosnak i
G. Lear l'
V. Noonan M. Srinivasan
- 0. Parr i
C. Berlinger L. Hulman W. Gammill F. Congel V. Moore D. Beckman L. Reiter
^~
t, t
g.
December 17, 1984 Subsequent to George Knighton's memorandum o*'Octnber 19, 1984 we have been informed by memorandum dated November 1,1984 from Brian Sheron, RSB (Enclosure 3), that he believes inconsistencies between the FSAR analysis and the technical specifications may exist for Diablo Canyon based on RSB's review of other NT0L Westinghouse plant technical speci-
'~
fications. Because of this and other differences between Unit I and Unit 2 listed in Enclosure 2, we request your confirration that the
. stechnical specifications in Enclosure 1 are acceptable.
The projected date for a decision on issuance of an operating license for Unit 2 is the end of January 1985. Prior to that time we plan to provide LB-3 with Enclosure 1 as a Final Draft for issuance to PGAE for their review and certification. Tf any changes,are identified to be necessary as a result of your confirmation review we;diuld incorporate those changes in the Final Draft.
J We request that your reviews be completed by January 7, 1985.d Any questions shouldbedirectedtoCalvinMoon'(x29786),Tec.}nicalSpecificationReview Group.
J Original signed by Dennis M. Crutchfield, Assistant Director for Safety Assessment N
Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated cc: w/ Enclosure 2 & 3 only DISTRIBUTION D. Eisenhut Central File T. Novak TSRG File B. Sheron CMoon
.Q F. Rosa if EButcher W. Butler B. Liaw V. Benroya W. Regan 4
R. Bosnak G. Lear
(
V. Noonan
- 0. Parr g '2; M. Srinivasan C. Berlinger L. Hulman W. Gammill 00 e DL D. Beckman on:Jc E t#her y D DC Jtchfield i
L. Reiter 12/n /84 12/ q/84 12/p/84
.. -